Companies › AAWH

AAWH 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. · OTC · Medicinal Chemicals & Botanical Products · CIK 1756390 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc.'s public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

83 / 75risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
8new risk-factor headings
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-03-12 (period ending 2025-12-31) with 10-K filed 2025-03-13 (period ending 2024-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

83new paragraphs
75removed paragraphs
118reworded paragraphs
24,205 → 22,174words in section

New heading “Limitations on cannabis license ownership may constrain our growth and operational flexibility.”

New heading “Our business is concentrated in a limited number of states, and adverse developments in any of those states could have a disproportionate impact on our business.”

New heading “We face physical security risks related to our operations and cash handling.”

New heading “An active trading market for our Class A common stock may not be sustained, which could limit liquidity and increase volatility.”

New heading “Our Board may issue preferred stock with rights senior to our Class A common stock, which could adversely affect our stockholders and deter a change in control.”

New heading “Limited analyst coverage or unfavorable analyst reports could adversely affect the market price and trading volume of our Class A common stock.”

New heading “Our use of artificial intelligence technologies may expose us to operational, regulatory, data privacy, and reputational risks.”

New heading “We may be subject to litigation, arbitration, or other legal proceedings that could adversely affect our business.”

Removed heading “We may face limitations on ownership of cannabis licenses.”

Removed heading “We operate in a highly regulated sector and may not always succeed in complying fully with applicable regulatory requirements in all jurisdictions where we conduct business.”

Removed heading “We face security risks.”

Removed heading “Our operational systems and networks have been, and will continue to be, subject to an increasing risk of continually evolving cybersecurity or other technological risks, which could result in a loss of customer business, financial liability, regulatory penalties, damage to our reputation or the disclosure of confidential information.”

Removed heading “We face intense competition.”

Removed heading “Our voting control is concentrated.”

Removed heading “There can be no assurance that we will repurchase shares of Class A common stock for cancellation.”

Removed heading “A decline in the price of the shares of Class A common stock could affect our ability to raise further capital and adversely impact our ability to continue operations.”

Removed heading “We may face liquidity risks.”

Removed heading “We may issue shares of preferred stock in the future, which could make it difficult for another company to acquire us or could otherwise adversely affect holders of our Class A common stock, which could depress the price of our Class A common stock.”

Removed heading “We may experience risks relating to the closing of acquisitions or investments.”

Removed heading “If securities or industry analysts do not publish or cease publishing research or reports or publish misleading, inaccurate or unfavorable research about us, our business or our market, our stock price and trading volume could decline.”

Removed heading “We may be subject to litigation.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: investigation, litigation, fine, penalt
“From time to time, we may be involved in litigation, arbitration proceedings, regulatory investigations and other legal matters in the ordinary course of business. Such matters may relate to, among other things, commercial disputes, employment matters, regulatory compliance, intellectual property, contractual obligations or other issues. Litigation and other legal proceedings are inherently uncertain, and outcomes are difficult to predict. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: fine, sanction, regulation
“While we endeavor to comply with all relevant laws, regulations and guidelines and we are in compliance or are in the process of being assessed for compliance with all such laws, regulations and guidelines, any failure to comply with the regulatory requirements applicable to our operations may lead to possible sanctions including the revocation or imposition of additional conditions on licenses to operate our business; the suspension or expulsion from a particular market or jurisdiction or of our key personnel; …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: investigation, litigation, class action
“In addition, adverse health effects, whether real or perceived, could expose us to product liability claims, class action litigation, governmental investigations or enforcement actions, and increased compliance and insurance costs, regardless of the ultimate merit of such claims. The occurrence of any of the foregoing could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and reputation.”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: penalt
“Our operational systems and networks have been, and will continue to be, subject to an increasing risk of continually evolving cybersecurity or other technological risks, which could result in a loss of customer business, financial liability, regulatory penalties, damage to our reputation or the disclosure of confidential information.”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: tariff, china, regulation
“Additionally, the U.S. has imposed and may impose additional quotas, duties, tariffs, retaliatory or trade protection measures or other restrictions or regulations and may adversely adjust prevailing quota, duty or tariff levels, which can affect both the materials that we use to package our products and the sale of finished products. For example, the tariffs imposed by the U.S. on materials from China are impacting materials that we import for use in packaging in the U.S. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: russia, ukraine, supply chain, inflation

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

In addition, our business is dependent on a number of key inputs and their related costs, including raw materials and supplies related to our growing operations, as well as electricity, waterwater, and other utilities. Any significant interruption or negative change in the availabilityavailability, cost or economicsreliability of the supply chain for keythese inputs could materially impact our financial condition and operating results. Further,Macroeconomic conditions, geopolitical events, supply chain disruptions, inflationary pressures, and changes in utility pricing or availability may increase the invasioncost of Ukraine by Russia and the resulting measures that have been taken, and could be taken in the future, may have a negative impact on our costs, including for inputenergy, materials, energy,or andtransportation transportation.or limit access to critical inputs. Any inability to secure required supplies and servicesservices, or to do so on appropriateacceptable termsterms, could have a materially adverse impact on our business, financial conditioncondition, and operating results.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (276)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Added

•risks related to our capital structure, including the concentration of voting control associated with our Class B common stock and the automatic conversion of such shares;

Removed

•the effect of the voting control exercised by holders of Class B common stock;

Removed

•the effect of our Buyback Program;

Reworded

•risks related to our ability to continueexpand toour openoperations, including opening new dispensariesdispensaries, cultivation and cultivationprocessing facilities asand anticipatedintegrating acquisitions;

Added

•risks related to compliance with complex and evolving state and local cannabis regulations, including licensing, renewals and enforcement;

Removed

•the effect of restricted access to banking and other financial services;

Removed

•the effect of security risks;

Reworded

•the effect of risks related to material acquisitions, dispositions and other strategic transactionstransactions, including the failure to realize anticipated benefits;

Reworded

•the effect of risks related to cybersecurity, data privacy, information technology systems and reliance on third-party service providers;

Added

•risks related to litigation, regulatory investigations and enforcement actions;

Removed

•the effect of product liability claims and other litigation to which we may be subjected;

Added

•risks related to challenging or volatile global economic, political or financial conditions, including inflation, interest rates, supply chain disruptions and reduced consumer spending;

Removed

•the effect of sustained inflation;

Removed

•the effect of political and economic instability;

Removed

•the effect of outbreaks of pandemic diseases, fear of such outbreaks or economic disturbances due to such outbreaks; and

Removed

•the effect of general economic risks, such as the unemployment level, interest rates, and inflation, and challenging global economic conditions.

Reworded

Cannabis remains illegal under U.S. federal law, and enforcement of cannabis laws could change.change in a manner that materially or adversely affects our business.

Reworded

Unlike in Canada, which has federal legislation uniformly governing the cultivation, distribution, sale and possession of medical and adult-use cannabis, for both adult-use and medical purposes, cannabis is largely regulated at the state level in the United States. To date, the cultivation and sale of cannabis for medical uses has been legalized in 39a significant number of U.S. states, four of five permanently inhabited U.S. territoriesterritories, and the District of Columbia.Columbia, Theand adult-use of cannabis has been legalized in 24a states,growing the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, and the Districtnumber of Columbia.jurisdictions. AlthoughNotwithstanding certainsuch U.S.state-level states have legalized the sale of medical or adult-use cannabis,legalization, the sale, distribution, and cultivation of cannabis and cannabis-related products remains illegal under U.S. federal law pursuant to the CSA. The CSA classifies cannabis as a Schedule I controlled substance, and as such, medical and adult-use cannabis use is illegal under U.S. federal law.

Added

Any reclassification of cannabis to Schedule III of the CSA, whether through executive action or congressional legislation, would not, in itself, render medical or adult-use cannabis lawful under federal law; further legislative amendments would be required to achieve that result. However, such a reclassification could have other significant legal and regulatory implications for companies operating in the cannabis industry, including potential changes to the application of Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code, which currently limits the ability of businesses trafficking in Schedule I or Schedule II controlled substances to deduct ordinary business expenses for federal income tax purposes.

Added

Due to the conflicting views between state legislatures and the federal government regarding cannabis, cannabis businesses are subject to inconsistent laws and regulations. In August 2013, the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) issued guidance outlining certain federal enforcement priorities relating to cannabis-related offenses in jurisdictions that had implemented regulatory frameworks for cannabis. That guidance was subsequently rescinded, and there is currently no DOJ guidance that limits the discretion of federal prosecutors in determining whether to pursue enforcement actions relating to cannabis activities, notwithstanding the existence of state-level cannabis laws. As a result, federal prosecutors retain broad discretion with respect to the enforcement of federal cannabis laws, and there can be no assurance as to the enforcement posture that will be adopted by the DOJ or U.S. Attorneys at any given time.

Removed

Due to the conflicting views between state legislatures and the federal government regarding cannabis, cannabis businesses are subject to inconsistent laws and regulations. The Obama administration attempted to address the inconsistent treatment of cannabis under state and federal law in August 2013 in a memorandum which then-Deputy Attorney General James Cole sent to all U.S. District Attorneys (the “Cole Memorandum”). The Cole Memorandum outlined certain priorities for the Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) relating to the prosecution of cannabis offenses and noted that, in jurisdictions that have enacted laws legalizing cannabis in some form and that have also implemented strong and effective regulatory and enforcement systems to control the cultivation, processing, distribution, sale and possession of cannabis, conduct in compliance with such laws and regulations was not a priority for the DOJ. However, the DOJ did not provide (and has not provided since) specific guidelines for what regulatory and enforcement systems would be deemed sufficient under the Cole Memorandum.

Removed

On January 4, 2018, then-U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions formally issued a memorandum (the “Sessions Memorandum”) which rescinded the Cole Memorandum effective upon its issuance. The Sessions Memorandum stated, in part, that current law reflects “Congress’ determination that cannabis is a dangerous drug and cannabis activity is a serious crime,” and Mr. Sessions directed all U.S. Attorneys to enforce the laws enacted by Congress and to follow well-established principles when pursuing prosecutions related to cannabis activities.

Removed

As a result of the Sessions Memorandum, federal prosecutors are now free to utilize their prosecutorial discretion to decide whether to prosecute cannabis activities, despite the existence of state-level laws that may be inconsistent with federal prohibitions. No direction was given to federal prosecutors in the Sessions Memorandum as to the priority they should ascribe to such cannabis activities, and thus it is uncertain how active U.S. federal prosecutors will be in relation to such activities.

Removed

There can be no assurance that the federal government will not enforce federal laws relating to cannabis and seek to prosecute cases involving cannabis businesses that are otherwise compliant with state laws in the future. Mr. Sessions resigned as U.S. Attorney General on November 7, 2018. On February 14, 2019, William Barr was confirmed as U.S. Attorney General. On January 7, 2021, then President-elect Joe Biden announced his nomination of current Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Merrick Garland, to succeed Mr. Barr as the U.S. Attorney General. Merrick Garland was officially sworn in as Attorney General of the United States on March 11, 2021 and served until January 20, 2025. On November 21, 2024, then President-elect Donald Trump announced his nomination of Pamela Bondi to succeed Mr. Garland. Ms. Bondi was officially sworn in as U.S. Attorney General on February 5, 2025 following her confirmation from the Senate. It is unclear what impact this development will have on U.S. federal government enforcement policy.

Reworded

We may be subject to enforcement or other action by the U.S. federal government.

Added

U.S. federal authorities have the authority to investigate and take enforcement action against businesses involved in cannabis-related activities, including through the seizure or forfeiture of assets. Any such enforcement action could result in, among other things, the shutdown of some or all of our operations, the seizure or forfeiture of our cash or other assets, the loss or non-renewal of state-issued licenses, or the imposition of significant civil or criminal penalties.

Added

In addition, federal authorities could allege that we, our subsidiaries, or our directors, officers, employees, managers or investors have aided and abetted violations of federal law, conspired to violate federal law, or otherwise engaged in conduct subject to federal criminal or civil statutes in connection with our cannabis-related activities. Defending against any such proceedings could require substantial financial and management resources and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects, regardless of the outcome. Such enforcement actions could also have adverse consequences for our non-U.S. employees, directors, officers, or investors, including restrictions on travel to or entry into the United States.

Removed

Since the cultivation, processing, production, distribution and sale of cannabis for any purpose, medical, adult-use or otherwise, remain illegal under U.S. federal law, it is possible that we may be forced to cease activities. The U.S. federal government, through, among others, the DOJ, its sub-agency, the Drug Enforcement Administration (the “DEA”), and the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), has the right to actively investigate, audit and shut down cannabis growing facilities, processors and retailers. The U.S. federal government may also attempt to seize our property. Any action taken by the DOJ, the DEA and/or the IRS to interfere with, seize or shut down our operations will have an adverse effect on our business, prospects, revenue, results of operation and financial condition.

Removed

Because federal law criminalizing the use of cannabis preempts state laws that legalize its use, the federal government can assert criminal violations of federal law despite state laws permitting the use of cannabis. While it does not appear that federal law enforcement and regulatory agencies are focusing resources on licensed cannabis related businesses that are operating in compliance with state law, this could change at any time. Additionally, while the MORE Act was passed by the House of Representatives on December 4, 2020, it was not passed by the Senate prior to the end of the 116th Congress. An updated version was subsequently reintroduced in the House of Representatives on May 28, 2021. On September 30, 2021, the House Judiciary Committee voted to advance the MORE Act once again in a first step towards passage in the full House. Before it could become law, the MORE Act would need to be passed by the House of Representatives and Senate and then signed into law by the president. There is no guaranty that the MORE Act will become law in its current form, if at all. Additionally, as the rescission of the Cole Memorandum and the implementation of the Sessions Memorandum demonstrate, the DOJ may at any time issue additional guidance that directs federal prosecutors to devote more resources to prosecuting cannabis related businesses. If the DOJ under the Trump administration aggressively pursues financiers or equity owners of cannabis-related businesses, and U.S. Attorneys follow the DOJ policies through pursuing prosecutions, then we could face:

Removed

•seizure of our cash and other assets used to support or derived from our cannabis subsidiaries;

Removed

•the arrest of our employees, directors, officers, managers and investors;

Removed

•ancillary criminal violations of the Controlled Substances Act for aiding and abetting, and conspiracy to violate the Controlled Substances Act by providing financial support to cannabis companies that service or provide goods to state-licensed or permitted cultivators, processors, distributors and/or retailers of cannabis; and

Removed

•the barring of our employees, directors, officers, managers and investors who are not U.S. citizens from entry into the United States for life.

Removed

Because the Cole Memorandum was rescinded, the DOJ under the current or a future administration or an aggressive federal prosecutor could allege that us and our Board, our executive officers and, potentially, our stockholders, “aided and abetted” violations of federal law by providing finances and services to our portfolio cannabis companies. Under these circumstances, federal prosecutors could seek to seize our assets, and to recover the “illicit profits” previously distributed to stockholders resulting from any of our financing or services. In these circumstances, our operations would cease, stockholders may lose their entire investments and directors, officers and/or stockholders may be left to defend any criminal charges against them at their own expense and, if convicted, be sent to federal prison.

Removed

Additionally, there can be no assurance as to the position President Trump’s administration may take on cannabis, and the administration could decide to enforce the federal laws strongly. Any enforcement of current federal cannabis laws could cause significant financial damage to us and our stockholders. Further, the current or a future administration may choose to treat cannabis differently and potentially enforce the federal laws more aggressively.

Reworded

Violations of any federal laws andor regulationsregulations, or allegations of such violations, could result in significant fines, penalties, administrative sanctions, settlements, convictions or settlementsother arisingadverse fromconsequences, civil proceedings conducted by either the federal government or private citizens, or criminal charges, including, but not limited to,including disgorgement of profits, cessation of business activities or divestiture. TheseAny resultsof these outcomes could havematerially aand materialadversely adverse effect on us, includingaffect our reputationreputation, andour ability to conduct business, our holding (directlyownership or indirectly)operation of cannabis licenses in the United States,licenses, the listing of our Class A common stocksecurities on various stock exchanges, our financial position, operating results, profitability orcondition, liquidity and results of operations, or the market price of our shares of Class A common stock. In addition, it is difficult to estimate the time or resources that would be needed for the investigation or final resolution of any such matters because: (i) the time and resources that may be needed depend on the nature and extent of any information requested by the authorities involved, and (ii) such time or resources could be substantial.

Reworded

U.S. state and local regulation of cannabis is complex, evolving, and uncertain.

Reworded

Our activities are, and will continue to be, subject to evolving regulation and interpretation by various governmental authorities. The medical and adult-use cannabis industries are subject to various local, state and federal laws, regulations, guidelines, and licensing requirements relating to the manufacture, sale, distribution, management, transportation, storage, and disposal of cannabis, as well as being subject to laws and regulations relating to health and safety, the conduct of operations, and the protection of the environment. There is no assurance that state laws legalizing and regulating the sale and use of cannabis will not be repealed or overturned, or that local governmental authorities will not limit the applicability of state laws within their respective jurisdictions. Given the current regulatory environmentChanges in theapplicable Unitedlaws States,or regulations, or in their interpretation or enforcement, could restrict our operations, increase our compliance costs, limit our ability to expand into new risks may emerge, and management may not be able to predict all such risks. If the U.S. federal government begins to enforce U.S. federal laws relating to cannabis in states where the sale and use of cannabis is currently legal,markets, or ifadversely existing state laws are repealed or curtailed,affect our business or operations in those statesone or undermore those laws would be materially and adversely affected. Federal actions against any individual or entity engaged in the cannabis industry or a substantial repeal of cannabis related legislation could adversely affect us, our business and our assets or investments.states.

Reworded

As a result of the conflicting views between state legislatures and the federal government regarding cannabis, the rulemaking process at the state level that appliesapplicable to cannabis operators inat anythe state willand belocal level is ongoing and resultsubject into frequent changes.change. As a result, aMaintaining compliance programwith applicable regulatory requirements is essential to manage regulatory risk. All of our implemented operating policiesoperations, and procedures are compliance-based and are derived from the state regulatory structure governing ancillary cannabis businesses and their relationships to state-licensed or permitted cannabis operators, if any. Notwithstanding ourcompliance efforts and diligence, regulatory compliance and the process of obtaining and maintaining regulatory approvals can be costly and time-consuming. No assurance can be given that we will receiveobtain or will continue to hold the requisiteall licenses, permitspermits, or cardsapprovals required to operate our businesses as currently operated or as proposed to be operated in the future, or that we will be able to complete business transactions, including acquisitions or transfers of licenses, permits, cardslicenses or other property.regulated assets, on acceptable terms or at all.

Reworded

In addition, local laws and ordinances could restrict our business activity. Although our operations are legal under the laws of the states in which we operate, local governments have the ability to limit, restrict and ban cannabis businesses from operating within their jurisdiction. Land use, zoning, local ordinances and similar laws could be adopted or changedamended in a manner that materially and haveadversely a material adverse effect onaffects our business.

Reworded

Multiple states where medical and/or adult-use cannabis is legal have or are considering imposing special taxes or fees on businesses in the cannabis industry.industry It is uncertain at this time whetherand other states aremay adopt similar measures in the process of reviewing such additional taxes and fees.future. The implementation of special taxes or fees could have a material adverse effect upon our business, prospects, revenue, results of operation and financial condition.

Reworded

We are affected by theevolving and dynamic laws and regulations ofgoverning the industry.cannabis industry, which could adversely affect our business strategy, operating results, and profitability.

Added

The legal and regulatory framework governing the cannabis industry continues to evolve at the local, state, and federal levels. Even where current laws and regulations permit our operations, future legislative, regulatory or policy changes, or changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing requirements, could alter the structure, economics or competitive dynamics of the cannabis industry in ways that adversely affect our business. Such changes could require us to modify our business practices, adjust our operating model, or incur significant additional costs to enhance compliance programs, implement new systems or processes, obtain additional licenses or approvals, or respond to new regulatory requirements. Any increase in compliance or operational costs could reduce our operating margins, adversely affect our profitability, or limit our ability to pursue growth opportunities.

Added

Regulatory developments that are perceived as favorable to the cannabis industry, including federal legalization or other reform initiatives, could nevertheless have adverse effects on our business, including developments such as federal legalization, rescheduling, descheduling, the authorization of interstate commerce in cannabis, or other reform initiatives. Such developments could significantly alter the structure, economics and competitive dynamics of the markets in which we operate. For example, federal legalization or the introduction of interstate commerce could reduce or eliminate barriers to entry that currently exist under state-based regulatory regimes, including limitations on the number of licenses and vertical integration requirements. Such changes could permit new market participants, including well-capitalized domestic or international companies with established national distribution networks, recognized brands and substantial financial resources, to enter the cannabis industry. Increased competition could result in pricing pressure, margin compression, consolidation and loss of market share. In addition, the ability to transport cannabis products across state lines could disrupt supply and demand dynamics and adversely affect the economics of vertically integrated, in-state production models. Additionally, if cannabis were reclassified as a Schedule III substance under the CSA, we could face increased competition from new entrants, including large, well-capitalized companies operating in adjacent industries such as pharmaceuticals, tobacco and alcohol, which could further intensify competition and adversely affect our market position, pricing and margins.

Added

In addition, we face competition from illicit or unlicensed cannabis operators and from products marketed as hemp-derived cannabinoids pursuant to the 2018 Farm Bill. The illicit market for cannabis products remains significant in certain jurisdictions and may offer products at lower prices due to the absence of regulatory compliance costs, testing requirements, licensing obligations or state and local taxes applicable to licensed operators. Similarly, certain hemp-derived products, including products containing delta-8 tetrahydrocannabinol and other hemp-derived cannabinoids, are marketed and sold in certain jurisdictions outside of state-regulated cannabis frameworks based on interpretations of the 2018 Farm Bill. These products may be available through retail channels that are not subject to the same licensing, labeling, age-verification, product testing or taxation requirements applicable to state-licensed cannabis businesses. Competition from illicit operators or from hemp-derived products could place downward pressure on pricing, divert consumers from regulated markets, create consumer confusion, or otherwise adversely affect our sales, margins, market share or competitive position. Changes in federal or state regulation or enforcement practices relating to illicit cannabis activity or hemp-derived products may mitigate or exacerbate these competitive dynamics.

Added

The timing, scope and impact of future regulatory developments and enforcement priorities are difficult to predict. Our failure to anticipate or adapt to changes in the regulatory environment or competitive landscape could impair our ability to execute our business strategy, negatively affect our financial condition or results of operations, or otherwise materially and adversely affect our business.

Removed

The success of our business strategy depends on the legality of the cannabis industry. The constant evolution of laws and regulations affecting the cannabis industry could detrimentally affect us. Our current and proposed operations are subject to a variety of local, state and federal cannabis laws and regulations relating to the manufacture, management, transportation, storage and disposal of cannabis, as well as laws and regulations relating to consumable products health and safety, the conduct of operations and the protection of the environment. These laws and regulations are broad in scope and subject to evolving interpretations, which could require us to incur substantial costs associated with compliance or alter certain aspects of their business plans.

Removed

In addition, violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could disrupt certain aspects of our business plans and result in a material adverse effect on certain aspects of its planned operations. These laws and regulations are rapidly evolving and subject to change with minimal notice. Regulatory changes may adversely affect our profitability or cause us to cease operations entirely. If cannabis is legalized at the federal level, our business and operations could be negatively affected if such legalization permits cannabis to be transported or sold across state lines, which could disrupt wholesale pricing in states with high wholesale prices. The cannabis industry may come under the scrutiny or further scrutiny by the FDA, SEC, the DOJ, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority or other federal or applicable state or nongovernmental regulatory authorities or self-regulatory organizations that supervise or regulate the production, distribution, sale or use of cannabis for medical or adult-use purposes in the United States.

Removed

It is impossible to determine the extent of the impact of any new laws, regulations or initiatives that may be proposed, or whether any proposals will become law. The medical and adult-use cannabis industries are subject to significant regulatory change at both the state and federal level. The regulatory uncertainty surrounding the industries may adversely affect our business and operations, including without limitation, the costs to remain compliant with applicable laws and the impairment of its business or the ability to raise additional capital. In addition, we will not be able to predict the nature of any future laws, regulations, interpretations or applications, and it is possible that regulations may be enacted in the future that will be directly applicable to its business. For example, see “We may be subject to heightened scrutiny by Canadian regulatory authorities” below.

Reworded

State regulatory agencies may require us to post bonds, maintain large insurance policiespolicies, or post significant fees.

Reworded

There is a risk that a greater number of state regulatory agencies will begin requiring entities engaged in certain aspects of the legal cannabis industry to post a bond or significant fees when applying, for example, for a dispensary license or renewal as a guarantee of payment of sales and franchise taxes. We are not able to quantify at this time the potential scope of such bonds or fees in the states in which we currently operate or may in the future operate. Any bondssuch bonds, insurance requirements or feesfees, ofif material amountsmaterial, could have a negative impact on theour ultimatebusiness, successfinancial condition, results of ouroperations, business.or liquidity.

Reworded

Our Class A common stock is traded on the CSE. Our business, operations and investments are in the United States, and any future business, operations or investments, may become the subject of heightened scrutiny by regulators, stock exchanges and other authorities in Canada and the United States. As a result, we may be subject to significant direct and indirect interaction with public officials. There can be no assurance that this heightenedsuch scrutiny will not result in turn lead to the imposition of certainrestrictions restrictionsor conditions on our ability to operateoperate, invest, or investaccess capital markets in the United States or any other jurisdiction.jurisdictions.

Reworded

In 2017, there were concerns that the Canadian Depository for Securities Limited, through its subsidiary CDS Clearing and Depository Services Inc. (“CDS”), Canada’s central securities depository responsible for clearing and settling trades in the Canadian equity, fixed income and money markets, would refuse to settle trades for cannabis issuers that have investments in the United States. However,To date, CDS has not implemented this policy.

Reworded

On February 8, 2018, following discussions with the Canadian Securities Administrators and recognized Canadian securities exchanges, the TMX Group, which is the owner and operator of CDS, announced the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with Aequitas NEO Exchange Inc., the CSE, the Toronto Stock Exchange and the TSX Venture Exchange. The MOU outlines the parties’ understanding of Canada’s regulatory framework applicable to the rules, procedures and regulatory oversight of the exchanges and CDS as it relates to issuers with cannabis-related activities in the United States. The MOU confirms, with respect to the clearing of listed securities, that CDS relies on the Canadian securities exchanges to review the conduct of listed issuers.

Removed

The MOU notes that securities regulation requires that the rules of each of the exchanges must not be contrary to the public interest and that the rules of each of the exchanges have been approved by the securities regulators. Pursuant to the MOU, CDS will not ban accepting deposits of or transactions for clearing and settlement of securities of issuers with cannabis-related activities in the United States.

Reworded

Although the MOU indicated that there arewere no plans to banprohibit the clearing and settlement of securities throughof CDS,issuers with cannabis-related activities in the United States, there can be no guaranteeassurance that this regulatory approach to regulation will continue in the future. If suchclearing aor ban were implemented at a time when sharessettlement of our Class A common stock through CDS were restricted or prohibited while our shares are listed on a Canadian stock exchange, it would have a material adverse effect on the abilityliquidity of holders of shares ofour Class A common stock tocould makebe materially and settleadversely trades.affected, Inand particular,holders theof our shares ofcould Classexperience Adifficulty commoneffecting stockor wouldsettling become highly illiquid until an alternative (if available) was implemented, and investors would have no ability to effect a trade of shares of Class A common stocktrades through the facilities of the applicable Canadian stock exchange.

Added

Limitations on cannabis license ownership may constrain our growth and operational flexibility.

Removed

We may face limitations on ownership of cannabis licenses.

Reworded

In certain states, the cannabis laws and regulations limit not only the number of cannabis licenses and types of licenses issued, but also the number of cannabislicenses or types of licenses and types that onea single person or entity may own. We believe that, where such restrictions apply, the Company may still recognize revenue in the market through wholesale sales, exclusive marketing relations, the provision of managementown or support services, and joint ventures or similar contractual relationships with other operators to ensure continued compliance with the applicable regulatory guidelines.control. In addition, statessome mayjurisdictions require that certain qualified applicants or individuals participate in the ownership or control of the licensed entity. Such limitations on the ownership of additional licenses within certain states may limit our ability to expand in such states.entities.

Added

These ownership limitations may restrict our ability to expand our operations or consolidate licenses within a given state and may require us to rely on alternative arrangements, such as wholesale relationships, management or support services agreements, joint ventures, or other contractual structures, to participate in certain markets. Such arrangements may provide us with less control over operations, reduced economic benefits, increased regulatory complexity, or greater exposure to disputes or changes in regulatory interpretation.

Showing the first 60 of 276 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

52new paragraphs
68removed paragraphs
50reworded paragraphs
14,500 → 13,325words in section

New heading “Northeast Retail Partner Two Loan Agreement”

New heading “Northeast Retail Partner Four Loan Agreement”

New heading “Northeast Retail Partner Three Activity”

New heading “Settlement Expense”

New heading “Green Thumb Industries Arbitration Matter”

New heading “State of Ohio Complaint”

New heading “Uncertain Tax Positions”

Removed heading “Massachusetts Cultivation”

Removed heading “Detroit License”

Removed heading “Ohio Patient Access”

Removed heading “Illinois Licenses”

Removed heading “Variable Interest Entities”

Removed heading “January 2024 Loan Agreement”

Removed heading “February 2024 Loan Agreement”

Removed heading “MedMen NY Litigation”

Removed heading “Previous Matters”

Removed heading “Stockholder Dispute”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: default, penalt, covenant, regulation
“In February 2025, the Company entered into a loan agreement pursuant to which the Company may provide up to $2,500 of financing (the “February 2025 NJ Loan Agreement”) to a third party (“New Jersey Partnership Two”). Borrowings under the February 2025 NJ Loan Agreement are secured by substantially all of the assets and equity interests of the borrower and borrowings bear interest at a rate of 20% per annum. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: default, fine, covenant
“On September 29, 2025, certain of the Company’s subsidiaries (the “Borrowing Subsidiaries”) entered into a loan agreement and related promissory note with an aggregate principal amount of $9,345 (the “Mortgage Note”), which was borrowed in full. The Company anticipates utilizing the net proceeds for general corporate purposes, including to fund growth initiatives. The Mortgage Note matures on September 29, 2030 and borrowings thereunder bear interest at a rate of 8.5% per annum. Monthly payments of principal and interest commenced on November 1, 2025. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: fine, covenant, liquidity
“We are required to comply with two financial covenants under the 2021 Credit Agreement. Liquidity (defined as unrestricted cash and cash equivalents pledged under the 2021 Credit Facility plus any future revolving credit availability) may not be below $20,000 as of the last day of any fiscal quarter, and we may not permit the ratio of Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the 2021 Credit Agreement) to consolidated cash interest expense for any period of four consecutive fiscal quarters to be less than 2.50:1.00. The Company has a customary equity cure right for each of these financial covenants. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: default, penalt
“In January 2025, the Illinois Partnership entered into a definitive agreement to acquire a conditional adult-use license in Illinois, subject to regulatory approval. Total cash consideration for this transaction is $1,900, which is due at final closing and is subject to certain closing adjustments. In conjunction with this definitive agreement, the parties entered into certain management services agreements under which the Illinois Partnership will, subject to regulatory approval, provide certain management and advisory services for a set fee. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: default, covenant
“The Company recorded the Maryland Loan Receivable at an amortized cost basis of $12,622, which included a total of $595 of transaction-related expenses. The Company identified certain events of default and covenant violations, including non-payment, and provided an acceleration notice during the second quarter of 2023 that declared all amounts due and payable. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: covenant, liquidity, interest rate
“In January 2025, the July 2024 Loan Agreement was amended to modify certain terms and provisions, including that the minimum liquidity requirement is to be met as of the last day of each calendar month. The amended terms and provisions were not due to actual or anticipated covenant violations. Additionally, the Company borrowed an additional $15,000 through the issuance of additional term notes (the “January 2025 Term Notes”). …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (170)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 14 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Established in 2018 and headquartered in Morristown,Rochelle Park, New Jersey, AWH is a vertically integrated multi-state operator focused on adult-use or near-term adult-use cannabis states in limited license markets. Our core business is the cultivation, manufacturing, and distribution of cannabis consumer packaged goods, which we sell through our company-owned retail storesstores, to retail partner locations, and to third-party licensed retail cannabis stores.locations. We believe in bettering lives through cannabis. Our mission is to improve the lives of our employees, patients, customers, and the communities we serve through the use of the cannabis plant. We are committed to providing safe, reliable, and high-quality products and providing consumers options and education to ensure they are able to identify and obtain the products that fit their personal needs.

Reworded

Since our formation, we have expanded our operational footprint, primarily through acquisitions, and, as of December 31, 2024,2025, had direct or indirect operations or financial interests in seven United States geographic markets: Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. While we have been successful in opening cultivation facilities and dispensaries under our current licenses, we expect continued growth to be driven by opening dispensaries under our current licenses and through partnership opportunities, expansion of our current cultivation facilities, and increased consumer demand. We currently employ approximately 2,300 people.people, excluding employees of retail partner locations.

Reworded

Our consumer products portfolio is generated primarily from plant material that we grow and process ourselves. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we produce our consumer packaged goods in six manufacturing facilities with approximately 255,000258,000 square feet of total canopy. InDuring January 2024,2025, we enteredsold intoapproximately 225,000 pounds of wholesale product, on a definitivegross agreement,basis, which is pending regulatory approval,compared to acquire a cultivation license and a manufacturer license that we intend to use at a second cultivation site in Massachusetts to further expand our production capacity in that market. We added approximately 15,000187,000 squarepounds feet of total additional canopy with the additional site, which build out was largely completedsold during the second quarter of 2024, and anticipate the transaction will close in the first half of 2025.2024. Our product portfolio consists of a range of cannabis product categories including flower, pre-rolls, concentrates, vapes, edibles, and other cannabis-related products. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had 3947 open and operating retail locations, including 29 partner locations, and, subsequently re-opened our Detroit, Michigan dispensary for a total of 40 dispensaries as of March 1, 2025, including 2retail partner locations. We have fully-financed expansion plans to achieve a target of 60 total retail locations, including retail partner locations. Our new store opening plans are flexible and will ultimately depend on market conditions, local licensing, construction, and other regulatory permissions. Our expansion plans are subject to capital allocations decisions, the evolving regulatory environment, and the general economic environment.

Reworded

On NovemberDecember 22,19, 2022,2025, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-3 (the “Registration Statement”) containing a base shelf prospectus with the SEC (the “Shelf Prospectus”), which Registration Statement became effective on DecemberJanuary 22, 2022.2026. A corresponding base shelf prospectus (the “Canadian Prospectus”) was filed with, and receipted by, the securities regulatory authorities in each of the provinces and territories Canada under the U.S.-Canada multijurisdictional disclosure system (“MJDS”). The Registration Statement and Canadian Prospectus register and qualify the distributionoffer fromand treasurysale of up to an aggregate amount of $100,000$100 worthmillion of shares of Class A common stock, preferred stock, warrants, debt securities, subscription rights and/or units of the Company (“Securities”) for a period of three years. The terms of any Securities to be offered under the baseShelf prospectusProspectus and Canadian Prospectus will be specified in a prospectus supplement, which will be filed with the applicable U.S. and Canadian securities regulatory authorities in connection with any such offering. To date, no prospectus supplement has been filed. The Shelf Prospectus and the Canadian Prospectus were filed to provide maximumadditional flexibility to pursue strategic initiatives.

Added

•broadening our market presence with eight additional retail stores, including retail partner locations, for a total of 47 retail locations as of December 31, 2025;

Added

•expanding our product offering with the debut of two new brands, High Wired infused flower and Honor Roll top quality pre-rolls, and launching 566 SKUs, reflecting the expansion of formats, flavors, and formulations across nearly all product lines;

Added

•strengthening our capital structuring by fully prepaying a $60,000 term loan through the issuance of $50,000, in aggregate principal, of term loans, plus cash on hand, in addition to the closing of a financing arrangement with a principal amount of $9,345, as further described in “Liquidity and Capital Resources;” and

Removed

•completing the build out of a second cultivation facility in Massachusetts and adding an additional 15,000 square feet of canopy to further expand production capacity in that market;

Removed

•opening three dispensaries in Pennsylvania, opening our Cincinnati, Ohio flagship store, and providing support to two partnership dispensaries in Illinois;

Removed

•commencing non-medical sales at five dispensaries in Ohio; and

Reworded

•generating $73,292$38,053 of net cash from operating activities,activities and ending the year with $85,676 of cash and cash equivalents, as further described in “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Removed

Massachusetts Cultivation

Removed

In January 2024, the Company entered into a definitive agreement (the “Massachusetts Purchase Agreement”) to purchase a cultivation license and a manufacturer license from a third party in Massachusetts for a cash purchase price of $2,750, which total may be adjusted at closing, as provided in the Massachusetts Purchase Agreement and of which $1,500 was paid at signing and $1,250 was paid on October 1, 2024. The transfer of each license is subject to regulatory review and approval, which the Company anticipates occurring within the first half of 2025. The licenses were not associated with active operations at signing, but operations have since commenced. In conjunction with the Massachusetts Purchase Agreement, the parties also entered into a bridge loan which provides for the financing of certain covered expenses, at the sole discretion of the Company. This bridge loan bears interest based on the federal funds rate and, if not otherwise satisfied, is due on the fifth anniversary of the signing date. The parties also entered into an interim consulting services agreement, effective as of the signing date. The Company accounted for this transaction as an asset acquisition as of the signing date based on the provisions of the underlying agreements and allocated the cash consideration as the cost of the license acquired. The Company has also agreed to assume the lease for the associated location and to reimburse the seller for the security deposit at final closing. The Company recognized a lease liability and ROU asset of $761 as of the signing date. Direct transaction costs were not material. Refer to Note 4, “Acquisitions,” in the Financial Statements for additional information related to this transaction and to Note 10, “Leases,” for additional information regarding the Company’s leases.

Removed

Detroit License

Removed

In September 2024, the Company acquired 49% of the member interests of an entity (the “Detroit License Holder”) that received conditional approval for an adult-use license in Detroit, Michigan (the “Detroit License”). The Detroit License was not associated with active operations as of the closing date and the Detroit License Holder had no other active operations as of that date. The Company transferred the Detroit License to its existing dispensary in Detroit, Michigan, which re-opened in February 2025. The Company paid $850 of cash consideration at closing and the sellers may receive up to an additional $2,250 based upon the achievement of certain levels of sales during a specified twelve month period following the commencement of adult-use sales at the dispensary. The underlying agreement provides the Company with an option to acquire the remaining ownership interests in the Detroit License Holder, after such is permissible by applicable regulations, for no additional consideration. The parties also entered into a management services agreement, pursuant to which the Company is providing management and advisory services for a set monthly fee, which is expected to expire upon the Company’s exercise of the option.

Removed

The Company determined that the Detroit License Holder is a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and the Company became the primary beneficiary as of the closing date; therefore, the Detroit License Holder is consolidated as a VIE. The transaction consideration of $1,140 was allocated to the license acquired and consisted of the $850 of cash consideration plus the initial estimated fair value of the contingent consideration of $290. The Company determined the fair value of any noncontrolling interest is de minimis. Refer to Note 4, “Acquisitions,” in the Financial Statements for additional information related to this transaction and to Note 8, “Variable Interest Entities,” for additional information regarding the Company’s VIEs.

Removed

Ohio Patient Access

Removed

On August 12, 2022, the Company entered into a definitive agreement (the “Ohio Agreement”) that provides the Company the option to acquire 100% of the equity of Ohio Patient Access LLC (“OPA”), the holder of a license that grants it the right to operate three medical dispensaries in Ohio. The Ohio Agreement is subject to regulatory review and approval. Once the regulatory approval is received, the Company may exercise the option, and the exercise is solely within the Company’s control. The Company anticipates exercising the option prior to the March 22, 2026 amended expiration date. Under the Ohio Agreement, the Company will also acquire the real property of the three dispensary locations. OPA had not yet commenced operations as of the signing date, but subsequently opened two dispensaries in December 2023 and a third in January 2024. The Company determined that OPA is a VIE and the Company became the primary beneficiary as of the signing date; therefore, OPA is consolidated as a VIE.

Removed

The Ohio Agreement also includes an earn-out provision of $7,300 that was dependent upon the commencement of adult-use cannabis sales in Ohio and which the sellers could elect to receive as either cash or shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, or a combination thereof. The sellers elected to receive the payment in cash and such payment was made in July 2024. The parties amended the Ohio Agreement in June 2024 to incorporate certain provisions regarding evolving regulations in Ohio, including that the Company will, upon final closing of the Ohio Agreement, receive two additional adult-use licenses that are expected to be awarded to OPA. Refer to Note 4, “Acquisitions,” in the Financial Statements for additional information regarding this transaction and refer to Note 8, “Variable Interest Entities,” for additional information regarding the Company’s VIEs.

Removed

Illinois Licenses

Removed

In August 2022, the Company entered into definitive agreements to acquire two additional licenses in Illinois for a combined total cash consideration of $11,100. Operations at one of the locations commenced during the second quarter of 2023 and the final closing occurred in April 2024. Operations at the second location commenced during the fourth quarter of 2023 and final closing occurred in July 2024. Refer to Note 4, “Acquisitions,” in the Financial Statements for additional information related to these transactions.

Removed

Variable Interest Entities

Removed

January 2024 Loan Agreement

Removed

In January 2024, the Company entered into a loan agreement pursuant to which the Company may provide, at its sole discretion, up to $2,500 of financing (the “January 2024 Loan Agreement’) to a third party (the “New Jersey Partnership”). The January 2024 Loan Agreement contains certain provisions and restrictive covenants that provide the Company with operational and financial influence over the underlying entity and also provides the Company with financial distributions based on the underlying associated results of operations. Additionally, the January 2024 Loan Agreement provides the Company with conversion options to obtain 35% of the equity interests of the borrower upon the initial funding (which occurred in January 2024) and up to an additional 65% of the remaining equity interest of the borrower at any time through October 2033, subject to certain provisions and regulatory approvals. The Company determined that the terms and provisions of the January 2024 Loan Agreement create a variable interest in the New Jersey Partnership and met the criteria for consolidation as of such date. The New Jersey Partnership received a conditional license approval for one dispensary in New Jersey that was determined to have a fair value of $1,050, which approximated the fair value of the non-controlling interest held by the New Jersey Partnership as of the effective date. The non-controlling interest received a distribution during 2024 in accordance with the provisions of the January 2024 Loan Agreement. The net loss attributable to the non-controlling interest was not significant during 2024. Since the New Jersey Partnership is consolidated as a VIE, the intercompany activity related to the January 2024 Loan Agreement is eliminated in consolidation. Refer to Note 8, “Variable Interest Entities,” in the Financial Statements for additional information regarding the Company’s VIEs.

Removed

February 2024 Loan Agreement

Removed

In February 2024, the Company entered into a loan agreement pursuant to which the Company may provide financing (the “February 2024 Loan Agreement”) at its sole discretion to a third party (the “Illinois Partnership”). The February 2024 Loan Agreement initially provided for up to $3,750 of financing, but was amended in July 2024 to increase the funding amount based on the Company’s sole discretion at such a time that the borrower requests additional funding. The parties also entered into a support services agreement under which the Company will provide management and advisory services for a set monthly fee. The terms of the February 2024 Loan Agreement contain certain provisions and restrictive covenants that provide the Company with operational and financial influence over the underlying entity. The February 2024 Loan Agreement provides the Company with the option to convert the outstanding balance into equity interests of the borrower, up to 100%, as may be permissible by applicable regulations at such time. The Company determined that the terms and provisions of the February 2024 Loan Agreement and support services agreement create a variable interest in the Illinois Partnership and met the criteria for consolidation as of such date. The Illinois Partnership held no assets at the time the agreements were entered into and the non-controlling interest was determined to have a de minimis fair value as of that date. The net loss attributable to the non-controlling interest was not significant during 2024. Since the entity is consolidated as a VIE, the intercompany activity related to the February 2024 Loan Agreement and the related support services agreement is eliminated in consolidation.

Reworded

RecentMidwest Retail Partner One Activity

Removed

Effective in April 2024, the Illinois Partnership acquired two dispensaries in the greater Chicago, Illinois area (the “Chicago Partner Dispensaries”). The parties entered into interim management services agreements (“MSAs”) pursuant to which the Illinois Partnership will advise on certain business, operational, and financial matters for a monthly fee (the “Illinois MSAs”) while the parties finalize asset purchase agreements to acquire the underlying dispensaries. The total purchase price of approximately $10,000 of cash consideration is subject to certain closing adjustments. An initial deposit of $1,500 was remitted during the first quarter of 2024. The remainder of $8,500 was remitted to escrow during the second quarter of 2024 and remained in escrow as of December 31, 2024. Based on the provisions of the Illinois MSAs, the Illinois Partnership obtained operational and financial influence over the dispensaries and therefore recognized the transaction as a business combination as of the April 2024 regulatory approval date of the Illinois MSAs. The asset purchase agreements in respect of the Chicago Partner Dispensaries are subject to regulatory review and approval. Refer to Note 4, “Acquisitions,” for additional information related to this transaction and to Note 8, “Variable Interest Entities,” for additional information regarding the Company’s VIEs.

Reworded

In December 2024, Midwest Retail Partner One, a consolidated VIE, as further described in Note 8, “Variable Interest Entities,” in the IllinoisFinancial PartnershipStatements, entered into a definitive agreement to acquire the membership interests of an entity that anticipates receiving two adult-use licenseslicenses, inwhich Illinois,agreement is subject to regulatory approval. In conjunction with this definitive agreement, the parties entered into certain management services agreements under(“MSAs”) pursuant to which theMidwest IllinoisRetail PartnershipPartner will,One subject to regulatory review and approval,will provide certain management and advisory services for a set fee. These MSAs were subject to regulatory review and approval, which was received in February 2025. Based on the provisions of the agreements, Midwest Retail Partner One obtained operational and financial influence over the underlying entity and therefore recognized the transaction as an asset acquisition as of the February 2025 regulatory approval date of these MSAs. Total cash consideration for this transaction may be up to $4,000, subject to certain closing adjustmentsadjustments, andwhich was allocated to the licenses acquired as of whichthe effective date. Of the total consideration, $1,000 was paid at signing in December 2024 and is included within “Other non-current assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet in the Financial Statements as of December 31, 2024. A total of up to $1,500 mayis expected to be paid upon opening of the associated dispensary locations and a total of up to $1,500 mayis expected to be paid upon final closing of the associated transaction. The total of the remaining payments is included as a sellers’ note; refer to Note 11, “Debt” in the Financial Statements. Additionally, the Company recorded an acquisition-related deferred tax liability of $1,755, which was allocated to the license as additional cost basis as of the effective date. One of the dispensary locations opened in March 2026. Refer to Note 4, “Acquisitions,” and to Note 8, “Variable Interest Entities,” for additional information.

Added

In January 2025, Midwest Retail Partner One entered into a definitive agreement to acquire a conditional adult-use license, which agreement is subject to regulatory approval. Total cash consideration for this transaction is $1,900, to be paid at final closing and subject to certain closing adjustments. In October 2025, the parties amended the definitive agreement to, among other provisions, reduce the total cash consideration by $150 and advance $450 at that time. In conjunction with this definitive agreement, the parties entered into certain MSAs under which Midwest Retail Partner One will provide certain management and advisory services for a set fee. The parties also entered into a working capital loan and security agreement, under which Midwest Retail Partner One may loan up to $3,650 for the build-out of the associated dispensary. Based on the provisions of the MSAs and working capital loan, Midwest Retail Partner One obtained operational and financial influence over the underlying assets as of the February 2025 regulatory approval date of the MSAs. As such, this transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition as of that date and the total consideration was allocated as the cost of the license acquired. The payment due at closing is included as a sellers’ note; refer to Note 11, “Debt” in the Financial Statements. The associated dispensary opened in May 2025 and the Company anticipates that closing of the transaction may occur in the first half of 2026. Refer to Note 4, “Acquisitions,” and to Note 8, “Variable Interest Entities,” for additional information.

Added

Effective in March 2025, Midwest Retail Partner One acquired an entity that owns and operates an adult-use dispensary (“Midwest Partnership Dispensary Three”) and also entered into a related MSA pursuant to which Midwest Retail Partner One will provide certain management and advisory services for a set fee while the underlying transaction is pending regulatory approval. Based on the provisions of this MSA, Midwest Retail Partner One obtained operational and financial influence over Midwest Partnership Dispensary Three and therefore recognized the transaction as a business combination as of the March 2025 regulatory approval date of this MSA. Total cash consideration for this transaction is $1,667, of which $833 was payable upon the regulatory approval of the MSA and the remainder is due at final closing, subject to certain closing adjustments. This agreement also provides for an earn-out payment, to be paid in cash, based on 3.2-times EBITDA (as defined) that is achieved during a specified twelve-month period, less the purchase price, and had an initial fair value estimate of $1,600. Refer to Note 4, “Acquisitions,” and to Note 8, “Variable Interest Entities,” for additional information.

Added

Effective in May 2025, Midwest Retail Partner One acquired an entity that owns and operates an adult-use dispensary (“Midwest Partnership Dispensary Four”) and also entered into a related MSA under which Midwest Retail Partner One will provide certain management and advisory services for a set fee while the underlying transaction is pending regulatory approval. Based on the provisions of this MSA, Midwest Retail Partner One obtained operational and financial influence over Midwest Partnership Dispensary Four and therefore recognized the transaction as a business combination as of the May 2025 regulatory approval date of this MSA. Total cash consideration for this transaction is $3,333, of which $1,667 was paid upon the regulatory approval of the MSA and the remainder will be due at final closing, subject to certain closing adjustments. This agreement also provides for an earn-out payment, to be paid in cash, based on 3.2-times EBITDA (as defined) that is achieved during a specified twelve-month period, less the purchase price, and had an initial fair value estimate of $1,900. Refer to Note 4, “Acquisitions,” and to Note 8, “Variable Interest Entities,” for additional information.

Added

Northeast Retail Partner Two Loan Agreement

Added

In February 2025, the Company and a third party (“Northeast Retail Partner Two”) entered into a loan agreement pursuant to which the Company may provide to Northeast Retail Partner Two up to $2,500 of financing (the “Northeast Retail Partner Two Loan Agreement”). The Company has a direct equity ownership interest of 35% of the equity interests in the borrower and the Northeast Retail Partner Two Loan Agreement provides the Company with conversion options to obtain up to 100% at any time through the maturity date, subject to certain provisions and as may be permitted by applicable regulations. The Northeast Retail Partner Two Loan Agreement also contains certain provisions and restrictive covenants that provide the Company with operational and financial influence over Northeast Retail Partner Two and provides the Company with financial distributions based on the associated results of operations. The Company determined that the terms and provisions of the Northeast Retail Partner Two Loan Agreement create a variable interest in Northeast Retail Partner Two and met the criteria for consolidation as of such date.

Added

The Company and Northeast Retail Partner Two entered into a definitive agreement to acquire an entity that received licensing approvals for the operation of an adult-use dispensary for a total of $650 of cash consideration. This agreement is subject to regulatory approval, which is expected to be received within the first half of 2026, subject to the discretion of the applicable regulatory authorities. The consideration was allocated to the cost of the license, of which $250 was paid at signing. The remaining $400 was due at the earlier of: (i) the first sale of cannabis at the associated dispensary, or (ii) the one year anniversary of the agreement date, and, accordingly, was paid upon the one year anniversary in February 2026. This amount is included as a sellers’ note as of December 31, 2025; refer to Note 11, “Debt,” in the Financial Statements. Additionally, the Company recorded an acquisition-related deferred tax liability of $285, which was allocated to the license as additional cost basis as of the effective date. The Company will also assume the lease associated with the anticipated dispensary location. The non-controlling interest was determined to have a de minimis fair value and the net loss attributable to the non-controlling interest was not significant during 2025. Since the entity is consolidated as a VIE, the intercompany activity related to the Northeast Retail Partner Two Loan Agreement is eliminated in consolidation. Refer to Note 8, “Variable Interest Entities,” in the Financial Statements for additional information.

Added

Northeast Retail Partner Four Loan Agreement

Added

In March 2025, the Company and a third party (“Northeast Retail Partner Four”) entered into a loan agreement pursuant to which the Company may provide to Northeast Retail Partner Four up to $2,500 of financing (the “Northeast Retail Partner Four Loan Agreement”). The Company has a direct equity ownership interest of 35% of the equity interests in the borrower and the Northeast Retail Partner Four Loan Agreement and associated agreements provide the Company with conversion options to obtain up to 100% at any time through the maturity date, subject to certain provisions and as may be permitted by applicable regulations. The Northeast Retail Partner Four Loan Agreement also contains provisions and restrictive covenants that provide the Company with operational and financial influence over Northeast Retail Partner Four and the underlying operating agreement provides the Company with financial distributions based on the associated results of operations. The Company determined that the terms and provisions of the Northeast Retail Partner Four Loan Agreement and associated agreements create a variable interest in Northeast Retail Partner Four and met the criteria for consolidation as of such date. The non-controlling interest was determined to have a de minimis fair value. Since the entity is consolidated as a VIE, the intercompany activity related to the Northeast Retail Partner Four Loan Agreement is eliminated in consolidation.

Added

The Company and Northeast Retail Partner Four entered into a definitive agreement to acquire an entity that received licensing approvals for the operation of an adult-use dispensary, subject to regulatory approval which is expected to be received within twelve to eighteen months following the signing date, for a total of $1,500 of cash consideration. Of the total consideration, $250 was paid as a deposit during the fourth quarter of 2024 and was included within “Other current assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in the Financial Statements as of December 31, 2024, $250 was paid at signing, and the remaining $1,000 will be paid at final closing and is included as a sellers’ note; refer to Note 11, “Debt” in the Financial Statements. The Company will also assume the lease associated with the dispensary location. Of the total consideration, $1,383 was allocated to the cost of the license as of the effective date and $117 was allocated to the security deposit for the associated lease, which had a lease liability and ROU asset of $872 and is classified as a finance lease; refer to Note 10, “Leases,” for additional information regarding the Company’s lease arrangements. Additionally, the Company recorded an acquisition-related deferred tax liability of $607, which was allocated to the license as additional cost basis as of the effective date. The net loss attributable to the non-controlling interest was not significant during the year ended December 31, 2025. Refer to Note 8, “Variable Interest Entities,” in the Financial Statements for additional information.

Added

Northeast Retail Partner Three Activity

Added

In May 2025, a consolidated VIE of the Company (“Northeast Retail Partner Three”) entered into a definitive agreement to acquire an adult-use dispensary (“Northeast Partnership Dispensary One”). The parties also entered into a consulting agreement under which Northeast Retail Partner Three will provide management and advisory services for a set fee, which became effective in June 2025 and will remain in place until regulatory approval of the definitive agreement is received and the underlying transaction thereby closes. Based on the provisions of this consulting agreement, Northeast Retail Partner Three obtained operational and financial influence over Northeast Partnership Dispensary One and therefore recognized the transaction as a business combination as of the June 2025 effective date of this consulting agreement. Total cash consideration for Northeast Partnership Dispensary One is $3,250, of which $813 was paid at signing and the remainder was paid at final closing in December 2025. Refer to Note 4, “Acquisitions,” and to Note 8, “Variable Interest Entities,” for additional information.

Added

In September 2025, Northeast Retail Partner Three acquired an entity that owns and operates two adult-use dispensaries (“Northeast Partnership Dispensaries Two and Three”), which transaction was completed pursuant to a definitive agreement that was signed in February 2025 and was subject to certain closing conditions, including regulatory approval of the underlying transaction, which was received prior to closing. The purchase price consists of $7,850 of cash consideration, subject to certain working capital and other customary adjustments, and of which $250 was paid as a deposit at signing. Total cash consideration included the settlement of $4,779 related to an outstanding note with a principal balance of $4,100 and associated interest. As of the closing date, the Company paid $1,541, which included an initial working capital estimate of $1,040. In December 2025, the parties agreed to a revised working capital estimate, including repayment of $1,598 for certain pre-acquisition liabilities, that reduced this estimate by $2,609, with the resulting net estimate of $289 included within “Other current assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2025. The final working capital adjustment and any resulting payment is due on the one-year anniversary of closing. This transaction also provides for an earn-out payment, payable in cash, in an amount equal to the lesser of $2,000 or three times the Annual EBITDA (as defined) during the one-year period following closing. The initial fair value estimate of $1,800 for this earn-out was determined utilizing an income approach based on a probability-weighted estimate of the future payment discounted using the Company’s estimated incremental borrowing rate and is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Refer to Note 4, “Acquisitions,” and to Note 8, “Variable Interest Entities,” for additional information.

Added

Other Activity

Added

In August 2025, the Company acquired a conditional adult-use license for $2,000 of cash consideration. This transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition as of the effective date and the total cash consideration was allocated as the cost of the license acquired. Of the total cash consideration, $1,000 was paid to the seller as of the effective date and the remainder was remitted to escrow, to be released to the seller upon regulatory approval of the underlying license transfer, which remains pending. The Company also assumed the lease for the associated dispensary location which had a lease liability and ROU asset of $1,710 as of the effective date and is classified as a finance lease; refer to Note 10, “Leases,” for additional information regarding the Company’s leases. Additionally, the Company recorded an acquisition-related deferred tax liability of $878, which was allocated to the license as additional cost basis as of the effective date. Direct transaction costs were not material. Refer to Note 4, “Acquisitions,” for additional information.

Added

In September 2025, the Company exercised an option to acquire Ohio Patient Access, LLC (“OPA”), pursuant to a definitive agreement that was entered into in 2022, as amended (the “Ohio Agreement”). As further described in Note 4, “Acquisitions,” the related transaction closed in October 2025 and the Company remitted $7,000 of the remaining consideration at that time. The remaining $2,000 of total transaction consideration will be remitted upon the final transfer of each of two additional licenses that OPA was subsequently awarded, which transfer is expected to occur after the related dispensary locations open.

Reworded

•Revenue increaseddecreased by $43,009,$61,018, or 8%,11%, during 2024,2025, as compared to 2023,2024, primarily driven by expansiondeclines across our legacy business resulting from increased competition and pricing pressure in most of our cultivationmarkets, activitiespartially andoffset by incremental revenue from acquisitions,acquisitions partiallyand offsetconsolidated bypartnership declines in certain legacy markets due to increased competition.activity.

Reworded

•Operating profitloss was $4,734$17,012 during 2024,2025, as compared to an operating lossprofit of $3,619$4,734 during 2023.2024. TheOur improvementresults for 2025 include a $17,000 settlement expense related to an arbitration matter (refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations–Legal Matters–Green Thumb Industries Arbitration Matter” for additional information). Additionally, the current year was primarily drivenimpacted by thelower expansion of wholesale production and leveraging of existing infrastructure,revenue, partially offset by slightlyimproved margins, which were largely attributable to certain strategic initiatives implemented during the second half of 2024, and higher general and administrative expenses attributable to certain one-time costs, including expenses associated with our debt refinancing and other strategic initiatives.

Reworded

•Net increasedecrease in cash and cash equivalents of $15,746$2,578 during 2024,2025, primarily driven by a benefitresulting from theinvestments timing and amount of tax payments, including certain tax refunds received, as well as the timing and management of payments related to workingin capital activities,assets partially offset byand payments associated with acquisitions, investmentsoffset by funding provided by improvements in working capital assets,management and costsnet associatedproceeds withfrom ourthe debtissuance refinancing.of debt.

Added

Revenue decreased by $61,018, or 11%, during 2025, as compared to 2024. Revenue across legacy dispensary locations declined by $62,998, primarily driven by softness in Illinois, New Jersey, and Massachusetts that was partially offset by a benefit from adult-use sales in Ohio which began during the third quarter of 2024. Additionally, the decrease was partially offset by a contribution of $22,474 of incremental revenue from partner stores and by $7,850 of incremental revenue from new store openings that occurred in the second half of 2024 that were associated with previously acquired licenses. Our consolidated results include 47 dispensaries as of December 31, 2025, compared to 39 as of December 31, 2024. Net revenue from our wholesale operations declined by $28,344 resulting from increased competition and price compression across certain markets, particularly in Illinois and New Jersey, as well as from an increased focus on selling products through Company-owned and partner stores. During 2025, we sold approximately 225,000 pounds of wholesale product, on a gross basis, compared to approximately 187,000 pounds sold during 2024.

Removed

Revenue increased by $43,009, or 8%, during 2024, as compared to 2023. Our revenue growth was primarily driven by $41,944 of incremental net revenue from our wholesale operations, in large part as a result of expansion across the markets in which we operate, particularly in New Jersey and Massachusetts. During 2024, we sold approximately 187,000 pounds of wholesale product, on a gross basis, compared to approximately 145,000 pounds sold during 2023. Additionally, we recognized $53,729 of incremental revenue from acquisitions, including $17,583 from the Devi Maryland acquisition that occurred during the second quarter of 2023 and benefited from the commencement of adult-use sales during the third quarter of 2023. This incremental increase was also driven by new store openings in 2024 and late 2023 associated with previously acquired licenses, including a benefit from the commencement of non-medical sales in Ohio, as well as a contribution of $4,000 of incremental revenue from partner stores. We had 39 open dispensaries as of December 31, 2024, compared to 34 as of December 31, 2023. These increases were offset by a decrease of $52,664 across our legacy locations, primarily in Illinois and New Jersey due to increased competition in those markets.

Reworded

Cost of goods sold increaseddecreased by $13,919,$46,488, or 4%,12%, during 2024,2025, as compared to 2023.2024. Cost of goods sold represents direct and indirect expenses attributable to the production of wholesale products as well as direct expenses incurred in purchasing products from other wholesalers. Gross profit for 20242025 was $184,210,$169,680, representing a gross margin of 32.8%,33.9%, compared to gross profit of $155,120$184,210 and gross margin of 29.9%32.8% for 2023.2024. Gross margin forin the current year benefitedbenefitted from expandedimproved realization at certain cultivation facilities and better production andoutput improved utilization atacross our New Jersey cultivation facilityfacilities, primarily Illinois and expansionMassachusetts, and a benefit from a higher volume of wholesaleCompany-produced salesproducts insold thatthrough market,our retail stores and partner stores, partially offset by increased competition and pricing pressure across most of our markets, particularly in certainNew retailJersey markets.and Illinois. The current year alsoincludes benefiteda $9,855 benefit from $13,491a rebalancing of loweroverhead expenses at certain cultivation locations from cost of goods sold to general and administrative expenses based on overhead allocations relative to production output at those locations, but was impacted by $13,003 of higher write-downs of certain inventory items thatrelated wereto largelynet drivenrealizable byvalue pricingadjustments, pressureexpired inproducts, theand priorobsolete year.packaging.

Reworded

General and administrative expenses increaseddecreased by $20,737,$9,784, or 13%,5%, during 2024,2025, as compared to 2023.2024. The increasedecrease was primarily related to:

Added

•a $10,265 decrease in total compensation expense, including $9,670 lower equity-based compensation expense that was largely due to the acceleration of certain awards in the prior year, offset by the forfeiture of other awards, compared with slightly higher headcount in the current year due to the expansion of consolidated operations;

Added

•the absence of a $5,447 estimated reserve recognized in the prior year related to certain amounts that the Company was working to recover that were associated with a previous transaction; and

Removed

•$6,203 of higher professional services fees, including expenses associated with our debt refinancing and other projects and strategic initiatives;

Removed

•a $5,447 increase in an estimated reserve related to certain amounts associated with a previous transaction (refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations–Legal Matters–MedMen NY Litigation” for additional information)

Removed

•$5,445 of higher depreciation and amortization expense due to $3,285 of incremental amortization of intangible assets driven by prior year acquisitions and $2,160 of incremental depreciation expense due to a larger average balance of fixed assets in service;

Reworded

•the absence of a $2,083 reserve and a $984 discount recognized on a long-term receivable in the prior year;

Added

•a $1,250 benefit from a purchase price adjustment recognized in the current year that was related to a previous acquisition; and

Added

•a net benefit of $647 related to fair value adjustments associated with acquisition earn-outs, compared to a net expense of $630 in the prior year.

Added

These decreases were partially offset by:

Showing the first 60 of 170 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-08-12 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-05-13 (period ending 2026-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

0new paragraphs
0removed paragraphs
4reworded paragraphs
422 → 480words in section

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Reworded

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

The legal basis for the April 2026 Order is expectedsubject to be challenged inactive litigation. If the April 2026 Order is enjoined, narrowed, or vacated, tax positions or operational decisions we take in reliance on it may be reversed, and we could be required to amend tax filings, recognize additional tax liabilities, or modify our compliance programs. Additionally, while the IRS has indicated that forthcoming guidance regarding the April 2026 Order will include clarification on activity-based allocation and apportionment, the specific details and timing of such guidance remain unclear. Accordingly, our cost allocations between IRC Section 280E-exempt medical and IRC Section 280E non-exempt adult-use operations may be subject to tax audit challenges.
see in full comparison
Reworded

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

The DEA hasrecently commencedconducted a separate administrative hearing process to consider the broader rescheduling of all cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III. The timingoutcome and outcomeoverall timing of the conclusion of that process are uncertain, and any resulting rule may be subject to litigation. Until a broader rescheduling rule is final and effective, our adult-use cannabis operations may remain subject to the limitations of IRC Section 280E and the other risks of federal Schedule I status described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (4)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

We are subject to risks and uncertainties relating to the April 23, 2026 order issued by the U.S. Department of Justice rescheduling certain medical cannabis to Schedule III (the “April 2026 Order”) and the related pending DEA administrative proceedings concerning broader cannabis rescheduling.

Reworded

The Company’s revenue is derived from sales of both medical and adult-use cannabis operations.cannabis. The April 2026 Order does not address adult-use cannabis, which remains federally illegal under the Controlled Substances Act. Accordingly, any benefits of the April 2026 Order to our business, including potential relief from IRC Section 280E with respect to our medical cannabis operations, may be materially smaller than those realized by competitors with predominantly medical-only operations, while the operational, regulatory, and legal risks associated with the federal illegality of adult-use cannabis remain unchanged.

Reworded

The legal basis for the April 2026 Order is expectedsubject to be challenged inactive litigation. If the April 2026 Order is enjoined, narrowed, or vacated, tax positions or operational decisions we take in reliance on it may be reversed, and we could be required to amend tax filings, recognize additional tax liabilities, or modify our compliance programs. Additionally, while the IRS has indicated that forthcoming guidance regarding the April 2026 Order will include clarification on activity-based allocation and apportionment, the specific details and timing of such guidance remain unclear. Accordingly, our cost allocations between IRC Section 280E-exempt medical and IRC Section 280E non-exempt adult-use operations may be subject to tax audit challenges.

Reworded

The DEA hasrecently commencedconducted a separate administrative hearing process to consider the broader rescheduling of all cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III. The timingoutcome and outcomeoverall timing of the conclusion of that process are uncertain, and any resulting rule may be subject to litigation. Until a broader rescheduling rule is final and effective, our adult-use cannabis operations may remain subject to the limitations of IRC Section 280E and the other risks of federal Schedule I status described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

28new paragraphs
12removed paragraphs
42reworded paragraphs
8,292 → 10,150words in section

New heading “2026 Acquisitions”

New heading “Interest Expense”

New heading “Income Tax Expense”

New heading “RESULTS OF OPERATIONS”

New heading “Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared with the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”

New heading “Cost of Goods Sold and Gross Profit”

New heading “General and Administrative Expenses”

Removed heading “Subsequent Transactions”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: default, covenant
“In August 2026, the Company entered into a loan agreement pursuant to which it may provide up to $2,500 to a third party, which was funded in full. Borrowings under this loan agreement bear interest at a rate of 20% per annum and are secured by substantially all of the then-current and future assets and equity interests of the borrower. This loan agreement has a ten-year maturity, provides for customary events of default, and contains certain covenants and other restrictions. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: write-down, competition
“Cost of goods sold decreased by $21,670, or 12%, during the six months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. Gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was $90,373, representing a gross margin of 37.2%, compared to gross profit of $80,953 and gross margin of 31.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2025. Gross margin in the current year benefitted from a higher volume of Company-produced products sold through our retail stores and retail partner locations, as well as an increased focus on higher-margin products. …”
see in full comparison
New text
“Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared with the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”
see in full comparison
New text topics: fine
“In April 2026, Northeast Retail Partner Seven (as defined in Note 8, “Variable Interest Entities” in the Financial Statements) entered into a definitive agreement to acquire two adult-use dispensaries (“Northeast Partnership Dispensaries Seven and Eight”), which agreement is subject to regulatory approval. The parties also entered into a consulting agreement under which Northeast Retail Partner Seven will provide management and advisory services for a set fee. …”
see in full comparison
New text
“Cost of Goods Sold and Gross Profit”
see in full comparison
New text
“General and Administrative Expenses”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (82)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 2 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

The following management discussion and analysis, which we refer to as the “MD&A,” of the financial condition and results of operations of Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. (the “Company,” “AWH,” or “Ascend”) is for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025. It is supplemental to, and should be read in conjunction with, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, and the accompanying notes thereto, (the “Financial Statements”) appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Quarterly Report” or “Form 10-Q”) and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 (the “Annual Report”), which has been filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and with the relevant Canadian securities regulatory authorities under its profile on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval Plus (“SEDAR+”). The Financial Statements and Annual Report were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which we refer to as “U.S. GAAP.”

Reworded

Since our formation, we have expanded our operational footprint, primarily through acquisitions, and, as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, had direct or indirect operations or financial interests in seven United States geographic markets: Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. While we have been successful in opening cultivation facilities and dispensaries under our current licenses, we expect continued growth to be driven by opening dispensaries under our current licenses and through partnership opportunities, expansion of our current cultivation facilities, and increased consumer demand. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we employed approximately 2,3002,200 people, excluding employees of retail partner locations.

Added

Our consumer products portfolio is generated primarily from plant material that we grow and process ourselves. We have current production capacity across five manufacturing facilities with approximately 230,000 square feet of total canopy. This total excludes approximately 30,000 square feet of canopy associated with the Company’s Lansing, Michigan facility, which was temporarily closed at the end of the second quarter of 2026 for remediation activities related to a fire incident at the site that was contained. The Company does not anticipate this temporary closure will have a material impact on its Michigan business.

Reworded

OurDuring consumerthe productsthree portfolioand issix generatedmonths primarilyended fromJune plant30, material2026 thatand 2025, we growsold a total of approximately 63,000 and process ourselves. As of March 31, 2026, we produce our consumer packaged goods in six manufacturing facilities with approximately 260,000 square feet of total canopy. We sold approximately 56,000119,000 pounds of wholesale product, on a gross basis, respectively, compared to 56,000 and 112,000 pounds sold during each of the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 20262025, and 2025.respectively. Our product portfolio consists of a range of cannabis product categories including flower, pre-rolls, concentrates, vapes, edibles, and other cannabis-related products. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we have 4855 open and operating retail locations, which includes 1017 retail partner locations. We have expansion plans to achieve a target of 60 total retail locations, including retail partner locations. Our new store opening plans are flexible and will ultimately depend on market conditions, local licensing, construction, and other regulatory permissions. Our expansion plans are subject to capital allocation decisions, the evolving regulatory environment, and the general economic environment.

Reworded

Pursuant to various contractual agreements, the Company is providing funding and operational support to third-parties that meet the criteria to be consolidated as variable interest entities (each, a “VIE”). Refer to Note 8, “Variable Interest Entities,” in the Financial Statements for additional information regarding the Company’s VIEs, including the Midwest Retail Partner One, and certain other transactions.VIEs.

Reworded

In April 2025, the Company entered into a definitive agreement pursuant to which the Company proposed to acquire an entity that anticipated obtaining an adult-use license (“Northeast Retail Partnership Dispensary Six”) and receive $1,000 of cash consideration in exchange for the Company’s Ohio cultivation license (the “Ohio Cultivation License”). This transaction was subject to certain closing conditions, including regulatory approvals, and closed in March 2026. Northeast Retail Partnership Dispensary Six was not operational at the time of closing and therefore the Company accounted for this transaction as an asset acquisition and, as further described in Note 4, “Acquisitions,” in the Financial Statements, allocated the cost of $2,700 to the license acquired, in addition to an acquisition-related deferred tax liability of $1,063. The Company recognized a gain on sale of $137, which is included within “General and administrative expenses” on the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations in the Financial Statements for the six months ended June 30, 2026. This gain represented the excess of fair value compared with the $3,529 book value of the Ohio Cultivation License that was de-recognized as of the transaction date.date, less the $1,000 cash received and a nominal value associated with inventory. The parties also settled $349 that the Company previously funded under a note receivable and reimbursed the seller for an additional $588 related to capital expenditures. The Company also assumed the lease for the dispensary location which had a lease liability and ROU asset of $1,066 as of the effective date and is classified as an operating lease. Refer to Note 4, “Acquisitions,” in the Financial Statements for additional information related to this transaction and refer to Note 10, “Leases,” for additional information regarding the Company’s leases.

Added

2026 Acquisitions

Added

Northeast Partnership Dispensaries Seven and Eight

Added

In April 2026, Northeast Retail Partner Seven (as defined in Note 8, “Variable Interest Entities” in the Financial Statements) entered into a definitive agreement to acquire two adult-use dispensaries (“Northeast Partnership Dispensaries Seven and Eight”), which agreement is subject to regulatory approval. The parties also entered into a consulting agreement under which Northeast Retail Partner Seven will provide management and advisory services for a set fee. This consulting agreement became effective in April 2026 and will remain in place until regulatory approval of the definitive agreement is received and the underlying transaction thereby closes. Based on the provisions of this consulting agreement, Northeast Retail Partner Seven obtained operational and financial influence over Northeast Partnership Dispensaries Seven and Eight and therefore recognized the transaction as a business combination as of the April 2026 effective date of the consulting agreement. Total cash consideration for Northeast Partnership Dispensaries Seven and Eight is $3,600, of which $800 was remitted in May 2026 and the remainder is due at final closing, subject to customary closing adjustments, as applicable. Refer to Note 4, “Acquisitions,” in the Financial Statements for additional information related to this transaction and refer to Note 8, “Variable Interest Entities,” for additional information regarding the Company’s VIEs.

Added

Midwest Partnership Two Dispensaries

Added

In May 2026, Midwest Retail Partner Two, as described in Note 8, “Variable Interest Entities,” entered into a definitive agreement to acquire four adult-use dispensaries (the “Midwest Partnership Two Dispensaries”), which agreement is subject to regulatory approval. The parties also entered into a management services agreement (“MSA”) pursuant to which Midwest Retail Partner Two will provide certain management and advisory services for a set fee. This MSA became effective in May 2026, following regulatory approval of the MSA, and will remain in place until the definitive agreement receives regulatory approval and the underlying transaction closes. Based on the provisions of this MSA, Midwest Retail Partner Two obtained operational and financial influence over the Midwest Partnership Two Dispensaries and therefore recognized the transaction as a business combination as of May 2026.

Added

The total consideration for the Midwest Partnership Two Dispensaries was determined to have an estimated fair value of $22,300. Of the total consideration, a deposit of $3,200 was remitted during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and $2,500 was remitted during the three months ended June 30, 2026. The remaining stated cash consideration of $18,800 is due at final closing, subject to certain customary adjustments (the “Midwest Partnership Two Dispensaries Sellers’ Note”). The Midwest Partnership Two Dispensaries Sellers’ Note was initially recorded net of a discount of $2,200 based on an estimated payment date utilizing the Company’s incremental borrowing rate; refer to Note 11, “Debt,” for additional information. Refer to Note 4, “Acquisitions,” in the Financial Statements for additional information related to this transaction and refer to Note 8, “Variable Interest Entities,” for additional information regarding the Company’s VIEs.

Reworded

On April 23, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) issued an order placing cannabis products subject to qualifying state medical cannabis licenses and other cannabis products that are FDA-approved into Schedule III under the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.) (the “CSA”) (the “April 2026 Order”). In addition, the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) hasheld announcedan newadministrative hearingshearing scheduled to begin onfrom June 29, 2026,2026 whichthrough willJuly 15, 2026 to address the proposed broader rescheduling of marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III, including adult-use (recreational) cannabis. The Company is evaluatingWhile the impactin-person of the April 2026 Order on its medical cannabis operations, including its federal and state tax positions, compliance obligations, licensing, access to financial services, and capital markets activities. Due to limited implementation guidance, regulatory interpretation, and the uncertain outcome of additional DEA proceedings, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the financial impact of the April 2026 Order as of the date of filingportion of this Quarterlyhearing Report.concluded on July 15, 2026, participants in the proceeding have until August 17, 2026 to file post-hearing briefs. Once all post-hearing briefs have been received, the DEA Chief Administrative Law Judge overseeing the proceeding will issue his rescheduling recommendation, but the final rescheduling decision ultimately rests with the DEA Administrator.

Reworded

The Company continues to evaluate the impact of the April 2026 Order on its medical cannabis operations, including its federal and state tax positions, compliance obligations, licensing, access to financial services, and capital markets activities. As further discussed within the “Results of Operations” sub-sections of this MD&A and Note 14, “Income Taxes,” in the Financial Statements, the Company’s estimated tax provision for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 includes a benefit related to the revised tax treatment of the Company’s medical-related business. The Company continues to evaluate the limited implementation guidance and regulatory interpretation that is currently available, but the uncertainty of additional information related to such, as well as the potential outcome of additional DEA proceedings, may have a material effect on our future results of operations, cash flows, and liquidity, particularly if it reduces or eliminates the application of Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) Section 280E to some or all of our state-licensed cannabis operations. Any such impact will depend on, among other things, whether the April 2026 Order withstands any legal challenges to its validity, the scope of our qualifying medical cannabis activities, our ability to substantiate deductions attributable to those activities, future guidance that may be issued by various regulatory bodies, including but not limited to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), DOJ, DEA, and various state regulators, and the outcome of pendingthe DEA proceedings regarding the broader rescheduling of marijuana, including adult-use (recreational) cannabis. The Company will continue to evaluate, as more guidance becomes available, whether to file amended tax returns and potential changes to our systems, controls, and cost allocation methodologies that may be required. At this time, we cannot be certain of the future amount of benefit to our income taxes that may be realized, whether the April 2026 Order will improve our access to capital or banking services, or if additional federal regulatory changes will occur.

Reworded

•Revenue decreased by $11,064,$1,186, or 9%,1%, during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, primarily driven by declines across our legacy business resulting from increased competition and pricing pressure in most of our markets, slightlylargely offset by incremental revenue from acquisitions and consolidated partnership activity.

Reworded

•Operating profit was $2,546$5,280 during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to $2,486operating loss of $1,002 during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, primarily attributable to improved margins,margins offsetand bylower highernet general and administrative expenses to support our expanded operations.expenses.

Reworded

•Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $24,756$18,676 during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, primarily resulting from payments associated with acquisitions and capital expenditures, which were offset by net cash usedprovided inby operating activities,activities includingthat was inclusive of an interest payment of $19,125 on our term notes and a $17,000 payment associated with a litigation matter (refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations–Legal Matters–Green Thumb Industries Arbitration Matter” for additional information), partially offset by funding provided by improvements in working capital management..

Reworded

Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 Compared with the Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025

Removed

Revenue

Reworded

Revenue decreased by $11,064 during,$1,186, or 9%,1%, during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. Revenue across legacy dispensary locations declined by $10,210,$7,318, primarily driven by softness in Illinois,Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and PennsylvaniaIllinois that was partially offset by a benefit from adult-use sales in Ohio. Additionally,These thedeclines decrease waswere partially offset by a contribution of $8,985$13,584 of incremental revenue from partner stores and new stores that were added during 2025 and 2026. Net revenue from our wholesale operations declineddecreased by $9,839$7,452 largely resulting from an increased focus on selling products through Company-owned and retail partner locations, as well as ongoing price compression across certain markets, particularly in Illinois,Illinois and New Jersey, and Massachusetts.Jersey. We sold approximately 56,00063,000 pounds of wholesale product, on a gross basis, during eachthe ofthree months ended June 30, 2026, compared to 56,000 during the three months ended MarchJune 31, 2026 and30, 2025.

Reworded

Cost of goods sold, which represents direct and indirect expenses attributable to the production of wholesale products as well as direct expenses incurred in purchasing products from other wholesalers, decreased by $16,385$5,285 during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. Gross profit for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $44,882,$45,491, representing a gross margin of 38.4%,36.1%, compared to gross profit of $39,561$41,392 and gross margin of 30.9%32.5% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. Gross margin for the current quarter benefited from a higher volume of Company-produced products sold through our retail stores and retail partner locations, as well as an increased focus on higher-margin products. These benefits wereproducts, partially offset by an impact from increased competition and pricing pressure across most of our markets. The current period includesalso areflects $2,314 benefit from a rebalancing of overhead expenses at certain cultivation locations from cost of goods sold to general and administrative expenses based on overhead allocations relative to production output at those locations and $1,130$3,576 of lower write-downs of certain inventory items related to net realizable value adjustments, expired products, and obsolete packaging.

Removed

General and administrative expenses increased by $5,261, or 14%, during the three months ended March 31, 2026, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025. The increase was primarily driven by:

Removed

•a $2,066 increase in overhead expenses, including $2,314 of expenses associated with a rebalancing of certain overhead expenses from cost of goods sold, as well as costs associated with the expansion of operations, partially offset by ongoing cost control initiatives;

Removed

•$1,848 of higher compensation expenses in support of the expansion of consolidated operations;

Reworded

•$1,500General and administrative expenses decreased by $2,183, or 5%, during the three months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease was primarily attributable to a net benefit of $4,181 of acquisition-related earn-out fair value adjustments that was offset by $1,285 of higher depreciation and amortization associated with a larger average balance of fixed assets in service, including finance leases, and the incremental amortization of licenses from prior year acquisitions;acquisitions, and $1,018 of higher compensation expenses in support of the expansion of consolidated operations.

Added

Interest Expense

Added

Interest expense increased by $8,743, or 73%, during the three months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025. The current year was impacted primarily by $8,386 of higher interest associated with finance leases; refer to Note 10, “Leases,” in the Financial Statements for additional information. During the three months ended June 30, 2026, the Company had a weighted-average outstanding debt balance, excluding finance leases, of $323,201 with a weighted-average interest rate of 12.3%, compared to a weighted-average debt balance of $346,661 during the three months ended June 30, 2025 with a weighted-average interest rate of 11.6%.

Added

Income Tax Expense

Added

Under the limitations of IRC Section 280E, which applies to Schedule I and Schedule II controlled substances, cannabis companies are only allowed to deduct expenses directly related to the sales of product (cost of goods sold). This results in permanent differences between ordinary and necessary business expenses deemed non-allowable under IRC Section 280E and those allowed for financial statement reporting purposes (“book-to-tax” differences). Cannabis companies operating in states that align their tax codes with IRC Section 280E are also unable to deduct ordinary and necessary business expenses for state tax purposes. Ordinary and necessary business expenses deemed non-deductible under IRC Section 280E are treated as permanent book-to-tax differences. Therefore, the effective tax rate on income realized by cannabis companies can be highly variable and may not necessarily correlate with pre-tax income or loss.

Added

As discussed further above within “Recent Developments – Operational and Regulation Overview,” following the April 2026 Order, certain cannabis products subject to qualifying state medical cannabis licenses and other cannabis products that are FDA-approved were rescheduled from Schedule I to Schedule III under the CSA. Because IRC Section 280E applies to Schedule I and Schedule II controlled substances, this rescheduling removes IRC Section 280E expense disallowances for qualifying medical cannabis activities. The Department of the Treasury and the IRS announced that forthcoming transition guidance will apply this relief to the full 2026 taxable year for qualifying medical cannabis activities. For businesses that operate both medical and adult-use cannabis under state licenses, the IRS has indicated that the guidance will include clarification on activity-based allocation and apportionment. The specific details and timing of such guidance remain unclear. Accordingly, the extent to which the Company may ultimately benefit from relief under IRC Section 280E is uncertain. As of June 30, 2026, the Company recognized relief from IRC Section 280E for its qualifying medical cannabis activities. Adult-use (recreational) cannabis operations remain classified under Schedule I, and, accordingly, IRC Section 280E remains applicable with regard to disallowance rules related to adult-use operations and apportioned shared expenses, pending further regulatory developments. State conformity to federal rescheduling varies, and the Company will evaluate state tax impacts as regulations and state guidance evolve.

Added

The Company’s quarterly tax provision is calculated under the discrete method which treats the interim period as if it were the annual period and determines the income tax expense or benefit on that basis. The discrete method is applied when application of the estimated annual effective tax rate is impractical because it is not possible to reliably estimate the annual effective tax rate. The Company believes, at this time, the use of this discrete method is more appropriate than the annual effective tax rate method due to the high degree of uncertainty in estimating annual pre-tax income.

Added

As of June 30, 2026, the Company recorded an uncertain tax liability totaling $214,487 for uncertain tax positions related to the treatment of certain transactions and deductions under IRC Section 280E based on legal interpretations that challenge the Company’s tax liability under IRC Section 280E. A total of $14,818 was released from the Company’s reserve during the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 with regard to specific matters for tax positions that were settled with taxing authorities, which favorably impacted the Company’s effective tax rates for the current year periods. The Company is evaluating the impact of the April 2026 Order on its existing uncertain tax positions recorded under IRC Section 280E, but, given the limited implementation guidance issued to date, the Company has not adjusted prior year positions as of the date these Financial Statements were issued. The Company has been selected for examination of its amended tax returns filed with its unrecognized tax benefits but does not currently anticipate these to be resolved in the next twelve months and anticipates that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits may change within the next twelve months for additional uncertain tax positions taken on a go-forward basis. If favorably resolved, the unrecognized tax benefits would decrease the Company’s effective tax rate. Refer to Note 14, “Income Taxes,” in the Financial Statements for additional information regarding the Company’s income taxes.

Added

The Company’s income tax benefit was $5,721, or (12.6)%, of gross profit, during the three months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to an income tax expense of $11,831, or 28.6%, of gross profit, during the three months ended June 30, 2025. The effective tax rate on gross profit for the three months ended June 30, 2026 reflects a net benefit of $14,818 related to a release from the reserve for uncertain tax positions and a benefit related to the deductibility of certain expenses associated with medical cannabis activities as permitted in the current year following updates from the April 2026 Order. These benefits were partially offset by a $1,085 increase in the Company’s valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets. Refer to Note 14, “Income Taxes,” in the Financial Statements for additional information regarding the Company’s income taxes.

Added

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Added

Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared with the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025

Added

Revenue decreased by $12,250, or 5%, during the six months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. Revenue across legacy dispensary locations declined by $17,528, primarily driven by softness in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Illinois that was partially offset by a benefit from adult-use sales in Ohio. These declines were partially offset by a contribution of $22,569 of incremental revenue from partner stores and from new stores that were added during 2025 and 2026. Net revenue from our wholesale operations declined by $17,291 largely resulting from an increased focus on selling products through Company-owned and retail partner locations, as well as ongoing price compression across certain markets, particularly in Illinois and New Jersey. We sold approximately 119,000 pounds of wholesale product, on a gross basis, during the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to 112,000 pounds during the six months ended June 30, 2025.

Added

Cost of Goods Sold and Gross Profit

Added

Cost of goods sold decreased by $21,670, or 12%, during the six months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. Gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was $90,373, representing a gross margin of 37.2%, compared to gross profit of $80,953 and gross margin of 31.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2025. Gross margin in the current year benefitted from a higher volume of Company-produced products sold through our retail stores and retail partner locations, as well as an increased focus on higher-margin products. These benefits were partially offset by an impact from increased competition and pricing pressure across most of our markets. The current period includes a $4,840 benefit from a rebalancing of overhead expenses at certain cultivation locations from cost of goods sold to general and administrative expenses based on overhead allocations relative to production output at those locations, which was reflected beginning in the second quarter of 2025, compared to $3,113 in the prior year period. Additionally, the current period reflects $4,706 of lower write-downs of certain inventory items related to net realizable value adjustments, expired products, and obsolete packaging.

Added

General and Administrative Expenses

Added

General and administrative expenses increased by $3,078, or 4%, during the six months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was primarily driven by:

Added

•a $2,785 increase in depreciation and amortization expense, which was attributable to a larger average balance of fixed assets in service;

Added

•a $2,866 increase in total compensation expense in support of the expansion of consolidated operations, net of $211 of lower equity-based compensation expense;

Added

•a $1,741 increase in overhead expenses, which is largely attributable to $1,727 of higher expenses associated with a rebalancing of certain overhead expenses from cost of goods sold; and

Reworded

These increases were partially offset by a net benefit of $432$4,953 of acquisition-related earn-out fair value adjustments and a $340 reversal of expense associated with an acquisition earn-out that was not achieved.adjustments.

Reworded

Interest expense increased by $9,063,$17,806, or 81%,77%, during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.2025, The current year wasprimarily impacted primarilyby by$17,013 of higher interest associated with finance leases; refer to Note 10, “Leases,” in the Financial Statements for additional information. During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company had a weighted-average outstanding debt balance, excluding finance leases, of $319,335$321,055 with a weighted-average interest rate of 12.3%, compared to a weighted-average debt balance of $346,089$345,027 during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 with a weighted-average interest rate of 11.5%.11.6%.

Removed

The Company’s quarterly tax provision is calculated under the discrete method which treats the interim period as if it were the annual period and determines the income tax expense or benefit on that basis. The discrete method is applied when application of the estimated annual effective tax rate is impractical because it is not possible to reliably estimate the annual effective tax rate. The Company believes, at this time, the use of this discrete method is more appropriate than the annual effective tax rate method due to the high degree of uncertainty in estimating annual pre-tax income due to the early growth stage of the business.

Removed

The IRS has taken the position that cannabis companies are subject to the limitations of IRC Section 280E, under which such companies are only allowed to deduct expenses directly related to the sales of product. This results in permanent differences between ordinary and necessary business expenses deemed non-allowable under IRC Section 280E and those allowed for financial statement reporting purposes (“book-to-tax” differences). Cannabis companies operating in states that align their tax codes with IRC Section 280E are also unable to deduct ordinary and necessary business expenses for state tax purposes. Ordinary and necessary business expenses deemed non-deductible under IRC Section 280E are treated as permanent book-to-tax differences. Therefore, the effective tax rate on income realized by cannabis companies can be highly variable and may not necessarily correlate with pre-tax income or loss.

Removed

As of March 31, 2026, the Company recorded an uncertain tax liability totaling $218,673 for uncertain tax positions related to the treatment of certain transactions and deductions under IRC Section 280E based on legal interpretations that challenge the Company’s tax liability under IRC Section 280E. The Company is evaluating the impact of the April 2026 Order on its existing uncertain tax positions recorded under IRC Section 280E (see Note 14, “Income Taxes,” in the Financial Statements), but, given the uncertainties described above, has not adjusted such positions as of the date this Quarterly Report was issued. The Company has been selected for examination of its amended tax returns filed with these unrecognized tax benefits but does not currently anticipate its unrecognized tax benefits to be resolved in the next twelve months and anticipates that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits may change within the next twelve months for additional uncertain tax positions taken on a go-forward basis. If favorably resolved, the unrecognized tax benefits would decrease the Company’s effective tax rate.

Reworded

The Company’s incomeIncome tax expense was $11,907,$6,186, or 26.5%,6.8%, of gross profit, during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to an income tax expense of $11,031,$22,862, or 27.9%,28.2%, of gross profit, during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The effective tax rate on gross profit for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 reflects a net benefit of $14,818 related to a release from the reserve for uncertain tax positions, a benefit related to the deductibility of certain expenses associated with medical cannabis activities as permitted in the current year following updates from the April 2026 Order, and a benefit from the tax treatment of a settlement paymentpayment. andThese certainbenefits acquired intangible assets,were partially offset by a $1,095$2,180 increase in the Company’s valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets. Refer to Note 14, “Income Taxes,” in the Financial Statements for additional information regarding the Company’s income taxes.

Reworded

The following table presents Adjusted Gross Profit for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025:

Reworded

The following table presents Adjusted EBITDA for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025:

Reworded

(2)One-time costs associated with acquiring real estate, obtaining licenses and permits, and other costs incurred before commencement of operations at certain locations, as well as incremental expenses associated with the expansion of activities at our cultivation facilities that are not yet operating at scale, other expenses resulting from delays in regulatory approvals, and other related one-time or non-recurring expenses, as applicable. The three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 also includes $2,314$2,526 and $4,840, respectively, of unallocated overhead expenses at certain cultivation facilities resulting from a rebalancing of overhead expenses from cost of goods sold to general and administrative expenses based on overhead allocations relative to production output at those locations.locations, compared with $3,113 during each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2025.

Reworded

(3)Other non-recurring expenses including legal and professional fees associated with litigation matters, potential acquisitions, other regulatory matters, and other reserves or one-time expenses, including certain non-recurring professional fees and severance expenses associated with certain strategic initiatives. The three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 includes a net reduction ofrelated approximately $432 ofto acquisition-related earn-out fair value adjustments, a $340 reversaladjustments of anapproximately acquisition earn-out that was not achieved,$4,181 and $244$4,953, ofrespectively, and $33 and $277, respectively, related to property development expense write-offs. The three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 include approximately $700 of expenses associated with our May 2025 term loans and the six months ended June 30, 2025 includes approximately $400 of expenses associated with our January 2025 term loans. The three and six months ended June 30, 2025 also each include approximately $100 of fair value adjustments associated with acquisition earn-outs.

Reworded

As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, we had total current liabilities of $88,458$112,643 and $109,009, respectively, and total current assets of $188,964$186,867 and $208,949, respectively, which includes cash and cash equivalents of $60,920$67,000 and $85,676, respectively, to meet our current obligations. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had working capital of $100,506,$74,224, compared to $99,940 as of December 31, 2025.

Reworded

Approximately 91% and 94% of our cash and cash equivalents balance as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively, is on deposit with banks, credit unions, or other financial institutions. We have not experienced any material impacts related to banking restrictions applicable to cannabis businesses. Our cash and cash equivalents balance is not restricted for use by VIEs.

Reworded

As reflected in the Financial Statements, we have had recurring losses that have resulted in an accumulated deficit as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had cash and cash equivalents of $60,920,$67,000, which, combined with anticipated cash flows from operating activities, management believes is more than adequate to support operations for the next twelve months from the date of issuance of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Over the longer term, management expects to fund our operations and strategic initiatives with cash flows from operating activities and existing financing arrangements, and we currently do not have significant debt maturities until 2029. Management may continue to access capital markets for additional funding through debt and/or equity financings to supplement future cash needs, as may be required. However, management cannot provide any assurances that the Company will be successful in accomplishing its business plans. If we are unable to raise additional capital on favorable terms, if at all, whenever necessary, we may be forced to decelerate or curtail certain of our operations until such time as additional capital becomes available.

Reworded

As amended, the July 2024 Loan Agreement requires the Company, on a consolidated basis, to maintain liquidity, consisting of cash and/or cash equivalents plus any future revolving credit availability, as of the last day of each fiscal month, as amended, in an aggregate amount of at least $20,000, with which the Company was in compliance as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026. The Company is required to comply with certain other financial covenants in contemplation of certain transactions or events, such as acquisitions and other financing activities, as defined within and provided for under the July 2024 Loan Agreement, as amended.

Reworded

On September 29, 2025, certain of the Company’s subsidiaries (the “Borrowing Subsidiaries”) entered into a loan agreement and related promissory note with an aggregate principal amount of $9,345 (the “Mortgage Note”), which was borrowed in full. The Company anticipates utilizing the net proceeds for general corporate purposes, including to fund growth initiatives. The Mortgage Note matures on September 29, 2030 and borrowings thereunder bear interest at a rate of 8.5% per annum. Principal will be repaid based on an amortization period of twenty years and any unpaid principal and accrued interest will be due and payable upon maturity. Monthly payments of principal and interest commenced on November 1, 2025. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, $191$195 and $187, respectively, of principal is included within “Current portion of debt, net” and $9,082$9,033 and $9,133, respectively, is included within “Long-term debt, net” on the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets in the Financial Statements. The obligations under the Mortgage Note are secured by mortgages on three properties that the Company owns in Ohio, as well as assignment of any leases and rent amounts related to these properties that the Company may enter into. The Mortgage Note contains customary representations and events of default. The Borrowing Subsidiaries have agreed to comply with certain customary covenants, including, but not limited to, restrictions on their ability to: incur additional indebtedness; create certain liens; make material changes to the nature of the business conducted; and sell, lease, transfer, or otherwise dispose of all or a substantial part of their assets. The Mortgage Note also requires the Borrowing Subsidiaries to maintain a debt service coverage ratio (as defined in the Mortgage Note) of not less than 1.30 to 1.00 measured annually based on the entire calendar year and commencing on December 31, 2026.

Reworded

Net cash usedprovided inby operating activities was $19,411$3,040 during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to $5,939 of net cash provided$23,740 during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The current year reflects $19,323$19,524 of cash interest paid on debt arrangements, compared with $16,400$17,307 paid for interest in the prior year, and a $17,000 settlement payment associated with a previous litigation matter, which were offset by a net improvement from working capital management.

Reworded

Net cash used in investing activities was $4,753$17,841 during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to $7,847$16,436 during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The current year includesreflects higher payments associated with acquisitions as compared to the prior year, offset by proceeds received from the settlement of a previous loan receivable and the sale of certain assets,assets and reflects lower capital expenditures, which were offset by higher payments associated with acquisitions as compared to the prior year.expenditures.

Showing the first 60 of 82 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

AAWH insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

No Form 4 stock transactions in this period.

Well-known investors holding AAWH (13F)

None of the 59 investors we track reported a position in their latest 13F.

Coming soon: email alerts when AAWH files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.