Companies › ABR

ABR 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

Arbor Realty Trust Inc. (also ABR-PD, ABR-PE, ABR-PF) · NYSE · Real Estate Investment Trusts · CIK 1253986 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from Arbor Realty Trust Inc.'s public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

23 / 15risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
5new risk-factor headings
8Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
3Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-02-27 (period ending 2025-12-31) with 10-K filed 2025-02-21 (period ending 2024-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

23new paragraphs
15removed paragraphs
37reworded paragraphs
17,236 → 18,673words in section

New heading “Our increasing use of loan modifications for borrowers experiencing financial difficulty could adversely affect our operating results, financial condition, liquidity and our ability to achieve expected recoveries.”

New heading “We are increasingly exposed to risks associated with owning and operating real estate acquired through foreclosure, which could subject us to losses and liabilities in excess of those associated with our loans.”

New heading “Our growing single‑family rental BTR and construction lending activities expose us to higher credit, development and concentration risks that could increase losses and volatility of earnings.”

New heading “We are subject to risks of fraud, misrepresentation and other misconduct by borrowers, brokers, guarantors and other third parties, which could result in credit losses and litigation and may not be fully covered by contractual remedies or insurance.”

New heading “If our Agency Business fails to comply with GSE and HUD program requirements, guidelines or oversight or is adversely affected by changes in applicable regulations or program standards, our costs could increase and our ability to conduct the Agency Business could be restricted, which could materially and adversely affect our results.”

Removed heading “We may not be able to find suitable replacement investments during CLO reinvestment periods.”

Removed heading “Our investments financed in foreign locations may involve significant risks.”

Removed heading “If our Agency Business fails to comply with the regulations and program requirements of the GSEs and HUD, we may lose our approved lender status with these entities and fail to gain additional approvals or licenses for our business. We are also subject to changes in laws, regulations and existing GSE and HUD program requirements, including potential increases in reserve and risk retention requirements that could increase our costs and affect the way we conduct the Agency Business, which could materially and adversely affect our financial results.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: default, investigation, litigation, restructuring
“If fraud or other misconduct occurs, we may experience delays in detecting problems, increased delinquencies, defaults, restructurings and foreclosures, reduced recoveries on collateral and higher costs to service or resolve affected loans. We may also incur expenses and management time associated with investigations, workout activities and litigation or other proceedings, and we could suffer reputational harm. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: bankruptcy, default, litigation, restructuring

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Our business is subject to risk of loss in connection with defaults on loans, failed loan deliveries to GSEs and potential requirements to repurchase loans already sold to GSEs or other issuers of securitizations for a breach of representations or warranties. We are subject to risks of fraud, misrepresentation and other misconduct by borrowers, brokers, guarantors and other third parties, which could increase delinquencies, defaults, restructurings and foreclosures, reduce recoveries on collateral and result in increased costs, repurchase or indemnification obligations, litigation and reputational harm. Certain investments we make, including preferred equity and mezzanine loans, involve a greater risk of loss than traditional mortgage financing and may result in reduced recoveries in the event of borrower distress, bankruptcy or other defaults. If we fail to act proactively with delinquent borrowers in an effort to avoid defaults, the number of delinquent loans could increase, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
see in full comparison
New text topics: investigation, litigation, cybersecurity incident, breach
“We have not experienced any material misappropriation, loss or unauthorized disclosure of confidential or personally identifiable information as a result of a cybersecurity breach or other act, however, a cybersecurity breach or other act and/or disruption to our information technology systems or to the information technology systems of our third-party providers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: default, liquidity, inflation, interest rate
“The commercial real estate markets have experienced a prolonged dislocation driven by inflation and high interest rates, which has persisted longer than anticipated. The elevated and unpredictable interest rate environment has resulted in, and may continue to result in, decreased real estate values, increased delinquencies and defaults, and a disruption in the capital markets. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: default, liquidity, inflation, interest rate

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

The commercial real estate markets have experienced a prolonged dislocation due to inflation and high interest rates, which has resulted in decreased real estate values, increased delinquencies and defaults, and a disruption in the capital markets. This environment has had a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. If this environment persists, it is likely we will continue to experience an adverse impact on our business. The risks associated with these types of markets, andalong with other risks related to our business, are described below. The risk factors listed belowpresented should not be considered an all-inclusive list. New risk factorsrisks emerge periodically, and we cannot guarantee that the factors described below list all risks that may become material to us at any later time. Some ofin the future. Certain risk factors discussed below may havealso different impacts onaffect our Structured and Agency Businesses.Businesses differently. Additionally, you should review “Current Market Conditions, Risks and Recent Trends” located in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for afurther discussiondiscussions of the current adverse market conditions that we are currently experiencing, and may continue to experience in the future, that are having an adverse impact on our business.
see in full comparison
New text topics: sanction, liquidity, regulation
“Our Agency Business is subject to the requirements, guidelines and oversight of the GSEs and HUD. These requirements include, among other things, minimum net worth, operational liquidity and collateral standards and quality control, reporting and recordkeeping obligations, and our compliance is subject to review and inspection by the GSEs, HUD and other regulatory authorities. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (75)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 3 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Added

The commercial real estate markets have experienced a prolonged dislocation driven by inflation and high interest rates, which has persisted longer than anticipated. The elevated and unpredictable interest rate environment has resulted in, and may continue to result in, decreased real estate values, increased delinquencies and defaults, and a disruption in the capital markets. This environment has had a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity through increases in nonperforming loans, loan modifications, credit loss reserves and foreclosures. If this environment persists, we are likely to continue experiencing adverse effects on our business.

Reworded

The commercial real estate markets have experienced a prolonged dislocation due to inflation and high interest rates, which has resulted in decreased real estate values, increased delinquencies and defaults, and a disruption in the capital markets. This environment has had a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. If this environment persists, it is likely we will continue to experience an adverse impact on our business. The risks associated with these types of markets, andalong with other risks related to our business, are described below. The risk factors listed belowpresented should not be considered an all-inclusive list. New risk factorsrisks emerge periodically, and we cannot guarantee that the factors described below list all risks that may become material to us at any later time. Some ofin the future. Certain risk factors discussed below may havealso different impacts onaffect our Structured and Agency Businesses.Businesses differently. Additionally, you should review “Current Market Conditions, Risks and Recent Trends” located in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for afurther discussiondiscussions of the current adverse market conditions that we are currently experiencing, and may continue to experience in the future, that are having an adverse impact on our business.

Reworded

Risks Related to Our Business. An economic slowdown, a lengthy or severe recession, declining real estate values, or changes in short and/or long termlong-term interest rates could harm our operations, affect our ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms and have other adverse effects on us. If economic conditions deterioratedeteriorate, interest rates remain elevated and/or we experience a turbulent economic environment, we will likely: (1) experience increases in loan loss reserves and other impairments; (2) encounter difficulty estimating loan loss reserves; and (3) experience an increaseincreases in loan delinquenciesdelinquencies, loan modifications and loannonperforming modifications.loans Ifand weforeclosures; are(4) unableexperience increased costs and risks associated with operating, managing and disposing of real estate owned (“REO”) assets; and (5) experience evolving climate-related, environmental and cybersecurity risks affecting us, our borrowers, collateral properties and key third-party service providers. In addition, such conditions may continue to investnegatively excessaffect capitalour liquidity, operating results and credit performance and may negatively impact expected recoveries on acceptablemodified terms, or at all, it would likely result in a declining portfolioloans, and wouldmodified adverselyloans affectmay thecontinue returnsto fromunderperform, ourpotentially investmentsincreasing nonperforming assets, REO, and ourcredit operatingloss results.provisions.

Added

Our growing SFR and construction/build‑to‑rent (“BTR”) lending exposes us to higher credit, development and concentration risks than stabilized multifamily loans. Cost overruns, delays, permitting and contractor issues, and weaker lease-up or operating performance could increase delinquencies, defaults, modifications and foreclosures.

Added

If we are unable to invest excess capital on acceptable terms, or at all, it would likely result in a declining portfolio and would adversely affect the returns from our investments and our operating results. Our ability to accurately estimate current expected credit loss ("CECL") allowances is increasingly complex due to market volatility, commercial real estate prices and the impact of interest rates, and our actual credit losses may differ materially from estimates.

Reworded

Our business is subject to risk of loss in connection with defaults on loans, failed loan deliveries to GSEs and potential requirements to repurchase loans already sold to GSEs or other issuers of securitizations for a breach of representations or warranties. We are subject to risks of fraud, misrepresentation and other misconduct by borrowers, brokers, guarantors and other third parties, which could increase delinquencies, defaults, restructurings and foreclosures, reduce recoveries on collateral and result in increased costs, repurchase or indemnification obligations, litigation and reputational harm. Certain investments we make, including preferred equity and mezzanine loans, involve a greater risk of loss than traditional mortgage financing and may result in reduced recoveries in the event of borrower distress, bankruptcy or other defaults. If we fail to act proactively with delinquent borrowers in an effort to avoid defaults, the number of delinquent loans could increase, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Reworded

A significant portion of our Agency Business’s revenue is derived from loan servicing fees. Any declines in the value of our servicing portfolio, including agreement terminations from breaches of servicing agreements, or a reduction in the fees paid for servicing the loans could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and liquidity. Increased loss-sharing obligations under the Fannie Mae DUS program, or changes to required collateral levels, could further adversely affect our liquidity and results of operations.

Reworded

For most loans we service under the Fannie Mae and HUD programs, we are required to advance payments due to investors if the borrower is delinquent in making such payments, which requirement couldmay adversely impact our liquidity and harm our results of operations.

Reworded

Risks Related to Our Financing and Hedging Activities. We finance a significant amount of our loans and investments through a variety of means, including CLOs, securitizations, credit facilities, equity capital, senior and convertible debt instruments, and other structured financings.financings, some of which we guarantee. These vehicles may contain restrictive covenants and may require us to provide additional collateral or repurchase assets if the value of pledged assets, some of which we guarantee,assets decline in value. If we are unable to acquire eligible investments, find suitable replacement investments and access financing sources on favorable terms, or at all, we may not be able to obtain the level of leverage necessary to optimize our return on investment and cash available for distribution to our stockholders may decline.

Reworded

Cybersecurity Risks. If we are unable to safeguard against cybersecurity breaches and cyberattacks with respect to our information systems, our business may be adversely affected. With cyber threats increasing in frequency and severity, potential breaches pose a significant threat to our operations, potentially leading to reputational damage, financial losses, and legal repercussions. Our ability to monitor and influence the cybersecurity practices of third-party providers is limited, and while we seek to influence their practices through cybersecurity requirements and protocols in our contracts with such third-party providers, their security measures may not be sufficient to prevent or mitigate incidents, increasing operational risk. Newly adopted regulatory disclosure requirements may subject us to additional liability in the event of a cybersecurity incident.

Reworded

Risks Related to Our Status as a REIT. We conduct a substantial portion of our operations to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. If we fail to remain qualified as a REIT, wea greater proportion of our income will be subject to corporate tax and we could face a substantial increase in our tax liability, including taxable mortgage pools resulting from certain of our securitizations. Even if we remain qualified as a REIT, we may face other tax liabilities, including taxes on any undistributed income, tax on income from some activities conducted as a result of a foreclosure, and state or local income, property and transfer taxes, all of which could reduce our cash flow and our distributions to stockholders. Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forego or liquidate otherwise attractive opportunities and investments.

Reworded

We may be unable to generate sufficient revenuecash flow from operations to pay our operating expenses and to pay dividends to our stockholders, resulting in the need to borrow funds to satisfy our REIT distribution requirements, which could cause a portion of our distributions to be treated as a return of capital.

Reworded

General Risks. We are subject to certain general risks, all of which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, such as: (1) volatility in our stock price; (2) major public health crisis; (3) global economic and political conditions; (4) major bank failures; (5) losses of key personnel with long standing business relationships; (6) adverse resolutions of lawsuits; (7) terrorist attacks; (8) military conflict; (9) changes to laws and regulations, including environmental, social and governance matters; and (10) the effectiveimpact of the continuing development of artificial intelligence ("AI").

Reworded

ProlongedA disruptionsprolonged disruption in the financial markets could affect our ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms and have other adverse effects on us and the market price of our common stock.

Reworded

Commercial real estate can be adversely affected by a lack of liquidity caused by a prolonged economic downturn, which may limit our ability to raise equity or debt in the capital markets or obtain financing on favorable terms, if at all. If we do issue equity, it may be dilutive to our existing stockholders or could result in the issuance of securities that have rights, preferences and privileges that are senior to those of our existing securities. If economic or market conditions deteriorate, lending institutions may choose to exit markets such as repurchase lending, become insolvent, further tighten their lending standards or increase the amount of equity capital required to obtain financing, and such events could make it more difficult for us to obtain financing on favorable terms or at all, in which event our profitability will be adversely affected. These factors may also make it more difficult for our borrowers to repay our loans as they may experience difficulties in selling assets, obtaining other financing or realize increased costs of financing. Disruptions in the financial markets also may have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

Reworded

We estimate allowances for credit losses on our loans and investments under the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) methodology based on current expected credit losses for the life of the loan and investment. This process utilizes information obtained from internal and external sources relating to past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts about the future and requires certain estimates and judgments, which are more difficult to make during a period in which available commercial real estate credit is limited and commercial real estate transactions have decreased. Our estimates and judgments are based on several factors, including projected cash flows from the collateral securing our loans, debt structure, including the availability of reserves and recourse guarantees, likelihood of repayment in full at loan maturity, potential for refinancing by other lenders and expected market discount rates for varying property types. Our CECL methodology may not fully capture the severity or duration of adverse economic conditions and actual losses could exceed our allowance, particularly if commercial real estate values decline further, interest rates remain elevated, or our borrowers’ business plans fail to stabilize underlying properties. If our estimates and judgments are not correct, our results of operations and financial condition could be severely impacted.

Reworded

Our financial performance is significantly influenced by movements in both short termshort-term and long termlong-term interest rates. Since the vast majority of our structured loan portfolio is floating rate based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") and a greatersignificant portion of our debt balances consist of fixed-rate instruments (such as convertible and senior unsecured notes), a rising interest rate environment generally has a positive impact on our net interest income from our structured loan portfolio. Furthermore, our earnings on escrows and cash balances also benefit from an elevated short termshort-term rate environment. However, a prolonged period of elevated short and long termlong-term interest rates may result in: (1) increased payment delinquencies and defaults; (2) increased loan modifications and foreclosures; (3) an increase in real estate owned ("REO") assets; (4) declining real estate values of certain asset classes; and (5) a dislocation in capital markets, all of which would adversely impact our results of operations, financial condition, business prospects and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. Conversely, a high long termlong-term interest rate environment would likely have an adverse impact on our fixed rate GSE/Agency business, as it will likely increase delinquencies and make it more costly for borrowers to refinance their balance sheet loans with fixed rate agency product.

Added

Our increasing use of loan modifications for borrowers experiencing financial difficulty could adversely affect our operating results, financial condition, liquidity and our ability to achieve expected recoveries.

Added

In recent periods, we have increasingly addressed borrower stress through loan modifications, including payment deferrals, term extensions, interest‑rate reductions and other concessions. While these modifications may improve our ultimate recovery and avoid immediate foreclosure, they can also reduce our current interest income, delay the timing of expected repayments and increase the complexity of estimating credit losses. There is no assurance that our borrowers will perform under modified loans or that we will achieve the recoveries we anticipate. If economic and market conditions worsen, the performance of modified loans could deteriorate further, which would likely increase our level of non‑performing loans, REO and credit‑loss provisions and could adversely affect our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

Added

We are increasingly exposed to risks associated with owning and operating real estate acquired through foreclosure, which could subject us to losses and liabilities in excess of those associated with our loans.

Added

When a loan defaults, we may seek to protect our investment by foreclosing and operating it as REO until it can be sold or otherwise resolved. In recent periods, we have acquired a growing number of properties as REO, and our REO balance has increased. Owning and operating REO subjects us to many of the risks associated with direct real estate ownership, including, among others, risks related to leasing, property management, insurance, real estate taxes, utilities and other operating costs, capital expenditures, environmental liabilities, zoning and other regulatory compliance, casualty events and litigation.

Added

We may not be able to sell REO assets at prices or within time frames that are attractive to us, particularly in markets or property types that are experiencing declining values or weak demand. In addition, REO properties may require significant additional investment to stabilize operations or comply with regulatory requirements, which may not be fully recoverable. While we may obtain mortgage financing secured by REO properties, we may also choose or be required to fund operating deficits, capital expenditures or debt service shortfalls from our own capital. Any failure to effectively manage, finance and dispose of REO assets could result in losses that are greater than those we would have incurred had we not foreclosed.

Added

Our growing single‑family rental BTR and construction lending activities expose us to higher credit, development and concentration risks that could increase losses and volatility of earnings.

Added

A growing portion of our Structured Business consists of loans secured by SFR and construction or BTR properties. These loans generally involve greater risk than loans on stabilized multifamily properties because repayment often depends on successful completion, lease‑up and ongoing performance of the underlying projects, as well as the financial strength and execution capability of the sponsors. Construction and BTR loans are particularly sensitive to cost overruns, delays, entitlement and permitting risks, contractor performance, and changes in labor, materials and insurance costs. If interest reserves or borrower equity are insufficient to absorb these pressures, or if rent growth or occupancy is weaker than expected, borrowers may be unable to service or refinance their loans, leading to increased delinquencies, defaults, loan modifications, extensions and foreclosures.

Added

In addition, our SFR and construction lending may result in greater geographic or sponsor concentration and may be disproportionately affected by local economic conditions, housing supply‑demand imbalances, regulatory and zoning changes, and shifts in homeownership or rental demand. Deterioration in the performance or valuations of these assets, or in the ability to finance or securitize them on acceptable terms, could require us to increase our allowances for credit losses, recognize charge‑offs, or take title to additional SFR or development assets as REO, which may require active property‑level management and additional capital expenditures. Any of these events could increase the volatility of our results of operations and liquidity and could adversely affect our business, financial condition and ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Removed

In our Structured Business, we may invest in preferred equity investments, which involve a higher degree of risk than traditional mortgage financing. Such investments are usually subordinate to other loans and are not secured by the property underlying the investment. Should the issuer default on our investment, we can only proceed against the entity in which we have an interest, and not the underlying property. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our investment.

Added

In our Structured Business, we invest in preferred equity investments, which involve a higher degree of risk than traditional mortgage financing. Such investments are usually subordinate to other loans and are not secured by the property underlying the investment. Should the issuer default on our investment, we can only proceed against the entity in which we have an interest, and not the underlying property. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our investment.

Reworded

Multifamily and commercial property values and net operating income derived from such properties are subject to volatility and may be affected adversely by a number of factors, including fires and other casualties, natural disasters, acts of war and/or terrorism, adverse economic conditions, adoption of, or changes in, rent control or rent stabilization laws, local real estate conditions (such as an oversupply of similar properties), changes or continued weakness in specific industry segments, construction quality, construction cost, age and design, demographic factors, retroactive changes to building or similar codes, increases in operating expenses (such as insurance, energy costs and real estate tax increases) and other factors that may cause unanticipated and uninsured performance declines and/or losses to us or the owners and operators of the real estate securing our investment. In the event a property’s net operating income decreases, a borrower may have difficulty repaying our loan, which could result in losses to us. In addition, decreases in property values reduce the value of the collateral and the potential proceeds available to a borrower to repay our loans, which could negatively impact our operating results.

Reworded

Our ability to manage our structured portfolio of loans and investments may be limited by the form in which they are made. For example, our investments may be subject to rights of senior lenders and servicers under inter-creditor or servicing agreements whose interests may not be aligned with ours. We may co-invest with third parties through participation agreements, partnerships, joint ventures or other entities, and we may have limited control rights. We may rely on independent third partythird-party management or strategic partners with respect to the management of an asset. In such event, we may not be able to exercise sufficient control over the loan or investment and the risks associated therewith. Further, a third partythird-party partner may have financial difficulties that impact our asset or may have economic or business objectives which are inconsistent with ours. In addition, we may, in certain circumstances, be liable for the actions of our third partythird-party partners.

Reworded

Under the Fannie Mae DUS program, our Agency Business originates and services multifamily loans for Fannie Mae without needing Fannie Mae’s prior approval, as long as the loans meet the underwriting guidelines set forth by Fannie Mae. In return for such delegated authority and the commitment to purchase loans by Fannie Mae, we are required to share risk of loss on loans sold through Fannie Mae and we must provide collateral to Fannie Mae to secure any potential losses. Under the full risk-sharing formula, we absorb the first 5% of any losses on the UPB of a loan at the time of loss settlement, and above 5% we share the loss with Fannie Mae, with our maximum loss capped at 20% of the original UPB of a loan. Our Agency Business has modified its risk-sharing obligations on some Fannie Mae DUS loans to reduce potential loss exposure on those loans.loans, which, in turn, results in a lower servicing fee. In addition, Fannie Mae can increase our risk-sharing obligations or require us to repurchase loans if the loan does not meet specific underwriting criteria or if the loan defaults within 12 months of its sale to Fannie Mae. At December 31, 2024,2025, the Agency Business had pledged $91.5$100.9 million in restricted liquidity as collateral against future losses under $22.73$24.09 billion of loans outstanding that are subject to risk-sharing obligations. Fannie Mae collateral requirements may change in the future. At December 31, 2024,2025, the Agency Business’s allowance for loss-sharing balance was $83.2$97.6 million, which may not be sufficient to cover future loss sharing obligations. While our Agency Business originates loans that meet the underwriting guidelines defined by Fannie Mae, in addition to our own internal underwriting guidelines, underwriting criteria may not always protect against loan defaults. Other factors can lead to a default on a loan, such as a decline in property value, cash flow, occupancy, maintenance needs and other financing obligations. If loan defaults increase, our risk-sharing obligation payments under the Fannie Mae DUS program may increase which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and liquidity. In addition, any failure to pay our share of losses under the Fannie Mae DUS program could result in the revocation of our Fannie Mae license and in the exercise of various remedies available to Fannie Mae under the Fannie Mae DUS program, including the transfer of our servicing portfolio to another Fannie Mae approved servicer.

Reworded

The Agency Business’s results of operations and liquidity could be materially and adversely affected if the GSEs, HUD or institutional investors lower the price they are willing to pay for loans, lower their servicing fees or adversely change the material terms of their loan purchases or servicing arrangements with us. A number of factors determine the price we receive for our agency loans. With respect to Fannie Mae originations, loans are generally sold as Fannie Mae insured securities to third partythird-party investors. For HUD originations, loans are generally sold as Ginnie Mae securities to third partythird-party investors. In both cases, the price paid to us reflects, in part, the competitive market bidding process for these securities.

Reworded

We must make certain representations and warranties concerning each loan we originate for the GSE or HUD programs. The representations and warranties relate to our practices in the originationorigination, underwriting and servicing of the loans and the accuracy of the information being provided by us. For example, we are generally required to provide the following, among other, representations and warranties: we are authorized to do business and to sell or assign the loan; the loan conforms to the requirements of the GSEs or HUD and certain laws and regulations; the underlying mortgage represents a valid first lien on the property and there are no other liens on the property; the loan documents are valid and enforceable; taxes, assessments, insurance premiums, rents and similar other payments have been paid or escrowed; the property is insured, conforms to zoning laws and remains intact; and we do not know of any issues regarding the loan that are reasonably expected to cause the loan to be delinquent or unacceptable for investment or adversely affect its value.

Reworded

In the event of a breach of any representation or warranty, whether because of fraud or negligence, investors could, among other things, require us to repurchase the loan or seek indemnification for losses or, in the case of Fannie Mae, increase the level of risk-sharing on the loan. Our obligation to repurchase the loan is independent of our risk-sharing obligations. The GSEs or HUD could require us to repurchase a loan if representations and warranties are breached, even if the loan is not in default. Because many such representations and warranties are based on third partythird-party reports, such as title reports and environmental reports, we may not receive similar representations and warranties from such third parties that would serve as a claim against them. Even if we receive representations and warranties from such third parties or the borrower, our ability to recover on any such claim may be dependent, in part, upon the financial condition and liquidity of such third party or the borrower. Although we believe that we have capable personnel at all levels, use qualified third parties and have established controls to ensure that all loans are originated pursuant to requirements established by the GSEs and HUD, in addition to our own internal requirements, there can be no assurance that we, our employees or third parties will not make mistakes. Any significant repurchase or indemnification obligations imposed on us could have a material adverse effect on the Agency Business.

Added

We are subject to risks of fraud, misrepresentation and other misconduct by borrowers, brokers, guarantors and other third parties, which could result in credit losses and litigation and may not be fully covered by contractual remedies or insurance.

Added

Our lending and investment activities expose us to the risk that borrowers, brokers, guarantors and other third parties may engage in fraud, intentional misrepresentation, collusion or other misconduct. Such conduct may include, among other things; (1) providing inaccurate or falsified financial statements, rent rolls, leases, draw requests, budgets or project status reports; (2) misrepresenting the condition, occupancy or value of collateral; (3) diverting construction proceeds; (4) submitting forged or altered documents; or (5) engaging in undisclosed conflicts of interest or kickback arrangements.

Added

If fraud or other misconduct occurs, we may experience delays in detecting problems, increased delinquencies, defaults, restructurings and foreclosures, reduced recoveries on collateral and higher costs to service or resolve affected loans. We may also incur expenses and management time associated with investigations, workout activities and litigation or other proceedings, and we could suffer reputational harm. Although we may have recourse, such parties may be unable to satisfy judgments or indemnification obligations, and our recoveries, if any, may not be sufficient to fully compensate us for losses and related costs. In addition, in certain circumstances (including in connection with loans sold or securitized), fraud or other misconduct may trigger repurchase, indemnification or other obligations that could require us to take back loans and hold them on our balance sheet. If we are required to repurchase or otherwise reacquire a loan that is impaired, non-performing or otherwise viewed as ineligible collateral, we may be unable to finance it through our existing facilities or securitizations or may only be able to do so on unfavorable terms, which could increase costs, reduce liquidity and result in additional credit loss provisions or write-downs. As a result, any significant fraud or misconduct involving our counterparties could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

Reworded

We finance our Structured Business loans and investments through a variety of means, including CLOs, securitizations, credit facilities, equity capital, and senior and convertible debt instruments. We finance our Agency Business loan originations, prior to sale to, or securitization by, an agency, through credit facilities provided by commercial banks.banks, as well as the As Soon as Pooled ® Plus ("ASAP") agreement we have with Fannie Mae. Our access to these sources of funding can be impacted by conditions in the financing markets that are beyond our control, including lack of liquidity and wider credit spreads, which we have experienced in the past. If these conditions deteriorate, there can be no assurance that any existing agreements will be renewed or extended at expiration and alternative sources of financing may not be available or may not accommodate our needs. This could subject us to an increase in our recourse indebtedness and the risk that debt service on less efficient forms of financing would require a larger portion of our cash flows, thereby reducing cash available for distribution to our stockholders, funds available for operations as well as for future business opportunities.

Reworded

If the market value of the loans or investments pledged or sold by us to a funding source decline in value, we may be required by the lender to provide additional collateral or pay down a portion of the funds advanced. We may not have the funds available to pay down such future debt, which could result in defaults. Posting additional collateral to support these credit facilities would reduce our liquidity and limit our ability to leverage our assets. In the event we do not have sufficient liquidity to meet such requirements, lenders can accelerate the indebtedness, increase interest rates and terminate our ability to borrow. Further, lenders may require us to maintain a certain amount of uninvested cash or set aside unlevered assets sufficient to maintain a specified liquidity position. As a result, we may not be able to leverage our assets as fullyeffectively as we would choose, which could reduce our return on assets. In the event that we are unable to meet these collateral obligations, our financial condition could deteriorate rapidly.

Removed

We may not be able to find suitable replacement investments during CLO reinvestment periods.

Removed

CLOs have defined periods during which principal payments on assets held in the CLO can be reinvested, commonly referred to as a reinvestment period. Our ability to find investments during the reinvestment period that meet the criteria set forth in the CLO governing documents may determine the success of our CLOs. Our potential inability to find suitable investments may cause, among other things, lower returns, interest deficiencies, hyper-amortization of the senior CLO liabilities and may cause us to reduce the life of the CLO and accelerate the amortization of certain fees and expenses.

Reworded

If any of the loans we originate or acquire and sell or securitize through CLOs do not comply with representations and warranties we make about the loans, the borrowers and the underlying properties, we may be required to repurchase those loans, replace them with substitute loans or indemnify persons for losses or expenses incurred as a result of a breach of a representation or warranty. Repurchased loans typically require a significant allocation of working capital to carry on our books, and our ability to borrow against such assets ismay be limited. Any significant repurchases or indemnification payments could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

Reworded

Our results of operations andoperations, cash flows and liquidity could be adversely affected if thewe are unable to reinvest CLO collateral proceeds in eligible assets during reinvestment periodperiods ofor ourif CLOsreinvestment periods expire without available capacity in existing CLOs,CLOs or theaccess to new CLO issuance ofon newacceptable CLOs.terms.

Added

Our CLOs have defined periods during which principal payments and other collections on assets held in the CLO may be reinvested in new eligible collateral, commonly referred to as a reinvestment period. Our ability to identify and acquire or originate investments during these reinvestment periods that satisfy the eligibility criteria, concentration limits and other requirements set forth in the applicable CLO governing documents is an important determinant of the performance of our CLOs and our ability to manage our structured loan portfolio. If we are unable to find sufficient suitable investments, or if market conditions, underwriting standards, asset supply or CLO eligibility constraints limit our reinvestment opportunities, our CLOs may experience lower returns, interest shortfalls or interest deficiencies, reduced excess cash flow and, in certain circumstances, accelerated amortization or “hyper-amortization” of senior CLO liabilities. In addition, our inability to reinvest collateral proceeds may shorten the effective life of a CLO and may require us to accelerate the amortization or recognition of certain fees and expenses.

Added

Furthermore, if reinvestment periods expire and we do not have capacity in other existing CLOs or are unable to establish or issue new CLOs on acceptable terms, we may be required to hold additional assets outside of CLO structures or finance them through alternative facilities, which may be more expensive or less available. This could result in liquidity constraints, reduced investment flexibility, higher borrowing costs and less cash available for distribution to our stockholders, any of which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

Removed

CLO reinvestment periods provide us with the flexibility to manage our structured loan portfolio effectively as we are able to replace loans that have matured or paid off with newly originated loans and existing loans in our portfolio. If our CLO reinvestment periods end without availability in other existing CLOs, or the establishment of new CLOs, we may face liquidity constraints, reduced investment opportunities, higher borrowing costs, and limited cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Reworded

Securitization transactions also require us to prepare marketing and disclosure materials, including term sheets, offering documents, and prospectuses, that include disclosures regarding the proposed securitization and the assets being securitized. If our marketing and disclosure materials are alleged or found to contain inaccuracies or omissions, we may be liable under federal and state law for damages to third parties that invest in these securitizations, including in circumstances where we relied on a third party in preparing accurate disclosures, and we may incur other expenses and costs in connection with disputing these allegations or settling claims. Additionally, we may retain various third partythird-party service providers when we engage in securitization transactions, including special servicers, trustees, administrative and paying agents, and custodians, among others. We frequently contractually agree to indemnify these service providers against claims and losses they may suffer in connection with the provision of services to us and/or the securitization vehicle. To the extent any of these service providers are liable for damages to third parties that have invested in these securitization transactions, we may incur costs and expenses as a result of these indemnities.

Reworded

As a result of past dislocation of the credit markets, the securitization market has becomeis subject to additional regulation. In particular, pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, various federal agencies have promulgated rules that require issuers in securitizations to retain at least 5% of the risk associated with the securities. To the extent we utilize the securitization market and retain this risk of loss through subordinate interests or B Piece bonds in our securitized debt transactions, thiswe are exposed to losses earlier and to a greater extent than holders of more senior interests, which could reduce our returns on these transactions.

Removed

Our investments financed in foreign locations may involve significant risks.

Removed

We have financed, and, if the opportunities exist in the future, we may continue to finance, certain investments outside of the U.S. Financing investments in foreign locations may expose us to additional risks not typically inherent in the U.S. These risks include changes in exchange control regulations, political and social instability, expropriation, imposition of foreign taxes, less liquid markets, the lack of available information, higher transaction costs, less government supervision of exchanges, brokers and issuers, less developed bankruptcy laws, difficulty in enforcing contractual obligations, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards and greater price volatility.

Removed

Transactions may be denominated in a foreign currency, which would subject us to the risk that the value of a particular currency may change in relation to the U.S. dollar. We may employ hedging techniques to minimize such risk, but we can offer no assurance that we will, in fact, hedge currency risk or, that if we do, such strategies will be effective. As a result, a change in currency exchange rates may adversely affect our profitability if future transactions outside the U.S. are denominated in a foreign currency.

Added

If our Agency Business fails to comply with GSE and HUD program requirements, guidelines or oversight or is adversely affected by changes in applicable regulations or program standards, our costs could increase and our ability to conduct the Agency Business could be restricted, which could materially and adversely affect our results.

Added

Our Agency Business is subject to the requirements, guidelines and oversight of the GSEs and HUD. These requirements include, among other things, minimum net worth, operational liquidity and collateral standards and quality control, reporting and recordkeeping obligations, and our compliance is subject to review and inspection by the GSEs, HUD and other regulatory authorities. These program requirements and regulations are subject to change and may impose additional capital, liquidity, reserve or collateral requirements, or otherwise increase the costs and operational burdens of originating, selling and servicing loans. If we fail to satisfy, or are unable to continue to satisfy, these requirements, we could be subject to heightened supervisory scrutiny, remedial actions, operational restrictions, sanctions or other enforcement measures, any of which could limit our ability to conduct Agency Business and could materially and adversely affect our business and financial results.

Removed

If our Agency Business fails to comply with the regulations and program requirements of the GSEs and HUD, we may lose our approved lender status with these entities and fail to gain additional approvals or licenses for our business. We are also subject to changes in laws, regulations and existing GSE and HUD program requirements, including potential increases in reserve and risk retention requirements that could increase our costs and affect the way we conduct the Agency Business, which could materially and adversely affect our financial results.

Removed

Our Agency Business is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations, and the regulations and policies of the GSEs and HUD. These laws, regulations, rules and policies impose, among other things, minimum net worth, operational liquidity and collateral requirements. Fannie Mae requires the Agency Business to maintain operational liquidity based on a formula that considers the balance of the loan and the level of credit loss exposure (level of risk sharing). Fannie Mae also requires its DUS lenders to maintain collateral, which may include pledged securities, for their risk-sharing obligations. The amount of collateral required under the Fannie Mae DUS program is calculated at the loan level and is based on the balance of the loan, the level of risk-sharing, the seasoning of the loans and the rating of the Fannie Mae DUS lender.

Removed

Regulatory authorities also require the Agency Business to submit financial reports and to maintain a quality control plan for the underwriting, origination and servicing of loans. The Agency Business is also subject to inspection by the GSEs, HUD, and regulatory authorities. Any failure to comply with these requirements could lead to, among other things, the loss of a license as an approved GSE or HUD lender, the inability to gain additional approvals or licenses, the termination of contractual rights without compensation, demands for indemnification or loan repurchases, class action lawsuits and administrative enforcement actions.

Reworded

One of our subsidiaries is required to registerregister, and is subject to regulation, under the Investment Advisers Act, and is subject to regulation under that Act.

Reworded

One of our subsidiaries is subject to the extensive regulation prescribed by the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”). The SEC oversees our activities as a registered investment adviser under this regulatory regime. A failure to comply with the obligations imposed by the Advisers Act, including recordkeeping, advertising, operating requirements, disclosure obligations and prohibitions on fraudulent activities, could result in fines, censure, suspensions of personnel or investing activities or other sanctions, including revocation of our registration as an investment adviser. The regulations under the Advisers Act are designed to protect investors and other clients, and are not designed to protect holders of our publicly traded stock. Even if a sanction imposed against our subsidiary or its personnel involves a small monetary amount, the adverse publicity related to such sanction could harm our reputation and our relationship with our investors and impede our ability to raise additional capital. In addition, compliance with the Advisers Act may requirerequires us to incur additional costs, and these costs may be material.

Reworded

In the past, federal legislation has been proposed to reform the housing finance system, including the GSEs. Several of the bills require the wind down or receivership of the GSEs within a specified period of enactment and place certain restrictions on the GSEs’ activities prior to being wound down or placed into receivership. The Trump Administration has made recent comments indicating that housing finance reform may be on its agenda, however, it is unclear at this time what the Trump Administration’s views are with respect to the future of the GSEs.

Reworded

Cybersecurity incidents and cyberattacks, which include malicious software, ransomware or terrorists attacks, unauthorized attempts to gain access to sensitive, confidential or otherwise protected information related to us and our customers, have been occurring globally at a more frequent and severe level and are expected to continue to increase in frequency and severity in the future. In the course of our business, we gather, transmit and retain confidential information through our information systems.systems and through the systems of various third-party vendors and service providers on whom we rely, including cloud-based technology providers, data processors, property managers, servicers and other counterparties. Although we endeavor to protect confidential information through the implementation of security technologies, processes and procedures, it is possible that an individual or group could penetrate our security systems or those of our third-party providers and access sensitive information about our business, borrowers and employees. Any misappropriation, loss or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information gathered, stored or used by us or by our third-party providers could have a material impact on the operation of our business, including damaging our reputation with our borrowers, employees, third parties and investors. We could also incur significant costs in implementing additional security measures and organizational changes, implementing additional protection technologies, training employees or engaging consultants.consultants and addressing disruptions to critical services, loan closings or servicing activities resulting from cybersecurity incidents involving third-party providers. In addition, we could become subject to litigation from any cybersecurity breach. We have not experienced any material misappropriation, loss or unauthorized disclosure of confidential or personally identifiable information as a result of a cybersecurity breach or otherfrom act,disruptions however,caused aby third-party cybersecurity breach or other act and/or disruption to our information technology systems could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.incidents.

Added

We have not experienced any material misappropriation, loss or unauthorized disclosure of confidential or personally identifiable information as a result of a cybersecurity breach or other act, however, a cybersecurity breach or other act and/or disruption to our information technology systems or to the information technology systems of our third-party providers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Our ability to monitor and influence the cybersecurity practices of third-party providers is limited, and while we seek to influence their practices through cybersecurity requirements and protocols in our contracts with such third-party providers, their security measures may not be sufficient to prevent or mitigate incidents that could adversely affect us. Additionally, the regulatory and disclosure landscape related to cybersecurity continues to evolve. Recently adopted rules require additional disclosures in our periodic reports about our cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance and about material cybersecurity incidents. Failure to maintain effective cybersecurity controls, to properly assess and manage cyber risks, or to timely detect, respond to and disclose cybersecurity incidents in accordance with applicable laws and regulations could subject us to regulatory investigations or enforcement actions, stockholder or other litigation, and reputational damage, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Showing the first 60 of 75 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

32new paragraphs
19removed paragraphs
44reworded paragraphs
6,266 → 7,394words in section

New heading “Subsequent Event.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: default, restructuring, liquidity, interest rate
“This elevated and unpredictable rate environment has resulted in, and may continue to result in, increased payment delinquencies and defaults, increased loan modifications and foreclosures and declining real estate values of certain asset classes, all of which have impacted, and may continue to impact, our future results of operations, financial condition, business prospects and ability to make distributions to our stockholders. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: bankruptcy, default, interest rate
“For pooled assets that share similar risk characteristics, we use a third-party CECL model that incorporates historical loss information and produces probability of default and loss given default metrics to develop loss factors (the “general reserve”). In applying this model, management uses judgment to determine appropriate portfolio pools and to select and evaluate the relevance of forecast inputs, which currently include commercial real estate price indices, unemployment rates and interest rates. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: default, liquidity, interest rate
“Additionally, over the last several months the five and ten-year interest rates have increased substantially with the ten-year rate moving from a low of 3.60% in September 2024 to a high of 4.80% in January 2025 and the forward yield curve is predicting the ten-year rate will remain above 4.50% for the balance of 2025. As discussed earlier, the short term rate curve is expected to continue to decrease in 2025, but only by a nominal additional 25 basis points. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: default, liquidity, interest rate
“Additionally, over the last several months the five and ten-year interest rates have increased substantially with the ten-year rate moving from a low of 3.60% in September 2024 to a high of 4.80% in January 2025 and the forward yield curve is predicting the ten-year rate will remain above 4.50% for the balance of 2025. The short term rate curve is expected to continue to decrease in 2025, but only by a nominal additional 25 basis points. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: litigation, tariff, inflation, interest rate
“Inflation. During 2025, the Federal Reserve has lowered the federal funds rate three times totaling a 75-basis point reduction. General consensus is that the Federal Reserve may continue to lower rates during 2026. This high-interest rate environment, that has persisted longer than anticipated, could persist even longer if certain key economic indicators, such as inflation, fail to align with the Federal Reserve’s expectations. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: default, liquidity, inflation

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

The ongoing adverse economicelevated and market conditions, including inflation, highvolatile interest raterates, environment,along bank failures andwith geopolitical uncertainty, has caused significantsome disruptions and liquidity constraints in manycertain marketsegments segments, includingof the financial services, real estate and credit markets. TheseAs conditionsstated haveearlier, created,this andenvironment mayhas continuealso to create, further dislocations in capital markets andcaused a continual reduction of available liquidity. Instabilitydecrease in the bankingperformance sector,of suchcertain asof theour regionalassets, bankleading failuresto increased delinquencies, defaults and consolidations, further contributed to the tightening liquidity conditions in the equity and capital markets and has affected the availability and increased the cost of capital. The increased cost of credit, or degradation in debt financing terms, has impacted, and may continue to impact, our ability to identify and execute investments on attractive terms, or at all.foreclosures. If our financing sources, borrowers and their tenants continue to be impacted by these adverse economic and market conditions, or by the other risks disclosed in our filings with the SEC, it wouldcould have a material adverse effect on our liquidityliquidity, capital resources and capitalcash resources.flows.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (95)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 12 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the sections of this report entitled “Forward-Looking Statements” and” “Risk Factors,” along with the historical consolidated financial statements including related notes, included in this report.

Reworded

Through our Agency Business, we originate, sell and service a range of multifamily finance products through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae, FHA and HUD. We retain the servicing rights and asset management responsibilities on substantially all loans we originate and sell under the GSE and HUD programs. We are an approved Fannie Mae DUS lender, seller/servicer nationally, a Freddie Mac Optigo® Conventional Loan and SBL lender, seller/servicer,servicer nationally and a HUD MAP and LEAN senior housing/healthcare lender nationally. We also originate and retain the servicing rights on permanent financing loans underwritten using the guidelines of our existing agency loans sold to the GSEs, which we refer to as “Private Label” loans and originate and sell finance products through CMBS programs. We either sell the Private Label loans instantaneously or pool and securitize them and sell certificates in the securitizations to third partythird-party investors, while retaining the highest risk bottom tranche certificate of the securitization.

Reworded

Income earned from ourother structured transactions.investments. Our other structured transactionsinvestments are primarily comprised of investments in equity affiliates, which represent unconsolidated joint venture investments formed to acquire, develop and/or sell real estate-related assets. Operating results from these investments can be difficult to predict and can vary significantly period-to-period. WhenWe interest rates rise, the income from these investments can be significantly and negatively impacted, particularly from our investment in a residential mortgage banking business, since rising interest rates generally decrease the demand for residential real estate loans. In addition, wealso periodically receive distributions from our equity investments. It is difficult to forecast the timing of such payments, which can be substantial in any given quarter. We account for structured transactions within our Structured Business.

Added

•Entered into a $1.22 billion repurchase facility to refinance loans previously held in our CLOs. The facility has a 24-month reinvestment period through March 2027. The facility has an interest rate of SOFR plus 1.85% and matures at the latest maturity date of all purchased assets, which is currently June 2028;

Added

•Terminated five credit and repurchase facilities with a total committed amount of $1.13 billion;

Added

•Issued $500.0 million of 7.875% senior unsecured notes due 2030 and $400.0 million of 8.50% senior unsecured notes due 2028 through private offerings. A portion of the net proceeds were used to repay the outstanding 7.50% convertible senior notes and the 7.75% senior notes, and will be used to repay the 5.00% senior notes due April 2026 totaling $557.5 million;

Added

•Closed two new CLO vehicles (BTR CLO 1 and CLO 20) totaling $1.85 billion, of which $1.62 billion consisted of investment grade notes. We retained $41.0 million of the investment grade notes, along with the below investment grade notes totaling $236.1 million;

Reworded

•Unwound CLOCLOs 15,14, 16 and 19, redeeming the remaining $1.56 billion of outstanding notes,notes and paid down outstanding notes on existing securitizations totaling $1.65$841.7 billionmillion; on our other securitizations;and

Removed

•Entered into three new debt facilities totaling $900.0 million of warehouse capacity, amended existing facilities resulting in a net $50.0 million increase in the committed amounts of these facilities and terminated three facilities totaling $400.0 million;

Removed

•Raised $100.0 million from the issuance of our 9.00% senior notes and repaid our 4.75% and 5.75% senior notes totaling $200.0 million;

Removed

•Entered into a new equity distribution agreement with JMP to sell up to 30,000,000 shares of our common stock and raised $10.0 million of capital under the plan from the issuance of 661,708 shares at an average price of $15.16 per share; and

Reworded

•RepurchasedRaised $11.4net proceeds of $70.6 million from the issuance of our5,898,957 shares of common stock under our ATM program at an average price of $12.19$11.97 per share.

Reworded

•Reduced our balanceBalance sheet portfolio byof 10%$12.11 tobillion, $11.30as loan originations of $3.52 billion onoutpaced loan runoff of $2.69 billion, which outpaced loan originations totaling $1.43$2.21 billion;

Reworded

•Modified 10643 loans with a total UPB of $4.12$1.71 billion. Borrowersbillion, of 63which of these36 loans withwere a total UPB of $2.39 billion invested additional capitalmodified to recapitalize their deals in exchange forprovide temporary rate relief, which we providedrelief through a pay and accrual feature.feature, Seesee Note 3 for details; and

Added

•Received cash distributions totaling $81.5 million and recognized income of $54.3 million from our equity investments in the Lexford Portfolio ("Lexford") and a residential mortgage banking business, see Note 8 for details; and

Added

•Foreclosed on and took back the underlying collateral on 21 loans with a total net carrying value of $590.5 million and charged-off $52.8 million of specific CECL reserves. We sold the underlying collateral on 8 of these foreclosures with a total net carrying value of $193.1 million. In addition, we sold 2 existing REO assets with a net carrying value of $72.0 million.

Removed

•Sold a real estate owned asset for $14.2 million and recognized a $3.8 million gain.

Reworded

•LoanServicing portfolio of $36.20 billion (up $2.73 billion) with loan originations totaledtotaling $4.47$5.07 billionbillion, andwhich includes $1.58$669.4 billionmillion of new agencyAgency loans that were recaptured from our Structured Business runoff; andrunoff.

Added

Subsequent Event.

Added

•In January and February 2026, we repurchased 2,444,860 shares of our common stock under our share repurchase program at a total cost of $18.0 million and an average cost of $7.38 per share; and

Added

•In 2026, we foreclosed on two loans with a total UPB of $33.9 million.

Removed

•Grew our fee-based servicing portfolio 8%, or $2.49 billion, to $33.47 billion.

Added

During 2025, the Federal Reserve has lowered the federal funds rate three times totaling a 75-basis point reduction. General consensus is that the Federal Reserve may continue to lower rates during 2026. The high-interest rate environment, that has persisted longer than anticipated, could persist even longer if certain key economic indicators, such as inflation, fail to align with the Federal Reserve’s expectations. Although short-term interest rates have declined, long-term interest rates remain highly volatile since the announcement of the current administration's imposition of increased tariffs and macroeconomic uncertainty. Analysts currently hold mixed expectations regarding the future trajectory of long-term rates in 2026 due to the uncertainty regarding long-term inflation, fiscal policy, increased federal spending and larger deficits as a result of the recent enactment of the OBBBA, as described below.

Added

As a result of the significant volatility in rates, the unpredictable impact of the tariff negotiations, including certain litigations in connection with the tariffs, and the OBBBA, it is very difficult to predict where short and long-term rates will settle during 2026.

Added

This elevated and unpredictable rate environment has resulted in, and may continue to result in, increased payment delinquencies and defaults, increased loan modifications and foreclosures and declining real estate values of certain asset classes, all of which have impacted, and may continue to impact, our future results of operations, financial condition, business prospects and ability to make distributions to our stockholders. Additionally, this high-interest rate environment has limited our ability to resolve delinquent loans, leading to additional foreclosures and REO assets on our balance sheet, all of which could have a further material adverse effect on our future results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and ability to make distributions to our stockholders. When we foreclose on assets as REO, we typically seek to reposition them to maximize value and support an orderly disposition. Our repositioning efforts may include implementing enhanced property management, completing targeted capital improvements and deferred maintenance, re-leasing vacant space, renewing or restructuring leases, and pursuing other stabilization initiatives intended to improve occupancy, cash flow and marketability. Depending on market conditions and asset-specific considerations, we generally pursue a disposition strategy through sale to third parties, and in certain circumstances may explore alternative exit options such as recapitalizations, joint venture arrangements or other transactions intended to optimize recoveries and reduce our REO exposure.

Added

We employ rigorous risk management and underwriting practices to proactively maintain the quality of our loan portfolio and work very closely with borrowers to mitigate potential losses, while safeguarding the integrity of our portfolio, which may result in the continuation of modifying loan terms. Given the current elevated interest rate environment, we cannot guarantee that our loan portfolio will continue to perform under the current loan terms.

Removed

The Federal Reserve lowered the federal funds rate three times during 2024 for a total reduction of 100 basis points, which marks the first rate cuts since 2020, and it is possible that they will continue to reduce short term rates in 2025. Although short term rates have declined 100 basis points, we currently remain in a high interest rate environment which could remain higher for longer than expected if inflation and other economic indicators do not continue to meet the Federal Reserve’s expectations. These adverse economic conditions have resulted in, and may continue to result in, a dislocation in capital markets, declining real estate values of certain asset classes, increased payment delinquencies and defaults and increased loan modifications and foreclosures, all of which has impacted, and may continue to impact, our future results of operations, financial condition, business prospects and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. We employ rigorous risk management and underwriting practices to proactively maintain the quality of our loan portfolio and work very closely with borrowers to mitigate potential losses, while safeguarding the integrity of our portfolio, which may include modifying original loan terms. Given the current elevated interest rate environment, we cannot guarantee that our loan portfolio will perform under the current loan terms.

Removed

Additionally, over the last several months the five and ten-year interest rates have increased substantially with the ten-year rate moving from a low of 3.60% in September 2024 to a high of 4.80% in January 2025 and the forward yield curve is predicting the ten-year rate will remain above 4.50% for the balance of 2025. As discussed earlier, the short term rate curve is expected to continue to decrease in 2025, but only by a nominal additional 25 basis points. This current interest rate environment is creating increased headwinds for commercial real estate and is likely to result in decreased origination volumes, especially in our GSE/Agency business in 2025, which is a highly profitable segment of our overall business. This rate environment will also affect the ability for borrowers to refinance their balance sheet loans with fixed rate agency product, which could increase our delinquencies and defaults and reduce available liquidity. This environment could also limit our ability to resolve delinquent loans, leading to potential additional foreclosures and REO assets on our balance sheet, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Reworded

Historically,In thegeneral, higha interestrising or high-interest rate environment has positively impactedimpacts our net interest income since our structured loan portfolio exceeds our corresponding debt balancesbalances, and the vast majority of our loan portfolio is floating rate based on SOFR. Additionally, since a greatersizable portion of our debt consists of fixed-rate instruments (such as convertible and senior unsecured notes), as compared to our structured loan portfolio, the increase in interest income from high interest rates tends to outpace the rise in interest expense on our debt. Furthermore, our earnings on escrows and cash balances also benefit from an elevated rate environment. However, the prolonged period of elevated interest rates has also led to ana significant increase in loan delinquencies, amodifications, decreaseforeclosures and decreases in loan originations and lower cash and escrow balances, which is having, and may continue to have, a negative impact on our net interest income. Additionally, the prolonged high interesthigh-interest rate environment has contributed to a decline in certain commercial real estate values, leading to increased reserves, aswhen the collateral value is considered insufficient to fully repay the loans.

Reworded

AsThe discussedabove earlier,mentioned the Federal Reserve began lowering short termshort-term interest rates in 2024 and may continue to cut interest rates during 2025. These rate reductions have resulted inresulted, and will continue to resultresult, in a decrease in the net interest income on our floating rate loan book and reductions in the earnings on our cash and escrow balances. For additional details, please see “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” below.

Removed

Inflation, high interest rates, bank failures, and geopolitical uncertainty has caused significant disruptions in many market segments, including the financial services, real estate and credit markets, which has, and may continue to, result in a further dislocation in capital markets and a continued reduction of available liquidity. Despite these periodic disruptions, we have been successful in raising capital through various vehicles, when needed, to continue to operate and strengthen our business.

Reworded

InstabilityThe elevated and volatile interest rates, along with geopolitical uncertainty, has caused some disruptions in certain segments of the financial services, real estate and credit markets. As stated earlier, this environment has also caused a decrease in the bankingperformance sector,of suchcertain asof our assets, leading to increased defaults and delinquencies. If our borrowers and their tenants continue to be impacted by these adverse economic and market conditions, or by the multipleother regionalrisks bankdisclosed failuresin andour consolidations,filings further contributed towith the tighteningSEC, it could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity conditions in the equity and capital marketsresources. andDespite hasthese affectedperiodic thedisruptions, availability,we andhave increasedbeen the cost, of capital. The increased cost of credit, or degradationsuccessful in debtraising financingcapital terms,through hasvarious impacted,vehicles, andwhen mayneeded, to continue to impact,operate and strengthen our ability to identify and execute investments on attractive terms, or at all.business. Additionally, although the majority of our cash is currently on deposit with major financial institutions, our balances often exceed insured limits. We limit the exposure relating to these balances by diversifying them among various counterparties. Generally, deposits may be redeemed upon demand and are maintained at financial institutions with reputable credit andand, thereforetherefore, we believe we bear minimal credit risk.

Reworded

We are a national originator with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and the GSEs remain the most significant providers of capital to the multifamily market. FHFA set its 20252026 Caps for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac at $73$88 billion for each enterprise for a total opportunity of $146$176 billion, which is an increase from its 20242025 Caps of $70$73 billion for each enterprise. FHFA stated they will continue to monitor the market and reserves the right to increase the 20252026 Caps if warranted, however, they will not reduce the 20252026 Caps if the market is smaller than initially projected. To promote affordable housing preservation, loans classified as supporting workforce housing properties will be exempt from the 20252026 Caps. Workforce housing loans preserve rents at affordable levels in multifamily properties, typically without the use of public subsidies. The 20252026 Caps will continue to mandate that at least 50% be directed towards mission driven, affordable housing, with affordability levels corresponding to 80%-120% of area median income, depending on the market. Our originations with the GSEs are highly profitable executions as they provide significant gains from the sale of our loans, non-cash gains related to MSRs, and servicing revenues. As discussed above, the current high interest rate environment could lead to a decline in our GSE originations, which could negatively impact our financial results. We are also unsure whether FHFA will impose stricter limitations on GSE multifamily production volume in the future.

Added

On July 4, 2025, the OBBBA was enacted into law. This comprehensive legislation introduces wide-ranging changes to federal tax policy, entitlement programs, immigration enforcement and infrastructure investment. The OBBBA includes potential changes to broader corporate tax provisions that may affect certain aspects of our business operations and tax exposure over the course of the next few years. Additionally, various indirect components of the legislation, such as modifications to entitlement funding, increased federal spending and shifts in fiscal and regulatory priorities, may influence the capital markets, interest rate environment and demand for commercial real estate finance. We are reviewing the potential implications of the new law, including interpretive guidance related to corporate taxation, and as a result of the complexity of the legislation and the evolving nature of its implementation, it is difficult to predict the effects of this legislation on our business, financial condition, results of operations or the real estate markets in general.

Reworded

Our Structured loan and investment portfolio balance was $11.30$12.11 billion and $12.62$11.30 billion at December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively. This decreaseincrease was primarily due to loan runofforiginations exceeding loan originationsrunoff by $1.27$1.31 billion.billion See(see below for details.details), partially offset by loans we foreclosed on and received ownership of the underlying collateral as REO assets.

Reworded

OurThe portfolio had a weighted average current interest pay rate of 6.90%6.49% and 8.42%6.90% at December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively. Including certain fees earned and costs, the weighted average current interest rate was 7.80%7.08% and 8.98%7.80% at December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively. Our debt that finances our Structured loan and investment portfolio totaled $9.46$10.46 billion and $11.57$9.46 billion at December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively, with a weighted average funding cost of 6.55%6.16% and 7.14%,6.55%, respectively, which excludes financing costs. Including financing costs, the weighted average funding rate was 6.88%6.45% and 7.45%6.88% at December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively.

Reworded

Loans held-for-sale from the Agency Business decreased $115.9$26.7 million, primarily from loan sales exceeding originations by $30.2 million as noted in the following table. Activity from our Agency Business portfolio is comprised of the following ($ in thousands):

Added

Investments in equity affiliates decreased $18.3 million, primarily due to $22.0 million in distributions received from the completed sale of the residential mortgage banking business.

Removed

Capitalized mortgage servicing rights decreased $22.6 million, primarily due to amortization and prepayment write-downs totaling $76.9 million exceeding additions from new originations of $54.3 million.

Reworded

Real estate owned, netowned increased $89.6$322.4 million, primarily fromdue to the foreclosure of threesixteen structuredmultifamily bridge loans wheretotaling $441.0 million, through which we took back the underlying collateralcollateral, aspartially REOoffset assets.by the sale of five multifamily properties.

Removed

Due from related party decreased $51.6 million, primarily due to funds from loan payoffs being remitted to us by our affiliated servicing operations related to real estate transactions.

Removed

Other assets increased $78.2 million, primarily due to additional fundings of unsecured line of credit loans totaling $41.7 million and an increase in deferred interest on modified loans.

Reworded

Credit and repurchase facilities increased $321.7$1.59 million,billion, primarily due to refinancing loans from the unwind of three CLOs and loan originations exceeding runoff in our Structured Business, substantiallypartially offset by loanthe salesissuance exceedingof originationsBTR inCLO our1 Agencyand Business.CLO 20.

Reworded

Securitized debt decreased $2.31$1.15 billion, primarily due to the unwind of CLOthree 15CLOs totaling $1.56 billion and paydowns on our existing securitizations totalingof $1.65$841.7 billion.million, partially offset by the issuances of BTR CLO 1 and CLO 20 where we issued $1.46 billion of notes to third-party investors.

Reworded

Senior unsecured notes decreasedincreased $97.8$792.9 million, primarily due to theour repaymentissuance of our$900.0 4.75%million andof 5.75%senior notesunsecured totaling $200.0 million,notes, partially offset by the issuance of $100.0 millionsettlement of our 9.00%$95.0 million 7.75% senior unsecured notes.

Added

In August 2025, we fully redeemed our 7.50% convertible senior notes with a remaining outstanding balance of $287.5 million with a portion of the net proceeds received from our 7.875% senior unsecured notes that were issued in July 2025.

Added

Notes payable - real estate owned increased $148.1 million, primarily due to the addition of notes payable totaling $197.2 million on new REO assets and financing received on an existing REO asset, partially offset by the payoff of $49.1 million of notes payable associated with the sale of REO assets.

Removed

Mortgage notes payable - real estate owned increased $30.6 million primarily due to financing placed on two new REO assets.

Removed

Due to borrowers decreased $74.1 million, primarily due to the funding of previously unfunded loan commitments in our Structured Business.

Removed

Other liabilities decreased $18.5 million, primarily due to a decrease in accrued interest payable as a result of the unwind of CLO 15 and paydowns on remaining securitizations, along with a decrease in deferred tax liabilities.

Reworded

(2)Delinquent loans reflect loans that are contractually 60 days or more past due. At December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, delinquent loans totaled $524.5$959.0 million and $411.1$524.5 million, respectively. At December 31, 2025, there were five loans totaling $56.0 million in bankruptcy and nineteen loans totaling $176.5 million were foreclosed. At December 31, 2024, there were two loans totaling $4.8 million in bankruptcy and six loans totaling $28.2 million have beenwere foreclosed. At December 31, 2023, there were two loans totaling $4.8 million in bankruptcy and no loans in foreclosure.

Reworded

The decrease in interest income was mainly due to a $166.7$221.8 million decrease from our Structured Business. The decline was primarily fromdue to a decrease in the average yield on core interest-earning assets and, to a lesser extent, a decrease in the average balance of our core interest-earning assets as (loan runoff exceeded loan originations,originations asin well2024) asand alower average bank balances. The decrease in the average yield onwas core interest-earning assetsmainly from a risedecrease in non-performingSOFR, the reversal of interest that was previously accrued on modified loans and othera non-accruedreduction loans.in back interest earned on delinquent and modified loans, as well as an increase in new delinquencies and modified loans at lower rates.

Reworded

The decrease in interest expense was mainly due to a $98.9$105.0 million decrease from our Structured Business, primarily due to a decline in the average balance of our interest-bearing liabilities (from a decrease in the average loan runoffportfolio and note paydowns in our securitizations) and seniora unsecured notes, partially offset by an increasereduction in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities,liabilities (mainly from lowera ratedecrease debtin tranches being paid down from CLO runoff.SOFR).

Reworded

The increasedecrease in gain on sales, including fee-based services, net was primarily due to a 10%15% increasedecrease in the sales margin from 1.48%1.63% to 1.63%,1.38%, partially offset by aan 6%11% decreaseincrease in loan sales volume ($279.5$494.8 million). The decrease in the sales margin was mainly due to the sales volume product mix and larger portfolio deals in 2025 that produced lower margins.

Reworded

The decreaseincrease in income from MSRs was primarily due to a 15% decreaseincrease in loan commitment volume ($763.2$659.9 million), andpartially offset by a 14%7% decrease in the MSR rate from 1.34%1.15% to 1.15%.1.07%. The decrease in the MSR rate was primarilymainly due to a higherdecrease percentagein ofthe FreddieFannie MacMae loanMSR commitments,rates which containfrom lower servicing fees.rates on newer loans, as a result of larger portfolio deals in 2025 that produced lower MSR rates.

Reworded

The decrease in servicing revenue, net was primarily due to a decrease in earnings on escrow balances from lower average balances and lowera prepaymentdecrease fees,in the applicable interest rate, partially offset by an increase in servicing fees due to growth in our servicing portfolio.

Added

The increases in property operating income and expenses were due to the addition of several new REO assets, which also resulted in an increase in depreciation and amortization.

Reworded

The (loss)gains gainand losses on derivative instruments in both 20242025 and 20232024 were related to changes in the fair values of our forward sale commitments and swaps held by our Agency Business as a result of changes in market interest rates as well as from the timing of GSE Agency loan sales.rates.

Added

The increase in other income, net was primarily due to increases in the fair values of our Private Label loans and loan fees from higher loan originations and modified loans.

Reworded

The increasedecrease in employee compensation and benefits expense was primarily due to increasesdecreases in commissions and incentive compensation and commissions from higherlower GSE/Agency loan sales volume and bonus allocation targets and annual merit increases.targets.

Showing the first 60 of 95 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-07-31 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-05-08 (period ending 2026-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

0new paragraphs
0removed paragraphs
0reworded paragraphs
20 → 20words in section

The section in the latest 10-Q reads in full:

There have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Item 1A of our 2025 Annual Report.

No wording changes found in this section.

Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

43new paragraphs
6removed paragraphs
54reworded paragraphs
5,997 → 7,536words in section

New heading “Gain (Loss) on Real Estate”

New heading “Income from Equity Affiliates”

New heading “Provision for Income Taxes”

New heading “Net (Loss) Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest”

New heading “Comparison of Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”

New heading “Net Interest Income”

New heading “Agency Business Revenue”

New heading “Other Income (Loss)”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Reworded topics: inflation, labor

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Inflation. During 2025, the Federal Reserve lowered the federal funds rate three times for an aggregate 75-basis point reduction. During the first half of 2026, the Federal Reserve maintained the target range for the federal funds rate at 3.50% to 3.75%. Current market expectations generallyremain contemplateuncertain and have shifted during 2026, with the potentialtiming forand andirection of any additional ratemonetary cutpolicy inactions thedependent fourthon quarterinflation, oflabor 2026,market butconditions, thoseeconomic expectationsgrowth mayand abatefinancial ifmarket impactsconditions. Although short-term rates have declined from recenttheir geopolitical events have a longer lasting effect onpeaks, the economic environment and inflationary measurements. However, the elevated rate environment remains elevated, has persistedremained elevated longer than anticipated and could persist even longer if inflation and other key economic indicators do not align with the Federal Reserve’s expectations. While short-term rates have declined,Additionally, long-term rates remain volatile following the current administration’s adoption of increased tariffs, related litigation, geopolitical developments, including the conflict ininvolving Iran,Iran and related energy market volatility, and broader macroeconomic uncertainty. Expectations for long-term rates in 2026 remain mixed, reflecting uncertainty around long-term inflation, fiscal policy, increased federal spending and larger deficits, including the effects of the OBBBA. Accordingly, it remains difficult to predict where short- and long-term rates will settle during the remainder of 2026.
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: inflation, labor

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

During 2025, the Federal Reserve lowered the federal funds rate three times for an aggregate 75-basis point reduction. During the first half of 2026, the Federal Reserve maintained the target range for the federal funds rate at 3.50% to 3.75%. Current market expectations generallyremain contemplateuncertain and have shifted during 2026, with the potentialtiming forand andirection of any additional ratemonetary cutpolicy inactions thedependent fourthon quarterinflation, oflabor 2026,market butconditions, thoseeconomic expectationsgrowth mayand abatefinancial ifmarket impactsconditions. Although short-term rates have declined from recenttheir geopolitical events have a longer lasting effect onpeaks, the economic environment and inflationary measurements. However, the elevated rate environment remains elevated, has persistedremained elevated longer than anticipated and could persist even longer if inflation and other key economic indicators do not align with the Federal Reserve’s expectations. While short-term rates have declined,Additionally, long-term rates remain volatile following the current administration’s adoption of increased tariffs, related litigation, geopolitical developments, including the conflict involving Iran,Iran and related energy market volatility, and broader macroeconomic uncertainty. Expectations for long-term rates in 2026 remain mixed, reflecting uncertainty around long-term inflation, fiscal policy, increased federal spending and larger deficits, including the effects of the July 2025 enactment of the OBBBA, as described below. Accordingly, it remains difficult to predict where short- and long-term rates will settle during the remainder of 2026.
see in full comparison
New text
“Comparison of Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”
see in full comparison
New text
“Net (Loss) Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest”
see in full comparison
New text
“Income from Equity Affiliates”
see in full comparison
New text
“Gain (Loss) on Real Estate”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (103)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 3 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Significant Developments During the FirstSecond Quarter of 2026

Added

•Unwound CLO 17, redeeming the remaining outstanding notes totaling $787.0 million, which were repaid from the availability in our credit and repurchase facilities; and

Removed

•Closed a collateralized securitization vehicle (CLO 21) totaling $762.6 million, of which $674.0 million consisted of investment grade notes and $88.6 million of below investment grade notes were retained by us; and

Reworded

•We repurchased 4,117,9013,550,691 shares of our common stock under our share repurchase program at a total cost of $30.7$20.8 millionmillion, andexcluding broker commission fees, representing an average cost of $7.46$5.85 per share.

Reworded

•Balance sheet portfolio of $12.00$12.11 billion,billion; asloan originations of $689.0 million outpaced loan runoff totaling $861.0 million outpaced loan originations of $767.6$539.7 million;

Reworded

•We foreclosed on and took back the underlying collateral on threefive loans with an aggregate net carrying value of $58.8$110.1 million and recorded a loss of $1.8$2.5 million through provision for credit losses. We sold one of thosetwo foreclosed properties, along with anthree existing REO asset,assets for $33.0$79.8 million and recognized an aggregate lossgain of $2.1$0.1 million through gain (loss) on real estate. See Notes 3 and 9 for details.

Reworded

Agency Business Activity. Servicing portfolio of $36.31$36.70 billion (up $107.3$393.3 million) with loan originations totaling $707.6$1.08 million, which includes $218.5 million of new Agency loans that were recaptured from our Structured Business runoff.billion.

Added

Subsequent Event. In July 2026, we issued $375.0 million of 6.25% Convertible Notes due July 2029. We used the net proceeds to repurchase 2,140,300 shares of our common stock for $11.6 million, repurchase $102.7 million of our common stock pursuant to a prepaid forward transaction and used the remaining net proceeds, together with cash on hand, to redeem, in full, our outstanding $270.0 million 4.50% senior unsecured notes due in September 2026. See Note 10 for further details.

Removed

Dividend. We declared a cash dividend of $0.17 per share, a reduction from our previous quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share.

Reworded

During 2025, the Federal Reserve lowered the federal funds rate three times for an aggregate 75-basis point reduction. During the first half of 2026, the Federal Reserve maintained the target range for the federal funds rate at 3.50% to 3.75%. Current market expectations generallyremain contemplateuncertain and have shifted during 2026, with the potentialtiming forand andirection of any additional ratemonetary cutpolicy inactions thedependent fourthon quarterinflation, oflabor 2026,market butconditions, thoseeconomic expectationsgrowth mayand abatefinancial ifmarket impactsconditions. Although short-term rates have declined from recenttheir geopolitical events have a longer lasting effect onpeaks, the economic environment and inflationary measurements. However, the elevated rate environment remains elevated, has persistedremained elevated longer than anticipated and could persist even longer if inflation and other key economic indicators do not align with the Federal Reserve’s expectations. While short-term rates have declined,Additionally, long-term rates remain volatile following the current administration’s adoption of increased tariffs, related litigation, geopolitical developments, including the conflict involving Iran,Iran and related energy market volatility, and broader macroeconomic uncertainty. Expectations for long-term rates in 2026 remain mixed, reflecting uncertainty around long-term inflation, fiscal policy, increased federal spending and larger deficits, including the effects of the July 2025 enactment of the OBBBA, as described below. Accordingly, it remains difficult to predict where short- and long-term rates will settle during the remainder of 2026.

Reworded

This prolonged rate environment has resulted,resulted in, and may continue to result,result inin, higher payment delinquencies and defaults, more loan modifications and foreclosures and declines in real estate values in certain asset classes, which have adversely affected, and may continue to adversely affect, our results of operations, financial condition, business prospects, liquidity and ability to make distributions to stockholders. It has also made it more difficult to resolve delinquent loans, contributing to additional foreclosures and REO assets on our balance sheet. When we take title to assets through foreclosure, we generally seek to dispose of these assets through third-party sales. However, depending on market conditions and asset-specific factors, we may evaluate other alternatives, such as recapitalizations and joint venture structures, intended to optimize recoveries and reduce our REO exposure. These efforts may include enhanced property management, capital improvements and deferred maintenance, re-leasing vacant space, renewing or restructuring leases and other stabilization initiatives designed to improve occupancy, cash flow and marketability.

Reworded

We continue to apply disciplined underwriting and risk management practices and work closely with borrowers to protect portfolio quality and mitigate potential losses, including, where appropriate, modifying loan terms. However, given the current interest rate environment,environment and inflationary pressures, we cannot assure that our loan portfolio will continue to perform in accordance with current contractual terms.

Reworded

An elevated rate environment generally benefits our net interest income because our structured loan portfolio exceeds our corresponding debt balances, the substantial majority of our loan portfolio is floating rate based on SOFR and a meaningful portion of our debt, including senior unsecured notes, is fixed rate. As a result, increases in interest income generally tendstend to outpace increases in interest expense, and earnings on our cash and escrow balances also benefit from higher rates. These benefits, however, have been increasingly offset by the adverse effects of a prolonged elevated rate environment, including higher delinquencies, more loan modifications and foreclosures, lower loan originations, reduced cash and escrow balances and pressure on certain commercial real estate values, which can result in higher reserves when collateral values are considered insufficient to fully repay loans.

Reworded

The recent reductions in short-term interest rates have reduced, and are expected to continue to reduce, net interest income on our floating rate loan portfolio and earnings on our cash and escrow balances. In addition, if short-term interest rates decline further, our interest income and earnings on cash and escrow balances could decline further, while the benefit to our interest expense may be limited to the extent our debt is fixed rate or does not reprice at the same pace. Conversely, if short-term or long-term rates increase, or remain elevated for an extended period, borrower performance, collateral values, loan origination volumes, transaction activity and our ability to resolve delinquent loans could be further adversely affected. For additional information, see “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” below.

Reworded

Assets — Comparison of balances at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 to December 31, 2025:

Reworded

Our Structured loan and investment portfolio balance was $12.00 billion andapproximately $12.11 billion at Marchboth 31,June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025. There was a slight decrease from December 31, 2025, respectively. This decreasewhich was primarily due to loan runoff exceeding loan originations by $93.4 million (see below for details) and by loans we foreclosed on and received ownership of the underlying collateral as REO assets.assets, substantially offset by loan originations exceeding loan runoff by $55.8 million (see below for details).

Reworded

The portfolio had a weighted average current interest pay rate of 6.50% and 6.49% at bothJune March 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025.2025, respectively. Including certain fees earned and costs, the weighted average current interest rate was 7.03%6.95% and 7.08% at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. Our debt that finances our Structured loan and investment portfolio totaled $10.71$10.48 billion and $10.46 billion at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively, with a weighted average funding cost of 6.13%6.10% and 6.16%, respectively, which excludes financing costs. Including financing costs, the weighted average funding rate was 6.40%6.38% and 6.45%, at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025. respectively.

Reworded

Loans held-for-sale from the Agency Business increaseddecreased $34.1$33.3 million, primarily from loan originationssales exceeding salesoriginations by $36.6$30.1 million as noted in the following table ($ in thousands):

Added

Investments in equity affiliates increased $24.8 million, primarily due to a $25.0 million investment in a multifamily property in the second quarter.

Reworded

Real estate owned increased $21.8$47.0 million, primarily due to the foreclosure of twoeight multifamily bridge loans totaling $34.0$171.6 million, through which we took back the underlying collateral, partially offset by the sale of oneseven multifamily property.properties for $112.8 million.

Removed

Due from related party increased $28.7 million, primarily due to funds from payoffs to be remitted by our affiliated servicing operations related to real estate transactions at the end of the reporting period. These amounts were remitted to us in April 2026.

Reworded

Other assets decreased $27.5$20.6 million, primarily due to the payoff of an unsecured line of credit loan.loans and a decrease in interest receivable mainly due to the collection of deferred interest on modified/delinquent loans.

Reworded

Liabilities – Comparison of balances at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 to December 31, 2025:

Reworded

Credit and repurchase facilities decreasedincreased $181.7$662.6 million, primarily due to the transfer of loans into arepurchase facilities from the unwind of CLO and loan runoff in our Structured Business portfolio, partially offset by loan originations exceeding sales in our Agency Business.17.

Reworded

Securitized debt increaseddecreased $463.2$496.0 million, primarily due to the closingunwind of CLO 17 totaling $1.06 billion and paydowns on our existing securitizations totaling $182.7 million, partially offset by the issuance of CLO 21 where we issued $674.0 million of notes to third-party investors, partially offset by paydowns on our existing securitizations of $248.4 million.investors.

Added

Senior unsecured notes decreased $171.3 million, primarily due to the redemption of our $175.0 million 5.00% senior unsecured notes in April 2026.

Reworded

Notes payable — real estate owned increased $30.2$47.4 million, primarily due to the addition of notes payable on athree new REO assetassets and additional financing received on two existing REO assets.

Reworded

Other liabilities decreased $35.1$14.5 million, primarily due to payments of accrued incentive compensation and commissions during the first quarterhalf of 2026, related to 2025 performance.

Reworded

See Note 16 for details of our issuances of common stock, dividends declared and deferred compensation transactions.

Reworded

(2)Delinquent loans reflect loans that are contractually 60 days or more past due. At MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, delinquent loans totaled $975.4$1.12 millionbillion and $959.0 million, respectively. At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, there were fivefour loans totaling $56.0$22.6 million in bankruptcy and twenty-fiveforty-two loans totaling $313.5$422.2 million were foreclosed. At December 31, 2025, there were five loans totaling $56.0 million in bankruptcy and nineteen loans totaling $176.5 million were foreclosed.

Reworded

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025

Reworded

The decrease in interest income was mainly due to a $5.7$10.8 million decrease from our Structured Business. The decline was primarily due to a decrease in the average yield on core interest-earning assets, partially offset by an increase in the average balance of our core interest-earning assets (loan originations exceeded runoff in 2025) and, to a lesser extent, higher average bank balances. The decrease in the average yield was mainly from a decrease in SOFR, a reduction in back interest earned on delinquent and modified loansSOFR and an increase in new delinquencies and modified loans at lower rates.

Reworded

The increase in interest expense was mainly due to a $9.2$6.2 million increase from our Structured Business, primarily due to an increase in the average balance of our interest-bearing liabilities from an increase in the average loan portfolio and the issuance of senior unsecured notes. This was partially offset by note paydowns in our securitizations, the payoff of our 7.50% convertible senior notes and a reduction in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities (mainly from a decrease in SOFR).

Reworded

The decreaseincrease in gain on sales, including fee-based services, net was primarily due to a 8%42% decreaseincrease in loan sales volume ($59.9$336.4 million), partially offset by a 6%21% increasedecrease in the sales margin from 1.75%1.69% to 1.86%.1.33%. The increasedecrease in the sales margin was mainly due to a decrease in the Fannie Mae sales margin, which includes the impact of larger portfolio mixdeals in 2026 that producedproduce higherlower margins.

Added

The increase in income from MSRs was primarily due to a 42% increase in loan commitment volume ($359.1 million), partially offset by 22% decrease in the MSR rate from 1.28% to 1.00%. The decrease in the MSR rate was mainly due to a higher concentration of Freddie Mac loan commitment volume, which generate lower servicing fees.

Added

The decrease in servicing revenue, net was primarily due to a decrease in earnings on escrow balances from lower average balances and a decrease in the applicable interest rate, partially offset by an increase in servicing fees due to growth in our servicing portfolio.

Removed

The increase in income from MSRs was primarily due to a 14% increase in loan commitment volume ($88.5 million).

Reworded

The increases in property operating income and expenses were due to the addition of several new REO assets. This is also the reason for the increase in depreciation and amortization.

Reworded

The gains and losses on derivative instruments in 2026 and 2025 were related to changes in the fair values of our forward sale commitments and swaps held by our Agency Business as a result of changes in market interest rates.

Added

The decrease in other income, net was primarily due to increases in the fair value of our Private Label loans from our Agency Business recognized in 2025, as well as a decrease in loan modification fees.

Added

Other Expenses

Added

The increase in employee compensation and benefits expense was primarily due to higher salaries and incentive compensation associated with executive-level hires, merit-based compensation increases for existing employees and higher commissions resulting from increased GSE/Agency loan sales volume. These increases were partially offset by a reduction in overall headcount.

Added

In 2026, we recorded a $13.7 million impairment loss related to certain REO assets that we acquired through foreclosure in prior periods, which represents the extent to which the carrying value exceeded its estimated fair value at the current period end.

Added

The increase in the provision for loss sharing, net primarily reflects larger specific loan impairment reserves taken in 2026, compared to 2025.

Added

The increase in the provision for credit losses, net primarily reflects larger specific loan impairment reserves taken in 2026, in addition to a softer outlook for commercial real estate in 2026, compared to 2025.

Added

Gain (Loss) on Real Estate

Added

The gain on real estate in 2026 represents an aggregate gain recognized on the sale of two foreclosed properties, partially offset by an aggregate loss recognized on the sale of three existing REO assets; while the loss on real estate in 2025 is substantially comprised of losses on below market debt totaling $1.5 million related to financing on the sale of several REO assets.

Added

Income from Equity Affiliates

Added

Income from equity affiliates in 2026 primarily reflects $3.0 million of income recognized related to a cash distribution received from our Lexford joint venture, partially offset by losses from other investments; while income from equity affiliates in 2025 primarily reflects a $3.4 million distribution received from our Lexford joint venture, partially offset by a $1.0 million loss from our AMAC III investment.

Added

Provision for Income Taxes

Added

In the three months ended June 30, 2026, we recorded a tax provision of $3.2 million, which consisted of a current tax provision of $5.4 million and a deferred tax benefit of $2.2 million. In the three months ended June 30, 2025, we recorded a tax provision of $3.4 million, which consisted of a current tax provision of $5.0 million and a deferred tax benefit of $1.6 million.

Added

Net (Loss) Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest

Added

The noncontrolling interest relates to the outstanding OP Units (see Note 16). At June 30, 2026 and 2025, there were 16,170,218 and 16,173,761 OP Units outstanding, respectively, which represented 7.9% and 7.8%, respectively, of our outstanding stock.

Added

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025

Added

The following table provides our consolidated operating results ($ in thousands):

Added

nm — not meaningful

Added

The following table presents the average balance of our Structured Business interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, associated interest income (expense) and the corresponding weighted average yields ($ in thousands):

Added

(1)Based on UPB for loans, amortized cost for securities and principal amount of debt.

Added

(2)Weighted average yield calculated based on annualized interest income or expense divided by average carrying value.

Added

Net Interest Income

Showing the first 60 of 103 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

ABR insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 8 Form 4 filings (4 insiders, 8 trade dates, 444,001 shares, about $384.4K) and open-market sales in 3 filings (3 insiders, 3 trade dates, 409,385 shares, about $201.5K). Net open-market shares: 34,616 (purchases minus sales); net value about $182.9K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2026-09-15Wachter Kevin
EVP, Asset Finance & Treasury
Shares withheld for tax 9,179$4.59 $42.1K108,285 SEC
2026-09-15Wachter Kevin
EVP, Asset Finance & Treasury
Grant/award 21,786— —117,464 SEC
2026-08-31Green William C
Director
Open-market purchase 16$5.10 $82231,369 SEC
2026-08-31Green William C
Director
Open-market purchase 950$5.09 $4.8K231,353 SEC
2026-08-31Green William C
Director
Open-market purchase 24,985$5.07 $126.7K230,403 SEC
2026-08-05Natalone John
Director, EVP
Open-market sale 375,000— —327,335 SEC
2026-08-05Kaufman Ivan
Director, COB, CEO and President
Open-market purchase 375,000— —375,000 SEC
2026-06-04Tsunis George
Director
Open-market sale 26,700$5.57 $148.7K30,000 SEC
2026-06-04Tsunis George
Director
Open-market purchase 26,700$5.58 $149.0K56,700 SEC
2026-06-01Tsunis George
Director
Open-market purchase 500$5.48 $2.7K2,000 SEC
2026-05-26Tsunis George
Director
Open-market purchase 500$5.51 $2.8K1,500 SEC
2026-05-26Tsunis George
Director
Open-market purchase 500$5.50 $2.8K1,500 SEC
2026-05-19Tsunis George
Director
Open-market purchase 3,400$5.86 $19.9K30,000 SEC
2026-05-19Tsunis George
Director
Open-market purchase 100$5.85 $58526,600 SEC
2026-05-14Tsunis George
Director
Open-market purchase 1,000$5.83 $5.8K1,000 SEC
2026-05-14Tsunis George
Director
Open-market purchase 1,510$5.83 $8.8K26,500 SEC
2026-05-11Friedman David Erwin
CCO & Head of Non-Agcy Prod
Open-market purchase 8,840$6.84 $60.5K68,478 SEC
2026-05-11Friedman David Erwin
CCO & Head of Non-Agcy Prod
Open-market sale 7,685$6.87 $52.8K59,638 SEC

Well-known investors holding ABR (13F)

InvestorQuarterSharesReported value% of their 13FChange vs prior quarter
Coatue Management (Philippe Laffont) COM2026-06-304,196,885$22.7M0.05%No change
Leon Cooperman COM2026-06-301,664,739$9.0M0.25%Added 7%
Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) COM2026-06-30398,195$3.1M—Sold out
Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) COM2026-06-30501,016$2.7M0.0%Added 1%
AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) COM2026-06-30376,371$2.0M0.0%Added 92%
D. E. Shaw & Co. COM2026-06-30188,131$1.0M0.0%Reduced 33%
Millennium Management (Israel Englander) COM2026-06-30136,759$741.2K0.0%New position
Two Sigma Investments COM2026-06-3027,100$208.9K—Sold out

13F reports are filed up to 45 days after quarter end and show long U.S. equity positions only; options positions are omitted here.

Coming soon: email alerts when ABR files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.