ACT 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Enact Holdings, Inc. · Nasdaq · Insurance Agents, Brokers & Service · CIK 1823529 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
Largest changes
see in full comparisonOur practice, consistentConsistent with industry practice and SAP applicable to insurance companies,is towe establish loss reserves in our consolidated U.S. GAAP financial statements based on claim rates and severity for loans that servicers have reported to us as being in default, which is typically after the second missed payment.We also establish incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) reserves for estimated losses incurred on loans in default that have not yet been reported to us by servicers.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware shall be the sole and exclusive forum forsee in full comparison(i)mostanyactionsderivativerelatingactiontoortheproceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a duty (including any fiduciary duty) owed by any ofCompany, our current or former directors, officers, stockholders, employees or agents to us or ourstockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim against us or any of our current or former directors, officers, stockholders, employees or agents arising out of or relating to any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) or our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or our amended and restated bylaws (each, as in effect from time to time), or (iv) any action asserting a claim against us or any of our current or former directors, officers, stockholders, employees or agents governed by the internal affairs doctrine of the State of Delaware; provided, however, that, in the event that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware lacks subject matter jurisdiction over any such action or proceeding, the sole and exclusive forum for such action or proceeding shall be another state or federal court located within the State of Delaware, in each such case, unless the Court of Chancery (or such other state or federal court located within the State of Delaware, as applicable) has dismissed a prior action by the same plaintiff asserting the same claims because such court lacked personal jurisdiction over an indispensable party named as a defendant therein.stockholders. Unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States of America shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). This exclusive forum provision does not preclude or reduce the scope of exclusive federal or concurrent jurisdiction for any actions brought under the Securities Act. This exclusive forum provision does not apply to actions arising under the Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Our exclusive forum provision does not relieve us of our duties to comply with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder, and our stockholders are not deemed to have waived our compliance with these laws, rules and regulations.
“We also establish incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) reserves for estimated losses incurred on loans in default that have not yet been reported to us by servicers.”see in full comparison
“There was no U.S. federal income tax-related legislation or administrative guidance issued in 2024 that had a significant impact on our results of operations or financial condition. Effective January 1, 2023, the U.S. federal government enacted the Inflation Reduction Act which, among other things, implemented a 15% corporate alternative minimum tax (“CAMT”) based on adjusted financial statement income and imposed a 1% excise tax on corporate stock repurchases. The enactment of the CAMT did not have a material impact on our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024 or 2023. …”see in full comparison
We are not responsible for Genworth’s indebtedness and we are currently predominately capitalized and funded independently of Genworth. If Genworth is unable to raise sufficient proceeds to satisfy its obligations as they come due, or Genworth were to default on its outstanding indebtedness, or Genworth were to become subject to insolvency or other similar proceedings, we would not expect such events to result directly in an event of default or an insolvency event for us. However, any such event or the risk (or perceived risk) that any such proceedings could involve us, could negatively affect our ratings, our reputation, our business, our liquidity and results ofsee in full comparisonoperations, and could therefore have a negative effect on our ability to repay our own indebtedness, including the $750 million aggregate principal amount Senior Notes due 2029 (the “2029 Notes”), or otherwise could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and prospects.operations.
You should carefully consider the following risks. These risks could materially affect our business, results of operations or financial condition, cause the trading price of our common stock to decline materially or cause our actual results to differ materially from those expected or those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. Statements in this section are based on the Company’s beliefs and opinions regarding matters that could materially adversely affect the Company in the future and are not representations as to whether such matters have or have not occurred previously. These risks are not exclusive, and additional risks to which we are subject include, but are not limited to, the factors mentioned under “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and the risks of our businesses described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,see in full comparison2024.2025.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (52)
You should carefully consider the following risks. These risks could materially affect our business, results of operations or financial condition, cause the trading price of our common stock to decline materially or cause our actual results to differ materially from those expected or those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. Statements in this section are based on the Company’s beliefs and opinions regarding matters that could materially adversely affect the Company in the future and are not representations as to whether such matters have or have not occurred previously. These risks are not exclusive, and additional risks to which we are subject include, but are not limited to, the factors mentioned under “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and the risks of our businesses described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.2025.
•Interest rates and changesChanges in interest rates could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Housing values could also be adversely impacted due to trends that affect the housing and mortgage markets, such as changes in supply or demand for homes, changes in homebuyers’ expectations for potential home price appreciation, increased restrictions or costs for obtaining mortgage credit due to tightened underwriting standards, tax policy, regulatory developments, higher interest rates and customers’ liquidity issues. Recent home price appreciation coupled with high interest rates has placed pressure on housing affordability. The pace of existing single-family home sales remains depressedslow as homeowners are reluctant to sell their house and pay significantly higher mortgage rates for a new one.
Should home values decline, we could experience a higher frequency and severity of defaults. A decline in home values typically makes it more difficult for borrowers to sell or refinance their homes, increasing the likelihood of a default followed by a claim if borrowers experience a job loss or other life events that reduce their incomes or increase their expenses. Declines in home values may also decrease the willingness of borrowers with sufficient resources to make mortgage payments when their mortgage balances exceed the values of their homes. In addition, declining housing values may impact the effectiveness of our loss management programs, eroding the value of mortgage collateral and reducing the likelihood that properties with defaulted mortgages can be sold for an amount sufficient to offset unpaid principal and interest losses. As a result, declines in home values may increase the risk of loss and typically increase the severity of claims we may pay. Any of these events may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The amount of the potential loss depends in part on whether the home of a borrower who defaults on a mortgage can be sold for an amount that will cover the unpaid principal balance, interest and the expenses of the sale. In previous economic slowdowns in the United States, we experienced a pronounced weakness in the housing market, as well as declines in home prices driving high levels of delinquencies. Any of the events outlined above may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our practice, consistentConsistent with industry practice and SAP applicable to insurance companies, is towe establish loss reserves in our consolidated U.S. GAAP financial statements based on claim rates and severity for loans that servicers have reported to us as being in default, which is typically after the second missed payment. We also establish incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) reserves for estimated losses incurred on loans in default that have not yet been reported to us by servicers.
We also establish incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) reserves for estimated losses incurred on loans in default that have not yet been reported to us by servicers.
We employ models to, among other uses, price our mortgage insurance products, calculate reserves, value assets and generate projections used to estimate future pre-tax income, as well as to evaluate risk, determine internal capital requirements and perform stress testing. These models rely on estimates and projections that are inherently uncertain, may use data and/or assumptions that do not adequately reflect recent experience and relevant industry data, and may not operate as intended. The models require accurate data, including financial statements, credit reports or other financial information, andmuch relianceof which comes from third parties. Reliance on inaccurate data could result in unexpected losses, reputational damage or other effects that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. For example, there are proposals to change the credit score landscape including the implementationacceptance of Vantage score in addition to FICO, or the adoption of FICO 10T,10T. changesProposals tolike credit modeling from the GSEs and the elimination of medical debt from credit reporting. These proposalsthis could limit comparability to historical data used in our models and lead to inaccurate results. In addition, if any of our models contain programming or other errors, are ineffective, use data provided by third parties that is incorrect, or if we are unable to obtain relevant data from third parties, our processes could be negatively affected. The models may prove to be less predictive than we expect for a variety of reasons, including economic conditions that develop differently than we forecast, unique conditions for which we do not have good historical comparators, unexpected economic and unemployment conditions that arise, changes in the law or in PMIERs, issues arising in the construction, implementation, interpretation or use of the models or other programs, the use of inaccurate assumptions or use of short-term financial metrics that do not reveal long-term trends. The limitations of our models may be material and could lead us to make wrong or sub-optimal decisions in aspects of our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
There are currently six active mortgage insurers in the United States, including us.us, though additional entrants into the market are possible. Price remains a leading competitive driver. We monitor various competitive, risk and economic factors while seeking to balance both profitability and market share considerations in developing our pricing strategies. We have and may again in the future reduce certain of our rates, which may reduce our premium yield (net premiums earned divided by the average IIF).
One or more of our competitors may seek to capture increased market share by reducing pricing, offering alternative coverage and product options, loosening their underwriting guidelines or relaxing risk management policies, any of which could improve their competitive positions in the industry and negatively impact our ability to achieve our business goals. Specifically, such competitive moves could result in a loss of customers, require us to lower premiums, adopt riskier credit guidelines or implement other changes that could lower our revenues, increase the risk of the loans we insure or increase our expenses. These impacts could also be exacerbated by additional mortgage insurance entrants.
Interest rates and changesChanges in interest rates could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Rising interest rates generally reduce the volume of new mortgage originations and refinances. A decline in the volume of new or refinance mortgage originations would have an adverse effect on our NIW, which may in turn decrease our earned premiums. Higher interest rates can lead to an increase in defaults as borrowers at risk of default will find it harder to qualify for a replacement loan. The significant increases in mortgage rates during 2022 and 2023 caused a decline in the mortgage insurance market, which reduced our NIW. This impact is offset by higher persistency on our existing insured loans since the prevailing market interest rate is above the loan interest rate of the majority of our portfolio. ThisDespite a trend continuedof intodeclining 2024,rates butduring the second half of 2025, future rate changes and the impact on our premium and NIW is difficult to predict.
In addition, interest rate fluctuations could also have an adverse effect on the results of our investment portfolio. In the current periodperiods of elevated interest rates, the market value of our lower yielding instruments has declined,declines, driving substantial unrealized losses in our portfolio. While we intend to hold thesesecurities securitiesin an unrealized loss position until maturity so as to realize their book value, pressure to sell securities in an unrealized loss position could drive realized losses and impact future earnings. This impact is partially offset by higher yields on new securities purchased. During periods of declining market interest rates, the interest we receive on variable interest rate investments decreases. In addition, during those periods, we reinvest the cash we receive as interest or return of principal on our investments in lower-yielding high-grade instruments or in lower-credit investment grade instruments to maintain comparable returns. Issuers of fixed-income securities may also decide to prepay their obligations in order to borrow at lower market rates, which exacerbates the risk that we have to invest the cash proceeds of these securities in lower-yielding or lower-credit investment grade instruments. See “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” for additional information about interest rate risk.
Income from our investment portfolio is a source of cash to support our operations and make claims payments. If we or our investment managers improperly structure our investments to meet those future liabilities or we have unexpected losses, including losses resulting from the forced liquidation of investments before their maturity, we may be unable to meet those obligations. Our investments and investment policies are subject to state insurance laws, which results in our portfolio being predominantly limited to highly rated fixed maturity securities. Despite this, our investment portfolio is subject to credit risks that could lead to realized losses. AsRising interest rates havecan risen, this has ledlead to a significant increase in unrealized losses in our investment portfolio. While we have the intent and ability to hold securities until maturity, changing conditions requiringcould necessitate the sale of thesecertain investmentsinvestments, andtriggering recognitionrealized of losses may occur.losses.
In recent years, the number of non-bank mortgage loan servicers has increased as the mortgage lending and servicing industries have come under increasing regulation and scrutiny. Significant, sustained failures by large servicers or other disruptions in the servicing of mortgage loans may damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business, and subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.scrutiny.
Inadequate staffing levels or significant transfers of business between servicers could lead to disruptions in the servicing of mortgage loans, which in turn may contribute to a rise in delinquencies and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.reserves. High delinquency rates could also strain the resources of servicers, reducing their ability to undertake mitigation efforts that would help limit losses.
Furthermore, we have delegated to the GSEs, which have in turn delegated to most of their servicers, the authority to accept modifications, short sales and deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure on loans we insure. Servicers are required to operate under protocols established by the GSEs in accepting these loss mitigation alternatives. We depend on servicers in making these decisions and mitigating our exposure to losses. In some cases, loss mitigation decisions favorable to the GSEs may not be favorable to us and may increase the incidence of paid claims. Inappropriate delegation protocols or failure of servicers to service in accordance with the protocols may increase the magnitude of our losses and have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.losses. Our delegation of loss mitigation decisions to the GSEs is subject to cancellation, but exercise of our cancellation rights may have an adverse effect on our relationship with the GSEs and customers.
A decline in the volume of Low Down Payment Loan originations would reduce the demand for mortgage insurance and, therefore, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Changes in the methodology by which servicers determine the cancellation dates of mortgage insurance under HOPA, GSE requirements or otherwise, including as a result of changes in law or regulation, GSE rules or guidance, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our persistency rates on primary mortgage insurance were 83%,82%, 85%83% and 80%85% for the years ended December 31, 2024,2025, 20232024 and 2022,2023, respectively. Elevated persistency insince 2022 through 2024 washas primarily been a result of the higher interest rate environment in response to inflationary pressures. A decrease in persistency generally would reduce the amount of our IIF and couldearned havepremium, a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. However,while higher persistency on certain higher risk products could havelead ato material adverse effect ifincreased claims generated by such products increase.
A decline in the volume of Low Down Payment Loan originations, changes in the methodology by which servicers determine the cancellation dates of mortgage insurance under HOPA, and changes in persistency could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We retain confidential customer information, proprietary information and other data in our information systems, and our information systems may be vulnerable to cybersecurity incidents, such as attacks by malicious actors or breaches due to human error, malfeasance, the use of artificial intelligence, or other cybersecurity incidents. Such incidents could potentially result in the unauthorized access, disclosure, misappropriation, alteration, or deletion of information in our systems, including personally identifiable information and proprietary business information. In addition, an increasing number of states require that affected parties be notified or other actions be taken (which could involve significant costs to us) if a cybersecurity incident results in the inappropriate disclosure of personally identifiable information. We have experienced occasional, actual or attempted breaches of our cybersecurity, although none of these breaches has had a material effect on our business, operations or reputation as of the date of this Annual Report. Any compromise of the security of our information systems or those of our customers and third-party service providers that results in inappropriate access to, or disclosure of, personally identifiable consumer information could damage our reputation in the marketplace, deter lenders from purchasing our mortgage insurance, subject us to significant civil and criminal liability or regulatory enforcement actions and require us to incur significant technical, legal and other expenses. While the Company carries cyber insurance, it cannot be certain that coverage will be adequate for liabilities actually incurred, that insurance will continue to be available to the Company on economically reasonable terms, or at all, or that any insurer will not deny coverage as to any future claim.
Our insurance operations are subject to a wide variety of laws and regulations and are extensively regulated. State insurance laws regulate most aspects of our U.S. business, and our U.S. domiciled insurance subsidiaries are regulated by the insurance departments of the states in which they are domiciled and licensed. Enact Re is subject to Bermudian law and is regulated by the BMA. Failure to comply with applicable regulations or to obtain or maintain appropriate authorizations or exemptions under any applicable laws could result in restrictions on our ability to conduct business or engage in activities regulated in one or more jurisdictions in which we operate and could subject us to fines, injunctions and other sanctions that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, the nature and extent of regulation could materially change, which may result in additional costs associated with compliance with any such changes, or changes to our operations, either of which may have a material adverse effect on our business.compliance.
InThe addition, theincreased use of risk-based pricing systems by the private mortgage insurance industry that establish premium rates based on more attributes than previously considered may result in increased state and/or federal scrutiny of premium rates. The increased use of algorithms,systems, artificial intelligence and data and analytics in the industry may also lead to additional regulatory scrutiny related to other matters such as discrimination in pricing and underwriting, data privacy and access to insurance.
A substantial legal liability or a significant regulatory action against us could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. It is possible that we could become subject to future investigations, regulatory actions, lawsuits, or enforcement actions, which could cause us to incur legal costs and, if we were found to have violated any laws or regulations, require us to pay fines and damages, result in injunctions and incur other sanctions, perhaps in material amounts. Increased regulatory scrutiny and any resulting investigations or legal proceedings could result in new legal precedents and industry-wide regulations or practices that could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, results of operations and financial condition.practices. We cannot predict the ultimate outcomes of any future investigations, regulatory actions or legal proceedings.
Any of the changes outlined above could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are required by certain states and other regulators to maintain certain RTC ratios and other capital standards. The statutory capital adequacy ratio for our U.S. mortgage insurers is known as the RTC ratio, of which the numerator consists of adjusted RIF and the denominator consists of the sum of (i) statutory surplus and (ii) the statutory contingency reserve. In addition, PMIERs include financial requirements for mortgage insurers to do business with the GSEs under which a mortgage insurer’s “Available Assets” (generally only the most liquid assets of an insurer) must meet or exceed “Minimum Required Assets” (which are based on an insurer’s RIF and are calculated from tables of factors with several risk dimensions and are subject to a floor amount).
If we fail to maintain the required minimum capital level in a state where we write business, we would generally be required to immediately stop writing new business in the state until we re-establish the required level of capital or receive a waiver of the requirement from the state’s insurance regulator, or until we have established an alternative source of underwriting capacity acceptable to the regulator. Should we exceed required RTC levels in the future, we would seek required regulatory and GSE forbearance and approvals or seek approval for the utilization of alternative insurance vehicles. However, there can be no assurance if, and on what terms, such forbearance and approvals may be obtained. Enact Re could suffer similar restrictions if it breaches Bermudian capital requirements.
If further revisions to the Basel III Rules increase the capital requirements of banking organizations with respect to the residential mortgages we insure or do not provide sufficiently favorable treatment for the use of mortgage insurance purchased in respect of a bank’s origination and securitization activities, it could adversely affect the demand for mortgage insurance. In 2013, the U.S. federal banking regulators confirmed the role of mortgage insurance as a component of prudential bank regulation for high loan-to-value mortgages. More recently, in July of 2023, the Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency proposed for comment the Basel III Endgame rule. UnderAs originally proposed, the proposedrule rule,would commercialhave bankseliminated the 50% risk‑based capital benefit for high‑LTV portfolio mortgages with totalprivate assetsmortgage greaterinsurance thanfor banking organizations with $100 billion wouldor nomore longerin receivetotal theassets, 50%which, capitalif relief for high loan-to-value portfolio loans with mortgage insurance. If adopted as proposed, this ruleadopted, could decrease thereduce demand for mortgage insurance. TheSince federalthe Basel III Endgame proposal was issued, U.S. banking regulators arehave currentlysince inwithdrawn that proposal and indicated that the reviewstandard process,will be re-proposed with significant revisions. As a result, the timing, substance, and withultimate the change in Administration on January 20, 2025, the outcome, content and timingimpact of the finalBasel ruleIII areEndgame unclear.on financial institutions, and the mortgage insurance market, remains uncertain.
Genworth continues to beneficially own at least 80% of our common stock. As a result, Genworth controls all matters requiring a stockholder vote, including: the election of directors; mergers, consolidations and acquisitions; the sale of all or substantially all of our assets and other decisions affecting our capital structure; the amendment of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws; and our winding up and dissolution. This concentration of ownership may delay, deter or prevent acts that would be favored by our other stockholders, including a change in control of us.the TheCompany. interests ofAlso, Genworth may notseek alwaysto coincidecause withus to take courses of action that, in its judgment, could enhance its investment in us, but which might involve risks to our interestsother stockholders or thoseadversely ofaffect us or our other stockholders.
Also, Genworth may seek to cause us to take courses of action that, in its judgment, could enhance its investment in us, but which might involve risks to our other stockholders or adversely affect us or our other stockholders. However, any dividends or other capital transactions must be approved by our Independent Capital Committee, which is composed entirely of independent directors. We also have entered into a registration rights agreement with Genworth, which will give Genworth a right, subject to certain conditions, to require us to register the sale of our common stock beneficially owned by Genworth.
So long as Genworth continues to beneficially own more than 50% of our outstanding common stock, Genworth will have certain rights, including the right to nominate the majority of our directors. Certain of these directors may be officers or employees of Genworth or its other subsidiaries. Because of their current or former positions with Genworth or its other subsidiaries, these directors, as well as a number of our officers,directors own amounts of Genworth’s common stock and options to purchase Genworth’s common stock. Ownership interests of our directors or officers in Genworth’s common stock, or service of certain of our directors as officers of Genworth or certain of Genworth’s other subsidiaries, may create,generate, or may create the appearance of, conflicts of interest when such director or officer is faced with a decision that could have different implications for the two companies.
In addition, we have entered into agreements with Genworth and its subsidiaries that provide a framework for our ongoing relationship, including a Master Agreement, a registration rights agreement, a Shared Services Agreement, an intellectual property cross license agreement and a transitional trademark license agreement. Disagreements regarding the rights and obligations of Genworth or certain of Genworth’s other subsidiaries or us under each of these agreements or any renegotiation of their terms could create conflicts of interest for certain of these directors and officers, as well as actual disputes that may be resolved in a manner unfavorable to us and our other stockholders. Interruptions to or problems with services provided under the Shared Services Agreement could result in conflicts between us and Genworth or its other subsidiaries that increase our costs both for the processing of business and the potential remediation of disputes. Although we believe these agreements contain commercially reasonable terms, the terms of these agreements may prove not to be in the best interests of our future stockholders or may contain terms less favorable than those we could obtain from third parties. In addition, certain of our officers negotiating these agreements may appear to have conflicts of interest as a result of their ownership of Genworth’s common stock and holdings of Genworth’s equity awards.stockholders.
Genworth depends on us as a source of liquidity and to create value for its shareholders. Genworth’s strategy includes advancing its aging care growth initiatives and maintaining the self-sustainability of its legacy United States life insurance companies and advancing its aging care growth initiatives.companies. While Genworth has improved its financial position and made significant progress on its strategic priorities in recent years, it cannot be sure it will be able to successfully execute on its strategic growth initiatives and plans to effectively address its business challenges.
Genworth’s challengesstrategic in its long-term care insurance business,challenges, or other financial or operational difficulties, may also be attributed to us by investors and may have an adverse effect on the perception of our common stock as an investment. Additionally, any downgrade or negative outlook of Genworth’s ratings may negatively impact our ratings by certain ratings agencies whose rating protocols and group rating methodologies require adverse ratings actions in cases of parent or sister company rating downgrades or adverse rating actions. See “—Adverse rating agency actions may result in a loss of business and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.”
We are not responsible for Genworth’s indebtedness and we are currently predominately capitalized and funded independently of Genworth. If Genworth is unable to raise sufficient proceeds to satisfy its obligations as they come due, or Genworth were to default on its outstanding indebtedness, or Genworth were to become subject to insolvency or other similar proceedings, we would not expect such events to result directly in an event of default or an insolvency event for us. However, any such event or the risk (or perceived risk) that any such proceedings could involve us, could negatively affect our ratings, our reputation, our business, our liquidity and results of operations, and could therefore have a negative effect on our ability to repay our own indebtedness, including the $750 million aggregate principal amount Senior Notes due 2029 (the “2029 Notes”), or otherwise could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and prospects.operations.
As a condition to us remaining a member of the Genworth Consolidated Group, Genworth generally must continue to possess at least 80% of the total voting power and total value of our stock. For these purposes, the term “stock” does not include any stock that (i) is not entitled to vote; (ii) is limited and preferred as to dividends and does not participate in corporate growth to any significant extent; (iii) has redemption and liquidation rights which do not exceed the issue price of such stock (except for a reasonable redemption or liquidation premium) and (iv) is not convertible into another class of stock. Accordingly, while we will have the ability to raise additional capital through certain preferred stock or other means, we will be limited in our ability to raise additional capital by issuing common stock to third parties without leaving Genworth’s consolidated group, which Genworth may not permit. We may also be limited pursuant to restrictions imposed by insurance regulators, GSEs and any limitations under intercompany agreements. This limitation on our ability to raise additional capital through the issuance of common stock could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Genworth’s high ownership percentage risk may also impact our stock price as price volatility may be greater if the public float and trading volume of shares of our common stock are low.
There was no U.S. federal income tax-related legislation or administrative guidance issued in 2024 that had a significant impact on our results of operations or financial condition. Effective January 1, 2023, the U.S. federal government enacted the Inflation Reduction Act which, among other things, implemented a 15% corporate alternative minimum tax (“CAMT”) based on adjusted financial statement income and imposed a 1% excise tax on corporate stock repurchases. The enactment of the CAMT did not have a material impact on our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024 or 2023. Excise tax incurred on our share repurchases is recorded as part of the cost basis of the treasury stock acquired and not reported as part of income tax expense, and it did not have a material impact on our financial position for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
On DecemberJuly 27,4, 2023,2025, the GovernmentOne ofBig Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”), which includes certain tax provisions, was signed into law. Effective January 1, 2025, the Bermuda enacted the Corporate Income Tax Act of 2023 ("“CIT"”). Starting January 1, 2025, the CIT imposed a new 15% corporate income tax on in-scope entities that are resident in Bermuda or that have a Bermuda permanent establishment, without regard to any assurances that had previously been given pursuant to the Exempted Undertakings Tax Protection Act 1966. BecauseThe OBBBA tax enactment did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 and neither did the Bermuda CIT, given that Enact Re is subject to U.S. federal income tax on its income. There was no other U.S. federal income wetax-related dolegislation notor anticipateadministrative thisguidance willissued havein 2025 or 2024 that had a materialsignificant impact on the Company’s financial position orour results of operations.operations or financial condition.
We are a holding company with limited direct business operations. Our primary subsidiaries are insurance companies that own a large majority of our assets and conduct substantially all of our operations. Dividends fromor our subsidiaries andother permitted payments to us under arrangements withfrom our subsidiaries are our principal sources of cash to meet our obligations. These obligations include operating expenses and interest and principal on current and any future borrowings. Our subsidiaries may not be able to, or may not be permitted by regulators to, pay dividends or make distributions to enable us to meet our obligations. Each subsidiary is a distinct legal entity, which may be subject to legallegal, regulatory and contractual restrictions that may also limit our ability to obtain cash from our subsidiaries. If the cash we receive from our subsidiaries pursuant to dividends and other arrangements is insufficient to fund any of these obligations, or if a subsidiary is unable or unwilling to pay future dividends or distributions to us to meet our obligations, we may be required to raise cash through, among other things, incurring debt (including convertible or exchangeable debt), selling assets or issuing equity.
The payment of dividends and other distributions by our insurance subsidiaries is dependent on, among other things, their financial condition and operating performance, corporate law restrictions, insurance laws and regulations and maintaining adequate capital to meet the requirements mandated by PMIERs. In general, dividends and distributions are required to be submitted to an insurer’s domiciliary department of insurance for review. In addition, insuranceInsurance regulators may prohibit the payment of dividends and distributions, or other payments by the insurance subsidiaries (such as a payment under an agreement or for employee or other services, including expense reimbursements) if they determine that such payment could be adverse to policyholders. Accordingly, there can be no assurances that insurance regulators will approve payment of a dividend or distribution or other transfers of assets to us by our insurance subsidiaries.
The design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures andor internal control over financial reporting may not prevent all errors, misstatements or misrepresentations. While management continually reviews the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting,controls, there can be no guarantee that our internal control over financial reportingwe will be effective in fully accomplishing our control objectives. Additionally, in order to comply with new accounting guidance or disclosure requirements from our regulators, we are required to interpret the rules, develop new processes and potentially generate new data, which could expose us to incremental risk. Any material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting or any other failure to maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures could result in material errors or restatements in our historical financial statements or untimely filings, which could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, and a decline in our share price.
Our success is largely dependent on our ability to attract, on-board, retain and motivate qualified employees and senior management. We face intense competition in our industry and local job market for key employees with demonstrated ability, including actuarial, finance, legal, investment, risk, compliance, information technology and other professionals. WeThe cannot be sure we will be ableinability to on-board, attract, retain and motivate the desired workforce, andcould ourresult in failure to domeet soour couldbusiness have a material adverse effect on business, results of operations and financial condition.goals. In addition, we may not be able to meet regulatory requirements relating to required expertise in various professional positions.
Our business is highly dependent upon the effective operation of our computer systems. We also have arrangements in place with our customers and other third-party service providers through which we share and receive information. Despite the implementation of security controls and back-up measures, our computer systems and those of our customers and third-party service providers have been and may be in the future be vulnerable to system failures, physical or electronic intrusions, computer malware or other attacks, programming errors and similar disruptive problems. The failure of these systems for any reason could cause significant interruptions to our operations, which could result in a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.operations.
While it is our goal to safeguard information assets from physical theft and cybersecurity threats, there can be no assurance that our information security will detect and protect information assets from ever-increasing risks. Information assets include both information itself in the form of computer data, written materials, knowledge and supporting processes, and the information technology systems, networks, other electronic devices and storage media used to store, process, retrieve and transmit that information. As more information is used and shared by our employees, customers and suppliers, both within and outside our company, cybersecurity threats become expansive in nature. Further, cybersecurity threats have continued to grow in sophistication, in part through the deployment of artificial intelligence technologies. Although we have implemented controls and continue to train our employees, a cybersecurity event could still occur that would cause damage to our reputation with our customers and other stakeholders and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.stakeholders.
We rely on technologies to provide services to our customers. Customers require us to provide and service our mortgage insurance products in a secure manner. Accordingly, we invest resources in establishing and maintaining electronic connectivity with customers. In addition, if our information technology systems are inferior to our competitors’, existing and potential customers may choose our competitors’ products over ours. Our business would be negatively impacted if we are unable to enhance our platform when necessary to support our primary business functions, including to match or exceed the technological capabilities of our competitors. We cannot predict with certainty the cost of maintaining and improving our platform, but failure to make necessary improvements and any significant shortfall in technology enhancements or negative variance in the timeline in which system enhancements are delivered could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, a natural or man-made disaster or a pandemic could disrupt public and private infrastructure, including our information technology systems. See “—The occurrence of natural or man-made disasters or public health emergencies, including pandemics and disasters caused or exacerbated by climate change, could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.” UnanticipatedThis could also lead to unanticipated problems with, or failures of, our disaster recovery systems and business continuitycontinuity. plansAny of the above factors could have a material adverse impact on our ability to conduct business and on our results of operations and financial condition.
Our future success depends, in part, on our ability to anticipate and respond effectively to the risk of, and the opportunity presented by, digital disruption and other technology change. These may include new applications or insurance-related services based on artificial intelligence, machine learning, robotic process automation, blockchain or new approaches to data mining. In particular, generative artificial intelligence is accelerating the speed at which companies are implementing new technology and process changes. We may be exposed to competitive risks related to the adoption and application of new technologies by established market participants or new entrants. We may not be successful in anticipating or responding to these developments on a timely and cost-effective basis and our ideas may not be accepted in the marketplace. Additionally, the effort to gain technological expertise and develop new technologies in our business requires us to incur significant expenses. Investments in technology systems and data analytics capabilities may not deliver the benefits or perform as expected or may be replaced or become obsolete more quickly than expected, which could result in operational difficulties or additional costs. If we cannot offer new technologies or data analytics solutions as quickly as our competitors, or if our competitors develop more cost-effective technologies, data analytics solutions or other product offerings, we could experience a material adverse effect on our operating results, customer relationships, growth and compliance programs.
Natural or man-made disasters or pandemics or public health emergencies could also disrupt the operations of our counterparties and third-party suppliers or result in increased prices for the products and services they provide to us,us. whichThis could also lead to increased reinsurance rates, less favorable terms and conditions and reduced availability of reinsurance.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware shall be the sole and exclusive forum for (i)most anyactions derivativerelating actionto orthe proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a duty (including any fiduciary duty) owed by any ofCompany, our current or former directors, officers, stockholders, employees or agents to us or our stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim against us or any of our current or former directors, officers, stockholders, employees or agents arising out of or relating to any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) or our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or our amended and restated bylaws (each, as in effect from time to time), or (iv) any action asserting a claim against us or any of our current or former directors, officers, stockholders, employees or agents governed by the internal affairs doctrine of the State of Delaware; provided, however, that, in the event that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware lacks subject matter jurisdiction over any such action or proceeding, the sole and exclusive forum for such action or proceeding shall be another state or federal court located within the State of Delaware, in each such case, unless the Court of Chancery (or such other state or federal court located within the State of Delaware, as applicable) has dismissed a prior action by the same plaintiff asserting the same claims because such court lacked personal jurisdiction over an indispensable party named as a defendant therein.stockholders. Unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States of America shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). This exclusive forum provision does not preclude or reduce the scope of exclusive federal or concurrent jurisdiction for any actions brought under the Securities Act. This exclusive forum provision does not apply to actions arising under the Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Our exclusive forum provision does not relieve us of our duties to comply with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder, and our stockholders are not deemed to have waived our compliance with these laws, rules and regulations.
InWe 2022,typically wereturn announcedcapital theto initiationshareholders ofthrough aour quarterly dividend for our common shareholders as well as the first of our Stock Repurchase Plans that allow forand repurchases of our common stock. OurThis ability to return capital to our shareholders is dependent on our business results and the macroeconomic environment and may be materially and adversely affected by the risk factors discussed herein. Although we anticipate continuing to pay quarterly dividends and repurchase common stock, future dividend payments and share repurchase authorizations are subject to review and approval by our Board of Directors after considering, among other factors, economic and regulatory constraints, current risks to the Company, and subsidiary performance. In addition, future dividend payments or other return of capital to our shareholders are also subject to approval by Genworth, and must be in compliance with the terms of our debt agreements and applicable laws and regulations. Our ability to repurchase stock may also be restricted by our limited public float and relationship with Genworth. See “—Genworth’s continued ownership of at least 80% of our common stock may limit our ability to raise additional capital by issuing common stock to third parties.”
As a result, no assurance can be given that we will be able to continue to payreturn dividendscapital to our shareholders, repurchase our common stock, or return capital through other means,shareholders in the future or that the level of any future return of capital will achieve a market yield or increase or even be maintained over time, any of which could materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
Largest changes
“The credit agreement entered into in connection with the Facility contains customary restrictions on EHI’s ability to pay cash dividends. …”see in full comparison
“Macroeconomic environment. Throughout 2025, the United States economy was subject to significant volatility and uncertainty, largely related to changing economic policies, including new and variable tariffs, continued inflationary pressure, the government shutdown and certain domestic and geopolitical tensions. The ancillary effects of these factors on the domestic and global economies could materially impact the United States housing markets and our business.”see in full comparison
“Inflationary pressures moderated in 2024, with the Bureau of Labor Statistics reporting in December that Consumer Price Index inflation was 2.9% year-over-year. The Federal Reserve took an aggressive approach towards addressing inflation with policy rates reaching a cyclical peak in July 2023. The Federal Open Market Committee began to lower policy rates in September 2024 with additional reductions in November and December 2024. Mortgage rates remain elevated but have declined compared to highs in late 2023.”see in full comparison
“The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported in December 2025 that Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) inflation was 2.7% year-over-year compared to 2.9% year-over-year in December 2024, while the unemployment rate has risen to 4.4% in December 2025 from 4.1% in December 2024. Elevated inflation remains a challenge for the Federal Open Market Committee as it navigates heightened uncertainty.”see in full comparison
“On August 21, 2024, the GSEs and the FHFA released updated PMIERs requirements phasing in a revision to the available assets standards between March 31, 2025, and September 30, 2026. The updated standards differentiate between bonds based on credit quality and liquidity. The updates also establish limits for assets backed by residential mortgages or commercial real estate to mitigate the impact if such assets lose value during periods of housing stress. …”see in full comparison
The revolving credit agreement requires EHI to maintain the following financial covenants: a minimum consolidated net worth equal to the sum of (i)see in full comparison72.5% of EHI’s consolidated net worth as of June 30, 2022 (“the Closing Date”),$3,729,000,000, (ii) 50% ofEHI’s positivecumulative consolidated net income of the Company for each fiscal quarterafterof theClosingCompanyDate(beginning with the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2025) for which consolidated net income is positive, and (iii) 50% of any increase inEHI’sthe consolidated net worthafterof theClosingCompanyDateafter September 30, 2025 resulting fromequitytheissuancesissuance of capital stock by or capital contributions;to, inrespecteach case, the Company or any ofEMICO,itsa minimum total adjusted capital amount equal to 72.5% of EMICO’s total adjusted capital as of the Closing Datesubsidiaries; a maximum debt-to-total capitalization ratio of 0.35 to 1.00; a minimum liquidity level of $25,000,000; and compliance with all applicable financial requirements under the Private Mortgage Insurer Eligibility Requirements published by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Federal National Mortgage Association. For purposes of determining EHI’s compliance with the foregoing financial covenants, the consolidated net worthmetric,metrictotal adjusted capital metric,and debt-to-capitalization ratioand liquidity metric(including, in each case, any component thereof) are each calculated as set forth in the credit agreement.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (80)
We are a leading private mortgage insurance company, having served the United States housing finance market since 1981, and operate in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Our mortgage insurance products provide credit protection to mortgage lenders, covering a portion of the unpaid principal balance of Low Down Payment Loans in the event of a default. Our business objective is to leverage our competitive strengths to drive market share, maintain our strong capitalization and strong earnings profile and deliver attractive risk-adjusted returns to our stockholders. We also offer mortgage-relatedmortgage and credit-related insurance and reinsurance through our other subsidiaries, including our wholly owned Bermuda-based subsidiary, Enact Re.
We also employ a CRT program to transfer a portion of our risk through traditional XOL and quota share reinsurance arrangements and the issuance of ILNs. In exchange, we cede a negotiated amount of our premiums to the reinsurers and ILN investors that participate in our CRT transactions. Our net premiums earned (i.e., materially, the gross premiums charged less premiums ceded as part of our CRT program) represent the largest source of our revenues. Importantly, our CRT program helps to manage risk in our operating model and spread the risk of loss across our counterparties while also providing capital relief.
Pricing is highly competitive in the mortgage insurance industry, with industry participants competing for market share, customer relationships and overall value. Pricing trends have introduced an increasing number of loan, borrower, lender and property attributes, resulting in expanded granularity in pricing regimes in order to better align price and risk. Our proprietary risk-based pricing enginemodel evaluates returns and volatility under both the PMIERsmultiple capital framework and our internal economic capital framework,frameworks, which isare sensitive to economic cycles and current housing market conditions. The model assesses the performance of new business under expected and stress scenarios on an individualized loan basis, which is used to determine pricing and inform our risk selection strategy that optimizes economic value by balancing return and volatility.
The following table presents our NIW, number of cures and new delinquencies for primary policies, excluding our run-off insurance block with reference properties in Mexico,business, for the periods indicated:
Our pricing strategy is designed to charge premium rates commensurate with the underlying risk of each loan we insure. Our proprietary platform provides us with a more flexible, granular and analytical approach to selecting and pricing risk. Using our platform, we can quickly change price to modify our risk selection levels, respond to industry pricing trends or adjust to changing economic conditions. We believe that our platform, powered by our proprietary risk model and our understanding of mortgage risk volatility, provides us with a highly sophisticated pricing regime that improves our risk selection and is designed to yield attractive risk adjusted returns through credit cycles.
Improved analytics, stronger loan origination quality controls and the regulatory developments have resulted in a significant improvement in the credit quality for loans originated in the private mortgage insurance market over time. Additionally, private mortgage insurers and the GSEs have maintained strong credit standards over the past decade, with average FICO scores for NIW persisting at levels significantly above historical averages. As a result, the industry is insuring loans from borrowers who should be better positioned to meet their mortgage obligations.
•legislative, regulatory, FHFA or GSE action, or executive orders permitting or mandating forbearance or a moratorium on foreclosures or evictions due to events such as natural disasters or a pandemic (e.g. COVID-19);
Loss reserves represent the amount needed to provide for the estimated ultimate cost of settling claims relating to insured events that have occurred on or before the end of the respective reporting period. The estimated liability includes requirements for future payments of: (a) losses that have been reported to the insurer; (b) losses related to insured events that have occurred but that have not been reported to the insurer as of the date the liability is estimated; and (c) LAE. Loss adjustment expensesLAE include costs incurred in the claim settlement process such as legal fees and costs to record, process and adjust claims. Consistent with U.S. GAAP and industry accounting practices, we do not establish loss reserves for future claims on insured loans that are not in default or believed to be in default.
The majority of our insurance contracts have recurring monthly premiums. We recognize recurring premiums over the terms of the related insurance policy on a pro-rata basis. Premiums written on single premium policies and annual premium policies are initially deferred as unearned premium reserve and earned over the policy life. A portion of the revenue from single premium policies is recognized in premiums earned in the current period, and the remaining portion isremains deferred as unearned premiums and earned over the estimated expiration of risk of the policy. If single premium policies are cancelled and the premium is non-refundable, then the remaining unearned premium related to each cancelled policy is recognized to earned premiums upon notification of the cancellation. For borrower-paid mortgage insurance, coverage ceases at the earlier of prepayment, or when the original principal is amortized to a 78% loan-to-value ratio in accordance with HOPA. Variation in cancellation rates and projected losses are inputs into our premium recognition models, causing uncertainty within our estimates.
Macroeconomic environment. Throughout 2025, the United States economy was subject to significant volatility and uncertainty, largely related to changing economic policies, including new and variable tariffs, continued inflationary pressure, the government shutdown and certain domestic and geopolitical tensions. The ancillary effects of these factors on the domestic and global economies could materially impact the United States housing markets and our business.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported in December 2025 that Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) inflation was 2.7% year-over-year compared to 2.9% year-over-year in December 2024, while the unemployment rate has risen to 4.4% in December 2025 from 4.1% in December 2024. Elevated inflation remains a challenge for the Federal Open Market Committee as it navigates heightened uncertainty.
Macroeconomic environment. During 2024, the United States economy continued to show positive signs, but faced lingering uncertainty due to inflationary pressure, the geopolitical environment and other macroeconomic concerns.
Inflationary pressures moderated in 2024, with the Bureau of Labor Statistics reporting in December that Consumer Price Index inflation was 2.9% year-over-year. The Federal Reserve took an aggressive approach towards addressing inflation with policy rates reaching a cyclical peak in July 2023. The Federal Open Market Committee began to lower policy rates in September 2024 with additional reductions in November and December 2024. Mortgage rates remain elevated but have declined compared to highs in late 2023.
MortgageThe originationU.S. activitypurchase increasedmortgage modestly in 2024 butoriginations remained relatively slow in response to elevated mortgage rates and sustained low housing supply.rates. Over the past few years, housing affordability has deteriorated as elevated mortgage rates and home price appreciation outpaced median family income according to the National Association of Realtors Housing Affordability Index. NationalAffordability pressures eased slightly during the end of 2025 as mortgage rates began to decline and national house pricesprice continuedgrowth tohas rise in 2024slowed according to the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) Monthly Purchase-Only House Price Index.Index (Seasonally Adjusted).
The unemployment rate was 4.1% as of December 31, 2024, compared to 3.7% in December 2023. As of December 31, 2024, the number of unemployed Americans was approximately 6.9 million and the number of long term unemployed over 26 weeks was approximately 1.6 million.
Forbearance and loss mitigation programs. Borrowers’ ability to utilize extended forbearance timelines permitted through the CARES Act and GSE COVID-19 servicing-related policies ended in 2023. Borrowers that meet general hardship and program guidelines continue to have access to standard forbearance policies as a loss mitigation option. Additionally, in March 2023, the GSEs announced new loss mitigation programs that allow six-month payment deferrals for borrowers facing financial hardship.
Although it is difficult to predict the future level of reported forbearance and how many of the policies in a forbearance plan that remain current on their monthly mortgage payment will go delinquent, servicer-reported forbearances have generally declined. As of December 31, 2024, approximately 1.1%, or 10,943, of our active primary policies were reported in a forbearance plan, of which approximately 34% were reported as delinquent. Approximately 9% of our primary new delinquencies in 2024 were subject to a forbearance plan as compared to 13% in 2023.
In July 2025, the FHFA announced that it will implement the acceptance of VantageScore 4.0 for mortgages delivered to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The GSEs have not yet released implementation details and timelines, and the full impact of this initiative on our business, processes and financial results remains uncertain.
On October 24, 2022, the FHFA announced the validation and approval of both the FICO 10T credit score model and the VantageScore 4.0 credit score model for anticipated use by the GSEs as well as proposing to change the requirement that lenders provide credit reports from all three nationwide consumer reporting agencies and instead only requiring credit reports from two of the three nationwide credit reporting agencies. The validation of the new credit scores is currently expected to require lenders to deliver both credit scores for each loan sold to the GSEs. Implementation, which has been delayed beyond 2025, will require system and process updates along with coordination across stakeholders of the industry.
On August 21, 2024, the GSEs and the FHFA released updated PMIERs requirements phasing in a revision to the available assets standards between March 31, 2025, and September 30, 2026. The updated standards differentiate between bonds based on credit quality and liquidity. The updates also establish limits for assets backed by residential mortgages or commercial real estate to mitigate the impact if such assets lose value during periods of housing stress. We expect to hold capital sufficiency well in excess of these requirements and do not expect the impact of these updates to be material to our sufficiency. The ultimate impact of the PMIERs changes will be influenced by investment portfolio maturities, dispositions, reinvestments, and overall business and economic performance between today and the phase-in dates.
Our portfolio. New insurance written of $51.0$51.5 billion in 20242025 decreasedincreased 4%1% compared to 2023.2024. Changes in NIW are primarily impacted by the size of the mortgage insurance market and our market share. Our primary persistency rate decreased to 83%82% during 20242025 compared to 85%83% during 2023.2024. Persistency remains slightly elevated due to high interest rates but decreased in 20242025 due to rate volatility throughout the year. Elevated persistency hasand continued to offset the decline inmodest new insurance written,written leadinggrowth has led to an increase in primary insurance in-force of $5.9$4.3 billion or 2% since December 31, 2023.2024.
Net earned premiums increased $23 millionmarginally in 20242025 compared to 20232024 as a result of higher average IIF and higher assumed premiums,premiums consistingwere primarily of Enact Re’s GSE credit risk transfer participation and multifamily reinsurance. This was partiallymostly offset by higher ceded premium.premiums and slightly lower average premium rates.
Our largest customer accounted for 12%, 11% and 10% of our total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. This customer also accounted for 20%,22%, 19%20% and 18%19% of our total NIW during the years ended December 31, 2024,2025, 20232024 and 2022,2023, respectively. No other customer accounted for 10% or more of total revenues or NIW for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 or 2023. No customer accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues and no other customer accounted for more than 10% of NIW for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Loss experience. Our loss ratio for the year ended December 31, 2025, was 11% as compared to 4% for the year ended December 31, 2024. Both periods were impacted by favorable reserve adjustments due to strong cure performance and loss mitigation efforts. In 2025, we recorded a net reserve release of $200 million. A majority of the reserve adjustments related to prior period delinquencies but a portion of the release also related to 2025 delinquencies as we reduced the expected claim rates as a result of sustained favorable cure performance and our current market expectations. In 2024, we recorded a reserve release of $252 million, primarily on prior accident year reserves.
Loss experience. Our loss ratio for the year ended December 31, 2024, was 4% as compared to 3% for the year ended December 31, 2023. Both periods were impacted by favorable reserve adjustments. In 2024, we recorded a reserve release of $252 million, primarily on prior accident year reserves as a result of strong cure performance and loss mitigation efforts. As part of the 2024 reserve adjustments, we decreased our claim rate assumptions for new and existing delinquencies as a result of sustained favorable cure performance and lessening uncertainty in the economic environment, which impacted reserves from current and prior accident years. During 2023, we released reserves of $241 million primarily due to better than expected cure experience on delinquencies from 2022 and earlier, including a portion of those related to the emergence of COVID-19.
The severity of loss on loans that go to claim may be negatively impacted by the extended forbearance and foreclosure timelines, the associated elevated expenses and the higher loan amount of the recent new delinquencies. These negative influences on loss severity could be mitigated, in part, by embedded home price appreciation. For loans insured on or after October 1, 2014, our mortgage insurance policies limit the number of months of unpaid interest and associated expenses that are included in the mortgage insurance claim amount to a maximum of 36 months.
New delinquencies in 20242025 increased compared to 20232024 primarily due to the agingnormal ofloss large,development pattern on newer books of business.books. Current period primary delinquencies of 48,53750,481 contributed $287$299 million of loss expense in 2024.2025. We incurred $265$287 million of losses from 41,61748,537 current period delinquencies in 2023.2024. In determining the loss expense estimate, considerations were given to recent cure and claim experience and the prevailing and prospective economic conditions.
The severity of loss on loans that go to claim may be negatively impacted by extended forbearance and foreclosure timelines, the associated elevated expenses and the higher loan amount of the recent new delinquencies. These negative influences on loss severity could be mitigated, in part, by embedded home price appreciation. The majority of our mortgage insurance policies limit the number of months of unpaid interest and associated expenses that are included in the mortgage insurance claim amount to a maximum of 36 months.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had estimated available assets of $5,015 million against $3,096 million net required assets under PMIERs compared to available assets of $5,095 million against $3,043 million net required assets under PMIERs compared to available assets of $5,006 million against $3,119 million net required assets as of December 31, 2023.2024. The sufficiency ratio as of December 31, 2024,2025, was 167%162% or $2,052$1,919 million above the PMIERs requirements, compared to 161%167% or $1,887$2,052 million above the PMIERs requirements as of December 31, 2023.2024. Our PMIERs required assets also benefited from a reinsurance credit of $1,932 million and $1,885 million related to third-party reinsurance as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Our PMIERs required assets as of December 31, 2024, benefited $28 million from the application of a 0.30 multiplier applied to the risk-based required asset amount factor for certain non-performing loans as defined under PMIERs. The application of the 0.30 multiplier to all eligible delinquencies provided $28 million of benefit to our December 31, 2024, PMIERs required assets compared to $73 million of benefit as of December 31, 2023. Our PMIERs required assets also benefited from a reinsurance credit of $1,885 million and $1,714 million related to third-party reinsurance as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. These amounts are gross of any incremental reinsurance benefit from the elimination of the 0.30 multiplier. Per guidance released by the GSEs in the third quarter of 2024, useUse of the multiplier will bewas discontinued effective March 31, 2025.
On January 8, 2024, S&P Global Ratings upgraded the long-term financial strength and issuer credit ratings of EMICO from BBB+ to A-.
Subsequent to year end onOn January 17, 2025, Fitch upgraded the long-term financial strength and issuer credit ratings of EMICO from A- to A.
On August 6, 2025, Moody’s upgraded the insurance financial strength rating of EMICO from A3 to A2.
Recent transactions. In November 2023, we contributed $250 million into Enact Re, our wholly owned Bermuda-based subsidiary. This contribution supported the increase to the ceding percentage of our previously announced affiliate quota share agreements from 7.5% to 12.5% during the first quarter of 2024, and a new quota share reinsurance agreement that cedes 12.5% of EMICO’s 2024 new insurance written. The contribution also supports new business opportunities, which primarily includes the continued execution of GSE credit risk transfer.
On January 3, 2024, we entered into a quota share reinsurance agreement with a panel of third-party reinsurers. Under the agreement, EMICO will cede approximately 21% of a portion of its new insurance written from January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024.
On January 30, 2024, we executed an excess-of-loss reinsurance transaction with a panel of reinsurers, which, following an amendment in December 2024, provides up to $270 million of reinsurance coverage on a portion of current and expected new insurance written for the 2024 book year, effective January 1, 2024.
On May 28, 2024, we issued our 2029 Notes for an aggregate principal amount of $750 million. We used the proceeds from the issuance to redeem our 2025 Notes.
On June 25, 2024, we executed an excess-of-loss reinsurance transaction with a panel of reinsurers, which provides approximately $90 million of reinsurance coverage on a portion of existing mortgage insurance written from July 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023, effective June 1, 2024.
On November 26, 2024, we entered into two quota share reinsurance transactions with a panel of reinsurers. Under the agreements, and subject to certain conditions, EMICO will cede approximately 27% of a portion of expected new insurance written for the period from January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2025, and will cede approximately 27% of a portion of expected new insurance written for the period from January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2026.
SubsequentRecent totransactions. year end, inOn January 24, 2025, we entered into two excess-of-loss reinsurance transactions that cover a portion of expected new insurance written from January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2025, and January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2026, and provide reinsurance coverage of approximately $225 million and $260 million, respectively.
On September 23, 2025, we entered into a quota share reinsurance agreement with a panel of reinsurers. Under the agreement, EMICO will cede approximately 34% of a portion of its expected new insurance written for the period from January 1, 2027, through December 31, 2027.
On September 30, 2025, we entered into a five-year, unsecured revolving credit facility (the “2025 Revolving Credit Facility”) with a syndicate of lenders in the initial aggregate principal amount of $435 million, which replaces the previous $200 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility. The 2025 Revolving Credit Facility may be used for working capital needs and general corporate purposes, including the execution of dividends to our shareholders and capital contributions to our insurance subsidiaries. The 2025 Revolving Credit Facility remains undrawn as of December 31, 2025.
On October 27, 2025, we entered into an excess-of-loss reinsurance transaction that covers a portion of expected new insurance written from January 1, 2027, through December 31, 2027, and provides reinsurance coverage of approximately $170 million.
Capital returns. OnIn April 26, 2022, our Board of Directors approved the initiation of a dividend program under which the Company intends to pay a quarterly cash dividend, subject to approval by our Board of Directors each quarter. We paid quarterly dividends of $0.14 per share in March of 2023 and May, September and December of 2022. We paid quarterly dividends of $0.16 per share inMarch, June, September and December 20232025, andour Marchprimary 2024.mortgage Oninsurance Mayoperating 1,company, 2024,EMICO, paid dividends to EHI that support our ability to return capital to shareholders. We paid a dividend of $0.185 per common share during the first quarter of 2025. In April 2025, we also announced an increase toof our quarterly dividend to $0.185$0.21 per common share which was paid in June, September and December 2024. In November 2024 EMICO completed a distribution to EHI that supports our ability to pay a quarterly dividend.2025. Future dividend payments are subject to quarterly review and approval by our Board of Directors and Genworth and will be targeted to be paid in the third month of each quarter.
On May 1, 2024, we announced the authorization of a share repurchase program that allowsallowed for the repurchase of up to $250 million of EHI’s common stock. UnderThe Company completed the repurchase of shares under this program,authorization in the second quarter of 2025. On April 30, 2025, we announced the authorization of a new share repurchase program that allows for the repurchase of up to an additional $350 million of EHI’s common stock. Under the programs, share repurchases may be made at our discretion from time to time in open market transactions,transactions in compliance with Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, privately negotiated transactions, or by other means, including through Rule 10b5-1 and Rule 10b-18 trading plans. In conjunctionsupport, withEnact this authorization, we havehas entered into an agreement with Genworth Holdings, Inc. to repurchase its EHIEnact shares on a pro rata basis as part of the program. The share repurchase program is not expected to changemaintain Genworth’s ownership interest in Enact post-completion.Enact. We expect the timing and amount of any future share repurchases will be opportunistic and will depend on a variety of factors, including EHI’s share price, capital availability, business and market conditions, regulatory requirements, and debt covenant restrictions. The programprograms doesdo not obligate EHI to acquire any amount of common stock, it may be suspended or terminated at any time at the Company’s discretion without prior notice, and it doesdo not have a specified expiration date.
Subsequent to year end, on February 3, 2026, we announced the authorization of a new share repurchase program that allows for the repurchase of up to an additional $500 million of EHI’s common stock.
Returning capital to shareholders, balanced with our growth and risk management priorities, remains a key commitment as we look to drive shareholder value through time. Future return of capital will be shaped by our capital prioritization frameworkframework, which sets the following priorities: supporting our existing policyholders, growing our mortgage insurance business, funding attractive new business opportunities and returning capital to shareholders. Our total return of capital will also be based on our view of the prevailing and prospective macroeconomic conditions, regulatory landscape and business performance.
Premiums increased mainlymarginally, attributable to higher average IIF and higher assumed premiums, consisting primarily of Enact Re’s GSE credit risk transfer participation and multifamily reinsurance. This was partially offset by higher ceded premium.premiums and slightly lower average premium rates. The net earned premium rate was 3635 basis points, relativelydown consistentslightly withfrom 2023.36 basis points in 2024.
Net investment income increased primarily due to higher investment yields due to elevated interest rates coupled with higher average invested assets.
Net investment losses during 20242025 and 20232024 were primarily driven by realized losses on the sale of fixed maturity securities as part of our yield optimization strategy that allows us to reinvest sales proceeds and recoup higher investment income. Our yield optimization strategy enables opportunistic security sales based on current and changing market conditions. We had morefewer losses on sales in 20242025 than 2023.2024.
Losses incurred in 2025 and 2024 were impacted by favorable reserve adjustments due to strong cure performance and loss mitigation efforts. In 2025, we recorded a net reserve release of $200 million. A majority of the reserve adjustments related to prior period delinquencies but a portion of the release also related to 2025 delinquencies as we reduced the expected claim rates as a result of sustained favorable cure performance and our current market expectations. During 2024, we recorded $252 million of reserve releases.
Losses incurred in 2024 and 2023 were impacted by favorable reserve adjustments. During 2024, we released reserves of $252 million primarily on prior accident year reserves as a result of strong cure performance and loss mitigation efforts. During 2023, we recorded $241 million of reserve releases.
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, increaseddecreased slightly driven primarily attributableby toprudent theexpense impactmanagement coupled with severance expenses as a part of our restructuring initiatives.activities in 2024.
Amortization of DAC and intangibles declined slightly due to lower DAC amortization as a result of elevated persistency, driven by high mortgage rates and lower software amortization.
The expense ratio wasdecreased consistentslightly due to growtha small decrease in and premiumsexpenses and expenses.flat premium growth.
The loss on debt extinguishment relates to the expenses incurred associated with the redemption of our 2025 Notes.Notes in 2024.
Interest expense for 2025 primarily relates to our 20252029 Notes while interest expense for 2024 relates primarily to our 2025 and 2029 Notes. For additional details see Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements.
“Adjusted operating income” is defined as U.S. GAAP net income excluding the effects of (i) net investment gains (losses) and (ii) reorganization or restructuring costs and infrequent or unusual non-operating items.items and (iii) gains (losses) on the extinguishment of debt. .
(i)Net investment gains (losses)—The recognition of realized investment gains or losses can vary significantly across periods as the activity is highly discretionary based on the timing of individual securities sales due to such factors as market opportunities or exposure management. Trends in the profitability of our fundamental operating activities can be more clearly identified without the fluctuations of these realized gains and losses. We do not view them to beas indicative of our fundamental operating activities. Therefore, these items are excluded from our calculation of adjusted operating income.
(ii)RestructuringReorganization or restructuring costs and infrequent or unusual non-operating items are also excluded from adjusted operating income if, in our opinion, they are not indicative of overall operating trends.
(iii)Gains (losses) on the extinguishment of debt are also excluded from adjusted operating income, as theywe aredo not view them as indicative of overall operating trends.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
We have disclosed within Part I, Item 1A in our Annual Report the risk factors that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and/or financial condition. There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed. You should carefully consider the risk factors set forth in the Annual Report and the other information set forth elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. These risk factors and other information may not describe every risk that we face. The occurrence of any additional risks and uncertainties that are currently immaterial or unknown could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and/or financial condition.
No wording changes found in this section.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to six months ended June 30, 2025”
New heading “Losses and expenses”
New heading “Provision for income taxes”
Largest changes
“Six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to six months ended June 30, 2025”see in full comparison
“Losses incurred during the first six months of 2026 and 2025 were both impacted by favorable reserve adjustments. During the first six months of 2026, we released reserves of $76 million primarily on prior accident year reserves driven by cure performance and loss mitigation activities. During the first six months of 2025, we released reserves of $95 million primarily due to better than expected cure performance on delinquencies from 2024 and prior years. New primary delinquencies of 25,858 contributed $145 million of loss expense in the first six months of 2026. …”see in full comparison
Under PMIERs, we are subject to operational and financial requirements that private mortgage insurers must meet in order to remain eligible to insure loans that are purchased by the GSEs. As ofsee in full comparisonMarchJune31,30, 2026, we had estimated available assets of $5,002 million against $3,108 million net required assets under PMIERs compared to available assets of $5,016 million against $3,097 million net required assetsunder PMIERs compared to available assets of $5,015 million against $3,096 million net required assetsas ofDecemberMarch 31,2025.2026. The sufficiency ratio as ofMarchJune31,30, 2026, was162%,161%, or$1,919$1,894 million, above the PMIERs requirements, compared to 162%, or $1,919 million, above the PMIERs requirements as ofDecemberMarch 31,2025.2026. Our PMIERs required assets benefited from a reinsurance credit of$1,944$1,931 million and$1,932$1,944 million related to third-party reinsurance as of June 30, 2026, and March 31, 2026,and December 31, 2025,respectively.
Capital returns.see in full comparisonIn March 2026, our primary mortgage insurance operating company, EMICO, paid a dividend to EHI that supports our ability to return capital to shareholders. We paid a dividend of $0.185 per common share during the first quarter of 2025. In April 2025, we announced an increase of our dividend to $0.21 per common share which was paid quarterly through March 2026.In May 2026, we announced the increase of our quarterly dividend from $0.21 to $0.24 per common share,payablewhich was paid in June 2026. Future dividend payments are subject to quarterly review and approval by our Board of Directors and Genworth and will be targeted to be paid in the third month of each quarter.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (77)
The following discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, and our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, within our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025 (the “Annual Report”).
In addition to historical information, this discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from management’s expectations. Factors that could cause such differences are discussed in the sections entitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” above and Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report. We are not undertaking any obligation to update any forward-looking statements or other statements we may make in the following discussion or elsewhere in this document even though these statements may be affected by events or circumstances occurring after the forward-looking statements or other statements were made.made, except as may be required by any applicable securities law. Future results could differ significantly from the historical results presented in this section. References to “EHI,” “Enact,” “Enact Holdings,” the “Company,” “we” or “our” herein are, unless the context otherwise requires, to EHI on a consolidated basis.
Macroeconomic environment. DuringThrough the firstsecond quarter of 2026, the United States economy continued to be subject to significant volatility and uncertainty, largely related to geopolitical tensions including the Iran conflict, changing economic policies, and continued inflationary pressure. The ancillary effects of these factors on the domestic and global economies could materially impact the United States housing markets and our business.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported in MarchJune 2026 that Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) inflation was 3.3%3.5% year-over-year compared to 2.7%3.3% year-over-year in DecemberMarch 20252026 while the unemployment rate has fallen slightly to 4.2% in June 2026 from 4.3% in March 2026 from 4.4% in December 2025.2026. Elevated inflation remains a challenge for the Federal Open Market Committee as it navigates heightened uncertainty.
U.S. mortgage rates wereremained especiallyelevated volatile duringinto the firstsecond quarter of 2026. Lower rates earlier in the quarter drove higher refinance volume in the market, while the mortgage origination market remained relatively slow, particularly as rates rose later in the quarter. Over the past few years, housing affordability has deteriorated as elevated mortgage rates and home price appreciation outpaced median family income according to the National Association of Realtors Housing Affordability Index. Despite slowing of house price growth nationally in 2026 according to the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) Monthly Purchase-Only House Price Index (Seasonally Adjusted), affordability remains challenged.
In July 2025, the FHFA announced that it willwould implement the acceptance of VantageScore 4.0 for mortgages delivered to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. TheWe GSEsbegan haveaccepting sinceVantageScore released4.0 preliminaryon implementationmortgages details and timelines, butduring the fullsecond impactquarter of this2026, initiativethough on our business, processes and financial resultsvolume remains uncertain.immaterial to date.
Our portfolio. New insurance written (“NIW”) of $12.8$15.2 billion in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 increased 30%15% compared to the firstsecond quarter of 2025. The increase is largelywas driven by larger estimated purchase and refinance volumemortgage insurance markets in the firstsecond quarter. Changes in NIW are primarily impacted by the sizequarter of the mortgage insurance market and our market share.2026. Our primary persistency rate was 80% during the firstsecond quarter of 2026 and 84%82% for the firstsecond quarter of 2025. The persistency rate decreased largely due to lapse, driven by mortgage rate volatility and increased refinance activity.
Net earned premiums decreasedwere modestlyrelatively consistent in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to the firstsecond quarter of 2025 primarily as aslightly resultlower ofaverage premium rates and higher ceded premiums and lapse-driven rate decline partiallywere offset by insurance in-force and assumed premium growth.
Loss experience. Our loss ratio for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, was 15%14% as compared to 12%10% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. Both periods were impacted by favorable reserve development. In the firstsecond quarter of 2026, we released $39$37 million of reserves, driven by cure performance and loss mitigation activities. This compares to the firstsecond quarter of 2025, where we recorded a $47$48 million reserve release driven by cure performance and loss mitigation activities.
New delinquencies in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 increased compared to the firstsecond quarter of 2025 due to the normal loss development pattern on newer books. Current period primary delinquencies of 13,55912,299 contributed $76$68 million of loss expense in the firstsecond quarter of 2026. This compares to $75$69 million of loss expense from 12,23711,567 primary delinquencies that were reported in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. In determining the loss expense estimate, considerations were given to recent cure and claim experience and the prevailing and prospective economic conditions.
Capital requirements and ratings. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, EMICO’s estimated risk-to-capital ratio under North Carolina law and enforced by the North Carolina Department of Insurance (“NCDOI”), EMICO’s domestic insurance regulator, was 10.09.9:1, compared with risk-to-capital ratios of 10.1:1 and 10.510.3:1 as of December 31, 2025, and MarchJune 31,30, 2025, respectively. EMICO’s risk-to-capital ratio remains below the NCDOI’s maximum risk-to-capital ratio of 25:1. North Carolina’s calculation of risk-to-capital excludes the risk in-force for delinquent loans given the established loss reserves against all delinquencies. EMICO’s ongoing risk-to-capital ratio will depend principally on the magnitude of future losses incurred by EMICO, the effectiveness of ongoing loss mitigation activities, new business volume and profitability, the impact of quota share reinsurance, the amount of policy lapses and the amount of additional capital that is generated or distributed by the business.
Under PMIERs, we are subject to operational and financial requirements that private mortgage insurers must meet in order to remain eligible to insure loans that are purchased by the GSEs. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had estimated available assets of $5,002 million against $3,108 million net required assets under PMIERs compared to available assets of $5,016 million against $3,097 million net required assets under PMIERs compared to available assets of $5,015 million against $3,096 million net required assets as of DecemberMarch 31, 2025.2026. The sufficiency ratio as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, was 162%,161%, or $1,919$1,894 million, above the PMIERs requirements, compared to 162%, or $1,919 million, above the PMIERs requirements as of DecemberMarch 31, 2025.2026. Our PMIERs required assets benefited from a reinsurance credit of $1,944$1,931 million and $1,932$1,944 million related to third-party reinsurance as of June 30, 2026, and March 31, 2026, and December 31, 2025, respectively.
Capital returns. In March 2026, our primary mortgage insurance operating company, EMICO, paid a dividend to EHI that supports our ability to return capital to shareholders. We paid a dividend of $0.185 per common share during the first quarter of 2025. In April 2025, we announced an increase of our dividend to $0.21 per common share which was paid quarterly through March 2026. In May 2026, we announced the increase of our quarterly dividend from $0.21 to $0.24 per common share, payablewhich was paid in June 2026. Future dividend payments are subject to quarterly review and approval by our Board of Directors and Genworth and will be targeted to be paid in the third month of each quarter.
On May 1, 2024, we announced the authorization of a share repurchase program that allowed for the repurchase of up to $250 million of EHI’s common stock. The Company completed the repurchase of shares under this authorization in the second quarter of 2025. On April 30, 2025, we announced the authorization of a new share repurchase program that allowed for the repurchase of up to an additional $350 million of EHI’s common stock. The Company completed the repurchase of shares under this authorization during the first quarter of 2026. On February 3, 2026, we announced the authorization of a new share repurchase program that allows for the repurchase of up to an additional $500 million of EHI’s common stock. Under the programs, share repurchases may be made at our discretion from time to time in open market transactions in compliance with Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, privately negotiated transactions, or by other means, including through Rule 10b5-1 trading plans. In support, Enact has entered into an agreement with Genworth Holdings, Inc. to repurchase its Enact shares as part of the program to maintain Genworth’s current ownership interest in Enact. We expect the timing and amount of any future share repurchases will be opportunistic and will depend on a variety of factors, including EHI’s share price, capital availability, business and market conditions, regulatory requirements, and debt covenant restrictions. The programs do not obligate EHI to acquire any amount of common stock, may be suspended or terminated at any time at the Company’s discretion without prior notice, and do not have a specified expiration date.
Three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025
_______________ (1)Loss ratio is calculated by dividing losses incurred by net earned premiums.
Premiums decreasedwere modestlyrelatively consistent for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, as aslightly resultlower ofaverage premium rates and higher ceded premiums and partiallywere offset by insurance in-force and assumed premium growth. The net earned premium rate was 0.34% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, relativelydown consistentslightly withfrom 0.35% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.
Net investment income increased for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, primarily due to higher yields and higher average invested assets.
Net investment losses in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 and 2025 were driven primarily by realized losses on the sale of fixed maturity securities.
Losses incurred during the firstsecond quarter of 2026 and 2025 were both impacted by prior year development. In the firstsecond quarter of 2026, we recorded a reserve release of $39$37 million, driven by cure performance and loss mitigation activities. In the firstsecond quarter of 2025, we recorded a reserve release of $47$48 million primarily related to cure performance of delinquencies and loss mitigation activities. Current period primary delinquencies of 13,55912,299 contributed $76$68 million of loss expense in the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026. This compares to $75$69 million of loss expense from 12,23711,567 primary delinquencies in the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. In 2025, we reduced the expected claim rates as a result of sustained favorable cure performance and our market expectations.
_______________ (1)Excludes other reserves.
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, decreased slightly for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, primarily due to higher ceding commissionscommissions, andpartially loweroffset professionalby serviceshigher employee expenses.
The effective tax rate was 21.4%20.5% and 21.6%21.8% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, consistent with the United States corporate federal income tax rate.
Six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to six months ended June 30, 2025
The following table sets forth our consolidated results for the periods indicated:
(1)Loss ratio is calculated by dividing losses incurred by net earned premiums.
(2)Expense ratio is calculated by dividing acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, plus amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles by net earned premiums.
(3)Net earned premium rate is calculated by dividing direct earned premium less ceded premium, by average primary IIF.
Revenues
Premiums decreased slightly in the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025, as slightly lower average premium rates and higher ceded premiums and were mostly offset by insurance in-force growth and higher assumed premiums. The net earned premium rate was 0.34% for the six months ended June 30, 2026, down slightly from 0.35% for the six months ended June 30, 2025.
Net investment income increased for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025, primarily attributable to an increase in investment yields and higher average invested assets.
Net investment losses in both periods were driven primarily by realized losses on the sale of fixed maturity securities.
Losses and expenses
Losses incurred during the first six months of 2026 and 2025 were both impacted by favorable reserve adjustments. During the first six months of 2026, we released reserves of $76 million primarily on prior accident year reserves driven by cure performance and loss mitigation activities. During the first six months of 2025, we released reserves of $95 million primarily due to better than expected cure performance on delinquencies from 2024 and prior years. New primary delinquencies of 25,858 contributed $145 million of loss expense in the first six months of 2026. This compares to $144 million of loss expense from 23,804 new primary delinquencies in the first six months of 2025. In 2025, we reduced the expected claim rates as a result of sustained favorable cure performance and our market expectations.
The following table shows incurred losses for domestic mortgage insurance related to current and prior accident years for the periods indicated:
(1)Excludes other reserves.
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, decreased slightly driven primarily by higher ceding commissions, partially offset by higher employee expenses.
The expense ratio was flat due to a small decrease in expenses and flat premium growth.
Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, primarily relate to our 2029 Notes. For additional details see Note 7 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Provision for income taxes
The effective tax rate was 20.9% and 21.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, consistent with the United States corporate federal income tax rate.
Adjusted operating income increased for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to MarchJune 31,30, 2025, primarily due to higher net investment income and lower expenses, partially offset by higher losses.
Adjusted operating income increased for the six months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to June 30, 2025, primarily due to higher net investment income and lower expenses, partially offset by higher losses.
_______________ (1)Represents the aggregate unpaid principal balance for loans we insure.
New insurance written (“NIW”)
NIW for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, increased compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, primarily due to larger estimated purchase and refinance mortgage insurance markets in the second quarter of 2026. Similarly, NIW for the six months ended June 30, 2026, increased compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to higher mortgage refinancing originations in the current period.originations.
The following table presents primary NIW by FICOcredit score for the periods indicated:
(1)Loans with unknown FICOcredit scores are included in the 660-679 category.
Beginning in the second quarter of 2026, an immaterial number of loans that use VantageScore 4.0 are included in the table above.
IIF decreased since December 31, 2025, as policy lapse and cancellations outpaced NIW. The primary persistency rate was 80% and 84%82% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. RIF remained relatively flat from December 31, 2025.
The following table sets forth primary IIF by FICO score at origination as of the dates indicated:
(1)Loans with unknown FICO scores are included in the 660-679 category.
The following table sets forth primary RIF by FICO score at origination as of the dates indicated:
(1)Loans with unknown FICO scores are included in the 660-679 category.
The following table sets forth primary IIF by DTIcredit score at origination as of the dates indicated:
(1)Loans with unknown credit scores are included in the 660-679 category.
Beginning in the second quarter of 2026, an immaterial number of loans that use VantageScore 4.0 are included in the table above.
The following table sets forth primary RIF by DTIcredit score at origination as of the dates indicated:
(1)Loans with unknown credit scores are included in the 660-679 category.
Beginning in the second quarter of 2026, an immaterial number of loans that use VantageScore 4.0 are included in the table above.
ACT insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 8 filings (3 insiders, 8 trade dates, 3,784,483 shares, about $172.3M). Net open-market shares: -3,784,483 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$172.3M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | Mcmullen James |
Option exercise | 887 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Mcmullen James |
Shares withheld for tax | 253 | $44.15 | $11.2K |
| 2026-09-30 | Genworth Holdings, Inc. |
Open-market sale | 762,894 | $48.65 | $37.1M |
| 2026-08-31 | Genworth Holdings, Inc. |
Open-market sale | 687,379 | $49.40 | $34.0M |
| 2026-08-17 | Stolove Evan |
Open-market sale | 20,024 | $49.52 | $991.6K |
| 2026-07-31 | Genworth Holdings, Inc. |
Open-market sale | 523,226 | $45.92 | $24.0M |
| 2026-06-30 | Genworth Holdings, Inc. |
Open-market sale | 605,067 | $42.28 | $25.6M |
| 2026-06-01 | Gould Brian |
Open-market sale | 23,000 | $41.18 | $947.1K |
| 2026-05-29 | Genworth Holdings, Inc. |
Open-market sale | 602,440 | $42.91 | $25.9M |
| 2026-04-30 | Genworth Holdings, Inc. |
Open-market sale | 560,453 | $42.55 | $23.8M |
Well-known investors holding ACT (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 275,029 | $12.6M | 0.01% | Reduced 45% |
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 240,381 | $11.0M | 0.0% | Added 5% |
| D. E. Shaw & Co. | 2026-06-30 | 153,547 | $7.0M | 0.0% | Added 94% |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 113,884 | $5.2M | 0.0% | Added 222% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 111,716 | $5.1M | 0.0% | Reduced 5% |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 89,442 | $4.1M | 0.01% | New position |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 11,200 | $457.1K | — | Sold out |