ALTI 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
AlTi Global, Inc. · Nasdaq · Investment Advice · CIK 1838615 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Risks Related to Our Strategic Alternatives Review Process”
New heading “The administration/insolvency of our International Real Estate Businesses could negatively impact our business, and liabilities arising from intercompany balances could adversely affect our financial results.”
New heading “The potential insolvency of other subsidiaries or affiliated entities could materially adversely affect us.”
New heading “The use of new and evolving technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI), in our offerings may result in spending material resources and presents risks and challenges that can impact our business including by posing security and other risks to our confidential information, proprietary information and personal information, and as a result we may be exposed to reputational harm and liability.”
New heading “Risks Related to Our Strategic Alternatives Review Process”
New heading “Our Review of Preliminary Indications of Interest and Potential Strategic Alternatives May Not Result in Any Transaction, and the Announcement or Conduct of Such a Process May Adversely Affect Our Business.”
Largest changes
We are subject to various risks and costs associated with the collection, processing, storage and transmission of personal data and other sensitive and confidential information. Personal data is information that can be used to identify a natural person, including names, photos, email addresses, or computer IP addresses. This data is wide ranging and relates to our clients, employees, counterparties and other third parties. Our compliance obligations include those relating to federal laws and regulations, such as Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) Act and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLBA”) and its implementing regulations, as well as state laws, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”),see in full comparisonwhichand similar privacy and data security laws have been enacted or proposed in numerous other states. These laws provides for enhanced notice and privacyprotections for California residents,rights, a private right of action for databreachesbreaches, and statutory fines and damages for data breaches or other CCPA violations, as well asa requirementrequirements of “reasonable”cybersecurity.cybersecurity, among other requirements. We are also required to comply with foreign data collection and privacy laws in various non-U.S. jurisdictions in which we have offices or conduct business,includingsuch as the European Economic Area (“EEA”) and the United Kingdom (“UK”). The collection, use, disclosure, transfer, or other processing of personal data regarding individuals in the European Economic Area or EEA and the UK is subject to the EU General Data ProtectionRegulationRegulation,(or EU GDPR, with respect to the EEA, and the UK General Data Protection Regulation, or UK GDPR, with respect to the UK, and collectively with the EU GDPR referred to as the “GDPR”),whichin this report unless specified otherwise. The GDPR applies to all organizations processing or holding personal data ofEUEEA and/or UK data subjects (regardless of the organization’s location) as well as to organizations outsidethetheseEUjurisdictions that offer goods or services in theEU,EEA and UK, or that monitor the behavior ofEUEEA and/or UK data subjects. Compliance with the GDPR requires us to analyze and evaluate how we handle data in the ordinary course of business, from processes to technology.EUThe GDPR imposes extensive obligations on organizations that process personal data, including requirements relating to lawful bases for processing, transparency, consent where required, security safeguards, data processing agreements, data subject rights, breach notification, record-keeping, data protection impact assessments and, in some cases, appointment of a data protection officer. It also restricts transfers of personal data outside the EEA and UK (including to the US). Breaches can result in significant penalties (up to €20 million / £17.5 million or 4% of global annual turnover, whichever is higher), and data subjectsneedhave rights tobelodgegiven full disclosure about how their personal data will be usedcomplaints andstored.seekIn that connection, consent must be explicit, and companies must be in a position to delete information from their global systems permanently if consent were withdrawn. Financial regulators and data protection authorities throughout the EU have broad audit and investigatory powers under the GDPR to probe how personal data is being used and processed. In addition, some countries and states are considering or have passed legislation implementing data protection requirements or requiring local storage and processing of data or similar requirements that could increase the cost and complexity of delivering our services.compensation. There are currently a number of proposals pending before federal, state, and foreign legislative and regulatory bodies.
“A growing number of legislators and regulators are adopting laws and regulations and have focused enforcement efforts on the adoption of AI and use of such technologies in compliance with ethical standards and societal expectations. These developments may increase our compliance burden and costs in connection with use of AI and lead to legal liability if we fail to meet evolving legal standards or if use of such technologies results in harms or other causes of action we did not predict. For example, the EU began implementing the Artificial Intelligence Act (the “AI Act”) on August 1, 2024. …”see in full comparison
“Bad actors around the world also use increasingly sophisticated methods, including the use of AI, to engage in illegal activities involving the theft and misuse of personal information, confidential information and intellectual property. In addition, the use of generative AI models in our internal or third-party systems may create new attack surfaces or methods for adversaries, which could impact us and our vendors. …”see in full comparison
“The use of new and evolving technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI), in our offerings may result in spending material resources and presents risks and challenges that can impact our business including by posing security and other risks to our confidential information, proprietary information and personal information, and as a result we may be exposed to reputational harm and liability.”see in full comparison
Despite our efforts to ensure the integrity, confidentiality, availability, and authenticity of our proprietary systems and information, it is possible that we may not be able to anticipate or to implement effective preventive measures against all cyber threats. No security solution, strategy, or measures can address all possible security threats or block all methods of penetrating a network or otherwise perpetrating a security incident. The risk of unauthorized circumvention of our security measures or those of our third-party providers, clients and partners has been heightened by advances in computer and software capabilities and the increasing sophistication of hackers, including those operating on behalf of nation-state actors, who employ complex techniques involving the theft or misuse of personal and financial information, counterfeiting, “phishing” or social engineering incidents, business email compromise, account takeover attacks, denial or degradation of service attacks, malware, fraudulent payment and identity theft. Because the techniques used by hackers change frequently and are increasingly complex and sophisticated, and new technologies may not be identified until they are launched against a target, we and our third-party service providers may be unable to anticipate these techniques or detect an incident, assess its severity or impact, react or appropriately respond in a timely manner or implement adequate preventative measures. Bad actors around the world use increasingly sophisticated methods, including the use of artificial intelligence, to engage in illegal activities involving the theft and misuse of personal information, confidential information and intellectual property. In addition, the use of artificial intelligence (“AI”) based models in our internal or third-party systems may create new attack surfaces or methods for adversaries, which could impact us and our vendors. Any of these effects could damage our reputation, result in the loss of valuable property and information, cause us to breach applicable laws and regulations, and adversely impact our business. Our systemssee in full comparisonaremay also be subject to compromise from internal threats, such as theft, misuse, unauthorized access or other improper actions by employees, service providers and other third parties with otherwise legitimate access to our systems or databases. The latency of a compromise is often measured in months, but could be years, and we may not be able to detect a compromise in a timely manner.
In connection with the products and services that we provide, we collect, use, store, transmit and otherwise process certain confidential, proprietary and sensitive information, including the personal information of end-users, third-party service providers and employees. We rely on the efficient, uninterrupted and secure operation of complex information technology systems and networks to operate our business and securely store, transmit and otherwise process such information. In the normal course of business, we also share information with our service providers and other third parties. We and the third parties we rely upon, like other organizations in our industry, have experienced and expect to continue to experience threats that could cause cybersecurity incidents or data breaches. Such threats are prevalent and continue to rise, are increasingly difficult to detect, and come from a variety of sources. A failure to safeguard the integrity, confidentiality, availability and authenticity of personal information, client data and our proprietary data from cyber-attacks, unauthorized access, fraudulent activity (e.g., check “kiting” or fraud, wire fraud or other dishonest acts), data breaches and other security incidents that we, our third-party service providers or our clients may experience may lead to modification, destruction, loss of availability or theft of critical and sensitive data pertaining to us, our clients or other third parties.see in full comparisonTo date, we have not experienced any material security incidents, but as a financial services company we remain a significant target for malicious third party actions.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (65)
•The administration/insolvency of our International Real Estate Businesses, or any other subsidiaries, could negatively impact our business, and liabilities arising from intercompany balances could adversely affect our financial results.
•As a public company, we are subject to laws, regulations and stock exchange listing standards, which impose additional costs on us and may strain our resources and divert our management’s attention. Additionally, due to our anticipated loss of “emerging growth company status” as of December 31, 2026, these expenses may increase even more.
Risks Related to Our Strategic Alternatives Review Process
•Our review of preliminary indications of interest and potential strategic alternatives may not result in any transaction, and the announcement or conduct of such a process may adversely affect our business.
During periods of difficult market conditions or slowdowns, which may be across one or more industries, sectors or geographies, our investment products and services’ portfolio companies may experience decreased revenues, financial losses, credit rating downgrades, difficulty in obtaining access to financing and increased funding costs. During such periods, those companies may also have difficulty in pursuing growth strategies, expanding their businesses and operations and be unable to meet their debt service obligations or other expenses as they become due, including obligations and expenses payable to our funds. Negative financial results in our investment products and services’ portfolio companies may reduce the net asset valueNAV of our investment products and services, result in the impairment of assets and reduce the investment returns for our investment products and services, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and cash flow or ability to raise additional capital through new or successor investment products and services. In addition, such conditions would increase the risk of default with respect to credit-oriented or debt investments by our investment products and services. Our investment products and services may be adversely affected by reduced opportunities to exit and realize value from their investments, by lower than expected returns on investments made prior to the deterioration of the credit markets and by our inability to find suitable investments for our investment products and services to effectively deploy capital, which could adversely affect our ability to raise new funds and thus adversely impact our prospects for future growth.
Furthermore, although the immediate effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have moderated, it has hadhad, and may continue to have, a potentially long-term negative impact on certain commercial real estate assetsassets, particularly office properties, due to the risk that tenants may continue to reduce the office space they lease as somea portion of the workforce continues to workworks remotely on a hybrid or full time basis. Lower occupancy, rental rates and declining values in our real estate portfolio could have the following negative effects on us:
Over the next 12-months from the time of this filing and the foreseeable future, we believe our cash and cash equivalents are sufficient to meet all of our normal operational and liquidity needs. However, to fund new initiatives and accelerate our growth, we may be required to obtain additional funds. This is because periods of low cash balances, caused by potential mismatches between projected revenue and the timing of receipts, could specifically impact the capital available for expansion and/or business initiative efforts to grow or scale the business.
•our investment products and services’ rates of returns, which are calculated on the basis of net asset valueNAV of the funds’ investments, reflect unrealized gains, which may never be realized;
Many of the investments in our investment products and services are illiquid and thus have no readily ascertainable market prices. We value these investments based on our estimate, or an independent third party’s estimate, of their value as of the date of determination. The determination of fair value, and thus the amount of unrealized appreciation or depreciation our investment products and services may recognize in any reporting period, is to a degree subjective. Our investment products and services generally value their investments quarterly at fair value, based on, among other things, the input of third party valuation firms and taking into account the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments and its earnings, the markets in which the portfolio company operates, comparison to publicly traded companies, discounted cash flow, current market interest rates and other relevant factors. Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private securities, private companies and privately owned real estate, are inherently uncertain, the valuations may fluctuate significantly over short periods of time due to changes in current market conditions. A fund’s net asset valueNAV could be adversely affected if the determinations regarding the fair value of the investments were materially higher than the values that are ultimately realized upon the disposal of such investments. These valuations could, in turn, affect the management fees or performance income that our business receives.
We currently pursue, through our investment products and services, multiple investment strategies. While we believe that there may be certain synergies amongst the various strategies, there can be no assurance that the benefits will manifest or that there will not be unanticipated consequences resulting therefrom. Although we are seeking additional investment strategies, relative to more diversified asset managers, our investment products and services’ limited and specialized focus also leaves us more exposed to risks affecting the sectors in which our investment products and services invest. As our investment management program is not broadly diversified, we may be uniquely exposed to market, tax, regulatory and other risks affecting the sectors in which we invest. There can be no assurance that we will be able to take actions necessary to mitigate the effect of such risks or otherwise diversify our investment program to minimize such exposure.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to take actions necessary to mitigate the effect of such risks or otherwise diversify our investment program to minimize such exposure.
The administration/insolvency of our International Real Estate Businesses could negatively impact our business, and liabilities arising from intercompany balances could adversely affect our financial results.
On July 11, 2025, we placed our International Real Estate Businesses into administration in England and Wales under applicable insolvency laws and appointed the Administrators. The Administrators are officers of the court and, upon their appointment, the directors’ powers were suspended such that the day-to-day operations of these businesses are now under the control of the Administrators. The administration process presents risks and uncertainties that could negatively affect us.
The ultimate costs of the administration/insolvency could exceed our current estimates. In addition, the realization of any remaining assets may be less than anticipated.
The Administrators have broad powers, including with respect to the realization of assets, including intercompany balances owed to the International Real Estate Businesses, and adjudication of claims.
We have historically engaged in transactions with our subsidiaries and affiliated entities, including intercompany funding arrangements and other financial support. The treatment of intercompany balances is subject to applicable insolvency laws, including limitations on contractual or other rights of setoff, and will require negotiated resolution with the Administrators (which may require payments or other consideration from us or our solvent subsidiaries). If a mutually acceptable resolution is not achieved, the Administrators could seek payment of amounts they determine to be due, which could require certain of our affiliated entities to satisfy obligations in cash or otherwise. Any such amounts, and the timing of any required payments, are uncertain and could be material to our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. There can be no assurance that such matters will be resolved on terms favorable to us, or at all.
We may also retain responsibility for certain pre-administration liabilities or other obligations, or face claims related to the historical operations of the International Real Estate Businesses. Any such pre-administration liabilities could be material and could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
The potential insolvency of other subsidiaries or affiliated entities could materially adversely affect us.
If additional subsidiaries or affiliated entities were to become subject to bankruptcy, administration, liquidation or similar insolvency proceedings in any jurisdiction, we could be adversely affected. Although our subsidiaries are separate legal entities, a court, administrator, liquidator or other insolvency official could seek to enforce intercompany arrangements, guarantees, letters of support or other financial commitments, or assert claims against us under applicable law. In certain jurisdictions, local law may permit recourse against shareholders or affiliated entities in circumstances involving undercapitalization, workforce-related liabilities, or other statutory obligations.
In addition, our right to receive any assets of a subsidiary upon its bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization would be junior to the claims of that subsidiary’s creditors, including trade creditors and employees. If any material subsidiary, particularly one that holds significant contracts, licenses or assets, were to enter insolvency proceedings, the resulting disruption, potential loss of value, and related claims could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
Some of our investment products and services generate performance-based fees, including carried interest. Carried interest and performance-based fees or allocations may create an incentive for us or our investment professionals to make more speculative or riskier investments and determinations, directly or indirectly on behalf of our investment products and services, or otherwise take or refrain from taking certain actions thanthat it would otherwise make in the absence of such carried interest or performance-based fees or allocations. It may also create incentives to influence how we establish economic terms for future funds. In addition, we may have an incentive to make exit determinations based on factors that maximize economics in favor of the employees relative to us and our non-participating stockholders. Our failure to appropriately address any actual, potential or perceived conflicts of interest resulting from our entitlement to receive performance income from many of our investment products and services could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, which could materially and adversely affect our business in a number of ways, including limiting our ability to raise additional funds, attract new clients or retain existing clients.
We currently provide or may in the future provide a broad spectrum of financial services, including investment advisory, asset management, capital markets, and idea generation. Because of our size and the variety of investment strategies that we may pursue or we currently pursue, we may face a higher degree of scrutiny compared with investment managers that are smaller or focus on fewer asset classes. In the ordinary course of business, we engage in activities in which our interests or the interests of our clients may conflict with the interests of other clients, including the investors in our funds. Such conflicts of interest could adversely affect one or more of our clients and/or our performance or returns to our investors.
Our clients may invest in companies in which we or one or more orof our other clients also invest, either directly or indirectly. Investments in a company by certain of our clients may be made prior to the investment by other clients, concurrently, including as part of the same financing plan or subsequent to the investments by such other clients. Any such investment by a client may consist of securities or other instruments of a different class or type from those in which other of our clients are invested, and may entitle the holder of such securities and other instruments to greater control or to rights that otherwise differ from those to which such other clients are entitled. In connection with any such investments—including as they relate to acquisition, owning, and disposition of such investments—our clients may have conflicting interests and investment objectives, and any difference in the terms of the securities or other instruments held by such parties may raise additional conflicts of interest for our clients and us. Our failure to adequately mitigate these conflicts could give rise to regulatory and investor scrutiny.
The SEC continues to increase its regulation of the asset management and private equity industries, focusing on the private equity industry’s fees, allocation of expenses to funds, including the allocation of broken-deal expenses, marketing practices, allocation of investment opportunities, disclosures to investors, cybersecurity, data protection, and general conflicts of interest disclosures. The SEC has also heightened its focus on the valuation practices employed by investment advisers. The lack of readily ascertainable market prices for many of the investments made by our clients or the funds in which we invest could subject our valuation policies and processes to increased scrutiny by the SEC. We may be adversely affected as a result of new or revised legislation or regulations imposed by the SEC, other U.S. or foreign governmental regulatory authorities or self-regulatory organizations that supervise the financial markets. Brexit may result in our being subject to new and increased regulations if we can no longer rely on passporting privileges that allow U.K. financial institutions to access the EU single market without restrictions. We also may be adversely affected by changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and rules by these governmental authorities and self-regulatory organizations.
A new EU Regulation on the prudential requirements of investment firms (Regulation (EU) 2019/2033) and its accompanying Directive (Directive (EU) 2019/2034) (together, “IFR/IFD”) went into effect on June 26, 2021. IFR/IFD introduced a bespoke prudential regime for most MiFID investment firms to replace the one that previously applied under the fourth Capital Requirements Directive and the Capital Requirements Regulation. IFR/IFD represents a complete overhaul of “prudential” regulation in the EU. As the application dates for IFR/IFD fall outside the end of the Brexit transition period, the UK is not required to implement the legislation and willhas instead establishestablished a new Investment Firms Prudential Regime that went into effect January 1, 2022, which is intended to achieve similar outcomes to IFD/IFR. There is a risk that the new regime will result in higher regulatory capital requirements for affected firms and new, more onerous remuneration rules, as well as re-cut and extended internal governance, disclosure, reporting, liquidity, and group “prudential” consolidation requirements (among other things), each of which could have a material impact on our European operations, although there are transitional provisions allowing firms to increase their capital to the necessary level over three to five years.
Whether CFIUS has jurisdiction to review an acquisition or investment transaction depends on, among other factors, the nature and structure of the transaction, including the level of beneficial ownership interest and the nature of any information or governance rights involved. For example, investments that result in “control” of a “U.S. business” by a “foreign person” (in each case, as such terms are defined in 31 C.F.R. Part 800) are subject to CFIUS jurisdiction. Significant CFIUS reform legislation, which was fully implemented through regulations that became effective in 2020, expanded the scope of CFIUS’s jurisdiction to investments that do not result in control of a U.S. business by a foreign person, but where they afford certain foreign investors certain information or governance rights in a U.S. business that has a nexus to “critical technologies,” “covered investment critical infrastructure,” and/or “sensitive personal data” (in each case, as such terms are defined in 31 C.F.R. Part 800). The newcurrent U.S. Administration may also seek to expand the scope of regulation on foreign investment through executive orders.
The Business Combination resulted in investments in various U.S. entities by non-U.S. persons that could be considered by CFIUS to result in a covered control transaction that CFIUS would have authority to review. IlWaddi Cayman Holdings is organized in the Cayman Islands and has its principal place of business in Qatar, and its sole ultimate beneficial owner is a Qatar national, and holds approximately 15.0% of our issued and outstanding Common Stock. Global Goldfield Limited is organized in and has a principal place of business in Hong Kong, and its sole ultimate beneficial owner is a Hong Kong national, and holds approximately 8.7%11.9% of our issued and outstanding Common Stock. Several of our directors and executive officers, including each of such persons who is currently a partner and/or officer of AlTi, are also citizens and/or residents of countries other than the United States. While we do not believe that any of the foregoing foreign persons or entities, nor any other foreign person or entity, “controls” us or any of our subsidiaries, CFIUS or another U.S. governmental agency could choose to review any of our past or proposed transactions, including the Business Combination, involving new or existing foreign investors, even if a filing with CFIUS is or was not required at the time of such transaction.
The Dodd-Frank Act authorizes federal regulatory agencies to review and, in certain cases, prohibit compensation arrangements at financial institutions that give employees incentives to engage in conduct deemed to encourage inappropriate risk taking by covered financial institutions. OnInitially proposed on May 16, 2016,2016 and re-proposed on May 6, 2024, the SEC and other federal regulatory agencies proposed a rule that would apply requirements on incentive-based compensation arrangements of “covered financial institutions,” including certain registered investment advisers above a specific asset threshold. This rule, if adopted, could limit our ability to recruit and retain investment professionals and senior management executives. However, the proposed rule remains pending and may be subject to significant modifications. In addition, as directed under the Dodd-Frank Act, on October 26, 2022, the SEC adopted final rules under which companies listed on the NYSE and Nasdaq will be required to adopt “clawback” policies that mandate recovery by companies of certain incentive-based compensation awarded to current and former executives in the event of an accounting restatement. On June 9, 2023, the SEC approved, on an accelerated basis, the NYSE and Nasdaq proposed listing standards implementing the SEC’s Dodd-Frank rules covering the recovery of erroneously awarded compensation and the listing standards became effective on October 2, 2023.
The SEC’s amended rule for investment adviser marketing became effective in November 2022. The rule increases regulatory obligations and potential scrutiny and imposes more prescriptive requirements on investment advisers’ marketing activities, including but not limited to prohibitions on advertisements that are misleading or contain material statements that an investment adviser cannot substantiate as well as requirements for performance advertising and the use of placement agent arrangements. The rule impacts the marketing of certain of our funds and other investment advisory functions. Compliance with the new rule entails compliance and operational costs. In September 2022, the SEC staff published a risk alert indicating that the staff will conduct a number of specific national initiatives, as well as a broad review through the examination process, for compliance with the new marketing rule.
•In October 2023, the SEC adopted amendments to accelerate the filing deadlines for companies to make filings of beneficial ownership and to expand the scope of instances where such a filing is required, and rules to require certain asset managers to file with the SEC on a monthly basis certain data related to their short sales activity. The adopted rules require that we to devote additional resources to fulfilling our beneficial ownership and short-sale reporting obligations and there may be additional regulatory attention focused on such activities.
•In May 2023, the SEC adopted amendments to Form PF (the “Form PF Amendments”) that greatly expand the type, amount, and frequency of information the SEC collects from private fund advisers registered with the SEC. The Form PF Amendments require (i) new “quarterly event” reporting for all private equity fund advisers within 60 days of the end of the fiscal quarter regarding certain trigger events (including adviser-led secondary transactions), (ii) expanded reporting for “large private equity fund advisers,” including reporting on any general partner clawback reporting on any limited partner clawback that is more than 10% of the fund’s capital commitments and additional information on events of default, and (iii) new “current” reporting for “large hedge fund advisers” upon a “trigger event,” including certain extraordinary investments losses that are 20% or more of a fund’s reporting fund aggregate calculated value over a rolling 10 business day period, significant margin and default events, certain operations events with respect to the fund’s critical operations, and events associated with withdrawals and / or redemptions of 50% or more of the fund’s net asset value.NAV. The Form PF Amendments require the adviser to file additional Form PF reports requiring significant quantitative and qualitative analyses. Consequently, certain of our investment adviser entities will have to devote resources and attention to complying with this additional requirement. The Form PF Amendments will impose operational burdens on such subsidiaries as it will have to build or modify systems to gather the information required by the newly adopted reporting regime. This could result in increased compliance and monitoring costs and divert resources away from advancing a fund’s profitability.
•In February 2023, the SEC proposed a significant transformation of the Custody Rule under the Advisers Act into a new Rule 223-1 (the “Safeguarding Rule”) applicable to SEC-registered investment advisers. The proposed Safeguarding Rule would, among other things. On June 12, 2025, the SEC formally withdrew the Safeguarding Rule proposal and indicated that it does not intend to finalize that proposal. However, the SEC has signaled its intention to pursue modernization of the existing Custody Rule (Rule 206(4)-2) through future rulemaking. While the scope and requirements of any future custody rule amendments remain uncertain, they could present significant compliance challenges for investment advisers and may require advisers to modify their custodial arrangements, operational procedures, and compliance programs.
•In February 2023, the SEC proposed a significant transformation of the Custody Rule under the Advisers Act into a new Rule 223-1 (the “Safeguarding Rule”) applicable to SEC-registered investment advisers. The proposed Safeguarding Rule would, among other things:
◦Broaden the rule to cover all client assets (and not just funds and securities), including, among other things, digital assets and real estate interests;
◦Expand the definition of “custody” to include discretionary investment authority for assets regardless of whether or not they are processed or settled on a delivery versus payment (“DVP”) basis (and will subject separately managed accounts with non-DVP assets (e.g., loans and privately offered securities) to surprise examinations);
◦Overhaul the requirements relating to qualified custodians, including that the adviser enter into a written agreement with the custodian with an extensive list of required provisions, particularly that the custodian has “possession or control” of client assets; and ◦Narrow the availability of the exception from the qualified custodian requirement for uncertificated privately-offered securities and physical assets and impose new restrictions where the exception still applies.
If adopted, the Safeguarding Rule would represent another radical change in the regulation of custodial practices under the Advisers Act and, like the existing Custody Rule, would likely present a number of significant and burdensome compliance challenges for investment advisers.
In addition, an amended SEC rule and subsequent guidance would,has, beginning infrom January 2025,2025 prohibitand on, prohibited broker dealers from providing price quotations for certain private debt security offeringssecurities unless information about the issuer of these securities is current and publicly available. This rule couldimpacts our ability to obtain quotations in affected securities for which there is no exemptive or no action relief and may affect our ability to trade in certain private debtsuch securities.
These adopted rules and proposed rules, if adopted, could significantly impact the regulatory landscape applicable to our operations, potentially resulting in increased compliance obligations and associated costs. Additionally, they could affect our business by making it more costly financially or burdensome for us to engage in certain business transactions. However, the outcome and timing of these proposed rules remain uncertain. The recent change in the U.S. Administration may influence the SEC’s regulatory priorities and the ultimate disposition of these proposals. At this time, it is unclear whether these proposed rules will be adopted in their current form, modified, or withdrawn altogether.
We may be subject to increasing scrutiny from our clients with respect to the societal and environmental impact of investments we make, which may adversely impact our ability to retain clients or to grow our client base and assets under management or AUA, and also may cause us to be more likely to invest client capital based on societal and environmental factors instead of investing client capital in the investment opportunities with the highest return potential for a particular level of risk.
In connection with the products and services that we provide, we collect, use, store, transmit and otherwise process certain confidential, proprietary and sensitive information, including the personal information of end-users, third-party service providers and employees. We rely on the efficient, uninterrupted and secure operation of complex information technology systems and networks to operate our business and securely store, transmit and otherwise process such information. In the normal course of business, we also share information with our service providers and other third parties. We and the third parties we rely upon, like other organizations in our industry, have experienced and expect to continue to experience threats that could cause cybersecurity incidents or data breaches. Such threats are prevalent and continue to rise, are increasingly difficult to detect, and come from a variety of sources. A failure to safeguard the integrity, confidentiality, availability and authenticity of personal information, client data and our proprietary data from cyber-attacks, unauthorized access, fraudulent activity (e.g., check “kiting” or fraud, wire fraud or other dishonest acts), data breaches and other security incidents that we, our third-party service providers or our clients may experience may lead to modification, destruction, loss of availability or theft of critical and sensitive data pertaining to us, our clients or other third parties. To date, we have not experienced any material security incidents, but as a financial services company we remain a significant target for malicious third party actions.
Our management and Board actively manage and oversee cybersecurity risks. Our cybersecurity program is designed to protect systems and data, containing preventive and detective controls, and our Board, audit committee and management team will beare regularly briefed on our cybersecurity policies and practices and ongoing efforts to improve security, as well as periodic updates on cybersecurity events. All such protective measures, as well as additional measures that may be required to comply with rapidly evolving data privacy and security standards and protocols imposed by law, regulation, industry standards or contractual obligations, have and will continue to cause us to incur substantial expenses. Failure to timely upgrade or maintain computer systems, software and networks as necessary could also make us or our third-party service providers susceptible to breaches and unauthorized access and misuse. We may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify, investigate or remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures arising from data and cybersecurity risks.
Despite our efforts to ensure the integrity, confidentiality, availability, and authenticity of our proprietary systems and information, it is possible that we may not be able to anticipate or to implement effective preventive measures against all cyber threats. No security solution, strategy, or measures can address all possible security threats or block all methods of penetrating a network or otherwise perpetrating a security incident. The risk of unauthorized circumvention of our security measures or those of our third-party providers, clients and partners has been heightened by advances in computer and software capabilities and the increasing sophistication of hackers, including those operating on behalf of nation-state actors, who employ complex techniques involving the theft or misuse of personal and financial information, counterfeiting, “phishing” or social engineering incidents, business email compromise, account takeover attacks, denial or degradation of service attacks, malware, fraudulent payment and identity theft. Because the techniques used by hackers change frequently and are increasingly complex and sophisticated, and new technologies may not be identified until they are launched against a target, we and our third-party service providers may be unable to anticipate these techniques or detect an incident, assess its severity or impact, react or appropriately respond in a timely manner or implement adequate preventative measures. Bad actors around the world use increasingly sophisticated methods, including the use of artificial intelligence, to engage in illegal activities involving the theft and misuse of personal information, confidential information and intellectual property. In addition, the use of artificial intelligence (“AI”) based models in our internal or third-party systems may create new attack surfaces or methods for adversaries, which could impact us and our vendors. Any of these effects could damage our reputation, result in the loss of valuable property and information, cause us to breach applicable laws and regulations, and adversely impact our business. Our systems aremay also be subject to compromise from internal threats, such as theft, misuse, unauthorized access or other improper actions by employees, service providers and other third parties with otherwise legitimate access to our systems or databases. The latency of a compromise is often measured in months, but could be years, and we may not be able to detect a compromise in a timely manner.
Due to applicable laws and regulations or contractual obligations, we may also be held responsible for any failure or cybersecurity breaches attributed to our third-party service providers as they relate to the information that we share with them. Although we generally have agreements relating to data privacy and security in place with our third-party service providers, they are limited in nature and we cannot guarantee that such agreements will prevent the accidental or unauthorized access to or disclosure, loss, destruction, disablement, corruption or encryption of, use or misuse of or modification of confidential, proprietary or sensitive information, including personal information, or enable us to obtain reimbursement from third-party service providers in the event we should suffer incidents resulting in accidental or unauthorized access to or disclosure, loss, destruction, disablement or encryption of, use or misuse of or modification of confidential, proprietary or sensitive information, including personal information. In addition, because we do not control our third-party service providers and our ability to monitor their data security is limited, we cannot ensure the security measures they take will be sufficient to protect confidential, proprietary or sensitive information (including personal information). Our contracts may not contain limitations of liability, and even where they do, there can be no assurance that limitations of liability in our contracts are sufficient to protect us from liabilities, damages, or claims related to our privacy and data security obligations. Further, although we maintain cyber liability insurance, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities related to any experienced cybersecurity incident or data breach.
We are subject to various risks and costs associated with the collection, processing, storage and transmission of personal data and other sensitive and confidential information. Personal data is information that can be used to identify a natural person, including names, photos, email addresses, or computer IP addresses. This data is wide ranging and relates to our clients, employees, counterparties and other third parties. Our compliance obligations include those relating to federal laws and regulations, such as Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) Act and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLBA”) and its implementing regulations, as well as state laws, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), whichand similar privacy and data security laws have been enacted or proposed in numerous other states. These laws provides for enhanced notice and privacy protections for California residents,rights, a private right of action for data breachesbreaches, and statutory fines and damages for data breaches or other CCPA violations, as well as a requirementrequirements of “reasonable” cybersecurity.cybersecurity, among other requirements. We are also required to comply with foreign data collection and privacy laws in various non-U.S. jurisdictions in which we have offices or conduct business, includingsuch as the European Economic Area (“EEA”) and the United Kingdom (“UK”). The collection, use, disclosure, transfer, or other processing of personal data regarding individuals in the European Economic Area or EEA and the UK is subject to the EU General Data Protection RegulationRegulation, (or EU GDPR, with respect to the EEA, and the UK General Data Protection Regulation, or UK GDPR, with respect to the UK, and collectively with the EU GDPR referred to as the “GDPR”), whichin this report unless specified otherwise. The GDPR applies to all organizations processing or holding personal data of EUEEA and/or UK data subjects (regardless of the organization’s location) as well as to organizations outside thethese EUjurisdictions that offer goods or services in the EU,EEA and UK, or that monitor the behavior of EUEEA and/or UK data subjects. Compliance with the GDPR requires us to analyze and evaluate how we handle data in the ordinary course of business, from processes to technology. EUThe GDPR imposes extensive obligations on organizations that process personal data, including requirements relating to lawful bases for processing, transparency, consent where required, security safeguards, data processing agreements, data subject rights, breach notification, record-keeping, data protection impact assessments and, in some cases, appointment of a data protection officer. It also restricts transfers of personal data outside the EEA and UK (including to the US). Breaches can result in significant penalties (up to €20 million / £17.5 million or 4% of global annual turnover, whichever is higher), and data subjects needhave rights to belodge given full disclosure about how their personal data will be usedcomplaints and stored.seek In that connection, consent must be explicit, and companies must be in a position to delete information from their global systems permanently if consent were withdrawn. Financial regulators and data protection authorities throughout the EU have broad audit and investigatory powers under the GDPR to probe how personal data is being used and processed. In addition, some countries and states are considering or have passed legislation implementing data protection requirements or requiring local storage and processing of data or similar requirements that could increase the cost and complexity of delivering our services.compensation. There are currently a number of proposals pending before federal, state, and foreign legislative and regulatory bodies.
The use of new and evolving technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI), in our offerings may result in spending material resources and presents risks and challenges that can impact our business including by posing security and other risks to our confidential information, proprietary information and personal information, and as a result we may be exposed to reputational harm and liability.
We may use and integrate artificial intelligence (AI) into our business processes both in our own development and implementation of AI and through the adoption of commercially available tools. Use of this technology could pose cybersecurity, data privacy, IT, intellectual property, regulatory, legal, operational, competitive, reputational and other risks and challenges that could affect our business. Specifically, risks related to accuracy, bias, AI hallucinations, discrimination, harmful content, misinformation, fraud, scams, targeted attacks (including model poisoning or data poisoning), surveillance, data leakage, inequality, environmental harms, and other harms may flow from our development, use, or deployment of AI technologies. AI technologies may also introduce novel and evolving attack vectors, including prompt‑injection vulnerabilities, model‑extraction attacks, indirect or hidden prompt manipulation, training‑data contamination, and the generation of hyper‑realistic synthetic content (including “deepfakes”), enabling sophisticated fraud or identity spoofing. These emerging risks may compromise the integrity, confidentiality, availability, or reliability of our systems and may increase exposure to operational disruption, financial loss, and reputational harm. Additionally, the use of certain AI technology can give rise to intellectual property risks, including by disclosing or otherwise compromising our confidential or proprietary intellectual property and intellectual property infringement, or by undermining our ability to assert or defend ownership rights in intellectual property created with the assistance of AI tools.
A growing number of legislators and regulators are adopting laws and regulations and have focused enforcement efforts on the adoption of AI and use of such technologies in compliance with ethical standards and societal expectations. These developments may increase our compliance burden and costs in connection with use of AI and lead to legal liability if we fail to meet evolving legal standards or if use of such technologies results in harms or other causes of action we did not predict. For example, the EU began implementing the Artificial Intelligence Act (the “AI Act”) on August 1, 2024. The AI Act will apply on a phased basis between 2025 and 2027, with most high‑risk system obligations becoming enforceable beginning August 2026, and additional obligations potentially extending into 2027–2028, depending on harmonized standards under the EU’s Digital Omnibus initiative. In the U.S., states have advanced, and in some cases passed, dozens of laws focusing on AI governance and regulation. State legislation is rapidly evolving, with more than 1,200 AI‑related bills introduced in 2025 and significant new laws taking effect in 2026, creating a fragmented and frequently shifting compliance landscape. Federal deregulation efforts have triggered preemption conflicts and legal challenges to state AI laws, creating additional regulatory uncertainty. Regulators, including the SEC, increasingly expect tailored, non‑generic AI risk disclosures, clear definitions of AI use cases, and transparency regarding board oversight and material operational impacts. Companies are also cautioned against ‘AI washing’ – that is, overstating AI capabilities in ways that may mislead investors. If we develop or use AI systems that are governed by these laws or regulations, we will need to meet higher standards of data quality, transparency, and human oversight, and we would need to adhere to specific and potentially burdensome and costly ethical, accountability, and administrative requirements. We may also be subject to significant enforcement or litigation in the event of any perceived non-compliance.
Bad actors around the world also use increasingly sophisticated methods, including the use of AI, to engage in illegal activities involving the theft and misuse of personal information, confidential information and intellectual property. In addition, the use of generative AI models in our internal or third-party systems may create new attack surfaces or methods for adversaries, which could impact us and our vendors. Any of these effects could damage our reputation, result in the loss of valuable property and information, cause us to breach applicable laws and regulations, and adversely impact our business.
In recent years, the volume of claims and amount of damages claimed in litigation and regulatory proceedings against financial advisors and investment managers has been increasing. Our asset management and advisory activities may expose us to the risk of significant legal liabilities to our clients and third parties, including our clients’ stockholders or beneficiaries, under securities or other laws and regulations for, for example, materially false or misleading statements made in connection with securities and other transactions. We make investment decisions on behalf of our clients that could result in substantial losses. Since November 2022, Home REIT and AHRA, which served as its investment advisor until June 30, 2023, have been the subject of allegations regarding Home REIT’s operations, stemming from a report issued by a short seller and Home REIT has seen its financial performance materially decline. AlTi was formed on January 3, 2023 through a business combination transaction that included certain legacy Alvarium companies. Although AHRA was sold prior to the business combination and has never been a subsidiary of AlTi, we were required under GAAP to consolidate its results in our financial statements until June 30, 2023, when it was deconsolidated. HLIF pursues a similar investment strategy to Home REIT and its financial performance has similarly declined significantly since the end of 2021. The historic management of these funds by certain legacy Alvarium companies is now the subject of separate investigations by the UK FCA and, with respect to certain individuals previously affiliated with Home REIT, the UK SFO and, in the case of Home REIT, potential claims are being asserted by its current and former shareholders and, separately, by Home REIT and its directors against certain group entities (AFM UK and ARE). We no longer provide services to Home REIT. Notwithstanding this, we or our subsidiaries may potentially suffer reputational damage from the allegations concerning the historic management of Home REIT or HLIF. Further, we may be subject to the risk of legal and regulatory liabilities or actions alleging breach of regulatory rules and/or principles, negligence, misconduct (including deceit), breach of fiduciary duty or breach of contract. In particular, although the UK FCA’s investigations concerning the historic management of Home REIT and HLIF only commenced in February 2024 and the UK SFO’s investigation of certain individuals previously affiliated with Home REIT became known to us in January 2026, and their outcomes cannot be known or anticipated as at the date of this Annual Report, any financial penalties or other adverse outcomes resulting from these investigations may adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. Similarly, if any litigation or other action is commenced against AFM UK and/or ARE in connection with Home REIT, whilst it is not possible at this point in time for us to reliably assess the quantum of such claims, or AFM UK’s and ARE’s potential exposure, such claims may potentially be material to the Company and, although our intent is for any such claims to be defended, an adverse outcome could have an adverse affect on the business, financial condition or results of operations. These risks often may be difficult to assess or quantify and their existence and magnitude often remain unknown for substantial periods of time. Significant legal expenses may be incurred in defending litigation and responding to regulatory investigations. In addition, negative publicity and press speculation about us, our investment activities or the private markets in general, whether or not based in truth, or litigation or regulatory action against us or any third-party managers recommended by us or involving us may tarnish our reputation and harm our ability to attract and retain clients. Substantial legal or regulatory liability could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations or cause significant reputational harm to us, which could seriously harm our business.
As a public company, we are required to comply with the SEC’s rules implementing Sections 302 and 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which require management to certify financial and other information in our quarterly and annual reports and provide an annual management report on the effectiveness of controls over financial reporting. As an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to formally attest to the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 until the date we are no longer an emerging growth company. We anticipate losing “emerging growth company” status as of December 31, 2026. At such time, our independent registered public accounting firm may issue a report that is adverse in the event that it is not satisfied with the level at which our controls are documented, designed or operating.
We previously identified three material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, primarily stemming from: (1) insufficiently documented risk assessments, (2) insufficiently documented process-level controls, and (3) insufficiently documented information technology controls supporting our financial statements and reporting. Consequently, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer havepreviously determined that our internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of December 31, 2024.] To address these weaknesses, management ishas activelybeen active in implementing remediation plans, including a testing plan to determine the effectiveness of controls that support our financial statements and reporting, the recruitment of additional accounting personnel and the establishment of process-level controls, management review protocols, and documentation policies. These measures aim to ensure the completeness and accuracy of financial statement disclosures and to identify and to mitigate emerging risks. During 2024, management was able to successfulsuccessfully remediate the previously identified material weakness relatedregarding to the lack of sufficientlyinsufficiently documented risk assessments.assessments Whilewith progressadditional has beenenhancements made in management’s report on the remaining material weaknesses, further time is needed to complete the implementation and enhance our internal controlcontrols over financial reporting, including establishment of entity level controls and fraud risk management. Furthermore, during 2025, management was able to successfully remediate the previously identified material weakness regarding insufficiently documented information technology controls supporting our financial statements and reporting. This effort resulted in enhancement of information security general controls across five key information technology segments, which include: change management, computer operations, IT governance, security administration and system development. Additionally, an information technology assessment was completed to remediate four key dependent information technology financial reporting categories, which include: accounts payable, financial reporting, human resources & payroll, and revenue.
While we have made progress in remediating the remaining material weakness, insufficiently documented process-level controls, additional time is required to complete sustainability testing of our internal control over financial reporting during 2026, finalize our remediation efforts, and satisfy the SEC’s rules implementing the Section 404(a) internal control certification requirements. Accordingly, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have determined that our internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures remained ineffective as of December 31, 2025.
As a public company, we are subject to additional laws, regulations and stock exchange listing standards, which will impose additional costs on us and may strain our resources and divert our management’s attention.
As a company with publicly traded securities, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, the listing requirements of Nasdaq and other applicable securities laws and regulations. These rules and regulations require that we adopt additional controls and procedures and disclosure, corporate governance and other practices thereby significantly increasing our legal, financial and other compliance costs. Additionally, due to our anticipated loss of “emerging growth company status” as of December 31, 2026, these expenses may increase even more. These new obligations will also make other aspects of our business more difficult, time-consuming or costly and increase demand on our personnel, systems and other resources. For example, to maintain and improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, we will need to commit significant resources, hire additional staff and provide additional management oversight. Furthermore, as a result of disclosure of information in this Annual Report and in our Exchange Act and other filings required of a public company, our business and financial condition will become more visible, which we believe may give some of our competitors who may not be similarly required to disclose this type of information a competitive advantage. In addition to these added costs and burdens, if we are unable to satisfy our obligations as a public company, we could be subject to delisting of our Class A Common Stock, fines, sanctions, other regulatory actions and civil litigation, any of which could negatively affect the price of our Class A Common Stock.
•pursuant to Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act, it is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities; or
•pursuant to Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Investment Company Act, it owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis.basis (the “40%” Test).
We regard ourselves as a financial services business. We believe that we are engaged primarily in the business of providing financial services and advice and not in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities. We also believe that the primary source of income from each of our businesses is properly characterized as income earned in exchange for the provision of services. We hold ourselves out as a financial services and advisory business and do not propose to engage primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities. Consequently, we do not believe that we or our subsidiaries would be deemed investment companies with an obligation to register as such pursuant to Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act.
As of December 31, 2025, based on their respective asset compositions subject to the 40% Test to determine assets that would or would not be considered investment securities, we do not believe that we or our subsidiaries would be deemed investment companies with an obligation to register as such pursuant to Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Investment Company Act. Our and our subsidiaries’ asset compositions are, however, fluid and may be subject to change in the future.
Risks Related to Our Strategic Alternatives Review Process
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Other income/fees”
New heading “Investments in Alternative Platforms - AUM/AUA”
New heading “Kontora Credit Facility”
New heading “Credit Agreement”
New heading “Kontora Earn-out Consideration”
New heading “Potential Redress in Relation to Real Estate Products”
Removed heading “Wealth & Capital Solutions Income”
Removed heading “International Real Estate Income”
Removed heading “Real Estate Fund Advisory Fees”
Removed heading “Real Estate Co-investment Fees”
Removed heading “Non-Comparability of Predecessor Period”
Removed heading “Wealth & Capital Solutions - AUM”
Removed heading “Wealth & Capital Solutions - AUA”
Removed heading “International Real Estate - AUM/AUA”
Removed heading “* AUA is reported with a one quarter lag for HLIF as management fees are billed on that basis.”
Removed heading “Future Sources and Uses of Liquidity”
Removed heading “AWMS Earn-out Liability”
Largest changes
“We use Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted EBITDA as non-US GAAP financial measures, which do not have uniform definitions. Adjusted EBITDA is derived from and reconciled to, but not equivalent to, its most directly comparable US GAAP measure of net income (loss). …”see in full comparison
“Other income (expenses) for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $113.9 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily due to lower goodwill and impairment charges and higher net unrealized gains on items accounted for at fair value. The prior year period included goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges totaling $206.8 million from the exit and restructuring of certain businesses within the former Asset Management segment. The current year period included goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges totaling $116.8 million.”see in full comparison
“As part of the Company’s strategic review of its Real Estate Businesses, the Company realigned its operating segments which resulted in a change to our reporting units as of September 30, 2024. We determined that triggering events had occurred due to changes in the composition of the our reporting units in addition to declining revenues and increased expenses associated with the Real Estate Businesses. As such, an interim goodwill impairment test of the reporting units was performed prior to their realignment. …”see in full comparison
The Company’s effective tax rate wassee in full comparison10.8%(17.7)% for the year ended December 31,20242025 compared to3.3%16.9% for year ended December 31,2023.2024. The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31,20232025 differed from the statutory U.S. corporate tax rate primarily due to the portion of income allocated to noncontrolling interests, state and local taxes, and the impact of a full valuation allowance on the Company’s deferred tax assets, including those generated in the Company’s subsidiaries in the U.S. and the U.K. and its investment in Umbrella. The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2024 differed from the statutory U.S. corporate tax rate primarily due to the tax impact of mark-to-market losses associated with contingent liabilities, equity consideration in the Business Combination, andgoodwillnondeductibleimpairment.professionalThefeeseffectiveincurredtaxinrateconnectionforwith theyearBusinessended December 31, 2024 differed from the statutory U.S. corporate tax rate generally due to the impact of a valuation allowance with respect to deferred tax assets generated in the Company’s subsidiaries in the U.K. and in the Company’s investment in subsidiary, the portion of income allocated to noncontrolling interests, and goodwill impairment.Combination.
“Other income (expenses) for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $33.0 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. During the year ended December 31, 2025, an impairment loss on intangible assets of $35.0 million was recognized. During the year ended December 31, 2024, an impairment loss on goodwill and intangibles of $74.3 million and higher interest expense of $22.1 million, partially offset by gains on earn-out liabilities of $30.7 million, was recognized.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (169)
AlTi is a global wealth and investment partner to families, foundations and institutions, helping clients activate capital with clarity, bring structure to complexity, and plan with purpose across borders and generations. AlTi combines the breadth of a global firm with the service offering of a family office to deliver solutions designed to meet the full complexity of wealth and capital. We manage or advise approximately $93.1 billion in combined assets as of December 31, 2025. We have approximately 490 professionals operating in 19 cities in 9 countries across three continents as of December 31, 2025. We provide holistic solutions for our wealth management and Outsourced Chief Investment Officer (“OCIO”) clients through an array of services, including discretionary investment management services, non-discretionary investment advisory services, estate and wealth planning, trust and fiduciary, governance and education, philanthropy and purposeful giving, and family office services. We also provide our wealth management clients with access to alternative investment opportunities, including investments in strategies and asset classes to which they would otherwise likely not be able to gain exposure.
Separately, we have one internally managed fund and stakes in three Externally-Managed Funds in our alternatives platform, with a largely institutional client base.
AlTi is a leading independent global wealth manager providing entrepreneurs, multi-generational families, institutions, and emerging next-generation leaders with fiduciary capabilities as well as alternative investment strategies and advisory services. AlTi’s comprehensive offering is underscored by a commitment to impact or values-aligned investing. We manage or advise approximately $75.7 billion in combined assets as of December 31, 2024. Our business is organized into two operating segments - Wealth & Capital Solutions and International Real Estate:
•in our Wealth & Capital Solutions segment, we provide holistic solutions for our wealth management and OCIO clients through a comprehensive array of wealth management services, including discretionary investment management services, non-discretionary investment advisory services, trust services, administration services, and family office services. The segment also reflects the results of our internally managed event-driven strategy and our stakes in three externally managed alternative investment strategies;
•in our International Real Estate segment, we assist our investors with real estate co-investments by providing access to highly differentiated opportunities in these areas as well as structuring and selecting partners with a proven track record in alternative asset classes, with attractive risk adjusted return characteristics.
The current segment composition was introduced as of the third quarter ended September 30, 2024, following the completion of a strategic review of certain businesses within the historically defined Strategic Alternatives segment. Following this strategic review, and consistent with management’s overall view of the core business, it was determined that the businesses reflected in the International Real Estate segment are not additive to our long-term strategy. Several strategic options are currently under consideration, and our objective is to finalize a course of action in the near future.
We operate a global business, with approximately 430 professionals operating in 19 cities in 8 countries across three continents as of December 31, 2024.
Our strategy seeks to enhance our organic growth through acquisitions and integrations of other wealth and investment management businesses in both our existing and new markets. We believe that we are well positioned to capitalize on global market trends and dynamics that we see facing our world as well as the industry, clients, investors, and businesses we serve.
OurThe comprehensive range of servicesCompany generates a diverse array of revenue streams.streams These revenue streamsthat fall broadly into four categories: (i) recurring management, advisory, trustee, or administration fees (“management fees”); (ii) performance or incentive fees; (iii) distributions from investments and (iv) other income or fees:
•Management, advisory, trustee, and administration fees are historically more predictable across market conditions than our other revenue sources. These fees are recurring in nature (usually being annual or quarterly fees) and are earned from investment management, investment advisory, trusts, and family office services. The recurring nature of these fees is underpinned by the client retention rate of wealth management services which means that these fees are also relatively stable.
•Incentive or performance fees are comprised primarily of annual performance or incentive fees which may be earned by providing investment management and advisory as well as fund management activities. It also includes carried interest payments we earn on co-investment. These fees, being performance related, are variable in nature and more susceptible to impact from exogenous factors. As a result, performance and incentive fees provide potential upside to our revenues in the future and, in our view, can be highly accretive to our profitability.
•Distributions from investments are generated from the equity interests we have in three external managers. Distributions from each external manager are recorded upon receipt of the distribution. These distributions are generated through our equity interest in the external manager’s management fees and incentive fees. The management fee component of the distributions is recurring in nature, while the incentive portion, which is performance based, is more susceptible to impact from exogenous factors.
•Other income or fees included transaction fees from businesses we have exited such as strategic advisory, corporate advisory, brokerage, and placement agency services. Transaction fees are generally non-recurring in nature, are typically commission based, and are payable on the successful completion of a transaction.
Wealth & Capital Solutions Income
•Management Fees
Management, advisory, trustee, and administration fees are the Company’s primary source of revenue, and are historically more predictable across market conditions than our other revenue sources. These fees are recurring in nature (usually being annual or quarterly fees) and are earned from investment management, investment advisory, trusts, and family office services. The recurring nature of these fees is underpinned by the client retention rate of wealth management services which means that these fees are also relatively stable.
Investment management or advisory fees are the primary source of revenue in our Wealth & Capital Solutions segment. These fees are generally calculated on the basis of a percentage of the value of each client’s assets (AUM or AUA) and are charged using either an average daily balance or ending balance, quarterly in arrears. Fees from internal fund management and advisory services related to our capital solutions platform are approximately 0.75% to 1.5% of the net asset value of the underlying investments.
Incentive or performance fees are comprised primarily of annual performance or incentive fees which may be earned by providing investment management and advisory as well as fund management activities. It also includes carried interest payments we earn on co-investment. These fees, being performance related, are variable in nature and more susceptible to impact from exogenous factors. As a result, performance and incentive fees provide potential upside to our revenues in the future and, in our view, can be highly accretive to our profitability.
Our internally managed TIG Arbitrage fund is entitled to receive incentive fees from the assets it manages if certain performance returns have been achieved. These incentive fees range from 15% to 20% of net profits. In compliance with ASC 606, we recognize these fees only when it is probable that a significant revenue reversal will not occur. Our incentive fees are not subject to clawback provisions.
Distributions from investments are generated from the equity interests we have in three external managers. Distributions from each external manager are recorded upon receipt of the distribution. These distributions are generated through our equity interest in the external manager’s management fees and incentive fees. The management fee component of the distributions is recurring in nature, while the incentive portion, which is performance based, is more susceptible to impact from exogenous factors. Our economic interests in the External Strategic Managers are as follows:
Distributions from investments are earned through our profit or revenue sharing arrangements with the External Strategic Managers. Our economic interests in the External Strategic Managers are as follows:
•◦Real Estate Bridge Lending Strategy—21% profit share;
•◦European Equities—25% revenue share; and
•◦Asian Credit and Special Situations—12% revenue share
Other income/fees
Other income or fees primarily include transaction fees, which are generally non-recurring in nature, are typically commission based, and are received upon the successful completion of a transaction.
International Real Estate Income
Real Estate Fund Advisory Fees
We earn management fees in our International Real Estate segment through private real estate fund advisory and recurring fees. These fees, governed by an investment advisory agreement, are calculated on a sliding scale based on the fund’s net asset value.
Real Estate Co-investment Fees
As sponsors of private market transactions, we generate income from debt and equity structures, including arrangement, management, advisory, performance, and transaction fees. Arrangement fees range from 50 to 100 basis points of contributed equity. Equity structures typically last three to ten years, with fees between 50 and 175 basis points of committed or drawn equity. Debt structures range from 12 to 36 months. Fees are received monthly, quarterly, or annually.
We may earn a share of performance-related entitlements, such as carried interest, if investor return hurdles (8%-15%) are met. Carried interest typically accounts for 10%-20% of returns exceeding these hurdles. We also receive a share of base management fees from co-investments through advisory or management agreements, extending from investment inception to exit. If we establish feeder vehicles for clients, additional administration and advisory fees may apply.
Our business performance is directly and indirectly influenced by U.S. and to a lesser extent, global financial market and macroeconomic conditions including economic growth, interest rates and inflation. These factors shape market behavior and client decision-making, which in turn impact the demand for our wealth management services and the composition of assets under management.
During the fourth quarter of 2025, global equity markets continued to advance, with major indices ending the year near record or multi‑year highs. In the U.S., performance was positive but more moderate compared to earlier in the year. The S&P 500 returned 2.66%, the Nasdaq Composite gained 2.72%, and international equities outperformed with the MSCI ACWI ex USA rising 5.05% in the quarter. Market leadership, while still concentrated in large‑cap growth and technology names, showed signs of broadening as value‑tilted and international markets strengthened.
The U.S. economic backdrop remained resilient. According to the updated estimate from the Bureau of Economic Analysis, real gross domestic product grew at an annualized rate of 4.4% in the third quarter of 2025, an acceleration from the second quarter’s 3.8% increase. This upward revision reflected stronger consumer spending, exports, government outlays, and investment. Robust household demand, rebounding exports, and easing inventory drags continued to support overall activity.
Inflation remained above the Federal Reserve’s long‑term target but continued to show gradual improvement. The core PCE price index increased 2.8% year‑over‑year in September, and remained at 2.7% in October and 2.8% in November, signaling relatively stable underlying inflation pressures despite tariff‑related price impacts.
Our operations are also affected by movements in interest rates, which influence the value of our clients’ portfolios and, in turn, our revenue. Interest‑rate levels are shaped by Federal Reserve policy decisions aimed at balancing inflation and employment conditions. In December 2025, the Federal Reserve cut the federal funds rate by 25 basis points to a target range of 3.50%–3.75%, marking a third consecutive reduction to close the year. At the subsequent meeting in January 2026, the Federal Reserve left rates unchanged at 3.50%–3.75%, signaling a data‑dependent pause following those late 2025 cuts.
We continue to monitor developments related to these macroeconomic factors and assess their potential impact on both financial markets and our business. A slowdown in inflows or sustained market declines could negatively affect our future results, potentially leading to reduced management fees. At this time, the full impact of these events on financial markets, the broader economy, and our financial statements remains uncertain. For more information, please refer to Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of this Annual Report for previously disclosed risk factors.
Revenues from our Wealth & Capital Solutions and International Real Estate segments are predominantly derived from asset based management, performance or incentive fees; distributions from investments; and other income or fees. Each revenue source is affected by conditions in the financial markets and economic conditions, particularly in the U.S. and to a lesser extent in Europe and Asia. Management fees are generally calculated based on a percentage of the value of billable AUM or AUA (as applicable), while incentive fees are driven by the underlying performance of managed portfolios. In 2024, overall, economic conditions were strong in the US as the U.S. economy seems to have engineered a soft landing; this in combination with strong gains from leading U.S. technology shares on the back of investor enthusiasm around Generative AI led U.S. shares higher, with double digit gains for the second year in a row.
As a wealth and investment business, our clients have had exposure to financial markets, particularly the U.S. market, where our positioning has benefited from the more than 20% gains over the year. Uncertainty has also risen and our positioning for some clients in asset classes such as gold and absolute return hedge strategies have also been additive. Robust credit conditions and strong demand for infrastructure have fuelled solid returns for our private credit and infrastructure focused managers.
In contrast, investors remain cautious on the outlook for fiscal sustainability in the U.S. and this in concert with lingering concerns around the outlook for inflation, particularly in the U.S., led to rising longer dated Government bond yields in 2024. While we are generally under-weighted for clients in duration, Government bonds in general delivered slightly negative returns for the year. Markets outside the U.S. and outside of U.S. large cap also trailed in performance on a relative basis; while we have more limited exposure, these areas were relative headwinds to performance.
Despite the Federal Reserve’s decision to cut interest rates in 2024, the higher cost of capital environment, ongoing increases in construction costs and generally stagnating real estate prices are negatively impacting some of the real estate segments in which we operate. These declines impact the level of management fees that we earn. On the private real estate side within the International Real Estate segment, the more difficult market and interest rate conditions may reduce the ultimate return expected from some of these investments. It is important to note that these assets are utilized in conjunction with longer-term investment strategies and are not subject to daily market pricing.
Non-Comparability of Predecessor Period
Our results for the year ended 2022 reflect only the results of TWMH and do not include the results of the TIG Entities, Alvarium, or Cartesian Growth Capital. Therefore, prior period amounts, related to 2022 are not comparable to the amounts presented for 2024 or 2023. Please see “Results of Operations” and “Reconciliation of Consolidated US GAAP Financial Measures to Certain Non-US GAAP Measures” for a detailed discussion of the underlying drivers of our results, including the accretive impacts of the Business Combination.
We use Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted EBITDA as non-US GAAP financial measures, which do not have uniform definitions. Adjusted EBITDA is derived from and reconciled to, but not equivalent to, its most directly comparable US GAAP measure of net income (loss). Adjusted Net Income represents net income (loss) before taxes adjusted for the components outlined in the following table which presents the non-US GAAP financial measures for the periods indicated:
We use Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted EBITDA as non-US GAAP financial measures, which do not have uniform definitions. Adjusted EBITDA is derived from and reconciled to, but not equivalent to, its most directly comparable US GAAP measure of net income (loss). Adjusted Net Income represents net income (loss) before taxes plus (a) add-back of non-cash expense related to awards of Class A Common Stock (approved post-Business Combination), (b) add-back of non-cash expense related to awards of Class A Common Stock (approved pre-Business Combination), (c) add-back of transaction expenses related to the Business Combination, subsequent acquisitions or divestitures, and issuance of preferred and common stock, including compensation arrangements, legal fees, accounting advisory fees, litigation settlements, and M&A-related audit fees among others, (d) add-back of the change in fair value of the warrant liabilities, (e) add-back of the change in unrealized gains/losses related to Investments held at fair value and includes the non-recurring realized gain for the sale of FOS ($9.4 million) for the year ended December 31, 2024, (f) add-back of the change in fair value of the earnout liabilities, (g) add-back of the change in unrealized gains/losses related primarily to the TRA liability, (h) add-back of cost to implement organization change to derive cost synergy, including consulting fees, severance charges, technology implementation costs, and bad debt expense related to strategic portfolio realignment., (i) add-back of impairment of intangible assets and carried interest/equity method investments, (j) add-back of the impairment of goodwill, (k) add-back of the amortization of the step-up in equity method investments, (l) add-back of reported interest, depreciation, amortization, and tax adjustments of the Company's equity method investments, (m) add-back of the change in fair value of Preferred stock tranche liability. Adjusted EBITDA represents adjusted net income plus (a) interest expense, net, (b) income tax expense, (c) adjusted income tax expense less income tax expense, and (d) depreciation and amortization expense.
We use Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted EBITDA as non-US GAAP measures to track our performance. These non-US GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies and should be considered in addition to and not in lieu of, the results of operations, which are discussed further under “Components of Consolidated Results of Income” and are prepared in accordance with US GAAP. For the specific components and calculations of these non-US GAAP measures, as well as a reconciliation of these measures to the most comparable measure in accordance with US GAAP, see “Reconciliation of Consolidated US GAAP Financial Measures to Certain Non-US GAAP Measures.”
The following table presents the non-US GAAP financial measures for the periods indicated:
(a)Add-back of non-cash expense related to awards of Class A Common stock (approved post-Business Combination).stock.
(b)Add-back of non-cash expense related to awards of Class A Common stock (approved pre-Business Combination).
(cb)Add-back of transaction expenses related to the Business Combination, subsequent acquisitions or divestitures, and issuance of preferred and common stock, including compensation arrangements, legal fees, accounting advisory fees, litigation settlements, andtechnology M&A-relatedimplementations, auditconsultancy feesfees, among others.
(d)Add-back of the change in fair value of the warrant liabilities.
(ec)Add-back of the change in unrealizedfair gains/lossesvalue relatedof to Investmentsinvestments held at fair value and includes the non-recurring realized (gain)/loss foron the sale of FOS ($9.4 million) for the year ended December 31, 2024.sale.
(fd)Add-back of the change in fair value of the earnout liabilities.
(g)Add-back of the change in unrealized gains/losses related primarily to the TRA liability.
(h)Add-back of cost to implement organization change to derive cost synergy, including consulting fees, severance charges, technology implementation costs, and bad debt expense related to strategic portfolio realignment.
(i)Add-back of impairment of intangible assets and carried interest/equity method investments.
(j)Add-back of the impairment of goodwill.
(k)Add-back of the amortization of the step-up in equity method investments.
(l)Add-back of reported interest, depreciation, amortization, and tax adjustments of the Company’s equity method investments.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in the risk factors described in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report.
No wording changes found in this section.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Wealth Management - AUM”
New heading “Wealth Management - AUA”
New heading “Consolidated Results of Operations – For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”
New heading “Other income (expenses)”
Largest changes
“Consolidated Results of Operations – For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”see in full comparison
“Compensation expense. Compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2026 increased by $13.7 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. This increase was primarily due to higher compensation costs tied to acquisition-driven compensation and benefits, acquisition-related earn-outs, new equity grants, and management restructuring expenses.”see in full comparison
Compensation expense. Compensation expense for the three months endedsee in full comparisonMarchJune31,30, 2026increaseddecreased by$15.9$2.1 million compared to the three months endedMarchJune31,30, 2025. Thisincreasewas primarily due tohighera decrease in equity-based compensationcostsexpensetiedassociatedtowithacquisitionpreviouslydrivengrantedcompensation and benefits, acquisition-related earn-outs, new equity grants, management restructuring expenses, and organizational streamlining initiatives that continue to be undertaken in 2026.awards.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (80)
AlTi is a global wealth and investment partner to families, foundations and institutions, helping clients activate capital with clarity, bring structure to complexity, and plan with purpose across borders and generations. AlTi combines the breadth of a global firm with the service offering of a family office to deliver solutions designed to meet the full complexity of wealth and capital. We manage or advise approximately $90.1$96.0 billion in combined assets as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026. We have approximately 490465 professionals operating in 19 cities in 9nine countries across three continents as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026. We provide holistic solutions for our UHNW and institutional clients through an array of services, including discretionary investment management services, non-discretionary investment advisory services, estate and wealth planning, trust and fiduciary, governance and education, philanthropy and purposeful giving, and family office services. We also provide our clients with access to alternative investment opportunities, including investments in strategies and asset classes to which they would otherwise likely not be able to gain exposure.
AlTi operates an open-architecture investment platform, evaluating opportunities across a broad universe of third-party managers and solutions. Investment recommendations are based solely on each client’s objectives, risk profile and circumstances. All investment solutions are subject to a rigorous due diligence and governance framework, and recommendations are made solely on the basis of what we believe is the best outcome for clients.
Separately, we have one internally managed fund and stakes in three Externally-Managed Funds in our alternatives platform, with a largely institutional client base. These are subject to the same due diligence, governance and suitability rules as third-party investment solutions.
Our internally managed TIG Arbitrage fundfund, part of our alternatives platform with a largely institutional client base, is entitled to receive incentive fees from the assets it manages if certain performance returns have been achieved. These incentive fees range from 15% to 20% of net profits. In compliance with ASC 606, we recognize these fees only when it is probable that a significant revenue reversal will not occur. Our incentive fees are not subject to clawback provisions.
Wealth and institutional clients in certain jurisdictions may also pay performance or incentive fees if their portfolio achieves returns in excess of an agreed benchmark or hurdle rate. Typically, such fees are paid annually upon crystallization and are not accrued prior to being earned.
Distributions from investments are generated from the equity interests we have in three external managers.managers, as part of our alternatives platform with a largely institutional client base. Distributions from each external manager are recorded upon receipt of the distribution. These distributions are generated through our equity interest in the external manager’s management fees and incentive fees. The management fee component of the distributions is recurring in nature, while the incentive portion, which is performance based, is more susceptible to impact from exogenous factors. Our economic interests in the External Strategic Managers are as follows:
During the second quarter of 2026, global financial markets experienced a rebound from the elevated volatility that characterized the first quarter of the year. U.S. equity markets recovered as geopolitical tensions and energy-price pressures eased from their earlier peaks, supported by resilient economic growth, strong corporate earnings, and continued interest in investments related to artificial intelligence and other technologies. The S&P 500 increased approximately 18% during the quarter, the Nasdaq Composite advanced approximately 26%, and the MSCI World Index increased approximately 16%.
The U.S. economy demonstrated expansion in the first half of 2026. According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis’ advance estimate released on July 30, 2026, real gross domestic product (“GDP”) increased at an annual rate of 1.5% during the second quarter of 2026, compared with 2.1% during the first quarter. Contributors to second quarter real GDP growth were consumer spending and business investment, which were partially offset by reduced government spending and higher imports.
Inflation remained above the Federal Reserve's long-term 2% target during the second quarter of 2026, with policymakers noting in June that this was due in part to supply shocks that led to price increases in energy and other sectors. The Personal Consumption Expenditures (“PCE”) Price Index increased 3.8%, 4.1% and 3.7% year-over-year in April, May and June 2026, respectively. The core PCE Price Index Excluding Food and Energy increased 3.3%, 3.4% and 3.3% year-over-year in April, May and June 2026, respectively. Although headline and core inflation moderated modestly by quarter end, inflation remained elevated and continued to influence expectations for monetary policy and financial market conditions during the second quarter of 2026.
During the first quarter of 2026, global equity markets were marked by elevated volatility and changing performance patterns across asset classes, following a strong start to the year. Major equity indices reached or approached highs in January, but sentiment deteriorated later in the quarter amid rising geopolitical tensions and higher energy prices. In the U.S., equity markets ended modestly lower, with the S&P 500 declining approximately 4% and the Nasdaq Composite posting similar losses, largely driven by weakness in large-cap technology stocks. In contrast, international and value-oriented markets demonstrated relative resilience, aided by commodity exposure and rotation away from growth, with emerging markets outperforming developed markets during the period.
The U.S. economic backdrop showed signs of deceleration toward the end of 2025. According to the updated estimate from the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the relevant data remains pending.
Inflation remained above the Federal Reserve’s long‑term target and showed renewed persistence early in 2026. The core PCE price index increased 3.1% year‑over‑year in January and moderated slightly to 3% in February, reflecting continued pressure in services inflation despite some easing in goods prices. Energy price increases related to geopolitical disruptions are expected to put additional upward pressure on near‑term inflation readings.
Our operations are also affected by movements in interest rates, which influence the value of our clients’ portfolios and, in turn, our revenue. Following three quarter‑point rate reductions in late 2025, the Federal Reserve held the federal funds rate steady at a target range of 3.50%–3.75% at botheach of its Januarymeetings in the first half of 2026. Policymakers in June 2026 continued to emphasize their commitment to returning inflation to the Federal Reserve’s long-term target, noting that productivity growth and Marchbusiness 2026investment meetings.were Policymakers emphasized a data‑dependent stance, citing heightened inflation uncertainty and geopolitical risks, and signaled a willingness to remain on hold until there is greater clarity on the trajectory of inflationstrong, and economic growth.expansion continued despite elevated uncertainty that it attributed in part to geopolitical tensions.
We continue to monitor developments related to these macroeconomic factors and assess their potential impact on both financial markets and our business. AAs with all businesses of this nature, a slowdown in inflows or sustained market declines could negatively affect our future results, potentially leading to reduced management fees. At this time, the full impact of these events on financial markets, the broader economy, and our financial statements remains uncertain. For more information, please refer to Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report for previously disclosed risk factors.
(c)Add-back of the change in unrealizedfair gains/lossesvalue relatedof to Investmentsinvestments held at fair value.value and non-recurring realized (gain)/loss on sale.
(d)Add-back of the change in fair value of the earnoutearn-out liabilities.
(e)Add-back of the change in unrealized gains/losses related primarily to the TRA liability.
(f)Add-back of cost to implement organization change to derive cost synergy, including consulting fees, severance charges, technology implementation costs, and bad debt expense related to strategic realignment.
(g)Add-back of the change in fair value of Preferred stock tranche liability.
(a)Add-back of non-cash expense related to awards of Class A Common stock (approved post-Business Combination).
(b)Add-back of transaction expenses related to the Business Combination, subsequent acquisitions or divestitures, and issuance of preferred and common stock, including compensation arrangements, legal fees, accounting advisory fees, litigation settlements, technology implementations, consultancy fees, among others.
(c)Add-back of the change in fair value of investments held at fair value and non-recurring realized (gain)/loss on sale.
(d)Add-back of the change in fair value of the earn-out liabilities.
(d)Add-back of the change in fair value of the earnoutearn-out liabilities.
We monitor certain operating metrics that are common to the wealth and asset management industry, as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, which are discussed below.
Wealth Management - AUM
AUM
Wealth Management - AUA
AUA
Within the Alternatives platform, assets consist of assets managed by TIG Arbitrage (AUM $1.8 billion and $1.8 billion as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively), and the External Strategic Managers (AUA $5.3$5.4 billion and $5.5 billion as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively).
The tables below present the change in our total AUM/AUA by strategy and product for our alternatives platform for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and MarchJune 31,30, 2025:
Components of Consolidated Results of IncomeOperations
Revenues
Consolidated Results of Operations – For the Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 Compared to the Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025
Revenue
Management / advisory fees. Management and advisory fees for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, increased by $7.1$5.2 million compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. This increase was driven by higher fees due to increases in our AUM largely attributable to our acquisition of Kontora in Q2the second quarter of 20252025, positive net client flows, and strong portfolio performance. These gains were partially offset by lower management fees in the TIG Arbitrage strategy due to fund outflows.
Incentive fees. For the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, incentive fees decreased by $0.2$0.4 million compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. This decrease is attributable to less fund redemptions resulting in lower crystallized incentive fees in the TIG Arbitrage strategy for the current year as well as fee true-ups occurring in the first quarter, which led to lower crystallized incentive fees in the current period.
Distributions from investments. Distributions from investments for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 increased by $9.1$0.8 million compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. This increase was primarily due to higher distributions related to incentivemanagement fees in the European Equities strategy and partially offset by lower distributions from the Real Estate Bridge Lending Strategy and Asian Credit and Special Situations strategies.Strategy.
Other fees / income. Other fees and income for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was relatively flat compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 with a slight increase of $25.0$0.1 thousandmillion related to higher fees related to one-off arrangements.
Compensation expense. Compensation expense for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 increaseddecreased by $15.9$2.1 million compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. This increase was primarily due to highera decrease in equity-based compensation costsexpense tiedassociated towith acquisitionpreviously drivengranted compensation and benefits, acquisition-related earn-outs, new equity grants, management restructuring expenses, and organizational streamlining initiatives that continue to be undertaken in 2026.awards.
Non-compensation expense. Non-compensation expenses for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 increaseddecreased by $2.4$6.9 million as compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, primarily driven by a $3.3$6.1 million increasedecrease in professional fees resulting from the realization of our expense initiative savings taking hold in the income statement and supported by smaller decreases in the systems, technology, and telephone and general, administrativeadministrative, and other costsfinancial primarilystatement dueline to negative FX adjustments, higher directors’ fees, and other miscellaneous expenses. This was partially offset by lower bad debt expenses when compared to the prior year.items.
Other income for the three months ended June 30, 2026 decreased by $14.6 million compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease was primarily driven by a $24.9 million decline in gain (loss) on investments, the largest component of which was an $18.5 million on our investment in Asian Credit and Special Situations.The unrealized loss reflects a decision by the investment manager to wind down the fund over a 12-month horizon. Separately, and unrelated to the fund investment, the loss on the fair value of our earn-out liabilities decreased by $7.5 million compared to the prior period, partially offsetting the decline, along with other movements in other income.
Other income for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $8.2 million compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025. During the three months ended March 31, 2026, due to the gains on the write-off of third party payables related to the administration of International Real Estate and higher unrealized gains on investments carried at fair value. These were partially offset by lower gains on the fair value of earn-out liabilities and the preferred tranche right liability.
The Company’s effective tax rate was (0.5)%0.2% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to 35.9%15.4% for three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The effective tax rate for the three months ended MarchJune 31, 2025 differed from the statutory U.S. corporate tax rate primarily due to the tax impact of mark-to-market losses associated with contingent liabilities, equity consideration in the Business Combination, and nondeductible professional fees incurred in connection with the Business Combination. The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31,30, 2026 differed from the statutory U.S. corporate tax rate primarily due to the portion of income allocated to noncontrolling interest, state and local taxes, and the impact of a full valuation allowance on many of the Company’s deferred tax assets, including those generated at the Company, in certain of the Company’s U.S. and non-U.S. subsidiaries and its investment in Umbrella. The effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2025 differed from the statutory U.S. corporate tax rate primarily due to the tax impact of mark-to-market losses associated with contingent liabilities, equity consideration in the Business Combination, and nondeductible professional fees incurred in connection with the Business Combination.
Consolidated Results of Operations – For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025
Management / advisory fees. Management and advisory fees for the six months ended June 30, 2026, increased by $12.3 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. This increase was driven by higher fees due to increases in our AUM largely attributable to our acquisition of Kontora in the second quarter of 2025, positive net client flows, and strong portfolio performance.
Incentive fees. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, incentive fees decreased by $0.6 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. This decrease is attributable to less fund redemptions resulting in lower crystallized incentive fees in the TIG Arbitrage strategy for the current year as well as fee true-ups occurring in the first quarter, which led to lower crystallized incentive fees in the current period.
Distributions from investments. Distributions from investments for the six months ended June 30, 2026 increased by $9.8 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. This increase was due to higher distributions related to management and incentive fees in the External Strategic Managers strategies in the current period resulting from stronger performance of these strategies compared to the prior year.
Other fees / income. Other fees and income for the six months ended June 30, 2026 increased by $0.1 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. This increase was primarily driven by higher transactional income related to the Company’s acquisition of Kontora.
Compensation expense. Compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2026 increased by $13.7 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. This increase was primarily due to higher compensation costs tied to acquisition-driven compensation and benefits, acquisition-related earn-outs, new equity grants, and management restructuring expenses.
Non-compensation expense. Non-compensation expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2026 decreased by $4.5 million as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025, primarily driven by a $6.2 million decrease in one-time and transactional professional fees, a $1.3 million decrease in systems, technology, and telephone expenses as a result of a review of service providers resulting in rationalization, and a $0.9 million decrease in occupancy costs as a result of us decreasing the size of our real estate footprint. This was partially offset by a $3.0 million increase in general, administrative and other costs primarily due to negative foreign exchange adjustments, higher directors’ fees, and other miscellaneous expenses.
Other income (expenses)
Other income (expenses) for the six months ended June 30, 2026 decreased by $6.4 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease was primarily driven by an $18.5 million unrealized loss on our investment in Asian Credit and Special Situations, which reflects a decision by the investment manager to wind down the fund over a 12-month horizon. Separately, and unrelated to the fund investment, the gain on the fair value of our earn-out liabilities increased by $4.5 million compared to the prior period, partially offsetting the decline, along with other movements in other income.
Taxes
The Company’s effective tax rate was (0.3)% for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to 22.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2026 differed from the statutory U.S. corporate tax rate primarily due to the portion of income allocated to noncontrolling interests, state and local taxes, and the impact of a full valuation allowance on the Company’s deferred tax assets, including those generated in the Company’s subsidiaries in the U.S. and the U.K. and its investment in Umbrella. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2025 differed from the statutory U.S. corporate tax rate primarily due to the tax impact of mark-to-market losses associated with contingent liabilities, equity consideration in the Business Combination, and nondeductible professional fees incurred in connection with the Business Combination.
On March 19, 2026, the Company and certain of its affiliates on the one hand and the International Real Estate Businesses and the Administrators on the other hand entered into a binding settlement and intercompany loan deed memorializing the terms of the settlement. The settlement amount of £11.2 million ($15.0 million) is noninterest bearing and paid in installments through November 2027. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the outstanding balance of the settlement was $14.5$12.3 million.
On April 30, 2025, the Company acquired Kontora. See Note 4 (Business Combinations) in our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. Kontora has a term loan with HypoVereinsbank. Throughout the period of the term loan Kontora Family Office GmbH, as a standalone entity, is required to maintain economic equity of the higher of $1.8 million or 30% of the total assets of this standalone entity. At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the term loan had an outstanding principal amount of $0.4$0.3 million. In addition, Kontora has a revolving line of credit, with an aggregate borrowing facility of $0.9 million with HypoVereinsbank, which expires on July 25, 2029. The funded amounts under this revolving line of credit bear no restrictions on its use. At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, there was no$0.4 million outstanding borrowings under the revolving line of credit.
On February 22, 2024, the Company entered into an Investment Agreement (the “Allianz Investment Agreement”) with Allianz, pursuant to which, among other things, at the closing of the transaction, and based on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein: (i) Allianz purchased in the aggregate $250 million of the Company’s capital securities, consisting of (a) 140,000 shares of a newly created class of Series A Preferred Stock, with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share and (b) 19,318,580.96 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock, and (ii) the Company issued to Allianz warrants to purchase 5,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock at an exercise price of $7.40 per share of Class A Common Stock, subject to customary adjustments (the “Allianz Warrants”). As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, none of the Allianz Warrants have been exercised.
On May 15, 2024, in accordance with the Constellation Investment Agreement, the Company completed the sale to Constellation of 35,000 additional shares of Series C Preferred Stock for a purchase price equal to $35 million and issued additional Constellation Warrants to purchase 466,667 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, none of the Constellation Warrants have been exercised.
For the ThreeSix Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 Compared to the ThreeSix Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025
ALTI insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-02 | Allianz Se |
Other | 1,272,329 | — | — |
| 2026-06-16 | Keaney Timothy F |
Option exercise | 47,495 | — | — |
| 2026-06-16 | Bouzarif Ali |
Option exercise | 30,732 | — | — |
| 2026-06-16 | Corio Norma |
Option exercise | 30,732 | — | — |
| 2026-06-16 | Cetin Nazim |
Option exercise | 30,732 | — | — |
| 2026-06-16 | Wimmer Andreas |
Option exercise | 30,732 | — | — |
| 2026-06-16 | Brophy Warson Tracey |
Option exercise | 30,732 | — | — |
| 2026-06-16 | Furlong Mark F |
Option exercise | 30,732 | — | — |
Well-known investors holding ALTI (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 103,197 | $372.5K | 0.0% | Added 71% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 43,279 | $156.7K | — | Sold out |