Companies › ALZN

ALZN 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

Alzamend Neuro, Inc. · Nasdaq · Pharmaceutical Preparations · CIK 1677077 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from Alzamend Neuro, Inc.'s public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

11 / 19risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
1new risk-factor headings
3Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
1Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-07-22 (period ending 2026-04-30) with 10-K filed 2025-07-22 (period ending 2025-04-30).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

11new paragraphs
19removed paragraphs
26reworded paragraphs
17,933 → 16,939words in section

New heading “We rely on third parties to conduct our preclinical and clinical studies and perform other tasks for us. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, meet expected deadlines or comply with regulatory requirements, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize our medicines and drug candidates and our business could be substantially harmed.”

Removed heading “We have a limited operating history on which to judge our business prospects and management.”

Removed heading “Risks Related to Our Affiliates’ Control and Relationships”

Removed heading “Members of the Board of Directors and executive officers of our company and Hyperscale Data, Inc. (“HDI”), contain some of the same individuals, which may present potential conflicts of interest.”

Removed heading “The concentration of our stock ownership will limit your ability to influence corporate matters, including the ability to influence the outcome of director elections and other matters requiring stockholder approval.”

Removed heading “We are an “emerging growth company,” and the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies may make our common stock less attractive to investors.”

Removed heading “We will incur increased costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives and corporate governance practices.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: material weakness, investigation
“We are in the process of enhancing our internal control over financial reporting required to comply with this obligation, which process will be time-consuming, costly and complicated. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: material weakness, fine
“As a public company, we are required to maintain internal control over financial reporting and to report any material weaknesses in such internal controls. We must perform system and process evaluation and testing of our internal controls over financial reporting to allow management to report on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: delist, liquidity
“If our common stock is delisted, it could be more difficult to buy or sell our common stock and to obtain accurate quotations, and the price of our common stock could suffer a material decline. Delisting could also impair the liquidity of our common stock and could harm our ability to raise capital through alternative financing sources on terms acceptable to us, or at all, and may result in potential loss of confidence by investors, employees, and fewer business development opportunities.”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: material weakness

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

We have identified a material weaknessweaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.reporting Ifand ourmay remediation of this material weakness is not effective, or if we experienceidentify additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fail to maintain an effective system of internal controlscontrols, which may result in thematerial future,misstatements we may not be able to accurately or timely reportof our financial conditionstatements or resultscause of operations, which may adversely affect investor confidence in us and,to asfail a result, the value ofto meet our commonperiodic stock.reporting obligations.
see in full comparison
New text topics: investigation, regulation
“We have relied upon and plan to continue to rely upon third-party CROs to monitor and manage data and provide other services for our ongoing preclinical and clinical programs. We rely on these parties for execution of our preclinical and clinical studies, and control only certain aspects of their activities. Nevertheless, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our studies is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol, legal and regulatory requirements and scientific standards, and our reliance on the CROs does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: material weakness
“We have limited accounting personnel to adequately execute our accounting processes and other supervisory resources with which to address our internal control over financial reporting. In connection with the audit of our financial statements for the year ended April 30, 2025, we identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (56)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 3 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

As of April 30, 2025,2026, we had $3.9 million $711,000 in cash and cash equivalents. In February 2025, we entered into a transaction with an investor that resulted in raising an additional $4.0 million subsequent to year end. Based on our current operating plan, we believe that this funding will not be sufficient to fund our operations for the next twelve months. In particular, we need additional funds to allow us to fund Phase II clinical trials for AL001 in Alzheimer’s, BD, MDD and PTSD and to complete the on-going Phase I/IIA clinical trial for ALZN002 to treat mild to moderate dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. However, changing circumstances or inaccurate estimates by us may cause us to use capital significantly faster than we currently anticipate, and we may need to spend more money than currently expected because of circumstances beyond our control. For example, our ongoing clinical trial for ALZN002 or our planned clinical trials for AL001 may encounter technical, enrollment or other issues that could cause our development costs to increase more than we expect. We will not have sufficient funds to complete any of these planned or ongoing clinical trials or the clinical development of either AL001 or ALZN002 through regulatory approval. We will need to raise substantial additional capital to complete the development and commercialization of each of those product candidates, which additional capital, if available on reasonable terms if at all, may be raised through the sale of our common stock or other securities or through the entering into of alternative strategic transactions, orwhich could cause our stockholders to incur substantial dilution.

Reworded

Our future commercial revenues, if if any, will be derived from sales of products that we do not expect to be commercially available for sale for at least the next several years, if ever. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funding in connection with our continuing operations. Adequate additional financing may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. In addition, we may seek additional capital due to favorable market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we would be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our research and development programs or other operations.

Reworded

Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued a going concern opinionreport on our financial statements for the year ended April 30, 2025,2026, that contains an emphasis of a matter paragraph expressing substantial doubt thatabout weour canability to continue as ana ongoinggoing businessconcern due to insufficient capital for us to fund our operations. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty. If we are unable to successfully raise additional capital, we will need to create and implement alternate operational plans to continue as a going concern, and investors or other financing sources may be unwilling to provide additional funding to us on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

Reworded

We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company. We have recently initiated clinical trials for our AL001 and ALZN002 programs. To date, we have not initiated or completed a pivotal clinical trial, obtained marketing approval for any product candidates, manufactured a commercial scale product or arranged for a third party to do so on our behalf, or conducted sales and marketing activities necessary for successful product commercialization. Our ability to generate revenue depends heavily on, among other developments:

Removed

We have a limited operating history on which to judge our business prospects and management.

Removed

We were incorporated in February 2016 and commenced operations shortly thereafter. We have a limited operating history upon which to base an evaluation of our business and prospects. Operating results for future periods are subject to numerous uncertainties and we cannot assure you that we will achieve or sustain profitability. Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks encountered by companies in the early stage of development, particularly companies in new and rapidly evolving markets with long periods of time before they can ever generate revenue, and then subsequently achieve profitability, if ever. Future operating results will depend upon many factors, including our success in attracting and retaining motivated and qualified personnel, our ability to establish short term credit lines or obtain financing from other sources, our ability to develop and market new products or control costs, and general economic conditions. We cannot assure you that we will successfully address any of these contingencies.

Reworded

There are certain license fees and milestone payments required to be paid by us to the Licensor,Licensor pursuant to the terms of license agreements we have entered into with the Licensor. The license agreementsagreement for ALZN002 requirerequires us to pay royalty payments of 4% on net sales of products developed from the licensed technology for ALZN002ALZN002, while the license agreements for AL001 require that we pay combined royalty payments of 4.5% on net sales of products developed from the licensed technology for AL001. We have already paid an initial license fee of $200,000 for ALZN002 and an initial license fee of $200,000 for AL001. As an additional licensing fee for the license of ALZN002, the Licensor received 24,0122,668 shares of our common stock. As an additional licensing fee for the license of the AL001 technologies, the Licensor received 14,8531,650 shares of our common stock. Minimum royalties required under the AL001 License Agreements are $40,000 on the first anniversary of the first commercial sale, $80,000 on the second anniversary of the first commercial sale and $100,000 on the third anniversary of the first commercial sale and every year thereafter, for the life of the AL001 License Agreements. Minimum royalties required for ALZN002 are $20,000 on the first anniversary of the first commercial sale, $40,000 on the second anniversary of the first commercial sale and $50,000 on the third anniversary of the first commercial sale and every year thereafter, for the life of the ALZN002 License Agreement. Minimum royalties required under the November AL001 License Agreements are $40,000 on the first anniversary of the first commercial sale, $80,000 on the second anniversary of the first commercial sale and $100,000 on the third anniversary of the first commercial sale and every year thereafter, for the life of the AL001 License Agreements. Minimum royalties for ALZN002 are $20,000 on the first anniversary of the first commercial sale, $40,000 on the second anniversary first commercial sale and $50,000 on the third anniversary of the first commercial sale and every year thereafter, for the life of the ALZN002 License Agreement. Minimum royalties for November AL001 License Agreements are $40,000 on the first anniversary of the first commercial sale, $80,000 on the second anniversary first commercial sale and $100,000 on the third anniversary of the first commercial sale and every year thereafter, for the life of the November AL001 License Agreements .Additionally,Agreements. Additionally, we are required to pay milestone payments on the due dates to the Licensor for the license of the AL001 technologies and for the ALZN002 technology, as follows:

Reworded

If we fail to comply with our obligations in the agreements under which we license intellectual property and other rights from third parties or otherwise experience disruptions to our business relationships with the Licensor, we could lose license rights that are importantcritical to our business.

Reworded

We are a party to these license agreements with the Licensor and expect to enter into additional license agreements in the future. The existing license agreements impose, and we expect that future license agreements will impose, various diligence, milestone payment, royalty and other obligations on us. If we fail to comply with our obligations under these agreements, or we are subject to a bankruptcy, we may be required to make certain payments to the Licensor, we may lose the exclusivity of our license, or the Licensor may have the right to terminate the license, in which event we would not be able to develop or market products covered by the license and would be forced to wind downcease our operations. The Licensor or or any future licensor may take any of these actions, including terminating a license agreement. Additionally, the milestone and other payments payments associated with these licenses will make it less profitable for us to develop our product candidates. If the Licensor were to terminate terminate a license agreement for whatever reason, it would materially and adversely affect our business, financial position and future prospects prospects and you would likely lose the entirety of your investment in us.

Reworded

The development and commercial success of our product candidates will depend on a number of factors, including, without limitation, the following:

Reworded

A current trend in the U.S. health carehealthcare industry, as well as in other countries around the world, is toward cost containment. Large public and private payers, managed care organizations, group purchasing organizations and similar organizations are exerting increasing influence on decisions regarding the use of, and reimbursement levels for, particular treatments. Third-party payers, such as government programs, including Medicare in the United States, and private health carehealthcare insurers, carefully review and have increasingly been challenging the coverage of, and prices charged for, medical products and services. Many third-party payers limit coverage of or reimbursement for newly-approved healthhealthcare careproducts. products. Reimbursement rates and coverage from private health insurance companies vary depending on the company, the insurance plan and other factors. Cost-control initiatives could decrease the price we or our partners establish for products, which could result in lower product revenue and profitability.

Added

We rely on third parties to conduct our preclinical and clinical studies and perform other tasks for us. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, meet expected deadlines or comply with regulatory requirements, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize our medicines and drug candidates and our business could be substantially harmed.

Added

We have relied upon and plan to continue to rely upon third-party CROs to monitor and manage data and provide other services for our ongoing preclinical and clinical programs. We rely on these parties for execution of our preclinical and clinical studies, and control only certain aspects of their activities. Nevertheless, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our studies is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol, legal and regulatory requirements and scientific standards, and our reliance on the CROs does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. We, our CROs for our clinical programs and our clinical investigators are required to comply with GCPs, which are regulations and guidelines enforced by the FDA for all of our drug candidates in clinical development. The FDA enforces these regulations through periodic inspections of study sponsors, principal investigators, study sites and other contractors. If we or any of our CROs or clinical investigators fail to comply with applicable regulations, the clinical data generated in our clinical studies may be deemed unreliable and the FDA may require us to perform additional clinical studies before approving our marketing applications. In addition, our pivotal clinical trials must be conducted with drug product produced under GMP regulations. We cannot assure you that upon inspection by a given regulatory authority, such regulatory authority will determine that any of our clinical studies comply with GCP regulations. In addition, our clinical studies must be conducted with product candidates which are produced under cGMP regulations. Our failure to comply with these regulations may require us to repeat clinical studies, which would delay the regulatory approval process. We could also be subject to government investigations and enforcement actions.

Added

If any of our relationships with these third-party CROs terminate, we may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative CROs or to do so on commercially reasonable terms. For example, in February 2024, Biorasi, our CRO for our Phase I/IIA clinical trial for ALZN002 to treat mild to moderate dementia of the Alzheimer’s type, terminated our contract with it. While we are currently pursuing the engagement of a replacement CRO on this clinical study, as a result of the novel nature of the clinical study, we have been unable to find a suitable CRO with the requisite experience and expertise to manage the study.

Added

In addition, our CROs are not our employees, and except for remedies available to us under our agreements with such CROs, we cannot control whether or not they devote sufficient time and resources to our ongoing clinical and nonclinical programs. If CROs do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or obligations or meet expected deadlines, if they need to be replaced or if the quality or accuracy of the clinical data they or our clinical investigators obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our clinical protocols, regulatory requirements or for other reasons, our clinical trials may be extended, delayed or terminated and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or successfully commercialize our drug candidates. As a result, our results of operations and the commercial prospects for our drug candidates would be harmed, our costs could increase and our ability to generate revenues could be delayed.

Added

Switching or adding additional CROs involves additional cost and delays, which can materially influence our ability to meet our desired clinical development timelines. There can be no assurance that we will not encounter similar challenges or delays in the future or that these delays or challenges will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and prospects.

Reworded

Even if we fully comply with all applicable laws and regulations, the FDA may still determine that our clinical data are insufficient for final approval of an NDA or a BLA. The process required by the FDA and most foreign regulatory authorities before human health carehealthcare pharmaceuticals may be marketed generally involves nonclinical laboratory and, in some cases, animal teststesting; submission of an IND, which must become effective before clinical clinical trials may begin; adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials to establish the safety and efficacy of the proposed drug for its intended use or uses; pre-approval inspection of manufacturing facilities and clinical trial sites; and FDA approval of an NDA or BLA, which must occur before a drug can be marketed or sold.sold, as discussed above.

Reworded

Despite billions of dollars invested by the NIH and the biopharmaceutical industry in research programs to develop novel therapeutics for Alzheimer’s, the FDA has hasapproved only approved threefour new drugs for Alzheimer’s since 2003; in June 2021, aducanumab (Biogen, Inc) received approval from the FDA for the treatment of Alzheimer’s using the accelerated approval pathway; in July 2023, Leqembi (Eisai) received full approval by the FDA for treatment of Alzheimer’s; in July 2024, Kisunla (Eli Lilly) received full approval by the FDA for treatment of Alzheimer’s; and in JulyApril 2024,2026, KisunlaAuvelity (EliAxsome LillyTherapeutics) received full approval by the FDA for treatment of Alzheimer’s.agitation associated with Alzheimer’s dementia. Since 2003, many new types and classes of drugs have been developed and tested in Alzheimer’s, including monoclonal antibodies, gamma secretase modulators and inhibitors, β-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme inhibitors, receptor for advanced glycation end-products inhibitors, nicotinic partial agonists and allosteric modulators, serotonin subtype receptor antagonists, and others. Except for Biogen’s, Eisai’s and Eli Lilly’s approvals,and Axsome Therapeutics’ approvals referred to above, virtually all of these scientific programs have failed in clinical testing.

Reworded

As a condition of approval of an NDA or a BLA, the FDA may require a REMS to ensure that the benefits of the drug outweigh the potential risks. REMS elements can include medication guides, communication plans for health carehealthcare professionals, and elements to assure safe use (“ETASU”). ETASU’s can include, but are not limited to, special training or certification for prescribing or dispensing, dispensing only under certain circumstances, special monitoring, and the use of patient registries. Moreover, product approval may require substantial post-approval testing and surveillance to monitor the drug’s safety or efficacy. We may be required to adopt a REMS for AL001 or ALZN002 to ensure that the benefits outweigh the risks of abuse, misuse, diversion and other potential safety concerns. Even if the risk of abuse, misuse or diversion are not as high as for some other products, there can be no assurance that the FDA will approve a manageable REMS for AL001 or ALZN002, which could create material and significant limits on our ability to successfully commercialize AL001 and ALZN002 in the U.S. Delays in the REMS approval process could result in delays in the NDA or BLA approval process, respectively. In addition, as part of the REMS, the FDA could require significant restrictions, such as restrictions on the prescription, distribution and patient use of the product, which could significantly impact our ability to effectively commercialize AL001 or ALZN002, and dramatically reduce their market potential thereby adversely impacting our business, financial condition and results of operations. Even if initial REMS are not highly restrictive, if, after launch, AL001, ALZN002 and other drug candidates were to become subject to significant abuse/non-medical use or diversion from licit channels, this could lead to negative regulatory consequences, including a more restrictive REMS, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Reworded

If we are found in violation of “fraud and abuse” laws, we may be subject to criminal and civil penalties and/or be suspended or excluded from participation in government-run health carehealthcare programs, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Reworded

If we are successful in obtaining marketing approval for our products in the United States and elsewhere, we will be subject to various health carehealthcare “fraud and abuse” laws, including anti-kickback laws, false claims laws and other laws intended to reduce fraud and abuse in government-run healthhealthcare careprograms, programs, which could materially and adversely affect us, particularly upon successful commercialization of our products in the United States. For example, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute makes it illegal for any person, including a prescription drug manufacturer (or a party acting on its behalf), to knowingly and willfully solicit, receive, offer or pay any remuneration that is intended to induce the referral of business, including the purchase, order or prescription of a particular drug for which payment may be made under a U.S. health carehealthcare program such as Medicare or Medicaid. Under U.S. federal government regulations, some arrangements, known as safe harbors, are deemed not to violate the Anti-Kickback Statute. Compliance with every element of a safe harbor regulation is required for the arrangement to be protected. However, arrangements that do not comply with a safe harbor are not per se illegal. Instead, they will be analyzed on a case-by-case basis. Although we intend to seek to structure our business arrangements in compliance with all applicable requirements, these laws are broadly written, and it is often difficult to determine precisely how the law will be applied in specific circumstances. Accordingly, it is possible that our practices may be challenged under the Anti-Kickback Statute and similar laws in other jurisdictions.

Reworded

Further, false claims laws prohibit anyone from knowingly and willfully presenting or causing to be presented for payment to third-party payers, including government payers, reimbursement claims for drugs or services that are false or fraudulent, claims for items or services that were not provided as claimed, or claims for medically unnecessary items or services. Cases have been brought under false claims laws alleging that off-label promotion of pharmaceutical products or the payment of kickbacks by pharmaceutical providers has resulted in the submission of false claims to governmental health carehealthcare programs. Under laws such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 in the United States, we are prohibited from knowingly and willfully executing a scheme to defraud any health carehealthcare benefit program, including private payers, or knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for health carehealthcare benefits, items or services. Violations of fraud and abuse laws may be punishable by criminal and/or civil sanctions, including fines and/or exclusion or suspension from government-run healthhealthcare care programs such as Medicare and Medicaid and debarment from contracting with the U.S. and other governments. In addition, in the United States, individuals have the ability to bring actions on behalf of the government and potentially share in the recovery under the federal False Claims Act as well as under state false claims laws.

Reworded

Many states in the United States have adopted fraud and abuse laws similar to their federal counterparts, including laws similar to the Anti-Kickback Statute, some of which apply to the referral of patients for health carehealthcare services reimbursed by any source, not just governmental payers. In addition, California and some other states in the United States have passed laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the April 2003 Office of Inspector General Compliance Program Guidance for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and/or the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Code on Interactions with Health Care Professionals. In addition, several states impose other marketing restrictions or require pharmaceutical companies to make marketing or price disclosures to the state. There are ambiguities as to what is required to comply with these state requirements and if we fail to comply with an applicable state law requirement, we could be subject to penalties.

Reworded

We have yet to receive definitive guidance on the application of fraud and abuse laws to our business. Law enforcement authorities are increasingly focused on enforcing these laws, and it is possible that some of our future practices may be challenged under these laws. While we believe we will be able to structure our business arrangements to comply with these laws, it is possible that the government could in the future allege violations of, or convict us of violating, these laws. If we are found in violation of one of these laws, we could be required to pay a penalty and could be suspended or excluded from participation in certain government-run health carehealthcare programs, and our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.

Reworded

Our future growth and success depend in part on our continued ability to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified management and scientific personnel. We are highly dependent upon our senior management, particularly Stephan Jackman, our Chief Executive Officer, David J. Katzoff, our Chief Financial Officer, Kenneth S. Cragun, our Senior Vice President of Finance and Henry Nisser, our Executive Vice President and General Counsel. The loss of services of any of these individuals could delay or prevent the successful development of our current or future product pipeline, completion of our planned development efforts or the commercialization of AL001 or ALZN002. It is possible that current or former employees of ours could put forward claims for an alleged right to our patents and demand compensation therefor. If one or more of the key personnel were to leave us and engage in competing operations, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

Reworded

We expect to face substantial competition, with other entities possibly discovering, developing or commercializing products before, or more successfully than,than we do.

Reworded

The development, FDA approval and commercialization of new therapy and vaccine products is highly competitive. We will face competition with respect to AL001, ALZN002 and any other product candidates that we may seek to develop or commercialize in the future, from major pharmaceutical companies, specialty pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies worldwide. In addition to existing therapeutic treatments for the indications we are targeting with AL001 and ALZN002, we also face potential competition from other drug candidates in development by other companies. Our potential competitors include, without limitation, large health carehealthcare companies, such as AbbVie, Axesome Therapeutics, Inc., Biogen Inc., Eisai Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Sanofi S.A., Eli Lilly and Company, Bayer AG, Novartis AG, Johnson and Johnson and Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH. We also know of several smaller early-stage companies that are developing products for use in our segment of the market. Some of the potential competitive compounds referred to above are being developed by large, well-financed and established pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies or have been partnered with such companies, which may give them development, regulatory and marketing advantages over our products.

Reworded

We rely on the FDA to assist with the development of our product candidates. The ability of the FDA to review and approve new drug products can be affected by a variety of factors outside of our control, including government budget and funding levels, the FDA’s ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees, and statutory, regulatory, and policy changes. Average review times at the agency have fluctuated fluctuated in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of other government agencies that fund research and development activities activities is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable.

Reworded

Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time necessary for our product candidates to be reviewed and/or potentially approved by necessary government agencies, which would adversely affect our business. For example, over the last several years, including for 35 days beginning on December 22, 2018, and 43 days between October 1 and November 12, 2025, the U.S. government has shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, have had to furlough critical FDA employees and stop critical activities. If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. If the timing of FDA’s review and approval of new products is delayed, the estimated timing of our drug development program may be delayed, which would materially increase costs of drug development and harm our operations or business.

Removed

Risks Related to Our Affiliates’ Control and Relationships

Removed

Members of the Board of Directors and executive officers of our company and Hyperscale Data, Inc. (“HDI”), contain some of the same individuals, which may present potential conflicts of interest.

Removed

Milton C. (Todd) Ault III, our Founder, and Vice Chairman, has significant influence over our Company, directly and indirectly through his controlling equity interest in Ault & Company, Inc. (“Ault & Co.”), the parent of Ault Life Sciences, Inc. (“ALSI”) and Ault Life Sciences Fund, LLC (“ALSF”). Mr. Ault is also the Executive Chairman and single largest stockholder (through his control of Ault & Co.) of HDI, a publicly traded diversified holding company that owns and operates a data center at which it mines digital assets and offers colocation and hosting services for the emerging AI ecosystems and other industries and through wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries and strategic investments, support a diverse range of industries, including an artificial intelligence software platform, social gaming platform, equipment rental services, defense/aerospace, industrial, automotive, medical/biopharma and hotel operations. The Board of Directors (“Board”) and executive officers of our company and the board of directors and executive officers of HDI contain some of the same individuals, all of whom devote a portion of their business and professional time and efforts to the respective businesses of our company as well as HDI. In addition to Mr. Ault, William B. Horne, the Chairman of the Board, is the Chief Executive Officer and a director of HDI, Henry Nisser, our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and a director of our company, is the President, General Counsel and a director of HDI and Kenneth S. Cragun, our Senior Vice President of Finance is the Chief Financial Officer of HDI.

Removed

While we believe that our business and technologies are distinguishable from those of HDI and that we do not compete in the markets in which HDI competes, Mr. Ault and the other named individuals may have potential conflicts of interest with respect to, among other things, potential corporate opportunities, business combinations, joint ventures and/or other business opportunities that may become available to them, our company or HDI. Moreover, while Mr. Ault and the other named individuals have agreed to devote a portion of their business and professional time and efforts to our company, potential conflicts of interest also include the amount of time and effort devoted by each of them to the affairs of HDI. We may be materially adversely affected if Mr. Ault and/or the other named individuals choose to place the interests of HDI before those of our company. Each of Mr. Ault and the other named individuals has agreed that, to the extent such opportunities arise, he will carefully consider a number of factors, including whether such opportunities were presented to him in his capacity as an officer or director of our company, whether such opportunities are within our company’s line of business or consistent with our strategic objectives and whether our company will be able to undertake or benefit from such opportunities. In addition, our Board has adopted a policy whereby any future transactions between us and any of our affiliates, officers, directors, principal stockholders or any affiliates of the foregoing will be on terms no less favorable to our company than could reasonably be obtained in “arm’s length” transactions with independent third parties, and any such transactions will also be approved by a majority of our disinterested independent directors. Each of Mr. Ault and the other named individuals owe fiduciary duties of good faith, care and loyalty to our company under Delaware law. However, the failure of our management to resolve any conflicts of interest in favor of our company could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Reworded

We are not in compliance with the Nasdaq continued listing requirements. If we are unable to complyregain withcompliance with, or thereafter maintain compliance with, the continued continued listing requirements of The Nasdaq Capital Market, our commonCommon stockStock could be delisted, which would adversely affect our commonCommon Stock’s stock market price and liquidity and reduce our ability to raise capital.

Added

On March 20, 2026, we were notified by the staff of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) that that our stockholders’ equity as reported in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2026 (the “Form 10-Q”), did not satisfy the continued listing requirement under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(1) for the Nasdaq Capital Market, which requires that a listed company’s stockholders’ equity be at least $2.5 million. As reported on its Form 10-Q, our stockholders’ equity as of January 31, 2026 was approximately $2.2 million. As reported in this Annual Report, our stockholders’ equity as of April 30, 2026 was approximately $0.7 million.

Added

In accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rules, we were provided an initial period of 45 calendar days, or until May 4, 2026, to submit a plan to regain compliance. On May 4, 2026, we submitted a plan to regain compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(1) to Nasdaq. On May 19, 2026, Nasdaq granted us an extension of time to regain compliance on or before September 16, 2026.

Added

There can be no assurance that we will be able to regain compliance with the minimum stockholders’ equity requirement on or before September 16, 2026, or if we do, that we will in the future be able to maintain compliance with the stockholders’ equity requirement or any other Nasdaq listing standard.

Added

If our common stock is delisted, it could be more difficult to buy or sell our common stock and to obtain accurate quotations, and the price of our common stock could suffer a material decline. Delisting could also impair the liquidity of our common stock and could harm our ability to raise capital through alternative financing sources on terms acceptable to us, or at all, and may result in potential loss of confidence by investors, employees, and fewer business development opportunities.

Removed

The listing of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market is contingent on our compliance with the Nasdaq Capital Market’s conditions for continued listing. While we are currently in compliance with Nasdaq listing requirements, we have not been in compliance in the past year.

Removed

If we were to fail to meet a Nasdaq Capital Market listing requirement, we may be subject to delisting by the Nasdaq Capital Market. In the event our common stock is no longer listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market, our trading volume and share price may decrease and we may experience further difficulties in raising capital which could materially affect our operations and financial results. Further, delisting from the Nasdaq Capital Market could also have other negative effects, including potential loss of confidence by investors, employees, and fewer business development opportunities. Finally, delisting could make it harder for us to raise capital and sell securities.

Removed

The concentration of our stock ownership will limit your ability to influence corporate matters, including the ability to influence the outcome of director elections and other matters requiring stockholder approval.

Removed

Our executive officers, directors and the holders of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, in the aggregate, beneficially own a significant percentage of our common stock. As a result, these stockholders, acting together, will have significant influence over all matters that require approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. Corporate actions might be taken even if other stockholders oppose them. This concentration of ownership might also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of our company that other stockholders may view as beneficial.

Reworded

One element of our strategy is to expand our pipeline of pharmaceuticals based on our technology and advance these product candidates through clinical development for the treatment of a variety of indications. Although our research and development efforts to date have resulted in a number of development programs based on our technology, we may not ultimately be able to develop product candidates that are safe and effective. Even if we are successful in continuing to expand our pipeline, the potential product candidates that we identify may not be suitable for clinical development, including as a result of being shown to have harmful side effects or other characteristics that indicate that they are unlikely to receive marketing approval and achieve market acceptance. In addition, if we attempt to apply our technology to develop product candidates for indications outside of Alzheimer’s, we will need to evaluate the preclinical data and determine if additional data are needed to support the new indications. If we do not successfully develop and commercialize product candidates based upon our technological approach, we will not be able to obtain product revenue in future periods, which would make it unlikelyimpossible thatfor weus wouldto ever achieve profitability.

Reworded

We have identified a material weaknessweaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.reporting Ifand ourmay remediation of this material weakness is not effective, or if we experienceidentify additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fail to maintain an effective system of internal controlscontrols, which may result in thematerial future,misstatements we may not be able to accurately or timely reportof our financial conditionstatements or resultscause of operations, which may adversely affect investor confidence in us and,to asfail a result, the value ofto meet our commonperiodic stock.reporting obligations.

Added

We are required to comply with certain provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley Act”). Section 404 requires that we document and test our internal control over financial reporting and issue management’s assessment of our internal control over financial reporting. Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2026. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Based on our assessment, as of April 30, 2026, we concluded that our internal control over financial reporting contained a material weakness.

Added

The weakness will not be considered remediated, however, until the applicable controls operate for a sufficient period of time and our management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively. If we fail to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the accuracy and timeliness of the filing of our annual and quarterly reports may be materially adversely affected and could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock. In addition, a material weakness in the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting could result in an increased chance of fraud and the loss of customers, reduce our ability to obtain financing and require additional expenditures to comply with these requirements, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Removed

We have limited accounting personnel to adequately execute our accounting processes and other supervisory resources with which to address our internal control over financial reporting. In connection with the audit of our financial statements for the year ended April 30, 2025, we identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weaknesses related to a lack of sufficient number of qualified personnel within our accounting function to adequately segregate duties, to perform sufficient reviews and approval of manual journal entries posted to the general ledger and to consistently execute review procedures over general ledger account reconciliations, financial statement preparation and accounting for non-routine transactions and, we have not designed and implemented effective Information Technology General Controls (“ITGC”) related to access controls to payment and financial accounting systems.

Removed

Due to the size of our company and our limited financial resources, we will need to increase our accounting department in the future to fully remediate our current weakness. The material weakness will not be considered to be remediated until the applicable remediated controls are operating for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively.

Removed

If the steps we take do not correct the material weakness in a timely manner, we will be unable to conclude that we maintain effective internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, there could continue to be a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Removed

As a public company, we are required to maintain internal control over financial reporting and to report any material weaknesses in such internal controls. We must perform system and process evaluation and testing of our internal controls over financial reporting to allow management to report on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act also requires that our management report on internal control over financial reporting be attested to by our independent registered public accounting firm, to the extent we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (JOBS Act). We do not expect our independent registered public accounting firm to attest to our management report on internal control over financial reporting for so long as we are an emerging growth company.

Removed

We are in the process of enhancing our internal control over financial reporting required to comply with this obligation, which process will be time-consuming, costly and complicated. If we identify any additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, if we are unable to comply with the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner, if we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or when required in the future, if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an opinion as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports and the market price of our common stock could be adversely affected, and we could become subject to investigations by the Nasdaq Stock Market, the SEC, or other regulatory authorities, which could require additional financial and management resources.

Reworded

Our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and certain provisions of Delaware law could have the effect of making it more difficult or more expensive for a third party to acquire, or discouraging a third party from attempting to acquire, control of our company,Company, even when these attempts may be in the best interests of our stockholders. For example, we are governed by Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. In general, Section 203 prohibits a public Delaware corporation from engaging in a “business combination” with an “interested stockholder” for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner. A “business combination” includes mergers, asset sales or other transactions resulting in a financial benefit to the stockholder. An “interested stockholder” is a person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns, or within the past three years did own, 15% or more of the corporation’s outstanding voting stock. These provisions provisions may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our company.Company.

Removed

We are an “emerging growth company,” and the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies may make our common stock less attractive to investors.

Removed

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act. For so long as we remain an emerging growth company, we are permitted and plan to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. These exemptions include not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of SOX Section 404, not being required to comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. As a result, the information we provide stockholders will be different than the information that is available with respect to other public companies. In this Annual Report, we have not included all of the executive compensation-related information that would be required if we were not an emerging growth company. We cannot predict whether investors will find our common stock less attractive if we rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock, and our stock price may be more volatile.

Removed

We will incur increased costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives and corporate governance practices.

Removed

As a public company, and particularly after we are no longer an emerging growth company (or, to a lesser extent, a smaller reporting company), we will incur significant legal, accounting, and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the listing requirements of The Nasdaq Capital Market, and other applicable securities rules and regulations impose various requirements on public companies, including establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and corporate governance practices. We expect that we will need to hire additional accounting, finance, and other personnel in connection with our becoming, and our efforts to comply with the requirements of being, a public company, and our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time towards maintaining compliance with these requirements. These requirements will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, we expect that the rules and regulations applicable to us as a public company may make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, which could make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our Board. We are currently evaluating these rules and regulations and cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs. These rules and regulations are often subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

16new paragraphs
36removed paragraphs
14reworded paragraphs
6,377 → 3,898words in section

New heading “At-the-Market Offering”

Removed heading “Emerging Growth Company Status”

Removed heading “Series B Preferred Financing”

Removed heading “Series A Preferred Financing”

Removed heading “Series C Preferred Financing”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: fine
“Lithium is a commonly prescribed drug for manic episodes in BD type 1 as well as maintenance therapy of BD in patients with a history of manic episodes. Lithium is also prescribed off-label for MDD, BD and treatment of PTSD, among other disorders. Lithium was the first mood stabilizer approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and is still a first-line treatment option (considered the “gold standard”) but is underutilized perhaps because of the need for TDM. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: fine
“We are an emerging growth company, as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”). Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards issued subsequent to the enactment of the JOBS Act, until such time as those standards apply to private companies. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: lawsuit
“During the years ended April 30, 2026 and 2025, we incurred professional fees of $2.2 million and $618,000, respectively. During the year ended April 30, 2026, we incurred $1.9 million in legal fees, $190,000 in audit and tax fees, $95,000 in investor relations and $7,000 in other professional fees. During the year ended April 30, 2025, we incurred $243,000 in legal fees, $221,000 in audit and tax fees, $149,000 in investor relations and $5,000 in other professional fees. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: regulation
“The Series C Convertible Preferred Stock has a stated value of $10,000 per share (“Series C Stated Value”) and accrued dividends at the rate of 15% per annum, payable quarterly in arrears in cash or paid-in-kind shares, in Orchid’s sole discretion. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“Emerging Growth Company Status”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“Series B Preferred Financing”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (66)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 7 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Removed

Emerging Growth Company Status

Removed

We are an emerging growth company, as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”). Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards issued subsequent to the enactment of the JOBS Act, until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have elected to use this extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until the earlier of the date that it (i) is no longer an emerging growth company or (ii) affirmatively and irrevocably opts out of the extended transition period provided in the JOBS Act. As a result, these financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with the new or revised accounting pronouncements as of public company effective dates.

Reworded

We announced that we successfully identified a maximum tolerated dose (“MTD”) for development of AL001 from a multiple-ascending dose study as assessed by an independent safety review committee. This dose, providing lithium at a lithium carbonate equivalent dose of 240 mg 3-times daily (“TID”), is designed to be unlikely to require lithium therapeutic drug monitoring (“TDM”). Also, this MTD is risk mitigatedrisk-mitigated for the purpose of treating fragile populations, such as Alzheimer’s patients.

Removed

Lithium is a commonly prescribed drug for manic episodes in BD type 1 as well as maintenance therapy of BD in patients with a history of manic episodes. Lithium is also prescribed off-label for MDD, BD and treatment of PTSD, among other disorders. Lithium was the first mood stabilizer approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and is still a first-line treatment option (considered the “gold standard”) but is underutilized perhaps because of the need for TDM. Lithium was the first drug that required TDM by regulatory authorities in product labelling because the effective and safe range of therapeutic drug blood concentrations is narrow and well defined for treatment of BD when using lithium salts. Excursions above this range can be toxic, and below can impair effectiveness. Existing lithium drugs suffer from chronic toxicity, poor physicochemical properties, and poor brain bioavailability. Alzamend’s novel AL001 formulation, a lithium-salicylate/L-proline engineered ionic cocrystal, is designed to overcome the toxicities associated with conventional lithium salts, promising a next-generation lithium treatment with an enhanced safety profile and advantageous distribution to brain and brain structures.

Reworded

Based on the results from our Phase IIA MAD study, we plan to initiate five clinical trials to determine relative increased lithium levels in the brain compared to a marketed lithium salt for healthy subject and patients diagnosed with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s, BD, MDD and PTSD, based on published mouse studies that predict that lithium can be given at lower doses for equivalent therapeutic benefit when treating with AL001. For example, the goal is to replace the amount of lithium needed for maintenance treatment of BD with a clinically relevant, lower AL001 lithium carbonate equivalent lithium dose. Such lithium dose mitigation could redefine the landscape of neuropsychiatric, neurodegenerative, neurodegenerative, and neurological treatment practices. In August 2024, we announced that we had partnered with Massachusetts General Hospital to serve as the CRO for these clinical trials.

Added

In August 2024, we announced a partnership with MGH and Harvard Medical School to conduct five Phase II imaging clinical trials. The purpose of these trials is to assess the comparative increase in lithium levels within the brain and its structures as opposed to a commonly marketed lithium salt among healthy subjects and patients afflicted with Alzheimer’s, BD, MDD and PTSD.

Added

In November 2024, we announced a full data set from a nonclinical study comparing brain and plasma lithium exposures between AL001 and lithium carbonate in Alzheimer’s transgenic mice. This study was a precursor to the five clinical trials and showed that AL001 exhibited consistently higher lithium concentrations in brain tissues, particularly at lower doses, compared to lithium carbonate.

Added

For these clinical trials, we partnered with Tesla Dynamic Coils BV to create a head coil to enable whole-brain imaging of lithium with remarkable resolution, allowing precise quantification within brain structures. The coil will be used to help identify the disease-specific target doses of AL001 that improve the balance of safety and efficacy compared to lithium carbonate. The coil will also be used to scan the entire brain, helping us clearly identify the different structures and important areas necessary for understanding how lithium works and moves within the brain. We announced completion of the head coil in February 2025.

Added

In May 2025, we announced the initiation, enrollment and dosing of the first patient for the healthy human patients. This clinical trial has the following objectives:

Added

In November 2025, we announced the completion of the clinical portion of this study and reported pharmacokinetics topline data in March 2026, with the following results: (1) Bioequivalence Confirmed: AL001 delivered 101% of total lithium blood exposure and 97% of peak lithium levels vs. standard lithium carbonate; (2) Superior Brain Penetration: AL001 showed numerically higher lithium concentrations in all measured brain regions, including whole brain; and (3) Faster Brain Uptake: AL001 reached peak brain concentration in 6.7 hours vs. 8.4 hours for standard lithium carbonate. In April 2026, we announced pharmacodynamic topline data of the healthy human subjects with the following results:

Added

Full pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic results are expected in August 2026.

Added

In March 2026, we announced the initiation of the Phase II Clinical Trial of AL001 “Lithium in Brain” Study in Patients with BD and expect to report topline data in the fourth quarter of 2026. The clinical trials for treatment of patients with MDD and PTSD are expected to commence in the fourth quarter of 2026, followed by Alzheimer’s in the first quarter of 2027. These projected timelines reflect our commitment to advancing our clinical development programs across multiple neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative indications.

Removed

On November 19, 2024, we announced a final full data set from a nonclinical study comparing brain and plasma lithium exposures between AL001 and lithium carbonate in Alzheimer’s transgenic mice. The study was conducted at the University of South Florida and the bioanalytical procedures for determination of lithium concentration in the brain and plasma samples were conducted under good laboratory practice standards by Sannova Analytical LLC. The study involved administering AL001, a good manufacturing practices-quality active pharmaceutical ingredient (“API”) to 5XFAD mice, a recognized model for Alzheimer’s research, to compare its effects against lithium carbonate, an FDA approved and marketed API. Mice received either high or low doses scaled to humans of both AL001 and lithium carbonate over a 14-day period to observe pharmacokinetic steady-state drug conditions. On the 15th day, the mice were analyzed to assess how the treatments affected lithium concentrations in different brain regions and in their plasma.

Removed

Based on the study, both treatments had no negative impact on the mice's body weight or clinical signs during the treatment period. AL001 showed lower plasma lithium levels than lithium carbonate, reducing the risk of adverse systemic effects, suggesting an expansion for safety of lithium’s therapeutic index. Further, AL001 showed consistently higher lithium concentrations in brain tissues, particularly at lower doses, compared to lithium carbonate. Finally, the study found that different brain regions absorb and retain lithium differently. This means treatments can potentially be tailored to target specific brain areas, allowing for more precise treatment of various brain-related conditions when applied in human studies.

Removed

These results highlight the potential clinical advantages of AL001 for conditions like Alzheimer’s, BD, MDD and PTSD at low doses. By reducing the systemic burden, AL001 could lessen the risk of side effects such as thyroid and kidney complications often associated with extant lithium therapies. This positions AL001 as a promising candidate for safer long-term treatment options, without the need for TDM. This innovation is specifically designed to address the needs of fragile populations, such as elderly and Alzheimer’s patients, by offering a potentially more efficient and safer alternative to existing treatments.

Removed

The dosing level identified as optimal in this robust nonclinical study will serve as the foundation for advancing the evaluation of AL001 in the comprehensive ‘Lithium in Brain’ Phase II clinical trials. These trials, conducted in collaboration with Massachusetts General Hospital, will encompass a diverse cohort of both healthy subjects and patients diagnosed with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease, BD, MDD and PTSD. In May 2025, we began the trial and dosed the first healthy subject.

Reworded

On September 28, 2022, we submitted an Investigational New Drug (“IND”) application to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA ”) for ALZN002 and received a “study may proceed” letter on October 31, 2022. The product candidate is an immunotherapy vaccine designed to treat mild to moderate dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. ALZN002 is a proprietary “active” immunotherapy product, which means it is produced by each patient’s immune system. It consists of autologous DCs that are activated white blood cells taken from each individual patient so that they can be engineered outside of the body to attack Alzheimer’s-related amyloid-beta proteins. These DCs are pulsed with a novel amyloid-beta peptide (E22W) designed to bolster the ability of the patient’s immune system to combat Alzheimer’s, with the goal being to foster tolerance to treatment for safety purposes while stimulating the immune system to reduce the brain’s beta-amyloid protein burden, resulting in reduced Alzheimer’s signs and symptoms. Compared to passive immunization treatment approaches that use foreign blood products (such as monoclonal antibodies), active immunization with ALZN002 is anticipated to offer a more robust and long-lasting effect on the clearance of amyloid. This could provide a safer approach due to its reliance on autologous immune components, using each individual patient’s own white blood cells rather than foreign cells and/or blood products.

Reworded

On April 3, 2023, we announced the initiation of a Phase I/IIA clinical trial for ALZN002 to treat mild to moderate dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. The purpose of this trial is to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of multiple ascending doses of ALZN002 compared with that of a placebo in 20-30 subjects with mild to moderate morbidity. The primary goal of this clinical trial is to determine an appropriate dose of ALZN002 for treatment of patients with Alzheimer’s in a larger Phase IIB efficacy and safety clinical trial. On February 13, 2024, we received notice from Biorasi, LLC (“Biorasi”), the company weformerly engaged as our contract research organization (“CRO”), Biorasi, LLC (“Biorasi”) that Biorasi was terminating our contract with them.Biorasi. We are currently pursuing the engagement of a replacement CRO. Due to the scientific and operational complexities of the ALZN002 trial, along with the limited number of CROs with the expertise and capacity to complete the trial, we have experienced a delay in engaging a new CRO. We do not expect to restart this trial in first quarter of 2027.

Reworded

Results of Operations for the Year Ended April 30, 20252026 Compared to the Year Ended April 30, 20242025

Reworded

During the years ended April 30, 20252026 and 2024,2025, we incurred professional fees of $656,000$625,000 and $2.9 million,$656,000, respectively, which were primarily comprised of professional fees attributed to various types of scientific services, including FDA consulting services. The decrease relates to lower professional fees incurred during the year ended April 30, 2025,2026, compared to professional fees incurred for the preparation for clinical trials for AL001 and ALZN002 during the year ended April 30, 2024.2025.

Added

During the year ended April 30, 2026, we incurred $47,000 in research and development stock-based compensation expense related to stock option grants to consultants. No such expense was incurred during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2025. The increase in research and development stock-based compensation expense for the year ended April 30, 2026, was a result of the expense recorded as a result of the vesting of newly granted stock options.

Reworded

During the years ended April 30, 20252026 and 2024, 2025, we incurred clinical trial fees of $716,000$2.9 million and $3.2 million,$716,000, respectively. Clinical trial fees for the year ended April 30, 2026 were for our Phase IIB clinical trial for AL001 for healthy subjects. Clinical trial fees for the year ended April 30, 2025 2025 were for our Phase IIA clinical trial for AL001. Clinical trial fees for the year ended April 30, 2024 were $1.9 million for our Phase IIA clinical trial for AL001 and $1.3 million for our Phase I clinical trial for ALZN002.

Added

During the years ended April 30, 2026 and 2025, we incurred other fees of $23,000 and $43,000, respectively, which were primarily comprised of scientific materials required for our clinical trials.

Added

General and administrative expenses for the years ended April 30, 2026 and 2025 were $5.1 million and $3.1 million, respectively. As reflected in the table below, general and administrative expenses primarily consisted of the following expense categories: salary and benefits; professional fees; insurance; stock-based compensation expense; marketing fees; and Board fees. For the years ended April 30, 2026 and 2025, the remaining general and administrative expenses of $469,000 and $347,000, respectively, primarily consisted of payments for franchise taxes, depreciation, transfer agent fees, travel, and other office expenses, none of which is significant individually.

Added

During the years ended April 30, 2026 and 2025, we incurred $988,000 and $1.0 million, respectively, in employee-related expenses. As of April 30, 2026, we had four full-time and two part-time employees. The decrease in salary and benefits expense was a result of the reduction of one part-time employee during the year ended April 30, 2026.

Added

During the years ended April 30, 2026 and 2025, we incurred professional fees of $2.2 million and $618,000, respectively. During the year ended April 30, 2026, we incurred $1.9 million in legal fees, $190,000 in audit and tax fees, $95,000 in investor relations and $7,000 in other professional fees. During the year ended April 30, 2025, we incurred $243,000 in legal fees, $221,000 in audit and tax fees, $149,000 in investor relations and $5,000 in other professional fees. The increase in legal fees was a result of increased activity in our lawsuit against Biorasi for terminating their agreement. The trial in that lawsuit has commenced and is expected to be completed by the end of August 2026.

Added

During the years ended April 30, 2026 and 2025, we incurred insurance expense of $236,000 and $259,000, respectively, which was primarily directors’ and officers’ insurance. The decrease in insurance expense was due to lower negotiated pricing with the same amount of coverage.

Removed

During the year ended April 30, 2024, we incurred $214,000 in research and development stock-based compensation expense related to stock option grants to consultants. No such expense was incurred during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2025. The decrease in research and development stock-based compensation expense for the year ended April 30, 2025, was a result of all vested stock options grants having been expensed.

Removed

During the years ended April 30, 2025 and 2024, we incurred other fees of $43,000 and $96,000, respectively, which were primarily comprised of scientific materials required for our clinical trials.

Removed

General and administrative expenses for the years ended April 30, 2025 and 2024 were $3.1 million and $3.5 million, respectively. As reflected in the table below, general and administrative expenses primarily consisted of the following expense categories: salary and benefits; professional fees; insurance; stock-based compensation expense; marketing fees; and Board fees. For the years ended April 30, 2025 and 2024, the remaining general and administrative expenses of $347,000 and $381,000, respectively, primarily consisted of payments for advertising and promotion, transfer agent fees, travel, and other office expenses, none of which is significant individually.

Removed

During the years ended April 30, 2025 and 2024, we incurred $1.0 million and $836,000, respectively, in employee-related expenses. As of April 30, 2025, we had four full-time and three part-time employees. The increase in salary and benefits expense was a result of higher bonuses earned during the year ended April 30, 2025.

Removed

During the years ended April 30, 2025 and 2024, we incurred professional fees of $618,000 and $736,000, respectively. During the year ended April 30, 2025, we incurred $243,000 in legal fees, $221,000 in audit and tax fees, $149,000 in investor relations and $5,000 in other professional fees. During the year ended April 30, 2024, we incurred $341,000 in audit and tax fees, $192,000 in investor relations, $104,000 in legal fees, $33,000 in related party consulting, $28,000 in Sarbanes-Oxley compliance fees and $38,000 in other professional fees.

Removed

During the years ended April 30, 2025 and 2024, we incurred insurance expense of $259,000 and $382,000, respectively, which was primarily directors and officers insurance. The decrease in insurance expense was due to lower negotiated pricing with the same amount of coverage.

Reworded

During the years ended April 30, 20252026 and 2024,2025, we incurred stock-based compensation expense of $325,000$661,000 and $741,000,$325,000, respectively, related to stock option grants to executives,employees, employeesdirectors and consultants. The decreaseincrease in general and administrative stock-based compensation expense for the year ended April 30, 20252026, was a result of fewerthe vesting of newly granted stock options vesting during the period compared to the prior year period.options.

Reworded

Our inability to continue as a going concern could have a negative impact on our company, including our ability to obtain needed financing. We intend to finance our future development activities and our working capital needs largely through the sale of equity securities with some additional funding from other sources, including debt financing, until such time as funds provided by operations are sufficient to fund working capital requirements. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern. As of April 30, 2025,2026, we had cash of $3.9 million$711,000 and an accumulated deficit of $58.5$67.3 million. We have incurred recurring losses and reported lossesa loss for the year ended April 30, 20252026 totaling $4.5$8.8 million. In the past, we have financed our operations principally through sales of equity securities and debt instruments.

Added

At-the-Market Offering

Added

See Note 9 – Equity Transactions in the notes to the financial statements for a description of our fundraising activities.

Removed

On September 8, 2023, we entered into an At-the-Market Issuance Sales Agreement with Ascendiant Capital Markets, LLC (“Ascendiant”), as sales agent to sell shares of our Common Stock, having an aggregate offering price of up to approximately $9.8 million from time to time, through an “at the market offering” (the “ATM Offering”) as defined in Rule 415 under the Securities Act. On September 8, 2023, we filed a prospectus supplement with the SEC relating to the offer and sale of up to approximately $9.8 million in shares of Common Stock in the ATM Offering.

Removed

During the year ended April 30, 2024, we sold an aggregate of 11,964 shares of Common Stock pursuant to the ATM Offering for proceeds of $1.3 million. On May 6, 2024, we terminated our ATM Offering.

Removed

On October 3, 2024, we entered into a new At-the-Market Issuance Sales Agreement with Ascendiant, as sales agent to sell shares of our Common Stock, having an aggregate offering price of up to approximately $6.5 million from time to time, through an “at the market offering” (the “New ATM Offering”) as defined in Rule 415 under the Securities Act. On October 3, 2024, we filed a prospectus supplement with the SEC relating to the offer and sale of up to approximately $6.5 million in shares of Common Stock in the New ATM Offering.

Removed

During the year ended April 30, 2025, we sold an aggregate of 235,904 shares of Common Stock pursuant to the New ATM Offering for proceeds of $2.7 million. On April 7, 2025, we terminated our New ATM Offering.

Removed

Series B Preferred Financing

Removed

On January 31, 2024, we and Ault Lending entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “AL SPA”) for the purchase of up to 6,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase shares up to 66,667 shares of Common Stock. The AL SPA provided that Ault Lending could have purchased up to $6 million of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock in one or more closings. Ault Lending had the right to purchase up to $2 million of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, on or before March 31, 2024, and the right to purchase up to $4 million of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock after March 31, 2024, but on or before March 31, 2025 (the “Termination Date”). The final closing did not occur prior to the Termination Date and the AL SPA automatically terminated.

Removed

Between January 31, 2024 and April 29, 2024, we sold an aggregate of 2,100 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase 23,333 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $108.00, for a total purchase price of $2.1 million. The purchase price was paid by the cancellation of $1.15 million of cash advances made by Ault Lending to us between November 9, 2023 and January 31, 2024 and a subscription receivable of $70,000 and further cash proceeds of $880,000.

Removed

The Series B Convertible Preferred Stock has a stated value of $1,000 per share (“Series B Stated Value”) and does not accrue dividends. Each share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into a number of shares of common stock determined by dividing the Series B Stated Value by $10.00 (the “Series B Conversion Price”). The Series B Conversion Price is subject to adjustment in the event of an issuance of common stock at a price per share lower than the Series B Conversion Price then in effect, as well as upon customary stock splits, stock dividends, combinations or similar events. The holders of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to vote with the common stock as a single class on an as-converted basis, subject to applicable law provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law and Nasdaq, provided however, that for purposes of complying with Nasdaq regulations, the conversion price, for purposes of determining the number of votes the holder of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is entitled to cast, shall not be lower than $8.73 (the “Voting Floor Price”), which represents the closing sale price of the common stock on the trading day immediately prior to the date of execution of the AL SPA. The Voting Floor Price shall be adjusted for stock dividends, stock splits, stock combinations and other similar transactions.

Removed

The warrants have an exercise price of $12.00 (the “Series B Exercise Price”) and become exercisable on the first business day after the six-month anniversary of issuance (the “Series B Initial Exercise Date”) and have a five-year term, expiring on the fifth anniversary of the Series B Initial Exercise Date. The Series B Exercise Price is subject to adjustment in the event of an issuance of common stock at a price per share lower than the Series B Exercise Price then in effect, as well as upon customary stock splits, stock dividends, combinations or similar events.

Removed

Series A Preferred Financing

Removed

On May 8, 2024, we and Orchid Finance, LLC (“Orchid”), entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Orchid SPA”) for the purchase of up to 2,500 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Convertible Preferred Stock”) and warrants to purchase shares up to 277,778 shares of common stock in several tranche closings.

Removed

Between May 10, 2024 and September 11, 2024, we sold an aggregate of 800 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 71,109 shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $112.50, for a total purchase price of $8.0 million. The purchase price was paid by the surrender and cancellation of a term note issued by us to Orchid of $311,356, consisting of $310,000 of principal and $1,356 of accrued and unpaid interest, $200,000 discount and net cash of $7.5 million.

Removed

Pursuant to the Orchid SPA, Orchid had agreed to purchase the remaining 1,700 Preferred Shares on each monthly anniversary of the effectiveness of a registration statement until all remaining 1,700 Preferred Shares had been sold (“Milestones”). Orchid had the ability to invest any amount in its sole discretion in advance of the Milestone dates. In the event that the average closing price of the Common Stock during the three trading days preceding the date of a tranche closing was not equal to or greater than $22.50 a share (the “Floor Price”), then the applicable closing would be delayed until such time as the price meet the required threshold. We agreed to pay Ault Lending an origination fee of five percent (5%) of the total gross proceeds we receive from Orchid upon each purchase of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. We also agreed to pay Orchid a fee of $100,000 upon the first closing, which occurred on May 10, 2024, and on the closing which occurred on August 21, 2024.

Removed

The Series A Convertible Preferred Stock had a stated value of $10,000 per share (“Series A Stated Value”) and accrued dividends at the rate of 15% per annum, payable quarterly in arrears in cash or paid-in-kind shares, in Orchid’s sole discretion. Each share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock was convertible into a number of shares of Common Stock determined by dividing the Series A Stated Value by (y) the greater of (i) the Floor Price and (ii) the lesser of (A) $135.00 and (B) 80% of the lowest closing price of our Common Stock during the three trading days immediately prior to the date of conversion into conversion shares (the “Series A Conversion Price”). The Series A Conversion Price was subject to adjustment in the event of an issuance of Common Stock at a price per share lower than the Series A Conversion Price then in effect, as well as upon customary stock splits, stock dividends, combinations or similar events.

Removed

The warrants had an exercise price of $112.50 (the “Series A Exercise Price”) and were exercisable upon issuance and had a five-year term, expiring on the fifth anniversary of issuance. The Series A Exercise Price were subject to adjustment in the event of an issuance of Common Stock at a price per share lower than the Series A Exercise Price then in effect, as well as upon customary stock splits, stock dividends, combinations or similar events. The warrants were exercisable on a cashless basis in the event that there is not then an effective resale registration statement for the Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants.

Removed

During the year ended April 30, 2025, Orchid converted 712.0133 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock into 420,809 shares of Common Stock.

Removed

On February 28, 2025, we and Orchid terminated the Orchid SPA and entered into the Securities Purchase and Exchange Agreement (the “Orchid SPEA”). With the termination, 97.7511 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock were converted to 97.7511 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase 71,111 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $112.50 issued were cancelled.

Removed

Series C Preferred Financing

Removed

On February 28, 2025, we and Orchid entered into the Orchid SPEA for the purchase of up to 500 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in several tranche closings and warrants to purchase shares up to 111,111 shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $8.29 (the “Series C Exercise Price”) and are exercisable upon issuance and have a five-year term, expiring on the fifth anniversary of issuance. The Series C Exercise Price is subject to adjustment in the event of an issuance of Common Stock at a price per share lower than the Series C Exercise Price then in effect, as well as upon customary stock splits, stock dividends, combinations or similar events. In addition, 97.7511 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock were converted to 97.7511 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock.

Removed

Between April 28, 2025 and June 13, 2025, we sold an aggregate of 500 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $5 million. Effective June 13, 2025, the Orchid SPEA was terminated as all the shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock were sold.

Removed

The registration statement registering for resale the shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and exercise of the warrants was declared effective on April 8, 2025. In addition, we agreed to use our best efforts to hold a meeting of our stockholders within 90 days of the execution date of the Orchid SPEA for purposes of seeking stockholder approval of the issuance of all the shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and the exercise of the warrants in excess of the “Nasdaq Limit”, which is 19.99% of the shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding on the execution date of the Orchid SPEA. We held our annual meeting of stockholders on April 25, 2025, at which time, the stockholders approved the issuance of all the shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and the exercise of the warrants in excess of the “Nasdaq Limit”.

Removed

The Series C Convertible Preferred Stock has a stated value of $10,000 per share (“Series C Stated Value”) and accrued dividends at the rate of 15% per annum, payable quarterly in arrears in cash or paid-in-kind shares, in Orchid’s sole discretion. Each share of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into a number of shares of Common Stock determined by dividing the Series C Stated Value by (y) the greater of (i) $0.90 per share (“Series C Floor Price”) and (ii) the lesser of (A) $135.00 and (B) 80% of the lowest closing price of our Common Stock during the three trading days immediately prior to the date of conversion into conversion shares (the “Series C Conversion Price”). The Series C Conversion Price was subject to adjustment in the event of an issuance of Common Stock at a price per share lower than the Series C Conversion Price then in effect, as well as upon customary stock splits, stock dividends, combinations or similar events. The holders of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock were entitled to vote with the Common Stock as a single class on an as-converted basis, subject to applicable law provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law and Nasdaq, provided however, that for purposes of complying with Nasdaq regulations, the conversion price, for purposes of determining the number of votes the holder of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock is entitled to cast, shall not be lower than $7.5375 (the “Series C Voting Floor Price”), which represents the closing sale price of the Common Stock on the trading day immediately prior to the date of execution of the Orchid SPEA. The Series C Voting Floor Price shall be adjusted for stock dividends, stock splits, stock combinations and other similar transactions.

Removed

During the year ended April 30, 2025, Orchid converted 23.9712 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock into 44,444 shares of Common Stock. From May 1, 2025 to July 22, 2025, subsequent to our fiscal year end, Orchid converted 575.7176 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock into 2,117,699 shares of Common Stock.

Showing the first 60 of 66 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-09-10 (period ending 2026-07-31) with 10-Q filed 2026-03-11 (period ending 2026-01-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

0new paragraphs
0removed paragraphs
0reworded paragraphs
134 → 134words in section

The section in the latest 10-Q reads in full:

The risks described in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in our 2026 Annual Report on Form 10-K, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and the trading price of our Common Stock could decline. These risk factors do not identify all risks that we face; our operations could also be affected by factors that are not presently known to us or that we currently consider to be immaterial to our operations. Due to risks and uncertainties, known and unknown, our past financial results may not be a reliable indicator of future performance and historical trends should not be used to anticipate results or trends in future periods. The Risk Factors section of our 2026 Annual Report on Form 10-K remains current in all material respects.

No wording changes found in this section (only numbers or dates changed in 1 paragraph).

Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 1 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

11new paragraphs
26removed paragraphs
30reworded paragraphs
4,423 → 3,636words in section

New heading “Professional Fees”

New heading “Professional Fees”

Removed heading “Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended January 31, 2026 and 2025”

Removed heading “Research and Development Expenses”

Removed heading “Clinical Trial Fees”

Removed heading “Other Research and Development Expenses”

Removed heading “General and Administrative Expenses”

Removed heading “Salaries and Benefits”

Removed heading “Insurance Expense”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Reworded topics: litigation, lawsuit

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

During the three months ended JanuaryJuly 31, 2026 and 2025, we incurred professional fees of $337,000$1.4 million and $62,000,$333,000, respectively. During the three months ended JanuaryJuly 31, 31, 2026, we incurred $295,000$1.3 million in legal fees, $24,000$85,000 in audit fees, $16,000$19,000 in tax preparation fees and $6,000 in investor relationrelations fees. fees and $1,000 in consulting fees. During the three months ended JanuaryJuly 31, 2025, we incurred $35,000$183,000 in legal fees, $22,000$78,000 in audit feesfees, and $5,000$60,000 in investor relations fees and $12,000 in tax preparation fees. The increase in professional fees was due mainly to higher legal, audit and tax preparation fees, partially offset by lower investor relations fees. The increase in legal fees, whichfees was a result of litigationincreased activity in our lawsuit against Biorasi for terminating their agreement. The trial in that lawsuit has commenced and is expected to be completed by the CRO from the terminationend of December our ALZN002 clinical trial.2026.
see in full comparison
Removed text
“Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended January 31, 2026 and 2025”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: fine
“Lithium is a commonly prescribed drug for manic episodes in BD type 1 as well as maintenance therapy of BD in patients with a history of manic episodes. Lithium is also prescribed off label for MDD, BD and treatment of PTSD, among other disorders. Lithium was the first mood stabilizer approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and is still a first-line treatment option (considered the “gold standard”) but is underutilized perhaps because of the need for TDM. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: litigation
“During the nine months ended January 31, 2026 and 2025, we incurred professional fees of $1.0 million and $433,000, respectively. During the nine months ended January 31, 2026, we incurred $818,000 in legal fees, $126,000 in audit fees, $66,000 in investor relation fees, $32,000 in tax preparation fees and $9,000 in consulting fees. During the nine months ended January 31, 2025, we incurred $173,000 in audit fees, $144,000 in legal fees, $92,000 in investor relation fees, $22,000 in tax preparation fees and $2,000 in consulting fees. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“Other Research and Development Expenses”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“General and Administrative Expenses”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (67)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 1 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

We intend to develop and commercialize therapeutics and vaccines that are better than existing treatments and have the potential to significantly improve improve the lives of individuals afflicted by Alzheimer’s, BD, MDD and PTSD. To achieve these goals, we are pursuing the following key business strategies:

Reworded

On May 5, 2022, we initiated a multiple-dose, steady-state, double-blind, ascending dose safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic clinical trial of AL001 in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s and healthy subjects. We completed the Phase IIA clinical trial in March 2023 and announced positive topline data in June 2023, followed by the full data set in October 2024.2023.

Reworded

We announced that we successfully identified a maximum tolerated dose (“MTD”) for development of AL001 from a multiple-ascending dose study as assessed by an independent safety review committee. This dose, providing lithium at a lithium carbonate equivalent dose of 240 mg 3-times daily,daily (“TID”), is designed to be unlikely to require lithium therapeutic drug monitoring (“TDM”). Also, this MTD is risk-mitigated for the purpose of treating fragile populations, such as Alzheimer’s patients.

Removed

Lithium is a commonly prescribed drug for manic episodes in BD type 1 as well as maintenance therapy of BD in patients with a history of manic episodes. Lithium is also prescribed off label for MDD, BD and treatment of PTSD, among other disorders. Lithium was the first mood stabilizer approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and is still a first-line treatment option (considered the “gold standard”) but is underutilized perhaps because of the need for TDM. Lithium was the first drug that required TDM by regulatory authorities in product labelling because the effective and safe range of therapeutic drug blood concentrations is narrow and well defined for treatment of BD when using lithium salts. Excursions above this range can be toxic, and below can impair effectiveness. Existing lithium drugs suffer from chronic toxicity, poor physicochemical properties, and poor brain bioavailability. Alzamend’s novel AL001 formulation, a lithium-salicylate/L-proline engineered ionic cocrystal, is designed to overcome the toxicities associated with conventional lithium salts, promising a next-generation lithium treatment with an enhanced safety profile and advantageous distribution to brain and brain structures.

Reworded

Based on the results from our Phase IIA MAD study, we plan to initiate five clinical trials to determine relative increased lithium levels in the brain compared to a marketed lithium salt for healthy subject and patients diagnosed with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s, BD, MDD and PTSD, based on published mouse studies that predict that lithium can be given at lower doses for equivalent therapeutic benefit when treating with AL001. For example, the goal is to replace the amount of lithium needed for maintenance treatment of BD with a clinically relevant, lower AL001 lithium carbonate equivalent lithium dose. Such lithium dose mitigation could redefine the landscape of neuropsychiatric, neurodegenerative, neurodegenerative, and neurological treatment practices. In August 2024, we announced that we had partnered with Massachusetts General Hospital to serve as the contract research organization (“CRO”) for these clinical trials.

Added

In August 2024, we announced a partnership with Massachusetts General Hospital (“MGH”) and Harvard Medical School to conduct five Phase II imaging clinical trials. The purpose of these trials is to assess the comparative increase in lithium levels within the brain and its structures as opposed to a commonly marketed lithium salt among healthy subjects and patients afflicted with Alzheimer’s, BD, MDD and PTSD.

Added

In November 2024, we announced a full data set from a nonclinical study comparing brain and plasma lithium exposures between AL001 and lithium carbonate in Alzheimer’s transgenic mice. This study was a precursor to the five clinical trials and showed that AL001 exhibited consistently higher lithium concentrations in brain tissues, particularly at lower doses, compared to lithium carbonate.

Added

For these clinical trials, we partnered with Tesla Dynamic Coils BV to create a head coil to enable whole-brain imaging of lithium with remarkable resolution, allowing precise quantification within brain structures. The coil will be used to help identify the disease-specific target doses of AL001 that improve the balance of safety and efficacy compared to lithium carbonate. The coil will also be used to scan the entire brain, helping us clearly identify the different structures and important areas necessary for understanding how lithium works and moves within the brain. We announced completion of the head coil in February 2025.

Added

In May 2025, we announced the initiation, enrollment and dosing of the first patient for the healthy human patients. This clinical trial has the following objectives:

Added

In November 2025, we announced the completion of the clinical portion of this study and reported pharmacokinetics topline data in March 2026, with the following results: (1) Bioequivalence Confirmed: AL001 delivered 101% of total lithium blood exposure and 97% of peak lithium levels vs. standard lithium carbonate; (2) Superior Brain Penetration: AL001 showed numerically higher lithium concentrations in all measured brain regions, including whole brain; and (3) Faster Brain Uptake: AL001 reached peak brain concentration in 6.7 hours vs. 8.4 hours for standard lithium carbonate. In April 2026, we announced pharmacodynamic topline data of the healthy human subjects with the following results:

Added

Full pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic results are expected in the fourth quarter of 2026.

Added

In March 2026, we announced the initiation of the Phase II Clinical Trial of AL001 “Lithium in Brain” Study in Patients with BD and expect to report topline data in the fourth quarter of 2026. The clinical trials for treatment of patients with MDD and PTSD are expected to commence in the fourth quarter of 2026, followed by Alzheimer’s in the first quarter of 2027. These projected timelines reflect our commitment to advancing our clinical development programs across multiple neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative indications.

Removed

On November 19, 2024, we announced a final full data set from a nonclinical study comparing brain and plasma lithium exposures between AL001 and lithium carbonate in Alzheimer’s transgenic mice. The study was conducted at the University of South Florida and the bioanalytical procedures for determination of lithium concentration in the brain and plasma samples were conducted under good laboratory practice standards by Sannova Analytical LLC. The study involved administering AL001, a good manufacturing practices-quality active pharmaceutical ingredient (“API”) to 5XFAD mice, a recognized model for Alzheimer’s research, to compare its effects against lithium carbonate, an FDA approved and marketed API. Mice received either high or low doses scaled to humans of both AL001 and lithium carbonate over a 14-day period to observe pharmacokinetic steady-state drug conditions. On the 15th day, the mice were analyzed to assess how the treatments affected lithium concentrations in different brain regions and in their plasma.

Removed

Based on the study, neither treatments had a negative impact on the mice's body weight or clinical signs during the treatment period. AL001 showed lower plasma lithium levels than lithium carbonate, reducing the risk of adverse systemic effects, suggesting an expansion for safety of lithium’s therapeutic index. Further, AL001 showed consistently higher lithium concentrations in brain tissues, particularly at lower doses, compared to lithium carbonate. Finally, the study found that different brain regions absorb and retain lithium differently. This means treatments can potentially be tailored to target specific brain areas, allowing for more precise treatment of various brain-related conditions when applied in human studies.

Removed

These results highlight the potential clinical advantages of AL001 for conditions like Alzheimer’s, BD, MDD and PTSD at low doses. By reducing the systemic burden, AL001 could lessen the risk of side effects such as thyroid and kidney complications often associated with extant lithium therapies. This positions AL001 as a promising candidate for safer long-term treatment options, without the need for TDM. This innovation is specifically designed to address the needs of fragile populations, such as elderly and Alzheimer’s patients, by offering a potentially more efficient and safer alternative to existing treatments.

Removed

The dosing level identified as optimal in this robust nonclinical study will serve as the foundation for advancing the evaluation of AL001 in the comprehensive ‘Lithium in Brain’ Phase II clinical trials. These trials, conducted in collaboration with Massachusetts General Hospital, will encompass a diverse cohort of both healthy subjects and patients diagnosed with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease, BD, MDD and PTSD. In May 2025, we began the trial and dosed the first healthy subject. In November 2025, we announced that we completed the clinical portion of the Phase II study in healthy human subjects and expect to report topline data in the first quarter of 2026.

Reworded

On September 28, 2022, we submitted an Investigational New Drug (“IND”) application to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) for ALZN002 and received a “study may proceed” letter on October 31, 2022. The product candidate is an immunotherapy vaccine designed to treat mild to moderate dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. ALZN002 is a proprietary “active” immunotherapy product, which means it is produced by each patient’s immune system. It consists of autologous dendritic cells (“DCs”) that are activated activated white blood cells taken from each individual patient so that they can be engineered outside of the body to attack Alzheimer’s-related amyloid-beta proteins. These DCs are pulsed with a novel amyloid-beta peptide,peptide E22W,(E22W) designed to bolster the ability of the patient’s immune system to combat Alzheimer’s, with the goal being to foster tolerance to treatment for safety purposes while stimulating the immune system to reduce the brain’s beta-amyloid protein burden, resulting in reduced Alzheimer’s signs and symptoms. Compared to passive immunization treatment approaches that use foreign blood products (such as monoclonal antibodies), active immunization with ALZN002 is anticipated to offer a more robust and long-lasting effect on the clearance of amyloid. This could provide a safer approach due to its reliance on autologous immune components, using each individual patient’s own white blood cells rather than foreign cells and/or blood products.

Reworded

On April 3, 2023, we announced the initiation of a Phase I/IIA clinical trial for ALZN002 to treat mild to moderate dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. The purpose of this trial is to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of multiple ascending doses of ALZN002 compared with that of a placebo in 20-30 subjects with mild to moderate morbidity. The primary goal of this clinical trial is to determine an appropriate dose of ALZN002 for treatment of patients with Alzheimer’s in a larger Phase IIB efficacy and safety clinical trial. On February 13, 2024, we received notice from the company we engaged as CRO, Biorasi, LLC (“Biorasi”), thatthe Biorasicompany wasformerly engaged as our contract research organization (“CRO”), terminating our contract with them.Biorasi. We are currently pursuing the engagement of a replacement CRO. Due to the scientific and operational complexities of the ALZN002 trial, along with the limited number of CROs with the expertise and capacity to complete the trial, we have experienced a delay in engaging a new CRO. We do not expect to restart this trial until the second quarter of 2027.

Reworded

The continuation of our current plan of operations with respect to initiatingcompleting our IND applications and conducting the series of human clinical trials for each of our therapeutics requires us to raise additional capital to fund our operations.

Reworded

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended JanuaryJuly 31, 2026 and 2025

Reworded

The following table summarizes the results of our operations for the three months ended JanuaryJuly 31, 2026 and 2025:

Reworded

We currently have only two product candidates, AL001 and ALZN002. These products are in the clinical stage of development and will require extensive clinical study, review and evaluation, regulatory review and approval, significant marketing effortsefforts, whether we or a third party conducts such efforts, and substantial investment before either or both of them, and any respective successors, will provide us with any revenue. We did not generate any revenues during the three months ended JanuaryJuly 31, 2026 and 2025, and we do not anticipate that we will generate revenue for the foreseeable future.

Reworded

Research and development expenses for the three months ended JanuaryJuly 31, 2026 and 2025 were $1.3$1.1 million and $447,000,$1.7 million, respectively. As reflected in the table below, research and development expenses primarily consisted of professional fees and clinical trial fees:

Added

Professional Fees

Reworded

During the three months ended JanuaryJuly 31, 2026 and 2025, we incurred professional fees of $255,000$146,000 and $135,000,$74,000, respectively, which were primarily comprised of professional fees attributed to various types of scientific services, including FDA consulting services. The increase relates to higher professional fees required to support the current and upcoming clinical trial activities.

Added

During the three months ended July 31, 2026, we incurred $6,000 of research and development stock-based compensation expense related to stock option grants to consultants. No such expense was incurred during the three months ended July 31, 2025. The increase in research and development stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended July 31, 2026 was a result of the vesting of stock options.

Reworded

During the three months ended JanuaryJuly 31, 2026 and 2025, we incurred clinical trial fees of $1.0 million$929,000 and $298,000,$1.7 million, respectively. The increase in clinicalClinical trial fees relates tofor the AL001three months ended July 31, 2026 were for our Phase IIB clinical study on healthy humanBD subjects conducted with Massachusetts General Hospital,MGH, which was completedwe expect to complete in NovemberSeptember 2026. Clinical trial fees for the three months ended July 31, 2025 were for our Phase IIA brain imaging study with MGH which completed during the three months ended July 31, 2025.

Reworded

During the three months ended JanuaryJuly 31, 2026 and 2025, we incurred other fees of $7,000$5,000 and $14,000,$6,000, respectively, which were primarily comprised of scientific materials required for our clinical trials.

Reworded

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended JanuaryJuly 31, 2026 and 2025 were $919,000$1.9 million and $590,000,$959,000, respectively. As reflected in the table below, general and administrative expenses primarily consisted of the following expense categories: salaries and benefits; professional fees; insurance; stock-based compensation expense; marketing fees; and board of director fees. For the three months ended JanuaryJuly 31, 2026 and 2025, the remaining general and administrative expenses of $111,000$162,000 and $116,000,$102,000, respectively, primarily consisted of payments for filing fees, transfer agent fees, travel and entertainment and other office expenses, none of which was significant individually.

Reworded

During each of the three months ended ended JanuaryJuly 31, 2026 and 2025, we incurred salaries and benefits of $310,000$222,000 and $227,000,$228,000, respectively. TheWe increasereduced inour salariesheadcount andby benefitsone waspart-time due mainly to higher bonuses paid.employee. As of JanuaryJuly 31, 2026, we had four full-time and two part-time employees.

Added

Professional Fees

Reworded

During the three months ended JanuaryJuly 31, 2026 and 2025, we incurred professional fees of $337,000$1.4 million and $62,000,$333,000, respectively. During the three months ended JanuaryJuly 31, 31, 2026, we incurred $295,000$1.3 million in legal fees, $24,000$85,000 in audit fees, $16,000$19,000 in tax preparation fees and $6,000 in investor relationrelations fees. fees and $1,000 in consulting fees. During the three months ended JanuaryJuly 31, 2025, we incurred $35,000$183,000 in legal fees, $22,000$78,000 in audit feesfees, and $5,000$60,000 in investor relations fees and $12,000 in tax preparation fees. The increase in professional fees was due mainly to higher legal, audit and tax preparation fees, partially offset by lower investor relations fees. The increase in legal fees, whichfees was a result of litigationincreased activity in our lawsuit against Biorasi for terminating their agreement. The trial in that lawsuit has commenced and is expected to be completed by the CRO from the terminationend of December our ALZN002 clinical trial.2026.

Reworded

During the three months ended JanuaryJuly 31, 2026 and 2025, we incurred insurance expenseexpenses of $59,000$56,000 and $60,000, respectively, which waswere primarily directors’ and officers’ insurance.

Reworded

During the three months ended JanuaryJuly 31, 2026 and 2025, we incurred general and administrative stock-based compensation expense of $9,000$71,000 and $81,000,$43,000, respectively, related to stock option grants and restricted stock grants to executives, employees and consultants. The decreaseincrease in stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended JanuaryJuly 31, 2026,2026 was a result of fewera greater number of stock optionsoption vesting during the period compared to the prior year period.vesting.

Reworded

During the three months ended JanuaryJuly 31, 2026,2025, we incurred marketing fees of $50,000,$150,000, which primarily represented expenses related to the marketing and branding of our company. We did not incur any marketing fees forduring the three months ended JanuaryJuly 31, 2025.2026.

Removed

Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended January 31, 2026 and 2025

Removed

The following table summarizes the results of our operations for the nine months ended January 31, 2026 and 2025:

Removed

Revenue

Removed

We currently have only two product candidates, AL001 and ALZN002. These products are in the clinical stage of development and will require extensive clinical study, review and evaluation, regulatory review and approval, significant marketing efforts and substantial investment before either or both of them, and any respective successors, will provide us with any revenue. We did not generate any revenues during the nine months ended January 31, 2026 and 2025, and we do not anticipate that we will generate revenue for the foreseeable future.

Removed

Research and Development Expenses

Removed

Research and development expenses for the nine months ended January 31, 2026 and 2025 were $3.2 million and $1.0 million, respectively. As reflected in the table below, research and development expenses primarily consisted of professional fees and clinical trial fees:

Removed

During the nine months ended January 31, 2026 and 2025, we incurred professional fees of $460,000 and $500,000, respectively, which were primarily comprised of professional fees attributed to various types of scientific services, including FDA consulting services. The decrease relates to lower professional fees required to support the previous and upcoming clinical trial activities.

Removed

Clinical Trial Fees

Removed

During the nine months ended January 31, 2026 and 2025, we incurred clinical trial fees of $2.7 million and $422,000, respectively. The increase in clinical trial fees relates to our AL001 Phase IIB clinical study on healthy human subjects conducted with Massachusetts General Hospital, which was completed in November 2025.

Removed

Other Research and Development Expenses

Removed

During the nine months ended January 31, 2026 and 2025, we incurred other fees of $19,000 and $42,000, respectively, which were primarily comprised of scientific materials required for our clinical trials.

Removed

General and Administrative Expenses

Removed

General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended January 31, 2026 and 2025 were $2.7 million and $2.4 million, respectively. As reflected in the table below, general and administrative expenses primarily consisted of the following expense categories: salaries and benefits; professional fees; insurance; stock-based compensation expense; marketing fees; and board of director fees. For the nine months ended January 31, 2026 and 2025, the remaining general and administrative expenses of $297,000 and $262,000, respectively, primarily consisted of payments for filing fees, transfer agent fees, travel and entertainment and other office expenses, none of which was significant individually.

Removed

Salaries and Benefits

Removed

During the nine months ended January 31, 2026 and 2025, we incurred salaries and benefits of $761,000 and $780,000, respectively. The decrease in salaries and benefits was due mainly to lower bonuses. As of January 31, 2026, we had four full-time and two part-time employees.

Removed

During the nine months ended January 31, 2026 and 2025, we incurred professional fees of $1.0 million and $433,000, respectively. During the nine months ended January 31, 2026, we incurred $818,000 in legal fees, $126,000 in audit fees, $66,000 in investor relation fees, $32,000 in tax preparation fees and $9,000 in consulting fees. During the nine months ended January 31, 2025, we incurred $173,000 in audit fees, $144,000 in legal fees, $92,000 in investor relation fees, $22,000 in tax preparation fees and $2,000 in consulting fees. The increase in professional fees was due mainly to higher legal and tax preparation fees, partially offset by lower audit and investor relations fees. The increase in legal fees, which accounted for a significant proportion of the increase, was a result of litigation against the CRO from the termination of our ALZN002 clinical trial.

Removed

Insurance Expense

Removed

During the nine months ended January 31, 2026 and 2025, we incurred insurance expense of $177,000 and $199,000, respectively, which was primarily directors’ and officers’ insurance.

Removed

During the nine months ended January 31, 2026 and 2025, we incurred general and administrative stock-based compensation expense of $84,000 and $244,000, respectively, related to stock option grants and restricted stock grants to executives, employees and consultants. The decrease in stock-based compensation expense for the nine months ended January 31, 2026, was a result of fewer stock options vesting during the period compared to the prior year period.

Removed

Marketing Fees

Removed

During the nine months ended January 31, 2026 and 2025, we incurred marketing fees of $200,000 and $344,000, respectively, related to the marketing and branding of our company.

Reworded

The accompanying condensed financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern. We have incurred recurring net losses and our operations have not providedgenerated any cash flows. We believe that we will continue to incur operating and net losses each quarter until at least the time we begin significant deliveries of our products. We believe our current cash on hand is insufficient to fund our planned operations through one year after the date the condensed financial statements are issued. These factors create substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern for at least one year after the date that our condensed financial statements are issued.

Reworded

Our inability to continue as a going concern could have a negative impact on our company, particularly if we are unable to obtain neededthe requisite financing. We intend to finance our future development activities and our working capital needs largely through the sale of equity securities with some additional funding from other sources, including debt financing, until such time as funds provided by operations are sufficient to fund working capital requirements. Our condensed financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern. As of JanuaryJuly 31, 2026, we had cash of $2.7 million, working capital of $1.8 million, stockholders’ equity of $2.2$7.6 million and an accumulated deficit of $64.4$70.3 million. We have incurred recurring losses and reported losses for the three and nine months ended JanuaryJuly 31, 2026 totaling $2.2 million and $5.9 million, respectively.$3.0 million. In the past, we have financed our operations principally through salesissuances of equity securities and debt instruments.

Reworded

We will need to obtain substantial additional funding in the future for our clinical development activities and continuing operations. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on favorable terms, we would be forced to delay, reduce, or eliminate our research and development programs or future commercialization efforts. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:

Added

Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:

Showing the first 60 of 67 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

ALZN insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 3 Form 4 filings (1 insider, 1 trade date, 329,164 shares, about $329.3K) and open-market sales in 1 filing (1 insider, 1 trade date, 2,000 shares, about $3.1K). Net open-market shares: 327,164 (purchases minus sales); net value about $326.2K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2026-08-26Ault Milton C Iii
Director
Open-market sale 2,000$1.56 $3.1K0 SEC
2026-04-14Ault Milton C Iii
Director
Open-market purchase 2,000$1.03 $2.1K2,000 SEC
2026-04-14Ault Milton C Iii
Director
Open-market purchase 108,388$1.00 $108.4K116,648 SEC
2026-04-14Ault Milton C Iii
Director
Open-market purchase 2,000$1.03 $2.1K2,000 SEC
2026-04-14Ault Milton C Iii
Director
Open-market purchase 108,388$1.00 $108.4K116,648 SEC
2026-04-14Ault Milton C Iii
Director
Open-market purchase 108,388$1.00 $108.4K116,648 SEC

Well-known investors holding ALZN (13F)

None of the 59 investors we track reported a position in their latest 13F.

Coming soon: email alerts when ALZN files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.