Companies › AMAL

AMAL 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

Amalgamated Financial Corp. · Nasdaq · State Commercial Banks · CIK 1823608 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from Amalgamated Financial Corp.'s public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

6 / 4risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
0new risk-factor headings
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
23Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-03-05 (period ending 2025-12-31) with 10-K filed 2025-03-06 (period ending 2024-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

6new paragraphs
4removed paragraphs
30reworded paragraphs
13,296 → 12,588words in section

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: investigation, tariff, export control, sanction
“There have been, and may be in the future, changes with respect to U.S. and international trade policies, legislation, treaties and tariffs, embargoes, sanctions and other trade restrictions. Tariffs, retaliatory tariffs or other trade restrictions on products and materials that customers import or export, or a trade war or other related governmental actions related to tariffs, international trade agreements or policies or other trade restrictions have the potential to negatively impact our customers' costs, demand for their products, or the U.S. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: litigation, penalt, cybersecurity incident, breach

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

While we have not experienced any material breaches of information security,security breaches, such breaches may occur throughas a result of intentional or unintentionalinadvertent acts by thoseindividuals havingwith accessauthorized or gainingunauthorized access to our systems or to confidential information of us, our customers’customers, or counterparties’ confidential information,counterparties, including employees. InCybersecurity addition,risks increasesmay inincrease due to heightened criminal activity levels and sophistication, advancestechnological advances, newly discovered vulnerabilities (including in computer capabilities, new discoveries, vulnerabilities in third-partythird‑party technologies (includingsuch as browsers and operating systems), or other developments could result in a compromise or breach of the technology, processes and controls that we use to prevent fraudulent transactions and to protect data about us, our customers and underlying transactions, as well as the technology used by our customers to access our systems. Further, risk of cybersecurity incidents may increase with the political and economicgeopolitical instability or warfarewarfare, (including the Russia and Ukraine warconflict and reported cyber campaigns by Chinese hackers totargeting infiltrateU.S. computer networks associated with critical American infrastructure).infrastructure. We cannot be certainassure that the security measures we,we or processors,our haveprocessors in place to protect this sensitive datamaintain will be successfuleffective or sufficient to protect against all current andor emerging threatsthreats. designed to breach our systems or those of processors. Although we have developed, and continue to invest in, systems and processes that are designed to detect and prevent security breaches and cyber-attacks and regularly test our security, aA breach of our systems, or those of processors, could result in lossesfinancial to us or our customers;losses, loss of customers or business, reputational harm, business and/ordisruption, customers; damage to our reputation; the incurrence of additionalincreased expenses (including thenotification, cost of notification to consumers, credit monitoring and forensics, and feesremediation, and fines imposed by the card networks); disruption to our business; our inability to grow our online services or other businesses; additional, regulatory scrutiny or penalties;penalties, litigation, or ourother exposureadverse toconsequences, civil litigation and possible financial liability—any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditioncondition, and results of operations.
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: litigation, fine, penalt
“Fraudulent activity has taken many forms, ranging from check fraud, mechanical devices attached to ATM machines, social engineering and phishing attacks to obtain personal information or impersonation of our clients through the use of falsified or stolen credentials and debit card fraud. Additionally, an individual or business entity may properly identify themselves, particularly when banking online, yet seek to establish a business relationship for the purpose of perpetrating fraud. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: litigation, penalt, breach
“We are exposed to the risk of fraudulent activity, which continues to evolve in scope and sophistication. Fraud may take various forms, including check and debit card fraud, ATM tampering, phishing and other social engineering attacks, and the use of stolen or falsified credentials to impersonate customers. In addition, individuals or entities may properly identify themselves but seek to establish relationships for fraudulent purposes, and we may incur losses from fraud committed against third parties. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: downgrade, credit rating, interest rate

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Fiscal challenges facing the U.S. government, such as the downgrade of the sovereign credit ratings of the U.S. by Fitch Ratings, could have an adverse impact on value of investments in GSEs and on the financial markets, interest rates and economic conditions in the U.S. and worldwide. Federalfederal budget deficit concerns and the potential for political conflict over legislation to fund U.S. government operations and raise the U.S. government's debt limit may increase the possibility of a default by the U.S. government on its debt obligations, additional related credit-rating downgrades, or an economic recession in the U.S. A significant portion of our securities portfolio is invested in GSE securities. As a result of uncertain domestic political conditions, including potential future federal government shutdowns or the possibility of the federal government defaulting on its obligations for a period of time, investments in financial instruments issued or guaranteed by the federal government pose liquidity and credit risks.
see in full comparison
New text topics: tariff, sanction
“There have been, and may be in the future, changes with respect to U.S. and international trade policies, legislation, treaties and tariffs, embargoes, sanctions and other trade restrictions. In response to a February 2026 Supreme Court ruling that the President does not have authority to impose sweeping global tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the President signed an executive order imposing additional global tariffs. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (40)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 5 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Some elements of the business environment that affect our financial performance include short-term and long-term interest rates, the prevailing yield curve, inflation, monetary supply, fluctuations in the debt and equity capital markets, and the strength of the domestic economy and the local economies in the markets in which we operate. Unfavorable market conditions can result in a deterioration of the credit quality of borrowers, an increase in the number of loan delinquencies, defaults and charge-offs, foreclosures, additional provisions for credit losses, adverse asset values and a reduction in assets under management or administration. The majority of our loan portfolio is secured by real estate, 8.8%33.2% of which is multifamily and 7.3% of which is commercial real estate. A decline in real estate values can negatively impact our ability to recover our investment should the borrower become delinquent. Loans secured by stock or other collateral may be adversely impacted by a downturn in the economy and other factors that could reduce the recoverability of our investment. Unsecured loans are dependent on the solvency of the borrower, which can deteriorate, leaving us with a risk of loss. Unfavorable or uncertain economic and market conditions can be caused by declines in economic growth, business activity or investor or business confidence, limitations on the availability of or increases in the cost of credit and capital, increases in inflation or interest rates, high unemployment, natural disasters, epidemics and pandemics, state or local government insolvency, or a combination of these or other factors.

Reworded

There are continuing concerns related to, among other things, the level of U.S. government debt and fiscal actions that may be taken to address that debt, price fluctuations of key natural resources, U.S. intervention in Venezuela and its oil industry, U.S. military strikes and sanctions on Iran, the potential resurgence of economic and political tensions with China, the Russian invasion of Ukraine and increasing oil prices due to Russian supply disruptions, and the Israel-Hamas conflict, each of which may have a destabilizing effect on financial markets and economic activity. Economic pressure on consumers, including due to factors such as inflation and increased cost of goods due to tariffstariff structures on imports, as well as overall economic uncertainty may result in changes in consumer and business spending, borrowing and saving habits. These economic conditions and/or other negative developments in the domestic or international credit markets or economies may significantly affect the markets in which we do business, the value of our loans and investments, and our ongoing operations, costs and profitability. Declines in real estate values and sales volumes, high unemployment or underemployment, and inflation may also result in higher than expected loan delinquencies, increases in our levels of nonperforming and classified assets and a decline in demand for our products and services. These negative events may cause us to incur losses and may adversely affect our capital, liquidity and financial condition.

Reworded

In some cases, management of our risks depends upon the use of analytical and/or forecasting models, which, in turn, rely on assumptions and estimates. If the models used to mitigate these risks are inadequate, or the assumption or estimates are inaccurate or otherwise flawed, we may fail to adequately protect against risks and may incur losses. ArtificalArtificial Intelligence ("AI") models may amplify existing risks, given the increased complexity of financial modellingmodeling and the challenges in explaining the models.

Reworded

Fiscal challenges facing the U.S. government, such as the downgrade of the sovereign credit ratings of the U.S. by Fitch Ratings, could have an adverse impact on value of investments in GSEs and on the financial markets, interest rates and economic conditions in the U.S. and worldwide. Federalfederal budget deficit concerns and the potential for political conflict over legislation to fund U.S. government operations and raise the U.S. government's debt limit may increase the possibility of a default by the U.S. government on its debt obligations, additional related credit-rating downgrades, or an economic recession in the U.S. A significant portion of our securities portfolio is invested in GSE securities. As a result of uncertain domestic political conditions, including potential future federal government shutdowns or the possibility of the federal government defaulting on its obligations for a period of time, investments in financial instruments issued or guaranteed by the federal government pose liquidity and credit risks.

Added

There have been, and may be in the future, changes with respect to U.S. and international trade policies, legislation, treaties and tariffs, embargoes, sanctions and other trade restrictions. In response to a February 2026 Supreme Court ruling that the President does not have authority to impose sweeping global tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the President signed an executive order imposing additional global tariffs. It remains unclear whether and how federal agencies will enforce conflicting mandates on tariffs, and whether parties harmed by tariffs will have recourse against the federal government. Tariffs, retaliatory tariffs or other trade restrictions on products and materials that customers import or export, or a trade war or other related governmental actions related to tariffs, international trade agreements or policies or other trade restrictions continue to have the potential to negatively impact our customers' costs, demand for their products, or the U.S. economy or certain sectors thereof and, thus, could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Added

To the extent this uncertainty in U.S. trade policy and other changes in the global political environment have a negative impact on us, our customers or on the markets in which we operate, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely impacted.

Removed

There have been, and may be in the future, changes with respect to U.S. and international trade policies, legislation, treaties and tariffs, embargoes, sanctions and other trade restrictions. Tariffs, retaliatory tariffs or other trade restrictions on products and materials that customers import or export, or a trade war or other related governmental actions related to tariffs, international trade agreements or policies or other trade restrictions have the potential to negatively impact our customers' costs, demand for their products, or the U.S. economy or certain sectors thereof and, thus, could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. The U.S. recently has threatened or imposed tariffs on imports including aluminum, steel, and energy products from major trading partners including China, Mexico and Canada. In response, these trading partners have threatened or imposed retaliatory tariffs on certain U.S. imports and announced investigations into U.S.-based companies. Disputes over trade, flows of undocumented immigrants, fentanyl, Taiwanese independence and China’s expanding military presence may result in additional tariffs, sanctions and trade restrictions. As a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the U.S. has imposed material financial and economic sanctions and export controls against certain Russian organizations and/or individuals, with similar actions either implemented or planned by the European Union (“EU”) and the U.K. and other jurisdictions. Additionally, an armed conflict involving Hamas and Israel, as well as further escalation of tensions between Israel and various countries in the Middle East and North Africa, may cause additional detrimental effects on the global economy, including capital markets. To the extent changes in the global political environment have a negative impact on us or on the markets in which we operate, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely impacted.

Reworded

Although our asset-liability management strategy is designed to control and mitigate exposure to the risks related to changes in the general level of market interest rates, those rates are affected by many factors outside of our control, including inflation, recession, unemployment, money supply, international disorder, instability in domestic and foreign financial markets and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies, particularly the Federal Open Market Committee ("FOMC") of the Federal Reserve. Adverse changes in the U.S. monetary policy or in economic conditions could materially and adversely affect us. On January 31,28, 20252026 the FOMC issued a statement that it decided to maintain short-term interest rates at a range of 4.25%3.5% to 4.50%,3.75%, and it now projects just two interestfuture rate cutschanges inwill 2025,be compareddata todependent; earlierimplying projectionsthey are holding rates constant for fourthe rateimmediate cuts.future. We could experience net interest margin compression if our rates on our interest earning assets fail to increase in tandem with rates on our interest-bearing liabilities. We could experience net interest margin compression if our rates on our interest bearing liabilities fail to decrease in tandem with rates on our interest earning assets. See Impact of Inflation and Changing Interest Rates under Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." Similarly, if short-term interest rates increase and long-term interest rates do not increase, or increase but at a slower rate, we could experience net interest margin compression as our rates on interest earning assets decline measured relative to rates on our interest-bearing liabilities. Any such occurrence could have a material adverse effect on our net interest income and on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Reworded

As of December 31, 2024,2025, the fair value of our investment securities portfolio was approximately $3.18$3.22 billion. Factors beyond our control could significantly affect the fair value of these securities. These factors include, but are not limited to, changes in market conditions including changes in interest rates or spreads, changes in the credit profile of individual securities, changes in prepayment behavior of individual securities, rating agency actions in respect of the securities, or adverse regulatory action. Any of these factors, among others, could cause other-than-temporary impairments, or OTTI, and realized and/or unrealized losses in future periods and declines in earnings and/or other comprehensive income (loss), which could materially and adversely affect our assets, business, cash flow, condition (financial or otherwise), liquidity, results of operations and prospects. The process for determining whether impairment of a security ishas experienced an OTTI usually requires complex, subjective judgments about the future financial performance and liquidity of the issuer, any collateral underlying the security as well as our intent and ability to hold the security for a sufficient period of time to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value in order to assess the probability of receiving all contractual principal and interest payments on the security. Our failure to assess any impairments or losses with respect to our securities could have a material adverse effect on our assets, business, cash flow, condition (financial or otherwise), liquidity, results of operations and prospects.

Reworded

We must effectively manage credit risk. As a lender, we are exposed to the risk that our borrowers will be unable to repay their loans according to their terms, and that the collateral securing repayment of their loans, if any, may not be sufficient to ensure repayment. In addition, there are risks inherent in making any loan, including risks relating to proper loan underwriting, risks resulting from changes in economic and industry conditions and risks inherent in dealing with individual borrowers, including the risk that a borrower may not provide information to us about its business in a timely manner, and/or may present inaccurate or incomplete information to us, and risks relating to the value of collateral. In order to manage credit risk successfully, we must, among other things, maintain disciplined and prudent underwriting standards and ensure that our lenders follow those standards. The weakening of these standards for any reason, such as an attempt to attract riskier higher yielding loans, a lack of discipline or diligence by our employees in underwriting and monitoring loans, the inability of our employees to adequately adapt policies and procedures to changes in economic or any other conditions affecting borrowers and the quality of our loan portfolio, may result in loan defaults, foreclosures and additional charge-offs and may necessitate that we significantly increase our allowance, each of which could adversely affect our net income.

Reworded

As of December 31, 2024,2025, commercial real estate mortgage loans comprised approximately 8.8%7.3% of our loan portfolio. Commercial real estate mortgage loans generally involve a greater degree of credit risk than one-to-four family residential real estate mortgage loans because they typically have larger balances and are more affected by adverse conditions in the economy. Because payments on loans secured by commercial real estate often depend upon the successful operation and management of the properties and the businesses which operate from within them, repayment of such loans may be affected by factors outside the borrower’s control, such as adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy, including interest rate fluctuations, or changes in government regulations. In recent years, commercial real estate markets have been impacted by entrenched work-from-home expectations which could affect the long-term performance of some types of office properties within our commercial real estate portfolio. Accordingly, the federal banking regulatory agencies have expressed concerns about weaknesses in the current commercial real estate market. Failures in our risk management policies, procedures and controls could adversely affect our ability to manage this portfolio going forward and could result in an increased rate of delinquencies in, and increased losses from, this portfolio, which, accordingly, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Reworded

In 2019, the New York State legislature passed theState's Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019, impactingimpacts about one million rent regulated apartment units. Among other things, the legislation: (i) curtails rent increases from material capital improvements and individual apartment improvements; (ii) all but eliminates the ability for apartments to exit rent regulation; (iii) does away with vacancy decontrol and high-income deregulation; and (iv) repealed the 20% vacancy bonus. The act generally limits a landlord’s ability to increase rents on rent-regulated apartments and makes it more difficult to convert rent-regulated apartments to market-rate apartments. In 2024, New York State passed legislation that effectively extends limits on rent hikes and “good cause” eviction requirements to many market-rate tenants in New York City and participating municipalities. As a result, the value of the collateral located in New York State securing our multi-family loans or the future net operating income of such properties could potentially become impaired. At December 31, 2024,2025, our total multifamily loan exposure in New York State is approximately $951.4$1.01 million,billion, of which approximately $697.3$821.5 million, or 73%,81%, represents our portfolio’s composition of rent stabilized and rent controlled apartments in the New York City multifamily market.

Reworded

Our estimated allowance for credit losses and fair value adjustments with respect to loans acquired in our acquisitions may prove to be insufficient to absorb actual losses in our loan portfolio, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Added

We are exposed to the risk of fraudulent activity, which continues to evolve in scope and sophistication. Fraud may take various forms, including check and debit card fraud, ATM tampering, phishing and other social engineering attacks, and the use of stolen or falsified credentials to impersonate customers. In addition, individuals or entities may properly identify themselves but seek to establish relationships for fraudulent purposes, and we may incur losses from fraud committed against third parties. Criminals increasingly obtain personally identifiable information from external sources, including third‑party data breaches. As a result, we have made and expect to continue making significant investments in fraud detection and prevention systems; however, these measures may not be effective in all cases. Fraudulent activity could result in financial losses, increased operating and compliance costs, reputational harm, regulatory scrutiny or penalties, litigation, business disruption, and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Removed

Fraudulent activity has taken many forms, ranging from check fraud, mechanical devices attached to ATM machines, social engineering and phishing attacks to obtain personal information or impersonation of our clients through the use of falsified or stolen credentials and debit card fraud. Additionally, an individual or business entity may properly identify themselves, particularly when banking online, yet seek to establish a business relationship for the purpose of perpetrating fraud. Further, in addition to fraud committed against us, we may suffer losses as a result of fraudulent activity committed against third parties. Increased deployment of technologies, such as chip card technology, defray and reduce aspects of fraud; however, criminals are turning to other sources to steal personally identifiable information, such as unaffiliated healthcare providers and government entities, in order to impersonate the consumer to commit fraud. Many of these data compromises are widely reported in the media. Further, as a result of the increased sophistication of fraud activity, we have increased our spending on systems and controls to detect and prevent fraud. This will result in continued ongoing investments in the future. Nevertheless, these investments may prove insufficient and fraudulent activity could result in losses to us or our customers; loss of business and/or customers; damage to our reputation; the incurrence of additional expenses (including the cost of notification to consumers, credit monitoring and forensics, and fees and fines imposed by the card networks); disruption to our business; our inability to grow our online services or other businesses; additional regulatory scrutiny or penalties; or our exposure to civil litigation and possible financial liability any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Reworded

We rely on third parties forto provide internal and customer-facingcustomer‑facing services.services, The use of third partieswhich may poseexpose us to operational, compliance, and strategic risksrisks. to banks. The federalFederal banking regulators expect banks implementto maintain risk‑based controls to ensure that third parties perform their activities in compliancecomply with applicable laws and regulations. In June 2023, the federal banking agencies issued “Interagency Guidance on Third-PartyThird‑Party Relationships: Risk Management”, which requiresrequiring banks to “analyze the risks associated with each third-party relationship and to calibrate its risk management processesprocesses.”. In July 2024, regulators also issued a joint statement addressing banks’ arrangements with third parties to deliver deposit products and services, concurrent with a request for information on bank‑fintech arrangements, following concerns regarding customer funds deposited through non‑bank entities without adequate controls.

Removed

In addition, in July 2024, federal banking regulators issued a joint statement on banks’ arrangements with third parties to deliver bank deposit products and services. The joint statement was released concurrently with a request for information on bank-fintech arrangements involving banking products and services distributed to consumers and businesses through third parties, including payment and lending products in addition to deposit products, in the wake of issues with customers depositing non-FDIC insured funds through non-banks without proper controls.

Reworded

In decidingextending whethercredit, to extend credit or enterentering into other transactions, and in evaluating and monitoring our loan and lease portfolio on an ongoing basis,portfolio, we may rely on financial and other information furnishedprovided by orcustomers, on behalf of customerscounterparties, and counterparties,third parties, including financial statements, credit reportsreports, and other financial information. We may also rely on representations ofregarding those customers or counterparties or of other third parties, such as independent auditors, as to thetheir accuracy and completenesscompleteness. ofIf thatsuch information.information Reliance onis inaccurate, incomplete, fraudulentfraudulent, misleading, or misleadingnot financial statements, credit reports or other financial or business information, or the failure to receive such informationreceived on a timely basis, we could result inexperience credit losses, reputational damageharm, or other adverse effects that couldmay havematerially a material adverse effect onimpact our business, financial conditioncondition, or results of operations.

Reworded

We are required to make contributionscontribute to the Consolidated Retirement Fund, a multi-employermulti‑employer defined benefit pension plan that coverscovering both our unionized and non-unionizednon‑unionized employees.employees, Ourand multi-employerour pension planrelated expense totaled $7.6$8.2 million in 2024.2025. Our future obligations may beincrease impacteddue by the funding status of the plan, the plan’s investment performance,to changes in the plan’s funded status, investment performance, participant demographics, the financial stabilitycondition of contributing employersemployers, or actuarial assumptions, and changes in actuarial assumptions. In addition, if a participating employer becomes insolvent and ceases to contribute to a multiemployer plan, the unfunded obligation of the plan will be borne by the remaining participating employers. Under current law, an employer that withdrawswithdrawal or partially withdraws from a multi-employer pension plan may incurpartial withdrawal liabilitycould to the plan. If,result in the future, we choose to withdraw from this multi-employer pension plan, we will likely need to record significant withdrawal liabilities,liability, which could negativelymaterially impactadversely affect our business, financial performancecondition inand theresults applicableof periods.operations.

Reworded

There is an increasing concern over climate-relatedClimate‑related disasters onmay theadversely impactsaffect ofour business operations,business, asset quality, and earnings. Climate-relatedThese disastersrisks include acuteacute, risksevent‑driven whichweather are event-drivenevents such as increased instances of hurricanes, tropical storms, winter storms, freezes, wildfires, tornados, floods, and other large-scalelarge‑scale weathercatastrophes, catastrophes. Any of these eventswhich could disrupt the reliability of our operations and those of our customers,customers and third ‑party vendors and suppliers.vendors. Such events couldmay impair the value of our assets and those assetscollateral securing loansour andloans, mortgagescause volatility in our investment portfolio, and theynegatively could lead to fluctuations in the value of our investments. Such events could cause downturns inimpact economic and market conditionsconditions. generally,In which could negatively impactaddition, our customers and third party suppliers and vendors and which could have an adverse effect on our business and financial results. Our expenses couldmay increase due to changing consumer preference changespreferences and increasedevolving legislation and regulatory requirements suchrelated as those associated withto the transition to a low-carbonlow‑carbon economy. The potential costs,costs associated with climate‑related risks—including strategic planning, litigation due to increased regulatory scrutinyscrutiny, or negative public sentiment,litigation, technology expenditures,investments, and losses associated with climate disaster‑related disasters losses—are difficult to predict and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditioncondition, and results of operation.operations.

Reworded

Because PACE financing programs are typically enabled through state legislation and authorized at the local government level, variations between each state’s programs may expose us to increased compliance costs and risks. On December 17, 2024, the CFPB issued its final rule implementing Section 307 of the 2018 Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (the “EGRRCPA”) and amending Regulation Z to address how TILA applies to residential PACE transactions. The final rule amends Regulation Z’s definition of credit to include residential PACE financings, prescribes ability-to-repay requirements, and implements other amendments and exemptions to clarify how other rules in Regulation Z apply. The final rule becomesbecame effective on March 1, 2026. If we fail to comply with the final rules adopted by the CFPB, we may face reputational and litigation risks with respect to our PACE assessments.

Reworded

Our trust and investment management business may be negatively impacted by changes in economic and market conditions and clients may seek legal remedies for investment performance.investment.

Reworded

Our trust and investment management business mayis besensitive negatively impacted byto changes in general economic and market conditionsconditions, becauseas theits performance of this business is directly affected by conditions in the financial and securities markets.market Thevolatility. financialMarket markets and businesses operating in the securities industryconditions are highlyinfluenced volatile (meaning that performance results can vary greatly within short periods of time) and are directly affected by, among other factors,by domestic and foreign economic conditions andfactors, general trends in business and finance,financial trends, and by the threat, as well as the occurrence of global conflicts, all of which are beyond our control. WeDeclines cannot assure you that broadin market performance will be favorable in the future. Declines in the financial markets or a lack of sustained growth maycould result in a decline inreduce the performance of our investment management business and may adversely affect the market value and performance of theassets investmentunder securitiesmanagement, that we manage, which could lead to reductionsresulting in ourlower investment management fees, becauseasset they are based primarily on the market value of the securities we manage, and could lead some of our clients to reduce their assets under our managementoutflows, or seekincreased legalclient remediesdisputes. for investment performance. If anyAny of these eventsfactors occur,could materially and adversely affect the financial performance of our trust and investment management business could be materially and adversely affected.business.

Reworded

Like most other companies with an investment management business, ourOur investment management contracts with our clients are typicallygenerally terminable by the clientclients without cause upon less than 30 days’ notice. As a result, even short ‑term declines in investment performance—whether due to market or economic conditions, the performance of theparticular securitiesinvestment westrategies manage,or which can result fromother factors outside our control such as adverse changes in market or economic conditions or the poor performance of some of the investments we have recommended to our clients, —could lead some of ourprompt clients to movereallocate assets under our management to other assetinvestment classes such as broad index fundsproducts or treasuryadvisers. securities, or to investment advisors that have investment product offerings or investment strategies different than ours. Therefore,Because our operating results are heavily dependentdepend on the financial performance of our investment portfolios and the investment strategies we employ in our investment management businesses and even short-term declines in the performance of the investment portfolios we managemanage, forany our clients, whatever the cause, could result in a declinereduction in assets under management andcould alead correspondingto decline inlower investment management fees,fees which wouldand adversely affect our results of operations.

Reworded

Our operations rely on the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and other sensitive business and consumer information on our computer systems and networks and third-party providers. Under various federal and state laws, we are responsible for safeguarding such information. For example, our business is subject to joint federal bank agency rules, the GLBA, the NYDFS cybersecurity regulations, the CCPA, and the CPRA which, among other things: (i) impose certain limitations on our ability to share nonpublic personal information about our customers with nonaffiliated third parties; (ii) require that we provide certain disclosures to customers and others about our information collection, sharing and security practicespractices, as well as any use of automated decision making for financial or lending services, and afford customers the right to “opt out” of any information sharing by us with nonaffiliated third parties (with certain exceptions) and automated decision making; (iii) limit retention of customer data; (iv) require notification of certain data breaches be provided to consumers and, in some circumstances, regulators; (v) require notification of extortion payments and ransomware deployments; (vi) require cyber audits and enhanced governance of cyber risk, including risk assessments at least annually and whenever a change in the business or technology causes a material change to our cyber risk; and (vii) require that we develop, implement and maintain a written comprehensive information security program containing appropriate safeguards based on our size and complexity, the nature and scope of our activities, and the sensitivity of customer information we process, as well as plans for responding to data security breaches. Ensuring that our collection, use, transfer and storage of personal information complies with all applicable laws and regulations can increase our costs.

Reworded

While we have not experienced any material breaches of information security,security breaches, such breaches may occur throughas a result of intentional or unintentionalinadvertent acts by thoseindividuals havingwith accessauthorized or gainingunauthorized access to our systems or to confidential information of us, our customers’customers, or counterparties’ confidential information,counterparties, including employees. InCybersecurity addition,risks increasesmay inincrease due to heightened criminal activity levels and sophistication, advancestechnological advances, newly discovered vulnerabilities (including in computer capabilities, new discoveries, vulnerabilities in third-partythird‑party technologies (includingsuch as browsers and operating systems), or other developments could result in a compromise or breach of the technology, processes and controls that we use to prevent fraudulent transactions and to protect data about us, our customers and underlying transactions, as well as the technology used by our customers to access our systems. Further, risk of cybersecurity incidents may increase with the political and economicgeopolitical instability or warfarewarfare, (including the Russia and Ukraine warconflict and reported cyber campaigns by Chinese hackers totargeting infiltrateU.S. computer networks associated with critical American infrastructure).infrastructure. We cannot be certainassure that the security measures we,we or processors,our haveprocessors in place to protect this sensitive datamaintain will be successfuleffective or sufficient to protect against all current andor emerging threatsthreats. designed to breach our systems or those of processors. Although we have developed, and continue to invest in, systems and processes that are designed to detect and prevent security breaches and cyber-attacks and regularly test our security, aA breach of our systems, or those of processors, could result in lossesfinancial to us or our customers;losses, loss of customers or business, reputational harm, business and/ordisruption, customers; damage to our reputation; the incurrence of additionalincreased expenses (including thenotification, cost of notification to consumers, credit monitoring and forensics, and feesremediation, and fines imposed by the card networks); disruption to our business; our inability to grow our online services or other businesses; additional, regulatory scrutiny or penalties;penalties, litigation, or ourother exposureadverse toconsequences, civil litigation and possible financial liability—any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditioncondition, and results of operations.

Reworded

In the event of a breakdown in our internal control systems, improper operation of systems or improper employee actions ,actions, including if confidential or proprietary information were to be mishandled, misused or lost, we could suffer financial loss, loss of customers and damage to our reputation, and face regulatory action or civil litigation. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Insurance coverage may not be available for such losses, or where available, such losses may exceed insurance limits.

Reworded

Our business is highly dependentdepends on the successfulreliable and uninterrupted functioningoperation of our information technology and telecommunications systems, third-partyincluding servicers'third‑party accounting systems and mobile and online banking platforms. We outsource many of our majorcritical systems, such asincluding data processing, loan servicing, item/payment processing systems,processing, and online banking platforms. The failureFailure of these systems, or the termination of arelated third-partythird‑party software licenselicenses or service agreementagreements, onor whichcapacity anyconstraints ofor theseinterruptions systemsat isthird‑party based,providers could interruptdisrupt our operations. BecauseSustained ouror informationrepeated technology and telecommunications systems interface with and depend on third-party systems, wedisruptions could experience service denials if demand for such services exceeds capacity or such third-party systems fail or experience interruptions. If sustained or repeated, a system failure or service denial could result in a deterioration ofimpair our ability to process newloans, andaccept renewal loans or to gather depositsdeposits, and provide customer serviceservice, and it could compromise our ability to operate effectively, damageharm our reputation, result in alost lossbusiness, ofincrease businessregulatory scrutiny, and subjectexpose us to additional regulatory scrutiny and possible financial liability, any of which could havematerially aadversely material adverse effect onaffect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, failurethird‑party of third parties to complynoncompliance with applicable laws and regulations, or fraud, misconduct, or material errors on the part ofby our employees or employeesthose of anyour ofservice these third partiesproviders, could disrupt our operations or adversely affect our reputation.

Reworded

We expect that new technologies and business processes applicable to the banking industry will continue to emerge, and these new technologies and business processes may be better than those we currently use. Because the pace of technological change is high and our industry is intensely competitive, we may not be able to sustain our investment in new technology as critical systems and applications become obsolete or as better ones become available. A failure to maintain current technology and business processes could cause disruptions in our operations or cause our products and services to be less competitive, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. We expect regulatory risk and compliance costs from AI implementation to increase. Federal and state regulators have intensified their oversight of AI in financial services. Under the Federal Reserve’s November 2025 Supervisory Operating Principles, examiners now prioritize the assessment of "material financial risks" stemming from AI, focusing on the transparency and explainability of models used for capital, liquidity, and credit decisions.

Reworded

Our access to deposits may also be affected by the liquidity needs of our depositors, particularly in an adverse interest rate or economic environment where they may be compelled to withdraw deposits. As a part of our liquidity management, we must ensure we can respond effectively to potential volatility in our customers’ deposit balances. Our total on-balance sheet deposits totaled $7.18$7.95 billion as of December 31, 2024.2025. For instance, our on-balance sheet deposits from political campaigns, PACs,Political Action Committees ("PACs"), and state and national party committee clients totaled $969.6$1.73 million,billion, or 14%19% of total on-balance sheet deposits as of December 31, 20242025. and decreasedTheir their deposit balances decreased significantly after the last election campaign, resulting in short-term volatility in their deposit balances held with us through election cycles. Additionally, our on-balance sheet deposits from labor unions totaled $1.99$2.05 billion, or 28%23% of total on-balance sheet deposits as of December 31, 2024.2025. While historically we have been able to replace deposit outflows and borrowings as necessary, we might not be able to replace such funds in the future, especially if a large number of our depositors or those depositors with a high concentration of deposits sought to withdraw their accounts. We could encounter difficulty meeting a significant deposit outflow which could negatively impact our profitability or reputation. Any long-term decline in deposit funding would adversely affect our liquidity, but we believe our funding sources are adequate to meet any significant unanticipated deposit withdrawal. A failure to maintain adequate liquidity could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Reworded

We may beare subject to more stringent capital requirements in the future.requirements.

Reworded

In particular, the capital requirements applicable to us under the Basel III rules, which became fully phased-in on January 1, 2019 required us to satisfy additional, more stringent, capital adequacy standards. A failure to meet minimum capital requirements could result in certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have an adverse material effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, these requirements could have a negative impact on our ability to lend, grow deposit balances, make acquisitions or make capital distributions in the form of dividends or share repurchases. Higher capital levels could also lower our return on equity. In July 2023, federal agencies jointly proposed revisions to the Basel III rules to implement the Basel Committee’s 2017 standards and make other changes. Subsequently, federal banking regulators have signaled that they expect to issue a revised proposal as early as 2026, thought contents of the potential revised proposal are not yet known.

Reworded

As a fund manager, we from time-to-time engage in stockholder activism, pressing issuers on a range of corporate governance topics. This activismengagement has caused and could cause increased scrutiny over our own corporate governance activities. Any failure, or perceived failure, in our own corporate governance practices could damage our reputation adversely affecting our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Reworded

In October 2024, the CFPB finalized the Requiredrequired rule making on Personal Financial Data Rights rule to promote “open and decentralized banking” by requiring covered institutions to allow customers to authorize the transfer of certain customer information to other financial institutions. This rule enables greater competition among banks and non-banks for consumer market share, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. However, the rule's rollout is currently delayed by a "stop work" order issued by the CFPB in early 2025.

Added

We operate in an extensively regulated industry and we are subject to examination, supervision, and comprehensive regulation by various federal and state agencies. The Company is subject to Federal Reserve regulations, and the Bank is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the FDIC and the NYDFS.

Added

The current presidential administration is implementing a regulatory reform agenda that is significantly different from that of the prior administration, impacting the rule making, supervision, examination and enforcement of the banking regulation agencies and our ability to respond to those changes. The 2025 GENIUS Act and related federal mandates, as well as NYDFS rulemaking, to curb “debanking” limits our ability to manage credit and reputational risk, potentially resulting in increased compliance costs to justify account closures, heightened exposure to fraud and AML losses resulting from our limited ability to terminate relationships with customers in high-risk sectors, and adverse impacts on our operational efficiency because of the 30-day mandatory notice period for most account closures. Furthermore, these anti-debanking measures may expose us to customer-led litigation alleging violation of fair access standards. For a more detailed description of anti-debanking measures, see “Fair Lending Requirements.”

Reworded

We operate in an extensively regulated industry and we are subject to examination, supervision, and comprehensive regulation by various federal and state agencies. The Company is subject to Federal Reserve regulations, and the Bank is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the FDIC and the NYDFS. Further, potential implementation by the current administration of a regulatory reform agenda may be significantly different from that of the prior administration, impacting the rule making, supervision, examination and enforcement of the banking regulation agencies and our ability to respond to those changes. Our compliance with banking regulations is costly and restricts some of our activities,other activities besides account closures, including payment of dividends, mergers and acquisitions, investments, loans and interest rates and locations of offices. We are also subject to capitalization guidelines established by our regulators, which require us to maintain adequate capital to support our business. If, as a result of an exam, a banking agency were to determine that the financial condition, capital adequacy, asset quality, asset concentration, earnings prospects, management, liquidity sensitivity to market risk or other aspects of any of our operations has become unsatisfactory, or that we or our management are in violation of any law or regulation, the banking agency could take a number of different remedial actions as it deems appropriate.

Reworded

The Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”), the ECOA and the FHA impose nondiscriminatory lending requirements on financial institutions. The FDIC, the NYDFS, the Department of Justice, and other federal and state agencies are responsible for enforcing these laws and regulations. In October 2023, the FDIC, the FRB and the OCC jointly adopted final regulations for modernizing and implementing the CRA, which became effective on April 1, 2024, with a multi-year phase-in. These regulations create a complex regulatory scheme that will impact how the Bank’s compliance with the CRA is evaluated and that will increase its compliance obligations, unless the regulations are successfully challenged in court. Private parties may also have the ability to challenge an institution’s performance under fair lending laws in private class action litigation. A successful challenge to our performance under the fair lending laws and regulations could adversely impact our rating under the CRA and result in a wide variety of sanctions, including the required payment of damages and civil money penalties, injunctive relief, imposition of restrictions on merger and acquisitions and expansion activity, which could negatively impact our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.

Added

We may become the target of public criticism, litigation and regulatory and enforcement actions because of our ESG products and our social responsibility mission. For example, anti-debanking regulations promulgated under the GENIUS Act and at the NYDFS target financial institutions that will not lend or have made statements about not lending to certain industries. The potential impact of anti-debanking regulations on our business is discussed under the risk factor, “The banking industry is heavily regulated and that regulation, together with any future legislation or regulatory changes, could limit or restrict our activities and adversely affect our operations or financial results.”

Removed

We may become the target of public criticism, litigation and enforcement actions because of our ESG products and our social responsibility mission. For example, boycott regulations target financial institutions that will not lend or have made statements about not lending to certain industries. They prohibit a state from doing business with such institutions and/or from investing the state’s assets, including pension-plan assets, through such institutions. Boycott regulations affect financial institutions with investment policies that exclude or reduce exposure to fossil-fuel-producing energy companies or with restrictions in place for sensitive industries such as mining, timber production, or firearms manufacturing — particularly if these industries are economically important to the state.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

15new paragraphs
15removed paragraphs
44reworded paragraphs
9,531 → 9,517words in section

New heading “Investment Obligations”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: default
“While management utilizes its best judgment and information available, the ultimate adequacy of our allowance is dependent upon a variety of factors beyond our control which are inherently difficult to predict, the most significant being the macroeconomic forecasts. As economic conditions can change, the anticipated amount of estimated loan defaults and losses, and therefore the adequacy of the allowance, could change significantly. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: default
“The Company assesses the sensitivity of key assumptions at least annually by stressing the assumptions to understand the impact on the model. While management utilizes its best judgment and information available, the ultimate adequacy of our allowance is dependent upon a variety of factors beyond our control which are inherently difficult to predict, the most significant being the macroeconomic forecasts. The Company's forecast of economic conditions considers baseline, favorable, and adverse scenarios. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: default
“For segments other than the consumer solar loan segment, we calculate the quantitative portion of the allowance for credit losses using the discounted cash flow methodology ("DCF") whereby the amortized cost basis of the loan is compared to the net present value of expected cash flows to be collected. For segments with reserves calculated under the DCF model, a peer group by segment is used to develop periodic default rates, and statistical regression is utilized to relate historical macro-economic variables to historical credit loss experience of that peer group of banks. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: credit rating
“Our securities portfolio primarily consists of high quality investments in mortgage-backed securities to government sponsored entities and other asset-backed securities and PACE assessments. All non-agency securities, composed of non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities, collateralized loan obligations, non-agency mortgage-backed securities, and asset-backed securities, are senior tranche and approximately 86% carry AAA credit ratings and 14% carry A credit ratings or higher. Approximately 75% of this portfolio is classified as “available for sale.””
see in full comparison
New text
“Investment Obligations”
see in full comparison
Reworded

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Provision for credit losses totaled an expense of $10.3$16.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, compared to an expense of $14.7$10.3 million for the same period in 2023.2024. For the year ended December 31, 2025, the provision for credit losses on loans totaled $17.6 million, the provision for credit losses on securities totaled $39.6 thousand, and the provision for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures was a release of reserves of $1.4 million. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the provision for credit losses on loans totaled $10.4 million, the provision for credit losses on securities totaled $18.8 thousand, and the provision for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures was a release of reserves of $50.0 thousand. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the provision for credit losses on loans totaled $13.5 million, the provision for credit losses on securities totaled $1.2 million, and the provision for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures was a release of reserves of $0.1 million. Overall, the provision expense on loans was primarily driven by portfolio growth, charge-offs on consumer solar loans,and business banking portfolios, a charge-off for one syndicated commercial and certainindustrial individualloan in connection with a note sale, a charge-off for one multi-family loan in connection with a transfer to held-for-sale, and increases in specific reserves, partially offset by improvementsrelease inof macro-economic forecasts usedreserves in the CECLone-to-four modelfamily residential real estate and releasesconsumer solar loan portfolios as a result of reservesthe dueCompany's toportfolio lowerrunoff unfunded exposures.strategy.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (74)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 23 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Added

Overview

Reworded

We offer a complete suite of commercial and retail banking, investment management and trust and custody services. Our commercial banking and trust businesses are national in scope and we also offer a full range of products and services to both commercial and retail customers through our three branch offices across New York City, one branch office in Washington, D.C., one branch office in San Francisco, one commercial office in Boston and our digital banking platform. Our corporate divisions include Commercial Banking, Trust and Investment Management and Consumer Banking. Product line includes residential mortgage loans,loans C&I loans, CRE loans, multifamily mortgages, consumer loans (predominantly residential solar) and a variety of commercial and consumer deposit products, including non-interest bearing accounts, interest-bearing demand products, savings accounts, money market accounts and certificates of deposit. We also offer online banking and bill payment services, online cash management, safe deposit box rentals, debit card and ATM card services and the availability of a nationwide network of ATMs for our customers.

Reworded

On January 1, 2023, we adopted the Current Expected Credit Losses (“CECL”) Standard, which requires that loans held for investment be accounted for under the current expected credit losses model. The allowance for credit losses is established and maintained through a provision for credit losses based on expected losses inherent in our loan portfolio. Management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance on a quarterly basis, and additions to the allowance are charged to expense and subsequent changes (favorable and unfavorable) in expected credit losses are recognized immediately in net income as a credit loss expense or a reversal of credit loss expense. Loans are charged off against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed.confirmed, Expectedand expected recoveries do not exceed the aggregate of amounts previously charged-off and expected to be charged-off. Determining the appropriateness of the allowance is complex and requires judgment by management about the effect of inherently uncertain matters.

Added

As described in Note 5 of the consolidated financial statements, the Company enhanced its allowance for credit loss ("ACL") calculation during 2025, which included a change in its ACL software vendor. The enhancement is intended to better align the estimation process with the nature and risk profile of the Company's loan portfolio, while enhancing operational efficiency and consistency in application. The enhancement did not have a material impact to the Company's financial statements. See Note 5 of our consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the change.

Added

For segments other than the consumer solar loan segment, we calculate the quantitative portion of the allowance for credit losses using the discounted cash flow methodology ("DCF") whereby the amortized cost basis of the loan is compared to the net present value of expected cash flows to be collected. For segments with reserves calculated under the DCF model, a peer group by segment is used to develop periodic default rates, and statistical regression is utilized to relate historical macro-economic variables to historical credit loss experience of that peer group of banks. The DCF model includes a four-quarter reasonable and supportable economic forecast period followed by a four-quarter straight-line reversion to historical loss rates. In addition, the model incorporates assumptions for curtailment rates and recovery lag periods in its calculation of quantitative allowance.

Added

For the consumer solar loan segment, the weighted average remaining maturity ("WARM") methodology calculates expected credit losses based on historical loss rates and forecasts those losses over the weighted average remaining maturity of the portfolio. The core assumption of the WARM methodology is based on use of internal loss data applied to a straight-line balance reduction, which aligns with the nature of repayment of these loans as well as the Company’s strategy of portfolio runoff.

Removed

Determining the appropriateness of the allowance is complex and requires judgment by management about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. In determining the allowance for credit losses for loans that share similar risk characteristics, the Company utilizes a model which compares the amortized cost basis of the loan to the net present value of expected cash flows to be collected. Expected credit losses are determined by aggregating the individual cash flows and calculating a loss percentage by loan segment for loans that share similar risk characteristics. For a loan that does not share risk characteristics with other loans, the Company will evaluate the loan on an individual basis. Within the model, assumptions are made in the determination of baseline loss rates, severity rates, reasonable and supportable economic forecasts, and prepayment rates.

Removed

The Company assesses the sensitivity of key assumptions at least annually by stressing the assumptions to understand the impact on the model. While management utilizes its best judgment and information available, the ultimate adequacy of our allowance is dependent upon a variety of factors beyond our control which are inherently difficult to predict, the most significant being the macroeconomic forecasts. The Company's forecast of economic conditions considers baseline, favorable, and adverse scenarios. As economic conditions can change, the anticipated amount of estimated loan defaults and losses, and therefore the adequacy of the allowance, could change significantly. Economic conditions more favorable than forecasted could lead to reductions in the amount of the allowance, and conversely conditions more adverse than forecasted could require increases in the amount of the allowance. Changes in economic forecasts may not occur in the same direction or magnitude across all segments of our loan portfolio and deterioration in some quantitative inputs may offset improvement in others. The Company selects the economic forecast that is most reflective of expectations at that point in time, and changes could significantly impact the calculated estimated credit losses.

Reworded

For segments that rely on a peer group to develop baseline loss rates, statistical regression is utilized to relate historical macro-economic variables to historical credit loss experience of a peer group of banks. These models are then utilized to forecast future expected credit losses based on expected future behavior of the same macro-economic variables. Adjustments to the quantitative results for both DCF and WARM models are made using qualitative factors. These factors include: (1) borrower'sborrowers' financial condition; (2) borrower'sborrowers' ability to pay; (3) nature and volume of financial assets; (4) value of the underlying collateral; (5) lending policies and procedures; (6) quality of the loan review system; (7) the experience, ability, and depth of staff; (8) regulatory and legal environment; (9) changes in market conditions; and (10) changes in economic conditions. Factors are weighted based on level of impact and assigned a risk rating that determine the amount of required qualitative reserves. The level of impact and risk ratings are evaluated each quarter.

Reworded

For loans that do not share risk characteristics, the Company evaluates these loans on an individual basis based on various factors. Factors that may be considered are borrowerborrowers delinquency trends and nonaccrual status, probability of foreclosure or note sale, changes in the borrower’sborrowers' circumstances or cash collections, borrower’sborrowers' industry, or other facts and circumstances of the loan or collateral. The expected credit loss is measured based on net realizable value, that is, the difference between the discounted value of the expected future cash flows, based on the original effective interest rate, and the amortized cost basis of the loan. For collateral dependent loans, expected credit loss is measured as the difference between the amortized cost basis of the loan and the fair value of the collateral, less estimated costs to sell.

Added

The Company assesses the sensitivity of key assumptions and economic forecasts utilized by the DCF model by segment at least annually by stressing assumptions and forecasts to understand the impact on the model. Key assumptions include peer groups per segment, macroeconomic variables used in our economic forecasts, and prepayment speeds. We apply benchmark rates for the prepayment and curtailment assumptions for statistical reference.

Added

While management utilizes its best judgment and information available, the ultimate adequacy of our allowance is dependent upon a variety of factors beyond our control which are inherently difficult to predict, the most significant being the macroeconomic forecasts. As economic conditions can change, the anticipated amount of estimated loan defaults and losses, and therefore the adequacy of the allowance, could change significantly. Economic conditions more favorable than forecasted could lead to reductions in the amount of the allowance, and conversely conditions more adverse than forecasted could require increases in the amount of the allowance. The Company selects the economic forecast that is most reflective of expectations at that point in time, and changes could significantly impact the calculated estimated credit losses. To understand the impact of economic forecast changes on the ACL, we applied an adverse economic scenario to our DCF model. Consumer solar loans are not considered in this assessment as economic forecasts do not impact the WARM methodology. Compared to our December 31, 2025 baseline scenario, the adverse scenario assumes a 25 basis point lower GDP and a 18 basis point higher unemployment rate. This resulted in an increase in reserves by approximately 3%.

Reworded

Net income for the year ended December 31, 20242025 was $106.4$104.4 million, or $3.44$3.41 per average diluted share, compared to $88.0$106.4 million, or $2.86$3.44 per average diluted share, for the same period in 2023.2024. The $18.4$2.0 million increasedecrease was primarily due toan increase in non-interest expense of $12.4 million, an increase in provision for credit losses of $6.0 million, and a decrease of non-interest income of $2.3 million, partially offset by net interest income which increased by $21.1$15.4 million,million and a decrease in provision for credit losses of $4.4 million, and an increase of non-interest income of $3.9 million, offset by an increase in non-interest expense of $8.6 million, and an increase in income tax expense of $2.4$3.5 million.

Reworded

Net interest income, representing interest income less interest expense, is a significant contributor to our revenues and earnings. We generate interest income from interest, dividends and prepayment fees on interest-earning assets, including loans, investment securities and other short-term investments. We incur interest expense from interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities, including interest-bearing deposits, Federal Home Loan Bank of New York ("FHLBNY") advances, subordinated debt, and other borrowings. To evaluate net interest income, we measure and monitor (i) yields on our loans and other interest-earning assets, (ii) the costs of our deposits and other funding sources, (iii) our net interest spread and (iv) our net interest margin. Net interest spread is equal to the difference between rates earned on interest-earning assets and rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest margin is equal to the annualized net interest income divided by average net interest-earning assets. Average balances were derived from average daily balances. Because non-interest-bearing sources of funds, such as non-interest-bearing deposits and stockholders’ equity, also fund interest-earning assets, net interest margin includes the benefit of these non-interest-bearing sources.

Reworded

(2) Amounts are net of deferred origination fees and costs. With the adoption of the current expected credit losses ("CECL") standard on January 1, 2023, the average balance of the allowance for credit losses on loans was reclassified for all presented periods to other assets to allow for comparability.

Reworded

Net interest income was $282.4$297.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, compared to $261.3$282.4 million for the same period in 2023.2024. The $21.1$15.4 million, or 8.1%5.4% increase was primarily attributable to an increase in yields earned on securities and loans. These impacts are partially offset by an increase in theinterest expense and average balances of interest-bearing deposits and an increase in the cost of funds.deposits.

Reworded

Net interest spread was 2.14%2.48% for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, compared to 2.38%2.14% for the same period in 2023,2024, aan decreaseincrease of 2434 basis points. Our net interest margin was 3.51%3.59% for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, an increase of 108 basis points from 3.41%3.51% in the same period in 2023.2024. This was largely due to the continued loan growth, as well as increase in yields earned on loans and securities outpacing the increase in the cost of funds.deposits.

Reworded

The yield on average earning assets was 4.99%5.09% for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, compared to 4.67%4.99% for the same period in 2023,2024, an increase of 3210 basis points. This increase was driven primarily by the rising rate environment and an increase in average loan balances.balances as well as loan yields.

Reworded

The average rate on interest-bearing liabilities was 2.85%2.61% for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, ancompared increaseto of2.85% 56 basis points fromfor the same period in 2023,2024, whicha decrease of 24 basis points. This decrease was driven primarily by a decrease in market rates paid on deposits due to theseveral rising rate environment, growthcuts in interest-bearing deposits as customers moved into reciprocal products, as well as the utilizationfederal funds rate, and a decrease in brokered certificate of brokereddeposits, CDspartially offset by an increase in average balance of deposits, particularly in savings, NOW, and othermoney borrowings.market deposits. Non-interest-bearing deposits represented 46%39% of average deposits for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, compared to 44%46% for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024.

Added

We establish an allowance for credit losses through a provision for credit losses charged as an expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Removed

We establish an allowance for credit losses through a provision for credit losses charged as an expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income. On January 1, 2023, we adopted the CECL standard for calculating the allowance for credit losses and the provision for credit losses. For further discussion of the adoption of and methodology under the CECL standard, refer to Note 1 and Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Reworded

Provision for credit losses totaled an expense of $10.3$16.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, compared to an expense of $14.7$10.3 million for the same period in 2023.2024. For the year ended December 31, 2025, the provision for credit losses on loans totaled $17.6 million, the provision for credit losses on securities totaled $39.6 thousand, and the provision for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures was a release of reserves of $1.4 million. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the provision for credit losses on loans totaled $10.4 million, the provision for credit losses on securities totaled $18.8 thousand, and the provision for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures was a release of reserves of $50.0 thousand. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the provision for credit losses on loans totaled $13.5 million, the provision for credit losses on securities totaled $1.2 million, and the provision for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures was a release of reserves of $0.1 million. Overall, the provision expense on loans was primarily driven by portfolio growth, charge-offs on consumer solar loans,and business banking portfolios, a charge-off for one syndicated commercial and certainindustrial individualloan in connection with a note sale, a charge-off for one multi-family loan in connection with a transfer to held-for-sale, and increases in specific reserves, partially offset by improvementsrelease inof macro-economic forecasts usedreserves in the CECLone-to-four modelfamily residential real estate and releasesconsumer solar loan portfolios as a result of reservesthe dueCompany's toportfolio lowerrunoff unfunded exposures.strategy.

Reworded

Non-interest income was $33.2$30.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, compared to $29.3$33.2 million for the same period in 2023,2024, ana increasedecrease of $3.9$2.3 million. The increasedecrease of $3.9$2.3 million was primarily due to a $21.2$14.8 million increasedecrease in service charges on deposit accounts,accounts whichprimarily wasdue partiallyto decreases in IntraFi Insured Cash Sweep network ("ICS") One-Way Sell income, offset by ana $8.2$6.3 million increasedecrease in losses on the sale of securities, and a $5.5 million decrease in losses on sale of loans and change in fair value on loans held-for-sale, a $5.7 million decrease in income from equity investments, a $2.3 million increase in losses on the sale of securities as part of strategic sales in order to reinvest in higher yielding securities, and a $0.6 million decrease in other income.held-for-sale.

Reworded

Service charges on deposit accounts includes service charges income generated from our retail deposit business.business, Thewhich increase in charges during the year ended December 31, 2024 was primarily due to utilization ofincludes a custodial deposit transference structure through the IntraFi Insured Cash Sweep network ("ICS") for certain deposit programs whereby we, acting as custodian of account holder funds, place a portion of such account holder funds that are not needed to support near term settlement at one or more third-party banks insured by the FDIC (each, a "Program Bank"). Accounts opened at Program Banks are established in our name as custodian, for the benefit of our account holders. We remain the issuer of all accounts under the applicable account holder agreements and have sole custodial control and transaction authority over the accounts opened at Program Banks. We maintain the records of each account holder's deposits maintained at Program Banks. In return for record keeping services at Program Banks, the Company receives a servicing charge. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024,2025, the Company recognized $17.2$2.4 million in servicing charge income attributable to our off-balance sheet deposit strategy, compared to $149$17.2 thousandmillion for the year ended December 31, 2023, and $17 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2022.2024.

Reworded

Trust Department fees consist of fees we receive in connection with our investment advisory and custodial management services of investment accounts. Our Trust Department fees were $15.2$16.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, an increase of $11.0$1.0 thousand,million, or 0.1%,6.6%, from same period in 2023.2024.

Reworded

Equity method investments income consists of income from solar tax equity investments. DueFor toequity method investments not compliant with ASU 2023-02, Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323) - Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method. the recognition of tax credits upon initial investment, which is considered income from these investmentsinvestments, is volatile before achieving steady state. In the early stages of the investment, accelerated depreciation of the value of the investment creates net losses, after which steady state income is achieved, generally within four quarters of the initial investment. Equity method investments loss was $0.8$1.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, compared to ana incomeloss of $4.9$0.8 million for the same period in 2023.2024. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Bank invested in a solar tax equity investment that was compliant with ASU 2023-02. The tax credits from this equity investment are recognized as benefits in the tax provision line.

Reworded

Non-interest expense for the year ended December 31, 20242025 was $159.8$172.2 million, an increase of $8.6$12.5 million from $151.2$159.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The increase was primarily due to an $8.0$4.8 million increase in compensation expense due to increased headcount, corporate incentive payments, and temporary personnel costs, and a $2.1$4.3 million increase in dataprofessional processingfees, and a $4.3 million increase in technology expense, offset by a $0.5$1.4 million decrease in advertising and promotion expense, a $0.5 million decrease in occupancy and depreciation expense, a $0.3 million decrease in office maintenance and depreciation expense, and a $0.2 million decrease in amortization of intangible assets.expense.

Reworded

We had a provisionProvision for income tax expense ofwas $39.2$35.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, compared to $36.8$39.2 million for the same period in 2023.2024. Our effective tax rate was 26.9%25.5% for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, compared to 29.5%26.9% for the same period in 2023.2024. The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily driven by the recognition of a $3.3tax millioncredit adjustmentfrom a tax equity investment in compliance with ASU 2023-02 during the year ended December 31, 2023 related to a state and city tax examination regarding the inventory of prior net operating losses.2025.

Reworded

Total assets were $8.87 billion at December 31, 2025, compared to $8.26 billion at December 31, 2024, compared to $7.97 billion at December 31, 2023.2024. Notable changes within individual balance sheet line items include a $267.2$768.6 million increase in total deposits, a $286.8 million increase in loans receivable, a $168.6$230.5 million increase in totalcash deposits,and equivalents, a $35.4$122.3 million increase in investment securities, and a $246.3$24.9 million increase in FHLBresell advances,agreements, offset byand a $230.0$244.9 million decrease in other borrowings, a $29.8 million decrease in cash and equivalents and a $26.3 million decrease in resell agreements.borrowings.

Reworded

We seek to minimize credit risk in our securities portfolio through diversification, concentration limits, restrictions on high risk investments (such as subordinated positions), comprehensive pre-purchase analysis and stress testing, ongoing monitoring and by investing a significant portion of our securities portfolio in U.S. Government sponsored entity (“GSE”) obligations. GSEs include the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”), the Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”), the Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) and the Small Business Administration (“SBA”). GNMA is a wholly-owned U.S. Government corporation whereas FHLMC and FNMA are private. Mortgage-related securities may include mortgage pass-through certificates, participation certificates and collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”). We invest in non-GSE securities, including property assessed clean energy,energy or PACE,("PACE") assessments, in order to generate higher returns, improve portfolio diversification and reduce interest rate and prepayment risk. With the exception of small legacy CRA investments, Trust Preferred securities, and certain corporate bonds, all of our non-GSE securities are senior positions that are the top of the capital structure.

Reworded

Management measures expected credit losses on held-to-maturity debt securities on a collective basis by major security type. Accrued interest receivable on held-to-maturity debt securities totaled $29.8 million at December 31, 2025 and $27.0 million at December 31, 2024 and $22.5 million at December 31, 2023,2024, and is excluded from the estimate of credit losses, as accrued interest receivable is reversed for securities placed on nonaccrual status. The allowance for credit losses for held-to-maturity securities at December 31, 20242025 was $0.7 million compared to $0.7 million at December 31, 2023.2024. The provision for credit losses for held-to-maturity securities was aan recoveryexpense of $18.8$39.6 thousand for the year December 31, 20242025 compared to ana expenserecovery of $79.0$18.8 thousand at December 31, 2023.2024.

Reworded

Accrued interest receivable on available for sale debt securities totaled $11.8 million at December 31, 2025, and $11.7 million at December 31, 20242024, and is excluded from the estimate of credit losses, as accrued interest receivable is reversed for securities placed on nonaccrual status.

Reworded

The following table showshows contractual maturities and yields for the available for sale and held-to-maturity securities portfolios:

Removed

Our securities portfolio primarily consists of high quality investments in mortgage-backed securities to government sponsored entities and other asset-backed securities and PACE assessments. All non-agency securities, composed of non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities, collateralized loan obligations, non-agency mortgage-backed securities, and asset-backed securities, are senior tranche and approximately 86% carry AAA credit ratings and 14% carry A credit ratings or higher. Approximately 75% of this portfolio is classified as “available for sale.”

Reworded

Lending-related income is an important component of our net interest income and is a main driver of our results of operations. Total loans, net of deferred origination fees and allowance for credit losses, were $4.90 billion as of December 31, 2025 compared to $4.61 billion as of December 31, 2024 compared to $4.35 billion as of December 31, 2023.2024. Within our commercial loan portfolio, our primary focus has been on C&I, multifamily and CRE lending. Within our retail loan portfolio, our primary focus has been on residential one-to-four family (1st lien) mortgages and residential solar loans.

Removed

We actively purchase loans from other originating institutions that we believe provide attractive risk-adjusted returns or for CRA purposes. Over the last two years we have made the following loan purchases:

Removed

•In 2024, we purchased $19.7 million of residential mortgages, $2.3 million of commercial loans that are unconditionally guaranteed by the U.S. Government, and $11.8 million of commercial energy efficient loans.

Removed

•In 2023, we purchased $39.2 million of residential solar loans, $13.7 million of residential mortgages, $1.7 million of commercial loans that are unconditionally guaranteed by the U.S. Government, $2.1 million of consumer home improvement loans and $10.8 million of commercial energy efficient loans.

Removed

We plan to selectively evaluate the purchase of additional loan pools that meet our underwriting criteria as part of our strategic plan.

Reworded

Commercial & Industrial ("C&I.I"). Our C&I loans are generally made to small and medium-sized manufacturers and wholesale, retail and service-based businesses to provide either working capital or to finance major capital expenditures. In addition, our C&I portfolio includes commercial solar financings; for many of these we are the sole lender, while for some others we are a participant in a syndicated credit facility led by another institution. The primary source of repayment for C&I loans is generally operating cash flows of the business or project. We also seek to minimize risks related to these loans by requiring such loans to be collateralized by various business assets (including inventory, equipment, accounts receivable, and the assignment of contracts that generate cash flow). The average size of our C&I loans at December 31, 20242025 by exposure was $8.6$7.9 million with a median size of $0.8$0.6 million. We have shifted our lending strategy to focus on developing full customer relationships including deposits, cash management, and lending. The businesses that we focus on are generally mission aligned with our core values, including organic and natural products, sustainable companies, clean energy, nonprofits, and B Corporations TM.

Reworded

CRE. Our CRE loans are used to purchase or refinance office buildings, owner-occupied office buildings, retail centers, industrial facilities,facilities and mixed-used buildings,buildings. andCRE educationloans centers.have 64% of their exposure in New York City. Our CRE loans totaledhave $411.4been millionunderwritten atunder Decemberstringent 31,guidelines 2024,on whichloan-to-value comprisedand 8.8%debt service coverage ratios that are designed to mitigate credit and concentration risk in this loan category. The average LTV, based on underwriting appraisal value, of our total loan portfolio. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the CRE loanloans portfoliois increasedapproximately by 16.4% from $353.4 million at December 31, 2023.45%.

Added

Our CRE loans totaled $363.3 million at December 31, 2025, which comprised 7.3% of our total loan portfolio. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the CRE loan portfolio decreased by 11.7% from $411.4 million at December 31, 2024.

Reworded

Residential real estate lending. Our residential one-to-four family mortgage loans are residential mortgages that are primarily secured by single-family homes, which can be owner occupied or investor owned. These loans arewere either originated by our loan officers or purchased from other originators with the servicing retained by such originators. Our residential real estate lending portfolio is 99% first mortgage loans and 1% second mortgage loans. As of December 31, 2024,2025, approximately 80% of our residential one-to-four family mortgage loans were either originated by our loan officers or were acquired in our acquisition of New Resource Bank, and approximately 20% were purchased or acquired. Our residential real estate lending loans totaled $1.31$1.24 billion at December 31, 2024,2025, which comprised 76.7%77.8% of our retail loan portfolio and 28.1%25.0% of our total loan portfolio. During the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, our residential real estate lending loans decreased by 7.9%5.8% from $1.43$1.31 billion at December 31, 2023.2024. Beginning in February 2026, in order to maintain strong client relationships, the Company entered into a marketing services agreement with Embrace Home Loans to refer its customers for residential loans services, while advancing its broader strategic focus.

Reworded

Consumer solar. Our consumer solar portfolio is comprised of purchased residential solar loans, secured by Uniform Commercial Code ("UCC") financing statements. Our consumer solar portfolio is fully acquired and is in run-off mode. Our consumer solar loans totaled $365.5$325.2 million at December 31, 2024,2025, which comprised 7.8%6.6% of our total loan portfolio, compared to $408.3$365.5 million, or 9.3%,7.8%, of our total loan portfolio at December 31, 2023.2024.

Removed

We maintain the allowance at a level we believe is sufficient to absorb current expected credit losses in our loan portfolio. For further discussion of the adoption of and methodology under the CECL standard, refer to Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Reworded

The following tables presents, by loan type, the changes in the allowance for the periods indicated. With the adoption of the CECL standard, the allowance for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2025, December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 is calculated under the expected credit losses model. ForWe the year ended December 31, 2022,maintain the allowance onat loansa presentedlevel we believe is sufficient to absorb current expected credit losses in our loan portfolio. The following table presents, by loan type, the changes in the allowance for loan losses using the incurredperiods loss model.indicated.

Added

The allowance for credit losses decreased $2.5 million to $57.6 million at December 31, 2025 from $60.1 million at December 31, 2024. See Note 5 of our consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the change. The ratio of allowance to total loans was 1.16% at December 31, 2025 and 1.29% at December 31, 2024.

Added

At December 31, 2025, the allowance for credit losses on held-to-maturity securities was $0.7 million compared to $0.7 million at December 31, 2024.

Removed

The allowance for credit losses decreased $5.6 million to $60.1 million at December 31, 2024 from $65.7 million at December 31, 2023. On January 1, 2023, the adoption of the CECL standard increased the allowance for credit losses on loans by $21.2 million to recognize the Day 1 cumulative effect, primarily attributed to our consumer solar portfolio. The ratio of allowance to total loans was 1.29% at December 31, 2024 and 1.49% at December 31, 2023. Considering the Day 1 cumulative effect, the ratio of allowance to total loans at January 1, 2023 was 1.61%.

Removed

At December 31, 2024, the allowance for credit losses on held-to-maturity securities was $0.7 million compared to $0.7 million at December 31, 2023. On January 1, 2023, an allowance of $0.7 million was recorded to recognize the Day 1 cumulative effect, primarily attributed to commercial and residential PACE assessments. Additionally, the allowance for expected credit losses on off-balance sheet loan exposures was increased by $2.7 million to recognize the Day 1 cumulative impact of adopting the CECL standard.

Reworded

The following table presents the allocation of the allowance for credit losses on securities and the percentage of the total amount of held-to-maturity securities in each security category listed. The table is only applicable for the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 due to CECL adoptionlisted as of Januarydates 1, 2023indicated:

Reworded

The following table sets forth information about our nonperforming assets as of December 31, 2024,December2025, December 31, 20232024 and December 31, 2022 2023:

Added

Nonperforming assets totaled $28.7 million, or 0.32% of period-end total assets at December 31, 2025, an increase of $2.8 million, compared with $25.9 million, or 0.31% of period-end total assets at December 31, 2024. Nonperforming assets at December 31, 2025 compared to December 31, 2024 had notable changes including a $10.3 million increase in multifamily loans on nonaccrual status, partially offset by a $4.0 million decrease in commercial real estate loans on nonaccrual status, and a $3.9 million decrease in held for sale nonaccrual loans.

Removed

Nonperforming assets totaled $25.9 million, or 0.31% of period-end total assets at December 31, 2024, a decrease of $8.3 million, compared with $34.2 million, or 0.43% of period-end total assets at December 31, 2023. The decrease in nonperforming assets at December 31, 2024 compared to December 31, 2023 was primarily driven by an decrease in commercial and industrial loans on nonaccrual status.

Removed

Refer to "Allowance for Credit Losses" for discussion on the allowance for credit losses.

Reworded

Potential problem loans are loans which management has doubts as to the ability of the borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms. Potential problem loans are performing loans and include our special mention and substandard-accruing commercial loans and/or loans 30-89 days past due. Potential problem loans are not included in the nonperforming assets table above and totaled $99.8 million, or 1.1% of total assets, at December 31, 2025, and $109.4 million, or 1.3% of total assets, at December 31, 2024, as follows: $79.9 million are commercial loans currently in workout that management expects will be rehabilitated; $6.2 million are residential real estate loans at 30-89 days delinquent and $5.6 million are consumer loans at 30-89 days delinquent.2024.

Removed

At December 31, 2024, an $8.2 million multifamily loan that was in the process of being refinanced has been included as 30-89 days past due as it was past the maturity date. This loan was subsequently refinanced and is performing in accordance with the updated terms.

Reworded

As of December 31, 2024,2025, we entered into $23.7$48.7 million in short term investments of resell agreements backed by residentialgovernment mortgageguaranteed loans and other loans, with a weighted interest rate of 6.91%.6.00%. As of December 31, 2023,2024, we entered into $50.0$23.7 million of short term investments of resell agreements backed by residential first-lien mortgage loans, with a weighted interest rate of 6.34%.6.91%.

Reworded

We had a deferred tax asset,assets, net of deferred tax liabilities, of $30.8 million at December 31, 2025 and $42.4 million at December 31, 2024 and $56.6 million at December 31, 2023.2024. As of December 31, 2024,2025, our deferred tax assets were fully realizable with no valuation allowance held against the balance. Our management concluded that it was more-likely-than-not that the entire amount will be realized.

Reworded

We gather deposits through each of our three branch locations across New York City, our one branch in Washington, D.C., our one branch in San FranciscoFrancisco, and through the efforts of our commercial banking team including our Boston group which focuses nationally on business growth. Through our branch network, online, mobile and direct banking channels, we offer a variety of deposit products including demand deposit accounts, money market deposits, NOW accounts, savings and certificates of deposit, ICS accounts, Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service accounts, and brokered certificates of deposit. We bank politically active customers, such as campaigns, PACs,Political Action Committee ("PACs"), and state and national party committees, which we refer to as political deposits. These deposits exhibit seasonality based on election cycles. As of December 31, 20242025 and December 31, 2023,2024, we had approximately $969.6$1.73 millionbillion and $1.19$969.6 billion,million, respectively, in on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet political deposits which are primarily in demand deposits.

Showing the first 60 of 74 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-08-04 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-05-05 (period ending 2026-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

0new paragraphs
0removed paragraphs
0reworded paragraphs
107 → 107words in section

The section in the latest 10-Q reads in full:

Investing in shares of our common stock involves certain risks, including those identified and described in Item 1A. of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, as filed with the SEC on March 5, 2026, as well as cautionary statements contained in this report, including those under the caption “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” risks and matters described elsewhere in this report and in our other filings with the SEC.

There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025.

No wording changes found in this section.

Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

16new paragraphs
3removed paragraphs
52reworded paragraphs
9,543 → 10,651words in section

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: default
“Provision for credit losses totaled an expense of $17.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to an expense of $5.5 million for the same period in 2025. Overall, the increase in provision for credit losses during the six months ended June 30, 2026 was primarily driven by a $10.3 million increase in specific reserves established or increased on $78.0 million of multifamily loans to a single-borrower after the borrower indicated an expected default during the three months ended March 31, 2026. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: default

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Nonperforming assets totaled $98.9$102.7 million, or 1.08%1.09% of period-end total assets at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, an increase of $70.2$74.0 million, compared with $28.7 million, or 0.32% of period-end total assets at December 31, 2025. The increase in non-performingnonperforming assets at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to December 31, 2025 assets was primarily driven by a $71.5$73.9 million increase in multifamily nonaccrual loans toand a$0.5 single-borrowermillion afterincrease thein borrowerresidential indicatedreal anestate expectednonaccrual default,loans, offset by a $0.7$2.3 million decrease in construction nonaccrual loans and a $0.5 million decrease in commercial and industrial nonaccrual loans. The increase in multifamily nonaccrual loans was primarily due to $78.0 million of multifamily loans to a single-borrower that moved to nonaccrual status after the borrower indicated an expected default during the three months ended March, 31, 2026.
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: default

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Provision for credit losses was an expense of $13.5$4.4 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to an expense of $0.6$4.9 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. Overall, the increase inThe provision for credit losses during the threecurrent months ended March 31, 2025quarter was primarily driven by a $9.2 million increase in specific reserves established or increased on $78.0 million of multifamily loans to a single-borrower after the borrower indicated an expected default. The remaining provision was attributable to charge-offs on our consumer solar and commercial and industrial portfolios, and additional specificrequired reserves on nonperformingthe loans.consumer solar portfolio from the ACL model. This was partially offset by reserve releases due to declining balances in the consumer solar loan portfolio as a result of the Company's portfolio runoff strategy, and lower required reserves on C&I loans.strategy.
see in full comparison
New text topics: liquidity
“Our available for sale securities portfolio consists of residential PACE assessments, AB securities, GSE commercial and residential certificates and other debt securities. All available for sale securities are carried at fair value and may be used for liquidity purposes should management consider it to be in our best interest. At June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, we had available for sale securities of $2.24 billion and $1.78 billion, respectively.”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: liquidity

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Our investment securities portfolio consists of securities classified as available for sale and held-to-maturity. There were no trading securities in our investment portfolio at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 or at December 31, 2025. All available for sale securities are carried at fair value and may be used for liquidity purposes should management consider it to be in our best interest.
see in full comparison
New text topics: interest rate
“The average rate on interest-bearing liabilities was 2.47% for the six months ended June 30, 2026, a decrease of 17 basis points from the six months ended June 30, 2025, which was primarily due to a decrease in interest rates which leads to lower interest expense paid for deposits. Non-interest-bearing deposits represented 40.4% of average deposits for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to 38.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2025.”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (71)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 2 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

The following is a discussion of our consolidated financial condition as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to December 31, 2025, and our results of operations for the three and six month periods ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The purpose of this discussion is to focus on information about our financial condition and results of operations which is not otherwise apparent from our consolidated financial statements and is intended to provide insight into our results of operations and financial condition. This discussion and analysis is best read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes as well as the financial and statistical data appearing elsewhere in this report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 (the “2025 Annual Report”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 6,5, 2026. Historical results of operations and the percentage relationships among any amounts included, and any trends that may appear, may not indicate results of operations for any future periods.

Reworded

The Company was formed on August 25, 2020 to serve as the holding company for the Bank, effective March 1, 2021 when the Company acquired the common stock of the Bank. The Bank was formed in 1923 as Amalgamated Bank of New York by the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, one of the country’s oldest labor unions. Although we are no longer majority union-owned, the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America’s successor, Workers United and its affiliates, affiliates of the Service Employees International Union that represents workers in the textile, distribution, food service and gaming industries, remains a significant stockholder, holding approximately 38% of our equity as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our total assets were $9.17$9.41 billion, our total loans, net of allowance for credit losses were $4.97$5.08 billion, our total deposits were $8.18$8.46 billion, and our stockholders' equity was $807.6$835.0 million. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our trust business held $37.69$39.41 billion in assets under custody and $16.00$17.24 billion in assets under management.

Reworded

Net income for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $25.2$34.8 million, or $0.84$1.15 per diluted share, compared to $25.0$26.0 million, or $0.81$0.84 per diluted share, for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The $0.2$8.8 million increase was primarily due to an increase in interest and dividend income of $8.6$13.1 million, an increase in service charges on deposit accounts of $3.8$3.0 million,million and ana increase in equity investment incomedecrease of $3.1losses on sale of securities and other assets of $1.0 million, partially offset by an increase in provision for credit losses of $12.9 million and an increase in compensation and employee benefits of $3.9 million, an increase in income tax expense of $2.4 million, an increase in technology expense of $1.9 million and a decrease in other income of $0.1 million.

Added

Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was $60.0 million, or $1.99 per diluted share, compared to $51.0 million, or $1.65 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The $9.0 million increase was primarily due to an increase in interest and dividend income of $21.7 million, an increase in service charges on deposit accounts of $6.7 million, an increase in equity investment income of $3.4 million, offset by an increase in provision for credit losses of $12.4 million, an increase in compensation and employee benefits of $6.3 million, an increase in technology expense of $2.9 million, an increase in other expense of $1.0 million, and an increase of Federal deposits insurance premium expense of $0.2 million.

Reworded

(2) Includes prepayment penalty income in 1Q20262Q2026 and 1Q20252Q2025 of $49$526 thousand and $0$200 thousand, respectively.

Reworded

Net interest income was $80.2$86.1 million for the threesecond monthsquarter ended March 31,of 2026, compared to $70.6$72.9 million for the threesecond monthsquarter ended March 31,of 2025. The $9.6$13.2 million increase, or 13.6%18.1% increase from the threesecond monthsquarter ended March 31,of 2025 was primarily attributable to higher yields and average balances on interest-earning assets, and lower costs on interest bearing liabilities, partially offset by higher average balances on interest-bearing liabilities.

Reworded

Net interest spread was 2.63%2.69% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to 2.41%2.44% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, an increase of 2225 basis points. Our net interest margin was 3.75%3.78% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, an increase of 2023 basis points from 3.55% from the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. This was largely due to increases in yields and average balances on interest-bearing assetassets and a decrease in total cost of funds.

Reworded

The yield on average earning assets was 5.11%5.14% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to 5.06%5.07% for the same period in 2025, an increase of 57 basis points. This increase was driven primarily by an increase in averagehigher balancesyielding ofassets such as loans and securities, as well as an increase in loan yields.securities.

Reworded

The average rate on interest-bearing liabilities was 2.48%2.45% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, a decrease of 1718 basis points from the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, which was primarily due to a decrease in interest rates which leads to lower interest expense paid for deposits, offset by an increase in average balances of interest-bearing deposits. Non-interest-bearing deposits represented 40.7%40.2% of average deposits for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to 39.3%38.2% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.

Added

The following table sets forth information related to our average balance sheet, average yields on assets, and average costs of liabilities for the periods indicated:

Added

(1) Includes FHLBNY stock in the average balance, and dividend income on FHLBNY stock in interest income.

Added

(2) Includes prepayment penalty income in 2Q2026 and 2Q2025 of $526 thousand and $200 thousand, respectively.

Added

Net interest income was $166.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $143.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The $22.7 million increase, or 15.8% increase from the six months ended June 30, 2025 was primarily attributable to higher yields and average balances on interest-earning assets, and lower costs on interest bearing liabilities, partially offset by higher average balances on interest-bearing liabilities.

Added

Net interest spread was 2.66% for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to 2.43% for the six months ended June 30, 2025, an increase of 23 basis points. Our net interest margin was 3.76% for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of 21 basis points from 3.55% from the six months ended June 30, 2025. This was largely due to increases in yields and a decrease in total cost of funds.

Added

The yield on average earning assets was 5.13% for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to 5.07% for the same period in 2025, an increase of 6 basis points. This increase was driven primarily by an increase in higher yielding assets such as loans and securities.

Added

The average rate on interest-bearing liabilities was 2.47% for the six months ended June 30, 2026, a decrease of 17 basis points from the six months ended June 30, 2025, which was primarily due to a decrease in interest rates which leads to lower interest expense paid for deposits. Non-interest-bearing deposits represented 40.4% of average deposits for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to 38.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2025.

Reworded

Provision for credit losses was an expense of $13.5$4.4 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to an expense of $0.6$4.9 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. Overall, the increase inThe provision for credit losses during the threecurrent months ended March 31, 2025quarter was primarily driven by a $9.2 million increase in specific reserves established or increased on $78.0 million of multifamily loans to a single-borrower after the borrower indicated an expected default. The remaining provision was attributable to charge-offs on our consumer solar and commercial and industrial portfolios, and additional specificrequired reserves on nonperformingthe loans.consumer solar portfolio from the ACL model. This was partially offset by reserve releases due to declining balances in the consumer solar loan portfolio as a result of the Company's portfolio runoff strategy, and lower required reserves on C&I loans.strategy.

Added

Provision for credit losses totaled an expense of $17.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to an expense of $5.5 million for the same period in 2025. Overall, the increase in provision for credit losses during the six months ended June 30, 2026 was primarily driven by a $10.3 million increase in specific reserves established or increased on $78.0 million of multifamily loans to a single-borrower after the borrower indicated an expected default during the three months ended March 31, 2026. The remaining provision was attributable to charge-offs on our consumer solar and commercial and industrial portfolios, additional specific reserves on nonperforming loans, and additional required reserves on the consumer solar portfolio from the ACL model. This was partially offset by a reserve release on a construction loan that paid off, reserve releases due to declining balances in the consumer solar loan portfolio as a result of the Company's portfolio runoff strategy, and lower required reserves on C&I loans.

Reworded

Non-interest income was $13.3$12.3 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $6.4$8.0 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The increase of $6.9$4.3 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 was primarily due to a $3.8$3.0 million increase in service charges on deposit accounts primarily due to increases in IntraFi Insured Cash Sweep network ("ICS") One-Way Sell income, a $3.1$1.0 million decrease in losses on sale of securities and other assets, and a $0.4 million increase in equitytrust investmentdepartment fees income, andoffset by a $0.7$0.1 million increasedecrease in bank-owned life insurance income, partially offset by a $0.8 million decrease in gain on sale of loans and changes in fair value on loans held-for-sale.income.

Added

Non-interest income was $25.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $14.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase of $11.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025 was primarily due to a $6.7 million increase in service charges on deposit accounts primarily due to increases in ICS One-Way Sell income, a $3.4 million increase in equity investment income, a $0.5 million increase in bank-owned life insurance income, and a $0.4 million increase in trust fees income, partially offset by a $0.9 million decrease in gain on sale of loans and changes in fair value on loans held-for-sale, and a $0.8 million decrease in losses on sale of securities and other assets.

Reworded

Non-interest expense for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $45.9$47.3 million, an increase of $4.2$6.7 million from $41.7$40.6 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The increase was driven by a $2.4$3.9 million increase in compensation and benefits expense,expense consisting of accruals related to increased performance, as well as for the additional payroll period in 2026, a $1.0$1.9 million increase in technology expense,expense arelated $0.9to implementation of key modernization projects, $0.6 million increase in occupancyother expenses, and depreciation expense, a $0.6$0.5 million increase in advertising and promotion expense, and a $0.5 million increase in other expenses, partially offset by $1.0$0.3 million decrease in professional fees.

Added

Non-interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was $93.2 million, an increase of $11.0 million from $82.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was driven by a $6.3 million increase in compensation and benefits expense consisting of accruals related to increased performance, a $2.9 million increase in technology expense related to implementation of key modernization projects, a $1.0 million increase in other expenses to attract talent and support revenue generation, a $0.9 million increase in occupancy and depreciation expense related to office and branch relocation, a $0.9 million increase in advertising and promotion expense, and $0.2 million increase in federal deposit insurance premium expense, partially offset by $1.3 million decrease in professional fees.

Reworded

We had a provision for income tax expense of $8.8$11.9 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $9.7$9.5 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. Our effective tax rate for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was 26.0%25.4% compared to 28.0%26.7% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The decrease in the effective tax rate for three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 is primarily driven by additionala discreterecognition of a $0.5 million solar tax liabilitiescredit purchased in the three months ended March 31, 2025 related to a city and state tax examination, which was resolved in 2025.quarter.

Added

We had a provision for income tax expense of $20.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $19.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. Our effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was 25.7% compared to 27.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease in the effective tax rate for six months ended June 30, 2026 is primarily driven by additional discrete tax liabilities in the six months ended June 30, 2025 related to a city and state tax examination, which was resolved in 2025, and by a recognition of a $0.5 million solar tax credit purchased in 2026.

Reworded

Our total assets were $9.17$9.41 billion at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $8.87 billion at December 31, 2025. Notable changes within individual balance sheet line items include a $353.5$509.2 million increase in deposits, a $474.8 million increase in securities, a $228.9 million increase in deposits, a $111.5 million decrease in cash, a $65.5$180.4 million increase in net loans receivable, a $123.4 million decrease in cash, and a $17.5$10.6 million increase in resell agreements.

Reworded

Our investment securities portfolio consists of securities classified as available for sale and held-to-maturity. There were no trading securities in our investment portfolio at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 or at December 31, 2025. All available for sale securities are carried at fair value and may be used for liquidity purposes should management consider it to be in our best interest.

Added

Our available for sale securities portfolio consists of residential PACE assessments, AB securities, GSE commercial and residential certificates and other debt securities. All available for sale securities are carried at fair value and may be used for liquidity purposes should management consider it to be in our best interest. At June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, we had available for sale securities of $2.24 billion and $1.78 billion, respectively.

Removed

At March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, we had available for sale securities of $2.14 billion and $1.78 billion, respectively.

Reworded

Our held-to-maturity securities portfolio primarily consistedconsists of PACE assessments, tax-exempt municipal securities, GSE commercial and residential certificates and other debt. We carry these securities at amortized cost. We had held-to-maturity securities of $1.55$1.57 billion at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, and $1.55 billion at December 31, 2025.

Added

During the six months ended June 30, 2026 we purchased a total of $890.6 million securities consisting of both available for sale and held-to-maturity, and sold available for sale securities resulting in proceeds of $135.2 million and a net realized loss of $0.9 million as part of normal and ongoing balance sheet management. During the six months ended June 30, 2025 we purchased a total of $508.5 million securities consisting of both available for sale and held-to-maturity, and sold available for sale securities resulting in proceeds of $56.1 million and a net realized loss of $1.7 million as part of routine and ongoing balance sheet management.

Removed

During the three months ended March 31, 2026 we purchased a total of $452.0 million securities consisting of both available for sale and held-to-maturity, and sold available for sale securities resulting in proceeds of $46.2 million and a net realized loss of $0.8 million as part of normal and ongoing balance sheet management. During the three months ended March 31, 2025 we purchased a total of $161.8 million securities consisting of both available for sale and held-to-maturity, and sold available for sale securities resulting in proceeds of $16.1 million and a net realized loss of $0.7 million as part of routine and ongoing balance sheet management.

Reworded

Management measures expected credit losses on held-to-maturity debt securities on a collective basis by major security type. Accrued interest receivable on held-to-maturity debt securities totaled $18.5$23.7 million at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and $29.8 million at December 31, 2025, and is excluded from the estimate of credit losses, as accrued interest receivable is reversed for securities placed on nonaccrual status. The allowance for credit losses for held-to-maturity securities at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $0.7$0.8 million compared to $0.7 million at December 31, 2025. The provision for credit losses for held-to-maturity securities was an expense of $5.0$38.0 thousand for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and $43.0 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to aan recoveryexpense of $3.0 thousand for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 and an immaterial recovery for the six months June 30, 2025.

Reworded

Accrued interest receivable on available-for-sale debt securities totaled $13.7$15.9 million at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and $11.8 million at December 31, 2025, and is excluded from the estimate of credit losses, as accrued interest receivable is reversed for securities placed on nonaccrual status.

Added

As of June 30, 2026, approximately 58.8% of our securities portfolio is classified as “available for sale.” Our securities portfolio has a weighted average yield of 4.98% and an estimated weighted average life of 5.4 years. In total, our securities portfolio including FHLBNY stock represented 40.5% of total interest-earning assets as of June 30, 2026.

Removed

The following table shows a breakdown of our asset-backed securities by sector and ratings at carrying value based on the fair value of available for sale securities and amortized cost of held-to-maturity securities as of March 31, 2026:

Reworded

Our securities portfolio primarily consists of high quality investments in mortgage-backed securities to government sponsored entities and other asset-backed securities and Property Assessed Clean Energy ("PACE") assessments. All non-agency securities, composed of non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities, collateralized loan obligations, non-agency mortgage-backed securities, and asset-backed securities, are senior tranche and approximately 87.1%89.0% carry AAA credit ratings and 12.9%11.0% carry A credit ratings or higher. As of March 31, 2026, our securities portfolio has a weighted average yield of 4.88% and an estimated weighted average life of 5.4 years. Approximately 58.1% of this portfolio is classified as “available for sale.” In total, our securities portfolio including FHLBNY stock represented 41.2% of total interest-earning assets as of March 31, 2026.

Added

The following table shows a breakdown of our asset-backed securities by sector and ratings at carrying value based on the fair value of available for sale securities and amortized cost of held-to-maturity securities as of June 30, 2026:

Reworded

Lending-related income is the most important component of our net interest income and is the main driver of our results of operations. Total loans, net of deferred origination fees and costs, and allowance for credit losses, were $4.97$5.08 billion as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to $4.90 billion as of December 31, 2025. Within our commercial loan portfolio, our primary focus has been on C&I, multifamily and CRE lending. We intend to focus any organic growth in our loan portfolio on these lending areas as part of our strategic plan.

Reworded

Our commercial loan portfolio comprised 68.8%70.3% of our total loan portfolio at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 67.9% of our total loan portfolio at December 31, 2025. The major categories of our commercial loan portfolio are discussed below:

Reworded

C&I. Our C&I loans are generally made to small and medium-sized manufacturers and wholesale, retail and service-based businesses to provide either working capital or to finance major capital expenditures. In addition, our C&I portfolio includes commercial solar financings; for many of these we are the sole lender, while for some others we are either the lead bank or are a participant in a syndicated credit facility led by another institution. The primary source of repayment for C&I loans is generally operating cash flows of the business or project. We also seek to minimize risks related to these loans by requiring such loans to be collateralized by various business assets (including inventory, equipment, accounts receivable, and the assignment of contracts that generate cash flow). The average size of our C&I loans at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 by exposure was $4.3 million with a median size of $1.0$0.9 million. Our lending strategy focuses on developing full customer relationships including deposits, cash management, and lending. The businesses that we focus on are generally mission aligned with our core values, including organic and natural products, sustainable companies, clean energy, nonprofits, and B Corporations TM.

Reworded

Our C&I loans totaled $1.29$1.31 billion at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, which comprised 25.7%25.4% of our total loan portfolio. During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the C&I loan portfolio decreased by 3.1%2.1% from $1.33 billion at December 31, 2025.

Reworded

Our multifamily loans totaled $1.78$1.86 billion at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, which comprised 35.3%36.2% of our total loan portfolio. During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the multifamily loan portfolio increased by 8.1%13.2% from $1.64 billion at December 31, 2025.

Reworded

Our CRE loans totaled $379.9$436.1 million at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, which comprised 7.5%8.5% of our total loan portfolio. During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the CRE loan portfolio increased by 4.6%20.1% from $363.3 million at December 31, 2025.

Reworded

Our retail loan portfolio comprised 31.2%29.7% of our total loan portfolio at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 32.1% of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2025. The major categories of our retail loan portfolio are discussed below.

Reworded

As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our residential real estate lending loans totaled $1.23$1.20 billion at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, which decreased by 0.9%3.1% from $1.24 billion at December 31, 2025. The residential real estate portfolio comprised 78.2%78.5% of our retail loan portfolio and 24.4%23.3% of our total loan portfolio, and is 99% first mortgage loans and 1% second mortgage loans.

Reworded

Consumer solar. Our consumer solar portfolio is comprised of purchased residential solar loans, secured by Uniform Commercial Code financing statements. Our consumer solar portfolio is fully acquired and is in run-off mode. Our consumer solar loans totaled $315.0$303.5 million at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, which comprised 6.3%5.9% of our total loan portfolio, compared to $325.2 million, or 6.6% of our total loan portfolio, at December 31, 2025.

Reworded

Consumer and other. Our consumer and other portfolio is comprised of purchased student loans, unsecured consumer loans and overdraft lines. Our consumer and other loans totaled $25.9$24.5 million at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, which comprised 0.5% of our total loan portfolio, compared to $27.7 million, or 0.5% of our total loan portfolio, at December 31, 2025.

Reworded

The information in the following table is based on the contractual maturities of individual loans, including loans that may be subject to renewal at their contractual maturity. Renewal of these loans is subject to review and credit approval, as well as modification of terms upon maturity. Actual repayments of loans may differ from the maturities reflected below because borrowers have the right to prepay obligations with or without prepayment penalties. The following tables summarize the loan maturity distribution by type and related interest rate characteristics at MarchJune 31,30, 2026:

Reworded

The following table presents our loans held for investment with maturity due after MarchJune 31,30, 2027:

Reworded

The following tables presents, by loan type, the changes in the allowance for credit losses for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and MarchJune 31,30, 2025:

Reworded

The allowance for credit losses on loans increased $10.6$11.4 million to $68.2$68.9 million at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 from $57.6 million at December 31, 2025, primarily asdue to increases in reserves of $10.3 million for a resultsingle ofborrower anrelationship increasethat ofmoved specificto reservesnonaccrual onstatus nonperformingduring loans.the three months ended March 31, 2026. The ratio of allowance to total loans was 1.35%1.34% at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 1.16% at December 31, 2025.

Reworded

At MarchJune 31,30, 2026 the allowance for credit losses on held-to-maturity securities was $0.7$0.8 million, compared to $0.7 million at December 31, 2025.

Reworded

Nonperforming assets totaled $98.9$102.7 million, or 1.08%1.09% of period-end total assets at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, an increase of $70.2$74.0 million, compared with $28.7 million, or 0.32% of period-end total assets at December 31, 2025. The increase in non-performingnonperforming assets at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to December 31, 2025 assets was primarily driven by a $71.5$73.9 million increase in multifamily nonaccrual loans toand a$0.5 single-borrowermillion afterincrease thein borrowerresidential indicatedreal anestate expectednonaccrual default,loans, offset by a $0.7$2.3 million decrease in construction nonaccrual loans and a $0.5 million decrease in commercial and industrial nonaccrual loans. The increase in multifamily nonaccrual loans was primarily due to $78.0 million of multifamily loans to a single-borrower that moved to nonaccrual status after the borrower indicated an expected default during the three months ended March, 31, 2026.

Reworded

Potential problem loans are loans which management has doubts as to the ability of the borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms. Potential problem loans are performing loans and include our special mention and substandard-accruing commercial loans and/or retail loans 30-89 days past due. Potential problem loans are not included in the nonperforming assets table above and totaled $62.2$65.0 million, or 0.7% of total assets, at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, and $99.8 million, or 1.1% of total assets, at December 31, 2025.

Reworded

As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we entered into $66.1$59.3 million of short term investments of resell agreements backed by government guaranteed loans and other loans, with a weighted average interest rate of 5.88%.5.84%. As of December 31, 2025, we have entered into $48.7 million of short term investments of resell agreements backed by government guaranteed loans and other loans, with a weighted interest rate of 6.00%.

Reworded

We had a deferred tax asset, net of deferred tax liabilities, of $31.3$33.3 million at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and $30.8 million at December 31, 2025. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our deferred tax assets were fully realizable with no valuation allowance held against the balance. Our management concluded that it was more-likely-than-not that the entire amount will be realized.

Reworded

Deposits represent our primary source of funds. We are focused on growing our core deposits through relationship-based banking with our business and consumer clients. Total deposits were $8.18$8.46 billion at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $7.95 billion at December 31, 2025. We believe that our strong deposit franchise is attributable to our mission-based strategy of developing and maintaining relationships with our clients who share similar values and through maintaining a high level of service.

Reworded

We gather deposits through each of our threeoffices branchor locationsbranches across New York City, our one branch in Washington, D.C., ournorthern one branch in San FranciscoCalifornia and through the efforts of our commercial banking team including our Boston group which focuses nationally on business growth. Through our branch network, online, mobile and direct banking channels, we offer a variety of deposit products including demand deposit accounts, money market deposits, NOW accounts, savings and certificates of deposit, ICS accounts, Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service accounts, and brokered certificates of deposit. We bank politically active customers, such as campaigns, political action committees ("PACs"), and state and national party committees, which we refer to as political deposits. These deposits exhibit seasonality based on election cycles. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, we had approximately $1.86$2.08 billion and $1.73 billion, respectively, in political deposits on- and off-balance sheet which are primarily in demand deposits.

Reworded

Additionally, we utilize a custodial deposit transference structure through the IntraFi ICS network for certain deposit programs whereby we, acting as custodian of account holder funds, place a portion of such account holder funds that are not needed to support near term settlement at one or more third-party banks insured by the FDIC (each, a "Program Bank"). Accounts opened at Program Banks are established in our name as custodian, for the benefit of our account holders. We remain the issuer of all accounts under the applicable account holder agreements and have sole custodial control and transaction authority over the accounts opened at Program Banks. We maintain the records of each account holder's deposits maintained at Program Banks. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, these off-balance sheet deposits totaled $1.13$1.03 billion and $1.05 billion, respectively. In return for record keeping services at Program Banks, the Company receives a servicing fee. For the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, Thethe Company recognized $2.9$2.3 million and $8.6$5.2 thousandmillion in servicing fee income compared to $102.2 thousand and $110.8 thousand for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and March 31, 2025, respectively.2025.

Reworded

Total estimated uninsured deposits at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 were $4.76$4.84 billion and $4.61 billion, respectively.

Showing the first 60 of 71 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

AMAL insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 23 filings (14 insiders, 18 trade dates, 1,738,894 shares, about $83.6M; 6 of these filings say the sales were made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan). Net open-market shares: -1,738,894 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$83.6M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2026-10-01Brown Sam D.
SEVP, Chief Banking Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
148$46.53 $6.9K25,726 SEC
2026-09-15Searby Sean
EVP Chief Info. & Ops. Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
3,314$47.75 $158.2K17,466 SEC
2026-09-14Southern Region Workers United/seiu
10% owner
Open-market sale 82,412$47.69 $3.9M6,906,315 SEC
2026-09-14Southern Region Workers United/seiu
10% owner
Open-market sale 50,000$47.98 $2.4M373,022 SEC
2026-09-14Southern Region Workers United/seiu
10% owner
Open-market sale 95,872$47.89 $4.6M1,380,806 SEC
2026-09-14Workers United
10% owner
Open-market sale 95,872$47.89 $4.6M1,380,806 SEC
2026-09-14Workers United
10% owner
Open-market sale 50,000$47.98 $2.4M373,022 SEC
2026-09-14Workers United
10% owner
Open-market sale 82,412$47.69 $3.9M6,906,315 SEC
2026-09-11Southern Region Workers United/seiu
10% owner
Open-market sale 154,128$47.88 $7.4M1,476,678 SEC
2026-09-11Southern Region Workers United/seiu
10% owner
Open-market sale 80,000$47.88 $3.8M399,567 SEC
2026-09-11Workers United
10% owner
Open-market sale 154,128$47.88 $7.4M1,476,678 SEC
2026-09-11Workers United
10% owner
Open-market sale 80,000$47.88 $3.8M399,567 SEC
2026-09-10Darby Jason
Senior Executive VP and CFO
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
19,995$48.10 $961.8K53,851 SEC
2026-09-10Romney Edgar Jr
Chief Strategy & Admin Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
5,992$47.46 $284.4K22,393 SEC
2026-09-09Southern Region Workers United/seiu
10% owner
Open-market sale 79,649$47.91 $3.8M119,133 SEC
2026-09-09Rochester Regional Joint Board Fund For The Future
10% owner
Open-market sale 79,649$47.91 $3.8M119,133 SEC
2026-09-09Brown Sam D.
SEVP, Chief Banking Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
735$47.61 $35.0K25,874 SEC
2026-09-08Brown Sam D.
SEVP, Chief Banking Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
30,000$48.42 $1.5M26,609 SEC
2026-09-08Tenner Mandy
EVP, Chief Legal Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
2,920$48.73 $142.3K15,472 SEC
2026-09-08Southwest Regional Joint Board, Workers United
10% owner
Open-market sale 13,018$48.65 $633.3K302,518 SEC
2026-09-08Southwest Regional Joint Board, Workers United
10% owner
Open-market sale 29,892$48.52 $1.5M198,782 SEC
2026-09-08New York-New Jersey Regional Joint Board, Workers United
10% owner
Open-market sale 29,892$48.52 $1.5M198,782 SEC
2026-09-08New York-New Jersey Regional Joint Board, Workers United
10% owner
Open-market sale 13,018$48.65 $633.3K302,518 SEC
2026-09-04Southwest Regional Joint Board, Workers United
10% owner
Open-market sale 22,982$49.14 $1.1M315,536 SEC
2026-09-04Southwest Regional Joint Board, Workers United
10% owner
Open-market sale 45,801$49.23 $2.3M228,674 SEC
2026-09-04New York-New Jersey Regional Joint Board, Workers United
10% owner
Open-market sale 22,982$49.14 $1.1M315,536 SEC
2026-09-04New York-New Jersey Regional Joint Board, Workers United
10% owner
Open-market sale 45,801$49.23 $2.3M228,674 SEC
2026-09-03Southwest Regional Joint Board, Workers United
10% owner
Open-market sale 44,658$49.43 $2.2M274,475 SEC
2026-09-03New York-New Jersey Regional Joint Board, Workers United
10% owner
Open-market sale 44,658$49.43 $2.2M274,475 SEC
2026-09-02Darby Jason
Senior Executive VP and CFO
Open-market sale 1$48.20 $6673,846 SEC
2026-09-02Southwest Regional Joint Board, Workers United
10% owner
Open-market sale 44,244$48.19 $2.1M6,988,727 SEC
2026-09-02Rochester Regional Joint Board Fund For The Future
10% owner
Open-market sale 44,244$48.19 $2.1M6,988,727 SEC
2026-09-01Brown Sam D.
SEVP, Chief Banking Officer
Open-market sale 4— —56,609 SEC
2026-09-01Brown Sam D.
SEVP, Chief Banking Officer
Shares withheld for tax 2,192$47.34 $103.8K56,613 SEC
2026-09-01Darby Jason
Senior Executive VP and CFO
Shares withheld for tax 5,504$47.34 $260.6K73,847 SEC
2026-09-01Tenner Mandy
EVP, Chief Legal Officer
Shares withheld for tax 1,338$47.34 $63.3K18,392 SEC
2026-09-01Searby Sean
EVP Chief Info. & Ops. Officer
Shares withheld for tax 1,532$47.34 $72.5K20,780 SEC
2026-09-01Southwest Regional Joint Board, Workers United
10% owner
Open-market sale 15,000$47.28 $709.2K7,032,971 SEC
2026-09-01Rochester Regional Joint Board Fund For The Future
10% owner
Open-market sale 15,000$47.28 $709.2K7,032,971 SEC
2026-08-31Southwest Regional Joint Board, Workers United
10% owner
Open-market sale 73,535$48.12 $3.5M7,047,971 SEC
2026-08-31Rochester Regional Joint Board Fund For The Future
10% owner
Open-market sale 73,535$48.12 $3.5M7,047,971 SEC
2026-08-10Mark Finser
Director
Open-market sale 800$49.85 $39.9K19,433 SEC
2026-08-03Wells Royce A.
Director
Open-market sale 787$50.00 $39.4K2,694 SEC
2026-07-30Bruce Maryann
Director
Open-market sale 2,138$49.55 $105.9K17,804 SEC
2026-06-11Darby Jason
Senior Executive VP and CFO
Open-market sale 2,500$43.25 $108.1K79,343 SEC
2026-06-11Darby Jason
Senior Executive VP and CFO
Open-market sale 250$43.75 $10.9K82,093 SEC
2026-06-11Darby Jason
Senior Executive VP and CFO
Open-market sale 250$43.33 $10.8K81,843 SEC
2026-06-10Bruce Maryann
Director
Open-market sale 2,089$43.72 $91.3K19,942 SEC
2026-06-10Bruce Maryann
Director
Open-market sale 2,089$41.39 $86.5K19,942 SEC
2026-06-09Veluswamy Leslie
EVP & Chief Accounting Officer
Open-market sale 2,500$43.51 $108.8K14,215 SEC
2026-05-20Jackson Darrell B.
Director
Grant/award 1,623$40.05 $65.0K11,852 SEC
2026-05-20Lilek Joann S
Director
Grant/award 1,623$40.05 $65.0K13,990 SEC
2026-05-20Bruce Maryann
Director
Grant/award 1,623$40.05 $65.0K22,031 SEC
2026-05-20Romney Edgar
Director
Grant/award 1,623$40.05 $65.0K20,697 SEC
2026-05-20Ross Julieta
Director
Grant/award 1,623$40.05 $65.0K5,694 SEC
2026-05-20Kelly Julie
Director
Grant/award 1,623$40.05 $65.0K20,697 SEC
2026-05-20Saloutos Steven
Director
Grant/award 1,623$40.05 $65.0K3,481 SEC
2026-05-20Wells Royce A.
Director
Grant/award 1,623$40.05 $65.0K3,481 SEC
2026-05-20Miller Meredith
Director
Grant/award 1,623$40.05 $65.0K9,105 SEC
2026-05-20Mark Finser
Director
Grant/award 1,623$40.05 $65.0K20,233 SEC

Showing the 60 most recent of 62 transactions.

Well-known investors holding AMAL (13F)

InvestorQuarterSharesReported value% of their 13FChange vs prior quarter
Millennium Management (Israel Englander) COM2026-06-30154,367$7.1M0.0%Added 70%
AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) COM2026-06-30117,610$5.4M0.0%Added 1%
Two Sigma Investments COM2026-06-3086,222$4.0M0.0%Reduced 22%
D. E. Shaw & Co. COM2026-06-3048,148$2.2M0.0%Added 31%
Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) COM2026-06-3040,789$1.9M0.0%New position
Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) COM2026-06-3037,982$1.7M0.0%Reduced 40%

13F reports are filed up to 45 days after quarter end and show long U.S. equity positions only; options positions are omitted here.

Coming soon: email alerts when AMAL files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.