ASMB 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Assembly Biosciences, Inc. · Nasdaq · Pharmaceutical Preparations · CIK 1426800 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “The ongoing shutdown of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) could prevent the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) from performing normal business functions on which the operation of our business relies, which could negatively impact our business.”
New heading “We and our third-party partners and service providers are subject to stringent privacy laws, information security laws, regulations, policies and contractual obligations related to data privacy and security, and compliance with such laws, regulations, policies and contractual obligations could result in additional costs and liabilities to us and failure to comply could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.”
Largest changes
“We maintain and process certain confidential, sensitive, or personal information in the operation of our business, and rely on certain third-party vendors to process confidential, sensitive or personal information on our behalf, including in the conduct of our clinical trials. …”see in full comparison
“Certain U.S. state laws may be more stringent or broader in scope, or offer greater individual rights, with respect to sensitive and personal information than international, federal, or other state laws, and such laws may differ from each other, which may complicate compliance efforts. …”see in full comparison
“The risk of a cybersecurity incident or security breach or disruption, particularly through cyberattacks or cyber intrusion, has escalated as the frequency, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased, become increasingly difficult to detect and could be enhanced or facilitated by artificial intelligence. In addition, the prevalent use of mobile devices that access confidential information increases the risk of data security breaches. …”see in full comparison
“Regulators globally are imposing greater monetary fines for privacy violations. The EU GDPR applies to any company established in the EU as well as to those outside the EU if they collect and use personal data in connection with the offering of goods or services to individuals in the EU or the monitoring of their behavior. …”see in full comparison
“The risk of a cybersecurity incident or security breach or disruption, particularly through cyberattacks or cyber intrusion, has escalated as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. In addition, the prevalent use of mobile devices that access confidential information increases the risk of data security breaches, which could lead to the loss of confidential information or other intellectual property. …”see in full comparison
“There are numerous U.S. federal and state laws and regulations related to the privacy and security of personal information. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (45)
We and our collaborators are not permitted to market or promote any products in the United States, Europe, China or other countries before we receive regulatory approval from the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, and we may never receive such regulatory approval for our current product candidates. We have not submitted aan new drug application (NDA) to the FDA or comparable applications to other regulatory authorities and do not expect to be in a position to do so in the near future.
All our product candidates are in clinical development or in varying stages of nonclinical development. Data supporting our clinical development programs are derived from nonclinical data that support our early stage clinical programs, which will determine whether larger, pivotal studies are appropriate. These pivotal studies are necessary to support regulatory approval, and it may be years before these larger, pivotal studies are completed, if ever.
We do not have any approved products, and we have a history of losses. We expect to continue to incur substantial operating and capital expenditures to advance our current product candidates through clinical development, continue research and discovery efforts to identify potential additional product candidates and seek regulatory approvals for our current and future product candidates. All operations and capital expenditures will be funded from cash on hand, securities offerings, debt financings and payments we may receive from out-licenses, collaborations or other strategic arrangements. Adverse geopolitical and macroeconomic developments, such as potential worsening global economic conditions or economic downturn, ongoing military conflicts, related sanctions, actual and anticipated changes in interest rates, economic inflation and the responses by central banking authorities to control such inflation, and tariffs or the imposition and enforceability of tariffs, trade wars, barriers or restrictions, or threats of such actions and the related uncertainty thereof including uncertainties regarding the ability to obtain refunds for previously paid tariffs that have subsequently been invalidated, could affect our ability to access capital as and when needed.
There is no assurance that we will be successful in raising any necessary additional capital on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. If we are unable to develop and commercialize any product candidates and generate sufficient revenue or raise capital, we could be forced to reduce staff, delay, scale back or discontinue product development and clinical studies, sacrifice attractiveforego business opportunities, cease operations entirely and sell, or otherwise transfer, all or substantially all of our remaining assets, which would likely have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and share price.
In October 2023, we entered into the Gilead Collaboration Agreement with Gilead, whereby Gilead exclusively licensed to us its HPI program and NNPI program, while retaining opt-in rights to these programs, and has an option to take an exclusive license, on a program-by-program basis, to all of our other current and future pipeline programs during the collaboration term. In connection with the entry into the Gilead Collaboration Agreement, we and Gilead also entered into a common stock purchase agreement and an investor rights agreement, which were both amended in June 2024. Also in June 2024, we and Gilead subsequently entered into a securities purchase agreement and warrant agreement. In December 2024, Gilead purchased additional shares of our common stock at a premium pursuant to the terms of the common stock purchase agreement, and we amended the Gilead Collaboration Agreement in connection with an updated development plan for 6250. In August 2025, Gilead purchased additional shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase additional shares of our common stock. In December 2025, Gilead exercised its option and took an exclusive license to our HPI program, and in March 2026, Gilead declined to exercise its option to license 4334 or defer its option until completion of Phase 2 studies. Our agreements and relationship with Gilead pose a number of risks, including, but not limited to, the following:
We will be heavily dependent on Gilead for further development and commercialization of the investigational products from the programs that it opts into.into, including our HPI program, and transition of these programs to Gilead could delay these programs' clinical and approval timelines.
The results of nonclinical studies may not be representative of diseasethe product candidates' behavior in a clinical setting and may not be predictive of the outcomes of our clinical studies. In addition, the results of early clinical studies of product candidates may not be predictive of the results of later-stage clinical studies.
insufficient quantities of qualified materials made using current good manufacturing practice (cGMP) for use in clinical studies due to manufacturing challenges, delays or interruptions in the supply chain;
fewer available study sites and academic lab facilities due to changes in government funding of clinical research;
problems with the integrity of data collected in the study;
We do not have sufficient facilities or resources to conduct all our anticipated nonclinical and clinical studies internally. As a result, we contract with CROs to conduct a significant portion of the nonclinical and clinical studies required for regulatory approval for our product candidates. Our reliance on CROs reduces our control over these activities but does not relieve us of our responsibilities. For example, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our studies is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol, legal and regulatory requirements and scientific standards, including, in the case of clinical studies, good clinical practices,CGPs, even if the study is conducted by a CRO. In the event CROs fail to perform their duties in such a fashion or we are unable to retain or continue with CROs on acceptable terms, we may be unable to complete our clinical studies and may fail to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates.
In addition, these CROs may also have relationships with other entities, some of which may be our competitors. CRO personnel are not our employees, and except for remedies available to us under our agreements with such third parties, we cannot control whether they devote sufficient time and resources to our clinical and nonclinical studies. If these CROs do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or obligations or meet expected deadlines, if they need to be replaced or if the quality or accuracy of the clinical data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our clinical protocols, regulatory requirements, including good clinical practices,GCPs, or for other reasons, our research, nonclinical or clinical studies may be extended, delayed or terminated and we may not be able to obtain, or may be delayed in obtaining, regulatory approvals for our product candidates, any of which could materially harm our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
business interruptions resulting from geopolitical actions such as the war between Russia and Ukraine, the conflicts in the Middle East, including the risingrecent hostilities involving Iran, and in Venezuela, tensions between China and Taiwan, as well as tariffs,trade tension and/or the imposition and enforceability of tariffs (including tariffs that have been or may be in the future imposed by the United States and other countries and uncertainties regarding the ability to obtain refunds for previously paid tariffs that have subsequently been invalidated), other wars, acts of terrorism, natural disasters or outbreaks of disease;
differentincreased regulatory requirements for drug approvalsscrutiny or increased scrutinyprohibitions on CROs located in foreign countries, including China;
different regulatory requirements for drug approvals;
Changeschanges in trade, economic or other policies by the U.S. or foreign governments, which may result in new or unexpected changes in tariffs, trade wars, barriers or restrictions, or regulatory requirements;
The ongoing shutdown of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) could prevent the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) from performing normal business functions on which the operation of our business relies, which could negatively impact our business.
The ongoing DHS shutdown has resulted in agencies, such as CBP, have been deemed “essential” and are continuing to operate. Disruptions at the CBP and other agencies, including furloughs and reductions in workforce, are subject to the political process, which is inherently unpredictable.
Although we have yet to encounter significant delays at ports of entry due to the shutdown, in past government shutdowns, CBP delays were common in areas requiring manual review or discretionary approvals. If the current shutdown continues, the resulting delays and other disruptions could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our clinical studies require shipping clinical samples from our clinical study sites around the world to the United States for analysis and processing. CBP delays in import operations and CBP delays in inspecting imports, including difficulties with these samples clearing customs, may delay or otherwise adversely affect our ongoing clinical studies and their timelines, many of which have been communicated publicly.
Any third-party manufacturers with whom we contract might be unable to manufacture or obtain from other third parties the active pharmaceutical ingredient needed to manufacture the finished dosage form of our product candidates.
Each of these risks could delay our development efforts, nonclinical studies and clinical studies or the approval, if any, of our product candidates by the FDA or applicable non-U.S. regulatory authorities and the commercialization of our product candidates. Furthermore, workforce reductions in workforce at the FDAFDA, and any future reductions of staffing or other resources at the FDA, may lead to delays in inspecting facilities and, in turn, delayed FDA approvals for manufacturing changes. This could result in higher costs or deprive us of potential product revenues and materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We collect and maintain information in digital form and are increasingly dependent on information technology systems and infrastructure to operate our business. In the ordinary course of our business, we collect, store and transmit large amounts of confidential information, including intellectual property, proprietary business information and personal information. It is critical that we do so in a secure manner to maintain the confidentiality and integrity of such confidential information. We have outsourced elements of our information technology infrastructure and, as a result, a number of third-party vendors may or could have access to our confidential information. Our internal information technology systems and infrastructure, and those of our current and any future collaborators, contractors and consultants and other third parties on which we rely, are vulnerable to damage from computer viruses, malware, natural disasters, system outages, terrorism, war, telecommunication and electrical failures, cyberattacks, cybersecurity incidents or cyber intrusions over the Internet, attachments to emails, persons inside our organization, or persons with access to systems inside our organization.
The risk of a cybersecurity incident or security breach or disruption, particularly through cyberattacks or cyber intrusion, has escalated as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. In addition, the prevalent use of mobile devices that access confidential information increases the risk of data security breaches, which could lead to the loss of confidential information or other intellectual property. The costs to us to mitigate network security problems, bugs, viruses, worms, malicious software programs, system outages and security vulnerabilities or incidents could be significant, and our efforts to address these problems may not be successful. If unsuccessful, these problems could cause interruptions, delays, cessation of service and other harm to our business and our competitive position, including material disruption of our product development programs. For example, any loss of clinical study data from completed or ongoing or planned clinical studies could result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the data.
If a computer security breach affects our systems or results in the unauthorized release of personally identifiable information, our reputation could be materially damaged. In addition, such a breach may require notification to governmental agencies, the media or individuals pursuant to various federal, state and non-U.S. privacy and security laws, if applicable, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), as amended by the Health Information Technology for Clinical Health Act of 2009, and its implementing rules and regulations, as well as regulations promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission, state breach notification law and the European Union (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR). We would also be exposed to a risk of loss or litigation and potential liability, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The clinical and commercial success of our potential products will depend in part on the public and clinical communities’ acceptance of novel classes of product candidates. Moreover, our success depends upon physicians prescribing, and their patients being willing to receive, treatments that involve the use of our product candidates we may develop in lieu of, or in addition to, existing treatments with which they are already familiar and for which more clinical data may be available. Adverse events (AEs) in our nonclinical or clinical studies or those of our competitors or of academic researchers utilizing the same MOA as our product candidates, even if not ultimately attributable to our product candidates, and any resulting publicity could result in increased governmental regulation, larger, more complex, or an increased number of clinical trial requirements, unfavorable public perception, potential regulatory delays in the testing or approval of our product candidates, stricter labeling requirements for our product candidates that are approved, if any, and a decrease in demand for any such products.
We collect and maintain information in digital form and are increasingly dependent on information technology systems and infrastructure to operate our business. In the ordinary course of our business, we collect, store and transmit large amounts of confidential information, including trade secrets, other proprietary business information and confidential personal data. We rely on information technology systems that we or our third-party providers operate to process, transmit and store electronic information and otherwise to conduct our day-to-day operations (including confidential business, personal and patient health information in connection with our preclinical and clinical studies and our employees), which information technology systems may become subject to cyberattacks and other security breaches, and system outages. The information technology systems and infrastructure of our current and any future collaborators, contractors and consultants and other third parties on which we rely, are also vulnerable to such incidents.
The risk of a cybersecurity incident or security breach or disruption, particularly through cyberattacks or cyber intrusion, has escalated as the frequency, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased, become increasingly difficult to detect and could be enhanced or facilitated by artificial intelligence. In addition, the prevalent use of mobile devices that access confidential information increases the risk of data security breaches. A successful cyberattack could cause serious negative consequences for us, including, without limitation, the disruption of operations, the theft, misappropriation, destruction or other compromises of confidential or proprietary information (including financial information, corporate strategic plans, trade secrets and other intellectual property and data), improper access to, use or disclosure of personal and patient health information, other misappropriation of assets, and financial loss. Although we devote resources to protect our information systems, we realize that cyberattacks remain a threat, and there can be no assurance that our efforts (or those of our employees, contractors, consultants and the third-party providers on which we rely) will prevent security breaches that would result in business, legal, financial or reputational harm to us, or would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, although we carry cyber insurance, in the event of a material security incident, such coverage may not be sufficient to cover all losses. Any failure to prevent or mitigate security breaches or improper access to, use of, or disclosure of our clinical data or patients’ personal data could result in significant liability under various U.S. state and federal laws and regulations and laws of foreign jurisdictions regarding data privacy and security (or require notification to governmental agencies, the media or individuals pursuant to such laws) and may cause a material adverse impact to our reputation, affect our ability to use collected data, conduct new studies and potentially disrupt our business.
Our internal computer systems, or those of our third-party CROs or other contractors or consultants, may fail or suffer other disruptions, which could result in a material disruption of our current or future product candidates’ development programs. Despite the implementation of security, business continuity and back-up measures, in addition to cyberattacks and security incidents described above, our internal computer systems and those of our third-party CROs and other contractors and consultants are vulnerable to damage from natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication and electrical failures. While we have not experienced any such system failure, or accident to date, if such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in our operations (or those of our business partners or other third parties on which we rely), it could result in a material disruption of our programs. For example, any loss of clinical study data from completed or ongoing or planned clinical studies could result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the data. To the extent that any such disruption results in a loss of or damage to our data or applications, other data or applications relating to our technology or current or future product candidates, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liabilities and the further development of our current or future product candidates could be delayed.
Under Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), a corporation that undergoes an “ownership change” (generally defined as a greater than 50% change (by value) in its equity ownership over a three-year period) is subject to annual limitations on its ability to use its pre-change net operating loss carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes (such as research tax credits) to offset its post-change income or taxes. We have experienced ownership changes in the past, most recently in August 2025, and future equity issuances may result in additional ownership change. Accordingly, some of our net operating losses or credits could expire unutilized, and our ability to utilize our net operating losses or credits to offset U.S. federal taxable income could be limited, which would result in increased future tax liability to us. We may also be subject to similar limitations at the state level.
Our product candidates are subject to extensive and rigorous domestic government regulation, including regulation by the FDA, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, other divisions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,Services (HHS), the U.S. Department of Justice, state and local governments, and their respective foreign equivalents. Both before and after approval of any product, we and our collaborators, suppliers, contract manufacturers and clinical investigators are subject to extensive regulation by governmental authorities in the United States and other countries, covering, among other things, testing, manufacturing, quality control, clinical studies, post-marketing studies, labeling, advertising, promotion, distribution, import and export, governmental pricing, price reporting and rebate requirements. Failure to comply with applicable requirements could result in one or more of the following actions: warning or untitled letters; unanticipated expenditures; delays in approval or refusal to approve a product candidate; voluntary or mandatory product recall; product seizure; interruption of manufacturing or clinical studies; operating or marketing restrictions; injunctions; criminal prosecution and civil or criminal penalties, including fines and other monetary penalties; exclusion from federal health care programs such as Medicare and Medicaid; adverse publicity; and disruptions to our business.
The ability of the FDA to review and approve new products canhas been in the past and may in the future be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, authorization and payment of user fees, the ability to hire and retain key personnel, as well as other statutory, regulatory and policy changes. In addition, funding of other government agencies that support research and development activities that pertain to FDA review, such as research to understand new technologies or establish new standards, can shift in response to changing administrative policies and priorities. Such policy shifts, includingincluding, for example, the recent efforts to downsize the federal workforce,workforce removeby jobrestructuring eliminationthe protectionsHHS and eliminating positions at the FDA, including teams critical to the FDA's ability to conduct regular inspections, reviews and other regulatory activities, such as issuing guidance for federal workers, limit certain communications,industry and potentiallyregulations, interfereand withother userfederal fee reauthorization,agencies, may affect the timelines, completeness or duration of the FDA review process. In addition, the HHS may change the user fee reauthorization process andor fail to reauthorize user fee programs. As a result, average review times at the FDA may fluctuatefluctuate, asand athe result.outcome Ifof aany such review process may be impacted. A prolonged government shutdown or a widespread freeze on federal funding occurs,could it couldalso significantly impact the ability of the FDA to timely review and process our regulatory submissions,submissions and the National Institutes of Health to conduct research or provide grants, or cause other agencies that support the FDA to slow their work. In addition, if future legislation or administrative action or changes in FDA policy prevent the FDA or other regulatory authorities from conducting routine inspections, reviews, or other regulatory activities, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Delays in obtaining regulatory approvals might: delay commercialization of, and our ability to derive product revenues from, our product candidates; impose costly procedures on us; and diminish any competitive advantages that we might otherwise enjoy.
We and our third-party partners and service providers are subject to stringent privacy laws, information security laws, regulations, policies and contractual obligations related to data privacy and security, and compliance with such laws, regulations, policies and contractual obligations could result in additional costs and liabilities to us and failure to comply could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
We maintain and process certain confidential, sensitive, or personal information in the operation of our business, and rely on certain third-party vendors to process confidential, sensitive or personal information on our behalf, including in the conduct of our clinical trials. We and our third party partners and service providers, including our CROs and other vendors and contractors, are subject to data privacy and security laws and regulations that govern the collection, transmission, storage, use, processing, destruction, retention and security of personal information, including additional laws or regulations relating to health information. The legislative and regulatory landscape for privacy and data protection continues to evolve in jurisdictions worldwide, and these laws may at times be conflicting. It is possible that these laws may be interpreted or applied in a manner that is inconsistent with the practices we or our third party partners maintain, and any of our efforts to comply with the evolving data protection rules may be unsuccessful. Neither we nor our third party partners can guarantee that we or they are and have been in compliance with all applicable data privacy and protection laws, rules regulations, policies and standards. We may need to devote significant resources to seek to understand and comply with this changing landscape, and it is possible that these ongoing compliance efforts may be costly and require modifications to our policies, procedures and systems over time. Failure, or perceived failure, by us or our third-party partners and service providers to comply with laws and regulations regarding privacy and security of personal information could result in penalties under such laws, such as orders requiring a change in business practices, claims for damages or other liabilities, government investigations and enforcement actions, litigation and significant costs for remediation, any of which could adversely affect our business. Even if it is determined that there was no violation of these laws, government investigations into these issues typically require the expenditure of significant resources and generate negative publicity. Any resulting enforcement actions against us or our third party partners could lead to the imposition of fines, criminal prosecution of employees, claims for damages by affected individuals and reputational damage and loss of goodwill. Additionally, if we and any CROs or third parties we use to conduct clinical trials, are unable to properly protect the privacy and security of personal information, including protected health information, we and they could be found to have breached our and their contracts with certain third parties.
There are numerous U.S. federal and state laws and regulations related to the privacy and security of personal information. In particular, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), as amended by HITECH and their respective implementing regulations, establish privacy and security standards for Covered Entities and Business Associates (as defined by HIPAA) that limit the use and disclosure of individually identifiable health information, or protected health information, and require the implementation of administrative, physical and technological safeguards to protect the privacy of protected health information and ensure the confidentiality, integrity and availability of electronic protected health information. We do not believe that we are currently acting as a covered entity or business associate under HIPAA and thus are not directly subject to its requirements or penalties. However, we may obtain health information from third parties, including research institutions from which we obtain clinical trial data, that are subject to privacy and security requirements under HIPAA. Determining whether protected health information has been handled in compliance with applicable privacy standards and contractual obligations can be complex and may be subject to changing interpretation. If we or our third party partners fail to comply with applicable privacy laws, including applicable HIPAA privacy and security standards, we could face civil and criminal penalties. HHS enforcement activity can result in financial liability and reputational harm, and responses to such enforcement activity can consume significant internal resources; the HHS also has discretion to impose penalties without attempting to first resolve violations. In addition, state attorneys general are authorized pursuant to certain federal and state laws to bring civil actions seeking either injunctions or damages in response to violations that threaten the privacy of state residents. We cannot be sure how these laws and regulations will be interpreted, enforced or applied to our operations or the operations of our third party partners.
Certain U.S. state laws may be more stringent or broader in scope, or offer greater individual rights, with respect to sensitive and personal information than international, federal, or other state laws, and such laws may differ from each other, which may complicate compliance efforts. For example, in June 2018, California enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), which broadly defines personal information, gives California residents expanded privacy rights and protections, including the right to access and delete certain personal information, as well as the right to opt-out of certain sales of personal information, and provides for civil penalties for violations and a private right of action for data breaches. Additional states have passed privacy laws, such as the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act and the Colorado Privacy Act, which are similar to the CCPA. Such new privacy laws add further complexity in interpreting and implementing data privacy requirements and restrictions and thus create additional potential legal risk, require additional investment in resources for compliance programs, and could impact business strategies and the availability of previously useful data. This complexity applies to data security as well. Certain other states, including California, Massachusetts and Nevada have adopted laws requiring the implementation of certain security measures to protect personal information, and all 50 states and the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam have adopted laws including obligations to provide notification of security breaches of computer databases that contain personal information to affected individuals, state officers and others. We may also be subject to U.S. federal rules, regulations and guidance with respect to data privacy and security practices. According to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), failing to take appropriate steps to keep consumers’ personal information secure constitutes unfair acts or practices in or affecting commerce in violation of Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C § 45(a). The FTC expects a company’s data security measures to be reasonable and appropriate in light of the sensitivity and volume of consumer information it holds, the size and complexity of its business, and the cost of available tools to improve security and reduce vulnerabilities. These federal and state laws regarding data privacy and security may differ from one another, and the interplay between them may be subject to varying interpretations by courts and government agencies, increasing our costs of compliance and exposing us to potential legal risk.
In the European Union (EU), the processing of personal data, including personal health data, is governed by the provisions of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR), in addition to other applicable laws and regulations. The EU GDPR, together with national legislation, regulations and guidelines of the EU Member States governing the processing of personal data, impose strict obligations with respect to, and restrictions on, the collection, use, retention, protection, disclosure, transfer and processing of personal data. The EU GDPR also imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal data to countries outside the EU that are not deemed to have adequate protections for personal information, including the United States. The EU GDPR authorizes fines for certain violations that are in addition to any civil litigation claims by data subjects. Separately, Brexit has led and could lead to further legislative and regulatory changes and may increase our compliance costs. Data processing in the United Kingdom (UK) is governed by the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR), creating two parallel regimes, each of which authorizes similar fines and other potentially divergent enforcement actions for certain violations. Failure to comply with the EU GDPR or the UK GDPR can result in significant fines and other liability, including, under the EU GDPR, fines of up to €20 million (or £17.5 million under the UK GDPR) or four percent (4%) of global revenue, whichever is greater.
Other jurisdictions worldwide are similarly introducing or enhancing privacy and data security laws, rules and regulations, which could increase our compliance costs and the risks associated with noncompliance. Compliance with data protection laws and regulations in the U.S. and internationally could require us to take on more onerous obligations in our contracts, restrict our ability to collect, use and disclose data, or in some cases, impact our ability to operate in certain jurisdictions. Although we work to comply with applicable laws, regulations and standards, our contractual obligations and other legal obligations, these requirements are evolving and may be modified, interpreted and applied in an inconsistent manner from one jurisdiction to another, and may conflict with one another or other legal obligations with which we must comply. Any failure or perceived failure by us or our employees, representatives, contractors, consultants, CROs, collaborators, development partners or other third party partners and service providers to comply with such requirements or adequately address privacy and security concerns, even if unfounded, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. We cannot guarantee that we and our employees, representatives, contractors, consultants, CROs, collaborators, development partners and other third parties on whom we rely are, and will be, in compliance with all applicable international laws and regulations as they are enforced now or as such laws and regulations evolve or are interpreted.
We and our collaborators may be subject, directly or indirectly, to applicable U.S. federal and state anti-kickback, false claims laws, physician payment transparency laws, other fraud and abuse laws or similar healthcare and security laws and regulations, and health information privacy and security laws, which could expose us or them to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, exclusion or suspension from federal and state healthcare programs, contractual damages, reputational harm and diminished profits and future earnings.
Healthcare providers, physicians and others play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of any products for which we obtain regulatory approval. If we obtain FDA approval for any of our drug candidates and begin commercializing those drugs in the United States, our operations may be subject to various federal and state fraud and abuse laws, including the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the federal False Claims Act, and physician payment sunshine laws and regulations. Additionally, we are subject to state and non-U.S. equivalents of each of the healthcare laws described above, among others, some of which may be broader in scope and may apply regardless of the payor. These laws may impact, among other things, our proposed sales, marketing and education programs. For example, there are federal and state healthcare laws and regulations that govern prescription drug marketing practices, including off-label promotion, and increased scrutiny of direct-to-consumer advertisements. In addition, we may be subject to patient privacy regulation by both the federal government and the states and foreign jurisdictions in which we conduct our business. If we fail to comply with any applicable federal, state or foreign legal requirement, we could be subject to penalties.
Regulators globally are imposing greater monetary fines for privacy violations. The EU GDPR applies to any company established in the EU as well as to those outside the EU if they collect and use personal data in connection with the offering of goods or services to individuals in the EU or the monitoring of their behavior. The EU GDPR enhances data protection obligations for processors and controllers of personal data, including, for example, expanded disclosures about how personal information is to be used, limitations on retention of information, mandatory data breach notification requirements and onerous new obligations on services providers. Noncompliance with the EU GDPR may result in monetary penalties of up to €20 million or 4% of worldwide revenue, whichever is higher. The EU GDPR may increase our responsibility and liability in relation to personal data that we process and we may be required to put in place additional mechanisms to ensure compliance with the EU GDPR, including as implemented by individual countries. Compliance with the EU GDPR and other changes in laws or regulations associated with the enhanced protection of certain types of personal data, such as healthcare data or other sensitive information, could greatly increase our cost of developing our products or even prevent us from offering certain products in jurisdictions that we may operate in.
The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) also created new individual privacy rights for California consumers (as defined in the law) and places increased privacy and security obligations on entities handling personal data of consumers or households. The CCPA requires covered companies to provide certain disclosures to consumers about its data collection, use and sharing practices, and to provide affected California residents with ways to opt-out of certain sales or transfers of personal information. While there is currently an exception for protected health information that is subject to HIPAA and clinical study regulations, as currently written, the CCPA may impact our business activities. The uncertainty surrounding the implementation of the CCPA exemplifies the vulnerability of our business to the evolving regulatory environment related to personal data and protected health information.
Our employees, independent contractors, consultants, collaborators and CROs may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including noncompliance with regulatory standards and requirements,requirements for which we may be held responsible and which could result in significant liability for us and harm our reputation.
The price of our common stock mighthas in the past and may continue to fluctuate significantly, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
The price of our common stock fluctuates widely. Continued volatility in the market price of our common stock might prevent a stockholder from being able to sell shares of our common stock at or above the price paid for such shares. The trading price of our common stock has in the past and may continue to be volatile and subject to wide price fluctuations in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control, such as the progress, results and timing of our clinical and nonclinical studies and other studies involving our product candidates, the success or failure of our product candidates, the receipt or loss of required regulatory approvals for our product candidates, the availability of capital or the other risks discussed in this “Risk Factors” section.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Option Exercise”
Largest changes
“our ability to raise capital despite macroeconomic and geopolitical events impacting financial markets, such as rising inflation, potential effects of changes in federal government regulation or policies, including changes in or new tariffs, and market volatility;”see in full comparison
A Phase 1a study demonstrated that 4334 was well-tolerated when administered orally as single or multiple doses.see in full comparisonIn addition, the PK data support 4334 as a once daily oral therapy and predicts best-in-class activity against both MOA #1 and MOA #2.During the second quarter of 2024, we dosed our first participant in a Phase 1b clinical study of 4334. We reported interim clinical results from the initial 150 mg cohort in December 2024,whichand topline clinical results including a subsequent 400 mg cohort in June 2025. In both the 150 mg and 400 mg cohorts, 4334 continued to show a half-life supportive of once-daily oral dosing. In addition, results for both cohorts indicated that 4334 maintained clinical exposures multiple folds above those anticipated to be required for potent viral activity and inhibition of cccDNA formation.AMeanmean declinedeclines in HBV DNA of 2.9 log10 IU/mLwasand 3.2 log10 IU/mL were observed over 28 days in a population of predominately HBeAg negativeparticipants.participants receiving 150 mg and 400 mg, respectively. Among the subset of participants with detectable HBV RNA at baseline,ameandeclinedeclines of 2.5 log10 U/mLforandHBV2.3RNAlog10wasU/mLobserved.were observed over 28 days in the participants receiving 150 mg and 400 mg, respectively. As anticipated, limited changes in viral antigens were observed for the study population over the 28-day treatment period. Theseinitialantiviral data are consistent with the high potency seen preclinically for 4334. Theinterimsafety data also demonstrated that 4334 was well-tolerated with a favorable safety profile observed.Enrollment is ongoing for the second cohort, evaluating an oral once-daily 400 mg dose of 4334. Based on the strong antiviral activity observed in the first cohort, we expect that theThe 400 mg cohortwill bewas the final cohort for this Phase 1bstudy.studyWeandanticipate releasingfinal datafromwas presented at the400AmericanmgAssociationcohortfor the Study of Liver Disease, The Liver Meeting® intheNovemberfirst2025.halfThe completion of2025.the Phase 1b study of 4334 constitutes an option triggering point under the terms of the Gilead Collaboration Agreement, as defined below under "Collaboration and License Agreement — Gilead Sciences, Inc."
“In all cohorts as of the February 13, 2025 data cutoff date, 1179 has been well-tolerated with a favorable safety profile observed. Treatment-emergent AEs were all mild in intensity and all were considered not related to study treatment by the study investigators; there have been no serious AEs in any dose cohort. One self-limited Grade 2 alanine transaminase elevation was observed in a cohort evaluating the highest dose of 300 mg. There were no treatment-related Grade 3 or 4 laboratory abnormalities and no protocol-defined stopping criteria were met. …”see in full comparison
“All participants in the Phase 1b portion of the 1179 study have completed dosing and follow up. With these data, 1179 can move directly into Phase 2 enabling studies for a once-weekly treatment regimen, subject to the completion of chronic toxicology studies, which are underway. …”see in full comparison
“In the Part A cohorts, 5366 has been well-tolerated with a favorable safety profile observed with exposure of up to 70 days. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were all mild to moderate in intensity and all were considered not related to study treatment by the study investigators; there have been no serious AEs in any dose arm. There were no treatment-related Grade 3 or 4 laboratory abnormalities and no protocol-defined stopping criteria were met. There were no clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities or patterns of AEs or laboratory abnormalities noted.”see in full comparison
“In December 2025, Gilead exercised its option early to license our HPI program for the treatment of recurrent genital herpes, including 5366 and 1179. We expect to receive Gilead’s development plan and budget for the HPI program and make our decision regarding the Profit-Share (as defined below) by mid-2026. We anticipate Gilead will initiate a Phase 2 clinical study for the HPI program in 2026. For more information regarding Gilead’s exercise of its option, see “Collaboration and License Agreement—Gilead Sciences, Inc.—Option Exercise.””see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (88)
We are a biotechnology company developing innovative therapeutics targeting serious viral diseases with the potential to improve the lives of patients worldwide. Our pipeline includes multiple clinical-stage investigational therapies, including: (1) two long-acting helicase-primase inhibitors (HPI) targetingfor the treatment of recurrent genital herpes; (2) an orally bioavailable hepatitis delta virus (HDV) entry inhibitor; and (3) a highly potent next-generation capsid assembly modulator (CAM) designed to disrupt the replication cycle of hepatitis B virus (HBV) at several key points. Our pipeline also includes a novel, oral broad-spectrum non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitor (NNPI) targetingfor the treatment of transplant-related herpesviruses, which is currently undergoing studies to enable a regulatory filing, and we have additional research programs against multiple antiviral targets. In December 2025, pursuant to our collaboration with Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Gilead and the Gilead Collaboration), Gilead exercised its option to license our HPI program for the treatment of recurrent genital herpes, including our long-acting investigational candidates ABI-1179 (1179) and ABI-5366 (5366). For additional information regarding Gilead’s exercise of its option, see “Collaboration and License Agreement—Gilead Sciences, Inc.—Option Exercise.”
2025 was a pivotal year for us, as we reported data readouts for 5366, 1179, 4334 and 6250 as follows:
February 2025:
1179 – Positive Phase 1a interim results in the Phase 1a/b study June 2025:
4334 – Positive Phase 1b topline results
August 2025:
5366 – Positive Phase 1b interim results from the weekly dosing cohorts in the Phase 1a/b study 6250 – Positive Phase 1a interim results December 2025:
1179 – Positive Phase 1b interim results in the Phase 1a/b study 5366 – Positive Phase 1b interim results from the monthly dosing cohorts in the Phase 1a/b study In addition, during December 2024, we identified a development candidate, ABI-7423 (7423), in our broad-spectrum NNPI program targeting transplant-associated herpesviruses. 7423 is a prodrug, and in October 2025, we transitioned our development from 7423 to 7272, its parent molecule. 7272 is currently in regulatory filing enabling studies.
Since the beginning of 2024, we have initiated: (1) both the Phase 1a and Phase 1b portions of a Phase 1a/b study of 5366, long-acting HPI for recurrent genital herpes; (2) the Phase 1a portion of a Phase 1a/b study of 1179, also a long-acting HPI for recurrent genital herpes; (3) a Phase 1a study of 6250, an orally bioavailable HDV entry inhibitor; and (4) a Phase 1b study of 4334, a highly potent, next-generation CAM for chronic HBV infection. We expect to initiate the Phase 1b portion of the Phase 1a/b study of 1179 in the first half of 2025.
We announced interim results from the Phase 1a portion of the 5366 study in September 2024, interim results from the Phase 1b study of 4334 in December 2024 and interim results from the Phase 1a portion of the 1179 study in February 2025.
In addition, during December 2024, we identified a development candidate, 7423, in our broad-spectrum NNPI program targeting transplant-associated herpesviruses.
Genital herpes can be caused by either herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) or herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2). HSV-1 and HSV-2 are acquired by oral or genital contact either during symptomatic or asymptomatic reactivation of the virus. Both viruses replicate in neurons, where they can remain latent for the rest of the individual’s life and periodically reactivate, with the virus spreading, replicating and causing disease in epithelial tissues. Initial infection can be asymptomatic or can be marked by serious symptoms, including painful skin lesions, swelling of lymph nodes and urinary problems that can persist for two to three weeks. While genital herpes can be caused by either HSV-1 or HSV-2, recurrences are more likely to be experienced by individuals infected by HSV-2. Genital herpes recurrence can cause painful genital lesions that can lead to increased transmission and debilitate patients,individuals, and symptoms may become more serious with additional episodes. Additional complications include increased risk of HIV infection, as 30% of HIV infections acquired through sexual transmission are attributable to HSV-2 infection. In addition, people with recurrent genital herpes often experience associated psychosocial impacts, including anxiety, concerns about transmission, depression and social stigma. Immunocompromised patientsindividuals may experience more severe and prolonged symptoms due to increased recurrence rates.
Most people with initial symptomatic genital herpes who are infected with HSV-2 have frequent recurrences, generally between three and 15 per year, includingimpacting over four million people in the United States and France, Germany, Italy and Spain (collectively, the EU4) and the United Kingdom (UK). Currently, there are three antiviral drugs (all nucleoside analogs) that have been approved in the United States and the EU4/UK for the treatment of genital herpes. However, no new drugs have been approved in these regions to treat genital herpes for more than 25 years. In addition to the approved nucleoside analogs, agents such as local anesthetics or analgesics may be used to alleviate local symptoms of minor pain and discomfort.
Nucleoside analogs can be administered as episodic therapy as individual outbreaks arise or daily as chronic suppressive therapy for those with high post-exposure recurrences. However, these agents are only partially effective at controlling the infection or reducing transmission risk. With current nucleoside analog therapies, only one out of three people with recurrent genital herpes with six or more recurrences per year are able to make it through a year of treatment without a recurrence. There are still high titer (greater than 104 HSV-2 DNA copies/mL) shedding episodes under this current standard of care for recurrent genital herpes, which can lead to recurrent episodes and transmission of genital herpes. In addition, nucleoside analogs also carry a high pill burden as a lifelong daily treatment, with doses ranging from one to three times daily. There is also high treatment variability among those taking nucleoside analogs, as many seeking care may not consistently receive suppressive therapy.
Based on the limitations of current therapies, we see a path to advancing the treatment paradigm for people suffering from recurrent genital herpes. To reach that goal, we discovered and arebegan developingthe clinical development of a novel, potent, long-acting HPI for recurrent genital herpes, 5366, which demonstrated low nanomolar potency in vitro against both HSV-1 and HSV-2 clinical isolates and a favorable nonclinical safety profile in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) toxicology studies, with high safety margins and minimal potential for off-target effects.studies. In addition, we arebegan developingdevelopment of a second novel, potent, long-acting HPI for genital herpes, 1179, which was in-licensed to us as part of our collaboration with Gilead. As Gilead has exercised its option to exclusively license our HPI program, including 5366 and 1179, development will be in Gilead’s sole control following completion of the Phase 1a/b studies of 5366 and 1179, which we are managing until they are complete. For additional information regarding the option exercise, see “Collaboration and License Agreements—Gilead Sciences, Inc.—Option Exercise.”
During the first quarter of 2024, we filed a Clinical Trial Application (CTA) to support initiation of a Phase 1a/b clinical study for 5366, which was approved in April 2024, and we dosed our first participant in the Phase 1a portion of this study during the second quarter of 2024.
We reported interim data from the Phase 1b portion of the 5366 study in August 2025, focused on two different oral doses of 5366 administered on a once-weekly basis. For the powered antiviral endpoint, HSV-2 shedding rate, highly potent antiviral activity was observed with a 94% reduction compared to placebo (p<0.01) over the 29-day evaluation period in the cohort evaluating a 350 mg weekly dose. This reduction exceeded our target for the study of an 80-85% reduction in the rate of HSV-2 shedding. For a secondary clinical endpoint of genital lesion rate, a 94% reduction compared to placebo (p<0.01) was observed with the 350 mg weekly dose. The rate of genital swabs with high viral load (i.e., >104copies/mL HSV DNA), a potential surrogate for HSV-2 transmission and a secondary endpoint, was reduced by 98% compared to placebo (p<0.05) in this cohort.
We reported additional interim data from the Phase 1b portion of the 5366 study in December 2025, which included data from a monthly oral dosing regimen. In the 5366 monthly dose cohort, potent antiviral activity was observed, with a 76% reduction in HSV-2 shedding rate compared to placebo (p<0.01) over the 29-day evaluation period. The majority of positive swabs (89%) were collected in the last two weeks of the evaluation period when drug levels were declining. We observed an 88% reduction in virologically confirmed genital lesion rate (p=0.01), along with an 81% reduction in the number of samples with high viral load (p<0.01) compared to placebo in the monthly dose cohort.
Across the two weekly oral dose cohorts and the monthly oral dose cohort of the Phase 1b study, 5366 demonstrated a pharmacokinetic (PK) profile that continues to support once-weekly and potentially once-monthly dosing.
5366 was observed to be well-tolerated at all dose levels tested in the Phase 1b portion of the study. The two weekly oral cohorts are complete and unblinded safety data has been reported; the oral monthly cohort is ongoing and safety data remains blinded. Across all cohorts, the proportion of participants reporting treatment-emergent AEs was similar between 5366 and placebo recipients, and all were Grade 1 or Grade 2. One Grade 3 AE was reported, hypertriglyceridemia, in a participant with relevant medical history who had Grade 4 elevated triglycerides pre-dose on Day 1. This AE resulted in study discontinuation but was not considered treatment related. The proportion of participants reporting treatment-emergent lab abnormalities was similar in 5366 and placebo recipients with the majority being Grade 1 or Grade 2. In the unblinded weekly oral dose cohorts: there were three participants with treatment-emergent Grade 3 lab abnormalities, all of which are considered unrelated to assigned treatment; one participant with exercise-associated elevation in creatine kinase (150/30 mg QW); one participant with an elevation of cholesterol in the follow up period, which participant had a Grade 2 elevation at baseline (350 gm QW); and one participant, who was dosed with placebo, with decreased neutrophils. There did not appear to be a dose-response relationship in either the frequency or severity of the treatment-emergent AEs or lab abnormalities. No serious AEs have been reported to date.
All participants in the Phase 1b portion of the 5366 study have completed dosing and follow up. The observed PK profile continues to support once-weekly dosing and the potential for once-monthly oral dosing regimens. Additionally, all chronic toxicology studies have been completed. With these data, 5366 is ready to move into a Phase 2 clinical study.
A late-breaking oral presentation of the interim 5366 Phase 1b data reported in August 2025 was presented at the 38th Congress of the International Union Against Sexually Transmitted Infections – Europe, which took place in October 2025 in Athens, Greece. The 5366 data reported in August and December 2025 will be presented at the Congress of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) taking place in Munich, Germany in April 2026.
In September 2024, we announced positive interim data for the Phase 1a portion of the 5366 study. Interim results exceeded our objectives for this Phase 1a study and support 5366’s progression into Phase 1b, which we initiated during the third quarter of 2024. Across the Part A (Phase 1a) cohorts evaluated, 5366 had a mean half-life of approximately 20 days when dosed orally, supporting once-weekly oral dosing, the target profile for 5366, as well as showing the potential for once-monthly oral dosing. We plan to explore both once-weekly and once-monthly oral dosing regimens in the Part B (Phase 1b) portion of the study.
In the Part A cohorts, 5366 has been well-tolerated with a favorable safety profile observed with exposure of up to 70 days. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were all mild to moderate in intensity and all were considered not related to study treatment by the study investigators; there have been no serious AEs in any dose arm. There were no treatment-related Grade 3 or 4 laboratory abnormalities and no protocol-defined stopping criteria were met. There were no clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities or patterns of AEs or laboratory abnormalities noted.
We expect interim data from the Phase 1b portion of the 5366 study to be available in fall 2025.
In addition to 5366, we arehave also advancingbegun the clinical development of 1179, a structurally-differentiated HPI with single digit nanomolar potency against HSV-1 and HSV-2 and a nonclinical PK and safety profile to date that is supportive of a potential long-acting treatment by once-weekly oral administration. We submitted the CTA for a Phase 1a/bthe study of 1179 in September 2024, which was approved in October 2024. We dosed our first participant in the Phase 1a portion of this study during the fourth quarter of 2024.
We reported interim data from two oral weekly dose cohorts in the Phase 1b portion of the 1179 study in December 2025. For the powered antiviral endpoint, HSV-2 shedding rate, highly potent antiviral activity was observed with a 98% reduction in HSV-2 shedding rate compared to placebo (p<0.01) over the 29-day evaluation period in the 50 mg weekly dose cohort. This reduction exceeded our target for the study of an 80-85% reduction in HSV-2 shedding rate. Further, data revealed a 91% reduction in virologically confirmed lesion rate compared to placebo (p<0.01) with the 50 mg weekly dose. There was also a >99% reduction in the number of samples with high viral load, a potential surrogate for HSV-2 transmission and a secondary endpoint.
Across both oral weekly dose cohorts, 1179 demonstrated a PK profile that continues to support once-weekly dosing. 1179 was observed to be well-tolerated at both doses. Overall, the proportion of participants reporting treatment-emergent AEs was similar between 1179 and placebo recipients. Of the treatment-emergent AEs reported, the majority were Grade 1 or Grade 2. The most common AEs were upper respiratory tract infection and headache. There have been no serious AEs reported to date. One Grade 3 AE of migraine was reported in a participant enrolled in the 20 mg/placebo cohort.
All participants in the Phase 1b portion of the 1179 study have completed dosing and follow up. With these data, 1179 can move directly into Phase 2 enabling studies for a once-weekly treatment regimen, subject to the completion of chronic toxicology studies, which are underway. The completion of the Phase 1b studies of both 5366 and 1179 constitute an option triggering point under the terms of the Gilead Collaboration Agreement, as defined below under "Collaboration and License Agreement — Gilead Sciences, Inc." The 1179 data reported in December 2025 will be presented at ESCMID in April 2026.
In December 2025, Gilead exercised its option early to license our HPI program for the treatment of recurrent genital herpes, including 5366 and 1179. We expect to receive Gilead’s development plan and budget for the HPI program and make our decision regarding the Profit-Share (as defined below) by mid-2026. We anticipate Gilead will initiate a Phase 2 clinical study for the HPI program in 2026. For more information regarding Gilead’s exercise of its option, see “Collaboration and License Agreement—Gilead Sciences, Inc.—Option Exercise.”
In February 2025, we announced positive interim data for the Phase 1a portion of the 1179 study. Interim results exceeded our objectives for this Phase 1a study and support 1179’s progression into Phase 1b, and we plan to move directly into the Phase 1b study in participants with recurrent genital herpes. Across the Part A (Phase 1a) cohorts evaluated as of the February 13, 2025 data cutoff date, 1179 had a mean half-life of approximately four days when dosed orally, supporting once-weekly oral dosing, the target profile for 1179.
In all cohorts as of the February 13, 2025 data cutoff date, 1179 has been well-tolerated with a favorable safety profile observed. Treatment-emergent AEs were all mild in intensity and all were considered not related to study treatment by the study investigators; there have been no serious AEs in any dose cohort. One self-limited Grade 2 alanine transaminase elevation was observed in a cohort evaluating the highest dose of 300 mg. There were no treatment-related Grade 3 or 4 laboratory abnormalities and no protocol-defined stopping criteria were met. There were no clinically significant ECG abnormalities or patterns of AEs or laboratory abnormalities noted. We expect interim data from the Phase 1b portion of the 5366 study to be available in fall 2025.
The Phase 1b study of 1179 study will be conducted concurrently with the ongoing Phase 1b evaluation of 5366, our other long-acting helicase-primase inhibitor candidate that began dosing in Phase 1b in the fourth quarter of 2024. The studies are anticipated to be conducted at the same sites using equivalent eligibility criteria and outcome measures for both candidates. We plan to report interim data for both candidates together in fall 2025.
The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 254 million people worldwide are chronically infected with HBV as of 2022, and 1.2 million new infections occur each year. HBV is a leading global cause of chronic liver disease and liver transplants, and the WHO estimates that 1.1 million people died in 2022 from HBV, mostly due to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. As of 2022, ofOf the 254 million people living with chronic HBV infection, only approximately 33 million, or 13%, were aware of their infection, and only approximately 7 million, or 3%, of those diagnosed received treatment. HBV is a highly prevalent disease that infects almost three times the number of people infected with hepatitis C virus and HIV infections combined, according to the WHO.
HDV is a “satellite virus” of HBV because it can only infect people (1) who are already infected with HBV or (2) at the same time as a person is infected with HBV. HDV affects a subset of approximately 12 to 72 million HBV infected people. These individuals infected with HDV, which comprise an estimated 4.5% of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive individuals, experience a substantially increased disease burden, as they account for 18% of cirrhosis and 20% of hepatocellular carcinoma associated with HBV. HDV is considered the most severe form of hepatitis, as 70% of individuals infected with HDV progress to cirrhosis within ten years. While HDV is less prevalent in the United States, it is a significant and serious health problem with inadequate treatment in many parts of Europe, Africa, the Middle East, East Asia and parts of South America. HDV may be significantly underdiagnosed, because there were no HDV-targeted therapies approved until very recently, and the first therapy approved is only approved in Europe.European Union (EU), Australia and Canada. HDV is known to accelerate disease progression and increase the incidence of liver cirrhosis and liver cancer, which results in higher morbidity and mortality rates than HBV alone.
The current standard of care treatment for HDV is off-label pegylated interferon-α (IFN-α) injected weekly or, in Europe,the EU, Australia and Canada, a large, complex peptide inhibitor that requires daily injections, bulevirtide. There are no approved HDV treatments in the United States, and the large, complex peptide blocker is the only approved HDV treatment in the Europe.States. We believe a safe and effective oral small molecule entry inhibitor would be a significant innovation for people living with HDV, who face a significant and immediate disease burden.
The inhibition of HBV and HDV infection by molecules that bind NTCP has been demonstrated in vitro, in animal models and clinically. Notably, bulevirtide, a peptide blocker of NTCP, is the only approved therapy for HDV (approved in Europe).HDV. 6250 useshas the same clinically-validated MOA as bulevirtide. The binding of NTCP-targeted HBV/HDV entry inhibitors to NTCP has also been shown to inhibit the transport of certain bile acids into cells, which results in plasma elevations of bile acids; this effect has been well-tolerated clinically and may serve as a biomarker of pharmacologically active concentrations of drug in the plasma. In nonclinical studies in non-human primates, clinically-relevant doses of 6250 elevated bile acids to levels similar to those seen in humans with bulevirtide.
A Phase 1a clinical study of 6250 was initiated in the fourth quarter of 2024, and in August 2025, we announced interim PK, biomarker and safety data from single-ascending and multiple-ascending doses cohorts in healthy participants. Across the cohorts evaluated to date, a mean half-life of approximately four days was observed for 6250 when dosed orally, supporting the once-daily oral dosing profile target. Given this half-life, accumulation was observed in the multiple-dose cohorts with exposures on the last day of dosing generally reaching six- to seven-fold higher than the exposure seen after the first dose.
Dose-dependent elevations of total serum bile acids (TBAs) were observed for both the 5 mg and 25 mg single-dose cohorts, indicative of NTCP target engagement. In the highest single-dose cohort of 25 mg, coproporphyrin I (CP-1), a biomarker for off-target engagement of the organic anion transporters, OATP1B1 and/or OATP1B3, was also elevated. CP-1 elevation was not noted at the other doses.
Given the predicted 6250 accumulation driven by the long half-life and the observed elevations of TBAs for the single-dose cohorts, doses at and below 1 mg daily were selected for the multiple-dose cohorts to characterize the lower end of the dose-response curve. Elevation of TBAs was observed for both the 0.2 mg and 1 mg daily multiple-dose cohorts, consistent with the respective 6250 exposures. Minimal TBA elevation was observed in the 0.05 mg daily multiple-dose cohort.
Treatment-emergent AEs and laboratory abnormalities were all Grade 1 or 2 in severity with the majority being Grade 1. There were no serious AEs in any dose cohort. No protocol defined stopping criteria were met. There were no clinically significant electrocardiogram abnormalities or patterns of AEs noted.
One Grade 2 ALT elevation was observed in the cohort evaluating the highest single-dose level of 25 mg. In this cohort, off-target engagement of other liver transporters was also seen as indicated by elevated CP-1 levels. Grade 1 ALT elevations were observed at a low frequency across the other cohorts. All ALT elevations were self-limited, and none were accompanied with elevations in bilirubin or other markers of liver injury. The elevations resolved in the study period with ongoing drug exposure due to 6250's four-day half-life.
We have completed enrollment and the follow-up period in the Phase 1a study, as well as the chronic toxicology studies to enable longer term dosing and we are preparing for Phase 2 clinical studies, with Phase 2 initiation expected in the fourth quarter of 2026.
6250 Phase 1a data will be presented at the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) Congress taking place in Barcelona, Spain in May 2026.
In September 2023, we nominated 6250, a novel, orally bioavailable small molecule designed to inhibit entry of HBV and HDV by targeting NTCP. In nonclinical studies, 6250 demonstrated low nanomolar potency against all tested HBV/HDV genotypes, favorable selectivity for NTCP versus other bile acid transporters, good oral bioavailability and a PK profile in nonclinical species projected to support once-daily oral dosing. In GLP toxicology studies, 6250 demonstrated a favorable nonclinical safety profile with wide safety margins.
We initiated a Phase 1a clinical study of 6250 during the fourth quarter of 2024, and we expect interim safety, PK and biomarker data from single-ascending and multiple-ascending doses cohorts in healthy participants in the third quarter of 2025.
As a next-generation CAM, 4334 was optimized to potently disrupt viral replication (MOA #1) and prevent the establishment and replenishment of new cccDNA (MOA #2). In contrast, while active against MOA #1, first-generation CAMs have not demonstrated adequate potency to sufficiently block cccDNA formation (MOA #2).2. Further, the current standard of care, NrtIs, impacts the viral life cycle after establishment of cccDNA and can only inhibit production of new viral particles, and it does so incompletely. The chemical scaffold of 4334 is novel and distinct from all our prior CAM candidates.
A Phase 1a study demonstrated that 4334 was well-tolerated when administered orally as single or multiple doses. In addition, the PK data support 4334 as a once daily oral therapy and predicts best-in-class activity against both MOA #1 and MOA #2. During the second quarter of 2024, we dosed our first participant in a Phase 1b clinical study of 4334. We reported interim clinical results from the initial 150 mg cohort in December 2024, whichand topline clinical results including a subsequent 400 mg cohort in June 2025. In both the 150 mg and 400 mg cohorts, 4334 continued to show a half-life supportive of once-daily oral dosing. In addition, results for both cohorts indicated that 4334 maintained clinical exposures multiple folds above those anticipated to be required for potent viral activity and inhibition of cccDNA formation. AMean mean declinedeclines in HBV DNA of 2.9 log10 IU/mL wasand 3.2 log10 IU/mL were observed over 28 days in a population of predominately HBeAg negative participants.participants receiving 150 mg and 400 mg, respectively. Among the subset of participants with detectable HBV RNA at baseline, a mean declinedeclines of 2.5 log10 U/mL forand HBV2.3 RNAlog10 wasU/mL observed.were observed over 28 days in the participants receiving 150 mg and 400 mg, respectively. As anticipated, limited changes in viral antigens were observed for the study population over the 28-day treatment period. These initial antiviral data are consistent with the high potency seen preclinically for 4334. The interim safety data also demonstrated that 4334 was well-tolerated with a favorable safety profile observed. Enrollment is ongoing for the second cohort, evaluating an oral once-daily 400 mg dose of 4334. Based on the strong antiviral activity observed in the first cohort, we expect that theThe 400 mg cohort will bewas the final cohort for this Phase 1b study.study Weand anticipate releasingfinal data fromwas presented at the 400American mgAssociation cohortfor the Study of Liver Disease, The Liver Meeting® in theNovember first2025. halfThe completion of 2025.the Phase 1b study of 4334 constitutes an option triggering point under the terms of the Gilead Collaboration Agreement, as defined below under "Collaboration and License Agreement — Gilead Sciences, Inc."
In March 2026, Gilead declined to either exercise its option to license 4334 or defer its option until completion of Phase 2 studies. As a result, the Company retains full control of 4334, including the right to evaluate partnering opportunities for 4334 outside of the Gilead Collaboration. We are actively evaluating partnering opportunities for 4334 and have initiated a structured process to find potential partners. We do not plan to advance 4334 further without a partner.
In a transplant setting, when patients are experiencing immunosuppression, they are at high risk of uncontrolled viral replication and severe disease brought on by one or more herpesviruses, including cytomegalovirus (CMV), HSV-1, HSV-2, varicella zoster virus (VZV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). Each of these herpesviruses are highly prevalent, as approximately (1) 60% of transplant patients are CMV-positive; (2) 60% of transplant patients are HSV-positive; (3) 80% of transplant patients are VZV-positive and (4) 45% of transplant patients are EBV-positive. These viruses establish lifelong latent infections and frequently reactivate in transplant patients due to the use of immunosuppressive drugs following transplantation. These uncontrolled viralherpesvirus infections increase the risk of severe disease and serious complications, including organ rejection, graft loss and death, and impacted approximately 95,000 people receiving transplants in 2021 in the United States and Europe.
In December 2024, we nominated 74237423, a prodrug, as our development candidate to undergo CTA-enablingregulatory studies,filing-enabling studies. In October 2025, we transitioned our discovery and development from 7423 to its parent molecule, 7272, which areis ongoing.currently in regulatory filing-enabling nonclinical studies.
In addition to our investigational therapy programs that have nominated development candidates and have advanced into clinical studies or CTA-enablingregulatory-filing enabling studies, our research team continues to actively focus on proprietary research to discover and developnominate novel antivirals to treat serious viral diseases.
In October 2023, we entered into an Option, License and Collaboration agreement (the Gilead Collaboration Agreement) with Gilead pursuant to which Gilead (1) exclusively licensed to us its HPI program and its NNPI program, while retaining opt-in rights to these programsprograms, and (2) has an option to take an exclusive license, on a program-by-program basis, to all of our other current and future pipeline programs. During the 12-year collaboration term (subject to payment of certain extension fees) and for a specified period thereafter, Gilead may exercise its opt-in rights, on a program-by-program basis, at one of two timepoints—completion of a certain Phase 1 study oror, upon payment of a deferral fee and completion of a certain Phase 2 study for the first product within the program—upon payment of an opt-in fee ranging from $45.0 million to $125.0 million per program depending on the type of program and when the option is exercised. Pursuant to the Gilead Collaboration Agreement, Gilead made an $84.8 million upfront cash payment to us. In December 2024, we and Gilead entered into the First Amendment to the Gilead Collaboration Agreement, which restructured the timing of specific options exercisable and the fees payable to us under the terms of the Gilead Collaboration Agreement due to an agreed upon development plan for 6250. To facilitate this development plan, (1) we received a payment of $10.0 million from Gilead and (2) the opt-in fee payable by Gilead in connection with 6250 was restructured, though it remains in the range of opt-in fees detailed above. The $10.0 million payment received in connection with the First Amendment to the Gilead Collaboration Agreement is creditable towards future collaboration-related payments payable by Gilead. This credit was applied toward Gilead’s opt-in fee paid for the HPI program in December 2025.
If Gilead exercises its opt-in right to any current or future program under the collaboration, we are eligible to receive up to $330.0 million in potential regulatory and commercial milestones on that program, in addition to royalties ranging from the high single-digits to high teens, depending on the clinical stage of the program at the time of the opt-in. Following Gilead’s exercise of its option for each program, we may opt inopt-in to cover 40% of the research and development costs in the United States and share 40% of the profits and operating loss in the United States for products within the program in lieu of receiving milestones and royalties for that program in the United States, unless we later opt out of the cost/profit share for the program. Prior to Gilead’s potential exercise of its opt-in, we are primarily responsible for all discovery, research and development on both our programs and the two Gilead-contributed programs. Following Gilead’s opt-in, Gilead will control the further discovery, research, development,development and commercialization on any optioned programs.programs, and is responsible for all related costs unless we opt in to share 40% of all costs and profits in the United States. During the term, Gilead will continue to support the collaboration through extension fees of $75.0 million in each of the third, fifth and seventh yearsanniversaries of the collaboration.
Gilead also participated in a financing transaction in August 2025 on the same terms as the new investors. We and Gilead entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement for the issuance and sale, in a private placement, of 2,295,920 shares of our common stock at a combined purchase price of $19.60 per shares and accompanying one-half of one Class A Warrant and one-half of one Class B Warrant (collectively, the August 2025 Private Placement). The common stock, the Class A Warrant and the Class B Warrant were sold to Gilead pursuant to the terms of the Investor Rights Agreement. The Class A Warrant and the Class B Warrant each provide for the right to purchase up to 1,147,960 shares of our common stock. The Class A Warrant has an exercise price of $21.60 per share, became immediately exercisable on the date of issuance and will expire on or prior to the earlier of (a) August 11, 2030 (five years from the date of issuance) and (b) the date that is 30 days after the public announcement that we have completed enrollment of at least 200 patients total for our Phase 2 clinical study evaluating 5366 versus valacyclovir. The Class B Warrant has an exercise price of $21.60 per share and is exercisable between November 15, 2026 and December 31, 2026. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if, prior to November 15, 2026, we publicly announce that we have received at least $75.0 million in the aggregate of non-dilutive capital in connection with a collaboration agreement, then the Class B Warrant automatically terminates in full.
In October 2025, as required under the registration rights terms of the Investor Rights Agreement, we filed a registration statement on Form S-3 (the Registration Statement) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to register all of the shares of our common stock that have been issued and sold to Gilead, as well as all of the shares of common stock underlying the warrants that have been issued and sold to Gilead. The SEC declared the Registration Statement effective in November 2025.
Option Exercise
In December 2025, Gilead exercised its option to exclusively license our HPI program for the treatment of recurrent genital herpes, including 5366 and 1179. This is the first program that Gilead will advance under the Gilead Collaboration.
Under the terms of the Gilead Collaboration Agreement, we received a $35 million payment in connection with Gilead’s exercise of our HPI program. The $35 million payment reflects a $45 million option fee, net of $10 million in accelerated funding that we received under the First Amendment to the Gilead Collaboration Agreement, which was creditable against future payments. Gilead received an exclusive license to 5366 and 1179 and will have the sole right and responsibility for further clinical development and commercialization of the HPI program.
We remain eligible to receive up to $330 million in regulatory and commercial milestones, as well as tiered royalties on net sales ranging from the high single-digits to low teens. We will also have the right to opt in to share 40% of all costs and profits in the United States (the Profit-Share) in lieu of receiving milestones and royalties for that program in the United States after receipt of a development plan and budget from Gilead.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
Largest changes
In October 2023, we entered into the Gilead Collaboration Agreement with Gilead, whereby Gilead exclusively licensed to us its HPI program and NNPI program, while retaining opt-in rights to these programs, and has an option to take an exclusive license, on a program-by-program basis, to all of our other current and future pipeline programs during the collaboration term. In connection with the entry into the Gilead Collaboration Agreement, we and Gilead also entered into a common stock purchase agreement and an investor rights agreement, which were both amended in June 2024. Also in June 2024, we and Gilead subsequently entered into a securities purchase agreement and warrant agreement. In December 2024, Gilead purchased additional shares of our common stock at a premium pursuant to the terms of the common stock purchase agreement, and we amended the Gilead Collaboration Agreement in connection with an updated development plan for 6250. In August 2025, Gilead purchased additional shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase additional shares of our common stock, and in May 2026, Gilead purchased additional shares of our common stock. In December 2025, Gilead exercised its option and took an exclusive license to our HPI program, and in March 2026, Gilead declined to exercise its option to license 4334 or defer its option until completion of Phase 2 studies. Our agreements and relationship with Gilead pose a number of risks, including, but not limited to, the following:see in full comparison
Gilead has the right to designate (and has designated) two directors for appointment to our board of directors pursuant to the terms of the investor rights agreement andsee in full comparisonownsowned approximately28%25.1% of our outstanding commonstock.stock as of June 30, 2026. Gilead also has the right to acquire additional shares in the open market, up to an amount resulting in Gilead owning a total of 35% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, Gilead may be able to exert significant influence over us.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (4)
In October 2023, we entered into the Gilead Collaboration Agreement with Gilead, whereby Gilead exclusively licensed to us its HPI program and NNPI program, while retaining opt-in rights to these programs, and has an option to take an exclusive license, on a program-by-program basis, to all of our other current and future pipeline programs during the collaboration term. In connection with the entry into the Gilead Collaboration Agreement, we and Gilead also entered into a common stock purchase agreement and an investor rights agreement, which were both amended in June 2024. Also in June 2024, we and Gilead subsequently entered into a securities purchase agreement and warrant agreement. In December 2024, Gilead purchased additional shares of our common stock at a premium pursuant to the terms of the common stock purchase agreement, and we amended the Gilead Collaboration Agreement in connection with an updated development plan for 6250. In August 2025, Gilead purchased additional shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase additional shares of our common stock, and in May 2026, Gilead purchased additional shares of our common stock. In December 2025, Gilead exercised its option and took an exclusive license to our HPI program, and in March 2026, Gilead declined to exercise its option to license 4334 or defer its option until completion of Phase 2 studies. Our agreements and relationship with Gilead pose a number of risks, including, but not limited to, the following:
Gilead has the right to designate (and has designated) two directors for appointment to our board of directors pursuant to the terms of the investor rights agreement and ownsowned approximately 28%25.1% of our outstanding common stock.stock as of June 30, 2026. Gilead also has the right to acquire additional shares in the open market, up to an amount resulting in Gilead owning a total of 35% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, Gilead may be able to exert significant influence over us.
business interruptions resulting from geopolitical actions such as the war between Russia and Ukraine, the conflicts in the Middle East, including the recent hostilities involving Iran, and in Venezuela, tensions between China and Taiwan, as well as trade tension and/or the imposition and enforceability of tariffs (including tariffs that have been or may be in the future imposed by the United States and other countries and uncertainties regarding the ability to obtain refunds for previously paid tariffs that have subsequently been invalidated), other wars, acts of terrorism, natural disasters or outbreaks of disease;
The pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries are intensely competitive. In addition, the clinical and commercial landscapes for recurrent genital herpes, HDV, CLD, HBV and transplant-related herpesviruses are rapidly changing; we expect new data from commercial and clinical-stage products to continue to emerge. We compete with organizations, some with significantly more resources, who are developing competitive product candidates. If our competitors develop effective treatments for recurrent genital herpes, HDV, CLD, HBV and transplant-related herpesviruses or any other indication or field we might pursue, and successfully commercialize those treatments, our business and prospects could be materially harmed.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”
New heading “Collaboration Revenue”
New heading “Research and Development Expenses”
New heading “General and Administrative Expenses”
New heading “Interest and Other Income, Net”
Largest changes
“We received Gilead’s clinical development plan and budget for the HPI program in June 2026. Gilead is also considering the possible evaluation of 1179 as part of a combination strategy with HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Our decision regarding the Profit-Share (as defined below) will be made after receipt and review of Gilead's commercial costs estimates, which will complete the opt-in package.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (73)
We are a biotechnology company developing innovative therapeutics targeting serious viral and liver diseases with the potential to improve the lives of patients worldwide. Our pipeline includes multiple clinical-stage investigational therapies, including: (1) two long-acting helicase-primase inhibitors (HPI) for the treatment of recurrent genital herpes, ABI-5366GS-5366 (5366) and ABI-1179GS-1179 (1179), which have been exclusively licensed to Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Gilead); (2) an orally bioavailable sodium taurocholate co-transporting peptide (NTCP) inhibitor, ABI-6250 (6250), for the treatment of (a) chronic hepatitis delta virus (HDV) entryinfection inhibitor, ABI-6250and (6250b) primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), both cholestatic liver diseases (CLD); and (3) a highly potent next-generation capsid assembly modulator (CAM) designed to disrupt the replication cycle of hepatitis B virus (HBV) at several key points, ABI-4334 (4334). Our pipeline also includes a novel, oral broad-spectrum non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitor (NNPI) for the treatment of transplant-related herpesviruses, ABI-7272 (7272), which is currently undergoing studies to enable a regulatory filing, and we have additional research programs against multiple antiviralviral and liver disease targets. In December 2025, pursuant to our collaboration with Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Gilead and the Gilead Collaboration), Gilead exercised its option to license our HPI program for the treatment of recurrent genital herpes, including our long-acting investigational candidates 1179 and 5366. For additional information regarding Gilead’s exercise of its option, see “Collaboration and License Agreement—Gilead Sciences, Inc.—Option Exercise.”
In the second quarter of 2026, we continued to progress each of our investigational product candidates, 5366, 1179, 6250 and 4334.
5366 and 1179 – The transition of the HPI program to Gilead is on-going. Gilead controls the clinical development of 5366 and 1179, and initiation of a Phase 2 study of 1179 is expected by the end of 2026. Gilead does not intend to develop 5366 further at this time.
o
We received Gilead’s clinical development plan and budget for the HPI program in June 2026. Gilead is also considering the possible evaluation of 1179 as part of a combination strategy with HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Our decision regarding the Profit-Share (as defined below) will be made after receipt and review of Gilead's commercial costs estimates, which will complete the opt-in package.
o
2025 was a pivotal year for us, as we reported data readouts for 5366, 1179, 6250 and 4334. We also nominated 7272 and advanced it into regulatory-enabling studies. In 2026, we continued to progress each of these investigational product candidates.
5366 and 1179 – All participants in the Phase 1a/b studies have completed dosing and follow up, reinforcing continued confidence in the safety and efficacy findings previously disclosed for both candidates. The transition of the HPI program to Gilead is on-going.
6250HDV – All participants in the Phase 1a study have completed dosing and follow up. Chronic toxicology studies have been completed, establishing supportPreparation for anticipateda Phase 2 doses. Preparation for Phase 2 clinical studiesstudy is on-going, with initiation expected in the fourth quarter of 2026.
o
CLD – Announced expansion of 6250 into PBC and PSC. Preparation for a Phase 2 study is on-going, with initiation expected in the first quarter of 2027. We conducted a pre-IND meeting with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the FDA) to discuss our planned development of 6250 in CLD. The official minutes from that meeting support advancement of the CLD program.
4334 – InitiatedContinuing process to identify potential partners that was initiated in the first quarter; we do not plan to advance 4334 further without a partner.
In addition, we completed a $115.0 million gross financing transaction that we expect to extend funding beyond our planned Phase 2 studies of 6250 in both HDV and CLD.
Based on the limitations of current therapies, we see a path to advancing the treatment paradigm for people suffering from recurrent genital herpes. To reach that goal, we discovered and began the clinical development of a novel, potent, long-acting HPI for recurrent genital herpes, 5366, which demonstrated low nanomolar potency in vitro against both HSV-1 and HSV-2 clinical isolates and a favorable nonclinical safety profile in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA)FDA's Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) toxicology studies. In addition, we began development of a second novel, potent, long-acting HPI for genital herpes, 1179, which was in-licensed to us as part of our collaboration with Gilead. As Gilead has exercised its option to exclusively license our HPI program, including 5366 and 1179, development willis benow in Gilead’s sole control following completion of the Phase 1a/b studies of 5366 and 1179, which we are managing until they are complete.1179. For additional information regarding the option exercise, see “Collaboration and License Agreements—Gilead Sciences, Inc.—Option Exercise.”
We reported interim data from the Phase 1b portion of the 5366 study in August 2025, focused on two different oral doses of 5366 administered on a once-weekly basis. For the powered antiviral endpoint, HSV-2 shedding rate, highly potent antiviral activity was observed with a 94% reduction compared to placebo (p<0.01) over the 29-day evaluation period in the cohort evaluating a 350 mg weekly dose. This reduction exceeded our target for the study of an 80-85% reduction in the rate of HSV-2 shedding. For a secondary clinical endpoint of virologically confirmed genital lesion rate, a 94%97% reduction compared to placebo (p<0.010.05) was observed with the 350 mg weekly dose. The rate of genital swabs with high viral load (i.e., >104 copies/mL HSV DNA), a potential surrogate for HSV-2 transmission and a secondary endpoint, was reduced by 98% compared to placebo (p<0.05) in this cohort.
All participants in the Phase 1b portion of the 5366 study have completed dosing and follow up. The observed PK profile continues to support once-weekly dosing and the potential for once-monthly oral dosing regimens. Additionally, all chronic toxicology studies have been completed. With these data, 5366 is ready to move into a Phase 2 clinical study.study; however, 5366 development is in Gilead's sole control and Gilead does not intend to develop 5366 further at this time.
The 5366 data reported in August and December 2025 waswere presented in an oral presentation and two poster presentations at the Congress of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) in Munich, Germany in April 2026.
InWe additionalso toconducted 5366,a Phase 1a/b clinical study of 1179, a structurally-differentiated HPIHPI, withwhich has single digit nanomolar potency against HSV-1 and HSV-2 and a nonclinical PK and safety profile to date that is supportive of a potential long-acting treatment by once-weekly oral administration is also in clinical development.administration. We reported interim data from two oral weekly dose cohorts in the Phase 1b portion of the 1179 study in December 2025. For the powered antiviral endpoint, HSV-2 shedding rate, highly potent antiviral activity was observed with a 98% reduction in HSV-2 shedding rate compared to placebo (p<0.01) over the 29-day evaluation period in the 50 mg weekly dose cohort. This reduction exceeded our target for the study of an 80-85% reduction in HSV-2 shedding rate. Further, data revealed a 91% reduction in virologically confirmed lesion rate compared to placebo (p<0.01) with the 50 mg weekly dose. There was also a >99% reduction in the number of samples with high viral load, a potential surrogate for HSV-2 transmission and a secondary endpoint.
All participants in the Phase 1b portion of the 1179 study have completed dosing and follow up. With these data, 1179 can move directly into a Phase 2 enabling studiesstudy for a once-weekly treatment regimen, subject to the completion of chronic toxicology studies, which are underway. The 1179 data reported in December 2025 was presented in a poster presentation at ESCMID in April 2026.
In December 2025, Gilead exercised its option early to license our HPI program for the treatment of recurrent genital herpes, including 5366 and 1179. We expect to receivereceived Gilead’s clinical development plan and budget for the HPI program andin makeJune our2026. The plan indicates that 1179 has been selected to advance, with a Phase 2 clinical study in participants with recurrent genital herpes expected to initiate by the end of 2026. Gilead is also considering the possible evaluation of 1179 as part of a combination strategy with HIV PrEP. Our decision regarding the Profit-Share (as defined below) bywill mid-2026.be Wemade anticipateafter Gileadreceipt and review of Gilead's commercial cost estimates, which will initiate a Phase 2 clinical study forcomplete the HPIopt-in program in 2026.package. For more information regarding Gilead’s exercise of its option, see “Collaboration and License Agreement—Gilead Sciences, Inc.—Option Exercise.”
Our HBVLiver and HDVDisease Programs
HDV and HBV
The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 254240 million people worldwide arewere chronically infected with HBV as of 2022,2024, and 1.20.9 million new infections occur each year. HBV is a leading global cause of chronic liver disease and liver transplants, and the WHO estimates that 1.1 million people died in 20222024 from HBV, mostly due to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.carcinoma (primary liver cancer). Of the 254240 million people living with chronic HBV infection, only approximately 3365 million, or 13%,27%, were aware of their infection, and only approximately 710 million, or 3%,4%, of those diagnosed received treatment. HBV is a highly prevalent disease that infects almost three times the number of people infected with hepatitis C virus and HIV infections combined, according to the WHO.
HDV is a “satellite virus” of HBV because it can only infect people (1) who are already infected with HBV or (2) at the same time as a person is infected with HBV. HDV affects a subset of approximately 12 to 72 million HBV infected people. These individuals infected with HDV, which comprise an estimated 4.5%nearly 5% of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive individuals, experience a substantially increased disease burden, as they account for 18% of cirrhosis and 20% of hepatocellular carcinoma associated with HBV. HDV is considered the most severe form of hepatitis, as 70% of individuals infected with HDV progress to cirrhosis within ten years. While HDV is less prevalent in the United States, it is a significant and serious health problem with inadequate treatment in many parts of Europe, Africa, the Middle East, East Asia and parts of South America. HDV may be significantly underdiagnosed, because there were no HDV-targeted therapies approved until very recently, and the first HDV-targeted therapy approved is only approved in the European Economic Area (EEA), the UK, Switzerland, AustraliaAustralia, Canada and Canada.the United States. HDV is known to accelerate disease progression and increase the incidence of liver cirrhosis and liver cancer, which results in higher morbidity and mortality rates than HBV alone.
The current standard of care treatment for HDV is off-label pegylated interferon-α (IFN-α) injected weekly or, in the EEA, the UK, Switzerland, AustraliaAustralia, Canada and Canada,the United States, a large, complex peptide inhibitor that requires daily injections, bulevirtide. There are no approved HDV treatments in the United States. We believe a safe and effective oral small molecule entry inhibitor would be a significant innovation for people living with HDV, who face a significant and immediate disease burden.
HDV is a small RNA virus that encodes just two viral proteins and relies on host enzymes as well as the HBsAg from HBV to replicate, which limits the number of HDV-specific antiviral targets. Similar to HBV, HDV utilizes HBsAg to enter hepatocytes by binding the cellular transmembrane proteinprotein, sodium taurocholate co-transporting peptide (NTCP).NTCP. NTCP is highly expressed on human hepatocytes, where it serves as one of several proteins involved in the transport of bile acids. The binding of specific small or large molecules to NTCP has been shown to effectively inhibit the interaction of HBsAg with NTCP, which prevents HBV and HDV from infecting hepatocytes.
The inhibition of HBV and HDV infection by molecules that bind NTCP has been demonstrated in vitro, in animal models and clinically. Notably, bulevirtide, a peptide inhibitor of NTCP, is the only approved therapy for HDV. 6250 has the same clinically-validated MOA as bulevirtide. The binding of NTCP-targeted HBV/HDV entry inhibitors to NTCP has also been shown to inhibit the transport of certain bile acids into cells, which results in plasma elevations of bile acids; this effect has been well-tolerated clinically and may serve as a biomarker of pharmacologically active concentrations of drug in the plasma.
A Phase 1aTop-line clinical studydata, of 6250 was initiated in the fourth quarter of 2024, and in August 2025, we announced interimincluding PK, biomarker and safety data fromfor single-ascendingthe andPhase multiple-ascending1a dosesstudy of 6250 was presented at the European Association for the Study of the Liver Congress that took place in Barcelona, Spain in May 2026. Across all cohorts in healthy participants. Across the cohorts evaluated to date,, a mean half-life of approximately four days was observed for 6250 when dosed orally, supporting the once-daily oral dosing profile target. Given this half-life, accumulation was observed in the multiple-dose cohorts with exposures on the last day of dosing generally reaching six- to seven-foldeight-fold higher than the exposure seen after the first dose.
One Grade 2 alanine transminase (ALT) elevation was observed in the cohort evaluating the highest single-dose level of 25 mg. In this cohort, off-target engagement of other liver transporters was also seen as indicated by elevated CP-1 levels. Grade 1 ALT elevations were observed at a low frequency across the other cohorts.cohorts, including placebo. All ALT elevations were self-limited, and none were accompanied with elevations in bilirubin or other markers of liver injury. The elevations resolved in the study period with ongoing drug exposure due to 6250's four-day half-life.
All participants in the Phase 1a study have completed dosing and follow up. The chronic toxicology studies to enable longer term dosing are complete, and we are preparing for Phase 2 clinical studies, with Phase 2 initiation expected in the fourth quarter of 2026. In addition, we expect to initiate additional Phase 1 pharmacology studies to support labeling anticipated to start in the fourth quarter of 2026.
6250 Phase 1a data will be presented at the European Association for the Study of the Liver Congress taking place in Barcelona, Spain in May 2026.
A Phase 1a study demonstrated that 4334 was well-tolerated when administered orally as single or multiple doses. During the second quarter of 2024, we dosed our first participant in a Phase 1b clinical study of 4334. We reported interim clinical results from the initial 150 mg cohort in December 2024, and topline clinical resultsresults, including a subsequent 400 mg cohort in June 2025. In both the 150 mg and 400 mg cohorts, 4334 continued to show a half-life supportive of once-daily oral dosing. In addition, results for both cohorts indicated that 4334 maintained clinical exposures multiple folds above those anticipated to be required for potent viral activity and inhibition of cccDNA formation. Mean declines in HBV DNA of 2.9 log10 IU/mL and 3.2 log10 IU/mL were observed over 28 days in a population of predominately HBeAg negative participants receiving 150 mg and 400 mg, respectively. Among the subset of participants with detectable HBV RNA at baseline, mean declines of 2.5 log10 U/mL and 2.3 log10 U/mL were observed over 28 days in the participants receiving 150 mg and 400 mg, respectively. As anticipated, limited changes in viral antigens were observed for the study population over the 28-day treatment period. These antiviral data are consistent with the high potency seen preclinically for 4334. The safety data also demonstrated that 4334 was well-tolerated with a favorable safety profile observed. The 400 mg cohort was the final cohort for this Phase 1b study and final data was presented at the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease, The Liver Meeting® in November 2025.
In March 2026, Gilead declined to either exercise its option to license 4334 or defer its option until completion of Phase 2 studies. As a result, we retain full control of 4334, including the right to evaluate partnering opportunities for 4334 outside of the Gilead Collaboration. We are actively evaluating partnering opportunities for 4334 and have initiated a process to find potential partners. We do not plan to advance 4334 further without a partner.
PBC and PSC
PBC and PSC are chronic, autoimmune CLDs characterized by impaired bile flow, accumulation of bile acids in the liver and progressive liver damage. Clinical symptoms for both PBC and PSC include itch and fatigue, with development of fibrosis and cirrhosis as the diseases progress.
PBC affects intrahepatic bile ducts, with complications including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. PBC is also associated with Sjogren’s Syndrome. There are approximately 150,000 adults diagnosed with PBC in the United States, and approximately 40% of patients fail first line therapy. There are multiple therapies available for the treatment of PBC; however, a significant percentage of individuals have an inadequate response to these treatments, and there remains an unmet medical need for improved treatment of PBC.
PSC affects intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts, and has complications including cirrhosis, cholangiocarcinoma and cholangitis. PSC is also associated with inflammatory bowel disease. There are approximately 30,000 adults diagnosed with PSC in the United States. The ten-year overall mortality rate for PSC patients is approximately 35%. We believe there is a significant unmet medical need for the management of PSC as there are currently no approved therapies.
Nonclinical data with 6250 demonstrate potent inhibition of bile acid uptake in liver cells, a mechanism directly relevant to CLD, where bile acid accumulation drives liver inflammation and liver injury. In addition, animal studies as well as the Phase 1a study with 6250 demonstrated elevations in serum bile acids, which we believe to be a biomarker for NTCP engagement that reflects reductions of bile acids in the liver.
In May 2026, we announced that we expanded 6250 clinical development beyond HDV into CLD, targeting PBC and PSC. Further, we conducted a pre-IND meeting with the FDA to discuss our planned development of 6250 in CLD. Official meeting minutes support advancement of the CLD program. We are preparing for Phase 2 clinical studies, with Phase 2 initiation expected in the first quarter of 2027.
In addition to our investigational therapy programs that have nominated development candidates and have advanced into clinical studies or regulatory-filing enabling studies, our research team continues to actively focus on proprietary research to discover and nominate novel antiviralsmolecules to treat serious viral and liver diseases.
In October 2023, we entered into an Option, License and Collaboration agreement (the Gilead Collaboration Agreement) with Gilead pursuant to which Gilead (1) exclusively licensed to us its HPI program and its NNPI program, while retaining opt-in rights to these programs, and (2) has an option to take an exclusive license, on a program-by-program basis, to all of our other current and future pipeline programs. During the 12-year collaboration term (subject to payment of certain extension fees) and for a specified period thereafter, Gilead may exercise its opt-in rights, on a program-by-program basis, at one of two timepoints—completion of a certain Phase 1 study or, upon payment of a deferral fee and completion of a certain Phase 2 study for the first product within the program—upon payment of an opt-in fee ranging from $45.0 million to $125.0 million per program depending on the type of program and when the option is exercised. Pursuant to the Gilead Collaboration Agreement, Gilead made an $84.8 million upfront cash payment to us. In December 2024, we and Gilead entered into the First Amendment to the Gilead Collaboration Agreement, which restructured the timing of specific options exercisable and the fees payable to us under the terms of the Gilead Collaboration Agreement due to an agreed upon development plan for 6250. To facilitate this development plan, (1) we received a payment of $10.0 million from Gilead and (2) the opt-in fee payable by Gilead in connection with 6250 was restructured, though it remains in the range of opt-in fees detailed above. The $10.0 million payment received in connection with the First Amendment to the Gilead Collaboration Agreement iswas creditable towards future collaboration-related payments payable by Gilead.Gilead This creditand was applied toward Gilead’s opt-in fee paid for the HPI program in December 2025.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, Gilead held (1) approximately 28.4%25.1% of our outstanding common stock, (2) a warrant to purchase up to 179,500 shares of our common stock at a price of $17.00 per share, which was acquired in a financing transaction in 2024 (the 2024 Warrant), (3) a Class A warrant to purchase up to 1,147,960 shares of our common stock at a price of $21.60 per share (Class A Warrant), which was acquired in a financing transaction in 2025 (the 2025 Financing) and (4) a Class B Warrant to purchase up to 1,147,960 shares of our common stock at a price of $21.60 per share (Class B Warrant), which was also acquired in the 2025 Financing. The 2024 Warrant is exercisable and expires on June 18, 2029. The Class A Warrant is also exercisable and expires on or prior to the earlier of (a) August 11, 2030 (five years from the date of issuance) and (b) the date that is 30 days after the public announcement that we have completed enrollment of at least 200 patients for our Phase 2 clinical study evaluating 5366 versus valacyclovir. The Class B Warrant is exercisable between November 15, 2026 and December 31, 2026, provided that if, prior to November 15, 2026, we publicly announce that we have received at least $75.0 million in the aggregate of non-dilutive capital in connection with a collaboration agreement, then the Class B Warrant automatically terminates in full.
We received Gilead's clinical development plan and budget for the HPI program in June 2026. The plan indicates that 1179 has been selected to advance, with a Phase 2 clinical study in participants with recurrent genital herpes expected to initiate by the end of 2026. Gilead is also considering the possible evaluation of 1179 as part of a combination strategy with HIV PrEP. Our decision regarding whether to exercise our right to opt in to share 40% of all costs and profits in the United States (the Profit-Share) in lieu of receiving milestones and royalties for that program in the United States will be made after receipt and review of Gilead's commercial cost estimates, which will complete the opt-in package. If we opt in to the Profit-Share, we remain eligible to receive up to $280 million in regulatory and commercial milestones, as well as tiered royalties on net sales ranging from the high single-digits to low teens.
We remain eligible to receive up to $330 million in regulatory and commercial milestones, as well as tiered royalties on net sales ranging from the high single-digits to low teens. We will also have the right to opt in to share 40% of all costs and profits in the United States (the Profit-Share) in lieu of receiving milestones and royalties for that program in the United States after receipt of a development plan and budget from Gilead.
Comparison of the Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025
Collaboration revenue was $8.2$13.4 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to $9.4$9.6 million for the same period in 2025. The $1.2$3.7 million decreaseincrease reflects the timing of activities performed and progress toward completion of services under the Gilead Collaboration Agreement.Agreement, and includes a $5.1 million cumulative catch-up adjustment recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2026 related to updated estimates of future activities under the collaboration.
Research and development expenses consist primarily of employee-related expenses, fees paid to contract resourceresearch organizations and contract manufacturing organizations, lab supplies and other third-party expenses that support our research and discovery, nonclinical and clinical activities. External program costs represent a significant portion of our research and development expenses, which we track by product candidate once it has been nominated. We use our employee and infrastructure resources, as well as certain third-party costs, across multiple research and development programs, and we do not specifically allocate these costs to our programs.
Amounts for 6250 include shared external program expenses supporting both the HDV and CLD indications. External program expenses directly attributable to a specific indication are reflected separately within the applicable HDV and CLD amounts.
(1)
In October 2025, we transitioned our discovery and development from ABI-7423 to its parent molecule, 7272, which is currently in regulatory filing-enabling preclinical studies.
Research and development expenses remained flat atwere $14.9 million for both the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 andcompared to $16.1 million for the same period in 2025. Employee-relatedThe expenses$1.2 increasedmillion due to higher headcount, annual salary adjustments, and stock-based compensation expense associated with performance-based restricted stock units granted in mid-2025. This increasedecrease was partiallyprimarily offsetdriven by lower external program expenses, whichparticularly mostlyfor decreased5366, due toreflecting the completion of clinical trials,trials and lower manufacturing and toxicology study costs, partially offset by increases in our research and discovery efforts.efforts and higher employee-related expenses due to increased headcount, annual salary adjustments and stock-based compensation expense related to performance-based restricted stock units granted in mid-2025.
General and administrative expenses were $4.7$4.8 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to $4.5$4.6 million for the same period in 2025. The $0.2 million increase was primarily driven by an increase inhigher stock-based compensation expense associated with performance-based restricted stock units granted in mid-2025.mid-2025, partially offset by lower professional fees related to patent filings.
Interest and other income, net was $2.3$2.5 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $1.1$0.9 million for the same period in 2025. The $1.2$1.6 million increase was primarily due to a larger portfolio balance followingresulting from the investment of cash proceeds from our financing transactiontransactions completed in August 2025,2025 asand wellMay as2026 proceeds received fromand the $35.0collaboration milliontransaction payment from Gilead for an exclusive license to our HPI programcompleted in December 2025.
Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025
Collaboration Revenue
The following table summarizes the period-over-period changes in our collaboration revenue (in thousands, except for percentages):
Collaboration revenue was $21.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to $19.0 million for the same period in 2025. The $2.5 million increase reflects the timing of activities performed and progress toward completion of services under the Gilead Collaboration Agreement, and includes a $5.1 million cumulative catch-up adjustment recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2026 related to updated estimates of future activities under the collaboration.
Research and Development Expenses
The following table summarizes the period-over-period changes in our research and development expenses (in thousands, except for percentages):
Amounts for 6250 include shared external program expenses supporting both the HDV and CLD indications. External program expenses directly attributable to a specific indication are reflected separately within the applicable HDV and CLD amounts.
ASMB insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 1 filing (1 insider, 1 trade date, 29 shares, about $674). Net open-market shares: -29 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$674.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-17 | Bjorkquist Jeanette M |
Open-market sale | 29 | $23.25 | $674 |
| 2026-05-26 | Gilead Sciences, Inc. |
Grant/award | 471,698 | $26.50 | $12.5M |
| 2026-03-29 | Gaggar Anuj |
Grant/award | 14,000 | — | — |
| 2026-03-29 | White Nicole S |
Grant/award | 14,000 | — | — |
| 2026-03-29 | Bjorkquist Jeanette M |
Grant/award | 3,500 | — | — |
| 2026-03-29 | Delaney William E Iv |
Grant/award | 14,000 | — | — |
| 2026-03-29 | Okazaki Jason A |
Grant/award | 50,750 | — | — |
Well-known investors holding ASMB (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 460,593 | $12.7M | 0.02% | Added 34% |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 298,807 | $8.2M | 0.01% | Added 28% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 95,907 | $2.6M | 0.0% | Added 277% |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 39,441 | $1.1M | 0.0% | Added 152% |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 17,858 | $490.7K | 0.0% | Reduced 13% |