AVA 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Avista Corp. · NYSE · Electric & Other Services Combined · CIK 104918 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Lack of control over facilities under PPAs could impact power supply costs”
New heading “Problems with the transition, design or implementation of our new enterprise resource planning system could interfere with our business and operations, and adversely affect our financial condition.”
New heading “The expanded adoption of artificial intelligence has the potential to increase exposure to cyberattacks and negatively impact business operations.”
New heading “Non-regulated investments in businesses outside of our core utilities operations may increase earnings volatility and can be difficult to sell due to their illiquid nature.”
New heading “Resource Adequacy Risk Factors”
New heading “Multiple factors are influencing the ability to source and deliver adequate energy to meet customer demand, which could lead to power and gas market liquidity risks.”
Largest changes
“The expanded adoption of artificial intelligence has the potential to increase exposure to cyberattacks and negatively impact business operations.”see in full comparison
“Multiple factors are influencing the ability to source and deliver adequate energy to meet customer demand, which could lead to power and gas market liquidity risks.”see in full comparison
“We may hedge a portion of our interest rate risk with financial derivative instruments, which may require the posting of collateral. If market interest rates decrease below the interest rates we have locked in, this will result in a liability related to our interest rate swap derivatives, which can be significant. We may be required to post cash or letters of credit as collateral depending on fluctuations in the fair value of the derivative instruments. …”see in full comparison
“Problems with the transition, design or implementation of our new enterprise resource planning system could interfere with our business and operations, and adversely affect our financial condition.”see in full comparison
“Non-regulated investments in businesses outside of our core utilities operations may increase earnings volatility and can be difficult to sell due to their illiquid nature.”see in full comparison
“The adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) is driving demand for energy while also presenting opportunities and unique risks to the utility business. AI enabled tools are proving to increase efficiency and add value to daily work processes as the use and adoption continues to expand. While use cases to drive efficiencies through AI develop, cyber attackers are targeting the tools and systems used to create the efficiencies, requiring enhanced analytics and monitoring. Reliance on AI generated information and data may enhance the exposure risk over time.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (27)
Avista Utilities' annual operating expenses and the costs associated with incremental investments in utility assets continue to grow at a faster rate than revenue. Our ability to recover these expenses and capital costs depends on the adequacy and timeliness of retail rate increases allowed by regulatory agencies, as well as managing costs. We expect to periodically file for rate increases with regulatory agencies to recover our expenses and capital costs and provide an opportunity to earn a reasonable rate of return for shareholders. If regulators do not grant rate increases or grant substantially lower rate increases than our requests in the future or if recovery of deferred expenses is disallowed, or if regulators do not allow us to recover costs associated with assets required to be retired or divested, such as Colstrip,divested to comply with emerging laws and regulations, it could have a negative effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. See further discussion of regulatory matters in “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis – Regulatory Matters.”
severe weather or natural disasters, including, but not limited to, avalanches, wind storms, wildfires, earthquakes, floods, snow and ice storms, and heat waves due to normal weather variations as well as the impacts of climate change which could disrupt energy generation, transmission and distribution, as well as the availability and costs of materials, equipment, supplies, support services and general business operations, blackouts or disruptions of interconnected transmission systems (the regional power grid), unplanned outages at generating plants, changes in the availability and cost of purchased power, fuel and natural gas, including delivery constraints and restrictions imposed by the transition to renewable and/or non-emitting energy sources, which can disrupt service to customers, explosions, fires, accidents, or mechanical breakdowns that could occur while operating and maintaining our generation, transmission and distribution systems, including, but not limited to, increased risk associated with emerging renewable technologies as these technologies continue to mature, property damage or injuries to third parties caused by our generation, transmission and distribution systems, dam failure at a company-owned hydroelectric facility, natural disasters that can disrupt energy generation, transmission and distribution, and general business operations, terrorist attacks or other malicious acts that may disrupt or cause damage to our utility assets or the vendors we utilize, and increased costs or delay of capital projects associated with the ability of suppliers, vendors or contractors to perform, general workforce problems, including decreased employee engagement, which may impact strategy execution and negatively affect retention, ability to attract workers, and result in challenges in collective bargaining, possible work stoppages, and strikes. Retention of employees may also be negatively impacted by early retirements, insufficient remote work opportunities, and higher pay offered by other employers. Attractions of employees to support strategies may be affected by higher pay offered from other companies, more liberal remote work opportunities offered by other employers, and other work-life balance benefits afforded by other companies.
Damage to facilities could be caused by severe weather or natural disasters, such as snow, ice, wind storms, floods, wildfires, earthquakes or avalanches. The cost toof implementimplementing rapid response or repair to such facilities can be significant. Overhead electric lines are most susceptible to damage caused by severe weather and are not covered by insurance.
Our generation, transmission and distribution assets and the systems that monitor and operate these assets are critical infrastructure for providing service to our customers. Security threats are continuing to evolve, and our industry has beenis subject to, and will likely continue to be subject to, attempts to disrupt operations. Significant destruction or interruption of these assets and systems could prevent us from fulfilling our critical business functions, including delivering energy to customers. This could result in experiencing a loss of revenues and/or additional costs to replace or restore assets and systems, and may increase costs associated with heightened security requirements.
Lack of control over facilities under PPAs could impact power supply costs
Generating facilities not owned by us, whose output we acquire under a PPA, could be foreclosed on by creditors of the owner, even though we are performing under the terms of the PPA. This could result in either an increase in the price to be paid by us, or the output of the facilities being diverted from us and sold to other parties.
Problems with the transition, design or implementation of our new enterprise resource planning system could interfere with our business and operations, and adversely affect our financial condition.
We are in the process of planning for the implementation of a new cloud-based enterprise resource planning system, which will take multiple years to complete. See further information on the enterprise resource planning system within “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis – Executive Overview”. There are transitional risks associated with the implementation, which may include loss of data in the conversion from on-premises systems to the cloud, difficulty compiling data for external reporting requirements, costs increasing throughout the project, or other challenges in our business operations. Difficulties faced during the transition could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The expanded adoption of artificial intelligence has the potential to increase exposure to cyberattacks and negatively impact business operations.
The adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) is driving demand for energy while also presenting opportunities and unique risks to the utility business. AI enabled tools are proving to increase efficiency and add value to daily work processes as the use and adoption continues to expand. While use cases to drive efficiencies through AI develop, cyber attackers are targeting the tools and systems used to create the efficiencies, requiring enhanced analytics and monitoring. Reliance on AI generated information and data may enhance the exposure risk over time.
AI driven solutions will be essential to compete in the marketplace, whether it be for material or energy procurement, or financial transactions, AI will accelerate data driven decision making. Therefore, AI literacy is essential. Not advancing the understanding and use of AI may compromise the operational and financial progress of the Company.
disruptive innovations in the marketplace may outpace our ability to compete or manage our risk (including the transition to renewable and/or non-emitting energy resources), customers may have a choice in the future over the sources from which to receive their energyenergy, and we may not be able to compete, potential difficulties in integrating acquired operations and in realizing expected opportunities, diversions of management resources and losses of key employees, challenges with respect to operating new businesses and other unanticipated risks and liabilities, reduced control over generation resources resulting from reliance on contract power from third-party owners of generation assets, which could limit our ability to balance resources with demand, non-regulated investments in businesses outside of our core utilities operations may increase earnings volatility, market or other conditions that could adversely affect our operations or require changes to our business strategy and could result in reduced assets and net income, affordability of electric and/or gas services may be a challenge for customers resulting in increased delayed payment for utility services, potential reputational risk arising from repeated general rate case filings, degradation in the quality of service, or from failed strategic investments and opportunities, which could erode shareholder, customer and community satisfaction with the Company, and the risk of municipalization or other form of service territory reduction.
Non-regulated investments in businesses outside of our core utilities operations may increase earnings volatility and can be difficult to sell due to their illiquid nature.
The fair values of our respective equity investments fluctuate from period to period, and such changes in fair value directly affect our net income. While we make these investments after prudent analysis and with the expectation of eventual financial gains, there is no assurance these investments will ultimately be successful. A significant portion of our investment portfolio consists of equity interests in privately held companies, which are inherently illiquid due to a lack of established market. Liquidity events are largely outside of our control, and may not occur on a timely basis (or may never occur). In addition, it is likely the value of these investments will continue to fluctuate as the businesses continue to mature, causing corresponding changes in our net income. The risks faced by these businesses may differ from the risks faced by our utility operations.
Legislative, regulatory and advocacy efforts at the local, state, national and international levels concerning climate change and other environmental issues could have significant impacts on our operations. The electric and natural gas utility industries are frequently affected by proposals to curb greenhouse gas and other air emissions. Various regulatory and legislative proposals have been made to limit or further restrict byproducts of combustion, including thatthose resulting from the use of natural gas by our customers. In addition, there are regulatory and legislative initiatives that have been passed which are designed to limit greenhouse gas emissions and increase the use of renewable sources of energy. In addition, regulatory and legislative initiatives may restrict customers' access to natural gas and/or require or limit natural gas infrastructure in buildings. Other initiatives may seek to promote social interests expressed as energy equity, environmental justice or similar frameworks. Such legislation could direct and/or restrict the operation and raise the costs of our power generation resources and energy delivery infrastructure as well as the distribution of natural gas to our customers.
We expect continuing legislative and regulatory activity in the futurefuture, and we are evaluating the extent to which potential changes to environmental laws and regulations may:
The price of power tends to be lower during periods with excess supply, such as the spring when hydroelectric conditions are usually at their maximum and various facilities are required to operate to meet environmental mandates. Oversupply can be exacerbated when intermittent resources such as wind generation are producingproduce output that may be supported by price subsidies. In extreme situations, we may be required to sell excess energy at negative prices.
We rely on regular access to financial marketsmarkets, but we cannot assure favorable or reasonable financing terms will be available when we need them.
Access to capital markets is critical to our operations and our capital structure. We have significant capital requirements that we expect to fund, in part, by accessing capital markets. As such, the state of financial markets and credit availability in the global, United States and regional economies impactsimpact our financial condition. We could experience increased borrowing costs or limited access to capital on reasonable terms.
We may hedge a portion of our interest rate risk with financial derivative instruments, which may require the posting of collateral. If market interest rates decrease below the interest rates we have locked in, this will result in a liability related to our interest rate swap derivatives, which can be significant. We may be required to post cash or letters of credit as collateral depending on fluctuations in the fair value of the derivative instruments. Settlement of interest rate swap derivative instruments in a liability position could require a significant amount of cash, which could negatively impact our liquidity and short-term credit availability and increase interest expense over the term of the associated debt.
We have concentrations of suppliers and customers in the electric and natural gas industriesindustries, including:
We are a participant in the EIM, and engage in direct and indirect power purchase and sale transactions in connection with that participation. The EIM collateral posting requirements are based on established credit criteria, but there is no assurance the collateral will be sufficient to cover obligations that counterparties may owe each other in the EIMEIM, and credit losses could be allocated among all EIM participants, including us. A significant failure of a participant in the EIM to make payments when due on its obligations are due could have a ripple effect on our counterparties in the power and gas markets if those counterparties experience ancillary liquidity issues, and could result in a decline in the ability of our counterparties to perform on their obligations.
We hedge a portion of our energy commodity risk with physical and financial derivative instruments that may require the posting of collateral. When we enter into fixed price energy commodity transactions for future delivery, we are subject to credit terms that may require us to provide collateral to wholesale counterparties related to the difference between currentforward prices and the agreed upon fixed prices. These collateral requirements can place significant demands on our cash flows or borrowing arrangements. Price volatility can cause collateral requirements to change quickly and significantly.
Generation plants may become obsolete. We rely on a variety of generation and energy commodity market sources to fulfill our obligation to serve customers and meet the demands of our counterparty agreements. Some of our generation sources, such as coal, may become obsolete or be prematurely retired through regulatory action or legislation. This could result in higher commodity costs to replace the lost generation, as well as higher costs to retire the generation source before the end of its expected life. This also includes costs (including replacement of lost generation) associated with our transfer of Colstrip ownership to NorthWestern at the endas of 2025.January 1, 2026. See “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis – Environmental Issues and Contingencies” for discussion regarding environmental and other issues surrounding Colstrip.
Resource Adequacy Risk Factors
Multiple factors are influencing the ability to source and deliver adequate energy to meet customer demand, which could lead to power and gas market liquidity risks.
Local and regional factors may occur and impact our ability to meet energy needs during periods of high demand or unplanned events. Locally, some combination of factors such as unanticipated load growth, unforeseen localized climatic changes, decreases in water availability for hydro generation, and prolonged unplanned generation outages could result in being short the energy we need to meet customer demand. External to localized conditions and events, the regional wholesale market, to which we would turn to purchase energy to meet short-term shortfalls, has become strained during regional events. If the northwest region does not build sufficient new generation capacity and additional transmission and gas transport, there is a risk that we will not be able to depend on excess energy market purchases to meet customer demand during extreme weather events. These factors are increasing the risk of potential regional energy supply shortages and the ability for us to access additional energy during periods of high demand or unplanned events.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “2025 Request for Proposal (RFP)”
New heading “2026 Customer Load”
New heading “Tariffs on Imports”
New heading “U.S. Reconciliation Bill”
New heading “Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Project”
New heading “2026 General Rate Cases”
New heading “Future Oregon General Rate Cases”
New heading “Non-Regulated Investments”
New heading “EPA Endangerment Finding Revocation”
New heading “2025 Presidential Executive Actions”
New heading “Resource Adequacy Risk”
Removed heading “Peak Load Requirements”
Removed heading “Annual Energy Requirements”
Removed heading “Washington Climate Commitment Act”
Removed heading “Potential Tariffs on Imports”
Removed heading “2022 General Rate Cases”
Removed heading “2023 General Rate Case”
Removed heading “Non-Regulated Investments and Capital Expenditures”
Removed heading “Utility Customer and Load Growth”
Removed heading “2025 Presidential Executive Action”
Largest changes
“Since taking office, the U.S. President's Administration has issued a multitude of Executive Orders directed towards national energy resources and development. …”see in full comparison
“Washington law requires utilities to file MYRPs of a minimum of two and up to four years. The law allows utilities filing a rate plan of 3 or 4 years the option to file a new rate plan for the third year and fourth year. Under this provision, we have the opportunity to address the numerous unpredictable factors that could materially affect our financial position over a longer-term rate plan. These risks include, but are not limited to, inflation, interest rate volatility, labor and benefits challenges, escalating capital costs, and other unforeseen cost drivers. …”see in full comparison
“Under the terms of interest rate swap derivatives that we enter into periodically, we may be required to post cash or letters of credit as collateral depending on fluctuations in the fair value of the instrument. As of December 31, 2024, we had one interest rate swap agreement outstanding with a notional amount totaling $10 million and we had deposited no cash as collateral for these interest rate swap derivatives. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (218)
Net income increased primarily due to the effects of general rate cases. This increase in earnings was partially offset by increases in other operating expenses, depreciation and amortization expense, taxes other than income taxes and interest expense. The increase in net income was also partially offset by a $9 million refund to be issued to customers for adjustments related to Colstrip investments. See "Regulatory Matters" for further details regarding the Colstrip final order. In addition, increased investment losses associated with lower valuations of certain investments in our portfolio decreased net income at our other businesses when compared to 2024.
More detailed explanations of the fluctuations are provided in the results of operations and business segment discussions (Avista Utilities, AEL&P, and the other businesses). that follow this summary.
Peak Load Requirements
Extreme weather events, both in summer and winter, have recently occurred in the Pacific Northwest. These events have resulted in system load peaks that were higher than anticipated. Historically, we have had excess capacity as compared to peak load, but during some extreme eventsevents, we have had to purchase short-term energy from the wholesale market to meet demand when our energy resources were not operating at full capacity or were otherwise unavailable. These weather events have highlighted the growing need for additional generating capacity both on our system and in the Pacific Northwest region. Accordingly, we are taking the increased peaks in demand into account as we consider our resource adequacy and generation requirements.
Annual Energy Requirements
The transition to clean energy (including the replacement of emitting facilities with non-emitting facilities, which are impacted by conditions outside of our control), and electrification, combined with expected load growth, and the transfer of our interest in Colstrip, also factor into the analysis of the need for additional generation.
2025 IRP
Our 2025 IRP was filed with the WUTC and IPUC in December 2024. While the IRP is subject to change from time to time due to changing circumstances, assumptions and projections, given the exit of Colstrip (222 MW) from our system by December 31, 2025 and the expected retirement of the Northeast CT (65 MW) in 2030, our preferred resource strategy includes the addition of approximately 490 MW of generating capacity by 2030 and a total addition of approximately 950 MW through 2035. We believe the additional capacity would likely consist primarily of wind resources and a natural gas combustion turbine. The new capacity would likely be a combination of resources owned by the Company and resources committed under PPAs, to be determined on a case-by-case basis depending upon financial, tax and regulatory considerations. See “Part I, Item 1. Business – Company Overview – Future Resource Needs” for further discussion of the IRP.
We also expectsee the need for expanded transmission infrastructure willto provide access to additional resources and improve reliability in our region. WeIn November 2024, we signed a non-binding memorandum of understanding to join the North Plains Connector transmission line project,project constructingthat plans to construct a transmission line from Bismarck, North Dakota to Colstrip, Montana.
2024Current Hydroelectric GenerationConditions and Outlook
Due to precipitation and warm weather, our hydroelectric generation in January and February (to date) has been above normal. Due to the warm weather, the average current level of snowpack in the areas serving our hydroelectric facilities is below normal. The amount of hydroelectric generation over the rest of the year will be affected not only by current snowpack levels but also by prevailing temperatures (which affect the timing and speed of run-off) and the volume, timing and form of precipitation. On balance, we expect the amount of hydroelectric generation for the entire year will be approximately at the normal level. While our current hydro forecast shows normal levels of generation, even if we were above or below normal, there would be no material change to our position in the ERM.
2025 Request for Proposal (RFP)
Our 2025 electric IRP was filed with the WUTC and IPUC in December 2024, and identified needs for additional generating capacity. In May 2025, we issued a request for proposal to add energy and capacity to meet projected resource needs. We selected a list of projects and will begin contract negotiations for the following:
a self-build upgrade of our existing Natural Gas Combustion Turbines at Rathdrum CT to add 14 MW of capacity without increasing carbon emissions. This upgrade will occur in two stages with the first occurring in 2027 and the second in 2029, a project for 100 MW, 4-hour Battery Energy Storage System, to be built and transferred to the Company in eastern Washington with a target date in 2028, a PPA for approximately 200 MW of wind power from Montana that utilizes our share of the Colstrip Transmission System with a target date in 2029, and the addition of approximately 40 MW of Demand Response Programs that will recruit residential, commercial and industrial customers within our service territory, beginning in 2026.
See “Part 1 – Item 1. Business – Future Electric Resource Needs” for further discussion of regional resource adequacy.
2026 Customer Load
We expect a decrease in customer load from 2025 to 2026 to have a negative impact on our 2026 results. This decrease in load is associated with a large industrial customer with their own transmission rights and access to procure their own energy independently. We were notified of this customer’s intent to return to procuring their power independently in the power markets effective April 2026, which is earlier than we had expected. Net income is expected to decrease $9 million compared to if we had served their load through December 2026.
In December 2025, the WUTC issued a final order for our filed tariff rider for Colstrip and on January 1, 2026, the transaction to transfer our 15 percent ownership in Colstrip Units 3 and 4 to NorthWestern closed. See “Colstrip” section and “Note 22 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for further details on the exit of Colstrip through an agreement with NorthWestern and "Regulatory Matters" for further details regarding the Colstrip final order.
Tariffs on Imports
The President of the United States of America has imposed tariffs on certain imported goods. The imposition of tariffs may impact the cost of other equipment and materials that are critical to our business, increasing capital and operating expenses, and could create supply chain disruptions. The tariffs have not had a material impact on our operations or financial performance to date. At this time, we do not expect the impact of tariffs to be material and have not made any adjustments to our capital or operating budget to account for increased costs resulting from tariffs.
We import a significant amount of natural gas from Canada, both to serve our retail natural gas customers and as fuel for electric generation. We do not expect these imports to be impacted by the current trade tariffs as they are covered by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, but the future of trade tariffs on energy commodity imports is uncertain. The impact of an increase in resource costs on our results of operations (directly or indirectly resulting from tariffs) would be substantially mitigated by various deferral and recovery mechanisms (ERM, PCA, and PGAs), but there could be an immediate impact on our cash flow.
In February 2026, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the legal basis cited by the President for the imposition of tariffs is not valid, and that he is restricted from imposing tariffs in the absence of a clear grant of authority from the Legislature. The impact of the Court’s ruling, both as to tariffs already collected and as to potential future tariffs, is uncertain at this time.
We are closely monitoring the impacts of tariffs and the potential impact they may have on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
U.S. Reconciliation Bill
In July 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBB) was signed into law, which includes significant changes to the U.S. tax code and related laws. Key provisions include modifications and extensions to certain provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 and updates to energy-related tax incentives, including revisions to the Clean Electricity Production Credit and the investment tax credit, as well as restrictions related to support from prohibited foreign entities. OBBB also allows for the current expensing of certain specified research and experimental (Section 174) expenditures.
The OBBB did not have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition in 2025. We continue to monitor ongoing guidance. Any future impacts will be recognized in the period in which they become known. See "Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" for further discussion of the impact of OBBB.
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Project
We are planning to implement an ERP system, replacing certain existing technology tools currently in use. The system will be designed to accurately maintain our financial records, enhance operational functionality, and provide timely information to our management team related to business operations. Accounting petitions were filed with the WUTC, the IPUC and the OPUC related to the project. These petitions include requesting to defer the undepreciated technology assets being replaced and a 15 year depreciable life for implementation costs. The requests were materially approved by the commissions.
We entered into a contract with a software provider and are in negotiations with system implementers. We expect the ERP system to be implemented in 2028. We expect capital expenditures between $100 million to $130 million.
Our hydroelectric generation is affected not only by precipitation levels, but also by temperatures since warmer weather causes earlier melting and runoff of snowpack, and extremely cold weather can result in the formation of ice which can decrease streamflow. During 2024, our region experienced low precipitation, resulting in low snowpack levels and streamflows when compared to historical averages. This had a negative impact on our hydroelectric generation resources. Lower hydroelectric generation increased net power supply costs and resulted in us absorbing additional costs under the ERM in Washington. In 2024, we had a $8 million pre-tax expense under the ERM in Washington.
Washington Climate Commitment Act
Effective January 1, 2023, the CCA went into effect in the State of Washington, requiring us to secure carbon allowances to cover our carbon emissions over a certain amount each year. Costs associated with the CCA are being deferred and are included in Washington natural gas customer rates starting in April 2024. The resulting aggregate increase to customer bills was 3.7 percent over a one year period, and impacts customers differently based on revenue class, income level, and meter connection date. An additional customer bill increase to recover costs associated with the CCA of 9.1 percent became effective in November 2024.
Costs associated with the CCA related to our electric operations are deferred and included in the ERM for Washington customers. Amounts allocated to Idaho are not approved for recovery from customers. Costs incurred for CCA compliance did not have a material effect on our results of operations for 2024 and 2023. See "Note 22 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" for further discussion of the CCA costs associated with our electric operations and impacts on our financial results.
Regulatory “lag” is inherent in utility ratemaking; a result of the delay between the investment in utility plant and/or the increase in costs and the receipt of an order of a public utility commission authorizing an increase in rates sufficient to recover such investment or costs. Regulatory lag can be mitigated to some extent by the incorporation of reasonably expected forward-looking information into an authorization of increased rates. However, there is no protection against unexpected inflation and increased interest rates, as experienced in 2022 and 2023.rates. See “Regulatory Matters” for additional discussion of the general rate cases.
Potential Tariffs on Imports
The President of the United States of America has announced plans to impose tariffs on certain imported goods. The implementation of these tariffs has been paused until March 2025. We anticipate that any such tariffs would apply to natural gas and electricity imported from Canada, as well as wood waste used as fuel at the Kettle Falls GS. As we import a significant amount of natural gas from Canada, both to serve our retail natural gas customers and as fuel for electric generation, these tariffs could have a significant impact on our resource costs. In addition, we cannot predict how the broader energy markets would respond and change as a result of the tariffs. The impact of an increase in resource costs on our results of operations from the tariffs would be partially mitigated by various deferral and recovery mechanisms (ERM, PCA, and PGAs), but there could be an immediate impact on our cash flow. These tariffs could also impact the cost of other equipment and materials that are critical to our business, and could increase capital and operating expenses.
2022 General Rate Cases
In December 2022, the WUTC issued an order approving the multi-party settlement agreement filed in June 2022. The approved rates were designed to increase annual base electric revenues by $38 million, or 6.9 percent, effective in December 2022, and $13 million, or 2.1 percent, effective in December 2023. The approved rates were also designed to increase annual base natural gas revenues by $8 million, or 6.5 percent, effective in December 2022, and $2 million, or 1.2 percent, effective in December 2023.
To mitigate the overall impact of the revenue increases on customers, part of the 2022 base rate increase was offset with tax customer credits. The total estimated benefits of these credits, $28 million for electric customers and $13 million for natural gas customers, were returned over a two-year period from December 2022 to December 2024.
In addition, the order approved a separate tracking mechanism and tariff for purposes of recovering existing and prospective Colstrip costs through December 31, 2025. See "Colstrip Tracker" below.
The WUTC approved an ROR of 7.03 percent, but the settlement does not specify an explicit ROE, cost of debt or capital structure.
The approved rates within the orders arewere designed to increase annual electric base revenues by $12 million (or 2.0 percent), effective January 1, 2025 (Rate Year 1), and $44 million (or 7.5 percent) for Rate Year 2. The difference in approved rates for Rate Year 1 and those included in our original request of a $77 million increase is primarily due to a $56 million decrease in power supply costs compared to those set forth in the original request, and also due to a lower approved return on equity than what was requested. The Rate Year 2 increase represents the effective increase to customers resulting from the $69 million approved in the order, partially offset by a $25 million decrease due to the expiration of a separate tariff in effect during Rate Year 1 to collect remaining Colstrip expenses by December 31, 2025 (see further discussion below).
The approved rates arewere also designed to increase annual natural gas base revenues by $14 million (or 11.2 percent), effective January 1, 2025, and $4 million (or 2.8 percent) for Rate Year 2.
The WUTC did not approve our request to modify the ERM under which differences between actual net power supply costs and the amount reflected in base retail customer rates are tracked. BasedOur onactual ournet forecastpower energy commoditysupply costs exceeded the amount reflected in 2025base retail customer rates by $78 million in 2025, and 2026, we expect actual net power supply costs to significantly exceed the level included in base rates.rates in 2026. We plan to continue to address how net power supply costs are set in base rates in future regulatory proceedings. See Note 23 for further details of the ERM and other power cost deferrals and recovery mechanisms.
2026 General Rate Cases
On January 16, 2026, we filed an MYRP with the WUTC. The MYRP requests base rate relief over four years designed to produce the additional base revenues shown below (dollars in millions):
We requested an overall rate of return in 2027 of 7.5 percent, with a 48.5 common equity ratio and a 10.2 percent return on equity. We requested an increase to the overall rate of return in 2029 to 7.67 percent, with a 48.5 common equity ratio and 10.5 percent return on equity.
Key drivers of the revenue requirement in rate year one (2027) are outlined below (dollars in millions):
In the MYRP, we propose certain changes to the calculation of authorized baseline power supply costs. These changes are designed to address the changing market dynamics which have led to significant volatility in actual power supply costs. The MYRP provides updates to our baseline power supply cost for rate years one and two; as required by Washington law, baseline power supply costs for rate years 3 and 4 will be established in later filings and as such are not included in the additional revenue requirements for those years shown above. In addition, we are proposing changes to the timing for recovery of costs deferred under the Energy Recovery Mechanism.
In addition to requesting re-approval of existing insurance, wildfire, and decoupling deferral accounts, we are proposing an additional deferral mechanism for costs associated with employee benefits.
Washington law requires utilities to file MYRPs of a minimum of two and up to four years. The law allows utilities filing a rate plan of 3 or 4 years the option to file a new rate plan for the third year and fourth year. Under this provision, we have the opportunity to address the numerous unpredictable factors that could materially affect our financial position over a longer-term rate plan. These risks include, but are not limited to, inflation, interest rate volatility, labor and benefits challenges, escalating capital costs, and other unforeseen cost drivers. See "Item 1A: Risk Factors" for a full discussion of these factors.
The WUTC has up to eleven months to review the general rate case filings and issue a decision.
In 2019, the Washington State Legislature passed the CETA, which, among other things, requires costs associated with coal-fired generation facilities to be removed from rates no later than December 31, 2025. The WUTC order approving the settlement of the 2022 general rate cases, discussed above, required us to establish a tracker for our Colstrip-related costs, including operating and maintenance expense, depreciation and amortization expense, and a return on rate base. In October 2024, we filed a cost recovery tariff seeking to recover the costs associated with our ownership of Colstrip in 2025. In the filing, we requested an increase in annual Colstrip tariff revenues of $19 million – from $24 million in 2024 to $43 million in 2025, effective January 1, 2025. In its review, WUTC Staff raised three concerns related to (1) whether forecasted 2025 investments are allowed in rates; (2) whether the capital investment included in the filing will be used and useful for customers prior to the end of 2025; and (3) one major capital investment that will not be in service until 2027. In December 2024, the WUTC allowed our filed tariff to go into effect, but set the rates as subject to refund. TheA WUTCfinal setorder thewas matter for adjudicationissued in December 2025, butwhich alsodetermined orderedthat us,certain WUTCinvestments Staff,in Colstrip were not used or useful to our customers after December 31, 2025, and otheras interestedsuch partiesshould be prorated or disallowed. As a result, we are required to meetissue anda resolve the issues. A status report is duerefund to thecustomers WUTCof $9 million, either in a lump sum or spread over up to three months. We are required to file a compliance filing by March 31, 2025.2026 Ifdetailing the parties2025 cannotColstrip resolve the concerns of WUTC Staff, we believe a procedural schedule will be developedinvestments and acustomer hearing date set.refunds.
2025 General Rate CaseCases
In August 2025, the IPUC approved the all-party settlement agreement designed to increase annual base electric revenues by $20 million, or 6.3 percent, effective September 2025, and $15 million, or 4.5 percent, effective September 2026. For natural gas, the agreement was designed to increase annual base natural gas revenues by $5 million, or 9.2 percent, effective September 2025, and decrease annual base natural gas revenues by $0.2 million, or 0.4 percent, effective September 2026.
The settlement was based on an ROE of 9.6 percent with a common equity ratio of 50 percent and an ROR of 7.28 percent.
In January 2025, we filed multiyear electric and natural gas general rate cases with the IPUC. If approved, new rates would be effective in September 2025 and September 2026. The proposed rates are designed to increase annual base electric revenues by $43 million, or 14.0 percent, effective in September 2025, and $18 million, or 5.0 percent, effective in September 2026. For natural gas, the proposed rates are designed to increase annual base natural gas revenues by $9 million, or 17.7 percent, effective September 2025, and $1 million, or 1.7 percent, effective September 2026. The proposed electric and natural gas revenue increase requests are based on an ROR of 7.68 percent, with a common equity ratio of 50 percent and an ROE of 10.4 percent. Ongoing capital infrastructure investment (including replacement of wood poles and natural gas distribution pipe, continued investment in the wildfire resiliency plan, and technology) and increases in operations, maintenance, and power supply costs are the main drivers of the proposed increases. The IPUC has up to nine months to review the general rate case filings and issue a decision.
2023 General Rate Case
In October 2023, the OPUC approved the all-party settlement agreement filed in August 2023. The approved rates are designed to increase annual base natural gas revenues by $7 million, or 9.4 percent. The OPUC approved an ROR of 7.24 percent, a common equity ratio of 50 percent, and an ROE of 9.5 percent. New rates were effective on January 1, 2024.
In May 2025, the OPUC approved the all-party settlement agreement designed to increase annual base revenues by $4 million, or 5.0 percent, effective in September 2025. The settlement was based on an ROE of 9.5 percent with a common equity ratio of 50 percent and an ROR of 7.22 percent.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
Refer to the 2025 Form 10-K for disclosure of risk factors that could have a significant impact on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows and could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those discussed in our reports filed with the SEC (including this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q), and elsewhere. These risk factors have not materially changed from the disclosures provided in the 2025 Form 10-K.
No wording changes found in this section.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “2026 Wildfire Conditions”
New heading “Potential Large Load Growth”
New heading “2027 General Rate Cases”
New heading “Alaska Electric Light and Power Company”
New heading “Alaska General Rate Case”
New heading “Six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025”
New heading “Intercompany Revenues and Resource Costs”
New heading “Utility Resource Costs”
New heading “Six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025”
New heading “Utility Operating Revenues”
New heading “Capital Structure”
Removed heading “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”
Largest changes
“Six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025”see in full comparison
“Six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025”see in full comparison
“Net cash provided by operating activities was $179 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $184 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. There was a decrease of $31 million associated with net decoupling deferrals and amortizations, primarily associated with decoupling surcharges recognized in the first quarter of 2026 due to milder weather and decreased customer usage. …”see in full comparison
“A number of wildfires have occurred within our service territory in 2026, impacting our operations. While the causes of some fires remain under investigation, virtually all have been attributed to human activity or lightning. Two fires ignited near our facilities but have since been fully contained. One fire damaged a small storage facility. No structures were impacted by the other fire. We do not believe either of these ignitions resulted from the improper operation or maintenance of our facilities. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (161)
Our business segments have not changed during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026. See the 2025 Form 10-K as well as “Note 1416 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” for further information regarding our business segments.
The following table presents net income (loss) for each of our business segments and the other businesses for the three and six months ended MarchJune 3130 (dollars in millions):
Net income for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 increased compared to the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, primarily due to increased utility margin resulting from the effects of our general rate cases and net investment gains at our other businessesbusinesses, compared to net investment losses in the firstrespective periods of 2025. See “Note 5 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information regarding the gain recorded in the second quarter of 2025.2026, as well as expected gains and losses during the remainder of 2026.
The effects of our general rate cases also increased net income in 2026.
When comparing results from the first quarterhalf of 2026 to the first quarterhalf of 2025, the transfer of our ownership of Colstrip (effective January 1, 2026) has resulted in fluctuations in multiple line items on the income statement, which ultimately net to an immaterial impact on earnings.net income. The removal of Colstrip from our generation portfolio resulted in an increase in authorized power supply cost and increases in both electric utility revenues and electric resource costs (resulting in no impact on electricnet utility marginincome). In addition, other operating costs and depreciation expense have decreased, with a corresponding decrease in electric utility revenues associated with recovery of these costs.
2026 Wildfire Conditions
A number of wildfires have occurred within our service territory in 2026, impacting our operations. While the causes of some fires remain under investigation, virtually all have been attributed to human activity or lightning. Two fires ignited near our facilities but have since been fully contained. One fire damaged a small storage facility. No structures were impacted by the other fire. We do not believe either of these ignitions resulted from the improper operation or maintenance of our facilities. In response to an increased wildfire risk driven primarily by high winds and drier-than-normal conditions, we have proactively implemented enhanced system protections and public safety power shutoffs. We continue to monitor conditions closely and respond as needed to mitigate this elevated risk.
Current Hydroelectric Conditions and Outlook
Due to precipitation and warm weather, ourOur hydroelectric generation year-to-date has been above normal. Due to the warm weather, the average current level of snowpack in the areas serving our hydroelectric facilities is below normal. The amount of hydroelectric generation over the rest of the year will beis affected not only by current snowpack levels but also by prevailing temperatures (which affect the timing and speed of run-off) and the volume, timing and form of precipitation. On balance, we expect hydroelectric generation for the entire year will be approximately above the normal level.normal. While our current hydrohydroelectric forecast shows above normal levels of generation,generation evenfor ifthe wefull wereyear, whether actual results are above or below normal, there would be no material change to our net income, based upon our forecast surcharge position in the 90 percent customer, 10 percent company sharing band of the ERM.
Potential Large Load Growth
In May 2026, we entered into a non-binding memorandum of understanding (MOU) with a data center developer seeking interconnection and energy supply in our Washington service territory. The developer is seeking an initial load demand of 125 MW starting in 2029, with a pathway to expand to 500 MW by 2032.
In June 2026, we announced that we will take additional time to evaluate the processing of energy requests from data center developers, and have paused negotiations associated with the MOU. This decision followed community interest and concern surrounding the MOU. We are seeking to partner with governmental agencies on creating a clear and coordinated planning process as we consider additional stakeholder feedback associated with large load requests.
The approved rates within the orders are designed to increase annual electric base revenues by $12 million (or 2.0 percent), effective January 1, 2025 (Rate Year 1), and $69 million (or 11.4 percent), foreffective January 1, 2026 (Rate Year 2.2). The Rate Year 2 increase includes $54 million related to higher authorized power supply costs resulting from the removal of Colstrip from our generation portfolio. This base increase is offset by decreases in capital and operating costs removed from customer rates of $43 million, effective January 1, 2026, as we are no longer recovering Colstrip related costs.
The approved rates are also designed to increase annual natural gas base revenues by $14 million (or 11.2 percent), effective January 1, 2025, and $4 million (or 2.8 percent), foreffective RateJanuary Year1, 2.2026.
The WUTC did not approve of our request to modify the ERM under which differences between actual net power supply costs and the amount reflected in base retail customer rates are tracked. Based on our forecast energy commodity costs in 2025 and 2026, we expect actual net power supply costs to exceed the level included in base rates. We plan to continue to address how net power supply costs are set in base rates in future regulatory proceedings.
The CommissionWUTC continued its support for important recovery mechanisms such as wildfire and insurance balancing accounts, and decoupling.
Washington law requires utilities to file MYRPs of a minimum of two and up to four years. The law allows utilities filing a rate plan of 3three or 4four years the option to file a new rate plan for the third year and fourth year. Under this provision, we have the opportunity to address the numerous unpredictable factors that could materially affect our financial position over a longer-term rate plan. These risks include, but are not limited to, inflation, interest rate volatility, labor and benefits challenges, escalating capital costs, and other unforeseen cost drivers.
The WUTC has up to eleven months to review the general rate case filings and issue a decision. The initialevidentiary settlement conferencehearing is expected to take place in May 2026, with evidentiary hearings scheduled for September 2026.
2027 General Rate Cases
We expect to file electric and natural gas general rate cases with the IPUC in the first quarter of 2027.
In 2025, we received approval from the WUTC to recover $32 million of the ERM deferred surcharge balance in Washington over a two-year period starting July 1, 2025. In 2026, we received approval from the WUTC to recover an additional $65 million of the ERM deferred surcharge balance in Washington over a two-year period starting July 1, 2026.
Alaska Electric Light and Power Company
Alaska General Rate Case
In May 2026, AEL&P filed an electric general rate case with the Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA). AEL&P's request for an interim base rate increase of 12.5 percent (designed to increase electric revenues by $5 million), was approved and took effect in June 2026. AEL&P is seeking a permanent base rate increase of an additional 12.6 percent (designed to increase electric revenues by $5 million), which, if approved, could take effect in August 2027. This represents a combined total rate increase of 25.1 percent (designed to increase electric revenues by $10.0 million). The proposed revenue increase request is based on a 13.2 percent ROE with a common equity ratio of 58.33 percent and a ROR of 9.75 percent.
The RCA must rule on permanent rate increases within 450 days (approximately 15 months) from the date of filing.
During the first quarter of 2026, we filed a request with the WUTC to recover from customers $65 million of ERM costs deferred in 2025 over a one-year period starting July 1, 2026.
Three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025
The following graph shows the total change in net income for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to the firstsecond quarter of 2025, as well as the factors that caused such change (dollars in millions):
Electric Utility revenues increased due to increases in retail rates associated with our general rate case, which were partially offset by removing the recovery of Colstrip related costs. This increase to revenues was largely offset by decreased wholesale revenues and decreases in volumes sold. The decrease in volumes sold is due to the departure of a large industrial customer in April 2026. Natural gas revenues increased due to rate increases, largely offset by decreases in wholesale revenues and decoupling revenues.
Electric utility revenues decreased primarily as a result of decreased wholesale revenues associated with lower market prices, and a reduction of revenues associated with the recovery of Colstrip costs, which were partially offset by other increases in retail rates associated with our general rate cases. Natural gas revenues decreased due to decreased rates associated with the PGAs and the CCA (which do not impact utility margin or net income), as well as decreased wholesale revenues, transportation revenues and an increased provision for rate refunds associated with overearnings in Washington.
Electric utility resource costs decreased primarily due to decreased purchased power costs associated with decreased wholesale prices, as well as decreased fuel for generation costs partially due to the removal of Colstrip from our generation portfolio. TheseThis decreases werewas partially offset by aincreased decreasepurchased inpower deferralsvolumes and wholesale prices, as well as increased costs under the ERM. Natural gas utility resource costs decreased due to decreases in the amortization of costs associated with the CCA and net deferrals and amortizations of costs under PGAs, as well as a decrease in volumes of natural gas purchased.
Other utility operating expenses increased due primarily to increased employee salaries and benefit costs, partially offset with decreases from removing Colstrip related expenses.
Other operating expenses remained unchanged, with decreased expenses from Colstrip offset by expected increases in other expenses.
Utility depreciation and amortization decreased primarily due to our exit from Colstrip in 2026. In anticipation of the exit, we had accelerated depreciation, as we were required to recover costs from Washington customers by the end of 2025.
Income tax expense increased primarily due to increased pre-tax income from continuing operations (including equity method earnings) compared to the prior year.
Increased equity method earnings were primarily the result of underlying investment appreciation recognized in the second quarter of 2026, compared to losses recognized in the second quarter of 2025. See “Note 5 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information regarding the gain recorded in the second quarter of 2026.
Six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025
The following graph shows the total change in net income for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025, as well as the factors that caused such change (dollars in millions):
Electric utility revenues decreased primarily as a result of decreased wholesale revenues associated with lower market prices, a reduction of revenues associated with the recovery of Colstrip costs, and the departure of a large industrial customer in April 2026, which were partially offset by other increases in retail rates associated with our general rate cases. Natural gas revenues decreased due to decreased rates associated with the PGAs and the CCA (which do not impact net income), as well as decreased wholesale revenues, transportation revenues and an increased provision for rate refunds associated with overearnings in Washington.
Electric utility resource costs decreased primarily due to decreased fuel for generation costs partially due to the removal of Colstrip from our generation portfolio. These decreases were partially offset by a decrease in deferrals under the ERM. Natural gas utility resource costs decreased due to decreases in the amortization of costs associated with the CCA and net deferrals and amortizations of costs under PGAs, as well as a decrease in volumes of natural gas purchased.
Other utility operating expenses increased due primarily to increased employee salaries and benefit costs, partially offset with decreases from removing Colstrip related expenses.
Utility depreciation and amortization decreased primarily due to our transfer of Colstrip.
Income tax expense increased primarily due to increased pre-tax income from continuing operations (including equity method earnings) compared to the prior year.
Increased equity method earnings were primarily the result of underlying investment appreciation recognized in the first half of 2026, compared to losses recognized in the first half of 2025. See “Note 5 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information regarding the gain recorded in the second quarter of 2026.
Increases in earnings from other activity are primarily due to net investment gains, compared to net investment losses in the first quarter of 2025.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The following discussion for Avista Utilities includes two financial measures considered “non-GAAP financial measures”: electric utility margin and natural gas utility margin.
Generally, a non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of a company's financial performance, financial position or cash flows that excludes (or includes) amounts included (excluded) in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. Electric utility margin is electric operating revenues less electric resource costs, while natural gas utility margin is natural gas operating revenues less natural gas resource costs. The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to electric and natural gas utility margin is utility operating revenues as presented in "Note 14 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements."
The presentation of electric utility margin and natural gas utility margin is intended to enhance the understanding of operating performance. We use these measures internally and believe they provide useful information to investors in their analysis of how changes in loads (due to weather, economic or other conditions), rates, supply costs and other factors impact our results of operations. Changes in loads, as well as power and natural gas supply costs, are generally deferred and recovered from customers through regulatory accounting mechanisms. Accordingly, the analysis of utility margin generally excludes most of the change in revenue resulting from these regulatory mechanisms. We present electric and natural gas utility margin separately below for Avista Utilities since each business has different cost sources, cost recovery mechanisms and jurisdictions, so we believe separate analysis is beneficial. These measures are not intended to replace utility operating revenues as determined in accordance with GAAP as an indicator of operating performance. Reconciliations of operating revenues to utility margin are set forth below.
Intercompany Revenues and Resource Costs
Intracompany revenues and resource costs represent purchases and sales of natural gas between our natural gas distribution operations and our electric generation operations (as fuel for our generation plants). These transactions are eliminated in the presentation of total results for Avista Utilities and in the condensed consolidated financial statements but are included in the separate results for electric and natural gas presented below.
Three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025
The following graphs present Avista Utilities' electric operating revenues and megawatt-hour (MWh) sales for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (dollars in millions and MWhs in thousands):
This balance includes public street and highway lighting, which is considered part of retail electric revenues.
Total electric operating revenues in the graph above include intracompany sales of $1 million for both the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025.
The following table presents the current year decoupling deferrals and the amortization of prior year decoupling deferrals reflected in utility electric operating revenues for the three months ended June 30 (dollars in millions):
Positive amounts are increases in decoupling revenue in the current year and will be surcharged to customers in future years. Negative amounts are decreases in decoupling revenue in the current year and will be rebated to customers in future years.
Positive amounts are increases in decoupling revenue in the current year and are related to the amortization of rebate balances that resulted in prior years and are being refunded to customers (causing a corresponding decrease in retail revenue from customers) in the current year. Negative amounts are decreases in decoupling revenue in the current year and are related to the amortization of surcharge balances that resulted in prior years and are being surcharged to customers (causing a corresponding increase in retail revenue from customers) in the current year.
Total electric revenues did not change materially for the second quarter of 2026 as compared to the second quarter of 2025. The primary fluctuations that occurred during the period were as follows:
A $5 million increase in retail electric revenue due to an increase in retail rates (increased revenues by $25 million) offset by a decrease in MWhs sold (decreased revenues by $20 million).
AVA insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 2 filings (2 insiders, 2 trade dates, 6,268 shares, about $239.4K). Net open-market shares: -6,268 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$239.4K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-02 | Diluciano Joshua D |
Open-market sale | 818 | $37.25 | $30.5K |
| 2026-09-02 | Diluciano Joshua D |
Open-market sale | 3,857 | $37.24 | $143.6K |
| 2026-09-01 | Widmann Janet D. |
Grant/award | 44 | $37.16 | $1.6K |
| 2026-09-01 | Stanley Heidi B |
Grant/award | 44 | $37.16 | $1.6K |
| 2026-09-01 | Philipps Jeffry L. |
Grant/award | 44 | $37.16 | $1.6K |
| 2026-09-01 | Morris Scott L |
Grant/award | 44 | $37.16 | $1.6K |
| 2026-09-01 | Maw Scott Harlan |
Grant/award | 44 | $37.16 | $1.6K |
| 2026-09-01 | Kwawu Sena M |
Grant/award | 44 | $37.16 | $1.6K |
| 2026-09-01 | Klein Rebecca A |
Grant/award | 44 | $37.16 | $1.6K |
| 2026-09-01 | Jacobsen Kevin B |
Grant/award | 44 | $37.16 | $1.6K |
| 2026-09-01 | Burke Donald C |
Grant/award | 44 | $37.16 | $1.6K |
| 2026-09-01 | Bentz Julie A. |
Grant/award | 44 | $37.16 | $1.6K |
| 2026-06-15 | Meyer David J |
Other | 45 | $40.98 | $1.8K |
| 2026-05-15 | Meyer David J |
Other | 45 | $40.41 | $1.8K |
| 2026-05-14 | Thackston Jason R |
Gift | 3,210 | $41.16 | $132.1K |
| 2026-05-08 | Widmann Janet D. |
Grant/award | 3,538 | $40.98 | $145.0K |
| 2026-05-08 | Stanley Heidi B |
Grant/award | 3,538 | $40.98 | $145.0K |
| 2026-05-08 | Philipps Jeffry L. |
Grant/award | 3,538 | $40.98 | $145.0K |
| 2026-05-08 | Morris Scott L |
Grant/award | 3,538 | $40.98 | $145.0K |
| 2026-05-08 | Maw Scott Harlan |
Grant/award | 3,538 | $40.98 | $145.0K |
| 2026-05-08 | Kwawu Sena M |
Grant/award | 3,538 | $40.98 | $145.0K |
| 2026-05-08 | Klein Rebecca A |
Grant/award | 3,538 | $40.98 | $145.0K |
| 2026-05-08 | Jacobsen Kevin B |
Grant/award | 3,538 | $40.98 | $145.0K |
| 2026-05-08 | Burke Donald C |
Grant/award | 3,538 | $40.98 | $145.0K |
| 2026-05-08 | Bentz Julie A. |
Grant/award | 3,538 | $40.98 | $145.0K |
| 2026-05-07 | Manuel Wayne O |
Open-market sale | 1,593 | $40.98 | $65.3K |
| 2026-04-15 | Meyer David J |
Other | 46 | $41.41 | $1.9K |
Well-known investors holding AVA (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 1,242,432 | $50.8M | 0.04% | Added 22% |
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 702,491 | $28.7M | 0.01% | Added 100% |
| D. E. Shaw & Co. | 2026-06-30 | 516,882 | $21.1M | 0.01% | Reduced 15% |
| Bridgewater Associates | 2026-06-30 | 471,986 | $19.3M | 0.08% | Added 2509% |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 266,700 | $10.9M | 0.02% | Added 80% |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 165,625 | $6.8M | 0.0% | Added 46% |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 82,508 | $3.4M | 0.01% | Reduced 61% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 15,057 | $616.0K | 0.0% | Reduced 91% |