AVPT 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
AvePoint, Inc. · Nasdaq · Services-Prepackaged Software · CIK 1777921 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Risks Related to our Common Stock”
Largest changes
“In recent months, markets, businesses, and consumers have reacted adversely to volatility and uncertainty in international trade policies. Among other things, significant and new tariffs, sanctions, and trade barriers have been imposed and modified, impacting a broad range of raw materials, goods and international trade. Although our current business model is not directly reliant on the import or export of physical goods, tariffs or other trade policies may indirectly adversely impact our business. …”see in full comparison
“Strategic technology partners and third parties may not be successful in building integrations, co-marketing our products and services to provide significant volume and quality of lead referrals or continue to work with us as their respective products evolve. Identifying, negotiating and documenting relationships with additional strategic technology partners require significant resources. Integrating third-party technology can be complex, costly and time-consuming. Third parties may be unwilling to build integrations. …”see in full comparison
“Our common stock is currently traded on Nasdaq and the Main Board of Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited (the “SGX-ST”). Subject to compliance with U.S. securities laws and procedures of The Central Depository (Pte) Limited (“CDP”) holders of our common stock may use CDP’s procedures for cross border securities transfers via The Depository Trust Company to transfer common stock traded on the SGX-ST to Nasdaq. Any holder of common stock traded on Nasdaq may also transfer such interests for trading on the SGX-ST. …”see in full comparison
“We have a strategic technology partnership with Microsoft for the collaboration to co-sell and co-market our products and services to new customers. If our relationships with our strategic technology partners, such as Microsoft, are disrupted or if the co-sell and co-market program was ended for any reason, we may receive less revenue and incur costs to form other revenue-generating strategic technology partnerships.”see in full comparison
“There is no direct trading or settlement between Nasdaq and the SGX-ST. CDP both acts as central depositary for the SGX-ST and is a DTC participant and facilitates settlement between the two markets via its procedures for cross border securities transfers via DTC. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (21)
The significant majority of our customers choose to integrate their products and services with, or as an enhancement of, third-party solutionssolutions, suchand as infrastructure, platforms or applications, in particular from Microsoft. Thethe functionality and popularity of our products and services depend largely on our ability to integrate our platform with third-party solutions,solutions. in particular Microsoft’s Azure, SharePoint, and Office 365. We are dependent on technology partner solutions for several major categoriesMany of our offerings,products includingwork datainteractively management,with migration,partner governance,solutions, protectionand, and backup. Asas a result, our customers’customers' satisfaction with our products areis, highlyto dependentsome extent, contingent on their perception of, and satisfaction with, our third-party providers and their respective offerings. We will continue to depend on various third-party relationships to sustain and grow our business. Third-party providers may change the features of their solutions, alter their governing terms, or end the solutions’ availability altogether. They may restrict our ability to add, customize or integrate systems, functionality and customer experiences.solutions. Any such changes could limit or terminate our ability to use these third-party solutions and provide our customers with the full range of our products and services.services, Ourand our business wouldcould be negatively impacted if we fail to retain these relationships for any reason, including due to third parties’ failure to support or secure their technology or integrations; errors, bugs, or defects in their technology; or changes in our products and services.relationships. Any such failure, as well as a prolonged disruption, a cybersecurity event or any other negative event affecting our third-party providers and leading to customer dissatisfaction, could harm our relationship with our customers, our reputation and brand, our revenue, our business, and our results of operations.
Strategic technology partners and third parties may not be successful in building integrations, co-marketing our products and services to provide significant volume and quality of lead referrals or continue to work with us as their respective products evolve. Identifying, negotiating and documenting relationships with additional strategic technology partners require significant resources. Integrating third-party technology can be complex, costly and time-consuming. Third parties may be unwilling to build integrations. We may be required to devote additional resources to develop integrations for our own products. Strategic technology partners or providers of solutions with which we have integrations may decide to compete with us or enter into arrangements with our competitors, resulting in such partners or providers withdrawing support for our integrations. Our agreements with our partners are generally non-exclusive, meaning our partners may offer products from several different companies to their customers. Specifically, Microsoft and other major platform providers could end partnerships, cease marketing our offerings, with limited or no notice and with little or no penalty, or decide to purchase strong competition, or incorporate our capabilities into native solutions. Any of these developments would negatively impact our business.
Microsoft and other cloud platform providers may furthermore introduce functionality that competes with our products and services, as a result of an acquisition, or their own development. Additionally, we rely heavily on our early access to preview Microsoft technology, which enables our product strategy and development teams to anticipate future opportunities as well as validate our current direction. In situations where Microsoft introduces competitive features to our products, including a Microsoft premium option, some customers will choose a simpler first-party solution to their problem, even at a greater cost to them. Microsoft and other cloud providers may also choose to make it difficult for third party providers like us to continue making the necessary application programming interface (“API”) calls to provide their solutions, as illustrated by an increase in API “throttling” in recent years or API quotas provided by Salesforce.
Although we typically receive significant advance notice of new product releases from Microsoft, Microsoft does not always preview their technology with us or other partners and, as a result, it is possible that we may not receive advance notice of changes in features and functionality of new technologies with which our products will need to interoperate. If this was to happen, there could be an increased risk of product incompatibility. Any failure of our products and services to operate effectively with solutions could result in customer dissatisfaction and harm to our business, and could reduce the demand for our products and services. If we are unable to respond to these changes or failures in a cost-effective manner, our products and services may become less marketable, less competitive, or obsolete, and the results of our operations may be negatively impacted.
We have a strategic technology partnership with Microsoft for the collaboration to co-sell and co-market our products and services to new customers. If our relationships with our strategic technology partners, such as Microsoft, are disrupted or if the co-sell and co-market program was ended for any reason, we may receive less revenue and incur costs to form other revenue-generating strategic technology partnerships.
We deliver the AvePoint Confidence Platform and our related cloud services through cloud-hosted infrastructure operated by third-party hyperscaler cloud providers. Our platform services are deployed across multiple geographically distributed data centers and regions, and may be hosted in environments operated by GCP, Azure, and AWS to support customer requirements for performance, resilience, and data residency. We deploy our services across multiple data centers within key geographies and maintain additional regional capacity to support disaster recovery and business continuity.
We currently serve the majority of our SaaS offerings from third-party data center hosting facilities in different geographical locations that are operated by Microsoft. Our products and services, in particular SaaS offerings, are deployed to multiple data centers within these geographies, with additional geographies available for disaster recovery. Our operations depend,depend in part,part on ourthese third-party providers’cloud providers to maintain the availability, security, and physical protection of thesetheir facilities and underlying networks from natural disasters, power or telecommunications failures, criminal acts, orcyber similarincidents, and other disruptive events. If any third-party facility’sfacility's arrangement is terminated, or our service lapses, we could experience interruptions in our platform,platform latency, as well as delays and additional expenses in arranging new facilities and services.
A significant portion of our operating costs are from our third-party data hosting and transmission services. If the costs for such services increase due to vendor consolidation, regulation, contract renegotiation or otherwise, we may not be able to increase the fees for our products and services to cover the changes.cost increases. As a result, our operating results may be significantly worse than forecasted. Our failure to achieve or maintain sufficient and performant data transmission capacity could significantly reduce demand for our products and services.
In recent months, markets, businesses, and consumers have reacted adversely to volatility and uncertainty in international trade policies. Among other things, significant and new tariffs, sanctions, and trade barriers have been imposed and modified, impacting a broad range of raw materials, goods and international trade. Although our current business model is not directly reliant on the import or export of physical goods, tariffs or other trade policies may indirectly adversely impact our business. For example, any future tariffs on software as a service could make our products more expensive, decrease our profitability or lessen demand for our products. Additionally, any of our customers affected by current or future tariffs may find themselves in an expense-reducing environment and not renew or reduce a contract with us upon renewal.
While we continue to monitor trade developments, the ultimate impact of these risks remains uncertain and any prolonged economic downturn, escalation in trade tensions, or deterioration in international perception of U.S.-based companies could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
Risks Related to our Common Stock
Our common stock is currently traded on Nasdaq and the Main Board of Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited (the “SGX-ST”). Subject to compliance with U.S. securities laws and procedures of The Central Depository (Pte) Limited (“CDP”) holders of our common stock may use CDP’s procedures for cross border securities transfers via The Depository Trust Company to transfer common stock traded on the SGX-ST to Nasdaq. Any holder of common stock traded on Nasdaq may also transfer such interests for trading on the SGX-ST. In the event that a substantial number of shares of common stock are exchanged between these markets, the liquidity and trading price of our common stock on the SGX-ST and common stock on Nasdaq may be adversely affected. Additionally, trading in our common stock on these markets will be made in different currencies and take place at different times (resulting from different time zones, different trading days and different public holidays in the United States and Singapore). The trading prices of our common stock on these two markets may differ due to these and other factors. Any decrease in the price of our common stock on one of these markets could cause a decrease in the trading price of our common stock on the other market. On the other hand, investors could also seek to sell or buy our common stock to take advantage of any price differences between the markets through a practice referred to as arbitrage. Any arbitrage activity could create unexpected volatility in the trading price of our common stock.
There is no direct trading or settlement between Nasdaq and the SGX-ST. CDP both acts as central depositary for the SGX-ST and is a DTC participant and facilitates settlement between the two markets via its procedures for cross border securities transfers via DTC. In addition, the time differences between Singapore and New York, unforeseen market circumstances, temporary closure of the facilities offered by CDP for cross border securities transfers via DTC, the procedures of a stockholder’s brokers in Singapore and/or the United States, or other factors may delay the transfer of common stock from trading on the SGX-ST to Nasdaq (and vice versa). Investors will be prevented from settling or effecting the sale of their securities during such periods of delay. In addition, there is no assurance that any transfer of common stock from trading on the SGX-ST to Nasdaq (and vice versa) will be completed in accordance with the timelines that stockholders may anticipate. Furthermore, CDP and other DTC participants are entitled to charge holders fees for cross border securities transfers via DTC. Brokers in Singapore and/or the United States may charge additional fees. As a result, stockholders who transfer common stock from the SGX-ST to Nasdaq (and vice versa) may not achieve the anticipated level of economic return.
Our operations may, in some cases, involve the storage, transmissiontransmission, and other processing of customer data or information. Cyberattacks and other malicious internet-based activity continue to increase, and cloud-based platform providers of services are expected to continue to be targeted. Threats include traditional computer “hackers,” malicious code (such as viruses and worms), phishing attacks, employee theft or misuse and denial-of-service attacks. Sophisticated nation-states and nation-state supported actors now engage in such attacks, including advanced persistent threat intrusions. The growth in state sponsored cyber activity showcases the increasing sophistication of cyber threats and could dramatically expand the global threat landscape. While no single company can thwart a nation state attack, we work to implement and continuously improve security-aware software development, operational management, and threat-mitigation practices that are essential to the strong protection of services and data. AvePoint has experience spanning multiple decades of building enterprise software and running online services around the world. We implement a robust defense-in-depth security strategy based on the principle of “assume breach.” We work to continuously strengthen threat detection, response, and defense, conduct continuous security monitoring, and practice security incident response to validate and improve the security of our software and services. Rigorous third-party audits verify that we adhere to strict security controls such as the ones contained in the ISO/IEC 27001 standard mandate. We are audited once a year for ISO/IEC 27001, 27017 and 27701 compliance by a third-party accredited certification body, which provides independent validation that security controls are in place and operating effectively.
We have security measures in place designed to protect us and our customers’ confidential and sensitive information and prevent data loss, but such measures cannot provide absolute security and may not be effective to prevent a security breach, including as a result of employee error, theft, misuse or malfeasance, third-party actions, unintentional events or deliberate attacks by cyber criminals, any of which may result in someone obtaining unauthorized access to our customers’ data, our data, our intellectual property and/or other confidential or sensitive business information. Importantly, the scope of our internal information controls and security measures is limited to the scope of our information security management system (“ ISMS”). All of the legal entities (and each of their respective employees) within our global corporate structure are contractually bound to the ISMS, but failure by any of our subsidiaries or affiliates (or employees thereof) to abide by the terms and conditions imposed by our ISMS could result in increased vulnerabilities, decreased integrity of our assets, and ultimately, liability, loss of business, and loss of customer confidence.
The ISMS applies to the use of information, network resources, and electronic and computing devices to conduct business or interact with internal networks and business systems, whether owned or leased by us, our employees, or a third party. All employees, contractors, consultants, as well as our affiliates and subsidiaries are responsible for exercising good judgment regarding appropriate use of information, electronic devices, and network resources in accordance with the ISMS, as well as local laws and regulation. While we have policies and procedures to address global compliance with the ISMS, our employees and agents could violate these policies and applicable law, for which we may be ultimately held responsible. We are taking further steps to assess globally managed departmental systems to ensure ISMS standards are maintained. Based on the results of that analysis, if, as, and when necessary, we will subsequently implement a remediation plan that will include tools, training, and education to ensure (A) repeatable procedures are being implemented that protect the confidentiality, availability, and integrity of assets from threats and vulnerabilities in accordance with the ISMAISMS standards and protocols, and (B) that vulnerability testing is being performed, measured, and documented across our global operations landscape.
Outside of the ISMS and the internal security measures and data protections we have developed (and continue to improve), third parties may attempt to fraudulently induce employees, contractors or users to disclose information, including user names and passwords, to gain access to our customers’ data, our data or other confidential or sensitive information, and we may be the target of email scams that attempt to acquire personal information or our assets. Because techniques used to sabotage or obtain unauthorized access to systems change frequently and generally are not recognized until successfully launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques, react in a timely manner or implement adequate preventative measures. We devote significant financial and personnel resources to implement and maintain security measures; however, such resources may not be sufficient, and as cyber-securitycybersecurity threats develop, evolve and grow more complex over time, it may be necessary to make significant further investments to protect our data and infrastructure. If our security measures are compromised as a result of third-party action, employee or customer error, malfeasance, stolen or fraudulently obtained log-in credentials, or otherwise, our reputation and business could be damaged and we could incur significant liability. As we rely on third-party and public-cloud infrastructure, it depends in part on third-party security measures to protect against unauthorized access, cyberattacks, and the mishandling of customer data. A cybersecurity event could have significant costs, including regulatory enforcement actions, litigation, litigation indemnity obligations, remediation costs, network downtime, increases in insurance premiums, and reputational damage. These risks, as well as the number and frequency of cybersecurity events globally, may also be heightened during times of geopolitical tension or instability between countries.
A significant portion of our products will incorporate open source software, and we expect to incorporate open sourceopen-source software into other offerings or products in the future. Such open source software is generally licensed by its authors or other third parties under open sourceopen-source licenses. Little legal precedent governs the interpretation of these licenses; therefore, the potential impact of these terms on our business is unknown and may result in unanticipated obligations regarding our technologies. If a distributor of open source software were to allege that we had not complied with our license, we could be required to incur significant legal expenses. In addition, if the license terms for the open source code change we may be forced to re-engineer our software or incur additional costs. If we combine our proprietary software with open source software or utilizes open sourceopen-source software in a certain manner, under some open source licenses, we could be in breach of the license if we did not release the source code of our proprietary software. Releasing the source code could substantially help competitors develop products that are similar to or better than ours and could help malevolent actors detect security weaknesses to develop and deploy attacks, including malware, against our products and systems.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. We aim to comply with and perform the evaluations needed to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“SOX”). We may need to undertake various additional costly and time-consuming actions, such as implementing new internal controls and procedures and hiring accounting or internal audit staff, which may adversely affect our business, financial conditioncondition, and results of operations. We may not be able to complete our evaluation, testing and any required remediation in a timely manner. If we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective and our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to attest to management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which would cause the price of our common stock to decline, and we may be subject to investigation or sanctions by the SEC.
We are required, pursuant to Section 404 of SOX, to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024.2025. This assessment willis needrequired to include disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in our internal control over financial reporting, including theany existing material weakness, if not remediated. We are also required to disclose changes made in our internal control and procedures on a quarterly basis. In addition, our independent auditor is required to attest to management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.
Additionally, the existence of any material weakness, or any significant deficiency requires management to devote significant time and incur significant expense to remediate any such material weaknesses or significant deficiencies and management may not be able to remediate any such material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in a timely manner. The existence of any material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting could also result in errors in our financial statements that could require us to restate our financial statements, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations and cause shareholdersstockholders to lose confidence in our reported financial information, all of which could materially and adversely affect our business and stock price.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
Largest changes
“In a world where data is sprawling across hybrid work environments and generative AI technologies are rapidly emerging, AvePoint stands out with its platform-first strategy. By integrating features and solutions to optimize operations, AvePoint delivers more than basic security controls—it redefines how businesses manage their most sensitive data and critical assets. This holistic and automated approach enables organizations to secure the perimeter for sensitive data, strategically govern digital workspaces, and ensure compliance with evolving regulatory requirements.”see in full comparison
“As organizations rapidly embed AI into their core business processes, data has become both their most valuable asset and their greatest source of risk. AI systems amplify the consequences of poor data hygiene: overexposed sensitive information, accelerating compliance failures, and an increased blast radius from breaches and operational disruptions. As a result, enterprises require a modern data foundation that ensures data is discoverable, classified, governed, protected, and recoverable by design.”see in full comparison
“Guided by its Beyond Secure philosophy, AvePoint goes beyond traditional boundaries to inspire trust, enabling organizations to focus on innovation while protecting against data breaches and unauthorized access. For over 20 years, AvePoint has continually innovated to provide solutions that meet the demands of modern data management, empowering businesses to overcome challenges and unlock new possibilities in an ever-evolving landscape.”see in full comparison
“AvePoint is the global leader in modern data protection, delivering a unified platform that enables organizations to secure, govern, and operationalize data at scale. Serving customers of all sizes across every major industry and geography, AvePoint addresses one of the most critical challenges facing enterprises today: how to safely unlock the value of data in a world increasingly driven by artificial intelligence (“AI”).”see in full comparison
“By solving these challenges through a single, integrated platform, AvePoint enables organizations to reduce risk, lower complexity, and accelerate time to value from their data. In an era where trusted data is a prerequisite for AI adoption, data protection is no longer a back-office IT function, it is a strategic business imperative.”see in full comparison
“1. Legacy and fragmented data, which undermines visibility, governance, and AI readiness;”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (36)
AvePoint is the global leader in modern data protection, delivering a unified platform that enables organizations to secure, govern, and operationalize data at scale. Serving customers of all sizes across every major industry and geography, AvePoint addresses one of the most critical challenges facing enterprises today: how to safely unlock the value of data in a world increasingly driven by artificial intelligence (“AI”).
As organizations rapidly embed AI into their core business processes, data has become both their most valuable asset and their greatest source of risk. AI systems amplify the consequences of poor data hygiene: overexposed sensitive information, accelerating compliance failures, and an increased blast radius from breaches and operational disruptions. As a result, enterprises require a modern data foundation that ensures data is discoverable, classified, governed, protected, and recoverable by design.
The AvePoint Confidence Platform delivers this foundation. Purpose-built for today’s cloud-first environments, the platform addresses four pervasive and interconnected data challenges that directly impact enterprise risk, cost, and growth:
1. Legacy and fragmented data, which undermines visibility, governance, and AI readiness;
2. Overexposed data, which increases security, privacy, and regulatory risk;
3. Digital sprawl, which drives operational complexity and rising total cost of ownership; and 4. Data loss and interruption, which threaten business continuity and organizational resilience.
By solving these challenges through a single, integrated platform, AvePoint enables organizations to reduce risk, lower complexity, and accelerate time to value from their data. In an era where trusted data is a prerequisite for AI adoption, data protection is no longer a back-office IT function, it is a strategic business imperative.
AvePoint empowers organizations of all sizes, industries, and regions with its cloud-native data management software platform, enabling them to prepare, secure, and optimize their critical data. The AvePoint Confidence Platform unifies data security, governance, and business continuity into a seamless, resilient experience, addressing the most pressing challenges in today’s complex digital landscape.
In a world where data is sprawling across hybrid work environments and generative AI technologies are rapidly emerging, AvePoint stands out with its platform-first strategy. By integrating features and solutions to optimize operations, AvePoint delivers more than basic security controls—it redefines how businesses manage their most sensitive data and critical assets. This holistic and automated approach enables organizations to secure the perimeter for sensitive data, strategically govern digital workspaces, and ensure compliance with evolving regulatory requirements.
Organizations today face a host of challenges that make a robust data management strategy indispensable, including:
Guided by its Beyond Secure philosophy, AvePoint goes beyond traditional boundaries to inspire trust, enabling organizations to focus on innovation while protecting against data breaches and unauthorized access. For over 20 years, AvePoint has continually innovated to provide solutions that meet the demands of modern data management, empowering businesses to overcome challenges and unlock new possibilities in an ever-evolving landscape.
We believe ARR further enables measurement of our business performance, is an important metric for financial forecasting, and better enables us to make strategic business decisions. We calculate ARR as the annualized sum of contractually obligated Annual Contract Value (“ACV”) from SaaS, term license and support, and maintenance revenue sources from all active customers at the end of a reporting period.
Total revenue
increased
21.6%26.9%
to
$330.5$419.5
million for the year ended
December 31, 20242025
, primarily due to an increase in SaaS revenue, which
increased
43.3%38.4%
to
$230.7$319.2
million, and represented 70%76% of total revenue, up from 59%70% of total revenue in the prior year. TheTotal revenue growth was also due to an increase in SaaSServices revenue, which wasgrew driven22.3% byto strong$53.8 customermillion. demandThe forincreases ourin SaaS solutions,and wasServices revenue were, partially offset by an expected decrease in both term license and support and maintenance revenue.
While SaaS revenue growth was again driven by consistently strong customer demand for our SaaS solutions, Services revenue is expected to fluctuate as the services generally are not recurring in nature. Additionally, maintenance revenuerevenue, which is tied to the sale of perpetual licenses, is expected to continue decliningdeclining, as we haveno shiftedlonger awayoffer fromthese the sale of perpetual licenses and towards SaaS and term licenses. Without perpetual license sales, there will be limited opportunities to sell maintenance contractsproducts to new customers. ExistingAdditionally, existing maintenance customers have and will continue to transition to SaaS and term licenses, which will further support the continued decline in maintenance revenue.
For the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, North America revenues increased 14.7%21.3% to $135.9$164.8 million, driven by a 43.6%,34.7%, or $30.7$35.1 million, increase in SaaS revenue, partially offset by a $13.3$6.2 million combined net decrease in term license and support, services and maintenance revenue. EMEA revenues increased by 21.4%35.3% to $99.3$134.3 million, driven by a 39.8%,43.1%, or $23.8$36.0 million, increase in SaaS revenue, partially offset by a $6.3$0.9 million combined net decrease in term license and support, services and maintenance revenue. APAC revenues increased 33.2%26.2% to $95.4$120.4 million, primarily driven by a 49.2%,37.7%, or $15.2$17.4 million, increase in SaaS revenue, a 24.1%,26.3%, or $6.9$9.3 million, increase in services revenue, and a $1.7$2.5 million combined increase in term license and support andrevenue, partially offset by a $4.2 million decrease in maintenance revenue.
On a constant currency basis, EMEA revenues increased 29.7%, while EMEA SaaS revenues increased 37.0%. On a constant currency basis, APAC revenues increased 25.1%, while APAC SaaS revenues increased 37.5%.
Cost of revenue increased 6.5%31.8% to $82.5$108.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, driven primarily by a $3.0$12.2 million increase in aggregated hosting costs resulting from increased SaaS revenue and a $2.3$11.0 million increase in personnel costs resulting from increased SaaS revenue.costs.
Sales and marketing expenses increased 9.6%17.2% to $122.9$144.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, primarily driven by a $8.5$17.5 million increase in personnel costs, which included additional headcount and other investments in the business to respond to strong customer demand for our solutions and provide support for future growth. The continued decline in sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of revenue reflects the continuedongoing scaling of the company’s focus onCompany’s channel partnerships and strategiesstrategy as well as ongoingconsistent improvements in overall sales efficiency.
General and administrative expenses increased 13.0%17.1% to $69.2$81.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024.2025. The increase was primarily driven by a $3.9$7.2 million increase in personnel costscosts, anda $2.4$2.9 million inof new feescosts related to the Company’s investmentsecondary listing on the SGX-ST, and $1.9 million of net costs related to the discontinuation of the Company’s participation in aA3 growthVentures equityFund fund.1, L.P. (the "Fund").
Research and development expenses increased 34.0%8.0% to $48.7$52.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, primarily driven by a $10.7$2.2 million increase in personnel costs, which included additional headcount and ongoing investment in the development of new offerings and enhancements to existing offerings.offerings, and a $0.7 million increase in training and development costs.
Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 20242025 was $4.7$5.4 million as compared to $2.9$4.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The effective tax rate, which equals the income tax provision divided by pretax income (loss) from continuing operations, was 13.3% for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to (19.4)% for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to (15.5)% for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The change in effective tax rates for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023,2024, was primarily due to the mix of pre-tax income (loss) results by jurisdictions taxed at different rates than 21%, a permanent item recorded for stock-based compensation, GILTI, fair value of earnout liabilityGILTI and changes in the valuation allowance in the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions. The amount of the valuation allowance, however, could be reduced in the near term. The exact timing will be based on the level of profitability that we are able to achieve and our visibility into future results. Such a release would increase our effective tax rate in subsequent periods but would not affect cash paid for income taxes.
Non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin are non-GAAP financial measures that our management uses to assess our overall performance. We define non-GAAP operating income as GAAP operating income plus the following items: stock-based compensation andcompensation, the amortization of acquired intangible assets.assets, the costs associated with our secondary listing on the SGX-ST, and the costs associated with the discontinuation of our participation in the Fund. We define non-GAAP operating margin as non-GAAP operating income divided by revenue. We believe non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin provide our management and investors consistency and comparability with our past financial performance and facilitate period-to-period comparisons of operations, as these metrics eliminate the effects of stock-based compensation, which has had historical volatility from period to period due to mark-to-market securities, and of acquired intangible assets, which are unrelated to current operations and are neither comparable to the prior period nor predictive of future results. While the amortization expense of acquired intangible assets is excluded from certain non-GAAP measures, the revenue related to acquired intangible assets is reflected in such measures as those assets contribute to revenue generation. The elimination of the effect of variability caused by stock-based compensation expense and the amortization of acquired intangible assets, both of which are non-cash expenses, and the one-time nature of the costs associated with our secondary listing on the SGX-ST and the net costs associated with the discontinuation of our participation in the Fund, provides a better representation as to the overall operating performance of the company.Company. We use non-GAAP financial measures (a) to evaluate our historical and prospective financial performance and trends as well as our performance relative to our peers, (b) to set and approve spending budgets, (c) to allocate resources, (d) to measure operational profitability and the accuracy of forecasting, and (e) to assess financial discipline over operational expenditures.
GAAP operating margin for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 20232024 was 2.2%7.9% and (5.6)%,2.2%, respectively. Non-GAAP operating margin for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 20232024 was 14.4%18.9% and 8.1%,14.4%, respectively. The increase in both GAAP and non-GAAP operating marginmargins was primarily attributable to the Company’s enhancedrevenue focusgrowth on(in expensepart managementbenefitting andfrom the continued scaling of the Company’s channel partner strategy.strategy) as well as to the Company’s continued focus on expense management, while GAAP operating margins also improved due to the Company’s ongoing management of stock-based compensation expense, which represented less than 10% of total revenue in the year ended December 31, 2025.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had $290.7$481.1 million in cash and cash equivalents, $0.2 million in short-term investmentsequivalents and no outstanding debt.
Our short-term liquidity needs primarily include working capital for sales and marketing, research and development, and continued innovation. In addition, we extended a credit facility with a remaining commitment of $1.5 million, and committed $50.0 million to a growth equity fund. We also have letters of credit issued in the amount of $1.0 million as security for operating leases, and $4.4$5.4 million as security for customer contingency agreements. In addition, we extended a credit facility with a remaining commitment of $1.5 million, and a committed $50.0 million to the Fund. Our long-term capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our growth rate, levels of revenue, the expansion of sales and marketing activities, market acceptance of our platform, the results of business initiatives, and the timing of new product introductions. Refer to “Note 12 - Commitments and Contingencies” for more information regarding the purchase commitments.
Net cash
provided by operating activities for the year ended
December 31, 2024,2025, was
$88.9$85.3 million, reflecting our
net lossincome of
$29.1$35.1 million, adjusted for non-cash items of
$89.3$60.5 million and net cash
inflowsoutflows of
$28.8$10.4 million from changes in our operating assets and liabilities. The main considerations for non-cash items were stock-based compensation, which reflects ongoing compensation charges for the entity’s equity- and pre-merger liability-classified awards, operating lease right-of-use asset expense and mark to market adjustments on earnoutdepreciation and warrant liabilities.amortization. The main considerations of changes in operating assets and liabilities that resulted in cash inflows related to an increase in deferred revenue that is partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable as a result of business growth. This was partially offset by cash outflows related to an increase in deferred contract costs and operating lease liabilities.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2023,2024, was $34.7$88.9 million, reflecting our net loss of $21.5$29.1 million, adjusted for non-cash items of $58.6$89.3 million and net cash outflowsinflows of $2.4$28.8 million from changes in our operating assets and liabilities. The main considerations for non-cash items were stock-based compensation, which reflects ongoing compensation charges for the entity’s equity- and pre-merger liability-classified awards, operating lease right-of-use asset expense and mark to market adjustments on earnout and warrant liabilities. The main considerations of changes in operating assets and liabilities that resulted in cash outflows related to an increase in deferred contract costs and operating lease liabilities. This was partially offset by cash inflows related to an increase in deferred revenue that is partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable as a result of business growth. This was partially offset by cash outflows related to an increase in deferred contract costs and operating lease liabilities.
Net cash
used in investing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2024, was
$2.6 million, primarily consisting of $3.0 million of purchases of property and equipment, $1.8 million in the purchase of investments, $1.8 million investment in notes, and $1.2 million in software development, partially offset by $5.4 million in maturities of short-term investments.
Net cash
used in investing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2023,2025, was
$5.6$20.2 mill
ion,million, primarily consisting of $3.5$14.9 million paid in thea purchasebusiness of investments, $2.1acquisition,
$3.7 million of purchases of property and equipment, $1.4and $1.6 million in software development, and $1.3 million investment in notes, partially offset by $2.6 million in maturities of short-term investments.development.
Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2024, was $2.6 mill ion, primarily consisting of $3.0 million of purchases of property and equipment, $1.8 million in the purchase of investments, $1.8 million investment in notes, and $1.2 million in software development, partially offset by the release of $5.4 million of certificates of deposit that were replaced by a sublimit of our line of credit.
Net cash
used in financing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2024, was
$15.5 million, primarily due to $33.1 million in purchases of common stock, $6.1 million in the redemption of the redeemable noncontrolling interest of MaivenPoint, and $4.0 million in the purchase of public warrants, partially offset by $17.2 million of proceeds from the exercising of warrants, and $11.0 million of proceeds from the exercising of stock options.
Net cash
usedprovided inby financing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2023,2025, was
$33.7
$124.0 million, primarily dueconsisting toof $39.0$168.2 million of proceeds from the exercises of warrants and, $17.7 million of proceeds from the exercises of stock options, partially offset by $49.8 million in purchases of common stock,stock partiallyand offset by $5.6$12.1 million ofto proceeds fromrepurchase the exercisingnoncontrolling ofinterest stockin options.MaivenPoint Pte. Ltd.
Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2024, was $15.5 million, primarily consisting of $33.1 million in purchases of common stock, $6.1 million in the redemption of the redeemable noncontrolling interest of MaivenPoint, and $4.0 million in the purchase of public warrants, partially offset by $17.2 million of proceeds from the exercising of warrants, and $11.0 million of proceeds from the exercising of stock options.
The Loan Agreement provides for a revolving line of credit of up to $30.0 million, with an additional $20.0 million accordion feature for additional capital we may draw upon at our request. Borrowings under the line bear interest at a rate equal to term SOFR plus 3.0% to 3.3% depending on the Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio. The line carries an unused fee at a rate equal to 0.5%. Any proceeds of borrowings under the Loan Agreement will be used for general corporate purposes.
We are obligated under various non-cancelable operating leases for office space.space and other facilities. The initial terms of the leases expire on various dates through 2030.2032. During the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, total rent expense for facilities amounted to $7.2$9.2 million and $6.8$7.2 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2024,2025, letters of credit have been issued in the amount of $1.0 million as security for operating leases. The letters of credit are secured by certificatesa sublimit of deposit and aour line of credit.credit (refer to “Note 9 - Line of Credit” for further details).
For information about recent accounting pronouncements, see “Note 2 to- theSummary consolidatedof financialSignificant statementsAccounting Policies” in Part II, Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
Our operations and financial results are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including those described in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report, which risks and uncertainties could affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and the trading price of our common stock. There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report. We urge you to read the risk factors in our Annual Report.
Items 2, 3 and 4
No wording changes found in this section.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and June 30, 2025”
New heading “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”
New heading “Sales and Marketing”
New heading “General and Administrative”
New heading “Research and Development”
New heading “Income Tax Provision”
Largest changes
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (65)
FirstSecond Quarter 2026 Business Highlights
Comparison of Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and MarchJune 31,30, 2025
The components of AvePoint’s revenue during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows:
Total revenue increased 26.0%22.0% to $117.2$124.5 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, primarily due to an increase in SaaS revenue, which increased 35.5%27.4% to $93.4$98.5 million,million and represented 80% of total revenue, up from 74% of total revenue in the prior year. The increase in SaaS revenue, which was driven by strong customer demand for our SaaS solutions,solutions. wasSaaS partiallyrepresented offset79% byof antotal expectedrevenue, decreaseup from 76% of total revenue in termthe licenseprior and support revenues.year. The growth in total revenue was also due to an increase in services revenue, which grew 33.0%8.6% to $14.5$15.7 million. Services revenue is expected to fluctuate as the services generally are not recurring in nature.
Revenue by geographic region for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 was as follows:
For the three months ended June 30, 2026, North America revenue increased 23.1% to $48.7 million, primarily driven by a 26.9%, or $8.7 million, increase in SaaS revenue. EMEA revenues increased 26.6% to $40.3 million, driven by a 28.2%, or $8.2 million, increase in SaaS revenue. APAC revenues increased 15.9% to $35.5 million, primarily driven by a 27.0%, or $4.3 million, increase in SaaS revenue, as well as a 6.3% or $0.8 million increase in services revenue.
For the three months ended March 31, 2026, North America revenue increased 21.2% to $44.2 million, driven by a 31.6%, or $9.5 million, increase in SaaS revenue, partially offset by a combined $1.8 million decrease in term license and support and services revenues. EMEA revenues increased 30.4% to $38.4 million, driven by a 39.1%, or $9.8 million, increase in SaaS revenue, partially offset by a combined $0.9 million decrease in term license and support and services revenues. APAC revenues increased 27.7% to $34.6 million, primarily driven by a 37.1%, or $5.1 million, increase in SaaS revenue and a 46.3% or $4.1 million increase in services revenue, partially offset by a $1.7 million decrease in term license and support revenues.
Cost of revenue, gross profit, and gross margin during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows:
Cost of revenue increased 33.4%26.5% to $31.9$33.5 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, primarily driven by a $3.8$3.5 million increase from higher aggregate hosting costs resulting from increased SaaS revenue and a $3.4$2.7 million increase in personnel costs.
Sales and marketing expenses during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows:
Sales and marketing expenses increased 21.7%27.3% to $42.0$45.5 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, primarily driven by a $6.3$7.0 million increase in personnel costs.costs and a $1.3 million increase in marketing spend.
General and administrative expenses during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows:
General and administrative expenses decreased 9.6%5.3% to $16.9$18.7 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, primarily driven by a $1.7$1.3 million decrease in stock-based compensation expense.
Research and development expenses during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows:
Research and development expenses
increased
8.4%
27.8% to
$13.8
$16.6 million for the three months ended
March 31,June 2026
,30, 2026, primarily driven by a $0.3$2.6 million increase in personnel costs and a $0.3$0.5 million increase in softwaretraining maintenanceand expense.professional development.
Income tax (benefit) expense during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 was as follows:
AvePoint’sOur income tax expensebenefit for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $1.3$15.6 million, as compared to a tax expense of $1.3$4.0 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The effective tax rate was 7.8%(129.5)% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to 26.8%57.8% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The change in effective tax rates was primarily due to the mix of pre-tax income results by jurisdictions taxed at different rates, certainpartial jurisdictions with separate tax expense calculated, impactrelease of U.S. valuation allowance, foreign inclusions and stock-based compensation.
InBased assessingon thean needassessment for a valuation allowance, the Company has consideredof all available positive and negative evidenceevidence, including itsour historical levels of income, expectations of future taxable income, future reversals of existing taxable temporary differencesdifferences, and ongoing taxtax-planning planningstrategies, strategies.management Ifconcluded in the future, the Company determinesthat it iswas more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will notwould be realized,realized. During the three months ended June 30, 2026, the Company mayrecorded set up a valuation allowance, which may result inan income tax benefit of $15.6 million, primarily attributable to a $19.9 million release of the valuation allowance on certain deferred tax assets, partially offset by tax expense associated with stock-based compensation activity and other discrete items. The Company continues to maintain valuation allowances against certain deferred tax assets in theU.S. Company’s condensed consolidated statements of incomestate and condensedforeign consolidated statements of comprehensive income.jurisdictions.
Item 2
Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and June 30, 2025
Revenue
The components of our revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows:
Total revenue increased 23.9% to $241.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, primarily due to an increase in SaaS revenue, which increased 31.2% to $191.9 million, and represented 79% of total revenue, up from 75% of total revenue in the prior year. The increase in SaaS revenue, which was driven by strong customer demand for our SaaS solutions, was partially offset by an expected decrease in term license and support revenues. The growth in total revenue was also due to an increase in services revenue, which grew 19.1% to $30.3 million. Services revenue is expected to fluctuate as the services generally are not recurring in nature.
Revenue by geographic region for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 was as follows:
For the six months ended June 30, 2026, North America revenue increased 22.2% to $92.9 million, driven by a 29.2%, or $18.2 million, increase in SaaS revenue, partially offset by a $1.4 million decrease in term license and support revenues. EMEA revenues increased 28.4% to $78.7 million, primarily driven by a 33.3%, or $18.0 million increase in SaaS revenue. APAC revenues increased 21.4% to $70.1 million, primarily driven by a 31.7%, or $9.4 million, increase in SaaS revenue and a 23.2% or $4.9 million increase in services revenue, partially offset by a $1.9 million decrease in term license and support revenues.
On a constant currency basis, EMEA revenues increased 21.3%, while EMEA SaaS revenues increased 25.8%. On a constant currency basis, APAC revenues increased 18.9%, while APAC SaaS revenues increased 29.3%.
Item 2
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In addition to our financial results determined in accordance with GAAP, we disclose non-GAAP cost of revenue, non-GAAP gross profit, non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP sales and marketing expense, non-GAAP general and administrative expense, non-GAAP research and development expense, non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin.
We believe these non-GAAP measures aid investors by providing additional insight into our operational performance and into trends affecting our business. Management uses these non-GAAP financial measures to understand and compare operating results across accounting periods, for internal budgeting and forecasting purposes, and to evaluate financial performance.
Non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin should not be considered as an alternative to operating income, operating margin or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP as measures of performance. Non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP.
Cost of Revenue, Gross Profit, and Gross Margin
Cost of revenue, gross profit, and gross margin during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows:
Cost of revenue increased 29.7% to $65.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, primarily driven by a $7.3 million increase from higher aggregate hosting costs resulting from increased SaaS revenue and a $6.2 million increase in personnel costs.
Item 2
Operating Expenses
Sales and Marketing
Sales and marketing expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows:
Sales and marketing expenses increased 24.5% to $87.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, primarily driven by a $13.3 million increase in personnel costs and a $1.1 million increase in marketing spend.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows:
General and administrative expenses decreased 7.4% to $35.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, primarily driven by a $3.1 million decrease in stock-based compensation expense.
Item 2
Research and Development
Research and development expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows:
Research and development expenses increased 18.2% to $30.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 , primarily driven by a $2.9 million increase in personnel costs, a $0.6 million increase in software maintenance expense, and a $0.6 million increase in training and professional development.
Income Tax Provision
Income tax (benefit) expense during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 was as follows:
AvePoint’s income tax benefit for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was $14.3 million, compared to a tax expense of $5.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The effective tax rate was (50.0)% for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to 44.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The change in effective tax rates was primarily due to the mix of pre-tax income results by jurisdictions taxed at different rates, certain jurisdictions with separate tax expense calculated, foreign inclusions and stock-based compensation.
Based on an assessment of all available positive and negative evidence, including our historical levels of income, expectations of future taxable income, future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, and ongoing tax-planning strategies, management concluded that it was more likely than not that these deferred tax assets would be realized. During the six months ended June 30, 2026, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of $14.3 million, primarily attributable to a $19.9 million release of the valuation allowance on certain deferred tax assets, partially offset by tax expense associated with stock-based compensation activity and other discrete items. The Company continues to maintain valuation allowances against certain deferred tax assets in U.S. state and foreign jurisdictions.
Non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin are non-GAAP financial measures that our management uses to assess our overall performance. We define non-GAAP operating income as GAAP operating income plus stock-based compensation and the amortization of acquired intangible assets and expenses related to the secondary listing on the SGX-ST and the discontinuation of the Company'sour participation in the Fund. We define non-GAAP operating margin as non-GAAP operating income divided by revenue. We believe non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin provide our management and investors consistency and comparability with our past financial performance and facilitate period-to-period comparisons of operations, as these metrics eliminate the effects of stock-based compensation, which has had historical volatility from period to period due to mark-to-market securities, and of acquired intangible assets, which are unrelated to current operations and are neither comparable to the prior period nor predictive of future results. The elimination of the effect of variability caused by stock-based compensation expense and the amortization of acquired intangible assets, both of which are non-cash expenses, provides a better representation as to theour overall operating performance of the Company.performance. We use non-GAAP financial measures (a) to evaluate our historical and prospective financial performance and trends as well as our performance relative to our peers, (b) to set and approve spending budgets, (c) to allocate resources, (d) to measure operational profitability and the accuracy of forecasting, and (e) to assess financial discipline over operational expenditures.
GAAP operating margin for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 was 10.9%8.2% and 3.5%,7.0%, respectively. Non-GAAP operating margin for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 was 17.5%16.3% and 14.4%,18.4%, respectively. The increaseyear-over-year decrease in non-GAAP operating margin was primarily attributable to theour Company’splan enhancedto focusincrease oninvestments expense management and continued scaling ofacross the Company’sbusiness channelin partner strategy.2026.
GAAP operating margin for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 was 9.5% and 5.3%, respectively. Non-GAAP operating margin for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 was 16.9% and 16.5%, respectively.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had $444.1$417.3 million in cash and cash equivalents and no outstanding debt.
Our short-term liquidity needs primarily include working capital for sales and marketing, research and development, and continued innovation. We have letters of credit issued in the amount of $1.0$1.2 million as security for operating leases, and $5.4 million as security for customer contingency agreements. Our long-term capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our growth rate, levels of revenue, the expansion of sales and marketing activities, market acceptance of our platform, the results of business initiatives, and the timing of new product introductions. See “Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies” in Part I, Item 1 “Financial Statements” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for more information regarding the purchase commitments.
We also maintain a loan and security agreement (the “Loan Agreement”), dated November 3, 2023, with HSBC Bank USA, National Association, (“HSBC”), as lender, for a revolving line of credit of up to $30.0 million with an accordion feature that provides up to $20.0 million of additional borrowing capacity we may draw upon at our request. The line bears interest at a rate equal to term SOFR plus 3.0% to 3.3% depending on the Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Loan Agreement). The line carries an unused fee equal to 0.5%. The line will mature on November 3, 2026. We are required to maintain a minimum Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Loan Agreement) as well as a maximum Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio, tested by HSBC each quarter. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, we pledged, assigned and granted HSBC a security interest in all shares of our subsidiaries, future proceeds, and assets as security for our obligations under the Loan Agreement. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we are compliant with all covenants and had no borrowings outstanding under the Loan Agreement.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $24.3$40.2 million, reflecting AvePoint’s net income of $15.3$42.8 million, adjusted for non-cash items of $9.9$5.3 million and net cash outflows of $0.9$7.9 million from changes in operating assets and liabilities. The primary drivers of non-cash items were stock-based compensation and was partially offset by foreign currency remeasurement losses.gains. The drivers of changes in operating assets and liabilities are seasonal in nature. These drivers are related to a decrease in accounts receivable due primarily to the timing of customer invoices and aan decreaseincrease in deferred revenue, offset by an increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets primarily related to prepaid rent,software anmaintenance increaseand in deferred revenue, offset bysubscription, a decrease in accrued expenses primarily due to accrued bonuses, commissions and payroll taxes.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 was $0.5$20.8 million, reflecting AvePoint’s net income of $3.6$6.5 million, adjusted for non-cash items of $14.0$32.8 million and net cash outflows of $17.1$18.5 million from changes in operating assets and liabilities. The primary driver of non-cash items was stock-based compensation which reflects ongoing compensation and wasforeign partiallycurrency offsetremeasurement by a decrease in the mark to market value of warrant liabilities.losses. The drivers of changes in operating assets and liabilities are seasonal in nature. These drivers are related to a decrease in accounts receivable due primarily to the timing of customer invoices and a decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets primarily related to prepaid rent, an increase in deferred revenue, offset by a decrease in accrued expenses primarily due to accrued bonuses, commissions and payroll taxes.
Net cash used in investing activities for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $1.6$3.4 million. It primarily consisted of $1.3$2.5 million of purchases of property and equipment, and $0.4$1.0 million from the capitalization of internal use software.
Net cash used in investing activities for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 was $16.9$18.2 million. It primarily consisted of $14.9 million cash paid in business acquisitions, $1.5$2.5 million of purchases of property and equipment, and $0.5$0.8 million from the capitalization of internal use software.
AVPT insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 6 filings (1 insider, 8 trade dates, 140,000 shares, about $1.9M; 6 of these filings say the sales were made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan). Net open-market shares: -140,000 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$1.9M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-30 | Brown Brian Michael |
Open-market sale |
10,000 | $14.11 | $141.1K |
| 2026-09-23 | Brown Brian Michael |
Open-market sale |
10,000 | $13.07 | $130.7K |
| 2026-09-14 | Caci James |
Shares withheld for tax | 2,517 | $13.60 | $34.2K |
| 2026-09-14 | Brown Brian Michael |
Shares withheld for tax | 1,875 | $13.60 | $25.5K |
| 2026-09-11 | Jiang Tianyi |
Shares withheld for tax | 2,914 | $12.66 | $36.9K |
| 2026-09-11 | Gong Xunkai |
Shares withheld for tax | 3,137 | $12.66 | $39.7K |
| 2026-09-11 | Caci James |
Shares withheld for tax | 6,120 | $12.66 | $77.5K |
| 2026-09-11 | Brown Brian Michael |
Shares withheld for tax | 5,010 | $12.66 | $63.4K |
| 2026-09-04 | Jiang Tianyi |
Shares withheld for tax | 968 | $13.43 | $13.0K |
| 2026-09-04 | Jiang Tianyi |
Shares withheld for tax | 3,422 | $13.43 | $46.0K |
| 2026-09-04 | Gong Xunkai |
Shares withheld for tax | 1,041 | $13.43 | $14.0K |
| 2026-09-04 | Gong Xunkai |
Shares withheld for tax | 3,683 | $13.43 | $49.5K |
| 2026-09-04 | Caci James |
Shares withheld for tax | 388 | $13.43 | $5.2K |
| 2026-09-04 | Caci James |
Shares withheld for tax | 3,957 | $13.43 | $53.1K |
| 2026-09-04 | Caci James |
Shares withheld for tax | 1,369 | $13.43 | $18.4K |
| 2026-09-04 | Brown Brian Michael |
Shares withheld for tax | 277 | $13.43 | $3.7K |
| 2026-09-04 | Brown Brian Michael |
Shares withheld for tax | 2,834 | $13.43 | $38.1K |
| 2026-09-04 | Brown Brian Michael |
Shares withheld for tax | 981 | $13.43 | $13.2K |
| 2026-09-01 | Jiang Tianyi |
Gift | 36,000 | $13.50 | $486.0K |
| 2026-08-27 | Brown Brian Michael |
Open-market sale |
60,000 | $14.20 | $852.0K |
| 2026-08-24 | Brown Brian Michael |
Open-market sale |
10,000 | $13.30 | $133.0K |
| 2026-07-29 | Brown Brian Michael |
Open-market sale |
5,176 | $13.06 | $67.6K |
| 2026-07-28 | Brown Brian Michael |
Open-market sale |
4,824 | $13.08 | $63.1K |
| 2026-07-15 | Brown Brian Michael |
Open-market sale |
31,631 | $13.18 | $416.9K |
| 2026-07-14 | Brown Brian Michael |
Open-market sale |
8,369 | $13.00 | $108.8K |
| 2026-06-22 | Gong Xunkai |
Option exercise | 743,529 | $9.97 | $7.4M |
| 2026-06-22 | Gong Xunkai |
Option exercise | 205,913 | $9.97 | $2.1M |
| 2026-06-18 | Brown Brian Michael |
Option exercise | 50,492 | $10.41 | $525.6K |
| 2026-06-12 | Jiang Tianyi |
Shares withheld for tax | 2,914 | $10.87 | $31.7K |
| 2026-06-12 | Gong Xunkai |
Shares withheld for tax | 3,788 | $10.87 | $41.2K |
| 2026-06-12 | Caci James |
Shares withheld for tax | 2,517 | $10.87 | $27.4K |
| 2026-06-12 | Caci James |
Shares withheld for tax | 6,120 | $10.87 | $66.5K |
| 2026-06-12 | Brown Brian Michael |
Shares withheld for tax | 5,010 | $10.87 | $54.5K |
| 2026-06-12 | Brown Brian Michael |
Shares withheld for tax | 1,875 | $10.87 | $20.4K |
| 2026-06-05 | Jiang Tianyi |
Shares withheld for tax | 3,423 | $10.74 | $36.8K |
| 2026-06-05 | Jiang Tianyi |
Shares withheld for tax | 969 | $10.74 | $10.4K |
| 2026-06-05 | Gong Xunkai |
Shares withheld for tax | 4,449 | $10.74 | $47.8K |
| 2026-06-05 | Gong Xunkai |
Shares withheld for tax | 1,259 | $10.74 | $13.5K |
| 2026-06-05 | Caci James |
Shares withheld for tax | 3,957 | $10.74 | $42.5K |
| 2026-06-05 | Caci James |
Shares withheld for tax | 388 | $10.74 | $4.2K |
| 2026-06-05 | Caci James |
Shares withheld for tax | 1,369 | $10.74 | $14.7K |
| 2026-06-05 | Brown Brian Michael |
Shares withheld for tax | 278 | $10.74 | $3.0K |
| 2026-06-05 | Brown Brian Michael |
Shares withheld for tax | 981 | $10.74 | $10.5K |
| 2026-06-05 | Brown Brian Michael |
Shares withheld for tax | 2,835 | $10.74 | $30.4K |
| 2026-06-04 | Brown Brian Michael |
Shares withheld for tax | 27 | $10.89 | $294 |
| 2026-06-01 | Epstein Jeff |
Grant/award | 16,493 | $11.52 | $190.0K |
| 2026-06-01 | Ho John Chi On |
Grant/award | 16,493 | $11.52 | $190.0K |
| 2026-06-01 | Teper Jeff |
Grant/award | 16,493 | $11.52 | $190.0K |
| 2026-06-01 | Schijns Janet |
Grant/award | 16,493 | $11.52 | $190.0K |
Well-known investors holding AVPT (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. E. Shaw & Co. | 2026-06-30 | 4,493,297 | $50.4M | 0.03% | Reduced 18% |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 3,325,017 | $37.3M | 0.03% | Added 15% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 1,807,042 | $20.3M | 0.01% | Added 412% |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 1,621,153 | $18.2M | 0.03% | Reduced 37% |
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 1,590,600 | $17.8M | 0.01% | Added 111% |
| Gotham Asset Management (Joel Greenblatt) | 2026-06-30 | 689,914 | $7.7M | 0.02% | Reduced 15% |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 272,314 | $3.1M | 0.0% | Reduced 61% |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 188,208 | $2.1M | 0.0% | Reduced 76% |