AVXL 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Anavex Life Sciences Corp. · Nasdaq · Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances) · CIK 1314052 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Risks Related to the Discovery and Development of Our Current and Future Product Candidates”
New heading “The marketing approval process for pharmaceutical products is a lengthy, complex and highly regulated process and we cannot predict the outcome of any interactions with the regulatory authorities or when we will receive marketing approval, if at all.”
New heading “Obtaining and maintaining regulatory approval of blarcamesine or any future product candidates in one jurisdiction does not mean that we will be successful in obtaining regulatory approval of those product candidates in other jurisdictions.”
New heading “Our business could be affected by litigation, government investigations and enforcement actions.”
New heading “Changes in U.S. and international trade policies may adversely impact our business and operating results.”
Removed heading “If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud. As a result, stockholders could lose confidence in our financial and other public reporting, which would harm our business and the trading price of our common stock.”
Removed heading “Our disclosure controls and procedures may not prevent or detect all errors or acts of fraud.”
Largest changes
“We currently operate in a number of jurisdictions in a highly regulated industry and we could be subject to litigation, government investigation and enforcement actions on a variety of matters in the United States or foreign jurisdictions, including, without limitation, intellectual property, regulatory, product liability, environmental, whistleblower, false claims, privacy, anti-kickback, anti-bribery, securities, commercial, employment and other claims and legal proceedings which may arise from conducting our business. In the ordinary course as a public company, the SEC and other U.S. …”see in full comparison
“Legal proceedings, government investigations and enforcement actions can be expensive and time-consuming. An adverse outcome resulting from any such proceedings, investigations or enforcement actions could result in significant damages, awards, fines, penalties, exclusion from the federal healthcare programs, healthcare debarment, injunctive relief, product recalls, reputational damage and modifications of our business practices, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. …”see in full comparison
“Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, our management is required to report upon the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We cannot assure you that there will not be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting in the future. Any failure to maintain internal control over financial reporting could severely inhibit our ability to accurately report our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. …”see in full comparison
“Our business could be affected by litigation, government investigations and enforcement actions.”see in full comparison
“The U.S. government has made statements and taken actions that have led to certain changes and may lead to additional changes to U.S. and international trade policies. For example, President Trump has imposed or signaled to impose a series of tariffs on certain products manufactured outside the United States, including pharmaceutical products and raw materials and components for pharmaceutical products, and it is unknown whether and to what extent additional tariffs (or other new laws or regulations) will be adopted, or the effect that any such actions would have on us or our industry. …”see in full comparison
“If any of our compounds are approved, our product labeling, advertising and promotion will also be subject to regulatory requirements and ongoing regulatory review. The FDA strictly regulates the promotional claims that may be made about drug products. In particular, a drug may not be promoted for uses that are not approved by the FDA as reflected in the drug’s approved labeling. If we receive marketing approval for a compound, physicians may nevertheless lawfully prescribe it to their patients in a manner that is inconsistent with the approved label. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (50)
Obtaining and maintaining our patent protection
depends on compliance with various requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies. Changes in patent law could impair our ability
to protect our product candidates; and
We are an earlya clinical stage pharmaceutical research
research and development company and may never be able to successfully develop marketable products or generate any revenue. We have a
very limited
relevant operating history upon which an evaluation of our future performance and prospects can be made. There is no assurance that our
our future operations will result in profits. If we cannot generate sufficient revenues, we may suspend or cease operations.
We are an earlya clinical stage company and have not generated
generated any revenues to date and have no operating history.date. Moreover, we cannot be certain that our research and development efforts
will be successful or, if successful, that
our potential drug compounds will ever be approved for sale to pharmaceutical companies or
generate commercial revenues. We have noa very
limited relevant operating history upon which an evaluation of our performance and prospects can be made.
We are subject to all of the
business risks associated with a newpre-revenue enterprise,company, including, but not limited to, risks of unforeseen capital
requirements, failure
of potential drug compounds either in non-clinical testing or in clinical trials, failure to establish business
relationships and competitive
disadvantages against larger and more established companies. If we fail to become profitable, we may suspend
or cease operations.
We will need additional funding and may be unable
to raise additional capital
when needed, which would force us to delay, reduce or eliminate our research and development activities.
To date, we have funded our operations primarily through issuances of shares at-the-market sales agreements pursuant to which we offer and sell shares of common stock registered under an effective registration statement from time to time through a sales agent and, historically, also through a Purchase Agreement with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (“Lincoln Park”) pursuant to which the Company could direct Lincoln Park to purchase shares of common stock registered under an effective registration. The Company will need to file a prospectus supplement in order to access funds under the 2023 Purchase Agreement and the 2023 Purchase Agreement will expire on February 3, 2026.
To date, we have funded our operations primarily through
private placement of our equity securities, through issuances of shares under the Purchase Agreement with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC
(“Lincoln Park”) pursuant to which the Company may direct Lincoln Park to purchase shares of common stock registered under
an effective registration statement, or, historically, through draws under our “at-the-market offering” in connection with
the Amended and Restated Sales Agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. and SVB Leerink LLC (the “Sales Agents”), pursuant
to which we could offer and sell shares of common stock registered under an effective registration statement from time to time through
the Sales Agents. The Company terminated the Sales Agreement in July 2024. We will need to raise additional fundingfunding, and the
current economic
conditions may have a negative impact on our ability to raise additional needed capital on terms that are favorable to
our Company or
at all. We may not be able to generate significant revenues for several years, if at all. Until we can generate significant
revenues, revenues,
if ever, we expect to satisfy our future cash needs through equity or convertible debt financing. We cannot be certain that
additional funding will
be available on acceptable terms, or at all. If adequate funds are not available, we may be required to delay,
reduce the scope of, or
eliminate one or more of our research and development activities.
A prolonged decline in the price of our common stock could result in a reduction in our ability to raise capital. Because our operations have been financed through the sale of equity securities, a decline in the price of our common stock could be especially detrimental to our continued operations. Any reduction in our ability to raise equity capital in the future would force us to reallocate funds from other planned uses and would have a significant negative effect on our business plans and operations, including our ability to develop new products and continue our current operations. If our stock price declines, we may be forced to sell equity securities at such lower prices resulting in significant dilution to existing investors. We believe the following factors could cause the market price of our common stock to continue to fluctuate widely and could cause our common stock to trade lower:
Risks Related to the Discovery and Development of Our Current and Future Product Candidates
The marketing approval process for pharmaceutical products is a lengthy, complex and highly regulated process and we cannot predict the outcome of any interactions with the regulatory authorities or when we will receive marketing approval, if at all.
The regulatory approval processes of the EMA, the FDA, and other comparable foreign authorities are lengthy, time-consuming and inherently unpredictable, and the approval process can vary significantly depending on the regulatory authority. Relevant health authorities may, at the time of the filing of the application for a marketing authorization, or later during their review, impose requirements that can evolve over time, including requiring additional clinical trials, and such authorities may delay or refuse to grant approval. On November 14, 2025, we announced that the CHMP of the EMA has rendered a negative trend vote following an oral explanation of our MAA. The CHMP is expected to adopt a formal opinion on the MAA at its December meeting. We plan to seek a re-examination of the MAA upon its formal adoption. However, we cannot predict the outcome of any interactions with the regulatory authorities and when we will receive a marketing approval, if at all.
In recent years, health authorities have become increasingly focused on product safety and on the risk/benefit profile of pharmaceutical products, which could lead to more burdensome and costly approval processes and negatively affect our ability to obtain regulatory approval for products under development. For example, the FDA and the EMA have been implementing strict requirements for approval, particularly in terms of the volume of data needed to demonstrate a product’s efficacy and safety.
Obtaining and maintaining regulatory approval of blarcamesine or any future product candidates in one jurisdiction does not mean that we will be successful in obtaining regulatory approval of those product candidates in other jurisdictions.
Obtaining and maintaining regulatory approval of blarcamesine and any future product candidates in one jurisdiction does not guarantee that we will be able to obtain or maintain regulatory approval in any other jurisdiction, while a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one jurisdiction may have a negative effect on the regulatory approval process in others. Approval procedures vary among jurisdictions and can involve requirements and administrative review periods different from each other, including additional preclinical studies or clinical trials, as clinical trials conducted in one jurisdiction may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions. In many jurisdictions outside the U.S., including Canada, and certain jurisdictions in the EU, a product candidate must be approved for reimbursement before it can be approved for sale in that jurisdiction. In some cases, the price that we intend to charge for our products is also subject to approval.
Regulatory authorities in jurisdictions outside of the U.S. have requirements for approval of product candidates with which we must comply prior to marketing in those jurisdictions and such regulatory requirements can vary widely from country to country. Obtaining other regulatory approvals and compliance with other regulatory requirements could result in significant delays, difficulties and costs for us and could require additional preclinical studies or clinical trials, which could be costly and time-consuming and could delay or prevent the introduction of our products in certain countries. The foreign regulatory approval process involves all of the risks associated with FDA approval. We do not have experience in obtaining regulatory approval in international markets or within the United States. If we fail to comply with the regulatory requirements in international or domestic markets and/or obtain and maintain applicable marketing approvals, our target market will be reduced and our ability to realize the full market potential of blarcamesine or any future product candidates will be harmed.
It willmay take several years before we can develop potentially
marketable products, if at all. Our research and development plans will require substantial additional capital, arising from costs to:
We base our outlook regarding the need for funds on
many uncertain variables. Such uncertainties include the success of our research initiatives, regulatory approvals, the timing of events
outside our direct control such as negotiations with potential strategic partners and other factors. Any of these uncertain events can
significantly change our cash requirements as they determinemay suchinvolve one-time events such as the receipt or payment of major milestones and
other other
payments.
Additional funds maywill be required to support our operationsoperations,
including commercialization of our product candidates, and if we are unable to obtain them on favorable terms, we may be required to cease
or reduce certain further research and development
and commercialization programs of our drug product platform, sell some or all our intellectual
property, merge with another entity or scale back operations.
Companion diagnostics are subject to regulation by
the FDAFDA, EMA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities as medical devices and will likely require separate regulatory approval prior
to to
commercialization. If we or third parties are unable to successfully develop companion diagnostics for our drug candidates, or experience
delays in doing so:
Even if our drug candidates and any associated companion diagnostics are approved for marketing, the need for companion diagnostics may slow or limit adoption of our drug candidates. Our drug candidates may be perceived negatively compared to alternative treatments that do not require the use of companion diagnostics, either due to the additional cost of the companion diagnostic or the need to complete additional [testing?] prior to administering our drug candidates.
The regulatory approval processes of the FDAFDA,
EMA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities are lengthy, time-consuming and inherently unpredictable, which could lead to our inability
to generate product revenue.
The time required to obtain approval by the FDAFDA, EMA
and
comparable foreign regulatory authorities is unpredictable, typically takes many years following the commencement of clinical trials
and and
depends upon numerous factors, including the type, complexity and novelty of the product candidates involved. Seeking foreign regulatory
approvals could result in significant delays, difficulties and costs for us and may require additional preclinical studies or clinical
trials which would be costly and time consuming. Regulatory requirements can vary widely from country to country and could delay or prevent
the introduction of our product candidates in those countries. In addition, approval policies, regulations or the type and amount of clinical
data necessary to gain approval may change during the course of a product candidate’s clinical development and may vary among jurisdictions,
which may cause delays in the approval or the decision not to approve an application. Regulatory authorities have substantial discretion
in the approval process and may refuse to accept any application or may decide that our data are insufficient for approval and require
additional preclinical, clinical or other data. Satisfying these and other regulatory requirements is costly, time consuming, uncertain
and subject to unanticipated delays. Our failure to obtain regulatory approval in any country may delay or have negative effects on the
process for regulatory approval in other countries. Even if we eventually complete clinical testing and receive approval of any regulatory
filing for our product candidates, the FDAFDA, EMA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities may approve our product candidates for a
more more
limited indication or a narrower patient population than we originally requested. If we fail to comply with regulatory requirements
in in
international markets or to obtain and maintain required approvals, our target market will be reduced and our ability to realize the
full full
market potential of our product candidates will be harmed.
All but one of our clinical
trials to date have been conducted outside the United States, and the FDAFDA, EMA and other foreign regulatory authorities may not accept
data data
from such trials.
The acceptance of study
data from
clinical trials conducted outside the United States by the FDA may be subject to certain conditions or may not be accepted at
all. In
cases where data from foreign clinical trials are intended to serve as the sole basis for regulatory approval in the United States,
the the
FDA will generally not approve the application on the basis of foreign data alone unless (i) the data are applicable to the United
States States
population and United States medical practice; (ii) the trials were performed by clinical investigators of recognized competence
and pursuant
to good clinical practice regulations; and (iii) the data may be considered valid without the need for an on-site inspection
by the FDA,
or if the FDA considers such inspection to be necessary, the FDA is able to validate the data through an on-site inspection
or other appropriate
means. Many foreign regulatory bodies have similar approval requirements. In addition, such foreign trials would
be subject to the applicable
local laws of the foreign jurisdictions where the trials are conducted. There can be no assurance that the
FDA, FDAEMA or any other foreign regulatory
authority will accept data from trials conducted outside
of the United States or the applicable jurisdiction. If the FDAFDA, EMA or any comparable
foreign regulatory
authority does not accept such data, it would result in the need for additional trials, which would be costly and time-consuming
and delay
aspects of our business plan, and which may result in our product candidates not receiving approval or clearance for commercialization
in the applicable jurisdiction.
Under FDA policies, a compound is eligible for priority review, or review within a six-month time frame from the time a complete NDA is accepted for filing, if the compound provides a significant improvement compared to marketed drugs in the treatment, diagnosis or prevention of a disease. The FDA determines whether a drug qualifies for Priority Review after an NDA for such drug is submitted to the FDA. Therefore, until NDAs are submitted for our compounds, we cannot be assured that they will be granted Priority Review. Additionally, even if Priority Review is granted for one of our compounds, the FDA does not always meet its six-month Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) goal date for Priority Review and the review process is often extended by FDA requests for additional information or clarification.
In addition, if the FDA, EMA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority approves one or more of our compounds, the manufacturing processes, labeling, packaging, distribution, adverse event reporting, storage, advertising, promotion, import, export and recordkeeping for the approved drug will be subject to additional and potentially extensive ongoing regulatory requirements. These requirements include submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and reports, establishment registration, as well as continued compliance with cGMPs and GCP requirements for any clinical trials that we conduct post-approval. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with our products, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with our third-party manufacturers or manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in, among other things:
If any of our compounds are approved, our product labeling, advertising and promotion will also be subject to regulatory requirements and ongoing regulatory review. The FDA strictly regulates the promotional claims that may be made about drug products. In particular, a drug may not be promoted for uses that are not approved by the FDA as reflected in the drug’s approved labeling. If we receive marketing approval for a compound, physicians may nevertheless lawfully prescribe it to their patients in a manner that is inconsistent with the approved label. While the FDA recently clarified that mere knowledge that a physician is prescribing an approved drug for off-label use is not sufficient to constitute unlawful off-label promotion, if we are found to have actively promoted such off-label uses, we may become subject to significant liability under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA). The federal government has levied large civil and criminal fines against companies for alleged improper promotion and has enjoined several companies from engaging in off-label promotion. Additionally, promotion for off-label uses could result in significant liability under the False Claims Act. The FDA has also requested that companies enter into consent decrees or permanent injunctions under which specified promotional conduct is changed or curtailed.
WeWhile we have established relationships with leading scientists and research
institutions, we will need to continue to establish relationshipsthese with leading
scientists and research institutions.relationships. We believe that such relationships are pivotal to establishing
products using our technologies as
a standard of care for various indications. Additionally, although in discussion, there is no assurance
that our current research partners
will continue to work with us or that we will be able to attract additional research partners. If we
are not able to maintain our existing scientific relationships and establish new scientific
relationships to assist in our research and
development, we may not be able to successfully develop our potential drug compounds. If this
happens, our business will be adversely
affected.
We are not aware that we have experienced any material
misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of confidential or personally identifiable information as a result of a cyber-security
breach or other act,act; however, a cyber-security breach or other act and/or disruption to our information technology systems could have
a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations.
In addition, if the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory
authority approves one or more of our compounds, the manufacturing processes, labeling, packaging, distribution, adverse event reporting,
storage, advertising, promotion, import, export and recordkeeping for the approved drug will be subject to additional and potentially
extensive ongoing regulatory requirements. These requirements include submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and reports,
establishment registration, as well as continued compliance with cGMPs and GCP requirements for any clinical trials that we conduct post-approval.
Later discovery of previously unknown problems with our products, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or
with our third-party manufacturers or manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in, among
other things:
If any of our compounds are approved, our product
labeling, advertising and promotion will also be subject to regulatory requirements and ongoing regulatory review. The FDA strictly regulates
the promotional claims that may be made about drug products. In particular, a drug may not be promoted for uses that are not approved
by the FDA as reflected in the drug’s approved labeling. If we receive marketing approval for a compound, physicians may nevertheless
lawfully prescribe it to their patients in a manner that is inconsistent with the approved label. While the FDA recently clarified that
mere knowledge that a physician is prescribing an approved drug for off-label use is not sufficient to constitute unlawful off-label promotion,
if we are found to have actively promoted such off-label uses, we may become subject to significant liability under the FDCA. The federal
government has levied large civil and criminal fines against companies for alleged improper promotion and has enjoined several companies
from engaging in off-label promotion. Additionally, promotion for off-label uses could result in significant liability under the False
Claims Act. The FDA has also requested that companies enter into consent decrees or permanent injunctions under which specified promotional
conduct is changed or curtailed.
Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may
also also
slow the time necessary for new drugs to be reviewed and/or approved by necessary government agencies, which would adversely
affect our
business. For example, over the last several years, the U.S. government has shut down several timestimes, including the
longest government shutdown that began on October 1, 2025 and ended November 13, 2025, and certain regulatory agencies, such
as the
FDA and the SEC, have had to furlough critical FDA, SEC and other government employees and stop critical activities. If a prolonged
government shutdown occurs, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA to timely review and process our regulatory
submissions, submissions,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, future government shutdowns could impact our
ability to access the
public markets and obtain necessary capital in order to properly capitalize and continue our operations.
Our business could be affected by litigation, government investigations and enforcement actions.
We currently operate in a number of jurisdictions in a highly regulated industry and we could be subject to litigation, government investigation and enforcement actions on a variety of matters in the United States or foreign jurisdictions, including, without limitation, intellectual property, regulatory, product liability, environmental, whistleblower, false claims, privacy, anti-kickback, anti-bribery, securities, commercial, employment and other claims and legal proceedings which may arise from conducting our business. In the ordinary course as a public company, the SEC and other U.S. and foreign regulatory and governmental agencies have initiated and may in the future initiate requests, comments and/or investigations regarding legal, regulatory and compliance matters of the Company. We have cooperated, and will in the future cooperate, on any such matters with such regulatory and governmental agencies, and such matters could require us to expend significant time, attention and resources. Any determination that our operations or activities are not in compliance with existing laws or regulations could result in the imposition of fines, civil and criminal penalties, equitable remedies, including disgorgement, injunctive relief and/or other sanctions against us, and remediation of any such findings could have an adverse effect on our business operations.
Legal proceedings, government investigations and enforcement actions can be expensive and time-consuming. An adverse outcome resulting from any such proceedings, investigations or enforcement actions could result in significant damages, awards, fines, penalties, exclusion from the federal healthcare programs, healthcare debarment, injunctive relief, product recalls, reputational damage and modifications of our business practices, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Even if such a proceeding, investigation or enforcement action is ultimately decided in our favor, the investigation and defense thereof could require substantial financial and management resources.
Changes in U.S. and international trade policies may adversely impact our business and operating results.
The U.S. government has made statements and taken actions that have led to certain changes and may lead to additional changes to U.S. and international trade policies. For example, President Trump has imposed or signaled to impose a series of tariffs on certain products manufactured outside the United States, including pharmaceutical products and raw materials and components for pharmaceutical products, and it is unknown whether and to what extent additional tariffs (or other new laws or regulations) will be adopted, or the effect that any such actions would have on us or our industry. Such unfavorable government policies on international trade, such as export controls, capital controls or tariffs, may affect the import and export of materials and products used in our drug development. For example, we have already faced increased costs associated with our imports of drug products due to newly imposed tariffs on Canada. These policies may also affect the demand for our product candidates, the competitive position of our product candidates, and clinical manufacturing and future commercial activities. If any new tariffs, export controls, legislation and/or regulations are implemented, or if existing trade agreements are renegotiated or if the U.S. government takes retaliatory trade actions due to the ongoing trade tensions, such changes could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Additionally, although the Company believes that it has complied with all the relevant conditions of eligibility under the program for all periods claimed, the ATO has the right to review the Company’s qualifying programs and related expenditures for a period of four years. If such a review were to occur, the ATO may have different interpretations of certain eligibility requirements. If the ATO disagreed with the Company’s assessments and any related subsequent appeals, it could require adjustment to and repayment of current or previous years’ claims already received. Additionally, if the Company was unable to demonstrate a reasonably arguable position taken on such claims, the ATO could also assess penalties and interest on any such adjustments.
WeThe conductedCompany conducts a Section 382 study during the year endedannually
September 30, 2021 and determined that, during the year ended September 30, 2015, there was a change in ownership which resulted in $25.8
million of federal NOLs being subject to an annual limitation. During the year ended September 30, 2021, wehas reduced ourits federal NOLs by
$12.1 million and ourits researchResearch and developmentDevelopment tax credit carryforwards by $0.8 million, which are
the amount of tax assets that will
expire unutilized pursuant to the Section 382 study. This resulted in a reduction of $2.5 million of NOLs and $0.8 million of research
and development credits and a corresponding reduction in the valuation allowance of $3.3 million, which was recorded in the 2021 fiscal
year.382. Subsequent ownership changes in future years could trigger
additional limitations of ourthe Company’s NOLs. During the year ended September 30, 2025, the
2024 and 2023, weCompany determined that there were no changes in ownership pursuant to Section 382.
In the United States, there have been, and continue
to be proposed and enacted legislation at the federal and state levels designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to drug
pricing, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs, reduce the cost of drugs under Medicare, and reform
government program reimbursement methodologies for drugs. For example, in July 2021, the Biden administration released an executive order,
“Promoting Competition in the American Economy,” with multiple provisions aimed at prescription drugs. In response to Biden’s
executive order, on September 9, 2021, HHS released a Comprehensive Plan for Addressing High Drug Prices that outlines principles for
drug pricing reform and sets out a variety of potential legislative policies that Congress could pursue as well as potential administrative
actions HHS can take to advance these principles. In addition, the IRA,Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (“IRA”), among other things,
(1) directs HHS to negotiate the price of
certain single-source drugs and biologics covered under Medicare and (2) imposes rebates under
Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D to
penalize price increases that outpace inflation. These provisions will take effect progressively
starting in fiscal year 2023, although
they may be subject to legal challenges. It is currently unclear how the IRA will be implemented
but is likely to have a significant impact
on the pharmaceutical industry. If any of our products are subject to such negotiation, we
may lose a significant amount of the revenues
expected during the full life cycle of these products. Further,In addition, the Bidencurrent administration
is releasedpursuing other measures to reduce the cost of drugs in the United States. For example, on July 4, 2025, the 2025 Reconciliation Act,
which reduces funding to federal healthcare programs and imposes additional requirements to be eligible for healthcare, was signed into
law. Additionally, in April 2025, an additional executive order onwas October
14, 2022,signed directing the Secretary of HHS to submittake appropriate steps to, among other
things, modify certain provisions of the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program, develop and implement a reportpayment withinmodel 90to daysreduce onthe
price howof high-cost prescription drugs and biological products covered by Medicare, accelerate approval of generic and biosimilar products,
and facilitate the Centerability forof Medicarestates to import pharmaceuticals from other countries, and Medicaidin InnovationMay can2025, bean furtherexecutive leveragedorder was signed, among
other things, directing the Secretary of HHS to propose rules that impose “most-favored-nation” pricing and take other measures
to testreduce newthe modelscost forof loweringprescription drugdrugs. costsIt foris Medicarecurrently unclear whether and Medicaidto beneficiaries.what Weextent expect that additional U.S. federal healthcare
reformthese measures will be adoptedimplemented and what
impact any such implementation would have on our business. Further, there can be no assurance that the current administration or future
administrations will not pursue different or additional measures, such as those intended to more closely align U.S. drug prices with international
drug prices (often referred to as “reference” or “international price index” drug pricing). Future price controls
or other changes in pricing regulation or negative publicity related to the future, anypricing of pharmaceutical drugs could restrict the amount
that we are able to charge for our drug products, which could limit the amounts that the U.S. federal government will pay for healthcare
products and services, which could result in reduced demand forrender our product candidatescandidates, orif approved, commercially unviable and materially
adversely affect our ability to raise additional pricingcapital pressures.on acceptable terms.
A prolonged decline in the price of our common stock
could result in a reduction in our ability to raise capital. Because our operations have been financed through the sale of equity securities,
a decline in the price of our common stock could be especially detrimental to our continued operations. Any reduction in our ability to
raise equity capital in the future would force us to reallocate funds from other planned uses and would have a significant negative effect
on our business plans and operations, including our ability to develop new products and continue our current operations. If our stock
price declines, there can be no assurance that we can raise additional capital or generate funds from operations sufficient to meet our
obligations. We believe the following factors could cause the market price of our common stock to continue to fluctuate widely and could
cause our common stock to trade at a price below the price at which you purchase your shares of common stock:
Securities of certain companies have experienced significant
and extreme volatility in stock price due to short sellers of shares of common stock, known as a “short squeeze.” These short
squeezes have caused extreme volatility in those companies and in the market and have led to the price per share of those companies to
trade at a significantly inflated rate that is disconnected from the underlying value of the company. Many investors who have purchased
shares in those companies at an inflated rate face the risk of losing a significant portion of their original investment as the price
per share has declined steadily as interest in those stocks havehas abated. There can be no assurance that we will not in the future be a
target of a short squeeze, and you may lose a significant portion or all of your investment if you purchase our shares at a rate that
is significantly disconnected from our underlying value.
If we fail to maintain an effective system of
internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud. As a result,
stockholders could lose confidence in our financial and other public reporting, which would harm our business and the trading price of
our common stock.
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
our management is required to report upon the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We cannot assure you that
there will not be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting in the future. Any
failure to maintain internal control over financial reporting could severely inhibit our ability to accurately report our financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows. If we are unable to conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or
if our independent registered public accounting firm determines we have a material weakness or significant deficiency in our internal
control over financial reporting, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, the market
price of our common stock could decline, and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the Nasdaq Stock Market, the SEC or
other regulatory authorities. Failure to remedy any material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, or to implement
or maintain other effective control systems required of public companies, could also restrict our future access to the capital markets.
Our disclosure controls and procedures may not
prevent or detect all errors or acts of fraud.
We are subject to the periodic reporting requirements
of the Exchange Act. We designed our disclosure controls and procedures to reasonably assure that information we must disclose in reports
we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, and recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. We believe that any disclosure controls and procedures or internal
controls and procedures, no matter how well-conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives
of the control system are met. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that
breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. For example, our directors or executive officers could inadvertently fail to
disclose a new relationship or arrangement causing us to fail to make a required related party transaction disclosure. Additionally, controls
can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by an unauthorized override of the controls.
Accordingly, because of the inherent limitations in our control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Our success depends in large part on our ability to obtain and maintain protection of our intellectual property, particularly patents, in the United States and other countries with respect to our product candidates and technology. We seek to protect our proprietary position by filing patent applications in the United States and abroad related to our product candidates and/or by in-licensing intellectual property. U.S. patents related to ANAVEX®2-73 are directed to ANAVEX®2-73 in its various optical or crystal forms, its therapeutic indications, and dosage forms comprising certain doses of ANAVEX®2-73 combined with another therapeutic agent. We may not be able to obtain broader scope patent protection for ANAVEX®2-73 as a single drug or in other jurisdictions.
The patent position of biotechnology and pharmaceutical
companies generally is highly uncertain, involves complex legal, technological and factual questions and has in recent years been the
subject of much litigation. In addition, the laws of foreign countries may not protect our rights to the same extent as the laws of the
United States, or vice versa. Further, we may not be aware of all third-party intellectual property rights potentially relating to and/or
interfering with our product candidates. Publications of discoveries in the scientific literature often lag behind the actual discoveries,
and patent applications in the United States and other jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after filing or, in some
cases, not at all.all until issuance. Therefore, we cannot know with certainty whether we were the first to make the inventions claimed in
our patents or
pending patent applications, or that we were the first to file for patent protection of such inventions. As a result, the
issuance, scope,
validity, enforceability and/or commercial value of our patent rights are highly uncertain. Our pending and future patent
applications applications
may not result in patents being issued that protect our product candidates, in whole or in part, or which could effectively
prevent others
from commercializing competitive product candidates. Even if our patent applications issue as patents, they may not issue
in a form that
will provide us with any meaningful protection, prevent competitors from competing with us or otherwise provide us with
any competitive
advantage. Our competitors may be able to circumvent our patents by developing similar or alternative product candidates
in a non-infringing
manner.
In addition, thewhile issuanceU.S. ofpatents have a patentpresumption
of is not conclusive
as to its inventorship, scope, validity and/or enforceability, andvalidity, our patents may be challenged in the courts or patent offices in the
United States and abroad. Such challenges may result
in loss of exclusivity or freedom to operate or in patent claims being narrowed,
invalidated or held unenforceable, in whole or in part,
which could limit our ability to stop others from using or commercializing similar
or identical product candidates, or limit the duration
of the patent protection of our product candidates. Given the amount of time required
for the development, testing and regulatory review
of new product candidates, patents protecting such candidates might expire before or
shortly after such candidates are commercialized.
As a result, our patent portfolio may not provide us with sufficient rights to exclude
others from commercializing drugs similar or identical
to ours.
We hold ownership or exclusive rights to twenty-twothirty (30)
U.S. patents, twenty-threeseventeen (17) pending U.S. patent applications, and variousnumerous PCT orand ex-U.S. patents and patent applications relating to
our drug candidates, methods
associated therewith, and to our research programs. Neither patents nor patent applications necessarily ensure
the protection of our intellectual
property for a number of reasons, including the following:
It is also unclear whether our trade secrets are adequately
protected. While we use reasonable efforts to protect our trade
secrets, our employees or consultants may unintentionally or willfully
disclose our information to competitors. Enforcing a claim that
someone illegally obtained and is using our trade secrets, like patent
litigation, is expensive and time consuming, and the outcome is
unpredictable. In addition, courts outside the United States are sometimes
less willing to protect trade secrets. Our competitors may
independently develop equivalent knowledge, methods and know-how.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Comparison of fiscal year 2025 to fiscal years 2024”
New heading “Sales Agreement”
Removed heading “Comparison of year ended September 30, 2024 to year ended September 30, 2023”
Removed heading “Controlled Equity Offering Sales Agreement”
Largest changes
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this report. Past operating results are not necessarily indicative of results that may occur in future periods. This discussion contains forward-looking statements, which involve a number of risks and uncertainties. See “Forward Looking Statements” included elsewhere in this report. For discussion and analysis pertaining to 2024 overview and highlights as compared to 2023, please refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on December 23, 2024.see in full comparison
“Comparison of year ended September 30, 2024 to year ended September 30, 2023”see in full comparison
General and administrative expenses weresee in full comparison$11.0$13.8 million for the fiscal20242025 financial year, as compared to$12.0$11.0 million in fiscal2023.2024. The primary reason for thedecreaseincrease in general and administrative expenses wasaanreductionincrease inshare-basedlegalcompensation chargesfees of$1.9$1.7 million,asrelated to legal/regulatory matters, aresultnewofshelftheregistrationvesting of previous option awardsstatement, and varioustheclassextendedactiontimeline of milestone based vesting awards.lawsuits.
“Upon delivery of a placement notice based on our instructions and subject to the terms and conditions of the Sales Agreement, the Sales Agent may sell shares of common stock by methods deemed to be an “at the market offering”, in negotiated transactions at market prices prevailing at the time of sale or at prices related to such prevailing market prices, or by any other method permitted by law, including negotiated transactions, subject to our prior written consent. We are not obligated to make any sales of shares under the Sales Agreement. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (34)
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this report. Past operating results are not necessarily indicative of results that may occur in future periods. This discussion contains forward-looking statements, which involve a number of risks and uncertainties. See “Forward Looking Statements” included elsewhere in this report. For discussion and analysis pertaining to 2024 overview and highlights as compared to 2023, please refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on December 23, 2024.
We are in
the developmentpre-revenue stage and have not earned any revenues since our inception in 2004. We do not anticipate earning any revenues until we
can establish an alliance with other companies to develop, co-develop, license, acquire or market our products.
Comparison of fiscal year 2025 to fiscal years 2024
Comparison of year ended September 30, 2024 to year ended
September 30, 2023
Our operating expenses for fiscal 20242025 decreased to $52.9$51.4 million,
from $55.8$52.9 million in fiscal 2023.2024. The decrease is attributable to a modest decrease in research and development expenses of $1.9 million
(4.3%) to $41.8 million in fiscal 2024 as well as a small decrease in general and administrative expenses of $1.0 million (8.3%) to $11.0
million in fiscal 2024,expenses, as more fully described below.
During fiscal 2024, we experienced an overall decrease
in total research and development expenses over the comparable fiscal 2023 financial year.
The decreases were largely due to:
These decreases were largely offset by the following
increases in research and development expenditures over the comparable fiscal 2023 financial year:
The following table summarizes our research and development expenses for the years ended September 30, 2025, 2024, and 2023 (in thousands):
During fiscal 2025, we experienced an overall decrease in total research and development expenses over the comparable fiscal 2024 financial year. The main factors driving this decrease were as follows:
The above decreases were partially offset by an increase of approximately $3.0 million related to completion of Part B of the ANAVEX®3-71-SZ-001 trial during fiscal 2025, which was substantially larger in size than the preceding Part A during fiscal 2024.
General and administrative expenses were $11.0$13.8 million
for the fiscal 20242025 financial year, as compared to $12.0$11.0 million in fiscal 2023.2024. The primary reason for the decreaseincrease in general and administrative
expenses was aan reductionincrease in share-basedlegal compensation chargesfees of $1.9$1.7 million, asrelated to legal/regulatory matters, a resultnew ofshelf theregistration vesting of previous option awardsstatement, and various
theclass extendedaction timeline of milestone based vesting awards.lawsuits.
We expect to see our research and development expenditures increase from current levels as we continue to advance our pipeline compounds.
We
expect to see our research and development expenditures increase from current levels as we advance our clinical programs, including continuation
of ANAVEX®3-71 trial in Schizophrenia and subsequent advancements, planned advancement of ANAVEX®2-73 for
Parkinson’s disease, planned initiation of an ANAVEX®2-73
for a Fragile X clinical trial, and as we continue to grow our staffing to manage and support these clinical initiatives.
Net other income for the year ended September 30, 20242025 was $9.9$5.0
million as compared to $8.3$9.9 million for fiscal 2023.2024. The primary reason for the increasedecrease in other income was due to a one-time financing
chargedecrease of $0.9 $2.6
million recognized in the comparable year associated with entering into the 2023 Purchase Agreement (as described below),
as well as an increase in interest income as a result of withdrawals in fiscalprincipal 2024balance earned on cash and cash equivalents, dueapplied to anexcess increasefunds invested in a money market as well
as a market wide decrease in interest
rates year over year.rates.
During
fiscal 2024,2025, we recorded $2.3$0.6 million in research and development incentive
income, consisting of the Australian research and development
incentive credit administered through the ATO, in connection with fiscal 2024
2025 eligible expenditures. In comparison, research and development
incentive income for fiscal 20232024 was $2.7$2.3 million in connection with
fiscal 20232024 eligible expenditures. This income is driven by the clinical
trial expenditures incurred in Australia, and the decrease year
over year is a result of the completion of theeligible EXCELLENCER&D trialclinical trials in Rett Syndrome and
the Phase 2b/3 clinical trial in Alzheimer’s disease, as well as
related open label extension trials, which were completed during fiscal 2024.Australia. We expect to continue to receive support from
the Australian
government for future clinical trials which we plan to conduct, in part, within Australia.
Following is a summary of sources of cash flows for the years ended September 30, 2025, 2024 and 2023 (in thousands):
There was an increase in cash used in operating activities of
$3.0$8.2 million during fiscal 2024.2025. The principal reason for this is andue to a large decrease in accounts payable during the year, as compared
to a large increase in net cash expenses, after taking into account non-cash
share-based compensation, over the comparable periodfinancial year, principally due to timing of approximatelypayments $3.3for million.a large manufacturing campaign of ANAVEX®2-73.
Cash provided by financing activities in fiscal 2025 was $9.4 million, comprised primarily of net cash received of $9.2 million related to the issuance of common shares pursuant to the at-the-market offering and $2.9 million in cash from the exercise of stock options by our employees. We utilized $2.7 million to satisfy tax withholding obligations associated with the net exercise of two expiring employee stock options to our CEO, in exchange for the withholding of shares.
Cash provided by financing activities in fiscal 2024 was $12.0
million, comprised of $11.3 attributable to cash received from the issuance of common shares at various market prices under the 2023 Purchase
Agreement (as defined below) and $0.7 million received pursuant to the exercise of stock options.
Sales Agreement
On July 25, 2025, we entered into a Sales Agreement (the “Sales Agreement”) with TD Securities (USA) LLC (the “Sales Agent”). Pursuant to the Sales Agreement, the Company may offer and sell up to an aggregate offering price of $150 million (the “Offering”) in shares of common stock from time to time through the Sales Agent.
Upon delivery of a placement notice based on our instructions and subject to the terms and conditions of the Sales Agreement, the Sales Agent may sell shares of common stock by methods deemed to be an “at the market offering”, in negotiated transactions at market prices prevailing at the time of sale or at prices related to such prevailing market prices, or by any other method permitted by law, including negotiated transactions, subject to our prior written consent. We are not obligated to make any sales of shares under the Sales Agreement. We or the Sales Agent may suspend or terminate the Offering upon notice to the other party, subject to certain conditions. The Sales Agent will act as sales agent on a commercially reasonable efforts basis consistent with its normal trading and sales practices, applicable state and federal law, rules and regulations and the rules of Nasdaq.
We have agreed to pay the Sales Agent commissions for its services of up to 3.0% of the gross proceeds from the sale of shares of Common Stock pursuant to the Sales Agreement. We have also agreed to provide the Sales Agent with customary indemnification and contribution rights.
During the year ended September 30, 2025, the Company issued an aggregate of 927,910 shares of Common Stock under the Sales Agreement for net proceeds of $9.2 million, after deducting commissions and offering expenses.
At September 30, 2025, there was an unused amount of $140.4 million under the Sales Agreement.
On February 3, 2023, the Companywe entered into a $150,000,000
purchase agreement (the “2023 Purchase Agreement”) with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (“Lincoln Park”), pursuant
to which thewe Company hashave the right to sell and issue to Lincoln Park, and Lincoln Park is obligated to purchase, up to $150.0 million
in value
of itsour shares of Common Stock from time to time over a three-year period until February 3, 2026.
On any business day and subject to having an effective
registration statement and subject to certain customary
conditions, the Companywe may direct Lincoln Park to purchase up to 200,000 shares of Common
Stock (such purchases, “Regular Purchases”).
The amount of a Regular Purchase may increase under certain circumstances based
on the market price of the Common Stock; provided, however,
that Lincoln Park’s committed obligation under any Regular Purchase
shall not exceed $4.0 million. The purchase price of shares
of Common Stock will be based on the then prevailing market prices of such
shares at the time of sales as described in the 2023 Purchase
Agreement. There are no limits on the price per share that Lincoln Park
may pay to purchase Common Stock under the 2023 Purchase Agreement.
In addition, if thewe Company hashave directed Lincoln Park to purchase the full
amount of Common Stock available as a Regular Purchase on a
given day, itwe may direct Lincoln Park to purchase additional amounts as “accelerated
purchases” and “additional accelerated
purchases,” each as set forth in the 2023 Purchase Agreement.
During the year ended September 30, 2025, the Company
did not issue any shares of common stock under the 2023 Purchase Agreement. During the year ended September 30, 2024, the Company issued
issued to Lincoln Park an aggregate of 2,455,646 shares of Common Stock under the 2023 Purchase Agreement, including 2,450,000 shares
of Common
Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $11.3 million and 5,646 commitment shares. During the year ended September 30, 2023,
the Company issued to Lincoln Park an aggregate of 3,288,943 shares of Common Stock under the 2023 Purchase Agreement, including 3,275,000
shares of Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $27.9 million and 13,943 commitment shares as well as the 75,000 initial commitment
shares.
On September 30, 2024,2025, there was an unused amount
of $110.8 million
remained available under the 2023 Purchase Agreement. The Company will need to file a prospectus supplement in order to access funds under
the 2023 Purchase Agreement.
Controlled Equity Offering Sales Agreement
On May 1, 2020, we entered into an Amended and Restated
Sales Agreement (the “2020 Sales Agreement”) with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. and SVB Leerink LLC (the “Sales Agents”),
pursuant to which we could offer and sell shares of Common Stock registered under an effective registration statement from time to time
through the Sales Agents (the “At-the-Market Offering”).
No shares were sold during the years ended September
30, 2024 and 2023 under the 2020 Sales Agreement. The Company terminated the 2020 Sales Agreement on July 24, 2024.
We have granted share purchase option awards that vest upon
achievement of certain performance criteria, or milestone-based awards. We estimate an implicit service period for achieving performance
criteria for each award and recognizesrecognize the resulting fair value as expense over the implicit service period when we conclude that achieving
the performance criteria is probable. We periodically review and update as appropriate our estimates of implicit service periods and conclusions
on achieving the performance criteria. Performance awards vest upon achievement of the performance criteria.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
Largest changes
Due to the circumstances described in our Form 12b-25 filed with the SEC on August 10, 2026 (the “Q3 Form 12b-25”), this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q was delinquent and, due to the circumstances described in our Form 12b-25 filed with the SEC on May 11, 2026 (the “Q2 Form 12b-25”),see in full comparisonthis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q was delinquent, and due to the circumstances described in our Form 12b-25 filed with the SEC on August 10, 2026 (the “Q3 Form 12b-25”),our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period endedJuneMarch30,31, 2026, was delinquent. Additionally, as previously disclosed, on May 20, 2026, we received a deficiency notification letter from the Nasdaq Staff indicating that, as a result of our inability to timely filethisthe Quarterly Report on Form10-Q,10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2026, we are not in compliance with Nasdaq Listing RuleRule5250(c)(1).
As further described in Part II, Item 4 “Controls and Procedures” of this Quarterly Report on Formsee in full comparison10-Q10-Q, and Item 9A of the 2025 Form 10-K/A, management has concluded that there was a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting that existed at September 30, 2025, December 31,2025 and2025, March 31, 2026 and June 30, 2026. Accordingly,Accordingly,our internal control over financial reporting as of such dates was not effective. In addition, our disclosure controls and proceduresprocedureswere not effective as of suchdatesdates, due to the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (7)
The termination of our former CEO’s employment
for Cause, the related review by the Special Committee,Committee and other matters reviewed in connection therewith,therewith have resulted in, and could
continue to result in litigation, inquiries, investigations or other proceedings ,proceedings, and could adversely affect our reputation, business,
business, financial condition and results of operations, prospects, and the market price of our common stock.
The
conduct of our former CEO and other matters reviewed
in connection therewith have resulted
in, and could continue to result inin, litigation, inquiries, investigations or enforcement
actions actions
by the FDA, the SEC, Nasdaq or other governmental or regulatory authorities, significant
costs, diversion of management’s attention,
reputational harm and a loss of confidence
among investors, clinical investigators, patients, business partners, shareholders and other
stakeholders. Any of these consequences could materially and adversely affect our reputation,
business, financial condition, results of
operations, prospects and the market price of our
common stock. For example, in June 2026, our former CEO filed a Demand for Arbitration
with
the AAA against us asserting wrongful termination and in July 2026 our former CEO filed a
Summons with Notice with the New York Supreme
Court against four of our independent directors
for alleging “breach of fiduciary duty as independent board members”. For
additional
information, see Part II, Item 1 “Legal Proceedings” of this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q.
As further described in Part II, Item 4 “Controls and Procedures”
of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q10-Q, and Item 9A of the 2025 Form 10-K/A, management has concluded that there was a material weakness
in our internal control over financial reporting that existed at September 30, 2025, December 31, 2025 and2025, March 31, 2026 and June 30, 2026.
Accordingly, Accordingly,
our internal control over financial reporting as of such dates was not effective. In addition, our disclosure controls and
procedures procedures
were not effective as of such datesdates, due to the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting.
We face risks related to previously being delinquent
in filing this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended JuneMarch 30,31, 2026.
Due to the circumstances
described in our Form 12b-25 filed with the SEC on August 10, 2026 (the “Q3 Form 12b-25”), this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
was delinquent and, due to the circumstances described in our Form 12b-25 filed with the SEC on May 11, 2026 (the “Q2 Form 12b-25”), this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
was delinquent, and due to the circumstances described in our Form 12b-25 filed with the SEC on August 10, 2026 (the “Q3 Form 12b-25”),
our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended JuneMarch 30,31, 2026, was delinquent. Additionally, as previously disclosed,
on May 20, 2026, we received a deficiency notification letter from the Nasdaq Staff indicating that, as a result of our inability
to timely
file thisthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q,10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2026, we are not in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule
Rule 5250(c)(1).
The un-timely filing of this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q and our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended JuneMarch 30,31, 2026 will make us ineligible
to utilize our effective Form S-3 registration
statement or to file a new Form S-3 registration statement after we file our next Annual
Report on Form 10-K. We will be unable to regain
eligibility to use Form S-3 until we have timely filed all reports specified under General
Instruction I.A.3. of Form S-3 for the preceding
12 calendar months, which will adversely affect our ability to raise future capital.
As a result of the un-timely filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended JuneMarch 30,31, 2026 with the SEC, we will be ineligible to utilize our
effective Form S-3 registration statement, including in connection with our ATM program under the 2025 Sales Agreement, or to file a new
Form S-3 registration statement after we file our next Annual Report on Form 10-K. We will be unable to regain eligibility to use Form
S-3 until we have timely filed all reports specified under Form S-3 for the preceding 12 calendar months. Should we wish to offer and
sell our securities to the public prior to the time we become eligible to use Form S-3, both the transaction costs and the amount of time
required to complete such transactions could increase, making it more difficult to execute any such transactions successfully and potentially
having a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Net income (loss)”
New heading “Comparison of the nine months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”
Removed heading “Comparison of the six months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025”
Removed heading “2023 Purchase Agreement”
Largest changes
“Net other income for the six months ended March 31, 2026 was $2.3 million, as compared to $2.8 million for the six months ended March 31, 2025. The decrease is primarily related to a decrease in interest income of $0.5 million as a result of lower interest rates.”see in full comparison
“General and administrative expenses were $(2.0) million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to $4.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease was primarily related to the reversal of $7.5 million in stock-based compensation expense during the period. Of the total, $6.9 million was associated with the termination of employees, primarily our former CEO and $0.6 million was associated with the determination that previously granted milestone-based stock options, will never vest. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (51)
In March 2026, we submitted an Investigational New
Drug (“IND”) application to the FDA for ANAVEX 2-73 for the treatment of early AD (the “AD IND”). The submission
included cross-referenced information from an existing IND for Rett syndrome that we submitted to the FDA in October 2017 (the “Rett
IND”). We are currently proceeding with nonclinical and two foundational clinical pharmacology studies under the AD IND to support
and strengthen our regulatory strategy for ANAVEX 2-73 – an absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (“ADME”)
study and a drug-drug interaction (“DDI”) study. The first participant visit in the ADME study occurred in August 2026. Dosing
in the DDI study is underway and the last participant completing dosing is targeted for the end of September 2026. These studies are not
sequential requirements. Rather, these studies support the overall FDA regulatory requirements for ANAVEX 2-73 while we continue to advance
our early AD program in parallel. Such studies are not indication-specific and would apply across all of our ANAVEX2-73ANAVEX 2-73 programs.
We hold ownership or exclusive rights to thirty-three (33) issued U.S. patents, seventeen (17) pending U.S. patent applications, and numerous Patent Cooperation Treaty (“PCT”) and ex-U.S. patents and patent applications relating to our drug candidates, methods associated therewith, and to our research programs.
We expect the filing of this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q, and our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended JuneMarch 30,31, 20262026, to cure the deficiency. However, the Nasdaq
Staff will consider multiple
factors when reviewing our Compliance Plan, including our past compliance history, the reasons for the late
filing, other corporate events
that may occur within our review period, our overall financial condition and our public disclosures. If
the Compliance Plan is not accepted
by the Nasdaq Staff, the Company will have an opportunity to request a hearing on the Nasdaq Staff’s
determination before an independent
Hearings Panel.
Our operating costs consist primarily of research
and development activities including the cost of clinical trials and clinical supplies as well as clinical drug manufacturing and formulation.
Research and development expenses also include personnel-related costs such as salaries and wages, and third-party contract research organization
(“CRO”) expenses in support of these clinical trials. Personnel costs include salaries and wages, benefits, and non-cash share-based
compensation compensation
charges associated with options and other equity awards granted to employees and consultants who are directly engaged in
support of our
research and development activities.
General and administrative expenses consist of personnel
costs, expenses for outside professional services and expenses associated with operating as a public company. Personnel costs consist
of salaries and wages, benefits and share-based compensation for general and administrative personnel. Outside professional services and
public company expenses include expenses related to compliance and reporting, additional insurance expenses, audit and Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 compliance, expenses associated with patent research, applications and filings, investor and shareholder relations activities
and other administrative expenses and professional services. SubsequentWe tohave the end of the quarterly period ended March 31, 2026, we
incurred increased legal and other professional expenses arising
out of the review by the special committee (“Special Committee”)
of our Board of Directors (“Board”), which resulted
in the termination of our former CEO, and related matters, and we anticipate
incurring higher legal and other professional expenses in
future quarters in connection with these matters.
Comparison of the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026
2026 and 2025
Total operating expenses for the three months ended
MarchJune 31,30, 2026 were $6.5$(6.7) million, compared to $12.5$14.5 million for the comparable three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The primary reason for
the decrease in operating expenses is due to the decreasereversal of $15.5 million in researchstock-based andcompensation developmentexpense expenses,primarily whichassociated iswith
the moretermination fullyof describedour below.former CEO for Cause. Additionally, there were also reversals of $1.9 million in stock-based compensation expense
associated with the determination that previously granted milestone-based stock options, will never vest given the Company’s change
in strategy.
General and administrative expenses were $(2.0) million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to $4.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease was primarily related to the reversal of $7.5 million in stock-based compensation expense during the period. Of the total, $6.9 million was associated with the termination of employees, primarily our former CEO and $0.6 million was associated with the determination that previously granted milestone-based stock options, will never vest. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in legal and other professional expenses of approximately $2.2 million arising out of the review by the Special Committee, which resulted in the termination of our former CEO, and related matters.
Our research and development expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2026 were $(4.7) million, as compared to $10.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease was primarily related to the reversal of $9.9 million in stock-based compensation expense during the period. Of the total, $8.6 million was associated with the termination of employees, primarily our former CEO, and $1.3 million was associated with the determination that previously granted milestone-based stock options will never vest.
General and administrative expenses were $2.3 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2026 as compared to $2.6 million for the same quarter of fiscal 2025. The decrease was primarily
related to a decrease in legal and professional fees of approximately $0.4 million.
Our research and development expenses for the three
months ended March 31, 2026 were $4.2 million as compared to $9.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025.
The following table summarizes our research and development
expenses for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
During the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025,
external service provider costs by indication and product candidate were as follows (in thousands):
This was partially offset by an increase in spending on clinical pharmacology studies of $1.1 million, primarily for a DDI study, which commenced in the third quarter of fiscal 2026, and manufacturing of drug product for our planned ADME study, which is expected to start in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026.
Net other income for the three months ended MarchJune 30,
31, 2026 was $1.1 million, as compared to $1.3$1.2 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The decrease is primarily related to
a decrease
in interestresearch and development incentive income of $0.2$0.1 million as a result of lowerthe interestcompletion ratesof duringclinical trial activities in Australia that
had been eligible for the period.Australian research and development credit.
Net income (loss)
Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2026 was $7.8 million, or $0.08 per share, as compared to a net loss of $13.2 million, or $0.16 per share, in the three months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease in net loss is primarily related to the recovery of stock-based compensation expense, as more fully described above.
Comparison of the nine months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025
Total operating expenses for the nine months ended June 30, 2026 were $6.5 million, compared to $40.6 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2025. The primary reason for the decrease in operating expenses is due to the reversal of $16.4 million in stock-based compensation expense primarily associated with the termination of our former CEO and other personnel. Additionally, there were also reversals of $1.9 million in stock-based compensation expense associated with the determination that previously granted milestone-based stock options will never vest given the Company’s change in strategy.
General and administrative expenses were $2.4 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to $10.3 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease was primarily related to the reversal of $7.5 million in stock-based compensation expense during the period. Of the total, $6.9 million was associated with the termination of employees, primarily our former CEO, and $0.6 million was associated with the determination that previously granted milestone-based stock options will never vest. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in legal and professional fees of approximately $1.5 million arising out of the review by the Special Committee, which resulted in the termination of our former CEO, and related matters.
Our research and development expenses for the nine months ended June 30, 2026 were $4.1 million, as compared to $30.3 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease was primarily related to the reversal of $10.8 million in stock-based compensation expense during the period. Of the total, $9.5 million was associated with the termination of employees, primarily our former CEO, and $1.3 million was associated with the determination that previously granted milestone-based stock options will never vest.
The following table summarizes our research and development expenses for the nine months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
During the nine months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, external service provider costs by product candidate were as follows (in thousands):
The decrease in research and development expenses during the nine-month period is primarily related to the following:
Net other income for the nine months ended June 30, 2026 was $3.4 million, as compared to $4.0 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease is primarily related to a decrease in research and development incentive income of $0.5 million as a result of the completion of clinical trial activities in Australia that had been eligible for the Australian research and development credit.
Net loss for the threenine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026,2026 was
was $5.3$3.2 million, or $0.06$0.03 per share, as compared to $11.2$36.6 million, or $0.13$0.43 per share, for the threenine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The decrease
decreasein net loss is primarily related to athe decreaserecovery inof researchstock-based andcompensation development expenses,expense, as more fully described above.
Comparison of the six months ended March 31, 2026
and 2025
Total operating expenses for the six months ended
March 31, 2026 were $13.3 million, compared to $26.1 million for the six months ended March 31, 2025. The primary reason for the decrease
in operating expenses is due to the decrease in research and development expenses, which is more fully described below.
General and administrative expenses were $4.4 million
for the six months ended March 31, 2026, as compared to $5.8 million for the same period of fiscal 2025. The decrease was primarily related
to a decrease in legal and professional fees of approximately $0.7 million, as well as a decrease in stock-based compensation expense
of $0.4 million as a result of the vesting of previously issued milestone options, and due to the forfeiture of options by a deceased
director, as well as $0.1 million related to a reduction in accrued cash bonus compensation for existing staff.
Our research and development expenses for the six
months ended March 31, 2026 were $8.8 million, as compared to $20.3 million for the six months ended March 31, 2025.
The following table summarizes our research and development
expenses for the six months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
During the six months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025,
external service provider costs by product candidate were as follows (in thousands):
The decrease in research and development expenses
during the six-month period is primarily related to the following:
Net other income for the six months ended March 31,
2026 was $2.3 million, as compared to $2.8 million for the six months ended March 31, 2025. The decrease is primarily related to a decrease
in interest income of $0.5 million as a result of lower interest rates.
Net loss
Net loss for the six months ended March 31, 2026,
was $11.0 million, or $0.12 per share, as compared to $23.3 million, or $0.27 per share for the six months ended March 31, 2025. The decrease
is primarily related to a decrease in research and development expenses, as more fully described above.
On MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had net current assets of $121.7$112.4
million, an increase of approximately $26.8$17.5 million from our fiscal year ended September 30, 2025. The increase in net current assets
is primarily related to cash received from the issuance of our common stock pursuant to the 2025 Sales Agreement (as defined below). during
the first quarter of fiscal 2026.
We had cash and cash equivalents of $127.4$118.3 million
as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $131.7$102.6 million as of DecemberSeptember 31,30, 2025. We expect our cash balance at the end of the secondthird quarter of
of 2026 to fund operations and planned development activities until mid to late fiscal 2028.
The following
table summarizes cash flows during the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
Net cash used in operating activities for the sixnine
months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $11.6$20.7 million, compared to $18.0$30.4 million during the comparable period ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The principal
reason for this change is due to the decrease in net loss due to the decrease in operatingresearch and development expenditures, net of stock-based
compensation reversals, as more fully described above.
Cash flows provided by financing activities for the
sixnine month periodmonths ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026,2026 was $36.4 million, compared to $1.6cash utilized in financing activities of $0.6 million during the comparable
nine six-month periodmonths ended March
31,June 30, 2025.
During the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, cash provided
by financing activities was related to cash received from the issuance of our common stock pursuant to the 2025 Sales Agreement.
During the nine months ended June 30, 2025, we received $1.7 million in cash from the exercise of stock options by our employees. We utilized $2.3 million to satisfy tax withholding obligations associated with the net exercise of an employee stock option by our former CEO, in exchange for the withholding of shares of our common stock that would have been received upon exercise of the employee stock option.
During the six months ended March 31, 2025, cash provided
by financing activities was primarily attributable to cash received from the exercise of stock options by our employees.
There were no cash flows from investing activities
for the six-monthnine-month periods ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025.
During the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we issued
an aggregate of 6,026,237 shares of Common Stock under the 2025 Sales Agreement for net proceeds of $37.2$36.4 million, after deducting commissions.
We suspended sales under the 2025 Sales Agreement following the formation of the Special Committee described above under “—Financial
Overview.” We will be unable to make sales under the 2025 Sales Agreement after we file our next Annual Report on Form 10-K due
to our loss of Form S-3 eligibility for the untimely filing of our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2026
and June 30, 2026 with the SEC. We will be unable to regain eligibility to use Form S-3 until we have timely filed all reports specified
under Form S-3 for the preceding 12 calendar months.
At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, there was an unused amount of $103.2
million under the 2025 Sales Agreement.
2023 Purchase Agreement
On February 3, 2023, we entered into a $150,000,000
purchase agreement (the “2023 Purchase Agreement”) with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (“Lincoln Park”), pursuant
to which we had the right to sell and issue to Lincoln Park, and Lincoln Park was obligated to purchase, up to $150.0 million in value
of shares of our Common Stock from time to time over a three-year period.
In consideration for entering into the 2023 Purchase
Agreement, we issued to Lincoln Park 75,000 shares of Common Stock as a commitment fee during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2023
and agreed to issue up to 75,000 shares of Common Stock pro rata, when and if, Lincoln Park purchased, at the our discretion, the $150.0
million aggregate commitment.
During the six-month period ended March 31, 2026 and
2025, we did not issue any shares of Common Stock under the 2023 Purchase Agreement. The 2023 Purchase Agreement expired on February 3,
2026.
AVXL insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
No Form 4 stock transactions in this period.
Well-known investors holding AVXL (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 3,046,538 | $7.9M | 0.01% | Reduced 6% |
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 963,014 | $2.5M | 0.0% | Added 27% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 329,115 | $852.4K | 0.0% | Reduced 41% |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 276,800 | $849.8K | — | Sold out |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 157,486 | $407.9K | 0.0% | New position |
| D. E. Shaw & Co. | 2026-06-30 | 115,462 | $299.0K | 0.0% | Added 157% |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 60,483 | $156.7K | 0.0% | New position |