BCAB 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
BioAtla, Inc. · OTC · Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances) · CIK 1826892 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “The Share Consolidation may not be sufficient to regain or maintain compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement, and the re-pricing mechanism contained in our outstanding warrants may substantially limit the proceeds we receive from the exercise of such warrants following the Share Consolidation.”
New heading “If we decide to seek Orphan Drug Designation for some of our product candidates, we may be unsuccessful or may be unable to maintain the benefits associated with Orphan Drug Designation, including the potential for orphan drug exclusivity.”
New heading “Risks related to the formal process to explore and evaluate strategic options”
New heading “We have initiated a formal process to explore and evaluate strategic options, and there is no guarantee that this strategic path will be successful.”
New heading “If we are unable to successfully complete a strategic transaction, we may be forced to cease operations altogether or file for bankruptcy protection.”
New heading “We may not realize any additional value in a strategic transaction.”
New heading “If we are successful in completing a strategic transaction, we may be exposed to other operational and financial risks.”
New heading “We may not fully realize the expected cost savings and/or operating efficiencies from our restructuring activities and our ability to consummate a strategic transaction depends on our ability to retain our employees required to consummate such transaction.”
New heading “Transactions that we have previously entered into may be re-evaluated or restructured as part of the strategic process, and there can be no assurance that clinical development of our programs will not be limited or delayed as a result of the strategic process.”
Removed heading “We may not realize the anticipated benefits of our workforce reductions, and our restructuring may adversely affect our business.”
Largest changes
“We do some business with companies in China, and it is possible some of our contractual counterparties could be impacted by the legislation targeting China. One particular executive order titled Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe, and Secure American Bioeconomy signed on September 12, 2022 will likely impact the pharmaceutical industry to encourage U.S. domestic manufacturing of pharmaceutical products. …”see in full comparison
“We may not realize the anticipated benefits of our workforce reductions, and our restructuring may adversely affect our business.”see in full comparison
“If we are unable to successfully complete a strategic transaction, we may be forced to cease operations altogether or file for bankruptcy protection.”see in full comparison
“Furthermore, changes in laws or policies governing the terms of trade, and in particular increased trade restrictions, tariffs or taxes on imports from countries where we manufacture products, such as China, could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results. …”see in full comparison
“We may not fully realize the expected cost savings and/or operating efficiencies from our restructuring activities and our ability to consummate a strategic transaction depends on our ability to retain our employees required to consummate such transaction.”see in full comparison
“Existing free trade laws and regulations, such as the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, provide certain beneficial duties and tariffs for qualifying imports and exports, subject to compliance with the applicable classification and other requirements. Changes in laws or policies governing the terms of trade, and in particular increased trade restrictions, tariffs or taxes on imports from countries where we manufacture products, such as China, could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results. For example, in February 2025, the U.S. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (149)
Interim,Preliminary, toplinepreplanned interim and preliminarytopline data from our clinical trials that we announce or publish from time to time may change as more patient data become available and are subject to audit and verification procedures that could result in material changes in the final data.
We are currently not in compliance with Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements. If we are unable to comply with Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements, our common stock could be delisted.
We may seek Fast trackTrack designation granted for ozuriftamab vedotin in recurrentone or metastatic squamous cell carcinomamore of theour headproduct andcandidates neckbut (SCCHN)we might not receive such designation and, even if granted, forsuch any of our other product candidates by the FDAdesignation may not lead to a faster development or regulatory review or approval process and does not increase the likelihood that our product candidates will receive regulatory approval.
There is substantial uncertainty regarding the new Administration’s initiatives and how these might impact the FDA, including its implementation of laws, regulations, policies and guidance and its personnel. Similar initiatives may also be directed toward other government agencies. These initiatives could prevent, limit or delay development and regulatory review and approval of our product candidates, which would negatively impact our business.
We have initiated a formal process to explore and evaluate strategic options, and there is no guarantee that this strategic path will be successful.
If we are unable to successfully complete a strategic transaction, we may be forced to cease operations altogether or file for bankruptcy protection.
We may not realize the anticipated benefits of our workforce reductions, and our restructuring may adversely affect our business.
We are a Phase 2 clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company with a limited operating history upon which you can evaluate our business and prospects. We have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales. Since the commencement of our operations, we have focused substantially all of our resources on conducting research and development activities, including drug discovery, preclinical studies and clinical trials of our product candidates, including the ongoing Phase 2 clinical trials of mecbotamab vedotin (BA3011), ozuriftamab vedotin (BA3021), evalstotug (BA3071), and the ongoing Phase 1 clinical trial of BA3182 (CAB-EpCAM x CAB-CD3), establishing and maintaining our intellectual property portfolio, manufacturing clinical and research material through third parties, hiring personnel, establishing product development and commercialization collaborations with third parties, raising capital,capital and providing general and administrative support for these operations. We have not yet demonstrated our ability to successfully obtain marketing approvals, manufacture a commercial-scale product or arrange for a third party to do so on our behalf or conduct sales and marketing activities necessary for successful product commercialization. As a result, it may be more difficult for you to assess our future viability than it could be if we had a longer operating history.
We have incurred significant losses to date. Our ability to generate product revenue sufficient to achieve profitability will depend on the successful development and eventual commercialization of one or more of our current and future product candidates. Our net losses were $69.8$59.6 million and $123.5$69.8 million for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $486.0$545.6 million. These losses have resulted primarily from costs incurred in connection with research and development activities and general and administrative costs associated with our operations. We do not expect to generate meaningful revenue from product sales for the foreseeable future, and we expect to continue to incur significant operating expenses for the foreseeable future due to the cost of research and development, including identifying and designing product candidates and conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials, and the regulatory approval process for our product candidates. In the near term, we expect that these expenses will begin to decrease as we complete enrollment for certain clinical trials, however, these expenses, and the potential for losses, may generally increase as we progress our lead product candidates through the regulatory approval process. We also expect that our expenses will vary as a result of macroeconomic factors, including inflation. For example, recently, several of our vendors have passed along price increases they have experienced in their own business as a result of inflation.
The development of biopharmaceutical products, including conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials, is a very time-consuming, expensive and uncertain process that takes years to complete. Our operations have consumed substantial amounts of cash since inception, and we will continue to incur significant expenses in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we conduct clinical trials of, and seek marketing approval for,for mecbotamab vedotin, ozuriftamab vedotin, evalstotug, and BA3182. Even if one or more of the product candidates that we develop is approved for commercial sale, we anticipate incurring significant costs associated with sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution activities. Our expenses could increase beyond expectations if we are required by the FDA, the EMA or other comparable foreign regulatory agenciesauthorities to perform clinical trials or preclinical studies in addition to those that we currently anticipate. Other unanticipated costs may also arise. Because the design and outcome of our planned and anticipated clinical trials are highly uncertain, we cannot reasonably estimate the actual amount of resources and funding that will be necessary to successfully complete the development and commercialization of any product candidate we develop. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funding in order to continue our operations.
Advancing the development of our product candidates will require a significant amount of capital. Our existing cash and cash equivalents mayare not be sufficient to fund any of our product candidates through regulatory approval. Because the length of time and activities associated with successful research and development of any individual product candidate are highly uncertain, we are unable to estimate the actual funds we will require for development, marketing approval and commercialization activities. The timing and amount of our operating expenditures will depend largely on:
the timing and progress of our ongoing and planned clinical trials for mecbotamab vedotin, ozuriftamab vedotin, evalstotug, and BA3182;
the timing and amount of milestone payments we may receive under our collaboration agreements;
the cost and timing of regulatory approvals; and our efforts to enhance operational systems and hireattract additionaland retain personnel, including personnel to support development of our product candidates and satisfy our obligations as a public company.
We are exploring and evaluating strategic options to maximize shareholder value, including the sale of preclinical and clinical assets, licensing transactions, strategic partnerships or other corporate transactions. We may be forced to wind-down our operations if we are unable to consummate a strategic transaction and/or obtain sufficient funding.
We have incurred significant operating losses to date and expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future as we continue the development of our CAB technology platform and our CAB product candidates. Our recurring losses from operations raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern for the 12 months from the date that our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report are issued. As a result, our independent public accounting firm included an explanatory paragraph regarding the same in its report on this Annual Report. Our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20242025 do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had approximately $49.0$7.1 million in cash and cash equivalents. Based upon our current operating plan and assumptions, we estimate that our cash and cash equivalents will enable us tonot fund our operations intopast the first half of 2026. Our estimate as to how long we expect our existing cash and cash equivalents to be able to continue to fund our operations is based on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could use our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect. Changing circumstances, some of which may be beyond our control, could cause us to consume capital significantly faster than we currently anticipate, and we may need to seek additional funds sooner than planned.
product-related side effects experienced by participants in clinical trials or by individuals using therapeutic biologics that share characteristics with our product candidates;
inability to obtain alternative sources of supply for which we have a single source for product candidate components or materials, if necessary;
unfavorable FDA or other regulatory agencyauthority inspection and review of a clinical trial site;
delays and changes in regulatory requirements, policy and guidelines, including the imposition of additional regulatory oversight around clinical testing generally or with respect to our technology or product candidates in particular; or varying interpretations of data by the FDA and similarcomparable foreign regulatory agencies,authorities, including the EMA.
Moreover, success in clinical trials in a particular indication does not guarantee that a product candidate will be successful for the treatment of other indications. Many companies in the biopharmaceutical industry have suffered significant setbacks in late-stage clinical trials after achieving encouraging or positive results in early-stage development. We cannot assure you that we will not face similar setbacks in our ongoing or planned clinical trials or in any subsequent or post-marketing confirmatory clinical trials. Moreover, preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses and many companies that believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in preclinical studies and clinical trials nonetheless failed to obtain FDA, EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authority approval. We cannot guarantee that the FDA will agree with our clinical trial plans, and we cannot assure you that the FDA will agree that the results from our trials will be sufficient to support approval of any of our product candidates. For example, the objective response rates on our primary endpoints may not be sufficient, we may not demonstrate a sufficient duration of response, or there may be limitations with the total sample size of our studies and dose selection strategy. Recently, the FDA has increasingly scrutinized oncology clinical trial results where a substantial portion of the enrollment took place outside the U.S. on the basis that the results from these sites are not applicable to the U.S. population due at least in part to choice of comparator. While we intend to enroll sufficient numbers of U.S. patients to address these concerns, the FDA may disagree and question the applicability of the clinical trial results to the U.S. population. To the extent that the results of the trials are not satisfactory to the FDAFDA, EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities for support of a marketing application, we may be required to expend significant resources, which may not be available to us, to conduct additional trials in support of potential approval of our product candidates. Even if regulatory approval is secured for any of our product candidates, the terms of such approval may limit the scope and use of our product candidate, which may also limit its commercial potential. Furthermore, the approval policies or regulations of the FDA, EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may significantly change in a manner rendering our clinical data insufficient for approval, which may lead to the FDA, EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities delaying, limiting or denying approval of our product candidates.
Furthermore, there have been in the past, and may be in the future, investigator-initiated clinical trials using our investigational products. We do not control the design or administration of these or any other investigator-initiated trials that may be conducted, nor the submission or approval of any IND or foreign equivalent required to conduct any such trials. Any investigator-initiated trials could, depending on the actions of such third parties, jeopardize the validity of the clinical data generated, identify significant concerns with respect to our product candidates that could impact our findings or clinical trials, and adversely affect our ability to obtain marketing approval from the FDAFDA, EMA or othercomparable applicableforeign regulatory authorities. To the extent the results of these or other investigator-initiated trials are inconsistent with, or different from, the results of our ongoing or planned company-sponsored trials or raise concerns regarding our product candidates, the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority may question the results of the company-sponsored trial, or subject such results to greater scrutiny than it otherwise would. In these circumstances, the FDA or such foreign regulatory authorities may require us to obtain and submit additional clinical data, which could delay clinical development or marketing approval of our product candidates. In addition, while investigator-initiated trials could be useful to inform our own clinical development efforts, there is no guarantee that we will be able to use the data from these trials to form the basis forsupport regulatory approval of our product candidates.
We use our CAB technology platform to develop product candidates for cancer therapies.cancer. Any failures or setbacks involving our CAB technology platform, including adverse events, could have a detrimental impact on all of our product candidates and our research pipeline. For example, we may uncover a previously unknown risk associated with CABs or other issues that may be more problematic than we currently believe, which may prolong the period of observation required for obtaining, necessitate additional clinical testing or result in the failure to obtain, regulatory approval. If our CAB technology is not safe in certain product candidates, we could be required to abandon or redesign all of our current product candidates, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
We arehave usingused our patented technology platform to develop CABs in oncology indications with our lead product candidates mecbotamab vedotin, ozuriftamab vedotin, evalstotug, BA3182, and BA3182,other aspreclinical wellproduct ascandidates. continuingWe may also in the future continue to build our pipeline of CAB product candidates. Our business depends not only on our ability to successfully develop, obtain regulatory approval for, and commercialize the product candidates we currently have in clinical and preclinical development, but to continue to generate new product candidates through our platform. Even if we are successful in continuing to build our pipeline and further progress the clinical development of our current product candidates, any additional product candidates may not be suitable for clinical development, including as a result of harmful side effects, manufacturing issues, limited efficacy or other characteristics that indicate that they are unlikely to be products that will succeed in clinical development, receive marketing approval or achieve market acceptance. If we cannot validate our technology platform by successfully commercializing CAB product candidates, we may not be able to obtain product, licensing or collaboration revenue in future periods, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
We focus our product candidate development on therapeutic CAB antibodies for the treatment of various oncology indications, such as sarcoma, NSCLC, melanoma, colorectal carcinoma, and head and neck cancer among others. Our projections of addressable patient populations that may benefit from treatment with our product candidates are based on our estimates. These estimates, which have been derived from a variety of sources, including scientific literature, surveys of clinics, physician interviews, patient foundations and market research, may prove to be incorrect. Further, new studies may change the estimated incidence or prevalence of these cancers. Additionally, the potentially addressable patient population for our product candidates may not ultimately be amenable to treatment with our product candidates. Our market opportunity may also be limited by future competitor treatments that enter the market. If any of our estimates prove to be inaccurate, the market opportunity for any product candidate that we or our strategic partners develop could be significantly diminished and have an adverse material impact on our business.
limitations or warnings contained in any labeling approved by the FDAFDA, EMA or othercomparable foreign regulatory authority, including the EMAauthorities;
Preliminary, preplanned interim and topline data from our clinical trials that we announce or publish from time to time may change as more patient data become available and/or are subject to audit and verification procedures that could result in material changes in the final data.
In addition, the information we choose to publicly disclose regarding a particular study or clinical trial is typically selected from a more extensive amount of available information. You or others may not agree with what we determine is the material or otherwise appropriate information to include in our disclosure, and any information we determine not to disclose may ultimately be deemed significant with respect to future decisions, conclusions, views, activities or otherwise regarding a particular product candidate or our business. If the preliminary preplanned interim or topline data that we report differ from later, final or actual results, or if others, including regulatory authorities, disagree with the conclusions reached, our ability to obtain approval for, and commercialize,commercialize our product candidates may be harmed, which could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
unforeseen safety issues, including occurrence of treatment emergent adverse events (“TEAEs”), associated with the product candidate that are viewed to outweigh the product candidate’s potential benefits;
We could encounter delays if a clinical trial is suspended or terminated by us, by the IRBs of the institutions in which such trials are being conducted, by a Data Safety Monitoring Board (“DSMB”), for such trial or by the FDA or othercomparable foreign regulatory authorities. Such authorities may impose such a suspension or termination due to several factors, including failure to conduct the clinical trial in accordance with regulatory requirements or our clinical protocols, inspection of the clinical trial operations or trial site by the FDA or othercomparable foreign regulatory authorities resulting in the imposition of a clinical hold, unforeseen safety issues or adverse side effects, failure to demonstrate a benefit from using a drug, changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions or lack of adequate funding to continue the clinical trial. If we experience delays in the completion of, or termination of, any clinical trial of our product candidates, the commercial prospects of our product candidates will be harmed, and our ability to generate product revenues from any of these product candidates will be delayed or lost. In addition, any delays in completing our clinical trials will increase our costs, slow down our product candidate development and approval process and jeopardize our ability to commence product sales and generate revenues. Any of these occurrences may harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects significantly. In addition, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of our product candidates.
Undesirable side effects caused by our product candidates could cause us or regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials and could result in a more restrictive label or the delay or denial of regulatory approval by the FDAFDA, EMA or othercomparable foreign regulatory authorities and potential product liability claims. Such side effects could also affect patient recruitment or the ability of enrolled patients to complete the trial. Many compounds developed in the biopharmaceutical industry that initially showed promise in early-stage testing for treating cancer have later been found to cause side effects that prevented their further development. Any of these occurrences may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
In our clinical trials for our antibody-drug conjugates mecbotamab vedotin and ozuriftamab vedotin, we have observed adverse events such as reversible myelosuppression, transient liver enzyme elevations, pyrexia, or fever, metabolic disturbances and peripheral neuropathy. In our clinical trial for evalstotug, we have observed infusion-related reactions, cytokine release syndrome, and immune-related adverse events. In our clinical trial for BA3182, we have observed reversible non-febrile neutropenia, diarrhea, cytokine release syndrome, and transient liver enzyme and bilirubin elevations. We may also observe undesirable side effects in clinical trials for our other product candidates.
For our current and future clinical trials, we have contracted with and expect to continue to contract with CROs experienced in the assessment and management of toxicities arising during clinical trials. Nonetheless, they may have difficulty observing patients and treating toxicities, which may be more challenging due to personnel changes, shift changes, house staff coverage or related issues. This could lead to more severe or prolonged toxicities or even patient deaths, which could result in us or the FDAFDA, EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities delaying, suspending or terminating one or more of our clinical trials and which could jeopardize regulatory approval.
Further, clinical trials by their nature test product candidates in only samples of the potential patient populations. With a limited number of patients and limited duration of exposure in such trials, rare and severe side effects of our product candidates may not be uncovered until a significantly larger number of patients are exposed to the product candidate. For example, while we believe that mecbotamab vedotin, ozuriftamab vedotin, evalstotug, and evalstotugBA3182 have demonstrated manageable tolerability profiles thus far, we cannot assure you that these and our other product candidates will not cause more severe side effects in a greater proportion of patients.
In addition, mecbotamab vedotin, ozuriftamab vedotin, and evalstotug arehave beingbeen studied in combination with other therapies, which may exacerbate adverse events associated with the therapy. Patients treated with these or our other product candidates may have recently received surgical, radiation or chemotherapy treatments, which can cause side effects or adverse events that are unrelated to our product candidate but may still impact the success of our clinical trials.
we may be required to implement a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (“REMS”) and/or create a Medication Guide outlining the risks of such side effects for distribution to patients, a communication plan for healthcare providers and/or other elements to assure safe use;
Currently,We wehave are evaluatinginvestigated the use of each of mecbotamab vedotin, ozuriftamab vedotin, and evalstotug in combination with an anti-PD-1 antibody. In the future, we may explore the use of these or our other product candidates in combination with other therapies. If we choose to develop a product candidate for use in combination with an approved therapy, we are subject to the risk that the FDA, EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions could revoke approval of, or that safety, efficacy, manufacturing or supply issues could arise with, the therapy used in combination with our product candidate. If the therapies we use in combination with our product candidates are replaced as the standard of care, the FDA, EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions may require us to conduct additional clinical trials. The occurrence of any of these risks could result in our product candidates, if approved, being removed from the market or being less successful commercially.
If use of a companion diagnostic test is determined to be essential for the safe and effective use of any of our product candidates, such as mecbotamab vedotin and ozuriftamab vedotin, then the FDA generally will require approval, authorization, or clearance of that companion diagnostic before or at the same time that the FDA approves our product candidates, if at all. The FDA has generally required in vitro companion diagnostics intended to select the patients who will respond to cancer treatment to obtain a PMA for that diagnostic simultaneously with approval of the therapeutic. The process of obtaining or creating such diagnostic and obtaining a PMA is time-consuming and costly and a delay in diagnostic approval could delay drug approval.
In 2024, CDRH announced that it intended to reclassify most high-risk in vitro diagnostic products from Class III to Class II medical devices and stated that it expected most future companion diagnostics would be regulated as Class II devices. Reclassification would allow companion diagnostic developers to seek marketing authorization through the FDA’s 510(k) or de novo classification pathways rather than the more costly and time-consuming PMA pathway. Since that time, CDRH has taken steps to begin the reclassification process for certain companion diagnostic products, such as in situ hybridization test systems and nucleic acid-based test systems intended for use with a corresponding approved oncology therapeutic product. However, these proposed reclassifications are not yet final and commercializing any such tests requires PMA approval until the reclassification is final. While the 510(k) and de novo submission processes are less burdensome than the PMA process, there is no guarantee that the diagnostics test that would be used with our product candidates will be reclassified or that they would obtain marketing authorization through either process more quickly than through the PMA process.
If use of a companion diagnostic test is determined to be essential for the safe and effective use of any of our product candidates, such as mecbotamab vedotin and ozuriftamab vedotin, then the FDA generally will require approval or clearance of that companion diagnostic before or at the same time that the FDA approves our product candidates, if at all. The FDA has generally required in vitro companion diagnostics intended to select the patients who will respond to cancer treatment to obtain a PMA for that diagnostic simultaneously with approval of the therapeutic. The process of obtaining or creating such diagnostic and obtaining PMA approval is time-consuming and costly and a delay in diagnostic approval could delay drug approval. According to FDA guidance, if the FDA determines that a companion diagnostic device is essential to the safe and effective use of a novel therapeutic product or indication, the FDA generally will not approve the therapeutic product or new therapeutic product indication if the companion diagnostic is not also approvedapproved, authorized, or cleared for that indication. If a satisfactory companion diagnostic is not commercially available, we may be required to create or obtain one that would be subject to regulatory approval requirements. For example, we have in the past explored predictive biomarkers, such as the Tumor Membrane Percent Score (“TmPS”), which measures AXL and ROR2 expression levels on the tumor membrane, to help inform which patients may be most suitable for treatment with mecbotamab vedotin and ozuriftamab vedotin. Currently, patients with negative or only 1% TmPS scores appear to have experienced clinical benefit in our ongoing clinical trials. However, if the AXL and/or ROR2 TmPS scores predict those most likely to experience clinical benefit, we may be required to pursue the further use of a companion diagnostic in our mecbotamab vedotin or ozuriftamab vedotin clinical trials, and the available market for mecbotamab vedotin or ozuriftamab vedotin, both in patient numbers and patient acceptance of the protocol, could be limited. In addition, we expect to rely on third parties for the design, development and manufacture of companion diagnostic tests for any of our product candidates that require such tests.
The development and commercialization of drugs and therapeutic biologics is highly competitive. We compete with a variety of multinational biopharmaceutical companies and specialized biotechnology companies, as well as technology being developed at universities and other research institutions. Our competitors have developed, are developing and will develop product candidates and processes competitive with our product candidates. We believe that a significant number of products are currently under development, and may become commercially available in the future, for the treatment of conditions for which we are developing product candidates. We believe that while our patented CAB technology platform, its associated intellectual property and our scientific and technical know-how give us a competitive advantage in this space, competition from many sources remains. Our success will partially depend on our ability to develop and protect therapeutics that are perceived to be safer and more effective than competing products. Our commercial opportunity and success will be reduced or eliminated if competing products are perceived to be safer, more effective or less expensive than the therapeutics we develop.
Our commercial opportunity could be substantially limited in the event that our competitors develop and commercialize products that are perceived to be more effective, safer, less toxic or more convenient than products we may develop. In geographies that are critical to our commercial success, competitors may also obtain regulatory approvals before us, resulting in our competitors building a strong market position in advance of our products’ entry. Such competitors could also recruit our employees, which could negatively impact our level of expertise and our ability to execute our business plan.
The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (the “BPCIA”), enacted as part of the Affordable Care Act (the “ACA”), which created an abbreviated approval pathway for biological products that are biosimilar to or interchangeable with an FDA-licensed reference biological product. Under the BPCIA, an application for a biosimilar product referencing an exclusivity-protected product may not be submitted to the FDA until four years following the date that the reference product was first licensed by the FDA. In addition, the approval of a biosimilar product referencing an exclusivity-protected biological product may not be made effective by the FDA until 12 years from the date on which the reference product was first licensed. During this 12-year period of exclusivity, another company may still market a competing version of the reference product if the FDA approves a full Biologics License Application (“BLA”) for the competing product containing the sponsor’s own preclinical data and data from adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to demonstrate the safety, purity and potency of their product. The law is complex and is still being interpreted and implemented by the FDA. As a result, its ultimate impact, implementation, and meaning are subject to uncertainty. While it is uncertain when such processes intended to implement BPCIA may be fully adopted by the FDA, any such processes could have an adverse effect on the future commercial prospects for our product candidates.
There is a risk that any product candidates we may develop that are approved by FDA as a biological product under a BLA would not qualify for the 12-year period of exclusivity or that this exclusivity could be shortened due to congressional action or otherwise, potentially creating the opportunity for generic competition sooner than anticipated.
Our common stock is currently listed on The Nasdaq GlobalCapital Market. The Nasdaq GlobalCapital Market has established certain quantitative criteria and qualitative standards that companies must meet to remain listed for trading on this market.
On August 6, 2025, the Listing Qualifications Staff (the “Staff”) of Nasdaq issued a delist determination to the Company, indicating that the Company did not satisfy Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) (the “Minimum Bid Price Requirement”) and Nasdaq Listing Rule 5450(b)(1)(A) (the “Minimum Stockholders’ Equity Requirement”) (or the alternative standards of $50 million in market value of listed securities (“MVLS”) or $50 million in total assets and $50 million in total revenue). The Company requested a hearing (the “Hearing”) before the Nasdaq Hearing Panel (the “Panel”), at which the Company presented its plan to evidence compliance with all applicable criteria for continued listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550, including the Minimum Bid Price Requirement and the Minimum Stockholders’ Equity Requirement, the alternatives to which are $35 million in MVLS (the “MVLS Rule”) or $500,000 in net income (and, together, the “Equity/MVLS Rule”). On September 16, 2025, the Panel granted the Company’s request for continued listing (the “Panel Decision”), subject to the Company’s timely submission of an application to transfer its listing to The Nasdaq Capital Market, and the Company’s compliance with the Equity/MVLS Rule and the Minimum Bid Price Requirement by December 31, 2025 and February 2, 2026, respectively.
Beginning September 24, 2025, through the close of business on December 31, 2025 (the deadline for compliance with the Minimum Stockholders’ Equity Requirement as set forth in the Panel Decision), the Company evidenced a minimum $35 million MVLS for 69 consecutive trading days, ranging from a low MVLS of $36.03 million to a high MVLS of $71.73 million. Having evidenced compliance with the MVLS Rule for 57 consecutive business days as of December 18, 2026, on December 19, 2025, the Company requested that Nasdaq issue a determination that the Company had regained compliance with the MVLS Rule as an alternative to the Equity Rule.
On January 13, 2026, Nasdaq denied the Company’s request for a compliance determination given that the Company no longer satisfied the MVLS Rule (or the alternative Equity Rule) as of that date. Nasdaq provided the Company with the opportunity to update its plan to evidence compliance with either the Equity/MVLS Rule, which update the Company submitted on January 20, 2026. Nasdaq notified the Company on January 27, 2026, that the Panel had granted the Company an extension through February 2, 2026 to evidence compliance with all applicable criteria for continued listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market.
On February 6, 2026, the Company received notice that Nasdaq had determined to suspend trading in the Company’s securities effective February 10, 2026 (the “Delist Determination”), based upon (i) the Company’s non-compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement and (ii) the Company’s failure to demonstrate compliance with the Minimum Stockholders’ Equity Requirement, the latter notwithstanding the Company’s prior compliance with the alternative threshold of $35 million in MVLS under the MVLS Rule for 69 consecutive trading days. Immediately upon receipt of the Delist Determination, and in accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5820(b), the Company submitted a request to the Nasdaq Listing and Hearing Review Council (the “Listing Council”) that the Listing Council call for immediate review of the Delist Determination and stay any suspension or delisting action pending completion of the Listing Council’s review. The Company was notified on February 8, 2026 that the Listing Council had determined to call for review the Delist Determination. In rendering its decision, the Listing Council also determined to stay any suspension and delisting action pending the outcome of the Listing Council’s review. Accordingly, the Company’s common stock continues to trade on Nasdaq during the Listing Council review process. The review process is currently ongoing, and it is the Company’s understanding that the review process may take several weeks to a few months to complete.
On February 6, 2025, the Company received written notice (the “Notice”) from the Listing Qualifications Department of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) stating that the Company is not in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) (the “Rule”) because the Company has not maintained a minimum closing bid price of the Company’s common stock of at least $1.00 per share for the last 30 consecutive business days. The Notice has no immediate effect on the listing or trading of the Company’s securities.
The Company has 180 calendar days from the date of the Notice, or until August 5, 2025, to regain compliance. If the Company is not deemed in compliance before the expiration of the 180 day compliance period, it will be afforded an additional 180 day compliance period, provided that the Company transfers to The Nasdaq Capital Market and it meets the applicable market value of publicly held shares requirement for continued listing and all other applicable standards for initial listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market (except for the Rule) based on the Company’s most recent public filings and market information and provides written notice to Nasdaq of its intention to cure this deficiency during the second compliance period.
The Company intends to monitor the bid price of the Company’s listed securities and may, if appropriate, consider available options to regain compliance with the Rule. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to regain compliance with the Rule.
The Company can provide no assurance that the Listing Council’s review will result in the continued listing of the Company’s common stock on Nasdaq after the outcome of such review. Any delisting of our common stock could adversely affect the market liquidity of our common stockstock, and the market price of our common stock could decrease. In addition, delisting of our common stock could result in the loss of confidence by investors and adversely affect our ability to raise capital on terms acceptable to us, or at all.all, and would also make it more difficult for our stockholders to sell or purchase our common stock when they wish to do so. If trading in the Company’s common stock is ultimately suspended or delisted from Nasdaq, the Company should be eligible to trade on the OTC Markets system, which may have a material adverse effect on the trading price and volume for the common Stock, and the Company’s stockholders may find it more difficult to sell their shares.
The Share Consolidation may not be sufficient to regain or maintain compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement, and the re-pricing mechanism contained in our outstanding warrants may substantially limit the proceeds we receive from the exercise of such warrants following the Share Consolidation.
The purpose of the Share Consolidation disclosed elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K is to help regain compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement for continued listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market, as well as to increase the trading price of our common stock to enhance overall liquidity of the common stock by attracting new investors. However, once the Share Consolidation is effected, the effect of the Share Consolidation on the market price of our common stock cannot be predicted with any certainty, and we cannot assure you that the Share Consolidation will accomplish these objectives for any meaningful period of time, or at all. While we expect that the reduction in the number of outstanding shares of common stock will proportionally increase the market price of our common stock, we cannot assure you that the Share Consolidation will increase the market price of our common stock by a multiple of the Share Consolidation ratio, or result in any permanent or sustained increase in the market price of our common stock. The market price of our common stock may be affected by other factors which may be unrelated to the number of shares outstanding, including our business and financial performance, general market conditions and prospects for future success.
In addition, the Share Consolidation will effect a reduction in the number of shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of our outstanding warrants exercisable for shares of common stock in proportion to the Share Consolidation ratio. The exercise price of outstanding warrants will increase in proportion to the Share Consolidation ratio. Furthermore, if the lowest volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) of our common stock during the eleven (11) trading days commencing five (5) trading days immediately preceding the Share Consolidation and ending five (5) trading days immediately following the Share Consolidation is less than the warrant’s adjusted exercise price, then the exercise price of the warrant will be reduced to match that lowest VWAP, as adjusted for the Share Consolidation. Because we expect that the re-pricing mechanism will be triggered, our ability to receive significant proceeds from the exercise of the outstanding warrants will be substantially limited.
We have not completed any large-scale or pivotal clinical trials nor managed the regulatory approval process with the FDA or any other comparable foreign regulatory authority. The time required to obtain FDA and other approvals is unpredictable but typically takes many years following the commencement of clinical trials, depending upon the type, complexity and novelty of the product candidate, and numerous other factors including the substantial discretion of regulatory authorities. The standards that the FDA and its foreign counterparts, including the EMA, use when regulating us and our existing or future collaborators require judgment and can change, which makes it difficult to predict with certainty how they will be applied. Any analysis we perform of data from preclinical and clinical activities is subject to confirmation and interpretation by regulatory authorities, which could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. We may also encounter unexpected delays or increased costs due to new government regulations, for example, from future legislation or administrative action, or from changes in FDA policy during the period of product development, clinical trials and FDA regulatory review. It is impossible to predict whether legislative changes will be enacted, or whether FDA or foreign regulations, guidance or interpretations will be changed, or what the impact of such changes, if any, may be. For example, the Oncology Center of Excellence within the FDA has advanced Project Optimus, which is an initiative to reform the dose optimization and dose selection paradigm in oncology drug development to emphasize selection of an optimal dose, which is a dose or doses that maximizes not only the efficacy of a drug but the safety and tolerability as well. This shift from the prior approach, which generally determined the maximum tolerated dose, may require sponsors to spend additional time and resources to further explore a product candidate’s dose-response relationship to facilitate optimum dose selection in a target population. Other Oncology Center of Excellence initiatives have included Project FrontRunner, an initiative with a goal of developing a framework for identifying candidate drugs for initial clinical development in the earlier advanced setting rather than for treatment of patients who have received numerous prior lines of therapies or have exhausted available treatment options, and Project Equity, which is an initiative to ensure that the data submitted to the FDA for approval of oncology medical products adequately reflects the demographic representation of patients for whom the medical products are intended. More recently, as part of the Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act (FDORA), sponsors will be required to submit Diversity Action Plans (DAPs) for Phase 3 studies or other pivotal studies of new drugs. DAPs must include the sponsor’s goals for enrollment for such studies, disaggregated by age group, sex, and racial and ethnic demographic characteristics of clinically relevant study populations; the sponsor’s rationale for such goals; and an explanation of how the sponsor intends to meet such goals. Actions taken in the early days of the new presidential administration have created significant uncertainty as to whether Project Equity will continue and whether the statutory requirements related to DAPs will be implemented by FDA in the near future.options. We are considering these and other policy changes as they relate to our programs.
We are also subject to numerous foreign regulatory requirements governing, among other things, the conduct of clinical trials, manufacturing and marketing authorization, pricing and third-party reimbursement. The foreign regulatory approval process varies among countries and may include all of the risks associated with FDA approval described above as well as risks attributable to the satisfaction of local regulations in foreign jurisdictions. Moreover, the time required to obtain approval may differ from that required to obtain FDA approval. Approval by the FDA does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities outside the United States and vice versa. From time to time during the development and regulatory approval process for our therapeutic candidates, we engage in discussions with the FDA and other regulatory authorities regarding our development programs, including discussions about the regulatory requirements for approval. Sometimes different regulatory authorities provide different or conflicting advice. While we attempt to harmonize the advice we receive from multiple regulatory authorities, it is not always practical to do so. Also, we may choose not to harmonize conflicting advice when harmonization would significantly delay clinical trial data or when we believe it is otherwise inappropriate. In addition, regulatory authorities may change their views on aspects of the clinical programs, including study designs, or the ability of the studies as designed to support approval of a product. If we are unable to effectively and efficiently resolve and comply with the inquiries and requests of the FDA and other regulatory authorities, the approval of our therapeutic candidates may be delayed, and their value may be reduced.
We intend to seek accelerated approval for one or more of our product candidates. Under the accelerated approval program, the FDA may grant accelerated approval to a product candidate designed to treat a serious or life-threatening condition that providesaddresses meaningfulan advantageunmet overmedical available therapiesneed upon a determination that the product candidate has an effect on a surrogate endpoint or intermediate clinical endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit. The FDA considers a clinical benefit to be a positive therapeutic effect that is clinically meaningful in the context of a given disease, such as irreversible morbidity or mortality. For the purposes of accelerated approval, a surrogate endpoint is a marker, such as a laboratory measurement, radiographic image, physical sign, or other measure that is thought to predict clinical benefit but is not itself a measure of clinical benefit. An intermediate clinical endpoint is a clinical endpoint that can be measured earlier than an effect on irreversible morbidity or mortality that is reasonably likely to predict an effect on irreversible morbidity or mortality or other clinical benefit. The accelerated approval pathway may be used in cases in which the advantage of a new drug over available therapy may not be a direct therapeutic advantage but is a clinically important improvement from a patient and public health perspective. We intend to seek accelerated approval for some of our product candidates on the basis of objective response rate, a surrogate endpoint that we believe is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit. For products granted accelerated approval, sponsors are required to verify and describe the product’s clinical benefit generally in the form of confirmatory trials. These confirmatory trials must be completed with due diligence, and the FDA may require that the trial be designed, initiated, and/or fully enrolled prior to approval. If we were to pursue accelerated approval for a product candidate for a disease or condition, we would likely do so on the basis that there is no available therapy for that disease or condition. If any of our competitors were to receive full approval on the basis of a confirmatory trial for a drug for a disease or condition for which we are seeking accelerated approval before we receive accelerated approval, the disease or condition would no longer qualify as one for which there is no available therapy, and accelerated approval of our product candidate would not occur, unless we were able to demonstrate athat meaningfulour advantageproduct overcandidate theaddresses approvedan product.unmet medical need. Many cancer therapies rely on accelerated approval, and the treatment landscape can change quickly as the FDA converts accelerated approvals to full approvals on the basis of successful confirmatory trials. Failure to conduct required post-approval studies, or to confirm a clinical benefit during post-marketing studies, would allow the FDA to withdraw the product from the market on an expedited basis. All promotional materials for product candidates approved under accelerated regulations are subject to prior review by the FDA.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Gain on Warrant Liability”
New heading “Loss on PPAs Liability”
New heading “Gain on warrant liability”
New heading “Loss on PPAs liability”
Removed heading “Collaboration and Other Revenue”
Removed heading “Cash used in investing activities”
Largest changes
Failure to generate sufficient cash flows from operations, raise additional capital, and reduce discretionary spending should additional capital not become available could have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our intended business objectives. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with the development and commercialization of our product candidates, we are unable to estimate the amounts of increased capital outlays and operating expenditures associated with our current and anticipated preclinical studies and clinical trials. To the extent that we raise additional capital through collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our product candidates. We may also have to forego future revenue streams of research programs at an earlier stage of development or on less favorable terms than we would otherwise choose, or have to grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. Our ability to raise additional funds will depend on financial, economic and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. For example, market volatility resulting from a variety of causes, including recent and future government shutdowns, tariffs and trade disputes with other countries, inflation, high interest rates, growing recession risks, supply chain disruptions, and geopolitical tensions and disruptions, including the US and EU sanctions on Russian oil and gas, the ongoing conflict between Russia andsee in full comparisonUkraine andUkraine, the wars between Israel and the terrorist groups Hamas and Hezbollah, the current political situation in Venezuela and escalating conflict and tensions with Iran, could adversely impact our ability to access capital as and when needed. We may choose to raise additional capital through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities due to market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. To the extent we issue additional shares of common stock or other equity or convertible debt securities in the future, there will be further dilution to our investors and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect our stockholders’ rights. If we raise additional capital through debt financing, we may be subject to covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures, acquiring other businesses, products or technology, or declaring dividends. If we are unable to obtain additional funding from these or other sources, it may be necessary to significantly reduce our rate of spending through additional reductions in staff and delay, scale back or stop certain research and development programs.
We have incurred significant losses to date. Our ability to generate product revenue sufficient to achieve profitability will depend on the successful development and eventual commercialization of one or more of our current and future product candidates. Our netsee in full comparisonlosseslosswerewas$69.8$59.6 million and$123.5$69.8 million for the years ended December 31,20242025 and2023,2024, respectively. As of December 31,2024,2025, we had an accumulated deficit of$486.0$545.6 million. These losses have resulted primarily from costs incurred in connection with research and development activities and general and administrative costs associated with our operations. We do not expect to generate meaningful revenue from product sales for the foreseeable future, and we expect to continue to incur significant operating expenses for the foreseeable future due to the cost ofresearch and development, including conductingclinicaltrialsdevelopmentand the regulatory approval process forof our productcandidates,candidates.asDuringwelltheasyearidentifyingended December 31, 2025, we implemented certain initiatives to lower cost anddesigningextendproductourcandidatescash runway, including a restructuring in March 2025 that included a 30% workforce reduction, andconductingapreclinicalreductionstudies.in our lease footprint by almost half in June 2025. We expect our expenses, and the potential for losses, to be variable as we focus development efforts on selected assets and indications. We expect research and development expenses to decrease in the near term as we completeenrollmentour Phase 2 trials for certain indications andtreatmentas a result ofpatientstheinMarchcertain2026ofworkforceourreduction,trials.cost containment measures and capital preservation initiatives discussed above.
“In November 2025, we entered into Pre-Paid Advance Agreements (the “PPAs”) with each of YA II PN, Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempt limited partnership (“Yorkville”), Anson Investments Master Fund LP and Anson East Master Fund LP (collectively, the “Investors”). Pursuant to the PPAs, the Investors agreed to advance to us $7.5 million (the “Pre-Paid Advance”). The Pre-Paid Advance was purchased by the Investors at 95% of the face amount of the Pre-Paid Advance for gross proceeds of approximately $7.13 million. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (46)
You should read the following discussion and analysis together with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. For a complete discussion of forward-looking statements, see the section above entitled “Forward-Looking Statements.” Our actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under the caption “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”
We are a United States-based company with research facilities in San Diego, California and, through our contractual relationship with BioDuro-Sundia, a provider of preclinical development services, in Beijing, China.California. Since the commencement of our operations, we have focused substantially all of our resources on conducting research and development activities, including drug discovery, preclinical studies and clinical trials of our product candidates, including the ongoing Phase 2 clinical trials of mecbotamab vedotin (BA3011), ozuriftamab vedotin (BA3021), evalstotug (BA3071), and our Phase 1 clinical trial of BA3182 (CAB-EpCAM x CAB-CD3), establishing and maintaining our intellectual property portfolio, manufacturing clinical and research material through third parties, hiring personnel, establishing product development and commercialization collaborations with third parties, raising capital and providing general and administrative support for these operations. Since 2014, such research and development activities have exclusively related to the research, development, manufacture and Phase 1 and Phase 2 clinical testing of our CAB antibody-based product candidates and the strengthening of our proprietary CAB technology platform and pipeline.
On March 2, 2026, we announced that our Board of Directors initiated a formal process to explore and evaluate strategic options to maximize shareholder value, including the sale of preclinical and clinical assets, licensing transactions, strategic partnerships or other corporate transactions. There can be no assurance that this process will result in any agreements or transactions. We do not intend to provide updates until our Board of Directors approves a specific action or otherwise determines whether disclosure is appropriate or required.
In connection with the evaluation of strategic options, we also implemented a reduction in force and other cost-containment measures intended to better align resources with our near-term priorities. In order to continue to preserve capital during this period, we are re-evaluating the timing and scope of our clinical development programs, including the appropriate timeline and pacing of additional enrollment in the Phase 1 study of BA3182 (CAB-EpCAM x CAB-CD3) and the timeline to commence a Phase 3 study for ozuriftamab vedotin (BA3021) (CAB-ROR2-ADC) in 2L+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). While we remain focused on conducting the ongoing Phase 1 study and are committed to our clinical development programs, there can be no assurances that clinical development of our programs will not be limited or delayed pending the outcome of the strategic process.
We have incurred significant losses to date. Our ability to generate product revenue sufficient to achieve profitability will depend on the successful development and eventual commercialization of one or more of our current and future product candidates. Our net lossesloss werewas $69.8$59.6 million and $123.5$69.8 million for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $486.0$545.6 million. These losses have resulted primarily from costs incurred in connection with research and development activities and general and administrative costs associated with our operations. We do not expect to generate meaningful revenue from product sales for the foreseeable future, and we expect to continue to incur significant operating expenses for the foreseeable future due to the cost of research and development, including conducting clinical trialsdevelopment and the regulatory approval process forof our product candidates,candidates. asDuring wellthe asyear identifyingended December 31, 2025, we implemented certain initiatives to lower cost and designingextend productour candidatescash runway, including a restructuring in March 2025 that included a 30% workforce reduction, and conductinga preclinicalreduction studies.in our lease footprint by almost half in June 2025. We expect our expenses, and the potential for losses, to be variable as we focus development efforts on selected assets and indications. We expect research and development expenses to decrease in the near term as we complete enrollmentour Phase 2 trials for certain indications and treatmentas a result of patientsthe inMarch certain2026 ofworkforce ourreduction, trials.cost containment measures and capital preservation initiatives discussed above.
Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with product development, we are unable to accurately predict the timing or amount of increased expenses or when, or if, we will be able to achieve profitability. Even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. If we fail to become profitable or are unable to sustain profitability on a continuing basis, then we may be unable to raise capital, maintain our research and development efforts, expand our business or continue our operations at planned levels, and as a result we may be forced to substantially reduce or terminate our operations.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, our cash and cash equivalents totaled approximately $49.0$7.1 million. Accordingly, based on our current operating plan, and along with our history of operating losses, our current cash and cash equivalents mayare not to be sufficient to fund our ongoing operations for a period of at least twelve months from the date the consolidated financial statements included in this report are issued, and these circumstances raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
TheWe Company hashave entered into collaborations and licensing agreements with various third parties that, in some cases, may provide for potential future milestone and royalty payments to us (see Note 79 to our consolidated financial statements). In September 2024, the Companywe licensed BA3362, a Nectin-4 x CD3 T cell engaging bispecific antibody, to Context Therapeutics (“Context”). WeIn recognizedNovember revenue2025, ofwe $11.0received the first $2.0 million duringmilestone payment under the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 related to the licensinglicense agreement with Context.Context (the “Context License Agreement”). In addition, Context is funding supplementary preclinical research performed by us to support their pre-IND process, where Context has publicly indicated that the IND filing will be completed in the second quarter of 2026.
We recognized revenue of $2.0 million and $11.0 million related to the licensing agreement with Context during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
Prior to developing our own programs, we received revenue from services performed under fixed price service contracts that, in some cases, provided for potential milestone and royalty payments to us. We did not recognize any revenue from our legacy service contracts during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
We expect our research and development expenses to decrease in the near term as we complete enrollment and treatment in certain of our Phase 2 clinical trials,trials and focus development on selectedour highPhase potential1 indications.clinical trial of BA3182 (CAB-EpCAM x CAB-CD3) and as a result of the March 2026 workforce reduction, cost containment measures and capital preservation initiatives discussed above. However, research and development could increase upon initiation of new clinical trials, including registrational trials for our lead product candidates. The process of conducting the necessary preclinical and clinical research to obtain regulatory approval is costly and time-consuming. Successful product candidates in later stages of clinical development generally have higher development costs than those in earlier stages of clinical development, primarily due to the increased size and duration of later-stage clinical trials. Accordingly, to the extent that our product candidates continue to advance into clinical trials, including larger and later-stage clinical trials, our expenses will increase substantially and may become more variable. The actual probability of success for our product candidates may be affected by a variety of factors, including the safety and efficacy of our product candidates, the quality and consistency in their manufacture, investment in our clinical programs and competition with other products. As a result of these variables, we are unable to determine the duration and completion costs of our research and development projects and programs or when and to what extent we will generate revenue from the commercialization and sale of our product candidates. We may never succeed in achieving regulatory approval for any of our product candidates.
Gain on Warrant Liability
Gain on warrant liability relates to the changes in the fair value of our liability-classified warrants to purchase common stock.
Loss on PPAs Liability
Loss on PPAs liability relates to the changes in the fair value of our liability-classified PPAs (as defined below).
Other Expense
Other expense consists of miscellaneous income and expense unrelated to our core operations.
Collaboration and Other Revenue
Collaboration and other revenue forwas $2.0 million and $11.0 million during the twelve monthsyears ended December 31, 20242025 wasand $11.02024, millionrespectively, and consisted of revenue recognized under the Context License Agreement. See Note 79 to our consolidated financial statements for further details regarding collaboration and licensing agreements.
Research and development expenses were $63.1$43.6 million and $103.7$63.1 million for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively. The decrease of approximately $40.6$19.5 million was primarily driven by a $16.9$13.1 million decrease in program development costs which was primarily due to a $12.7 million decrease in development costs for certain of our clinical stage programs due to lower enrollment and lower overall expense as we complete Phase 2 clinical trials for mecbotamab vedotin, ozuriftamab vedotin and evalstotug, a $3.1 million decrease in other program expense due to a $1.7 million decrease in related party expense primarily incurred in connection with the Context License Agreement and a $1.4 million decrease in development cost for our pre-clinical programsprograms, primarilyoffset BA3142, our CAB B7H3 x CD3 bispecific program, and BA3361, our CAB Nectin-4 ADC program,by a $13.5$2.8 million decreaseincrease in development costs for our clinicalongoing stagePhase programs1 trial for our EpCAM program. The remaining decrease in research and development expense is due to a $3.9 million decrease in personnel related expense primarily due to completinggoal Phase 2 enrollmentachievement for ourthe ongoingannual ADCemployee trialsincentive bonus falling below the threshold for mecbotamabpayment vedotinin 2025 and ozuriftamablower vedotin,headcount including our March 2025 reduction in force, a $9.6 million decrease in manufacturing costs for evalstotug, a $1.2$2.0 million decrease in stock-based compensation related to awards issued under our 2020 Equity Incentive Plan, a $0.5 million decrease in personnel related expense, and a $0.4$0.5 million decrease in facilities and other allocated expense. This was offset by $1.7 million in related party expense incurred in connection with the licensing agreement with Context Therapeutics in September 2024, which is further discussed in Note 7 and Note 8 to our financial statements.
General and administrative expenses were $21.8$17.7 million and $26.0$21.8 million for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively. The decrease of approximately $4.1 million was primarily driven by a $1.9 million decrease ofin $3.4personnel related expense related expenses primarily due to goal achievement for the annual employee incentive bonus falling below the threshold for payment in 2025 and lower headcount including our March 2025 reduction in force, a $1.5 million decrease in stock-based compensation related to awards issued under our 2020 Equity Incentive Plan, a $0.7$0.3 million decrease in consulting and professional fees related to closing of the Context License Agreement, and a $0.3 million decrease in insurance primarily due to lower D&O insurance premiums, a $0.3 million decrease in personnel related expense, offset by a $0.5 million increase in professional fees, consulting and advisor fees due to 2024 transactions including our licensing agreement with Context Therapeutics in September 2024 and our Registered Direct Offering in December 2024.premiums.
Interest income was $3.4$0.8 million and $6.3$3.4 million for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively. The decrease of $2.9$2.5 million was primarily due to lower cash and cash equivalents compared to the same period in 2023, and lower interest rates during same period.2024.
Gain on warrant liability
Gain on warrant liability was $0.3 million and $0.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The decrease of $0.5 million was due to the change in fair value of the warrants we issued in December 2024.
Loss on PPAs liability
Loss on PPAs liability was $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to zero for the year ended December 31, 2024. The loss of $0.4 million was due to the change in fair value of the PPAs liability in connection with the PPAs (as defined below) entered into in November 2025.
Other expense
Other expense was $1.0 million and $0.01 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The increase in expense of $1.0 million was due to transaction costs related to our PPAs and SEPA (as defined below) entered into in November 2025.
In November 2025, we entered into Pre-Paid Advance Agreements (the “PPAs”) with each of YA II PN, Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempt limited partnership (“Yorkville”), Anson Investments Master Fund LP and Anson East Master Fund LP (collectively, the “Investors”). Pursuant to the PPAs, the Investors agreed to advance to us $7.5 million (the “Pre-Paid Advance”). The Pre-Paid Advance was purchased by the Investors at 95% of the face amount of the Pre-Paid Advance for gross proceeds of approximately $7.13 million. The Pre-Paid Advance may be repaid in cash or, at each Investor’s option and from time to time, converted into shares (the “PPA Shares”) of our common stock. The Pre-Paid Advance will accrue interest at an annual rate of 4%, subject to an increase upon the occurrence and continuance of events of default as described in the PPA. The outstanding balance of the Pre-Paid Advance, plus any accrued and unpaid interest, is due and payable on the 12-month anniversary of the closing date, unless otherwise agreed by the parties. We may, at our option, prepay all or part of the outstanding Pre-Paid Advance, plus a 10% payment premium and any accrued and unpaid interest, by delivering a written notice to the applicable Investor, subject to certain conditions. As of March 2026, the entire balance of the Pre-Paid Advance has been converted into PPA Shares and no amounts remain outstanding under the PPAs.
In November 2025, we also entered into the Standby Equity Purchase Agreement (the “SEPA” and together with the PPAs, the “Agreements”) with Yorkville pursuant to which we have the right to sell to Yorkville up to $15.0 million of shares of common stock (the “Commitment Amount”), subject to certain limitations and conditions set forth in the SEPA, during the 36 months beginning November 20, 2025 (such shares, the “SEPA Shares”). Sales of the SEPA Shares to Yorkville and the timing of any such sales, if elected to be utilized by us at a future date, are at our option, and we are under no obligation to sell any SEPA Shares to Yorkville. As consideration for Yorkville’s commitment to purchase the SEPA Shares, we agreed to pay to Yorkville a commitment fee equal to 2.00% of the Commitment Amount, or $300,000, which was satisfied by the issuance to Yorkville of an aggregate of 243,428 shares of common stock (the “Commitment Shares”) based on the price per share equal to the VWAP of the common stock on the trading day immediately prior to the Effective Date, or $1.2324. As of March 31, 2026, 2,404,635 SEPA Shares had been sold under the SEPA, with gross proceeds to the Company totaling approximately $0.4 million.
In January 2023, the Company entered into an Open Market Sale Agreement (the “Sales Agreement”) with Jefferies LLC (“Jefferies”) acting as sales agent pursuant to which the Company may, from time to time at its sole discretion, sell shares of the Company’s common stock, with aggregate gross sales proceeds of up to $100.0 million. The Company will pay Jefferies a commission of 3.0% of the aggregate gross proceeds the Company receives from all sales of the Company’s common stock under the Sales Agreement. We have not sold any shares of our common stock under the Sales Agreement as of December 31, 2024.
In December 2024, the Companywe closed on an offering (the “December 2024 Offering”) of 9,679,158 shares of common stock at a price of $0.9520 per share with accompanying warrants to purchase up to 9,679,158 shares of common stock, which have an exercise price of $1.19 per share (the “Warrants”). The gross proceeds from the December 2024 Offering were approximately $9.2 million, before deducting $0.7 million of placement agent fees and other offering expenses payable by the Company.us. The accompanying Warrants becomebecame exercisable beginningon sixJune months20, from issuance2025 and will expire five years from the date of initial exercisability. Accordingly, thereThere were 9,679,158 common stock warrantsWarrants outstanding but not yetand exercisable at December 31, 2024.2025.
the timing and outcome of our recently initiated evaluation of strategic options;
Based on our current operating plan, our current cash and cash equivalents mayare not be sufficient to fund our ongoing operations for a period of at least twelve months from the date the consolidated financial statements included in this report are issued. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could utilize our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect. These circumstances raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. While management believes additional funds can be raised through equity or debt financings, strategic collaborations transactions, or a combination of these approaches, which will alleviate the conditions that raise substantial doubt, these plans are not entirely within our control and cannot be assessed as being probable of occurring. We may not be able to secure additional financing in a timely manner or on favorable terms, if at all.
Failure to generate sufficient cash flows from operations, raise additional capital, and reduce discretionary spending should additional capital not become available could have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our intended business objectives. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with the development and commercialization of our product candidates, we are unable to estimate the amounts of increased capital outlays and operating expenditures associated with our current and anticipated preclinical studies and clinical trials. To the extent that we raise additional capital through collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our product candidates. We may also have to forego future revenue streams of research programs at an earlier stage of development or on less favorable terms than we would otherwise choose, or have to grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. Our ability to raise additional funds will depend on financial, economic and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. For example, market volatility resulting from a variety of causes, including recent and future government shutdowns, tariffs and trade disputes with other countries, inflation, high interest rates, growing recession risks, supply chain disruptions, and geopolitical tensions and disruptions, including the US and EU sanctions on Russian oil and gas, the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine andUkraine, the wars between Israel and the terrorist groups Hamas and Hezbollah, the current political situation in Venezuela and escalating conflict and tensions with Iran, could adversely impact our ability to access capital as and when needed. We may choose to raise additional capital through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities due to market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. To the extent we issue additional shares of common stock or other equity or convertible debt securities in the future, there will be further dilution to our investors and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect our stockholders’ rights. If we raise additional capital through debt financing, we may be subject to covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures, acquiring other businesses, products or technology, or declaring dividends. If we are unable to obtain additional funding from these or other sources, it may be necessary to significantly reduce our rate of spending through additional reductions in staff and delay, scale back or stop certain research and development programs.
Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $48.2 million, which consisted of a consolidated net loss of $59.6 million, offset by a net change of $4.3 million in our net operating assets and liabilities, $6.4 million of non-cash transactions and a $0.7 million adjustment to reclassify issuance costs related to the PPAs announced in November 2025 that were expensed as incurred. The net change in our operating assets and liabilities was primarily due to an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $2.8 million, an increase in operating lease right-of-use assets and liabilities of $0.3 million, and a decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets of $1.1 million. The non-cash transactions primarily consisted of $5.4 million of stock-based compensation, $0.4 million related to change in fair value of the PPAs liability, $0.4 million related to depreciation and amortization, $0.3 million related to the commitment fee for the SEPA announced in November 2025, and a $0.2 million loss on disposal of property and equipment, offset by $0.3 million related to the change in fair value of the warrant liability.
Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $104.0 million, which consisted of a net loss of $123.5 million, a net change of $4.7 million in our net operating assets and liabilities and $14.8 million of non-cash transactions. The net change in our operating assets and liabilities was primarily due to an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $5.3 million, partially offset by a decrease in operating lease right-of-use assets and liabilities of $0.6 million. The non-cash transactions primarily consisted of $13.5 million of stock-based compensation and non-cash charges of $1.2 million related to depreciation and amortization.
Cash used in investing activities
Cash used in investing activities was $0 and $0.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, primarily related to the purchase of property and equipment.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $9.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, which consisted primarily of $9.2 million in net proceeds from the issuance of common stock and warrants in connection with the December 2024 offering and common stock issued under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan of $342,000, partially offset by payment of taxes related to the net settlement of equity awards of $46,000.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $77,000$6.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023,2025, which consisted primarily of $7.1 million in net proceeds from the netPPAs and $0.1 million in proceeds from the issuance of common stock under ourthe Employee Stock Purchase Plan of $336,000, partiallyPlan, offset by the payment of taxesfinancing relatedcosts toin connection with the netDecember settlement2024 offering of equity$0.4 awardsmillion ofand $259,000.$0.5 million in connection with the PPAs.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $9.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, which consisted primarily of $9.2 million in net proceeds from the issuance of common stock and warrants in connection with the December 2024 offering and common stock issued under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan of $0.3 million, partially offset by payment of taxes related to the net settlement of equity awards of $46 thousand.
Our management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, as well as the reported revenue generated, and reported expenses incurred during the reporting periods. Our estimates are based on our historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.
While our significant accounting policies are described in the Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we believe that the following critical accounting policies are most important to understanding and evaluating our reported financial results.
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we accrue expenses as of each balance sheet date. This process involves reviewing open contracts and purchase orders, communicating with our personnel to identify services that have been performed on our behalf and estimating the level of service performed and the associated cost incurred for the service when we have not yet been invoiced or otherwise notified of the actual cost. We make estimates of our accrued expenses as of each balance sheet date based on facts and circumstances known to us at that time. The estimates in our accrued research and development expenses include the costs incurred for services performed by our vendors in connection with research and development activities for which we have not yet been invoiced. We periodically confirm the accuracy of our estimates with the service providers and make adjustments if necessary.
See Note 1 to the audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
Largest changes
We do some business with companies in China, and it is possible some of our contractual counterparties could be impacted by the legislation targeting China. One particular executive order titled Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe, and Secure American Bioeconomy signed on September 12, 2022 will likely impact the pharmaceutical industry to encourage U.S. domestic manufacturing of pharmaceutical products. Moreover, there have been Congressional legislative proposals, such as the bill titled the BIOSECURE Act, which was recently signed into law in December 2025, that prohibits U.S. federal agencies from entering into or renewing any contract with any entity that uses biotechnology equipment or services produced or provided by a “biotechnology company of concern” to perform that contract as well as authorize the U.S. government to name additional Chinese “biotechnology companies of concern.”see in full comparisonWhileThepriorBIOSECUREversionsAct also prohibits U.S. government loan and grant recipients from using federal loan or grant money to enter into contracts with entities that use equipment from “biotechnology companies of concern” in the performance of any federal prime contract or subcontract. The Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) of theBIOSECUREU.S.ActGovernmentexplicitlywillnamedissue a list of “biotechnology companies of concern,” which will include certain companies that are identified on therevisedU.S.versionDepartmentdefinesof Defense’s annual List of Chinese Military Companies, also known as the 1260H List, other entities which the U.S. Government has deemed as such pursuant to a separate designation process, and certain subsidiary, parent, and successor entities of the foregoing. We are currently party to agreements with WuXi Biologics and WuXi XDC Hong Kong for certain development and manufacturing services. WuXi AppTec is currently designated on the 1260H List, but neither WuXi Biologics nor WuXi XDC Hong Kong are currently designated on the 1260H List. WuXi Biologics was previously explicitly named as a “biotechnology company of concern”asinanpriorentity that is identified on the annual 1260H List of Chinese military companies (the “1260H List”) issued by the U.S. Department of Defense, any entity designated by the U.S. Government as such, and certain affiliatesversions of theforegoing.BIOSECURE Act.” In addition, the BIOSECURE Act provides a grandfathering period of five years for entities that are designated by the U.S. Government; however, entities identified on the 1260H List are not eligible for such grandfathering period. It is possible for the legislation to be amended. If this law, or similar laws that are passed impact Chinese biotechnology manufacturing companies that may be or may become contractors of ours or provide biotechnology equipment or services in the manufacture of our products or products candidates, we may be restricted in our ability to work with such Chinese biotechnology manufacturing companies to the extent we would contract with, or otherwise receive funding from, the U.S. government. As a result, we may need to seek alternative CMO relationships. While we believe we will be able to identify and contract with such alternative CMOs, we cannot predict the terms of any such alternative arrangement nor what actions may ultimately be taken with respect to trade relations between the United States and China or other countries, what products and services may be subject to such actions or what actions may be taken by China or the other countries in retaliation. In addition, any unfavorable government policies on international trade, such as export controls, capital controls or tariffs, new legislation or regulations, renegotiation of existing trade agreements, or any retaliatory trade actions due to recent or future trade tension, may impede, delay, limit, or increase the cost of manufacturing our product candidates. Such events could result in our clinical or commercial supply, packaging and other services being interrupted or limited, which could harm our business.
“The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (the “BPCIA”), enacted as part of the Affordable Care Act (the “ACA”), created an abbreviated approval pathway for biological products that are biosimilar to or interchangeable with an FDA-licensed reference biological product. Under the BPCIA, an application for a biosimilar product referencing an exclusivity-protected product may not be submitted to the FDA until four years following the date that the reference product was first licensed by the FDA.”see in full comparison
The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (the “BPCIA”), enacted as part of the Affordable Care Act (the “ACA”), created an abbreviated approval pathway for biological products that are biosimilar to or interchangeable with an FDA-licensed reference biological product. Under the BPCIA, an application for a biosimilar product referencing an exclusivity-protected product may not be submitted to the FDA until four years following the date that the reference product was first licensed by the FDA. In addition, the approval of a biosimilar product referencing an exclusivity-protected biological product may not be made effective by the FDA until 12 years from the date on which the reference product was first licensed. During this 12-year period of exclusivity, another company may still market a competing version of the reference product if the FDA approves a full Biologics License Application (“BLA”) for the competing product containing the sponsor’s own preclinical data and data from adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to demonstrate the safety, purity and potency of their product. The law is complex and is still being interpreted and implemented by the FDA. As a result, its ultimate impact, implementation, and meaning are subject to uncertainty. While it is uncertain when such processes intended to implement BPCIA may be fully adopted by the FDA, any such processes could have an adverse effect on the future commercial prospects for our product candidates.see in full comparison
As ofsee in full comparisonMarchJune31,30, 2026, we had approximately$2.0$1.5 million in cash and cash equivalents.We expect a near-term payment from Context of $4.5 million under the Amendment to the Context License Agreement which was entered into on May 14, 2026.Based on our current operating plan, and along with our history of operating losses, our current cash and cash equivalents are not sufficient to fund our ongoing operations for a period of at least twelve months from the date the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report are issued, and these circumstances raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our estimate as to how long we expect our existing cash and cash equivalents to be able to continue to fund our operations is based on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could use our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect. Changing circumstances, some of which may be beyond our control, could cause us to consume capital significantly faster than we currently anticipate, and we may need to seek additional funds sooner than planned.
We have incurred significant losses to date. Our ability to generate product revenue sufficient to achieve profitability will depend on the successful development and eventual commercialization of one or more of our current and future product candidates. Our net losses were $59.6 million and $69.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. For thesee in full comparisonthreesix months endedMarchJune31,30, 2026 and 2025, our net losses were$6.3$5.9 million and$15.3$34.0 million, respectively. As ofMarchJune31,30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of$552.0$551.5 million. These losses have resulted primarily from costs incurred in connection with research and development activities and general and administrative costs associated with our operations. We do not expect to generate meaningful revenue from product sales for the foreseeable future, and we expect to continue to incur significant operating expenses for the foreseeable future due to the cost of research and development, including identifying and designing product candidates and conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials, and the regulatory approval process for our product candidates. In the near term, we expect that these expenses will begin to decrease as we complete certain clinical trials, however, these expenses, and the potential for losses, may generally increase as we progress our lead product candidates through the regulatory approval process. We also expect that our expenses will vary as a result of macroeconomic factors, including inflation. For example, recently, several of our vendors have passed along price increases they have experienced in their own business as a result of inflation.
At the state level, individual states are increasingly aggressive in passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. For example, the FDA released a final rule in September 2020 providing guidance for states to build and submit plans for importing drugs from Canada, and the FDA authorized the first such plan in Florida in January 2024, which has been extended untilsee in full comparisonMayNovember 2026. In June 2026, FDA authorized Colorado’s importation plan. It is unclear whetherthistheseprogramprograms will be extended, howitthey will be implemented, including which drugs will be chosen, and whetheritthey will be subject to legal challenges in the United States or Canada. Other states have also submitted proposals that are pending review by the FDA. In addition, regional healthcare authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical products and which suppliers will be included in their prescription drug and other healthcare programs. This could reduce the ultimate demand for our drug products that we successfully commercialize or put pressure on our product pricing. In addition, regional healthcare authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical products and which suppliers will be included in their prescription drug and other healthcare programs. These measures could reduce the ultimate demand for our products, once approved, or put pressure on our product pricing.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (7)
We have incurred significant losses to date. Our ability to generate product revenue sufficient to achieve profitability will depend on the successful development and eventual commercialization of one or more of our current and future product candidates. Our net losses were $59.6 million and $69.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. For the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, our net losses were $6.3$5.9 million and $15.3$34.0 million, respectively. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $552.0$551.5 million. These losses have resulted primarily from costs incurred in connection with research and development activities and general and administrative costs associated with our operations. We do not expect to generate meaningful revenue from product sales for the foreseeable future, and we expect to continue to incur significant operating expenses for the foreseeable future due to the cost of research and development, including identifying and designing product candidates and conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials, and the regulatory approval process for our product candidates. In the near term, we expect that these expenses will begin to decrease as we complete certain clinical trials, however, these expenses, and the potential for losses, may generally increase as we progress our lead product candidates through the regulatory approval process. We also expect that our expenses will vary as a result of macroeconomic factors, including inflation. For example, recently, several of our vendors have passed along price increases they have experienced in their own business as a result of inflation.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had approximately $2.0$1.5 million in cash and cash equivalents. We expect a near-term payment from Context of $4.5 million under the Amendment to the Context License Agreement which was entered into on May 14, 2026. Based on our current operating plan, and along with our history of operating losses, our current cash and cash equivalents are not sufficient to fund our ongoing operations for a period of at least twelve months from the date the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report are issued, and these circumstances raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our estimate as to how long we expect our existing cash and cash equivalents to be able to continue to fund our operations is based on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could use our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect. Changing circumstances, some of which may be beyond our control, could cause us to consume capital significantly faster than we currently anticipate, and we may need to seek additional funds sooner than planned.
The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (the “BPCIA”), enacted as part of the Affordable Care Act (the “ACA”), created an abbreviated approval pathway for biological products that are biosimilar to or interchangeable with an FDA-licensed reference biological product. Under the BPCIA, an application for a biosimilar product referencing an exclusivity-protected product may not be submitted to the FDA until four years following the date that the reference product was first licensed by the FDA.
The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (the “BPCIA”), enacted as part of the Affordable Care Act (the “ACA”), created an abbreviated approval pathway for biological products that are biosimilar to or interchangeable with an FDA-licensed reference biological product. Under the BPCIA, an application for a biosimilar product referencing an exclusivity-protected product may not be submitted to the FDA until four years following the date that the reference product was first licensed by the FDA. In addition, the approval of a biosimilar product referencing an exclusivity-protected biological product may not be made effective by the FDA until 12 years from the date on which the reference product was first licensed. During this 12-year period of exclusivity, another company may still market a competing version of the reference product if the FDA approves a full Biologics License Application (“BLA”) for the competing product containing the sponsor’s own preclinical data and data from adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to demonstrate the safety, purity and potency of their product. The law is complex and is still being interpreted and implemented by the FDA. As a result, its ultimate impact, implementation, and meaning are subject to uncertainty. While it is uncertain when such processes intended to implement BPCIA may be fully adopted by the FDA, any such processes could have an adverse effect on the future commercial prospects for our product candidates.
At the state level, individual states are increasingly aggressive in passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. For example, the FDA released a final rule in September 2020 providing guidance for states to build and submit plans for importing drugs from Canada, and the FDA authorized the first such plan in Florida in January 2024, which has been extended until MayNovember 2026. In June 2026, FDA authorized Colorado’s importation plan. It is unclear whether thisthese programprograms will be extended, how itthey will be implemented, including which drugs will be chosen, and whether itthey will be subject to legal challenges in the United States or Canada. Other states have also submitted proposals that are pending review by the FDA. In addition, regional healthcare authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical products and which suppliers will be included in their prescription drug and other healthcare programs. This could reduce the ultimate demand for our drug products that we successfully commercialize or put pressure on our product pricing. In addition, regional healthcare authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical products and which suppliers will be included in their prescription drug and other healthcare programs. These measures could reduce the ultimate demand for our products, once approved, or put pressure on our product pricing.
We do some business with companies in China, and it is possible some of our contractual counterparties could be impacted by the legislation targeting China. One particular executive order titled Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe, and Secure American Bioeconomy signed on September 12, 2022 will likely impact the pharmaceutical industry to encourage U.S. domestic manufacturing of pharmaceutical products. Moreover, there have been Congressional legislative proposals, such as the bill titled the BIOSECURE Act, which was recently signed into law in December 2025, that prohibits U.S. federal agencies from entering into or renewing any contract with any entity that uses biotechnology equipment or services produced or provided by a “biotechnology company of concern” to perform that contract as well as authorize the U.S. government to name additional Chinese “biotechnology companies of concern.” WhileThe priorBIOSECURE versionsAct also prohibits U.S. government loan and grant recipients from using federal loan or grant money to enter into contracts with entities that use equipment from “biotechnology companies of concern” in the performance of any federal prime contract or subcontract. The Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) of the BIOSECUREU.S. ActGovernment explicitlywill namedissue a list of “biotechnology companies of concern,” which will include certain companies that are identified on the revisedU.S. versionDepartment definesof Defense’s annual List of Chinese Military Companies, also known as the 1260H List, other entities which the U.S. Government has deemed as such pursuant to a separate designation process, and certain subsidiary, parent, and successor entities of the foregoing. We are currently party to agreements with WuXi Biologics and WuXi XDC Hong Kong for certain development and manufacturing services. WuXi AppTec is currently designated on the 1260H List, but neither WuXi Biologics nor WuXi XDC Hong Kong are currently designated on the 1260H List. WuXi Biologics was previously explicitly named as a “biotechnology company of concern” asin anprior entity that is identified on the annual 1260H List of Chinese military companies (the “1260H List”) issued by the U.S. Department of Defense, any entity designated by the U.S. Government as such, and certain affiliatesversions of the foregoing.BIOSECURE Act.” In addition, the BIOSECURE Act provides a grandfathering period of five years for entities that are designated by the U.S. Government; however, entities identified on the 1260H List are not eligible for such grandfathering period. It is possible for the legislation to be amended. If this law, or similar laws that are passed impact Chinese biotechnology manufacturing companies that may be or may become contractors of ours or provide biotechnology equipment or services in the manufacture of our products or products candidates, we may be restricted in our ability to work with such Chinese biotechnology manufacturing companies to the extent we would contract with, or otherwise receive funding from, the U.S. government. As a result, we may need to seek alternative CMO relationships. While we believe we will be able to identify and contract with such alternative CMOs, we cannot predict the terms of any such alternative arrangement nor what actions may ultimately be taken with respect to trade relations between the United States and China or other countries, what products and services may be subject to such actions or what actions may be taken by China or the other countries in retaliation. In addition, any unfavorable government policies on international trade, such as export controls, capital controls or tariffs, new legislation or regulations, renegotiation of existing trade agreements, or any retaliatory trade actions due to recent or future trade tension, may impede, delay, limit, or increase the cost of manufacturing our product candidates. Such events could result in our clinical or commercial supply, packaging and other services being interrupted or limited, which could harm our business.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, executive officers and directors, together with holders of 5% or more of our outstanding common stock and their respective affiliates, beneficially own approximately 26.6%26.1% of our outstanding common stock. More specifically, Jay M. Short, Ph.D, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, together with his spouse, beneficially own approximately 5.3%,5.4%, of our outstanding common stock, as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Gain (loss) on warrant liability”
New heading “Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”
New heading “Research and development expense”
New heading “General and administrative expense”
Removed heading “Interest income”
Largest changes
“General and administrative expenses were $7.7 million and $10.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The decrease of approximately $2.5 million was primarily driven by a $2.3 million decrease in personnel expense, including stock-based compensation, primarily due to workforce reductions in March 2025 and March 2026, and lower bonus expense in 2026, a $0.5 million decrease in professional fees primarily related to the Company’s intellectual property portfolio, and a $0.4 million decrease in facility and other allocated costs. …”see in full comparison
“Research and development expenses were $7.9 million and $26.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (37)
You should read the following discussion and analysis together with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in “Item 1. Financial Statements” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Quarterly Report”) and the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto as of and for the year ended December 31, 2025 included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, on March 31, 2026, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, filed with the SEC on April 29, 2026 (together, the “Annual Report”). In addition to historical information, this Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including but not limited to those set forth under the caption “Risk Factors” in the Annual Report, and the caption “Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report, as updated by our subsequent filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Furthermore, past operating results are not necessarily indicative of results that may occur in future periods.
We have incurred significant losses to date. Our ability to generate product revenue sufficient to achieve profitability will depend on the successful development and eventual commercialization of one or more of our current and future product candidates. OurWe reported net income of $0.5 million and a net loss wasof $6.3$5.9 million for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $15.3net losses of $18.7 million and $34.0 million for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $552.0$551.5 million. These losses have resulted primarily from costs incurred in connection with research and development activities and general and administrative costs associated with our operations. We do not expect to generate meaningful revenue from product sales for the foreseeable future, and we expect to continue to incur significant operating expenses for the foreseeable future due to the cost of clinical development of our product candidates. During the year ended December 31, 2025, we implemented certain initiatives to lower cost and extend our cash runway, including a restructuring in March 2025 that included a 30% workforce reduction, and a reduction in our lease footprint by almost half in June 2025. Additionally, in March 2026 we implemented a restructuring plan that included a 70% workforce reduction. We expect our expenses to decrease in the near term as a result of the March 2026 workforce reduction, cost containment measures and capital preservation initiatives discussed above.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our cash and cash equivalents totaled approximately $2.0$1.5 million. On May 14, 2026, we entered into a First Amendment (the "Context Amendment") to that certain License Agreement, dated September 23, 2024 (the "Context License Agreement"), by and between us and Context Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Context"). Under the terms of the Context Amendment, and in full consideration for the amended license rights in the Context Amendment, we received $4,500,000 upfront from Context has agreed to pay us: (i) $4,500,000, payable within five (5) business days ofand the effectiveadditional date$2,000,000 ofthat thewas Amendment, and (ii) $2,000,000, payabledue by August 1, 2026.
We have entered into collaborations and licensing agreements with various third parties that, in some cases, may provide for potential future milestone and royalty payments to us (see Note 9 to our condensed consolidated financial statements). In September 2024, we licensed BA3362, a Nectin-4 x CD3 T cell engaging bispecific antibody, to Context. In November 2025, we received the first $2.0 million milestone payment under the Context License Agreement. In addition, Context has funded supplementary preclinical research performed by us to support their pre-IND process, where Context has publicly indicated that it expects to initiate a Phase 1 clinical trial in the third quarter of 2026.
In May 2026, in connection with the Context Amendment, we received $4.5 million. We subsequently received the additional $2.0 million that was due by August 1, 2026. We recognized $6.5 million in revenue during the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, related to these payments under the Context License Agreement. We did not recognize any revenue during the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, related to the Context License Agreement.
We did not recognize any revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, related to the Context License Agreement.
We expect our research and development expenses to decrease in the near term due to completion of our Phase 2 clinical trials and as a result of the March 2026 workforce reduction, cost containment measures and capital preservation initiatives discussed above. However, research and development could increase upon initiation of new clinical trials, including registrational trials for our lead product candidates. The process of conducting the necessary preclinical and clinical research to obtain regulatory approval is costly and time-consuming. Successful product candidates in later stages of clinical development generally have higher development costs than those in earlier stages of clinical development, primarily due to the increased size and duration of later-stage clinical trials. Accordingly, to the extent that our product candidates continue to advance into clinical trials, including larger and later-stage clinical trials, our expenses will increase substantially and may become more variable. The actual probability of success for our product candidates may be affected by a variety of factors, including the safety and efficacy of our product candidates, the quality and consistency in their manufacture, investment in our clinical programs and competition with other products. As a result of these variables, we are unable to determine the duration and completion costs of our research and development projects and programs or when and to what extent we will generate revenue from the commercialization and sale of our product candidates. We may never succeed in achieving regulatory approval for any of our product candidates.
Gain (Loss) on Warrant Liability
Gain (loss) on warrant liability relates to the changes in the fair value of our liability-classified warrants to purchase common stock.
Comparison of the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025
Collaboration and other revenue was $6.5 million and $0.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The $6.5 million increase was due to amounts due under the Context Amendment in the current quarter.
Research and development expenses were $4.6$3.3 million and $12.4$13.7 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The decrease of approximately $7.8$10.3 million was primarily driven by a $6.3$8.8 million decrease in program development costs due to completion of our Phase 2 trials for mecbotamab vedotin, ozuriftamab vedotin, and evalstotug,evalstotug. The remaining decrease in research and development expense is due to a $2.1 million decrease in personnel related expense, including stock-based compensation, primarily due to our reduction in force in March 2026, and a $0.3$0.4 million decrease in facilities and other allocated expense.costs. This was offset by a $0.9$1.0 million increase in developmentrelated costsparty forexpense ourincurred ongoingin Phaseconnection 1with trialthe forContext ourAmendment EpCAMin program.May 2026.
General and administrative expenses were $4.7$2.9 million and $5.3$5.0 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The decrease of approximately $0.5$2.0 million was primarily driven by a $1.2 million decrease in personnel related expense, including stock-based compensation, primarily due to our reduction in force in March 2026, offset by a $0.6$0.8 million increasedecrease in consulting and professional fees which was primarily related to the Company'sCompany’s effortsintellectual property portfolio, offset by a $0.4 million increase in advisor fees related to maintainclosing compliancethe withContext NasdaqAmendment listingin requirements.May 2026. The remaining $0.4 million decrease is related to facility and other allocated costs.
Interest income
Interest income was $0.04$0.0 million and $0.4$0.2 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The decrease of $0.4$0.2 million was primarily due to lower cash and cash equivalents compared to the same period in 2025.
Gain (loss) on warrant liability
Gain on warrant liability was $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to a loss on warrant liability of $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The increase of $0.5 million was due to the change in fair value of the warrants which were issued in December 2024 and are adjusted to fair value at each period, including the impact of an adjustment to the warrant exercise price related to the Share Consolidation which became effective in April 2026.
Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025
Collaboration and other revenue was $6.5 million and $0.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The $6.5 million increase was due to amounts due under the Context Amendment in the current quarter.
Research and development expense
The following table summarizes our research and development expenses allocated by CAB program for the periods indicated:
Research and development expenses were $7.9 million and $26.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The decrease of approximately $18.1 million was primarily driven by a $14.2 million decrease in program development costs due to completion of our Phase 2 trials for mecbotamab vedotin, ozuriftamab vedotin, and evalstotug, a $4.2 million decrease in personnel related expense, including stock-based compensation, primarily due to workforce reductions in March 2025 and March 2026, a lower bonus expense in 2026, and a $0.7 million decrease in facilities and other allocated costs. This was offset by a $1.0 million increase in related party expense incurred in connection with the Context Amendment in May 2026.
General and administrative expense
General and administrative expenses were $7.7 million and $10.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The decrease of approximately $2.5 million was primarily driven by a $2.3 million decrease in personnel expense, including stock-based compensation, primarily due to workforce reductions in March 2025 and March 2026, and lower bonus expense in 2026, a $0.5 million decrease in professional fees primarily related to the Company’s intellectual property portfolio, and a $0.4 million decrease in facility and other allocated costs. This was offset by a $0.4 million increase in advisor fees related to closing the Context Amendment in May 2026, and a $0.3 million increase in fees related to the Company’s efforts to maintain compliance with Nasdaq listing requirements including the share consolidation that became effective in April 2026.
Interest income was $0.1 million and $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The decrease of $0.5 million was primarily due to lower cash and cash equivalents compared to the same period in 2025.
Gain on warrant liability was $2.7$2.9 million and $1.9$1.6 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The increase of $0.8$1.3 million was due to the change in fair value of the warrants which were issued in December 2024 and are adjusted to fair value at each period.period, including the impact of an adjustment to the warrant exercise price related to the share consolidation which became effective in April 2026.
Gain on PPAs liability was $0.3 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to zero for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The gain of $0.3 million was due to the change in fair value for our pre-paid agreement liability which was initiated in November 2025 and has been fully converted into common stock as of March 2026.
We have incurred aggregate net losses and negative cash flows from operations since our inception and anticipate we will continue to incur net losses for the foreseeable future. Since July 2020, we have funded our operations primarily through the issuance of equity. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had cash and cash equivalents of $2.0$1.5 million.
In November 2025, we also entered into the Standby Equity Purchase Agreement (the “SEPA”) with Yorkville pursuant to which we have the right to sell to Yorkville up to $15.0 million of shares of common stock (the “Commitment Amount”), subject to certain limitations and conditions set forth in the SEPA, during the 36 months beginning November 20, 2025 (such shares, the “SEPA Shares”). Sales of the SEPA Shares to Yorkville and the timing of any such sales, if elected to be utilized by us at a future date, are at our option, and we are under no obligation to sell any SEPA Shares to Yorkville. As consideration for Yorkville’s commitment to purchase the SEPA Shares, we agreed to pay to Yorkville a commitment fee equal to 2.00% of the Commitment Amount, or $300,000, which was satisfied by the issuance to Yorkville of an aggregate of 4,868 shares of common stock (the “Commitment Shares”). As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, 48,092 SEPA Shares had been sold under the SEPA, with gross proceeds to the Company totaling approximately $0.4 million.
In December 2024, we closed on an offering (the “December 2024 Offering”) that included warrants to purchase up to 193,581 shares of common stock, which initially had an exercise price of $59.50 per share (the “Warrants”) subject to certain adjustments including for reverse stock splits and share consolidations. As a result of the April 6, 2026 Share Consolidation and pursuant to the re-pricing mechanism contained in the Warrants, the exercise price of the Warrants was adjusted to $4.35 to match the lowest VWAP of our common stock during the eleven (11) trading days commencing five (5) trading days immediately preceding the Share Consolidation and ending five (5) trading days immediately following the Share Consolidation. The Warrants became exercisable on June 20, 2025 and will expire five years from the date of initial exercisability. There were 193,581 Warrants outstanding and exercisable at MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
On May 14, 2026, we entered into the Amendment to the Context License Agreement with Context.Amendment. Under the terms of the Context Amendment, and in full consideration for the amended license rights described below, we received $4.5 million upfront from Context has agreed to pay us: (i) $4,500,000, payable within five (5) business days ofand the effectiveadditional date$2.0 ofmillion thethat Amendment,was and (ii) $2,000,000, payabledue by August 1, 2026 (together, the "Amendment Pay-Off AmountsConsideration"). The Amendment Pay-OffConsideration Amounts satisfysatisfies in full any and all milestone and royalty payment obligations contemplated by the Context License Agreement. Among other modifications to the Context License Agreement, under the terms of the Context Amendment, the license granted to Context under the Context License Agreement is amended to be irrevocable, exclusive, royalty-free, fully paid-up and non-terminable, and any and all diligence obligations with respect to Context are removed.
To the extent that we raise additional capital through collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our product candidates. We may also have to forego future revenue streams of research programs at an earlier stage of development or on less favorable terms than we would otherwise choose, or have to grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. Our ability to raise additional funds will depend on financial, economic and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. For example, market volatility resulting from a variety of causes, including recent and future government shutdowns, tariffs and trade disputes with other countries, inflation, high interest rates, growing recession risks, supply chain disruptions, and geopolitical tensions and disruptions, including the US and EU sanctions on Russian oil and gas, the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the wars between Israel and the terrorist groups Hamas and Hezbollah, thegeopolitical current political situationinstability in Venezuela and escalatingthe conflict and tensions within Iran, could adversely impact our ability to access capital as and when needed. We may choose to raise additional capital through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities due to market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. To the extent we issue additional shares of common stock or other equity or convertible debt securities in the future, there will be further dilution to our investors and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect our stockholders’ rights. If we raise additional capital through debt financing, we may be subject to covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures, acquiring other businesses, products or technology, or declaring dividends. If we are unable to obtain additional funding from these or other sources, it may be necessary to significantly reduce our rate of spending through additional reductions in staff and delay, scale back or stop certain research and development programs.
Net cash used in operating activities for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $5.3$5.7 million, which consisted of a net loss of $6.3$5.9 million, a net change of $2.9$1.7 million in our operating assets and liabilities and $1.9$1.5 million of non-cash transactions. The net change in our operating assets and liabilities was primarily due to an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $3.1$3.4 million andmillion, an increase in operating lease ROU asset and lease liability of $0.1 million, offsetand bya an increasedecrease in prepaid expenses and other assets of $0.2 million, offset by an increase in accounts receivable of $2.0 million. The non-cash transactions primarily consisted of $2.7$2.9 million related to the change in fair value of the warrant liability and $0.3 million related to the change in fair value of the PPAs liability, offset by $1.0$1.6 million of stock-based compensation and non-cash charges of $0.1 million related to depreciation and amortization.
Net cash used in operating activities for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 was $16.3$30.4 million, which consisted of a net loss of $15.3$34.0 million, a net change of $0.9$1.9 million in our operating assets and liabilities and $0.1$1.7 million of non-cash transactions. The net change in our operating assets and liabilities was primarily due to an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $2.1$2.5 million, offset by an increase in prepaid expenses and other assets of $3.0$0.4 million and a net decrease in operating lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities of $0.3 million. The non-cash transactions primarily consisted of $1.6$3.0 million of stock-based compensation and non-cash charges of $0.2$0.3 million related to depreciation and amortization, offset by $1.9$1.6 million related to the change in fair value of the warrant liability.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $0.1 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, consisting primarily of proceeds from issuance of common stock under the SEPA of $0.4 million, offset by the payment of financing costs in connection with the PPAs and SEPA of $0.3 million and the payment of taxes related to the net settlement of restricted stock units of $14 thousand.million.
Net cash used in financing activities was $0.4 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, consisting primarily of the payment of financing costs in connection with the December 2024 offering and the payment of taxes related to the net settlement of restricted stock units.units, partially offset by the proceeds from the issuance of common stock under the ESPP and the 2020 Plan.
Our critical accounting policies are those accounting principles generally accepted in the United States that require us to make subjective estimates and judgments about matters that are uncertain and are likely to have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations, as well as the specific manner in which we apply those principles. For a description of our critical accounting policies, see the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” contained in our Annual Report. There have not been any material changes to the critical accounting policies discussed therein during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
BCAB insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-31 | Sievers Eric |
Shares withheld for tax | 134 | $1.69 | $226 |
| 2026-08-31 | Short Jay M Phd |
Shares withheld for tax | 259 | $1.69 | $438 |
| 2026-08-31 | Vasquez Christian |
Shares withheld for tax | 71 | $1.69 | $120 |
| 2026-05-31 | Short Jay M Phd |
Shares withheld for tax | 259 | $3.93 | $1.0K |
| 2026-05-31 | Vasquez Christian |
Shares withheld for tax | 82 | $3.93 | $322 |
| 2026-05-31 | Sievers Eric |
Shares withheld for tax | 134 | $3.93 | $527 |
| 2026-03-12 | Short Jay M Phd |
Shares withheld for tax | 639 | $0.17 | $109 |
| 2026-03-11 | Vasquez Christian |
Shares withheld for tax | 175 | $0.17 | $30 |
| 2026-03-11 | Sievers Eric |
Shares withheld for tax | 360 | $0.17 | $61 |
Well-known investors holding BCAB (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 2,756,674 | $443.8K | — | Sold out |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 70,616 | $292.4K | 0.0% | New position |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 510,514 | $82.2K | — | Sold out |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 435,675 | $70.1K | — | Sold out |