BCAL 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
California BanCorp \ CA · Nasdaq · National Commercial Banks · CIK 1795815 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Our loan portfolio may be subject to increased concentration and volatility risks due to variability, driven by large relationship-based lending commitments.”
New heading “The development and use of artificial intelligence presents risk and challenges that may adversely impact our business.”
New heading “We may reduce or discontinue the payment of dividends on our common stock.”
Removed heading “We may suffer losses in our loan portfolio despite our underwriting practices.”
Removed heading “Construction and land development loans are based upon estimates of costs and values associated with the completed project. These estimates may be inaccurate, and we may be exposed to significant losses on loans for these projects.”
Removed heading “SBA lending is an important part of our business. Our SBA lending program is dependent upon the U.S. federal government, and we face specific risks associated with originating SBA loans.”
Removed heading “Combining the Company and CALB may be more costly than expected and the anticipated benefits and cost savings of the merger may not be realized.”
Removed heading “KEY PERSONNEL RISKS”
Removed heading “If we are not able to attract, retain and motivate key personnel, our business could be negatively affected.”
Removed heading “Our common stock currently has a limited trading market and is thinly traded, and a more liquid market for our common stock may not develop.”
Largest changes
“At December 31, 2024, our construction and land development loans totaled $222.0 million, or 7.1% of our loans held for investment portfolio, excluding SBA loans. These loans involve additional risks because funds are advanced upon the security of the project, which is of uncertain value prior to its completion, and costs may exceed realizable values in declining real estate markets. …”see in full comparison
see in full comparisonPandemics,Severe weather, natural disasters,global climate change,acts of terrorism, globalconflicts including the Russia-Ukraine War, the Israel-Hamas War,conflicts, or other similar events have in the past, and may in the future have, a negative impact on our business and operations. Our business and most of the collateral securing our loans are concentrated in California, which is prone to earthquakes, fires, mudslides, drought, flooding and other natural disasters, including the January 2025 Los Angeles county wildfires. These events impact us negatively to the extent that they result in reduced capital markets activity, lower asset price levels, destruction of residential and commercial properties, or disruptions in general economic activity in the United States or abroad, or in financial market settlement functions. Disruptions to our clients could result in increased risk of delinquencies, defaults, foreclosures and losses on our loans.
“The trade policies and potential tariff initiatives being pursued by the U.S. government under the administration of President Trump may present risks to our borrowers and the markets within which we operate, particularly with respect to the threatened imposition of additional tariffs on certain products imported from countries such as Mexico, Canada, China, which are significant international trading partners for the California economy. …”see in full comparison
“The development and use of artificial intelligence presents risk and challenges that may adversely impact our business.”see in full comparison
“The SBA’s 7(a) Loan Program is the SBA’s primary program for helping small businesses, with financing guaranteed for a variety of general business purposes. Typically, we sell the guaranteed portion of our SBA 7(a) loans in the secondary market. These sales result in premium income for us at the time of sale and create a stream of future servicing income, as we retain the servicing rights to these loans. For the reasons described above, we may not be able to continue originating these loans or selling them in the secondary market. …”see in full comparison
“Additionally, our business and our customers may be affected by shifts in federal trade policy and judicial interpretations of trade authorities. In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the President does not have authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose broad tariffs without explicit congressional authorization, striking down major tariffs previously in place. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (61)
•We may be adversely affected by the lack of soundness of other financial institutionsinstitutions.
•We face riskrisks related to severe weather, natural disasters, acts of terrorism and global conflicts.
•The appraisals value of the real estate that secures a significant portion of our loan portfolio may not be realizable if we foreclose on such loans.
•We may suffer losses in our loan portfolio despite our underwriting practices.
•Our loan portfolio may be subject to increased concentration and volatility risks due to variability, driven by large relationship-based lending commitments.
•Our construction and land development loans involve additional risks that could results in higher losses.
•In addition to general lending risks, we face particular risks related to our SBA, real estate, commercial real estate, construction, commercial and consumer lending.
•We have a significant number of loans secured by real estate, so we face risks related to a downturn in the real estate market and the impact of changes in interest rates on our real estate loans.
•We rely upon independent appraisals to determine the value of the real estate that secures a significant portion of our loans, and the values indicated by such appraisals may not be realizable if we are forced to foreclose upon such loans.
•The anticipated benefits and cost savings of the Merger may not be realized.
•We rely heavily on our executive management team and other key personnel.
•We operate in a highly regulated environment and the laws and regulations regarding capital requirements, anti-money laundering, information security and many other aspects of our business. Our failure to so comply could adversely affect us and our future growth.
•OurThe development and use of artificial intelligence may result in reputational harm or liability, or could adversely affect our business.
•We may reduce or discontinue the payment of dividends on our common stock.
•Our common stock currently has a limited trading market and is thinly traded, and a more liquid market for our common stock may not develop.
•As an emerging growth company and a smaller reporting company, we may take advantage of reduced regulatory and reporting requirements under the federal securities laws, which may make our common stock less attractive to investors.
The recent failures of some depository institutions have raised concerns among depositors that their deposits may be at risk. While we believe the Bank is operated in a safe and sound manner, a market-wide loss of depositor confidence caused by the failures or the perceived unsoundness of other depository institutions could lead to deposit outflows at the Bank, potentially at levels that could require that we borrow funds or sell securities or other assets to address liquidity concerns, any of which could adversely affect our consolidated operating results, business prospects and capital.
We face risks related to severe weather, natural disasters, global climate change, acts of terrorism and global conflicts.
Pandemics,Severe weather, natural disasters, global climate change, acts of terrorism, global conflicts including the Russia-Ukraine War, the Israel-Hamas War,conflicts, or other similar events have in the past, and may in the future have, a negative impact on our business and operations. Our business and most of the collateral securing our loans are concentrated in California, which is prone to earthquakes, fires, mudslides, drought, flooding and other natural disasters, including the January 2025 Los Angeles county wildfires. These events impact us negatively to the extent that they result in reduced capital markets activity, lower asset price levels, destruction of residential and commercial properties, or disruptions in general economic activity in the United States or abroad, or in financial market settlement functions. Disruptions to our clients could result in increased risk of delinquencies, defaults, foreclosures and losses on our loans.
Additionally, our business and our customers may be affected by shifts in federal trade policy and judicial interpretations of trade authorities. In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the President does not have authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose broad tariffs without explicit congressional authorization, striking down major tariffs previously in place. This decision may reduce certain costs for import-dependent businesses and ease inflationary pressures in affected sectors, but it also introduces uncertainty regarding future trade policy, potential tariff refund claims and shifting trade relationships. The ruling, and any subsequent legislative or executive actions in response, could influence costs for manufacturers and resellers, alter demand for U.S. exports, and affect broader economic conditions. Prolonged uncertainty or volatility in trade policy and economic conditions - whether arising from the Supreme Court’s decision, legislative responses, or other shifts in federal trade authority - could negatively affect consumer spending, business investment and economic growth, which in turn could adversely impact credit quality, loan growth, and demand for banking products and services. Any such effects could materially and adversely affect our consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations.
The trade policies and potential tariff initiatives being pursued by the U.S. government under the administration of President Trump may present risks to our borrowers and the markets within which we operate, particularly with respect to the threatened imposition of additional tariffs on certain products imported from countries such as Mexico, Canada, China, which are significant international trading partners for the California economy. The imposition of tariffs on imports, the potential for retaliatory tariffs by foreign governments, or other similar restrictions on international trade could increase costs for manufacturers and resellers, reduce demand for U.S. exports and disrupt supply chains. Prolonged trade tensions or the implementation of tariffs could negatively impact the broader economic environment, potentially leading to reduced consumer spending, lower economic growth, and decreased demand for other banking products and services. As a result, our financial performance, including credit quality and loan growth, could be adversely affected by these policy changes.
The primary component of our business involves making loans to our clients. The business of lending is inherently risky, including risks that the principal or interest on any loan will not be repaid in a timely manner or at all or that the value of any collateral supporting the loan will be insufficient to cover losses in the event of a default. Our risk management practices, such as managing the concentration of our loans within specific industries, loan types and geographic areas, and our credit approval practices may not adequately reduce credit risk. Further, our credit administration personnel, policies and procedures may not adequately adapt to changes in economic or any other conditions affecting clients and the quality of the loan portfolio. A failure to effectively measure and manage the credit risk, including non-performing assets, associated with our loan portfolio could lead to unexpected losses and have an adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations.
Effective January 1, 2023, we adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standards Update 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” commonly referred to as the “Current Expected Credit Losses” standard, or “CECL.” CECL changes the ACL methodology from an incurred loss concept to an expected loss concept, which is more dependent on future economic forecasts, assumptions and models than previous accounting standards and could result in increases in, and add volatility to, our ACL and future provisions for credit losses. These forecasts, assumptions, and models are inherently uncertain and are based upon management’s reasonable judgment in light of information currently available. Our ACL may not be adequate to absorb actual credit losses, and future provisions for credit losses could materially and adversely affect our operating results. We adopted the provisions of ASC 326 through the application of the modified retrospective transition approach, and recorded a net decrease of approximately $3.9 million to the beginning balance of retained earnings as of January 1, 2023 for the cumulative effect adjustment, reflecting an initial adjustment to the allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) of $5.5 million, net of related deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences of $1.6 million, commonly referred to as the “Day 1” adjustment. The Day 1 adjustment to the ACL is reflective of expected lifetime credit losses associated with the composition of financial assets within the scope of ASC 326 as of January 1, 2023, which is comprised of loans held for investment and off-balance sheet credit exposures at January 1, 2023, as well as management’s current expectation of future economic conditions.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, our CRE loans for purposes of this guidance represented 459.0%469.3% of our total risk-based capital. As of December 31, 2024,2025, total loans secured by CRE under construction and land development represented 45.5%28.0% of our total risk-based capital. As a result, the OCC, which is the Bank’s federal banking regulator,OCC could view the Bank as having a high concentration of CRE loans under this guidance.
We may suffer losses in our loan portfolio despite our underwriting practices.
We mitigate the risks inherent in our loan portfolio by adhering to sound and proven underwriting practices, managed by experienced and knowledgeable credit professionals. These practices include analysis of a borrower’s prior credit history, financial statements, tax returns, cash flow projections, valuations of collateral based on reports of independent appraisers, and verifications of liquid assets. Although we believe that our underwriting criteria is appropriate for the various kinds of loans we make, we may incur losses on loans that meet our underwriting criteria, and these losses may exceed the amounts set aside as reserves in our ACL.
Our loan portfolio may be subject to increased concentration and volatility risks due to variability, driven by large relationship-based lending commitments.
Our loan portfolio includes a limited number of large, real estate secured relationships and lending commitments that are significant in relation to our overall balance sheet. These large, well secured relationships may cause the loan portfolio to experience limited period‑to‑period variability, as the origination, repayment capacity, or modification of such loans may result in meaningful fluctuations in loan balances, asset quality metrics, earnings, and capital ratios. Due to our portfolio characteristics compared to other larger institutions, adverse developments affecting a single large relationship, such as changes in cash flows, liquidity, collateral values, or local economic condition - could have a disproportionate impact on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, repayments or paydowns of large commercial lending commitments may result in limited opportunities in redeploying capital efficiently, which could constrain growth and negatively affect profitability if suitable lending opportunities are not available on comparable terms.
Construction and land development loans are based upon estimates of costs and values associated with the completed project. These estimates may be inaccurate, and we may be exposed to significant losses on loans for these projects.
At December 31, 2024, our construction and land development loans totaled $222.0 million, or 7.1% of our loans held for investment portfolio, excluding SBA loans. These loans involve additional risks because funds are advanced upon the security of the project, which is of uncertain value prior to its completion, and costs may exceed realizable values in declining real estate markets. Because of the uncertainties inherent in estimating construction costs and the realizable market value of the completed project and the effects of governmental regulation of real property, it is relatively difficult to accurately evaluate the total funds required to complete a project and the related loan-to-value ratio. A downturn in the commercial real estate market could increase delinquencies, defaults and foreclosures, and significantly impair the value of our collateral and our ability to sell the collateral upon foreclosure. In addition, this type of lending also typically involves higher loan principal amounts. Some of the builders we deal with have more than one loan outstanding with us. Consequently, an adverse development with respect to one loan or one credit relationship can expose us to a significantly greater risk of loss. In addition, during the term of some of our construction loans, no payment from the borrower is required since the accumulated interest is added to the principal of the loan through an interest reserve. As a result, construction loans often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment dependent, in part, on the success of the ultimate project and the ability of the borrower to sell or lease the property, rather than the ability of the borrower or guarantor to repay principal and interest. Higher than anticipated development costs may cause actual results to vary significantly from those estimated. If our appraisal of the value of the completed project proves to be overstated, or market values or rental rates decline, we may have inadequate security for the repayment of the loan upon completion of construction of the project. In addition, construction loans involve additional cost as a result of the need to actively monitor the building process, including cost comparisons and on-site inspections.
Properties under construction are often difficult to sell and typically must be completed in order to be successfully sold, which complicates the process of working with our problem construction loans. If we are forced to foreclose on a project prior to or at completion due to a default, we may not be able to recover all of the unpaid balance of, and accrued interest on, the loan as well as related foreclosure and holding costs. In addition, we may be required to fund additional amounts to complete the project and may have to hold the property for an unspecified period of time while we attempt to dispose of it. Further, in the case of speculative construction loans, there is the added risk associated with the borrower obtaining a take-out commitment for a permanent loan. Loans on land under development or held for future construction also pose additional risk because of the lack of income production by the property and the potential illiquid nature of the collateral.
For all of these reasons and uncertainties,Our construction and land development loans mayinvolve represent greateradditional risks thanthat othercould typesresult ofin loans.higher losses.
At December 31, 2025, our construction and land development loans totaled $134.3 million, or 4.4% of our loans held for investment portfolio, excluding SBA loans. Typical for the construction loan segment, these loans involve additional risks because funds are advanced upon the progress of the project, which often exhibits volatile completion value, as among other things, costs may exceed realizable values in declining real estate markets. A downturn in the commercial real estate market could increase delinquencies, defaults and foreclosures, and significantly impair the value of our collateral and our ability to sell the collateral upon foreclosure. During the term of construction loans, often no payment from the borrower is required since the accumulated interest is included in the loan commitment through an interest reserve. As a result, construction loans often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment dependent, in part, on the success of the ultimate project and the ability of the borrower to sell, operate, or lease the property, rather than the ability of the borrower or guarantor to repay principal and interest.
Properties under construction are often difficult to sell, either by the borrower of the bank upon foreclosure, and typically must be completed in order to be successfully sold, which may increase our loss exposure. Further, in the case of speculative construction loans, there is the added risk associated with the borrower obtaining a take-out commitment for a permanent loan. Loans on secured by land under development or held for future construction also pose additional risk because of the lack of income production by the property, the volatility of the future value, and the potential illiquid nature of the collateral. For these reasons and uncertainties, and typical for this product type, construction and land development loans may represent greater risks than other types of loans.
SBA lending is an important part of our business. Our SBA lending program is dependent upon the U.S. federal government, and we face specific risks associated with originating SBA loans.
Our SBA lending program is dependent upon the U.S. federal government. We are designated by the SBA as a Preferred Lender. As an SBA Preferred Lender, we are able to offer SBA loans to our customers without the potentially lengthy SBA approval process for application, servicing or liquidation actions required for lenders that are not SBA Preferred Lenders. The SBA periodically reviews the lending operations of participating lenders to assess, among other things, whether the lender exhibits prudent risk management. When weaknesses are identified, the SBA may request corrective actions or impose enforcement actions, including the potential loss of the SBA Preferred Lender designation. If we lose our status as an SBA Preferred Lender, we may lose some or all of our SBA loan customers to lenders who are SBA Preferred Lenders, and as a result we could experience a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial results.
Any changes to the SBA program, including but not limited to changes to the level of guarantee provided by the federal government on SBA loans, changes to program specific rules impacting volume eligibility under the guaranty program, as well as changes to the program amounts authorized by Congress or funding for the SBA program may also have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, any default by the U.S. government on its obligations or any prolonged government shutdown could, among other things, impede our ability to originate SBA loans or sell such loans in the secondary market, which could materially and adversely affect our business, consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations.
The SBA’s 7(a) Loan Program is the SBA’s primary program for helping small businesses, with financing guaranteed for a variety of general business purposes. Typically, we sell the guaranteed portion of our SBA 7(a) loans in the secondary market. These sales result in premium income for us at the time of sale and create a stream of future servicing income, as we retain the servicing rights to these loans. For the reasons described above, we may not be able to continue originating these loans or selling them in the secondary market. Furthermore, even if we are able to continue to originate and sell SBA 7(a) loans in the secondary market, we might not continue to realize premiums upon the sale of the guaranteed portion of these loans or the premiums may decline due to economic and competitive factors. When we originate SBA 7(a) loans, we incur credit risk on the non-guaranteed portion of the loans, and if a customer defaults on a loan, we share any loss and recovery related to the loan pro-rata with the SBA. If the SBA establishes that a loss on an SBA guaranteed loan is attributable to significant technical deficiencies in the manner in which the loan was originated, funded or serviced by us, the SBA may seek recovery of the principal loss related to the deficiency from us. Generally, we do not maintain reserves or loss allowances for such potential claims and any such claims could materially and adversely affect our business, consolidated financial condition or consolidated results of operations.
As of December 31, 2024, we had $189.4 million of SBA loans, or 6.1% of total loans held for investment. The laws, regulations and standard operating procedures that are applicable to SBA loan products may change in the future. We cannot predict the effects of these changes on our business and profitability. Because government regulation greatly affects the business and financial results of all commercial banks and bank holding companies and especially our organization, changes in the laws, regulations and procedures applicable to SBA loans could adversely affect our ability to operate profitably.
Furthermore, loans generally are not readily convertible to cash. From time to time, if our ability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, the sale of investment securities and other sources are not sufficient to meet our liquidity needs, we may be required to rely on alternative funding sources of liquidity to meet growth in loans, deposit withdrawal demands or otherwise fund operations. Such alternative funding sources include FHLB advances, Federal Reserve borrowings, brokered deposits, unsecured federal funds lines of credit from correspondent banks and/or accessing the equity or debt capital markets. The availability of these alternative funding sources is subject to broad economic conditions, to regulation and to investor assessment of our financial strength and, as such, the cost of funds may fluctuate significantly and/or the availability of such funds may be restricted, thus impacting our net interest income, our immediate liquidity and/or our access to additional liquidity. Additionally, if we fail to remain “ well-capitalized” our ability to utilize brokered deposits may be restricted. We have somewhat similar risks to the extent high balance core deposits (defined as noninterest-bearing demand, interest-bearing NOW, money market and savings account customer relationships, excluding brokered deposits) exceed the amount of deposit insurance coverage available.
We anticipate we will continue to rely primarily on deposits, loan repayments, and cash flows from our investment securities to provide liquidity. Additionally, when necessary, the alternative funding sources of borrowed funds described above will be used to augment our primary funding sources. An inability to maintain or raise funds (including the inability to access alternative funding sources) in amounts necessary to meet our liquidity needs would have a substantial negative effect, individually or collectively, on our liquidity. Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance our activities, or on terms attractive to us, could be impaired by factors that affect us specifically or the financial services industry in general. For example, factors that could detrimentally impact our access to liquidity sources include our consolidated financial results, a decrease in the level of our business activity due to a market downturn or adverse regulatory action against us, a reduction in our credit rating, any damage to our reputation, counterparty availability, changes in the activities of our business partners, changes affecting our loan portfolio or other assets, or any other event that could cause a decrease in depositor or investor confidence in our creditworthiness and business. Those factors may lead to depositors withdrawing their deposits or creditors limiting our borrowings. OurA accessportion of our deposits may exceed FDIC insurance limits, and uninsured depositors may be more likely to liquiditywithdraw their funds during periods of actual or perceived financial stress affecting us or the banking industry generally. Rapid and unexpected deposit outflows, including those driven by negative publicity, social media, or a loss of depositor confidence, could alsorequire be impaired by factors that are not specificus to us,seek suchmore as general business conditions, interest rate fluctuations, severe volatilityexpensive or disruptionless ofreadily theavailable financialalternative markets,funding banksources, closureswhich orcould negative viewsmaterially and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry as a whole, or legal, regulatory, accounting, and tax environments governing our funding transactions. In addition, our ability to raise funds is strongly affected by the general state of the U.S. and world economies and financial markets as well as the policies and capabilities of the U.S. government and its agencies, and may remain or become increasingly difficult due to economic and other factors beyond our control. Any such event or failure to manage our liquidity effectively couldadversely affect our competitiveliquidity, position,net increaseinterest our borrowing costsmargin, and the interest rates we pay on deposits, limit our access to the capital markets and have a material adverse effect on our consolidatedoverall financial condition and consolidated results of operations.condition.
Our access to liquidity could also be impaired by factors that are not specific to us, such as general business conditions, interest rate fluctuations, severe volatility or disruption of the financial markets, bank closures or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry as a whole, or legal, regulatory, accounting, and tax environments governing our funding transactions. In addition, our ability to raise funds is strongly affected by the general state of the U.S. and world economies and financial markets as well as the policies and capabilities of the U.S. government and its agencies, and may remain or become increasingly difficult due to economic and other factors beyond our control. Any such event or failure to manage our liquidity effectively could affect our competitive position, increase our borrowing costs and the interest rates we pay on deposits, limit our access to the capital markets and have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations.
The Company is a separate and distinct legal entity from the Bank. As a holding company with no significant assets other than the Bank, the Company depends on dividends from the Bank to fund operating expenses, service debtdebt, pay dividends, repurchase shares, and pay taxes. WhileThe Bank paid $60.0 million in dividends to the Company hasduring not historically paid dividends or repurchased shares, its ability to do so would depend in large part upon the receipt of dividends or other capital distributions from the Bank.2025. The ability of the Bank to pay dividends or make other capital distributions is subject to the restrictions of the National Bank Act.Act In addition, it is possible, depending uponand the financial condition of the Bank and other factors, that the OCC could assert that payment of dividends or other payments is an unsafe or unsound practice. The amountrequirement that the Bank may pay in dividends is further restricted due to the fact that the Bank must maintainmaintains a certain minimum amount of capital to be considered a “well capitalized” institution as well as a separate capital conservation buffer. See “Supervision and Regulation - Capital Adequacy.” Details regarding the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios and the amount of required capital are included in Note 1617 — Regulatory Matters of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this annual report. In addition, it is possible, depending upon the financial condition of the Bank and other factors, that the OCC could assert that payment of dividends or other payments is an unsafe or unsound practice.
As part of our growth strategy, we intend to pursue prudent and commercially attractive acquisitions that will position us to capitalize on market opportunities. Over the last three years, we have grown rapidly through both organic growth and acquisitions.
Combining the Company and CALB may be more costly than expected and the anticipated benefits and cost savings of the merger may not be realized.
Our future results of operations will depend in large part on our ability to successfully integrate the operations of CALB with our own and retain our and CALB’s customers. If we are unable to successfully manage the integration of the separate cultures, customer bases and operating systems of the acquired institutions, our consolidated results of operations may be adversely affected. Further, the success of the Merger will continue to depend, in part, on our ability to realize the anticipated cost savings from combining our businesses and with that of CALB. To realize the anticipated benefits and cost savings, we must continue to combine both businesses in a manner that permits growth opportunities and does not materially disrupt the existing customer relations nor result in decreased revenues due to loss of customers. In addition, the actual cost savings could be less than anticipated.
Competition in the banking and financial services industry is intense. We compete with commercial banks, credit unions, mortgage banking firms, finance companies, non-bank lenders including “fintech” lenders,lending and payment companies, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market funds and other mutual funds, as well as regional and national financial institutions that operate offices in our market areas and elsewhere. Many of these competitors have substantially greater name recognition, resources and lending limits than we do and may offer certain services or prices for services that we do not or cannot provide. Our profitability depends upon our continued ability to successfully compete in our markets.
KEY PERSONNEL RISKS
If we are not able to attract, retain and motivate key personnel, our business could be negatively affected.
Our future success depends in large part on our ability to retain and motivate our existing employees and attract new employees. Competition for the best employees can be intense. If we are not able to attract, retain and motivate key personnel, both in business line and corporate functions, it could have a material adverse impact on our growth, consolidated results of operations and consolidated financial condition.
We are subject to capital adequacy guidelines and other regulatory requirements specifying minimum amounts and types of capital which we must maintain. OurIf failurewe fail to meet the minimum capital guidelines and other regulatory requirements as applicable regulatoryto us, then we may be restricted in the types of activities that we may conduct, and we may be prohibited from taking certain capital actions. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements could result in onecertain ormandatory moreand ofpossible ouradditional discretionary actions by regulators placingthat, limitationsif orundertaken, conditionscould have a material adverse effect on our activities,financial includingcondition and results of operations. The application of more stringent capital requirements could, among other things, adversely affect our growthresults initiatives,of oroperations restrictingand growth, require the commencementraising of newadditional activities,capital, and could affect client and investor confidence, our costs of funds and FDIC insurance costs,restrict our ability to pay dividends,dividends ouror abilityrepurchase shares and result in regulatory actions if we were to make acquisitions, and our business, consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations. These limitations establish a maximum percentage of eligible retained income that could be utilizedunable forto thesecomply actions.with such requirements. See “Supervision and Regulation - Capital Requirements.” Details regarding the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios and the amount of required capital are included in Note 1617 — Regulatory Matters of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 in this annual report.
The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological changes, with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services, including the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning to interact with customers and review to review and analyze data. The effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to better serve customers and reduce costs. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands for convenience, as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations. Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements than we have. As a result, competitors may be able to offer additional or superior products compared to those that we will be able to provide, which would put us at a competitive disadvantage. We may not be able to implement new technology-driven products and services effectively or be successful in marketing these products and services to our customers. Failure to keep pace successfully with technological change affecting the financial services industry could harm our ability to compete effectively and could have an adverse effect on our business, growth and consolidated results of operations.
The development and use of artificial intelligence presents risk and challenges that may adversely impact our business.
Concerns over the long-term impact of climate change could significantly affect our geographic markets and disrupt our operations, those of our customers, third parties on which we rely, or supply chains more broadly. These disruptions, including increased regulatory costs and changes in consumer behavior, could weaken economic conditions in affected markets or industries, impair customers’ ability to repay loans or maintain deposits, and reduce the value of collateral securing our loans.
Concerns over the long-term impact of climate change have led and will continue to lead to governmental efforts to mitigate those impact. Consumers and businesses also may change their behavior as a result of these concerns. We and our customers will need to respond to new laws and regulations as well as consumer and business preferences resulting from climate change concerns. We and our customers may face cost increases, asset value reductions and operating process changes. Among the impact to us could be a drop in demand for our products and services, particularly in certain sectors. In addition, we could face reductions in creditworthiness on the part of some customers or in the value of assets securing loans. Our efforts to take these risks into account in making lending and other decisions, may not be effective in protecting us from the negative impact of new laws and regulations or changes in consumer or business behavior.
We have made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period, to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Material estimates subject to change in the near term include, among other items, the ACL, particularly in light of our adoption of the CECL standard in 2023ACL; the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations and related purchase price allocation, the valuation of acquired loans, the valuation of goodwill and separately identifiable intangible assets associated with mergers and acquisitions, loan sales and servicing of financial assets and deferred tax assets and liabilities. These estimates may be adjusted as more current information becomes available, and any adjustment may be significant.
We may reduce or discontinue the payment of dividends on our common stock.
Holders of our common stock are only entitled to receive such dividends as our Board of Directors declares out of funds legally available for such payments. Although we initiated the payment of a quarterly dividend in the fourth quarter of 2025, there may be circumstances under which we would reduce, suspend, or eliminate our common stock dividend in the future. This could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
As a bank holding company, our ability to pay dividends is affected by the policies and enforcement powers of the Federal Reserve and any future payment of dividends will depend on the Bank’s ability to make distributions and payments to the Company as our principal source of funds to pay such dividends. The Bank is also subject to various legal, regulatory and other restrictions on its ability to make distributions and payments to the Company. There are numerous laws and banking regulations that restrict the Bank’s ability to pay dividends or make capital distributions to the Company. These statutes and regulations require, among other things, that the Bank maintain certain levels of capital in order to pay a dividend. Further, our banking authorities have the ability to restrict the Bank’s payment of dividends through supervisory action. In addition, in the future, we may enter into borrowing or other contractual arrangements that restrict our ability to pay dividends. As a consequence of these various limitations and restrictions, we may not be able to make the payment of dividends on our common stock in the future.
Our common stock currently has a limited trading market and is thinly traded, and a more liquid market for our common stock may not develop.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Market and Banking Industry Updates”
New heading “(3)Other includes gas station and retirement properties.”
New heading “(4)Included reciprocal deposit products of $1.7 million and $76.5 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.”
New heading “(5)Included CDARS deposits of $45.4 million and $65.4 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.”
New heading “(1)Amounts exclude fair value adjustments for acquired time deposits.”
New heading “(1)Amounts exclude net unamortized fair value adjustments.”
Removed heading “Southern California Wildfires”
Removed heading “Impact of Changes in Federal Fund Interest Rate on the Economy and Banking Industry”
Removed heading “(1)Weighted average yields are computed based on the amortized cost of the individual underlying securities.”
Removed heading “(1)Weighted average yields are computed based on the amortized cost of the individual underlying securities.”
Removed heading “(1)Represents the impact of adopting ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses on January 1, 2023. As a result of adopting ASU 2016-13, the Company’s methodology to compute our ACL is based on a CECL methodology, rather than the previously applied incurred loss methodology.”
Removed heading “(2)Included reciprocal deposit products of $76.6 million at December 31, 2024. There were no reciprocal deposits at December 31, 2023.”
Removed heading “(3)Included reciprocal deposit products of $536.0 million and $265.7 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.”
Largest changes
“Concerns regarding a potential recession have moderated with the full year advance estimate for 2024 U.S. GDP reported at 2.8%, slowing to 2.3% in the fourth quarter of 2024, with Moody’s full-year baseline 2025 GDP growth forecast estimate at 2.3%. California’s 2024 GDP increased by 3.4% from 2023 and is forecast by Moody’s to decrease to 1.6% in 2025. …”see in full comparison
“At its December 10, 2025, meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee lowered the target range for the Fed funds rate to a range of 3.50% to 3.75%, This marked the third consecutive rate cut following the September 2025 reduction. …”see in full comparison
“The rapid rise in interest rates between 2022 and 2023 resulted in an industry-wide reduction in the fair value of many banks’ securities portfolios, pressuring their liquidity. The subsequent bank runs led to the failure of several financial institutions beginning in March of 2023 and the distress at New York Community Bank in early 2024, fostering a state of volatility and uncertainty with respect to the health of the U.S. banking system, particularly around liquidity, uninsured deposits and customer concentrations. …”see in full comparison
“On January 1, 2023, we adopted ASU 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (Topic 326), which replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology with a methodology that reflects current expected credit losses (“CECL”) and requires consideration of historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts to estimate expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date. …”see in full comparison
“Goodwill totaled $111.8 million and $37.8 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The $74.0 million increase was due to the goodwill recognized upon completion of the Merger during the third quarter of 2024. On an ongoing basis, we qualitatively assess if current events or circumstances warrant the need for an interim quantitative assessment of goodwill impairment. We also monitor fluctuations in our stock prices. …”see in full comparison
“During the third quarter of 2025, the Company downgraded a $16.1 million commercial and industrial loan that was originated in April 2022 to substandard accruing from pass rating. The loan is secured by an original note backed by a commercial real estate property and is supported, in part, by a limited 50% guaranty. The downgrade was due in part, to ongoing third-party litigation against the guarantor. The loan was current on its payment obligations as of December 31, 2025. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (193)
California BanCorp, formerly known as Southern California Bancorp,BanCorp is a California corporation incorporated on October 2, 2019, and headquartered in Del Mar, California. On May 15, 2020, we completed a reorganization whereby California Bank of Commerce, N.A., formerly known as Bank of Southern California, N.A.,N.A. became the wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. California Bank of Commerce, N.A. has a wholly-owned subsidiary, BCAL OREO1, LLC, which was incorporated on February 14, 2024. BCAL OREO1, LLC is used for holding other real estate owned and other assets acquired by foreclosure. We are regulated as a bank holding company by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”). The Bank operates under a national charter and is regulated by the Office of Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”).
We are a relationship-focused community bank and we offer a range of financial products and services to individuals, professionals, and small-small to medium-sized businesses through our 14 branch offices and 11 commercial banking offices serving the state of California. We keep a steady focus on our solution-driven, relationship-based approach to banking, providing clients accessibility to decision makers and enhancing the value of our services through strong client partnerships. Our lending products consist primarily of construction and land development loans, real estate loans, C&I loans and consumer loans, and we are a Preferred SBA Lender. Our deposit products consist primarily of demand deposit, money market, and certificates of deposit. In addition, we are a participant in the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (“CDARS”), and IntraFi Network Insured Cash Sweep (“ICS”), and Reich & Tang Deposit Solutions (“R&T”) networks. We receive an equal dollar amount of deposits (“reciprocal deposits”) from other participating banks in exchange for the deposits we place into the networks to fully qualify large customer deposits for FDIC insurance. We also provide treasury management services including online banking, cash vault, sweep accounts and lock box services.
Merger with the former California BanCorp (“CALB”)
On July 31, 2024, wethe Company completed its all-stock merger with CALB on the terms set forth in the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated January 30, 2024, by and between usthe Company and CALB. At July 31, 2024, CALB had total loans of $1.43 billion, total assets of $1.91 billion, and total deposits of $1.64 billion. Immediately following the merger of CALB with and into the Company, California Bank of Commerce, a California state-chartered bank and wholly-owned subsidiary of CALB, merged with and into the Bank. Effective with these mergers, the corporate names of Southern California Bancorp and Bank of Southern California, N.A. were changed to California BanCorp and California Bank of Commerce, N.A., respectively. The merger expandsexpanded the Company’s footprint into Northern California and providesprovided an opportunity for building scale and increasing market share through complementary business models with a strong deposit base. The combined company retained all banking offices of both banks, adding CALB’s one full-service bank branch and its four loan production offices in Northern California to the Bank’s 13 full-service bank branches located throughout the Southern California region for a total of 14 Bankbank branches.
Market and Banking Industry Updates
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed in 2025 includes a broad range of tax reform provisions impacting individuals and businesses, along with substantial cuts to social programs and reduced funding for financial oversight agencies, including the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. These changes may affect deposit customers, borrowers, and the banking industry. The full impact of the Act is still being assessed and remains uncertain at this time. Separately, California’s single sales factor apportionment bill for financial institutions did not have a material impact on our estimated income tax expense, deferred taxes, or other comprehensive income.
At its December 10, 2025, meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee lowered the target range for the Fed funds rate to a range of 3.50% to 3.75%, This marked the third consecutive rate cut following the September 2025 reduction. After the meeting, Chairman Powell observed that while important federal government data for the past couple months have yet to be released, available public and private-sector data suggest that the outlook for employment and inflation has not changed much since the FOMC October 2025 meeting, noting conditions in the labor market appear to be cooling, and inflation remains somewhat elevated. He stated available indicators suggest that economic activity has been expanding at a moderate pace and both layoffs and hiring remain low. Following three consecutive rate cuts in late 2025, at their January 2026 meeting, Fed policymakers paused to assess the economy, noting solid expansion, stabilizing unemployment, and somewhat elevated inflation, maintaining the target range for the Fed funds rate at 3.5% to 3.75%, marking a pause in its recent rate-cutting trend. Chairman Powell described the economy as being on “firm footing,” with the meeting Statement noting recent indicators suggest that economic activity has been expanding at a solid pace.
The Fed also announced it will increase the System Open Market Account holdings of securities through purchases of Treasury bills and, if needed, other Treasury securities with remaining maturities of three years or less to maintain an ample level of reserves. This follows the announcement at the October FOMC meeting that the Fed would end quantitative tightening on December 1, 2025, halting the reduction of its balance sheet and injecting additional liquidity into financial markets. In the Fed’s Summary of Economic Projections, the median participant projected that GDP will rise 1.7% in 2025 and 2.3% in 2026.
In response to the tariff policies enacted by the administration in mid-2025, markets experienced some volatility and given the fluid dynamics of the situation we continue to monitor the effect of tariffs and trade negotiations on our clients and we do not currently expect to see an impact on client operations from those events. We have minimal exposure to international trade, although some of our clients do source materials from outside the country.
In California, overall consumer prices are predicted to peak around 3.5% to 3.6% in early 2026 with annual average unemployment of 5.5%, according to the UCLA Anderson School of Management. Moody’s anticipates GDP growth in California to grow to 2.2% in 2025 and to have a slight decrease to 1.9% in 2026. The state has shifted to the position of the world’s fifth-largest economy, following a decline from its previous fourth-place ranking. California’s economy is cooling off, with slower payroll growth and downward revisions widening the gap with national trends. Challenges in the tech sector are expected to persist amid ongoing uncertainty. Building permits declined in 2024 and have yet to show signs of recovery. With the trade war still ongoing, growing uncertainty is prompting businesses and investors to scale back and proceed cautiously. We have observed that some clients have expressed hesitancy in initiating projects due to the uncertain economic environment.
Inflation has had a material impact on the growth of total assets within the banking industry, prompting the need for some institutions to raise equity capital at accelerated rates to preserve a healthy equity-to-assets ratio. It also drives increases in other operating expenses. Management views interest rate risk as the key challenge in mitigating inflation's impact. We undertake substantial efforts to maintain a strategic balance between our rate-sensitive assets and liabilities across economic cycles to reduce volatility in net interest income.
Southern California Wildfires
Early in the first quarter of 2025, several neighborhoods adjacent to Los Angeles were engulfed by wildfires fed by unusually strong Santa Ana winds. The Palisades and Eaton fires were the most damaging of these wildfires, destroying an estimated 12,000 structures between them. We are working with all our constituents to provide assistance during this difficult period, supporting clients and employees affected by the fires, as well as donating money to relief funds and providing volunteer assistance to them. The fires are expected to have a minimal impact on our loan portfolio.
Impact of Changes in Federal Fund Interest Rate on the Economy and Banking Industry
Between March 2022 and September 2023, the Federal Reserve raised interest rates 11 times by an aggregate of 525 basis points, to a range between 5.25% and 5.50%, the highest level in 22 years, in response to an increase in inflation that saw the Consumer Price Index rise to 9.1% in July 2022, which has since moderated to 3.0% in February 2025. At its September 2024 meeting, the Federal Reserve reduced the federal funds interest rate by 50 basis points, followed by two additional 25 basis point reductions in November and December 2024, for a total decrease of 100 basis points in 2024, ending the year in a range of 4.25% to 4.50%.
Concerns regarding a potential recession have moderated with the full year advance estimate for 2024 U.S. GDP reported at 2.8%, slowing to 2.3% in the fourth quarter of 2024, with Moody’s full-year baseline 2025 GDP growth forecast estimate at 2.3%. California’s 2024 GDP increased by 3.4% from 2023 and is forecast by Moody’s to decrease to 1.6% in 2025. Despite the anticipated slowdown in California, it is still considered to have the fifth largest economy in the world; however, higher interest rates and broader economic headwinds have put a damper on investment, particularly in the near term for the tech industry, which employs 8% of the state’s workforce, as tech payrolls have trended lower over the past year and further layoffs are expected. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports California’s December 2024 unemployment rate at 5.5%; it has been in a range between 5.0% and 5.5% since September 2023.
The rapid rise in interest rates between 2022 and 2023 resulted in an industry-wide reduction in the fair value of many banks’ securities portfolios, pressuring their liquidity. The subsequent bank runs led to the failure of several financial institutions beginning in March of 2023 and the distress at New York Community Bank in early 2024, fostering a state of volatility and uncertainty with respect to the health of the U.S. banking system, particularly around liquidity, uninsured deposits and customer concentrations. The situation has stabilized due to strong actions taken by federal regulators in attempts to calm the markets, coupled with the Federal Reserve’s initiation of reductions to the federal funds interest rate.
In remarks delivered at the 2025 U.S. Monetary Policy Forum in New York City Fed Chairman Jerome Powell said that the U.S. economy remains in a good place. However, policymakers are holding steady as they wait for greater clarity on the effects of the Trump administration’s numerous policy changes on the economy; officials are carefully monitoring the effects of the new administration’s policy changes in regard to trade, immigration, fiscal policy, and regulation. Uncertainty around such changes and their likely economic impacts remains high. The Chairman believes that the Fed doesn’t need to move quickly to adjust policy in response yet, but the net effect of these policy changes will matter for the economy and the path of monetary policy. They may also impact financial institutions.
We have a strong consolidated balance sheet with diversified deposit and loan portfolios, with very little sector or individual customer concentration, other than our CRE concentration. Our relationship-based business banking model is founded on strong, ongoing relationships with our commercial clients, which represent a broad variety of industries. We have no meaningful exposure to cryptocurrency or venture capital business models, our accumulated other comprehensive loss on our available-for-sale debt securities is manageable, and our capital position is strong. In 2025 we made significant progress in derisking our consolidated balance sheets, reducing our exposure in the Sponsor Finance portfolio, eliminating our reliance on brokered deposits and improving overall credit quality. The reduction in credit risk in our total loan portfolio is reflected in the reversal of provision for loan losses, from the fourth quarter of 2024 through the second quarter of 2025 and the fourth quarter of 2025. Additionally, our non-performing assets to total assets ratio of 0.40% at December 31, 2025, declined from 0.76% at December 31, 2024, along with a decrease in substandard loans since year-end 2024.
We have a highly skilled and experienced lending production team and credit administration team. Given our concentration in commercial real estate secured loans, we mitigate that risk through comprehensive underwriting policies, semi-annual loan level reviews, close monitoring of self-established industry and geographical and collateral type limits, periodic stress testing and continuous portfolio risk management reporting. Per the regulatory definition of commercial real estate, at December 31, 2024,2025, our concentration of such loans represented 459%469% of our total risk-based capital. In addition, at December 31, 2024,2025, total loans secured by commercial real estate under construction and land development represented 46%28% of our total risk-based capital. The non-performing loans for these segments per the regulatory definition of commercial real estate loans at December 31, 20242025 were $18.6$13.9 million and there were $2.5$1.7 million in net charge-offs during the year ended December 31, 2024.2025. At December 31, 2024,2025, our only OREO, carried at $4.1 million,there was fromno a multifamily nonaccrual loan we foreclosed in 2024.OREO.
Given the nature of our commercial banking business, approximately 49% of our total deposits exceeded the FDIC deposit insurance limits at December 31, 2025.
We strategically manage an investment portfolio focused on high-quality, resilient securities. At December 31, 2025, the amortized cost of our held-to-maturity debt securities was $52.9 million, or approximately 1.3% of total assets. The fair value of our available-for-sale debt securities was $234.9 million, or approximately 5.8% of total assets. The 10-Year Treasury Bond was approximately 4.2% at December 31, 2025, compared to 4.6% at December 31, 2024. The decrease in the 10-Year Treasury Bond in 2025, resulted in lower net unrealized losses on our debt securities at December 31, 2025. At December 31, 2025, our accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes, decreased to $1.6 million, compared to $6.6 million at December 31, 2024. If we realized all of our unrealized losses on both held-to-maturity and available-for-sale debt securities, our losses, net of taxes would be $4.2 million at December 31, 2025. The results of our stress testing on our debt security portfolio at December 31, 2025, illustrated that our losses, net of taxes on both held-to-maturity and available-for-sale debt securities would increase to $38.3 million in a 300 basis point rate increase shock scenario. If we realized all of these unrealized losses, the Bank would continue to exceed all regulatory capital requirements necessary to be considered well capitalized.
Given the nature of our commercial banking business, approximately 46% of our total deposits exceeded the FDIC deposit insurance limits at December 31, 2024. However, we offer our deposit customers access to the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (“CDARS”), IntraFi Network Insured Cash Sweep (“ICS”), and Reich & Tang Deposit Solutions (“R&T”) networks. We receive an equal dollar amount of reciprocal deposits from other participating banks in exchange for the deposits we place into the networks to fully qualify large customer deposits for FDIC insurance. These reciprocal deposits allow us to divide customers’ deposits that exceed the FDIC insurance limits into smaller amounts, below the FDIC insurance limits, and place those deposits in other participating FDIC insured institutions with the convenience of managing all deposit accounts through our Bank. These reciprocal deposits are not required to be treated as brokered deposits up to the lesser of 20% of the Bank’s total liabilities or $5 billion. Our total reciprocal deposits increased to $754.4 million, representing 22.2% of total deposits and 21.8% of Bank’s total liabilities at December 31, 2024, compared to $274.1 million, or 14% of total deposits at December 31, 2023. The excess over 20% increased our wholesale funding to total assets ratio and net non core funding dependence ratio. These two ratios are within the Bank's internal policy limit. In connection with the Merger, the Company acquired $442.7 million in fair value of reciprocal deposits, which included $98.4 million in ICS, $306.6 million in R&T and $37.7 in CDARS.
At December 31, 2024, our liquidity position remained strong, with the following financial balances (unaudited), compared to December 31, 2023:
•Total cash and cash equivalents of approximately $388.2 million, compared to $86.8 million.
•Total liquidity ratio of approximately 15.7%, compared to 11.1%.
•Unpledged, liquid securities at fair value were approximately $129.4 million, compared to $130.0 million.
•Available borrowing capacity from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) secured lines of credit of approximately $753.9 million, compared to $339.2 million. At December 31, 2024, there were no overnight FHLB borrowings.
•Available borrowing capacity from the Federal Reserve Discount Window program was approximately $318.5 million, compared to $141.6 million. There were no outstanding borrowings under this program at December 31, 2024.
•Available borrowing capacity from four unsecured credit lines from correspondent banks totaling $90.5 million, compared to three unsecured credit lines from correspondent banks totaling $75.0 million. There were no outstanding borrowings on these lines at December 31, 2024.
•Total available borrowing capacity was approximately $1.16 billion at December 31, 2024, compared to $555.8 million.
•Total available liquidity was approximately $1.68 billion at December 31, 2024, compared to $772.6 million at December 31, 2023.
We continue to monitor macroeconomic variables related to increasingchanges in interest rates, inflation, and concerns regarding an economic downturndownturn, and its potential effects on our business, customers, employees, communities and markets. The following challenges could have an impact on our business, consolidated financial condition or near- or longer-term consolidated results of operations:
•Credit quality deterioration of our loan portfolio resulting in additional provision for credit losses and charge-offsimpairment charges;
•Margin pressure in response to potentialchanges furtherin rateinterest cuts by the Federal Reserverates;
•Struggles to drive efficiencies across functions while maintaining cost-effectiveness;
•Merger cost savings being less than anticipated;
•The rising threat of cyberattacks and substantial investment required for protection; and
•Potential negative effects of current and future governmental, monetary and fiscal policies, such as the implementation of tariffs and counter-tariffs on future business conditions.
On January 1, 2023, we adopted ASU 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (Topic 326), which replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology with a methodology that reflects current expected credit losses (“CECL”) and requires consideration of historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts to estimate expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date. The measurement of expected credit losses under the CECL is applicable to financial assets measured at amortized cost, including loans, held-to-maturity debt securities and off-balance sheet credit exposures. ASU 2016-13 also requires credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities be measured through an allowance for credit losses. If the measurement indicates that a credit loss exists, the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security are compared to the amortized cost basis of the security. If the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis, a credit loss exists and an allowance for credit losses ("ACL") is recorded for the credit loss, limited by the amount that the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis. In addition, ASU 2016-13 modifies the other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) model for available-for-sale debt securities to require an allowance for credit impairment instead of a direct write-down, which allows for reversal of credit impairments in future periods based on improvements in credit. We elected to account for accrued interest receivable separately from the amortized cost of loans and investment securities. We elected the CECL phase-in option provided by regulatory capital rules, which delays the impact of CECL on regulatory capital over a three-year transition period.
Concurrent with the adoption of ASU 2016-13, we adopted ASU 2022-02, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326) Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDR”) and Vintage Disclosures, which eliminated TDR accounting prospectively for all loan modifications occurring on or after January 1, 2023 and added additional disclosure requirements for current period gross charge-offs by year of origination. It also prescribes guidance for reporting modifications for certain loan re-financings and restructurings made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty. Loans that were considered a TDR prior to the adoption of ASU 2022-02 will continue to be accounted for under the superseded TDR accounting guidance until the loan is paid off, liquidated, or subsequently modified.
Please also see Significant Accounting Polices under Note 1 — Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this annual report for additional information.
The ACL on loans held for investment represents the portion of the loans’ amortized cost basis that we do not expect to collect due to anticipated credit losses over the loans’ contractual life. Amortized cost does not include accrued interest, which management elected to exclude from the estimate of expected credit losses. Provision(Reversal of) provision for credit losses for loans held for investment is included in the (reversal of) provision for credit losses in the consolidated statements of income. Loan charge-offs are recognized when management believes the collectability of the principal balance outstanding is unlikely. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the ACL. Credit losses are not estimated for accrued interest receivable, as interest that is deemed uncollectible is written off through interest income.
The Company’s loan portfolio consists of the following loan segments, based on regulatory call codes and related risk ratings:
•Real estate:
Consumer loans consist of loans to individuals for personal and household purposes, including secured and unsecured installment loans and revolving lines of credit. Also included in our consumer loan portfolio arewere consumer solar panel loans that were acquired as part of the merger with CALB. At December 31, 2025, the consumer solar panel loans were transferred to loans held for sale at fair value. They consist of residential solar panel loans to consumers with an average individual term ranging from 10 to 20 years and are primarily collateralized by the related equipment. TheThese remainingloans averagewere termoriginated rangesand fromserviced 6by tounaffiliated 23third years.parties. Consumer loans are underwritten based on the borrower’s income, current debt level, past credit history, and the availability and value of collateral. Consumer rates are both fixed and variable, with negotiable terms. The Company’s installment loans typically amortize over periods up to 5 years. Although the Company typically requires monthly payments of interest and a portion of the principal on its loan products, the Company will offer consumer loans with a single maturity date when a specific source of repayment is available. Consumer loans are generally considered to have greater risk than first or second mortgages on real estate because they may be unsecured, or, if they are secured, the value of the collateral may be difficult to assess and more likely to decrease in value than real estate.
Our ACL model incorporates assumptions for prepayment/curtailment rates, probability of default (“PD”), and loss given default (“LGD”) to project each loan’s cash flow throughout its entire life cycle. An initial reserve amount is determined based on the difference between the amortized cost basis of each loan and the present value of all future cash flows. The initial reserve amount is then aggregated at the loan segment level to derive the segment level quantitative loss rates. For prepayment and curtailment rate,rates, the Company utilized Abrigo’s benchmark since the adoption on January 1, 2023 through the second quarter of 2023 and switched to the Company’s own historical prepayment and curtailment experience beginning in the third quarter of 2023. Quarterly PD is forecasted using a regression model that incorporates certain economic variables as inputs. The LGD is derived from PD using the Frye-Jacobs index provided by our third-party model provider. Reasonable and supportable forecasts are used to predict current and future economic conditions. Management elected to use a four quarter reasonable and supportable forecast period followed by an eight quarter straight-line reversion period. After twelve quarters of forecast plus reversion period, the PD is assumed to remain unchanged for the remaining life of the loan.
Allowance for Credit Losses — Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures The Company also maintains a separate allowance for off-balance sheet commitments. Beginning January 1, 2023, management estimates anticipated losses using expected loss factors consistent with those used for the ACL methodology for loans described above, and utilization assumptions based on historical experience. Provision for credit losses for off-balance sheet commitments is included in provision for (reversal of) credit losses in the consolidated statements of operations and added to the allowance for off-balance sheet commitments, which is included in accrued interest payable and other liabilities in theour consolidated balance sheets. Management evaluates the loss exposure for off-balance sheet commitments to extend credit following the same principles used for the ACL, with consideration of experienced utilization rates on client credit lines and the inherently lower risk of unfunded loan commitments relative to disbursed commitments. Provision for credit losses for off-balance sheet commitments is included in (reversal of) provision for credit losses in the consolidated statements of income and added to the allowance for off-balance sheet commitments.
(4)Average tangible common equity is computed by subtracting average goodwill and average intangible assets (“net average intangible assets”) from average shareholders’ equity.
(1)After-tax Day 1 provision for non-PCD loans and unfunded loan commitments and after-tax merger and related expenses are presented using a 29.56% tax rate.
The comparability of our financial information is affected by the merger with CALB. We completed this Merger on July31,July 31, 2024. This merger has been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting and, accordingly, CALB’s operating results have been included in the consolidated financial statements for periods beginning after July 31, 2024. Refer to Note 2 - Business Combinations of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplemental Data of this filing for more information regarding business combinations and related activity.
Net income for the year ended December 31, 20242025 was $5.4$63.1 million, or $0.22$1.93 per diluted share, compared to net income of $25.9$5.4 million, or $1.39$0.22 per diluted share in the prior year. The $20.5$57.6 million decreaseincrease in net income from the prior year was primarily due to a $20.8 million increase in the provision for credit losses, and a $38.0 million increase in noninterest expense, partially offset by a $28.8$46.1 million increase in net interest income andfrom higher average interest-earning assets resulting from the Merger, a $8.1$30.5 million decrease in the provision for credit losses as the comparable 2024 period included a $21.3 million provision for credit losses on loans and unfunded commitments related to the Merger, and a $6.3 million increase in noninterest income, partially offset by a $3.3 million increase in noninterest expense, and a $22.1 million increase in income taxes. Pre-tax, pre-provision income for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $79.1 million, an increase of $49.2 million compared to pre-tax, pre-provision income of $30.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. Excluding one-time CECL-related provision for credit losses on acquired non-PCD loans and unfunded loan commitments, and merger related expenses, the Company would have reported net income (non-GAAP) of $32.4 million, or $1.32 per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2024. Pre-tax, pre-provision income for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $30.0 million, a decrease of $7.8 million, or 20.7% compared to pre-tax, pre-provision income of $37.8 million for the yearcomparable ended2024 December 31, 2023.period.
Net interest income is our primary source of revenue, which is the difference between interest income on loans, debt securities and other investments (collectively, “interest-earning assets”) and interest expense on deposits and borrowings (collectively, “interest-bearing liabilities”). Net interest margin represents net interest income expressed as a percentage of interest-earning assets. Net interest income is affected by changes in volume, mix, and rates of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as days in a period. We closely monitor both total net interest income and the net interest margin and seek to maximize net interest income without exposing us to an excessive level of interest rate risk through our asset and liability management policies. The following table presents interest income, average interest-earning assets, interest expense, average interest-bearing liabilities, and their corresponding yields and costs for the years indicated:
We closely monitor both total net interest income and the net interest margin and seek to maximize net interest income without exposing us to an excessive level of interest rate risk through our asset and liability management policies.
The following table presents interest income, average interest-earning assets, interest expense, average interest-bearing liabilities, and their corresponding yields and costs for the years indicated:
(1)Total loans are net of deferred loan origination fees/costs and discounts/premiums, and include average balances of loans held for sale and nonperformingnon-performing loans. Interest income includesincluded accretion of net deferred loan fees and net discounts on acquired loans of $21.3 million, $12.3 million and $2.0 million for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively.
Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 20242025 was $123.0$169.1 million, compared to $94.1$123.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The increase was primarily due to a $56.3$46.2 million increase in total interest income, partially offset by a $27.4$74 millionthousand increase in total interest expense. The increase in interest income and interest expense primarily relates to increases in total average interest-earning assets and total average interest-bearing liabilities from the Merger during the third quarter of 2024, coupledpartially withoffset anby increase inlower yields on interest-earningsinterest earning assets and anlower increaseinterest inbearing costliabilities of funds.costs. During the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, total loan interest income increased $46.0$36.0 million, of which $10.4$19.1 million was related to accretion income from the net purchase accounting discounts on acquired loans, total debt securities income increased $1.9$2.0 million, and interest and dividend income from other financial institutions and other interest-earning assets increased $8.4$8.3 million. The increase in interest income was primarily driven by the higher average total interest-earning assets and the mix of interest-earning assets added by the Merger and the impact of the accretion and amortization of fair value marks. AverageThe increase in interest income was primarily due to higher average balances, due in part to the Merger, partially offset by a 17 basis point decrease in yield on the total average interest-earning assets for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the same 2024 period. Total average interest-earning assets increased $699.9$840.4 million, resulting from a $524.7$570.8 million increase in average total loans, ana $18.0$42.2 million increase in total average debt securities, a $125.1$223.9 million increase in average deposits in other financial institutions, and a $25.9$9.6 million increase in restricted stock investments and other bank stock, partially offset by a $5.9 million decrease in average Fed funds sold/resale agreements.
During the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, total interest expense increased by $27.4$74 thousand to $56.9 million as compared to $56.8the million,same period in 2024, comprised primarily of a $25.9$575 millionthousand increase in interest expenseon borrowings from higher average borrowing balances from the Merger, partially offset by a $501 thousand decrease in interest on average interest-bearing deposits anddriven aby $1.5the million increasedecrease in interest expense on average total borrowings due to increases related to interest-bearing deposits and subordinated debt acquired from the Merger, coupled with the repricingcost of interest-bearing deposits inbetween periods, partially offset by the higherincrease interestin rateaverage environmentinterest-bearing anddeposits peer bank deposit competition overfrom the first three quarters of 2024.Merger.
Net interest margin for the year ended December 31, 20242025 was 4.28%,4.55%, compared with 4.33%4.28% for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The decreaseincrease was primarily related to a 6646 basis point increasedecrease in the cost of funds, partially offset by a 5717 basis point increasedecrease in the total interest-earning assets yield resulting from higherlower market interest rates and a change in our interest-earning asset mix. The yield on total interest-earningearning assets during the year ended December 31, 20242025 was 6.26%,6.09%, compared with 5.69%6.26% for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The yield on average total loans during the year ended December 31, 20242025 was 6.55%,6.50%, a 615 basis point increasedecrease from 5.94%6.55% for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The Federal Reserve’s reductions to the federal funds target rate by 100 basis points in the second half of 2024 and 75 basis points in the second half of 2025 resulted in lower interest income earned on deposits in other financial institutions, fed fund sold/resale agreements, and loans; however, the decline was in part offset by the accretion income from the net purchase accounting discounts on acquired loans and by the downward repricing of interest-bearing deposits consistent with market rates, resulting in lower interest expense on interest-bearing deposits. The cost on total interest-bearing liabilities during the year ended December 31, 20242025 was 3.18%,2.57%, a 7461 basis point increasedecrease from 2.44%3.18% for the same 2024 period. Accretion income from the net purchase accounting discounts on acquired loans was $19.1 million and the net amortization expense from the purchase accounting discounts on acquired subordinated debt and time deposit premium impact on interest expense was $2.0 million, the combination of which increased the net interest margin by 46 basis points for the year ended 2023.December 31, 2025. Accretion income from the net purchase accounting discounts on acquired loans increased the yield on average total loans by 63 basis points for the year ended December 31, 2025. Accretion income from the net purchase accounting discounts on acquired loans was $10.4 million and the net amortization expense from the purchase accounting discounts on acquired subordinated debt and time deposit premium impact on interest expense was $750 thousand, the combination of which increased the net interest margin by 34 basis points for the year ended December 31, 2024. Accretion income from the net purchase accounting discounts on acquired loans increased the yield on average total loans by 43 basis points for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Total cost of funds for the year ended December 31, 20242025 was 2.12%,1.66%, ana increasedecrease of 6646 basis points from 1.46%2.12% for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The increasedecrease was primarily driven by a 7564 basis point increasedecrease in the cost of average interest-bearing deposits,deposits and a decrease in average total borrowings, coupled with an increase in average interest-bearingnoninterest-bearing deposits.deposits, partially offset by an increase in average cost of total borrowings. Average noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased $91.7$319.2 million to $893.6$1.21 millionbillion and represented 34.1%35.9% of total average deposits for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, compared with $801.9$893.6 million and 40.8%,34.1%, respectively, for the yearsame ended2024 2023period; average interest-bearing deposits increased $564.9$434.4 million to $1.73$2.16 billion during the year ended December 31, 2024.2025. The total cost of deposits for the year ended December 31, 20242025 was 2.01%,1.55%, updown 6446 basis points from 1.37%2.01% for the yearsame ended2024 2023.period.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
There were no material changes to the Company’s risk factors described under Item 1A. “Risk Factors” disclosed in Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, filed with the SEC on March 13, 2026.
No wording changes found in this section.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “(4)Annualized net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.”
New heading “(5)Total deposits is the sum of interest-bearing deposits and noninterest-bearing deposits. The cost of deposits is calculated as annualized total interest expense on deposits divided by average total deposits.”
New heading “(6)Total funding is the sum of total interest-bearing liabilities and noninterest-bearing deposits. The cost of total funding is calculated as annualized total interest expense divided by average total funding.”
New heading “(1)Total loans are net of deferred loan origination fees/costs and discounts/premiums, and include average balances of loans held for sale and nonperforming loans. Interest income includes accretion of net deferred loan fees and net discounts on acquired loans of $7.9 million and $11.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.”
New heading “(2)Tax-exempt debt securities yields are presented on a tax equivalent basis using a 21% tax rate.”
New heading “(3)Average noninterest-bearing deposits represent 35.81%, and 36.80% of average total deposits for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.”
Largest changes
On a quarterly basis, we evaluated numerous key macroeconomic variables within the economic forecast scenarios from Moody’s Analytics and determined that it was best to use a combination of these scenarios that would reflect the range of possible outcomes given the volatile economic environment. We also reviewed the underlying assumptions supporting each scenario along with other sources of economic forecasts and meeting minutes of the FOMC when determining the scenario weighting. Atsee in full comparisonMarchJune31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, we used a probability-weighted two-scenario forecast, representing a baseline scenario and one downside scenario, to estimate the ACL. AtMarchJune 30, 2026 and December 31,2026,2025, wealso updatedused the scenario weightings and assigned70%80% to the baseline scenario and30%20% to the downside scenario,comparedbasedtoprimarily80%onbaselineMoody’s June 2026 forecasts, supplemented by other economic outlooks and20%FOMC guidance. Compared with Moody’s March 2026, its June 2026 forecast reflected a more adverse outlook characterized by slower GDP growth, higher inflation, no expected Federal Reserve rate cuts, and a prolonged higher-for-longer interest rate environment. While the Moody’s S2 downside scenarioatshiftedDecembertoward31,a2025,morebased on the FOMC holding the federal funds rate unchanged in the March 2026 meetingstagflationary andemphasizingprolongedthatrecessionpolicyprofile,will remain restrictive until there is clearer progress on inflations, reinforcing a “higher for longer” stance. The Fed raised its 2026 inflation forecast to 2.7%, reflecting persistent price pressures tied to higher oil prices, tariffs, and geopolitical disruptions, which limit flexibility to ease policy. By comparison, Moody’s baseline forecast expected two rate cuts in 2026 in June and September by 25 basis points each, which appeared optimistic relative to current policy signals. In March 2026, wemanagement concluded thatMoody’sthe baseline scenariois overly optimistic across several key assumptions. The official GDP revisions indicated a weaker starting point thanremained theimpliedmostMoody’slikelyMarchoutcome following the FOMC’s June 2026baselinedecisionforecast.toInmaintainaddition,interestMoody’s March 2026 baseline forecast also underestimated the duration and severity of the US-Iran conflict, and hence its economic impact.rates. We opt to utilize solely the base-case scenario for the ACL model; however, givenrecenttheheightenedongoingdomesticuncertaintyandsurrounding inflation, tariffs, geopoliticaluncertainty, uncertainty around the new administration and tariff policy, a rising inflation level that is still considerably above the Fed’s 2.0% target rate,risks, and slowingGDPeconomicgrowth projection,growth, we believe it is prudent to assign a weighting to a downside scenario (S2) that considers the potential for rising inflation. Inflation is a difficult economic variable to predict, as it is subject to a variety of factors and there are limited tools to control it. Incorporating the S2 scenario in our ACL model provides a hedge against the potential for increasing inflation in an uncertain economic environment. During the second quarter of 2026, California-specific forecasts generally became more pessimistic, particularly for GSP, construction activity, and interest rates, which are expected to increase ACL pressure, while changes in other key economic variables had a mixed impact on the reserve estimate.
“Since mid‑2025, U.S. trade policy has continued to evolve, including the termination of certain emergency tariffs, the implementation of temporary broad‑based tariffs, and adjustments to sector‑specific duties. In addition, ongoing geopolitical tensions in the Middle East have increased energy price volatility and may contribute to inflationary pressures, interest rate uncertainty, and indirect credit risks. …”see in full comparison
“At its March 18, 2026, meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee maintained the federal funds rate in a target range of 3.50% to 3.75% amid uncertainty related to geopolitical developments in the Middle East, lagged inflation data following recent energy price increases, and mixed labor market indicators. The Fed indicated they still expect to cut their key rate once in 2026, the same projection as in December 2025. …”see in full comparison
Total noninterest expense for thesee in full comparisonfirstsecond quarter of 2026 was$25.5$24.3 million, a decrease of$2.4$1.2 million from total noninterest expense of$27.9$25.5 million in the prior quarter. Salaries and employee benefitsincreaseddecreased$136$1.0thousandmillion during thefirstsecond quarter of 2026 to$16.6$15.5 million primarily as a result of the previous quarter including increases in payroll taxes typically occurring in the first quarter each year,partiallycoupledoffsetwithbytheaincrease in loan origination costs deferred based on increased loan origination activity. The decrease inseveranceothercostsexpensescomparedof $424 thousand was due primarily to thepriordecreasesquarter.in loan related expenses and valuation write-downs on loans held for sale. There were nosimilarvaluationseverancewrite-downscostson loans held for sale in thecurrentsecondquarter. Additionally, the decrease in litigation settlementsquarter of$2.02026,millioncomparedinwiththe$266first quarter was primarily due to the recording of non-recurring litigation settlements of $2.0 millionthousand in the prior quarter.
“(1)Total loans are net of deferred loan origination fees/costs and discounts/premiums, and include average balances of loans held for sale and nonperforming loans. Interest income includes accretion of net deferred loan fees and net discounts on acquired loans of $7.9 million and $11.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.”see in full comparison
“Overall, the latest market information supports continued caution in the economic outlook. While economic growth remains resilient and California output has continued to outperform the national economy, inflation and interest-rate uncertainty have increased since the March 2026 forecast, driven primarily by energy-price volatility, tariff and supply-chain developments, and geopolitical risks. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (172)
California BanCorp is a California corporation incorporated on October 2, 2019, and headquartered in Del Mar, California. On May 15, 2020, we completed a reorganization whereby California Bank of Commerce, N.A. became the wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. California Bank of Commerce, N.A. has a wholly owned subsidiary, BCAL OREO1, LLC, which was incorporatedformed on February 14, 2024. BCAL OREO1, LLC is used for holding other real estate owned and other assets acquired by foreclosure. We are regulated as a bank holding company by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”). The Bank operates under a national charter and is regulated by the Office of Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”).
At its June 17, 2026 meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) maintained the federal funds target range at 3.50% to 3.75%, reaffirming its objective of maintaining ample reserves in the banking system. The FOMC noted that economic activity continued to expand at a solid pace despite elevated uncertainty, including uncertainty related to the conflict in the Middle East, while inflation remained above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target, partly reflecting supply shocks affecting certain sectors, including energy.
The Federal Reserve’s July 2026 Monetary Policy Report reflected a more cautious inflation outlook compared with March 2026. The June 2026 Summary of Economic Projections showed median 2026 real GDP growth of 2.2%, unemployment of 4.3%, PCE inflation of 3.6%, and core PCE inflation of 3.3%. The median projected federal funds rate for year-end 2026 increased to 3.8%, compared with the March 2026 projection of 3.4%, indicating that policymakers no longer appear positioned for near-term easing and are instead focused on persistent inflation risk.
Recent economic commentary from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco noted that the U.S. economy continues to expand at a solid pace, supported by strong business investment in technology equipment and software, while consumer spending has moderated. The same report noted that elevated energy prices have pushed inflation further above the Federal Reserve’s 2% goal, although they have had limited impact on overall economic activity to date. The most recent PCE inflation data cited in that report showed headline PCE inflation at 4.1% in May 2026, with inflation risks remaining mainly to the upside.
In California, the UCLA Anderson Forecast released in March 2026 indicated that the state’s economic output continued to outpace the national economy, supported by high-productivity sectors such as artificial intelligence and aerospace. However, the forecast also noted ongoing employment weakness, with unemployment remaining above 5% and payroll growth lagging output growth, reflecting a bifurcated state economy. The forecast projected California unemployment to average 5.6% in 2026, decline to 4.8% in 2027, and improve further to 4.4% in 2028, while total employment growth was expected to strengthen from 0.9% in 2026 to 1.8% in 2027 and 2.1% in 2028.
Overall, the latest market information supports continued caution in the economic outlook. While economic growth remains resilient and California output has continued to outperform the national economy, inflation and interest-rate uncertainty have increased since the March 2026 forecast, driven primarily by energy-price volatility, tariff and supply-chain developments, and geopolitical risks. Management has not observed a material impact on client operations from these events to date, but continues to monitor evolving conditions, including their potential effects on borrower cash flows, collateral values, interest-rate sensitivity, and broader credit risk.
At its March 18, 2026, meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee maintained the federal funds rate in a target range of 3.50% to 3.75% amid uncertainty related to geopolitical developments in the Middle East, lagged inflation data following recent energy price increases, and mixed labor market indicators. The Fed indicated they still expect to cut their key rate once in 2026, the same projection as in December 2025. By keeping their forecast for a rate cut in 2026 and 2027, policymakers appear to expect that the spike in energy prices from the US-Iran conflict will have a transitory effect on inflation and the economy. The Fed released updated economic projections, indicating slightly higher inflation this year compared to its December 2025 forecast. Officials now project inflation to reach 2.7% by the end of 2026, up from the prior estimate of 2.4%. At the press conference, Chairman Powell noted that the economy has sailed through recent headwinds with resilience, and added that he believes the economy is "doing pretty well," despite the uncertainty around inflation, the US-Iran conflict and the job market.
The Fed also announced it will increase the System Open Market Account holdings of securities through purchases of Treasury bills and, if needed, other Treasury securities with remaining maturities of three years or less to maintain an ample level of reserves. Such purchase program is meant to ensure stability in financial markets.
Since mid‑2025, U.S. trade policy has continued to evolve, including the termination of certain emergency tariffs, the implementation of temporary broad‑based tariffs, and adjustments to sector‑specific duties. In addition, ongoing geopolitical tensions in the Middle East have increased energy price volatility and may contribute to inflationary pressures, interest rate uncertainty, and indirect credit risks. While tariff levels remain elevated in certain categories and energy prices have added uncertainty to the economic environment, we have not observed a material impact on client operations from those events and continue to monitor evolving conditions.
In California, overall consumer prices are predicted to peak around 3.5% to 3.6% in early 2026 with annual average unemployment remaining above 5% and peak at 5.6% in 2026 then fall to 4.8% in 2027, according to the UCLA Anderson Forecast released on March 4, 2026. The forecast estimated California’s fourth-quarter GDP growth at 3.8% annualized, well above the initial 1.4% U.S. GDP estimate. The state has now grown faster than the nation for four consecutive quarters.
Moody’s anticipates GDP growth in California to grow to 2.3%1.88% in 2026 and to have a slight decrease to 1.5%1.64% in 2027. The state has shiftedmoved back up to the position of the world’s fifth-largestfourth-largest economy, following a decline from its previous fourth-placefifth-place ranking. California’s economy is cooling off, with slower payroll growth and downward revisions widening the gap with national trends. Challenges in the tech sector are expected to persist amid ongoing uncertainty. Ongoing trade‑related uncertainty and heightened geopolitical tensions have contributed to a more cautious business and investment environment. We have observed that some clients are delaying or reassessing the timing of certain projects amid continued economic uncertainty.
We have a strong consolidated balance sheet with diversified deposit and loan portfolios, with very little sector or individual customer concentration, other than our CRE concentration. Our relationship-based business banking model is founded on strong, ongoing relationships with our commercial clients, which represent a broad variety of industries. We have no meaningful exposure to cryptocurrency or venture capital business models, our accumulated other comprehensive loss on our available-for-sale debt securities is manageable, and our capital position is strong. In 2025 and in the first quarter of 2026, we made significant progress in derisking our consolidated balance sheets, reducing our exposure in the Sponsor Finance portfolio, eliminating our reliance on brokered deposits and improving overall credit quality.
Per the regulatory definition of commercial real estate, at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our concentration of such loans represented 450%449% of our total risk-based capital. In addition, at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, total loans secured by commercial real estate under construction and land development represented 27%25% of our total risk-based capital. The non-performing loans for these segments per the regulatory definition of commercial real estate loans at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 were $28.7$5.1 million and there were $5$122 thousand net recoveriescharge-offs during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026. At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, there was $8.6 million of OREO.
Given the nature of our commercial banking business, approximately 50% of our total deposits exceeded the FDIC deposit insurance limits at MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
We strategically manage an investment portfolio focused on high-quality, resilient securities. At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the amortized cost of our held-to-maturity debt securities was $52.8 million, or approximately 1.3% of total assets. The fair value of our available-for-sale debt securities was $298.6$308.8 million, or approximately 7.4%7.7% of total assets. The 10-Year Treasury Bond was approximately 4.3%4.4% at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to 4.2% at December 31, 2025. The increase in the 10-Year Treasury Bond in 2026, resulted in higher net unrealized losses on our debt securities at MarchJune 31,30, 2026. At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes, increased to $3.8$5.3 million, compared to $1.6 million at December 31, 2025. If we realized all of our unrealized losses on both held-to-maturity and available-for-sale debt securities, our losses, net of taxes would be $6.9$7.9 million at MarchJune 31,30, 2026. The results of our stress testing on our debt security portfolio at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, illustrated that our losses, net of taxes on both held-to-maturity and available-for-sale debt securities would increase to $49.3$51.1 million in a 300 basis point rate increase shock scenario. If we realized all of these unrealized losses, the Bank would continue to exceed all regulatory capital requirements necessary to be considered well capitalized.
(4) Return on average assets is computed by dividing annualized net income by average assets. Return on average equity is computed by dividing net income by average shareholders’ equity.
Net income for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was $14.3 million, or $0.44 per diluted share, compared with $13.8 million, or $0.42 per diluted share, compared with $16.4 million, or $0.50 per diluted share in the fourthfirst quarter of 2025.2026. Pre-tax, pre-provision income (non-GAAP) for the firstsecond quarter was $18.7$20.6 million, an increase of $717$1.9 thousandmillion from the prior quarter. The $2.6$509 millionthousand decreaseincrease in net income and $0.08$0.02 decreaseincrease in diluted earnings per share were largely driven by a $4.0$1.3 million decrease in reversal of provision for credit losses, an $821 thousand decreaseincrease in net interest income and $858 thousand decrease in thelower noninterest income,expense of $1.2 million, partially offset by a lower$1.1 million increase in provision for credit losses and a $586 thousand decrease in noninterest expense of $2.4 million.income.
Net income for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $13.8$14.3 million, or $0.42$0.44 per diluted share, compared with $16.9$14.1 million, or $0.52$0.43 per diluted share for the same 2025 period. Pre-tax, pre-provision income (non-GAAP) for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was $18.7$20.6 million, aan decreaseincrease of $1.2$1.1 million from the same 2025 period. The $3.1$201 millionthousand decreaseincrease in net income and $0.10$0.01 decreaseincrease in diluted earnings per share were primarily driven by a $3.4$1.9 million decrease in the reversal of provision for credit losses, a $171 thousand decreaseincrease in the net interest income and $429$487 thousand decrease in noninterest expense, and a lower weighted-average diluted share count from the share repurchase program, partially offset by a $1.3 million increase in the provision for credit losses and a $1.3 million decrease in the noninterest income, coupled with a $592 thousand increase in noninterest expense.income.
Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was $28.1 million, or $0.86 per diluted share, compared to $31.0 million, or $0.95 per diluted share in the prior year. Pre-tax, pre-provision income for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was $39.3 million, a decrease of $73 thousand compared to pre-tax, pre-provision income for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The $2.9 million decrease in net income and $0.08 decrease in diluted earnings per share from the prior year was primarily due to a $4.7 million increase in the provision for credit losses, a $1.7 million decrease in noninterest income and a $105 thousand increase in noninterest expense, partially offset by a $1.8 million increase in net interest income and a $2.0 million decrease in income taxes, and a lower weighted-average diluted share count from the share repurchase program.
(1)Total loans are net of deferred loan origination fees/costs and discounts/premiums, and include average balances of loans held for sale and nonperforming loans. Interest income includes accretion of net deferred loan fees and net discounts on acquired loans of $3.9 million, $4.4$3.9 million and $6.1$5.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, March 31, 2026, December 31, 2025, and MarchJune 31,30, 2025, respectively.
(3)Average noninterest-bearing deposits represent 34.95%,36.70%, 35.39%34.95% and 37.37%36.21% of average total deposits for the three months ended June 30, 2026, March 31, 2026, December 31, 2025, and MarchJune 31,30, 2025, respectively.
(4)Annualized net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
(5)Total deposits is the sum of interest-bearing deposits and noninterest-bearing deposits. The cost of deposits is calculated as annualized total interest expense on deposits divided by average total deposits.
(6)Total funding is the sum of total interest-bearing liabilities and noninterest-bearing deposits. The cost of total funding is calculated as annualized total interest expense divided by average total funding.
(1)Total loans are net of deferred loan origination fees/costs and discounts/premiums, and include average balances of loans held for sale and nonperforming loans. Interest income includes accretion of net deferred loan fees and net discounts on acquired loans of $7.9 million and $11.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
(2)Tax-exempt debt securities yields are presented on a tax equivalent basis using a 21% tax rate.
(3)Average noninterest-bearing deposits represent 35.81%, and 36.80% of average total deposits for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Net interest income for the second quarter of 2026 was $43.4 million, compared with $42.1 million in the prior quarter. The increase in net interest income was primarily due to a $1.1 million increase in total interest and dividend income, coupled with a $123 thousand decrease in total interest expense in the second quarter of 2026, as compared with the prior quarter. The increase in net interest income was also impacted by one additional day in the current quarter than the prior quarter.
Net interest income forDuring the first quarter of 2026 was $42.1 million, compared with $42.9 million in the prior quarter. The decrease in net interest income was primarily due to a $2.4 million decrease in total interest and dividend income, partially offset by a $1.6 million decrease in total interest expense in the firstsecond quarter of 2026, as compared with the prior quarter. The decrease in nettotal interest income was also impactedincreased by two$1.1 fewermillion. daysThe increase was primarily driven by a $2.3 million increase in the current quarter than the prior quarter. During the first quarter of 2026, loan interest incomeincome, decreasedwhich byincluded $1.8an million, including a decreaseincrease of $575$98 thousand in accretion from the net purchase accounting discounts on acquired loans and a$600 reversalthousand in cash interest collections from the payoff of two nonaccrual loans’loans, net of $56 thousand in reversals of interest income ofon $479loans thousand,placed on nonaccrual, coupled with an increase of $749 thousand in total debt securities income. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $1.4$1.7 million in interest income from deposits in other financial institutions,institutions partiallyand offseta by an increasedecrease of $375 thousand in total debt securities income and an increase of $367$225 thousand in dividend income from restricted stock investments and other bank stock. The decreaseincrease in interest income was mainly due to a ten25 basis point decreaseincrease in the yield on average total interest-earning assetsassets, including increases in average total loans of $23.6 million, and aaverage decreasetotal debt securities of $49.4 million, offset by decreases in average deposits in other financial institutions of $88.9 million, partially offset by increases in average total loans of $32.3 million, average total debt securities of $35.3$195.9 million and average Fed funds sold/resale agreements of $8.0$4.1 million. The decrease in interest expense for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was primarily due to a $1.6$119 millionthousand decrease in interest expense on average total interest-bearing deposits, the result of alower 23average total interest-bearing deposits of $132.4 million, partially offset by an 8 basis point decreaseincrease in the cost of average total interest-bearing deposits, coupled with a $7.4 million decrease in average total interest-bearing deposits.
Net interest margin for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was 4.47%,4.71%, compared with 4.44%4.47% in the prior quarter. The increaseexpansion of the net interest margin by 24 basis points was primarily relateddriven toby thehigher 14loan yields, a 6 basis point decreaseincrease from the resolution of certain nonaccrual loans, and continued benefit from purchase accounting accretion. Total interest-earning assets yield increased by 25 basis points, partially offset by a 2 basis point increase in the cost of funds outpacing the ten basis point decrease in the total interest-earning assets yield.funds. The yield on total average interest-earning assets in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was 5.72%,5.97%, compared with 5.82%5.72% in the prior quarter. The yield on average total loans in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was 6.14%,6.34%, aan decreaseincrease of 1720 basis points from 6.31%6.14% in the prior quarter. The yield on average total loans in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 included the impact of the reversalcash interest collection from the payoff of two nonaccrual loan interest, net of reversals of interest income on loans placed on nonaccrual noted above, which decreasedincreased the overall loan yield by six7 basis points. There was noa significant$479 thousand reversal of interest income in the prior quarter.quarter which negatively impacted the net interest margin by 6 basis points. Accretion income from the net purchase accounting discounts on acquired loans was $3.3 million, increasing the yield on average total loans by 44 basis points; the net amortization expense from the purchase accounting discounts on acquired subordinated debt and acquired time deposits premium increased interest expense by $389 thousand, the combination of which increased the net interest margin by 32 basis points in the second quarter of 2026. In the prior quarter, accretion income from the net purchase accounting discounts on acquired loans was $3.2 million, increasing the yield on average total loans by 44 basis points; the net amortization expense from the purchase accounting discounts on acquired subordinated debt and acquired time deposits premium increased the interest expense by $388 thousand, the combination of which increased the net interest margin by 30 basis points in the first quarter of 2026. In the prior quarter, accretion income from the net purchase accounting discounts on acquired loans was $3.8 million, increasing the yield on average total loans by 51 basis points; the net amortization expense from the purchase accounting discounts on acquired subordinated debt and acquired time deposits premium increased the interest expense by $389 thousand, the combination of which increased the net interest margin by 36 basis points.
Cost of funds for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was 1.36%,1.38%, aan decreaseincrease of 142 basis points from 1.50%1.36% in the prior quarter. The decreaseincrease was primarily driven by 23an 8 basis point decreaseincrease in the cost of average total interest-bearing deposits. The amortization expense of $389 thousand from the purchase accounting discounts on acquired subordinated debt and acquired time deposits premium contributed five basis points to the cost of funds. Average noninterest-bearing demand deposits decreasedincreased $27.4$18.6 million to $1.21$1.22 billion and represented 34.9%36.7% of total average deposits for the firstsecond quarter of 2026, compared with $1.23$1.21 billion and 35.4%,34.9%, respectively, in the prior quarter; average interest-bearing deposits decreased $7.4$132.4 million to $2.24$2.11 billion during the firstsecond quarter of 2026. The total cost of deposits in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was 1.29%,1.31%, compared with 1.43%1.29% in the prior quarter. The cost of total interest-bearing deposits decreasedincreased 238 basis points, driven primarily by the Company’s ongoing deposit pricing and mix strategychanges in the firstCompany’s deposit mix and overall competition for deposits driving market deposit rates upward in the second quarter of 2026.
Average total borrowings increased $674$51 thousand to $34.4 million in the firstsecond quarter of 2026, primarily due to a $304$384 thousand increase in average subordinated debt due to accretion of discounts, partially offset by a $333 thousand decrease in average Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances andfrom $370an thousandovernight increase in average subordinated debt due to accretion of discounts.advance. The average cost of total borrowings was 8.25%8.10% for the firstsecond quarter of 2026, updown from 8.19%8.25% in the prior quarter.
Net interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2026 was $43.4 million, compared with $41.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The increase in net interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2026 was primarily due to a $1.8 million increase in interest on debt securities and $2.8 million decrease in total interest expense, partially offset by a $1.1 million decrease in total loan interest income and $1.5 million decrease in interest and dividend income from other financial institutions.
Comparing to the same 2025 period, total interest income decreased by $854 thousand. The decrease was primarily driven by a $1.1 million decrease in loan interest income, which included a decrease of $1.8 million in accretion from the net purchase accounting discounts on acquired loans, coupled with a decrease of $1.5 million in interest and dividend income from other financial institutions. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $1.8 million in interest income on debt securities. The decrease in interest income was mainly due to a 24 basis point decrease in the yield on average total interest-earning assets, coupled with decreases in the average deposits in other financial institutions of $64.7 million and average Fed funds sold/resale agreements of $34.9 million, partially offset by increases in average total debt securities of $141.1 million and average total loans of $44.7 million. The decrease in interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2026 was primarily due to a $2.1 million decrease in interest expense on total interest-bearing deposits, coupled with a $734 thousand decrease in interest expense on total borrowings.
Net interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was $42.1 million, compared with $42.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The decrease in net interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was primarily due to a $5.1 million decrease in total loan interest income, partially offset by a $2.9 million decrease in total interest expense, a $1.2 million increase in interest on debt securities and $771 thousand increase in interest and dividend income from other financial institutions. Comparing to the same 2025 period, loan interest income decreased by $5.1 million, including a decrease of $2.4 million in accretion from the net purchase accounting discounts on acquired loans and a lower reversal of nonaccrual loans’ interest income of $336 thousand, partially offset by an increase of $1.2 million in total debt securities income, an increase of $375 thousand in interest income from deposits in other financial institutions, and an increase of $431 thousand in dividend income from restricted stock investments and other bank stock. The decrease in interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was primarily due to a $2.2 million decrease in interest expense on total interest-bearing deposits, coupled with a $692 thousand decrease in interest expense on total borrowings.
Net interest margin for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was 4.47%,4.71%, compared with 4.65%4.61% for the same 2025 period. The 18expansion of the net interest margin by 10 basis point was primarily driven by a 35 basis point decrease was primarily related toin the 54cost of funds, partially offset by the 24 basis pointpoints decrease in the total average interest-earning assets yield resulting from lower accretion income from the net purchase accounting discounts on acquired loans, lower market interest rates and a change in our average interest-earning asset mix, offset by a 36 basis point decrease in the cost of funds.mix. The Federal Reserve’s reductions to the federal funds target rate by 75 basis points in the second half of 2025 resulted in lower interest income earned on deposits in other financial institutions, Fed fund sold/resale agreements, and loans, coupled with the decline in the accretion income from the net purchase accounting discounts on acquired loans, partially offset by the downward repricing of interest-bearing deposits consistent with market rates, resulting in lower interest expense on interest-bearing deposits and the redemptions of subordinated debtsdebt in June 2025 and September 2025, resulting in lower interest expense on total borrowings for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.2026 compared to the same 2025 period.
Average interest-earning assets increased $135.1 million, resulting primarily from a $110.2 million increase in average deposits in other financial institutions, a $116.7 million increase in total average debt securities, and a $4.4 million increase in average Fed funds sold/resale agreements, partially offset by a $96.3 million decrease in average total loans. The yield on total average earning assets during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was 5.72%,5.97%, compared with 6.26%6.21% for the same 2025 period. The yield on average loans decreased 4724 basis points to 6.14%6.34% from 6.61%6.58% year over year. The yield on total debt securities increased to 4.13%4.36% from 4.01%3.93% for the same 2025 period. Accretion income from the net purchase accounting discounts on acquired loans was $3.2$3.3 million, increasing the yield on average total loans by 44 basis pointpoints; the net amortization expense from the purchase accounting discounts on acquired subordinated debt and acquired time deposits premium increased the interest expense by $388$389 thousand, the combination of which increased the net interest margin by 3032 basis points in the firstsecond quarter of 2026. For the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, accretion income from the net purchase accounting discounts on acquired loans was $5.7$5.2 million and the amortization expense impact on interest expense was $526$554 thousand, the combination of which increased the net interest margin by 5751 basis points.
During the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, total interest expense decreased by $2.9$2.8 million to $11.7$11.6 million, comprised primarily of a $2.2$2.1 million decrease in interest expense on interest-bearing deposits primarily due to a decrease in the cost of interest-bearing deposits resulting from our deposit repricing strategy and the ongoing reduction of high cost brokered deposits, partially offset by the increase in average interest-bearing deposits between periods.
Total cost of funds for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was 1.36%,1.38%, a decrease of 3635 basis points from 1.72%1.73% for the same 2025 period. The decrease was primarily driven by a 5543 basis point decrease in the average cost of interest-bearing deposits,deposits partially offset byand a decrease in average noninterest-bearing deposits and by an increase of 1943 basis points in the cost of total borrowings.borrowings, coupled with an increase in average noninterest-bearing deposits. Average noninterest-bearing demand deposits decreasedincreased $50.4$44.2 million to $1.21$1.22 billion and represented 34.95%36.7% of total average deposits for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared with $1.26$1.18 billion and 37.37%,36.2%, respectively, for the same 2025 period; average interest-bearing deposits increased $139.1$33.1 million to $2.24$2.11 billion during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026. The total cost of deposits for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was 1.29%,1.31%, down 3028 basis points from 1.59% for the same 2025 period.
Average total borrowings decreased $35.7$32.7 million to $34.4 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 resulting from a decrease of $36.0$32.7 million in average subordinated debt from the redemption of the $18 million of subordinated debtsdebt in June 2025 and $20 million of subordinated notesdebt in September 2025, partially offset by a $333 thousand increase in average FHLB advances.2025. The average cost of total borrowings was 8.25%8.10% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, a 1943 basis point increasedecrease from 8.06%8.53% for the same 2025 period. The increasedecrease was primarily attributable to amortizationthe redemption of purchasehigher accounting discounts associated with the acquiredyielding subordinated debt.
Net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was $85.4 million, compared to $83.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase in net interest income was primarily due to a $5.7 million decrease in total interest expense, partially offset by a $3.9 million decrease in total interest income.
During the six months ended June 30, 2026, total interest income decreased by $3.9 million. The decrease was primarily driven by a $6.2 million decrease in loan interest income, which included a $4.3 million decrease in accretion income from the net purchase accounting discounts on acquired loans, and higher cash interest collections from the payoffs of nonaccrual loans, net of higher reversals of interest income on loans placed on nonaccrual, coupled with a $743 thousand decrease in interest and dividends from other financial institutions. These decreases were partially offset by a $3.0 million increase in interest on debt securities. The decrease in interest income was primarily driven by lower accretion income coupled with lower market interest rates and a decrease in average total loans, partially offset by the higher average debt securities balances. There was a 40 basis point decrease in yield on the total average interest-earning assets, partially offset by higher total average interest-earning assets balances for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same 2025 period. Total average interest-earning assets increased $110.6 million, which included a $129.0 million increase in total average debt securities, a $22.3 million increase in average deposits in other financial institutions, partially offset by a $25.4 million decrease in average total loans and a $15.3 million decrease in average Fed funds sold/resale agreements.
During the six months ended June 30, 2026, total interest expense decreased by $5.7 million to $23.3 million as compared to the same period in 2025, primarily due to the 49 basis point decrease in the cost of interest-bearing deposits from changes in market interest rates and lower average borrowings of $34.2 million from the redemption of subordinated debt in 2025, partially offset by higher average interest-bearing deposits of $85.8 million between periods.
Net interest margin for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was 4.59%, compared with 4.63% for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease was primarily related to a 40 basis point decrease in the total interest-earning assets yield resulting from lower market interest rates and a change in our interest-earning asset mix, partially offset by a 36 basis point decrease in the cost of funds. The yield on total earning assets during the six months ended June 30, 2026 was 5.84%, compared with 6.24% for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The yield on average total loans during the six months ended June 30, 2026 was 6.24%, a 35 basis point decrease from 6.59% for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The cost on total interest-bearing liabilities during the six months ended June 30, 2026 was 2.12%, a 58 basis point decrease from 2.70% for the same 2025 period. Accretion income from the net purchase accounting discounts on acquired loans was $6.6 million and the amortization expense impact on interest expense was $777 thousand, the combination of which increased the net interest margin by 31 basis points for the six months ended June 30, 2026. Accretion income from the net purchase accounting discounts on acquired loans increased the yield on average total loans by 44 basis points for the six months ended June 30, 2026. Accretion income from the net purchase accounting discounts on acquired loans was $10.8 million and the amortization expense impact on interest expense was $1.1 million, the combination of which increased the net interest margin by 54 basis points for the six months ended June 30, 2025. Accretion income from the net purchase accounting discounts on acquired loans increased the yield on average total loans by 72 basis points for the six months ended June 30, 2025.
Total cost of funds for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was 1.37%, a decrease of 36 basis points from 1.73% for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease was primarily driven by a 49 basis point decrease in the cost of average total interest-bearing deposits, offset by decreases in average noninterest-bearing deposits, average total borrowings and average cost of total borrowings. Average noninterest-bearing demand deposits decreased $2.8 million to $1.21 billion and represented 35.8% of total average deposits for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared with $1.22 billion and 36.8%, respectively, for the same 2025 period; average interest-bearing deposits increased $85.8 million to $2.18 billion during the six months ended June 30, 2026. The total cost of deposits for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was 1.30%, down 29 basis points from 1.59% for the same 2025 period.
Average total borrowings decreased $34.2 million to $34.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, resulting primarily from a $34.4 million decrease in subordinated debt from the redemption of $18 million of subordinated debt in June 2025 and $20 million of subordinated debt in September 2025. The average cost of total borrowings was 8.17% for the six months ended June 30, 2026, a 12 basis point decrease from 8.29% for the same 2025 period. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower borrowing costs associated with the redemption of the higher yielding subordinated debt during 2025.
Reversal of Provision for Credit Losses
The Company recorded a provision for credit losses of $714 thousand for the second quarter of 2026, compared with a reversal of provision for credit losses of $381 thousand for the first quarter of 2026, compared with $4.4 million in the prior quarter. The reversal of provision for credit losses in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was relatedcomprised toof thea ALL.$1.1 Theremillion wasprovision nofor credit losses on loans held for investment, partially offset by a $336 thousand reversal of provision for credit losses for unfunded loan commitments during the firstsecond quarter of 2026. Total unfunded loan commitments increased modestlydecreased by $38.7$28.2 million to $925.1$896.9 million at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $886.4$925.1 million in unfunded loan commitments at DecemberMarch 31, 2025.2026.
The provision for credit losses for loans held for investment in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was a$1.1 reversalmillion, an increase of $381 thousand, a decrease of $3.8$1.4 million from a reversal of provision for credit losses of $4.2$381 millionthousand in the prior quarter. The decreaseincrease wasreflected drivenupdates primarily by the changes into the reasonable and supportable forecast, primarily related to the economic outlookforecasts for California, coupled with a decrease incontinued loan balances,growth, changes in the portfolio mix,composition, and changeshigher insubstandard theaccruing qualitativeloan factors,balances, partially offset by anrefinements increase into the criticizedqualitative loanfactors lossand rates,scenario which are updated annually in the model, despite a decline in criticized loan balances.weighting. The Company’s management continues to monitor macroeconomic variables including changes in interest rates, uncertainty in the current economic environment, and elevated geopolitical risks related to ongoing conflicts in the Middle East. Management believes it has appropriately provisioned for the current environment.
We recorded a reversal of provision for credit losses of $381$714 thousand for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $3.8a millionreversal of credit losses of $634 thousand for the same 2025 period. The reversal of provision for credit losses forin the threesecond monthsquarter ended March 31,of 2025 included a $3.2 million reversal of provision for credit losses on loans held for investment and a $618$29 thousand reversal of provision for credit losses for unfunded loan commitments,commitments primarily duerelated to the decreaseincrease in unfunded loan commitments during the firstsecond quarter of 2025, coupledpartially withoffset lowerby lossa ratesdecrease andin average funding rates used to estimate the allowance for credit losses on unfunded commitments, despite total unfunded loan commitments increasing modestly by $33.1 million to $925.1 million at March 31, 2026, compared to $892.1 million in unfunded loan commitments at March 31, 2025.commitments.
Total unfunded loan commitments decreasing modestly by $4.3 million to $896.9 million at June 30, 2026, compared to $901.2 million in unfunded loan commitments at June 30, 2025.
The reversal of provision for credit losses for the loans held for investments for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 was driven primarily by the decrease in the balance of loans held for investment, changes in the composition of the loans held for investment portfolio, coupled with changes in qualitative factorsfactors, partially offset by net charge-offs and changes in the reasonable and supportable forecast, primarily related to the economic outlook for California.
We recorded a provision for credit losses of $333 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to a reversal of provision for credit losses of $4.4 million for the same 2025 period. Total net charge-offs were $157 thousand in the six months ended June 30, 2026, which consisted of $193 thousand of gross charge-offs, partially offset by $36 thousand of gross recoveries. The net charge-offs resulted from the Company’s continuing strategy to derisk the consolidated balance sheet by reducing our exposure to criticized loans. The provision for credit losses in the six months ended June 30, 2026 included a $336 thousand reversal of provision for credit losses for unfunded loan commitments primarily related to the decreases in the loss rate used to estimate the allowance for credit losses on unfunded commitments during the six months ended June 30, 2026, partially offset by the increase in unfunded loan commitments of $10.5 million to $896.9 million at June 30, 2026 from $886.4 million at December 31, 2025.
The provision for credit losses for loans held for investment in the six months ended June 30, 2026 was $669 thousand, compared with a reversal of provision for credit losses of $3.8 million in the same 2025 period. The increase reflected updates to the reasonable and supportable economic forecasts for California, continued loan growth, changes in portfolio composition, and higher substandard accruing loan balances, partially offset by refinements to the qualitative factors and scenario weighting.
We recorded a reversal of credit losses of $4.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The reversal of credit losses for the six months ended June 30, 2025 included a $3.8 million reversal of credit losses on loans held for investment and a $589 thousand reversal credit losses for unfunded loan commitments. The reversal of provision for credit losses on loans held for investment for the six months ended June 30, 2025 was primarily due a decrease in the balance of loans held for investment, changes in the composition of the loans held for investment portfolio, and changes in qualitative factors, partially offset by the net charge-offs and changes in the reasonable and supportable forecast, primarily related to the economic outlook for California. The reversal of credit losses on unfunded loan commitments for the six months ended June 30, 2025 was primarily due to the decreases in unfunded loan commitments and loss rate used to estimate the allowance for credit losses on unfunded commitments during the six months ended June 30, 2025.
Total noninterest income was $1.6 million in the second quarter of 2026, a decrease of $586 thousand compared with $2.1 million in the first quarter of 2026. Other charges and fees decreased $534 thousand in the second quarter due primarily to a loss from equity investments of $251 thousand in the second quarter of 2026, compared to income of $181 thousand in the prior quarter.
Total noninterest income was $1.6 million in the second quarter of 2026, a decrease of $1.3 million compared with $2.9 million in the second quarter of 2025. The decrease was due primarily to a $1.2 million decrease in other charges and fees due primarily to lower income from equity investments of $1.2 million and lower interchange and ATM income between periods.
Total noninterest income during the six months ended June 30, 2026 was $3.7 million, a decrease of $1.7 million compared to total noninterest income of $5.4 million for the same period in the prior year. The decrease was primarily the result of decreases of $923 thousand in other charges and fees due to lower income from equity investments, and $577 thousand in gain on sale of loans in 2025. We recorded a $70 thousand loss from our equity investments for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $918 thousand of income from our equity investments for the same 2025 period.
There was no gain on sale of loans during the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $577 thousand for the same 2025 period. In the same 2025 period, we sold eight SBA 7(a) loans with a net carrying value of $9.0 million, resulting in a gain on sale of $577 thousand at an average premium of 6.44%.
Total noninterest income was $2.1 million in the first quarter of 2026, a decrease of $858 thousand compared with $3.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2025. Other charges and fees decreased $820 thousand in the first quarter due primarily to lower income from equity investments of $181 thousand in the first quarter compared to $948 thousand in the prior quarter Total noninterest income was $2.1 million in the first quarter of 2026, a decrease of $429 thousand compared with $2.6 million in the first quarter of 2025. The decrease was due primarily to there being no gain on sale of loans compared to $577 thousand in the comparable quarter in 2025, partially offset by a $243 thousand increase in other charges and fees due primarily to a higher income from equity investments and higher miscellaneous income.
BCAL insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 1 Form 4 filing (1 insider, 1 trade date, 450 shares, about $10.0K) and open-market sales in 3 filings (3 insiders, 3 trade dates, 99,500 shares, about $1.9M). Net open-market shares: -99,050 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$1.9M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-21 | Wirfel Michelle |
Shares withheld for tax | 93 | $21.51 | $2.0K |
| 2026-09-04 | Muller Frank L. |
Open-market purchase | 450 | $22.13 | $10.0K |
| 2026-08-20 | Cullen Kevin J. |
Grant/award | 1,025 | — | — |
| 2026-08-20 | Armanino Andrew J. |
Grant/award | 1,025 | — | — |
| 2026-08-20 | Cortese Stephen A. |
Grant/award | 1,025 | — | — |
| 2026-08-11 | Dolan Thomas G. |
Other | 3,352 | — | — |
| 2026-08-11 | Dolan Thomas G. |
Other | 3,352 | — | — |
| 2026-08-11 | Liska Martin |
Other | 1,257 | — | — |
| 2026-08-11 | Liska Martin |
Other | 1,257 | — | — |
| 2026-08-02 | Dolan Thomas G. |
Shares withheld for tax | 1,877 | $21.30 | $40.0K |
| 2026-08-02 | Liska Martin |
Shares withheld for tax | 704 | $21.30 | $15.0K |
| 2026-08-02 | Nutz Peter |
Shares withheld for tax | 939 | $21.30 | $20.0K |
| 2026-08-02 | Merchant Manisha |
Shares withheld for tax | 939 | $21.30 | $20.0K |
| 2026-08-02 | Wirfel Michelle |
Shares withheld for tax | 1,407 | $21.30 | $30.0K |
| 2026-08-02 | Yeung Joann |
Shares withheld for tax | 704 | $21.30 | $15.0K |
| 2026-08-02 | Rainer David I |
Shares withheld for tax | 3,518 | $21.30 | $74.9K |
| 2026-08-02 | Hernandez Richard |
Shares withheld for tax | 1,407 | $21.30 | $30.0K |
| 2026-08-02 | Carandang Jean |
Shares withheld for tax | 704 | $21.30 | $15.0K |
| 2026-07-31 | Machado Lester |
Option exercise | 7,500 | $12.96 | $97.2K |
| 2026-07-31 | Machado Lester |
Other | 9,142 | — | — |
| 2026-07-31 | Machado Lester |
Other | 9,142 | — | — |
| 2026-07-31 | Machado Lester |
Open-market sale | 7,500 | $21.19 | $158.9K |
| 2026-06-21 | Wirfel Michelle |
Shares withheld for tax | 93 | $19.74 | $1.8K |
| 2026-06-08 | Carandang Jean |
Shares withheld for tax | 1,185 | $19.39 | $23.0K |
| 2026-06-01 | Armanino Andrew J. |
Grant/award | 3,196 | — | — |
| 2026-06-01 | Cortese Stephen A. |
Grant/award | 3,196 | — | — |
| 2026-06-01 | Volk David J. |
Grant/award | 3,196 | — | — |
| 2026-06-01 | Cullen Kevin J. |
Grant/award | 3,196 | — | — |
| 2026-06-01 | Di Tomaso Frank |
Grant/award | 3,196 | — | — |
| 2026-06-01 | Williams Anne A |
Grant/award | 3,196 | — | — |
| 2026-06-01 | Muller Frank L. |
Grant/award | 3,196 | — | — |
| 2026-06-01 | Machado Lester |
Grant/award | 3,196 | — | — |
| 2026-06-01 | Klein Rochelle G. |
Grant/award | 3,196 | — | — |
| 2026-05-21 | Cullen Kevin J. |
Grant/award | 1,040 | — | — |
| 2026-05-21 | Cortese Stephen A. |
Grant/award | 1,040 | — | — |
| 2026-05-21 | Armanino Andrew J. |
Grant/award | 1,040 | — | — |
| 2026-05-08 | Hernandez Richard |
Open-market sale | 17,000 | $19.12 | $325.0K |
| 2026-05-07 | Rainer David I |
Open-market sale | 75,000 | $19.00 | $1.4M |
| 2026-05-05 | Hernandez Richard |
Shares withheld for tax | 1,208 | $18.85 | $22.8K |
| 2026-04-28 | Wirfel Michelle |
Shares withheld for tax | 115 | $18.92 | $2.2K |
| 2026-04-20 | Nutz Peter |
Shares withheld for tax | 143 | $18.76 | $2.7K |
| 2026-04-15 | Dolan Thomas G. |
Other | 5,114 | — | — |
| 2026-04-15 | Dolan Thomas G. |
Other | 5,114 | — | — |
| 2026-04-12 | Wirfel Michelle |
Shares withheld for tax | 154 | $18.38 | $2.8K |
| 2026-04-10 | Liska Martin |
Other | 3,674 | — | — |
| 2026-04-10 | Liska Martin |
Other | 3,674 | — | — |
| 2026-01-16 | Di Tomaso Frank |
Other | 13 | $18.89 | $252 |
| 2026-01-16 | Williams Anne A |
Other | 26 | $18.89 | $488 |
| 2026-01-16 | Muller Frank L. |
Other | 28 | $18.89 | $537 |
| 2026-01-16 | Machado Lester |
Other | 29 | $18.89 | $539 |
| 2026-01-16 | Klein Rochelle G. |
Other | 28 | $18.89 | $537 |
Well-known investors holding BCAL (13F)
None of the 59 investors we track reported a position in their latest 13F.