CACI 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Caci International Inc. · NYSE · Services-Computer Integrated Systems Design · CIK 16058 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “We use estimates in recognizing revenues, and changes in those estimates may adversely affect our financial results.”
New heading “We may incur additional indebtedness, which could impact our ability to service our debts.”
New heading “Disruptions in our supply chain, including shortages of materials, components, or qualified suppliers, could impair our ability to perform on contracts and increase our costs, which could adversely affect our operating results.”
New heading “Cybersecurity and Unauthorized Access”
New heading “Operational, Infrastructure, and Other Non-Cyber Systems Failures”
New heading “Our integration of artificial intelligence and related technologies subjects us to operational and regulatory risks, and our failure to effectively manage these risks could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.”
Removed heading “Our business could be adversely affected by delays caused by our competitors protesting major contract awards received by us, resulting in the delay of the initiation of work.”
Removed heading “Our federal government contracts may be terminated by the government at any time and may contain other provisions permitting the government not to continue with contract performance, and if lost contracts are not replaced, our operating results may differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.”
Removed heading “Restrictions on or other changes to the federal government’s use of service contracts may harm our operating results.”
Removed heading “Without additional Congressional appropriations, some of the contracts included in our backlog will remain unfunded, which could materially and adversely affect our future operating results.”
Removed heading “Despite our outstanding debt, we may incur additional indebtedness.”
Largest changes
“We work with a network of suppliers and subcontractors to provide materials, hardware, software, and other critical components necessary to perform on our contracts, and disruptions, including shortages of specialized parts, supplier capacity constraints, transportation delays, labor shortages, or the financial instability of key vendors, could impair our ability to meet customer requirements. …”see in full comparison
“The federal government may delay payment of invoices for several reasons, including lack of appropriated funds, delays in the budget or appropriations process, or other funding constraints. We are also subject to audits or oversight activities by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) which has the authority to revoke our direct-billing privileges and contracting officers who may impose contractual withholdings, including those required under the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulations when a contractor’s business systems are found to have a material weakness. …”see in full comparison
“Our integration of artificial intelligence and related technologies subjects us to operational and regulatory risks, and our failure to effectively manage these risks could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.”see in full comparison
“Disruptions in our supply chain, including shortages of materials, components, or qualified suppliers, could impair our ability to perform on contracts and increase our costs, which could adversely affect our operating results.”see in full comparison
“We rely on the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of our information systems, the systems of our third-party service providers, and the systems we operate for customers. Cybersecurity incidents, including malware, ransomware, phishing campaigns, credential compromise, and other unauthorized intrusions, could result in the loss, corruption, or exposure of data or disruptions to our operations or those of our customers. Consistent with industry trends, we continue to experience attempts to gain unauthorized access to our systems and information. …”see in full comparison
“Because we derive substantially all of our revenues from contracts with the federal government, we believe that the success and development of our business will continue to depend on our successful participation in federal government contract programs. Changes in federal government budgetary priorities, such as for homeland security or to address global pandemics, or actions taken to address government budget deficits, the national debt, or prevailing economic conditions, could directly affect our financial performance. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (79)
The federal government is our primary customer, with revenues from federal government contracts, either as a prime contractor or a subcontractor, accounting for 95.7%95.6% and 95.1%95.7% of our total revenues in fiscal 20252026 and 2024,2025, respectively. Specifically, we generated 75.4%53.6% and 74.4%53.5% of our total revenues in fiscal 20252026 and 2024,2025, respectively, from contracts with agencies of the DoD.Department of War (DoW). We also generated 24.6% and 25.6% of our total revenues in fiscal 2026 and 2025, respectively, from contracts with the Intelligence Community (IC). We expect that federal government contracts will continue to be the primary source of our revenues for the foreseeable future. If we were suspended or debarred from contracting with the federal government or any significant agency in the Intelligence Community (IC) or the DoD,DoW, if our reputation or relationship with government agencies was impaired, or if the government otherwise ceased doing business with us or significantly decreased the amount of business it does with us, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results would be materially and adversely affected.
Our business could be adversely affected by delays caused by our competitors protesting major contract awards received by us, resulting in the delay of the initiation of work.
The number of bid protests of contract awards by unsuccessful bidders is increasing and the U.S. government is taking longer to resolve such protests. Bid protests may result in an increase in expenses related to obtaining contract awards or an unfavorable modification or loss of an award. In the event a bid protest is unsuccessful, the resulting delay in the startup and funding of the work under these contracts may cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.
Because we derive substantially all of our revenues from contracts with the federal government, the success and development of our business will continue to depend on our successful participation in federal government contract programs. Actions taken by the federal government to address government budget deficits, the national debt, or prevailing economic conditions, including the use of continuing resolutions, delays or reductions in appropriations, or a federal government shutdown, may prevent us from performing on existing contracts, delay our ability to begin work on new awards, or require us to use our own funds to meet our customers’ desired delivery schedules. A lapse in appropriations, delays in the passage of annual budgets, or the use of continuing resolutions can postpone contract awards, slow program execution, interrupt customer decision making, or defer funding availability, even in periods where long-term spending levels remain stable. The duration, frequency, and severity of any such disruptions are unpredictable and could materially impact our financial results.
Additionally, the federal government may also change its budgeting in response to evolving national security, technology, economic, or policy considerations. A significant decline in expenditures for programs in our addressable markets, or a reallocation of funds toward missions or capabilities we do not directly support, or a change in federal government contracting policies could cause federal agencies to decrease purchases under existing contracts, terminate contracts for convenience, or choose not to exercise options and impact our ability to win new awards.
For further discussion, refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Because we derive substantially all of our revenues from contracts with the federal government, we believe that the success and development of our business will continue to depend on our successful participation in federal government contract programs. Changes in federal government budgetary priorities, such as for homeland security or to address global pandemics, or actions taken to address government budget deficits, the national debt, or prevailing economic conditions, could directly affect our financial performance. A significant decline in government expenditures, a shift of expenditures away from programs that we support or a change in federal government contracting policies could cause federal government agencies to reduce their purchases under contracts, to exercise their right to terminate contracts at any time without penalty or not to exercise options to renew contracts. For further discussion, refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition & Results of Operations” in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
At times, we may continue to work without funding, and use our own internal funds in order to meet our customers' desired delivery dates for Expertise or Technology. It is uncertain at this time which of our programs’ funding could be reduced in future years or whether new legislation will be passed by Congress in the next fiscal year that could result in additional or alternative funding cuts.
Additionally, our business could be affected if we experience an increase in set-asides for small businesses that could result in our inability to compete directly for prime contracts.
Our federal government contracts may be terminated by the government at any time and may contain other provisions permitting the government not to continue with contract performance, and if lost contracts are not replaced, our operating results may differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.
We generate substantially all of our revenues from federal government contracts that typically include a base period and discrete option periods. The option periods typically cover more than half of the contract’s potential duration. Federal government agencies generally have the right not to exercise these option periods. In addition, our contracts typically also contain provisions permitting a government customer to terminate the contract for its convenience. A decision not to exercise option periods or to terminate contracts for convenience could result in significant revenue shortfalls from those anticipated.
Federal government contracts contain termination rights and numerous other provisions that are unfavorable to us.
•terminate contracts for convenience;
If the government terminates a contract for convenience, we may recover only our incurred or committed costs, settlement expenses, and profit on work completed prior to the termination. If the government terminates a contract for default, we may be unable to recover even those amounts and instead may be liable for excess costs incurred by the government in procuring undelivered items and services from another source. Depending on the value of a contract, such termination could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated. Certain contracts also contain organizational conflict of interest (OCI) clauses that limit our ability to compete for or perform certain other contracts. OCIs arise any time we engage in activities that (i) make us unable or potentially unable to render impartial assistance or advice to the government; (ii) impair or might impair our objectivity in performing contract work; or (iii) provide us with an unfair competitive advantage. For example, when we work on the design of a particular system, we may be precluded from competing for the contract to develop and install that system. Depending upon the value of the matters affected, an OCI issue that precludes our participation in or performance of a program or contract could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.
Certain contracts also contain organizational conflict of interest (OCI) clauses that limit our ability to compete for or perform certain other contracts. OCIs arise any time we engage in activities that (i) make us unable or potentially unable to render impartial assistance or advice to the government; (ii) impair or might impair our objectivity in performing contract work; or (iii) provide us with an unfair competitive advantage. For example, when we work on the design of a particular system, we may be precluded from competing for the contract to develop and install that system. Depending upon the value of the matters affected, an OCI issue that precludes our participation in or performance of a program or contract could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.
As is common with government contractors, we have experienced and continue to experience occasional performance issues under certain of our contracts. Depending upon the value of the matters affected, a performance problem that impacts our performance of a program or contract could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.anticipated and impair our prospects for future contract awards.
We derive significant revenues from contracts and task orders awarded through a competitive bidding process. If we are unable to consistently win new awards over any extended period, or if we face significant delays due to competitor protests, our business and prospects will be adversely affected.
Our contracts and task orders with the federal government are typically awarded through a competitive bidding process. We expect that much of the business that we will seek in the foreseeable future will continue to be awarded through competitive bidding.
Our contracts and task orders with the federal government are typically awarded through a competitive bidding process. We expect that much of the business that we will seek in the foreseeable future will continue to be awarded through competitive bidding. Budgetary pressures and changes in the procurement process have caused many government customers to increasingly purchase goods and services through IDIQ contracts, GSA schedule contracts and other government-wide acquisition contracts. These contracts, some of which are awarded to multiple contractors, have increased competition and pricing pressure, requiring that we make sustained post-award efforts to realize revenues under each such contract. In addition, in consideration of the practice of agencies awarding work under such contracts that is arguably outside the intended scope of the contracts, both the GSA and the DoDDoW have initiated programs aimed to ensure that all work fits properly within the scope of the contract under which it is awarded. The net effect of such programs may reduce the number of bidding opportunities available to us. Moreover, even if we are highly qualified to work on a particular new contract, we might not be awarded business because of the federal government’s policy and practice of maintaining a diverse contracting base.
•we expend substantial cost and managerial time and effort to prepare bids and proposals for contracts that we may not win; and
•we may be unable to estimate accurately the resources and cost structure that will be required to service any contract we win; andwin.
In addition to the challenges of the bidding process, our business could be adversely affected by our competitors protesting major contract awards. Defending against these challenges can result in significant expenses and any such protest or challenge could lead to the resubmission of bids on modified specifications, an unfavorable modification, or the termination, reduction, or complete loss of an awarded contract. Even an unsuccessful bid protest could delay the initiation, startup, and funding of the work under these contracts and may cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.
•we may encounter expense and delay if our competitors protest or challenge awards of contracts to us in competitive bidding, and any such protest or challenge could result in the resubmission of bids on modified specifications, or in the termination, reduction or modification of the awarded contract.
We depend on the timely collection of our receivables to generate cash flow, provide working capital, pay debt, and support ongoing business operations. If the federal government, any of our other customers, or any prime contractor for whom we are a subcontractor fails to pay or delays payment of their outstanding invoices for any reason, our financial condition and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.
The federal government may delay payment of invoices for several reasons, including lack of appropriated funds, delays in the budget or appropriations process, or other funding constraints. We are also subject to audits or oversight activities by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) which has the authority to revoke our direct-billing privileges and contracting officers who may impose contractual withholdings, including those required under the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulations when a contractor’s business systems are found to have a material weakness. Prime contractors for whom we are a subcontractor may also experience cash-flow constraints or have limited financial resources, which increases the risk that payments due to us may be delayed or not paid in full.
Difficulties collecting receivables for any reason can impair our ability to meet our financial obligations, increase our cost of capital, reduce our ability to invest in growth or new opportunities, and require us to obtain additional sources of liquidity on less favorable terms. If we are unable to collect receivables in the amounts or within the timeframes we expect, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated, and our overall business performance could be negatively affected.
We depend on the collection of our receivables to generate cash flow, provide working capital, pay debt, and continue our business operations. If the federal government, any of our other customers, or any prime contractor for whom we are a subcontractor fails to pay or delays the payment of their outstanding invoices for any reason, our business and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected. The government may fail to pay outstanding invoices for a number of reasons, including lack of appropriated funds or lack of an approved budget. In addition, the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) may revoke our direct billing privileges, which would adversely affect our ability to collect our receivables in a timely manner. Contracting officers have the authority to impose contractual withholdings, which can also adversely affect our ability to collect timely. The Defense Federal Acquisition Regulations require DoD contracting officers to impose contractual withholdings at no less than certain minimum levels if a contracting officer determines that one or more of a contractor’s business systems have one or more significant deficiencies. Some prime contractors for whom we are a subcontractor have significantly fewer financial resources than we do, which may increase the risk that we may not be paid in full or payment may be delayed. If we experience difficulties collecting receivables, it could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.
The federal government may change its procurement practices, or adopt new contracting rules and regulations, such as thosea relatedresult of an increased focus on affordability, efficiencies, business systems and recovery of costs. Any initiatives or changes to costcurrent accountingprocurement standards.practices, Itincluding, couldbut alsonot adopt new contracting methods relatinglimited to GSAincreased contractsusage orof other government-widefixed-price contracts, adoptmultiple-award contracts, small business set-aside contracts, new socio-economic requirements, or changechanges to the basis upon which it reimburses our compensation and other expenses or otherwise limit such reimbursements.reimbursements could have adverse effects on our business. In alladdition, suchalthough cases,we therecontinue isto uncertaintyexpand surroundingour theportfolio of technology solutions, changes andto whatservice-based actualprocurement impacts theypractices may havealso onadversely contractors.affect Theseour changesperformance. As new contracting methods could be costly or administratively difficult for us to satisfy, they could impair our ability to obtain new contracts or win re-competed contracts or adversely affect our future profit margin.margin Any new contracting methods could be costly or administratively difficult for us to satisfy and, as a result,which could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.
Specifically, certain federal agencies are increasingly using alternative or rapid acquisition pathways for emerging technologies, including flexible contracting approaches such as “other transaction authority” agreements. These acquisition methods differ from traditional FAR based processes and may involve requirements, such as participation by non‑traditional contractors or cost‑sharing obligations, that could limit our ability to qualify or compete effectively. If we are unable to adapt to these evolving procurement approaches or meet the associated eligibility, technical, or administrative requirements, we may be unable to pursue certain strategic opportunities in high‑growth areas. As a result, our ability to capture new awards, expand into developing mission areas, or achieve expected levels of performance and growth could be adversely affected.
Restrictions on or other changes to the federal government’s use of service contracts may harm our operating results.
We derive a significant amount of revenues from service contracts with the federal government. The government may face restrictions from new legislation, regulations, or government union pressures, on the nature and amount of services the government may obtain from private contractors (i.e., insourcing versus outsourcing). Any reduction in the government’s use of private contractors to provide federal services could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.
Federal government agencies, including the DCAA and the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA),Agency, routinely audit and investigate government contracts and government contractors’ administrative processes and systems. These agencies review our performance on contracts, pricing practices, cost structure, and compliance with applicable laws, regulations and standards. They also evaluate the adequacy of internal controls over our business systems, including our purchasing, accounting, estimating, earned value management, and government property systems. Any costs found to be improperly allocated or assigned to contracts will not be reimbursed, and any such costs already reimbursed must be refunded and certain penalties may be imposed. Moreover, if any of the administrative processes and systems are found not to comply with requirements, we may be subjected to increased government scrutiny and approval that could delay or otherwise adversely affect our ability to compete for or perform contracts or collect our revenues in a timely manner. Therefore, an unfavorable outcome of an audit by the DCAA or another government agency could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated. If a government investigation uncovers improper or illegal activities, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, forfeitures of profits, suspension of payments, fines, and suspension or debarment from doing business with the federal government. In addition, we could suffer serious reputational harm if allegations of impropriety were made against us. Each of these results could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.
We may not receiverealize the full amountsvalue authorized underof the contracts included in our backlog, which could reducecause our future revenues inand futureoperating periodsresults belowto thediffer levelsmaterially from those anticipated.
Our total backlog consists of funded and unfunded amounts. Funded backlog represents contractthe value of contracts for which funding has been appropriated less revenues previously recognized on these contracts. Unfunded backlog represents the estimated values that have the potential to be recognized into revenue from executed contracts for which funding has not yet been appropriated and unexercised contract options. OurBacklog backlogis not a guarantee of future revenues, and the timing or amount of work ultimately performed may notvary resultsignificantly in actual revenues in any particular period, or at all, which could causefrom our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.estimates.
There are several reasons why our backlog may not convert into revenue as expected. Many of our federal government contracts include multi‑year performance periods that depend on annual Congressional appropriations, and unfunded work is subject to future funding decisions. A lack of appropriated funds, delays in the federal budget or appropriations process, or efforts to reduce federal spending could delay or preclude the government from funding work included in our backlog. In addition, the maximum contract value specified under a contract or task order is not necessarily indicative of the revenue we will ultimately realize under that contract. For example, we perform significant work under multiple-award and IDIQ contract vehicles that do not require the government to order a minimum amount of goods or services and under which agencies may choose to obtain support from other contractors.
Changes in mission priorities, procurement strategies, or program execution may also result in reductions in scope, fewer task order awards, or lower-than-anticipated ordering levels.
Backlog may also not be collected if a customer reduces, delays, or cancels planned work; elects not to exercise contract options; or shifts work to other contractors. Our estimates of unfunded backlog may prove inaccurate, and the timing and amount of revenue ultimately realized may differ materially from our expectations. If we do not receive the anticipated funding, if the government does not order work at expected levels, or if we are unable to perform or retain the work included in our backlog, our future revenues, cash flows, and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.
The maximum contract value specified under a government contract or task order awarded to us is not necessarily indicative of the revenues that we will realize under that contract. For example, we generate a substantial portion of our revenues from government contracts in which we are not the sole provider, meaning that the government could turn to other companies to fulfill the contract. We also generate revenues from IDIQ contracts, which do not require the government to purchase a pre-determined amount of goods or services under the contract. Action by the government to obtain support from other contractors or failure of the government to order the quantity of work anticipated could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.
Without additional Congressional appropriations, some of the contracts included in our backlog will remain unfunded, which could materially and adversely affect our future operating results.
Many of our federal government contracts include multi-year performance periods in which Congress appropriates funds on an annual basis. As a result, a majority of our contracts are only partially funded at any point during their full performance period and unfunded contract work is subject to future appropriations by Congress. As a result of a lack of appropriated funds or efforts to reduce federal government spending, our backlog may not result in revenues or may be delayed. We calculate our unfunded backlog based on the aggregate contract revenues that we have the potential to realize. If our backlog estimate is inaccurate and we fail to realize those amounts as revenues, our future operating results could be materially and adversely affected.
Our continued success depends to a substantial degree on our ability to recruit and retain the technically skilled personnel we need to serve our customers effectively. Our business involves the development of tailored solutions for our customers, a process that relies heavily upon the expertise and services of our employees. Accordingly, our employees are our most valuable resource. Competition for skilled personnel is intense, and technology companies often experience high attrition among their skilled employees. There is a shortage of people capable of filling these positions and they are likely to remain a limited resource for the foreseeable future. Recruiting and training these personnel require substantial resources. Our failure to attract and retain technical personnel could increase our costs of performing our contractual obligations, reduce our ability to efficiently satisfy our customers’ needs, limit our ability to win new business, and cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated. In addition to attracting and retaining qualified technical personnel, we believe that our success will depend on the continued employment of our senior management team and its ability to generate new business and execute projects successfully. Our senior management team is very important to our business because personal reputations and individual business relationships are a critical element of obtaining and maintaining customer engagements in our industry, particularly with agencies performing classified operations. The loss of any of our senior executives could cause us to lose customer relationships or new business opportunities, which could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.
In addition to attracting and retaining qualified technical personnel, we believe that our success will depend on the continued employment of our senior management team and its ability to generate new business and execute projects successfully. Our senior management team is very important to our business because personal reputations and individual business relationships are a critical element of obtaining and maintaining customer engagements in our industry, particularly with agencies performing classified operations. The loss of any of our senior executives could cause us to lose customer relationships or new business opportunities, which could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.
We may experience an increase in the costs in our supply and labor markets due to global inflationary pressures and other various geopolitical factors. We generate a portion of our revenues through various fixed-price and multi-year government contracts which anticipate moderate increases in costs over the term of the contract. With the current pace of inflation our standard approach to moderate annual price escalations in our bids for multi-year work may be insufficient to counter inflationary cost pressures. This could result in reduced profits, or even losses, as inflation increases, particularly for fixed-priced contracts and our longer-term multi-year contracts. In the competitive environment in which we operate as a government contractor, the lack of pricing leverage and ability to renegotiate long-term, multi-year contracts could reduce our profits, disrupt our business, or otherwise materially adversely affect our results of operations.
This could result in reduced profits, or even losses, as inflation increases, particularly for fixed-priced contracts and our longer-term multi-year contracts. In the competitive environment in which we operate as a government contractor, the lack of pricing leverage and ability to renegotiate long-term, multi-year contracts could reduce our profits, disrupt our business, or otherwise materially adversely affect our results of operations.
We may lose money or generate less than anticipated profits if we do not accurately estimate the cost of an engagement which is conducted on either a fixed-price or a time-and-materials basis.
We generated 26.3% and 27.3% of our total revenues in fiscal 2025 and 2024, respectively, from fixed-price contracts. Fixed-price contracts require us to price our contracts by predicting our expenditures in advance. In addition, some of our engagements obligate us to provide ongoing maintenance and other supporting or ancillary services on a fixed-price basis or with limitations on our ability to increase prices. Many of our engagements are also on a time-and-materials basis. While these types of contracts are generally subject to less uncertainty than fixed-price contracts, to the extent that our actual labor costs are higher than the contract rates,expected, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.
We use estimates in recognizing revenues, and changes in those estimates may adversely affect our financial results.
A significant portion of our revenue is recognized over time using a cost-input measure of progress, which requires us to make accurate estimates of total costs at completion and the fees to be earned on our contracts. Because of the technical complexity of the solutions and services we provide, as well as the extended duration of certain contracts, this estimation process is highly complex and requires significant management judgment. As contract performance progresses, we routinely adjust our initial estimates based on experience gained and newly available information, even when the scope of work under the performance obligation has not changed. If our underlying assumptions or estimates prove to be inaccurate, or if circumstances change, we may be required to make material adjustments to our revenue and profit margins. Such adjustments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
AtWe Junegenerate 30,revenue 2025,from oura backlogmix includedof cost reimbursable, time-and-materialstime-and-materials, and fixed-price contracts.contracts, Costof reimbursable and time-and-materials contracts generally have lowerwhich profit margins than fixed-price contracts.vary. Our earnings and margins may therefore varychange materially and adversely depending on the relative mix of contract types, the costs incurred in their performance, the achievement of other performance objectives, and the stage of performance at which the right to receive fees, particularly under incentive and award fee contracts, is finally determined.
One of our key growth strategies has been to selectively pursue acquisitions. Through acquisitions, we have expanded our base of federal government customers, increased the range of solutions we offer to our customerscustomers, and deepened our penetration of existing markets and customers. We may encounter difficulty identifying and executing suitable acquisitions. To the extent that management is involved in identifying acquisition opportunities or integrating new acquisitions into our business, our management may be diverted from operating our core business. Without acquisitions, we may not grow as rapidly as we historically have grown, which could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated. We may encounter other risks in executing our acquisition strategy, including:
We have substantial investments in goodwill and intangible assets as a result of prior acquisitions, and changes in future business conditions could cause these investments to become impaired, requiring substantial write-downs that would reduce our operating income.
As of June 30, 2025, goodwill accounts for $5.0 billion of our total assets. We evaluate the recoverability of goodwill amounts annually or when evidence of potential impairment exists. The annual impairment test is based on several factors requiring judgment. Principally, a decrease in expected reporting unit cash flows or changes in market conditions may indicate potential impairment of goodwill. We evaluate impairment for intangible assets with finite lives whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable at the asset group level. If there is an impairment, we would be required to write down the amount of goodwill,goodwill and intangible assets, which would be reflected as a charge against operating income.
Our seniordebt secured credit facility (the Credit Facility), senior secured term loan (Term Loan B Facility), and senior unsecured notes (2033 Notes)instruments impose certain restrictions on our ability to take certain actions which may have an impact on our business, operating resultsresults, and financial condition.
TheWe have several debt instruments, including a senior secured credit facility (the Credit Facility,Facility), senior secured term loans (Term Loan B Facility,and Term Loan B-2), and senior unsecured notes (2033 Notes and 2033 NotesNotes-2). These debt instruments impose certain operating and financial restrictions on us and requiresrequire us to meet certain financial covenants. These restrictions may significantly limit or prohibit us from engaging in certain transactions, and include the followingincluding:
•transforming or selling certain assets currently held by us, including certain sale and lease-back transactions;
We have been in compliance with all covenants since inception of the Credit Facility, Term Loan BB, Facility,Term Loan B-2, 2033 Notes, and 2033 Notes.Notes-2.
We may incur additional indebtedness, which could impact our ability to service our debts.
Despite our outstanding debt, we may incur additional indebtedness.
The Credit FacilityFacility, Term Loan B, and Term Loan B FacilityB-2 provide that certain change in control events will constitute a default. The 2033 Notes and 2033 Notes-2 provide that upon the occurrence of certain change in control events accompanied by a ratings decline, the Company may be required to repurchase outstanding notes, in whole or in part, at a redemption price of 101% plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption.
We must observe laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration and performance of federal government contracts which affect how we do business with our customers and may impose added costs on our business.operations. ForThese example,laws theand Federalregulations Acquisitioncontinue Regulationto evolve, and the federal government regularly updates or expands compliance obligations in areas such as cybersecurity, supply‑chain integrity, industrial securitysecurity, regulationscost accounting, and ethical conduct. Keeping pace with these changes requires ongoing investment in compliance processes, monitoring systems, training, and internal controls, and increases the complexity and cost of themaintaining DoDcompliance andacross relatedour laws include provisions that:business.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
Largest changes
“•IC revenues include Technology and Expertise provided to the 18 intelligence customers defined as the IC by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.”see in full comparison
•see in full comparisonDoDDoW revenues includeExpertiseTechnology andTechnologyExpertise provided to variousDoDDoWcustomers.customers, excluding those defined as part of the IC.
Direct Costs. Direct costs include direct labor, subcontractor costs, materials, and other direct costs. The increase in direct costs was primarily attributable tosee in full comparisondirectthelaborincreaseandinsubcontractor costs from organic growth on existing programs and higher materials costs.revenues. As a percentage of revenues, total direct costs were67.6%66.8% and67.2%67.6% for fiscal20252026 and2024,2025, respectively.
“While we view the budget environment as constructive and believe there is bipartisan support for continued investment in the areas of defense and national security, it is uncertain when (and if) in any particular government fiscal year (GFY) that appropriations bills will be passed. During those periods of time when appropriations bills have not been passed and signed into law, government agencies operate under a CR, a temporary measure that typically allows the government to continue operations at prior year funding levels. …”see in full comparison
On May 2, 2025, the Presidentsee in full comparisonTrumpsubmitted the GFY26 Presidential Budget Request (PBR)to Congress,, whichheldproposed holding defense spending at the GFY25 enactedlevel(afull-year CR) level of $893 billion. On July 4, 2025, the PresidentTrumpsigned the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA),whichaprovidesreconciliation bill providing additional mandatory fundingabove and beyondoutside thePBR.regular annual appropriations process. The OBBBAismadeaimmediatelyreconciliation bill, which is separate from the usual government funding legislation that Congress will still need to pass before October 1, 2025 or pass a CR. The OBBBA provides immediate funding for specified parts of the government, includingavailable approximately $156 billion in defense funding (including $25 billion for the Golden Dome initiative).When combined with the President’s GFY26 PBR, this represents growth of approximately 13% over GFY25 enacted levels for defense. In addition, the OBBBA providesand approximately $170 billion for border security and immigration.Since this is direct funding authorized by reconciliation outside the normal budget process,Because these fundswillwerebeauthorized through the reconciliation process, they remain available in GFY26 and beyond regardless of whethernormalCongressappropriationsenacts full-year appropriations, passes a CR, or enters aCRgovernmentis passed.shutdown.
see in full comparisonDependingTheon their scope, duration,scope andotherdurationfactors,of CRs can negativelyimpactaffect our businessduebyto delays indelaying newprogram starts, delays inprograms, contractawardawards,decisions, andor otherfactors.customerWhendecisions. If a CRexpires,expiresunlesswithout the enactment of full-year appropriationsbillsorhaveanbeenextensionpassed by Congress and signed by the President, orvia a newCR is passed and signed into law,CR, the federal government must ceaseoperations,non-essentialoroperationsshutdown,(a “government shutdown”), exceptinwherecertaincontinuingemergencyactivitiessituationsareorauthorizedwhenbythe law authorizes continued activity.law. Wecontinuously reviewevaluate ouroperationsportfolioinon anattemptongoing basis to identifyprogramsareas potentially at risk from CRssoorthatshutdownsweandcantoconsiderdevelop appropriate contingency plans.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (43)
We are a leading provider of ExpertiseTechnology and TechnologyExpertise to customers in support of national security in the intelligence, defense, and federal civilian sectors, both domestically and internationally. The demand for our ExpertiseTechnology and TechnologyExpertise is largely driven by the evolving national security and geopolitical environment, the increasingly complex network, systems, and information environments in which governments and businesses operate, and the ongoing need to stay current with emerging technologies.
We carefullyclosely followmonitor U.S. federal budget, legislativelegislative, and contracting trendsdevelopments, and activitieswe and evolveadjust our business strategies to takeaccount for these intotrends. consideration. WhileAlthough future levels of defense and non-defense spending may vary and are difficult to project,predict, we believe that there continues to be bipartisan support for defense and national security-relatedsecurity spending,programs, particularly given the heightened current global threat environment.
While we view the current budget environment as constructive, the timing and passage of annual appropriations remain uncertain in any given government fiscal year (GFY). During periods when Congress has not enacted full-year appropriations, federal agencies operate under a CR. A CR typically authorizes agencies to continue operating at prior year funding levels and may restrict new program starts or delay contract awards.
While we view the budget environment as constructive and believe there is bipartisan support for continued investment in the areas of defense and national security, it is uncertain when (and if) in any particular government fiscal year (GFY) that appropriations bills will be passed. During those periods of time when appropriations bills have not been passed and signed into law, government agencies operate under a CR, a temporary measure that typically allows the government to continue operations at prior year funding levels. On March 15, 2025, President Trump signed a CR that extended government funding through September 30, 2025, the remainder of GFY25 (a full-year CR). This is the first time that the Department of Defense (DoD) has been funded by a full-year CR, and this latest CR has some anomalies included that make it different than a typical CR, including (i) new appropriation levels were established rather than using the GFY24 levels (e.g., defense spending raised to $893 billion, which is just under the $895 billion President Biden requested for GFY25), (ii) DoD is allowed to start certain new programs, and (iii) DoD was given expanded transfer authority to reallocate funding between different accounts.
DependingThe on their scope, duration,scope and otherduration factors,of CRs can negatively impactaffect our business dueby to delays indelaying new program starts, delays inprograms, contract awardawards, decisions, andor other factors.customer Whendecisions. If a CR expires,expires unlesswithout the enactment of full-year appropriations billsor havean beenextension passed by Congress and signed by the President, orvia a new CR is passed and signed into law,CR, the federal government must cease operations,non-essential oroperations shutdown,(a “government shutdown”), except inwhere certaincontinuing emergencyactivities situationsare orauthorized whenby the law authorizes continued activity.law. We continuously reviewevaluate our operationsportfolio inon an attemptongoing basis to identify programsareas potentially at risk from CRs soor thatshutdowns weand canto considerdevelop appropriate contingency plans.
On May 2, 2025, the President Trump submitted the GFY26 Presidential Budget Request (PBR) to Congress,, which heldproposed holding defense spending at the GFY25 enacted level (a full-year CR) level of $893 billion. On July 4, 2025, the President Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), whicha providesreconciliation bill providing additional mandatory funding above and beyondoutside the PBR.regular annual appropriations process. The OBBBA ismade aimmediately reconciliation bill, which is separate from the usual government funding legislation that Congress will still need to pass before October 1, 2025 or pass a CR. The OBBBA provides immediate funding for specified parts of the government, includingavailable approximately $156 billion in defense funding (including $25 billion for the Golden Dome initiative). When combined with the President’s GFY26 PBR, this represents growth of approximately 13% over GFY25 enacted levels for defense. In addition, the OBBBA providesand approximately $170 billion for border security and immigration. Since this is direct funding authorized by reconciliation outside the normal budget process,Because these funds willwere beauthorized through the reconciliation process, they remain available in GFY26 and beyond regardless of whether normalCongress appropriationsenacts full-year appropriations, passes a CR, or enters a CRgovernment is passed.shutdown.
On October 1, 2025, the federal government entered a shutdown. On November 12, 2025, the President signed a CR that ended the shutdown and restored government operations, extending funding for most agencies at GFY25 levels through January 30, 2026. Following the expiration of that CR, a partial shutdown occurred. On February 3, 2026, the President signed five of the six remaining GFY26 full-year appropriations bills, alongside a two-week CR for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The enacted defense appropriations bill provided full-year funding for the DoW with a topline of $838.7 billion, approximately $8.4 billion above the GFY26 PBR.
On February 14, 2026, the temporary funding for DHS expired, and the department entered a shutdown. Portions of DHS operations continued due to the availability of mandatory OBBBA funding. On April 30, 2026, Congress passed full-year GFY26 funding for DHS, excluding funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP), both of which continued to rely on OBBBA funding. On June 9, 2026, Congress passed the Secure America Act (Reconciliation 2.0), providing $70 billion primarily allocated to ICE and CBP. Because this funding was enacted through reconciliation, it remains available through September 30, 2029.
On April 3, 2026, while the GFY26 appropriations process was still being finalized, the President submitted the GFY27 Presidential Budget Request (PBR). The GFY27 PBR proposes $1.15 trillion in discretionary defense spending, $350 billion in mandatory defense spending through a separate reconciliation bill, and $63 billion in discretionary spending for homeland security. Congress is currently evaluating the proposal through the annual congressional appropriations process.
See “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional discussion of how changes in the federal budget and appropriations process may affect our operations.
We provide ExpertiseTechnology and TechnologyExpertise to government customers. We believe that the total addressable market for our offerings is sufficient to support the Company'sCompany’s plans and is expected to continue to grow over the next several years. Approximately 75%78% of our revenue comes from defense-relatedDoW and IC customers, including those in the IC, with additional revenue coming from non-defensefederal IC,civilian homelandagencies security,and commercial and other federal civilian customers.
•Increasing focus on application of technologies to defend the homeland, such as counter missile and drone defense;
•Increased investments in advanced technologies, particularly software-based technologies, including AI;
•Increased investments in advanced technologies (e.g., AI), particularly software-based technologies;
•Increasing focus on application of technologies to defend the homeland;
We believe that our customers’ use of lowest price/technically acceptable (LPTA) procurements, which contributed to pricing pressures in past years, has moderated, though price still remains an important factor in procurements. We also continue to see protests of major contract awards and delays in U.S. government procurement activities. In addition, many of our federal government contracts require us to employ personnel with security clearances, specific levels of education, and specific past work experience. Depending on the level of clearance, security clearances can be difficult and time-consuming to obtainobtain, and competition for skilled personnel in the industry is intense. Additional factors that could affect U.S. government spending in our addressable market include changes in set-asides for small businesses and budgetary priorities, including efficiency initiatives like the Department of Government Efficiency, limiting, delaying, or reducing federal government spending in general.priorities.
•DoDDoW revenues include ExpertiseTechnology and TechnologyExpertise provided to various DoDDoW customers.customers, excluding those defined as part of the IC.
•IC revenues include Technology and Expertise provided to the 18 intelligence customers defined as the IC by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
•Federal civilian agencies’agencies revenues primarily include ExpertiseTechnology and TechnologyExpertise provided to non-DoDnon-DoW and non-IC agencies and departments of the U.S. federal government, including intelligence agencies andthe Departments of Homeland Security, Justice, Agriculture, Health and Human Services, and State.
•Commercial and other revenues primarily include ExpertiseTechnology and TechnologyExpertise provided to U.S. state and local governments, commercial customers, and certain foreign governments and agencies through our international reportable segment.
Direct Costs. Direct costs include direct labor, subcontractor costs, materials, and other direct costs. The increase in direct costs was primarily attributable to directthe laborincrease andin subcontractor costs from organic growth on existing programs and higher materials costs.revenues. As a percentage of revenues, total direct costs were 67.6%66.8% and 67.2%67.6% for fiscal 20252026 and 2024,2025, respectively.
Indirect Costs and Selling Expenses. The increase in indirect costs and selling expenses was primarily attributable to an increase in fringe benefit expenses onand overhead costs associated with a higherlarger labor base.base and an increase in acquisition related expenses. As a percentage of revenues, indirect costs and selling expenses decreasedwere to21.0% and 21.2% for fiscal 20252026 fromand 22.5%2025, for fiscal 2024, which was primarily attributable to the synergies from the acquisitions.respectively.
Depreciation and Amortization. DepreciationThe increase in depreciation and amortization for fiscal 2025 increased compared to prior yearwas due to the amortization of intangible assets obtainedacquired throughin acquisitionsfiscal made2026 and the timing of intangible assets acquired in fiscal 2025.
Interest Expense and Other, Net. The increase in interest expense and other, net was primarily attributabledue to higher outstanding debt balances andin coststhe incurredcurrent withyear debtresulting issuances.from borrowings used to finance acquisitions.
Income Taxes. The Company’s effective income tax rate was 17.4%23.9% and 22.9%17.4% for fiscal 2026 and 2025, respectively. The effective tax rates for fiscal 2026 and 2025 were primarily driven by state income taxes offset by R&D tax credits. Additionally, the effective tax rate for fiscal 2025 and 2024, respectively. Fiscal 2025 effective tax rate benefited from a reduction in unrecognized tax benefits following our resolution of a federal income tax audit. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2024 benefited from research and development tax credits partially offset by state income taxes. See “Note 1615 – Income Taxes” in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
As of June 30, 2025,2026, the Company had total backlog of $31.4$32.0 billion, compared with $31.6$31.4 billion a year ago, aan decreaseincrease of 0.6%.1.9%. Funded backlog as of June 30, 20252026 was $4.2$5.4 billion. The total backlog consists of remaining performance obligations plus unexercised options. See “Note 56 – Revenues” in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information related to remaining performance obligations.
•Fixed-price contracts: This contract type provides for a fixed-price for specified ExpertiseTechnology and TechnologyExpertise and is often used when there is more certainty regarding the estimated costs to complete the contractual statement of work. Since the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, there is higher risk and generally potential profit associated with this contract type.
As discussed further withinin “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A,1A Risk Factors inof this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our earnings and margins may vary based on the mix of our contract types. We generated the following revenues by contract type for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):
Existing cash and cash equivalents and cash generated by operations are our primary sources of liquidity, as well as sales of receivables under our Master Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement (MARPA) and available borrowings under our Creditrevolving Facility.credit Asfacility (the Revolving Facility), which permits renewable borrowings of Juneup 30,to 2025,$2,000.0 wemillion. hadThe $106.2Revolving Facility also has sub-facilities of $150.0 million infor cashsame-day swing line loan borrowings and cash$25.0 equivalents.million for stand-by letters of credit.
The Company has a $3,200.0$3,250.0 million senior secured credit facility (the Credit Facility,Facility), which consists of a $1,975.0 millionthe Revolving Facility and a $1,225.0$1,250.0 million term loan (the Term Loan. The Revolving Facility is a secured facility that permits continuously renewable borrowings and has subfacilities of $100.0 million for same-day swing line borrowings and $25.0 million for stand-by letters of credit.Loan). As of June 30, 2025,2026, $124.5the Company had $1,340.0 million wasof outstandingundrawn capacity under the Revolving Facility and no borrowings on the swing line. The Company also has Term Loan B Facilityline and 2033stand-by Notes, with a principal amountletters of $750.0 million and $1,000.0 million, respectively.credit.
During fiscal year 2023, a provision of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) took effect, which eliminated the option to deduct domestic research and development costs in the year incurred and instead requires taxpayers to capitalize and amortize such costs over five years. This provision decreased fiscal year 2025 cash flows from operations by $47.4 million and increased net deferred tax assets by a similar amount. The OBBBA enacted a provision that allows immediate deduction of domestic research and development costs in the year incurred. The Company’s cash tax payments will benefit materially as a result of this provision in fiscal 2026.
See “Note 67 – Sales of Receivables” and “Note 1211 – Long-term Debt” in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
AThe summaryfollowing oftable summarizes cash flow information isfor the periods presented below (dollars in thousands):
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $49.7$339.7 million primarily due to $162.7 million in higher net income, adjustedthe fordeduction non-cashof items,domestic andR&D $48.0costs millionpursuant into lowertax incomeprovisions taxes payments, partially offsetenacted by the OBBBA, timing of milestone billings and customer payments of $141.3 million, a decrease of $11.1 million in cash provided by the Company's MARPA,collections, and other net unfavorablefavorable changes in other operating assets and liabilities.
Net cash used in investing activities increased $1,607.0$975.3 million primarily due to higher cash used infor acquisitions.
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities increased $1,504.8$756.9 million primarily asdue ato resultan ofincrease a $1,528.3 million ofin net proceedsborrowings under our debt instruments, including the impactCredit of debt issuance costs forFacility, the Term Loan B FacilityB-2, and the 2033 Notes.Notes-2 and a decrease in stock repurchase activity.
We believe that the combination of cash and cash equivalents, internally generated funds, and available bank borrowings, and cash and cash equivalents on handborrowings will provide the required liquidity and capital resources necessary to fund on-going operations, customary capital expenditures, debt service obligations, and other working capital requirements over the next twelve months. We may in the future seek to borrow additional amounts under existing debt instruments or new debt instruments. Over the longer term, our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations necessary to fulfill theour obligationslong-term undercash the Credit Facility, Term Loan B Facility, 2033 Notes, and any other indebtedness we may incurrequirements will depend on our future financial performance. Our future financial performance which will be affected by many factors outside of our control, including current worldwide economic conditions andconditions, financial market conditions.conditions, and regulatory factors.
For a description of the Company’s contractual obligations related to debt, leases, and retirement plans refer to “Note 10 – Leases”, “Note 1211 – Long-term Debt”, and “Note 17 – Retirement Plans” in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We are subject to a number of reviews, investigations, claims, lawsuits, other uncertainties, and future obligations related to our business. For a discussion of these items, see “Note 19 – Legal Proceedings and Other Commitments and Contingencies” in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We believe the following accounting policies require significant judgment due to the complex nature of the underlying transactions:transactions.
We record all tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination at fair value as of the acquisition date, with any excess purchase consideration recorded as goodwill. For contingent purchase consideration, a liability is recognized at fair value as of the acquisition date with subsequent fair value adjustments recorded in operations. The Company uses various valuation methods,methods of income approach, including the relief-from-royalty method ofand the incomemulti-period approach,excess earnings method, to determine the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities assumed. The use of these methods requires management to make significant judgments which may include, among others, projections about expectedfuture futurerevenues, expenses, and cash flows, weighted averageweighted-average cost of capital, discount rates, royalty rates, and expected long-term growth rates. During the measurement period, not to exceed one year from the acquisition date, we may adjust provisional amounts recorded to reflect new information subsequently obtained regarding facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date.
We evaluate goodwill for both of our reporting units for impairment at least annually on the first day of the fiscal fourth quarter, or whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The evaluation includes comparing the fair value of the relevant reporting unit to its respective carrying value, including goodwill, and utilizes both income and market approaches. The analysis relies on significant judgementsjudgments and assumptions about expected future cash flows, weighted averageweighted-average cost of capital, discount rates, expected long-term growth rates, and financial measures derived from observable market data of comparable public companies. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025,2026, we completed our annual goodwill assessment and determined that each reporting unit’s fair value significantly exceeded its carrying value.
Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized using the method that best reflects how their economic benefits are utilized or, if a pattern of economic benefits cannot be reliably determined, on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which is generally over periods ranging from one to twentytwenty-six years. Intangible assets with finite lives are assessed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable at the asset group level.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
Reference is made to Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2025. There have been no material changes from the risk factors described in that report.
No wording changes found in this section.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
Largest changes
“On October 1, 2025, the U.S. government entered a shutdown. On November 12, 2025, President Trump signed a CR ending the government shutdown and restoring operations across all federal agencies. The CR extended funding for most of the federal government at GFY25 levels until midnight on January 30, 2026. A partial shutdown occurred following January 30, 2026, and on February 3, 2026, President Trump signed five of the six remaining GFY26 full year appropriations bills, as well as a two-week CR for the Department of Homeland Security. …”see in full comparison
Indirect Costs and Selling Expenses. Thesee in full comparisondecreaseincrease in indirect costs and selling expenses for the three months endedDecemberMarch 31,2025, compared to the prior year period, was primarily attributable to acquisition costs incurred in fiscal 2025 offset by increases in other indirect costs. The increase in indirect costs and selling expenses for the six months ended December 31, 2025,2026, compared to the prior year period, was primarily attributable to an increase in acquisition related expenses. The increase in indirect costs and selling expenses for the nine months ended March 31, 2026, compared to the prior year period, was primarily attributable to increases in fringe benefit expensesonand overhead costs associated with ahigherlarger laborbasebase,offsetacquisition-relatedbyexpenses,aanddecreaseotherinindirectacquisition related expenses.costs. As a percentage of revenue, indirect costs and selling expenses were20.9%21.7% and20.8%21.1% for the three andsixnine months endedDecemberMarch 31,2025,2026, respectively, and 22.2% and21.5%21.8% for the three andsixnine months endedDecemberMarch 31,2024,2025,respectively, driven by cost efficiencies across the Company.respectively.
“On March 15, 2025, President Trump signed a CR that extended government funding through September 30, 2025, the remainder of GFY25 (a full-year CR). …”see in full comparison
“To provide additional financial flexibility for the Company, in connection with the ARKA Group L.P. acquisition, the Company entered into a commitment letter (the Commitment Letter), dated December 19, 2025, with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (Wells Fargo), pursuant to which Wells Fargo committed to provide a senior secured bridge loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to $1,300.0 million. As of December 31, 2025, no amounts were funded pursuant to the Commitment Letter.”see in full comparison
“Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $164.6 million for the six months ended December 31, 2025, compared to the six months ended December 31, 2024, primarily due to the earnings increase of $107.2 million after adding back non-cash adjustments and $57.4 million of net favorable changes in working capital driven by increased cash collections.”see in full comparison
“Net cash provided by financing activities increased by $855.8 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2026, compared to the nine months ended March 31, 2025, primarily due to an increase in net borrowings under the Credit Facility, the Term Loan B-2, and the 2033 Notes-2 offset by a decrease in stock repurchase activity.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (24)
•Technology – CACI provides technology that addresses our customers’ most challenging needs. This includes agile software development using open modern architectures and DevSecOps; advanced data platformsplatforms, applications, and applicationsanalytics augmented by Artificial Intelligence (AI), Enterprise Resource Planning systems, electromagnetic spectrum capabilities, space-based sensors and ground site processors, photonics, and network modernization. CACI invests ahead of customer need with research and development to create unique and differentiated technology addressing critical national security needs.
On March 15, 2025, President Trump signed a CR that extended government funding through September 30, 2025, the remainder of GFY25 (a full-year CR). This is the first time that the Department of Defense (DoD) has been funded by a full-year CR, and this latest CR has some anomalies included that make it different than a typical CR, including (i) new appropriation levels were established rather than using the GFY24 levels (e.g., defense spending raised to $893 billion, which is just under the $895 billion President Biden requested for GFY25), (ii) DoD is allowed to start certain new programs, and (iii) DoD was given expanded transfer authority to reallocate funding between different accounts.
On October 1, 2025, the U.S. government entered a shutdown. On November 12, 2025, President Trump signed a CR ending the government shutdown and restoring operations across all federal agencies. The CR extended funding for most of the federal government at GFY25 levels until midnight on January 30, 2026. A partial shutdown occurred following January 30, 2026, and on February 3, 2026, President Trump signed five of the six remaining GFY26 full year appropriations bills, as well as a two-week CR for the Department of Homeland Security. The defense appropriations bill was passed, providing full year funding for the Department of Defense (DoD) with a topline of $838.7 billion, approximately $8.4 billion above the President’s defense budget request for GFY26. On February 14, 2026, the CR funding the Department of Homeland Security ended, and the department entered a shutdown. While DHS currently remains in a shutdown, portions of the department’s operations have continued due to funding from the OBBBA.
On October 1, 2025, the U.S. government entered a shutdown. On November 12, 2025, President Trump signed a CR ending the government shutdown and restoring operations across all federal agencies. The CR extended funding for most of the federal government at GFY25 levels until midnight on January 30, 2026.
We provide Expertise and Technology to government customers. We believe that the total addressable market for our offerings is sufficient to support the Company’s plans and is expected to continue to grow over the next several years. Approximately 77%78% of our revenue comes from defense-relatedDoD customers, including those in theand Intelligence Community (IC), customers, with additional revenue coming from non-defensefederal IC,civilian homelandagencies security,and commercial and other federal civilian agencies.customers.
•Increased spend on network and application modernization and enhancements to cyber security posture;
•Increased spending on network and application modernization and enhancements to cyber security posture;
Results of Operations for the Three and SixNine Months Ended DecemberMarch 31, 20252026 and 20242025
Revenues. The increase in revenues for the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2025,2026, was partially attributable to organic growth of 4.5%6.8% and 5.0%,5.6%, respectively, which included new contract awards and growth on existing programs.
The following table summarizes revenues by customer type with related percentages of revenues for the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20252026 and 2024,2025, respectively (dollars in thousands):
Direct Costs. Direct costs include direct labor, subcontractor costs, materials, and other direct costs. The increase in direct costs for the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2025,2026, compared to the prior year period,periods, was primarily attributable to the increase in revenues. As a percentage of revenue, direct costs were 67.3%66.1% and 67.5%67.0% for the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2025,2026, respectively, and 66.8%66.2% and 67.8%67.2% for the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2024,2025, respectively.
Indirect Costs and Selling Expenses. The decreaseincrease in indirect costs and selling expenses for the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2025, compared to the prior year period, was primarily attributable to acquisition costs incurred in fiscal 2025 offset by increases in other indirect costs. The increase in indirect costs and selling expenses for the six months ended December 31, 2025,2026, compared to the prior year period, was primarily attributable to an increase in acquisition related expenses. The increase in indirect costs and selling expenses for the nine months ended March 31, 2026, compared to the prior year period, was primarily attributable to increases in fringe benefit expenses onand overhead costs associated with a higherlarger labor basebase, offsetacquisition-related byexpenses, aand decreaseother inindirect acquisition related expenses.costs. As a percentage of revenue, indirect costs and selling expenses were 20.9%21.7% and 20.8%21.1% for the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2025,2026, respectively, and 22.2% and 21.5%21.8% for the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2024,2025, respectively, driven by cost efficiencies across the Company.respectively.
Depreciation and Amortization. The increase in depreciation and amortization for the three and six months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2025,2026, compared to the prior year period, was due to the amortization of intangible assets acquired in the third quarter of fiscal 2026. The increase in depreciation and amortization for the nine months ended March 31, 2026, compared to the prior year period, was due to the timing of intangible assets acquired in fiscal 2025.
Interest Expense and Other, Net. The increase in interest expense and other, net for the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2025,2026, compared to the prior year period,periods, was primarily attributabledue to higher outstanding debt balances duringin the current year offsetresulting byfrom lowerborrowings interestused rates.to finance acquisitions completed in both periods.
Income Tax Expense. The Company’s effective income tax raterates waswere 23.3%26.2% and 24.1%24.8% for the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2025,2026, respectively, and 19.9%26.0% and 21.5%23.0% for the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2024,2025, respectively. The effective tax rates for the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20252026 and 20242025 differ from the statutory rate of 21.0% primarily due to state income taxes offset by research and development tax credits and stock-based compensation.credits.
As of DecemberMarch 31, 2025,2026, the Company had total backlog of $32.8$33.4 billion, compared to $31.8$31.4 billion a year ago, an increase of 3.1%.6.4%. Funded backlog as of DecemberMarch 31, 20252026 was $4.4$5.0 billion. The total backlog consists of remaining performance obligations (see Note 5) plus unexercised options.
The Company has a $3,250.0 million senior secured credit facility (the Credit Facility), which consists of the Revolving Facility and a $1,250.0 million term loan facility (the Term Loan). As of DecemberMarch 31, 2025,2026, therethe wereCompany nohad outstanding$1,072.0 borrowingsmillion of undrawn capacity under the Revolving Facility,Facility and no borrowings on the swing line,line and stand-by letters of credit.
The Company also has the secured term loan (the Term Loan B Facility) and the senior unsecured notes (the 2033 Notes), with principal amounts of $750.0 million and $1,000.0 million, respectively.
To provide additional financial flexibility for the Company, in connection with the ARKA Group L.P. acquisition, the Company entered into a commitment letter (the Commitment Letter), dated December 19, 2025, with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (Wells Fargo), pursuant to which Wells Fargo committed to provide a senior secured bridge loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to $1,300.0 million. As of December 31, 2025, no amounts were funded pursuant to the Commitment Letter.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $164.6 million for the six months ended December 31, 2025, compared to the six months ended December 31, 2024, primarily due to the earnings increase of $107.2 million after adding back non-cash adjustments and $57.4 million of net favorable changes in working capital driven by increased cash collections.
Net cash usedprovided inby investingoperating activities decreasedincreased by $1,571.3$117.4 million for the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2025,2026, compared to the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2024,2025, primarily due to higher cashnet usedincome in acquisitions inand the priordeduction year.of domestic research and development costs pursuant to tax provisions enacted by the OBBBA.
Net cash providedused in investing activities increased by financing activities decreased by $1,464.0$1,007.8 million for the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2025,2026, compared to the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2024,2025, primarily due to higher proceedscash fromused borrowingsfor acquisitions in the priorcurrent year.
Net cash provided by financing activities increased by $855.8 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2026, compared to the nine months ended March 31, 2025, primarily due to an increase in net borrowings under the Credit Facility, the Term Loan B-2, and the 2033 Notes-2 offset by a decrease in stock repurchase activity.
We believe that the combination of internally generated funds, available bank borrowings, and cash and cash equivalents on handhand, internally generated funds, and available bank borrowings will provide the required liquidity and capital resources necessary to fund on-going operations, customary capital expenditures, debt service obligations, and other working capital requirements over the next twelve months. We may in the future seek to borrow additional amounts under existing debt instruments or new debt instruments. Over the longer term, our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations necessary to fulfill theour long-term debt obligations under the Credit Facility, Term Loan B Facility, 2033 Notes, and any other indebtedness we may incur will depend on our future financial performance which will be affected by many factors outside of our control, including current worldwide economic conditions and financial market conditions.
CACI insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 1 filing (1 insider, 1 trade date, 264 shares, about $132.1K). Net open-market shares: -264 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$132.1K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | Koegel J William Jr |
Option exercise | 3,186 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Koegel J William Jr |
Shares withheld for tax | 1,561 | $627.06 | $978.8K |
| 2026-10-01 | Koegel J William Jr |
Option exercise | 532 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Koegel J William Jr |
Shares withheld for tax | 182 | $627.06 | $114.1K |
| 2026-10-01 | Koegel J William Jr |
Option exercise | 330 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Koegel J William Jr |
Shares withheld for tax | 162 | $627.06 | $101.6K |
| 2026-10-01 | Koegel J William Jr |
Option exercise | 323 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Koegel J William Jr |
Shares withheld for tax | 159 | $627.06 | $99.7K |
| 2026-10-01 | Norcross James F. |
Option exercise | 1,036 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Norcross James F. |
Shares withheld for tax | 336 | $627.06 | $210.7K |
| 2026-10-01 | Norcross James F. |
Option exercise | 173 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Norcross James F. |
Shares withheld for tax | 53 | $627.06 | $33.2K |
| 2026-10-01 | Norcross James F. |
Option exercise | 107 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Norcross James F. |
Shares withheld for tax | 49 | $627.06 | $30.7K |
| 2026-10-01 | Norcross James F. |
Option exercise | 104 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Norcross James F. |
Shares withheld for tax | 47 | $627.06 | $29.5K |
| 2026-10-01 | Lutsey Meisha |
Option exercise | 2,550 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Lutsey Meisha |
Shares withheld for tax | 1,115 | $627.06 | $699.2K |
| 2026-10-01 | Lutsey Meisha |
Option exercise | 425 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Lutsey Meisha |
Shares withheld for tax | 128 | $627.06 | $80.3K |
| 2026-10-01 | Lutsey Meisha |
Option exercise | 264 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Lutsey Meisha |
Shares withheld for tax | 120 | $627.06 | $75.2K |
| 2026-10-01 | Lutsey Meisha |
Option exercise | 258 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Lutsey Meisha |
Shares withheld for tax | 117 | $627.06 | $73.4K |
| 2026-10-01 | Maclauchlan Jeffrey D |
Option exercise | 6,372 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Maclauchlan Jeffrey D |
Shares withheld for tax | 3,126 | $627.06 | $2.0M |
| 2026-10-01 | Maclauchlan Jeffrey D |
Option exercise | 1,062 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Maclauchlan Jeffrey D |
Shares withheld for tax | 521 | $627.06 | $326.7K |
| 2026-10-01 | Maclauchlan Jeffrey D |
Option exercise | 659 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Maclauchlan Jeffrey D |
Shares withheld for tax | 324 | $627.06 | $203.2K |
| 2026-10-01 | Maclauchlan Jeffrey D |
Option exercise | 646 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Maclauchlan Jeffrey D |
Shares withheld for tax | 317 | $627.06 | $198.8K |
| 2026-10-01 | Weir Tracy |
Option exercise | 638 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Weir Tracy |
Shares withheld for tax | 300 | $627.06 | $188.1K |
| 2026-10-01 | Weir Tracy |
Option exercise | 107 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Weir Tracy |
Shares withheld for tax | 51 | $627.06 | $32.0K |
| 2026-10-01 | Weir Tracy |
Option exercise | 87 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Weir Tracy |
Shares withheld for tax | 41 | $627.06 | $25.7K |
| 2026-10-01 | Weir Tracy |
Option exercise | 96 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Weir Tracy |
Shares withheld for tax | 46 | $627.06 | $28.8K |
| 2026-10-01 | Mengucci John S |
Option exercise | 33,448 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Mengucci John S |
Shares withheld for tax | 15,086 | $627.06 | $9.5M |
| 2026-10-01 | Mengucci John S |
Option exercise | 5,575 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Mengucci John S |
Shares withheld for tax | 2,515 | $627.06 | $1.6M |
| 2026-10-01 | Mengucci John S |
Option exercise | 3,956 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Mengucci John S |
Shares withheld for tax | 1,785 | $627.06 | $1.1M |
| 2026-10-01 | Mengucci John S |
Option exercise | 4,205 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Mengucci John S |
Shares withheld for tax | 1,897 | $627.06 | $1.2M |
| 2026-10-01 | Blazer Eric |
Option exercise | 66 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Blazer Eric |
Shares withheld for tax | 20 | $627.06 | $12.5K |
| 2026-10-01 | Blazer Eric |
Option exercise | 64 | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 | Blazer Eric |
Shares withheld for tax | 20 | $627.06 | $12.5K |
| 2026-07-30 | Disbrow Lisa S |
Grant/award | 58 | — | — |
| 2026-07-13 | Szews Charles L |
Option exercise | 85 | — | — |
| 2026-07-13 | Nolan Philip O |
Option exercise | 85 | — | — |
| 2026-07-13 | Morrison Scott C |
Option exercise | 85 | — | — |
| 2026-07-13 | Sloane Stanton D |
Option exercise | 85 | — | — |
| 2026-07-13 | Disbrow Lisa S |
Option exercise | 123 | — | — |
| 2026-07-13 | Mccarthy Ryan D |
Option exercise | 85 | — | — |
| 2026-07-13 | Plunkett Debora A |
Option exercise | 85 | — | — |
Well-known investors holding CACI (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 165,731 | $76.8M | 0.05% | Added 178% |
| D. E. Shaw & Co. | 2026-06-30 | 157,665 | $73.0M | 0.05% | Added 12554% |
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 109,224 | $50.0M | 0.02% | Reduced 51% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 94,783 | $43.9M | 0.03% | Added 1214% |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 32,597 | $17.7M | — | Sold out |
| Gotham Asset Management (Joel Greenblatt) | 2026-06-30 | 33,112 | $15.3M | 0.04% | Reduced 24% |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 8,553 | $4.0M | 0.0% | Reduced 8% |
| Bridgewater Associates | 2026-06-30 | 5,315 | $2.9M | — | Sold out |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 1,958 | $907.1K | 0.0% | New position |