CDIO 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Cardio Diagnostics Holdings, Inc. (also CDIOW) · Nasdaq · In Vitro & In Vivo Diagnostic Substances · CIK 1870144 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “The healthcare commercialization process is inherently lengthy and subject to regulatory, reimbursement, evidentiary and behavioral factors, which, combined with clinical adoption of novel diagnostic technologies that frequently spans multiple years, results in a lengthy period from initial development to widespread utilization and ultimately to revenue generation, which, in some cases, may span a decade or more.”
New heading “If the FDA were to begin actively regulating our tests or software, we could incur substantial costs and delays associated with trying to obtain premarket 510(k) clearance, de novo classification, or premarket approval and incur costs associated with complying with post-market controls.”
Removed heading “We rely on a limited number of suppliers, contract manufacturers, and logistics providers, and our test is performed by a single contract high complexity Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) laboratory.”
Removed heading “The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s ("FDA’s”) newly-issued rule for laboratory developed tests ("LDTs”), which will be phased in over a period of four years, will significantly change the regulatory landscape for LDTs. Unless the rule is overturned by a court or Congress, our currently marketed LDTs and those we develop in the future will be subject to new requirements which may include, for some tests, premarket clearance, de novo authorization or premarket approval. We will incur substantial costs and delays associated with complying with the new rule.”
Removed heading “We are an “emerging growth company,” and we cannot be certain that the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to “emerging growth companies” will not make our Common Stock less attractive to investors.”
Removed heading “As a “smaller reporting company” we are permitted to provide less disclosure than larger public companies which may make our Common Stock less attractive to investors.”
Removed heading “Risk Management and Strategy”
Largest changes
“On May 6, 2024, FDA published a final rule amending the definition of an in vitro diagnostic (“IVD”) device to include tests manufactured by a clinical laboratory. Pursuant to the rule LDTs, i.e., tests designed, manufactured, and used within a single CLIA-certified high complexity laboratory, are medical devices subject to FDA regulation under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The final rule also announced FDA’s intention to apply its medical device requirements to LDTs. …”see in full comparison
“Unless overturned by a court or Congress, or stayed or withdrawn by the new Administration, the final rule will substantially increase costs and regulatory burdens for many clinical laboratories in ways that may adversely affect their ability to develop, perform, and offer LDTs. …”see in full comparison
“The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s ("FDA’s”) newly-issued rule for laboratory developed tests ("LDTs”), which will be phased in over a period of four years, will significantly change the regulatory landscape for LDTs. Unless the rule is overturned by a court or Congress, our currently marketed LDTs and those we develop in the future will be subject to new requirements which may include, for some tests, premarket clearance, de novo authorization or premarket approval. We will incur substantial costs and delays associated with complying with the new rule.”see in full comparison
“We rely on a limited number of suppliers, contract manufacturers, and logistics providers, and our test is performed by a single contract high complexity Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) laboratory.”see in full comparison
“For our Epi+Gen CHD™ and PrecisionCHD™ tests, we and our vendors rely on a limited number of suppliers for laboratory reagents and sampling kit supplies, contract manufacturers, and logistics providers. For example, certain proprietary reagents are manufactured under Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) by a single contract manufacturer located in Michigan; the blood collection tubes included in the sample collection kits are manufactured by a single manufacturer; and the tests are performed in one high complexity CLIA laboratory located in Missouri. …”see in full comparison
There can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the continued listing standards ofsee in full comparisonNasdaq.Nasdaq, and delisting of our securities could become more likely if a proposed Nasdaq rule currently being considered is adopted, as expected .
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (68)
Investing in our securities involves risks. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K before making an investment in our Common Stock. Our business, financial condition, results of operations, or prospects could be materially and adversely affected if any of these risks occurs, and as a result, the market price of our Common Stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment. This Annual Report on Form 10-K also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. See “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” Our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth below. These disclosures reflect the Company’s beliefs and opinions as to factors that could materially and adversely affect the Company and its securities in the future. References to past events are provided by way of example only and are not intended to be a complete listing or a representation as to whether or not such factors have occurred in the past or their likelihood of occurring in the future.
The healthcare commercialization process is inherently lengthy and subject to regulatory, reimbursement, evidentiary and behavioral factors, which, combined with clinical adoption of novel diagnostic technologies that frequently spans multiple years, results in a lengthy period from initial development to widespread utilization and ultimately to revenue generation, which, in some cases, may span a decade or more.
The commercialization lifecycle for diagnostic tests is lengthy and generally involves multiple stages, including scientific validation, regulatory compliance, the securing of third-party reimbursement, including coverage determination from government programs including the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) and subsequently, from commercial payors, physician adoption and incorporation into clinical guidelines and behavioral and workflow integration as health care providers gain familiarity and comfort with new technologies. These various stages can each take many years, and the entire process from scientific discovery to broad clinical adoption frequently can extend over a decade. Despite having two clinically promising diagnostic tests currently available and more tests in the pipeline, we expect that our revenue growth will continue to be negligible until we have obtained third party reimbursement for our tests, the tests are incorporated into the broader health care clinical guidelines and are integrated into medical care workflow by health care providers. There is no assurance that we will be successful in achieving those milestones and begin growing meaningful revenue. We also cannot provide assurance that we will ever achieve profitability even as we grow revenue.
We believe our long-term value as a company will be greater if we focus on growth, which has in the past, and may continue to negatively impact our results of operations in the near term.
Our business and the markets in which we operate
are new
and rapidly evolving, which makesmake it difficult to evaluate our future prospects and the risks and challenges we may encounter.
Our limited
operating history makemakes it difficult
to evaluate our future prospects and the risks and challenges we may encounter.
In addition, as a business with a limited operating
operating history, we may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other known and unknown challenges. We
are may not
be successful at commercialization, sales and marketing and, as a result, our business may be adversely affected.
Further, although our revenues currently are only nominal, once we achieve traction, in any future period, our revenue growth could slow or our revenues could decline for a number of reasons, including slowing demand for our tests and services, increasing competition, a decrease in the growth of our overall market, or our failure, for any reason, to continue to capitalize on growth opportunities. In addition, our growth rate may slow in the future as our market penetration rates increase. As a result, our revenues, operating results and cash flows may fluctuate significantly on a quarterly basis and revenue growth rates may not be sustainable and may decline in the future, and we may not be able to achieve or sustain profitability in future periods, which could harm our business and cause the market price of our Common Stock to decline.
We expect to spend significant
amounts to expand
our existing operations, including expansion into new geographies, to make additional key hires, to expand our sales
channels and constituencies
and to develop new tests and services. Since 2024, our primary source of capital has been sales of our Common Stock under our at-the-market
agreement with Craig-Hallum Capital Group, LLC (the “ATM Agreement”). If we are unable to raise additional capital,capital under the
ATM Agreement or otherwise, we may need to delay
the timing of, or scale back, certain aspects of our business plan and operations. The
estimate and our expectation regarding the sufficiency
of funds to continue our business plan and operations are based on assumptions
that may prove to be wrong, and we could use our available
capital resources sooner than we currently expect. Until such time, if ever,
as we can generate sufficient revenues, we mayexpect to finance our
cash needs through a combination of equity offerings and debt financings
or other sources. In addition, we may seek additional capital
due toin the event of favorable market conditions or strategic considerations,
even if we believe that we have sufficient funds for our current or future
operating plans.
Our ML/AI powering our technology
and products,
there are known risks of with the use of ML/AI including accuracy, bias, toxicity, privacy, security and data provenance. Developing,
Developing, testing and deploying ML/AI systems may also increase the cost of our offerings. Our failure to adequately address potential
risks relating
to the use of ML/AI in our technology and solutions could result in litigation regarding, among other things, intellectual
property, privacy
and other claims that could result in liability for our company. It may also result in new or increased governmental
or regulatory scrutiny,
which could result in regulatory action, legal liabilities, regulatory penalties, and damage to our reputation,
potentially harming our
business and financial condition. The use of our AI capabilities could raise ethical or social concerns and our
failure to adequately
address these concerns or the failure of our competitors, clients or other end users to do so could negatively impact
our brand and reputation.
We rely
on a limited number of suppliers, contract manufacturers, and logistics providers, and our test is performed by a single contract high
complexity Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) laboratory.
For our Epi+Gen CHD™ and
PrecisionCHD™ tests, we and our vendors rely on a limited number of suppliers for laboratory reagents and sampling kit supplies,
contract manufacturers, and logistics providers. For example, certain proprietary reagents are manufactured under Good Manufacturing Practice
(GMP) by a single contract manufacturer located in Michigan; the blood collection tubes included in the sample collection kits are manufactured
by a single manufacturer; and the tests are performed in one high complexity CLIA laboratory located in Missouri. The reliance on a limited
number of suppliers and a sole contract manufacturer and laboratory present various risks. These include the risk that in the event of
an interruption from any part of our supply chain for any reason, such as a natural catastrophe, labor dispute, or system interruption.
We may not be able to develop an alternate source without incurring material additional costs and substantial delays. For example, during
2021, the Coronavirus pandemic impacted the ability to conduct in-person training of personnel at the laboratory, which delayed the launch
of Epi+Gen CHD™ by approximately two and a half months. As a public company, the delay of a product launch by a nearly a fiscal
quarter could cause our reported results of operations to fail to meet market expectations, which, in turn, and could negatively impact
our stock price.
While we have implemented and
is are continuing to
implement procedures and safeguards that are designed to prevent security breaches and cyber attacks,cyberattacks, they may not be
able to protect against
all attempts to breach our systems, and we may not become aware in a timely manner of any such security breach.
Unauthorized access to
or security breaches of our platform, network or computer systems, or those of our technology service providers,
could result in the loss
of business, reputational damage, regulatory investigations and orders, litigation, indemnity obligations, damages
for contract breach,
civil and criminal penalties for violation of applicable laws, regulations or contractual obligations and significant
costs, fees and
other monetary payments for remediation. If customers believe that our platform does not provide adequate security for
the storage of
sensitive information or its transmission over the Internet, our business will be harmed. Customers’ concerns about
security or
privacy may deter them from using our solutions for activities that involve personal or other sensitive information.
Concerns over inflation,
energy costs, geopolitical
issues, including the ongoing conflict between Russian and Ukraine,Ukraine and the recent commencement of hostilities in Iran, unstable global
credit markets and financial
conditions, and volatile oil prices could lead to periods of significant economic instability, diminished
liquidity and credit availability,
declines in consumer confidence and discretionary spending, diminished expectations for the global
economy and expectations of slower
global economic growth going forward. For example, in March 2022, the U.S. Consumer Price Index (“CPI”), which measures a
wide-ranging basket of goods and services, rose 8.5% from the same month a year ago, which represents the largest CPI increase since December
of 1981. Our general business strategy may be adversely affected by any
such inflationary fluctuations, economic downturns, volatile business
environments and continued unstable or unpredictable economic and
market conditions.
Compliance with changing regulation of corporate
governance governance
and public disclosure will result in significant additional expenses.
Changing laws, regulations,
and and
standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure for public companies, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
various various
rules and regulations adopted by the SEC, are creating uncertainty for public companies. Our management will needneeds to invest significant
time and financial resources to comply with both existing and evolving requirements for public companies, which will lead,leads, among other things,
things, to significantly increased general and administrative expenses and a certain diversion of management time and attention from revenue generating
generating activities to compliance activities.
We are highly dependent upon the
talents and services
of a number of key employees, specifically Meeshanthini Dogan, PhD andPhD, Robert Philibert, MD PhD and Timur Dogan, PhD, and other senior technical
technical and management personnel, including our other executive officers, all of whom would be difficult to replace. In 2022, we entered into
into multi-year employment agreements with each of our executive officers and a consulting agreement with our non-executive chairman.
The loss
of the services of one or more of these key employees would disrupt our business and harm its results of operations. As competition is
is intense for the type of highly skilled scientific and medical professionals our business requires, we may not be able to successfully
attract and retain senior leadership necessary to grow our business.
Currently, we have less than 16
15 full and two part-time
employees. Our ability to manage our growth effectively will require us to continue to improve our operational, financial
and management
controls and information systems to accurately forecast sales demand, to manage our operating costs, manage our marketing
programs in
conjunction with an emerging market, and attract, train, motivate and manage our employees effectively. Our growth strategy
will place
significant demands on our management team and our financial, administrative and other resources. Operating results will depend substantially
substantially on the ability of our officers and key employees to manage changing business conditions and to implement and improve its
financial, administrative
and other resources. If management fails to manage the expected growth, our results of operations, financial
condition, business and prospects
could be adversely affected. In addition, our growth strategy may depend on effectively integrating
future entities, which requires cooperative
efforts from the managers and employees of the respective business entities. If we are unable
to respond to and manage changing business
conditions, or the scale of our operations, then the quality of our products and services,
our ability to retain key personnel, and our
business could be harmed, which in turn, could adversely affect our results of operations,
financial condition, business and prospects.
In order to provide our products,
we currently use
a variety of technologies including, for example, genotyping, digital methylation assessment and data processing technologies
owned by
third parties. The terms of these agreements, and any other “open source” software agreements we may rely upon in
the future,
are subject to change without notice and may increase our costs. Moreover, our failure to comply with the terms of one or
more of these
agreements could expose us to business disruption because the license may be terminated automatically due to non- compliance.non-compliance.
To enforce compliance with the
federal laws, the
U.S. Department of Justice and the Office of the Inspector General (“OIG”) have recently increased their scrutiny of healthcare providers,
providers, which has led to a number of investigations, prosecutions, convictions and settlements in the healthcare industry. Dealing
with investigations
can be time- and resource-consuming and can divert management’s attention from the business. Any such investigation
or settlement
could increase our costs or otherwise have an adverse effect on our business. In addition, because of the potential for
large monetary
exposure under the federal False Claims Act, which provides for treble damages and mandatory minimum penalties of $5,500
to $11,000 per
false claim or statement, healthcare providers often resolve allegations without admissions of liability for significant
and material
amounts to avoid the uncertainty of treble damages that may be awarded in litigation proceedings. Such settlements often
contain additional
compliance and reporting requirements as part of a consent decree, settlement agreement or corporate integrity agreement.
Given the significant
size of actual and potential settlements, it is expected that the government will continue to devote substantial
resources to investigating
healthcare providers’ compliance with the healthcare reimbursement rules and fraud and abuse laws.
If the FDA were to begin actively regulating our tests or software, we could incur substantial costs and delays associated with trying to obtain premarket 510(k) clearance, de novo classification, or premarket approval and incur costs associated with complying with post-market controls.
We believe our Epi+Gen CHD™ and PrecisionCHD™ tests are LDTs. The FDA generally considers an LDT to be a test that is designed, manufactured, and used within a single laboratory that is certified under CLIA and meets the regulatory requirements under CLIA to perform high complexity testing. Our laboratories are currently regulated under CLIA and must comply with CAP requirements, and we are subject to extensive federal and state laws and regulations. The FDA issued a final rule in May 2024 that would have subjected many LDTs to regulatory requirements including, in some cases, premarket authorization. A federal district court vacated the FDA final rule in May 2025, holding that LDTs are not subject to FDA regulation. The FDA rescinded the final rule in September 2025. The FDA has not indicated how it will interpret the court ruling or whether it will seek a different regulatory approach with respect to LDTs or components thereof. In June 2025, Congress re-introduced the Verifying Accurate, Leading-edge IVCT Development Act (“VALID Act”) to establish a new risk-based regulatory framework for in vitro clinical tests (“IVCTs”), including IVDs, LDTs, collection devices and instruments used with such tests. This legislation was previously introduced in 2021 and 2023.
If the FDA were to develop an alternate approach to regulating LDTs, or if Congress were to enact legislation giving FDA authority to regulate our current or future LDTs, or any components, materials, or software we use in our tests we could be forced to stop selling our tests or be required to modify claims for or make other changes to our tests while we or our suppliers work to comply with FDA requirements including, potentially, premarket authorization. Our business could be adversely affected while such review was ongoing and if we or our supplier were ultimately unable to obtain such authorization. Completing such submissions would require the expenditure of time, attention and financial and other resources, and may not yield the desired results, which could delay, limit or prevent regulatory authorization.
We also believe that our Actionable Clinical Intelligence and HeartRisk platform are not subject to regulation by the FDA.In particular, the Actionable Clinical Intelligence platform is offered as a component of the PrecisionCHD LDT which, as noted above, FDA does not have authority to regulate. HeartRisk is intended for use by business leaders as a population health analytics platform and as such does not meet the device definition. If the FDA were to disagree with our position, this could have an adverse impact on our ability to offer our tests and related services. If the FDA required us to obtain marketing authorization for one or more of our platforms, our business could be adversely affected while such review was in process or if we are unable to obtain marketing authorization.
The U.S.
Food and Drug Administration’s ("FDA’s”) newly-issued rule for laboratory developed tests ("LDTs”),
which will be phased in over a period of four years, will significantly change the regulatory landscape for LDTs. Unless the rule is
overturned by a court or Congress, our currently marketed LDTs and those we develop in the future will be subject to new requirements
which may include, for some tests, premarket clearance, de novo authorization or premarket approval. We will incur substantial costs
and delays associated with complying with the new rule.
We believe
our Epi+Gen CHD™ and PrecisionCHD™ tests are LDTs. The FDA generally considers an LDT to be a test that is designed, manufactured,
and used within a single laboratory that is certified under CLIA and meets the regulatory requirements under CLIA to perform high complexity
testing The FDA has
historically taken the position that it has the authority to regulate LDTs as in-vitro diagnostics ("IVDs”) under the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ("FDC Act”), although it has generally exercised enforcement discretion with regard to LDTs.
This means that even though the FDA believes it can impose regulatory requirements on LDTs, such as requirements to obtain premarket
approval, de novo authorization or clearance of LDTs, it has generally chosen not to enforce those requirements.
On May 6,
2024, FDA published a final rule amending the definition of an in vitro diagnostic (“IVD”) device to include tests manufactured
by a clinical laboratory. Pursuant to the rule LDTs, i.e., tests designed, manufactured, and used within a single CLIA-certified high
complexity laboratory, are medical devices subject to FDA regulation under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The final rule also
announced FDA’s intention to apply its medical device requirements to LDTs. Under the final rule, all LDTs, unless subject to a
specific exemption, will be subject to premarket authorization requirements (510(k), de novo classification, or PMA) for each LDT performed
by the laboratory, and to postmarket registration and listing, medical device reporting, correction, removal, and recall, complaint handling,
labeling, investigational device, and quality system requirements. FDA intends to phase in these requirements beginning May 6, 2025.
The final rule states that certain categories of LDTs will be subject to enforcement discretion with respect to some or all of these
requirements. For example, FDA will apply enforcement discretion to currently marketed LDTs that were first offered prior to May 6, 2024,
with respect to most quality system requirements and the requirement for premarket authorization if they are not modified or modified
in only limited ways. Laboratories performing these tests are subject to other requirements, including the requirement to submit the
labeling for the LDT to FDA for review. FDA will similarly exercise enforcement discretion with respect to premarket authorization for
LDTs approved by the New York State Clinical Laboratory Evaluation Program (“NYS-CLEP”).
Unless overturned
by a court or Congress, or stayed or withdrawn by the new Administration, the final rule will substantially increase costs and regulatory
burdens for many clinical laboratories in ways that may adversely affect their ability to develop, perform, and offer LDTs. Two lawsuits
challenging FDA’s authority to regulate LDTs have been filed in federal court: the American Clinical Laboratory Association filed
a lawsuit against FDA on May 29, 2024 in the Eastern District of Texas, while the Association for Molecular Pathology filed a lawsuit
on August 19, 2024 in the Southern District of Texas. The ultimate success of these lawsuits, which were subsequently consolidated, or
any future lawsuits that may be brought against the FDA challenging the LDT rule, is uncertain. It is also unclear whether a court would
delay the implementation of the final rule while the litigation is ongoing, which means we may need to initiate steps to comply with
the final rule even if it is ultimately overturned.
Legislative
proposals addressing the FDA’s oversight of LDTs have been previously introduced. In June 2021, Congress introduced the VALID Act,
which would have established a new risk-based regulatory framework for in vitro clinical tests (“IVCTs”), a category which
would have included IVDs, LDTs, collection devices and instruments used with such tests. FDA’s new LDT final rule may renew attention
to the VALID Act or other legislation and may lead to the introduction of new proposals to limit the FDA’s regulatory authority.
On July 12, 2024, the House Appropriations Committee issued a Report accompanying a FY 2025 appropriations bill in which it directed
the FDA to suspend efforts to implement the LDT final rule and to continue working with Congress to modernize the regulatory approach
for LDTs. This directive is not binding on the FDA.
The change
in Administration and in Congress could significantly affect FDA’s ability to implement the final rule or to otherwise regulate
LDTs. For example, the Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees FDA, could stay enforcement of the rule or seek to rescind
the final rule, or could direct FDA to not regulate LDTs as medical devices. Separately, Congress could enact legislation aimed at preventing
FDA from regulating LDTs and/or assigning oversight of LDTs to a different agency.
Various bills
have been introduced in Congress seeking to substantially revamp the regulation of both LDTs and IVDs, but no legislation has been enacted
thus far.
We currently do not have broad-based
coverage and
reimbursement for the Epi+Gen CHD™ and PrecisionCHD™ tests. However, our strategy is to expand access to our
tests by pursuing
coverage and reimbursement by third-party payors, including government payors. Coverage and reimbursement by third-party
payors, including
managed care organizations, private health insurers, and government healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid
in the United States
and similar programs in other countries, for the types of risk assessment and detection tests we perform can be limited
and uncertain.
Healthcare providers may not order our products unless third-party payors cover and provide adequate reimbursement for
a substantial portion
of the price of the products. If we are not able to obtain adequate coverage and an acceptable level of reimbursement
for our products
from third-party payors, there could be a greater co-insurance or co- paymentco-payment obligation for any individual for whom
a test is ordered.
The individual may be forced to pay the entire cost of a test out-of-pocket, which could dissuade physicians from ordering
our products
and, if ordered, could result in delay in or decreased likelihood of collection of payment.
If eligible for reimbursement,
laboratory tests such as ours generally are classified for reimbursement purposes under CMS’s Healthcare Common Procedure Coding
System (“HCPCS”) and the American Medical Association’s (“AMA”) Current Procedural Terminology (“CPT”)
coding systems. We and payors must use those coding systems to bill and pay for our diagnostic tests, respectively. These HCPCS and CPT
codes are associated with the particular product or service that is provided to the individual. Accordingly, without a HCPCS or CPT code
applicable to our products, the submission of claims could be a significant challenge. Once CMS creates an HCPCS code or the AMA establishes
a CPT code, CMS establishes payment rates and coverage rules under traditional Medicare, and private payors establish rates and coverage
rules independently. Under Medicare, payment for laboratory tests is generally made under the Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule (“CLFS”)
with payment amounts assigned to specific HCPCS and CPT codes. In addition, effective January 1, 2018, a new Medicare payment methodology
went into effect for clinical laboratory tests, under which laboratory-reported private payor rates are used to establish
Medicare payment
rates for tests reimbursed via the CLFS. The newThis methodology implements Section 216 of the Protecting Access to Medicare
Act of 2014 (“PAMA”)
and requires laboratories that meet certain requirements related to volume and type of Medicare revenues
to report to CMS their private
payor payment rates for each test they perform, the volume of tests paid at each rate, and the HCPCS code
associated with the test. CMS
uses the reported information to set the Medicare payment rate for each test at the weighted median private
payor rate. The full impact
of the PAMA rate-setting methodology and its applicability to our products remains uncertain at this time.
In addition, U.S. states
are adopting new laws or
amending existing laws and regulations, requiring attention to frequently changing regulatory requirements applicable
to data related
to individuals. For example, California has enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”). The CCPA
gives California
residents expanded rights to access and delete their personal information, opt out of certain personal information sharing
and receive
detailed information about how their personal information is used by requiring covered companies to provide new disclosures
to California
consumers (as that term is broadly defined and which can include any of our current or future employees who may be California residents
residents or any other California residents whose data we collect or process) and provide such residents new ways to opt out of certain
sales of
personal information. The CCPA provides for civil penalties for violations, as well as a private right of action for data breaches that
that is expected to increase data breach litigation. As we expand our operations and customer base, the CCPA may increase our compliance costs
costs and potential liability. Additionally, the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”), which was approved by California voters
voters in the election in November 2020, created obligations relating to consumer data with implementing regulations that, although delayed,
did take effect during 2024. The CPRA modifies the CCPA significantly, potentially resulting in further uncertainty and requiring us to
incur additional costs and expenses in an effort to comply. Additionally, otherabout 20 U.S. states continuehave to propose, and in certain cases
adopt,adopted, privacy-focused legislation
such as Colorado, Virginia, Utah and Connecticut. Aspects of these state laws remain unclear, resulting
in further uncertainty and potentially
requiring us to modify our data practices and policies and to incur substantial additional costs
and expenses in an effort to comply.
We are an “emerging growth
company”
as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Securities Act, as modified by the Jumpstart our Business Startups Act (the “JOBS Act. Act”).
As such, we are eligible for and intend
to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to other public companies
that are not emerging
growth companies for as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, including, but not limited to, (a)
not being required to
comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”),
(b) reduced disclosure obligations regarding
executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements and (c) exemptions from
the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory
vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments
not previously approved. As a result, our stockholders
may not have access to certain information they may deem important. We will remain
an emerging growth company until the earliest of (i)
the last day of the fiscal year in which the market value of shares of Common Stock that are held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million
as of June 30 of that fiscal year, (ii) the last day of the fiscal year in which we have total annual gross revenue of $1.07 billion or
more during such fiscal year (as indexed for inflation), (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible
debt in the prior three-year period or (iv) December 31, 2026, which is the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary
of the date
of the first sale of Common Stock in Mana’s initial public offering. We cannot predict whether investors have found or will continue
to find our
securities less attractive because it will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our securities less attractive
as a result
of our reliance on these exemptions, the trading prices of our securities may be lower than they otherwise would be, there
may be a less
active trading market for our securities and the trading prices of our securities may be more volatile.
Further, Section 102(b)(1)
of the JOBS Act exempts
emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until
private companies (that
is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class
of securities registered
under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS
Act provides that a company
can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-
emergingnon-emerging growth companies but
any such election to opt out is irrevocable. We have elected not to opt out of such extended transition
period, which means that when
a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies,
we, as an emerging growth company,
can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard.
This may make comparison of our
financial statements with another public company that is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging
growth company that has opted
out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences
in accounting standards used.
However, once we lose emerging growth company status on December 31, 2026, we will lose this exemption and will be required to adopt revised
or new accounting standards on the time schedule applicable to non-emerging growth companies.
Additionally,
we are
a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K.S-K and a non-accelerated filer. Smaller reporting
companies may take
advantage of certain reduced disclosure obligations, including, among other things, providing only two years of audited
financial statements.statements and reduced executive compensation disclosure. In addition, as a non-accelerated filer and smaller reporting company,
we will continue to be exempt from complying with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley. We expect that
we will remain a smaller reporting company until the last day of any fiscal year for so long as either (a) the market
value of our Common
Stock held by non-affiliates does not equal or exceed $250 million as of the prior June 30th, or (b) our annual revenues
did not equal
or exceed $100 million during such completed fiscal year and the market value of our Common Stock held by non-affiliates
did not equal
or exceed $700 million as of the prior June 30th. To the extent we take advantage of such reduced disclosure obligations,
it may also
make comparison of our financial statements with other public companies difficult or impossible.
The stock market hasgenerally, as well as our Common
Stock in particular, have recently
experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. The market prices of securities of companies have
experienced fluctuations that often
have been unrelated or disproportionate to their operating results. In the past, stockholders have
sometimes instituted securities class
action litigation against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of their
securities. Any similar litigation against
us could result in substantial costs, divert management’s attention and resources, and
harm its business, financial condition, and
results of operations.
We have listed our Common Stock
and Warrants on
Nasdaq under the symbols “CDIO” and “CDIOW,” respectively. We cannot assure you that an active
trading market
for itsour Common Stock willcan be created or sustained. Accordingly, we cannot assure you of the liquidity of any trading market,
your ability to sell
your shares of our Common Stock when desired or the prices that you may obtain for your shares.
We have filed, and
the SEC has
declared effective, registration statements covering (i) the resale of Common Stock underlying Public Warrants issued in the
Company’s Company’s
initial public offering and a substantial number of shares of Common Stock and shares underlying warrants issued in private
placements placements
we completed prior to our Business Combination; (ii) up to $17 million in securities on a shelf registration statement that
was used for
an at-the-market offering of up to $17 million; (iii) up to $9,476,508 in securities on a shelf registration statement that
we are currently
using for an at-the-market offering of up to $9,476,508; and (iii) a registration statement on Form S-8 covering our 2022
Equity Incentive
Plan. Public sales of securities can continue to be made under these registration statements.statements, Weand also plan to file(iv) a registration
statement statement
covering the resale of Common Stock and shares underlying warrants that we recentlywere sold in a private placement.placement effected in February
2024. In addition, all of the
shares we issued in the Business Combination to holders of Legacy Cardio securities are available for resale
under Rule 144 without restriction,
subject to certain limitations that apply to our affiliates.
Delaware law and provisions in our Charter and
Bylaws could
make a merger, tender offer, or proxy contest difficult, thereby depressing the trading price of itsour Common Stock.
We currently intend to retain any
future earnings
to finance the operation and expansion of itsour business and we do not expect to declare or pay any dividends in the foreseeable
future.
On January 26,
2024, the Company entered into an
At-the-Market Issuance Sales Agreement (the “Sales Agreement”) with Craig-Hallum Capital
Group LLC (“Craig-Hallum”).
Sales of our Common Stock pursuant to the Sales Agreement were made under the Company’s
Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed
on January 26, 2024 (File No. 333-276725) declared effective by the SEC on February 1, 2024 and
will have been, and may continue to be made made,
under the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on February 7, 2025 (File No. 333-284775) declared effective
by the
SEC on February 14, 2025. As of March 20,13, 2025,2026, we have sold 30,959,4342,251,181 shares of our Common Stock under the Sales Agreement and
may sell
up to $9,476,508another $5,298,889 of our Common Stock through Craig-Hallum under the Sales Agreement.
At a special meeting of stockholders
held on November 15, 2024, our stockholders approved the future issuance of shares of Common Stock and/or securities convertible into
or exercisable for Common Stock equal to 20% or more of the Common Stock outstanding in one or more non-public transactions as required
by Nasdaq Marketplace Listing Rule 5635(d) (the "Share Issuance Proposal”). Any non-public financing transaction undertaken
in connection with this approval will be conducted within the parameters set forth in the Share Issuance Proposal described in the proxy
statement for the Annual Meeting.
We have the ability to redeem
outstanding Public
Warrants and Sponsor Warrants at any time after they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, at a price of
$0.01 per warrant,
provided that the last reported sales price of our Common Stock equals or exceeds $18.00$540.00 per share (as adjusted for
stock splits, stock
dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading-day period
ending on the third
trading day prior to the date on which we give proper notice of such redemption and provided certain other conditions
are met. Trading
prices of our Common Stock have not historically exceeded the $18.00$540.00 per share redemption threshold. If and when the
Public Warrants
and Sponsor Warrants become redeemable, we may not exercise our redemption right unless there is a current registration
statement in effect
with respect to the shares of Common Stock underlying the Warrants. While we have registered the Common Stock issuable
upon the exercise
of the Public Warrants and Sponsor Warrants on a separate registration statementstatement, onmost Formrecently S-1updated thatby wasPost-Effective Amendment No.
3, which the SEC declared effective by the
SEC on JanuarySeptember 24,9, 2023,2025, it must remain current and effective by future filings. There can be no assurance
that the registration statement
will still be effective at the time that we would like to exercise our redemption rights.
As a publicly traded company,
we will incur significant
additional legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a privately company. The obligations
of being a public company
in the United States require significant expenditures and will place significant demands on our management and
other personnel, including
costs resulting from public company reporting obligations under the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations
regarding corporate governance
practices, including those under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”)Sarbanes-Oxley, the Dodd-Frank
Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act,Act (“Dodd Frank”),
and the Nasdaq listing requirementsrequirements. of the stock exchange on which our securities are listed.
These rules require the establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls
and procedures, internal control
over financial reporting and changes in corporate governance practices, among many other complex rules
that are often difficult to implement,
monitor and maintain compliance with. Moreover, despite recent reforms made possible by the JOBS Act,
the reporting requirements, rules,
and regulations will make some activities more time-consuming and costly, particularly after we are
no longer an “emerging growth
company.” In addition, we expect these rules and regulations to make it more difficult and more
expensive for us to obtain director
and officer liability insurance. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial
amount of time to ensure that we
comply with all of these requirements and to keep pace with new regulations, otherwise we may fall out
of compliance and risk becoming
subject to litigation or being delisted, among other potential problems.
We are an “emerging growth company,” and
we cannot be certain that the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to “emerging growth companies” will not make our
Common Stock less attractive to investors.
We are an “emerging growth
company,” as defined under the JOBS Act and will continue to be after the Business Combination is completed. For so long as we are
an emerging growth company, we intend to take advantage of certain exemptions from reporting requirements that are applicable to other
public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including, but not limited to, compliance with the auditor attestation requirements
of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and
proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder
approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.
We could be an emerging growth
company for up to five years from the end of our most recently completed fiscal year, although we may lose such status earlier, depending
on the occurrence of certain events, including when we have generated total annual gross revenue of at least $1.07 billion or when we
are deemed to be a “large accelerated filer” under the Exchange Act, which means that the market value of our Common Stock
that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of December 31st of the prior year, or when we have issued more than $1.0 billion
in nonconvertible debt securities during the prior three-year period.
We cannot predict if investors will
not find our Common Stock less attractive or our company less comparable to certain other public companies because we rely on these exemptions.
If some investors find our Common Stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our Common Stock ,
and our stock price may be more volatile.
Under the JOBS Act, emerging
growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards issued subsequent to the enactment of the JOBS Act until such
time as those standards apply to private companies. We have irrevocably elected not to avail ourselves of this exemption from new or revised
accounting standards and, therefore, will be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are
not emerging growth companies.
As a “smaller
reporting company” we are permitted to provide less disclosure than larger public companies which may make our Common Stock less
attractive to investors.
We are currently a “smaller
reporting company,” as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. As a smaller reporting company, we are eligible to take advantage
of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to other public companies. Consequently, it may be more challenging
for investors to analyze our results of operations and financial prospects which may result in less investor confidence. Investors may
find our Common Stock less attractive as a result of our smaller reporting company status. If some investors find our Common Stock less
attractive, there may be a less active trading market for our Common Stock and our stock price may be more volatile.
There
can be no assurance that we will be able
to comply with the continued listing standards of Nasdaq.Nasdaq, and delisting of our securities could become more likely if a proposed Nasdaq
rule currently being considered is adopted, as expected .
Our Common Stock is listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market ("Nasdaq”). In recent years, Nasdaq has adopted, and currently is proposing, revised standards that could make it more difficult for a small company to maintain its listing. In order to maintain our listing, we must satisfy minimum financial and other requirements including, without limitation, a requirement that the closing bid price of our Common Stock be at least $1.00 per share.. Under Nasdaq’s listing rules, if a company’s security fails to meet the continued listing requirement for minimum bid price of no less than $1.00 for 30 consecutive business days, and the Company has effected a reverse stock split over the prior one-year period; or has effected one or more reverse stock splits over the prior two-year period with a cumulative ratio of 250 shares or more to one, then that company loses eligibility for any additional compliance cure period and risks immediate delisting with respect to that security. The Company effected a reverse stock split on May 12, 2025 in order to cure the $1.00 minimum bid deficiency, making these time periods relevant. In addition, Nasdaq has recently proposed a rule change that if a company’s listed securities fail to have a market value of listed securities (“MVLS”) of at least $5 million for 30 consecutive business days, then Nasdaq will immediately suspend that company’s securities, with delisting to follow without Nasdaq’s historically-customary cure period. The only basis of appeal will be to correct calculation errors, and any suspension will remain in effect during that appeal process. The proposal is subject to SEC approval, which is currently expected in March 2026, and would become effective 60 days thereafter. If the proposal is implemented and becomes effective, our securities will be more vulnerable to being delisted if we are unable to maintain a MVLS of at least $5.0 million. On March 11, 2026, our Common Stock closed at $4.76, so we currently have a MVLS above $5.0 million, but our stock is volatile and could be subject to delisting in the future.
Our Common
Stock is listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market ("Nasdaq”). In order to maintain that listing, we must satisfy minimum financial
and other requirements including, without limitation, a requirement that the closing bid price of our Common Stock be at least $1.00
per share. On June 3, 2024 (the "First Nasdaq Bid Price Letter”), we received a letter from Nasdaq indicating that, for the
previous 30 consecutive business days, the bid price for the Company’s common stock had closed below the minimum $1.00 per share
requirement for continued listing on Nasdaq under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2). In accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A),
the Company was provided an initial period of 180 calendar days, or until December 2, 2024, to regain compliance. As reported on our
Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 4, 2024, Nasdaq notified the Company that Nasdaq’s Staff has determined that the Company
is eligible for an additional 180 calendar day period, or until June 2, 2025, to regain compliance (the "Second Compliance Period”).
As of the date of this report the Common Stock has not regained compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement. If the Company chooses
to implement a reverse stock split, it must complete the split no later than ten business days prior to the end of the Second Compliance
Period in order to timely regain compliance. If we fail to regain compliance with the minimum bid requirement within the extended cure
period, or if we fail to continue to meet all applicable continued listing requirements for Nasdaq in the future, Nasdaq could delist
our securities.
Not applicable.
Risk
Management and Strategy
We have established policies and processes
for assessing, identifying, and managing material risk from cybersecurity threats, and we have integrated these processes into our overall
risk management program. We assess material risks from cybersecurity threats, including any potential unauthorized occurrence on or conducted
through our information systems that may result in adverse effects on the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of our information
systems or any information residing therein.
We have adopted as the governance framework
for our cybersecurity program the Service Organization Control Type 2 (SOC2) and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
(HIPAA). We use this framework as a guide to help us identify, assess, respond to, and manage cybersecurity risks relevant to our business.
Our cybersecurity risk management program includes:
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Revenue Growth and Commercial Adoption Considerations”
New heading “The University of Iowa Research Foundation Exclusive License Agreement”
New heading “Nasdaq Continued Listing Compliance”
Removed heading “Notice of Non-Compliance with Nasdaq Listing Requirements”
Largest changes
“Unless overturned by a court or Congress, or stayed or withdrawn by the new Administration, the final rule will substantially increase costs and regulatory burdens for many clinical laboratories in ways that may adversely affect their ability to develop, perform, and offer LDTs. …”see in full comparison
“Any future failure to maintain compliance could result in deficiency notices and, if not cured, could ultimately lead to delisting, which could adversely affect the liquidity and market value of our common stock and our ability to access the capital markets.”see in full comparison
“If we fail to regain compliance with the minimum bid requirement within the cure period (or extended cure period) or if we fail to continue to meet all applicable continued listing requirements for Nasdaq in the future, Nasdaq could delist our securities.”see in full comparison
“The University of Iowa Research Foundation Exclusive License Agreement”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (68)
As a result of the closing
of the Business Combination,
which was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization in accordance with U.S. GAAP as discussed in Note 2
– Merger Agreement and Reverse Recapitalization,GAAP, the consolidated financial statements of Cardio Diagnostics, Inc., a Delaware corporation
and our wholly owned
subsidiary, are now the financial statements of the Company. You should read the following discussion and analysis
of our financial condition
and results of operations together with our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2024
2025 and 20232024 and for each of
the two years in the period ended December 31, 20242025 and the related notes included in Part II, Item 8 of this
Annual Report.
Cardio was formed to further develop
and commercialize
a series of products for major types of cardiovascular disease and associated co-morbidities, including coronary heart
disease (“CHD”),
stroke, heart failure and diabetes, by leveraging our Artificial Intelligence (“AI”)-driven Integrated
Genetic-EpigeneticMulti-Omics Engine™. As
a company, we aspire to give every American adult insight into their unique risk for various cardiovascular
diseases. Cardio aims to become
one of the leading medical technology companies for enabling improved prevention, early detection and
treatment of cardiovascular disease.
Cardio is transforming the approach to cardiovascular disease from reactive to proactive and hope
to accelerate the adoption of Precision
Medicine for all. We believe that incorporating Cardio’s solutions into routine practice
in primary care and prevention efforts
can help alter the trajectory that nearly one in two Americans is expected to develop some form
of cardiovascular disease by 2035.
Cardio launched its first clinical test, Epi+Gen
CHD™,
a three-year symptomatic CHD risk assessment clinical blood test targeting CHD events, including heart attacks, in 2021 during
the Covid-19
COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, the initial strategy for commercialization involved launching the test via telemedicine and in smaller
provider provider
practices such as concierge medicine practices. The volume of tests through these channels were minimal, and as the circumstances
around around
Covid-19COVID-19 pandemic improved, management re-vamped the Company’s go-to-market strategy to include other healthcare verticals
and and
stakeholders beyond patients and small providers, including larger provider organizations, group purchasing organizations, employers,
payors and life insurers. This new approach allowed Cardio to expand the reach of our solutions beyond the initial focus areas. Beyond
the launch of Epi+Gen CHD, in March 2023, we announced the launch of our second product, PrecisionCHD™, an integrated epigenetic-genetic
clinical blood test for the detection of coronary heart disease. The Epi+Gen CHD™ and PrecisionCHD™ tests areis coupled to
Actionable Clinical Intelligence
(“ACI”), a platform that offers new epigenetic and genetic insights to clinicians prescribing
the to personalize patient management
and help improve chronic care management. In May 2023, we launched CardioInnovate360™, a
research-use-only (“RUO”) solution
to support the discovery, development and validation of novel biopharmaceuticals for the
assessment and management of cardiovascular diseases.
In February 2024, we announced the launch of HeartRisk™, a cardiovascular
disease risk intelligence platform. We believe that our
Epi+Gen CHD™ and PrecisionCHD™ tests are categorized as laboratory-developed
tests, or “LDTs.” The new go-to-market
strategy is also being implemented for these products. Despite long partnership and
sales cycles, in some instance as long as 1424 months,
Cardio washas been able to increase the reachnumber of its solutions in 2024, generating revenue
from provider organizations offering its tests and has continued the development of a more robust
sales and partnership pipeline. ToIn furtherthe increasefiscal reachyear ended December 31, 2025, the focus of the Company remained in driving adoption of our
andclinical potentiallysolutions, acceleratepredominantly partnershipsamong providers, channel partners and salesemployers. cycles,In moreaddition, seasonedthe salesCompany personnelmade progress in theits providerongoing
expansion to additional markets domestically and employerinternationally verticalswith werethe hired.
Infirst additioninternational expansion to increasedIndia, revenuepartnering with channel
partners such as YMCA of East Tennessee and numberSouthdale ofYMCA teststo offer testing to its members and community, and in 2024setting comparedup toour 2023,CLIA other key developments in 2024 and recently, include:laboratory
facility.
Cardio expects that sales and
partnership cycles
will continue to be long.long, especially with the current economic uncertainty. Our ongoing strategy for expanding our business operations
and increasing revenue generation
include the following:
On January 26, 2024, the Company
entered into the
Sales Agreement with Craig-Hallum. Pursuant to the Sales Agreement, the Company
may sell, at its option, shares of its Common Stock through
Craig-Hallum, as sales agent. Sales of the Common Stock were
made pursuant to the Sales Agreement initially up to an aggregate of $17
million under the Company’s Registration Statement
on Form S-3 filed on January 26, 2024 (File No. 333-276725), and declared effective
by the SEC on February 1, 2024 (the “Initial Registration
Statement”),. Additional sales have been, and willmay continue to be made
made, pursuant to the Sales Agreement up to an aggregate of $9,476,508 under the Company’s Registration
Statement on Form S-3 filed
on February 7, 2025 (File No. 333-284775), declared effective by the SEC on February 14, 2025 (the “Additional
Registration Statement”).
and its accompanying Prospectus Supplement dated February 14, 2025. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Sales Agreement, Craig-Hallum
may sell the shares, if any,
only by methods deemed to be an “at the market” offering as defined in Rule 415 promulgated under
the Securities Act. The
Company has agreed to pay Craig-Hallum a sales commission of 2.5% of the gross proceeds for
sales under the Sales
Agreement and to provide Craig-Hallum with customary indemnification and contribution rights, including for liabilities
under the Securities
Act. In addition, the Company is required to reimburse Craig-Hallum for certain specified expenses in connection
with entering into the
Sales Agreement.
In connection with the Sales Agreement, the Company sold 825,268 common shares (24,758,057 prior to the Reverse Stock Split) at various amounts per share to investors for gross proceeds totaling $11,546,949, before deducting sales commissions of $288,921 to placement agent, during the year ended December 31, 2024. The Company also paid the placement agent a fee of $55,000.
During the year ended December 31, 2025, in connection with the Sales Agreement the Company sold 292,495 shares on the post-reverse stock split basis (which includes 206,713 shares that were sold prior to the Reverse Stock Split, originally 6,201,377 shares) of Common Stock at various amounts per share to investors for gross proceeds totaling $3,900,492 before deducting sales commissions of $96,994 to the placement agent. Subsequent to December 31, 2025, the Company sold 1,133,418 shares of Common Stock for gross proceeds totaling $3,788,174 under the At-the-Market Issuance Sales Agreement as of the date of this report.
As of March 13, 2026, we have sold an aggregate 2,251,181 shares of our Common Stock under the Sales Agreement and may sell up to another $5,298,889 of our Common Stock through Craig-Hallum under the Sales Agreement.
As of March 20,
2025, the Company sold 30,959,434 shares of its Common Stock under the Sales Agreement resulting in proceeds to the Company of $14,681,556,
net of offering costs. The Company has paid Craig-Hallum $376,450 in sales commissions. As of March 20, 2025, the Company has not sold
any additional shares of Common Stock under the Additional Registration Statement.
Recent Regulatory and Judicial Developments Regarding LDTs
On May
6, 2024, FDA published a final rule amending
the definition of an in vitro diagnostic (“IVD”) device to include tests manufactured
by a clinical laboratory. Pursuant to
the rule, laboratory developed tests (“LDTs”), i.e., tests designed, manufactured, and
used within a single CLIA-certified
high complexity laboratory, are medical devices subject to FDA regulation under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The final rule
also announced FDA’s intention to apply its medical device requirements to LDTs. Under the
final rule, all LDTs, unless subject
to a specific exemption, willwould be subject to premarket authorization requirements (510(k), de novo
classification, or PMA) for each LDT
performed by the laboratory, and to postmarket registration and listing, medical device reporting,
correction, removal, and recall, complaint
handling, labeling, investigational device, and quality system requirements. FDA intends to
phase in these requirements beginning May
6, 2025. The final rule statesstated that certain categories of LDTs willwould be subject to enforcement
discretion with respect to some or all
of these requirements. For example, FDA willwould apply enforcement discretion to currently marketed
LDTs that were first offered prior to
May 6, 2024, with respect to most quality system requirements and the requirement for premarket
authorization if they are not modified
or modified in only limited ways. Laboratories performing these tests are subject to other requirements,
including the requirement to
submit the labeling for the LDT to FDA for review. FDA willwould similarly exercise enforcement discretion with
respect to premarket authorization
for LDTs approved by the New York State Clinical Laboratory Evaluation Program (“NYS-CLEP”).
On September 19, 2025, the FDA formally rescinded its May 2024 final rule regulating Laboratory Developed Tests (LDTs) as medical devices, following a March 31, 2025, federal court ruling. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas found the FDA exceeded its authority, reverting LDT oversight to Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA). There has been no further pursuit by the current administration.
Unless
overturned by a court or Congress, or stayed or withdrawn by the new Administration, the final rule will substantially increase costs
and regulatory burdens for many clinical laboratories in ways that may adversely affect their ability to develop, perform, and offer
LDTs. Two lawsuits challenging FDA’s authority to regulate LDTs have been filed in federal court: the American Clinical Laboratory
Association filed a lawsuit against FDA on May 29, 2024 in the Eastern District of Texas, while the Association for Molecular Pathology
filed a lawsuit on August 19, 2024 in the Southern District of Texas. The ultimate success of these lawsuits, which were subsequently
consolidated, or any future lawsuits that may be brought against the FDA challenging the LDT rule, is uncertain. It is also unclear whether
a court would delay the implementation of the final rule while the litigation is ongoing, which means we may need to initiate steps to
comply with the final rule even if it is ultimately overturned.
Legislative
proposals addressing the FDA’s oversight of LDTs have been previously introduced. In June 2021, Congress introduced the VALID Act,
which would have established a new risk-based regulatory framework for in vitro clinical tests (“IVCTs”), a category which
would have included IVDs, LDTs, collection devices and instruments used with such tests. FDA’s new LDT final rule may renew attention
to the VALID Act or other legislation and may lead to the introduction of new proposals to limit the FDA’s regulatory authority.
On July 12, 2024, the House Appropriations Committee issued a Report accompanying a FY 2025 appropriations bill in which it directed
the FDA to suspend efforts to implement the LDT final rule and to continue working with Congress to modernize the regulatory approach
for LDTs. This directive is not binding on the FDA.
The change
in Administration and in Congress could significantly affect FDA’s ability to implement the final rule or to otherwise regulate
LDTs. For example, the Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees FDA, could stay enforcement of the rule or seek to rescind
the final rule, or could direct FDA to not regulate LDTs as medical devices. Separately, Congress could enact legislation aimed at preventing
FDA from regulating LDTs and/or assigning oversight of LDTs to a different agency.
Cardio’s
net loss for the year ended December
31, 2025 was $6,498,167 as compared to $8,383,453 for the year ended December 31, 2024, wasa $8,383,453decrease as compared to $8,376,834 for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase
of $6,619$1,885,286 primarily as a result
of ana increasedecrease in General and Administrative expenses.expenses associated with stock compensation issued in
2024.
Cardio has earned only nominal
revenue since inception. Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025 was $34,890
$14,825 compared to $17,065$34,890 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease in revenue is a result
2023.of the conclusion of the Family Medicine Specialists’ Heart Attack Prevention testing initiative.
Additional providers and other organizations are continuing to be onboarded. However, there is a one to three quarter period from onboarding to ramping up usage of tests. The new provider organizations are also smaller and have fewer patients in general than Family Medicine Specialists.
Revenue Growth and Commercial Adoption Considerations
A recurring question from investors is why revenue growth does not immediately follow the development and validation of a clinically promising diagnostic test. While product development may appear straightforward — develop the test, demonstrate its effectiveness, and launch — the path from scientific discovery to broad clinical adoption is complex, highly regulated and typically extended in duration.
The commercialization lifecycle for diagnostic tests generally involves multiple stages:
The Company must conduct rigorous analytical and clinical validation studies to demonstrate the safety, accuracy and clinical utility of its tests. Publication of supporting data and peer-reviewed evidence is often an important component of this process.
Depending on the regulatory pathway, the Company must comply with applicable federal and state regulatory standards. Regulatory processes may involve submissions, inspections, or other oversight requirements that can extend development timelines.
Revenue generation depends significantly on securing third-party reimbursement. Following launch, the Company must obtain coverage determinations from government programs, including the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”), and subsequently from commercial payors. Coverage decisions often require demonstration of clinical utility, cost-effectiveness, and economic value relative to the current standard of care. The timing and scope of reimbursement approvals can materially impact adoption rates and revenue growth.
Broad utilization frequently depends on physician awareness, education and confidence in the test. Adoption may accelerate when professional medical societies incorporate a diagnostic test into clinical guidelines; however, guideline inclusion typically follows the accumulation of substantial clinical evidence over time.
Even when a test is validated, reimbursed and supported by clinical data, integration into established clinical workflows and physician practice patterns can be gradual. Changes in medical practice often occur incrementally as providers gain familiarity and comfort with new technologies.
In summary, the healthcare commercialization process is inherently lengthy and subject to regulatory, reimbursement, evidentiary, and behavioral factors. Broad clinical adoption of novel diagnostic technologies frequently spans multiple years and, in some cases, may require a decade or more from initial development to widespread utilization.
Expenses
related to sales and marketing for the
year ended December 31, 2025 were $766,888 as compared to $1,231,969 for the year ended December 31, 2024, werea $182,446 as compared to $158,514
for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increasedecrease of $23,932.$465,081. The
overall increasedecrease was primarily due to ana increaserestructuring in sales and marketing activity
personnel in 2024 due to tradeshow attendance.2025.
Research
and development expense for the year ended
December 31, 2025 was $641,212 as compared to $227,966 for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $413,246. The overall increase
was $29,125 as compareddue to $145,182an for the year ended December 31,
2023, a decrease of $116,057. The decrease was attributable to the decreaseincrease in laboratoryresearch runsand performeddevelopment personnel in 2024 on new product
offerings in the pipeline as compared to laboratory runs performed in 2023.2025.
General and Administrative Expenses for the year
administrativeended expensesDecember 31, 2025 were $5,025,570 as compared to $6,921,094 for the year ended December 31, 2024, werea $8,169,458 as compared to $ $6,936,646 for the year ended December
31, 2023, an increasedecrease of $1,232,812.$1,895,524. The
overall increasedecrease is primarily due to ana increasedecrease in stock compensation expenses (mainly
as a result of new stock options issued in the
first quarter of 2024), offsetcoupled by the decrease in D&Odirector and officer insurance expense.
General and Administrative Expenses for the year ended December 31, 2025 included payroll and related costs of $1,366,808, rent and other facility costs of $306,591, legal and professional fees of $868,826, consulting and contractor fees of $715,764, insurance expense of $618,998, filing fees of $99,115, transfer agent fees of $62,228, software and web computing expenses of $316,339, board compensation of $198,235, investor relations expenses of $10,133 and general corporate overhead expenses of $462,533.
General and Administrative Expenses for the year ended December 31, 2024 included payroll and related costs of $3,213,917, rent and other facility costs of $224,123, legal and professional fees of $731,209, consulting and contractor fees of $740,516, insurance expense of $714,481, filing fees of $102,514, transfer agent fees of $67,536, software and web computing expenses of $274,515, board compensation of $199,658, investor relations expense of $82,345 and general corporate overhead expenses of $570,280.
We expect our general corporate overhead to remain relatively flat. Additionally, as a public company, we must comply with changing legal and exchange requirements, including as to regulations of the SEC and the continued listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market. We incur annual expenses related to these matters and, among other things, directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, directors’ fees, reporting requirements of the SEC, transfer agent fees, Nasdaq listing fees, auditing and legal fees and similar expenses.
AmortizationThe total amortization expense
for the year ended December 31, 2024, was $19,738, as compared to $19,182 for the year ended
December 31, 2023.2025 was $65,233, consisting of amortization of intangible assets of $5,333 and patent costs of $59,900. The total amortization
expense for the year ended December 31, 2024 includesis the$19,738, amortizationconsisting of intangible assets of $16,000 and patent costs of $3,738, respectively,
as compared to $16,000 for intangible assets and $3,182 for patent costs for the year ended December 31, 2023.$3,738.
Total other expenses
expense for the year ended December
31, 2024,2025 was $(17,57614,089) as compared to $(1,134,37517,576) for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The total other
expenses expense for the year ended December
31, 2025 consists of interest expense of $14,801, net of interest income of $712. The total other expense for the year ended December
31, 2024 consists of interest expense of $18,640$18,640, net of interest income of $1,064. The total other
expenses for the year ended December 31, 2023 consists of interest expense of $6,735,013 offset by gain on extinguishment of debt of $193,350,
change in fair value of derivative liability of $5,406,220 and interest income of $1,068.
Liquidity
describes the ability of a company to
generate sufficient cash flows in the short- and long-term to meet the cash requirements of its
business operations, including working
capital needs, debt service, acquisitions and investments,investments and other commitments and contractual
obligations. We consider liquidity in
terms of cash flows from operations and other sources, and their sufficiency to fund our operatingoperations. Historically, our principal sources
andof investingliquidity activities.have been proceeds from the issuance of equity.
Historically, our principal sources of liquidity
have been proceeds from the issuance of equity.
On January 26, 2024, we entered
into the Sales Agreement
with Craig-Hallum.Craig-Hallum (the “ATM Offering”). Pursuant to the Sales Agreement,Agreement and ATM Offering, we may sell,
at our option, shares
of our Common Stock through Craig-Hallum, as sales agent. Sales of our Common Stock were
made pursuant to the Sales Agreement initially
up to an aggregate of $17 million under thea Initialshelf Registrationregistration Statement,statement declared effective in February 2024 (File No. 333-276725) and have
willbeen, and may continue to be made pursuant to the Sales Agreement up to an aggregate of an additional $9,476,508 under thea Additionalsecond Registrationshelf
registration Statement.statement declared effective in February 2025 (File No. 333-284775).
As of March 20,
2025,13, 2026, we sold 30,959,434an aggregate 2,251,181
shares of our Common Stock on a Reverse Stock Split-adjusted basis under the Sales Agreement resulting in proceeds to usthe Company of $14,681,556,
$18,754,735, net of offering
costs. The Company has paid Craig-Hallum $376,450$480,890 in sales commissions. As of March 20, 2025, the Company has not sold any additional
shares of Common Stock under the Additional Registration Statement.
On February 2, 2024
2024,(pre-dating wethe closed1-for-30 areverse privatestock placementsplit effected in May 2025), in accordance with executed subscription agreements with seven accredited
investors investors,(the whereby“Subscription Agreements”), we issuedclosed aon totalthe sale of 561,793 units ("the “Units”),
with each Unit
consisting of (i) one share of ourthe Company’s common stock, $0.00001 par value (the “Common Stock”) and (ii) one six-yearsix
year Common Stock purchase warrant having(the “Warrants”), which warrants are exercisable until February 2, 2030 at an exercise
price of $1.78 ($53.40 on a post-reverse stock split basis) per share, subject to adjustment (for stock splits, reverse stock splits and
other similar events of recapitalization, including the "Private1-for-30 Placement”).reverse stock split we effected on May 12, 2025. The PrivateUnits Placementwere resultedsold
to the investors in thea issuanceprivate to
investorsplacement ofat 561,793a shares of Common Stock and 561,793 warrants in an unregistered offering of securities. The purchasesale price of the
securities$1.78 was($53.40 $1.78on a post-reverse stock split basis) per Unit,Unit (the “Private
Placement”), resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of $1,000,000, before deducting placement agent fees (10% or
$100,000) and
other offering expenses. We used the net proceeds from the Private Placement for working capital and general corporate purposes. On a
post-reverse stock split basis, the Company issued 18,727 shares and warrants that are exercisable for 18,727 shares, all at an exercise
price of $53.40 per share. We have subsequently registered the Private Placement Common Stock and the Common Stock issuable upon the exercise
of the Private Placement
Warrants on a registration statement on Form S-1 that was declared effective by the SEC on December 3, 2024.2024 and
subsequently on September 19, 2025.
We have had, and expect that
we will continue to
have, an ongoing need to raise additional cash from outside sources to fund our operations and grow our business.business, given the nominal amount
of revenue we have generated since inception, coupled with substantial expenses both for ongoing business operations and to fund expenses
incurred as a public company. We expect that our primary cash needs infor 2025the remainder of 2026 and for the foreseeable future will be for
funding day-to-day operations and working capital
requirements, funding our growth strategy, paying the setup expenses of our internal
laboratory and paying expenses incurred in connection
with our ongoing FDA submission activities. We explore our financing options
on an ongoing basis. However, given recent stock prices
and the extreme volatility of our stock, it continues to be challenging to balance
cash that could be raised and the dilution that might
be required to close a particular transaction. We expect that for the remainder
of 2025,2026, we will rely primarily on the ongoing ATM Offering,
provided that market conditions are favorable.
At our annual stockholders
meetings in December 2023 and November 2024, we obtained stockholder approval to offer and sell up to $10,000,000 in securities (up to
50,000,000 shares of Common Stock, subject to adjustment for stock splits, reverse stock splits and other similar recapitalization events)
in a transaction or series of transactions not involving a public offering for a three-month period together with the potential to obtain
Nasdaq’s consent, which we cannot guarantee, for an additional three-month period thereafter, resulting in a possible six-month
period to conduct a financing within the parameters of the stockholder authority, if granted. We currently have no specific plans for
such an offering but believed having that option available provided our Board of Directors with added flexibility in meeting the Company’s
liquidity needs.
Working capital requirements
are expected to
increase in line with the growth of the business. We have no lines of credit or other bank financing arrangements. We anticipate
anticipate that our principal sources of liquidity, including existing funds and issuancesthe ofATM equity and/or debt,offering will be sufficient to
fund our activities
over the next 12 months. In order to have sufficient cash to fund our operations beyond the next 12 months and grow
our business, we
will need to raise additional funds through the issuance of equity and/or debt. We cannot provide any assurance that
we will be
successful in doing so.
The exercise prices
of our currently outstanding
warrants range from a high of $345 to a low of $53.40 (a high of $11.50 to a low of $1.78 before the Reverse Stock Split) (subject to
adjustment) per share of Common Stock.
The likelihood that warrant holders will exercise their Warrants,warrants, and therefore the amount of
cash proceeds that we might receive, is
dependent upon the trading price of our Common Stock, the last reported sales price for which
was $0.4630$4.76 on March 17,11, 2025.2026. If the trading
price of our Common Stock is less than the respective exercise prices of our outstanding Warrants,
warrants, which has been the case for a substantial
period of time, we believe holders of any of our Warrantswarrants will be unlikely to exercise
their Warrants.warrants. There is no guarantee that the
Warrants warrants will be in the money prior to their respective expiration dates, and as such,
the Warrantswarrants may expire worthless, and we may receive
no proceeds from the exercise of Warrants.warrants. Given the current differential between
the trading price of our Common Stock and the Warrant
exercise prices and the volatility of our stock price, we are not making strategic
business decisions based on an expectation that we
will receive any cash from the exercise of Warrants.warrants. However, we will use any cash
proceeds received from the exercise of Warrantswarrants for
general corporate and working capital purposes, which would increase our liquidity.
We will continue to evaluate the probability of Warrant
warrant exercises and the merit of including potential cash proceeds from the exercise
of the Warrantswarrants in our future liquidity projections.
Cash at December 31, 2024
2025 totaled $7,827,487$5,110,630 as compared to $1,283,523$7,827,487 at December 31, 2023,2024, ana increase decrease
of $6,543,964.
$2,716,857. The following table shows our cash flows from operating activities, investing activities and financing activities for
the stated periods:
Cash used in operating activities for the year ended
activitiesDecember 31, 2025 was $5,726,833, as compared to $4,993,104 for the year ended December 31, 2024, was $4,993,104, as compared to $5,672,175 for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The cash
used in operations during the
year ended December 31, 2024,2025 is a function of net loss of $8,383,453,$6,498,167, adjusted for the following non-cash
operating items: depreciation
of $113,777,$160,063, amortization of $162,568,$238,065 and stock basedstock-based compensation of $2,591,168.$110,235. Operating assets and
liabilities fluctuated as follows:
a an increasedecrease in accounts receivable of $13,652,$10,486, a decrease of $915,969$479,974 in prepaid expenses and other
current assets, aan decreaseincrease of $155,552 $9,781
in accounts payable and accrued expenses and a decrease in lease liability of $223,929.$237,270.
The cash used in
operations during the year ended
December 31, 2023,2024 is a function of net loss of $8,376,834,$8,383,453, adjusted for the following non-cash operating
items: depreciation of $3,790, $113,777,
amortization of $107,830,$162,568, stockand basedstock-based compensation of $1,279,273, and non-cash interest expense of $6,704,522,
offset by a change in fair value of derivative liability of $5,406,220, and a gain on extinguishment of debt of $193,350.$2,591,168. Operating assets
and liabilities fluctuated as follows: an increase
in accounts receivable of $4,960,$13,652, a decrease of $758,669$915,969 in prepaid expenses and other
current assets, an increase in deposits of $7,900, a decrease of $781,500$155,552 in accounts
payable and accrued expenses and ana increasedecrease in
lease liability of $244,505.$223,929.
Cash used in investing activities for the year ended
activitiesDecember 31, 2025 was $419,310 compared to $404,190 for the year ended December 31, 2024,2024. wasThe $404,190cash comparedused toin $794,291investing activities for the
year ended December 31, 2023.2025 was due to $187,317 for purchase of property and equipment and $231,993 in patent costs incurred. The cash
used used
in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2024,2024 was due to $214,765 for purchase of property and equipment and $189,425
in patent costs incurred. The cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2023, was due to $575,663 for purchase
of property and equipment, $21,352 payments for right of use asset and $197,276 in patent and trademark costs incurred.
Cash provided
by financing activities for the year
ended December 31, 2025 was $3,429,286 as compared to $11,941,258 for the year ended December 31, 2024, was $11,941,258 as compared to $3,632,468 for the year ended December 31,
2023.2024. This change was due to $12,546,949
$3,803,498 in proceeds from the sale of commonCommon stockStock, andnet warrants
of issuance costs, offset by $450,691$374,212 in payments pursuant to a
finance agreement, and $155,000 in payments of placement agent feesagreement during the year ended
December 31, 2024.2025. Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2023 2024
was due to $4,500,000 in proceeds from
convertible notes payable, net of original issue discount of $500,000, $390,000$12,391,949 in proceeds from exercisethe sale of Common Stock and warrants, net of issuance costs, offset by $942,532
in payments of finance agreement and $315,000$450,691 in payments of placement agent fees duringpursuant
to the yearSales endedAgreement Decemberfor 31,the 2023.ATM Offering.
Boustead Securities responded to
the termination
of the Placement Agent Agreement by disputing Legacy Cardio’s contention that it had not performed under the Placement
Agent Agreement
because, among other things, Boustead Securities had never sought out prospective investors. In its response, Boustead
Securities included
a list of funds that they had supposedly contacted on Legacy Cardio’s behalf. While Boustead Securities’
contention appears
to contradict earlier communications from Boustead Securities in which they indicated that they had not made any such
contacts or introductions,
Boustead Securities is currently contendingcontended that they are due success fees for two years following the termination
of the Placement Agent Agreement
on any transaction with any person on the list of supposed contacts or introductions. Legacy Cardio strongly
disputes this position. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, the Company has not consummated any transaction, as defined, with any potential
party that purportedly was a contact of
Boustead Securities in connection with the Placement Agent Agreement and has no plans to do so
at any time during the tail period. No
legal proceedings have been instigated by either party, and Cardio believes that the final outcome
will not have a material adverse impact on its financial condition.party.
As noted in Note
1, theThe Company completed a business combination with
Mana on October 25, 2022. In connection with the proposed business combination, by
agreement dated May 13, 2022, Mana engaged The Benchmark
Company, LLC (“Benchmark”) as its M&A advisor. Upon closing of
the business combination, Legacy Cardio assumed the contractual
engagement entered into by Mana. On November 14, 2022, Cardio and Benchmark
entered into Amendment No. 1 Engagement Letter (the “Amendment
Engagement”). Pursuant to the Amendment Engagement, Benchmark
has been granted a right of first refusal to act as lead or joint-lead
investment banker, lead or joint-lead book-runner and/or lead or
joint-lead placement agent for all future public and private equity and
debt offerings through October 25, 2023. Based on the right of
first refusal, Benchmark alleges that it is owed damages because the Company
entered into the Yorkville Convertible Debenture Transaction
(see Note 11 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements) without first offering Benchmark the right to serve as the lead or joint-lead
placement agent for the transaction. The Company is evaluating the claim. No legal proceedings have been instigated.
On June 25, 2022,
a plaintiffs’
securities law firm sent a demand letter to the Company alleging that the Company’s Registration Statement
on Form S-4 filed (the
“S-4 Registration Statement”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on May
31, 2022 omitted material
information with respect to the Business Combination and demanding that the Company and its Board of Directors
immediately provide corrective
disclosures in an amendment or supplement to the Registration Statement. Subsequent thereto, the Company
filed amendments to the S-S-4 4
Registration Statement on July 27, 2022, August 23, 2022, September 15, 2022, October 4, 2022 and October
5, 2022 in which it responded
to various comments of the SEC staff and otherwise updated its disclosure. In October 2022, the SEC completed
its review and declared
the S-4 registration statement effective on October 6, 2022. On February 23, 2023 and February 27, 2023, plaintiffs’
securities securities
law firm contacted the Company’s counsel asking who will be negotiating a mootness fee relating to the purported claims
set forth
in the June 25, 2022 demand letter. The Company vigorously denies that the S-4 Registration Statement, as amended and declared
effective, effective,
is deficient in any respect and believes that no additional supplemental disclosures are material or required. The Company
believes that
the claims asserted in the Demand Letter are without merit and that no further disclosure is required to supplement the
S-4 Registration
Statement under applicable laws. As of the date of filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, no lawsuit has been filed
against the Company
by that firm. The firm has indicated its willingness to litigate the matter if a mutually satisfactory resolution cannot be agreed upon;
however, Cardio believes that the final outcome will not have a material adverse impact on its financial condition.
In January 2024, following the
Company’s termination
of its agreement with Yorkville and in connection with the Company’s recent at the market offering and/or
its February 2024 private
placement, a managing director of Northland Securities, Inc. (“Northland”) contacted the Company
claiming the right to be
paid a fee of approximately $150,000 pursuant to the agreement of March 1, 2023 between the Company and Northland
regarding the Yorkville
financing. Subsequently, the Company has been advised by another representative of Northland that Northland would
not proceed with any
such claim. The Company does not believe that it owes Northland any sum based on the termination of the Yorkville
Securities Purchase Agreementclaim and theno subsequentlegal financingproceedings transactions.have been instigated.
The University of Iowa Research Foundation Exclusive License Agreement
The Company has a worldwide exclusive license agreement with the University of Iowa Research Foundation (UIRF) relating to its patent and patent-pending technology (the “Exclusive License Agreement”). Under the terms of the Exclusive License Agreement, the Company will have to pay each of: (1) 1% of either the: (i) aggregate consideration (and trailing consideration, if any) for a liquidation event; or (ii) pre-money valuation for an initial public offering, (the “Equity Rights”) (2) 2% of annual net sales, and (3) 15% of non-royalty fees paid to licensee if it enters into one or more sublicensing agreements. Upon the Closing of the Business Combination, the Company issued 3,639 (109,170 prior to the Reverse Stock Split) Shares of Common Stock to UIRF in accordance with the Equity Rights under the Exclusive License Agreement. The Company has had minimal sales of $68,631 to date and has paid 2% or approximately $1,300 in total royalty fees to UIRF under the exclusive license.
Nasdaq Continued Listing Compliance
On June 3, 2024, we received notice from The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) that we were not in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) because the closing bid price of our common stock had been below $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive business days. We were provided an initial compliance period and, on December 4, 2024, were granted an additional compliance period through June 2, 2025.
In May 2025, we effected a reverse stock split, after which we regained compliance with the minimum bid price requirement. Nasdaq subsequently notified us that we had regained compliance with Listing Rule 5550(a)(2).
Although we are currently in compliance, the market price of our common stock has historically experienced volatility and may continue to fluctuate due to factors both within and outside of our control, including our operating performance, capital market conditions, investor sentiment toward small-cap healthcare companies, and broader macroeconomic trends. Reverse stock splits do not guarantee sustained increases in market price, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement or other Nasdaq continued listing standards in the future.
If the bid price of our common stock were to decline below $1.00 per share for a sustained period, we could again become non-compliant with Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements. In addition, continued listing on Nasdaq requires compliance with other quantitative and qualitative standards, including stockholders’ equity thresholds, market value of publicly held shares, corporate governance requirements, and timely filing obligations.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
New heading “There can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the continued listing standards of Nasdaq.”
Largest changes
“The price of our Common Stock has been on a downward trend for at least the last six months. On August 6, 2026, our Common Stock closed at $1.66, and with a total of 2,959,469 shares outstanding, the MVLS on that date was $4,912,719. As such, if the new MVLS listing standard were currently in effect, our securities could be in danger of failing to meet the continued listing standard of $5 million in MVLS at some point in the foreseeable future. Were that to occur, our stock would immediately be delisted from Nasdaq and would begin trading on the OTC market. …”see in full comparison
“Our Common Stock is listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”). In order to maintain that listing, we must satisfy minimum financial and other requirements. On July 22, 2026, the SEC adopted a final rule implementing a proposed revision to Nasdaq’s requirements for continued listing on Nasdaq. The rule would require Nasdaq-listed companies to maintain at least $5 million in market value of listed securities (“MVLS”), with an immediate suspension and delisting framework if the requirement is not met for 30 consecutive business days. …”see in full comparison
“There can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the continued listing standards of Nasdaq.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (4)
There
have been
no material changes to the risk factors previously described in Item 1A of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year
ended December 31, 2025.2025 except as set forth below. These risk factors, collectively, describe some
of the assumptions, risks, uncertainties and other factors that could adversely affect our business or that could otherwise result in
changes that differ materially from our expectations. We may disclose changes to such risk factors or disclose additional risk factors
from time to time in our future filings with the SEC, including as set forth below. Additional risks and uncertainties not
currently currently
known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition
or future
results.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the continued listing standards of Nasdaq.
Our Common Stock is listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”). In order to maintain that listing, we must satisfy minimum financial and other requirements. On July 22, 2026, the SEC adopted a final rule implementing a proposed revision to Nasdaq’s requirements for continued listing on Nasdaq. The rule would require Nasdaq-listed companies to maintain at least $5 million in market value of listed securities (“MVLS”), with an immediate suspension and delisting framework if the requirement is not met for 30 consecutive business days. On July 29, 2026, the SEC temporarily stayed the July 22 order after receiving multiple notices of intention to petition review of the delegated action from parties that would likely be impacted by the new rule. The stay will remain in effect until further order of the SEC. However, at such time as this MVLS rule goes into effect, if it does, the new listing standard could have serious implications for our status as a Nasdaq-listed company. If finally adopted, then if our MVLS fails to meet the $5 million threshold for 30 consecutive business days, our securities will be subject to immediate suspension and delisting from Nasdaq, without any cure or compliance period as is typically granted to issuers that fail to maintain compliance with other continued listing standards. In its current form, the July 22, 2026 rule provides that a Nasdaq Hearings Panel may reverse a delisting decision where it determines the delisting determination was in error, or grant an exception for a period not to exceed 180 days from the delisting determination for the company to demonstrate that it meets all requirements for initial listing. Those initial listing standards are, for the most part, more rigorous than the standards to maintain continued listing on Nasdaq. It seems likely that some version of the July 22, 2026 rule will be adopted.
The price of our Common Stock has been on a downward trend for at least the last six months. On August 6, 2026, our Common Stock closed at $1.66, and with a total of 2,959,469 shares outstanding, the MVLS on that date was $4,912,719. As such, if the new MVLS listing standard were currently in effect, our securities could be in danger of failing to meet the continued listing standard of $5 million in MVLS at some point in the foreseeable future. Were that to occur, our stock would immediately be delisted from Nasdaq and would begin trading on the OTC market. It is unlikely that we could meet the initial listing requirements to regain access to Nasdaq within the 180 day period provided in the new rule, as originally adopted on July 22, 2026. Accordingly, if our securities are delisted from Nasdaq, either for failing to meet the new MVLS standard, if finally adopted, or if we fail to meet any other listing standard required for continued listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market, investors should expect that the OTC market will be the trading market for our securities for the foreseeable future. Trading in the OTC market involves significant risks, including, among others, low liquidity, wide bid-ask spreads and a lack of reliable financial transparency. In the event our securities are delisted from Nasdaq and move to the OTC market, investors should expect volatile stock prices and the possibility that they may find it difficult to sell their shares for the price they would like to receive, if at all.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Change in Nasdaq Continued Listing Standards”
New heading “Comparisons for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025:”
Removed heading “Recent Regulatory and Judicial Developments Regarding LDTs”
Largest changes
“On May 6, 2024, FDA published a final rule amending the definition of an in vitro diagnostic (“IVD”) device to include tests manufactured by a clinical laboratory. Pursuant to the rule, laboratory developed tests (“LDTs”), i.e., tests designed, manufactured, and used within a single CLIA-certified high complexity laboratory, are medical devices subject to FDA regulation under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The final rule also announced FDA’s intention to apply its medical device requirements to LDTs. …”see in full comparison
We have had, and expect that we will continue to have, an ongoing need to raise additional cash from outside sources to fund our operations and grow our business, given the nominal amount of revenue we have generated since inception, coupled with substantial expenses both for ongoing business operations and to fund expenses incurred as a public company. We expect that our primary cash needs for the remainder of 2026 and for the foreseeable future will be for funding day-to-day operations and working capital requirements, funding our growthsee in full comparisonstrategy, paying the setup expenses of our internal laboratorystrategy and paying expenses incurred in connection with our ongoing FDA submission activities. We explore our financing options on an ongoing basis. However, given recent stock prices and the extreme volatility of our stock, it continues to be challenging to balance cash that could be raised and the dilution that might be required to close a particular transaction. We expect that for the remainder of 2026, we will rely primarily on the ongoing ATM Offering, provided that market conditions are favorable. If our securities arefavorable.delisted from Nasdaq, raising capital through the sale of securities, by way of the ATM Offering or otherwise, will become much more challenging going forward.
“Cardio launched its first clinical test, Epi+Gen CHD™, a three-year symptomatic CHD risk assessment clinical blood test targeting CHD events, including heart attacks, in 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, the initial strategy for commercialization involved launching the test via telemedicine and in smaller provider practices such as concierge medicine practices. …”see in full comparison
“On July 22, 2026, the SEC adopted a final rule implementing a proposed revision to Nasdaq’s requirements for continued listing on Nasdaq. The rule, implemented through Nasdaq Rules 5450(a)(3) and 5550(a)(6), would require Nasdaq-listed companies to maintain at least $5 million in market value of listed securities (“MVLS”), with an immediate suspension and delisting framework if the requirement is not met for 30 consecutive business days. Unlike most Nasdaq listing standards, the rule provides for no cure period and very limited appeal rights. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (48)
The following discussion and analysis provide information that Cardio’s
management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of Cardio’s results of operations and financial condition. You
should read the following discussion and analysis of Cardio’s results of operations and financial condition together with its unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes to those statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q, and its audited consolidated financial statements and related notes to those statements included in the Company’s 2025 Annual
Report on Form 10-K that was filed on March 13, 2026 (the “2025 Form 10-K”). In addition to historical financial information,
this discussion contains forward-looking statements based upon Cardio’s current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties,
including those described in the section titled, “Special Note About Forward-Looking Statements,” above. Cardio’s actual
results could differ materially from such forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under “Risk
Factors” in the 2025 Form 10-K (Item 1A therein)., as well as in Item 1A of Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Our historical
results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may
be expected for any period in the future.
Cardio believes that it is the first company to develop and commercialize
epigenetics-based clinical tests for cardiovascular disease that have clear value propositions for multiple stakeholders including (1)
patients, (2) clinicians, (3) hospitals/health systems, (4) employersemployers, and (5) payors. According to the CDC, epigenetics is the study
of of
how a person’s behaviors and environment can cause changes that affect the way a person’s genes work. Unlike genetic changes,
epigenetic changes are reversible and do not change one’s DNA sequence, but they can change how a person’s body reads a DNA
sequence.
By leveraging our AI-driven Multi-Omics Engine, Cardio developed and launched two physician-prescribed blood tests, which included conducting rigorous studies and validation. The first test, Epi+Gen CHD™, can predict a patient’s risk for having a CHD event, including a heart attack. The second test, PrecisionCHD™, can detect molecular signals associated with the presence of coronary heart disease. The PrecisionCHD™ test is coupled to Actionable Clinical Intelligence (“ACI”), a platform that offers epigenetic insights to clinicians prescribing the test to help personalize patient management. We believe that our Epi+Gen CHD™ and PrecisionCHD™ tests are categorized as laboratory-developed tests, or “LDTs.” Cardio is actively pursuing payer coverage and reimbursement for these tests, which would be necessary to significantly increase testing volume and revenue growth. Currently, we have secured reimbursement codes from the American Medical Association for both tests, 0439U for Epi+Gen CHD and 0440U for PrecisionCHD. We have also secured gapfill payment rates for both tests from the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) of $854 per test for both tests. The Company is continuing its efforts related to payer coverage and reimbursement, including pursuing Medicare coverage and in the quarter ended June 30, 2026, the Company established the ability to submit out-of-network claims to commercial payers, secured its first coverage by Atlas Healthcare Physicians (AHP), a community-driven, independent physician association (IPA) based in Southern California. AHP started covering Cardio’s tests, Epi+Gen CHD™ and PrecisionCHD™, for their members with prior authorization in May 2026. AHP consists of an expansive network of primary care and specialists, hospitals, and ancillary providers serving managed care populations across Los Angeles and Orange County.
In parallel, Cardio’s go-to-market strategy is targeted towards segments and stakeholders that do not rely heavily on payer reimbursement. The majority of our current efforts include offering the tests via: 1) telemedicine for patients willing to pay for testing out-of-pocket, 2) smaller and more innovative provider practices such as functional medicine and concierge medicine practices, 3) employer organizations and unions that are interested in reducing costs and risks related to cardiovascular disease, and improving the health of their employee population, and 4) engaging benefit brokers and consultants to help identify employers invested in or looking to invest in cardiovascular disease prevention and early detection. Despite long partnership and sales cycles, in some instance as long as 24 months, Cardio has been able to increase the number of provider and other organizations offering its tests and has continued the development of a more robust sales and partnership pipeline. In the quarter ended June 30, 2026, Cardio increased the number of provider organizations offering our tests to their patients, increased engagement and re-engagement efforts of providers, and continued to showcase our products to employers, unions, and benefit brokers at leading conferences.
In addition to our blood tests, we launched HeartRisk™, a cardiovascular disease risk intelligence platform. This platform provides population level, de-identified, aggregated and compliant data to stakeholders such as employers and benefit brokers, to help inform their benefit design strategies to mitigate costs and risks associated with cardiovascular disease. We also have a research-use-only (“RUO”) solution, CardioInnovate360™, that leverages our AI-driven Multi-Omics Engine to support the discovery, development and validation of novel biopharmaceuticals for the assessment and management of cardiovascular diseases.
To further diversify our go-to-market strategy, the Company continues to explore new market opportunities in the US and internationally. The first such market outside of the US is India via an agreement entered into with Aimil Ltd. and Dr. LalPathLabs, that was announced in early 2026. In the quarter ended June 30, 2026, the Company made progress in its implementation in India with initial shipment of Company proprietary reagents to Aimil Ltd and Dr. Lal Path Labs. The Company is also engaged in discussions related to other potential international expansions.
Finally, the Company completed the setup of its new high complexity CLIA lab with the initial CLIA survey conducted by a CLIA compliance manager and found no deficiencies. In addition to the federal certification requirements, the laboratory also received its out-of-state licenses from California, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island. Testing of patient samples has commenced at this facility for samples originating from all states except New York, pending the acquisition of a New York license. As a result of the lab setup, the Company is no longer reliant on a third-party lab for patient sample processing, and the lab setup provides an opportunity to reduce cost of goods sold with scale. In the quarter ended June 30, 2026, the Company made progress in its New York license application.
Cardio launched its first clinical test, Epi+Gen CHD™, a three-year
symptomatic CHD risk assessment clinical blood test targeting CHD events, including heart attacks, in 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a result, the initial strategy for commercialization involved launching the test via telemedicine and in smaller provider practices
such as concierge medicine practices. The volume of tests through these channels were minimal, and as the circumstances around COVID-19
pandemic improved, management re-vamped the Company’s go-to-market strategy to include other healthcare verticals and stakeholders
beyond patients and small providers, including larger provider organizations, group purchasing organizations, employers, payors and life
insurers. This new approach allowed Cardio to expand the reach of our solutions beyond the initial focus areas. Beyond the launch of Epi+Gen
CHD, in March 2023, we announced the launch of our second product, PrecisionCHD™, an integrated epigenetic-genetic clinical blood
test for the detection of coronary heart disease. The PrecisionCHD™ tests is coupled to Actionable Clinical Intelligence (“ACI”),
a platform that offers new epigenetic and genetic insights to clinicians prescribing the to personalize patient management and help improve
chronic care management. In May 2023, we launched CardioInnovate360™, a research-use-only (“RUO”) solution to support
the discovery, development and validation of novel biopharmaceuticals for the assessment and management of cardiovascular diseases. In
February 2024, we announced the launch of HeartRisk™, a cardiovascular disease risk intelligence platform. We believe that our Epi+Gen
CHD™ and PrecisionCHD™ tests are categorized as laboratory-developed tests, or “LDTs.” The new go-to-market strategy
is also being implemented for these products. Despite long partnership and sales cycles, in some instance as long as 24 months, Cardio
has been able to increase the number of provider and other organizations offering its tests and has continued the development of a more
robust sales and partnership pipeline. In the quarter ended March 31, 2026, the focus of the Company remained in driving adoption of our
clinical solutions, predominantly among providers, channel partners, and employers. The Company also completed the scheduled Heart Health
Fairs at YMCA of East Tennessee and Southdale YMCA. In addition, the Company has made progress in its implementation in India in partnership
with Aimil Ltd and Dr. Lal Path Labs, and in discussions related to other potential international expansions. Finally, the setup of the
Company’s new high complexity CLIA lab was completed with the initial CLIA survey conducted by a CLIA compliance manager and found
no deficiencies. In addition to the federal certification requirements, the laboratory also received its out-of-state licenses from California,
Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island. Testing of patient samples have commenced at this facility for samples originating from all
states except New York until a New York license is obtained. As a result of the lab setup, the Company is no longer reliant on a third-party
lab for patient sample processing and the lab setup provides an opportunity to reduce cost of goods sold with scale.
Change in Nasdaq Continued Listing Standards
On July 22, 2026, the SEC adopted a final rule implementing a proposed revision to Nasdaq’s requirements for continued listing on Nasdaq. The rule, implemented through Nasdaq Rules 5450(a)(3) and 5550(a)(6), would require Nasdaq-listed companies to maintain at least $5 million in market value of listed securities (“MVLS”), with an immediate suspension and delisting framework if the requirement is not met for 30 consecutive business days. Unlike most Nasdaq listing standards, the rule provides for no cure period and very limited appeal rights. On July 29, 2026, the SEC temporarily stayed the July 22 order after receiving multiple notices of intention to petition review of the delegated action from parties that would likely be impacted by the new rule. The stay will remain in effect until further order of the SEC. The Company is closely monitoring its MVLS and preparing for next steps, should they become necessary. If our securities are delisted from Nasdaq for failure to meeting the continuing MVLS listing standard, our securities will trade on the OTC market and we anticipate that raising needed capital will become more difficult.
As of MayAugust 15,7, 2026, we have sold an aggregate 2,251,181 shares of
our our
Common Stock under the Sales Agreement and may sell up to another $5,298,889 of our Common Stock through Craig-Hallum under the Sales
Agreement.
Recent Regulatory and Judicial Developments
Regarding LDTs
On May 6, 2024, FDA published a final rule amending the definition
of an in vitro diagnostic (“IVD”) device to include tests manufactured by a clinical laboratory. Pursuant to the rule, laboratory
developed tests (“LDTs”), i.e., tests designed, manufactured, and used within a single CLIA-certified high complexity laboratory,
are medical devices subject to FDA regulation under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The final rule also announced FDA’s
intention to apply its medical device requirements to LDTs. Under the final rule, all LDTs, unless subject to a specific exemption, would
be subject to premarket authorization requirements (510(k), de novo classification, or PMA) for each LDT performed by the laboratory,
and to postmarket registration and listing, medical device reporting, correction, removal, and recall, complaint handling, labeling, investigational
device, and quality system requirements. FDA intends to phase in these requirements beginning May 6, 2025. The final rule stated that
certain categories of LDTs would be subject to enforcement discretion with respect to some or all of these requirements. For example,
FDA would apply enforcement discretion to currently marketed LDTs that were first offered prior to May 6, 2024, with respect to most quality
system requirements and the requirement for premarket authorization if they are not modified or modified in only limited ways. Laboratories
performing these tests are subject to other requirements, including the requirement to submit the labeling for the LDT to FDA for review.
FDA would similarly exercise enforcement discretion with respect to premarket authorization for LDTs approved by the New York State Clinical
Laboratory Evaluation Program (“NYS-CLEP”).
On September 19, 2025, the FDA formally rescinded its May 2024 final
rule regulating Laboratory Developed Tests (LDTs) as medical devices, following a March 31, 2025, federal court ruling. The U.S.
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas found the FDA exceeded its authority, reverting LDT oversight to Clinical Laboratory
Improvement Amendments (CLIA). There has been no further pursuit by the current administration.
Comparisons for the three months ended MarchJune
31,30, 2026 and 2025:
Comparisons for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025:
The following table presents summary of consolidated operating results for the six-month periods indicated:
Cardio’s net loss
for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $1,788,158$1,501,468 as compared to $1,635,064$1,683,199 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, ana increasedecrease
of $153,094.$181,731. The increasedecrease in net loss was primarily the result of ana increasedecrease in R&D, Selling, General and Administrative expenses
in mostly related to
annual franchise taxes.2026.
Cardio’s net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was $3,289,626 as compared to $3,318,263 for the six months ended June 30, 2025, a decrease of $28,637. The decrease in net loss was primarily the result of a decrease in amortization expense.
Cardio had $2,680$5,360 and $940$7,475
in in
revenue for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The increasedecrease in revenue iswas noted in Q1 as a result of new providers onboardingthe
and additional usageconclusion of ourthe testsFamily byMedicine currentSpecialists’ providerHeart andAttack employerPrevention clients.testing initiative. Additional providers have been and organizations are
continuing to be
onboarded. However,onboarded thereas isnoted aby oneQ2 to three quarter period from onboarding to ramping up usage of tests.revenue.
Cardio had $8,040 and $8,415 in revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Expenses related to sales and marketing
for the three
months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, were $196,712$190,183 as compared to $188,977$202,850 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, ana increase
decrease of $7,735.$12,667. The
overall increasedecrease was due to ana increasedecrease in sales and marketing personnel and efforts in the firstsecond quarter of 2026. We
expect our sales and marketing costs to increase with the ongoing implementation in India.
Expenses related to sales and marketing for the six months ended June 30, 2026, were $386,895 as compared to $391,827 for the six months ended June 30, 2025, a decrease of $4,932. The overall decrease was due to a decrease in sales and marketing efforts in the second quarter of 2026. We expect our sales and marketing costs to increase with the ongoing implementation in India.
Research and
development expense
for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was $129,776 as compared to $118,784 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $162,929 as compared to $178,536 for the three months ended June 30,
2025, ana increase
decrease of $10,992. The overall increase was$15,607 due to ana increasedecrease in researchlab and development personnel in 2026. We expect our research and
development costs to increase with ongoing and planned studies to generate additional clinical and economic evidence, and to support reimbursement
conversations with payers.processing.
Research and development expense for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was $292,705 as compared to $297,320 for the six months ended June 30, 2025, a slight decrease of $4,615. The overall decrease was due to a decrease in lab processing offset by the increase in research and development personnel in the second quarter of 2026. We expect our research and development costs to increase with ongoing and planned studies to generate additional clinical and economic evidence, and to support reimbursement conversations with payers.
General and administrative expenses for the three
months ended MarchJune 31,
30, 2026, were $1,455,497$1,144,802 as compared to $1,278,301$1,296,303 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, ana increasedecrease of $177,196. $151,501.
The overall increase
decrease is primarily due to ana increasedecrease in softwarelegal and web computing fees, investor relationsprofessional expense, annual franchise taxes expensesconsulting and corporatecontracting expense, and insurance
overhead expenses in 2026.
General and Administrativeadministrative expense for the three months
ended March
31,June 30, 2026 included payroll and related costs of $353,955,$354,712, rent and other facility costs of $85,557,$93,727, legal and professional fees
of $229,255,
$114,551, consulting and contractor fees of $144,835,$111,534, insurance expense of $146,354,$141,614, filing fees of $17,250,$15,425, transfer agent fees of $10,110,
$6,115, software
and web computing expenses of $90,025,$145,584, board compensation of $49,733,$49,351, investor relations expense of $38,092, franchise tax of $178,467
and general corporate overhead expenses of $111,864.$112,189.
General and Administrativeadministrative expense for the three months
ended March
31,June 30, 2025 included payroll and related costs of $345,497 (including stock compensation expenses of $30,612),$345,031, rent and other facility costs
of $66,393,$89,461, legal and professional fees
of $301,520,$209,744, consulting and contractor fees of $160,802,$165,905, insurance expense of $156,567,$158,263, filing
fees of $20,131,$22,159, transfer agent fees of $6,382,
$5,554, software and web computing expenses of $78,591,$101,723, board compensation of $49,612,$49,778, investor
relations expense of $3,750, franchise tax of $225 and general
corporate overhead expenses of $88,831.$144,935.
General and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2026, were $2,600,299 as compared to $2,574,604 for the six months ended June 30, 2025, an increase of $25,695. The overall increase is primarily due to an increase in rent and facility expenses, software and web computing fees, investor relations expense, and annual franchise taxes expenses, offset by a decrease in legal and professional expense, consulting and contracting expense, and insurance expenses in 2026.
General and administrative expense for the six months ended June 30, 2026 included payroll and related costs of $708,667, rent and other facility costs of $179,284, legal and professional fees of $343,806, consulting and contractor fees of $256,369, insurance expense of $287,968, filing fees of $32,675, transfer agent fees of $16,225, software and web computing expenses of $235,609, board compensation of $99,084, investor relations expense of 38,092, franchise tax expense of $178,467 and general corporate overhead expenses of $224,053.
General and administrative expense for the six months ended June 30, 2025 included payroll and related costs of $690,528, rent and other facility costs of $155,854, legal and professional fees of $511,264, consulting and contractor fees of $326,707, insurance expense of $314,830, filing fees of $42,290, transfer agent fees of $11,936, software and web computing expenses of $180,314, board compensation of $99,390, investor relations expense of $7,500, franchise tax of $225, and general corporate overhead expenses of $233,766.
We expect our general corporate overhead to remain
relatively flat. However, we expect an increase in payroll and related costs and other facility costs, including furnishing the laboratory
However,facility, capital expenditure of laboratory equipment, and other laboratory materials, and costs associated with securing a new office
lease. Additionally, as a public company, we expect to have to comply with changing legal and exchange requirements, including as to regulations
of of
the SEC and the continued listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market. We incur additional annual expenses related to these matters
and, among other things, additional directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, directors’ fees, reporting requirements
of the SEC, transfer agent fees, increased auditing and legal fees and similar expenses.
Patents are amortized over their estimated useful
lives of approximately
14 and 15 years, respectively. Amortization expense related to patents charged to operations was $5,532$5,593 and $41,438 $7,152
for the three months
ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively and $11,125 and $48,590 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025,
respectively. The amortization for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 also included $4,000$1,333 and $5,333 respectively amortization
for intangible assets, which has been fully amortized during 2025.
Total other expense for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, was
$(3,321)
as compared to $(4,5044,500) for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The total other expensesexpense for the three months ended March
31,June 30, 2026, consists
of interest expense of $3,439,$3,440, net of interest income of $118.$119. The total other expensesexpense for the three months ended
March 31,June 30, 2025, consists
of interest expense of $4,691,$4,690, net of interest income of $187.$190.
Total other expense for the six months ended June 30, 2026, was $(6,642) as compared to $(9,004) for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The total other expense for the six months ended June 30, 2026, consists of interest expense of $6,879, net of interest income of $237. The total other expense for the six months ended June 30, 2025, consists of interest expense of $9,381, net of interest income of $377.
On January 26, 2024, we entered into the Sales Agreement with Craig-Hallum.
Pursuant to the Sales Agreement, we may sell, at our option, shares of our Common Stock through Craig-Hallum, as sales agent. Sales of
our Common Stock were made pursuant to the Sales Agreement initially up to an aggregate of $17 million under thea Initialshelf Registrationregistration statement
Statementdeclared effective in February 2024 (File No. 333-276725) and will continue to be made pursuant to the Sales Agreement up to an aggregate
of $9,476,508 under thea Additionalsecond Registrationshelf Statement.registration statement declared effective in February 2025 (File No. 333-284775).
As of MayAugust 15,7, 2026, we sold an aggregate 2,251,181 shares of our
Common Common
Stock on a Reverse Stock Split-adjusted basis under the Sales Agreement resulting in proceeds to the Company of $18,754,735, net
of offering
costs. The Company has paid Craig-Hallum $480,890 in sales commissions.
On February 2, 2024 (pre-dating the 1-for-30 reverse stock split effected
in May 2025), in accordance with executed subscription agreements with seven accredited investors (the “Subscription Agreements”),
we closed on the sale of 561,793 units (the “Units”), with each Unit consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common
stock, $0.00001 par value (the “Common Stock”) and (ii) one six year Common Stock purchase warrant (the “Warrants”),
which warrants are exercisable until February 2, 2030 at an exercise price of $1.78 ($53.40 on a post-reverse stock split basis) per share,
subject to adjustment for stock splits, reverse stock splits and other similar events of recapitalization, including the 1-for-30 reverse
stock split we effected on May 12, 2025. The Units were sold to the investors in a private placement at a sale price of $1.78 ($53.40
on a post-reverse stock split basis) per Unit (the “Private Placement”), resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of $1,000,000,
before deducting placement agent fees (10% or $100,000) and other offering expenses. We used the net proceeds from the Private Placement
for working capital and general corporate purposes. On a post-reverse stock split basis, the Company issued 18,727 shares and warrants
that are exercisable for 18,727 shares, all at an exercise price of $53.40 per share. We have subsequently registered the Private Placement
Common Stock and the Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of the Private Placement Warrants on a registration statement on Form S-1
that was declared effective by the SEC on December 3, 2024 and subsequently on September 19, 2025.2025 by way of a post-effective amendment.
We have had, and expect that we will continue to have, an ongoing need
to raise additional cash from outside sources to fund our operations and grow our business, given the nominal amount of revenue we have
generated since inception, coupled with substantial expenses both for ongoing business operations and to fund expenses incurred as a public
company. We expect that our primary cash needs for the remainder of 2026 and for the foreseeable future will be for funding day-to-day
operations and working capital requirements, funding our growth strategy, paying the setup expenses of our internal laboratorystrategy and paying
expenses incurred in connection with our ongoing FDA
submission activities. We explore our financing options on an ongoing basis.
However, given recent stock prices and the extreme volatility
of our stock, it continues to be challenging to balance cash that could
be raised and the dilution that might be required to close a particular
transaction. We expect that for the remainder of 2026, we will
rely primarily on the ongoing ATM Offering, provided that market conditions
are favorable. If our securities are favorable.delisted from Nasdaq, raising capital through the sale of securities, by way of the ATM Offering
or otherwise, will become much more challenging going forward.
The exercise prices of our currently outstanding warrants range from
a high of $345 to a low of $53.40 (a high of $11.50 to a low of $1.78 before the Reverse Stock Split) (subject to adjustment) per share
of Common Stock. The likelihood that warrant holders will exercise their warrants, and therefore the amount of cash proceeds that we
might receive, is dependent upon the trading price of our Common Stock, the last reported sales price for which was $1.68$1.66 on MayAugust 14,6,
2026. 2026.
If the trading price of our Common Stock is less than the respective exercise prices of our outstanding warrants, which has been
the the
case for a substantial period of time, we believe holders of any of our warrants will be unlikely to exercise their warrants. ThereIt
is is
no guaranteeunlikely that the warrants will be in the money prior to their respective expiration dates, and as such, the warrants may expire worthless,
worthless, and we may receive no proceeds from the exercise of warrants. Given the current differential between the trading price of
our Common
Stock and the Warrant exercise prices and the volatility of our stock price, we are not making strategic business decisions
based on
an expectation that we will receive any cash from the exercise of warrants. However, we will use any cash proceeds received
from the
exercise of warrants for general corporate and working capital purposes, which would increase our liquidity. We will continue
to evaluate
the probability of warrant exercises and the merit of including potential cash proceeds from the exercise of the warrants
in our future
liquidity projections.
Cash at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 totaled $7,077,021$5,586,697 as compared to $5,110,630
at December 31, 2025, an increase of $1,966,391.$476,067. The following table shows Cardio’s cash flows
from operating activities, investing activities and financing activities for the stated periods.
Cash used in operating activities for the threesix months ended MarchJune 30,
31, 2026 was $1,562,212$2,904,576 as compared to $1,400,101$2,971,566 for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The cash used in operations during the threesix months
months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 is a function of net loss of $1,788,158$3,289,626 adjusted for the following non-cash operating items: depreciation
of $44,240, $88,523,
amortization of $50,412,$101,570, $24,733$49,085 in stock-based compensation, a decrease of $3,852$4,221 in accounts receivable, a decrease of $138,627$232,590 in
in prepaid expenses and other current assets, an increase of $25,528$32,640 in accounts payable and accrued expenses and a decrease in lease liability
liability of $61,446.$123,579.
The cash used in operations during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025
2025 is a function of net loss of $1,635,064$3,318,263 adjusted for the following non-cash operating items: depreciation of $37,656,$75,441, amortization of
of$139,022, $87,664, $30,612$61,390 in stock-based compensation, a decrease of $9,060$5,685 in accounts receivable, a decrease of $107,461$220,762 in prepaid expenses
and other current assets, ana increasedecrease of $20,520$38,937 in accounts payable and accrued expenses and a decrease in lease liability of $58,010.$116,666.
Cash used in investing activities for the threesix months ended MarchJune 30,
31, 2026 was $63,696$110,485 compared to $47,415$83,132 for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The cash used in investing activities for the threesix months
months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and March 31, 2025 was due to purchases of property and equipment and patent costs incurred.
Cash provided by financing activities for the threesix months ended MarchJune 30,
31, 2026 was $3,592,299$3,491,128 as compared to $3,308,748$3,193,711 for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. Cash provided by financing activities for
the three six
months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was due to $3,693,470 in net proceeds from the sale of common stock offset by $101,171$202,342 in payments
of finance
agreement. Cash provided by financing activities for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 was due to $3,423,784 in net proceeds
from the
sale of common stock offset by $115,036$230,073 in payments of finance agreementagreement.
We did not have any off-balance sheet
arrangements as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we do not have any ongoing contractual obligations
that would have a negative impact on liquidity and cash flows. However, if one or more of the following potential claims that arise from
contracts we have entered into were pursued against us, there is the potential that we could see a negative impact on liquidity and cash
flows, depending on the outcome.
Our senior management has reviewed the critical
accounting policies and
estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. For a description of the Company’s critical
accounting policies and
estimates, refer to “Part II—Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of
Operations—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in our most recent Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December
31, 2025, which was filed with the SEC on March 13, 2026. Critical accounting policies are those that
are most important to the portrayal
of our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows and require management’s most
difficult, subjective and complex
judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently
uncertain. If actual results
were to differ significantly from estimates made, the reported results could be materially affected. There
were no significant changes
to our critical accounting policies and estimates during the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
CDIO insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
No Form 4 stock transactions in this period.
Well-known investors holding CDIO (13F)
None of the 59 investors we track reported a position in their latest 13F.