Companies › CG

CG 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

Carlyle Group Inc. (also CGABL) · Nasdaq · Investment Advice · CIK 1527166 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from Carlyle Group Inc.'s public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

79 / 148risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
2new risk-factor headings
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
1Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-02-27 (period ending 2025-12-31) with 10-K filed 2025-02-27 (period ending 2024-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

79new paragraphs
148removed paragraphs
172reworded paragraphs
57,320 → 50,640words in section

New heading “Rapidly developing and changing global data security and privacy laws and regulations could increase compliance costs and subject us to enforcement risks and reputational damage.”

New heading “Our funds may be forced to dispose of investments at a disadvantageous time.”

Removed heading “Laws and regulations relating to privacy, data protection, data transfers, data localization, and data security worldwide may limit the use and adoption of our services and adversely affect our business.”

Removed heading “The short-term and long-term impact of the Basel capital standards remains uncertain.”

Removed heading “Another pandemic or global health crisis like the COVID-19 pandemic may adversely impact our performance and results of operations.”

Removed heading “Contingent liabilities could harm fund performance.”

Removed heading “Carlyle Group Management L.L.C. has significant influence over us and its interests may conflict with ours or yours.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: bankruptcy, default, covenant, write-down
“Investments in real estate debt investments may be unsecured and/or subordinated to a substantial amount of indebtedness and may not be protected by financial covenants. Non-performing real estate loans may require a substantial amount of workout negotiations and/or modification, which may entail, among other things, a substantial reduction in the interest rate and a substantial write-down of the principal of such loan. Investments in commercial mortgage loans are subject to risks of delinquency, foreclosure, and loss of principal. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: tariff, china, taiwan, russia

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Our business and the businesses of the companies in which we invest are materially affected by conditions in the global financial markets, and economic conditions or other events throughout the world that are outside of our control, including, but not limited to, changes in interest rates, availability and cost of credit, inflation rates, availability and cost of energy, economic uncertainty, slowdown in global growth, changes in laws (including laws relating to taxation and regulations on the financial industry), disease, pandemics or other severe public health events, trade barriers, tariffs, commodity prices, currency exchange rates and controls, national and international political circumstances (including government contract terminations or funding pauses, government agency closures, government shutdowns, wars, terrorist acts, or security operations), geopolitical tensions and instability,instability (including the realignment of alliances), social unrest, supply chain pressures, and the effects of climate change. Over the last several years, markets have been affected by the COVID-19introduction pandemic,of significantnew increasestariffs, inmonetary U.S.policy interest rates,uncertainty, inflationary pressures, sharp currency moves, heightened geopolitical tensions (including those between the United States and China, Taiwan and China, Israel and Iran and the Axis of Resistance, and between Ukraine and Russia),tensions, the imposition of export controls, tariffs,controls and trade barriers, the imposition of economic and political sanctions (upon specific individuals or companies and country, industry, and sector-wide restrictions), ongoing trade negotiations with major U.S. trading partners, and changes in U.S. tax regulations. Moreover, our investment funds focused on Asia, and portfolio companies within non-Asia investment funds with significant operations or connectivity and reliance on AsiaAsian companies, and listed securities or debt instruments of companies or industries, could be impacted by any disruptions to the global supply chain that may result from escalating tensions, disputes, or potential conflicts in the region surrounding the Taiwan Strait. The resulting actions taken, the response of the international community, and other factors affecting trade with China or political or economic conditions in Taiwan could disrupt the manufacture of several business criticalbusiness-critical products or hardware components, including semiconductors, which may impact sectors and industries regardless of their business proximity to the Taiwan Strait.
see in full comparison
New text topics: bankruptcy, default, restructuring, covenant
“Our funds’ investments in real estate-related assets, including real estate investment trusts (“REITs”), face additional exposure to changes in property values, tenant defaults, tax law modifications, or failure to maintain REIT qualification—all of which could diminish cash available for distribution. Real estate debt investments can be unsecured, subordinated, or lack protective covenants. Non-performing loans often require restructuring that may reduce principal or interest. Mortgage loan defaults carry foreclosure and deficiency risks. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: investigation, fine, cyberattack, artificial intelligence
“Although we maintain cybersecurity controls designed to prevent cyber incidents from occurring, no security is impenetrable to cyberattacks. It is possible that current and future cyber enforcement activity will target practices that we believe are compliant, but the SEC deems otherwise. In addition, many jurisdictions in which we operate have other laws and regulations relating to data privacy, cybersecurity, data transfers, data localization, and protection of personal information. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: investigation, lawsuit, fine, sanction
“Carlyle is subject to extensive regulation, including periodic examinations, by governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations in the jurisdictions in which it operates around the world. These authorities have regulatory powers dealing with many aspects of financial services, including the authority to grant, and in specific circumstances to cancel, permissions to carry on particular activities. Many of these regulators, including U.S. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: european commission, penalt, breach, artificial intelligence
“In the European Economic Area (“EEA”), the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) establishes requirements applicable to the processing of personal data, affords data protection rights to individuals, and imposes penalties for violations of each EEA state’s law implementing the GDPR, including those that result in serious data breaches. In addition, Brexit took effect in January 2020, which has led to the introduction of the UK GDPR and further legislative changes that increased the burden of processing and transferring personal data of EEA and UK residents. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (399)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Our business and the businesses of the companies in which we invest are materially affected by conditions in the global financial markets, and economic conditions or other events throughout the world that are outside of our control, including, but not limited to, changes in interest rates, availability and cost of credit, inflation rates, availability and cost of energy, economic uncertainty, slowdown in global growth, changes in laws (including laws relating to taxation and regulations on the financial industry), disease, pandemics or other severe public health events, trade barriers, tariffs, commodity prices, currency exchange rates and controls, national and international political circumstances (including government contract terminations or funding pauses, government agency closures, government shutdowns, wars, terrorist acts, or security operations), geopolitical tensions and instability,instability (including the realignment of alliances), social unrest, supply chain pressures, and the effects of climate change. Over the last several years, markets have been affected by the COVID-19introduction pandemic,of significantnew increasestariffs, inmonetary U.S.policy interest rates,uncertainty, inflationary pressures, sharp currency moves, heightened geopolitical tensions (including those between the United States and China, Taiwan and China, Israel and Iran and the Axis of Resistance, and between Ukraine and Russia),tensions, the imposition of export controls, tariffs,controls and trade barriers, the imposition of economic and political sanctions (upon specific individuals or companies and country, industry, and sector-wide restrictions), ongoing trade negotiations with major U.S. trading partners, and changes in U.S. tax regulations. Moreover, our investment funds focused on Asia, and portfolio companies within non-Asia investment funds with significant operations or connectivity and reliance on AsiaAsian companies, and listed securities or debt instruments of companies or industries, could be impacted by any disruptions to the global supply chain that may result from escalating tensions, disputes, or potential conflicts in the region surrounding the Taiwan Strait. The resulting actions taken, the response of the international community, and other factors affecting trade with China or political or economic conditions in Taiwan could disrupt the manufacture of several business criticalbusiness-critical products or hardware components, including semiconductors, which may impact sectors and industries regardless of their business proximity to the Taiwan Strait.

Reworded

Over the twelve months ending on December 31, 2024,2025, the S&P 500 rose by 23.0%,16.4%, while the MSCI All Country World Index (MSCI ACWI) increased by 15.0%.20.6%. This robust full-year performance masks interim volatility.volatility Notably,and fragile underlying public equity market dynamics. After the April 2nd “Liberation Day” tariff announcements in the United States, the S&P 500 fell by over 12% peak-to-trough in the six days that followed. The market rebounded strongly in the weeks that followed and regained its prior peak by mid-summer. In the process of this rebound, both the S&P 500 and global indices have become ever more concentrated in a shifthandful inof JapaneseAI-related monetaryor policyAI-adjacent drovestocks. aThe sharptop appreciationten largest stocks now account for over 40% of the yen.market Thiscapitalization inof turnthe disruptedS&P long-standing500, carryand tradeseight whoseof fundingthose legten restedcompanies onare Japan’sexposed lowto rates.roughly Thethe surgesame AI risks. A change in the currencyoutlook valuefor triggeredAI-related company earnings, or a selloff in Japanese equity markets. Liquidity pressures further exacerbated the selloff. For example, on August 5, 2024, the Nikkei 225 fell 12.4%, while the TOPIX fell 12.2%, their largest respective single day declines since 1987. Global equity markets were impacted as well, albeit to a lesser extent. These seriesreassessment of eventsthese highlightedcompanies’ howvaluations, seeminglycould innocuousdrive and not wholly unexpected changes in policies or othersignificant market conditions may quickly cascade into more significant movements. FactorsOverall, factors that impact global markets, including growth expectations, inflation, interest rates, trade barriers such as tariffs, regulatory, and political environments, can be unpredictable and investor sentiment could change quickly in the future, while market volatility could accelerate in the face of negative macro, monetary, or geopolitical developments. If global markets become unstable, it is possible sellers of assets may readjust their valuations and attractive investment opportunities may become available. On the other hand, the valuations of certain assets we planned to sell in the near future could be negatively impacted, as well as the valuations of our portfolio companies and, as a result, our accrued performance revenues.

Reworded

Market volatility also could adversely affect our fundraising efforts in several ways. Investors often allocate to alternative asset classes (including private equity) based on a target percentage of their overall portfolio. If the value of an investor’s portfolio decreases as a whole, the amount available to allocate to alternative assets (including private equity) could decline. In addition, investors often evaluate the amount of distributions that they have received from existing funds when considering commitments to new funds. ThroughAlthough thenet firstdistributions halfto of 2024, liquidity shortfallsinvestors across all private market asset classes producedturned persistentpositive andin meaningfulthe negativesecond cashquarter flows—moreof capital2025 calls than distributions—for 14the consecutivefirst time in eighteen quarters, a phenomenon not seen on such a scale since the aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis. Cumulatively, across private market asset classes,cumulative contributions have exceeded distributions by nearly $470$550 billion since 2020. This has restricted investor liquidity, which in turn has reduced commitments to private capital assets. Investors also may weigh the likely impact of geopolitical tensions, cross-border regulations, and other factors such as general market volatility and/or a reduction in distributions to investors when considering their allocations to new investment funds. A decrease in the amount an investor commits to our funds could have an impact on the ultimate size of our funds and amount of management fees we generate.

Removed

The availability and cost of financing for significant acquisition and disposition transactions could be impacted if equity and credit markets experience heightened volatility. While base rates are elevated relative to recent historical norms, high yield credit spreads currently are very favorable and remain near historic lows; at 275 basis points, B-rated spreads sit just 40 basis points above the trough hit in the second quarter of 2007. Obtaining financings in both the high yield and leveraged loan markets currently is relatively easy. If credit markets weaken in the future, it is possible that we and our investment funds may not be able to consummate significant acquisition and disposition transactions on acceptable terms, or at all, if we or our funds are unable to finance these types of transactions on attractive terms or if the counterparty to the transaction is unable to secure suitable financing.

Reworded

Global merger and acquisition (“M&A”) volume totaled $3.5$5.1 trillion in 2024,2025, a 12%44% increase from 2023.2024. While total M&A activity appearshas to be normalizing,accelerated, a retrenchment could cause a slowdown in our investment pace, which in turn could have an adverse impact on our ability to generate future performance revenues and to fully invest the available capital in our fundsfunds. andIn particular, while deal activity has been robust over the past year, the exit environment in private markets remains sluggish. A deceleration in M&A activity could further reduce opportunities to exit and realize value from our fund investments. A slowdown in the deployment of our available capital could impact the management fees we earn on thoseour carry fundsinvestments and managed accounts that generate fees based on invested (and not committed) capital. A slowdown in the deployment of our available capital also could adversely affect our ability to raise and the timing of raising successor investment funds. InHowever, 2024,in 2025, we investeddeployed nearly $22$55 billion throughacross our carrybusiness, Thea current28% U.S.increase politicalover environment and the resulting uncertainties regarding actual and potential shifts in U.S.2024.

Added

The current U.S. political environment and the resulting uncertainties regarding actual and potential shifts in U.S.

Removed

foreign investment, trade, taxation, economic, environmental, and other policies under the new administration, as well as the impact of geopolitical tension, such as a deterioration in the bilateral relationship between the United States and China or a further escalation in conflicts in the Middle East and Eastern Europe, could lead to disruption, instability, and volatility in the global markets, which also may have an impact on our exit opportunities across negatively impacted sectors or geographies.

Reworded

foreign investment, trade, taxation, economic, environmental, and other policies under the current administration, as well as the impact of geopolitical tension, such as a deterioration in the bilateral relationship between the United States and China or a further escalation in conflicts in the Middle East, Eastern Europe, and Latin America could lead to disruption, instability, and volatility in the global markets, which also may have an impact on our exit opportunities across negatively impacted sectors or geographies. The newcurrent administration has decided to impose and may decide to impose additional steep tariffs on goods, materials, inputs, and intermediate parts with origins across numerous geographies. Such changes could materially increase input costs for our funds’ portfolio companies and depress margins. TheIn newaddition, the current administration alsohas may seeksought to reduce subsidiessubsidies, block permits and leases for new projects, and roll back favorable terms for investments in renewable energy projects,ventures, which could adversely impact the performance of those strategies in our portfolio. The consequences of previously enacted legislation also could impact our business operations in the future. For example, bipartisan legislation enacted in 2018 has significantly increased and may continue to significantly increase the number and typesexpansion of investment transactions that are subject to the jurisdiction of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”). Under the final regulations implementing the reform legislation, which became effective in 2020, CFIUS has the authority to review,2018 and potentiallythen recommend that the President unwind, block, or impose conditions on certain non-controlling foreign investmentsagain in U.S. businesses that deal in certain ways with “critical technology,” “critical infrastructure,” and/or “sensitive personal data” of U.S. citizens (as those terms are defined in the regulations). In addition, in September 2022, then-President Biden signed an Executive Order directing CFIUS to sharpen its scrutiny of foreign investment that could impact cybersecurity, quantum computing, biotechnology, and sensitive data. CFIUS’ expanded jurisdiction2022 may reduce the number of potential buyers of and investors in U.S. companies and, accordingly, may limit the ability of our funds to realize value and/or exit from certain existing and future investments. Our flexibility in structuring or financing certain transactions may likewise be constrained and we are unable to predict whether and to what extent uncertainty surrounding economic and market conditions or adverse conditions or events in particular sectors may cause our performance to suffer.

Reworded

Because our investment funds will generally make a limited number of investments, and such investments generally involve a high degree of risk, negative financial results in a few of an investment fund’s portfolio companies could severely impact the fund’s total returns. This could materially and adversely affect our ability to raise new funds as well as our operating results and cash flow. During such periods of weakness, our funds’ portfolio companies also may have difficulty expanding their businesses and operations or meeting their debt service obligations or other expenses as they become due, including expenses payable to us. In addition, such negative market conditions could potentially result in a portfolio company entering bankruptcy proceedings or, in the case of certain real estate funds, the abandonment or foreclosure of investments, thereby potentially resulting in a complete loss of the fund’s investment in such portfolio company or real assets and a significant negative impact to the fund’s performance and consequently our operating results and cash flow, as well as to our reputation. Negative market conditions also could increase the risk of default with respect to investments held by our funds that have significant debt investments, such as our Global Credit funds. Moreover, as capital markets activity slows, we may experience a corresponding reduction in the capital markets fees we earn through GCMGlobal Capital Markets in connection with activities related to the underwriting, issuance, and placement of debt and equity securities.

Reworded

In addition, during periods of difficult market conditions or slowdowns, the valuations of the investments in our carry funds could suffer. If we were to realize investments at these lower values, we may not achieve investment returns in excess of return hurdles required to realize performance revenues or we may become obligated to repay performance revenues previously received by us. The payment of less or no performance revenues could cause our cash flow from operations to significantly decrease, which could materially and adversely affect our liquidity position and the amount of cash we have on hand to conduct our operations and to dividend to our stockholders. The generation of less performance revenues also could impact our leverage ratios and compliance with our termrevolving loancredit facility covenants. Having less cash on hand could in turn require us to rely on other sources of cash (such as the capital markets, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all) to conduct our operations, which include, for example, funding significant general partner and co-investment commitments to our carry funds. In addition, during adverse economic and market conditions, we may not be able to renew or refinance all or part of our credit facility or find alternate financing on commercially reasonable terms. As a result, our uses of cash may exceed our sources of cash, thereby potentially affecting our liquidity position.

Added

Moreover, during adverse economic and market conditions, we may not be able to renew or refinance all or part of our credit facility or find alternate financing on commercially reasonable terms. As a result, our uses of cash may exceed our sources of cash, thereby potentially affecting our liquidity position.

Added

Severe public health events also may occur from time to time, and could directly and indirectly impact us in material respects that we are unable to predict or control, including by threatening our employees’ well-being and morale and interrupting business activities. Moreover, related factors may materially and adversely affect us, including the effectiveness of governmental responses, the extension, amendment, or withdrawal of any government programs or initiatives and the timing and speed of economic recovery. Actions taken in response may contribute to significant volatility in financial markets, resulting in increased volatility in equity prices, material interest rate changes, supply chain disruptions, such as simultaneous supply and demand shock in global, regional, and national economies, and an increase in inflationary pressures.

Reworded

We periodically use indebtedness as a means to finance our business operations, which exposes us to risks associated with using leverage. We are dependent on financial institutions extending credit to us on reasonable terms to finance our business. There is no guarantee that financial institutions will continue to extend credit to us or will renew the existing credit agreements we have with them on as favorable terms or at all, or that we will be able to refinance our outstanding notes or other obligations when they mature. In addition, the incurrence of additional debt in the future could result in downgrades of our existing corporate credit ratings, which could limit the availability of future financing and/or increase our cost of borrowing. As borrowings under our creditsenior facilitynotes or any other indebtedness mature, we may be required to refinance them by entering into a new facility or issuing additional debt, which could result in higher borrowing costs, or to issue additional equity, which would dilute existing stockholders. We also could repay them by using cash on hand, cash provided by our continuing operations, or cash from the sale of our assets, which could reduce dividends to our stockholders. Moreover, we could have difficulty entering into new facilities or issuing debt or equity securities in the future on attractive terms, or at all.

Reworded

From time to time, we may access the capital markets by issuing debt securities. For example, in 2021,September 2025, we issued $500senior millionunsecured bonds with aggregate principal amount of 4.625%$800.0 subordinated notesmillion due MaySeptember 2061.2035. We also have other senior notes and junior subordinated notes with an aggregate principal amount of $1,375.0$1,875.0 million as of December 31, 2024,2025, as well as a credit agreement that provides a $1.0 billion revolving facility with a final maturity date of AprilMay 29, 20272030 (see Note 6, Borrowings, to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding our senior and subordinated notes and credit agreements). The credit agreement contains financial and non-financial covenants with which we need to comply to maintain access to this source of liquidity. Noncompliance with any of the financial or non-financial covenants without cure or waiver would constitute an event of default, and an event of default resulting from a breach of certain financial or non-financial covenants could result, at the option of the lenders, in an acceleration of the principal and interest outstanding, and a termination of the credit agreement. In addition, to the extent we incur additional debt relative to our current level of earnings or experience a decrease in our level of earnings, our credit rating could be adversely impacted, which would increase our interest expense under our credit facility. Standard & Poor’s and Fitch both affirmed our “A-” credit rating with a stable rating outlook in Octoberthe 2024.fourth quarter of 2025.

Reworded

In addition, our cash flow may fluctuate significantly because we receive performance allocations from our carry funds only when investments are realized and achieve a certain preferred return. This also contributes to the volatility of our cash flow. Performance allocations depend on our carry funds’ performance and opportunities for realizing gains, which may be limited. It takes a substantial period of time to realize the cash value (or other proceeds) of an investment. Even if an investment proves to be profitable, it may be a number of years before any profits can be realized, particularly if market conditions wereare unaccommodating. We cannot predict when, or if, any realization of investments will occur. The valuations of, and realization opportunities for, investments made by our funds could also be subject to high volatility as a result of uncertainty or potential changes to governmental policy with respect to, among other things, tax, trade, immigration, healthcare, labor, infrastructure, and energy.

Reworded

Prior to our receiving any performance allocations in respect of realization of a profitable investment, 100% of the proceeds of that investment generally must be paid to the investors in that carry fund until they have recovered certain fees and expenses and achieved a certain return on all realized investments by that carry fund as well as a recovery of any unrealized losses. A particular realization event may have a significant impact on our results for that particular quarter that may not be replicated in subsequent quarters. We recognize revenue on investments in our investment funds based on our allocable share of realized and unrealized gains (or losses) reported by such investment funds,funds. and aA decline in realized or unrealized gains, or an increase in realized or unrealized losses, would adversely affect our revenue and possibly cash flow, which could further increase the volatility of our quarterly results. Because our carry funds have preferred return thresholds to investors that need to be met prior to our receiving any performance allocations, substantial declines in the carrying value of the investment portfolios of a carry fund can significantly delay or eliminate any performance allocations paid to us in respect of that fund because the value of the assets in the fund would need to recover to their aggregate cost basis plus the preferred return over time before we would be entitled to receive any performance allocations from that fund.

Reworded

Given our focus on achieving superior investment performance and maintaining and strengthening investor relations, we may reduce our AUM, restrain its growth, warehouse investments on our balance sheet for new funds, reduce our fees, or otherwise alter the terms under which we do business when we deem it in the best interest of our investors—even in circumstances where such actions might be contrary to the near-term interests of our stockholders.

Reworded

From time to time if we decide it is in the best interests of our stakeholders, we may take actions that could reduce the profits we could otherwise realize in the short term. While we believe that our commitment to treating our investors fairly is in the long-term interest of us and our stockholders, our stockholders should understand we may take actions that could adversely impact our short-term profitability, and there is no guarantee that such actions will benefit us in the long term. The means by which we seek to achieve superior investment performance in each of our strategies could include limiting the AUM in our strategies to an amount that we believe can be invested appropriately in accordance with our investment philosophy and current or anticipated economic and market conditions. In addition, we may seek to exit or end unprofitable or subscale investments, which may reduce our AUM, including Fee-earning AUM, and/or management fees while generally improving our FRE margins. We have made, and expect to continue making, balance sheet investments to seed certain funds during their early fundraising stages, and we may later sell those investments to the funds at the lower of our original cost or fair value, without interest, regardless of how long we held them. If we do not sell a warehoused investment to a fund, we may sell it to another buyer at a price below our cost or hold it longer than intended, exposing us to value fluctuations and changing business conditions. We also may voluntarily reduce management fee or incentive fee rates and terms for certain of our funds or strategies when we deem it appropriate, even when doing so may reduce our short-term revenue. For instance, in order to enhance our relationship with certain fund investors, we have reduced management fees or ceased charging management fees on certain funds in specific instances. In certain investment funds, we have agreed to charge management fees based on invested capital or net asset value as opposed to charging management fees based on committed capital. In certain cases, we have provided “fee holidays” during which we do not charge management fees for a certain period of time. We also may receive requests to reduce management fees on other funds in the future. See “Risks Related to Our Business Operations— Risks Related to the Assets We Manage—Our investors may negotiate to pay us lower management fees and the economic terms of our future funds may be less favorable to us than those of our existing funds, which could adversely affect our revenues.”

Reworded

Schwartz, our co-foundersco-founders, and other senior Carlyle professionals, including our Co-Presidents, the information and deal flow they generate during the normal course of their activities, and the synergies among the diverse fields of expertise and knowledge held by our professionals. Accordingly, our success will depend on the continued service of these individuals, who are not obligated to remain employed with us. Several key personnel have left the firm in the past and others may do so in the future, and we cannot predict the impact that the departure of any key personnel will have on our ability to achieve our investment objectives. For example, the governing agreements of many of our funds generally provide investors with the ability to terminate the investment period in the event that certain “key persons” in the fund do not meet the specified time commitment to the fund or our firm ceases to control the general partner. The loss of the services of any such persons could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, net income, and cash flows and could harm our ability to maintain or grow AUM in existing funds or raise additional funds in the future. Our senior Carlyle professionals possess substantial experience and expertise and have strong business relationships with our investors and other members of the business community. As a result, the loss of these personnel could jeopardize our relationships with such parties and result in the reduction of AUM or fewer investment opportunities. We also face potential threats to our physical security, including to our offices and the safety and well-being of our people, including our senior Carlyle professionals. These threats could involve terrorism, insider threats, targeted threats against our senior Carlyle professionals, workplace violence, or civil unrest, all of which could adversely affect us.

Removed

Our most important asset is our people, and our continued success is highly dependent upon the efforts of our senior Carlyle professionals and other employees. Our future success and growth depends to a substantial degree on our ability to retain and motivate our senior Carlyle professionals and other employees to strategically recruit, retain, and motivate talented personnel, including senior Carlyle professionals. The market for qualified professionals is extremely competitive across levels and areas of expertise, and we may not be successful in our efforts to recruit, retain, and motivate these professionals. There also has been a shift to a hybrid work model and, in our recruiting efforts, we have seen increased focus by prospective candidates on remote and hybrid work arrangements and arrangements providing more flexibility, including around location.

Reworded

AlthoughOur wemost generallyimportant haveasset movedis our people, and our continued success is highly dependent upon the efforts of our senior Carlyle professionals and other employees. Our future success and growth depends to a hybridsubstantial workdegree modelon our ability to retain and motivate our senior Carlyle professionals and other employees to strategically recruit, retain, and motivate talented personnel, including senior Carlyle professionals. The market for qualified professionals is extremely competitive across levels and areas of expertise, particularly in which manylight of increasingly unpredictable enforcement of immigration laws and visa requirements, and we may not be successful in our employees are permittedefforts to workrecruit, remotely for a designated portion of their working timeretain, and aremotivate expectedthese to come to a Carlyle office for a designated portion of their working time, we continue to see focus on remote work arrangements.professionals. We also have experienced upward pressure on compensation packages given the increased competition to hire and retain talented personnel, and we may be required to adjust the amount of cash compensation and types, terms, and amounts of equity and other long-term incentives we provide to our employees, which could have positive or negative effects on the financial metrics commonly used to measure our performance. Even when we offer top-of-market compensation packages, we may not be able to attract and retain all of our desired personnel due to shifting employee priorities. In addition, the minimum retained ownership requirements and transfer restrictions to which equity incentives are subject in certain instances lapse over time, may not be enforceable in all cases, and can be waived. There is no guarantee that the noncompetition and nonsolicitation agreements to which certain of our senior Carlyle professionals are subject, together with our other arrangements with them, will prevent them from leaving, joining our competitors, or otherwise competing with us. In addition, there is no assurance that such agreements will be enforceable in all cases. In this respect, we continue to monitor developments on the state and federal level. These noncompetition and nonsolicitation agreements also expire after a certain period of time, at which point such senior Carlyle professionals would be free to compete against us and solicit our clients and employees. In this respect, in April 2024, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) published a final rule that would generally prohibit post-employment noncompete clauses (or other clauses with comparable effect) in agreements between employers and their employees, subject to limited exceptions, although enforcement of the final rule has been enjoined. We are continuing to monitor the status of the final rule, including with the new administration, and the impact it may have on our ability to recruit and retain our professionals.

Reworded

We have granted and expect to grant equity awards in respect of our shares of common stock. This includes awards from our Equity Incentive Plan, with respect to which our shareholders approved an additional 19.0 million shares for the issuance of awards at our 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders,Plan and an award of restricted stock units to our Chief Executive Officer in connection with his hiring, which were granted outside of the Equity Incentive Plan and with respect to which, as of December 31, 2024,2025, we have granted a total of approximately 7.27.4 million restricted stock units (including dividend equivalent units that are credited on such award). The prior and future grants of equity awards in respect of our shares of common stock have caused and will cause dilution. While we evaluate the grant of equity awards from our Equity Incentive Plan to employees on an annual basis, the size of the grants, if any, is made at our discretion and may vary significantly from year-to-year, including as the result of special programs or significant senior personnel hirings. If we increase the use of equity awards from our Equity Incentive Plan in the future, expenses associated with equity-based compensation may increase materially. In 2024, we incurred equity compensation expenses of $467.9 million in connection with grants of restricted stock units. In February 2024, we granted a total of 13.2 million restricted stock units to senior Carlyle professionals that are eligible to vest in installments over a period of three years based on the achievement of absolute stock price targets of 120% (which were satisfied during the fourth quarter of 2024),120%, 140%, and 160% of the applicable starting share price.price, each of which targets has been satisfied as of December 31, 2025. In addition, in February 2025, we granted a total of 4.88.1 million restricted stock units to Carlyle professionals, and in February 2026, we granted a total of 5.8 million restricted stock units to Carlyle professionals. Following the foregoing grants, taken together with other restricted stock unit grants since thea initialnew approvalshare ofreserve was approved for the Equity Incentive Plan in June 2021, there were 25.717.6 million remaining shares of common stock available for grant under the Equity Incentive Plan.Plan as of February 27, 2026.

Reworded

As of December 31, 2024,2025, our employees held an aggregate of 17.225.6 million unvested restricted stock units, which vest over various time periods (generally from one year to three-and-a-halffour years from the date of grant) and/or subject14.2 million of which also have vesting conditions tied to the achievement of variousabsolute performancestock targets.price Alltargets over a period of thethree sharesto offour common stock held by our co-founders are fully vested.years. In order to recruit and retain existing and future senior Carlyle professionals and other key personnel, we may need to increase the level of compensation that we pay to them, which could include grants of significant amounts of restricted stock unit awards or other equity incentive awards under our Equity Incentive Plan. Accordingly, as we promote or hire new senior Carlyle professionals and other key personnel over time or attempt to retain the services of certain of our key personnel, we may increase the level of compensation we pay to these individuals, which could cause our total employee compensation and benefits expense as a percentage of our total revenue to increase and adversely affect our profitability.

Reworded

Our organizational documents do not limit our ability to enter into new lines of business, and we may expand into new investment strategies, geographic markets, businesses, types of investors, and investment products. We intend to seek to grow our businesses by increasing AUM in existing businesses, pursuing new investment strategies (including investment opportunities in new asset classes), developing new types of investment structures and products (such as publicly listed vehicles, separately managed accounts, and structured products), expanding into new geographic markets and businesses and seeking investments from investor bases we have traditionally not pursued, such as individual investors, which subject us to additional risk. See also “Risks Related to Our Business Operations—Risks Related to the Assets We Manage—We have increasingly undertaken business initiatives to increase the number and type of investment products we offer to retailindividual investors, which could expose us to new and greater levels of risk.” We have opened many offices to conduct our asset management and capital markets businesses around the world in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia-Pacific, which we intend to grow and expand.

Reworded

We alsohave opened many offices to conduct our asset management and capital markets businesses around the world in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia-Pacific, which we intend to grow and expand. We have also launched a number of new investment initiatives in various asset classes or geographies, and increasingly manage investment vehicles owned by individual investors, which subject us to additional risk. Introducing new types of investment structures and products could increase the complexities involved in managing such investments, including ensuring compliance with applicable regulatory requirements and terms of the investment vehicles.

Reworded

Our organic growth strategy focuses on providing resources to foster business expansion, such that we achieve a level of scale and profitability. Given our diverse platform, these initiatives could create conflicts of interests with existing products, increase our costs, and expose us to new market risks and legal and regulatory requirements. The success of our organic growth strategy will also will depend on, among other things, our ability to correctly identify and create products that appeal to the limited partners of our funds and vehicles. While we have made significant expenditures to develop these new strategies and products, there is no assurance that they will achieve a satisfactory level of scale and profitability.

Reworded

WeIn addition, we have pursued and may continue to pursue growth through acquisitions of, or investments in, new businesses, other investment management companies, acquisitions of critical business partners, strategic partnerships, other alternative or traditional investment managers, or other strategic initiatives that also may include entering into new lines of business. InWe addition, wealso expect opportunities willmay arise to acquire other alternative or traditional investment managers. For example, in August 2022, we acquired Abingworth, a life sciences investment firm, to expand our healthcare investment platform with the addition of nearly $2 billion in AUM and a specialized team of over 20 investment professionals and advisors. The integration of Abingworth with us, and Carlyle’s corresponding entry into the life sciences industry, may pose some or all of the risks noted below. See “Risks Related to Our Business Operations—Industry Risks Related to the Assets We Manage—Our funds’ investments in the life sciences industry may expose us to increased risks.”

Reworded

We, our vendors, investors, and other stakeholders rely heavily on financial, accounting, information, and other data processing systems. Collectively, we face various security threats on a regular basis, including ongoing cybersecurity threats to and attacks on our information technology infrastructure that are intended to gain access to our proprietary information, destroy data, or disable, degrade, or sabotage our systems. These security threats originate from a wide variety of sources, including known or unknown external third parties and current or former employees and contractors who have or had access to our facilities, systems, and information.

Reworded

Those who have or had authorized access to our networks, including current and former employees and contractors, may introduce vulnerabilities in our systems by user error or if they are the target of “phishing,” social engineering, bribery, coercion, or harbor malice toward us. We therefore have implemented a security awareness training program. The objective of this program is to inform Carlyle personnel and contractors of their responsibility for information security and includes online training, live awareness events, and phishing simulations. This training is in addition to our existing required onboarding and annual cybersecurity trainings. In addition,Moreover, trends to outsource additional work, particularly information technology work, introduce heightened risks such as improper access management, near-term productivity loss, and threats arising from contractor machines accessing Carlyle networks.

Reworded

In addition, we rely on third-party service providers for certain aspects of our business, including for certain information systems and technology and administration of our business development companies, registered investment companies, structured credit funds, and GlobalCarlyle Investment SolutionsAlpInvest segment. For example, Carlyle contracts information system backup and recovery services to certain companies. These third-party service providers have faced and continue to face ongoing cybersecurity threats and, as a result, unauthorized individuals could improperly gain access to our confidential data. Any attack on or interruption or deterioration in the performance of these third parties or failures of their information systems and technology could also impair the quality of the funds’ operations, affect our reputation, and adversely affect our businesses.

Reworded

In addition, we and our portfolio companies mayface notincreased bedifficulty ablein to obtainobtaining or maintainmaintaining sufficient insurance (including cyber insurance) on commercially reasonable terms or with adequate coverage levels against potential liabilities weand may face in connection with potential claims, whichthat could have a material adverse effect on our business. We may face a risk of loss from a variety of types of claims, including related to securities, antitrust, contracts, cyber incidents, fraud, business interruption, and various other potential claims, whether or not such claims are valid.claims. Insurance and other safeguards maywill often only partially reimburse us for our losses, if at all, and if a claim is successful and exceeds or is not covered by our insurance policies, we mayare beresponsible requiredfor toany payshortfall, including if the shortfall is a substantial amount in respect of such successful claim.amount. Because of market conditions, premiums, and deductibles for certain insurance policies, particularly directors and officers, cyber, and property insurance, have increased substantially across the industry and may increase further and, in some instances, certain insurance may become unavailable or available only for reduced amounts of coverage. Moreover, the dollar amount of claims and/or the number of claims we experience also may increase at any time, which may have the result of further increasing our costs.

Reworded

Certain losses of a catastrophic nature, such as wars, systemic risk associated with cyber-kinetic warfare, earthquakes, floods, typhoons, pandemics (such as COVID-19), terrorist attacks, or other similar events may be uninsurable or may only be insurable at rates that are so high that maintaining coverage would cause an adverse impact on our business, our investment funds, and their portfolio companies. In general, losses related to terrorism and catastrophic nation-state hacks are becoming harder and more expensive to insure against. In this respect, some insurers are excluding coverage of terrorist acts and catastrophic nation-state hacks from their all-risk policies. In some cases, insurers are offering significantly limited coverage against terrorist acts for additional premiums, which can greatly increase the total cost of casualty insurance for a property.property or cyber insurance. As a result, we, our investment funds, and their portfolio companies may not be insured or fully insured against terrorism or certain other catastrophic losses.

Reworded

Our portfolio companies also rely on data and processing systems and the secure processing, storage, and transmission of information including highly sensitive financial, medical, and critical infrastructure data. A disruption or compromise of these systems, including from a cyber-attack, cyber-incident, or other outage, could have a material adverse effect on the value of these businesses. Our investment funds may invest in strategic assets having a national or regional profile or in infrastructure assets, the nature of which could expose them to a greater risk of being subject to a terrorist attack or security breach than other assets or businesses. Such an event may have adverse consequences on our investment or assets of the same type or may require portfolio companies to increase preventative security measures or expand insurance coverage. There is increasing regulation of data transfers as a national security issue that could limit how we and our portfolio companies are able to utilize data and those limits could have an adverse effect on our and our portfolio companies’ business results.

Reworded

In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data, including our proprietary business information and intellectual property, and personally identifiable information of our employees, investors, potential investors, and others, in our data centers, on our networks, on our cloud environments, and with our third-party service providers. Such data may be subject to U.S. and foreign data protection and privacy laws and other contractual obligations. The secure processing, maintenance, and transmission of this information are critical to our operations. Although we take various measures and have made, and will continue to make, significant investments to ensure the integrity of our systems and to safeguard against such failures or security breaches, including mechanisms for governance, strategy, and risk management, there can be no assurance that these measures and investments will provide adequate protection. In this respect, the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated these risks due to heavier and continued reliance on online communication and a hybrid work environment that continues, which may be less secure, and there has been a significant increase in malicious cyber activity involving ransomware, extortion, and business email compromise. In 2024,2025, Carlyle experienced no material cyber incidents and responded promptly and effectively to routine events, such as user errors, incidental data leakage, phishing campaigns, system misconfigurations, software failures, and vendor breach notifications, resulting in no material harm to Carlyle.

Reworded

In addition, wewe, our employees, our investors, and ourthe employeespublic have been and expect to continue to be the target of fraudulent calls and emails, the subject of impersonations, and fraudulent requests for money, including attempts to redirect material payment amounts to fraudulent bank accounts, and other forms of spam attacks, phishing or other social engineering, supply chain attacks, ransomware, or other events. We also have been, and could in the future be, the target of a type of wire transfer fraud known as business email compromise where a third partythird-party seeks to benefit from misrepresenting an employee or fund investor by improperly authorizing a wire transfer or change in wire instructions. While our policies and procedures have been largely effective against this fraud to date, a significant actual or potential theft, loss, corruption, exposure, fraudulent use or misuse of investor, employee, or other personally identifiable or proprietary business data, whether by third parties or as a result of employee malfeasance or otherwise, noncompliance with our contractual or other legal obligations regarding such data or intellectual property, or a violation of our privacy and security policies with respect to such data could result in significant remediation and other costs, fines, litigation, or regulatory actions against us by the U.S. federal and state governments, the European Union, or other jurisdictions, or by various regulatory organizations or exchanges. Such an event also could disrupt our operations and the services we provide to investors, damage our reputation, result in a loss of a competitive advantage, impact our ability to provide timely and accurate financial data, and cause a loss of confidence in our services and financial reporting, which could adversely affect our business, revenues, competitive position, and investor confidence.

Reworded

The use of artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies (collectively, “AI Technologies”), and the overall adoption of AI Technologies throughout society, create opportunities for us, our funds, investment vehicles and accounts, and portfolio companies, as well as new and unpredictable competitive, operational, legal, and regulatory risks. We use and plan to expand our use of AI Technologies in connection with our business and investment activities and selections, and our portfolio companies and investments also use such technologies.technologies, including but not limited to automation of operational tasks, identification of investment opportunity, investment due diligence, and investment decision-making. We and our portfolio companies continue to evaluate the rapidly evolving landscape of AI Technologies. Actual use of AI Technologies varies across our business, funds and portfolio companies, and investments. While we expect, from time to time, to adopt and adjust usage policies and procedures governing the use of AI Technologies by our personnel, there is a risk of misuse of such AI Technologies, failure of such AI Technologies to be available or to perform, orand data leakage on account of use of such AI Technologies, any of which could cause a material harm to us or our portfolio companies. In addition, some of our competitors may be more successful than us in the development and implementation of new technologies, including services and platforms based on artificial intelligence,intelligence to address investor demands or improve operations. If we are unable to adequately advance our capabilities in these areas, or do so at a slower pace than others in our industry, we may be at a competitive disadvantage.

Reworded

In addition, AI Technologies are reliant on the collection and analysis of large amounts of data and complex algorithms. In this respect, it is not possible or practicable to incorporate all relevant data into models that AI Technologies utilize to operate. Therefore, it is expected that the data in such models will contain a degree of inaccuracy and error, potentially to a material degree, and that such data and algorithms could otherwise be inadequate or flawed, which would likely degrade the effectiveness of AI Technologies and could adversely impact us and our portfolio companies and investments to the extent we or they rely on the work product of such AI Technologies. We expect to be involved in the collection of such data only in the context of limited custom development of tools supporting bespoke AI product developments, but these tools are likely to contain and produce inaccurate information from time to time that will be difficult to identify and mitigate. In this respect, reliance on AI-generated data or analysis that contains “hallucinations” or errors could lead to flawed investment decisions or regulatory reporting inaccuracies.

Reworded

Moreover, use of AI Technologies may include the input of sensitive personal information, trade secrets, and other protected data by both us and third parties and could result in the exposure of such information, for example, by becoming part of a dataset that is generally accessible by AI Technologies applications and users. AIData Technologiessources such as those we license and theirthose currentwe obtain via our business operations may become unavailable and potentiallimit futureour applications,ability includingto establish or maintain AI Technologies, or data sources may seek to enjoin our use or receive a portion of related revenue, which would result in the private investmentlosses and financiallimit sectors,our continuegrowth. toFor rapidlyexample, evolve,we may use and market our use of AI Technologies mayin requirea compliancemanner withthat legalchanges over time due to model error rates, staffing issues, compute limitations, or regulatoryother frameworksdevelopments that aremake notprior fullymarketing developedof or tested and which may subject us to litigation and regulatory actions. For example, the EU has enacted the AI Act and various other jurisdictions have proposed or finalized laws that create regulatory risk around theour use of AI Technologies orinaccurate, threatenand to limit or eliminate our ability to use AI Technologies. It is impossible to predictgiven the full extentspeed of currentthese orchanges, futurenot risksinform relatedinvestors thereto.of these changes before they go into effect.

Added

AI Technologies and their current and potential future applications, including in the private investment and financial sectors, continue to rapidly evolve, and our use of AI Technologies may require compliance with legal or regulatory frameworks that are not fully developed or tested and which may subject us to litigation and regulatory actions. For example, the EU has enacted the AI Act and various other jurisdictions have proposed or finalized laws that create regulatory risk around the use of AI Technologies or threaten to limit or eliminate our ability to use AI Technologies. It is impossible to predict the full extent of current or future risks related thereto.

Added

Rapidly developing and changing global data security and privacy laws and regulations could increase compliance costs and subject us to enforcement risks and reputational damage.

Removed

Laws and regulations relating to privacy, data protection, data transfers, data localization, and data security worldwide may limit the use and adoption of our services and adversely affect our business.

Removed

Legislators and regulators around the world identify data security and privacy as top priorities. As a result, we are subject to an increasing variety of federal, state, local, and international laws, directives, and regulations, as well as contractual obligations, relating to the collection, use, retention, security, disclosure, transfer, and other processing of personal information and other confidential data. The global legal frameworks for privacy, data protection, and data transfers are rapidly evolving and are likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future. Certain of our activities may be subject to the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), U.S. state privacy laws, the Cayman Islands Data Protection Act (“DPA”), the UK Data Protection Act (“UK GDPR”), the Personal Information Protection Law (the “PIPL”), and other existing and developing laws and regulations.

Removed

For example, in March 2022, the SEC issued a proposed rule, which was finalized in July 2023, requiring public companies to report material cybersecurity incidents on Form 8-K and mandate disclosure of cybersecurity risk management, strategy, and governance. In light of these proposed and final rules and the focus of federal regulators on cybersecurity generally in recent years, we expect continued and increasing SEC enforcement activity related to cybersecurity matters, including by the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations in its examination programs, where cybersecurity has been prioritized with an emphasis on, among other things, proper configuration of network storage devices, information security governance, and policies and procedures related to retail trading information security.

Removed

Although we maintain cybersecurity controls designed to prevent cyber incidents from occurring, no security is impenetrable to cyberattacks. It is possible that current and future cyber enforcement activity will target practices that we believe are compliant, but the SEC deems otherwise. In addition, many jurisdictions in which we operate have other laws and regulations relating to data privacy, cybersecurity, data transfers, data localization, and protection of personal information. Our use of AI technologies also could subject us to additional cybersecurity risks as well as regulatory scrutiny. See “Risk Related to Our Company—Use of artificial intelligence technology by us could lead to the exposure of our data or other adverse effects and increase competitive, operational, legal, and regulatory risks in ways that we cannot predict.” Any regulatory investigation into compliance with these laws and regulations would be costly and could lead to significant fines, service interruption, loss of licensure, and other harms to the Company.

Removed

In the European Economic Area (“EEA”), the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) establishes requirements applicable to the processing of personal data, affords data protection rights to individuals, and imposes penalties for violations of each EEA state’s law implementing the GDPR, including those that result in serious data breaches. In addition, Brexit took effect in January 2020, which has led to the introduction of the UK GDPR and further legislative changes that increased the burden of processing and transferring personal data of EEA and UK residents. To satisfy these requirements, we may need to make use of alternative data transfer mechanisms such as standard contractual clauses approved by the European Commission, or the International Data Transfer Agreement approved by the UK Information Commissioner’s Office (“ICO”). Any future updates to data transfer rules may require us to expend significant resources to update our contractual arrangements and to otherwise comply with such obligations. In particular, while the UK GDPR remains materially equivalent to the GDPR at present, the UK government recently has introduced the draft Data (Use and Access) Bill which, if it becomes law, has the potential to impact the finding by the European Commission on June 28, 2021 that the UK provides adequate protection for personal data transferred from the EEA to UK. This would, in turn, increase our compliance burden with respect to the transfer of personal data between the EEA and UK. We may experience additional costs to comply with these changes, should they take effect and, more generally, we, our third-party service providers, and our customers face the potential for the ICO and regulators in the EEA to apply different standards to the transfer of personal data from the UK and EEA to the United States and other jurisdictions. Moreover, the EEA and the UK are considering or have enacted a variety of other laws and regulations such as the Digital Operational Resilience Act, or DORA (EEA), Online Safety Act (UK), and the Artificial Intelligence Act (EEA), all of which could have a material impact on Carlyle and its portfolio companies’ ability to conduct our businesses. We cannot predict how these data protection laws or regulations may develop.

Removed

China continues to strengthen its protections of personal information and tighten control over cross-border data transfers with the implementation of the Cybersecurity Law (“CSL”), Data Security Law (the “DSL”), and the Personal Information Protection Law (the “PIPL”). These laws may affect the business of Carlyle and our portfolio companies in the following ways. First, Carlyle and our portfolio companies may be subject to these laws when conducting business and processing personal information or other data in China. Second, these laws may apply extra-territorially to the processing of personal information and other data originating in China when conducted by Carlyle or our portfolio companies outside of China. Third, these laws may impose new regulations on cross-border data transfers and transfers to third-party vendors conducted by Carlyle and our portfolio companies. The PIPL imposes several conditions that limit certain cross-border transfer of personal information of Chinese residents, while the DSL restricts transfer of “important data” outside of China. The scope of “important data” remains unclear but may include certain data collected and/or generated by Carlyle and our portfolio companies in China, in which case these restrictions could harm Carlyle and its portfolio companies that rely on the ability to freely transfer data outside China. Finally, Carlyle and our portfolio companies may be contractually bound by certain compliance obligations when dealing with counterparties in China as a result of these laws.

Removed

In addition, the National Intelligence Law (“NIL”), coupled with the Espionage Act, allows authorities to request organizations like Carlyle and its portfolio companies to provide necessary support, assistance, and cooperation to the Chinese government. The NIL codifies broad police power, including the ability for intelligence officials to enter relevant restricted areas and venues, learn from and question relevant organizations, and collect relevant files, materials, or items, including electronic information.

Removed

The costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, the PIPL, CSL, DSL, and NIL, along with any other cybersecurity and related laws in China, could have an adverse impact on our business and increase our compliance burden. A determination by the Chinese government that Carlyle or its portfolio companies have violated one of these laws could result in a variety of penalties, including fines of up to 5% of global revenues, warnings, disgorgement, suspension of business activities or licenses, shutting down websites or applications that collect sensitive information, and revocation of business licenses or relevant permits. Certain penalties also can apply to individual staff members responsible for a violation. The lack of clarity and regulatory guidance on some issues adds to the compliance risks. Any inability, or perceived inability, to adequately address privacy and data protection concerns, or comply with Chinese laws, regulations, policies, industry standards, contractual obligations, or other legal obligations could result in additional cost and liability and could damage our reputation and adversely affect our business and the business of our portfolio companies.

Removed

Many other foreign countries and governmental bodies in jurisdictions where Carlyle and our portfolio companies conduct business have privacy and data protection laws and regulations that are more restrictive than those in the United States.

Removed

For example, the Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance, the Australian Privacy Act, and the Brazilian Bank Secrecy Law. Global laws in this area are rapidly increasing in the scope and depth of their requirements, which are often extra-territorial in nature, and global regulators are seeking to enforce their countries’ laws outside of their borders. In addition, we frequently have added privacy compliance requirements as a result of our contractual obligations with counterparties. These legal and contractual obligations heighten our privacy obligations in the ordinary course of conducting our business in the United States and internationally.

Removed

In the United States, federal privacy legislation is being considered by Congress and may lead to significant new obligations for us and our portfolio companies. In the interim, a number of state laws are being passed, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), which took effect in January 2020. The CCPA provides for enhanced consumer protections for California residents, a private right of action for certain data breaches that is expected to increase related litigation, and statutory fines for CCPA violations. In addition, the CCPA requires covered companies to provide certain disclosures to California residents and provides such residents ways to opt-out of certain sales of personal information.

Removed

California voters also approved the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”) in November 2020. Effective starting on January 1, 2023, the CPRA made significant modifications to the CCPA, including by expanding rights with respect to certain sensitive personal information and creating a new state agency for enforcing the CCPA. Unless and until a federal privacy law that preempts state laws is enacted, states will continue to shape the data privacy environment nationally. For example, Virginia enacted the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (the “VCDPA”), effective January 1, 2023, Colorado passed the Colorado Privacy Rights Act (the “CPA”), effective July 1, 2023, Connecticut passed the Connecticut Data Privacy Act (the “CDPA”), effective July 1, 2023, and Utah passed the Utah Consumer Privacy Act (the “UCPA”), effective December 31, 2023. Several other U.S. states enacted privacy laws in 2023 that will take effect in the years to come and many other proposals exist in states across the United States that could increase our potential liability, increase our compliance costs, and affect our ability to process personal information integral to our business. Aspects of these state privacy statutes remain unclear, resulting in further legal uncertainty and potentially requiring us to modify our data practices and policies and to incur substantial additional compliance costs.

Removed

Complying with various existing, proposed, or yet to be proposed laws, regulations, amendments to or re-interpretations of existing laws and regulations, and contractual or other obligations relating to privacy, data protection, data transfers, data localization, or information security may require us to make changes to our services to enable us or our customers to meet new legal requirements, incur substantial operational costs, modify our data practices and policies, and restrict our business operations. Any actual or perceived failure by us to comply with these laws, regulations, or other obligations may lead to significant fines, penalties, regulatory investigations, lawsuits, costs for remediation, and other liabilities.

Reworded

ForWe instance,and regulatoryour investigationsfunds’ orportfolio penaltiescompanies relatedare subject to various risks and costs associated with the collection, storage, transmission, and other processing of personal data. This personal data protectionis failureswide couldranging leadand relates to negativeour publicityinvestors, employees, contractors, and mayother causecounterparties ourand investorsthird to lose confidence in the effectiveness of our security measures.parties. Any inability, or perceived inability, even if unfounded, by us to adequately address privacy and data protection concerns, or comply with applicable privacy laws, regulations, policies, industry standards, or related contractual obligations, oreven otherif legal obligations alsounfounded, could result in additional costregulatory and liabilitythird-party liability, increased costs, disruptions to business and could damage our reputationoperations, and adverselyreputational affect our business.damage.

Added

Data security and privacy compliance obligations to which we are subject impose compliance costs on us, which could increase significantly as laws and regulations evolve globally. Our compliance obligations include those relating to U.S. laws and regulations, including, among others, state regulations such as the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”), which provides for enhanced consumer protections for California residents, a private right of action for data breaches and statutory fines, and damages for data breaches or other California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) violations, as well as a requirement of “reasonable” cybersecurity. At the U.S. federal level, the SEC has adopted amendments to Regulation S-P that took effect in December 2025. These amendments impose operationally challenging notification requirements and deadlines and obligations to implement written policies and procedures to govern oversight of service providers that will likely increase associated compliance costs.

Added

Our compliance obligations also include those relating to foreign data collection and privacy laws, including, for example, the GDPR and U.K. Data Protection Act, as well as laws in many other jurisdictions globally, including Switzerland, Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore, India, China, Australia, Canada, and Brazil. Global laws in this area are rapidly increasing in the scale and depth of their requirements, and are also often extra-territorial in nature. In addition, a wide range of regulators and private actors are seeking to enforce these laws across regions and borders. We also frequently have privacy compliance requirements as a result of our contractual obligations with counterparties. These legal, regulatory, and contractual obligations heighten our data protection and privacy obligations in the ordinary course of conducting our business in the United States and internationally.

Added

Any inability, or perceived inability, by us or our funds’ portfolio companies to adequately address data protection or privacy concerns, or comply with applicable laws, regulations, policies, industry standards and guidance, contractual obligations, or other legal obligations, even if unfounded, could result in significant legal, regulatory, and third-party liability, increased costs, disruption of our and our funds’ portfolio companies’ business and operations, and a loss of client (including investor) confidence and other reputational damage. Many regulators have indicated an intention to take more aggressive enforcement actions regarding data privacy matters, and private litigation resulting from such matters is increasing and resulting in progressively larger judgments and settlements. In particular, the SEC’s stated examination priorities include an intended focus on adviser’s policies and procedures, internal controls, oversight of third-party vendors, and governance practices as it pertains to the safeguarding of customer records. Moreover, as new data protection and privacy-related laws and regulations are implemented, the time and resources needed for us and our funds’ portfolio companies to comply with such laws and regulations continues to increase and become a significant compliance workstream.

Reworded

In recent years, the financial services industry has been the subject of heightened scrutiny, which is expected to continue to increase, and the SEC has specifically focused on private equity and the private funds industry. In this respect, the SEC’s stated examination priorities and published observations from recent examinations have included, among other things, private equity firms’ collection of fees and allocation of expenses, their marketing and valuation practices, allocation of investment opportunities, investor side letter terms, consistency of firms’ practices with disclosures, handling of material non-public information and insider trading, disclosures of investment risk, conflicts of interest, adherence to notice, consent and other contractual requirements regarding limited partnership advisory committeescommittees, fiduciary standards of conduct, financial technologies, and compliance policies, and procedures with respect to conflicts of interest. Thethe SEC’s stated examination priorities also have included investment advisers’ and funds’ compliance with recently adopted rules, including those referenced herein. Statements by SEC staff in 2024 and the SEC’s enforcement and rulemaking activities reflected a focus on certain of these topics and on bolstering transparency in the private funds industry, including with respect to fees earned and expenses charged by advisers.

Removed

In addition, the SEC has proposed and, in some instances, adopted a number of rules related to private funds and private fund advisors that impact our business and operations. Many of these rules have faced legal challenges, and the future of several proposed rules is uncertain given the new administration. For example, on June 5, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated rules and amendments to existing rules under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, which were adopted by the SEC in August 2023 (collectively, the “Private Fund Adviser Rules”). The SEC did not seek reconsideration of the Fifth Circuit’s June ruling by the July 24, 2024 deadline, and the future of the Private Fund Adviser Rules is in doubt.

Reworded

Moreover,In addition, the SEC has proposed and, in some instances, adopted a number of rules related to private funds and private fund advisors that impact our business and operations. For example, the SEC (in May 2023) and the SEC and CFTC jointly (in February 2024) adopted changes to Form PF, a confidential form relating to reporting by private fund advisers and intended to be used by the Financial Stability Oversight Counsel (“FSOC”) for systemic risk oversight purposes, that expand existing reporting obligations. Such increased obligations may increase our costs, including if we are required to spend more time, hire additional personnel, or buy new technology to comply effectively.

Showing the first 60 of 399 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

82new paragraphs
75removed paragraphs
123reworded paragraphs
27,884 → 26,735words in section

New heading “Senior Note Issuance”

New heading “Share Repurchase Program”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: china, russia, ukraine, inflation
“In Europe, there is a push for greater strategic autonomy that can only be achieved through a substantial increase in the domestic development and production of defense technologies and systems. Early signs of these efforts have started to become visible through improvement in broader economic data, supported by a notable pickup in factory output that seems to be tied to defense-related orders. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: litigation, securities and exchange commission, climate
“The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) has put forth several rule proposals, and we are evaluating the potential impacts to our business and operations and those of our portfolio companies. The future of several final rules, such as the public company climate-related disclosure rules and the private fund adviser rules, is in doubt pending the resolution of recent litigation. We are closely evaluating potential impacts to our business of rule proposals and adoptions and various financial, regulatory, and other proposals put forth by the new administration and Congress. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: china, inflation, interest rate
“While global monetary policy generally eased in 2024, the opposite was true for Japan. The Bank of Japan (“BoJ”) ended its negative interest rate regime in 2024 and outlined a plan to taper its asset purchases, a pivotal shift from its decade-long stimulus program. Through January 2025, the BoJ has raised its policy rate three times to a current level of 0.5%, its highest since 2008, as annual inflation remains elevated relative to target. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: russia, ukraine, pandemic
“dollar and euro base rates will widen to more than 200 basis points over the next year, suggesting there is potential for the euro to break through parity with the dollar. Euro area GDP grew at just a 0.2% annualized rate during the fourth quarter, though underlying performance across member states has diverged. Germany, the region’s largest economy, continues to bear the brunt of the energy supply shock caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: impairment, restructuring
“Principal investment income. The decrease in Principal investment income for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to 2024 was primarily attributable to an impairment charge of $92.5 million and a $38.0 million reduction in NGP accrued carry, both related to the restructuring of the terms of our strategic investment in NGP (see Note 4, Investments, for more information), and investment losses from our CLOs in 2025 compared to gains in 2024. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: default
“Credit markets remained resilient in 2025, with demand supported by record fundraising in the CLO market, and an uptick in new supply from robust M&A activity, dividend recaps, and refinancing. While U.S. institutional loan activity fell in the fourth quarter, 2025 was still the second-busiest year on record with total activity over $1 trillion. European leveraged loan volume increased 21% over 2024, driven by a wave of repricing on the back of more favorable financing conditions. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (280)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 43 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

We are one of the world’s largest global investment firms thatand deploysdeploy private capital across itsour business,business. and weWe conduct our operations through three reportable segments: Global Private Equity, Global Credit, and Carlyle AlpInvest (formerly, Global Investment Solutions.Solutions).

Reworded

•Global Private Equity — Our Global Private Equity segment advises our buyout, middlegrowth, market,real estate, and growth capital funds, our U.S. and internationally focused real estate funds, and our infrastructure and& natural resources funds. The segment also includes the NGP Carry Funds advised by NGP. As of December 31, 2024, our Global Private Equity segment had $163.5 billion in AUM and $98.0 billion in Fee-earning AUM.

Added

As of December 31, 2025, our Global Private Equity segment had $163.5 billion in AUM and $101.4 billion in Fee-earning AUM.

Reworded

•Global Credit — Our Global Credit segment advises funds and vehicles that pursue investment strategies including insurance solutions, liquid credit, opportunistic credit, direct lending, asset-backed finance, aviation finance, infrastructure credit, cross-platform credit products, and global capital markets. As of December 31, 2024,2025, our Global Credit segment had $192.4$211.3 billion in AUM and $154.2$169.5 billion in Fee-earning AUM.

Reworded

•GlobalCarlyle InvestmentAlpInvest Solutions— Our GlobalCarlyle Investment SolutionsAlpInvest segment advises global private equity programs that pursue secondary purchases and relatedfinancing of existing portfolios, managed co-investment programs, and secondaryprimary activities.fund investments. As of December 31, 2024,2025, our GlobalCarlyle Investment SolutionsAlpInvest segment had $85.1$102.0 billion in AUM and $52.1$66.0 billion in Fee-earning AUM.

Added

Equity markets closed out 2025 at or near new all-time highs, with major indices across the United States, Europe, and Japan setting new records in the fourth quarter. In Europe, the Euro Stoxx 50 rose 5% to end the year 18% higher, while the Nikkei rose 12% in the quarter to tally more than 26% for the year, firmly surpassing the 1989 peak that took nearly 35 years to regain. Returns in the United States decelerated from a strong third quarter with the S&P 500 gaining 2.3% for the fourth quarter and 16% for the year, marking the first time in 20 years that the S&P 500 was the worst performing major equity index.

Added

While continued economic growth and a resolution to the U.S. government shutdown helped support momentum across many sectors, concerns regarding an “AI bubble” intensified in November and dragged down many of the largest technology companies in the last two months of the year. The “Magnificent 7,” which generated annualized returns of 29% over the last five years and represented over half of the S&P 500’s gains from 2021 through their peak on October 29, 2025, have declined 7% from their top (as of February 24, 2026), offsetting gains in the rest of the index. By contrast, cyclical, value, and quality factors have strengthened since the start of the year; after a period of large-cap growth dominance, more reasonably priced value stocks have outperformed by over 600 basis points (“bps”) year-to-date in 2026. Public equity markets overall have been volatile in recent weeks; individual stocks have experienced large price swings in apparent response to headlines, new AI product offerings, and “viral” research reports. The software sector in particular has sold off on “AI disruption” fears and is down 33% year-to-date through February 24, 2026. Meanwhile, the public-private market valuation gap widened to its largest level in at least a decade in 2025, as buyout purchase multiples in the United States fell to 11.2x earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (“EBITDA”), while public market valuations rose to 17.7x EBITDA, about half a turn below their 2021 peak of 18.2x EBITDA. Importantly, this valuation differential is not a reflection of underlying performance. Every year since 2019, including the twelve months ended September 30, 2025, which represents the most recent private markets data, the median buyout company has matched or beaten the revenue and EBITDA growth rates of the median company in the S&P 500.

Added

While headline U.S. GDP growth of 1.4% disappointed in the fourth quarter, real underlying demand as proxied by real final sales to private domestic purchasers (which strips out effects from trade, inventories, and government spending) was more resilient and expanded at a 2.4% annualized rate. Business spending remained a key contributing factor; our proprietary portfolio data indicate technology spending growth ended the year at a record 30% annualized rate. Consistent with prior quarters, much of this momentum remains concentrated in AI-related investment, particularly data centers, where hardware shipments are 7.5x higher than 2021 levels and capital expenditures continue to grow rapidly from a much larger base. While many observers focus on the economy’s “dependence” on the surge in AI-related capex, there are increasing signs that it is “crowding out” other forms of real estate development as data centers consume a larger share of the finite supply of investible capital. For other real estate sectors, capital is increasingly scarce, setting the stage for strategies focused elsewhere, such as our own real estate funds, to find greater opportunities to generate higher relative returns. Despite a constructive macro backdrop, our portfolio data suggest U.S. labor market momentum has softened further as the deceleration in payroll employment growth now appears to exceed what could be explained by the labor-supply shock from immigration enforcement. Some hiring weakness appears tied to corporate AI-integration efforts, as companies reassess workflows and pursue efficiencies to create financial capacity for incremental tech-enabled services spending. Recent statements from the Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”), however, suggest that they are no longer as concerned with the labor market as they were in the fourth quarter of 2025, and feel comfortable with the current policy rate. Given the Federal Reserve’s historically dovish bias, continued cooling in employment and inflation indicators could increase the likelihood of additional easing down the road, despite core Personal Consumption Expenditures (“PCE”) inflation that remains near the 3% levels that have maintained for the better part of two years.

Added

In Europe, there is a push for greater strategic autonomy that can only be achieved through a substantial increase in the domestic development and production of defense technologies and systems. Early signs of these efforts have started to become visible through improvement in broader economic data, supported by a notable pickup in factory output that seems to be tied to defense-related orders. Germany has also been part of that improvement, though energy-intensive industrial production remains roughly 20% below levels seen prior to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and momentum may hinge on how quickly Berlin can translate public investment plans into executed spending. Federal investment in Germany rose 17% in 2025 to €87 billion, though still came in nearly €29 billion below the original budget. In China, the key story continues to be the divergence between household consumption and industrial output: retail sales grew just 0.9% in December 2025 from a year earlier, the slowest pace since 2022, while industrial output grew by over 5%, contributing to a record $1.2 trillion trade surplus for the year. In India, our data suggest domestic demand grew at its fastest pace in over two years, supported by the Goods and Services Tax reform and low inflation that continues to support real household incomes. In Japan, recent moves in the yen and Japan 10-year government bond yields have fueled concerns of fiscal sustainability and the risk of a sovereign debt or currency crisis. However, these concerns overlook key attributes of the Japanese economy. Nominal per capita GDP has grown at an annualized rate of nearly 3% over the past five years, and public net debt looks manageable, particularly when viewed through the lens of substantial broader economy-wide savings. The normalization of rates appears to be more consistent with an economy exiting its deflationary slump than of one in crisis. Japanese policymakers want this process to unfold gradually while preserving the benefits of a competitive exchange rate. Given recent election outcomes, Japan’s new leadership may also be able to move faster on its stated plans to increase defense spending and potentially ease restrictions on weapons sales to allies and partners. These shifts could create capital deployment opportunities surrounding increased defense expenditure.

Added

Additionally, tax reform could provide a near-term boost to growth by increasing disposable income for households and supporting domestic demand.

Added

Global mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”) activity was very strong in 2025, with total volume of $5.1 trillion, a notable 44% increase over 2024 and the highest annual volume since 2021. The fourth quarter was the busiest of the year, with over $1.5 trillion in transactions, up 19% from the prior quarter, and 57% from a year ago. However, headline volumes were boosted by a shift toward larger deals. In 2025, average deal size was $125 million, a nearly 50% increase over 2024 and a 40% increase over the average size in the preceding five years (2020 through 2024). Buyout activity rose at a similar pace. Globally, financial sponsors announced $657 billion in buyout transactions in 2025, roughly 48% higher than 2024, with U.S.-target deals accounting for nearly 60% of global volume amid a surge in large transactions. In the fourth quarter, general partners announced $155 billion in global leveraged buyouts, nearly 50% higher than a year earlier, though underlying deal counts remained subdued at 420 deals, and the top 10 deals represented 53% of quarterly volume. Despite blockbuster deal volumes, buyout exits remained slow. Aggregate exit volumes of $116 billion in the fourth quarter of 2025 were roughly flat to the third quarter and were 18% lower than the fourth quarter of 2024; only 410 companies were fully divested globally, the lowest quarterly exit count since the fourth quarter of 2022. However, the initial public offering (“IPO”) market gained momentum throughout the year. In the fourth quarter, 21 U.S. exchange-listed IPOs raised $12.9 billion, a pullback in comparison to a very strong third quarter but still the second-best quarter by dollar amount since the fourth quarter of 2021. Activity remained concentrated in certain sectors: software and pharma/healthcare accounted for nearly 60% of deals and roughly 80% of proceeds. Notably, Medline alone represented 55% of total proceeds in the fourth quarter. In total, there were 93 U.S.-exchange listed IPOs over full-year 2025, with proceeds totaling $43.4 billion, an increase of 21% and 84% in transaction and volume terms, respectively, over 2024.

Added

Credit markets remained resilient in 2025, with demand supported by record fundraising in the CLO market, and an uptick in new supply from robust M&A activity, dividend recaps, and refinancing. While U.S. institutional loan activity fell in the fourth quarter, 2025 was still the second-busiest year on record with total activity over $1 trillion. European leveraged loan volume increased 21% over 2024, driven by a wave of repricing on the back of more favorable financing conditions. Spreads continued to compress, with direct lending deals pricing at 510bps and 521bps in the United States and Europe, respectively, and syndicated markets pricing well below 400bps in both regions. Risks appear to be muted, as defaults plus distressed exchanges in the leveraged loan market fell by more than a percentage point over the fourth quarter to end the year at just a 3.35% rate; private credit defaults remained below 2% as of the third quarter of 2025 (the latest quarter for which data are available).

Removed

The year 2024 was marked by the initiation of a broad global monetary policy easing cycle against a backdrop of stable growth. Amid more favorable financing conditions, global mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”) activity recovered modestly, though exit conditions remained challenging as market participants exercised patience in anticipation of future rate cuts and lower borrowing costs. Entering 2025, as the inflation and growth outlook for the U.S. has grown more complex, the expectation of near-term rate cuts and lower borrowing costs has dissipated, which we expect will in turn facilitate greater deal activity. Globally, central banks’ policy paths appear likely to be far less synchronized than during the recent simultaneous tightening cycle. Central banks in most other developed markets (with Japan a notable exception) have room to further cut rates as inflation risks diminish and economic weakness persists, which could in turn put more upward pressure on the U.S. dollar.

Removed

At its last meeting of 2024, the Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) reduced the federal funds rate by 25 basis points, marking the third consecutive cut of the year and bringing cumulative 2024 reductions to 100 basis points. However, the Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation gauge, the core PCE Price Index, ended the year up 2.8% year-over-year, reflecting a lack of further downward inflation progress in recent months. While outright reinflation has not yet materialized, strong economic data, inflation readings persistently above target, and easy financial conditions have raised questions about whether current interest rate policy remains as restrictive as Federal Reserve officials suggest. The FOMC opted to pause further rate reductions at its January 2025 meeting. Futures have now priced in just one to two additional cuts in 2025, down from expectations for six as recently as September 2024. Notably, 10-year Treasury yields have risen rapidly since the first interest rate cut in September, a phenomenon that is without precedent across the seven prior easing cycles. Though attributed by many to potential changes in trade, immigration, and fiscal policy, this may also reflect the market’s realization that base rates may not currently be as restrictive as previously thought.

Removed

The economy grew at an estimated 2.3% annualized rate in the fourth quarter of 2024 and averaged 2.8% over the year, despite higher levels of interest rates. Overall, U.S. economic growth has outperformed relative to consensus expectations over the past two years. This has been driven by government spending and large fiscal deficits, resilient household consumption, supported by the prevalence of fixed-rate liabilities that have insulated disposable income from higher borrowing costs, and, most significantly, by a generational boom in industrial fixed investment tied to AI spend and the energy transition.

Removed

This marked increase in capital expenditures has been led by companies known as “hyperscalers” (Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, and Microsoft), and highlights a level of continued concentration risk to both U.S. economic growth and equity performance.

Removed

Any pullback in spending or shift in AI strategy could have notable negative implications for the broader U.S. macro-outlook.

Removed

While U.S. economic growth has consistently surprised to the upside and the inflation outlook has grown more uncertain, euro area growth has by contrast struggled, and the European Central Bank’s (“ECB”) inflation target is now within reach. The ECB delivered two additional 25 basis point cuts to its deposit rate during the fourth quarter of 2024, following two cuts earlier in the year, and another 25 basis point cut in January 2025. Forward interest rates imply that the gap between U.S.

Removed

dollar and euro base rates will widen to more than 200 basis points over the next year, suggesting there is potential for the euro to break through parity with the dollar. Euro area GDP grew at just a 0.2% annualized rate during the fourth quarter, though underlying performance across member states has diverged. Germany, the region’s largest economy, continues to bear the brunt of the energy supply shock caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. German energy-intensive manufacturing output has fallen 20% below pre-invasion levels and the manufacturing job market there is now weaker than at any time since tracking began in 2002 outside of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Growth in Spain, by contrast, has been a relative bright spot and is projected to have grown 3.2% in 2024, over four times the eurozone average, boosted by strong tourism flows and services exports. Outside of the euro area, the UK economy also expanded sluggishly, growing at a 0.4% annualized rate in the fourth quarter. The Bank of England’s policy outlook is complicated by persistent price pressures in the context of this slower growth.

Removed

While global monetary policy generally eased in 2024, the opposite was true for Japan. The Bank of Japan (“BoJ”) ended its negative interest rate regime in 2024 and outlined a plan to taper its asset purchases, a pivotal shift from its decade-long stimulus program. Through January 2025, the BoJ has raised its policy rate three times to a current level of 0.5%, its highest since 2008, as annual inflation remains elevated relative to target. Although Japan experienced a contraction in the first quarter of 2024, its economy has since gained momentum with three consecutive quarters of growth supported by both domestic demand and strong semiconductor and electronics output. Against this backdrop, it seems likely that the BoJ will raise rates again by June 2025. In India, economic growth slowed through 2024, prompting the Reserve Bank of India to cut its benchmark interest rate by 25 basis points to 6.25%—its first reduction in five years—as policymakers sought to support weakening consumption and investment even as inflation pressures remained elevated. In China, underlying growth was uneven as policymakers implemented targeted measures to stabilize property markets and boost domestic demand amid the country’s transition to a sustainable growth model centered on high-value industries such as semiconductors, batteries, and electric vehicles (EVs).

Removed

Earnings are estimated to have grown by 16.9% in the fourth quarter of 2024 compared to the same period a year ago, led by the financials, communication services, and consumer discretionary sectors. The estimated blended net profit margin for the fourth quarter of 2024 was reported at 12.5%, nearly a full percentage point higher than the 11.3% margin observed a year earlier.

Removed

The new U.S. administration has introduced aggressive and unpredictable trade policies and has imposed or threatened to impose tariffs on goods, materials, inputs, and intermediate parts with numerous U.S. trade partners. The tariffs proposed to date, if enacted in full, would amount to a tax increase roughly equivalent to 1% of GDP, a shock large enough to have negative implications for broader growth. Analysts do not appear to have factored this risk into their estimates so far, and currently expect results for full-year 2025 to not only meet but exceed those for 2024, with earnings growth for companies in the S&P 500 projected to be nearly 13%, compared to 10% in 2024. These optimistic projections suggest potential downside risk to equities in 2025 in the event that actual results disappoint relative to estimates. Within our portfolio, the majority of our Global Private Equity segment is either domestically focused or services- rather than goods-oriented, which we believe mitigates exposure to tariff risk. However, we continue to closely monitor shifts in global trade policy and evaluate their potential impacts.

Removed

Global financial markets generally performed well in 2024. The S&P 500 returned 23%, nearly matching its performance in 2023. For a second consecutive year, returns in the U.S. were driven by a small number of mega-cap tech stocks (known as the “Magnificent Seven”). These stocks accounted for over half of the S&P 500’s annual return and made up an astounding 34% of the index’s market cap by the end of December. Excluding the Magnificent Seven, the “S&P 493” returned 11% in 2024. Notably, since the market bottom in October 2022, value-weighted returns across the U.S. equity market have outpaced equal-weighted returns by over 20 percentage points on an annualized basis. In 2024, the broad U.S. equity market returned 8% on an equal-weighted basis. This represents a significant divergence from historical norms, as value-weighted and equal-weighted performance were roughly comparable over the previous decade. The reliance of U.S. equity outperformance on a small pool of mega-cap tech stocks and the dichotomy of value-weighted versus equal-weighted returns both complicates the effort to benchmark returns in the private markets and highlights the concentration risk of public equity performance in 2025.

Removed

Equities elsewhere lagged U.S. performance in 2024 but still produced positive returns and were comparable to the U.S. results excluding the Magnificent Seven. In euro terms, the Euro Stoxx 50 rose 8.3% over the year, but was nearly flat (+1.3%) in dollar terms, largely due to rapid euro depreciation that started in the fourth quarter and accelerated in the aftermath of the U.S. election. This combination of significantly cheaper valuations relative to U.S. equities (forward ratios are nearly 40% lower) and the historically weak euro have brought investors back to the market: year-to-date through February 11, 2025, the Euro Stoxx 50 is up nearly 10% compared to just 3% for the S&P 500. Japan’s Nikkei 225 and China’s Shanghai Composite returned 19% and 12%, respectively, in 2024, while the MSCI World Index closed the year up 17% despite a weaker fourth quarter. This robust full-year performance across indexes masks interim volatility during the year, the most notable of which was the selloff in the third quarter associated with the monetary policy-driven disruption to the yen carry trade. As demonstrated by full-year returns, equities recovered relatively quickly, although the Nikkei 225 remains 5.5% below its July 11th peak as of year-end 2024. A stronger yen in 2025 due to narrowing interest rate differentials with the U.S. could put downward pressure on Japanese equities.

Removed

Credit spreads across both leveraged loans and high yield bonds compressed to post-2008 lows in 2024 as strong demand, particularly from collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”), continued to outpace supply. Historically tight credit spreads drove a surge in refinancing activity, pushing total global leveraged finance issuance in 2024 to nearly $1.2 trillion, up 92% from 2023 and one of the highest years on record. In the U.S., leveraged loan issuance doubled to $654 billion, the highest total outside of the 2021 pandemic-era boom, with about half used for refinancing. Non-refinancing issuance also rebounded in 2024: in the U.S., total M&A-related leveraged loan volumes for the year (including pro-rata transactions) were 95% higher than in 2023, led by a more than 200% increase in volume tied to leveraged buyout (“LBO”) activity. In Europe, leveraged loan issuance rose 130% to $117 billion, returning to pre-pandemic averages.

Removed

Against this backdrop of relatively favorable financing conditions, global M&A activity recovered modestly, totaling $3.5 trillion in 2024, a 12% increase over 2023 but still 11% lower than the yearly average from 2015 through 2019 and 41% below the $6 trillion surge in 2021. Europe led the recovery, with deal volume rising 15% to $884 billion, though momentum softened in the second half. U.S. M&A volume reached $1.6 trillion, an 8% increase, while Asia-Pacific transactions totaled $858 billion, a 12% increase, with deal activity accelerating in the second half of the year. Buyout activity also rebounded, with financial sponsors announcing $448 billion in buyout transactions, a 35% increase over 2023. Including add-ons, total deal volume reached $520 billion, up 27% year-over-year and roughly in line with historical averages from 2015 through 2019. U.S.

Removed

targets accounted for 42% of global buyout volume, while Europe represented 37%. Despite more robust deal activity, exit conditions remained challenging, with buyout-backed exits rising just 6% from 2023, while total deal value fell by 12% as deal sizes declined on average. However, the IPO market showed early signs of recovery, with 168 U.S.-listed IPOs raising $32 billion, a 60% increase in proceeds and a 44% rise in transaction count compared to 2023.

Reworded

Our carry fund portfolio appreciated 8% during 2024.2025. Within our Global Private Equity segment, our corporate private equity funds appreciated 8%,7%, with particular strength in our two latest vintage U.S. buyout and Japan buyout funds, which appreciated 15%17% and 21%,33%, respectively, during the year, outpacingand growthour latest Europe technology fund, which appreciated 20% during the year. As a result, the net accrued performance revenues in theour S&Pcorporate 493.private equity strategy increased. Our infrastructure and natural resources funds appreciated 8%,17%, and our real estate funds appreciated 5%.3%. Our Global Credit carry funds (which represent approximately 11% of the total Global Credit remaining fair value as of December 31, 20242025) appreciated 12%16% in 20242025 and carry funds in our GlobalCarlyle Investment SolutionsAlpInvest segment appreciated 9%.6%.

Reworded

ActivityIn contrast to the muted transaction volumes in the broader market, activity across our platform in 20242025 reflectedpicked theup reboundsignificantly inrelative globalto deal activity during the year over depressed 2023 levels. During the year ended December 31, 2024, our net transaction and portfolio advisory fees of $152.5 million more than doubled from $68.6 million last year, driven by significant activity in our capital markets business.2024. We generated $28.6$34.1 billion in realized proceeds from our carry funds,funds in 2025, an increase of 19% from the prior year. We also continued to successfully execute public offerings during the year, including $12.4the billionIPO fromof our corporate private equity fundsMedline, which nearlywas doubledthe fromlargest $6.5public billionoffering inof realized proceeds in 2023.2025. We deployed $42.7$54.5 billion across our platform during 2024,2025, a nearlymore 50%than 25% increase comparedover to $28.8 billion in 2023,2024, which included $8.2$10.4 billion and $10.0$14.2 billion in invested capital in our Global Private Equity and GlobalCarlyle InvestmentAlpInvest Solutionssegments, segments.respectively. In our Global Credit segment, deployment of $24.5$29.9 billion in 20242025 included the closing of tennine new CLOs, and gross originations across our platform including $3.7$5.1 billion in our direct lending,lending andstrategy, investedwhich capitalhad inits ourhighest carry funds. Over one-thirdquarter of our realized proceeds in 2024 were generatedoriginations in the fourth quarter,quarter reflectingof 2025. In connection with the accelerationincrease in deal activity, our net transaction and portfolio advisory fees of deal$206.0 activitymillion for the year increased 35% from $152.5 million in the latter part of the year.2024.

Added

We had $53.7 billion in capital inflows in 2025, an increase of 32% from 2024. Inflows during the year included over $7 billion in our evergreen wealth products, contributing to a near doubling of assets under management year-over-year in this area of strategic focus. We also completed fundraising on our largest secondaries fund in Carlyle AlpInvest during 2025, which reflects the demand for secondary solutions as investors seek liquidity and portfolio optimization strategies. With $88 billion of available capital across our three business segments, we are well-positioned to deploy capital across our global investment platform.

Removed

We had $40.8 billion in capital inflows in 2024, exceeding our previously announced target of $40 billion, with Global Credit and Global Investment Solutions comprising over two-thirds of the activity. While we believe that we will continue to attract a significant amount of capital for our buyout funds, we have seen a decline in buyout fund sizes across most geographies, which may continue to result in lower management fees in Global Private Equity in the future.

Removed

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) has put forth several rule proposals, and we are evaluating the potential impacts to our business and operations and those of our portfolio companies. The future of several final rules, such as the public company climate-related disclosure rules and the private fund adviser rules, is in doubt pending the resolution of recent litigation. We are closely evaluating potential impacts to our business of rule proposals and adoptions and various financial, regulatory, and other proposals put forth by the new administration and Congress. The potential for policy changes may create regulatory uncertainty for our investment strategies and our portfolio companies and could adversely affect our profitability and the profitability of our portfolio companies.

Reworded

RecentNotable Developments

Reworded

In February 2025,2026, the Company’sour Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share to common stockholders of record at the close of business on February 21,16, 2025,2026, payable on February 28,20, 2025.2026.

Added

Senior Note Issuance

Added

In September 2025, we issued $800.0 million of 5.050% senior notes due 2035. For further information, see Note 6, Borrowings, to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Added

Share Repurchase Program

Added

Our Board of Directors reset the total repurchase authorization to $2.0 billion in shares of our common stock, effective as of February 26, 2026. Under the share repurchase program, shares of our common stock may be repurchased from time to time in open market transactions, in privately negotiated transactions, or otherwise, including through Rule 10b5-1 plans. The timing and actual number of shares of common stock repurchased will depend on a variety of factors, including legal requirements and price, economic, and market conditions. In addition to the repurchase of common stock, the share repurchase program is used for the payment of tax withholding amounts upon net share settlement of equity-based awards granted pursuant to our Equity Incentive Plan or otherwise based on the value of shares withheld that would have otherwise been issued to the award holder. The repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time and does not have a specified expiration date.

Reworded

Revenues primarily consist of Fund management fees, Incentive fees, Investment income (including Performance allocations, realized and unrealized gains of our investments in our fundsfunds, and other principal investments), as well as Interest and other income.

Reworded

Incentive fees. Incentive fees consist of performance-based incentive arrangements pursuant to management contracts, primarily from certain of our Global Credit funds,contracts when the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets. In such arrangements, incentive fees are recognized when the performance benchmark has been achieved.

Reworded

Additionally, unrealized performance allocations reverse when performance allocations are realized, and unrealized performance allocations can be negative if the amount of realized performance allocations exceed total performance allocations generated in the period. The timing and receipt of realized performance allocations varies with the lifecycle of our carry funds and there is often a difference between the time we start accruing performance allocations and realization. The timing of performance allocationsallocation realizations from our GlobalCarlyle Investment Solutions,AlpInvest, Carlyle Aviation, and Abingworth funds is typically later than in our other carry funds based on the terms of such arrangements.

Reworded

Under our arrangements with the historical owners and management teams of AlpInvest and Abingworth, the amount of carried interest to which we are entitled varies. In some cases, we are entitled to 15% of the carried interest in respect of commitments from the historical owners of AlpInvest for the period between 2011 and 2020. In certain instances, carried interest associated with the AlpInvest fund vehicles is subject to entity level income taxes in the Netherlands. Additionally, in connection with the acquisition of Abingworth, we are entitled to 15% of carried interest generated from certain Abingworth Realized carried interest may be clawed back or given back to the fund if the fund’s investment values decline below certain return hurdles, which vary from fund to fund. This amount is known as the “giveback obligation.” In all cases, each investment fund is considered separately in evaluating carried interest and potential giveback obligations. See Note 8, Commitments and Contingencies, to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10- K for additional information.funds.

Added

Realized carried interest may be clawed back or given back to the fund if the fund’s investment values decline below certain return hurdles, which vary from fund to fund. This amount is known as the “giveback obligation.” In all cases, each investment fund is considered separately in evaluating carried interest and potential giveback obligations. See Note 8, Commitments and Contingencies, to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10- K for additional information.

Reworded

Accrued performance allocations and accrued giveback obligations at a point in time assume a hypothetical liquidation of the funds’ investments at their then current fair values. Each investment fund is considered separately in evaluating carried interest and potential giveback obligations. These assets and liabilities will continue to fluctuate in accordance with the fair values of the funds’ investments until they are realized. The Company uses “net accrued performance revenues” to refer to the aggregation of the accrued performance allocations net of (i) accrued giveback obligations, (ii) accrued performance allocations related compensation, (iii) performance allocations related tax obligations, and (iv) accrued performance allocations attributable to non-controlling interests. Net accrued performance revenues exclude any net accrued performance allocations and incentive fees that have been realized but will be collected in subsequent periods, as well as net accrued performance revenues which are presented as fee related performance revenues when realized in our non-GAAP financial measures. Realized performance allocation-related compensation associated with our updated compensation program that has not yet been paid is also excluded from our net accrued performance allocations.

Reworded

Investment income also represents the realized and unrealized gains and losses on our principal investments, including our investments in Carlyle funds that are not consolidated, and our strategic investments in NGP as described below. Realized principal investment income (loss) is recorded when we redeem all or a portion of our investment or when we receive or are due cash income, such as dividends or distributions. A realized principal investment loss is also recorded when an investment is deemed to be permanently impaired or worthless. Unrealized principal investment income (loss) results from changes in the fair value of the underlying investment, as well as the reversal of previously recognized unrealized gains (losses) at the time an investment is realized.

Added

We account for our investments in NGP under the equity method of accounting. Our investments in NGP include the equity interests in NGP Management and the general partners of certain carry funds advised by NGP. Following the restructuring of the terms of our strategic investment in NGP in March 2025 (the “Restructuring”), our equity interests in NGP Management entitle us to an allocation of income equal to 55.0% of the management fee related revenues earned by NGP Management for existing funds, and up to 55.0% for all NGP funds that held an initial closing after December 31, 2024, including all management fees being retained by NGP for the years 2025 through 2028 on such future NGP funds. Our investment in the general partners of the NGP Carry Funds entitle us to up to 47.5% of the performance allocations received from NGP fund general partners. For further information regarding our strategic investments in NGP and the Restructuring, refer to Note 4, Investments, to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Removed

We account for our investments in NGP under the equity method of accounting. Our investments in NGP include the equity interests in NGP Management Company, L.L.C. (“NGP Management”) and the general partners of certain carry funds advised by NGP. These interests entitle us to an allocation of income equal to 55.0% of the management fee related revenues of NGP Management, which serves as the investment advisor to certain NGP funds, as well as 47.5% (40.0% or 42.75% in the case of certain funds) of the performance allocations that NGP receives from the NGP Carry Funds. We record investment income (loss) for our equity income allocation from NGP management fee related revenues and our share of any allocated expenses from NGP Management, as well as expenses associated with the compensatory elements of the strategic investment.

Reworded

We record investment income (loss) for our equity income allocation from NGP management fee related revenues and our share of any allocated expenses from NGP Management, as well as expenses associated with the compensatory elements of the strategic investment and any impairment charges. We also record our equity income allocation from NGP performance allocations in principal investment income (loss) from equity method investments rather than performance allocations in our consolidated statements of operations. We do not control or manage NGP. Moreover, we do not operate NGP’s business, have representation on NGP’s board or serve as an investment advisor to any investment fund sponsored by NGP, nor do we direct the operations of any of NGPNGP’s portfolio companies. While we have consent rights over certain major actions by NGP outside of the ordinary course of NGP’s business (including, for example, consent rights over items such as amendments to the organizational documents of the entity in which we are invested, changes to the management fee streams earned by NGP under its fund agreements, or the incurrence of certain debt by NGP and other similar items), we have no voting rights or consent rights on any NGP investment committee that selects investments to be made by NGP funds. For further information regarding our strategic investments in NGP, refer to Note 4, Investments, to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Reworded

Net investment income (loss) of Consolidated Funds. Net investment income (loss) of Consolidated Funds generally measures the change in the difference in fair value between the assets and the liabilities of the Consolidated Funds. Income (loss) indicates that the fair value of the assets of the Consolidated Funds appreciated more (less), or depreciated less (more), than the fair value of the liabilities of the Consolidated Funds. Income or loss is not necessarily indicative of the investment performance of the Consolidated Funds and does not impact the management or incentive fees received by Carlyle for its management of the Consolidated Funds. The portion of the net investment income (losses) of Consolidated Funds attributable to the limited partner investors is allocated to non-controlling interests. Therefore, income or loss is not expected to have a material impact on the revenues or profitability of the Company.Company beyond the Company’s capital invested in the Consolidated Funds. Moreover, although the assets of the Consolidated Funds are consolidated onto our balance sheet pursuant to U.S. GAAP, ultimately we do not have recourse to such assets and such liabilities are generally non-recourse to us. Therefore, income or loss from the Consolidated Funds generally does not impact the assets available to our common stockholders.

Reworded

We recognize as compensation expense the portion of performance allocations and incentive fees that are due to our employees, senior Carlyle professionals, advisors, and operating executives in a manner consistent with how we recognize the performance allocations and incentive fee revenue. These amounts are accounted for as compensation expense in conjunction with the related performance allocations and incentive fee revenue and, until paid, are recognized as a component of the accrued compensation and benefits liability. Compensation in respect of performance allocations and incentive fees is paid when the related performance allocations and incentive fees are realized, and not when such performance allocations and incentive fees are accrued. The funds do not have a uniform allocation of performance allocations and incentive fees to our employees, senior Carlyle professionals, advisors, and operating executives. However, subsequent to the updates made to our compensation strategy effective December 31, 2023, we generally allocate a range of 60% to 70% of performance allocations and incentive fees to our employees. As a result, the portion of performance allocations and incentive fees paid as compensation has increased and cash-based compensation and benefits has decreased in 2024 compared to the prior period.

Reworded

GAAP in that it includes certain tax expenses associated with certain foreign performance revenues (composed of performance allocations and incentive fees), and does not include unrealized performance allocations and related compensation expense, unrealized principal investment income, equity-based compensation expense, net income (loss) attributable to non-Carlyle interest in consolidated entities, or charges (credits) related to Carlyle corporate actions and non-recurring items that affect period-to-period comparability and are not reflective of the Company’s operational performance. Charges (credits) related to Carlyle corporate actions and non-recurring items include: charges associated with the Conversion, charges associated with acquisitions, dispositions, or strategic investments, changes in the tax receivable agreement liability, amortization and any impairment charges associated with acquired intangible assets, transaction costs associated with acquisitions and dispositions, charges associated with earn-outs and contingent consideration including gains and losses associated with the estimated fair value of contingent consideration issued in conjunction with acquisitions or strategic investments, impairment charges associated with lease right-of-use assets, gains and losses from the retirement of debt, charges associated with contract terminations and employee severance, and certain general, administrative and other expenses when the timing of any future payment is uncertain, and non-recurring items that affect period-to-period comparability and are not reflective of the Company’s operating performance. We believe the inclusion or exclusion of these items provides investors with a meaningful indication of our core operating performance. This measure supplements and should be considered in addition to and not in lieu of the results of operations discussed further under “—Consolidated Results of Operations” prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Removed

GAAP.

Reworded

Fee Related Earnings. Fee Related Earnings, or “FRE,” is a component of DE and is used to assess the ability of the business to cover base compensation and operating expenses from total fee revenues. FRE adjusts DE to exclude net realized performance revenues, realized principal investment income from investments in Carlyle funds, and net interest (interest income less interest expense). Fee Related Earnings includes fee related performance revenues and related compensation expense, which is generally approximately 45% of fee related performance revenues.expense. Fee related performance revenues represent the realized portion of performance revenues that are measured and received on a recurring basis, are not dependent on realization events, and which have no risk of giveback.

Reworded

(d)the external investor portion of the net asset value of certain carry funds and evergreen products (see “Fee-earning AUM based on net asset value” in the table below for the amount of this component at each period);

Reworded

(f)the gross assets (including assets acquired with leverage), of certain cross-platform credit and direct lending products, excluding cash and cash equivalents,equivalents offor one of our business development companies and certain carry funds (included in “Fee-earning AUM based on lower of cost or fair value and other” in the table below); and (g)the lower of cost or fair value of invested capital, generally for AlpInvest carry funds where the commitment fee period has expired and certain carry funds where the investment period has expired, (included in “Fee-earning AUM based on lower of cost or fair value and other” in the table below).

Reworded

(1)Inflows represents limited partner capital raised by our carry funds or separately managed accounts for which management fees based on commitments were activated during the period, the fee-earning commitments invested in vehicles for which management fees are based on invested capital, the fee-earning collateral balance of new CLO issuances, closedreinsurance reinsuranceand other transactions at Fortitude, as well as gross subscriptions in vehicles for which management fees are based on net asset value. Inflows exclude fundraising amounts during the period for which fees have not yet been activated, which are referenced as Pending Fee-earning AUM. Inflows for the year ended December 31, 2023 include $26 billion of Fee-earning AUM related to closed reinsurance transactions at Fortitude.

Reworded

(c) the net asset value of certain carry funds and evergreen products;

Reworded

(d)the fair value of Fortitude’s general account assets invested under the strategic advisory services agreement; and (e) the gross assets (including assets acquired with leverage) of ourcertain businesscross-platform developmentcredit companies,and direct lending products, plus the capital that Carlyle is entitled to call from investors in those vehicles pursuant to the terms of their capital commitments to those vehicles.

Reworded

We include in our calculation of AUM and Fee-earning AUM the NGP Energy Funds that are advised by NGP. Our calculation of AUM also includes third-party capital raised for the investment in Fortitude through a Carlyle-affiliated investment fund and from strategic investors who directly invest in Fortitude alongside the fund. The AUM and Fee-earning AUM related to the strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude isare inclusive of the net asset value of investments in Carlyle products. These amounts are also reflected in the AUM and Fee-earning AUM of the strategy in which they are invested.

Reworded

For most of our Global Private Equity and GlobalCarlyle Investment SolutionsAlpInvest carry funds, total AUM includes the fair value of the capital invested, whereas Fee-earning AUM includes the amount of capital commitments or the remaining amount of invested capital, depending on whether the original investment period for the fund has expired. As such, Fee-earning AUM may be greater than total AUM when the aggregate fair value of the remaining investments is less than the cost of those investments.

Showing the first 60 of 280 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-08-10 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-05-08 (period ending 2026-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

0new paragraphs
0removed paragraphs
0reworded paragraphs
32 → 32words in section

The section in the latest 10-Q reads in full:

For a discussion of our potential risks and uncertainties, see the information under Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual

Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.

No wording changes found in this section.

Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

74new paragraphs
68removed paragraphs
131reworded paragraphs
23,615 → 23,281words in section

New heading “Global Private Equity Structured Investment Vehicle”

New heading “Other Income (Loss)”

New heading “Income Tax Expense”

New heading “Non-controlling Interests”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: bankruptcy, default, fine, breach
“The senior revolving credit facility is unsecured. We are required to maintain management fee-earning assets (as defined in the amended and restated senior revolving credit facility) of at least $156.9 billion and a total leverage ratio of less than 4.0 to 1.0, in each case, tested on a quarterly basis. Non-compliance with any of the financial or non-financial covenants without cure or waiver would constitute an event of default under the senior revolving credit facility. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: default, covenant
“Subordinated Notes. In May and June 2021, Carlyle Finance L.L.C. issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.625% subordinated notes due May 15, 2061. The Subordinated Notes are unsecured and subordinated obligations of the issuer and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a subordinated basis, by the Company, each of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships, and CG Subsidiary Holdings L.L.C., an indirect subsidiary of the Company. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: layoff, ai, middle east
“In equity markets, investors have grown skeptical about returns to AI capex: the Magnificent 7 stocks declined 12% during the quarter, though recent layoff announcements (presumably in an effort to offset these AI-related capex costs) and soaring cloud revenues have driven a recovery rally that has more than erased the drawdown, lifting the group above its October 2025 market peak to new all-time highs (as of May 8, 2026). The quarter was also marked by distinct pre- and post-conflict market dynamics. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: ai, inflation, labor
“The U.S. economy retained underlying momentum during the quarter. The labor market did not show obvious signs of deterioration, and our measure of real final demand—a proxy for real GDP net of foreign trade and inventories—grew at a 2.7% annualized rate, a result consistent with 5.7% annual growth in S&P 1500 revenue. Business spending continued to advance at an 11.1% annualized rate, led by AI-related investment. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: inflation, interest rate, labor
“Official estimates of U.S. GDP surprised to the downside in Q2 2026, but real final demand came in right on top of the 2.2% estimate implied by our proprietary portfolio data, as a surge in AI-related capital goods imports slowed topline GDP growth relative to what would be implied by investment outlays, and inventory liquidation also reduced growth. Our measure of corporate revenue growth accelerated to 6.2% annualized in Q2 2026, up from 5.7% in Q1 2026, but price rather than volume accounted for a disproportionate share of that growth. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: liquidity, middle east
“Leveraged buyout (“LBO”) activity, however, was not as robust. GPs announced LBOs totaling $126 billion in the first quarter of 2026, a deceleration both quarter-over-quarter (-21%) and year-over-year (-3.5%). Underlying transaction counts remained relatively subdued at 434 deals, a 9% decrease from the same quarter a year ago, with the top 10 transactions accounting for nearly 70% of total deal volume. Broader market volatility also impacted buyout exits in the quarter. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (273)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 9 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

•Global Private Equity — Our Global Private Equity segment advises our buyout, growth, real estate, and infrastructure & natural resources funds. The segment also includes the NGP Carry Funds advised by NGP. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our Global Private Equity segment had $159.0$162.7 billion in AUM and $99.1$96.6 billion in Fee-earning AUM.

Reworded

•Global Credit — Our Global Credit segment advises funds and vehicles that pursue investment strategies including insurance solutions, liquid credit, opportunistic credit, direct lending, asset-backed finance, aviation finance, infrastructure credit, cross-platform credit products, and global capital markets. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our Global Credit segment had $209.5$211.1 billion in AUM and $166.4$167.6 billion in Fee-earning AUM.

Reworded

•Carlyle AlpInvest — Our Carlyle AlpInvest segment advises global private equity programs that pursue secondary purchases and financing of existing portfolios, managed co-investment programs, and primary fund investments. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our Carlyle AlpInvest segment had $106.9$111.7 billion in AUM and $67.9$70.2 billion in Fee-earning AUM.

Reworded

The following table provides a breakout of the product offerings and related acronyms included in our total assets under management of $475$485 billion as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 for each of our three global business segments (in billions):

Reworded

Note: All amounts shown represent total assets under management as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, and totals may not sum due to rounding. In addition, certain carry funds included herein may not be included in fund performance if they have not made an initial capital call or commenced investment activity.

Reworded

(2)NGP Energy funds are advised by NGP Energy Capital Management, LLC, a separately registered investment adviser. We do not serve as an investment adviser to thosethese funds.

Reworded

(5)Includes our business development companies (CGBD / CARS), Europe Direct Lending funds (EDLF / ETAC), and our evergreen fund (CDLF).

Reworded

(6)Includes our Energy Credit (CEMOF) and Real Estate Credit fund (CNLI) funds..

Added

Our global business is affected by the conditions in the global financial markets, global economies and the geopolitical landscape, particularly in the U.S., Europe, and Asia, as discussed in Item 1A “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Added

Equity markets posted their strongest quarterly returns since 2020 in Q2 2026, rising despite persistent geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz. Although a ceasefire agreement improved market sentiment, geopolitical tensions persisted, and shipping through the Strait of Hormuz remained well below pre-conflict levels, leaving physical supply constraints largely intact. The S&P 500, NASDAQ Composite, and Russell 2000 returned 14.9%, 21.4%, and 21.2%, respectively, supported by upward earnings per share (“EPS”) revisions—consensus 2026 S&P 500 EPS growth has risen 1,440 basis points (“bps”) since the onset of the Iran conflict. Rotation was a defining feature through the first half of the year: the Magnificent 7 stocks declined 10% from their peak and software stocks finished the half down 20%, while traditional economy sectors such as construction & engineering, communications equipment, and marine transport, as well as hardware, led performance, and small caps outperformed large caps by over 1,000 bps. Globally, Europe’s Euro Stoxx 50 returned 13.6% during the quarter, while Asian markets were the strongest performers—Korea’s KOSPI, Taiwan’s TAIEX, and Japan’s Nikkei returned 67.8%, 45.4%, and 37.2%, respectively, driven by semiconductor demand tied to AI infrastructure. However, record earnings from memory chip manufacturers paradoxically triggered a sharp KOSPI selloff of 25% from peak, as investors grew concerned that surging circuit board costs could impair the economics of the broader AI value chain. In private markets, buyout performance improved somewhat compared to the S&P 500 for Q1 2026 (the latest data available), but this was primarily due to quarter end volatility.

Added

Over longer periods against benchmarks that align more closely with market capitalization and display less concentration, buyouts continue to outperform. Compared to the S&P 600 small-cap index, U.S. buyouts have generated outperformance of 506 bps over the last five years, 386 bps over the last 10 years, and 310 bps over the last 15 years.

Added

Official estimates of U.S. GDP surprised to the downside in Q2 2026, but real final demand came in right on top of the 2.2% estimate implied by our proprietary portfolio data, as a surge in AI-related capital goods imports slowed topline GDP growth relative to what would be implied by investment outlays, and inventory liquidation also reduced growth. Our measure of corporate revenue growth accelerated to 6.2% annualized in Q2 2026, up from 5.7% in Q1 2026, but price rather than volume accounted for a disproportionate share of that growth. Our data imply real consumption slowed to 1.8% annualized as households absorbed the price shock, with spending among top-third households growing at 2.3x the rate of bottom-third households. Headline inflation finished June at a 3.7% annual rate, and with core inflation above 3%, the Fed has not hit its inflation target in five years. Against this backdrop, interest rates no longer appear to be on a pre-set path toward sub-3%, and market participants largely expect the Fed’s next move to be a rate hike. The clearest source of strength was business investment: our data indicate U.S. business spending rose at a 15.8% annualized rate, with corporate information technology services up 28.3%. AI-related investment remains the primary driver—compute capex has grown at an 80% annualized rate since year-end 2024, and data center real estate is now roughly 3.8x its year-end 2022 level. This spending surge is also bidding away finite resources—grid capacity, engineering talent, construction labor, and key materials—raising input costs and creating headwinds for competing capital projects.

Added

European conditions stabilized as the quarter progressed. German factory orders, while still negative, rebounded from post-conflict troughs, and euro area order books improved, signaling firmer forward demand. A notable structural development was the agreement by the EU’s six largest economies on capital markets integration, which could mobilize an estimated €8 trillion of household savings currently held in low-yielding deposits toward more productive investment. In China, domestic consumption continued to contract, with weakness particularly evident in big-ticket categories previously supported by trade-in subsidies. Exports remained the structural growth driver, with export growth to the U.S. turning positive for the first time since the 2025 trade war. Taiwan and South Korea continue to benefit from AI-linked semiconductor demand—South Korean semiconductor exports are growing at a record 180% annual rate—though concentration risk remains elevated, with Samsung and SK Hynix’s combined market cap reaching approximately 135% of South Korea’s GDP. Japan has also benefited from AI-related export growth, and recent moves in the yen and JGB yields appear to reflect a gradual normalization rather than a sovereign or currency crisis. In India, growth appears resilient, but the country’s reliance on imported oil and gas leaves it exposed to renewed energy supply disruptions.

Added

Merger and acquisition (“M&A”) activity in the first half of 2026 surpassed the record aggregate deal value set in the first half of 2021, though those headline figures increasingly reflected a relatively small number of large transactions.

Added

Transactions totaled $1.75 trillion, a 23% increase quarter-over-quarter and a 66% increase over the same period a year ago, even as transaction counts declined 15% quarter-over-quarter and 12% year-over-year. Leveraged buyout (“LBO”) activity was more subdued. U.S. buyouts slowed in the second quarter, with deal volume falling 45% from the first quarter as managers digested higher energy prices and saw hopes for Fed rate cuts fade. European buyouts helped take up the slack, with volume increasing 51% in EMEA to exceed the U.S. by more than $13 billion. Exit activity remained constrained—announced buyout exit value of $245 billion declined 23% quarter-over-quarter, and the 595 companies divested globally represented the lowest quarterly count since 2020. However, median exit EBITDA multiples continued to improve, rising to a range of 14.7x to 17.6x for deals exited in the fourth quarter of 2025 and first quarter of 2026 (the latest data available), compared to a range of 11.0x to 13.0x over much of 2022 through 2024. Meanwhile, initial public offering (“IPO”) activity was a bright spot, with 39 operating company IPOs on U.S. exchanges generating $117 billion in proceeds, an 86% increase in transaction count versus Q1 2026.

Added

SpaceX’s $86 billion IPO—22 years after founding—was emblematic of broader structural trends: private markets are capturing an increasing share of value creation before listing, while passive investing is exerting a growing influence on public market behavior.

Added

Credit markets demonstrated broad resilience during the quarter, with improving conditions across most sectors even as differentiation increased. Broader credit quality continued to improve: leveraged loan defaults plus distressed exchanges fell to their lowest level in over three years at 2.77%, while the weighted average bid on the U.S. leveraged loan market ended the quarter at 94.96, modestly below its year-end 2025 level of 96.64 but essentially unchanged from 95 at the end of the first quarter. Amendment activity (repricings and extensions) also remained relatively steady from the first quarter, as a more than doubling of extensions largely offset a decline in refinancings. Notably, weakness remained concentrated rather than broad-based. Excluding software, the average secondary bid firmed by roughly 0.4 points over the quarter, while software loans fell approximately 1.9 points, widening the gap between software and the rest of the index to a historically wide 9.6 points. CLO new issuance moderated from last year’s pace amid tight loan spreads and continued uncertainty around software and energy exposures.

Removed

The commencement of hostilities in the Middle East and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz have not yet manifested as visible economic damage. However, risks to the global economy remain elevated as the conflict in the Middle East persists, and those risks will continue to rise for as long as the Strait remains effectively shut. Approximately 20% of global crude oil, 20% of global liquid natural gas (“LNG”), 30% of global helium supplies, and 50% of global stocks of urea, the most widely used nitrogenous fertilizer, transit the Strait. For the industrial sector, energy looms large, but for many businesses beyond this sector, disruptions to supplies of petrochemicals, metals, helium, and other byproducts of LNG processing are just as significant. In the U.S., which is less reliant on imports that traverse the Strait, impacts seem most likely to manifest in higher prices, which could put downward pressure on consumption demand and slow overall growth. For much of the rest of the world, impacts could be more substantial, with physical shortages of energy and supplies resulting in outright demand destruction. Global supply shortages also have significant implications for the AI buildout, and AI-related capex growth intentions could be pared back materially should the conflict become prolonged.

Removed

In equity markets, investors have grown skeptical about returns to AI capex: the Magnificent 7 stocks declined 12% during the quarter, though recent layoff announcements (presumably in an effort to offset these AI-related capex costs) and soaring cloud revenues have driven a recovery rally that has more than erased the drawdown, lifting the group above its October 2025 market peak to new all-time highs (as of May 8, 2026). The quarter was also marked by distinct pre- and post-conflict market dynamics. In the U.S., prior to February 27, 2026, investors rotated away from mega-cap technology and software toward “real economy” sectors: industrials were up 14%, while SaaS stocks were down 30% from the start of the year through that date, as new AI capabilities raised concerns about incumbent business models. After February 27, 2026, however, that rotation partially reversed in response to the energy shock, and industrials underperformed through quarter-end. Since the end of the first quarter of 2026, both “real economy” sectors and enterprise software (which is seen as less vulnerable to AI disruption) have performed well, while SaaS and cloud services providers continue to lag. Overall, the S&P 500 ended the quarter down 4.6%, though significant upgrades to “consensus” earnings estimates coupled with market optimism for an end to the Middle East conflict have driven the index to record highs in May. This recent rally is a symptom of the difficulty investors face in hedging and quantifying geopolitical risk. In contrast to other discrete shocks, such as the failure of SVB in 2023, markets face less clarity in mapping out the trajectory of evolving geopolitical developments and so tend to “look through” them. Globally, Japan’s Nikkei and Europe’s Euro Stoxx 50 started the quarter up 16.9% and 6%, respectively, prior to the outbreak of hostilities, but ultimately finished the quarter up just 1.4% and down 3.8%, respectively. The shock also reaffirmed the notion that bonds no longer hedge equity market risk. Bonds have now sold off with stocks during each major shock of the last 12 months, and the correlation between the monthly returns of stocks and bonds has moved from -25% to +50% since 2022.

Removed

As the “natural” hedge of the traditional 60/40 portfolio continues to dissolve, investors may choose to rotate towards private markets to achieve greater diversification.

Removed

The U.S. economy retained underlying momentum during the quarter. The labor market did not show obvious signs of deterioration, and our measure of real final demand—a proxy for real GDP net of foreign trade and inventories—grew at a 2.7% annualized rate, a result consistent with 5.7% annual growth in S&P 1500 revenue. Business spending continued to advance at an 11.1% annualized rate, led by AI-related investment. That strength is not limited to capex associated with data centers, which continues to grow at prodigious rates, but also reflects enterprise IT budgets, as the need to devise and implement AI strategies has moved technology spending from “nice to have” to a top corporate priority. Much of the spending thus far has been concentrated in data capture, storage, and analytics, with companies also reporting significant value from dynamic pricing algorithms that have allowed them to optimize prices across customers and products. At the same time, portfolio-wide energy prices increased, while stronger transportation and logistics volumes suggested that some activity may have been pulled forward in anticipation of higher prices and/or outright shortages. For many businesses, the challenge extends beyond energy to supplies of petrochemicals, metals, helium, and other byproducts of LNG processing, with many focused on “taking price” to defend margins in the face of escalating input costs. To date, our data are consistent with a short-term price shock and distortion in volumes and shipments rather than sustained inflation. However, it is important to appreciate that energy and durable consumer goods have been the expenditure categories doing the most to keep a lid on overall inflation. A reversal here seems likely to intensify households’ affordability concerns as the supply impulse transitions from disinflationary to inflationary.

Removed

Although these pressures have not yet resulted in visible economic damage, there were signs of growing divergence in consumer activity towards the end of Q1 2026, including a sharp deceleration in experiences spending and softer demand among lower-income households, which could become more pronounced if current supply disruptions persist.

Removed

For much of the rest of the world, the question is not simply pricing output appropriately, but curtailing production schedules in advance of looming shortages. In Europe, our proprietary portfolio data suggest domestic demand remained positive through the first quarter of the year. However, the risks associated with the conflict appear more acute outside the United States, as the region is more exposed to imported energy and other industrial inputs that could become subject to physical shortages if disruption persists. Our data indicated that the signs of recovery in Europe’s industrial sector, which were apparent earlier in the quarter, receded in March, with a sharp deceleration in German factory orders and weakness in manufacturing despite massive public investment outlays. By contrast, China experienced firm retail sales and sustained momentum in industrial output despite ongoing weakness in its property sector. China imported more than 1.7 million barrels per day of oil from Iran in March, defying expectations that it would be among the economies hardest hit by the conflict.

Removed

Energy availability appears to have been an important differentiator in supporting continued manufacturing activity. Elsewhere in Asia, Taiwan and South Korea continued to benefit from the AI buildout and strong demand for electronic components, but those tailwinds do not insulate them from shortages of helium, LNG, and other inputs critical to semiconductor production. If the Strait remains blocked, initial cutbacks are likely to focus on lower-value-added chips, but a prolonged disruption could begin to weigh more materially on broader AI-related capex and industrial output. In India, growth similarly appears resilient to date, but risks to the outlook are significant. India is one of the economies in the region most reliant on oil and gas imports, and continued disruption to supply could not only harm domestic consumption but could also result in production shutdowns across its industrial sector.

Removed

Global M&A activity was strong during the quarter. Transactions totaled $1.4 trillion, a 25% increase over Q1 2025.

Removed

Leveraged buyout (“LBO”) activity, however, was not as robust. GPs announced LBOs totaling $126 billion in the first quarter of 2026, a deceleration both quarter-over-quarter (-21%) and year-over-year (-3.5%). Underlying transaction counts remained relatively subdued at 434 deals, a 9% decrease from the same quarter a year ago, with the top 10 transactions accounting for nearly 70% of total deal volume. Broader market volatility also impacted buyout exits in the quarter. Aggregate exit volumes of $94 billion were down -15% quarter-over-quarter and were 17% lower than in the first quarter of 2025. There were 21 operating company IPOs on U.S. exchanges in the first quarter, consistent with Q4 2025 in terms of transaction count, but substantially lower (-37%) in terms of proceeds. Offerings skewed noticeably smaller, with only one transaction generating proceeds over $1 billion. Broader market volatility related to the Middle East conflict appears to have curtailed appetite for public offerings, with only three operating company IPOs on U.S. exchanges in March. Continued equity market volatility tied to ongoing geopolitical risks may push out exit timing across the private equity industry this year. Lower liquidity and delayed distributions, however, could produce attractive opportunities for our secondaries and portfolio finance platforms.

Removed

Fears related to software exposure and AI-disintermediation risk drove credit spreads wider in the quarter across both broadly syndicated (“BSL”) and direct lending markets, particularly for lower-rated borrowers: in BSL markets, B-flat spreads widened 100 basis points in February and March relative to January. However, broader credit risks still appear contained, as defaults plus distressed exchanges in the leveraged loan market finished the quarter at a 3.48% rate, well below their 2024-2025 average of 4.27%, while private credit defaults stood at 2.73%, modestly above their 2024-2025 average of 2.21%. Recent credit events appear idiosyncratic rather than systemic, while concerns regarding software exposure do not fully reflect the significant dispersion across portfolios, vintages, and software subsectors, some of which appear materially less vulnerable to AI-related disruption than broader market sentiment suggests. Within the CLO market, widened liability spreads have put pressure on new CLO creation and reset activity as compared to recent years, while underlying loan prices have remained relatively resilient. The pullback in demand flows and normalization of spreads from 2025’s post-GFC lows could create opportunities for private credit businesses to deploy capital on more favorable terms.

Reworded

In the firstsecond quarter of 2026, we deployed $10.0$14.3 billion across our platform and in$53.0 contrastbillion toover the decelerationlast intwelve LBOmonths. activityIn inour thetraditional broadercarry market,funds, we realized proceeds of $12.2$6.7 billion in ourthe traditionalsecond carryquarter funds,of 2026 and $36.8 billion over the last twelve months, including $6.9$2.9 billion inand realized$15.3 proceedsbillion, respectively, in our U.S.corporate buyoutprivate funds.equity strategy. We had $13.0$16.8 billion in inflows in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 and $52.5$55.8 billion in inflows over the last twelve months as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026. Inflows over the last twelve months include $7.7$7.3 billion in our evergreen wealth products, which had $19.0$20.1 billion in assets under management as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, a nearly 80%64% increase from one year ago.

Reworded

Our carry fund portfolio appreciated 1%3% in the firstsecond quarter. Within our Global Private Equity segment in the firstsecond quarter, our corporate private equity funds depreciatedappreciated (2)%2% as market price decreases in certain publicly traded positions offset appreciation elsewhere, our infrastructure & natural resources funds appreciated 9%6% driven by our international energy funds and appreciation in the NGP Carry funds, and our real estate funds appreciatedwere 1%.flat. Our Global Credit carry funds, which represent approximately 11% of the total Global Credit remaining fair value as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, appreciated 4% in the firstsecond quarter. Carry funds in our Carlyle AlpInvest segment were flat in the first quarter.

Added

Carry funds in our Carlyle AlpInvest segment appreciated 3% in the second quarter.

Reworded

In AprilJuly 2026, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share to common stockholders of record at the close of business on MayAugust 18,17, 2026, payable on MayAugust 28,26, 2026.

Added

Global Private Equity Structured Investment Vehicle

Added

During the second quarter of 2026, the Company completed the structuring of an investment vehicle in our Global Private Equity segment, which created liquidity for our fund investors and raised capital earmarked for our next vintage U.S. buyout fund. In connection with the transaction, the Company recognized portfolio advisory and transaction fees in our Global Credit segment results during the quarter. Additionally, the Company transferred interests in certain fund-related entities to the vehicle, which are reflected as a component of non-controlling interests in consolidated entities on our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2026.

Reworded

Performance allocations consist principally of the performance-based capital allocation from fund limited partners to us, commonly referred to as carried interest, from certain of our investment funds, which we refer to as the “carry funds.” Carried interest revenue is recognized by Carlyle upon appreciation of the valuation of our funds’ investments above certain return hurdles as set forth in each respective fund partnership agreement and is based on the amount that would be due to us pursuant to the fund partnership agreement at each period end as if the funds were liquidated at such date. Accordingly, the amount of carried interest recognized as performance allocations reflects our share of the fair value gains and losses of the associated funds’ underlying investments measured at their then-current fair values relative to the fair values as of the end of the prior period. As a result, the performance allocations earned in an applicable reporting period are not indicative of any future period, as fair values are based on conditions prevalent as of the reporting date. Refer to “—Trends Affecting Our Business” for further discussion.

Reworded

Under our arrangements with the historical owners and management teams of AlpInvest and Abingworth, the amount of carried interest to which we are entitled varies. In some cases, we are entitled to 15% of the carried interest in respect of commitments from the historical owners of AlpInvest for the period between 2011 and 2020. In certain instances, carried interest associated with the AlpInvest fund vehicles is subject to entity level income taxes in the Netherlands. Additionally, in connection with the acquisition of Abingworth, we are entitled to 15% of carried interest generated from certain Abingworth funds.

Removed

Realized carried interest may be clawed back or given back to the fund if the fund’s investment values decline below certain return hurdles, which vary from fund to fund. This amount is known as the “giveback obligation.” In all cases, each investment fund is considered separately in evaluating carried interest and potential giveback obligations. See Note 7, Commitments and Contingencies, for more information.

Reworded

Accrued performance allocations and accrued giveback obligations at a point in time assume a hypothetical liquidation of the funds’ investments at their then currentthen-current fair values. Each investment fund is considered separately in evaluating carried interest and potential giveback obligations. These assets and liabilities will continue to fluctuate in accordance with the fair values of the funds’ investments until they are realized. The Company uses “net accrued performance revenues” to refer to the aggregation of the accrued performance allocations net of (i) accrued giveback obligations, (ii) accrued performance allocations related compensation, (iii) performance allocations related tax obligations, and (iv) accrued performance allocations attributable to non-controlling interests. Net accrued performance revenues exclude any net accrued performance allocations and incentive fees that have been realized but will be collected in subsequent periods, as well as net accrued performance revenues which are presented as fee related performance revenues when realized in our non-GAAP financial measures. Realized performance allocation-related compensation that has not yet been paid is also excluded from our net accrued performance allocations.

Reworded

In addition, realized performance allocations may be reversed in future periods if a fund’s investment values decline below certain return hurdles, which vary from fund to thefund, extent that such amountsand become subject to a giveback obligation. See Note 7, Commitments and Contingencies, for more information. The aggregate amount of giveback obligations realized since Carlyle’s inception totaled $264.6 million, $181.8 million of which was related to various Legacy Energy Funds. Given that current and former senior Carlyle professionals and other limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships are responsible for paying the majority of the realized giveback obligation, only $88.5 million of the $264.6 million aggregate giveback obligation realized since inception was attributable to Carlyle. The realization of giveback obligations for the Company’s portion of such obligations reduces Distributable Earnings in the period realized. Further, each individual who holds equity interests in carried interest generated by our funds and is a recipient of realized carried interest typically signs a guarantee agreement or partnership agreement that personally obligates such person to return his/her pro rata share of any amounts of realized carried interest previously distributed that are later clawed back. Accordingly, carried interest as performance allocation compensation is subject to return to the Company in the event a giveback obligation is funded. Generally, the actual giveback liability, if any, does not become due until the end of a fund’s life.

Reworded

In addition, in our discussion of our non-GAAP results, we use the term “realized net performance revenues” to refer to realized performance allocations and incentive fees from our funds, net of the(i) portionamounts allocated to our investment professionals,professionals and other employeesemployees, (ii) non-controlling interests, and (iii) certain tax expenses associated with carried interest attributable to certain partners and employees, which are reflected as realized performance allocations and incentive fees related compensation expense. See “—Non-GAAP Financial Measures” and “—Segment Analysis” for the amount of realized net performance revenues recognized each period and related discussion.

Reworded

Investment income also represents the realized and unrealized gains and losses on our principal investments, including our investments in Carlyle funds that are not consolidated, and our strategic investments in NGP as described below. Realized principal investment income (loss) is recorded when we redeem all or a portion of our investment or when we receive or are due cash income, such as dividends or distributions. A realized principal investment loss is also recorded when an investment is deemed to be permanently impaired or worthless. Unrealized principal investment income (loss) results from changes in the fair value of the underlying investment, as well as the reversal of previously recognized unrealized gains (losses) at the time an investment is realized.

Reworded

We account for our investments in NGP under the equity method of accounting. Our investments in NGP include the equity interests in NGP Management and the general partners of certain carry funds advised by NGP.NGP, Following the restructuring of the terms of our strategic investment in NGP in March 2025 (the “Restructuring”), our equity interests in NGP Managementwhich entitle us to an allocation of income equalup to 55.0% of the management fee related revenues earned by NGP Management forin existingcertain funds, and up to 55.0% for all NGP funds that held an initial closing after December 31, 2024, including all management fees being retained by NGP for the years 2025 through 2028 on such future NGP funds. Our investment in the general partners of the NGP Carry Funds entitle us to up to 47.5% of the performance allocations received fromby certain NGP fund general partners. For further information regarding our strategic investments in NGP and the Restructuring, refer to Note 4, Investments, to the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Reworded

Net investment income (loss) of Consolidated Funds. Net investment income (loss) of Consolidated Funds generally measures the change in the difference in fair value between the assets and the liabilities of the Consolidated Funds. Income (loss) indicates that the fair value of the assets of the Consolidated Funds appreciated more (less), or depreciated less (more), than the fair value of the liabilities of the Consolidated Funds. Income or loss is not necessarily indicative of the investment performance of the Consolidated Funds and does not impact the management or incentive fees received by Carlyle for its management of the Consolidated Funds. The portion of the net investment income (losses) of Consolidated Funds attributable to the limited partner investors is allocated to non-controlling interests. Moreover, although the assets of the Consolidated Funds are consolidated onto our balance sheet pursuant to U.S. GAAP, ultimately we do not have recourse to such assets and such liabilities are generally non-recourse to us. Therefore, income or loss is not expected to have a material impact on the revenues or profitability ofof, or the assets available to, the Company beyond the Company’s capital invested in the Consolidated Funds. Moreover, although the assets of the Consolidated Funds are consolidated onto our balance sheet pursuant to U.S.

Removed

GAAP, ultimately we do not have recourse to such assets and such liabilities are generally non-recourse to us. Therefore, income or loss from the Consolidated Funds does not generally have a material impact on the assets available to our common stockholders.

Added

Income taxes. The Carlyle Group Inc. is a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes and thus is subject to U.S.

Added

federal, state, and local corporate income taxes. The interim provision for income taxes is generally calculated using an estimated annual effective tax rate applied to year-to-date ordinary income in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes.

Removed

Income taxes. Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method of accounting. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis, using currently enacted tax rates. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period in which the change is enacted. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Reworded

Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities. Non-controlling interests in consolidated entities represent the component of equity in consolidated entities not held by us. These interests are adjusted for general partner allocations.

Reworded

(1)Ending balances as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 exclude $21.2$27.6 billion and $25.6$17.6 billion, respectively, of Pending Fee-earning AUM for which fees have not yet been activated.

Reworded

(1)Inflows represents limited partner capital raised by our carry funds or separately managed accounts for which management fees based on commitments were activated during the period, the fee-earning commitments invested in vehicles for which management fees are based on invested capital, theincremental fee-earning collateral balance offrom new CLO issuances,issuances and resets, reinsurance and other transactions at Fortitude, as well as gross subscriptions in vehicles for which management fees are based on net asset value. Inflows exclude fundraising amounts during the period for which fees have not yet been activated, which are referenced as Pending Fee-earning AUM.

Reworded

Our calculations of AUM and Fee-earning AUM may differ from the calculations of other asset managers. As a result, these measures may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other asset managers. In addition, our calculation of AUM (but not Fee-earning AUM) includes uncalled commitments to, and the fair value of invested capital in, our investment funds from Carlyle and our personnel, regardless of whether such commitments or invested capital are subject to management fees or performance allocations. Our calculations of AUM orand Fee-earning AUM are not based on any definition of AUM or Fee-earning AUM that is set forth in the agreements governing the investment funds that we manage or advise.

Reworded

Perpetual Capital. “Perpetual Capital” refers to the assets we manage or advise which have an indefinite term and for which there is no immediate requirement to return capital to investors upon the realization of investments made with such capital, except as required by applicable law. Perpetual Capital may be materially reduced or terminated under certain conditions, including reductions from changes in valuations and payments to investors, including through elections by investors to redeem their investments, dividend payments, and other payment obligations, as well as the termination of or failure to renew the respective investment advisory agreements. Perpetual Capital includes: (a) assets managed under the strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude, (b) our Core Plus real estate fund, (c) our business development companies and certain other direct lending products, (d) Carlyle Tactical Private Credit Fund (“CTAC”), (e) our closed-end tender offer Carlyle AlpInvest Private Markets (“CAPM”) funds and Carlyle AlpInvest Private Markets Secondaries (“CAPS”) funds, and (f) certain other structured credit and asset-backed finance products. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our total AUM and Fee-earning AUM included $115.8$119.7 billion and $111.5$113.2 billion, respectively, of Perpetual Capital. Our Perpetual Capital total AUM and Fee-earning AUM, exclusive of assets managed under the strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude, was $36.7$39.9 billion and $32.3$33.5 billion, respectively, as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026.

Reworded

Performance Fee Eligible AUM. “Performance Fee Eligible AUM” represents the AUM of funds for which we are entitled to receive performance allocations, inclusive of the fair value of investments in those funds (which we refer to as “Performance Fee Eligible Fair Value”) and their Available Capital. Performance Fee Eligible Fair Value is “Performance Fee- Generating” when the associated fund has achieved the specified investment returns required under the terms of the fund’s agreement and is accruing performance revenue as of the quarter-end reporting date. Funds whose performance allocations are treated as fee related performance revenues are excluded from these metrics. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our total AUM included $230.7$236.6 billion of Performance Fee Eligible AUM.

Reworded

The Company consolidates all entities that it controls either through a majority voting interest or as the primary beneficiary of variable interest entities. The fund entities we consolidate are referred to collectively as the Consolidated Funds in our condensed consolidated financial statements. The assets and liabilities of the Consolidated Funds are generally held within separate legal entities and, as a result, the assets of the Consolidated Funds are not available to support our operating activities and similarly the liabilities of the Consolidated Funds are non-recourse to us. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our Consolidated Funds represent approximately 4% of our AUM; 2% and 2% of our management fees for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 20262026, respectively; and 11%20% and 18% of our total investment income or loss on an unconsolidated basis for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.2026, respectively.

Reworded

We are not required under the consolidation guidance to consolidate in our financial statements most of the investment funds we advise. However, we consolidate certain CLOs and certain other funds that we advise, and the number of funds we are required to consolidate has been increasing as a result of the impacts of capital from our balance sheet invested in new products and our indirect interest in funds through our investment in Fortitude (see Note 4, Investments). As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the assets and liabilities of the Consolidated Funds were primarily related to our consolidated CLOs, which held approximately $12.0$10.9 billion of total assets. Additionally, the Investments of Consolidated Funds included approximately $0.9$1.1 billion related to investments that have been bridged to investment funds in our Global Private Equity segment.

Reworded

Generally, the consolidation of the Consolidated Funds has a gross-up effect on our assets, liabilities and cash flows but has no net effect on the net income attributable to the Company.Company beyond the capital contributed by the Company to the Consolidated Funds. The majority of the net economic ownership interests of the Consolidated Funds are reflected as non-controlling interests in consolidated entities in the condensed consolidated financial statements. However, in certain Consolidated Funds, particularly those where we have elected to invest additional amounts or bridge investments in new investment areas, the non-controlling interests are less significant and may impact net income attributable to the common stockholders.

Reworded

The following table and discussion sets forth information regarding our condensed consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025. Our condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on substantially the same basis for all historical periods presented; however, the Consolidated Funds are not the same entities in all periods shown due to changes in fund terms and the creation and termination of funds. As further described above, the consolidation of these funds primarily has the impact of increasing interest and other income of Consolidated Funds, interest and other expenses of Consolidated Funds, and net investment income (losses) of Consolidated Funds in the year that the fund is initially consolidated. The consolidation of these funds had no effect on net income attributable to the Company for the periods presented.

Added

Fund management fees. The following table provides the components of the changes in Fund management fees for the periods presented:

Added

(1)The three and six months ended June 30, 2025 included approximately $19 million of aviation catch-up subordinated management fees.

Removed

Fund management fees. Fund management fees decreased $2.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025, primarily due to the following:

Reworded

(12)Total decreaseincrease in Fund management fees does not include our equity income allocation from NGP management fee related revenues. We do not control NGP and account for our strategic investment in NGP as an equity method investment under U.S. GAAP. Therefore, Fund management fees associated with NGP are included in Principal investment income (loss) in our U.S. GAAP results.

Showing the first 60 of 273 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

CG insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 1 filing (1 insider, 1 trade date, 400,000 shares, about $17.1M). Net open-market shares: -400,000 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$17.1M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2026-09-11Rubenstein David M.
Director
Open-market sale 400,000$42.74 $17.1M26,899,644 SEC
2026-09-11Rubenstein David M.
Director
Gift 100,000— —27,299,644 SEC
2026-08-26Nedelman Jeffrey
Co-President
Grant/award 6,615— —1,609,479 SEC
2026-08-26Heinzelman Kate Elizabeth
General Counsel
Grant/award 78— —11,109 SEC
2026-08-26Andrews Charles Elliott Jr.
Chief Accounting Officer
Grant/award 304— —135,668 SEC
2026-08-26Plouffe Justin
Chief Financial Officer
Grant/award 3,769— —852,461 SEC
2026-08-26Redett John C.
Co-President
Grant/award 8,302— —1,752,000 SEC
2026-08-26Schwartz Harvey M
Director, Chief Executive Officer
Grant/award 19,240— —5,273,362 SEC
2026-08-26Lobue Lindsay
Chief Operating Officer
Grant/award 2,657— —700,578 SEC
2026-08-26Jenkins Mark David
Co-President
Grant/award 6,264— —1,415,478 SEC
2026-08-01Andrews Charles Elliott Jr.
Chief Accounting Officer
Shares withheld for tax 12,364$46.02 $569.0K135,364 SEC
2026-08-01Plouffe Justin
Chief Financial Officer
Shares withheld for tax 62,533$46.02 $2.9M848,692 SEC
2026-08-01Redett John C.
Co-President
Shares withheld for tax 124,558$46.02 $5.7M1,743,698 SEC
2026-08-01Heinzelman Kate Elizabeth
General Counsel
Grant/award 11,031— —11,031 SEC
2026-08-01Nedelman Jeffrey
Co-President
Shares withheld for tax 43,081$46.02 $2.0M1,602,864 SEC
2026-08-01Lobue Lindsay
Chief Operating Officer
Shares withheld for tax 18,284$46.02 $841.4K697,921 SEC
2026-08-01Jenkins Mark David
Co-President
Shares withheld for tax 124,793$46.02 $5.7M1,409,214 SEC
2026-05-28Lobue Lindsay
Chief Operating Officer
Grant/award 3,120— —716,205 SEC
2026-05-28Jenkins Mark David
Co-President
Grant/award 7,634— —1,534,007 SEC
2026-05-28Plouffe Justin
Chief Financial Officer
Grant/award 4,077— —911,225 SEC
2026-05-28Andrews Charles Elliott Jr.
Chief Accounting Officer
Grant/award 409— —147,728 SEC
2026-05-28Nedelman Jeffrey
Co-President
Grant/award 7,733— —1,645,945 SEC
2026-05-28Redett John C.
Co-President
Grant/award 10,830— —1,868,256 SEC
2026-05-28Ferguson Jeffrey W.
General Counsel
Grant/award 1,274— —783,474 SEC
2026-05-28Schwartz Harvey M
Director, Chief Executive Officer
Grant/award 20,743— —5,254,122 SEC
2026-05-01Cherwoo Sharda
Director
Grant/award 4,450— —20,398 SEC
2026-05-01Hance James H Jr
Director
Grant/award 4,450— —316,538 SEC
2026-05-01Filler Linda
Director
Grant/award 4,450— —26,163 SEC
2026-05-01Shaw William Joseph
Director
Grant/award 4,450— —78,093 SEC
2026-05-01Ordan Mark S
Director
Grant/award 4,450— —26,163 SEC
2026-05-01Ordan Mark S
Director
Grant/award 4,450$49.44 $220.0K30,613 SEC
2026-05-01Welters Anthony
Director
Grant/award 4,450— —47,849 SEC
2026-05-01Fitt Lawton W
Director
Grant/award 4,450— —78,093 SEC
2026-05-01Rice Derica W
Director
Grant/award 2,933$49.44 $145.0K36,657 SEC
2026-05-01Rice Derica W
Director
Grant/award 4,450— —33,724 SEC
2026-05-01Beschloss Afsaneh Mashayekhi
Director
Grant/award 4,450— —14,689 SEC

Well-known investors holding CG (13F)

InvestorQuarterSharesReported value% of their 13FChange vs prior quarter
Harris Associates (Oakmark Funds) COM2026-06-3017,661,625$743.7M0.99%Added 6%
Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) COM2026-06-302,184,854$92.0M0.14%Added 976%
Markel Group (Tom Gayner) COM2026-06-301,327,000$55.9M0.43%No change
Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) COM2026-06-30835,171$35.2M0.02%New position
Renaissance Technologies COM2026-06-30744,700$31.4M0.04%Added 445%
D. E. Shaw & Co. COM2026-06-30238,883$10.1M0.01%Added 1263%
AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) COM2026-06-30234,942$9.9M0.0%Reduced 16%
Soros Fund Management COM2026-06-30226,767$9.5M0.13%Reduced 7%
Millennium Management (Israel Englander) COM2026-06-30178,458$7.5M0.01%Reduced 97%
Two Sigma Investments COM2026-06-3048,931$2.1M0.0%New position
Gotham Asset Management (Joel Greenblatt) COM2026-06-3043,139$1.8M0.0%Reduced 1%

13F reports are filed up to 45 days after quarter end and show long U.S. equity positions only; options positions are omitted here.

Coming soon: email alerts when CG files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.