CHMI 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corp (also CHMI-PB, CHMI-PA) · NYSE · Real Estate Investment Trusts · CIK 1571776 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Changes in U.S. trade policies, including the imposition of tariffs and retaliatory tariffs, may adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.”
Removed heading “Risks Related to the Termination of our Management Agreement with CHMM”
Removed heading “We may not be able to fully realize the expected benefits of our transition to a self-managed company or the ability to realize such benefits may take longer than anticipated.”
Removed heading “Potential legal matters related to the termination of the management agreement with CHMM could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and our financial condition.”
Largest changes
“Recently, there have been significant changes to trade policies, export control laws, sanctions, legislation, treaties, and tariffs in the United States and other countries. The future of global trade relationships remains uncertain, including with respect to potential changes in trade laws, regulations, policies, and tariffs. …”see in full comparison
“Changes in U.S. trade policies, including the imposition of tariffs and retaliatory tariffs, may adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.”see in full comparison
“As of the date of filing this Annual Report on Form 10-K, no litigation relating to our termination of the management agreement without payment of a termination fee is pending. While we are not aware of any plans by CHMM, our former external manager, to file a complaint against us relating to our termination of the management agreement, it is possible that CHMM could file a complaint against us alleging, among other things, breach of contract. …”see in full comparison
“Potential legal matters related to the termination of the management agreement with CHMM could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and our financial condition.”see in full comparison
“We may not be able to fully realize the expected benefits of our transition to a self-managed company or the ability to realize such benefits may take longer than anticipated.”see in full comparison
“Risks Related to the Termination of our Management Agreement with CHMM”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (10)
Changes in U.S. trade policies, including the imposition of tariffs and retaliatory tariffs, may adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Recently, there have been significant changes to trade policies, export control laws, sanctions, legislation, treaties, and tariffs in the United States and other countries. The future of global trade relationships remains uncertain, including with respect to potential changes in trade laws, regulations, policies, and tariffs. While we are not directly engaged in international trade, such developments can indirectly affect macroeconomic conditions in the United States, including inflation and interest rates-both of which have a significant impact on the residential real estate and mortgage markets. For example, heightened tariffs or ongoing trade disputes may lead to increased input costs, contributing to inflationary pressures and potentially influencing monetary policy decisions by the Federal Reserve. Fluctuating interest rates could, in turn, reduce housing affordability, slow home price appreciation, increase mortgage delinquency rates, and adversely impact the performance of the residential mortgage assets in which we invest. We cannot predict what additional actions may be taken by the United States or other governments, what sectors may be affected, or how financial markets may respond. To the extent that trade policy changes or broader geopolitical developments adversely affect inflation, interest rates, or the housing and mortgage markets more generally, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Risks Related to the Termination of our Management Agreement with CHMM
We may not be able to fully realize the expected benefits of our transition to a self-managed company or the ability to realize such benefits may take longer
than anticipated.
On November 14, 2024, the management agreement with CHMM terminated and we thereafter became a self-managed company. We believe that the termination of the management agreement, the
elimination of the quarterly management fee payment and the transition to a self-management structure will result in material benefits to our stockholders, including substantial cost savings, the potential for enhanced returns on
future capital growth, the elimination of conflicts of interest and strengthened alignment of interests between management and stockholders, and the potential to attract new institutional investors.
Our ability to fully and timely realize the anticipated benefits of this transition is subject to various risks. Certain risks that may adversely impact the process include: any
adverse impacts resulting from litigation with CHMM related to the termination of the management agreement; unforeseen or higher than anticipated expenses following the transition; and other unforeseen developments resulting from
the change in our management structure. The failure to manage the transition process efficiently and effectively could result in the anticipated benefits of the transition not being realized in the timeframe currently anticipated or
at all.
Following
our internalization, we are responsible for functions previously performed by our external manager, which may result in additional costs, including, among other things, expenses related to hiring and retaining employees,
compensation and benefits, and other operational and administrative costs. We are also subject to potential liabilities commonly faced by employers, such as workers’ compensation claims, labor disputes, and other employee-related
matters. If the ongoing costs of operating as an internally managed company exceed the expenses we previously incurred under our external management structure, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely
affected.
Potential legal matters related to the termination of the management agreement with CHMM could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and our
financial condition.
As of the date of filing this Annual Report on Form 10-K, no litigation relating to our termination of the management agreement without payment of a termination fee is pending.
While we are not aware of any plans by CHMM, our former external manager, to file a complaint against us relating to our termination of the management agreement, it is possible that CHMM could file a complaint against us alleging,
among other things, breach of contract. Our board of directors believes that we complied with the terms of the management agreement and that any complaint filed by CHMM would be without merit. However, the results of litigation are
inherently uncertain and we are unable to predict the outcome of any litigation relating to termination of the management agreement if it is commenced by CHMM or by us. It is possible that a court could find that we breached the
management agreement and any damages or costs and fees that may be awarded to CHMM could be significant. While we would dispute and intend to vigorously defend against any claims made by CHMM that we breached the terms of the
management agreement, it is possible that the results of any potential litigation with CHMM could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and our financial condition.
The maximum tax rate applicable to “qualified dividend income” payable to U.S. stockholders that are taxed at individual rates is 20% (plus the 3.8% surtax on net investment income,
if applicable).
Dividends payable by REITs, however, are generally not eligible for the reduced rates on qualified dividend income. However, REIT dividends constitute “qualified business income” and thus a 20% deduction is available
to individual taxpayers with
respect to such dividends, resulting in a 29.6% maximum federal tax rate (plus the 3.8% surtax on net investment income, if applicable) for individual U.S. stockholders. Unless Congress takes action, the
20% deduction applicable to REIT dividends will expire on January 1, 2026. The more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate qualified dividends
could cause investors who are taxed at individual rates to perceive investments
in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the
shares of REITs, including our stock.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Management Fee to Affiliate”
Removed heading “Management Agreement”
Removed heading “Joint Marketing Recapture Agreement”
Largest changes
“The Management Agreement with CHMM, which was terminated on November 14, 2024, provided that CHMM was entitled to receive a management fee, the reimbursement of certain expenses and, in certain circumstances, a termination fee. The management fee was an amount equal to 1.5% per annum of stockholders’ equity, adjusted as set forth in the Management Agreement, and calculated and payable quarterly in arrears. …”see in full comparison
As of December 31,see in full comparison2024,2025, Aurora had four subservicing agreements inplace,place.one of which is with Freedom Mortgage. Following the sale of the Ginnie Mae MSRs to Freedom Mortgage in June 2020, Freedom Mortgage continued to subservice certain loans that had been purchased from Ginnie Mae pools due to delinquency or default. Freedom Mortgage ceased subservicing these loans during 2021 because these loans and any related advance claims had been rehabilitated or liquidated. One of the other subservicingThe agreementsis with RoundPoint Mortgage Servicing Corporation (“RoundPoint”). Freedom Mortgage acquired RoundPoint and it became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Freedom Mortgage in August 2020. On September 30, 2023, RoundPoint ceased being a wholly owned subsidiary of Freedom Mortgage when it was acquired by an unaffiliated entity, Matrix Financial Services Corporation. The agreementseach havevaryingtwo-year initial terms(three years, for Freedom Mortgage, and two years for the other three sub-servicers)and are subject to automatic renewal for additional terms equal to the applicable initial term unless either party chooses not to renew. Each agreement may be terminated without cause by either party by giving notice as specified in the agreement. If an agreement is not renewed by the Company or terminated by the Company without cause, de-boarding fees will be due to the subservicer. Under each agreement, the subservicer agrees to service the applicable mortgage loans in accordance with applicable law and the requirements of the applicable Agency and the Company pays customary fees to the applicable subservicer for specified services. All expiring agreements to date have been automatically renewed for the extended terms.
“In addition, on January 11, 2026, it was reported that the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the District of Columbia is investigating the Federal Reserve’s renovation of its headquarters and whether Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell lied to Congress about the project. In response, Chairman Powell made a public statement that he believed the investigation was initiated because the Federal Reserve would not set interest rates as the President preferred. It is unclear what impact the investigation will have on the future course of U.S. monetary policy.”see in full comparison
“Since September 18, 2024, the Federal Reserve has lowered its federal funds rate target by 0.75% to between 4.50% to 4.75%. Over the past year, the Federal Reserve had kept constant its federal funds rate target after sharply increasing the target and otherwise tightening monetary policy in 2022 and 2023 to combat an increase in U.S. inflation. Inflation peaked in June of 2022 with consumer prices rising at a rate of 9.1% on a year-over-year basis, but has subsequently declined to 2.7% on a year-over-year basis in November of 2024. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (42)
WeOn areNovember 14, 2024, we became a fully integrated, internally managed residential real estate finance company focused on acquiring, investing in and managing residential mortgage assets in the United
States. States.
We were incorporated in Maryland on October 31, 2012, and we commenced operations on or about October 9, 2013, following the completion of our initial public offering and a concurrent private placement. Our common stock, our Series A
Preferred Stock and our Series B Preferred Stock are listed and traded on the NYSE under the symbols “CHMI”, “CHMI-PRA” and “CHMI-PRB”, respectively. As of November 14, 2024, we are a fully integrated, internally managed mortgage
REIT. Prior to November 14, 2024, we were externally managed by Cherry Hill Mortgage Management, LLC, an SEC-registered investment adviser.
Prior to November 14, 2024, we were externally managed and advised by Cherry Hill Mortgage Management, LLC which was responsible for our investment strategies and decisions and our
day-to-day operations, subject to the supervision and oversight of our board of directors. Effective as of November 14, 2024, we completed an “Internalization Event” within the meaning of the management agreement with CHMM by, among
other things, directly hiring the senior management team and other personnel who had historically provided services to us through CHMM. Upon consummation of the Internalization Event, the management agreement terminated in accordance
with its terms without payment of a termination fee and we ceased being externally managed (the “Internalization”). As a result of the Internalization, we began operating as a fully integrated, internally managed company.
In December 2023, the Company initiated a preferred stock repurchase program that allows for the repurchase of up to an aggregate of $50.0 million of its shares of Preferredpreferred Stock.
stock. Shares of preferred
stock may be repurchased from time to time through privately negotiated transactions or open market transactions, pursuant to a trading plan in accordance with Rules 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act. The manner,
price, number and timing of share
repurchases are subject to a variety of factors, including market conditions and applicable SEC rules. The preferred stock repurchase program does not require the purchase of any minimum number of
shares of preferred stock, and, subject to SEC
rules, purchases may be commenced or suspended at any time without prior notice. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company did not repurchase any Preferred Stock pursuant to the repurchase program. During the year ended December 31,
2024, the Company repurchased 395,897 shares of its Series B Preferred
Stock at a weighted average purchase price of $23.77 per share and paid aggregate brokerage commissions of approximately $11,900 on such repurchases. The difference between
the consideration transferred and the carrying value of the
preferred stock repurchased resulted in a gain attributable to common stockholders of $78,000 for the year ended December 30, 2024. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company did not repurchase any Preferred Stock pursuant
to the repurchase program. Shares of preferred stock that are repurchased by the
Company cease to be outstanding but remain authorized for future issuance.
Since September 2025, the Federal Reserve has reduced its federal funds rate target by 75 basis points to a range of 3.50% to 3.75% due to slowing job growth and increased unemployment. Even though inflation remains above its 2 percent target, the Federal Reserve has determined that in evaluating its dual mandate the downside risks to employment have risen.
As of December 1, 2025, the Federal Reserve has also ceased reducing its balance sheet. Since 2022, the Federal Reserve had been allowing a set amount of Treasury securities and Agency RMBS on its balance sheet to roll off each month without reinvestment. Prior to December 1, 2025, the Federal Reserve’s monthly redemption cap on U.S. Treasury Securities was $5 billion and its redemption cap on agency debt/MBS was $35 billion with excess principal payments reinvested in U.S. Treasury securities.
In addition, on January 11, 2026, it was reported that the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the District of Columbia is investigating the Federal Reserve’s renovation of its headquarters and whether Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell lied to Congress about the project. In response, Chairman Powell made a public statement that he believed the investigation was initiated because the Federal Reserve would not set interest rates as the President preferred. It is unclear what impact the investigation will have on the future course of U.S. monetary policy.
Since September 18, 2024, the Federal Reserve has lowered its federal funds rate target by 0.75% to between 4.50% to 4.75%. Over the past year, the Federal Reserve had kept constant
its federal funds rate target after sharply increasing the target and otherwise tightening monetary policy in 2022 and 2023 to combat an increase in U.S. inflation. Inflation peaked in June of 2022 with consumer prices rising at a
rate of 9.1% on a year-over-year basis, but has subsequently declined to 2.7% on a year-over-year basis in November of 2024. Based on this decline in inflation and other data, the Federal Reserve has stated that an easing of monetary
policy is appropriate and that future rate cuts are likely, though the timing will depend on future inflation data. The Federal Reserve has also reduced the speed of the runoff of its balance sheet. On June 1, 2024, the Federal
Reserve lowered its a monthly redemption cap on U.S. Treasury securities to $25 billion from $60 billion and maintained its $35 billion redemption cap on agency debt/MBS. The Federal Reserve reinvests principle payments in excess of
these caps into U.S. Treasury securities in a manner that approximates the maturity composition of outstanding U.S. Treasury securities outstanding.
TheTo the extent the Federal Reserve’sReserve actionstakes future action to ease monetary policy by reducing its federal funds rate and/or reducepurchasing thesecurities speedand at which it is decreasingincreasing its balance sheetsheet, it
will generally lower interest
rates across asset classes, including for Agency RMBS. Lower rates could reduce our funding costs and spur economic activity, increasing our net interest income. Higher prepayment could reduce the length of cash
flows from the MSRs
and accelerate the premium amortization on the RMBS portfolio. In the event that the Federal Reserve reverses course and tightens monetary policy in the future by increasing the federal funds rate and/or theselling ratesecurities ofand
reducing its run off of its
balance sheet, these actions could result in higher interest rates, including for Agency RMBS, and reduce economic activity in the United States, as well as decrease spreads on interest rates, which can reduce our net interest income
and increase our funding costs. They may also negatively impact our results as we have certain assets and liabilities that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. In addition, lower net interest income resulting from higher rates
is partially
offset by lower prepayments which extends the length of cash flows from the MSRs and slows the premium amortization on the RMBS portfolio.
The value of our assets may be affected by prepayment speeds on mortgage loans. Prepayment speed is the measurement of how quickly borrowers pay down the UPBunpaid principal balance of their loans or how
quickly loans are otherwise liquidated or charged off. Generally, in a declining interest rate environment, prepayment speeds tend to increase. Conversely, in an increasing interest rate environment, prepayment speeds tend to
decrease. When we
acquire Servicing Related Assets or RMBS, we anticipate that the underlying mortgage loans will prepay at a projected rate generating an expected cash flow (in the case of Servicing Related Assets) and yield. If we
purchase assets at a premium to
par value and borrowers prepay their mortgage loans faster than expected, the corresponding prepayments on our assets may reduce the expected yield on such assets because we will have to amortize the
related premium on an accelerated basis. In
addition, we will have to reinvest the greater amounts of prepayments in that lower rate environment, thereby affecting future yields on our assets. If we purchase assets at a discount to
par value, and borrowers prepay their mortgage loans
slower than expected, the decrease in corresponding prepayments may reduce the expected yield on assets because we will not be able to accrete the related discount as quickly as
originally anticipated.
We attempt to reduce the exposure of our MSRs to voluntary prepayments through the structuring of recapture agreements with Aurora’s subservicers. Under these agreements, the
subservicer attempts
to refinance specified mortgage loans. The subservicer sells the new mortgage loan to the applicable Agency, transfers the related MSR to Aurora and then subservices the new mortgage loan on behalf of Aurora. See
“Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 7. Transactions with Related Parties” for information regarding Aurora’s recapture agreements.
We have elected the fair value option to record our investments in MSRs in order to provide users of our consolidated financial statements with better information regarding the
effects of prepayment
risk and other market factors on the MSRs. Under this election, we record a valuation adjustment on our investments in MSRs on a quarterly basis to recognize the changes in fair value of our MSRs in net income as
described below. Although
transactions in MSRs are observable in the marketplace, the valuation includes unobservable market data inputs (prepayment speeds, delinquency levels, costs to service and discount rates). The change in fair
value of MSRs is recorded within “Unrealized gain (loss)
on investments in Servicing Related Assets” on the consolidated statements of income (loss). Fair value is generally determined by discounting the expected future cash flows
using discount rates that incorporate the market risks and liquidity
premium specific to the MSRs and, therefore, may differ from their effective yields. In determining the valuation of MSRs, management uses internally developed
pricing models that are based on certain unobservable market-based inputs. The Company
classifies these valuations as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. For additional information on our fair value methodology, see “Item 8.
Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 9. Fair Value.”
We finance the acquisition of our RMBS for our portfolio through repurchase transactions under master repurchase agreements. Repurchase transactions are treated as collateralized financing
financing transactions and are carried at their contractual amounts as specified in the respective transactions. Accrued interest payable is included in “Accrued expenses and other liabilities” on the consolidated balance sheets.
Securities financed
through repurchase transactions remain on our consolidated balance sheet as an asset and cash received from the purchaser is recorded on our consolidated balance sheetsheets as a liability. Interest paid in accordance
with repurchase transactions is
recorded in interest expense on the consolidated statements of income (loss).
Interest income for the year ended December 31, 20242025 was $55.8$61.1 million as compared to $50.0$55.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The $5.8$5.3 million increase in interest income
for the year
ended December 31, 20242025 as compared to the year ended December 31, 20232024 was due to purchases of new securities, an increase in price premium amortization as well as replacing lower yielding securities with higher yielding securities coupled with portfolio
positioning.securities.
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 20242025 was $55.7$49.8 million as compared to $51.6$55.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The $4.1$6.0 million increasedecrease in interest
expense for the year
ended December 31, 20242025 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023,2024 was primarily due to a risedecrease in repurchasefinancing obligations.rates combined with a decrease in notes payable.
Servicing costs for the year ended December 31, 20242025 were $12.4$9.3 million as compared to $11.2$12.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The $1.2$3.1 million increasedecrease in servicing costs
for the year
ended December 31, 20242025 as compared to the year ended December 31, 20232024 was primarily due to changes in the portfolio and a one-time loan level adjustmentsadjustment as well as de-boarding fees related to the MSR sale.sale during the year ended December 31,
2024.
Realized gain on investments in MSRs for the year ended December 31, 20242025 was approximately $504,000$0 as compared to $0$0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The increasedecrease of $504,000
$0.5 million in realized gain on MSRs
was because no MSRs were sold during the year ended December 31, 2023.2025.
Realized gain on derivatives for the year ended December 31, 20242025 was $21.3$7.0 million as compared to $33.8$21.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The $12.5$14.3 million decrease in
realized gain on
derivatives for the year ended December 31, 20242025 as compared to December 31, 20232024 was substantially comprised of a decrease of $13.4 million in interest income on interest rate swaps and an increase of $24.7$5.5 million in losses on interest rate
swaps, offset by a decrease of $1.8 million in losses on TBAs and a decrease of $1.4 million in interest income on
interest rate swaps, offset by a decrease of $9.2 million in losses on interest rate swaps and a decrease of $4.3$2.8 million in losses on U.S. Treasury futures.futures due to changes in interest rates as well as composition of derivatives.
Unrealized lossgain on RMBS measured at fair value through earnings for the year ended December 31, 20242025 was $19.4$35.6 million as compared to a gainloss of $9.8$19.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2023.2024. The
increase of $29.2$55.0 million in unrealized lossgain on RMBS measured at fair value through earnings was due to a risedrop in interest rates during the year.period combined with spread tightening.
Unrealized gainloss on derivatives for the year ended December 31, 20242025 was $9.8$39.8 million as compared to a lossgain of $43.1$9.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The $52.9$49.6 million
decrease increase in
unrealized loss on derivatives for the year ended December 31, 20242025 as compared to December 31, 20232024 was primarily due to changes in interest rates and the composition of our derivatives relative to the prior year.
Unrealized loss on our investments in Servicing Related Assets for the year ended December 31, 20242025 was $7.2$18.8 million as compared to $25.9$7.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.
2024. The $18.7 $11.6
million decreaseincrease in unrealized loss on our investments in Servicing Related Assets for December 31, 20242025 as compared to December 31, 20232024 was primarily due to changes in valuation inputs or assumptions.assumptions and paydown of underlying loans.
General and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 20242025 was $10.7$7.7 million as compared to $6.4$10.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The $4.3$3.0 million increase
decrease in general and
administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 20242025 as compared to the year ended December 31, 20232024 was primarily due to ana increasedecrease in professional fees relatingrelated to the Internalization.
Compensation and benefits expense for the year ended December 31, 20242025 was $1.6$6.5 million as compared to $466,000$1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The $1.1$4.9 million increase in
compensation and
benefits expense for the year ended December 31, 20242025 as compared to the year ended December 31, 20232024 was because, effective as of November 14, 2024, the Company started operating as an internally managed Company.
Management Fee to Affiliate
Management fee to affiliate for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $0 as compared to $6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The $6.0 million decrease in management fee to affiliate for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024 was due to the Internalization of the Company.
Our GAAP equity changes as the values of our RMBS are marked to market each quarter, among other factors. The primary causes of mark to market changes are changes in interest rates
and nominal
spreads. spreads.During the year ended December 31, 2025, a drop in interest rates caused a net unrealized gain on our available-for-sale RMBS. During the year ended December 31, 2024, a rise in interest rates caused a net unrealized loss on our
available-for-sale RMBS. During the year ended December 31, 2023, tightening of credit spreads and an interest
rate rally in the 5-year U.S. Treasury rate caused a net unrealized gain on our available-for-sale RMBS, which was chiefly driven by the interest and mortgage rate rally that occurred in the fourth quarter of the year and positioning
of securities. Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale RMBS is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
EAD for the year ended December 31, 20242025 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023,2024, decreasedincreased by approximately $6.3$3.7 million or $0.30 per average common share. Approximately
$3.9 million of this or $0.13$0.06 per average common share wasdue dueprimarily to internalizationa costs.decrease Thein
Internalization remainingexpenses varianceas waswell primarilyas duea to changesdecrease in interestborrowing rates.costs offset by an increase in common share count resulting from issuances under the Common Stock ATM program.
Our primary uses of funds are the payment of interest, managementcompensation fees,and benefits, outstanding commitments, other operating expenses, investments in new or replacement assets, margin calls and
the repayment
of borrowings, as well as dividends. Although we continue to maintain a higher level of unrestricted cash than prior to the pandemic, we expect to invest more of that unrestricted cash in our targeted assets if
normalization of the economy
continues. We may also use capital resources to repurchase additional shares of common stock under our stock repurchase program when we believe such repurchases are appropriate and/or the stock is trading
at a significant discount to net asset
value. We seek to maintain adequate cash reserves and other sources of available liquidity to meet any margin calls resulting from decreases in value related to a reasonably possible (in the
opinion of management) change in interest rates.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had repurchase agreements with 35multiple counterparties and approximately $1,077.3$1,137.2 million of outstanding repurchase agreement borrowings from 1216 of those
counterparties, which were
used to finance RMBS. As of December 31, 2024,2025, our exposure (defined as the amount of cash and securities pledged as collateral, less the borrowing under the repurchase agreement) to any of the
counterparties under the repurchase agreements
did not exceed five percent of the Company’s equity. Under these agreements, which are uncommitted facilities, we sell a security to a counterparty and concurrently agree to repurchase
the same security at a later date at the same price
that we initially sold the security plus the interest charged. The sale price represents financing proceeds and the difference between the sale and repurchase prices represents
interest on the financing. The price at which the security is
sold generally represents the market value of the security less a discount or “haircut.” The weighted average haircut on our repurchase debt at December 31, 20242025 was
approximately 4.4%. During the term of the repurchase transaction, which
can be as short as a few days, the counterparty holds the security and posts margin as collateral. The counterparty monitors and calculates what it estimates to
be the value of the collateral during the term of the transaction. If this
value declines by more than a de minimis threshold, the counterparty requires us to post additional collateral (or “margin”) in order to maintain the initial
haircut on the collateral. This margin is typically required to be posted in the
form of cash and cash equivalents. Furthermore, we are, from time to time, a party to derivative agreements or financing arrangements that may be subject
to margin calls based on the value of such instruments.
These short-term borrowings were used to finance certain of our investments in RMBS. The RMBS repurchase agreements are guaranteed by the Company. The weighted average difference
between the market value of the
assets and the face amount of available financing for the RMBS repurchase agreements, or the haircut, was 4.4% as of December 31, 20242025 and 4.3% December 31, 2023.2024. The following tables provide additional
information regarding borrowings under our
repurchase agreements (dollars in thousands):
Freddie Mac MSR Revolver. In July 2018, the Company, Aurora and QRS V (collectively with Aurora and the Company, the “Borrowers”) entered into a
$25.0 million revolving
credit facility (the “Freddie Mac MSR Revolver”) pursuant to which Aurora pledged all of its existing and future MSRs on loans owned or securitized by Freddie Mac. On April 2, 2019, Aurora and QRS V entered
into an amendment that increased
the maximum amount of the Freddie Mac MSR Revolver to $100.0 million. In JulyJune 2024,2025, the Borrowers entered into an amendment that extended the revolving period for an additional 364 days with the
Borrowers’ option for two renewals for
similar terms followed by a one-year term out feature with a 24-month amortization schedule. Amounts borrowed bear interest at a weighted average borrowing rate of 8.1%.7.1%. At December 31, 20242025 and
December 31, 2023,2024, approximately $56.5 $55.5
million and $64.5$56.5 million, respectively, was outstanding under the Freddie Mac MSR Revolver.
Fannie Mae MSR Revolving Facility. In October 2021, Aurora and QRS III entered into the Fannie Mae MSR Revolving Facility, pursuant to which Aurora
and QRS III pledged
their respective rights in all existing and future MSRs for loans owned or securitized by Fannie Mae to secure borrowings outstanding from time to time. The original maximum credit amount outstanding at any one time under
the Fannie Mae MSR
Revolving Facility iswas $150.0 million. The revolving period is 24 months which may be extended by agreement with the lender. In October 2023, Aurora and QRS III entered into an amendment to the Fannie Mae MSR
Revolving Facility that
extended the revolving period for an additional 24 months. In October 2025, Aurora and QRS III entered into an amendment to the Fannie Mae MSR which (i) extended the revolving period by an additional 24 months, and (ii) reduced the credit
amount to $100 million, with the option for Aurora and QRS III to increase the maximum credit to $150 million at any time during the extended 24-month revolving period. The revolving period may be further extended by a period of 1-year by
agreement with the lender. Amounts borrowed bear interest at a weighted average borrowing rate of 7.9%.7.0%. At the end of the revolving period, the outstanding amount will be
converted to a three-year term loan that will bear interest at a rate
calculated at a spread over the rate for one-year interest rate swaps. The Company has guaranteed repayment of all indebtedness under the Fannie Mae MSR Revolving
Facility. At December 31, 20242025 and December 31, 2023,2024, approximately $95.6 $90.8
million and $106.0$95.6 million, respectively, was outstanding under the Fannie Mae MSR Revolving Facility.
Our operating activities provided cash of approximately $19.1 million and used cash of approximately $4.7 million and provided cash of approximately $40.7 million for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and December 31, 2023,
2024, respectively. Our investing
activities used cash of approximately $141.3$66.7 million and $104.1$141.3 million for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and December 31, 2023,2024, respectively. The cash used by our investing activities during the years
ended December 31, 20242025 and
December 31, 20232024 primarily resulted from RMBS purchases offset by RMBS sales and principal paydowns of RMBS.RMBS and payments for settlements of derivatives.
We make distributions based on a number of factors, including an estimate of taxable earnings. Dividends distributed and taxable income will typically differ from GAAP earnings due to
items such as fair value
adjustments, differences in premium amortization and discount accretion, and nondeductible general and administrative expenses. Our common dividend per share may be substantially different than our taxable
earnings and GAAP earnings per
share. Our GAAP loss per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $0.09 and our GAAP income per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $0.07 and our GAAP loss per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $1.70.$0.07.
Our contractual obligations as of December 31, 20242025 and December 31, 20232024 included repurchase
agreements, borrowings under our MSR financing arrangements, our Management Agreement with our Manager, and our subservicing agreements.
Management Agreement
The Management Agreement with CHMM, which was terminated on November 14, 2024, provided that CHMM was entitled to receive a management fee, the reimbursement of certain expenses and,
in certain circumstances, a termination fee. The management fee was an amount equal to 1.5% per annum of stockholders’ equity, adjusted as set forth in the Management Agreement, and calculated and payable quarterly in arrears. In
certain circumstances, we were required to pay CHMM a termination fee equal to three times the average annual management fee earned by CHMM during the two four-quarter periods ending as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal
quarter prior to the effective date of the termination. Such termination fee was required to be paid upon termination or non-renewal of the Management Agreement by us without cause or by CHMM if we materially breached the Management
Agreement. The Management Agreement was terminated without payment of any termination fee in connection with our consummation of an internalization event (as defined in the Management Agreement), effective as of November 14, 2024.
We paid all of our direct operating expenses, except those specifically required to be borne by CHMM under the Management Agreement. CHMM was responsible for all costs incident to the
performance of its duties under the Management Agreement. We believe that CHMM used the proceeds from its management fee in part to pay the Services Provider for services provided under the Services Agreement. Our officers received no
cash compensation directly from us. CHMM provided us with our officers. CHMM was entitled to be reimbursed for an agreed upon portion of the costs of the wages, salary and other benefits with respect to our CFO, and, prior to January
1, 2022, our general counsel, originally based on the percentages of their working time and efforts spent on matters related to the Company. The amount of the wages, salary and benefits reimbursed with respect to the officers CHMM
provided to us was subject to the approval of the compensation committee of our board of directors.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, Aurora had four subservicing agreements in place,place. one of which is with Freedom Mortgage. Following the sale of the Ginnie Mae MSRs to Freedom Mortgage in June
2020, Freedom Mortgage continued to subservice certain loans that had been purchased from Ginnie Mae pools due to delinquency or default. Freedom Mortgage ceased subservicing these loans during 2021 because these loans and any related
advance claims had been rehabilitated or liquidated. One of the other subservicingThe agreements is with RoundPoint Mortgage Servicing Corporation (“RoundPoint”). Freedom Mortgage acquired RoundPoint and it became a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Freedom Mortgage in August 2020. On September 30, 2023, RoundPoint ceased being a wholly owned subsidiary of Freedom Mortgage when it was acquired by an unaffiliated entity, Matrix Financial Services Corporation. The
agreementseach have varyingtwo-year initial terms (three years, for Freedom Mortgage, and two years for the other three sub-servicers) and are subject to automatic renewal for additional terms equal
to the applicable initial term unless either
party chooses not to renew. Each agreement may be terminated without cause by either party by giving notice as specified in the agreement. If an agreement is not renewed by the Company or
terminated by the Company without cause,
de-boarding fees will be due to the subservicer. Under each agreement, the subservicer agrees to service the applicable mortgage loans in accordance with applicable law and the requirements of the
applicable Agency and the Company
pays customary fees to the applicable subservicer for specified services. All expiring agreements to date have been automatically renewed for the extended terms.
Joint Marketing Recapture Agreement
We attempt to reduce the exposure of our MSRs to voluntary prepayments through the structuring of recapture agreements with Aurora’s subservicers.
In May 2018, Aurora entered into a recapture purchase and sale agreement with RoundPoint, one of Aurora’s subservicers and from August 2020 to September 2023, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Freedom Mortgage. Pursuant to this agreement, RoundPoint attempts to refinance certain mortgage loans underlying Aurora’s MSR portfolio subserviced by RoundPoint as directed by Aurora. If a loan is refinanced, RoundPoint
will sell the loan to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, as applicable, retain the sale proceeds and transfer the related MSR to Aurora. During the period where RoundPoint was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Freedom Mortgage, RoundPoint
outsourced such recapture services to Freedom Mortgage on RoundPoint’s behalf.
Substantially all of our assets and liabilities are financial in nature. As a result, interest rates and other factors affect our performance more so than inflation, although inflation
inflation rates can often have a meaningful influence over the direction of interest rates. As discussed above under “—Effects of Federal Reserve Policy on the Company”, since September 2025, the Federal Reserve has been reducingreduced its federal funds rate
target by 75 basis points to a range of 3.50% to 3.75% due to slowing job growth and otherwiseincreased easingunemployment. To the extent the Federal Reserve decides to further ease monetary policypolicy, based on improved inflation data. The Federal Reserve’sits actions may decrease interest rates across asset
classes and our interest expense and, thereby, increase our interest income. If the
Federal Reserve decides to tighten monetary policy in the future,however, it may increase our interest expense, which expense may not be fully offset by any resulting
increase in our interest income. Furthermore, our financial statements are
prepared in accordance with GAAP and our distributions are determined by our board of directors primarily based on our REIT taxable income, and, in each case, our
activities and balance sheet are measured with reference to historical
cost and/or fair market value without considering inflation.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
New heading “Risks Related to the Pending Mergers”
New heading “The exchange ratio is fixed and will not be adjusted in the event of any change to MITT’s stock price or our stock price.”
New heading “Completion of the Mergers is subject to a number of conditions, some or all of which may not be satisfied, or completed on a timely basis, if at all. Failure to complete the Mergers could have material adverse effects on our business.”
New heading “The pendency of the Mergers could adversely affect our businesses and operations.”
New heading “The Merger Agreement contains provisions that could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us or could result in any competing proposal being at a lower price than it might otherwise be.”
New heading “Even if we complete the Mergers, the combined company may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the Mergers.”
Largest changes
“Completion of the Mergers is subject to a number of conditions, some or all of which may not be satisfied, or completed on a timely basis, if at all. Failure to complete the Mergers could have material adverse effects on our business.”see in full comparison
“The Merger Agreement contains provisions that could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us or could result in any competing proposal being at a lower price than it might otherwise be.”see in full comparison
“The exchange ratio is fixed and will not be adjusted in the event of any change to MITT’s stock price or our stock price.”see in full comparison
“Even if we complete the Mergers, the combined company may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the Mergers.”see in full comparison
“The pendency of the Mergers could adversely affect our businesses and operations.”see in full comparison
“In connection with the pendency of the Mergers, it is possible that some counterparties, servicers, lenders and other persons with whom we have a business relationship may delay or defer certain business decisions or might decide to seek to terminate, change or renegotiate their relationships with us, as the case may be, as a result of the Mergers or otherwise, which could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flows, as well as the market price of our common stock, regardless of whether the Mergers are completed. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (22)
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the reader should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes in the Company's risk factors from those disclosed in Part I, Item 1A, of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025.
Risks Related to the Pending Mergers
The exchange ratio is fixed and will not be adjusted in the event of any change to MITT’s stock price or our stock price.
As a result of the Mergers, each share of our common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Company Merger (other than Cancelled Shares) will convert into the right to receive a fixed combination of stock and cash, consisting of (A) from MITT, (i) that number of validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable shares of MITT Common Stock equal to 0.3063x, and (ii) $0.41 per share in cash, without interest, and (B) from MITT Manager, $0.52 per share in cash. The 0.3063x exchange ratio is fixed and will not be adjusted to reflect changes in MITT’s stock price or our stock price.
Changes in MITT’s stock price prior to the Mergers will affect the market value of the consideration that our common stockholders will be entitled to receive at the effective time of the Company Merger. Stock price changes may result from a variety of factors (many of which are beyond the control of us and MITT), including the following factors:
MITT’s stock price at the closing of the Mergers may vary from its price on the date the Merger Agreement was executed. As a result, the market value of the MITT common stock that our stockholders will receive pursuant to the Merger Agreement will also vary. If the price of MITT’s common stock declines between the date the Merger Agreement was signed and the closing of the Mergers, including for any of the reasons described above, our common stockholders will receive MITT common stock that has a market value upon completion of the Mergers that is less than the market value of such shares calculated pursuant to the exchange ratio on the date the Merger Agreement was signed.
Therefore, since the number of shares of MITT common stock issuable pursuant to the Merger Agreement is fixed, our common stockholders cannot be sure of the market value of the MITT common stock they will receive upon consummation of the Mergers.
Completion of the Mergers is subject to a number of conditions, some or all of which may not be satisfied, or completed on a timely basis, if at all. Failure to complete the Mergers could have material adverse effects on our business.
The completion of the Mergers are subject to a number of conditions, including, among other things, the approval of each of CHMI’s and MITT’s stockholders, the effectiveness of a registration statement on Form S-4 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the listing on the NYSE of the MITT common stock and the MITT preferred stock issuable in the Merger, and the receipt of certain regulatory approvals, which make the completion and timing of the Mergers uncertain. The failure to satisfy any or all of the required conditions could delay the completion of the Mergers for a significant period of time or prevent them from occurring at all. There can be no assurance that the conditions precedent to the completion of the Mergers will be satisfied or waived, or that the Merger will be completed.
If the Mergers are not completed, we may be materially adversely affected and, without realizing any of the benefits of having completed the Mergers, will be subject to a number of risks, including the following:
In addition, if the Mergers are not completed, we could be subject to litigation related to any failure to complete the Mergers or related to any enforcement proceeding commenced against us to perform our obligations under the Merger Agreement. Any of these risks could materially and adversely impact our ongoing business, financial condition, financial results and stock price.
Similarly, delays in the completion of the Mergers could, among other things, result in additional transaction costs, loss of revenue or other negative effects associated with delay and uncertainty about completion of the Mergers and could materially and adversely impact our ongoing business, financial condition, financial results and stock price following the completion of the Mergers.
In addition, if the Merger Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances specified therein, we may be required to pay MITT a termination fee equal to 4.0% of our equity value.
The pendency of the Mergers could adversely affect our businesses and operations.
In connection with the pendency of the Mergers, it is possible that some counterparties, servicers, lenders and other persons with whom we have a business relationship may delay or defer certain business decisions or might decide to seek to terminate, change or renegotiate their relationships with us, as the case may be, as a result of the Mergers or otherwise, which could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flows, as well as the market price of our common stock, regardless of whether the Mergers are completed. Similarly, our employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles with the combined company following the Mergers, which may adversely affect our ability to attract and retain key personnel during the pendency of the Mergers. In addition, due to covenants in the Merger Agreement, we may be unable (without MITT’s prior written consent), during the pendency of the Mergers, to undertake certain business activities, including our ability in certain cases to modify or terminate contracts, acquire or dispose of assets, incur indebtedness, issue equity securities, incur capital expenditures or settle claims. In addition, our quarterly dividends on common stock are capped at $0.10 per share during the pendency of the Mergers. Such limitations could adversely affect our business and operations prior to the completion of the Mergers.
The Merger Agreement contains provisions that could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us or could result in any competing proposal being at a lower price than it might otherwise be.
We are subject to certain restrictions on our ability to solicit alternative acquisition proposals from third parties, to enter into an acquisition agreement with respect to an alternative acquisition proposal and to participate in discussions or negotiations with or provide non-public information to any person relating to an alternative acquisition proposal, subject to customary exceptions. In addition, we may be required to pay MITT a termination fee equal to 4.0% of our equity value under specified circumstances.
Notwithstanding these restrictions, prior to obtaining the approval of our stockholders, under specified circumstances, our board of directors may change its recommendation of the Mergers, and we may also terminate the Merger Agreement to enter into an acquisition agreement with respect to a superior proposal upon payment of the termination fee described above.
These provisions could make it more difficult for a third party that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant part of us from considering or proposing such an acquisition, even if we were prepared to pay consideration with a higher per-share cash or market value than the market value proposed to be received in the Mergers, or might result in a potential competing acquirer proposing to pay a lower price than it might otherwise have proposed to pay because of the added expense of the termination fee that may become payable in specified circumstances under the Merger Agreement.
Even if we complete the Mergers, the combined company may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the Mergers.
No assurance can be given that the anticipated benefits, synergies, growth, profitability, cash flow generation and earnings accretion of the Mergers will be realized by the combined company or, if realized, may be realized more slowly than expected. Further, inherent in transactions such as these are the risks relating to the integration of the two businesses, including the combination of two mortgage REIT portfolios and related operations.
There have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth under the heading “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2025.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Realized Gain on Investments in MSRs, Net”
New heading “Credit Loss and Impairment on Other Assets”
Largest changes
Since September 2025, the Federal Reserve has reduced its federal funds rate target by a cumulative 75 basis points to a range of 3.50% tosee in full comparison3.75%3.75%.dueDuringtotheslowingfirstjobhalfgrowthofand2026,increased unemployment. Even though inflation remains above its 2 percent target,the FederalReserveOpenhasMarketdeterminedCommitteethatmaintained a target range at 3.50% to 3.75%, citing continued moderation inevaluatinginflation,itsadualsoftermandatelabor market, and uncertainty regarding thedownsideeconomicrisks to employment have risen.outlook.
“Credit loss and impairment on other assets was approximately $2.8 million for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2026. The increase of $2.8 million was due to the recognition of credit loss and impairment charges taken in the second quarter of 2026 on certain strategic investments and related receivables following management’s assessment of their estimated recoverable values.”see in full comparison
To the extent the Federal Reserve takes future action to ease monetary policy by reducing its federal funds rate and/or purchasing securities and increasing its balance sheet, itsee in full comparisonitwill generally lower interest rates across asset classes, including for Agency RMBS. Lower rates could reduce our funding costs and spur economic activity, increasing our net interest income. Higher prepayment could reduce the length of cash flows from the MSRs and accelerate the premium amortization on the RMBS portfolio.In the event that the Federal Reserve reverses course and tightens monetary policy in the future by increasing the federal funds rate and/or selling securities and reducing its balance sheet, these actions could result in higher interest rates, including for Agency RMBS, and reduce economic activity in the United States, as well as decrease spreads on interest rates, which can reduce our net interest income and increase our funding costs. They may also negatively impact our results as we have certain assets and liabilities that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. In addition, lower net interest income resulting from higher rates is partially offset by lower prepayments which extends the length of cash flows from the MSRs and slows the premium amortization on the RMBS portfolio.
“Conversely, if the Federal Reserve tightens monetary policy in the future by increasing the federal funds rate and/or selling securities and reducing its balance sheet, these actions could result in higher interest rates, including for Agency RMBS, and reduce economic activity in the United States, as well as decrease spreads on interest rates, which can reduce our net interest income and increase our funding costs. They may also negatively impact our results as we have certain assets and liabilities that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (70)
We conduct substantially all of our operations and own substantially all of our assets through our Operating Partnership. We are the sole general partner of our Operating
Partnership. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we owned 98.5% of our Operating Partnership. Our Operating Partnership, in turn, owns all of the outstanding common stock of CHMI Sub-REIT, Inc. (the “Sub-REIT”). The Sub-REIT has elected to be taxed as a REIT
under the Code commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 2020.
Pursuant to the Company’s Common Stock ATM Program, the Company may offer and sell through one or more sales agents, up to $150.0 million in shares of its common stock at
prices prices
prevailing at the time, subject to volume and other regulatory limitations. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, approximately $34.6 million was remaining pursuant to the Common Stock ATM Program. During the three-monththree periodand six-month periods ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026,
the Company
did not issue or sell any shares pursuant to the Common Stock ATM Program. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company issued and sold 4,909,053 shares of common stock under the Common Stock ATM Program. The shares were sold at
a a
weighted average price of $3.00 per share for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $14.7 million before fees of approximately $293,000.
Prior to January 29, 2024, the Company had an at-the-market offering program for its Series A Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Series A ATM Program”) pursuant to which it could
offer and sell through one or more sales agents up to $35.0 million in shares of its Series A Preferred Stock at prices prevailing at the time, subject to volume and other regulatory limitations. The Company terminated the Preferred Series A ATM
Program effective as of January 29, 2024.
In September 2019, the Company initiated a share repurchase program that allows for the repurchase of up to an aggregate of $10.0 million of its common stock. As of MarchJune 31,30,
2026, approximately $4.7 million was remaining under the share repurchase program. Shares may be repurchased from time to time through privately negotiated transactions or open market transactions, pursuant to a trading plan in accordance with
Rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act, or by any combination of such methods. The manner, price, number and timing of share repurchases are subject to a variety of factors, including market conditions and applicable SEC rules.
The share repurchase program does not require the purchase of any minimum number of shares, and, subject to SEC rules, purchases may be commenced or suspended at any time without prior notice. During the three-monththree periodand six-month periods ended MarchJune 31,30,
2026 2026
and the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company did not repurchase any common stock pursuant to the repurchase program.
In December 2023, the Company initiated a preferred stock repurchase program that allows for the repurchase of up to an aggregate of $50.0 million of its shares of preferred
stock. Shares of preferred stock may be repurchased from time to time through privately negotiated transactions or open market transactions, pursuant to a trading plan in accordance with Rules 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act. The manner, price,
number and timing of share repurchases are subject to a variety of factors, including market conditions and applicable SEC rules. The preferred stock repurchase program does not require the purchase of any minimum number of shares of preferred
stock, and, subject to SEC rules, purchases may be commenced or suspended at any time without prior notice. During the three-monththree periodand six-month periods ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company did not repurchase any
Preferred Preferred
Stock pursuant to the repurchase program. Shares of preferred stock that are repurchased by the Company cease to be outstanding but remain authorized for future issuance.
Since September 2025, the Federal Reserve has reduced its federal funds rate target by a cumulative 75 basis points to a range of 3.50% to 3.75%3.75%. dueDuring tothe slowingfirst jobhalf growthof and2026,
increased unemployment. Even though inflation remains above its 2 percent target, the Federal ReserveOpen hasMarket determinedCommittee thatmaintained a target range at 3.50% to 3.75%, citing continued moderation in evaluatinginflation, itsa dualsofter mandatelabor market, and uncertainty regarding the downsideeconomic risks to employment have risen.outlook.
As ofEffective December 1, 2025, the Federal Reserve has also ceased reducing its balance sheet. Since 2022, the Federal Reserve had been allowing a set amount of Treasury securities and
Agency RMBS on its balance sheet to roll off each month without reinvestment. Prior to December 1, 2025, the Federal Reserve’s monthly redemption cap on U.S. Treasury Securities was $5 billion and its redemption cap on agency debt/MBS was $35
billion with excess principal payments reinvested in U.S. Treasury securities.
On May 13, 2026, the U.S. Senate confirmed Kevin Warsh to serve as Chairman of the Federal Reserve. Mr. Warsh succeeded Jerome Powell upon the expiration of Mr. Powell’s term as Chair in May 2026, although Mr. Powell remains a member of the Board of Governors, with his term extending into 2028. A change in Federal Reserve leadership may result in actual or perceived shifts in monetary policy priorities and could contribute to increased volatility in interest rates and financial markets.
Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell’s current four-year term as Chair expires on May 15, 2026, although his term as a member of the Board of Governors extends through early 2028. President Donald Trump has nominated Kevin Warsh as Jerome Powell’s successor, but as of mid-April 2026, the Senate had yet to vote on Mr. Warsh’s confirmation. Any uncertainty surrounding the confirmation process may contribute to continued instability in financial markets. Additionally, future or perceived shifts in monetary policy priorities associated with a change in Federal Reserve leadership could increase interest rate volitivity and impact financial conditions.
To the extent the Federal Reserve takes future action to ease monetary policy by reducing its federal funds rate and/or purchasing securities and increasing its balance sheet,
it it
will generally lower interest rates across asset classes, including for Agency RMBS. Lower rates could reduce our funding costs and spur economic activity, increasing our net interest income. Higher prepayment could reduce the length of cash
flows from the MSRs and accelerate the premium amortization on the RMBS portfolio. In the event that the Federal Reserve reverses course and tightens monetary policy in the future by increasing the federal funds rate and/or selling securities and
reducing its balance sheet, these actions could result in higher interest rates, including for Agency RMBS, and reduce economic activity in the United States, as well as decrease spreads on interest rates, which can reduce our net interest income
and increase our funding costs. They may also negatively impact our results as we have certain assets and liabilities that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. In addition, lower net interest income resulting from higher rates is partially
offset by lower prepayments which extends the length of cash flows from the MSRs and slows the premium amortization on the RMBS portfolio.
Conversely, if the Federal Reserve tightens monetary policy in the future by increasing the federal funds rate and/or selling securities and reducing its balance sheet, these actions could result in higher interest rates, including for Agency RMBS, and reduce economic activity in the United States, as well as decrease spreads on interest rates, which can reduce our net interest income and increase our funding costs. They may also negatively impact our results as we have certain assets and liabilities that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. In addition, lower net interest income resulting from higher rates is partially offset by lower prepayments which extends the length of cash flows from the MSRs and slows the premium amortization on the RMBS portfolio.
Interest income for the three-month period ended March 31, 2026 was $15.9 million as compared to $15.8 million for the three-month period ended December 31, 2025. The change in interest income
was nominal.
Interest income for the three-month period ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $15.9$14.7 million as compared to $14.8$15.9 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2025.2026. The increase decrease
of $1.1$1.2 million in
interest income was due to purchasesthe sale of new securities asand wellan asincrease replacingin lowerprice yieldingpremium securities with higher yielding securities.amortization.
Interest income for the six-month period ended June 30, 2026 was $30.6 million as compared to $29.6 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2025. The increase of $1.0 million in interest income was primarily attributable to higher yields earned on the portfolio, resulting from the reinvestment of principal proceeds into higher-coupon securities and the replacement of lower-yielding investments with securities generating higher interest income.
Interest expense for the three-month period ended March 31, 2026 was $11.4 million as compared to $12.6 million for the three-month period ended December 31, 2025. The decrease of $1.2 million
in interest expense was due to a decrease in financing rates.
Interest expense for the three-month period ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $11.4$10.0 million as compared to $12.6$11.4 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2025.2026. The decrease
of $1.2$1.4 million in
interest expense was due to a decreasechanges in financingthe rates.Company’s leverage.
Interest expense for the six-month period ended June 30, 2026 was $21.4 million as compared to $24.8 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2025. The decrease of $3.4 million in interest expense was due to a decrease in financing rates combined with a decrease in notes payable.
Servicing fee income for the three-month period ended March 31, 2026 was $10.2 million as compared to $10.6 million for the three-month period ended December 31, 2025. The decrease of $0.4
million in servicing fee income was due to changes in the size of the portfolio.
Servicing fee income for the three-month period ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $10.2$9.7 million as compared to $11.0$10.2 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2025.2026. The
decrease of $0.8$0.5 million
in servicing fee income was due to changes in the size of the portfolio.
Servicing fee income for the six-month period ended June 30, 2026 was $19.9 million as compared to $21.9 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2025. The decrease of $2.0 million in servicing fee income was due to changes in the size of the portfolio.
Servicing costs for each of the three-month periods ended June 30, 2026 and March 31, 2026 was $2.3 million. The change was nominal.
Servicing costs for the three-month period ended March 31, 2026 were $2.3 million as compared to $2.5 million for the three-month period ended December 31, 2025. The decrease of $0.2 million in
servicing costs was due to changes in the size of the portfolio.
Servicing costs for the three-monthsix-month period ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 were $2.3$4.6 million as compared to $2.5$4.5 million for the three-monthsix-month period ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The decrease of $0.2 million in
servicing costschange was due to changes in the size of the portfolio.
nominal.
Realized loss on RMBS for each of the three-month periods ended March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025 was $0 because no RMBS securities were sold.
Realized loss on RMBS for the three-month period ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $0approximately $1.0 million as compared to $4.0 million$0 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2025.2026. The decrease
increase of $4.0$1.0 million in
realized loss on RMBS was becausedue noto the timing and volume of RMBS securities were sold during the three-month period ended March 31, 2026.sales.
Realized loss on RMBS for the six-month period ended June 30, 2026 was approximately $1.0 million as compared to $6.0 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2025. The decrease of $5.0 million in realized loss on RMBS was due to the timing and volume of RMBS sales.
Realized Gain on Investments in MSRs, Net
Realized gain on investments in MSRs for each of the three-month periods ended June 30, 2026 and March 31, 2026 was $0 because no MSRs were sold during these periods.
Realized gain on investments in MSRs for each of the six-month periods ended June 30, 2026 and June 30, 2025 was $0 because no MSRs were sold during these periods.
Realized lossgain on derivatives for the three-month period ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was approximately $70$12.1 thousandmillion as compared to $1.9a million$70 thousand realized loss on derivatives for the
three-month period ended DecemberMarch 31, 2025.2026. The
decrease increase of $1.8$12.2 million in realized lossgain on derivatives was substantially comprised of aan decreaseincrease of $0.4$8.1 million in lossesgains on TBAsTBAs, andan a decreaseincrease of $2.1$2.6 million in lossesgain on U.S. Treasury futuresfutures, offset by and
an increase of $1.6 million in losses of $0.1
milliongain on Eris SOFR swap futures andoffset by a decrease of $0.6$69 millionthousand in interest rate swaps periodic interest income due to changes in interest rates as well as the composition of derivatives.
Realized lossgain on derivatives for the three-monthsix-month period ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was approximately $70$12.1 thousandmillion as compared to a realized gain on derivatives of $4.6$19.5 million for the three-month
six-month period ended MarchJune 31, 30,
2025. The decrease of $4.7$7.4 million in realized gain on derivatives was substantially comprised of ana increasedecrease of $3.0$5.3 million in lossesgains on TBAs, ana increase in losses on Eris SOFR swap futures of $0.1 million, and a
decrease of $2.7$1.2 million in gains on U.S. Treasury futures, and a decrease of $3.5 million in
interest rate swaps periodic interest income offset by a decrease of $1.1 million in losses on U.S. Treasury futures due to changes in interest rates as well as the composition of derivatives.derivatives offset by an increase of $1.2 million in gains on interest rate swaps and an increase of $1.4 million in gains on Eris SOFR swap
futures.
Unrealized loss on RMBS measured at fair value through earnings for the three-month period ended March 31, 2026 was $12.4 million as compared to an unrealized gain on RMBS measured at fair
value through earnings of $6.6 million for the three-month period ended December 31, 2025. The decrease of $19.0 million in unrealized gain on RMBS measured at fair value through earnings was due to an increase in interest rates during the
quarter.
Unrealized loss on RMBS measured at fair value through earnings for the three-month period ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $12.4$0.9 million as compared to an unrealized gain on RMBS measured at fair
value through earnings of $14.8$12.4 million for the
three-month period ended March 31, 2025.2026. The decrease of $27.2$11.5 million in unrealized gainloss on RMBS measured at fair value through earnings was duea toresult anof increasechanges in interest rates andcombined nominal
with spread widening during the quarter.tightening.
Unrealized loss on RMBS measured at fair value through earnings for the six-month period ended June 30, 2026 was $13.3 million, compared to an unrealized gain of $18.3 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2025. The $31.6 million unfavorable change was primarily due to an increase in interest rates and nominal spread widening during the period.
Unrealized gain on derivatives for the three-month period ended March 31, 2026 was approximately $6.1 million as compared to an unrealized loss on derivatives of $0.4 million for the
three-month period ended December 31, 2025. The increase of $6.5 million in unrealized gain on derivatives was primarily due to changes in interest rates and the composition of our derivatives relative to the prior period.
Unrealized gainloss on derivatives for the three-month period ended March
31,June 30, 2026 was approximately $6.1$9.3 million as compared to an unrealized
loss on derivativesgain of $22.7$6.1 million for the
three-month period ended March 31, 2025.2026. The increase$15.4 of
$28.8unfavorable million in unrealized gain on derivativeschange was primarily due to
changes in interest rates and the composition of our derivatives
relative to the prior period.
Unrealized loss on derivatives for the six-month period ended June 30, 2026 was approximately $3.2 million as compared to $41.9 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2025. The decrease of $38.7 million in unrealized loss on derivatives was primarily due to changes in interest rates and the composition of our derivatives relative to the prior period.
Unrealized loss on our investments in Servicing Related Assets for the three-month period ended March 31, 2026 was approximately $1.4 million as compared to $3.9 million for the three-month
period ended December 31, 2025. The decrease of $2.5 million in unrealized loss on our investments in Servicing Related Assets was primarily due to changes in valuation inputs or assumptions and paydown of underlying loans.
Unrealized loss on our investments in Servicing Related Assets for the three-month period ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was approximately $1.4$2.4 million as compared to $6.3$1.4 million for
the three-month
period ended March 31, 2025.2026. The decrease of $4.9$1.0 million in unrealized loss on our investments in Servicing Related Assets was primarily due to changes in valuation inputs or assumptions and paydown of underlying loans.
Unrealized loss on our investments in Servicing Related Assets for the six-month period ended June 30, 2026 was approximately $3.7 million as compared to $9.1 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2025. The decrease of $5.4 million in unrealized loss on our investments in Servicing Related Assets was primarily due to changes in valuation inputs or assumptions and paydown of underlying loans.
Credit Loss and Impairment on Other Assets
Credit loss and impairment on other assets was approximately $2.8 million for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2026. The increase of $2.8 million was due to the recognition of credit loss and impairment charges taken in the second quarter of 2026 on certain strategic investments and related receivables following management’s assessment of their estimated recoverable values.
General and administrative expense was $1.7 million for three-month period ended March 31, 2026 as compared to $1.5 million for the three-month period ended December 31, 2025. The increase of
$0.2 million in general and administrative expense was due to an increase in professional fees.
General and administrative expense was $1.7$2.1 million for the three-month period ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 as compared to $2.1$1.7 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2025.
2026. The decreaseincrease of $0.4
million in general and administrative expense was due to an decreaseincrease in professional fees. Merger related costs were $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026. These costs were incurred in connection with
the proposed merger with MITT and primarily consisted of legal fees.
General and administrative expense was $3.8 million for six-month period ended June 30, 2026 as compared to $4.0 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2025. The decrease of $0.2 million in general and administrative expense was due to a decrease in professional fees. Merger related costs were $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026. These costs were incurred in connection with the proposed merger with MITT and primarily consisted of legal fees.
Compensation and benefits expense for the three-month period ended March 31, 2026 was $1.6 million as compared to $1.7 million for the three-month period ended December 31, 2025. The change in
compensation and benefits was nominal.
Compensation and benefits expense for the three-month period ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $1.6$1.9 million as compared to $1.7$1.6 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2025.
2026. The changeincrease of $0.3 million in
compensation and benefits was nominal.due to the implementation of the 2026 Executive Plan.
Compensation and benefits expense for the six-month period ended June 30, 2026 was $3.5 million as compared to $3.1 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2025. The increase of $0.4 million in compensation and benefits was due to the implementation of the 2026 Executive Plan.
Net Income (Loss) Allocated to Noncontrolling Interests in Operating Partnership
Net income (loss) allocated to noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership, which are LTIP-OP Units owned by our directors, officers and employees of the Company and
by certain individuals who provided services to us through the Manager prior to the Internalization, represented approximately 1.4%, 1.7%1.5% and
1.9% 1.4% of net income for the three-month periods ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, December 31, 20252026 and March 31, 2026, respectively and
1.4% and 1.8% of net income (loss) for the six month periods ended June 30, 2026 and June 30, 2025 respectively.
Our GAAP equity changes as the values of our RMBS are marked to market each quarter, among other factors. The primary causes of mark to market changes are changes in
interest rates and nominal
spreads. During the three-month period ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, ana increasesmall unrealized gain on our available-for-sale RMBS was a result of changes in interest rates combined with the sale of securities. During the three-month
period ended March 31, 2026 and the six-month period ended June 30, 2026, a rise in interest rates combined with marginal widening of nominal spread wideningspreads caused a net unrealized loss on our available-for-sale RMBS. During the three-monthsix-month periodsperiod ended
June December 31, 2025 and March
31,30, 2025, a drop in interest rates and nominal spread tightening caused a net unrealized gain on our available-for-sale RMBS. Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale RMBS is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
Earnings available for distribution (“EAD”) is a non-GAAP financial measure that we define as GAAP net income (loss), excluding realized gain (loss) on RMBS, unrealized
gain (loss) on RMBS
measured at fair value through earnings, realized and unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives, realized gain (loss) on acquired assets, realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments in MSRs (net of any estimated MSR
amortization), credit loss and impairment on other assets, transaction related expense and any tax
expense (benefit) on realized and unrealized gain (loss) on MSRs.MSRs and other non-EAD income (loss) items. MSR amortization refers to the portion of
the change in fair value of the MSR that is primarily due to the realization of cashflows, runoff resulting from prepayments and an
adjustment for any gain or loss on the capital used to purchase the MSR. EAD also includes interest rate swap
periodic interest income (expense) and drop income on TBA dollar roll transactions, which are included in “Realized gain (loss) on
derivatives, net” on the consolidated statements of income (loss). EAD attributable to common stockholders is
adjusted to exclude outstanding LTIP-OP Units in our Operating Partnership and dividends paid on our preferred stock.
EAD for the three-month period ended March 31, 2026 as compared to the three-month period ended December 31, 2025 increased by approximately $1.4 million, or $0.03 per average common share due
to decrease in borrowing costs.
EAD for the three-month period ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 as compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 20252026 decreasedincreased by approximately $0.1$0.3 million, or $0.03$0.01 per average
common share
primarily due to aan decreaseincrease in swap periodic interestdrop income on TBA dollar rolls offset by an increase in netgeneral interestand income.administrative expenses.
EAD for the six-month period ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2025 increased by approximately $2.2 million, or $0.02 per average common share primarily due to a decrease in borrowing costs offset by a decrease in interest rate swap periodic interest income.
Aurora’s MSR portfolio of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac MSRs have an aggregate UPB of approximately $15.6$15.2 billion as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had repurchase agreements with multiple counterparties and approximately $1,121.7$1,008.7 million of outstanding repurchase agreement borrowings from 17 18
of those
counterparties, which were used to finance RMBS. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our exposure (defined as the amount of cash and securities pledged as collateral, less the borrowing under the repurchase agreement) to any of the counterparties
under the
repurchase agreements did not exceed five percent of the Company’s equity. Under these agreements, which are uncommitted facilities, we sell a security to a counterparty and concurrently agree to repurchase the same security at a
later date at
the same price that we initially sold the security plus the interest charged. The sale price represents financing proceeds and the difference between the sale and repurchase prices represents interest on the financing. The
price at which the
security is sold generally represents the market value of the security less a discount or “haircut.” The weighted average haircut on our repurchase debt at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was approximately 4.4%.4.5%. During the term of the
repurchase transaction,
which can be as short as a few days, the counterparty holds the security and posts margin as collateral. The counterparty monitors and calculates what it estimates to be the value of the collateral during the term of
the transaction. If this
value declines by more than a de minimis threshold, the counterparty requires us to post additional collateral (or “margin”) in order to maintain the initial haircut on the collateral. This margin is typically
required to be posted in the form
of cash and cash equivalents. Furthermore, we are, from time to time, a party to derivative agreements or financing arrangements that may be subject to margin calls based on the value of such instruments.
The decrease in the Company’s borrowings under its repurchase agreements as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 as compared to December 31, 2025 was primarily due to the decrease in principalsale of the RMBS, a
large portion of which are financed through repurchase agreements.
These short-term borrowings were used to finance certain of our investments in RMBS. The RMBS repurchase agreements are guaranteed by the Company. The weighted average
difference between the
market value of the assets and the face amount of available financing for the RMBS repurchase agreements, or the haircut, was 4.5% as of June 30, 2026 and 4.4% as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025. The following tables provide
additional information regarding
borrowings under our repurchase agreements (dollars in thousands):
The amount of collateral as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, including cash, was $1,171.7$1,056.3 million and $1,192.6 million, respectively.
CHMI insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-15 | Murin Joseph J |
Grant/award | 42,017 | — | — |
| 2026-06-15 | Mercer Robert C Jr |
Grant/award | 42,017 | — | — |
| 2026-06-15 | Cook Sharon L |
Grant/award | 42,017 | — | — |
| 2026-06-15 | Hoffman Dale S |
Grant/award | 42,017 | — | — |
| 2026-06-01 | Patel Apeksha |
Option exercise | 11,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-01 | Patel Apeksha |
Shares withheld for tax | 3,449 | $2.42 | $8.3K |
Well-known investors holding CHMI (13F)
None of the 59 investors we track reported a position in their latest 13F.