CHPT 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. · NYSE · Miscellaneous Electrical Machinery, Equipment & Supplies · CIK 1777393 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “ChargePoint’s business, operating efficiency and competitive position may be adversely affected if it does not successfully identify, develop, integrate and deploy artificial intelligence and other advanced automation technologies in a timely, effective and compliant manner.”
New heading “ChargePoint is highly reliant on its networked charging solution and information technology systems and data, and those of its service providers and component suppliers; any of these systems and data may be subject to cyber-attacks, service disruptions or other security incidents, which could result in data breaches, loss or interruption of services, intellectual property theft, claims, litigation, regulatory investigations, significant liability, reputational damage and other adverse consequences.”
New heading “Computer malware, viruses, ransomware, hacking, phishing attacks and similar disruptions could result in security and privacy breaches and interruption in service, which could harm ChargePoint’s business”
New heading “If ChargePoint fails to maintain an effective system of internal controls, its ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be impaired.”
New heading “ChargePoint faces exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations which could have a material and adverse effect on its results of operations.”
New heading “Impairment of goodwill may require ChargePoint to record a significant charge to earnings.”
New heading “ChargePoint is subject to evolving technical, safety, metrology (weights and measures), labeling and payment requirements for EV charging equipment and services; failure to comply with, or changes in, these requirements could increase costs, delay deployments, limit revenue recognition, reduce utilization of existing assets, or lead to enforcement actions.”
New heading “Servicing the 2025 Senior Loan and 2028 Convertible Note obligations will require a significant amount of cash.”
New heading “ChargePoint recently completed a reverse stock split of its shares of Common Stock, which could adversely affect the market price and liquidity of ChargePoint’s Common Stock due to the reduced number of shares outstanding and could potentially have an antitakeover effect.”
Removed heading “Some members of ChargePoint’s management have limited experience in operating a public company.”
Removed heading “ChargePoint faces risks related to global epidemics and health pandemics which could have a material and adverse effect on its business and results of operations.”
Removed heading “ChargePoint is highly reliant on its networked charging solution and information technology systems and data, and those of its service providers and component suppliers, any of which systems and data may be subject to cyber-attacks, service disruptions or other security incidents, which could result in data breaches, loss or interruption of services, intellectual property theft, claims, litigation, regulatory investigations, significant liability, reputational damage and other adverse consequences.”
Removed heading “Computer malware, viruses, ransomware, hacking, phishing attacks and similar disruptions could result in security and privacy breaches and interruption in service, which could harm ChargePoint’s business.”
Removed heading “ChargePoint previously identified material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting. If ChargePoint identifies additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fails to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, this may result in material misstatements contained within ChargePoint’s consolidated financial statements or cause ChargePoint to fail to meet its periodic reporting obligations.”
Removed heading “If ChargePoint fails to regain compliance with the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange, it could result in the delisting of ChargePoint’s Common Stock and adversely affect the market price and liquidity of ChargePoint’s Common Stock.”
Removed heading “Servicing the 2028 Convertible Note obligations will require a significant amount of cash. ChargePoint may not have sufficient cash flow from its business to pay its outstanding debt, and ChargePoint may not have the ability to raise the funds necessary to settle conversions of the 2028 Convertible Notes in cash or to repurchase the 2028 Convertible Notes upon a fundamental change, which could adversely affect its business and results of operations.”
Largest changes
“ChargePoint may be unable to meet the ongoing reporting demands as a public company, including the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”), and may be unable to accurately report its financial results, or report them within the timeframes required by law or stock exchange regulations. Failure to comply with Sarbanes-Oxley, when and as applicable, could also potentially subject ChargePoint to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities. …”see in full comparison
“From time to time, ChargePoint has experienced cyberattacks on its information technology infrastructure and systems. Computer malware, viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions could lead to interruption and delays in ChargePoint’s services and operations and loss, misuse or theft of data. Computer malware, viruses, ransomware, hacking and phishing attacks against online networks have become more prevalent and may occur on ChargePoint’s systems in the future. …”see in full comparison
“From time to time, ChargePoint has experienced cyberattacks on its information technology infrastructure and systems. Computer malware, viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions could lead to interruption and delays in ChargePoint’s services and operations and loss, misuse or theft of data. …”see in full comparison
“To the extent any security incident results in unauthorized access to, or damage to, acquisition, use, corruption, loss, destruction, alteration or dissemination of, ChargePoint data (including intellectual property and personal information) or ChargePoint products—or for it to be believed or reported that any of these occurred—it could disrupt ChargePoint’s business, harm ChargePoint’s reputation, compel ChargePoint to comply with applicable data breach notification and consumer protection laws, including those increasingly applicable to the use of artificial intelligence and automated …”see in full comparison
“In April 2022, ChargePoint originally issued the 2028 Convertible Notes and in July 2023, ChargePoint entered into the 2027 Revolving Credit Facility. The indenture for the 2028 Convertible Notes includes a restrictive covenant that, subject to specified exceptions, limits the ability of ChargePoint and its subsidiaries to incur secured debt in excess of $750.0 million. …”see in full comparison
“The 2025 Credit Agreement contains (i) customary affirmative and negative covenants that, among other things, restrict the ability of ChargePoint and its subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, incur liens, make investments or acquisitions, declare or pay dividends or other restricted payments, dispose of assets, or enter into transactions with affiliates and (ii) customary events of default, including a cross-default to material indebtedness and bankruptcy-related triggers. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (159)
•If ChargePoint fails to regain compliance with the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange, it could result in the delisting of ChargePoint’s Common Stock and adversely affect the market price and liquidity of ChargePoint’s Common Stock.
•Some members of ChargePoint’s management have limited experience in operating a public company.
•ChargePoint is highly reliant on its networked charging solution and information technology systems and data, and those of its service providers and component suppliers; any of these systems and data may be subject to cyber-attacks, service disruptions or other security incidents, which could result in data breaches, loss or interruption of services, intellectual property theft, claims, litigation, regulatory investigations, significant liability, reputational damage and other adverse consequences.
•Future sales of ChargePoint’s common stock (“Common Stock”) in the public market, or the perception that such sales may occur, could reduce ChargePoint’s stock price, and any conversions of its unsecured Convertible Senior PIK Toggle Notes (the “2028 Convertible Notes”) will, and any additional capital raised through the sale of equity or any future convertible securities ChargePoint may issue could, dilute existing stockholders’ ownership.
•ChargePoint has entered into athe 2027 Revolving2025 Credit FacilityAgreement, thatwhich imposes certain restrictions on its business and operations that may affect its ability to operate its business and make payments on its indebtedness.
•ChargePoint may need to raise additional funds to support its operations and these funds may not be available when needed or may not be available on terms that are favorable to ChargePoint.
•ChargePoint is highly reliant on its networked charging solution and information technology systems and data, and those of its service providers and component suppliers, any of which systems and data may be subject to cyber-attacks, service disruptions or other security incidents, which could result in data breaches, loss or interruption of services, intellectual property theft, claims, litigation, regulatory investigations, significant liability, reputational damage and other adverse consequences.
•ChargePoint’s business is subject to risks associated with natural disasters and the adverse effects associated with climate change, including earthquakes, wildfires or other types of natural disasters or resource shortages, including public safety power shut-offs that have occurred and may continue to occur in California, the effects of which could disrupt and harm its operations and those of ChargePoint’s customers.
•ChargePoint previously identified material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting. If ChargePoint identifies additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fails to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, this may result in material misstatements contained within ChargePoint’s consolidated financial statements or cause ChargePoint to fail to meet its periodic reporting obligations.
ChargePoint believes it will continue to incur significant operating expenses and net losses in future quarters for the near term. There can be no assurance that it will be able to achieve or maintain profitability in the future. ChargePoint’s potential profitability is particularly dependent upon the continued adoption of EVs by consumers and fleet operators and the widespread adoption of electric fleets and other electric transportation modalities, each of which are still in the very early stages of widespread adoption and may not occur with the volume and timing that ChargePoint expects. For instance, the North American EV market has recently suffered a substantial decline in the sale of new EVs since the termination of the $7,500 U.S. federal tax credit in September 2025, resulting in quarterly declines of new EVs sold as compared to the same quarters in the prior year. Any prolonged decrease in demand for new EVs or networked charging systems (“Networked Charging Systems”), or any delays in discretionary purchases of EV infrastructure, such as charging stations, by commercial, fleet or residential consumers may result in slowing growth or decreased revenue for ChargePoint which may adversely affect its gross margins and could materially adversely affect ChargePoint’s business and results of operations.
ChargePoint operates in the evolving EV mobility industry that is characterized by rapid and unpredictable shifts in technological innovation and leaders, intense competition, changing EV adoption rates and customer preferences, evolving and shifting production and manufacturing plans from EV manufacturers,manufacturers and frequent introductions of new products, technologies, and services. ChargePoint may not be able to adapt to the dynamic nature of the evolving EV mobility industry, sustain the pace of improvements to its products successfully, manage its growth successfully or implement systems, processes, and controls in an efficient or timely manner or in a manner that does not negatively affect the results of its operations. ChargePoint has a relatively short history operating its business at its current scale. The growth and expansion of its business has placed and continues to place a significant strain on management, operations, financial infrastructure and corporate culture.
ChargePoint has encountered, and will continue to encounter, risks and uncertainties frequently experienced by growing companies in evolving industries. In addition, ChargePoint’s future growth rate is subject to a number of uncertainties, such as general economic and market conditions. In particular, ChargePoint has limited experience operating its business at its current scale under economic conditions characterized by high inflationinflation, imposition of domestic and foreign tariffs, or in recessionary or uncertain economic environments. General economic and market conditions, consumer preferences, market demand, governmental and legislative initiatives or lack thereof, may diminish the rate of EV adoption or result in delays by EV manufacturers to transition their manufacturing to mostly or exclusively electric vehicles or cause EV manufacturers to eliminate their plans to transition to predominately EV manufacturing, and if such factors exist or persist, the demand for ChargePoint’s products and services could be adversely affected. If ChargePoint’s assumptions regarding these risks and uncertainties are incorrect or change in reaction to changes in the market or the economy, or if ChargePoint does not address these risks successfully, ChargePoint’s results of operations could differ materially from its expectations, and ChargePoint’s business, results of operations, and financial condition would be adversely affected.
In addition, thereThere are other means for charging EVs, which could affect the level of demand for onsite charging capabilities at businesses. For example, Tesla Inc. has opened its supercharger network up to non-Tesla EVs, which could reduce overall demand for EV charging at other sites, including those using ChargePoint’s networked charging stations. In addition, many of the major EV manufacturers have recently announced the adoption of the SAE J3400, formerly known as North American Charging Standard or NACS as the standard charging port for their future EV models. Widespread adoption of NACS by EV manufacturers may mean use of EV charging networks, including ChargePoint’s, that historically make use of other charging port standards, less desirable in the future unless owners or operators of such charging stations retrofit or upgrade their charging stations to be NACS enabled. In addition to competition from established EV charging station network providers, third-party contractors can provide basic electric charging capabilities to potential customers seeking to have on premiseson-premises EV charging capability or individual customers seeking home charging. Finally, many EV charging manufacturers, including ChargePoint, are offering home charging equipment, which could reduce demand for on premisecommercial charging capabilities of potential customers and reduce the demand for onsitecommercial charging capabilities if EV owners find charging at home to be sufficient.
Further, ChargePoint’s current or potential competitors may be acquired by third-parties with greater available resources, may have ready access to the capital markets for additional funding, or may operate in lower cost manufacturing or development geographies, such as Asia or Latin America. As a result, competitors may be able to respond more quickly and effectively than ChargePoint to new or changing opportunities, technologies, standards or customer requirements and may have the ability to initiate or withstand substantial price competition. ChargePoint’s competitors, either as the result of such competitor’s market position, available human and capital resources advantages or industrial scale may be able to influence EV adoption or the overall market for EV charging, in both North America and Europe. In addition, competitors may in the future establish cooperative relationships with vendors of complementary products, technologies or services to increase the availability of their solutions in the marketplace. This competition may also materialize in the form of costly intellectual property disputes or litigation involving ChargePoint. If ChargePoint fails to compete with third-parties with greater available resources, is unable to successfully influence state, local and federal governmental policies with respect to the EV charging market like its competitors,competitors or successfully partner with cooperative industry efforts in the EV charging market, its growth and revenue will be limited which would adversely affect its business and results of operations.
New competitors or alliances may emerge in the future that have greater market share, more widely adopted proprietary technologies, greater marketing expertise and greater financial resources, which could put ChargePoint at a competitive disadvantage. Future competitors could also be better positioned to serve certain sectors of ChargePoint’s current or future target markets, which could create price pressure, in North America and Europe. In light of these factors, even if ChargePoint believes its offerings are more effective and higher quality than those of its competitors, current or potential customers may purchase its competitor’s solutions if they are less expensive or more widely available. If ChargePoint fails to adapt to changing market conditions or continue to compete successfully with currentexisting EV charging station providers or new competitors, its growth and revenue will be limited which would adversely affect its business and results of operations.
ChargePoint’s business, operating efficiency and competitive position may be adversely affected if it does not successfully identify, develop, integrate and deploy artificial intelligence and other advanced automation technologies in a timely, effective and compliant manner.
The EV charging industry, energy infrastructure markets and enterprise software ecosystems in which ChargePoint operates are experiencing rapid technological change, including increased adoption of artificial intelligence (“AI”), machine learning, advanced analytics and automation across product development, network operations, customer support, billing, fraud detection, cybersecurity, manufacturing, logistics and other business processes. To remain competitive and operate efficiently at scale, ChargePoint may need to incorporate such technologies into its products, services and internal systems. Failure to do so could place ChargePoint at a competitive disadvantage, reduce operating efficiency, increase costs, limit the functionality or performance of its solutions, or impair its ability to meet customer, regulatory or partner expectations.
ChargePoint has implemented, and intends to implement in the future, initiatives to deploy AI technologies, agentic AI solutions and AI-enabled capabilities in its ChargePoint Platform, eMSP driver application, customer support solutions and in internal enterprise systems. However, successfully adopting and implementing AI technologies involves significant operational, technical, financial and organizational challenges, including assessing appropriate use cases; ensuring data quality, availability and governance; integrating AI‑enabled capabilities into legacy systems and complex workflows; managing dependencies on third‑party technology providers; recruiting and retaining specialized personnel; and establishing appropriate oversight, controls and risk management processes. ChargePoint may incur substantial costs and devote significant management attention to these efforts, and AI‑related initiatives may not be completed on schedule, operate as intended or deliver anticipated benefits. In addition, evolving cybersecurity, data privacy, regulatory and stakeholder requirements may constrain or delay deployment or require costly modifications. If ChargePoint is unable to successfully implement AI‑enabled capabilities while competitors or partners do so more effectively, it may experience reduced demand for its solutions, pricing pressure, loss of market share, higher operating costs, reduced margins or slower growth, any of which could adversely affect its business, results of operations and financial condition.
ChargePoint derives a substantial portion of its overall revenue from the sale of networkedits chargingNetworked systems.Charging Systems. ChargePoint believes the penetration of EVs in the United States and Europe is heavily reliant on EV availability, consumer adoption of EVs, the availability and reliability of EV infrastructure and government mandates and incentive programs tied to EV adoption. Any sustained downturn in demand for EVs or EV infrastructure, such as decreased demand in EV charging stations, would harm ChargePoint’s business. For example, increased interest rates, an overall slowdown in economic activity, a recession or the possibility of a recession in the United States or EuropeEurope, elimination of government mandates and incentive programs, and increased tariffs, especially those targeted at the automotive industry may decrease the overall demand for EVs or EV infrastructure such as ChargePoint’s networkedNetworked chargingCharging systems.Systems. For instance, the North American EV market has recently suffered a substantial decline in the sale of new EVs since the termination of the $7,500 U.S. federal tax credit in September 2025, resulting in quarterly declines of new EVs sold as compared to the same quarters in the prior year. Any prolonged decrease in demand for networkednew chargingEVs systems,or Networked Charging Systems, or any delays in discretionary purchases of EV infrastructure, such as charging stations, by commercial, fleet or residential consumers may result in slowing growth or decreased revenue for ChargePoint which may adversely affect its gross margins and could materially adversely affect ChargePoint’s business and results of operations.
ChargePoint seeks to maintain sufficient levels of inventory in order to avoid supply interruptions and keep sufficient amounts of finished products on hand while also avoiding accumulating excess inventory which increases working capital needs and lowers gross margin. In recent quarters, ChargePoint has maintained elevated levels of inventory, and ChargePoint is also preparing for the introduction of its next generation AC and DC Networked Charging System models, which increases the complexity of inventory management and heightens the risk that certain existing products or components may become excess, obsolete, or subject to inventory write‑downs. To ensure adequate inventory supply and manage ChargePoint's operations with its third-party manufacturers and suppliers, ChargePoint forecasts material requirements and demand for its products in order to predict future inventory needs and then places orders with its suppliers based on these predictions. ChargePoint's ability to accurately forecast demand for its products could be negatively affected by many factors, including rapid or slowing growth, failure to accurately manage ChargePoint's expansion strategy, new product introductions by ChargePoint or its competitors, an increase or decrease in customer demand for ChargePoint products, ChargePoint's failure to accurately forecast customer acceptance of new products, unanticipated changes in general market conditions or regulatory matters, and the weakening of economic conditions or consumer confidence in future economic conditions. The introduction of new AC and DC products may further increase these risks, as demand for legacy products may decline more rapidly than anticipated, channel partners or customers may delay purchases in anticipation of newer offerings, or certain components or finished goods may not be usable across product generations. In addition, the majority of ChargePoint’s products are sold through its channel partners, distributors and resellers and, as a result, ChargePoint is highly reliant on the sales forecasting, sell-through activities and inventory management of its channel partners. If ChargePoint’s channel partners are not effective or efficient in forecasting sales, or sales of particular products, or managing their inventory levels or sell-through expectations then ChargePoint’s management of inventory levels, sales forecasts and parts ordering may be adversely affected which may harm ChargePoint’s financial conditions and results of operations.
Inventory levels in excess of customer demand may result in a portion of ChargePoint's inventory becoming obsolete, as well as inventory write-downs or write-offs. Conversely, if ChargePoint underestimates customer demand for its products or its own requirements for components, sub-assemblies, and materials, ChargePoint's third-party manufacturers and suppliers may not be able to deliver components, sub-assemblies, and materials to meet ChargePoint's standards, lead times or requirements, which could result in inadequate inventory levels or interruptions, delays, or cancellations of deliveries to ChargePoint's customers, any of which would damage its reputation, customer relationships, and business. In addition, components, sub-assemblies, and materials incorporated into ChargePoint products may require lengthy order lead times. As a result, additional supplies or materials may not be available on terms that are acceptable to ChargePoint or at all, and ChargePoint's third-party manufacturers and suppliers may not be able to allocate sufficient capacity in order to meet ChargePoint's increased requirements, any of which could have an adverse effect on ChargePoint’s ability to meet customer demand for its products and results of operations. ChargePoint has in the past experienced fluctuating demand for certain product lines which led to excess inventory that caused ChargePoint to write down, sell at prices lower than expected or discard such inventory.inventory and similar outcomes could occur in the future. If ChargePoint is not successful in managing its inventory, ChargePoint's business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
ChargePoint’s success is dependent in part upon establishing and maintaining relationships with a variety of channel partners that it utilizes to extend its geographic reach and market penetration, particularly in the United States. ChargePoint uses a two-tiered, indirect fulfillment model whereby ChargePoint sells its products and services to its distributors, which in turn sell to resellers, which then sell to end users. ChargePoint refers to these end users as customers. ChargePoint anticipates that it will continue to rely on this two-tiered sales model in order to help facilitate sales of ChargePoint’s products and to grow its business internationally. In the fiscal years ended January 31, 2026, 2025, 2024, and 2023,2024, ChargePoint derived a majority of its billings from products and subscriptions sold through channel partners. ChargePoint’s agreements with its channel partners are non-exclusive and do not prohibit them from working with ChargePoint’s competitors or offering competing solutions, and some of ChargePoint’s channel partners may have more established relationships with ChargePoint’s competitors. Similarly, ChargePoint’s channel partners have no obligations to renew their agreements with ChargePoint on commercially reasonable terms or at all, and certain of the agreements governing these relationships may be terminated by either party at any time, with no or limited notice. If ChargePoint’s channel partners choose to place greater emphasis on products of their own or those offered by ChargePoint’s competitors or as a result of an acquisition, competitive factors or for other reasons do not continue to market and sell ChargePoint’s solutions in an effective manner or at all, ChargePoint’s ability to grow its business and sell its products may be adversely affected. In addition, ChargePoint’s failure to recruit additional channel partners, or any reduction or delay in their sales of ChargePoint solutions and subscriptions, including because of economic uncertainty, or due to conflicts between channel sales and ChargePoint’s direct sales force may harm ChargePoint’s results of operations. Finally, even if ChargePoint is successful in establishing and maintaining relationships with channel partners, these relationships may not result in greater customer usage of ChargePoint’s solutions and professional services or increased revenue.
ChargePoint’s agreements with its channel partners are non-exclusive and do not prohibit them from working with ChargePoint’s competitors or offering competing solutions, and some of ChargePoint’s channel partners may have more established relationships with ChargePoint’s competitors. Similarly, ChargePoint’s channel partners have no obligations to renew their agreements with ChargePoint on commercially reasonable terms or at all, and certain of the agreements governing these relationships may be terminated by either party at any time, with no or limited notice. Further, in May 2025, ChargePoint announced a strategic partner relationship with Eaton Corporation (“Eaton”), an industry leading power management company, to facilitate sales and distribution of ChargePoint’s products and services through Eaton’s channel network, as well as collaborate on new product development to optimize value to end users. The utilization of the Eaton’s channel network may result in higher concentration of a material amount of channel sales through Eaton’s network, with ChargePoint continuing to maintain relationships with channel distributors, including in training and sales support. If ChargePoint fails to execute or perform its obligations under the strategic relationship or Eaton fails to meet its sales targets, execute marketing strategies, or successfully execute sales processes, ChargePoint’s reputation, customer relationships, revenue and financial performance could be adversely affected.
If ChargePoint’s channel partners choose to place greater emphasis on products of their own or those offered by ChargePoint’s competitors or as a result of an acquisition, competitive factors, ChargePoint’s strategic channel partnership, or for other reasons do not continue to market and sell ChargePoint’s solutions in an effective manner or at all, ChargePoint’s ability to grow its business and sell its products may be adversely affected. In addition, ChargePoint’s failure to recruit additional channel partners, or any reduction or delay in their sales of ChargePoint solutions and subscriptions, including because of economic uncertainty, or due to conflicts between channel sales and ChargePoint’s direct sales force may harm ChargePoint’s results of operations. Finally, even if ChargePoint is successful in establishing and maintaining relationships with channel partners, these relationships may not result in greater customer usage of ChargePoint’s solutions and professional services or increased revenue.
ChargePoint’s ability to grow its customer base, achieve broader market acceptance, grow revenue, and achieve and sustain profitability will depend, to a significant extent, on its ability to effectively expand its sales and marketing operations and activities. Sales and marketing expenses represent a significant percentage of ChargePoint’s total revenue, and its operating results will suffer if sales and marketing expenditures do not contribute significantly to increasing revenue. ChargePoint is substantially dependent on its channel partners and direct sales force to obtain new customers. ChargePoint must expend considerable time, effort and cost to train and support its channel partners’ sales forces and there is no guarantee that such efforts will be successful or result in an increase of sales of ChargePoint products or an increase in its revenues. If ChargePoint is unable to successfully train and develop the sales forces of its channel partners, including its strategic channel partnership, or if ChargePoint fails to adequately execute on such arrangements, ChargePoint’s revenues may suffer which would adversely affect its business and results of operations.
ChargePoint is substantially dependent on its channel partners and direct sales force to obtain new customers.Additionally, ChargePoint may not be able to recruit, hire and retain a sufficient number of sales personnel, which may adversely affect its ability to expand its sales capabilities. New hires require significant training and time before they achieve full productivity, particularly in new sales territories. Recent hires and planned hires may not become as productive as quickly as anticipated and ChargePoint may be unable to hire or retain sufficient numbers of qualified individuals. Furthermore, hiring sales personnel in new countries can be costly, complex and time-consuming, and requires additional set up and upfront costs that may be disproportionate to the initial revenue expected from those countries. There is significant competition for direct sales personnel with strong sales skills and technical knowledge. ChargePoint’s ability to achieve significant revenue growth in the future will depend, in large part, on its success in recruiting, training, incentivizing and retaining a sufficient number of qualified direct sales personnel and on such personnel attaining desired productivity levels within a reasonable amount of time. ChargePoint’s business will be harmed if continuing investment in its sales and marketing capabilities does not generate a significant increase in revenue.
ChargePoint’s business depends on the economic health of its current and prospective customers and overall demand for EV charging infrastructure. In addition, the purchase of ChargePoint products and services is often discretionary and typically involves a significant commitment of capital and other resources. The United States, the European Union (“EU”), and the United Kingdom have experienced recently experienced historically highhigher levels of inflation. In responseresponse, and due to recent high levels of inflation and recession fears, the U.S. Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, and the Bank of England have in the recent past raised and have indicated they may maintain higher interest rates and implement fiscal policy interventions. While these interventions have resulted in lowering inflation in recent quarters, there is no guarantee that these measures will maintain lower inflation and it may be necessary for central banks to increase interests rates again in the future in the event high levels of inflation resume. These actions may also reduce economic growth rates, create a recession, and have other similar effects.
In addition, in February 2025,2026, the United States announcedSupreme Court issued a ruling striking down certain tariffs previously imposed under the impositionInternational Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”). Following the Supreme Court’s decision, the U.S. federal government announced its intention to implement new tariffs and surcharges of tariffsup to 15% on certain goods importedimports from Canada,many Mexicoof andthe Chinasame andcountries haspreviously madesubject announcementsto IEEPA under separate authority, including Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. There remains substantial uncertainty regarding the potential impositionduration of existing and newly announced tariffs onand goodssurcharges, importedpotential fromchanges or pauses to such tariffs, tariff levels, and whether further additional tariffs or other jurisdictions.retaliatory Impactedactions countriesmay havebe imposed, modified, or suspended, and in the futureimpacts may impose retaliatory tariffs, andof such actions could give rise to an escalation of other trade measures by the countries subject to such tariffs. While the application of certain previously announced tariffs have been delayed, there is no guarantee that the tariffs will not go into effect and there is the possibility that additional United States tariffs may be imposed on Canada,ChargePoint’s Mexico, China and other countries.business. Trade restrictions and increased tariffs between the United States and countries like Canada, MexicoMexico, China and Chinamembers of the EU may result in adverse economic conditions, increase the costs of goods sold and result in a recession or the threat of a recession. For example, the United States automotive manufacture industry is particularly sensitive to the impact of tariffs on the increased costs of manufacturing and selling vehicles, which may result in substantial increases to the cost of vehicles to consumers, including EVs. Because ChargePoint is substantially reliant on the increased adoption and sales of new EVs, if there is any downturn in the sales of EVs or consumers reduce their purchases of new EVs, either because the vehicles are more expensive or as the result of a general downturn in the overall economy as the result of the tariffs,economy, ChargePoint’s customers may reduce their need for EV infrastructure development and ChargePoint’s business, financial results and results of operations may be harmed.
A downturn in macroeconomic conditions, including a resumption in the rise of inflation and interest rates; increases or changes in U.S. or global tariff policies and programs and any corresponding supply chain disruptions; global political and economic uncertainty; geopolitical tensions, such as the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, ongoing conflicts in the Middle East andinvolving the possibilityUnited ofStates, tradeIran, war,Israel and other Gulf States and conflict or sanctions between the United States and China; a lack of availability of credit; financial services sector instability; a reduction in business confidence and activity; and other factors have in the past, and may in the future, negatively affect the industries to which ChargePoint sells its products and services. ChargePoint’s customers may suffer from reduced operating budgets, which could cause them to defer, reduce, or forego purchases of ChargePoint’s products or services. Moreover, competitors may respond to market conditions by lowering prices, which may make the prices for ChargePoint’s products and services less competitive or cause ChargePoint to reduce its prices, which in turn may reduce ChargePoint’s gross margins and adversely affect ChargePoint’s growth. Uncertainty about global and regional economic conditions, a downturn in the sale or delivery of EVs, or a reduction in EV infrastructure spending even if economic conditions are stable, could adversely impact ChargePoint’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Disruptions in the manufacturing, delivery and overall supply chain of vehicleEV manufacturers and suppliers have in the past and may in the future result in additional costs and, to a lesser extent, component shortages, and have led to fluctuations in EV sales in markets around the world. Increased demand for personal electronics and trade restrictions that affect raw materials have contributed in the past and may in the future result in a shortfall of components and supplies, such as semiconductor chips, which has caused additional supply challenges both within and outside of ChargePoint’s industry. Supply chain challenges, component shortages and heightened logistics costs have previously adversely affected ChargePoint’s gross margins and may do so again in the future. ChargePoint may need to incur additional costs to expedite delivery of components and replacement parts used in charging stations or in providing installation or maintenance services or to proactively increase inventory. In the event ChargePoint is required to take such actions, ChargePoint may need to raise its prices, impose surcharges or other fees or refuse to negotiate discounts.
•the failure or inability to accurately forecast demand and obtain sufficient quantities of quality rawcomponents, materials or replacement parts on a cost-effective basis;
•volatility in the availability and cost of materials or services, including rising prices due to inflation, imposition of tariffs, or sanctions or any trade wars with countries that are critical to ChargePoint’s supply chain or contract manufacturing partners such as Mexico, China and Taiwan;
•geopolitical turmoil, including the ongoing invasionUkraine-Russia of Ukraine by Russiaconflict and ongoing conflicts in the Middle East,East involving the United States, Iran, Israel and other Gulf States, rising political tensions with China or increased trade restrictions between the United States, Canada, Mexico, Russia, China and other countries, social unrest, political instability, terrorism, or other acts of war which may further adversely impact supply chains, shipping, transportation and logistics disruptions.
In addition to the tariffs imposed on China,tariffs, the United States has imposed extensive export controlscontrols, targeted primarily at the semiconductor industryindustry, in China. If China retaliateshas in the past and may in the future retaliate to such measuresmeasures. If China imposes retaliatory tariffs, or if there is a conflict between China and Taiwan, which is a leading producer of semiconductors, there could be further disruption to the semiconductor industry and global supply chains. ChargePoint or the suppliers it procures components from may be unable to manufacture products at prices ChargePoint’s customers would accept, or at all. Any inability to pass on future increased costs to customers would put downward pressure on ChargePoint’s gross margins and adversely affect ChargePoint’s business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, while ChargePoint has not yet experienced a direct impact to its supply chain due to thegeopolitical conflict between Russia and Ukraine, conflicts in the Middle East or rising political tensions with China,conflicts, ChargePoint may experience an impact in the future due to increased fuel and shipping costs, limited supply ofof, or tariffs imposed onon, components or replacement parts used by ChargePoint in its manufacturing process,process or the automotive industry in general, and delays caused by changes to global shipping routes and logistics. Such adverse impacts on ChargePoint’s supply chain could limit its ability to manufacture and sell its products on a timely and cost-effective basis and adversely affect its gross margins, which could materially adversely affect ChargePoint’s business and results of operations.
In addition, ChargePoint is subject to requirements under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) to diligence, disclose and report whether or not its products contain minerals originating from the Democratic Republic of the Congo and adjoining countries, or conflict minerals. ChargePoint will incur additional costs to comply with these disclosure requirements, including costs related to determining the source of any of the relevant minerals and metals used in ChargePoint’s products. These requirements could adversely affect the sourcing, availability and pricing of minerals used in the components used in ChargePoint’s products. It is also possible that ChargePoint’s reputation may be adversely affected if it determines that certain of its products contain minerals not determined to be conflict-free or if it is unable to alter its products, processes or sources of supply to avoid use of such materials. ChargePoint may also encounter end-customers who require that all of the components of the products be certified as conflict free.conflict-free. If ChargePoint is not able to meet this requirement, such end-customers may choose to purchase products from a different company.
OnIn Septemberrecent 6, 2023, January 10, 2024 and September 4, 2024,years, ChargePoint has announced a planseries to reduce its global workforce by approximately 10%, 12% and 15%, respectively. Theseof reorganization plans that were independently adoptedadopted, including the March 2026 Reorganization described in Part II, Item 9B, “Other Information” and in Note 15, Subsequent Events in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, under “March 2026 Reorganization” (collectively, the “Reorganizations”). The Reorganizations were intended to improve operational efficiencies and operating costs and better align ChargePoint’s workforce with current business needs, top strategic priorities, and key growth opportunities. ChargePoint may incur additional expenses not currently contemplated due to events associated with the Reorganizations, for example, the Reorganizations may have a future impact on other areas of ChargePoint’s liabilities and obligations, which could result in losses in future periods. ChargePoint may not realize, in full or in part, the anticipated benefits and savings from the Reorganizations due to unforeseen difficulties, delays or unexpected costs. If ChargePoint is unable to realize the expected operational efficiencies and cost savings from the Reorganizations, its operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected. In addition, ChargePoint may need to undertake additional workforce reductions or restructuring activities in the future.
ChargePoint’s primary operations are in the United StatesStates, Europe and EuropeIndia and it maintains contractual relationships with parts and manufacturing suppliers in the Asia-Pacific region, Europe, Mexico and other locations. Also, ChargePoint maintains research and development teams in Gurgaon and Bangalore, India, Reading, England and Radstadt, Austria. Managing theseChargePoint’s international operations requires additional resources and controls, and could subject ChargePoint to risks associated with international operations, including:
•compliance with multiple, potentially conflicting and changing governmental laws, regulations, certifications, and permitting processes including environmental, banking, employment, tax, information security, privacy, and data protection laws and regulations such as the EU General Data Protection Regulation (“EU GDPR”), national legislation implementing the same, the United Kingdom Data Protection Act 2018 (“UK GDPR”), and certain other changing requirements for legally transferring data out of the European Economic Area;
Some members of ChargePoint’s management have limited experience in operating a public company.
Some of ChargePoint’s executive officers have limited experience in the management of a publicly-traded company. For example, Mr. Rick Wilmer was appointed as ChargePoint’s Chief Executive Officer in November 2023, marking the first time Mr. Wilmer has served as the Chief Executive Officer for a publicly-traded company and in July 2024, Ms. Mansi Khetani was appointed as ChargePoint’s Chief Financial Officer, marking the first time Ms. Khetani has served as a Chief Financial Officer for a publicly-traded company. The management team may not successfully or effectively conduct the management of a public company that is subject to significant regulatory oversight and reporting obligations under federal securities laws, particularly in light of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) increasing focus on former shell companies.
Their limited experience in dealing with the increasingly complex laws pertaining to public companies could be a significant disadvantage in that it is likely that an increasing amount of their time may be devoted to these activities, which will result in less time being devoted to the management and growth of ChargePoint. ChargePoint may not have adequate personnel with the appropriate level of knowledge, experience and training in the accounting policies, practices or internal control over financial reporting required of public companies. The development and implementation of the standards and controls and the hiring of experienced personnel necessary to achieve the level of accounting standards required of a public company may require greater costs than expected.
ChargePoint faces risks related to global epidemics and health pandemics which could have a material and adverse effect on its business and results of operations.
ChargePoint faces risks related to global epidemics and health pandemics, like what was experienced worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may create significant volatility in the global economy and may have a long-lasting adverse impact on ChargePoint and its industry. For instance, such epidemics may cause local, regional or national governments to implement measures to contain pandemic risks, such as travel restrictions, quarantines, shelter in place orders or business shutdowns. Any of these measures may adversely affect ChargePoint’s employees and operations and the operations of its customers, suppliers, vendors and business partners, and may negatively impact demand for EV charging stations, particularly at workplaces, or the supply of components necessary for the manufacture of charging stations.
For example, beginning in calendar year 2020, in response to the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic, ChargePoint modified its business practices by recommending that all non-essential personnel work from home and cancelling or reducing physical participation in sales activities, meetings, events and conferences. Subsequently, in May 2022, ChargePoint commenced a “return-to-office” plan, which included shifting to a hybrid model where employees have the flexibility to work from home or from the office. In the spring of 2023, ChargePoint further refined its hybrid model to require most employees to return to office at least three days a week, which ChargePoint has maintained. A hybrid work model may create challenges, including challenges maintaining ChargePoint’s corporate culture, increasing attrition or limiting ChargePoint’s ability to attract employees if individuals prefer to continue working full time at home. Future challenges related to ChargePoint’s hybrid work model or workplace practices could lead to attrition and difficulty attracting high-quality employees.
The effect of future health pandemics on ChargePoint’s business, prospects and results of operations will depend on their duration and sustained impact. Difficult macroeconomic conditions, such as supply shortages, increased inflation, increased and prolonged unemployment or a decline in consumer confidence as a result of pandemics, as well as reduced spending by businesses, could have a material adverse effect on the demand for ChargePoint’s products and services. The effect of, or even the threats of, a new global pandemic can also vary over time and across the geographies in which ChargePoint operates. For example, variations in “work-from-home” or “return-to-office” policies can cause fluctuations in ChargePoint’s revenues because conditions caused by global pandemics, such as more permanent work-from-home policies, are likely to continue affecting the rate of global infrastructure spending, and thus to adversely impact ChargePoint’s gross margins as ChargePoint’s commercial business tends to contribute higher gross margins than its residential and fleet businesses. Even after the acute impact from any pandemic has subsided, ChargePoint may continue to experience an adverse impact to its business as a result of the pandemic’s global economic impact, including any recession that has occurred or may occur in the future.
ChargePoint is highly reliant on its networked charging solution and information technology systems and data, and those of its service providers and component suppliers, any of which systems and data may be subject to cyber-attacks, service disruptions or other security incidents, which could result in data breaches, loss or interruption of services, intellectual property theft, claims, litigation, regulatory investigations, significant liability, reputational damage and other adverse consequences.
ChargePoint continues to expand its information technology systems in support of its networked charging solutions, and as its operations grow, its internal information technology systems, such as product data management, procurement, inventory management, production planning and execution, sales, services and logistics, financial, tax and regulatory compliance systems. This includes the implementation of new internally developed systems and the deployment of such systems in the United States and abroad. The implementation, maintenance, segregation and improvement of these systems require significant management time, support and cost, and there are inherent risks associated with developing, improving and expanding ChargePoint’s core systems as well as implementing new systems and updating current systems, including disruptions to the related areas of business operations. These risks may affect ChargePoint’s ability to manage its data and inventory, procure parts or supplies or manufacture, sell, deliver and service products, adequately protect its intellectual property or achieve and maintain compliance with, or realize available benefits under, tax laws and other applicable regulations.
While ChargePoint maintains information technology measures designed to protect it against intellectual property theft, data breaches, sabotage and other external or internal cyber-attacks or misappropriation, its systems and those of its service providers are potentially vulnerable to malware, ransomware, viruses, denial-of-service attacks, phishing attacks, social engineering, computer hacking, unauthorized access, exploitation of bugs, defects and vulnerabilities, breakdowns, damage, interruptions, system malfunctions, power outages, terrorism, acts of vandalism, security breaches, security incidents, inadvertent or intentional actions by employees or other third parties, and other cyber-attacks. Further, most of the networked charging systems ChargePoint sells are owned and operated by third-parties who are responsible for the physical safety of the charging stations. Failure on the part of ChargePoint’s customers to adequately assure the physical safety of charging stations may result in unauthorized access to ChargePoint’s systems or network. To the extent any security incident results in unauthorized access, or damage to, acquisition, use, corruption, loss, destruction, alteration or dissemination of ChargePoint data, including intellectual property and personal information, or ChargePoint products, or for it to be believed or reported that any of these occurred, it could disrupt ChargePoint’s business, harm its reputation, compel it to comply with applicable data breach notification laws, subject it to time consuming, distracting and expensive litigation, regulatory investigation and oversight, mandatory corrective action, require it to verify the correctness of database contents, or otherwise subject it to liability under laws, regulations and contractual obligations, including those that protect the privacy and security of personal information. This could result in increased costs to ChargePoint and result in significant legal and financial exposure and/or reputational harm.
Because ChargePoint also relies on third-party service providers, it cannot guarantee that its service providers’ and component suppliers’ systems have not been breached or that they do not contain exploitable defects, bugs, or vulnerabilities that could result in a security incident, or other disruption to, ChargePoint’s or ChargePoint’s service providers’ or component suppliers’ systems. ChargePoint’s ability to monitor its service providers’ and component suppliers’ security measures is limited, and, in any event, malicious third parties may be able to circumvent those security measures.
If ChargePoint does not successfully implement, maintain or expand its information technology systems as planned, its operations may be disrupted, its ability to accurately and/or timely report its financial results could be impaired and deficiencies may arise in its internal control over financial reporting, which may impact its ability to certify its financial results (see also “Financial, Tax and Accounting-Related Risks--ChargePoint previously identified material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting. If ChargePoint identifies additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fails to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, this may result in material misstatements contained within ChargePoint’s consolidated financial statements or cause ChargePoint to fail to meet its periodic reporting obligations.” for more detail). Moreover, ChargePoint’s proprietary information, including intellectual property and personal information, could be compromised or misappropriated, its reputation may be adversely affected if these systems or their functionality do not operate as expected and ChargePoint may be required to expend significant resources to make corrections or find alternative sources for performing these functions.
Computer malware, viruses, ransomware, hacking, phishing attacks and similar disruptions could result in security and privacy breaches and interruption in service, which could harm ChargePoint’s business.
From time to time, ChargePoint has experienced cyberattacks on its information technology infrastructure and systems. Computer malware, viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions could lead to interruption and delays in ChargePoint’s services and operations and loss, misuse or theft of data. Computer malware, viruses, ransomware, hacking and phishing attacks against online networks have become more prevalent and may occur on ChargePoint’s systems in the future. ChargePoint’s business may be subject to heightened risks of cyber intrusion as nation-state hackers seek access to technology used by the U.S. government and as criminal enterprise hackers, which may or may not be affiliated with foreign governments, use ransomware attacks to disable critical infrastructure and extort companies for ransom payments. Cyber security organizations in many countries have published warnings of increased cybersecurity threats to U.S. businesses, and external events, like the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, conflicts in the Middle East, or rising political tensions with China may increase the likelihood of cybersecurity attacks, particularly directed at energy, fueling or infrastructure service providers. ChargePoint has also been targeted by spear phishing attacks, in which an email directed at a specific individual or department is disguised to appear to be from a trusted source to obtain sensitive information. Any attempts by cyber attackers to disrupt ChargePoint’s services or systems, if successful, could harm its business, introduce liability to data subjects, result in the misappropriation of funds, be expensive to remedy, subject ChargePoint to substantial fines, penalties, damages and other liabilities under applicable laws and regulations, lead to a loss of protection of its intellectual property or trade secrets and damage its reputation or brand.
ChargePoint’s cyber-insurance coverage may not be sufficient to compensate for all liability relating to any actual or potential disruption or other security breach or incident. ChargePoint cannot be certain that its coverage will be adequate for liabilities actually incurred, that insurance will continue to be available to it on economically reasonable terms, or at all, or that any insurer will not deny coverage as to any future claim. The successful assertion of one or more large claims against ChargePoint that exceed available insurance coverage, or the occurrence of changes in ChargePoint’s insurance policies, including premium increases or the imposition of large deductible or co-insurance requirements, could have a material adverse effect on our business, including our financial condition, operating results, and reputation.
Efforts to prevent cyber attackers from entering computer systems are expensive to implement, and ChargePoint may not be able to cause the implementation or enforcement of such preventions with respect to its third-party vendors. Though it is difficult to determine what, if any, harm may directly result from any specific interruption or attack, any failure to maintain performance, reliability, security and availability of systems and technical infrastructure may, in addition to other losses, harm ChargePoint’s reputation, brand and ability to attract customers.
ChargePoint has previously experienced, and may in the future experience, service disruptions, outages and other performance problems due to a variety of factors, including infrastructure changes, third-party service providers, component supplier and manufacturer disruptions, human or software errors and capacity constraints. If ChargePoint’s services are unavailable when users attempt to access them, they may seek other services, which could reduce demand for ChargePoint’s solutions from target customers.
ChargePoint has processes and procedures in place designed to enable it to quickly recover from a disaster or catastrophe and continue business operations and has tested this capability under controlled circumstances. However, there are several factors ranging from human error to data corruption that could materially impact the efficacy of such processes and procedures, including by lengthening the time services are partially or fully unavailable to customers and users. It may be difficult or impossible to perform some or all recovery steps and continue normal business operations due to the nature of a particular disaster or catastrophe, especially during peak periods, which could cause additional reputational damages, or loss of revenue, any of which could adversely affect its business and financial results.
ChargePoint’s business is subject to risks associated with natural disastersdisasters, global epidemics, health pandemics and the adverse effects associated with climate change, including earthquakes, wildfires, or other types of natural disasters or resource shortages, including public safety power shut-offs that have occurred and may continue to occur in California, the effects of which could disrupt and harm its operations and those of ChargePoint’s customers.
ChargePoint faces risks related to global epidemics and health pandemics, like what was experienced worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may create significant volatility in the global economy and may have a long-lasting adverse impact on ChargePoint and its industry. For instance, such epidemics have in the past caused and may in the future cause local, regional or national governments to implement measures to contain pandemic risks, such as travel restrictions, quarantines, shelter in place orders or business shutdowns. Any of these measures, as was experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic, may adversely affect ChargePoint’s employees and operations and the operations of its customers, suppliers, vendors and business partners, and may negatively impact demand for EV charging stations, particularly at workplaces, or the supply of components necessary for the manufacture of charging stations.
ChargePointChargePoint’s conductsheadquarters aare majority of its operationslocated in the San Francisco Bay Area in an area projected to be vulnerable to future water scarcity and sea level rise due to climate change as well as in an active earthquake zone. The occurrence of a natural disaster such as an earthquake, drought, flood, fire (such as the increasingly frequent wildfires in California), localized extended outages of critical utilities (such as California’s public safety power shut-offs) or transportation systems, or any critical resource shortages could cause a significant interruption in its business, damage or destroy ChargePoint’s facilities or inventories, and cause it to incur significant costs, any of which could harm its business, financial condition and results of operations. The insurance ChargePoint maintains against fires, earthquakes and other natural disasters may not be adequate to cover losses in any particular case.
ChargePoint believes there are seasonal factors that may cause ChargePoint to record higher revenue in some quarters compared with others. A significant share of ChargePoint’s annual revenues are typically generated in the fourth fiscal quarter, which coincides with customers with a December 31 year-end choosing to spend remaining unused portions of their budgets. ChargePoint’s revenues have historically been lower in its first fiscal quarter than its preceding fourth quarter, which ChargePoint believes is due to, in part, unfavorable weather conditions which result in a decrease in construction activity during the winter months, periods of wet weather and times when other weather and climate conditions would impair construction activity. While ChargePoint believes it has visibility into the seasonality of its business, various factors, including difficult weather conditions (such as flooding, hurricanes, prolonged rain or periods of unseasonably cold temperatures or snowstorms) in any quarter, may materially and adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Gain on Debt Exchange”
Removed heading “Recent Developments”
Removed heading “September 2023 Reorganization”
Removed heading “January 2024 Reorganization”
Removed heading “September 2024 Reorganization”
Removed heading “New York Stock Exchange Delisting Notice”
Largest changes
“ChargePoint has an international presence and as a result is subject to risks and uncertainties caused by significant events with macroeconomic impacts, including, but not limited to geopolitical events, including the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, conflicts in the Middle East, rising political tensions with China, increases in inflation and interest rates, monetary policy changes, financial services sector instability, recessions, global pandemics and foreign currency fluctuations. …”see in full comparison
ChargePoint believes its revenue growth is tied to the number of passenger and commercial EVs sold, which it believes drives the demand for EV charging infrastructure. The market for EVs is still rapidly evolving and although demand for EVs has grown in recent years, the rate of EV sales is highly volatile and there is no guarantee of future demand for EVsee in full comparisonsales.sales, especially in the markets ChargePoint primarily services, such as North America and Europe. Factors impacting the adoption of EVs include but are not limited to:perceptions about EV features, quality, safety, performance and cost; perceptions about the limited range over which EVs may be driven on a single battery charge; volatility in the cost of oil and gasoline (including as a result of ongoing conflicts in the Middle East involving the United States, Iran, Israel and other Gulf States); availability of services for EVs; consumers’ perception about the convenience, reliability and cost of charging EVs; and increases in fuel efficiency of internal combustion engine vehicles. Further, numerous EV auto manufacturers have announced delays in or modified their previously announced plans to migrate their manufacturing production to be solely or primarily EVs.InForaddition, macroeconomic factors, including reduction or elimination of governmental mandates and incentives andexample, theimpactNorthofAmericanhigherEVinterestmarketrates,hasinflation,recentlytariffssufferedandaanysubstantialpotential economic recession, could impact demand for EVs, particularly since they can be more expensive to purchase than traditional gasoline-powered vehicles. Further, geopolitical factors, such as the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, conflictsdecline in theMiddlesaleEast,ofconflictsnewbetweenEVs since theUnitedterminationStates and China or between China and Taiwan may negatively impactof theglobal$7,500automotiveU.S.supplyfederalchaintaxandcreditreducein September 2025, resulting in quarterly declines of new EVs sold as compared to themanufacturingsameofquartersautomobiles,inincludingtheEVs.prior year. If the market for EVs does not develop as expected, if there is any slow-down or delay in overall EV adoption, or if auto manufacturers delay their EV manufacturing rates or eliminate their plans to transition to predominately EV manufacturing, the rate of EV adoption may be adversely affected and the market for EV charging may not develop as a result and ChargePoint’s financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely impacted.
“ChargePoint has an international presence and as a result is subject to risks and uncertainties caused by significant events with macroeconomic impacts, including, but not limited to geopolitical events, such as the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, conflicts in the Middle East involving the United States, Iran, Israel and other Gulf States, rising political tensions with China, fluctuations in inflation and interest rates, monetary policy changes, financial services sector instability, recessions, global pandemics and foreign currency fluctuations.”see in full comparison
“On February 19, 2025, ChargePoint received a notification letter from the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) that it is not in compliance with Section 802.01C of the NYSE Listed Company Manual (the “Bid Price Requirement”) because the average closing price of the Company’s common stock was less than $1.00 over a consecutive 30 trading-day period. …”see in full comparison
“In February 2026, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling striking down certain tariffs previously imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”). The ultimate availability, timing, and amount of any potential refunds of such tariffs remain highly uncertain and are subject to further legal, regulatory, and administrative developments. Following the Supreme Court’s decision, the U.S. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (79)
The following discussion and analysis provides information which ChargePoint’s management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of ChargePoint’s consolidated results of operations and financial condition. ChargePoint’s fiscal year ends on January 31. References to fiscal years 2026, 2025, 2024, and 2023,2024, relate to the fiscal years ended January 31, 2025,2026, January 31, 2024,2025, and January 31, 2023,2024, respectively. This section of this Form 10-K discusses fiscal year 20252026 and 20242025 items and year-to-year comparisons between fiscal year 20252026 and 2024.2025. Discussions of fiscal year 20232024 items and year-over-year comparisons between fiscal year 20242025 and fiscal year 20232024 are not included in this Form 10-K, and can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on AprilMarch 1,28, 2024.2025. The discussion should be read together with the consolidated financial statements and related notes that are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion may contain forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. ChargePoint’s actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” included under Part I, Item 1A.
ChargePoint generates revenue primarily through the sale of Networked Charging Systems, subscriptions to the ChargePoint Platform and extended parts and labor warranties (“Assure”). The Company also generates revenue, in some instances, by providing customers use of ChargePoint’s owned and operated Networked Charging Systems, ChargePoint Platform and Assure into a single multi-year or annual subscription (“ChargePoint as a Service” or “CPaaS”). Each of the ChargePoint Platform, Assure and CPaaS is typically paid for upfront and revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the subscription period.
On February 26, 2021 (“Closing Date”), Switchback Energy Acquisition Corporation (“Switchback”) consummated the previously announced transactions pursuant to which Lightning Merger Sub Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Switchback (“Lightning Merger Sub”), merged with ChargePoint, Inc. (“Legacy ChargePoint”) pursuant to a Business Combination Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of September 23, 2020, by and among Legacy ChargePoint, Lightning Merger Sub, and Switchback (“Merger Agreement”). Legacy ChargePoint survived as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Switchback (“Merger” and, collectively with the other transactions described in the Merger Agreement, the “Reverse Recapitalization”). Further, as a result of the Merger, Switchback was renamed “ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.”
Since its inception in 2007, ChargePoint has been engaged in developing and marketing its Networked Charging Systems, subscriptions and other offerings, raising capital and recruiting personnel. ChargePoint has incurred net operating losses and negative cash flows from operations in every year since its inception. As of January 31, 20252026 and 2024,2025, ChargePoint had an accumulated deficit of $1,891.4$2,111.6 million and $1,614.4$1,891.4 million, respectively. ChargePointThe hasCompany’s fundedprincipal sources of liquidity are its operationscash primarilyand cash equivalents, cash generated from customersales payments,to customers, debt financing (as described in Note 6, Debt), and sales of Common Stock under the issuance of common stock, redeemable convertible preferred stock2022 and convertible2025 notes,ATM exerciseFacility proceeds(as fromdefined optionsin andNote warrants,8, borrowingsCommon under loan facilities and proceeds from the Reverse Recapitalization.Stock).
Recent Developments
September 2023 Reorganization
In September 2023, the Company implemented a reorganization plan to reduce its operating expenses and increase efficiencies (the “September 2023 Reorganization”). The Reorganization entailed a reduction in force of approximately 10% of the Company’s global workforce at the time, and other actions to reduce expenses. During the twelve months ended January 31, 2024, the Company incurred $15.6 million of employee severance, termination and employment-related exit cost, as well as accelerated depreciation of right-of-use assets and other facilities and contract termination charges. As of January 31, 2025, restructuring-related liabilities were $0.3 million. The majority of the remaining restructuring-related liabilities, which includes employee severance and benefits and facilities-related exit costs, will be disbursed in fiscal 2026.
January 2024 Reorganization
In January 2024, the Company implemented an additional reorganization plan to reduce its operating expenses and further increase efficiencies (the “January 2024 Reorganization”). The January 2024 Reorganization entailed a reduction in force of approximately 12% of the Company’s global workforce and other actions to reduce expense. During the twelve months ended January 31, 2024, the Company incurred $9.9 million of employee severance, termination and employment-related exit costs and $2.7 million of facility exit costs, including impairment charges and accelerated depreciation of right-of-use assets. As of January 31, 2025, restructuring-related liabilities were $1.2 million. These remaining restructuring-related liabilities, which primarily includes employee severance and benefits, will be disbursed in fiscal 2026.
September 2024 Reorganization
In September 2024, the Company implemented a reorganization plan to reduce its operating expenses and further increase efficiencies (the “September 2024 Reorganization”). The September 2024 Reorganization entailed a reduction in force of approximately 15% of the Company’s global workforce and other actions to reduce expense. During the twelve months ended January 31, 2025, the Company incurred $9.8 million of employee severance, termination and employment-related exit costs. As of January 31, 2025, restructuring-related liabilities were $0.4 million. These remaining restructuring-related liabilities, which primarily includes employee severance and benefits, will be disbursed in fiscal 2026.
For more information related to the September 2023 Reorganization, January 2024 Reorganization and September 2024 Reorganization, refer to Note 14, Restructuring, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.
New York Stock Exchange Delisting Notice
On February 19, 2025, ChargePoint received a notification letter from the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) that it is not in compliance with Section 802.01C of the NYSE Listed Company Manual (the “Bid Price Requirement”) because the average closing price of the Company’s common stock was less than $1.00 over a consecutive 30 trading-day period. The Company can regain compliance at any time within the six-month period following receipt of the NYSE's notice or until August 19, 2025 (the “Compliance Date”), if on the last trading day of any calendar month prior to the Compliance Date, the Company has (i) a closing share price of at least $1.00 and (ii) an average closing share price of at least $1.00 over the 30 trading-day period ending on the last trading day of that month. The notification received from the NYSE has no immediate effect on ChargePoint’s NYSE listing. ChargePoint’s Common Stock will continue to be listed and trade on the NYSE at this time, subject to ChargePoint’s ongoing compliance with the NYSE's other continued listing standards.For additional information concerning the delisting notice, see the Risk Factors in Part 1, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K entitled, “Risks Related to Ownership of ChargePoint’s Securities--If ChargePoint fails to regain compliance with the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange it could result in the delisting of ChargePoint’s Common Stock and adversely affect the market price and liquidity of ChargePoint’s Common Stock.”
ChargePoint believes its revenue growth is tied to the number of passenger and commercial EVs sold, which it believes drives the demand for EV charging infrastructure. The market for EVs is still rapidly evolving and although demand for EVs has grown in recent years, the rate of EV sales is highly volatile and there is no guarantee of future demand for EV sales.sales, especially in the markets ChargePoint primarily services, such as North America and Europe. Factors impacting the adoption of EVs include but are not limited to: perceptions about EV features, quality, safety, performance and cost; perceptions about the limited range over which EVs may be driven on a single battery charge; volatility in the cost of oil and gasoline (including as a result of ongoing conflicts in the Middle East involving the United States, Iran, Israel and other Gulf States); availability of services for EVs; consumers’ perception about the convenience, reliability and cost of charging EVs; and increases in fuel efficiency of internal combustion engine vehicles. Further, numerous EV auto manufacturers have announced delays in or modified their previously announced plans to migrate their manufacturing production to be solely or primarily EVs. InFor addition, macroeconomic factors, including reduction or elimination of governmental mandates and incentives andexample, the impactNorth ofAmerican higherEV interestmarket rates,has inflation,recently tariffssuffered anda anysubstantial potential economic recession, could impact demand for EVs, particularly since they can be more expensive to purchase than traditional gasoline-powered vehicles. Further, geopolitical factors, such as the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, conflictsdecline in the Middlesale East,of conflictsnew betweenEVs since the Unitedtermination States and China or between China and Taiwan may negatively impactof the global$7,500 automotiveU.S. supplyfederal chaintax andcredit reducein September 2025, resulting in quarterly declines of new EVs sold as compared to the manufacturingsame ofquarters automobiles,in includingthe EVs.prior year. If the market for EVs does not develop as expected, if there is any slow-down or delay in overall EV adoption, or if auto manufacturers delay their EV manufacturing rates or eliminate their plans to transition to predominately EV manufacturing, the rate of EV adoption may be adversely affected and the market for EV charging may not develop as a result and ChargePoint’s financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely impacted.
ChargePoint has an international presence and as a result is subject to risks and uncertainties caused by significant events with macroeconomic impacts, including, but not limited to geopolitical events, such as the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, conflicts in the Middle East involving the United States, Iran, Israel and other Gulf States, rising political tensions with China, fluctuations in inflation and interest rates, monetary policy changes, financial services sector instability, recessions, global pandemics and foreign currency fluctuations.
In February 2026, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling striking down certain tariffs previously imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”). The ultimate availability, timing, and amount of any potential refunds of such tariffs remain highly uncertain and are subject to further legal, regulatory, and administrative developments. Following the Supreme Court’s decision, the U.S. federal government announced its intention to implement new tariffs and surcharges of up to 15% on imports from many of the same countries previously subject to IEEPA under separate authority, including Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. There remains substantial uncertainty regarding the duration of existing and newly announced tariffs and surcharges, potential changes or pauses to such tariffs, tariff levels, and whether further additional tariffs or other retaliatory actions may be imposed, modified, or suspended, and the impacts of such actions on ChargePoint’s business. ChargePoint continues to monitor and evaluate these developments and assess their potential impact on ChargePoint’s business, financial condition, and results of operations. Trade restrictions and increased tariffs between the United States and countries like China, Mexico and Canada may result in adverse economic conditions, increase the costs of goods sold and result in a recession or the threat of a recession.
In addition, the United States automotive manufacture industry is particularly sensitive to the impact of disruptions in supply chains as the result of geopolitical conflicts and tariffs on the increased costs of manufacturing and selling vehicles, which may result in substantial increases to the cost of vehicles to consumers, including EVs. Because ChargePoint is substantially reliant on the increased adoption and sales of new EVs, if there is any downturn in the sales of EVs or consumers reduce their purchases of new EVs, either because the vehicles are more expensive or as the result of a general downturn in the overall economy as the result of the conflicts in the Middle East and additional tariffs, ChargePoint’s customers may reduce their need for EV infrastructure development and ChargePoint’s business, financial results and results of operations may be harmed.
ChargePoint has an international presence and as a result is subject to risks and uncertainties caused by significant events with macroeconomic impacts, including, but not limited to geopolitical events, including the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, conflicts in the Middle East, rising political tensions with China, increases in inflation and interest rates, monetary policy changes, financial services sector instability, recessions, global pandemics and foreign currency fluctuations. In addition, in February 2025, the United States announced the imposition of tariffs on certain goods imported from Canada, Mexico and China and has made announcements regarding the potential imposition of tariffs on goods imported from other countries. Impacted countries have and in the future may impose retaliatory tariffs, and such actions could give rise to an escalation of other trade measures by the countries subjected to such tariffs. While the application of certain previously announced tariffs has been delayed, there is no guarantee that the tariffs will not go into effect and there is the possibility that additional United States tariffs may be imposed on Canada, Mexico, China and other countries. Trade restrictions and increased tariffs between the United States and countries like Canada, Mexico and China may result in adverse economic conditions, increase the costs of goods sold and result in a recession or the threat of a recession. For example, the United States automotive manufacture industry is particularly sensitive to the impact of tariffs on the increased costs of manufacturing and selling vehicles, which may result in substantial increases to the cost of vehicles to consumers, including EVs. Because ChargePoint is substantially reliant on the increased adoption and sales of new EVs, if there is any downturn in the sales of EVs or consumers reduce their purchases of new EVs, either because the vehicles are more expensive or as the result of a general downturn in the overall economy as the result of the tariffs, ChargePoint’s customers may reduce their need for EV infrastructure development and ChargePoint’s business, financial results and results of operations may be harmed.
ChargePoint is currently a market leader in North America in commercial Level 2 Alternating Current (“AC”) charging. ChargePoint also offers AC chargers for use at home or multifamily settings and for fleet applications, and high-power Level 3 Direct Current (“DC”) chargers for fast urban charging, corridor or long-trip charging and fleet applications. ChargePoint intends to expand its market share over time in its product categories, leveraging the network effect of its products and ChargePoint Platform. Existing competitors may expand their product offerings and sales strategies, and new competitors may enter the market. Historically, ChargePoint has sold its Networked Charging Systems and charger management system (“CMS” or “CMS Services”) as an integrated “full-stack” offering, providing its customers with a sole-source solution for their EV charging needs, especially in the United States. Recently,At ChargePoint has seen an increase in the frequency oftimes, customers seekingseek to disaggregate their networked charging solutions and to implement independent hardware and charging management software solutions, particularly for national or global commercial retailers and large fleet operators. While ChargePoint enables Networked Charging System owners to choose ChargePoint’s CMS Services and select their choice of third-party hardware, there is no guarantee that this distributed sales model will be successful. If ChargePoint’s market share decreases due to increased competition, or if ChargePoint is unable to compete with a disaggregated EV charging solutions sales model, its financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely impacted. Furthermore, ChargePoint’s success could be negatively impacted if consumers and businesses choose other types of alternative fuel vehicles or high fuel-economy gasoline powered vehicles.
As ChargePoint introduces new products its gross margins may be initially negatively impacted by launch costs and lower sales volumes until it achieves targeted cost reductions. Cost reductions may not occur on the timeline ChargePoint expects due to a number of factors, including but not limited to failure to meet its own estimates, unanticipated supply chain difficulties, government mandates or certification requirements. In recent quarters, ChargePoint has maintained elevated levels of inventory, and ChargePoint is also preparing for the introduction of its next generation AC and DC Networked Charging System models, which increases the complexity of inventory management and heightens the risk that certain existing products or components may become excess, obsolete, or subject to inventory write‑downs. In addition, ChargePoint may accelerate its expenditures where it sees growth opportunities, which may negatively impact gross margin until upfront costs and inefficiencies are absorbed and normalized operations are achieved. Further, ChargePoint has historically invested in prioritizing an assurance of supply of its products and new customer acquisition, which puts pressure on gross margins and increases operating expenses. ChargePoint also continuously evaluates and may adjust its expenditures, such as new product introduction costs, based on its launch plans for new products, as well as other factors including the pace and prioritization of current projects under development and the addition of new projects. As ChargePoint attains higher revenue, it expects operating expenses as a percentage of total revenue to decrease as it scales and focuses on increasing operational efficiency and process automation.
For example, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act signed into law on November 15, 2021 provided additional funding for EVs and EV charging infrastructure through the creation of new programs and grants and the expansion of existing programs, including the $7.5 billion National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (“NEVI”) Program for EV charging along highway corridors. On FebruaryAugust 6,11, 2025, the Federal Highway Administration (“FHWA)”) published a memo indicatingissued new guidance, updating prior guidance forwhich previously froze federal funds tied to NEVI willand bedirected issuedstates into file updated implementation plans within 30 days. FHWA has since approved the spring of 2025, which may change program requirements, state plans,plans and qualificationsstates forare futuremoving awards.forward Inwith addition,their NEVI programs. Separately, the InflationOne ReductionBig Beautiful Bill Act of 2022 (the “IRAOBBBA”) was signed into law on AugustJuly 16,4, 20222025, includeswhich numerousset incentivesnew andend taxdates credits aimed at reducing the effects of climate change, such as the extension and increase offor the EV charging infrastructure tax credits previously made available under Section 30C and tax credits for EVs under Section 30D of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) through 2032.amended. In Januaryparticular, 2025,the PresidentOBBBA Trumpterminated directedthe review$7,500 ofnew theseclean incentivesvehicle throughtax ancredit executivefor order,all new EVs sold after September 30, 2025. This and Congress may take action to change or revoke the IRA incentives and tax credits, including those available under Section 30C and Section 30D of the Code. Anyany other reduction in rebates, tax credits or other financial incentives for EVs or EV charging stations could materially reduce the demand for EVs and ChargePoint’s solutions and, as a result, may adversely impact ChargePoint’s business and expansion potential.
Financial results for the year ended January 31, 20252026 in this report differ from those included in our earnings release issued on March 5,4, 20252026 in that theDebt, earningscurrent didwas notoverstated reflectby $5.8$1.9 million impactand onDebt, interestnoncurrent expensewas relatedunderstated toby PIKthe Interestsame fairamount valuein the Preliminary Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of January 31, 2026 that we identified subsequent to the issuance of our earnings release. For more information related to the 20282025 ConvertibleSenior Notes,Loan, refer to Note 6, Debt, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.
Networked Charging Systems revenue includes the deliveries of EV charging system infrastructure, which include a range of AC products for use in residential, commercial and fleet applications, and DC, or fast-charge products for use in commercial and fleet applications, as well as fees received for transferring regulatory incentives earned for participating in low carbon fuel programs. ChargePoint generally recognizes revenue from sales of Networked Charging Systems upon shipment to customers, including distributors, resellers or direct sales customers as these customers obtain title and control over these products. Revenue is adjusted for estimated returns. Revenue from regulatory incentives is recognized when the regulatory incentives are transferred.
Subscriptions revenue consists of revenue from ChargePoint Platform software as a service,software, Assure extended maintenance plans, and CPaaS, which combines the customer’s use of ChargePoint’s owned and operated systemsNetworked Charging Systems with CMSthe ChargePoint Platform and Assure programs into a single, typically multi-year subscription.
In some instances, CPaaS subscriptions are considered for accounting purposes to contain a lease for the customer’s use of ChargePoint’s owned and operated systemsNetworked Charging Systems unless the location allows the customer to receive incremental economic benefit from regulatory credits earned on that EV charging system. Lessor revenue relates to operating leases and historically has not been material. Subscriptions revenue is generally recognized over time on a straight-line basis as ChargePoint has an ongoing obligation to deliver such services to the customer.
ChargePoint has seen its revenue fluctuate based on market demand and other factors, and expects this variability of growth in Networked Charging Systems revenue to continue in the near term. In the long termterm, it expects revenue to grow in both Networked Charging Systems and subscriptions due to increased demand in EVs and the related charging infrastructure market.
Networked Charging Systems revenue decreased for fiscal year ended January 31, 2025 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2024, primarily due to lower volume of Networked Charging systems delivered across all of ChargePoint’s product families, with the most significant decline in the DC product families.
Subscriptions revenue increased for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2025 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2024 primarily due to the growth in the number of ChargePoint Platform subscriptions and Assure subscriptions for Networked Charging Systems connected to ChargePoint’s network.
OtherNetworked Charging Systems revenue increaseddecreased for the fiscal year ended January 31, 20252026 compared to the fiscal year ended January 31, 20242025, primarily due to the increase in charging sessionlower volume atof networkedNetworked chargingCharging systems.Systems delivered across ChargePoint’s major product families.
Subscriptions revenue increased for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2026 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2025 primarily due to the growth in the number of ChargePoint Platform subscriptions and Assure subscriptions for Networked Charging Systems connected to ChargePoint’s network.
Other revenue decreased for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2026 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2025 primarily due to one-time service revenues, lower collections on driver charging sessions due to unpaid charging sessions and fraudulent activities related to charging payment services. .
Cost of Networked Charging Systems revenue decreased during the fiscal year ended January 31, 20252026 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 20242025 primarily due to a year-over-year decline in the number of Networked Charging Systems delivered and the absence of the $70.0 million inventory impairment charges recorded in fiscal year ended January 31, 2024.delivered.
Cost of subscriptions revenue marginally decreased for fiscal year ended January 31, 2025 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2024.
Cost of othersubscriptions revenue increaseddecreased for the fiscal year ended January 31, 20252026 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 20242025 primarily due to highera driver-relateddecrease processingin costsAssure onrelated Networkedhardware Charging Stations.costs.
Cost of other revenue increased for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2026 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2025 primarily due to higher driver-related processing costs on Networked Charging Systems.
Gross profit is revenue less cost of revenue and gross margin is gross profit as a percentage of revenue. ChargePoint offers a range of Networked Charging Systems products which vary widely in selling price and associated gross margin, as, for example, ChargePoint’s AC charger based commercial business contributes higher margins than its residential and DC charger based fleet businesses. Accordingly, ChargePoint’s gross profit and gross margin have varied and are expected to continue to vary from period to period due to revenue levels; geographic, vertical and product mix; new product transition costs; and its efforts to optimize its operations and supply chain and purchase price variances.
In the long term, improvements in ChargePoint’s gross profit and gross margin will depend on its ability to continue to optimize its operationsoperations, inventory and supply chain as it increases its revenue. However, at least in the short term, as the product mix continues to vary and as ChargePoint continues to align inventory supply with demand and optimize for customer acquisition, launches new Networked Charging Systems products, grows its presence in Europe where it has not yet achieved economies of scale, and expands its solutions for its fleet customers, gross margin will vary from period to period.
Gross profit increased for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2025 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2024 primarily due to the growing gross profits from subscriptions driven by ChargePoint expanding its Networked Charging Systems, and the absence of the $70.0 million inventory impairment charges recorded in fiscal year ended January 31, 2024, partially offset by the lower volume of Networked Charging Systems delivered.
Gross profit and gross margin increased for the fiscal year ended January 31, 20252026 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 20242025 primarily due to thean absenceincrease in subscription revenue growth as a percentage of thetotal $70.0revenue millionand inventory impairment charges recordedimprovement in fiscalsubscription year ended January 31, 2024.margins.
Research and development expenses decreased during the fiscal year ended January 31, 20252026 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 20242025 primarily due to thea Company’s reorganization plans resulting in decreases of $42.5$5.1 million decrease in payroll related expenses (seeand Notea 14,$5.9 Restructuring,million decrease in thestock-based notescompensation toexpenses, theoffset consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for more details),by a decrease of $16.9$7.3 million increase in engineering materials and services costs, decreaseand ofa $13.9$2.1 million in stock-based compensation expenses, and decrease of $5.8 millionincrease in other operatingconsulting expenses.
Sales and marketing expenses decreased during the fiscal year ended January 31, 20252026 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 20242025 primarily due to the Company’s reorganization plans resulting ina decrease of $9.1 million in payroll related expenses (see Note 14, Restructuring, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for more details), decreases of $7.1$17.0 millionmillion, decrease in stock-based compensation expenses,expenses $4.0of million$4.8 million, and a decrease in consulting expenses, and $3.8 million inother marketing andrelated travel expenses, partially offset by an increaseexpenses of $4.7$8.4 million in allowance for credit loss.million.
General and administrative expenses increased during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2026 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2025, primarily due to an increase in non-recurring transactions relating to mainly litigation and settlement costs of $13.6 million and increase in facilities related and other expenses of $3.1 million, offset by a decrease in payroll related expenses of $2.4 million.
Gain on Debt Exchange
* not meaningful
ChargePoint recognized a gain on debt exchange of $11.2 million during the year ended January 31, 2026, representing the gain resulting from the Exchange Transaction (as described below). See Note 6. Debt in Part II, Item 8 in the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.
General and administrative expenses decreased during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2025 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2024, primarily due to the Company’s reorganization plans resulting in decreases of $19.7 million in stock-based compensation expenses, and $8.7 million in payroll related expenses, (see Note 14, Restructuring, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for more details), as well as a decrease of $7.0 million in consulting expenses, partially offset by an increase of $7.9 million in other non-recurring operating expenses.
Interest expense increaseddecreased during the fiscal year ended January 31, 20252026 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 20242025 primarily due to increaseda interestdecrease ratein onoutstanding debt as a result of the 2028debt ConvertibleExchange Notes after the amendment in October 2023.Transaction. For more information, see Note 6, Debt, in Part II, Item 8 in the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.
Other expense,income, net increased during the fiscal year ended January 31, 20252026 as compared to the fiscal year ended January 31, 20242025 due to unfavorablefavorable changes in foreign exchange rates.
ChargePoint’s provision for (benefit from) income taxes consists of federal, state and foreign income taxes based on enacted federal, state and foreign tax rates, as adjusted for allowable credits, deductions, uncertain tax positions, changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities and changes in tax law. Due to the level of historical losses, ChargePoint maintains a valuation allowance against U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets as it has concluded it is more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will not be realized.
The provision for (benefit from) income taxes increaseddid not materially fluctuate during the fiscal year ended January 31, 20252026 as compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2024 primarily due to reserves for uncertain tax positions.2025.
ChargePoint’s primary sources of liquidity are its cash and cash equivalents, cash generated from sales to customers, and debt financing.
ChargePoint’s primary requirements for liquidity and capital are to finance working capital, inventory management, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes. ChargePoint expects these needs to continue as ChargePoint develops and grows its business. ChargePoint has incurred net losses and negative cash flows from operations since its inception, which it anticipates will continue for the foreseeable future.
Historical Sources of Liquidity
ChargePoint has incurred net losses and negative cash flows from operations since its inception, which it anticipates will continue for the foreseeable future. To date, ChargePoint has funded its business and past acquisitions primarily with proceeds from the issuance of common stock, redeemable convertible preferred stock, proceeds from the Merger, proceeds from warrant and option exercises for cash, convertible debt and from customer payments. As of January 31, 20252026 and 2024,2025, ChargePoint had cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash of $225.0$142.0 million and $357.8$225.0 million, respectively. ChargePoint believes that its cash on hand and cash generated from sales to customers will satisfy its working capital and capital requirements for at least the next twelve months.
2025 Credit Agreement
On November 14, 2025, ChargePoint entered into a privately negotiated exchange agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with certain holders (the “Exchanging Holders”) of its outstanding 2028 Convertible Notes. Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, the Company exchanged $328.6 million of aggregate capitalized principal amount of the 2028 Convertible Notes for the following consideration (the “Exchange Transaction”): (i) $186.5 million in aggregate principal amount under a new Credit and Security Agreement (the “2025 Credit Agreement”), (ii) $25.0 million in cash, and (iii) warrants to purchase up to 1,671,000 shares of ChargePoint’s common stock at an exercise price of $25.00 per share (the “2025 Warrants”). ChargePoint did not receive any cash proceeds from the Exchange Transaction. Following the consummation of the Exchange Transaction, $11.3 million in capitalized principal amount of 2028 Convertible Notes remains outstanding. The Exchange Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants of ChargePoint and the Exchanging Holders. For more information about the Exchange Transaction see Note 6, Debt in Part II, Item 8, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report.
On July 27, 2023, the Company entered into a revolving credit agreement by and among the Company, ChargePoint, Inc. (the “Borrower”), certain subsidiaries of the Borrower as guarantors, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the other lenders party thereto which provided for a senior secured revolving credit facility in an initial aggregate principal amount of up to $150.0 million, with a maturity date of January 1, 2027 (the “2027 Revolving Credit Facility”). As of the closing of the 2025 Credit Agreement, ChargePoint had no borrowings outstanding under the 2027 Revolving Credit Facility, and in connection with the consummation of the 2025 Credit Agreement, ChargePoint terminated the 2027 Revolving Credit Facility. For more information about the 2027 Revolving Credit Facility see Note 6, Debt in Part II, Item 8, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report.
Prior to the Notes Amendment, the Original Convertible Notes bore interest at 3.50% per annum, to the extent paid in cash (“Cash Interest”), which was payable semi-annually in arrears on April 1st and October 1st of each year or 5.00% per annum through the issuance of additional Original Convertible Notes. The 2028 Convertible Notes bear Cash Interest at 7.00% per annum or 8.50% per annum through the issuance of additional 2028 Convertible Notes (“PIK Interest”). The 2028 Convertible Notes are convertible, based on the applicable conversion rate, into cash, shares of ChargePointChargePoint’s Common Stock or a combination thereof, at ChargePoint’s election. The initial conversion rate of the 2028 Convertible Notes is 83.33334.1667 shares of Common Stock per $1,000 principal amountamount, ofwhich theis 2028 Convertible Notes, subjectequivalent to customary anti-dilution adjustment in certain circumstances, which represents an initiala conversion price of approximately $12.00$240.00 per share.share of Common Stock.
ForOn additionalNovember details14, on2025, ChargePoint entered into the NotesExchange AmendmentAgreement. andFollowing the consummation of the Exchange Transaction, $11.3 million in capitalized principal amount of 2028 Convertible Notes referremains tooutstanding. For more information about the Exchange Transaction see Note 6, Debt,Debt in ChargePoint’sPart II, Item 8, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
Largest changes
ChargePoint also derives othersee in full comparisonrevenuerevenue, as set forth on its condensed consolidated statements ofoperationsoperations, from regulatorycredits.credits, such as from the Canadian Clean Fuel Regulation (“CCFR”). If government support of these credits declines, or if the requirements of such programs are modified or tightened, ChargePoint’s ability to generate this other revenue in the future would be adversely affected.InCertainyearsregulatorypriorcredit programs, such as the CCFR, also impose ongoing compliance obligations, including requirements tofiscalreinvestyearcredit2021,proceedsChargePointintoderivedthea slight majorityexpansion ofitscharging infrastructure, which constrain ChargePoint'’ use of those funds for other business purposes and increase administrative costs associated with tracking and demonstrating compliance. Failure to satisfy such reinvestment or other program requirements could result in penalties, credit clawbacks or disqualification from future credit generation, any of which could reduce ChargePoint’s other revenuefromandregulatoryadverselycredits.affectHowever,itsrevenuebusinessfromandthis source as a percentageresults ofother and total revenue has declined in recent quarters and it may continue to decline over time.operations. Further, the availability and value of such credits may decline regardless of the levels of general governmental support of the transition to EV infrastructure.
see in full comparisonIn February 2026, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling striking down certain tariffs previously imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”). Following the Supreme Court’s decision, theThe U.S. federal governmentannouncedhasitsimposed,intentionandtomayimplementinnewthe future impose, modify, suspend, or eliminate tariffs and surchargesof up to 15%on imports frommanyvarious countries under one or more statutory authorities, including but not limited to executive trade powers and applicable provisions oftheU.S.sametradecountries previously subject to IEEPA under separate authority, including Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.law. There remains substantial uncertainty regarding the duration of existing and newly announced tariffs and surcharges, potential changes or pauses to such tariffs, tariff levels, and whether further additional tariffs or other retaliatory actions may be imposed, modified, or suspended, and the impacts of such actions on ChargePoint’s business. Trade restrictions and increased tariffs between the United States and countries like Canada, Mexico, China and members of the EU may result in adverse economic conditions, increase the costs of goods sold and result in a recession or the threat of a recession. For example, the United States automotivemanufacturemanufacturing industry is particularly sensitive to the impact of tariffs on the increased costs of manufacturing and selling vehicles, which may result in substantial increases to the cost of vehicles to consumers, including EVs. Because ChargePoint is substantially reliant on the increased adoption and sales of new EVs, if there is any downturn in the sales of EVs or consumers reduce their purchases of new EVs, either because the vehicles are more expensive or as the result of a general downturn in the overall economy, ChargePoint’s customers may reduce their need for EV infrastructure development and ChargePoint’s business, financial results and results of operations may be harmed.
“In addition, the emerging development and deployment of autonomous vehicle fleets may present distinct challenges to ChargePoint. Autonomous fleet operators have charging requirements that differ materially from those of traditional fleet operators, including the need for high-throughput, and depot-based charging infrastructure capable of supporting continuous vehicle utilization with minimal downtime. …”see in full comparison
ChargePoint, ChargePoint’s subsidiary, ChargePoint, Inc. (the “Borrower”), and certain subsidiaries of ChargePoint as guarantors (the “Subsidiary Guarantors,” and together with ChargePoint and the Borrower, the “Credit Parties”) entered into a Credit and Security Agreement on November 14, 2025 with Alter Domus (US) LLC, as administrative agent and collateral agent, and the lenders party thereto, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Credit and Security Agreement, datedsee in full comparisonApril,April 23, 2026, (collectively, the “2025 Credit Agreement”). The 2025 Credit Agreement provides for the 2025 Senior Loan in an initial aggregate principal amount of $186.5 million. The 2025 Senior Loan matures on January 31, 2030 and does not amortize, except as described below. In accordance with the 2025 Credit Agreement, the Borrowerprepaidwas obligated to pay up to an aggregate of $30.0 million of the 2025 SeniorLoansLoan in twoequalinstallmentsoforiginally$15.0 million each, the first of which occurreddue on November 24,2025,2025 andtheFebruarysecond16, 2026 (each such date, a “Prepayment Date”), pursuant to a formulaic repayment measure based on volume-weighted average price per share ofwhichCommonoccurredStock for the thirty consecutive trading days preceding the applicable Prepayment Date. The Company made separate payments of $14.8 million and $9.6 million onFebruarythe17,respective2026.Prepayment Dates in connection with the repayment of the 2025 Credit Agreement with resulting gains of $0.2 million and $5.4 million, respectively, reflected in other income. The remaining 2025 Senior Loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 12.00% per annum, payable quarterly. For each of the first four quarterly interest payment dates, the Borrower may elect to pay in Interest Shares, valued based on the 30-day trailing volume-weighted average price (“VWAP”) preceding the applicable interest payment date. Issuance of Interest Shares is subject to a cap of 19.99% of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock to comply with NYSE listing requirements, unless stockholder approval is obtained.
ChargePoint incurred net losses of $220.2 million for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2026 and had net loss ofsee in full comparison$43.2$78.8 million for thethreesix months endedAprilJuly30,31, 2026. As ofAprilJuly30,31, 2026, ChargePoint had an accumulated deficit of$2,154.8$2,190.5 million. ChargePoint incurred negative cash flows from operating activities of$36.6$40.8 million for thethreesix months endedAprilJuly30,31, 2026.
see in full comparisonChargePoint’s future revenue growth will depend in significant part on its ability to increase sales of its products and services to fleet operators.The electrification of traditional fleets is an emerging market, and fleet operators may not adopt EVs on a widespread basis and on the timelines ChargePoint anticipates. In addition to the factors affecting the growth of the EV market generally, transitioning to an EV fleet can be costly and capital intensive, which could result in slower than anticipated adoption. The sales cycle could also be longer for sales to fleet operators, as they are often larger organizations, with more formal procurement processes than smaller commercial site hosts. Fleet operators may also require significant additional services and support, and if ChargePoint is unable to provide such services and support, it may adversely affect its ability to attract additional fleet operators as customers. Any failure to attract and retain fleet operators as customers in the future would adversely affect ChargePoint’s business and results of operations.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (37)
•ChargePoint’s future revenue growth will depend in significant part on its ability to increase sales of its products and services to fleet operators.operators, including autonomous fleets.
ChargePoint incurred net losses of $220.2 million for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2026 and had net loss of $43.2$78.8 million for the threesix months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026. As of AprilJuly 30,31, 2026, ChargePoint had an accumulated deficit of $2,154.8$2,190.5 million. ChargePoint incurred negative cash flows from operating activities of $36.6$40.8 million for the threesix months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026.
ChargePoint believes it will continue to incur significant operating expenses and net losses in future quarters for the near term. There can be no assurance that it will be able to achieve or maintain profitability in the future. ChargePoint’s potential profitability is particularly dependent upon the continued adoption of EVs by consumers and fleet operators and the widespread adoption of electric fleets and other electric transportation modalities, each of which are still in the early stages of widespread adoption and may not occur with the volume and timing that ChargePoint expects. For instance, the North American EV market has recently suffered a substantial decline in the sale of new EVs since the termination of the $7,500 U.S. federal tax credit in September 2025, resulting in quarterly declines of new EVs sold as compared to the same quarters in the prior year.periods. Any prolonged decrease in demand for new EVs or networked charging systems (“Networked Charging Systems”), or any delays in discretionary purchases of EV infrastructure, such as charging stations, by commercial, fleet or residential consumers may result in slowing growth or decreased revenue for ChargePoint which may adversely affect its gross margins and could materially adversely affect ChargePoint’s business and results of operations.
ChargePoint has encountered, and will continue to encounter, risks and uncertainties frequently experienced by growing companies in evolving industries. In addition, ChargePoint’s future growth rate is subject to a number of uncertainties, such as general economic and market conditions. In particular, ChargePoint has limited experience operating its business at its current scale under economic conditions characterized by high inflation, imposition of domestic and foreign tariffs, or in recessionary or uncertain economic environments. General economic and market conditions, consumer preferences, market demand, governmental and legislative initiatives or lack thereof, may diminish the rate of EV adoption or result in delays by EV manufacturers to transition their manufacturing to mostly or exclusively electric vehicles or cause EV manufacturers to eliminate their plans to transition to predominatelypredominantly EV manufacturing, and if such factors exist or persist, the demand for ChargePoint’s products and services could be adversely affected. If ChargePoint’s assumptions regarding these risks and uncertainties are incorrect or change in reaction to changes in the market or the economy, or if ChargePoint does not address these risks successfully, ChargePoint’s results of operations could differ materially from its expectations, and ChargePoint’s business, results of operations, and financial condition would be adversely affected.
ChargePoint derives a substantial portion of its overall revenue from the sale of its Networked Charging Systems. ChargePoint believes the penetration of EVs in the United States and Europe is heavily reliant on EV availability, consumer adoption of EVs, the availability and reliability of EV infrastructure and government mandates and incentive programs tied to EV adoption. Any sustained downturn in demand for EVs or EV infrastructure, such as decreased demand in EV charging stations, would harm ChargePoint’s business. For example, increased interest rates, an overall slowdown in economic activity, a recession or the possibility of a recession in the United States or Europe, elimination of government mandates and incentive programs, and increased tariffs, especially those targeted at the automotive industry may decrease the overall demand for EVs or EV infrastructure such as ChargePoint’s Networked Charging Systems. For instance, the North American EV market has recently suffered a substantial decline in the sale of new EVs since the termination of the $7,500 U.S. federal tax credit in September 2025, resulting in quarterly declines of new EVs sold as compared to the same quarters in the prior year.periods. Any prolonged decrease in demand for new EVs or Networked Charging Systems, or any delays in discretionary purchases of EV infrastructure, such as charging stations, by commercial, fleet or residential consumers may result in slowing growth or decreased revenue for ChargePoint which may adversely affect its gross margins and could materially adversely affect ChargePoint’s business and results of operations.
ChargePoint seeks to maintain sufficient levels of inventory in order to avoid supply interruptions and keep sufficient amounts of finished products on hand while also avoiding accumulating excess inventory which increases working capital needs and lowers gross margin. In recent quarters, ChargePoint has maintained elevated levels of inventory, and ChargePoint is also preparing for the introduction of its next generation AC and DC Networked Charging System models, which increases the complexity of inventory management and heightens the risk that certain existing products or components may become excess, obsolete, or subject to inventory write‑downs. To ensure adequate inventory supply and manage ChargePoint's operations with its third-party manufacturers and suppliers, ChargePoint forecasts material requirements and demand for its products in order to predict future inventory needs and then places orders with its suppliers based on these predictions. ChargePoint's ability to accurately forecast demand for its products could be negatively affected by many factors, including rapid or slowing growth, failure to accurately manage ChargePoint's expansion strategy, new product introductions by ChargePoint or its competitors, an increase or decrease in customer demand for ChargePoint products, ChargePoint's failure to accurately forecast customer acceptance of new products, unanticipated changes in general market conditions or regulatory matters, and the weakening of economic conditions or consumer confidence in future economic conditions. The introduction of new AC and DC products may further increase these risks, as demand for legacy products may decline more rapidly than anticipated, channel partners or customers may delay purchases in anticipation of newer offerings, or certain components or finished goods may not be usable across product generations. In addition, the majority of ChargePoint’s products are sold through its channel partners, distributors and resellers and, as a result, ChargePoint is highly reliant on the sales forecasting, sell-through activities and inventory management of its channel partners. If ChargePoint’s channel partners are not effective or efficient in forecasting sales, or sales of particular products, or managing their inventory levels or sell-through expectations then ChargePoint’s management of inventory levels, sales forecasts and parts ordering may be adversely affected which may harm ChargePoint’s financial conditionscondition and results of operations.
ChargePoint’s agreements with its channel partners are non-exclusive and do not prohibit them from working with ChargePoint’s competitors or offering competing solutions, and some of ChargePoint’s channel partners may have more established relationships with ChargePoint’s competitors. Similarly, ChargePoint’s channel partners have no obligations to renew their agreements with ChargePoint on commercially reasonable terms or at all, and certain of the agreements governing these relationships may be terminated by either party at any time, with no or limited notice. Further, in May 2025, ChargePoint announced a strategic partner relationship with Eaton Corporation (“Eaton”), an industry leading power management company, to facilitate sales and distribution of ChargePoint’s products and services through Eaton’s channel network, as well as collaborate on new product development to optimize value to end users. The utilization of the Eaton’s channel network may result in higher concentration of a material amount of channel sales through Eaton’s network, with ChargePoint continuing to maintain relationships with channel distributors, including in training and sales support. If ChargePoint fails to execute or perform its obligations under the strategic relationship or Eaton fails to meet its sales targets, execute marketing strategies, or successfully execute sales processes, ChargePoint’s reputation, customer relationships, revenue and financial performance could be adversely affected.
ChargePoint’s business depends on the economic health of its current and prospective customers and overall demand for EV charging infrastructure. In addition, the purchase of ChargePoint products and services is often discretionary and typically involves a significant commitment of capital and other resources. The United States, the European Union (“EU”), and the United Kingdom have recently experienced recently higher levels of inflation. In response, and due to recession fears, the U.S. Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, and the Bank of England have in the past raised and have indicated they may maintain higher interest rates and implement fiscal policy interventions. While these interventions have resulted in lowering inflation in recent quarters, there is no guarantee that these measures will maintain lower inflation and it may be necessary for central banks to increase interestsinterest rates again in the future in the event high levels of inflation resume. These actions may also reduce economic growth rates, create a recession, and have other similar effects.
In February 2026, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling striking down certain tariffs previously imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”). Following the Supreme Court’s decision, theThe U.S. federal government announcedhas itsimposed, intentionand tomay implementin newthe future impose, modify, suspend, or eliminate tariffs and surcharges of up to 15% on imports from manyvarious countries under one or more statutory authorities, including but not limited to executive trade powers and applicable provisions of theU.S. sametrade countries previously subject to IEEPA under separate authority, including Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.law. There remains substantial uncertainty regarding the duration of existing and newly announced tariffs and surcharges, potential changes or pauses to such tariffs, tariff levels, and whether further additional tariffs or other retaliatory actions may be imposed, modified, or suspended, and the impacts of such actions on ChargePoint’s business. Trade restrictions and increased tariffs between the United States and countries like Canada, Mexico, China and members of the EU may result in adverse economic conditions, increase the costs of goods sold and result in a recession or the threat of a recession. For example, the United States automotive manufacturemanufacturing industry is particularly sensitive to the impact of tariffs on the increased costs of manufacturing and selling vehicles, which may result in substantial increases to the cost of vehicles to consumers, including EVs. Because ChargePoint is substantially reliant on the increased adoption and sales of new EVs, if there is any downturn in the sales of EVs or consumers reduce their purchases of new EVs, either because the vehicles are more expensive or as the result of a general downturn in the overall economy, ChargePoint’s customers may reduce their need for EV infrastructure development and ChargePoint’s business, financial results and results of operations may be harmed.
In addition to the tariffs, the United States has imposed extensive export controls, targeted primarily at the semiconductor industry, in China. China has in the past and may in the future retaliate to such measures. If China imposes retaliatory tariffs, or if there is a conflict between China and Taiwan, which is a leading producer of semiconductors, there could be further disruption to the semiconductor industry and global supply chains. ChargePoint or the suppliers it procures components from may be unable to manufacture products at prices ChargePoint’s customers would accept, or at all. Any inability to pass on future increased costs to customers would put downward pressure on ChargePoint’s gross margins and adversely affect ChargePoint’s business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, while ChargePoint has not yet experienced a direct impact to its supply chain due to geopolitical conflicts, ChargePoint may experience an impact in the future due to increased fuel and shipping costs, limited supply of, or tariffs imposed on, components or replacement parts used by ChargePoint in its manufacturing process or the automotive industry in general, and delays caused by changes to global shipping routes and logistics. Such adverse impacts on ChargePoint’s supply chain could limit its ability to manufacture and sell its products on a timely and cost-effective basis and adversely affect its gross margins, which could materially adversely affect ChargePoint’s business and results of operations.
In recent quarters, ChargePoint has announced a series of reorganization plans that were independently adopted (the “Reorganizations”), including the March 2026 Reorganization and July 2026 Reorganization described in Note 5, Restructuring in Part I, Item 1, “Financial Statements” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The March 2026 Reorganization wasand July 2026 Reorganization were intended to improve operational efficiencies and operating costs and better align ChargePoint’s workforce with current business needs, top strategic priorities, and key growth opportunities. ChargePoint may not realize, in full or in part, the anticipated benefits and savings from the Reorganizations due to unforeseen difficulties, delays or unexpected costs. If ChargePoint is unable to realize the expected operational efficiencies and cost savings from the Reorganizations, its operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected. In addition, ChargePoint may need to undertake additional workforce reductions or restructuring activities in the future.
ChargePoint’s future revenue growth will depend in significant part on its ability to increase sales of its products and services to fleet operators.operators, including autonomous fleets.
ChargePoint’s future revenue growth will depend in significant part on its ability to increase sales of its products and services to fleet operators. The electrification of traditional fleets is an emerging market, and fleet operators may not adopt EVs on a widespread basis and on the timelines ChargePoint anticipates. In addition to the factors affecting the growth of the EV market generally, transitioning to an EV fleet can be costly and capital intensive, which could result in slower than anticipated adoption. The sales cycle could also be longer for sales to fleet operators, as they are often larger organizations, with more formal procurement processes than smaller commercial site hosts. Fleet operators may also require significant additional services and support, and if ChargePoint is unable to provide such services and support, it may adversely affect its ability to attract additional fleet operators as customers. Any failure to attract and retain fleet operators as customers in the future would adversely affect ChargePoint’s business and results of operations.
In addition, the emerging development and deployment of autonomous vehicle fleets may present distinct challenges to ChargePoint. Autonomous fleet operators have charging requirements that differ materially from those of traditional fleet operators, including the need for high-throughput, and depot-based charging infrastructure capable of supporting continuous vehicle utilization with minimal downtime. Autonomous vehicles may also require automated or robotic charging connector solutions that ChargePoint does not currently offer, and the development of such capabilities may require significant additional research and development expenditures, with no assurance that ChargePoint will be able to develop or commercialize such solutions on a timely basis or at all. Furthermore, autonomous fleet operators may require deeper and more complex integrations between ChargePoint's software platform and their proprietary fleet management, route optimization and charge scheduling systems, which may increase ChargePoint’s development costs and lengthen sales cycles. The operators of autonomous vehicle fleets may also have significantly different procurement expectations and technical requirements than traditional fleet managers, and certain well-capitalized autonomous vehicle operators may elect to develop proprietary charging infrastructure and solutions in-house rather than procure them from third-party providers such as ChargePoint. If ChargePoint is unable to adapt its products, services and platform capabilities to address the requirements of autonomous fleet operators, or if such operators develop competing solutions internally, ChargePoint may be unable to capture a meaningful share of the autonomous fleet charging market, which could adversely affect ChargePoint's business, results of operations and financial condition.
As part of ChargePoint’s business strategy, ChargePoint has made and may in the future make acquisitions of, or investments in, businesses, services or technologies that are complementary to its existing business. The process of identifying and consummating acquisitions and investments and the subsequent integration of new assets and businesses into ChargePoint’s own business,business requires attention from management and could result in a diversion of resources from its existing business, which in turn could have an adverse effect on its operations. Acquired assets or businesses may not generate the expected financial results. Acquisitions or investments could also result in the use of cash, potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, the occurrence of goodwill impairment charges, amortization expenses for other intangible assets and exposure to potential unknown liabilities of the acquired business or investment. ChargePoint may also incur costs and management time on transactions that are ultimately not completed. In addition, ChargePoint’s due diligence may fail to identify all of the problems, liabilities or other shortcomings or challenges of an acquired business, product, technology or investment, including issues related to intellectual property, product quality or product architecture, regulatory compliance practices, revenue recognition or other accounting practices or issues with employees or customers.
ChargePoint’s acquisitions or investments may not ultimately strengthen its competitive position or achieve its goals and business strategy; ChargePoint may be subject to claims or liabilities assumed from an acquired company, product or technology; acquisitions or investments ChargePoint completes could be viewed negatively by its customers, investors and securities analysts; and ChargePoint may incur costs and expenses necessary to address an acquired company’s failure to comply with laws and governmental rules and regulations. Additionally, ChargePoint may be subject to litigation or other claims in connection with the acquired company, including claims from terminated employees, former stockholders or other third parties, which may differ from or be more significant than the risks ChargePoint’s business faces for similar litigation or other claims. An acquired company may also need to implement or improve its controls, procedures and policies, and ChargePoint may face risks associated if any of those controls, procedures or policies are insufficiently effective. ChargePoint may also face retention or cultural challenges associated with integrating employees from the acquired company into its organization. If ChargePoint is unsuccessful at integrating acquisitions or investments in a timely manner, the revenue and operating results of the combined company could be adversely affected. Any integration process may require significant time and resources, which may disrupt ChargePoint’s ongoing business and divert management’s attention, and ChargePoint may not be able to manage the integration process successfully or in a timely manner. ChargePoint may not successfully evaluate or utilize the acquired technology or personnel, realize anticipated synergies from the acquisition or investment, or accurately forecast the financial impact of an acquisition or investment transaction or the related integration of such acquisition or investment, including accounting charges and any potential impairment of goodwill and intangible assets recognized in connection with such transaction. ChargePoint may have to pay cash, incur debt, or issue equity or equity-linked securities to pay for any acquisitions or investments, each of which could adversely affect its financial condition or the market price of its Common Stock. Furthermore, the sale of equity or issuance of equity-linked debt to finance any such transaction could result in dilution to ChargePoint’s stockholders. The occurrence of any of these risks could harm ChargePoint’s business, operating results and financial condition.
ChargePoint also derives other revenuerevenue, as set forth on its condensed consolidated statements of operationsoperations, from regulatory credits.credits, such as from the Canadian Clean Fuel Regulation (“CCFR”). If government support of these credits declines, or if the requirements of such programs are modified or tightened, ChargePoint’s ability to generate this other revenue in the future would be adversely affected. InCertain yearsregulatory priorcredit programs, such as the CCFR, also impose ongoing compliance obligations, including requirements to fiscalreinvest yearcredit 2021,proceeds ChargePointinto derivedthe a slight majorityexpansion of itscharging infrastructure, which constrain ChargePoint'’ use of those funds for other business purposes and increase administrative costs associated with tracking and demonstrating compliance. Failure to satisfy such reinvestment or other program requirements could result in penalties, credit clawbacks or disqualification from future credit generation, any of which could reduce ChargePoint’s other revenue fromand regulatoryadversely credits.affect However,its revenuebusiness fromand this source as a percentageresults of other and total revenue has declined in recent quarters and it may continue to decline over time.operations. Further, the availability and value of such credits may decline regardless of the levels of general governmental support of the transition to EV infrastructure.
Changes in federal or state fuel‑economy standards and emissions regulations present material risks to the EV market and, consequently, to the demand for our products and services. For instance, the OBBAOBBBA eliminated the civil penalty for violation of the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards which reduces incentives for automakers to improve fleet fuel efficiency. Separately, the U.S. federal government has taken efforts to rescind California’s Clean Air Act waiver which may weaken state frameworks driving adoption of ZEV standards across multiple states. Reductions in fuel‑efficiency requirements, improvements in the fuel economy of internal‑combustion vehicles, or increased adoption of alternative fuels such as ethanol, biodiesel, fuel cells or compressed natural gas could diminish EV demand. In addition, the EV fueling model is different than gas or other fuel models, requiring behavior change and education of influencers, consumers and others such as regulatory bodies. Developments in alternative technologies, such as advanced diesel, ethanol, fuel cells or compressed natural gas, or improvements in the fuel economy of the internal combustion engine, may materially and adversely affect demand for EVs and EV charging stations. For example, fuel which is abundant and relatively inexpensive in the United States, such as compressed natural gas, may emerge as a preferred alternative to petroleum-based propulsion. Regulatory bodies may also adopt rules that substantially favor certain alternatives to petroleum-based propulsion over others, which may not necessarily be EVs. Any of these changes may impose additional obstacles to the purchase of EVs or the development of a more ubiquitous EV market. If any of the above influence consumers or businesses to no longer purchase EVs or purchase them at a lower rate, it would materially and adversely affect ChargePoint’s business, operating results, financial condition and prospects.
As EV technologies change, new industry standards evolve or develop or governmental regulations impose new requirements on EV charging technology, ChargePoint may need to upgrade or adapt its charging station technology and introduce new products and services in order to serve vehicles that have the latest technology, such as battery cell technology or charging connector ports, or comply with new governmental regulations, which could involve substantial costs. Even if ChargePoint is able to keep pace with changes in technology and develop new products and services, its research and development expenses could increase, its gross margins could be adversely affected in some periods and its prior products could become obsolete or non-compliant with governmental regulations or industry standards more quickly than expected. ChargePoint may also incur additional costs and expenses related to new product transitions such as adverse impacts due to supply chain failures to procure sufficient new product components, purchase price variances, or inventory obsolescence costs related to new product transitions, including as the result of any failure on the part of ChargePoint to meet its own estimates and projections. ChargePoint cannot guarantee that any new products will be released in a timely manner, or at all, or achieve market acceptance. Delays in delivering new products that meet customer requirements could damage ChargePoint’s relationships with customers and lead them to seek alternative providers. Delays in introducing products and innovations or the failure to offer innovative products or services at competitive prices may cause existing and potential customers to purchase ChargePoint’s competitors’ products or services. Finally, new or changing state or federal regulations or industry standards may result in delays related to the development of new products or modifications to existing products in order to come into compliance and any such delays may result in customer’scustomers selecting alternative providers or result in delays related to ChargePoint’s ability to install, sell or distribute its charging station technology.
ChargePoint’s future growth depends on penetrating new markets, adapting existing products to new applications and customer requirements, and introducing new products that achieve market acceptance. ChargePoint plans to incur significant research and development costs in the future as part of its efforts to design, develop, manufacture and introduce new products and enhance existing products. ChargePoint’s research and development expenses were $35.6$68.0 million during the threesix months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026, and $139.3 million, $141.3 million million, and $220.8 million during the fiscal years ended January 31, 2026, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and may grow in the future. Further, ChargePoint’s research and development program may not produce successful results, and its new products may not achieve market acceptance, create additional revenue or become profitable.
If ChargePoint does not successfully implement, maintain or expand its information technology systems as planned, or if ChargePoint experiences a significant cybersecurity or data protection incident, its operations may be disrupted; its intellectual property and personal information,information could be compromised or misappropriated; its reputation may be adversely affected; its ability to accurately and/or timely report its financial results could be impaired; and deficiencies may arise in its internal control over financial reporting, which may impact its ability to certify its financial results and as a result its business, operations and financial results may be adversely affected.
Computer malware, viruses, ransomware, hacking, phishing attacks and similar disruptions could result in security and privacy breaches and interruption in service, which could harm ChargePoint’s businessbusiness.
ChargePoint believes that the successful use of its Networked Charging Systems and its ChargePoint Platform requires a high level of support and engagement for many of its customers, particularly its fleet and commercial customers. In order to deliver appropriate customer support and engagement, ChargePoint must successfully assist its customers in deploying and continuing to use ChargePoint’s Networked Charging Systems and ChargePoint Platform tools, resolving performance issues, addressing interoperability challenges with a customers’customer’s existing information technology or fuel management platforms and responding to Networked Charging Systems component failures or replacement parts, as well as charging station performance and reliability issues that may arise from time to time.
ChargePoint performed an analysis to assess whether an “ownership change,” as defined by Section 382 of the Code, has occurred from its inception through January 31, 2026. Based on this analysis, ChargePoint has experienced “ownership changes,” limiting the utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards or research and development tax credit carryforwards under Section 382 of the Code by first multiplying the value of the ChargePoint’s stock at the time of the ownership change by the applicable long-term tax-exempt rate, and then applying additional adjustments, as required. As a result of the ownership changes, approximately $17.1 million of Federal net operating loss carryforwards, $17.5 million of California net operating loss carryforwards, and $4.7 million of federal tax credits were determined to have expired unutilized for income tax purposes. ChargePoint’s net operating losses or credits may also be impaired under state law. Accordingly, ChargePoint may not be able to utilize a material portion of the net operating losses or credits. The ability of ChargePoint to utilize its net operating losses or credits is conditioned upon ChargePoint attaining profitability and generating U.S. federal and state taxable income. ChargePoint has incurred significant net losses since inception and will continue to incur significant losses; and therefore, ChargePoint does not know whether or when the combined carryforwards may be or may become subject to limitation by Sections 382 and 383 of the Code.
ChargePoint faces increased legal, accounting, administrative, disclosure and other costs and expenses as a public company. Sarbanes-Oxley, including the requirements of Section 404, as well as rules and regulations subsequently implemented by the SEC, the Dodd-Frank Act and the rules and regulations promulgated and to be promulgated thereunder, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the securities exchanges, impose additional reporting and other obligations on public companies. Compliance with public company requirements increases costs and makemakes certain activities more time-consuming. A number of those requirements require ChargePoint to incur additional expenses associated with SEC reporting requirements. Furthermore, if any issues in complying with those requirements are identified ChargePoint may be subject to additional costs and expenses to come into compliance. ChargePoint has incurred costs and could incur additional costs to rectify new issues, and the existence of these issues could adversely affect its reputation or investor perceptions. In addition, as a public company, ChargePoint maintains director and officer liability insurance, for which it must pay substantial premiums. The additional reporting and other obligations imposed by rules and regulations applicable to public companies increase legal and financial compliance costs and the costs of related legal, accounting and administrative activities. Advocacy efforts by stockholders and third-parties may also prompt additional changes in governance and reporting requirements, which could further increase costs.
Marketing and digital advertising laws such as the EU’s “e-Privacy Directive” and the federal CAN-SPAM Act in the United States and similar state laws create further risks for ChargePoint should it not comply with those law’slaws’ requirements concerning marketing, cookies and trackers, and email promotions. The e-Privacy Directive creates a risk of enforcement actions and fines and the CAN-SPAM Act authorizes class actions with statutory damages. In the United States, there are also putative class actions being brought based upon the use of cookies and trackers through novel theories including leveraging “wiretapping” laws. ChargePoint is currently subject to a putative class action filed under CIPA and it may need to expend costs and resources defending such litigation or enforcement action and any potential damages or fines awarded as the result of such actions, which could have an adverse effect on ChargePoint’s business and reputation. In addition to government activity, privacy advocacy groups, the technology industry and other industries have established or may establish various new, additional or different self-regulatory standards that may place additional burdens on technology companies. Customers may expect that ChargePoint will meet voluntary certifications or adhere to other standards established by them or third-parties. If ChargePoint is unable to maintain these certifications or meet these standards, it could reduce demand for its solutions and adversely affect its business.
ChargePoint is subject to risks related to increasing sustainability and environmental, social and governance regulations and disclosure requirements, which may cause ChargePoint to incur significant and additional costs of compliance, and if ChargePoint’sChargePoint fails to comply with such regulations and reporting requirements its reputation and brand could be damaged, and its business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted.
ChargePoint’s Networked Charging Systems and the ChargePoint Platform operate in a regulatory environment that imposes technical and commercial metering requirements when commercial transactions are the basis for sale (e.g., price per kWh), including those embodied in National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Handbook 44 Section 3.40 for EV fueling equipment; compliance is enforced primarily at the state level and through the National Type Evaluation Program (NTEP) certifications or California Type Evaluation Program (CTEP) in California. In certain jurisdictions, these regulations are enforced through county and municipal governments. Additionally, publicly available charging stations in many states must meet payment and disclosure rules (e.g., labeling and fee disclosure requirements). Changes in how these standards are interpreted, phased in, or enforced—or how eligibility rules under government programs are tied to them—could result in additional testing, certification, software changes, retrofits, field “placed in service” procedures, incremental costs or operating expenses, temporary site shutdowns, refunds, penalties, or delayed revenue. If ChargePoint fails to comply with or meet these standards, its reputation and brand could be damaged, and its business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted.
ChargePoint may raise additional capital through the issuance of equity or debt securities in the future. In that event, the ownership of existing ChargePoint stockholders would be diluted and the value of the stockholders' equity in Common Stock could be reduced. If ChargePoint raised more equity capital from the sale of its Common Stock, institutional or other investors may negotiate terms more favorable than the current prices of ChargePoint’s Common Stock. If ChargePoint issues debt securities, the holders of the debt would have a claim to ChargePoint assets that would be prior to the rights of stockholders until the debt is repaid. Interest on these debt securities would increase costs and could negatively impact operating results. In November 2025, ChargePoint completed a private exchange of $328.6 million of aggregate capitalized principal amount of its convertible notes with a maturity date of April 1, 2028 (the “2028 Convertible Notes” and such exchange, the “Exchange Transaction”) resulting in $11.3 million of its 2028 Convertible Notes remaining outstanding. In connection with the Exchange Transaction, ChargePoint (i) issued $186.5 million in senior secured loans (the “2025 Senior Loan”) pursuant to the 2025 Credit Agreement (described below), (ii) paid $25.0 million in cash, and (iii) issued warrants to purchase up to 1,671,000 shares of ChargePoint’s Common Stock at an exercise price of $25.00 per share (the “2025 Warrants”). Pursuant to the 2025 Senior Loan, ChargePoint has the option, during the first year that the 2025 Senior Loan is outstanding, to elect to issue shares of ChargePoint Common Stock (“Interest Shares”) in an amount equal to the quotient of (i) the amount of interest in respect of such interest period otherwise payable in cash and (ii) a price per share equal to the volume-weighted average price per share of ChargePoint’s Common Stock for the thirty (30) consecutive trading days immediately preceding (but not including) the applicable interest payment date. Through AprilJuly 30,31, 2026, ChargePoint has issued 1,393,152 of1,797,986 Interest Shares pursuant to the 2025 Senior Loan. The 2025 Senior Loan and 2028 Convertible Notes may decrease ChargePoint’s business flexibility and access to capital, require a significant amount of cash to service, dilute the ownership interest of existing stockholders and otherwise depress the price of its Common Stock, and delay or hinder an otherwise beneficial takeover of the Company.
ChargePoint, ChargePoint’s subsidiary, ChargePoint, Inc. (the “Borrower”), and certain subsidiaries of ChargePoint as guarantors (the “Subsidiary Guarantors,” and together with ChargePoint and the Borrower, the “Credit Parties”) entered into a Credit and Security Agreement on November 14, 2025 with Alter Domus (US) LLC, as administrative agent and collateral agent, and the lenders party thereto, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Credit and Security Agreement, dated April,April 23, 2026, (collectively, the “2025 Credit Agreement”). The 2025 Credit Agreement provides for the 2025 Senior Loan in an initial aggregate principal amount of $186.5 million. The 2025 Senior Loan matures on January 31, 2030 and does not amortize, except as described below. In accordance with the 2025 Credit Agreement, the Borrower prepaidwas obligated to pay up to an aggregate of $30.0 million of the 2025 Senior LoansLoan in two equal installments oforiginally $15.0 million each, the first of which occurreddue on November 24, 2025,2025 and theFebruary second16, 2026 (each such date, a “Prepayment Date”), pursuant to a formulaic repayment measure based on volume-weighted average price per share of whichCommon occurredStock for the thirty consecutive trading days preceding the applicable Prepayment Date. The Company made separate payments of $14.8 million and $9.6 million on Februarythe 17,respective 2026.Prepayment Dates in connection with the repayment of the 2025 Credit Agreement with resulting gains of $0.2 million and $5.4 million, respectively, reflected in other income. The remaining 2025 Senior Loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 12.00% per annum, payable quarterly. For each of the first four quarterly interest payment dates, the Borrower may elect to pay in Interest Shares, valued based on the 30-day trailing volume-weighted average price (“VWAP”) preceding the applicable interest payment date. Issuance of Interest Shares is subject to a cap of 19.99% of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock to comply with NYSE listing requirements, unless stockholder approval is obtained.
ChargePoint’s ability to satisfy and comply with these restrictive covenants may be impacted by events beyond its control and ChargePoint may be unable to do so. The 2025 Credit Agreement and related security agreements provide that ChargePoint’s breach or failure to satisfy certain covenants may constitute an event of default. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the lenders under the 2025 Credit Agreement could elect to declare all amounts outstanding under the 2025 Credit Agreement to be immediately due and payable. In addition, the lenders, to whom the Credit Parties granted a security interest in substantially all of their respective assets, including their intellectual property, would have the right to proceed against such assets which were provided as collateral pursuant to the 2025 Credit Agreement and related security agreements. If any of the 2025 Senior Loan outstanding under the 2025 Credit Agreement waswere to be accelerated, ChargePoint may not have sufficient cash on hand or be able to generate sufficient cash to repay it, which may have an adverse effect on its business and operating results. Moreover, the 2025 Credit Agreement requires ChargePoint to dedicate a portion of its cash flow from operations to cash interest payments after the first four quarterly interest payments, thereby reducing the availability of ChargePoint’s cash to fund working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes; increasing ChargePoint’s vulnerability to adverse general economic, industry, or competitive developments or conditions; and limiting ChargePoint’s flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in its business and the industry in which it operates or in pursuing its strategic objectives.
The 2025 Credit Agreement includes broad restrictions and limitations on the additional indebtedness that ChargePoint and its subsidiaries may incur, providedprovided, however, that, in addition to certain customary exceptions to such restrictions and limitations, ChargePoint may raise additional non-recourse indebtedness through a qualified receivables financing or qualified receivables factoring facility in a principal amount not to exceed the lesser of $75 million and fifty percent (50.0%) of the sum of ChargePoint’s Working Capital Balances (as defined in the 2025 Credit Agreement). Further, in April 2022, ChargePoint originally issued the 2028 Convertible Notes. The indenture for the 2028 Convertible Notes includes a restrictive covenant that, subject to specified exceptions, limits the ability of ChargePoint and its subsidiaries to incur secured debt in excess of $750.0 million. In addition, the indenture for the 2028 Convertible Notes separately includes customary terms and covenants, including certain events of default after which the holders of the 2028 Convertible Notes may accelerate the maturity of the 2028 Convertible Notes and declare 100% of the outstanding principal of, and accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the 2028 Convertible Notes to become due and payable immediately.
ChargePoint has never paid cash dividends on its capital stock and currently intends to retain any future earnings to fund the growth of its business. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of ChargePoint’s board of directors (the “Board”) and will depend on its financial condition, operating results, capital requirements, general business conditions and other factors that the Board may deem relevant. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of Common Stock will be the sole source of gain for the foreseeable future.
In addition, the stock market in general, and the stock prices of technology companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. Broad market and industry factors likely have seriously affected and may continue to seriously affect the market price of ChargePoint’s Common Stock, regardless of actual operating performance. In addition, in the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and the market price of a particular company, such a company has often been subject to increased shareholder activism, hostile bidsbid attempts or securities class action litigation. If ChargePoint is subject to increased shareholder activism, hostile bids or additional securities class action litigation as a result of actual and potential market price volatility described above, it could result in substantial costs, divert management’s attention and resources and could have an adverse effect on ChargePoint’s operating results, financial condition and results of operations.
ChargePoint is currently, and may in the future become, the target of securities class actions or stockholder derivative claims. Securities-related class action litigation has often been brought against companies as the result of volatility experienced in the market price of their securities. This risk is especially relevant for ChargePoint as it experiences significant stock price volatility in connection with the expansion of the developing electric vehicle charging infrastructure market and introduction of new products. Volatility in ChargePoint’s stock price and other matters affecting ChargePoint’s business and operations has, and may in the future, subject ChargePoint to actual and threatened securities class actions or stockholder derivative claims. For example, on November 29, 2023, a class action lawsuit alleging violations of federal securities laws was filed against ChargePoint and certain of its former officers, and a second class action lawsuit was filed on January 22, 2024. In May 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California consolidated the class actions into one action captioned Khan v. ChargePoint Holdings, Inc., et al. The operative complaint alleges that ChargePoint and certain of its former officers made materially false and misleading statements in violation of Section 10(b) and Rule 10(b)-5(b) of the Exchange Act regarding, (1) ChargePoint’s revenue; and (2) the value of ChargePoint’s inventory. The plaintiffs also allege that ChargePoint and certain of its former officers engaged in a scheme to prematurely recognize revenue in violation of Section 10(b) and Rules 10(b)-5(a) and (c) of the Exchange Act. Derivative actions have been filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware andDelaware, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and Delaware Chancery Court against the Board and certain of its former officers, alleging that they breached their fiduciary duties to ChargePoint in connection with the same alleged events and alleged materially false and misleading statements asserted in the class action described above. In connection with the class action, ChargePoint could be forced to make significant payments to or other settlements with its stockholders and their lawyers that are outside of ChargePoint’s insurance coverage, and such payments or settlement arrangements could have a material adverse effect on ChargePoint’s business, operating results or financial condition. In addition, ChargePoint’s involvement in these matters, as well as any future litigation or other administrative proceedings could cause ChargePoint to incur substantial expenses and could significantly divert the time and attention of ChargePoint’s management. Any public announcements related to litigation or administrative proceedings initiated or threatened against ChargePoint could cause its stock price to decline. See Note 7, Commitments and Contingencies in Part I, Item 1, “Financial Statements” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, under “Legal Proceedings” for more information related to ChargePoint’s existing securities class action and stockholder derivative actions.
The 2025 Senior Loan will bear interest at a fixed rate of 12.00% per annum, payable quarterly. For each of the first four quarterly interest payment dates,dates after November 14, 20252025, the Borrower may elect to pay Interest Shares in shares of commonCommon stockStock of ChargePoint, valued based on the 30-day VWAP preceding the applicable interest payment date and the Borrower did elect to pay Interest Shares for the first twothree quarterly interest payments. Issuance of Interest Shares is subject to a cap of 19.99% of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock to comply with NYSE listing requirements, unless stockholder approval is obtained. After the first four quarterly interest payments, ChargePoint will pay cash interest on a quarterly basis on each of February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15. Interest on the 2028 Convertible Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1, and the 2028 Convertible Notes will mature on April 1, 2028, unless redeemed, repurchased or converted in accordance with their terms prior to such date. ChargePoint can elect to make any interest payment with respect to the 2028 Convertible Notes in cash, or in kind through an increase in the principal amount of the 2028 Convertible Notes (PIK Interest) (or any combination thereof). To the extent ChargePoint elects PIK Interest, the 2028 Convertible Notes bear interest at a rate of 8.50% per annum, compared to 7.00% per annum to the extent paid in cash. For the interest periods from AprilOctober 1, 2025 throughto OctoberApril 1, 2025,2026, ChargePoint elected the option of paying PIK Interest which increased the effective interest rate payable on the 2028 Convertible Notes, increased the capitalized principal amount of the 2028 Convertible Notes and may increase dilution to ChargePoint’s stockholders to the extent the 2028 Convertible Notes are converted into shares of Common Stock pursuant to their terms. See Note 6, Debt in Part I, Item 1, “Financial Statements” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, under “2028 Convertible Notes” for more information related to ChargePoint’s election of PIK Interest payments.
As of AprilJuly 30,31, 2026, warrants to purchase ChargePoint’s Common Stock were exercisable for 3,395,961 shares of Common Stock. Any shares of ChargePoint’s Common Stock issued upon exercise of warrants, including the 2025 Warrants, will result in dilution to the then existing holders of Common Stock and increase the number of shares eligible for resale in the public market. Sales of substantial numbers of such shares in the public market could adversely affect the market price of ChargePoint’s Common Stock.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
Largest changes
see in full comparisonIn February 2026, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling striking down certain tariffs previously imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”).Theultimate availability, timing, and amount of any potential refunds of such tariffs remain highly uncertain and are subject to further legal, regulatory, and administrative developments. Following the Supreme Court’s decision, theU.S. federal governmentannouncedhasitsimposed,intentionandtomayimplementinnewthe future impose, modify, suspend, or eliminate tariffs and surchargesof up to 15%on imports frommanyvarious countries under one or more statutory authorities, including but not limited to executive trade powers and applicable provisions oftheU.S.sametradecountries previously subject to IEEPA under separate authority, including Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.law. There remains substantial uncertainty regarding the duration of existing and newly announced tariffs and surcharges, potential changes or pauses to such tariffs, tariff levels, and whether further additional tariffs or other retaliatory actions may be imposed, modified, or suspended, and the impacts of such actions on ChargePoint’s business. ChargePoint continues to monitor and evaluate these developments and assess their potential impact on ChargePoint’s business, financial condition, and results of operations. Trade restrictions and increased tariffs between the United States and countries like China, Mexico and Canada may result in adverse economic conditions, increase the costs of goods sold and result in a recession or the threat of a recession.
“Collectively, these working capital and expense management initiatives are intended to optimize operating cash flow, strengthen ChargePoint’ liquidity position, and support a sustainable path toward improved financial performance. While there can be no assurance that these measures will achieve their intended objectives in any given period, management believes that its active and disciplined approach to working capital management positions ChargePoint to meet its near-term operational requirements and advance its strategic objectives. …”see in full comparison
“General and administrative expenses decreased during the six months ended July 31, 2026 compared to the six months ended July 31, 2025 primarily due to a decrease in non-recurring operating expenses of $9.5 million mainly from litigation and settlement costs and a decrease of $4.6 million in payroll-related expense resulting from reduced headcount associated with our previously announced reorganizations, including lower stock-based compensation expense, offset by $3.9 million employee severance, termination and employment-related exit costs and facilities exit costs related to the March and …”see in full comparison
“With respect to accounts receivable, ChargePoint is concentrated on shortening the cash conversion cycle, including tightening payment terms with key customers and channel partners, and deploying dedicated collection resources focused on aged and high-balance receivables. The magnitude and timing of DSO improvement may vary from period to period depending on customer mix, contract structures, and prevailing commercial conditions. With respect to expense controls, management employs cost optimization measures designed to reduce cash expenditures and improve operating leverage. …”see in full comparison
Cost of Networked Charging Systems revenue increased during the three and six months endedsee in full comparisonAprilJuly30,31, 2026 compared to the three and six months endedAprilJuly30,31, 2025 primarily due toloweracostshigher volume of productsshipped.shipped, partially offset by a one-time tariff refund during the three and six months ended July 31, 2026 of $4.3 million.
“ChargePoint continues to be focused on managing its working capital position, concentrating its efforts on accelerating the collection of accounts receivable, improving days sales outstanding ("”DSO"”) across its customer and channel relationships, maintaining a disciplined approach to managing its supply chain relationships, other activities which drive optimization of its inventory levels, and active expense controls across the organization.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (42)
Since its inception in 2007, ChargePoint has been engaged in developing and marketing its Networked Charging Systems, subscriptions and other offerings, raising capital and recruiting personnel. ChargePoint has incurred net operating losses and negative cash flows from operations in every year since its inception. As of AprilJuly 30,31, 2026, ChargePoint had an accumulated deficit of $2,154.8$2,190.5 million. The Company’s principal sources of liquidity are its cash and cash equivalents, cash generated from sales to customers, debt financing (as described in Part I, Item 1, Note 6, Debt), and sales of Common Stock under the 2022 and 2025 ATM FacilitiesFacility (as defined in Part I, Item 1, Note 8, Common Stock).
ChargePoint believes its revenue growth is tied to the number of passenger and commercial EVs sold, which it believes drives the demand for EV charging infrastructure. The market for EVs is still rapidly evolving and although demand for EVs has grown in recent years, the rate of EV sales is highly volatile and there is no guarantee of future demand for EV sales, especially in the markets ChargePoint primarily services, such as North America and Europe. Factors impacting the adoption of EVs include but are not limited to perceptions about EV features, quality, safety, performance and cost; perceptions about the limited range over which EVs may be driven on a single battery charge; volatility in the cost of oil and gasoline (including as a result of ongoing conflicts in the Middle East involving the United States, Iran, Israel and other Gulf States); availability of services for EVs; consumers’ perception about the convenience, reliability and cost of charging EVs; and increases in fuel efficiency of internal combustion engine vehicles. Further, numerous EV auto manufacturers have announced delays in or modified their previously announced plans to migrate their manufacturing production to be solely or primarily EVs. For example, the North American EV market has recently suffered a substantial declinedeclines in the sale of new EVs since the termination of the $7,500 U.S. federal tax credit in September 2025, resulting in quarterly declines of new EVs sold as compared to the same quarters in the prior year.periods. If the market for EVs does not develop as expected, if there is any slow-down or delay in overall EV adoption, or if auto manufacturers delay their EV manufacturing rates or eliminate their plans to transition to predominatelypredominantly EV manufacturing, the rate of EV adoption may be adversely affected and the market for EV charging may not develop as a result and ChargePoint’s financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely impacted.
In February 2026, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling striking down certain tariffs previously imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”). The ultimate availability, timing, and amount of any potential refunds of such tariffs remain highly uncertain and are subject to further legal, regulatory, and administrative developments. Following the Supreme Court’s decision, the U.S. federal government announcedhas itsimposed, intentionand tomay implementin newthe future impose, modify, suspend, or eliminate tariffs and surcharges of up to 15% on imports from manyvarious countries under one or more statutory authorities, including but not limited to executive trade powers and applicable provisions of theU.S. sametrade countries previously subject to IEEPA under separate authority, including Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.law. There remains substantial uncertainty regarding the duration of existing and newly announced tariffs and surcharges, potential changes or pauses to such tariffs, tariff levels, and whether further additional tariffs or other retaliatory actions may be imposed, modified, or suspended, and the impacts of such actions on ChargePoint’s business. ChargePoint continues to monitor and evaluate these developments and assess their potential impact on ChargePoint’s business, financial condition, and results of operations. Trade restrictions and increased tariffs between the United States and countries like China, Mexico and Canada may result in adverse economic conditions, increase the costs of goods sold and result in a recession or the threat of a recession.
In addition, the United States automotive manufacturemanufacturing industry is particularly sensitive to the impact of disruptions in supply chains as a result of geopolitical conflicts and tariffs on the increased costs of manufacturing and selling vehicles, which may result in substantial increases to the cost of vehicles to consumers, including EVs. Because ChargePoint is substantially reliant on the increased adoption and sales of new EVs, if there is any downturn in the sales of EVs or consumers reduce their purchases of new EVs, either because the vehicles are more expensive or as the result of a general downturn in the overall economy as the result of the conflicts in the Middle East and additional tariffs, ChargePoint’s customers may reduce their need for EV infrastructure development and ChargePoint’s business, financial results and results of operations may be harmed.
As ChargePoint introduces new productsproducts, its gross margins may be initially negatively impacted by launch costs and lower sales volumes until it achieves targeted cost reductions. Cost reductions may not occur on the timeline ChargePoint expects due to a number of factors, including but not limited to failure to meet its own estimates, unanticipated supply chain difficulties, government mandates or certification requirements. In recent quarters, ChargePoint has maintained elevated levels of inventory, and ChargePoint is also preparing for the introduction of its next generation AC and DC Networked Charging System models, which increases the complexity of inventory management and heightens the risk that certain existing products or components may become excess, obsolete, or subject to inventory write‑downs. In addition, ChargePoint may accelerate its expenditures where it sees growth opportunities, which may negatively impact gross margin until upfront costs and inefficiencies are absorbed and normalized operations are achieved. Further, ChargePoint has historically invested in prioritizing an assurance of supply of its products and new customer acquisition, which puts pressure on gross margins and increases operating expenses. ChargePoint also continuously evaluates and may adjust its expenditures, such as new product introduction costs, based on its launch plans for new products, as well as other factors including the pace and prioritization of current projects under development and the addition of new projects. As ChargePoint attains higher revenue, it expects operating expenses as a percentage of total revenue to decrease as it scales and focuses on increasing operational efficiency and process automation.
ChargePoint intends to use third-party contract manufacturers and design partners for targeted new research and development initiatives with the goals of controlling development costs and decreasing operating expenses. ChargePoint believes such partnerships will allow it to better manage research and development expenses, improve the speed and quality of new product development and increase its efficiencies by leveraging the design talent and supply chains of these partners. Implementing third-party design partners for new research and development initiatives will require sophisticated oversight, quality programs and cost-control initiatives. If ChargePoint is not successful in its use of third-party contract manufacturers and design partners for new product developmentdevelopment, its financial conditions, gross margins and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
For example, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act signed into law on November 15, 2021 provided additional funding for EVs and EV charging infrastructure through the creation of new programs and grants and the expansion of existing programs, including the $7.5 billion National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (“NEVI”) Program for EV charging along highway corridors. On August 11, 2025, the Federal Highway Administration (“FHWA”) issued new guidance, updating prior guidance which previously froze federal funds tied to NEVI and directed states to file updated implementation plansplans. within 30 days.The FHWA has since approved the state plans and states are moving forward with their NEVI programs. Separately, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”) was signed into law on July 4, 2025, which set new end dates for the EV charging infrastructure tax credits previously made available under Section 30C and Section 30D of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. In particular, the OBBBA terminated the $7,500 new clean vehicle tax credit for all new EVs sold after September 30, 2025. This and any other reduction in rebates, tax credits or other financial incentives for EVs or EV charging stations could materially reduce the demand for EVs and ChargePoint’s solutions and, as a result, may adversely impact ChargePoint’s business and expansion potential.
ChargePoint has seen its revenue fluctuate based on market demand and other factors, and expects this variability of growth in Networked Charging Systems revenue to continue in the near term. In the long term, it expects revenue to grow in both Networked Charging Systems and subscriptions due to increased demand in EVs and the related charging infrastructure market.
Networked Charging Systems revenue increased during the three and six months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 compared to the three and six months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2025 primarily due to higher volume of Networked Charging Systems delivered across ChargePoint’s major product families.
Subscriptions revenue increased during the three and six months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 compared to the three and six months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2025 primarily due to the growth in the number of ChargePoint Platform subscriptions and Assure subscriptions for Networked Charging Systems connected to ChargePoint’s network.
Other revenue increased during the three and six months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 compared to the three and six months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2025 due to an increase in transaction fees earned for processing payments collected on driver charging sessions at charging sites owned by ChargePoint’s customers.
Cost of Networked Charging Systems revenue increased during the three and six months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 compared to the three and six months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2025 primarily due to lowera costshigher volume of products shipped.shipped, partially offset by a one-time tariff refund during the three and six months ended July 31, 2026 of $4.3 million.
Cost of Subscriptions revenue increased primarily due to the increases in Assure costs during the three and six months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 compared to the three and six months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2025.
Cost of other revenue decreaseddid not materially change during the three and six months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 compared to the three and six months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2025 due to cost efficiencies associated with driver charging sessions at charging sites owned by ChargePoint’s customers.2025.
In the long term, improvements in ChargePoint’s gross profit and gross margin will depend on its ability to continue to optimize its operations and supply chain as it increases its revenue. However, at least in the short term, as the product mix continues to vary and as ChargePoint continues to align inventory supply with demand and optimize for customer acquisition, launches new Networked Charging Systems,Systems products, grows its presence in Europe where it has not yet achieved economies of scale,Europe, and expands its solutions for its fleet customers, gross margin will vary from period to period.
Gross profit and gross margin increased during the three and six months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 compared to the three and six months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2025 primarily due to Networked Charging Systems cost efficiencies, a one-time tariff refund in the period, and a slight increase in subscription revenue as a percentage of total revenue.
Research and development expenses increaseddecreased during the three months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 compared to the three months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2025 primarily due to $4.1a decrease of $6.3 million in payroll-related expense resulting from reduced headcount associated with our previously announced reorganizations, including lower stock-based compensation expense, offset by a $2.2 million increase in employee severance, termination and employment-related exit costs related to the March and July 2026 Reorganization, offset by a $3.2 million reduction in stock based compensation expense.Reorganizations.
Research and development expenses decreased during the six months ended July 31, 2026 compared to the six months ended July 31, 2025 primarily due to a decrease of $8.6 million in payroll related expense resulting from reduced headcount associated with our previously announced reorganizations, offset by a $6.3 million increase in employee severance, termination and employment-related exit costs related to the March and July 2026 Reorganizations.
Sales and marketing expenses decreased during the three months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 compared to the three months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2025 primarily due to a decrease in bad debt expense of $2.0 million, decrease of $1.2$3.3 million in stockpayroll-related basedexpense compensation,resulting from reduced headcount associated with our previously announced reorganizations, including lower stock-based compensation expense, offset by $1.7a $1.5 million increase in employee severance, termination and employment-related exit costs related to the March and July 2026 Reorganization.Reorganizations and an increase of $0.8 million in commission-related costs.
Sales and marketing expenses decreased during the six months ended July 31, 2026 compared to the six months ended July 31, 2025 primarily due to a decrease of $5.0 million in payroll-related expense resulting from reduced headcount associated with our previously announced reorganizations, including lower stock-based compensation expense, decrease in bad debt expense of $1.7 million, offset by $3.2 million of employee severance, termination and employment-related exit costs related to the March and July 2026 Reorganizations.
General and administrative expenses decreased during the three months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 compared to the three months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2025 primarily due to a decrease in non-recurring operating expenses of $3.6$5.9 million mainly from litigation and settlement costs, and a decrease of $2.6$2.3 million in stockpayroll-related basedexpense compensation,resulting from reduced headcount associated with our previously announced reorganizations, including lower stock-based compensation expense, offset by $1.8$2.1 million of employee severance, termination and employment-related exit costs and facilities exit costs related to Marchthe July 2026 Reorganization..Reorganization.
General and administrative expenses decreased during the six months ended July 31, 2026 compared to the six months ended July 31, 2025 primarily due to a decrease in non-recurring operating expenses of $9.5 million mainly from litigation and settlement costs and a decrease of $4.6 million in payroll-related expense resulting from reduced headcount associated with our previously announced reorganizations, including lower stock-based compensation expense, offset by $3.9 million employee severance, termination and employment-related exit costs and facilities exit costs related to the March and July 2026 Reorganizations.
Interest income decreased during the three and six months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 as compared to the three and six months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2025 due to lower balances of interest-bearing cash equivalents.
Interest expense decreased during the three and six months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 as compared to the three and six months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2025 primarily due to a decrease in the outstanding balance of the 2028 Convertible Notes as the result of the debt Exchange Transaction. For more information, see Part I, Item 1, Note 6, Debt, in the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report.
Other expense did not materially change during the three months ended July 31, 2026 as compared to the three months ended July 31, 2025.
Other income, net increased during the threesix months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 as compared to the threesix months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2025 primarily due to the recognition of a $5.4 million gain on prepayment of Short-Term Loans,Loans (as described in Part I, Item 1, Note 6, Debt), offset by a decrease in foreign exchange gains of $3.0$3.6 million driven by unfavorable changes in foreign exchange rates.
The provision for income taxes increased during the three and six months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 as compared to the three and six months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2025 primarily due to income tax provisions on foreign subsidiaries.
ChargePoint’s primary requirements for liquidity and capital are to finance working capital, inventory management, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes. ChargePoint expects these needs to continue as ChargePoint develops and grows its business. ChargePoint has incurred net losses and negative cash flows from operations since its inception, which it anticipates will continue for the foreseeable future.inception.
ChargePoint continues to be focused on managing its working capital position, concentrating its efforts on accelerating the collection of accounts receivable, improving days sales outstanding ("”DSO"”) across its customer and channel relationships, maintaining a disciplined approach to managing its supply chain relationships, other activities which drive optimization of its inventory levels, and active expense controls across the organization.
With respect to accounts receivable, ChargePoint is concentrated on shortening the cash conversion cycle, including tightening payment terms with key customers and channel partners, and deploying dedicated collection resources focused on aged and high-balance receivables. The magnitude and timing of DSO improvement may vary from period to period depending on customer mix, contract structures, and prevailing commercial conditions. With respect to expense controls, management employs cost optimization measures designed to reduce cash expenditures and improve operating leverage. These measures may include active supply chain and order management, review, prioritization and timing of vendor payments, rationalization of vendor relationships and organizational efficiency initiatives intended to align ChargePoint'’ cost structure with current and anticipated revenue levels. Management continues to evaluate additional opportunities to reduce costs and improve operating efficiency on an ongoing basis.
Collectively, these working capital and expense management initiatives are intended to optimize operating cash flow, strengthen ChargePoint’ liquidity position, and support a sustainable path toward improved financial performance. While there can be no assurance that these measures will achieve their intended objectives in any given period, management believes that its active and disciplined approach to working capital management positions ChargePoint to meet its near-term operational requirements and advance its strategic objectives. ChargePoint may, from time to time, revise or adapt these practices as business conditions and commercial relationships evolve.
As of AprilJuly 30,31, 2026, ChargePoint had cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash of $96.2$95.7 million. As of January 31, 2026, ChargePoint had cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash of $142.0 million. ChargePoint believes that its cash on hand and cash generated from sales to customers will satisfy its working capital and capital requirements for at least the next twelve months.
On July 1, 2022, ChargePoint filed a registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-265986) with the SEC (that was declared effective by the SEC on July 12, 2022), which permitted ChargePoint to offer up to $1.0 billion of shares of Common Stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants and rights in one or more offerings and in any combination, including in units from time to time (the “2022 Shelf Registration Statement”). As part of the 2022 Shelf Registration Statement, ChargePoint filed a prospectus supplement registering for sale from time to time up to $500.0 million of shares of Common Stock pursuant to a sales agreement (the “2022 ATM Facility”). During the twelve months ended January 31, 2026, there were no sales of the Company’s Common Stock pursuant to the 2022 ATM Facility. On July 11, 2025, ChargePoint terminated the 2022 ATM Facility, effective immediately. The 2022 Shelf Registration Statement expired on July 12, 2025.
On September 8, 2025, ChargePoint filed a registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-290113) with the SEC (which was amended on December 5, 2025 and was declared effective by the SEC on December 8, 2025), which permits ChargePoint to offer up to $400.0 million of shares of Common Stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants and rights in one or more offerings and in any combination, including in units from time to time (the “2025 Shelf Registration Statement”). The 2025 Shelf Registration Statement includes a sales agreement prospectus pursuant to which ChargePoint may, from time to time, offer and sell up to $150.0 million of shares of Common Stock pursuant to a new “at-the-market” sales agreement (the “2025 ATM Facility”). During the three months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026, there were no sales of the Company’s Common Stock pursuant to the 2025 ATM Facility.
ChargePoint has incurred net losses and negative cash flows from operations since inception. Until ChargePoint can generate sufficient revenue to cover its cost of sales, operating expenses, working capital and capital expenditures, it expects to primarily fund cash needs through a combination of working capital management, equity and debt financing. ChargePoint may borrow funds on terms that may include restrictive covenants, such as the restrictive covenants included in the 2025 Credit Agreement, including covenants that restrict the operation of its business, liens on assets, high effective interest rates and repayment provisions that reduce cash resources and limit future access to capital markets.
For the ThreeSix Months Ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 and 2025
During the threesix months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026, net cash used in operating activities was $36.6$40.8 million, consisting primarily of a net loss of $43.2$78.8 million and change in net operating assets of $3.1$8.9 million, partially offset by an add back of total non-cash charges of $9.7$29.2 million. The noncash charges consisted of $10.6$21.6 million of stock-based compensation expense, $7.1$14.0 million of depreciation, amortization, and amortization of deferred contract acquisition costs, $0.8$1.7 million of non-cash operating lease cost, $0.4 million of non-cash interest expensesexpenses, offset by $9.2 million of reserves and $0.3other costs and $0.8 million of foreign currency transaction loss, offset by $9.5 million of reserves and other costs.loss. The change in operating assets and liabilities was mainly driven by a decrease in inventories of $40.7 million, offset by a decrease in accounts payable, operating lease liabilities, and accrued and other liabilities of $20.3$22.3 million, increases in prepaid expenses and other assets of $2.5$6.8 millionmillion, anda decrease in deferred revenue of $1.5$1.0 million, offset by a decrease in inventories of $15.7 million and aan decreaseincrease in accounts receivable, net, of $5.5$1.8 million.
During the threesix months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2025, net cash used in operating activities was $33.0$39.1 million, consisting primarily of a net loss of $57.1$123.3 million andmillion, change in net operating assets of $9.9$21.0 million,million partiallyand offset by an add back oftotal non-cash charges of $34.1$63.2 million. The noncash charges consisted primarily of $17.9$36.1 million of stock-based compensation expense, $1.6 million of reserves and other costs, $7.8$15.5 million of depreciation, amortization, and amortization of deferred contract acquisition costs, $9.4 million non-cash interest expenses, $4.3 million of reserves and $0.9other costs, and $1.8 million of non-cash operating lease cost, offset by $3.5$3.9 million of foreign currency transaction gains. The change in operating assets and liabilities was mainly driven by aan decreaseincrease in accounts payable, operating lease liabilities, and accrued and other liabilities of $6.4$3.3 million, and an increase in deferred revenue of $8.4 million, and decreases in prepaid expenses and other assets of $10.7$3.4 million, offset by a decrease in inventories of $2.8$3.3 millionmillion, and anaccounts increasereceivable, in deferred revenuenet, of $4.4$2.6 million.
During the threesix months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026, net cash used in investing activities was $1.1$2.1 million related to purchases of property and equipment.
During the threesix months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2025, net cash used in investing activities was $1.1$2.4 million related to purchases of property and equipment.
During the threesix months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026, net cash used in financing activities was $7.6$2.5 million, consisting of repayment of borrowings of $9.6 million, offset by change in driver funds and amounts due to customers of $1.6$6.8 million and proceeds from the issuance of Common Stock under employee equity plans of $0.4 million, net of tax withholding.
During the threesix months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2025, net cash provided by financing activities was $2.4$8.1 million, consisting of proceeds from the issuance of Common Stock under employee equity plans of $1.3 million, net of tax withholding, and change in driver funds and amounts due to customers of $1.1$6.8 million.
CHPT insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 1 Form 4 filing (1 insider, 1 trade date, 46,847 shares, about $250.2K) and open-market sales in 9 filings (5 insiders, 2 trade dates, 45,846 shares, about $372.6K). Net open-market shares: 1,001 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$122.4K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-22 | Novruzova Natella Fakhradovna |
Open-market sale | 1,484 | $9.86 | $14.6K |
| 2026-09-22 | Singh Jagdeep Ca |
Open-market sale | 5,965 | $9.86 | $58.8K |
| 2026-09-22 | Khetani Mansi |
Open-market sale | 4,931 | $9.86 | $48.6K |
| 2026-09-22 | Batill Eric |
Open-market sale | 4,302 | $9.86 | $42.4K |
| 2026-09-20 | Wilmer Richard |
Shares withheld for tax | 7,631 | $10.32 | $78.8K |
| 2026-07-21 | Singh-Bushell Ekta |
Grant/award | 18,370 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Singh-Bushell Ekta |
Grant/award | 6,680 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Heystee Susan |
Grant/award | 18,370 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Heystee Susan |
Grant/award | 6,680 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Linse Michael |
Grant/award | 18,370 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Linse Michael |
Grant/award | 6,680 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Linse Michael |
Grant/award | 2,505 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Leschly Mark |
Grant/award | 6,680 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Leschly Mark |
Grant/award | 1,336 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Leschly Mark |
Grant/award | 18,370 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Harris Jeffrey |
Grant/award | 18,370 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Harris Jeffrey |
Grant/award | 6,680 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Harris Jeffrey |
Grant/award | 3,340 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Harries Axel |
Grant/award | 6,680 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Harries Axel |
Grant/award | 18,370 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Bowman Roxanne |
Grant/award | 18,370 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Bowman Roxanne |
Grant/award | 6,680 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Wagoner G Richard Jr |
Grant/award | 6,680 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Wagoner G Richard Jr |
Grant/award | 18,370 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Chizen Bruce R |
Grant/award | 6,680 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Chizen Bruce R |
Grant/award | 5,010 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Chizen Bruce R |
Grant/award | 18,370 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Dhruv Mitesh |
Grant/award | 6,680 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Dhruv Mitesh |
Grant/award | 18,370 | — | — |
| 2026-06-23 | Vice John David |
Open-market sale | 4,072 | $7.13 | $29.0K |
| 2026-06-23 | Singh Jagdeep Ca |
Open-market sale | 9,719 | $7.14 | $69.4K |
| 2026-06-23 | Novruzova Natella Fakhradovna |
Open-market sale | 2,242 | $7.13 | $16.0K |
| 2026-06-23 | Khetani Mansi |
Open-market sale | 8,152 | $7.14 | $58.2K |
| 2026-06-23 | Batill Eric |
Open-market sale | 4,979 | $7.13 | $35.5K |
| 2026-06-20 | Wilmer Richard |
Shares withheld for tax | 7,631 | $8.31 | $63.4K |
| 2026-06-01 | Batill Eric |
Grant/award | 70,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-01 | Khetani Mansi |
Grant/award | 59,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-01 | Vice John David |
Grant/award | 54,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-01 | Novruzova Natella Fakhradovna |
Grant/award | 20,000 | — | — |
| 2026-06-01 | Singh Jagdeep Ca |
Grant/award | 75,000 | — | — |
| 2026-04-13 | Wilmer Richard |
Open-market purchase | 46,847 | $5.34 | $250.2K |
Well-known investors holding CHPT (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 181,159 | $1.1M | 0.0% | Added 26% |
| Coatue Management (Philippe Laffont) | 2026-06-30 | 154,086 | $910.6K | 0.0% | No change |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 119,455 | $706.0K | 0.0% | New position |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 40,725 | $197.9K | — | Sold out |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 17,002 | $100.5K | 0.0% | Reduced 88% |
| D. E. Shaw & Co. | 2026-06-30 | 16,234 | $95.9K | 0.0% | New position |