Companies › CHRW

CHRW 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. · Nasdaq · Arrangement Of Transportation Of Freight & Cargo · CIK 1043277 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

2 / 2risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
0new risk-factor headings
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-02-13 (period ending 2025-12-31) with 10-K filed 2025-02-14 (period ending 2024-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

2new paragraphs
2removed paragraphs
21reworded paragraphs
5,220 → 5,501words in section

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: tariff, supply chain
“•changes in tariffs, trade restrictions, trade agreements, and taxations. In 2025, the United States government made significant changes to our national trade policy, including imposing tariffs on certain goods imported into the United States. The tariffs impacted our Global Forwarding business in 2025, most significantly in the second quarter of 2025, with volatile market conditions causing global demand fluctuations and lower volumes. Changes in United States trade policy, including tariffs on certain imported goods, could continue to increase our costs and disrupt global supply chains. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: sanction, regulation

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

•issues related to non-compliance with laws, rules, and regulations in the countries in which we operate includingincluding, among others, those promulgated by the U.S.United States Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) related to sanctions and embargoes and the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act related to bribery and similar regulations.corruption. Failure to comply could result in reputational harm, substantial penalties, and operational restrictions; and
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: regulation, climate

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Our contracted transportation providers are subject to an increasingly stringentcomplex lawsclimate-related protectingregulatory the environment,landscape, including transitional risks relating to climate change, which could directly or indirectly have a material adverse effect on our business. Future and existing environmental regulatory requirements, including evolving transportation technology,requirements in the United States and abroad could adversely affect operations and increase operating expenses, which in turn could increase our purchased transportation costs. We may also incur expenses as a result of regulators requiring additional climate-related disclosures regarding our contracted transportation providers that may be labor-intensive to report on. UntilGiven the timing,continuously scope,developing and extentnature of suchthese possibleregulatory regulation becomes finalized,frameworks, we cannot predict its effect on our company, but if we are unable to pass such costs along to our customers, our business could be materially and adversely affected. Even without any new legislation or regulation, increased public concern regarding greenhouse gas emissions by transportation carriers could harm the reputations of companies operating in the transportation and logistics industries and shift consumer demand toward more locally-sourced products and away from our services.
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: artificial intelligence, ai

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

We use, and may continue to expand our use of, machine learning and artificial intelligence (“AI”) technologies to deliver our services and operate our business. We leverage machine learning and AI technologies to enhance operational efficiency, automate processes, and improve the customer experience across our logistics platform. If we fail to successfully integrate AI into our platform and business processes, or if we fail to keep pace with rapidly evolving AI technological developments, including attracting and retaining talented AI developersdevelopers, and programmersprogrammers, and cybersecurity personnel, we may face a competitive disadvantage. At the same time, the use or offering of AI technologies may result in new or expanded risks and liabilities, including enhanced government or regulatory scrutiny, litigation, privacy and compliance issues, ethical concerns, confidentiality, reputational harm, and security risks. It is not possible to predict all of the risks related to the use of AIAI, and changes in laws, rules, directives, and regulations governing the use of AI may adversely affect our ability to develop and use AI or subject us to additional legal liability. The cost of complying with laws and regulations governing AI could be significant and would increase our operating expenses, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Further, market demand and acceptance of AI technologies are uncertain, and we may be unsuccessful in efforts to further incorporate AI into our processes.
see in full comparison
New text topics: ai
“The industry is undergoing rapid technological change, including the emergence of disruptive technologies and accelerated adoption of automation and AI. Competitors are leveraging advanced digital platforms, AI-driven freight matching, and automation to improve efficiency and reduce costs. If we fail to maintain the pace, scale, or quality of automation and AI adoption, we may be unable to achieve our strategic goals for operational efficiency and digital transformation. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: competition

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

We face substantial industry competition.competition, Competitionincluding impacts from technological disruption and automation adoption. We operate in thean intensely competitive transportation services industry is intense and broad-based.logistics Weindustry, competefacing againstboth traditional and non-traditional logistics companies,competitors, including transportationasset-based providers that own equipment,carriers, third-party freight brokers, technologytechnology-driven matching services,platforms, internet freight brokers, carriers offering logistics services, and on-demand transportation service providers. WeCustomers may also competechoose against carriers’ internal sales forces. In addition, customers canto bring in-house some of thecertain services in-house, and we provide to them. We often buy and sell transportation services from and to many of our competitors. Increased competition could reduce our market opportunity andopportunities, create downward pressure on freight rates, and continued rate pressure may adversely affect our adjusted gross profits and income from operations. In some instances where we have entered into contract freight rates with customers, changes in the event market conditions changecould andrequire those contracted rates are below market rates, we may be requiredus to provide transportation services at a loss.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (25)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 1 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Economic recessionsrecession could have a significant, adverse impact on our business. The transportation industry historically has experienced cyclical fluctuations in financial results due to economic recessions, downturns in business cycles of our customers, interest rate fluctuations, currency fluctuations, and other economic factors beyond our control. Deterioration in the economic environment subjects our business to various risks, which may have a material and adverse impact on our operating results and cause us to not reach our long-term growth goals:

Reworded

•Decrease in volumes: A reduction in overall freight volumes in the marketplace may reduce our opportunities for growth. A significant portion of our freight is comprised of transactional or spot market opportunities. The market may be impacted by supply chain disruptions ordisruptions, overall economic conditions.conditions, or changes in trade policies such as tariffs. In addition, if a downturn in our customers’ business cycles causes a reduction in the volumes of freight shipped by those customers, particularly in the retail, food, beverage, automotive, industrial, manufacturing, housing, chemicals, or technology industries, our operating results could be adversely affected.

Reworded

Higher carrier prices may result in decreased adjusted gross profit margin and increases in working capital. Carriers can be expected to charge higher prices if market conditions warrant or to cover higher operating expenses. Our adjusted gross profits and income from operations may decrease if we are unable to increase our pricing to our customers. Increased demand for over the road transportation services and changes in regulations may reduce available capacity and increase motor carrier pricing. In some instances where we have entered into contract freight rates with customers, in the event market conditions change and those contracted rates are below market rates, we may be required to provide transportation services at a loss. As our volumes increase or we increase freight rates charged to our customers, the resulting increase in revenues may increase our working capital needs due to our business model, which generally has a higher length of days sales outstanding than days payables outstanding. Adjusted gross profit margin is a non-GAAP financial measure calculated as adjusted gross profits divided by total revenues. For additional information, see Item 7 of Part II, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Reworded

Changing fuel costs and interruptions of fuel supplies may have an impact on our adjusted gross profit margin. In our truckload transportation business, fluctuating fuel prices may result in a decreased adjusted gross profit margin. While our different pricing arrangements with customers and contracted motor carriers make it very difficult to measure the precise impact, we believe fuel costs essentially act as a pass-through cost to our truckload business. In times of fluctuating fuel prices, our adjusted gross profit margin may also fluctuate. Adjusted gross profit margin is a non-GAAP financial measure calculated as adjusted gross profits divided by total revenues. For additional information, see Item 7 of Part II, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Reworded

We face substantial industry competition.competition, Competitionincluding impacts from technological disruption and automation adoption. We operate in thean intensely competitive transportation services industry is intense and broad-based.logistics Weindustry, competefacing againstboth traditional and non-traditional logistics companies,competitors, including transportationasset-based providers that own equipment,carriers, third-party freight brokers, technologytechnology-driven matching services,platforms, internet freight brokers, carriers offering logistics services, and on-demand transportation service providers. WeCustomers may also competechoose against carriers’ internal sales forces. In addition, customers canto bring in-house some of thecertain services in-house, and we provide to them. We often buy and sell transportation services from and to many of our competitors. Increased competition could reduce our market opportunity andopportunities, create downward pressure on freight rates, and continued rate pressure may adversely affect our adjusted gross profits and income from operations. In some instances where we have entered into contract freight rates with customers, changes in the event market conditions changecould andrequire those contracted rates are below market rates, we may be requiredus to provide transportation services at a loss.

Added

The industry is undergoing rapid technological change, including the emergence of disruptive technologies and accelerated adoption of automation and AI. Competitors are leveraging advanced digital platforms, AI-driven freight matching, and automation to improve efficiency and reduce costs. If we fail to maintain the pace, scale, or quality of automation and AI adoption, we may be unable to achieve our strategic goals for operational efficiency and digital transformation. Inability to keep up with these advancements could increase our cost to serve customers, reduce productivity and negatively impact our ability to compete. Delays in implementing new systems or integrating emerging technologies into our workflows may also lead to higher operating expenses and missed opportunities for growth. If we cannot effectively respond to competitive pressures and technological disruption, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Added

•changes in tariffs, trade restrictions, trade agreements, and taxations. In 2025, the United States government made significant changes to our national trade policy, including imposing tariffs on certain goods imported into the United States. The tariffs impacted our Global Forwarding business in 2025, most significantly in the second quarter of 2025, with volatile market conditions causing global demand fluctuations and lower volumes. Changes in United States trade policy, including tariffs on certain imported goods, could continue to increase our costs and disrupt global supply chains. These actions, and any retaliatory measures by other countries, may lead to higher transportation costs and reduced demand, resulting in potential loss of freight volume. Additionally, heightened customs requirements could delay shipments and require significant internal resources, increasing operating expenses and negatively impacting our ability to serve customers efficiently. If we cannot mitigate these challenges, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially affected;

Removed

•changes in tariffs, trade restrictions, trade agreements, and taxations;

Reworded

•issues related to non-compliance with laws, rules, and regulations in the countries in which we operate includingincluding, among others, those promulgated by the U.S.United States Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) related to sanctions and embargoes and the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act related to bribery and similar regulations.corruption. Failure to comply could result in reputational harm, substantial penalties, and operational restrictions; and

Reworded

•global laws and regulations regarding the collection, use, processing, and transfer of personal information may impact our services by imposing restrictions on processing, increaseincreasing legal claim liability, and increaseincreasing regulatory scrutiny and fines. These requirements continue to evolve and vary by region and regime, which increases the risk of noncompliance and impacts operations, including additional expenses and resources necessary to manage compliant operations.

Reworded

Our ability to appropriately staff and retain employees is important to our business model. Our continued success depends upon our ability to attract and retain motivated logistics professionals. In order to maintain high variability in our business model, it is necessary to adjust staffing levels to changing market demands. In periods of rapid change, it may be more difficult to match our staffing level to our business needs. We cannot guarantee we will be able to continue to hire and retain a sufficient number of qualified personnel. In addition, macroeconomic factors impacting the labor market may result in higher costs to hire and retain qualified personnel. Because of our comprehensive employee training program, our employees are attractive targets for new and existing competitors. ContinuedOur continued success depends in large partsignificantly on our ability to develop successfultalented employees intoand managers.prepare them for leadership roles.

Reworded

We use, and may continue to expand our use of, machine learning and artificial intelligence (“AI”) technologies to deliver our services and operate our business. We leverage machine learning and AI technologies to enhance operational efficiency, automate processes, and improve the customer experience across our logistics platform. If we fail to successfully integrate AI into our platform and business processes, or if we fail to keep pace with rapidly evolving AI technological developments, including attracting and retaining talented AI developersdevelopers, and programmersprogrammers, and cybersecurity personnel, we may face a competitive disadvantage. At the same time, the use or offering of AI technologies may result in new or expanded risks and liabilities, including enhanced government or regulatory scrutiny, litigation, privacy and compliance issues, ethical concerns, confidentiality, reputational harm, and security risks. It is not possible to predict all of the risks related to the use of AIAI, and changes in laws, rules, directives, and regulations governing the use of AI may adversely affect our ability to develop and use AI or subject us to additional legal liability. The cost of complying with laws and regulations governing AI could be significant and would increase our operating expenses, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Further, market demand and acceptance of AI technologies are uncertain, and we may be unsuccessful in efforts to further incorporate AI into our processes.

Reworded

Divestiture activity poses risks, and success depends upon efficiently managing the transition process. Failure to do so includes potential risksrisks, including disruption to our core operations, failure to deliver the anticipated value for shareholders, diverting management’s attention from other strategic initiatives, negative impacts on our customer and contract carrier relationships, and the loss of key employees. The inability to successfully manage these risks may result in higher operating expenses, lost revenues, or other negative effects on earnings and our financial results.

Reworded

Changes to income tax regulations in the United States and other jurisdictions where we operate may increase our tax liability. We are subject to income taxes in the United States and other jurisdictions where we operate. Changes to income tax laws and regulations in any of the jurisdictions where we operate could adversely affect our overall tax liability. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (“OECD”) reached agreement among various countries to implement a minimum 15 percent tax rate on certain multinational enterprises, commonly referred to as Pillar Two. Subsequently, multiple sets of administrative guidance have been issued. Many non-U.S. tax jurisdictions have either enacted legislation to adopt certain components of the Pillar Two Model Rules beginning in 2024, including the European Union Member States, with the adoption of additional components in later years, or announced their plans to enact legislation in future years. We are subject to these rules in certain jurisdictions in which we operate, and any expected tax impacts have been included in our results. As rules for more jurisdictions will become effective in 2025, we are continuing to evaluate the impact of these proposed and enacted legislative changes as new guidance becomes available. Some of these legislative changes could impact our effective tax rate and tax liabilities. Given the numerous proposed tax law changes and the uncertainty regarding such proposed legislative changes, the impact of Pillar Two could adversely impact our effective tax rate, financial position, and results of operations.

Reworded

We are subject to claims arising from our transportation operations. We use the services of thousands of third-party transportation companies in connection with our transportation operations. From time to time, the drivers employed and engaged by the motor carriers with which we contract are involved in accidents, which may result in serious personal injuries. The resulting types and/or amounts of damages may be excluded by or exceed the amount of insurance coverage maintained by the contracted motor carrier. We contractually require all motor carriers we work with to carry at least $750,000 in automobile liability insurance. We also require all contracted motor carriers to maintain workersworkers’ compensation and other insurance coverage as required by law. Most contracted motor carriers have insurance exceeding these minimum requirements, as well as cargo insurance in varying policy amounts. Railroads, which are generally self-insured, provide limited common carrier cargo loss or damage liability protection, which generally upranges from $100,000 to $250,000 per shipment. Although these drivers are not our employees and all of these drivers are employees, owner-operators, or independent contractors working for the contracted motor carriers, from time to time, claims may be asserted against us for their actions or for our actions in retaining them. Claims against us may exceed the amount of our insurance coverage or may not be covered by insurance at all. A material increase in the frequency or severity of accidents, liability claims, workers’ compensation claims, or unfavorable resolutions of claims could materially and adversely affect our operating results. In addition, significant increases in insurance costs or the inability to purchase insurance as a result of these claims could reduce our profitability. Our involvement in the transportation of certain goods, including but not limited to, hazardous materials, could also increase our exposure in the event one of our contracted motor carriers is involved in an accident resulting in injuries or contamination.

Reworded

In North America, as a property freight broker, we are not legally liable for loss or damage to our customers’ cargo. In our customer contracts, we may agree to assume cargo liability up to a stated maximum. We typically do not assume cargo liability to our customers above minimum industry standards in our international freight forwarding, ocean transportation, or air freight businesses on international or domestic air shipments. Although we are not legally liable for loss or damage to our customers’ cargo, from time to time, claims may be asserted against us for cargo losses. We maintain a broad cargo liability insurance policy to help protect us against catastrophic losses that may not be recovered from the responsible contracted carrier. We also carry various liability insurance policies, including automobile and general liability, with atotal $125automobile limits of $135 million umbrella with upsubject to a $10 million retention,per anincident additionaldeductible, $10and total general liability limits of $87 million corridorsubject retention, andto a $6.5$500,000 millionper retentionincident in various layers throughout the umbrella.deductible.

Reworded

Buying and reselling fresh produce exposes us to possible product liability. Agricultural chemicals used on fresh produce are subject to various approvals, and the commodities themselves are subject to regulations on cleanliness and contamination. Product recalls in the produce industry have been caused by concern about particular chemicals and alleged contamination, often leading to lawsuits brought by consumers of allegedly affected produce. We may face claims for a variety of damages arising from the sale of produce, which may include potentially uninsured consequential damages. While we are insured for up to $125$87 million for product liability claims subject to a $500,000 per incident deductible, settlement of class action claims is often costly, and we cannot guarantee our coverage will be adequate or that it will continue to be available. If we have to recall produce, we may be required to bear the cost of repurchasing, transporting, and destroying any allegedly contaminated product, as well as associated consequential damages. We carry product recall and contamination insurance coverage of $30 million. A loss for which we are not adequately insured could materially affect our financial results. The coverage we currently have in place may not apply to a particular loss, or it may not be sufficient to cover all liabilities to which we may be subject. This policy has a retention of $3.5 million per incident. Any recall or allegation of contamination could affect our reputation, particularly of our proprietary and/or licensed branded produce programs, which could materially and adversely affect our operating results. Loss due to spoilage (including the need for disposal) is also a routine part of the sourcing business.

Reworded

We source fresh produce under a license issued by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) as required by PACA.Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (“PACA”). We are also subject to various regulations and requirements promulgated by other international, domestic, state, and local agencies and port authorities. Our failure to comply with the laws and regulations applicable to entities holding these licenses could materially and adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.

Reworded

Legislative or regulatory changes can affect the economics of the transportation industry by requiring changes in operating practices or influencing the demand for, and the cost of providing, transportation services. As part of our logistics services, we operate owned or leased warehouse facilities. Our operations at these facilities include both warehousing and distribution services, and we are subject to various federal, state, and international environmental,environmental; work safety,safety; and hazardous materials regulations. We may experience an increase in operating costs, such as security costs, as a result of governmental regulations that have been or will be adopted in response to terrorist activities and potential terrorist activities. No assurances can be given that we will be able to pass these increased costs on to our customers in the form of rate increases or surcharges, and our operations and profitability may be materially and adversely affected as a result.

Reworded

United States Department of Homeland Security regulations applicable to our customers that import goods into the United States and our contracted ocean carriers can impact our ability to provide and/or receive services with and from these parties. Enforcement measures related to violations of these regulations can slow and/or prevent the delivery of shipments, which may negatively impact our operations.

Removed

Enforcement measures related to violations of these regulations can slow and/or prevent the delivery of shipments, which may negatively impact our operations.

Reworded

Our contracted transportation providers are subject to an increasingly stringentcomplex lawsclimate-related protectingregulatory the environment,landscape, including transitional risks relating to climate change, which could directly or indirectly have a material adverse effect on our business. Future and existing environmental regulatory requirements, including evolving transportation technology,requirements in the United States and abroad could adversely affect operations and increase operating expenses, which in turn could increase our purchased transportation costs. We may also incur expenses as a result of regulators requiring additional climate-related disclosures regarding our contracted transportation providers that may be labor-intensive to report on. UntilGiven the timing,continuously scope,developing and extentnature of suchthese possibleregulatory regulation becomes finalized,frameworks, we cannot predict its effect on our company, but if we are unable to pass such costs along to our customers, our business could be materially and adversely affected. Even without any new legislation or regulation, increased public concern regarding greenhouse gas emissions by transportation carriers could harm the reputations of companies operating in the transportation and logistics industries and shift consumer demand toward more locally-sourced products and away from our services.

Reworded

We may be subject to negative impacts of changes in political and governmental conditions. Our operations may be subjectimpacted toby the influences of significant political, governmental, and similar changes and our ability to respond to them, including:

Reworded

•wars, civil unrest, acts of terrorism, and other conflictsglobal conflicts, such as the current conflict in the Red Sea, which is impacting the global freight market.

Reworded

We may be subject to negative impacts of catastrophic events. A disruption or failure of our systems or operations in the event of a major earthquake, weather event, cyber attack,cyber-attack, heightened security measures, actual or threatened terrorist attack, strike, civil unrest, pandemic, or other catastrophic event could cause delays in providing services or performing other critical functions. We are particularly vulnerable to these risks given the broad and global scope of our operations. A catastrophic event that results in the destruction or disruption of any of our critical business or information systems could harm our ability to conduct normal business operations and adversely impact our operating results.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

16new paragraphs
17removed paragraphs
28reworded paragraphs
6,233 → 5,921words in section

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: impairment, restructuring
“Restructuring, lease impairment charge, and divestiture expenses. Personnel expenses in 2025 included $4.8 million of severance and related personnel expenses associated with our 2025 Restructuring Program and the divestiture of our Europe Surface Transportation business. We also incurred $7.2 million in other SG&A expenses in 2025, primarily from a $6.3 million impairment charge on our Kansas City regional center lease resulting from the execution of a sublease agreement on a portion of the building. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: impairment, restructuring

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

In addition to the above, personnel expenses for 2025 included $15.0 million of severance and related personnel expenses. We also incurred $1.2 million in other SG&A expenses in 2025. These expenses were both associated with our 2025 Restructuring Program. Personnel expenses for 2024 included $6.9 million of severance and related personnel expenses. We also incurred $4.7 million in other SG&A expenses in 2024. These expenses were both associated with our 2024 Restructuring Program. Personnel expenses for 2023 included $3.8 million of severance and related personnel expenses. Other SG&A in 2023 included $18.2 million primarily related to disposal and exit activities, including asset impairments. These expenses were associated with our 2022 Restructuring Program and the divestiture of our Argentina operations. Refer to Note 14, Restructuring, for further discussion related to our 20242025 and 20222024 Restructuring Programs. Refer to Note 15, Divestitures, for further discussion related to the divestiture of our Argentina operations.
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: impairment, restructuring

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

In addition to the above, our personnel expenses for 20242025 included $24.1$30.0 million of severance and related personnel expenses related to our 20242025 Restructuring Program. In addition, other SG&A expenses for 2025 included $2.5 million of expenses associated with our 2025 Restructuring Program and the divestiture of our Europe Surface Transportation business. We also incurred $66.2$8.8 million in other SG&A expenses in 2024. These expenses were2025, primarily due tofrom a $44.5$6.3 million lossimpairment relatedcharge toon our Kansas City regional center lease resulting from the divestitureexecution of oura Europesublease Surfaceagreement Transportationon businessa andportion $21.9of millionthe related to our 2024 Restructuring Program.building.
see in full comparison
New text topics: restructuring, workforce reduction
“Operating expenses. Personnel expenses decreased primarily due to cost optimization efforts and productivity improvements and lower incentive compensation, partially offset by higher restructuring charges in the current year related to workforce reductions. Other SG&A expenses decreased with reductions across several expense categories; most notably lower claims expense.”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: impairment, restructuring

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

•Other selling, general, and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses increaseddecreased 2.511.8 percent to $639.6$564.3 million, primarily due to a $44.5 million loss onin the prior year related to the divestiture of our Europe Surface Transportation business.business Theand prior year includedrestructuring $19.6charges millionfor of charges, primarilyimpairments related to the divestiture ofreducing our operationsfacilities in Argentina.footprint. In addition, other SG&A expenses decreaseddeclined across several expense categories in the2025 currentdue year.to cost optimization efforts.
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: ai, supply chain

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (“C.H. Robinson,” “the company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) is one of the largest global logistics providers in the world, with consolidated total revenues of $17.7$16.2 billion in 2024.2025. WeAs a leader in Lean AI supply chains, we deliver logistics like no one else. CompaniesFor aroundmore thethan worlda lookcentury, companies everywhere have looked to us to reimagine supplyhow chains,goods advance freight technology, and solve logistics challenges—from the simple to the complex.move. We are grounded in our promise to deliver exceptional customer success, using our expertise, scale, and tailored solutions toacross helpthe customersworld navigatevia increasinglytruckload, complexless-than-truckload, globalocean, air, and more. With our unique combination of human insight and Lean AI working as one, supply chains.chains move faster, smarter, and more sustainably.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (61)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 12 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (“C.H. Robinson,” “the company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) is one of the largest global logistics providers in the world, with consolidated total revenues of $17.7$16.2 billion in 2024.2025. WeAs a leader in Lean AI supply chains, we deliver logistics like no one else. CompaniesFor aroundmore thethan worlda lookcentury, companies everywhere have looked to us to reimagine supplyhow chains,goods advance freight technology, and solve logistics challenges—from the simple to the complex.move. We are grounded in our promise to deliver exceptional customer success, using our expertise, scale, and tailored solutions toacross helpthe customersworld navigatevia increasinglytruckload, complexless-than-truckload, globalocean, air, and more. With our unique combination of human insight and Lean AI working as one, supply chains.chains move faster, smarter, and more sustainably.

Added

Carrier capacity in the North America surface transportation market continued to contract toward the end of 2025 as carriers exited the market. This gradual tightening, coupled with disruptive weather events and incremental pressures from the enforcement of commercial driver regulations, contributed to upward pressure on transportation rates. As a result, the market has become increasingly sensitive, with spot market rates exhibiting sharper than typical reactions to changes in supply and demand conditions. Despite these emerging pressures, the market has not fully transitioned into a sustained upcycle. Key indicators, such as truckload routing guide depth within our Managed Solutions business, have remained at historically low levels for nearly two years. Routing guide depth represents the average number of carriers contacted prior to acceptance when procuring a transportation provider. Average routing guide depth was 1.3 in the fourth quarter of 2025, compared to 1.2 for much of the prior two years. While this increase reflects early signs of a tightening market, soft demand conditions and remaining excess capacity continue to temper the pace of the shift.

Added

The global forwarding market continued to face a persistent imbalance in 2025, marked by excess vessel capacity and weak global demand. Despite carriers’ ongoing avoidance of the Suez Canal, which has resulted in longer transit times and strain on global networks, vessel capacity has remained elevated. While short periods of rate volatility have occurred due to shifting trade and tariff policies, front‑loading, seasonal factors, and carriers’ use of blank sailings, international freight rates have largely remained depressed as weak demand outweighed these pressures. Looking ahead, uncertainty persists due to geopolitical and macroeconomic factors, including evolving trade policies, the Red Sea conflict, and carriers’ ability to effectively manage excess capacity. Despite this uncertainty, we expect ocean pricing to remain under pressure until global freight demand meaningfully improves. Similar dynamics continue to affect the air freight market. Although demand has shown resilience in certain technology‑focused sectors, overall air freight pricing remains sensitive to tariff developments and broader economic conditions, including cost-efficient ocean freight rates.

Removed

The North America surface transportation market continued to experience excess carrier capacity relative to shipper demand throughout 2024, which resulted in an oversupplied and very competitive market. These conditions are typically referred to as a soft market and resulted in transportation rates at, or near, the estimated cost to operate a truck for much of 2024. Although carrier capacity has begun exiting the market, it has been at rates much slower than is typically seen at this stage of the market cycle. One of the key metrics we use to measure market conditions is the truckload routing guide depth from our Managed Solutions business. Routing guide depth represents the average number of carriers contacted prior to acceptance when procuring a transportation provider. Average routing guide depth has remained low throughout 2024 and finished the year at 1.3, representing that on average, the first carrier in a shipper’s routing guide was executing the shipment in most cases. Average routing guide depth at the end of 2023 was 1.2 and held at that level before increasing slightly at the end of 2024.

Removed

The global forwarding market experienced significant volatility in 2024, impacted by re-routing, extended transit times, and improving demand. Most carriers avoided the Suez Canal for the majority of 2024 due to the Red Sea conflict, which increased transit times, straining global carrier capacity. Consequently, ocean freight rates have remained elevated compared to the prior year. Uncertainty remains on how the Red Sea conflict, along with geopolitical factors and new capacity entering the market, will impact the global forwarding market in 2025. The global air freight market has largely stabilized, although air freight costs remain elevated compared to the prior year. The elevated ecommerce export demand from Asia during much of 2024 resulted in the repositioning of air freight capacity to that trade lane, causing freighter capacity shortages in other trade lanes and driving up pricing in the market in certain trade lanes.

Added

Our surface transportation results in 2025 reflected the challenging market conditions described above, including the increase in transportation rates as capacity tightened in the market near the end of the year. Throughout the year, we continued to advance our dynamic pricing and costing capabilities, navigating both the prolonged softness in demand and the rising cost environment that emerged toward year‑end. These enhanced capabilities allowed us to better react to changing market conditions and led to an improvement in adjusted gross profit per transaction in 2025 compared to 2024. Our average truckload linehaul rate charged to customers, excluding fuel surcharges, increased approximately 2.5 percent during 2025 reflecting our advanced dynamic pricing. Our average truckload linehaul cost per mile, excluding fuel surcharges, increased approximately 2.0 percent over the same period, reflecting our disciplined costing capabilities. Despite operating in a persistently soft market for much of the year, our combined North American Surface Transportation (“NAST”) truckload and LTL volumes significantly outperformed the Cass Freight Index increasing 1.0 percent compared to 2024.

Removed

Our 2024 surface transportation results were largely consistent with the trends discussed in the market trends section and similar to trends experienced in the prior year. The weak freight demand and excess carrier capacity in the market resulted in most shipments moving under committed pricing agreements and suppressed freight rates on the limited number of shipments reaching the spot market for most of 2024. Despite these challenging market conditions, we were able to improve our adjusted gross profit per transaction in 2024 compared to 2023 as a result of disciplined pricing and capacity procurement efforts leading to better adjusted gross profits per transaction within our transactional portfolio. Our average truckload linehaul cost per mile, excluding fuel surcharges, decreased approximately 5.5 percent during 2024. Our average truckload linehaul rate charged to our customers, excluding fuel surcharges, decreased approximately 5.0 percent during 2024.

Reworded

Our 2024 Global Forwarding results in 2025 were largely consistent with the market trends discussed aboveabove. inThroughout the marketyear, trends section. Wewe experienced elevatedshort-lived purchasedperiods transportationof costs in 2024 compared to the prior year, resulting in increased total revenuespricing and costvolume ofvolatility purchasedlargely transportationassociated inwith shifting trade policies. Despite this volatility, overall ocean services.freight Inrates 2024,and volumes declined from the global forwarding market faced disruptions that led to a significant rise in freight rates. This contrasts with 2023, which saw weak demand and elevated levels of capacity. These market dynamics resultedobserved in a2024, notableprimarily increasedue into bothexcess totalvessel revenuescapacity and costweak ofglobal purchasedconsumer transportation compared to the previous year.demand. Our total ocean freight volumes increaseddecreased 5.54.5 percent while our air freight tonnage increaseddecreased 17.011.5 percent in 20242025 compared to the prior year.

Reworded

•Total revenues increaseddecreased 0.78.4 percent to $17.7$16.2 billion, primarily driven by higherthe divestiture of our Europe Surface Transportation business, in addition to lower pricing and volume in our ocean services,services partially offset byand lower pricingfuel and volumesurcharges in our truckload services.

Reworded

•Gross profits increaseddecreased 5.81.8 percent to $2.7 billion. Adjusted gross profits increaseddecreased 6.21.3 percent to $2.8$2.7 billion, primarily driven by lower adjusted gross profit per transaction in our ocean services and the divestiture of our Europe Surface Transportation business, which were partially offset by higher adjusted gross profit per transaction in our truckloadLTL, truckload, and oceancustoms services.

Reworded

•Personnel expenses decreased 0.65.9 percent to $1.5$1.4 billion, primarily due to cost optimizationcost-optimization efforts and productivity improvements, partially offset by higher variable compensationimprovements and higherthe restructuringdivestiture chargesof relatedour toEurope workforceSurface reductions.Transportation business. Average employee headcount decreased 10.311.5 percent.

Reworded

•Other selling, general, and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses increaseddecreased 2.511.8 percent to $639.6$564.3 million, primarily due to a $44.5 million loss onin the prior year related to the divestiture of our Europe Surface Transportation business.business Theand prior year includedrestructuring $19.6charges millionfor of charges, primarilyimpairments related to the divestiture ofreducing our operationsfacilities in Argentina.footprint. In addition, other SG&A expenses decreaseddeclined across several expense categories in the2025 currentdue year.to cost optimization efforts.

Reworded

•Income from operations totaled $669.1$795.0 million, up 30.018.8 percent from last year, due to an increase in adjusted gross profits, partially offset by the increasedecrease in operating expenses. Adjusted operating margin of 24.229.1 percent increased 440490 basis points.

Reworded

•Interest and other income/expenses, net totaled $89.9$72.5 million, which primarily consisted of $85.9$63.1 million of interest expense, which decreased $4.3$22.8 million versus last year due to a lower average debt balance.balance and lower variable interest rates. The current year results also included aan $7.4$11.2 million net loss from foreign currency revaluation and realized foreign currency gains and losses.

Added

•The effective tax rate for 2025 was 18.7 percent compared to 19.6 percent in 2024. The lower rate was driven by higher foreign tax credits, higher tax benefits from share-based compensation, and the prior year impact of the divestiture of our European Surface Transportation business, partially offset by a reduced benefit from U.S. tax credits in the current year and non-recurring discrete items in the prior year.

Removed

•The effective tax rate for 2024 was 19.6 percent compared to 20.5 percent in 2023. The lower rate in the current year was driven by the impact of non-recurring discrete items and higher U.S. tax credits, partially offset by higher pre-tax income and lower foreign tax credits.

Added

Total revenues and direct costs. Total revenues and direct costs decreased primarily due to the divestiture of our Europe Surface Transportation business, as well as lower pricing and volume in our ocean services and lower fuel surcharges in our truckload services. During 2024, ocean transportation revenues and direct costs were elevated as a result of ongoing disruptions, including the Red Sea conflict, which strained capacity and increased ocean freight rates. While short periods of rate volatility occurred during 2025, driven by shifting trade policies, front-loading, seasonal factors, and carriers’ use of blank sailings, overall ocean freight rates have largely remained depressed as weak demand outweighed these pressures. Our sourcing total revenue and direct costs increased, driven by increased case volume with retail and foodservice customers.

Added

Gross profits and adjusted gross profits. Our transportation adjusted gross profits decreased due to lower adjusted gross profit per transaction in our ocean services and the divestiture of our Europe Surface Transportation business. These impacts were partially offset by increased adjusted gross profit per transaction in our LTL, truckload, and customs services. The decline in ocean services was largely attributable to the significant reduction in market pricing during 2025, compared to the same period in 2024 discussed above. Conversely, the increase in adjusted gross profit per transaction in LTL and truckload services reflects the continued advancement of our dynamic pricing and costing capabilities. These advancements have allowed us to respond more rapidly to market fluctuations through more frequent and precise pricing discovery. Sourcing adjusted gross profits increased, driven by an increase in integrated supply chain solutions for foodservice and retail customers.

Removed

Total revenues and direct costs. Total revenues and direct costs were essentially flat with the prior year with significant offsetting impacts from ocean and truckload services. Ocean transportation revenues and direct costs increased, driven by the volatile market conditions experienced in 2024, as discussed in the market trends section above, which significantly impacted carrier capacity and led to increased ocean freight rates. Conversely, truckload transportation revenues and direct costs decreased compared to the prior year. This decline in truckload pricing and purchased transportation costs was driven by the soft market conditions in surface transportation, characterized by an oversupply of carrier capacity throughout most of 2024. Our sourcing total revenue and direct costs increased, driven by higher average pricing with retail customers and increased case volume with foodservice customers.

Removed

Gross profits and adjusted gross profits. Our transportation adjusted gross profits increased due to higher adjusted gross profits per transaction in ocean and truckload services, in addition to increased volumes in our ocean service line. The higher adjusted gross profits per transaction in ocean services were driven by the challenges facing the global forwarding market, which resulted in elevated pricing. In truckload services, the increase was driven by the improved execution and disciplined pricing and capacity procurement efforts from our team within our transactional portfolio during 2024. Sourcing adjusted gross profits increased, driven by an increase in integrated supply chain solutions for retail and foodservice customers.

Reworded

Operating expenses. Personnel expenses decreased, primarily due to cost optimization efforts including lower average employee headcountheadcount, partiallyas offsetwell by higher variable compensation reflectingas the improvedimpact results compared to the prior year. Other SG&A expenses increased primarily due toof the divestiture of our Europe Surface Transportation business,business. whichOther wasSG&A partiallyexpenses offsetalso decreased, driven by the impactprior ofyear loss recognized on the divestiture of our ArgentinaEurope operationsSurface Transportation business and prior year restructuring charges related to reducing our facilities footprint. In addition, other SG&A expenses decreased across several expense categories in 2023the discussedcurrent below.year.

Reworded

In addition to the above, our personnel expenses for 20242025 included $24.1$30.0 million of severance and related personnel expenses related to our 20242025 Restructuring Program. In addition, other SG&A expenses for 2025 included $2.5 million of expenses associated with our 2025 Restructuring Program and the divestiture of our Europe Surface Transportation business. We also incurred $66.2$8.8 million in other SG&A expenses in 2024. These expenses were2025, primarily due tofrom a $44.5$6.3 million lossimpairment relatedcharge toon our Kansas City regional center lease resulting from the divestitureexecution of oura Europesublease Surfaceagreement Transportationon businessa andportion $21.9of millionthe related to our 2024 Restructuring Program.building.

Reworded

Our personnel expenses for 20232024 included $18.4$24.1 million of severance and related personnel expenses related to our 20222024 Restructuring Program. We also incurred $19.6$66.2 million ofin other SG&A expenses in 2024. These expenses were primarily due to a $44.5 million loss related to the divestiture of our ArgentinaEurope operations.Surface Transportation business and $21.9 million related to our 2024 Restructuring Program. Refer to Note 14, Restructuring, for further discussion related to our 20242025 and 20222024 Restructuring Programs. Refer to Note 15, Divestitures, for further discussion related to the divestiture of our Europe Surface Transportation business and Argentina operations.business.

Reworded

Interest and other income/expense, net. Interest and other income/expense, net was $89.9$72.5 million, primarily consistedconsisting of $85.9$63.1 million of interest expense, which decreased $4.3$22.8 million compared to the prior year due to a lower average debt balance.balance and lower variable interest rates. The current year also included aan $7.4$11.2 million unfavorable impact from foreign currency revaluation and realized foreign currency gains and losses. The prior year included a $24.4$7.4 million unfavorable impact from foreign currency revaluation and realized foreign currency gains and losses driven by a $16.4 million foreign currency loss related to the devaluation of the Argentine Peso.losses.

Added

Provision for income taxes. Our effective income tax rate was 18.7 percent in 2025 and 19.6 percent in 2024. The lower rate was driven by higher foreign tax credits, higher tax benefits from shared-based compensation, and the prior year impact of the divestiture of our European Surface Transportation business, which reduced our effective tax rate compared to the prior year by 4.2 percentage points, 2.6 percentage points, and 1.3 percentage points, respectively. These reductions were partially offset by a lower benefit from U.S. tax credits and non-recurring discrete items in the prior year, which increased our effective tax rate compared to the prior year by 5.4 percentage points and 1.1 percentage points, respectively.

Removed

Provision for income taxes. Our effective income tax rate was 19.6 percent in 2024 and 20.5 percent in 2023. The effective income tax rate for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, was lower than the statutory federal income tax rate primarily due to the tax impact of U.S. tax credits and incentives and share-based payment awards, which reduced the effective tax rate by 5.3 percentage points and 1.8 percentage points, respectively. These impacts were partially offset by foreign tax credits and state income taxes, net of federal benefit, which increased the effective tax rate by 2.5 percentage points and 1.9 percentage points, respectively. The effective income tax rate for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023, was lower than the statutory federal income tax rate primarily due to the tax impact of foreign tax credits, U.S. tax credits and incentives, and the tax impact of share-based payment awards, which reduced the effective tax rate by 9.5 percentage points, 3.4 percentage points, and 2.7 percentage points, respectively. These impacts were partially offset by a higher tax rate on foreign earnings and the impact of a Section 199 domestic production activities settlement, which increased the effective tax rate by 5.8 percentage points and 4.7 percentage points, respectively.

Reworded

(1) Adjusted gross profitsprofit is a non-GAAP financial measure explained above.

Added

Total revenues and direct costs. NAST total revenues and direct costs decreased primarily due to lower fuel surcharges driven by a year-over-year decrease in diesel fuel prices and a shorter average length of haul in truckload services. These declines were partially offset by increased LTL and truckload volumes and an increase in truckload linehaul rates. Our average truckload linehaul rate per mile charged to our customers, which excludes fuel surcharges, increased approximately 2.5 percent. Our truckload linehaul cost per mile, excluding fuel surcharges, increased approximately 2.0 percent.

Removed

Total revenues and direct costs. NAST total revenues and direct costs decreased, driven by lower pricing and purchased transportation costs and a decline in volume in truckload services. The lower pricing and purchased transportation costs in truckload services were driven by the soft market conditions experienced throughout 2024 as the market remained in a prolonged stage of oversupplied carrier capacity. These declines were partially offset by increased revenues and direct costs in LTL services driven by increased volumes.

Reworded

Gross profits and adjusted gross profits. NAST adjusted gross profits increased,increased driven by truckload services due to higher adjusted gross profits per transaction partiallyin offset by a decline inboth truckload serviceand volumes.LTL Thisservices. The improvement was driven by improvedthe executioncontinued andadvancement disciplinedof our dynamic pricing and capacitycosting procurementcapabilities. withinThese ouradvancements transactionalhave portfolioallowed in 2024. Our average truckload linehaul rate per mile chargedus to ourrespond customers,more whichrapidly excludesto fuelmarket surcharges,fluctuations decreasedthrough approximatelymore 5.0 percent. Our truckload linehaul cost per mile, excluding fuel surcharges, decreased approximately 5.5 percent. Additionally, LTL services adjusted gross profits per transaction increased, driven by the improved executionfrequent and disciplinedprecise pricing efforts across our portfolio, in addition to an increase in volumes.discovery. NAST other adjusted gross profits decreased, primarily due to a declinedecrease in warehousing and intermodal adjusted gross profits.services.

Added

Operating expenses. NAST personnel expenses decreased driven by cost optimization efforts and productivity improvements, including lower average headcount. NAST other SG&A expenses were flat as higher allocated corporate expenses were offset by lower expenditures on purchased services, including contingent worker expenses, and lower occupancy expense.

Removed

Operating expenses. NAST personnel expenses increased, driven by an increase in variable compensation reflecting the improved results compared to the prior year. This increase was partially offset by cost optimization efforts, including lower average employee headcount in addition to lower allocated corporate expenses.

Reworded

In addition to the above, NAST personnel expenses for 2025 included $10.2 million of severance and related personnel expenses. We also incurred $0.4 million in restructuring related other SG&A expenses in 2025. These expenses were both associated with our 2025 Restructuring Program. Personnel expenses for 2024 included $10.2 million of severance and related personnel expenses. We also incurred $6.9 million in restructuring related other SG&A expenses in 2024. These expenses were both associated with our 2024 Restructuring Program. Personnel expenses for 2023 included $1.1 million of severance and related personnel expenses associated with our 2022 Restructuring Program. Refer to Note 14, Restructuring, for further discussion related to our 20242025 and 20222024 Restructuring Programs.

Reworded

(1)Adjusted gross profitsprofit is a non-GAAP financial measure explained above.

Added

Total revenues and direct costs. Global Forwarding total revenues and direct costs decreased driven by significantly lower pricing and purchased transportation costs in ocean services, in addition to lower volume in our ocean services. In 2024, ocean transportation revenues and direct costs were elevated due to global supply chain disruptions, including the Red Sea conflict, which strained capacity and elevated ocean freight rates. While short periods of rate volatility occurred during 2025, driven by shifting trade policies, front-loading, seasonal factors, and carriers’ use of blank sailings, overall ocean freight rates have largely remained depressed as weak demand outweighed these pressures. Many of these same market dynamics contributed to declines in total revenues and direct costs within our air freight services. During 2024, disruptions in the ocean freight market and heightened ecommerce demand out of North Asia increased air freight volumes and pricing in certain trade lanes. This contrasted with the comparatively weak consumer demand environment in 2025, which contributed to lower pricing and direct costs and lower volumes in air freight services.

Added

Gross profits and adjusted gross profits. Global Forwarding adjusted gross profits decreased driven by lower adjusted gross profit per shipment and lower volumes in ocean services. The decline in adjusted gross profit per shipment in ocean services reflected the significant reduction in market pricing during 2025 compared to the same period in 2024, as discussed above. Partially offsetting the decline, customs adjusted gross profits increased, driven by higher duty advance fees reflecting elevated global tariff rates in 2025.

Added

Operating expenses. Personnel expenses decreased primarily due to cost optimization efforts and productivity improvements and lower incentive compensation, partially offset by higher restructuring charges in the current year related to workforce reductions. Other SG&A expenses decreased with reductions across several expense categories; most notably lower claims expense.

Removed

Total revenues and direct costs. Global Forwarding total revenues and direct costs increased, driven by higher pricing and purchased transportation costs in ocean services in addition to volume increases across all global forwarding transportation services. The higher pricing and purchased transportation costs in ocean services were driven by the volatile market conditions in 2024 discussed in the market trends section above, which significantly impacted carrier capacity and led to increased ocean freight rates in 2024. Additionally, disruptions in the ocean freight market resulted in increased air freight tonnage in 2024, driven by ocean freight conversions in many trade lanes. These ocean freight conversions, coupled with heightened ecommerce demand out of North Asia and stronger peak season volumes compared to 2023, elevated air freight costs in certain trade lanes in 2024. The volatile market conditions in 2024 contrasted with the weak demand, elevated capacity, and suppressed freight rates experienced in 2023.

Removed

Gross profits and adjusted gross profits. Global Forwarding adjusted gross profits increased, driven by higher adjusted gross profits per shipment and an increase in volumes in ocean services driven by the challenges facing the global forwarding market, which resulted in elevated pricing. This compared to a market characterized by weak freight demand and excess carrier capacity in 2023. Air freight adjusted gross profits increased due an increase in metric tons shipped which was partially offset by lower adjusted gross profits per metric ton shipped. The decrease in adjusted gross profits per metric ton shipped, was driven by sharp increases to the cost of air freight in certain trade lanes during 2024 compared to 2023. Customs adjusted gross profits increased, driven by higher transaction volumes and an increase in adjusted gross profits per transaction.

Removed

Operating expenses. Personnel expenses increased primarily due to increased variable compensation reflecting the improved results relative to the prior year. This increase was partially offset by cost optimization efforts, including lower average employee headcount. Other SG&A expenses decreased, as the prior year included an $18.0 million loss related to the divestiture of our Argentina operations. Additionally, other SG&A expenses declined in the current year related to lower allocated corporate expenses and lower amortization expenses following the completion of amortization of intangible assets from a prior acquisition. These decreases were partially offset by a higher provision for credit losses as the prior year benefited from a reduction to the allowance for credit losses.

Reworded

In addition to the above, personnel expenses for 2025 included $15.0 million of severance and related personnel expenses. We also incurred $1.2 million in other SG&A expenses in 2025. These expenses were both associated with our 2025 Restructuring Program. Personnel expenses for 2024 included $6.9 million of severance and related personnel expenses. We also incurred $4.7 million in other SG&A expenses in 2024. These expenses were both associated with our 2024 Restructuring Program. Personnel expenses for 2023 included $3.8 million of severance and related personnel expenses. Other SG&A in 2023 included $18.2 million primarily related to disposal and exit activities, including asset impairments. These expenses were associated with our 2022 Restructuring Program and the divestiture of our Argentina operations. Refer to Note 14, Restructuring, for further discussion related to our 20242025 and 20222024 Restructuring Programs. Refer to Note 15, Divestitures, for further discussion related to the divestiture of our Argentina operations.

Reworded

(1) Adjusted gross profitsprofit is a non-GAAP financial measure explained above.

Added

Total revenues and direct costs. Total revenues and direct costs decreased, driven by the divestiture of our Europe Surface Transportation business on February 1, 2025. Partially offsetting this decrease was an increase in total revenues in our Robinson Fresh business driven by increased case volume with retail and foodservice customers.

Removed

Total revenues and direct costs. Total revenues and direct costs increased, driven by higher average pricing with retail customers and increased case volume with foodservice customers in our Robinson Fresh business. This increase was partially offset by a decline in European truckload pricing and volume in our Other Surface Transportation business resulting in a decline in total revenues and direct costs.

Reworded

Gross profits and adjusted gross profits. Robinson Fresh adjusted gross profits increased duedriven toby an increase in integrated supply chain solutions for retail and foodservice customers. Managed Solutions adjusted gross profits decreasedincreased due to loweran transactionincrease volume.in freight under management. Other Surface Transportation adjusted gross profits decreased primarily due toas a decreaseresult inof adjustedthe grossdivestiture profitsof perour transactionEurope inSurface EuropeanTransportation truckload and a decrease in European truckload volumes.business.

Added

Restructuring, lease impairment charge, and divestiture expenses. Personnel expenses in 2025 included $4.8 million of severance and related personnel expenses associated with our 2025 Restructuring Program and the divestiture of our Europe Surface Transportation business. We also incurred $7.2 million in other SG&A expenses in 2025, primarily from a $6.3 million impairment charge on our Kansas City regional center lease resulting from the execution of a sublease agreement on a portion of the building. In addition, other SG&A expenses for 2025 included $0.9 million loss related to the divestiture of our Europe Surface Transportation business.

Reworded

Operating expenses. Personnel expenses in 2024, for All Other and Corporate included $7.0 million of severance and related personnel expensesexpenses, primarily associated with our 2024 Restructuring Program. We also incurred $54.5 million of other SG&A expenses in 2024, that included a $44.5 million loss related to the divestiture of our Europe Surface Transportation business. Personnel expenses in 2023, included $13.5 million of severance and related personnel expenses. We also incurred $1.5 million of other SG&A expenses in 2023. These expenses were associated with our 2022 Restructuring Program and the divestiture of our Argentina operations. Refer to Note 14, Restructuring, for further discussion related to our 20242025 and 20222024 Restructuring Programs. Refer to Note 15, Divestitures, for further discussion related to the divestituresdivestiture of our Europe Surface Transportation business and Argentina operations.business.

Reworded

Cash and cash equivalents totaled $160.9 million as of December 31, 2025, and $145.8 million as of December 31, 2024, and $145.5 million as of December 31, 2023.2024. Cash and cash equivalents held outside the United States totaled $144.9 million as of December 31, 2025, and $134.0 million as of December 31, 2024, and $142.8 million as of December 31, 2023.2024. Working capital decreasedincreased from $828.7 million at December 31, 2023, to $644.7 million at December 31, 2024.2024, to $966.8 million at December 31, 2025.

Reworded

Cash flowflows from operating activities. WeCash generated significant cash flowflows from operating activities increased significantly in 2024,2025, driven byreflecting our strong operating resultsperformance and increased net income. The increase tohigher net income wasversus offsetthe byprior elevatedyear. freightOperating ratescash flows also benefited from a significant reduction in ocean services,freight drivencosts bycompared to the factorselevated rates experienced in 2024, as further discussed in the market trends and business trends sections above, which resulted in an increase in net operating working capital and negatively impacted our cash flow from operations. In 2023, our results were adversely impacted by weak freight demand and excess carrier capacity, which significantly decreased our net operating working capital and benefited our cash flow from operations.above. We continue to closely monitor credit and collections activities and the quality of our accounts receivable balance to minimize risk as well as work with our customers to facilitate the movement of goods across their supply chains while also ensuring timely payment.

Reworded

Cash used for investing activities. Our investing activities consist primarily of capital expenditures and cash paid for acquisitions. Capital expenditures consisted primarily of investments in software, which are intended to deliver scalable solutionssolutions, including those driven by transformingAI, that transform our processes, acceleratingimprove our customer and contract carrier experience, accelerate the pace of development, prioritizingand data integrity, improvingimprove our customerdynamic pricing and carriercosting experience, and increasing our efficiency to help expand our adjusted operating margins and grow the business.capabilities.

Added

The sale of our Europe Surface Transportation business closed effective February 1, 2025. We received $27.7 million of consideration at closing with additional fixed installment payments due throughout 2026. The remaining consideration due is collateralized by all current and future accounts receivable of the Europe Surface Transportation business.

Removed

During 2022, we sold an office building in Kansas City, Missouri, for a sales price of $55.0 million and recognized a gain of $23.5 million on the sale. We simultaneously entered into an agreement to lease the office building for 10 years.

Reworded

Cash used for financing activities. Net cash used for financing activities increased significantly in 2025 compared to 2024, driven by an increase in cash returned to shareholders and net payments on outstanding borrowings. In 2025, we resumed share repurchases under our board authorization and increased our annual dividend to shareholders. Despite the increase in cash returned to shareholders our strong cash flow from operations allowed us to reduce our outstanding borrowings on debt. We had net repayments on debt in 20242025, 2024, and 2023 and net borrowings on debt in 2022.2023. Net repayments in 2025 and 2024 were primarily to decrease the outstanding balance on the RevolvingReceivables CreditSecuritization Facility and the ReceivablesRevolving SecuritizationCredit Facility. Net repayments in 2023 were primarily to repay the Senior Notes Series A, which matured in August 2023, and the 364-Day Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility, which matured in May 2023. Net borrowings in 2022 were primarily to fund share repurchases and working capital needs in the first half of 2022.

Removed

The decrease in cash used for share repurchases was due to a significant decrease in the number of shares repurchased in 2023 compared to 2022 as minimal shares were repurchased in the second half of 2023. No shares were repurchased in 2024.

Reworded

In December 2022, the Board of Directors increased the number of shares authorized to be repurchased by 20,000,000 shares. As of December 31, 2024,2025, there were 6,763,4453,669,530 shares remaining for future repurchases. TheOn numberOctober 28, 2025, the Board of sharesDirectors weapproved repurchase,an ifadditional any,$2.0 during future periods will vary based on our cash position, other potential usesbillion of ourauthorization cash,under the company’s share repurchase program. The stock repurchase program does not obligate the company to acquire any amount of common stock and marketshall conditions.expire or terminate at the Board's discretion; however, the company currently expects to execute the share repurchase program over a period of approximately three years. Over the long term, we remain committed to our quarterly dividend and share repurchases to enhance shareholder value. Such repurchases, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions, and other factors. We may seek to retire or purchase our outstanding Senior Notes through open market cash purchases, privately negotiated transactions, or otherwise.

Added

We may seek to retire or purchase our outstanding Senior Notes through open market cash purchases, privately negotiated transactions, or otherwise.

Reworded

Recognizing revenue for contracts where the transit period is partially complete or completed and not yet invoiced at period end requires management to make judgments that affect the amounts and timing of revenue recognized at period end. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we recorded revenue of $200.3$156.4 million for services we have provided while a shipment was still in-transit, but for which we had not yet completed our performance obligation or had not yet invoiced our customer compared to $189.9$200.3 million at December 31, 2023.2024. The amount of revenue recognized for contracts where the transit period was partially complete increaseddecreased as of December 31, 2024,2025, compared to December 31, 2023,2024, driven by the macroeconomic and industry factors impactingreducing the cost of purchased transportation and sell rates in ocean services. See Item 7 of Part II, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for further information.

Reworded

In the Step One Analysis, the fair value of each reporting unit is determined using either a discounted cash flow analysis, the market approach, or a combination of both. Projecting discounted future cash flows requires the use of significant judgementjudgment to make significant estimates regarding future revenues and expenses, projected capital expenditures, changes in working capital, and the appropriate discount rate. Use of the market approach consists of comparisons to comparable publicly-traded companies that are similar in size and industry. Actual results may differ from those used in our valuations when a Step One Analysis is performed.

Removed

On July 27, 2024, we entered into an agreement to sell our Europe Surface Transportation business. The sale included the assets and liabilities of the Europe Surface Transportation business other than its proprietary technology platform (the “disposal group”). As a result of the divestiture, the Europe Surface Transportation disposal group was classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2024. We have tested the goodwill of the Europe Surface Transportation reporting unit as of December 31, 2024, by performing Step One Analysis, before measuring the fair value of the disposal group to be presented as held for sale. We determined that the $28.6 million goodwill balance was not impaired.

Removed

Our Europe Surface Transportation Step One Analysis was completed using a combination of the market approach and a discounted cash flow analysis. The market approach was completed to determine the fair value of the Europe Surface Transportation business, excluding its proprietary technology platform, and was equal to the agreed-upon sale price of the business. As the sale does not include a technology platform necessary to run the business, a discounted cash flow analysis was completed to determine the fair value of the Europe Surface Transportation proprietary technology platform. The computed fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value. As noted in Note 15, Divestitures, the sale of the Europe Surface Transportation disposal group was completed in February 2025.

Showing the first 60 of 61 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-07-31 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-05-01 (period ending 2026-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

4new paragraphs
0removed paragraphs
1reworded paragraphs
124 → 719words in section

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: litigation
“Recent legal developments, including the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, have clarified that state-law negligence claims related to the selection of motor carriers by freight brokers are not preempted by federal law in certain circumstances. As a result, plaintiffs have pursued, and may increasingly pursue, allegations that we failed to exercise reasonable care in selecting or retaining third-party motor carriers, and courts may permit such claims to proceed under a range of state law standards that may vary by jurisdiction. …”
see in full comparison
New text
“In North America, as a property freight broker, we are not legally liable for loss or damage to our customers’ cargo. In our customer contracts, we may agree to assume cargo liability up to a stated maximum. We typically do not assume cargo liability to our customers above minimum industry standards in our international freight forwarding, ocean transportation, or air freight businesses on international or domestic air shipments. Although we are not legally liable for loss or damage to our customers’ cargo, from time to time, claims may be asserted against us for cargo losses. …”
see in full comparison
New text
“A material increase in the frequency or severity of accidents, liability claims, workers’ compensation claims, or unfavorable resolutions of claims could materially and adversely affect our operating results. In addition, actual or perceived increases in our exposure to liability, including those arising from developments such as the Montgomery decision, may result in significant increases in insurance costs, higher deductibles or self-insured retentions, more restrictive coverage terms, or the inability to purchase insurance on commercially reasonable terms. …”
see in full comparison
New text
“We are subject to claims arising from our transportation operations. We use the services of thousands of third-party transportation companies in connection with our transportation operations. From time to time, the drivers employed and engaged by the motor carriers with which we contract are involved in accidents, which may result in serious personal injuries. The resulting types and/or amounts of damages may be excluded by or exceed the amount of insurance coverage maintained by the contracted motor carrier. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report, you should carefully consider the factors disclosed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, which could materially affect our business, financial condition, or future results. ThereExcept for the updates to the risk factor set forth below, there have not been material changes in our risk factors set forth in the company’s 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and/or operating results.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (5)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report, you should carefully consider the factors disclosed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, which could materially affect our business, financial condition, or future results. ThereExcept for the updates to the risk factor set forth below, there have not been material changes in our risk factors set forth in the company’s 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and/or operating results.

Added

We are subject to claims arising from our transportation operations. We use the services of thousands of third-party transportation companies in connection with our transportation operations. From time to time, the drivers employed and engaged by the motor carriers with which we contract are involved in accidents, which may result in serious personal injuries. The resulting types and/or amounts of damages may be excluded by or exceed the amount of insurance coverage maintained by the contracted motor carrier. Although these drivers are not our employees and are employees, owner-operators, or independent contractors working for the contracted motor carriers, claims may nevertheless be asserted against us for their actions or for our actions in selecting, retaining, or monitoring such carriers.

Added

Recent legal developments, including the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, have clarified that state-law negligence claims related to the selection of motor carriers by freight brokers are not preempted by federal law in certain circumstances. As a result, plaintiffs have pursued, and may increasingly pursue, allegations that we failed to exercise reasonable care in selecting or retaining third-party motor carriers, and courts may permit such claims to proceed under a range of state law standards that may vary by jurisdiction. Claims against us may exceed the amount of our insurance coverage or may not be covered by insurance at all. As discussed in Note 7, Litigation, we are currently facing a negligent hire claim of this nature related to our selection of an independent motor carrier. Further, this evolving legal landscape may result in increased litigation activity, greater scrutiny of our carrier selection and oversight practices, and higher defense and settlement costs.

Added

A material increase in the frequency or severity of accidents, liability claims, workers’ compensation claims, or unfavorable resolutions of claims could materially and adversely affect our operating results. In addition, actual or perceived increases in our exposure to liability, including those arising from developments such as the Montgomery decision, may result in significant increases in insurance costs, higher deductibles or self-insured retentions, more restrictive coverage terms, or the inability to purchase insurance on commercially reasonable terms. Insurers may also revise underwriting standards applicable to freight brokers, including with respect to carrier vetting, compliance, and documentation practices. Our involvement in the transportation of certain goods, including but not limited to, hazardous materials, could also increase our exposure in the event one of our contracted motor carriers is involved in an accident resulting in injuries or contamination.

Added

In North America, as a property freight broker, we are not legally liable for loss or damage to our customers’ cargo. In our customer contracts, we may agree to assume cargo liability up to a stated maximum. We typically do not assume cargo liability to our customers above minimum industry standards in our international freight forwarding, ocean transportation, or air freight businesses on international or domestic air shipments. Although we are not legally liable for loss or damage to our customers’ cargo, from time to time, claims may be asserted against us for cargo losses. We maintain a broad cargo liability insurance policy to help protect us against catastrophic losses that may not be recovered from the responsible contracted carrier. Currently, we also carry various liability insurance policies, including automobile and general liability, with total automobile limits of $135 million subject to a $10 million per incident deductible, and total general liability limits of $87 million subject to a $500,000 per incident deductible.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

34new paragraphs
11removed paragraphs
33reworded paragraphs
4,478 → 7,048words in section

New heading “Consolidated Results of Operations—Six Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”

New heading “Six Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”

New heading “Six Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”

New heading “Six Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: impairment, restructuring, workforce reduction
“Operating expenses. Personnel expenses increased primarily due to higher restructuring charges related to workforce reductions. These increases were partially offset by cost optimization initiatives and productivity improvements, including a lower average employee headcount. Other SG&A expenses decreased primarily due to lower occupancy costs and reductions across several expense categories. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: impairment, restructuring
“All Other and Corporate personnel expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2025, included $1.8 million of severance and related personnel expenses associated with the divestiture of our Europe Surface Transportation business and our 2025 Restructuring Program. Other SG&A expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2025, included a $1.6 million loss related to the divestiture of our Europe Surface Transportation business and a $6.3 million lease impairment charge related to our Kansas City regional center resulting from the execution of a sublease agreement on a portion of the facility.”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: impairment, restructuring

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

OurAll Other and Corporate personnel expenses for the firstsecond quarter of 2025 included $1.2$0.6 million of severance and related personnel expenses andassociated $1.2with millionour of2025 otherRestructuring Program. Other SG&A expenses resultingfor fromthe second quarter of 2025 included $0.4 million related to restructuring activities and the divestiture of our Europe Surface Transportation business. Refer to Note 14, Divestitures, for further discussion related to the divestiture of our Europe Surface Transportation business.business Weand alsoNote incurred13, $6.3Restructuring, millionfor offurther otherdiscussion SG&Arelated expensesto in the first quarter ofour 2025 resultingRestructuring from an impairment charge on our Kansas City regional center lease resulting from the execution of a sublease agreement on a portion of the building.Program.
see in full comparison
New text topics: tariff, middle east
“Total revenues and direct costs. Global Forwarding total revenues decreased, primarily driven by lower volumes in both ocean and air freight services and, to a lesser extent, lower pricing in ocean services. These decreases were mostly offset by higher pricing in air services, including the impact of higher fuel surcharges. The higher pricing in the air freight market also contributed to an increase in purchased transportation costs compared to the prior year. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: restructuring, workforce reduction
“Operating expenses. NAST personnel expenses increased driven by higher restructuring charges related to workforce reductions and higher incentive compensation reflecting our strong operating performance. These increases were partially offset by cost optimization efforts and productivity improvements, including lower average employee headcount. NAST other SG&A expenses increased primarily due to higher allocated corporate expenses and higher claims expense.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: impairment, restructuring
“Our personnel expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2025 included $5.1 million of severance and related personnel expenses incurred in connection with our 2025 Restructuring Program and the divestiture of our Europe Surface Transportation business. In addition, other SG&A included $7.8 million of expense also associated with the divestiture and the Kansas City regional center impairment discussed above.”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (78)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 4 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including this discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations and our disclosures about market risk, contains certain “forward-looking statements.” These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our historical experience or our present expectations, including, but not limited to, factors such as changes in economic conditions, including uncertain consumer demand; changes in market demand and pressures on the pricing for our services; fuel price increases or decreases, or fuel shortages; competition and growth rates within the global logistics industry that could adversely impact our profitability and ability to achieve our long-term growth targets; freight levels and increasing costs and availability of truck capacity or alternative means of transporting freight; risks associated with seasonal changes or significant disruptions in the transportation industry; risks associated with identifying and completing suitable acquisitions; our dependence upon and changes in relationships with existing contracted truck, rail, ocean, and air carriers; risks associated with the loss of significant customers; risks associated with reliance on technology to operate our businessbusiness, including reliance on third-party platforms; cybersecurity related risks; our ability to staff and retain employees; risks associated with operations outside of the United States; our ability to successfully integrate the operations of acquired companies with our historic operations or efficiently manage divestitures; climate change related risks; risks associated with our indebtedness; risks associated with interest rates; risks associated with litigation, including contingent auto liability and insurance coverage; risks associated with the potential impact of changes in government regulationsregulations, including environmental-related regulations; risks associated with the changes to income tax regulations; risks associated with the produce industry, including food safety and contamination issues; the impact of changes in political and governmental conditions; changes to our capital structure; changes due to catastrophic events; risks associated with the usage of artificial intelligence technologies; risks associated with cybersecurity events; and other risks and uncertainties, including those described in Item 1A. Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 13, 2026, as well as the updates to these risk factors included in Part II—“Item 1A, Risk Factors,” herein.

Added

The North American surface transportation market continued to tighten during the second quarter of 2026, extending the trend that emerged in late 2025 and accelerated in early 2026. Carrier capacity contracted further as regulatory enforcement activity impacting driver availability, combined with elevated operating costs, continued to strain capacity. These supply-side dynamics, rather than a meaningful recovery in underlying freight demand, remained the primary driver of higher transportation rates, with truckload spot rates rising sharply on a year-over-year basis. Seasonal produce and beverage demand, along with disruptive events such as the International Roadcheck enforcement period, further tightened regional capacity and contributed to temporary spikes in spot rates. As truckload rates increased, some shippers shifted freight to less-than-truckload solutions to improve transportation efficiency and manage costs, contributing to stronger demand trends in portions of the less than truckload (“LTL”) market. In addition, escalating geopolitical tensions in the Middle East disrupted global oil flows and drove diesel fuel prices to multi-year highs during the quarter before easing later in the period, adding further cost pressure and volatility to all-in transportation rates. Underlying freight demand remained subdued, and industry freight volumes, as measured by the Cass Freight Index, declined 3.3 percent in the second quarter of 2026 compared to the second quarter of 2025.

Removed

During the first quarter of 2026, the North American surface transportation market experienced heightened volatility, driven primarily by tightening carrier capacity and rising operating costs, while freight demand showed only limited signs of recovery. Capacity pressures increased as regulatory enforcement activity and higher operating costs accelerated carrier attrition, contributing to higher market pricing. These conditions were exacerbated by winter weather, which created regional capacity constraints. In addition, escalating geopolitical uncertainty contributed to higher diesel fuel prices, further increasing all-in transportation rates and adding near-term cost pressure and operational complexity for both carriers and shippers.

Reworded

One of the key metrics we use to measure market conditions is the truckload routing guide depth from our Managed Solutions business. This metric measures the average number of carriers contacted before securing a transportation provider. RoutingA routing guide depth of 1 would be perfect performance and 2 would be extremely poor. As carrier capacity tightened during the quarter, routing guide performance deteriorated, withThe average routing guide depth increasing to 1.5 in the firstsecond quarter of 2026,2026 was 1.4 compared to 1.3 in both the fourthsecond quarter of 20252025, andreflecting a further tightening of the firstmarket quartercompared ofto 2025.the prior year.

Added

During the second quarter of 2026, the global forwarding market remained driven primarily by supply-side dynamics rather than underlying demand conditions. Market conditions were shaped by intensifying geopolitical disruption, elevated fuel costs, and ocean carriers' continued capacity management actions, including blank sailings. Ongoing conflict in the Middle East severely constrained transits and continued the rerouting of Asia-to-Europe vessels around the Cape of Good Hope, which continues to extend transit times and reduced effective capacity. Ocean freight rates rose sharply during the second quarter of 2026 as these supply-side pressures, combined with the early onset of peak-season demand and customer front-loading of holiday and retail inventory, outpaced available capacity. Rate increases were further amplified by conflict and fuel-related surcharges, rather than by a broad-based recovery in underlying freight demand. The air freight market experienced a similar supply-driven tightening, as airspace restrictions and reduced carrier operations in the Middle East contracted global cargo capacity, lengthened flight routings, and increased operating costs, although capacity began to stabilize late in the quarter. These constraints, together with a sharp increase in jet fuel prices, drove air freight rates meaningfully higher during the quarter.

Added

Looking ahead, conflict-related disruptions, the pace of capacity normalization, and evolving trade and tariff policy are likely to continue to drive volatility in ocean and air freight pricing in the near term, although the ultimate extent and duration remain uncertain.

Removed

Looking ahead, continued uncertainty related to fuel prices, regulatory enforcement impacting driver availability, and geopolitical disruptions may continue to drive volatility and exert upward pressure on transportation rates as the industry enters the seasonally stronger spring and summer months.

Removed

During the first quarter of 2026, the global forwarding market was influenced primarily by supply-side dynamics rather than underlying demand conditions. Market conditions reflected the impact of conflict-related rerouting, elevated fuel costs, and carriers’ strategic capacity management actions, including blank sailings. This compared to the first quarter of 2025, where ocean freight volumes accelerated ahead of anticipated tariff implementations. Ocean freight rates declined substantially during the first quarter of 2026 driven by excess vessel capacity but were increasingly influenced by fuel-related surcharges. The airfreight market remained balanced, mirroring the first quarter of 2025 although pricing was similarly affected by elevated fuel costs. Airspace restrictions related to the conflict in the Middle East resulted in longer flight times, contributing to increased fuel consumption and higher operating costs near the end of the first quarter of 2026.

Reworded

Our surface transportation business operatedcontinued to operate in a rising cost environment during the firstsecond quarter of 2026, as discussed in the Market Trends section. As a result of these challengingtightening market conditions, our average truckload linehaul cost per mile, excluding fuel surcharges, increased approximately 13.029.0 percent during the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to the firstsecond quarter of 2025. Our average truckload linehaul rate charged to our customers, excluding fuel surcharges, increased approximately 11.025.5 percent during the firstsecond quarter of 2026.2026 Despitecompared to the rapidlysecond increasingquarter of 2025. The sharper acceleration in cost environment,relative weto improvedrate reflected the supply-driven tightening described above, as carrier capacity contraction and diesel fuel price volatility drove costs higher faster than contractual rates could reprice. In truckload, our adjusted gross profit per transaction indeclined bothmodestly, truckloadas andwe lessworked than truckload (“LTL”) services, driven by the continued advancement ofwith our dynamic pricing and costing capabilities. These capabilities enabled uscustomers to respond faster and more surgically to meethonor our contractual commitments andwhile adaptactively quicklyrepricing contractual rates to reflect the changing market dynamics and also capture higher-margin opportunities in the spot market. Our combined North American Surface Transportation (“"NAST”") truckload and LTL volume heldincreased flatapproximately 1.5 percent year-over-year in the firstsecond quarter of 2026, significantly outperforming the Cass Freight Index, which declined 6.23.3 percent compared to the firstsecond quarter of 2025.

Added

Our global forwarding results in the second quarter of 2026 were largely in-line with the market trends discussed above. Our ocean freight shipments increased 1.0 percent compared to the second quarter of 2025, as early onset peak-season demand and customer front-loading of holiday and retail inventory supported volumes, even as carrier blank sailings and the continued rerouting of vessels related to Middle East conflicts continued to reduce effective capacity. This modest increase was achieved against a volatile second quarter of 2025 that was heavily impacted by significant policy shifts and changing global tariff rates. Our air freight tonnage decreased 7.5 percent compared to the second quarter of 2025, reflecting a supply-driven contraction in global cargo capacity from Middle East airspace restrictions and reduced carrier operations, which elevated air freight rates and constrained demand during the quarter.

Removed

Our global forwarding results in the first quarter of 2026 were largely in-line with the market trends discussed above. Our year-over-year ocean freight shipments decreased 10.5 percent and our airfreight tonnage decreased 15.0 percent, driven by the accelerated shipping activity ahead of anticipated tariff implementations in the first quarter of 2025.

Removed

On February 1, 2025, we divested our Europe Surface Transportation business, which provided transportation and logistics services, including truckload and LTL transportation services across Europe. This business represented the majority of our Other Surface Transportation operations included in All Other and Corporate.

Reworded

The following summarizes select firstsecond quarter 2026 year-over-year operating comparisons to the firstsecond quarter 2025:

Reworded

•Total revenues decreasedincreased 0.819.3 percent to $4.0$4.9 billion, primarily driven by lower volume in our ocean and truckload services and lower pricing in our ocean services. This was partially offset by higher pricing in our truckloadtruckload, LTL, air, and LTLocean services.

Reworded

•Gross profits decreasedincreased 1.66.8 percent to $646.6$725.9 million. Adjusted gross profits decreasedincreased 1.96.5 percent to $660.5$738.0 million, primarily driven by lower adjusted gross profit per transaction and lower volume in our ocean services. This was partially offset by higher adjusted gross profit per transaction in our LTL and air services and higher volume in our LTL services.

Reworded

•Personnel expenses increased 1.20.9 percent to $352.7$338.5 million, primarily due to higher restructuringincentive chargescompensation relatedreflecting toour workforcestrong reductions.operating performance. This was partially offset by cost optimization efforts and productivity improvements. Average employee headcount decreased 12.310.8 percent.

Reworded

•Other selling, general, and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses decreasedincreased 10.61.2 percent to $132.1$143.8 million primarily due to a prior year impairment charge on our Kansas City regional center lease resulting from the execution of a sublease agreement on a portion of the building. In addition, other SG&A expenses declinedincreases across several expense categories in 2026 due to cost optimization efforts.categories.

Reworded

•Income from operations decreasedincreased 0.718.4 percent to $175.7$255.7 million, due to the decreaseincrease in adjusted gross profit and higher restructuring charges,profit, partially offset by the decreaseincrease in operating expenses.

Reworded

•Interest and other income/expense, net totaled $9.0$17.9 million of expense, consisting primarily of $14.0$16.9 million of interest expense, which decreasedincreased $2.8$0.1 million versus last year due to a lowerhigher average debt balancebalance, andpartially offset by lower variable interest rates. The firstsecond quarter of 2026 results also include a $1.7$1.4 million net gainloss from foreign currency revaluation and realized foreign currency gains and losses.

Added

•The effective tax rate in the quarter was 21.5 percent compared to 21.4 percent in the second quarter last year.

Removed

•The effective tax rate in the quarter was 11.7 percent compared to 13.7 percent in the first quarter last year. The lower rate in the first quarter of 2026 was driven by higher tax benefits related to stock-compensation deliveries, partially offset by non-recurring discrete items and lower U.S. and foreign tax credits and incentives.

Reworded

Consolidated Results of Operations—Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, Compared to the Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025

Added

Total revenues and direct costs. Total transportation revenues and direct costs increased significantly primarily due to higher pricing and costs in our truckload and LTL services, along with higher pricing and costs in our air and ocean services, partially offset by lower air freight tonnage. In our NAST business, tightening market conditions drove higher market pricing across our truckload and LTL services, which was the largest contributor to the year-over-year increase. As discussed in the Market Trends and Business Trends sections, the supply-driven tightening and elevated diesel fuel prices in the market drove all-in transportation rates higher than the prior year. In our global forwarding business, ocean pricing improved as early onset peak-season demand and customer front-loading of holiday and retail inventory supported volumes and rates, even as carrier blank sailings and the continued rerouting of vessels related to Middle East conflicts reduced effective capacity. Air pricing similarly increased, reflecting a supply-driven contraction in effective global capacity and a sharp increase in jet fuel prices from Middle East airspace restrictions and longer flight times and constrained demand during the quarter. Our sourcing total revenues and direct costs increased, due to higher volumes with foodservice customers.

Added

Gross profits and adjusted gross profits. Our transportation adjusted gross profits increased, driven primarily by higher adjusted gross profit per transaction in our LTL and air freight services, as higher adjusted gross profit per transaction from the transactional market was mostly offset by lower adjusted gross profit per transaction in our contractual portfolio within truckload services. The higher adjusted gross profit per transaction in our LTL services reflected stronger demand and favorable pricing dynamics as some customers shifted freight to LTL solutions in response to rising truckload transportation costs. In our truckload services, higher transactional, or spot, market adjusted gross profit per transaction reflected our ability to capture higher-margin opportunities as spot market costs rose, while lower contractual market adjusted gross profit per transaction reflected the sharper acceleration in carrier costs relative to contractual rates, as we worked with our customers to honor our contractual commitments while actively repricing to reflect the changing market conditions. Sourcing adjusted gross profits increased, due to higher volume with foodservice customers.

Removed

Total revenues and direct costs. Total transportation revenues and direct costs decreased primarily due to lower volume in ocean and truckload services and lower pricing in ocean services, partially offset by higher pricing in truckload and LTL services. Our ocean volumes and pricing declined compared to the elevated levels experienced in the first quarter of 2025, which benefited from accelerated shipping activity ahead of anticipated tariff implementations. Pricing has also declined substantially due to excess vessel capacity in the market. In our NAST business, industry volumes continued to decline, while capacity pressures increased as regulatory enforcement activity and higher operating costs accelerated carrier attrition, contributing to higher market pricing. These conditions were exacerbated by winter weather, which created regional capacity constraints. Our sourcing total revenue and direct costs increased, driven by increased volume in foodservice and retail customers.

Removed

Gross profits and adjusted gross profits. Our transportation adjusted gross profits decreased, driven primarily by lower adjusted gross profit per transaction in ocean services and lower volume in ocean and truckload services, as discussed above. These declines were partially offset by higher adjusted gross profit per transaction in our LTL and truckload services. The decrease in ocean adjusted gross profit per transaction was primarily attributable to excess vessel capacity, which significantly reduced pricing across the market. The higher adjusted gross profit per transaction in our LTL and truckload services was driven by the continued advancement of our dynamic pricing and costing capabilities. These capabilities enabled us to respond faster and more surgically to meet our contractual commitments and adapt to rising spot market costs during the first quarter of 2026. Sourcing adjusted gross profits decreased slightly driven by margin compression primarily with retail customers.

Reworded

Operating expenses. Personnel expenses increased primarily due to higher restructuringincentive chargescompensation relatedreflecting toour workforcestrong reductionsoperating performance. This impact was partially offset in part by cost optimization efforts and productivity improvements, including lower average employee headcount. Other SG&A expenses decreasedincreased primarily due to a prior year impairment charge discussed below. In addition, other SG&A expenses declinedincreases across several expense categories in the first quarter of 2026 due to cost optimization efforts.categories.

Reworded

Our personnel expenses in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 included $18.8$8.0 million of severance and related personnel expenses. We alsoexpenses incurred $1.4 million of restructuring related other SG&A expenses in the first quarter of 2026. These expenses were both associatedconnection with our 2025 Restructuring Program. In addition, other SG&A expenses included a net $0.5 million gain driven by the favorable termination of an operating lease, also associated with the program. Refer to Note 13, Restructuring, for further discussion related to our 2025 Restructuring Program.

Reworded

Our personnel expenses for the firstsecond quarter of 2025 included $1.2$3.9 million of severance and related personnel expenses andassociated $1.2with millionour of2025 Restructuring Program. In addition, other SG&A expenses included $0.4 million of expenses resulting from the divestiture of our Europe Surface Transportation business. Refer to Note 14, Divestitures, for further discussion related to the divestiture of our Europe Surface Transportation business. We also incurred $6.3 million of other SG&A expenses in the first quarter of 2025 resulting from an impairment charge on our Kansas City regional center lease resulting from the execution of a sublease agreement on a portion of the building.

Reworded

Interest and other income/expense, net. Interest and other income/expense, net primarily consisted of interest expense of $14.0$16.9 million which decreasedincreased $2.8$0.1 million during the firstsecond quarter of 2026, due to a lowerhigher average debt balancebalance, andpartially offset by lower variable interest rates. The current period included a $1.7 million net gain from foreign currency revaluation and realized foreign currency gains and losses. The first quarter of 2025 included a $3.4$1.4 million net loss from foreign currency revaluation and realized foreign currency gains and losses. The second quarter of 2025 included a $4.9 million net loss from foreign currency revaluation and realized foreign currency gains and losses.

Reworded

Provision for income taxes. Our effective income tax rate was 11.721.5 percent for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to 13.721.4 percent for the firstsecond quarter of 2025. The effective income tax rate for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was lowerhigher than the statutory federal income tax rate primarily due to the impact of share-based payment awards which decreased the effectivestate income tax rateexpense, bynet 21.9of percentagefederal points, partially offset by non-deductible executive compensation expensesbenefit, which increased the effective tax rate by 8.82.1 percentage points and by non-deductible executive compensation expenses, which increased the effective tax rate by 1.5 percentage points. These impacts were partially offset by the tax benefit of share-based payment awards, and foreign tax credits. The effective income tax rate for the firstsecond quarter of 2025 was lowerhigher than the statutory federal income tax rate primarily due to thestate income tax benefitexpense, net of share-basedfederal paymentbenefit, awards,which aincreased lowerthe effective tax rate onby 2.3 percentage points. This impact was partially offset by foreign earnings and U.S. tax credits and incentives which decreased the effective income tax rate by 6.11.9 percentage points,points 2.7during percentagethe points,second andquarter 1.6of percentage points, respectively.2025.

Added

Consolidated Results of Operations—Six Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025

Added

Total revenues and direct costs. Total revenues and direct costs increased primarily due to higher pricing and costs in our truckload and LTL services and higher pricing in our air freight services, partially offset by lower volumes in truckload, ocean, and air freight. In our NAST business, tightening market conditions drove higher market pricing and costs across our truckload and LTL services. The supply-side market tightening that emerged in late 2025 and continued into 2026, along with elevated diesel fuel prices, drove all-in transportation rates higher than the prior year. In our global forwarding business, air freight pricing and costs increased, reflecting a contraction in effective global capacity from Middle East conflicts, which drove airspace restrictions and longer flight times along with a sharp increase in jet fuel prices. Ocean pricing and costs increased later in the period as early onset peak-season demand and customer front-loading of holiday and retail inventory supported rates, even as carrier blank sailings and the continued rerouting of vessels related to those same conflicts reduced effective capacity. Our sourcing total revenues and direct costs increased primarily due to higher volumes with retail and foodservice customers.

Added

Gross profits and adjusted gross profits. Our transportation adjusted gross profits increased, driven primarily by higher adjusted gross profit per transaction in our LTL and air services, partially offset by lower volume in our truckload, ocean, and air freight services. The higher adjusted gross profit per transaction in our LTL services was driven primarily by stronger demand and favorable pricing dynamics as some customers shifted freight to LTL solutions in response to rising truckload transportation costs. Our adjusted gross profits in truckload services decreased reflecting a decline in volumes as higher adjusted gross profit per transaction from the transactional market was mostly offset by lower adjusted gross profit per transaction in our contractual portfolio. Sourcing adjusted gross profits increased due to higher volumes with foodservice customers, partially offset by margin compression, primarily with retail customers.

Added

Operating expenses. Personnel expenses increased primarily due to higher restructuring charges related to workforce reductions. These increases were partially offset by cost optimization initiatives and productivity improvements, including a lower average employee headcount. Other SG&A expenses decreased primarily due to lower occupancy costs and reductions across several expense categories. The decline in occupancy costs was driven by a $6.3 million impairment charge related to our Kansas City regional center recorded in the prior-year period, together with ongoing facilities footprint optimization efforts.

Added

Our personnel expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2026 included $26.8 million of severance and related personnel expenses incurred in connection with our 2025 Restructuring Program. In addition, other SG&A included $0.9 million of expense also associated with the program. Refer to Note 13, Restructuring, for further discussion related to our 2025 Restructuring Program.

Added

Our personnel expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2025 included $5.1 million of severance and related personnel expenses incurred in connection with our 2025 Restructuring Program and the divestiture of our Europe Surface Transportation business. In addition, other SG&A included $7.8 million of expense also associated with the divestiture and the Kansas City regional center impairment discussed above.

Added

Interest and other income/expense, net. Interest and other income/expense, net primarily consisted of interest expense of $30.9 million, which decreased $2.7 million driven by lower variable interest rates and a lower average debt balance compared to the prior year. The six months ended June 30, 2026 included a $0.3 million net gain from foreign currency revaluation and realized foreign currency gains and losses, compared to an $8.3 million net loss in the prior year.

Added

Provision for income taxes. Our effective income tax rate was 17.4 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 17.9 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was lower than the statutory federal income tax rate primarily due to the tax benefit of share-based payment awards and foreign tax credits, which decreased the effective tax rate by 9.1 percentage points and 1.1 percentage points, respectively. These impacts were partially offset by non-deductible executive compensation expenses and state income tax expense, net of federal benefit, which increased the effective tax rate by 3.6 percentage points and 2.3 percentage points, respectively. The effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2025 was lower than the statutory federal income tax rate primarily due to the tax benefit of share-based payment awards, foreign tax credits, and U.S. tax credits and incentives, which decreased the effective tax rate by 2.9 percentage points, 1.9 percentage points, and 1.6 percentage points, respectively. These impacts were partially offset by state income tax expense, net of federal benefit which increased the effective tax rate by 2.2 percentage points.

Reworded

Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, Compared to the Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025

Reworded

Total revenues and direct costs. NAST total revenues and direct costs increased significantly primarily due to higher market pricing and costs in our truckload and LTL services, including higher fuel surcharges,surcharges. andTightening increasedmarket LTLconditions volumes.drove These increases were partially offset by lower truckload volumes. Elevatedhigher market pricing wasacross drivenour by supply‑side pressures, including increased regulatory enforcement activitytruckload and increasingLTL carrier operating costs,services, which acceleratedwas carrierthe attritionlargest contributor to the year-over-year increase, with volumes also increasing in both truckload and resultedLTL services. As discussed in higherthe Market Trends and Business Trends sections, the supply-driven tightening and elevated diesel fuel prices in the market drove all-in transportation rates.rates higher than the prior year. Our average truckload linehaul rate per mile charged to customers, which excludes fuel surcharges, increased approximately 11.025.5 percent in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to the firstsecond quarter of 2025. Our truckload linehaul cost per mile, excluding fuel surcharges, increased approximately 13.029.0 percent in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to the firstsecond quarter of 2025.

Added

Gross profits and adjusted gross profits. NAST adjusted gross profits increased, driven primarily by higher adjusted gross profit per transaction in our LTL services, as higher adjusted gross profit per transaction from the transactional market was mostly offset by lower adjusted gross profit per transaction in our contractual portfolio within truckload services. The higher adjusted gross profit per transaction in our LTL services reflected stronger demand and favorable pricing dynamics as some customers shifted freight to LTL solutions in response to rising truckload transportation costs. In our truckload services, higher transactional, or spot, market adjusted gross profit per transaction reflected our ability to capture higher-margin opportunities as spot market costs rose, while lower contractual market adjusted gross profit per transaction reflected the sharper acceleration in carrier costs relative to our contractual rates, as we worked with our customers to honor our contractual commitments while actively repricing to reflect the changing market conditions.

Removed

Gross profits and adjusted gross profits. NAST adjusted gross profits increased primarily due to higher adjusted gross profit per transaction in truckload and LTL services and increased LTL volumes. These increases were partially offset by lower truckload volumes. The increase in adjusted gross profit per transaction in truckload and LTL services reflects the continued advancement of our dynamic pricing and costing capabilities. These capabilities enabled us to respond faster and more surgically to meet our contractual commitments and adapt to rising spot market costs during the first quarter of 2026.

Reworded

Operating expenses. NAST personnel expenses increased primarily due to higher restructuringincentive chargescompensation relatedreflecting toour workforcestrong reductionsoperating performance. This impact was partially offset in part by cost optimization efforts and productivity improvements, including lower average employee headcount. NAST other SG&A expenses decreasedincreased primarily due to lowerhigher claims expense and higher allocated corporate expenses partially offset by declines across several expense categories.

Reworded

NAST personnel expenses in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 included $16.0$2.0 million of severance and related personnel expenses relatedassociated towith our 2025 Restructuring Program. Other SG&A expenses also included $0.1 million of restructuring costs. NAST personnel expenses in the second quarter of 2025 included $0.7 million of severance and related personnel expenses also associated with the same program. Refer to Note 13, Restructuring, for further discussion related to our 2025 Restructuring Program.

Added

Six Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025

Added

Total revenues and direct costs. NAST total revenues and direct costs increased significantly primarily due to higher market pricing and costs in our truckload and LTL services, including higher fuel surcharges. Tightening market conditions drove higher market pricing across our truckload and LTL services. This supply-driven tightening, which emerged in late 2025 and continued into 2026, together with elevated diesel fuel prices, drove all-in transportation rates higher than the prior year. LTL volumes increased for the year-to-date period, while truckload volumes decreased, reflecting a decline in the first quarter that was only partially offset by modest growth in the second quarter. Our average truckload linehaul rate per mile charged to customers, which excludes fuel surcharges, increased approximately 18.5 percent. Our truckload linehaul cost per mile, excluding fuel surcharges, increased approximately 21.5 percent.

Added

Gross profits and adjusted gross profits. NAST adjusted gross profits increased, driven primarily by higher adjusted gross profit per transaction in our LTL services. The higher adjusted gross profit per transaction in our LTL services reflected stronger demand and favorable pricing dynamics as some customers shifted freight to LTL solutions in response to rising truckload transportation costs, along with increased LTL volumes. Adjusted gross profits in our truckload services decreased, reflecting a decline in volumes, as higher adjusted gross profit per transaction from the transactional, or spot, market was mostly offset by lower adjusted gross profit per transaction in our contractual portfolio. The higher transactional market adjusted gross profit per transaction reflected our ability to capture higher-margin opportunities as spot market costs rose, while the lower contractual market adjusted gross profit per transaction reflected the sharper acceleration in carrier costs relative to our contractual rates, as we worked with our customers to honor our contractual commitments while actively repricing to reflect the changing market conditions.

Added

Operating expenses. NAST personnel expenses increased driven by higher restructuring charges related to workforce reductions and higher incentive compensation reflecting our strong operating performance. These increases were partially offset by cost optimization efforts and productivity improvements, including lower average employee headcount. NAST other SG&A expenses increased primarily due to higher allocated corporate expenses and higher claims expense.

Added

NAST personnel expenses in the six months ended June 30, 2026 included $18.1 million of severance and related personnel expenses associated with our 2025 Restructuring Program. Other SG&A expenses also included $0.2 million of restructuring costs. NAST personnel expenses in the six months ended June 30, 2025 included $0.7 million of severance and related personnel expenses also associated with the same program.

Reworded

Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, Compared to the Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025

Added

Total revenues and direct costs. Global Forwarding total revenues and direct costs increased primarily driven by higher pricing and costs in air services, including the impact of higher fuel surcharges, along with higher pricing and costs in ocean services, and to a lesser extent, an increase in ocean volumes. These increases were partially offset by lower air freight tonnage. Air pricing increased, reflecting a supply-driven contraction in effective global capacity and a sharp increase in jet fuel prices resulting from Middle East airspace restrictions and longer flight routings, along with constrained demand during the quarter. Ocean pricing increased as the early onset of peak-season demand and customer front-loading of holiday and retail inventory supported volumes and rates, even as carrier blank sailings and the continued rerouting of Asia-to-Europe vessels related to Middle East conflicts reduced effective capacity.

Added

Gross profits and adjusted gross profits. Global Forwarding adjusted gross profits increased, primarily driven by a higher adjusted gross profit per shipment in air services, attributable to the elevated global air freight pricing discussed above. This increase was partially offset by lower adjusted gross profits in ocean and customs services. Ocean adjusted gross profits declined, driven by a lower adjusted gross profit per shipment as purchased transportation costs increased faster than customer pricing, partially offset by higher volumes, as discussed above. Customs adjusted gross profits decreased compared to the elevated levels in the prior year, which benefited from higher duty advance fees reflecting elevated global tariff rates.

Removed

Total revenues and direct costs. Global Forwarding total revenues and direct costs decreased significantly in the first quarter of 2026, primarily driven by lower volumes across all services and significantly lower pricing and purchased transportation costs in ocean services. Ocean volumes and pricing declined from the elevated levels experienced in the first quarter of 2025, which benefited from accelerated shipping activity ahead of anticipated tariff implementations. Pricing also declined substantially due to excess vessel capacity in the market, despite conflict-related rerouting, elevated fuel costs, and carriers’ strategic capacity management actions, including blank sailings.

Removed

Gross profits and adjusted gross profits. Global Forwarding adjusted gross profits decreased in the first quarter of 2026 primarily driven by significantly lower adjusted gross profit per shipment in ocean services and reduced volumes across all services, as discussed above. These declines were partially offset by an increase in customs adjusted gross profit per transaction. The decrease in adjusted gross profit per shipment in ocean services was primarily attributable to excess vessel capacity, which significantly reduced pricing across the market.

Reworded

Operating expenses. Personnel expenses decreased driven by cost optimization efforts and productivity improvements including lower average employee headcount and lower incentive compensation expense. Global Forwarding other SG&A expenses decreasedincreased primarily due to declineshigher acrossallocated severalcorporate expense categories.expenses.

Reworded

InGlobal additionForwarding topersonnel expenses in the above,second quarter of 2026 included $3.0 million of severance and related personnel expenses associated with our 2025 Restructuring Program. Other SG&A expenses included a $0.8 million gain resulting from the favorable termination of an operating lease also associated with the program. Global Forwarding personnel expenses for the firstsecond quarter of 20262025 included $1.1$2.6 million of severance and related personnel expenses. Weexpenses also incurred $1.4 million in other SG&A expenses the first quarter of 2026. These expenses were both associated with ourthe 2025same Restructuring Program.program. Refer to Note 13, Restructuring, for further discussion related to our 2025 Restructuring Program.

Added

Six Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025

Added

Total revenues and direct costs. Global Forwarding total revenues decreased, primarily driven by lower volumes in both ocean and air freight services and, to a lesser extent, lower pricing in ocean services. These decreases were mostly offset by higher pricing in air services, including the impact of higher fuel surcharges. The higher pricing in the air freight market also contributed to an increase in purchased transportation costs compared to the prior year. Ocean and air freight volumes declined from the elevated levels experienced in the first half of 2025, which benefited from accelerated shipping activity ahead of anticipated tariff implementations. Ocean pricing was pressured early in the period by excess vessel capacity in the market, before strengthening later in the period as the early onset of peak‑season demand and customer front‑loading of holiday and retail inventory supported volumes and rates, even as carrier blank sailings and the continued rerouting of Asia‑to‑Europe vessels related to Middle East conflicts reduced effective capacity. Air freight pricing increased, reflecting a supply‑driven contraction in effective global capacity and a sharp increase in jet fuel prices resulting from Middle East airspace restrictions and longer flight routings, even as air freight tonnage declined amid constrained demand.

Added

Gross profits and adjusted gross profits. Global Forwarding adjusted gross profits decreased, primarily driven by a lower adjusted gross profit per shipment in ocean services and lower ocean volumes. The decline in ocean adjusted gross profit per shipment was attributable to excess vessel capacity that significantly reduced pricing earlier in the period, and, later in the period, to purchased transportation costs increasing faster than customer pricing. These declines were partially offset by a higher adjusted gross profit per shipment in air services, attributable to the elevated global air freight pricing discussed above, partially offset by lower air freight volumes.

Showing the first 60 of 78 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

CHRW insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2026-07-08Lee Damon J.
Chief Financial Officer
Shares withheld for tax 4,698$190.95 $897.1K36,736 SEC
2026-06-26Bozeman David P
Director, President & CEO
Shares withheld for tax 11,693$180.34 $2.1M178,978 SEC
2026-05-29Rajan Arun
Chief Strat & Innov Officer
Grant/award 8,714— —133,340 SEC
2026-05-05Capers Dorothy Trefon
Chief Legal Officer
Shares withheld for tax 1,204$161.24 $194.1K19,360 SEC

Well-known investors holding CHRW (13F)

None of the 59 investors we track reported a position in their latest 13F.

Coming soon: email alerts when CHRW files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.