CLDI 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc. (also CLDWW) · NYSE · Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances) · CIK 1855485 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Disruptions at the FDA and other governmental agencies and regulatory authorities could negatively affect the review of our regulatory submissions or impact our ability to access the public markets, which could negatively impact our business.”
Removed heading “We may incur significant cash payment obligations under our in-licensing agreements with Northwestern University and City of Hope.”
Removed heading “Mr. Camaisa, an officer and director, and Mr. Leftwich, a director, and their respective affiliates own a significant percentage of our common stock and have significant influence over our management.”
Largest changes
“As of December 31, 2025, we had approximately $5.6 million in cash, accumulated deficit of approximately $141.6 million and working capital of approximately $2.3 million. We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2025, and our anticipated expenditures and commitments for the next twelve months, will not enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements for the twelve months from December 31, 2025. These conditions give rise to substantial doubt over the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. …”see in full comparison
“As of December 31, 2024, we had approximately $9.6 million in cash, accumulated deficit of approximately $121.7 million and working capital of approximately $0.7 million. We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2024, and our anticipated expenditures and commitments for the next twelve months, will not enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements for the twelve months from December 31, 2024. These conditions give rise to substantial doubt over the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. …”see in full comparison
“Disruptions at the FDA and other governmental agencies and regulatory authorities could negatively affect the review of our regulatory submissions or impact our ability to access the public markets, which could negatively impact our business.”see in full comparison
“Mr. Camaisa, an officer and director, and Mr. Leftwich, a director, and their respective affiliates own a significant percentage of our common stock and have significant influence over our management.”see in full comparison
“We may incur significant cash payment obligations under our in-licensing agreements with Northwestern University and City of Hope.”see in full comparison
“The ability of the FDA and other regulatory authorities to review and approve regulatory submissions can be affected by a variety of factors, including statutory, regulatory and policy changes, inadequate government budget funding levels, their ability to accept user fees, or a reduction in the FDA’s workforce and its ability to hire and retain key personnel, disruptions caused by government shutdowns and public health crises. There have been mass layoffs of federal government employees since the start of the Trump Administration in January 2025, the full impact of which remains unclear. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (63)
We
are ana immuno-oncologybiotechnology company with a limited operating history and have not generated any revenue to date from product
sales.
As of December 31, 2025, we had approximately $5.6 million in cash, accumulated deficit of approximately $141.6 million and working capital of approximately $2.3 million. We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2025, and our anticipated expenditures and commitments for the next twelve months, will not enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements for the twelve months from December 31, 2025. These conditions give rise to substantial doubt over the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. We will need to raise additional capital to support our operations and execute our business plan. We will be required to pursue sources of additional capital through various means, including debt or equity financings. Newly issued securities may include preferences, superior voting rights, and the issuance of warrants or other convertible securities that will have additional dilutive effects. Further, the sale of or the perception of the sale of a substantial number of our common stock by selling securityholders pursuant to a registration statement filed with the SEC will adversely affect the price of our common stock due to our limited trading volume. In addition, the sale of a substantial number of our common stock by such selling securityholders will adversely affect the share price that we may obtain in future financings and may adversely affect our ability to conduct and complete future financings. We cannot assure that additional funds will be available when needed from any source or, if available, will be available on terms that are acceptable to us and may cause existing shareholders both book value and ownership dilution. Further, we may incur substantial costs in pursuing future capital and/or financing, including investment banking fees, legal fees, accounting fees, printing and distribution expenses and other costs. We may also be required to recognize non-cash expenses in connection with certain securities we may issue, such as convertible notes and warrants, which will adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations. Our ability to obtain needed financing may be impaired by such factors as the weakness of capital markets, and the fact that we have not been profitable, which could impact the availability and cost of future financings. If the amount of capital we are able to raise from financing activities is not sufficient to satisfy our capital needs, we may have to reduce our operations accordingly.
●
successfully complete our ongoing and planned preclinical studies and clinical trials for our allogeneicproduct stem cell delivery of on oncolytic
virus programscandidates;
●
timely file and receive acceptance of our Investigational New Drug applications,applications or INDs,(“INDs”), in order to commence our planned clinical trials
or future clinical trials;
●
successfully enroll subjects in, and complete, clinical trials for our oncolyticproduct viral allogeneic stem cell programscandidates;
Our
enveloped vaccina virus and engineered allogeneic stem cell and enveloped vaccina virus product candidates represent a novel
approach to cancer treatment that creates
significant challenges.
We
are developing a pipeline of enveloped vaccina virus and allogeneic stem cell product candidates engineered from healthy donor
adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells
and enveloped vaccina virus to potentiate and deliver oncolytic viruses to the tumor site and
are intended for use in any patient with
certain cancers. Advancing these novel product candidates creates significant challenges
for us, including:
●
obtaining regulatory approval, as the FDA and other regulatory authorities have limited experience with the development and regulation
of enveloped vaccina virus and allogeneic stem cell and enveloped vaccina virus therapies for cancer; and
The
development of biopharmaceutical products is capital intensive. We are currently advancing our product candidates through
pre-clinical pre-clinical
testing and clinical development across a number of potential indications. We have in-licensed our lead product candidate
CLD-101 for
newly diagnosed high grade glioma (“HGG”) that has completed a Phase 1 clinical trial sponsored by
Northwestern University.
We intend to initiate a Phase 1b or Phase 2 clinical trial under our in-licensed IND for CLD-101 for patients with newly diagnosed HGG.
Our second program using our SuperNova™ technology has completed a limited physician
investigator-sponsored pre-IND open-label,
nonrandomized dose-escalation study prospectively reviewed by the International Cell
Surgical Society Institutional Review Board. This
study involved a TK-positive oncolytic vaccinia virus delivered by autologous
adipose stromal vascular fraction stem cells and was completed
in 2018. Since the completion of the study, the FDA has asserted that
in-human studies involving autologous adipose stromal vascular
fraction stem cells are regulated under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetics Act and require an IND from the FDA in order to conduct
clinical trials. We intendhave to apply for anreceived IND approval from
the FDA andto initiate a Phase 1 clinical trial for our product candidate CLD-201 that
utilizes allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal
stem cell (“AD-MSC”) line VP-001 loaded with tumor selective “CAL1”
oncolytic vaccinia virus strain. Our
third program involves significant preclinical research involving enveloping vaccinia virus within
a cellular membrane.membrane is in IND-enabling studies.
Consequently, we expect our expenses to significantly increase in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly
as we
continue our pre-clinical studies and initiate our planned clinical trials or initiate future trials on other product candidates and
and pursue the research and development of, and seek marketing approval for, our product candidates. In addition, depending on the
status status
of regulatory approvals or, if we obtain marketing approval for any of our product candidates, we expect to incur significant
commercialization commercialization
expenses related to product sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution. We may also need to raise additional
funds sooner if we
choose to pursue additional indications and/or geographies for our product candidates or otherwise expand more
rapidly than we presently
anticipate. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we would be forced to
delay, reduce or eliminate certain
of our research and development programs or future commercialization efforts, and may be unable
to expand our operations or otherwise
capitalize on our business opportunities, as desired, which could materially affect our
business, financial condition and results of
operations.
●
the scope, progress, results and costs of product discovery, preclinical and clinical development, laboratory testing and clinical trials
for the development of CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, and CLD-400 or our other potential product
candidates;
●
the timing of, and the costs involved in, obtaining marketing approvals for CLD-101our inproduct newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG
as well as for CLD-201 and CLD-400candidates in our initial target indications and our other potential product candidates that we may develop;
●
if approved, the costs of commercialization activities for CLD-101our forproduct newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG or CLD-201candidates for
any approved indications or any other product candidate that receives regulatory approval to the extent such costs are not the responsibility
of a collaborator that we may contract with in the future, including the costs and timing of establishing product sales, marketing, distribution
and manufacturing capabilities;
We
may incur significant cash payment obligations under our in-licensing agreements with Northwestern University and City of Hope.
We
have entered into certain agreements with Northwestern and City of Hope, in which we are committed to pay up to $10 million in clinical
trial costs for CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGG and CLD-101 for recurrent HGG. Furthermore, we have agreed to pay contingent consideration
of up to $18.7 million if certain development milestones related to CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGG and CLD-101 for recurrent HGG are
achieved.
To
meet these various cash payment obligations, we may need to sell additional shares of our common stock or other securities or issue debt
to raise the required cash, or we may have to divert cash on hand that we would otherwise use for other business and operational purposes,
which could cause us to delay or reduce activities in the development and commercialization of our programs and which may have a material
adverse effect on our business, operating results and prospects.
Our
business is highly dependent on the success of CLD-101our forRedTail newlyproduct diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, and CLD-400.candidates. If we
are unable to obtain approval for CLD-101our forRedTail newlyproduct diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201 and/or CLD-400candidates and effectively
commercialize any of these product candidatesthem for the treatment of patients in its approved indications, our business would be significantly
harmed.
Our
business and future success depend on our ability to obtain regulatory approval of, and then successfully commercialize, our most advancedRedTail
product candidate,candidates. CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGG. CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGGCLD-401 is in the early stages of development and has only
not been administered toon ahuman limited number of patients in a Phase 1 physician-sponsored clinical trial.patients. The preclinical
results to date may not predict
outcomes for our planned clinical trial or any future studies of CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGGCLD-401 or
any otherenveloped allogeneic neural stem cellvirus product
candidate. Because CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGGCLD-401 is the first allogeneicenveloped virus product to
be evaluatedin inpre IND studies for the clinic, its failure, or the
failure of other allogeneicenveloped neural stem cellvirus therapies, may significantly influence
physicians’ and regulators’ opinions
regarding the viability of our entire pipelineRedTail of allogeneic neural stem cell therapies. We are also dependent on Northwestern University
to conduct an additional non-pivotal CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGG Phase 1 trial in a timely and appropriate manner so that we can
sponsor the pivotal Phase 2 trial for CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGG. If Northwestern University does not conduct the trial on the timeline
we expect, or otherwise fails to support the trial, our leadership position in the allogeneic neural stem cell industry and ability to
progress additional product candidates may be significantly harmed.platform.
Our
product candidates, including CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-201 and CLD-101 for recurrent HGG,candidates will require additional clinical
and non-clinical development, regulatory review and approval in multiple
jurisdictions, a substantial investment, access to sufficient
commercial manufacturing capacity and significant marketing efforts
before we can generate any revenue from product sales. In addition,
because CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGGCLD-401 is our most advanced product candidate from the
RedTail platform and our other developing product candidates are based on similar
technology, if CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGGCLD-401 encounters safety or efficacy problems, manufacturing problems, developmental delays,
regulatory issues, or other problems, our
development plans and business would be significantly harmed.
Before
obtaining regulatory approvals for the commercial sale of our product candidates, including CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101
for recurrent HGG, CLD-201 or CLD-400 or any other product candidates we develop, we must demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our
product candidates for use in each target indication through lengthy, complex, and expensive preclinical studies and clinical
trials. trials.
Failure can occur at any time during the preclinical study and clinical trial processes and there is a high risk of failure,
so we may
never succeed in developing marketable products. Any preclinical studies or clinical trials that we may conduct may not
demonstrate the
safety and efficacy necessary to obtain regulatory approval to market any of our product candidates. If the results
of our ongoing or
future preclinical studies and clinical trials are inconclusive with respect to the safety and efficacy of our
product candidates, if
we do not meet the clinical endpoints with statistical and clinically meaningful significance, or if there
are safety concerns associated
with our product candidates, we may be prevented or delayed in obtaining marketing approval for such
product candidates. In some instances,
there can be significant variability in safety or efficacy results between different
preclinical studies and clinical trials of the same
product candidate due to numerous factors, including changes in trial procedures
set forth in protocols, differences in the size and
type of the patient populations, changes in and adherence to the clinical trial
protocols and the rate of dropout among clinical trial
participants. While we are currently planning for either a physician-sponsored Phase 1b or a company-sponsored Phase 2 clinical trial
for CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGG and are in early stages of clinical development for CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, or CLD-400
it is likely, as is the case with many oncology therapies, that there may be side effects associated with their use.
From
time to time, we may publish interim, top line or preliminary data from our clinical trials. We may decide to conduct an interim analysis
of the data after a certain number or percentage of patients have been enrolled, or after only a part of the full follow-up period but
before completion of the trial. Similarly, we may report top line or preliminary results of primary and key secondary endpoints before
the final trial results are completed. Preliminary, top line and interim data from our clinical trials may change as more patient data
or analyses become available. Preliminary, top line or interim data from our clinical trials are not necessarily predictive of final
results and are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollmentenrolment continues, more
more patient data become available and we issue our final clinical trial report. TheseThe data also remainremains subject to audit and verification
procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the preliminary data we previously published. As a result,
preliminary, interim and top line data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. Material adverse changes in
the final data compared to the interim data could significantly harm our business prospects.
Additionally,
some of past, ongoing and planned clinical trials utilize andan “open-label” study design. An “open-label” clinical
trial is one where both the patient and investigator know whether the patient is receiving the investigational product candidate or either
an existing approved drug or placebo. Most typically, open-label clinical trials test only the investigational product candidate and
sometimes may do so at different dose levels. Open-label clinical trials are subject to various limitations that may exaggerate any therapeutic
effect, as patients in open-label clinical trials are aware when they are receiving treatment. Open-label clinical trials may be subject
to a “patient bias” where patients perceive their symptoms to have improved merely due to their awareness of receiving an
experimental treatment. Moreover, patients selected for early clinical studies often include the most severe sufferers and their symptoms
may have improved notwithstanding the new treatment. In addition, open-label clinical trials may be subject to an “investigator
bias” where those assessing and reviewing the physiological outcomes of the clinical trials are aware of which patients have received
treatment and may interpret the information of the treated group more favorably given this knowledge.
Our
product candidates are based on a novel approach to the treatment of cancer using vaccinia virus enveloped in a cellular membrane,
allogeneic neural stem cell, and allogeneic adipose-derived
mesenchymal stem cell (“AD-MSC”) loaded with an oncolytic virus, and vaccinia
virus envelopedwhich in a cellular membrane which
makes it difficult to predict the time and cost of product
candidate development and subsequently obtaining regulatory approval, if at
all.
We
have concentrated all of our research and development efforts on our CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-201, and CLD-400 product candidates,
and our future success depends on the successful
development of these therapeutic approaches. In particular, CLD-101 for newly diagnosed
HGG utilizes NSC-CRAd-S-pk7, an engineered oncolytic
adenovirus delivered by neural stem cells to activate the innate and adaptive immune
system. To our knowledge, there are no FDA-approved
products for the treatment of cancer that utilize the adenovirus.
We
expect the novel nature of our product candidates using allogeneic neural stem cells and allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem
cells (“AD-MSC”) to create significant challenges in obtaining regulatory approval. Few viral immunotherapies have been approved
globally or by the FDA to date. While the first viral immunotherapy, talimogene laherparepvec (Imlygic, Amgen), has received FDA approval,
regulatory agencies have reviewed relatively few viral immunotherapy product candidates such as CLD-101our forproduct newly diagnosed HGG and CLD-201.candidates.
This may lengthen the regulatory review process, increase our development costs and delay or prevent commercialization of our product
candidates. Further, any viral immunotherapies that are approved may be subject to extensive post-approval regulatory requirements, including
requirements pertaining to manufacturing, distribution and promotion. We may need to devote significant time and resources to compliance
with these requirements.
Furthermore,
there has been limited historical clinical trial experience for the development of products that utilize the adenovirus. Moreover,
the the
design and conduct of our clinical trials utilizing vaccinia virus enveloped in a cellular membrane and both neural stem cells
and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (“AD-MSC”)
and vaccinia virus enveloped in a cellular membrane to deliver
oncolytic viruses differs from the design and conduct of previously conducted
clinical trials in this area. As a result, there is
substantial risk that the design or outcomes of our clinical trials will not be satisfactory
to support marketing
approval.
The
commercial success of adenovirus we use in our CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGG and CLD-101 for recurrent HGG product candidates or ACAM2000,
a thymidine kinase (TK)-positive strain of
vaccinia virus (used as the current smallpox vaccine in the United States) we anticipateare using
in our CLD-401 and CLD-201 product candidate, and the vaccinia virus we intend to utilize in CLD-400
candidates, will depend in part on public acceptance of
the use of
immuno-oncology, and, in particular, oncolytic viral immunotherapy. Adverse events in clinical trials of CLD-101our forcurrent newly
diagnosedproduct HGG, CLD-201 or any other adenovirus or any other ACAM2000-basedcandidates or vaccinia virus based product candidates which we may develop, or
or in clinical trials of others developing similar products and the resulting publicity, as well as any other negative developments in
the field of immuno-oncology that may occur in the future, including in connection with competitor therapies, could result in a
decrease decrease
in demand for any adenovirus-, vaccinia virus or ACAM2000-based product candidates that we may develop. These events could
also result
in the suspension, discontinuation, or clinical hold of or modification to our clinical trials. If public perception is
influenced by
claims that the use of oncolytic immunotherapies is unsafe, whether related to our therapies or those of our
competitors, our product
candidates may not be accepted by the general public or the medical community and potential clinical trial
subjects may be discouraged
from enrolling in our clinical trials. In addition, responses by national or state governments to
negative public perception may result
in new legislation or regulations that could limit our ability to develop or commercialize any
product candidates, obtain or maintain
regulatory approval or otherwise achieve profitability. More restrictive statutory regimes,
government regulations or negative public
opinion would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, prospects and
results of operations and may delay or impair
the development and commercialization of our product candidates or demand for any
products we may develop. As a result, we may not be
able to continue or may be delayed in conducting our development
programs.
Identifying
and qualifying patients to participate in clinical trials of our product candidates is critical to our success. The timing of completion
of our clinical trials depends in part on the speed at which we can recruit patients to participate in testing our product candidates,
and we may experience delays in our clinical trials if we encounter difficulties in enrollment.enrolment. We may not be able to initiate or continue
clinical trials for our product candidates if we are unable to locate and enroll a sufficient number of eligible patients to participate
in these trials as required by the FDA or other regulatory authorities, or as needed to provide appropriate statistical power for a given
trial. In particular, because we are focused on patients with brain cancer for the development of CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGG and
CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, our ability to enroll eligible patients may be limited or enrollmentenrolment may be slower than we anticipate due to
to the small eligible patient population.
The
enrollmentenrolment of patients further depends on many factors, including:
The
development and commercialization of new product candidates is highly competitive. We face competition from major pharmaceutical, specialty
pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies among others with respect to CLD-101our forproduct newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201
and CLD-400candidates and will face similar competition with respect to any product candidates that we may seek to develop or commercialize in
the future. We compete in pharmaceutical, biotechnology and other related markets that develop immuno-oncology therapies for the treatment
of cancer. There are other companies working to develop viral immunotherapies for the treatment of cancer, including divisions of large
pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies of various sizes. The large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies that have commercialized
and/or are developing immuno-oncology treatments for cancer include AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Merck, Novartis,
Pfizer and Roche/Genentech.
The
regulatory approval processes of the FDA and other regulatory authorities are lengthy, time consuming and inherently unpredictable. If
we are not able to obtain, or experience delays in obtaining, required regulatory approvals, we will not be able to commercialize CLD-101
forour newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, CLD-400current and future product candidates as expected, and our ability to generate
revenue may be materially impaired.
The
time required to obtain approval by the FDA and other regulatory authorities is unpredictable, but typically takes many years following
the commencement of clinical trials and depends upon numerous factors, including the substantial discretion of the regulatory authorities.
In addition, approval policies, regulations, or the type and amount of clinical data necessary to gain approval may change during the
course of a product candidate’s clinical development and may vary among jurisdictions. These regulatory requirements may require
us to amend our clinical trial protocols, including to comply with the protocols of any applicable Special Protocol Assessment (“SPA”)
we receive from the FDA; conduct additional preclinical studies or clinical trials that may require regulatory or independent institutional
review board, or IRB, approval; or otherwise cause delays in obtaining approval or rejection of an application. Any delay in obtaining
or failure to obtain required approvals could materially adversely affect our ability to generate revenue from the particular product
candidate, which may materially harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, stock price and prospects. Regulatory
authorities have substantial discretion in the approval process and may refuse to accept any application or may decide that our data
are insufficient for approval and require additional preclinical, clinical or other studies. In addition, varying interpretations of
the data obtained from preclinical and clinical testing could delay, limit or prevent marketing approval of a product candidate. The
number and types of preclinical studies and clinical trials that will be required for regulatory approval also varies depending on the
product candidate, the disease or condition that the product candidate is designed to address, and the regulations applicable to any
particular product candidate. Approval policies, regulations or the type and amount of clinical data necessary to gain approval may change
during the course of a product candidate’s clinical development and may vary among jurisdictions, and there may be varying interpretations
of data obtained from preclinical studies or clinical trials, any of which may cause delays or limitations in the approval or a decision
not to approve an application. It is possible that CLD-101our for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, CLD-400current and future
product candidates will never obtain the appropriate regulatory approvals necessary for us to commence product sales.
Undesirable
side effects caused by CLD-101our for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201current or any future product candidates could also
result in denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or other regulatory authorities for any or all targeted indications or the inclusion
of unfavorable information in our product labeling, such as limitations on the indicated uses for which the products may be marketed
or distributed, a label with significant safety warnings, including boxed warnings, contraindications, and precautions, a label without
statements necessary or desirable for successful commercialization, or may result in requirements for costly post-marketing testing and
surveillance, or other requirements, including REMS, to monitor the safety or efficacy of the products, and in turn prevent us from commercializing
and generating revenues from the sale of CLD-101our for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, CLD-400current and future product
candidates. Any such limitations or restrictions could similarly impact any supplemental marketing approvals we may obtain for CLD-101
forour newlyproduct diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG and CLD-201.candidates. Undesirable side effects may limit the potential market for any approved
products or could result in restrictions on manufacturing processes, the discontinuation of the sales and marketing of the product, or
withdrawal of product approvals. We could also be sued and held liable for harm caused to patients, or become subject to fines, injunctions
or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties.
If
CLD-101our for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, CLD-400current and future product candidates are associated with serious
adverse events or undesirable side effects or have properties that are unexpected, we may need to abandon development or limit development
of that product candidate to certain uses or subpopulations in which the undesirable side effects or other characteristics are less prevalent,
less severe or more acceptable from a risk-benefit perspective. The therapeutic-related side effects could affect patient recruitment
or the ability of enrolled patients to complete the trial or result in potential product liability claims.
Since the start of President Trump’s administration in 2025 (the “Trump Administration”), U.S. policy changes have been implemented at a rapid pace and additional change is likely. It is difficult to predict how executive actions that may be taken under the current administration may affect the FDA’s ability to exercise its regulatory authority. If any actions impose constraints on the FDA’s ability to engage in routine oversight and product review activities in the normal course, our business may be negatively impacted. Additionally, the Trump Administration or other parts of the federal government could adopt legislation, regulations or policies that adversely affect our business or create a more challenging and costly environment to pursue the development, approval and commercialization of our product candidates. Recent developments at the FDA include announcement of a plan to phase out animal testing for monoclonal antibodies and certain other drugs, the proposed rare disease evidence principles program to facilitate approval of drugs to treat rare diseases with very small patient populations with significant unmet medical need and with a known genetic defect that is the major driver of the pathophysiology, and the announcement of a new Commissioner’s National Priority Voucher program for companies supporting certain U.S. national health priorities and interests. To the extent our competitors are selected for this new voucher pilot program, or are otherwise able to participate in any of these initiatives intended to accelerate drug development and application review, and obtain faster approval than us, our competitive position may be harmed.
Finally,
with the change in presidential administrations in 2025, there is substantial uncertainty as to how, if at all, the new
administration will seek to modify or revise the requirements and policies of the FDA and other regulatory agencies with
jurisdiction over our product candidates. The impending uncertainty could present new challenges or potential opportunities as we
navigate the clinical development and approval process for our product candidates. Any of these occurrences may materially harm our
business, financial condition, results of operations, stock price and prospects.
We
may seek Breakthrough Therapy designation for somesome, or allall, of our future product candidates. A Breakthrough Therapy is defined as a drug
or biologic that is intended, alone or in combination with one or more other drugs or biologics, to treat a serious or life-threatening
disease or condition and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug or biologic may demonstrate substantial improvement over
existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints. Sponsors of product candidates that have been designated as Breakthrough
Therapies are eligible to receive more intensive FDA guidance on developing an efficient drug development program, an organizational
commitment involving senior managers, and eligibility for rolling review and priority review. Drugs and biologics designated as Breakthrough
Therapies by the FDA may also be eligible for other expedited approval programs, including accelerated approval.
Designation
as a Breakthrough Therapy is within the discretion of the FDA. Accordingly, even if we believe one of our product candidates meets the
criteria for designation as a Breakthrough Therapy, the FDA may disagree and instead determine not to make such designation. In any event,
the receipt of a Breakthrough Therapy designation for a product candidate may not result in a faster development process, review or approval
compared to product candidates developed and considered for approval that have not received Breakthrough Designation and does not assure
ultimate approval by the FDA. In addition, even if one or more of our product candidates qualify as Breakthrough Therapies, the FDA may
later decide that the product no longer meets the conditions for qualification. Thus, even though we may seek Breakthrough Therapy designation
for CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, CLD-400current or some or all of our future product candidates for
the treatment of various cancers, there can be no assurance that we will receive breakthrough therapy designation.
Disruptions at the FDA and other governmental agencies and regulatory authorities could negatively affect the review of our regulatory submissions or impact our ability to access the public markets, which could negatively impact our business.
The ability of the FDA and other regulatory authorities to review and approve regulatory submissions can be affected by a variety of factors, including statutory, regulatory and policy changes, inadequate government budget funding levels, their ability to accept user fees, or a reduction in the FDA’s workforce and its ability to hire and retain key personnel, disruptions caused by government shutdowns and public health crises. There have been mass layoffs of federal government employees since the start of the Trump Administration in January 2025, the full impact of which remains unclear. Average review times at the agency have fluctuated as a result. In addition, government funding of the SEC and other government agencies on which our operations may rely, including those that fund research and development activities, is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable. The Trump Administration has made and is expected to continue to make changes in the leadership of various U.S. federal regulatory agencies. In addition, changes to U.S. federal government policy since January 2025 have led to, in some cases, legal challenges and uncertainty around the funding, functioning and policy priorities of the U.S. federal regulatory agencies, including the FDA.
We are unable to predict the extent to which the current U.S. federal administration may impose or seek to impose additional leadership or policy changes at the U.S. federal regulatory agencies responsible for regulating our business or changes to rules and policies impacting our operations. It is also unclear how executive actions or other potential actions by the Trump Administration or other parts of the federal government will impact the FDA or other regulatory authorities that oversee our business. Government proposals to reduce or eliminate budgetary deficits or limit federal agency personnel may include reduced allocations to the FDA and other related government agencies. These budgetary pressures may reduce the FDA’s ability to perform its responsibilities, potentially affecting our ability to progress development of our product candidates or obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates and could result in delays in our potential clinical trial timelines. Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may also slow the time necessary for the review and approval of INDs, which would adversely affect our business. A significant reduction in the FDA’s workforce or the FDA’s budget, or any future prolonged government shutdown, could significantly impact the ability of the FDA to timely review and process our regulatory submissions or take other actions critical to the development, manufacturing or marketing of our product candidates, if approved, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
In October and November 2025, the U.S. federal government endured the longest government shutdown in U.S. history due to the failure of Congress to pass an appropriations budget for fiscal year 2026, and a subsequent partial government shutdown ensued in January and February of 2026. There can be no assurance that there will not be similar shutdowns of the federal government in the future. While there were some exemptions from these shutdowns with respect to certain aspects of the work carried out by the FDA, including essential safety oversight and ongoing reviews of certain existing applications where there was carryover funding, other work of the FDA during that time, such as acceptance of new applications, was suspended and the FDA workforce was reduced. These and similar events may impact the functioning of the FDA, including but not limited subsequent government shutdowns or global health concerns, and could prevent the FDA or other regulatory authorities from conducting their regular inspections, reviews or other regulatory activities, could significantly impact the ability of the FDA or other regulatory authorities to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, any future government shutdown could impact our ability to access the public markets and obtain necessary capital in order to properly capitalize and continue our operations.
Even
if our development efforts are successful, we may not obtain regulatory approval of CLD-101our for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent
HGG, CLD-201, CLD-400current or any future product candidates in the United States or other jurisdictions, which would prevent us from commercializing
CLD-101our for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, CLD-400current and future product candidates. Even if we obtain regulatory
approval for CLD-101our for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, CLD-400current and future product candidates, any such approval
may be subject to limitations, including with respect to the approved indications or patient populations, which could impair our ability
to successfully commercialize CLD-101our for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, CLD-400current or any future product candidates.
We
are not permitted to market or promote or sell CLD-101our for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, CLD-400current or any future
product candidates before we receive regulatory approval from the FDA or other regulatory authorities, and we may never receive such
regulatory approval. Securing marketing approval requires the submission of extensive preclinical and clinical data and supporting information
to regulatory authorities for each therapeutic indication to establish the product candidate’s safety and efficacy for that indication.
Securing marketing approval also requires the submission of information about the product manufacturing process to, and inspection of
manufacturing facilities and clinical trial sites by, the regulatory authorities. If we do not receive approval from the FDA and other
regulatory authorities for any of CLD-101our for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, CLD-400current and future product candidates,
we will not be able to commercialize such product candidates in the United States or in other jurisdictions. If significant delays in
obtaining approval for and commercializing CLD-101our for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, CLD-400current and future product
candidates occur in any jurisdictions, our business, financial condition, results of operations, stock price and prospects will be materially
harmed. Even if CLD-101our for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, CLD-400current and future product candidates are approved,
they may:
We
have not previously submitted a Biologics License Application, or BLA, to the FDA, or a similar marketing application to other regulatory
authorities, for CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, CLD-400 or anyour product candidate,candidates, and we can provide
no assurance that we will ultimately be successful in obtaining regulatory approval for claims that are necessary or desirable for successful
marketing, if at all.
As
product candidates are developed through preclinical studies to later-stage clinical trials towards approval and commercialization, it
is common that various aspects of the development program, such as manufacturing methods and formulation, are altered along the way in
an effort to optimize processes and results. Any of these changes could cause CLD-101our for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent
HGG, CLD-201, CLD-400current or any future product candidates to perform differently and affect the results of planned clinical trials or other
future clinical trials conducted with the altered materials. Changes in third-party manufacturers and manufacturing processes may also
require additional testing, or notification to, or approval by the FDA or another regulatory authority. Such changes could be further
delayed due to development of commercial scale manufacturing operations in our new facility or at third-party manufacturers. This could
delay completion of clinical trials, require the conduct of bridging clinical trials or studies, require the repetition of one or more
clinical trials, increase clinical trial costs, delay approval of CLD-101our for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201,
CLD-400current and future product candidates and jeopardize our ability to commence product sales and generate revenue.
Future
legislative and regulatory proposals may materially impact the ability
of the FDA and other regulatory agencies to operate as they
have historically operated. We cannot be sure whether additional
legislative changes or executive orders will be enacted, or whether
any of the FDA’s regulations, guidance or interpretations will
be changed, or what the impact of such changes on the agency
and its scientific review staff, if any, may be. For example, the next FDA user
fee reauthorization package is(PDUFA expectedVIII) to enter entered
stakeholder negotiations beginning in mid-2025, with anyan agreement anticipated to be sent to Congress in
early 2027 for purposes of
initiating the legislative process. Reauthorization of the prescription drug user fee program would need to
be finalized by Congress
by the end of September 2027 in order to avoid a disruption in FDA’s review goals for NDAs and other activities
supported by
user fees assessed against industry.
Even
if CLD-101our for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, CLD-400current or any future product candidates receive regulatory approval,
we will be subject to ongoing obligations and continued regulatory review, which may result in significant additional expense and limit
how we manufacture and market our products.
The
FDA and other regulatory authorities will continue to closely monitor the safety profile of any product even after approval. If the FDA
or other regulatory authorities become aware of new safety information after approval of any of CLD-101our for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101
for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, CLD-400current and future product candidates, they may withdraw approval, issue public safety alerts, require labeling
changes or establishment of a REMS or similar strategy, impose significant restrictions on a product’s indicated uses or marketing,
or impose ongoing requirements for potentially costly post-approval studies or post-market surveillance. Any such restrictions could
limit sales of the product.
We
must comply with requirements concerning advertising and promotion for any product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval.
Promotional communications with respect to therapeutics are subject to a variety of legal and regulatory restrictions and continuing
review by the FDA, Department of Justice, Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General, state attorneys
general, members of Congress and the public. When the FDA or other regulatory authorities issue regulatory approval for a product candidate,
the regulatory approval is limited to those specific uses and indications for which a product is approved. If we are not able to obtain
FDA approval for desired uses or indications for CLD-101our for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, CLD-400current and future
product candidates, we may not market or promote them for those indications and uses, referred to as off-label uses, and our business,
financial condition, results of operations, stock price and prospects will be materially harmed. We also must sufficiently substantiate
any claims that we make for any products, including claims comparing those products to other companies’ products, and must abide
by the FDA’s strict requirements regarding the content of promotion and advertising.
If
we are found to have impermissibly promoted any of CLD-101our for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, CLD-400current and future
product candidates, we may become subject to significant liability and government fines. The FDA and other agencies actively enforce
the laws and regulations regarding product promotion, particularly those prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses, and a company that
is found to have improperly promoted a product may be subject to significant sanctions. The federal government has levied large civil
and criminal fines against companies for alleged improper promotion and has enjoined several companies from engaging in off-label promotion.
The FDA has also requested that companies enter into consent decrees or permanent injunctions under which specified promotional conduct
is changed or curtailed. In the United States, engaging in the impermissible promotion of any products, following approval, for off-label
uses can also subject us to false claims and other litigation under federal and state statutes. These include fraud and abuse and consumer
protection laws, which can lead to civil and criminal penalties and fines, agreements with governmental authorities that materially restrict
the manner in which we promote or distribute therapeutic products and conduct our business. These restrictions could include corporate
integrity agreements, suspension or exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare programs, and suspension and debarment
from government contracts and refusal of orders under existing government contracts. These False Claims Act lawsuits against manufacturers
of drugs and biologics have increased significantly in volume and breadth, leading to several substantial civil and criminal settlements
pertaining to certain sales practices and promoting off-label uses. In addition, False Claims Act lawsuits may expose manufacturers to
follow-on claims by private payers based on fraudulent marketing practices. This growth in litigation has increased the risk that a biopharmaceutical
company will have to defend a false claim action, pay settlement fines or restitution, as well as criminal and civil penalties, agree
to comply with burdensome reporting and compliance obligations, and be excluded from Medicare, Medicaid, or other federal and state healthcare
programs. If we do not lawfully promote our approved products, if any, we may become subject to such litigation and, if we do not successfully
defend against such actions, those actions may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations,
stock price and prospects.
In
the United States, the promotion of biopharmaceutical products is subject to additional FDA requirements and restrictions on promotional
statements. If, after CLD-101our for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, CLD-400current or any future product candidates obtains
marketing approval, the FDA determines that our promotional activities violate its regulations and policies pertaining to product promotion,
it could request that we modify our promotional materials or subject us to regulatory or other enforcement actions, including issuance
of warning letters or untitled letters, suspension or withdrawal of an approved product from the market, requests for recalls, payment
of civil fines, disgorgement of money, imposition of operating restrictions, injunctions or criminal prosecution, and other enforcement
actions. Similarly, industry codes in foreign jurisdictions may prohibit companies from engaging in certain promotional activities, and
regulatory agencies in various countries may enforce violations of such codes with civil penalties. If we become subject to regulatory
and enforcement actions, our business, financial condition, results of operations, stock price and prospects will be materially harmed.
The
FDA or other regulatory authorities may require us to file separate INDs for additional clinical trials we plan to conduct with our current
current lead product candidates, CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201 and CLD-400.candidates. We may not be able
to file
any additional INDs required for our current product candidates and any future product candidates on the timelines we
expect. For example,
we may experience manufacturing delays or other delays with IND-enabling studies, including due to a contagious
disease outbreak such
as the COVID-19 pandemic on suppliers, study sites or third-party contractors and vendors on whom we depend.
Moreover, we cannot be sure
that submission of an IND will result in the FDA or other regulatory authorities allowing further
clinical trials to begin, or that,
once begun, issues will not arise that suspend or terminate clinical trials. Additionally, even
if such regulatory authorities agree
with the design and implementation of the clinical trials set forth in an IND, we cannot
guarantee that such regulatory authorities will
not change their requirements in the future. These considerations also apply to new
clinical trials we may submit as amendments to existing
INDs or to a new IND. Any failure to file INDs on the expected timelines to
obtain regulatory approvals for our trials may prevent us
from completing our clinical trials or commercializing our products on a
timely basis, if at all. There are similar risks related to
the review and authorization of our protocols and amendments by other
regulatory authorities.
The
United States and many foreign jurisdictions have enacted or proposed legislative and regulatory changes affecting the healthcare system
that could prevent or delay marketing approval of our current or any future product candidates, restrict or regulate post-approval activities
and affect our ability to profitably sell a product for which we obtain marketing approval. Changes in regulations, statutes or the interpretation
of existing regulations could impact our business in the future by requiring, for example: (i) changes to our manufacturing arrangements,
(ii) additions or modifications to product labeling, (iii) the recall or discontinuation of our products or (iv) additional record-keeping
requirements. If any such changes were to be imposed, they could adversely affect the operation of our business. More recently, however,
on January 28, 2021, President Biden issued a new Executive Order which directs federal agencies to reconsider rules and other policies
that limit Americans’ access to healthcare and to consider actions that will protect and strengthen that access.
Our
ability to successfully launch and secure market acceptance of our
pipeline candidates, CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, and CLD-400 (if approved),candidates may be impacted by
contagious disease outbreaks such as the COVID-19
pandemic, the potential impact of which we may be able to predict or quantify with any
degree of certainty.
We
expect initially to develop our leadcurrent product candidates,candidates. CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201 and CLD-400.
A key part of our strategy, however, is to pursue clinical development of additional product candidates. Developing,
obtaining marketing
approval for, and commercializing additional product candidates will require substantial funding and will be
subject to the risks of
failure inherent in medical product development. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully
advance any of these additional
product candidates through the development process.
If
we or third-party contract research organizations, or CROs, or other contractors or consultants fail to comply with applicable federal,
state/provincial or local regulatory requirements, we could be subject to a range of regulatory actions that could affect our or our
contractors’ ability to develop and commercialize our therapeutic candidates and could harm or prevent sales of any affected therapeutics
that we are able to commercialize, or could substantially increase the costs and expenses of developing, commercializing and marketing
our therapeutics. Any threatened or actual government enforcement action could also generate adverse publicity and require that we devote
substantial resources that could otherwise be used in other aspects of our business. Increasing use of social media could give rise to
liability, breaches of data security or reputational damage.
Social
media is increasingly being used to communicate about our clinical development programs and the diseases our therapeutics are being developed
to treat, and we intend to utilize appropriate social media in connection with our commercialization efforts following approval of our
product candidates, if any. Social media practices in the biotechnology and biopharmaceutical industry continue to evolve and regulations
and regulatory guidance relating to such use are evolving and not always clear. This evolution creates uncertainty and risk of noncompliance
with regulations applicable to our business, resulting in potential regulatory actions against us, along with the potential for litigation
related to off-label marketing or other prohibited activities and heightened scrutiny by the FDA, the SEC and other regulators. For example,
patients may use social media channels to comment on their experience in an ongoing blinded clinical trial or to report an alleged adverse
event. If such disclosures occur, there is a risk that trial enrollmentenrolment may be adversely impacted, that we may fail to monitor and comply
with applicable adverse event reporting obligations or that we may not be able to defend our business or the public’s legitimate
interests in the face of the political and market pressures generated by social media due to restrictions on what we may say about our
product candidates. There is also a risk of inappropriate disclosure of sensitive information or negative or inaccurate posts or comments
about us on any social networking website. In addition, we may encounter attacks on social media regarding our company, management, product
candidates or products. If any of these events were to occur or we otherwise fail to comply with applicable regulations, we could incur
liability, face regulatory actions or incur other harm to our business.
RecentPast
statements and proposed action by the United States House of Representatives has been critical of the Chinese biopharmaceutical industry
and may raise scrutiny as to the use of our contract manufacturer in China.
Recently,
theThe U. S. House of
Representatives has been become critical of the Chinese biopharmaceutical industry with a focus on their alleged ties
to the Chinese
Communist Party and handling of Americans’ data. Proposed action by the House of Representatives includesincluded legislation
that could
restrict the ability of U.S. biopharmaceutical companies to collaborate with certain Chinese entities without losing the ability
to contract
with the U.S. government. We currentlyhave use Genscriptutilized ProBio in China tofor manufacturemanufacturing of the “CAL1” oncolytic vaccinia
virus strain. Although GenscriptWhile ProBio hasis not been
currently identified as a “biotechnology company of concern” as set forth in the
proposed legislation, in the event that Genscript ProBio
is defined as such, or their activities are otherwise scrutinized by the U.S.
government, this determination could adversely affect our
ability to contract manufacture the CAL1 oncolytic vaccinia virus strain to
be use with our allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem
cells.
We
may rely on third-party contract manufacturers to manufacture our clinical trial product supplies and for commercial scale manufacturing.
There can be no assurance that our clinical development will not be limited, interrupted, or of satisfactory quality or continue to be
available at acceptable prices. In particular, any replacement of our contract manufacturer could require significant effort and expertise
because there may be a limited number of qualified replacements. Any delays in obtaining adequate supplies of our product candidates
that meet the necessary quality standards, including delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic,standards may delay our development or commercialization.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Recent Developments”
New heading “Debt Obligations”
Removed heading “The FLAG Merger and Related Transactions”
Removed heading “Shelf Registration Statement”
Removed heading “Termination of Standby Equity Purchase Agreement”
Removed heading “Increase in Maximum Aggregate Offering Amount under the At The Market Offering Agreement”
Removed heading “Registered Direct and Concurrent Private Placement”
Removed heading “Financing and Financing-Related Transactions During the Year Ended December 31, 2024”
Removed heading “Reverse Stock Split”
Removed heading “Public Financing”
Removed heading “Confidentially Marketed Public Offering (CMPO)”
Removed heading “Subscription Agreements”
Removed heading “Strategic Investment into Nova Cell”
Removed heading “At The Market Offering Agreement”
Removed heading “2024 Bridge Loan”
Removed heading “Convertible Promissory Notes”
Removed heading “Convertible Promissory Notes and Unasserted Claim Settlement”
Removed heading “2021 Term Notes Payable”
Removed heading “2022 Term Notes Payable”
Removed heading “2023 Term Notes Payable”
Removed heading “Promissory Note Loan Agreement”
Removed heading “Public and Private Warrants Assumed in FLAG Merger”
Removed heading “Common Stock Non-Series Warrants”
Removed heading “Placement Agent Warrants”
Removed heading “Series B Warrants”
Removed heading “Series C Warrants”
Removed heading “Series B-1 Warrants”
Removed heading “Series C-1 Warrants”
Removed heading “Series D Warrants”
Removed heading “Series E Warrants”
Removed heading “Series F Warrants”
Removed heading “Forward Purchase Agreement”
Largest changes
“On March 8, 2024, Calidi entered into settlement agreement (“Settlement Agreement”) with an investor who previously enter into a series of related agreements including (i) an agreement with Calidi Cure to fund the purchase of Calidi Series B Preferred Stock; (ii) a Non-Redemption Agreement with Calidi; (iii) an OTC Equity Prepaid Forward Purchase Agreement with Calidi; …”see in full comparison
“Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to raise additional funding. We plan to raise additional capital through public or private equity or debt financings to fulfill our operating and capital requirements for at least 12 months from the date of the issuance of the financial statements. However, we may not be able to secure such financing in a timely manner or on favorable terms, if at all. …”see in full comparison
“On July 9, 2025, we entered into an inducement offer letter agreement (the “Warrant Inducement Offer”) with seven holders of our existing Series A warrants, Series B-1 warrants, Series C-1 warrants, Series D warrants, Series E warrants, and Series F warrants (together the “Existing Warrants”). Pursuant to the Warrant Inducement Offer, such warrant holders immediately exercised some or all of their respective outstanding Existing Warrants at a reduced exercise price, to purchase an aggregate of 549,596 shares of our common stock. …”see in full comparison
“On October 17, 2024, Calidi received notice from the NYSE that Calidi’s Public Warrants to purchase common stock are no longer suitable for listing pursuant to Section 1001 of the NYSE American Company Guide due to the low trading price of such public warrants, and that the NYSE Regulation has determined to commence proceedings to delist the public warrants. The Public Warrants may be traded on the OTC Pink Marketplace under the symbol CLDWW.”see in full comparison
“The Promissory Note bears a simple interest rate at 15.0% per annum and matures on the third calendar year from the Payment Date (the “Maturity Date”) unless due earlier due to an event of a default under the terms of the Promissory Note. Calidi agreed to pay annual payments of accrued interest after each calendar year from the Payment Date until any remaining interest is paid in full on the Maturity Date.”see in full comparison
“Increase in Maximum Aggregate Offering Amount under the At The Market Offering Agreement”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (184)
We are a publicly traded biotechnology company pioneering the development of targeted therapies with the potential to deliver genetic medicines to distal sites of disease. Our proprietary RedTail platform features an engineered enveloped oncolytic virus designed for systemic delivery and targeting of metastatic sites. This advanced enveloped technology is intended to shield the virus from immune clearance, allowing virotherapy to effectively reach tumor sites, induce tumor lysis, and deliver potent genetic medicine(s) to metastatic locations. We expect to file an IND for a Phase I trial by the end of 2026 with CLD-401, the first compound from the RedTail platform, delivering IL-15 superagonist to the tumor microenvironment (“TME”).
Our RedTail platform is the culmination of over a decade of work around genetic engineering of viruses and allows for the systemic administration of a proprietarily-modified oncolytic virus that can:
Our legacy SuperNova and NeuroNova platforms are designed to:
Oncolytic viruses have been pursued as therapeutic platforms in oncology because of their ability to preferentially infect and replicate within cancer cells, resulting in both direct lysis of the tumor cells as well as activation of an antitumor immune response, while leaving normal, healthy cells unharmed. Despite the promises of oncolytic viruses, a major obstacle against their therapeutic use has been their rapid elimination by the patient’s immune system; this has meant that oncolytic viruses have been largely relegated to being used for local delivery to tumors but have not been successful in patients with extensive metastatic disease. The only approved oncolytic virus therapy is T-VEC (Imlygic®), a modified herpes simplex virus (HSV) for the treatment of patients with melanoma given intratumorally.
We have been working on protecting oncolytic viruses from immune clearance for over a decade. Our NeuroNova investigational drug candidate is currently in a Phase 1 trial being run and funded by our partner, City of Hope, in an investigator-initiated trial and we have an open IND for a Phase 1 trial for our SuperNova investigational drug candidate (CLD-201). In July 2025 we were granted Fast Track Designation to CLD-201 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of patients with soft tissue sarcoma. The platforms used in NeuroNova and SuperNova use oncolytic viruses embedded in stem cells to avoid immune clearance and facilitate initial viral amplification and expansion at the tumor sites. This approach has shown substantial benefit over unprotected virus in preclinical studies of intratumoral delivery, but stem cell encapsulation does not allow for systemic delivery of virus to tumor metastases in animal models. The size of the stem cells prohibited efficient dissemination into metastatic sites.
More recently, we used the learnings from NeuroNova and SuperNova to create RedTail, a novel oncolytic viral platform for systemic delivery. The virus used in RedTail has been proprietarily engineered to avoid immune clearance and to specifically replicate in tumor tissue where the virus also has the ability to deliver genetic medicines to the tumor microenvironment. RedTail utilizes a proprietary form of enveloped virus with genetic modifications, including engineered expression of CD55 on the enveloped virus, to avoid immune clearance. Because the virus is not encapsulated in stem cells, it is thousands of times smaller than the NeuroNova or SuperNova products and disseminates efficiently into metastatic sites in syngeneic animal models. In addition, the virus can be engineered to express genetic medicines while replicating in the tumor.
CLD-401, the first lead derived from the RedTail platform. CLD-401 is enveloped and overexpressed CD55 on its outer membrane. It is tropic for tumor cells and, when replicating, expresses IL-15 superagonist at high concentrations in the tumor microenvironment. In animal models, CLD-401 can be given systemically and clear metastatic sites in syngeneic tumor mouse models with demonstrated enhanced biological efficacy. The combination of the RedTail virus with its genetic payload drives complete tumor eradication in the tumor models compared to the RedTail virus alone. We believe that RedTail, given its systemic administration and targeting to metastatic sites and its delivery of genetic medicines, represents a major advancement in the space of oncolytic virus in oncology. The company is developing additional leads from the RedTail platform including compounds that simultaneously express a bispecific T-cell engager (TCE) and a T-cell activator as well as compounds for use outside of oncology.
We
are a clinical-stage immuno-oncology company that is developing innovative stem cell-based and enveloped platforms for the delivery and
potentiation of oncolytic virotherapies to treat cancer. Our pipeline includes off-the-shelf product candidates designed to protect oncolytic
viruses from being quickly inactivated by the patient’s immune system and target tumor sites. Once approved by the FDA, this improved
delivery, both localized and systemic, and increased potency will enable us to develop treatments that target various types of cancer
at different stages of progression. Our goal is to create therapies that work on any tumor, regardless of its genetic profile (universal
treatments). In addition to direct targeting and killing cancer cells, our oncolytic virotherapies have shown signs of changing the tumor
immune environment to induce strong anti-tumor immunity that could lead to better cancer treatment and prevent tumor recurrence.
CLD-101
(NeuroNova™ Platform) for Newly Diagnosed High Grade Glioma (“HGG”) (also referred to as “NNV1” as to the
indication). CLD-101 is our product candidate utilizing our NeuroNova™ Platform targeting HGG. Prior to our licensing agreement
with Northwestern University, an open-label, investigator sponsored, Phase 1, dose- escalation clinical trial for NNV1 in patients with
newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas was completed. This clinical trial demonstrated that single administration of CLD-101 was well tolerated
in patients with newly diagnosed HGG. Northwestern University began recruiting for a Phase 1b/2 clinical trial during the first quarter
of 2025. This trial will explore the final dosing regimen for NNV1, including the feasibility of repeated dosing in newly diagnosed HGG.
Extensive biomarker analysis will be performed on tumor biopsies and blood samples to determine viral distribution, specific tumor targeting
and induction of anti-tumor immunity.
CLD-101
for Recurrent HGG (also referred to as “NNV2” as to the recurrent HGG indication). A phase 1 study evaluating the safety
and feasibility of administering repeated doses of CLD-101 intracerebrally to patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas began treatment
in May 2023. The study is being run by our partner, City of Hope, and started enrolling cohort 4 in January 2024. Clinical data from
patients with recurrent HGG treated with repeated doses of CLD-101 supported the start of a trial of repeated doses in newly
diagnosed HGG.
CLD-201
(SuperNova™) for solid tumors (breast cancer, head & neck squamous cell carcinoma
(HNSCC), and soft tissue sarcoma (also referred to as “SNV1”). SNV1 is our first internally developed pre-clinical
product candidate utilizing our SuperNova™ Delivery Platform. Based on our pre-clinical studies, we believe SNV1 has therapeutic
potential for the treatment of multiple solid tumors such as head and neck cancer, breast cancer and sarcoma. We filed our IND application with
the FDA for the clinical development of CLD-201 in March 2025 and we anticipate commencing a Phase 1 clinical trial for SNV1 during the
first half of 2025.
CLD-301
(AAA) for Multiple Indications. We are also currently engaged in early discovery research involving Adult Allogeneic Adipose-derived
(“AAA”) stem cells for various indications and therapies. These AAA stem cells are theoretically multipotent, differentiating
along the adipocyte, chondrocyte, myocyte, neuronal, and osteoblast lineages, and may have the ability to serve in other capacities,
such as providing hematopoietic support and gene transfer with potential applications for repair and regeneration of acute and chronically
damaged tissues. Pre-clinical studies involving toxicity and efficacy will be needed before an IND application may be filed with the
FDA.
Our
subsidiary Nova Cell, Inc. (“Nova Cell”) was formed to be a technology service provider that develops innovative stem cell-based
products using our cellular manufacturing process. Through Nova Cell we anticipate expanding potential uses from oncology to other fields
that require regenerative medical applications, such as cosmetics, orthopedics, auto-immune diseases, and various other therapies.
CLD-400
(RTNova) for Lung cancer and Metastatic Solid Tumors, our pre-clinical program involving enveloped oncolytic viruses (discovery phase),
builds upon our experience of using cells to protect, potentiate and deliver virotherapies. CLD-400 program is derived from research
from prior pre-clinical CLD-202 program. RTNova consists of an engineered vaccinia virus enveloped by a cell membrane, that is potentially
capable of targeting lung cancer and advanced metastatic disease due to its increased ability to survive in the bloodstream. Metastatic
solid tumors involve cancer cells that break away from where they first formed (primary cancer) and travel through the blood or lymph
system to form new tumors, known as metastatic tumors, in other parts of the body. In preclinical studies, RTNova has shown early signs
of its resistance to human humoral immunity and capability to target multiple distant and diverse tumors and transform their microenvironments
leading to their elimination. In addition, the program has shown potential synergistic effects with other immunotherapies, including
cell therapies, to attack and eliminate disseminated solid tumors.
Since
inception, our operations have focused on organizing and staffing our company, business planning, raising capital, acquiring and developing
our technology, establishing our intellectual property portfolio, identifying potential product candidates and undertaking preclinical
studies and manufacturing. We do not have any products approved for sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales. We have
funded our operations primarily through private sales of common stock, convertible preferred stock, contingentlywarrants, convertible and convertible
promissory notes, term loans, lines of credit,debt, and Simplethe Agreementsissuance
of forpublicly Futuretraded Equity (“SAFE”).securities. These investments have included
and have been made by various related parties, including our largestformer investorchief
executive officer and Chiefformer Executive Officer and Chairmanchairman of the Board of
Directors.
Changes
in economic conditions, including rising interest rates, public health issues, lower consumer confidence, volatile equity capital marketsmarkets,
andtariffs, ongoing supply chain disruptionsdisruptions, and the impacts of geopolitical conflicts, may also affect our business.
As
a result, we will need substantial additional funding to support our continuing operations and pursue our growth strategy. Until we can
generate significant revenue from product sales, if ever, we expect to finance our operations through a combination of public or private
equity offerings and debt financings or other sources, such as potential collaboration agreements, strategic alliancesalliances, and licensing
arrangements. We may be unable to raise additional funds or enter into such other agreements or arrangements when needed on acceptable
terms, or at all. Our inability to raise capital or enter into such agreements as, and when needed, could have a material adverse effect
on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Based
on our operating plan, we believe we do not have sufficient cash on hand to support current operations for at least one year from the
date of issuance of our consolidated financial statements as of,of and for the year ended December 31, 2024.2025. We have concluded that this
circumstance raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. See Note 1 to our annualaudited consolidated financial
statements. In addition, we will be required to raise additional capital through the issuance of our equity securities to support our
operations which will have an ownership and economic dilutive effect to our current shareholders who purchased their shares of common
stock at prices above our current trading price, and such capital raising may adversely affect the price of our common stock. Further,
the sale of or the perception of a sale of a substantial number of our common stock by certain selling securityholders pursuant to another
registration statement filed with the SEC will adversely affect the price of our common stock due to our limited trading volume andvolume, adversely
affect the share price that we may obtain in future financingsfinancings, and may adversely affect our ability to conduct and complete future financings.
For
additional discussion on our liquidity and the Closing of the FLAG Merger,liquidity, see the section below and further disclosures in the section
titled “Liquidity and Capital
Resources” included herein.
Recent Developments
On July 9, 2025, we entered into an inducement offer letter agreement (the “Warrant Inducement Offer”) with seven holders of our existing Series A warrants, Series B-1 warrants, Series C-1 warrants, Series D warrants, Series E warrants, and Series F warrants (together the “Existing Warrants”). Pursuant to the Warrant Inducement Offer, such warrant holders immediately exercised some or all of their respective outstanding Existing Warrants at a reduced exercise price, to purchase an aggregate of 549,596 shares of our common stock. The gross proceeds from the exercise of the induced warrants were $4.6 million, prior to deducting placement agent fees and offering expenses. In consideration for the immediate exercise of some or all of the Existing Warrants for cash, we issued unregistered new Series H common stock warrants (“Series H Warrants”) to purchase up to 549,587 shares of common stock. We filed a resale registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-288784), to register the shares underlying the Series H Warrants, which registration statement was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on July 25, 2025. The Warrant Inducement Offer closed on July 10, 2025. For additional discussion of this Warrant Inducement Offer, see the section below and further disclosures in the section titled “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Financing Activities” included herein.
On July 24, 2025, the Compensation Committee of Calidi approved the elimination of the position of President, Medical and Scientific Affairs, held by Dr. Boris Minev. As a result, Dr. Minev ceased to serve as an executive officer and a Section 16 officer of Calidi, effective July 29, 2025. On August 8, 2025, we executed a General Release of Claims and Separation Agreement with Dr. Minev effective on August 15, 2025. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, we are obligated to pay Dr. Minev, (i) $0.1 million in relation to a negotiated bonus for the NNV1 and SNV1 IND approvals within 10 days following the Revocation Period (which is seven business days from August 8, 2025, and excluding such date), and (ii) $0.2 million separation pay in the form of compensation continuation over six months pursuant to our regular and customary payroll schedule, less all regular and customary payroll withholdings and shall pay Dr. Minev’s COBRA premiums for six months, commencing August 2025, upon timely election.
On August 20, 2025, we entered into an underwriting agreement with Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc., as representative of the various underwriters, in connection with the issuance and public sale offering of various securities (the “August Public Offering”), including: (i) 1,922,764 common stock units (“Common Stock Unit”), which includes the 450,000 Common Stock Units purchased pursuant to the exercise, in full, of the Over-Allotment Option and (ii) 1,528,000 pre-funded warrant units, resulting in gross proceeds of approximately $6.9 million, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other estimated offering expenses. The August Public Offering closed on August 21, 2025. For additional discussion of this Warrant Inducement Offer, see the section below and further disclosures in the section titled “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Financing Activities” included herein.
On September 16, 2025, the Board approved the elimination of the position of Chief Legal Officer and, as a result, the termination of the employment agreement with Ms. Wendy Pizarro Campbell (the “Employment Agreement”), effective as of October 17, 2025 (“Effective Date”). Per the terms of the Employment Agreement, Ms. Campbell was given a 30-day written notice of termination. On the Effective Date, and as a result of the termination of the Employment Agreement, Ms. Campbell ceased to serve as an executive officer and Section 16 officer of Calidi. On September 17, 2025, we executed a General Release of Claims and Separation Agreement (“Agreement”) with Ms. Campbell effective on September 24, 2025 (the “Effective Date”). Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, on the Effective Date, we are obligated to pay i) a bonus in the amount of $0.1 million, upon the successful and effective corporate spin-off, out-licensing, or similar transaction relating to Nova Cell, Inc. (“Nova Cell”) prior to October 31, 2025, and (ii) $0.2 million severance pay in the form of compensation continuation over six months pursuant to our regular and customary payroll schedule, less all regular and customary payroll withholdings and shall pay Ms. Campbell’s COBRA premiums for six months, commencing October 2025, upon timely election. As of December 31, 2025, we paid the bonus of $0.1 million in connection with the sale of the investment in Nova Cell.
On October 27, 2025, we entered into a Stock Repurchase Agreement (the “SRA”) and Material Purchase Agreement (the “MPA” and together with the SRA the “Agreements”), with, a then majority owned subsidiary, Nova Cell. In accordance with the Agreements, we sold and transferred all 22,500,000 of our shares of common stock in Nova Cell (the “Repurchased Shares”), representing an ownership interest of 75%, back to Nova Cell, for a purchase price of $6.0 million (the “Purchase Price”). The Purchase Price for the Repurchased Shares was or shall be satisfied (A) in part by cancellation of indebtedness under the September 17, 2024, promissory note, net of specified offsets (including a $50 thousand cash offset), resulting in an Indebtedness Cancellation Amount of $1.2 million, and (B) the balance, by Deferred Consideration of $4.8 million payable after closing, as more fully described in the SRA. As of December 31, 2025, no Deferred Consideration has been recognized, and the full amount remains constrained until underlying uncertainties are resolved. After the Deferred Consideration is fully satisfied, the SRA also provides for an ongoing royalty at a fixed percentage of Covered Gross Revenue attributable to or derivative of the materials listed on Schedule A to the MPA ending on the tenth anniversary of Nova Cell’s first product sale. Furthermore, as part of the Agreements, we sold and transferred certain materials to Nova Cell as listed on Schedule 1 to the MPA. Following the closing of the Agreements, Nova Cell is no longer our subsidiary.
On November 7, 2025, we presented new data on our first therapeutic candidate from our RedTail platform, CLD-401, at the Society of Immunotherapy for Cancer (“SITC”) Annual Meeting.
On March 5, 2026, the Company entered into an Amendment to Common Stock Purchase Warrants Agreement (the “Warrant Amendment”) with certain investors that participated in the March Offering described below, in connection with the terms of certain of the Company’s outstanding common warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock (the “Existing Warrants”). As originally issued, the Existing Warrants provided for the purchase of:
Per the Warrant Amendment, the exercise price for each of such Existing Warrants was reduced to $0.50 per share, subject to further adjustment as set forth in the Existing Warrants and any other document governing the terms thereunder. All other terms and conditions of the Existing Warrants remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
On March 6, 2026, we entered into an Underwriting Agreement with the Underwriter, in connection with the Offering of: (i) 2,278,731 Common Stock Units, which includes 1,575,000 Common Stock Units purchased pursuant to the exercise, in full, of the Over-Allotment Option, sold to the public at a price of $0.50 per Common Stock Unit, and (ii) 9,815,900 pre-funded warrant units Pre-Funded Units, sold to the public at a price of $0.499 per Pre-Funded Unit, resulting in gross proceeds of approximately $6.0 million, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other estimated offering expenses. For more details in relation to the Offering, see “Financing and Financing-Related Transactions Subsequent to December 31, 2025” below.
The
FLAG Merger and Related Transactions
On
September 12, 2023, FLAG consummated a series of transactions that resulted in the merger of FLAG Merger Sub Inc., a Nevada corporation
and a wholly-owned subsidiary of FLAG (“Merger Sub”) and Calidi NV pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended,
dated as of January 9, 2023. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, the business combination was effected through the merger
of Merger Sub with and into Calidi NV, with Calidi NV surviving such merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of FLAG. Historical common share
amounts of Calidi NV have been retroactively restated based on the conversion ratio of approximately 0.42 (the “Conversion Ratio”).
Following the consummation of the business combination, FLAG was renamed “Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc.”
As
a result of the Business Combination, all outstanding stock of Calidi NV were cancelled in exchange for the right to receive newly issued
shares of Common Stock (also referred to as “Calidi Common Stock”), par value $0.0001 per share, and all outstanding options
to purchase Calidi stock were assumed by Calidi. The total consideration received by Calidi Security Holders at the Closing of the transactions
contemplated by the Merger Agreement is the newly issued shares of Common Stock and securities convertible or exchangeable for newly
issued shares of Common Stock with an aggregate value equal $250.0 million, plus an adjustment of $23.8 million pursuant to the net debt
adjustment provisions of the Merger Agreement by reason of the Series B Financing. As a result, the Calidi Security Holders received
an aggregate of 2,737,560 shares of Common Stock as Merger Consideration.
As
additional consideration, each Calidi stockholder was entitled to earn, on a pro rata basis, up to 1,800,000 Escalation Shares. During
the Escalation Period, Calidi Stockholders may be entitled to receive up to 1,800,000 Escalation Shares with incremental releases of
450,000 shares upon the achievement of each share price hurdle if the trading price of Common Stock is $120.00, $140.00, $160.00 and
$180.00, respectively, for a period of any 20 days within any 30-consecutive-day trading period. The Escalation Shares have been placed
in escrow and are outstanding from and after the Closing, subject to cancellation if the applicable price targets are not achieved. While
in escrow, the shares will be non-voting.
Holders
of FLAG Class A Common Stock who did not redeem their shares obtained their pro rata portion of an additional 8,585 Non-Redeeming Continuation
Shares issued at Closing. At the Closing, Calidi NV Security Holders own approximately 76% of the outstanding shares of Calidi Common
Stock.
See
the section below titled “Liquidity and Capital Resources” included herein for additional disclosures.
We
track external research and development costs on a program-by-program basis beginning, with respect to each program, upon our
internal internal
nomination of a candidate in that program for further preclinical and clinical development. External costs include fees
paid to consultants,
contractors and vendors, including contract development and manufacturing organizations (“CMOsCDMOs”),
and clinical research organizations (“CROs”),
in connection with our preclinical, clinical and manufacturing activities
and license milestone payments related to candidate development.
General
and administrative expenses include salaries and other compensation-related costs, including stock-based compensation, for personnel
in executive, finance and accounting, business development, operationsoperations, and administrative roles. Other significant costs include professional
service and consulting fees including legal fees relating to intellectual property and corporate matters, accounting fees, recruiting
costs and costs for consultants utilized to supplement our personnel, insurance costs, travel costs, facility and office-related costs
not included in research and development expenses and depreciation and amortization.
Other
Income or Expenses,(Expenses), Net
Other
income or expenses,(expenses), net, primarily includes the changes in fair value of debt instruments, warrants,warrants and derivatives. The changes in
the fair value of these
instruments are recorded in change in fair value of debt, other liabilities,liabilities and derivatives, and change in fair
value of debt, other liabilities,
and derivatives – related party, included as a component of other income or expenses,(expense), net, in
the consolidated statements of operations.
At
the Closing of the FLAG Merger, all convertible instruments outstanding were converted into Calidi Common Stock immediately prior the
closing of the FLAG Merger and are no longer outstanding as of the Closing date.
Interest
expense primarily consists of amortization of discounts on convertible and term notes, including from related parties, and other interest
expense incurred
from financing leases and other obligations.
Other
income also includes grant income generated from a grant awarded to us by the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (“CIRM”)
in December 2022. Proceeds from the CIRM grant are recognized over the period necessary to match the related research and development
expenses when it is probable that we have complied with the CIRM conditions and will receive the proceeds pursuant to the milestones
defined in the grant as reimbursement of those expenditures. Any CIRM grant proceeds received in advance of having incurred the related
research and development expenses are recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and recognized as othergrant income onin our
consolidated statements of operations when the related research and developments expenses are incurred.
Income
TaxesTax Provision
Since
inception, we have incurred net operating losses primarily for U.S. federal and state income tax purposes and have not reflected any
benefit of such net operating loss carryforwards for any periods presented in this Form 10-K. The income tax provision in the
periods periods
presented is entirely attributable to amounts recorded from StemVacStemVac, GmbH operations, our wholly-owned German subsidiary
that provides research
and development services to us under a cost-plus development agreement.
Research
and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, and 20232024 were $8.9$9.7 million and $13.0$8.9 million, respectively. The $4.1$0.8 million
decreaseincrease was primarily attributable to decreaseincreases in consulting costs of $0.5 million, rent expenses of $0.3 million, drug manufacturing
and preclinical studiesexpenses of $3.4$0.2 million, and office expenses of $0.2 million, partially offset by decrease in salaries and benefits
of $0.3 million, lab supplies of $0.2 million, consulting costs of $0.1 million, and other expenses of $0.1$0.4 million.
General
and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 20242025 and 20232024 were $12.9$10.5 million and $16.0$12.9 million, respectively. The $3.1$2.4
million decrease was primarily due to decreases in compensationinsurance costs of $3.0$0.7 million arising from lower share based compensation
expenses, decrease in headcount and lower separation costs,million, legal and settlement expenses of $0.9$0.6 million, consultingsalaries and directors’ expenses benefits
of $0.4$0.3 million,
and otheraccounting expenses of $0.3 million, partially offset by increases in insurance costs of $0.9 million, marketing and
advertising expenses of $0.3 million, and certain other public company expenses of $0.3$0.2 million, investor relations expenses of $0.2 million,
and rent expenses of $0.1 million.
Other
income (expense), net for the year ended December 31, 20242025 and 20232024 were $0.4 million and $0.2 million other expense,income respectively.
Theand $0.2$0.4 million increaseother expense,
respectively. The $0.6 million decrease in net expenses primarily relates to a decrease in grantinterest expense of $0.7 million,
increase in other income fromof CIRM$0.2 million, primarily related to the gain on sale of $2.7our millioninvestment andin theNova Cell, partially offset by
a net change
in fair value of Forwardother Purchase Agreement Derivative Asset, Public Warrants,liabilities and Private Placement Warrantsderivatives of $0.8 million, partially
offset by decreases in Series B Convertible Preferred Stock financing costs of $2.7 million, debt extinguishment losses of $0.5 million,
and interest expense of $0.1$0.3 million.
Since
inception, we have funded our operations primarily through private sales of common stock, convertible preferred stock, contingently convertible
and convertiblewarrants, promissory notes, term loans,debt, linesand
the issuance of credit,publicly andtraded SAFEs.securities. TheseCertain of these investments havewere also been made by and includedwith various
related parties.
As
of December 31, 2024,2025, we had a cash balance of $9.6$5.6 million and restricted cash of $0.2 million. Our debt and liability obligations as
of December 31, 20242025 include $4.4$2.4 million in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities, including related party
amounts, $3.1$1.7 million in operating lease liabilities, $3.0$0.6 million in term notes payable, including related party amounts, $0.6 million
in promissory notes, $0.6 million in related party other current liabilities, $0.2 million in bridge loan payable, $0.2$0.3 million in finance
lease liabilities, and
$0.1 million in warrant liabilities, including related party amounts. Subsequent to December 31, 2024, principal
and interest of $2.8 million were paid.
Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to raise additional funding. We plan to raise additional capital through public or private equity or debt financings to fulfill our operating and capital requirements for at least 12 months from the date of the issuance of the financial statements. However, we may not be able to secure such financing in a timely manner or on favorable terms, if at all. Thus, we estimate that based on our current liquidity resources, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within 12 months from the date of issuance of these financial statements.
March 2026 Confidentially Marketed Public Offering (CMPO)
On March 6, 2026, we entered into an underwriting agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”) with Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc., as sole underwriter (“Underwriter”), in connection with the issuance and sale (the “Offering”) of: (i) 2,278,731 common stock units (“Common Stock Units”), which includes 1,575,000 Common Stock Units purchased pursuant to the exercise, in full, of the Over-Allotment Option, sold to the public at a price of $0.50 per Common Stock Unit, and (ii) 9,815,900 pre-funded warrant units (“Pre-Funded Units”), sold to the public at a price of $0.499 per Pre-Funded Unit, resulting in gross proceeds of approximately $6.0 million, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other estimated offering expenses. In connection with the Offering, we also issued to the Underwriter (or its designees) a warrant (the “Underwriter’s Warrant”) to purchase up to 604,732 shares of Common Stock of Calidi, par value $0.0001. The Underwriter’s Warrant has an exercise price of $0.625, is exercisable on or after the date of issuance, and will expire on March 9, 2031.
Each Common Stock Unit consisted of (i) one share of Common Stock, (ii) one Series J common stock warrant (“Series J Warrants”) to purchase one share of Common Stock (or pre-funded warrants to purchase one share of Common Stock in lieu thereof), (iii) one Series K common stock warrant (“Series K Warrants”) to purchase one share of Common Stock (or pre-funded warrants to purchase one share of Common Stock in lieu thereof), and (iv) one Series L common stock warrant (“Series L Warrants” and together with the Series J Warrants and the Series K Warrants, the “Common Warrants”) to purchase one share of Common Stock (or pre-funded warrants to purchase one share of Common Stock in lieu thereof). Each Pre-Funded Unit consisted of (i) one pre-funded warrant (the “Pre-Funded Warrants”), (ii) one Series J Warrant, (iii) one Series K Warrant, and (iv) one Series L Warrant. The Common Warrants included in the Pre-Funded Units are identical to the Common Warrants included in the Common Stock Units.
The Series J Warrants have an initial exercise price of $0.50 per share. The Series J Warrants are exercisable immediately, subject to certain limitations described herein. The Series J Warrants expire five (5) years from the date of issuance. The Series K Warrants have an initial exercise price of $0.50 per share. The Series K Warrants are exercisable immediately, subject to certain limitations described herein. The Series K Warrants will expire one (1) year from the date of issuance. The Series L Warrants have an initial exercise price of $0.50 per share. The Series L Warrants are exercisable immediately, subject to certain limitations described herein. The Series L Warrants expire six (6) months from the date of issuance.
The Common Stock Units, the Pre-Funded Units, the shares of Common Stock comprising the Common Stock Units, the Common Warrants, the Pre-Funded Warrants, the shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Common Warrants, and the Pre-Funded Warrants were offered by Calidi pursuant to a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-284229), that was filed with the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on January 10, 2025 and declared effective on February 7, 2025, including the prospectus forming a part of the registration statement, a final prospectus supplement thereto, which was filed with the SEC on March 9, 2026, pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the related registration statement filed with the SEC on March 5, 2026 under Rule 462(b) of the Securities Act, which became automatically effective upon filing. The Offering closed on March 9, 2026 (the “Closing Date”).
On March 6, 2026, we also entered into a warrant agency agreement (the “Warrant Agency Agreement”) with Equiniti Trust Company, LLC, as warrant agent (the “Warrant Agent”).
Since the closing of the Offering, 2,291,000 Pre-Funded Warrants have been exercised.
On
January 9, 2025, Calidi entered into a Placement Agency Agreement with Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. (the “Placement
Agent”), pursuant to which Calidi agreed to issue and sell in a public offering 5,000,000 shares of Calidi’s common
stock (the “Shares”), par value $0.0001 per share, at a purchase price of $0.85 per Share. The closing of the offering
took place on January 10, 2025. The gross proceeds from the offering were $4.3 million, before deducting placement agent
fees and other offering expenses payable by Calidi and excluding the net proceeds, if any, from the exercise of the Placement Agent
Warrants (as defined below). The common stock shares were offered by Calidi pursuant to a shelf registration statement on Form S-3,
which was declared effective by the Securities Exchange Commission on October 10, 2024.
Shelf
Registration Statement
On
January 10, 2025, Calidi filed a Form S-3 shelf registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, which was declared effective
by the SEC on February 7, 2025, providing for the public offer and sale of up to $25.0 million of Calidi’s shares of common stock.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, there have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed under the heading “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, which was filed with the SEC on March 27, 2026.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (1)
During
the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, there have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed under the
heading heading
“Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, which was
filed with
the SEC on March 27, 2026.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Reverse Stock Split”
New heading “Financing Matters”
New heading “New Facility Lease”
New heading “Appointment of Director”
New heading “Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”
New heading “Other Income (Expense), Net”
Removed heading “Research and Development Expenses”
Removed heading “General and Administrative Expenses”
Removed heading “Research and Development Expenses”
Removed heading “General and Administrative Expenses”
Removed heading “Sources of Liquidity”
Removed heading “Financing and Financing-Related Transactions During the Three Months Ended March 31, 2026”
Removed heading “Debt Obligations”
Removed heading “Related Party Transactions”
Largest changes
“We anticipate that our general and administrative expenses will increase in the future as our business expands to support expected growth in research and development activities, including our future clinical programs. These increases will likely include increased costs related to the hiring of additional personnel and fees to outside service providers, among other expenses. …”see in full comparison
“Financing and Financing-Related Transactions During the Three Months Ended March 31, 2026”see in full comparison
“On March 6, 2026, we entered into an Underwriting Agreement with Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (75)
The
following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 (this “Quarterly Report”). This information should also be read in conjunction with our audited
consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 (“Form
10-K”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. References to “Note” are to the notes included in
our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.
We
are a publicly traded biotechnology company pioneering the development of targeted therapies with the potential to deliver genetic medicines
to distal sites of disease. Our proprietary RedTail platform features an engineered enveloped oncolytic virus designed for systemic delivery
and targeting of metastatic sites. This advanced enveloped technology is intended to shield the virus from immune clearance, allowing
virotherapy to effectively reach tumor sites, induce tumor lysis, and deliver potent genetic medicine(s) to metastatic locations. We
expect to file an investigational new drug (“IND”) application for a Phase I trial byenter the endclinic in the first quarter of 20262027 with CLD-401, the first
compound from the RedTail platform, delivering IL-15 superagonist to the tumor microenvironment (“TME”).
CLD-401,
the first lead derived from the RedTail platform. CLD-401 is enveloped and overexpressed CD55 on its outer membrane. It is tropic for
tumor cells and, when replicating, expresses IL-15 superagonist at high concentrations in the tumor microenvironment. In animal models,
CLD-401 can be given systemically and clear metastatic sites in syngeneic tumor mouse models with demonstrated enhanced biological efficacy.
The combination of the RedTail virus with its genetic payload drives complete tumor eradication in the tumor models compared to the RedTail
virus alone. We believe that RedTail, given its systemic administration and targeting to metastatic sites and its delivery of genetic
medicines, represents a major advancement in the space of oncolytic virus in oncology. We are developing additional leads from
the RedTail
platform including compounds that simultaneously express a bispecific T-cell engagerCLD-501 (“TCE”anti-TROP2) and aCLD-502 T-cell(anti-EpCAM), activatorwhich co-express an in situ TCE and
asan wellIL-15 as compounds for use outside of oncology.superagonist.
Since
inception, we have incurred significant operating losses. Our net loss was $4.1$8.3 million for the six-month period ended MarchJune 31, 30,
2026. As of March
31,June 30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $145.7$149.9 million. We expect to continue to incur significant and
increasing expenses and operating
losses for the foreseeable future, as we advance our current and future product candidates through
preclinical and clinical development,
manufacture drug product and drug supply, seek regulatory approval for our current and future
product candidates, maintain and expand
our intellectual property portfolio, hire additional research and development and business
personnel and operate as a public company.
Based
on our operating plan, we believe we do not have sufficient cash on hand to support current operations for at least one year from the
date of issuance of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
We We
have concluded that this circumstance raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. See Note 1 to our
unaudited unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements. In addition, we will be required to raise additional capital through the issuance
of our
equity securities to support our operations which will have an ownership and economic dilutive effect to our current shareholders
who who
purchased their shares of common stock at prices above our current trading price, and such capital raising may adversely affect the
price price
of our common stock. Further, the sale of or the perception of a sale of a substantial number of our common stock by certain selling
securityholders pursuant to another registration statement filed with the SEC will adversely affect the price of our common stock due
to our limited trading volume, adversely affect the share price that we may obtain in future financings, and may adversely affect our
ability to conduct and complete future financings.
Reverse Stock Split
On June 12, 2026, our stockholders approved an amendment to our Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, to, at the discretion of the Board of Directors, to effect a reverse stock split with respect to our shares of issued and outstanding Common Stock, which consists of Voting Common Stock and Non-Voting Common Stock, at a ratio between 1-for-2 and 1-for-16 (the “Range”), with the ratio within such Range to be determined at the discretion of the Board. On July 30, 2026, we effected the reverse stock split of our outstanding shares of common stock at a ratio of 1-for-16. Our common stock commenced trading on a split-adjusted basis on July 31, 2026 under the existing symbol of “CLDI.
Financing Matters
On
March 5, 2026, we entered into an Amendment to Common Stock Purchase Warrants Agreement (the “Warrant Amendment”) with
certain investors that participated in the March Confidentially Marketed Public Offering described below, in connection with the
terms of certain of our outstanding common warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock (the “Existing Warrants”). As
originally issued, the Existing Warrants provided for the purchase of:
Per
the Warrant Amendment, the exercise price for each of such Existing Warrants was reduced to $0.50 per share, subject to further adjustment
as set forth in the Existing Warrants and any other document governing the terms thereunder. All other terms and conditions of the Existing
Warrants remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
On
March 6, 2026, we entered into an Underwriting Agreement with Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. (“Ladenburg”), the “Underwriter”,
in connection with the Offering of: (i) 2,278,731 Common Stock Units, which includes 1,575,000 Common Stock Units purchased pursuant
to the exercise, in full, of the Over-Allotment Option, sold to the public at a price of $0.50 per Common Stock Unit, and (ii) 9,815,900
pre-funded warrant units Pre-Funded Units, sold to the public at a price of $0.499 per Pre-Funded Unit, resulting in gross proceeds of
approximately $6.0 million, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other estimated offering expenses. For additional
discussion of this March Confidentially Marketed Public Offering, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Financing Activities”
below.
On
March 29, 2026, Mr. Allan J. Camaisa, a member of our Board of Directors (the “Board”), informed the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee of the Board that he intends to allow the term of his Director position on the Board to expire, which
expiration date is scheduled to be at the date of our 2026 annual stockholder meeting. Mr. Camaisa’s decision to allow his
Director term to expire did not result from any disagreement with us on any matter relating to our operations, policies or
practices. In connection with Mr. Camaisa’s decision, effective on the date of our 2026 annual stockholder meeting, the Board
reduced the size of the Board from six (6) to five (5) directors.
On
April 1, 2026, the Board on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, appointed Scott Leftwich, a Class
III director, to the Audit Committee of the Board effective immediately.
On
May 6, 2026, we issued a warrant
(“Warrant”) to an accredited investor to purchase up to 17,391,3041,086,957 unvested shares of
our common stock (“Common Stock”)
with an exercise price of $0.23$3.68 in a private placement transaction. The Warrant is
exercisable beginning on the date that is six months
from the issue date, and is subject to certain vesting conditions as described
further. The holder of the Warrant may from time to time
prior to July 8, 2026, agree to acquire, and we may agree to sell to such
holder, up to an aggregate of $4$4.0 million of Common Stock
in issuances registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).Act. The Warrant will
vest in
proportion to issuances described in the preceding sentence that are consummated. Neither the holder of the Warrant nor we have any
any obligation to agree to or consummate any such issuances.
On May 28, 2026, we amended and restated the Warrant to among other things: (i) condition the exercise of the Warrant and the issuance of the Common Stock upon exercise pursuant to the terms of the Warrant, to the receipt of the approval of our stockholders; (ii) increase the Minimum Vesting Acquisition Amount, as such term is defined in the Warrant, from $500,000 to $1,000,000; and (iii) to extend the Vesting Termination Date, as such term is defined in the Warrant, from July 8, 2026 to September 30, 2026;
New Facility Lease
On July 10, 2026, we entered into a new lease agreement (the “New Lease”) for approximately 9,038 rentable square feet of office and laboratory space located at 5580 Morehouse Drive, Suite 120, San Diego, California, with an initial term of 44 months commencing October 1, 2026, and expiring May 31, 2030, with one option to extend for an additional three years at the then-prevailing fair market rate. We will be required to make monthly base rental payments of approximately $52,000 per month for the first 12 months, with an annual 3% increase in such amount on each anniversary of the commencement date. We will also pay our share of operating expenses, property taxes and insurance, as well as a 3% management fee. We are required to deliver an irrevocable letter of credit of approximately $0.1 million within 10 calendar days of execution of the new lease.
Concurrently, we also entered into a Lease Termination Agreement with respect to our existing lease at 4475 Executive Drive, San Diego, California, which will terminate effective September 30, 2026 (the “Termination Date”), with no early termination fee payable. The Termination Agreement also reduces the remaining base rent payments due under the existing lease from June 1, 2026 through the Termination Date from approximately $118,000 per month to approximately $26,000 per month, and it also reduces the monthly estimated payment for Expenses, Taxes and insurance to a flat monthly fee of approximately $10,000 per month.
In connection with the Lease Termination Agreement, Mr. Camaisa entered into a Guarantee Termination Agreement to be effective on the Termination Date, pursuant to which, the Guarantee under the existing lease shall terminate and be of no further force or effect.
Appointment of Director
On June 17, 2026, our Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee appointed Dr. Corazon (Corsee) Sanders to serve as our Class III director, with a term expiring at our 2029 annual meeting of stockholders and until her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until her earlier death, resignation, retirement, disqualification, or removal. In addition, the Board appointed Dr. Sanders to serve as a member of the Audit Committee of the Board.
Research
and Development Expenses
We
track external research and development costs on a program-by-program basis beginning, with respect to each program, upon our internal
nomination of a candidate in that program for further preclinical and clinical development. External costs include fees paid to consultants,
contractors and vendors, including contract development and manufacturing organizations (“CDMOs”), and clinical research
organizations (“CROs”), in connection with our preclinical, clinical and manufacturing activities and license milestone payments
related to candidate development.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General
and administrative expenses include salaries and other compensation-related costs, including stock-based compensation, for personnel
in executive, finance and accounting, operations, and administrative roles. Other significant costs include professional service and
consulting fees including legal fees relating to intellectual property and corporate matters, accounting fees, and costs for
consultants consultants
utilized to supplement our personnel, insurance costs, travel costs, facility and office-related costs not included in
research and development
expenses and depreciation and amortization. We anticipate these expenses continuing and we also
anticipate continued expenses associated with being a public company, including costs for audit, legal, regulatory and tax-related
services related to compliance with the rules and regulations of the SEC, and listing standards applicable to companies listed on a
national securities exchange, director and officer insurance premiums, and investor relations costs.
In addition, if we obtain regulatory approval for any of our product candidates and do not enter into a third-party commercialization collaboration, we expect to incur significant expenses related to building a sales and marketing team to support product sales, marketing and distribution activities.
We
anticipate that our general and administrative expenses will increase in the future as our business expands to support expected growth
in research and development activities, including our future clinical programs. These increases will likely include increased costs related
to the hiring of additional personnel and fees to outside service providers, among other expenses. We also anticipate continued expenses
associated with being a public company, including costs for audit, legal, regulatory and tax-related services related to compliance with
the rules and regulations of the SEC, and listing standards applicable to companies listed on a national securities exchange, director
and officer insurance premiums, and investor relations costs. In addition, if we obtain regulatory approval for any of our product candidates
and do not enter into a third-party commercialization collaboration, we expect to incur significant expenses related to building a sales
and marketing team to support product sales, marketing and distribution activities.
Other
Income,Income (Expense), Net
Other
income,income (expense), net, primarily includes interest income, interest expense, and the changes in fair value of warrants and derivatives.
The The
changes in the fair value of these instruments are recorded in change in fair value of other liabilities and derivatives, and change
in fair value of other liabilities and derivatives – related party, included as a component of other income,income (expense), net, in
the the
unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Other
income,income (expense), net, for 2025, also includes grant income generated from a grant awarded to us by the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine
(“CIRM”)
in December 2022. Proceeds from the CIRM grant are recognized over the period necessary to match the related research
and development
expenses when it is probable that we have complied with the CIRM conditions and will receive the proceeds pursuant to
the milestones
defined in the grant as reimbursement of those expenditures. Any CIRM grant proceeds received in advance of having incurred
the related
research and development expenses are recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and recognized as grant
income on our
unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations when the related research and developments expenses are incurred.
Comparison
of Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025
The
following table summarizes our results of operations for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
Research
and Development Expenses
Research
and development expenses were substantially flat for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 wereat $2.6 millionmillion. andDuring $2.4the million,three
months respectively.ended The
$0.2June million30, increase2026, waswe primarily attributable torecognized an increase in drug manufacturing and preclinical expenses of $0.3$0.6 million, offset by a
decrease in rent
expenses of $0.1$0.3 million, and salaries and benefits of $0.1$0.2 million, partially offset by decrease inand regulatory consulting costs of $0.1 million when
$0.3compared million.to the same period in 2025.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General
and administrative expenses for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 were $1.6 million and $2.6$3.1 million, respectively. The
$1.0$1.5 million decrease during the three months ended June 30, 2026 was primarily due to a decrease in salaries and benefits of $0.6$1.1
million due to reduced headcount, legal expenses of $0.2 million, accounting expenses of $0.2$0.1 million,
and consulting costs of $0.1
million million,when andcompared rentto expensesthe ofthree $0.1months million.ended June 30, 2025.
Other
Income,Income (Expense), Net
Other
income,expense, net for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 were $0.1 million$5,000 and $3,000,$0.1 million, respectively. The $0.1 million increasedecrease
during the three months ended June 30, 2026 was primarily due to an increase in interest income and a decrease of interest expense
due to lower principal amounts owed on our debt.debt when compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025.
Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025
The following table summarizes our results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
Research and development expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 were $5.1 million and $5.0 million, respectively. The $0.1 million increase during the six months ended June 30, 2026 was primarily attributable to an increase in drug manufacturing and preclinical expenses of $0.9 million, partially offset by a decrease in consulting expenses of $0.5 million, rent expenses of $0.2 million, and salaries and benefits of $0.1 million when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025.
General and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 were $3.2 million and $5.7 million, respectively. The $2.5 million decrease during the six months ended June 30, 2026 was primarily due to a decrease in salaries and benefits of $1.7 million due to reduced headcount, accounting and audit fees of $0.3 million, rent expenses of $0.2 million, legal fees of $0.2 million, insurance expenses of $0.1 million, consulting expenses of $0.1 million, partially offset by an increase in public company expenses of $0.1 million when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 were $0.1 million in other income, net, and $0.1 million other expense, net, respectively. The $0.2 million increase during the six months ended June 30, 2026 primarily relates to a decrease in interest expense of $0.1 million and an increase in interest income of $0.1 million when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025.
As of June 30, 2026, we had a cash balance of $4.1 million and a restricted cash balance of $0.2 million. Our debt and liability obligations as of June 30, 2026 include $2.1 million in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities, $1.3 million in operating and finance lease liabilities and, $0.6 million in promissory notes maturing on July 1, 2027.
Sources
of Liquidity
As
of March 31, 2026, we had a cash balance of $6.6 million and restricted cash of $0.2 million. Our debt and liability obligations as of
March 31, 2026 include $2.3 million in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities, including related party amounts,
$1.4 million in operating lease liabilities, $0.6 million in promissory notes, $0.3 million in finance lease liabilities, and $0.1 million
in warrant liabilities, including related party amounts.
Financing
and Financing-Related Transactions During the Three Months Ended March 31, 2026
During
the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we undertookreceived certain financing and financing-related transactions. Approximatelyapproximately $5.1 million in
in net proceeds were received from the March 2026 confidentially marketed public offering.offering and $2.2 million in net proceeds from the At the Market Offering.
We may receive proceeds from the exercise of the 2,619,735 outstanding warrants if the holders elect to exercise such warrants. However, the exercise prices of a substantial portion of our outstanding warrants significantly exceed the current market price of our common stock. Accordingly, we do not expect the exercise of our warrants to be a material source of liquidity unless the market price of our common stock increases significantly above the applicable exercise prices. There can be no assurance that any warrants will be exercised, and we have not assumed the receipt of any such proceeds in our liquidity assessment.
Debt
Obligations
Calidi’s
outstanding debt obligations as of March 31, 2026, are as follows (in thousands):
As
of March 31, 2026, Calidi had outstanding warrants to purchase 49,440,138 shares of Common Stock, consisting of the following:
On
October 10, 2022, we entered into an Office Lease Agreement (the “San Diego Lease”) that serves as our principal executive
executive and administrative offices and laboratory facility. To secure and execute the San Diego Lease, Mr. Allan J. Camaisa,
former Chief Executive
Officer, provided a personal Guaranty of Lease of up to $0.9 million (the “Guaranty”) to the
lessor for our future performance
under the San Diego Lease agreement. As consideration for the Guaranty, we agreed
to pay Mr. Camaisa 10% of the Guaranty amount for the
first year of the San Diego Lease, and 5% per annum of the Guaranty amount
thereafter through the life of the lease, with all amounts
accrued and payable at the termination of the San Diego Lease or release
of Mr. Camaisa from the Guaranty by the lessor, whichever occurs
first. The amount due was partially settled in April 2025. The San
Diego Lease hashad an initial term of 4 years.
As described more fully in Recent Developments, on July 10, 2026, the Company entered into (i) a Lease Termination Agreement to terminate the San Diego Lease effective September 30, 2026 and (ii) a new lease agreement (the “New Lease”) for a different location effective October 1, 2026. Additionally, on July 10, 2026, Mr. Camaisa entered into a Guarantee Termination Agreement to be effective September 30, 2026.
We
further entered into separate license agreements with Northwestern University and City of Hope and the University of Chicago, wherein
we may be liable to make certain contingent payments, under certain conditions that are in our control, pursuant to the terms and conditions
conditions of the license agreements. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we do not believe it probable that we will incur these payments.
Other
commitments and contingencies include various operating and financing leases for equipment, office facilities, and other property containing
future minimum lease payments totaling $1.8 million and certain manufacturing and other supplier agreements with vendors principally
for manufacturing drug products for clinical trials and continuing the development of our programs totaling
$0.4 million.
Related
Party Transactions
Please
see Note 6 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for more information on our related party transactions.
Cash
Flow Summary for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025
CLDI insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
No Form 4 stock transactions in this period.
Well-known investors holding CLDI (13F)
None of the 59 investors we track reported a position in their latest 13F.