CLPR 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Clipper Realty Inc. · NYSE · Real Estate Investment Trusts · CIK 1649096 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
Largest changes
“On March 20, 2025, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee for the benefit of the registered holders of certain pass-through certificates issued by trusts that are the holders of the promissory mortgage notes secured by the 141 Livingston Street property, referred to as "Plaintiff,” filed a lawsuit against the Borrower, as well as us and our Operating Partnership subsidiary, as guarantors, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York. …”see in full comparison
Our rental revenue depends on entering into leases with and collecting rents from tenants. As of December 31,see in full comparison2024,2025, Kings County Court, the Human Resources Administration, and the Department of Environmental Protection, all of which are agencies of the City of New York,leasedoccupiedanallaggregate206,084 of548,580rentable square feet at 141 Livingston Street and terminated its lease and vacated all 342,496 rentable square feet of commercial space at our 250 Livingston Street. The commercialofficerentalpropertiesspace at 141 LivingstonStreetisandoccupied250subjectLivingstontoStreet,hold-over rent provisions in therentsleasefromthatwhichexpiredrepresentedon December 27, 2025. Our commercial leases with the City of New York comprised approximately 18% and 22% ofourtotal revenues for theyear-endedyears ended December 31,2024.2025 and 2024, respectively. We are also subject to covenants covering these leases in our loan agreements related to our commercial office properties located at 250 Livingston Street and 141 Livingston Street.Breaches of these covenants could result in defaults under the loan agreements.
“On March 18, 2025, we were notified by legal counsel to the servicer for the loan related to the 250 Livingston Street property that, due to the failure of our subsidiary, 250 Livingston Owner LLC, to cause all revenue generated by the 250 Livingston Street property to be deposited into the cash management account as required by the loan agreement related to the $125 million building mortgage loan, an event of default occurred under the $125 million building mortgage loan. …”see in full comparison
“On December 24, 2025, the Borrower, the Operating Partnership and we entered into the Loan Modification Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee for the benefit of the registered holders of certain commercial mortgage pass-through certificates related to the Loan (collectively, the “Lender”), to settle the ongoing litigation between the Lender, the Borrower, us and the Operating Partnership. The Agreement became effective on December 30, 2025. …”see in full comparison
“On December 18, 2025, the Borrower received a letter from the Special Servicer notifying the Borrower that it is in default under the Note and other Loan documents by virtue of, among other things, its failure to pay all amounts when due thereunder. The notice indicated that the Lender would take all such actions as it deems appropriate to protect its interest in the Loan and to collect the debt thereunder including, without limitation, seeking foreclosure and/or reconveyance of its security under the Loan documents. …”see in full comparison
“On December 18, 2025, the Company received a letter from the Special Servicer notifying the Company that it is in default under the Note and other Loan documents by virtue of, among other things, its failure to pay all amounts when due thereunder. The notice indicated that the Lender would take all such actions as it deems appropriate to protect its interest in the Loan and to collect the debt thereunder including, without limitation, seeking foreclosure and/or reconveyance of its security under the Loan documents. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (39)
WeOur dependdependency on two commercial leases with certain agencies of the City of New York (NYC), as a single government tenant in our office buildings, with one lease terminatinghaving terminated effective August 23, 20252025, and the other lease expiringhaving expired on December 27, 2025.2025 Ourand our inability to replace NYC as a tenant at rent rates comparable to the rates in the lease that terminatesterminated in August 2025 or to negotiateenter into a five-year extension of the lease expiringthat expired in December 2025 could cause a material adverse effect on us, including our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
Our rental revenue depends on entering into leases with and collecting rents from tenants. As of December 31, 2024,2025, Kings County Court, the Human Resources Administration, and the Department of Environmental Protection, all of which are agencies of the City of New York, leasedoccupied anall aggregate206,084 of 548,580rentable square feet at 141 Livingston Street and terminated its lease and vacated all 342,496 rentable square feet of commercial space at our 250 Livingston Street. The commercial officerental propertiesspace at 141 Livingston Streetis andoccupied 250subject Livingstonto Street,hold-over rent provisions in the rentslease fromthat whichexpired representedon December 27, 2025. Our commercial leases with the City of New York comprised approximately 18% and 22% of our total revenues for the year-endedyears ended December 31, 2024.2025 and 2024, respectively. We are also subject to covenants covering these leases in our loan agreements related to our commercial office properties located at 250 Livingston Street and 141 Livingston Street. Breaches of these covenants could result in defaults under the loan agreements.
250 Livingston Street Property
As of February 23, 2024, The City of New York, a municipal corporation acting through the Department of Citywide Administrative Services ("NYC”), notified us of its intention to terminate its lease at 250 Livingston Street effective August 23, 2025.2025, and they vacated the space on that date. The lease generally providesprovided for rent payments in the amount of $15.4 million per annum. We mayhave bebeen unable to replace NYC as a tenanttenant, orand we may continue to be unable to replace it with other commercial tenants at comparable rent rates,rates or at all, may incur substantial costs to improve the vacated space or may have to offer significant inducements to fill the space, all of which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow. In connection with the termination of the 250 Livingston Street lease, pursuant to the terms of the loan agreement related to $125 million building mortgage, we have established a cash management account for the benefit of the lender, into which we will be obligated to deposit all revenue generated by the building at 250 Livingston Street. All amounts remaining in such cash management account after the lender’s allocations set forth in the loan agreement will be disbursed to us once the tenant cure conditions are satisfied under the loan agreement. As of February 14, 2025, we are required to deposit into such cash management account approximately $5.7 million upon demand by the lender. If we are unable to replace the NYC lease at comparable rents, we may not be able to cure the conditions listed in the loan agreement. If the excess cash is not released to us, it could impact our available cash to fund corporate operations and pay dividends and distributions to our stockholders.
Our subsidiary, 250 Livingston Owner LLC (“Borrower”), entered into the Loan Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2019 (the “Loan Agreement”), with Citi Real Estate Funding Inc., related to a loan in the principal amount of $125.0 million (the “Loan”). The Loan is evidenced by certain promissory notes (the “Notes”) and secured by our 250 Livingston Street property in Brooklyn, New York (the “Property”). We and our Operating Partnership serve as guarantors of certain obligations under the Loan.
On March 18, 2025, we were notified by legal counsel to the servicer for the loan related to the 250 Livingston Street property that, due to the failure of our subsidiary, 250 Livingston Owner LLC, to cause all revenue generated by the 250 Livingston Street property to be deposited into the cash management account as required by the loan agreement related to the $125 million building mortgage loan, an event of default occurred under the $125 million building mortgage loan. The notice provided that if the 250 Livingston Owner LLC fails to cure the event of default, the lender may, among other things, accelerate the $125 million building mortgage loan and demand all amounts owing to the lender to be immediately payable, institute proceedings for the foreclosure of all liens securing the loan and sell the 250 Livingston Street Property, or file a lawsuit against the 250 Livingston owner LLC or the guarantors. As of May 12, 2025, we have complied with the lender’s requirement to have the deposits made by all tenants deposited directly into the cash management account. On May 8, 2025, we transferred $6.3 million to the cash management account to cover amounts owed prior to the activation of the cash management account. On May 15, 2025, legal counsel for the lender notified us that they allege that we are in default on the $125 million mortgage loan due to its allegation that we, as the guarantor, did not maintain a net worth of not less than $100 million as of December 31, 2024, as required under the loan agreement. We replied to the lender disputing such calculation and alleging that the lender did not calculate net worth in a reasonable manner and provided our lender with our own calculation of net worth that shows a net worth in excess of the required amount. On May 28, 2025, the lender replied to us concurring with us and notifying us that they agree that we are compliant with the $100 million requirement. On July 28, 2025, we were notified by legal counsel for the lender that they alleged that we were once again in default for failure to remit all revenue derived from 250 Livingston into the cash management account. We responded by disputing the allegations in May 8, 2025, letter and noting all rents from the tenants have been deposited into the cash management account.
All amounts remaining in such cash management account after the lender’s allocations set forth in the loan agreement will be disbursed to us if the tenant cure conditions are satisfied under the loan agreement.
If we are unable to replace the NYC lease at comparable rents, we may not be able to cure the conditions listed in the loan agreement, and it could impact our available cash to fund corporate operations and pay dividends and distributions to our stockholders.
On October 6, 2025, we failed to make our required deposit to the cash management account to fund the interest and tax escrow deposit for September 2025. We received notices of nonpayment on October 20, 2025, and November 12, 2025. The loan documents state that a failure to pay interest within five days of due date is an event of default. On November 12, 2025, we sent a letter to Midland requesting that the loan be immediately fully transferred to Special Servicing for potential loan modifications because the Borrower does not plan to continue to support the ongoing operating and debt service shortfall related to 250 Livingston Street property.
On December 18, 2025, the Borrower received a letter from the Special Servicer notifying the Borrower that it is in default under the Note and other Loan documents by virtue of, among other things, its failure to pay all amounts when due thereunder. The notice indicated that the Lender would take all such actions as it deems appropriate to protect its interest in the Loan and to collect the debt thereunder including, without limitation, seeking foreclosure and/or reconveyance of its security under the Loan documents. In accordance with the Loan documents, we are subject to default interest at a rate of an additional 5% per annum. We believe that, as of December 31, 2025, we owed approximately $3,643 in interest and default interest. There is no assurance that the Lender would not impose penalties or any other obligations on the Borrower in connection with this event of default.
On January 7, 2026, the Borrower received a letter from counsel for the Lender and the special servicer for the Lender, notifying the Borrower that it is in default under the Loan Agreement, the Note and other loan documents by virtue of, among other things, its failure to pay all amounts when due thereunder from October 6, 2025 through and including January 6, 2026. The letter indicated that the Lender’s counsel would assist the Lender in taking all such actions as it deems appropriate to protect its interest in the Loan and to collect the debt thereunder including, without limitation, seeking foreclosure and/or reconveyance of its security under the loan documents.
As previously disclosed, the Company is in the process of negotiating a Consent and Cooperation Agreement with the Lender for the sale of the Property, but there can be no assurance that such Consent and Cooperation Agreement will be consummated.
141 Livingston Street Property
The 141 Livingston Street lease expired on December 27, 2025. The Company and City of New York are continuing to work through the finalizing of a previously agreed five-year extension of its expired lease. There can be no assurance that the negotiations will conclude with an agreement. The expired lease at 141 Livingston Street provided for $10.3 million in rent per annum. The City of New York continues to occupy the space and is paying holdover rent in accordance with the terms of the expired lease. Those payments are the same as those in final term of the expired lease.
On January 2, 2025, we were notified that the loan servicing of the loan related to the 250 Livingston Street property was transferred, at our request, to LNR Partners (“LNR”) to serve as special servicer in order for us to engage in negotiations on a modification of our loan. On January 6, 2025, we and LNR signed a Pre-Negotiation Letter Agreement to discuss our request for a reduction in the loan. These negotiations continue and there can be no guarantee that they will conclude with an agreement.
TheIf 141we Livingstonare Street lease expires on December 27, 2025, and if NYC wereunable to decide not to renew or extend such lease on its stated termination date, pursuant tofinalize the terms of the lease,agreement, we would be at risk of not being able to replace NYC as a tenant, leasing the space below the current rates, incurring costs to improve the space or offer other inducements to fill the space, all of which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow. We and NYC are in the process of negotiating the terms of a five-year extension of the current lease upon its expiration in December 2025. There can be no assurance that the negotiations will conclude with an agreement.
Under the terms of the loan agreement, if we are not able to extend or replace the NYC lease at our 141 Livingston Street property for a minimum of a five-year term, we will be required to either fund a reserve account in the amount of $10,000 payable in equal monthly payments over the 18 months after lease expiration or deliver to the lender a letter of credit in the amount of $10,000.
If we are not able to extend or replace the NYC lease at our 141 Livingston Street property for a minimum of a five-year term, we will be required to either fund a reserve account in the amount of $10 million payable in equal monthly payments over the 18 months after lease expiration or deliver to the lender a letter of credit in the amount of $10 million On October 28, 2024, we received notice that, as of October 7, 2024, the servicing of the mortgage notes was transferred to a special servicer (the “"Special Servicer”) due to our alleged failure to make certain required payments under the loan agreement, including, but not limited to, the reserve deposit starting on July 7, 2024. The Special Servicer demanded that we pay (i) $2.2 million$2,200 of reserve payments into a reserve account immediately (for July-October 2024) and continued monthly payments of $555,555$555 for an additional 14 months, (ii) $1.2 million$1,200 of default interest and late charges through October 7, 2024, and (iii) an additional $10,417$10 per diem interest for each day thereafter.
On November 11, 2024, the Special Servicer notified the Borrower that, due to its alleged event of default under the Loan Agreement, as a result of the failure to make the payments described above, the mortgage notes have been accelerated, and all amounts under the loan agreement were due and payable. Such amounts include,included, but arewere not limited to, $100.0 million$100,000 principal amount of the mortgage notes, approximately $5.0 million$5,000 of default yield maintenance premium, $10.0 million$10,000 aggregate reserve deposit, and the above-described penalty default interest and penalties.
We believe that (i) we have made timely payments under the loan agreement, (ii) the servicer and the Special Servicer have misinterpreted the terms of the loan agreement requiring monthly reserve payments beginning on July 7, 2024, (iii) we have no current obligation to make such reserve payments under the loan agreement and (iv) we should not be obligated to pay the default interest and late charges. We and the Special Servicer have entered into a pre-negotiation agreement and as such are engaged in good faith discussions regarding the terms of the loan agreement related to the monthly reserve deposit, among other matters. However, if we are unable to resolve this matter in a manner favorable to us, the lender may also seek to exercise any of its other rights or remedies under the loan agreement.
On December 18, 2024, we received notice from the Special Servicer that due to its allegation that Clipperwe Realtyas (the “Guarantor”) did not maintain a net worth of not less than $100 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2023, respectively, as required under the loan agreement, we arewere in default on the loan. We replied to the Special Servicer disputing such calculation and alleging that the Special Servicer did not calculate net worth in a reasonable manner. We provided the Special Servicer with our own calculation of net worth that shows a net worth in excess of the required amount. We await a response from the Special Servicer.
On January 21, 2025, we received notice from the Special Servicer alleging that certain elements of our insurance on the building at 141 Livingston Street arewere not in compliance with the loan agreement requirements, including, but not limited to, due to a deductible in excess of what is permitted under the terms of the loan agreement and the use of an insurance carrier with a rating agency rating below that which is permitted under the terms of the loan agreement.
On March 12, 2025, we received a letter from counsel to the successor to the special servicer reaffirming the occurrence of alleged events of default under the loan agreement described above and demanding the establishment of a restricted account, a cash management account and a debt service account. In addition, the letter demanded that tenants of 141 Livingston Street be sent notices directing them to make lease payments to the cash management account.
We believe that we are not required to establish the foregoing accounts or send such notices to the tenants. However, if we are required to establish such accounts and deliver such notices, it could impact our available cash to fund corporate operations and pay dividends and distributions to our stockholders.
On March 20, 2025, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee for the benefit of the registered holders of certain pass-through certificates issued by trusts that are the holders of the promissory mortgage notes secured by the 141 Livingston Street property, referred to as "Plaintiff,” filed a lawsuit against the Borrower, as well as us and our Operating Partnership subsidiary, as guarantors, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York. Plaintiff demands, among other things, that (i) the 141 Livingston Street property be sold and the Plaintiff be paid the amounts due under the loan agreement, with interest thereon to the time of such payment, together with, among other items, the expenses of the sale, Plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees; (ii) Plaintiff be paid all rents and revenues of the 141 Livingston Street property as they become due and payable; (iii) a receiver be appointed to manage the 141 Livingston Street property, with power among other things to demand and recover payment from anyone who has received a distribution from the Borrower after any event of default; (iv) Plaintiff have such other and further relief as may be just and equitable; (v) guarantors pay to Plaintiff the amount of any losses or damages suffered or incurred by Plaintiff as the court may determine to be just and equitable and amounts owed under the guaranty. We believe that the claims set forth in this complaint are without merit and intend to vigorously defend against this lawsuit. On April 7, 2025, we filed an Affirmation in opposition to the motion of the Plaintiff for the appointment of a receiver and in support of defendants cross motion to dismiss the action and cancel notice of pendency with the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Kings. A hearing on the motions was scheduled for April 8, 2025, but it was adjourned until May 6, 2025. The Plaintiff submitted additional filings on April 29, 2025, and we submitted our replies on May 6, 2025. On May 13, 2025, the Court denied (i) the Plaintiff’s motion to appoint a receiver to manage the 141 Livingston Street property, "as Plaintiff’s likelihood of ultimately prevailing on its claims herein appears remote” and (ii) the Company’s cross motion to dismiss the lawsuit, "as Plaintiff’s contentions do raise a question of fact”. In April 2025, we and the NYC agreed to the terms of a five-year extension of the expired lease, with an option for the NYC to terminate the lease after two years with a prior six month notice. NYC has sent the lease to us to sign. On April 22, 2025, we sent the lease to the loan special servicer for approval in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement. On May 21, 2025 the special servicer approved the lease subject to certain conditions. We rejected the conditions that amongst other changes required us to change the terms of the cancellation provisions in the lease and make amendments to the loan documents to be in line with the lenders allegations in the above lawsuit. There can be no assurance that the lease will be approved or finalized. On June 11, 2025, the lender filed an appeal of the denial of the receiver. On June 23, 2025, the Lender filed an amended complaint seeking a declaratory judgment that its conditions for its consent to the lease were reasonable. On July 2, 2025, the lender filed a renewed motion for a temporary receiver. On July 11, 2025, the Company filed an answer with counterclaims, seeking among other things declaratory relief that the lenders conditions are unreasonable for the proposed lease renewal. On July 18, 2025, we filed opposition to the renewed receiver motion. On July 30, 2025, the judge heard arguments on the renewed motion for a temporary receiver. On July 31, 2025, the lender filed a motion to dismiss the Company’s counterclaims. The Company filed opposition on September 30, 2025, and the motion was scheduled for hearing on December 16, 2025. On September 30, 2025, the court denied the Plaintiff’s renewed motion for a receiver. The court ruled, however, that if the City of New York exercises its option to terminate early under the proposed lease extension, the Company will be required to pay $2,000 on the first day of each month thereafter until a total of $10,000 has been accumulated. Under this decision and order, failure of the Company to fund the reserve fund at that time would be grounds for the Lender to submit an order appointing a receiver to the court of endorsement. On October 28, 2025, the lender filed a notice of appeal of the court’s decision. On October 28, 2025, the lender filed a notice of appeal of the court’s decision. On October 27, 2025, the Civil Appeals Management Program("CAMP”) of the Appellate Division, Second Department New York State Court of Appeals conducted a mandatory conference in which the Company and the Plaintiff participated to attempt to reach a settlement of the pending litigation. Another settlement conference took place on November 13, 2025.
On December 24, 2025, the Borrower, the Operating Partnership and we entered into the Loan Modification Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee for the benefit of the registered holders of certain commercial mortgage pass-through certificates related to the Loan (collectively, the “Lender”), to settle the ongoing litigation between the Lender, the Borrower, us and the Operating Partnership. The Agreement became effective on December 30, 2025. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Borrower; provided a $10,000 renewal tenant reserve account letter of credit and paid fees of approximately $2,200 million to the special servicer and to counsel to the Lender, the Lender waived its claimed late charges and default interest, agreed to dismiss with prejudice the pending foreclosure actions, and approved the previously submitted five-year lease extension with the Property’s New York City tenant effective December 28, 2025.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, our portfolio consisted of nineeight revenue generating properties, eight of which generated revenues in 2024 – the Tribeca House properties, the Flatbush Gardens complex, the 141 Livingston Street property, the 250 Livingston Street property, the Aspen property, the 10 West 65th Street property, the Clover House property and the 1010 Pacific Street property, and the Dean Street Property which accounted for 28.2%,29.6%, 31.3%,34.0%, 11.1%,10.9%, 12.1%,8.1%, 4.8%,5.1%, 2.7%,5.6.%, 5.5%4.2% and 4.3%,1.3%, respectively, of our portfolio’s total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024.2025. On May 30, 2025, the Company completed the sale 10 West 65th Street property, which accounted for 1.2% of our revenue for the year-ended December 31, 2025. Our results of operations and cash available for distribution to our stockholders would be adversely affected if any of these properties were materially damaged or destroyed.
We may be unable to renew leases or lease currently vacant space or vacating space on favorable terms or at all as leases expire or terminate, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had approximately 65,696163,541 rentable square feet of vacant residential space (excluding leases signed but not yet commenced) at our operating properties, and leases representing approximately 69%72% of the square footage of residential space at the operating properties have or will expire during the year ending December 31, 20252026 (including month-to-month leases). As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had no342,296 rentable square feet of vacant commercial space,space and a further 206,084 rentable square feet of commercial space that is subject to the holdover provisions in an expired lease, and approximately 13,00011,000 rentable square feet of vacant retail space. We cannot assure you that expiring leases will be renewed or tenants will not exercise any early termination options or that our properties will be re-leased at net effective rental rates equal to or above the current average net effective rental rates As of FebruaryAugust 23, 2024,2025, NYC notified us of its intention to terminatevacated its lease at 250 Livingston Street effective August 23, 2025.Street. As of that date, 342,496 of rentable square feet of commercial space will beis available.
Additionally, the 206,084 square foot lease with the City of New York (“NYC”) at 141 Livingston Street property will expireexpired at December 27, 2025. We and the NYC are negotiating the terms of a five-year extension of the currentexpired lease. There can be no assurance that the negotiations will conclude with an agreement. NYC currently occupies the space under the holdover provisions in expired lease.
We engage in development and redevelopment activities with respect to our properties as we believe market conditions dictate. For example, in 2023 we completed the development of the 1010 Pacific Street property and planin to2025 developwe completed the development of the Dean Street property as fully amenitized residential rental buildings.property. We are also reviewing the regulatory, architectural and financial considerations regarding a residential square footage expansion at Flatbush Gardens; such further development would require significant capital investment.
Any of these actions could result in the termination of such tenants’ leases with us and the loss of rental revenue attributable to the terminated leases. In these events, we cannot assure you that such tenants will renew those leases or not exercise early termination options or that we will be able to re-lease spaces on economically advantageous terms or at all. For example, the City of New York has advised us that it will vacatevacated the 250 Livingston Street property in August 2025. The loss of rental revenues from our tenants and our inability to replace such tenants may adversely affect us, including our profitability, our ability to meet our debt and other financial obligations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
We are a party to various claims and routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business and are subject to government oversight and actions. Some of these claims and actions or othersother litigation to which we may be subject from time to time may result in defense costs, settlements, fines or judgments against us, some of which are not, or cannot be, covered by insurance. Payment of any such costs, settlements, fines or judgments that are not insured could have an adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations. Adverse developments in existing litigation claims legal proceedings or government investigations involving us or new claims or investigations could require us to establish litigation reserves, enter into unfavorable settlements or satisfy judgments for monetary damages for amounts in excess of current reserves, which could adversely affect our financial results. In addition, certain litigation or the resolution of certain litigation or investigations may affect the availability or cost of some of our insurance coverage, which could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flow, expose us to increased risks that would be uninsured, and/or adversely affect our ability to attract officers and directors. See Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies” of our consolidated financial statements included in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
All of our properties are owned indirectly by subsidiaries, in particularparticular, our LLC subsidiaries, and substantially all of our operations are conducted by our Operating Partnership. As a result, we depend on distributions and other payments from our Operating Partnership and subsidiaries in order to satisfy our financial obligations and make payments to our investors. The ability of our subsidiaries to make such distributions and other payments depends on their earnings and cash flow and may be subject to statutory or contractual limitations. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources — Property-Level Debt.” As an equity investor in our subsidiaries, our right to receive assets upon their liquidation or reorganization will be effectively subordinated to the claims of their creditors. To the extent that we are recognized as a creditor of such subsidiaries, our claims may still be subordinate to any security interest in, or other lien on, their assets and to any of such subsidiaries’ debt or other obligations that are senior to our claims.
We currently have, and expect to incur in the future, interest-bearing debt at rates that vary with market interest rates. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had approximately $140.0$148.0 million of variable rate indebtedness outstanding, for our Dean Street development property and our 10 West 65th Street property, which constitutes approximately 11.0%11.5% of total outstanding indebtedness as of such date, and although we have experienced increasesdecreases in the interest rates on such indebtedness, whichrates hasare increasedsubject to fluctuations and any increase in rates would increase our interest expense and adversely impactedimpact our results of operations and cash flows. Continued increases in interest rates would further increase our interest expense and increase the cost of refinancing existing indebtedness and of issuing new debt. The effect of prolonged interest rate increases could negatively impact our ability to service our indebtedness, make distributions and make acquisitions and develop properties.
On October 6, 2025, we failed to make our required deposit to the cash management account to fund the interest and tax escrow deposit for September 2025 related to the loan secured by our 250 Livingston Street Property. We received notices of nonpayment on October 20, 2025, and November 12, 2025. The loan documents state that a failure to pay interest within five days of due date is an event of default. On November 12, 2025, we sent a letter to Midland requesting that the loan be immediately fully transferred to Special Servicing for potential loan modifications because the Borrower does not plan to continue to support the ongoing operating and debt service shortfall related to 250 Livingston Street property. Although the Company is in the process of negotiating a Consent and Cooperation Agreement for the sale of the property, there can be no assurance that such Consent and Cooperation Agreement will be consummated.
On December 18, 2025, the Company received a letter from the Special Servicer notifying the Company that it is in default under the Note and other Loan documents by virtue of, among other things, its failure to pay all amounts when due thereunder. The notice indicated that the Lender would take all such actions as it deems appropriate to protect its interest in the Loan and to collect the debt thereunder including, without limitation, seeking foreclosure and/or reconveyance of its security under the Loan documents. The Company believes that, as of December 31, 2025, the Company owed approximately $3,643 in interest and default interest. There is no assurance that the Lender would not impose penalties or any other obligations on the Borrower in connection with this event of default.
On January 7, 2026, the Borrower received a letter from counsel for the Lender and the special servicer for the Lender, notifying the Borrower that it is in default under the Loan Agreement, the Note and other loan documents by virtue of, among other things, its failure to pay all amounts when due thereunder from October 6, 2025 through and including January 6, 2026. The letter indicated that the Lender’s counsel would assist the Lender in taking all such actions as it deems appropriate to protect its interest in the Loan and to collect the debt thereunder including, without limitation, seeking foreclosure and/or reconveyance of its security under the loan documents.
As previously disclosed, the Company is in the process of negotiating a Consent and Cooperation Agreement with the Lender for the sale of the Property, but there can be no assurance that such Consent and Cooperation Agreement will be consummated
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “10 West 65th Street”
Largest changes
“On March 20, 2025, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee for the benefit of the registered holders of certain pass-through certificates issued by trusts that are the holders of the promissory mortgage notes secured by the 141 Livingston Street property, referred to as "Plaintiff,” filed a lawsuit against the Borrower, as well as us and our Operating Partnership subsidiary, as guarantors, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York. …”see in full comparison
“On March 18, 2025, we were notified by legal counsel to the servicer for the loan related to the 250 Livingston Street property that, due to the failure of our subsidiary, 250 Livingston Owner LLC, to cause all revenue generated by the 250 Livingston Street property to be deposited into the cash management account as required by the loan agreement related to the $125 million building mortgage loan, an event of default occurred under the $125million building mortgage loan. …”see in full comparison
“On December 24, 2025, the Company entered into the Loan Modification Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee for the benefit of the registered holders of certain commercial mortgage pass-through certificates related to the Loan (collectively, the “Lender”), to settle the ongoing litigation between the Lender, the Borrower, the Company and the Operating Partnership. The Agreement became effective on December 30, 2025. …”see in full comparison
“On December 18, 2025, the Company received a letter from the Special Servicer notifying the Company that it is in default under the Note and other Loan documents by virtue of, among other things, its failure to pay all amounts when due thereunder. The notice indicated that the Lender would take all such actions as it deems appropriate to protect its interest in the Loan and to collect the debt thereunder including, without limitation, seeking foreclosure and/or reconveyance of its security under the Loan documents. …”see in full comparison
“There is $31,437 in mortgage debt secured by 10 West 65th Street as of December 31, 2024, in the form of a mortgage note to New York Community Bank (“NYCB”), entered into in connection with the acquisition of the property. The note matures on November 1, 2027. Through October 2022 the Company paid a fixed interest rate of 3.375% and thereafter was scheduled to pay at the prime rate plus 2.75%, subject to an option to fix the rate. On August 26, 2022 the Company and NYCB amended the note to replace prime plus 2.75% rate with SOFR plus 2.5% (7.88% at December 31, 2024). …”see in full comparison
“On October 6, 2025, the Company failed to make its required deposit to the cash management account to fund the interest and tax escrow deposit for September 2025. The Company received notices of nonpayment on October 20, 2025, and November 12, 2025. The loan documents state that a failure to pay interest within five days of due date is an event of default. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (76)
On May 30, 2025, the Company completed the sale of 10 West 65th Street in Manhattan, a 6-story residential building with approximately 76,000 square feet of residential rental GLA. for gross proceeds of $45,500. The Company incurred $1,900 in closing costs and paid $800 in accrued interest at closing. At closing, the Company repaid in full its $31,200 mortgage note (the “Mortgage”) with Flagstar Bank (“Flagstar”) (see note 4 below). The Company recorded a loss on the disposal of long-lived assets of $857 and a loss on impairment of long-lived assets of $33,780 during the year-ended December 31, 2025.
During 2024,2025, the Company’s residential properties continued to have elevated occupancy levels and experienced growth in rental rates, as a result of a robust rental market in the New York metro area. The average rental rate per square foot at the Tribeca House property at December 31, 20242025 was $82.52,$88.74, up from $77.70$82.52 at December 31, 2023.2024. At the Flatbush Garden property, average residential rent per square foot increased at December 31, 2024,2025, was $30.04,$32.20, up from $26.69$30.04 at December 31, 2023.2024. At the Clover House property, average residential rent per square foot at December 31, 2024,2025, was $85.91,$89.74, an increase from $80.93$85.91 at December 31, 2023. Urban office markets have also generally been negatively impacted as a result of the increase in remote working that began during the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to less demand for office space.2024.
Urban office markets have also generally been negatively impacted as a result of the increase in remote working that began during the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to less demand for office space.
AsSince ofAugust December23, 31, 2024,2025, the Company’s office properties had not been adversely affected from a rent perspective as a result of its long-term leases with the City of New York. However, As of February 23, 2024, the City of New York informed the Company of its intention to terminate the lease at 250 Livingston Street effectiveproperty Augusthas 23,been 2025.vacant. Additionally, asour we move forwardlease with the approaching expiration of the leaseNYC at 141 Livingston Streetexpired in December 2025, although NYC continues to occupy its office space and pays its rent in accordance with the terms of the expired lease. The Company and the City of New York are negotiating the terms of a five-year extension of their currentexpired lease.lease at 141 Livingston Street property. There can be no assurance that the negotiations will conclude with an agreement, and the Company is at risk of not replacing the City of New York as its tenant or not being able to replace it at comparable rents. See “- Liquidity and Capital Resources” below and Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors.”
WeDuring derivethe year ended December 31, 2025, we derived approximately 74%78% of our revenues from rents received from residents in our apartment rental properties and the remainder from commercial and retail rental customers. We believe that we have expertise in operating, renovating and repositioning our properties. As we grow, we will likely add personnel as necessary to provide outstanding customer service to our residents in order to maintain or increase occupancy levels at our apartment communities and to preserve the ability to increase rents. This is likely to result in an increase in our operating and general and administrative expenses over time.
A majority of the leases at our apartment communities are for approximately one-year terms, which, in a rising market, generally enables us to seek increased rents upon renewal of existing leases or commencement of new leases. This may offset the potential adverse effect of inflation or deflation on rental revenue, although residents may leave without penalty at the end of their lease terms for any reason and, in a falling market, may require us to receive decreased rents upon renewal of existing leases or commencement of new leases. Our ability to seek increased rents at our Flatbush Gardens property, and our Aspen property and a portion of our 10 West 65th Street property is limited, however, as a result of the rent stabilization laws and regulations of New York City, including the Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019 (“HSTP”), which was signed into law in New York in June 2019. These regulations generally limit rental increases that we can charge at our Flatbush Gardens property, our Aspen property and a portion of our Tribeca House and 10 West 65th Street property upon lease renewal; effective October 1, 2024,2025, such increases are 2.75%3.00% for a one-year lease and 5.25%4.50% for a two-year lease. The regulations also limit the maximum rent we can charge at our Flatbush Gardens property,property and our Aspen property and a portion of our 10 West 65th Street property on new leases. In addition to the HSTP regulation, at Flatbush Gardens the Company entered into a 40 year regulatory agreement under Article 11 of the Private Housing Finance Law with the New York City Department Housing Preservation and Development (the “Article 11 Agreement”). This agreement required us to commit to maintaining rents within existing area medium income groups. In exchange, the Company is eligible to receive incremental rental assistance under section 610 of the Private Housing Financing Law for tenants receiving government rental assistance. The Section 610 rental assistance is paid by the government the City of New York as incremental rent above and beyond the base rent paid by the tenant. At our Aspen property, the residential units are subject to regulations established by the HDC, under which there are no rental restrictions on approximately 55% of the units and low- and middle-income restrictions on approximately 45% of the units. There are no rent stabilization restrictions at our Tribeca House properties, our 250 Livingston Street property, our Clover House property and a portion of our 10 West 65th Street property. However, they may be impacted by the April 2024 New York “Good-Cause eviction” law. Additionally, our newest assets, our 1010 Pacific property and our Dean Street property are beneficiaries of a 421(a) Tax Incentive in which the properties received a 35-year tax abatement, partial in the final 10-year phase out period, in exchange for setting aside 30% of the units for affordable housing.
The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. A property’s value is impaired if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property. To the extent impairment has occurred, a write-down is recorded and measured by the amount of the difference between the carrying value of the asset and the fair value of the asset. Management of the Company does not believe that any of its properties within the portfolio are impairedimpaired, other than the impairment of 10 West 65th Street described in note 10, as of December 31, 2024.2025. On May 30, 2025, the Company completed the sale of 10 West 65th Street in Manhattan, a 6-story residential building with approximately 76,000 square feet of residential rental GLA for gross proceeds of $45,500. The Company recorded a loss on impairment of long-lived assets of $33,780 in the year ended December 31, 2025 on 10 West 65th Street.
Tenant and other receivables are comprised of amounts due for monthly rents and other charges less allowance for doubtful accounts. AsIn describedaccordance more fully under Revenue Recognition below, in the first quarter of 2022 the Company adoptedwith Accounting Standards Codification (“"ASC”) 842 “Leases"Leases,” which replaced guidance under ASC 840 and provided for transition from balances at December 31, 2021. In accordance with ASC 842, the Company performsperformed a detailed review of amounts due from tenants to determine if accounts receivable balances and future lease payments were probable of collection, writeswrote off receivables not probable of collection and recordsrecorded a general reserve against revenues for receivables probable of collection for which a loss can be reasonably estimated. If management determines that the tenant receivable is not probable of collection it is written off against revenues. In addition, the Company records a general reserve under ASC 450.
Deferred lease costs consist of fees incurred to initiate and renew operating leases. Lease costs are being amortized using the straight-line method over the terms of the respective leases.
Deferred lease costs consist of fees incurred to initiate and renew operating leases. Lease costs are being amortized using the straight-line method over the terms of the respective leases. Deferred financing costs represent commitment fees, legal and other third-party costs associated with obtaining financing. These costs are amortized over the term of the financing and are recorded in interest expense in the combined financial statements. Unamortized deferred financing costs are expensed when the associated debt is refinanced or repaid before maturity. Costs incurred in seeking financing transactions which do not close are expensed in the period the financing transaction is terminated.
As of December 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024, there were 6,156,860 and 5,615,299 long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”) units outstanding, respectively, with a weighted average grant date fair value of $6.84 and $7.06 per unit, respectively. As of December 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024, there were $15,678 and $19,945, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under share incentive plans. As of December 31, 2025, the weighted-average period over which the unrecognized compensation expense will be recorded is approximately three and a half years.
In March 2025, the Company granted employees and non-employee directors 345,561 and 196,000 LTIP units, respectively, with a weighted-average grant date value of $4.54 per unit. The grants vesting period ranges from up to one year for those granted to the non-employee directors and from one to 2.5 years to those granted to employees as 2024 bonus and long-term incentive compensation.
In March 2024, the Company granted employees and non-employee directors 320,172 and 181,602 LTIP units, respectively, with a weighted-average grant date value of $4.90 per unit. The grants vesting period range from up to one year for those granted to the non-employee directors and from one to 2.5 years to those granted to employees as 2023 bonus and long-term incentive compensation.
In December 2024, the Company granted employees and a non-employee director 1,443,947 and 360,987 LTIP units, respectively, with a weighted-average grant date value of $4.46 per unit. The grants vest ratably over the a 10-year period and were a special reward related to the completion of certain elements of the Article 11 transaction at the Company’s Flatbush Gardens property.
At the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of the Company held on June 18, 2025, the stockholders of the Company approved the 2025 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”) and the 2025 Non-Employee Director Plan (the “Non-Employee Director Plan”). The Omnibus Plan replaced the 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan, and the Company ceased granting any new awards under the 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan. A total of 7,800,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance under the Omnibus Plan. The Non-Employee Director Plan replaced the 2015 Non-Employee Director Plan, and the Company ceased granting any new awards under the 2015 Non-Employee Director Plan. A total of 3,000,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance under the Non-Employee Director Plan.
The dollar amounts in the narrative disclosure below are in thousands, other than the base rent per square foot figures. The discussion below compares amounts in 2024,2025 to 2024 amounts, excluding 1010Dean Pacific,Street toand 202310 amounts.West 65th Street properties.
Revenue. Residential rental income increased to $103,422$115,122 for the year ended December 31, 2025, from $105,833 for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $96,602 for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily, due to increases in rental rates. For example, base rent per square foot increased at the Tribeca House property to $88.74 at December 31, 2025, from $82.52 at December 31, 2024, from $77.70 at December 31, 2023 and base rent per square foot increased at the Clover House property to $89.74 at December 31, 2025, from $85.91 at December 31, 2024, fromand $80.93base rent per square foot increased at the Flatbush Gardens to $32.20 at December 31, 2023.2025, from $30.04 at December 31, 2024.
Commercial rental income increaseddecreased to $38,836$34,331 for the year ended December 31, 2025, from $38,888 for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $38,465 for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily due to increased escalationdecreased billings at the 250 Livingston Street property.property as a result of the termination of the City of New York lease in August 2025.
Real estate taxes and insurance. Real estate taxes and insurance expenses decreasedincreased to $29,790$29,789 for the year ended December 31, 2025, from $28,670 for the year ended December 31, 2024, fromdue $31,591to higher real estate taxes at our Aspen and at both our Livingston Street office properties and overall higher insurance premiums for the yearrest ended December 31, 2023, due to the real estate tax exemption at Flatbush Gardens that began July 1, 2023, partially offset by increased property taxes and insurance acrossof the portfolio .
General and administrative. General and administrative expenses increased to $13,731$15,122 for the year ended December 31, 2025, from $13,762 for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $12,929 for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily due to higher payrollLTIP costsamortization, partially offset by lower accountingprofessional fees in relation to the separation from our prior auditor in 2023.fees.
Transaction pursuit costs. Transaction pursuit costs of $357 in 2023 primarily reflect costs related to the Article 11 Agreement and an abandoned acquisition.
Litigation settlement. Litigation settlement costs of $269 related to additional costs of litigation at the Tribeca House property primarily settled in 2022.
Interest expense, net. Interest expense, net, increased to $41,943$47,290 for the year ended December 31, 20242025 from $41,854$44,569 for the year ended December 31, 2023,2024, primarily due to lowerthe capitalizedaccrual of default interest as a result of completion of development ofon the 1010250 PacificLivingston propertyloan that is in the second quarter of 2023.default.
Loss on modification/extinguishment of debt. Loss on the extinguishment of debt in 20232025 consists of costs related to the earlyLoan terminationmodification of our construction loanagreement at 1010141 Pacific including the acceleration of the remaining unamortized loan costs from the prior loan.Livingston.
Net loss. As a result of the foregoing, net loss decreasedincreased to $5,205$11,824 for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, from $13,083$4,706 for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had $1,275.4 million$1,277,521 of indebtedness (net of unamortized issuance costs) secured by our properties, $19.9 million$30,815 of cash and cash equivalents, and $18.2 million$27,339 of restricted cash. See Note 4 “Notes Payable” of the accompanying “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for a discussion of the Company’s property-level debt.
Our short-term liquidity needs will primarily be to fund operating expenses, recurring capital expenditures, property taxes and insurance, interest and scheduled debt principal payments, general and administrative expenses, and distributions to stockholders and unit holders. We generally expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements through net cash provided by operations and cash on hand, and we believe we will have sufficient resources to meet our short-term liquidity requirements Our principal long-term liquidity needs will primarily be to fund additional property acquisitions, major renovation and upgrading projects, and debt payments and retirements at maturity. We do not expect that net cash provided by operations will be sufficient to meet all of these long-term liquidity needs. We anticipate meeting our long-term liquidity requirements by using cash as an interim measure and funds from public and private equity offerings and long-term secured and unsecured debt offerings. The Company sold its property at 10 West 65th Street during the year ended December 31, 2025, and was able to net approximately $13,000 in proceeds from such sale that are included in its cash balances at December 31, 2025. Additionally, the Company refinanced its existing construction loan at its Dean Street property with a maximum of $160,000 bridge loan, of which $141,750 was drawn at closing, an additional $6,250 was subsequently drawn and the potential to draw additional amounts that can be used for general corporate purposes.
Our short-term liquidity needs will primarily be to fund operating expenses, recurring capital expenditures, property taxes and insurance, interest and scheduled debt principal payments, general and administrative expenses, and distributions to stockholders and unit holders. We generally expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements through net cash provided by operations and cash on hand, and we believe we will have sufficient resources to meet our short-term liquidity requirements.
Our principal long-term liquidity needs will primarily be to fund additional property acquisitions, major renovation and upgrading projects, and debt payments and retirements at maturity. We do not expect that net cash provided by operations will be sufficient to meet all of these long-term liquidity needs. We anticipate meeting our long-term liquidity requirements by using cash as an interim measure and funds from public and private equity offerings and long-term secured and unsecured debt offerings.
As of FebruaryAugust 23, 2024,2025, The City of New York, a municipal corporation acting through the Department of Citywide Administrative Services ("NYC”), notifiedvacated usthe ofspace itsit intention to terminate its leaseoccupied at 250 Livingston Street effective August 23, 2025.Street. The lease generally providesprovided for rent payments in the amount of $15,400$15.4 million per annum. We may be unable to replace NYC as a tenant or unable to replace it with other commercial tenants at comparable rent rates, may incur substantial costs to improve the vacated space or may have to offer significant inducements to fill the space, all of which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow. In connection with the termination of the 250 Livingston Street lease, pursuant to the terms of the loan agreement related to $125,000 building mortgage, we have established a cash management account for the benefit of the lender, into which we will be obligated to deposit all revenue generated by the building at 250 Livingston Street. All amounts remaining in such cash management account after the lender’s allocations set forth in the loan agreement will be disbursed to us once the tenant cure conditions are satisfied under the loan agreement. As of February 14, 2025, we are required to deposit into such cash management account approximately $5,684 upon demand by the lender. If we are unable to replace the NYC lease at comparable rents, we may not be able to cure the conditions listed in the loan agreement. If the excess cash is not released to us, it could impact our available cash to fund corporate operations and pay dividends and distributions to our stockholders.
On March 18, 2025, we were notified by legal counsel to the servicer for the loan related to the 250 Livingston Street property that, due to the failure of our subsidiary, 250 Livingston Owner LLC, to cause all revenue generated by the 250 Livingston Street property to be deposited into the cash management account as required by the loan agreement related to the $125 million building mortgage loan, an event of default occurred under the $125million building mortgage loan. The notice provided that if the 250 Livingston Owner LLC fails to cure the event of default, the lender may, among other things, accelerate the $125 million building mortgage loan and demand all amounts owing to the lender to be immediately payable, institute proceedings for the foreclosure of all liens securing the loan and sell the 250 Livingston Street Property, or file a lawsuit against the 250 Livingston owner LLC or the guarantors. As of May 12, 2025, we have complied with the lender’s requirement to have the deposits made by all tenants deposited directly into the cash management account. On May 8, 2025, we transferred $6.3million to the cash management account to cover amounts owed prior to the activation of the cash management account. On May 15, 2025, legal counsel for the lender notified us that they allege that we are in default on the $125 million mortgage loan due to its allegation that we, as the guarantor, did not maintain a net worth of not less than $100 million as of December 31, 2024, as required under the loan agreement. We replied to the lender disputing such calculation and alleging that the lender did not calculate net worth in a reasonable manner and provided our lender with our own calculation of net worth that shows a net worth in excess of the required amount. On May 28, 2025, the lender replied to us concurring with us and notifying us that they agree that we are compliant with the $100 million requirement. On July 28, 2025, we were notified by legal counsel for the lender that they alleged that we were once again in default for failure to remit all revenue derived from 250 Livingston into the cash management account. We responded by disputing the allegations in May 8, 2025, letter and noting all rents from the tenants have been deposited into the cash management account.
All amounts remaining in such cash management account after the lender’s allocations set forth in the loan agreement will be disbursed to us if the tenant cure conditions are satisfied under the loan agreement.
If we are unable to replace the NYC lease at comparable rents, we may not be able to cure the conditions listed in the loan agreement, and it could impact our available cash to fund corporate operations and pay dividends and distributions to our stockholders.
On October 6, 2025, the Company failed to make its required deposit to the cash management account to fund the interest and tax escrow deposit for September 2025. The Company received notices of nonpayment on October 20, 2025, and November 12, 2025. The loan documents state that a failure to pay interest within five days of due date is an event of default. On November 12, 2025, the Company sent a letter to Midland requesting that the loan be immediately fully transferred to Special Servicing for potential loan modifications because the Borrower does not plan to continue to support the ongoing operating and debt service shortfall related to 250 Livingston Street property. Although the Company is in the process of negotiating a Consent and Cooperation Agreement for the sale of the property, there can be no assurance that such Consent and Cooperation Agreement will be consummated.
On December 18, 2025, the Company received a letter from the Special Servicer notifying the Company that it is in default under the Note and other Loan documents by virtue of, among other things, its failure to pay all amounts when due thereunder. The notice indicated that the Lender would take all such actions as it deems appropriate to protect its interest in the Loan and to collect the debt thereunder including, without limitation, seeking foreclosure and/or reconveyance of its security under the Loan documents. The Company believes that, as of December 31, 2025, the Company owed approximately $3,643 in interest and default interest. There is no assurance that the Lender would not impose penalties or any other obligations on the Borrower in connection with this event of default.
On January 7, 2026, the Borrower received a letter from counsel for the Lender and the special servicer for the Lender, notifying the Borrower that it is in default under the Loan Agreement, the Note and other loan documents by virtue of, among other things, its failure to pay all amounts when due thereunder from October 6, 2025 through and including January 6, 2026. The letter indicated that the Lender’s counsel would assist the Lender in taking all such actions as it deems appropriate to protect its interest in the Loan and to collect the debt thereunder including, without limitation, seeking foreclosure and/or reconveyance of its security under the loan documents.
As previously disclosed, the Company is in the process of negotiating a Consent and Cooperation Agreement with the Lender for the sale of the Property, but there can be no assurance that such Consent and Cooperation Agreement will be consummated.
On January 2, 2025, we were notified that the loan servicing of the loan related to the 250 Livingston Street property was transferred, at our request, to LNR Partners (“LNR”) to serve as special servicer in order for us to engage in negotiations on a modification of our loan. On January 6, 2025, we and LNR signed a Pre-Negotiation Letter Agreement to discuss our request for a reduction in the loan. These negotiations continue and there can be no guarantee that they will conclude with an agreement. On October 10, 2024, the Company guaranteed an agreement between the Company's subsidiary, 250 Livingston Owner LLC, and IronHound Management Company LLC, whose principal is the Company's director Roberto Verrone, to provide consulting services regarding the loan related to the 250 Livingston Street property. The initial fee paid upon the agreement is $125 and the agreement also includes restructuring and other fees payable upon certain loan modifications. The arrangement was approved by an independent committee of the Company’s board of directors.
The 141 Livingston Street lease expired on December 27, 2025. The Company and City of New York are continuing to work through the finalizing of a previously agreed five-year extension of its expired lease. There can be no assurance that the negotiations will conclude with an agreement. The expired lease at 141 Livingston Street provides for $10,300 million in rent per annum. The City of New York continues to occupy the space and is paying holdover rent in accordance with the terms of the expired lease. Those payments are the same as those in final term of the expired lease.
TheIf 141we Livingstonare Street lease expires on December 27, 2025, and if NYC wereunable to decide not to renew or extend such lease on its stated termination date, pursuant tofinalize the terms of the lease,agreement, we would be at risk of not being able to replace NYC as a tenant, leasing the space below the current rates, incurring costs to improve the space or offer other inducements to fill the space, all of which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow. We and NYC are in the process of negotiating the terms of a five-year extension of the current lease upon its expiration in December 2025. There can be no assurance that the negotiations will conclude with an agreement.
Our subsidiary, 141 Livingston Owner LLC (the “Borrower”) and Citi Real Estate Funding Inc. entered into the loan agreement related to a $100,000 loan. The loan is evidenced by promissory mortgage notes and secured by the 141 Livingston Street property. We and our Operating Partnership subsidiary serve as limited guarantors of certain obligations under the loan, including those related to the reserve monthly deposit discussed below.
If we are not able to extend or replace the NYC lease at our 141 Livingston Street property for a minimum of a five-year term, we will be required to either fund a reserve account in the amount of $10,000 payable in equal monthly payments over the 18 months after lease expiration or deliver to the lender a letter of credit in the amount of $10,000 On October 28, 2024, we received notice that, as of October 7, 2024, the servicing of the mortgage notes was transferred to a special servicer (the “"Special Servicer”) due to our alleged failure to make certain required payments under the loan agreement, including, but not limited to, the reserve deposit starting on July 7, 2024. The Special Servicer demanded that we pay (i) $2,200 of reserve payments into a reserve account immediately (for July-October 2024) and continued monthly payments of $555 for an additional 14 months, (ii) $1.2 million$1,200 of default interest and late charges through October 7, 2024, and (iii) an additional $10$10,417 per diem interest for each day thereafter (an additional $1,356 as of February 14, 2025).thereafter.
On November 11, 2024, the Special Servicer notified the Borrower that, due to its alleged event of default under the Loan Agreement, as a result of the failure to make the payments described above, the mortgage notes have been accelerated, and all amounts under the loan agreement were due and payable. Such amounts include,included, but arewere not limited to, $100,000 principal amount of the mortgage notes, approximately $5,000 of default yield maintenance premium, $10,000 aggregate reserve deposit, and the above-described penalty default interest and penalties.
We believe that (i) we have made timely payments under the loan agreement, (ii) the servicer and the Special Servicer have misinterpreted the terms of the loan agreement requiring monthly reserve payments beginning on July 7, 2024, (iii) we have no current obligation to make such reserve payments under the loan agreement and (iv) we should not be obligated to pay the default interest and late charges. We and the Special Servicer have entered into a pre-negotiation agreement and as such are engaged in good faith discussions regarding the terms of the loan agreement related to the monthly reserve deposit, among other matters. However, if we are unable to resolve this matter in a manner favorable to us, the lender may also seek to exercise any of its other rights or remedies under the loan agreement.
On December 18, 2024, we received notice from the Special Servicer that due to its allegation that Clipperwe Realtyas (the “Guarantor”) did not maintain a net worth of not less than $100,000$100 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2023, respectively, as required under the loan agreement, we arewere in default on the loan. We replied to the Special Servicer disputing such calculation and alleging that the Special Servicer did not calculate net worth in a reasonable manner. We provided the Special Servicer with our own calculation of net worth that shows a net worth in excess of the required amount. We await a response from the Special Servicer.
On January 21, 2025, we received notice from the Special Servicer alleging that certain elements of our insurance on the building at 141 Livingston Street arewere not in compliance with the loan agreement requirements, including, but not limited to, due to a deductible in excess of what is permitted under the terms of the loan agreement and the use of an insurance carrier with a rating agency rating below that which is permitted under the terms of the loan agreement.
On March 12, 2025, we received a letter from counsel to the successor to the special servicer reaffirming the occurrence of alleged events of default under the loan agreement described above and demanding the establishment of a restricted account, a cash management account and a debt service account. In addition, the letter demanded that tenants of 141 Livingston Street be sent notices directing them to make lease payments to the cash management account.
We believe that we are not required to establish the foregoing accounts or send such notices to the tenants. However, if we are required to establish such accounts and deliver such notices, it could impact our available cash to fund corporate operations and pay dividends and distributions to our stockholders.
On March 20, 2025, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee for the benefit of the registered holders of certain pass-through certificates issued by trusts that are the holders of the promissory mortgage notes secured by the 141 Livingston Street property, referred to as "Plaintiff,” filed a lawsuit against the Borrower, as well as us and our Operating Partnership subsidiary, as guarantors, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York. Plaintiff demands, among other things, that (i) the 141 Livingston Street property be sold and the Plaintiff be paid the amounts due under the loan agreement, with interest thereon to the time of such payment, together with, among other items, the expenses of the sale, Plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees; (ii) Plaintiff be paid all rents and revenues of the 141 Livingston Street property as they become due and payable; (iii) a receiver be appointed to manage the 141 Livingston Street property, with power among other things to demand and recover payment from anyone who has received a distribution from 141 Borrower after any event of default; (iv) Plaintiff have such other and further relief as may be just and equitable; (v) guarantors pay to Plaintiff the amount of any losses or damages suffered or incurred by Plaintiff as the court may determine to be just and equitable and amounts owed under the guaranty. We believe that the claims set forth in this complaint are without merit and intend to vigorously defend against this lawsuit. On April 7, 2025, we filed an Affirmation in opposition to the motion of the Plaintiff for the appointment of a receiver and in support of defendants cross motion to dismiss the action and cancel notice of pendency with the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Kings. A hearing on the motions was scheduled for April 8, 2025, but it was adjourned until May 6, 2025. The Plaintiff submitted additional filings on April 29, 2025, and we submitted our replies on May 6, 2025. On May 13, 2025, the Court denied (i) the Plaintiff’s motion to appoint a receiver to manage the 141 Livingston Street property, "as Plaintiff’s likelihood of ultimately prevailing on its claims herein appears remote” and (ii) the Company’s cross motion to dismiss the lawsuit, "as Plaintiff’s contentions do raise a question of fact”. In April 2025, we and the NYC agreed to the terms of a five-year extension of the then current lease, with an option for the NYC to terminate the lease after two years with a prior six month notice. NYC has sent the lease to us to sign. On April 22, 2025, we sent the lease to the loan special servicer for approval in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement. On May 21, 2025 the special servicer approved the lease subject to certain conditions. We rejected the conditions that amongst other changes required us to change the terms of the cancellation provisions in the lease and make amendments to the loan documents to be in line with the lenders allegations in the above lawsuit. There can be no assurance that the lease will be approved or finalized. On June 11, 2025, the lender filed an appeal of the denial of the receiver. On June 23, 2025, the Lender filed an amended complaint seeking a declaratory judgment that its conditions for its consent to the lease were reasonable. On July 2, 2025, the lender filed a renewed motion for a temporary receiver. On July 11, 2025, the Company filed an answer with counterclaims, seeking among other things declaratory relief that the lenders conditions are unreasonable for the proposed lease renewal. On July 18, 2025, we filed opposition to the renewed receiver motion. On July 30, 2025, the judge heard arguments on the renewed motion for a temporary receiver. On July 31, 2025, the lender filed a motion to dismiss the Company’s counterclaims. The Company filed opposition on September 30, 2025, and the motion was scheduled for hearing on December 16, 2025. On September 30, 2025, the court denied the Plaintiff’s renewed motion for a receiver. The court ruled, however, that if the City of New York exercises its option to terminate early under the proposed lease extension, the Company will be required to pay $2,000 on the first day of each month thereafter until a total of $10,000 has been accumulated. Under this decision and order, failure of the Company to fund the reserve fund at that time would be grounds for the Lender to submit an order appointing a receiver to the court of endorsement. On October 28, 2025, the lender filed a notice of appeal of the court’s decision. On October 28, 2025, the lender filed a notice of appeal of the court’s decision. On October 27, 2025, the Civil Appeals Management Program("CAMP”) of the Appellate Division, Second Department New York State Court of Appeals conducted a mandatory conference in which the Company and the Plaintiff participated to attempt to reach a settlement of the pending litigation. Another settlement conference took place on November 13, 2025.
On December 24, 2025, the Company entered into the Loan Modification Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee for the benefit of the registered holders of certain commercial mortgage pass-through certificates related to the Loan (collectively, the “Lender”), to settle the ongoing litigation between the Lender, the Borrower, the Company and the Operating Partnership. The Agreement became effective on December 30, 2025. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company provided a $10,000 renewal tenant reserve account letter of credit and paid fees of approximately $2,200 to the special servicer and to counsel to the Lender, the Lender waived its claimed late charges and default interest, agreed to dismiss with prejudice the pending foreclosure actions, and approved the previously submitted five-year lease extension with the Property’s New York City tenant effective December 28, 2025.
10 West 65th Street
On May 30, 2025, in connection with the Sale of the 10 West 65 street property, the Company repaid in full the $31.200 million 2017 acquisition mortgage note (the “Mortgage”) to Flagstar Bank (“Flagstar”). In addition to the Mortgage repayment, the Company paid $0.8 million in accrued interest through the payoff date. Upon repayment of the Mortgage, Flagstar released $1.1 million in previously deposited property tax escrow and other debt reserves to the Company. The Company did not incur any penalties related to the prepayment of the Mortgage.
There is $84,500 in mortgage debt secured by 1010 Pacific Street as of December 31, 2025, with Citi Real Estate Funding Inc., a New York corporation, and Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., a national banking association, as the lenders, pursuant to the loan agreement dated as of October 1, 2025. The Loan has a maturity date of October 6, 2030 and bears interest at a 5.73% rate per annum.
There is $31,437 in mortgage debt secured by 10 West 65th Street as of December 31, 2024, in the form of a mortgage note to New York Community Bank (“NYCB”), entered into in connection with the acquisition of the property. The note matures on November 1, 2027. Through October 2022 the Company paid a fixed interest rate of 3.375% and thereafter was scheduled to pay at the prime rate plus 2.75%, subject to an option to fix the rate. On August 26, 2022 the Company and NYCB amended the note to replace prime plus 2.75% rate with SOFR plus 2.5% (7.88% at December 31, 2024). The note required interest-only payments through November 2019, and monthly principal and interest payments thereafter based on a 30-year amortization schedule. We have the option to prepay all (but not less than all) of the unpaid balance of the note prior to the maturity date, subject to certain prepayment premiums, as defined.
There is $80,000 in mortgage debt secured by 1010 Pacific Street as of December 31, 2024, in the form of two mortgage notes to Valley National Bank. There is a $60,000 note which has an annual interest rate of 5.55% and a second note of $20,000 with an annual interest rate of 6.37%. The total borrowing of $80,000 has a term of twenty-four months and matures on September 15, 2025. The Company has the option to prepay in full, or in part, the unpaid balance of the note prior to the maturity date.
On May 2, 2025, the Company entered into the Multifamily Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”), dated as of May 2, 2025 and the Mezzanine Multifamily Loan and Security Agreement (the “Mezzanine Loan Agreement” and together with the Loan Agreement, the “New Loan Agreements”) with MF1 Capital, a company not affiliated with the Company, dated as of May 2, 2025.
The Loan Agreement provides for $115,000 and the Mezzanine Loan Agreement provides for the $26,750 loan to Dean Member (collectively, the “Loans”). The Loans have an initial May 9, 2027 maturity date, with three one-year extensions available upon meeting the applicable extension conditions, and bear interest at 2.65% rate, plus 1-Month CME Term SOFR (with a floor of 2.25%) (6.401% at December 31, 2025). The Company can borrow up to an additional $18,250 under the Mezzanine Loan Agreement based on meeting various performance targets over the term of the loan. Under the Loan Agreement, the Company deposited with MF1 Capital (i) $4,250 for a shortfall reserve account to pay interest and operating expenses during the initial lease up period of the Dean Street Property, and (ii) $1,550 for completion reserve deposits towards the completion of the construction of the building.
Subsequent to the loan closing the Company drew an additional $6,250 from the Mezzanine Loan.
On December 22, 2021, the Company entered into a $30,000 mortgage note agreement with Bank Leumi, N.A related to the Dean Street acquisition. The note’s original maturity was December 22, 2022 and was subsequently extended to September 22, 2023. The note required interest-only payments and bears interest at the prime rate (with a floor of 3.25%) plus 1.60%. In April 2022, the Company borrowed an additional $6,985 under the mortgage note in connection with the acquisition of additional parcels of land in February and April 2022.
On August 10, 2023, the “Company refinanced its $36,985 mortgage on its Dean Street development with a senior construction loan (“Senior Loan”) with Valley National Bank that permits borrowings up to $115,000 and a mezzanine loan (the “Mezzanine Loan”) with BADF 953 Dean Street Lender LLC that permits borrowings up to $8,000.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
New heading “Our defaults under the loan secured by our 250 Livingston Street property and the resulting appointment of a temporary receiver and the lender's right to foreclose on or take a deed in lieu of foreclosure to that property could cause a material adverse effect on us, including our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.”
New heading “Our dependency on a commercial lease with certain NYC agencies, as a single government tenant at our 141 Livingston Street property, which lease expired on December 27, 2025 and our inability to finalize the previously agreed five-year extension of that lease could have a material adverse effect on us, including our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.”
New heading “The New York City Rent Guidelines Board's adoption of a rent freeze on our rent-stabilized units may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.”
Removed heading “Our dependency on two commercial leases with certain agencies of the City of New York (NYC), as a single government tenant in our office buildings, with one lease having terminated effective August 23, 2025, and the other lease having expired on December 27, 2025 and our inability to replace NYC as a tenant at rent rates comparable to the rates in the lease that terminated in August 2025 or to enter into a five-year extension of the lease that expired in December 2025 could cause a material adverse effect on us, including our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.”
Largest changes
“Our defaults under the loan secured by our 250 Livingston Street property and the resulting appointment of a temporary receiver and the lender's right to foreclose on or take a deed in lieu of foreclosure to that property could cause a material adverse effect on us, including our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.”see in full comparison
“Our dependency on two commercial leases with certain agencies of the City of New York (NYC), as a single government tenant in our office buildings, with one lease having terminated effective August 23, 2025, and the other lease having expired on December 27, 2025 and our inability to replace NYC as a tenant at rent rates comparable to the rates in the lease that terminated in August 2025 or to enter into a five-year extension of the lease that expired in December 2025 could cause a material adverse effect on us, including our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.”see in full comparison
“Our dependency on a commercial lease with certain NYC agencies, as a single government tenant at our 141 Livingston Street property, which lease expired on December 27, 2025 and our inability to finalize the previously agreed five-year extension of that lease could have a material adverse effect on us, including our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.”see in full comparison
“The New York City Rent Guidelines Board's adoption of a rent freeze on our rent-stabilized units may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.”see in full comparison
“Our rental revenue depends on entering into leases with and collecting rents from tenants. As of March 31, 2026, Kings County Court, the Human Resources Administration, and the Department of Environmental Protection, all of which are agencies of the City of New York, (i) occupied all 206,084 of rentable square feet at 141 Livingston Street, subject to hold-over rent provisions in the lease that expired on December 27, 2025 and (ii) terminated its lease and vacated all 342,496 rentable square feet of commercial space at our 250 Livingston Street effective August 23, 2025. . …”see in full comparison
“On June 25, 2026, the New York City Rent Guidelines Board (the “RGB”) adopted 0% rent adjustments for both one-year and two-year renewals of rent-stabilized leases commencing between October 1, 2026, and September 30, 2027. As a result, we would not be able to increase rents on our rent-stabilized units to offset rising real estate taxes, insurance, utilities, payroll or debt service costs during this period, which could compress operating margins and adversely affect our net operating income, cash flow and ability to make distributions. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (16)
The risk factors disclosed in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, set forth information relating to various risks and uncertainties that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity, and operating results. Such risk factors continue to be relevant to an understanding of our business, financial condition, liquidity and operating results as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, and there have been no material changes to those risk factors for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 except for the following updates:
Our defaults under the loan secured by our 250 Livingston Street property and the resulting appointment of a temporary receiver and the lender's right to foreclose on or take a deed in lieu of foreclosure to that property could cause a material adverse effect on us, including our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
Our dependency on two commercial leases with certain agencies of the City of New York (NYC), as a single government tenant in our office buildings, with one lease having terminated effective August 23, 2025, and the other lease having expired on December 27, 2025 and our inability to replace NYC as a tenant at rent rates comparable to the rates in the lease that terminated in August 2025 or to enter into a five-year extension of the lease that expired in December 2025 could cause a material adverse effect on us, including our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
Our rental revenue depends on entering into leases with and collecting rents from tenants. As of March 31, 2026, Kings County Court, the Human Resources Administration, and the Department of Environmental Protection, all of which are agencies of the City of New York, (i) occupied all 206,084 of rentable square feet at 141 Livingston Street, subject to hold-over rent provisions in the lease that expired on December 27, 2025 and (ii) terminated its lease and vacated all 342,496 rentable square feet of commercial space at our 250 Livingston Street effective August 23, 2025. . Our commercial leases with the City of New York comprised approximately 11% and 21% of total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. We are also subject to covenants covering these leases in our loan agreements related to our commercial office properties located at 250 Livingston Street and 141 Livingston Street. See Note 4, Notes Payable, to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) included in Part I of this Form 10-Q for information related to 141 Livingston Street property and 250 Livingston Street property.
AsCertain agencies of February 23, 2024, Thethe City of New York,York a(“NYC”) municipalterminated corporationtheir actinglease throughand thevacated Departmentall 342,496 rentable square feet of Citywidecommercial Administrative Services ("NYC”), notified us of its intention to terminate its leasespace at our 250 Livingston Street property in Brooklyn, New York (the “Property”) effective August 23, 2025, and they vacated the space on that date.2025. The lease generally provided for rent payments in the amount of $15.4 million per annum.
Our subsidiary, 250 Livingston Owner LLC (“Borrower”), entered into the Loan Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2019 (the “Loan Agreement”), with Citi Real Estate Funding Inc., related to a loan in the principal amount of $125 million (the “Loan”). The Loan is evidenced by certain promissory notes (the “Notes”) and secured by our 250 Livingston Street property in Brooklyn, New York (the “Property”). We and our Operating Partnership serve as guarantors of certain obligations under the Loan. . See Note 4, Notes Payable, to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) included in Part I of this Form 10-Q for additional information related to Property and the Loan.
On March 25, 2026, the Lender filed a complaint against the Borrower, theus Companyas and the Company’sour subsidiary Clipper Realty L.P. due to the Borrower’s defaults under the Notes and the other Loan documents. The Plaintiff demanded, among other things, that a receiver be appointed to manage the Property and that the Property and the personal property within the Property be sold and the proceeds be applied to the satisfaction of indebtedness evidenced by the Notes and other Loan documents. On April 29, 2026, the court entered an order granting the Lender's demand to appoint a temporary receiver. Pursuant to the court order, the receiver is authorized to enter into the possession of the Property, to rent or lease any part of the premises, to collect and receive all rents and fees due and unpaid in connection with the premises, and the Companywe must turn over to the receiver all rents collected from and after the date of the court order..order.
The Borrower, the Guarantors and the Lender entered into the Consent and Cooperation Agreement (the “Agreement”), effective as of June 4, 2026 (the “Effective Date”). Pursuant to the Agreement, the Lender and the Borrower agreed to jointly market and sell the Loan to a third-party buyer during a marketing period that commenced on the Effective Date and will end 45 days thereafter (the “Marketing Period”), subject to extension at the Lender’s sole discretion. At the end of the Marketing Period, the Lender has the right to foreclose on the Property, including taking the deed to the Property in lieu of foreclosure. The Agreement also provides that the Borrower has the right to submit an offer to purchase the Loan. , and the Lender has not yet taken any such action. The Agreement also provides that the Borrower has the right to submit an offer to purchase the Loan. If the lender were to foreclose on, or takes a deed in lieu of foreclosure to, the Property, it could have a material adverse effect on us, including our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
.
The Company is in the process of negotiating a Consent and Cooperation Agreement with the Lender for the sale of the Loan. There can be no assurance that such Consent and Cooperation Agreement will be consummated.
We have been unable to replace the NYC as a tenant, and, evenEven if we entersuccessfully intoacquire the Consentloan and Cooperation Agreement withafter the Lender,Marketing Period is over , we may continue to be unable to replace the NYC with other commercial tenants at comparable rent rates or at all, may incur substantial costs to improve the vacated space or may have to offer significant inducements to fill the space, all of which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
Our dependency on a commercial lease with certain NYC agencies, as a single government tenant at our 141 Livingston Street property, which lease expired on December 27, 2025 and our inability to finalize the previously agreed five-year extension of that lease could have a material adverse effect on us, including our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
Our rental revenue depends on entering into leases with and collecting rents from tenants. As of June 30, 2026, Kings County Court, the Human Resources Administration, and the Department of Environmental Protection, all of which are agencies of the City of New York, (i) occupied all 206,084 of rentable square feet at 141 Livingston Street, subject to hold-over rent provisions in the lease that expired on December 27, 2025. The expired lease provided for $10,300 in rent per annum.
NYC continues to occupy that space and is paying holdover rent in accordance with the terms of the expired lease, and we and the NYC continue to finalize a previously agreed five-year extension of that lease. There can be no assurance that those negotiations will conclude with an agreement. We may continue to be unable to enter into a new lease with the NYC or replace the NYC agencies with other commercial tenants at comparable rent rates or at all, we may incur substantial costs to improve the vacated space or may have to offer significant inducements to fill the space, all of which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow. See Note 4, Notes Payable, to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) included in Part I of this Form 10-Q for information related to 141 Livingston Street property.
The New York City Rent Guidelines Board's adoption of a rent freeze on our rent-stabilized units may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
On June 25, 2026, the New York City Rent Guidelines Board (the “RGB”) adopted 0% rent adjustments for both one-year and two-year renewals of rent-stabilized leases commencing between October 1, 2026, and September 30, 2027. As a result, we would not be able to increase rents on our rent-stabilized units to offset rising real estate taxes, insurance, utilities, payroll or debt service costs during this period, which could compress operating margins and adversely affect our net operating income, cash flow and ability to make distributions. Because the RGB is required to set new adjustment percentages annually, we cannot predict whether limited or no increases will be adopted in future years, or whether litigation challenging these determinations will alter their effect.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Income Statement for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands)”
Largest changes
As ofsee in full comparisonMarchJune31,30, 2026, the Company’s office property 250 Livingston Street was vacant as the City of New York vacated as of August 23, 2025.The Company is currently seeking new tenants to replace the City of New York.However, there is no assurance that the Company will be able to replace the City of New York as its tenant or will be able to replace it at comparable rents. Until a new tenant is located, the Company expects to lose approximately $16,000 per annum in combined rental income and property tax and common area maintenance reimbursements and the property will not be able to fund its debt service. The Company’s defaults under the mortgage loan secured by our 250 Livingston Street property resulted in the appointment of a temporary receiver for that property, and the lender has the right at the end of the marketing period under the Consent and Cooperation Agreement (the “Agreement”) entered into with the lender to foreclose on the property or to take a deed to the property in lieu of foreclosure. As of August 6, 2026, the lender has not taken any such action. The Agreement also provides that the borrower under that mortgage loan has the right to submit an offer to purchase the loan.
“General and administrative. General and administrative expenses increased to $8,039 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, from $7,438 for the six months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to the accrual of various fees related to our default on the 250 Livingston building.”see in full comparison
“Interest expense, net. Interest expense, net, increased to $25,647 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, from $22,120 for the six months ended June 30, 2025, primarily as a result of the Company accruing default interest on the 250 Livingston loan.”see in full comparison
“Income Statement for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands)”see in full comparison
“Litigation Settlement and other. Litigation settlement and other increased to $3,809 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, from $26 for the six months ended June 30, 2025, due to the accrual of a loss reserve on the Sanchez litigation case.”see in full comparison
“See note 4 to condensed consolidated financial statements, “- Liquidity and Capital Resources” below and Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors.””see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (35)
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company owned:
During the firstsecond quarter of 2026, the Company’s residential properties continued to have elevated occupancy levels and experienced growth in rental rates, as a result of a robust rental market in the New York metro area. The average rental rate per square foot at the Tribeca House property at MarchJune 31,30, 2026,2026 was $89.64,$91.88, up from $83.03$85.60 at MarchJune 31,30, 2025. At the Flatbush Gardens property, average residential rent per square foot at MarchJune 31,30, 20262026, was $32.67,$33.13, up from $30.80$31.27 at MarchJune 31,30, 2025. At the Clover House property, average residential rent per square foot at MarchJune 31,30, 20262026, was $90.44,$91.19, upan increase from $86.74$87.76 at MarchJune 31,30, 2025.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company’s office property 250 Livingston Street was vacant as the City of New York vacated as of August 23, 2025. The Company is currently seeking new tenants to replace the City of New York. However, there is no assurance that the Company will be able to replace the City of New York as its tenant or will be able to replace it at comparable rents. Until a new tenant is located, the Company expects to lose approximately $16,000 per annum in combined rental income and property tax and common area maintenance reimbursements and the property will not be able to fund its debt service. The Company’s defaults under the mortgage loan secured by our 250 Livingston Street property resulted in the appointment of a temporary receiver for that property, and the lender has the right at the end of the marketing period under the Consent and Cooperation Agreement (the “Agreement”) entered into with the lender to foreclose on the property or to take a deed to the property in lieu of foreclosure. As of August 6, 2026, the lender has not taken any such action. The Agreement also provides that the borrower under that mortgage loan has the right to submit an offer to purchase the loan.
Additionally, our lease with the City of New York at 141 Livingston expired in December 2025, although the City of New York continues to occupy its office space and pays its rent in accordance with the terms of the expired lease. The Company and the City of New York are negotiating the terms of a five-year extension of their expired lease. There can be no assurance that the negotiations will conclude with an agreement, and the Company is at risk of not replacing the City of New York as its tenant or not being able to replace it at comparable rents. See note 4 to condensed consolidated financial statements, “- Liquidity and Capital Resources” below and Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors.”
See note 4 to condensed consolidated financial statements, “- Liquidity and Capital Resources” below and Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors.”
Throughout the first three monthshalf of 2026 and all of 2025, we continued to benefit from relatively low interest rates on our debt. Our weighted average interest rate as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, was approximately 4.2% per annum.
Income Statement for the Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands)
Revenue. Residential rental income increased to $30,201$29,909 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, from $28,120$28,363 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, primarily due to increases in rental rates and leased occupancy at all properties in 2026 andpartially slightlyoffset lowerby higher bad debt expense. For example, Thebase average rental raterent per square foot increased at the Tribeca House property to $91.88 at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, was $89.64, up from $83.03$85.60 at MarchJune 31,30, 2025.2025, At the Flatbush Gardens property, average residential rent per square footand at March 31, 2026 was $32.67, up from $30.80 at March 31, 2025. At the Clover House property, averageto residential rent per square foot$91.19 at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $90.44,2026, up from $86.74$87.76 at MarchJune 31,30, 2025.
Commercial rental income decreased to $6,206$6,324 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, from $10,205$9,979 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 20252025, due to the City of New York exiting 250 Livingston on August 23, 2025.
Property operating expenses. Property operating expenses include property-level costs such as compensation costs for property-level personnel, repairs and maintenance, supplies, utilities and landscaping. Property operating expenses increaseddecreased to $10,027$9,089 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, from $9,911$9,446 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, primarily due to higherlower repairs and maintenance andat utilitiesthe expensesFlatbush Gardens property partially offset by lowerincreased payroll,water legaland sewer costs andat supplies.Tribeca House.
Real estate taxes and insurance. Real estate taxes and insurance expenses increased to $7,545$7,567 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, from $7,349$7,333 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, primarily due to slightly increased real estate taxes and insurance premiums across the portfolio.
General and administrative. General and administrative expenses increased to $3,947$4,094 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, from $3,707$3,732 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, primarily due to the accrual of various fees related to our default on the 250 Livingston building.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense decreasedincreased to $7,306$7,350 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, from $7,346$7,314 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.
Litigation Settlement and other. Litigation settlement and other increased to $3,600$209 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, from $0$26 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, due to the accrual of aadditional loss reserve on the Sanchez litigation case.
Interest expense, net. Interest expense, net, increased to $12,783$12,863 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, from $10,964$11,157 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 20252025, primarily as a result of the Company accruing default interest on the 250 Livingston loan.
Net loss. As a result of the foregoing, net loss increased to $8,801$4,939 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, from $952$656 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.
Income Statement for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands)
Revenue. Residential rental income increased to $60,111 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, from $56,483 for the six months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to increases in rental rates and leased occupancy at all properties in 2026 and slightly lower bad debt expense. For example, base rent per square foot increased at the Tribeca House property to $91.88 at June 30, 2026, from $85.60 at June 30, 2025, and at the Clover House property, to $91.19 at June 30, 2026, up from $87.76 at June 30, 2025.
Commercial rental income decreased to $12,530 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, from $20,183 for the six months ended June 30, 2025 due to the City of New York exiting 250 Livingston on August 23, 2025.
Property operating expenses. Property operating expenses include property-level costs such as compensation costs for property-level personnel, repairs and maintenance, supplies, utilities and landscaping. Property operating expenses decreased to $19,117 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, from $19,357 for the six months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to lower legal costs.
Real estate taxes and insurance. Real estate taxes and insurance expenses increased to $15,112 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, from $14,682 for the six months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to slightly increased real estate taxes across the portfolio.
General and administrative. General and administrative expenses increased to $8,039 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, from $7,438 for the six months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to the accrual of various fees related to our default on the 250 Livingston building.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased to $14,656 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, from $14,660 for the six months ended June 30, 2025.
Litigation Settlement and other. Litigation settlement and other increased to $3,809 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, from $26 for the six months ended June 30, 2025, due to the accrual of a loss reserve on the Sanchez litigation case.
Interest expense, net. Interest expense, net, increased to $25,647 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, from $22,120 for the six months ended June 30, 2025, primarily as a result of the Company accruing default interest on the 250 Livingston loan.
Net loss. As a result of the foregoing, net loss increased to $13,739 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, from $1,607 for the six months ended June 30, 2025.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had $1,285,799$1,287,226 of indebtedness, net of unamortized issuance costs, secured by our properties, $26,083$37,702 of cash and cash equivalents, and $28,568$24,873 of restricted cash. See Note 4, “Notes Payable” of our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the Company’s property-level debt.
Our short-term liquidity needs will primarily be to fund operating expenses, recurring capital expenditures, property taxes and insurance, interest and scheduled debt principal payments, general and administrative expenses, and distributions to stockholders and unit holders. We generally expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements through net cash provided by operations and cash on hand, and we believe we will have sufficient resources to meet our short-term liquidity requirements Our principal long-term liquidity needs will primarily be to fund additional property acquisitions, major renovation and upgrading projects, and debt payments and retirements at maturity. We do not expect that net cash provided by operations will be sufficient to meet all of these long-term liquidity needs. We anticipate meeting our long-term liquidity requirements by using cash as an interim measure and funds from public and private equity offerings and long-term secured and unsecured debt offerings. The Company sold its property at 10 West 65th Street during the year ended December 31, 2025, and was able to net approximately $13,000 in proceeds from such sale. Additionally, the Company refinanced its existing construction loan at its Dean Street property with a maximum of $160,000 bridge loan, of which $141,750 was drawn at closing,closing. The Company subsequently borrowed an additional $6,250 was subsequently drawn$8,250 and the Company may potentially draw additional amounts that can be used for general corporate purposes.
In order to qualify as a REIT for Federal income tax purposes, we must currently distribute at least 90% of our taxable income to our shareholders. On FebruaryMay 24,5, 2026, the company declared dividends and distributions on our common shares, Class B LLC units and LTIP units totaling $4,712$4,690 paid on MarchJune 19,4, 2026. During the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, we paid dividends and distributions on our common shares, Class B LLC units and LTIP units totaling $4,712$4,690 and $4,614, respectively.
Cash Flows for the ThreeSix Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands)
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities, investing activities and financing activities for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, were as follows:
Net cash flow provided by operating activities was $3,568$17,999 for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $6,676$15,044 for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, primarily due to thestrong Companyresidential havinglease lessincome cash collections at our commercial rental properties as a resultand the 250timing of payments on the 141 Livingston vacancy described above.lease.
Net cash used by investing activities was $1,925$(4,964), for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $9,680$17,967 usedprovided for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The decrease was primarily due to decreasedproceeds from the sale of 10 west 65th Street during the six months ended June 30, 2025 and significantly greater capital spending at Prospect House property during the Deansix Streetmonth developmentended asJune it was completed in30, 2025.
Net cash used by financing activities was $5,146$8,614 for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to ($5,543)$10,225 provided by financing activitiesused for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. Cash was used in the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, related primarily byto dividends and distributions of $4,712$9,402, additional borrowings of $2 million at 953 Dean Street property and loan amortization payments of $434.$1,008. Cash was providedused in the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, 2025 related primarily to the repayment of $31,438 mortgage loan in conjunction with sale of 10 West 65th Street property, $9,228 of dividend and distribution payments and $2,996 of loan issuance costs, partially offset by $6,371of borrowings$34,231 related to the Dean Street property development,borrowings partiallyon offsetthe by $578 ofconstruction loan amortization payments and loansubsequent issuance costs of $250refinance.
Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe that there have been no material changes to the items that we disclosed as our critical accounting policies under Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the three monthsyear ended December 31, 2025.
CLPR insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 7 Form 4 filings (2 insiders, 16 trade dates, 484,521 shares, about $1.6M) and open-market sales in 0 filings. Net open-market shares: 484,521 (purchases minus sales); net value about $1.6M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-30 | Bistricer David |
Gift | 693,125 | — | — |
| 2026-09-30 | Bistricer David |
Other | 4,278,058 | — | — |
| 2026-09-30 | Bistricer David |
Gift | 1,069,515 | — | — |
| 2026-09-30 | Bistricer David |
Other | 348,933 | — | — |
| 2026-09-30 | Bistricer David |
Other | 318,262 | — | — |
| 2026-09-30 | Levinson Sam |
Gift | 188,354 | — | — |
| 2026-09-30 | Levinson Sam |
Gift | 693,125 | — | — |
| 2026-09-30 | Levinson Sam |
Gift | 1,069,514 | — | — |
| 2026-09-28 | Bistricer Jacob |
Gift | 63,000 | — | — |
| 2026-09-28 | Bistricer Jacob |
Open-market purchase | 73,500 | $3.35 | $246.2K |
| 2026-09-24 | Levinson Sam |
Open-market purchase | 9,317 | $3.38 | $31.5K |
| 2026-09-23 | Levinson Sam |
Open-market purchase | 13,606 | $3.38 | $46.0K |
| 2026-09-15 | Levinson Sam |
Open-market purchase | 4,315 | $3.30 | $14.2K |
| 2026-09-14 | Levinson Sam |
Open-market purchase | 4,769 | $3.28 | $15.6K |
| 2026-09-09 | Levinson Sam |
Open-market purchase | 110,710 | $3.31 | $366.5K |
| 2026-09-08 | Levinson Sam |
Open-market purchase | 6,842 | $3.24 | $22.2K |
| 2026-09-02 | Levinson Sam |
Open-market purchase | 5,387 | $3.25 | $17.5K |
| 2026-09-01 | Levinson Sam |
Open-market purchase | 934 | $3.20 | $3.0K |
| 2026-08-31 | Levinson Sam |
Open-market purchase | 1,742 | $3.25 | $5.7K |
| 2026-08-20 | Levinson Sam |
Open-market purchase | 2,392 | $3.19 | $7.6K |
| 2026-08-19 | Levinson Sam |
Open-market purchase | 9,260 | $3.14 | $29.1K |
| 2026-08-18 | Levinson Sam |
Open-market purchase | 86,983 | $3.15 | $274.0K |
| 2026-08-14 | Levinson Sam |
Open-market purchase | 3,945 | $3.29 | $13.0K |
| 2026-08-13 | Levinson Sam |
Open-market purchase | 81,647 | $3.21 | $262.1K |
| 2026-08-12 | Levinson Sam |
Open-market purchase | 69,172 | $3.09 | $213.7K |
Well-known investors holding CLPR (13F)
None of the 59 investors we track reported a position in their latest 13F.