CPSS 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. · Nasdaq · Finance Services · CIK 889609 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Our Use of Artificial Intelligence May Expose Us to Risks That Could Impact our Business, Financial Conditions, and Results of Operations.”
Largest changes
“Our Use of Artificial Intelligence May Expose Us to Risks That Could Impact our Business, Financial Conditions, and Results of Operations.”see in full comparison
“We use artificial intelligence (“AI”) in certain aspects of our business operations, and we or our third-party service providers may expand the use of these technologies in the future. AI may be used to support functions such as customer service, servicing operations, data analysis, compliance monitoring, and other processes related to our auto finance activities. Implementing and maintaining these technologies may require significant investments in infrastructure, personnel, data management, and training. …”see in full comparison
“In addition, the legal and regulatory environment relating to AI is evolving and uncertain. New or changing laws, regulations, or supervisory expectations could limit how we use AI technologies, require modifications to our systems or processes, or increase compliance costs. Failure to comply with applicable requirements could expose us to regulatory scrutiny or enforcement actions.”see in full comparison
A deterioration in economic conditions and certain economic factors, such as reduced business activity, high unemployment, interest rates, housing prices, energy prices (including the price of gasoline), increased consumer indebtedness (including of obligors on the receivables), lack of available credit, the rate of inflation (such as the recent increase in inflation) and consumer perceptions of the economy, as well as other factors, such as terrorist events, civil unrest, cyber-attacks, public health emergencies, extreme weather conditions or significant changes in the geopolitical environment (such as the ongoing military conflict between Ukraine and Russia and thesee in full comparisonconflictconflicts inIsraelthe Middle East, and recent U.S. action taken in Venezuela) and/or public policy, including increased state, local or federal taxation, could adversely affect the ability and willingness of obligors to meet their payment obligations under the receivables we originate. Our operating results could be adversely affected if obligors are unable to make timely payments on their receivables.
“We may also rely on AI technologies developed or supported by third-party vendors. As a result, we may be dependent on those vendors’ development practices, training data, and risk controls, over which we may have limited visibility or control. Although we seek to manage and oversee our third-party vendors through our vendor risk management and oversight processes, we may not be able to fully mitigate risks arising from their technologies, practices, or controls, and certain risks may remain outside of our control.”see in full comparison
“The limited transparency of certain AI models may make it more difficult to monitor model performance, identify errors or bias, and demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements. AI systems may produce inaccurate or unintended results, reflect biases in the data used to train them, or otherwise operate in ways that are inconsistent with our policies, regulatory obligations, or customer expectations.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (14)
We expect to earn quarterly
profits during 20252026; however, there can be no assurance as to that expectation. Our expectation of profitability is a forward-looking
statement. We discuss the assumptions underlying that expectation under the caption “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”
in this report. We identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ, generally in the “Risk Factors” section
of this report, and also under the caption “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” One reason for our expectation
is that we have had positive net income in each of the thirteenfourteen fiscal years ended December 31, 2024,2025, although not in every quarter within
that period.
We depend on various financing
sources, including credit facilities, our securitization program and other secured and unsecured debt issuances, to finance our business
operations. Historically, our primary sources of day-to-day liquidity have been our warehouse credit facilities, in which we sell and
contribute automobile contracts, as often as twice a week, to special-purpose subsidiaries, where they are "warehoused" until
they are financed on a long-term basis through the issuance and sale of asset-backed notes. Upon sale of the notes, funds advanced under
one or more warehouse credit facilities are repaid from the proceeds. Our current short-term funding capacity is $535$702.5 million, comprising
twothree credit facilities. BothAll warehouse credit facilities have a revolving period during which we may receive advances secured by contributed
automobile contracts, followed by an amortization period during which no further advances may be made, but prior to which outstanding
advances are due and payable. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations –
Liquidity and Capital Resources – Liquidity”.
While the specific terms and
mechanics vary among transactions, our securitization and warehousing agreements generally provide that we will receive excess spread
cash flows only if the amount of overcollateralization and spread account balances have reached specified levels and/or the delinquency,
defaults or net losses related to the automobile contracts in the automobile contract pools are below certain predetermined levels. In
the event delinquencies, defaults or net losses on automobile contracts exceed these levels, the terms of the securitization or warehouse
credit facility:
A deterioration in economic
conditions and certain economic factors, such as reduced business activity, high unemployment, interest rates, housing prices, energy
prices (including the price of gasoline), increased consumer indebtedness (including of obligors on the receivables), lack of available
credit, the rate of inflation (such as the recent increase in inflation) and consumer perceptions of the economy, as well as other factors,
such as terrorist events, civil unrest, cyber-attacks, public health emergencies, extreme weather conditions or significant changes in
the geopolitical environment (such as the ongoing military conflict between Ukraine and Russia and the conflictconflicts in Israelthe Middle East, and
recent U.S. action taken in Venezuela) and/or public
policy, including increased state, local or federal taxation, could adversely affect
the ability and willingness of obligors to meet their
payment obligations under the receivables we originate. Our operating results could
be adversely affected if obligors are unable to make
timely payments on their receivables.
The credit spread between
the interest rates payable on our securitization trust debt and the rates payable on risk-free investments has varied. The Federal Reserve
increased interest rates multiple times in 2022 and 2023. As a result, we experienced increased interest expense in 2023. In 2024,2024 and
2025, the
Federal Reserve lowered short term interest rates. The pace and direction of additional interest rate changes remain uncertain.
If interest
rates on risk-free debt increase, or if our spread above risk-free rates increase, or both, we would expect an increase in
interest expense.
If interest rates in general should rise, our expenses would likewise rise, which could have a material adverse effect
on our financial
position, liquidity, results of operation and our ability to enter into future financing transactions.
We specialize in the
purchase purchase
and servicing of automobile contracts to finance automobile purchases by sub-prime customers, those who have limited credit history, low
income,histories or past credit problems. Such automobile contracts entail a higher risk of non-performance, higher delinquencies and
higher losses
than automobile contracts with more creditworthy customers. While we believe that our pricing of the automobile
contracts and the underwriting
criteria and collection methods we employ enable us to control, to a degree, the higher risks
inherent in automobile contracts with sub-prime
customers, no assurance can be given that such pricing, criteria and methods will
afford adequate protection against such risks.
For our receivables originated
prior to January 2018, we maintain an allowance for credit losses on automobile contracts held on our balance sheet, which reflects our
estimates of probable credit losses that can be reasonably estimated. If the allowance is inadequate, then we would recognize the losses
in excess of the allowance as an expense and our results of operations could be adversely affected.
Our Use of Artificial Intelligence May Expose Us to Risks That Could Impact our Business, Financial Conditions, and Results of Operations.
We use artificial intelligence (“AI”) in certain aspects of our business operations, and we or our third-party service providers may expand the use of these technologies in the future. AI may be used to support functions such as customer service, servicing operations, data analysis, compliance monitoring, and other processes related to our auto finance activities. Implementing and maintaining these technologies may require significant investments in infrastructure, personnel, data management, and training. There can be no assurance that these investments will deliver the anticipated benefits or that AI technologies can be successfully integrated into our existing systems and processes without disruption. If we are unable to effectively implement or adapt to evolving technologies, including AI, as quickly or successfully as our competitors, our operational efficiency, relationships with automobile dealers, and ability to compete in the auto finance market could be adversely affected.
In addition, the legal and regulatory environment relating to AI is evolving and uncertain. New or changing laws, regulations, or supervisory expectations could limit how we use AI technologies, require modifications to our systems or processes, or increase compliance costs. Failure to comply with applicable requirements could expose us to regulatory scrutiny or enforcement actions.
We may also rely on AI technologies developed or supported by third-party vendors. As a result, we may be dependent on those vendors’ development practices, training data, and risk controls, over which we may have limited visibility or control. Although we seek to manage and oversee our third-party vendors through our vendor risk management and oversight processes, we may not be able to fully mitigate risks arising from their technologies, practices, or controls, and certain risks may remain outside of our control.
The limited transparency of certain AI models may make it more difficult to monitor model performance, identify errors or bias, and demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements. AI systems may produce inaccurate or unintended results, reflect biases in the data used to train them, or otherwise operate in ways that are inconsistent with our policies, regulatory obligations, or customer expectations.
If we are unable to effectively manage the risks associated with the use of AI, including operational, regulatory, data security, or reputational risks, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected.
The
fair value of an asset is, by definition, the exchange price in an orderly transaction between market participants. Receivables such as
ours are not regularly traded on exchanges where we can observe prices for exchanges of similar assets. We may therefore rely on estimates
of what a market participant would pay for our receivables. If such estimated value were to be materially different from our recorded
value, wean might be requiredadjustment to adjust the recorded value of our receivables.receivables will be required. A downward readjustment in recorded value would correspondingly
reduce our income and book value.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Residual Interest Financing”
Largest changes
“Accordingly, we believe that the ultimate resolution of such legal proceedings and contingencies, after taking into account our current litigation reserves, should not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition. …”see in full comparison
“We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the income tax expense line in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Accrued interest and penalties are included within the related tax liability line in the consolidated balance sheets.”see in full comparison
Uncertainty of Capital Markets and General Economic Conditions We depend upon the availability of warehouse credit facilities and access to long-term financing through the issuance of asset-backed securities collateralized by our automobile contracts. Since 1994, we have completedsee in full comparison103107 term securitizations of approximately$20.6$22.4 billion in contracts. We generally conduct our securitizations on a quarterly basis, near the beginning of each calendar quarter, resulting in four securitizations per calendar year.However, we completed only three securitizations in 2020. In April 2020 we postponed our planned securitization due to the onset of the pandemic and the effective closure of the capital markets in which our securitizations are executed. Subsequently, we successfully completed securitizations in June and September 2020, and then on a regular quarterly schedule from January 2021 through January 2025.
Since 1994 we have conductedsee in full comparison103107 term securitizations of automobile contracts that we originated under our regular programs. As of December 31,2024,2025,1719 of those securitizations are active and all are structured as secured financings. We generally conduct our securitizations on a quarterly basis, near the beginning of each calendar quarter, resulting in four securitizations per calendar year.However, we completed only three securitizations in 2020. In April 2020 we postponed our planned securitization due to the onset of the pandemic and the effective closure of the capital markets in which our securitizations are executed. Subsequently we successfully completed securitizations in June and September 2020.
“Facility Established in October 2025. On October 17, 2025, we entered into a $167.5 million two-year warehouse credit line with Capital One, N.A as the Class A Lender and Oaktree Asset-Backed Income Private Placement Fund Inc., as the Class B Lenders. The facility is structured to allow us to fund a portion of the purchase price of automobile contracts by borrowing from a credit facility to our consolidated subsidiary Page Eleven Funding, LLC. The facility provides for effective advances up to 95.50% of eligible finance receivables. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (41)
We were incorporated and began
began our operations in March 1991. From inception through December 31, 2024,2025, we have purchased a total of approximately $23.0$24.7 billion
of automobile
contracts from dealers. In addition, we acquired a total of approximately $822.3 million of automobile contracts in mergers
and acquisitions in 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2011. Contract purchase volumes and managed portfolio levels for the five years ended December
31, 20242025 are shown in
the table below. Managed portfolio comprises both contracts we owned and those we were servicing for third parties.
Our principal executive offices
are in Las Vegas, Nevada. Most of our operational and administrative functions take place in Irvine, California. Credit and underwriting
functions are performed primarily in our California branch with certain of these functions also performed in our FloridaFlorida, Nevada, and Nevada
Virginia branches.
We service our automobile contracts from our California, Nevada, Virginia, Florida, and Illinois branches.
Since 1994 we have conducted
103107 term securitizations of automobile contracts that we originated under our regular programs. As of December 31, 2024,2025, 1719 of those securitizations
are active and all are structured as secured financings. We generally conduct our securitizations on a quarterly basis, near the beginning
of each calendar quarter, resulting in four securitizations per calendar year. However, we completed only three securitizations in 2020.
In April 2020 we postponed our planned securitization due to the onset of the pandemic and the effective closure of the capital markets
in which our securitizations are executed. Subsequently we successfully completed securitizations in June and September 2020.
Generally, prior to a securitization
transaction we fund our automobile contract acquisitions primarily with proceeds from warehouse credit facilities. Our current short-term
funding capacity is $535$702.5 million, comprising twothree credit facilities. The first credit facility was established in May 2012. This facility
was most recently renewed in July 2024, extending the revolving period to July 2026, with an optional amortization period through July
2027. In addition, the capacity was increased from $200 million to $335 million in December 2024.
In November 2015, we entered
into anothera $100 million facility.facility with Ares Agent Services, L.P. In June 2022, we doubledincreased the capacity forof thisour facilitycredit agreement from $100
million to $200 million. This facility
was most recently renewed in March 2024, extending the revolving period to March 2026, followed
by an amortization period to March 2028.
In October 2025, we entered into a new $167.5 million facility. This facility has a two year revolving period to October 2027, with an optional amortization period through April 2029.
We believe that our
accounting accounting
policies related to (a) Finance Receivables at Fair Value,Value (b) Allowance for Finance Credit Losses, (c)and Term Securitizations, (d) Accrual
for Contingent Liabilities and (e) Income TaxesSecuritizations are the most critical to understanding and
evaluating our reported financial results.
Such policies are described below.
Accrual for Contingent Liabilities
We are routinely involved
in various legal proceedings resulting from our consumer finance activities and practices, both continuing and discontinued. Our legal
counsel has advised us on such matters where, based on information available at the time of this report, there is an indication that it
is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably determined.
We have recorded a liability
as of December 31, 2024, which represents our best estimate of probable incurred losses for legal contingencies at that date. The amount
of losses that may ultimately be incurred cannot be estimated with certainty. However, based on such information as is available to us,
we believe that the range of reasonably possible losses for the legal proceedings and contingencies described or referenced above, as
of December 31, 2024 does not exceed $3.2 million.
Accordingly, we believe that
the ultimate resolution of such legal proceedings and contingencies, after taking into account our current litigation reserves, should
not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition. We note, however, that in light of the uncertainties inherent
in contested proceedings, there can be no assurance that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not significantly exceed the reserves
we have accrued; as a result, the outcome of a particular matter may be material to our operating results for a particular period, depending
on, among other factors, the size of the loss or liability imposed and the level of our income for that period.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes
under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax
consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
determined based on the differences between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in
effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities
is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
Deferred tax assets are recognized
subject to management’s judgment that realization is more likely than not. A valuation allowance is recognized for a deferred tax
asset if, based on the weight of the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not
be realized. In making such judgements, significant weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified.
In determining the possible
future realization of deferred tax assets, we have considered future taxable income from the following sources: (a) reversal of taxable
temporary differences; and (b) forecasted future net earnings from operations. Based upon those considerations, we have concluded that
it is more likely than not that the U.S. and state net operating loss carryforward periods provide enough time to utilize the deferred
tax assets pertaining to the existing net operating loss carryforwards and any net operating loss that would be created by the reversal
of the future net deductions which have not yet been taken on a tax return. Our estimates of taxable income are forward-looking statements,
and there can be no assurance that our estimates of such taxable income will be correct. Factors discussed under "Risk Factors,"
and under the heading “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements." may affect whether such projections prove to
be correct.
We recognize interest and
penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the income tax expense line in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Accrued interest and penalties are included within the related tax liability line in the consolidated balance sheets.
Uncertainty of Capital Markets and General Economic Conditions We depend upon the availability
of warehouse credit facilities and access to long-term financing through the issuance of asset-backed securities collateralized by our
automobile contracts. Since 1994, we have completed 103107 term securitizations of approximately $20.6$22.4 billion in contracts. We generally
conduct our securitizations on a quarterly basis, near the beginning of each calendar quarter, resulting in four securitizations per calendar
year. However, we completed only three securitizations in 2020. In April 2020 we postponed our planned securitization due to the onset
of the pandemic and the effective closure of the capital markets in which our securitizations are executed. Subsequently, we successfully
completed securitizations in June and September 2020, and then on a regular quarterly schedule from January 2021 through January 2025.
Certain of our securitization
transactions and ourOur warehouse credit facilities
and our residual interest financings contain various financial covenants requiring certain minimum financial ratiosratios. and results.
Such covenants include
maintaining minimum levels of liquidity and net worth and not exceeding maximum leverage levels. In addition, certain
securitization and
non-securitization related debt contain cross-default provisions that would allow certain creditors to declare a default
if a default
occurred under a different facility. As of December 31, 20242025 we were in compliance with all such financial covenants.
Revenues. During
the year ended
December 31, 2024,2025, our revenues were $393.5$434.5 million, an increase of $41.5$41.0 million, or 11.8%,10.4%, from the prior year
revenues of $352.0$393.5 million.
The primary reason for the increase in revenues is the increase in interest income resulting from the
increase in the average outstanding
balance of finance receivables measured at fair value. Revenues for the years ended December 31, 2024
2025 and 20232024 include fair value marks
of $21.0$6.5 and $12.0$21.0 million, respectively, to the carrying value of the portion of the
receivables portfolio accounted for at fair value.
The marks are estimates based on our evaluation of the appropriate fair value and
future earnings rate of existing receivables compared
to recently acquired receivables and increases or decreases in our estimates
of future net losses. The fair value mark in the current
period also includes an increase in our estimates of cash receipts from
interest. interest and fees compared to our estimates at the time of acquisition.
For the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, our re-evaluation of the fair values of these receivables resulted in a mark up for
certain older
receivables and a mark down to the fair values of newer receivables. The fair value mark up on the older receivables
exceeded the mark
down to the newer receivables resulting in a net mark up of $21.0$6.5 million.
Interest income for the year
ended December 31, 20242025 increased $34.7$58.7 million, or 10.6%,16.1% to $364.0$422.7 million from $329.2$364.0 million in the prior year. The primary reason
for the increase in interest income is the 10.2%15.1% increase in the average balance of our loan portfolio over the prior year period. The
interest yield on our total loan portfolio stayedincreased theto same11.4% atfrom 11.3% in the prior year period to 11.3% in the current year period. The
table below shows the average balance
and interest yield of our loan portfolio for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 20232024:
Expenses. Our operating expenses
consist largely of interest expense, provision for credit losses, employee costs, sales and general and administrative expenses. Provision
for credit losses is affected by the balance and credit performance of our portfolio of finance receivables (other than our portfolio
of finance receivables measured at fair value, as to which expected credit losses have the effect of reducing the interest rate applicable
to such receivables). Interest expense is affected by the volume of automobile contracts we purchased during the trailing 12-month period
and the use of our warehouse facilities and asset-backed securitizations to finance those contracts and, more significantly,and on the interest
rates on these facilities. Employee costs and general and administrative expenses are incurred as applications and automobile contracts
are received, processed and serviced. Factors that affect margins and net income include changes in the automobile and automobile finance
market environments, and macroeconomic factors such as interest rates and changes in the unemployment level.
Total operating expenses were
$366.1$406.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, compared to $290.9$366.1 million for the prior year, an increase of $75.2$40.4 million, or 25.8%.11.0%.
The increase is primarily due to increases in interest expense, employee costs and the amount of reductions to provision for credit losses
expenses.expense.
Employee costs increaseddecreased by
$8.0 million$823,000 or 9.1%,0.9%, to $96.2$95.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, representing 26.3%23.5% of total operating expenses. Employee costs
costs were $88.1$96.2 million in the prior year, or 30.3%26.3% of total operating expenses. The increase in employee costs can be attributed to
the increase in our outstanding managed portfolio.
General and administrative expenses
include costs associated with purchasing and servicing our portfolio of finance receivables, including expenses for facilities, credit
services, and telecommunications. General and administrative expenses were $54.7$52.9 million, ana increasedecrease of $4.7$1.8 million, or 9.4%,3.4%, compared
to the previous year and represented 14.9%13.0% of total operating expenses.
Interest expense on warehouse
lines of credit was $19.3$27.4 million for the year ended December 31, 20242025 compared to $19.2$19.3 million in the prior year. The increase was
primarily due
to the higher ratesutilization of our credit lines during 2024the year compared to 2023.last year. The average balance of our warehouse
debt was $288.0 million during the year 2025, compared to $178.5 million in 2024. The average yield of our warehouse debt was 10.8%9.5% during 2024
2025 compared
to 10.6%10.8% million in 2023.
In June 2021, March 2024, and
again in March 2025, we completed a
residual interest financingsecuritization of our residual interests from previously issued securitizations in the amount of $50.0 million. In March
2024, we completed a new residual interest financing of our residual interests fromother previously issued securitizations in the amount of
$50.0$50 million.million, $50 million, and $65 million, respectively. Interest expense on residual interest financing was $8.7$15.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 20242025, compared to $4.2
$8.7 million in the prior year.
Interest expense on our subordinated
renewable notes was $2.2$2.8 million in 20242025 compared to $1.8$2.2 million in the prior year. The average balance of the notes increased from $20.9$22.9
million in the prior year to $22.9$28.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024.2025. The average interest rate on our subordinated notes was
9.8% during 20242025 compared to 8.7% millionand in 2023.2024.
For our receivables originated
prior to January 2018, we maintain an allowance for credit losses on automobile contracts held on our balance sheet, which reflects our
estimates of probable credit losses that can be reasonably estimated. For the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, we recorded a reduction to
provision for credit losses on finance receivables in the amount of $5.3$2.9 million. In the prior year period, we recorded similar reductions
to provision for credit losses in the amount of $22.3$5.3 million. The adjustments recorded to reduce provisions for credit losses in both
periods were primarily due to better than expected credit performance for these receivables. The allowance applies only to our finance
receivables originated through December 2017, which we refer to as our legacy portfolio. The legacy portfolio balance decreased from
from $27.6 million on December 31, 2023 to $5.4 million on December 31, 2024.2024 to $520,000 on December 31, 2025. Finance receivables that we have originated since January
2018 are
accounted for at fair value. Under the fair value method of accounting, we recognize interest income net of expected credit
losses. Thus,
no provision for credit loss expense is recorded for finance receivables measured at fair value.
Sales expense consists primarily
of commission-based compensation paid to our employee sales representatives. Our sales representatives earn a salary plus commissions
based on volume of contract purchases and sales of ancillary products and services that we offer our dealers. Sales expense increased
by $1.5 million$49,000 to $22.8 million during the year ended December 31, 20242025 and represented 6.2%5.6% of total operating expenses. We purchased $1,638.3
$1,681.9 million of new contracts during the year ended December 31, 20242025 compared to $1,357.8$1,681.9 million in the prior year period.
For the year ended December
31, 2024,2025, we recorded income tax expense of $8.2$8.7 million, representing a 30%31% effective tax rate. In the prior period, our income tax expense
was $15.6$8.2 million, also representing a 26%30% effective tax rate.
Net cash provided by operating
activities for the years ended December 31, 2024, 20232025, and 20222024 was $233.8 million, $238.0$289.0 million and $215.9$233.8 million, respectively. Net
cash from operating
activities is generally provided by net income from operations adjusted for significant non-cash items such as our
provision for credit
losses and interest accretion on fair value receivables.
Net cash used in investing
activities for the year ended December 31, 2024, 20232025, and 20222024 was $769.7$590.1 million, $359.5 million and $713.9$769.7 million, respectively. Cash
used in investing
activities generally relates to purchases of automobile contracts. Purchases of finance receivables were $1,653.0$1,639.0 million
(includes acquisition
fees paid), $1,251.0 million and $1,673.2$1,653.0 million in 2024, 20232025, and 2022,2024, respectively. Cash provided by investing
activities primarily results from principal
payments and other proceeds received on finance receivables.
Net cash provided by financing
activities were $547.9$335.9 million and $84.2$547.9 million in 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively. Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2022 was $484.2 million. Cash used or provided by financing activities is primarily
related to the issuance of securitization
trust debt, reduced by the amount of repayment of securitization trust debt and net proceeds
or repayments on our warehouse lines of credit
and other debt. We issued $1,453.9$1,665.3 million in new securitization trust debt in 20242025 compared
to $1,235.5$1,453.9 million in 2023 and $1,411.0
million in 2022.2024. Repayments of securitization debt were $1,124.1$1,272.0 million, $1,078.4 million and $1,060.1$1,124.1 million in 2024, 20232025, and 2022,
2024, respectively.
We are and may in the future
be limited in our ability to purchase automobile contracts due to limits on our capital. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had unrestricted
cash of $11.7$6.3 million and $124.1$375.3 million aggregate available borrowings under our twothree warehouse credit facilities (assuming the availability
of sufficient eligible collateral). As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had approximately $23.0$11.9 million of such eligible collateral. During 2024,2025,
we completed four securitizations aggregating $1,453.9$1,665.3 million of notes sold. In January 2025,2026, we completed another securitization with
$442.4$345.6 million of notes sold. Cash proceeds from this securitization were used to pay down the outstanding balance on our twowarehouse warehousecredit
credit facilities thus increasing the amounts available for borrowing under these facilities. Our plans to manage our liquidity include maintaining
maintaining our rate of automobile contract purchases at a level that matches our available capital, and, as appropriate, minimizing our operating
operating costs. If we are unable to complete such securitizations, we may be unable to increase our rate of automobile contract purchases,
in which
case our interest income and other portfolio related income could decrease.
Our liquidity will also be
affected by releases of cash from the trusts established with our securitizations. While the specific terms and mechanics of each spread
account vary among transactions, our securitization agreements generally provide that we will receive excess cash flows, if any, only
if the amount of credit enhancement has reached specified levels and the delinquency or net losses related to the automobile contracts
in the pool are below certain predetermined levels. In the event delinquencies or net losses on the automobile contracts exceed such levels,
the terms of the securitization may require increased credit enhancement to be accumulated for the particular pool. There can be no assurance
that collections from the related trusts will continue to generate sufficient cash.
Our warehouse credit facilities
contain various financial covenants requiring certain minimum financial ratios and results.ratios. Such covenants include maintaining minimum
levels of liquidity
and net worth and not exceeding maximum leverage levels. In addition, certain of our debt agreements other than our
term securitizations
contain cross-default provisions. Such cross-default provisions would allow the respective creditors to declare a
default if an event
of default occurred with respect to other indebtedness of ours, but only if such other event of default were to be
accompanied by acceleration
of such other indebtedness. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we were in compliance with all such financial covenants.
Facility Established in October 2025. On October 17, 2025, we entered into a $167.5 million two-year warehouse credit line with Capital One, N.A as the Class A Lender and Oaktree Asset-Backed Income Private Placement Fund Inc., as the Class B Lenders. The facility is structured to allow us to fund a portion of the purchase price of automobile contracts by borrowing from a credit facility to our consolidated subsidiary Page Eleven Funding, LLC. The facility provides for effective advances up to 95.50% of eligible finance receivables. The Class A loans under the facility generally accrue interest during the revolving period at a per annum rate equal to the Term SOFR plus 2.75% per annum, with a minimum rate of 3.00% per annum and during the amortization period at a per annum rate equal to the Term SOFR plus 3.75% per annum, with a minimum rate of 4.00% per annum. The Class B loans under the facility generally accrue interest during the revolving period at a per annum rate equal to the Term SOFR plus 6.40% per annum, with a minimum rate of 6.65% per annum and during the amortization period at a per annum rate equal to the Term SOFR plus 7.40% per annum, with a minimum rate of 7.65% per annum. At December 31, 2025 there was $118.3 million outstanding under this facility.
Residual Interest Financing
Residual Interest Financing. On
May 16, 2018, we completed a $40.0 million securitization of residual interests from previously issued securitizations. In this residual
interest financing transaction, qualified institutional buyers purchased $40.0 million of asset-backed notes secured by residual interests
in thirteen CPS securitizations consecutively conducted from September 2013 through December 2016, and an 80% interest in a CPS affiliate
that owns the residual interests in the four CPS securitizations conducted in 2017. The sold notes (“2018-1 Notes”), issued
by CPS Auto Securitization Trust 2018-1, consist of a single class with a coupon of 8.595%. The notes were paid off in February 2022.
On March 20, 2025, we completed a $65 million securitization of residual interests from previously issued securitizations. In the transaction, a qualified institutional buyer purchased $65.0 million of asset-backed notes secured by an 80% interest in a CPS affiliate that owns the residual interests in five CPS securitizations issued from October 2023 through September 2024. The sold notes (“2025-1 Notes”), issued by CPS Auto Securitization Trust 2025-1, consist of a single class with a coupon of 11.00%. At December 31, 2025, there was $63.5 million outstanding under this facility.
The agreed valuation of the
collateral for the 2021-12021-1, 2024-1, and 2024-12025-1 Notes is the sum of the amounts on deposit in the underlying spread accounts for each related
securitization securitization
and the over-collateralization of each related securitization, which is the difference between the outstanding principal
balances of the
related receivables less the principal balance of the outstanding notes issued in the related securitization. On each
monthly payment
date, the 2021-12021-1, 2024-1, and 2024-12025-1 Notes are entitled to interest at the coupon rate and, if necessary, a principal
payment necessary to maintain
a specified minimum collateral ratio.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
Largest changes
We have and will continue tosee in full comparisontohave a substantial amount of indebtedness. AtMarchJune31,30, 2026, we had approximately$3,668.2$4,008.3 million debt outstanding. Such debt consistedconsistedprimarily of$2,992.2$3,131.1 million of securitization trust debt and$467.1$679.9 million of debt from warehouse lines of credit. Our securitizationsecuritizationtrust debt has increased by$5.6$144.5 million while our warehouse lines of credit debt has also increased by$142.3$355.0 million since December 31, 2025 (each net of deferred financing costs). Since 2005, we have offered renewable subordinated notes to the public on a continuous basis, and such notes have maturities that range from six months to 10 years. We had$27.5$28.5 million and $29.0 million in subordinated renewable notes outstanding atMarchJune31,30, 2026, and December 31, 2025, respectively. In June 2021, March 2024, March 2025, and againonin March 2026, we completed a securitization of residual interests from other previously issued securitizations in the amounts of $50 million, $50 million, $65 million, and $50 million, respectively. As ofMarchJune31,30, 2026,$181.4$168.8 million of the residual interest debt remains outstanding.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (1)
We have and will continue
to to
have a substantial amount of indebtedness. At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had approximately $3,668.2$4,008.3 million debt outstanding. Such debt
consisted consisted
primarily of $2,992.2$3,131.1 million of securitization trust debt and $467.1$679.9 million of debt from warehouse lines of credit. Our
securitization securitization
trust debt has increased by $5.6$144.5 million while our warehouse lines of credit debt has also increased by $142.3 $355.0
million since December 31, 2025
(each net of deferred financing costs). Since 2005, we have offered renewable subordinated notes to
the public on a continuous basis,
and such notes have maturities that range from six months to 10 years. We had $27.5$28.5 million and
$29.0 million in subordinated renewable
notes outstanding at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, and December 31, 2025, respectively. In June 2021, March
2024, March 2025, and again onin March 2026,
we completed a securitization of residual interests from other previously issued
securitizations in the amounts of $50 million, $50 million,
$65 million, and $50 million, respectively. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, $181.4 $168.8
million of the residual interest debt remains outstanding.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “____________________________________ (1) All amounts and percentages are based on the amount remaining to be repaid on each automobile contract. The information in the table represents the gross principal amount of all automobile contracts we have purchased, including automobile contracts subsequently sold in securitization transactions that we continue to service. The table does not include certain contracts we have serviced for third parties on which we earn servicing fees only and have no credit risk.”
New heading “(2) We consider an automobile contract delinquent when an obligor fails to make at least 90% of a contractually due payment by the following due date, which date may have been extended within limits specified in the Servicing Agreements. The period of delinquency is based on the number of days payments are contractually past due. Automobile contracts less than 31 days delinquent are not included. The delinquency aging categories shown in the tables reflect the effect of extensions.”
New heading “(3) Amount in repossession represents financed vehicles that have been repossessed but not yet liquidated.”
New heading “(4) Amount in repossession and accounts past due more than 90 days are on non-accrual.”
New heading “_________________________ (1) All amounts and percentages are based on the principal amount scheduled to be paid on each automobile contract.”
New heading “(2) Net charge-offs include the remaining principal balance, after the application of the net proceeds from the liquidation of the vehicle (excluding accrued and unpaid interest) and amounts collected subsequent to the date of charge-off, including some recoveries which have been classified as other income in the accompanying interim consolidated financial statements. June 30, 2026, and June 30, 2025, percentages represent three months ended June 30, 2026, and June 30, 2025, annualized. December 31, 2025, represents 12 months ended December 31, 2025.”
Removed heading “Net Charge-Off Experience (1)”
Removed heading “Total Managed Portfolio (Excludes Third Party Portfolio)”
Removed heading “_________________________”
Largest changes
“(2) Net charge-offs include the remaining principal balance, after the application of the net proceeds from the liquidation of the vehicle (excluding accrued and unpaid interest) and amounts collected subsequent to the date of charge-off, including some recoveries which have been classified as other income in the accompanying interim consolidated financial statements. June 30, 2026, and June 30, 2025, percentages represent three months ended June 30, 2026, and June 30, 2025, annualized. December 31, 2025, represents 12 months ended December 31, 2025.”see in full comparison
“____________________________________ (1) All amounts and percentages are based on the amount remaining to be repaid on each automobile contract. The information in the table represents the gross principal amount of all automobile contracts we have purchased, including automobile contracts subsequently sold in securitization transactions that we continue to service. The table does not include certain contracts we have serviced for third parties on which we earn servicing fees only and have no credit risk.”see in full comparison
“(2) We consider an automobile contract delinquent when an obligor fails to make at least 90% of a contractually due payment by the following due date, which date may have been extended within limits specified in the Servicing Agreements. The period of delinquency is based on the number of days payments are contractually past due. Automobile contracts less than 31 days delinquent are not included. The delinquency aging categories shown in the tables reflect the effect of extensions.”see in full comparison
“_________________________ (1) All amounts and percentages are based on the principal amount scheduled to be paid on each automobile contract.”see in full comparison
“(3) Amount in repossession represents financed vehicles that have been repossessed but not yet liquidated.”see in full comparison
“(4) Amount in repossession and accounts past due more than 90 days are on non-accrual.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (73)
We are a specialty finance
company. Our business is to purchase and service retail automobile contracts originated primarily by franchised automobile dealers and,
to a lesser extent, by select independent dealers in the United States in the sale of new and used automobiles, light trucks and passenger
vans. Through our automobile contract purchases, we provide indirect financing to the customers of dealers who have limited credit histories
or past credit problems, who we refer to as sub-prime customers. We serve as an alternative source of financing for dealers, facilitating
sales to customers who otherwise might not be able to obtain financing from traditional sources, such as commercial banks, credit unions
and the captive finance companies affiliated with major automobile manufacturers. In addition to purchasing installment purchase contracts
directly from dealers, wewe, also, to a lesser extent, originate loans directly to consumers for the refinancing of an existing loan from
other lenders secured by an automobile and have also (i) originated vehicle purchase money loans by lending directly to consumers, (ii)
acquired installment
purchase contracts in four merger and acquisition transactions, and (iii) purchased immaterial amounts of vehicle
purchase money loans
from non-affiliated lenders. In this report, we refer to all of such contracts and loans as “"automobile contracts.”"
We were incorporated and began
our operations in March 1991. From inception through MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we have originated a total of approximately $25.2$26.0 billion of automobile
contracts from dealers, and to a lesser degree, by originating loans secured by automobiles directly with consumers. Our recent history
of contract purchase volumes and managed portfolio levels are shown in the table below. Managed portfolio comprises both contracts we
owned and those we were servicing for third parties.
Contract Purchases and Outstanding Managed Portfolio
Since 1994 we have conducted
108109 term securitizations of automobile contracts that we originated. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, 19 of those securitizations are active and all
all are structured as secured financings. We generally conduct our securitizations on a quarterly basis, near the beginning of each calendar
quarter, resulting in four securitizations per calendar year.
Recent Asset-Backed Term Securitizations
Generally, prior to a securitization
transaction we fund our automobile contract purchases primarily with proceeds from warehouse credit facilities. WeAs currentlyof haveJune 30, 2026 our
short-term
funding capacity ofwas $702.5$725.0 million over threetwo credit facilities. The first credit facility was established in May 2012. This facility
was most recently renewed in July 2024, extending the revolving period to July 2026, with an optional amortization period through July
2027. In addition, the capacity was increased from $200 million to $335 million in December 2024.
In November 2015, we entered into a $100 million
facility with Ares Agent Services, L.P. In June 2022, we increased the capacity of our credit agreement from $100 million to $200 million.
This facility was most recently renewed in March 2024, extending the revolving period to March 2026, followed by an amortization period
to March 2028. In March 2026, the revolving period was extended to April 2026. There was nothing outstanding under this facility at March
31, 2026.
In October 2025, we entered
into a new $167.5 million facility. On April 3, 2026, it amended its two-year revolving credit agreement with Capital One, N.A. to increase
the capacity of the facility. The amendment applies to both Capital One, N.A. and the subordinate lender, and increases the capacity of
the facility from $167.5 million to $390 million. This facility has a two yeartwo-year revolving period to October 2027, with an optional amortization
period period
through April 2029.
In addition, from time to time,
time, we have also completed financings of our residual interests in other securitizations that we and our affiliates previously sponsored.
OnMost recently, in March 4, 2026, we completed a $50 million securitization of residual interests from previously issued securitizations.
In the transaction,
qualified institutional buyers purchased $50.0 million of asset-backed notes secured by an 80% interest in a CPS affiliate
that owns the
residual interests in four CPS securitizations issued from January 2025 through October 2025. The sold notes (“2026-1
Notes”),
issued by CPS Auto Securitization Trust 2026-1, consist of a single class with a coupon of 8.75%.
Our
warehouse credit facilities and our residual interest financings contain various financial covenants requiring certain minimum financial
ratios. Such covenants include maintaining minimum levels of liquidity and net worth and not exceeding maximum leverage levels. In addition,
certain securitization and non-securitization related debt contain cross-default provisions that would allow certain creditors to declare
a default if a default occurred under a different facility. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 we were in compliance with all such financial covenants.
Comparison of Operating Results
for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, with the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025
Revenues. During
the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our revenues were $112.3$121.4 million, an increase of $5.5$11.6 million, or 5.1%10.6% from the prior year
revenue revenue
of 106.9109.8 million. The primary reason for the increase in revenues is the increase in interest income resulting from the
increase in the
average outstanding balance of finance receivables measured at fair value. Revenues for the three months ended March 31,June
30, 2026, did not
include a mark to the recorded value of the finance receivables measured at fair value. Marks are estimates based
on our evaluation of
the appropriate fair value and future earnings rate of existing receivables compared to recently acquired
receivables and increases or
decreases in our estimates of future net losses. In the current period, our re-evaluation of the fair
values of these receivables resulted
in no marks to finance receivables measured at fair value. There was a $3.5$3.0 million mark up to
the fair value portfolio in the prior year
period.
Interest income for the three
months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, increased $6.8$12.8 million, or 6.7%12.1% to $108.7$118.1 million from $101.9$105.4 million in the prior year. The primary reason
for the increase in interest income is the 7.9%13.7% increase in the average balance of our loan portfolio over the prior year period. The
interest yield on our total loan portfolio decreased to 11.3% from 11.4% in the prior year period. The interest yield on receivables measured
at fair value is reduced to take account of expected losses and is therefore less than the yield on other finance receivables. The table
below shows the average balance and interest yield of our loan portfolio for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025:
Other income was $3.6$3.3 million for the three months ended MarchJune
31,30, 2026, compared to $1.4 million for the comparable period in 2025. This $2.2$1.9 million increase was primarily driven by the dealer recoveries
collected for the three months ending MarchJune 31,30, 2026. These dealer recoveries were $2.3$1.8 million for the quarter ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026. There
There were no dealer recoveries in the prior year period. The Company engaged a third party that identifies discrepancies in the values
of the
vehicles that have been repossessed and sold at auction. The third party attempts to collect the amount of the discrepancy from
the dealers
and remits the amounts collected to the Company net of fees charged.
Total operating expenses were
$104.3$112.4 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $100.1$102.8 million for the prior period, an increase of $4.2$9.5 million,
or 4.2%.9.3%. The increase is primarily due to increases in interest expense.
Employee costs were $23.0$23.4 million
during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $25.0$24.4 million for the same quarter in the prior year, a decrease of $2.0 million,$944,000,
or 7.9%.3.9%. The table below summarizes our employees by category as well as contract purchases and units in our managed portfolio as of,
and for the three-month periods ended, MarchJune 31,30, 2026, and 2025.
IncreasesThe increase in headcount among within
our Sales staff during
throughout the three-month periodperiods ended, MarchJune 31,30, 2026, and the decrease from the prior year period in the average employee cost of our Servicing
staff staff,
from June 30, 2025, were the largest contributing factors to the increase in headcount and decrease to employee costs forfrom the three-month
period ended, March
31,June 202630, compared2025 to theJune prior30, year period.2026.
General and administrative expenses
include costs associated with purchasing and servicing our portfolio of finance receivables, including expenses for facilities, credit
services, and telecommunications. General and administrative expenses were $12.9$14.7 million, aan decreaseincrease of $345,000$2.3 million from $12.6$12.4 million
in in
the prior year period.
Interest expense for the three
months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, was $60.1$64.3 million and represented 57.6%57.2% of total operating expenses, compared to $54.9$58.7 million in the previous
year, when it was 54.9%57.1% of total operating expenses. The $5.5 million increase in interest expense compared to the prior year period was
largely due to increases in the average balance of our securitization trust debt, warehouse credit line debt and residual interest financing
debt.
Interest on securitization trust
debt increased by $3.7$4.5 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to the prior period. The average balance of securitization
trust debt increased to $3,127.4$3,272.1 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $2,861.9$2,811.9 million for the three months ended
endedJune March 31,30, 2025. The annualized average rate on our securitization trust debt was 6.2%6.1% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared
compared to 6.3%6.5% in the prior year period. For each quarterly securitization transaction, the blended cost of funds is ultimately the
result of
many factors including the market interest rates for benchmark swaps of various maturities against which our bonds are priced
and the
margin over those benchmarks that investors are willing to accept, which in turn, is influenced by investor demand for our bonds
at the
time of the securitization. These and other factors have resulted in fluctuations in our securitization trust debt interest costs. The
The blended interest rates of our recent securitizations are summarized in the table below:
Interest expense on warehouse
credit line debt wasincreased $6.5by $617,000 to $8.8 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, andcompared to $8.2 million in the same period prior
year period. The increase was primarily due to the higher utilization of our credit lines during the quarter compared to last year. The
average balance
of our warehouse debt was $276.0$445.6 million during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $275.8$353.2 million for the
same period
in 2025. The annualized average rate on our credit line debt was 9.4%7.9% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, consistentcompared with the sameto
period9.3% in the prior year.year period.
Interest expense on subordinated
renewable notes was $685,000$668,000 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026. The average balance of the outstanding subordinated debt was $28.7$28.1
million for the three months MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $26.9$28.0 million for the prior year period. The average yield of subordinated notes
is 9.6%9.5% for boththe currentthree andmonths ended June 30, 2025, compared to 9.7% in the prior year period.
In June 2021, March 2024, March
20, 2025, and again onin March 4, 2026 we completed a securitization of residual interests from other previously issued securitizations
in the
amount of $50 million, $50 million, $65 million, and $50 million, respectively. Interest expense for these residual interest financings
was $4.2$4.7 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $2.7$4.2 million for the same period in 2025.
The following table presents
the components of interest income and interest expense and a net interest yield analysis for the three-month periods ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026,
and 2025:
(1) Average balances are based on month end balances except for warehouse lines of credit, which are based on daily balances.
(2) Annualized net interest income divided by average interest earning assets.
_________________________
Sales expenses consist primarily
of commission-based compensation paid to our employee sales representatives. Our sales representatives earn a salary plus commission based
on volume of contract purchases. Sales expense increased by $641,000$2.6 to $6.6$8.3 million during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, from $5.7
$5.9 million for the same quarter in 2025. We purchased $533.2$757.7 million of new contracts during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared
compared to $451.2$433.0 million in the prior year period.
Occupancy expenses were $1.5
million for the three months ending MarchJune 31,30, 2026, which is up from $1.4 million in the firstsecond quarter of 2025.
Depreciation and amortization
expenses decreased to $225,000 compared tois $249,000 infor both current and the previousprior year.period.
For the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we recorded
recorded income tax expense of $2.5$2.8 million, representing a 31% effective tax rate. In the prior period, our income tax expense was $2.1$2.2 million,
million, representing a 31% effective tax rate.
Comparison of Operating Results for the six months ended June 30, 2026 with the six months ended June 30, 2025 Revenues. During the six months ended June 30, 2026, our revenues were $233.7 million, an increase of $17.1 million, or 7.9% from the prior year revenue of $216.6 million. The primary reason for the increase in revenues is the increase in interest income resulting from the increase in the average outstanding balance of finance receivables measured at fair value. Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2026, did not include a mark to the recorded value of the finance receivables measured at fair value. The marks are estimates based on our evaluation of the appropriate fair value and future earnings rate of existing receivables compared to recently acquired receivables and increases or decreases in our estimates of future net losses. In the current period, our re-evaluation of the fair values of these receivables resulted in no marks to finance receivables measured at fair value. There was a $6.5 million mark up to the fair value portfolio in the prior year period.
Interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2026 increased $19.5 million, or 9.4%, to $226.8 million from $207.3 million in the prior year. The primary reason for the increase in interest income is the 10.8% increase in the average balance of our loan portfolio over the prior year period. The interest yield on our total loan portfolio decreased from 11.4% in the prior year period to 11.3% in the current year period. The interest yield on receivables measured at fair value is reduced to take account of expected losses and is therefore less than the yield on other finance receivables. The table below shows the average balance and interest yield of our loan portfolio for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025:
Other income was $6.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to $2.8 million for the comparable period in 2025. This $4.1 million increase was primarily driven by the dealer recoveries collected for the six months ended June 30, 2026. These dealer recoveries were $4.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026. There were no dealer recoveries in the prior year period.
Expenses. Our operating expenses consist largely of interest expense, employee costs, sales and general and administrative expenses. Interest expense is significantly affected by the volume of automobile contracts we purchased during the trailing 12-month period and the use of our warehouse facilities and asset-backed securitizations to finance those contracts. Employee costs and general and administrative expenses are incurred as applications and automobile contracts are received, processed and serviced. Factors that affect profit margins and net income include changes in the automobile and automobile finance market environments, and macroeconomic factors such as interest rates and changes in the unemployment level.
Employee costs include base salaries, commissions and bonuses paid to employees, and certain expenses related to the accounting treatment of outstanding stock options and are one of our most significant operating expenses. These costs (other than those relating to stock options) generally fluctuate with the level of applications and automobile contracts purchased and serviced.
Other operating expenses consist largely of facilities expenses, telephone and other communication services, credit services, computer services, sales and advertising expenses, and depreciation and amortization.
Total operating expenses were $216.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $202.9 million for the prior period, an increase of $13.8 million, or 6.8%. The increase is primarily due to increases in interest expense. To a lesser extent, increases in sales expense also contributed to the increase in operating expenses during the period.
Employee costs were $46.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to $49.4 million for the same period in the prior year. The table below summarizes our employees by category as well as contract purchases and units in our managed portfolio as of, and for the six-month periods ended, June 30, 2026 and 2025:
The increase in headcount within our Sales staff throughout the six-month periods ended, June 30, 2026, and the decrease in the average employee cost of our Servicing staff from June 30, 2025, were the largest contributing factors to the increase in headcount and decrease to employee costs from the six-month period ended, June 30, 2025 to June 30, 2026.
General and administrative expenses include costs associated with purchasing and servicing our portfolio of finance receivables, including expenses for facilities, credit services, and telecommunications. General and administrative expenses were $27.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $2.6 from $25.0 million in the prior year period.
Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was $124.3 million, compared to $113.6 million in the previous year, an increase of $10.7 million.
Interest on securitization trust debt increased by $8.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the prior period. The average balance of securitization trust debt increased to $3,199.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to $2,836.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The annualized average rate on our securitization trust debt was 6.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to 6.4% in the prior year period. For each quarterly securitization transaction, the blended cost of funds is ultimately the result of many factors including the market interest rates for benchmark swaps of various maturities against which our bonds are priced and the margin over those benchmarks that investors are willing to accept, which in turn, is influenced by investor demand for our bonds at the time of the securitization. These and other factors have resulted in fluctuations in our securitization trust debt interest costs. The blended interest rates of our recent securitizations are summarized in the table below:
Interest expense on warehouse credit line debt increased by $569,000 to $15.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $14.7 million in the prior year period. The average balance of our warehouse debt was $361.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $314.7 million for the same period in 2025. The annualized average rate on our credit line debt was 8.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to 9.4% in the prior year period.
Interest expense on subordinated renewable notes was $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026. The average balance of the outstanding subordinated debt increased by $890,000 to $28.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $27.5 million for the prior year. The average yield of subordinated notes was 9.5% in the current compare to 9.7% prior period.
In June 2021, March 2024, March 2025, and again in March 2026 we completed a securitization of residual interests from other previously issued securitizations in the amount of $50 million, $50 million, $65 million, and $50 million, respectively. Interest expense on the residual interest financing was $8.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to $7.0 million for the same period in 2025.
The following table presents the components of interest income and interest expense and a net interest yield analysis for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2026 and 2025:
(1) Average balances are based on month end balances except for warehouse lines of credit, which are based on daily balances.
(2) Annualized net interest income divided by average interest earning assets.
Sales expenses consist primarily of commission-based compensation paid to our employee sales representatives. Our sales representatives earn a salary plus commissions based on volume of contract purchases. Sales expense increased to $14.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $11.6 million in the same period in 2025. We purchased $1,290.9 million of new contracts during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to $884.2 million in the prior year period.
Occupancy expenses was $3.0 million for the six months ending June 30, 2026, which is up from $2.8 million for the same period in 2025.
Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased to $474,000 compared to $498,000 in the previous year.
For the six months ended June 30, 2026, we recorded income tax expense of $5.3 million, representing a 31% effective tax rate. In the prior period, our income tax expense was $4.3 million, representing a 31% effective tax rate.
____________________________________ (1) All amounts and percentages are based on the amount remaining to be repaid on each automobile contract. The information in the table represents the gross principal amount of all automobile contracts we have purchased, including automobile contracts subsequently sold in securitization transactions that we continue to service. The table does not include certain contracts we have serviced for third parties on which we earn servicing fees only and have no credit risk.
(2) We consider an automobile contract delinquent when an obligor fails to make at least 90% of a contractually due payment by the following due date, which date may have been extended within limits specified in the Servicing Agreements. The period of delinquency is based on the number of days payments are contractually past due. Automobile contracts less than 31 days delinquent are not included. The delinquency aging categories shown in the tables reflect the effect of extensions.
(3) Amount in repossession represents financed vehicles that have been repossessed but not yet liquidated.
(4) Amount in repossession and accounts past due more than 90 days are on non-accrual.
_________________________ (1) All amounts and percentages are based on the principal amount scheduled to be paid on each automobile contract.
(2) Net charge-offs include the remaining principal balance, after the application of the net proceeds from the liquidation of the vehicle (excluding accrued and unpaid interest) and amounts collected subsequent to the date of charge-off, including some recoveries which have been classified as other income in the accompanying interim consolidated financial statements. June 30, 2026, and June 30, 2025, percentages represent three months ended June 30, 2026, and June 30, 2025, annualized. December 31, 2025, represents 12 months ended December 31, 2025.
____________________________________
CPSS insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 5 filings (3 insiders, 6 trade dates, 144,500 shares, about $1.4M). Net open-market shares: -144,500 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$1.4M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | Robinson Teri |
Gift | 660 | — | — |
| 2026-09-01 | Jackson Noel |
Open-market sale | 7,500 | $9.31 | $69.8K |
| 2026-09-01 | Jackson Noel |
Option exercise | 7,500 | $2.47 | $18.5K |
| 2026-08-26 | Bradley Charles E Jr |
Open-market sale | 125,000 | $9.46 | $1.2M |
| 2026-08-12 | Ralston Catrina Marie |
Open-market sale | 3,617 | $9.50 | $34.4K |
| 2026-08-10 | Ralston Catrina Marie |
Open-market sale | 916 | $9.50 | $8.7K |
| 2026-08-07 | Ralston Catrina Marie |
Open-market sale | 467 | $9.50 | $4.4K |
| 2026-08-06 | Lavin Michael T. |
Gift | 99,304 | — | — |
| 2026-08-06 | Lavin Michael T. |
Option exercise | 45,829 | $2.47 | $113.2K |
| 2026-08-06 | Lavin Michael T. |
Option exercise | 28,647 | $3.53 | $101.1K |
| 2026-08-06 | Lavin Michael T. |
Option exercise | 61,353 | $3.53 | $216.6K |
| 2026-08-06 | Lavin Michael T. |
Shares withheld for tax | 36,525 | $9.57 | $349.5K |
| 2026-08-06 | Lavin Michael T. |
Gift | 99,304 | — | — |
| 2026-08-06 | Rayhill Brian |
Shares withheld for tax | 11,066 | $9.57 | $105.9K |
| 2026-08-06 | Rayhill Brian |
Option exercise | 30,000 | $3.53 | $105.9K |
| 2026-08-05 | Bradley Charles E Jr |
Option exercise | 300,000 | $3.53 | $1.1M |
| 2026-08-05 | Bharwani Denesh |
Option exercise | 60,000 | $3.53 | $211.8K |
| 2026-08-05 | Terry Chris |
Option exercise | 60,000 | $3.53 | $211.8K |
| 2026-08-05 | Terry Chris |
Shares withheld for tax | 27,787 | $9.18 | $255.1K |
| 2026-08-04 | Baumeister Michele L |
Shares withheld for tax | 14,171 | $9.31 | $131.9K |
| 2026-08-04 | Baumeister Michele L |
Option exercise | 30,000 | $3.53 | $105.9K |
| 2026-08-03 | Reynoso Lisette |
Shares withheld for tax | 1,839 | $9.60 | $17.7K |
| 2026-08-03 | Reynoso Lisette |
Option exercise | 5,000 | $3.53 | $17.6K |
| 2026-08-03 | Robinson Teri |
Option exercise | 28,541 | $3.53 | $100.7K |
| 2026-08-03 | Robinson Teri |
Option exercise | 31,459 | $3.53 | $111.1K |
| 2026-08-03 | Robinson Teri |
Gift | 43,588 | — | — |
| 2026-08-03 | Robinson Teri |
Gift | 43,588 | — | — |
| 2026-08-03 | Robinson Teri |
Shares withheld for tax | 16,412 | $9.60 | $157.6K |
| 2026-08-03 | Ralston Catrina Marie |
Shares withheld for tax | 12,459 | $9.60 | $119.6K |
| 2026-08-03 | Ralston Catrina Marie |
Option exercise | 30,000 | $3.53 | $105.9K |
| 2026-07-24 | Wood Daniel S |
Option exercise | 30,000 | $3.53 | $105.9K |
| 2026-07-24 | Wood Daniel S |
Shares withheld for tax | 11,207 | $9.45 | $105.9K |
| 2026-07-03 | Robinson Teri |
Gift | 660 | — | — |
| 2026-06-30 | Ryan Susan |
Option exercise | 30,000 | $3.53 | $105.9K |
| 2026-06-30 | Ryan Susan |
Shares withheld for tax | 11,641 | $9.60 | $111.8K |
| 2026-06-26 | Gonel Charles E. |
Shares withheld for tax | 11,095 | $10.00 | $111.0K |
| 2026-06-26 | Gonel Charles E. |
Option exercise | 30,000 | $3.53 | $105.9K |
| 2026-06-16 | Jackson Noel |
Open-market sale | 7,000 | $9.63 | $67.4K |
| 2026-06-16 | Jackson Noel |
Option exercise | 7,000 | $3.53 | $24.7K |
| 2026-04-27 | Schween Steven |
Option exercise | 30,000 | $2.47 | $74.1K |
Well-known investors holding CPSS (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 339,958 | $3.3M | 0.0% | Reduced 5% |