CXM 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Sprinklr, Inc. · NYSE · Services-Prepackaged Software · CIK 1569345 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “We cannot guarantee that our share repurchase program will be fully consummated or that it will enhance long-term stockholder value. Share repurchases could also increase the volatility of the trading price of our common stock and could diminish our cash reserves.”
Largest changes
“As we grow and continue to add new third-party data centers and cloud computing providers and expand the capacity of our existing third-party data centers and cloud computing providers, we may move or transfer our data and our customers’ data. Despite precautions taken during this process, any unsuccessful data transfers may impair the delivery of our Unified-CXM platform. …”see in full comparison
These laws continue to scale, reform and evolve. Europe and other jurisdictions have proposed or enacted laws requiring data to be localized in some limited circumstances or limiting the transfer of personal data to other countries. In addition, some customers have internal policy requirementssee in full comparisonwhichor impose contractual obligations that may differ from, or be more burdensome than, applicable regulations. For example, European and other data protection laws, including the GDPR, place some restrictions on the ability of companies to freely transfer personal data to countries deemed to be inadequate for privacy purposes, and there are fairly rigorous restrictions regarding transfers of personal data from China. Other jurisdictions may also adopt stringent data localization and cross-border data transfer requirements and, in many circumstances, these may be requirements outside of the scope of privacy law, including industry-specific or national security requirements. With respect to data transfers under the GDPR, although there are currently various mechanisms that may be used to enable the transfer of personal data from the European Economic Area (“EEA”) andUKUnited Kingdom to the United States in compliance with the law, such as the EU-US Data Privacy Framework and the UK extension thereto (to which we are an active participant) and theEU’sEuropean Union’s standard contractual clauses, these mechanisms continue to be subject to legal challenges, and there is no continued assurance that we can satisfy or rely on these measures to lawfully transfer personal data to the United States or other countries with “inadequate” data protection regimes without the potential for future challenge. If there is no lawful manner for us to transfer personal data from the EEA, theUK,United Kingdom, or other jurisdictions outside of the origin territory, or if the requirements for a legally-compliant transfer are too onerous, we could face significant adverse consequences, including the prohibition on further transfers (including remote access by employees in support teams in certain regions), the interruption or degradation of our operations, the need to relocate part of or all of our business or data processing activities to other jurisdictions at significant expense, increased exposure to regulatory actions, substantial fines and penalties, the inability to transfer data and work with partners, vendors and other third parties, and injunctions against our processing or transferring of personal data necessary to operate our business. Additionally,companies that transfer personal data out of the EEA and UK to other jurisdictions, particularly to the United States, can be subject to increased scrutiny from regulators, individual litigants, and activist groups. Regulators in the United States, such asthe U.S. Department ofJustice,Justicealsoissuedareaincreasinglyrulescrutinizing certain personal data transfers and have proposed and enacted certain data localization requirements, such as, for example,entitled theBiden Administration’s executive orderPreventing Access toAmericans’ BulkU.S. Sensitive Personal Data andUnited StatesGovernment-Related Data by Countries ofConcern.Concern or Covered Persons, which places additional restriction on certain data transactions involving countries of concern (e.g., China, Russia, Iran) and covered persons (i.e., individuals and entities who are designated as such by the U.S. Attorney General or considered “foreign persons” and are majority owned by, organized under the laws of, a primary resident in, or a contractor of, a covered person or country of concern, as applicable) that may impact certain business activities such as vendor engagements, sale or sharing of data, employment of certain individuals, and investor agreements. Violations of the rule could lead to significant civil and criminal fines and penalties.
•general economic, political and market conditions and overall fluctuations in the financial markets in the United States and abroad, including as a result of public healthsee in full comparisoncrisescrises, fluctuations in inflation or interest rates, the imposition of tariffs in the U.S. and abroad or geographical tensions and wars, such as the Russia-Ukrainewarwar, the 2026 Iran conflict, and other military conflicts in theIsrael-HamasMiddlewarEast (including any escalation or geopolitical expansion of these conflicts); and
“Trade disputes, trade restrictions, tariffs and other political tensions between the U.S. and other countries may also exacerbate unfavorable macroeconomic conditions, including inflationary pressures, foreign exchange volatility, financial market instability, and economic recessions or downturns, which may also negatively impact customer demand for our services, delay renewals or limit expansion opportunities with existing customers, limit our access to capital, or otherwise negatively impact our business and operations. In addition, retaliatory trade policies or anti-U.S. …”see in full comparison
Uncertainty in the legal regulatory regime relating to AI, as well as nuances and variationsee in full comparisononin AI regulations from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, may require significant resources to modify and maintain business practices to comply with U.S. and foreign laws, the nature of which cannot be determined at this time as they continue to rapidly evolve and solidify. Several jurisdictions around theglobeglobe, including Europe and certain U.S. states, havealreadyproposed,proposedenacted orenactedarelawsconsidering laws, regulations or guidelines governingAI.theFordevelopmentexample,and use of AI, such as theEUEuropean Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (“EU AI Act”),hasColorado’scomeArtificialintoIntelligenceforceAct anditstheprovisionsCaliforniaareConsumergraduallyPrivacybecomingActeffective,regulationswhichregarding automated decision-making. For example, the EU AI Act imposes a number of obligations on various parties related to the development and use of certain AI-basedsystems,systems. Under the EU AI Act, non-compliant companies may be subject to administrative fines of up to 35 million Euros or 7% of a company’s total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is the higher. Existing andotherfuturejurisdictions are beginning to adopt or prepare for adoption of similar laws. TheseAI-related laws may be more restrictive than the EU AI Act and may rendertheour use of such technologies challenging. While we aim to develop and use AI responsibly by attempting to identify and mitigate any issues associated with fairness, bias, transparency, or ethical or legal use of AI, the laws relating to AI are still evolving and guidance is lacking. As a result, we may be unsuccessful in identifying or resolving such issues. Further, use of our AI systems for unintended or improper use cases by customer users may alter the associated legal obligations upon Sprinklr, without our knowledge. We may not be able to detect, mitigate and remediate such misuse, and limitations of liability in contracts may be inadequate to address legal liability, fines, penalties and other regulatory actions resulting from such misuse. Additionally, certain privacy laws extend rights to consumers (such as the right to delete certain personal data) and regulate automated decision making, which may be incompatible with our use of AI, particularly training AI using personal data. These obligations may make it harder for us to conduct our business using AI, develop innovative AI models and create potential for regulatory fines or penalties, require us to change our business practices, retrain our AI, prevent or limit our creation and use of AI and/or generative AI, or delete or require us to disgorge certain algorithms. For example, theUSU.S. Federal Trade Commission has required other companies to turn over or delete or disgorge valuable insights or trainings generated through the use of AI, or the AI models or algorithms themselves, where they allege the company has violated privacy and consumer protection laws.
“We also may become subject to new laws that regulate non-personal data. For example, the European Union’s Data Act imposes certain data and cloud service interoperability and switching obligations to enable users to switch between cloud service providers without undue delay or cost, as well as certain requirements concerning cross-border international transfers of, and governmental access to, non-personal data outside the EEA. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (84)
•We have incurred significant net losses in the pastpast, and we may not be able to generate sufficient revenue to achieve and maintain profitability.
•Our directors, executive officersofficers, major stockholders and their respective affiliates are able to exert significant control over us, which limits your ability to influence the outcome of important transactions, including a change of control.
•provide our customers with effective and efficient implementations, as well as on-goingongoing support that meets their needs;
Guidance is necessarily speculative in nature, and it can be expected that some or all of the assumptions of the guidance furnished by us will not materialize or will vary significantly from actual results. In particular, guidance offered in periods of extreme uncertainty, such as the uncertainty caused by macroeconomic conditions, is inherently more speculative in nature than guidance offered in periods of relative stability. For example, we recorded a higher than expected provision for credit losses in the second quarter of fiscal year 2025, which caused certain of our operating results to fall below the guidance ranges provided for such metrics in the previous period. Accordingly, any guidance with respect to our projected financial performance is necessarily only an estimate of what management believes is realizable as of the date the guidance is given. Actual results will vary from the guidance, and the variations may be material. Investors should also recognize that the reliability of any forecasted financial data will diminish the fartherfurther in the future that the data is forecasted.
In addition, we expect that an increasing focus on customer satisfaction and the growth of various communications channels and new technologies will profoundly impact the market for Unified-CXM solutions. We believe that enterprises increasingly are looking for flexible solutions that bridge across traditionally separate systems for experience management, marketing automation and customer relationship management. We may be unable to effectively adapt our platform and approach to respond to changes in technology and customer needs. For example, in recent periods, we have experienced difficulties with managing the implementation of certain larger CCaaS projects, which has resulted in increased customer dissatisfaction anddissatisfaction, loss of certain customers.customers and a delay in recognizing revenue associated with certain of these projects. In addition, customers have in the past and may continue in the future to slow their rate of expansion or reduce their number of licenses. If we are unable to meet this demand to manage customer experiences through flexible solutions designed to address a broad range of needs, or if we otherwise fail to achieve more widespread market acceptance of our Unified-CXM platform, our business, results of operations, financial condition and growth prospects may be adversely affected.
While we do not believe that any of our competitors currently offer a full suite of Unified-CXM solutions that competes across the breadth of our Unified-CXM platform, certain features of our Unified-CXM platform compete in particular segments of the overall Unified-CXM category. Our main competitors include, among others, experience management solutions, including social media management and social listening solutions, home-grown tools, adjacentcustomer Unified-CXMservice and support solutions, such as social messaging, conversational and AgenicAgentic AI, CCaaS solutions, customer service and support solutions, customer feedback management and Voice of the Customer solutions, content marketing, and social advertising solutions, and consulting firms and customer relationship management and enterprise resource planning solutions. Further, other established SaaS providers and other technology companies not currently focused on Unified-CXM may expand their services to compete with us. Some of our competitors may be able to offer products or functionality similar to ours at a more attractive price than we can or do, including by integrating or bundling such products with their other product offerings. Additionally, some potential customers, particularly large organizations, have elected, and may in the future elect, to develop their own internal Unified-CXM solutions.
Finally, a key element of our Unified-CXM value proposition is our ability to integrate solicited and unsolicited sources of structured and unstructured data. An important part of this capability is our social listening functionality, which is dependent on the application programming interfaces (“APIs”) of different third-party channel providers (e.g., X, Meta, Snap, etc.). If those channel providers significantly alter their API capabilities, technical or legal limitations, or monetization models, that could have a negative impact on our overall value proposition.
We generally recognize subscription revenue from customers ratably over the terms of their contracts and a majority of our revenue is derived from subscriptions that have terms of onetwo to three years. As a result, a portion of the revenue we report in each quarter is derived from the recognition of deferred revenue relating to subscriptions entered into during previous quarters. Consequently, a decline in new or renewed subscriptions in any singleone quarterperiod may havenot abe smallimmediately impactreflected on ouras revenue results for that quarter. However, such a decline will negatively affect our revenue in future quarters.period. Accordingly, the effect of significant downturns in sales and market acceptance of our Unified-CXM platform and potential changes in our pricing policies or rate of expansion or retention may not be fully reflected in our results of operations until future periods. For example, the impact of current economic uncertainties may cause customers to request better pricing, which may not be reflected immediately in our results of operations. Our subscription model also makes it difficult for us to rapidly increase our revenue through additional sales in any period, as revenue from new customers must be recognized over the applicable subscription term. In addition, customers have in the past and may continue in the future to slow their rate of expansion or reduce their number of licenses. We also may be unable to reduce our cost structure in line with a significant deterioration in sales. In addition, a majority of our costs are expensed as incurred, while revenue is recognized over the term of the agreements with our customers. As a result, increased growth in the number of our customers could continue to result in our recognition of more costs than revenue in the earlier periods of the terms of our agreements. Our subscription model also makes it difficult for us to rapidly increase our revenue through additional sales in any period, as revenue from new customers must be recognized over the applicable subscription term.
We currently serve our customers from third-party data centers and cloud computing providers located around the world. Some of these facilities are located in areas prone to natural disasters and may experience events such as earthquakes, floods, fires, severe weather events, power loss, computer or telecommunication failures, service outages or losses, and similar events. They also may be subject to break-ins, sabotage, intentional acts of vandalism and similar misconduct or cybersecurity issues, including attacks enhanced or facilitated by artificial intelligence (“AI”), human error, terrorism, improper operation, unauthorized entry and data loss. For example, in connection with the 2026 Iran conflict, multiple availability zones within a third-party data center region in the United Arab Emirates on which we relied was damaged by Iranian drone strikes, resulting in the inaccessibility and potential loss of certain customer data. While our systems are designed with redundancy resilience measures, extraordinary events affecting regional infrastructure, particularly those outside our reasonable control, such as armed conflict, geopolitical instability, or damage to third‑party facilities, may exceed the designed tolerances of such systems. Although we have sought to implement alternative backup arrangements and relocated data regions in connection with the 2026 Iran conflict, and may in the future take similar actions in response to the current or future conflicts or other force majeure events, we cannot provide assurance that these locations (including back up locations) will not also be adversely impacted, or that data will not be destroyed, in the course of the current or future conflicts or other force majeure events. In addition, the effectiveness and timing of any recovery or mitigation efforts may depend on factors outside our control, including the recovery timelines and data durability assurances of third‑party cloud service providers.
We have incurred costs in connection with the 2026 Iran conflict, and may in the future incur additional and unanticipated costs in connection with the current or future conflicts or other force majeure events, which may be significant, in responding to or mitigating the effects of such events, including through emergency data transfers, changes to hosting locations, increased infrastructure spend or the relocation of our employees or operations. Any of these impacts could harm our reputation, adversely affect customer relationships, particularly with regulated or public‑sector customers, and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We currently serve our customers from third-party data centers and cloud computing providers located around the world. Some of these facilities may be located in areas prone to natural disasters and may experience events such as earthquakes, floods, fires, severe weather events, power loss, computer or telecommunication failures, service outages or losses, and similar events. They also may be subject to break-ins, sabotage, intentional acts of vandalism and similar misconduct or cybersecurity issues, including attacks enhanced or facilitated by artificial intelligence (“AI”) human error, terrorism, improper operation, unauthorized entry and data loss. Our data center operations also rely heavily on the availability of electricity, which also comes from third-party providers. If we or the third-party data center and cloud computing provider facilities that we use to deliver our services were to experience a major power outage or if the cost of electricity were to increase significantly, our operations and financial results could be harmed. If we or our third-party data centers and cloud service provider facilities were to experience a major power outage, we or they would have to rely on back-up generators, which might not work properly or might not provide an adequate supply during a major power outage. Such a power outage could result in a significant disruption of our business. In the event of significant physical damage to one of these data centers, it may take a significant period of time to achieve full resumption of our services, and our disaster recovery planning may not account for all eventualities. We also may incur significant costs for using alternative equipment or taking other actions in preparation for, or in reaction to, events that damage the data centers and equipment that we use. Although we carry business interruption insurance, it may not be sufficient to compensate us for the potentially significant losses, including the potential harm to the future growth of our business that may result from interruptions in our services or products.
AsIn weaddition, grow and continue to add newour third-party data centers and cloud computing providers have experienced, and expandmay in the future experience, interruptions, delays and outages in service and availability from time to time due to a variety of factors, including infrastructure changes, human or software errors, website hosting disruptions, and capacity constraints. Consequently, we may be subject to service disruptions, as well as failures to provide adequate support, for reasons that are outside of our existingdirect third-partycontrol. dataSuch centersservice and cloud computing providers, we may move or transfer our data and our customers’ data. Despite precautions taken during this process, any unsuccessful data transfers may impair the delivery of our Unified-CXM platform. Any damage to, or failure of, our systems, or those of our third-party data centers or cloud computing providers or the systems of a customer that hosts our software in their private cloud,disruptions could result in interruptions onto our Unified-CXMservices platformto customers or damage to, or loss or compromise of, our data and our customers’ data, including personal data. Any impairment of our or our customers’ data or interruptions in the functioning of our Unified-CXM platform, whetherservices due to damageinterruptions, to,delays or failureoutages of,in service from our third-party data centers,centers and cloud computing providers or the cloud computing providers of our customers or unsuccessful data transfers, may reduce our revenue, increase our operations costs, result in significant fines, cause us to issue credits or pay penalties, subject us to claims for indemnification and other claims, litigation or disputes, result in regulatory investigations or other inquiries, cause our customers to terminate their subscriptions and adversely affect our reputation, renewal rates and our ability to attract new customers. Our business will also be harmed if our existing and potential customers believe that our Unified-CXM platform is unreliable or not secure.
Our data center operations also rely heavily on the availability of electricity, which also comes from third-party providers. If we or the third-party data center and cloud computing provider facilities that we use to deliver our services were to experience a major power outage or if the cost of electricity were to increase significantly, our operations and financial results could be harmed. If we or our third-party data centers and cloud service provider facilities were to experience a major power outage, we or they would have to rely on back-up generators, which might not work properly or might not provide an adequate supply during a major power outage. Such a power outage could result in a significant disruption of our business. In the event of significant physical damage to one of these data centers, it may take a significant period of time to achieve full resumption of our services, and our disaster recovery planning may not account for all eventualities. We also may incur significant costs for using alternative equipment or taking other actions in preparation for, or in reaction to, events that damage the data centers and equipment that we or the third parties with whom we work use. Although we carry business interruption insurance, it may not be sufficient to compensate us for the potentially significant losses, including the potential harm to the future growth of our business that may result from interruptions in our services or products.
As we grow and continue to add new third-party data centers and cloud computing providers and expand the capacity of our existing third-party data centers and cloud computing providers, we may move or transfer our data and our customers’ data. Despite precautions taken during this process, any unsuccessful data transfers may impair the delivery of our Unified-CXM platform. Any damage to, or failure of, our systems, or those of our third-party data centers or cloud computing providers or the systems of a customer that hosts our software in their private cloud, could result in interruptions on our Unified-CXM platform or damage to, or loss or compromise of, our data and our customers’ data, including personal data. Any impairment of our or our customers’ data or interruptions in the functioning of our Unified-CXM platform, whether due to damage to, or failure of, third-party data centers, cloud computing providers or the cloud computing providers of our customers, or unsuccessful data transfers, may reduce our revenue, increase our operations costs, result in significant fines, cause us to issue credits or pay penalties, subject us to claims for indemnification and other claims, litigation or disputes, result in regulatory investigations or other inquiries, cause our customers to terminate their subscriptions and adversely affect our reputation, renewal rates and our ability to attract new customers. Our business will also be harmed if our existing and potential customers believe that our Unified-CXM platform is unreliable or not secure.
Further, our leases and other agreements with data centers and cloud computing providers expire at various times, and the owners of our data center facilities and cloud computing providers have no obligation to renew their agreements with us on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, which exposes us to the potential for significant cost increases. Additionally, certain of our data center and cloudingcloud computing provider agreements may be terminable for convenience by the counterparty. If services are interrupted at any of these facilities or providers, such agreements are terminated, or we are unable to renew these agreements on commercially reasonable terms or at all, or if one of our data center or cloud computing providers is acquired or encounters financial difficulties, including bankruptcy, we may be required to transfer our data, servers and other infrastructure to new data centers and cloud computing providers, and we may incur significant costs and possible service interruptions in connection with doing so. In addition, if we do not accurately plan for our data center and cloud computing capacity requirements and we experience significant strains on our data center and cloud computing capacity, we may experience delays and additional expenses in arranging new data center and cloud computing arrangements, and our customers could experience service outages that may subject us to financial liabilities due to, for example, breach of Serviceservice Levellevel Agreements (SLAs)agreements or other commitments, result in customer losses and dissatisfaction, and materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
Our future success will depend on our ability to adapt and innovate. To attract new customers and increase revenue from our existing customers, we will need to enhance and improve our existing platform and introduce new products, features and functionality. Enhancements and new products that we develop may not be introduced in a timely or cost-effective manner, may contain errors or defects, and may have interoperability difficulties with our Unified-CXM platform or other products. Furthermore, while we generally expect that enhancements and improvements to our products will attract new customers, certain of our customer agreements restrict our ability to materially change the features and functionality of our products,products or may obligate us to specific configurations or requirements, including in some cases, prohibiting the use of AI or generative AI in our products, which could result in violations of those customer agreements, or increased operational difficulties and costs due to our need to deploy different versionversions of our products to different customers, i.e.,such enableas through enabling or disabledisabling certain features, or failure ofcause such customers not to renew their agreements (and therefore, loss in revenue from such customers) as a result of our new products, features, and functionality. We have in the past experienced, and may in the future experience, delays in our planned release dates of new products, features and functionality, and there can be no assurance that these developments will be released according to schedule. We also have invested, and may continue to invest, in the acquisition of complementary businesses and technologies that we believe will enhance our Unified-CXM platform. If we are unable to successfully develop, release, acquire or integrate new products, features and functionality, or enhance our existing platform to meet the needs of our existing or potential customers in a timely and effective manner, or if a customer is not satisfied with the quality of work performed by us or with the technical support services rendered, our customers may delay or withhold payment to us, cancel their agreements with us, elect not to renew, or make service credit claims, warranty claims or other claims against us, and we could lose future sales. The occurrence of any of these events could result in diminishing demand for our solutions, a reduction ofin our revenues, an increase in our provision for credit losses or in collection cycles for accounts receivable or could cause us to incur the risk or expense of litigation.
We use artificial intelligenceAI in our products and operations, including agentic AI, which may result in operational challenges, legal liability, reputational concerns and competitive risks.
We use AI tools in our business operations for internal and external uses. Our development and use of advanced AI technologies, including generative and agentic AI, may expose us to additional risks. We are investing in and seeking to accelerate AI capabilities, including agentic AI systems that may operate with limited human intervention and require access to our internal systems, customer data, or third‑party services. Such technologies may increase the risk of unintended or harmful outcomes, reduced transparency or explainability, security or access‑control failures, and present challenges in monitoring autonomous behavior and ensuring accountability and compliance. If we are unable to effectively design, deploy, govern, or control these technologies, our business, reputation, and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We use AI tools in our business operations for internal and external uses. Specifically, our employees and personnel may use AI technologies to support their work and our internal business operations, includingincluding, for exampleexample, to generateassist in daily tasks including, among other things, generating source code used in our products and systems. Output from generative AI may infringe on third-party intellectual property rights without us being aware. Moreover, advanced AI tools, which may produce content indistinguishable from that generated by humans, have a number of benefits, risks, and liabilities, some still unknown. Recent decisions of governmental entities and courts (such as the U.S. Copyright Office, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) interpret U.S. copyright and patent law as limited to protecting works and inventions created by human authors and inventors, respectively. We are therefore unlikely to be able to obtain U.S. copyright or patent protection for works or inventions wholly created by a generative AI tool, and our ability to obtain U.S. copyright and patent protection for source code, text, images, inventions, or other materials, which are developed with some use of AI tools, such as generative AI, may be limited, if available at all. Likewise, the availability of intellectual property protections in other countries is similarly unclear. Additionally, our use of third-party generative AI tools to develop source code, text, images, inventions, or other materials may expose us to greater risks than utilizing contracted human developers, as third-party generative AI vendors typically domay not provide warranties or indemnities with respect to the output generated by such generative AI tools, and generative AI tools may also provide output that appears correct but is erroneous. Furthermore, while we have policies in place to facilitate the use of approved AI tools, some generativeunapproved AI tools may be offeredused in ways or under terms that do not protect the confidentiality of the prompts or inputs that users submit to such tools and may use prompts or inputs to train shared AI models, potentially resulting in third-party users receiving outputs containing information from prompts or inputs (including confidential, competitive, proprietary, or personal data) that wewere submitted to the tool.
Our use of generative AI tools to generate code also may also present additional security risks because the generated source code may contain security vulnerabilities. Additionally, the vendors of these generative AI tools may fail to comply with their contractual obligations to us regarding the confidentiality or security of any data or other inputs provided to such vendor or outputs generated by their generative AI tools. Our sensitiveSensitive information could be leaked, disclosed, or revealed as a result of or in connection with our employees’, personnel’s, or vendors’ or customers’ use of third-party generative AI tools or AI technologies generally.generally, within the Sprinklr platform or otherwise.
In addition to the use of generative AI in our internal operations, including for generation of code, weWe also use our own proprietary AI-based features within our products,products and have incorporated generative AI into our product offerings through third-party vendors, which has the potential to result in adverse effects to our financial condition, results or reputation. GenerativeOur AI features and services leverage existing and widely available technologies, such as those owned by Microsoft Azure, OpenAI or alternative large language model providers. The use of generative AI technology and processes at scale is relatively new and may lead to challenges, concerns and risks that are significant or that we mayare not be able to predict, especially ifas our use of these technologies in our products and services becomesis likely to become more important to our operations over time.
UseThe use of AIAI, orincluding generative AIand agentic AI, in our products and services may be difficult to deploy successfully due to operational issues inherent to the nature of such technologies, including the development, maintenance and operation of deep learning datasets. Further, some of our customers, especially those in highly regulated industries, may be reluctant or unwilling to adopt AI and/or generative AI products.products or may be unwilling to do so without significant commitments from us or until after completing thorough, resource-intensive due diligence. Accordingly, adoption of generative AI features in our products and marketing our products as AIAI-native, AI-based or generative AIAI-powered products could reduce or delay customer adoption. For example, AI and generative AI tools use machine learning techniques, including, but not limited to, algorithms, natural language processing and/or content creationcreation, which, depending on the model and the intended use case, may lead to flawed, biased, unexplained, and inaccurate results or outputs, which could lead to customer rejection or skepticism of such products or even potentially claims against us arising from customer reliance on erroneous outputor infringing outputs to its detriment. Emerging ethical issues surround the use of AI and generative AI, orand if our deployment or development of AI and/or generative AI becomes controversial or is successfully and adversely challenged by our current or prospective customers, we may be subject to reputational risk. Any sensitive information (including confidential, competitive, proprietary, or personal data) that our customers input into the third-party generative AI features in our products (or that we input into generative AI tools that we use) could be leaked, disclosed to others or used for improper purposes, including if sensitive information is used to train our own AI or the third parties’ generative AI models, in spite of and in breach of our contractual agreements. While we have processes and practices designedintended to ensuredemonstrate that we have the necessary rights to use source training data for training our AI, we may not in every instance be able to confirm that all of the information contained in such datasets has been obtained with the necessary permissions for us tominimal use for purposes of our AI. For example, we may use publicly available data to train our AI that contains information that was unlawfully acquired from third parties without our knowledge. While we have some tools that can be leveraged to help us avoid using personal data to train or fine-tune our AI, and it may be difficult for us to avoid or identify all instances where personal data may behave been in the scope of the training data, even though it is not necessarily required.required for training. If we were to receive claims from third parties asserting rights against our use of certain datasets used to train our AI, it may be difficult or impossible to disentangle our trained models or unpick our training data from the subject matter of the claims.
The disclosure and use of personal and other regulated or protected data in AI technologies is subject to various privacy laws and other privacycontractual, legal or regulatory obligations. Further, countries and states are applying their data and consumer protection laws to AI technologies, and particularly generative AI and interactive chatbots. Additionally, where our products ingest personal data or where they make connections using such data, these AI or generative AI processes may reveal or generate other personal or sensitive data over which we could lose control or impair our ability to fulfill certain data subject requests in compliance with certain privacy laws or contractual obligations to our customers, such as requests to delete certain personal data ingested by the product. Further, unauthorized use or misuse of generative AI by our employees, customers or others, including violation of internal policies or procedures or guidelines or contractual agreements and terms (including internal and external Acceptable Use policies or other policies and third-party terms), may result in disclosure or misuse of confidential company and customer data, reputational harm, privacy law violations, legal and contractual liability, or regulatory actions, including algorithmic disgorgement. Improper development, deployment, or onward use of AI and generative AI has the potential to result in biased outcomes and could lead to decisions that could harm certain individuals (or classes of individuals), and adversely impact their rights, employment, and ability to obtain certain pricing, products, services, or benefits. In addition, use of generative AI may also lead to novel and urgent cybersecurity risks (such as if a bad actor “poisons” the generative AI with bad inputs or prompt injections or logic), including the misuse of personal or business confidential data, which may adversely affect our operations and reputation.
As a result, the evolving development, use and integration of generative AI into our products and operations may not be successful despite expending significant time and monetary resources to attempt to make it successful. Our investments in deploying such technologies may be substantial, and they may be more expensive than anticipated. If we fail to deploy generative AI as intended, our competitors may incorporate generative AI technology into their products or services more successfully than we do, which may impair our ability to effectively compete in the market. Furthermore, we make numerous statements online and in our marketing materials describing the availability of AI, as well as our use and integration of generative AI in our products. Although we endeavor to be accurate with our public statements and documentation, we may at times fail to do so or be alleged to have failed to do so. Our statements regarding our AI-supported features and use of generative AI can subject us to potential government or legal action if they are found to be deceptive, unfairunfair, misleading or misrepresentative of our actual practices. Should any of these statements prove to be untrue or be perceived as untrue, even thoughin circumstances beyond our reasonable control, such as when relying on statements provided by the AI and AI providers with whom we work, we may face litigation, disputes, claims, investigations, inquiries or other proceedings that could adversely affect our business, reputation, results of operations and financial condition.
Uncertainty in the legal regulatory regime relating to AI, as well as nuances and variation onin AI regulations from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, may require significant resources to modify and maintain business practices to comply with U.S. and foreign laws, the nature of which cannot be determined at this time as they continue to rapidly evolve and solidify. Several jurisdictions around the globeglobe, including Europe and certain U.S. states, have alreadyproposed, proposedenacted or enactedare lawsconsidering laws, regulations or guidelines governing AI.the Fordevelopment example,and use of AI, such as the EUEuropean Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (“EU AI Act”), hasColorado’s comeArtificial intoIntelligence forceAct and itsthe provisionsCalifornia areConsumer graduallyPrivacy becomingAct effective,regulations whichregarding automated decision-making. For example, the EU AI Act imposes a number of obligations on various parties related to the development and use of certain AI-based systems,systems. Under the EU AI Act, non-compliant companies may be subject to administrative fines of up to 35 million Euros or 7% of a company’s total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is the higher. Existing and otherfuture jurisdictions are beginning to adopt or prepare for adoption of similar laws. TheseAI-related laws may be more restrictive than the EU AI Act and may render theour use of such technologies challenging. While we aim to develop and use AI responsibly by attempting to identify and mitigate any issues associated with fairness, bias, transparency, or ethical or legal use of AI, the laws relating to AI are still evolving and guidance is lacking. As a result, we may be unsuccessful in identifying or resolving such issues. Further, use of our AI systems for unintended or improper use cases by customer users may alter the associated legal obligations upon Sprinklr, without our knowledge. We may not be able to detect, mitigate and remediate such misuse, and limitations of liability in contracts may be inadequate to address legal liability, fines, penalties and other regulatory actions resulting from such misuse. Additionally, certain privacy laws extend rights to consumers (such as the right to delete certain personal data) and regulate automated decision making, which may be incompatible with our use of AI, particularly training AI using personal data. These obligations may make it harder for us to conduct our business using AI, develop innovative AI models and create potential for regulatory fines or penalties, require us to change our business practices, retrain our AI, prevent or limit our creation and use of AI and/or generative AI, or delete or require us to disgorge certain algorithms. For example, the USU.S. Federal Trade Commission has required other companies to turn over or delete or disgorge valuable insights or trainings generated through the use of AI, or the AI models or algorithms themselves, where they allege the company has violated privacy and consumer protection laws.
Our use of AI and/or generative AI technology could result in additional compliance costs, regulatory investigations and actions, and lawsuits if we do not use (or are perceived to not use it) it in accordance with our internal and external policies and governance, or applicable laws and other obligations, including contractual obligations to our customers. However, if we cannot use AI and/or generative AI, or that use is restricted, our business may be less efficient, or we may be at a competitive disadvantage. Further, intellectual property ownership and liability for violation of terms of use, open-source license obligations, infringement or misappropriation of intellectual property and violation of privacy or publicity rights are issues arising from the use of AI technologies that legislators are still attempting to establish and with which courts are still grappling. In addition, access to data from third-party sources, including public sources and data suppliers, may become more restricted in the future, which could negatively impact our development and deployment of products,products as well as customer expectations, including AI technologies, that rely on such data for training or operation. Therefore, the use of AI technologies in connection with our products or operations may impact our business model or result in the inability to establish ownership of intellectual property or exposure to claims relating to the foregoing.
We depend on, and anticipate that we will continue to depend on, various third-party relationships in order to sustain and grow our business, including technology companies whose products integrate with ours. Failure of any of these technology companies to maintain, support or secure their technology platforms in general, and our integrations in particular, or errors or defects in their technologies or products, or errors in our implementation or maintenance of those technologies in our Unified-CXM platform could adversely affect our relationships with our customers, damage our brand and reputation and result in delays or difficulties in our ability to provide our Unified-CXM platform. For example, we rely on third parties to support certain components of our communication and voice services. Failure of any of these third-party providers to provide their services or to meet contractual service level commitments, or if they materially increase the cost of their services, for any reason, could adversely affect our relationships with our customers, lead to increases in the prices we are charged and therefore potentially the prices our customers pay for our products and services, damage our brand and reputation and result in delays or difficulties in our ability to provide certain services. We also rely on the availability and accuracy of various forms of client feedback and input data, including data solicited via survey or based on data sources across modern channels, and any changes in the availability or accuracy of such data could adversely impact our business and results of operations and harm our reputation and brand. In some cases, we rely on negotiated agreements with social media networks and other data providers. These negotiated agreements may provide increased access to application programming interfaces (“APIs”) and data that allow us to provide a more comprehensive solution for our customers. These agreements are subject to termination in certain circumstances, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to renew those agreements or that the terms of any such renewal, including pricing and levels of service, will be favorable. We cannot accurately predict the potential impact of the termination of any of our agreements with social media networks and other data providers, including the impact on our access to the related APIs. There can be no assurance that following any such termination we would be able to maintain the current level of functionality of our platform in such circumstances, as a result of more limited access to APIs or otherwise, which could adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, there can be no assurance that we will not be required to enter into new negotiated agreements with data providers in the future to maintain or enhance the level of functionality of our platform, or that the terms and conditions of such agreements, including pricing and levels of service, will not be less favorable, which could adversely affect our results of operations. In particular, X (formerly known as Twitter) provides us with certain data that supports our Unified-CXM platform pursuant to an agreement that expires on December 31, 2026. If our agreement with X expires, is not renewed on the same or similar terms or at all, or if it is terminated due to the failure or unwillingness of either party to perform its obligations thereunder, we may not be able to provide the same level of Unified-CXM insights to our customers and our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected. In addition, we obtain data from data aggregators who, despite their commercial commitments to us, may not have the right to provide that data to us, and so could expose us to claims in the future, from the data sources or data owners.
In some cases, we rely on negotiated agreements with social media networks and other data providers. These negotiated agreements may provide increased access to APIs and data that allow us to provide a more comprehensive solution for our customers. These agreements are subject to termination in certain circumstances, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to renew those agreements or that the terms of any such renewal, including pricing and levels of service, will be favorable, which may lead us to choose not to renew such agreements. We cannot accurately predict the potential impact of the termination of any of our agreements with social media networks and other data providers, including the impact on our access to the related APIs. There can be no assurance that following any such termination we would be able to maintain the current level of functionality of our platform in such circumstances, as a result of more limited access to APIs or otherwise, which could adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, there can be no assurance that we will not be required to enter into new negotiated agreements with data providers in the future to maintain or enhance the level of functionality of our platform, or that the terms and conditions of such agreements, including pricing and levels of service, will not be less favorable, which could adversely affect our results of operations. In particular, X (formerly known as Twitter) provides us with certain data that supports our Unified-CXM platform pursuant to an agreement that expires on December 31, 2026. If our agreement with X expires, is not renewed on the same or similar terms or at all, or if it is terminated due to the failure or unwillingness of either party to perform its obligations thereunder, we may not be able to provide the same level of Unified-CXM insights to our customers and our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected. In addition, we obtain data from data aggregators who, despite their commercial commitments to us, may not have the right to provide that data to us, and so could expose us to claims in the future, from the data sources or data owners.
•compliance with non-U.S. data privacy, protectionprotection, AI, and security laws, rules and regulations, including data localization requirements, and the risks and costs of non-compliance;
•political and economic conditions and uncertainty in each country or region in which we operate and general economic and political conditions and uncertainty around the worldworld, including as a result of cross-border military conflicts such as the 2026 Iran conflict;
We use open source software in connection with our Unified-CXM platform and products and operations, including those products that are currently (or may be) distributed. Some open source software licenses require users who distribute open source software as part of their software to publicly disclose all or part of the source code to such software or make available any derivative works of the open source code (which may include our modifications or product code into which such open source software has been integrated) on unfavorable terms allowing further modification and redistribution and at no or nominal cost, and we may be subject to such terms. The terms of many open source licenses have not been interpreted by U.S. or foreign courts, and there is a risk that these open source licenses could be construed in a way that imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to commercialize our products.
The terms of many open source licenses have not been interpreted by U.S. or foreign courts, and there is a risk that these open source licenses could be construed in a way that imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to commercialize our products. It is possible that our use of open source software could inadvertently result in, or could be claimed to have resulted inin, use that would require us to disclose source code that we have decided to maintain as proprietary or that would otherwise breach the terms or fail to meet the conditions of an open source license or third-party contract, in part because open source license terms are often ambiguous and are not always drafted with certain programming languages in mind. We could be subject to suits by parties claiming ownership of or demanding release of the open source software or derivative works that we developed using such software, which could include our proprietary source code, or otherwise seeking to enforce the applicable open source licensing terms or alleging that our use of such software infringes, misappropriates or otherwise violates a third party’s intellectual property rights. We may as a result be subject to claims for breach of contract, infringement of intellectual property rights, or indemnity, required to release our proprietary source code, pay damages, incur additional internal compliance costs, royalties, or license fees or other amounts, seek licenses, re-engineer our applications, discontinue sales in the event re-engineering cannot be accomplished on a timely basis or take other remedial action that may divert resources away from our development efforts, any of which could adversely affect our business. Any actual or claimed requirement to disclose our proprietary source code or pay damages for breach of the applicable license could harm our business and could help third parties, including our competitors, develop products and services that are similar to or better than ours.
We attempt to protect our intellectual property, technology, and confidential information in part through confidentiality, non-disclosure and invention assignment agreements with our employees, consultants, contractors, corporate collaborators, advisors and other third parties who develop intellectual property on our behalf or with whom we share information. However, we cannot guarantee that we have entered into such agreements with each party who has developed intellectual property on our behalf and each party that has or may have had access to our confidential information, know-how and trade secrets. These agreements may be insufficient or breached, or may not effectively prevent unauthorized access to or unauthorized use, disclosure, misappropriation or reverse engineering of,of our confidential information, intellectual property, or technology. There can be no assurance that these agreements will be self-executing or otherwise provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets or other intellectual property or proprietary information. Moreover, these agreements may not provide an adequate remedy for breaches or the unauthorized use or disclosure of our confidential information or technology or infringement of our intellectual property. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret or know-how is difficult, expensive, and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, trade secrets and know-how can be difficult to protect, and some courts inside and outside the United States are less willing or unwilling to protect trade secrets and know-how. If any of our trade secrets were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor or other third party, we would have no right to prevent them from using that technology or information to compete with us, and our competitive position would be materially and adversely harmed. The loss of trade secret protection could make it easier for third parties to compete with our products and services by copying functionality. Additionally, individuals not subject to invention assignment agreements may make adverse ownership claims to our current and future intellectual property, and, to the extent that our employees, independent contractors or other third parties with whom we do business use intellectual property owned by others in their work for us, disputes may arise as to the rights in related or resulting know-how and inventions. There is also a risk that we do not establish an unbroken chain of title from inventors to us. An inventorship or ownership dispute could arise that may permit one or more third parties to practice or enforce our intellectual property rights, including possible efforts to enforce rights against us. Additionally, errors in inventorship or ownership can sometimes also impact priority claims, and if we were to lose our ability to claim priority for certain patent filings, intervening art or other events may preclude us from issuing patents.
There is considerable patent and other intellectual property development activity in our industry and companies in the technology industry frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement, misappropriation or other violations of intellectual property rights. Our future success depends in part on our ability to develop and commercialize our products and services without infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating the intellectual property and proprietary rights of others. From time to time, we have received and may in the future receive claims from third parties, including our competitors, alleging that our Unified-CXM platform and underlying technology infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate such third party’s intellectual property rights, including their trade secrets, and we may be found to be infringing upon such rights. For example, on February 25, 2022, we agreed to settle all outstanding claims with Opal Labs Inc. (“Opal”) with respect to Opal’s complaints alleging breach of contract and violation of Oregon’s Uniform Trade Secrets Act, among other claims, and, on March 1, 2022, the court dismissed those claims with prejudice. We and Opal finalized the settlement on March 15, 2022, and it was paid on March 30, 2022.
Any litigation also may involve patent holding companies or other adverse patent owners that have no relevant solution revenue, and, therefore, our patent portfolio may provide little or no deterrence, as we would not be able to assert our patents against such entities or individuals. Such “non-practicing entities” and other intellectual property rights holders may attempt to assert intellectual property claims against us or seek to monetize the intellectual property rights they own to extract value through licensing or other settlements. We have in the past and may in the future be requested to and/or obligated to indemnify our customers or business partners in connection with any such litigation and to obtain licenses or refund subscription fees, which could further exhaust our resources. Even if we were to prevail in the event of claims or litigation against us, any claim or litigation regarding our technology or intellectual property, with or without merit, could be unpredictable, costly and time-consuming, and divert significant resources and the attention of our management and other employees from our business operations. Such disputes also could disrupt our Unified-CXM platform and products, which would adversely impact our client satisfaction and ability to attract customers. In the case of infringement, misappropriation or other violation caused by technology that we obtain from third parties, any indemnification or other contractual protections we obtain from such third parties, if any, may be insufficient to cover the liabilities we incur as a result of such infringement or misappropriation.
We have in the past and may in the future be requested to and/or obligated to indemnify our customers or business partners in connection with any such litigation and to obtain licenses or refund subscription fees, which could further exhaust our resources. Even if we were to prevail in the event of claims or litigation against us, any claim or litigation regarding our technology or intellectual property, with or without merit, could be unpredictable, costly and time-consuming, and divert significant resources and the attention of our management and other employees from our business operations. Such disputes also could disrupt our Unified-CXM platform and products, which would adversely impact our client satisfaction and ability to attract customers. In the case of infringement, misappropriation or other violation caused by technology that we obtain from third parties, any indemnification or other contractual protections we obtain from such third parties, if any, may be insufficient to cover the liabilities we incur as a result of such infringement or misappropriation.
We are, and may become in the future, subject to securities class actions, derivative suits or other securities-related legal actions. For example, in August 2024, a putative securities class action was filed against us and certain of our officers alleging violations of the federal securities laws for allegedly making false and misleading statements. On March 18, 2025, aMarch 26, 2025, and April 30, 2025, three stockholder derivative actionactions waswere filed, purporting to bring claims on behalf of the Company against certain of our current and former directors and officers for alleged violations of the federal securities laws and breaches of their fiduciary duties, among other claims, in relation to substantially the same factual allegations as those made in the securities class action.
In the past, securities class action litigation havehas often been brought against a company following a decline in the market price of its securities. In addition, stockholder activism, which could take many forms and arise in a variety of situations, has been increasing recently, and new universal proxy rules could significantly lower the cost and further increase the ease and likelihood of stockholder activism. This risk is especially relevant for us because technology companies have experienced significant stock price volatility in recent years. Volatility in our stock price or other reasons may in the future cause us to become the target of securities litigation or stockholder activism. Securities litigation and stockholder activism, including potential proxy contests, could result in substantial costs, including significant legal fees and other expenses, and divert our management and board of directors’ attention and resources from our business. Additionally, securities litigation and stockholder activism could give rise to perceived uncertainties as to our future, adversely affect our relationships with customers and business partners, adversely affect our reputation, and make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel. Our stock price could also be subject to significant fluctuation or otherwise be adversely affected by the events, risks and uncertainties of any securities litigation and stockholder activism.
Our business activities are subject to various restrictions under U.S. export and similar laws and regulations, including the United States Department of Commerce’s Export Administration Regulations and various economic and trade sanctions regulations administered by the United States Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Controls.Control. The U.S. export control laws and economic sanctions laws include restrictions or prohibitions on the sale or supply of certain products and services to certain embargoed or sanctioned countries, governments, persons and entities. In addition, we may incorporate encryption technology into certain of our offerings, and encryption offerings and the underlying technology may be exported outside of the United States only with the required export authorizations, including by license, and we cannot guarantee that any required authorization will be obtained. If we are found to be in violation of U.S. economic sanctions or export control laws, it could result in substantial fines and penalties for us and for the individuals working for us. We also may experience other adverse effects, including reputational harm and loss of access to certain markets.
In addition, federal and state government agencies and private organizations have imposed, and may in the future impose, additional taxes, fees or other charges for accessing the Internet or commerce conducted via the Internet. Internet access is frequently provided by companies that have significant market power and could take actions that degrade, disrupt or increase the cost of our customers’ use of our Unified-CXM platform, which could negatively impact our business. In December 2017, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) repealed its 2015 “network neutrality” rules, effective June 2018. The 2015 network neutrality rules were designed to ensure that all online content and services were treated the same by internet service providers and granted providers of broadband internet access services greater freedom to make changes to their services, including, potentially, changes that may discriminate against or harm our business. In April 2024, the FCC adopted an order that substantially reinstated the 2015 rules, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit overturned the FCC’s decision on January 2, 2025, which means that there is no federal regulation requiring network neutrality. A number of states have adopted or are adopting or considering legislation or executive actions that would regulate the conduct of broadband providers. For example, California and Vermont have state-level requirements in effect, and New York is considering similar legislation. We cannot predict the actions that the FCC may take, whether any new FCC order or state initiatives regulating providers will be modified, overturned, or vacated by legal action, federal legislation, or the FCC itself, or the degree to which additional federal or state regulatory action –- or inaction –- may adversely affect our business. We could incur greater operating expenses or our customers’ use of our Unified-CXM platform could be adversely affected, either of which could harm our business and results of operations.
We seek to maintain the integrity and availability of our products and confidentiality of our confidential information through certain controls, such as business continuity and disaster recovery plans, redundant designs of operational systems and processes, internal corporate governance, training and availability of key employees, contractual and technical assurances by our third-party service providers to maintain their services to us, regular tests and audits of critical systems and plans, capacity planning for current and future system and process needs, enterprise risk management, and periodic review of our plans. Notwithstanding these efforts, we cannot ensure that our systems or those of the third parties with whom we work are not or will not be vulnerable to disruptions from natural or man-made disasters or other security incidents. We are exposed to threats and resulting risks that may result in a significant disruption of our ability to deliver our products to our customers.
In the ordinary course of business, we collect, receive, store, process, generate, use, transfer, disclose, make accessible, protect, secure, dispose of, transmit, share and conduct other activities with (which we collectively refer to as “process”) proprietary and confidential data, including personal data, intellectual property, and trade secrets, of ours or our customers (collectively, “confidential information”). Additionally, our customers can utilize our Unified-CXM platform to process confidential information or personal data relating to their employees, customers, partners and other individuals. Our data processing activities subject us to numerous global data privacy and security obligations, such as various laws, regulations, guidance, industry standards, external and internal privacy and security policies, contracts, and other obligations that govern the processing of confidential information by us and on our behalf.
Additionally, our customers can utilize our Unified-CXM platform to process confidential information or personal data relating to their employees, customers, partners, and other individuals. Our data processing activities subject us to numerous global data privacy and security obligations, such as various laws, regulations, guidance, industry standards, frameworks, external and internal privacy and security policies, contracts, and other obligations that govern the processing of confidential information by us and on our behalf.
In the United States, federal, state, and local governments have enacted numerous data privacy and security laws, including data breach notification laws, personal data privacy laws, and consumer protection laws (such as Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act), and other laws, including wiretapping laws. For example, some privacy laws and other obligations require us or our customers to obtain consent to process personal data in certain circumstances. Some of our data processing practices may be challengedsubject to challenges or lawsuits under data privacy and communication laws, including, for example, under wiretapping laws, asif we obtainshare customer information fromwith third parties through various methods, including chatbot and session replay providers, or via third-party marketing pixels. In addition, we must comply with the FCC’s regulations that require us to protect private customer information about their use of telecommunications services, known as customer proprietary network information. Our, or the third parties with whom we work, inability or failure to adhere to applicable requirements could result in adverse consequences, including class action litigation, mass arbitration demands and statutory fines for noncompliance. In the past few years, numerous U.S. states have enacted comprehensive privacy laws that impose certain obligations on covered businesses, including providing specific disclosures in privacy notices and affording residents with certain rights concerning their personal data. As applicable, such rights may include the right to access, correct, or delete certain personal data, and to opt-out of certain data processing activities, such as targeted advertising, profiling, and automated decision-making, which, even if not directly applicable to Sprinklr as a data processor, may be applicable to our customers. The exercise of these rights may impact our business and ability to provide our products and services. These state laws also allow for statutory fines for noncompliance. For example, under the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CCPA”), noncompliance carries fines and also allows for a private right of action for certain data breaches. These laws, as well as other laws or regulations relating to data privacy and security, particularly any new or modified laws or regulations that require enhanced protection of certain types of data or new obligations with regard to data retention, transfer or disclosure, may result in further uncertainty with respect to data privacy and security issues,issues and will require us to dedicate additional resources and incur additional resource, costs and expenses in an effort to comply. The enactment of various laws has prompted similar legislative developments in other states, which has created a patchwork of overlapping nuanced state laws, as certain state laws may be more stringent, broader in scope or offer greater individual rights with respect to personal data than federal, foreign or other state laws, which complicate compliance efforts. The federal government is also still considering comprehensive privacy legislation.
In addition, as we continue to expand our business activities, we are accessing additional types and greater volumes of potentially confidential or sensitive information that may subject us to additional privacy and security laws and obligations. For example, in certain limited instances, we have agreed with specific customers to permit the exchange of protected health information through certain approved platform components. Our access to protected health information for specific agreed upon use cases on behalf of those customers that are covered entities and therefore subject to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (collectively, “HIPAA”), may subject us to HIPAA’s specific requirements relating to the privacy, security, and transmission of protected health information. To the extent that we are or may become subject to HIPAA, our failure to comply could result in significant penalties. Additionally, to the extent that additional customers with whom we did not agree to permit the exchange of protected health information through our platforms in their capacity as covered entities nonetheless input or allow such information within the platform in violation of their contractual obligations with us, we could also be subject to additional compliance risks. SimilarOther privacy, security,privacy and transmissionsecurity obligations may apply to us outside the United States if we process health information and other categories of sensitive or confidential information knowingly or unknowingly, and our failure to comply could result in significant penalties. As we expand into more regulated industries, there may be additional obligations regarding the types of data in scope, and higher risk due to the sensitivity and potential impact of exposure.
As another example, we enable the processing of credit card data through our Secure Forms module, and we have entered contractual relationships requiring us to comply with the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (“PCI DSS”). The PCI DSS requires companies to adopt certain measures to ensure the security of cardholder information, including using and maintaining firewalls, adopting proper password protections for certain devices and software, and restricting data access. Noncompliance with PCI-DSSPCI DSS can result in penalties ranging from $5,000 to $100,000 per month by credit card companies, litigation, damage to our reputation, and revenue losses.
These laws continue to scale, reform and evolve. Europe and other jurisdictions have proposed or enacted laws requiring data to be localized in some limited circumstances or limiting the transfer of personal data to other countries. In addition, some customers have internal policy requirements whichor impose contractual obligations that may differ from, or be more burdensome than, applicable regulations. For example, European and other data protection laws, including the GDPR, place some restrictions on the ability of companies to freely transfer personal data to countries deemed to be inadequate for privacy purposes, and there are fairly rigorous restrictions regarding transfers of personal data from China. Other jurisdictions may also adopt stringent data localization and cross-border data transfer requirements and, in many circumstances, these may be requirements outside of the scope of privacy law, including industry-specific or national security requirements. With respect to data transfers under the GDPR, although there are currently various mechanisms that may be used to enable the transfer of personal data from the European Economic Area (“EEA”) and UKUnited Kingdom to the United States in compliance with the law, such as the EU-US Data Privacy Framework and the UK extension thereto (to which we are an active participant) and the EU’sEuropean Union’s standard contractual clauses, these mechanisms continue to be subject to legal challenges, and there is no continued assurance that we can satisfy or rely on these measures to lawfully transfer personal data to the United States or other countries with “inadequate” data protection regimes without the potential for future challenge. If there is no lawful manner for us to transfer personal data from the EEA, the UK,United Kingdom, or other jurisdictions outside of the origin territory, or if the requirements for a legally-compliant transfer are too onerous, we could face significant adverse consequences, including the prohibition on further transfers (including remote access by employees in support teams in certain regions), the interruption or degradation of our operations, the need to relocate part of or all of our business or data processing activities to other jurisdictions at significant expense, increased exposure to regulatory actions, substantial fines and penalties, the inability to transfer data and work with partners, vendors and other third parties, and injunctions against our processing or transferring of personal data necessary to operate our business. Additionally, companies that transfer personal data out of the EEA and UK to other jurisdictions, particularly to the United States, can be subject to increased scrutiny from regulators, individual litigants, and activist groups. Regulators in the United States, such as the U.S. Department of Justice,Justice alsoissued area increasinglyrule scrutinizing certain personal data transfers and have proposed and enacted certain data localization requirements, such as, for example,entitled the Biden Administration’s executive order Preventing Access to Americans’ BulkU.S. Sensitive Personal Data and United States Government-Related Data by Countries of Concern.Concern or Covered Persons, which places additional restriction on certain data transactions involving countries of concern (e.g., China, Russia, Iran) and covered persons (i.e., individuals and entities who are designated as such by the U.S. Attorney General or considered “foreign persons” and are majority owned by, organized under the laws of, a primary resident in, or a contractor of, a covered person or country of concern, as applicable) that may impact certain business activities such as vendor engagements, sale or sharing of data, employment of certain individuals, and investor agreements. Violations of the rule could lead to significant civil and criminal fines and penalties.
We also may become subject to new laws that regulate non-personal data. For example, the European Union’s Data Act imposes certain data and cloud service interoperability and switching obligations to enable users to switch between cloud service providers without undue delay or cost, as well as certain requirements concerning cross-border international transfers of, and governmental access to, non-personal data outside the EEA. Depending on how this Act and any similar laws are implemented and interpreted, we may have to adapt our business practices, contractual arrangements, and services to comply with such obligations. In addition, some of our customers may be subject to the European Union’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) and similar UK regulatory requirements on operational resilience. These laws may obligate our customers to impose contractual provisions on us, including certain mandatory third-party risk management provisions. If we fail to comply with relevant contractual requirements, we may be subject to investigations, audits or other adverse consequences. Moreover, in Europe, the European Union’s Network and Information Security Directive (“NIS2”) regulates resilience and incident response capabilities of entities operating in a number of sectors. Non-compliance with NIS2 may lead to administrative fines of a maximum of 10 million Euros or up to 2% of the total worldwide revenue of the preceding fiscal year. While NIS2 has not been transposed in all Member States of the European Union, we may become directly or indirectly subject to NIS2. Depending on how these new laws are implemented and interpreted, we may have to adapt our business practices, contractual arrangements and products to comply with such obligations.
We are or may become directly or indirectly subject to new laws in the EEA that regulate cybersecurity and non-personal data, such as the EU Data Act, the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) or the so-called “EU NIS2 Directive.” Depending on how new laws are implemented and interpreted, we may have to adapt our business practices, contractual arrangements and products to comply with such obligations.
UK and EEA data privacy regulations in relation to electronic communications also require opt-in consent to send certain unsolicited marketing emails or other electronic communications to individuals or for the use of cookies and the data obtained using cookies and similar technologies for advertising, analytics and certain other purposes –- activities on which our products and marketing strategies rely. Enforcement of these requirements has increased, and a new regulation proposed in the EU, known as the ePrivacy Regulation, makes these requirements, as well as requirements around tracking technologies, such as cookies, more stringent and increases the penalties for violating them. Such restrictions could increase our exposure to regulatory enforcement action, increase our compliance costs, and adversely affect our business.
We sometimes rely on certain data obtained from third-party data suppliers, and the sale of data to third parties has become subject to increased regulatory scrutiny. Therefore, obtaining information from third parties carries risk to us as a data purchaser and onward provider to our customers. Regulators are increasingly scrutinizing the activities of third-party data suppliers, as well as those using the data from those third parties, and laws in the United States (including the CCPA and California Delete Act) and other jurisdictions, such as Europe (including GDPR,GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive), are likewise regulating such activity. These laws pose additional, material compliance risks to such suppliers, and these suppliers may not be able to supply us with personal data in compliance with these laws. Such laws may make it difficult for our suppliers to provide the data as the costs associated with the data materially increase. For example, some data suppliers are required to register as data brokers under California, Vermont, Texas and Oregon law and file reports with regulators, which exposes them to increased scrutiny. Additionally, the California Delete Act requires the California Privacy Protection Agency to establish by January 1, 2026 a mechanism to allow California consumers to submit a single, verifiable request to delete all of their personal data held by all registered data brokers and their service providers.providers to honor consumer opt-out requests. Moreover, third-party data suppliers have recently been subject to increased litigation under various claims of violating certain state privacy laws. These laws and challenges may make it so difficult for our suppliers to provide data to us that the costs associated with the data materially increase or may materially decrease the availability of data that our data suppliers can provide to us. In addition, we may face compliance risks and limitations on our ability to use certain data provided by our third-party suppliers if those suppliers have not complied with applicable privacy laws, for example, where necessary by providing appropriate transparency notices to data subjects,subjects and obtaining necessary consents or where the data is not lawfully made available to us. In addition, there may be restrictions in their terms of use of which we are not aware.aware or that inhibit development of new products and features or certain customer use cases, thereby stalling innovation or impairing our ability to compete in the market competitively.
In addition to data privacy and security laws, our contractual obligations relating to data privacy and security have become increasingly stringent due to changes in data privacy and security market practices and the expansion of our service offerings. For example, certain data privacy and security laws, such as the GDPR and the CCPA, require us to impose specific contractual restrictions on our service providers, and our customers are requiring broader and more extensive commitments. Failure to comply with such contractual obligations could increase our exposure to adverse customer actions, regulatory enforcement action, increase our compliance costs, and adversely affect our business.
Business partners and other third parties with a strong influence on how consumers interact with our products, such as Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft and Mozilla, have and may continue to create new privacy controls or restrictions on their data, products and platforms, limiting the effectiveness of our services. With obligations relating to AI, data privacy and security changing and imposingbecoming newincreasingly and stringent obligations,stringent, and with some uncertainty over the interpretation and application of these and other obligations, we may face challenges in addressing their requirements and making necessary changes to our policies and practices and may incur significant costs and expenses in an effort to do so.
Even with processes designed to assess the third parties with whom we work, we may not have sufficient knowledge about the locations where such third parties process personal data, the types of data transfers in scope for their processing, how that data is processed, or what data is processed,processed or secured, which may impact the commitments we can make to our customers. Additionally, if the third parties with whom we work with,work, including our vendors or third-party service providers, violate applicable laws, rules or regulationsregulations, or the terms of our commercial agreements with those third parties or our policies, such violations may put our or our customers’ data at risk and could in turn have an adverse effect on our business. Any failure or perceived failure by us or the third parties with whom we work to comply with our data privacy or security obligations to customers or other third parties, or any of our other legal obligations relating to data privacy or security, may result in governmental investigations or inquiries (which have occurred in the past and may occur in the future), enforcement actions, litigation and mass arbitration demands, disputes or other claims, indemnification requests, restrictions on providing our services, claims or public statements against us by privacy advocacy groups or others, adverse press and widespread negative publicity, reputational damage, significant liability or fines and the loss of the trust of our customers, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The cost of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, laws, rules, regulations and other obligations relating to data privacy and security applicable to the businesses of our customers may adversely affect our customers’ ability and willingness to process personal data from their employees, customers and partners, which could limit the use, effectiveness and adoption of our Unified-CXM platform and reduce overall demand. Furthermore, the uncertain and shifting regulatory environment, as well as changes in consumer expectations concerning data privacyprivacy, may cause concerns regarding data privacy and may cause our data vendors, customers or our customers’ customers to resist providing the data necessary to allow our customers to use our services effectively. Even the perception of privacy concerns, whether or not valid, may inhibit market adoption, effectiveness or use of our applications.
In the ordinary course of our business, we process confidential information. Use of our Unified-CXM platform also involves processing our customers’ information, including personal data regarding their customers, employees or other individuals.
In addition, our Unified-CXM platform or other internal systems used for operating our business may be misconfigured or contain significant unmitigated weaknesses or vulnerabilities, resulting in a heightened exposure to internal and external threats. The processes used to implement technical and administrative controls to protect our systems and the data they contain may be ineffective, either in partspart or entirely. Our employees, contractors, partners, vendors and customers could create situations whereby critical controls are bypassed, deactivated or otherwise reduced in effectiveness, which could lead to the inadvertent exposure of confidential information, intellectual property or other sensitive information and heighten our exposure to security threats. Moreover, we may not have access to any effective control mechanisms that could mitigate these concerns or address new or advanced concerns. In the event that such weaknesses or vulnerabilities were exploited by internal or external threats, we could face adverse consequences, such as significant interruptions in our operations, loss of customers, loss of data and income, reputational harm, and diversion of funds.
We and the third parties with whom we work are subject to a variety of evolving threats, including, but not limited to, social-engineering attacks (including through deep fakes, which may be increasingly more difficult to identify as fake, and phishing attacks), malicious code (such as viruses, worms, backdoors and time bombs), malware (including as a result of advanced persistent threat intrusions), volumetric or application-level denial-of-service attacks, credential stuffing attacks, credential harvesting, personnel misconduct or error, ransomware attacks, supply-chain attacks, software bugs, server malfunctions, misconfiguration, software or hardware failures, access deprovisioning failures, loss of data or other information technology assets, attacks enhanced or facilitated by AI and other similar threats. In particular, ransomware attacks, including by organized criminal threat actors, nation-states, and nation-state-supported actors, are prevalent and severe and can lead to significant interruptions in our operations, loss of data and income, reputational harm, and diversion of funds. Extortion payments may alleviate the negative impact of a ransomware attack, but we may be unwilling or unable to make such payments due to, for example, applicable laws or regulations prohibiting such payments. Adware, telecommunications failures, earthquakes, fires, floods, adverse weather events, and man-made disasters may also impact the availability of our systems and operations. Additionally, our customers have in the past conducted, and may continue to conduct in the future, their own penetration testing on our systems, potentially uncovering issues or vulnerabilities. The discovery of vulnerabilities in our systemssystems, including by customerscustomers, could result in adverse consequences, including contractual penalties, customer churn and reputational damage.
Our remote workforce poses increased risks to our information technology systems and data,data as more of our employees utilize network connections, computers, and devices outside our premises or network, including while working from home, while in transit, and in public locations. Future or past business transactions (such as acquisitions or integrations) could expose us to additional cybersecurity risks and vulnerabilities, as our systems could be negatively affected by vulnerabilities present in acquired or integrated entities’ systems and technologies. We may also discover security issues that were not identified during due diligence of such acquired or integrated entities, and it may be difficult to integrate other companies into our information technology environment and security program.
We rely upon third parties and third-party technologies to operate critical business systems and to process confidential information in a variety of contexts, including, without limitation, third-party providers of cloud-based infrastructure, encryption and authentication technology, employee email, content delivery to customers, and other functions. While we require the third parties with whom we work to process confidential information on our behalf to meet certain security requirements and give contractual commitments to us regarding their data processing activities, our ability to monitor these third parties’ information security practices is limited, and despite such assurance and commitments, these third parties may not have, or may not continue to have, adequate information security measures in place. If the third parties with whom we work experience a security incident or other interruption, we could experience adverse consequences. While we may be entitled to damages if these third parties fail to satisfy their privacy or security-related obligations to us, any award may be insufficient to cover our damages or protect our reputation, or we may be unable to recover any such awarded damages. Moreover, supply-chain attacks have increased in frequency and severity, and we cannot guarantee that third parties and infrastructure in our supply chain or in the third parties’ with whom we work supply chains have not been compromised or that they do not contain exploitable vulnerabilities, defects or bugs that could result in a breach of or disruption to our information technology systems (including our products and services) or the third-party information technology systems that support us and our services.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Restructuring Expense”
New heading “Restructuring Expense”
Removed heading “Historical Common Stock Valuations”
Largest changes
Unfavorable conditions in the economy both in the United States and abroad may negatively affect the growth of our business and our results of operations. For example, macroeconomic and geopolitical events, including fluctuations in inflation and interestsee in full comparisonratesrates, the imposition of tariffs in the United States and abroad, the Russia-Ukraine war and military conflicts in the Middle East and theRussia-Ukraine2025andU.S.Israel-Hamasgovernmentwars,shutdown, have led to economic uncertainty both in the United States and globally. Historically, during periods of economic and geopolitical uncertainty and downturns, businesses may slow spending on information technology, which may impact our business and our customers’ businesses.While we have experienced growing inflationary pressures on the cost of wages, rent and data, the net result of inflationary impacts and our efforts to mitigate these impacts have not been material to us during the periods included in this report. In addition, general economic weakness may lead to longer collection cycles for payments due from our customers and an increase in customer provision for credit losses, as well as restructuring initiatives and associated expenses, and customers and potential customers may require extended financial concessions, which could result in adjustments to revenue recognition.
“Further, geopolitical events, such as Russia-Ukraine war, the 2026 Iran conflict and other military or security related events globally, may adversely affect our business. For example, our operations in the Middle East have been adversely impacted by the 2026 Iran conflict, including disruptions to our business activities in the region and inaccessibility, and potential loss, of certain customer data in connection with a third-party data center infrastructure in the United Arab Emirates on which we relied. …”see in full comparison
“(2) Represents the Company’s current and deferred income tax expense commensurate with the non-GAAP measure of profitability using a non-GAAP tax rate of 26.4% for the year ended January 31, 2026. …”see in full comparison
“Restructuring expense includes costs associated with the global workforce reductions implemented in fiscal years 2026 and 2025. The majority of these costs consist of severance, benefits and the acceleration of equity awards. We do not expect to incur any further restructuring expense with respect to the workforce reductions implemented in fiscal years 2026 and 2025.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (81)
This section of our Form 10-K discusses our financial condition and results of operations for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2026, 2025, 2024, and 20232024 and year-to-year comparisons between fiscal 2025year 2026 and fiscal 2024.year 2025. Year-to-year comparisons between fiscal 2024year 2025 and fiscal 2023year 2024 that are not included in this Form 10-K can be found in “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2024,2025, filed on March 29,21, 2024.2025.
Certain prior quarterly and annual amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
Sprinklr provides a Unified Customer Experience Management (“Unified-CXM”) platform designed to help organizations manage customer interactions across multiple channels and teams. Our AI-native platform enables customer-facing teams, from Customer Service to Marketing, to collaborate across internal silos, communicate with customers across digital and traditional channels and leverage AI to deliver improved customer experiences at scale.
Sprinklr is redefining the world’s ability to make every customer experience extraordinary.
We do this with our evolving enterprise software – Unified Customer Experience Management (“Unified-CXM”) – that enables customer-facing teams, from Customer Service to Marketing, to collaborate across internal silos, communicate across digital channels, and leverage AI to deliver better customer experiences at scale – all on one unified, AI-based platform. Sprinklr has four main product suites: Sprinklr Social, Sprinklr Insights, Sprinklr Marketing and our newest offering, Sprinklr Service. We believe that these four suites enable the world’s largestlarge and leading brands to bettermore effectively reach, engage and listen to their customers on the channel of their choice. We continue to invest in the unified platform and develop new features and enhancements to each suite asin ourresponse customers’to needsevolving evolve.customer needs.
Our Unified-CXM platform utilizes an architecture purpose-built for managing Customer Experience Management (“CXM”) data and is powered by proprietary AI, collaborative workflow, seamless automation, broad-based listening and customer-led governancegovernance. This architecture is designed to help enterprises analyze massive amounts of unstructured and structured data.
We generate revenue primarily from the sale of subscriptions to our Unified-CXM platform and related professional services. Our platform includes products that are licensed on a per-user basis as well as products that are licensed based on different tiers of volume.
We believe that our Unified-CXM platform is highly effective for organizations of all sizes, and we have a highly diverse group of customers across a broad array of industries and geographies. We focus primarily on selling our platform to large global enterprises, as we believe that we have significant competitive advantages attracting and serving such organizations given their complex needs and the broad capabilities our platform offers.
Our customerscustomer includebase is diverse, spanning global enterprises across a broad array of industries and geographies, as well as marketing agencies andagencies, government departments along withdepartments, non-profit and educational institutions. Our customers are located in over 80 countries, and our AI-based CXM platform recognizes over 150 languages. As of January 31, 2025,2026, we had 1,9301,677 customers spanningin organizationsmore ofthan a90 broadcountries, rangewith ofour sizesplatform andsupporting industries,over including150 60%languages. ofThis the Fortune 100 companies, comparedcompares to 1,7351,930 customers as of January 31, 2024.2025. The decrease in total customers year-over-year was primarily due to a strategic refinement of our customer profile and an increased focus on top-tier enterprise customers. We define our large customers as customersthose with greaterat than or equal toleast $1.0 million in subscription revenue on a trailing 12-month basis, as of the period presented.basis. As of January 31, 2025,2026, we had 149141 large customerscustomers, compared to 126149 as of January 31, 2024.2025. While the number of large customers decreased, the average subscription revenue per customer in this cohort increased, reflecting our focus on higher-value relationships.
We primarily target large global enterprises, as we believe that our Unified-CXM platform’s breadth and depth of capabilities are well-suited to address the complex needs of these organizations. Our customers include 59% of the Fortune 100 companies.
Remaining Performance Obligation (“RPO”) represents contracted revenue that has not yet been recognized and includes deferred revenue and amounts that will be invoiced and recognized in future periods. Current RPO (“cRPO”) represents contracted revenue that has not yet been recognized and includes deferred revenue and amounts that will be invoiced and recognized in the next 12 months. As of January 31, 2026, our RPO was $986.5 million, and our cRPO was $618.8 million. As of January 31, 2025, our RPO was $987.7 millionmillion, and our cRPO was $612.5 million. As of January 31, 2024, our RPO was $966.6 million and our cRPO was $587.0 million.
We believe that net dollar expansion rate (“NDE”) is an indicator of the value that our platform delivers to customers. We calculate NDE to measure our ability to retain and expand subscription revenue from our existing customers. NDE compares our subscription revenue from the same set of customers across comparable periods and reflects customer renewals, expansion, contraction and churn. We calculate NDE by dividing (i) subscription revenue in the trailing 12-month period from those customers who were on our platform during the most recent prior 12-month period by (ii) subscription revenue from the same customers in the preceding prior 12-month period. This calculation is net of upsells, contraction, cancellation or expansion during the period but excludes subscription revenue from new customers. Our NDE, on a trailing 12-month basis, was 103.6%103.0% and 117.7%103.6% for the 12-month periods ended January 31, 20252026 and 2024,2025, respectively. TheNDE decreasewas stable year-over-year despite continued churn and down-selling of certain existing customers, which was partially driven by elevated churn, exacerbated by the current macroeconomic environment.
Macroeconomic and Geopolitical Considerations
Unfavorable conditions in the economy both in the United States and abroad may negatively affect the growth of our business and our results of operations. For example, macroeconomic and geopolitical events, including fluctuations in inflation and interest ratesrates, the imposition of tariffs in the United States and abroad, the Russia-Ukraine war and military conflicts in the Middle East and the Russia-Ukraine2025 andU.S. Israel-Hamasgovernment wars,shutdown, have led to economic uncertainty both in the United States and globally. Historically, during periods of economic and geopolitical uncertainty and downturns, businesses may slow spending on information technology, which may impact our business and our customers’ businesses. While we have experienced growing inflationary pressures on the cost of wages, rent and data, the net result of inflationary impacts and our efforts to mitigate these impacts have not been material to us during the periods included in this report. In addition, general economic weakness may lead to longer collection cycles for payments due from our customers and an increase in customer provision for credit losses, as well as restructuring initiatives and associated expenses, and customers and potential customers may require extended financial concessions, which could result in adjustments to revenue recognition.
While we have experienced growing inflationary pressures on the cost of wages, rent and data, the net result of inflationary impacts and our efforts to mitigate these impacts have not been material to us during the periods included in this report. In addition, general economic weakness may lead to longer collection cycles for payments due from our customers and an increase in customer provision for credit losses, as well as restructuring initiatives and associated expenses, and customers and potential customers may require extended financial concessions, which could result in adjustments to revenue recognition.
Further, geopolitical events, such as Russia-Ukraine war, the 2026 Iran conflict and other military or security related events globally, may adversely affect our business. For example, our operations in the Middle East have been adversely impacted by the 2026 Iran conflict, including disruptions to our business activities in the region and inaccessibility, and potential loss, of certain customer data in connection with a third-party data center infrastructure in the United Arab Emirates on which we relied. Such events may result in a decrease in customer demand for our services, increased scrutiny from customers and regulators, and damage our reputation, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, we may incur significant and unanticipated expenses to mitigate the possibility of further harm, including through emergency data transfers, temporary changes to data processing locations, increased infrastructure costs, or as through the relocation of our employees or data to other regions not affected by the conflict.
The effect of macroeconomic and geopolitical conditions may not be fully reflected in our results of operations until future periods. If, however, economic uncertainty increases or the global economy worsens, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be harmed. For further discussion of the potential impacts of macroeconomic events on our business, financial condition, and operating results, see the“Part sectionI. titledItem “1A. Risk Factors” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K.
Subscription revenue consists primarily of fees from customersfor accessing our proprietary Unified-CXM platform, as well as related supportstand-ready services.services, Subscription revenueand is generally recognized ratably over the relatedcommitted contractsubscription termterm. beginningThe on the commencement datemajority of each contract, which is generally the date our servicesubscription is made available to customers. Our subscriptions typicallycontracts have a term of onetwo to three years. Historically, we have experienced seasonality in our sales cycle, as a large percentage of our customers make their purchases in the fourth quarter of a given fiscal year and pay us in the first quarter of the subsequent year. This seasonality may be reflected to a much lesser extent, and sometimes may not be immediately apparent, in our revenue, due to the fact that we recognize subscription revenue over the term of the applicable subscription agreement.
Professional services revenue consists primarily of feesfixed-fee associatedarrangements withto providingprovide implementation and managed services that assist our customers with the configuration and optimization offor our Unified-CXM software.Platform. These fees also includeFor managed services fees whereservices, our consultants work as part ofalongside our customers’ teams to help leveragethem the subscription services to execute onrealize their customerCXM experiencegoals, managementincluding goalsplatform configuration, ongoing education and enablementad-hoc services, which consist of initial design, configuration and education services.support.
Costs of subscription revenue consistsconsist primarily of costs to host our software platform,platform; data costs, including cost of third-party data utilized in our platform,platform; personnel-related expenses for our subscription and support operations personnel, including salaries, benefits, bonuses and stock-based compensation,compensation; professional fees,fees; software costs,costs; travel expenses, the amortization of our capitalized internal-use software; and allocated overhead expenses, including facilities costs for our subscription and support operations. We expect that costs of subscription revenue will increase in absolute dollars as we expand our customer base and make continued investments in our cloud infrastructure and support organization. Furthermore, we estimate that data and hosting costs with various partners may rise in the near term.
Costs of professional services revenue consistsconsist primarily of personnel-related expenses for our professional services personnel.personnel, including salaries, benefits, bonuses and stock-based compensation,compensation; professional fees,fees; software costs,costs; subcontractor costs,costs; travel expenses; and allocated overhead expenses, including facilities costs, for our professional services organization. We expect that our costs of professional services revenuemay willvary increasefrom in absolute dollars as we continueperiod to increaseperiod based on the project-based nature of this work, our increased use of partners inand additional headcount for the delivery of implementation services and expand our customer base.services.
Gross profit is defined as total revenue less total costs of revenue. Gross margin is gross profit expressed as a percentage of total revenue. We expect that gross profit and gross margin will continue to be affected by various factors, including our pricing, our mix of revenues and the costs required to deliver those revenues.
Our gross margin on subscription revenue is significantly higher than our gross margin on professional services revenue, and as a resultresult, our gross margin may vary from period to period if our mix of revenue or costs of revenue fluctuates. In addition, because personnel-related expenses represent the largest component inof costs of professional services revenue, we may experience changes in our professional services gross margin due to the timing of delivery of those services. We expect that our gross margin will decline in the near term due to higher data and hosting costscosts, coupled with higher service delivery costs, and, in the long term, will vary from period to period.
Our operating expenses consist of research and development, sales and marketing andmarketing, general and administrative and restructuring expenses.
Research and development expense consists primarily of costs relating to the maintenance, continued development and enhancement of our cloud-based software platform and includes personnel-related expense for our research and development organization, including salaries, benefits, bonuses and stock-based compensation, professional fees, travel expenses and allocated overhead expenses, including facilities costs. Research and development expenses are expensed as incurred, except for internal-use software development costs that qualify for capitalization. We expect research and development expense to generally increase in absolute dollars as we continue to innovate and invest in enhancing and expanding the capabilities of our Unified-CXM platform.
Sales and marketing expense consists primarily of personnel-related expenses for our sales and marketing organization, including salaries, benefits, bonuses and stock-based compensation, professional fees, software costs, advertising, marketing, promotional and brand awareness activities, travel expenses and allocated overhead expense, including facilities costs. Sales commissions earned by our sales force are considered incremental and recoverable costs of obtaining a contract with a customer and are deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected period of benefit. In the near term, we expect sales and marketing expense to decrease as we work to right size our costs. In the long term, weWe expect sales and marketing expense to generally increase in absolute dollars as we continue to drive the growth of our business. We continue to optimize our sales and marketing expense and seek efficiencies in our investments.
Restructuring Expense
Restructuring expense includes costs associated with the global workforce reductions implemented in fiscal years 2026 and 2025. The majority of these costs consist of severance, benefits and the acceleration of equity awards. We do not expect to incur any further restructuring expense with respect to the workforce reductions implemented in fiscal years 2026 and 2025.
We expect that our general and administrative expense will decrease in the near term as a result of cost saving initiatives and generally increase in absolute dollars in the long term as we continue to grow our business. We also anticipate that we will incur additional costs for employees and third-party consulting services, which may cause our general and administrative expense to fluctuate as a percentage of revenue from period to period.
Provision for income taxes consists primarily of income taxes related to foreign and U.S. jurisdictions in which we conduct business. Our annual estimated effective tax rate differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate in fiscal 2025year 2026 primarily due to the valuationimpact allowanceof releasenon-deductible items, stock-based compensation expense and the foreign tax rate differential on ournon-U.S. U.S. federalincome and statewithholding deferredtaxes, as well as changes in our uncertain tax assets.positions.
The increase in subscription revenue was primarily due to increased revenue from existing customers driven by the purchase of additional quantities of current subscription solutions and additional add-on solutions within our platform, as well as demand for our solutions from new customers. Such growth was partially offset by certain existing customers purchasing fewer quantities of current subscription solutions within our platformplatform, as well as certain customers no longer subscribing to our platform, partially driven by challenging macroeconomic conditions.
The increase in professional services revenue was primarily due to growth in both implementations and managed services related to Contact Center as a Service (“CCaaS”) delivery capabilities.
The increase in costs of subscription revenue was primarily due to (i)an higherincrease costsof related$33.3 tomillion in third-party data, cloud and network infrastructure necessarycosts, partially attributable to meet our increased customer demand,demand whichas includedwell aas $19.8higher millionrates increase infrom our datathird-party and hosting costs and (ii) a $3.2 million increase in the amortization of capitalized research and development costs.providers.
The increase in costs of professional services revenue was primarily due to (i) an $11.7$11.0 million increase in subcontractor costs as a result of higher partner delivery costs associated with increased professional services revenue and (ii) higher personnel-related costs of $5.0$7.7 millionmillion, aspartially adriven result ofby increased headcount.bonus expense compared to prior year.
Gross margin for subscription decreased by threefour percentage points, primarily driven by increased costs associated with third-party data, cloud infrastructure and data.network infrastructure. Gross margin for professional services decreasedincreased by fivethree percentage pointspoints, aslargely wedriven increasedby ourthe investmenttiming inof project initiation and the completion of delivery milestones, including the implementation of CCaaS delivery partners and personnel in fiscal year 2025 to support future growth in our CCaaS solution.projects.
The increase in research and development expense was primarily due to (i) a $3.0 million increase in personnel costs, resulting from higher stock compensation, which was primarily driven by new grants during fiscal year 2026, (ii) a $2.7 million increase in subcontractor and consulting costs, as a result of quality improvement projects implemented in the current fiscal year, and (iii) a $2.1 million increase in software subscription costs. These increases were partially offset by a $3.5 million decrease as a result of an increase in capitalized research and development costs.
The increase in research and development expense was primarily due to (i) an increase in software subscription costs of $1.3 million and (ii) an increase in rent and facilities expenses of $0.5 million. These increases were partially offset by (i) a $0.8 million decrease in travel and entertainment costs and (ii) a $0.5 million decrease in other research and development costs.
The decrease in sales and marketing expense was primarily due to (i) a decrease in personnel costs of $25.2 million, primarily due to lower sales headcount as a result of the restructuring activities we implemented in the first quarter of fiscal year 2026, partially offset by an increase in commissions expense of $4.2 million, and (ii) a decrease in other marketing-related costs of $5.9 million.
Sales and marketing expense remained relatively flat during the year ended January 31, 2025 as compared to the prior-year period. However, the change included a $2.0 million decrease in severance and related costs as a result of fewer sales and marketing employees being included in the restructuring implemented during the year ended January 31, 2025 than the restructuring program implemented during the prior year, which was offset by an increase in travel and related costs of $1.9 million.
The increase in general and administrative expense was primarily due to (i) a $15.5$19.2 million increase in personnel-related costs driven by higher general and administrative headcount, as well as increased stock compensation expense, primarily related to new grants during fiscal year 2025,2026 and (ii) a $10.3 millionan increase in professional and related fees of $1.9 million. These increases were partially offset by (i) lower consulting costs primarilyof related$11.3 to strategic projectsmillion and (iiiii) a $5.7 million increase inlower provision for expected credit losses dueof to$9.3 million as a result of increased reserves for certain customers that we deemed to be uncollectible accounts,accounts asduring wellthe assecond higherquarter calculatedof lossfiscal ratesyear applied to outstanding receivables.2025.
Restructuring Expense
The increase in restructuring expense was due to the reduction in global workforce implemented in the first quarter of fiscal year 2026 impacting 12% of our workforce versus a 3% impact to the workforce as a result of the reduction in global workforce implemented in the second quarter of fiscal year 2025. Refer to Note 14, Restructuring Charges, included in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Form 10-K for additional information.
The decreaseincrease in other income, net was primarily attributable to an $8.2 million increase in net foreign currency gains, partially offset by a $4.2$5.8 million decrease in interest income from our money market and short-term investment accounts as a result of lower interest rates and lower average balances in these accounts, partially offset by higher average interest rates. This decrease was partially offset by a $2.0 million increase in net foreign currency gains.accounts.
Provision (Benefit) Provision for Income Taxes
The increase in provision (benefit) for income taxes was primarily due to the impact of including U.S. profit before tax in the annual effective tax rate computation for the year ended January 31, 2026. For the year ended January 31, 2025, we recorded a net reduction of $96.3 million in our valuation allowance, primarily reflecting the release of our valuation allowance associated with our U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets, and recorded a tax benefit of $2.0 million for non-deductible stock-based compensation. The provision for income tax for the year ended January 31, 2026 also includes (i) a $7.0 million income tax charge for changes to our uncertain tax positions related to our non-U.S. entities and (ii) a $5.1 million income tax charge for non-deductible stock-based compensation.
The decrease in (benefit) provision for income taxes was primarily related to the impact of an $87.1 million valuation allowance release of the Company’s U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets recorded in the year ended January 31, 2025.
We define these non-GAAP financial measures as the respective U.S. GAAP measures, excluding, as applicable, stock-based compensation expense and related charges, amortization of stock-based compensation expense associated with capitalized internal-use software, amortization of acquired intangible assets andassets, release of U.S. federal and state valuation allowances, and the estimated tax effect related to the non-GAAP items, as well as other one-time charges and benefits,charges, such as restructuring charges, costs associated with acquisitions, litigationsnon-recurring litigation costs and facility exit costs. We believe that it is useful to exclude these items in order to better understand the long-term performance of our core business and to facilitate comparison of our results to those of peer companies over multiple periods. In periods of net loss, we calculate non-GAAP net income per share by using non-GAAP net income divided by basic weighted average shares for the period regardless of whether we are in a non-GAAP net income or loss position and assuming that all potentially dilutive securities are anti-dilutive.
(2) Includes $1.1 million, $2.1 million and $1.2 million of employer payroll tax related to stock-based compensation expense of $1.0 million, $1.1 million and $2.1 million for the years ended January 31, 2025,2026, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively.
(3) Relates to costs associated with litigation that arise outside of the ordinary course of business.
(4) Includes employer payroll tax related to restructuring expense of $0.8 million, $0.4 million and $0.4 million for the years ended January 31, 2026, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Refer to Note 14, Restructuring Charges, included in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Form 10-K for additional information.
(1) Includes employer payroll tax related to stock-based compensation expense of $1.0 million, $1.1 million and $2.1 million of for the years ended January 31, 2026, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
(2) Represents the Company’s current and deferred income tax expense commensurate with the non-GAAP measure of profitability using a non-GAAP tax rate of 26.4% for the year ended January 31, 2026. The Company uses an annual tax rate in its computation of the non-GAAP income tax provision and excludes the direct impact of stock-based compensation expense, employer tax costs related to stock-based compensation, intangible amortization expense, amortization of stock-based compensation expense associated with capitalized internal-use software, non-recurring litigation costs, restructuring costs and settlement of prior year tax provisions.
(3) Relates to costs associated with litigation that arise outside of the ordinary course of business.
(4) Includes employer payroll tax related to restructuring expense of $0.8 million, $0.4 million and $0.4 million for the years ended January 31, 2026, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Refer to Note 14, Restructuring Charges, included in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Form 10-K for additional information.
In April 2023, we entered into cash collateral agreements with Silicon Valley Bank in lieu of a letter of credit facility, which are associated with certain leases. Approximately $1.3$1.1 million is outstanding on these cash collateral agreements as of January 31, 2025,2026, which we have therefore classified within restricted cash. As of January 31, 2025,2026, $0.7 million and $0.4 million of this restricted cash is recorded within prepaid expenses and other current assets and $0.6 million is recorded within other non-current assetsassets, respectively, on the consolidated balance sheets.
Starting in 2023, we entered into cash collateral agreements with J.P. Morgan Bank in lieu of a credit facility, through which approximately $6.9$7.4 million is outstanding as of January 31, 2025.2026. As of January 31, 2025,2026, $1.0$1.4 million and $6.0 million of this restricted cash is recorded within prepaid expenses and other current assets and $5.9 million is recorded within other non-current assetsassets, respectively, on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Share Repurchase ProgramPrograms
On January 8, 2024, we entered into an approved share repurchase program (the “2024 Share Repurchase Program”), whereby we could repurchase up to $100 million of our Class A common stock. On both March 26, 2024 and June 3, 2024, our board of directors approved an additional $100 million of repurchases under the 2024 Share Repurchase Program, bringing the total amount authorized for purchase under the 2024 Share Repurchase Program to $300 million.
On June 4, 2025, we announced that our board of directors had authorized and approved a share repurchase plan (the “2025 Share Repurchase Program”), whereby we were authorized to repurchase up to $150 million of Class A common stock. During the year ended January 31, 2024,2026, we repurchased 2,400,33817,616,548 shares of our Class A common stock for an aggregate cost of $29.6$150.4 million, including commissions. Additionally, we repurchased 25,460,052 shares of our Class A common stock for an aggregate cost of $271.0 million, including commissions, during year ended January 31, 2025.million. All of the shares repurchased have been returned to our authorized but unissued share reserve. During the secondthird quarter of fiscal year 2025,2026, we completed the full purchase authorization of $300$150 million under the 20242025 Share Repurchase Program. For additional information regarding the 2024 Share Repurchase Program, see Note 10, Stockholders’ Equity, to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements” of this Form 10-K.
On March 11, 2026, we announced that our board of directors had authorized and approved a share repurchase plan (the “2026 Share Repurchase Program”), whereby we were authorized to periodically repurchase up to $200 million of Class A common stock through March 15, 2027. On March 13, 2026, the Company entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction for $125 million under the 2026 Share Repurchase Program, with the remaining authorization to be utilized at the Company’s discretion over the next year, subject to market conditions and other factors. Repurchases under the program are expected to be funded using cash on hand, cash equivalents, and marketable securities.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
Largest changes
“We are, and may become in the future, subject to securities class actions, derivative suits, or other securities-related legal actions. For example, in August 2024, a putative securities class action was filed against us and certain of our officers alleging violations of the federal securities laws for allegedly making false and misleading statements. …”see in full comparison
We also may become subject to new laws that regulate non-personal data. For example, the EU’s Data Act imposes certain data and cloud service interoperability and switching obligations to enable users to switch between cloud service providers without undue delay or cost, as well as certain requirements concerning cross-border international transfers of, and governmental access to, non-personal data outside the EEA. Depending on how this Act and any similar laws are implemented and interpreted, we may have to adapt our business practices, contractual arrangements, and services to comply with such obligations. In addition, some of our customers may be subject to the EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) and similar UK regulatory requirements on operational resilience. These laws may obligate our customers to impose contractual provisions on us, including certain mandatory third-party risk management provisions. If we fail to comply with relevant contractual requirements, we may be subject to investigations, audits, or other adverse consequences. Moreover, in Europe, the EU’s Network and Information Security Directive (“NIS2”) regulates resilience and incident response capabilities of entities operating in a number of sectors. Non-compliance with NIS2 may lead to administrative fines of a maximum of 10 million euros or up to 2% of the total worldwide revenue of the preceding fiscal year. While NIS2 has not been transposed in all Member States of the EU, we may become directly or indirectly subject to NIS2. In addition, the EU’s Cyber Resilience Act may impose cybersecurity and vulnerability/incident reporting obligations on certain products with digital elements that we make available in the EU market, with reporting vulnerability/incident obligations applying from September 11, 2026 and most other obligations from December 11, 2027. Non-compliance can result in fines of up to 2.5% of global annual turnover for the preceding financial year, market restrictions, and mandatory recalls, and could, if imposed, adversely affect our business, reputation, results of operations, and financial condition. Depending on how these new laws are implemented and interpreted, we may have to adapt our business practices, contractual arrangements, and products to comply with such obligations.see in full comparison
“From time to time, we may be subject to securities class actions, derivative suits, or other securities-related legal actions. For example, we were previously a party to securities class action and stockholder derivative actions, and we may be the target of additional litigation of this type in the future.”see in full comparison
“We have in the past and may in the future be requested to and/or obligated to indemnify our customers or business partners in connection with any such litigation and to obtain licenses or refund subscription fees, which could further exhaust our resources. Even if we were to prevail in the event of claims or litigation against us, any claim or litigation regarding our technology or intellectual property, with or without merit, could be unpredictable, costly and time-consuming, and divert significant resources and the attention of our management and other employees from our business operations. …”see in full comparison
Any litigation also may involve patent holding companies or other adverse patent owners that have no relevant solution revenue, and, therefore, our patent portfolio may provide little or no deterrence, as we would not be able to assert our patents against such entities or individuals. Such “non-practicing entities” and other intellectual property rights holders may attempt to assert intellectual property claims against us or seek to monetize the intellectual property rights they own to extract value through licensing or other settlements.see in full comparisonWe have in the past and may in the future be requested to and/or obligated to indemnify our customers or business partners in connection with any such litigation and to obtain licenses or refund subscription fees, which could further exhaust our resources. Even if we were to prevail in the event of claims or litigation against us, any claim or litigation regarding our technology or intellectual property, with or without merit, could be unpredictable, costly and time-consuming, and divert significant resources and the attention of our management and other employees from our business operations. Such disputes also could disrupt our Unified-CXM platform and products, which would adversely impact our client satisfaction and ability to attract customers. In the case of infringement, misappropriation, or other violation caused by technology that we obtain from third parties, any indemnification or other contractual protections we obtain from such third parties, if any, may be insufficient to cover the liabilities we incur as a result of such infringement or misappropriation.
Our revenue wassee in full comparison$219.5$213.7 million and$205.5$212.0 million for the three months endedAprilJuly30,31, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and $433.2 million and $417.5 million for the six months ended July 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. You should not rely on the revenue growth of any prior quarterly or annual period as an indication of our future performance. Even if our revenue continues to increase, our revenue growth rate may decline in the future as a result of a variety of factors, including the maturation of our business. Overall growth of our revenue depends on a number of factors, including our ability to:
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (25)
•Our recenthistorical revenue growth may not be indicative of our future growth. Our revenue growth also makes it difficult to evaluate our future prospects and may increase the risk that we will not be successful.
•We use artificial intelligence (“AI”) in our products, including agentic AI, which may result in operational challenges, legal liability, reputational concerns, and competitive risks.
Our recenthistorical revenue growth may not be indicative of our future growth. Our revenue growth also makes it difficult to evaluate our future prospects and may increase the risk that we will not be successful.
Our revenue was $219.5$213.7 million and $205.5$212.0 million for the three months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and $433.2 million and $417.5 million for the six months ended July 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. You should not rely on the revenue growth of any prior quarterly or annual period as an indication of our future performance. Even if our revenue continues to increase, our revenue growth rate may decline in the future as a result of a variety of factors, including the maturation of our business. Overall growth of our revenue depends on a number of factors, including our ability to:
We have incurred significant net losses in the past, and we had an accumulated deficit of $296.5$289.4 million and $300.7 million as of AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 and January 31, 2026, respectively. While we have experienced revenue growth and profitability in recent periods, we are not certain whether or when we will obtain sufficient sales to sustain or increase our revenue growth or maintain profitability in the future. We expect that our costs will increase over time, and we could incur future losses, as we expect to invest significant additional funds in our business. In recent years, we have financed our operations principally through subscription payments by customers for use of our Unified-CXM platform. We have expended, and expect to continue to expend, substantial financial and other resources on:
Any failure of our Unified-CXM platform to satisfy customer demands, achieve increased market acceptanceacceptance, or adapt to changing market dynamics would adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, and growth prospects.
Also, while we have incurred an immaterial amount of incremental costs in connection with the 2026 Iran conflict through AprilJuly 30,31, 2026, we may in the future incur additional and unanticipated costs in connection with the current or future conflicts or other force majeure events, which may be significant, in responding to or mitigating the effects of such events, including through emergency data and software transfers, changes to hosting locations, or the relocation of our employees or operations. Any of these impacts could harm our reputation, adversely affect customer relationships, particularly with regulated or public-sector customers, and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our future success will depend on our ability to adapt and innovate. To attract new customers and increase revenue from our existing customers, we will need to enhance and improve our existing platform and introduce new products, features, and functionality. Enhancements and new products that we develop may not be introduced in a timely or cost-effective manner, may contain errors or defects, and may have interoperability difficulties with our Unified-CXM platform or other products. Furthermore, while we generally expect that enhancements and improvements to our products will attract new customers, certain of our customer agreements restrict our ability to materially change the features and functionality of our products or may obligate us to specific configurations or requirements, includingincluding, in some cases, prohibiting the use of AI or generative AI in our products, which could result in violations of those customer agreements, or increased operational difficulties and costs due to our need to deploy different versions of our products to different customers, such as through enabling or disabling certain features, or cause such customers not to renew their agreements (andand, therefore, loss in revenue from such customers) as a result of our new products, features, and functionality. We have in the past experienced, and may in the future experience, delays in our planned release dates of new products, features, and functionality, and there can be no assurance that these developments will be released according to schedule. We also have invested, and may continue to invest, in the acquisition of complementary businesses and technologies that we believe will enhance our Unified-CXM platform. If we are unable to successfully develop, release, acquire, or integrate new products, features, and functionality, or enhance our existing platform to meet the needs of our existing or potential customers in a timely and effective manner, or if a customer is not satisfied with the quality of work performed by us or with the technical support services rendered, our customers may delay or withhold payment to us, cancel their agreements with us, elect not to renew, or make service credit claims, warranty claims or other claims against us, and we could lose future sales. The occurrence of any of these events could result in diminishing demand for our solutions, a reduction in our revenues, an increase in our provision for credit losses or in collection cycles for accounts receivable, or could cause us to incur the risk or expense of litigation.
We use AI tools in our business operations for internal and external uses and develop AI as part of our product offering. Our development and use of advanced AI technologies, including generative and agentic AI, may expose us to additional risks. We are investing in and seeking to accelerate AI capabilities, including agentic AI systems that may increasingly incorporate automation and decision-support capabilities. Although we continue to implement governance processes, controlscontrols, and oversight mechanisms designed to mitigate these risks, such technologies may (i) increase the risk of unintended or harmful outcomes, reduced transparency or explainability, and security or access‑control failures,failures and (ii) present challenges in monitoring autonomous behavior and ensuring accountability and compliance. If we are unable to effectively design, deploy, govern, or control these technologies, our business, reputation, and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Specifically, our employees and personnel use AI technologies to support their work and our internal business operations, including, for example, to assist in daily taskstasks, including, among other things, generating source code used in our products and systems. Output from generative AI may infringe on third-party intellectual property rights without us being aware. Moreover, advanced AI tools, which may produce content indistinguishable from that generated by humans, have a number of benefits, risks, and liabilities, some still unknown. Recent decisions of governmental entities and courts (such as the U.S. Copyright Office, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) interpret U.S. copyright and patent law as limited to protecting works and inventions created by human authors and inventors, respectively. We are therefore unlikely to be able to obtain U.S. copyright or patent protection for works or inventions wholly created by a generative AI tool, and our ability to obtain U.S. copyright and patent protection for source code, text, images, inventions, or other materials, which are developed with some use of AI tools, such as generative AI, may be limited, if available at all. Likewise, the availability of intellectual property protections in other countries is similarly unclear. Additionally, our use of third-party generative AI tools to develop source code, text, images, inventions, or other materials may expose us to greater risks than utilizing contracted human developers, as third-party generative AI vendors may not provide warranties or indemnities with respect to the output generated by such generative AI tools, and generative AI tools may also provide output that appears correct but is erroneous. Furthermore, while we have policies in place to facilitate the use of approved AI tools, some unapproved AI tools may be used in ways or under terms that do not protect the confidentiality of the prompts or inputs that users submit to such tools and may use prompts or inputs to train shared AI models, potentially resulting in third-party users receiving outputs containing information from prompts or inputs (including confidential, competitive, proprietary, or personal data) that were submitted to the tool.
During the threesix months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026, approximately 49%48% of our sales were to customers outside of the Americas. As part of our growth strategy, we expect to continue to expand our international operations, which may include opening additional offices in new jurisdictions, providing our Unified-CXM platform in additional languages, and on-boarding new customers outside the U.S. Any new markets or countries into which we attempt to sell subscriptions to our Unified-CXM platform may not be receptive to our business development activities. We currently have sales personnel and sales, customer, and product support operations in the U.S. and certain countries across Europe, the Asia Pacific region, and the Americas. We believe that our ability to attract new customers to our Unified-CXM platform and to convince existing customers to renew or expand their use of our Unified-CXM platform is directly correlated to the level of engagement we achieve with our customers in their home countries. To the extent that we are unable to effectively engage with non-U.S. customers, we may be unable to effectively grow in international markets.
Our success and ability to compete depend in part upon our ability to obtain, maintain, protect, defend, and enforce our intellectual property. As of AprilJuly 30,31, 2026, we owned 38 U.S. issued patents and 12 pending non-provisional or provisional U.S. patent applications. We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark, and trade secret laws in the U.S. and internationally, as well as technological measures and contractual provisions, such as confidentiality or license agreements with our employees, customers, partners, and other third parties, to establish and protect our brand, maintain our competitive position, and protect our intellectual property rights from infringement, misappropriation, or other violation. However, the steps we take to protect our intellectual property rights may be inadequate or ineffective, and our intellectual property may be challenged, invalidated, narrowed in scope, or rendered unenforceable through administrative processes, including re-examination, inter partes review, interference and derivation proceedings and equivalent proceedings in foreign jurisdictions (e.g., opposition proceedings), or litigation. The steps we take to protect our intellectual property rights may not be sufficient to effectively prevent third parties from infringing, misappropriating, or otherwise violating our intellectual property or to prevent unauthorized disclosure or unauthorized use of our trade secrets or other confidential information. We cannot guarantee that any of our pending applications will issue or be approved or that our existing and future intellectual property rights will be sufficiently broad to protect our proprietary technology.
Any litigation also may involve patent holding companies or other adverse patent owners that have no relevant solution revenue, and, therefore, our patent portfolio may provide little or no deterrence, as we would not be able to assert our patents against such entities or individuals. Such “non-practicing entities” and other intellectual property rights holders may attempt to assert intellectual property claims against us or seek to monetize the intellectual property rights they own to extract value through licensing or other settlements. We have in the past and may in the future be requested to and/or obligated to indemnify our customers or business partners in connection with any such litigation and to obtain licenses or refund subscription fees, which could further exhaust our resources. Even if we were to prevail in the event of claims or litigation against us, any claim or litigation regarding our technology or intellectual property, with or without merit, could be unpredictable, costly and time-consuming, and divert significant resources and the attention of our management and other employees from our business operations. Such disputes also could disrupt our Unified-CXM platform and products, which would adversely impact our client satisfaction and ability to attract customers. In the case of infringement, misappropriation, or other violation caused by technology that we obtain from third parties, any indemnification or other contractual protections we obtain from such third parties, if any, may be insufficient to cover the liabilities we incur as a result of such infringement or misappropriation.
We have in the past and may in the future be requested to and/or obligated to indemnify our customers or business partners in connection with any such litigation and to obtain licenses or refund subscription fees, which could further exhaust our resources. Even if we were to prevail in the event of claims or litigation against us, any claim or litigation regarding our technology or intellectual property, with or without merit, could be unpredictable, costly and time-consuming, and divert significant resources and the attention of our management and other employees from our business operations. Such disputes also could disrupt our Unified-CXM platform and products, which would adversely impact our client satisfaction and ability to attract customers. In the case of infringement, misappropriation, or other violation caused by technology that we obtain from third parties, any indemnification or other contractual protections we obtain from such third parties, if any, may be insufficient to cover the liabilities we incur as a result of such infringement or misappropriation.
From time to time, we may be subject to securities class actions, derivative suits, or other securities-related legal actions. For example, we were previously a party to securities class action and stockholder derivative actions, and we may be the target of additional litigation of this type in the future.
We are, and may become in the future, subject to securities class actions, derivative suits, or other securities-related legal actions. For example, in August 2024, a putative securities class action was filed against us and certain of our officers alleging violations of the federal securities laws for allegedly making false and misleading statements. On March 18, 2025, March 26, 2025, and April 30, 2025, three stockholder derivative actions were filed, purporting to bring claims on behalf of the Company against certain of our current and former directors and officers for alleged violations of the federal securities laws and breaches of their fiduciary duties, among other claims, in relation to substantially the same factual allegations as those made in the securities class action.
In addition, as we continue to expand our business activities, we are accessing additional types and greater volumes of potentially confidential or sensitive information that may subject us to additional privacy and security laws and obligations. For example, in certain limited instances, we have agreed with specific customers to permit the exchange of protected health information through certain approved platform components. Our access to protected health information for specific agreed upon use cases on behalf of those customers that are covered entities and therefore subject to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (collectively, “HIPAA”), may subject us to HIPAA’s specific requirements relating to the privacy, security, and transmission of protected health information. To the extent that we are or may become subject to HIPAA, our failure to comply could result in significant penalties. Additionally, to the extent that additional customers with whom we did not agree to permit the exchange of protected health information through our platforms in their capacity as covered entities nonetheless input or allow such information within the platform in violation of their contractual obligations with us, we could also be subject to additional compliance risks. Other privacy and security obligations may apply to us outside the U.S. if we process health information and other categories of sensitive or confidential information knowingly or unknowingly, and our failure to comply could result in significant penalties. As we expand into more regulated industries, there may be additional obligations regarding the types of data in scope,scope and higher risk due to the sensitivity and potential impact of exposure.
We also may become subject to new laws that regulate non-personal data. For example, the EU’s Data Act imposes certain data and cloud service interoperability and switching obligations to enable users to switch between cloud service providers without undue delay or cost, as well as certain requirements concerning cross-border international transfers of, and governmental access to, non-personal data outside the EEA. Depending on how this Act and any similar laws are implemented and interpreted, we may have to adapt our business practices, contractual arrangements, and services to comply with such obligations. In addition, some of our customers may be subject to the EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) and similar UK regulatory requirements on operational resilience. These laws may obligate our customers to impose contractual provisions on us, including certain mandatory third-party risk management provisions. If we fail to comply with relevant contractual requirements, we may be subject to investigations, audits, or other adverse consequences. Moreover, in Europe, the EU’s Network and Information Security Directive (“NIS2”) regulates resilience and incident response capabilities of entities operating in a number of sectors. Non-compliance with NIS2 may lead to administrative fines of a maximum of 10 million euros or up to 2% of the total worldwide revenue of the preceding fiscal year. While NIS2 has not been transposed in all Member States of the EU, we may become directly or indirectly subject to NIS2. In addition, the EU’s Cyber Resilience Act may impose cybersecurity and vulnerability/incident reporting obligations on certain products with digital elements that we make available in the EU market, with reporting vulnerability/incident obligations applying from September 11, 2026 and most other obligations from December 11, 2027. Non-compliance can result in fines of up to 2.5% of global annual turnover for the preceding financial year, market restrictions, and mandatory recalls, and could, if imposed, adversely affect our business, reputation, results of operations, and financial condition. Depending on how these new laws are implemented and interpreted, we may have to adapt our business practices, contractual arrangements, and products to comply with such obligations.
Even with processes designed to assess the third parties with whom we work, we may not have sufficient knowledge about the locations where such third parties process personal data, the types of data transfers in scope for their processing, how that data is processed, or what data is processed or secured, which may impact the commitments we can make to our customers. Additionally, if the third parties with whom we work, including our vendors or third-party service providers, violate applicable laws, rules, or regulations,regulations or the terms of our commercial agreements with those third parties or our policies, such violations may put our or our customers’ data at risk and could in turn have an adverse effect on our business. Any failure or perceived failure by us or the third parties with whom we work to comply with our data privacy or security obligations to customers or other third parties, or any of our other legal obligations relating to data privacy or security, may result in governmental investigations or inquiries (which have occurred in the past and may occur in the future), enforcement actions, litigation and mass arbitration demands, disputes or other claims, indemnification requests, restrictions on providing our services, claims or public statements against us by privacy advocacy groups or others, adverse press and widespread negative publicity, reputational damage, significant liability or fines, and the loss of the trust of our customers, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
If we or the third parties with whom we work experience a cybersecurity breach or other security incident, any vulnerabilities are identified, or unauthorized parties otherwise obtain access to our customers’ data, our datadata, or our Unified-CXM platform, our Unified-CXM platform may be perceived as not being secure, our reputation may be harmed, demand for our Unified-CXM platform may be reduced, and we may incur significant liabilities.
Some actors now engage and are expected to continue to engage in cyber-attacks, including, without limitation, nation-state actors for geopolitical reasons and in conjunction with military conflicts and defense activities. During times of war and other major conflicts, we, the third parties with whom we work, and our customers may be vulnerable to a heightened risk of these attacks, including retaliatory cyber-attacks, thatwhich could materially disrupt our systems and operations, supply chain, and ability to produce, sell, and distribute our goods and services.
We are, and expect to continue to be, subject to audit by the IRS and other tax authorities in various domestic and foreign jurisdictions. As a result, we have received, and may in the future receive, assessments in multiple jurisdictions on various tax-related matters. Taxing authorities also have challenged, and may in the future challenge, our tax positions and methodologies on various matters. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from ongoing tax examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. These assessments can require considerable estimates and judgments. The calculation of our tax liabilities involves uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws and regulations in a variety of jurisdictions. There can be no assurance that our tax positions and methodologies are accurate or that the outcomes of ongoing and future tax examinations will not have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.condition
Our Class B common stock has ten votes per share, and our Class A common stock has one vote per share. The holders of our Class B common stock as of AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 beneficially held approximately 43.2%42.7% of our outstanding capital stock, but controlled approximately 88.4%88.2% of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock. Therefore, the holders of Class B common stock have control over our management and affairs and over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including election of directors and significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other sale of us or our assets, for the foreseeable future.
As of AprilJuly 30,31, 2026, our directors, executive officers, major stockholders, and their respective affiliates beneficially owned, in the aggregate, approximately 99.0%97.7% of our Class B common stock, and controlled approximately 88.9%87.3% of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock. As a result, our directors, executive officers, and their respective affiliates, if acting together, are able to determine or significantly influence all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the elections of directors, amendments of our organizational documents, and approval of any merger, sale of assets, or other major corporate transaction.
Future transfers of shares of Class B common stock, other than certain permitted transfers under our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, or the voluntary election by holders of shares of Class B common stock to convert the same into shares of Class A common stock will result, after the acquisition of such shares of Class B common stock by the Company, in the issuance by the Company to such holders of an equal number of shares of Class A common stock, which process will have the effect, over time, of increasing the relative voting power of those holders of Class B common stock who retain their shares in the long term. For example, as a result of the combined effect of recent conversions of Class B common stock and corresponding sales by our former Chief Executive Officer and founder and our stock repurchase programs, our largest stockholder, Hellman & Friedman LLC and its associated entities (“H&F”), controlled approximately 49.5%49.4% of the combined voting power of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock as of AprilJuly 30,31, 2026. Accordingly, future transfers or voluntary elections to convert shares of Class B common stock may result in H&F controlling greater than 50% of the combined voting power of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Comparison of the Six Months Ended July 31, 2026 and 2025”
New heading “Cost of Revenue and Gross Margin”
New heading “Research and Development Expenses”
New heading “Sales and Marketing Expenses”
New heading “General and Administrative Expenses”
New heading “Restructuring Expenses”
New heading “Other Income, Net”
New heading “Provision for Income Taxes”
Largest changes
“The fiscal year 2027 amount reflects insurance recoveries and the favorable resolution of certain restructuring-related liabilities related to the global workforce reduction implemented in the first quarter of fiscal year 2026, while the fiscal year 2026 amount reflects costs incurred associated with the same workforce reduction initiative. Refer to Note 13, Restructuring Charges, included in “Part I. Item 1. Financial Statements” of this Form 10-Q for additional information related to our restructuring charges.”see in full comparison
Thesee in full comparisondecreasefiscalinyearrestructuring2027expensesamountwasreflectsprimarilyinsuranceattributablerecoveries related to the global workforce reductioninitiativesimplemented in February 2025, while thefirst quarter offiscal year2026,2026whichamountwerereflectssubstantiallyaccrualcompletedadjustmentsduringassociatedfiscalwithyearthe same workforce reduction. As of July 31, 2026,whereasallnopaymentscomparableassociated with this reduction in global workforcereductionhaveinitiativesbeenwere undertaken in the first quarter of fiscal year 2027.completed. Refer to Note 13, Restructuring Charges, included in “Part I. Item 1. Financial Statements” of this Form 10-Q for additional information related to our restructuring charges.
Restructuring expenses include costs associated with the global workforce reductions implemented in fiscal year 2026. The majority of these costs consist of severance, benefits and the acceleration of equity awards.see in full comparisonWe do not expect to incur any further restructuring expenses with respect to the workforce reductions implemented in fiscal year 2026.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (61)
Our customer base is diverse, spanning global enterprises across a broad array of industries and geographies, as well as marketing agencies, government departments, non-profit, and educational institutions. As of AprilJuly 30,31, 2026, we have customers in more than 90 countries, with our platform supporting over 150 languages.
Remaining Performance Obligation (“RPO”) represents contracted revenue that has not yet been recognized and includes deferred revenue and amounts that will be invoiced and recognized in future periods. Current RPO (“cRPO”) represents contracted revenue that has not yet been recognized and includes deferred revenue and amounts that will be invoiced and recognized in the next 12 months. As of AprilJuly 30,31, 2026, our RPO was $1,038.3$1,026.8 million, and our cRPO was $627.1$614.1 million.
We believe that net dollar expansion rate (“NDE”) is an indicator of the value that our platform delivers to customers. We calculate NDE to measure our ability to retain and expand subscription revenue from our existing customers. NDE compares our subscription revenue from the same set of customers across comparable periods and reflects customer renewals, expansion, contraction, and churn. We calculate NDE by dividing (i) subscription revenue in the trailing 12-month period from those customers who were on our platform during the most recent prior 12-month period by (ii) subscription revenue from the same customers in the preceding prior 12-month period. This calculation is net of upsells, contraction, cancellation, or expansion during the period, but excludes subscription revenue from new customers. Our NDE, on a trailing 12-month basis, was 103.5%102.4% and 101.8%102.2% for the 12-month periods ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
We generate revenue from the sale of subscriptions to our Unified-CXM cloud-based software platform and related professional services.
Cost of subscription revenue consists primarily of costs to host our software platform; data costs, including cost of third-party data utilized in our platform; personnel-related expenses for our subscription and support operations personnel, including salaries, benefits, bonuses and stock-based compensation; professional fees; software costs; travel expenses; the amortization of our capitalized internal-use software; and allocated overhead expenses, including facilities costs for our subscription and support operations. We expect that cost of subscription revenue will increase in absolute dollars as we expand our customer base and make continued investments in our cloud infrastructure and support organization. Furthermore, we estimate that dataAI, data, and hosting costs with various partners may rise in the near term.
Our gross margin on subscription revenue is significantly higher than our gross margin on professional services revenue, and as a result, our gross margin may vary from period to period if our mix of revenue or cost of revenue fluctuates. In addition, because personnel-related expenses represent the largest component of cost of professional services revenue, we may experience changes in our professional services gross margin due to the timing of delivery of those services. We expect that our gross margin will decline in the near term due to higher dataAI, data, and hosting costs, coupled with higher service delivery costs, and, in the long term, will vary from period to period.
Research and development expenses consist primarily of costs relating to the maintenance, continued development and enhancement of our cloud-based softwareUnified-CXM platform and includes personnel-related expense for our research and development organization, including salaries, benefits, bonuses and stock-based compensation, professional fees, travel expenses and allocated overhead expenses, including facilities costs. Research and development expenses are expensed as incurred, except for internal-use software development costs that qualify for capitalization. We expect research and development expenses to generally increase in absolute dollars as we continue to innovate and invest in enhancing and expanding the capabilities of our Unified-CXM platform.
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of personnel-related expenses for our sales and marketing organization, including salaries, benefits, bonuses andcommissions, stock-based compensation, professionalbenefits, fees,payroll softwaretaxes, costs,and bonuses, as well as advertising, marketing, promotional and brand awareness activities, travel expensesexpenses, software costs, allocated rent and allocatedfacility overheadexpenses, expense,and includingreferral facilities costs.fees. Sales commissions earnedand byreferral our sales forcefees are considered incremental and recoverable costs of obtaining a contract with a customer and are deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected period of benefit. We expect sales and marketing expenses to generally increase in absolute dollars as we continue to drive the growth of our business. We continue to optimize our sales and marketing expenses and seek efficiencies in our investments.
Restructuring expenses include costs associated with the global workforce reductions implemented in fiscal year 2026. The majority of these costs consist of severance, benefits and the acceleration of equity awards. We do not expect to incur any further restructuring expenses with respect to the workforce reductions implemented in fiscal year 2026.
Comparison of the Three Months Ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 and 2025
The increase in subscription revenue was primarily attributable to growth from existing customers, driven by customers expanding their use of our platform, both by increasing their subscription volumes and adding new features.features, as well as growth from new customers. These gains were partially offset by non-renewals and reductions in contract size,size and non-renewals, particularly among customers adjusting budgets or deferring investments in response to broader economic pressures.
The increasedecrease in professional services revenue was primarily due to one-time implementation services provided in connection withfor large-scale enterprise projects.projects that occurred in the prior year period, as well as lower managed services activity during the current year period.
The increase in cost of subscription revenue was primarily due to (i) an increase of $5.7$4.3 million in third-party cloud, datanetwork infrastructure, AI, and network infrastructuredata costs, partially attributable to increased customer demand, as well as higher rates from our third-party providers, and (ii) higher personnel-related costs of $1.7$1.6 million, partially driven by increased headcount.
The increasedecrease in cost of professional services revenue was primarily due to (i) a $3.2 million increase in subcontractor costs as a result of higher partner delivery costs and (ii) higherlower personnel-related costs of $1.6 million, partially driven by increased headcount.costs.
Gross margin for subscription decreased by three percentage points, primarily driven by increased costs associated with third-party cloud, data,network infrastructure, AI, and network infrastructure.data. Gross margin for professional services decreasedwas by(25)% eightand percentage(3)% points,during the three months ended July 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively, largely driven by higher delivery costs associated with complex implementations.
The increase in research and development expenses was primarily due to a $1.5 million increase in personnel costs, primarily driven by annual merit increases, which was partially offset by a $0.4 million decrease as a result of an increase in capitalized research and development costs.
Research and development expenses remained relatively flat compared to the prior year period.
Sales and marketing expenses remained relatively flat compared to the prior year period.
The increase in sales and marketing expenses was primarily due to an increase in personnel costs of $5.3 million, including higher amortization expense resulting from previously capitalized sales commissions, and was partially offset by lower operational costs.
The decrease in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to a $1.4 million decrease in professional and related fees, primarily driven by a reduction in legal costs.
General and administrative expenses remained relatively flat compared to the prior year period.
The decreasefiscal inyear restructuring2027 expensesamount wasreflects primarilyinsurance attributablerecoveries related to the global workforce reduction initiatives implemented in February 2025, while the first quarter of fiscal year 2026,2026 whichamount werereflects substantiallyaccrual completedadjustments duringassociated fiscalwith yearthe same workforce reduction. As of July 31, 2026, whereasall nopayments comparableassociated with this reduction in global workforce reductionhave initiativesbeen were undertaken in the first quarter of fiscal year 2027.completed. Refer to Note 13, Restructuring Charges, included in “Part I. Item 1. Financial Statements” of this Form 10-Q for additional information related to our restructuring charges.
The decrease in other income, net was primarily due to (i) higher net foreign currency losses and (ii) lower interest income from money market and short-term investments, resulting from lower average balances and interest rates, and (ii) lower net foreign currency losses.rates.
The increasedecrease in provision for income tax relates primarily to increasesdecreases in the income before provision for income taxes for the three months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 compared to the prior period. The provision for income tax for the three months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 also includes a $3.8 million discrete income tax charge for non-deductible stock-based compensation and a $2.3$(2.7) million discrete income tax charge for changes to our uncertain tax positions related to our non-U.S. entities.
Comparison of the Six Months Ended July 31, 2026 and 2025
Revenue
The increase in subscription revenue was primarily attributable to growth from existing customers, driven by customers expanding their use of our platform, both by increasing their subscription volumes and adding new features, as well as growth from new customers. These gains were partially offset by reductions in contract size and non-renewals, particularly among customers adjusting budgets or deferring investments in response to broader economic pressures.
The decrease in professional services revenue was primarily due to lower managed services activity during the current year period, partially offset by an increase in implementation services.
Cost of Revenue and Gross Margin
The increase in cost of subscription revenue was primarily due to (i) an increase of $10.0 million in third-party cloud, network infrastructure, data, and AI costs, partially attributable to increased customer demand, as well as higher rates from our third-party providers, and (ii) higher personnel-related costs of $3.3 million, partially driven by increased headcount.
The increase in cost of professional services revenue was primarily due to (i) a $3.4 million increase in subcontractor costs as a result of higher partner delivery costs and (ii) higher personnel-related costs of $0.7 million, primarily driven by annual merit increases.
Gross margin for subscription decreased by three percentage points, primarily driven by increased costs associated with third-party cloud, network infrastructure, data and AI. Gross margin for professional services was (13)% and 1% during the six months ended July 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively, largely driven by higher delivery costs associated with complex implementations.
Research and Development Expenses
The increase in research and development expenses was primarily due to a $2.9 million increase in personnel costs partially driven by annual merit increases, which was partially offset by a $1.7 million increase in capitalized research and development costs.
Sales and Marketing Expenses
The increase in sales and marketing expenses was primarily due to a net increase in personnel costs of $5.7 million, largely driven by higher commission costs of $10.0 million from larger deals, partially offset by a $3.1 million decrease in stock-based compensation expense and a $1.3 million net increase in capitalized commissions.
General and Administrative Expenses
The decrease in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to a $1.8 million decrease in the allowance for credit losses. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in personnel-related costs of $1.4 million, partially attributable to increased stock-based compensation expense.
Restructuring Expenses
N.M. - not meaningful
The fiscal year 2027 amount reflects insurance recoveries and the favorable resolution of certain restructuring-related liabilities related to the global workforce reduction implemented in the first quarter of fiscal year 2026, while the fiscal year 2026 amount reflects costs incurred associated with the same workforce reduction initiative. Refer to Note 13, Restructuring Charges, included in “Part I. Item 1. Financial Statements” of this Form 10-Q for additional information related to our restructuring charges.
Other Income, Net
The decrease in other income, net was primarily due to (i) lower net foreign currency gains and (ii) lower interest income from money market and short-term investments, resulting from lower average balances and interest rates.
Provision for Income Taxes
The decrease in provision for income tax relates primarily to decreases in the income before provision for income taxes for the six months ended July 31, 2026 compared to the prior period.
(1) Employer payroll tax related to stock-based compensation for the periods ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 and 2025 was immaterial as to the impact to gross profit.
(2) Includes employer payroll tax related to stock-based compensation expense of $0.5$0.3 million and $0.4$0.1 million for the three months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and $0.8 million and $0.5 million of employer payroll tax related to stock-based compensation expense for the six months ended July 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
(4) Includes employer payroll tax related to restructuring expenses of nil for both the three and six months ended July 31, 2026 and nil and $0.7 million for the three and six months ended AprilJuly 30, 2026 and31, 2025, respectively. Refer to Note 13, Restructuring Charges, included in “Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements” of this Form 10-Q for additional information.
(1) Includes employer payroll tax related to stock-based compensation expense of $0.5$0.3 million and $0.4$0.1 million for the three months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and $0.8 million and $0.5 million for the six months ended July 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
(2) Represents the Company’s current and deferred income tax expense commensurate with the non-GAAP measure of profitability using a non-GAAP tax rate of 26% for both the three and six months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026 and 2025. The Company uses an annual tax rate in its computation of the non-GAAP income tax provision and excludes the direct impact of stock-based compensation expense, employer tax costs related to stock-based compensation, intangible amortization expense, amortization of stock-based compensation expense associated with capitalized internal-use software, non-recurring litigation costs, restructuring costs, and settlement of prior year tax positions.
(4) Includes employer payroll tax related to restructuring expenses of nil for both the three and six months ended July 31, 2026 and nil and $0.7 million,million for the three and six months ended AprilJuly 30, 2026 and31, 2025, respectively. Refer to Note 13, Restructuring Charges, included in “Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements” of this Form 10-Q for additional information.
As of AprilJuly 30,31, 2026, our principal sources of liquidity were $163.3$231.4 million of cash and cash equivalents and $279.5$221.5 million of highly liquid marketable securities. We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities, and cash from operations will be sufficient to meet our working capital needs, capital expenditures, and financing obligations for at least the next 12 months and over the long term. The majority of our cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities is held in the U.S., and we do not anticipate a need to repatriate cash held outside of the U.S. Further, it is our intent to indefinitely reinvest these funds outside the U.S., and, therefore, we have not provided for any U.S. income taxes.
We maintain cash collateral agreements in lieu of letter of credit facilities for certain leases and customer contracts. As of AprilJuly 30,31, 2026, $8.5$8.7 million was outstanding under these cash collateral agreements. For additional information regarding our collateral agreements, see Note 8, Commitments and Contingencies, included in “Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements” of this Form 10-Q.
On March 11, 2026, we announced that our board of directors (the “Board”) had authorized and approved a share repurchase plan (the “2026 Share Repurchase Program”), whereby we were authorized to periodically repurchase up to $200 million of Class A common stock through March 15, 2027. The 2026 Share Repurchase program consists of the following components: (i) a variable tenor accelerated share repurchase agreement (“ASR Agreement”) for $125 million under the 2026 Share Repurchase Program, which was entered into on March 13, 2026, and (ii) an authorization to purchase up to an additional $75 million of Class A common stock at the Company’s discretion over the next year, subject to market conditions and other factors. Repurchases under the program are expected to be funded using cash on hand, cash equivalents, and marketable securities. As of September 1, 2026, a total of 22,118,413 shares of Class A common stock were repurchased, completing the repurchases under the ASR Agreement.
Our net income (loss) and cash flows provided by operating activities are influenced significantly by our investments in headcount to support growth and by cost of revenue incurred to deliver our services. Non-cash charges primarily consist of depreciation and amortization, provision for credit losses, stock-based compensation, non-cash lease expense, deferred income taxes, and accretion on marketable securities. Our largest source of operating cash is collections from customers. Our primary uses of cash from operating activities include employee-related costs, costs to deliver our services, and marketing expenses.
For the threesix months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026, cash provided by operating activities was $70.4$88.5 million, which consisted of net income of $4.2$11.3 million, adjusted for non-cash expenses of $33.3$63.9 million and $32.9$13.3 million of net cash flows provided as a result of changes in operating assets and liabilities. The $32.9$13.3 million of net cash flows provided as a result of changes in our operating assets and liabilities reflected an $81.6$105.1 million decrease in accounts receivable due to collections outpacing billings. This increase to cash flows from operations was partially offset by (i) a $30.7$35.9 million decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities primarily due to the timing of bonusbonus, commission, and commissionincome tax payments, (ii) a $7.2$33.7 million decrease in deferred revenue as a result of recognized revenue exceeding billings, and (iii) aan $6.7$13.3 million increase in prepaid expenses and other assets primarily due to higher deferredcapitalized contractcommissions, costs(iv) a $4.5 million decrease in operating lease liabilities due to ongoing payments for leased properties, and prepaid(v) marketinga expenses,$4.3 partiallymillion offsetdecrease byin theaccounts payable due to timing of vendor prepayments, lower contract asset balances, and reduced prepaid software costs.payments.
For the threesix months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2025, cash provided by operating activities was $83.8$118.6 million, which consisted of net lossincome of $1.6$11.0 million, adjusted for non-cash expenses of $31.7$64.6 million and $53.7$42.9 million of net cash flows provided as a result of changes in operating assets and liabilities. The $53.7$42.9 million of net cash flows provided as a result of changes in our operating assets and liabilities reflected an $81.2$81.0 million decrease in accounts receivable due to collections outpacing billings. This increase to cash flows from operations was partially offset by (i) a $21.5$17.5 million decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities primarily due to the timing of bonuscommission and commissionbonus payments.payments and (ii) a $13.2 million decrease in deferred revenue as a result of recognized revenue exceeding billings.
For the threesix months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026, net cash provided by investing activities was $55.3$104.2 million and primarily consisted of $128.9$187.7 million of sales and maturities of marketable securities. This increase in cash flows from investing activities was partially offset by $69.0 million of purchases of marketable securities.
For the threesix months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2025, net cash used in investing activities was $108.0$15.4 million and primarily consisted of $236.7$269.7 million of purchases of marketable securities,securities and $7.5 million in capitalized internal-use software costs. These decreases in cash flows from investing activities were partially offset by $132.0$262.6 million of sales and maturities of marketable securities.
For the threesix months ended AprilJuly 30,31, 2026, net cash used in financing activities was $124.9$122.4 million, which primarily consisted of the $125.0$125.8 million paymentof payments, including excise tax, associated with the 2025 and 2026 Share Repurchase Program.Programs.
CXM insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 17 filings (7 insiders, 8 trade dates, 932,807 shares, about $5.1M; 6 of these filings say the sales were made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan). Net open-market shares: -932,807 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$5.1M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | Read Rory P |
Open-market sale |
203,666 | $5.17 | $1.1M |
| 2026-09-16 | Thomas Ragy |
Open-market sale | 5,457 | $5.55 | $30.3K |
| 2026-09-16 | Macwan Sanjay |
Open-market sale | 6,936 | $5.55 | $38.5K |
| 2026-09-16 | Corso Joy |
Open-market sale | 34,153 | $5.55 | $189.5K |
| 2026-09-16 | Read Rory P |
Open-market sale | 145,865 | $5.55 | $809.6K |
| 2026-09-16 | Scott Jacob |
Open-market sale | 26,094 | $5.55 | $144.8K |
| 2026-09-16 | Misra Amitabh |
Open-market sale |
29,629 | $5.55 | $164.4K |
| 2026-09-15 | Misra Amitabh |
Open-market sale |
40,000 | $5.73 | $229.2K |
| 2026-08-17 | Ribas Jordi |
Grant/award | 29,850 | — | — |
| 2026-08-15 | Addis Thomas |
Grant/award | 810,372 | — | — |
| 2026-08-10 | Scott Jacob |
Open-market sale |
71,585 | $6.97 | $498.9K |
| 2026-06-22 | Scott Jacob |
Open-market sale |
2,724 | $4.97 | $13.5K |
| 2026-06-17 | Suri Karthik |
Open-market sale |
41,852 | $5.14 | $215.1K |
| 2026-06-16 | Thomas Ragy |
Open-market sale | 6,086 | $5.30 | $32.3K |
| 2026-06-16 | Macwan Sanjay |
Open-market sale | 27,277 | $5.30 | $144.6K |
| 2026-06-16 | Corso Joy |
Open-market sale | 33,635 | $5.30 | $178.3K |
| 2026-06-16 | Read Rory P |
Open-market sale | 143,654 | $5.30 | $761.4K |
| 2026-06-16 | Misra Amitabh |
Open-market sale | 29,180 | $5.30 | $154.7K |
| 2026-06-16 | Suri Karthik |
Open-market sale |
23,507 | $5.30 | $124.6K |
| 2026-06-16 | Scott Jacob |
Open-market sale | 16,380 | $5.30 | $86.8K |
| 2026-06-11 | Ward Jr Stephen M |
Grant/award | 51,021 | — | — |
| 2026-06-11 | Thomas Ragy |
Grant/award | 51,115 | — | — |
| 2026-06-11 | Schloss Eileen |
Grant/award | 41,821 | — | — |
| 2026-06-11 | Haverty Kevin |
Grant/award | 47,025 | — | — |
| 2026-06-11 | Hauser Jan |
Grant/award | 48,326 | — | — |
| 2026-06-01 | Misra Amitabh |
Open-market sale |
45,127 | $5.92 | $267.2K |
Well-known investors holding CXM (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 1,906,791 | $9.8M | 0.01% | Added 18% |
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 1,132,513 | $5.8M | 0.0% | Added 39% |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 462,092 | $2.4M | 0.0% | Reduced 4% |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 342,207 | $1.8M | 0.0% | Added 150% |
| D. E. Shaw & Co. | 2026-06-30 | 217,640 | $1.1M | 0.0% | Added 243% |
| Gotham Asset Management (Joel Greenblatt) | 2026-06-30 | 124,677 | $643.3K | 0.0% | Reduced 33% |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 43,174 | $222.8K | 0.0% | Reduced 69% |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 33,600 | $201.6K | — | Sold out |