DSP 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Viant Technology Inc. · Nasdaq · Services-Computer Programming, Data Processing, Etc. · CIK 1828791 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
Largest changes
“While we have and continue to engage in voluntary initiatives (which may include voluntary disclosures, certifications, and/or goals, among others) to improve the ESG profile of the Company and/or our products, such initiatives may require considerable investments and may not have the desired effect. …”see in full comparison
“Furthermore, industry and market practices may further develop to become even more robust than what is required under any new laws and regulations and may impose added costs on our business and could require us to make changes to our business or platform. ESG performance is monitored and rated by a variety of organizations, and unfavorable ratings may impact investor sentiment and negatively impact our share price as well as our access to and cost of capital. …”see in full comparison
“The legal and regulatory landscape for AI Technologies is rapidly evolving as many U.S. federal, state, and foreign government bodies and agencies have introduced or are currently considering additional laws and regulations. Additionally, existing laws and regulations may be interpreted in ways that would affect the operation of the AI Technologies we provide or use, or could be rescinded or amended as new administrations take differing approaches to evolving AI Technologies. …”see in full comparison
“We expect there will likely be increasing levels of regulation, disclosure-related and otherwise, with respect to ESG matters. For example, various policymakers (including the SEC and State of California) have adopted, or are considering adopting, rules that would require significantly expanded actions or disclosures on climate or other ESG-related matters from companies. Although several of these rules have been challenged and/or stayed, such rules, if implemented, may require us to incur significant additional costs to comply. …”see in full comparison
“Companies across industries are facing scrutiny from a variety of stakeholders related to their ESG and sustainability practices. There is no guarantee that we will be able to meet the evolving standards of such stakeholders, particularly as stakeholder expectations vary and, at times, can conflict. For example, while some policymakers, including the European Union and the State of California, have adopted disclosure and other requirements relating to ESG matters, other policymakers have sought to constrain companies’ consideration of such matters. …”see in full comparison
“We, at times, engage in initiatives to address ESG matters and associated stakeholder expectations; however, such initiatives may not have the desired effect. In addition to costs, our own approach to such matters has changed over time; we expect our approach may continue to change due to a variety of factors, which may be in or out of our control, and we cannot guarantee that our approach will align with the expectations or preferences of any particular stakeholder. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (75)
Our industry is subject to rapid and frequent changes in technology, evolving customer needs and the frequent introduction by our competitors of new and enhanced offerings. We must regularly make investment decisions regarding offerings and technology to maintain the technological competitiveness of our products and services and meet customer demand and evolving industry standards. The complexity and uncertainty regarding the development of new technologies and the extent and timing of market acceptance of innovative products and services create difficulties in maintaining this competitiveness. The success of any enhancement or new solution depends on many factors, including timely completion, adequate quality testing, appropriate introduction and market acceptance. Without the timely introduction of new products, services and enhancements, including those leveraging AI and machine learning, our offerings could become technologically or commercially obsolete over time, in which case our revenue and operating results would suffer. In addition, such new products, services or enhancements may create new, or exacerbate existing, technological, security, legal and other challenges, could cause unintended consequences, and may not perform as intended. If new or existing competitors replicate our offerings or have more attractive offerings, we may lose customers or customers may decrease their use of our platform. New customer demands, superior competitive offerings or new industry standards could require us to make unanticipated and costly changes to our platform or business model. In addition, as we develop and introduce new products and services, including those incorporating or utilizing AI and machine learning and new processing of information, they may raise new, or heighten existing, technological, security, legal and other risks and challenges, that may cause unintended consequences and may not function properly or may be misused by our clients.customers.
In particular, the market for programmatic advertising across most advertising channels, including CTV, streaming audio, digital out-of-home, mobile and desktopdesktop, is an emerging market. Our ability to provide capabilities across most advertising channels, which we refer to as omnichannel, may be constrained if we are not able to maintain or grow advertising inventory for such channels, and some of our omnichannel offerings may not gain market acceptance. We may not be able to accurately predict changes in overall industry demand for the channels in which we operate and cannot assure you that our investment in channel development will correspond to any such changes. For example, the growth in demand for our CTV offering may not continue. Furthermore, if our channel mix changes due to a shift in customer demand, such as customers shifting their usage more quickly or more extensively than expected to channels in which we have relatively less functionality, features or inventory, then demand for our platform could decrease, and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. In addition, our revenue may not necessarily grow at the same rate as spend on our platform. As the market for programmatic buying for advertising matures, growth in spend may outpace growth in our revenue due to a number of factors, including pricing competition, volume discounts and shifts in media, clientcustomer and channel mix, and the composition of offerings provided to our clients.customers. A significant change in revenue as a percentage of spend could reflect an adverse change in our business and growth prospects. In addition, any such fluctuations, even if they reflect our strategic decisions, could cause our performance to fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors, and adversely affect the price of our Class A common stock.
We do not have exclusive relationships with advertising agencies, and we depend on agencies to work with us as they embark on advertising campaigns for their clients.customers. The loss of such agencies could significantly harm our business, operating results and financial condition. If we fail to maintain satisfactory relationships with an advertising agency or an advertising agency otherwise chooses not to do business with us, we risk losing business from the marketers represented by that agency.
Marketers may change advertising agencies. IfWe ahave marketerin switchesthe past lost and could in the future lose revenue from marketers that switch from an agency that utilizes our platform to one that does not, we could lose revenue from that marketer.not. In addition, some advertising agencies have strong relationships with competing DSPsad platforms or other platforms and may direct their marketers to such other platforms. We are primarily focused on the U.S. market, while competing DSPsad platforms may be focused on international markets. Advertising agencies who seek both domestic and international services, or otherwise limit the number or types of DSPsad platforms used, may choose to consolidate with competing DSPs.ad platforms. If a significant number of marketers and their agencies begin to utilize competing platforms for the administration of their advertising campaigns, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
The effects of macroeconomic conditions and geopolitical events, such as inflation, tariffs, changes in trade policies, international conflict, high interest rates and other adverse market events have had, and could in the future have, an adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition.
Our business and operations have been and could in the future be adversely affected by macroeconomic conditions and geopolitical events, such as bank failures, high interest rates, inflationary pressures, tariffs, changes in trade policies, labor shortages, shortages of goods and services, supply chain constraints, pandemics, political election cycles, changes in laws and interpretations of laws, and potential disruptions from international conflicts and acts of terrorism. A recession, depression, or other economic slowdown resulting from macroeconomic conditions and geopolitical events could materially and adversely affect our business and that of our customers or potential customers and our results could fluctuate unpredictably.
Our business depends on the overall demand for advertising and on the economic health of our customers that benefit from our platform. Economic downturns or unstable market conditions may cause our customers to decrease their advertising budgets, which could reduce usage of our platform and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. Our customers’ and potential customers’ businesses or cash flows have recently been and may continue to be negatively impacted by the economic uncertainty related to, among other things, pandemics, bank failures, inflation and monetary supply shifts, labor shortages, supply disruptions, tariffs, tightening of credit markets, political election cycles, changes in laws and interpretations of laws, changes in the volume and relative mix of U.S. government spending, cost-cutting and efficiency initiatives, and potential disruptions from international conflicts and acts of terrorism, which has led and may continue to lead them to reduce their advertising spending and delay their advertising initiatives or technology spending, or attempt to renegotiate contracts and obtain concessions, which may materially and negatively impact our business, operating results and financial condition. Our customers may also seek adjustments to their payment terms, delay making payments or default on their payables, any of which may impact the timely receipt and/or collectability of our receivables. Typically, we are contractually required to pay advertising inventory and data suppliers within a negotiated period of time, regardless of whether our customers pay us on time, or at all, and we may not be able to renegotiatenegotiate better terms. As a result, our financial condition and results of operations have in the past and may in the future be adversely impacted if the business or financial condition of our customers and marketers is negatively affected by macroeconomic conditions and geopolitical events.
We must maintain a consistent supply of ad inventory. Our success depends on our ability to secure inventory on reasonable terms across a broad range of advertising inventory partners in various verticals and formats. The amount, quality and cost of inventory available to us can change at any time. If our relationships with any of our significant suppliers were to cease, or if the material terms of these relationships were to change unfavorably, our business would be negatively impacted. Our suppliers are generally not bound by long-term contracts. We may not have access to a consistent supply of inventory on favorable terms or at all. In addition, we compete with companies with which we have business relationships. For example, Google is an advertising inventory supplier in addition to being one of our competitors. If Google or any other company with attractive advertising inventory limits our access to its advertising inventory, our business could be adversely affected. If our relationships with certain of our suppliers were to cease, or if the material terms of these relationships were to change unfavorably, our business would be negatively impacted. Inventory suppliers control the sales process for the inventory they supply, and their processes may not always work in our favor. For example, suppliers may place restrictions on the use of their inventory, including prohibiting the placement of advertisements on behalf of specific marketers, or seek to sell inventory directly to a marketer or advertising agency instead of, or in addition to, a DSP.demand side platform. Furthermore, the inventory that we access through real-time advertising exchanges may be of low quality or misrepresented to us, despite attempts by us and our suppliers to prevent fraud and conduct quality assurance checks.
As new types of inventory, such as digital advertising for television, become more readily available, we will need to expend significant resources to ensure we have access to such new inventory. Although television advertising is a large market, onlythe a relatively small percentagemajority of it is not currently purchased programmatically. We are investing heavily in our programmatic television offering, including by adding new features, functions and integrations to our platform. If the digital television advertising market does not grow as we anticipate or we fail to successfully serve such a market, our growth prospects could be harmed.
If our access to data related to our Household ID is diminished, the effectiveness of our platform would be decreased, which could harm our operating results and financial condition.
Much of the data that we use is obtained through integrations with third parties. We are dependent upon our ability to obtain necessary data licenses on commercially reasonable terms. We could suffer material adverse consequences if we were unable to obtain data through our integrations with third parties, including inventory and data suppliers. Our suppliers are generally not bound by long-term contracts. We may not have access to a consistent supply of inventory on favorable terms or at all. Our ability to serve particular customers is also enhanced when such customers upload their own first-party data. Our operation of our platform and access to data could be negatively affected if, due to legal, contractual, privacy, reputational, market optics, competition or other economic concerns, third parties cease entering into integration agreements with us or customers cease uploading their data to our platform. Additionally, if our third-party partners, including inventory or data suppliers, fail to adhere to our data quality and privacy standards, we may scale back or terminate relationships with such companies.
Legislators, regulators, and other authorities have focused heavily on third-party data suppliers and the advertising industry in recent years, and we expect this to continue. State Privacy Laws and other U.S. and foreign laws governing Personal Information and privacy pose additional and material compliance risks to such suppliers and companies operating in the advertising industry. In addition, state lawmakers continue to update or enact new laws governing activities of data brokers. For example, instates California,increasingly lawmakersrequire havecompanies introducedlike requirementsours to honor requests submittedto opt out of certain advertising related uses and disclosures of Personal Information through browser-or device-based mechanisms and California will soon require data brokers to honor deletion requests made through a universalcentralized deletionmechanism, mechanismboth thatof thewhich stateincrease wouldour developcompliance andcosts, materially increase potential penalties for non-compliance. Wenon-compliance, and ourpotentially supplierslimit maythe faceavailability complianceof risks under these laws and limitationsdata on our abilityplatform. to use certain data, including data provided by our third-party suppliers, whichThis could impact our business and diminish our revenue.
If we were to lose access to significant amounts of the data that enables our Household ID ("HHID") framework, or the compliance obligations for our suppliers or us become too onerous, our ability to provide products and services to our customers could be materially and adversely impacted, which could be materially adverse to our business, operating results and financial condition.
We do not provide or control the content of the advertisements we serve or that of the websites providing the inventory. Our customers provide the advertising content and inventory suppliers provide the inventory. Both customers and inventory suppliers are concerned about being associated with content they consider inappropriate, competitive or inconsistent with their brands, or illegal, and they are hesitant to spend money without guaranteed brand security. For example, our customers expect that ad placements will not be misrepresented, such as auto-play in banner placements marketed as pre-roll inventory. Consequently, our reputation depends in part on providing services that our customers and inventory suppliers trust, and we have contractual obligations to meet content and inventory standards. We contractually prohibit the misuse of our platform by agencies (and their marketer customers) and inventory suppliers.. Additionally, we use our proprietary technology and third-party services to, and we participate in industry co-ops that work to, detect malware and other content issues as well as click fraud (whether by humans or software known as “bots”) and to block fraudulent inventory. Despite such efforts, our customers may inadvertently purchase inventory that proves to be unacceptable for their campaigns, in which case we may not be able to recoup the amounts paid to inventory suppliers. Preventing and combating fraud is an industry-wide issue that requires constant vigilance, as well as a balancing of cost effectiveness and risk, and we may not be fully successful in our efforts to combat fraud. We may provide access to inventory that is objectionable to our customers or we may serve advertising that contains malware or objectionable content to our inventory suppliers, which could harm our or our customers’ brand and reputation, cause customers to decrease or terminate their relationship with us, cause suppliers to decrease or terminate the inventory supplied to us or their relationship with us, or otherwise negatively impact our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, we may terminate MSAs or IOs in the event clientscustomers violate our ad policies or other contract terms, which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
•negative reception to an acquisition by clients,customers, suppliers, vendors, or investors.
The market for talent in our key areas of operations, including California, is intensely competitive, which could increase our costs to attract and retain talented employees. As a result, we may incur significant costs to attract and retain employees, including significant expenditures related to salaries and benefits and compensation expenses related to equity awards, and we may lose new employees to our competitors or other companies before we realize the benefit of our investment in recruiting and training them. In addition, changes in immigration law may increase competition and increase costs associated with recruiting personnel. We have at times experienced employee turnover. Because of the complexity of our platform, new employees often require significant training and, in many cases, take significant time before they achieve full productivity. Our account managers, for instance, need to be trained quickly on the features of our platform since failure to offer high-quality support may adversely affect our relationships with our customers.
In addition, we derive a significant portion of our revenue from advertising in the CTV, mobile, and desktop channels, which are rapidly evolving, highly competitive, complex and fragmented. We face significant competition in these markets which we expect will intensify in the future. We face significant competition in these channels and others, such as streaming audio and digital billboards,out-of-home, which we expect will intensify in the future.
We are subject to stringent and changing legal obligations related to data privacy and security. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could lead to regulatory investigations or actions, litigation (including class action claims) and mass arbitration demands, litigation and regulatory defense costs, fines and penalties, disruptions of our business operations, reputational harm, loss of customers or sales, revenue declines, increase the cost of data, reduce the availability of data, reduce our ability to utilize or disclose data, and have adverse effects on the demand for our products and services,services or other adverse business consequences.
We collect, receive, store, use, transmit, disclose, or otherwise process (collectively, "Process") Personal Information and other data such as confidential business data, trade secrets, and intellectual property, from and about consumers, our customers, employees, service providers, and other third parties. We also depend on a number of third-party vendors in relation to the operation of our business, some of which Process data on our behalf. Our and our third-party vendorsvendors' handling of this data is subject to a wide variety of federal, state, local, and foreign laws regulations, guidance, industry standards, external and internal privacy and security policies, certifications, documents, contracts, and other obligations that govern the Processing of Personal Information by us and on our behalf.
U.S. federal, state, and local governments, and foreign governments have adopted or proposed numerous laws relating to the Processing of Personal Information relating to individuals and households, including contact information and pseudonymous data,identifiers, many with a particular focus on marketing and advertising uses of such Personal Information. The legal landscape for data privacy issues worldwide is complex, continually evolving and often conflicting, and is likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future. Because many of these laws are new, established interpretations and best practices are still emerging. As a result, regulatorsRegulators could allege that our practices do not comply with such laws or regulations, despite our ongoing efforts to comply. Any failure or perceived failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations regarding privacy, data protection and cybersecurity could adversely affect our business, brand or reputation and may result in claims, actions, investigations or proceedings against us by regulators or individuals and require us to change our practices, all of which may result in significant costs.
In the United States, an ever-increasing number of laws and regulations apply to the Processing of Personal Information. In recent years, the U.S. federal and state legislatures, along with regulatory authorities at the state and federal level, have increased their focus on the collection and use of Personal Information, including relating to “interest-based,” “cross-context behavioral,” or “targeted” advertising. For example, the FTC has been very active in bringing enforcement actions against companies that handle personal data it views as sensitive for advertising purposes, including location data brokers and companies that process health-related data. These enforcement announcementsactions may signal increased ongoing regulatory scrutiny of advertising practicespractices, particularly those that involve “sensitive” categories of personal data such as health data, data related to children and teens, and precise location information. The FTC could expand this focus by acting on new authority to enforce a federal law focused on disclosures of certain information it classifies as sensitive by companies operating as data brokers to certain restricted countries or entities under the control of such countries.
State legislatures have also continued their focus in this area. For example, the State Privacy Laws require covered businesses to, among other things, provide disclosures to consumers and grant consumers a right to opt-out of use and disclosure of their Personal Information for purposes of showing targeted advertisements and “sales” of Personal Information, a concept that is broadly defined as the disclosure of Personal Information to a third party for monetary or other valuable consideration. Certain State Privacy Laws also require or will require companies to respond to user-enabled opt out preference signals or "global privacy controls," such as those expressed through a browser plug-in or privacy setting, device setting, or other mechanisms, that communicate or signal the consumer’s choice to opt-out of the sale or sharing of their Personal Information, or the use of their Personal Information for targeted advertising. Laws additionally require covered businesses to take extra precautions for data deemed “sensitive” and offer consumers rights to access, delete, and correct their Personal Information. These laws are generally enforced by each state’s attorney general with potentially steep penalties for violations.
Lawmakers and regulators are also focused on data Processing by companies that do not have direct relationships with the consumers whose Personal Information they process.sell or share. Several states, including CaliforniaCalifornia, Oregon and Texas, have enacted or updated laws restricting the activities of data brokers, and state attorneys general are keen to enforce these laws, such as by checking companies’ data broker registration status.brokers. In late 2023, California passed the Delete Act, dramatically increasing obligations and potential penalties relative to the state’s preexisting data broker statute. Beyond additional transparency requirements, beginning in August 2026, companies registered as data brokers in California mustwill be required to honor universal deletion requests consumersexpressed makeby ofCalifornia allresidents data brokers viathrough a deletioncentralized mechanism the state will create. Beginning in 2028, data brokers mustwill be required to undergo audits verifying their compliance with the Delete Act. The California Privacy Protection Agency recently released new regulations regarding the Delete Act’s data broker registration requirements including to revise the definition of “data broker.” These obligations may reduce the data available to Viant, require us to develop complex and expensive compliance tools and procedures, and may result in reductions in revenue.
Lawmakers, regulators, and advocates also continue to focus on activities involving the use of certain types of Personal Information perceived as especially sensitive, such as children’s and teen's data, health data, and location data, which will continue to impact the advertising industry. For example, the FTC actively enforces the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 ("COPPA") and recently updated and expanded certain parts of the law, such as by requiring separate consent to disclose children’s personal information to third parties. Additionally, several State Privacy Laws have increased the age at which a consumer can be shown targeted ads (without opt-in consent) from 13 to 16 or 18 years of age, and other state laws may ban targeted advertising to minors outright.
Related to consumer health information, the Washington state My Health My Data Act ("MHMD") introduced a host of new requirements covering a very broadly defined notion of consumer health data, including obligations on disclosures of such data that will impact the advertising industry. MHMD is subject to a private right of action, and plaintiffs’ attorneys could explore claims testing the bounds of the law’s text. Other states (e.g., Nevada) have enacted a similar lawlaws (though without a private right of action), and we expect more states will follow.
These developments and other comprehensive data privacy and security laws that have been proposed at the federal, state, and local levels in recent years could lead to a varied and increasingly complex regulatory landscape, further complicating our compliance efforts and those of our data suppliers and customers. Additionally, plaintiffs have sought to apply decades-old statutes, including federal wiretap and similar laws,laws such asand the Federal Wiretap Act and Video Privacy Protection Act, and similar U.S. state laws, such as California’s Invasion of Privacy Act,Act to certain advertising and online tracking practices. Such lawslaws, which include private causes of action, and couldcan be costly to settle or litigate, regardless of the merit of the claim, and may result in significant monetary liability. In addition, in order to complyhelp with the varying stateavoid data breachbreaches reportingthat are reportable under various U.S laws, we must maintain adequate security measures, which require significant investments in resources and ongoing attention.
Outside the United States, certain laws, regulations, and industry standards may apply to our or our suppliers’ or customers’ data privacy and security practices. The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (“EU GDPR”) and the UK counterpart regulation (“UK GDPR”) (collectively the “GDPR”) imposes strict requirements applicable to certaincompanies Processingtargeting oftheir Europeanservices Personal Information, respectively, in theto EEA and the UK. The applicability analysis under the GDPR is complex, but if we were deemed to operate our business in a manner subject to GDPR, the GDPR provides for significant penalties for noncompliance of up to the greater of €20 million under the EU GDPR / 17.517.2 million pounds sterling under the UK GDPR, or, in each case, 4% of an enterprise’s global turnover (or revenue) for the preceding fiscal year. Companies that violate the GDPR may face prohibitions on data processing and other corrective action, such as class action brought by classes of data subjects or by consumer protection organizations authorized at law to represent their interests. Additionally, EU Member States may assess other penalties for noncompliance on companies subject to GDPR.
We may have to change our business practices to comply with suchany new legal obligations. These changes to the regulatory landscape, coupled with EU and UK regulators’ increasing focus on compliance with requirements related to the online behavioral advertising ecosystemecosystem, could,could limit the ability to obtain data through integrations with data suppliers, divert the attention of our technology personnel, adversely affect our margins, subject us to liabilities, and may require us to make significant operational changes.
Additionally, our employees and personnel use, and increasingly rely on, generative AI and automated decision-making technologies to perform their work and our business offers services that utilize generative AI, and such usage may be subject to various laws and other obligations, including those related to privacy, and governments have passed and are likely to pass additional laws regulating generative AI. For example, the California Privacy Protection Agency is in the process of promulgating regulatory requirements relating to automated decision-making technologies. Our use of this technology could result in additional compliance costs, regulatory investigations and actions, and consumer lawsuits. If we are unable to use generative AI, it could make our business less efficient and result in competitive disadvantages.
Further, privacy advocates and industry groups have proposed, and may propose in the future, industry standards with which we are legally or contractually bound to comply. Moreover, we may make statements about our data Processing practices in light of these standards. For example, best practices and self-regulatory standards, such as those promulgated by the Network Advertising Initiative ("NAI"),Initiative, the Digital Advertising Alliance ("DAA"),Alliance, and their international counterparts, apply to many players in the advertising technology ecosystem. Some of these self-regulatory bodies can discipline members, which could result in fines, penalties, and/or public censure. Additionally, some of these self-regulatory bodies might refer violations of their requirements to the Federal Trade Commission or other regulatory bodies. See “—Our business or ability to operate our platform could be impacted by changes in technology initiated by technology companies, end users, or government regulation. Such developments, including the restriction of “third-party cookies,cookies” and use of automated opt out signals, could cause instability in the advertising technology industry.”
Because the interpretation and application of privacy and data protection laws, regulations, standards and other privacy obligations are uncertain and quickly changing, it is possible that these obligations may be interpreted and applied in manners that are, or are asserted to be, inconsistent with our practices. Preparing for and complying with these obligations requires significant resources. Further, adaptation of the digital advertising marketplace requires increasingly significant collaboration between participants in the market, such as publishers and marketers. Failure of the industry to adapt to changes in data privacy and security obligations and user response to such changes could negatively impact inventory, data, and demand. We cannot control or predict the pace or effectiveness of such adaptation, and we cannot predict the impact such changes may have on our business. In addition, it may be necessary for us to fundamentally change our business activities, information technologies, systems, and practices, and to those of any third parties that Process Personal Information on our behalf.
Further, adaptation of the digital advertising marketplace requires increasingly significant collaboration between participants in the market, such as publishers and marketers. Failure of the industry to adapt to changes in data privacy and security obligations and user response to such changes could negatively impact inventory, data, and demand. We cannot control or predict the pace or effectiveness of such adaptation, and we cannot predict the impact such changes may have on our business. In addition, it may be necessary for us to fundamentally change our business activities, information technologies, systems, and practices, and to those of any third parties that Process Personal Information on our behalf.
We may at times fail or be perceived to have failed to comply with all applicable data privacy and security obligations, despite our efforts to comply. Moreover, despite our efforts, our customers, personnel or third parties upon whom we rely may fail to comply with such obligations, which could negatively impact our business operations and compliance posture. For example, any failure by a third-party processor to comply with applicable law, regulations, or contractual obligations could result in adverse effects, including inability to operate our business and proceedings against us by governmental entities or others. Any inability, or perceived inability, to address or comply with applicable data privacy or security obligations could result in significant consequences, including, but not limited to, government enforcement actions (e.g., investigations, fines, penalties, audits, inspections, and similar); litigation (including class-related claims) and mass arbitration demands; additional reporting requirements and/or oversight; bans on Processing Personal Information; and orders to destroy or not use Personal Information.Information or AI models. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, or financial condition, including but not limited to: loss of customers, additional costs and liabilities, damage our reputation, reduction in sales and demand for our platform, and harm our business.
Plaintiffs have also become increasingly more active in bringing privacy-related claims against companies, including class action claims and mass arbitration demands. Some of these claims allow for the recovery of statutory damages on a per violation basis; if viable, these claims carry the potential for monumental statutory damages, depending on the volume of data and the number of violations.
Our business or ability to operate our platform could be impacted by changes in technology initiated by technology companies, end users, or government regulation. Such developments, including the restriction of “third-party cookies,” and use of automated opt out signals, could cause instability in the advertising technology industry.
Digital advertising and in-app advertising are largely dependent on established technology companies and their operation of the most commonly used Internet browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer and Safari), devices and their operating systems (Android and iOS). These companies have changed and may continue to change the operations or policies of their browsers, devices and operating systems in a manner that fundamentally changes our ability to operate our platform or collect data. Users of these browsers, devices or operating systems may also adjust their behaviors and use of technology in ways that change our ability to collect data. Digital advertising and in-app advertising are also dependent, in part, on internet protocols and the practices of internet service providers, including IP address allocation. Changes that these providers make to their practices, or adoption of new internet protocols, may materially limit or alter the availability or quality of data. A limitation or alteration of the availability of data in any of these or other instances may have a material impact on the advertising technology industry, which could decrease advertising budgets and subsequently reduce our revenue and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
For example, in recent years browser providers have enacted and may continue to enact changes restricting the use of third-party cookies in their browsers, which may cause instability in the digital advertising market. Execution and measurement in digital advertising relies to a significant extent on the use of cookies, pixels and other similar technology, including mobile device identifiers that are provided by mobile operating systems for advertising purposes, to collect data about users and devices (collectively referred to as "cookies"). Although we believe our business is less reliant on cookies than some of our competitors because we do not need cookies for marketers and their advertising agencies to identify consumers with our identity resolution capabilities and identity graph, we do use third-party cookies in connection with obtaining information about consumers, and for delivering digital advertising. Today, Apple's Safari, Mozilla's Firefox and Microsoft's Edge already block third-party cookies by default. Google's web browser, Chrome, offers controls over third-party cookies and, while it no longer plans to deprecate support for third-party cookies and user agent string entirely, Google has committed to enhancing its “Privacy Sandbox” label, which may result in modified targeting and measurement functionality to digital advertising ecosystem participants, and the introduction of new browser-level controls on Chrome, which will allow users to make an informed choice regarding cookies that will apply across their web browsing. We believe that Google’s ongoing development of these technologies, which we expect to be technically complex and designed in a manner that does not favor us or our partners, has created and will likely continue to create industry uncertainty regarding the potential effects on user experience and advertiser targeting and measurement. Although we believe our platform is well-positioned to adapt to such changes, particularly with our HHID,HHID and IRIS_ID, the impact of such changes remains uncertain and could be more disruptive than we anticipate, including to the display advertising ecosystem in particular, where such changes could adversely impact our growth in that channel. Google has also introduced ad blocking software in its Chrome web browser that will block certain ads based on quality standards established under a multi-stakeholder coalition. Other browsers have added similar controls. These actions will have significant impacts on the digital advertising and marketing ecosystems in which we operate, which could cause changes in advertising budget allocations and thereby could negatively impact our business. In addition, these browser and platform providers may frequently delay or change their previously announced operations or policies.
For in-app advertising, data regarding interactions between users and devices are tracked mostly through stable, pseudonymous mobile device identifiers that are built into the device operating system with privacy controls that allow users to express a preference with respect to data collection for advertising, including to disable the identifier. These identifiers and privacy controls are defined by the developers of the mobile platforms and could be changed by the mobile platforms in a way that may negatively impact our business. For example, Apple introduced an iOS update in April 2021 that requires users to opt-in to tracking of their activity across devices, and Google has announced that it will eventually deprecate its Android advertising identifier entirely.devices. Privacy aspects of other channels for programmatic advertising, such as CTVs or over-the-top video, are still developing. Technical or policy changes, including regulation or industry self-regulation, could harm our growth in those channels.
Digital advertising is also subject to government regulation which may impact our ability to collect and use data. As the collection and use of data for digital advertising has received ongoing media attention over the past several years, some government regulators,regulators such as the FTC, California Privacy Protection Agency, and state Attorneys General, as well as privacy advocatesadvocates, have raised significant concerns around observed data,data leadingand targeted advertising. This has led to an array of ‘do-not-track’laws and similarpending opt-outlegislation efforts,permitting suggestionsindividuals to easily opt out of targeted advertising through "universal opt out mechanisms" or "opt out preference signals" and technologiesdeveloping introducedsuch totechnical address these concerns,mannerisms and individuals are increasingly aware of these options. ForCalifornia example,recently severalpassed legislation requiring browser manufacturers to provide easily locatable and configurable functionality that allows consumers to send such signals directly through their browsers. As a result, the number of theconsumers Stateusing Privacysuch Lawssignals obligateis companieslikely to honor requests to opt out of targeted advertising or sales of personal information transmitted via user-enabled Global Privacy Control.rise.
Further, we rely upon third-party service providers and technologies to operate critical businessIT systemsSystems and to process Confidential Data, including, without limitation, third-party providers of cloud-based infrastructure such as Google Cloud Platform and Amazon Web Services, employee email, and other functions. We may share or receive Confidential Data with or from third parties. Our ability to monitor these third parties’ security practices is limited, and these parties may not have adequate information security measures in place. If our third-party service providers experience a security incident or other interruption, we could experience adverse consequences. While we may be entitled to damages if our third-party service providers fail to satisfy their privacy or security-related obligations to us, any award may be insufficient to cover our damages, or we may be unable to recover such award. Similarly, supply-chain attacks have increased in frequency and severity, and third parties and infrastructure in our supply chain or our third-party partners’ supply chains may become compromised or contain exploitable defects or bugs that could result in a breach of or disruption to our IT Systems (including our products/services) or the third-party information technology systems that support us and our services.
Future or past business transactions (such as acquisitions or integrations) could expose us to additional cybersecurity risks and vulnerabilities, as our systemsIT Systems could be negatively affected by vulnerabilities present in acquired or integrated entities’ systems and technologies. Furthermore, we may discover security issues that were not found during due diligence of such acquired or integrated entities, and it may be difficult to integrate companies into our informationIT technology environmentSystems and security program.
Remote work has become more common and has increased risks to our informationIT technologySystems systemsConfidential and data,Data, as more of our employees utilize network connections, computers and devices outside our premises or network, including working at home, while in transit and in public locations.
In addition to experiencing a security incident, third parties may gather, collect, or infer sensitive information about us from public sources, data brokers, or other means that reveals competitively sensitive details about our organization and could be used to undermine our competitive advantage or market position. Additionally, confidentialConfidential or proprietary informationData of the Company or our customers could be leaked, disclosed, or revealed as a result of or in connection with our employee’s, personnel’s, or vendor’s use of generative AI technologies.
We use AI, machine learning, and automated decision-makingAI technologies, including our ViantAI product suite,suite (collectively, “AI Technologies”), throughout our business, and are making significant investments in this area. For example, our ViantAI suite currently includes AI Planning, which enables media planners to design high-impact campaigns in seconds, and AI Bidding, which optimizes inventory costs by lowering the effective cost per mille ("eCPM") through automated bid adjustments. Looking ahead, our ViantAI product roadmap featuresadjustments, AI Measurement and Analysis, providingwhich provides accessible measurement and insights via a user-friendly chat interface, and recently released, AI Decisioning, which empowersautomates anplanning, AIexecution, agentmeasurement toand dynamicallydynamic optimizeoptimization of campaigns in real-timereal by leveraging advanced ad strategies such as channel allocation, publisher selection, dayparting, and audience discovery.time.
InOur particular,deployment ifof AI Technologies presents particular risks. For example, the models underlying our AI Technologies aremay be incorrectly designed or implemented; and exhibit defects. ViantAI uses machine learning trained oron reliantyears of data; however, in any given use case, any data on which our AI Technologies are trained may be incomplete, inadequate, inaccurate, biased or otherwise poor-qualitypoor-quality. data,As a result, ViantAI could produce inaccurate, unexpected or onunfavorable data to which we do not have sufficient rightsresults or in relation to which webehaviors, and/ therefore poorly-designed or executed campaigns, sub-optimal ad placement, targeting, or bidding, or misleading insights for our customers. In turn, these effects could reduce click-through rates, conversion rates, and ROAS. Any of the providersforegoing ofcould such data have not implemented sufficient legal compliance measures; used without sufficient oversight and governance to ensure their responsible use; and/or adversely impacted by unforeseen defects, technical challenges, cybersecurity threats or material performance issues,impair the performance of our products, services and business, as well as our reputation and the reputations of our customers, could suffer orand we could incur liability resulting from the violation of laws or contracts to which we are a party or civil claims.
WithThe respectmarket tofor ourproducts solutionsand services that incorporate AI Technology, the market forTechnologies such productsas and servicesViantAI is rapidly evolving and unproven in many industries, including our own, and important assumptions about the characteristics of targeted markets, pricing, sales cycles, cost, performance, and perceived value associated with our services or products may be inaccurate. We cannot be sure that the market will continue to grow or that it will grow in ways we anticipate. In addition, market acceptance of solutions that incorporate AI Technology is uncertain.uncertain, and the evolution of the use of AI and machine learning in digital advertising may create challenges and further ecosystem uncertainty. Our failure to successfully develop and commercialize solutions involving AI Technologies could depress the market price of our stock and impair our ability to: raise capital; expand our business; provide, improve and diversify our solutions; continue our operations and efficiently manage our operating expenses; and respond effectively to competitive developments. There can be no assurance that our AI initiatives will enhance our platform, products, or services as expected.
In addition to our ViantAI product suite, we use AI Technologies licensed from third parties in our solutions and our operations and our ability to continue to use such technologies at the scale we need may be dependent on access to specific third-party software and infrastructure. We cannot control the availability or pricing of such third-party AI Technologies, especially in a highly competitive environment, and we may be unable to negotiate favorable economic terms with the applicable providers. If any such third-party AI Technologies become incompatible with our solutions or unavailable for use, or if the providers of such models unfavorably change the terms on which their AI Technologies are offered or terminate their relationship with us, our solutions may become less appealing to our customerscustomers, and our business will be harmed. In addition, to the extent any third party AI Technologies are used as a hosted service, any disruption, outage, or loss of information through such hosted services could disrupt our operations or solutions, damage our reputation, cause a loss of confidence in our solutions, or result in legal claims or proceedings, for which we may be unable to recover damages from the affected provider.
The legal and regulatory landscape for AI Technologies is rapidly evolving as many U.S. federal, state, and foreign government bodies and agencies have introduced or are currently considering additional laws and regulations. Additionally, existing laws and regulations may be interpreted in ways that would affect the operation of the AI Technologies we provide or use, or could be rescinded or amended as new administrations take differing approaches to evolving AI Technologies. As a result, implementation standards and enforcement practices are likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future, and we cannot yet completely determine the impact future laws, regulations, standards, or market perception of their requirements may have on our business and may not always be able to anticipate how to respond to these laws or regulations. It is possible that evolution of the legal and regulatory landscape limits our ability to use AI Technologies for our business, or require us to change the way we use AI Technologies in a manner that negatively affects the performance of our offerings. We may need to expend resources to adjust our products or services in certain jurisdictions if laws or regulations are not consistent across jurisdictions. Further, the cost to comply with such laws and regulations could be significant and would increase our operating expenses (such as by imposing additional reporting obligations regarding our use of AI Technologies). Such an increase in operating expenses, as well as any actual or perceived failure to comply with such laws and regulations, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to protect proprietary methods and technologies that we develop or otherwise acquire, so that we can prevent others from using our inventions and proprietary information. If we fail to protect our intellectual property rights adequately, our competitors might gain access to our technologytechnology, and our business might be adversely affected. We rely upon a combination of patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, as well as third-party confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements, to establish and protect our proprietary rights. Establishing trade secret, copyright, trademark, domain name, and patent protection can be difficult and expensive, the laws, procedures and restrictions may provide only limited protection, and protection may not be available for some of our technology, in particular technology that uses open-source software. It may be possible for unauthorized third parties to copy or reverse engineer aspects of our technology or otherwise obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary, or to develop technologies similar or superior to our technology or design around our proprietary rights, despite the steps we have taken to protect our proprietary rights. Our contracts with our employees and contractors that relate to intellectual property issues generally restrict the use of our confidential information solely in connection with our services. However, the theft or misuse of our proprietary information could occur by employees or contractors who have access to our technology.
While we have issued patents and patent applications pending, we may be unable to obtain patent protection for the technology covered in our patent applications or such patent protection may not be obtained quickly enough to meet our business needs. Furthermore, the patent prosecution process is expensive, time-consuming, and complex, and we may not be able to prepare, file, prosecute, maintain, and enforce all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. Moreover, there is significant uncertainty as to the patentability of technology created with the assistance of artificial intelligence. As a result, certain of our patents may be at risk, and pending or future patent applications may be more costly to prosecute, may result in issued patents of limited scope, if such patents are issued patents at all. The scope of patent protection can also can be reinterpreted after issuance and issued patents may be invalidated. Even if our patent applications do issue as patents, they may not issue in a form that is sufficiently broad to protect our technology, prevent competitors or other third parties from competing with us or otherwise provide us with any competitive advantage.
There is significant patent and other intellectual property development activity in the digital advertising industry. Third-party intellectual property rights may cover significant aspects of our technologies or business methods or block us from expanding our offerings. Our success depends on the continual development of our platform. From time to time, we receive claims from third parties that our platform and underlying technology infringe or violate such third parties’ intellectual property rights. To the extent we gain greater public recognition, we may face a higher risk of being the subject of intellectual property claims. In addition, various "non-practicing entities" that own patents and other intellectual property rights haveare and may continue to aggressively assert their rights in order to extract value from us. Furthermore, from time to time we may introduce or acquire new products, including in areas where we historically have not competed, which could increase our exposure to patent and other intellectual property claims from competitors and non-practicing entities. The cost of settling or defending against intellectual property claims, whether or not the claims have merit, is significant, regardless of whether we are successful in our defense, and diverts the attention of management, technical personnel and other employees from our business operations. Litigation regarding intellectual property rights is inherently uncertain due to the complex issues involved, and we may not be successful in defending ourselves in such matters. Additionally, we may be obligated to indemnify our customers or inventory and data suppliers or other vendors in connection with any such litigation. If we are found to infringe these rights, we could potentially be required to cease utilizing portions of our platform. We may also be required to develop alternative non-infringing technology, which could require significant time and expense. Alternatively, we could be required to pay royalty payments, either as a one-time fee or ongoing, as well as damages for past use that was deemed to be infringing. If we cannot license or develop technology for any allegedly infringing aspect of our business, we would be forced to limit our service and may be unable to compete effectively. Any of these results could harm our business.
Advertising often results in litigation relating to copyright or trademark infringement, public performance royalties or other claims based on the nature and content of advertising that is distributed through our platform. Though we contractually require clientscustomers to represent to us that they have the rights necessary to serve advertisements through our platform, we do not independently verify whether we are permitted to deliver, or review the content of, such advertisements. If clientscustomers do not have the rights necessary to serve advertisements through our platform, we may be exposed to potential liabilityliability, and our reputation may be damaged. While our customers are typically obligated to indemnify us, such indemnification may not fully cover us, or we may not be able to collect. In addition to settlement costs, we may be responsible for our own litigation costs, which can be extensive.
We anticipate that Viant Technology LLC will continue to be treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes and, as such, generally will not be subject to any entity-level U.S. federal income tax. Instead, taxable income will be allocated to the members of Viant Technology LLC. Accordingly, we are required to pay income taxes on our allocable share of any net taxable income of Viant Technology LLC. WeAs its sole managing member and pursuant to the Viant Technology LLC Operating Agreement, we cause Viant Technology LLC to make distributions to each of its members, including us, in an amount intended to enable each member to pay all applicable taxes on taxable income allocable to such member and to allow us to make payments under a tax receivable agreement (the "Tax Receivable Agreement") we entered into on February 9, 2021, in connection with our IPO, with Viant Technology LLC, continuing members of Viant Technology LLC and the representative of such continuing members of Viant Technology LLC (the "TRA Representative"). In addition, Viant Technology LLC reimburses us for corporate and other overhead expenses. If the amount of tax distributions to be made exceeds the amount of funds available for distribution, we shall receive the full amount of our tax distribution before the other members receive any distribution and the balance, if any, of funds available for distribution shall be distributed to the other members pro rata in accordance with their assumed tax liabilities. To the extent that we need additional funds to cover our obligations, and Viant Technology LLC is restricted from making such distributions under applicable laws or regulations, or is otherwise unable to provide such funds, we may have to borrow funds, which could materially and adversely affect our ability to pay dividends and taxes and other expenses, including payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, and affect our liquidity and financial condition.
The actual increase in tax basis, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, will vary depending on a number of factors, including the price of our Class A common stock at the time of the exchange; the timing of future exchanges; the extent to which exchanges are taxable; the amount and timing of the utilization of tax attributes; the amount, timing and character of our income; the U.S. federal, state and local tax rates then applicable; the amount of each exchanging unitholder’s tax basis in its units at the time of the relevant exchange; the depreciation and amortization periods that apply to the increases in tax basis; the timing and amount of any earlier payments that we may have made under the Tax Receivable Agreement and the portion of our payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement that constitute imputed interest or give rise to depreciable or amortizable tax basis. The increases in the tax basis of the intangible assets of Viant Technology LLC as a result of the exchanges of Viant Technology LLC units and certain other tax benefits will be subject to the TRA. However,As of December 31, 2025, we have concluded that basedit onwas themore weightlikely ofthan allnot availablethat evidence theseour deferred tax assets subject to the TRATax areReceivable notAgreement morewill likelybe thanrealized. notTherefore, ofwe being realized, and asrecorded a result no liability has been recorded related to the remaining tax savings we may realize from utilization of such deferred tax assets. As of December 31, 2025, the total TRA liability is approximately $12.4 million. If utilization of the deferred tax assetsasset subject to the TRA becomebecomes not more likely than not toin bethe realized,future, we willmay recordreverse suchthe liability.liability related to the TRA. Upon recognition of the TRA, there may be a material negative effect on our financial condition and liquidity if, as described below, the payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement exceed the actual benefits we receive in respect of the tax attributes subject to the Tax Receivable Agreement and/or distributions to us by Viant Technology LLC are not sufficient to permit us to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement.
The Tax Receivable Agreement provides that if (i) we exercise our right to early termination of the Tax Receivable Agreement in whole (that is, with respect to all benefits due to all beneficiaries under the Tax Receivable Agreement) or in part (that is, with respect to some benefits due to all beneficiaries under the Tax Receivable Agreement), (ii) we experience certain changes in control, (iii) the Tax Receivable Agreement is rejected in certain bankruptcy proceedings, (iv) we fail (subject to certain exceptions) to make a payment under the Tax Receivable Agreement within 180 days after the due date or (v) we materially breach our obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement, we will be obligated to make an early termination payment to holders of rights under the Tax Receivable Agreement equal to the present value of all payments that we would be required to pay under the Tax Receivable Agreement. The amount of such payments will be determined on the basis of certain assumptions in the Tax Receivable Agreement, including (i) the assumption that we would have enough taxable income in the future to fully utilize the tax benefit resulting from the tax assets that are the subject of the Tax Receivable Agreement,Agreement; (ii) the assumption that any item of loss deduction or credit generated by a basis adjustment or imputed interest arising in a taxable year preceding the taxable year that includes an early termination will be used by us ratably from such taxable year through the earlier of (x) the scheduled expiration of such tax item or (y) 15 years; (iii) the assumption that any non-amortizable assets are deemed to be disposed of in a fully taxable transaction on the fifteenth anniversary of the earlier of the basis adjustment and the early termination date; (iv) the assumption that U.S. federal, state and local tax rates will be the same as in effect on the early termination date, unless scheduled to change; and (v) the assumption that any units of Viant Technology LLC (other than those held by us) outstanding on the termination date are deemed to be exchanged for an amount equal to the market value of the corresponding number of shares of Class A common stock on the termination date. Any early termination payment may be made significantly in advance of the actual realization, if any, of the future tax benefits to which the termination payment relates. The amount of the early termination payment is determined by discounting the present value of all payments that would be required to be paid by us under the Tax Receivable Agreement at a rate equal to the lesser of (a) 6.5% and (b) the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, as reported by the Wall Street Journal plus 400 basis points.
Payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement will be based on the tax reporting positions that we will determine and the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") or another tax authority may challenge all or part of the tax basis increases, as well as other related tax positions we take, and a court could sustain such challenge. If any tax benefits that have given rise to payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement are subsequently disallowed, we would be entitled to reduce future amounts otherwise payable to a holder of rights under the Tax Receivable Agreement to the extent the holder has received excess payments. However, the required final and binding determination that a holder of rights under the Tax Receivable Agreement has received excess payments may not be made for a number of years following commencement of any challenge, and we will not be permitted to reduce our payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement until there has been a final and binding determination, by which time sufficient subsequent payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement may not be available to offset prior payments for disallowed benefits. We will not be reimbursed for any payments previously made under the Tax Receivable Agreement if the basis increases or other tax attributes described above are successfully challenged by the IRS or another taxing authority. As a result, in certain circumstances, payments could be made under the Tax Receivable Agreement that are significantly in excess of the benefit that we actually realize in respect of the increases in tax basis (and utilization of certain other tax benefits) and we may not be able to recoup those payments, which could adversely affect our financial condition and liquidity.
As a result of potential differences in the amount of net taxable income allocable to us and to the existing members of Viant Technology LLC, as well as the use of an assumed tax rate in calculating Viant Technology LLC’s distribution obligations, we may receive distributions of cash significantly in excess of our tax liabilities and obligations to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement. We have no obligation to distribute any such excess distributions (or other available cash) to our stockholders. We may choose to manage these excess distributions through a number of different approaches, including, among other uses, the payment of a cash dividend on our Class A common stock, the payment of obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement, loaning such cash to Viant Technology LLC, the declaration of a stock dividend on our Class A common stock, along with the purchase of a corresponding number of common units in Viant Technology LLC, or the purchase of additional common units in Viant Technology LLC, along with a recapitalization of all of the outstanding common units in Viant Technology LLC. We are not required to make adjustments to the exchange ratio for LLC interestsunits and corresponding shares of Class A common stock as a result of any cash dividend or excess distribution or any retention of cash by us. As a result, the holders of Viant Technology LLC interestsunits (other than us) may benefit from any value attributable to such cash balances if they acquire shares of Class A common stock in exchange for their LLC interests,units, notwithstanding that such holders may have participated previously as holders of LLC interestsunits in distributions that resulted in such excess cash balances to us.
Tax laws applicable to our business activities are subject to interpretation. We are subject to audit by the Internal Revenue ServiceIRS and by taxing authorities in the state and local jurisdictions in which we operate. Our tax obligations are based on how tax authorities in such jurisdictions assess revenue-based taxes such as sales and use taxes. Taxing authorities mayare and havemay challengedcontinue to challenge our tax positions and methodologies including our positions regarding the collection of sales and use taxes and the jurisdictions in which we are subject to taxes, which could expose us to additional taxes and penalties. Defending against such audits can result in significant legal and administrative costs and divert management’s attention and resources. In addition, our future tax expense could increase as a result of changes in tax laws, regulations or accounting principles, or changes in the interpretation of the same, or as a result of earning income in jurisdictions that have higher tax rates. Further, several jurisdictions have proposed or enacted taxes applicable to digital services, which include business activities on digital advertising and which may increase our tax obligations in such jurisdictions. An increase in our tax expense and/or penalties could have a negative effect on our financial position and results of operations. Moreover, the determination of our provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities requires significant estimates and judgment by management, and the tax treatment of certain transactions is uncertain. Although we believe we make reasonable estimates and judgments, the ultimate outcome of any particular issue may differ from the amounts previously recorded in our financial statements and any such occurrence could materially affect our financial position and results of operations.
Our quarterly and annual operating results have fluctuated in the past and we expect our future operating results to fluctuate due to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. In particular, we offer our customers a choice of two different pricing options: a percentage of spend option and a fixed CPM pricing option. We also offer our customers the ability to use our services to aid them in data management, media execution and advanced reporting. Our revenue and contribution ex-TAC vary across these different pricing and service options, and therefore our results may vary based on the mix of pricing and service options chosen by customers in any given period. Contribution ex-TAC is a non-GAAP financial measure. For a detailed discussion of our key operating and financial performance measures and a reconciliation of contribution ex-TAC to the most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation—Key Operating and Financial Performance Measures—Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures.” The varying nature of our pricing mix between periods may make it more difficult for us to forecast our future operating results. Further, variation in our pricing mix may make it more difficult to make comparisons between prior, current and future periods. Period-to-period comparisons of our operating results should not be relied upon as an indication of our future performance. Fluctuations in our operating results could cause our performance to fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors and adversely affect the price of our Class A common stock. Because our business is changing and evolving rapidly, and the macroeconomic and geopolitical environment continues to evolve as a result of pandemics, bank failures, labor shortages, supply chain disruptions, tariffs, inflation and monetary supply shifts, high interest rates, tightening of credit markets, political election cycles, changes in laws and interpretations of laws, changes in the volume and relative mix of U.S. government spending, cost-cutting and efficiency initiatives and potential disruptions from international conflicts and acts of terrorism, our historical operating results may not be necessarily indicative of our future operating results. In addition to changes in terms of mix of our different pricing options, factors that may cause our operating results to fluctuate include the following:
•customer purchasing preferences that result in changes to our channel mix (including, for example, changes in demand for CTV and other emerging digital channels);
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “The following discusses our financial condition and results of operations for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 compared to our fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 as well as discussions of our financial condition and results of operations for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 compared to our fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.”
New heading “Income Taxes and Tax Receivable Agreement”
New heading “Fiscal Year 2023 Changes in Cash Flows”
New heading “Income Taxes and Tax Receivable Agreement”
Removed heading “The following discusses our financial condition and results of operations for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 compared to our fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 as well as discussions of our financial condition and results of operations for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 compared to our fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.”
Removed heading “Tax Receivable Agreement”
Removed heading “Fiscal 2023 Changes in Cash Flows”
Largest changes
“The Amended Loan Agreement contains customary conditions to borrowings, events of default and covenants, and also contains a financial covenant requiring us to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.40 to 1 when undrawn availability under the Amended Loan Agreement is less than 25%. As of December 31, 2025, the Company was in compliance with all applicable covenants under the Amended Loan Agreement. …”see in full comparison
“The Amended Loan Agreement contains customary conditions to borrowings, events of default and covenants, and also contains a financial covenant requiring us to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.40 to 1 when undrawn availability under the Amended Loan Agreement is less than 25%. As of December 31, 2024, the Company was in compliance with all applicable covenants under the Amended Loan Agreement. …”see in full comparison
“Non-GAAP earnings (loss) per share of Class A common stock—basic and diluted is a non-GAAP financial measure defined by us as earnings (loss) per share of Class A common stock—basic and diluted, adjusted to eliminate the impact of stock-based compensation and certain other items that are not related to our core operations, such as restructuring and other charges, transaction expense, non-operational media purchases, TRA remeasurement expense, income tax benefit resulting from the release of the valuation allowance and employee retention credit, as well as the income tax effect of these …”see in full comparison
“Non-GAAP earnings (loss) per share of Class A common stock—basic and diluted is a non-GAAP financial measure defined by us as earnings (loss) per share of Class A common stock—basic and diluted, adjusted to eliminate the impact of stock-based compensation and certain other items that are not related to our core operations, such as restructuring and other charges, transaction expense and non-operational media purchases, as well as the income tax effect of these adjustments. Earnings (loss) per share of Class A common stock—basic and diluted is the most comparable GAAP financial measure. …”see in full comparison
“Non-GAAP operating expenses is a non-GAAP financial measure. Total operating expenses is the most comparable GAAP financial measure. Non-GAAP operating expenses is defined by us as total operating expenses plus other expense (income), net, less TAC, stock-based compensation, depreciation, amortization and certain other items that are not related to our core operations, such as restructuring and other charges, transaction expense and non-operational media purchases. …”see in full comparison
“Non-GAAP operating expenses is a non-GAAP financial measure. Total operating expenses is the most comparable GAAP financial measure. Non-GAAP operating expenses is defined by us as total operating expenses plus other expense, net, less TAC, stock-based compensation, depreciation, amortization and certain other items that are not related to our core operations, such as restructuring and other charges, transaction expense and non-operational media purchases. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (206)
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Viant Technology Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Viant,” “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company”) should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included within this Annual Report on Form 10-K ("Annual Report"). In addition to historical financial information, the following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties which could cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties discussed under the headingheadings “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” and discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report. Additionally, our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any period in the future.
The following discusses our financial condition and results of operations for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 compared to our fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 as well as discussions of our financial condition and results of operations for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 compared to our fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.
The following discusses our financial condition and results of operations for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 compared to our fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 as well as discussions of our financial condition and results of operations for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 compared to our fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.
Our DSP is used by marketers and their advertising agencies to centralize the planning, buying and measurement of their digital advertising across most channels. Through our omni-channelomnichannel platform, a marketer can easily buy ads on connected TV ("CTV"), streaming audio, digital out-of-home, mobile and desktop.
Additionally, our artificial intelligence product suite, ViantAI, will be the foundational component of our long-term vision for autonomous advertising. We expect it to power every stage of the programmatic advertising lifecycle and create the most efficient and cost-effective experience for our customers. Our ViantAI suite currently includes AI Planning, which enables media planners to design high-impact campaigns in seconds, AI Bidding, which optimizes inventory costs by lowering the effective cost per mille ("eCPM") through automated bid adjustments, AI Measurement and Analysis, which provides accessible measurement and insights via a user-friendly chat interface, and recently released AI Decisioning, which automates planning, execution, measurement and dynamic optimization of campaigns in real-time. The launch of AI Decisioning was accompanied by the introduction of Outcomes, our autonomous advertising performance solution that utilizes each of the four phases of ViantAI, and various signals within our intelligence layer, to build and execute campaigns designed to deliver an optimal outcome.
Our DSP is an easy-to-use self-service platform that provides our customers with transparency and control over their advertising campaigns. Customers can choose to maintain hands-on control over every campaign detail or have our platform autonomously execute, optimize, and measure their advertising investments. Our platform offers customers unique visibility across a variety of inventory, allowing them to create customized audience segments and leverage our addressability solutions, Household ID ("HHID") and IRIS_ID, and strategic partner data to reach target audiences at scale. Our platform delivers a full suite of forecasting, reporting and built-in automation that provides our customers with insights into available inventory based on the desired target audience. We offer advanced forecasting and reporting that empowers our customers with functionality designed to ensure they can accurately measure and improve their return on advertising spend ("ROAS") across channels, a feature we believe helps us grow our customer base as more customers recognize its benefits.
These options consist of a percentage of spend pricing option and a fixed cost per mille (“CPM”) pricing option. Customers who prefer to use our platform on a self-service basis to execute their advertising campaigns enter into master service agreements (“MSAs”) with us, and we generate revenue under these arrangements by charging a platform fee that is primarily a percentage of spend. Customers who prefer to use our fixed CPM pricing option enter into insertion order (“IO”) arrangements with us, and we generate revenue by charging these customers a platform fee at a price for every 1,000 impressions an ad receives. We also offer additional service options to customers accessing our platform under an MSA or an IO, which enables them to use our services to aid them in data management, media execution and advanced reporting. When customers utilize these service options, we generate revenue by charging a service fee separate from the platform fee consisting of (1) a fee that represents a percentage of spend; (2) a flat monthly fee; or (3) a fixed CPM.fee.
•Net income (loss) of $12.5 million and $(9.9) million, representing an improvement of 225.2%;
•Non-GAAP netNet income(1) of $34.7$24.1 million and $21.7$12.5 million, representing an increase of 59.4%93.5%; and
•AdjustedNon-GAAP EBITDAnet income(1) of $44.4$41.1 million and $29.1$34.7 million, representing an increase of 52.7%.18.6%; and
•Adjusted EBITDA(1) of $57.4 million and $44.4 million, representing an increase of 29.2%.
(1)Contribution ex-TAC, non-GAAP net income and adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP financial measures. For a detailed discussion of our key operating and financial performance measures and a reconciliation of contribution ex-TAC, non- GAAPnon-GAAP net income and adjusted EBITDA to the most directly comparable financial measures calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("GAAP"), see “—Key Operating and Financial Performance Measures—Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”
Our future growth depends on our ability to enhance and improve our offerings and platform to increase ouradoption customers'and usage ofacross our platformcustomer andbase, addwhile newalso customers.supporting ongoing customer acquisition. We believe many advertisers are in the early stages of moving a greater percentage of their advertising budgets to programmatic channels. By providing solutions for the planning, buying and measuring of their media spend across most channels, we believe we are well positioned to capture more of our customers’ programmatic budgets. We also continue to add functionality to our platform to encourage our customers to increase their usage. For instance, we continue to leverage artificial intelligence and machine learning in our platform to help our customers improve the efficiency and effectiveness of their advertising campaigns. We expect ViantAI to acceleratecontinue accelerating market share gains and expandexpanding our total addressable market. Further, we intend to continue to grow our sales and marketing efforts to increase awareness of our DSP and highlight the advantages of our addressability solutions, HHID and IRIS_ID, supply quality scoring and strategic partner data as a superior option to cookie-based targeting.
We evaluate our customers' usage of our platform based on changes in revenue and assesscontribution ourex-TAC and we evaluate market penetration and scale based on changes in revenue, contribution ex-TAC and advertiser spend. We define advertiser spend as the total amount billed to our customers for activity on our platform inclusive of the costs of advertising media, third-party data, other add-on features and our platform fee that we charge customers. For the year ended December 31, 20242025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023,2024, our revenue grew 29.7%.19.0%. We believe growing customer adoption of our newer products and platform features continued to drive incremental revenue, gross profit and contribution ex-TAC during the year. For a detailed discussion of our key operating measures, see “—Key Operating and Financial Performance Measures—Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”
We believe that the advertising market is in the early stages of a shift toward programmatic advertising. We plan to invest for long-term growth. We anticipate that our operating expenses will continue to increase over the long-term as we invest in platform operations, technology and development to enhance our product capabilities including the integration of new advertising channels,capabilities, and in sales and marketing to acquire new customers and increase our customers’ usage of our platform. We believe that these investments will contribute to our long-term growth, although they may have a negative impact on our profitability in the near-term.growth.
Macroeconomic conditions and geopolitical events, such as pandemics, inflation, high interest rates, tariffs, international trade conflict, tightening of credit markets, recession risks, labor shortages, supply chain disruptions, political election cycles, changes in laws and interpretations of laws, changes in the volume and relative mix of U.S. government spending, cost-cutting and efficiency initiatives and potential disruptions from international conflicts and acts of terrorism, have impacted and may continue to impact our business and the business of our customers, while also disrupting sales channels and advertising and marketing activities. We continue to actively monitor the impact of these macroeconomic factors on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows, and on our clients,customers, partners, industry and employees. The extent to which these factors impact our operational and financial performance, including our ability to execute our business strategies and initiatives in the expected time frame, will depend on future developments, which are uncertain and cannot be predicted. Due to the nature of our business, the effect of these macroeconomic conditions and geopolitical events may not be fully reflected in our results of operations until future periods.
In the fourth quarter of 2022, we initiated a cost reduction plan aimed at reducing our operating expenses and sharpening our focus on key growth priorities in light of macroeconomic conditions. This included a reduction of our employee headcount by approximately 13% resulting in restructuring charges of $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, consisting primarily of cash severance payments, employee benefits and related costs.
We expect to continue to benefit from overall adoption of programmatic advertising by marketers and their agencies. We also expect to benefit from the broader industry shift of advertising budgets from linear television to CTV, which is significantly expanding the total addressable market for programmatic advertising. We believe we are well-positioned to capitalize on this shift and momentum as advertisers increasingly allocate budgets to CTV. Any material change in the growth rate of digital advertising or the rate of adoption of programmatic advertising, including expansion of new programmatic channels,advertising could affect our performance. Recent years have shown that advertising spend is closely tied to advertisers’ financial performance, and a downturn, either generally or in one or more of the industries in which our customers operate, could adversely impact the digital advertising market and our operating results.
We generate platform fees pursuant to MSAs, which allow customers to use our platform on a self-service basis in connection with our percentage of spend pricing option, and IOs, where we charge customers a platform fee at a price for every 1,000 impressions an ad receives in connection with the fixed CPM pricing option. We also generate service fees pursuant to MSAs and IOs for data management, media execution and advanced reporting service optionsservices that are available to customers under our percentage of spend and fixed CPM pricing options.
We recognize revenue when we transfer control of promised services directly to our customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for those services. For the percentage of spend pricing option, we recognize platform fees as revenue at the point in time when a purchase by the customer occurs through our platform. Revenue is generally reported net of amounts incurred and payable to suppliers for the cost of advertising media, third-party data and other add-on features (collectively, “traffic acquisition costs” or “TAC”) since we arrange for the transfer of TAC from the supplier to the customer through the use of our platform and do not control such features prior to transfer to the customer. In certain percentage of spend arrangements, revenue is reported on a gross basis because we control the advertising inventory before it is transferred to our customers.
Platform Operations. Platform operations expenseexpense, which represents our cost of revenues, whichprimarily consists of TAC, hosting costs, personnel costs, depreciation of capitalized software development costs related to our platform, customer support costs and allocated overhead. TAC recorded in platform operations consist of amounts incurred and payable to suppliers for costs associated with our fixed CPM pricing option and certain arrangements related to our percentage of spend pricing option. Personnel costs within platform operations include salaries, bonuses, stock-based compensation and employee benefit costs primarily attributable to personnel who directly support our platform.
Other than TAC, many of the costs included in platform operations expense do not increase or decrease proportionately with increases or decreases in our revenue. We expect platform operations expensesexpense to increase in future periods, primarily as a result of depreciation of capitalized software development costs, hosting costs and personnel costs as we continue to invest in the development of our platform to add new features and functions, increase the number of advertising media and data suppliers, rampscale upcustomer the volume of advertising spendactivity on our platform resulting in increased volumes of transactions, and hire additional personnel to support our customers.
Our sales and marketing organization focuses on marketing our platform to increase itscustomer adoption by existing and new customers.adoption. As a result, we expect sales and marketing expenses to increase in future periods as we increase our sales and marketing team and our focus on market development programs. Sales and marketing expense as a percentage of revenue may fluctuate from period to period based on revenue levels and the timing of our investments in our sales and marketing functions as these investments may vary in scope and scale over time.
Technology and Development. Technology and development expense consists primarily of personnel costs, including salaries, bonuses, stock-based compensation and employee benefit costs associated with the ongoing development and maintenance of our platformplatform, hosting costs and allocated overhead. Technology and development costs are expensed as incurred, except to the extent that such costs are associated with software development that qualifies for capitalization, which are then recorded as capitalized software included in "Property, equipment, and software, net", on the consolidated balance sheets. We record depreciation for capitalized software development costs not related to our platform within technology and development expense.
We believe that continued investment in our platform is critical to attaining our strategic objectives and long-term growth. We therefore expect technology and development expense to increase as we continue to invest in the development of our platform to support and maintain additional features and functions, increase the number of advertising media and data suppliers, and rampscale upcustomer the volume of advertising spendactivity on our platform.
Interest expense (income), net. Interest expense (income), net primarily consists of interest income on our cash and cash equivalents and interest expense on our long-term debt and revolving credit facility under the Amended Loan Agreement (as defined below) with PNC Bank.
TRA remeasurement expense. Tax Receivable Agreement ("TRA") remeasurement expense reflects the remeasurement of the TRA liability.
Employee retention credit. Employee retention credit represents proceeds from a government grant enacted under the CARES ("Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security") Act.
Revenue increased by $55.0 million, or 19%, during the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily due to a 36% increase in revenue from marketers in the healthcare, business services, retail, and consumer goods industry verticals and a net 14% increase in all other industry verticals excluding the political industry vertical, which decreased by 97% due to the prior year presidential election cycle.
Revenue increased by $25.8 million, or 13%, during the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase was primarily due to a 57% increase in revenue from marketers in the retail and public services industry verticals and a net 4% decrease in all other industry verticals.
Platform operations expense increased by $36.7$29.5 million, or 30%,19%, during the year ended December 31, 20242025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. This increase was primarily due to a $32.3$23.7 million increase in TAC, a variable function of revenue related to our fixed CPM pricing option and certain arrangements related to our percentage of spend pricing option. The increase was also due to higher other platform operations expense which was driven by a $2.8$1.8 million increase in stock-based compensation, a $1.7 million increase in personnel costs, a $1.1 million increase in cloud and data center services in support of our DSP, a $1.7$1.0 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense driven by our continued investment in developed technology,technology and a $1.3$0.9 million increase in platformdata-related costs in support of our DSP, partially offset by a $0.7 million decrease related to non-operational media purchases and a $0.8 million increase in personnel costs, partially offset by a $2.0 million decrease in stock-based compensation and a $0.2 million decrease in facilities expense.purchases.
Platform operations expense increased by $3.8$36.7 million, or 3%,30%, during the year ended December 31, 20232024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022.2023. This increase was driven by a $7.1$32.3 million increase in TAC, a variable function of revenue related to our fixed CPM pricing option and certain arrangements related to our percentage of spend pricing option. The increase was partiallyalso offsetdue byto a decrease inhigher other platform operations expense duewhich towas driven by a $2.0$2.8 million decreaseincrease in personnelcloud costs,and adata $1.1center million decrease in third-party costsservices in support of our DSP, a $0.7$1.7 million decreaseincrease in clouddepreciation driven by our continued investment in developed technology, a $1.3 million increase in platform costs duerelated to recognizednon-operational cloudmedia infrastructurepurchases efficiencies,and a $0.7$0.8 million increase in personnel costs, partially offset by a $2.0 million decrease in stock-based compensation and a $0.3$0.2 million decrease related to disposals in thefacilities prior period, partially offset by a $1.6 million increase in depreciation and amortization, net, related to our continued investment in developed technology.expense.
Sales and marketing expense increased by $11.1 million, or 21%, during the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily due to a $4.0 million increase in personnel costs, a $3.9 million increase in advertising expense, a $2.6 million increase in stock-based compensation, a $0.5 million increase in facilities expense, a $0.3 million increase in depreciation expense, a $0.2 million increase in technology costs and a $0.2 million increase in professional services expense, partially offset by a $0.6 million decrease in travel and entertainment.
Sales and marketing expense decreased by $13.3 million, or 21%, during the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. This decrease was due to an $8.8 million decrease in personnel costs and a $5.9 million decrease in advertising expense, partially offset by a $0.7 million increase in stock-based compensation and a $0.6 million increase in travel and entertainment expense.
Technology and development expense increased by $6.8 million, or 29%, during the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily due to a $2.8 million increase in personnel costs, a $1.4 million increase in depreciation expense, a $1.3 million increase in stock-based compensation, a $1.1 million increase in technology costs in support of our DSP and a $0.2 million increase in facilities expense.
Technology and development expense increased by $3.5 million, or 16%, during the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. This increase was due to a $2.8 million increase in personnel costs, a $0.5 million increase in facilities expense and a $0.4 million increase in stock-based compensation, partially offset by a $0.2 million decrease in cloud costs due to recognized cloud infrastructure efficiencies.
General and administrative expense decreased by $0.9 million, or 2%, during the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. This decrease was primarily due to a $1.9 million decrease in stock-based compensation, a $1.0 million decrease in accounting, legal, investor relations and consulting expenses associated with general corporate and compliance matters, a $0.8 million decrease in bad debt expense, a $0.5 million decrease in depreciation and amortization expense and a $0.4 million decrease in business insurance, partially offset by a $2.0 million increase in personnel costs and a $1.7 million increase in travel and entertainment expense driven by company events and employee-related expenses.
General and administrative expense increased by $0.9 million, or 2%, during the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. This increase was due to a $2.9 million increase in stock-based compensation and a $1.7 million increase in personnel costs, partially offset by a $1.9 million decrease in business insurance and tax, accounting, legal, and consulting expenses associated with general corporate and compliance matters, a $1.2 million decrease in bad debt reserves and a $0.7 million decrease in recruiting services.
Total other expense (income), net decreased by $11.2 million, or 121%, during the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. This decrease was primarily attributable to a TRA expense of $10.9 million related to the release of our valuation allowance and a $3.1 million decrease in interest income on cash and cash equivalents driven by lower interest rates and lower money market fund balances, partially offset by employee retention credit proceeds of $2.8 million from a government grant enacted under the CARES Act.
Total other income, net increased by $7.3 million, or 626%, during the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. This increase was primarily attributable to higher interest income on cash and cash equivalents driven by higher interest rates and lower interest expense as a result of paying off the full outstanding balance under our Amended Loan Agreement with PNC Bank.
DuringFor each of the years ended December 31, 2024,2025, 20232024 and 2022,2023, interest expense incurred was $0.4 million, $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively.million. Interest costs capitalized during the years ended December 31, 2024,2025, 20232024 and 20222023 were de minimis.
The U.S. federal statutory tax rate was 21% for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023.2024. The provisionbenefit forfrom income taxes increasedwas by $0.1$14.0 million, orresulting 65%,in an increase of $14.2 million, during the year ended December 31, 20242025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. This increasebenefit from income taxes was primarily due to statethe release of the valuation allowance and recognition of our deferred tax liabilities attributable to Viant Technology LLC.assets.
The U.S. federal statutory tax rate was 21% for the years ended December 31, 20232024 and 2022.2023. The provision for income taxes increased by $0.2$0.1 millionmillion, or 65%, during the year ended December 31, 20232024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022.2023. This increase was attributable to federal and state taxes resulting from Viant Technology Inc.'s pro-rata share of taxable income from Viant Technology LLC.
We monitor certain non-GAAP financial measures to help us evaluate growth trends, establish budgets, measure the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts and assess our operational efficiencies. We believe these measures enhance an understanding of our overall performance and investors’ ability to review our business from the same perspective as management and facilitate comparisons of this period’s results with prior periods on a consistent basis by excluding items that management does not believe are indicative of our ongoing operating performance. These non-GAAP financial measures include contribution ex-TAC, non-GAAP operating expenses, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of contribution ex-TAC, non-GAAP net income (loss), and non-GAAP earnings (loss) per share of Class A common stock—basic and diluted, each of which are discussed immediately following the table below. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable financial measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP are provided in the financial tables presented below.
There are limitations in using non-GAAP financial measures which are not prepared in accordance with GAAP, as they may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies and may exclude certain items that may have a material impact upon our reported financial results. The presentation of this additional information is not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the directly comparable financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. Some of these potential limitations include:
•other companies, including companies in our industry that have similar business arrangements, may report similarly titled measures, but calculate them differently, which reduces their usefulness as comparative measures;
•although depreciation and amortization are noncash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced in the future, and these non-GAAP financial measures do not reflect cash capital expenditure requirements for such replacements or for new capital expenditure requirements; and
•these non-GAAP financial measures do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs or the potentially dilutive impact of stock-based compensation.
Because of these and other potential limitations, you should consider our non-GAAP financial measures only as supplemental to other GAAP-based financial performance measures.
Non-GAAP operating expenses is a non-GAAP financial measure. Total operating expenses is the most comparable GAAP financial measure. Non-GAAP operating expenses is defined by us as total operating expenses plus other expense, net, less TAC, stock-based compensation, depreciation, amortization and certain other items that are not related to our core operations, such as restructuring and other charges, transaction expense and non-operational media purchases. Non-GAAP operating expenses is a key component in calculating adjusted EBITDA, which is one of the measures we use to provide our business outlook to the investment community. Additionally, non-GAAP operating expenses is used by our management and board of directors to understand and evaluate our operating performance and trends, to prepare and approve our annual budget and to develop short- and long-term operational plans. We believe that the elimination of TAC, stock-based compensation, depreciation, amortization and certain other items not related to our core operations provides another measure for period-to-period comparisons of our business, provides additional insight into our core controllable costs and is a useful metric for investors because it allows them to evaluate our operational performance in the same manner as our management and board of directors.
(1)Restructuring and other for the year ended December 31, 2025 includes severance and other charges incurred in connection with organizational restructuring initiatives and for the years ended December 31, 2024, and 2023 is related to aligning our workforce with our strategic performance goals.
(2)Transaction expense consists of costs incurred related to our contemplated and completed acquisitions for the year ended December 31, 2025 and costs incurred related to our completed acquisition as well as the filing of a "shelf" registration statement on Form S-3 for the year ended December 31, 2024.
(3)Non-operational media purchases reflects costs incurred for non-operating supplier purchases that are not billable to the customer for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure defined by us as net income (loss) before interest expense (income), net, income tax benefit (expense), depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation and certain other items that are not related to our core operations, such as restructuring and other charges, transaction expense, non-operational media purchases, TRA remeasurement expense, and employee retention credit. Net income (loss) is the most comparable GAAP financial measure. Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of contribution ex-TAC is a non-GAAP financial measure we calculate by dividing adjusted EBITDA by contribution ex-TAC for the period or periods presented. Net income (loss) as a percentage of gross profit is the most comparable GAAP financial measure.
Adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of contribution ex-TAC are used by our management and board of directors to understand and evaluate our core operating performance and trends, to prepare and approve our annual budget and to develop short- and long-term operational plans. In particular, we believe that the exclusion of the amounts eliminated in calculating adjusted EBITDA can provide a measure for period-to-period comparisons of our business. Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of contribution ex-TAC is used by our management and board of directors to evaluate adjusted EBITDA relative to our profitability after costs that are directly variable to revenues, which comprise TAC. Accordingly, we believe that adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of contribution ex-TAC provide information to investors and the market in understanding and evaluating our operating results in the same manner as our management and board of directors.
(1)Restructuring and other for the year ended December 31, 2025 includes severance and other charges incurred in connection with organizational restructuring initiatives and for the years ended December 31, 2024, and 2023 is related to aligning our workforce with our strategic performance goals.
(2)Transaction expense consists of costs incurred related to our contemplated and completed acquisitions for the year ended December 31, 2025 and costs incurred related to our completed acquisition as well as the filing of a "shelf" registration statement on Form S-3 for the year ended December 31, 2024.
(3)Non-operational media purchases reflects costs incurred for non-operating supplier purchases that are not billable to the customer for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
(4)TRA remeasurement expense reflects the remeasurement of the TRA liability for the year ended December 31, 2025.
(5)Employee retention credit represents proceeds from a government grant enacted under the CARES Act for the year ended December 31, 2025.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
Largest changes
In addition to our ViantAI product suite, we use AI Technologies licensed from third parties in our solutions and our operations and our ability to continue to use such technologies at the scale we need may be dependent on access to specific third-party software and infrastructure. We cannot control the availability or pricing of such third-party AI Technologies, especially in a highly competitive environment, and we may be unable to negotiate favorable economic terms with the applicable providers. If any such third-party AI Technologies become incompatible with our solutions or unavailable for use, or if the providers of such models unfavorably change the terms on which their AI Technologies are offered or terminate their relationship with us, our solutions may become less appealing to our customers, and our business will be harmed. In addition, to the extent any third party AI Technologies are used as a hosted service, any disruption, outage, or loss of information through such hosted services could disrupt our operations or solutions, damage our reputation, cause a loss of confidence in our solutions, or result in legal claims or proceedings, for which we may be unable to recover damages from the affected provider. In addition, the rapid adoption of generative AI and AI-powered search tools, including agentic AI systems, could reduce the volume of consumer traffic to the open web and other channels, which could in turn reduce the supply of programmatic advertising inventory available on our platform. If consumers increasingly obtain information and make purchasing decisions through AI-generated summaries or AI agents rather than by browsing publisher websites, advertising impressions available for programmatic purchase could decline, which could adversely affect our revenue and growth.see in full comparison
Tax laws applicable to our business activities are subject to interpretation. We are subject to audit by the IRS and by taxing authorities in the state and local jurisdictions in which we operate. Our tax obligations are based on how tax authorities in such jurisdictions assess revenue-based taxes such as sales and use taxes. Taxing authorities are and may continue to challenge our tax positions and methodologies including our positions regarding the collection of sales and use taxes and the jurisdictions in which we are subject to taxes, which could expose us to additional taxes and penalties. Defending against such audits can result in significant legal and administrative costs and divert management’s attention and resources. In addition, our future tax expense could increase as a result of changes in tax laws, regulations or accounting principles, or changes in the interpretation of the same, or as a result of earning income in jurisdictions that have higher tax rates. Further, several jurisdictions have proposed or enacted taxes applicable to digitalsee in full comparisonservices,serviceswhichandincludesoftware.businessForactivitiesexample, California enacted legislation in June 2026 that, effective January 1, 2027, extends the state's sales and use tax to prewritten software accessed remotely. This and similar developments in other jurisdictions could increase the cost of software and technology services we purchase, require us to collect additional taxes ondigitalcertainadvertisingofferings, andwhich mayincrease our overall tax obligationsin such jurisdictions. An increase in our tax expense and/or penalties could have a negative effect on our financial positionandresultscomplianceof operations. Moreover, the determination of our provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities requires significant estimates and judgment by management, and the tax treatment of certain transactions is uncertain. Although we believe we make reasonable estimates and judgments, the ultimate outcome of any particular issue may differ from the amounts previously recorded in our financial statements and any such occurrence could materially affect our financial position and results of operations.costs.
Lawmakers and regulators are also focused on data Processing by companies that do not have direct relationships with the consumers whose Personal Information they sell or share. Several states, including California,see in full comparisonOregonOregon, Texas, Connecticut, andTexas,New Jersey, have enacted or updated laws restricting the activities of data brokers.In late 2023, California passed the Delete Act, dramatically increasing obligations and potential penalties relative to the state’s preexisting data broker statute.Beyond additional transparency requirements, beginning in August 2026, companies registered as data brokers in California will be required to honor deletion requests expressed by California residents through a centralized mechanism the state will create.Beginning in 2028, data brokers will be required to undergo audits verifying their compliance with the Delete Act.These obligations may reduce the data available toViant, require us to develop complex and expensive compliance tools and procedures,Viant and may result in reductions in revenue.
Legislators, regulators, and other authorities have focused heavily on third-party data suppliers and the advertising industry in recent years, and we expect this to continue. Statesee in full comparisonPrivacyprivacyLawslaws and other U.S. and foreign laws governing Personal Information and privacy pose additional and material compliance risks to such suppliers and companies operating in the advertising industry. In addition, state lawmakers continue to update or enact new laws governing activities of data brokers. For example, states increasingly require companies like ours to honor requests to opt out of certain advertising related uses and disclosures of Personal Information through browser-or device-based mechanisms and California will soon require browsers to support such mechanisms, which may increase our compliance costs. Further, California will soon require data brokers to honor deletion requests made through a centralized mechanism,both ofwhichincrease our compliance costs, materially increase potential penalties for non-compliance, and potentiallymay limit the availability of data on our platform.ThisThese developments could impact our business and diminish our revenue.
“Inventory suppliers control the sales process for the inventory they supply, and their processes may not always work in our favor. For example, suppliers may place restrictions on the use of their inventory, including prohibiting the placement of advertisements on behalf of specific marketers, or seek to sell inventory directly to a marketer or advertising agency instead of, or in addition to, a demand side platform. …”see in full comparison
We must maintain a consistent supply of ad inventory. Our success depends on our ability to secure inventory on reasonable terms across a broad range of advertising inventory partners in various verticals and formats. The amount, quality and cost of inventory available to us can change at any time. If our relationships with any of our significant suppliers were to cease, or if the material terms of these relationships were to change unfavorably, our business would be negatively impacted. Our suppliers are generally not bound by long-term contracts. We may not have access to a consistent supply of inventory on favorable terms or at all. In addition, we compete with companies with which we have business relationships. For example, Google is an advertising inventory supplier in addition to being one of our competitors. If Google or any other company with attractive advertising inventory limits our access to its advertising inventory, our business could be adversely affected. If our relationships with certain of our suppliers were to cease, or if the material terms of these relationships were to change unfavorably, our business would be negatively impacted.see in full comparisonInventory suppliers control the sales process for the inventory they supply, and their processes may not always work in our favor. For example, suppliers may place restrictions on the use of their inventory, including prohibiting the placement of advertisements on behalf of specific marketers, or seek to sell inventory directly to a marketer or advertising agency instead of, or in addition to, a demand side platform. Furthermore, the inventory that we access through real-time advertising exchanges may be of low quality or misrepresented to us, despite attempts by us and our suppliers to prevent fraud and conduct quality assurance checks.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (26)
•Our acquisition of TVision Insights, Inc. ("TVision") expands our operations into the audience measurement spacespace, adding attention measurement and data capabilities that we are integrating into our platform and broader product offerings alongside our existing measurement, data, content and identity capabilities, and subjects us to additional risks, including risks relating to the integration of panel-based measurement technologies, the accuracy and reliability of measurement data, increased competition from established measurement providers, and intellectual property and other litigation;
Our industry is subject to rapid and frequent changes in technology, evolving customer needs and the frequent introduction by our competitors of new and enhanced offerings. We must regularly make investment decisions regarding offerings and technology to maintain the technological competitiveness of our products and services and meet customer demand and evolving industry standards.
Our industry is subject to rapid and frequent changes in technology, evolving customer needs and the frequent introduction by our competitors of new and enhanced offerings. We must regularly make investment decisions regarding offerings and technology to maintain the technological competitiveness of our products and services and meet customer demand and evolving industry standards. The complexity and uncertainty regarding the development of new technologies and the extent and timing of market acceptance of innovative products and services create difficulties in maintaining this competitiveness. The success of any enhancement or new solution depends on many factors, including timely completion, adequate quality testing, appropriate introduction and market acceptance. Without the timely introduction of new products, services and enhancements, including those leveraging AI and machine learning, our offerings could become technologically or commercially obsolete over time, in which case our revenue and operating results would suffer. In addition, such new products, services or enhancements may create new, or exacerbate existing, technological, security, legal and other challenges, could cause unintended consequences, and may not perform as intended. If new or existing competitors replicate our offerings or have more attractive offerings, we may lose customers or customers may decrease their use of our platform. New customer demands, superior competitive offerings or new industry standards could require us to make unanticipated and costly changes to our platform or business model. In addition, as we develop and introduce new products and services, including those incorporating or utilizing AI and machine learning and new processing of information, they may raise new, or heighten existing, technological, security, legal and other risks and challenges, that may cause unintended consequences and may not function properly or may be misused by our customers.
We derive revenue from the programmatic purchase of advertising on our platform.platform and related data, measurement and other technology-enabled offerings. We expect that programmatic ad buying will continue to be our primary source of revenue for the foreseeable future, and that our revenue growth will largely depend on increasing our customers’ usage of our platform. While the market for programmatic ad buying for desktop and mobile ads is relatively established, the market in other channels is still emerging, and our current and potential customers may not shift quickly enough to programmatic ad buying from other buying methods, which could reduce our growth potential. If the market for programmatic ad buying deteriorates or develops more slowly than we expect, it could reduce demand for our platform, and our business, growth prospects and financial condition would be adversely affected.
We must maintain a consistent supply of ad inventory. Our success depends on our ability to secure inventory on reasonable terms across a broad range of advertising inventory partners in various verticals and formats. The amount, quality and cost of inventory available to us can change at any time. If our relationships with any of our significant suppliers were to cease, or if the material terms of these relationships were to change unfavorably, our business would be negatively impacted. Our suppliers are generally not bound by long-term contracts. We may not have access to a consistent supply of inventory on favorable terms or at all. In addition, we compete with companies with which we have business relationships. For example, Google is an advertising inventory supplier in addition to being one of our competitors. If Google or any other company with attractive advertising inventory limits our access to its advertising inventory, our business could be adversely affected. If our relationships with certain of our suppliers were to cease, or if the material terms of these relationships were to change unfavorably, our business would be negatively impacted. Inventory suppliers control the sales process for the inventory they supply, and their processes may not always work in our favor. For example, suppliers may place restrictions on the use of their inventory, including prohibiting the placement of advertisements on behalf of specific marketers, or seek to sell inventory directly to a marketer or advertising agency instead of, or in addition to, a demand side platform. Furthermore, the inventory that we access through real-time advertising exchanges may be of low quality or misrepresented to us, despite attempts by us and our suppliers to prevent fraud and conduct quality assurance checks.
Inventory suppliers control the sales process for the inventory they supply, and their processes may not always work in our favor. For example, suppliers may place restrictions on the use of their inventory, including prohibiting the placement of advertisements on behalf of specific marketers, or seek to sell inventory directly to a marketer or advertising agency instead of, or in addition to, a demand side platform. Furthermore, the inventory that we access through real-time advertising exchanges may be of low quality or misrepresented to us, despite attempts by us and our suppliers to prevent fraud and conduct quality assurance checks.
Legislators, regulators, and other authorities have focused heavily on third-party data suppliers and the advertising industry in recent years, and we expect this to continue. State Privacyprivacy Lawslaws and other U.S. and foreign laws governing Personal Information and privacy pose additional and material compliance risks to such suppliers and companies operating in the advertising industry. In addition, state lawmakers continue to update or enact new laws governing activities of data brokers. For example, states increasingly require companies like ours to honor requests to opt out of certain advertising related uses and disclosures of Personal Information through browser-or device-based mechanisms and California will soon require browsers to support such mechanisms, which may increase our compliance costs. Further, California will soon require data brokers to honor deletion requests made through a centralized mechanism, both of which increase our compliance costs, materially increase potential penalties for non-compliance, and potentiallymay limit the availability of data on our platform. ThisThese developments could impact our business and diminish our revenue.
Furthermore, digital advertising and in-app advertising are largely dependent on established technology companies and their operation of the most commonly used internet browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer and Safari), devices, operating systems (such as Android and iOS) and applications. These companies may change the operations or policies of their browsers, devices and operating systems in a manner that fundamentally changes our ability to operate our platform or use or collect data. Users of these browsers, devices or operating systems may also adjust their behaviors and use of technology in ways that change our ability to collect data. Digital advertising and in-app advertising are also dependent, in part, on internet protocols and the practices of internet service providers, including IP address allocation. Changes that these providers make to their practices, or adoption of new internet protocols, may materially limit or alter the availability of data. For example, Apple introduced an iOS update in April 2021 that only allows tracking of user activity after an opt-in by users, and in October 2021, Google introduced similar changes that provided users with the ability to opt-out of tracking across devices using the Android operating system. Individuals may increasingly resist or turn off the collection, use, and sharing of Personal Information to deliver targeted advertising. Individuals are increasingly becoming aware of options related to consent, browser-based signals including the “Global Privacy Control,” a browser setting that notifies websites of a user's privacy preferences, and other “ad-blocking” software, any of which could materially impact our and our data supplier’s ability to collect, use and disclose Personal Information. Individuals also use controls available to them through their mobile devices to turn off “tracking” and the delivery of personalized ads through mobile apps. A limitation or alteration of the availability of data in any of these or other instances may have a material impact on the advertising technology industry, which could decrease advertising budgets and subsequently reduce our revenue and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. Please see “—Risks Related to Data Privacy and Artificial Intelligence” for additional discussion of the laws and regulations governing the collection of data to which we are or may become subject and about the risks to our business associated with such laws and regulations.
We had approximately 408470 employees as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026. We believe our corporate culture has been critical to our success and we have invested substantial time and resources in building our team within our company culture. However, it may be difficult to maintain our culture, whether as a result of corporate growth or reduction in force, which could reduce our ability to innovate and operate effectively and proactively focus on and pursue our corporate objectives. The failure to maintain the key aspects of our culture could result in decreased employee satisfaction, increased difficulty in attracting top talent, increased turnover and degraded quality of customer service, all of which are important to our success and to the effective execution of our business strategy. In the event we are unable to maintain our corporate culture, our business, operating results and financial condition could be harmed.
We have acquired businesses and technologies to enhance our capabilities and grow our business, including our acquisition of TVision, which closed on May 1, 2026. The TVision acquisition expands our operations into the audience measurement space, anadding areaattention inmeasurement whichand data capabilities that we haveare notintegrating historicallyinto competed,our platform and broader product offerings alongside our existing measurement, data, content and identity capabilities, and subjects us to additional risks, including risks relating to the integration of panel-based measurement technologies, the accuracy and reliability of measurement data, increased competition from established measurement providers, and intellectual property and other litigation. To the extent we find suitable and attractive acquisition candidates and business opportunities in the future, we may continue to acquire other complementary businesses, products and technologies and enter into joint ventures or similar strategic relationships. If we identify an appropriate acquisition candidate, we may not be successful in negotiating the terms or financing of the acquisition, and our due diligence may fail to identify all of the problems, liabilities or other shortcomings or challenges of an acquired business, product or technology, including issues related to intellectual property, product quality or architecture, regulatory compliance practices, revenue recognition or other accounting practices, tax liabilities, actual or threatened litigation, privacy or cybersecurity issues or employee or customer issues. Future or past business transactions (such as acquisitions or integrations) could expose us to additional cybersecurity risks and vulnerabilities, as our systems could be negatively affected by vulnerabilities present in acquired or integrated entities’ systems and technologies. We may not be able to successfully integrate the services, products and personnel of any acquired business into our operations. In addition, any future acquisitions, joint ventures or similar relationships may cause a disruption in our ongoing business and distract our management. Further, we may be unable to realize the revenue improvements, cost savings and other intended benefits of any such transaction. Acquisitions involve numerous other risks, any of which could harm our business, including:
We rely on proprietary computer vision, sensor technology, and other technologies installed in panelist households to gather television, digital, and audience measurement data to track viewing attention, engagement, and co-viewing behavior from households. It may be increasingly difficult and costly to recruit households willing to permit the installation of cameras and sensors in their living spaces. Shifts in consumer sentiment around data collection, opt-in monitoring, and in-home technology, as well as heightened consumer awareness of and sensitivity to privacy, could result in greater reluctance to participate in our panels and difficulty retaining a representative panel, which could impair our ability to maintain adequate sample sizes and demographic representation. In addition, aspects of our computer vision technology that perform facial recognition may be subject to biometric privacy laws, as well as other state and local laws regulating the collection and use of biometric identifiers.identifiers and other personal information. Changes in or expanded enforcement of such laws could increase compliance costs, limit our ability to collect certain data, or expose us to litigation risk. As a result, ensuring that our recruited panel mirrors the behaviors and characteristics of the broader U.S. viewing population, and covers the range of demographic segments requested by our customers, presents an ongoing challenge. Additionally, as viewing habits fragment across television, connected TV, and streaming platforms, maintaining a panel that adequately captures the full spectrum of consumption behavior becomes more complex.
We also compete with large privately-held companies such as Yahoo DSP, with public companies exclusively serving our industry such as The Trade Desk, and with divisions of large, well-established public companies such as Google and Amazon. Our current and potential competitors may have significantly more financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we have, allowing them to devote greater resources to the development, promotion, sale and support of their products and services. They may also have more extensive customer bases and broader supplier relationships than we have and operate internationally. As a result, these competitors may be better able to respond quickly to new technologies, develop deeper marketer relationships, offer services at lower prices, or offer a global range of services and inventory. Increased competition may result in reduced pricing for our platform, increased sales and marketing expense, longer sales cycles or a decrease of our market share, any of which could negatively affect our revenue and future operating results and our ability to grow our business. These companies may also have greater brand recognition and longer histories than we have and may actively seek to serve our market and have the power to significantly change the nature of the marketplace to their advantage. Some of our larger competitors, particularly those that are divisions of large companies, have substantially broader product offerings and may leverage their relationships based on other products or incorporate functionality into existing products to gain business in a manner that may discourage customers from using our platform, including through selling at zero or negative margins or product bundling with other services they provide at reduced prices. Customers may prefer to purchase advertising from social medialmedia platforms or other closed platforms, which they cannot acquire through our platform. Potential customers may also prefer to purchase from their existing platform rather than a new platform regardless of product performance or features. These larger competitors often have broader product lines and market focus and may therefore not be as susceptible to downturns in a particular market. We may also experience negative market perception as a result of being a smaller company than our larger competitors.
In the United States, an ever-increasing number of laws and regulations apply to the Processing of Personal Information. In recent years, the U.S. federal and state legislatures, along with regulatory authorities at the state and federal level, have increased their focus on the collection and use of Personal Information, including relating to “interest-based,” “cross-context behavioral,” or “targeted” advertising. For example, the FTC has been very active in bringing enforcement actions against companies that handle personalPersonal dataInformation it views as sensitive for advertising purposes, including location data brokers and companies that process health-related data. These enforcement actions may signal increased ongoing regulatory scrutiny of advertising practices, particularly those that involve “sensitive” categories of personal data such as health data, data related to children and teens, and precise location information. The FTC could expand this focus by acting on new authority to enforce a federal law focused on disclosures of certain information it classifies as sensitive to certain restricted countries or entities under the control of such countries.
State legislatures have also continued their focus in this area. For example, thestate Stateprivacy Privacy Lawslaws require covered businesses to, among other things, provide disclosures to consumers and grant consumers a right to opt-out of use and disclosure of their Personal Information for purposes of showing targeted advertisements and “sales” of Personal Information, a concept that is broadly defined as the disclosure of Personal Information to a third party for monetary or other valuable consideration. Certain Statestate Privacyprivacy Lawslaws also require or will require companies to respond to user-enabled opt out preference signals or "global privacy controls," such as those expressed through a browser plug-in or privacy setting, device setting, or other mechanisms, that communicate or signal the consumer’s choice to opt-out of the sale or sharing of their Personal Information, or the use of their Personal Information for targeted advertising. Laws additionally require covered businesses to take extra precautions for data deemed “sensitive” and offer consumers rights to access, delete, and correct their Personal Information. These laws are generally enforced by each state’s attorney general with potentially steep penalties for violations.
Lawmakers and regulators are also focused on data Processing by companies that do not have direct relationships with the consumers whose Personal Information they sell or share. Several states, including California, OregonOregon, Texas, Connecticut, and Texas,New Jersey, have enacted or updated laws restricting the activities of data brokers. In late 2023, California passed the Delete Act, dramatically increasing obligations and potential penalties relative to the state’s preexisting data broker statute. Beyond additional transparency requirements, beginning in August 2026, companies registered as data brokers in California will be required to honor deletion requests expressed by California residents through a centralized mechanism the state will create. Beginning in 2028, data brokers will be required to undergo audits verifying their compliance with the Delete Act. These obligations may reduce the data available to Viant, require us to develop complex and expensive compliance tools and procedures,Viant and may result in reductions in revenue.
Related to health information, the Washington state My Health My Data Act ("MHMD") introduced a host of new requirements covering a very broadly defined notion of consumer health data, including obligations on disclosures of such data that will impact the advertising industry. MHMD is subject to a private right of action, and plaintiffs’ attorneys could explore claims testing the bounds of the law’s text. Other states (e.g., Nevada) have enacted similar laws (though without a private right of action), and we expect more states will follow.
For example, in recent years browser providers have enacted and may continue to enact changes restricting the use of third-party cookies in their browsers, which may cause instability in the digital advertising market. Execution and measurement in digital advertising relies to a significant extent on the use of cookies, pixels and other similar technology, including mobile device identifiers that are provided by mobile operating systems for advertising purposes, to collect data about users and devices (collectively referred to as "cookies"). Although we believe our business is less reliant on cookies than some of our competitors because we do not need cookies for marketers and their advertising agencies to identify consumers with our identity resolution capabilities and identity graph, we do use third-party cookies in connection with obtaining information about consumers, and for delivering digital advertising. Today, Apple's Safari, Mozilla's Firefox and Microsoft's Edge already block third-party cookies by default. Google's web browser, Chrome, offers controls over third-party cookies and, while it no longer plans to deprecate support for third-party cookies and user agent string entirely, Google has committed to enhancing its “Privacy Sandbox” label, which may result in modified targeting and measurement functionality to digital advertising ecosystem participants, and the introduction ofintroduce new browser-level controls on Chrome, which will allow users to make an informed choice regarding cookies that will apply across their web browsing. We believe thatChrome. Google’s ongoing development of these technologies, which we expect to be technically complex and designed in a manner that doesmay not favor us or our partners, has created and will likely continue to create industry uncertainty regarding the potential effects on user experience and advertiser targeting and measurement. Although we believe our platform is well-positioned to adapt to such changes, particularly with our HHID and IRIS_ID, the impact of such changes remains uncertain and could be more disruptive than we anticipate, including to the display advertising ecosystem in particular, where such changes could adversely impact our growth in that channel. Google has also introduced ad blocking software in its Chrome web browser that will block certain ads based on quality standards established under a multi-stakeholder coalition. Other browsers have added similar controls. These actions will have significant impacts on the digital advertising and marketing ecosystems in which we operate, which could cause changes in advertising budget allocations and thereby could negatively impact our business. In addition, these browser and platform providers may frequently delay or change their previously announced operations or policies.
In addition to our ViantAI product suite, we use AI Technologies licensed from third parties in our solutions and our operations and our ability to continue to use such technologies at the scale we need may be dependent on access to specific third-party software and infrastructure. We cannot control the availability or pricing of such third-party AI Technologies, especially in a highly competitive environment, and we may be unable to negotiate favorable economic terms with the applicable providers. If any such third-party AI Technologies become incompatible with our solutions or unavailable for use, or if the providers of such models unfavorably change the terms on which their AI Technologies are offered or terminate their relationship with us, our solutions may become less appealing to our customers, and our business will be harmed. In addition, to the extent any third party AI Technologies are used as a hosted service, any disruption, outage, or loss of information through such hosted services could disrupt our operations or solutions, damage our reputation, cause a loss of confidence in our solutions, or result in legal claims or proceedings, for which we may be unable to recover damages from the affected provider. In addition, the rapid adoption of generative AI and AI-powered search tools, including agentic AI systems, could reduce the volume of consumer traffic to the open web and other channels, which could in turn reduce the supply of programmatic advertising inventory available on our platform. If consumers increasingly obtain information and make purchasing decisions through AI-generated summaries or AI agents rather than by browsing publisher websites, advertising impressions available for programmatic purchase could decline, which could adversely affect our revenue and growth.
In connection with our acquisition of TVision, we assumed certain pending litigation with The Nielsen Company (US), LLC ("Nielsen"). Nielsen has filed multiple patent infringement actions against TVision since 2021. TwoIn casesJune remain active: (i)2026, a jury returned a unanimous verdict in our favor in the 2022 action (Case No. 1:22-cv-00057, D. Del.), allegingfinding infringementthat ofwe adid not infringe the asserted patent relating to Automatic Content Recognition technology used in our measurement services,services. forOne whichcase aremains jury trial is scheduled for June 2026, and (ii)active: a 2025 action (Case No. 1:25-cv-00575, D. Del.) alleging infringement of an additional Nielsen patent. In November 2025, TVision filed antitrust counterclaims in the 2025 action alleging that Nielsen has used anticompetitive practices, including serial patent litigation, exclusionary contract terms, and monopoly power in the TV audience measurement market, to suppress competition in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
While we believe the pending patent claims against us lack merit and that our antitrust counterclaims are well-founded, patent and antitrust litigation is inherently uncertain, complex, and costly. Nielsen may appeal the June 2026 verdict, and we cannot assure you that such appeal would not be successful. In addition, we cannot assure you that our antitrust counterclaims will result in a favorable outcome or any monetary recovery.
We are a holding company, and our only business is to act as the managing member of Viant Technology LLC, and our only material assets are Class A units representing approximately 28.6%31.7% of the membership interests of Viant Technology LLC as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026. We do not have any independent means of generating revenue or cash flow, and our ability to pay dividends in the future, if any, will depend upon the financial results and cash flows of Viant Technology LLC.
The actual increase in tax basis, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, will vary depending on a number of factors, including the price of our Class A common stock at the time of the exchange; the timing of future exchanges; the extent to which exchanges are taxable; the amount and timing of the utilization of tax attributes; the amount, timing and character of our income; the U.S. federal, state and local tax rates then applicable; the amount of each exchanging unitholder’s tax basis in its units at the time of the relevant exchange; the depreciation and amortization periods that apply to the increases in tax basis; the timing and amount of any earlier payments that we may have made under the Tax Receivable Agreement and the portion of our payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement that constitute imputed interest or give rise to depreciable or amortizable tax basis. The increases in the tax basis of the intangible assets of Viant Technology LLC as a result of the exchanges of Viant Technology LLC units and certain other tax benefits will be subject to the TRA. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we concluded that it was more likely than not that our deferred tax assets subject to the Tax Receivable Agreement will be realized. Therefore, we recorded a liability related to the tax savings we may realize from utilization of such deferred tax assets. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the total TRA liability is approximately $12.5$12.9 million. If utilization of the deferred tax asset subject to the TRA becomes not more likely than not in the future, we may reverse the liability related to the TRA. Upon recognition of the TRA, there may be a material negative effect on our financial condition and liquidity if, as described below, the payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement exceed the actual benefits we receive in respect of the tax attributes subject to the Tax Receivable Agreement and/or distributions to us by Viant Technology LLC are not sufficient to permit us to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement.
Tax laws applicable to our business activities are subject to interpretation. We are subject to audit by the IRS and by taxing authorities in the state and local jurisdictions in which we operate. Our tax obligations are based on how tax authorities in such jurisdictions assess revenue-based taxes such as sales and use taxes. Taxing authorities are and may continue to challenge our tax positions and methodologies including our positions regarding the collection of sales and use taxes and the jurisdictions in which we are subject to taxes, which could expose us to additional taxes and penalties. Defending against such audits can result in significant legal and administrative costs and divert management’s attention and resources. In addition, our future tax expense could increase as a result of changes in tax laws, regulations or accounting principles, or changes in the interpretation of the same, or as a result of earning income in jurisdictions that have higher tax rates. Further, several jurisdictions have proposed or enacted taxes applicable to digital services,services whichand includesoftware. businessFor activitiesexample, California enacted legislation in June 2026 that, effective January 1, 2027, extends the state's sales and use tax to prewritten software accessed remotely. This and similar developments in other jurisdictions could increase the cost of software and technology services we purchase, require us to collect additional taxes on digitalcertain advertisingofferings, and which may increase our overall tax obligations in such jurisdictions. An increase in our tax expense and/or penalties could have a negative effect on our financial position and resultscompliance of operations. Moreover, the determination of our provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities requires significant estimates and judgment by management, and the tax treatment of certain transactions is uncertain. Although we believe we make reasonable estimates and judgments, the ultimate outcome of any particular issue may differ from the amounts previously recorded in our financial statements and any such occurrence could materially affect our financial position and results of operations.costs.
Moreover, the determination of our provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities requires significant estimates and judgment by management, and the tax treatment of certain transactions is uncertain. Although we believe we make reasonable estimates and judgments, the ultimate outcome of any particular issue may differ from the amounts previously recorded in our financial statements and any such occurrence could materially affect our financial position and results of operations.
Our quarterly and annual operating results have fluctuated in the past and we expect our future operating results to fluctuate due to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. In particular, we offer our customers a choice of two different pricing options: a percentage of spend option and a fixed CPM pricing option. We also offer our customers the ability to use our services to aid them in data management, media execution and advanced reporting. Our revenue and contribution ex-TAC vary across these different pricing and service options, and therefore our results may vary based on the mix of pricing and service options chosen by customers in any given period. Contribution ex-TAC is a non-GAAP financial measure. For a detailed discussion of our key operating and financial performance measures and a reconciliation of contribution ex-TAC to the most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationOperations—Key Operating and Financial Performance Measures—Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures.” The varying nature of our pricing mix between periods may make it more difficult for us to forecast our future operating results. Further, variation in our pricing mix may make it more difficult to make comparisons between prior, current and future periods. Period-to-period comparisons of our operating results should not be relied upon as an indication of our future performance. Fluctuations in our operating results could cause our performance to fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors and adversely affect the price of our Class A common stock. Because our business is changing and evolving rapidly, and the macroeconomic and geopolitical environment continues to evolve as a result of pandemics, bank failures, labor shortages, supply chain disruptions, tariffs, inflation and monetary supply shifts, high interest rates, tightening of credit markets, political cycles, changes in laws and interpretations of laws, changes in the volume and relative mix of U.S. government spending, cost-cutting and efficiency initiatives and potential disruptions from international conflicts and acts of terrorism, our historical operating results may not be necessarily indicative of our future operating results. In addition to changes in terms of mix of our different pricing options, factors that may cause our operating results to fluctuate include the following:
Through their ownership of common stock, the Vanderhook Parties control approximately 68%65% of the voting power of our common stock in the election of directors as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026. This control limits or precludes your ability to influence corporate matters. These stockholders will be able to influence or control matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors and the approval of mergers, acquisitions or other extraordinary transactions. Their interests may differ from yours and they may vote in a manner that is adverse to your interests. This control may deter, delay or prevent a change of control of our company, deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their Class A common stock as part of a sale of our company and may ultimately affect the market price of our Class A common stock.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”
New heading “Operating Expenses”
New heading “Platform Operations”
New heading “Sales and Marketing”
New heading “Technology and Development”
New heading “General and Administrative”
New heading “Total Other Expense (Income), Net”
New heading “Provision For (Benefit From) Income Taxes”
Largest changes
“In connection with the TVision acquisition, we made estimates regarding the fair values and useful lives of acquired intangible assets, including developed technology, trademarks and tradenames, customer relationships and panelist relationships, as well as deferred tax assets and goodwill. These estimates involved assumptions regarding future cash flows and revenue growth rates, useful lives, customer and panelist relationships, discount rates, royalty rates, and other factors. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (83)
We are an advertising technology company. Our cloud-based demand side platform (“DSP”) enables the programmatic purchase of advertising, which is the electronification of the digital advertising buying process. Our proprietary data, measurement, AI and other technology-enabled solutions enhance advertising planning, execution and performance. Programmatic advertising is rapidly taking market share from traditional ad sales channels, which require more staffing, offer less transparency and involve higher costs to buyers.
Our DSP is an easy-to-use self-service platform that provides our customers with transparency and control over their advertising campaigns. Customers can choose to maintain hands-on control over every campaign detail or have our platform autonomously execute, optimize,optimize and measure their advertising investments. Our platform offers customers unique visibility across a variety of inventory, allowing them to create customized audience segments and leverage our proprietary data and addressability solutions, including Household ID ("HHID") and, IRIS_ID, and attention signals, as well as strategic partner datadata, to reach target audiences at scale. Our platform delivers a full suite of forecasting, reporting and built-in automation that provides our customers with insights into available inventory based on the desired target audience. We offer advanced forecasting and reporting that empowers our customers with functionality designed to ensure they can accurately measure and improve their return on advertising spend across channels, a feature we believe helps us grow our customer base as more customers recognize its benefits.
We generate revenue by chargingfrom platform fees and fees related to the purchase of our proprietary data, measurement, and technology service feesofferings pursuant to agreements that enable a wide variety of marketers and their agencies to select the mix of pricing and service options that suits their unique business and advertising budget.needs.
TheseOur platform pricing options consist of a percentage of spend pricing option and a fixed cost per mille (“CPM”) pricing option. Customers who prefer to use our platform on a self-service basis to execute their advertising campaigns enter into master service agreements (“MSAs”) with us, and we generate revenue under these arrangements by charging a platform fee that is primarily a percentage of spend. Customers who prefer to use our fixed CPM pricing option enter into insertion order (“IO”) arrangements with us, and we generate revenue by charging these customers a platform fee at a price for every 1,000 impressions an ad receives. We also offer additional service options to customers accessing our platform under an MSA or an IO, which enables them to use our services to aid them in data management, media execution and advanced reporting. When customers utilize these service options, we generate revenue by charging a service fee separate from the platform fee.
We believe that offering a mix of pricing and service options provides greater flexibility and access to our platform for marketers and their advertising agencies seeking to plan, buy and measure programmatic campaigns.campaigns using our platform and related data, measurement and technology-enabled solutions.
Our financial results for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, include:
•Net loss of $2.2 million and $3.3 million, representing an improvement of 34%;
•Non-GAAP netNet income (1loss) of $5.6$(1.8) million and $2.8$1.8 million, representing ana increasedecrease of 99%203%; and
•AdjustedNon-GAAP EBITDAnet income(1) of $9.8$9.9 million and $5.4$8.0 million, representing an increase of 81%.23%; and
•Adjusted EBITDA(1) of $14.2 million and $11.3 million, representing an increase of 26%.
Our financial results for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, include:
•Revenue of $192.8 million and $148.5 million, representing an increase of 30%;
•Gross profit of $81.9 million and $66.4 million, representing an increase of 23%;
•Contribution ex-TAC(1) of $110.5 million and $91.1 million, representing an increase of 21%;
•Net loss of $(4.0) million and $(1.5) million, representing an increase of 165%;
•Non-GAAP net income(1) of $15.5 million and $10.8 million, representing an increase of 44%; and
•Adjusted EBITDA(1) of $24.0 million and $16.7 million, representing an increase of 44%.
Our future growth depends on our ability to enhance and improve our offerings and platform to increase adoption and usage across our customer base, while also supporting ongoing customer acquisition. We believe many advertisers are in the early stages of moving a greater percentage of their advertising budgets to programmatic channels. By providing solutions for the planning, buying and measuring of their media spend across most channels, we believe we are well-positioned to capture more of our customers’ programmatic budgets. We also continue to add functionality to our platform to encourage our customers to increase their usage. For instance, we continue to leverage artificial intelligence and machine learning in our platform to help our customers improve the efficiency and effectiveness of their advertising campaigns. We believe ViantAI will support continued market share gains and contribute to the expansion of our total addressable market. Further, we intend to continue to grow our sales and marketing efforts to increase awareness of our DSP and highlight the advantages of our exclusive data, consisting of three primary pillars of proprietary insightdata. intoOn content,May identity1, and2026, nowwe attention withcompleted our recent acquisition of TVision.TVision, adding attention measurement and data capabilities that we are integrating into our platform and broader product offerings alongside our existing measurement, data, content and identity capabilities. We believe these combined capabilities will enhance our measurement and optimization solutions and, over time, support increased adoption and usage of our platform.
We have also experienced strengthening advertiser demand, reflected in broad-based activity across customeradvertiser industry verticals, continued demand for CTV, increased utilization of our proprietary data and expanded use of the ViantAI product suite. We also continue to see engagement across our sales pipeline, including with enterprise brands, which we believe reflects advertiser interest in differentiated, independent and transparent buy-side alternatives. While the impact of these trends havehas varied and may continue to fluctuate periodfrom to period,period-to-period, we believe they reflect ongoing interest in our platform and solutions, including our proprietary data and our CTV and AI-driven offerings.
We evaluate our customers'financial usage of our platformperformance based on changes in revenue and contribution ex-TACex-TAC. andSeparately, we evaluate market penetration based onuse changes in advertiser spend.spend as a qualitative indicator of our platform's market penetration. We define advertiser spend as the total amount billed to our customers for activity on our platform inclusive of the costs of advertising media, third-party data, other add-on features such as our proprietary data, measurement, and technology-enabled solutions, and our platform fee that we charge customers. For the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, our revenue grew 25%.30%. We believe growing customer adoption of our newer products and platform features continued to drive incremental revenue, gross profit and contribution ex-TAC during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026. For a detailed discussion of our key operating measures, see “—Key Operating and Financial Performance Measures—Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”
We believe that the advertising market is in the early stages of a shift toward programmatic advertising. We plan to invest for long-term growth. We anticipate that our operating expenses will continue to increase over the long-term as we invest in platform operations, technology and development to enhance our product capabilities and in sales and marketing to acquire new customers and increase our customers’ usage of our platform.platform and related offerings. We believe that these investments will contribute to our long-term growth.
The following tables present our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations, our condensed consolidated statements of operations as a percentage of revenue, and the impact of stock-based compensation, depreciation and amortization on each operating expense line item for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025:
Comparison of the Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025
Revenue increased by $17.9$26.4 million, or 25%,34%, during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The increase was primarily due to a 79%67% increase in revenue from marketers in the financialhealthcare, public services, healthcare, consumer goods, and industrialtravel industry verticalsverticals, and,while onrevenue aattributable cumulativeto basis, relatively flat performancemarketers across our remaining industry verticals.verticals increased 19%.
Platform operations expense increased by $12.1$16.7 million, or 30%,40%, during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $10.3$14.6 million increase in TAC, a variable function of revenue related to our fixed CPM pricing option and certain arrangements related to our percentage of spend pricing option. The increase was also due to higher other platform operations expense which was driven by a $1.2$1.1 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense driven by our continued investment in developed technology, a $0.4$0.5 million increase in personnel costs, a $0.2$0.4 million increase in technology costs and a $0.1 million increase in cloud and data center services and a $0.2 million increase in data-related costs,services, both in support of our DSP, partially offset by a $0.2 million decrease in stock-based compensation.DSP.
Sales and marketing expense increased by $2.0$5.0 million, or 14%,32%, during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $1.1$2.1 million increase in personnel costs, a $0.9$1.5 million increase in stock-based compensation, a $0.2$0.7 million increase in travel and entertainment, a $0.6 million increase in advertising expense and a $0.1 million increase in facilities expense, partially offset by a $0.3 million decrease in advertisingdepreciation expense.
Technology and development expense increased by $0.2$3.1 million, or 3%,41%, during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $0.2$1.4 million increase in stock-based compensation andcompensation, a $0.1$1.2 million increase in personnel costs, a $0.6 million increase in technology costs in support of our DSP,DSP and a $0.1 million increase in facilities expense, partially offset by a $0.1$0.2 million decrease in depreciation expense.
General and administrative expense increased by $2.6$5.4 million, or 18%,42%, during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $2.0 million increase in personnel costs and a $1.3$2.2 million increase in accounting, legal, and consulting expenses associated with general corporate, compliance, and transaction-related matters, partiallya offset$1.7 bymillion increase in personnel costs, a $0.4$0.7 million decreaseincrease in travelstock-based and entertainment expense,compensation, a $0.2$0.7 million decreaseincrease in bad debt expense,expense and a $0.1 million decreaseincrease in businessdepreciation insurance.and amortization expense.
Total other income, net decreased 3%15% during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. This decrease was due to a decrease in interest income on cash and cash equivalents driven by lower interest rates and lower average money market fund balances.balances for the three months ended June 30, 2026.
For the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, total interest cost incurred was $0.1 million. Interest costs capitalized during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 were zero.
The U.S. federal statutory tax rate was 21% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025. The benefit from income taxes was $0.4$0.8 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, attributable to year-to-date loss and excess tax benefits on vested stock-based compensation that will be realized during the year. The benefit from income taxes was de$0.3 minimismillion for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.2025 attributable to year-to-date loss and excess tax benefit on vested stock-based compensation.
Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025
Revenue
Revenue increased by $44.3 million, or 30%, during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was primarily due to a 75% increase in revenue from marketers in the healthcare, financial services, and business services industry verticals, while revenue attributable to marketers across our remaining industry verticals increased 14%.
Operating Expenses
Platform Operations
Platform operations expense increased by $28.8 million, or 35%, during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $24.9 million increase in TAC, a variable function of revenue related to our fixed CPM pricing option and certain arrangements related to our percentage of spend pricing option. The increase was also due to higher other platform operations expense which was driven by a $2.3 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense, a $0.9 million increase in personnel costs, a $0.5 million increase in technology costs and a $0.4 million increase in cloud and data center services both in support of our DSP, partially offset by a $0.2 million decrease in stock-based compensation.
Sales and Marketing
Sales and marketing expense increased by $7.0 million, or 24%, during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $3.1 million increase in personnel costs, a $2.4 million increase in stock-based compensation, a $0.9 million increase in travel and entertainment expense, a $0.3 million increase in advertising expense, a $0.2 million increase in facilities expense and a $0.1 million increase in depreciation expense.
Technology and Development
Technology and development expense increased by $3.4 million, or 23%, during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $1.6 million increase in stock-based compensation, a $1.1 million increase in personnel costs, a $0.7 million increase in technology costs in support of our DSP, a $0.2 million increase in travel and entertainment expense and a $0.1 million increase in facilities expense, partially offset by a $0.3 million decrease in depreciation expense.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expense increased by $8.0 million, or 30%, during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $3.7 million increase in personnel costs, a $3.3 million increase in accounting, legal, and consulting expenses associated with general corporate, compliance, and transaction-related matters, a $0.8 million increase in stock-based compensation and a $0.6 million increase in bad debt expense and a $0.1 million increase in depreciation and amortization, partially offset by a $0.3 million decrease in travel and entertainment expense and a $0.2 million decrease in business insurance.
Total Other Expense (Income), Net
Total other income, net decreased by $0.3 million, or 9%, during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in interest income on cash and cash equivalents driven by lower interest rates and lower money market fund balances.
For the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, total interest cost incurred was $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively. Interest costs capitalized during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 were zero.
Provision For (Benefit From) Income Taxes
The U.S. federal statutory tax rate was 21% for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025. The benefit from income taxes was $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, attributable to year-to-date loss and excess tax benefit on vested stock-based compensation. The benefit from income taxes was $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025, attributable to year-to-date loss and excess tax benefit on vested stock-based compensation.
(1)Acquisition and restructuring costs primarily consist of costs incurred related to our contemplated and completed acquisitions for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025.
(1)Acquisition and restructuring costs primarily consist of costs incurred related to our contemplated and completed acquisitions for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025.
(2)TRA remeasurement expense reflects the remeasurement of the TRA liability for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.
(1)Acquisition and restructuring costs primarily consist of costs incurred related to our contemplated and completed acquisitions for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025.
(2)TRA remeasurement expense reflects the remeasurement of the TRA liability for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.
(3)The estimated income tax effect of our share of income (loss) after non-GAAP reconciling items for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 is calculated using assumed blended tax rates of 28%26% and 23%,27%, respectively, which represent our expected corporate tax rates, excluding discrete and non-recurring tax items.
Diluted non-GAAP earnings (loss) per share of Class A common stock adjusts the basic non-GAAP earnings (loss) per share for the potential dilutive impact of shares of Class A common stock such as equity awards using the treasury-stock method and Class B common stock using the if-converted method. Diluted non-GAAP earnings (loss) per share of Class A common stock considers the impact of potentially dilutive securities except in periods in which there is a loss becauseto the extent their inclusion of the potential common shares would havebe an anti-dilutive effect.anti-dilutive. Shares of our Class B common stock, restricted stock units ("RSUs"), performance stock units ("PSUs"), and nonqualified stock options ("NQSOs") are considered potentially dilutive shares of Class A common stock.
(1)Acquisition and restructuring costs primarily consist of costs incurred related to our contemplated and completed acquisitions for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025.
(2)TRA remeasurement expense reflects the remeasurement of the TRA liability for the three months ended March 31, 2025.
(32)The estimated income tax effect of our share of income (loss) after non-GAAP reconciling items for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 is calculated using assumed blended tax rates of 28%26% and 23%,27%, respectively, which represent our expected corporate tax rates, excluding discrete and non-recurring tax items.
(3)The adjustment to net income attributable to noncontrolling interests represents stock-based compensation as well as acquisition and restructuring costs attributed to the noncontrolling interests outstanding during the period.
(4)Number of securities outstanding at the end of the period that were excluded from the computation of diluted non-GAAP earnings (loss) per share of Class A common stock because the performance conditions associated with these awards were not met assuming the end of the reporting period was the end of the performance period.
DSP insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 23 filings (5 insiders, 25 trade dates, 501,236 shares, about $5.7M; 19 of these filings say the sales were made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan). Net open-market shares: -501,236 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$5.7M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-18 | Madden Larry |
Open-market sale |
14,602 | $12.10 | $176.7K |
| 2026-09-16 | Madden Larry |
Open-market sale |
17,042 | $12.52 | $213.4K |
| 2026-09-10 | Vanderhook Christopher |
Disposition to issuer | 8,636 | $12.74 | $110.0K |
| 2026-09-10 | Vanderhook Timothy |
Disposition to issuer | 8,636 | $12.74 | $110.0K |
| 2026-09-10 | Madden Larry |
Shares withheld for tax | 24,016 | $12.74 | $306.0K |
| 2026-08-11 | Madden Larry |
Open-market sale |
26,020 | $13.03 | $339.0K |
| 2026-08-11 | Madden Larry |
Open-market sale |
1,431 | $13.68 | $19.6K |
| 2026-08-10 | Abrahams Craig Justin |
Grant/award | 10,720 | — | — |
| 2026-08-10 | Abrahams Craig Justin |
Grant/award | 28,389 | — | — |
| 2026-07-23 | Madden Larry |
Open-market sale |
2,814 | $10.69 | $30.1K |
| 2026-07-23 | Vanderhook Timothy |
Open-market sale |
4,304 | $10.47 | $45.1K |
| 2026-07-23 | Vanderhook Christopher |
Open-market sale |
4,304 | $10.47 | $45.1K |
| 2026-07-23 | Capital V Llc |
Open-market sale |
12,912 | $10.47 | $135.2K |
| 2026-07-22 | Vanderhook Timothy |
Open-market sale |
5,000 | $11.03 | $55.1K |
| 2026-07-22 | Vanderhook Christopher |
Open-market sale |
5,000 | $11.03 | $55.1K |
| 2026-07-22 | Capital V Llc |
Open-market sale |
15,000 | $11.03 | $165.4K |
| 2026-07-21 | Vanderhook Timothy |
Disposition to issuer |
12,500 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Vanderhook Timothy |
Option exercise |
12,500 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Vanderhook Timothy |
Open-market sale |
3,196 | $11.70 | $37.4K |
| 2026-07-21 | Vanderhook Christopher |
Disposition to issuer |
12,500 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Vanderhook Christopher |
Open-market sale |
3,196 | $11.70 | $37.4K |
| 2026-07-21 | Vanderhook Christopher |
Option exercise |
12,500 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Capital V Llc |
Open-market sale |
9,588 | $11.70 | $112.2K |
| 2026-07-21 | Capital V Llc |
Disposition to issuer |
37,500 | — | — |
| 2026-07-21 | Capital V Llc |
Option exercise |
37,500 | — | — |
| 2026-07-08 | Madden Larry |
Open-market sale |
11,273 | $12.69 | $143.1K |
| 2026-07-07 | Madden Larry |
Open-market sale |
9,149 | $12.86 | $117.7K |
| 2026-07-06 | Madden Larry |
Open-market sale |
10,097 | $12.78 | $129.0K |
| 2026-06-18 | Vanderhook Christopher |
Open-market sale |
2,500 | $10.96 | $27.4K |
| 2026-06-18 | Vanderhook Timothy |
Open-market sale |
2,500 | $10.96 | $27.4K |
| 2026-06-18 | Capital V Llc |
Open-market sale |
7,500 | $10.96 | $82.2K |
| 2026-06-17 | Vanderhook Christopher |
Open-market sale |
5,000 | $11.09 | $55.5K |
| 2026-06-17 | Vanderhook Timothy |
Open-market sale |
5,000 | $11.09 | $55.5K |
| 2026-06-17 | Capital V Llc |
Open-market sale |
15,000 | $11.09 | $166.3K |
| 2026-06-16 | Vanderhook Christopher |
Option exercise |
12,500 | — | — |
| 2026-06-16 | Vanderhook Christopher |
Open-market sale |
5,000 | $11.17 | $55.9K |
| 2026-06-16 | Vanderhook Christopher |
Disposition to issuer |
12,500 | — | — |
| 2026-06-16 | Vanderhook Timothy |
Disposition to issuer |
12,500 | — | — |
| 2026-06-16 | Vanderhook Timothy |
Open-market sale |
5,000 | $11.17 | $55.9K |
| 2026-06-16 | Vanderhook Timothy |
Option exercise |
12,500 | — | — |
| 2026-06-16 | Capital V Llc |
Option exercise |
37,500 | — | — |
| 2026-06-16 | Capital V Llc |
Disposition to issuer |
37,500 | — | — |
| 2026-06-16 | Capital V Llc |
Open-market sale |
15,000 | $11.17 | $167.6K |
| 2026-06-15 | Madden Larry |
Open-market sale | 25,376 | $11.10 | $281.7K |
| 2026-06-15 | Vanderhook Christopher |
Open-market sale | 9,125 | $11.10 | $101.3K |
| 2026-06-15 | Vanderhook Timothy |
Open-market sale | 9,125 | $11.10 | $101.3K |
| 2026-06-09 | Vanderhook Timothy |
Gift | 52,096 | — | — |
| 2026-06-09 | Vanderhook Timothy |
Grant/award | 52,096 | — | — |
| 2026-06-09 | Valdes Max O |
Open-market sale | 3,386 | $11.97 | $40.5K |
| 2026-06-09 | Vanderhook Christopher |
Gift | 52,096 | — | — |
| 2026-06-09 | Vanderhook Christopher |
Grant/award | 52,096 | — | — |
| 2026-06-08 | Valdes Max O |
Open-market sale | 3,300 | $12.10 | $39.9K |
| 2026-06-08 | Madden Larry |
Open-market sale |
14,670 | $12.10 | $177.5K |
| 2026-06-05 | Madden Larry |
Open-market sale |
18,663 | $12.24 | $228.4K |
| 2026-06-04 | Yang Vivian |
Grant/award | 14,544 | — | — |
| 2026-06-04 | Wilson Brett |
Grant/award | 14,544 | — | — |
| 2026-06-04 | Yang Vivian |
Grant/award | 15,948 | — | — |
| 2026-06-04 | Wilson Brett |
Grant/award | 15,948 | — | — |
| 2026-06-04 | Valdes Max O |
Grant/award | 15,948 | — | — |
| 2026-05-21 | Vanderhook Christopher |
Open-market sale |
2,500 | $10.79 | $27.0K |
Well-known investors holding DSP (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 425,741 | $5.4M | 0.01% | Reduced 4% |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 99,599 | $1.1M | — | Sold out |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 80,802 | $1.0M | 0.0% | New position |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 68,980 | $873.3K | 0.0% | Added 24% |
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 61,292 | $776.0K | 0.0% | Added 24% |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 27,376 | $346.6K | 0.0% | Reduced 29% |