EQH 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Equitable Holdings, Inc. (also EQH-PA, EQH-PC) · NYSE · Insurance Agents, Brokers & Service · CIK 1333986 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Affiliated Captive”
New heading “Offshore Affiliate”
Removed heading “Losses due to defaults by third parties and affiliates, including outsourcing relationships.”
Removed heading “The completion of the reinsurance transaction with Reinsurance Group of America is subject to several conditions, including the receipt of consents and approvals from government entities, which may impose conditions that could have an adverse effect on the expected economic and non-economic benefits to the Company or could cause the proposed transaction to be abandoned.”
Removed heading “State insurance laws limit the ability of our insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends and other distributions to Holdings.”
Removed heading “Uncertainty surrounding potential legal, regulatory and policy changes, as well as the potential for general market volatility, because of the change in the presidential administration in the United States.”
Largest changes
“Losses due to defaults by third parties and affiliates, including outsourcing relationships.”see in full comparison
“We depend on third parties and affiliates that owe us money, securities or other assets to pay or perform under their obligations. Defaults by one or more of these parties could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. …”see in full comparison
“The payment of dividends and other distributions to Holdings by its insurance subsidiaries, including its captive reinsurer, is regulated by state insurance laws and regulations. These restrictions may limit or prevent our insurance subsidiaries from making dividend or other payments to Holdings. These restrictions are based, in part, on earned surplus and the prior year’s statutory income and policyholder surplus. …”see in full comparison
Our business, results of operations or financial condition are materially affected by conditions in the global capital markets and the economy. A wide variety of factors continue to impact economic conditions and consumer confidence. These factors include, among others, uncertainty regarding the federal debt limit, volatility in the capital markets, equity market declines, inflationary pressures, plateauing or decreasing economic growth, high fuel and energy costs and changes in fiscal or monetary policy. The Russian invasion ofsee in full comparisontheUkraine,Ukraine,hostilities in theIsrael-Hamas war and broaderMiddleEastern hostilities,East, and the ensuing conflicts and the sanctions and other measures imposed in response to these conflicts, as well asthe U.S. presidential administration’s threats of tariffs,tariff andretaliatorytradetariffs in response,disputes, have significantly increased the level of volatility in the financial markets and have increased the level of economic and political uncertainty. Given our interest rate and equity market exposure in our investment and derivatives portfolios and many of our products, these factors could have a material adverse effect on us. The value of our investments and derivatives portfolios may also be adversely affected by reductions in price transparency, changes in the assumptions or methodology we use to estimate fair value and changes in investor confidence or preferences, which could potentially result in higher realized or unrealized losses. Market volatility may also make it difficult to transact in or to value certain of our securities if trading becomes less frequent.
“The completion of the reinsurance transaction with Reinsurance Group of America is subject to several conditions, including the receipt of consents and approvals from government entities, which may impose conditions that could have an adverse effect on the expected economic and non-economic benefits to the Company or could cause the proposed transaction to be abandoned.”see in full comparison
“Uncertainty surrounding potential legal, regulatory and policy changes, as well as the potential for general market volatility, because of the change in the presidential administration in the United States.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (40)
Our business, results of operations or financial condition are materially affected by conditions in the global capital markets and the economy. A wide variety of factors continue to impact economic conditions and consumer confidence. These factors include, among others, uncertainty regarding the federal debt limit, volatility in the capital markets, equity market declines, inflationary pressures, plateauing or decreasing economic growth, high fuel and energy costs and changes in fiscal or monetary policy. The Russian invasion of theUkraine, Ukraine,hostilities in the Israel-Hamas war and broader Middle Eastern hostilities,East, and the ensuing conflicts and the sanctions and other measures imposed in response to these conflicts, as well as the U.S. presidential administration’s threats of tariffs,tariff and retaliatorytrade tariffs in response,disputes, have significantly increased the level of volatility in the financial markets and have increased the level of economic and political uncertainty. Given our interest rate and equity market exposure in our investment and derivatives portfolios and many of our products, these factors could have a material adverse effect on us. The value of our investments and derivatives portfolios may also be adversely affected by reductions in price transparency, changes in the assumptions or methodology we use to estimate fair value and changes in investor confidence or preferences, which could potentially result in higher realized or unrealized losses. Market volatility may also make it difficult to transact in or to value certain of our securities if trading becomes less frequent.
Some of our retirement and protection products and certain of our investment products, and our investment returns, are sensitive to interest rate fluctuations, and changes in interest rates and interest rate benchmarks may adversely affect our investment returns and results of operations, including in the following respects:
In the U.S., the continued disagreement over the federal debt limit and other budget questions threatens the economy. Failure to resolve these issues in a timely manner could result in a government shutdown, erratic shutdown in government spending or a default on government debt, which could result in increased market volatility and reduced economic activity.
We and certain of our vendors retain confidential information (including customer transactional data and personal information about our customers, the employees and customers of our customers, and our own employees). The privacy or security of this information may be compromised, including as a result of an information security breach. We have implemented a formal, risk-based data security program, including physical, technical, and administrative safeguards; however, failure to implement and maintain effective data protection and cybersecurity programs that comply with applicable law, or any compromise of the security, confidentiality, integrity, or availability of our information systems, or those of our vendors, the cloud-based systems we use, or the sensitive information stored on such systems, through cyber-attackscyber-attacks, employee error or malfeasance, system degradation, or for any other reason that results in unauthorized access, use, modification, disclosure or destruction of personally identifiable information, customer information, or other confidential or proprietary information, or the disruption of critical operations and services, could damage our reputation, deter people from purchasing our products, subject us to significant civil and criminal liability and require us to incur significant technical, legal and other expenses any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. Moreover, while we maintain cyber incident liability insurance, it may be insufficient to cover all costs and liabilities associated with a cyber incident, or we may be unable to retain or obtain such insurance in the future on commercially practicable terms. For further information on the cybersecurity and data privacy laws applicable to our insurance subsidiaries, see “Cybersecurity—Overview of Equitable Cybersecurity Risk Management” and “Cybersecurity—Governance of Cybersecurity Risk Management.”
Any catastrophic event, terrorist attacks, accidents, floods, severe storms or hurricanes, pandemics and other public health issues, cyber-terrorism, or cyber-terrorism,the failure of telecommunications or other critical infrastructure could have a material and adverse effect on our business. We could experience long-term interruptions in our service and the services provided by our significant vendors. Some of our operational systems are not fully redundant, and our disaster recovery and business continuity planning cannot account for all eventualities. Additionally, unanticipated problems with our disaster recovery systems could further impede our ability to conduct business, particularly if those problems affect our computer-based data processing, transmission, storage and retrieval systems and destroy valuable data. We could experience a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition and the operating results of our insurance business due to increased mortality and, in certain cases, morbidity rates and/or its impact on the economy and financial markets. We may also experience lower sales or other negative impacts to the use of services we provide if economic conditions worsen due to a catastrophe or pandemic or other public health emergency, as the financial condition of current or potential customers, policyholders, and clients may be adversely affected. See “—Conditions in the global capital markets and economy.” A catastrophe may affect our computer-based data processing, transmission, storage and retrieval systems and destroy valuable data. Climate change may increase the frequency and severity of weather-related disasters and pandemics. These events could result in an adverse impact on our ability to conduct our business, including our ability to sell our products and services and our ability to adjudicate and pay claims in a timely manner.
If economic conditions worsen as a result of a catastrophe, pandemic or other public health issue, companies may be unable inability to make interest and principal payments on their debt securities or mortgage loans that we hold for investment purposes. Accordingly, we may still incur significant losses that can result in a decline in net investment income (“NII”) and/or material increases in credit losses on our investment portfolios. With respect to commercial real estate, there could be potential impacts to estimates of expected losses resulting from lower underlying values, reflecting current market conditions at that time.
Misconduct and excessive or inappropriate risk taking by our employees, financial professionals, agents, intermediaries, representatives of our broker-dealer subsidiaries -subsidiaries, or employees of our vendors could result in obligationspublic to report such misconduct publicly,reporting, regulatory enforcement proceedings and, even findings that violations of law were committed by us or our subsidiaries,proceedings, regulatory sanctions or serious reputational or financial harm.harm, as well as significant technical, legal and other expenses. Certain types of violations may result in our inability to act as an investment adviser or broker-dealer or to represent issuers in Regulation D offerings by acting as placement agent, general partner or otheranother roles.role. We employ controls and procedures designed to monitor employees’ and financial professionals’ business decisions and to prevent them from taking excessive or inappropriate risks, including with respect to information security, but employees may take such risks regardless of such controls and procedures. If our employees or financial professionals take excessive or inappropriate risks, those risks could harm our reputation, subject us to significant civil or criminal liability and require us to incur significant technical, legal and other expenses.
We may consider potential strategic transactions, including acquisitions, dispositions, mergers, reinsurance, joint ventures and similar transactions. These transactions may not be effective and could result in decreased earnings and harm to our competitive position. In addition, these transactions, if undertaken, may involve a number of risks and; present financial, managerial and operational challenges. Furthermore, strategic transactions maychallenges; require us to increase our leverage; or, if we issue shares to fund an acquisition, would dilute the holdings of the existing stockholders. Any of the above could cause us to fail to realize the benefits anticipated from any such transaction.
Losses due to defaults by third parties and affiliates, including outsourcing relationships.
We depend on third parties and affiliates that owe us money, securities or other assets to pay or perform under their obligations. Defaults by one or more of these parties could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. Moreover, as a result of contractual provisions certain swap dealers require us to add to derivatives documentation and to agreements, we may not be able to exercise default rights or enforce transfer restrictions against certain counterparties which may limit our ability to recover amounts due to us upon a counterparty’s default. We rely on various counterparties and other vendors to augment our existing investment, operational, financial and technological capabilities, but the use of a vendor does not diminish our responsibility to ensure that client and regulatory obligations are met. Disruptions in the financial markets and other economic challenges may cause our counterparties and other vendors to experience significant cash flow problems or even render them insolvent, which may expose us to significant costs and impair our ability to conduct business. We are also subject to the risk that our rights against third parties may not be enforceable in all circumstances. The deterioration or perceived deterioration in the credit quality of third parties whose securities or obligations we hold could result in losses or adversely affect our ability to use those securities or obligations for liquidity purposes.
We hold certain investments that may lack liquidity, such as privately placed fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans, commercial mortgage backed securities and private alternative investments. In the past, even some of our very high quality investments experienced reduced liquidity during periods of market volatility or disruption. If we were required to liquidate these investments on short notice or were required to post or return collateral, we may have difficulty doing so and be forced to sell them for less than we otherwise would have been able to realize. The reported values of our relatively illiquid types of investments do not necessarily reflect the current market price for the asset. If we were forced to sell certain of our assets in the current market, there can be no assurance that we would be able to sell them for the prices at which we have recorded them and we might be forced to sell them at significantly lower prices, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.
Our reinsurance arrangement with an affiliated captive.entities.
Affiliated Captive
The reinsurance arrangement with EQ AZ Life Re Company (the “Affiliated Captive”) provides important capital management benefits to Equitable Financial and Equitable America (collectively, the “Affiliated Cedants”).Financial. Under applicable statutory accounting rules, theEquitable AffiliatedFinancial Cedants areis currently, and will in the future be, entitled to a credit in theirits calculations of reserves for amounts reinsured to the Affiliated Captive, to the extent the Affiliated Captive holds assets in trust or provides letters of credit or other financing acceptable to the respective domestic regulatorsregulator of theEquitable Affiliated Cedants.Financial. The level of assets required to be maintained in the trust fluctuates based on market and interest rate movements, age of the policies, mortality experience and policyholder behavior. Increasing reserve requirements may necessitate that additional assets be placed in trust or securing additional letters of credit,credit secured, which could impact the liquidity of the Affiliated Captive.
Offshore Affiliate
The reinsurance arrangement with Equitable America and Equitable Bermuda (the “Offshore Affiliate”) provides important capital management benefits to Equitable America. Under applicable statutory accounting rules, Equitable America is currently, and will in the future be, entitled to a credit in their calculations of reserves for amounts reinsured to the Offshore Affiliate. However, if the Offshore Affiliate loses its reciprocal jurisdiction reinsurer status in Arizona, the Offshore Affiliate will have to maintain collateral equal to the U.S. statutory accounting reserve for Equitable America to retain this credit. We cannot be certain that the Offshore Affiliate will be able to maintain this collateral.
The completion of the reinsurance transaction with Reinsurance Group of America is subject to several conditions, including the receipt of consents and approvals from government entities, which may impose conditions that could have an adverse effect on the expected economic and non-economic benefits to the Company or could cause the proposed transaction to be abandoned.
Subsequent to December 31, 2024, our subsidiaries, Equitable Financial, as well as our subsidiaries Equitable America and Equitable L&A, entered into a master transaction agreement with Reinsurance Group of America (“RGA”) on February 23, 2025 pursuant to which at closing and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in such agreement, RGA would enter into reinsurance agreements, as reinsurer, with each such subsidiary, as ceding company, to reinsure 75% of such ceding companies’ in-force individual life insurance block on a pro-rata basis (the “RGA Reinsurance Transaction”).
The completion of the RGA Reinsurance Transaction, and entry into the reinsurance agreements contemplated thereby, is subject to several conditions, including, among others, the receipt of approvals from certain U.S. insurance regulators, including the New York Department of Financial Services, the Arizona Department of Insurance and Financial Institutions and the Missouri Department of Commerce & Insurance, as well as the Bermuda Monetary Authority. The Company cannot provide any assurance that either it or RGA will obtain the necessary approvals.
In addition, regulatory entities may impose certain requirements or obligations as conditions for their approval or in connection with their review. The master transaction agreement may require the Company (including its applicable subsidiaries) or RGA to accept certain conditions or limitations or modification to the transaction document from these regulators that could adversely effect the expected economic and non-economic benefits of the RGA Reinsurance Transaction to the Company or could cause the proposed transaction to be abandoned. The parties are not required to accept conditions that would or would reasonably be likely to have a Burdensome Condition (as defined in the master transaction agreement), which assessment will be made at or prior to closing, and the Company cannot provide any assurance that any required conditions, limitations or modification will not, individually or in the aggregate, have such an effect. Furthermore, it could take longer to receive the requisite governmental consents and approvals than currently anticipated, and any such delay could cause the Company to fail to realize the benefits it currently expects to receive from the RGA Reinsurance Transaction or result in the abandonment of the transaction.
On February 24, 2025, Holdings commenced a cash tender offer (the “Offer”) to purchase up to 46 million AB Holding Units at a price of $38.50 per unit, less any applicable tax withholding, for an aggregate purchase price of $1.8 billion. The Offer will expire on March 24, 2025 unless extended or earlier terminated. Holdings expects to fund the Offer from available cash and cash equivalents and the Term Loan described under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Holdings Credit Facilities.” In the event the RGA Reinsurance Transaction is significantly delayed or fails to close, and the Company does not receive the expected economic benefits, the use of cash and cash equivalents, along with a draw under the Term Loan, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, liquidity or financial condition, including the ability to meet our 2027 financial targets.
In any particular year, statutory surplus amounts and RBC ratios may increase or decrease depending on a variety of factors. For further information on the NAIC review of the RBC treatment of certain complex assets in which insurers have invested during recent years, see “Business—Regulation—Insurance Regulation—Surplus and Capital; Risk Based Capital.” Additionally, state insurance regulators have significant leeway in how to interpret existing regulations, which could further impact the amount of statutory capital or reserves that we must maintain. Equitable Financial is primarily regulated by the NYDFS, which from time to time has taken more stringent positions than other state insurance regulators on matters affecting, among other things, statutory capital or reserves. In certain circumstances, particularly those involving significant market declines, the effect of these more stringent positions may be that our financial condition appears to be worse than competitors who are not subject to the same stringent standards, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations or financial condition. Moreover, rating agencies may implement changes to their internal models that have the effect of increasing or decreasing the amount of capital our insurance subsidiaries must hold in order to maintain their current ratings. To the extent that our statutory capital resources are deemed to be insufficient to maintain a particular rating by one or more rating agencies, our insurance subsidiaries’ financial strength and credit ratings might be downgraded by one or more rating agencies. There can be no assurance that any of our insurance subsidiaries will be able to maintain its current RBC ratio in the future or that its RBC ratio will not fall to a level that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
State insurance laws limit the ability of our insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends and other distributions to Holdings.
The payment of dividends and other distributions to Holdings by its insurance subsidiaries, including its captive reinsurer, is regulated by state insurance laws and regulations. These restrictions may limit or prevent our insurance subsidiaries from making dividend or other payments to Holdings. These restrictions are based, in part, on earned surplus and the prior year’s statutory income and policyholder surplus. In general, dividends may be paid only from earned surplus (typically defined as available or unassigned surplus, subject to possible adjustments) which is derived from realized net profits on the company’s business. Dividends up to specified levels are considered ordinary and generally may be made without prior regulatory approval. Meanwhile, dividends paid from sources other than earned surplus or in larger amounts, often called “extraordinary dividends,” are generally subject to approval by the insurance commissioner of the relevant state of domicile. In addition, certain states may prohibit the payment of dividends from other than the insurance company’s earned surplus. If any of our insurance subsidiaries subject to the positive earned surplus requirement do not succeed in building up sufficient positive earned surplus to have ordinary dividend capacity in future years, such subsidiary would be unable to pay dividends or distributions to our holding company, in certain cases, absent prior approval of its domiciliary insurance regulator. For further information on state insurance laws related to payments of dividends, see “Business—Regulation—Insurance Regulation—Holding Company and Shareholder Dividend Regulation.”
From time to time, the NAIC and various state insurance regulators have considered, and may in the future consider, proposals to further limit dividend payments that an insurance company may make without regulatory approval. For example, the NYDFS enacted Regulation 213. Due to a permitted statutory accounting practice agreed to with the NYDFS, Equitable Financial needs the prior approval of the NYDFS to pay the portion, if any, of any ordinary dividend that exceeds the ordinary dividend that Equitable Financial would be permitted to pay under New York’s insurance laws absent the application of such permitted practice. If more stringent restrictions on dividend payments are adopted by jurisdictions in which our insurance subsidiaries are domiciled, such restrictions could have the effect of significantly reducing dividends or other amounts payable to Holdings by its insurance subsidiaries without prior approval by regulatory authorities. The ability of our insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions is also limited by our need to maintain the financial strength ratings assigned to such subsidiaries by the rating agencies. These ratings depend to a large extent on the capitalization levels of our insurance subsidiaries.
AB derives most of its revenues from investment advisory and services fees,fees that vary based on the type of service, account size, and total assets managed for a client, and that are typically calculated as a percentage of the value of AUM on a specified date, or as an average over a billing period. These fees vary based on the type of service, account size, and total assets managed for a client. Several factors can adversely affect AB’sthe AUMmarket value and composition,composition of AB’s AUM, including market factors, client preferences, AB’s investment performance, investing trends, service changes and interest rate changes. A decrease in the market value or amount of AB’s AUM, an adverse mix shift in itsthe composition of AUM, or a reduction in AB’s fee levels would negatively impact AB’s investmentrevenues advisory fees and revenues. Reduced revenues,and, without a corresponding decrease in expenses, would adversely affect AB’s and our operating results.
AB sometimes charges performance-based fees, which include a base advisory fee plus an additional fee based on investment results, either in absolute terms or relative to a benchmark Some of these fees have a high-watermark provision, meaning if a client account underperforms, it must recover losses before AB can earn future performance-based fees.results. Failure to meet performance targets means no performance-based fee for that period,period. andPerformance-based fee arrangements can also have a high-watermark provisionsprovision, meaning that an underperforming client account must recover losses before AB can impareearn future performance-based fees, which can impair future fee earnings.
AB’s financial performance relies on its ability to quickly adapt to changes in the asset management industry, meet evolving client needs, and develop, market, and manage new investment products and services. Creating new products,products and services, including those focused on specific in industries, sectors, or criteria like ESG,criteria, requires continuous innovation,,innovation and significant time, resources, and ongoing support. Introducing new products and services involves substantial risks and uncertainties, such establishing appropriate operational controls, adapting to shifting client and market preferences, facing competition, and complying with regulatory requirements.
AB has a seed investment program to build track records and support marketing for its new products.products, Thesebut investmentsthat areis subject to market risk. AB’s risk management team oversees a seed hedging program to minimize this risk,risk. considering practical and cost factors. However, notNot all seed investments are hedged, exposingand ABAB’s tohedges are imperfect, leaving some market risk. Additionally, AB may also face basis risk as it cannot always precisely hedge its market exposure, leading to potential relative spreads between market sectors. Consequently, capital market volatility can significantly impact its financial and operating results.
ABFurthermore, usesusing various derivative instruments,derivatives, such as futures, forwards, swaps, and options in its seed hedging program. While it hedges broad market risks, AB’s hedges are imperfect, leaving some market risk. Furthermore, using derivatives introduces counterparty risk (the risk of credit-related losses if counterparties fail to perform, regulatory risk (e.g., short selling restrictions) and cash/synthetic basis risk (the risk that underlying positions do not move identically to related derivatives).
In accordance with applicable regulatory requirements, contractual obligations or client direction, AB has procedures for pricing and valuing securities and other positions in client accounts orand for company investments. AB’s Valuation Committee and sub-committees, comprising senior officers and employees, overseeoversees a consistent framework of pricing controls and valuation processes for the firm and its advisory affiliates. If market quotations for a security are unavailable, the Valuation Committee determines its fair value.
ExtraordinaryImproper valuation of securities, which can result from factors such as extraordinary market volatility, liquidity constraints orand failure to consider all factors when determining fair value could lead to improper valuation of securities. This couldcan result in inaccurate AUM figures, incorrect net asset valuesNAVs for company-sponsored funds, and inaccurate financial reporting. Although the percentage of AB’s AUM that based on limited market observability is not significant,Incorrect valuations can harm AB’s clients, create regulatory issues and damage itsAB’s reputation.
AB uses quantitative and systematic models in many of its investment services, often alongside fundamental research. These models are developed by senior quantitative professionals and typically are implemented by IT professionals. AB’s Model Risk Oversight Committee, supported by the Model Risk Team, oversees the model governance framework and review activities. However, dueDue to the complexity and data dependency of these models, errors may occur, resulting in client losses and reputational damage, and AB’s controls might fail to detect them.the Undetected errors could lead to client losses and reputational damage.errors.
AB must increasingly manage actual and potential conflicts of interest, including situations where its services to one client may conflict with another’s interests.interest. Failure to address thesemanage conflicts appropriately could harm AB’s reputation, operations and business prospects.prospects, If AB fails, or appears to fail, in handling conflicts appropriately, its reputation could suffer, andcause clients mayto be less willing to engage with AB.AB, Additionally, potential or perceived conflicts couldand lead to litigation or regulatory enforcement actions.
We are heavily regulated, and regulators continue to increase their oversight over financial services companies. The adoption of new laws, regulations or standards and changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws, regulations or standards have directly affected, and will continue to affect, our business, including making our efforts to comply more expensive and time-consuming. In recent years, insurance regulators and the NAIC have been focused on enhancing regulatory oversight of insurers’ investments in complex assets, such as leveraged loans and CLOs, the use of AI technologies and “big data,” and the management of climate risk. For additional information on regulatory developments and the risks we face, see “Business—Regulation”.
Our retirement and protection business is subject to a complex and extensive array of state and federal tax, securities, insurance and employee benefit plan laws and regulations, which are administered and enforced by a number of different governmental and self-regulatory authorities, including, among others, state insurance regulators, state securities administrators, state banking authorities, the SEC, FINRA, the DOL and the IRS. Failure to administer our retirement and protectionsprotection products in accordance with contract provisions or applicable law, or to meet any of these complex tax, securities or insurance requirements could subject us to administrative penalties imposed by a governmental or self-regulatory authority, unanticipated costs associated with remedying such failure or other claims, litigation, harm to our reputationreputation, or interruption of our operations.
Uncertainty surrounding potential legal, regulatory and policy changes, as well as the potential for general market volatility, because of the change in the presidential administration in the United States.
We face regulatory and tax uncertainties because of possible changes arising from the new presidential administration. The nature, timing and economic effects of any potential change to the current legal and regulatory framework affecting our insurance subsidiaries or the products they offer remains highly uncertain. Uncertainty surrounding future changes may adversely affect our operating environment and have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.
Our secondthird amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our sixthseventh amended and restated by-laws include a number of provisions that may discourage, delay or prevent a change in our management or prevent a takeover attempt that stockholders may consider favorable. These provisions may prevent our stockholders from receiving the benefit from any premium to the market price of our common stock offered in a takeover context or may even adversely affect the price of our common stock if the provisions discourage takeover attempts. Our secondthird amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and sixthseventh restated by-laws may also make it difficult for stockholders to replace or remove our management.
Our secondthird amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for a number of actions. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the exclusive provision shall not preclude or contract the scope of exclusive federal or concurrent jurisdiction for actions brought under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act or the respective rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “2025 Assumption Updates”
New heading “2025 Assumption Updates”
New heading “Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2024”
New heading “Net Flows and AV”
New heading “Year Ended December 31, 2024 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2023 for the Retirement Segment”
New heading “Net Flows and AV”
New heading “Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2024 for the Asset Management Segment”
New heading “Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2024 for the Wealth Management Segment”
New heading “Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2024 for Corporate and Other”
New heading “Operating earnings (losses)”
New heading “Year Ended December 31, 2024 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2023 for Corporate and Other”
New heading “Private Credit Investments”
Removed heading “Term Loan Agreement”
Removed heading “Share Repurchase Authority”
Removed heading “2022 Assumption Updates”
Removed heading “2022 Assumption Updates”
Removed heading “Protection Solutions Reserves”
Removed heading “Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss)”
Removed heading “Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2022”
Removed heading “Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2022 for the Individual Retirement Segment”
Removed heading “Year Ended December 31, 2024 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2023 for the Group Retirement Segment”
Removed heading “Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2022 for the Group Retirement Segment”
Removed heading “Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2022 for the Asset Management Segment”
Removed heading “Year Ended December 31, 2024 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2023 for the Protection Solutions Segment”
Removed heading “Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2022 for the Protection Solutions Segment”
Removed heading “Wealth Management”
Removed heading “Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2022 for the Wealth Management Segment”
Removed heading “Year Ended December 31, 2024 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2023 for the Legacy Segment”
Removed heading “Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2022 for the Legacy Segment”
Largest changes
“Although the Term Loan is required to be repaid with the cash proceeds from the RGA Reinsurance Transaction, it may be prepaid at any time without a fee (other than customary breakage costs relating to the prepayment of any drawn loans). Borrowings under the Term Loan Agreement will bear interest at a rate per annum, which will be, at Holdings’ option, a rate equal to an applicable margin, which is subject to adjustment based on the credit ratings of Holdings, plus an Alternate Base Rate or Adjusted Term SOFR (each as defined in the Term Loan Agreement). …”see in full comparison
“Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2022 for the Individual Retirement Segment”see in full comparison
“Year Ended December 31, 2024 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2023 for the Protection Solutions Segment”see in full comparison
“Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2022 for the Protection Solutions Segment”see in full comparison
“Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2024 for the Wealth Management Segment”see in full comparison
“Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2022 for the Wealth Management Segment”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (317)
We manage our business through sixthree segments: Individual Retirement, Group Retirement, Asset Management, Protection Solutions, Wealth Management and Legacy.Wealth Management. We report certain activities and items that are not included in these segments in Corporate and Other. Prior period results have been revised in connection with updates to our reportable segments. See Note 21 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on our segments.
On FebruaryJuly 23,31, 2025, Equitable Financial, as well as Equitable America and Equitable Financial L&A,A (each a “Ceding Company” and, collectively, the “Ceding Companies”), completed the master transaction agreement with RGA entered into aon MasterFebruary Transaction23, Agreement with RGA2025 pursuant to which, at closingwhich and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in such agreement, RGA would enterentered into reinsurance agreements, as reinsurer, with each suchCeding subsidiary, as ceding company,Company, to effect the RGA Reinsurance Transaction. The transaction is expected to reinsure 75% of such ceding companies’ in-force individual life insurance block, and upon closing, generate total value for Holdings of over $2 billion, which includes a positive ceding commission and capital release, and is expected to close in mid-2025.
At the closing of the transaction, (i) each of Equitable Financial and Equitable America entered into a separate coinsurance and modified coinsurance agreement with RGA and (ii) Equitable Financial L&A entered into a coinsurance agreement with RGA, each with an effective date of April 1, 2025, pursuant to which each ceding company ceded to RGA a 75% quota share of such ceding company’s in-force individual life insurance block and Closed Block. At the closing of the transaction, assets supporting the general account liabilities relating to the reinsured contracts were deposited into a trust account for the benefit of Equitable Financial and a trust account for the benefit of Equitable America and Equitable Financial L&A, which assets will secure RGA’s obligations to each ceding company under the applicable reinsurance agreement. Equitable Financial and Equitable America reinsured the applicable separate accounts and closed block relating to the applicable reinsured contracts on a modified coinsurance basis. In addition, the investment of assets in each trust account will be subject to investment guidelines and certain capital adequacy related triggers will require enhanced funding. The reinsurance agreements also contain additional counterparty risk management and mitigation provisions. Each ceding company will continue to administer the applicable reinsured contracts.
As part of the transaction, on June 16, 2025, ABLP entered into an investment advisory agreement with RGA, pursuant to which AB will manage certain assets to be specified representing approximately 70% of assets supporting the reserves associated with the ceded policies under the reinsurance agreements.
Novation
Effective January 17, 2025, Equitable Financial novated certain legacy variable annuity policies sold between 2006-2008, comprised of non-New York “Accumulator” policies containing fixed rate GMIB and/or GMDB guarantees reinsured by Venerable under the combined co-insurance and modified coinsurance basis agreement executed on June 1, 2021.
As a result of the novation of certain Legacy VA policies completed during the first quarter 2025, the Company recorded a loss of $499 million in pre-tax net income and an increase of $263 million in pre-tax AOCI, for a total impact loss of $236 million. The negative net income impact is mostly driven by the reduction of the purchased MRB asset of $2.0 billion and the reduction of Liability for MRBs of $1.6 billion, offset by a decrease in reinsurance deposit liability of $183 million. Purchased MRB asset reduction is larger than the direct MRB liability reduction since the Venerable reinsurance assets sit in a collateralized trust and thus materially reduce the non-performance risk associated with the counterparty. Deposit account liability decreases as novation leads to faster amortization of the liability. The novation impact from the base contracts and the contracts in payout status is less material, as the decrease in policyholders’ account balance of $33 million and decrease in liability for future policyholders’ benefits of $458 million are largely offset by a decrease in Amounts due to reinsurers of $432 million.
Tender Offer and AB Unit Exchange
On February 24, 2025, Holdings commenced the AB Tender Offer to purchase up to 46 million AB Holding Units at a price of $38.50 per unit, less any applicable tax withholding, for an aggregate purchase price of $1.8 billion. On April 3, 2025, Holdings purchased (the “Purchase”) 19.7 million AB Holding Units pursuant to the AB Tender Offer for an aggregate cost of $758 million. The AB Holding Units accepted for purchase represent approximately 17.9% of the outstanding units as of March 31, 2025. On July 10, 2025, AB and Holdings entered into an Amended and Restated Master Exchange Agreement to increase the AB Units that remain available for exchange from 4.8 million AB Units to 19.7 million AB Units, and Holdings exchanged 19.7 million AB Holding Units for an equal number of limited partnership interests in ABLP. The exchange had no effect on Holdings’ economic interest in AB.
On February 24, 2025, Holdings commenced a cash tender offer (the “Offer”) to purchase up to 46 million AB Holding Units at a price of $38.50 per unit, less any applicable tax withholding, for an aggregate purchase price of $1.8 billion. The Offer will expire on March 24, 2025 unless extended or earlier terminated. The Offer is not conditioned upon the receipt of financing or any minimum number of units being tendered but is subject to certain other conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase, dated February 24, 2025. If Holdings purchases the maximum of 46 million units in the Offer, Holdings will own approximately 41.7% of the issued and outstanding AB Holding Units and will have an approximate 77.5% economic interest in AB. Holdings expects to fund the Offer from available cash and cash equivalents and the Term Loan described in the following paragraphs. Additional information about the Offer is set forth in the tender offer statement on Schedule TO filed with the SEC, including the Offer to Purchase.
Term Loan Agreement
In connection with the commencement of the Offer described in the precedent paragraph, Holdings entered into the 364-Day Term Loan Credit Agreement (the “Term Loan Agreement”) with respect to a $500 million senior unsecured delayed-draw term loan (the “Term Loan”). The Term Loan will be used, along with available cash and cash equivalents, to fund the Offer and related fees and expenses. The Term Loan may be drawn at any time until April 24, 2025 and will mature 364 days from the date of funding, provided that Holdings may elect not to incur all or a portion of such Term Loan to the extent it is unnecessary to fund the Offer.
Although the Term Loan is required to be repaid with the cash proceeds from the RGA Reinsurance Transaction, it may be prepaid at any time without a fee (other than customary breakage costs relating to the prepayment of any drawn loans). Borrowings under the Term Loan Agreement will bear interest at a rate per annum, which will be, at Holdings’ option, a rate equal to an applicable margin, which is subject to adjustment based on the credit ratings of Holdings, plus an Alternate Base Rate or Adjusted Term SOFR (each as defined in the Term Loan Agreement). The funding of the Term Loan is subject to the satisfaction of customary conditions for facilities of such type that are set forth therein.
Share Repurchase Authority
On February 13, 2025, Holdings’s Board approved an additional $1.5 billion of share repurchases under Holdings’s share repurchase program. As of December 31, 2024, Holdings had $445 million of authorized capacity remaining under its prior authorization. The repurchase program does not obligate Holdings to purchase any particular number of shares. See Note 22 for additional details on the repurchase program.
U.S. stocks finished higher in the fourth quarter of 2025, despite a long government shutdown and signs of a cooling labor market. The S&P 500 gained 2.7% for the quarter and delivered about 18% for the year, its third straight year of double‑digit returns. Small‑cap stocks, represented by the Russell 2000, rose 2.2% in the fourth quarter and ended the year up 13%.
ADespite the above, a wide variety of factors continue to impact global financial and economic conditions. These factors include, among others, uncertainty regarding the federal debt limit, volatility in the capital markets, equity market declines, plateauing or decreasing economic growth, high fuel and energy costs, changes in fiscal or monetary policy and geopolitical tensions. The Russian invasion of the Ukraine, the Israel-Hamas war and broader Middle Eastern hostilities, and the ensuing conflicts and the sanctions and other measures imposed in response to these conflicts, as well as the U.S. presidential administration’s threats of tariffs,tariffs and retaliatorytrade tariffs in response,disputes, significantly increased the level of volatility in the financial markets and have increased the level of economic and political uncertainty.
Stressed conditions, volatility and disruptions in the capital markets, particular markets, or financial asset classes can have an adverse effect on us, in part because we have a large investment portfolio. In addition, our insurance liabilities and derivatives are sensitive to changing market factors, including equity market performance and interest rates, which fell twicethree times in November2025, andincluding Decemberby 2024. However,0.25% in December 2024,2025. However, the Federal Reserve scaledsignaled backa expectationsmore cautious approach for rate2026, cutswhich in 2025 duecontributed to persistentsome inflationlate-year andmarket a robust labor market.volatility. An increase in market volatility could continue to affect our business, including through effects on the yields we earn on invested assets, changes in required reserves and capital and fluctuations in the value of our AUM, AV or AUA from which we derive our fee income. These effects could be exacerbated by uncertainty about future fiscal policy, changes in tax policy, the scope of potential deregulation and levels of global trade.
During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our annual review of the assumptions underlying the valuation of DAC, deferred sales inducement assets, unearned revenue liabilities, liabilities for future policyholder benefits and MRBs for our IndividualRetirement Retirement, Group Retirement, Protection Solutions,business and Legacyblocks segmentsof policies reported in Corporate and Other. (assumption reviews are not relevant for the Asset Management and Wealth Management segments). Assumptions are based on a combination of Company experience, industry experience, management actions and expert judgementjudgment and reflect our best estimate as of the date of the applicable financial statements.
Most of the variable annuity products, variable universal lifeVUL insurance and universal lifeUL insurance products we offer maintain policyholder deposits that are reported as liabilities and classified within either Separate Accounts liabilities or policyholder account balances. Our products and riders also impact liabilities for future policyholder benefits, MRBs and unearned revenues and assets for DAC and DSI. The valuation of these assets and liabilities (other than deposits) is based on differing accounting methods depending on the product, each of which requires numerous assumptions and considerable judgment. The accounting guidance applied in the valuation of these assets and liabilities includes, but is not limited to, the following: (i) traditional life insurance products for which assumptions are updated annually to estimate the value of future death, morbidity or income benefits; (ii) universal lifeUL insurance and variable life insurance secondary guarantees for which benefit liabilities are determined by estimating the expected value of death benefits payable when the account balance is projected to be zero and recognizing those benefits ratably over the accumulation period based on total expected assessments; and (iii) certain product guarantees reported as MRBs at fair value.
2025 Assumption Updates
The impact of the economic assumption update in the third quarter 2025 was a decrease of $80 million to income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes and a decrease to net income (loss) of $63 million.
The net impact of this assumption update on income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes of $80 million consisted of an increase in other income of $6 million, an increase in remeasurement of liability for future policy benefits of $3 million, a decrease in policyholders’ benefits of $1 million and an increase in change in MRBs and purchased MRBs of $84 million.
The impact of the economic assumption update duringin the third quarter 2024 was an increase of $20 million to income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes and an increase to net income (loss) of $16 million.
2022 Assumption Updates
The impact of the economic assumption update during 2022 was a decrease of $206 million to income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes and a decrease to net income (loss) of $163 million.
The net impact of this assumption update on income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes of $206 million consisted of an increase in remeasurement of liability for future policy benefits of $14 million, a decrease in policyholders’ benefits of $13 million, an increase in change in market risk benefits and purchased market risk benefits of $204 million and an increase in interest credited to policyholder’s account balances of $1 million.
2025 Assumption Updates
The impact of our 2025 annual review on Non-GAAP Operating Earnings was favorable by $1 million before taking into consideration the tax impacts, or $1 million after tax.
The net impact of assumption changes on Non-GAAP Operating Earnings increased other income by $5 million, increased remeasurement of liability for future policy benefits by $5 million, and decreased policyholders’ benefits by $1 million. Non-GAAP Operating Earnings excludes items related to variable annuity product features, such as changes in the MRBs and purchased MRBs.
The net impact of assumption changes on Non-GAAP Operating Earnings increased other income by $13 million, increased remeasurement of liability for future policy benefits by $18 million,million and decreased policyholders’ benefits by $9 million. Non-GAAP Operating Earnings excludes items related to variable annuity product features, such as changes in the MRBs and purchased MRBs.
2022 Assumption Updates
The impact of our 2022 annual review on Non-GAAP Operating Earnings was unfavorable by $2 million before taking into consideration the tax impacts or $1 million after tax.
The net impact of assumption changes on Non-GAAP Operating Earnings increased remeasurement of liability for future policy benefits by $14 million, decreased policyholders’ benefits by $13 million and increased interest credited by to policyholder’s account balances by $1 million. Non-GAAP Operating Earnings excludes items related to variable annuity product features, such as changes in the MRBs and purchased MRBs.
As previously announced, we entered into a 15-year lease agreement in New York, NY at 1345 Avenue of the Americas which commenced in 2023 and will reduce rental expense beginning in 2024. We also realized expense efficiencies in office space leases as follows: in Syracuse, NY, we occupy space under a lease that was scheduled to expire in 2024, but which was amended to extend a portion of the space through 2028 at a lower total cost; and in Jersey City, NJ, we occupied space under a lease that expired in 2023 and was not extended or replaced.
As previously announced in 2018, AB established its corporate headquarters in Nashville, TN at 501 Commerce Street and began the process of transitioning Finance, IT, Operations, Legal, Compliance, Internal Audit, Human Capital, and Sales and Marketing functions. As of December 31, 2024, 1,063 employees were located in Nashville and AB has successfully completed the relocation of their corporate headquarters to Nashville, TN. AB will continue to operate a principal location in New York City, which houses Portfolio Management, Trading, and New York-based Wealth Management Private Wealth businesses. Beginning in 2025, as the transition period has now been completed, AB expects to realize an estimated $75 million of annual savings from a combination of lower occupancy and compensation-related expenses.
In addition to our results presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP, we report Non-GAAP Operating Earnings, Non-GAAP Operating ROE, and Non-GAAP operating common EPS, each of which is a measure that is not determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Management principally uses these Non-GAAP financial measures in evaluating performance because they present a clearer picture of our operating performance and they allow management to allocate resources. Similarly, management believes that the use of these Non-GAAP financial measures, together with relevant U.S. GAAP measures, provide investors with a better understanding of our results of operations and the underlying profitability drivers and trends of our business. These Non-GAAP financial measures are intended to remove from our results of operations the impact of market changes (where there is a mismatch in the valuation of assets and liabilities) as well as certain other expenses which are not part of our underlying profitability drivers or likely to re-occur in the foreseeable future, as such items fluctuate from period-to-period in a manner inconsistent with these drivers. These measures should be considered supplementary to our results that are presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP and should not be viewed as a substitute for the U.S. GAAP measures. Other companies may use similarly titled Non-GAAP financial measures that are calculated differently from the way we calculate such measures. Consequently, our Non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to similar measures used by other companies.
We also discuss certain operating measures, including AUM, AUA, AV, Protection Solutionspolicy reserves and certain other operating measures, which management believes provide useful information about our businesses and the operational factors underlying our financial performance.
•Other adjustments, which primarily include restructuring costs related to severance and separation, lease write-offs related to non-recurring restructuring activities, COVID-19 related impacts, net derivative gains (losses) on certain Non-GMxB derivatives, net investment income from certain items including consolidated VIE investments, seed capital mark-to-market adjustments, unrealized gain/losses and realized capital gains/losses from sales or disposals of select securities, certain legal accruals; a bespoke deal to repurchase UL policies from one entity that had invested in numerous policies purchased in the life settlement market, which disposed of the risk of additional COI litigation by that entity related to those UL policies, impact of the annual actuarial assumption updates attributable to LFPB when the majority of the impact relates to the non-core business; and
In the third quarter of 2025, the Company updated its net investment income segment reporting to better align with our GAAP segments, as well as the reporting of our spread lending programs' income and expenses. Previously, direct and allocated segment NII were recorded based on assets tied to statutory asset tagging and net statutory liabilities for allocation. To better align with our GAAP segments, the Company changed the recording methodology for direct NII. It is now based on the book yields of assets tied to specific segments, considering general account values plus reserves, net of embedded derivatives. Indirect NII, which was previously allocated based on net statutory liabilities, is now allocated based on general account values and reserves, net of embedded derivatives. Additionally, revenues and expenses from our spread lending programs are now primarily recorded within the Retirement segment. Previously, spread lending revenues and expenses were recorded in Corporate and Other, with the excess of revenues over expenses allocated to the insurance segments based on net statutory liabilities. Prior periods have been revised to reflect these changes.
In the fourth quarter of 2023, the Company updated its operating earnings measure to exclude the impact of realized amounts related to equity classified instruments. The recognition of the realized capital gains and losses from investments in current net investment income is generally considered distortive and not reflective of the ongoing core business activities of the segments. The presentation of operating earnings in prior periods was not revised to reflect this modification. The impact to operating earnings was immaterial for the year ended December 31, 2023.
In the first quarter of 2024, the we began allocating to our business segments collateral expense resulting from a designated rate to be paid on the collateral held back to counterparties. The new segment allocation methodology for collateral expense is based on the income earned on cash equivalents held in the surplus segments and income earned in portfolios backing collateral expenses, such that the collateral expense would be allocated to the segments up to that amount. Any remaining amount is included within Corporate and Other. This expense was previously recorded in Corporate and Other with no allocation to our business segments in prior reporting periods.
The presentation of operating earnings in prior periods was not revised to reflect this modification, however, we estimated that allocating collateral expense to the segments for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, would have resulted in a decrease to operating earnings of $4.0 million and $0.8 million for Individual Retirement, $7.7 million and $1.4 million for Group Retirement, $21.9 million and $2.5 million for Protection Solutions, $4.2 million and $1.0 million for Legacy, and an increase of $37.8 million and $5.7 million for Corporate and Other. Our total operating earnings were not impacted.
During the third quarter 2024, we moved revenues and expenses related to payout annuitizations from the Legacy segment to the Individual Retirement segment. Now all payout annuities will be reported within the Individual Retirement segment as the block is managed on an aggregate basis. Prior periods have been recast to reflect this change.
(1)As a result of the novation of certain Legacy VA policies completed during the first quarter of 2025, the Company recorded a loss of $499 million in pre-tax net income and an increase of $263 million in pre-tax AOCI, for a total impact loss of $236 million for the year ended December 31, 2025.
(2)Includes $1.1 billion as a result of assets transferred related to the reinsurance transaction with RGA for the year ended December 31, 2025.
(3)Includes a gain of $304 million on Non-VA derivatives for the year ended December 31, 2025. Also includes $6 million of expense related to a disputed billing practice of an AB third-party service provider for the year ended December 31, 2025 and certain gross legal expenses related to the COI litigation of $106 million and $144 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
(1)Includes the impact of favorable assumption updates of $16 million and $40 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Includes the impact of unfavorable assumption updates of $204 million for the year ended December 31, 2022.
(2)Includes certain gross legal expenses related to the COI litigation of $106 million, $144 million and $218 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Includes the impact of annual actuarial assumptions updates related to LFPB of $61 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. Prior period impact was immaterial and was not revised.
(45)For the year ended December 31, 2024, includes $78 million contingent payment gain recognized inrelated connection withto a fair value remeasurement of the contingent payment liability associated with AB's acquisition of CarVal in 2022.
(56)For the and 2023, respectively, non-recurringNon-recurring tax items primarily reflect primarily the effect of uncertain tax positions for a given audit period. IncludeIncludes a decrease of the deferred tax valuation allowance of $1.0 billion during year ended December 31, 2023.
(7)This measure is a Non-GAAP financial measure. For an explanation of our use of Non-GAAP financial measures, refer to the “Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” and "Glossary of Selected Financial and Product Terms" sections of this document. For a reconciliation of this item to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, refer to the “Non-GAAP Reconciliation” section in this document.
(6) Includes Non-GMxB related derivative hedge losses (gains) of $6 million, $26 million and ($34) million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
(1)As a result of the novation of certain Legacy VA policies completed during the first quarter of 2025, the Company recorded a loss of $1.67 for the year ended December 31, 2025.
(2)Includes $3.84 as a result of assets transferred related to the reinsurance transaction with RGA for the year ended December 31, 2025.
(3)Includes a gain of $1.02 on Non-VA derivatives for the year ended December 31, 2025. Also includes $0.02 of expense related to a disputed billing practice of an AB third-party service provider for the year ended December 31, 2025 and certain gross legal expenses related to the COI litigation of $0.33 and $0.41 for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
(1)Includes the impact of favorable assumption updates of $0.05 and $0.11 for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Includes the impact of unfavorable assumption updates of $0.54 for the year ended December 31, 2022.
(2)Includes certain gross legal expenses related to the COI litigation of $0.33, $0.41 and $0.57 for the year ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Includes the impact of unfavorable annual actuarial assumptions updates related to LFPB of $0.17 for the year ended December 31, 2023. Includes policyholder benefit costs of $0.20 for the year ended December 31, 2022 stemming from a deal to repurchase UL policies from one entity that had invested in numerous policies purchased in the life settlement market.
(56)For the 2023, respectively, non-recurringNon-recurring tax items primarily reflect primarily the effect of uncertain tax positions for a given audit period. IncludeIncludes a decrease of the deferred tax valuation allowance of $2.84 per common share during year ended December 31, 2023.
(7)This measure is a Non-GAAP financial measure. For an explanation of our use of Non-GAAP financial measures, refer to the “Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” and "Glossary of Selected Financial and Product Terms" sections of this document. For a reconciliation of this item to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, refer to the “Non-GAAP Reconciliation” section in this document.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the risks described in the “Risk Factors” section included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. Risks to which we are subject also include, but are not limited to, the factors mentioned under “Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Information” above and the risks of our businesses described elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Removed heading “The completion of the Proposed Transaction is subject to a number of conditions, including stockholder approvals, and, if these conditions are not satisfied or waived, the Proposed Transaction may not be completed within the expected timeframe or at all.”
Removed heading “While the Proposed Transaction is pending, we will be subject to business uncertainties.”
Removed heading “Litigation filed in connection with the Proposed Transaction could prevent or delay the consummation of the Proposed Transaction or result in the payment of damages following completion of the Proposed Transaction.”
Removed heading “Failure to complete the Proposed Transaction could adversely affect us, including in the event we are required to pay a termination fee.”
Largest changes
“Litigation filed in connection with the Proposed Transaction could prevent or delay the consummation of the Proposed Transaction or result in the payment of damages following completion of the Proposed Transaction.”see in full comparison
“The completion of the Proposed Transaction is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, including: (a) the approval of the Merger Agreement by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Corebridge common stock entitled to vote thereon at the Corebridge special meeting; (b) the approval of the Merger Agreement by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Equitable common stock entitled to vote thereon at the Equitable special meeting; …”see in full comparison
“The completion of the Proposed Transaction is subject to a number of conditions, including stockholder approvals, and, if these conditions are not satisfied or waived, the Proposed Transaction may not be completed within the expected timeframe or at all.”see in full comparison
“Failure to complete the Proposed Transaction could adversely affect us, including in the event we are required to pay a termination fee.”see in full comparison
“While the Proposed Transaction is pending, we will be subject to business uncertainties.”see in full comparison
“Lawsuits in connection with the Proposed Transaction may be filed against us, Corebridge, any other party and each party’s respective directors and officers, which could prevent or delay the consummation of the Proposed Transaction, divert management’s attention and resources, and result in additional costs to us. The ultimate resolution of any lawsuits is uncertain, and an adverse ruling in any such lawsuit may cause the Proposed Transaction to be delayed or not to be completed, which could cause us not to realize some or all of the anticipated benefits of the Proposed Transaction. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (21)
You should carefully consider the risks described in the “Risk Factors” section included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-K.10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. Risks to which we are subject also include, but are not limited to, the factors mentioned under “Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Information” above and the risks of our businesses described elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The following should be read in conjunction with and supplements and amends the section titled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The completion of the Proposed Transaction is subject to a number of conditions, including stockholder approvals, and, if these conditions are not satisfied or waived, the Proposed Transaction may not be completed within the expected timeframe or at all.
The completion of the Proposed Transaction is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, including: (a) the approval of the Merger Agreement by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Corebridge common stock entitled to vote thereon at the Corebridge special meeting; (b) the approval of the Merger Agreement by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Equitable common stock entitled to vote thereon at the Equitable special meeting; (c) the approval for listing on the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance, of shares of Corebridge HoldCo common stock, Series 1-A Corebridge HoldCo preferred stock and Series 1-C Corebridge HoldCo preferred stock issuable in accordance with the Merger Agreement; (d) the receipt of requisite regulatory approvals or clearances, including the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, approvals from insurance regulators in Arizona, Colorado, Missouri, New York, Texas and Vermont, and approvals of certain other domestic and foreign regulators; (e) the absence of governmental restraints or prohibitions preventing the consummation of the Proposed Transaction; (f) the SEC having declared the registration statement on Form S-4 with respect to the stock consideration being issued in the Proposed Transaction effective under the Securities Act, and the absence of any stop order or proceeding by the SEC suspending such effectiveness, unless subsequently withdrawn; (g) the receipt by each party of a tax opinion, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to such party, providing that the Proposed Transaction will qualify as a transaction described in Section 351 of the Internal Revenue Code; and (h) the consent of our clients representing 75% of our annualized investment advisory, investment management, subadvisory and other similar recurring fees as of February 28, 2026 to the “assignment” (as defined in the Investment Advisers Act of 1940) of their advisory contracts.
The obligation of each of us and Corebridge to consummate the Proposed Transaction is also conditioned on, among other things, (x) the truth and correctness of the representations and warranties made by the other party as of the closing date (subject to certain “materiality” and “material adverse effect” qualifiers), (y) each of us, Corebridge HoldCo, Corebridge Merger Sub and Equitable Merger Sub having performed or complied in all material respects with the obligations required to be performed or complied with by it under the Merger Agreement at or prior to the Closing and (z) no “material adverse effect” having occurred with respect to either us or Corebridge that is continuing.
There can be no assurance that the conditions to the completion of the Proposed Transaction will be satisfied or waived on a timely basis or at all. In addition, no assurance can be given as to the terms, conditions and timing of any approvals or clearances. Any delay in completing the Proposed Transaction could cause us not to realize, or to be delayed in realizing, some or all of the benefits that we expect to achieve in the Proposed Transaction. If the conditions to the completion of the Proposed Transaction are not satisfied or waived, the Proposed Transaction may not be completed within the expected timeframe or at all.
While the Proposed Transaction is pending, we will be subject to business uncertainties.
The Proposed Transaction will happen only if the stated conditions are satisfied or waived, including, among others, the approval of the Proposed Transaction by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Corebridge common stock entitled to vote thereon at the Corebridge special meeting and the approval of the Proposed Transaction by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Equitable common stock entitled to vote thereon at the Equitable special meeting.
Many of the conditions are outside our control, and both we and Corebridge have certain rights to terminate the Merger Agreement. Uncertainty regarding the outcome of the Proposed Transaction or our prospects could disrupt our business relationships with our customers, distributors, vendors, landlords and other strategic or business partners, who may attempt to negotiate changes to existing business relationships, consider entering into business relationships with parties other than us or seek to delay or defer entering into contracts or other commercial arrangements with us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, regardless of whether the Proposed Transaction is ultimately completed. Such uncertainty could also adversely affect our ability to recruit and retain key personnel and other employees.
The Merger Agreement also contains pre-closing covenants that require us to conduct our business in all material respects in the ordinary course of business, and restricts what we can do prior to completion of the Proposed Transaction, including, during the pendency of the Proposed Transaction, our ability to pursue strategic transactions, undertake certain significant financing transactions and other actions, even if such actions would prove beneficial and may cause us to forgo certain opportunities we might otherwise pursue.
We have expended, and continue to expend, significant management time and resources in an effort to complete the Proposed Transaction, which may have a negative impact on our ongoing business and operations.
Litigation filed in connection with the Proposed Transaction could prevent or delay the consummation of the Proposed Transaction or result in the payment of damages following completion of the Proposed Transaction.
Lawsuits in connection with the Proposed Transaction may be filed against us, Corebridge, any other party and each party’s respective directors and officers, which could prevent or delay the consummation of the Proposed Transaction, divert management’s attention and resources, and result in additional costs to us. The ultimate resolution of any lawsuits is uncertain, and an adverse ruling in any such lawsuit may cause the Proposed Transaction to be delayed or not to be completed, which could cause us not to realize some or all of the anticipated benefits of the Proposed Transaction. The defense or settlement of any lawsuit or claim that remains unresolved at the time the Proposed Transaction are consummated may adversely affect Corebridge HoldCo’s business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Failure to complete the Proposed Transaction could adversely affect us, including in the event we are required to pay a termination fee.
We may terminate the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, including, among others, if the Proposed Transaction is not completed by December 26, 2026 (subject to two automatic three-month extensions in certain circumstances, pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement). In addition, the Merger Agreement provides for the payment by Corebridge to us, or vice versa, of a termination fee of $475,000,000 under specified circumstances.
If we are required to pay the termination fee, we may be required to use cash that would have otherwise been available for general corporate purposes or other uses, which may materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
If the Proposed Transaction is not completed for any reason, our ongoing business may be adversely affected and will be subject to certain risks, including, among others, the following:
•the market price of our common stock (which may reflect a market assumption that the Proposed Transaction will be completed) may decline, or we may experience other negative reactions from the financial markets;
•we will have incurred, and may continue to incur, significant expenses for professional services and other transaction costs in connection with the Proposed Transaction for which we will have received little or no benefit if the Proposed Transaction are not completed;
•we may experience negative reactions from our business partners, regulators and employees;
•failure to complete the Proposed Transaction may result in negative publicity or result in a negative impression of us in the investment community and with policyholders and other stakeholders; and
•matters relating to the Proposed Transaction require substantial commitments of time and resources by our management, which would otherwise have been devoted to day-to-day operations and other opportunities that may have been beneficial to us as an independent company.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Non-GAAP Operating Earnings”
New heading “Non-GAAP Operating Earnings”
New heading “Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”
New heading “Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Holdings”
New heading “Non-GAAP Operating Earnings”
New heading “Six Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025, for the Retirement Segment”
New heading “Net Flows and AV”
New heading “Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 for the Asset Management Segment”
New heading “Long-Term Net Flows and AUM”
New heading “Net Flows and AV”
New heading “Six Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025, for the Wealth Management Segment”
New heading “Six Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025, for Corporate and Other”
New heading “Operating earnings (losses)”
Removed heading “Assets Under Management”
Removed heading “Operating earnings”
Removed heading “Operating earnings”
Removed heading “Operating earnings”
Largest changes
“The NAIC’s Big Data and Artificial Intelligence (H) Working Group is evaluating AI-use outcomes and how well the current regulatory framework addresses potential harms from the use of AI. The goal is to develop an overall AI regulatory framework that could be incorporated into an NAIC regulatory handbook. For example, the working group aims to finalize during 2026, a tool to collect information about an insurer’s use of AI during an examination or investigation.”see in full comparison
“Six Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025, for the Wealth Management Segment”see in full comparison
“Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 for the Asset Management Segment”see in full comparison
“Six Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025, for the Retirement Segment”see in full comparison
“Six Months Ended June 30, 2026, Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025, for Corporate and Other”see in full comparison
“Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (191)
On July 30, 2026, stockholders of both Holdings and Corebridge voted to approve all stockholder proposals necessary to complete the Proposed Transaction at their respective special stockholder meetings. The Proposed Transaction is expected to close by the end of 2026, subject to customary closing conditions, including the receipt of required regulatory approvals and approval of the respective shareholders of both Corebridge and Holdings.approvals.
U.S. equity markets werestaged volatilea strong reversal in the firstsecond quarter of 2026, with the S&P 500 Index decliningreturning 4.3%,approximately 15%, its best quarterly performance since the 2020 post-pandemic rebound, while small-cap stocks proved more resilient as the Russell 2000 returnedsurged 0.9%.more than 21% for its strongest quarter in decades. A wide variety of factors continue to cause market volatility and heighten concerns regarding inflation. These factors include, among others, concerns around private credit, interest rate changes,AI-relatedchanges, AI-related concerns, and escalating geopolitical tensions, including increased tariffs and other trade restrictions and barriers, high fuel and energy costs, ongoing economic disruption, and other factors, including the effects of the partial U.S. federal government shutdown, the Ukraine-Russia conflict,conflict and conflict in the Middle East. For further information on the risk of increased volatility in the financial markets to our business, see “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Conditions in the Financial Markets and Economy—Conditions in the global capital markets and the economy and Equity market declines and volatility” in the 2025 Form 10-K.
In November 2024, the NAIC adopted an amendment to the Purposes and Procedures Manual thateffective January 1, 2026, which sets forth procedures for SVO staff to identify and evaluate a filing-exempt security with an NAIC Designation determined by a rating that appears to be an unreasonable assessment of investment risk. The procedures include, without limitation, sending an information request to insurers that hold the security under review and determining whether the NAIC Designation is three or more notches different from the SVO’s assessment, which would allow the SVO to request the removal of the credit rating from the filing exempt process. At any time during the process, an alternate credit rating may be requested and, if one is received, it will be incorporated into the filing exempt process. The PurposesNAIC has developed the technology enhancements necessary to carry out these procedures and Proceduresthis Manual amendmentprocess is schedulednow to become effective on January 1, 2026.operational.
In June 2023, the NAIC increased the RBC factor for structured security residual tranches from 30% to 45%, which became effective for year-end 2024 RBC filings. The NAIC has been assessing the RBC treatment of CLOs and in MarchJune 20262026, releasedthe anNAIC’s initialFinancial proposalCondition for(E) newCommittee adopted a proposal, which incorporates the American Academy of Actuaries’s model C-1 (asset risk) factors for CLOsCLOs, incollateralized bond obligations, and collateralized debt obligations into the lifeNAIC’s RBCLife formulaand toFraternal takeRisk-Based effectCapital Blanks, Instructions, and Formula, effective for year-end 2026.
The NAIC working groups areis considering various topics related to funding agreement-backed notes and similar programs,programs. includingAs apart proposalof currentlythis undereffort, considerationthe NAIC’s Statutory Accounting Principles (E) Working Group adopted revisions to provideSSAP regulatorsNo. with52 — Deposit-Type Contracts, effective year-end 2026, to require enhanced disclosures for funding agreements that support such programs.
Big Data
The NAIC’s Big Data and Artificial Intelligence (H) Working Group is evaluating AI-use outcomes and how well the current regulatory framework addresses potential harms from the use of AI. The goal is to develop an overall AI regulatory framework that could be incorporated into an NAIC regulatory handbook. For example, the working group aims to finalize during 2026, a tool to collect information about an insurer’s use of AI during an examination or investigation.
Reinsurance
In August 2025, the NAIC adopted an actuarial guideline (“AG 55”) developed by the Life Actuarial (A) Task Force (“LATF”) that subjects certain post January 1, 2016 offshore reinsurance transactions to enhanced asset adequacy testing. The guideline requires asset adequacy testing for long-duration insurance business that relies heavily on asset returns (i.e., “asset-intensive reinsurance transactions”) within the scope of the guideline that either meet certain size-based thresholds or result in significant reinsurance collectability risk (as determined by the cedent’s appointed actuary). Such asset adequacy testing would be performed using a cash flow testing methodology. The actuarial guideline requires disclosure by the ceding insurer, meaning that it will not require that additional reserves be posted at the reinsurer level (although the ceding insurer may decide to post reserves). It is important to note that domestic regulators will continue to have the authority to take action on known issues, or issues that may become known as part of such new reporting, and may require additional analysis or reserves following such disclosure. The Company is preparing to comply with this new guideline, for which reporting will be required with respect to reserves reported as of December 31, 2025, in an insurer’s annual statement. In October 2025, LATF exposed for comment a revised filing template intended to assist ceding insurers in complying with AG 55.
On December 11, 2025, the NAIC adopted revisions to SSAP No.61—Life, Deposit-Type and Accident and Health Reinsurance which require combining reinsurance contracts that include both yearly renewable term and coinsurance portions to be evaluated for risk transfer on an overall basis (as well as for each component individually). The revisions are effective immediately for new and amended contracts, and subject to reporting on or before December 31, 2026 for existing contracts.
In May 2025, the NAIC’s Statutory Accounting Principles (E) Working Group (“SAPWG”) adopted revised annual statement reporting schedules for life insurers to require reporting entities to identify assets that are subject to a funds withheld or modified coinsurance (“modco”) arrangement in connection with reinsurance. In addition, SAPWG adopted revisions to SSAP No. 1–Accounting Policies, Risks & Uncertainties, and Other Disclosures, which expand restricted asset reporting to capture information on modco and funds withheld assets that are related to or affiliated with the reinsurer for disclosure in all quarterly and annual financial statements. The revisions are meant to capture everything affiliated with the reinsurer and the entire restricted asset disclosure will be required in all quarterly and annual financial statements. This update became effective for year-end 2025, with initial quarterly reporting required in the first quarter of 2026.
Various industry groups brought litigation against the DOL seeking to overturn the DOL Rule. On July 25, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a stay of the effective date of portions of the DOL Rule. On July 26, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a stay of the effective date of the DOL Rule as a whole. The DOL initially appealed the stays issued in these cases to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, but in early 2025, the court granted the DOL’s motion to pause proceedings while it reviewsreviewed its posture on these cases. On March 17, 2026, the Court issued an order vacating the 2024 DOL fiduciary rule package in its entirety. WithShortly thisthereafter, order,the DOL issued a regulation confirming that the pre-2024 versions of the definition of fiduciary investment advice, PTE 84-24, PTE 2020-02, and the other PTEs willPTE remain in effect going forward.effect.
Non-GAAP Operating Earnings
(1)As a result of the novation of certain Legacy VA policies completed during the first quarter of 2025, the Company recorded a loss of $499 million in pre-tax net income and an increase of $263 million in pre-tax AOCI, for a total impact loss of $236 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.
(2)Includes the following impacts on Non-VA derivatives: a gain of $198 million and $33 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, respectively; a loss of $176 million and $322 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, respectively. Also includes $14 million of expense related to a disputed billing practice of an AB third-party service provider for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, respectively.
(2)Includes a loss of $146 million and $165 million on Non-VA derivatives for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
(3)For the three months ended March 31, 2025, includes $82 million of the gain on sale on AB's Bernstein Research Service attributable to Holdings.
(4)For the three months ended March 31, 2025, includes $78 million contingent payment gain recognized related to a fair value remeasurement of the contingent payment liability associated with AB's acquisition of CarVal in 2022.
(1)As a result of the novation of certain Legacy VA policies completed during the first quarter of 2025, the Company recorded aan lossimpact per common shares of $1.60$1.63 for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.
(2)Includes the following impacts on Non-VA derivatives: a gain of $0.65 and $0.11 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, respectively; a loss of $0.63 and $1.14 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, respectively. Also includes $0.05 of expense related to a disputed billing practice of an AB third-party service provider for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, respectively.
(2)Includes a loss of $0.51 and $0.53 on Non-VA derivatives for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
(3)For the three months ended March 31, 2025, includes $0.25 of the gain on sale on AB's Bernstein Research Service attributable to Holdings.
(4)For the three months ended March 31, 2025 includes $0.24 contingent payment gain recognized in connection with a fair value remeasurement of the contingent payment liability associated with AB's acquisition of CarVal in 2022.
Assets Under Management
Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 Compared to the Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025
Net incomeloss attributable to Holdings increased $558$104 million to $621$453 million duringfor the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026,2026 from $63$349 million in the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The following notable items were notablethe changesprimary drivers for the change in net income (loss):
Unfavorable items included:
•Compensation, benefits, interest and other operating expenses decreased by $517 million mainly due to the Venerable novation loss recorded in the prior year.
•Policyholders’ benefits decreased by $374 million primarily due to the reinsurance transaction with RGA.
•Change in market risk benefits and purchased market risk benefits decreased by $347 million mainly due to an increase in interest rates in the first quarter of 2026 compared to a decrease in interest rates in 2025.
•Net investment income increased by $36 million mainly due to higher average asset balances, partially offset by the reinsurance transaction with RGA.
•Net derivative gainslosses decreasedincreased $219by $681 million primarilymainly drivendue byto a largerhigher equity market declineappreciation during the second quarter 2026 compared to the second quarter 2025.
•Fee-type revenue decreased by $148 million mainly driven by the reinsurance transaction with RGA, partially offset by higher advisory fee-type revenue in our Asset Management and Wealth Management segments.
•Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances increased by $92 million mainly due to growth of account values in our Retirement segment, partially offset by the reinsurance transaction with RGA.
•Commissions and distribution-related payments increased by $55$74 million mainly due to higher distribution and advisory fee-type revenue from higher retirement sales and average asset balances in our Wealth Management segment, and higher asset-based commissions and sales volumes in our Retirement segment.commissions.
•Fee-type revenue decreased by $71 million mainly due to the reinsurance transaction with RGA, partially offset by higher advisory fee-type revenue and higher Separate Account values.
•Compensation, benefits, interest and other operating expenses increased by $42 million mainly due to higher incentive compensation in our Asset Management segment.
•Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances increased by $38 million mainly due to growth of account values in our Retirement segment, partially offset by the reinsurance transaction with RGA.
•Investment losses increased by $15 million primarily due to fixed maturity and mortgage valuation and impairment losses.
•Income tax expense increased by $132 million primarily due to higher pre-tax earnings as well as a higher effective tax rate.
•Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest increased by $23$34 million mainly due to anincreased increasegains infrom averageconsolidated economic ownership of AB, partially offset by higher pre-tax earnings.VIEs.
These were partially offset by the following favorable items:
•Change in market risk benefits and purchased market risk benefits decreased by $395 million mainly due to higher equity market appreciation during the second quarter 2026 compared to the second quarter 2025.
•Policyholders’ benefits decreased by $352 million mainly due to the reinsurance transaction with RGA.
•Net investment income increased by $42 million mainly due to higher average asset balances, partially offset by the reinsurance transaction with RGA and lower income from Alternative investments.
•Income tax benefit increased by $60 million primarily due to a higher pre-tax loss for the three months ended June 30, 2026.
Non-GAAP Operating Earnings
Non-GAAP Operating Earnings increased by $136 million to $488 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 from $352 million in the three months ended June 30, 2025. The following notable items were the primary drivers for the change in Non-GAAP Operating Earnings:
•Policyholders’ benefits decreased by $352 million mainly due to the reinsurance transaction with RGA.
•Commissions and distribution-related payments increased by $74 million mainly due to higher retirement sales and asset-based commissions.
•Fee-type revenue decreased by $55 million mainly due to the reinsurance transaction with RGA, partially offset by higher advisory fee-type revenue and higher Separate Account values.
•Compensation, benefits, interest and other operating expenses increased by $28 million mainly due to higher incentive compensation in our Asset Management segment.
•Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances increased by $23 million mainly due to growth of account values in our Retirement segment, partially offset by the reinsurance transaction with RGA.
•Amortization of DAC increased by $21 million mainly due to growth in our Retirement segment from sales momentum.
•Net investment income decreased by $10 million mainly due to lower gains from seed capital investments in our Asset Management segment.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Holdings
Net income attributable to Holdings increased $454 million to $168 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026, from a $286 million net loss in the six months ended June 30, 2025. The following were notable changes in net income (loss):
•Change in market risk benefits and purchased market risk benefits decreased by $742 million mainly due to higher equity market appreciation and an increase in interest rates in the first six months of 2026 compared to lower equity market appreciation and a decrease in interest rates in the first six months of 2025.
•Policyholders’ benefits decreased by $726 million primarily due to the reinsurance transaction with RGA.
EQH insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 1 Form 4 filing (1 insider, 12 trade dates, 1,144 shares, about $45.9K) and open-market sales in 23 filings (8 insiders, 17 trade dates, 295,181 shares, about $13.4M; 12 of these filings say the sales were made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan). Net open-market shares: -294,037 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$13.4M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-21 | Scott Bertram L |
Open-market sale | 2,780 | $54.35 | $151.1K |
| 2026-09-17 | Mackay Craig C |
Open-market sale | 2,000 | $54.28 | $108.6K |
| 2026-09-04 | Lane Nick |
Open-market sale | 14,923 | $53.24 | $794.5K |
| 2026-09-04 | Isaacs-Lowe Arlene |
Open-market sale | 1,000 | $52.83 | $52.8K |
| 2026-08-17 | Hurd Jeffrey J |
Open-market sale |
2,241 | $52.50 | $117.7K |
| 2026-08-17 | Hurd Jeffrey J |
Open-market sale |
300 | $53.06 | $15.9K |
| 2026-08-17 | Hurd Jeffrey J |
Open-market sale |
2,459 | $51.39 | $126.4K |
| 2026-08-17 | Hurd Jeffrey J |
Open-market sale |
500 | $53.05 | $26.5K |
| 2026-08-17 | Hurd Jeffrey J |
Open-market sale |
4,200 | $52.51 | $220.5K |
| 2026-08-17 | Hurd Jeffrey J |
Open-market sale |
4,659 | $51.39 | $239.4K |
| 2026-08-17 | Hurd Jeffrey J |
Option exercise |
9,359 | $21.34 | $199.7K |
| 2026-08-11 | Mackay Craig C |
Open-market sale | 2,200 | $51.37 | $113.0K |
| 2026-08-10 | Pearson Mark |
Grant/award | 1,359 | — | — |
| 2026-08-10 | Raju Robin M |
Grant/award | 320 | — | — |
| 2026-08-10 | Eckert William James Iv |
Grant/award | 48 | — | — |
| 2026-08-10 | Hurd Jeffrey J |
Grant/award | 272 | — | — |
| 2026-08-10 | Lane Nick |
Grant/award | 314 | — | — |
| 2026-08-10 | Bernstein Seth P |
Grant/award | 104 | — | — |
| 2026-08-10 | Meyers Kurt |
Grant/award | 197 | — | — |
| 2026-08-10 | Eckert William James Iv |
Open-market sale | 947 | $52.88 | $50.1K |
| 2026-08-06 | Stonehill Charles G.t. |
Open-market sale | 7,500 | $51.54 | $386.6K |
| 2026-08-06 | Scott Bertram L |
Open-market sale | 1,466 | $51.15 | $75.0K |
| 2026-07-20 | Pearson Mark |
Option exercise |
27,200 | $23.18 | $630.5K |
| 2026-07-20 | Pearson Mark |
Open-market sale |
136 | $49.19 | $6.7K |
| 2026-07-20 | Pearson Mark |
Open-market sale |
39,564 | $48.54 | $1.9M |
| 2026-07-15 | Hurd Jeffrey J |
Open-market sale |
800 | $48.02 | $38.4K |
| 2026-07-15 | Hurd Jeffrey J |
Open-market sale |
4,200 | $49.03 | $205.9K |
| 2026-07-15 | Hurd Jeffrey J |
Option exercise |
9,358 | $21.34 | $199.7K |
| 2026-07-15 | Hurd Jeffrey J |
Open-market sale |
1,400 | $48.01 | $67.2K |
| 2026-07-15 | Hurd Jeffrey J |
Open-market sale |
7,958 | $49.01 | $390.0K |
| 2026-06-18 | Pearson Mark |
Option exercise |
27,200 | $23.18 | $630.5K |
| 2026-06-18 | Pearson Mark |
Open-market sale |
39,700 | $45.29 | $1.8M |
| 2026-06-15 | Hurd Jeffrey J |
Open-market sale |
9,358 | $45.11 | $422.1K |
| 2026-06-15 | Hurd Jeffrey J |
Option exercise |
9,358 | $21.34 | $199.7K |
| 2026-06-15 | Hurd Jeffrey J |
Open-market sale |
5,000 | $45.11 | $225.6K |
| 2026-06-10 | Eckert William James Iv |
Open-market sale | 6,200 | $41.83 | $259.3K |
| 2026-06-08 | Meyers Kurt |
Grant/award | 250 | — | — |
| 2026-06-08 | Raju Robin M |
Grant/award | 406 | — | — |
| 2026-06-08 | Bernstein Seth P |
Grant/award | 131 | — | — |
| 2026-06-08 | Lane Nick |
Grant/award | 398 | — | — |
| 2026-06-08 | Hurd Jeffrey J |
Grant/award | 344 | — | — |
| 2026-06-08 | Pearson Mark |
Grant/award | 1,719 | — | — |
| 2026-06-08 | Eckert William James Iv |
Grant/award | 61 | — | — |
| 2026-06-04 | Scott Bertram L |
Open-market sale | 2,470 | $41.08 | $101.5K |
| 2026-05-20 | Hondal Francis |
Grant/award | 4,400 | $42.05 | $185.0K |
| 2026-05-20 | Stansfield George |
Grant/award | 4,400 | $42.05 | $185.0K |
| 2026-05-20 | Dachille Douglas A. |
Grant/award | 4,400 | $42.05 | $185.0K |
| 2026-05-20 | Kaye Daniel G |
Grant/award | 4,400 | $42.05 | $185.0K |
| 2026-05-20 | Stonehill Charles G.t. |
Grant/award | 4,400 | $42.05 | $185.0K |
| 2026-05-20 | Scott Bertram L |
Grant/award | 4,400 | $42.05 | $185.0K |
| 2026-05-20 | Mackay Craig C |
Grant/award | 4,400 | $42.05 | $185.0K |
| 2026-05-20 | Lammtennant Joan M |
Grant/award | 6,897 | $42.05 | $290.0K |
| 2026-05-20 | Isaacs-Lowe Arlene |
Grant/award | 4,400 | $42.05 | $185.0K |
| 2026-05-18 | Pearson Mark |
Option exercise |
27,200 | $23.18 | $630.5K |
| 2026-05-18 | Pearson Mark |
Open-market sale |
39,700 | $42.60 | $1.7M |
| 2026-05-15 | Eckert William James Iv |
Open-market sale | 7,300 | $42.49 | $310.2K |
| 2026-05-15 | Lane Nick |
Option exercise |
4,417 | $23.18 | $102.4K |
| 2026-05-15 | Lane Nick |
Open-market sale |
4,417 | $42.45 | $187.5K |
| 2026-05-15 | Hurd Jeffrey J |
Open-market sale |
9,358 | $42.44 | $397.2K |
| 2026-05-15 | Hurd Jeffrey J |
Open-market sale |
5,000 | $42.45 | $212.2K |
Well-known investors holding EQH (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harris Associates (Oakmark Funds) | 2026-06-30 | 9,489,037 | $416.4M | 0.55% | Added 33495% |
| Viking Global Investors (Andreas Halvorsen) | 2026-06-30 | 5,398,896 | $236.9M | 0.68% | New position |
| D. E. Shaw & Co. | 2026-06-30 | 2,034,078 | $89.3M | 0.06% | Reduced 8% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 1,379,294 | $60.5M | 0.03% | Reduced 56% |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 819,900 | $36.0M | 0.05% | New position |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 611,226 | $26.8M | 0.02% | Reduced 76% |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 372,563 | $16.3M | 0.02% | Added 13% |
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 337,278 | $14.8M | 0.01% | Reduced 67% |
| Bridgewater Associates | 2026-06-30 | 261,023 | $11.5M | 0.05% | Reduced 43% |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 210,911 | $9.3M | 0.01% | Added 232% |
| Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb (Sequoia Fund) | 2026-06-30 | 40,310 | $1.8M | 0.03% | No change |