Companies › EZBC

EZBC 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

Franklin Templeton Digital Holdings Trust · CBOE · Commodity Contracts Brokers & Dealers · CIK 1992870 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from Franklin Templeton Digital Holdings Trust's public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

53 / 18risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
10new risk-factor headings
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-06-29 (period ending 2026-03-31) with 10-K filed 2025-06-30 (period ending 2025-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

53new paragraphs
18removed paragraphs
125reworded paragraphs
39,443 → 44,495words in section

New heading “Summary Risk Factors”

New heading “Risk Factors Related to the Regulation of the Fund and the Shares”

New heading “Disruptions or other problems in the supply chain for bitcoin mining hardware and difficulties in obtaining new hardware could cause harm to the Bitcoin network.”

New heading “Digital asset treasury companies may exacerbate volatility in digital asset markets.”

New heading “Operational cost may exceed the award for mining transaction, and increased transaction fees may adversely affect the usage of the Bitcoin network.”

New heading “The SEC has approved generic listing standards for commodity-based trust shares and may approve other applications under Rule 19b-4 of the Exchange Act to list competing digital asset backet investment vehicles as exchange-traded products, which could reduce demand for, and the price of, bitcoin and adversely impact the value of the Shares.”

New heading “The Fund will rely on the information and technology systems of the Custodians, Administrator, Trustee, Sponsor, Authorized Participants and/or their designees, Bitcoin Trading Counterparties, listing exchange, and the Fund’s other service providers and counterparties (referred to herein as the “Service Providers”), each of which could be directly or indirectly adversely affected by information systems interruptions, cybersecurity incidents or other disruptions, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on the Fund.”

New heading “An investment in the Shares may deviate bitcoin prices in spot markets and is distinct from a direct investment in bitcoin.”

New heading “Certain Shareholders may from time to time own a substantial amount of the Fund’s Shares.”

New heading “The Fund is subject to certain risks due to its concentration in only bitcoin.”

Removed heading “The limited ability to facilitate in-kind creations and redemptions of Shares could have adverse consequences for the Fund.”

Removed heading “Intellectual property rights claims may adversely affect the Fund and the value of the Shares.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: wells notice, litigation, penalt
“On March 22, 2023, the Prime Broker and its parent (such parent, “Coinbase Global” and together with Coinbase Inc., the “Relevant Coinbase Entities”) received a “Wells Notice” from the SEC staff stating that the SEC staff made a “preliminary determination” to recommend that the SEC file an enforcement action against the Relevant Coinbase Entities alleging violations of the federal securities laws, including the Exchange Act and the Securities Act. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: default, litigation, breach
“Similarly, if an Authorized Participant or a Bitcoin Trading Counterparty suffers insolvency, business failure or interruption, default, failure to perform, security breach, or in certain circumstances a force majeure event or if an Authorized Participant or a Bitcoin Trading Counterparty chooses not to participate in the creation and redemption process of the Fund, and the Fund is unable to engage replacement Authorized Participants or Bitcoin Trading Counterparties or access alternative services on commercially acceptable terms or at all, then the creation and redemption process of the …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: default, tariff, china
“There are a small number of major suppliers of bitcoin mining hardware globally, and a significant amount of bitcoin mining hardware manufacturing is located in China. Mining hardware manufacturers may fail to supply the mining hardware due to their inability to manufacture sufficient mining hardware, whether due to shortages of components or resources such as semiconductors, or changes of laws and trade restrictions (including export/import restrictions, quotas or tariffs), or due to insolvency, or non-performance or default on their contracts. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: default, tariff, china
“There are a small number of major suppliers of bitcoin mining hardware globally, and a significant amount of bitcoin mining hardware manufacturing is located in China. Mining hardware manufacturers may fail to supply the mining hardware due to their inability to manufacture sufficient mining hardware, whether due to shortages of components or resources such as semiconductors, or due to default, insolvency, or changes of laws and trade restrictions (including export/import restrictions, quotas or tariffs). …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: fine, penalt, cybersecurity incident
“Cybersecurity incidents may cause disruptions and impact business operations. They may result in any of the following: financial losses (including loss or theft of Fund assets), interference with the Fund’s ability to calculate its NAV, disclosure of confidential information, impediments to trading, submission of erroneous trades or erroneous creation or redemption orders or other price movements, the inability of the Fund or the Service Providers to transact business, violations of applicable privacy and other laws, regulatory fines, penalties, reputational damage, reimbursement or other …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: subpoena, investigation
“In March 2018, it was reported that the SEC was examining as many as 100 investment funds with strategies focused on digital assets. The reported focus of the examinations is on the accuracy of risk disclosures to investors in these funds, digital asset pricing practices, and compliance with rules meant to prevent the theft of investor funds, as well as on information gathering so that the SEC can better understand new technologies and investment products. It has further been reported that some of these funds received subpoenas from the SEC’s Enforcement Division. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (196)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Added

Summary Risk Factors

Added

Disruptions or other problems in the supply chain for bitcoin mining hardware and difficulties in obtaining new hardware could cause harm to the Bitcoin network.

Removed

The Fund’s timing in reaching the market and fee structure relative to other competitor bitcoin products could have a detrimental effect on the scale and sustainability of the Fund.

Reworded

The liquidity of the Shares may also be affected by the withdrawal from participation of Authorized Participants.Participants and/or their designees or Bitcoin Trading Counterparties.

Added

The Fund will rely on the information and technology systems of the Service Providers (as defined below), each of which could be directly or indirectly adversely affected by information systems interruptions, cybersecurity incidents or other disruptions, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on the Fund.

Removed

Security threats to the Fund’s account at the Bitcoin Custodian could disrupt or halt Fund operations and result in a loss of Fund assets or damage to the reputation of the Fund, each of which could result in a reduction in the value of the Shares.

Reworded

If the Custodian Agreement, Prime Broker Agreement, Authorized Participant Agreement (asor definedBitcoin below)Trading Counterparty Agreement is terminated or the Bitcoin CustodianCustodian, Prime Broker, Authorized Participant, or Bitcoin Trading Counterparty fails to provide services as required, the Sponsor may need to find and appoint a replacement custodian, prime broker, authorized participant or trading counterparty, which could pose a challenge to the safekeeping of the Fund’s bitcoins, and the Fund’s ability to continue to operate may be adversely affected.

Added

Risk Factors Related to the Regulation of the Fund and the Shares

Reworded

Risk Factors Related to the Regulation of the Fund and the Shares Digital asset markets in the U.S. exist in a state of regulatory uncertainty, and adverse legislative or regulatory developments could significantly harm the value of bitcoin or the Shares, such as by banning, restricting or imposing onerous conditions or prohibitions on the use of bitcoins, mining activity, digital wallets, the provision of services related to trading and custodying bitcoin, the operation of the Bitcoin network, or the digital asset markets generally.

Added

If regulators or public utilities take actions that restrict or otherwise impact mining activities, there may be a significant decline in such activities, which could adversely affect the Bitcoin network and the value of the Shares.

Reworded

If regulators subject Bitcoin Trading Counterparties, the FundFund, or the Sponsor to regulation as a money services business (“MSB”) or money transmitter, this could result in extraordinary expenses to Bitcoin Trading Counterparties, the FundFund, or the Sponsor and also result in decreased liquidity for the Shares.

Reworded

The treatment of digital currencyassets for U.S. federal, state and local income tax purposes is uncertain.

Removed

Risks Factors Related to Digital Assets

Reworded

The trading prices of many digital assets, including bitcoin, have experienced extreme volatility in recent periods and may continue to do so. For instance, the average annualized one-year trailing volatility of bitcoin over the past ten years to date remains elevated at 81%.65%. ThereOver the course of 2021, there were steep increases in the value of certain digital assets, including bitcoin, over the course of 2021, and multiple market observers asserted the opinion that digital assets were experiencing a “bubble.” These increases were followed by steep drawdowns throughout 2022 in digital asset trading prices, including forthe price of bitcoin. In the 2021-2022 cycle, the price of bitcoin peaked at $67,734 and bottomed at $15,632, markingexhibiting a steep 77% drawdown. These episodes of rapid price appreciation followed by steepsignificant drawdowns have occurred multiple times throughout bitcoin’sbitcoin's history, including in 2011, 2013-2014, and 2017-2018, before repeating again in 2021-2022.2021-2022 and 2024. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026, the price of bitcoin continued to exhibit volatility. For example, bitcoin lost approximately 14% of its value according to some sources in mid-October 2025 as part of wider digital asset market turmoil, precipitated by global trade tensions and structural leverage, which triggered a number of dislocations in the digital asset market (the “October 2025 Flash Crash”), including liquidations of up to $20 billion in collateral in the form of various digital assets (including, but not limited to, bitcoin) securing trades (particularly perpetual futures contracts and various forms of financing transactions), along with reported service interruptions, halted orders, forced unwinding of trades, and other issues, across centralized and decentralized exchanges.

Added

Furthermore, changes in U.S. political leadership and economic policies may create uncertainty that materially affects the price of bitcoin and the Fund's Shares. For example, on March 6, 2025, President Trump signed an Executive Order to establish a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and a United States Digital Asset Stockpile. Pursuant to this Executive Order, the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve was directed to be capitalized with Bitcoin owned by the Department of Treasury that was forfeited as part of criminal or civil asset forfeiture proceedings, and the Secretaries of Treasury and Commerce are authorized to develop budget-neutral strategies for acquiring additional bitcoin, provided that those strategies impose no incremental costs on American taxpayers. The anticipation of a U.S. government-funded strategic cryptocurrency reserve had motivated large-scale purchases of certain digital assets in the expectation of the U.S. government acquiring digital assets, to fund such reserve, and the market price of such digital assets decreased significantly as a result of the ultimate content of the Executive Order. Any similar action or omission by the U.S. federal administration or other government authorities with respect to bitcoin or other digital assets may negatively and significantly impact the price of bitcoin and the Fund's Shares.

Added

The ultimate impact of these recent regulatory developments on the Fund's business is uncertain and it is not possible to predict at this time what risks, if any, that regulatory developments may pose to the Fund, its service providers or to the digital asset industry as a whole.

Reworded

Extreme volatility may persist and the value of the Shares may significantly decline in the future without recovery. The digital asset markets may still be experiencingexperience a bubble or maysignificant experience a bubble againcorrection in the future. Digital assets including bitcoin remain susceptible to cyber security events, fraud, manipulation or similar disruptions. For example, in the first half of 2022, each of Celsius Network, Voyager Digital Ltd., and Three Arrows Capital declared bankruptcy, resulting in a loss of confidence in participants of the digital asset ecosystem and negative publicity surrounding digital assets more broadly. In November 2022, FTX Trading Ltd. (“‟FTX”), one of the largest digital asset exchangesplatforms by volume at the time, halted customer withdrawals amid rumors of the company’s liquidity issues and likely insolvency, which were subsequently corroborated by its CEO. Shortly thereafter, FTX’s CEO resigned and FTX and many of its affiliates filed for bankruptcy in the United States, while other affiliates have entered insolvency, liquidation, or similar proceedings around the globe, following which the U.S. Department of Justice brought criminal fraud and other charges, and the SEC and CFTC brought civil securities and commodities fraud charges, against certain of FTX’s and its affiliates’ senior executives, including its former CEO. In addition, several other entities in the digital asset industry filed for bankruptcy following FTX’s bankruptcy filing, such as BlockFi Inc. and Genesis Global Capital, LLC (“Genesis”). In April 2025, the DOJ issued a policy memo ending "regulation by prosecution" for crypto actors, refocusing on fraud, illicit finance, and aligning enforcement with executive directives. Acting CFTC Chairman directed staff to follow the DOJ's new policy, pausing certain prosecutions. In July 2025, BlockFi reached a $35 million settlement with the DOJ, clearing legal hurdles for creditor distributions. In response to these events (collectively, the “‟2022 Events”), the digital asset markets experienced extreme price volatility and other entities in the digital asset industry have been, and may continue to be, negatively affected, further undermining confidence in the digital asset markets. These events have also negatively impacted the liquidity of the digital asset markets as certain entities affiliated with FTX engaged in significant trading activity. If the liquidity of the digital asset markets continues to be negatively impacted by similar events, digital asset prices, including bitcoin, may continue to experience significant volatility or price declines and confidence in the digital asset markets may be further undermined. In addition, regulatory and enforcement scrutiny increased in response to these events, and could further increase in response to similar events in the future, including federal as well as state regulators and authorities.

Removed

The price of some digital assets, including bitcoin, has risen following the election of Donald Trump as president of the United States. Industry participants generally expect the administration to continue to take a constructive approach toward the digital assets industry. Through his executive orders, President Trump has indicated that the administration will work toward providing greater regulatory clarity and certainty for emerging technologies, including blockchain technology and digital assets, thereby fostering their development. Similarly, the digital assets industry expects favorable legislation from the new U.S. Congress as certain members have expressed interest in advancing digital asset specific legislation. To the extent market expectations about future activity by the administration or Congress lead digital asset prices and valuations to increase, there can be no assurance such expectations will be fulfilled, or that digital asset prices will rise or maintain their current levels. Some commentators have referred to the digital asset market post-President Trump's election as a bubble. There can be no assurance that such a bubble does not exist. The failure of the administration and Congress to provide greater regulatory clarity and certainty for blockchain technology and digital assets, such as through promulgating a regulatory framework governing the issuance and operation of digital assets that meets industry expectations, could lead to a decline in digital assets prices, including bitcoin. Such a decline could cause a decline in the value of the Shares and cause Shareholders to suffer losses. Moreover, there can be no assurance that political sentiments toward the digital asset industry, or market perceptions of those sentiments, will not shift over time.

Reworded

Extreme volatility in the future, including further declines in the trading prices of bitcoin, could have a material adverse effect on the value of the Shares and the Shares could lose all or substantially all of their value. The Fund is not actively managed and will not take any actions to take advantage, or mitigate the impacts, of volatility in the price of bitcoin. Additionally, advancements in capabilities of quantum computing and similar technology may pose challenges to the security of digital asset networks, including the bitcoin blockchain. There can be no assurance that these risks will be sufficiently mitigated with protective measures. Vulnerabilities in cryptography supporting digital asset transactions, including with respect to bitcoin, could adversely impact confidence across digital markets generally, and cause volatility or substantial declines in the price of bitcoin and the Shares.

Reworded

The value of the Shares is subject to a number of factors relating to the fundamental investment characteristics of bitcoin as a digital asset, including the fact that digital assets are bearer instruments and loss, theft, destruction, or compromise of the associated private keys could result in permanent loss of the asset, and the capabilities and development of blockchain technologies such as the Bitcoin blockchain.

Reworded

Digital assets such as bitcoin were only introduced within the past 16approximately 15 years, and the value of the Shares is subject to a number of factors over time relating to the capabilities and development of blockchain technologies over time, such as the recentness of their development, their dependence on the internet and other technologies, their dependence on the role played by users, developers and miners and the potential for malicious activity.

Reworded

Digital asset networks, including the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network and associated blockchain ledger (the “Bitcoin blockchain” and together with the peer-to-peer network, the “Bitcoin network”), and the software used to operate them are in the early stages of development. Given the recentness of the development of digital asset networks, digital assets may not function as intended and parties may be unwilling to use digital assets, which would dampen the growth, if any, of digital asset networks. Because bitcoin is a digital asset, the value of the Shares is subject to a number of factors relating to the fundamental investment characteristics of digital assets, including the fact that digital assets are bearer instruments and loss, theft, compromise, or destruction of the associated private keys could result in permanent loss of the asset.

Reworded

Governance of the Bitcoin network is by voluntary consensus and open competition. As a result, there may be a lack of consensus or clarity on the governance of the Bitcoin network, which may stymie the Bitcoin network’s utility and ability to grow and face challenges. In particular, it may be difficult to find solutions or martialmarshal sufficient effort to overcome any future problems on the Bitcoin network, especially long-term problems.

Reworded

Over the past decade, bitcoin mining operations have evolved from individual users mining with computer processors, graphics processing units and first-generation application specific integrated circuit (“ASIC”) machines to “professionalized” mining operations using proprietary hardware or sophisticated machines. If the profit margins of bitcoin mining operations are not sufficiently high, including due to an increase in electricity costs or a decline in the market price of bitcoin, or if bitcoin mining operations are unable to arrange alternative sources of financing (e.g., if lenders refuse to make loans to such miners), bitcoin miners are more likely to immediately sell more bitcoins than they otherwise would, resulting in an increase in liquid supply of bitcoin, which would generally tend to reduce bitcoin’s market price.

Reworded

Many digital asset networks, including the Bitcoin network, face significant scaling challenges and may periodically be upgraded with various features designed to increase the speed and throughput of digital asset transactions. These attempts to increase the volume of transactions may not be effective,effective or may result in unforeseen problems or issues, and such upgrades may fail, resulting in potentially irreparable damage to the Bitcoin network and to the value of bitcoin.

Added

There are a small number of major suppliers of bitcoin mining hardware globally, and a significant amount of bitcoin mining hardware manufacturing is located in China. Mining hardware manufacturers may fail to supply the mining hardware due to their inability to manufacture sufficient mining hardware, whether due to shortages of components or resources such as semiconductors, or due to default, insolvency, or changes of laws and trade restrictions (including export/import restrictions, quotas or tariffs). Trade policies such as export/import restrictions, quotas or tariffs may reduce the ability of bitcoin mining hardware suppliers to supply miners with bitcoin mining hardware or create a shortage or lack of components necessary for their manufacture or repair. If bitcoin miners are unable to source mining hardware from those suppliers (for example due to overwhelming global demand for bitcoin miners, or due to trade restrictions, or other causes) at commercially reasonable prices, or at all, and replacement or substitute sources of bitcoin mining hardware prove to be unavailable, there could be a negative impact on bitcoin mining globally. These could affect the Bitcoin network by making it more difficult for transactions to be confirmed, increasing transaction costs, or affecting the Bitcoin network's security, among other negative effects, any of which could negatively affect the value of bitcoin and consequently the Shares.

Reworded

Moreover, in the past, bugs, defects, and flaws in the source code for digital assets have been exposed and exploited, including flaws that disrupted normal Ethereum network, Ethereum Client or Decentralized Application (“DApp”) and smart contract operations or disabled some functionality for users, exposed users’ personal information and/or resulted in the theft of users’ digital assets. For example, in May 2023, the main Ethereum network itself reportedly suffered outages or bugs that for a short time prevented transactions from finalizing and being recorded in blocks twice in two days. Major Ethereum Clients that nodes use to access the Ethereum network, such as Geth, Besu and Nethermind, have in the past suffered outages or disruptions due to bugs. The cryptography underlying bitcoin could prove to be flawed or ineffective, or developments in mathematics and/or technology, including advances in digital computing, algebraic geometry and quantum computing, could result in such cryptography becoming ineffective. In any of these circumstances, a malicious actor may be able to compromise the security of the Bitcoin network or take the Fund’s bitcoin, which would adversely affect the value of the Shares. Moreover, functionality of the Bitcoin network may be negatively affected such that it is no longer attractive to users, thereby dampening demand for bitcoin. Even if another digital asset other than bitcoin were affected by similar circumstances, any reduction in confidence in the source code or cryptography underlying digital assets generally could negatively affect the demand for digital assets and therefore adversely affect the value of the Shares.

Reworded

The Bitcoin network was first launched in 2009 and bitcoinsbitcoin werewas the first cryptographic digital assetsasset created to gain global adoption and critical mass. Although the Bitcoin network is the most established digital asset network, the Bitcoin network and other cryptographic and algorithmic protocols governing the issuance of digital assets represent a new and rapidly evolving industry that is subject to a variety of factors that are difficult to evaluate. For example, the realization of one or more of the following risks could materially adversely affect the value of the Shares:

Reworded

Bitcoins have only recently become selectively accepted as a means of payment by retail and commercial outlets, and use of bitcoins by consumers to pay such retail and commercial outlets remains limited. Banks and other established financial institutions may refuse to process funds for bitcoin transactions; process wire transfers to or from digital asset exchanges,platforms, bitcoin-related companies or service providers; or maintain accounts for persons or entities transacting in bitcoin. As a result, the prices of bitcoinsbitcoin may be influenced to a significant extent by speculators and(including miners, thus contributing to price volatility that makes retailers less likely to accept it as a form of payment in the future.

Reworded

Certain privacy-preserving features have been or are expected to be introduced to digital asset networks, such as the Bitcoin network, and exchangesplatforms or businesses that facilitate transactions in bitcoin may be at an increased risk of criminal or civil lawsuits, or of having banking services cut off if there is a concern that these features interfere with the performance of anti-moneyanti‑money laundering duties and economic sanctions checks or facilitate illicit financing or crime.

Reworded

Users, protocol and application developers and miners may otherwise switch to or adopt certain digital assets at the expense of their engagement with other digital asset networks, which may negatively impact those networks, including the Bitcoin network.

Reworded

The Fund is not actively managed and willdoes not havepursue any formal strategy relating to the development of the Bitcoin network.

Reworded

The governance of decentralized networks, such as the Bitcoin network, is by voluntary consensus and open competition. As a result, there may be a lack of consensus or clarity on the governance of any particular decentralized digital asset network, which may stymie such network’s utility and ability to grow and face challenges. The foregoing notwithstanding, the protocols for some decentralized networks, such as the Bitcoin network, are informally managed by a group of core developers that propose amendments to the relevant network’s source code. Core developers’ roles evolve over time, largely based on self-determinedself‑determined participation. If a significant majority of users and miners adopt amendments to a decentralized network based on the proposals of such core developers, such network will be subject to new protocols that may adversely affect the value of the relevant digital asset.

Reworded

The Bitcoin network uses a cryptographic protocol to govern the interactions within the Bitcoin network. A loose community known as the core developers has evolved to informally manage the source code for the protocol. Membership in the community of core developers evolve over time, largely based on self-determined participation in the resource section dedicated to bitcoin on Github.com. The core developers can propose amendments to the Bitcoin network’s source code that, if accepted by miners and users, could alter the protocols and software of the Bitcoin network and the properties of bitcoin. These alterations would occur through software upgrades, and could potentially include changes to the irreversibility of transactions and limitations on the mining of new bitcoin, which could undermine the appeal and market value of bitcoin. Alternatively, software upgrades and other changes to the protocols of the Bitcoin network could fail to work as intended or could introduce bugs, coding defects or flaws, security risks, or otherwise adversely affect, the speed, security, usability, or value of the Bitcoin network or bitcoins. As a result, the Bitcoin network could be subject to changes to its protocols and software in the future that may adversely affect an investment in the Fund.

Reworded

The open-source structure of the Bitcoin network protocol means that the core developers and other contributors are generally not directly compensated for their contributions in maintaining and developing the Bitcoin network protocol. A failure to properly monitor and upgrade the Bitcoin network protocol could damage the Bitcoin network and negatively affect the value of an investment in the Fund.

Reworded

The Bitcoin network operates based on an open-source protocol maintained by the core developers and other contributors, largely on the GitHub resource section dedicated to bitcoin development. As bitcoins are rewarded solely for mining activity and are not sold to raise capital for the Bitcoin network, and the Bitcoin network protocol itself is made available for free rather than sold or made available subject to licensing or subscription fees and its use does not generate revenues for its development team, the core developers are generally not compensated for maintaining and updating the source code for the Bitcoin network protocol. Consequently, there is a lack of financial incentive for developers to maintain or develop the Bitcoin network and the core developers may lack the resources to adequately address emerging issues with the Bitcoin network protocol. Although the Bitcoin network is currently supported by the core developers, there can be no guarantee that such support will continue or be sufficient in the future. For example, there have been recent reports that the number of core developers who have the authority to make amendments to the Bitcoin network’s source code in the GitHub repository is relatively small, although there are believed to be a larger number of developers who contribute to the overall development of the source code of the Bitcoin network. Alternatively, some developers may be funded by entities whose interests are at odds with other participants in the Bitcoin network. In addition, a bad actor could also attempt to interfere with the operation of the Bitcoin network by attempting to exercise a malign influence over a core developer. To the extent that material issues arise with the Bitcoin network protocol and the core developers and open-source contributors are unable to address the issues adequately or in a timely manner, the Bitcoin network and an investment in the Fund may be adversely affected.

Reworded

As corresponding increases in throughput lag behind growth in the use of digital asset networks, average fees and settlement times may increase considerably. For example, the Bitcoin network has been, at times, at capacity, which has led to increased transaction fees. Since January 1, 2019, bitcoin transaction fees have increased from $0.18 per bitcoin transaction, on average, to a high of $60.95 per transaction, on average, on April 20, 2021. As of December 31, 2023,2025, Coin Metrics reported bitcoin transaction fees were $4.45$1.18 per transaction, on average.average, over a one-year trailing period. Increased fees and decreased settlement speeds could preclude certain uses for bitcoin (e.g., micropayments), and could reduce demand for, and the price of, bitcoin, which could adversely impact the value of the Shares. In May 2023, events related to the adoption of ordinals, which are a means of inscribing digital content on the bitcoin blockchain, caused transaction fees to temporarily spike above $30 per transaction. As of MarchJanuary 31,23, 2025,2026, bitcoin transaction fees were $1.27averaging 2.4 basis points per transaction, on average.transaction.

Reworded

Currently, the reward earned by miners for mining a block on the Bitcoin network is 6.253.125 bitcoins.bitcoin per block. This reward size is reduced by 50% every 210,000 blocks, which occurs roughly every 4 years. The most recent reward halving event occurred in April 2024 at which timeand the next reward earnedhalving perevent blockis will fallexpected to 3.125occur bitcoins.in 2028. The reduction in mining rewards of bitcoin, could be inadequate to incentivize miners to continue to perform mining activities, thereby jeopardizing the security of the Bitcoin network, which could harm the value of the Shares.

Reworded

Miners have historically accepted relatively low transaction confirmation fees on most digital asset networks. If miners demand higher transaction fees for recording transactions in the Bitcoin blockchain or a software upgrade automatically charges fees for all transactions on the Bitcoin network, the cost of using bitcoin may increase and the marketplace may be reluctant to accept bitcoin as a means of payment. Alternatively, miners could collude in an anti-competitiveanti‑competitive manner to reject low transaction fees on the Bitcoin network and force users to pay higher fees, thus reducing the attractiveness of the Bitcoin network. Higher transaction confirmation fees resulting through collusion or otherwise may adversely affect the attractiveness of the Bitcoin network, the value of bitcoin and the value of the Shares.

Reworded

To the extent that any miners cease to record transactions that do not include the payment of a transaction fee in mined blocks or do not record a transaction because the transaction fee is too low, such transactions will not be recorded on the Bitcoin blockchain until a block is mined by a miner who does not require the payment of transaction fees or is willing to accept a lower fee. Also, some miners have financed the acquisition of mining equipment or the development or construction of infrastructure to perform mining activities by borrowing. If such miners experience financial difficulties and are unable to pay back their borrowings, their mining capacity could become unavailable to the Bitcoin network, which could conceivably result in disruptions in recording transactions on the Bitcoin network. Any widespread delays or disruptions in the recording of transactions could result in a loss of confidence in the Bitcoin network and could prevent the Administrator from completing transactions associated with the day-to-day operations of the Fund, including creations and redemptions of the Shares in exchange for bitcoin and/or cash with Authorized Participants.Participants and/or their designees.

Added

Furthermore, bitcoin may be subject to supply chain attacks, in which hackers target third-party components, services or software that a digital asset network relies on instead of attacking the network itself. For example, in April 2025, a malware attack was discovered in a widely used open-source JavaScript library associated with the XRP Ledger. The malicious code was inserted through a supply chain vulnerability and had the potential to compromise applications built using the affected library. While the core XRP Ledger protocol and validator infrastructure were not directly compromised, some third-party applications that integrated the compromised library may have been exposed to risks, including unauthorized access to user data and disruption of application functionality. The vulnerability was identified and remediated by the developer community shortly after discovery, and no material exploitation of the malware has been publicly confirmed. However, the incident highlights the risks attendant to reliance on third-party software components. Future incidents of a similar nature could adversely affect confidence in the digital asset markets or blockchain technologies generally, which could negatively impact the value of the Shares.

Reworded

The Bitcoin network operates using open-source protocols, meaning that any user can download the software, modify such software and then propose that the users and miners of bitcoin adopt the modification. When a modification is introduced and a substantial majority of users and miners consent to the modification, the change is implemented and the network remains uninterrupted. However, if less than a substantial majority of users and miners consent to the proposed modification, and the modification is not compatible with the software prior to its modification, the consequence would be what is known as a “hard fork” of the Bitcoin network, with one group running the pre-modifiedpre‑modified software and the other running the modified software. The effect of such a fork would be the existence of two versions of bitcoin running in parallel on separate networks using separate blockchain ledgers, yet lacking interchangeability. For example, in August 2017, Bitcoin “forked” into Bitcoin and a new digital asset, Bitcoin Cash, as a result of a several-year dispute over how to increase the rate of transactions that the Bitcoin network can process.

Reworded

Forks may also occur as a network community’s response to a significant security breach. For example, in July 2016, Ethereum “forked” into Ethereum and a new digital asset, Ethereum Classic, as a result of the Ethereum network community’s response to a significant security breach in which an anonymous hacker exploited a smart contract running on the Ethereum network to syphon approximately $60 million of ETH held by The DAO, a distributed autonomous organization, into a segregated account. In response to the hack, most participants in the Ethereum community elected to adopt a “fork” that effectively reversed the hack. However, a minority of users continued to develop the original blockchain, now referred to as “Ethereum Classic” with the digital asset on that blockchain now referred to as Ethereum Classic, or ETC. ETC now trades on several digital asset exchanges.platforms. A fork may also occur as a result of an unintentional or unanticipated software flaw in the various versions of otherwise compatible software that users run. Such a fork could lead to users and miners abandoning the digital asset with the flawed software. It is possible, however, that a substantial number of users and miners could adopt an incompatible version of the digital asset while resisting community-led efforts to merge the two chains. This could result in a permanent fork, as in the case of Ethereum and Ethereum Classic.

Reworded

Furthermore, a hard fork can lead to new security concerns. For example, when the Ethereum and Ethereum Classic networks split in July 2016, replay attacks, in which transactions from one network were rebroadcast to nefarious effect on the other network, plagued Ethereum exchangesplatforms through at least October 2016. An Ethereum exchangeplatform announced in July 2016 that it had lost 40,000 Ethereum Classic, worth about $100,000 at that time, as a result of replay attacks. Similar replay attack concerns occurred in connection with the Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin Satoshi’s Vision networks split in November 2018. Another possible result of a hard fork is an inherent decrease in the level of security due to significant amounts of mining power remaining on one network or migrating instead to the new forked network. After a hard fork, it may become easier for an individual miner or mining pool’s hashing power to exceed 50% of the processing power of a digital asset network that retained or attracted less mining power, thereby making digital asset networks that rely on proof-of-work more susceptible to attack.

Reworded

As another example of the effects of hard forks on digital assets, on September 15, 2022, the Ethereum Network completed its merge, moving from a proof-of-work model to a proof-of-stake model. Ethereum proof-of-work miners who disagreed with the new consensus mechanism forked the network which resulted in the Ethereum proof-of-work network. The Ethereum proof-of-work network was driven by a small but vocal group of miners who wished to hold onto revenue as Ethereum switched to proof-of-stake. The vast majority of token holder votes preferred the new proof-of-stake consensus method. There was no material impact on the Ethereum network as a result of the fork. All ether holders were airdropped Ethereum proof-of-work network tokens as a result of the hard fork. However, not all liquidity providers were able to trade the new token and the Ethereum proof-of-work network token almost immediately lost most of its value.

Added

There have been other contentious disputes over changes to the Bitcoin network's source code, though these have not led to hard forks. For example, the predominant software implementation used to access the Bitcoin network is Bitcoin Core. The October 2025 release of the updated Bitcoin Core client (version 30) removed a long-standing limit on the inclusion of non-transaction-related data in blocks, the effect of which is to permit larger amounts of arbitrary data to be embedded in transactions. This change has prompted debate within the bitcoin community. Because the change is backwards-compatible, rather than a hard fork, certain previous versions of the Bitcoin Core client remain operable, and it remains interoperable with other clients, such as Bitcoin Knots. Some participants have expressed concerns that such changes could facilitate the inclusion of illegal or non-transaction-related content on the Bitcoin blockchain or could introduce new or unknown software vulnerabilities. In response, certain miners and users have reportedly adopted alternative client software implementations to access the Bitcoin network, such as Bitcoin Knots. There is a risk that unresolved divisions could lead to community fragmentation which, if they grew sufficiently severe and were not resolved, eventually a future Bitcoin network hard fork could occur, which may adversely affect the security or stability of the Bitcoin network (such as if miners leave the original Bitcoin network for the forked network) , reduce or impede the adoption of bitcoin overall, or cause bitcoin or the Shares to lose value.

Added

Protocols may also be cloned. Unlike a fork, which modifies an existing blockchain, and results in two competing networks, each with the same genesis block, a “clone” is a copy of a protocol’s codebase, but results in an entirely new blockchain and new genesis block. Tokens are created solely from the new “clone” network and, in contrast to forks, holders of tokens of the existing network that was cloned do not receive any tokens of the new network. A “clone” results in a competing network that has characteristics substantially similar to the network it was based on, subject to any changes as determined by the developer(s) that initiated the clone. A clone may also adversely affect the price of bitcoin at the time of announcement or adoption or subsequently. For example, on November 6, 2016, Rhett Creighton, a Zcash developer, cloned the Zcash Network to launch Zclassic, a substantially identical version of the Zcash Network that eliminated the Founders’ Reward. For the days following the date the first Zclassic block was mined, the price of ZEC fell from $504.57 on November 5, 2016 to $236.01 on November 7, 2016 in the midst of a broader sell off of ZEC beginning immediately after the Zcash Network launch on October 28, 2016.

Removed

In addition to forks, a digital asset may become subject to a similar occurrence known as an “airdrop.” In an airdrop, the promotors of a new digital asset announce to holders of another digital asset that such holders will be entitled to claim a certain amount of the new digital asset for free, based on the fact that they hold such other digital asset. For example, in March 2017 the promoters of Stellar Lumens announced that anyone that owned bitcoin as of June 26, 2017 could claim, until August 27, 2017, a certain amount of Stellar Lumens. Airdrops could create operational security, legal or regulatory, or other risks for the Fund, the Sponsor, the Bitcoin Custodian, Authorized Participants, or other entities.

Reworded

Shareholders shouldwill not expect to receive the benefits of any forksIncidental Rights and any IR Virtual Currency, including any forked or “airdrops.”airdropped assets.

Added

In addition to forks, a digital asset may become subject to a similar occurrence known as an “airdrop.” In an airdrop, the promoters of a new digital asset announce to holders of another digital asset that such holders will be entitled to claim a certain amount of the new digital asset for free, based on the fact that they hold such other digital asset. For example, in March 2017 the promoters of Stellar Lumens announced that anyone that owned bitcoin as of June 26, 2017 could claim, until August 27, 2017, a certain amount of Stellar Lumens. Airdrops could create operational security, legal or regulatory, or other risks for the Fund, the Sponsor, the Bitcoin Custodian, Authorized Participants, or other entities.

Reworded

The Fund will not hold any crypto assetassets other than bitcoin. Accordingly, Shareholders may not receive the benefits of any forks, the Fund may not choose, or be able to participate in an airdrop, and the timing of receiving any benefits from a fork, airdrop or similar event is uncertain. WeThe referTrust refers to the right to receive any such benefit as an “Incidental Right” and any such virtual currency acquired through an Incidental Right as “IR Virtual Currency.” The Sponsor has the right, in the Sponsor’s sole discretion, to determine: (i) with respect to any fork, airdrop or similar event, what action the Fund shall take, and (ii) what action to take in connection with the Fund’s entitlement to or ownership of Incidental Rights or any IR Virtual Currency. The Sponsor intends to evaluate each fork, airdrop or similar occurrence on a case-by-case basis in consultation with the Fund’s legal advisors, tax consultants, the Administrator, and the Bitcoin Custodian. The Sponsor is under no obligation to realize any economic benefit from any Incidental Rights or IR Virtual Currency on behalf of the Fund. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to any airdrop of any non-bitcoin crypto asset, including Incidental Rights and/or IR Virtual Currency, or in the event of a fork where it has been determined, in the discretion of the Sponsor, that the crypto asset received by the Fund is not bitcoin, or any similar event, the Sponsor will cause the Fund to irrevocably abandon such non-bitcoin crypto asset and, in the event that the Fund seeks to change this position, an application would need to be filed with the SEC by Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc., the listing exchange, seeking approval to amend its listing rules. For the avoidance of doubt, the only crypto asset to be held by the Fund will be bitcoin; the Fund does not have the ability or intention to hold any other crypto asset, and specific regulatory approval would be required in order to do so.

Added

Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to any airdrop of any non-bitcoin crypto asset, including Incidental Rights and/or IR Virtual Currency, or in the event of a fork where it has been determined, in the discretion of the Sponsor, that the crypto asset received by the Fund is not bitcoin, or any similar event, the Sponsor will cause the Fund to irrevocably abandon such non-bitcoin crypto asset. .

Reworded

There are likely to be operational, tax, securities law, regulatory, legal and practical issues that significantly limit, or prevent entirely, Shareholders’ ability to realize a benefit, through their Shares in the Fund, from any airdrop, fork or similar event. Additionally ,Additionally, as noted above the Fund may only hold bitcoin and cash.bitcoin.

Reworded

In the event of a hard fork of the Bitcoin network, the Sponsor will, as permitted by the terms of the Declaration of Trust, use its sole discretion to determine, in good faith, which peer-to-peer network, among a group of incompatible forks of the Bitcoin network, is generally accepted as the Bitcoin network and should therefore be considered the appropriate network for the Fund’s purposes. The Sponsor will base its determination on whatever factors it deems relevant, includingincluding, but not limited to, the Sponsor’s beliefs regarding expectations of the core developers of bitcoin, users, services, businesses, miners and other constituencies, as well as the actual continued acceptance of, mining power on, and community engagement with, the Bitcoin network, or whatever other factors it deems relevant. There is no guarantee that the Sponsor will choose the digital asset that is ultimately the most valuable fork, and the Sponsor’s decision may adversely affect the value of the Shares as a result. The Sponsor may also disagree with Shareholders, the Bitcoin Custodian, other service providers, the Index Administrator, cryptocurrency exchanges,platforms, or other market participants on what is generally accepted as bitcoin and should therefore be considered “bitcoin” for the Fund’s purposes, which may also adversely affect the value of the Shares as a result.

Added

Disruptions or other problems in the supply chain for bitcoin mining hardware and difficulties in obtaining new hardware could cause harm to the Bitcoin network.

Added

Manufacture, assembly and delivery of hardware and components for mining operations can be complex and protracted processes, in the course of which various problems could arise, including disruptions or delays in the supply chain, product quality control issues, as well as other external factors.

Added

Mining operations can ordinarily only be profitable if the costs associated with bitcoin mining, including hardware costs, are lower than the price of bitcoin itself. In the course of the normal operation of bitcoin mining facilities, miners and other critical equipment and materials related to data center construction and maintenance, such as containers, switch gears, transformers and cables, will experience ordinary wear and tear and may also face more significant malfunctions. Declines in the condition of miners and other hardware will require bitcoin miners, over time, to repair or replace those miners.

Added

Additionally, as the technology evolves, miners may be required to acquire newer models of mining hardware and machines to remain competitive in the market. Any upgrading process may require substantial capital investment, and miners may face challenges in doing so on a timely and cost-effective basis. The business of bitcoin miners will be subject to limitations inherent within the supply chain of their mining hardware equipment and components, including competitive, governmental, and legal limitations, and other events. For example, many miners will significantly rely on foreign imports to obtain mining hardware equipment and materials. Any global trade disruption, introductions of tariffs, trade barriers and bilateral trade frictions, together with any potential downturns in the global economy resulting therefrom, could adversely affect the necessary supply chains for mining hardware. Depending on the magnitude of such effects on the mining hardware supply chain, shipments of parts for mining hardware, or new mining hardware and equipment, may be delayed.

Added

There are a small number of major suppliers of bitcoin mining hardware globally, and a significant amount of bitcoin mining hardware manufacturing is located in China. Mining hardware manufacturers may fail to supply the mining hardware due to their inability to manufacture sufficient mining hardware, whether due to shortages of components or resources such as semiconductors, or changes of laws and trade restrictions (including export/import restrictions, quotas or tariffs), or due to insolvency, or non-performance or default on their contracts. Trade policies such as export/import restrictions, quotas or tariffs may reduce the ability of bitcoin mining hardware suppliers to supply miners with bitcoin mining hardware or create a shortage or lack of components necessary for their manufacture or repair. If bitcoin miners are unable to source mining hardware from those suppliers (for example due to overwhelming global demand for bitcoin miners, or due to trade restrictions, or other causes) at commercially reasonable prices, or at all, and replacement or substitute sources of bitcoin mining hardware prove to be unavailable, there could be a negative impact on bitcoin mining globally. These could affect the Bitcoin network by making it more difficult for transactions to be confirmed, increase transaction costs, or affect the Bitcoin network's security, among other negative effects, any of which could negatively affect the value of bitcoin and consequently the Shares.

Added

Further, ASIC chips and other critical components for mining equipment may be subject to price fluctuations or shortages. For example, the ASIC chip is the key component of a mining machine as it determines the efficiency of the device. The production of ASIC chips typically requires highly sophisticated silicon wafers, which currently only a small number of fabrication facilities, or wafer foundries, in the world are capable of producing. There have been previous microchip shortages which led to price fluctuations and disruption in the supply of key bitcoin mining hardware components. ASIC chips have recently been subject to supply and demand fluctuations, significant price increases and shortages. Shortages of ASIC chips could create problems in the supply chain for bitcoin mining equipment, negatively affecting the Bitcoin network by making it more difficult for transactions to be confirmed or increasing transaction costs, or even affecting network security, which again could cause the value of bitcoin and the Shares to decline.

Showing the first 60 of 196 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

3new paragraphs
6removed paragraphs
19reworded paragraphs
3,637 → 3,247words in section

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text
“On December 15, 2023, the Seed Capital Investor purchased 4,000 Shares at a per-Share price equal to $25.00 (the “Initial Seed Shares”). Delivery of the Initial Seed Shares was made on December 15, 2023. Total proceeds to the Fund from the sale of the Initial Seed Shares were $100,000. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“On December 15, 2023, the Seed Capital Investor purchased 4,000 Shares at a per-Share price equal to $25.00 (the “Initial Seed Shares”). Delivery of the Initial Seed Shares was made on December 15, 2023. Total proceeds to the Fund from the sale of the Initial Seed Shares were $100,000. …”
see in full comparison
New text
“Net realized and change in unrealized gain on investment in bitcoin for the year ended March 31, 2025, was approximately $109,872,131 which includes a realized gain of $102,547 on the sale of bitcoin to pay the Sponsor’s fee, net realized gain on investment in bitcoin sold for redemptions of $73,871,502 and net change in unrealized appreciation on investment in bitcoin of approximately $35,898,082. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

The Sponsor’s fee is accrued daily at an annualized rate equal to 0.19% (i.e., 0.19%/365 days) of the net asset value of the Fund and is payable at least quarterly in arrears in U.S. dollars or in-kind or any combination thereof.dollars. The Sponsor may, at its sole discretion and from time to time, waive all or a portion of the Sponsor’s fee for stated periods of time. The Sponsor is under no obligation to waive any portion of its fees and any such waiver shall create no obligation to waive any such fees during any period not covered by the waiver. There are no specific circumstances under which the Sponsor has determined to waive its fees. If the Sponsor decides to waive all or a portion of the Sponsor’s Fee, Shareholders will be notified of any such waiver in a prospectus supplement, in the Fund’s periodic reports and/or on the Fund’s website. The Fund will sell bitcoin as needed to pay the Sponsor’s fee. The Fund bears transaction costs, including any bitcoin network fees or other similar transaction fees, in connection with any sales of bitcoin necessary to pay the Sponsor’s fee, as well as other Fund expenses (if any) that are not assumed by the Sponsor (expenses assumed by the Sponsor are specified above). Any bitcoin network fees and similar transaction fees incurred in connection with the creation or redemption of Creation Units are borne by the Authorized Participant. For a period from January 12, 2024 to August 2, 2024, theThe Sponsor waived a portion of the Sponsor’s Fee so that the Sponsor’s Fee after the fee waiver would be equal to 0.00% of the net asset value of the Fund for the first $10.0 billion of the Fund’s assets. Prior to the implementation of the waiver, for the one day period January 11, 2024, the Fund accrued the Sponsor fee of 0.29% ($21). Fees accruedrecognized for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20252026 were ($720,559) after waiver.$1,028,947. In the future, if the Sponsor decides to waive all or a portion of the Sponsor’s Fee,fee, Shareholders will be notified in a prospectus supplement, in the Fund’s periodic reports and/or on the Sponsor’s website for the Fund.
see in full comparison
Reworded

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

The Sponsor’s fee is accrued daily at an annualized rate equal to 0.19% (i.e., 0.19%/365 days) of the net asset value of the Fund and is payable at least quarterly in arrears in U.S. dollars or in-kind or any combination thereof.dollars. The Sponsor may, at its sole discretion and from time to time, waive all or a portion of the Sponsor’s fee for stated periods of time. The Sponsor is under no obligation to waive any portion of its fees and any such waiver shall create no obligation to waive any such fees during any period not covered by the waiver. There are no specific circumstances under which the Sponsor has determined to waive its fees. If the Sponsor decides to waive all or a portion of the Sponsor's Fee, Shareholders will be notified of any such waiver in a prospectus supplement, in the Fund's periodic reports and/or on the Fund's website. The Fund will sell bitcoin as needed to pay the Sponsor’s fee. For a period from January 12, 2024 to August 2, 2024, the Sponsor waived a portion of the Sponsor’s Fee so that the Sponsor’s Fee after the fee waiver would be equal to 0.00% of the net asset value of the Fund for the first $10.0 billion of the Fund’s assets. Prior to the implementation of the waiver, for the one day period January 11, 2024, the Fund accrued the Sponsor fee of 0.29% ($21). Fees accruedrecognized for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20252026 were ($720,559) after waiver.$1,028,947. In the future, if the Sponsor decides to waive all or a portion of the Sponsor’s Fee,fee, Shareholders will be notified in a prospectus supplement, in the Fund’s periodic reports and/or on the Sponsor’s website for the Fund.
see in full comparison
Reworded

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

For the periodyear January 11, 2024 (Commencement of operations) toended March 31, 2024,2025, 8,250,0007,850,000 Shares were issued in exchange for 4,784.9986 of4,552.1726 bitcoin and no7,650,000 Shares were redeemed.redeemed in exchange for 4,433.6498 bitcoin. The Fund’s NAV per Share began the periodyear at $26.65$40.95 and ended the periodyear at $40.95.$48.05. The 17.34% increase in the Fund’s NAV perfrom Share$40.95 wasat dueMarch 31, 2024 to a$48.05 higherat March 31, 2025 is directly related to the 17.51% increase in the price of bitcoin. The Fund’s NAV increased slightly less than the price of bitcoin ofon $70,596.99a atpercentage periodbasis end,due whichto representedthe anSponsor’s increasefee less waiver of 53.62%$720,559 fromfor $45,956.16the at January 11, 2024.year.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (28)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 1 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

This annual report on Form 10-K, including this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. All statements (other than statements of historical fact) included in this Form 10-K that address activities, events or developments that may occur in the future, the Trust’s and the Fund’s operations, the Sponsor’s plans and references to the Trust’s and the Fund’s future success and other similar matters are forward-looking statements. Words such as “could,” “would,” “may,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “predict,” and variations on such words or negatives thereof, and similar expressions that reflect our current views with respect to future events and Trust and Fund performance, are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are only predictions, subject to risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict and many of which are outside of our control, and actual results could differ materially from those discussed. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed therein. We express our estimates, expectations, beliefs, and projections in good faith and believe them to have a reasonable basis. However, we make no assurances that management’s estimates, expectations, beliefs, or projections will be achieved or accomplished. These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions about many important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Such factors are discussed in: Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Form 10-K; Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Form 10-K, and other parts of this Form 10-K.parts. We do not intend to update any forward-looking statements even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the future, except as required by the federal securities laws.

Reworded

The Franklin Templeton Digital Holdings Trust (the “Trust”) was formed as a Delaware statutory trust on September 6, 2023, and is governed by the provisions of an Agreement and Declaration of Trust dated as of January 5, 2024. The Trust is not registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”) and is not a commodity pool for purposes of the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”). The Trust currently offers a single series, the Franklin Bitcoin ETF (the “Fund”), which is the sole series of the Trust. The Sponsor of the Trust and the Fund (the “Sponsor”) is Franklin Holdings, LLC. The Sponsor is not subject to regulation by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) as a commodity pool operator with respect to the Fund, or a commodity trading advisor with respect to the Fund. The Fund issues sharesShares (the “Shares”), which represent units of fractional undivided beneficial interest in and ownership of the Fund. The Shares of the Fund are listed on the Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (“Cboe BZX Exchange” or the “Exchange”).

Added

The Shares were first listed for trading and the Fund commenced operations on January 11, 2024.

Removed

On December 15, 2023, the Seed Capital Investor purchased 4,000 Shares at a per-Share price equal to $25.00 (the “Initial Seed Shares”). Delivery of the Initial Seed Shares was made on December 15, 2023. Total proceeds to the Fund from the sale of the Initial Seed Shares were $100,000. On January 8, 2024, the Initial Seed Shares were redeemed for $100,000 and the Seed Capital Investor purchased two creation units in a cash transaction comprised of a total of 100,000 Shares at a per-Share price based on 29.00000000 bitcoins per Creation Unit (or 0.00058 bitcoins per Share), for a total of 58.00000000 bitcoins (the “Seed Creation Units”). The cash proceeds to the Fund from the sale of the Seed Creation Units were used by the Fund to purchase 58.00000000 bitcoins at the price of $44,973.58 per bitcoin on January 8, 2024. The transaction and other costs incurred in connection with the Seed Creation Units were paid by the Seed Capital Investor and not borne by the Fund. Thus, the ultimate total proceeds to the Fund from the sale of the Seed Creation Units were $2,608,467.81 (an amount representing 58.00000000 bitcoins). The Shares were first listed for trading and the Fund commenced operations on January 11, 2024.

Reworded

The Fund seeks to reflect generally the performance of the price of bitcoin before payment of the Fund's expenses. The Shares are intended to offer a convenient means of making an investment similar to an investment in bitcoin relative to acquiring, holding and trading bitcoin directly on a peer-to-peer or other basis or via a digital asset platform. The Shares have been designed to remove obstacles associated with the complexities and operational burdens involved in a direct investment in bitcoin by providing an investment with a value that reflects the price of the bitcoin owned by the Fund at such time, less the Fund's expenses. The Fund is not a proxy for a direct investment in bitcoin. Rather, the Shares are intended to provide a cost-effective alternative means of obtaining investment exposure through the securities markets that is similar to an investment in bitcoin. The Fund is a passive investment vehicle and is not a leveraged product. The Sponsor does not actively manage the bitcoin held by the Fund. Except when aggregated in Creation Units, the Shares are not redeemable securities.

Reworded

The Fund issues Shares only to eligible financial institutions called Authorized Participants and only in one or more blocks of 50,000 Shares (“Creation Units”). Creation Units are redeemable only by Authorized Participants. Creation Units are issued and redeemed in exchange for cash. Individual Shares will not be redeemed by the Fund. During the period covered by this report, Creation Units were issued and redeemed in exchange for cash; however, the Fund buthas the ability to conduct creation and redemption transactions in-kind for bitcoin. The Shares are listed and traded on the Exchange under the ticker symbol “EZBC”. The market price of the Shares may be different than the Fund’s NAV per Share. The Fund issues and redeems Shares in Creation Units on a continuous basis at the applicable NAV per Share on the creationtransaction order date.

Reworded

The Fund’s only ordinary recurring expense is expected to be the Sponsor’s fee. In exchange for the Sponsor’s fee, the Sponsor has agreed to assume the ordinary fees and expenses incurred by the Fund, including but not limited to the following: the fees charged by the Administrator, the Marketing Agent, the Custodians and the Trustee, Cboe BZX Exchange listing fees, typical maintenance and transaction fees of the DTC, SEC registration fees, printing and mailing costs, tax reporting fees, audit fees, license fees and expenses, and up to $500,000 per annum in ordinary legal fees and expenses. The Sponsor will also paypaid the costs of the Fund’s organization and the initial offering costs, and may not seek reimbursement of such costs.

Reworded

The Sponsor’s fee is accrued daily at an annualized rate equal to 0.19% (i.e., 0.19%/365 days) of the net asset value of the Fund and is payable at least quarterly in arrears in U.S. dollars or in-kind or any combination thereof.dollars. The Sponsor may, at its sole discretion and from time to time, waive all or a portion of the Sponsor’s fee for stated periods of time. The Sponsor is under no obligation to waive any portion of its fees and any such waiver shall create no obligation to waive any such fees during any period not covered by the waiver. There are no specific circumstances under which the Sponsor has determined to waive its fees. If the Sponsor decides to waive all or a portion of the Sponsor’s Fee, Shareholders will be notified of any such waiver in a prospectus supplement, in the Fund’s periodic reports and/or on the Fund’s website. The Fund will sell bitcoin as needed to pay the Sponsor’s fee. The Fund bears transaction costs, including any bitcoin network fees or other similar transaction fees, in connection with any sales of bitcoin necessary to pay the Sponsor’s fee, as well as other Fund expenses (if any) that are not assumed by the Sponsor (expenses assumed by the Sponsor are specified above). Any bitcoin network fees and similar transaction fees incurred in connection with the creation or redemption of Creation Units are borne by the Authorized Participant. For a period from January 12, 2024 to August 2, 2024, theThe Sponsor waived a portion of the Sponsor’s Fee so that the Sponsor’s Fee after the fee waiver would be equal to 0.00% of the net asset value of the Fund for the first $10.0 billion of the Fund’s assets. Prior to the implementation of the waiver, for the one day period January 11, 2024, the Fund accrued the Sponsor fee of 0.29% ($21). Fees accruedrecognized for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20252026 were ($720,559) after waiver.$1,028,947. In the future, if the Sponsor decides to waive all or a portion of the Sponsor’s Fee,fee, Shareholders will be notified in a prospectus supplement, in the Fund’s periodic reports and/or on the Sponsor’s website for the Fund.

Reworded

The FundTrust is an “emerging growth company” as that term is used in the SecuritiesJumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 1933, as amended (the “SecuritiesJOBS Act”), and, as such, the Fund may electsubject to comply with certain reduced public company reporting requirements.requirements under U.S. federal securities laws.

Reworded

The Administrator will rely on the Index as the index price to be used when determining NAV. However, determining the value of the Trust’s bitcoin using the Index is not in accordance with GAAP, and therefore is not used in the Trust’s financial statements. The Trust’s bitcoins are carried, for financial statement purposes, at fair value, as required by GAAP. The Trust determines the fair value of bitcoin based on the price provided by the bitcoin market that the Trust considers its “principal market” as of 11:59:59 PM, ET on the valuation date.date (the “Principal Market Price”). The net asset value of the Trust determined on a GAAP basis is referred to as the “Principal Market NAV” and the net asset value of the Trust per Share determined on a GAAP basis is referred to as the “Principal Market NAV per Share.”

Removed

The Sponsor identifies and determines the Fund’s principal market (or in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market) for bitcoin consistent with the application of fair value measurement framework in FASB ASC 820-10. The principal market is the market where the reporting entity would normally enter into a transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability. The principal market must be available to and be accessible to the reporting entity. The reporting entity is the Trust, on behalf of the Fund.

Reworded

NAV and NAV per Share are not measures calculated in accordance with GAAP and are not intended as a substitute for Principal Market and Principal Market NAV per Share, respectively.

Reworded

The financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements relies on estimates and assumptions that impact the Fund’s as well as the Trust’s financial position and results of operations. These estimates and assumptions affect the Fund’s as well as the Trust’s application of accounting policies. A description of the valuation of bitcoin, a critical accounting policy that is important to understanding the results of operations and financial position presented herein, is provided in the section entitled “Calculation of Net Asset Value,Value; Valuation of Bitcoin and The CF BenchmarkBenchmarks Index,” above. In addition, please refer to Note 2 to the financial statements included in this report for further discussion of the Trust’s and the Fund’s accounting policies.

Removed

On December 15, 2023, the Seed Capital Investor purchased 4,000 Shares at a per-Share price equal to $25.00 (the “Initial Seed Shares”). Delivery of the Initial Seed Shares was made on December 15, 2023. Total proceeds to the Fund from the sale of the Initial Seed Shares were $100,000. On January 8, 2024, the Initial Seed Shares were redeemed for $100,000 and the Seed Capital Investor purchased two creation units in a cash transaction comprised of a total of 100,000 Shares at a per-Share price based on 29.00000000 bitcoins per Creation Unit (or 0.00058 bitcoins per Share), for a total of 58.00000000 bitcoins (the “Seed Creation Units”). The cash proceeds to the Fund from the sale of the Seed Creation Units were used by the Fund to purchase 58.00000000 bitcoins at the price of $44,973.58 per bitcoin on January 8, 2024. The transaction and other costs incurred in connection with the Seed Creation Units were paid by the Seed Capital Investor and not borne by the Fund. Thus, the ultimate total proceeds to the Fund from the sale of the Seed Creation Units were $2,608,467.81 (an amount representing 58.00000000 bitcoins). The Shares were first listed for trading and the Fund commenced operations on January 11, 2024. The Fund had no operations prior to the commencement of operations of the Fund on January 11, 2024.

Reworded

At March 31, 2025,2026, the Custodian held 4,956.34646,302.8336 bitcoinsbitcoin on behalf of the Fund, with a market value of $411,158,674$429,409,784 (cost: $313,983,408$473,378,477) based on the Principal Market Price at the March 31, 2026 fiscal year end.

Reworded

ForResults of Operations for the Yearyear Endedended March 31, 20252026

Reworded

For the year ended March 31, 2025,2026, 7,850,0004,450,000 Shares were issued in exchange for 4,552.1726 of2,576.5193 bitcoin and 7,650,0002,100,000 Shares were redeemed in exchange for 4,433.6498 of1,215.3949 bitcoin. The Fund’s NAV per Share began the year at $40.95$48.05 and ended the year at $48.05.$39.39. The 17.34%18.02% increasedecrease in the Fund’s NAV from $40.95 at March 31, 2024 to $48.05 at March 31, 2025 to $39.39 at March 31, 2026 is directly related to the 17.51%17.87% increasedecrease in the price of bitcoin. The Fund’s NAV increaseddecreased slightly lessmore than the price of bitcoin on a percentage basis due to the Sponsor’s fee less waiver of $720,559$1,028,947 for the year.year ended March 31, 2026.

Reworded

Net realized and change in unrealized gainloss on investment in bitcoin for the year ended March 31, 2025,2026, was approximately $109,872,131$117,499,884 which includes a realized gain of $102,547$311,028 on the sale of bitcoin to pay the SponsorSponsor’s Fee,fee, net realized gain on investment in bitcoin sold for redemptions of $73,871,502$23,333,047 and net change in unrealized depreciation on investment in bitcoin of approximately $35,898,082.$141,143,959. Net realized and change in unrealized gainloss on investment in bitcoin for the year was driven by bitcoin price appreciationdepreciation from $70,596.99 per unit as of March 31, 2024 to $82,956.00 per unit as of March 31, 2025.2025 to $68,129.64 per unit as of March 31, 2026. Net increasedecrease in net assets resulting from operations was approximately $109,151,572$118,528,831 for the year ended March 31, 2025,2026, which consisted of the net realized and change in unrealized gainloss on investment in bitcoin of $109,872,131,$117,499,884, offsetin byaddition to the SponsorSponsor’s Fee less waiverfee of $720,559.$1,028,947. Net assets increased to approximately $410,857,343$429,340,099 on March 31, 2025.2026. The increase in net assets primarily resulted from the aforementioned bitcoin price appreciation and net capital share transactions of approximately of$137,011,587, $40,195,334.and was partially offset by the aforementioned bitcoin price depreciation.

Added

Results of Operations for the year ended March 31, 2025

Removed

For the Period January 11, 2024 (Commencement of operations) to March 31, 2024 At March 31, 2024, the Custodian held 4,842.9986 of bitcoin on behalf of the Fund, with a market value of $341,901,126 (cost: $280,623,942) based on the Principal Market Price at period end.

Reworded

For the periodyear January 11, 2024 (Commencement of operations) toended March 31, 2024,2025, 8,250,0007,850,000 Shares were issued in exchange for 4,784.9986 of4,552.1726 bitcoin and no7,650,000 Shares were redeemed.redeemed in exchange for 4,433.6498 bitcoin. The Fund’s NAV per Share began the periodyear at $26.65$40.95 and ended the periodyear at $40.95.$48.05. The 17.34% increase in the Fund’s NAV perfrom Share$40.95 wasat dueMarch 31, 2024 to a$48.05 higherat March 31, 2025 is directly related to the 17.51% increase in the price of bitcoin. The Fund’s NAV increased slightly less than the price of bitcoin ofon $70,596.99a atpercentage periodbasis end,due whichto representedthe anSponsor’s increasefee less waiver of 53.62%$720,559 fromfor $45,956.16the at January 11, 2024.year.

Added

Net realized and change in unrealized gain on investment in bitcoin for the year ended March 31, 2025, was approximately $109,872,131 which includes a realized gain of $102,547 on the sale of bitcoin to pay the Sponsor’s fee, net realized gain on investment in bitcoin sold for redemptions of $73,871,502 and net change in unrealized appreciation on investment in bitcoin of approximately $35,898,082. Net realized and change in unrealized gain on investment in bitcoin for the year was driven by bitcoin price appreciation from $70,596.99 per unit as of March 31, 2024 to $82,956.00 per unit as of March 31, 2025. Net increase in net assets resulting from operations was approximately $109,151,572 for the year ended March 31, 2025, which consisted of the net realized and change in unrealized gain on investment in bitcoin of $109,872,131, offset by the Sponsor’s fee less waiver of $720,559. Net assets increased to approximately $410,857,343 on March 31, 2025. The increase in net assets primarily resulted from the aforementioned bitcoin price appreciation and net capital share transactions of approximately $40,195,334.

Removed

The change in net assets from operations for the period January 11, 2024 (Commencement of operations) to March 31, 2024 was $61,220,174, which was due to (i) the Sponsor’s Fee of $54,280, (ii) Less waiver and reimbursement $54,259 and (iii) a net change in unrealized appreciation on investment in bitcoin of $61,220,195.

Reworded

The Fund’s only ordinary recurring expense is expected to be the Sponsor’s fee. In exchange for the Sponsor’s fee, the Sponsor has agreed to assume the ordinary fees and expenses incurred by the Fund, including but not limited to the following: the fees charged by the Administrator, the Marketing Agent, the Custodians and the Trustee, Cboe BZX Exchange listing fees, typical maintenance and transaction fees of the DTC, SEC registration fees, printing and mailing costs, tax reporting fees, audit fees, license fees and expenses, and up to $500,000 per annum in ordinary legal fees and expenses. The Sponsor will also paypaid the costs of the Fund’s organization and the initial offering costs, and may not seek reimbursement of such costs. The Sponsor is not required to pay any extraordinary or non-routine expenses.

Reworded

The Sponsor’s fee is accrued daily at an annualized rate equal to 0.19% (i.e., 0.19%/365 days) of the net asset value of the Fund and is payable at least quarterly in arrears in U.S. dollars or in-kind or any combination thereof.dollars. The Sponsor may, at its sole discretion and from time to time, waive all or a portion of the Sponsor’s fee for stated periods of time. The Sponsor is under no obligation to waive any portion of its fees and any such waiver shall create no obligation to waive any such fees during any period not covered by the waiver. There are no specific circumstances under which the Sponsor has determined to waive its fees. If the Sponsor decides to waive all or a portion of the Sponsor's Fee, Shareholders will be notified of any such waiver in a prospectus supplement, in the Fund's periodic reports and/or on the Fund's website. The Fund will sell bitcoin as needed to pay the Sponsor’s fee. For a period from January 12, 2024 to August 2, 2024, the Sponsor waived a portion of the Sponsor’s Fee so that the Sponsor’s Fee after the fee waiver would be equal to 0.00% of the net asset value of the Fund for the first $10.0 billion of the Fund’s assets. Prior to the implementation of the waiver, for the one day period January 11, 2024, the Fund accrued the Sponsor fee of 0.29% ($21). Fees accruedrecognized for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20252026 were ($720,559) after waiver.$1,028,947. In the future, if the Sponsor decides to waive all or a portion of the Sponsor’s Fee,fee, Shareholders will be notified in a prospectus supplement, in the Fund’s periodic reports and/or on the Sponsor’s website for the Fund.

Reworded

The Fund will sell bitcoin on an as-needed basis to pay the Sponsor’s fee. The Fund bears transaction costs, including any bitcoin network fees or other similar transaction fees, in connection with any sales of bitcoin necessary to pay the Sponsor’s fee, as well as other Fund expenses (if any) that are not assumed by the Sponsor (expenses assumed by the Sponsor are specified above). Any bitcoin network fees and similar transaction fees incurred in connection with the creation or redemption of Creation Units are borne by the Authorized Participant.

Reworded

AtAs of March 31, 20252026 and 2024,2025, neither the Fund as well asnor the Trust do not havehad any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Removed

Historical Bitcoin Prices

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-08-14 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-02-17 (period ending 2025-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

0new paragraphs
36removed paragraphs
1reworded paragraphs
5,548 → 119words in section

The section in the latest 10-Q reads in full:

You should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in our 2026 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the Trust and the Fund. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

Removed heading “Prices of bitcoin may be affected due to stablecoins (including Tether and USDC), the activities of stablecoin issuers and their regulatory treatment”

Removed heading “Disruptions or other problems in the supply chain for bitcoin mining hardware and difficulties in obtaining new hardware could cause harm to the Bitcoin network”

Removed heading “If regulators or public utilities take actions that restrict or otherwise impact mining activities, such actions could result in decreased security of a digital asset network, including the Bitcoin network, which could adversely affect the value of the Shares”

Removed heading “Digital asset treasury companies risk.”

Removed heading “Disruptions or other problems in the supply chain for bitcoin mining hardware and difficulties in obtaining new hardware could cause harm to the Bitcoin network.”

Removed heading “The trading prices of many digital assets, including bitcoin, have experienced extreme volatility in recent periods and may continue to do so. Extreme volatility in the future, including further declines in the trading prices of bitcoin, could have a material adverse effect on the value of the Shares and the Shares could lose all or substantially all of their value.”

Removed heading “Due to the unregulated nature and lack of transparency surrounding the operations of digital asset exchanges, which may experience fraud, manipulation, security failures or operational problems, as well as the wider bitcoin market, the value of bitcoin and, consequently, the value of the Shares may be adversely affected, causing losses to Shareholders.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: bankruptcy, department of justice, ftc, fine
“Risks related to exchange bankruptcy, failure or closure, including as a result of criminal fraud, cyber attacks or other security breaches. In addition, over the past several years, some digital asset exchanges have been closed, including due to fraud and manipulative activity, business failure or security breaches. In many of these instances, the customers of such digital asset exchanges were not compensated or made whole for the partial or complete losses of their account balances in such digital asset exchanges. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: bankruptcy, department of justice, ftc, liquidity
“Extreme volatility may persist and the value of the Shares may significantly decline in the future without recovery. The digital asset markets may still be experiencing a bubble or may experience a bubble again in the future. For example, in the first half of 2022, each of Celsius Network, Voyager Digital Ltd., and Three Arrows Capital declared bankruptcy, resulting in a loss of confidence in participants of the digital asset ecosystem and negative publicity surrounding digital assets more broadly. In November 2022, FTX Trading Ltd. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: default, tariff, china
“There are a small number of major suppliers of bitcoin mining hardware globally, and a significant amount of bitcoin mining hardware manufacturing is located in China. Mining hardware manufacturers may fail to supply the mining hardware due to their inability to manufacture sufficient mining hardware, whether due to shortages of components or resources such as semiconductors, or changes of laws and trade restrictions (including export/import restrictions, quotas or tariffs), or due to insolvency, or non-performance or default on their contracts. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: default, tariff, china
“There are a small number of major suppliers of bitcoin mining hardware globally, and a significant amount of bitcoin mining hardware manufacturing is located in China. Mining hardware manufacturers may fail to supply the mining hardware due to their inability to manufacture sufficient mining hardware, whether due to shortages of components or resources such as semiconductors, or changes of laws and trade restrictions (including export/import restrictions, quotas or tariffs), or due to insolvency, or non-performance or default on their contracts. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: fine, breach
“Other academics and market observers have put forth evidence to support claims that manipulative trading activity has occurred on certain bitcoin exchanges. For example, in a 2017 paper titled “Price Manipulation in the Bitcoin Ecosystem” sponsored by the Interdisciplinary Cyber Research Center at Tel Aviv University, a group of researchers used publicly available trading data, as well as leaked transaction data from a 2014 Mt. Gox security breach, to identify and analyze the impact of “suspicious trading activity” on Mt. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: supply chain
“Disruptions or other problems in the supply chain for bitcoin mining hardware and difficulties in obtaining new hardware could cause harm to the Bitcoin network.”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (37)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

You should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025,2026, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. Except as noted below, thereThere have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in our 20252026 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Removed

Prices of bitcoin may be affected due to stablecoins (including Tether and USDC), the activities of stablecoin issuers and their regulatory treatment

Removed

While the Fund does not invest in stablecoins, it may nonetheless be exposed to risks that stablecoins pose for the bitcoin market and other digital asset markets. Stablecoins are digital assets designed to have a stable value over time as compared to typically volatile digital assets and are typically marketed as being pegged to a fiat currency, such as the U.S. dollar, at a certain value. Although the prices of stablecoins are intended to be stable, their market value may fluctuate. This volatility has in the past apparently impacted the price of bitcoin. Stablecoins are a relatively new phenomenon, and it is impossible to know all of the risks that they could pose to participants in the bitcoin market. Like CBDCs, stablecoins could compete with, or replace, bitcoin and other digital assets as a medium of exchange or store of value. In addition, some have argued that some stablecoins, particularly Tether, are improperly issued without sufficient backing in a way that, when the stablecoin is used to pay for bitcoin, could cause artificial rather than genuine demand for bitcoin, artificially inflating the price of bitcoin, and also argue that those associated with certain stablecoins may be involved in laundering money.

Removed

USDC is a reserve-backed stablecoin issued by Circle Internet Financial that is commonly used as a method of payment in digital asset markets, including the bitcoin market. While USDC is designed to maintain a stable value at 1 U.S. dollar at all times, on March 10, 2023, the value of USDC fell below $1.00 for multiple days after Circle Internet Financial disclosed that US$3.3 billion of the USDC reserves were held at Silicon Valley Bank, which had entered FDIC receivership earlier that day. Stablecoins are reliant on the U.S. banking system and U.S. treasuries, and the failure of either to function normally could impede the function of stablecoins, and therefore could adversely affect the value of the Shares.

Removed

Given the foundational role that stablecoins play in global digital asset markets, their fundamental liquidity can have a dramatic impact on the broader digital asset market, including the market for bitcoin. A significant portion of the digital asset market continues to depend on stablecoins such as Tether and USDC. As such, any disruption in the operation or perceived stability of these stablecoins such as a disorderly de-pegging event or a loss of market confidence resulting in a run on reserves could lead to substantial market volatility across digital assets more broadly.

Removed

Additional risks such as operational failures (e.g., technical issues that prevent settlement), concerns regarding the adequacy or transparency of reserve assets backing stablecoins, the use of unbacked or undercollateralized stablecoins in potentially manipulative trading practices and regulatory scrutiny of stablecoin issuers or intermediaries, including exchanges that facilitate stablecoin transactions, may also adversely affect market confidence and liquidity. Further, these risks are underscored by recent legislative developments. On July 18, 2025, the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act of 2025 (“GENIUS Act”) was enacted, establishing a federal regulatory framework for payment stablecoins. The GENIUS Act will become effective on July 18, 2028. The GENUIS Act prohibits the issuance or use of payment stablecoins unless the issuer obtains a qualifying license and complies with a range of regulatory requirements, including reserve backing with liquid assets, redemption rights, governance standards, and operational transparency. The GENIUS Act also restricts the payment of interest on stablecoins and imposes oversight on both bank and nonbank issuers. The enactment of the GENIUS Act, or the removal or migration of prominent stablecoins from the Bitcoin network, could reduce the willingness of market participants to engage in digital asset transactions that rely on stablecoins, diminish liquidity in the bitcoin market, and adversely affect the price of bitcoin. Any such developments could, in turn, materially and adversely impact the value of the Shares.

Removed

Disruptions or other problems in the supply chain for bitcoin mining hardware and difficulties in obtaining new hardware could cause harm to the Bitcoin network

Removed

Manufacture, assembly and delivery of hardware and components for mining operations can be complex and protracted processes, in the course of which various problems could arise, including disruptions or delays in the supply chain, product quality control issues, as well as other external factors.

Removed

Mining operations can ordinarily only be profitable if the costs associated with bitcoin mining, including hardware costs, are lower than the price of bitcoin itself. In the course of the normal operation of bitcoin mining facilities, miners and other critical equipment and materials related to data center construction and maintenance, such as containers, switch gears, transformers and cables, will experience ordinary wear and tear and may also face more significant malfunctions. Declines in the condition of miners and other hardware will require bitcoin miners, over time, to repair or replace those miners.

Removed

Additionally, as the technology evolves, miners may be required to acquire newer models of mining hardware and machines to remain competitive in the market. Any upgrading process may require substantial capital investment, and miners may face challenges in doing so on a timely and cost-effective basis. The business of bitcoin miners will be subject to limitations inherent within the supply chain of their mining hardware equipment and components, including competitive, governmental, and legal limitations, and other events. For example, many miners will significantly rely on foreign imports to obtain mining hardware equipment and materials. Any global trade disruption, introductions of tariffs, trade barriers and bilateral trade frictions, together with any potential downturns in the global economy resulting therefrom, could adversely affect the necessary supply chains for mining hardware. Depending on the magnitude of such effects on the mining hardware supply chain, shipments of parts for mining hardware, or new mining hardware and equipment, may be delayed.

Removed

There are a small number of major suppliers of bitcoin mining hardware globally, and a significant amount of bitcoin mining hardware manufacturing is located in China. Mining hardware manufacturers may fail to supply the mining hardware due to their inability to manufacture sufficient mining hardware, whether due to shortages of components or resources such as semiconductors, or changes of laws and trade restrictions (including export/import restrictions, quotas or tariffs), or due to insolvency, or non-performance or default on their contracts. Trade policies such as export/import restrictions, quotas or tariffs may reduce the ability of bitcoin mining hardware suppliers to supply miners with bitcoin mining hardware or create a shortage or lack of components necessary for their manufacture or repair. If bitcoin miners are unable to source mining hardware from those suppliers (for example due to overwhelming global demand for bitcoin miners, or due to trade restrictions, or other causes) at commercially reasonable prices, or at all, and replacement or substitute sources of bitcoin mining hardware prove to be unavailable, there could be a negative impact on bitcoin mining globally. These could affect the Bitcoin network by making it more difficult for transactions to be confirmed, increase transaction costs, or affect the Bitcoin network’s security, among other negative effects, any of which could negatively affect the value of bitcoin and consequently the Shares.

Removed

Further, the first-generation application specific integrated circuit (“ASIC”) chips and other critical components for mining equipment may be subject to price fluctuations or shortages. For example, the ASIC chip is the key component of a mining machine as it determines the efficiency of the device. The production of ASIC chips typically requires highly sophisticated silicon wafers, which currently only a small number of fabrication facilities, or wafer foundries, in the world are capable of producing. There have been previous microchip shortages which led to price fluctuations and disruption in the supply of key bitcoin mining hardware components. ASIC chips have recently been subject to supply and demand fluctuations, significant price increases and shortages. Shortages of ASIC chips could create problems in the supply chain for bitcoin mining equipment, negatively affecting the Bitcoin network by making it more difficult for transactions to be confirmed or increasing transaction costs, or even affecting network security, which again could cause the value of bitcoin and the Shares to decline.

Removed

If regulators or public utilities take actions that restrict or otherwise impact mining activities, such actions could result in decreased security of a digital asset network, including the Bitcoin network, which could adversely affect the value of the Shares

Removed

Concerns have been raised about the electricity required to secure and maintain digital asset networks. Although measuring the electricity consumed by the process of securing and maintaining digital asset networks is difficult because these operations are performed by various machines with varying levels of efficiency, the process consumes a significant amount of energy. Driven by concerns around energy consumption and the impact on public utility companies, various states and cities have implemented, or are considering implementing, moratoriums on mining activity in their jurisdictions.

Removed

The operations of digital asset networks can consume significant amounts of electricity, which may have a negative environmental impact and give rise to public opinion against allowing, or government regulations restricting, the use of electricity for mining operations, in the case of proof-of-work networks. Additionally, miners on proof-of-work networks may be forced to cease operations during an electricity shortage or power outage, or if electricity prices increase where the mining activities are performed.

Removed

Digital asset treasury companies risk.

Removed

In recent times, a number of companies engaged in businesses outside the digital assets industry have begun to hold their corporate treasuries in digital assets instead of in fiat currency (“digital asset treasury companies”). In some cases, these companies have raised funds through financing or securities offerings and applied the proceeds to purchase digital assets, including bitcoin.

Removed

Digital asset treasury companies are a relatively new phenomenon and it is difficult to predict their long-term sustainability, and therefore their impact to digital asset markets, and to the Fund. Digital asset treasury companies may increase procyclical dynamics in the market because they may purchase digital assets, such as bitcoin, when prices are rising and they may in certain circumstances be forced to sell such assets when prices are decreasing, potentially causing downward pressure on bitcoin prices in a falling market (causing prices to fall faster than they otherwise would). Digital asset treasury companies could cause greater volatility in digital asset markets, including markets for bitcoin. Negative events or sentiment surrounding digital asset treasury companies could affect the market for bitcoin. The foregoing or similar events involving digital asset treasury companies could adversely affect holders of Shares in the Fund.

Removed

Disruptions or other problems in the supply chain for bitcoin mining hardware and difficulties in obtaining new hardware could cause harm to the Bitcoin network.

Removed

Manufacture, assembly and delivery of hardware and components for mining operations can be complex and protracted processes, in the course of which various problems could arise, including disruptions or delays in the supply chain, product quality control issues, as well as other external factors.

Removed

Mining operations can ordinarily only be profitable if the costs associated with bitcoin mining, including hardware costs, are lower than the price of bitcoin itself. In the course of the normal operation of bitcoin mining facilities, miners and other critical equipment and materials related to data center construction and maintenance, such as containers, switch gears, transformers and cables, will experience ordinary wear and tear and may also face more significant malfunctions. Declines in the condition of miners and other hardware will require bitcoin miners, over time, to repair or replace those miners.

Removed

Additionally, as the technology evolves, miners may be required to acquire newer models of mining hardware and machines to remain competitive in the market. Any upgrading process may require substantial capital investment, and miners may face challenges in doing so on a timely and cost-effective basis. The business of bitcoin miners will be subject to limitations inherent within the supply chain of their mining hardware equipment and components, including competitive, governmental, and legal limitations, and other events.

Removed

For example, many miners will significantly rely on foreign imports to obtain mining hardware equipment and materials. Any global trade disruption, introductions of tariffs, trade barriers and bilateral trade frictions, together with any potential downturns in the global economy resulting therefrom, could adversely affect the necessary supply chains for mining hardware. Depending on the magnitude of such effects on the mining hardware supply chain, shipments of parts for mining hardware, or new mining hardware and equipment, may be delayed.

Removed

There are a small number of major suppliers of bitcoin mining hardware globally, and a significant amount of bitcoin mining hardware manufacturing is located in China. Mining hardware manufacturers may fail to supply the mining hardware due to their inability to manufacture sufficient mining hardware, whether due to shortages of components or resources such as semiconductors, or changes of laws and trade restrictions (including export/import restrictions, quotas or tariffs), or due to insolvency, or non-performance or default on their contracts. Trade policies such as export/import restrictions, quotas or tariffs may reduce the ability of bitcoin mining hardware suppliers to supply miners with bitcoin mining hardware or create a shortage or lack of components necessary for their manufacture or repair. If bitcoin miners are unable to source mining hardware from those suppliers (for example due to overwhelming global demand for bitcoin miners, or due to trade restrictions, or other causes) at commercially reasonable prices, or at all, and replacement or substitute sources of bitcoin mining hardware prove to be unavailable, there could be a negative impact on bitcoin mining globally. These could affect the Bitcoin network by making it more difficult for transactions to be confirmed, increase transaction costs, or affect the Bitcoin network’s security, among other negative effects, any of which could negatively affect the value of bitcoin and consequently the Shares.

Removed

Further, the first-generation application specific integrated circuit (“ASIC”) chips and other critical components for mining equipment may be subject to price fluctuations or shortages. For example, the ASIC chip is the key component of a mining machine as it determines the efficiency of the device. The production of ASIC chips typically requires highly sophisticated silicon wafers, which currently only a small number of fabrication facilities, or wafer foundries, in the world are capable of producing. There have been previous microchip shortages which led to price fluctuations and disruption in the supply of key bitcoin mining hardware components. ASIC chips have recently been subject to supply and demand fluctuations, significant price increases and shortages. Shortages of ASIC chips could create problems in the supply chain for bitcoin mining equipment, negatively affecting the Bitcoin network by making it more difficult for transactions to be confirmed or increasing transaction costs, or even affecting network security, which again could cause the value of bitcoin and the Shares to decline.

Removed

The trading prices of many digital assets, including bitcoin, have experienced extreme volatility in recent periods and may continue to do so. Extreme volatility in the future, including further declines in the trading prices of bitcoin, could have a material adverse effect on the value of the Shares and the Shares could lose all or substantially all of their value.

Removed

The trading prices of many digital assets, including bitcoin, have experienced extreme volatility in recent periods and may continue to do so. For instance, the average one-year trailing volatility of bitcoin over the past ten years to date remains elevated at 81%. There were steep increases in the value of certain digital assets, including bitcoin, over the course of 2021, and multiple market observers asserted that digital assets were experiencing a “bubble.” These increases were followed by steep drawdowns throughout 2022 in digital asset trading prices, including for bitcoin. In the 2021-2022 cycle, the price of bitcoin peaked at $67,734 and bottomed at $15,632, marking a steep 77% drawdown. These episodes of rapid price appreciation followed by steep drawdowns have occurred multiple times throughout bitcoin’s history, including in 2011, 2013-2014, and 2017-2018, before repeating again in 2021-2022. As of the end of the reporting period covered herein, digital asset prices have continued to fluctuate. For example, bitcoin lost approximately 14% of its value according to some sources in mid-October 2025 as part of wider digital asset market turmoil, widely attributed to global trade tensions, which triggered a number of dislocations in the digital asset market (the “October 2025 Flash Crash”), including liquidations of up to $20 billion in collateral in the form of various digital assets (including, but not limited to, bitcoin) securing trades (particularly perpetual futures contracts and various forms of financing transactions), along with reported service interruptions, halted orders, forced unwinding of trades, and other issues, across centralized and decentralized exchanges.

Removed

Extreme volatility may persist and the value of the Shares may significantly decline in the future without recovery. The digital asset markets may still be experiencing a bubble or may experience a bubble again in the future. For example, in the first half of 2022, each of Celsius Network, Voyager Digital Ltd., and Three Arrows Capital declared bankruptcy, resulting in a loss of confidence in participants of the digital asset ecosystem and negative publicity surrounding digital assets more broadly. In November 2022, FTX Trading Ltd. (“FTX”), one of the largest digital asset exchanges by volume at the time, halted customer withdrawals amid rumors of the company’s liquidity issues and likely insolvency, which were subsequently corroborated by its CEO. Shortly thereafter, FTX’s CEO resigned and FTX and many of its affiliates filed for bankruptcy in the United States, while other affiliates have entered insolvency, liquidation, or similar proceedings around the globe, following which the U.S. Department of Justice brought criminal fraud and other charges, and the SEC and CFTC brought civil securities and commodities fraud charges, against certain of FTX’s and its affiliates’ senior executives, including its former CEO. In addition, several other entities in the digital asset industry filed for bankruptcy following FTX’s bankruptcy filing, such as BlockFi Inc. and Genesis Global Capital, LLC (“Genesis”). In response to these events (collectively, the “2022 Events”), the digital asset markets have experienced extreme price volatility and other entities in the digital asset industry have been, and may continue to be, negatively affected, further undermining confidence in the digital asset markets. These events have also negatively impacted the liquidity of the digital asset markets as certain entities affiliated with FTX engaged in significant trading activity. If the liquidity of the digital asset markets continues to be negatively impacted by these events, digital asset prices, including bitcoin, may continue to experience significant volatility or price declines and confidence in the digital asset markets may be further undermined. In addition, regulatory and enforcement scrutiny increased in response to these events, and could further increase in response to similar events in the future, including federal as well as state regulators and authorities.

Removed

The price of some digital assets, including bitcoin, has fluctuated significantly following the election of Donald Trump as president of the United States. Industry participants generally expect the administration to continue to take a constructive approach toward the digital assets industry. Through his executive orders, President Trump has indicated that the administration will work toward providing greater regulatory clarity and certainty for emerging technologies, including blockchain technology and digital assets, thereby fostering their development. Similarly, the digital assets industry expects favorable legislation from the new U.S. Congress as certain members have expressed interest in advancing digital asset specific legislation. To the extent market expectations about future activity by the administration or Congress lead digital asset prices and valuations to increase, there can be no assurance such expectations will be fulfilled, or that digital asset prices will rise or maintain their current levels. Some commentators have referred to the digital asset market post-President Trump's election as a bubble. There can be no assurance that such a bubble does not exist. The failure of the administration and Congress to provide greater regulatory clarity and certainty for blockchain technology and digital assets, such as through promulgating a regulatory framework governing the issuance and operation of digital assets that meets industry expectations, could lead to a decline in digital assets prices, including bitcoin. Such a decline could cause a decline in the value of the Shares and cause Shareholders to suffer losses. Moreover, there can be no assurance that political dynamics and sentiments toward the digital asset industry, or market perceptions of those sentiments, will not shift over time.

Removed

Extreme volatility in the future, including further declines in the trading prices of bitcoin, could have a material adverse effect on the value of the Shares and the Shares could lose all or substantially all of their value. The Fund is not actively managed and will not take any actions to take advantage, or mitigate the impacts, of volatility in the price of bitcoin.

Removed

Due to the unregulated nature and lack of transparency surrounding the operations of digital asset exchanges, which may experience fraud, manipulation, security failures or operational problems, as well as the wider bitcoin market, the value of bitcoin and, consequently, the value of the Shares may be adversely affected, causing losses to Shareholders.

Removed

Risk of loss of market confidence due to lack of established regulatory framework. Digital asset exchanges are relatively new and, in some cases, may be unregulated or subject to regulation by a relevant jurisdiction but potentially non-compliant with such regulations. Many operate outside the United States. Furthermore, while many prominent digital asset exchanges provide the public with significant information regarding their ownership structure, management teams, corporate practices and regulatory compliance, many digital asset exchanges do not provide this information. Digital asset exchanges may not be subject to, or may not comply with, regulation in a similar manner as other regulated trading platforms, such as national securities exchanges or designated contract markets. As a result, the marketplace may lose confidence in digital asset exchanges, including prominent exchanges that handle a significant volume of bitcoin trading.

Removed

Risk of manipulative activity (e.g., wash trading, front running or other fraudulent practices). Many digital asset exchanges are unlicensed, may be unregulated or subject to regulation by a relevant jurisdiction but potentially non-compliant with such regulations, operate without extensive supervision by governmental authorities, and do not provide the public with significant information regarding their ownership structure, management team, corporate practices, cybersecurity, and regulatory compliance. In particular, those located outside the United States may be subject to significantly less stringent regulatory and compliance requirements in their local jurisdictions, and may take the position that they are not subject to laws and regulations that would apply to a national securities exchange or designated contract market in the United States, or may, as a practical matter, be beyond the ambit of U.S. regulators. As a result, trading activity on or reported by these digital asset exchanges is generally significantly less regulated than trading in regulated U.S. securities and commodities markets, and may reflect behavior that would be prohibited in regulated U.S. trading venues. For example, in 2019 there were reports claiming that 80.95% of bitcoin trading volume on digital asset exchanges was false or noneconomic in nature, with specific focus on unregulated exchanges located outside of the United States. Such reports alleged that certain overseas exchanges have displayed suspicious trading activity suggestive of a variety of manipulative or fraudulent practices, such as fake or artificial trading volume or trading volume based on non-economic “wash trading” (where offsetting trades are entered into for other than bona fide reasons, such as the desire to inflate reported trading volumes), and attributed such manipulative or fraudulent behavior to motives like the incentive to attract listing fees from token issuers who seek the most liquid and high-volume exchanges on which to list their coins.

Removed

Other academics and market observers have put forth evidence to support claims that manipulative trading activity has occurred on certain bitcoin exchanges. For example, in a 2017 paper titled “Price Manipulation in the Bitcoin Ecosystem” sponsored by the Interdisciplinary Cyber Research Center at Tel Aviv University, a group of researchers used publicly available trading data, as well as leaked transaction data from a 2014 Mt. Gox security breach, to identify and analyze the impact of “suspicious trading activity” on Mt. Gox between February and November 2013, which, according to the authors, caused the price of bitcoin to increase from around $150 to more than $1,000 over a two-month period. In August 2017, it was reported that a trader or group of traders nicknamed “Spoofy” was placing large orders on Bitfinex without actually executing them, presumably in order to influence other investors into buying or selling by creating a false appearance that greater demand existed in the market. In December 2017, an anonymous blogger (publishing under the pseudonym Bitfinex’d) cited publicly available trading data to support his or her claim that a trading bot nicknamed “Picasso” was pursuing a paint-the-tape-style manipulation strategy by buying and selling bitcoin and bitcoin cash between affiliated accounts in order to create the appearance of substantial trading activity and thereby influence the price of such assets. Even in the United States, there have been allegations of wash trading even on regulated venues. Any actual or perceived false trading in the digital asset exchange market, and any other fraudulent or manipulative acts and practices, could adversely affect the value of bitcoin and/or negatively affect the market perception of bitcoin.

Removed

The bitcoin market globally and in the United States is not subject to comparable regulatory guardrails as exist in regulated securities markets. Furthermore, many bitcoin trading venues lack certain safeguards put in place by exchanges for more traditional assets to enhance the stability of trading on the exchanges and prevent “flash crashes,” such as limit-down circuit breakers, as demonstrated by the October 2025 Flash Crash. As a result, the prices of bitcoin on trading venues may be subject to larger and/or more frequent sudden declines than assets traded on more traditional exchanges. Tools to detect and deter fraudulent or manipulative trading activities such as market manipulation, front-running of trades, and wash-trading may not be available to or employed by digital asset exchanges, or may not exist at all. The SEC has identified possible sources of fraud and manipulation in the bitcoin market generally, including, among others (1) “wash trading”; (2) persons with a dominant position in bitcoin manipulating bitcoin pricing; (3) hacking of the Bitcoin network and trading platforms; (4) malicious control of the Bitcoin network; (5) trading based on material, non-public information (for example, plans of market participants to significantly increase or decrease their holdings in bitcoin, new sources of demand for bitcoin or other events which could affect the price of the bitcoin) or based on the dissemination of false and misleading information; (6) manipulative activity involving purported “stablecoins,” including Tether (for more information, see “Risk Factors-Risk Factors Related to Digital Assets-Prices of bitcoin may be affected due to stablecoins (including Tether and US Dollar Coin (“USDC”)), the activities of stablecoin issuers and their regulatory treatment”); and (7) fraud and manipulation at bitcoin trading platforms. The effect of potential market manipulation, front-running, wash-trading, and other fraudulent or manipulative trading practices may inflate the volumes actually present in crypto market and/or cause distortions in price, which could adversely affect the Fund or cause losses to Shareholders.

Removed

Risks related to exchange bankruptcy, failure or closure, including as a result of criminal fraud, cyber attacks or other security breaches. In addition, over the past several years, some digital asset exchanges have been closed, including due to fraud and manipulative activity, business failure or security breaches. In many of these instances, the customers of such digital asset exchanges were not compensated or made whole for the partial or complete losses of their account balances in such digital asset exchanges. While, generally speaking, smaller digital asset exchanges are less likely to have the infrastructure and capitalization that make larger digital asset exchanges more stable, larger digital asset exchanges are more likely to be appealing targets for hackers and malware and their shortcomings or ultimate failures are more likely to have contagion effects on the digital asset ecosystem, and therefore may be more likely to be targets of regulatory enforcement action. For example, the collapse of Mt. Gox, which filed for bankruptcy protection in Japan in late February 2014, demonstrated that even the largest digital asset exchanges could be subject to abrupt failure with consequences for both users of digital asset exchanges and the digital asset industry as a whole. In particular, in the two weeks that followed the February 7, 2014 halt of bitcoin withdrawals from Mt. Gox, the value of one bitcoin fell on other exchanges from around $795 on February 6, 2014 to $578 on February 20, 2014. Additionally, in January 2015, Bitstamp announced that approximately 19,000 bitcoin had been stolen from its operational or “hot” wallets. Further, in August 2016, it was reported that almost 120,000 bitcoins worth around $78 million were stolen from Bitfinex, a large digital asset exchange. The value of bitcoin and other digital assets immediately decreased over 10% following reports of the theft at Bitfinex. Regulatory enforcement actions have followed, such as in July 2017, when FinCEN assessed a $110 million fine against BTC-E, a now defunct digital asset exchange, for facilitating crimes such as drug sales and ransomware attacks. In addition, in December 2017, Yapian, the operator of Seoul-based cryptocurrency exchange Youbit, suspended digital asset trading and filed for bankruptcy following a hack that resulted in a loss of 17% of Yapian’s assets. Following the hack, Youbit users were allowed to withdraw approximately 75% of the digital assets in their exchange accounts, with any potential further distributions to be made following Yapian’s pending bankruptcy proceedings. In addition, in January 2018, the Japanese digital asset exchange, Coincheck, was hacked, resulting in losses of approximately $535 million, and in February 2018, the Italian digital asset exchange, Bitgrail, was hacked, resulting in approximately $170 million in losses. In May 2019, one of the world’s largest digital asset exchanges, Binance, was hacked, resulting in losses of approximately $40 million. In November 2022, FTX Trading Ltd. (“FTX”), one of the largest digital asset exchanges by volume at the time, halted customer withdrawals amid rumors of the company’s liquidity issues and likely insolvency, which were subsequently corroborated by its CEO. Shortly thereafter, FTX’s CEO resigned and FTX and many of its affiliates filed for bankruptcy in the United States, while other affiliates have entered insolvency, liquidation, or similar proceedings around the globe, following which the U.S. Department of Justice brought criminal fraud and other charges, and the SEC and CFTC brought civil securities and commodities fraud charges, against certain of FTX’s and its affiliates’ senior executives, including its former CEO. Around the same time, there were reports that approximately $300-600 million of digital assets were removed from FTX and the full facts remain unknown, including whether such removal was the result of a hack, theft, insider activity, or other improper behavior. On February 21, 2025, Bybit, a centralized platform for exchanging digital assets, announced that more than $1.4 billion in ether had been stolen from its platform. Hackers were able to manipulate Bybit’s transfer process to authorize and complete the illicit transaction. The incident has resulted in renewed concerns over the security of digital asset platforms.

Removed

Reputational harm and related industry contagion effects may exacerbate negative events in the digital asset markets or digital exchanges. Negative perception, a lack of stability and standardized regulation in the digital asset markets and the closure or temporary shutdown of digital asset exchanges due to fraud, business failure, security breaches or government mandated regulation, and associated losses by customers, may reduce confidence in the Bitcoin network and result in greater volatility or decreases in the prices of bitcoin. Furthermore, the closure or temporary shutdown of a digital asset exchange used in calculating the Index may result in a loss of confidence in the Fund’s ability to determine its NAV on a daily basis. The potential consequences of a digital asset exchange’s failure could adversely affect the value of the Shares and may cause the Fund to lose substantial value.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

3new paragraphs
5removed paragraphs
20reworded paragraphs
3,894 → 3,203words in section

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text
“Net realized and unrealized gain on investment in bitcoin for the nine months ended December 31, 2024, was approximately $180,685,417 which includes a realized loss of $1,920 on the sale of bitcoin to pay the Sponsor Fee, net realized gain on investment in bitcoin sold for redemption of $1,659,645 and net change in unrealized appreciation on investment in bitcoin of approximately $179,027,692. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“Net realized and unrealized gain on investment in bitcoin for the three months ended December 31, 2024, was approximately $214,180,379 which includes a realized gain of $927 on the sale of bitcoin to pay the Sponsor Fee, net realized gain on investment in bitcoin sold for redemptions of $2,813,792 and net change in unrealized appreciation on investment in bitcoin of approximately $211,365,660. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

The Sponsor’s fee is accrued daily at an annualized rate equal to 0.19% (i.e., 0.19%/365 days) of the net asset value of the Fund and is payable at least quarterly in arrears in U.S. dollars. The Sponsor may, at its sole discretion and from time to time, waive all or a portion of the Sponsor’s fee for stated periods of time. The Sponsor is under no obligation to waive any portion of its fees and any such waiver shall create no obligation to waive any such fees during any period not covered by the waiver. There are no specific circumstances under which the Sponsor has determined to waive its fees. If the Sponsor decides to waive all or a portion of the Sponsor’s Fee, Shareholders will be notified of any such waiver in a prospectus supplement, in the Fund’s periodic reports and/or on the Fund’s website. The Fund will sell bitcoin as needed to pay the Sponsor’s fee. The Fund bears transaction costs, including any bitcoin network fees or other similar transaction fees, in connection with any sales of bitcoin necessary to pay the Sponsor’s fee, as well as other Fund expenses (if any) that are not assumed by the Sponsor (expenses assumed by the Sponsor are specified above). Any bitcoin network fees and similar transaction fees incurred in connection with the creation or redemption of Creation Units are borne by the Authorized Participant. For a period from January 12, 2024 to August 2, 2024, the Sponsor waived a portion of theThe Sponsor’s Fee so that the Sponsor’s Fee after the fee waiver would be equal to 0.00% of the net asset value of the Fundaccrued for the firstthree $10.0 billion of the Fund’s assets. Prior to the implementation of the waiver, for the one daymonth period Januaryended 11,June 2024,30, the2026 Fundwere accrued the Sponsor fee of 0.29% ($21).$205,215. In the future, if the Sponsor decides to waive all or a portion of the Sponsor’s Fee,fee, Shareholders will be notified in a prospectus supplement, in the Fund’s periodic reports and/or on the Fund’sSponsor’s website for the Fund. Fees accrued for the quarter ended December 31, 2025 were $278,172.
see in full comparison
Reworded

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

The Sponsor’s fee is accrued daily at an annualized rate equal to 0.19% (i.e., 0.19%/365 days) of the net asset value of the Fund and is payable at least quarterly in arrears in U.S. dollars. The Sponsor may, at its sole discretion and from time to time, waive all or a portion of the Sponsor’s fee for stated periods of time. The Sponsor is under no obligation to waive any portion of its fees and any such waiver shall create no obligation to waive any such fees during any period not covered by the waiver. There are no specific circumstances under which the Sponsor has determined to waive its fees. If the Sponsor decides to waive all or a portion of the Sponsor's Fee, Shareholders will be notified of any such waiver in a prospectus supplement, in the Fund's periodic reports and/or on the Fund's website. The Fund will sell bitcoin as needed to pay the Sponsor’s fee. From January 12, 2024 to August 2, 2024, the Sponsor waived a portion of the Sponsor’s Fee so that the Sponsor’s Fee after the fee waiver would be equal to 0.00% of the net asset value of the Fund for the first $10.0 billion of the Fund’s assets. In the future, if the Sponsor decides to waive all or a portion of the Sponsor’s Fee, Shareholders will be notified in a prospectus supplement, in the Fund’s periodic reports and/or on the Sponsor’s website for the Fund. Fees accrued for the quarter ended DecemberJune 31,30, 20252026 were $278,172.$205,215.
see in full comparison
Reworded

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Net realized and change in unrealized loss on investment in bitcoin for the three months ended DecemberJune 31,30, 2025,2026, was approximately $156,834,907$46,386,753 which includes a realized gainloss of $161,331$8,622 on the sale of bitcoin to pay the SponsorSponsor’s Fee,fee, net realized gainloss on investment in bitcoin sold for redemptions of $6,304,550$388,235 and net change in unrealized depreciation on investment in bitcoin of approximately $163,300,788.$45,989,896. Net realized and change in unrealized loss on investment in bitcoin for the period was driven by bitcoin price depreciation from $114,223.01$68,129.64 per unit as of SeptemberMarch 30,31, 20252026 to $87,463.03$59,101.49 per unit as of DecemberJune 31,30, 2025.2026. Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations was approximately $157,113,079$46,591,968 for the three months ended DecemberJune 31,30, 2025,2026, which consisted of the net realized and change in unrealized loss on investment in bitcoin of $156,834,907,$46,386,753, and the Sponsor Fee of $278,172.$205,215. Net assets decreased to approximately $500,874,538$334,694,929 onas Decemberof 31,June 2025.30, 2026. The decrease in net assets primarily resulted from net capital Share transactions of approximately $(48,053,202), as well as the aforementioned bitcoin price depreciation and net capital share transactions of approximately $3,062,848.depreciation.
see in full comparison
Removed text
“Results of Operations for the nine months ended December 31, 2024 For the nine months ended December 31, 2024, 7,350,000 Shares were issued in exchange for 4,262.4171 bitcoins and 2,550,000 Shares were redeemed in exchange for 1,478.794 bitcoins. The Fund’s NAV per Share began the period at $40.95 and ended the period at $54.11. The 32.14% increase in the Fund's NAV from $40.95 at March 31, 2024 to $54.11 at December 31, 2024 is directly related to the 32.25% increase in the price of bitcoin. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (28)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

The Franklin Templeton Digital Holdings Trust (the “Trust”) was formed as a Delaware statutory trust on September 6, 2023, and is governed by the provisions of an Agreement and Declaration of Trust dated as of January 5, 2024. The Trust is not registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”) and is not a commodity pool for purposes of the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”). The Trust currently offers a single series, the Franklin Bitcoin ETF (the “Fund”), which is the sole series of the Trust. The Sponsor of the Trust and the Fund (the “Sponsor”) is Franklin Holdings, LLC. The Sponsor is not subject to regulation by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) as a commodity pool operator with respect to the Fund, or a commodity trading advisor with respect to the Fund. The Fund issues sharesShares (the “Shares”), which represent units of fractional undivided beneficial interest in and ownership of the Fund. The Shares of the Fund are listed on the Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (“Cboe BZX Exchange” or the “Exchange”).

Reworded

The Fund seeks to reflect generally the performance of the price of bitcoin before payment of the Fund's expenses and liabilities.expenses. The Shares are intended to offer a convenient means of making an investment similar to an investment in bitcoin relative to acquiring, holding and trading bitcoin directly on a peer-to-peer or other basis or via a digital asset platform. The Shares have been designed to remove obstacles associated with the complexities and operational burdens involved in a direct investment in bitcoin by providing an investment with a value that reflects the price of the bitcoin owned by the Fund at such time, less the Fund's expenses and liabilities.expenses. The Fund is not a proxy for a direct investment in bitcoin. Rather, the Shares are intended to provide a cost-effective alternative means of obtaining investment exposure through the securities markets that is similar to an investment in bitcoin. The Fund is a passive investment vehicle and is not a leveraged product. The Sponsor does not actively manage the bitcoin held by the Fund. Except when aggregated in Creation Units, the Shares are not redeemable securities.

Reworded

The Fund issues and redeemsoffers Shares only to eligible financial institutions called Authorized Participants and only in one or more blocks of 50,000 Shares (“Creation Units”). Creation Units are redeemable only by Authorized Participants. Individual Shares will not be redeemed by the Fund. As ofDuring the period covered by this report, Creation Units arewere issued and redeemed in exchange for cash.cash; however, the Fund has the ability to conduct creation and redemption transactions in-kind for bitcoin. The Shares are listed and traded on the Exchange under the ticker symbol “EZBC”. The market price of the Shares may be different than the Fund’s NAV per Share. The Fund issues and redeems Shares in Creation Units on a continuous basis at the applicable NAV per Share on the transaction order date.

Reworded

The Fund’s only ordinary recurring expense is expected to be the Sponsor’s fee. In exchange for the Sponsor’s fee, the Sponsor has agreed to assume the ordinary fees and expenses incurred by the Fund, including but not limited to the following: the fees charged by the Administrator, the Marketing Agent, the Custodians and the Trustee, Cboe BZX Exchange listing fees, typical maintenance and transaction fees of the DTC, SEC registration fees, printing and mailing costs, tax reporting fees, audit fees, license fees and expenses, and up to $500,000 per annum in ordinary legal fees and expenses. The Sponsor paid the costs of the Fund’s organization and the initial offering costs, and may not seek reimbursement of such costs.

Reworded

The Sponsor’s fee is accrued daily at an annualized rate equal to 0.19% (i.e., 0.19%/365 days) of the net asset value of the Fund and is payable at least quarterly in arrears in U.S. dollars. The Sponsor may, at its sole discretion and from time to time, waive all or a portion of the Sponsor’s fee for stated periods of time. The Sponsor is under no obligation to waive any portion of its fees and any such waiver shall create no obligation to waive any such fees during any period not covered by the waiver. There are no specific circumstances under which the Sponsor has determined to waive its fees. If the Sponsor decides to waive all or a portion of the Sponsor’s Fee, Shareholders will be notified of any such waiver in a prospectus supplement, in the Fund’s periodic reports and/or on the Fund’s website. The Fund will sell bitcoin as needed to pay the Sponsor’s fee. The Fund bears transaction costs, including any bitcoin network fees or other similar transaction fees, in connection with any sales of bitcoin necessary to pay the Sponsor’s fee, as well as other Fund expenses (if any) that are not assumed by the Sponsor (expenses assumed by the Sponsor are specified above). Any bitcoin network fees and similar transaction fees incurred in connection with the creation or redemption of Creation Units are borne by the Authorized Participant. For a period from January 12, 2024 to August 2, 2024, the Sponsor waived a portion of theThe Sponsor’s Fee so that the Sponsor’s Fee after the fee waiver would be equal to 0.00% of the net asset value of the Fundaccrued for the firstthree $10.0 billion of the Fund’s assets. Prior to the implementation of the waiver, for the one daymonth period Januaryended 11,June 2024,30, the2026 Fundwere accrued the Sponsor fee of 0.29% ($21).$205,215. In the future, if the Sponsor decides to waive all or a portion of the Sponsor’s Fee,fee, Shareholders will be notified in a prospectus supplement, in the Fund’s periodic reports and/or on the Fund’sSponsor’s website for the Fund. Fees accrued for the quarter ended December 31, 2025 were $278,172.

Reworded

The FundTrust is an “emerging growth company” as that term is used in the SecuritiesJumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 1933, as amended (the “SecuritiesJOBS Act”), and, as such, the Fund may electsubject to comply with certain reduced public company reporting requirements.requirements under U.S. federal securities laws.

Reworded

The Administrator will rely on the Index as the index price to be used when determining NAV. However, determining the value of the Trust’s bitcoin using the Index is not in accordance with GAAP, and therefore is not used in the Trust’s financial statements. The Trust’s bitcoins are carried, for financial statement purposes, at fair value, as required by GAAP. The Trust determines the fair value of bitcoin based on the price provided by the bitcoin market that the Trust considers its “principal market” as of 11:59:59 PM, ET on the valuation date.date (the “Principal Market Price”). The net asset value of the Trust determined on a GAAP basis is referred to as the “Principal Market NAV” and the net asset value of the Trust per Share determined on a GAAP basis is referred to as the “Principal Market NAV per Share”.

Removed

The Sponsor identifies and determines the Fund’s principal market (or in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market) for bitcoin consistent with the application of fair value measurement framework in FASB ASC 820-10. The principal market is the market where the reporting entity would normally enter into a transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability. The principal market must be available to and be accessible to the reporting entity. The reporting entity is the Trust, on behalf of the Fund.

Reworded

NAV and NAV per Share are not measures calculated in accordance with GAAP and are not intended as a substitute for Principal Market NAV and Principal Market NAV per Share, respectively.

Reworded

The Trust’s and the Fund’s financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements relies on estimates and assumptions that impact the Fund’s as well as the Trust’s financial position and results of operations. These estimates and assumptions affect the Fund’s as well as the Trust’s application of accounting policies. A description of the valuation of bitcoin, a critical accounting policy that is important to understanding the results of operations and financial position of the Trust and the Fund is presented in the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K in the section entitled “Calculation of Net Asset Value, Valuation of Bitcoin and The CF BenchmarkBenchmarks Index.Index”. In addition, please refer to Note 2 to the financial statements included in this report for further discussion of the Trust’s and the Fund’s accounting policies.

Reworded

DiscussionResults of Operations

Reworded

At DecemberJune 31,30, 2025,2026, the Custodian held 5,727.65295,664.0163 bitcoins on behalf of the Fund, with a market value of $500,957,877$334,751,802 (cost: $426,448,438$424,710,391) based on the Principal Market Price at period end.

Added

Results of Operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2026

Reworded

Results of Operations for the quarter ended December 31, 2025 For the three months ended DecemberJune 31,30, 2025,2026, 500,000150,000 Shares were issued in exchange for 289.303386.6972 bitcoins and 600,0001,250,000 Shares were redeemed in exchange for 347.1368722.4968 bitcoins. The Fund’s NAV per Share began the quarter at $66.11$39.39 and ended the quarter at $50.59.$34.15. The 23.48%13.30% decrease in the Fund’s NAV from $66.11$39.39 at SeptemberMarch 31, 2026 to $34.15 at June 30, 2025 to $50.59 at December 31, 20252026 is directly related to the 23.43%13.25% decrease in the price of bitcoin. The Fund’s NAV decreased slightly more than the price of bitcoin on a percentage basis due to the Sponsor’s fee of $278,172$205,215 for the quarter.

Reworded

Net realized and change in unrealized loss on investment in bitcoin for the three months ended DecemberJune 31,30, 2025,2026, was approximately $156,834,907$46,386,753 which includes a realized gainloss of $161,331$8,622 on the sale of bitcoin to pay the SponsorSponsor’s Fee,fee, net realized gainloss on investment in bitcoin sold for redemptions of $6,304,550$388,235 and net change in unrealized depreciation on investment in bitcoin of approximately $163,300,788.$45,989,896. Net realized and change in unrealized loss on investment in bitcoin for the period was driven by bitcoin price depreciation from $114,223.01$68,129.64 per unit as of SeptemberMarch 30,31, 20252026 to $87,463.03$59,101.49 per unit as of DecemberJune 31,30, 2025.2026. Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations was approximately $157,113,079$46,591,968 for the three months ended DecemberJune 31,30, 2025,2026, which consisted of the net realized and change in unrealized loss on investment in bitcoin of $156,834,907,$46,386,753, and the Sponsor Fee of $278,172.$205,215. Net assets decreased to approximately $500,874,538$334,694,929 onas Decemberof 31,June 2025.30, 2026. The decrease in net assets primarily resulted from net capital Share transactions of approximately $(48,053,202), as well as the aforementioned bitcoin price depreciation and net capital share transactions of approximately $3,062,848.depreciation.

Added

Results of Operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2025

Added

At June 30, 2025, the Custodian held 5,155.3659 bitcoins on behalf of the Fund, with a market value of $559,666,521 (cost: $342,972,348) based on the Principal Market Price at period end.

Removed

Results of Operations for the quarter ended December 31, 2024 For the three months ended December 31, 2024, 1,500,000 Shares were issued in exchange for 869.5836 bitcoins and 600,000 Shares were redeemed in exchange for 347.8288 bitcoins. The Fund’s NAV per Share began the period at $36.92 and ended the period at $54.11. The 46.56% increase in the Fund's NAV from $36.92 at September 30, 2024 to $54.11 at December 31, 2024 is directly related to the 46.62% increase in the price of bitcoin. The Fund's NAV increased slightly less than the price of bitcoin on a percentage basis due to the Sponsor's fee, which was $295,795 for the quarter.

Removed

Net realized and unrealized gain on investment in bitcoin for the three months ended December 31, 2024, was approximately $214,180,379 which includes a realized gain of $927 on the sale of bitcoin to pay the Sponsor Fee, net realized gain on investment in bitcoin sold for redemptions of $2,813,792 and net change in unrealized appreciation on investment in bitcoin of approximately $211,365,660. Net realized and unrealized gain on investment in bitcoin for the period was driven by bitcoin price appreciation from $63,677.63 per unit as of September 30, 2024 to $93,365.36 per unit as of December 31, 2024. Net increase in net assets resulting from operations was approximately $213,884,584 for the three months ended December 31, 2024, which consisted of the net realized and unrealized gain on investment in bitcoin of $214,180,379, offset by the Sponsor Fee of $(295,795). Net assets increased to approximately $711,570,074 on December 31, 2024. The increase in net assets primarily resulted from the aforementioned bitcoin price appreciation and net capital share transactions of approximately of $45,394,849.

Reworded

Results of Operations for the nine months ended December 31, 2025 For the nine monthsquarter ended DecemberJune 31,30, 2025, 2,950,0001,050,000 Shares were issued in exchange for 1,707.8385608.1510 bitcoinsof bitcoin and 1,600,000700,000 Shares were redeemed in exchange for 926.2185405.4311 bitcoins.of bitcoin. The Fund’s NAV per Share began the period at $48.05 and ended the period at $50.59.$62.86. The 5.29%30.82% increase in the Fund’s NAV from $48.05 at March 31, 2025 to $50.59$62.86 at DecemberJune 31,30, 2025 is directly related to the 5.43%30.86% increase in the price of bitcoin. The Fund’s NAV increased slightly less than the price of bitcoin on a percentage basis due to the Sponsor’s fee of $812,154$237,309 for the period.

Reworded

Net realized and change in unrealized gain on investment in bitcoin for the ninethree months ended DecemberJune 31,30, 2025,2025 was approximately $110,238$128,538,118, which includes a realized gain of $318,730$63,640 on the sale of bitcoin to pay the Sponsor Fee, net realized gain on investment in bitcoin sold for redemptions of $22,457,335$8,955,571 and net change in unrealized depreciationappreciation on investment in bitcoin of approximately $22,665,827.$119,518,907. Net realized and change in unrealized gain on investment in bitcoin for the period was driven by bitcoin price appreciation from $82,956.00 per unit as of March 31, 2025 to $87,463.03$108,560.00 per unit as of DecemberJune 31,30, 2025. Net decreaseincrease in net assets resulting from operations was approximately $701,916$128,300,809 for the ninethree months ended DecemberJune 31,30, 2025, which consisted of the net realized and change in unrealized gain on investment in bitcoin of $110,238,$128,538,118, offset by the Sponsor Fee of $812,154.$237,309. Net assets increased to approximately $500,874,538$559,429,215 on DecemberJune 31,30, 2025. The increase in net assets primarily resulted from the aforementioned bitcoin price appreciation and net capital share transactions of approximately of $90,719,111.$20,271,063.

Removed

Results of Operations for the nine months ended December 31, 2024 For the nine months ended December 31, 2024, 7,350,000 Shares were issued in exchange for 4,262.4171 bitcoins and 2,550,000 Shares were redeemed in exchange for 1,478.794 bitcoins. The Fund’s NAV per Share began the period at $40.95 and ended the period at $54.11. The 32.14% increase in the Fund's NAV from $40.95 at March 31, 2024 to $54.11 at December 31, 2024 is directly related to the 32.25% increase in the price of bitcoin. The Fund's NAV increased slightly less than the price of bitcoin on a percentage basis due to the net Sponsor's fee post waiver, which was $419,080 for the period.

Removed

Net realized and unrealized gain on investment in bitcoin for the nine months ended December 31, 2024, was approximately $180,685,417 which includes a realized loss of $1,920 on the sale of bitcoin to pay the Sponsor Fee, net realized gain on investment in bitcoin sold for redemption of $1,659,645 and net change in unrealized appreciation on investment in bitcoin of approximately $179,027,692. Net realized and unrealized gain on investment in bitcoin for the period was driven by bitcoin price appreciation from $70,596.99 per unit as of March 31, 2024 to $93,365.36 per unit as of December 31, 2024. Net increase in net assets resulting from operations was approximately $180,266,337 for the nine months ended December 31, 2024, which consisted of the net realized and unrealized gain on investment in bitcoin of $180,685,417, offset by the net Sponsor's fee post waiver of $419,080. Net assets increased to approximately $711,570,074 on December 31, 2024. The increase in net assets primarily resulted from the aforementioned bitcoin price appreciation and net capital share transactions of approximately $189,402,632.

Reworded

The Fund is not aware of any trends, demands, commitments, events, or uncertainties that are reasonably likely to result in material changes to its liquidity needs. The Fund’s only ordinary recurring expense is expected to be the Sponsor’s fee. In exchange for the Sponsor’s fee, the Sponsor has agreed to assume the ordinary fees and expenses incurred by the Fund, including but not limited to the following: the fees charged by the Administrator, the Marketing Agent, the Custodians and the Trustee, Cboe BZX Exchange listing fees, typical maintenance and transaction fees of the DTC, SEC registration fees, printing and mailing costs, tax reporting fees, audit fees, license fees and expenses, and up to $500,000 per annum in ordinary legal fees and expenses. The Sponsor will also paypaid the costs of the Fund’s organization and the initial offering costs, and may not seek reimbursement of such costs. The Sponsor is not required to pay any extraordinary or non-routine expenses.

Reworded

The Sponsor’s fee is accrued daily at an annualized rate equal to 0.19% (i.e., 0.19%/365 days) of the net asset value of the Fund and is payable at least quarterly in arrears in U.S. dollars. The Sponsor may, at its sole discretion and from time to time, waive all or a portion of the Sponsor’s fee for stated periods of time. The Sponsor is under no obligation to waive any portion of its fees and any such waiver shall create no obligation to waive any such fees during any period not covered by the waiver. There are no specific circumstances under which the Sponsor has determined to waive its fees. If the Sponsor decides to waive all or a portion of the Sponsor's Fee, Shareholders will be notified of any such waiver in a prospectus supplement, in the Fund's periodic reports and/or on the Fund's website. The Fund will sell bitcoin as needed to pay the Sponsor’s fee. From January 12, 2024 to August 2, 2024, the Sponsor waived a portion of the Sponsor’s Fee so that the Sponsor’s Fee after the fee waiver would be equal to 0.00% of the net asset value of the Fund for the first $10.0 billion of the Fund’s assets. In the future, if the Sponsor decides to waive all or a portion of the Sponsor’s Fee, Shareholders will be notified in a prospectus supplement, in the Fund’s periodic reports and/or on the Sponsor’s website for the Fund. Fees accrued for the quarter ended DecemberJune 31,30, 20252026 were $278,172.$205,215.

Reworded

The Fund will sell bitcoin on an as-needed basis to pay the Sponsor’s fee. The Fund bears transaction costs, including any bitcoin network fees or other similar transaction fees, in connection with any sales of bitcoin necessary to pay the Sponsor’s fee, as well as other Fund expenses (if any) that are not assumed by the Sponsor (expenses assumed by the Sponsor are specified above). Any bitcoin network fees and similar transaction fees incurred in connection with the creation or redemption of Creation Units are borne by the Authorized Participant.

Reworded

AtAs Decemberof 31,June 202530, 2026 and March 31, 2025,2026, neither the Fund as well asnor the Trust did not havehad any off-balance sheet arrangements Historical Bitcoin Pricesarrangements.

Reworded

The following chart shows movements in the price of bitcoin based on the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate – New York Variant for the Bitcoin – U.S. Dollar trading pair (the “CF Benchmarks Index”) in U.S. dollars per unit over the period from OctoberApril 1, 20252026 to DecemberJune 31,30, 2025.2026.

EZBC insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

No Form 4 stock transactions in this period.

Well-known investors holding EZBC (13F)

None of the 59 investors we track reported a position in their latest 13F.

Coming soon: email alerts when EZBC files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.