FBP 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
First Bancorp · NYSE · State Commercial Banks · CIK 1057706 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “The Corporation is subject to stringent and changing privacy laws, regulations, and standards as well as policies, contracts, and privacy security.”
New heading “privacy legal obligations, could have a material adverse effect on our business.”
New heading “face noncompliance anti-money laundering statutes and regulations.”
Removed heading “credit quality and the value of the portfolio of Puerto”
Removed heading “The Corporation’s force-placed insurance policies could be disputed by the customer.”
Removed heading “The Corporation is subject to stringent and changing privacy laws, regulations, and standards as well as policies, contracts, and security.”
Largest changes
“Fair regulations impose nondiscriminatory lending requirements on financial institutions. The U.S. Department of Justice and other enforcing A successful challenge institution's performance under the Community Reinvestment Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act or any of the other fair lending and regulations could result in a wide variety of sanctions, including damages and civil money penalties, injunctive relief, restrictions on mergers and acquisitions activity, restrictions on expansion and restrictions on entering new business lines. …”see in full comparison
“focused on privacy matters. Any by us or our partners rules, investigations entities, litigation, fines, penalties outcomes expose liabilities, and harm our reputation, and have a material adverse effect on our business. While we aim to comply with applicable data protection respects, violated such obligations, will to successfully defend against such claims, or will not be significant fines penalties non-compliance.”see in full comparison
“partners investigations governmental entities, private claims and litigation, fines, penalties or other liabilities.”see in full comparison
see in full comparisoncyber-attacks,Cybercomputerincidents,viruses,malwaremalicious or destructive code,infections, phishing attacks,denial of servicedenial-of-service attacks, ransomware, or other securitybreach tactics thatbreaches, could result in unauthorizedrelease,accessgathering,tomonitoring,or loss, misuse,loss,ordestruction, theft confidential, proprietary, information, including intellectual property,destruction ofours, our employees, our customers, or third parties,sensitive damages to systems, disruption of operations, orotherwiseimpairmentdisruptionofcustomers’customerparties’accessdomesticallytointernationally.our services.
“The Corporation is subject to stringent and changing privacy laws, regulations, and standards as well as policies, contracts, and privacy security.”see in full comparison
“The Corporation is subject to stringent and changing privacy laws, regulations, and standards as well as policies, contracts, and security.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (311)
Below is a discussion about material risks and uncertainties that andcould financialimpact condition, including by causing actualbusinesses, results toof differ materially from those projected in anyoperations, forward-looking statements. OtherAdditional risks and uncertainties, including thoseuncertainties not currently known to the Corporation or itsdeemed managementimmaterial andmay itsalso managementmaterially deemsadversely immaterial,affect futurethe periods.Corporation. Thus, the following should not be considered a complete discussion of all of the risks and uncertainties the Corporation may face. See the discussion under “Forward-Looking Statements,” in this Form 10-K.
THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT AND OUR INDUSTRY level,inflation liabilities, and corresponding effects income, net interest margin, originations, deposit attrition, overall results of operations, and liquidity position.
interest-bearing liabilities.
Because assets and liabilities may reprice at different times and by different amounts, changes in interest rates can materially affect net interest income and net interest margin. Prolonged periods of lower interest rates generally compress margin and reduce profitability.
Higher interest rates can increase borrowing costs for consumers and businesses, reduce loan demand, shift customer behavior deposit products, can negatively deposit retention, funding costs, Competitive pressures to attract deposits may increase reliance on higher-cost funding, including wholesale funding, compress interest margin.
influenced control, conditions, inflationary trends, changes in government spending and debt issuances and monetary policy actions of governmental regulatory agencies, including the Federal Reserve Board.
arises maturities, indices them, times magnitudes.
example, the interest expense for liability instruments might not change by the same amount as interest income received from loans investments.
income is the difference between the amounts received by us interest-earning assets interest paid by us on our interest-bearing liabilities. Differences in the repricing structure of our assets and liabilities may result in changes in our profits when interest rates change. For instance, lower interest rates for prolonged periods tend to compress the net interest margin and reduce profitability.
Conversely, consumers reduce demand for such loans, which may negatively impact our profits by reducing the amount of interest income due to declines volume.
This happens is greater the reduction
Competitive pressures often reliance wholesale funding, squeezing margin, even though sensitive many inflationary trends, spending issuances regulatory agencies, in particular, the Federal Reserve Board.
basis risk is the risk of adverse consequences resulting from unequal changes in the difference, also referred to “spread” or basis, between the rates for two or more instruments with maturity and occurs when market rates different financial instruments or the indices price assets and liabilities change at different times or by different amounts. For example, the interest expense for liability instruments might not change by the same amount as interest income received from loans investments.
attract retain clients, acceptance prospective
This, turn, affects originations, assets, and the extent of any re-shifting between non-interest-bearing and interest-bearing liabilities.
Net interest income may be affected by prepayments on MBS. Generally, when rates rise, prepayments of principal and interest will decrease, and the duration securities will increase and vice versa.
rise, decrease, duration increase.
Conversely, when rates fall, prepayments of principal interest will increase, the duration of MBS will decrease.
Such acceleration of MBSprepayments lower yields premiums accelerate.
Conversely, acceleration in the prepayments of MBS would increase yields on securities purchased at a discount, as the accretion accelerate.
might callable because decreases in interest rates might prompt the early redemption of such securities.
volatility in, runoffs, constraints, and increased regulatory requirements and costs.
March
May developmentsresulted heightened volatility consequently negatively impacted confidence soundness institutions.
developments resulted in certain regional banks experiencing higher than normal deposit outflows and an elevated level of competition for deposits in the market. The impact of market volatility from adverse developments in the banking industry such as this one are highly uncertain and difficult to predict. In the aftermath of these bank failures, the banking agencies have increased regulatory requirements and costs that may impact capital ratios or the FDIC deposit insurance premium.
For example, in 2023, the FDIC issued a final rule to impose losses to (“DIF”) the closures Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank. The estimated losses will be recovered through quarterly special assessments collected from began total estimated assessment amounted to $6.3 million, of which $5.5 million has been paid.
monitor the estimated loss
aftermath failures, premium.
assessment to recover certain estimated losses to the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) arising from the closures of Silicon Valley Signature recovered assessments collection began the quarter ended June $1.1 $6.3 income as “FDIC deposit insurance” expenses. As $7.4 paid.
monitor the FDIC’s estimated loss to the DIF, which could affect the amount of its accrued liability.
Difficult market and general economic conditions have affected the financial industry in the past and could adversely affect in the future.
deterioration write-downs including U.S. government-sponsored entities (“GSEs”) as well as major commercial banks and investment banks.
CECL, difficult, subjective, and complex judgments, including forecasts of economic conditions and how these economic predictions might impair the borrowers repay loans, which no longer accurately estimated may, turn, impact the reliability of the models.
GSEs agreements) favorable terms, all, disruptions markets deteriorating expectations.
Unfavorable or uncertain economic and market growth,declines confidence; availability or increases in the cost and capital; increases in inflation or interest rates; high unemployment; natural disasters; epidemics and pandemics; or a combination of these or other factors.
impacted home historically cyclical, enjoying periods of strong growth and profitability followed by periods of shrinking volumes and industry-wide losses. During periods of rising interest rates, the series of interest rate increases occurred, the refinancing of many tends to decrease as the economic incentives for borrowers to refinance their existing mortgage loans are reduced.
face substantial competition competitors, automobile leasing brokerage firms unions, retailers, fintech digital platforms.
compete relative degree appeal meets clients’ expectations.
compete relative appeal meets clients’ compete also depends on its ability to attract and retain professional and other personnel, and on its reputation.
originate loans primarily on the rates and fees charged and the service it provides to its borrowers in making prompt credit decisions. There can be assurance that future the Corporation will to increase its deposit base, originate loans in the manner or on the terms which it has done so in the past, or otherwise compete effectively.
credit quality and the value of the portfolio of Puerto
The Corporation’s credit quality and the value of the portfolio of Puerto Rico government securities hashave been, and in the future be, taken government or the PROMESA oversight board to address the ongoing fiscal and economic challenges in Puerto Rico.
concentrated faced prolonged challenges.
(“PRPB”) preliminary gross national product (“GNP”) grew 0.4% in fiscal year 2025, marking the fifth consecutive year of positive economic growth, economic prospects remain uncertain. However, according to the PROMESA oversight board, the fiscal year 2026 budget prepares the Puerto Rico government for potential further declines in federal funding over the fiscal year that began on July 1, 2025.
A significant portion of our business activities and credit exposure is concentrated in Puerto Rico, which has faced prolonged challenges decades.
economy showed consumption prospects uncertain.
Board (“PRPB”) projected a real gross national product (“GNP”) growth of 0.7% for fiscal year 2023, the third consecutive year with a positive year-over-year variance.
In addition, the
2024 Fiscal Plan for Puerto Rico (the “2024 Fiscal
Plan”) certified by the PROMESA oversight board, projects the GNP 1.0% followed 0.8% 0.1% reflecting the temporary nature of federal stimulus inflows and structural challenges in the local economy.
reforms outlined
Plan, infrastructure investment, reforms, energy modernization, aim to sustainable growth. However, delays in implementing these reforms or inefficiencies in their execution could negatively impact the local economy and, by extension, our business.
while federal disaster relief
COVID-19 aid activity, finite, gradual depletion expose economic weaknesses.
the Corporation had $288.6$297.8 million of direct exposure to the Puerto Rico government, its municipalities and public corporations. As of December 31, 2024,2025, approximately $195.8$211.3 million of the exposure consisted of loans and obligations of municipalities in Puerto Rico that are supported by assigned property tax revenues and for which, in most cases, the good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable municipality have been pledged to their repayment, and $51.1$42.2 million consisted of loans and obligations which are supported by one or more specific sources of municipal revenues. The municipalities are required by law to levy bonds notes. In addition to municipalities, the total direct exposure also included $8.8$8.7 a loan extended to an affiliate of PREPA, $30.0 corporations$32.9 MBS issued the PR Authority (“PRHFA”), $2.9$2.7 million as part of its available-for-sale debt securities portfolio (fair value of $1.6 million as of December 31, 20242025).
funded conduit structures support the federal programs of Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (“LIHTC”) combined with Community Development Block Grant- Disaster Recovery (“CDBG-DR”) funding amounted to $59.2$92.4 million. The main objective of these programs is to spur development in new or rehabilitated and affordable rental housing. PRHFA, as program subrecipient and conduct issuer, issues tax-exempt co-underwrite mirror agreement for the specific project loan to which the Corporation will serve as ultimate lenderlender, but where the PRHFA will be the lender record.
The Corporation operates in various jurisdictions highly dependent on federal funding programs. On January 27, 2025, the Office Budget (“OMB”) Memorandum M-25-13 “Temporary Pause Grant, Loan, Financial Assistance Programs.” The Memo directed every federal agency to “temporarily pause all activities related to obligation disbursement assistance, agency implicated orders, including, but not limited to, financial assistance for foreign aid, nongovernmental organizations, DEI, woke gender ideology, green deal.”
Lawsuits challenging pause immediately filed
Trump implementing
Trump
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
Not available: the latest 10-K lists Item 7 but has no text under it (smaller reporting companies may omit this item). See the original filing. Open the filing on SEC.gov.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
The Corporation’s business, operating results and/or the market price of our common stock may be significantly affected by a number of
factors. A detailed
discussion of certain
risk factors that
could affect
the Corporation’s future
operations, financial
condition or results
future periods is set forth in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in the 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K. These risk factors, and others, could
cause actual
results to
differ materially
from historical
results or
the results
contemplated by
the forward-looking statements
contained in
this report. Also,
refer to the
discussion in
“Forward-Looking Statements” and
Part I, Item
2, “Management’s
Discussion and
Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results
of Operations,” in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for
additional information that may supplement
update the discussion of risk factors in the
2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
There have been no material changes from those risk factors previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A., “Risk Factors,” in the 2025 Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
No wording changes found in this section.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
No wording changes found in this section.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)
FBP insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 4 filings (3 insiders, 4 trade dates, 54,350 shares, about $1.5M). Net open-market shares: -54,350 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$1.5M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-30 | Heffern John A. |
Shares withheld for tax | 71 | $26.34 | $1.9K |
| 2026-09-30 | Heffern John A. |
Grant/award | 1,518 | $26.34 | $40.0K |
| 2026-09-30 | Luz Crespo |
Shares withheld for tax | 182 | $26.34 | $4.8K |
| 2026-09-30 | Luz Crespo |
Grant/award | 1,518 | $26.34 | $40.0K |
| 2026-09-30 | Dedrick Tracey A |
Shares withheld for tax | 19 | $26.34 | $500 |
| 2026-09-30 | Dedrick Tracey A |
Grant/award | 1,518 | $26.34 | $40.0K |
| 2026-09-30 | Herencia Roberto R |
Grant/award | 3,796 | $26.34 | $100.0K |
| 2026-09-30 | Acosta Reboyras Juan |
Shares withheld for tax | 182 | $26.34 | $4.8K |
| 2026-09-30 | Acosta Reboyras Juan |
Grant/award | 1,518 | $26.34 | $40.0K |
| 2026-09-30 | Frye Daniel Edward |
Grant/award | 1,518 | $26.34 | $40.0K |
| 2026-09-02 | Herencia Roberto R |
Open-market sale | 26,350 | $28.48 | $750.4K |
| 2026-08-26 | Rivera Nayda |
Open-market sale | 10,000 | $28.19 | $281.9K |
| 2026-08-17 | Rivera Nayda |
Open-market sale | 10,000 | $29.59 | $295.9K |
| 2026-06-30 | Berges Gonzalez Orlando |
Shares withheld for tax | 4,760 | $26.07 | $124.1K |
| 2026-06-30 | Berges Gonzalez Orlando |
Shares withheld for tax | 2,518 | $26.07 | $65.6K |
| 2026-06-30 | Berges Gonzalez Orlando |
Shares withheld for tax | 4,523 | $26.07 | $117.9K |
| 2026-06-05 | Diaz-Bento Lilian |
Open-market sale | 8,000 | $24.33 | $194.6K |
| 2026-03-13 | Dedrick Tracey A |
Small acquisition | 251 | $19.91 | $5.0K |
Well-known investors holding FBP (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 1,351,558 | $35.2M | 0.03% | Added 25% |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 828,813 | $21.6M | 0.03% | Added 633% |
| D. E. Shaw & Co. | 2026-06-30 | 690,607 | $18.0M | 0.01% | Reduced 27% |
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 270,932 | $7.1M | 0.0% | Added 16% |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 202,502 | $5.3M | 0.01% | Reduced 39% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 126,655 | $3.3M | 0.0% | Added 75% |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 52,657 | $1.4M | 0.0% | Reduced 92% |