FHB 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
First Hawaiian, Inc. · Nasdaq · State Commercial Banks · CIK 36377 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Impairment of goodwill may adversely impact future results of operations.”
New heading “Climate-related physical and transition risks could have a material negative impact on us and our customers, and divergent and evolving laws and regulations and stakeholder expectations regarding climate-related matters may subject us to additional, different and potentially conflicting requirements and expectations and result in higher regulatory and compliance and other risks and costs.”
Removed heading “Fee revenues from overdraft protection programs constitute a portion of our noninterest income and may be subject to increased supervisory scrutiny.”
Removed heading “Climate change could have a material negative impact on us and our customers.”
Largest changes
U.S. global trade policies, including the imposition of tariffs and uncertainty surrounding the resolution of trade disputes, or renewal of trade agreements, with various countries, may cause inflation to rise and ultimately affect interest rates. In addition, federal budget deficit concerns and the potential for political conflict over legislation to fund U.S. government operations and raise the U.S. government’s debt limit may increase the possibility of a default by the U.S. government on its debt obligations, related credit-rating downgrades, or an economic recession in the United States. Many of our investment securities are issued by the U.S. government and government agencies and sponsored entities.see in full comparisonAsAaprolongedresultor repeated shutdown ofuncertainthedomestic political conditions, including potential futureU.S. federal governmentshutdowns,couldtheadverselypossibilityaffect our business, financial condition, liquidity, and results oftheoperations. A U.S. federal governmentdefaultingshutdown may also impair the financial capacity of borrowers who depend onitsfederalobligationssalaries,forcontracts,areimbursements,periodor benefit programs, including government employees, federal contractors, and recipients oftimegovernment-fundeddueservices. Reduced or delayed income todebttheseceilingborrowerslimitationscould increase delinquencies, reduce loan demand, negatively affect deposit inflows, and increase our credit risk exposure. In addition, disruptions to federal economic data releases orotherfiscalunresolvedoperationspoliticalmayissues,createinvestmentsvolatility in financialinstrumentsmarkets,issuedaffectingorinterestguaranteedrates,byliquidity conditions, and thefederalvaluationgovernmentofpose liquidity risks. In connection with prior political disputes over U.S. fiscal and budgetary issues leading to the U.S. government shutdownsecurities in2023,ourFitchinvestmentlowered its long term sovereign credit rating on the U.S. from AAA to AA+. A further downgrade, or downgrades by other rating agencies, as well as sovereign debt issues facing the governments of other countries, could have a material adverse impact on financial markets and economic conditions in the U.S. and worldwide.portfolio.
“The Company’s policy is to assess goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis or between annual assessments if a triggering event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Evaluations may be based on many factors, some of which are the price of our common stock, discounted cash flow projections and data from comparable market acquisitions. …”see in full comparison
In recent periods, there have been significant changes in inflationary conditions due to, among other factors, global supply chain disruptions, changes in the labor market and geopolitical tensions. Higher commodity prices, labor shortages and supply chain disruptions,see in full comparisonincludinghavethosealsoresulting from Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukrainecontributed, andthe conflictmay in theMiddlefutureEast, are also contributingcontribute, to inflationary pressures, which could, in turn, adversely affect the U.S. economy, the demand for our products and creditworthiness of our borrowers. Volatility and uncertainty related to inflation and the effects of inflation may enhance or contribute to some of the risks of ourbusiness.business,Higherincludingcostthroughcouldincreasingreduce our profit margins. Aggressive action by monetary authorities to combat inflation could lead to higher rates which couldcosts, negativelyaffectaffecting economicgrowth.growth or impacting asset values or customer defaults. Higherrates could make less creditworthy customers less able to meet their payment obligations. Higher rates could also lead to reduced valuations on long duration financial assets and real estate and impact the value of collateral pledged for loans. Finally, higherrates could result in deposit outflows or higher deposit costs. These inflationary pressures could adversely impact our business, financial position and results of operations.
“Downgrades in sovereign credit ratings by other rating agencies, as well as sovereign debt issues facing the governments of other countries, could have a material adverse impact on financial markets and economic conditions in the U.S. and worldwide. Unfavorable changes related to these national economic and political conditions may also result in increased delinquencies and defaults among borrowers in light of economic uncertainty, which could require us to charge off a higher percentage of loans and increase the provision for credit losses, ultimately reducing our net income.”see in full comparison
“Impairment of goodwill may adversely impact future results of operations.”see in full comparison
“Climate-related physical and transition risks could have a material negative impact on us and our customers, and divergent and evolving laws and regulations and stakeholder expectations regarding climate-related matters may subject us to additional, different and potentially conflicting requirements and expectations and result in higher regulatory and compliance and other risks and costs.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (31)
The U.S. military has a major presence in Hawaii and Guam and, as a result, is an important aspect of the economies in which we operate. The funding of the U.S. military occurs as part of the overall U.S. government budget and appropriation process which is driven by numerous factors, including geopolitical events, macroeconomic conditions and the ability of the U.S. government to enact legislation such as appropriations bills. Cuts to defense and other security spending could have an adverse impact on the economy in our markets. The recent change in U.S. presidential administration contributes to uncertainty concerning the future direction and spending of the U.S. government.
U.S. global trade policies, including the imposition of tariffs and uncertainty surrounding the resolution of trade disputes, or renewal of trade agreements, with various countries, may cause inflation to rise and ultimately affect interest rates. In addition, federal budget deficit concerns and the potential for political conflict over legislation to fund U.S. government operations and raise the U.S. government’s debt limit may increase the possibility of a default by the U.S. government on its debt obligations, related credit-rating downgrades, or an economic recession in the United States. Many of our investment securities are issued by the U.S. government and government agencies and sponsored entities. AsA aprolonged resultor repeated shutdown of uncertainthe domestic political conditions, including potential futureU.S. federal government shutdowns,could theadversely possibilityaffect our business, financial condition, liquidity, and results of theoperations. A U.S. federal government defaultingshutdown may also impair the financial capacity of borrowers who depend on itsfederal obligationssalaries, forcontracts, areimbursements, periodor benefit programs, including government employees, federal contractors, and recipients of timegovernment-funded dueservices. Reduced or delayed income to debtthese ceilingborrowers limitationscould increase delinquencies, reduce loan demand, negatively affect deposit inflows, and increase our credit risk exposure. In addition, disruptions to federal economic data releases or otherfiscal unresolvedoperations politicalmay issues,create investmentsvolatility in financial instrumentsmarkets, issuedaffecting orinterest guaranteedrates, byliquidity conditions, and the federalvaluation governmentof pose liquidity risks. In connection with prior political disputes over U.S. fiscal and budgetary issues leading to the U.S. government shutdownsecurities in 2023,our Fitchinvestment lowered its long term sovereign credit rating on the U.S. from AAA to AA+. A further downgrade, or downgrades by other rating agencies, as well as sovereign debt issues facing the governments of other countries, could have a material adverse impact on financial markets and economic conditions in the U.S. and worldwide.portfolio.
Downgrades in sovereign credit ratings by other rating agencies, as well as sovereign debt issues facing the governments of other countries, could have a material adverse impact on financial markets and economic conditions in the U.S. and worldwide. Unfavorable changes related to these national economic and political conditions may also result in increased delinquencies and defaults among borrowers in light of economic uncertainty, which could require us to charge off a higher percentage of loans and increase the provision for credit losses, ultimately reducing our net income.
Inflationary pressurepressures could pose a risk to the economy and the financial performance of the Bank.
In recent periods, there have been significant changes in inflationary conditions due to, among other factors, global supply chain disruptions, changes in the labor market and geopolitical tensions. Higher commodity prices, labor shortages and supply chain disruptions, includinghave thosealso resulting from Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukrainecontributed, and the conflictmay in the Middlefuture East, are also contributingcontribute, to inflationary pressures, which could, in turn, adversely affect the U.S. economy, the demand for our products and creditworthiness of our borrowers. Volatility and uncertainty related to inflation and the effects of inflation may enhance or contribute to some of the risks of our business.business, Higherincluding costthrough couldincreasing reduce our profit margins. Aggressive action by monetary authorities to combat inflation could lead to higher rates which couldcosts, negatively affectaffecting economic growth.growth or impacting asset values or customer defaults. Higher rates could make less creditworthy customers less able to meet their payment obligations. Higher rates could also lead to reduced valuations on long duration financial assets and real estate and impact the value of collateral pledged for loans. Finally, higher rates could result in deposit outflows or higher deposit costs. These inflationary pressures could adversely impact our business, financial position and results of operations.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, our commercial real estate loans represented approximately $4.5$4.6 billion or 31%32% of our total loan and lease portfolio. Commercial real estate loans may have a greater risk of loss than residential mortgage loans, in part because these loans are generally larger or more complex to underwrite and are characterized by having a limited supply of real estate at commercially attractive locations, long delivery time frames for development and high interest rate sensitivity. As payments on loans secured by commercial real estate often depend upon the successful operation and management of the properties and the businesses which operate from within them, repayment of such loans may be affected by factors outside the borrower’s control, such as adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy or changes in government regulation. In recent years, commercial real estate markets have been experiencing substantial growth, and increased competitive pressures have contributed significantly to historically low capitalization rates and rising property values. Commercial real estate markets have been particularly impacted by the economic disruption in recent years resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and a reduced demand for office space driven by the implications of hybrid work arrangements. Accordingly, federal banking regulatory agencies have expressed concerns about weaknesses in the current commercial real estate market. Our failure to adequately implement risk management policies, procedures and controls could adversely affect our ability to increase this portfolio going forward and could result in an increased rate of delinquencies in, and increased losses from, this portfolio.
Interest rates in the United States fellhave dramaticallybeen during the first quarter of 2020 and remained low through 2021, which adversely affected our net interest income. The Federal Reserve raised benchmark interest rates throughout 2022 and 2023 and held them at a high levelvolatile in 2024 until it decreased the benchmark rate by 50 basis points in September 2024, by 25 basis points in November 2024 and by 25 basis points in December 2024. The Federal Reserve may further raise or lower interest rates, or maintain them at elevated levels by recent historical standards, in response to economic conditions, particularly inflationary pressures and unemployment statistics.years. When interest rates rise, such as during 2022 and 2023, we can generally be expected to earn higher net interest income. However, higher interest rates can also lead to fewer originations of loans, less liquidity in the financial markets, and higher funding costs, each of which could adversely affect our revenues, liquidity and capital levels. Higher interest rates can also negatively affect the payment performance on loans that are linked to variable interest rates. If borrowers of variable rate loans are unable to afford higher interest payments, those borrowers may reduce or stop making payments, thereby causing us to incur losses and increased operational costs related to servicing a higher volume of delinquent loans. When interest rates decline, such as during the end of 2024, we have experienced, and could in the future experience, fixed-rate loan prepayments and higher investment portfolio cash flows, resulting in a lower yield on earning assets.
Impairment of goodwill may adversely impact future results of operations.
Accounting standards require that we account for certain acquisitions using a method that could result in goodwill. If the purchase price of the acquired company exceeds the fair value of the acquired net assets, the excess will be included in our consolidated balance sheet as goodwill. Goodwill was $995.5 million as of both December 31, 2025 and 2024. Our goodwill originated from the acquisition of the Company by BNPP in December of 2001. Goodwill generated in that acquisition was recorded on the balance sheet of the Bank as a result of push down accounting treatment, and remains on our consolidated balance sheets.
The Company’s policy is to assess goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis or between annual assessments if a triggering event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Evaluations may be based on many factors, some of which are the price of our common stock, discounted cash flow projections and data from comparable market acquisitions. A significant and sustained decline in our stock price and market capitalization, a significant decline in our expected future cash flows, a significant adverse change in the business climate or slower growth rates could result in impairment of our goodwill. Future evaluations of goodwill may result in the impairment and write-down of our goodwill balance which could have a material adverse impact on our earnings and adversely affect our operating results.
In order to manage the significant risks inherent in our business, we must maintain effective policies, procedures and systems that enable us to identify, monitor and control our exposure to material risks, such as credit, operational, legaloperational and reputationallegal risks. Our risk management methods may prove to be ineffective due to their design, their implementation or the degree to which we adhere to them, or as a result of the lack of adequate, accurate or timely information or otherwise. If our risk management efforts are ineffective, we could suffer losses that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, we could be subject to litigation, particularly from our customers, and sanctions or fines from regulators. Our techniques for managing the risks we face may not fully mitigate the risk exposure in all economic or market environments, including exposure to risks that we might fail to identify or anticipate.
Certain accounting policies are critical to presenting our financial condition and results of operations. They require management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments about matters that are uncertain. Materially different amounts could be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions or estimates. These critical accounting policies include the allowance for credit losses,losses and fair value measurements, pension and postretirement benefit obligations and income taxes.measurements. Because of the uncertainty of estimates involved in these matters, we may be required to do one or more of the following: significantly increase the allowance for credit losses or sustain credit losses that are significantly higher than the reserve provided; or reduce the carrying value of an asset measured at fair value; or significantly increase our accrued tax liability.value. Any of these could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies” for more information.
We operate in the highly competitive financial services industry and face significant competition for customers from financial institutions located both within and beyond our principal markets. We compete with commercial banks, savings banks, credit unions, non-bank financial services companiescompanies, andinsurance companies, other financial institutionsinstitutions, money market funds, hedge funds, and private equity and credit firms operating within or near the areas we serve. Additionally, certain large banks headquartered on the U.S. mainland and large community banking institutions target the same customers we do. Competition among providers of financial products and services continues to increase, with consumers and businesses having the opportunity to select from a growing variety of traditional and nontraditional alternatives, such as Private Credit/Direct lenders. In addition, as customer preferences and expectations continue to evolve, technology has lowered barriers to entry and made it possible for banks to expand their geographic reach by providing services over the Internet and for non-banks to offer products and services traditionally provided by banks, such as automatic transfer and automatic payment systems. The emergence, adoption and evolution of new technologies that do not require intermediation, including distributed ledgers such as digital assets and blockchain, as well as advances in automation, AI and robotics, could significantly affect the competition for financial services. The banking industry is experiencing rapid changes in technology, and, as a result, our future success will depend in part on our ability to address our customers’ needs by using technology. Customer loyalty can be influenced by a competitor’s new products, especially offerings that could provide cost savings or a higher return to the customer. We continue to face increased competitive pressures on loan rates and terms for high-quality credits. We may not be able to compete successfully with other financialfirms institutionscompeting in our markets, and we may have to pay higher interest rates to attract deposits, accept lower yields to attract loans and/or pay higher wages for new employees, which may result in lower net interest margins and reduced profitability.
Many of our non-bank competitors are not subject to the same extensive regulations that govern our activities and may have greater flexibility in competing for business. The financial services industry could become even more competitive as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and continued consolidation. In addition, some of our current commercial banking customers may seek alternative banking sources as they develop needs for credit facilities larger than we may be able to accommodate. Our inability to compete successfully in the markets in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We expect that our business will remain subject to extensive regulation and supervision and that the level of scrutiny and the enforcement environment may fluctuate over time, based on numerous factors, including changes in thestate Unitedand Statesfederal presidentialpolitical administration or one or both houses of Congressbodies and public sentiment regarding financial institutions (which can be influenced by scandals and other incidents that involve participants in the financial services industry). We are unable to predict the form or nature of any future changes to the laws, rules, regulations, or supervisory guidance and policies, including the interpretation or implementation thereof. In addition, we face significant regulatory scrutiny, in the course of routine examinations and otherwise, and new regulations in response to negative developments in the banking industry, which may increase our cost of doing business and reduce our profitability. Among other things, there may be increased focus by both regulators and investors on deposit composition, the level of uninsured deposits, brokered deposits, unrealized losses in securities portfolios, liquidity, commercial real estate loan composition and concentrations, and capital as well as general oversight and control of the foregoing. We could face increased scrutiny or be viewed as higher risk by regulators and/or the investor community, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, changes in key personnel at the agencies that regulate the Company, including the federal banking regulators, may result in differing interpretations of existing rules and guidelines and potentially more stringent enforcement and more severe penalties than previously experienced. New regulations and modifications to existing regulations and supervisory expectations have increased, and may in the future increase, our costs over time, result in decreased revenues and net income, reduce our ability to compete effectively (particularly with non-bank financial institutions that may not be subject to the same laws and regulations), make it less attractive for us to continue providing certain products and services, or require changes to our existing regulatory compliance and risk management structure. Any future changes in federal and state law and regulations, as well as the interpretations and implementations, or modifications or repeals, of such laws and regulations, could affect us in substantial and unpredictable ways. RecentChanges in regulators and political developments, including the new presidential administrationbodies in the U.S.,U.S. have added additional uncertainty with respect to new laws or regulations or changes in the interpretations or enforcement of existing laws or regulations, including potential deregulation in some areas. In addition, litigation challenging actions or regulations by federal or state authorities could, depending on the outcome, significantly affect the regulatory and supervisory framework affecting our operations. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Fee revenues from overdraft protection programs constitute a portion of our noninterest income and may be subject to increased supervisory scrutiny.
Revenues derived from transaction fees associated with overdraft protection programs offered to our customers are included in noninterest income. Members of Congress and the leadership of the OCC and CFPB have expressed a heightened interest in bank overdraft protection programs. On December 12, 2024, the CFPB finalized a rule that significantly reforms the regulatory framework governing overdraft practices applicable to banks such as FHB that have more than $10 billion in assets. The rule will become effective on October 1, 2025. The new rule will likely result in decreased revenue from overdraft transaction fees for FHB. See “Item 1. Business — Supervision and Regulation — Consumer Financial Protection” herein for more information about this rule. These actions are a component of the CFPB’s broader supervision and enforcement initiative targeting so-called consumer “junk fees.” In addition, the Comptroller of the Currency has identified potential options for reform of national bank overdraft protection practices, including providing a grace period before the imposition of a fee, refraining from charging multiple fees in a single day and eliminating fees altogether.
In response to this increased congressional and regulatory scrutiny, and in anticipation of enhanced supervision and enforcement of overdraft protection practices in the future, certain banking organizations have modified their overdraft protection programs, including by discontinuing the imposition of overdraft transaction fees. These competitive pressures from our peers, as well as any further adoption by our regulators of new rules or supervisory guidance or more aggressive examination and enforcement policies in respect of banks’ overdraft protection practices, could cause us to modify our program and practices in ways that may have a negative impact on our revenue and earnings, which, in turn, could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, as supervisory expectations and industry practices regarding overdraft protection programs change, our continued offering of overdraft protection may result in negative public opinion and increased reputation risk.
The content and application of laws and regulations applicable to financial institutions vary according to the size of the institution, the jurisdictions in which the institution is organized and operates and other factors. Some of our non-bank competitors are not subject to the same extensive regulations we are, and, as a result, may be able to compete more effectively for business. In particular, the activity of private creditors and other financial technology companies (“fintechs”) has grown significantly over recent years and is expected to continue to grow. Fintechs have and may continue to offer bank or bank-like products. For example, a number of fintechs have applied for, and in some cases received, bank or industrial loan charters. In addition, otherOther fintechs have partnered with existing banks to allow them to offer deposit products to their customers. Regulatory changes may also make it easier for fintechs to partner with banks and offer deposit products. Other regulation has reduced the regulatory burden of large bank holding companies, and raised the asset thresholds at which more onerous requirements apply, which could cause certain large bank holding companies with less than $250 billion in total consolidated assets, which were previously subject to more stringent enhanced prudential standards, to become more competitive or to pursue expansion more aggressively. There is also increased competition by out-of-market competitors through online and mobile channels. In addition, the emergence, adoption and evolution of new technologies that do not require intermediation, including distributed ledgers, as well as advances in automation, could significantly affect competition for financial services. Our profitability depends upon our continued ability to compete successfully in our market area.
Recent regulatory changes have reduced the regulatory burden of large bank holding companies, and raised the asset thresholds at which more onerous requirements apply, which could cause certain large bank holding companies with less than $250 billion in total consolidated assets, which were previously subject to more stringent enhanced prudential standards, to become more competitive or to pursue expansion more aggressively. There is also increased competition by out-of-market competitors through online and mobile channels.
In addition, the emergence, adoption and evolution of new technologies that do not require intermediation, including distributed ledgers, as well as advances in automation, could significantly affect competition for financial services. In July 2025, President Trump signed into law the GENIUS Act, which establishes a regulatory framework for “payment stablecoins” and their issuers. Consumers and businesses may view payment stablecoins as a substitute for traditional bank deposits, resulting in deposit withdrawals. Depending on consumer and business interest in payment stablecoins, and the characteristics and utility of payment stablecoins, the passage of the GENIUS Act requires the U.S. Treasury Department and federal and state regulators to issue regulations on numerous topics to interpret and implement the statute, so the effect of the GENIUS Act will depend on what those regulations provide.
Our profitability depends upon our continued ability to compete successfully in our market area.
Climate-related physical and transition risks could have a material negative impact on us and our customers, and divergent and evolving laws and regulations and stakeholder expectations regarding climate-related matters may subject us to additional, different and potentially conflicting requirements and expectations and result in higher regulatory and compliance and other risks and costs.
Climate change could have a material negative impact on us and our customers.
Our business, as well as the operations and activities of our customers, could be negatively impacted by climateclimate-related change.physical Climateand changetransition presentsrisks. Climate-related risks present both immediate and long-term risks to us and our customers and these risks are expected tomay increase over time. ClimateClimate-related changerisks presentspresent multi-faceted risks, including (i) operational risk from the physical effects of climate events on our facilities and other assets as well as those of our customers; (ii) credit risk from borrowers with significant exposure to climateclimate-related riskrisks; (iii) legal, regulatory and compliance risks arising from the policy, legal and regulatory changes associated with the transition to a less carbon-dependent economy; and (iv) reputationalrisk riskof harm to our brand from stakeholder concerns about our practices related to climateclimate-related change,risks, our carbon footprint and our decision to change or continue to maintain our business relationships with customers who operate in carbon-intensive industries, and from negative public opinion related to any of our actual or perceived actions or inaction in response to climateclimate-related changerisks and our climate change strategy.
For instance, climate change exposes uswe and our customers are exposed to physical risk as its effects may lead to more frequent and more extreme weather events, such as prolonged droughts or flooding, tornados, hurricanes, wildfires and extreme seasonal weather; and longer-term shifts, such as increasing average temperatures, ozone depletion and rising sea levels. As our primary markets are located on islands in the Pacific Ocean, they may be particularly susceptible to certain of these risks or other risksclimate-related resulting from climate change,risks, including those relating to rising sea levels. Such events and long-term shifts may result in destruction or impairment of properties, disruptions to business operations, or reduced availability or increased price of insurance and may have a significant impact on our customers, which could amplify credit risk by diminishing borrowers’ repayment capacity or collateral values, and other businesses and counterparties with whom we transact, which could have a broader impact on the economy, supply chains and distribution networks. Furthermore, we would be exposed to a great deal of uncertainty when recovering from such events, including the time it will take to rebuild physically and economically and the amounts of insurance coverage or government assistance available to our affected customers.
ClimateThe changeCompany may also resultbecome insubject to new and/or more stringent climate-related legal and regulatory requirements for the Company,requirements, which could materially affect the Company’s results of operations by requiring the Company to take costly measures to comply with any newsuch laws or regulations related to climate change that may be forthcoming.regulations. Ongoing legislative or regulatory uncertainties and changes regarding, climate risk management and practices may also subject us to different and potentially conflicting requirements in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. New regulations or guidance, or the attitudes of regulators, shareholders and employees regarding climateclimate-related change,matters, may affect the activities in which the Company engages and the products that the Company offers. In addition, an increasing perspective that financial institutions, including the Company, play an important role in managingClimate-related risks related to climate change, including indirectly with respect to their customers, may result in increased pressure on the Company to take additional steps to disclose and manage its climate risks and related lending and other activities. Risks associated with climate change are continuing to evolve rapidly, making it difficult to assess the effects of climatesuch changerisks on the Company, and the Company expects that climate change-relatedclimate-related risks will continue to evolve and may increase over time. If our actual or perceived action or inaction in response to these climate change-related risks are, or are perceived to be, ineffective or insufficient, or if we participate in, or decide not to participate in, certain industries or activities perceived to be associated with causing or exacerbating climateclimate-related change,risks, we could be subject to enforcement and other supervisory or government actions, reputational damage, a loss of customer or investor confidence, difficulty retaining or attracting talented employees, or other harm.
We also issue shares of common stock as part of our employee and non-employee director compensation programs. We currently maintain the First Hawaiian, Inc. 2025 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, the Amended & Restated 2016 Non-Employee Director Plan and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, pursuant to which plans we may issue our common stock. In addition, we maintain the First Hawaiian, Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2016 Plan” and, together with the other plans listed in the preceding sentence, the “Equity Compensation Plans”). Though we may not make further equity awards under the 2016 Plan, we have unvested equity awards that remain outstanding under such plan. Collectively, we have 5,294,029 shares of common stock available for future grants that could be issued pursuant to the Equity Compensation Plans as of December 31, 2025, and we issued 286,912, 277,713, and 255,434 shares of common stock, net of shares withheld to satisfy tax obligations, under the Equity Compensation Plans during the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. We may increase the number of shares available for issuance pursuant to equity compensation plans from time to time, subject to stockholder approval.
We have filed a registration statement to register 6,253,385 shares of our common stock for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the equity incentive and employee stock purchase plans. In April 2021, our stockholders approved an amendment and restatement of the First Hawaiian, Inc. 2016 Non-Employee Director Plan principally to increase the total number of shares of common stock that may be awarded under that plan by 193,941 shares. We have granted awards covering 4,063,680 shares of our common stock under these plans as of December 31, 2024. We may increase the number of shares registered for this purpose from time to time, subject to stockholder approval. Once we register and issue these shares, their holders will be able to sell them in the public market, subject to applicable transfer restrictions.
Provisions of federal banking laws, including regulatory approval requirements, could make it difficult for a third partythird-party to acquire us, even if doing so would be perceived to be beneficial to our stockholders. Acquisition of 10% or more of any class of voting stock of a bank holding company or depository institution, including shares of our common stock, generally creates a rebuttable presumption that the acquirer “controls” the bank holding company or depository institution. Also, a bank holding company must obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before, among other things, acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any bank, including our bank.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
Removed heading “Effect of Recent Natural Disasters”
Removed heading “Other Economic Developments”
Removed heading “Pension and Postretirement Benefit Obligations”
Largest changes
Net income for the Commercial Banking segment wassee in full comparison$95.2$130.0 million for the year ended December 31,2023,2025, a decrease of$0.6$13.0 million or1%9% as compared to2022.2024. The decrease in net income for the Commercial Banking segment was primarily due to aProvision of $15.0$23.0 millionfordecreasetheinyearnetendedinterestDecember 31, 2023, compared toincome, anegative Provision of $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, in addition to a $2.9$3.8 million increase in the Provision and a $1.1 million decrease in noninterest income, partially offset by a $10.6 million decrease in noninterest expense and a$2.2 million decrease in noninterest income. This was partially offset by an $18.4 million increase in net interest income and a $2.2$4.4 million decrease in the provision for income taxes. Theincreasedecrease inthenetProvisioninterest income was primarily due toanlower loan and lease spreads and deposits spreads, partially offset by higher average deposit balances. The increase inourtheprovision for credit losses for loans and leasesProvision allocated to the Commercial Bankingsegment. The increase in noninterest expensesegment was primarily due toan increase in regulatory assessment and fees, a one-time settlement expense in connection to a lawsuit against the Company mentioned previously, andincreases insalariesthe provision for home equity lines, commercial andbenefitsindustrialexpenseloans, construction loans, commercial real estate loans andcardleaserewards program expense, partially offset by lower overall expenses that were allocated to the Commercial Banking segment.financing. The decrease in noninterest income was primarily due to a decrease in credit and debit cardfees.fees and an excise tax refund and insurance proceeds received in 2024, partially offset by increases in customer-related interest rate swap fees, volume-based incentives and service charges on deposit accounts. Theincreasedecrease innetnoninterestinterest incomeexpense was primarily due to higherloanoverallaveragecreditsbalancesthat were allocated to the Commercial Banking segment andspreads, partially offset bya decrease inloanregulatory assessment and fees. The decrease in the provision for income taxes was primarily due to the decrease in pretaxincome.income, in addition to the allocation of the remeasurement of the California deferred tax assets. Theincreasedecrease in total earning assets for the Commercial Banking segment was primarily due toincreasesa decrease in our commercial loanand lease financing portfolios, partially offset by a decrease in our consumer loanportfolio.
“Economic conditions and therefore our results of operations may be impacted by a variety of other factors as well, such as other natural disasters, an economic slowdown or recession, financial market volatility, supply chain disruptions, monetary and fiscal policy measures, heightened geopolitical tensions, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates, the political and regulatory environment, changes to the U.S. Federal budget and potential changes in tax laws.”see in full comparison
Netsee in full comparisonlossincome for theTreasuryCommercialand OtherBanking segment was$43.3$143.0 million for the year ended December 31,2023,2024, an increasein net lossof$33.6$38.3 million or 37% as compared to2022.2023. The increase in netlossincome for the Commercial Banking segment was primarily due to a$46.6$22.3 million decrease in noninterest expense, an $11.5 million increase in net interest income, a $5.8 million decrease in the Provision and a $4.1 million increase in noninterestexpense and a $17.8 million decrease in net interestincome, partially offset by a$19.9 million increase in noninterest income, a $9.1$5.4 million increase in thebenefitprovision for incometaxes and a $1.7 million decrease in the Provision.taxes. Theincreasedecrease in noninterest expense was primarily due to lower overallcreditsexpenses that were allocated to theTreasuryCommercial Banking segment, a one-time settlement expense in connection to a lawsuit against the Company incurred in 2023 andOtherasegment and increasesdecrease inequipment expense, salaries and employee benefits expense andregulatory assessment andfees. This wasfees, partially offset bydecreasesan increase incontractedcardservicesrewardand professional fees and occupancy expense.expenses. Thedecreaseincrease in net interest income was primarily due toanhigherincreasedepositin interest expense from public depositsspreads andhigheraverageborrowing costs,balances, partially offset byanlowerincreaseloaninandnetleasetransferspreads.pricingThecredits that residedecrease in theTreasuryProvision was primarily due to a decrease in our provision for credit losses for loans andOtherleasessegmentallocatedandtohighertheyieldsCommercialonBankingour interest-bearing deposits in other banks.segment. The increase in noninterest income was primarily due to an excise tax refund received in 2024, in addition to increases inBOLIcreditincome,andadebitgaincard fees, other service charges and fees and service charges onthedepositsale of a bank property in 2023 mentioned previously, market adjustments on mutual funds purchased, income due to adjustments to certain liabilities assumed as a result of the Reorganization Transactions and net gains on the sale of investment securities,accounts, partially offset byanaincreasedecrease innetvolume-basedlosses recognized in income related to derivative contracts.incentives. The increase in thebenefitprovision for income taxes was primarily due to the increase in pretaxloss. The decrease in the Provision was primarily due to the decrease in the provision for unfunded home equity line commitments.income. The increase in total earning assets for theTreasuryCommercialand OtherBanking segment was primarily due toan increaseincreases in ourinterest-bearingcommercialdepositsloaninandotherleasebanks,financing portfolios, partially offset by a decrease in ourinvestmentconsumersecuritiesloan portfolio.
“Net income for the Commercial Banking segment was $132.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $37.3 million or 39% as compared to 2023. The increase in net income for the Commercial Banking segment was primarily due to a $22.3 million decrease in noninterest expense, a $10.1 million increase in net interest income, a $5.8 million decrease in the Provision and a $4.1 million increase in noninterest income, partially offset by a $5.0 million increase in the provision for income taxes. …”see in full comparison
Other noninterest expense was $52.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, a decrease of $8.6 million or 14% as compared to 2024. This decrease was primarily due to a $4.6 million decrease in operational losses and other charge-offs, a $3.8 million decrease in expense due to adjustments to certain liabilities assumed as a result of the Reorganization Transactions, a $1.1 million decrease in costs associated with a fund acquired by the Company and a $0.6 million decrease in pension-related expenses. This was partially offset by a $1.0 million increase in charitable contributions and donations and a $0.7 million increase in brokers fees. Other noninterest expense was $61.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of $1.7 million or 3% as compared to 2023. This decrease was primarily due to a $3.3 million decrease in operational losses and other charge-offs, a $2.1 million decrease in charitable contributions, a $1.0 million decrease in pension-related expenses, a $0.8 million decrease in losses incurred due to natural disasters and a $0.6 million decrease in business privilege tax expense. This was partially offset by a $3.8 million increase in expense due to adjustments to certain liabilities assumed as a result of the Reorganization Transactions, a $1.0 million increase in brokers fees, a $0.6 million increase in costs associated with a fund acquired by the Company and a $0.6 million increase in other tax expense.see in full comparisonOther noninterest expense was $62.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of $5.7 million or 10% as compared to 2022. This increase was primarily due to a one-time settlement expense in connection to a lawsuit against the Company, a $2.7 million increase in charitable contributions and increases in postage expenses, signature-based card fraud expenses and travel expenses. This was partially offset by a $1.4 million decrease in pension-related expenses, and decreases in activity charges assessed on the Company’s bank accounts, general and administrative expenses primarily around supplies, insurance, meals and entertainment and shipping and delivery, software amortization expense, mortgage loan charges and other tax expense.
“We evaluate certain loans and leases, including commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate loans and construction loans, individually for impairment and non-accrual status. A loan is considered to be impaired when it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (114)
A number of important factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated in these forward-looking statements, including the following: the geographic concentration of our business; current and future market and economic conditions generally or in Hawaii, Guam and Saipan in particular, including inflationary pressures and interest rate environment; our dependence on the real estate markets in which we operate; concentrated exposures to certain asset classes and individual obligors; the effect of changes in interest rates on our business, including our net interest income, net interest margin, the fair value of our investment securities, and our mortgage loan originations, mortgage servicing rights and mortgage loans held for sale; the future value of the investment securities that we own; the possibility of a deterioration in credit quality in our portfolio; the possibility we might underestimate the credit losses inherent in our loan and lease portfolio; our ability to attract and retain customer deposits; our inability to receive dividends from our Bank, pay dividends to our common stockholders and satisfy obligations as they become due; our access to sources of liquidity and capital to address our liquidity needs; our ability to attract and retain skilled employees or changes in our management personnel; our ability to maintain our Bank's reputation; the failure to properly use and protect our customer and employee information and data; the possibility of employee misconduct or mistakes; the actual or perceived soundness of other financial institutions; the effectiveness of our risk management and internal disclosure controls and procedures; our ability to keep pace with technological changes; any failure or interruption of our information and communications systems; our ability to effectively compete with other financial services companies and the effects of competition in the financial services industry on our business; our ability to identify and address cybersecurity risks; the occurrence of fraudulent activity or effect of a material breach of, or disruption to, the security of any of our or our vendors’ systems; the development and use of AI; our ability to successfully develop and commercialize new or enhanced products and services; changes in the demand for our products and services; risks associated with the sale of loans and with our use of appraisals in valuing and monitoring loans; the possibility that actual results may differ from estimates and forecasts; fluctuations in the fair value of our assets and liabilities and off-balance sheet exposures; the effects of the failure of any component of our business infrastructure provided by a third partythird-party; the potential for environmental liability; the risk of being subject to litigation and the outcome thereof; the impact of, and changes in, applicable laws, regulations and accounting standards and policies; possible changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies of, and other activities undertaken by, governments, agencies, central banks and similar organizations, including as a result of changes following the recent U.S. electionorganizations; the effects of severe weather, geopolitical instability, including war, terrorist attacks, pandemics or other severe health emergencies and natural disasters and other external events; the potential impact of climate change; our ability to maintain consistent growth, earnings and profitability; the impact of any pandemic, epidemic or health-related crisis; our likelihood of success in, and the impact of, litigation or regulatory actions; our ability to continue to pay dividends on our common stock; contingent liabilities and unexpected tax liabilities that may be applicable to us as a result of the Reorganization Transactions; and damage to our reputation from any of the factors described above.
The foregoing factors should not be considered an exhaustive list and should be read together with the other cautionary statements set forth under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If one or more events related to these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may differ materially from what we anticipate. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and we do not undertake any obligation to update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, we were the largest full-service bank headquartered in Hawaii as measured by assets, loans and leases and net income. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had $23.8 billion of assets and $14.4$14.3 billion of gross loans and leases. We also generated $230.1$276.3 million of net income or diluted earnings per share of $1.79$2.20 for the year ended December 31, 2024.2025. We operate our business through threetwo operating segments: Retail Banking, Commercial Banking and TreasuryCommercial andBanking. All other activities, including Treasury, are reported in Corporate/Other. See “Note 22. Reportable Operating Segments” in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for more information.
Hawaii’s economy as a whole experienced mixed economic conditions during the year ended December 31, 2025. Although the economy remains relatively resilient inand maintains a lower unemployment rate than the wakecountry ofas a whole, the State continues to endure high consumer prices and thehousing Augustaffordability 2023challenges, wildfireswhich thatare expected to continue to affectwith the islandgradual pass-through of Maui.tariffs, as well as a steady out-migration of its population. According to the State of Hawaii Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism, the statewide seasonally adjusted unemployment rate was 3.0%2.2% at December 31, 20242025, comparedlower to 2.9% at December 31, 2023. Nationally,than the national seasonally adjusted unemployment rate wasof 4.1% at December 31, 2024 compared to 3.7% at December 31, 2023.4.4%.
Domestic visitor arrivals for the state remain stable, with the average daily domestic passenger counts for the year ended December 31, 20242025 being relatively similar to the average daily domestic passenger counts during the year ended December 31, 2023,2024, according to the Hawaii Tourism Authority. More generally, Hawaii’s economy depends significantly on conditions of the U.S. economy and key international economies, particularly Japan. International visitor arrivals from Japan during the year ended December 31, 2024 have increasednot significantlyyet as comparedrecovered to each of the last three years, but the level of arrivals from Japan still remains below pre-pandemic levelsarrival due to the weak yen.levels.
The local Oahu housing market hascontinues remainedto relatively stable, but is experiencingexperience some softening as compared to previous years primarily due to home prices continuing to rise and high mortgageincreased interest rates. According to the Honolulu Board of Realtors, the volume of single-family home sales increased by 9.1%,3.5%, while condominium sales decreased by 2.5%,1.1%, in each case when comparing the twelveyear monthsended ofDecember 202431, 2025 with the same period in 2023. When comparing the twelve months of 2024 with the same period in 2022, however, the volume of single-family home sales decreased by 19.6%, while condominium sales decreased by 29.8%.2024. The median price of a single-family home sold on Oahu in the twelve months of 20242025 was $1,100,000,$1,139,000, an increase of 4.8%3.5% fromcompared theto same period in 2023.2024. The median price of a condominium sold on Oahu in the2025 twelvewas months$507,000, a decrease of 20241.5% wascompared $515,000,to an increase of 1.3% from the same period in 2023.2024. As of December 31, 2024,2025, months of inventory of single-family homes and condominiums on Oahu remained low atwere approximately 2.6 and 5.9 months, respectively, as compared to 2.9 and 5.2 months, respectively.respectively, as of December 31, 2024.
Effect of Recent Natural Disasters
In early August of 2023, wildfires swept across several areas of Maui, impacting residents in upcountry Maui and devastating the historic town of Lahaina. The outstanding balance of real estate-secured loans in the Maui fire zones totaled approximately $96.8 million as of December 31, 2024. We are working closely with our resident and business borrowers to navigate the post-disaster period and are continuing to closely monitor the impact that the wildfires has had on our customers.
Other Economic Developments
Economic conditions and therefore our results of operations may be impacted by a variety of other factors as well, such as other natural disasters, an economic slowdown or recession, financial market volatility, supply chain disruptions, monetary and fiscal policy measures, heightened geopolitical tensions, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates, the political and regulatory environment, changes to the U.S. Federal budget and potential changes in tax laws.
These and other key factors could impact our profitability in future reporting periods. See Item 1A. Risk Factors, beginning in the section captioned “Summary of Risk Factors.”
Net income was $230.1$276.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, aan decreaseincrease of $4.9$46.1 million or 2%20% as compared to 2023.2024. Basic earnings per share was $1.80$2.21 for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, aan decreaseincrease of $0.04$0.41 or 2%23% as compared to 2023.2024. Diluted earnings per share was $1.79$2.20 for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, aan decreaseincrease of $0.05$0.41 or 3%23% as compared to 2023.2024. The decreaseincrease in net income was primarily due to a $15.0$41.0 million decreaseincrease in net interest income, a $31.2 million increase in noninterest income and a $13.4$1.8 million decrease in netnoninterest interest income.expense. This was partially offset by ana $11.9$15.5 million decreaseincrease in the provision for income taxes and a $12.5 million increase in the provision for credit losses (the “Provision”) and an $11.7 million decrease in the provision for income taxes..
Net income was $235.0$230.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023,2024, a decrease of $30.7$4.9 million or 12%2% as compared to 2022.2023. Basic and diluted earnings per share werewas both $1.84$1.80 for the year ended December 31, 2023,2024, a decrease of $0.24$0.04 or 12%2% as compared to 2022.2023. TheDiluted earnings per share was $1.79 for the year ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of $0.05 or 3% as compared to 2023.The decrease in net income was primarily due to a $60.7$15.0 million increasedecrease in noninterest expenseincome and a $25.2$13.4 million increasedecrease in thenet Provision.interest income. This was partially offset by aan $22.6$11.9 million increasedecrease in netthe interest income, a $21.3 million increase in noninterest incomeProvision and an $11.3$11.7 million decrease in the provision for income taxes.
Our return on average total assets was 0.96% for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of one basis point as compared to 2023, and our return on average total stockholders’ equity was 9.00% for the year ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of 101 basis points as compared to 2023. Our return on average tangible assets was 1.00% for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of one basis point as compared to 2023, and our return on average tangible stockholders’ equity was 14.74% for the year ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of 265 basis points as compared to 2023, due to an increase in average stockholders’ equity, which resulted in part from a decrease in net unrealized losses in our investment securities portfolio, and lower net income. Our efficiency ratio was 61.57% for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to 59.48% in 2023. Return on average tangible assets and return on average tangible stockholders’ equity are non-GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures for return on average tangible assets and return on average tangible stockholders’ equity, see Table 2, GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliation.
Our return on average total assets was 0.95%1.16% for the year ended December 31, 2023,2025, aan decreaseincrease of 1120 basis points as compared to 2022,2024, and our return on average total stockholders’ equity was 10.01%10.26% for the year ended December 31, 2023,2025, aan decreaseincrease of 143126 basis points as compared to 2022.2024. Our return on average tangible assets was 0.99%1.21% for the year ended December 31, 2023,2025, aan decreaseincrease of 1221 basis points as compared to 2022,2024, and our return on average tangible stockholders’ equity was 17.39%16.27% for the year ended December 31, 2023,2025, aan decreaseincrease of 264153 basis points as compared to 2022.2024, due to higher net income, offset by an increase in average tangible stockholders’ equity. Our efficiency ratio was 59.48%56.43% for the year ended December 31, 20232025 as compared to 55.20%61.57% in 2022.2024. Return on average tangible assets and return on average tangible stockholders’ equity are non-GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures for return on average tangible assets and return on average tangible stockholders’ equity, see Table 2, GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliation.
Our return on average total assets was 0.96% for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of one basis point as compared to 2023, and our return on average total stockholders’ equity was 9.00% for the year ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of 101 basis points as compared to 2023. Our return on average tangible assets was 1.00% for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of one basis point as compared to 2023, and our return on average tangible stockholders’ equity was 14.74% for the year ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of 265 basis points as compared to 2023, due to an increase in average tangible stockholders’ equity, which resulted in part from a decrease in net unrealized losses in our investment securities portfolio, and lower net income. Our efficiency ratio was 61.57% for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to 59.48% in 2023. Return on average tangible assets and return on average tangible stockholders’ equity are non-GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures for return on average tangible assets and return on average tangible stockholders’ equity, see Table 2, GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliation.
Our results for the December 31, 2025 were highlighted by the following:
Our results for the December 31, 2023 were highlighted by the following:
Net interest income, on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, was $667.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, an increase of $39.6 million or 6% as compared to 2024. Our net interest margin was 3.15% for the year ended December 31, 2025, an increase of 20 basis points as compared to 2024. The increase in net interest income, on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, was primarily due to lower deposit funding costs, higher average balances on our interest-bearing deposits in other banks and lower borrowing costs. This was partially offset by lower rates on our earning assets driven by lower yields in our loan and lease portfolio and lower average balances in our investment securities portfolio. Deposit funding costs were $279.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, a decrease of $56.4 million or 17% compared to 2024, primarily due to a decrease in interest rates. Rates paid on our interest-bearing deposits were 206 basis points for the year ended December 31, 2025, a decrease of 45 basis points compared to 2024, primarily due to rate decreases. For the year ended December 31, 2025, the average balance of our interest-bearing deposits in other banks was $1.3 billion, an increase of $412.8 million or 46% compared to the same period in 2024. Total borrowing costs were $7.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, a decrease of $12.6 million or 63% compared to 2024. $250.0 million of FHLB advances matured during the third quarter of 2025. Yields on our loans and leases were 5.45% for the year ended December 31, 2025, a decrease of 20 basis points as compared to 2024, primarily due to decreases in yields from our adjustable-rate commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans, which are typically based on the SOFR. For the year ended December 31, 2025, average balances on our investment securities portfolio was $5.6 billion, a decrease of $420.7 million or 7% compared to 2024, primarily due to payments and maturities of securities during the period.
Net interest income, on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, was $641.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of $23.3 million or 4% as compared to 2022. Our net interest margin was 2.92% for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of 14 basis points as compared to 2022. The increase in net interest income, on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, was driven by the rising interest rate environment and was primarily due to higher yields and average balances in our loan and lease portfolio and higher yields on our interest-bearing deposits in other banks. This was partially offset by higher deposit funding cost and higher borrowing costs. Yields on our loans and leases were 5.26% for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of 142 basis points as compared to 2022. We experienced an increase in our yields from total loans and leases primarily due to increases in yields from our adjustable-rate commercial real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans and construction loans, which are largely based on the SOFR. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the average balance of our loan and lease portfolio was $14.3 billion, an increase of $951.5 million or 7% compared to the same period in 2022. The increase in the average balance of our loans and leases reflected increases in most loan categories. Yields on our interest-bearing deposits in other banks were 5.18% for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of 399 basis points compared to 2022. Deposit funding costs were $258.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of $209.0 million compared to 2022. Rates paid on our interest-bearing deposits were 198 basis points for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of 159 basis points compared to 2022. Total borrowing costs were $26.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of $25.8 million compared to 2022, primarily due to the FHLB repo advances and FHLB fixed-rate advances that originated during 2023.
The Federal Reserve influences the general market rates of interest, including the deposit and loan rates offered by many financial institutions. Our loan portfolio is affected by changes in the prime interest rate. The prime rate began in 20222023 at 3.25%7.50% and increased a total of 425 basis points (25 basis points in March, 50 basis points in May, 75 basis points in each month of June, July, September and November, and 50 basis points in December) to end the year at 7.50%. During 2023, the prime rate increased 100 basis points (25 basis points each in February, March, May and July) to end the year at 8.50%. InDuring 2024, the prime rate decreased a total of 100 basis points (50 basis points in September, and 25 basis points in both November and December) to end the year at 7.50%. In 2025, the prime rate decreased 75 basis points (25 basis points each in September, October and December) to end the year at 6.75%. Our loan portfolio is also impacted by changes in the SOFR. At December 31, 2025, the one-month and three-month CME Term SOFR interest rates were 3.70% and 3.66%, respectively. At December 31, 2024, the one-month and three-month CME Term SOFR interest rates were 4.33% and 4.31%, respectively. At December 31, 2023, the one-month and three-month CME Term SOFR interest rates were 5.35% and 5.33%, respectively. At December 31, 2022, the one-month and three-month CME Term SOFR interest rates were 4.36% and 4.59%, respectively. The target range for the federal funds rate, which is the cost of immediately available overnight funds, began in 20222023 at 0.00%4.25% to 0.25%,4.50%, and increased a total of 425 basis points to end the year at 4.25% to 4.50%. During 2023, the federal funds rate increased 100 basis points to end the year at 5.25% to 5.50%. InDuring 2024, the federal funds rate decreased a total of 100 basis points to end the year at 4.25% to 4.50%. ThereIn continues2025, the federal funds rate decreased 75 basis points to be uncertainty inend the changingyear marketat and economic conditions, including the possibility of additional measures that could be taken by the Federal Reserve and other government agencies related3.50% to the overall macroeconomic environment.3.75%.
The Provision was $14.8$27.2 million for the year ended December 31, 20242025, compared to a Provision of $26.6$14.8 million in 2023.2024. For the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, the Provision included $17.5$24.4 million in provision for credit losses for loans and leases, compared to $24.9$17.5 million in provision for credit losses for loans and leases in 2023,2024, and $2.9 million in provision for credit losses for the reserve for unfunded commitments, compared to a negative $2.8 million in provision for credit losses for the reserve for unfunded commitments, compared to $1.8 million in provision for credit losses for the reserve for unfunded commitments in 2023.2024. The increase in the Provision of $14.8 million was primarily due to decreasesincreases in the provision for home equity lines, commercial and industrial loans, construction loans, commercial real estate loans and homelease equity linesfinancing and the provision for unfunded commercial and industrial, construction, home equity line andline, commercial real estate and commercial and industrial commitments. This was partially offset by increasesdecreases in the provision for consumerresidential loans, commercial and industrialmortgage loans and residential mortgageconsumer loans. We recorded net charge-offs of $13.6$16.3 million and $12.2$13.6 million for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively. This represented net charge-offs of 0.10%0.11% and 0.09%0.10% of total average loans and leases for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively. The ACL was $160.4$168.5 million and $156.5$160.4 million as of December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively, and represented 1.18% of total outstanding loans and leases as of December 31, 2025, compared to 1.11% of total outstanding loans and leases as of December 31, 2024, compared to 1.09% of total outstanding loans and leases as of December 31, 2023.2024. The reserve for unfunded commitments was $35.7 million as of December 31, 2025, compared to $32.8 million as of December 31, 2024, compared to $35.6 million as of December 31, 2023.2024. The Provision is recorded to maintain the ACL and the reserve for unfunded commitments at levels deemed adequate by management based on the factors noted in the “Risk Governance and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk — Credit Risk” section of this MD&A.
Total noninterest income was $217.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, an increase of $31.2 million or 17% as compared to 2024. Total noninterest income was $185.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of $15.0 million or 7% as compared to 2023.
Service charges on deposit accounts were $31.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, an increase of 0.5 million or 2% as compared to 2024. This increase was primarily due to a $1.1 million increase in account analysis service charges, partially offset by a $0.3 million decrease in overdraft and checking account fees and a $0.2 million decrease in ATM interchange fees from customers. Service charges on deposit accounts were $31.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $1.4 million or 5% as compared to 2023. This increase was primarily due to a $2.6 million increase in account analysis service charges, partially offset by a $1.2 million decrease in overdraft and checking account fees.
Total noninterest income was $185.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of $15.0 million or 7% as compared to 2023. Total noninterest income was $200.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of $21.3 million or 12% as compared to 2022.
Service charges on deposit accounts were $31.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $1.4 million or 5% as compared to 2023. This increase was primarily due to a $2.6 million increase in account analysis service charges, partially offset by a $1.2 million decrease in overdraft and checking account fees. Service charges on deposit accounts were $29.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of $0.8 million or 3% as compared to 2022. This increase was primarily due to a $0.9 million increase in dormant account fees, a $0.7 million increase in account analysis service charges and a $0.6 million increase in overdraft and checking account fees, partially offset by a $1.1 million decrease in checking account service fees.
Credit and debit card fees were $61.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, a decrease of $2.6 million or 4% as compared to 2024. This decrease was primarily due to a $3.1 million decrease in interchange settlement fees and a $0.8 million decrease in ATM interchange and surcharge fees, partially offset by a $1.3 million increase in merchant service revenues. Credit and debit card fees were $64.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $0.5 million or 1% as compared to 2023. This increase was primarily due to a $2.6 million increase in debit card interchange fees, a $1.9 million decrease in network association dues and a $1.4 million increase in interchange settlement fees, partially offset by a $3.2 million decrease in ATM interchange and surcharge fees, a $1.3 million decrease in merchant service revenues and a $0.6 million decrease in rental fees from credit card terminals. Credit and debit card fees were $63.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, a decrease of $2.1 million or 3% as compared to 2022. This decrease was primarily due to a $3.1 million increase in network association dues, a $2.1 million decrease in merchant service revenues and a $1.0 million decrease in ATM interchange and surcharge fees, partially offset by a $3.1 million increase in interchange settlement fees and a $1.0 million increase in debit card interchange fees.
Other service charges and fees were $53.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, an increase of $7.3 million or 16% as compared to 2024. This increase was primarily due to a $7.3 million increase in fees from annuities and securities and a $0.8 million increase in fees from standby letters of credit arrangements, partially offset by a $0.3 million decrease in service fees related to participation loans, a $0.2 million decrease in online banking fees and a $0.2 million decrease in insurance income. Other service charges and fees were $45.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $8.6 million or 23% as compared to 2023. This increase was primarily due to a $6.9 million increase in fees from annuities and securities, a $0.3 million increase in safe deposit box rental fees, a $0.3 million increase in miscellaneous service fees, a $0.3 million increase in cash management service fees, a $0.3 million increase in insurance income and a $0.3 million increase in fees from standby letters of credit arrangements. Other service charges and fees were $37.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of $0.3 million or 1% as compared to 2022.
Trust and investment services income was $36.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, a decrease of $1.4 million or 4% as compared to 2024. This decrease was primarily due to a $2.4 million decrease in investment management fees and a $0.5 million decrease in irrevocable trust fees, partially offset by a $0.6 million increase in business cash management fees, a $0.4 million increase in pension plan fees and a $0.3 million increase in money market fund management fees. Trust and investment services income was $38.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of $0.1 million as compared to 2023.
Trust and investment services income was $38.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of $0.1 million as compared to 2023. Trust and investment services income was $38.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of $2.0 million or 5% as compared to 2022. This increase was primarily due to a $1.1 million increase in investment management fees and a $1.1 million increase in business cash management fees.
BOLI income was $20.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, an increase of $2.8 million or 15% as compared to 2024. This increase was due to a $4.7 million increase in BOLI earnings, partially offset by a $2.0 million decrease in death benefit proceeds from life insurance policies. BOLI income was $17.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $2.5 million or 17% as compared to 2023. This increase was due to a $3.0 million increase in BOLI earnings, partially offset by a $0.4 million decrease in death benefit proceeds from life insurance policies. BOLI income was $15.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of $14.1 million as compared to 2022. This increase was due to an $11.0 million increase in BOLI earnings and a $3.1 million increase in death benefit proceeds from life insurance policies.
Net gains on the sale of investment securities were nil for the year ended December 31, 2025. Net losses on the sale of investment securities were $26.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase in net losses of $27.0 million as compared to the same period in 2023. The net losses were primarily due to the investment portfolio restructuring and sale of investment securities resulting in a realized loss of $26.2 million. Net gains on the sale of investment securities were $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase in net gains of $0.8 million as compared to the same period in 2022. The net gains were primarily due to a $40.8 million net realized gain on the sale of the Company’s remaining approximately 120,000 Visa Class B restricted shares, partially offset by $40.0 million of net realized losses on sales of available-for-sale investment securities.2024.
Other noninterest income was $12.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, a decrease of $1.6 million or 11% as compared to 2024. This decrease was primarily due to a $3.7 million decrease in insurance proceeds received during 2025 as compared to 2024 and a $1.6 million excise tax refund received during the year ended December 31, 2024. This was partially offset by a $1.6 million increase in customer-related interest rate swap fees, a $1.1 million decrease in net losses recognized in income related to derivative contracts and a $1.0 million increase in volume-based incentives. Other noninterest income was $14.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of $1.0 million or 6% as compared to 2023. This decrease was primarily due to a $7.9 million gain on the sale of a bank property in 2023 and a $1.2 million decrease in volume-based incentives. This was partially offset by $4.1 million in insurance proceeds received during the year ended December 31, 2024, a $1.6 million excise tax refund received during the year ended December 31, 2024, a $1.5 million decrease in net losses recognized in income related to derivative contracts and a $0.5 million decrease in interest paid on collateral payments related to derivative instruments.
Other noninterest income was $14.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of $1.0 million or 6% as compared to 2023. This decrease was primarily due to a $7.9 million gain on the sale of a bank property in 2023 and a $1.2 million decrease in volume-based incentives. This was partially offset by $4.1 million in insurance proceeds received during the year ended December 31, 2024, a $1.6 million excise tax refund received during the year ended December 31, 2024, a $1.5 million decrease in net losses recognized in income related to derivative contracts and a $0.5 million decrease in interest paid on collateral payments related to derivative instruments. Other noninterest income was $15.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of $5.5 million or 55% as compared to 2022. This increase was primarily due to the $7.9 million gain on the sale of a bank property in 2023 mentioned previously, a $2.5 million increase in income due to adjustments to certain liabilities assumed as a result of the Reorganization Transactions, a $2.4 million increase in market adjustments on mutual funds purchased, a $1.5 million increase in volume-based incentives and a $0.9 million increase in net mortgage servicing rights income. This was partially offset by a $7.0 million increase in net losses recognized in income related to derivative contracts, a $1.2 million tax refund received during the year ended December 31, 2022, a $0.7 million decrease in customer-related interest rate swap fees and a $0.4 million decrease in debit card merchant discount fees.
Total noninterest expense was $499.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, a decrease of $1.8 million as compared to 2024. Total noninterest expense was $501.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $0.1 million as compared to 2023.
n/m – Denotes a variance that is not a meaningful metric to inform the change in noninterest expense from the year ended December 31, 2023 to the same period in 2022.
Total noninterest expense was $501.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $0.1 million as compared to 2023. Total noninterest expense was $501.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of $60.7 million or 14% as compared to 2022.
Salaries and employee benefits expense was $245.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, an increase of $10.3 million or 4% as compared to 2024. This increase was primarily due to a $10.7 million increase in incentive compensation, a $2.4 million increase in base salaries and related payroll taxes and a $0.5 million increase in group health plan costs. This was partially offset by a $2.0 million increase in payroll and benefit costs being deferred as loan origination costs, a $0.6 million decrease in state unemployment tax expense, a $0.3 million decrease in nonrecurring separation agreements and severance costs and a $0.3 million decrease in adjustments made to the deferred compensation plan as a result of market conditions. Salaries and employee benefits expense was $235.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $9.8 million or 4% as compared to 2023. This increase was primarily due to a $9.7 million increase in incentive compensation, a $1.8 million increase in retirement plan expenses, a $1.2 million decrease in payroll and benefit costs being deferred as loan origination costs and a $1.0 million increase in group health plan costs. This was partially offset by a $1.1 million decrease in other compensation, primarily related to a decrease in nonrecurring separation agreements and severance costs, partially offset by adjustments made to the deferred compensation plan as a result of market conditions, a $0.9 million decrease in employee overtime pay expense, a $0.9 million decrease in state unemployment tax expense and a $0.6 million decrease in temporary help expenses. Salaries and employee benefits expense was $225.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of $26.6 million or 13% as compared to 2022. This increase was primarily due to a $12.7 million increase in base salaries and related payroll taxes, a $10.7 million decrease in payroll and benefit costs being deferred as loan origination costs, a $4.3 million increase in other compensation, primarily related to adjustments made to the deferred compensation plan as a result of market conditions and nonrecurring separation agreements and severance costs, a $1.3 million increase in retirement plan expenses, a $1.1 million increase in state unemployment tax expense and a $0.8 million increase in group health plan costs. This was partially offset by a $2.2 million decrease in incentive compensation, a $1.1 million decrease in temporary help expenses and a $0.9 million decrease in employee overtime pay expense.
Contracted services and professional fees were $60.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, a decrease of $0.6 million or 1% as compared to 2024. This decrease was primarily due to a $1.1 million decrease in outside services, primarily attributable to technology-related projects, marketing and new customer services, and a $0.7 million decrease in audit, legal and consultant fees, partially offset by a $1.2 million increase in contracted data processing expenses. Contracted services and professional fees were $60.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of $5.5 million or 8% as compared to 2023. This decrease was primarily due to a $4.3 million decrease in outside services, primarily attributable to technology-related projects, marketing and new customer services, a $0.6 million decrease in contracted data processing expenses and a $0.6 million decrease in audit, legal and consultant fees.
Contracted services and professional fees were $60.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of $5.5 million or 8% as compared to 2023. This decrease was primarily due to a $4.3 million decrease in outside services, primarily attributable to technology-related projects, marketing and new customer services, a $0.6 million decrease in contracted data processing expenses and a $0.6 million decrease in audit, legal and consultant fees. Contracted services and professional fees were $66.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, a decrease of $3.6 million or 5% as compared to 2022. This decrease was primarily due to a $6.2 million decrease in contracted data processing expenses and a $3.2 million decrease in audit, legal and consultant fees. This was partially offset by a $5.8 million increase in outside services, primarily attributable to technology-related projects, marketing and new customer services.
Occupancy expense was $29.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of $0.6 million or 2% as compared to 2023. This decrease was due to a $0.5 million increase in net sublease rental income and a $0.3 million decrease in building depreciation, partially offset by a $0.4 million increase in lease-related insurance expense. Occupancy expense was $29.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, a decrease of $1.4 million or 5% as compared to 2022. This decrease was due to a $0.9 million decrease in building depreciation, a $0.7 million decrease in building maintenance expense and a $0.5 million decrease in utilities expense, partially offset by a $0.8 million decrease in net sublease rental income.
Equipment expense was $53.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $8.8 million or 19% as compared to 2023. This increase was primarily due to an $8.0 million increase in technology-related amortization and licensing and maintenance fees, a $0.5 million increase in furniture and equipment depreciation and a $0.3 million increase in other furniture and equipment expense. Equipment expense was $45.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of $10.6 million or 31% as compared to 2022. This increase was primarily due to an $11.8 million increase in technology-related amortization and licensing and maintenance fees, partially offset by a $0.9 million decrease in furniture and equipment depreciation.
Regulatory assessment and fees were $19.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of $13.0 million or 40% as compared to 2023. Regulatory assessment and fees were $32.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of $22.5 million as compared to 2022. In October 2022, the FDIC adopted a final rule to increase the initial base deposit insurance assessment rate schedules by 2 basis points beginning with the first quarterly assessment period of 2023. In May 2023, the FDIC issued a notice of proposed rulemaking for a special assessment to replenish the deposit insurance fund following the 2023 bank failures. In November 2023, the FDIC approved a final rule to implement the special assessment and we recorded a $16.3 million expense in December 2023. During the first quarter of 2024, the FDIC issued a notice that the original loss estimate related to the 2023 bank failures was subsequently increased and that this increase would result in an additional assessment expense to affected institutions. As a result, we recorded a net expense related to the special assessment of $3.5 million for year ended December 31, 2024.
Advertising and marketing expense was $7.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $0.1 million or 1% as compared to 2023. Advertising and marketing expense was $7.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, a decrease of $0.4 million or 5% as compared to 2022.
Card rewards programOccupancy expense was $33.8$30.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, an increase of $2.2$1.3 million or 7%4% as compared to 2023.2024. This increase was primarily due to a $1.6 million increase in creditbuilding card cash reward redemptions and a $1.6 million increase in interchange fees paid to our credit card partners,depreciation, partially offset by a $0.7$0.4 million decrease in priorityutilities rewardsexpense. card redemptions and a $0.3 million decrease in international transaction fees. Card rewards programOccupancy expense was $31.6$29.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023,2024, ana increasedecrease of $0.6 million or 2% as compared to 2022.2023. This increasedecrease was primarily due to a $2.1$0.5 million increase in creditnet cardsublease cashrental reward redemptionsincome and a $1.2$0.3 million increasedecrease in interchangebuilding fees paid to our credit card partners,depreciation, partially offset by a $2.5$0.4 million decreaseincrease in prioritylease-related rewardsinsurance card redemptions.expense.
Equipment expense was $56.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, an increase of $2.4 million or 4% as compared to 2024. This increase was primarily due to a $2.0 million increase in technology-related amortization and licensing and maintenance fees and a $0.6 million increase in furniture and equipment depreciation, partially offset by a $0.3 million decrease in other furniture and equipment expense. Equipment expense was $53.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $8.8 million or 19% as compared to 2023. This increase was primarily due to an $8.0 million increase in technology-related amortization and licensing and maintenance fees, a $0.5 million increase in furniture and equipment depreciation and a $0.3 million increase in other furniture and equipment expense.
Regulatory assessment and fees were $12.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, a decrease of $7.0 million or 37% as compared to 2024. Regulatory assessment and fees were $19.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of $13.0 million or 40% as compared to 2023. In October 2022, the FDIC adopted a final rule to increase the initial base deposit insurance assessment rate schedules by 2 basis points beginning with the first quarterly assessment period of 2023. In May 2023, the FDIC issued a notice of proposed rulemaking for a special assessment to replenish the deposit insurance fund following the 2023 bank failures. In November 2023, the FDIC approved a final rule to implement the special assessment and we recorded a $16.3 million expense in December 2023. During the first quarter of 2024, the FDIC issued a notice that the original loss estimate related to the 2023 bank failures was subsequently increased and that this increase would result in an additional assessment expense to affected institutions. As a result, we recorded a net expense related to the additional special assessment of $3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. In December 2025, the FDIC reduced the rate at which the assessment is collected for the eighth quarter of the collection period, with an invoice payment date of March 30, 2026, from 3.36 basis points to 2.97 basis points. We recorded a reduction in the expense related to the additional special assessment of $2.6 million in 2025 to bring the net loss to $0.9 million as of December 31, 2025.
Advertising and marketing expense was $8.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, an increase of $0.9 million or 11% as compared to 2024. This increase was primarily due to a $0.9 million increase in advertising costs. Advertising and marketing expense was $7.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $0.1 million or 1% as compared to 2023.
Card rewards program expense was $33.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, a decrease of $0.5 million or 1% as compared to 2024. This decrease was primarily due to a $0.4 million decrease in priority rewards card redemptions. Card rewards program expense was $33.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $2.2 million or 7% as compared to 2023. This increase was primarily due to a $1.6 million increase in credit card cash reward redemptions and a $1.6 million increase in interchange fees paid to our credit card partners, partially offset by a $0.7 million decrease in priority rewards card redemptions and a $0.3 million decrease in international transaction fees.
Other noninterest expense was $52.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, a decrease of $8.6 million or 14% as compared to 2024. This decrease was primarily due to a $4.6 million decrease in operational losses and other charge-offs, a $3.8 million decrease in expense due to adjustments to certain liabilities assumed as a result of the Reorganization Transactions, a $1.1 million decrease in costs associated with a fund acquired by the Company and a $0.6 million decrease in pension-related expenses. This was partially offset by a $1.0 million increase in charitable contributions and donations and a $0.7 million increase in brokers fees. Other noninterest expense was $61.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of $1.7 million or 3% as compared to 2023. This decrease was primarily due to a $3.3 million decrease in operational losses and other charge-offs, a $2.1 million decrease in charitable contributions, a $1.0 million decrease in pension-related expenses, a $0.8 million decrease in losses incurred due to natural disasters and a $0.6 million decrease in business privilege tax expense. This was partially offset by a $3.8 million increase in expense due to adjustments to certain liabilities assumed as a result of the Reorganization Transactions, a $1.0 million increase in brokers fees, a $0.6 million increase in costs associated with a fund acquired by the Company and a $0.6 million increase in other tax expense. Other noninterest expense was $62.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, an increase of $5.7 million or 10% as compared to 2022. This increase was primarily due to a one-time settlement expense in connection to a lawsuit against the Company, a $2.7 million increase in charitable contributions and increases in postage expenses, signature-based card fraud expenses and travel expenses. This was partially offset by a $1.4 million decrease in pension-related expenses, and decreases in activity charges assessed on the Company’s bank accounts, general and administrative expenses primarily around supplies, insurance, meals and entertainment and shipping and delivery, software amortization expense, mortgage loan charges and other tax expense.
The provision for income taxes was $78.0 million (reflecting an effective tax rate of 22.01%) for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared with a provision for income taxes of $62.5 million (reflecting an effective tax rate of 21.35%) forin 2024. On July 4, 2025, President Trump signed and enacted the yearOne endedBig DecemberBeautiful 31,Bill 2024,Act compared(“OBBBA”) withinto law. Its enactment did not have a provisionmaterial forimpact to our income taxestax ofexpense $74.2 million (reflecting anor effective tax raterate. ofThis 24.00%)legislation made significant changes to the energy credit provisions which may impact the Company’s ability to originate solar leases in 2023.the future. Additional information about the provision for income taxes is presented in “Note 15. Income Taxes” in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Our business segments are Retail Banking,Banking and Commercial Banking, andwith Treasuryall andother activities, including Treasury, reported in Corporate/Other. Table 7 summarizes net income (loss) from our business segments and Corporate/Other for the years ended December 31, 2024,2025, 20232024 and 2022.2023. Additional information about operating segment performance and Corporate/Other is presented in “Note 22. Reportable Operating Segments” in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2025, we realigned our internal organizational and management reporting structure. As a result of this change, we reduced our reportable operating segments from three to two. Our reportable segments are now Retail Banking and Commercial Banking. Activities previously reported within the Treasury and Other segment are now included in Corporate/Other, as Treasury exists to support our operating segments. The change in reportable segments reflects how our chief operating decision maker currently evaluates performance and allocates resources. In addition, during the third quarter of 2025, we made changes to the internal measurement of segment operating profits for the purpose of evaluating segment performance and resource allocation. The primary reason for the change was to align loan and deposit balances within the business segment that directly manages them. Specifically, certain loan and deposit balances previously included as part of the Retail Banking and Commercial Banking segments were reclassified among the segments and what is now Corporate/Other. The reallocation of select loan and deposit balances affected net interest income, net interest income after provision for credit losses, provision for income taxes, net income and segment earning assets. We have reported our selected financial information using the new loan and deposit balance alignments and using two reportable operating segments for the year ended December 31, 2025. Prior-period segment information has been recast to conform to the current presentation.
Net income for the Retail Banking segment was $238.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $55.4 million or 30% as compared to 2023. The increase in net income for the Retail Banking segment was primarily due to a $48.7 million increase in net interest income, a $9.2 million decrease in noninterest expense, a $8.4 million increase in noninterest income and a $1.6 million decrease in the Provision, partially offset by a $12.4 million increase in the provision for income taxes. The increase in net interest income was primarily due to higher deposit and loan spreads. The decrease in noninterest expense was primarily due to lower overall expenses that were allocated to the Retail Banking segment and a decrease in regulatory assessments and fees, partially offset by increases in salaries and employee benefits expense and brokers fees. The increase in noninterest income was primarily due to increases in other services charges and fees and service charges on deposit accounts. The decrease in the Provision was primarily due to a decrease in our provision for credit losses for loans and leases allocated to the Retail Banking segment. The increase in the provision for income taxes was primarily due to the increase in pretax income. The decrease in total earning assets for the Retail Banking segment was primarily due to a decrease in our residential real estate loan portfolio.
Net income for the Retail Banking segment was $183.1$250.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2023,2025, an increase of $3.4$22.7 million or 2%10% as compared to 2022.2024. The increase in net income for the Retail Banking segment was primarily due to a $21.9$24.8 million increase in net interest income andincome, a $3.6$5.6 million increase in noninterest income.income Thisand wasa $4.3 million decrease in noninterest expense, partially offset by ana $11.2$9.0 million increase in noninterestthe expenseprovision for income taxes and a Provision of $9.9$3.1 million forincrease in the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to a negative Provision of $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2022.Provision. The increase in net interest income was primarily due to higher deposit spreads,spreads partially offset by lowerand loan spreads. The increase in noninterest income was primarily due to increasesan increase in other service charges and fees, partially offset by a decrease in trust and investment services income, net mortgage servicing rights income and service charges on deposit accounts.income. The increasedecrease in noninterest expense was primarily due to increasesdecreases in salaries and employee benefits expense, regulatory assessments and fees, occupancy expensefees and costsoperational relatedlosses and other charge-offs. The increase in the provision for income taxes was primarily due to naturalthe disasterincrease events,in pretax income, partially offset by lowerthe overallallocation expensesof thatthe wereremeasurement of the California deferred tax assets. The increase in the Provision allocated to the Retail Banking segment. The increase in the Provisionsegment was primarily due to an increaseincreases in ourthe provision for credithome lossesequity forlines, commercial and industrial loans, construction loans, commercial real estate loans and leaseslease allocated to the Retail Banking segment.financing. The increase in total earning assets for the Retail Banking segment was primarily due to increases in our residentialcommercial real estateloan and commercialconsumer loan portfolios, partially offset by a decrease in our residential real estate loan portfolios.portfolio.
Net income for the Retail Banking segment was $227.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $54.3 million or 31% as compared to 2023. The increase in net income for the Retail Banking segment was primarily due to a $47.2 million increase in net interest income, a $9.2 million decrease in noninterest expense, a $8.4 million increase in noninterest income and a $1.6 million decrease in the Provision, partially offset by a $12.1 million increase in the provision for income taxes. The increase in net interest income was primarily due to higher deposit and loan spreads. The decrease in noninterest expense was primarily due to lower overall expenses that were allocated to the Retail Banking segment and a decrease in regulatory assessments and fees, partially offset by increases in salaries and employee benefits expense and brokers fees. The increase in noninterest income was primarily due to increases in other service charges and fees and service charges on deposit accounts. The decrease in the Provision was primarily due to a decrease in our provision for credit losses for loans and leases allocated to the Retail Banking segment. The increase in the provision for income taxes was primarily due to the increase in pretax income. The decrease in total earning assets for the Retail Banking segment was primarily due to a decrease in our residential real estate loan portfolio.
Net income for the Commercial Banking segment was $132.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $37.3 million or 39% as compared to 2023. The increase in net income for the Commercial Banking segment was primarily due to a $22.3 million decrease in noninterest expense, a $10.1 million increase in net interest income, a $5.8 million decrease in the Provision and a $4.1 million increase in noninterest income, partially offset by a $5.0 million increase in the provision for income taxes. The decrease in noninterest expense was primarily due to lower overall expenses that were allocated to the Commercial Banking segment, a one-time settlement expense in connection to a lawsuit against the Company incurred in 2023 and a decrease in regulatory assessment and fees, partially offset by an increase in card reward expenses. The increase in net interest income was primarily due to higher deposit spreads and average balances, partially offset by lower loan and lease spreads. The decrease in the Provision was primarily due to a decrease in our provision for credit losses for loans and leases allocated to the Commercial Banking segment. The increase in noninterest income was primarily due to an excise tax refund received in 2024, in addition to increases in credit and debit card fees, other service charges and fees and service charges on deposit accounts, partially offset by a decrease in volume-based incentives. The increase in the provision for income taxes was primarily due to the increase in pretax income. The increase in total earning assets for the Commercial Banking segment was primarily due to increases in our commercial real estate loan and lease financing portfolios, partially offset by a decrease in our consumer loan portfolio.
Net income for the Commercial Banking segment was $95.2$130.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023,2025, a decrease of $0.6$13.0 million or 1%9% as compared to 2022.2024. The decrease in net income for the Commercial Banking segment was primarily due to a Provision of $15.0$23.0 million fordecrease thein yearnet endedinterest December 31, 2023, compared toincome, a negative Provision of $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, in addition to a $2.9$3.8 million increase in the Provision and a $1.1 million decrease in noninterest income, partially offset by a $10.6 million decrease in noninterest expense and a $2.2 million decrease in noninterest income. This was partially offset by an $18.4 million increase in net interest income and a $2.2$4.4 million decrease in the provision for income taxes. The increasedecrease in thenet Provisioninterest income was primarily due to anlower loan and lease spreads and deposits spreads, partially offset by higher average deposit balances. The increase in ourthe provision for credit losses for loans and leasesProvision allocated to the Commercial Banking segment. The increase in noninterest expensesegment was primarily due to an increase in regulatory assessment and fees, a one-time settlement expense in connection to a lawsuit against the Company mentioned previously, and increases in salariesthe provision for home equity lines, commercial and benefitsindustrial expenseloans, construction loans, commercial real estate loans and cardlease rewards program expense, partially offset by lower overall expenses that were allocated to the Commercial Banking segment.financing. The decrease in noninterest income was primarily due to a decrease in credit and debit card fees.fees and an excise tax refund and insurance proceeds received in 2024, partially offset by increases in customer-related interest rate swap fees, volume-based incentives and service charges on deposit accounts. The increasedecrease in netnoninterest interest incomeexpense was primarily due to higher loanoverall averagecredits balancesthat were allocated to the Commercial Banking segment and spreads, partially offset by a decrease in loanregulatory assessment and fees. The decrease in the provision for income taxes was primarily due to the decrease in pretax income.income, in addition to the allocation of the remeasurement of the California deferred tax assets. The increasedecrease in total earning assets for the Commercial Banking segment was primarily due to increasesa decrease in our commercial loan and lease financing portfolios, partially offset by a decrease in our consumer loan portfolio.
Treasury and Other. Our Treasury and Other segment includes our treasury business, which consists of corporate asset and liability management activities, including interest rate risk management. The assets and liabilities (and related interest income and expense) of our treasury business consist of interest-bearing deposits, investment securities, federal funds sold and purchased, government deposits, short and long-term borrowings and bank-owned properties. Our primary sources of noninterest income are from BOLI, net gains from the sale of investment securities, foreign exchange income related to customer driven cross-border wires for business and personal reasons and management of bank-owned properties in Hawaii and Guam. The net residual effect of the transfer pricing of assets and liabilities is included in Treasury and Other, along with the elimination of intercompany transactions.
Other organizational units (Technology, Operations, Credit and Risk Management, Human Resources, Finance, Administration, Marketing, and Corporate and Regulatory Administration) provide a wide range of support to our other income earning segments. Expenses incurred by these support units are charged to the applicable business segments through an internal cost allocation process.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
New heading “Risks Related to the Pending Mergers and First Hawaiian Following Completion of the Mergers”
New heading “First Hawaiian and TriCo have incurred and are expected to incur substantial costs related to the mergers.”
New heading “Combining First Hawaiian and TriCo may be more difficult, costly or time-consuming than expected, and First Hawaiian and TriCo may fail to realize the anticipated strategic benefits of the mergers.”
New heading “The future results of First Hawaiian following the completion of the mergers may suffer if First Hawaiian does not effectively manage its expanded operations.”
New heading “First Hawaiian may be unable to retain legacy First Hawaiian or TriCo personnel successfully after the completion of the mergers.”
New heading “Regulatory approvals may not be received, may take longer than expected, or may impose conditions that are not presently anticipated or that could have an adverse effect on First Hawaiian following the mergers.”
New heading “If the requisite approvals of First Hawaiian stockholders or TriCo shareholders are not obtained, or other conditions to the closing of the mergers are not met, the merger agreement may be terminated in accordance with its terms and the mergers may not be completed.”
New heading “Failure to complete the mergers could negatively impact First Hawaiian.”
New heading “First Hawaiian and TriCo will be subject to business uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the mergers are pending.”
New heading “The merger agreement limits First Hawaiian’s ability to pursue alternatives to the mergers and may discourage other companies from trying to acquire First Hawaiian.”
New heading “The fixed exchange ratio and the issuance of a substantial number of shares of First Hawaiian common stock will dilute existing First Hawaiian stockholders and may adversely affect the market price of First Hawaiian common stock.”
New heading “The mergers may result in significant goodwill and other intangible assets that could become impaired and adversely affect First Hawaiian’s results of operations.”
New heading “Stockholder or shareholder litigation related to the mergers could prevent or delay the completion of the mergers, result in the payment of damages or otherwise negatively impact the business and operations of First Hawaiian and TriCo.”
Largest changes
“Stockholder or shareholder litigation related to the mergers could prevent or delay the completion of the mergers, result in the payment of damages or otherwise negatively impact the business and operations of First Hawaiian and TriCo.”see in full comparison
“The mergers may result in significant goodwill and other intangible assets that could become impaired and adversely affect First Hawaiian’s results of operations.”see in full comparison
“Stockholders of First Hawaiian and/or shareholders of TriCo may file lawsuits against First Hawaiian, TriCo and/or the directors or officers of either company in connection with the mergers. One of the conditions to the closing is that no order, injunction or decree issued by any court or agency of competent jurisdiction or other law preventing or making illegal the consummation of the mergers, the bank merger or any of the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement be in effect. …”see in full comparison
“First Hawaiian expects to recognize goodwill and other intangible assets, including a core deposit intangible, in connection with the mergers. Goodwill will not be amortized but will be tested for impairment at least annually and upon the occurrence of events or changes in circumstances indicating that impairment may have occurred. Finite-lived intangible assets, including the core deposit intangible, will be amortized over their estimated useful lives and evaluated for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. …”see in full comparison
“If the requisite approvals of First Hawaiian stockholders or TriCo shareholders are not obtained, or other conditions to the closing of the mergers are not met, the merger agreement may be terminated in accordance with its terms and the mergers may not be completed.”see in full comparison
“The fixed exchange ratio and the issuance of a substantial number of shares of First Hawaiian common stock will dilute existing First Hawaiian stockholders and may adversely affect the market price of First Hawaiian common stock.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (34)
Item 1A of Part I of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, filed with the SEC on February 27, 2026 contains a discussion of our risk factors. Except as set forth in this Item 1A and to the extent that additional factual information disclosed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relates to such risk factors, there are no material changes from the risk factors as disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Risks Related to the Pending Mergers and First Hawaiian Following Completion of the Mergers
First Hawaiian and TriCo have incurred and are expected to incur substantial costs related to the mergers.
First Hawaiian and TriCo have incurred and expect to incur a number of significant non-recurring costs associated with the mergers. These costs include legal, financial advisory, accounting, consulting and other advisory fees, severance/employee benefit-related costs, public company filing fees and other regulatory fees, printing and mailing costs and other related costs. Some of these costs are payable by either First Hawaiian or TriCo regardless of whether or not the mergers are completed.
Combining First Hawaiian and TriCo may be more difficult, costly or time-consuming than expected, and First Hawaiian and TriCo may fail to realize the anticipated strategic benefits of the mergers.
The success of the mergers will depend, in part, on the ability to realize the anticipated strategic and financial benefits from combining the businesses of First Hawaiian and TriCo, including geographic expansion, the enhanced growth opportunities and broader product capabilities of the combined franchise. To realize the anticipated benefits from the mergers, following completion of the mergers, First Hawaiian must successfully integrate the businesses of First Hawaiian and TriCo in a manner that permits those benefits to be realized without adversely affecting current revenues and future growth. If First Hawaiian and TriCo are not able to successfully achieve these objectives, the anticipated benefits of the mergers may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected. In addition, any cost savings of the mergers could be less than anticipated, and integration may result in additional and unforeseen expenses.
First Hawaiian and TriCo have operated and, until the effective time, must continue to operate, independently. It is possible that the integration process could result in the loss of key employees, diminished competitive position, loan and deposit attrition, the disruption of each company’s ongoing businesses or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies that adversely affect the companies’ ability to maintain relationships with clients, customers, depositors and employees or to achieve the anticipated benefits of the mergers. The conversion and migration of data, applications, systems and third-party interfaces could also be delayed or unsuccessful and could result in service interruptions, processing errors, data loss, cybersecurity or data-protection incidents, customer disruption or additional costs. Integration efforts between the companies may also divert management attention and resources. These integration matters could have an adverse effect on each of First Hawaiian and TriCo while the mergers are pending and on First Hawaiian for an undetermined period following completion of the mergers.
An inability to realize the full extent of the anticipated benefits of the mergers and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, as well as any delays encountered in the integration process, could have an adverse effect upon the revenues, levels of expenses and operating results of First Hawaiian following the completion of the mergers, which may adversely affect the value of the common stock of First Hawaiian following the completion of the mergers.
The future results of First Hawaiian following the completion of the mergers may suffer if First Hawaiian does not effectively manage its expanded operations.
Following the mergers, the size and geographic scope of the business of First Hawaiian will increase materially, including through the addition of significant branch-based retail and commercial banking operations in Northern and Central California. First Hawaiian’s future success will depend, in part, upon its ability to manage this expanded business, which may pose challenges for management, including challenges related to the management and monitoring of new operations and associated increased costs and complexity. First Hawaiian will also have greater exposure to economic, competitive, credit and other conditions affecting California. TriCo’s loan portfolio includes a substantial concentration in commercial real estate and multifamily loans, and the acquisition will increase First Hawaiian’s exposure to California real estate markets, collateral values and economic conditions. First Hawaiian may encounter challenges in maintaining TriCo’s local customer relationships and operating model while integrating the combined organization. First Hawaiian may also face increased compliance, risk-management, internal-control and supervisory complexity because of the increased size, geographic scope and complexity of its operations. There can be no assurance that First Hawaiian will be successful or that it will realize the expected operating efficiencies, revenue enhancement or other benefits currently anticipated from the mergers.
First Hawaiian may be unable to retain legacy First Hawaiian or TriCo personnel successfully after the completion of the mergers.
The success of the mergers will depend in part on First Hawaiian’s ability to retain the talent and dedication of key employees currently employed by First Hawaiian and TriCo. It is possible that these employees may decide not to remain with the applicable company while the mergers are pending or after the completion of the mergers. If First Hawaiian and TriCo are unable to retain key employees, including management, who are critical to the successful integration and future operations of First Hawaiian following the mergers, First Hawaiian and TriCo could face disruptions in their operations, loss of existing customers, loss of key information, expertise or know-how and unanticipated additional recruitment costs. In addition, following the completion of the mergers, if key employees terminate their employment, First Hawaiian’s business activities following the mergers may be adversely affected, and management’s attention may be diverted from successfully hiring suitable replacements, all of which may cause First Hawaiian’s business following the mergers to suffer. First Hawaiian and TriCo also may not be able to locate or retain suitable replacements for key employees.
Regulatory approvals may not be received, may take longer than expected, or may impose conditions that are not presently anticipated or that could have an adverse effect on First Hawaiian following the mergers.
Before the mergers and the bank merger may be completed, various approvals, consents, waivers, and/or non-objections must be obtained from the Federal Reserve Board, the FDIC, the Hawaii DFI, the California DFPI and other regulatory authorities in the United States. These approvals could be delayed or not obtained at all, including due to an adverse development in either party’s regulatory standing or in any other factors considered by regulators when granting such approvals; governmental, political or community group inquiries, investigations or opposition; or changes in legislation or the political environment generally.
The approvals that are granted may impose terms and conditions, limitations, obligations or costs, or place restrictions on the conduct of First Hawaiian’s business following the mergers or require changes to the terms of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. There can be no assurance that regulators will not impose any such conditions, limitations, obligations or restrictions and that such conditions, limitations, obligations or restrictions will not have the effect of delaying the completion of any of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, imposing additional material costs on or materially limiting the revenues of First Hawaiian following the mergers or otherwise reducing the anticipated benefits of the mergers if the mergers were consummated successfully within the expected time frame. In addition, there can be no assurance that any such conditions, terms, obligations or restrictions will not result in the delay or abandonment of the mergers. Additionally, the completion of the mergers is conditioned on the absence of certain orders, injunctions or decrees by any court or governmental entity of competent jurisdiction that would prohibit or make illegal the completion of any of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
In addition, neither First Hawaiian nor TriCo, nor any of their respective subsidiaries, is required or, without the written consent of the other party, permitted, to take any action, commit to take any action or agree to any condition or restriction in connection with obtaining the required permits, consents, approvals and authorizations of governmental entities or regulatory agencies that would reasonably be expected to have, either individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on First Hawaiian as the surviving entity and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, after giving effect to the mergers and the bank merger (a “materially burdensome regulatory condition”).
If the requisite approvals of First Hawaiian stockholders or TriCo shareholders are not obtained, or other conditions to the closing of the mergers are not met, the merger agreement may be terminated in accordance with its terms and the mergers may not be completed.
The merger agreement is subject to a number of conditions that must be fulfilled in order to complete the mergers. Those conditions include: (i) the approval by First Hawaiian stockholders of the First Hawaiian share issuance proposal and the approval by TriCo shareholders of the TriCo merger proposal; (ii) authorization for listing on Nasdaq of the shares of First Hawaiian common stock to be issued in the merger; (iii) the receipt of requisite regulatory approvals, including approvals, waivers or non-objections, as applicable, from the Federal Reserve Board, the FDIC, the Hawaii DFI and the California DFPI, and the expiration or termination of all statutory waiting periods in respect thereof, without any such requisite regulatory approval having resulted in the imposition of any materially burdensome regulatory condition; (iv) effectiveness of First Hawaiian’s registration statement on Form S-4 relating to the mergers; and (v) the absence of any order, injunction or decree issued by any court or agency of competent jurisdiction or other law preventing or making illegal the completion of the mergers, the bank merger or any of the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. Each party’s obligation to complete the mergers is also subject to certain additional customary conditions, including (a) subject to applicable materiality standards, the accuracy of the representations and warranties of the other party, (b) the performance in all material respects by the other party of its obligations under the merger agreement and (c) the receipt by each party of an opinion from its counsel to the effect that the mergers, taken together, will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. These conditions may not be fulfilled in a timely manner or at all, and, accordingly, the mergers may not be completed. In addition, the parties can mutually decide to terminate the merger agreement at any time, before or after the requisite First Hawaiian stockholder approval and TriCo shareholder approval, or First Hawaiian or TriCo may elect to terminate the merger agreement in certain other circumstances.
Failure to complete the mergers could negatively impact First Hawaiian.
If the mergers are not completed for any reason, including as a result of First Hawaiian stockholders’ failure to approve the First Hawaiian share issuance proposal or TriCo shareholders’ failure to approve the TriCo merger proposal, there may be various adverse consequences and First Hawaiian may experience negative reactions from the financial markets and from its customers and employees. For example, First Hawaiian’s business may be adversely impacted by the failure to pursue other beneficial opportunities due to the focus of management on the mergers, without realizing any of the anticipated benefits of completing the mergers. Additionally, if the merger agreement is terminated, the market price of First Hawaiian common stock could decline to the extent that current market prices reflect a market assumption that the mergers will be beneficial and will be completed. First Hawaiian also could be subject to litigation related to any failure to complete the mergers or to proceedings commenced against First Hawaiian to perform its obligations under the merger agreement. If the merger agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, either First Hawaiian or TriCo may be required to pay a termination fee of $80 million to the other party.
First Hawaiian and TriCo will be subject to business uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the mergers are pending.
Uncertainty about the effect of the mergers may have an adverse effect on First Hawaiian and TriCo. These uncertainties may impair First Hawaiian’s or TriCo’s ability to attract, retain and motivate key personnel and other employees until the mergers are completed. These uncertainties may also cause customers, suppliers, business partners and others that deal with First Hawaiian or TriCo to seek alternative relationships with third parties, seek to alter their business relationships with First Hawaiian or TriCo or fail to extend existing relationships with First Hawaiian or TriCo. In addition, subject to certain exceptions, First Hawaiian and TriCo have each agreed to operate its business in the ordinary course in all material respects and to refrain from taking certain actions that may adversely affect its ability to consummate the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement on a timely basis without the consent of the other party. These restrictions may prevent First Hawaiian and/or TriCo from pursuing attractive business opportunities that may arise prior to the completion of the mergers.
The merger agreement limits First Hawaiian’s ability to pursue alternatives to the mergers and may discourage other companies from trying to acquire First Hawaiian.
The merger agreement contains “no shop” covenants that restrict each of First Hawaiian’s and TriCo’s ability to, directly or indirectly, among other things, initiate, solicit, knowingly encourage or knowingly facilitate inquiries or proposals with respect to, or, subject to certain exceptions generally related to the exercise of fiduciary duties by each respective board of directors, engage or participate in any negotiations concerning, or provide any confidential or nonpublic information or data relating to, or have or participate in any discussions with any person relating to, any alternative acquisition proposals, subject to certain exceptions. These provisions may discourage a potential third-party acquirer that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant part of First Hawaiian or TriCo from considering or making that acquisition proposal.
The fixed exchange ratio and the issuance of a substantial number of shares of First Hawaiian common stock will dilute existing First Hawaiian stockholders and may adversely affect the market price of First Hawaiian common stock.
The fixed exchange ratio and the issuance of a substantial number of shares of First Hawaiian common stock will dilute existing First Hawaiian stockholders and may adversely affect the market price of First Hawaiian common stock.
Under the merger agreement, each eligible share of TriCo common stock will be converted into 2.095 shares of First Hawaiian common stock. Because the exchange ratio is fixed, the number of shares of First Hawaiian common stock to be issued in the merger will not be adjusted for changes in the market price of First Hawaiian common stock or TriCo common stock. Changes in the relative market prices or business performance of First Hawaiian and TriCo before the effective time could therefore make the economic terms of the mergers less favorable to First Hawaiian and its existing stockholders than they were on the date the merger agreement was signed.
Upon completion of the mergers, existing First Hawaiian stockholders and former TriCo shareholders are expected to own approximately 65% and 35%, respectively, of the outstanding shares of First Hawaiian common stock. The actual ownership percentages will depend on the number of shares of First Hawaiian common stock and TriCo common stock outstanding and the number and treatment of applicable TriCo equity awards at the effective time. The issuance of the merger consideration will dilute the relative voting and economic interests of existing First Hawaiian stockholders and may result in fluctuations in, or a decrease in, the market price of First Hawaiian common stock.
The mergers may result in significant goodwill and other intangible assets that could become impaired and adversely affect First Hawaiian’s results of operations.
In accordance with applicable accounting standards, First Hawaiian will account for the mergers as a business combination using the acquisition method of accounting. First Hawaiian will allocate the purchase consideration to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date, with the excess recorded as goodwill. The acquisition-date valuations of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed—including loans, securities, deposits, borrowings, identifiable intangible assets and related tax items—will be based on estimates and assumptions and may change as additional information becomes available during the applicable measurement period. Changes in those valuations could affect the amount of goodwill and other assets and liabilities recorded, the amount and timing of accretion, amortization and credit-loss expense and First Hawaiian’s future financial condition and results of operations.
First Hawaiian expects to recognize goodwill and other intangible assets, including a core deposit intangible, in connection with the mergers. Goodwill will not be amortized but will be tested for impairment at least annually and upon the occurrence of events or changes in circumstances indicating that impairment may have occurred. Finite-lived intangible assets, including the core deposit intangible, will be amortized over their estimated useful lives and evaluated for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Amortization expense and any impairment charge could adversely affect First Hawaiian’s results of operations and book value.
An impairment could result from, among other things, deterioration in the performance of the acquired business, deterioration in economic or market conditions in California or First Hawaiian’s other markets, adverse changes in laws or regulations affecting the banking industry, a decline in First Hawaiian’s stock price or the occurrence of a triggering event that compounds negative financial results, or other events or circumstances that reduce the estimated fair value of the applicable reporting unit or asset.
Stockholder or shareholder litigation related to the mergers could prevent or delay the completion of the mergers, result in the payment of damages or otherwise negatively impact the business and operations of First Hawaiian and TriCo.
Stockholders of First Hawaiian and/or shareholders of TriCo may file lawsuits against First Hawaiian, TriCo and/or the directors or officers of either company in connection with the mergers. One of the conditions to the closing is that no order, injunction or decree issued by any court or agency of competent jurisdiction or other law preventing or making illegal the consummation of the mergers, the bank merger or any of the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement be in effect. If any plaintiff were successful in obtaining an injunction prohibiting First Hawaiian or TriCo defendants from completing the mergers, the bank merger or any of the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, then such injunction may delay or prevent the consummation of the mergers and could result in significant costs to First Hawaiian and/or TriCo, including any cost associated with the indemnification of directors and officers of each company. First Hawaiian and TriCo may incur costs in connection with the defense or settlement of any stockholder or shareholder lawsuits filed in connection with the mergers, the bank merger or any other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. Such litigation could have an adverse effect on the financial condition and results of operations of First Hawaiian and could prevent or delay the completion of the mergers.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Pending Acquisition”
New heading “Voting and Support Agreements”
Removed heading “Loans and Leases”
Largest changes
“Other noninterest income was $6.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $3.0 million as compared to the same period in 2025. This increase was primarily due to $1.6 million in excise tax refunds received during the three months ended June 30, 2026, a $1.0 million increase in customer-related interest rate swap fees and a $0.8 million class action settlement the Company received during the three months ended June 30, 2026, partially offset by a $0.4 million decrease in insurance proceeds received. …”see in full comparison
“Net interest income, on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, was $340.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $14.4 million or 4% compared to the same period in 2025. Our net interest margin was 3.22% for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of 12 basis points from the same period in 2025. …”see in full comparison
Net income for the Commercial Banking segment wassee in full comparison$31.4$36.8 million for the three months endedMarchJune31,30, 2026, an increase of$0.6$3.8 million or2%11% as compared to the same period in 2025. The increase in net income for the Commercial Banking segment was primarily due to a$2.0$2.5 million increase in net interest income, a $2.4 million increase in noninterest income, a $0.9 million decrease in noninterest expense and a $0.8 million decrease in the Provision, partially offset by a$0.8$2.8 million increasein noninterest income and a $0.2 million decreasein the provision for incometaxes,taxes.partiallyTheoffset by a $2.0 million decreaseincrease in net interest income was primarily due to higher average loan balances andahigher$0.5loanmillionfees. The increase in noninterestexpense.income was primarily due to excise tax refunds received during the three months ended June 30, 2026 and an increase in customer-related interest rate swap fees. The decrease in noninterest expense was primarily due to higher overall credits that were allocated to the Commercial Banking segment. The decrease in the Provision allocated to the Commercial Banking segment was primarily due to decreases in the provision forconsumercommercial and industrial loans and residential mortgage loans, partially offset by increases in the provision forresidentialconsumer loans, construction loans and commercial real estate loans. The increasein noninterest income was primarily due to an increase in credit and debit card fees and an increase in service charges on deposit accounts. The decreasein the provision for income taxes was primarily due toantheincreaseallocation of the revaluation of the California deferred tax assets intax credits. The decrease in net interest income was primarily due to lower deposit spreads and lower loan and lease spreads, partially offset by higher average deposit balances and higher average loan balances. The increase in noninterest expense was primarily due to higher card reward program expense and higher salaries and employee benefits expense, partially offset by higher overall credits that were allocated to the Commercial Banking segment.2025.
“Net income for the Commercial Banking segment was $68.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $4.4 million or 7% as compared to the same period in 2025. The increase in net income for the Commercial Banking segment was primarily due to a $3.3 million increase in noninterest income and a $2.8 million decrease in the Provision, partially offset by a $2.5 million increase in the provision for income taxes. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (120)
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including the documents incorporated by reference herein, contains, and from time to time our management may make, forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to, among other things, future events and our financial performance. These statements are often, but not always, made through the use of words or phrases such as “may,” “might,” “should,” “could,” “predict,” “potential,” “believe,” “expect,” “continue,” “will,” “anticipate,” “seek,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “projection,” “would,” “annualized” and “outlook,” or the negative version of those words or other comparable words or phrases of a future or forward-looking nature. Statements regarding the expected timing, completion and effects of the proposed business combination between First Hawaiian, Inc. (“FHI”) and TriCo Bancshares (“TriCo”) and the plans, objectives and expectations of FHI are forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical or current facts, are forward-looking statements, and are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, management’s beliefs and certain assumptions made by management, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and beyond our control. Accordingly, we caution you that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, assumptions, estimates and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable as of the date made, actual results may prove to be materially different from the results expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.
A number of important factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated in these forward-looking statements, including the following: the geographic concentration of our business, current and future market and economic conditions generally or in Hawaii, Guam and Saipan in particular, including inflationary pressures and interest rate environment; our dependence on the real estate markets in which we operate; concentrated exposures to certain asset classes and individual obligors; the effect of changes in interest rates on our business, including our net interest income, net interest margin, the fair value of our investment securities, and our mortgage loan originations, mortgage servicing rights and mortgage loans held for sale; the future value of the investment securities that we own; the possibility of a deterioration in credit quality in our portfolio; the possibility we might underestimate the credit losses inherent in our loan and lease portfolio; our ability to attract and retain customer deposits; our inability to receive dividends from our bank, pay dividends to our common stockholders and satisfy obligations as they become due; our access to sources of liquidity and capital to address our liquidity needs; our ability to attract and retain skilled employees or changes in our management personnel; our ability to maintain our Bank's reputation; the failure to properly use and protect our customer and employee information and data; the possibility of employee misconduct or mistakes; the actual or perceived soundness of other financial institutions; the effectiveness of our risk management and internal disclosure controls and procedures; our ability to keep pace with technological changes; any failure or interruption of our information and communications systems; our ability to effectively compete with other financial services companies and the effects of competition in the financial services industry on our business; our ability to identify and address cybersecurity risks; the occurrence of fraudulent activity or effect of a material breach of, or disruption to, the security of any of our or our vendors’ systems; the development and use of AI; our ability to successfully develop and commercialize new or enhanced products and services; changes in the demand for our products and services; risks associated with the sale of loans and with our use of appraisals in valuing and monitoring loans; the possibility that actual results may differ from estimates and forecasts; fluctuations in the fair value of our assets and liabilities and off-balance sheet exposures; the effects of the failure of any component of our business infrastructure provided by a third party; the potential for environmental liability; the risk of being subject to litigation and the outcome thereof; the impact of, and changes in, applicable laws, regulations and accounting standards and policies; possible changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies of, and other activities undertaken by, governments, agencies, central banks and similar organizations, including trade and other geopolitical tensions resulting from conflicts in the Middle East, the imposition of tariffs and tightening of export control regulations; the effects of severe weather, geopolitical instability, including war, terrorist attacks, pandemics or other severe health emergencies and natural disasters and other external events; the potential impact of climate change; our ability to maintain consistent growth, earnings and profitability; our likelihood of success in, and the impact of, litigation or regulatory actions; our ability to continue to pay dividends on our common stock; contingent liabilities and unexpected tax liabilities that may be applicable to us as a result of the Reorganization Transactions; the failure to close our previously announced merger with TriCo when expected or at all because required regulatory, First Hawaiian stockholder, TriCo shareholder or other approvals, or other conditions to closing, are not received or satisfied on a timely basis or at all, and the risk that any regulatory approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the proposed merger; the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstances that could give rise to the right of one or both of the parties to terminate the Merger Agreement; the proposed merger being more expensive or taking longer to complete than anticipated, including as a result of unexpected factors or events; the diversion of management’s attention from ongoing business operations and opportunities due to the proposed merger; the dilutive effect of shares of our common stock to be issued in connection with the proposed merger; changes in our or TriCo’s share price before closing; the possibility that the anticipated benefits of the proposed merger with TriCo, including anticipated cost savings and strategic gains, are not realized when expected or at all, including as a result of the impact of, or problems arising from, the integration of the companies or as a result of the strength of the economy, competitive factors in the areas where we do business, or as a result of other unexpected factors or events; potential adverse reactions or changes to business or employee relationships, including those resulting from the announcement or completion of the proposed merger with TriCo; any change in the purchase accounting assumptions used regarding the TriCo assets acquired and liabilities assumed to determine the fair value and credit marks; and the outcome of any legal proceedings that may be instituted against FHI or TriCo related to the proposed merger; and damage to our reputation from any of the factors described above.
The foregoing factors should not be considered an exhaustive list and should be read together with the risk factors and other cautionary statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.2025, as well as the risk factors related to the proposed merger with TriCo set forth in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report. If one or more events related to these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may differ materially from what we anticipate. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and we do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
Pending Acquisition
On July 12, 2026, FHI and TriCo entered into a definitive agreement (the “Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein, Horizon Merger Sub, Inc., a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of FHI, will merge with and into TriCo, with TriCo surviving the merger. Immediately following the merger, TriCo will merge with and into FHI, with FHI continuing as the surviving entity. Promptly following that second-step merger, Tri Counties Bank will merge with and into First Hawaiian Bank, with First Hawaiian Bank continuing as the surviving bank. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, each share of TriCo common stock outstanding immediately prior to the effective time, subject to certain exceptions, will be converted into the right to receive 2.095 shares of First Hawaiian common stock, with cash paid in lieu of fractional shares. The exchange ratio is fixed, subject to adjustment as provided in the Merger Agreement.
See “Note 17. Subsequent Event” contained in our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for more information.
Voting and Support Agreements
On July 12, 2026, concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement, FHI entered into voting and support agreements with each member of the TriCo board of directors (the “Voting and Support Agreements”), on identical terms except for the identity of the TriCo director signing the relevant agreement.
The Voting and Support Agreements require, among other things, that each of the directors party thereto (in such directors’ capacity as shareholders only) (a) vote all of the shares of TriCo common stock owned by them: (i) in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and (ii) against alternative transactions or other proposals that could prevent or materially delay the Merger, (b) grant a corresponding proxy with respect to their shares under certain circumstances and (c) not, directly or indirectly, sell, assign, transfer or otherwise dispose of their shares of TriCo common stock, subject to certain exceptions.
Each of the Voting and Support Agreements will terminate at the earliest of (a) the Effective Time, (b) the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms, and (c) any amendment to the Merger Agreement without the prior written consent of the relevant director if such amendment diminishes the Merger Consideration, changes the form of Merger Consideration or extends the termination date of the Merger Agreement other than pursuant to any extension right expressly provided in the Merger Agreement.
Hawaii’s economy continues to remain resilient in an environment facing challenges, including from: high consumer prices and housing affordability, both of which are expected to continue with the gradual pass-through of tariffs and the ongoing conflict with Iran; a steady out-migration of its population; adverse weather events, such as the Kona Low storms,events alongside rising insurance costs; and slower economic growth with a 1.7%1.6% forecasted increase in the real gross domestic product for Hawaii in 2026 according to the State of Hawaii Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism (“DBEDT”) as compared to a 2.2% forecasted increase for the United States overall in 2026.2026 according to the Congressional Budget Office’s Budget and Economic Outlook. Recent geopolitical developments, including the conflicts in the Middle East, elevate uncertainty.
Despite these challenges, according to the State of Hawaii Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism,DBEDT, the statewide seasonally adjusted unemployment rate was 2.3%2.6% at FebruaryJune 28,30, 2026, which is lower than the national seasonally adjusted unemployment rate of 4.4%.4.2%.
Tourism also remains stable, with the average daily domestic passenger counts for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 sixfive percent higher than the average daily domestic passenger counts during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, according to the Hawaii Tourism Authority. Hawaii’s economy depends significantly on conditions of the U.S. economy and key international economies, particularly Japan, and the broader demand for travel of these key markets. International visitor arrivals have not yet recovered to pre-pandemic arrival levels and demand for tourism could be negatively impacted by increasing fuel prices.
The local Oahu housing market, particularly condominiums, continues to experience some softening as compared to previous years primarily due to continued high interest rates and prices. According to the Honolulu Board of Realtors, the volume of single-family home sales increased by 10.9%,3.9%, while condominium sales decreased by 3.6%,2.3%, in each case when comparing the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 with the same period in 2025. The median price of a single-family home sold on Oahu during the first threesix months of 2026 was $1,180,000, an increase of 2.6% compared to the same period in 2025. The median price of a condominium sold on Oahu during the first threesix months of 2026 was $510,000,$515,000, equivalentan increase of 1.5% compared to the median price during the same period in 2025. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, months of inventory of single-family homes and condominiums on Oahu were approximately 2.83.2 and 6.37.0 months, respectively, as compared to 3.33.7 and 6.27.0 months, respectively, as of MarchJune 31,30, 2025.
Net income was $67.8$73.4 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, an increase of $8.5$0.1 million or 14% as compared to the same period in 2025. Basic and diluted earnings per share waswere $0.55both $0.60 for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, an increase of $0.08$0.02 or 17% as compared to the same period in 2025. Diluted earnings per share was $0.55 for the three months ended March 31, 2026, an increase of $0.08 or 17%3% as compared to the same period in 2025. The slight increase in net income was primarily due to a $7.0$7.4 million increase in net interest income, a $5.5 million decrease in the provision for credit losses (the “Provision”)income and a $2.3$6.3 million increase in noninterest income. This was partially offset by a $4.3$7.0 million increase in the provision for income taxes, a $5.5 million increase in noninterest expense and a $2.0$1.1 million increase in the provision for incomecredit taxes.losses (the “Provision”).
Our return on average total assets was 1.14%1.23% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, anconsistent increase of 13 basis points fromwith the same period in 2025, and our return on average total stockholders’ equity was 9.86%10.52% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, ana increasedecrease of 7751 basis points forfrom the same period in 2025. Our return on average tangible assets was 1.19%1.28% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, anconsistent increase of 14 basis points fromwith the same period in 2025, and our return on average tangible stockholders’ equity was 15.33%16.34% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, ana increasedecrease of 74127 basis points from the same period in 2025. Our efficiency ratio was 57.77%56.17% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to 58.22%57.23% for the same period in 2025.
Our results for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 were highlighted by the following:
Net income was $141.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $8.7 million or 7% as compared to the same period in 2025. Basic earnings per share was $1.16 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $0.11 or 10% as compared to the same period in 2025. Diluted earnings per share was $1.15 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $0.10 or 10% as compared to the same period in 2025. The increase in net income was primarily due to a $14.4 million increase in net interest income, an $8.7 million increase in noninterest income and a $4.4 million decrease in the Provision. This was partially offset by a $9.8 million increase in noninterest expense and a $9.0 million increase in the provision for income taxes.
Our return on average total assets was 1.19% for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of seven basis points from the same period in 2025, and our return on average total stockholders’ equity was 10.19% for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of 12 basis points for the same period in 2025. Our return on average tangible assets was 1.24% for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of seven basis points from the same period in 2025, and our return on average tangible stockholders’ equity was 15.84% for the six months ended June 30, 2026, a decrease of 28 basis points from the same period in 2025. Our efficiency ratio was 56.95% for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to 57.71% for the same period in 2025.
Our results for the six months ended June 30, 2026 were highlighted by the following:
For the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we continued to maintain high levels of liquidity and adequate reserves for credit losses. We also remained well-capitalized. Common Equity Tier 1 (“CET1”) was 13.12%13.27% as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, aan decreaseincrease of 510 basis points from December 31, 2025. The decreaseincrease in CET1 was primarily due to commonearnings stockfor repurchasedthe andsix months ended June 30, 2026, partially offset by dividends declared and paid to the Company’s stockholdersstockholders, common stock repurchased and an increase in risk-weighted assets, partially offset by earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2026.assets.
For the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, average balances, related income and expenses, on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, and resulting yields and rates are presented in Table 3. An analysis of the change in net interest income, on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, is presented in Table 4.
Net interest income, on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, was $168.5$171.9 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, an increase of $6.7$7.5 million or 4%5% compared to the same period in 2025. Our net interest margin was 3.19%3.25% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, an increase of 1114 basis points from the same period in 2025. The increase in net interest income, on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, was primarily due to lower deposit funding and borrowing costs and higher average balances on our interest-bearing deposits in other banks,costs, partially offset by lower earning asset yields driven by lower yields in our loan and lease portfolio during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to the same period in 2025. Deposit funding costs were $62.1$61.2 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, a decrease of $9.6$9.1 million or 13% compared to the same period in 2025, primarily due to a decrease in interest rates. Rates paid on our interest-bearing deposits were 1.78%1.75% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, a decrease of 3834 basis points compared to the same period in 2025, primarily due to rate decreases. Total borrowing costs were nil for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, a decrease of $2.6$250.0 million compared to the same period in 2025.2025, as $250.0 million of FHLB advances matured during the third quarter of 2025. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, the average balance on our interest-bearing deposits in other banks was $1.5 billion, an increase of $283.9 million or 24% compared to the same period in 2025. The yield on our loan and lease portfolio was 5.29%5.30% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, a decrease of 1514 basis points as compared to the same period in 2025, primarily due to decreases in yields from our adjustable-rate commercial real estate,estate and commercial and industrial and construction loans, which are typically based on the SOFR.
For the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, average balances, related income and expenses, on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, and resulting yields and rates are presented in Table 5. An analysis of the change in net interest income, on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, is presented in Table 6.
Net interest income, on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, was $340.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $14.4 million or 4% compared to the same period in 2025. Our net interest margin was 3.22% for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of 12 basis points from the same period in 2025. The increase in net interest income, on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, was primarily due to lower deposit funding costs and lower borrowing costs, partially offset by lower earning asset yields driven by lower yields in our loan and lease portfolio during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025. Deposit funding costs were $123.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, a decrease of $18.7 million or 13% compared to the same period in 2025, primarily due to a decrease in interest rates. Rates paid on our interest-bearing deposits were 1.77% for the six months ended June 30, 2026, a decrease of 36 basis points compared to the same period in 2025, primarily due to rate decreases. Total borrowing costs were nil for the six months ended June 30, 2026, a decrease of $250.0 million compared to the same period in 2025, as $250.0 million of FHLB advances matured during the third quarter of 2025. The yield on our loan and lease portfolio was 5.29% for the six months ended June 30, 2026, a decrease of 15 basis points as compared to the same period in 2025, primarily due to decreases in yields from our adjustable-rate commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans, which are typically based on the SOFR.
The Federal Reserve influences the general market rates of interest, including the deposit and loan rates offered by many financial institutions. Our loan portfolio is affected by changes in the prime interest rate. The prime rate decreased by75by 75 basis points in 2025 to end the year at 6.75%, where it remained as at the end of the firstsecond quarter of 2026. As noted above, our loan portfolio is also impacted by changes in the SOFR. At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the one-month and three-month CME Term SOFR interest rates were 3.66%3.65% and 3.68%,3.73%, respectively. At MarchJune 31,30, 2025, the one-month and three-month CME Term SOFR interest rates were 4.32% and 4.29%, respectively. The target range for the federal funds rate, which is the cost of immediately available overnight funds, decreased 75 basis points in 2025 to end the year at 3.50% to 3.75%, where it remainsremained as at MarchJune 31,30, 2026. There continues to be uncertainty in the changing market and economic conditions.
The Provision was $5.0$5.6 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, an increase of $1.1 million or 24% compared to the same period in 2025. The increase was primarily due to increases in the provision for consumer loans, construction loans and commercial real estate loans and the provision for unfunded construction commitments. This was partially offset by decreases in the provision for commercial and industrial loans and residential mortgage loans. We recorded net charge-offs of loans and leases of $4.1 million and $3.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. This represented net charge-offs of 0.11% and 0.09% of average loans and leases, on an annualized basis, for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The Provision was $10.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, a decrease of $5.5$4.4 million or 52%29% compared to the same period in 2025. The decrease was primarily due to decreases in the provision for commercial and industrial loans, consumer loans, construction loans and home equity lines and lease financing and the provision for unfunded commercialhome andequity industrial and commercial real estateline commitments. This was partially offset by increases in the provision for residential mortgage loans, commercial andreal industrialestate loans and commercialresidential real estatemortgage loans and the provision for unfunded construction commitments. We recorded net charge-offs of loans and leases of $4.9$9.0 million and $3.8$7.1 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. This represented net charge-offs of 0.14%0.13% and 0.11%0.10% of average loans and leases, on an annualized basis, for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The ACL was $169.3$168.1 million as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, ana increasedecrease of $0.9$0.4 million or 1% from December 31, 2025 and represented 1.17%1.15% of total outstanding loans and leases as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to 1.18% of total outstanding loans and leases as of December 31, 2025. The reserve for unfunded commitments was $34.9$37.7 million as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $35.7 million as of December 31, 2025. The Provision is recorded to maintain the ACL and the reserve for unfunded commitments at levels deemed adequate by management based on the factors noted in the “Risk Governance and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk — Credit Risk” section of this MD&A.
Table 57 presents the major components of noninterest income for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 and Table 8 presents the major components of noninterest income for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025:
n/m – Denotes a variance that is not a meaningful metric to inform the change in noninterest income for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 to the same period in 2025.
Total noninterest income was $52.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, an increase of $2.3 million or 5% as compared to the same period in 2025.
Service charges on deposit accounts were $8.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, an increase of $0.6 million or 8% as compared to the same period in 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $0.5 million increase in overdraft and checking account fees.
Credit and debit card fees were $15.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, an increase of $0.6 million or 4% as compared to the same period in 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $0.6 million increase in interchange settlement fees, a $0.4 million decrease in network association dues and a $0.3 million increase in merchant service revenues, partially offset by a $0.7 million decrease in ATM interchange and surcharge fees.
Other service charges and fees were $13.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, an increase of $1.6 million or 13% as compared to the same period in 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $1.7 million increase in fees from annuities and securities.
Trust and investment services income was $9.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, a decrease of $0.2 million or 2% as compared to the same period in 2025.
BOLI income was $4.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, a decrease of $0.3 million or 6% as compared to the same period in 2025.
Othern/m – Denotes a variance that is not a meaningful metric to inform the change in noninterest income was $2.6 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, a minimal change as compared2026 to the same period in 2025.
Total noninterest income was $60.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $6.3 million or 12% as compared to the same period in 2025. Total noninterest income was $113.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $8.7 million or 8% as compared to the same period in 2025.
Service charges on deposit accounts were $8.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $0.5 million or 6% as compared to the same period in 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $0.6 million increase in overdraft and checking account fees. Service charges on deposit accounts were $16.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $1.1 million or 7% as compared to the same period in 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $1.1 million increase in overdraft and checking account fees.
Credit and debit card fees were $15.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, a decrease of $0.5 million or 3% as compared to the same period in 2025. This decrease was primarily due to a $0.2 million increase in network association dues and $0.1 million decrease in merchant services revenues. Credit and debit card fees were $30.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $0.1 million as compared to the same period in 2025.
Other service charges and fees were $14.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $1.1 million or 8% as compared to the same period in 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $1.2 million increase in fees from annuities and securities. Other service charges and fees were $28.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $2.7 million or 10% as compared to the same period in 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $2.9 million increase in fees from annuities and securities, partially offset by a $0.4 million decrease in online banking fees.
Trust and investment services income was $9.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, a decrease of $0.1 million or 1% as compared to the same period in 2025. Trust and investment services income was $18.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, a decrease of $0.3 million or 2% as compared to the same period in 2025.
BOLI income was $7.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $2.3 million or 50% as compared to the same period in 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $2.3 million increase in BOLI earnings. BOLI income was $11.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $2.1 million or 23% as compared to the same period in 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $1.4 million increase in BOLI earnings and a $0.7 million increase in death benefit proceeds from life insurance policies.
Other noninterest income was $6.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $3.0 million as compared to the same period in 2025. This increase was primarily due to $1.6 million in excise tax refunds received during the three months ended June 30, 2026, a $1.0 million increase in customer-related interest rate swap fees and a $0.8 million class action settlement the Company received during the three months ended June 30, 2026, partially offset by a $0.4 million decrease in insurance proceeds received. Other noninterest income was $8.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $3.1 million or 56% as compared to the same period in 2025. This increase was primarily due to $1.7 million in excise tax refunds received during the six months ended June 30, 2026, a $0.8 million class action settlement the Company received during the six months ended June 30, 2026, a $0.6 million increase in volume-based incentives and a $0.5 million increase in customer-related interest rate swap fees, partially offset by a $0.4 million decrease in insurance proceeds received.
Table 69 presents the major components of noninterest expense for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 and Table 10 presents the major components of noninterest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025:
Total noninterest expense was $127.9$130.4 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, an increase of $4.3$5.5 million or 4% as compared to the same period in 2025. Total noninterest expense was $258.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $9.8 million or 4% as compared to the same period in 2025.
Salaries and employee benefits expense was $62.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $2.9 million or 5% as compared to the same period in 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $1.5 million increase in base salaries and related payroll taxes, a $1.2 million increase in incentive compensation, a $0.6 million increase in group health plan costs and a $0.3 million increase in adjustments made to the deferred compensation plan as a result of market conditions. This was partially offset by a $0.9 million increase in payroll and benefit costs being deferred as loan origination costs. Salaries and employee benefits expense was $126.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $6.9 million or 6% as compared to the same period in 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $3.4 million increase in base salaries and related payroll taxes, a $2.6 million increase in incentive compensation, a $1.1 million increase in group health plan costs, a $0.4 million increase in mortgage banking commissions expense and a $0.3 million increase in adjustments made to the deferred compensation plan as a result of market conditions. This was partially offset by a $1.1 million increase in payroll and benefit costs being deferred as loan origination costs.
Salaries and employee benefits expense was $64.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, an increase of $4.0 million or 7% as compared to the same period in 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $1.9 million increase in base salaries and related payroll taxes, a $1.4 million increase in incentive compensation and a $0.5 million increase in group health plan costs.
Contracted services and professional fees were $14.0$18.4 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, aan decreaseincrease of $0.9$2.4 million or 6%15% as compared to the same period in 2025. This decreaseincrease was primarily due to a $1.0$4.2 million increase in audit, legal and consultant fees, partially offset by a $1.7 million decrease in outside services, primarily attributable to technology-related projects, marketing and new customer services. Contracted services and professional fees were $32.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $1.5 million or 5% as compared to the same period in 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $4.3 million increase in audit, legal and consultant fees, partially offset by a $2.7 million decrease in outside services, primarily attributable to technology-related projects, marketing and new customer services.
Occupancy expense was $7.8$7.9 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, a decreaseminimal of $0.3 million or 4%change as compared to the same period in 2025. Occupancy expense was $15.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, a decrease of $0.3 million or 2% as compared to the same period in 2025.
Equipment expense was $14.8$14.6 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, an increase of $0.9$0.5 million or 7%4% as compared to the same period in 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $0.5$0.3 million increase in technology-related amortization and licensing and maintenance fees and a $0.2 million increase in furniture and equipment depreciation. Equipment expense was $29.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $1.4 million or 5% as compared to the same period in 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $0.8 million increase in furniture and equipment depreciation and a $0.4$0.7 million increase in technology-related amortization and licensing and maintenance fees.
Regulatory assessment and fees were $3.2$3.4 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, a decrease of $0.6$0.3 million or 15%9% as compared to the same period in 2025. Regulatory assessment and fees were $6.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, a decrease of $0.9 million or 12% as compared to the same period in 2025. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the FDIC insurance assessment. During 2023, the FDIC approved a final rule for a special assessment to replenish the deposit insurance fund following bank failures occurring earlier in the year. As a result, the Company previously recorded a related loss of $16.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2023. During the first quarter of 2024, the FDIC issued a notice that the original loss estimate related to the 2023 bank failures was subsequently increased and that this increase would result in an additional assessment expense to affected institutions. As a result, we recorded a net expense related to the additional special assessment of $3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. In December 2025, the FDIC reduced the rate at which the assessment is collected for the eighth quarter of the collection period, with an invoice payment date of March 30, 2026, from 3.36 basis points to 2.97 basis points. We recorded a reduction in the expense related to the additional special assessment of $2.6 million in 2025 and $0.2 million in the first quarter of 2026.
Advertising and marketing expense was $2.3$2.2 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, an increase of $0.1 million or 3%7% as compared to the same period in 2025. Advertising and marketing expense was $4.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $0.2 million or 5% as compared to the same period in 2025.
Card rewards program expense was $8.4 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, a minimal change as compared to the same period in 2025. Card rewards program expense was $16.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $0.5 million or 6%3% as compared to the same period in 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $0.4$0.3 million increase in interchange fees paid to our credit card partnerscash reward redemptions and a $0.2 million increase in priority rewards card redemptions.
Other noninterest expense was $13.3$13.2 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, a decrease of $0.1 million as compared to the same period in 2025. Other noninterest expense was $26.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $0.6$0.5 million or 5%2% as compared to the same period in 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $0.7$0.8 million increase in charitable contributions andcontributions, a $0.2$0.3 million increase in postage expenses, a $0.3 million increase in brokers fees,fees and a $0.3 million increase in operational losses and other charge-offs, partially offset by a $1.0 million decrease in software amortization expense and a $0.3 million decrease in softwarepension-related amortization expense.expenses.
The provision for income taxes was $19.7$21.9 million (reflecting an effective tax rate of 22.50%22.95%) for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared with a provision for income taxes of $17.7$14.9 million (reflecting an effective tax rate of 23.00%16.86%) for the same period in 2025. The changeprovision infor theincome taxes was $41.5 million (an effective tax rate wasof partially22.73%) for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared with a provision for income taxes of $32.6 million (an effective tax rate of 19.72%) for the same period in 2025. The lower effective tax rates in 2025 were primarily due to anthe increaserevaluation of the California deferred tax assets due to the change in taxthe creditsCalifornia apportionment formula for the three months ended March 31, 2026.banks.
Our business segments are Retail Banking and Commercial Banking, with all other activities, including Treasury, reported in Corporate/Other. Table 711 summarizes net income (loss) from our business segments and Corporate/Other for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025. Additional information about operating segment performance and Corporate/Other is presented in “Note 16. Reportable Operating Segments” contained in our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2025, we realigned our internal organizational and management reporting structure. As a result of this change, we reduced our reportable operating segments from three to two. Our reportable segments are now Retail Banking and Commercial Banking. Activities previously reported within the Treasury and Other segment are now included in Corporate/Other, as Treasury exists to support our operating segments. The change in reportable segments reflects how our chief operating decision maker currently evaluates performance and allocates resources. In addition, during the third quarter of 2025, we made changes to the internal measurement of segment operating profits for the purpose of evaluating segment performance and resource allocation. The primary reason for the change was to align loan and deposit balances within the business segment that directly manages them. Specifically, certain loan and deposit balances previously included as part of the Retail Banking and Commercial Banking segments were reclassified among the segments and what is now Corporate/Other. The reallocation of select loan and deposit balances affected net interest income, net interest income after provision for credit losses, provision for income taxes, net income and segment earning assets. We have reported our selected financial information using the new loan and deposit balance alignments and using two reportable operating segments for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026. Prior-period segment information has been recast to conform to the current presentation.
Net income for the Retail Banking segment was $60.1$68.2 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, an increase of $2.6$2.8 million or 5%4% as compared to the same period in 2025. The increase in net income for the Retail Banking segment was primarily due to a $3.7$5.8 million increase in net interest income, a $2.2$1.4 million increase in noninterest income, a $1.0 million decrease in noninterest expense and a $0.9 million decrease in the Provision, and a $1.5 million increase in noninterest income, partially offset by a $3.4 million increase in noninterest expense and a $1.3$6.1 million increase in the provision for income taxes. The increase in net interest income was primarily due to higher deposit spreads and higher loan spreads. The increase in noninterest income was primarily due to increases in other service charges and fees and service charges on deposit accounts. The decrease in noninterest expense was primarily due to lower overall expenses that were allocated to the Retail Banking segment, partially offset by increases in occupancy expense and salaries and employee benefits expense. The decrease in the Provision allocated to the Retail Banking segment was primarily due to decreases in the provision for consumercommercial and industrial loans and residential mortgage loans, partially offset by increases in the provision for residentialconsumer loans.loans, Theconstructions increase in noninterest income was primarily due to an increase in other service chargesloans and fees.commercial Thereal increaseestate in noninterest expense was primarily due to an increase in salaries and employee benefits expense, an increase in occupancy expense and higher overall expenses that were allocated to the Retail Banking segment.loans. The increase in the provision for income taxes was primarily due to the increaseallocation of the revaluation of the California deferred tax assets in pretax income.2025.
Net income for the Retail Banking segment was $128.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $5.5 million or 4% as compared to the same period in 2025. The increase in net income for the Retail Banking segment was primarily due to a $9.4 million increase in net interest income, a $3.1 million decrease in the Provision and a $2.8 million increase in noninterest income, partially offset by a $7.4 million increase in the provision for income taxes and a $2.5 million increase in noninterest expense. The increase in net interest income was primarily due to higher deposit spreads and higher loan spreads. The decrease in the Provision allocated to the Retail Banking segment was primarily due to decreases in the provision for commercial and industrial loans, consumer loans and home equity lines, partially offset by increases in the provision for commercial real estate loans and residential mortgage loans. The increase in noninterest income was primarily due to increases in other service charges and fees and service charges on deposit accounts, partially offset by a decrease in trust and investment services income. The increase in the provision for income taxes was primarily due to the allocation of the revaluation of the California deferred tax assets in 2025, in addition to an increase in pretax income. The increase in noninterest expense was primarily due to increases in salaries and employee benefits expense and occupancy expense, partially offset by lower overall expenses that were allocated to the Retail Banking segment.
Net income for the Commercial Banking segment was $31.4$36.8 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, an increase of $0.6$3.8 million or 2%11% as compared to the same period in 2025. The increase in net income for the Commercial Banking segment was primarily due to a $2.0$2.5 million increase in net interest income, a $2.4 million increase in noninterest income, a $0.9 million decrease in noninterest expense and a $0.8 million decrease in the Provision, partially offset by a $0.8$2.8 million increase in noninterest income and a $0.2 million decrease in the provision for income taxes,taxes. partiallyThe offset by a $2.0 million decreaseincrease in net interest income was primarily due to higher average loan balances and ahigher $0.5loan millionfees. The increase in noninterest expense.income was primarily due to excise tax refunds received during the three months ended June 30, 2026 and an increase in customer-related interest rate swap fees. The decrease in noninterest expense was primarily due to higher overall credits that were allocated to the Commercial Banking segment. The decrease in the Provision allocated to the Commercial Banking segment was primarily due to decreases in the provision for consumercommercial and industrial loans and residential mortgage loans, partially offset by increases in the provision for residentialconsumer loans, construction loans and commercial real estate loans. The increase in noninterest income was primarily due to an increase in credit and debit card fees and an increase in service charges on deposit accounts. The decrease in the provision for income taxes was primarily due to anthe increaseallocation of the revaluation of the California deferred tax assets in tax credits. The decrease in net interest income was primarily due to lower deposit spreads and lower loan and lease spreads, partially offset by higher average deposit balances and higher average loan balances. The increase in noninterest expense was primarily due to higher card reward program expense and higher salaries and employee benefits expense, partially offset by higher overall credits that were allocated to the Commercial Banking segment.2025.
FHB insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-22 | Freas Tertia M. |
Grant/award | 2,613 | — | — |
| 2026-04-22 | Fujimoto Michael K |
Grant/award | 2,613 | — | — |
| 2026-04-22 | Moffatt Jim |
Grant/award | 2,613 | — | — |
| 2026-04-22 | Mugiishi Mark M |
Grant/award | 2,613 | — | — |
| 2026-04-22 | Thompson Kelly Ann |
Grant/award | 2,613 | — | — |
| 2026-04-22 | Washington Vanessa L |
Grant/award | 2,613 | — | — |
| 2026-04-22 | Wo Craig Scott |
Grant/award | 2,613 | — | — |
Well-known investors holding FHB (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 5,236,745 | $153.1M | 0.05% | Added 40% |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 2,143,166 | $62.8M | 0.05% | Added 27% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 1,606,236 | $47.1M | 0.03% | Added 1045% |
| D. E. Shaw & Co. | 2026-06-30 | 1,482,803 | $43.4M | 0.03% | Reduced 3% |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 591,673 | $17.3M | 0.01% | Added 464% |
| Bridgewater Associates | 2026-06-30 | 334,434 | $9.8M | 0.04% | Added 63% |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 202,400 | $5.9M | 0.01% | Reduced 19% |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 196,198 | $5.7M | 0.01% | New position |