FHI 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Federated Hermes, Inc. · NYSE · Investment Advice · CIK 1056288 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
Largest changes
see in full comparisonFederated HermesRecent anditsfuturedomesticlegislationofferings,by Congress, state legislatures, foreign parliaments, andanyothernon-U.S. offerings, to the extent distributed or marketed in the U.S., continue to be primarily regulated by the SEC. Federated Hermes,governments, andcertain Federated Hermes Funds, are also subject to regulationrulemaking bythe CFTC and the NFA due to their investment in futures, swaps or certain other commodity interests in more than de minimis amounts. In addition, during the past several years, regulators, self-regulatory organizations, or exchanges, such asthe SEC, FINRA, CFTC, NFA,NYSE andNYSE, state or local governments and regulators,havetheadopted,FCA, CBI, CIMA, Monetary Authority of Singapore, ASIC, CSSF, andcould adopt,otherregulatoryregulators,requirementsself-regulatory organizations or exchanges, have increased, andamendmentscanthatfurtherhave increasedincrease, Federated Hermes’ operatingexpensesexpenses, and affected the conduct of its offerings, as well asFederated Hermes’its AUM, revenues, and operatingincome, and can continue to do so.income. Federated Hermes’ offerings are affected by regulatory requirements and regulatory authorities that impact themanner in whichway Federated Hermes’ offerings are structured, marketed, distributed,delivered,delivered or sold. FederatedHermesHermes’ stewardship (engagement anditsproxyofferingsrecommendations) services are alsoare affectedimpacted bycertainsecurities laws, proxy‑advisor regulation, antitrust or competition laws, governance, environmental, and social‑related laws, and other regulatory requirements, as well as Congressional and other governmental inquiries, examinations, investigations, hearings, and enforcement. Regulatory requirementsgoverningapplicable to banks, other financial institutions, intermediaries, real estate and power generation can also affect Federated Hermes and its offerings, including changes to renewable energy grid connection, capacity allocation, and permitting regimes that can delay projects orrealreduceestate.their viability.
“Federated Hermes, and its business and offerings, engaged in, domiciled or offered outside of the U.S. are subject to foreign regulatory requirements, which are promulgated or amended from time to time by foreign regulatory or other authorities, such as the FCA for London-based operations, the CBI for Dublin-based operations, the CIMA for Cayman Island offerings, and the CSSF for Luxembourg offerings. …”see in full comparison
Potential Adverse Effects of Litigation, Investigations, Proceedings and Other Claims. Like other companies, Federatedsee in full comparisonHermes,Hermes and itsofferingsofferings,(such as the Federated Hermes Funds andFederated Hermes’its stewardshipbusiness),business, canbefacesubject to regulatoryone or more (including potentially parallel) regulatory, Congressional/governmentgovernmental examinations, inquiries, investigations, hearings, enforcement actions,litigationlitigation, and other claims and proceedings.Regarding examinations,Federated Hermes and its offeringsare subject toundergo routine, sweep and other examinations, inquiries, investigations, proceedings (administrative, regulatory, civil, or otherwise) and other claims by its regulators (regulatory claims). Federated Hermes and its offerings alsocan be subject to employee, former employee, customer, shareholder and other third-party,face complaints, proceedings (such as civil litigation) and other claims from employees, former employees, customers, shareholders, or other third parties (business-related claims). As Federated Hermes’ business and offerings grow (whetherorganically orthroughacquisition,organicgrowthexpansion,inacquisitions, rising AUM, or new offerings being distributed or marketed, or otherwise),the attention and resources devoted to compliance, and the possibility of noncompliance, can increase.TheComplianceattentiondemands andresourcesnoncompliancedevotedriskto compliance, and the possibility of noncompliance, as well as the threat of Congressional/government inquiries, investigations, hearings, or enforcement actions, or other litigation,can alsocanincrease as Federated Hermesusesand its offerings expand into new jurisdictions or markets, offer new investment offerings, and incorporate governance,environmental orenvironmental, social, sustainability,stewardshipstewardship, or other data inputs or investmenttechniques in providing its offerings, enters new countries, jurisdictions,techniques, ormarkets, and offers financial investment offerings,aswell as whenmarkets, customer requirements, support models and technologyincreasebecomeinmorecomplexity.complex. Federated Hermes has business-related claims asserted and threatened against it, and Federated Hermes and its offerings are subject to certain regulatory claims (such as routine and sweep examinations and other inquiries), in the ordinary course of business. In addition, Federated Hermes, and its offerings, can be subject to business-related claims, claims related to Federated Hermes sponsorship or management of, or inclusion of proprietary offerings in, its 401(k) plan or other benefit plans, and administrative, regulatory, or civil investigations and proceedings or other regulatory claims, outside of the ordinary course of business. For example, in August 2023, a class action lawsuit was filed, on behalf of the Federated Hermes, Inc. Employees Profit Sharing/401(Kk) Plan (Plan), in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (Western District) against Federated Hermes and certain other defendants alleging breach of their fiduciary duties of prudence and loyalty, and certain other causes of action, relating to administering the Plan. In March 2025, a former employee filed a lawsuit against Federated Hermes alleging discrimination. In July 2023, Federated Hermes, and a subsidiary, also filed suit in the Western District against its first two primary insurance carriers relating to Federated Hermes’ claims for coverage of certain losses incurred.
Impairment Risk. At December 31,see in full comparison2024,2025, Federated Hermes had approximately $1.2 billion of intangible assets includinggoodwill totaling approximately $1.1 billion,goodwill, the vast majority of whichrepresentsrepresent assets capitalized in connection with acquisitions and business combinations. Federated Hermes might not realize the value of these assets. Management performs a review of the carrying values of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets annually or when indicators of potential impairment exist and periodically reviews carrying values of other assets to determine whether events and circumstances indicate an impairment in value has occurred.AAssetvariety of factors could cause the carrying value of an asset to become impaired. For example, the value of an assetvalues can beimpactedimpairedif,by various factors including, amongotherothers,factors,reduced projectedfuture revenue streams are reduced due torevenues, lower managed assets, increasedprojectedexpenses, higher discount rates orotherchanges in interest rates.ShouldAnyaidentifiedreviewimpairmentindicatewouldimpairment,cause a write-down of the carrying value of theasset would occur,asset, resulting in a noncash charge which would adversely affect Federated Hermes’ results of operations and Financial Condition for the period.
Risk of Federated Hermes’ Money Market Offerings’ Ability to Maintain a Stable Net Asset Value. Approximatelysee in full comparison51%53% of Federated Hermes’ total 2025 revenuefor 2024was attributable to money market assets.An investment in moneyMoney marketfundsfundisinvestments are neither insured nor guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency. Federated Hermes’retail andretail, government/publicdebt money market funds, and itsdebt, private and collective money marketfunds,funds seek to maintain a stable or constantNAV.NAV,FederatedandHermes also offersits non-U.S.low volatilitylow-volatility NAV money market fundsthatseek to maintain a constant NAV, but will move to a four-digit NAV if such fund’s NAV falls outside of a 20-basis point collar. While stable or constant NAV money market funds seek to maintain a NAV of $1.00 per share, it is also possible to lose money by investing in these funds. Federated Hermes also offers institutional prime or municipal (or tax-exempt) money market funds which transact at a fluctuating NAV thatusesuse four-decimal-places ($1.0000), and a short-term variable NAV non-U.S. money market fund. It is also possible to lose money by investing in these funds. Federated Hermes devotes substantialresources,resourcessuch as significantto credit analysis, integration of proprietary insights from fundamental investmentanalysis,analysis (including governance, environmental or social factors and engagement interactions(for many of its investment offerings) andattention tosecurity valuation,in connection with the management ofmanaging its offerings. However, the NAV of an institutional prime or municipal (or tax-exempt) money market fund, or variable NAV fund or, if the above described conditions are met, a low-volatility NAV money market fund, can fluctuate, and there is no guarantee that a retail, government/publicdebtdebt,orprivateretailand collective (i.e., stable or constant NAV) money market fund will be able to preserve a stable or constant NAV in the future. Marketconditionsconditions,canliquidityleadconstraints,toprolongedaperiodslimitedof low interest rates or regulatory developments and requirements that limit supply of money marketsecuritiessecurities,andcreatesevere liquidity issues and/or declines in interest ratesilliquidity, oradditional prolonged periods of low yields in money market offerings, and regulatory developments and regulatory requirements can lead to shifts inshift asset levels andmix, whichmix canimpactadversely affect money market fundNAVsNAVs, asset levels and performance. If the NAV of a Federated Hermes stable or constant NAV money market fund were to decline to less than $1.00 per share, or if the fluctuating NAV of an institutional prime or municipal (or tax-exempt) money market fund, or variable NAV money market fund or low-volatility NAV money market fund consistently or significantly declines to less than $1.0000 per share, such Federated Hermes money market fund would likely experience significant redemptions, resulting in reductions in AUM, loss of shareholder confidence and reputational harm, all of which can cause material adverse effects on Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition.GivenUnder U.S. money market fund reforms, significant daily redemptionson any dayfromFederated Hermes’ registeredinstitutional prime or municipal (ortax-exempt) money market funds alsomaycanresult in the imposition oftrigger discretionary or mandatory redemption fees,whichpotentiallywould likely leadleading to furtherreductionsAUMin AUM,reductions, loss ofshareholderconfidence, andreputational harm, and can cause additionalmaterial adverse effects on Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition.
Potential Adverse Effects of Rising Interest Rates. Increases in interest rates cansee in full comparisonhaveadverselyan adverse effect onaffect Federated Hermes’ revenue from money market,fixed-income,fixed‑income, alternative/private markets and other investment offerings.TheEquityvaluesecurityof equity securitiesvalues (such asdividend-payingdividend‑paying equity securities) canrise and fallfluctuate in response tochanges in interest rates. In a rising short-terminterest rateenvironment,changes. In rising short‑term rate environments, certain investorsusingcan shift from money marketofferingsor othershort-durationshort‑durationfixed-incomefixed income offeringsfor cash management purposes can shift these investmentsto direct investments in comparable instrumentsin ordertorealizeseek higher yields.In addition, risingRising interest rateswillalso tend to reduce the fair value of securities held in various offerings. Rising interest rates canalso impactreduce the value of intangible or other assetsheld on Federated Hermes’ financial recordsandcontributeincreasetoimpairmentfinancial impairment.risk. Risinginterestrates can alsoimpactreduce demand for,andincrease the costto,offinance real estate,financing, andimpactadversely affect the valueof,and returnson,of, real estate and other alternative offerings.Among other potentialAdditional adverseeffects,effects of rising interest rates canresultinclude,inamongdecreasedothers, reduced liquidity, inflation and decreased affordability, changes in customer or shareholder preferences, highercostsborrowingfor borrowings andcosts, increased market volatility, andcan negatively impact thedecreased performance of Federated Hermes’ offerings and revenue.ManagementThecannottimingestimateandthe impactmagnitude ofrisingtheseinterest ratesimpacts (including, for example, on Federated Hermes’revenuerevenues),are uncertain butsuch impactcanhavemateriallyaadverselymaterial adverse effect onaffect Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (49)
As an investment manager, riskRisk is inherent to Federated Hermes’ investment management business and offerings. U.S.,Global UK,financial, EU and other global financial/securities, capital, commodities, currency, real estate, energy, credit and other markets (collectively, as applicable, markets), by their nature, are proneinherently to uncertaintyuncertain and subject participants to a variety of risks. If any of the following risks actually arise, Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition can be materially adversely affected. The risks described below are not theexhaustive, onlyand additional risks toincluding Federated Hermes’ business and offerings. Additional risksthose not presently known or that are currently considered immaterial can also adversely affect its Financial Condition.
Potential Adverse Effects of a Material Concentration in Revenue. At any point in time, a significant portion of Federated Hermes’ total AUM or revenue can be attributableconcentrated toin one or more of its investment offerings, or asset classes, or one or more customers with whom it has a relationship.customers. See Note (45) to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information on material concentrations in Federated Hermes’ revenue. A significant and prolonged decline in the AUM of anmaterially concentrated offering, strategy, or asset class with a material concentration can havematerially aadversely material adverse effect onaffect Federated Hermes’ future revenues and, to a lesser extent, net income, due to a related reduction in distribution expenses associated with these offeringsofferings, strategies and assets. Likewise,Similarly, significant negativeadverse changes in Federated Hermes’ relationshiprelationships with a customercustomers or shareholdershareholders with arepresenting material concentrationconcentrations can havematerially aadversely material adverse effect on Federated Hermes’affect future revenues and, to a lesser extent, net income due to a related reduction in distribution expenses associated with this customer or shareholder. A significant change in Federated Hermes’ business and offerings, or a significant reduction in AUM due to regulatory developments and new or amended regulatory requirements, market changes, such as significant and rapid increases or decreases in interest rates over a short period of time causing certain investors to prefer direct investments in interest-bearing securities, non-competitive performance, declines in asset values, the availability, supply and/or market interest in repurchase agreements and other investments, significant deterioration in investor confidence, continuing declining or prolonged periods of low short-term interest rates or negative interest rates or negative yields and resulting fee waivers, investor preferences for deposit products or other Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)-insured products, or certain exchange-traded offerings, index funds or other passive investment offerings, changes in offering fee structures, changes in relationships with customers, or other circumstances, or factors that change Federated Hermes’ business and offerings, reduce AUM or alter asset mix, can havematerially aadversely material adverse effect onaffect Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition.
Potential Adverse Effect of Providing Financial Support to Investment Offerings. Federated Hermes can, from time to time, elect to provide financial support to its sponsored investment offerings. Providing suchSuch support utilizesrequires the use of capital that would otherwise be available for other corporate purposes or to satisfy certainmeet applicable capital or liquidity adequacy requirements. LossesAny resultinglosses from such support, or failurean inability to have or devotetimely deploy sufficient capital to support offerings,capital, can havematerially aadversely material adverse effect onaffect Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition.
Risk of Federated Hermes’ Money Market Offerings’ Ability to Maintain a Stable Net Asset Value. Approximately 51%53% of Federated Hermes’ total 2025 revenue for 2024 was attributable to money market assets. An investment in moneyMoney market fundsfund isinvestments are neither insured nor guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency. Federated Hermes’ retail andretail, government/public debt money market funds, and itsdebt, private and collective money market funds,funds seek to maintain a stable or constant NAV.NAV, Federatedand Hermes also offersits non-U.S. low volatilitylow-volatility NAV money market funds that seek to maintain a constant NAV, but will move to a four-digit NAV if such fund’s NAV falls outside of a 20-basis point collar. While stable or constant NAV money market funds seek to maintain a NAV of $1.00 per share, it is also possible to lose money by investing in these funds. Federated Hermes also offers institutional prime or municipal (or tax-exempt) money market funds which transact at a fluctuating NAV that usesuse four-decimal-places ($1.0000), and a short-term variable NAV non-U.S. money market fund. It is also possible to lose money by investing in these funds. Federated Hermes devotes substantial resources,resources such as significantto credit analysis, integration of proprietary insights from fundamental investment analysis,analysis (including governance, environmental or social factors and engagement interactions (for many of its investment offerings) and attention to security valuation, in connection with the management ofmanaging its offerings. However, the NAV of an institutional prime or municipal (or tax-exempt) money market fund, or variable NAV fund or, if the above described conditions are met, a low-volatility NAV money market fund, can fluctuate, and there is no guarantee that a retail, government/public debtdebt, orprivate retailand collective (i.e., stable or constant NAV) money market fund will be able to preserve a stable or constant NAV in the future. Market conditionsconditions, canliquidity leadconstraints, toprolonged aperiods limitedof low interest rates or regulatory developments and requirements that limit supply of money market securitiessecurities, andcreate severe liquidity issues and/or declines in interest ratesilliquidity, or additional prolonged periods of low yields in money market offerings, and regulatory developments and regulatory requirements can lead to shifts inshift asset levels and mix, whichmix can impactadversely affect money market fund NAVsNAVs, asset levels and performance. If the NAV of a Federated Hermes stable or constant NAV money market fund were to decline to less than $1.00 per share, or if the fluctuating NAV of an institutional prime or municipal (or tax-exempt) money market fund, or variable NAV money market fund or low-volatility NAV money market fund consistently or significantly declines to less than $1.0000 per share, such Federated Hermes money market fund would likely experience significant redemptions, resulting in reductions in AUM, loss of shareholder confidence and reputational harm, all of which can cause material adverse effects on Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition. GivenUnder U.S. money market fund reforms, significant daily redemptions on any day from Federated Hermes’ registered institutional prime or municipal (or tax-exempt) money market funds also maycan result in the imposition oftrigger discretionary or mandatory redemption fees, whichpotentially would likely leadleading to further reductionsAUM in AUM,reductions, loss of shareholder confidence, and reputational harm, and can cause additional material adverse effects on Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition.
Potential Adverse Effects of Increased Competition in the Investment Management Business. The investment management business is highly competitive. Federated Hermes competes with other investment advisors, fund managers, broker‑dealers, banks, insurance companies and other institutions in the management and distribution of investment offerings, stewardship services, real estate development and renewal energy project services, many of which have substantially greater resources and brand recognition. Certain intermediaries also distribute proprietary or competitor offerings that can be prioritized over Federated Hermes’ offerings. Federated Hermes’ offerings also can compete against each other as new similar or “clone” offerings (such as exchange-traded funds with similar strategies as mutual fund offerings), or new exchange-traded share classes are added to mutual funds, which can result in redemptions from traditional mutual funds or share classes.
Potential Adverse Effects of Increased Competition in the Investment Management Business. The investment management business is highly competitive. Federated Hermes competes in the management and distribution of investment offerings (such as the Federated Hermes Funds and Separate Accounts), stewardship services and real estate development services with other fund management companies and investment advisors, foreign, national, and regional broker/dealers, commercial banks, insurance companies and other institutions. Many of these competitors have substantially greater resources and brand recognition than Federated Hermes. Competition is based on various factors, including, among others, business reputation, investment performance, quality of service, engagement, carbon neutrality and other governance, environmental or social-related commitments and initiatives, the strength and continuity of management and selling relationships, distribution services offered, technological innovation (e.g., the use of financial technology, tokenization, block chain, artificial intelligence, natural language processing, digital client engagement tools and data science), the ability to generate, validate and publish accurate reports in a timely manner, the ability to offer customers and shareholders 24/7 access to their funds, the type (e.g., passive-passively- versus actively-managed, fund versus FDIC-insured deposits, governance, environmental or social factor integrated versus non-governance, environmental or social factor integrated) and range of offerings made available, fees charged, customer or shareholder preferences, political or other views surrounding governance, environmental or social-related offerings or governance, environmental or social factor integration, transformation, and investing, and geopolitical developments. As with any highly competitive market, competitive pricing structures are important. If competitors charge lower fees for similar offerings, Federated Hermes has reduced, or can further reduce, the fees on its own offerings (either directly on a gross basis or on a net basis through fee waivers) for competitive purposes in order to retain or attract customers and shareholders. Increased competition also can require changes in Federated Hermes’ business strategy or model, offerings, operational strategies, governance, environmental or social strategies and human resource management strategies to respond to competition from existing and new market innovations and competitors, which can increase expenses, create risks that such changes will not be successfully implemented, and cause Federated Hermes to not achieve its long-term strategic objectives. Such fee reductions, business strategy changes, or other effects of competition, or failures to adequately adjust to meet competition, can have a material adverse effect on Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition.
Many of Federated Hermes’ offerings are designed for use by institutions such as banks, insurance companies and other corporations.institutional Ainvestors, which hold a large portion of Federated Hermes’ managedits assets, particularly in money market, fixed-incomefixed‑income and alternative/private marketsmarket assets,strategies. areChanges held by institutional investors. Ifin the structure or attractiveness of institutional investment offerings, such as money market funds, changes or becomes disfavored by institutions, whether due to regulatory ordevelopments, market changes,conditions, competing offerings (such as FDIC-insured deposit products or non-transparent, actively managed ETFs) or otherwise,other factors, can limit Federated HermesHermes’ could be unableability to retain or grow market share and this canmaterially adversely affect Federated Hermes’ profitability and have a material adverse effect on Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition. Certain ofofferings Federatedcan Hermes’also be impact-oriented or other governance, environmental or social offerings also can be impact oriented and not suitable investmentsunsuitable for certain fiduciary customers in the U.S. without obtaining appropriate consent. Certain customersconsent, or potential customers of Federated Hermes also can disfavor impact oriented or other governance, environmental or social offeringsdisfavored for political or other reasons.reasons, These factorswhich can limitconstrain Federatedasset Hermes’ ability to market or grow assetsgrowth and this can adversely affect Federated Hermes’ future profitability and affect, potentially in a material way, future profitability and Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition.
A significant portion of Federated Hermes’ revenue comesis derived from providing offerings and strategies to the financial intermediary market, comprising over 10,00011,000 institutions and intermediary customers worldwide. Federated Hermes’ future profitability willdepends beon adverselyretaining affectedand if it is unable to retain or grow itsgrowing market share and can be adversely affected by consolidations in the banking and securities industries,industry asconsolidation and regulatory developments and regulatory requirements impactimpacting customers and shareholders.
There can be no assurance that Federated Hermes’ growth is sustainable or that it can maintain its current size and scale, and competitive, market and other factors can result in reduced growth or contraction, adversely affecting, potentially in a material way, Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition.
Risks Related to the Development of New Offerings. Federated Hermes’ financial performance depends, in part, on its ability to successfully develop, market and manage new investment and related offerings. The developmentDeveloping and introducing new offerings requires sustained innovation and significant time, resources and ongoing support and investment. The introduction of new offerings requiresinvolves continued innovative efforts on Federated Hermes’ part and may require significant time and resources as well as ongoing support and investment. Substantialsubstantial risks and uncertainties are associated with the introduction of new offerings,uncertainties, including the implementation of new and appropriatecontrols, operational controlsreadiness, and procedures, shiftingchanging customer, shareholder and market preferences, thecompetitive introduction of competing offeringspressures and compliance with regulatory requirements.compliance. New offerings often must be in the marketplace forrequire three or more years in orderthe marketplace to generate theestablish track records requiredsufficient to attract significant AUMAUM. inflows.Customers, Increasingly, customersshareholders and intermediaries areincreasingly lookingseek to investment managers to delivertailored investment outcomes tailoredand value-added services beyond traditional offerings. Failure to particularinnovate, circumstancessuccessfully and needs, and to augment traditional investment offerings with additional value-added services. A failure to innovate and introduce successfullaunch new offerings or to effectively manage therelated risks related to such offerings can impact Federated Hermes’reduce market share and cause reductions in AUM, lossharm ofbusiness reputation and shareholder confidenceconfidence, and reputationalmaterially harm,adversely all of which can cause material adverse effects onaffect Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition.
Potential Adverse Effects of Changes in Federated Hermes’ Distribution Channels. Federated Hermes actsdistributes its investment offerings as a wholesaler ofthrough investmentfinancial offeringsintermediaries, to its customers, including, for example,including banks, broker/‑dealers, registered investment advisors and other financial planners.planners, Itand also sells investment offerings, and stewardship services andservices, real estate development services, and renewable energy project development services, including the origination and monetization of development-stage renewable projects, directly to corporations, institutions, government agencies and other customers. Revenues from certain development services can be linked to project activity and milestone-based payments, which can be difficult to forecast and can increase period-to-period revenue volatility. There can be no assurance that any offering diversification efforts (whether to Federated Hermes’ fund line-upofferings or geographically), governance, environmental or social positioningpositioning, or investments in technology, data and analytics to bolster Federated Hermes’support distribution efforts will be successful. There can also can be no assurance that Federated Hermes will continue to havemaintain access to anycurrent customercustomers or distribution channels, or that currentlymarket distributesconditions itswill offerings,support the sale or financing of development-stage projects on acceptable terms, that itscustomers relationshipwill withnot any onenarrow or morereduce the offerings they distribute, that such customersrelationships will continue over time or on existing economic termsterms, or that its sales orand distribution efforts will achievebe any particular level of success.successful. The impact of Voluntary Yield-related Fee Waivers,Waivers (if any), other waivers for competitive purposes and related reductions in distribution expense can vary depending upon, among other variables, changes in distribution models, changes in such customers’ distribution fee arrangements, changes in customer or shareholder relationships and changes in the extent to which the impact of the waivers is shared by one or more customers. TheDistribution cost of distributioncosts as a percentage of total fund revenue remainedincreased flatto at29% in 2025 compared to 28% in 2024 as compared to 2023.2024.
Potential Adverse Effects of Declines in the Amount of or Changes in the Mix of Assets under Management. A significant portion of Federated Hermes’ revenue is derived from investment advisory fees, which are typically based on the value of managed assets and vary with the type of asset being managed, with higher fees generally earned on multi-asset and equity investment offerings than on alternative/private market,markets, fixed income and money market offerings. Federated Hermes can also can earn performance fees or carried interest on certain offerings and types of assets. Mutual fund and other fund offerings generally havegenerate higher advisory fees than Separate Accounts.Accounts, Additionally, certainand components of distribution expense can vary depending upon theby asset class, distribution channel and/or the size or structure of the customer or shareholder relationship. Consequently,Accordingly, significant fluctuationschanges in the number of shareholderscustomer or customersshareholder ofactivity, Federated Hermes’ offerings, the value of securitiessecurity or other investmentsasset held by, orvalues, the level of subscriptions to or redemptions from, the offerings advised by its advisory subsidiaries andredemptions, overall asset mix among offerings, can materially affect AUM and thus Federated Hermes’ revenue, profitability and growth. Similarly, changes in Federated Hermes’ average asset mix across offerings or asset types havecan amaterially directaffect impactAUM onand Federated Hermes’ revenuerevenue, profitability and profitability.growth. Federated Hermes generally pays out a larger portion of the revenue earned from managed assets in money marketmarket, multi-asset, and multi-assetfixed-income fund offeringsfunds than the revenue earned from managed assets in equity, fixed-incomeequity and alternative/private markets fund offerings.funds. A significant portion of Federated Hermes’ managed assets is held in investment offerings that permit investors to redeemredemptions or withdraw their investmentwithdrawals at any time. Capacity constraints, where the size of AUM in a particular offering or asset class make it more difficult to trade efficiently in the market,trade, can result inrequire certain offerings or asset classes beingto be partially or fully closed to new investments, whichpotentially can resultresulting in redemptions or a reallocation of assets to other offerings or asset classes.reallocation. Changing market conditions, regulatory developments and regulatory requirements, among other factors, can cause a shift in Federated Hermes’ asset mix among different types of offerings or asset classes, such as towards money market and fixed-income offerings. Regulatory developments and regulatory requirements also can cause a shift between different types of offerings or asset classes, such as toward orofferings, between money market offerings or from money market offerings to other offerings. Each of the abovethese factors can cause a decline in or otherwise affect, potentially in a material way, Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition.
Impairment Risk. At December 31, 2024,2025, Federated Hermes had approximately $1.2 billion of intangible assets including goodwill totaling approximately $1.1 billion,goodwill, the vast majority of which representsrepresent assets capitalized in connection with acquisitions and business combinations. Federated Hermes might not realize the value of these assets. Management performs a review of the carrying values of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets annually or when indicators of potential impairment exist and periodically reviews carrying values of other assets to determine whether events and circumstances indicate an impairment in value has occurred. AAsset variety of factors could cause the carrying value of an asset to become impaired. For example, the value of an assetvalues can be impactedimpaired if,by various factors including, among otherothers, factors,reduced projected future revenue streams are reduced due torevenues, lower managed assets, increased projected expenses, higher discount rates or other changes in interest rates. ShouldAny aidentified reviewimpairment indicatewould impairment,cause a write-down of the carrying value of the asset would occur,asset, resulting in a noncash charge which would adversely affect Federated Hermes’ results of operations and Financial Condition for the period.
Potential Adverse Effects of Termination or Failure to Renew Advisory Agreements. A substantial majority of Federated Hermes’ revenue is derived from investment advisory agreements with Federated Hermes Funds (and to a lesser extent, sub-advised mutual funds) registered under the 1940 Act that are terminable upon 60 days’ notice. InThese addition, each such investment advisory agreementagreements must be approved and renewed annually by each mutual fund’s board of directors or trustees,board, including independent members of the board of directors or trustees, or itsby shareholders, as required by law. Failure to renew, changes resulting in lower fees under, or termination of, certainor orfee reductions under a significant number of,of these agreements can havematerially aadversely material adverse impact onaffect Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition. As required byUnder the 1940 Act, each mutual fund investment advisory agreement with a mutual fund automatically terminates upon its assignment, although a new investment advisory agreementsagreement can be approved by the mutual fund’s directors or trusteesboard and, asif required by law, its shareholders. A sale or other transfer of a sufficient number of shares of Federated Hermes’ voting securities to transfer control of Federated Hermes can be deemed an assignment in certain circumstances. An assignment, actual or constructive, will trigger these termination provisions and can adversely affect Federated Hermes’ ability to realize the value of these agreements.
Federated Hermes’ investmentInvestment advisory agreements for Separate Accounts that are not investment companies subject to the 1940 Act are generally terminable uponon notice to Federated Hermes (or, in certain cases, after a 30-day, 60-day or other notice period). Asand, as required by the Advisers Act, investmentrequire advisorycustomer agreementsconsent for Separateassignment. Accounts also provide that consent is required from customers before the agreements can be assigned. The failureFailure to obtain required customer consents for an assignment, actual or constructive,constructive assignment can adversely affect Federated Hermes’ ability to realize the value of these agreements. Regarding the investment advisory agreements with non-U.S. registered or unregistered Federated Hermes Funds, shareholder notice or consent can be required if, after an investment advisory agreement is entered into, there are changes to fees. Such investment advisory agreements are generally terminable for any reason, without cause, after a 30-day to 90-day (or other) notice period. Customer consent to amend investment advisory agreements for non-U.S. Separate Accounts can be required for amendments to such agreements, and such agreements also are generally terminable for any reason, without cause, after a 30-day to 90-day (or other) notice period. The terms of investment advisory agreements, including consent or director or trustee, shareholder or other notice or approval requirements for amending, renewing, or terminating them, can be negotiated and vary among types of Federated Hermes Funds and Separate Accounts. The termination of, orTermination, failure to renew,renew or reductionfee inreductions fees under, anunder investment advisory agreementagreements, will reduce Federated Hermes’ revenue and the termination of, or failure to renew, or reduction in fees under, an investment advisory agreementparticularly with a significant customer,customers or investment advisory agreements with a series of customers, would reduce revenue and can negativelyadversely effect,affect, potentially in a material way, Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition.
Potential Adverse Effects of Rising Interest Rates. Increases in interest rates can haveadversely an adverse effect onaffect Federated Hermes’ revenue from money market, fixed-income,fixed‑income, alternative/private markets and other investment offerings. TheEquity valuesecurity of equity securitiesvalues (such as dividend-payingdividend‑paying equity securities) can rise and fallfluctuate in response to changes in interest rates. In a rising short-term interest rate environment,changes. In rising short‑term rate environments, certain investors usingcan shift from money market offerings or other short-durationshort‑duration fixed-incomefixed income offerings for cash management purposes can shift these investments to direct investments in comparable instruments in order to realizeseek higher yields. In addition, risingRising interest rates willalso tend to reduce the fair value of securities held in various offerings. Rising interest rates can also impactreduce the value of intangible or other assets held on Federated Hermes’ financial records and contributeincrease toimpairment financial impairment.risk. Rising interest rates can also impactreduce demand for, andincrease the cost to,of finance real estate,financing, and impactadversely affect the value of, and returns on,of, real estate and other alternative offerings. Among other potentialAdditional adverse effects,effects of rising interest rates can resultinclude, inamong decreasedothers, reduced liquidity, inflation and decreased affordability, changes in customer or shareholder preferences, higher costsborrowing for borrowings andcosts, increased market volatility, and can negatively impact thedecreased performance of Federated Hermes’ offerings and revenue. ManagementThe cannottiming estimateand the impactmagnitude of risingthese interest ratesimpacts (including, for example, on Federated Hermes’ revenuerevenues), are uncertain but such impact can havematerially aadversely material adverse effect onaffect Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition.
Potential Adverse Effects of Low Short-Term Interest Rates. In March 2020, in response to disrupted economic activity as a result of the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic, the FOMC decreased the federal funds target rate range to 0% - 0.25%. The federal funds target rate drives short-term interest rates. AsIn a resultnear-zero ofor the near-zeronegative interest-rate environment, the gross yieldyields earned byon certain money market funds wascan notbe sufficientinsufficient to cover all of the fund’s operating expenses.expenses, Beginningresulting in the first quarter 2020, Federated Hermes began to incurincurring Voluntary Yield-related Fee Waivers.Waivers, Thesewhich waiverscan werebe partially offset by related reductions in distribution expense as a result of Federated Hermes’ mutual understanding and agreement with third-party intermediary customers to share the impact of the Voluntary Yield-related Fee Waivers. InFollowing responsemultiple toincreases globalin economic activity2022 and elevated2023 inflationand levels,subsequent thereductions FOMCin raised2024 and 2025, the federal funds target rate multiple times in 2022 and 2023, partially offset by reductions to the federal funds target rate in 2024. The range was 4.25%3.50 - 4.50%3.75% as of December 31, 2024,2025, and remained in that range as of January 29,28, 2025, the FOMC continued the range at that level. The rate increases in 2022 and 2023 eliminated the net negative pre-tax impact of the Voluntary Yield-related Fee Waivers by the second half of 2022.2026. See Item 1A – Risk Factors – Specific Risk Factors – Risks Related to Federated Hermes’ Investment Management Business and Offerings – Potential Adverse Effects of Increased Competition in the Investment Management Business for information on competitive waivers currently being implemented by Federated Hermes, other than the Voluntary Yield-related Fee Waivers.
Voluntary Yield-related Fee Waivers are calculated as a percentage of AUM in certain money market funds and thus can vary dependingbased uponon the asset levels and mix in such funds.mix. While the level of fee waivers is impacted by various factors, as an isolated variable, increases in short-term interest rates that result in higher yields on securities purchased in money market funds would likely reduce the negative pre-tax impact of these waivers. Conversely, as an isolated variable, decreases in short-term interest rates that result in lower or negative yields on securities purchased in money market funds generally would result in an increase in these fee waivers for certain money market funds and the negative pre-tax impact of these waivers. In that case, Federated Hermes can be required to implement structural changes to certain money market funds and incur additional expenses associated with implementing such changes. Any increases in yields due to increases in interest rates and resulting decreases in fee waivers, or any decreases in yields due to decreases in interest rates and resulting increases in fee waivers, would be uncertain and not directly proportional. The level and actual amount of fee waivers, and the resulting negative impact of these fee waivers, are contingent on a number of variables, such as changes in assets within the money market funds, changes in yields available for purchase by such funds, changes to the level of government stimulus programs (if any), which can result in the issuance of additional Treasury debt instruments, actions by the FOMC,Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), the USDT, the SEC, the FSOC and other governmental entities, changes in expenses of the money market funds, changes in the mix of money market assets, changes in customer or shareholder relationships, changes in money market offerings structures, demand for competing investment offerings, changes in the distribution fee arrangements with third parties, Federated Hermes’ willingness to implement, or, when applicable, continue, Voluntary Yield-related Fee Waivers and changes in the extent to which the impact of the waivers is shared by third parties. In any period, a combination of variables can impact the amount of Voluntary Yield-related Fee Waivers, if any, and the actual amount and resulting negative impact of future fee waivers, if any, can vary significantly from period to period.
Federated Hermes did not incur Voluntary Yield-related Fee Waivers for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 or 2023. TheHowever, the duration, level and impact of anfuture interest ‑rate declinedeclines or future Voluntary Yield-related Fee Waivers can havematerially aadversely material adverse effect onaffect Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition.
Potential Adverse Effects of Poor Investment Performance. Success in the investment management business isdepends largely dependent on the investment performance of Federated HermesHermes’ Funds, Separate Accounts, orand other investment offerings relative to market conditions and competing offerings. Investment performance also depends on the quality of investmentsecurity selection, proper valuation of investments,valuation, liquidity management,management and the performance of theunderlying portfolio companiesinvestments. and other investments in which Federated Hermes’, shareholders’ and customers’ assets are invested. The valueValue and performance of theFederated Hermes’ offerings, and underlying portfolio companiesinvestments, in which Federated Hermes’, shareholders’ and customers’ assets are investedcan also can be adversely impacted, potentially in a material way, by climate, social, environmental, governancegovernance, benchmark, index and geopolitical changes, oras well as associated pricing, operational, implementation and other factors,risks. which, in turn, can adversely impact Federated Hermes’ and its offerings’ performance. GoodStrong performance generally assistssupports AUM retention and growth of AUM,growth, resulting in additional revenues.revenues, Goodincluding, performanceamong canother also result inrevenue, performance fees or carried interestinterest, being earned on certain offerings. Conversely,while poor performance,performance or the failure to meet thestated investment objectives and policies of offerings,offerings tends to have the opposite effect. There can be no guarantee that any offering, or underlying investment, will be successful or have good performance. An offering being, or becoming, an unsuitable offering for a customer or shareholder, whether due to changes in investment objectives or otherwise, also tends to result in decreased sales and increased redemptions, and failure to earn performance fees, carried interest and/or other fees. For certain offerings, failure to integrate and apply acceptable governance, environmental or social standards, carbon neutrality or climate change strategies, or sustainability or responsible investment principles, can be considered in determining, or result in, poor performance, and result in decreased sales and increased redemptions, and failure to earn performance fees, carried interest and/or other fees. The failure to earn performance fees, carried interest and/or other fees results in a corresponding decrease in revenues to Federated Hermes. Poor performance can, therefore, have a material adverse effect on Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition. Market conditions, such as volatility, illiquidity and rising or falling interest rates, among others, can adversely affect the performance of certain quantitative or other offerings, asset classes or sectors. Limitations imposed by certain customers, trade agreementsagreements, tariffs and government-imposed restrictions, such as those on investments in certain countries or companies, can limit investment opportunities and negatively affect performance. Performance can also can be adversely affected by inferior security selection, human error, government or issuer financial constraints, climate change that impacts portfolio company performance, pandemics or other unexpected events, and other factors. The effects of poor performance on Federated Hermes can be magnified where assets, customers or shareholders are concentrated in certain offerings, asset classes or sectors. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates and poor performance of investments made by Federated Hermes, or derivatives (including, for example, hedges or forward contracts) or other financial transactions entered into by Federated Hermes, can result in investment or capital losses and materially adversely affect Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition. The failure or poor performance of competitors’ offerings, which can be like those offered by Federated Hermes, can undermine investor confidence in those offering types, regardless of Federated Hermes’ own performance.
Risk Related to Federated Hermes’ Common Stock and Corporate Structure
Common Stock and Status as a Controlled Company. Federated Hermes has two classes of common stock: Class A, which has voting power; and Class B, which is non-voting except in certain limited circumstances. All of the outstanding shares of Class A common stock are held by the Voting Shares Irrevocable Trust for the benefit of certain members of the Donahue family. The three trustees of this trust are Federated Hermes’ President and CEO and Chairman of the board of directors, J. Christopher Donahue, his brother, Thomas R. Donahue, Federated Hermes’ Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer and a director, and Ann C. Donahue, the wife of J. Christopher Donahue. Accordingly, Federated Hermes qualifies as a “controlled company” under Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. As a controlled company, Federated Hermes qualifies for and relies upon exemptions from several NYSE corporate governance requirements, including requirements that: (1) a majority of the board of directors consists of independent directors; and (2) the entity maintains a nominating/corporate governance committee that is composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities. As a result, while Federated Hermes’ board of directors maycan from time to time have a majority of independent directors, Federated Hermes’ board of directors is not required to have (and, as of December 31, 2024,2025, did not have) a majority of independent directors. It also does not maintain a nominating/corporate governance committee. Federated Hermes is also exempt as a “controlled company” from certain additional independence requirements and responsibilities regarding compensation advisors applicable to Compensation Committee members. The Class A common stock and Class B common stock of Federated Hermes have equal rights to dividends and distributions, when declared, whether in cash or stock, and receive the same amount of consideration per share, notwithstanding any differences in voting rights, in the event of a purchase of Federated Hermes by another entity by means of any transaction or series of related transactions (including, without limitation, any reorganization, merger, consolidation or stock purchase) or a sale of all or substantially all of the assets of Federated Hermes. There can be no assurance that Federated Hermes will generate sufficient earnings and cash flow to pay dividends or distributions at current levels or at all. Any reduction or elimination of dividends can adversely affect the market price of Federated Hermes’ Class B common stock. While Federated Hermes believes its dual-class structure is appropriate and benefits its shareholders, and should be a factor taken into account by shareholders when investing in Federated Hermes, as a company with a dual-class structure, Federated Hermes can be excluded from certain financial indexes, which can result in decreased investments in its Class B common stock and adversely affect its stock price. The sale or issuance of substantial amounts of Federated Hermes’ Class B common stock in the public market also can adversely affect its price. If existing shareholders sell substantial amounts of Class B common stock, or if there is a perception that such sales will occur, the market price of Federated Hermes Class B common stock can decline as a result.
Potential Adverse Effects of a Decline or Disruption in the Economy or Markets. Economic or market downturns, deficits, disruptions,disruptions or other conditions (domestic or international) conditions can causeresult in volatility, illiquidity and other potentialadverse market effects, including, among other potentially material adverse effectsimpacts, inreduced the markets. Such conditions also can adversely affect, potentially in a material way, theinvestment supply of investments, (such as money market or municipal (tax-exempt) securities), diminished profitability, and the profitabilityperformance, and performance of, demand for,for and investor confidence inin, investment offerings. Such economic or market downturns, deficits, disruptions or otherThese conditions can include, foramong example,others, disruptionsmarket indisruptions, the markets,sector defaults or poor performance in certain sectors of the economy,underperformance, changes in the levels of consumer spending and personal savings, unemployment, excessive or unsustainable corporateprivate, public, corporate, or emerging market debt levels, increased personal, business or government/municipality bankruptcies, supply ‑chain disruptions, theshifts commencement,in continuationfiscal or endingmonetary ofpolicy governmentor policiesreform and(such reforms,as stimulus programs and other market-related actions,programs, quantitative easing or tightening,tightening) or other changesmarket-related in monetary policy,activities), central bank changes in risk perception or activism through continued, high/rising deficits, market wariness, increased or decreased ownership, exchange, cancellation or issuance of debt or other means, increased regulation or the pace of new regulation or deregulation, changes in interest rates, changes in oil prices or other changes in commodity markets or prices, changes in currency values, changes in property values and financial costs, or exchange rates or currency abandonment, inflation, deflation, or stagflation, index changes, widening bid/ask spreads, changes in the allocation of capital to market-making, restructuring of government-sponsored entities, imposition of economic sanctions or government-imposed investment restrictions, trade friction or trade wars and increased trade tariffs, economic or political weakness, political turmoil, changes in political views on governance, environmental or social-related matters, geopolitical tensions (such as between the U.S. and Russia, China, Iran andIran, North Korea and Venezuela) or military escalation (such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine or the Israel-Hamas war) or other instability in certain countries or regions, technology-related or cyber-attacks or incidents, terrorism, climate change, the prospects for or concerns about any of the foregoing factors or events, or other factors or events that affect the markets. EachIn addition, power grid congestion or capacity constraints, including curtailment of therenewable abovegeneration factors,or among others,storage, can causereduce project economics and delay or limit project development and related services. These and related factors or events can contribute to volatility, illiquidity, economic or market downturns, loss of value, market and supply-chain disruptions, or othersupply‑chain conditionsdisruptions and have potentiallyother adverse effects. For example, increasedactual or threatened sanctions or tariffs (or the threat thereof) can result,lead to, among other effects, in currency devaluation, credit ‑rating downgrades, decreasedreduced liquidity, increased volatility, asset freezes,freezes or retaliatory actions,measures, which can exacerbate cybersecurity, market and other risks. See also Item 1A – Risk Factors – General Risk Factors – Other General Risks – Potential Adverse Effects of Unpredictable Events or Consequences.
In addition, Federated Hermes’ offerings, and their portfolio holdings,investments can be adversely affected, potentially in a material way, by changes in U.S., UK,U.K., EU or other markets, sovereign credit‑rating downgrades of U.S., UK or other countries’ credit ratings, the U.S. debt limit or other developments in the U.S., UK,debt-limit and other countrieseconomic asdevelopments, wellor as byother actual or potential deterioration in international sovereign or other market conditions.
At December 31, 2024,2025, Federated Hermes’ liquid assets of $694.1$769.4 million included investments in certain money market and fluctuating ‑NAV Federated Hermes Funds that can havewith direct and/or indirect exposuresexposure to international sovereign debt and currency risks. Federated Hermes and its money market and other Federated Hermes Funds also rely on and interact with various other financial industry participants, such asincluding counterparties, broker/‑dealers, banks, clearing organizations, other investment offerings, service providers, customers, and shareholders, as a result of operations, trading, distribution, and other relationships. As a result, Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition can be adversely affected by thewhose creditworthiness or financial soundness ofcan otheradversely financialaffect industryFederated participants,Hermes’ Financial Condition, particularly induring timesperiods of stressmarket orstress. disruption.Losses Therearising can be no assurance that any potential losses realized as a result offrom these exposures willcan notmaterially haveadversely a material adverse effect onaffect Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition. The ability of Federated Hermes to compete and sustain asset and revenue growth is dependent, in part, on the relative attractiveness of the types of investment offerings it distributes or markets, and their performance under prevailing market conditions. Adverse market conditions or other events also can impact Federated Hermes’ customers and shareholders. In the event of extreme circumstances, such as economic, political, or business crises, Federated Hermes’ offerings can suffer significant net redemptions in AUM causing severe liquidity issues in its short-term, fixed-income or certain other offerings and declines in the value of and returns on AUM, all of which can cause material adverse effects on Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition.
No Assurance of Access to Sufficient Liquidity or Capital. From time to time, likeLike other companies, Federated Hermes’ operationsoperations, (including corporate initiatives,actions such aslike stock repurchases, acquisitions and other corporate actions)actions, can at times require more cash than isoperations available from operations.generate. In thesesuch circumstances,cases, itFederated Hermes can beborrow necessary to borrowmoney from lending facilities or to raise capital by securingthrough new debt or byequity selling Federated Hermes equityissuances or debt securities.sales. Certain subsidiaries of Federated Hermes, such asincluding its broker-dealer and certain non-U.S. subsidiaries, can also can be required to maintain a specified levelliquidity of liquiditylevels or regulatory capital. Significant changes to required capital, operating losses, or extraordinary charges against required capital can adversely affect their ability to maintain or expand operations if Federated Hermes cannot make additional investments in them. Federated Hermes’ ability to raise additional capital independs theon future will be affected by severalmany factors including, for example, its creditworthiness andcreditworthiness, credit ratingsratings, andstock the market value of its common stock, as well asvalue, interest rates and general market conditions. There can be no assurance that Federated Hermes will be able to obtain or maintain necessary capital or obtain these funds andor financing on acceptable terms, if at all. IfFailure Federated Hermes cannotto obtain or maintain necessaryneeded capital or obtain such funds and financing, it can havematerially aadversely material adverse effect onaffect Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition. IfLikewise, if a Federated Hermes Fund requiresneeds liquidity to meetpay shareholder redemptions or for other reasons, there also can be no assurance thatit such Federated Hermes Fund will be able tocan access anycredit available line of credit, rely onlines, inter-fund lending arrangementsarrangements, or access other liquidity sources of liquidity on acceptable terms, orif at all, and, if such a Federated Hermes Fund cannot obtain sufficient liquidity, itwhich can have a material adverse effect on such Federated Hermes Fund,Fund and result in redemptions and a corresponding reduction in Federated Hermes’ AUM and Federated Hermes’ revenue. While not obligated, if Federated Hermes decideselects to provide credit support to a Federated Hermes Fund, Federatedits Hermes’own liquidity and income can be adversely impacted.affected. These factors can havematerially aadversely material adverse effect onaffect Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition.
Potential Adverse Effects of Changes in Laws, Regulations and Other Regulatory Requirements. Like other companies, Federated Hermes andHermes, its investment management businessbusiness, and its offerings are (and any new business line commenced or acquired by Federated Hermes would be) subject to extensive regulation both withinglobally, and outsideany thenew U.S.business Federatedline, Hermesacquired andbusiness, itsor investmentnew or acquired offerings (suchwould be as the Federated Hermes Funds), are subject to various U.S. and non-U.S. regulatory requirements.well. In the U.S., suchkey regulatory requirements include, among others, the federal securities laws, principallyothers: the 1933 Act, the 1934 Act, the 1940 Act andAct, the Advisers Act and other federal securities laws; state lawsanti-fraud, regardingstate securities fraudregistration and registrationcertain other state laws; and regulations orand other rules, promulgated by various regulatory authorities, self-regulatory organizations or exchanges,exchanges. both domestically and internationally. From time to time, applicable securitiesSecurities laws can be substantially amended substantially.from time to time.
The SEC primarily regulates Federated Hermes and its U.S.‑distributed offerings. FINRA also regulates Federated Hermes, particularly its registered broker-dealer subsidiary. Federated Hermes, and certain Federated Hermes Funds, are also subject to CFTC and National Futures Association (NFA) regulation when their investments in futures, swaps or certain other commodity interests are above de minimis levels.
Outside the U.S., Federated Hermes, its business, and its offerings are regulated by foreign regulatory or other authorities, such as the FCA (U.K.), CBI (Ireland), CIMA (Cayman Islands), Monetary Authority of Singapore, ASIC (Australia) and CSSF (Luxembourg), which can impose different regulatory requirements than in the U.S. Operating outside the U.S. through foreign subsidiaries and offerings organized or distributed outside the U.S. can provide a different (including a lessor) level of legal protections, transparency, and regulatory certainty than in the U.S.
Federated HermesRecent and itsfuture domesticlegislation offerings,by Congress, state legislatures, foreign parliaments, and anyother non-U.S. offerings, to the extent distributed or marketed in the U.S., continue to be primarily regulated by the SEC. Federated Hermes,governments, and certain Federated Hermes Funds, are also subject to regulationrulemaking by the CFTC and the NFA due to their investment in futures, swaps or certain other commodity interests in more than de minimis amounts. In addition, during the past several years, regulators, self-regulatory organizations, or exchanges, such as the SEC, FINRA, CFTC, NFA, NYSE andNYSE, state or local governments and regulators, havethe adopted,FCA, CBI, CIMA, Monetary Authority of Singapore, ASIC, CSSF, and could adopt, other regulatoryregulators, requirementsself-regulatory organizations or exchanges, have increased, and amendmentscan thatfurther have increasedincrease, Federated Hermes’ operating expensesexpenses, and affected the conduct of its offerings, as well as Federated Hermes’its AUM, revenues, and operating income, and can continue to do so.income. Federated Hermes’ offerings are affected by regulatory requirements and regulatory authorities that impact the manner in whichway Federated Hermes’ offerings are structured, marketed, distributed, delivered,delivered or sold. Federated HermesHermes’ stewardship (engagement and itsproxy offeringsrecommendations) services are also are affectedimpacted by certainsecurities laws, proxy‑advisor regulation, antitrust or competition laws, governance, environmental, and social‑related laws, and other regulatory requirements, as well as Congressional and other governmental inquiries, examinations, investigations, hearings, and enforcement. Regulatory requirements governingapplicable to banks, other financial institutions, intermediaries, real estate and power generation can also affect Federated Hermes and its offerings, including changes to renewable energy grid connection, capacity allocation, and permitting regimes that can delay projects or realreduce estate.their viability.
Federated Hermes, and its business and offerings, engaged in, domiciled or offered outside of the U.S. are subject to foreign regulatory requirements, which are promulgated or amended from time to time by foreign regulatory or other authorities, such as the FCA for London-based operations, the CBI for Dublin-based operations, the CIMA for Cayman Island offerings, and the CSSF for Luxembourg offerings. In addition, Federated Hermes’ stewardship (including engagement and proxy recommendation) services can be impacted by securities laws, proxy advisor regulations, antitrust or competition laws, governance, environmental or social-related laws, and other regulatory requirements, as well as Congressional or regulatory/government inquiries, examinations, hearings, investigations, or enforcement actions.
Failure to comply with applicable U.S. and non-U.S. regulatory requirements in the various jurisdictions where Federated Hermes operates, and its offerings are distributed or marketed, can result in a wide range of liability or disciplinary actions against Federated Hermes or its business or offerings, which can impact, potentially in a material way, Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition. Breaches of regulatory requirements can result in regulatory enforcement, civil or criminal liability, and/or the imposition of sanctions or ordersrestrictive orders, and/or a wide range of liability or other disciplinary actions against or affecting Federated Hermes, or its business or its offerings, including monetary damages, injunctions, disgorgements, fines, penalties, cease and desist orders, censures, reprimands, and the revocation, cancellation, suspension or restriction of licenses, registration status or required approvals. A public regulatory issue can also have a negative impact on Federated Hermes’ reputation,reputation. and asAccordingly, a resultfailure impactto comply with applicable regulatory requirements can affect, potentially in a material way, Federated Hermes’ offerings and Financial Condition.
AsGrowth of Federated Hermes’ business and offerings grow (whether organicallyorganic or through acquisition,acquisitions, newproduct offeringsexpansion, beingmarket distributedappreciation, or marketed, increased market values of assets held by or in offerings, expansionentry into new countries, jurisdictions or markets, or otherwise), Federatedcan Hermes’increase offeringscompliance obligations, costs and operationsrisk, needreporting to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, which increases compliance riskrisks, and operating expenses, including reporting risks and the costs associated with compliance.costs. The pace of the issuance and adoption/enactment of new regulatory developments and regulatory requirements, overlapping compliance deadlines, and actual or potential conflicts amongst requirements and regulatory approaches across or among the various jurisdictions where Federated Hermes operates, and its offerings are distributed or marketed, compound compliance risks, internal and external resource requirements, and operational costs. Compliance risk, internal and external resource requirements, and operating expenses also can increase as Federated Hermes continues to expand its use of governance, environmental or social, sustainability, stewardship or other data inputs or investment techniques in providing its offerings, as well as when markets, customer or shareholder requirements, support models and technology increase in complexity. Federated Hermes has taken steps to integrate the proprietary insights from fundamental investment analysis, including governance, environmental or social factors and engagement interactions, into many of its offerings. Related compliance expense is further exacerbated by the increasing spectrum of governance, environmental or social disclosure requirements that can differ between jurisdictions, countries and markets, as well as jurisdiction-specific legislation affecting the ability to utilize certain (e.g., non-material) governance, environmental or social research factors to manage certain customer assets (such as state government or pension fund assets). Failure to comply with legal and regulatory requirements, or changes to legal and regulatory requirements, whether due to conflicts of interest, breaches of fiduciary duty, trading on the basis of material nonpublic information, other improper conduct by employees or service providers, inadequate processes, procedures and controls, or other causes, can impact market integrity, customer or shareholder outcomes and satisfaction, performance and Federated Hermes’ reputation, as well as its compliance with its investment advisory and other agreements, licensing requirements and governance and compliance policies, and result in lost business, fines, penalties or other sanctions. Significant or repeated failures also can change Federated Hermes’ regulators’ views of, and relationship with, Federated Hermes. Regulators or other government bodies also have undertaken or couldcan undertake examinations, investigations, inquiries, hearings and/or enforcement actions involving investment management industry participants, such as Federated Hermes and its offerings. Regulators also can adopt new or different interpretations of regulatory requirements, either through formal rulemaking or informally through enforcement proceedings, no-action letters, or exemptive orders or through providing comments to filings, which can negatively affect, potentially in a material way, Federated Hermes’ offerings or its ability to operate.
Federated Hermes expends internal and external resources to respond to examinations, Congressional/government inquiries and investigations, to defend hearings and enforcement actions, and to resolve comments from regulators, which increases operating expenses, including professional fees and costs of compliance. Federated Hermes continues to monitor and evaluate the impact of the regulatory developments and regulatory requirements discussed above (and in Item 1- Business – Regulatory Matters) on Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition. Among other potential impacts, increases in regulatory developments and requirements have increased,led, and couldcan continue to increase, in additionlead to greater compliance risks and compliance costs, theincluding increased costs associated with technology, legal, operations and other efforts to address regulatory-related matters. Deregulation also is a possibility. Regulatory developments and requirements also have caused, and can continue to cause: (1) certain offering line-up, structure, pricing and product development changes; (2) changes in the ability to utilize “soft dollars” to pay for certain research and brokerage services (rather than Federated Hermes paying for such services directly); (3) money market, equity, fixed-income, alternative/private markets and multi-asset offerings becoming less attractive to institutional and other investors; (4) reductions in the Federated Hermes Funds offered by intermediary customers; (5) changes in fees charged, asset flows, levels and mix, and customer or shareholder relationships; and (6) reductions in AUM, revenues and operating profits. For example, certain money market funds or other offerings can become less attractive to institutional or other investors, which can change asset mix and reduce AUM, revenues and operating income. Changes in money market fund regulation increasesincrease this risk.
In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act provides for a systemic risk regulation regime under which it is possible that Federated Hermes, and/or any one or more of its offerings couldcan be subject to designation as a systemically important financial institution (SIFI) by the FSOC. Similarly, it is possible that the FSB couldcan designate Federated Hermes, and/or one of its offerings (such as the non-U.S. Federated Hermes Funds), as a non-bank, non-insurance company global SIFI. Among other potential impacts, any such designation would result in Federated Hermes and/or its offerings being subject to additional banking regulation and bank-oriented measures and oversight by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Systemor orthe FSB. Any such designation of Federated Hermes or one or more of its offerings (particularly money market funds) would be detrimental to Federated Hermes’ business and offerings,offerings and can materially and adversely affect Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition.
In addition, a FTT, particularly if enacted with broad application in the UKU.K., orthe EU, or the U.S., would be detrimental to Federated Hermes’ business and offerings.
Federated Hermes’ business and offerings also have been,been and will continue to be impacted by changes in tax laws. Any repeal of U.S. tax laws that allow ETFs to receive favorable treatment of certain redemptions can adversely impact Federated Hermes’ ETF offerings and business. When tax laws are amended to increase taxes applicable to Federated Hermes, its offerings, customers, shareholders and service providers, the increased tax expense can have an adverse impact, potentially in a material way, on Federated Hermes’ offerings’ and strategies’ performance, AUM, and service provider fees, and Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition. The failure to properly calculate, report and remit such taxes also can subject Federated Hermes, its offerings, customers, shareholders and service providers to additional tax liability, fines and penalties. In addition, various service industries, including, for example, mutual fund service providers, have been, and continue to be, the subject of changes in tax policy that impact their state and local tax liability. Changes that have been adopted or proposed include: (1) an expansion of the nature of a service company’s activities or services that subject it, or Federated Hermes or its offerings, to tax in a jurisdiction, (e.g., income, sales, use or other types of taxes),; (2) a change in the methodology by which multi-state companies apportion their income between jurisdictions,jurisdictions; and (3) a requirement that affiliated companies calculate their state tax as one combined entity. As adopted changes become effective and additional jurisdictions enact similar changes, among other potential impacts, there can be a material adverse effect on Federated Hermes’ tax liability and effective tax rate and, as a result, net income. Tax changes also can adversely affect Federated Hermes’ offerings and Financial Condition.
Potential Adverse Effects of Litigation, Investigations, Proceedings and Other Claims. Like other companies, Federated Hermes,Hermes and its offeringsofferings, (such as the Federated Hermes Funds and Federated Hermes’its stewardship business),business, can beface subject to regulatoryone or more (including potentially parallel) regulatory, Congressional/governmentgovernmental examinations, inquiries, investigations, hearings, enforcement actions, litigationlitigation, and other claims and proceedings. Regarding examinations, Federated Hermes and its offerings are subject toundergo routine, sweep and other examinations, inquiries, investigations, proceedings (administrative, regulatory, civil, or otherwise) and other claims by its regulators (regulatory claims). Federated Hermes and its offerings also can be subject to employee, former employee, customer, shareholder and other third-party,face complaints, proceedings (such as civil litigation) and other claims from employees, former employees, customers, shareholders, or other third parties (business-related claims). As Federated Hermes’ business and offerings grow (whether organically or through acquisition,organic growthexpansion, inacquisitions, rising AUM, or new offerings being distributed or marketed, or otherwise), the attention and resources devoted to compliance, and the possibility of noncompliance, can increase. TheCompliance attentiondemands and resourcesnoncompliance devotedrisk to compliance, and the possibility of noncompliance, as well as the threat of Congressional/government inquiries, investigations, hearings, or enforcement actions, or other litigation,can also can increase as Federated Hermes usesand its offerings expand into new jurisdictions or markets, offer new investment offerings, and incorporate governance, environmental orenvironmental, social, sustainability, stewardshipstewardship, or other data inputs or investment techniques in providing its offerings, enters new countries, jurisdictions,techniques, or markets, and offers financial investment offerings, as well as when markets, customer requirements, support models and technology increasebecome inmore complexity.complex. Federated Hermes has business-related claims asserted and threatened against it, and Federated Hermes and its offerings are subject to certain regulatory claims (such as routine and sweep examinations and other inquiries), in the ordinary course of business. In addition, Federated Hermes, and its offerings, can be subject to business-related claims, claims related to Federated Hermes sponsorship or management of, or inclusion of proprietary offerings in, its 401(k) plan or other benefit plans, and administrative, regulatory, or civil investigations and proceedings or other regulatory claims, outside of the ordinary course of business. For example, in August 2023, a class action lawsuit was filed, on behalf of the Federated Hermes, Inc. Employees Profit Sharing/401(Kk) Plan (Plan), in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (Western District) against Federated Hermes and certain other defendants alleging breach of their fiduciary duties of prudence and loyalty, and certain other causes of action, relating to administering the Plan. In March 2025, a former employee filed a lawsuit against Federated Hermes alleging discrimination. In July 2023, Federated Hermes, and a subsidiary, also filed suit in the Western District against its first two primary insurance carriers relating to Federated Hermes’ claims for coverage of certain losses incurred.
Risks Related to Auditor Independence. As with other public companies, there can be no assurance that a registered public accounting firm (Accounting Firm) engaged by Federated Hermes or the Federated Hermes Funds to audit or review their respective financial statements will remain eligible to serve as the independent Accounting Firm to Federated Hermes or any Federated Hermes Fund under applicable securities laws. Similar toLike other fund sponsors that are public companies, certain Federated Hermes Funds also utilize the Accounting Firm engaged by Federated Hermes. If it were to be determined that the independence requirements under applicable securities laws or International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) rules, or any applicable similar rules in relevant jurisdictions outside the U.S., were not complied with regarding Federated Hermes, its previously filed Annual Reports on Form 10-K (including financial statements audited by its existing Accounting Firm) and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q (including financial statements reviewed by its existing Accounting Firm) might not be considered compliant with the applicable securities laws and/or IESBA rules. If it were to be determined that an Accounting Firm did not comply with the independence requirements, among other things, the financial statements audited by the Accounting Firm and the interim financial statements reviewed by the Accounting Firm could have to be audited and reviewed, respectively, by another independent Accounting Firm, Federated Hermes' eligibility to issue securities under its existing registration statements can be impacted and certain financial reporting and/or other covenants with, and representations and warranties to, Federated Hermes' lenders or debt holders can be impacted. Similar issues would arise for a Federated Hermes Fund for which Federated Hermes' Accounting Firm (or another Accounting Firm) serves as such Federated Hermes Fund's independent Accounting Firm if it were to be determined that Federated Hermes' Accounting Firm (or such other Accounting Firm) was not in compliance with the independence requirements under applicable securities laws and/or IESBA rules, or any applicable similar rules in relevant jurisdictions outside the U.S., with respect to such Federated Hermes Fund. If a determination cannot be made that the Accounting Firm satisfies the independence requirements with respect to an applicable Federated Hermes Fund, the Accounting Firm also can be prevented from making a determination that it satisfies the independence requirements with respect to Federated Hermes, since Federated Hermes would be an affiliate (i.e., the ultimate parent company) of the investment advisor to the relevant Federated Hermes Fund. In either case, such events can have a material adverse effect on Federated Hermes' Financial Condition.
Operational Risks. Like other companies, Federated Hermes’ business, offeringsofferings, and operations arerely supportedglobally internallyon internal resources and through management of relationships, including, for example,numerous outsourcing relationships,and vendor relationships with various third-partythird‑party service providers, bothwhose domestically and internationally. In turn, service providers’own operations relydepend on additional relationshipsthird‑party with other third parties.relationships. Operational risks include, butamong are not limited toothers: improper, inefficient,inefficient or unauthorized transaction execution, processing, pricing and/or monitoring of transactions; inadequate, deficient, inefficient, inflexible, non-resilient, deficient or non-scalablenon‑scalable technology, processes, operating systems, security or other infrastructure, resources or controls; poor performanceunderperformance by internal resources or third partythird-party service providers; failureinadequate torecruiting, appropriatelysupervision, attract,training, retain,retention train,or supervisepromotion and promoteof the wellbeingwell-being and resiliency of qualified human capital resources,resources (whether internal or external; failure to perform due diligence on third party service providers (particularly when due diligence is conducted remotely); business disruptions; supply chain disruptions (whether within Federated Hermes or third party); employee turnover (whether because of retirement or otherwise, and particularly involving executives, management or other key employees); failureinsufficient due diligence on third-party service providers; business or supply‑chain disruptions; health and safety incidents and work conditions involving employees, contractors, or third parties at facilities and project sites; failures to effectively upgradeupgrade, patch, integrate, modernize or patch, or decommission, integrate, or modernize,decommission technology or transition to a “cloud-based” environment; inadequaciesweaknesses in or breaches in Federated Hermes’, its investment offerings’ or a service provider’sof governance policies or internal controlcontrols processes(whether by Federated Hermes, its offerings, or third-party service providers); unauthorized disclosure or manipulation of, or access to, confidential, proprietary or non-public personal or business information; unauthorized access to accounts, applications or systems; and noncompliance with regulatory requirements, investment mandates and related investment parametersparameters, regulatory requirements or customer-imposed restrictions. As Federated Hermes’Hermes and its relevant service providers’ businessesproviders expand or becomeface moreincreasing complexcomplexity andor requirecustomization additionalor scalability or customization,needs, operational risk increases.can Thereincrease. isSystem aor riskprocess thatchanges, changes (including upgrades or patches)patches, can be implemented in operationalan systems,improperly modelscontrolled andenvironment, businessineffectively, processesuntimely, are not completed correctlyinefficiently or inincorrectly, acreating controlled, timely, integrated or effective manner. These types of changes also give rise to otheradditional risks, such asas, theamong riskothers, that an employee, service providerintentional or thirdunintentional party, or groupcompromise of employees, service providers or third parties, can intentionally or unintentionally compromise the integrity or security of confidential, proprietary or personal information or other data of Federated Hermes, its employees oremployees, its customers, shareholders, service providers or serviceother providers.third Managementparties. Federated Hermes relies on itsemployees, service providersproviders, and employees, systems,technology, and business continuity plans,plans to comply with established procedures, controls, regulatory requirements, investment parameters or customer-imposedcustomer‑imposed restrictions. BreakdownFailures in or improper use of systems, human error orerror, improper action by employees or service providers,actions, or noncompliance with regulatory requirements, investment parameters or customer-imposed restrictions, can causematerially materialadversely adverse effects onaffect Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition.
Systems, Technology and Cybersecurity Risks. Like other companies, Federated Hermes utilizes software and related technologies throughout its business, including, for example, both proprietary systems and those provided by outside service providers. Service providers to whom certain services, functions or responsibilities are outsourced by or for, and customers and shareholders of, Federated Hermes and its offerings, and third parties on which such service providers, customers and shareholders rely, also utilize software and related technologies in their businesses. Certain software applications that Federated Hermes uses in its business are licensed by, and supported, upgraded, and maintained by, third-party vendors. A suspension or termination of certain of these licenses or the related support, upgrades, and maintenance can cause temporary system delays or interruptions that can adversely affect Federated Hermes’ business and offerings. Federated Hermes continues to increase its investment in systems and technology, including externally hosted or cloud-based systems and technology, and its reliance on third parties, for investment management and trading operations, information and data management and governance, disaster recovery, compliance, and other areas of its business, and continues to explore innovative technological solutions and offerings involving artificial intelligence and financial technology. Federated Hermes has adopted a measured approach to artificial intelligence technology given reliability, cybersecurity, and other concerns, and it is possible that competitors will more quickly or effectively implement the use of artificial intelligence technology giving them a competitive advantage over Federated Hermes. Unanticipated issues also can occur with any software, system or other technology and it is not possible to predict with certainty all of the adverse effects that can result from a failure of Federated Hermes or a third party to address technology or computer system problems. Along with cyber incidents described more fully below, business changes, data or model imprecision, control failures, obsolescence, software or other technology malfunctions, severe weather, natural disaster or other climate conditions, human error, programming inaccuracies and similar or other circumstances or events can impair the performance of systems and technology or render them non-available. Systems and technology risk has increased as Federated Hermes’ systems and technology are integrated and deployed on an enterprise-wide basis. There can be no assurance that potential system interruptions, other technology-related issues, or the cost necessary to rectify the problems would not have a material adverse effect on Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition.
Like other companies, Federated Hermes has experienced, and will continue to experience, cyber incidents on a daily basis.daily. As of December 31, 2024,2025, cyber incidents have not had a material adverse effect on Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition. Cyber incidents can affect, potentially in a material way, Federated Hermes’ relationships with its offerings, accounts, customers, employees, shareholders, relevant service providers and other third parties. A cyber incident can cause Federated Hermes, its business, offerings, accounts, customers, employees, shareholders or relevant service providers, or other third parties, to lose proprietary, sensitive, confidential or non-public business offering, account, customer, employee, shareholder, or personal information, or intellectual property, suffer data corruption or business interruption, impair data coverage or quality, lose operational capacity (for example, the loss of the ability to process transactions, generate or make filings or deliver reports or statements, calculate NAVs, or allow the transaction of business, or other disruptions to operations), and/or fail to comply with applicable privacy and other regulatory requirements. Among other potentially harmful effects, cyber incidents also can result in theft, unauthorized monitoring and failures in the physical infrastructure or operating systems. Any cyber incident can cause lost revenues, the occurrence of other financial losses, diminished future cash flows, significant increases in compliance or other costs or expenses (such as costs associated with compliance with cybersecurity regulatory requirements, protection, detection, remediation and corrective measures, and credit monitoring for impacted individuals), exposure to increased litigation and legal risks (such as regulatory actions and penalties, and breach of contract or other litigation-related fees and expenses), reputational damage, damage to employee perceptions of the company, damage to competitiveness, stock price and shareholder value, and other negative or adverse impacts. Cyber incidents affecting issuers in which Federated Hermes’ or its customers’ or shareholders’ assets are invested also can cause such investments to lose value. Any of these cyber incidents can become incrementally worse if they were to remain undetected for an extended period of time.period.
The operating systems of Federated Hermes, and its offerings, customers, shareholders, and relevant service providers are dependent on the effectiveness of information security policies and procedures (both at Federated Hermes and its service providers) which seek to ensure that such systems are protected from cyber incidents. Federated Hermes has established a committee to oversee Federated Hermes’ information security and data governance efforts, and updates on cyber incidents and risks are reviewed with relevant committees, as well as Federated Hermes’ board of directors (or a committee thereof), on a periodic (generally quarterly) basis (and more frequently when circumstances warrant) as part of risk management oversight responsibilities. Federated Hermes has, and believes its offerings and its service providers have, established risk management systems that are reasonably designed to seek to reduce the risks associated with cyber incidents. Federated Hermes employs various measures aimed at mitigating cyber risk, including, among others, use of firewalls, system segmentation, system monitoring, virus scanning, periodic penetration testing, employee phishing training and an employee cybersecurity awareness campaign. Among other service provider management efforts, Federated Hermes conducts due diligence on key service providers relating to cybersecurity. However, there is no guarantee that such efforts will be successful, either entirely or partially, as there are limits on Federated Hermes’ ability to prevent, detect, or mitigate cyber incidents. Among other reasons, the cybersecurity landscape is constantly evolving, the nature of malicious cyber incidents is becoming increasingly sophisticated and Federated Hermes, and its relevant affiliates and offerings, cannot control the systems and cybersecurity systems and practices of issuers, relevant service providers or other third parties. Federated Hermes’ risk from cyber incidents also can increase as a resultbecause of expansion into new markets, jurisdictions or countries, acquisitions, new technology, or previously unexploited vulnerabilities in software or related patches becoming activated (or “weaponized”) by hackers.
Artificial Intelligence Risks. Federated Hermes has begun using artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies to enhance certain workflows and processes used in its business. Artificial intelligence is still in its early stages, and the introduction and incorporation of artificial intelligence technologies maycan result in unintended consequencesconsequences, emerging ethical issues, or other new or expanded risks and liabilities.liabilities (including, without limitation, reputational harm and legal liability). If the content, analyses, or recommendations that artificial intelligence applications assist in producing are, or are alleged to be, deficient, inaccurate, or biased, such as due to limitations in artificial intelligence algorithms, insufficient or biased base data or flawed training methodologies, Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition can be adversely affected. Additionally, artificial intelligence technology is continuously evolving, and Federated Hermes can incur costs to adopt and deploy artificial intelligence technologies that couldcan become obsolete earlier than expected, and there can be no assurance that Federated Hermes will realize the desired or anticipated benefits from artificial intelligence. Also, Federated Hermes’ competitors, customers, intermediaries, shareholders, service providerscompetitors and other third parties can incorporate artificial intelligence into their investment offerings more quickly or more successfully than Federated Hermes, which couldcan impair Federated Hermes’ ability to compete effectively and adversely affect its Financial Condition.
Recruiting and Retaining Key Personnel (Human Capital Resource Management Risk). Like other industries, the investment management business is highly competitivecompetitive, and experienced professionals have significant career mobility. Federated Hermes’ ability to attract or acquire, and motivate and retain, quality personnel has contributed significantly to its growth and success and is important to attracting and retaining customers and shareholders. The market for qualified executives, portfolio managers, analysts, traders, sales representatives and other key personnel is extremely competitive. The move to hybrid work environments (including opportunities to work from home provided by competitors), along with increases in competitor salaries, has increased competition for quality personnel, and made hiring and retaining qualified and experienced personnel more challenging. Regulatory requirements, business performance and a lack of financial flexibility also are factors in attracting and retaining qualified personnel. There can be no assurance that Federated Hermes will be successful in its efforts to recruit or acquire, and motivate, train and retain, the required personnel. In addition to competing opportunities, personnel elect to pursue other interests for business, personal and other reasons or retire from time to time. The post-coronavirus pandemic work environment, and related work environment changes, including hybrid-working arrangements, can create retention and other human capital resource management risks. State and federal regulatory requirements intended to limit or curtail the enforceability of non-competition, employee non-solicitation, confidentiality and similar restrictive covenant clauses can make it more difficult to retain qualified personnel. Federated Hermes has encouraged the continued retention of its executives and other key personnel through measures such as providing competitive compensation arrangements, a non-discriminatory, diverse, and inclusive work environment, work arrangement flexibility and, in certain cases, employment agreements. The internal transfer or departure of any such personnel can have an adverse effect on Federated Hermes. In certain circumstances, the internal transfertransfer, retirement or other departure of key employees can cause higher redemption rates for certain AUM, the loss of customer or shareholder relationships.relationships, or create risk that job responsibilities are not successfully re-distributed or transferred.transferred or experience, management skills and/or institutional business knowledge are not retained. Moreover, since certain of Federated Hermes’ offerings, or customer or shareholder relationships, contribute significantly to its revenues and earnings, the loss of even a small number of key personnel associated with these offerings, or customer or shareholder relationships, can have a disproportionate adverse impact, potentially in a material way, on Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition. In addition, due to the global nature of Federated Hermes’ business, key personnel can have reasons to travel to regions susceptible to higher risk of civil unrest, organized crime, or terrorism, and it can be difficult for Federated Hermes to ensure the safety of personnel traveling to such regions. See Item 1 – Business – Human Capital Resource Management for additional information on recruiting and retention practices.
No Assurance of Successful Acquisitions.Strategic Transactions. Like other companies, Federated Hermes’ business strategy contemplates seeking acquisition candidates and other business relationships, and growing through acquisitions.such acquisitions and other strategic transactions, each of which involves risks and uncertainties. For Federated Hermes, this generally involves acquisitions of other investment management companies, investment assets and related businesses, both domestically and internationally. There can be no assurance that Federated Hermes will find suitable acquisition candidates or opportunities for other strategic transactions at acceptable prices and with an aligned business culture and vision, have sufficient capital resources to realize its acquisition or strategic strategy, be successful in entering into definitive acquisition or transaction agreements or consummating acquisitions,acquisitions or other strategic transactions, or successfully collaborating with, or integrating or consolidating, acquired companiescompanies, other businesses or assets into Federated Hermes or its offerings. There also can be no assurance that any such acquisitions,acquisitions or other strategic transactions, if consummated, will not increase organizational stress to unacceptable levels or cause process failures, result in violations of applicable regulatory requirements, increasedincrease taxes or otherwise increase legal, tax or compliance concerns, or will increase value or otherwise prove to be advantageous to Federated Hermes. On the other hand, successful collaboration with, or integration or consolidation of, acquired companiescompanies, other businesses, or assets can increase the value of such acquired companiescompanies, businesses or assets and result in increased contingent deferred payments or other payment obligations for Federated Hermes, which can affect Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition.
Potential Adverse Effects of Reputational Harm. Like other companies, any material losses in customer or shareholder confidence in Federated Hermes, or its offerings, or in the investment management industry as a result of actual or potential regulatory proceedings or litigation, economic or market downturns or disruptions, material errors in public news reports, political or other views for or against governance, environmental or social investing or integration, oppositions to trademark or other intellectual property registration applications or allegations of trade name, trademark or other intellectual property infringement or misappropriation, allegations of breaches of fiduciary duty, actual or perceived misconduct or unprofessional, unethical or illegal behavior, improper corporate actions, poor communications with investors or the public via social media or otherwise, abuse of authority, a cyber incident, rumors or inaccurate information being posted on the internet or social media, failure to achieve carbon neutrality, climate change or other public commitments or pledges, failure to implement or accurately disclose governance, environmental or social strategies or initiatives, controversial tenants in real estate owned or managed by Federated Hermes, fraudulent or fake websites or domain names using Federated Hermes’ or a subsidiary’s name, logo or address, or similar names, logos or addresses, misleading or unfavorable research or reports published by securities or industry analysts about Federated Hermes or its business prospects or other matters can negatively impact Federated Hermes’ brand, culture, trusted status, reputation and/or stock price, increase redemptions from and/or reduce sales of Federated Hermes’ offerings (such as the Federated Hermes Funds) and/or change employee or potential employee perceptions of the company which can impact the willingness of a potential employee to be hired by, or an employee to remain at, Federated Hermes. If such losses or events were to occur, it can have a material adverse effect on Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition. With increased focus on sustainability (including governance, environmental or social matters), any perceived deficiency in Federated Hermes’ policies and practices on, or political or other public backlash against, these matters can impact Federated Hermes’ brand, reputation or stock price, as well as investor preference for Federated Hermes’ securities and offerings, and, accordingly, adversely affect, potentially in a material way, Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition.
Potential Adverse Effects of Unpredictable Events or Consequences. Like other companies, unpredictable events, such as a natural disaster, unforeseen risks associated with the coronavirus pandemic or a new pandemic, war, or military escalation (such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine or the Israel-Hamas war), terrorist attack or other business continuity event, unexpected market, or economic developments, such as changes in interest rates, or political developments, including shifts in governmental support for renewable energy or changes in permitting, planning or consenting regimes, or extreme weather, droughts, storms, climate, or other similar governance, environmental or social changes (particularly in the case of portfolio companies in which Federated Hermes’ investment offerings are invested), or unpredictable consequences or side effects of certain known, unknown, planned, or unexpected events, can adversely impact Federated Hermes’, its offerings’, accounts’, customers’, shareholders’ and portfolio companies’ (in which Federated Hermes and its offerings are invested), and each of their respective service providers’, ability to conduct business, as well as Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition. Physical climate change risks arising from changing or adverse weather and climate change (particularly in the case of portfolio companies in which Federated Hermes’ offerings are invested), and transition climate change risks arising as economies and markets transition to low carbon and other environments, also can have adverse impacts. Such unpredictable events or consequences can cause, among other effects, business disruptions, supply chain disruptions, disruptions in economic conditions, market disruptions or transformation, changes in management or governmental processes, changes in consumer demand and investor preferences, obsolescence of certain offerings affecting certain sectors, stranded assets across a range of assets, sectors or geographies, infrastructure and real estate destruction, abandonment or damage leading to increased refurbishment and repair costs, changes in technology, system interruption, loss of life, unavailability of personnel, increased insurance costs or an inability to insure certain assets, an inability to provide information or services, either at all or in accordance with applicable requirements, standards, or restrictions, and/or additional costs.
There can be no assurance that unpredictable or unexpected events, reports or consequences, or the costs to address such events, inaccurate reports, or consequences, would not have a material adverse effect on Federated Hermes’ Financial Condition.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Business Combination”
New heading “1) A Separate Account was reclassified from Multi-Asset to Equity effective October 1, 2025.”
Removed heading “Intangible Asset Impairment”
Largest changes
“Operating Expenses. Total operating expenses for 2024 increased $48.6 million compared to 2023. Intangible Asset Related expense increased $65.5 million primarily due to an impairment of an indefinite-lived intangible asset (see Note (9) to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information). Distribution expense increased $11.1 million primarily related to higher average managed money market fund assets. …”see in full comparison
Average managed assets increasedsee in full comparison12%8% for20242025 as compared to2023.2024. Period-end managed assets increased 9% at December 31,20242025 as compared to December 31,2023,2024, primarily from an increase in money market and equity assets. Total average money market assets increased15%9% for20242025 compared to2023.2024. Period-end money market assets increased13%8% at December 31,20242025 as compared to December 31,2023.2024. The Federal Reserveloweredimplementedtheafederalseriesfundsof three ratethreecuts,times beginningstarting inSeptember,Septembersettling2025, landing at a range of4.25%3.5% to4.5%3.75%inbyDecember,December 2025, and U.S. money market funds reached a record high atnearly $7$8.2 trillion. Money market funds continued to offer a yield advantage compared to some securities in the direct market, especially overnight securities and those with floating rates, which trace the Federal Reserve moves immediately. Average equity assetsdecreasedincreased2%11% for20242025 as compared to2023.2024. Period-end equity assetsremainedincreasedflat23% at December 31,20242025 as compared to December 31,20232024 primarily due to market appreciationnearlyand,completelytooffsetabylesser extent, netredemptions.sales. The S&P 500 finished the year up more than21%,16%,aidedasbytech stocks continued to drive returns, although market breadth improved late in thetech stocks, which benefited from the artificial intelligence boom.year. Average fixed-income assets increased9%3% for20242025 as compared to2023.2024. Period-end fixed-income assets increased3%2% at December 31,20242025 as compared to December 31,20232024 primarily due to marketappreciation.appreciation, partially offset by net redemptions. Overall, fixed-income marketshaddeliveredasolidvolatileperformance in 2025, with most fixed-income asset classes offering gains. Throughout the year,withyieldssurging late in 2024 on concerns over a potential reacceleration of inflation. Yieldson the 10-Year Treasury noteincreasedtradedfromin3.9%aatrangethebetweenstarta low of 3.97% and a high of 4.79%, closing the yeartoatabove4.18%,4.5%slightlybylower than theyear’syear-endend.2024 level. Average alternative/private markets assets decreased 4% for20242025 as compared to2023.2024. Period-end alternative/private markets assetsdecreasedincreased8%1% at December 31,20242025 as compared to December 31,20232024 primarily due to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, partially offset by net redemptions.
“1) A Separate Account was reclassified from Multi-Asset to Equity effective October 1, 2025.”see in full comparison
“Operating Expenses. Total operating expenses for 2025 increased $16.2 million compared to 2024. Distribution expense increased $52.1 million primarily related to higher average money market fund assets. Compensation and Related expense increased $37.2 million primarily due to higher incentive compensation and merit increases. Systems and Communications expense increased $5.9 million primarily due to increased technology initiatives. …”see in full comparison
see in full comparisonReceivables—AffiliatesReceivables, net at December 31, 2025 decreased $22.4 million from December 31, 2024 primarily due to (1) the reclassification of the $15.9 million insurance reimbursement receivable (see Note (20) to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information) from short-term to long-term due to delays in the litigation and (2) the 2025 receipt of performance fees accrued at December 31, 2024decreased $12.4 million from December 31, 2023 primarily due to a decrease in investment advisory and administrative service fees($5.3 million) and the 2024 receipt of carried interest earned in 2023 ($4.4$6.8 million).
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (40)
Federated Hermes is a global leader in active, responsibleactive investing with $829.6$902.6 billion in managed assets as of December 31, 2024.2025. The majority of Federated Hermes’ revenue is derived from advising Federated Hermes Funds and Separate Accounts in domestic and international public and private markets. Federated Hermes also derives revenue from providing administrative and other fund-related services (including distribution and shareholder servicing) as well as stewardship andstewardship, real estate development and renewable energy project development services. For additional information on Federated Hermes’ markets, see Item 1 – Business – Distribution Channels and Product Markets.
Investment advisory fees, administrative service fees and certain fees for other services, such as distribution and shareholder service fees, are contract-based and are generally calculated as a percentage of the average net assets of managed investment portfolios. Federated Hermes’ revenue is primarily dependent upon factors that affect the value of managed/serviced assets, including market conditions and the ability to attract and retain assets. Generally, managed assets in Federated Hermes’ public market investment products and strategies (together with other offered services, as applicable, offerings) can be redeemed or withdrawn at any time with no advance notice requirement, while managed assets in Federated Hermes’ private market investment offerings are subject to restrictions toon withdrawals. Fee rates for Federated Hermes’ services generally vary by asset and service type and can vary based on changes in asset levels. Generally, advisory fees charged for services provided to multi-asset and equity offerings are higher than advisory fees charged to alternative/private markets and fixed-income offerings, which in turn are higher than advisory fees charged to money market offerings. Likewise, Federated Hermes Funds typically have higher advisory fees than Separate Accounts. Similarly, revenue is also dependent upon the relative composition of average AUM across both asset and offering types. Federated Hermes can implement fee waiverswaivers, rebates or expense reimbursements for competitive reasons such as to maintain positive or zero net yields (Voluntary Yield-related Fee Waivers,Waivers), to maintain certain fund expense ratios, to meet regulatory requirements or to meet contractual requirements (collectively, Fee Waivers). Since Federated Hermes’ public market offerings are largely distributed and serviced through financial intermediary customers, Federated Hermes paysmakes apayments, portionout of feesits earnedreasonable fromprofits sponsoredand offeringsother resources, to the financial intermediary customers that sell these offerings. These payments are generally calculated as a percentage of net assets attributable to the applicable financial intermediary and represent the vast majority of Distribution expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Certain components of Distribution expense can vary depending upon the asset type, distribution channel and/or the size of the customer relationship. Federated Hermes generally pays out a larger portion of the revenue earned from managed assets in equity, money marketmarket, multi-asset, and multi-assetfixed-income funds than the revenue earned from managed assets in fixed-incomeequity and alternative/private markets funds.
Federated Hermes’ most significant operating expenses are Compensation and Related expense and Distribution expense. Compensation and Related expense includes base salary and wages, incentive compensation and other employee expensesexpenses, including payroll taxes and benefits. Incentive compensation, which includes share-based compensation, can vary depending on various factors including, but not limited to, the overall results of operations of Federated Hermes, investment management performance and sales performance.
The discussion and analysis of Federated Hermes’ Financialfinancial Conditioncondition (includingand results of operations) are based on Federated Hermes’ Consolidated Financial Statements. Federated Hermes operates in one operating segment, the investment management business. Management analyzes all expected revenue and expenses and considers market demands in determining an overall fee structure for services provided and in evaluating the addition of new business. Federated Hermes’ growth and profitability are dependent upon its ability to attract and retain AUM and upon the profitability of those assets, which is impacted, in part, by Fee Waivers. Fees for mutual fund-related services are ultimately subject to the approval of the independent directors or trustees of the mutual funds and, as required by law, fund shareholders. Management believes that meaningful indicators of Federated Hermes’ financial performance include AUM, gross and net offering sales, total revenue and net income, both in total and per diluted share.
Business Combination
On April 7, 2025, FHL acquired a majority (60%) equity interest in Rivington Energy Management Limited (Rivington), a U.K.-based renewable energy project development business. See Note (3) to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
On October 23, 2025, Federated Hermes entered into an agreement to acquire a majority (80%) interest in FCP Fund Manager, L.P. (FCP), a U.S.-based real estate investment manager. The transaction is expected to be completed in the second quarter 2026. See Note (3) to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Intangible Asset Impairment
During the second quarter of 2024, a $66.3 million non-cash impairment of an indefinite-lived intangible asset associated with the 2018 FHL acquisition was recorded in Intangible Asset Related expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income. See Note (9) to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to the impairment of this indefinite-lived intangible asset. There were no other impairments during the year ended December 31, 2024.
With Federated Hermes’ global operations, Federated Hermes, and certain of its subsidiaries and offerings (such as the Federated Hermes Funds), are registered with or licensed by, and subject to examination by, various U.S. and/or non-U.S. regulators, self-regulatory agencies or exchanges, such as, among others, the SEC, FINRA, CFTC, DOL, NYSE, FCA, CBI, CIMA, Monetary Authority of Singapore, ASICSASIC and CSSF.
1) A Separate Account was reclassified from Multi-Asset to Equity effective October 1, 2025.
Changes in Total Long-Term Fund and Separate Account Assets
Changes in Federated Hermes’ average asset mix year-over-year across both asset classes and offering types have a direct impact on Federated Hermes’ operating income. Asset mix impacts Federated Hermes’ total revenue due to the difference in the fee rates earned on each asset class and offering type per invested dollar,dollar and certain components of distribution expense can vary depending upon the asset class, distribution channel and/or the size of the customer relationship. The following table presents the relative composition of average managed assets and the percent of total revenue derived from each asset class and offering type overfor the last three years:
Average managed assets increased 12%8% for 20242025 as compared to 2023.2024. Period-end managed assets increased 9% at December 31, 20242025 as compared to December 31, 2023,2024, primarily from an increase in money market and equity assets. Total average money market assets increased 15%9% for 20242025 compared to 2023.2024. Period-end money market assets increased 13%8% at December 31, 20242025 as compared to December 31, 2023.2024. The Federal Reserve loweredimplemented thea federalseries fundsof three rate threecuts, times beginningstarting in September,September settling2025, landing at a range of 4.25%3.5% to 4.5%3.75% inby December,December 2025, and U.S. money market funds reached a record high at nearly $7$8.2 trillion. Money market funds continued to offer a yield advantage compared to some securities in the direct market, especially overnight securities and those with floating rates, which trace the Federal Reserve moves immediately. Average equity assets decreasedincreased 2%11% for 20242025 as compared to 2023.2024. Period-end equity assets remainedincreased flat23% at December 31, 20242025 as compared to December 31, 20232024 primarily due to market appreciation nearlyand, completelyto offseta bylesser extent, net redemptions.sales. The S&P 500 finished the year up more than 21%,16%, aidedas bytech stocks continued to drive returns, although market breadth improved late in the tech stocks, which benefited from the artificial intelligence boom.year. Average fixed-income assets increased 9%3% for 20242025 as compared to 2023.2024. Period-end fixed-income assets increased 3%2% at December 31, 20242025 as compared to December 31, 20232024 primarily due to market appreciation.appreciation, partially offset by net redemptions. Overall, fixed-income markets haddelivered asolid volatileperformance in 2025, with most fixed-income asset classes offering gains. Throughout the year, with yields surging late in 2024 on concerns over a potential reacceleration of inflation. Yields on the 10-Year Treasury note increasedtraded fromin 3.9%a atrange thebetween starta low of 3.97% and a high of 4.79%, closing the year toat above4.18%, 4.5%slightly bylower than the year’syear-end end.2024 level. Average alternative/private markets assets decreased 4% for 20242025 as compared to 2023.2024. Period-end alternative/private markets assets decreasedincreased 8%1% at December 31, 20242025 as compared to December 31, 20232024 primarily due to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, partially offset by net redemptions.
Revenue. Revenue increased $22.5$168.6 million in 20242025 as compared to 20232024 primarily due to (1) increases in money market and fixed-incomeequity revenue of $85.0$106.5 million and $9.6$36.0 million, respectively, primarily related to higher average assets. These increases were partially offset by (1) a decrease in carried interest of $50.0 million (partially offset in Compensation and Related expense) andassets (2) decreasesan increase in equityperformance and alternative/private markets revenuefees of $9.4$7.9 million and $6.5(3) million,an respectively,increase duein toreal lowerestate averagedevelopment assets.fees of $7.8 million.
Federated Hermes’ ratio of revenue to average managed assets was 0.20%0.21% and 0.23%0.20% for 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively. The decreaseincrease in the rate was primarily due to the decreasechange in carriedthe interestmix andof aasset decreaseclasses of money market assets in revenue from lower average equity assets during 20242025 as compared to 2023.2024.
Operating Expenses. Total operating expenses for 2025 increased $16.2 million compared to 2024. Distribution expense increased $52.1 million primarily related to higher average money market fund assets. Compensation and Related expense increased $37.2 million primarily due to higher incentive compensation and merit increases. Systems and Communications expense increased $5.9 million primarily due to increased technology initiatives. Intangible Asset Related expense decreased $65.6 million primarily due to the $66.3 million impairment of an indefinite-lived intangible asset in 2024 associated with the 2018 acquisition of FHL (see Note (9) to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information). Other expense decreased $16.1 million primarily due to a value added tax (VAT) refund received in 2025 related to amended VAT filings in the U.K. ($12.9 million) and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates ($10.2 million).
Operating Expenses. Total operating expenses for 2024 increased $48.6 million compared to 2023. Intangible Asset Related expense increased $65.5 million primarily due to an impairment of an indefinite-lived intangible asset (see Note (9) to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information). Distribution expense increased $11.1 million primarily related to higher average managed money market fund assets. Compensation and Related expense decreased $22.9 million primarily due to less carried interest paid as compensation of $32.1 million partially offset by increases due to higher compensation related to merit and staffing increases of $11.3 million. Other expense decreased $18.2 million primarily due to a decrease in the costs associated with a fund restructuring in 2023.
Nonoperating Income (Expenses). Nonoperating Income (Expenses), net decreasedincreased $3.6$13.5 million in 20242025 as compared to 2023.2024. The decreaseincrease is primarily due to a $6.6$14.5 million decreaseincrease in Gain (Loss) on Securities, net due primarily to a smallerlarger increase in the market value of investments in 20242025 as compared to 2023. This decrease was partially offset by a $3.5 million increase in Investment Income, net primarily due to anthe increase in the yieldmarket onvalue of investments duein to rising interest rates and higher cash and cash equivalents balances.2024.
Income Taxes. The income tax provision for 20242025 and 20232024 was $113.2$133.4 million and $106.6$113.2 million, respectively. The provision for 20242025 increased $6.6$20.2 million as compared to 20232024 primarily due to an increase in U.S. income tax resulting from increased U.S. pre-tax income. The effective tax rate was 24.4% for 2025 and 29.7% for 2024 and 25.9% for 2023.2024. The increasedecrease in the effective tax rate was primarily due to the resultimpact in 2024 of a valuation allowance on foreign deferred tax assets and the impairment of an indefinite-lived intangible asset (2.3%), and a state law change and a state deferred tax adjustment (0.8%).asset. See Note (15) to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the effective tax rate, as well as other tax disclosures.
Pillar Two legislation has been enacted in certain jurisdictions in which Federated Hermes operates. The legislation iswas effective for the financial year beginning January 1, 2024. Federated Hermes is in scope of the enacted legislation and has performed an assessment of its potential exposure to Pillar Two income taxes based on the most recent tax filings, country-by-country report and financial statements for the constituent entities of Federated Hermes. Based on the assessment, for fiscal yearyears 2025 and 2024 Federated Hermes expects to be able to rely on the transitional safe harbor for each of the jurisdictions in which it operates. As a result, Federated Hermes does not expect a material exposure to Pillar Two income taxes in those jurisdictions. This assessment will continue to be monitored and updated as additional guidance and/or legislation is released.
Net Income Attributable to Federated Hermes, Inc. Net income decreasedincreased $30.7$135.0 million in 20242025 as compared to 20232024 primarily as a result of the changes in revenue, operating expenses, nonoperating income (expenses) and income taxes noted above. Diluted earnings per share for 20242025 decreasedincreased $0.17$1.90 as compared to 20232024 primarily due to decreasedincreased net income ($0.35$1.63), partiallyand, offsetto a lesser extent, by a decrease in shares outstanding resulting from share repurchases ($0.18$0.27).
At December 31, 2024,2025, Federated Hermes’ liquid assets included investments in certain money market and fluctuating-value Federated Hermes Funds that canmay have direct and/or indirect exposures to international sovereign debt and currency risks. Federated Hermes continues to actively monitor its investment portfolios to manage sovereign debt and currency risks with respect to certain European countries, China and certain other countries subject to economic sanctions. Federated Hermes’ experienced portfolio managers and analysts work to evaluate credit risk through quantitative and fundamental analysis. Further, regarding international exposure, certain money market funds (representing approximately $468$558 million in AUM) that meet the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act (Rule 2a-7) or operate in accordance with requirements similar to those in Rule 2a-7, include holdings with indirect short-term exposures invested primarily in high-quality international bank names that are subject to Federated Hermes’ credit analysis process.
Cash Provided by Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $297.3 million for 2025 as compared to $346.6 million for 2024. The decrease of $49.3 million was primarily due to (1) a net increase of $117.5 million in cash paid for trading securities for 2025 as compared to 2024, (2) an increase in cash paid related to the $52.1 million increase in Distribution expense previously discussed and (3) an increase of $17.7 million in cash paid for incentive compensation for 2025 as compared to 2024. These increases in cash paid were partially offset by an increase in cash received related to the $168.6 million increase in revenue previously discussed.
Cash Provided by Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $346.6 million for 2024 as compared to $311.8 million for 2023. The increase of $34.8 million was primarily due to (1) an increase in cash received related to the $22.5 million increase in revenue previously discussed, (2) a $17.9 million payment made in 2023 representing a settlement with affected shareholders related to an administrative error (see Note (20) to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information) and (3) a net decrease of $5.8 million in cash paid for trading securities for 2024 as compared to 2023. These increases were partially offset by an increase of cash paid for taxes of $17.2 million.
Cash Provided by Investing Activities. In 2024,2025, net cash provided by investing activities was $64.3$2.0 million which primarily represented $119.9$42.2 million in cash received from redemptions of Investments—Affiliates and Other, partially offset by $47.5(1) $18.7 million paid for purchases of Investments—Affiliates and Other.Other, (2) cash paid for the Rivington acquisition, net of cash acquired ($12.8 million) and (3) cash deposits made on a fixed asset to be acquired in 2026 ($6.0 million).
Cash Used by Financing Activities. In 2024,2025, net cash used by financing activities was $286.4$237.9 million. Of this amount, Federated Hermes paid (1) $184.8 million or $2.21 per share in dividends to holders of its common shares, (2) $137.6$262.8 million to repurchase shares of Class B common stock primarily in connection with its stock repurchase programs (see Note (14) to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information), (2) $104.9 million or $1.33 per share in dividends to holders of its common shares and (3) $31.3$35.4 million of distributions to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries. This activity was partially offset by $69.1$163.9 million of contributions from noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries.
On July 30, 2021, Federated Hermes entered into an unsecured Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Federated Hermes, certain of its subsidiaries as guarantors party thereto, a syndicate of eleven banks as Lenders party thereto, PNC Bank, National Association as administrative agent, PNC Capital Markets LLC, as sole bookrunner and joint lead arranger, Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., as joint lead arranger, Citibank, N.A. as syndication agent, and Toronto-Dominion Bank, New York Branch as documentation agent (Credit Agreement). The Credit Agreement consists of a $350 million revolving credit facility with an additional $200 million available via an optional increase (or accordion) feature. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement may be used for general corporate purposes including cash payments related to acquisitions, dividends, investments and share repurchases. As of December 31, 2024,2025, Federated Hermes hashad $350 million available to borrow under the Credit Agreement. See Note (11) to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Both the Note Purchase Agreement and the Credit Agreement have certain stated events of default and cross default provisions which would permit the lenders/counterparties to accelerate the repayment of debt outstanding if not cured within the applicable grace periods. The events of default generally include breaches of contract, failure to make required loan payments, insolvency, cessation of business, notice of lien or assessment,assessment and other proceedings, whether voluntary or involuntary, that would require the repayment of amounts borrowed.
Future Cash Needs. In addition to the contractual obligations described above, management expects that principal uses of cash will include funding business acquisitions (including the FCP acquisition disclosed in Note (3)) and global expansion, funding distribution expenditures, paying incentive and base compensation, paying shareholder dividends, paying debt obligations, paying taxes, repurchasing company stock, developing and seeding new offerings, modifying existing offerings and relationships and maintaining regulatory liquidity and capital requirements. In addition, Federated Hermes expects to invest approximately $280$300 million (including the allocation of approximately $190$200 million in existing technology-related overhead, primarily the compensation expense of existing employees and an external spend of approximately $90$100 million) over the next three years to support a number of planned technology-driven initiatives. Any number of factors canmay cause Federated Hermes’ future cash needs to increase. As a result of the highly regulated nature of the investment management business, management anticipates that aggregate expenditures for compliance and investment management personnel, compliance systems and technology and related professional and consulting fees couldcan continue to increase.
Investments—Consolidated Investment Companies at December 31, 20242025 increased $11.9$3.1 million from December 31, 20232024 primarily due to (1) an increase of $55.5$22.4 million related to the consolidation of two variable interest entities (VIEs) in 2024.2025, This(2) an increase wasof $13.8 million related to net purchases on existing consolidated products and (3) an increase of $4.9 million due to foreign exchange rate fluctuations. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $40.2$38.2 million related to the deconsolidation of two voting rights entities (VREs)VIEs in 2024.2025.
Investments—Affiliates and Other at December 31, 20242025 decreasedincreased $52.8$2.1 million from December 31, 20232024 primarily due to a decrease of $72.5 million in net redemptions, partially offset by an increase of $16.9$11.6 million related to the deconsolidation of atwo VREVIEs which reclassified Federated Hermes' investments into Investments—Affiliates and Other.Other and an increase of $9.6 million in net appreciation on existing investments. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $20.3 million in net redemptions.
Receivables—AffiliatesReceivables, net at December 31, 2025 decreased $22.4 million from December 31, 2024 primarily due to (1) the reclassification of the $15.9 million insurance reimbursement receivable (see Note (20) to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information) from short-term to long-term due to delays in the litigation and (2) the 2025 receipt of performance fees accrued at December 31, 2024 decreased $12.4 million from December 31, 2023 primarily due to a decrease in investment advisory and administrative service fees ($5.3 million) and the 2024 receipt of carried interest earned in 2023 ($4.4$6.8 million).
Other Long-Term Assets at December 31, 2025 increased $20.9 million from December 31, 2024 primarily due to the reclassification of the $15.9 million insurance reimbursement receivable noted above (see Note (20) to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information) from short-term to long-term due to delays in the litigation.
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses at December 31, 2024 increased $11.7 million from December 31, 2023 primarily due to an accrual for proxy costs related to a change in fund directors ($6.2 million) and an increase in accrued distribution fees due primarily to higher average managed money market fund assets ($4.8 million).
Accrued Compensation and Benefits at December 31, 20242025 decreasedincreased $1.3$19.3 million from December 31, 20232024 primarily due to the 20232025 incentive compensation accruals recorded at December 31, 2025 ($151.4 million), partially offset by 2024 accrued annual incentive compensation being paid in the first quarter 20242025 ($129.4 million), partially offset by 2024 incentive compensation accruals recorded at December 31, 2024 ($127.4$133.0 million).
Indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment at the accounting unit level annually as of OctoberDecember 1,31, or when indicators of a potential impairment exist. Federated Hermes has combined certain indefinite-lived assets into three distinct units of accounting for impairment testing purposes. The factors considered in determining the asset grouping include, among others, the highest and best use of the assets and the inseparable nature of the cash flows. Such asset grouping determination is reconsidered annually and may change depending on the facts and circumstances. Federated Hermes’ current indefinite-lived intangible assets’ units of accounting are: (1) FHL right to manage public fund assets; (2) Hermes trade name; and (3) all other rights to manage fund assets. Management may use a qualitative or quantitative approach which requires the weighting of positive and negative evidence collected through the consideration of various factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset or asset group is impaired. During the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, management used both qualitative and quantitative approaches. For the quantitative analyses, management used an income-based approach to valuation, the discounted cash flow method. Management considers macroeconomic and entity-specific factors, including projected AUM, projected revenue growth rates, projected pre-tax profit margins, tax rates, discount rates and, in the case of a trade name valuation, a royalty rate. In addition, management reconsiders on a quarterly basis whether events or circumstances indicate that a change in the useful life has occurred. Indicators of a possible change in useful life monitored by management generally include changes in the expected use of the asset, a significant decline in the level of managed assets, changes to legal, regulatory or contractual provisions of the rights to manage fund assets, the effects of obsolescence, demand, competition and other economic factors that could impact the funds’ projected performance and existence, and significant reductions in underlying operating cash flows.
As of June 30, 2024, due to actual results trailing projected results, driven by a combination of lower gross sales and higher redemptions management concluded that an indicator of potential impairment existed for the FHL right to manage public fund assets. The discounted cash flow analysis resulted in a non-cash impairment charge of £52.2 million ($66.3 million).
As of December 31, 2024,2025, due to a decrease in near term projected cash flows, primarily driven by a decrease in AUMprojected as a result of net redemptions,revenue, management concluded that an indicator of potential impairment existed for the indefinite-lived intangible asset related to the FHL right to manage public fund assets, which had a carrying value of £72.2 million ($90.4$97.3 million). A discounted cash flow analysis was prepared which resulted in the estimated fair value exceeding the carrying value by moreless than 15%.5%. The key assumptions in the discounted cash flow analysis include revenue growth rates, pre-tax profit margins and the discount rate applied to the projected cash flows. The risk of future impairment increases with a decrease in projected cash flows and/or an increase in the discount rate.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, assuming all other assumptions remain static, an increase or decrease of 10% in projected revenue growth rates would result in a corresponding change to estimated fair value of approximately 10%.9%. An increase or decrease of 10% in pre-tax profit margins would result in a corresponding change to estimated fair value of approximately 17%.16%. An increase or decrease in the discount rate of 25 basis points would result in an inverse change to estimated fair value of approximately 3%. Market volatility and other events related to geopolitical or other unexpected events couldin the future can further reduce the AUM, revenues and earnings associated with thisFederated Hermes’ indefinite-lived intangible assetassets and can result in subsequent impairment tests being performed based upon updated assumptions and future cash flow projections, which can result in an impairment. For additional information on risks related to geopolitical or other unexpected events, see Item 1A – Risk Factors – SpecificGeneral Risk Factors – Other General Risks Related to Federated Hermes’ Investment Management Business and Offerings – Potential Adverse Effects of TerminationUnpredictable Events or Failure to Renew Advisory Agreements.Consequences.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
There are no material changes to the risk factors included in Federated Hermes’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.
No wording changes found in this section.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “State Actions Relating to Governance, Environmental and Social Factors and Proxy Advisory Firms.”
New heading “1) A Separate Account was reclassified from Multi-Asset to Equity effective October 1, 2025.”
Largest changes
“State Attorneys General Probe Governance, Environmental and Social Factor Influence in Credit Rating Practices. …”see in full comparison
“EU Regulation of Governance. Environmental and Social Ratings. The European Commission published regulations during the second quarter 2026 regarding the implementation of governance, environmental and social ratings in the EU. …”see in full comparison
“This case follows last year’s Spence v. American Airlines litigation (in which a plaintiff successfully argued that their employer breached their ERISA duty of loyalty by allowing corporate interests in governance, environmental and social objectives to influence the management of an employee retirement plan) and represents the second recent ERISA lawsuit involving governance, environmental and social-related theories of fiduciary breach, though the claims arise from the alleged failure to account for climate risk rather than from the use of governance, environmental and social-focused …”see in full comparison
“EU and U.K. Regulation of Governance, Environmental, or Social Ratings. The framework for the regulation of providers of governance, environmental and social ratings in the EU and U.K. continues to be developed. In the EU, on January 20, 2026, the European Commission published two draft delegated regulations supplementing the regulation on the transparency and integrity of governance, environmental and social rating activities. …”see in full comparison
“DOL Proposes Safe Harbor for Alternative Assets in 401(k) Plans. On March 31, 2026, the DOL issued proposed rules establishing a safe harbor framework that allows for the inclusion of alternative assets, such as private market investments, in 401(k) plans. …”see in full comparison
“U.K. and EU Money Market Fund Reform. In the U.K., on May 14, 2026, as an update to a 2023 consultation paper, HM Treasury and the FCA published a joint statement expressing their commitment to reforming the U.K. money market fund regulatory regime (MMFR). The FCA subsequently published a statement on June 8, 2026, stating certain updated proposals that differ from those in the 2023 consultation paper. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (131)
Federated Hermes is a global leader in active investing with $907.1$911.6 billion in managed assets as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026. The majority of Federated Hermes’ revenue is derived from advising Federated Hermes Funds and Separate Accounts in domestic and international public and private markets. Federated Hermes also derives revenue from providing administrative and other fund-related services (including distribution and shareholder servicing) as well as stewardship, real estate development and renewable energy project development services.
Investment advisory fees, administrative service fees and certain fees for other services, such as distribution and shareholder service fees, are contract-based and are generally calculated as a percentage of the average net assets of managed investment portfolios. Federated Hermes’ revenue is primarily dependent upon factors that affect the value of managed/serviced assets, including market conditions and the ability to attract and retain assets. Generally, managed assets in Federated Hermes’ public market investment products and strategies (together with other offered services, as applicable, offerings) can be redeemed or withdrawn at any time with no advance notice requirement, while managed assets in Federated Hermes’ private market investment offerings are subject to restrictions on withdrawals. Fee rates for Federated Hermes’ services generally vary by asset and service type and can vary based on changes in asset levels. Generally, advisory fees charged for services provided to multi-asset and equity offerings are higher than advisory fees charged to alternative/private markets and fixed-income offerings, which in turn are higher than advisory fees charged to money market offerings. Likewise, Federated Hermes Funds typically have higher advisory fees than Separate Accounts. Similarly, revenue is also dependent upon the relative composition of average AUM across both asset and offering types. Federated Hermes can implement Fee Waivers such as Voluntary Yield-related Fee Waivers, to maintain certain fund expense ratios, to meet regulatory requirements or to meet contractual requirements. Since Federated Hermes’ public market offerings are largely distributed and serviced through financial intermediary customers, Federated Hermes makes payments, out of its reasonable profits and other resources, to the financial intermediary customers that sell these offerings. These payments are generally calculated as a percentage of net assets attributable to the applicable financial intermediary and represent the vast majority of Distribution expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Certain components of Distribution expense can vary depending upon the asset type, distribution channel and/or the size of the customer relationship. Federated Hermes generally pays out a larger portion of the revenue earned from managed assets in money market, multi-asset,market and fixed-incomemulti-asset funds than the revenue earned from managed assets in fixed-income, equity and alternative/private markets funds.
The business and regulatory environmentsenvironment in which Federated Hermes operates globally remainremains complex, uncertain and subject to change. Federated Hermes and its investment management business are subject to extensive regulation, both within and outside of the U.S., including various laws, rules and regulations globally that impose restrictions, limitations, registration, reporting and disclosure requirements on its business, and add complexity to its global compliance operations. For example, Federated Hermes and its offerings are subject to various: (1) federal securities laws, such as the Securities Act of 1933,1933 (1933 Act), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act), the Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act), and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (Advisers Act); (2) state laws regarding fraud and registration; and (3) regulations or other rules promulgated by various regulatory authorities, or other authorities. These regulatory requirements, and other regulatory developments, continue to impact the investment management industry generally and will continue to impact, to various degrees, Federated Hermes’ business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and stock price (collectively, Financial Condition).
Please see Federated Hermes’ prior public filings, including the discussions under Part I, Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis – Business Developments – Current Regulatory Developments, in Federated Hermes’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2026 (First Quarter 2026 Form 10-Q), and Part I, Item 1 – Business – Regulatory MattersMatters, in Federated Hermes’ Annual Report on Form 10‑K10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025,2025 (2025 Annual Report), for an overview of Federated Hermes’ regulatory environment and related regulatory developments and requirements for periods prior to March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025.2025, respectively.
Federated Hermes’ and its offerings’The primary regulator in the U.S. for Federated Hermes and its offerings is the SEC. U.S. regulatory matters addressed in Federated Hermes’ 2025 Annual Report and First Quarter 2026 Form 10-Q included, among others: (1) the regulatory impact resulting from the current Presidential administration, which has fundamentally redirected the SEC away from expansive regulation and aggressive enforcement to emphasizing deregulation, capital formation and “back-to-basics” investor protection; (2) SEC enforcement trends and examination priorities; (3) the Financial Stability Oversight Council’s (FSOC) priorities for 2026, which are primarily focused on deregulation and promoting economic growth; (4) the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s (FINRA) regulatory operations programs, including FINRA’s key areas of focus for 2026; and (5) SEC proposed amendments to Form N-PORT and the Names Rule compliance dates; (6) scrutiny of governance, environmental and social initiatives, including state laws governing proxy advisory services; (7) the FSOC’s proposed interpretive guidance on systemically important financial institution (SIFI) designations; (8) the Department of Labor’s (DOL) proposed rules establishing a safe harbor framework that would allow for the inclusion of alternative assets, such as private market investments, in 401(k) plans; (9) the SEC’s enforcement results for its 2025 fiscal year; and (10) certain other specific regulatory developments involving the SEC, the Department of Labor (DOL),DOL, and other regulators.
Key regulatory developments and requirements in the U.S. since DecemberMarch 31, 2025,2026, that can significantly impact or relate to Federated Hermes’ business and offerings include, among others, the following. Unless otherwise noted, Federated Hermes is evaluating the impact of the matters described on its business and offerings.
Electronic Delivery Rule Proposal. On July 16, 2026, the SEC proposed Regulation E-Delivery, a new rule that would: (1) expand the ability of issuers, market intermediaries, and others to use electronic delivery to satisfy requirements to deliver required regulatory information under the federal securities laws; (2) provide requirements and conditions for delivering regulatory information electronically to investors and others without first obtaining their affirmative consent; and (3) generally supersede the SEC’s decades-old, guidance-based e-delivery approach, which the SEC traces to a 1995 interpretive release. Under the proposal, investors would retain the ability to request paper delivery, and, if a recipient requests a paper copy of information during a specified period, it is required to be retained under the federal securities laws and an issuer would generally have to send a paper copy, free of charge, within three business days of the request. To facilitate this new e-delivery approach, the SEC also proposed to: (1) rescind 1940 Act Rule 30e-3, (which provides alternative means for registered investment companies to satisfy shareholder report transmission requirements); and (2) amend current rules addressing the dissemination of proxy materials and tender offer materials. The proposal is intended to modernize the delivery-method rulebook applicable across the SEC’s regulated entities, without altering the content or format requirements for existing disclosures. The public comment period for this proposal will end on September 21, 2026.
SEC Publishes Agency Rule List – 2026 (2026 Reg. Flex Agenda). On July 3, 2026, the SEC released its 2026 Reg. Flex Agenda, which was originally produced on May 14, 2026, and included two pre-rule items, 36 proposed rule items, and no final rule items. In a July 7, 2026 statement regarding the 2026 Reg. Flex Agenda, the SEC Chairperson stressed that the SEC recognizes: (1) the importance of advancing the regulatory framework to reflect today’s operating environment by embracing innovation and technology; (2) the importance of reversing the decline of public companies and revitalizing public markets; and (3) the need to ensure a regulatory framework for private markets that is transparent and accessible while remaining safeguarded. Each item from the SEC’s Division of Investment Management is designated as “deregulatory,” reflecting the SEC Chairperson’s strategy for advancing regulatory frameworks into the modern era, clarifying jurisdictional lines, and transforming SEC rules by returning them to first principles. In addition to the electronic delivery rule proposal discussed above, the 2026 Reg. Flex Agenda includes a number of items relating to registered investment advisors and funds, including, among others: (1) proposed amendments to Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-5 (the Pay to Play Rule); (2) Advisers Act recordkeeping modernization; (3) Advisers Act and 1940 Act custody rule amendments, including proposals for crypto-assets; (4) proposed rules to facilitate retail and registered fund access to private markets; (5) 1940 Act Rule 17a-7 amendments to restore fixed income cross-trading; (6) a proposed exemptive rule to permit funds to use an affiliated securities lending agent that can be compensated via a share of securities lending revenue, subject to certain conditions; and (7) various proxy rule amendments. The 2026 Reg. Flex Agenda no longer includes a proposal for a registered investment advisor and exempt reporting advisor customer identification program.
SEC Chairperson Announces Comprehensive Review of SEC Enforcement Processes. On July 1, 2026, the SEC Chairperson announced that the SEC will conduct a sweeping review of its enforcement processes, describing the review as only the second such comprehensive evaluation in the SEC’s history. Speaking at the Economic Club of New York, the SEC Chairperson stated that the SEC has “ended the regulation by enforcement approach of the past and recentered [its] enforcement program on the SEC’s core mission by prioritizing cases that provide meaningful investor protection and strengthen market integrity.” The announcement follows a period of significant change at the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, including the appointment of David Woodcock as Enforcement Director on May 4, 2026, who has emphasized a shift away from case volume in favor of prioritizing quality and “back-to-basics” principles. Effective May 21, 2026, the SEC also rescinded a long-standing (since 1972) policy codified in its rules of informal procedure that provided that, when the SEC chose to settle an enforcement action in which a sanction was imposed, the SEC would not settle unless the defendant or respondent also agreed not to publicly deny the allegations in the complaint or administrative order. The SEC Chairperson also previously articulated a four-year strategic blueprint highlighting his intentions to shift regulatory practices and enforcement and improve operational efficiency, with the SEC’s Division of Enforcement focusing on fraud and manipulation. These developments are consistent with the broader deregulatory direction of the current Presidential administration discussed in Federated Hermes’ prior public filings.
DOL Submits Proposed Rule on Prudence and Loyalty in Plan Investments and Shareholder Rights. On June 30, 2026, the DOL submitted a proposed rule titled “Prudence and Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising Shareholder Rights” to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under the regulatory review process. While the title of the proposed rule does not use the term “ESG,” the rulemaking is expected to address the permissible factors that Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) plan fiduciaries may consider when making investment decisions or exercising proxy voting and other shareholder rights on behalf of retirement plans. The proposed rule follows the current administration’s broader efforts to revisit the prior administration’s 2022 rule, which facilitated the consideration of governance, environmental and social factors in ERISA-governed investment decisions, and is consistent with recent DOL enforcement signals and guidance - including Technical Release 2026-01 (discussed below) and Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) head Daniel Aronowitz’s May 8, 2026 remarks (discussed below) - emphasizing that ERISA fiduciaries must act solely in the economic interest of plan participants and beneficiaries.
Supreme Court Rules That Section 47(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 Provides No Private Right of Action. On June 11, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held 6-3 in FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd. that 1940 Act Section 47(b) does not create a private right of action for rescission of contracts that violate the 1940 Act. The Court held that Section 47(b)’s phrase “rescission at the instance of any party” does not imply that private parties may sue. The Court concluded that Section 47(b)’s provision is a “mandate directed to … courts” and does not confer a right to individuals. The Court’s decision reaffirms the SEC’s central role in enforcing - or exempting investment companies from - the 1940 Act and reduces the risk that private suits will undermine the SEC’s enforcement priorities. The decision is a setback for activist investors that are now foreclosed from suing for contract rescission under the 1940 Act to prevent exchange-listed closed-end funds and other issuers from adopting safeguards, like control share provisions, designed to protect the interests of long-term shareholders. The Court’s decision reduces the exposure of registered investment companies and their advisors to private litigation alleging violations of the 1940 Act, though the full implications will depend on how lower courts apply the decision.
SEC Division of Examinations (DOE) Issues Risk Alert on Investment Adviser Conflicts of Interest. On June 9, 2026, the SEC’s DOE issued a Risk Alert describing observations related to SEC-registered investment advisors’ economic conflicts of interest. The Risk Alert, which echoes topics in the DOE’s 2026 Examination Priorities, emphasizes the fiduciary obligations of investment advisors to identify, disclose and manage economic conflicts of interest. The Risk Alert addresses five key areas of concern: (1) conflicts of interest associated with investment advisors’ cash management recommendations, including automatic sweeps of uninvested cash into interest-bearing accounts without enabling informed client consent and undisclosed revenue-sharing arrangements; (2) conflicts of interest associated with other revenue opportunities, including the selection of higher-cost mutual fund share classes when lower-cost share classes were available; (3) compensation-related misstatements or omissions in Form ADV brochures, including failures to disclose industry activities, affiliations and revenue-sharing arrangements; (4) advisory fee calculations that were inconsistent with agreements and disclosures, including charging for services not provided and failing to issue refunds upon early termination; and (5) compliance programs that did not fully address fee-related economic conflicts, including the lack of controls to ensure accurate billing. The SECs DOE noted that examination findings often resulted in investment advisors returning money owed to clients due to fee billing and calculation errors and encouraged investment advisors to routinely review and refine their billing policies, procedures, practices and conflict disclosures.
SEC Proposes to Rescind Climate-Related Disclosure Rules. On May 29, 2026, the SEC proposed to rescind, in their entirety, the climate-related disclosure rules that the SEC had adopted in March 2024 but stayed pending litigation in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. The SEC stated that the 2024 rules exceeded the SEC’s statutory authority and, independently, reflected unsound policy because they were inconsistent with a registrant-specific, materiality-based approach to disclosure. If adopted, the proposed rescission would eliminate the 2024 rules’ specific line-item climate disclosure requirements, (covering climate-related risks, governance, targets and certain greenhouse gas emissions) rather than replace them with an alternative climate-specific framework, reverting public companies to existing principles-based and materiality-based disclosure obligations regarding climate matters. The proposal does not affect separate, non-SEC climate-related disclosure obligations that may apply to public (and private) companies under California law (including SB 253 and SB 261, discussed below) or other state, federal or non-U.S. regimes. The public comment period on the proposed rescission ends on August 3, 2026 and, because a subsequent vote of the SEC’s Commissioners would be required, a final rule is not expected before late 2026 or early 2027.
SEC Proposes Sweeping Changes to Filer Status Framework and Executive Compensation Disclosure. On May 19, 2026, the SEC proposed a simplified two-classification system for public reporting companies, replacing the existing five filer categories with two: (1) non-accelerated filer (NAF); and (2) large-accelerated filer (LAF). Under this proposal, a public company will be categorized as an NAF unless it satisfies specified public float and time requirements (at least $2 billion and 60 consecutive months of Exchange Act reporting). The public float threshold would need to be satisfied for two consecutive fiscal years before transition to LAF status. Every company conducting an initial public offering, regardless of public float, will benefit from a minimum five-year on-ramp as an NAF. While Federated Hermes would not benefit from the proposal because it would continue to qualify as a LAF, if final rules are adopted as proposed, NAFs’ compensation disclosure obligations will be significantly reduced. NAFs would be required to provide compensation disclosure for only three (rather than five) executive officers, a summary compensation table for up to two (rather than three) fiscal years, an outstanding equity awards table and a director compensation table. The proposal would eliminate for NAFs the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A), the grants of plan-based awards table, the option exercises and stock vested table, pension benefits and non-qualified deferred compensation tables, pay ratio and pay versus performance disclosures, say-on-pay advisory votes, golden parachute tables, the compensation committee report and compensation committee interlock disclosures. The proposal follows the SEC Chairperson’s January 2026 statement instructing the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance to undertake a comprehensive review of Regulation S-K, as discussed in Federated Hermes’ First Quarter 2026 Form 10-Q. The public comment period for this proposal ended on July 20, 2026.
SEC Proposes Sweeping Reforms to the Registered Offering Process, Including for Closed-End Funds (CEFs) and Business Development Companies (BDCs). On May 19, 2026, the SEC proposed a broad package of rule and form amendments under the 1933 Act intended to modernize and expand issuer eligibility for shelf registration, well-known seasoned issuer (WKSI) benefits, and related communications safe harbors. As proposed, the amendments would extend enhanced registration and communication benefits - including short-form Form N-2 eligibility (without regard to the current $75 million public float requirement), automatic shelf registration for certain qualifying issuers, and an expanded Rule 139b research-report safe harbor without a minimum public float requirement - to BDCs and registered closed-end funds, including exchange-listed CEFs, that register securities on Form N-2. The public comment period for this proposal ended on July 27, 2026.
DOL Signals Targeted Enforcement on ESG/DEI in 401(k)s. The DOL’s EBSA has signaled a more pointed enforcement approach toward retirement plan fiduciaries engaging in governance, environmental and social or diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI)-related investing. Speaking on May 8, 2026, EBSA head Daniel Aronowitz emphasized that the agency will prioritize action against “bad faith” actors who misappropriate plan assets or pursue “disloyal” objectives collateral to participant benefits, explicitly identifying governance, environmental and social and DEI motivations as potential red flags. The remarks build on recent agency guidance pivoting away from broad fiduciary-prudence inquiries and coincide with efforts to revisit prior administration rules that facilitated governance, environmental and social investment options in 401(k)s.
SEC Proposes Optional Semiannual Reporting for Public Companies. On May 5, 2026, the SEC proposed rule and form amendments that would give public companies the option of filing semiannual reports on a new Form 10-S in lieu of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Companies that elect semiannual reporting would file one semiannual report and one annual report each fiscal year instead of three quarterly reports and one annual report. The election would be made annually on the cover page of Form 10-K; companies that do not affirmatively elect would continue to file quarterly. Form 10-S would require the same disclosures as Form 10-Q - including reviewed financial statements, management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A), legal proceedings, risk factor updates and executive officer certifications - but for a six-month period. Companies electing semiannual reporting could continue to issue quarterly earnings releases and hold quarterly earnings calls, though such information would not be subject to independent accountant review. The SEC Chairperson described the proposal as part of his agenda to incentivize companies to go and stay public. On July 6, 2026, Federated Hermes submitted a comment letter recommending that the SEC maintain mandatory quarterly reporting requirements and, instead, streamline Forms 10-K and 10-Q to focus on the most decision-useful, material disclosures - including financial statements and MD&A - by eliminating or reducing prescriptive and immaterial disclosure requirements that do not meaningfully inform investors. The public comment period for this proposal ended on July 6, 2026.
SEC and Commodity Futures TradingTrade Commission (CFTC) Propose Amendments to Form PF. On April 20, 2026, the SEC and CFTC proposed amendments to Form PF to: (1) eliminate filing requirements for smaller advisors by raising the Form PF filing threshold for all filers from $150 million in private fund assets under managementAUM to $1 billion in private fund assets under managementAUM and raising the reporting threshold for large hedge fund advisors from $1.5 billion in hedge fund assets under managementAUM to $10 billion in hedge fund assets under managementAUM; (2) eliminate certain reporting requirements for smaller hedge fund advisors; and (3) eliminate, streamline and simplify certain other reporting requirements by, among other proposed changes, eliminating certain “look through” requirements, eliminating certain performance volatility reporting requirements, simplifying certain large hedge fund counterparty exposure reporting, eliminating certain current reporting for large hedge fund advisors, and eliminating quarterly event reporting for all private equity fund advisors. SEC-registered investment advisors that satisfy Form PF’s filing thresholds must file Form PF, which is intended to provide the SEC, CFTC and FSOC with confidential information about the operations and strategies of private funds and their investment advisors. The proposed amendments would repeal certain enhanced reporting requirements promulgated by the SEC in 2024. The public comment period for thethis proposedproposal amendmentsended willon endJune 6023, days after the proposed amendments are published in the Federal Register.2026.
SEC Publishes Concept Release on Consolidated Audit Trail and Other Audit Trails and Data Sources. On April 16, 2026, the SEC published a concept release soliciting comments in support of a comprehensive review of the Consolidated Audit Trail and other audit trails and related data sources currently used in the regulation of U.S. securities markets, including comments regarding the funding mechanisms for these audit trails and/or related data sources. The Consolidated Audit Trail is a centralized, SEC‑mandatedSEC-mandated system that collects and links detailed data on all orders, quotes and trades across U.S. equity and options markets that purports to enable regulators to efficiently surveil, reconstruct and investigate market activity. The public comment period willfor end 60 days after thethis concept release isended publishedon inJune the22, Federal Register.2026.
FINRA Proposes Amendments to Rules 5130 and 5131 to Exempt Collective Trust Funds (CTFs). On April 7, 2026, FINRA filed a proposed rule change to amend FINRA Rule 5130, (Restrictions on the Purchase and Sale of Initial Equity Public Offerings) and paragraph (b) (Spinning) of FINRA Rule 5131, (New Issue Allocations and Distributions) to exempt specified CTFs. The proposed amendments would modernize the new issue rules, which generally prohibit FINRA member firms from selling new issues to accounts in which certain “restricted persons” (such as broker-dealers, their employees, finders, and certain others) have a beneficial interest, unless an exemption applies, by extending an exemption to specified CTFs, consistent with the treatment of registered investment companies. As proposed, a CTF would be eligible for the exemption if: (1) it has investments from 1,000 or more plan participants and beneficiaries; and (2) it was not formed or maintained for the specific purpose of permitting restricted persons to invest in new issues. The public comment period for this proposal ended on May 1, 2026.
SEC Announces Enforcement Results for Fiscal Year 2025. On April 7, 2026, the SEC announced enforcement results for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2025. During fiscal year 2025, the SEC filed 456 enforcement actions, including 303 standalone actions and 69 “follow-on” administrative proceedings seeking to bar or suspend individuals from certain functions in the securities markets based on criminal convictions, civil injunctions or other orders, and obtained orders for monetary relief totaling $17.9 billion. The total fiscal year 2025 enforcement actions represented a 22% decrease from fiscal year 2024. The 2025 enforcement actions addressed a broad range of misconduct and prioritized cases involving direct harm to investors and the integrity of the U.S. securities markets, including offering frauds, market manipulation, insider trading, issuer disclosure violations and breaches of fiduciary duty by investment advisors. The SEC Chairperson commented that the SEC’s new enforcement emphasis represents an end to “regulation by enforcement” and is aimed at misconduct that creates the greatest harm to investors.
Texas Stock Exchange Propose(TXSE) Proposes to Exempt Closed-End Funds (CEFs) from Requirement to Hold Annual Shareholder Meetings. On April 6, 2026, the Texas Stock Exchange (TXSE) filed a proposed rule change with the SEC, SR TXSE 2026-005, establishing listing and continued listing standards for CEFs and interval funds on its new exchange. As part of this proposal, the TXSE proposed to eliminate the exchange-level requirement that listed CEFs hold annual shareholder meetings. The TXSE proposal follows the Cboe Global Markets Inc. (Cboe) withdrawal on December 12, 2025 of its May 20, 2025 proposal that would have exempted newly-listed CEFs from the requirement to hold annual shareholder meetings and, subject to shareholder approval, also would have exempted previously listed CEFs from the annual shareholder meeting requirement, and the New York Stock Exchange withdrawal on January 5, 2026 of a similar June 6, 2025 proposal. Federated Hermes fullysubmitted supportsa comment letter on July 2, 2026, supporting efforts to eliminate annual shareholder meetings for exchange listed CEFs. In Federated Hermes’ view, CEFs are more akin to registered mutual funds, which are not required to have annual meetings, than listed operating companies and the annual shareholder meeting requirement subjects them to attack by activist shareholders who buy discounted shares and then take action to force the CEFs to incur liquidity eventsevents, (such as tender offers, reorganizations or open-ending of the CEFs) to realize or arbitrage the difference between the discounted purchase price and the CEFs’ NAV, all to the detriment of the CEFs and their long-term investors.
DOL Clarifies Fiduciary Status of Proxy Advisory Firms and Reinforces ERISA Standards on Proxy Voting. On April 1, 2026, the DOL published Technical Release 2026-01, providing guidance to plan administrators and other fiduciaries of plans subject to ERISA that rely on proxy advisory services, as well as to state legislators regulating proxy advisory services. The Release addresses two key issues. First, the Release clarifies that proxy advisory firms that either exercise authority or control over shareholder rights attributable to shares that are ERISA plan assets, including the voting of proxies, or provide advice for a fee to ERISA plans about how such plans should exercise proxy voting rights, must meet ERISA’s functional fiduciary requirements. This appears to be the first time the DOL has explicitly stated that the exercise of discretionary authority over the management of proxy voting rights could, standing alone, render a person or entity a fiduciary under ERISA. Prior DOL guidance had long recognized that proxy voting itself is a fiduciary act because proxy rights are plan assets, which implied that a party exercising discretion over those rights could become a functional fiduciary, but the DOL had not previously issued guidance on the fiduciary status of proxy advisory firms. Indeed, in announcing the Release, the DOL described the guidance as “first-of-its-kind guidance” addressing circumstances in which proxy advisory firms may satisfy the test for fiduciary status under ERISA. Second, the Release addresses ERISA preemption, opining that where a state law mandates disclosure to investors by proxy advisory firms only when they make recommendations other than for the purpose of maximizing risk-adjusted return for the advisee, such laws are generally not preempted by ERISA. The DOL stated that “[a] proxy advisory firm covered by such a law is not permitted to come within its ambit when providing services to an ERISA plan because ERISA imposes even stronger consumer protections in the form of fiduciary protections, including a bar on taking into account anything other than the exclusive purpose of providing benefits to participants and beneficiaries by maximizing risk-adjusted returns - since such a law creates an obligation to provide disclosure only when offering nonfinancial advice (that is, advice based on considerations other than maximizing risk-adjusted returns).”
State Actions Relating to Governance, Environmental and Social Factors and Proxy Advisory Firms.
State Proxy Advisor Disclosure Laws. Several states have enacted laws modeled on Texas S.B. 2337 (2025) that regulate proxy advisor firms that provide certain recommendations involving governance, environmental and social factors or diversity, equity and inclusion factors. For instance, Indiana (H.B. 1273), Kentucky (S.B. 183), Kansas (S.B. 375), and Oklahoma (H.B. 4429), each enacted proxy advisor disclosure laws similar to Texas S.B. 2337. The two largest proxy advisory firms have filed federal lawsuits challenging the Indiana, Kansas, and Kentucky laws on First Amendment grounds, alleging the disclosure requirements constitute viewpoint discrimination because they impose burdens only when the proxy advisor’s recommendation disagrees with management’s position. On June 24, 2026 and June 26, 2026, two federal courts issued preliminary injunctions preventing the Kansas and Indiana laws, respectively, from going into effect on July 1, 2026. These injunctions follow a similar preliminary injunction issued in Texas in 2025. In July 2026, the Kentucky Attorney General agreed with one of the two largest proxy advisory firms not to enforce its proxy advisor disclosure law against it pending the outcome of an injunction hearing.
Separately, on May 20, 2026, four Republican state Attorneys General - Texas, Nebraska, Iowa, and West Virginia -filed state court consumer protection lawsuits against one of the two largest proxy advisory firms alleging the firm failed to disclose that its voting recommendations prioritize governance, environmental and social policies over clients’ financial interests. These lawsuits follow a similar suit filed by Florida in November 2025. On May 26, 2026, the state Attorneys General also announced the formation of a 16-state “Multistate Proxy Advisor Coalition” to coordinate enforcement efforts against the proxy advisory firm.
California Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act Update. On June 24, 2026, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) announced that the first reporting deadline under the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (SB 253) would be extended from August 10, 2026 to November 10, 2026, providing covered entities, including certain investment advisors and fund complexes doing business in California (such as Federated Hermes), additional time to prepare Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions disclosures. Enforcement of the related Climate-Related Financial Risk Act (SB 261) remains stayed pending the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s ongoing review of a preliminary injunction against that statute.
State Attorneys General Probe Governance, Environmental and Social Factor Influence in Credit Rating Practices. On April 22, 2026, a coalition of 23 Republican state Attorneys General, co-led by Alaska, Florida, Nebraska, and Texas, sent letters to Fitch Ratings, Moody’s Investors Service, and S&P Global Ratings alleging that the agencies’ downgrades of fossil fuel companies were based on speculative governance, environmental and social predictions that “materially contravened” their stated methodologies and reflect undisclosed conflicts of interest tied to their commitments to United Nations-backed initiatives. The coalition demanded that the agencies explain or reverse the downgrades, withdraw from or disclose their governance, environmental and social commitments, revise methodologies to remove transition-risk factors, and cease offering governance, environmental and social advisory services to entities they also rate. The coalition warned that failure to act could result in enforcement under state unfair and deceptive acts or practices laws, antitrust investigations, or referral to the SEC and Department of Justice. On May 20, 2026, a group of eight Democratic state and local finance officials - including the state treasurers of Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Colorado - sent a counter-letter urging the agencies to maintain “independent, forward-looking” risk frameworks, arguing that the Republican demands would “narrow risk analysis in ways inconsistent with sound credit practice and the needs of investors and issuers.”
Oklahoma Fossil Fuel Boycott Law Found Unconstitutional. On April 7, 2026, the Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled 5-3 in Keenan v. Russ that the Oklahoma Energy Discrimination Elimination Act of 2022 is “unconstitutional in its entirety when applied to the Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement System” (OPERS), upholding a 2024 district court injunction. The law required the Oklahoma Treasurer’s Office to maintain a list of financial companies that boycott energy companies and directed state entities to divest from them. The court held that the law violated Article 23, Section 12 of the Oklahoma Constitution by creating an impermissible “dual purpose” for investment decisions that interfered with OPERS’s constitutional duty to act solely in the interest of participants and beneficiaries, noting that companies on the restricted list controlled approximately 64% of the system’s assets. The Chief Justice of the Oklahoma Supreme Court dissented on the merits, arguing the Constitution expressly delegates to the Legislature the authority to prescribe investment conditions. The ruling is part of a broader pattern of judicial resistance to state anti-governance, environmental and social boycott laws, following a February 2026 federal court decision striking down a similar Texas law on First and Fourteenth Amendment grounds, with potential implications for comparable statutes in other states.
DOL Proposes Safe Harbor for Alternative Assets in 401(k) Plans. On March 31, 2026, the DOL issued proposed rules establishing a safe harbor framework that allows for the inclusion of alternative assets, such as private market investments, in 401(k) plans. The proposal responds to a Presidential executive order and would provide legal protections for plan sponsors that follow a defined fiduciary process when evaluating and selecting investments, without regard to whether the asset is “traditional” or an “alternative.” Under the proposal, fiduciaries would be required to assess six factors in making investment decisions: performance, fees, liquidity, valuation, benchmarks and complexity. The proposal emphasizes an asset‑neutral, process‑driven approach, allowing selection of higher‑fee or less‑liquid options if these characteristics are justified by anticipated returns and overall value to participants. Industry stakeholders widely supported the proposal, noting that a formalized fiduciary‑process safe harbor may reduce Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) litigation risk and expand access to private‑market strategies. The public comment period for the proposed rule ends on June 1, 2026.
Scrutiny of Governance, Environmental and Social Initiatives. Recent state, federal and legal actions highlight continuing scrutiny of governance, environmental and social framework-aligned investment strategies and climate disclosure groups.
State Laws Governing Proxy Advisors. Two states have recently enacted laws like Texas S.B. 2337, which was enacted in 2025 to regulate proxy advisor firms that provide recommendations involving governance, environmental and social factors or diversity, equity and inclusion factors. For instance, on March 31, 2026, the Kentucky General Assembly passed S.B. 183, which is intended to provide transparency and accountability standards for proxy advisory firms that influence shareholder voting decisions. S.B. 183 requires disclosure by covered firms in two circumstances. First, if a proxy advisor provides a service that isn’t based solely in the financial interests of shareholders. This disclosure must explain that the advice is based in whole or in part on nonpecuniary factors and briefly describe the rationale. Second, if a proxy advisor gives materially different advice to different clients (e.g., suggests to one client to vote “for,” while suggesting to another client to vote “against” or “abstain”). This disclosure requires notice of the materially different vote and clarification as to which of the conflicting voting suggestions are provided solely in the interest of shareholders and supported by an economic analysis.
On March 3, 2026, the State of Indiana enacted Indiana House Bill 1273, which has an effective date of July 1, 2026. Indiana House Bill 1273 imposes one multi-layered disclosure requirement and applies broadly to proxy advisors providing services to any person located in Indiana with respect to a proxy vote pertaining to an entity (i.e., an issuer) even if the entity is out-of-state. The disclosure requirement is triggered if a proxy advisor recommends voting against management (including if the “recommendation” is based upon a default policy). The disclosure must state whether the recommendation is backed by a written financial analysis (and state the analysis is available upon request). The proxy advisor must also provide a copy of the analysis to entity management. If there is no supporting financial analysis, a proxy advisor must disclose this fact to the client and the entity plus make the disclosure publicly available. On April 13, 2026, an investor services and proxy advisory company filed a lawsuit against the Indiana Attorney General in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana challenging the constitutionality of Indiana House Bill 1273. Among other things, the complaint argues that Indiana House Bill 1273 violates free speech by targeting only anti-management recommendations and asks the court to grant a preliminary injunction preventing the law from coming into effect.
New ERISA Fiduciary Breach Lawsuit. In a complaint filed on March 3, 2026 in the U. S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, a participant in a 401(k) plan of a global commercial real estate firm alleges that plan fiduciaries breached their ERISA duties by selecting and retaining an investment fund that failed to consider or manage climate-related financial risks, resulting in excessive risk, inferior performance and higher fees for participants. A core theory of the complaint is that climate change presents financially material risks to investment portfolios, and that these are precisely the types of risks ERISA requires fiduciaries to prudently evaluate and monitor.
This case follows last year’s Spence v. American Airlines litigation (in which a plaintiff successfully argued that their employer breached their ERISA duty of loyalty by allowing corporate interests in governance, environmental and social objectives to influence the management of an employee retirement plan) and represents the second recent ERISA lawsuit involving governance, environmental and social-related theories of fiduciary breach, though the claims arise from the alleged failure to account for climate risk rather than from the use of governance, environmental and social-focused investment strategies. Together, these cases highlight how climate and governance, environmental and social issues are increasingly appearing in ERISA litigation involving defined contribution plan investment menus.
FSOC Proposes Interpretive Guidance and Request for Public Comment on Systemically Important Financial Institutions (SIFI) Designations. On March 25, 2026, the FSOC issued proposed interpretive guidance, and request for public comment, regarding its process for identifying, assessing and responding to potential risks to U.S. financial stability, including through potential designation of nonbank financial companies as SIFI’s. The proposal would rescind the FSOC’s 2023 guidance and restore the structure of the guidance initially issued in 2019 regarding the procedural processes and substantive analytic framework used by the FSOC in considering a nonbank financial company for potential designation. The proposed guidance would re‑establish a two‑step activities‑based approach under which the FSOC would first work with primary regulators to address identified risks before considering a firm‑specific designation. The proposed guidance would also update the FSOC’s analytic methodologies by expanding the set of vulnerabilities considered, such as asset‑valuation risks and broader measures of economic security. Additionally, the proposal would enhance analytical rigor by requiring a cost‑benefit analysis and an assessment of the likelihood of a firm’s material financial distress before designation, while introducing a pre‑designation “off‑ramp” that identifies steps a company or its regulators could take to mitigate risks. The SEC Chairperson indicated support for the proposal but cautioned that it cannot resolve what he views as structural deficiencies in the nonbank designation framework, emphasizing that only Congress can address the underlying issues. On April 15, 2026, Federated Hermes submitted a comment letter to the FSOC expressing: (1) Federated Hermes continued belief that the FSOC’s 2023 guidance was substantively and procedurally defective and should be withdrawn; and (2) the inappropriateness of nonbank SIFI designation of mutual funds generally and particularly money market funds because designating mutual funds generally and particularly money market funds under Section 113 of The Dodd‑Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) is inconsistent with the statutory text and in direct conflict with the stated intent of Congress in adopting the Dodd-Frank Act. The public comment period for the proposal ends on May 14, 2026.
SEC Issues Exchange Act Exemptive Relief to Supplement 1940 Act Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) Share Class Relief for Multi-Class Funds. On March 17, 2026, the SEC issued exemptive relief under the Exchange Act to a number of applicants providing broker-dealer and market structure relief necessary to permit open-end management investment companies registered under the 1940 Act to functionally operate when offering one class of ETF shares that operates as an exchange-traded fund and one or more classes of shares that are not exchange-traded. The relief granted under Exchange Act Section 36 allows broker‑dealers and other market participants to engage in transactions in ETF share classes without triggering restrictions under Rules 10b‑10, 14e‑5, or Section 11(d)(1) of the Exchange Act, provided that the ETF share class operates in accordance with existing ETF requirements. This action follows earlier relief under the 1940 Act enabling registered investment companies to offer both mutual fund and ETF share classes within the same portfolio. As of March 17, 2026, approximately 100 applications had been filed requesting exemptive relief to operate multi‑class ETF structures. Federated Hermes is still evaluating whether to file a similar application.
SEC and CFTC Issue Joint Interpretive Release on Crypto Assets. On March 17, 2026, the SEC and CFTC issued a joint final rule and interpretive release clarifying that most crypto assets are not securities and providing guidance on when transactions involving crypto assets are securities transactions. The interpretive release, which became effective on March 23, 2026: (1) establishes a five-part token taxonomy for crypto assets based on their characteristics, uses and functions, and analyzes each category under the “security” definition; (2) addresses how a non-security crypto asset may become subject to, and cease to be subject to, an “investment contract;” and (3) clarifies the application of federal securities laws to certain crypto activities including airdrops, protocol mining, protocol staking and the “wrapping” of a non-security crypto asset, consistent with existing SEC staff guidance. While most crypto assets are not themselves securities under the new guidance, the SEC reiterates its view that a non-security crypto asset may be sold as part of an “investment contract” (and, therefore, become subject to the securities laws) depending on the representations and promises made to purchasers to undertake future managerial efforts. The interpretive release also provides guidance as to when a crypto asset that was initially offered and sold as part of an investment contract may cease to be subject to an investment contract.
SEC Proposes to Limit Rule 15c2-11 to Equity Securities. On March 16, 2026, the SEC proposed amendments to Exchange Act Rule 15c2‑11 that would formally limit the rule’s scope to equity securities, replacing all references to “securities” with “equity securities” as defined in Exchange Act Rule 3a11‑1. Rule 15c2‑11 historically required broker‑dealers to gather and review specified issuer information before publishing quotations in an over-the-counter (OTC) quotation medium, a framework originally designed to combat fraud in thinly traded OTC equity markets. The SEC noted that the proposal responds to several years of industry feedback following the staff’s unexpected 2021 interpretation that the rule extended to fixed‑income securities, contrary to decades of market practice. Under the proposed amendments, fixed‑income instruments and other non‑equity securities would no longer fall within the rule’s requirements, though convertible bonds, warrants, options and forwards linked to equity securities would continue to be treated as equity securities and remain subject to Rule 15c2‑11. The SEC also proposes conforming changes to recordkeeping and information‑review provisions and clarifies that the amended rule would apply to crypto assets only to the extent a particular crypto asset qualifies as an “equity security” under Rule 3a11‑1. The SEC stated that the amendments are consistent with the rule’s original anti‑fraud purpose and would remove outdated exceptions, such as the municipal‑securities exemption, which become unnecessary if the rule is limited solely to equity securities.
Second Circuit Rejects Reliance on SEC Definition of Investment Advisor in Enforcement Action. On February 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Second Circuit) issued a summary order in SEC v. Amah holding that courts must independently interpret the statutory definition of “investment advisor” under the Advisers Act and may not defer to the SEC’s interpretation simply because the statutory text is ambiguous. The SEC had argued that an individual’s “expectation” of receiving compensation could satisfy the statutory requirement that an advisor receive compensation, even if no compensation was actually paid by the allegedly defrauded investors. Traditionally, the SEC has advanced this view through guidance and rulemaking preambles. The Second Circuit rejected this approach, emphasizing that the Supreme Court’s ruling under Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo requires courts to exercise their own judgment when a statute lacks judicial construction.
In SEC v. Amah, the Second Circuit vacated a district court decision imposing liability on an investment advisor under the Advisers Act because the district court appeared to treat the SEC’s interpretation as controlling without analyzing whether the statutory definition is consistent with the SEC’s expansive interpretation. The ruling is among the first to apply the ruling from Loper Bright in the SEC enforcement context, citing that judges may not defer to agency interpretation just because a statute is ambiguous. The Second Circuit decision signals that the SEC must be prepared to ground its interpretations more firmly in statutory text and provides defendants with an avenue to challenge even long‑standing agency positions.
SEC Adopts Final Amendments for Foreign Private Issuers Holding Foreign Insiders Accountable Act (HFIAA). On February 27, 2026, the SEC adopted final amendments implementing the HFIAA, eliminating the longstanding exemption that previously shielded directors and officers of foreign private issuers (FPIs) from Section 16(a) reporting obligations. As a result, directors and officers of FPIs with a class of equity securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act must begin filing Forms 3, 4 and 5 to disclose their beneficial ownership and transactions in the issuer’s equity securities starting March 18, 2026. The final amendments revise Rule 3a12‑3(b) to remove the full exemption from Section 16 and replace it with exemptions only from Section 16(b) short‑swing profit rules and Section 16(c) short‑sale prohibitions and amend Rule 16a‑2 to continue excluding 10% beneficial owners of FPIs from Section 16(a) reporting.
The SEC also updated Forms 3, 4 and 5 to include optional fields for foreign trading symbols and more precise address information to better accommodate foreign insiders. In a related action on March 5, 2026, the SEC issued an exemptive order allowing FPI insiders in certain qualifying jurisdictions, including Canada, Chile, the European Economic Area, Korea, Switzerland and the U.K., to satisfy Section 16(a) obligations through home‑country filings if those regimes provide substantially similar reporting. These amendments collectively align foreign‑issuer insider reporting obligations more closely with those applicable to U.S. domestic companies.
CFTC Staff Preserves Commodity Pool Operator (CPO) Delegation Structures Relief. On February 26, 2026, the CFTC’s Market Participants Division issued an updated no‑action position confirming that CPO delegation structures may remain intact even when a CPO that has been delegated CPO responsibilities by a non-registrant relies on recent no‑action relief and is therefore no longer registered as a CPO. This clarification addresses uncertainty created by earlier relief that allowed certain registered CPOs to deregister; market participants questioned whether a non-registrant could continue delegating regulatory responsibilities if the CPO was no longer formally registered, as previously required under CFTC No‑Action Letter 14‑126.
The updated CFTC position makes clear that a non-registrant does not need to register so long as (1) it delegates CPO responsibilities to a CPO relying on the new relief (i.e., a non‑registered CPO); and (2) all other conditions of No‑Action Letter 14‑126 remain satisfied, such as the CPO accepting full responsibility for CPO obligations and the non-registrant not engaging in solicitation or management activities. This ensures that long‑standing delegation arrangements for private funds, including those involving offshore fund boards or general partners, are not unintentionally disrupted by the deregistration of the CPO and that fund complexes may continue operating under pre‑existing, CFTC‑sanctioned delegation models.
Initial Implementation Regulation Adopted for California Climate Disclosure. On February 26, 2026, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) approved initial implementing regulations for the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (SB 253) and the Climate‑Related Financial Risk Act (SB 261). The regulations establish applicability criteria, fee structures, reporting timelines and key definitions, marking the first formal regulatory framework for California’s mandatory climate‑disclosure regime. CARB confirmed that entities are considered to be “doing business” in California if they are organized or commercially domiciled in the state or if their California sales exceed a threshold set by the Franchise Tax Board. The regulations also adopt a flat‑fee structure for covered companies, with program fees allocated based on total annual program costs divided by the number of regulated entities.
The first reporting deadline under SB 253 is August 10, 2026, and applies initially only to Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse‑gas emissions, with Scope 3 reporting beginning in 2027. CARB clarified that insurance companies, nonprofits, government entities and certain limited‑activity businesses are exempt from reporting requirements. Although the regulations also apply to SB 261, CARB emphasized that enforcement of SB 261 remains stayed pending ongoing Ninth Circuit litigation, and the agency will not enforce SB 261 until the injunction is lifted. CARB noted that these implementing rules advance California’s broader effort to standardize climate‑risk disclosure and align the state with similar global frameworks adopted in the EU, U.K. and Japan.
SEC Overhauls Enforcement Manual. On February 24, 2026, the SEC Division of Enforcement announced the first substantial overhaul of its Enforcement Manual since 2017, adopting changes designed to make enforcement proceedings more efficient, transparent and less punitive for cooperative parties. The revised manual restores a prior policy that allows simultaneous SEC consideration of an offer of settlement and related waiver requests from automatic disqualifications and other collateral consequences from the settlement terms. This change reduces the likelihood of duplicative “follow‑on proceedings,” and provides respondents with clearer visibility into the full implications of a proposed settlement. Under the new process, if the SEC accepts the settlement but rejects the waiver request, the respondent must decide whether to proceed with or withdraw the settlement.
The SEC also revised the Wells process, which is the procedure by which potential defendants can provide substantive argument after the Division of Enforcement staff preliminarily decides to recommend that the SEC bring charges. Among other things, the changes standardized a four‑week period for respondents to submit Wells responses and require that any requested Wells meeting occurs within four weeks thereafter, with participation by a senior SEC official. Additional updates aim to incentivize meaningful cooperation: the Division of Enforcement may recommend reduced or waived civil penalties for entities that demonstrate effective self‑policing, self‑reporting, remediation and cooperation, including actions such as enhancing internal controls, taking remedial personnel measures, clawing back compensation and improving training. For individuals, penalty mitigation will consider the quality of assistance provided, the importance of the matter, the public‑interest factors involved and the individual’s personal and professional profile. These updates come amid a noted decline in enforcement‑action volume over the SEC’s past fiscal year and reflect the SEC’s refocused priority on fraud prevention and misconduct that threatens market integrity.
Proposed Amendments to Form N-PORT Reporting; Extension of Compliance Dates for Names Rule Reporting. On February 18, 2026, the SEC proposed amendments to certain registered investment company reporting requirements on Form N-PORT to: (1) provide funds with an additional 15 days to file monthly reports of portfolio-related information; (2) reduce the publication of reports from monthly to quarterly; (3) streamline or remove certain reported information and (4) require certain additional information for funds, including certain identifying information and information about funds with share classes that operate as ETFs. The SEC also extended the compliance dates for amendments to Form N-PORT that relate to the Names Rule to November 17, 2027, for fund groups, such as the Federated Hermes Funds, with net assets of $10 billion or more as of the end of their most recent fiscal year, and to May 18, 2028, for fund groups with less than $10 billion in net assets as of the end of their most recent fiscal year. The public comment period on the proposed Form N-PORT amendments ended on April 24, 2026.
On April 24, 2026, Federated Hermes submitted a comment letter to the SEC regarding the proposed amendments to Form N-PORT. In its comment letter, Federated Hermes strongly supported the proposal and commended the SEC for reassessing the 2024 amendments to Form N-PORT and proposing new amendments designed to reduce reporting burdens without significantly affecting the SEC’s use of the data and the public’s ability to assess relevant information about a fund. Among other comments, Federated Hermes supported: (1) extending the Form N‑PORT filing deadline from 30 days to at least 45 days (preferably 60 days) after month‑end to strengthen accuracy, validation, reliability and internal review processes; (2) restoring the quarterly public disclosure framework for Form N‑PORT information to limit the public release of fund information to the third month of each fiscal quarter because it appropriately mitigates the risk of predatory trading, reverse engineering and front running a fund while preserving transparency for investors; (3) streamlining Form N‑PORT by narrowing portfolio‑level risk metrics, simplifying return reporting, eliminating data elements of limited regulatory or investor utility, and removing the requirement to file a Regulation S‑X‑compliant Schedule of Investments, which is duplicative and costly for funds and their shareholders and (4) eliminating adopted‑but‑not‑yet‑effective reporting items related to the Names Rule compliance and other subjective portfolio classifications that could confuse investors or inadvertently disclose proprietary investment perspectives.
SEC Releases Additional Staff FAQs on the Names Rule. On February 18, 2026, the SEC issued additional FAQs on the Names Rule. The FAQs related to: (1) shareholder notice of certain changes to non-fundamental 80% investment policies; (2) Names Rule’s treatment of unfunded commitments for certain funds; (3) the use of “Growth” or “Value” in certain fund names and (4) the use of “Merger” or “Merger Arbitrage” in fund names.
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) Issues Beneficial Owner Relief. On February 13, 2026, the FinCEN issued Order FIN‑2026‑R001, providing significant exceptive relief from the 2016 Customer Due Diligence (CDD) Rule’s requirement that financial institutions identify and verify the beneficial owners of legal‑entity customers at each new account opening. Instead, institutions may now limit beneficial‑owner identification and verification to three circumstances: (1) at the initial account opening; (2) when facts arise that reasonably call into question the reliability of previously obtained beneficial‑ownership information and (3) as otherwise required under the institution’s risk‑based ongoing CDD procedures. The order further clarifies that when reverification is triggered under a risk‑based program, institutions may rely on previously obtained information so long as the customer certifies or confirms that the information remains current, with institutions required to maintain records of this certification. FinCEN explicitly reaffirmed that all other anti-money laundering obligations and financial crime requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act remain fully in effect, including suspicious‑activity monitoring, risk‑based due‑diligence procedures and internal controls. FinCEN noted that the updated approach aligns more closely with a risk‑based framework while still ensuring that institutions maintain accurate, reliable beneficial‑ownership information and remain vigilant against financial‑crime risks.
FINRA Gifts Rule Increased To $300. On February 12, 2026, the SEC approved and FINRA adopted amendments to FINRA Rule 3220, raising the annual per‑recipient gift limit from $100 to $300 and codifying long‑standing guidance regarding the treatment of gifts and business entertainment. The amendments, which were first proposed by FINRA on May 29, 2025, clarify that while gifts incidental to a business‑entertainment event count toward the $300 limit, the entertainment event itself remains outside the valuation, and ordinary business entertainment, such as meals, sporting events or theater outings, continues to be permissible so long as it is not so frequent or extensive as to raise concerns about propriety. The revised rule also incorporates prior FINRA interpretations and creates a formal exemptive‑relief mechanism, while expressly identifying several categories of exempt gifts, including de minimis items, nominal promotional items with firm logos, deal toys, personal gifts for infrequent life events paid personally by the giver, bereavement gifts and certain disaster‑related donations. These amendments modernize the gift framework, provide clearer compliance parameters and require firms to update supervisory procedures, tracking systems and training programs to align with the new $300 limit and codified exemptions. The amended FINRA Rule 3220 became effective on March 30, 2026.
SEC Chairperson Testifies that the SEC is Open for Certain Additional Money Market Fund Reforms. On February 11, 2026, the SEC Chairperson testified before the U.S. House of Representatives Financial Services Committee in respect of the mandatory redemption fee required under the SEC’s 2023 money market fund reforms that “[a]ll these things are open” and “[y]es, we’re looking at all of these things.” In response to a letter from a member of the Financial Services Committee, the SEC Chairperson indicated that the SEC Staff is working with the fund industry on provisions in Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act that require liquidity fees on institutional prime and institutional municipal (tax-exempt) money market funds when they reach a certain threshold of investor redemptions. Federated Hermes previously submitted letters to the SEC Chairperson on April 28, 2025 and July 11, 2025, in which Federated Hermes expressed its view that the SEC’s adoption of the 2023 amendments to Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act related to the mandatory liquidity fee framework for institutional prime and institutional municipal (tax-exempt) money market funds violated the Administrative Procedures Act and should be repealed. Federated Hermes believes this violation stems from the SEC’s failure to conduct a proper cost-benefit analysis, the establishment of an arbitrary threshold for mandatory liquidity fees, the absence of an analysis of less restrictive alternatives, and the lack of adequate notice and opportunity for public comment.
SEC FAQs on Net Performance and Promotor Disqualification. On January 15, 2026, the SEC published two new FAQs aimed at addressing challenges faced by investment advisors complying with Rule 206(4)-1 under the Advisers Act (Marketing Rule). The Marketing Rule permits investment advisors to calculate net performance applying either actual or model fees. Despite this apparent flexibility in the rule, footnote 590 of the Marketing Rule Adopting Release states that if the fees charged to the intended audience of an advertisement are anticipated to be higher than the actual fees used to calculate net performance, the investment advisor “must use a model fee that reflects the anticipated fee to be charged in order not to violate the rule’s general prohibitions.” The new FAQ clarifies that the guidance in footnote 590 should be interpreted through the lens of the Marketing Rule’s general prohibitions, which are intended to “provide appropriate flexibility and regulatory certainty for investment advisors considering how to market their investment advisory services” and “[i]n applying the general prohibitions, an investment advisor should consider the facts and circumstances of each advertisement.” In the SEC Staff’s view, whether the use of actual fees violates the general prohibitions depends on all the facts and circumstances of a specific advertisement, including, but not limited to, relevant disclosures. The SEC Staff’s view is that investment advisors can use various means to illustrate the effect of differences between actual fees and anticipated fees on performance. This guidance provides welcome relief for investment advisors that have struggled to apply the prescriptive language in footnote 590 to various forms of investment performance. The second FAQ provides guidance on circumstances in which investment advisors can engage certain persons to provide testimonials or endorsements.
SEC Chairperson Issues Statement on Reforming Regulation S-K. On January 13, 2026, the Chairperson of the SEC stated that: “[t]oday, the disclosure that companies provide in response to the myriad requirements of Regulation S-K does not always reflect information that a reasonable investor would consider important in making an investment or voting decision.” Towards the goal of eliminating requirements to disclose “undisputably immaterial information,” the Chairperson has instructed the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance to undertake a comprehensive review of Regulation S-K. He noted that this process began in May 2025, with the solicitation of public comments on the executive compensation disclosure requirements of Regulation S-K, Item 402. The SEC Staff is evaluating the comments received with respect to Item 402 of Regulation S-K and is preparing revision recommendations. The SEC will now focus on the other Regulation S-K disclosure requirements “with the goal of revising the requirements to focus on eliciting disclosure of material information and avoid compelling the disclosure of immaterial information.” As part of this effort, the SEC requested that public comments be submitted by April 13, 2026. Federated Hermes submitted a comment letter expressing, among other comments, its support for modernizing Regulation S-K to ensure that registrants provide clear, decision-useful and material disclosures while avoiding unnecessary reporting burdens.
Outside the U.S., the primary regulators of Federated Hermes’Hermes and its offerings’ primary regulatorsofferings include the United Kingdom (U.K.) Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the Central Bank of Ireland,Ireland (CBI), the Luxembourg Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier, the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority, the Monetary Authority of Singapore and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. Federated Hermes and its offerings are subject to various non-U.S. regulatory requirementsrequirements, and may be impacted by regulatory developments by or involving those primary regulators, as well as, among others, the European Commission, European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), Bank of England (BoE), His Majesty’s Treasury (HM Treasury) in the U.K.,, Financial Stability Board,Board (FSB), and the International Organization of Securities Commissions.Commission (IOSCO). Non-U.S. regulatory matters addressed in Federated Hermes’ 2025 Annual Report and First Quarter 2026 Form 10-Q included, among others: (1) moneykey marketregulatory fundpriorities reformidentified by regulators in the U.K. and European Union (EU); (2) formoney EUmarket Undertakingsfund for the Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS), potential changes to the eligible assets requirements; (3) changes to liquidity risk management requirementsreform in the U.K. and EU; (43) the U.K. FCA’s final rules on consumer composite investments (CCI) and the disclosure requirements for CCIs; (5) the steps being taken to shift to a T+1 settlement cycle in the U.K. and EU changes to liquidity risk management requirements; (64) EUU.K. and U.K.EU sustainability requirements for asset managers and investment offerings; (75) EUU.K. and U.K.EU sustainability reporting requirements for corporations; (6) U.K. and EU anti-money laundering requirements; (7) EU reforms to enhance the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR); (8) theU.K. and EU Savingsregulation of governance, environmental and Investmentssocial Unionratings; (SIU9) the transition to the T+1 settlement in the U.K. and RetailEU; Investmentand Strategy(10) the retail investment strategy (RIS). in the EU.
Key regulatory developments outside the U.S. since DecemberMarch 31, 20252026 that can significantly impact or relate to Federated Hermes’ business and offerings include, among others, the following. Unless otherwise noted, Federated Hermes is evaluating the impact of the matters described on its business and offerings.
U.K. Reform of Alternative Investment Fund Manager Directive (AIFMD) regime, and reform of reporting and remuneration requirements for U.K. asset managers (including Alternative Investment Fund Managers (AIFMs)). On July 14, 2026, HM Treasury published a draft Statutory Instrument and Policy note setting out a new, simplified legislative framework for governing AIFMs, repealing existing legislation governing AIFMs, and providing for the detailed regulation of AIFMs to be addressed in FCA rules. On July 14, 2026, the FCA also published a consultation paper on the new regime for AIFMs (CP26/28 - The U.K. AIFM Regime), as well as consultation papers impacting asset managers generally on reporting requirements (CP26/26 - Fund Reporting for Asset Management Entities (FRAME)) and remuneration requirements (CP26/27 - Remuneration: Solo-regulated Firms’ Rules Reform). In these consultation papers, among other things: (1) the FCA proposes replacing the current U.K. AIFMD-derived framework with a new, standalone rulebook - the Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) sourcebook (ALTS) - and introduces a three-tier system that classifies AIFMs as small (under £750m NAV), medium (£750m–£5bn NAV), or large (over £5bn NAV), with obligations scaling proportionately by size; (2) the FCA sets out a proposed new reporting framework covering the thresholds, frequency, time to report, and scope of the regime, along with its approach to leverage, master and feeder funds, and calculation methodologies that AIFMs would need to follow; and (3) the FCA proposes changes to the remuneration code applicable to solo-regulated asset managers, aiming to simplify and modernize pay-related rules that currently derive largely from the AIFMD, tailor applicable remuneration requirements more proportionately by firm size, and reduce compliance burdens for smaller managers while preserving standards for larger, more systemically significant firms. The public consultation periods for these papers end on October 14, 2026, September 22, 2026, and September 16, 2026, respectively.
FHI insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 9 filings (5 insiders, 8 trade dates, 39,237 shares, about $2.3M). Net open-market shares: -39,237 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$2.3M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-20 | Germain Peter J |
Open-market sale | 5,000 | $63.17 | $315.9K |
| 2026-08-04 | Nusseibeh Saker Anwar |
Open-market sale | 630 | $64.76 | $40.8K |
| 2026-08-04 | Nusseibeh Saker Anwar |
Open-market sale | 6,400 | $64.19 | $410.8K |
| 2026-06-23 | Van Meter Stephen |
Open-market sale | 1,682 | $59.64 | $100.3K |
| 2026-06-16 | Uhlman Paul A |
Open-market sale | 6,145 | $58.67 | $360.5K |
| 2026-06-08 | Nusseibeh Saker Anwar |
Open-market sale | 8,950 | $57.34 | $513.2K |
| 2026-05-26 | Germain Peter J |
Open-market sale | 409 | $55.31 | $22.6K |
| 2026-05-26 | Uhlman Paul A |
Open-market sale | 1,021 | $55.31 | $56.5K |
| 2026-05-18 | Donahue Thomas R |
Gift | 31,200 | — | — |
| 2026-05-15 | Germain Peter J |
Open-market sale | 5,000 | $54.30 | $271.5K |
| 2026-05-07 | Burke Bryan M |
Open-market sale | 4,000 | $54.20 | $216.8K |
| 2026-05-04 | Uhlman Paul A |
Grant/award | 40,000 | — | — |
| 2026-05-04 | Burke Bryan M |
Grant/award | 35,000 | — | — |
| 2026-05-01 | Jones Marie Milie |
Grant/award | 2,000 | — | — |
| 2026-05-01 | Hanlon Karen |
Grant/award | 2,000 | — | — |
| 2026-05-01 | Bartolacci Joseph C |
Grant/award | 2,000 | — | — |
Well-known investors holding FHI (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 2,460,945 | $135.9M | 0.05% | Reduced 5% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 982,725 | $54.3M | 0.03% | Added 2992% |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 329,300 | $18.2M | 0.03% | Added 11% |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 96,168 | $5.3M | 0.0% | Reduced 78% |
| Bridgewater Associates | 2026-06-30 | 29,155 | $1.6M | 0.01% | Reduced 80% |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 27,503 | $1.5M | 0.0% | Reduced 48% |