Companies › FLNA

FLNA 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

Filana Therapeutics, Inc. · Nasdaq · Pharmaceutical Preparations · CIK 1069530 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from Filana Therapeutics, Inc.'s public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

16 / 27risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
5new risk-factor headings
2Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-03-12 (period ending 2025-12-31) with 10-K filed 2025-03-03 (period ending 2024-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

16new paragraphs
27removed paragraphs
48reworded paragraphs
28,567 → 26,714words in section

New heading “The FDA has placed a full clinical hold on our planned clinical studies, which may cause our business to suffer.”

New heading “We may not be able to obtain orphan drug exclusivity for our product candidates in the United States or the European Union.”

New heading “Our inability to develop formulations of simufilam appropriate for pediatric patients under the age of 12 could delay or prevent clinical trials of simufilam in that population.”

New heading “Governmental actions with respect to U.S. drug prices could negatively impact our business.”

New heading “Our application to register our new corporate name as a trademark may be denied, which could adversely affect our business.”

Removed heading “The FDA may not accept data from Phase 3 clinical trials conducted in foreign locations.”

Removed heading “The FDA or other regulatory agencies may put a clinical hold on our clinical studies, which would cause our business to suffer.”

Removed heading “We have never obtained FDA approval for a diagnostic test and we may not be able to secure such approval in a timely manner or at all.”

Removed heading “If we do not compete effectively with scientific and commercial competitors, we may not be able to successfully develop our diagnostic test for Alzheimer’s disease.”

Removed heading “We will need to find alternative approaches that do not involve antibodies to advance our SavaDx and our diagnostic program.”

Removed heading “Our Phase 2 clinical studies with simufilam are generally not designed to show a statistically meaningful difference in cognition or other health functions between those patients who receive placebo and those who receive drug.”

Removed heading “To the extent that our open-label study suggested differences in treatment effects by stage of disease, such observations may or may not replicate in any of our subsequent clinical studies.”

Removed heading “U.S. intellectual property rights around diagnostic methods is a complex, evolving area of law and effective patent claims may not be available to us for our investigational diagnostic product candidate, SavaDx, in the United States.”

Removed heading “The validity of aspects of the Company’s Phase 2b Study has been called into question.”

Removed heading “Our Workforce Reduction may result in operational and strategic challenges.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Reworded topics: investigation, litigation, lawsuit, penalt

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

We also are defending ourselves in aseveral number ofcivil lawsuits, including Anti-SLAPP, securities class action and shareholder derivative actions,actions. andThe the Company, as well as two former senior employeesdefense of thethese Company, have been and may continue to be subject to governmental investigations and inquiries. Defending litigation and responding to governmental investigationsmatters is expensive and time consuming and may divert the time and attention of our management away from the conduct of our primary business. Such litigation is inherently uncertain, and we cannot predict the timing, outcome, or impact of these lawsuits, including whether they will be resolved through settlement or adverse judgment. Any such resolution could involve substantial monetary damages, penalties, or other remedies, as well as reputational harm, even if we ultimately prevail. The costs associated with defending these actions, together with any unfavorable outcome, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and stock price. Moreover, the allegations underlying such litigation and governmental investigations have damaged our business reputation, which may make it difficult to, among other things: raise capital or engage in a strategic transaction on acceptable terms or at all; hire and retain third-party consultants and collaborators; recruit and retain patients for our studies; and attract and retain qualified executive officers, other employees and directors.
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: indictment, investigation
“The Company’s Board empowered an Ad Hoc Investigation Committee (the Committee), comprising independent directors, to direct an investigation (the Internal Investigation) of supplemental information provided by the SEC. As part of an Internal Investigation conducted by the Committee, the Committee evaluated information contained in the DOJ indictment of Dr. Wang as well as information from the Company’s discussions with the SEC. The Internal Investigation determined that certain statistical information contained in an attachment to an email sent by a former senior employee of Cassava to Dr. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: investigation
“U.S. intellectual property rights around diagnostic methods is a complex, evolving area of law and effective patent claims may not be available to us for our investigational diagnostic product candidate, SavaDx, in the United States.”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: indictment, investigation
“The Internal Investigation did not determine, and may never be able to determine with any reasonable degree of certainty, whether Dr. Wang unblinded himself as to some number of Phase 2b Study participants. Nevertheless, the fact that Dr. Wang possessed information that could have been used to so unblind himself, together with the allegations in the DOJ indictment, undermine the blinded study design and create substantial uncertainty about the validity of the CUNY Bioanalysis of CSF biomarkers.”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: workforce reduction
“Our Workforce Reduction may result in operational and strategic challenges.”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: indictment, labor
“For example, on June 28, 2024, the DOJ announced that a federal grand jury in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland returned an indictment of Dr. Hoau-Yan Wang, a former scientific collaborator and advisor to Cassava. The indictment alleges that Dr. Wang caused Cassava to submit grant applications to NIH that contained false and fraudulent representations about his research. See “—2024 Non-Product Development Business Developments—Indictment of Hoau-Yan Wang.””
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (91)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 6 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

We are developing a therapeutic and diagnostic product candidates,candidate, but to date have no approved products and until 2025 have concentrated substantially all of our resources in recent years on research and development efforts on experimental methods for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. As we advance development of our TSC-related epilepsy product candidate and explore expansion into other therapeutic indications, we expect that we will continue to expend substantial resources on research and development. All of the product candidates that we seek to develop are subject to significant development risk, as the development of new pharmaceutical treatments is inherently risky.

Reworded

Developing and, if approved, commercializing a novel treatment for a central nervous system disorder, such as Alzheimer’s disease or TSC-related epilepsy, subjects us to many challenges, including obtaining regulatory approval from FDA and other regulatory authorities.

Added

The FDA has placed a full clinical hold on our planned clinical studies, which may cause our business to suffer.

Added

A clinical hold is an order issued by FDA or another regulatory agency to suspend an ongoing or planned clinical trial, typically due to newly identified deficiencies with, or the need for additional information regarding, the subject study or drug candidate.

Added

On December 15, 2025, the Company received a formal letter from FDA confirming that our proposed clinical trial is on full clinical hold subject to the Company providing FDA with additional information, including additional pre-clinical data, and modifying the protocol design. The updated timing for initiation of a clinical trial will depend on the Company’s ability to provide the requested information and on satisfactory completion of FDA’s review.

Added

The grounds for imposition of a clinical hold are complex, variable and fact specific. For the current clinical hold, FDA expects us to address the cited deficiencies or provide the requested additional information, in each case, through the submission of a detailed, written response. The clinical hold requires us to spend significant resources to address the root causes of FDA’s concerns. If we were unable to find and successfully address such root causes or if our response were deemed inadequate to lift the clinical hold, this would adversely affect our business. If we are subjected to a clinical hold that remained in effect for one year or longer, the FDA may consider the IND for the affected product candidate to fall into Inactive Status, which may result in termination of the corresponding clinical program.

Added

We are working expeditiously to respond to the FDA’s requests and to lift the hold. To the extent, however, that we are not successful in lifting the current clinical hold imposed by FDA, our results of operations and business will be materially adversely affected.

Reworded

Our lead drug candidate, simufilam, is based ontargets a newscaffolding approachprotein called filamin A. In light of stabilizing—butexisting notresearch, removing—we believe that filamin A is a criticalpromising proteintarget infor thedrug brain.development Wewith respect to TSC-related epilepsy. However, we cannot be certain that our novel technologies will yield clinical results that support the approval of a safe and effective therapeutic product or, if approvable, that such a product will be marketable. In addition, because FDA has limited comparators to evaluate our lead drug candidate, we could experience a longer than expected regulatory review process and increased development costs.

Reworded

Identifying and qualifying patients to participate in clinical studies is critical to the success of the relevant product candidate. The timing of clinical studies depends, in part, on the speed of recruitment of patients to participate in testing such product candidates as well as completion of required follow-up periods. WeFor any study that we initiate, we may not be able to identify, recruit and enroll a sufficient number of patients or patients with required or desired characteristics to achieve the objectives of the study. If patients are unable or unwilling to participate in such studies, the timeline for recruiting patients, conducting studies and obtaining regulatory approval of potential products may be delayed. These delays could result in increased costs, delays in advancing our product candidates, delays in testing the effectiveness of our technology, failure to meet study endpoints or objectives or termination of the clinical studies altogether.

Reworded

Furthermore, our efforts to build relationships with patient communities may not succeed, which could result in delays in patient enrollment in our clinical trials. In addition, any negative results wein may report inprevious clinical trials of our drug candidate may make it difficult or impossible to recruit and retain patients in other clinical trials of that same drug candidate. For example, our enrollment efforts for future clinical trials, regardless of indication, may face headwinds as a result of the failure of our RETHINK-ALZ and REFOCUS-ALZ clinical trial to achieve itstheir primary endpoints.

Reworded

ToWe theface extentparticular thatchallenges we pursuepursuing an indication for simufilam for TSC-related epilepsy, we may face particular challenges.epilepsy. Because TSC is a rare neurological disorder, there are limited patient pools from which to draw in order to complete clinical trials in a timely and cost-effective manner. Identifying and qualifying patients to participate in our clinical trials would be critical to our success in pursuing an indication in TSC for simufilam. The number of patients suffering from TSC is smallapproximately 45,000 people in the United States and has not been established with precision. If the actual number of patients with TSC is smaller than we anticipate, we may encounter difficulties in enrolling patients in our clinical trials, thereby delaying or preventing development and approval of a drug candidate. Even once enrolled we may be unable to retain a sufficient number of patients to complete trials for TSC-related epilepsy.

Reworded

Our business is substantially dependent on our ability to successfully complete clinical development and obtain regulatory approval for simufilam, which may never occur. InUntil recent years,2025, we have invested a significant portion of our efforts and financial resources in the development of simufilam and, to a much lesser extent, SavaDx, for the treatment and detection of Alzheimer’s disease, respectively.disease. We alsoare currently subject to a full clinical hold. If we are successful in our efforts to have the clinical hold lifted, we intend to conduct exploratorya preclinicalproof-of-concept studiesclinical study to better understand simufilam’s potential as a treatment for TSC-related seizures.epilepsy.

Reworded

An unfavorable outcome in one or more of the clinical trials that we conduct would be a major setback for our product candidates and for us and may require us to delay, reduce or re-define the scope of, or eliminate one or more product candidate development programs, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and prospects. For example, on November 25, 2024, we announced that the topline results from our Phase 3 RETHINK-ALZ study of simufilam in Alzheimer’s disease did not meet each of the pre-specified co-primary, secondary and exploratory biomarker endpoints. Following the failure of REITHINK-ALZ, we discontinued our Phase 3 REFOCUS-ALZ study as well as all of our open-label extension studies in Alzheimer’s disease. Following the release of the topline REFOCUS-ALZ results, we intend to evaluate the results and determine the next steps for the future advancement, if any, of its Alzheimer’s program.

Reworded

We have a limited operating history in our business targeting Alzheimer’s disease and TSC-related epilepsy and no history of product approvals for commercial sale, which may make it difficult to evaluate our current business and predict our future success and viability.

Reworded

We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company with a limited operating historyhistory. in ourOur business initially targetingtargeted Alzheimer’s disease through mid-2025 and nowcurrently evaluatingtargets TSC-related epilepsy as a target.epilepsy. Since we commenced operations in 1998, we have had no product candidates approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales. Drug development is a highly uncertain undertaking and involves a substantial degree of risk. To date, we have not completed a successful pivotal Phase 3 clinical study in Alzheimer’s disease or TSC-related epilepsy, obtained marketing approval for any product candidates,candidates or conducted sales and marketing activities necessary for successful product commercialization. Our long operating history as a company without product revenue makes any assessment of our future success and viability subject to significant uncertainty.

Added

We may not be able to obtain orphan drug exclusivity for our product candidates in the United States or the European Union.

Added

We may seek orphan drug designation and orphan drug exclusivity for one or more of our products or product candidates in the United States and the European Union (“EU”), but we may not be successful. Orphan drug designation does not guarantee regulatory approval or market exclusivity, and orphan drug exclusivity—if granted—is available only upon approval for a specific indication and is subject to significant limitations. Regulatory authorities may deny or revoke orphan designation or exclusivity if applicable criteria are not met, including if disease prevalence is higher than anticipated, if our product is not sufficiently differentiated from other therapies, or if a competing product is determined to be clinically superior. Even if orphan drug exclusivity is obtained, it may be limited in scope, apply only to a particular indication, and may not prevent competitors from developing or commercializing alternative therapies. If we are unable to obtain or maintain orphan drug exclusivity, or if such exclusivity is narrower or less valuable than expected, our ability to successfully commercialize our products candidates could be materially adversely affected.

Added

Our inability to develop formulations of simufilam appropriate for pediatric patients under the age of 12 could delay or prevent clinical trials of simufilam in that population.

Added

Our product candidate, simufilam, currently is available only in formulations that may not be appropriate for administration to pediatric patients below the age of 12. The development of age‑appropriate formulations for younger pediatric populations presents significant scientific, regulatory, and manufacturing challenges, and we may be unable to develop such formulations in a timely manner or at all. If we are unable to develop formulations suitable for this patient population, we may be required to delay, limit, or forego future clinical trials in patients under the age of 12, which could adversely affect our development timelines, regulatory strategy, and ability to pursue pediatric indications. Any such delays or limitations could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and prospects.

Reworded

To date, we have invested substantial effort and financial resources to identify, procure intellectual property for, and develop our programs in neurodegeneration and other central nervous system disorders, including conducting preclinical and clinical studies for our product candidates,candidate, simufilam and SavaDx,simufilam, and providing general and administrative support for these operations. Our future success is dependent on our ability to successfully develop, obtain regulatory approval for, and then successfully commercialize our product candidates, and we may fail to do so for many reasons, including the following:

Reworded

We may not be successful in our efforts to further develop our product candidates. We are not permitted to market or promote any of our product candidates before we receive regulatory approval from FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, and we may never receive such regulatory approval for any of our product candidates. SavaDx is in the early stages of development. Simufilam, our lead product candidate, will require successful completion of a Phase 3 program, management of preclinical, clinical, and manufacturing activities, regulatory approval, adequate manufacturing supply, a commercial organization, and significant marketing efforts before we generate any revenue from product sales, if at all.

Reworded

Results of any of our preclinical studies or Phase 1 or Phase 2 clinical trials with simufilam are not predictive of the future results of any other trial, including any later-stage Phase 3 clinical trials. Notwithstanding promising results in earlier stage trials, our firsttwo Phase 3 trialtrials in Alzheimer’s disease did not meet each of the pre-specified co-primary, secondary and exploratory biomarker endpoints. Simufilam may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy in additional Phase 3 clinical trials despite having progressed successfully through preclinical studies and initial clinical trials in the applicable indication. Many biopharmaceutical companies have suffered significant setbacks in Phase 3 clinical trials due to lack of efficacy or adverse safety profiles, notwithstanding promising results in earlier trials. We cannot be certain that our product candidates under development will not continue to face similar setbacks.

Reworded

In addition, preliminary conclusions based on data from analyses of Phase 1 and Phase 2 clinical studies and open-label results may not be reproduced when implemented in large, well-controlled, randomized clinical trials. Particular caution should be exercised when interpreting preliminary data, data relating to a small number of patients and data from open-label uncontrolled studies, which are generally not capable of providing interpretable evidence of efficacy. Phase 1 studies are designed to assess the initial safety characteristics of simufilamsimufilam. and suchSuch studies are not designed to, and do not, evaluate safety, tolerability and efficacy of simufilam in patients. Similarly, Phase 2 clinical studies with simufilam that we conduct are designed to assess the safety characteristics of simufilam in patients. Such Phase 2 programs are not designed to, and do not, evaluate large-scale or long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of simufilam in patients. There can be no assurance that future large, well-controlled, multi-dose studies will demonstrate the safety, tolerability or efficacy of simufilam to treat patients with any indication, including Alzheimer’s disease or TSC-related epilepsy.

Reworded

Results observed in preclinical studies and early-stageearly stage clinical trials for simufilam are not regulatorysufficient evidence of drug safety or efficacy.efficacy for purposes of regulatory approval.

Reworded

Data results from any preclinical and non-Phaseearly 3stage studies that we conduct do not constitute, and should not be interpreted as, regulatorysufficient evidence of safety or efficacy for simufilam to obtain regulatory approval in the applicable indication, including Alzheimer’s disease or TSC-related epilepsy. Rigorous evidence for drug safety and efficacy is derived only from one or more large, randomized, placebo-controlled studies. The size and open-label design of portions of our non-Phaseearly 3stage studies may introduce clinical or statistical bias or may generate results that may not fully distinguish between drug effects and random variation. Different methods of statistical analysis on clinical data from the same study may lead to objectively different numerical results. These and other statistical and clinical features of our non-Phaseearly 3stage studies add complexity or limitations to the scope of data interpretation.

Reworded

Clinical testing is expensive, time consuming, and subject to uncertainty. We cannot guarantee that any clinical studies will be conducted as planned, enroll patients as planned or be completed on schedule, if at all. As demonstrated by the clinical hold issued by FDA for our planned proof of concept trial in TSC-related epilepsy, regulatory action can delay a clinical study’s initiation and/or completion. Moreover, even after our studies begin, safety or other issues may arise that could suspend or terminate such clinical studies. A failure of one or more clinical studies can occur at any stage of testing, and our ongoing or future clinical studies may not be successful. Events that may prevent successful or timely initiation or completion of clinical studies include:

Added

Governmental actions with respect to U.S. drug prices could negatively impact our business.

Added

U.S. federal and state governments have proposed and implemented, and may continue to propose or implement, measures intended to reduce prescription drug prices or control healthcare costs. Such actions could result in pricing or reimbursement pressures, increased compliance obligations, or changes in market access for our future products, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Removed

The FDA may not accept data from Phase 3 clinical trials conducted in foreign locations.

Removed

We have conducted and may in the future conduct portions of our Phase 3 clinical trials outside the United States. For example, the clinical trial must be conducted and performed by qualified investigators in accordance with ethical principles. The trial population must also adequately represent the U.S. population, and the data must be applicable to the U.S. population and U.S. medical practice in ways that the FDA deems clinically meaningful. In general, the patient population for any clinical trials we conduct outside the United States must be representative of the population for which we intend to label the product in the United States. In addition, while Phase 3 clinical trials conducted outside the United States are subject to the applicable local laws, FDA acceptance of the data will be dependent upon its determination that the trials also complied with all applicable U.S. laws and regulations. We cannot assure you that the FDA will accept data from portions of our Phase 3 trials conducted outside the United States. If the FDA does not accept such data from such clinical trials, we would likely need to conduct additional trials, which would be costly and time-consuming and delay or permanently halt our development of simufilam, our lead investigational product.

Removed

The FDA or other regulatory agencies may put a clinical hold on our clinical studies, which would cause our business to suffer.

Removed

A clinical hold is an order issued by FDA or another regulatory agency to suspend an ongoing clinical trial, typically due to newly identified deficiencies with, or the need for additional information regarding, the subject study or drug candidate. The grounds for imposition of a clinical hold are complex, variable and fact specific. If FDA imposes a clinical hold on any of our future clinical studies, no new patients may be enrolled in the subject study and study patients already in such study may be taken off our drug candidate unless treatment is specifically permitted by FDA in the interest of patient safety. If we are issued a clinical hold, FDA would expect us to address the cited deficiencies or provide the requested additional information, in each case, through the submission of a detailed, written response. A clinical hold would require us to spend significant resources, potentially over an extended period of time, to address the root causes of FDA’s concerns, even if we disagreed with the FDA’s assessment of asserted deficiencies. If we were unable to find and successfully address such root causes or if our response were deemed inadequate to lift the clinical hold, this could adversely affect our business. If we were subjected to a clinical hold that remained in effect for one year or longer, the FDA may consider the IND for the affected product candidate to fall into Inactive Status, which may result in termination of the corresponding clinical program. To the extent we are not successful in lifting any clinical hold that the FDA might impose, our results of operations and business will be materially adversely affected.

Reworded

All of theOur product candidates in our pipeline are still in development. Such product candidates will take several years to develop and must undergo extensive clinical and scientific validations. Even if we are successful in developing any of our product candidates through clinical and scientific validation, we may not be able to develop a drug or a diagnostic that:

Reworded

We currently do not have nothe in-house capabilities to manufacture or commercialize our product candidates, and we rely on a third-party commercial drug manufacturersmanufacturing organization for supplies of simufilam. If we are unable to develop our own manufacturing, sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, or if we are not successful in contracting with third parties for these services on favorable terms, or at all, our product revenues could be adversely impacted.

Reworded

We currently do not have nothe sales, marketing or distribution capabilities.capabilities necessary to support a commercial program. We have not established commercial strategies regarding any of our product candidates. In order to commercialize our products, if any are approved by FDA, we will either have to develop such capabilities internally or collaborate with third parties who can perform these services for us.

Reworded

We substantially rely and expect to continue to rely on third parties, such as contract research organizations (CROs),CROs, clinical data management organizations, medical institutions, and clinical investigators, to conduct some aspects of our research and preclinical testing and our clinical studies. For example, Pentara Corporation, an independent consulting firm that specializes in complex statistical analysis of clinical trials, has conducted statistical analysis relating to cognition endpoints in our clinical studies. Any of these third parties may terminate their engagements with us or be unable to fulfill their contractual obligations. If we need to enter into alternative arrangements, it will delay our product development activities.

Reworded

If our third-party vendors do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, meet expected deadlines, or conduct studies in accordance with regulatory requirements or our stated protocols, we will not be able to obtain, or may be delayed in obtaining, marketing approvals for any product candidates we may develop and will not be able to, or may be delayed in our efforts to, successfully commercialize our product candidates. For example, one of our vendors in the past failed to fully comply with certain Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) norms in its research facility, which required us to repeat a lab study at a different research site.

Reworded

OurUntil 2025, our drug development strategy has been focused on clinically testing our product candidates in Alzheimer’s disease, our primary indication.disease. We mayare expandnow expanding our research efforts outside of this primary indication and into other areas of clinical medicine based on a variety of factors.factors, Forwith example,an initial focus on TSC-related epilepsy. We are currently subject to a full clinical hold. If we planare successful in our efforts to have the clinical hold lifted, we intend to conduct exploratorya preclinicalproof-of-concept studiesclinical in collaboration with the TSCAstudy to better understand simufilam’s potential as a treatment for seizuresTSC-related in TSC.epilepsy. Conducting clinical studies for additional indications for our product candidates will require substantial technical, financial and human resources and is prone to the inherent risks of failure in drug development. We cannot provide any assurance that we will be successful in our effort to expand our technology or our product candidates in additional indications.

Removed

We have never obtained FDA approval for a diagnostic test and we may not be able to secure such approval in a timely manner or at all.

Removed

We are developing an investigational blood-based diagnostic test for Alzheimer’s disease, called SavaDx, which will require FDA approval prior to commercialization. Our diagnostic product candidate, marketing, sales and development activities and manufacturing processes are subject to extensive and rigorous regulation by FDA pursuant to the FDCA, by comparable agencies in foreign countries, and by other regulatory agencies and governing bodies. Under the FDCA, a diagnostic must receive FDA clearance or approval before it can be commercially marketed in the United States. The process of obtaining marketing approval or clearance from FDA or by comparable agencies in foreign countries for new products could:

Removed

If we do not compete effectively with scientific and commercial competitors, we may not be able to successfully develop our diagnostic test for Alzheimer’s disease.

Removed

The field of clinical laboratory testing is highly competitive. Diagnostic tests are characterized by rapid technological change. Our competitors in the United States and abroad are numerous and include, among others, major diagnostic companies, reference laboratories, molecular diagnostic firms, universities and other research institutions. Most of our potential competitors have considerably greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we do, which may allow these competitors to discover important biological markers and determine their function before we do. We could be adversely affected if we do not discover proteins or biomarkers and characterize their function, develop diagnostic and pharmaceutical and clinical services based on these discoveries, obtain required regulatory and other approvals and launch these tests and their related services before our competitors. We also expect to encounter significant competition with respect to any diagnostic tests that we may develop or commercialize. Those companies that bring to market new diagnostic tests before we do may achieve a significant competitive advantage in marketing and commercializing their tests. We may not be able to develop additional diagnostic tests successfully and we may not obtain or enforce patents, if any, covering these tests that provide protection against our competitors. Moreover, our competitors may succeed in developing diagnostic tests that circumvent our technologies or tests. Furthermore, our competitors may succeed in developing technologies or tests that are more effective or less costly than those developed by us or that would render our technologies or tests less competitive or obsolete. We expect competition to intensify in the fields in which we are involved as technical advances in these fields occur and become more widely known and changes in intellectual property laws generate challenges to our intellectual property position.

Removed

We will need to find alternative approaches that do not involve antibodies to advance our SavaDx and our diagnostic program.

Removed

To date, most of our tests with SavaDx have relied on the use of commercially available antibodies, which are complex molecules that can recognize and bind to an intended protein. Commercially available antibodies can present technical challenges, such as improper validation, significant batch-to-batch variations or inconsistent storage, any of which can jeopardize our studies and experiments. Hence, we are evaluating an alternative approach to detect Alzheimer’s disease using mass spectrometry to detect FLNA, i.e., without the use of antibodies. The complexity of such an alternative approach also gives rise to many technical issues that are challenging to solve. We cannot be certain that we will be able to successfully complete the development of a detection system for Alzheimer’s disease that does or does not involve antibodies.

Removed

Our Phase 2 clinical studies with simufilam are generally not designed to show a statistically meaningful difference in cognition or other health functions between those patients who receive placebo and those who receive drug.

Removed

Clinical research data is often analyzed with statistical probability (p-value) to address the question of whether a clinical observation is related to a treatment effect, a random effect or something else. This, in turn, requires a clinical study to incorporate a sufficiently large sample patient population to infer the appropriate statistical analysis. By design, our Phase 2 clinical studies with simufilam generally do not include a sufficiently large patient population to generate statistical probability on measures of cognition or other health functions. This feature may make it difficult for investors to properly interpret whether clinical observations in those Phase 2 studies with simufilam are important or meaningful. Conversely, our clinical studies may generate statistically significant data (i.e., p<0.05) on exploratory biomarkers, or other endpoints, that have unknown or no clinical importance. In general, the distinction between statistically significant data and clinically meaningful data is a complex area of research that continues to evolve and may be subject to differences of opinion among scientists, clinicians, biostatisticians and other professionals, as well as among government regulators.

Removed

To the extent that our open-label study suggested differences in treatment effects by stage of disease, such observations may or may not replicate in any of our subsequent clinical studies.

Removed

Alzheimer’s dementia is a progressive, degenerate disease. Severity of disease is typically assessed by stage of disease progression, a continuum that ranges from, approximately, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), to early stage, to mild, to moderate and finally to severe disease. Over time, cognition progressively worsens in the mild-to-moderate stages of Alzheimer’s as the disease takes its toll. However, we do not have a clear understanding of how our drug candidate simufilam may impact patients by stage of disease, if at all. For example, to the extent that our open-label and small placebo-controlled studies suggested apparent differences in treatment effects by stage of disease, such observations may not replicate in any of our subsequent clinical studies.

Reworded

The results of our preclinical studies with our product candidates may not be predictive of the results of early-stage or later-stage clinical studies, and results of early clinical studies of our product candidates may not be predictive of the results of later-stage clinical studies. The results of clinical studies in one set of patients or disease indications may not be predictive of those obtained in another. In some instances, there can be significant variability in safety or efficacy results between different clinical studies of the same product candidate due to numerous factors, including changes in study procedures set forth in protocols, differences in the size and type of the patient populations, changes in and adherence to the dosing regimen, and other clinical study protocols and the rate of dropout among clinical study participants. Product candidates in later stages of clinical studies may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy profile despite having progressed through preclinical studies and initial clinical studies. Most new product candidates for central nervous system disorders that begin clinical studies are never approved by regulatory authorities for commercialization.

Removed

We may suffer significant setbacks in Phase 3 clinical studies due to lack of efficacy or unacceptable safety issues, notwithstanding promising results in earlier studies. For example, our first Phase 3 trial in Alzheimer's disease did not meet each of the pre-specified co-primary, secondary and exploratory biomarker endpoints. Clinical trials in central nervous system disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease, have much higher historically failure rates than in many other disease areas. Most new product candidates for central nervous system disorders that begin clinical studies are never approved by regulatory authorities for commercialization.

Reworded

Several pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies are currently pursuing the development of products for the treatment of central nervous system disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease and TSC-related epilepsy. Many of these current or potential competitors, either alone or with their strategic partners, have significantly greater financial resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, preclinical testing, conducting clinical studies, obtaining regulatory approvals, and marketing approved products than we do.

Reworded

We are currently managing inquiries from U.S. government agencies, as well as civil claims under federal and state laws, relating to and/or arising out of research and development of our product candidates, including grant applications, securities disclosures and other aspects of our business. For additional information regarding legal proceedings, see "“Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Contingencies"”. New claims or inquiries may arise in the future.

Reworded

In response to governmentsuch documentlegal requests and other claims asserted against us,proceedings, we have established a comprehensive document retention policy that strictly governs how we handle, store and protect our documents and data. Failure to comply with our document retention policy would expose us to risk of enforcement actions and penalties under applicable laws.

Reworded

Legal proceedings are inherently unpredictable, and large judgments or penalties sometimes occur. As a consequence, we may in the future incur judgments or penalties that could involve large cash payments, including the potential repayment of amounts allegedly obtained improperly and other penalties, including enhanced damages. For example, the Company paid a civil monetary penalty of $40 million in November 2024 as part of a settlement with the SEC resolving the SEC investigation of the Company’s disclosures regarding its Phase 2b Study and related matters. In addition, the Company has recently agreed to pay $31.25 million to settle certain securities litigation. While we maintain insurance coverage for certain types of claims, such insurance coverage may be insufficient to cover all losses or all types of claims that may arise.

Added

Our application to register our new corporate name as a trademark may be denied, which could adversely affect our business.

Added

We have applied to register our new corporate name, Filana Therapeutics, as a trademark, but there can be no assurance that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) will approve the application. If registration is denied, we may be unable to obtain the scope of trademark protection we desire for our corporate name, which could limit our ability to prevent third parties from using confusingly similar names or marks. A denial could also require us to incur additional costs to pursue alternative branding strategies, enforce unregistered rights, or consider further changes to our corporate name or branding, any of which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, or reputation.

Removed

For example, on June 28, 2024, the DOJ announced that a federal grand jury in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland returned an indictment of Dr. Hoau-Yan Wang, a former scientific collaborator and advisor to Cassava. The indictment alleges that Dr. Wang caused Cassava to submit grant applications to NIH that contained false and fraudulent representations about his research. See “—2024 Non-Product Development Business Developments—Indictment of Hoau-Yan Wang.”

Reworded

Activities subject to laws also involve the improper use of information obtained in the course of patient recruitment for clinical studies, which could result in regulatory sanctions and cause serious harm to our reputation. Further, itIt is not always possible to identify and deter misconduct by employees and third parties, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to comply with such laws. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a significant impact on our business, including reputational damage and the imposition of significant fines or other sanctions.

Reworded

In the U.S., the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “Medicare Modernization Act”) established the Medicare Part D program and provided authority for limiting the number of drugs that will be covered in any therapeutic class thereunder. The Medicare Modernization Act, including its cost reduction initiatives, could limit the coverage and reimbursement rate that we receive for any of our approved products. Private payors may follow Medicare coverage policies and payment limitations in setting their own reimbursement rates resulting in similar limits in payments from private payors.

Removed

U.S. intellectual property rights around diagnostic methods is a complex, evolving area of law and effective patent claims may not be available to us for our investigational diagnostic product candidate, SavaDx, in the United States.

Showing the first 60 of 91 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

25new paragraphs
31removed paragraphs
18reworded paragraphs
5,429 → 5,127words in section

New heading “We Own or Control Worldwide Rights to Our Drug Development Program”

New heading “Preclinical Studies with Simufilam in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex”

New heading “Change in fair value of warrants”

Removed heading “Clinical Trials in Alzheimer’s Disease (Discontinued)”

Removed heading “2022 Registered Direct Offering”

Removed heading “2020 Cash Incentive Bonus Plan Obligations”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Reworded topics: securities and exchange commission, fine

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

On MayNovember 1,12, 2023,2025, we entered into an at-the-market offering program (ATM) to sell, from time to time, shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $200$50 million in common stock in transactions pursuant to a shelf registration statement that was fileddeclared witheffective by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on MayDecember 1,5, 2023 and became effective immediately upon filing.2025. We are obligated to pay a commission of up to 3%3.0% of the gross proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock underin the ATM.offering. We are not obligated to sell any shares in the offering. As of the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company is no longer a Well-Known Seasoned Issuer, as defined by the SEC. Thus, the Company is not eligible to sell securities under the ATM under its existing “automatic” shelf registration statement on Form S-3 unless and until it files a new Form S-3 that is declared effective by the SEC.
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: investigation, labor
“We intend to conduct exploratory preclinical studies in collaboration with the TSCA to better understand simufilam’s potential as a treatment for TSC-related seizures. Based on the results of these studies, considered together with Dr. Bordey’s work, the Company will assess whether sufficient support exists for an Investigational New Drug (IND) application in respect of a proof-of-concept open-label clinical trial for simufilam in TSC-related epilepsy.”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: china, israel

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

We solelyown ownor exclusively control a portfolio of issued patents and pending patent applications directed to simufilam and related diagnostic assets. These intellectual property rights include patents covering the composition of matter of our drugfor simufilam in the United States, Europe, Australia, IsraelIsrael, and Canada.Canada, Weas solelywell ownas patents covering certain methods of use of our drug simufilam in the United States, EuropeEurope, and Japan. We solelyalso own pending patent applications that covercovering diagnostic assets forrelated to simufilam in the United States, Europe, Japan, China, Canada, and Australia.Australia, Weas solelywell ownas additional pending patent applications that covercovering other diagnostic assets in the United States, Europe, Japan, ChinaChina, and Canada. We have no obligation to pay any royalty to any third party in connection with any of the foregoing described patents and patent applications. In the United States, our patent protection with respect to simufilam, its solid forms, and uses of simufilam for Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative diseases includes nine issued United States patents, with terms expiring on dates ranging from 2029 to 2040, subject to any patent extensions that may be available for such patents. Corresponding foreign filings have been made for each of the Unites States filings.
see in full comparison
New text
“We Own or Control Worldwide Rights to Our Drug Development Program”
see in full comparison
New text
“Preclinical Studies with Simufilam in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“Clinical Trials in Alzheimer’s Disease (Discontinued)”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (74)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 9 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Added

Filana Therapeutics, Inc. (formerly Cassava Sciences, Inc.) is a clinical-stage biotechnology company based in Austin, Texas. Our mission is to develop transformative medicines to improve the lives of patients with CNS disorders, such as Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC)-related epilepsy and other diseases associated with dysregulation or overexpression of filamin A. Our science is based on modulating the activity of a critical protein in the brain for patients with certain CNS disorders, such as TSC. Our lead therapeutic drug candidate, simufilam, was under clinical evaluation for the proposed treatment of Alzheimer’s disease in two Phase 3 clinical studies through 2024, when all ongoing clinical trials for simufilam in Alzheimer’s disease were discontinued. The phase out of the Company’s Alzheimer's disease development program was completed in the second quarter of 2025.

Added

Our lead therapeutic product candidate, simufilam, is a proprietary small molecule oral treatment drug being studied for the treatment of TSC-related epilepsy. Simufilam was discovered and designed in-house and was characterized by our academic collaborators during research activities that were conducted from approximately 2008 to date.

Added

Simufilam is intended to modulate the activity of a protein called filamin A, which regulates diverse aspects of neuronal cell development. Our and our collaborators’ published studies have demonstrated that the combination of mTOR activation and filamin A overexpression causes cell overgrowth, abnormal connectivity, and brain malformations, leading to seizures in patients with TSC. While such seizures have historically been treated with mTOR inhibitors and other drugs, filamin A represents a novel target for the potential treatment of TSC-related epilepsy, independent of mTOR. Simufilam is a potential first-in-class filamin A-modulating agent with the potential to treat TSC-related epilepsy. We continue to explore other potential indications for simufilam, both CNS related and otherwise, where our pre-clinical experiments suggest that simufilam may provide a benefit.

Added

We Own or Control Worldwide Rights to Our Drug Development Program

Added

Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain, maintain, and enforce intellectual property protection for our product candidates, including simufilam, and related technologies. We seek to protect our proprietary position through a combination of patents, patent applications, trade secrets, know‑how, and other intellectual property rights.

Removed

Cassava Sciences, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company based in Austin, Texas. Our mission is to detect and treat central nervous system disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease and TSC-related epilepsy. Our novel science is based on stabilizing – but not removing – a critical protein in the brain for patients with certain central nervous system disorders, such as Alzheimer’s or TSC.

Removed

Our lead therapeutic drug candidate, simufilam, was under clinical evaluation for the proposed treatment of Alzheimer’s disease in Phase 3 clinical studies through 2024, when all ongoing clinical trials for simufilam in Alzheimer’s disease were discontinued.

Removed

We combine innovative technology with new insights in neurobiology to develop novel solutions targeting Alzheimer’s disease, TSC-related epilepsy, and other central nervous system disorders. Our strategy is to leverage our unique scientific/clinical platform to develop first-in-class programs for treating central nervous system disorders. In addition, we are in the early stages of exploring potential artificial intelligence (“AI”) capabilities and related data analytics to target improvements in productivity and efficiency in our business, enhancements to research and development activities, and advancements in statistical analysis capabilities.

Removed

We currently have two biopharmaceutical assets under development:

Removed

Simufilam targets a protein called filamin A (FLNA) in the brain of patients with central nervous system disorders, such as Alzheimer’s or TSC. Our and our collaborators' published studies have demonstrated that the altered form of FLNA is linked to neuronal dysfunction, neuronal degeneration and neuroinflammation. In Alzheimer’s disease, we believe simufilam disrupts amyloid binding to the α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7nAChR), which underlies our drug’s primary mechanism of action in Alzheimer’s disease. Published pre-clinical studies further show that overexpression of FLNA in patients with TSC may be associated with epileptic seizure activity. On February 26, 2025, we entered into a License Agreement with Yale to support our development and commercialization efforts for simufilam for the treatment of TSC-related epilepsy.

Reworded

We solelyown ownor exclusively control a portfolio of issued patents and pending patent applications directed to simufilam and related diagnostic assets. These intellectual property rights include patents covering the composition of matter of our drugfor simufilam in the United States, Europe, Australia, IsraelIsrael, and Canada.Canada, Weas solelywell ownas patents covering certain methods of use of our drug simufilam in the United States, EuropeEurope, and Japan. We solelyalso own pending patent applications that covercovering diagnostic assets forrelated to simufilam in the United States, Europe, Japan, China, Canada, and Australia.Australia, Weas solelywell ownas additional pending patent applications that covercovering other diagnostic assets in the United States, Europe, Japan, ChinaChina, and Canada. We have no obligation to pay any royalty to any third party in connection with any of the foregoing described patents and patent applications. In the United States, our patent protection with respect to simufilam, its solid forms, and uses of simufilam for Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative diseases includes nine issued United States patents, with terms expiring on dates ranging from 2029 to 2040, subject to any patent extensions that may be available for such patents. Corresponding foreign filings have been made for each of the Unites States filings.

Added

In the United States, our patent protection relating to simufilam, including its solid forms and methods of use for Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative diseases, consists of nine issued U.S. patents, with expiration dates ranging from 2029 to 2040, subject to potential patent term extensions and adjustments. We have filed corresponding foreign patent applications for each of these U.S. patent families where we believe such protection is commercially appropriate.

Added

In addition to our owned intellectual property, on February 26, 2025, we entered into the License Agreement with Yale pursuant to which we were granted exclusive worldwide rights, with rights to sublicense, to Yale’s interest in certain patent and other intellectual property rights that could be useful or necessary to the development and commercialization of simufilam for the treatment of TSC‑related epilepsy and other potential indications. Under this exclusive, worldwide license, we have the right to sublicense the licensed intellectual property. The license is subject to customary diligence obligations and includes milestone payments, royalties on net sales of licensed products, and other contingent payments, including payments tied to the transfer of any regulatory priority review voucher, if issued. As a result, commercial sales of simufilam or related products, if any, may be subject to royalty obligations to Yale.

Added

Except for intellectual property licensed from third parties, including pursuant to the License Agreement with Yale, we do not owe royalties or other payments to third parties with respect to our owned patents and patent applications covering simufilam.

Removed

Clinical Trials in Alzheimer’s Disease (Discontinued)

Removed

We have conducted two randomized placebo-controlled Phase 3 clinical trials of oral simufilam in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Our first Phase 3 study, called RETHINK-ALZ, was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of simufilam 100 mg tablets versus placebo over 52 weeks (NCT04994483). Our second Phase 3 study, called REFOCUS-ALZ, was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral simufilam 100 mg and 50 mg tablets versus placebo over 76 weeks (NCT05026177).

Removed

On November 25, 2024, we announced that the top-line results from the Phase 3 RETHINK-ALZ study of simufilam in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease did not meet each of the pre-specified co-primary, secondary and exploratory biomarker endpoints. The co-primary endpoints were the change in cognition and function from baseline to the end of the double-blind treatment period at week 52, assessed by the ADAS-COG12 and ADCS-ADL scales, comparing simufilam to placebo. Simufilam continued to demonstrate an overall favorable safety profile.

Removed

In light of the top-line results from the Phase 3 RETHINK-ALZ study, the Company also outlined its plan to discontinue the Phase 3 REFOCUS-ALZ study and Open Label Extension study and to analyze the complete 52-week dataset from the REFOCUS-ALZ study, along with a large portion of 76-week data. The Company expects to release top-line REFOCUS-ALZ results late first-quarter/early second-quarter 2025.

Removed

Following the release of the topline REFOCUS-ALZ results, the Company intends to evaluate the results and determine the next steps for the future advancement, if any, of its Alzheimer’s program.

Reworded

Exploratory Preclinical Studies with Simufilam inAbout Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC)

Added

TSC is a genetic disorder that results from a mutation in the TSC1 or TSC2 genes. According to the Tuberous Sclerosis Alliance (TSCA), TSC is estimated to affect around 1 in 6,000 live births with approximately 50,000 people affected in the United States and more than one million worldwide. Clinical symptoms of TSC are variable and can impact organ systems with non-malignant tumors developing in brain, eyes, heart, kidney, skin and lungs. Interrelated neuropsychiatric manifestations of TSC such as intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, anxiety, aggression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and sleep disturbance can significantly impact quality of life. Epilepsy is common in TSC, occurring in 84% of patients registered in the TSC Alliance Natural History Database with onset often occurring in their first year of life. Approximately 60 percent of TSC patients suffer from treatment-resistant seizures despite use of multiple anti-seizure medications. TSC-related epilepsy is associated with poor outcomes and increases the risk of cognitive deficits.

Added

Preclinical Studies with Simufilam in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex

Reworded

Preclinical research conducted at Yale indicateindicates that simufilam (then PTI-125) may be effective in reducing TSC-related seizure activity. A study conducted by Angelique Bordey, PhD, at Yale and published in the peer-reviewed journal Neuron in 2014 found overexpression of FLNAfilamin A and neuronal abnormalities in brain tissue from TSC patients.patients, as well as in brain tissue from mice that had been genetically altered to model TSC. The study further found that genetically normalizing filamin A expression in the mice prevented neuronal abnormalities. The paper, MEK-ERK1/2-Dependent FLNA Overexpression Promotes Abnormal Dendritic Patterning in Tuberous Sclerosis Independent of mTOR (Neuron. 2014 Oct 1. PMID: 25277454), was co-authored by Zhang L, Bartley CM, Gong X, Hsieh LS, Lin TV and Feliciano DM. A later study conducted by Dr. Bordey and published in the peer-reviewed journal Science Translational Medicine in 2020 likewise found elevated FLNA in brains of a related mouse model. That study further demonstrated that simufilam treatment in the mouse model reduced the number of seizing mice and reduced seizure frequency. This 2020 paper, Filamin A Inhibition Reduces Seizure Activity in a Mouse Model of Focal Cortical Malformations (Sci Transl Med. 2020 Feb 19. PMID: 32076941), was co-authored by Zhang L, Huang T, Teaw S, Nguyen LH, Hsieh LS, Gong X, and Lindsay Burns, a former employee of the Company. While these data are promising, understanding their true significance requires additional exploration.

Added

A later study conducted by Dr. Bordey and published in the peer-reviewed journal Science Translational Medicine in 2020 likewise found elevated filamin A and neuronal abnormalities in brain tissue from patients with focal cortical dysplasia type II (FCDII), a genetic disorder with similar characteristics to TSC, as well as in the brains of mice that had been genetically altered to model TSC and FCDII. That study showed that normalizing filamin A expression in the mice through genetic knockdown both limited the neuronal abnormalities and reduced the frequency of epileptic seizures in the mice. This 2020 paper, Filamin A Inhibition Reduces Seizure Activity in a Mouse Model of Focal Cortical Malformations (Sci Transl Med. 2020 Feb 19. PMID: 32076941), was co-authored by Zhang L, Huang T, Teaw S, Nguyen LH, Hsieh LS, Gong X, and Lindsay Burns, a former employee of the Company.

Added

In this 2020 study, Dr. Bordey and her colleagues also studied the effect of treatment with simufilam in the mice that had been altered to model TSC and FCDII. The research showed that treatment with simufilam limited neuronal abnormalities and reduced seizure activity in the mouse model at a level similar to genetic knockdown of filamin A expression. Treatment with simufilam did not, however, affect the level of filamin A in the brains of the mice.

Added

Dr. Bordey joined the Company as Senior Vice President, Neuroscience, on May 1, 2025, while continuing her tenured academic position at Yale School of Medicine on a part time basis. In connection with plans to initiate a clinical program in TSC-related epilepsy, the Company appointed Dr. Joseph Hulihan as Chief Medical Officer in August 2025. Dr. Hulihan, who brings over 25 years of industry experience, devotes approximately half of his professional time to the Company and will advise on the clinical development of simufilam.

Added

In August 2025, the Company announced positive preclinical results of a study evaluating simufilam in a well-accepted mouse model of TSC-related epilepsy. The study was conducted in collaboration with the TSCA and the TSC Preclinical Consortium using an animal model of TSC-related epilepsy, the Tsc1 conditional knockout (CKO) mouse line (Tsc1-CKO). These mice develop spontaneous seizures and are used by the TSC Alliance to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of novel and repurposed therapeutics in the potential treatment of TSC-related epilepsy. The study was conducted by PsychoGenics, Inc., the TSC Preclinical Consortium’s research partner.

Added

The Tsc1-CKO mice were treated with several doses of simufilam. Seizure activity was monitored for approximately three weeks after onset, and simufilam was evaluated against treatment with vehicle alone. The data showed that simufilam attenuated the progression of seizure activity, with a statistically significant correlation between simufilam dose and the number of seizures by the end of the study. Not all parameters measured reached statistical significance. The Company intends to present data and analyses in an upcoming scientific conference and publication.

Added

Based on the results of these studies, the Company filed an Investigational New Drug (IND) application with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in order to initiate a proof-of-concept clinical trial for simufilam in TSC-related epilepsy. On December 15, 2025, the Company received a formal letter from FDA confirming that the proposed clinical trial is on full clinical hold subject to the Company providing FDA with additional information, including additional pre-clinical data, and modifying the protocol design.

Added

The Company is working expeditiously to address the items identified in the letter. However, as announced on December 18, 2025, the Company no longer expects to initiate a proof-of-concept clinical trial for simufilam in TSC-related epilepsy in the first half of 2026. The updated timing for initiation of a clinical trial will depend on the Company’s ability to provide the requested information and on satisfactory completion of FDA’s review.

Removed

We intend to conduct exploratory preclinical studies in collaboration with the TSCA to better understand simufilam’s potential as a treatment for TSC-related seizures. Based on the results of these studies, considered together with Dr. Bordey’s work, the Company will assess whether sufficient support exists for an Investigational New Drug (IND) application in respect of a proof-of-concept open-label clinical trial for simufilam in TSC-related epilepsy.

Reworded

On February 26, 2025, we entered into the License Agreement with Yale pursuant to which we were granted exclusive worldwide rights, with rights to sublicense, to Yale’s interest in certain patent and other intellectual property rights that could be useful or necessary to the development and commercialization of simufilam for the treatment of TSC-related epilepsy and other potential indications. Pursuant to the License Agreement, we have agreed to use reasonable commercial efforts to implement a plan that it has designed for such development and commercialization.

Reworded

In exchange for the rights acquired pursuant to the License Agreement, we agreed to paypaid Yale (i) a nominal upfront license fee, and agreed to pay (ii) payments upon the achievement of specified clinical, regulatory and commercial milestones, totaling up to $4.5 million and (iii) upon transfer to a third party of a regulatory priority review voucher, if issued, a low-to-mid double digit percentage of any consideration received for such transfer. We also agreed to pay Yale tiered royalties, ranging from a low- to mid- single digit percentage, on aggregate net sales of licensed products, subject to tiered minimum annual royalty payments ranging from the low- to mid- hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Reworded

We focus substantially all of our research and development efforts in the development of simufilam. Research and development expenses for our investigational diagnostic product candidate, SavaDx, represented less than 1% of total research and development expenses for the periods presented. The SavaDx program was discontinued in mid-2025. The following table summarizes expenses by category for research and development efforts (in thousands):

Removed

During the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we did not receive reimbursement from NIH research grants. During the year ended December 31, 2022, we received $0.9 million in research grants from the NIH. When applicable, the proceeds from grants are recorded as reductions to our research and development expenses.

Reworded

Estimating the dates of completion of clinical development, and the costs to complete development, of our product candidates would be highly speculative and subjective. Pharmaceutical products take a significant amount of time to research, develop and commercialize. The clinical study portion of the development of a new drug alone usually spans several years. We expect our research and development expensesexpense to decrease significantly in 2025future periods as athe resultphase out of decreased spending for our Phase 3 program in Alzheimer's disease, as both Phase 3 studies have either been completed or discontinued. Our open label studies inthe Alzheimer's disease havedevelopment alsoprogram beenwas discontinued. The decreasecompleted in clinicalQ2 2025, and expenses for the TSC-related epilepsy program costs isare expected to be partiallysignificantly offsetlower by higher stock-based compensation expense. We expectcompared to reassess our future research and development plans based on our review of data we receive from our current research and development activities. In particular, following our release of the topline REFOCUS-ALZ results, we intend to evaluate the results and determine the next stepsthose for the futureAlzheimer's advancement, if any, of our Alzheimer’sdisease program. The cost and pace of our future research and development activities are linked and subject to change.

Added

Research and development expenses decreased to $26.6 million in 2025 from $69.6 million in 2024, representing a 62% decrease. This decrease was due primarily to the phase out of the Alzheimer's disease development program beginning the fourth quarter of 2024 and completed in the second quarter of 2025.

Added

We expect research and development expense to decrease in future periods as the phase out of the Alzheimer's disease development program was completed in Q2 2025, and expenses for the TSC-related epilepsy program are expected to be significantly lower compared to those for the Alzheimer's disease program.

Removed

Research and development expenses decreased to $69.6 million in 2024 from $89.4 million in 2023, representing a 22% decrease. This decrease was due primarily to the completion of enrollment for our Phase 3 clinical program in the fall of 2023. Patients continually completed the Phase 3 program in 2024 and all clinical studies were in the process of being discontinued at year-end 2024. These decreases were partially offset by a $4.4 million increase in stock-based compensation expense due to new grant awards in 2024.

Removed

We expect significant costs to continue in the first quarter of 2025 as we wind down our existing clinical studies. Subsequently, we expect research and development expense to decrease significantly in future periods. The decrease in clinical program costs is expected to be partially offset by higher stock-based compensation expense due to new grant awards in 2024.

Reworded

General and administrative expenses consist of personnel costs, allocated expenses and other expenses for outside professional services, including legal, human resources, audit and accounting services. Personnel costs consist of salaries, bonus, benefits and stock-based compensation. Allocated expenses consist primarily of existing facility costs. We incur insurance, audit, investor relations, SOX compliancerelations and other administrative and professional services expenses associated with operating as a public company, including expenses related to compliance with the rules and regulations of the SEC and Nasdaq. General and administrative expense increaseddecreased to $68.8 million in 2025 from $71.8 million in 2024 from $16.5 million in 2023.2024. The 334%4% increasedecrease was due primarily to completiona $40.0 million SEC-related loss contingency recorded in 2024 being partially offset by $9.9 million in insurance recoveries. This compared to a $31.3 million securities litigation loss contingency and $4 million of theother $40litigation millioncontingencies settlementrecorded within the2025, SECfor aswhich wellthere aswere no insurance recoveries. The change also included a $7.3$2.6 million increase in stock-based compensation expense due to new grantawards awardsgranted in late 20232024. andThese 2024,increases increasedwere compensationpartially offset by a decrease in severance costs andrecorded higherin legalthe relatedprior expenses.year period which were not repeated in 2025.

Added

We expect general and administrative expense will decrease significantly in future periods as we entered into a binding term sheet to resolve our most significant, legacy litigation in 2025. However, we expect general and administrative expense to remain high compared to historic levels due to ongoing professional fees and legal expense related to other ongoing litigation. In addition, stock-based compensation expense is expected to be higher than historic levels due to new awards granted in 2024 and 2025.

Reworded

Interest income was $4.6 million in 2025 compared to $8.5 million in 2024 compared to $7.8 million in 2023.2024. The increase46% in interest incomedecrease was due primarily to higher cash balances partially offset by lower interest rates and cash balances in 20242025 compared to the prior year.2024.

Reworded

We expect interest income to decrease significantly in 20252026 compared to 20242025 asdue weto uselower cash balances inand operations.interest rates.

Reworded

Other income,income (loss), net

Reworded

We record the activities related to leasing office space to third parties in buildings we own as other income,income (loss), net, as leasing is not core to the Company’s operations. Other income,income (loss), net, was $(0.2) million during 2025 compared to $0.4 million during 2024 compared to $0.9 million during 2023.2024. We expect to continue to record a modest net loss on leasing activities in 20252026 asdue to higher vacancy rates are expectedcompared to significantlyhistoric lower rental income.occupancy.

Added

Change in fair value of warrants

Added

There were no common stock warrants outstanding or change in fair value of warrants for the year ended December 31, 2025. The change in fair value of warrants was $108.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Added

The 2024 change was attributable to a gain on the change in fair value of our liability-classified warrants from distribution on January 3, 2024 to their redemption in May 2024. The change in fair value was primarily driven by a decrease in fair value at redemption as there was little or no market trading activity and the warrants were redeemed for a nominal payment of $0.001 per warrant.

Reworded

On April 15, 2024, the Company announced that all outstanding warrants were to be redeemed on May 7, 2024 (the “Redemption Date”). The redemption price was equal to 1/10 of $0.01 per warrant. The warrants were exercisable at any time starting on January 3, 2024 until the business day prior to the Redemption Date.

Removed

From January 3, 2024 to March 31, 2024, a total of approximately 674,000 warrants were exercised resulting in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $22.3 million. The Company issued approximately 1.0 million shares of common stock from the exercise of warrants through March 31, 2024.

Removed

Subsequent to March 31, 2024 and through the Redemption Date, a total of approximately 3.15 million warrants were exercised resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $104.0 million. The Company issued approximately 4.7 million shares of common stock from the exercise of warrants from March 31, 2024 through the Redemption Date.

Reworded

From January 3, 2024 through the Redemption Date, a total of approximately 3.8 million warrants were exercised. Gross proceeds infor 2024 from the warrant distribution totaled approximately $126.3 million from the issuance of approximately 5.7 million common shares at $22.00 per share. Total net proceeds of the warrant distribution were approximately $123.6 million after deducting exercise expenses and commissions.

Removed

2022 Registered Direct Offering

Removed

On November 22, 2022, we completed a common stock offering pursuant to which certain investors purchased 1,666,667 shares of common stock at a price of $30.00 per share. Net proceeds of the offering were approximately $47.3 million after deducting offering expenses.

Reworded

On MayNovember 1,12, 2023,2025, we entered into an at-the-market offering program (ATM) to sell, from time to time, shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $200$50 million in common stock in transactions pursuant to a shelf registration statement that was fileddeclared witheffective by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on MayDecember 1,5, 2023 and became effective immediately upon filing.2025. We are obligated to pay a commission of up to 3%3.0% of the gross proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock underin the ATM.offering. We are not obligated to sell any shares in the offering. As of the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company is no longer a Well-Known Seasoned Issuer, as defined by the SEC. Thus, the Company is not eligible to sell securities under the ATM under its existing “automatic” shelf registration statement on Form S-3 unless and until it files a new Form S-3 that is declared effective by the SEC.

Reworded

There were no common stock sales under the ATM during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.2025.

Removed

2020 Cash Incentive Bonus Plan Obligations

Removed

In August 2020, the Board approved the 2020 Cash Incentive Bonus Plan (the CIB Plan). The CIB Plan was established to promote the long-term success of the Company by creating an “at-risk” cash bonus program that rewards CIB Plan participants with additional cash compensation in lockstep with significant increases in the Company’s market capitalization. The CIB Plan is considered “at-risk” because CIB Plan participants will not receive a cash bonus unless the Company’s market capitalization increases significantly and certain other conditions specified in the CIB Plan are met. Specifically, CIB Plan participants will not be paid any cash bonuses unless (1) the Company completes a merger or acquisition transaction that constitutes a sale of ownership of the Company or its assets (a Merger Transaction) or (2) the Compensation Committee determines the Company has sufficient cash on hand, as defined in the CIB Plan. CIB Plan participants will be paid all earned cash bonuses in the event of a Merger Transaction.

Removed

As of December 31, 2022, the Company’s independent directors were participants in the CIB Plan. However, effective March 16, 2023, the Board amended the CIB Plan to remove all independent directors as participants in the CIB Plan and the independent directors consented to such removal. The independent directors’ share of potential benefits under the CIB Plan were completely forfeited to the Company and will not be allocated to any other participant under the CIB Plan. The Company's independent directors have not received, and as a result of such amendment will never receive, any payments under the CIB Plan.

Showing the first 60 of 74 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-07-29 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-05-07 (period ending 2026-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

0new paragraphs
0removed paragraphs
0reworded paragraphs
96 → 96words in section

The section in the latest 10-Q reads in full:

Please refer to “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of our 2025 Annual Report on Form 10‑K for additional information on our current risks. There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The risks and uncertainties described in our 2025 Annual Report on Form 10‑K are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

No wording changes found in this section.

Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

4new paragraphs
1removed paragraphs
26reworded paragraphs
6,322 → 6,518words in section

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: litigation
“General and administrative expenses were $12.7 million and $51.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The 75% decrease was due primarily to a $31.3 million securities litigation loss contingency and other legal loss contingencies of $3.0 million recorded in the first half of 2025 not being repeated in 2026.”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: litigation

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Since inception, we have financed our operations primarily through public and private stock offerings, payments received under collaboration agreements and interest earned on our cash and cash equivalents balances. We intend to continue to use our capital resources to fund research and development activities, capital expenditures, working capital requirements and other general corporate purposes. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, cash and cash equivalents were $86.6$82.7 million. Subsequent to June 30, 2026, we paid our accrued securities litigation loss contingency liability of $31.25 million into a plaintiff's escrow account pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation of Settlement in the Consolidated Securities Action discussed in Note 10 to the "Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements".
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: litigation

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

General and administrative expenses were $6.6$6.1 million and $10.9$40.3 million during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The 39%85% decrease was due primarily to legala $31.3 million securities litigation loss contingencies of $3.0 millioncontingency recorded in the firstsecond quarter of 2025 not being repeated in 2026.
see in full comparison
New text topics: interest rate
“Interest income was $1.5 million and $2.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The decrease in interest income was due primarily to lower interest rates and cash balances in 2026 compared to 2025.”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: interest rate

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

We expect interest income to decrease in future quarters as we continue to utilize cash in our operations and realize the impact of a lower interest rate environment.operations.
see in full comparison
Removed text
“The Company is working expeditiously to address the items identified in the letter. However, as announced on December 18, 2025, the Company no longer expects to initiate a proof-of-concept clinical trial for simufilam in TSC-related epilepsy in the first half of 2026. The updated timing for initiation of a clinical trial will depend on the Company’s ability to provide the requested information to FDA and on satisfactory completion of FDA’s review.”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (31)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 1 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Except for intellectual property licensed from third parties, including pursuant to the License Agreement with Yale, we do not owe royalties or other payments to third parties with respect to our owned patents and patent applications covering simufilam. For more information, please also refer to the section entitled “––License Agreement with Yale.”

Reworded

Dr. Bordey joined the Company as Senior Vice President, Neuroscience, onin May 1, 2025, while continuing her tenured academic position at Yale School of Medicine on a part timepart-time basis. In connection with plans to initiate a clinical program in TSC-related epilepsy, the Company appointed Dr. Joseph Hulihan as Chief Medical Officer in August 2025. Dr. Hulihan, who brings over 25 years of industry experience, devotes approximately half of his professional time to the Company and will advise on the clinical development of simufilam.

Reworded

Based on the results of these studies, the Company filed an Investigational New Drug (IND) application with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in order to initiate a proof-of-concept clinical trial for simufilam in TSC-related epilepsy. On December 15, 2025, the Company received a formal letter from FDA confirming that the proposed clinical trial is on full clinical hold subject to the Company providing FDA with additional information, including additional pre-clinical data, and modifying the protocol design. The Company is working expeditiously to address the items identified in the letter. The timing for initiation of a clinical trial will depend on the Company’s ability to provide the requested information to FDA and on satisfactory completion of FDA’s review.

Removed

The Company is working expeditiously to address the items identified in the letter. However, as announced on December 18, 2025, the Company no longer expects to initiate a proof-of-concept clinical trial for simufilam in TSC-related epilepsy in the first half of 2026. The updated timing for initiation of a clinical trial will depend on the Company’s ability to provide the requested information to FDA and on satisfactory completion of FDA’s review.

Reworded

In exchange for the rights acquired pursuant to the License Agreement, we paid Yale (i) a nominal upfront license fee, and agreed to pay (ii) payments upon the achievement of specified clinical, regulatory and commercial milestones, totaling up to $4.5 million and (iii) upon transfer to a third party of a regulatory priority review voucher, if issued, a low-to-midlow- to mid- double digit percentage of any consideration received for such transfer. We also agreed to pay Yale tiered royalties, ranging from a low- to mid- single digit percentage, on aggregate net sales of licensed products, subject to tiered minimum annual royalty payments ranging from the low- to mid- hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Reworded

Between 2021 and 2025 we enrolled approximately 1,900 patients—including 1,153 patients treated with simufilam during the blinded phase—in two randomized placebo-controlled Phase 3 clinical trials of oral simufilam in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease. The 800 patients enrolled in the first Phase 3 study, called RETHINK-ALZ, received either 100 mg simufilam tablets or placebo twice daily for 52 weeks (NCT04994483). The 1,125 patients enrolled in the second Phase 3 study, called REFOCUS-ALZ, received either 100 mg and 50 mg simufilam tablets or placebo twice daily for 76 weeks (NCT05026177). Patients who completed either of these Phase 3 studies or the 24-month Phase 2 safety study were eligible to enter a 12-month Open Label Extension study in which all patients received simufilam.

Reworded

Throughout both of these Phase 3 trials and the subsequent open-label extension studystudy, simufilam demonstrated a favorable safety profile. The drug’s adverse event profile was comparable to placebo, and no drug-related serious adverse events were observed.

Reworded

We have yet to generate any revenues from product sales. We have an accumulated deficit of $506.4$515.0 million at MarchJune 31,30, 2026. These losses have resulted principally from costs incurred in connection with research and development activities, salaries and other personnel-related costs, legal related costs and general corporate expenses. Research and development activities include costs of clinical and preclinical trials as well as clinical supplies associated with our product candidates. Salaries and other personnel-related costs include stock-based compensation associated with stock options and other equity awards granted to employees and non-employees. Our operating results may fluctuate substantially from period to period as a result of enrollment rates of clinical trials for our product candidates, timing of preclinical activities and our need for clinical supplies.

Reworded

Product revenue will depend on our ability to receive regulatory approvals for, and successfully market, our product candidates. If our development efforts result in regulatory approval and successful commercialization of our product candidates, we expect to generate revenue from direct sales of our drugs and/or, if we license our drugs to future collaborators, from the receipt of license fees and royalties from sales of licensed products. We conduct our research and development programs through a combination of internal and collaborative programs. We rely on arrangements with universities, certain collaborators, contract development and manufacturing organizations (“CDMOs”),organizations, clinical research organizations ("CROs") and clinical research sites for a significant portion of our product development efforts.

Reworded

There have been no material changes to our critical accounting estimates during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 from those described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, as filed with the SEC on March 12, 2026.

Reworded

Results of Operations – Three and Six Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025

Reworded

Research and development expenses were $4.5$3.3 million and $13.7$5.1 million during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. This 67%35% decrease was due primarily to the phase out of the Alzheimer's disease development program, which was completed in the second quarter of 2025.

Added

Research and development expenses were $7.8 million and $18.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. This 58% decrease was due primarily to the phase out of the Alzheimer's disease development program, which was completed in the second quarter of 2025.

Reworded

General and administrative expenses were $6.6$6.1 million and $10.9$40.3 million during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The 39%85% decrease was due primarily to legala $31.3 million securities litigation loss contingencies of $3.0 millioncontingency recorded in the firstsecond quarter of 2025 not being repeated in 2026.

Added

General and administrative expenses were $12.7 million and $51.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The 75% decrease was due primarily to a $31.3 million securities litigation loss contingency and other legal loss contingencies of $3.0 million recorded in the first half of 2025 not being repeated in 2026.

Reworded

Interest income was $0.8$0.7 million and $1.3$1.2 million during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The decrease in interest income was due primarily to lower interest rates and cash balances in 2026 compared to 2025.

Added

Interest income was $1.5 million and $2.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The decrease in interest income was due primarily to lower interest rates and cash balances in 2026 compared to 2025.

Reworded

We expect interest income to decrease in future quarters as we continue to utilize cash in our operations and realize the impact of a lower interest rate environment.operations.

Reworded

We record the activities related to leasing office space to third parties in buildings we own as other income (loss), net, as leasing is not core to the Company’s operations. Other income (loss), net, was $48,000$43,000 and $(82,00046,000) during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.

Added

Other income (loss), net, was $91,000 and $(128,000) during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.

Reworded

We recorded other income in the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 due to improved occupancy rates in 2026 compared to the prior year period. We expect to record modest net income on leasing activities in 2026 due to improved occupancy.

Reworded

Since inception, we have financed our operations primarily through public and private stock offerings, payments received under collaboration agreements and interest earned on our cash and cash equivalents balances. We intend to continue to use our capital resources to fund research and development activities, capital expenditures, working capital requirements and other general corporate purposes. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, cash and cash equivalents were $86.6$82.7 million. Subsequent to June 30, 2026, we paid our accrued securities litigation loss contingency liability of $31.25 million into a plaintiff's escrow account pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation of Settlement in the Consolidated Securities Action discussed in Note 10 to the "Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements".

Reworded

There were no common stock sales under the ATM during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 or the year ended December 31, 2025.

Reworded

No cash payments were authorized or made to participants under the CIB Plan as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, or through the filing date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Reworded

Net cash used in operating activities was $8.9$12.7 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, resulting primarily from a net loss of $10.3$18.9 million as well as decreases in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $2.5$2.4 million and accrued compensation and benefits of $1.4$1.2 million. These factors were partially offset by a decrease in prepaid and other current assets of $0.9$1.2 million. There was also a non-cash adjustment for stock-based compensation expense of $4.1$8.1 million.

Reworded

Net cash used in operating activities was $11.3$16.3 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, resulting primarily from a net loss of $23.4$67.6 million. ImpactsThis fromchange this net loss werewas partially offset by an increase in accrued development expense of $1.6$1.3 million, an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $35.2 million and a decrease in prepaid and other current assets of $5.1$5.5 million,million. andThere was also a non-cash adjustment for stock-based compensation expense of $5.2$9.8 million.

Reworded

There was minimal or no net cash used in investing activities during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025.

Reworded

Net cash used in financing activities during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was $51,000$67,000 for costs related to the ATM. There were no sales of common stock under the ATM during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.

Reworded

Net cash provided by financing activities during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 was $90,000 of proceeds from the exercise of stock options.

Reworded

We own an office complex in Austin, Texas, a portion of which serves as our corporate headquarters. Maintenance, physical facilities, leasing, property management and other key responsibilities related to property ownership are outsourced to professional real-estate managers. The office complex measures approximately 90,000 rentable square feet. At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we occupied approximately 25% of the property with the remainder either leased or available for lease to third parties. We expect to record modest net income on leasing activities in 2026 due to improved occupancy compared to the prior year.

Reworded

We have an accumulated deficit of $506.4$515.0 million as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026. We expect our cash requirements to be significant in the future. The amount and timing of our future cash requirements will depend on regulatory and market acceptance of our drug candidates, the resources we devote to researching and developing, formulating, manufacturing, commercializing and supporting our products and other corporate needs. We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to fund our operations for at least the next 12 months. We may seek additional future funding through public or private financing in the future, if such funding is available and on terms acceptable to us. However, there are no assurances that additional financing will be available on favorable terms, or at all.

FLNA insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 2 Form 4 filings (1 insider, 3 trade dates, 399,904 shares, about $356.3K) and open-market sales in 0 filings. Net open-market shares: 399,904 (purchases minus sales); net value about $356.3K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2026-09-30Barry Richard
Director, President & CEO
Open-market purchase 100,000$0.92 $92.0K1,337,964 SEC
2026-09-29Barry Richard
Director, President & CEO
Open-market purchase 206,813$0.90 $186.1K1,237,964 SEC
2026-09-28Barry Richard
Director, President & CEO
Open-market purchase 93,091$0.84 $78.2K1,031,151 SEC

Well-known investors holding FLNA (13F)

InvestorQuarterSharesReported value% of their 13FChange vs prior quarter
Two Sigma Investments COM2026-06-301,711,358$2.0M0.0%Reduced 14%
D. E. Shaw & Co. COM2026-06-30485,025$577.2K0.0%Reduced 13%
Renaissance Technologies COM2026-06-30389,601$463.6K0.0%Added 19%
Millennium Management (Israel Englander) COM2026-06-3072,588$122.7K—Sold out
Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) COM2026-06-3011,575$13.8K0.0%Reduced 70%

13F reports are filed up to 45 days after quarter end and show long U.S. equity positions only; options positions are omitted here.

Coming soon: email alerts when FLNA files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.