FRPH 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Frp Holdings, Inc. · Nasdaq · Real Estate · CIK 844059 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Current economic and market conditions, including, but not limited to, elevated interest rates, new and expanded tariffs, a decline in consumer confidence and spending, inflationary conditions that have increased the costs of operating our businesses (including raw materials, products, labor, and freight), widespread supply chain disruptions, has and could continue to adversely impact gross margins, operating margins, and the results of the Company’s operating businesses.”
New heading “Investments by the Company in real estate developments directly or through joint ventures expose it to market and economic risks inherent in the real estate construction and development industry.”
New heading “Unexpected events, such as public health issues, natural disasters, geopolitical conflicts, civil unrest, severe weather and terrorist activities, may disrupt the Company’s operations and increase our costs.”
New heading “The Company’s Bylaws contain an exclusive forum provision, which could impair the ability of shareholders to obtain a favorable judicial forum for certain disputes with the Company or its directors, officers or other employees and be cost-prohibitive to shareholders.”
Removed heading “Construction costs may be higher than anticipated.”
Largest changes
“Current economic and market conditions are highly uncertain and volatile as a result of various factors, including elevated interest rates, new and expanded tariffs, a decline in consumer confidence and spending, inflationary conditions, the threat of government shut downs, and supply chain disruptions, which have been exacerbated by the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the fighting in the Middle East, as well as piracy in shipping lanes. …”see in full comparison
“Current economic and market conditions, including, but not limited to, elevated interest rates, new and expanded tariffs, a decline in consumer confidence and spending, inflationary conditions that have increased the costs of operating our businesses (including raw materials, products, labor, and freight), widespread supply chain disruptions, has and could continue to adversely impact gross margins, operating margins, and the results of the Company’s operating businesses.”see in full comparison
“The Company’s Bylaws contain an exclusive forum provision which provides that, unless its Board of Directors consents to the selection of an alternative forum, the Circuit Court located in Duval County, Florida or the federal district court for the Middle District of Florida will be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the corporation, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director or officer or other employee of the corporation to the corporation or the corporation’s shareholders, (iii) any action …”see in full comparison
“Contracted labor is one of the primary components of our expenses. Several factors may adversely affect the labor force available to our contractors or increase their labor costs, including labor shortages, increased competition for qualified employees, and laws and regulations related to minimum wages, including the potential implementation of increases in the statutory minimum salary requirements for employees who are not required to be paid overtime compensation. …”see in full comparison
“The Company has experienced significant increases in commodity and labor prices and insurance costs, and such increases may be further impacted by the implementation of additional tariffs on building materials sourced from international markets. In addition, higher interest rates have increased the cost of the Company’s outstanding indebtedness and the costs of financing for new development projects. …”see in full comparison
“The occurrence of one or more unexpected events, including public health issues, tsunamis, hurricanes, earthquakes, floods and other forms of severe weather or civil unrest, geopolitical conflicts (including the conflict between Ukraine and Russia as well as the conflict in the Middle East) and/or terrorist activities in countries or regions in which our customers, assets, suppliers or our operating businesses are located could adversely affect our operations and financial performance.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (34)
Current economic and market conditions, including, but not limited to, elevated interest rates, new and expanded tariffs, a decline in consumer confidence and spending, inflationary conditions that have increased the costs of operating our businesses (including raw materials, products, labor, and freight), widespread supply chain disruptions, has and could continue to adversely impact gross margins, operating margins, and the results of the Company’s operating businesses.
Current economic and market conditions are highly uncertain and volatile as a result of various factors, including elevated interest rates, new and expanded tariffs, a decline in consumer confidence and spending, inflationary conditions, the threat of government shut downs, and supply chain disruptions, which have been exacerbated by the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the fighting in the Middle East, as well as piracy in shipping lanes. We believe these factors have created economic uncertainty which may negatively affect our operating results by, among other things: (i) increasing the cost of raw materials and finished goods such as steel and lumber for our development projects, increasing interest expense on variable rate debt and any new debt, (ii) decreasing gross margins and investment returns due to increased costs of construction and maintenance, (iii) reducing the availability of debt and equity capital for new real estate investments and the number of real estate development projects meeting the Company’s investment criteria and (iv) increasing overall operating expenses due to increases in labor and service costs. These factors also may impact our industrial tenants by increasing their borrowing costs, reducing consumer demand for certain imported products and increasing labor and service costs.
The Company has experienced significant increases in commodity and labor prices and insurance costs, and such increases may be further impacted by the implementation of additional tariffs on building materials sourced from international markets. In addition, higher interest rates have increased the cost of the Company’s outstanding indebtedness and the costs of financing for new development projects. Higher rates have also had an adverse impact on the availability of financing, and the anticipated profitability of development projects, as capitalization rates related to multifamily apartment communities are generally impacted by interest rates. These factors may have an adverse impact on the Company’s operating results in future periods, particularly if higher development and construction costs continue and debt and equity financing is not available for new projects or is only available on less attractive terms.
Contracted labor is one of the primary components of our expenses. Several factors may adversely affect the labor force available to our contractors or increase their labor costs, including labor shortages, increased competition for qualified employees, and laws and regulations related to minimum wages, including the potential implementation of increases in the statutory minimum salary requirements for employees who are not required to be paid overtime compensation. A sustained labor shortage or increased turnover rates, whether caused by wage inflation or general economic conditions, natural disasters or other factors, could lead to increased costs for future development projects, which could in turn negatively affect our operations or adversely impact our business and results.
In addition, electricity prices have been increasing and are expected to continue to increase due to the rapid expansion of data centers for artificial intelligence.
Investments by the Company in real estate developments directly or through joint ventures expose it to market and economic risks inherent in the real estate construction and development industry.
The real estate construction and development industry is highly competitive and subject to numerous risks which may be beyond management’s control. The success of the Company’s investments in real estate developments is dependent on many factors, including:
•Changes in capitalization rates impacting real estate values;
•Availability and reasonable pricing of labor;
•Availability and reasonable pricing of construction materials, such as steel, lumber, framing, concrete and other building materials, including increases associated with tariffs and supply chain disruptions;
•Changes in laws and regulations for new construction and land entitlements, including environmental and zoning laws and regulations;
•Natural disasters and severe weather conditions increasing costs, delaying construction, causing uninsured losses or reducing demand;
•Availability and cost of insurance;
•Availability of land in desirable locations at prices that result in an economically viable project;
•Delays and costs associated with obtaining permits, approvals or licenses necessary to develop property;
•Availability of property for development at attractive prices;
•Availability and cost of financing;
•Risk of losses resulting from cost overrun guarantees in joint venture projects sponsored by the Company or the failure of such properties to achieve profitability or a profitable exit; and
•Real estate market values and general economic conditions.
Any of these factors could give rise to delays in the start or completion of a project, increase the cost of developing a project, or result in reduced prices and values and significant losses.
A decline in the economic conditions in Baltimoreour and Washington, D.C.core markets could adversely affect our business.
The majority of our stabilized properties are located in the Baltimore areaarea, Washington, D.C., and Washington,Greenville, D.C.South Carolina. We are, therefore, subject to increased exposure to (positive or negative) economic factors and other competitive factors specific to markets in confined geographic areas. Our operations may also be affected if too many competing properties are built in these markets. An economic downturn in these markets resulting from factors outside of our control could adversely affect our operation. Such a downturn could be triggered by such factors as the downsizing or relocation of government jobs, crime, acts of terrorism, or natural disasters. We cannot be sure that these markets will continue to grow or demand the type of assets in our portfolio.
The Trump administration has created an initiative known as the Department of Governmental Efficiency focused on reducing government expenditures. The initiative is expected to lead to a reduction of a significant number of government jobs in the Washington, D.C. region; however, the potential impact of this initiative on the demand for our residential properties in the region cannot be determined at this time.
We conduct a significant portion of our operations through joint ventures, which may lead to disagreements with our joint venture partners and adversely affect our interests in the joint ventures.ventures, may expose us to liability under completion guarantees and impose development management responsibilities on us in certain joint ventures in which we are a minority partner.
Moreover, in certain cases the Company is exposed to potential liability under repayment, construction completion and cost overrun guarantees made by the Company. Also, with our recent acquisition of Altman Logistics, we have assumed development management responsibilities for management projects in which we have a minority interest, which may create additional risks if we fail to perform to the satisfaction of our joint venture partners.
Climate change presents an array of risks to real estate companies due to sea level rise, flooding, extreme weather, strongerchanging stormsweather patterns and ocean currents, stronger storms, human migration.migration, and supply chain disruptions. A significant number of our properties are located in areas that are susceptible to hurricanes, tropical storms, flooding, sea level rise and other natural disasters. We have accounted for the risk of flooding and sea level rise in the design of our Riverfront on the Anacostia development. Future developments, including potential “second life” uses of our mining properties, could be impacted by these factors and the impacts that they have on human behavior. Weather conditions could disrupt the business of our tenants, which may affect the ability of some tenants to pay rent and/or their willingness to remain in or move to affected areas. [Additionally, the cost of insurance associated with our properties has increased, and future weather conditions may cause premiums to increase in the future.]
We self-insure for claims exposure outside of our coverage resulting from property damage, workers’ compensation, auto liability, general liability and employees’ health insurance. We also are responsible for our legal expenses relating to such claims. We maintain insurance above the amounts for which we self-insure with licensed insurance carriers. Although we believe the aggregate insurance limits should be sufficient to cover reasonably expected claims, it is possible that one or more claims could exceed our aggregate coverage limits. Additionally, there are certain losses, such as losses from hurricanes, terrorism, wars or earthquakes, where insurance is limited or not economically justifiable. If the Company experiences an uninsured loss of real property, we could lose both the invested capital and anticipated revenues associated with such property. We accrue currently for estimated incurred losses and expenses and periodically evaluate and adjust our claims’ accrued liability to reflect our experience. However, ultimate results may differ from our estimates, which could result in losses greater than accrued amounts.
We use debt to finance our operations, including acquisitions of properties. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had outstanding non-recourse mortgageconsolidated indebtedness of $180,070,000,$193,958,000, secured by developed real estate properties having a carrying value of $239,436,000.$276,460,000. Our use of debt may have adverse consequences, including the following:
Unexpected events, such as public health issues, natural disasters, geopolitical conflicts, civil unrest, severe weather and terrorist activities, may disrupt the Company’s operations and increase our costs.
The occurrence of one or more unexpected events, including public health issues, tsunamis, hurricanes, earthquakes, floods and other forms of severe weather or civil unrest, geopolitical conflicts (including the conflict between Ukraine and Russia as well as the conflict in the Middle East) and/or terrorist activities in countries or regions in which our customers, assets, suppliers or our operating businesses are located could adversely affect our operations and financial performance.
Construction costs may be higher than anticipated.
Our long-term business plan includes a number of construction projects. The construction costs of these projects may exceed original estimates and possibly make the completion of a property uneconomical. The imposition of tariffs on foreign building materials such as lumber, building material commodity shortages, supply chain disruptions, construction delays or stoppages or rapidly escalating construction costs may out-pace market rents, which would adversely affect our profits. The market environment may not allow us to raise rents to cover these higher costs.
The Company’s Bylaws contain an exclusive forum provision, which could impair the ability of shareholders to obtain a favorable judicial forum for certain disputes with the Company or its directors, officers or other employees and be cost-prohibitive to shareholders.
The Company’s Bylaws contain an exclusive forum provision which provides that, unless its Board of Directors consents to the selection of an alternative forum, the Circuit Court located in Duval County, Florida or the federal district court for the Middle District of Florida will be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the corporation, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director or officer or other employee of the corporation to the corporation or the corporation’s shareholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim against the corporation or any director or officer or other employee of the corporation arising pursuant to any provision of the Florida Business Corporation Act or the corporation’s articles of incorporation or bylaws (as either may be amended from time to time), or (iv) any action asserting a claim against the corporation or any director or officer or other employee of the corporation governed by the internal affairs doctrine. Notwithstanding the foregoing, shareholders cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. The exclusive forum provision may limit a shareholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with the Company or its directors, officers or other employees or be cost-prohibitive to shareholders, which may discourage such lawsuits against the Company or its directors, officers and other employees. However, there is uncertainty regarding whether a court would enforce the exclusive forum provision. If a court were to find the exclusive forum provision to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, the Company may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and operating results.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
Information required in response to Item 7 is included under the caption "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation" on pages 10 through 21 of the Company’s 2025 Annual Report to Shareholders, and such information is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 7.A QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Interest Rate Risk - We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes through our SOFR variable-rate borrowings. If SOFR had been 100 basis points higher during 2025 interest incurred would have increased by approximately $40,000.
The following table presents the principal cash flow payments associated with our outstanding consolidated debt by year, weighted average interest rates on debt outstanding each year-end, and fair value of total debt as of December 31, 2025 (dollars in thousands):
Largest changes
“Interest Rate Risk - We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes through our variable-rate borrowings under our Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo. Under the Wells Fargo Credit Agreement, the applicable margin for borrowings at December 31, 2024 was Daily Simple SOFR plus 2.25%. There were no borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2024, so a sensitivity analysis was not performed to determine the impact of hypothetical changes in interest rates on the Company’s results of operations and cash flows.”see in full comparison
“Interest Rate Risk - We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes through our SOFR variable-rate borrowings. If SOFR had been 100 basis points higher during 2025 interest incurred would have increased by approximately $40,000.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (2)
Interest Rate Risk - We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes through our SOFR variable-rate borrowings. If SOFR had been 100 basis points higher during 2025 interest incurred would have increased by approximately $40,000.
Interest Rate Risk - We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes through our variable-rate borrowings under our Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo. Under the Wells Fargo Credit Agreement, the applicable margin for borrowings at December 31, 2024 was Daily Simple SOFR plus 2.25%. There were no borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2024, so a sensitivity analysis was not performed to determine the impact of hypothetical changes in interest rates on the Company’s results of operations and cash flows.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
No wording changes found in this section.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”
New heading “Equity Method Investments.”
New heading “Six Month Highlights”
New heading “Comparative Results of Operations for the Six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”
New heading “Consolidated Results”
New heading “Multifamily Segment (Pro rata consolidated and pro rata unconsolidated)”
New heading “Multifamily Segment (Consolidated - Dock 79 and The Maren)”
New heading “Multifamily Segment (Pro rata unconsolidated)”
New heading “Industrial and Commercial Segment”
New heading “Mining Royalty Lands Segment Results”
New heading “Development Segment Results”
Largest changes
“The following discussion includes non-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of Regulation G promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission to supplement the financial results as reported in accordance with GAAP. The non-GAAP financial measures discussed are operating profit before G&A and pro rata net operating income (NOI), adjusted pro rata net operating income, and adjusted net income. The Company uses these metrics to analyze its continuing operations and to monitor, assess, and identify meaningful trends in its operating and financial performance. …”see in full comparison
“The following discussion includes non-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of Regulation G promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission to supplement the financial results as reported in accordance with GAAP. The non-GAAP financial measures discussed are operating profit before G&A and pro rata net operating income (NOI). The Company uses these metrics to analyze its continuing operations and to monitor, assess, and identify meaningful trends in its operating and financial performance. These measures are not, and should not be viewed as, a substitute for GAAP financial measures. …”see in full comparison
“Comparative Results of Operations for the Six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”see in full comparison
“Multifamily Segment (Pro rata consolidated and pro rata unconsolidated)”see in full comparison
“The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes in Item 1 and with the audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in our annual report on Form 10-K. The statements in this discussion regarding industry outlook, our expectations regarding our future performance, liquidity and capital resources and other non-historical statements in this discussion are forward-looking statements. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (82)
The following discussion and analysis addresses material changes in the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (“Form 10-Q”), as well as the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on April 15, 2026 (the “2025 Annual Report”). Unless the context otherwise requires, “the Company,” “FRP,” “we,” “us,” “our,” and “ours” refer to FRP Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes in Item 1 and with the audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in our annual report on Form 10-K. The statements in this discussion regarding industry outlook, our expectations regarding our future performance, liquidity and capital resources and other non-historical statements in this discussion are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including the risks and uncertainties described in “Forward-Looking Statements” below and “Risk Factors” on page 5 of our annual report on Form 10-K. Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statements. We assume no obligation to revise or publicly release any revision to any forward-looking statements contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, unless required by law.
The following discussion includes non-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of Regulation G promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission to supplement the financial results as reported in accordance with GAAP. The non-GAAP financial measures discussed are operating profit before G&A and pro rata net operating income (NOI), adjusted pro rata net operating income, and adjusted net income. The Company uses these metrics to analyze its continuing operations and to monitor, assess, and identify meaningful trends in its operating and financial performance. These measures are not, and should not be viewed as, a substitute for GAAP financial measures. Refer to “Non-GAAP Financial Measure” below in this quarterly report for a more detailed discussion, including reconciliations of this non-GAAP financial measure to its most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The following discussion includes non-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of Regulation G promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission to supplement the financial results as reported in accordance with GAAP. The non-GAAP financial measures discussed are operating profit before G&A and pro rata net operating income (NOI). The Company uses these metrics to analyze its continuing operations and to monitor, assess, and identify meaningful trends in its operating and financial performance. These measures are not, and should not be viewed as, a substitute for GAAP financial measures. Refer to “Non-GAAP Financial Measure” below in this quarterly report for a more detailed discussion, including reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Multifamily segment included six stabilized joint ventures which own and manage apartment buildings and any associated retail. These assets create revenue and cash flows through tenant rental payments and reimbursements for building operating costs. The Company’s residential units typically lease for 12 – 15-month lease terms. If no notice to move out or renew is made, then the leases go month-to-month until notification of termination or renewal is received. Renewal terms are typically 9 – 12 months. The Company also leases retail spaces at apartment/mixed-use properties. The retail leases are typically 10 - 15-year leases with options to renew for another five years. Retail leases at these properties also include percentage rents which collect on average 3-6% of annual sales when a tenant exceeds a breakpoint stipulated by each individual lease. All base rent revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis. The major cash outlays incurred in this segment are for property taxes, full service maintenance, property management, utilities and marketing. The six multifamily properties are as follows:
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Industrial and Commercial Segment includes five commercial properties owned by the Company in fee simple as follows:
2)155 E. 21st Street in Duval County, FL was anformerly prior officea building property (now a vacant parcel) that remained under lease through March 31, 2026. The lease expired April 1, 2026 and this vacant parcel has minimal value.
3)Cranberry Run Business Park in Harford County, MD consists of five industrial buildings totaling 267,737 square feet which are 43.4%49.0% leased and 43.4% occupied. The property is subject to commercial leases with various tenants.
Our Mining Royalty Lands segment owns several properties comprising approximately 16,640 acres currently under lease for mining rents or royalties (excluding the 4,280 acres owned by our Brooksville joint venture with Vulcan Materials). Other than one location in Virginia, all of these properties are located in Florida and Georgia. The Company leases land under long-term leases that grant the lessee the right to mine and sell sand and stone deposits from our property in exchange for royalty payments. A typical lease has an option to extend the lease for additional terms. The typical lease in this segment requires the tenant to pay us a royalty based on the number of tons of mined materials sold from our property during a given fiscal year multiplied by a percentage of the average annual sales price per ton sold. As a result of this royalty payment structure, we do not bear the cost risks associated with the mining operations, however, we are subject to the cyclical nature of the construction markets in these states as both volumes and prices tend to fluctuate through those cycles. In certain locations, typically where the sand and stone deposits on our property have been depleted but the tenant still has a need for the leased land, we collect a minimum annual rental amount. In the year ended December 31, 2025,2025 aggregateand six months ending June 30, 2026, royalty tons sold were 9.04 million.million and 4.9 million, respectively.
The major expenses in this segment are comprised of collection and accounting for royalties, management’s oversight of the mining leases, land entitlement for post-mining uses and property taxes at our non-leased locations and at our Grandin location which, unlike our other leased mining locations, are not entirely paid by the tenant. As such, our costs in this business are very low as a percentage of revenue, are relatively stable and are not affected by increases in production at our locations. Our current mining tenants are Vulcan Materials, Martin Marietta, Cemex, Summit MaterialsQuikrete and The Concrete Company.
In late 2023, the Central Florida Expressway Authority (CFX) used its eminent domain power to take title to approximately 27.6 acres from the southern boundary of a parcel of the Company’s approximately 1,196-acre Lake Louisa property that is leased to Cemex. As required by Florida law, CFX deposited $2,582,000 into the registry of the Court, representing CFX’s good faith estimate of the value of the condemned property. As the Company’s tenant, Cemex is claiming a portion of the funds ultimately paid by CFX as business damages. The Company is litigating with CFX over the value of the condemned property. The condemnation proceeding is not expected to impact the lease with Cemex.
At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, this segment owned the following future development parcels:
At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, this segment was invested in the following development parcels:
1)Riverfront on the Anacostia: The Riverfront on the Anacostia property is a 5.8-acre parcel of real estate in Washington, D.C. that fronts the Anacostia River and is adjacent to the Washington Nationals Baseball Park. A revised Planned Unit Development (PUD) plan was approved in 2012 and permitted the Company to develop, in four phases, a four-building, mixed-use project, containing approximately 1,161,050 square feet. The approved development includes numerous publicly accessible open spaces and a waterfront esplanade along the Anacostia River. Phase 1I and 2II (Dock 79 & The Maren) are in the multifamily segment. The final two phases, Phase 3III and Phase 4IV obtained second-stage PUD approval on October 10, 2025, permitting approximately 602,553 square feet of apartments (~590 units) with first floor retail. The PUD requires Phase 4IV construction to commence within 3 years and commencing Phase 3III construction within 3 years after obtaining the Phase 4IV certificate of occupancy. Phase IV under entitlement consisting of 281 units and 6,000 sq ft of ground-floor retail. The net book value of this property is $9.3$9.9 million.
4)Windlass Run: In March 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with St. Johns Properties Inc., a Baltimore development company, to jointly develop the remaining lands of our Windlass Run Business Park, located in Middle River, MD, into a multi-building business park consisting of approximately 329,000 square feet of single-story office and retail space. The project will take place in several phases. Construction of the first phase, which includes two office buildings and two retail buildings totaling 100,030-square-feet (inclusive of 27,950 retail), commenced in the fourth quarter of 2017 and was completed in January 2019. At MarchJune 31,30, 2026 Phase I was 87.2% leased and occupied. In 2024, the partnership agreed to spend up to $1.0 million dollars to amend and modify 218,620 square feet of office and retail development for 153 for rent residential units, up to four (4) one-acre retail lots for ground lease opportunities, and maintain the flexibility to construct a single-story office building totaling 21,760 square feet.
8)Woven: In August 2023, the Company entered into an agreement with Woodfield Development for the acquisition and development our third multifamily project in Greenville, SC. On May 30, 2025, we secured construction financing for the $87.8M project with 214 units and 13,500 square feet of ground floor retail that is eligible to receive South Carolina Textile Rehabilitation Credits upon substantial completion and received Special Source Credits equal to 50% of the real estate taxes for a period of 20 years. The project broke ground during the 3rd quarter of 2025 and substantial completion of the project is expected in late 2027.
9)We entered into two new joint venture agreements in early 2024 with Altman Logistics. The first joint venture is a 201,420 square-foot warehouse development project in Lakeland, FL, and the second joint venture is a two building 183,215 square-foot warehouse redevelopment project in Broward County, FL. We closed on both construction loans in March, 2025 and construction commenced in the second quarter of 2025. Substantial completion of both projects is expected in the secondthird quarter of 2026. On October 21, 2025 we purchased the interests of Altman Logistics in these two joint ventures and now own 100% of both of these projects.
Equity Method Investments.
The major classes of assets, liabilities and equity of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 are summarized in the following two tables (in thousands):
The following table presents the calculation of the Company's pro rata share of certain balance sheet items by segment as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026:
FirstSecond Quarter Financial Highlights
•Net loss attributable to the Company of ($0.7$0.3) million vs $1.7$0.6 million net income primarily due to $1.5$0.8 million increase in G&A, $0.9$1.1 million lower interest income, and lower occupancy in our Multifamily and Industrial segments.
•5%3% decrease in pro rata NOI ($8.9$9.4 million vs $9.4$9.7 million) driven by lower occupancy and elevated costs in the Multifamily segment,and Industrial and Commercial segments, partially offset by strong Mining Royalty Lands performance.
•12%9% decrease in the Multifamily segment’s pro rata NOI primarily due to lower occupancyoccupancy, higher rent concessions, bad debts, and higheroperating costsexpenses at our DC assets.
•15%12% increase in Mining Royalty Lands segment NOI driven by a 7.9%6.8% rise in royaltiesroyalty tons and a 6.5%5.4% increase in royalty revenue per ton.
Second quarter results continued to reflect the occupancy pressure we flagged exiting last year across our DC multifamily assets and the Maryland industrial portfolio, alongside higher G&A tied to the Altman integration. Mining royalties again posted double-digit NOI growth, and our development pipeline continues to advance, with the Hamilton and Parsippany, New Jersey merchant build projects reaching substantial completion this quarter. Same-store leasing is the single most important lever we have to improve the company's performance — it has the most immediate impact and requires very little capital relative to development. To say it is management’s top priority understates the extent to which our day-to-day revolves around it. The activity and engagement with potential tenants remains high, especially compared to last year. While that did not translate into signed leases this quarter, we believe that if we focus on what we can control and execute, the results we are looking for will come. Our priorities remain unchanged: lease the Maryland industrial portfolio, stabilize occupancy across the DC multifamily assets, and deliver our active development projects on schedule.
The headwinds we experienced last year continued to affect results into this year’s first quarter. Oversupply in DC multifamily continues to hamper rent growth and occupancy levels while expenses have risen unabated. We still have significant vacancies in our industrial assets in Maryland, which combined with the increase in general and administrative expense associated with the Altman acquisition have served to put downward pressure on earnings and NOI compared to the same period last year, mitigated to some extent by the increases in mining royalties. None of these factors are new developments, and our focus on leasing remains the same. What is new is the activity in the leasing space this year relative to 2025, which management finds particularly heartening. Same store occupancy levels and rent growth are perhaps our most important driver for earnings, FFO, and NOI growth, because they require very little in capex and the impact is nearly immediate. Looking forward to the rest of 2026, our focus in the near-term is capitalizing on the increase in leasing activity to bolster our same store assets and return occupancy back to historic norms; control and minimize expenses in our multifamily assets where possible to limit the impact of a soft market; and finally execute on the industrial assets we have under development to set the company up for future growth.
Comparative Results of Operations for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025
Net loss attributable to the Company for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was $(687,000259,000) or $(.04.01) per share versus income of $1,710,000$578,000 or $.09$.03 per share in the same period last year. Pro rata NOI for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was $8,861,000$9,371,000 versus $9,364,000$9,688,000 in the same period last year. The firstsecond quarter of 2026 was impacted by the following items:
•Operating profit decreased $1,813,000$198,000 primarilyor due to $1,508,000 higher General & administrative costs. G&A costs included $311,000 higher audit fees, $173,000 of valuation and accounting consulting fees, $110,000 of IT consulting, and higher wages, all primarily related to the Altman acquisition.12%. The consolidated portion of the Multifamily segment (Dock/Maren) decreased $357,000$274,000 due to uncollectablelower revenueoccupancy, rent concessions, and higher operating expenses and property taxes.costs. The Industrial and Commercial segment operating profit declined $462,000 with $298,000$446,000 due mainly to $218,000lease of depreciation and $80,000 of carrying costs on our Chelsea spec warehouse placed in service in April 2025 along with non-renewing leases.expirations. Mining Royalty Land's segment operating profit increased $432,000$339,000 due to higher royalty tons and revenues less related depletion. Development segment operating profit increased $82,000$985,000 due to joint venture management fee revenues ($195,000), and the prior year including Altman acquisition expenses ($713,000), partially offset by less capitalized real estate taxes.taxes ($65,000). General & administrative costs increased $802,000 due to higher personnel costs ($901,000, primarily Altman acquisition related), increased legal fees related to replacing our equity incentive plan, the acquisition, and other one-time events ($111,000), higher acquisition-related IT and other professional fees ($94,000), partially offset by increased labor capitalization ($328,000).
•Net investment income decreased $873,000$1,111,000 because of reduced earnings on cash equivalents ($650,000$619,000) due to lower balances and interest rates and lower income from our lending ventures ($223,000$492,000) on smaller loan balances outstanding.outstanding and fewer residential lots sold.
•Interest expense decreased $123,000 compared to the same period last year as we capitalized $243,000 more interest partially offset by the interest expense on our Wells Fargo Credit Agreement. More interest was capitalized due to increased in-house and joint venture projects under development this quarter compared to last year.
•Equity in loss of joint ventures was an unfavorable $40,000 due to losses at recently completed industrial properties ($119,000), mostly offset by improved results at other joint venture properties.
•Equity in loss of joint ventures was an unfavorable $584,000 due to higher losses at Bryant Street ($437,000) and Verge ($128,000) both due to lower revenues and higher expenses. Bryant Street expenses included $125,000 for exploratory refinancing costs and $40,000 for the annual tax returns.
•Pro rata NOI decreased $503,000$317,000 driven by declines in the Multifamily segment NOI ($546,000$421,000), and Industrial segment ($381,000), and Development segment ($74,000$394,000), partially offset by higherincreases in Mining Royalty segment NOI($453,000) and Development segment ($498,000$45,000).
The combined consolidated and unconsolidated pro rata net operating income this quarter for this segment was $4,084,000,$4,316,000, down $546,000$421,000 or 12%9% compared to $4,630,000$4,737,000 in the same quarter last year. Most of this decrease was due to lower occupancyoccupancy, higher rent concessions, bad debts, and higheroperating costsexpenses at our DC assets.
Total revenues for our two consolidated joint ventures (Dock 79/Maren) were $5,195,000,$5,439,000, a decrease of $229,000$128,000 versus $5,424,000$5,567,000 in the same period last year primarily due to lower occupancy and higher rent concessions. Total operating profit before G&A for the consolidated joint ventures was $852,000,$1,183,000, a decrease of $357,000,$274,000, or 30%19% versus $1,209,000$1,457,000 in the same period last year primarily due to lower revenues along with higher operating costs.costs and recent capital improvements depreciation.
For our four unconsolidated joint ventures, pro rata revenues were $5,181,000,$5,241,000, a decrease of $168,000$195,000 or 3%4% compared to $5,349,000$5,436,000 in the same period last year. Pro rata operating profit before G&A was $313,000,$437,000, a decrease of $438,000$134,000 or 58%23% versus $751,000$571,000 in the same period last year. The decrease was primarily due to lower occupancyoccupancy, athigher Thebad Vergedebts, and higherincreased costs at Bryant Street.Street and The Verge.
Shell construction on our 258,279 square foot spec warehouse project in Aberdeen, MD on Chelsea Road was completed effective April 1, 2025 and is in the lease-up phase. We have ten buildings in service at four different locations totaling 773,356 square feet of industrial (includes 258,279 square foot Chelsea building completed April 1, 2025) and 33,708 square feet of office of which 59.3%49.4% was leased and 47.5% was occupied at MarchJune 31,30, 2026. Excluding Chelsea (100% vacant), these assets were 69.9% leased and occupied during the quarter compared to 85.2%77.9% leased and occupied during the same quarter last year primarily due to an eviction and lease expirations. Total revenues in this segment were $1,200,000,$983,000, down $147,000$391,000 or 11%,28%, over the same period last year. Operating profitloss before G&A was $181,000,$3,000, down $462,000$446,000 or 72%101% over the profit in the same quarter last year due to $218,000the oflower depreciationoccupancy and $80,000 ofhigher operating costs atprimarily Chelsearelated alongto witha thereal lowerestate occupancy.tax appeal and leasing activity. Net operating income in this segment was $758,000,$616,000, down $381,000$394,000 or 33%39% compared to the same quarter last year.
Total revenues in this segment were $3,717,000,$4,066,000, an increase of $483,000$457,000 or 15%13% versus $3,234,000$3,609,000 in the same period last year. Royalty tons were up 7.9%.6.8% over the same period last year. Royalty revenue per ton increased 6.5%5.4% over the same period last year. Total operating profit before G&A in this segment was $3,397,000,$3,679,000, an increase of $432,000$339,000 versus $2,965,000$3,340,000 in the same period last year. Net operating income was $3,782,000,$4,118,000, up $498,000$453,000 or 15%12% compared to the same quarter last year.
Joint venture management fee revenues primarily represent fees earned from the Company's three minority ownership warehouse projects acquired October 21, 2025. The prior year operating expenses included $713,000 of Altman acquisition expenses. Property taxes increased because Phase III at Riverfront received second-stage PUD approval on October 10, 2025 and is not currently in development; accordingly, carrying costs are now being expensed rather than capitalized.
▪We are the principal capital source to develop 344 residential lots on 110 acres in Harford County, MD. We have funded $28.1$28.7 million of our $31.1 million total commitment. A national homebuilder is under contract to purchase all 222 townhome lots and 122 single family lots. AtCumulatively quarter-end,as 228of June 30, 2026, 248 lots have been sold andfor $30.0$32.5 million has been returned to the company of which $7.1$7.4 million was booked as profit to the Company.
▪We entered into two new joint venture agreements in early 2024 with Altman Logistics. The first joint venture is a 201,420 square-foot warehouse development project in Lakeland, FL, and the second joint venture is a two building 183,215 square-foot warehouse redevelopment project in Broward County, FL. We closed on both construction loans in March, 2025 and construction commenced in the second quarter of 2025. Substantial completion of both projects is expected in the secondthird quarter of 2026. On October 21, 2025 we purchased the interests of Altman Logistics.Logistics and now 100% of these two assets.
▪On May 30, 2025, we secured construction financing for our multifamily joint venture with Woodfield Development, known as Woven. This is our third multifamily project in Greenville, SC. This is an $87.8M$87.8 million project with 214 units and 13,500 square feet of ground floor retail that is eligible to receive South Carolina Textile Rehabilitation Credits upon substantial completion and received Special Source Credits equal to 50% of the real estate taxes for a period of 20 years. The project broke ground during the 3rd quarter of 2025 and substantial completion of the project is expected in late 2027.
▪On July 23,2025,23, 2025, we entered into a joint venture agreement with Strategic Real Estate Partners (“SREP”), a private real estate development firm which specializes in industrial real estate development, to develop 377,892 square feet in two warehouses in Lake County, Florida near Orlando, with options for investment in additional industrial warehouses on adjacent properties in the future. Substantial completion of the first warehouse is expected in the first quarter of 2027.
▪On October 21, 2025, the Company completed the closing on its Purchase and Sales Agreement to acquire the business operations and development pipeline of Altman Logistics Properties, LLC, an operating platform of BBX Capital. In conjunction with the acquisition, the Company hired six of Altman Logistic'sLogistics' employees. The following table details the projects purchased and the square feet (SF) of the warehouses:
Six Month Highlights
•Net loss attributable to the Company of ($0.9) million vs $2.3 million of net income primarily due to $2.3 million increase in G&A, $2.0 million lower interest income, and lower occupancy in our Multifamily and Industrial segments partially offset by strong Mining Royalty Lands performance
•4% decrease in pro rata NOI ($18.2 million vs $19.1 million) driven by lower occupancy in the Multifamily and Industrial and Commercial segments, partially offset by strong Mining Royalty Lands performance.
•10% decrease in the Multifamily segment’s pro rata NOI primarily due to lower occupancy, higher rent concessions and bad debts, and higher costs at our DC assets.
•20% decrease in Industrial and Commercial revenue and 36% decrease in that segment’s NOI primarily due to vacancies from an eviction of one tenant and lease expirations.
•14% increase in the Mining Royalty Lands' Segment's NOI driven by a 7.3% rise in royalty tons and a 5.9% increase in royalty revenue per ton.
Comparative Results of Operations for the Six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025
Consolidated Results
Net loss attributable to the Company for the first six months of 2026 was $946,000 or $(.05) per share versus income of $2,288,000 or $.12 per share in the same period last year. Pro rata NOI for the first six months of 2026 was $18,232,000 versus $19,052,000 in the same period last year. The first six months of 2026 were impacted by the following items:
•Operating profit decreased $2,011,000 or 51%. The consolidated portion of the Multifamily segment (Dock/Maren) decreased $631,000 due to lower occupancy, rent concessions, and higher operating costs. Industrial and commercial segment operating profit declined $908,000 with $298,000 due to $218,000 of depreciation and $80,000 of first quarter carrying costs on our Chelsea spec warehouse placed in service in April 2025 along with non-renewing leases. Mining Royalty Land's segment operating profit increased $771,000 due to higher royalty tons and revenues less related depletion. Development segment operating profit increased $1,067,000 due to joint venture management fee revenues ($358,000), and the prior year including Altman acquisition expenses ($713,000), partially offset by less capitalized real estate taxes ($130,000). General & administrative costs increased $2,310,000 due to $1,892,000 higher personnel costs (primarily Altman acquisition related), $346,000 higher audit fees, $173,000 of acquisition valuation and accounting consulting fees, $175,000 increased legal fees related to replacement of our equity incentive plan, the acquisition, and other one-time events, $253,000 higher acquisition-related IT and other professional fees, $115,000 higher marketing costs, partially offset by $602,000 increased labor capitalization.
•Net investment income decreased $1,984,000 from reduced earnings on our lower cash equivalents ($1,269,000) and reduced income from our lending ventures ($715,000) on smaller loan balances outstanding and fewer residential lots sold.
•Interest expense decreased $110,000 compared to the same period last year as we capitalized $276,000 more interest partially offset by the interest expense on our Wells Fargo Credit Agreement. More interest was capitalized due to increased in-house and joint venture projects under development this quarter compared to last year.
•Equity in loss of Joint Ventures was an unfavorable $624,000 due to higher losses at Bryant Street ($429,000) and Verge ($171,000) both due to lower revenues and higher expenses, along with losses at recently completed industrial properties ($159,000) partially offset by improved results at our other unconsolidated joint ventures.
FRPH insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 2 Form 4 filings (2 insiders, 3 trade dates, 15,946 shares, about $349.9K) and open-market sales in 0 filings. Net open-market shares: 15,946 (purchases minus sales); net value about $349.9K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-18 | Baker John D Ii |
Open-market purchase |
8,189 | $21.97 | $179.9K |
| 2026-08-17 | Baker John D Ii |
Open-market purchase |
957 | $21.97 | $21.0K |
| 2026-08-07 | Baker John D. Iii |
Open-market purchase |
6,800 | $21.91 | $149.0K |
| 2026-05-14 | Surface John S |
Grant/award | 4,671 | $21.41 | $100.0K |
| 2026-05-14 | Stein Martin E Jr |
Grant/award | 4,671 | $21.41 | $100.0K |
| 2026-05-14 | Mcafee Matthew |
Grant/award | 4,671 | $21.41 | $100.0K |
| 2026-05-14 | Wetherbee Margaret B. |
Grant/award | 4,671 | $21.41 | $100.0K |
| 2026-05-14 | Walton William H Iii |
Grant/award | 4,671 | $21.41 | $100.0K |
| 2026-05-14 | Thomas Nicole B. |
Grant/award | 4,671 | $21.41 | $100.0K |
Well-known investors holding FRPH (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 156,211 | $3.9M | 0.0% | Reduced 14% |
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 74,657 | $1.9M | 0.0% | Added 66% |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 52,000 | $1.3M | 0.0% | Reduced 42% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 38,737 | $968.0K | 0.0% | Reduced 28% |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 14,380 | $314.6K | — | Sold out |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 9,974 | $218.2K | — | Sold out |