FRST 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Primis Financial Corp. · Nasdaq · State Commercial Banks · CIK 1325670 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Our earnings are subject to interest rate risk.”
New heading “Industry adoption of real-time payments networks could negatively impact financial performance through reductions in product profitability, increased liquidity reserves and the potential for increased fraud losses, among other risks.”
New heading “Financial services companies depend on the accuracy and completeness of information about customers and counterparties and inaccuracies in such information, including as a result of fraud, could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.”
Removed heading “Our business is subject to interest rate risk and variations in interest rates may negatively affect our financial performance.”
Removed heading “A portion of our income on a portfolio of consumer loans with promotional features is due from a third-party that originated the loans on our behalf. The value of this estimated reimbursement is recorded in our balance sheet at fair value as a derivative and actual results and a significant decline in the third-party’s credit risk may impact the value of the derivative and our ability to realize that value which could affect our financial performance and results of operations.”
Removed heading “We may be unable to sell loans at the estimated market price utilized to record them in held for sale”
Removed heading “Our business is susceptible to fraud.”
Largest changes
We are operating in an uncertain economic environment. The global credit and financial markets have experienced extreme volatility and disruptions over the past few years, including severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, declines in consumer confidence, declines in economic growth, increases in unemployment rates, high rates of inflation, and uncertainty about economic stability and a potential recession. The U.S. government's decisions regarding appointments at the Federal Reserve, its debt ceiling and the possibility that the U.S. could default on its debt obligations may cause further interest rate adjustments, disrupt access to capital markets, and deepen recessionary conditions. Further, disagreements between the U.S. and significant trading partners over economic or political matters such as international trade may result in new or continued sanctions, tariffs and other similar restrictions on trade and investment between countries, which may result in supply chain disruptions and increased costs that could negatively affect us, our customers and our counterparties. In addition, conflicts between countries such as the Russian military action against Ukraine and ongoing conflicts in the Middle East, could lead to regional instability, a rise in commodity prices, increase inflationary pressures and market volatility, and thereby have an indirect effect on us even when we do not have material exposure to such countries. While our management team continually monitors market conditions and economic factors, throughout our footprint, we are unable to predict the duration or severity of such conditions or factors. If conditions were to worsen nationally, regionally, or locally, then we could see a sharp increase in our total net charge-offs and also be required to significantly increase our allowance for credit losses. Furthermore, the demand for loans and our other products and services could decline. An increase in our non-performing assets and related increases in our provision for loan losses, coupled with a potential decrease in the demand for loans and other products and services, could negatively affect our business and could have a material adverse effect on our capital, financial condition, results of operations, and future growth.see in full comparisonOur clients may also be adversely impacted by changes in regulatory, trade (including tariffs), and tax policies and laws, all of which could reduce demand for loans and adversely impact our borrowers' ability to repay our loans.
“Industry adoption of real-time payments networks could negatively impact financial performance through reductions in product profitability, increased liquidity reserves and the potential for increased fraud losses, among other risks.”see in full comparison
“Based on our analysis of the interest rate sensitivity of our assets, an increase in the general level of interest rates may negatively affect the market value of the portfolio equity as well as negatively affect our net interest income since a majority of our assets are fixed rate loans. Additionally, an increase in interest rates may, among other things, reduce the demand for loans and our ability to originate loans as well as increase our funding costs. …”see in full comparison
“Our business is subject to interest rate risk and variations in interest rates may negatively affect our financial performance.”see in full comparison
“The U.S. government announced changes to its trade policies in 2025 and significantly increased tariffs on certain imports under emergency authorities, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”). In February 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs. The current tariff environment remains dynamic and uncertain, including regarding potential refunds of tariffs paid under IEEPA, and the U.S. government could respond with replacement measures under other legal authorities. …”see in full comparison
“A portion of our income on a portfolio of consumer loans with promotional features is due from a third-party that originated the loans on our behalf. The value of this estimated reimbursement is recorded in our balance sheet at fair value as a derivative and actual results and a significant decline in the third-party’s credit risk may impact the value of the derivative and our ability to realize that value which could affect our financial performance and results of operations.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (67)
We are subject to risks related to our concentration of commercial real estate and construction and land development and commercial real estate loans.
As of December 31, 2024, we had $101.2 million of construction and land development loans, or 3.5% of our loan portfolio. Construction and land development loans are subject to risks during the construction phase that are not present in standard residential real estate and commercial real estate loans. These risks include:
Real estate construction and land development loans may involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment dependent, in part, on the success of the ultimate project rather than the ability of a borrower or guarantor to repay the loan and also present risks of default in the event of declines in property values or volatility in the real estate market during the construction phase. Our practice, in the majority of instances, is to secure the personal guaranty of individuals in support of our real estate construction and land development loans which provides us with an additional source of repayment. As of December 31, 2024, we did not have any nonperforming construction and land development loans. If one or more of our larger borrowers were to default on their construction and land development loans, and we did not have alternative sources of repayment through personal guarantees or other sources, or if any of the aforementioned risks were to occur, we could incur significant losses.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had $1.09$1.2 billion of commercial real estate loans outstanding, or 37.6%37% of our loan portfolio, including multi-family residential loans and loans secured by farmland. Commercial real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amountsamounts, and the repayment is dependent, in large part, on sufficient income from the properties securing the loan to cover operating expenses and debt service. As of December 31, 2025, we had $42 million in nonperforming commercial real estate loans.
As of December 31, 2025, we had $132 million of construction and land development loans outstanding, or 4% of our loan portfolio. Construction and land development loans are subject to risks during the construction phase that are not present in standard residential real estate and commercial real estate loans. These risks include:
Real estate construction and land development loans may involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment dependent, in part, on the success of the ultimate project rather than the ability of a borrower or guarantor to repay the loan and also present risks of default in the event of declines in property values or volatility in the real estate market during the construction phase. Our practice, in the majority of instances, is to secure the personal guaranty of individuals in support of our real estate construction and land development loans which provides us with an additional source of repayment. As of December 31, 2025, we did not have any nonperforming construction and land development loans. However, if one or more of our larger borrowers were to default on their construction and land development loans and we did not have alternative sources of repayment through personal guarantees or other sources, or if any of the aforementioned risks were to occur, we could incur significant losses.
We have a meaningful amount of consumer loans that are unsecured and if the borrower defaults on the loanloan, we have no recourse to collateral in which to recover any potential losses.
Our unsecured consumer loan portfolio balance is $155.3$183 million, or approximately 5.3%6% of our total held for investment loan portfolio, as of December 31, 2024.2025. Included in this portfolio is $38.9$90 million of loans sourced based on our credit underwriting criteria and managed by a third party. Consumer loan repayment is primarily driven by the borrower’s personal incomeincome, which is impacted by various factors that are outside of the control of the borrowerborrower, including macroeconomic conditions such as inflation and fluctuating interest rates. Further, aA downturn in the economy or otherjob company-specificlosses decisionscould that result inimpact a borrower losing their job could cause the borrower’s primaryability sourceto of income for repayment of themake loan to decline.payments. Each of these factors maycould cause a borrower to evaluate their debts and as a result they may prioritize paymentpayments of other debts above the consumer loanloans due to us. AlthoughIf macroeconomic conditions and the economy are currently stable, such conditions can change relatively quick and may not remain at current levels. If conditions change and macroeconomic conditions and the economy worsenworsen, borrowers may stop paying their loansloans, and itwhich could in turn require us to increase our provision for credit losses and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
A portion of our consumer loan portfolio is originated and serviced by a third-party and includes a credit enhancement from that third-partyenhancement, which may not be realizable and; the inability to utilize itsuch credit enhancement could be detrimental to our financial condition and results of operations.
We receive a credit enhancement from thea third-party managing $152.1$90 million of consumer loans that are recorded on our balance sheet in both held for investment and held for sale as of December 31, 2024.2025. The credit enhancement is primarily provided through cash flows derived from loan originations. We madeelected the decision as ofon December 31, 2024 to discontinue originations of these loansloans, oneffective January 31, 2025. ThisAs decisiona willresult, causeour monthly cash receipts related to this credit enhancement to end at that point,ceased, which maycould adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.operations while loan balances in this portfolio run-off.
A significant amount of our third-party serviced consumer loans were originated withduring a zero interestzero-interest promotional periodperiod, exposing us to thethird-party credit risk of the third-party that is providing reimbursement to us for interest foregone in the event of borrower prepayment; andthe failure of thesuch third-party to perform under its reimbursement obligation could be detrimental to our financial condition and results of operations.
Within theour $152.1$90 million third-party originated and serviced consumer loan portfolioportfolio, there is 25%$3 million of the portfolio that is in a promotional zero interest rate period as of December 31, 2024.2025. The loans in these promotional interest periods legally accrue interest at the stated rate of the note agreement, but the interest is not required to be paid during the promotional period. Further, if the borrower repays all of the principal on the note prior to the end of the promotional period the accrued interest is waived, but if there is any principal balance remaining at the end of the promotional period the borrower must repay all of the interest that has accrued. As of December 31, 2024,2025, the amount of deferred interest on these loans was $7.0$390 million.thousand. Through an agreement with the third-party servicer, we are entitled to payment of all accrued interest that is waived on loans that repay all principal within the promotional period. There is a large concentration of these loans originated within proximity to each other resulting in 86% of the current balance of promotional loans ending their promotional period during 2025. If a high percentage of these loans repay at or before the end of their promotional periodperiod, a large amount of interest reimbursement will be due infrom athe shortthird-party periodservicer. of time fromIf the third-party servicer and if they cannot performreimburse thenus, we may not be able to realize any income on a significant amount ofthese loans in our portfolio, which may adversely impact the realization of the fair value of the derivative asset recognized.portfolio.
As of December 31, 2025, we had $10 million aggregate receivable on our balance sheet due from the third-party related to prior reimbursements of interest on promotional loans where borrowers paid in full prior to the end of the promotional period. Of this amount, $8 million is included in a commercial loan extended to the third-party under our normal loan origination and credit underwriting process to allow the third-party a deferred payment schedule to support their operational and cash flow needs. Should the third party be unable to make the scheduled payments under this commercial loan once they become due or be unable to pay the $2 million trade receivable due, it may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Real estate lending (including commercial, construction, land development, and residential loans) is a large portion of our loan portfolio, constituting $2.0 billion, or approximately 69.3%61% of our total loan portfolio, as of December 31, 2024.2025. Although residential and commercial real estate values are currently strong in our market area, such values may not remain elevated. If loans that are collateralized by real estate become troubled during a time when market conditions are declining or have declined, then we may not be able to realize the full value of the collateral that we anticipated at the time of originatingloan the loan,origination, which could require us to increase our provision for credit losses and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, our nonperforming assets (which consist of nonaccrual loans, loans past due 90 days and accruing and OREO) totaled $16.7$87 million, or 0.58%3% of total loans and OREO, which is an increase of $5.9$70 million, or 54.9%,417%, compared with nonperforming assets of $10.8$17 million, or 0.34%1% of total non-covered loans and OREOOREO, as of December 31, 2023.2024.
Economic and market conditions have been unstable,unstable recently, and although we believe that our nonperforming assets as a percentage of total loans and OREO remains manageable, we may incur losses if there is an increase in nonperforming assets in the future. Our nonperforming assets adversely affect our net income in various ways. We do not record interest income on nonaccrual loans or OREO, thereby adversely affecting our net interest income, and increasing loan administration costs. When we take collateral in foreclosures and similar proceedings, we are required to mark the related loan to the then fair value of the collateral, which may ultimately result in a loss. We must reserve for expected losses, which is established through a current period charge to the provision for credit losses as well as from time to time, as appropriate, a write down of the value of properties in our OREO portfolio to reflect changing market values. Additionally, there are legal fees associated with the resolution of problem assets as well as carrying costs such as taxes, insurance and maintenance related to our OREO. Further, the resolution of nonperforming assets requires the active involvement of management, which can distract them from more profitable activity. Finally, an increase in the level of nonperforming assets increases our regulatory risk profile. There can be no assurance that we will not experience future increases in nonperforming assets.assets, which could negatively impact our earnings.
In addition, federal regulators periodically review our allowance for credit losses and may require us to increase our provision for credit losses or recognize further charge-offs, based on judgments different thanfrom those of our management. Any significant increase in our allowance for credit losses or charge-offs required by these regulatory agencies would result in a decrease in net income and capital and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
The Bank originates residential mortgage loans through Primis Mortgage CompanyPMC, which lends to borrowers nationwide. The success of our mortgage business is dependent upon its ability to originate loans and sell them to investors, in each case at or near current volumes. Loan production levels are sensitive to changes in the level of interest rates and changes in economic conditions. Loan production levels may suffer if we experience a slowdown in housing markets, tightening credit conditions or increasing interest rates. Any sustained period of decreased activity caused by fewer refinancing transactions, higher interest rates, housing price pressure, or loan underwriting restrictions would adversely affect our mortgage originations and, consequently, could significantly reduce our income from mortgage activities. As a result, these conditions would also adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Our earnings are subject to interest rate risk.
Our earnings and cash flows are largely dependent upon our net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income earned on interest earning assets such as loans and securities and interest expense paid on interest bearing liabilities such as deposits and borrowed funds. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control, including the rate of inflation, general economic conditions and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies (in particular, the Federal Reserve). From July 2023 through August of 2024, the federal funds rate remained steady at 5.25% to 5.50%. In each of the third and fourth quarters of 2024, the Federal Reserve reduced the target federal funds rate by 50 basis points to 4.25% to 4.50%. In the third quarter of 2025, the Federal Reserve reduced the target federal funds rate by 25 basis points to 4.00% to 4.25%. In the fourth quarter of 2025, the Federal Reserve reduced the target federal funds rate by 50 basis points to 3.50% to 3.75%. Uncertainty regarding future rates could negatively impact our cost of borrowing and reduce the amount of money our customers borrow or adversely affect their ability to repay outstanding loan balances that may increase due to adjustments in their variable rates.
Changes in monetary policy, interest rates, the yield curve, or market risk spreads, or a prolonged, flat or inverted yield curve could influence not only the interest we receive on loans and securities and the amount of interest we pay on deposits and borrowings, but such changes could also affect:
If the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings increase at a faster rate than the interest rates received on loans and other investments, our net interest income, and therefore earnings, could be adversely affected. Earnings could also be adversely affected if the interest rates received on loans and other investments fall more quickly than the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings.
Any substantial, unexpected or prolonged change in market interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our business is subject to interest rate risk and variations in interest rates may negatively affect our financial performance.
The majority of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature and subject us to significant risk from changes in interest rates. These rates are highly sensitive to many factors beyond our control, including general economic conditions and the policies of the Federal Reserve and other governmental and regulatory agencies. Like most financial institutions, changes in interest rates can impact our net interest income as well as the valuation of our assets and liabilities, which is the difference between interest earned from interest-earning assets, such as loans and investment securities, and interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. We expect that we will periodically experience “gaps” in the interest rate sensitivities of our assets and liabilities, meaning that either our interest-bearing liabilities will be more sensitive to changes in market interest rates than our interest-earning assets, or vice versa. In either event, if market interest rates should move contrary to our position, this “gap” will negatively impact our earnings.
Based on our analysis of the interest rate sensitivity of our assets, an increase in the general level of interest rates may negatively affect the market value of the portfolio equity as well as negatively affect our net interest income since a majority of our assets are fixed rate loans. Additionally, an increase in interest rates may, among other things, reduce the demand for loans and our ability to originate loans as well as increase our funding costs. A decrease in the general level of interest rates may affect us through, among other things, increased prepayments on our loan and mortgage-backed securities portfolios, but also allow us to reduce funding costs. Accordingly, changes in the level of market interest rates affect our net yield on interest-earning assets, loan origination volume, loan and mortgage-backed securities portfolios, funding, and our overall results. While it is expected that the FRB will hold the target federal funds rate steady in the first half of 2025, we are unable to predict changes in interest rates, which are affected by factors beyond our control, including inflation, deflation, recession, unemployment, money supply, and other changes in financial markets.
Although our asset liability management strategy is designed to keep our risk within acceptable parameters, it may not be able to prevent changes in interest rates from having a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
We are operating in an uncertain economic environment. The global credit and financial markets have experienced extreme volatility and disruptions over the past few years, including severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, declines in consumer confidence, declines in economic growth, increases in unemployment rates, high rates of inflation, and uncertainty about economic stability and a potential recession. The U.S. government's decisions regarding appointments at the Federal Reserve, its debt ceiling and the possibility that the U.S. could default on its debt obligations may cause further interest rate adjustments, disrupt access to capital markets, and deepen recessionary conditions. Further, disagreements between the U.S. and significant trading partners over economic or political matters such as international trade may result in new or continued sanctions, tariffs and other similar restrictions on trade and investment between countries, which may result in supply chain disruptions and increased costs that could negatively affect us, our customers and our counterparties. In addition, conflicts between countries such as the Russian military action against Ukraine and ongoing conflicts in the Middle East, could lead to regional instability, a rise in commodity prices, increase inflationary pressures and market volatility, and thereby have an indirect effect on us even when we do not have material exposure to such countries. While our management team continually monitors market conditions and economic factors, throughout our footprint, we are unable to predict the duration or severity of such conditions or factors. If conditions were to worsen nationally, regionally, or locally, then we could see a sharp increase in our total net charge-offs and also be required to significantly increase our allowance for credit losses. Furthermore, the demand for loans and our other products and services could decline. An increase in our non-performing assets and related increases in our provision for loan losses, coupled with a potential decrease in the demand for loans and other products and services, could negatively affect our business and could have a material adverse effect on our capital, financial condition, results of operations, and future growth. Our clients may also be adversely impacted by changes in regulatory, trade (including tariffs), and tax policies and laws, all of which could reduce demand for loans and adversely impact our borrowers' ability to repay our loans.
The U.S. government announced changes to its trade policies in 2025 and significantly increased tariffs on certain imports under emergency authorities, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”). In February 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs. The current tariff environment remains dynamic and uncertain, including regarding potential refunds of tariffs paid under IEEPA, and the U.S. government could respond with replacement measures under other legal authorities. Replacement measures and changes to tariffs and other trade restrictions may lead to continuing uncertainty and volatility in the U.S. and global financial markets and economic conditions which could cause adverse changes in the availability, terms and cost of capital. Additionally, potential tariffs or other U.S. trade policy measures have triggered and may trigger additional retaliatory actions by other countries such as China. Increased tariffs and trade restrictions may cause the prices of our customers’ products to increase, which could reduce demand for such products, or reduce our customers’ margins, and adversely impact their revenues, financial results, and ability to service debt, which in turn, could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our clients may also be adversely impacted by changes in regulatory and tax policies and laws, all of which could reduce demand for loans and adversely impact our borrowers' ability to repay our loans.
We maintain an investment securities portfolio that includes, but is not limited to, collateralized mortgage obligations, agency mortgage-backed securities and municipal securities. The market value of investment securities may be affected by factors other than the underlying performance of the issuer or composition of the bonds themselves, such as ratings downgrades, adverse changes in the business climate and a lack of liquidity for resales of certain investment securities. At each reporting period, we evaluate investment securities and other assets for impairment indicators. We may be required to record impairment charges in our income statements through an allowance for credit losses if our investment securities suffer a decline in value below their amortized cost. DuringIn the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, we incurred an insignificant amount of impairment charges related to credit losses on our investment securities and in 20242025, we did not experience any impairment of our investment securities. If in future periods we determine that a significant impairment has occurred, we would be required to charge against earnings the credit-related portion of the impairment, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations in the periods in which the impairments occur.
A portion of our income on a portfolio of consumer loans with promotional features is due from a third-party that originated the loans on our behalf. The value of this estimated reimbursement is recorded in our balance sheet at fair value as a derivative and actual results and a significant decline in the third-party’s credit risk may impact the value of the derivative and our ability to realize that value which could affect our financial performance and results of operations.
We record a derivative asset as of December 31, 2024, which mostly reflects our estimate of the fair value of the interest reimbursement due to us from the third-party loan servicer that manages an unsecured consumer loan portfolio with promotional features for us. This derivative asset reflects the interest anticipated to be waived to borrowers under the assumed pre-payment of the borrowers’ loans that the third party will be required to pay to us. The derivative is required to be valued at fair value under U.S. GAAP with the use of various assumptions including borrower pre-payment, expected credit losses, and the third-party servicer’s credit risk. Assumptions used to determine the value of the derivative are sensitive to various factors not within our control that include borrower repayment risk and the credit risk of the third-party servicer. These assumptions are determined based on the information available to the Company as of each balance sheet date. Actual results that differ significantly from our prior assumptions may result in an inability to realize the value of the derivative and require updates to future fair value calculations of the derivative which could result in a significant increase or decrease in the derivative value that is recorded in our results of operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations in future periods.
We may be unable to sell loans at the estimated market price utilized to record them in held for sale
We have $113.2 million of Consumer Program loans in held for sale at the lower of cost or market as of December 31, 2024 that were recorded at their estimated fair value. At the time we transferred the loans to held for sale we recorded a $20 million write-down of the loans through the allowance for credit losses to reflect their estimated fair value that resulted in an equal amount of additional provision expense recorded in our income statement. The fair value of these loans are required to be re-evaluated at each reporting period until they are sold and any subsequent change in estimated fair value recorded as an additional adjustment to their value in the balance sheet with an equal charge to the income statement. Further, market conditions impacting the value of these loans could change and result in us selling the loans at a market price that is less than the value recorded on our balance sheet as of December 31, 2024, which would result in additional losses recorded in income at the time of sale.
Furthermore, as a result of our diverse base of clients and business partners, we may face potential negative publicity based on the identity of our clients or business partners and the public’s (or certain segments of the public’s) view of those entities. Such publicity may arise from traditional media sources or from social media and may increase rapidly in size and scope. If our client or business partner relationships were to become intertwined in such negative publicity, our ability to attract and retain clients, business partners, and employees may be negatively impacted, and our stock price may also be negatively impacted. Additionally, we may face pressure not to not do business in certain industries that are viewed as harmful to the environment or are otherwise negatively perceived, which could impact our growth.
We intend to continue pursuing a growth strategy for our business. Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by growing companies such as the continuing need for infrastructure and personnel, the time and costs inherent in integrating a series of different operations and the ongoing expense of acquiring and staffing new bankslines of business or branches. We may not be able to expand our presence in our existing markets or successfully enter new marketsmarkets, and any expansion could adversely affect our results of operations. Failure to manage our growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, future prospects, financial condition or results of operations, and could adversely affect our ability to successfully implement our business strategy. Our ability to grow successfully will depend on a variety of factors, including the continued availability of desirable business opportunities, the competitive responses from other financial institutions in our market areasareas, and our ability to manage our growth.
Although there can be no assurance of success or the availability of branch or financial services acquisitions in the future, we may seek to supplement our internal growth through attractive acquisitions. We cannot predict the number, size or timing of acquisitions, or whether any such acquisition will occur at all. Our acquisition efforts have traditionally focused on targeted entities in markets in which we currently operate and markets in which we believe we can compete effectively. However, as consolidation of the financial services industry continues, the competition for suitable acquisition candidates may increase and, as the number of appropriate targets decreases, the prices for potential acquisitions could increaseincrease, which could reduce our potential returns,returns and reduce the attractiveness of these opportunities to us. We may compete with other financial services companies for acquisition opportunities, andthat many of these competitorsmay have greater financial resources than we do and may be able to pay more for an acquisition than we are able or willing to pay.
The financial services industry is continually undergoing rapid technological change with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services including those related to or involving artificial intelligence, machine learnings, blockchain and other distributed ledger technologies. The effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to better serve customers and reduce costs. Our future success depends, in part, upon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands, as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations. Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. We may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to our customers, and even if we implement such products and services, we may incur substantial costs in doing so. Failure to successfully keep pace with technological changes affecting the financial services industry could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If competitors introduce new products and services embodying new technologies, or if new industry standards and practices emerge, our existing product and service offerings, technology and systems may become obsolete. Further, if we fail to adopt or develop new technologies or to adapt our products and services to emerging industry standards, we may lose current and future customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The financial services industry is changing rapidly and in order to remain competitive, we must continue to enhance and improve the functionality and features of our products, services and technologies. These changes may be more difficult or expensive than we anticipate.
From time to time, we implement new lines of business or offer new products and services within existing lines of business. There are substantial risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts, particularly in instances where the markets are not fully developed. In developing and marketing new lines of business and/or new products and services we invest significant time and resources. Initial timetables for the introduction and development of new lines of business and/or new products or services may not be achievedachieved, and price and profitability targets may not prove feasible. External factors, such as compliance with regulations, competitive alternatives, and shifting market preferences,preferences may also impact the successful implementation of a new line of business or a new product or service.
The financial services industry is continually undergoing rapid technological change with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services (including those related to or involving artificial intelligence, machine learning, blockchain and other distributed ledger technologies), and an established and growing demand for mobile and other phone and computer banking applications. Our future success depends, in part, uponon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands, as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations. Many of our competitors may have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. We may not be able to effectively implement new technology driventechnology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to our customers. In addition, our implementation of certain new technologies, such as those related to artificial intelligence, automation and algorithms, in our business processes may have unintended consequences due to their limitations or our failure to use them effectively. In addition, cloud technologies are also critical to the operation of our systems, and our reliance on cloud technologies is growing. Failure to successfully keep pace with technological change affecting the financial services industry could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Furthermore, any new line of business, new productproducts or service and/or new technology could have a significant impact on the effectiveness of our system of internal controls. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business, new products or services and/or new technologies could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The CompanyWe or itsour third-party (or fourth party) vendors, clients or counterparties may develop or incorporate AI technology in certain business processes, services, or products. The development and use of AI presentspresent a number of risks and challenges to the Company’sour business. The legal and regulatory environment relating to AI is uncertain and rapidly evolving, both in the U.S. and internationally, and includes regulatory schemes targeted specifically at AI as well as provisions in intellectual property, privacy, consumer protection, employment, and other laws applicable to the use of AI. These evolving laws and regulations could require changes in the Company’sour implementation of AI technology and increase the Company’sour compliance costs and the risk of non-compliance. AI models, particularly generative AI models, may produce output or take action that is incorrect, that reflects biases included in the data on which they are trained, that results in the release of private, confidential, or proprietary information, that infringes on the intellectual property rights of others, or that is otherwise harmful. In addition, the complexity of many AI models makes it difficult to understand why they are generating particular outputs. This limited transparency increases the challenges associated with assessing the proper operation of AI models, understanding and monitoring the capabilities of the AI models, reducing erroneous output, eliminating bias, and complying with regulations that require documentation or explanation of the basis on which decisions are made. Further, the Companywe may rely on AI models developed by third parties, and, to that extent, would be dependent in part on the manner in which those third parties develop and train their models, including risks arising from the inclusion of any unauthorized material in the training data for their models and the effectiveness of the steps these third parties have taken to limit the risks associated with the output of their models, matters over which the Companywe may have limited visibility. Any of these risks could expose the Companyus to liability or adverse legal or regulatory consequences and harm the Company’sour reputation and the public perception of itsour business or the effectiveness of itsour security measures.
Further, we acquire businesses with the expectation that these mergers or acquisitions will result in various benefits including, among other things, benefits relating to enhanced revenues, a strengthened market position for the combined company, cross sellingcross-selling opportunities, technology, cost savings and operating efficiencies. Achieving the anticipated benefits of these mergers and acquisitions is subject to a number of uncertainties, including whether we integrate these institutions in an efficient and effective manner, and general competitive factors in the marketplace. Failure to achieve these anticipated benefits could result in a reduction in the price of our shares as well as in increased costs, decreases in the amount of expected revenues and diversion of management's time and energy and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
When we complete an acquisition, goodwill and other intangible assets are often recorded on the date of acquisition as an asset. Current accounting guidance requires goodwill to be tested for impairment, and we perform such impairment analysis at least annually. A significant adverse change in expected future cash flows or sustained adverse change in the value of our common stock could require the asset to become impaired. If impaired, we would incur a charge to earnings that would have a significant impact on the results of operations. Our carrying value of goodwill and net amortizable intangibles were approximately $93.5$93 million and $0.7$36 million,thousand, respectively, as of December 31, 2024.2025.
We rely on third-party vendors to provide key components of our business infrastructure.infrastructure, which could expose us to operational and financial risks.
Industry adoption of real-time payments networks could negatively impact financial performance through reductions in product profitability, increased liquidity reserves and the potential for increased fraud losses, among other risks.
With the launch of real-time payments networks, such as RTP® from The Clearing House and FedNow® from the Federal Reserve, instantaneous cash settlement capabilities are available 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. The implications of the new settlement capabilities are far reaching and have not yet significantly affected the banking industry. As market adoption increases, we may be required to hold more liquidity reserves in cash to facilitate cash settlement activity outside of traditional business hours. Additionally, instantaneous settlement will likely reduce float benefits associated with providing deposit and banking services, as well as pose incremental fraud risk due to a reduced ability to reverse fraudulent transactions due to the speed of money movement.
We face significant cyber and data security risk that could result in the disclosure of or access to sensitive, confidential and/or nonpublic personal information, adversely affect our business or reputation and expose us to significant liabilities.
As a financial institution, we are under threat of loss due to cyber-attacks and technical disruptions to the computer systems and network infrastructure we use, including those we maintain with our service providers and vendors. This risk has increased in recent years, and continues to increase, as we continue to expand customer capabilities to utilize internet and other remote channels to transact business. Two of the most significant cyber-attack risks that we face are e-fraud and compromise of sensitive customer data. E-fraud occurs when cybercriminals compromise our systems and networks, or those of our service providers and vendors, and extract funds directly from customercustomers or our accounts. The attempts to compromise sensitivesensitive, non-public personal customer data, such as account numbers and Social Security numbers, present potentially significant reputational, legal and/or regulatory costs to us. Our risk and exposure to these matters remainsremain heightened because of the evolving nature and complexity of these threats from cybercriminals, our plans to continue to provide internet banking and mobile banking channels,channels to initiate financial transactions, and our plans to develop additional remote connectivity solutions to serve our customers. While we have not experienced any material losses relating to cyber-attacks or other information security incidents, we have been subject to cyber-attacks and there can be no assurance that we will not suffer additional losses in the future.
We allow a portion of our employees to work remotely from their homes on a full-time or hybrid schedule. Technology in employees’ homes may not be as robust as in our offices and could cause the security of the networks, information systems, applications, and other tools available to employees to be more limited or less reliable than in our offices. The continuation of these work-from-home measures also introduces additional operational risk, including increased cybersecurity risks. These cybersecurity risks, and all those described above, include the potential for increased risk of (i) phishing, malware, and other cybersecurity attacks, (ii) vulnerability to disruptions of our information technology infrastructure and telecommunications systems for remote operations, (iii) unauthorized dissemination, access, misuse or destruction of sensitive or confidential information, (iv) our abilityinability to restore the systems in the event of a systems failure or interruption, and (v) impairment of our ability to perform critical functions, including wiring funds, all of which could expose us to risks of data or financial loss, litigation and liability and could seriously disrupt our operations and the operations of any impacted customers.
The occurrence of any successful cyber-attack could result in material adverse consequences to us including damage to our reputation, financial loss, increased operation expenses, remediation costs, and the loss of customers. We also could face litigation or additional regulatory scrutiny. Litigation or regulatory actions in turn could lead to significant liability or other sanctions, including fines and penalties (which may not be covered by our insurance policies) or reimbursement of customers adversely affected by a security incident. Even if we do not suffer any material adverse consequences as a result of other future events, successful attacks or systems failures at the Bank or at other financial institutions could lead to a general loss of customer confidence in financial institutionsinstitutions, including the Bank.
Our ability to mitigate the adverse consequences of occurrences is in part dependent on the qualityeffectiveness of our information security proceduresprocedures, controls, and contracts and our ability to anticipate the timing and nature of any such event that occurs. In recent years, we have incurred significant expense towards improving the reliability of our systems and their security from attack.attacks. Nonetheless, there remains the risk that we may be materially harmed by cyber-attacks and information security incidents in the future. Methods used to attack information systems change frequently (with generally increasing sophistication), often are not recognized until launched against a target, may be supported by foreign governments, criminal organizations, or other well-financedfinancially entities,motivated threat actors, and may originate from less regulated and remote areas around the world. As a result, we may be unable to prevent these methods in advance of attacks, including by implementing adequate preventive measures. If such an attack does occur, we might not be able to fix it timely or adequately. We seek to engage in due diligence and monitoring of third parties, including service providers and vendors, to limit the risk that such an attack relates to products or services provided by others, including third party service providers and vendors..others. In addition, as the regulatory environment related to information security, data collection and use, and privacy becomes increasingly rigorous, with new and constantly changing requirements applicable to our business, compliance with those requirements could also result in additional costs.
Financial services companies depend on the accuracy and completeness of information about customers and counterparties and inaccuracies in such information, including as a result of fraud, could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business is susceptible to fraud.
OurIn businessdeciding exposes uswhether to fraudextend riskcredit fromor loanenter andinto depositother customers,transactions thewith partiesthird parties, we do business with, as well as from employees, contractors and vendors. We rely on financialinformation furnished by or on behalf of customers and othercounterparties, data from new and existing customers which could turn out to be fraudulent when accepting such customers, executing theirincluding financial transactionsstatements, andcredit making and purchasing loansreports and other financial assets.information. We may also rely on representations of those customers, counterparties or other third parties, such as independent auditors or property appraisers, as to the accuracy and completeness of that information. Such information could be inaccurate, including as a result of fraud on behalf of our customers, counterparties or other third parties. In times of increased economic stressstress, we are at an increased risk of fraud losses. We believecannot assure you that our underwriting and operational controls are in place towill prevent or detect such fraud, but we cannot provide assurance that these controls will be effective in detecting fraud or that we will not experience fraud losses or incur costs or other damage related to such fraud, at levels that adversely affect financial results or reputation.fraud. Our lending customers may also experience fraud in their businessesbusinesses, which could adversely affect their ability to repay their loans or make use of our services. Our customers’exposure and the exposure of our exposurecustomers to fraud may increase our financial risk and reputation risk as it may result in unexpected loan losses that exceed those that have been provided for in theour allowance for creditloan losses. Reliance on inaccurate or misleading information from our customers, counterparties and other third parties, including as a result of fraud, could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our compensation practices are subject to review and oversight by the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and other regulators. The federal banking agencies have issued and oversee compliance with joint guidance on executive compensation designed to help ensure that a banking organization’s incentive compensation policies do not encourage imprudent risk taking and are consistent with the safety and soundness of the organization. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act required thosethese federal banking agencies, along with the SEC, to adopt rules to require reporting of incentive compensation and to prohibit certain compensation arrangements. In October 2022, the SEC adopted final rules requiring national securities exchanges, including Nasdaq where we are currently listed, to establish new listing standards relating to policies for the recovery of erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation, which are often referred to as “clawback policies.” The final rules directed U.S. stock exchanges to require listed companies to implement, disclose and enforce clawback policies to recover excess incentive-based compensation that current or former executive officers received based on financial reporting measures that are later restated. In June 2023, the SEC approved the Nasdaq’sNASDAQ’s proposed clawback listing standards, which now require us and other Nasdaq-listedNASDAQ-listed companies to (i) adopt and implement a compliant clawback policy; (ii) file the clawback policy as an exhibit to our annual reports; and (iii) provide certain disclosures relating to any compensation recovery triggered by the clawback policy. If, as a result of complying with these rules, we are unable to attract and retain qualified employees,employees or do so at rates necessary to maintain our competitive position, or if the compensation costs required to attract and retain employees become more significant, our performance, including our competitive position, could be materially adversely affected.
Deposit insurance premiums levied against banksus maycould increase if the number of bank failures increase or the cost of resolving failed banks increases.increase.
The FDIC maintains a Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) to protect insured depositors in the event of bank failures. The DIF is funded by fees assessed on insured depository institutions insured byincluding the FDIC.Bank. Future deposit premiums paid by banks willus depend on FDIC rules, which are subject to change, the level of the DIF and the magnitude and cost of future bank failures. WeThe FDIC may befurther requiredincrease the assessment rates or impose additional special assessments in the future, which may require the Bank to pay significantly higher FDIC premiums if market developments change such that the DIF balance is reduced or the FDIC changes its rules to require higher premiums.
Actual events involving limited liquidity, defaults, non-performance or other adverse developments that affect financial institutions, transactional counterparties or other companies in the financial services industry or the financial services industry generally, or concerns or rumors about any events of these kinds or other similar risks, have in the past and may in the future lead to market-wide liquidity problems. If any parties with whom we conduct business are unable to access deposits with another financial institution, funds pursuant to such instruments or lending arrangements with such a financial institution, such parties’ credit quality, ability to pay their obligations to us, or to enter into new commercial arrangements requiring additional payments to us could be adversely affected. Uncertainty remains over liquidity concerns in the broader financial services industry. Additionally, confidence in the safety and soundness of regional banks specifically or the banking system generally could impact where customers choose to maintain deposits, which could materially adversely impact our liquidity, loan funding capacity, ability to raise funds, and results of operations. Similar impacts have occurred in the past, such as during the 2008-2010 financial crisis.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Executive Overview”
New heading “Core Community Bank”
New heading “Panacea Financial Division of the Bank”
New heading “Mortgage Warehouse”
New heading “SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL RESULTS”
New heading “Results of Operations Highlights”
New heading “Loans Held for Sale”
New heading “Loans Held for Investment”
New heading “Consumer Program Loans”
New heading “Nonperforming Assets”
Removed heading “Allowance for credit losses”
Removed heading “Income Statement”
Removed heading “Asset Quality; Past Due Loans and Nonperforming Assets”
Largest changes
“The increase in noninterest expenses was partially offset by $11.2 million of goodwill impairment recognized in the third quarter of 2023. We had fraud losses during the year ended December 31, 2023 primarily related to a substantial increase in deposit account fraud, which was also seen across the industry during that time. Our fraud losses in 2024 were primarily due to losses in the Consumer Program loan portfolio. Other notable declines in expenses were seen in occupancy expenses, Virginia franchise tax, and gain (loss) on bank premises and equipment and assets held for sale. …”see in full comparison
“Noninterest expenses were $125.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $122.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2023. The 2.5% increase in noninterest expenses was primarily attributable to higher salaries and benefits expense, professional fees, data processing costs, and other operating expenses in 2024, partially offset by the goodwill impairment and higher fraud losses recognized during the year ended December 31, 2023. …”see in full comparison
“Net loss attributable to common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $16.2 million, or $0.66 loss per basic and diluted share, compared to net loss of $7.8 million, or $0.32 loss per basic and diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2023. The results reflect an increase in net interest income of $5.5 million and noncontrolling interests of $6.2 million, offset by higher credit loss provisions of $18.1 million, a decline of $2.1 million in noninterest income and an increase in noninterest expense of $3.0 million. …”see in full comparison
We identify potential problem loans based on loan portfolio credit quality. We define our potential problem loans as internally rated as substandardsee in full comparisonloansor worse, less total nonperforming assets noted above. As of December 31,2024,2025, our potential problem loans totaled$54.9$60 million.As of December 31, 2024, our total substandard loans were $71.5 million, compared to $17.2 million as of December 31, 2023. Loans rated internally as special mention loans, which is one internal credit rating higher than substandard, totaled $30.3 million as of December 31, 2024 and $14.9 million as of December 31, 2023. Increase in substandard loans was driven primarily due to four relationships totaling $54.9 million and the increase in special mention loans was related to $20 million of downgrades in 2024.
“We have experienced a majority of our losses in the Consumer Program on promotional loans originated in the third quarter of 2022 through the first quarter of 2023. Our allowance methodology for the Consumer Program was updated during the year ended December 31, 2024 to consider promotional loan maturity, especially around these earlier vintages, and amount of first payment defaults with eventual charge-off, which was a key driver to the heightened overall charge-offs in 2024. …”see in full comparison
“We borrow funds on a short-term basis to support our liquidity needs and to temporarily satisfy our funding needs from increased loan demand and for other shorter-term purposes. We are a member of the FHLB and are authorized to obtain advances from the FHLB from time to time, as needed. The FHLB has a credit program for members with different maturities and interest rates, which may be fixed or variable. We are required to collateralize our borrowings from FHLB with purchases of FHLB stock and other collateral acceptable to the FHLB. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (136)
Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K generally discusses year-to-year comparisons between the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023.2024. Discussions of comparisons between 20232024 and 20222023 are not included in this Form10-KForm 10-K, but can be found in “Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20232024 as filed with the SEC on OctoberApril 15,29, 2024.2025.
Management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) is presented to aid the reader in understanding and evaluating the financial condition and results of operations of Primis.the Company. This discussion and analysis should be read with the consolidated financial statements, the footnotes thereto, and the other financial data included in this report.
Allowance for credit losses
The amount of each allowance account represents management's best estimate of current expected credit losses on these financial instruments considering available information, from internal and external sources, relevant to assessing exposure to credit loss over the contractual term of the instrument. We consider a number of external economic variables in developing the allowance including the Virginia Unemployment Rate, Virginia House Price Index (“HPI”), Virginia Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”), and, National Unemployment and National Gross Domestic Product for pools of loans with borrowers outside of our local operating footprint. In determining forecasted expected losses, we use Moody’s economic variable forecasts and apply probability weights to the related economic scenarios. We also use internal factors including loan balances, credit quality, contractual life of loans, and historical loss experience. While historical credit loss experience provides the basis for the estimation of expected credit losses, adjustments to historical loss information may be made for differences in current portfolio-specific risk characteristics, environmental conditions or other relevant factors. Management’s primary qualitative factors utilized in informing qualitative adjustments to the modeled allowance calculations are loan-to-value exceptions, borrower debt service coverage exceptions, and large concentrations. As of December 31, 2025, the qualitative adjustments applied by management increased our modeled allowance that was based on historical loss information, but did not represent a material amount of our total allowance.
We consider a number of external economic variables in developing the allowance including the Virginia Unemployment Rate, Virginia House Price Index, Virginia Gross Domestic Product and National Unemployment and National Gross Domestic Product for pools of loans with borrowers outside of our local operating footprint. One of the most significant and judgmental assumptions is the selection and application of expected economic forecasts. In determining forecasted expected losses, we use Moody’s economic variable forecasts and apply probability weights to the related economic scenarios. Due to the inherent uncertainty in the macroeconomic forecasts, we evaluate a baseline scenario, as well as a downside macroeconomic scenario to assess the most reasonable scenario based on review of the variable forecasts for each scenario, comparison to expectations, and sensitivity of variations in each scenario. The Moody’s forecast scenarios are reviewed by management quarterly and probability weightings are assigned based on management’s judgment. As of December 31, 2025, management concluded on a more neutral weighting of baseline versus downside scenario. While management uses its judgment, there is no certainty that future economic conditions will resemble the neutral weighting applied to our modeling and others could examine the same data and arrive at a different judgment around weighting of the economic scenario that when applied to the model could result in a smaller or larger allowance than the one we determined.
Fair value determinations require considerable judgment and are sensitive to changes in underlying assumptions and factors. As a result, there can be no assurance that the estimates and assumptions made for purposes of the goodwill impairment testing as of September 30, 20242025 will prove to be an accurate prediction of the future. Changes in assumptions, market data (for market-based assessments), or the discount rate (for income based assessments) could produce different results that lead to higher or lower fair value determinations compared to the results of our annual impairment testing performed as of September 30, 2024.2025. Further, because the use of inputs and assumptions are highly judgmental an analysis performed to assess the fair value of our reporting units by others may resultsresult in higher, lower, or the same fair value determination and goodwill impairment decision through the use of their judgment in application of similar inputs and assumptions as we used. As a result of our testing, we determined that the estimated fair value of both reporting units was higher than their respective carrying values,values. resultingAs inof September 30, 2025, the estimated fair value of the Primis Bank and Primis Mortgage reporting units was 118% and 117%, respectively, of the carrying value of the reporting units, and no goodwill impairment was required. The Company performed a qualitative assessment to identify any triggering events as of SeptemberDecember 30,31, 2024.2025 and determined there were not any triggering events that would indicate that it was not more likely than not that the fair value of either reporting unit was less than its carrying value.
Because of the decision made subsequent to September 30, 2024 to sell a majority of the Consumer Program loan portfolio, we performed a qualitative assessment as of December 31, 2024 to determine if this change to the business resulted in a change in the estimated fair value of the Primis Bank reporting unit. Based on our qualitative assessment, which included updating discounted cash flow analyses to consider the projected run-off of income from the Consumer Program, Primis determined that it was not more likely than not that the fair value of the Primis Bank reporting unit was less than its carrying value as of December 31, 2024.
In the second half of 2021, we partnered with a third-party (the “Third Party Originator/Servicer” or “TPOS”) to originate and service unsecured consumer loans through their proprietary point-of-sale technology (the “Consumer Program”). Loan options under the Consumer Program include traditional fully-amortizing loans and promotional loans with no interest, or “same-as-cash”, features if the loan is fully repaid in the promotional window. The loans are originated at par in the Bank’s name and have a term of 5 to 12 years with a much shorter effective life due to amortization and pay downs.
We had $152.1 million and $199.3 million of loans outstanding in the Consumer Program, or 5% and 6% of our total gross loan portfolio, as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. As of December 31, 2024, $113.2 million is included in loans held for sale at lower of cost or market as a result of our decision to pursue a sale of that portion of the portfolio. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, $38.9 million and $199.3 million are included in loans held for investment. As of December 31, 2024, 22% of the principal balance of loans were in a promotional period requiring no payment of interest on their loans with 86% of these promotional loan periods ending during 2025.
During 2024, the TPOS requested the ability to finance its requirement to reimburse us for interest when a promotional loan pays off prior to the end of the promotional period as a result of the large volume of loans expected to end their promotional period in the second half of 2024 and first half of 2025. We agreed to provide financing in the form of a collateral secured term loan (the “TPOS Loan”) that was underwritten in accordance with our customary lending and underwriting policies. The loan allows for a maximum borrowing capacity of $10 million, but any borrowing above $5 million requires the TPOS to provide documentation of additional capital infusion since the original loan underwriting and approval. The TPOS Loan requires quarterly interest payments that may be capitalized to the principal of the note and the principal is due at the note maturity date of September 30, 2030. As of December 31, 2024, the balance of the note is $2.7 million.
In the fourth quarter of 2024, wethe Company made the decision to cease originating new loans under the Consumer ProgramProgram, effective January 31, 2025 and moved a large portion of the portfolio, with an amortized cost of $133.2$133 million, to loans held for sale and marked them to the lower of cost or fair market value. The adjustment to fair market value resulted in additional provision expense and charge-offs of $20.0$20 million induring the fourthyear quarterended ofDecember 31, 2024. The remaining portion of the portfolio stillof approximately $39 million remained classified as held for investment of approximately $38.9 million as of December 31, 20242024. hasDuring anthe associatedfirst allowancequarter of 2025 the Company made the decision to retain until their maturity or payoff the loans previously transferred to held for creditsale. lossesThe loans were transferred back to held for investment at their then current amortized cost basis at the time of $16.3transfer, millionwhich andincluded isthe expectedprevious tofair runmarket offvalue substantiallyadjustment inas 2025.required by applicable accounting guidance.
We had $90 million and $152 million of loans outstanding in the Consumer Program, or 3% and 5% of our total gross loan portfolio, as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. As of December 31, 2025, all of the Consumer Program loans were in loans held for investment. As of December 31, 2024, $113 million was included in loans held for sale at lower of cost or market and $39 million in the consumer loans category in loans held for investment. Loans in the Consumer Program that are held for investment are included within the Consumer Loan category disclosures in in this 10-K. As of December 31, 2025, 3% of the loans, or $3 million, were in a promotional period, with 80% of these promotional loan periods ending through the second quarter of 2026.
As noted, we moved a large portion of the Consumer Portfolio to held for sale as of December 31, 2024, which included a $20 million adjustment to reflect it at the lower of cost or market. The charge was taken against our allowance for credit losses in accordance with applicable regulatory guidance. The basis for determining the market price of our portfolio of loans to be held for sale included third-party bid pricing on the portfolio as a result of a marketing effort in December 2024. We received a range of bid prices based on limited diligence having been performed as of December 31, 2024, by potential third-party buyers. Following the marketing and bid process, we entered into a non-binding agreement with one of the third-parties to agree to sell the portfolio at their bid price that was contingent on the party performing additional diligence. A sales contract with final terms and pricing if the party decides to purchase the loans would be prepared and executed after completion of diligence. We determined the fair value for the portfolio as of December 31, 2024 based on a combination of the purchase price indicated in the non-binding agreement and the other bids received in the marketing process. The non-binding price was not relied upon exclusively, although weighted more heavily in our analysis, because it was non-binding and the ultimate price the party is willing to pay could change after their diligence so we considered the other bids received in our analysis to form a more comprehensive determination of fair value on the portfolio.
OVERVIEW
Primis Financial Corp. (“Primis,” “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company”) is the bank holding company for Primis Bank (“Primis Bank” or the “Bank”), a Virginia state-chartered bank which commenced operations on April 14, 2005. Primis Bank provides a range of financial services to individuals and small and medium-sized businesses. As of December 31, 2024, Primis Bank had twenty-four full-service branches in Virginia and Maryland and also provides services to customers through certain online and mobile applications. Twenty-two full-service retail branches are in Virginia and two full-service retail branches are in Maryland. The Company is headquartered in McLean, Virginia and has an administrative office in Glen Allen, Virginia and an operations center in Atlee, Virginia. Primis Mortgage Company, a residential mortgage lender headquartered in Wilmington, North Carolina, is a consolidated subsidiary of Primis Bank. PFH is a consolidated subsidiary of Primis and owns the rights to the Panacea Financial brand and its intellectual property and partners with the Bank to offer a suite of financial products and services for doctors, their practices, and ultimately the broader healthcare industry.
While Primis Bank offers a wide range of commercial banking services, it focuses on making loans secured primarily by commercial real estate and other types of secured and unsecured commercial loans to small and medium-sized businesses in a number of industries, as well as loans to individuals for a variety of purposes. Primis Bank invests in real estate-related securities, including collateralized mortgage obligations and agency mortgage backed securities. Primis Bank’s principal sources of funds for loans and investing in securities are deposits and, to a lesser extent, borrowings. Primis Bank offers a broad range of deposit products, including checking (NOW), savings, money market accounts and certificates of deposit. Primis Bank actively pursues business relationships by utilizing the business contacts of its senior management, other bank officers and its directors, thereby capitalizing on its knowledge of its local market areas.
FINANCIALOPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS
Executive Overview
We organized the core bank and lines of business in a way that we believe will drive premium operating results. Our strategy centers on growing earning assets back to previous levels after the sale of our Life Premium Finance division in January 2025, growing non-interest deposits, and achieving higher production and profitability in our retail mortgage business. We continued to execute successfully during 2025 on our strategies, which included the following key highlights:
Core Community Bank
Panacea Financial Division of the Bank
Mortgage Warehouse
Changes in the relationship with PFH during the first quarter of 2025 resulted in a determination to de-consolidate PFH as of March 31, 2025. The deconsolidation resulted in recognition of a $25 million gain during the year ended December 31, 2025, as a result of recording the fair value of our retained interest in common stock of PFH. As a result of the de-consolidation. we no longer include PFH’s financial results in our financial results after March 31, 2025. In June 2025, we sold a portion of our retained ownership in PFH common shares generating proceeds of $22 million and an additional gain during the year ended December 31, 2025 of $7 million. As of December 31, 2025, we continued to hold approximately 467 thousand shares in PFH recorded in our balance sheet at a fair value of $7 million. PFH continues to work with the Panacea Financial Division of the Bank to originate loans, some of which the Bank will retain, and others which will be sold to investors and other financial institutions.
SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL RESULTS
Results of Operations Highlights
We experienced significant improvement in financial performance during the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. Net income available to common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2025 totaled $61 million, or $2.49 basic and diluted earnings per share, compared to a net loss of $16 million, or $0.66 loss per basic and per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2024, resulting in an increase year-over-year of $78 million, or 481%. The key financial drivers of the improvement are noted in the following table with additional discussions following the table ($ in thousands).
Income Statement
Balance Sheet Highlights
Net Income (Loss)
Net income available to common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2025 totaled $61 million, or $2.49 basic and diluted earnings per share, compared to net loss of $16 million, or $0.66 loss per basic and per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2024. The results reflect an increase in noninterest income of $69 million, primarily due to a $51 million gain on a sale-leaseback transaction, $32 million in gains on our investment in PFH, and an increase of $8 million in mortgage banking income, partially offset by a $15 million loss on investment portfolio restructuring in the fourth quarter of 2025. We also had $38 million less provisions for credit losses primarily driven by improvement in the Consumer Program loan portfolio and a $7 million increase in our net interest income driven by lower interest expenses in the current year on deposits and borrowings. These increases were partially offset by an increase in noninterest expenses of $13 million driven primarily by higher personnel costs due to growth in PMC, Mortgage Warehouse, and the Panacea Division of the Bank and an increase in income tax provisions of $19 million from higher pre-tax earnings. Additional details of the changes in net income will be discussed in the remaining sections of this Results of Operations section.
Net loss attributable to common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $16.2 million, or $0.66 loss per basic and diluted share, compared to net loss of $7.8 million, or $0.32 loss per basic and diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2023. The results reflect an increase in net interest income of $5.5 million and noncontrolling interests of $6.2 million, offset by higher credit loss provisions of $18.1 million, a decline of $2.1 million in noninterest income and an increase in noninterest expense of $3.0 million. Net interest income increases were driven by higher yields on loans outpacing higher costs on deposits and the increase in noncontrolling interests were related to losses attributable to other stockholders of an entity that we are required to consolidated under U.S. GAAP in which we own approximately 19%. Noninterest income declines were driven by lower Consumer Program derivative income, partially offset by higher mortgage banking income and a gain on sale of a majority of our LPF loan portfolio. Noninterest expense increases were related primarily to higher salaries and benefits and professional fees compared to 2023, offset by no goodwill impairment in the current year. Additional details of the net loss will be discussed in the remaining sections of this Results of Operations section.
Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin
Net interest income was $111 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to $104 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. Net interest income increased as a result of interest-bearing liability costs declining more than the decline in interest-earning asset income which was significantly impacted by the sale of the Life Premium Finance loan portfolio and income reversals on charged-off Consumer Program loans. Our net interest margin for the year ended December 31, 2025 was 3.12%, compared to 2.86% for the year ended December 31, 2024. Margin increased by 26 basis points primarily from higher net interest income on lower average interest-earning assets over those periods.
Net interest income was $104.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $98.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. Our net interest margin for the year ended December 31, 2024 was 2.86%, compared to 2.68% for the year ended December 31, 2023. Our interest margin increased by 18 basis points as a result of yields on interest earning assets outpacing rates on interest bearing liabilities by 13 basis points along with average earning assets and liabilities both decreasing. This resulted in a $5.5 million increase in net interest income driven by a $27.2 million increase in interest income on loans in the current year compared to last year, partially offset by $12.0 million more interest costs on deposits and $9.6 million less income on other earning assets. Higher lending rates fueled by an increase in benchmark rates and the redeployment of excess cash into higher yielding assets drove interest income. Increase in loan interest income was driven by consumer, commercial, and commercial real estate loan income. The cost of interest bearing liabilities increased primarily due to increases in rates on all interest-bearing liabilities as a result of benchmark interest rates being higher during 2024 when compared to 2023, partially offset by a slight decrease in average interest-bearing liabilities during 2024. The interest on other earning assets declined alongside a decline in average other interest bearing assets as a result of our decision to sweep excess cash off balance sheet beginning at the end of second quarter of 2023. We had raised approximately $1.0 billion in interest bearing deposits in our digital platform during the first six months of 2023 and that amount earned interest for half of the year in 2023, but a significant portion of that cash was swept off of our balance sheet during the second half of 2023. During the year ended December 31, 2024, that cash was redeployed to other earning assets such as investment securities and loans.
For the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we had provision for credit losses of $12 million and $51 million, respectively. Decline in provision for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to December 31, 2024 was driven by higher provisions in 2024 primarily related to the Consumer Program loans. We had elevated credit losses during 2024 concentrated in the promotional portion of the Consumer Program portfolio that were largely originated between the third quarter of 2022 and first quarter of 2023 that were exiting their promotional period and defaulting. Due to the majority of these promotional loans ending their promotions in 2024 or the first quarter of 2025, significant reserving in 2024 for these loans, and coupled with our enhanced loss mitigation efforts in 2025, our provisioning for this portfolio was only $1 million during the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to $40 million during the year ended December 31, 2024.
The Company recorded a provision for credit losses of $50.6 million and $32.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The provision included amounts calculated in our normal reserve process for the Consumer Program loans which totaled $40.0 million and $29.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. We had charge-offs totaling $51.0 million and $16.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, $47.6 million and $8.8 million of charge-offs were related to the Consumer Program, respectively. There were recoveries totaling $1.9 million and $1.8 million during year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
Our provision for credit losses during 2024 and 2023 was driven by provisions related to the Consumer Program loan portfolio. Our provision for credit losses related to the Consumer Program loan portfolio were primarily driven by charge-offs centered around loans originated from the third quarter of 2022 through the first quarter of 2023. Losses on these vintages in 2024 and 2023 were $16.9 million and $7.0 million, respectively, or 61% and 79%, respectively, of total losses on the Consumer Program loan portfolio in 2024 and 2023.
Excluding the provisioning on the Consumer Program portfolio, our provision for credit losses on the remaining loan portfolio was flat year over year. The Financial Condition section of this MD&A provides information on our loan portfolio, past due loans, nonperforming assets and the allowance for credit losses.
The following table presents the categories of noninterest income for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 20232024 ($ in thousands):
Noninterest income increased 160% to $112 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to $43 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase in noninterest income was primarily driven by a $51 million gain on the sale-leaseback transaction in the fourth quarter of 2025 and the $32 million gain on our PFH investment, which comprised the gain on deconsolidation of PFH in the first quarter of 2025 and gain on the sale of a portion of our retained ownership in PFH and fair value adjustments in 2025 to the remaining common share investment retained. The increase was also driven partially by $8 million of higher income from mortgage banking activity during 2025 compared to 2024. The increase in mortgage banking income was due to higher gain on sale income driven by $922 million in loan sales during the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to $706 million of sales in 2024, a 31% increase. We also had $2 million of additional income in 2025 compared to 2024 due to gains on sales of loans. The largest portion of the gain in 2025 was due to the sale of $54 million of Panacea Division loans to another financial institution resulting in over $1 million of gains.
The increases were partially offset by a $15 million loss on sale on investment securities in the fourth quarter of 2025 that resulted from our decision to restructure the portfolio by selling securities at lower yields and purchasing securities earning higher yields, declines in Consumer Program derivative income, a $5 million gain on sale of our LPF portfolio in 2024, and income from bank-owned life insurance as a result of several one-time death benefit gains in 2024 that did not re-occur in 2025.
The decline in Consumer Program related income was a combination of less income earned from the third-party on origination of loans, which ended in January of 2025, and less reimbursement due to us when borrowers paid off their promotional loans before the end of the promotional period. These two items resulted in a combined decline of $5 million in income when comparing the year ended December 31, 2025 to the same period in 2024. Partially offsetting this decline was $2 million in lower derivative fair value losses during the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to 2024. The decline was a result of the promotional loan population declining at a faster pace during the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2025 and also because the promotional loan balances were at a lower starting point at the beginning of 2025 compared to January 1, 2024. Noninterest income from the Consumer Program is expected to be increasingly immaterial going forward as promotional loans have declined to only $3 million at the end of 2025 and we are no longer originating these loans.
Noninterest income decreased 4.7% to $43.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $45.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease in noninterest income was primarily related to $13.8 million in lower income on the Consumer Program derivative. This decrease was partially offset by $6.3 million of higher mortgage banking income and a $4.7 million gain on sale of our LPF portfolio. The Consumer Program derivative income declined primarily due to fair value loss adjustments on the derivative asset of $6.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to fair value gains of $11.3 million during the year months ended December 31, 2023. The derivative asset and related gains or losses are driven by anticipated cash payments due to us from the third-party when borrowers prepay their loans in a no-interest promotional period. During the year ended 2023, the value of the derivative and related gains were primarily driven by $52.3 million of loans with a no-interest promotional period originated in the last quarter of 2022 and the first nine months of 2023 with a total of $89.4 million of loans within their promo period as of December 31, 2023. Comparatively, during the year ended 2024 a nominal amount of no-interest promotional loans were originated and $50.5 million ended their promo period, with $38.9 million of promo loans as of December 31, 2024. Offsetting the fair value loss adjustments during the year ended December 31, 2024 and adding to the gains in 2023 was $10.6 million and $6.8 million, respectively, of realized gains as a result of borrowers paying off their promotional period loans before the end of the promotional period which triggers payment from the derivative counterparty of the interest accrued during the promotional period, along with other income due to us under the agreement.
The $6.3 million increase in mortgage banking income partially offset the total decline in noninterest income and was a result of the continued growth of the mortgage business in 2024 compared to 2023. During the year ended December 31, 2024 our mortgage banking income was driven by $15.8 million of sale gains compared to $8.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2023 as a result of higher sales volumes. The increase in gains on sale were partially offset with higher sales costs due to the higher volume.
Also partially offsetting the decrease in noninterest income was the pre-tax gain of $4.7 million, net of broker fees, from the sale of a majority of the LPF lending division loans in the fourth quarter of 2024.
The following table present the major categories of noninterest expense for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 20232024 ($ in thousands):
The higher salaries and benefits expense of $12 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024 was driven primarily due to additions of several lending teams at PMC, one of which is the top mortgage originator in the Nashville, TN market and the other is the fourth ranked VA lender in the country. These teams drove the salaries and benefits expense increase in 2025 due to their salary draws while they rebuilt their portfolios. These teams are ultimately expected to generate production that will exceed these initial salary draws, which should help to generate income that offsets the salary expenses in later periods. Increase in salaries and benefits was also from the growth in salaries and benefit expenses in the Panacea Division and Mortgage Warehouse businesses, each increasing $1 million when comparing the year-to-date periods in 2025 to 2024. Increase in salaries and benefits for the year ended December 31, 2025 also included $3 million related to restricted stock compensation expenses in 2025 compared to $1 million in 2024. The $2 million increase is a result of strong financial performance in 2025 along with improved expectations of future performance resulting in a higher expectation of issued restricted stock eventually vesting.
Occupancy expenses increased $1 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily due to increase in lease expenses driven by several additional leases in 2025, increased annual rent on existing leases, and one month of lease expense related to the new master lease for the 18 branches sold and leased back in December in the sale lease-back transaction.
FDIC insurance expense increased $1 million during the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024 primarily due to an increase in our assessment base as a result of our financial restatements in 2024 and the changes in asset quality during 2025.
These expense increases were partially offset by TPOS vendor fraud in 2024 that did not reoccur, less core deposit intangible amortization that fully amortized by June 30, 2025, and lower miscellaneous lending expenses due to less loan collection costs and lower mortgage loan repurchase provisions in 2025 compared to 2024.
Noninterest expenses were $125.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $122.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2023. The 2.5% increase in noninterest expenses was primarily attributable to higher salaries and benefits expense, professional fees, data processing costs, and other operating expenses in 2024, partially offset by the goodwill impairment and higher fraud losses recognized during the year ended December 31, 2023. The higher salaries and benefits expense was driven by growth in the mortgage line of business and higher overall benefits costs for our entire workforce. The increase in professional fees was related to expenses in connection with the SEC pre-clearance and restatement process. Data processing expenses increased primarily as a result of higher transaction volume. The other operating expenses increased primarily due to PFH operating expenses as a result of a full year of PFH operations compared to having just commenced operations at the end of 2023. These expenses are included as a result of the requirement to consolidate PFH under U.S. GAAP accounting rules, but the portion of these losses attributable to other stockholders is added back to our results to arrive at net income to Primis common shareholders.
The increase in noninterest expenses was partially offset by $11.2 million of goodwill impairment recognized in the third quarter of 2023. We had fraud losses during the year ended December 31, 2023 primarily related to a substantial increase in deposit account fraud, which was also seen across the industry during that time. Our fraud losses in 2024 were primarily due to losses in the Consumer Program loan portfolio. Other notable declines in expenses were seen in occupancy expenses, Virginia franchise tax, and gain (loss) on bank premises and equipment and assets held for sale. The Virginia franchise tax and FDIC insurance costs were a result of a decline in average deposits and capital in the current year compared to the prior year. The occupancy expense decline is primarily related to a decline in branch operating costs in 2024 as a result of our restructuring in 2023 that resulted in eight branch consolidations in the fourth quarter of 2023. Noninterest expense increases were also offset by gains on sales of premises and equipment in 2024 while in 2023 we incurred more losses due to disposal of assets and write-down of property to be sold as part of the branch consolidations.
The following illustrates key balance sheet categories as of December 31, 20242025 and 20232024 ($ in thousands):
LOAN PORTFOLIO
Loans Held for Sale
LHFS at fair value increased $81 million from December 31, 2024 to December 31, 2025 due to growth at PMC during the year and timing of origination and sale of loans at year end. LHFS at the lower of cost or market declined by $164 million primarily due to the sale of $51 million of LPF loans, paydowns of Consumer Program LHFS, and the transfer back to net loans of $102 million of Consumer Program loans in 2025 after the decision to retain these for the foreseeable future or until maturity.
Loans Held for Investment
Gross LHFI were $3.3 billion and $2.9 billion as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The increase in loans held for investment was driven by growth of mortgage warehouse loans and Panacea Division commercial loans, both of which were the primary driver of the $362 million increase in commercial loans seen below. LHFI also increased in 2025 due to the transfer back from LHFS of Consumer Program loans into the consumer loans category of LHFI, resulting in $51 million more Consumer Program loans in LHFI at December 31, 2025 compared to December 31, 2024. The growth was partially offset by the sale of $54 million of commercial loans in the Panacea Division and loan paydowns during the year ended December 31, 2025 of loans secured by real estate. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, over 50% of our loans were to customers located in Virginia and Maryland. We are not dependent on any single customer or group of customers whose insolvency would have a material adverse effect on our operations.
Gross loans held for investment were $2.9 billion and $3.2 billion as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Loans held for sale were $247.1 million and $57.7 million as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Loans held for sale at fair value are loans originated by PMC which are held at fair value under a fair value option election. Loans held for sale at the lower of cost or market comprise LPF loans to be sold to EverBank by January 31, 2025 and Consumer Program loans that are currently being marketed for sale.
As disclosed in “Note 1 - Organization and Significant Accounting Policies” in Item 8. in this Form 10-K, we entered into an agreement to sell LPF loans and $50.7 million of loans to be sold under this agreement that were already funded as of December 31, 2024 have been reclassified to loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market as of December 31, 2024. The Company also made the decision as of December 31, 2024 to sell a majority of its Consumer Program loans. $133.2 million of these loans were transferred to held for sale as of December 31, 2024 and were marked-to-market based on third party bid prices received in its initial marketing efforts for the portfolio, resulting in a $20.0 million write-down through the allowance for credit losses in accordance with regulatory guidance.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this Report, in evaluating an investment in the Company’s securities, investors should consider carefully, among other things, the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our 2025 Form 10-K, which could materially affect the Company's business, financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or future results. Please be aware that these risks may change over time and other risks may prove to be important in the future. New risks may emerge at any time, and we cannot predict such risks or estimate the extent to which they may affect our business, financial condition or results of operations, or the trading price of our securities.
There are no material changes during the period covered by this Report to the risk factors previously disclosed in our 2025 Form 10-K.
No wording changes found in this section.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Three-Month Comparison”
New heading “Six-Month Comparison”
New heading “Three-Month Comparison”
New heading “Six-Month Comparison”
New heading “Three-Month Comparison”
New heading “Six-Month Comparison”
Largest changes
“Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require us to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of March 31, 2026, that we meet all capital adequacy requirements to which we are subject.”see in full comparison
“Noninterest income increased 22% to $22 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $18 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was primarily driven by a gain of $6 million from the liquidation of an insurance agency investment and $3 million of higher income from mortgage banking activity during the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025. The 44% increase in mortgage banking income was related to an increase in funded and sold loan volume. …”see in full comparison
“For the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, we had a provision for credit losses of $5 million and $8 million, respectively. The provision during the three months ended June 30, 2026 was driven by specific reserve additions for one nonaccrual commercial real estate loan based on a re-evaluation of that borrower’s loan characteristics as of June 30, 2026 compared to March 31, 2026. A majority of the provision in the prior year was driven by the downgrade of two commercial real estate loans to substandard in the second quarter of 2025. …”see in full comparison
“During the six months ended June 30, 2026 we had $9 million higher income from mortgage banking activity compared to the same period in 2025. The increase in mortgage banking was related to a 61% increase in funded loan volume and subsequent sale of a large amount of these funded loans during 2026. PMC had a 71% increase in sold loans during the six months ended 2026 compared to the same period of 2025, resulting in $6 million higher gains on sale year-over-year. …”see in full comparison
“Professional fees increased $473 thousand in the second quarter of 2026 compared to the second quarter of 2025 and were driven during the second quarter of 2026 by a number of discrete expenses related to the settlement of a previously disclosed mortgage lawsuit. Most other noninterest expense categories increased modestly comparing the three months ended June 30, 2026 to the same period in 2025 primarily as a result of overall business growth as evidenced in the 11% growth in average earning and total assets comparing the second quarter of 2026 to 2025.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (76)
Management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) is presented to aid the reader in understanding and evaluating the financial condition and results of operations of Primis. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements, the footnotes thereto, and the other financial data included in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. Results of operations for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, are not necessarily indicative of results that may be achieved for any other period. The emphasis of this discussion will be on the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 for the condensed consolidated income statements. For the condensed consolidated balance sheets, the emphasis of this discussion will be the balances as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to December 31, 2025. This discussion and analysis contain statements that may be considered “forward-looking statements” as defined in, and subject to the protections of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. See the following section for additional information regarding forward-looking statements.
Statements and financial discussion and analysis contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q10-Q, including statements contained in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, that are not statements of historical fact constitute forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not historical facts and are instead based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, management’s beliefs and certain assumptions made by management, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and beyond our control. Accordingly, we caution you that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are inherently subject to risks, assumptions and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable as of the date made, actual results may prove to be materially different from the results expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. The words “believe,” “may,” “forecast,” “should,” “anticipate,” “contemplate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “predict,” “intend,” “continue,” “would,” “could,” “hope,” “might,” “assume,” “objective,” “seek,” “plan,” “strive” or similar words, or the negatives of these words, identify forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance or results and should not be relied upon as representing management’s views as of any subsequent date. A forward-looking statement may include a statement of the assumptions or bases underlying the forward-looking statement. We believe we have chosen these assumptions or bases in good faith and that they are reasonable. We caution you, however, that assumptions or bases almost always vary from actual results, and the differences between assumptions or bases and actual results can be material. When considering forward-looking statements, you should refer to the risk factors and other cautionary statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our periodic and current reports filed with the SEC for specific factors that could cause our actual results to be different from those expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (or an earlier date to the extent applicable). Except as required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to publicly updatedupdate or revise these forward-looking statements in light of new information or future events.
Primis Financial Corp. is the bank holding company for Primis Bank, a Virginia state-chartered bank which commenced operations on April 14, 2005. Primis Bank provides a range of financial services to individuals and small and medium-sized businesses. Primis Bank has 24 full-service branches in Virginia and Maryland and also provides services to customers through certain online and mobile applications. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, Primis had $4.3$4.4 billion in total assets, $3.4$3.5 billion in total loans held for investment, $3.4 billion in total deposits and $427$434 million in total stockholders’ equity.
We organized the core bank and lines of business in a way that we believe will drive premium operating results. Our strategy centers on growing earning assets, growing non-interest deposits, and achieving higher production and profitability in our retail mortgage business and the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was reflective of progress in these areas.
Our growth strategy is focused on driving higher production and profitability in four key areas of the company identified as the core community bank, mortgage warehouse, Panacea financial lending,financial, and PMC. The following highlights key metrics from these four areas during the first quarter of 2026:
Funding for many of our strategies (all of the above excluding the core community bank) is provided exclusively by the Bank’s digital platform powered by what we believe is one of the safest and most functional deposit accounts in the nation. Because of the scalability of the platform, there is significantly less pressure on the core community bank to provide this funding and risk the profitable, decades olddecade-old relationships with core customers. The digital platform ended the firstsecond quarter of 2026 with approximately $1.0 billion of deposits with a cost of deposits of 3.79%. The digital platform successfully grew business accounts in 2026 with small business balances reaching $28$38 million as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, up substantially from $16 million at December 31, 2025. OverApproximately 1,20074% of our digital accounts have come from referrals from otherdeposit customers and approximately 81% of our consumer accounts have been with the Bank for overat twoleast three years.
TheWe quarterexperienced strong results during the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was strong,2026, earning $7$9 million and $17 million, respectively, in net income available to common shareholders, or $0.30$0.38 and $0.68 basic and diluted earnings per common share, comparedrespectively. This compares to net income available to common shareholders of $23$2 million,million and $25 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, respectively, or $0.92$0.10 and $1.01 basic and diluted earnings per common share, forrespectively. During the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.2026 Net income available to common shareholdersresults included $25a $6 million gain on liquidation of an insurance agency investment, and during the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, results included a $7 million gain on sale of PFH shares and $32 million in sale of PFH shares and a one-time gainsgain related to the deconsolidation of PFHPFH, respectively. When excluding these gains from each period, income before income tax would have increased $9 million and $18 million during the three and six months ended MarchJune 31, 2025. When excluding the one-time gains, net income available to common shareholders grew $9 million in the first quarter of30, 2026 when compared to the same quarterperiods lastin year.2025, respectively.
The key financial drivers of the year over yearour results are noted in the following table with additional discussions following the table ($ in thousands).
Three-Month Comparison Net income available to common shareholders for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 totaled $7$9 million, or $0.30$0.38 basic and diluted earnings per share, compared to $23$2 million, or $0.92$0.10 basic and diluted earnings per share, for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. NetThe results reflect strong growth in net interest income availableof to common shareholders during the three months ended March 31, 2025 included a $25$9 million one-timedriven gainby relatedgrowth in interest income and flat interest expense. Provision for credit losses improved by $3 million due to the deconsolidationConsumer ofProgram PFH.loan Whenportfolio excludinglargely the one-time gain, net income availableshifting to commonamortizing shareholdersand grewimproved $9 million in the first quarter of 2026 whendelinquencies compared to the same quarter lastprior year and reflectsa anshift in the remaining loan portfolio mix to loan categories with lower reserve requirements. We also experienced a $4 million increase in noninterest income ofdriven $6 million primarily due toby higher mortgage banking income in the first quarter of 2026 driven by growth of PMC and higher loan sales and related gains. The results also reflect a $6 million increase in net interest income driven by an increase in interest and dividend income primarily from higher average loans held for investment balances. These are partially offset by an increase in noninterest expenses of $1 million driven by personnel expenses due to growth in PMC and aincreased decreaseloan sale gains. These increases were offset by higher noninterest expense driven by personnel costs and occupancy expenses, the former due to growth in noncontrollingPMC incomeand Mortgage Warehouse and the latter primarily a result of $4higher million.lease expense due to the sale-leaseback transaction executed in December 2025. Additional details of the changes in net income will be discussed in the remaining sections of this Results of Operations section.
Six-Month Comparison Net income available to common shareholders for the six months ended June 30, 2026 totaled $17 million, or $0.68 basic and diluted earnings per share, compared to $25 million, or $1.01 basic and diluted earnings per share, for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The decline was primarily a result of the $32 million of gains in 2025 due to deconsolidation of PFH in the first quarter of 2025 and gains from the sale of a portion of our remaining investment in PFH common share investment in the second quarter of 2025. When excluding these PFH-related gains and a $6 million one-time gain on liquidation of an insurance agency investment in 2026, income before income taxes increased in 2026 compared to the same period in 2025 by $18 million. Net interest income grew $14 million during the six months of 2026 compared to the same period in 2025 due to higher interest income and flat interest expense. Noninterest income included $9 million higher mortgage banking income and $2 million higher gain on sale of loans. Noninterest expense increased by $7 million driven by personnel costs and occupancy expenses for the same reasons as described above for the three month ended period and was partially offset by lower data processing costs. Additional details of the changes in net income will be discussed in the remaining sections of this Results of Operations section.
Three-Month Comparison
The following table details average balances of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the amount of interest earned/paid on such assets and liabilities, and the yield/rate for the periods indicated ($ in thousands):
Net interest income was $32 million for the three months ending March 31, 2026, compared to $26$34 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $25 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. Net interest income increased primarily as a result of higher average LHFS and net loans balances in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to same period in prior year whilealong with a 31 basis point increase in rates over this samethat time remainedon relativelynet stable.loans. Interest expense remainedwas relatively$120 flatthousand higher in the second quarter of 2026 compared to same period in prior year due primarily to $1 million higher expense on $102 million average borrowings mostly offset by lower interest expense on deposits due to lower rates on interestall bearinginterest-bearing deposit accounts despite deposit growth in all accounts except for time deposits in the current year. Our net interest margin for the three months endingended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was 3.43%,3.45%, compared to 3.15%2.86% for the three months endingended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. Continued rebuilding of earning asset levels coupled with increased net loan rates and favorable deposit pricing was responsible for the improvement during the firstsecond quarter of 2026. Margin increased by 28 basis points primarily from higher average interest-earning asset balances and higher net interest income when comparing the three months ending March 31, 2026 to the three months ending March 31, 2025.
Six-Month Comparison
The following table details average balances of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the amount of interest earned/paid on such assets and liabilities, and the yield/rate for the periods indicated ($ in thousands):
Net interest income was $66 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $52 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. Net interest income increased as a result of interest income increasing 15% while interest expense remained flat. Interest income increases were driven by interest earned on loans while the decline in interest expense on deposits was fully offset by an increase in interest expense on borrowings. The interest income increase was primarily a result of higher average earning assets and moderate improvement in interest rates, while interest expense was due to lower rates across all categories on higher overall average balances. Our net interest margin for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was 3.44%, compared to 3.00% for the six months ended June 30, 2025, an increase of 44 basis points.
For the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, we had a provision for credit losses of $5 million and $8 million, respectively. The provision during the three months ended June 30, 2026 was driven by specific reserve additions for one nonaccrual commercial real estate loan based on a re-evaluation of that borrower’s loan characteristics as of June 30, 2026 compared to March 31, 2026. A majority of the provision in the prior year was driven by the downgrade of two commercial real estate loans to substandard in the second quarter of 2025. Excluding the charges on these specific loans, the provision for credit losses declined $1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025 due to improved nonperforming assets, reduction in both the overall and promotional part of the Consumer Program portfolio, and a significant portion of loan growth concentrated in certain loans requiring less reserve due to their credit characteristics.
For the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, we had a provision for credit losses of $7 million and $10 million, respectively. Decline in provision for credit losses for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025 was primarily driven by the same factors as described in the three month ended period related to specific provisions on commercial real estate loans being higher in the prior year than the current year. Excluding the charges on these specific loans, the provision for credit losses declined $1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025 due to improved nonperforming assets, reduction in both the overall and promotional part of the Consumer Program portfolio, and a significant portion of loan growth concentrated in certain loans requiring less reserve due to their credit characteristics.
For both the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, we had a provision for credit losses of $2 million. The provision was flat when comparing the three months ended March 31, 2026 to March 31, 2025 as a result of provision increases in our commercial, commercial owner occupied, and warehouse loan portfolio growth being largely offset by net charge-offs in the consumer loan portfolio. See additional discussion in the Asset Quality section of this MD&A.
The Financial Condition sectionand Asset Quality sections of this MD&A provides information on our loan portfolio, past due loans, nonperforming assets and the allowance for credit losses.
Three-Month Comparison
Noninterest income increased 22% to $22 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $18 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was primarily driven by a gain of $6 million from the liquidation of an insurance agency investment and $3 million of higher income from mortgage banking activity during the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025. The 44% increase in mortgage banking income was related to an increase in funded and sold loan volume. PMC had a 58% increase in sold loans in the second quarter of 2026 compared to the same quarter of 2025, resulting in $2 million higher gains on sale in the second quarter of 2026 compared to the same quarter in 2025. Noninterest income also had a $1 million increase in gains on sale of loans year-over-year primarily driven by sales of Panacea Division commercial loans and, to a lesser extent, the sale of the guaranteed portion of SBA loans. Panacea Division and SBA loan sales are expected to continue during the last six months of 2026. These increases were partially offset by gains on sale of a portion of our PFH common shares during the three months ended June 30, 2025 and fair value adjustments to the remaining common share investment retained. Lastly, we experienced a $291 thousand increase in bank-owned life insurance income as a result of a restructure of that portfolio, which we expect to improve further in the second half of 2026 at the completion of the restructuring.
Six-Month Comparison
Noninterest income decreased 29% to $36 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $50 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease in noninterest income was primarily driven by the $32 million gain on our PFH investment, which comprised of the gain on deconsolidation of PFH in the first quarter of 2025 and gain on the sale of a portion of our ownership in PFH and fair value adjustments to the remaining common share investment retained in the second quarter of 2025. The current year included a one-time $6 million gain related to liquidation of an insurance agency investment. When excluding these gains from each year we had an increase in noninterest income of $11 million, or 62%.
During the six months ended June 30, 2026 we had $9 million higher income from mortgage banking activity compared to the same period in 2025. The increase in mortgage banking was related to a 61% increase in funded loan volume and subsequent sale of a large amount of these funded loans during 2026. PMC had a 71% increase in sold loans during the six months ended 2026 compared to the same period of 2025, resulting in $6 million higher gains on sale year-over-year. Noninterest income also increased $2 million due to gains on sale of loans year-over-year due to sales of Panacea Division commercial loans and the guaranteed portion of SBA loans, both of which are expected to continue during the second half of 2026. Lastly, we experienced a $338 thousand increase in bank-owned life insurance income as a result of a restructure of that portfolio, which we expect to improve further in the second half of 2026 at the completion of the restructuring.
Noninterest income decreased 58% to $14 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $32 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. Noninterest income included a $25 million one-time gain related to the deconsolidation of PFH during the three months ended March 31, 2025. When excluding the one-time gain, noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2026 grew $8 million compared to the same period in 2025. The increase was primarily driven by $5 million of higher income from mortgage banking activity during the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025. The 92% increase in mortgage banking income was related to an increase in funded loan volume and subsequent sale of a large amount of these funded loans during the first quarter of 2026 along with a $2 million increase in fair value gains on the portfolio in the first quarter of 2026 compared to the same quarter in 2025.
Noninterest income also had increases year-over-year as a result of gains on sale of loans of $567 thousand during the three months ended March 31, 2026, primarily related to the sale of the guaranteed portion of SBA loans driven by the Panacea Division. Consumer Program related income increased $688 thousand, driven by positive fair value adjustments on the related derivative in the first quarter of 2026 compared to negative adjustments in the same quarter in 2025. Noninterest income from the Consumer Program is expected to be increasingly immaterial going forward as promotional loans continue to decline. Meanwhile, we anticipate additional gains from loan sales during the remainder of the year generated by the Panacea Division.
Income from bank-owned life insurance increased $47 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to March 31, 2025. The Company is currently in the process of restructuring its bank-owned life insurance portfolio which is anticipated to improve noninterest income by approximately $1.2 million annually, beginning late in the second quarter of 2026.
Three-Month Comparison
Noninterest expenses increased 4%20% to $34$38 million during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $33$32 million during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The increase was primarily driven by higher salaries and benefits expensesexpenses, occupancy expenses, professional fees, and occupancyother operating expenses, partially offset by declineslower indata mostprocessing of our other noninterest expense categories.expense.
Salaries and benefits expensesexpense increased $2$3 million duringin the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to the same period in 2025. PMC accounted for most$2 million of the growth in salaries and benefits expense due to the significant growth of the business in the last year.year, while growth in the Mortgage Warehouse business and the core Bank comprised the remaining $1 million increase due to growth in these areas.
Occupancy expenses grew $1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025, primarily as a result of increased lease expense related to the sale-leaseback transaction executed in December of 2025. Other operating expense includes $1 million in payments to PFH during the second quarter of 2026 under an agreement to share the gains on sale of loans originated in the Panacea Division of the Bank and drove the change in other operating expense because prior year did not include similar amounts. The gross amount of gains on these loans is recorded in “gains on sale of loans” within noninterest income. We expect to have continued gains on sale of Panacea Division loans during the remainder of 2026 that will drive additional increases in other operating expenses due to sharing the gains with PFH.
Professional fees increased $473 thousand in the second quarter of 2026 compared to the second quarter of 2025 and were driven during the second quarter of 2026 by a number of discrete expenses related to the settlement of a previously disclosed mortgage lawsuit. Most other noninterest expense categories increased modestly comparing the three months ended June 30, 2026 to the same period in 2025 primarily as a result of overall business growth as evidenced in the 11% growth in average earning and total assets comparing the second quarter of 2026 to 2025.
Occupancy expenses grew $1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025, primarily as a result of increased lease expense related to the sale-leaseback transaction executed in December of 2025.
DataOffsetting some of the increases in noninterest expense was a decrease of $695 thousand in data processing expense decreased $661 thousand during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to the same period in 20252025. The decline in expense was driven by the reduced cost of data processing paid for our core loan and deposit systemsystems as a result of renegotiating our core data processing contract with our vendor in the second half of 2025.
Six-Month Comparison
Noninterest expenses increased 12% to $72 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $64 million during the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was primarily driven by higher salaries and benefits expenses and occupancy expenses in 2026 compared to the same period in 2025. These increases were partially offset by lower data processing expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025.
Salaries and benefits expense increased $5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025 primarily driven by the substantial growth at PMC and in the Mortgage Warehouse lending business. The 61% closed loan volume growth for PMC and 195% loan growth in Mortgage Warehouse year-over-year fueled the growth in personnel costs to support these two businesses.
Occupancy expenses increased $2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025 primarily due to increased lease expense related to the sale-leaseback transaction executed in December of 2025. Most other noninterest expense categories increased modestly comparing the six months ended June 30, 2026 to the same period in 2025 primarily as a result of overall business growth as evidenced in the 11% growth in average earning and total assets year-over-year.
Offsetting the increases in most of our noninterest expense categories was a decrease of $1 million in data processing expense during the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the same period in 2025. The decline in expense was driven by the reduced cost of data processing paid for our core loan and deposit systems as a result of renegotiating our core data processing contract with our vendor in the second half of 2025.
Professional fees decreased $365 thousand in the first quarter of 2026 compared to the first quarter of 2025 primarily due to legal, accounting, and audit related costs in the current year starting to normalize after the prior year increases that were attributable to specific non-recurring accounting events. Other operating expenses decreased $720 thousand during the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to the same period in 2025 attributable to continued overall general expense discipline across the company.
The following illustrates key balance sheet categories as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 ($ in thousands):
LHFS increased $57$66 million during the first quarter of 2026 from December 31, 2025 primarily due to the origination for sale during the quarter of $41$33 million of Panacea Financial division commercial loans and an increase of $16$33 million in PMC loans. A majority of the Panacea loans were originated in the second quarter and are expected to be sold to another financial institution a few weeks after March 31, 2026 andduring the remainderthird isquarter anticipated to be sold to the same financial institution before June 30,of 2026. The increase in PMC loans is a result of overall increase in origination volume during the quarter.
Gross LHFI were $3.4$3.5 billion and $3.3 billion as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. The increase in loans was driven by growth of mortgage warehouse loans and Panacea Division commercial loans. The growth was partially offset by loan paydowns during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 of consumer loans andconsumer, non-owner occupied commercial real estateestate, and residential 1-4 family loans. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, a majority of our loans were to customers located in Virginia and Maryland. We are not dependent on any single customer or group of customers whose insolvency would have a material adverse effect on our operations.
The composition of our loans HFI portfolio consisted of the following as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 ($ in thousands):
The following table sets forth the contractual maturity ranges of our LHFI portfolio and the amount of those loans with fixed and floating interest rates in each maturity range as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 ($ in thousands):
Our highest concentration of credit by loan type is in commercial real estate. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, 36%35% of our loan portfolio was comprised of loans secured by commercial real estate, including multi-family residential loans and loans secured by farmland. Commercial real estate loans are generally viewed as having a higher risk of default than residential real estate loans and depend on cash flows from the owner’s business or the property’s tenants to service the debt. The borrower’s cash flows may be affected significantly by general economic conditions, a downturn in the local economy, or in occupancy rates in the market where the property is located, any of which could increase the likelihood of default.
The following table presents the composition of the industry classification for commercial real estate non-owner occupied loans as a percentage of total loans for the periods ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 ($ in thousands):
The following table presents the composition of office portfolio loans for commercial real estate non-owner occupied loans, their loan count and their weighted average loan-to-value percentage as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 ($ in thousands):
The following table sets forth the contractual maturity ranges of our Consumer Program loan portfolio principal balances as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, which is only originated at fixed rates ($ in thousands):
Over the past two years our Consumer Program loan portfolio comprised a significant amount of loans that had a no-interest promotional period. A majority of these have paid-off or converted to an amortization period and as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 we only had approximately $800$250 thousand of principal amount of promotional loans that remain in a promotional period. All of these loans will end their promotional period in the next eightfour months.
The following table presents a comparison of nonperforming assets as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 ($ in thousands):
Nonperforming assets decreased $19 million, or 22%, as of June 30, 2026 compared to December 31, 2025, which was driven by one commercial relationship that was paid off through a refinance provided by an unrelated financial institution. As of June 30, 2026, all of our asset quality ratios have improved since year end as a result of our proactive management of the nonperforming asset portfolio that resulted in $26 million of loans paying off or curing out of nonaccrual or 90 days past due in the past six months.
Nonperforming assets increased $19 million, or 22%, as of March 31, 2026 compared to December 31, 2025, which was driven by an increase in loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing interest. This increase was driven by one relationship comprised of two commercial loans to a small business located within our core community bank lending footprint. Subsequent to March 31, 2026, multiple payments were made to the loans that resulted in the status of each loan reducing to approximately 40 days past due.
We believe that the allowance for credit losses as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 is sufficient to absorb future expected credit losses in our loan portfolio based on our assessment of all known factors affecting the collectability of our loan portfolio. Our assessment involves uncertainty and judgment; therefore, the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses cannot be determined with precision and may be subject to change in future periods. In addition, bank regulatory authorities, as part of their periodic examination, may require additional charges to the provision for credit losses in future periods if the results of their reviews warrant additions to the allowance for credit losses.
Our allowance for credit losses was $46 million as of both MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025. The allowance was flat during the threesix months as a result of the provision being mostly offset by net charge-offs during the period. Net charge-offs were driven by the Consumer Program portfolio and other consumercommercial loan net charge-offs.charge-offs, while meaningful recoveries were realized on the Consumer Program portfolio during the six months. The provision during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was driven by increases in growth in the commercial, commercial owner occupied, and warehouse loan portfolio balances, specific provisions determined for non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans, and charge-offs of Consumer Program loans, partially offset by a decline in commercial1-4 non-ownerfamily occupiedand multi-family residential loan balances.
Approximately half of ourOur net charge-offs were relatedprimarily driven during the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 by commercial loans and one specific borrower relationship. The borrower was in nonaccrual as of December 31, 2025 and during the six months ended June 30, 2026, we agreed to a resolution of the loan relationship resulting in $4 million of charge-offs and the remaining balance of the loans paid-off due to another financial institution providing financing to the borrower. The Consumer Program portfolio was a secondary driver of net charge-offs in both three and six months ended June 30, 2026, but was down significantly from the same periods in the prior year. During the three months ended June 30, 2026 we charged-off $1 million net of recoveries compared to $5 million during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.2025. During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026,2026 we charged-off $512$2 thousandmillion net of recoveries,recoveries incompared theto Consumer$16 Program portfolio. Comparatively,million during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, we charged-off $11 million, net of recoveries.2025. This significant improvement in net charge-offs related to the Consumer Program was a result of the reduction of the promotional loans in the portfolio over that time along with enhanced mitigation and collection efforts implemented by us to improve performance of the portfolio. The remaining balance of net charge-offs during the three months ended March 31, 2026 was related primarily to consumer loans in the Panacea division.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the principal balance outstanding of Consumer Program loans was $82$80 million, inclusive of a $5 million discount as a result of our prior decision to market a majority of the portfolio for sale, which has since been moved back to LHFI and will be run-off over time. These loans are accounted for like our other consumer loans and are not placed on nonaccrual because they are charged off when they become 90 days past due. The allowance and discounts on this portfolio plusare the discount amounts to $7 million, or 8%7% of the portfolio.portfolio principal balance. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, 94% of the outstanding principal balance was current and we had 355%457% coverage of the principal balance of loans greater than 30 days past due by the aggregate allowance and discount.
AFS and HTM investment securities totaled $179$175 million as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compareda todecrease of 2% from $178 million as of December 31, 2025, primarily due to purchases of AFS securities in the first quarter of 2026, partially offset by unrealized losses on AFS securities andwith paydowns, maturities, and calls of the AFS and HTM investments over the past six months mostly being offset by purchases of AFS securities during that time. We recognized no credit impairment charges related to credit losses on our HTM investment securities during the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
FRST insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 15 Form 4 filings (7 insiders, 19 trade dates, 13,479 shares, about $199.1K) and open-market sales in 0 filings. Net open-market shares: 13,479 (purchases minus sales); net value about $199.1K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-09 | Johnson Eric Alan |
Open-market purchase | 1,565 | $15.95 | $25.0K |
| 2026-09-01 | Johnson Eric Alan |
Open-market purchase | 1,280 | $15.60 | $20.0K |
| 2026-09-01 | Weichert Margaret M |
Open-market purchase | 100 | $15.75 | $1.6K |
| 2026-08-20 | Weichert Margaret M |
Open-market purchase | 110 | $16.00 | $1.8K |
| 2026-08-06 | Weichert Margaret M |
Open-market purchase | 100 | $16.37 | $1.6K |
| 2026-08-06 | Weichert Margaret M |
Open-market purchase | 100 | $16.27 | $1.6K |
| 2026-06-11 | Saunders Jason Brock |
Open-market purchase | 500 | $15.20 | $7.6K |
| 2026-06-09 | Garrett F L Iii |
Open-market purchase | 155 | $15.24 | $2.4K |
| 2026-06-08 | Garrett F L Iii |
Open-market purchase | 250 | $15.03 | $3.8K |
| 2026-06-05 | Garrett F L Iii |
Open-market purchase | 125 | $15.00 | $1.9K |
| 2026-06-04 | Garrett F L Iii |
Open-market purchase | 125 | $14.75 | $1.8K |
| 2026-06-03 | Garrett F L Iii |
Open-market purchase | 450 | $14.50 | $6.5K |
| 2026-06-03 | Gamble Scott R |
Open-market purchase | 1,711 | $14.59 | $25.0K |
| 2026-06-03 | Sharma Anurag |
Open-market purchase | 694 | $14.40 | $10.0K |
| 2026-06-02 | Garrett F L Iii |
Open-market purchase | 250 | $14.75 | $3.7K |
| 2026-06-01 | Garrett F L Iii |
Open-market purchase | 350 | $14.30 | $5.0K |
| 2026-06-01 | Gamble Scott R |
Open-market purchase | 1,389 | $14.39 | $20.0K |
| 2026-05-29 | Garrett F L Iii |
Open-market purchase | 250 | $14.40 | $3.6K |
| 2026-05-28 | Garrett F L Iii |
Open-market purchase | 250 | $14.50 | $3.6K |
| 2026-05-27 | Garrett F L Iii |
Open-market purchase | 250 | $14.51 | $3.6K |
| 2026-05-26 | Garrett F L Iii |
Open-market purchase | 354 | $14.49 | $5.1K |
| 2026-05-22 | Garrett F L Iii |
Open-market purchase | 290 | $14.40 | $4.2K |
| 2026-05-19 | Clagett Robert Yates |
Open-market purchase | 1,421 | $14.00 | $19.9K |
| 2026-05-14 | Clagett Robert Yates |
Open-market purchase | 1,410 | $14.16 | $20.0K |
Well-known investors holding FRST (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 923,711 | $15.1M | 0.01% | Added 121% |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 223,070 | $3.7M | 0.01% | Reduced 17% |
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 217,841 | $3.6M | 0.0% | Added 101% |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 44,690 | $731.6K | 0.0% | Reduced 20% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 38,307 | $627.1K | 0.0% | New position |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 30,226 | $494.8K | 0.0% | Reduced 59% |