Companies › FSBC

FSBC 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

Five Star Bancorp · Nasdaq · State Commercial Banks · CIK 1275168 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from Five Star Bancorp's public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

10 / 15risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
3new risk-factor headings
6Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
6Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-02-27 (period ending 2025-12-31) with 10-K filed 2025-02-28 (period ending 2024-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

10new paragraphs
15removed paragraphs
25reworded paragraphs
18,629 → 18,371words in section

New heading “Inflation can have an adverse impact on our business and on our customers.”

New heading “The adoption of artificial intelligence tools by us and our third-party vendors and service providers may increase the risk of errors, omissions, unfair treatment, or fraudulent behavior by our employees, clients, or counterparties, or other third parties.”

New heading “We could be subject to changes in tax laws, regulations and interpretations or challenges to our income tax provision.”

Removed heading “If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, or change their recommendations regarding our common stock, or if our operating results do not meet their expectations, the market price of our common stock and trading volume could decline.”

Removed heading “The holders of our debt obligations and preferred stock, if any, have priority over the holders of our common stock with respect to payment in the event of liquidation, dissolution, or winding up and with respect to the payment of interest and dividends.”

Removed heading “The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources and divert management’s attention.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: fine, artificial intelligence, ai, regulation
“Our adoption of artificial intelligence, including generative artificial intelligence, machine learning, and similar tools and technologies that collect, aggregate, analyze, or generate data or other materials or content (collectively, “AI”), for limited internal use has increased our efficiency, and we expect to continue to adopt such tools as appropriate. In addition, we expect our third-party vendors and service providers to increasingly develop and incorporate AI into their product offerings faster than we are able to do so independently. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: fine, breach, regulation
“We may also be subject to liability under various data protection laws. In the normal course of business, we collect, process, and retain sensitive and confidential information regarding our customers and employees, including personal data. As a result, we are subject to numerous laws and regulations designed to protect this information, such as U.S. federal, state, and international laws governing the protection of personally identifiable information. These laws and regulations are increasing in complexity and number. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: default, regulation
“Additionally, consumer protection initiatives or changes in state or federal law may substantially increase the time and expenses associated with the foreclosure process or prevent us from foreclosing at all. A number of states in recent years have either considered or adopted foreclosure reform laws that make it substantially more difficult and expensive for lenders to foreclose on properties in default. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: artificial intelligence
“The adoption of artificial intelligence tools by us and our third-party vendors and service providers may increase the risk of errors, omissions, unfair treatment, or fraudulent behavior by our employees, clients, or counterparties, or other third parties.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: ai, regulation, competition
“In addition, regulation of AI is rapidly evolving as federal and state legislators and regulators are increasingly focused on these powerful emerging technologies. The technologies underlying AI and its uses are subject to a variety of laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, intellectual property, data privacy and cybersecurity, consumer protection, competition, equal opportunity and fair lending laws, and are expected to be subject to increased regulation and new laws or new applications of existing laws and regulations. AI is the subject of ongoing review by various U.S. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: regulation
“We could be subject to changes in tax laws, regulations and interpretations or challenges to our income tax provision.”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (50)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 6 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Unlike many of our larger competitors that maintain significant operations located outside our market, substantially all of our customers are individuals and businesses located and doing business in the state of California. As of December 31, 2024,2025, approximately 57.66%56.89% of our real estate loans measured by dollar amount were secured by collateral located in California, substantiallya allmajority of which is in Northern California. Therefore, our success will depend upon the general economic conditions and real estate activity in these areas, which we cannot predict with certainty. As a result, our operations and profitability may be more adversely affected by a local economic downturn than those of larger, more geographically diverse competitors. A downturn in the local economy could make it more difficult for our borrowers to repay their loans, may lead to credit losses that are not offset by operations in other markets, and may also reduce the ability of depositors to make or maintain deposits with us. In addition, businesses operating in Northern California, and Sacramento in particular, depend on California state government employees for business, and reduced spending activity by such employees in the event of furloughing or termination of such employees could have an adverse impact on the success or failure of these businesses, some of which are current or could become future customers of the Bank. For these reasons, any regional or local economic downturn could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Reworded

As of December 31, 2024,2025, a significantsubstantial majorityportion of our loan portfolio was comprised of loans with real estate as a primary or secondary component of collateral, with a majority of these real estate loans concentrated in Northern California. Real property values in our market may be different from, and in some instances worse than, real property values in other markets or in the United States as a whole and may be affected by a variety of factors outside of our control and the control of our borrowers, including national and local economic conditions, generally. Declines in real estate values, including prices for homes and commercial properties, could result in a deterioration of the credit quality of our borrowers, an increase in the number of loan delinquencies, defaults, and charge-offs, and reduced demand for our products and services, generally. Our commercial real estate loans may have a greater risk of loss than residential mortgage loans, in part because these loans are generally larger or more complex to underwrite. In particular, real estate construction and land acquisition and development loans have risks not present in other types of loans, including risks associated with construction cost overruns, project completion risk, general contractor credit risk, and risks associated with the ultimate sale or use of the completed construction. In addition, declines in real property values in California could reduce the value of any collateral we realize following a default on these loans and could adversely affect our ability to continue to grow our loan portfolio consistent with our underwriting standards. We may have to foreclose on real estate assets if borrowers default on their loans, in which case we are required to record the related asset to the then-fair market value of the collateral, which may ultimately result in a loss. An increase in the level of nonperforming assets increases our risk profile and may affect the capital levels regulators believe are appropriate in light of the ensuing risk profile. Our failure to effectively mitigate these risks could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Reworded

Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control, including general economic conditions and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies and, in particular, the Federal Reserve,Reserve. whichChanges has raisedin interest rates significantlycan in 2022 and 2023. As interest rates have increased, so haveincrease competitive pressures on the deposit cost of deposit funds. ThisThese haspressures have been exacerbated by the bank failures in the first half of 2023 and the resulting heightened competition for deposits, which has also affected the interest we pay on deposits. It is not possible to predict the pace and magnitude of changes in interest rates, or the impact rate changes will have on our results of operations. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, could influence not only the interest we receive on loans and securities and the interest we pay on deposits and borrowings, but such changes could also affect our ability to originate loans and obtain deposits, the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities, and the average duration of our assets and liabilities. If the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings increase at a faster rate than the interest rates received on loans and other investments, our net interest income, and therefore earnings, could be adversely affected. Earnings could also be adversely affected if the interest rates received on loans and other investments fall more quickly than the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings. Any substantial, unexpected, or prolonged change in market interest rates could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. As of December 31, 2024,2025, significant portions of our interest-bearing liabilities were variable rate, where our variable rate liabilities reprice at a faster rate than our variable rate assets.

Reworded

In addition, an increase in interest rates could also have a negative impact on our results of operations by reducing the demand for loans, decreasing the ability of borrowers to repay their current loan obligations, and increasing early withdrawals on term deposits. These circumstances could not only result in increased loan defaults, foreclosures, and charge-offs, but also reduce collateral values and necessitate further increases to the allowance for credit losses, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. TheConversely, Federal Reserve has indicated that it expects to continue to lower the target range for the federal funds rate in 2025. Aa decrease in the general level of interest rates may affect us through, among other things, increased prepayments on our loan portfolio, and our cost of funds may not fall as quickly as yields on interest-earning assets. Our asset-liability management strategy may not be effective in mitigating exposure to the risks related to changes in market interest rates.

Added

Inflation can have an adverse impact on our business and on our customers.

Added

Inflation results in the value of assets or income from investments being worth less in the future due to a decrease in the value of money. Interest rates are likely to be higher during periods of elevated inflation and, together, these factors typically cause the value of our investment securities, particularly those with longer maturities, to decrease, although this effect is less pronounced for floating rate instruments than for fixed-rate instruments. Prolonged periods of inflation also may impact our profitability by negatively impacting our costs and expenses, including increasing funding costs and expenses related to talent acquisition and retention, and negatively impacting the demand for our products and services. Moreover, our customers are also affected by inflation and the rising costs of goods and services used in their households and businesses, which could have a negative impact on their ability to repay their loans. Adverse changes in inflation and interest rates could negatively impact consumer and business confidence, and adversely affect the economy as well as our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Reworded

We have many competitors. Our principal competitors are commercial and community banks, credit unions, savings and loan associations, mortgage banking firms and online mortgage lenders, and commercial and consumer finance companies, including large national financial institutions that operate in our market. Many of these competitors are larger than we are, have significantly more resources, greater brand recognition, and more extensive and established branch networks or geographic footprints than we do, and may be able to attract customers more effectively than we can. Because of their scale, many of these competitors can be more aggressive on loan and deposit pricing than we can and may better afford and make broader use of media advertising, support services, and electronic technology than we do. Also, many of our non-bank competitors have fewer regulatory constraints and may have lower cost structures. Additionally, financial technology companies and other firms have begun to offer services such as stablecoins that may serve as alternatives to traditional banking products such as deposits. We compete with these other financial institutionscompanies both in attracting deposits and making loans. We expect competition to continue to increase as a result of legislative, regulatory, and technological changes, the continuing trend of consolidation in the financial services industry, and the emergence of alternative banking sources. Our profitability in large part depends upon our continued ability to compete successfully with traditional and new financial services providers, some of which maintain a physical presence in our market and others of which maintain only a virtual presence. Increased competition could require us to increase the rates we pay on deposits or lower the rates that we offer on loans, which could reduce our profitability.

Reworded

Additionally, like many of our competitors, we rely on customer deposits as our primary source of funding for our lending activities, and we continue to seek and compete for customer deposits to maintain this funding base. Our future growth will largely depend on our ability to retain and grow our deposit base. Although we have historically maintained a high deposit customer retention rate, these deposits are subject to potentially dramatic fluctuations in availability or price due to certain factors outside of our control, such as increasing competitive pressures for deposits, changes in interest rates and returns on other investment classes, customer perceptions of our financial health and general reputation, and a loss of confidence by customers in us or the banking sector generally, which could result in significant outflows of deposits within short periods of time or significant changes in pricing necessary to maintain current customer deposits or attract additional deposits. Additionally, any such loss of funds could result in lower loan originations, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Our failure to compete effectively in our market could restrain our growth or cause us to lose market share, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Added

Additionally, any such loss of funds could result in lower loan originations, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Our failure to compete effectively in our market could restrain our growth or cause us to lose market share, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Reworded

Commercial real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans, and construction loans are more susceptible to a risk of loss during a downturn in the business cycle. In particular, the increase in working from home since outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic could have adverse effects on our loans for office space, which are dependent for repayment on the successful operation and management of the associated commercial real estate. Our underwriting, review, and monitoring cannot eliminate all the risks related to these loans.

Removed

Additionally, consumer protection initiatives or changes in state or federal law may substantially increase the time and expenses associated with the foreclosure process or prevent us from foreclosing at all. A number of states in recent years have either considered or adopted foreclosure reform laws that make it substantially more difficult and expensive for lenders to foreclose on properties in default. Additionally, federal and state regulators and state attorneys general have prosecuted or pursued enforcement action against a number of mortgage servicing companies for alleged consumer protection law violations. If new federal or state laws or regulations are ultimately enacted that significantly raise the cost of foreclosure or raise outright barriers to foreclosure, they could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Reworded

One component of our business consists of originating and periodically selling U.S. government-guaranteed loans, in particular those guaranteed by the SBA. Pursuant to the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, the SBA guaranteed 90% of the principal amount of each qualifying SBA loan originated under the SBA’sits 7(a) loan program through October 1, 2021.program. The SBA presently guarantees 75% to 90% of the principal amount of qualifying loans originated under the 7(a) loan program. The U.S. government may not maintain the SBA 7(a) loan program, and even if it does, the guaranteed portion may not remain at its current or anticipated level. In addition, from time to time, the governmentSBA agencies that guarantee these loansmay reach theirits internalfunding limits and cease to guarantee future loans. In addition, thesethe agenciesSBA may change theirits rules for qualifying loans or Congress may adopt legislation that would have the effect of discontinuing or changing the loan guarantee programs. Non-governmental programs could replace government programs for some borrowers, but the terms might not be equally acceptable. Therefore, if these changes occur, the volume of loans to small business and industrial borrowers of the types that now qualify for government-guaranteed loans could decline. Also, the profitability of the sale of the guaranteed portion of these loans could decline as a result of market displacements due to increases in interest rates, and premiums realized on the sale of the guaranteed portions could decline from current levels. As the funding and sale of the guaranteed portion of SBA 7(a) loans is a major portion of our business and a significant portion of our non-interest income, any significant changes to the SBA 7(a) loan program, such as its funding or eligibility requirements, may have an unfavorable impact on our prospects, future performance, and results of operations. The aggregate principal balance of SBA 7(a) guaranteed portions sold during the year ended December 31, 2024 was approximately $18.3 million, compared to approximately $36.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.

Added

If these changes occur, the volume of loans to small business and industrial borrowers of the types that now qualify for government-guaranteed loans could decline. Also, the profitability of the sale of the guaranteed portion of these loans could decline as a result of market displacements due to increases in interest rates, and premiums realized on the sale of the guaranteed portions could decline from current levels. Any significant changes to the SBA 7(a) loan program, such as its funding or eligibility requirements, may have an unfavorable impact on our prospects, future performance, and results of operations. The aggregate principal balance of SBA 7(a) loans with government-guaranteed portions sold during the year ended December 31, 2025 was approximately $3.3 million, compared to approximately $18.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Removed

In addition, current or future delays to, reductions of, and/or cancellations of certain federal government payments in connection with cost-saving and government efficiency efforts undertaken by the Trump Administration may lead to increased repayment risk from clients of the Bank who rely on payments from the federal government in conducting their businesses. Potential losses could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Reworded

The rapid rise in interest rates during 2022 and 2023 andWhile the resulting industry-wide reduction in the fair value of securities portfolios, among other events, have resulted in a current state of volatility and uncertainty with respect to the health of the United States banking system.system Therehas isabated somewhat since the bank failures that occurred in the spring of 2023, there remains heightened awareness around liquidity, uninsured deposits, deposit composition, unrecognized investment losses, and capital.capital among counterparties, customers, and regulators. We are exposed to different industries and counterparties through transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including broker-dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, and other financial intermediaries. As a result, defaults by, declines in the financial condition of, or even rumors or questions about one or more financial services companies, or the financial services industry generally, could lead to market-wide liquidity problems and losses or defaults by us or other institutions. These losses could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Reworded

Our largest deposit relationships currently make up a material percentage of our deposits and the withdrawal of deposits by our largest depositorsdepositors, or withdrawals of other large deposits over a short period of time, could force us to fund our business through more expensive and less stable sources.

Reworded

At December 31, 2024,2025, our 4953 largest deposit relationships, each accounting for more than $10.0 million, amounted to $1.8$2.0 billion, or 50.35%47.82% of our total deposits. This includes $674.1$789.6 million in deposits from municipalities, of which we conduct a monthly review. Withdrawals of deposits by any one of our largest depositors or by one of our related customer groups could force us to rely more heavily on borrowings and other sources of funding for our business and withdrawal demands, adversely affecting our net interest margin and results of operations. If a significant amount of these deposits, or other large deposits, including deposits that exceed applicable FDIC insurance limits, were withdrawn within a short period of time, it could have a negative impact on our short-term liquidity and have an adverse impact on our earnings. The ease and speed of the electronic withdrawals may increase this risk. We may also be forced, as a result of withdrawals of deposits, to rely more heavily on other, potentially more expensive and less stable, funding sources. Additionally, such circumstances could require us to raise deposit rates in an attempt to attract new deposits, which would adversely affect our results of operations, and/or to raise funding through brokered deposits. Moreover, obtaining adequate funding to meet our deposit obligations may be more challenging during periods of elevated interest rates and financial industry instability. Our ability to attract depositors during a time of actual or perceived distress or instability in the marketplace may be limited. Under applicable regulations, if the Bank were no longer “well-capitalized,” the Bank would not be able to accept brokered deposits without the approval of the FDIC.

Reworded

The banking industry is highly regulated and supervised under both federal and state laws and regulations that are intended primarily for the protection of depositors, customers, the public, the banking system as a whole, and/or the FDIC DIF, not for the protection of our shareholders and creditors. We are subject to regulation and supervision by the Federal Reserve, and our Bank is subject to regulation and supervision by the FDIC and the DFPI. Compliance with these laws and regulations can be difficult and costly, and changes to laws and regulations can impose additional compliance costs. The Dodd-Frank Act, which imposed significant regulatory and compliance changes on financial institutions, is an example of this type of federal law. The laws and regulations applicable to us govern a variety of matters, including permissible types, amounts, and terms of loans and investments we may make, the maximum interest rate that may be charged, the amount of reserves we must hold against deposits we take, the types of deposits we may accept and the rates we may pay on such deposits, maintenance of adequate capital and liquidity, changes in control of us and our Bank, transactions between us and our Bank, handling of nonpublic information, restrictions on dividends, and establishment of new offices. We must obtain approval from our regulators before engaging in certain activities, and there is risk that such approvals may not be granted, either in a timely manner or at all. These requirements may constrain our operations, and the adoption of new laws and changes to or repeal of existing laws may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Also, the burden imposed by those federal and state regulations may place banks in general, including our Bank in particular, at a competitive disadvantage compared to their non-bank competitors. Compliance with current and potential regulation, as well as supervisory scrutiny by our regulators, may significantly increase our costs, impede the efficiency of our internal business processes, require us to increase our regulatory capital, and limit our ability to pursue business opportunities in an efficient manner by requiring us to expend significant time, effort, and resources to ensure compliance and respond to any regulatory inquiries or investigations. Our failure to comply with any applicable laws or regulations, interpretations of such laws and regulations, or regulatory policies could result in sanctions by regulatory agencies, civil money penalties, and/or damage to our reputation, all of which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Reworded

The Federal Reserve,Reserve periodically examines our business, and the FDIC,FDIC and the DFPI periodically examine ourthe business,business of the Bank, including our compliance with laws and regulations. If, as a result of an examination, the Federal Reserve, the FDIC, or the DFPI were to determine that our or the Bank’s financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, earnings prospects, management, liquidity, or other aspects of any of our or the Bank’s operations had become unsatisfactory, or that we or the Bank were in violation of any law or regulation, they may take a number of different remedial actions as they deem appropriate. These actions may include requiring us or the Bank to remediate any such adverse examination findings.

Reworded

In addition, these agencies have the power to take enforcement action against us and/or the Bank to enjoin “unsafe or unsound” practices, to require affirmative action to correct any conditions resulting from any violation of law or regulation or unsafe or unsound practice, to issue an administrative order that can be judicially enforced, to direct an increase in our capital, to direct the sale of subsidiaries or other assets, to limit dividends and distributions, to restrict our growth, to assess civil money penalties against us or our officers or directors, to remove officers and directors, and, if it is concluded that such conditions cannot be corrected or there is imminent risk of loss to depositors, to terminate ourthe Bank’s deposit insurance and place the Bank into receivership or conservatorship. Any regulatory enforcement action against us or the Bank could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Reworded

TheWe are subject to extensive and evolving federal and state fair lending laws and regulations. For example, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, and other fair lending laws and regulations, including state laws and regulations, prohibit discriminatory lending practices by financial institutions. The Federal Trade Commission Act prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices, and the Dodd-Frank Act prohibits unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices by financial institutions. The FDIC, the U.S. Department of Justice, federal and state banking agencies, and/or other federal and state agencies, including the CFPB,agencies are responsible for enforcing these fair and responsible banking laws and regulations. Banks with no more than $10.0 billion in total consolidated assets, including the Bank, are subject to rules promulgated by the CFPB but are examined and supervised by federal banking agencies for compliance with federal consumer protection laws and regulations. The CFPB has issued rules that restrict or place conditions on various fees that financial institutions can charge consumers, including credit card late fees and overdraft fees. Although these rules have been challenged in court, and leadership of the CFPB during the Trump Administration has taken steps to curtail the CFPB’s regulatory activities, in general CFPB rulemaking has the potential to have a significant impact on the operations of the Bank.

Reworded

A successful regulatory challenge to an institution’s compliance with fair andlending responsibleor bankingconsumer protection laws and regulations could result in a wide variety of sanctions, including damages and civil money penalties, injunctive relief, restrictions on mergers and acquisitions activity, restrictions on expansion, and restrictions on entering new business lines. Private parties may also have the ability to challenge an institution’s performance under fair lending laws in private litigation, including through class action litigation. In addition, an institution’s receipt of a less-than-Satisfactory CRA rating, which could result from a violation of fair lending or consumer protection laws or from an unsatisfactory record of meeting the credit needs of low- and moderate-income communities, could similarly result in an inability of the institution to engage in mergers or other expansionary activity. Such actions and limitations could have ana material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Reworded

In addition, the Federal Reserve requires a bank holding company to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to its subsidiary banks and to commit resources to support its subsidiary banks. Under thethis “source of strength” doctrine that was codified by the Dodd-Frank Act,doctrine, the Federal Reserve may require a bank holding company to make capital injections into a subsidiary bank, including at times when the bank holding company may not be inclined to do so, and may charge the bank holding company with engaging in unsafe and unsound practices for failure to commit resources to such a subsidiary bank. Accordingly, we could be required to provide financial assistance to the Bank if it experiences financial distress.

Removed

•the failure of securities analysts to cover, or to continue to cover, us;

Removed

•reports related to the impact of natural or man-made disasters in our market;

Removed

•fluctuations in the market price of our common stock and operating results of our competitors;

Reworded

•changes or proposed changes in laws or regulations, or differing interpretations thereof, affecting our business, or enforcement of these laws or regulations; or

Removed

•new technology used, or services offered, by competitors;

Removed

•additional investments from third parties; or

Reworded

•geopolitical conditions suchor as actsnatural or threatsman ofmade terrorism, pandemics, or military conflicts.disasters.

Reworded

Upon the closing of our IPO, our directors, executive officers, and principal shareholders beneficially owned an aggregate of 5,881,682 shares, or approximately 34.47% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock at the time. As of December 31, 2025, our directors, executive officers, and principal shareholders beneficially owned an aggregate of 9,955,654, or approximately 46.59% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock. Consequently, our directors, executive officers, and principal shareholders are able to significantly affect our affairs and policies, including the outcome of the election of directors and the potential outcome of other matters submitted to a vote of our shareholders, such as mergers, the sale of substantially all of our assets, and other extraordinary corporate matters. This influence may also have the effect of delaying or preventing changes of control or changes in management or limiting the ability of our other shareholders to approve transactions that they may deem to be in the best interests of our Company. The interests of these insiderssignificant shareholders could conflict with the interests of our other shareholders, including you.

Removed

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, or change their recommendations regarding our common stock, or if our operating results do not meet their expectations, the market price of our common stock and trading volume could decline.

Removed

The trading market for our common stock depends in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more of the analysts who covers us downgrades our stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, or our operating results do not meet their expectations, either absolutely or relative to our competitors, the market price of our common stock would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of us or fail to publish reports on us regularly, we would lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause the market price of our common stock or trading volume to decline. If we fail to meet the expectations of analysts for our operating results, the market price of our common stock would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which could cause the market price of our common stock and trading volume to decline.

Removed

The holders of our debt obligations and preferred stock, if any, have priority over the holders of our common stock with respect to payment in the event of liquidation, dissolution, or winding up and with respect to the payment of interest and dividends.

Removed

In any liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, our common stock would rank below all claims of debt holders against us as well as any preferred stock that has been issued. As of December 31, 2024, we had outstanding an aggregate of $73.9 million of subordinated notes, net of debt issuance costs, outstanding, and we did not have any outstanding preferred stock or trust preferred securities. We could incur future debt obligations or issue preferred stock in the future to raise additional capital. In such event, holders of our common stock will not be entitled to receive any payment or other distribution of assets upon the liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company until after all of our obligations to the debt holders are satisfied and holders of subordinated notes and senior equity securities, including preferred shares, if any, have received any payment or distribution due to them. In addition, we are required to pay interest on the subordinated notes and dividends on the trust preferred securities and preferred stock before we will be able to pay any dividends on our common stock. Since any decision to issue debt securities or incur other borrowings in the future will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, the amount, timing, nature, or success of our future capital raising efforts is uncertain. Thus, holders of our common stock bear the risk that our future issuances of debt securities or our incurrence of other borrowings will negatively affect the market price of our common stock.

Added

California corporate law and provisions of our amended and restated articles of incorporation (“articles of incorporation”) and our second amended and restated bylaws (“bylaws”) could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so would be perceived to be beneficial by our shareholders.

Reworded

California corporate law and provisions of our amended and restated articles of incorporation (“articles of incorporation”) and our second amended and restated bylaws (“bylaws”) could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so would be perceived to be beneficial by our shareholders. Furthermore, with certain limited exceptions, federal regulations prohibit a person, company, or group of persons deemed to be “acting in concert” from, directly or indirectly, acquiring 10% or more (5% or more if the acquirer is a bank holding company) of any class of our voting stock or obtaining the ability to control in any manner the election of a majority of our directors or otherwise direct the management or policies of our Company without prior notice or application to and the approval of the Federal Reserve.Reserve and the DFPI is generally required for any person to acquire control of the Company. Under federal and state laws, a person may be presumed to acquire control of the Company if the person acquires 10% or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock. In addition, Federal Reserve approval is also generally required for a bank holding company to acquire more than 5% or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock. Accordingly, prospective investors must comply with these requirements, if applicable, in connection with any purchase of shares of our common stock. Collectively, provisions of our articles of incorporation and bylaws and other statutory and regulatory provisions may delay, prevent, or deter a merger, acquisition, tender offer, proxy contest, or other transaction that might otherwise result in our shareholders receiving a premium over the market price for their common stock. Moreover, the combination of these provisions effectively inhibits certain business combinations, which, in turn, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Removed

The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources and divert management’s attention.

Removed

As a public company, we incur significant legal, accounting, insurance, and other expenses. We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and applicable securities rules and regulations. These laws and regulations increase the scope, complexity, and cost of corporate governance, reporting, and disclosure practices over those of non-public or non-reporting companies. Despite our conducting business in a highly regulated environment, these laws and regulations have different requirements for compliance than we experienced prior to becoming a public company. Among other things, the Exchange Act requires that we file annual, quarterly, and current reports with respect to our business and operating results and maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. As a Nasdaq-listed company, we are required to prepare and file proxy materials which meet the requirements of the Exchange Act and the SEC’s proxy rules. Compliance with these rules and regulations has increased, and will continue to increase, our legal and financial compliance costs, will make some activities more difficult, time-consuming, or costly, and will increase demand on our systems and resources, particularly after we are no longer an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act. In order to maintain, appropriately document and, if required, improve our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting to meet the standards required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, significant resources and management oversight may be required. As a result, management’s attention may be diverted from other business concerns, which could harm our business and operating results. Additionally, any failure by us to file our periodic reports with the SEC in a timely manner could harm our reputation and cause our investors and potential investors to lose confidence in us, and restrict trading in, and reduce the market price of, our common stock, and potentially impact our ability to access the capital markets.

Reworded

A key differentiating factor for our business is the strong reputation we are building in our market. Maintaining a positive reputation is critical to attracting and retaining customers and employees. Adverse perceptions of us could make it more difficult for us to execute on our strategy. Harm to our reputation can arise from many sources, including actual or perceived employee misconduct, errors or misconduct by our third-party vendors or other counterparties, litigation or regulatory actions, our failure to meet our high customer service and quality standards, system failures, cybersecurity breaches, and compliance failures.

Reworded

Furthermore, third-party service providers, and banking organizations’ relationships with those providers, are subject to demanding regulatory requirements and attention by bank regulators. These regulatory expectations may change, and potentially become more rigorous in certain ways, due to an interagency effort to replace existing guidance on the risk management of third-party relationships with new guidance.ways. Our regulators may hold us responsible for any deficiencies in our oversight or control of our third-party service providers and in the performance of the parties with which we have these relationships. As a result, if our regulators assess that we have not exercised adequate oversight and control over our third-party service providers or that such providers have not performed adequately, we could be subject to administrative penalties, fines, or other forms of regulatory enforcement action as well as requirements for consumer remediation, any of which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Reworded

Ensuring that our collection, use, transfer, and storage of PII complies with all applicable laws and regulations can increase our costs. Furthermore, we may not be able to ensure that customers and other third parties have appropriate controls in place to protect the confidentiality of the information that they exchange with us, particularly where such information is transmitted by electronic means. If any person, including any of our employees, negligently disregards or intentionally breaches our established controls with respect to personal, confidential, or proprietary information of customers or othersothers, or if that data were otherwise to be mishandled or misused (in situations where, for example, such information was erroneously provided to parties who are not permitted to have the information, or where such information was intercepted or otherwise compromised by third parties), we could be exposed to litigation or regulatory sanctions under privacy and data protection laws and regulations. Concerns regarding the effectiveness of our measures to safeguard PII, or even the perception that such measures are inadequate, could cause us to lose customers or potential customers and thereby reduce our revenues. Accordingly, any failure or perceived failure to comply with applicable privacy or data protection laws and regulations may subject us to inquiries, examinations, and investigations that could result in requirements to modify or cease certain operations or practices or in significant liabilities, fines, penalties, regulatory enforcement actions, and/or penalties,criminal prosecution and could damage our reputation and otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Depending on the circumstances giving rise to the breach, this liability may not be subject to a contractual limit or an exclusion of consequential or indirect damages.

Reworded

Information security risks for financial institutions like us have increased recently in part because of new technologies, such as artificial intelligence, the use of the internet, cloud, and telecommunications technologies (including mobile devices) to conduct financial and other business transactions, and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, perpetrators of fraud, hackers, terrorists, and others. Additionally, like many large enterprises, we have introduced more remote work arrangements for our employees. The increase in remote work arrangements over the past few years has introduced potential new vulnerabilities to cyber threats. We also face increased cybersecurity risk as we deploy additional technologies and digital solutions, including our website and digital banking platform with complementary treasury management solutions. Moreover, any cyber-attack or other security breach may persist for an extended period of time without detection. We endeavor to design and implement policies and procedures to identify such cyber-attacks or breaches as quickly as possible; however, we expect that any investigation of a cyber-attack or breach would take substantial amounts of time, and that there may be extensive delays before we obtain full and reliable information. During such time we would not necessarily know the extent of the harm or how best to remediate it, and certain errors or actions could be repeated or compounded before they are discovered and remediated, all of which would further increase the costs and consequences of such an attack or breach. Notwithstanding the strength of defensive measures, cybersecurity threats and the tactics, techniques, and procedures used in cyberattacks change, develop, and evolve rapidly and continuously, including from emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence, which may be used to enhance the tactics, techniques, and procedures described above and facilitate new cyber threats.

Added

The adoption of artificial intelligence tools by us and our third-party vendors and service providers may increase the risk of errors, omissions, unfair treatment, or fraudulent behavior by our employees, clients, or counterparties, or other third parties.

Added

Our adoption of artificial intelligence, including generative artificial intelligence, machine learning, and similar tools and technologies that collect, aggregate, analyze, or generate data or other materials or content (collectively, “AI”), for limited internal use has increased our efficiency, and we expect to continue to adopt such tools as appropriate. In addition, we expect our third-party vendors and service providers to increasingly develop and incorporate AI into their product offerings faster than we are able to do so independently. There are significant risks involved in utilizing AI and no assurance can be provided that our or our third-party vendors’ or service providers’ use of AI will enhance our or our third-party vendors’ or service providers’ products or services or produce the intended results. The adoption and incorporation of such tools can lead to concerns around safety and soundness, fair access to financial services, fair treatment of consumers, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Such risk can result from models being poorly designed or faulty data being used, inadequate model testing or validation, narrow or limited human oversight, inadequate planning or due diligence, inappropriate or controversial data practices by developers or end-users, and other factors adversely affecting public opinion of AI and the acceptance of AI solutions. Furthermore, given the pace of rapid adoption of such tools by vendors and service providers, we may not be aware of the addition of AI solutions prior to such tools being introduced into our environment. Failure to adequately manage AI risks can result in erroneous results and decisions made by misinformation, unwanted forms of bias, unauthorized access to sensitive, confidential, proprietary or personal information, and violations of applicable laws and regulations, leading to operational inefficiencies, competitive harm, reputational harm, ethical challenges, legal liability, losses, fines, and other adverse impacts on our business and financial results. If we do not have sufficient rights to use the data or other material or content on which the AI tools we use rely, or to use the output of such AI tools, we also may incur liability through the violation of applicable laws and regulations, third-party intellectual property, privacy, or other rights or contracts to which we are a party.

Added

In addition, regulation of AI is rapidly evolving as federal and state legislators and regulators are increasingly focused on these powerful emerging technologies. The technologies underlying AI and its uses are subject to a variety of laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, intellectual property, data privacy and cybersecurity, consumer protection, competition, equal opportunity and fair lending laws, and are expected to be subject to increased regulation and new laws or new applications of existing laws and regulations. AI is the subject of ongoing review by various U.S. governmental and regulatory agencies, and various U.S. states are applying, or are considering applying, existing laws and regulations to AI or are considering general legal frameworks for AI. We may not be able to anticipate how to respond to these rapidly evolving frameworks, and we may need to expend resources to adjust our operations or offerings in certain jurisdictions if the legal frameworks are inconsistent across jurisdictions. Moreover, because AI technology itself is highly complex and rapidly developing, it is not possible to predict all of the legal, operational, or technological risks that may arise relating to the use of AI.

Removed

The SEC enacted rules, effective as of December 18, 2023, requiring public companies to disclose material cybersecurity incidents that they experience on Form 8-K within four business days of determining that a material cybersecurity incident has occurred and to disclose on an annual basis material information regarding their cybersecurity risk management, strategy, and governance. If we fail to comply with these new requirements we could incur regulatory fines in addition to other adverse consequences to our reputation, business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Removed

We may also be subject to liability under various data protection laws. In the normal course of business, we collect, process, and retain sensitive and confidential information regarding our customers and employees, including personal data. As a result, we are subject to numerous laws and regulations designed to protect this information, such as U.S. federal, state, and international laws governing the protection of personally identifiable information. These laws and regulations are increasing in complexity and number. If any person, including any of our employees, negligently disregards or intentionally breaches our established controls with respect to client or employee data, or otherwise mismanages or misappropriates such data, we could be subject to significant monetary damages, regulatory enforcement actions, fines and/or criminal prosecution. In addition, unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential client or employee data, whether through system failure, employee negligence, fraud, or misappropriation, could damage our reputation and cause us to lose clients and related revenue. Potential liability in the event of a security breach of client data could be significant. Depending on the circumstances giving rise to the breach, this liability may not be subject to a contractual limit or an exclusion of consequential or indirect damages.

Added

We could be subject to changes in tax laws, regulations and interpretations or challenges to our income tax provision.

Added

We compute our income tax provision based on enacted tax rates in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Any change in enacted tax laws, rules, or regulatory or judicial interpretations, or any change in the pronouncements relating to accounting for income taxes, could adversely affect our effective tax rate, tax payments, and results of operations. For example, on July 4, 2025, the President signed H.R. 1, the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” into law. The legislation includes several changes to federal tax law that generally allow for more favorable deductibility of certain business expenses beginning in 2025, including the restoration of immediate expensing of domestic R&D expenditures, reinstatement of 100% bonus depreciation, and more favorable rules for determining the limitation on business interest expense. The Act also made certain changes to the deductibility of the cost of meals and charitable contributions that are effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2025. The Company evaluated the impact on future periods and the legislation is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Additionally, the taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which we operate may challenge our tax positions, which could increase our effective tax rate and harm our financial position and results of operations. We are subject to audit and review by U.S. federal and state tax authorities. Any adverse outcome of such a review or audit could have a negative effect on our financial position and results of operations. In addition, changes in enacted tax laws, such as adoption of a lower income tax rate in any of the jurisdictions in which we operate, could impact our ability to obtain the future tax benefits represented by our deferred tax assets. Also, the determination of our provision for income taxes and other liabilities requires significant judgment by management. Although we believe that our estimates are reasonable, the ultimate tax outcome may differ from the amounts recorded in our financial statements and could have a material adverse effect on our financial results in the period or periods for which such determination is made.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

9new paragraphs
14removed paragraphs
48reworded paragraphs
12,018 → 11,546words in section

Removed heading “S Corporation Status”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: restatement, penalt
“The termination of our status as an S Corporation may also affect our financial condition and cash flows. Historically, we made quarterly cash distributions to our shareholders in amounts estimated by us to be sufficient for them to pay estimated individual U.S. federal and California state income tax liabilities resulting from our taxable income that was “passed through” to them. However, these distributions were not consistent, as sometimes the distributions were less than or in excess of the shareholders’ estimated U.S. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: default, fine
“During the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, we refined our methodology of measuring the ACL on three pools of loans: Multifamily, C&I SBA, and CRE Non-Owner Occupied loans. Within the Multifamily pool, Manufactured Home Community (“MHC”) loans were segregated from traditional Multifamily as we identified a data source to provide sufficient historical peer loss data specific to MHC loans. This segregation now adjusts for differences in the risk characteristics and performance of MHCs compared to traditional Multifamily properties. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: downgrade

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Loans designated as watch anddecreased substandard,from which$123.4 are not considered adversely classified, increasedmillion to $126.0$101.9 million atbetween December 31, 2024 from $41.6 million atand December 31, 2023.2025. The increase related primarily to an $83.8 million increase inConsequently, loans designated as watchsubstandard forincreased loansfrom which$2.6 havemillion indicatorsto $22.3 million between December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2025, primarily attributable to the downgrade of deficientone borrower experiencing financial difficulty with a special purpose commercial real estate loan quality and potentiala significantcommercial issuesline whichof are expected to be temporary in nature.credit. There were no loans with doubtful risk grades at December 31, 20242025 or December 31, 2023.2024.
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: fine
“Total cash and cash equivalents were $352.3 million at December 31, 2024, an increase of $30.8 million from $321.6 million at December 31, 2023. The increase in cash and cash equivalents was primarily due to increases in deposits of $531.1 million, $80.9 million in net proceeds from the 2024 Public Offering (as defined below), and pre-tax income of $64.7 million, partially offset by loan originations, net of repayments, of $442.8 million and a decrease in borrowings of $170.0 million.”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“S Corporation Status”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: fine

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

TheLoans banking industry defines loans graded substandard or doubtfuldesignated as “classifiedwatch” loans.are internal bank designations and are not considered adversely classified. However, loans designated as “substandard” or “doubtful” are considered adversely classified. Table 1413 shows loans by credit quality risk rating as of the periods indicated.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (71)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 34 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Headquartered in the greater Sacramento metropolitan area of California, Five Star Bancorp (“Bancorp” or the “Company”) is a bank holding company that operates through its wholly owned subsidiary, Five Star Bank, a California state-chartered non-member bank. We provide a broad range of banking products and services to small and medium-sized businesses, professionals, and individuals primarily in Northern California through eightnine branch offices. Our mission is to strive to become the top business bank in all markets we serve through exceptional service, deep connectivity, and customer empathy. We are dedicated to serving real estate, agricultural, faith-based, and small to medium-sized enterprises. We aim to consistently deliver value that meets or exceeds the expectations of our shareholders, customers, employees, business partners, and community. We refer to our mission as “purpose-driven and integrity-centered banking.” At December 31, 2024,2025, we had total assets of $4.1$4.8 billion, total loans held for investment of $3.5$4.1 billion, and total deposits of $3.6$4.2 billion.

Reworded

Interest rates have risen significantly following the historically low levels during the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to elevated levels of inflation and corresponding pressure to raise interest rates, the Federal Reserve announced in January 2022 that it would be slowing the pace of its bond purchasing and increasing the target range for the federal funds rate over time. The Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) then increased the target range eleven times throughout 2022 and 2023. During 2024,2024 and 2025, the Federal Reserve decreased the federal funds rate three times.times each year. As of December 31, 2024,2025, the target range for the federal funds rate had been decreased to 4.25%3.50% to 4.50%,3.75%, and the FOMC signaledprojects thatone currentadditional economic data and the interest rate environment are more balanced, projecting two decreasesdecrease in 2025,2026, as part of a strategy to return inflation to normalized levels.levels while keeping unemployment low.

Reworded

We anticipate that interest rates may be lowered over the next few years. Based on our liabilitysensitivity sensitivity,analysis, a steepened yield curve could have a beneficialslight negative impact on our net interest income.income over the next year. Additionally, a continued flat yield curve would be expected to maintain our net interest income.income over the next year.

Removed

S Corporation Status

Removed

Beginning at our inception, we elected to be taxed for U.S. federal income tax purposes as an S Corporation. In conjunction with our IPO, we filed consents from the requisite amount of our shareholders to revoke our S Corporation election with the IRS, resulting in the commencement of our taxation as a C Corporation for U.S. federal and California state income tax purposes in the second quarter of fiscal year 2021. Prior to such revocation, our earnings were not subject to and we did not pay U.S. federal income tax, and we were not required to make any provision or recognize any liability for U.S. federal income tax in our consolidated financial statements. While we were not subject to and did not pay U.S. federal income tax, we were subject to and paid California S Corporation income tax at a current rate of 3.50%. Upon the termination of our status as an S Corporation, we commenced paying U.S. federal income tax and a higher California state income tax on our taxable earnings for each year (including the short year beginning on the date our status as an S Corporation terminated), and our consolidated financial statements reflect a provision for U.S. federal income tax and a higher California state income tax from that date forward. As a result of this change, the net income and EPS data presented in our historical financial statements for periods prior to the termination of our S Corporation status and the other related financial information set forth in this filing, which (unless otherwise specified) do not include any provision for U.S. federal income tax or the higher California state income tax rate, will not be comparable with our net income and EPS in periods after we commenced being taxed as a C Corporation. As a C Corporation, our net income is calculated by including a provision for U.S. federal income tax and a higher state income tax rate at a combined statutory rate of 29.11%.

Removed

The termination of our status as an S Corporation may also affect our financial condition and cash flows. Historically, we made quarterly cash distributions to our shareholders in amounts estimated by us to be sufficient for them to pay estimated individual U.S. federal and California state income tax liabilities resulting from our taxable income that was “passed through” to them. However, these distributions were not consistent, as sometimes the distributions were less than or in excess of the shareholders’ estimated U.S. federal and California state income tax liabilities resulting from their ownership of our stock. In addition, these estimates were based on individual income tax rates, which may differ from the rates imposed on the income of C Corporations. As a C Corporation, no income is “passed through” to any shareholders, but, as noted above, we commenced paying U.S. federal income tax and a higher California state income tax. However, in the event of an adjustment to our reported taxable income for periods prior to the termination of our S Corporation status, it is possible that our pre-IPO shareholders would be liable for additional income taxes for those prior periods. Pursuant to the Tax Sharing Agreement we entered into with such shareholders, upon our filing any tax return (amended or otherwise), in the event of any restatement of our taxable income or pursuant to a determination by, or a settlement with, a taxing authority, for any period during which we were an S Corporation, depending on the nature of the adjustment, we may be required to make a payment to such shareholders, who accepted distribution of the estimated balance of our federal AAA of $31.9 million under the Tax Sharing Agreement, in an amount equal to such shareholders’ incremental tax liability (including interest and penalties). In addition, the Tax Sharing Agreement provides that we will indemnify such shareholders with respect to unpaid income tax liabilities (including interest and penalties) to the extent that such unpaid income tax liabilities are attributable to an adjustment to our taxable income for any period after our S Corporation status terminated. The amounts that we have historically distributed to our shareholders may not be indicative of the amount of U.S. federal and California state income tax that we will be required to pay going forward. Depending on our effective tax rate and our future dividend rate, our future cash flows and financial condition could be positively or adversely affected compared to our historical cash flows and financial condition.

Removed

Furthermore, deferred tax assets and liabilities were recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of our existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of the change in tax rates resulting from becoming a C Corporation was recognized in net income in the year ended December 31, 2021.

Reworded

Pursuant to the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), as an emerging growth company, we can elect to opt out of the extended transition period for adopting any new or revised accounting standards. We have elected not to opt out of the extended transition period, which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public and private companies, we may adopt the standard on the application date for private companies. However, we may early adopt certain accounting standards, as the JOBS Act does not preclude an emerging growth company from adopting a new or revised accounting standard earlier than the time that such standard applies to private companies to the extent early adoption is permitted.

Reworded

A significant amount of the ACL is measured on a collective (pool) basis by loan and investment security type when similar risk characteristics exist. Pools are determined based primarily on regulatory reporting codes as the loans and investment securities within each pool share similar risk characteristics and there is sufficient historical peer loss data from the FFIEC to provide statistically meaningful support in the models developed. Reserves for credit losses identified on a pooled basis are then adjusted for qualitative and other environmental factors to reflect current conditions. The most significant components of qualitative and environmental factors used to estimate the allowance for credit losses are adjustments relating to prevailing economic conditions, concentrations within the loan portfolio, and external factors. These qualitative factors are subject to significant judgment and carry a higher degree of uncertainty. The prevailing economic conditions factor is estimated based on a range of potential economic conditions and is applied at both the portfolio and individual concentration level based on various factors. This estimate is subject to significant judgment and could potentially add $2.4$3.2 million based on existing loan balances, if not more,balances to the allowance for credit losses while using severely adverse economic conditions in the estimate. The concentrations within the loan portfolio factor is estimated based on concentrations at the loan pool level. This estimate is subject to significant judgment and could potentially add $9.4$12.0 million based on existing loan balances, if not more,balances to the allowance for credit losses while using a severely adverse market outlook for the specifically identified concentrations. The external factor is estimated based on current external factors, such as environmental factors, which could impact the loan portfolio. This estimate is subject to significant judgment and could potentially add $6.9$9.5 million based on existing loan balances, if not more,balances to the allowance for credit losses while using severely adverse external factors in the estimate. Other qualitative factors within the ACL relate to items which carry a lower degree of judgment using internally generated data. These factors include, but are not limited to, policy exception rates, volume of loan growth, and results of internal and external audits.

Removed

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, we refined our methodology of measuring the ACL on three pools of loans: Multifamily, C&I SBA, and CRE Non-Owner Occupied loans. Within the Multifamily pool, Manufactured Home Community (“MHC”) loans were segregated from traditional Multifamily as we identified a data source to provide sufficient historical peer loss data specific to MHC loans. This segregation now adjusts for differences in the risk characteristics and performance of MHCs compared to traditional Multifamily properties. Losses are estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis using individual probability of default and loss given default rates on a loan-by-loan basis. Applying this adjusted loss rate led to a decrease in the ACL for the MHC pool as of June 30, 2024 of approximately $5.8 million. During routine monitoring of charge-off activity within the C&I SBA pool, we identified an increased level of charge-offs during the first six months of 2024, reflecting a change in the credit quality of the pool. In response to this, we increased the expected loss rates to be more in line with net charge-off rates during the first six months of 2024, as this time period reflects what is expected based on our current economic outlook for loans in the C&I SBA pool. This adjustment reflects our estimate for future loss rates and increased the required reserves related to the C&I SBA pool by approximately $4.6 million as of June 30, 2024. Within the CRE Non-Owner Occupied portfolio, RV Park loans were segregated from traditional CRE Non-Owner Occupied as we identified a data source to provide sufficient historical peer loss data specific to RV Park loans. This segregation now adjusts for differences in the risk characteristics and performance of RV Park loans compared to traditional CRE Non-Owner Occupied properties. We used calculations of individual probability of default and loss given default on a loan-by-loan basis to derive an estimated loss rate. Applying this adjusted loss rate led to a decrease in the ACL for the RV Park pool of approximately $3.3 million as of September 30, 2024.

Reworded

•continue our organic lending growth in our market through our “purpose-driven and integrity-centered” approach to banking;

Reworded

•continue to focus on and growexpand eachour operations in our unique lines of the diverse industry clustersbusiness throughout our marketgeographic service areas;

Reworded

Net interest income increased by $8.8$32.2 million, or 7.96%,26.89%, for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, compared to the year ended December 31, 2023,2024, while our net interest margin decreasedincreased 1023 basis points during the same period. The increase in net interest income was primarily due to an increase in interest income driven by higher average balances and yields on loans, partially offset by an increase in interest expense due to higher average balances and rates onof deposits. Additional detail relating to net interest margin in each period is provided below.

Reworded

Net interest income during the year ended December 31, 20242025 increased $8.8$32.2 million, or 7.96%,26.89%, to $119.7$151.9 millionmillion, as compared to $110.9$119.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. Net interest margin totaled 3.32%3.55% for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, aan decreaseincrease of 1023 basis points compared to the prior year. The increase in net interest income is primarily attributable to an additional $30.6$35.9 million in loan interest income due to a $336.3$483.3 million, or 11.41%,14.72% increase in the average balance of loans and a 3719 basis point improvement in the average yield on loans as compared to the prior year. The increase in interest income was partially offset by an additional $24.5$10.0 million in deposit interest expense due to a $293.4$627.4 million, or 10.00%,19.45% increase in the average balance of deposits and a 58 basis point increase induring the year. The average cost of deposits was 2.40% for the year ended December 31, 2025, a decrease of 16 basis points compared to the prior year.year which helped to moderate the increase in interest expense related to deposits.

Reworded

We recorded a $7.0$9.7 million provision for credit losses in the year ended December 31, 2024,2025 compared to a $4.0$7.0 million provision for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The provision for credit losses increased $3.0$2.8 million, or 73.75%,39.57%, primarily due to increases in loan growth asand loanan originationsoverall increase in loss rates related to the yearannual CECL model refresh during the three months ended December 31, 20242025, wereas almostcompared double those forto the yearprior ended December 31, 2023.year.

Reworded

Non-interest income is a secondary contributor to our net income, following interest income. Non-interest income consists of service charges on deposit accounts, net gain on sale of securities, gain on sale of loans, loan-related fees, FHLB stock dividends, earnings on BOLI, and other income.

Removed

Service charges on deposit accounts. The increase resulted primarily from a $0.2 million increase in wire transfer fees recognized, partially offset by a small decrease in other fees recognized during the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023.

Removed

Net gain (loss) on sale of securities. The decrease in the net loss on sale of securities resulted from the sale of two municipal securities with a par value of approximately $0.8 million for a loss of approximately $0.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2023, with no sales occurring during the year ended December 31, 2024.

Reworded

Gain on sale of loans. The decrease related primarily to an overall decline in the volume of loans sold due to a strategic, intentional reduction in originations of loans held for sale during the second half of the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023.2025. During the year ended December 31, 2024, 56 SBA 7(a) loans with government guaranteed portions totaling2025, approximately $18.3$3.3 million of loans were sold with an effective yield of 6.96%,7.41%, as compared to approximately $36.5$18.3 million of loans sold with an effective yield of 5.35%6.96% during the year ended December 31, 2023.2024.

Reworded

Loan-related fees. The decreaseincrease was primarily a result of a $0.5 million increase in fees from swap referrals and a $0.2 million net decreaseincrease in income earned from the credit card program,activity, partially offset by a small$0.1 increasemillion decrease in loanfees feefrom incomeSBA earned7(a) on various loan types and services.loans.

Removed

FHLB stock dividends. The increase primarily relates to a 50 basis point increase in the annualized dividend rate earned year-over-year, while the average shares outstanding remained consistent.

Reworded

Other income. The decreaseincrease resultedrelated primarily fromto $0.5an millionoverall improvement in incomeearnings receivedrelated onto equity investments in venture-backed funds during the year ended December 31, 2024, as2025 compared to $1.7 million in income received on equity investments in venture-backed funds during the year ended December 31, 2023.2024.

Reworded

Over the past several years, we have investedcontinued to invest significant resources in personnel, technology, and infrastructure. As we execute initiatives based on growth, we expect non-interest expense to continue to grow. Non-interest expense has increased throughout the periods presented below; however, we expect our efficiency ratio will improve going forward due, in part, to our past investment in infrastructure.

Reworded

Salaries and employee benefits. The increase was the result of: (i) a $3.5$6.5 million increase in salaries, benefits, and bonuses,bonus of which approximately $3.3 millionexpense, related to employees hired to support expansion into the San13.66% Franciscoincrease Bayin Areaemployee headcount between December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2025; and (ii) a $1.4$1.2 million increase in commissions paid,expense primarilydue to employeeshigher inloan the San Francisco Bay Area.production. The increase was partially offset by a $0.3$1.5 million increase in deferred loan origination costs due to higher loan production, net of purchased consumer loans,production period-over-period.

Added

Occupancy and equipment. The increase was primarily due to higher rent and property management expenses for the Walnut Creek and San Francisco branch offices period-over-period.

Removed

Occupancy and equipment. The increase related to rent expense for the San Francisco branch office and a new office lease to support back office staff during the year ended December 31, 2024, which did not exist for the full year ended December 31, 2023.

Added

FDIC Insurance. The increase was primarily due to a $571.8 million increase in the assessment base period-over-period.

Added

Professional services. The increase was due to: (i) $0.1 million in fees paid for compensation consulting services that did not occur during 2024; (ii) a $0.2 million increase in expenses related to business development consulting services; (iii) a $0.1 million increase in legal expenses; and (iv) a $0.1 million increase in recruiter fees related to the 13.66% increase in employee headcount between December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2025.

Added

Advertising and promotional. The increase was primarily due to an additional $0.2 million in donations and $0.2 million related to sponsored events and partnerships, combined with $0.4 million of additional expenses incurred to support the expansion of the Bank’s business development teams, specifically related to client and prospective client development expenses.

Reworded

ProfessionalLoan-related services.expenses. The increase was due to an increase of $0.1 million in audit,inspection IT support,fees and otheran consultingincrease feesof for$0.1 servicesmillion providedin forloan-related thelegal yearexpenses, endedboth due to loan growth between December 31, 2024 compared to the year endedand December 31, 2023.2025.

Added

Other operating expenses. The increase was due to: (i) a $0.4 million increase in employee-related expenses, such as travel, conferences, training, and professional association memberships; (ii) a $0.2 million increase in armored car and courier expenses; (iii) a $0.2 million increase in administrative charges, including subscription services and bank charges; (iv) a $0.1 million increase in IntraFi Network fees resulting from an overall increase in balances carried in the network; (v) a $0.1 million increase in office expenses, such as check printing and supplies; and (vi) a $0.1 million increase in regulatory assessment fees.

Removed

Other operating expenses. The increase is primarily related to a $0.2 million increase in IntraFi Network fees resulting from an overall increase in balances carried in the network, partially offset by a $0.1 million decrease in conference and training expenses.

Added

On July 4, 2025, the President signed H.R. 1, the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” into law. The legislation includes several changes to federal tax law that generally allow for more favorable deductibility of certain business expenses beginning in 2025, including the restoration of immediate expensing of domestic R&D expenditures, reinstatement of 100% bonus depreciation, and more favorable rules for determining the limitation on business interest expense. The Act also made certain changes to the deductibility of the cost of meals and charitable contributions that are effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2025. These changes were not reflected in the income tax provision for the period ended December 31, 2025. The Company evaluated the impact on future periods and the legislation is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Added

Provision for income taxes increased by $3.1 million, or 16.15%, to $22.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to $19.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. This increase is primarily due to a 29.37% increase in pre-tax income recognized during the year ended December 31, 2025. This was partially offset by: (i) a $0.9 million benefit recorded during the quarter ended December 31, 2025 related to the purchase of transferable federal tax credits; and (ii) a net $0.2 million reduction to the provision recorded during the quarter ended June 30, 2025. This adjustment related to a tax law change for the state of California effective as of June 30, 2025, which requires a transition from a three-factor apportionment formula to a single-sales-factor formula for determining state income tax. As such, the Company recorded a net benefit of approximately $0.9 million relating to the current year provision, which was partially offset by a $0.7 million expense relating to the remeasuring of the deferred tax assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2025. The effective tax rate was 26.42% and 29.43% for the years ended December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively.

Removed

Provision for income taxes increased by $0.2 million, or 0.89%, to $19.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $18.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. This increase is due to a $0.6 million provision to return true-up recorded during the year ended December 31, 2024, partially offset by a decline in taxable income year-over-year. The effective tax rate was 29.43% and 28.34% for the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively.

Reworded

At December 31, 2024,2025, total assets were $4.1$4.8 billion, an increase of $460.2$701.6 million from $3.6$4.1 billion at December 31, 2023,2024, primarily due to a $451.0$542.2 million increase in total loans held for investment and a $30.8$154.5 million increase in cash and cash equivalents, partially offset by a $10.2 million decrease in investments.equivalents.

Added

Total cash and cash equivalents were $506.9 million at December 31, 2025, an increase of $154.5 million from $352.3 million at December 31, 2024. The increase in cash and cash equivalents was primarily due to the net increase in cash inflows from growth in total deposits of $643.1 million and cash outflows from growth in total loans held for investment of $542.2 million.

Removed

Total cash and cash equivalents were $352.3 million at December 31, 2024, an increase of $30.8 million from $321.6 million at December 31, 2023. The increase in cash and cash equivalents was primarily due to increases in deposits of $531.1 million, $80.9 million in net proceeds from the 2024 Public Offering (as defined below), and pre-tax income of $64.7 million, partially offset by loan originations, net of repayments, of $442.8 million and a decrease in borrowings of $170.0 million.

Reworded

Our investment portfolio is primarily comprised of U.S. government agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, and obligations of states and political subdivisions, which are high-quality liquid investments. We manage our investment portfolio according to written investment policies approved by our board of directors. Our investment strategy aimsis designed to maximize earnings while maintaining liquidity in securities with minimal credit risk and interest rate risk that is reflective of the yields obtained on those securities. Most of our securities are classified as available-for-sale, although we have one long-term, fixed rate municipal security classified as held-to-maturity.

Reworded

Our total securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity amounted to $96.9 million at December 31, 2025 and $100.9 million at December 31, 2024 and $111.2 million at December 31, 2023,2024, a decrease of $10.2$4.0 million year-over-year. The decrease was primarily due to principalmaturities, paydownsprepayments, and amortizationcalls of $9.0$9.3 million, partially offset by a purchase of a $1.0 million security and an improvement in the unrealized lossgain on securities of $0.9$5.1 million, with the remainder of the change due to amortization of premiums. For the year ended December 31, 2025, other comprehensive gain was $3.2 million, primarily indue our municipal securities portfolios. The improvement in the unrealized loss was recognized as a result of interestto rate decreaseschanges thatand occurredother market conditions on securities during the period.

Reworded

Weighted average yield for securities available-for-sale is the projected yield to maturity given current cash flow projections for U.S. government agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, and collateralized mortgage obligations. For callable municipal securities and corporate bonds, weighted average yield is a yield to worst. Weighted average yield for securities held-to-maturity is the stated coupon of the bond. Yields on tax-exempt securities are not presented on a tax-equivalent basis.

Removed

Table 11 sets forth the contractual maturities of our loan portfolio as of the dates shown.

Reworded

Table 1211 sets forth the contractual maturities and sensitivity to interest rate changes of our loan portfolio as of the dates shown.

Added

During 2025, the Company sold 10 SBA 7(a) loans with government-guaranteed portions totaling approximately $3.3 million. The decrease in sales from prior years is due to a strategic, intentional reduction in originations of loans held for sale. The Company received gross proceeds of $3.5 million on the loans sold in 2025, resulting in a net gain on sale of $0.2 million.

Removed

During 2023, the Company sold 143 SBA 7(a) loans with government-guaranteed portions totaling approximately $36.5 million. The Company received gross proceeds of $38.4 million on the loans sold in 2023, resulting in a net gain on sale of $2.0 million.

Reworded

The ratio of nonperforming loans to loans held for investment was 0.05%0.08% at December 31, 2024,2025, decreasingincreasing from 0.06%0.05% as of December 31, 2023.2024. The ratio of non-accrual loans to loans held for investment was also 0.08% at December 31, 2025, increasing from 0.05% as of December 31, 2024.

Reworded

The ratio of the allowance for credit losses to period end nonperforming loans increaseddecreased from 1,752.70% as of December 31, 2023 to 2,101.78% as of December 31, 2024.2024 to 1,434.40% as of December 31, 2025. This increasedecrease was due to: (i) a 9.76%72.19% increase in nonperforming loans year-over-year, partially offset by a 17.51% increase in the allowance for credit losses year-over-year;year-over-year. andThe (ii) an 8.50% decreaseincrease in nonperforming loans year-over-year.resulted mainly from the occurrence of two separate faith-based real estate loans entering nonperforming status.

Reworded

We utilize a risk grading system for our loans to aid us in evaluating the overall credit quality of our real estate loan portfolio and assessing the adequacy of our ACL.allowance for credit losses. All loans are grouped into a risk category at the time of origination. Commercial real estate loans over $2.0 million are reevaluated at least annually for proper classification in conjunction with our review of property and borrower financial information. All loans are reevaluated for proper risk grading as new information such as payment patterns, collateral condition, and other relevant information comes to our attention.

Reworded

TheLoans banking industry defines loans graded substandard or doubtfuldesignated as “classifiedwatch” loans.are internal bank designations and are not considered adversely classified. However, loans designated as “substandard” or “doubtful” are considered adversely classified. Table 1413 shows loans by credit quality risk rating as of the periods indicated.

Reworded

Loans designated as watch anddecreased substandard,from which$123.4 are not considered adversely classified, increasedmillion to $126.0$101.9 million atbetween December 31, 2024 from $41.6 million atand December 31, 2023.2025. The increase related primarily to an $83.8 million increase inConsequently, loans designated as watchsubstandard forincreased loansfrom which$2.6 havemillion indicatorsto $22.3 million between December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2025, primarily attributable to the downgrade of deficientone borrower experiencing financial difficulty with a special purpose commercial real estate loan quality and potentiala significantcommercial issuesline whichof are expected to be temporary in nature.credit. There were no loans with doubtful risk grades at December 31, 20242025 or December 31, 2023.2024.

Reworded

The allowance for credit losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based on management’s periodic review of the collectability of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral, and prevailing economic conditions. Historical loss rates within the commercial secured pool are also evaluated by management on a regular basis to estimate the allowance for credit losses. This evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

Reworded

At December 31, 2024,2025, the Company’s allowance for credit losses was $37.8$44.4 million,million compared to $34.4$37.8 million at December 31, 2023.2024. The $3.4$6.6 million increase in the allowance is due to a $7.5$9.8 million provision for credit losses, partially offset by net charge-offs of $4.1$3.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, mainly attributable to commercial and industrial loans, during the same period.

Reworded

While the entire allowance for credit losses is available to absorb losses from any and all loans, Table 1514 represents management’s allocation of our allowance for credit losses by loan category, the allocation of our allowance for credit losses as a percent of the total allowance for credit losses, and the balance of loans in each category as a percentage of total loans, for the periods indicated.

Reworded

The allowance for credit losses to loans held for investment decreasedincreased from 1.12% as of December 31, 2023 to 1.07% as of December 31, 2024.2024 to 1.09% as of December 31, 2025. Net charge-offs as a percent of average loans held for investment increaseddecreased from 0.11%0.12% to 0.12%0.08% for the years ended December 31, 20232024 and December 31, 2024,2025, respectively.

Reworded

During 2024,2025, total liabilities increased by $349.3$652.4 million from $3.3 billion at December 31, 2023 to $3.7 billion at December 31, 2024.2024 to $4.3 billion at December 31, 2025. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in deposits of $531.1 million, partially offset by a decrease in other borrowings of $170.0$643.1 million. The $531.1$643.1 million increase in deposits was largely due to increases in money market, time,non-interest-bearing demand, interest-bearing transaction, and non-interest-bearing demandsavings deposits of $242.9$553.3 million, $203.6$161.9 million, $29.0 million, and $91.5$14.5 million, respectively,respectively. These increases were partially offset by decreases in interest-bearing transaction and savingstime deposits of $5.1$115.5 million, largely driven by a $95.0 million anddecrease $1.8in million,wholesale respectively.deposits.

Reworded

Total deposits increased by $531.1$643.1 million, or 17.55%,18.07%, to $3.6$4.2 billion at December 31, 20242025 from $3.0$3.6 billion as of December 31, 2023.2024. Deposit increases were primarily attributable to an increase in the number of new relationships, as well as normal fluctuations in our existing accounts. Non-interest-bearing deposits increased by $91.5$161.9 million in 20242025 to $922.6$1.1 million,billion, and represented 25.82% of total deposits at December 31, 2025, compared to 25.93% of total deposits at December 31, 2024, compared to 27.46% of total deposits at December 31, 2023.2024. Our loan to deposit ratio was 97.00% at December 31, 2025, compared to 99.38% at December 31, 2024, compared to 102.19% at December 31, 2023.2024. We closely monitor the loan to deposit ratio for purposes of both operational objectives and regulatory capital compliance. We intend to continue to operate our business with close monitoring of the loan to deposit ratio.

Reworded

Our largest single deposit relationship at December 31, 20242025 related to brokereda deposits.government agency. The balance for this customer was $300.0$290.0 million, or approximately 6.90% of total deposits as of December 31, 2025. At December 31, 2024, our largest single deposit relationship related to brokered deposits and had a balance of $300.0 million, or 8.43% of total deposits as of December 31, 2024. At December 31, 2023, our largest single deposit relationship related to a government agency and had a balance of $260.0 million, or 8.59% of total deposits as of December 31, 2023. As our demand deposits fluctuate, we have purchased brokered deposits as needed to supplement liquidity. We do not consider brokered deposits as core deposits, but as another deposit funding source for our loan growth.

Reworded

From time to time, we utilize short-term collateralized FHLB borrowings to maintain adequate liquidity. There were no borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 20242025 and borrowings of $170.0 million outstanding from the FHLB as of December 31, 2023.2024, respectively.

Reworded

Shareholders’ equity totaled $445.8 million at December 31, 2025 and $396.6 million at December 31, 2024 and $285.8 million at December 31, 2023.2024. The increase in shareholders’ equity was primarily a result of $80.9 million of additional common stock issued and outstanding in 2024 and net income recognized of $45.7$61.6 million, partially offset by $16.2$17.1 million in cash dividends paid during the period.

Reworded

Our liquidity position is supported by management of our liquid assets and liabilities and access to alternative sources of funds. Our liquidity requirements are met primarily through our deposits, Federal Reserve Discount Window advances, FHLB advances, and the principal and interest payments we receive on loans and investment securities. Cash on hand, cash at third-party banks, investments available-for-sale, and maturing or prepaying balances in our investment and loan portfolios are our most liquid assets. Other sources of liquidity that are routinely available to us include funds from retail and wholesale deposits, advances from the FHLB and the Federal Reserve Discount Window, and proceeds from the sale of loans. Less commonly used sources of funding include borrowings from established federal funds lines from unaffiliated commercial banks, and the issuance of debt or equity securities. We believe we have ample liquidity resources to fund future growth and meet other cash needs as necessary.

Showing the first 60 of 71 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-08-06 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-05-07 (period ending 2026-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

0new paragraphs
0removed paragraphs
0reworded paragraphs
31 → 31words in section

The section in the latest 10-Q reads in full:

There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed under Item 1A of the Company’s 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K, previously filed with the SEC.

No wording changes found in this section.

Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

32new paragraphs
1removed paragraphs
71reworded paragraphs
11,411 → 13,759words in section

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Reworded topics: downgrade

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

•Credit Quality. Credit quality remains strong, with non-accrual loans representing $2.8$13.4 million, or 0.07%0.30% of total loans held for investment at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to $3.1 million, or 0.08% of total loans held for investment at December 31, 2025. This increase was due to a $10.3 million, or 331.20% increase in nonperforming loans due to one Community Reinvestment Act loan that was placed on non-accrual status during the period. The balance of the loan is $11.4 million as of June 30, 2026, and it was originally downgraded to substandard in 2025. This was partially offset by improvements across the remainder of the nonperforming loan portfolio. The ratio of the allowance for credit losses to total loans held for investment was 1.10%1.05% at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 1.09% at December 31, 2025.
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: downgrade

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

The ratio of the allowance for credit losses to period end nonperforming loans increaseddecreased from 1,434.40% as of December 31, 2025 to 1,649.11%354.57% as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026. This increasedecrease was due to a $2.0$10.3 million, or 4.57%,331.20%, increase in the allowance for credit losses, while nonperforming loans decreased by $0.3 million, or 9.04%, due to one Community Reinvestment Act loan that was placed on non-accrual status during the payoffperiod. The balance of onethe loan is $11.4 million as of June 30, 2026, and it was originally downgraded to substandard in 2025. This was partially offset by improvements across the remainder of the nonperforming loan and the sale of another.portfolio.
see in full comparison
New text topics: interest rate
“1Interest income/expense is divided by the actual number of days in the period multiplied by the actual number of days in the year to correspond to stated interest rate terms, where applicable.”
see in full comparison
New text
“As compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025, net interest income during the six months ended June 30, 2026 increased by $19.0 million, or 27.02%, to $89.5 million from $70.5 million. Net interest margin totaled 3.66% for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of 17 basis points compared to the same period of the prior year. The improvement was driven by balance sheet growth and a favorable shift in funding mix, which more than offset pressure from declining federal funds rates over the same period. …”
see in full comparison
New text
“The provision for income taxes was $13.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to $10.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was primarily due to an overall increase in taxable income period-over-period. This increase was partially offset by a $0.5 million benefit recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2026 related to the purchase of transferable tax credits that did not occur during the six months ended June 30, 2025, as well as a net $0.2 million reduction to the provision recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2025. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

As compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, net interest income during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 increased by $9.5$9.6 million, or 27.90%,26.20%, to $43.5$46.1 million from $34.0$36.5 million. Net interest margin totaled 3.70%3.63% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, an increase of 2510 basis points compared to the same quarter of the prior year. The improvement was driven by balance sheet growth and a favorable shift in funding mix, which more than offset pressure from declining federal funds rates over the same period. The increase in net interest income is primarily attributable to an additional $10.3$11.7 million increase in interest income, mainly due to a $582.5$636.7 million, or 16.32%,17.25%, increase in the average balance of loans and a five$315.3 basismillion, pointor improvement87.13%, increase in the average yieldbalance onof loansinterest-earning duringdeposits thein threebanks months(deposits endedplaced Marchwith 31,other 2026,financial as comparedinstitutions to theearn sameinterest). quarter of the prior year. TheThis increase in interest income was partially offset by a $0.8$2.2 million increase in interest expenseexpense, duestemming tofrom a $734.4$914.3 million, or 20.48%,24.47%, increase in the average balance of deposits during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.2026, Themoderated by a 30 basis point decrease in average cost of deposits during the three months ended March 31, 2026 was 2.13%, a decrease of 35 basis points compared to the same quarter of the prior year,year. whichFurther helped to moderatesupporting the increasedecreasing inaverage interestcost expenseof related to deposits. In addition,deposits, the average balance of non-interest-bearing deposits increased by $211.1$207.0 million, or 23.17%,21.62%, compared to the same period of the prior year.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (104)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 13 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements represent plans, estimates, objectives, goals, guidelines, expectations, intentions, projections, and statements of our beliefs concerning future events, business plans, objectives, expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate, or imply future results, performance, or achievements, and are typically identified with words such as “may,” “could,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “aim,” “intend,” “plan,” or words or phasesphrases of similar meaning. To the extent that this discussion describes prior performance, the descriptions relate only to the periods listed, which may not be indicative of our future financial outcomes. We caution that the forward-looking statements are based largely on our expectations and are subject to a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties that are subject to change based on factors which are, in many instances, beyond our control. Such forward-looking statements are based on various assumptions (some of which may be beyond our control) and are subject to risks and uncertainties, which change over time, and other factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those currently anticipated. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:

Reworded

•our ability to implement, maintain, and improve an effective risk management framework, disclosure controls and procedures, and internal controls over financial reporting;

Reworded

The foregoing factors could cause results or performance to materially differ from those expressed in our forward-looking statements, should not be considered exhaustive, and should be read together with other cautionary statements that are included in this report and those discussed in the section entitled “Risk Factors” of our 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K10-K, our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2026, and other filings we may make with the SEC, copies of which are available from us at no charge. New risks and uncertainties may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict their occurrence or how they will affect us. If one or more of the factors affecting our forward-looking information and statements proves incorrect, then our actual results, performance, or achievements could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, forward-looking information and statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Therefore, we caution you not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking information and statements. We disclaim any duty to revise or update the forward-looking statements, whether written or oral, to reflect actual results or changes in the factors affecting the forward-looking statements, except as specifically required by law.

Reworded

Headquartered in the greater Sacramento metropolitan area of California, Five Star Bancorp is a bank holding company that operates through its wholly owned subsidiary, Five Star Bank, a California state-chartered non-member bank. We provide a broad range of banking products and services to small and medium-sized businesses, professionals, and individuals primarily in Northern California through nine branch offices.offices, with a tenth branch opening in Lodi in July 2026. Our mission is to strive to become the top business bank in all markets we serve through exceptional service, deep connectivity, and customer empathy. We are dedicated to serving real estate, agricultural, faith-based, and small to medium-sized enterprises. We aim to consistently deliver value that meets or exceeds the expectations of our shareholders, customers, employees, business partners, and community. We refer to our mission as “purpose-driven and integrity-centered banking.” At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had total assets of $5.0$5.4 billion, total loans held for investment of $4.2$4.5 billion, and total deposits of $4.5$4.8 billion.

Reworded

The allowance for credit losses represents the estimated expected credit losses in our loan and investment portfolios and is estimated as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 using Current Expected Credit Loss (“CECL”). The allowance for credit losses is established through a provision for credit losses charged to operations. Loans and investments are charged against the allowance for credit losses when management believes that the collectability of the principal is unlikely. Subsequent recoveries of previously charged-off amounts, if any, are credited to the allowance for credit losses.

Reworded

Net income for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 totaled $18.6$19.4 million and $38.0 million, respectively, as compared to net income of $13.1$14.5 million and $27.6 million for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.2025, respectively.

Reworded

•Deposits. Total deposits increased by $268.3$598.3 million, or 6.39%,14.24%, from $4.2 billion at December 31, 2025 to $4.5$4.8 billion at MarchJune 31,30, 2026. Non-wholesale deposits increased by $350.2$813.3 million in the first threesix months of 2026 to $4.1$4.5 billion at MarchJune 31,30, 2026. Wholesale deposits, which the Company defines as brokered deposits and California Time Deposit Program deposits, decreased by $81.9$215.0 million in the first threesix months of 2026 to $383.1$250.0 million. Non-interest-bearing deposits increased by $148.2$89.9 million in the first threesix months of 2026 to $1.2 billion, and represented 27.58%24.47% of total deposits at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to 25.82% of total deposits at December 31, 2025. Our loan to deposit ratio was 94.27%94.17% at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to 97.00% at December 31, 2025.

Reworded

•Assets. Total assets were $5.0$5.4 billion at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, representing a $276.9$622.2 million, or 5.82%,13.09%, increase compared to $4.8 billion at December 31, 2025.

Reworded

•Loans. Total loans held for investment were $4.2$4.5 billion at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to $4.1 billion at December 31, 2025, an increase of $138.5$444.8 million, or 3.40%.10.91%. The increase was a result of $389.0$1.0 millionbillion in loan originations and advances, partially offset by $67.9$162.1 million and $182.6$421.9 million in loan payoffs and paydowns, respectively.

Reworded

•Credit Quality. Credit quality remains strong, with non-accrual loans representing $2.8$13.4 million, or 0.07%0.30% of total loans held for investment at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to $3.1 million, or 0.08% of total loans held for investment at December 31, 2025. This increase was due to a $10.3 million, or 331.20% increase in nonperforming loans due to one Community Reinvestment Act loan that was placed on non-accrual status during the period. The balance of the loan is $11.4 million as of June 30, 2026, and it was originally downgraded to substandard in 2025. This was partially offset by improvements across the remainder of the nonperforming loan portfolio. The ratio of the allowance for credit losses to total loans held for investment was 1.10%1.05% at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 1.09% at December 31, 2025.

Reworded

•Net Interest Margin. Net interest margin was 3.70%3.63% and 3.66%, respectively, for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, and 3.45%3.53% and 3.49%, respectively, for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The increase in net interest margin for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 is primarilydriven dueby tobalance an increase in interest income related to loansheet growth and ana improvementfavorable shift in thefunding averagemix, yieldwhich onmore loans, partiallythan offset bypressure anfrom increasedeclining infederal interestfunds expenserates drivenover bythe deposit growth.periods.

Reworded

•Efficiency Ratio. Efficiency ratio was 38.57%40.91% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, down from 42.58%41.03% for the corresponding period of 2025, mainly due to a $9.5$9.6 million, or 27.90%,26.20%, increase in net interest income during the same period.period, partially offset by a $3.9 million, or 24.74%, increase in non-interest expense. Additionally, efficiency ratio was 39.77% for the six months ended June 30, 2026, down from 41.77% for the corresponding period of 2025, mainly due to a $19.0 million, or 27.02%, increase in net interest income.

Reworded

•Capital Ratios. All capital ratios were above well-capitalized regulatory thresholds as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026. The total risk-based capital ratio for the Company was 13.17%12.50% at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to 13.33% at December 31, 2025. The Tier 1 leverage ratio was 9.56%9.21% at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to 9.70% at December 31, 2025. For additional information about the regulatory capital requirements applicable to the Company and the Bank, see the section entitled “—Financial Condition Summary—Capital Adequacy” below.

Reworded

•Dividends. The board of directors declared a cash dividend of $0.25 per share on JanuaryApril 15,16, 2026.

Reworded

The following discussion of our results of operations compares the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 to the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The results of operations for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2026.

Reworded

Net interest income increased by $9.5$9.6 million, or 27.90%,26.20%, for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, and our net interest margin increased by 2510 basis points during the same period. The increase in net interest income is primarily attributabledue to an increase in interest income driven by loan growth and anhigher improvementinterest-earning deposits in the average yield on loans,banks, partially offset by an increase in interest expense driven by deposit growth.growth, though moderated by a decrease in the average cost of deposits. Additional detail relating to net interest margin in each period is provided below.

Reworded

As compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, net interest income during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 increased by $9.5$9.6 million, or 27.90%,26.20%, to $43.5$46.1 million from $34.0$36.5 million. Net interest margin totaled 3.70%3.63% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, an increase of 2510 basis points compared to the same quarter of the prior year. The improvement was driven by balance sheet growth and a favorable shift in funding mix, which more than offset pressure from declining federal funds rates over the same period. The increase in net interest income is primarily attributable to an additional $10.3$11.7 million increase in interest income, mainly due to a $582.5$636.7 million, or 16.32%,17.25%, increase in the average balance of loans and a five$315.3 basismillion, pointor improvement87.13%, increase in the average yieldbalance onof loansinterest-earning duringdeposits thein threebanks months(deposits endedplaced Marchwith 31,other 2026,financial as comparedinstitutions to theearn sameinterest). quarter of the prior year. TheThis increase in interest income was partially offset by a $0.8$2.2 million increase in interest expenseexpense, duestemming tofrom a $734.4$914.3 million, or 20.48%,24.47%, increase in the average balance of deposits during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.2026, Themoderated by a 30 basis point decrease in average cost of deposits during the three months ended March 31, 2026 was 2.13%, a decrease of 35 basis points compared to the same quarter of the prior year,year. whichFurther helped to moderatesupporting the increasedecreasing inaverage interestcost expenseof related to deposits. In addition,deposits, the average balance of non-interest-bearing deposits increased by $211.1$207.0 million, or 23.17%,21.62%, compared to the same period of the prior year.

Added

Net interest income increased by $19.0 million, or 27.02%, for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025, and our net interest margin increased by 17 basis points when compared to the same period in 2025. The increase in net interest income is primarily attributable to an increase in interest income driven by loan growth, partially offset by an increase in interest expense driven by deposit growth. Additional detail relating to net interest margin in each period is provided below.

Added

Average balance sheet, interest, and yield/rate analysis. Table 5 presents average balance sheet information, interest income, interest expense, and the corresponding average yield earned or rate paid for each period reported. The average balances are daily averages and include both performing and nonperforming loans.

Added

1Interest income/expense is divided by the actual number of days in the period multiplied by the actual number of days in the year to correspond to stated interest rate terms, where applicable.

Added

2Yields on available-for-sale securities are calculated based on fair value. Investment security interest is earned monthly on a 30/360 day basis. Yields are not calculated on a tax-equivalent basis.

Added

3Non-accrual loans are included in total loan balances. No adjustment has been made for these loans in the yield calculations. Interest income on loans includes amortization of deferred loan fees, net of deferred loan costs. Allowance for credit losses is not included in total loan balances.

Added

4Allowance for credit losses is included in interest receivable and other assets, net.

Added

5Net interest spread represents the average yield earned on interest-earning assets minus the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.

Added

6Net interest margin is computed by calculating the difference between interest income and interest expense, divided by the average balance of interest-earning assets, then annualized based on the number of days in the given period.

Added

Analysis of changes in interest income and expenses. Increases and decreases in interest income and interest expense result from changes in average balances (volume) of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as changes in average yields/rates. Table 6 shows the effect that these factors had on the interest earned from our interest-earning assets and interest incurred on our interest-bearing liabilities. The effect of changes in volume is determined by multiplying the change in volume by the current period’s average yield/rate. The effect of rate changes is calculated by multiplying the change in average yield/rate by the previous period’s volume. Changes not solely attributable to volume or yields/rates have been allocated in proportion to the respective volume and yield/rate components.

Added

As compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025, net interest income during the six months ended June 30, 2026 increased by $19.0 million, or 27.02%, to $89.5 million from $70.5 million. Net interest margin totaled 3.66% for the six months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of 17 basis points compared to the same period of the prior year. The improvement was driven by balance sheet growth and a favorable shift in funding mix, which more than offset pressure from declining federal funds rates over the same period. The increase in net interest income is primarily attributable to a $22.0 million increase in interest income, mainly due to a $609.7 million, or 16.80%, increase in the average balance of loans and a $249.9 million, or 72.36%, increase in the average balance of interest-earning deposits in banks. This increase in interest income was partially offset by a $3.0 million increase in interest expense, stemming from a $615.9 million, or 22.58%, increase in the average balance of interest-bearing deposits during the six months ended June 30, 2026, moderated by a 44 basis point decrease in the cost of interest-bearing deposits compared to the same period of the prior year. Further supporting the decreasing average cost of funds, the average balance of non-interest-bearing deposits increased by $209.0 million, or 22.38%, compared to the same period of the prior year.

Reworded

We recorded a $2.7$2.3 million provision for credit losses in the firstsecond quarter of 2026, compared to a $1.9$2.5 million provision for credit losses for the same period of 2025. The increasedecrease in the provision for credit losses in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 is mainly due to increaseslower innet loan growth and an overall increase in loss ratescharge-offs in the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.

Added

We recorded a $4.9 million provision for credit losses in the first six months of 2026, as compared to a $4.4 million provision for credit losses for the same period of 2025. The increase in the provision for credit losses recorded during the first six months of 2026 is mainly due to increases in loan growth and an overall increase in loss rates, partially offset by lower charge-offs.

Reworded

Gain on sale of loans. The decrease related to an overall decline in the volume of SBA loans sold due to a strategic, intentional reduction in originations of loans held for sale. During the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, no SBA loans were sold, as compared to approximately $1.7$1.6 million of SBA loans sold with an effective yield of 7.24%7.60% during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.

Reworded

Loan-related fees. The increase resulted primarily from an increase of $0.8$0.1 million in loan referral income, combined with an increase of $0.1 million in fees from swap referrals during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.

Reworded

FHLB stock dividends. The increasedecrease related primarily to the FHLB’s transition to a $0.4 million special cashtier-based dividend fromstructure, which lowered the FHLBBank’s duringeffective thedividend threerate months ended March 31, 2026 that did not occur during the three months ended March 31, 2025.received.

Reworded

Other income.Other. The decreaseincrease related primarily to an overall lossimprovement in earnings related to investments in venture-backed funds during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.

Added

Table 8 details the components of non-interest income for the periods indicated.

Added

Service charges on deposit accounts. The decrease related primarily to a $0.2 million decrease in service charges assessed on analyzed deposit accounts.

Added

Gain on sale of loans. The decrease related primarily to an overall decline in the volume of SBA loans sold due to a strategic, intentional reduction in originations of loans held for sale. During the six months ended June 30, 2026, no SBA loans were sold, as compared to approximately $3.3 million of SBA loans sold with an effective yield of 7.41% during the six months ended June 30, 2025.

Added

Loan-related fees. The increase related primarily to a $0.9 million increase in fees from swap referrals and a $0.1 million increase in loan referral income.

Added

FHLB stock dividends. The increase related primarily to a $0.4 million special cash dividend from the FHLB during the six months ended June 30, 2026, partially offset by a decrease in dividends related to the FHLB’s transition to a tier-based dividend structure, which lowered the Bank’s effective dividend rate received.

Added

Earnings on BOLI. The increase related primarily to an increase in BOLI balances between June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2026 due to the addition of a new policy.

Added

Other. The decrease related primarily to an overall loss in earnings related to equity investments in venture-backed funds during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025.

Reworded

Salaries and employee benefits. The increase related primarily to: (i) a $2.3$2.8 million increase in salaries, benefits, and bonus expense, mainly related to a 17.48%13.30% increase in headcount between MarchJune 31,30, 2025 and MarchJune 31,30, 2026; and (ii) a $0.5$0.7 million increase in commissions paid.primarily due to higher loan originations period-over-period. This increase was partially offset by a $0.6$0.9 million increase in deferred loan origination costs due to higher loan productionoriginations period-over-period.

Reworded

Occupancy and equipment. The increase was primarily due to expenses for the Walnut Creek branch office and Newport Beach non-depository office during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, which did not exist for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.

Added

Data processing and software. The increase was primarily due to: (i) increased usage of our digital banking platform; (ii) higher transaction volumes related to the increased number of loan and deposit accounts; and (iii) an increased number of licenses required for new users on our loan origination and documentation system.

Added

FDIC insurance. The increase was primarily due to a $916.2 million increase in the assessment base period-over-period.

Added

Loan-related expenses. The decrease related primarily to lower inspection and legal expenses. Although loan originations were higher period-over-period, a greater mix of purchased loans and large credit relationships reduced per-unit inspection costs, and inspection activity was delayed relative to the prior period.

Added

Other operating expenses. The increase related primarily to: (i) a $0.3 million increase in employee-related expenses such as travel and professional association memberships; (ii) a $0.2 million increase in bank charges; (iii) a $0.1 million increase in operational losses; (iv) a $0.1 million increase in IntraFi Network fees resulting from an overall increase in balances carried in the network; and (v) a $0.1 million increase in armored car and courier services.

Added

Table 10 details the components of non-interest expense for the periods indicated.

Added

Salaries and employee benefits. The increase was primarily a result of: (i) a $5.1 million increase in salaries, benefits, and bonus expense, mainly related to a 13.30% increase in headcount between June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2026; and (ii) a $1.2 million increase in commissions primarily due to higher loan originations period-over-period. This increase was partially offset by a $1.5 million increase in deferred loan origination costs due to greater loan originations period-over-period.

Added

Occupancy and equipment. The increase was primarily due to expenses for the Walnut Creek branch office and Newport Beach non-depository office during the six months ended June 30, 2026, which did not exist for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was also related to an increase in expense for the San Francisco branch office due to an expansion project.

Added

Data processing and software. The increase was primarily due to: (i) increased usage of our digital banking platform; (ii) higher transaction volumes related to the increased number of loan and deposit accounts; and (iii) an increased number of licenses required for new users on our loan origination and documentation system.

Added

FDIC insurance. The increase was primarily due to a $916.2 million increase in the assessment base period-over-period.

Reworded

Advertising and promotional. The increase relatedwas primarily due to additional expenses incurred to support the expansion of the Bank’s business development teams, including $0.1$0.2 million related to business development expenses and $0.1 million related to donation, sponsorship,advertising and advertisingmarketing expenses.

Added

Loan-related expenses. The decrease was primarily related to a $0.1 million decrease in loan legal fees, combined with individually immaterial decreases in other expenses including credit report costs, inspection costs, and environmental report costs.

Added

Other operating expenses. The increase was primarily due to: (i) a $0.5 million increase in employee-related expenses such as travel; (ii) a $0.3 million increase in administrative charges, including bank charges; (iii) a $0.2 million increase in IntraFi Network fees resulting from an overall increase in balances carried in the network; (iv) a $0.2 million increase in armored car and courier services; and (v) a $0.1 million increase in operational losses, partially offset by the release of a $1.0 million loss contingency on an SBA loan during the six months ended June 30, 2026. No such release occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2025.

Removed

Other operating expenses. The decrease related primarily to the release of a $1.0 million loss contingency on an SBA loan during the three months ended March 31, 2026. No such release occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2025. This was partially offset by individually immaterial increases in expenses related to operations, including administration, courier service, and travel.

Reworded

The provision for income taxes was $6.4$6.7 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, a $1.1 million increase from the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. This increase was primarily driven by an increase in taxable income, partially offset by a $0.2 million benefit recorded during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 related to the purchase of transferable tax credits that did not occur during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The effective tax rates were 25.61%25.64% and 28.71%27.82% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and MarchJune 31,30, 2025, respectively.

Added

The provision for income taxes was $13.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to $10.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was primarily due to an overall increase in taxable income period-over-period. This increase was partially offset by a $0.5 million benefit recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2026 related to the purchase of transferable tax credits that did not occur during the six months ended June 30, 2025, as well as a net $0.2 million reduction to the provision recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2025. This adjustment related to a tax law change for the state of California effective as of June 30, 2025, which required a transition from a three-factor apportionment formula to a single-sales-factor formula for determining state income tax. As such, the Company recorded a net benefit of approximately $0.9 million relating to the current year provision, which was partially offset by a $0.7 million expense relating to the remeasurement of the deferred tax assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2025. No such adjustment was recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2026. The effective tax rates for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 were 25.63% and 28.24%, respectively.

Reworded

The following discussion compares our financial condition as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 to our financial condition as of December 31, 2025. Table 711 summarizes selected components of our unaudited consolidated balance sheets as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025.

Reworded

At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, total assets were $5.0$5.4 billion, an increase of $276.9$622.2 million from $4.8 billion at December 31, 2025. The increase was primarily comprised of a $138.5$444.8 million increase in total loans held for investment and a $137.5$178.2 million increase in cash and cash equivalents. The $138.5$444.8 million increase in total loans held for investment between December 31, 2025 and MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was a result of $389.0$1.0 millionbillion in loan originations and advances, partially offset by $67.9$162.1 million and $182.6$421.9 million in loan payoffs and paydowns, respectively. The $444.8 million increase in total loans held for investment included $145.0 million in purchased loans within the consumer section of the loan portfolio.

Reworded

Total cash and cash equivalents were $644.4$685.1 million at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, an increase of $137.5$178.2 million from $506.9 million at December 31, 2025. The increase in cash and cash equivalents was primarily due to the net increase in cash inflows from growth in total deposits of $268.3$598.3 million and cash outflows from growth in total loans held for investment of $138.5$444.8 million.

Showing the first 60 of 104 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

FSBC insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 6 Form 4 filings (6 insiders, 1 trade date, 142,727 shares, about $6.3M) and open-market sales in 6 filings (4 insiders, 6 trade dates, 13,559 shares, about $560.4K). Net open-market shares: 129,168 (purchases minus sales); net value about $5.7M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2026-08-04Allbaugh Larry Eugene
Director, 10% owner
Gift 50,000— —210,695 SEC
2026-07-22Allbaugh Larry Eugene
Director, 10% owner
Open-market purchase 5,682$44.00 $250.0K507,401 SEC
2026-07-22Allbaugh Larry Eugene
Director, 10% owner
Open-market purchase 90,909$44.00 $4.0M1,101,687 SEC
2026-07-22Perry-Smith Robert Truxtun
Director
Open-market purchase 31,363$44.00 $1.4M258,898 SEC
2026-07-22Deary-Bell Shannon
Director
Open-market purchase 5,682$44.00 $250.0K85,244 SEC
2026-07-22Lucas Donna
Director
Open-market purchase 1,136$44.00 $50.0K14,254 SEC
2026-07-22Riggs Judson Teichert
Director
Open-market purchase 2,273$44.00 $100.0K87,531 SEC
2026-07-22Ramos Kevin Francis
Director
Open-market purchase 5,682$44.00 $250.0K177,546 SEC
2026-05-29Allbaugh Larry Eugene
Director, 10% owner
Gift 150,000— —260,695 SEC
2026-05-26Wait Brett Levi
SVP, Chief Information Officer
Open-market sale 1,640$42.27 $69.3K16,873 SEC
2026-05-21Wetton Shelley Ronan
SVP, Chief Marketing Officer
Grant/award 905— —24,711 SEC
2026-05-21Wait Brett Levi
SVP, Chief Information Officer
Grant/award 905— —18,513 SEC
2026-05-21Rizzo Michael Anthony
EVP, Chief Banking Officer
Grant/award 2,715— —36,084 SEC
2026-05-21Ramirez-Medina Lydia Ann
EVP, Chief Operating Officer
Grant/award 2,715— —13,675 SEC
2026-05-21Luck Heather Christina
EVP, Chief Financial Officer
Grant/award 2,715— —30,376 SEC
2026-05-21Lee Michael Eugene
SVP, Chief Regulatory Officer
Open-market sale 867$41.23 $35.7K32,764 SEC
2026-05-21Lee Michael Eugene
SVP, Chief Regulatory Officer
Grant/award 905— —33,669 SEC
2026-05-21Kurtze Don Justin
EVP, SF Bay Area President
Grant/award 2,715— —7,362 SEC
2026-05-21Dalton John William
SVP, Chief Credit Officer
Grant/award 905— —32,662 SEC
2026-05-20Beckwith James Eugene
Director, President & CEO
Open-market sale 2,000$41.12 $82.2K471,014 SEC
2026-05-20Beckwith James Eugene
Director, President & CEO
Open-market sale 2,000$41.22 $82.4K469,014 SEC
2026-05-20Beckwith James Eugene
Director, President & CEO
Open-market sale 2,428$41.34 $100.4K466,586 SEC
2026-05-14Wait Brett Levi
SVP & CIO
Open-market sale 2,583$41.11 $106.2K17,608 SEC
2026-05-07Lee Michael Eugene
SVP & Chief Regulatory Officer
Open-market sale 1,641$41.26 $67.7K33,631 SEC
2026-05-06Ramirez-Medina Lydia Ann
EVP & Chief Operating Officer
Open-market sale 400$40.99 $16.4K10,960 SEC
2025-05-09Deary-Bell Shannon
Director
Inheritance 3,900— —0 SEC

Well-known investors holding FSBC (13F)

InvestorQuarterSharesReported value% of their 13FChange vs prior quarter
AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) COM2026-06-3051,305$2.5M0.0%Added 21%
Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) COM2026-06-3021,333$1.0M0.0%New position
Millennium Management (Israel Englander) COM2026-06-3025,071$945.7K—Sold out
D. E. Shaw & Co. COM2026-06-3016,892$822.5K0.0%Added 3%
Renaissance Technologies COM2026-06-3013,300$647.6K0.0%Reduced 55%
Two Sigma Investments COM2026-06-308,643$420.8K0.0%Reduced 64%

13F reports are filed up to 45 days after quarter end and show long U.S. equity positions only; options positions are omitted here.

Coming soon: email alerts when FSBC files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.