Companies › FSBW

FSBW 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

FS Bancorp, Inc. · Nasdaq · Savings Institutions, Not Federally Chartered · CIK 1530249 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from FS Bancorp, Inc.'s public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

8 / 5risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
1new risk-factor headings
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
3Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-03-13 (period ending 2025-12-31) with 10-K filed 2025-03-17 (period ending 2024-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

8new paragraphs
5removed paragraphs
22reworded paragraphs
9,703 → 9,443words in section

New heading “Severe flooding in Western Washington and Oregon in November 2025, as well as the increasing frequency and severity of flood and wildfire events, could materially and adversely affect the credit quality of our loan portfolio and the adequacy of our allowance for credit losses.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: tariff, china, supply chain, inflation
“Broader macroeconomic factors may also adversely affect our performance. Although inflation has moderated, higher input costs and persistent wage pressures continue to affect many borrowers, while the Federal Reserve's interest rate reductions in late 2025 have resulted in increased margin compression and reduced yields on adjustable- and variable-rate loans. Additionally, slowing economic activity, shifting consumer sentiment, and higher levels of household debt may negatively affect credit performance in our consumer and commercial portfolios. Trade disputes, tariffs, U.S. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: tariff, inflation, interest rate
“Our financial condition and results of operations are affected by credit policies of monetary authorities, particularly the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, or the Federal Reserve. Actions by monetary and fiscal authorities, including the Federal Reserve, could lead to inflation, deflation, or other economic phenomena that could adversely affect our financial performance. Higher U.S. tariffs on imported goods could exacerbate inflationary pressures by increasing the cost of goods and materials for businesses and consumers. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: default, climate
“The ongoing Los Angeles wildfires that began in January 2025 present heightened risks to our loan portfolio and the adequacy of our allowance for credit losses. Borrowers impacted by the fires may face financial hardship, leading to increased loan defaults and reduced repayment capacity. Damage to or destruction of properties securing loans may result in collateral value depreciation, further increasing potential losses. Additionally, inadequate insurance coverage or denied claims may limit recovery efforts and contribute to greater uncertainty in estimating credit losses. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: tariff, inflation, interest rate
“Our financial condition and results of operations are influenced by monetary, fiscal, and trade policies, including those of the Federal Reserve, the U.S. Treasury, and other governmental authorities. Actions by these authorities may lead to inflation, deflation, changes in interest rates, or other economic conditions that could materially adversely affect our results of operations. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: tariff, supply chain, inflation

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Our primary market areas are in the Puget Sound region of Washington and Kitsap, Clallam, Jefferson, Grays Harbor, Thurston, and Benton counties. Following the acquisition of seven banking branches in 2023, our footprint expanded to include Klickitat County in Washington, and Lincoln, Malheur and Tillamook counties in Oregon. Adverse economic conditions in our market areasareas, including declining employment, reduced consumer spending, or business failures, could impactadversely affect our growth rate, reduce ourgrowth, customers’ ability to repay loans, and adversely impactconsequently, our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Broader economic factors such as inflation, unemployment and money supply fluctuations also may adversely affect our profitability. Trade wars, tariffs, or shifts in trade policies between the United States and other nations could disrupt supply chains, increase costs for businesses, and reduce export opportunities for our customers. These developments may, in turn, negatively impact these businesses and, by extension, our operations and financial performance.
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: investigation, litigation

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Failure to align ourDEI DEIand ESG efforts with the current legal framework could result in reputational damage,harm, legal challenges, and adverse impacts on our operations. Government investigations, enforcement actions, or private litigation challenging our DEI-related policies could lead to financial penalties, increased legal costs, and potential restrictionslimitations on our ability to engage in government contracting. Moreover, various privatePrivate third-party organizations continue to evaluate companies based on ESG and DEI practices.evaluations Unfavorablemay ratings from these entities couldfurther influence investor decisions, limit access to capital, and generatestakeholder negative sentiment among stakeholders.perception.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (35)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 8 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Our primary market areas are in the Puget Sound region of Washington and Kitsap, Clallam, Jefferson, Grays Harbor, Thurston, and Benton counties. Following the acquisition of seven banking branches in 2023, our footprint expanded to include Klickitat County in Washington, and Lincoln, Malheur and Tillamook counties in Oregon. Adverse economic conditions in our market areasareas, including declining employment, reduced consumer spending, or business failures, could impactadversely affect our growth rate, reduce ourgrowth, customers’ ability to repay loans, and adversely impactconsequently, our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Broader economic factors such as inflation, unemployment and money supply fluctuations also may adversely affect our profitability. Trade wars, tariffs, or shifts in trade policies between the United States and other nations could disrupt supply chains, increase costs for businesses, and reduce export opportunities for our customers. These developments may, in turn, negatively impact these businesses and, by extension, our operations and financial performance.

Added

Broader macroeconomic factors may also adversely affect our performance. Although inflation has moderated, higher input costs and persistent wage pressures continue to affect many borrowers, while the Federal Reserve's interest rate reductions in late 2025 have resulted in increased margin compression and reduced yields on adjustable- and variable-rate loans. Additionally, slowing economic activity, shifting consumer sentiment, and higher levels of household debt may negatively affect credit performance in our consumer and commercial portfolios. Trade disputes, tariffs, U.S. - China tensions, and shifting global supply chain patterns may continue to influence operating costs for our commercial borrowers, particularly those dependent on construction materials, manufacturing inputs, or exports.

Reworded

A downturn in economic conditions, be itwhether due to inflation,recessionary aconditions, recession,inflation war,or deflation, interest rate volatility, geopolitical conflicts, market instability, adverse weather,weather events, or other factors, could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, and results of operations,operations. includingAny butof notthese limitedconditions could lead to:

Reworded

OurA substantial portion of our loan portfolio predominantlyconsists comprisesof assetsloans secured by real estate or fixtures affixed to real property. Any deteriorationdecline in the real estate marketsmarket associatedvalues withcould thematerially collateralaffect securingborrowers' mortgageability to repay loans couldand significantly impact borrowers' repayment capabilities andreduce the value of collateral. Real estate values are affected by various factors, including economic conditions,trends, governmentalgovernment rulesregulations, orzoning and tax policies, andinterest rates, natural disasters such(including as earthquakes,earthquakes and trade-relatedfloods), pressuresand thatdisruptions may affectin construction costs or materials availability.supply. IfForced we are required to liquidate a significant amountliquidation of collateral during a periodperiods of reduceddeclining real estate values,values could materially impair our financial condition and profitabilityresults couldof be adversely affected.operations.

Reworded

Monetary policy, interest rate volatility, inflation, deflation, and other external economic factors could adversely impact our financial performance and operations.

Added

Our financial condition and results of operations are influenced by monetary, fiscal, and trade policies, including those of the Federal Reserve, the U.S. Treasury, and other governmental authorities. Actions by these authorities may lead to inflation, deflation, changes in interest rates, or other economic conditions that could materially adversely affect our results of operations. Tariffs, supply-chain disruptions, or rising costs could reduce the ability of our clients, particularly small- and medium-sized businesses, to repay loans, negatively affecting credit quality and financial performance. Prolonged inflation may increase operational costs, including wages and benefits, while fluctuations in interest rates and the yield curve can significantly impact our net interest income. Interest rates may not move in alignment with inflation or deflation, adding uncertainty to the economic environment.

Removed

Our financial condition and results of operations are affected by credit policies of monetary authorities, particularly the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, or the Federal Reserve. Actions by monetary and fiscal authorities, including the Federal Reserve, could lead to inflation, deflation, or other economic phenomena that could adversely affect our financial performance. Higher U.S. tariffs on imported goods could exacerbate inflationary pressures by increasing the cost of goods and materials for businesses and consumers. This may particularly affect small- to medium-sized businesses as they are less able to leverage economies of scale to mitigate cost pressures compared to larger businesses. Consequently, our business clients may experience increased financial strain, reducing their ability to repay loans and adversely impacting our results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, a prolonged period of inflation could cause wages and other costs to us to increase, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Virtually all of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature, and as a result, interest rates tend to have a more significant impact on our performance than general levels of inflation or deflation. However, interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or magnitude as the prices of goods and services, creating additional uncertainty in the economic environment.

Reworded

Our consumer loans accounted for $620.2$597.0 million, or 24.5%22.5% of our total gross loan portfolio as of December 31, 2024,2025, of which $541.9$525.8 million (87.4%88.1% of total consumer loans) consisted of indirect home improvement loans (some of which were not secured by a lien on the real property), $74.9$68.1 million (12.1%2.6% of total consumer loans) consisted of marine loans secured by boats, and $3.3$3.0 million (0.5%0.1% of total consumer loans) consisted of other consumer loans, which includes personal lines of credit, credit cards, automobile,automobiles, direct home improvement, loans on deposit, and recreational loans. Generally, we consider these types of loans to involve a higher degree of risk compared to first mortgage loans on owner-occupied, one-to-four-family residential properties. As a result of our large portfolio of consumer loans, it may become necessary to increase the level of provision for credit losses on loans, which would reduce profits. Consumer loans generally entail greater risk than do one-to-four-family residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of loans that are secured by rapidly depreciable assets, such as automobiles and boats. In these cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance.

Reworded

Most of our consumer loans are originated indirectly by or through thirdthird-party parties,dealers, which presents greater risk than our direct lending products whichbecause involveswe do not have direct contact between us andwith the borrower. Unlike a direct loanloans where the borrower makesapplies anwith applicationus directly to us,directly, in theseindirect loansoriginations the dealer, who has a direct financial interest in completing the loan transaction,sale, assists the borrower in preparing the loan application. Although we disburse the loan proceeds directly to the dealer upon receipt of a “completion certificate” signed by the borrower, becausethe weabsence do not haveof direct contactinteraction with the borrower,borrower theseincreases loansthe mayrisk be more susceptible to aof material misstatementmisstatements onin the loan application or havingmisuse theof loan proceeds beingby misused byeither the borrower or the dealer. In addition, if the work is not properly performed, the borrower may cease payment on the loan until the problem is rectified.

Reworded

A significant portion of our business involves commercial real estate lendinglending, which is subject to various risks that could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.

Reworded

At December 31, 2024,2025, our loan portfolio included $590.5$969.5 million of commercial real estate loans, or 36.5% of our total gross loan portfolio, including $174.9$177.1 million secured by non-owner occupied commercial real estate properties, and $245.2$262.2 million of multi-family real estate loans, or 23.3% of our total gross loan portfolio.loans. The credit risk associated with these types of loans is generally higher than that of one-to-four-family residential loans. Repayment typically depends on the successful operation and income stream of the property securing the loan, as well as the value of the real estate collateral, both of which can be significantly affected by economic conditions.

Reworded

At December 31, 2024,2025, our commercial business loan portfolio included commercial and industrial loans of $287.0$301.1 million, or 11.3%, and warehouse lending of $12.9$28.2 million, or 0.4%,1.1%, of our total gross loan portfolio. Commercial business lending involves risks that are different from those associated with residential and commercial real estate lending. Real estate lending is generally considered to be collateral-based lending with loan amounts based on predetermined loan to collateral values and liquidation of the underlying real estate collateral being viewed as the primary source of repayment in the event of borrower default. Our commercial and industrial business loans are primarily made based on the cash flow of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The borrowers’ cash flow may be unpredictable and collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. This collateral may consist of equipment, inventory, accounts receivable, or other business assets. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers. Other collateral securing these loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise, may be illiquid, and may fluctuate in value based on the specific type of business and equipment. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial and industrial business loans may be substantially dependent on the success of the business itself, which,which in turn, is often dependent in part upon general economic conditions and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. For additional information see, “Our residential mortgage warehouse lending andprogram construction warehouse lending programs areis subject to various risks that could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.”

Reworded

Our lending activities include extending real estate construction loans to individuals and builders, primarily for residential property development. As of December 31, 2024,2025, our construction and development loan portfolio totaled $330.7$396.5 million, constituting 13.1%14.9% of our total gross loan portfolio, excluding $174.1$235.4 million in unfunded construction loan commitments. Of this portfolio, $223.3$266.2 million was allocated to speculative residential real estate projects, and $42.0$42.3 million was allocated to non-speculative residential custom construction. Additionally, we had threetwo commercial note-secured lines of credit totaling $47.5$55.0 million in commitments, directed towards residential construction re-lenders with an outstanding balance of $10.7$29.2 million at December 31, 2024.2025. The risks associated with the collateral underlying our commercial construction warehouse lines are similar to those associated with our residential construction and development loans.

Reworded

At December 31, 2024,2025, we had approved residential warehouse lending lines to three companies in varying amounts from $3.0 million to $9.0 million, for an aggregate amount of $19.5$15.5 million. At December 31, 2024,2025, there was $2.2$2.5 million outstanding under these residential warehouse lines, compared to $573,000$2.2 million outstanding at December 31, 2023.2024.

Removed

The ongoing Los Angeles wildfires that began in January 2025 present heightened risks to our loan portfolio and the adequacy of our allowance for credit losses. Borrowers impacted by the fires may face financial hardship, leading to increased loan defaults and reduced repayment capacity. Damage to or destruction of properties securing loans may result in collateral value depreciation, further increasing potential losses. Additionally, inadequate insurance coverage or denied claims may limit recovery efforts and contribute to greater uncertainty in estimating credit losses. Local economic disruptions, such as business closures and job losses, may impair borrowers’ ability to meet financial obligations, requiring adjustments to our credit loss assumptions. While we had no direct losses related to the Los Angeles wildfires, the concentration of our loan portfolio in fire-prone areas further increases exposure, while the growing frequency and severity of wildfires due to climate change heightens long-term risks. These factors may necessitate increases to our allowance for credit losses to account for elevated credit risks. While we continuously evaluate our allowance to ensure it reflects current and expected risks, there can be no assurance it will be sufficient to cover actual losses, particularly in the context of ongoing and future wildfire-related challenges.

Added

Severe flooding in Western Washington and Oregon in November 2025, as well as the increasing frequency and severity of flood and wildfire events, could materially and adversely affect the credit quality of our loan portfolio and the adequacy of our allowance for credit losses.

Added

The catastrophic flooding that occurred in November 2025 in Western Washington and Oregon has heightened the risks associated with our loan portfolio, particularly in flood-prone areas where we have significant credit exposure. Borrowers affected by the flooding may experience financial hardship, impairing their ability to meet their loan obligations and increasing the likelihood of delinquencies, nonperforming loans, and charge-offs. Damage to, or destruction of properties securing our loans may also reduce collateral values, which could increase potential losses.

Added

Our ability to recover losses may be further limited if borrowers lack adequate insurance coverage or if insurance claims are delayed or denied. In addition, the flooding caused economic disruption in the impacted communities, including business closures and job losses, which continue to reduce borrowers' repayment capacity and require adjustments to our credit loss assumptions.

Added

Moreover, climate-related events, including both flooding and wildfires, are occurring with greater frequency and severity. These trends may increase the long-term risks to our loan portfolio and may necessitate increases to our allowance for credit losses. While we regularly evaluate the adequacy of our allowance based on current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts, there can be no assurance that our allowance will be sufficient to cover actual losses, particularly if sever weather-related events persist or worsen.

Reworded

At December 31, 2024,2025, our nonperforming assets (which consisted of nonaccrual loans, other real estate owned (“OREO”), and other repossessed assetsloans) were $13.6$18.7 million or 0.54%0.59% of total assets. Nonperforming assets adversely affect our earnings in various ways. We do not record interest income on nonaccrual loans or foreclosed assets, thereby adversely affecting our income and increasing our loan administration costs. Upon foreclosure or similar proceedings, we record the repossessed asset at the estimated fair value, less costs to sell, which may result in a write down or loss. If we experience increases in nonperforming loans and nonperforming assets, our losses and troubled assets could increase significantly, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations, as our loan administration costs could increase, each of which could have an adverse effect on our net income and related ratios, such as return on assets and equity. A significant increase in the level of nonperforming assets from current levels would also increase our risk profile and may impact the capital levels our regulators believe are appropriate in light of the increased risk profile.

Reworded

Our earnings and cash flows are largely dependent upon our net interest income, which is significantly affected by interest rates. Interest rates are highly sensitive to factors beyond our control, such asincluding general economic conditionsconditions, market expectations, and policies set by governmental and regulatory bodies, particularly the Federal Reserve. Increases in interest rates could reduce our net interest income, weaken the housing market by further curbing refinancing activity and home purchases, and negatively affect the broader U.S. economy, potentially leading to slower economic growth or recessionary conditions. Interest rates may have remained elevated in 2025, with volatility continuing in short- and long-term yields, which may affect net interest income and credit quality.

Reworded

Our net interest margin, the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities, can be adversely affected by interest rate changes. While yields on assets and costs of liabilities tend to move in the same direction, they may do so at different speeds, causing the margin to expand or contract. As our interest-bearing liabilities often have shorter durations than our interest-earning assets, a rise in the interest rates may lead to funding costs increasing faster than asset yields, compressing our net interest margin. Additionally, changes in the slope of the yield curve, such as flattening or inversion, can further pressure our margins as funding costs rise relative to asset yields. Conversely, falling rates cancould increase loan prepayments, leading to reinvestment in lower-yielding assets, and reducing income.

Reworded

In a heightened rate environment, retaining deposits can become more costly. At December 31, 2024,2025, we held $869.3$1.06 millionbillion in certificates of deposit maturing within one year and $1.31$1.53 billion in noninterest-bearing and NOW checking accounts, and savings and money market accounts. If deposit and borrowing rates rise faster than loan and investment yields, our net interest income and overall earnings could decline. Additionally, adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit may face increased default risks in a rising rate environment.

Reworded

Interest rate fluctuations also influence the fixed-rate investment securities, which inversely correlatescorrelate with rate changes. At December 31, 2024,2025, the fair value of our securities available-for-sale was $281.2$288.7 million, with unrealized net losses of $29.1$16.8 millionmillion, net of tax, reflected in stockholders' equity. These unrealized losses on securities have been partially offset by unrealized gains on cash flow and fair value hedges with net unrealized gains of $7.2$992,000, millionnet of tax, at December 31, 2024.2025. Further declines in fair value from risingsustained ratesor additional rate increases could have an adverse effect on stockholders’ equity.

Reworded

Decreases in the fair value of securities available-for-sale resulting from increases in interest rates could have an adverse effect on shareholders’ equity. Additionally, there is no assurance that the declinesdecline in market value will not result in credit losses, which would lead to additional provisions for credit losses that could materially affect our net income and capital levels.

Reworded

Under federal and state laws and regulations governing the safety and soundness of insured depository institutions, regulatory agencies such as state banking regulators, the DFI, the Federal Reserve, and the FDIC (as the insurer of bank deposits), have the authority to compel or restrict our actions if they determine that our capital levels are insufficient or that we are operating in a manner inconsistent with safe and sound banking practices. In addition to safety and soundness examinations, we and our subsidiaries are subject to oversight by state and federal regulators, including the CFPB,regulators to ensure compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and consumer protection initiatives. This regulatory process may result in requirements to address identified concerns through informal or formal supervisory actions, such as board resolutions, memoranda of understanding, written agreements, or consent or cease-and-desist orders, requiring corrective actions or prohibiting specific activities. Failure to comply with the terms of such actions or directives could result in heightened supervisory measures, including consent orders, prompt corrective action restrictions, or additional regulatory penalties. These actions could impose significant restrictions on our ability to pursue new or existing business initiatives, which may adversely affect our business, reputation, and operational flexibility.

Reworded

The effects of climate change continue to raise significant concerns about the state of the environment. However,Federal underand a new Trump administration, federalstate policy may shiftapproaches to reduce the emphasis on climate change initiativescontinue to evolve, and environmentalchanges regulations.in Thislegislative or regulatory priorities could include scaling back federal participation in international agreements, such asalter the Paris Agreement,requirements and reducingexpectations regulatory pressuresplaced on businesses, including banks, to address climate-related risks. Legislative and regulatory proposals aimed at combating climate change may face greater scrutiny or diminished priority.

Reworded

The Company is a separate legal entity from its subsidiary and does not have significant operations of its own. The long-term ability of the Company to pay dividends to its stockholders and debt payments is based primarily upon the ability of the Bank to make capital distributions to the Company, and also on the availability of cash at the holding company level. The availability of dividends from the Bank is limited by the Bank’s earnings and capital, as well as various statutes and regulations. In the event,event the Bank is unable to pay dividends to the Company, the Company may not be able to pay dividends on its common stock or make payments on its outstanding debt. Consequently, the inability to receive dividends from the Bank could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects. At December 31, 2024,2025, FS Bancorp had $9.2$8.1 million in unrestricted cash to support dividend and debt payments.

Added

Recent federal actions, including changes in federal DEI and ESG guidance, have shifted oversight of DEI and ESG practices. These developments alter the regulatory expectations and compliance requirements for companies with DEI and ESG initiatives. This shift increases compliance risk for companies with DEI and ESG initiatives, and new guidance may restrict voluntary programs and training, potentially requiring policy changes, reporting adjustments, and operational modifications.

Added

At the same time, state-level requirements remain inconsistent. Some continue to mandate diversity or climate disclosures, while others limit DEI and ESG activities, creating additional operational complexity for multi-state businesses.

Removed

In light of the recent executive order titled “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity,” which revokes previous mandates promoting DEI and directs federal agencies to combat “illegal DEI” practices in the private sector, we must reassess our ESG strategies to ensure compliance with the evolving regulatory environment. The order signals a shift in federal oversight and enforcement priorities, potentially affecting internal policies, hiring practices, supplier diversity programs, and corporate governance frameworks.

Removed

The executive order rescinds prior directives, such as Executive Order 11246, which required affirmative action and non-discriminatory practices by federal contractors. As a result, federal agencies may reevaluate existing contracts, scrutinize hiring and promotion policies, and take enforcement actions against companies perceived to be engaging in practices that do not align with the revised federal standards. Additionally, new guidance or rulemaking stemming from the executive order could impose restrictions on voluntary DEI initiatives, training programs, or supplier diversity efforts. These developments may necessitate changes to our internal policies, reporting obligations, and public disclosures, creating operational and compliance challenges.

Reworded

Failure to align ourDEI DEIand ESG efforts with the current legal framework could result in reputational damage,harm, legal challenges, and adverse impacts on our operations. Government investigations, enforcement actions, or private litigation challenging our DEI-related policies could lead to financial penalties, increased legal costs, and potential restrictionslimitations on our ability to engage in government contracting. Moreover, various privatePrivate third-party organizations continue to evaluate companies based on ESG and DEI practices.evaluations Unfavorablemay ratings from these entities couldfurther influence investor decisions, limit access to capital, and generatestakeholder negative sentiment among stakeholders.perception.

Reworded

While the executive order aims to eliminate specific DEI programs,Although investors, customers, and other stakeholders maycontinue stillto expect transparency and commitment to broader ESG goals, including workforce diversity, community engagement, and responsible corporategovernance, governance. Companies that scalescaling back DEI initiativesor ESG efforts to comply with federal mandates may facetrigger backlashcriticism from institutional investors, advocacy groups, and employeesemployees. whoMeanwhile, viewmisalignment suchwith actionsstate aslaws aor retreatrating fromagencies socialcould responsibilityaffect commitments.market Additionally, inconsistencies between federalperception and state-level DEI policies may create further complexities, as certain states continueaccess to mandate affirmative action or corporate diversity disclosures.capital.

Removed

Adapting to the recent regulatory changes is crucial to maintaining our reputation, ensuring operational continuity, and meeting stakeholder expectations in the evolving ESG landscape. Noncompliance or perceived noncompliance with the executive order and related regulatory guidance could expose us to increased regulatory scrutiny, litigation risks, and limitations on business opportunities. At the same time, misalignment with investor and stakeholder expectations regarding ESG and DEI commitments could impair our brand value, reduce employee engagement and retention, and negatively impact our stock performance. Given these factors, we must carefully assess and adjust our policies, disclosures, and risk mitigation strategies to navigate the shifting legal and business environment effectively.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

51new paragraphs
50removed paragraphs
35reworded paragraphs
10,548 → 9,513words in section

New heading “Comparison of Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024”

New heading “Capital Resources”

Removed heading “Comparison of Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2023 and 2022”

Removed heading “Liquidity and Capital Resources”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: default, fine
“The PD calculation looks at the historical loan portfolio at points in time (each month during the lookback period) to determine the probability that loans in a certain cohort will default over the next 12-month period. A default is defined as a loan that has moved to past due 90 days and greater, nonaccrual status, or experienced a charge-off during the period. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: liquidity
“Liquidity and Capital Resources”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: liquidity, interest rate

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

CDs, which include both retail and non-retail CDs, decreasedincreased $67.9$101.5 million to $1.13 billion at December 31, 2025, from $1.03 billion at December 31, 2024, from December 31, 2023, primarily due to a reduction in non-retail CDs.2024. Retail CDs increased $151.8$47.6 million to $874.1$921.7 million at December 31, 2024,2025, from $722.3$874.0 million at December 31, 2023,2024. while non-retailNon-retail CDs, which include brokered CDs, online CDs and public funds CDs decreasedincreased $219.7$53.9 million to $154.8$208.7 million, compared to $374.5$154.9 million at December 31, 2023. The decrease in non-retail CDs2024, was primarily due to aan decreaseincrease of $218.3$58.9 million in brokered CDs, asoffset managementby shifteda itsdecrease fundingof source$5.9 tomillion FHLBin advancesonline for more favorable rates.CDs. Non-retail CDs represented 15.0%18.5% and 33.7%15.1% of total CDs at December 31, 20242025 and December 31, 2023,2024, respectively. The increase in non-retail CDs aligns with the Company's strategy to manage interest rate risk and liquidity by accessing larger and more diversified funding sources at competitive rates that were only slightly higher than local market rates, and to reduce reliance on higher cost borrowings.
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: default

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Management utilizesestimates the ACL using relevant available information, from internal and external sources, relating to past events, current conditions, historical loss experience, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The lookbackACL periodis inmaintained at a level sufficient to provide for expected credit losses over the analysislife includesof the asset based on evaluating historical datacredit fromloss 2009experience toand present.making Adjustmentsadjustments to historical loss information arefor madedifferences whenin managementthe determinesspecific historicalrisk datacharacteristics isin notthe likelycurrent reflectiveportfolio. These factors include, among others, changes in the size and composition of the currentportfolio, portfoliodelinquency suchrates, as limited data sets or lack of default oractual loss history.experience Managementand maycurrent selectivelyeconomic apply external market data to subjectively adjust the Company’s own loss history including index or peer data. Accrued interest receivable is excluded from the estimate of credit losses on loans.conditions.
see in full comparison
New text topics: tariff, inflation
“Net loan charge-offs totaled $8.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to $5.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily due to a partial charge-off of $2.3 million on a commercial construction loan reflecting the expected loss on the project, along with $2.1 million in increased net charge-off in indirect home improvement loans. These increases were partially offset by decreases in charge-offs of C&I loans of $551,000 and marine loans of $292,000. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: default
“The LGD calculation looks at actual losses (net charge-offs) experienced over the entire lookback period for each cohort of loans. The aggregate loss amount is divided by the exposure at default to determine an LGD rate. All loan defaults (non-accrual, charge-off, or greater than 90 days past due) occurring during the lookback period are included in the denominator, whether a loss occurred or not and exposure at default is determined by the loan balance immediately preceding the default event (i.e., nonaccrual or charge-off). …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (136)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 6 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

1st Security Bank has been serving the Puget Sound area since 1907, which includes whenthe period in which the predecessor to Anchor Bank, one of its banking acquisitions, was formed. On July 9, 2012, the Bank converted from mutual to stock ownership and became the wholly owned subsidiary of FS Bancorp.

Reworded

The Company is relationship-driven, delivering banking and financial services to local families, local and regional businesses and industry niches in suburban communities in the greater Puget Sound area, the Kennewick-Pasco-Richland metropolitan area of Washington, also known as the Tri-Cities, as well as Goldendale, Vancouver, and White Salmon, Washington and Manzanita, Newport, Ontario, Tillamook, and Waldport, Oregon.

Removed

On February 24, 2023, the Company completed its purchase of seven retail bank branches from Columbia State Bank (the “Branch Acquisition”) and acquired approximately $425.5 million in deposits and $66.1 million in loans. The seven acquired branches are in the communities of Goldendale and White Salmon, Washington, and Manzanita, Newport, Ontario, Tillamook, and Waldport, Oregon. The Branch Acquisition expanded our Puget Sound-focused retail footprint into southeast Washington and the state of Oregon as well as providing an opportunity to extend our unique brand of community banking into those communities.

Reworded

The Company also maintains its long-standing indirect consumer lending platform which operates primarily throughout the Western United States. The Company emphasizes long-term relationships with families and businesses within the communities served, working with them to meet their financial needs. The Company is also actively involved in community activities and events within these market areas, which further strengthens ourits relationships within thosethese markets.

Added

As a diversified lender, the Company specializes in originating one-to-four-family residential loans, CRE mortgages, second mortgages, consumer loans, marine lending, and commercial business loans.

Removed

As a diversified lender, the Company specializes in originating various types of loans, including CRE, multi-family, construction, one-to-four-family, and home equity loans, as well as, consumer loans, such as fixture secured loans, and marine loans, along with commercial business loans. The Company's lending strategies aim to capitalize on new lending opportunities, arising from recent market consolidation, and focus on relationship lending.

Reworded

At December 31, 2024,2025, the Company's loan portfolio includedconsisted of the following major categories: CRE loans, residential real estate loans, consumer loans, and commercial business loans representing 63.7%,36.5%, 24.5%,28.6%, 22.5% and 11.8%12.4% of the total loan portfolio, respectively.

Added

Indirect home improvement loans to finance window, gutter, siding replacement, solar panels, spas, and other improvement renovations are a large segment of the consumer loan portfolio. These indirect home improvement loans are dependent on the Company's contractor/dealer network of 33 currently active fixture dealerships located throughout Washington, Oregon, California, Idaho, Colorado, Nevada, Arizona, Minnesota, Texas, Utah, Massachusetts, Montana, and New Hampshire. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company originated 6,146 indirect home improvement loans with an aggregate total of $138.2 million. Five contractor/dealer accounted for 77.5% of the dollar volume funded in this category. In addition, four states represented nearly three-quarters of the loan originations: Washington, Oregon, California, and Colorado with 37.0%, 19.0%, 12.9%, and 6.5% of total loan volume, respectively.

Removed

A significant portion of our consumer loan portfolio consists of fixture secured loans, which are used to finance home improvement projects such as window and gutter replacements, siding upgrades, solar panel installations, and spas. These loans rely heavily on our network of 46 active contractors and dealers across Washington, Oregon, California, Idaho, Colorado, Nevada, Arizona, Minnesota, Texas, Utah, Massachusetts, Montana, and New Hampshire. Five of these contractor/dealers were responsible for 74.1% of the dollar volume of funded loans for the year ended December 31, 2024. The Company funded $121.3 million, consisting of 5,444 loans in the fixture-secured consumer loan category during the year ended December 31, 2024.

Removed

The following table details fixture secured loan originations by state for the periods indicated:

Reworded

The Company originates one-to-four-family residential mortgage loans through referrals from real estate agents, financial planners, builders, and from existing customers. Retail banking customers are also an important source of the Company’s loan originations. The Company originated $695.2$716.6 million of one-to-four-family loans (which included loans held for sale, loans held for investment and fixed seconds) in addition to $20.5$22.9 million of loans brokered to other institutions through the home lending segment during the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, of which $564.8$555.2 million were sold to investors. Of the loans sold to investors, $233.9$209.1 million were sold to the FNMA, FHLMC, FHLB, and GNMA with servicing rights retained for the purpose of further developing these customer relationships. At December 31, 2024, one-to-four-family residential mortgage loans held for investment totaled $617.3 million, or 24.4% of the total gross loan portfolio, while loans held for sale totaled $27.8 million and residential home equity loans totaled $75.1 million at that date.

Reworded

For the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, one-to-four-family loan originations and refinancing activity increased compared to the prior period as a result of slightlychanges decreased marketin interest rates and slightlyeconomic more housing inventory.conditions. Residential construction and development lending, while not as common as other loan origination options like one-to-four-family loans, continues to be an important element in our total loan portfolio, and we continue to take a disciplined approach by concentrating our efforts on loans to builders and developers in our market areas known to us. These short-term loans typically have a maturity period of six to 18 months, with disbursements not fully realized at origination, leading to a short-term reduction in net loans receivable.

Reworded

The Company is significantly affected by prevailing economic conditions, as well as government policies and regulations concerning, among other things, monetary and fiscal affairs. Deposit flows are influenced by a number of factors, including interest rates paid on time deposits, other investments, account maturities, and the overall level of personal income and savings. Lending activities are influenced by the demand for funds, the number and quality of lenders, and regional economic cycles. Sources of funds for lending activities include primarily deposits, including brokered deposits, borrowings, payments on loans, and income provided from operations.

Reworded

The Company’s earnings are primarily dependent upon net interest income, the difference between interest income and interest expense. Interest income is a function of the balances of loans and investments outstanding during a given period and the yield earned on these loans and investments. Interest expense is a function of the amount of deposits and borrowings outstanding during the same period and the interest rates paid on these deposits and borrowings. The Company's earnings are also affected by fee income from mortgage banking activities, the provision for (recovery of) credit losses, service charges and fees, gains from sales of assets, operating expenses and income taxes.

Added

The Company's earnings are also affected by fee income from mortgage banking activities, the provision for (reversal of) credit losses, service charges and fees, gains from sales of assets, operating expenses and income taxes.

Added

Allowance for Credit Losses (“ACL”) on Loans. The ACL reflects Management’s evaluation of our loans and their estimated loss potential, as well as the risk inherent in various components of the portfolio. Significant judgment and assumptions are applied in estimating the ACL. These judgments, assumptions and estimates are susceptible to significant changes based on the current environment. Among the material estimates required to establish the allowance for credit losses are a reasonable and supportable forecast; a reasonable and supportable forecast period and the reversion period; value of collateral; strength of guarantors; the amount and timing of future cash flows for loans individually evaluated; and determination of the qualitative loss factors.

Removed

ACL on Held-to-Maturity Securities. Management measures expected credit losses on held-to-maturity securities by individual security. Accrued interest receivable on held-to-maturity debt securities is excluded from the estimate of credit losses. The estimate of expected credit losses considers credit ratings and historical credit loss information that is adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts.

Removed

The held-to-maturity portfolio consists entirely of corporate securities. Securities are generally rated investment grade. Securities are analyzed individually to establish a reserve.

Removed

ACL on Available-for-Sale Securities. For available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position, management first assesses whether it intends to sell or is more likely than not to be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met, the security’s amortized cost basis is written down to fair value through income. For debt securities available-for-sale that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the Company evaluates whether the decline in fair value has resulted from credit losses or other factors. In making this assessment, management considers the extent to which fair value is less than amortized cost, any changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency, and adverse conditions specifically related to the security, among other factors. If this assessment indicates that a credit loss exists, the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security are compared to the amortized cost basis of the security. If the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis, a credit loss exists and an ACL is recorded, limited by the amount that the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis.

Removed

Changes in the ACL are recorded as a provision for (recapture of) credit losses. Losses are charged against the ACL when management believes the uncollectability of an available-for-sale security is confirmed or when either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met. Accrued interest receivable on available-for-sale debt securities is not included in the estimate of credit losses.

Removed

ACL on Loans. The ACL on loans is a valuation account that is deducted from the loans’ amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on the loans. Loans are charged off against the ACL when management believes the uncollectability of a loan balance is confirmed and recaptures are credited to the ACL when received. In the case of recaptures, amounts may not exceed the aggregate of amounts previously charged off.

Reworded

Management utilizesestimates the ACL using relevant available information, from internal and external sources, relating to past events, current conditions, historical loss experience, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The lookbackACL periodis inmaintained at a level sufficient to provide for expected credit losses over the analysislife includesof the asset based on evaluating historical datacredit fromloss 2009experience toand present.making Adjustmentsadjustments to historical loss information arefor madedifferences whenin managementthe determinesspecific historicalrisk datacharacteristics isin notthe likelycurrent reflectiveportfolio. These factors include, among others, changes in the size and composition of the currentportfolio, portfoliodelinquency suchrates, as limited data sets or lack of default oractual loss history.experience Managementand maycurrent selectivelyeconomic apply external market data to subjectively adjust the Company’s own loss history including index or peer data. Accrued interest receivable is excluded from the estimate of credit losses on loans.conditions.

Added

During 2025, the change in the allowance was primarily driven by loan portfolio growth, changes in delinquency rates, and changes in economic forecast assumptions utilized in the Company’s expected credit loss models. Key forecast variables impacting the estimate included projected unemployment rates, interest rates, and other macroeconomic factors. The Company also updated certain qualitative adjustment factors to reflect observed trends in credit performance and portfolio composition. While the overall modeling framework and methodology remained consistent with the prior year, updates to economic forecasts and qualitative factors resulted in changes to the estimated lifetime loss rates across several portfolio segments.

Added

The ACL is sensitive to changes in economic forecasts and qualitative assumptions. Holding other assumptions constant, deterioration in economic conditions comparable to the Company’s adverse forecast scenario would result in an increase in the ACL, while improvement in forecast assumptions would reduce the allowance. Changes in qualitative factors related to portfolio concentrations, collateral values, or credit performance trends could also materially affect the ACL.

Added

Because current economic conditions and forecasts can change and future events make it inherently difficult to predict the anticipated amount of estimated credit losses on loans, management's determination of the appropriateness of the ACL, could change significantly. It is difficult to estimate how potential changes in any one economic factor or input might affect the overall allowance because a wide variety of factors and inputs are considered in estimating the allowance and changes in those factors and inputs considered may not occur at the same rate and may not be consistent across all product types. Additionally, changes in factors and inputs may move independently of one another, such that improvement in one or certain factors may offset deterioration in others. Thus, as a result of the significant size of the loan portfolio, the numerous assumptions in the model, and the high degree of potential change in such assumptions, there is a high degree of sensitivity to the reported amounts.

Added

Management believes that the ACL was adequate as of December 31, 2025.

Removed

The ACL on loans is measured on a collective cohort basis when similar risk characteristics exist. Generally, collectively assessed loans are grouped by call report code and then risk-grade grouping. Risk grade is grouped within each call report code by pass, watch, special mention, substandard, and doubtful. Other loan types are separated into their own cohorts due to specific risk characteristics for that pool of loans.

Removed

The Company has elected a non-discounted cash flow methodology with probability of default (“PD”) and loss given default (“LGD”) for all call report code cohorts (“cohorts”), except for the indirect and marine portfolios which are evaluated under a vintage methodology. The vintage methodology measures the expected loss calculation for future periods based on historical performance by the origination period of loans with similar life cycles and risk characteristics. Guaranteed portions of loans are measured with zero risk due to cash collateral and full government agency guaranty.

Removed

The PD calculation looks at the historical loan portfolio at points in time (each month during the lookback period) to determine the probability that loans in a certain cohort will default over the next 12-month period. A default is defined as a loan that has moved to past due 90 days and greater, nonaccrual status, or experienced a charge-off during the period. In cohorts where the Company’s historical data is insufficient due to a minimal amount of default activity or zero defaults, management uses index PDs comprised of rates derived from the PD experience of other community banks in place of the Company’s historical PDs. Additionally, management reviews all other cohorts to determine if index PDs should be used outside of these criteria.

Removed

The LGD calculation looks at actual losses (net charge-offs) experienced over the entire lookback period for each cohort of loans. The aggregate loss amount is divided by the exposure at default to determine an LGD rate. All loan defaults (non-accrual, charge-off, or greater than 90 days past due) occurring during the lookback period are included in the denominator, whether a loss occurred or not and exposure at default is determined by the loan balance immediately preceding the default event (i.e., nonaccrual or charge-off). Due to limited charge-off history, management uses index LGDs comprised of rates derived from the LGD experience of other community banks in place of the Company’s historical LGDs.

Removed

The Company utilizes reasonable and supportable forecasts of future economic conditions when estimating the ACL on loans. The calculation includes a 12-month PD forecast based on the Company’s regression model comparing peer nonperforming loan ratios to the national unemployment rate. After the forecast period, PD rates revert on a straight-line basis back to long-term historical average rates over a 12-month period. Due to limited default history, management uses index PDs comprised of rates derived from the PD experience of other community banks in place of the Company’s historical PDs.

Removed

The Company recognizes that all significant factors that affect the collectability of the loan portfolio must be considered to determine the estimated credit losses as of the evaluation date. Furthermore, the methodology, in and of itself and even when selectively adjusted by comparison to market and peer data, does not provide a sufficient basis to determine the estimated credit losses. The Company adjusts the modeled historical losses by qualitative and environmental adjustments to incorporate all significant risks to form a sufficient basis to estimate the credit losses.

Removed

Loans classified as nonaccrual, are reviewed quarterly for potential individual assessment. Any loan classified as a nonaccrual that is not determined to need individual assessment is evaluated collectively within its respective cohort.

Removed

Where the primary and/or expected source of repayment of a specific loan is believed to be the future liquidation of available collateral, impairment will generally be measured based upon expected future collateral proceeds, net of disposition expenses including sales commissions as well as other costs potentially necessary to sell the asset(s) (i.e., past due taxes, liens, etc.). Estimates of future collateral proceeds will be based upon available appraisals, reference to recent valuations of comparable properties, use of consultants or other professionals with relevant market and/or property-specific knowledge, and any other sources of information believed appropriate by management under the specific circumstances. When appraisals are ordered to support the impairment analysis of an individually evaluated loan, the appraisal is reviewed by the Company’s internal appraisal reviewer.

Removed

Where the primary and/or expected source of repayment of a specific loan is believed to be the receipt of principal and interest payments from the borrower and/or the refinancing of the loan by another creditor, impairment will generally be measured based upon the present value of expected proceeds discounted at the contractual interest rate. Expected refinancing proceeds may be estimated from review of term sheets received by the borrower from other creditors and/or from the Company’s knowledge of terms generally available from other banks.

Removed

Expected credit losses are estimated over the contractual term of the loans, adjusted for expected prepayments when appropriate. The contractual term excludes expected extensions, renewals and modifications. Prepayment assumptions will be determined by analysis of historical behavior by loan cohort.

Removed

ACL on Unfunded Commitments. The Company estimates expected credit losses over the contractual period in which the Company is exposed to credit risk via a contractual obligation to extend credit unless that obligation is unconditionally cancellable by the Company. The ACL on unfunded commitments is adjusted through a provision for (recovery of) credit losses. The estimate includes consideration of the likelihood that funding will occur and an estimate of expected credit losses on commitments expected to be funded over its estimated life. The estimate utilizes the same factors and assumptions as the ACL on loans and is applied at the same collective cohort level.

Reworded

The Company’s primary objective is to operate 1st Security Bank as a well-capitalized, profitable, independent, community-oriented financial institution, serving customers in its primary market area defined generally as the greater Puget Sound market area. The Company’s strategy is to provide innovative products and superior customer service to small businesses, industry and geographic niches, and individuals located in its primary market area. Services are currently provided to communities through the main office, 27 full-service bank branches and 13 loan production offices (seven of which are stand-alone), which are supported withby 24/7 access to on-lineonline banking and participation in a worldwide ATM network.

Reworded

The Company focuses on diversifying revenues, expanding lending channels, and growing the banking franchise. Management remains focused on building diversified revenue streams basedwhile uponmanaging credit, interest rate, and concentration risks. The Board of Directors seeks to accomplish the Company’s objectives through the adoption of a strategy designed to improve profitability andprofitability, maintain a strong capital positionposition, and preserve high asset quality. This strategy primarily involves:

Reworded

Growing and diversifying the loan portfolio and revenue streams. The Company is a diversified lender that seeks to grow and maintain the current level of diversification in its portfolio. At December 31, 2024,2025, the Company's loan portfolio included CRE loans, residential real estate loans, consumer loans, and commercial business loans representing 63.7%,36.5%, 24.5%,28.6%, 22.5%, and 11.8%12.4% of the total loan portfolio, respectively.

Reworded

Maintaining strong asset quality. The Company believes that strongStrong asset quality is a key todriver of long-term financial success. The percentagepercentages of nonperforming loans to total gross loans were 0.54%0.71% and 0.45%0.54% at December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively. The percentagepercentages of nonperforming assets to total assets were 0.45%0.59% and 0.37%0.45% at December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively. Management actively addresses delinquent loans and nonperforming assets by pursuing aggressive collection efforts for consumer debts, marketing saleable foreclosed or repossessed properties, working onresolving classified assets' resolutionsassets, and implementing loan charge-offs. In recent years, the Company focused on originating consumer loans for borrowers with higher credit scores, generally,generally over 720720, while maintaining flexibility within its lending policy. While the Company plans to emphasize specific lending products, including commercial and multi-family real estate loans, construction and development loans (including speculative residential construction loans), and commercial business loans, it remains committed to expanding the size of its one-to-four-family residential mortgage loans and consumer loan portfolios. Throughout these initiatives, the Company maintains a conservative approach to lending and manages credit exposures by leveraging the expertise of experienced bankers.

Reworded

Capturing customers’ full relationship. The Company offers a wide range of products and services that provide diversification of revenue sources and solidify the relationship with the Bank’s customers. The Company focuses on core retail and business deposits, including savings and checking accounts, thatto lead tosupport long-term customer retention. As part of the commercial lending process, cross-selling the entire business banking relationship, including deposit relationships and business banking products, such as online cash management, treasury management, wires, direct deposit, payment processing and remote deposit capture. The Company’s mortgage banking program also provides opportunities to cross-sell products to new customers.

Reworded

Expanding the Company’s markets. In addition to deepening relationships with existing customers, the Company intends to broaden its customer base by leveraging the Company’s well-established community involvement. ThisThe strategy involves selectively emphasizing products and services tailored to meet the specific banking needs of new customers. Additionally, the Company plans to extend its presence into other market areas through targeted expansion of its home lending network.

Added

Assets. Total assets increased $167.7 million to $3.20 billion at December 31, 2025, from $3.03 billion at December 31, 2024, primarily due to increases of $121.2 million in loans receivable, net, $24.8 million in securities held-to-maturity, $15.9 million in loans held for sale, and $14.3 million in premises and equipment, partially offset by a decrease of $7.7 million in FHLB stock, $3.4 million in total cash and cash equivalents, $3.2 million in core deposits intangible, net, and $2.3 million in bank owned life insurance. Assets growth was primarily funded by increases in interest-bearing deposits, primarily driven by the increase in brokered deposits.

Added

Loans receivable, net, increased $121.2 million, to $2.62 billion at December 31, 2025, compared to $2.50 billion at December 31, 2024.

Added

● CRE loans increased $98.1 million, primarily reflecting:

Added

○ $73.3 million in commercial and speculative construction and development loans, ○ $16.9 million in multi-family loans, ○ $5.7 million in CRE owner occupied loans, and ○ $2.2 million in CRE non-owner occupied loans.

Added

● Residential real estate loans increased $17.0 million, driven by:

Added

○ $13.1 million in home equity loans,

Added

○ $11.4 million in one-to-four-family loans (excluding loans held for sale), and ○ partially offset by a decrease of $7.6 million in residential custom construction loans.

Added

● Total undisbursed construction and development loan commitments increased $61.3 million to $235.4 million at December 31, 2025, from $174.1 million at December 31, 2024.

Added

● Commercial business loans increased $29.4 million, reflecting increases of $15.3 million in warehouse lending and $14.1 million in commercial and industrial (“C&I”) loans.

Added

● Consumer loans decreased $23.2 million, primarily due to declines of $16.1 million in indirect home improvement loans and $6.8 million in marine loans.

Added

Overall, loan growth was concentrated in commercial construction and development, multi-family, and residential real estate segments, reflecting continued demand in those markets. Consumer balances, primarily indirect home improvement loans, declined presumably due to volatile economic conditions, as the Company continued to manage indirect exposures.

Removed

Assets. Total assets increased $56.5 million to $3.03 billion at December 31, 2024, from $2.97 billion at December 31, 2023. The increase was primarily due to increases in loans receivable, net of $100.5 million, other assets of $21.3 million and FHLB stock of $13.5 million. These increases were partially offset by decreases in interest-bearing deposits at other financial institutions of $36.3 million, CDs at other financial institutions of $22.4 million, securities available-for-sale of $11.8 million, MSRs held for sale of $8.1 million and core deposit intangible of $3.6 million. The net increase in total assets was primarily funded by borrowings during the year ended December 31, 2024.

Removed

Loans receivable, net, increased $100.5 million, to $2.50 billion at December 31, 2024, from $2.40 billion at December 31, 2023. Total real estate loans increased $83.3 million to $1.61 billion at December 31, 2024, compared to December 31, 2023, reflecting increases in one-to-four-family portfolio loans of $49.6 million, construction and development loans of $27.6 million, multi-family loans of $21.5 million, and home equity loans of $5.7 million, offset by a decrease in CRE loans of $21.0 million. Undisbursed construction and development loan commitments increased $19.5 million, or 12.6%, to $174.1 million at December 31, 2024, as compared to $154.6 million at December 31, 2023. Commercial business loans increased $44.1 million to $299.9 million at December 31, 2024, compared to December 31, 2023, as a result of increases in C&I loans of $48.7 million, offset by a decrease in warehouse lending of $4.7 million. Consumer loans decreased $26.6 million to $620.2 million at December 31, 2024, compared to December 31, 2023, primarily due to decreases of $28.0 million in indirect home improvement loans, offset by an increase of $1.6 million in marine loans.

Reworded

Loans held for sale, consisting of one-to-four-family loans, increased $2.2$15.9 million to $43.7 million at December 31, 2025, from $27.8 million at December 31, 2024, fromreflecting $25.7continued million at December 31, 2023. The Company continues to investinvestment in its home lending operations and strategicallystrategic managemanagement of production capacity in the markets we serve.capacity.

Reworded

Originations of one-to-four-family loans to purchase and to refinance a home for the periods indicated were as follows:

Reworded

During the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, the Company sold $564.8$555.2 million of one-to-four-family loans, compared to $408.0$564.8 million one year ago. The decrease in loan sales reflects a more competitive market environment and lower purchase volume, partially offset by higher refinance activity. The Company remains focused on managing loan production capacity and maintaining a pipeline consistent with market demand. Gross margin on home loansloan sales increased towas 3.08% for theboth yearyears ended December 31, 2024,2025 comparedand to 3.07% for the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. Gross margin is defined as the margin on loans sold without the impact of deferred loan costs.

Added

The ACL on loans totaled $31.9 million, or 1.20% of gross loans receivable (excluding loans held for sale), at December 31, 2025, compared to $31.9 million, or 1.26%, at December 31, 2024. The ACL on unfunded loan commitments increased $360,000 to $1.8 million at December 31, 2025, from $1.4 million at December 31, 2024, primarily reflecting growth in commercial and speculative construction and development loan commitments. Total loans 30 days or more past due were unchanged at $22.2 million, or 0.84% of total loans, from $22.2 million, or 0.88% of total loans during the prior year period, reflecting similar economic conditions year over year.

Showing the first 60 of 136 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-08-10 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-05-08 (period ending 2026-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

0new paragraphs
0removed paragraphs
0reworded paragraphs
20 → 20words in section

The section in the latest 10-Q reads in full:

There have been no material changes in the Risk Factors previously disclosed in FS Bancorp’s 2025 Form 10-K.

No wording changes found in this section.

Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

26new paragraphs
10removed paragraphs
49reworded paragraphs
5,669 → 7,167words in section

New heading “Comparison of Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”

New heading “Average Balances, Interest and Average Yields/Cost”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: liquidity, interest rate
“Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $2.1 million to $65.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, from $63.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to an increase in total interest income of $3.5 million, partially offset by an increase in total interest expense of $1.4 million. The increase in total interest income was primarily due to a higher average balance of loans outstanding. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: fine, interest rate

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company sold $154.7$310.8 million of one-to-four-family loans, compared to $91.9$219.0 million for the same period one year ago. The increase in loan2025, sales reflects improved mortgage rates which is also drivingreflecting higher refinance activity.activity driven by more favorable interest rates. The Company remainscontinues focusedto on managingmanage loan production capacity andin maintainingan effort to maintain a pipeline consistent with market demand. Gross margin on home loan sales (defined as the margin on loans sold, excluding the impact of deferred loan costs) was 3.03%3.01% for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to 3.26%3.14% for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The compression in gross margin reflects competitive pricing pressurespressure in the current mortgage market environment as the Company maintained production volume consistent with market demand. Gross margin is defined as the margin on loans sold without the impact of deferred loan costs.
see in full comparison
New text
“Comparison of Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: liquidity

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $1.6 million$536,000 to $32.5$32.6 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, from $31.0$32.1 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, primarily due to an increase in total interest income of $2.5 million,$959,000, partially offset by an increase in total interest expense of $982,000.$423,000. The $959,000 increase in total interest income was primarily due to an increase of $2.7$1.2 million in interest income on loans receivable, including fees, drivenresulting primarilyfrom bynet aloan five-basis point increase in the average yield earned on loans receivable as new loans were originated at higher rates and variable-rate loans repriced higher, and a higher average balance of loans outstanding.growth. The $423,000 increase in total interest expense was primarily the result ofreflected a $1.7 million$612,000 increase in deposit interest expense,expense reflectingon significantlyborrowings resulting from higher average borrowing balances in interest-bearing checking accounts, including brokered deposits, and a 108 basis point$423,000 increase in theinterest rate paidexpense on those accounts. Additionally, the repricing of the Company's subordinated notesnote following its repricing to a floatinghigher interest rate on February 15,in 2026, contributed $206,000 of incremental interest expense. These increases were partially offset by ana $879,000$612,000 decrease in borrowinginterest costs,expense ason the Company reduced average borrowings by $86.4 million in accordance with its funding and liquidity strategy.deposits.
see in full comparison
New text
“Average Balances, Interest and Average Yields/Cost”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: liquidity

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

CDs,Certificates of deposit (“CDs”), which include both retail and non-retail CDs, decreased $19.8$173.3 million to $1.11$957.1 billionmillion at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, from $1.13 billion at December 31, 2025. Retail CDs decreased $5.0$4.3 million to $916.7$917.4 million at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, from $921.7 million at December 31, 2025. Non-retail CDs, which include brokered CDs, online CDs and public funds CDs decreased $14.9$169.0 million to $193.8$39.7 million, compared to $208.7 million at December 31, 2025, primarily due to a decrease of $15.3$167.0 million in brokered CDs. Non-retail CDs represented 17.5%4.2% and 18.5% of total CDs at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. The decrease in non-retail CDs alignsreflects the Company’s funding strategy of replacing certain brokered deposits with thelower-cost Company'sFHLB strategyand FRB borrowings, while continuing to manage liquidity and interest rate risk and liquidity by accessing larger and more diversified funding sources at competitive rates that were only slightly higher than local market rates, while reducing reliance on higher cost borrowings.risk.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (85)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company's loan portfolio consisted of the following major categories: CRE loans, residential real estate loans, consumer loans, and commercial business loans representing 37.2%,37.8%, 28.8%,29.8%, 21.9%,21.5%, and 12.1%10.9% of the portfolio, respectively.

Reworded

Indirect home improvement loans to finance window, gutter, siding replacement, solar panels, spas, and other improvement renovations represent a large segment of the consumer loan portfolio. These loans are sourced through a contractor/dealer network of 3027 active fixture dealerships located throughout Washington, Oregon, California, Idaho, Colorado, Nevada, Arizona, Minnesota, Texas, Utah, Massachusetts, Montana, and New Hampshire. During the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company originated 1,1811,221 indirect home improvement loans with an aggregate total of $26.6$28.9 million. Five contractor/dealers accounted for 71.7%72.9% of the dollar volume funded in this category, and fourthree states – Washington, Oregon, California, and UtahCalifornia – represented nearly three-quarters of total loan originations at 36.4%,33.9%, 21.0%, 15.3%,25.3%, and 4.7%,14.6%, respectively.

Reworded

The Company originates one-to-four-family residential mortgage loans through referrals from real estate agents, financial planners, builders, and existing customerscustomers, with retail banking customers also serving as an important source of loan originations. During the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company originated $204.9$202.7 million of one-to-four-family loans (including loans held for sale, loans held for investment, and fixed seconds). In addition, $3.1$2.6 million of loans were brokered to other institutions through the home lending segment. Of the loans originated, $154.7$156.1 million were sold to investors, of which $73.6$72.7 million were sold to the FNMA and FHLMC with servicing rights retained to maintain and further develop these customer relationships.

Reworded

For the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, one-to-four-family loan originations and refinancing activity increased compared to the prior period, driven by changes in interest rates and economic conditions. Residential construction and development lending, while less common than other origination options, remains an important element of the total loan portfolio. The Company continues to take a disciplined approach concentrating its efforts on loans to builders and developers in its known market areas. These short-term loans typically carry a maturity of six to 18 months, with disbursements not fully realized at origination, resulting in a short-term reduction in net loans receivable.

Reworded

Comparison of Financial Condition at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025

Reworded

Assets. Total assets remaineddecreased virtually$17.8 unchangedmillion to $3.18 billion at June 30, 2026, compared to $3.20 billion at March 31, 2026, compared to December 31, 2025.2025, Theprimarily mostdue significantto changesdecreases betweenof these periods were a $17.7$19.2 million decrease in securities available-for-sale, a $12.6$13.2 million increase in loans held for sale, aand $10.5$1.5 million increasein core deposit intangible, partially offset by increases of $6.4 million in FHLB stock, $5.8 million in loans receivable, net, $1.6 million in securities held-to-maturity, $1.5 million in total cash and cash equivalents, and a $919,000 increase$866,000 in loansoperating receivable,lease net.right-of-use Assetassets. Loan growth was funded primarily funded by brokeredborrowings, deposits.which also replaced a decline in deposit funding during the period.

Removed

Loans receivable, net, was $2.62 billion at both March 31, 2026, and December 31, 2025.

Removed

● Commercial real estate (“CRE”) loans increased $17.4 million, primarily reflecting:

Removed

○ $6.2 million in CRE owner occupied loans,

Removed

○ $5.5 million in CRE non-owner occupied loans,

Removed

○ $4.5 million in commercial and speculative construction and development loans, and ○ $1.2 million in multi-family loans.

Removed

● Residential real estate loans increased $4.2 million, driven by:

Removed

○ $2.2 million in one-to-four-family loans (excluding loans held for sale), ○ $1.8 million in residential custom construction loans, and ○ $197,000 in home equity loans.

Reworded

●Loans Totalreceivable, undisbursednet constructionincreased and development loan commitments decreased $16.9$5.8 million to $218.5$2.63 millionbillion at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, fromcompared $235.4to million$2.62 billion at December 31, 2025.2025:

Added

● Commercial real estate (“CRE”) loans increased $35.5 million, primarily reflecting:

Added

○ $16.3 million in commercial and speculative construction and development loans, ○ $11.1 million in CRE non-owner occupied loans, and ○ $8.1 million in CRE owner occupied loans.

Added

● Residential real estate loans increased $34.1 million, driven by:

Added

○ $31.8 million in one-to-four-family loans (excluding loans held for sale), and ○ $2.4 million in residential custom construction loans.

Reworded

● Commercial business loans decreased $6.7$40.8 million, reflecting a decrease of $10.0$20.9 million in warehouse lending,lending partiallyand offset by an increase of $3.4$19.9 million in commercial and industrial (“C&I”) loans.

Reworded

● Consumer loans decreased $13.5$23.8 million, primarily due to declinesthe decline of $12.4$23.7 million in indirect home improvement loans and $989,000 in marine loans.

Reworded

Overall,In summary, loan growth was concentrated in CRE, including owner occupied, non-owner occupied,CRE and construction and development loans, and to a lesser extent, multi-family andone-to-four-family residential reallending, estatewhile segments. Consumerconsumer balances declined, driven primarily by a reduction in indirect home improvement loans, reflecting the impact of current economic conditions on consumer demand.

Added

Total undisbursed construction and development loan commitments decreased $19.9 million to $215.5 million at June 30, 2026, from $235.4 million at December 31, 2025.

Reworded

Loans held for sale, consisting of one-to-four-family loans, increaseddecreased $12.6$13.2 million to $56.3$30.5 million at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, from $43.7 million at December 31, 2025, reflecting higher origination volume driven by increased refinance activity resulting from improved mortgage rates.2025.

Reworded

For the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, one-to-four-family loan originations and refinancing activity increased significantlyincreased, compared to the priorsix period,months ended June 30, 2025, driven by improved mortgage ratesrates. whichRefinance resultedvolume inincreased a$56.6 175%million increaseor in104.9%, refinanceand volume. Purchasepurchase originations also increased $18.9$12.0 million.million or 15.7%,4.1%, reflecting continued demand in the Company'sCompany’s market areas.

Reworded

During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company sold $154.7$310.8 million of one-to-four-family loans, compared to $91.9$219.0 million for the same period one year ago. The increase in loan2025, sales reflects improved mortgage rates which is also drivingreflecting higher refinance activity.activity driven by more favorable interest rates. The Company remainscontinues focusedto on managingmanage loan production capacity andin maintainingan effort to maintain a pipeline consistent with market demand. Gross margin on home loan sales (defined as the margin on loans sold, excluding the impact of deferred loan costs) was 3.03%3.01% for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to 3.26%3.14% for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The compression in gross margin reflects competitive pricing pressurespressure in the current mortgage market environment as the Company maintained production volume consistent with market demand. Gross margin is defined as the margin on loans sold without the impact of deferred loan costs.

Reworded

The ACL on loans totaled $32.4$31.2 million, or 1.22%,1.17%, of gross loans receivable (excluding loans held for sale), at March 31,June 30, 2026, compared to $31.9 million, or 1.20%, at December 31, 2025. The ACL on unfunded loan commitments decreased $121,000$39,000 to $1.6$1.7 million at March 31,June 30, 2026, from $1.8 million at December 31, 2025. Total loans 30 days or more past due increaseddecreased to $23.2$16.6 million, or 0.87%0.62% of total loans, from $22.2 million, or 0.84%, at December 31, 2025, reflecting softeningimproved credit performance across the broader loan portfolio,portfolio drivenas bythe markets respond to current economic conditions and their impact on borrower cash flows.

Reworded

Nonperforming loans, consisting solely of nonaccrual loans, decreased $477,000$3.1 million to $18.3$15.6 million at March 31,June 30, 2026, from $18.7 million at December 31, 2025. The decrease was primarily attributable to a $2.3 million charge-off on a nonperforming commercial construction loan, and a decrease of $1.4 million in nonperforming CRE owner occupied loans, whichprimarily decreased $762,000due to $10.5loan million, and nonperforming C&I loans, which decreased $415,000 to $165,000,payoffs, partially offset by an increase of $500,000 in nonperforming indirect home improvement loans, which increased $366,000 to $4.6 million and nonperforming residential loans, which increased $290,000 to $2.5 million.loans. The ratio of nonperforming loans to total gross loans reduced slightly to 0.69%0.59% at March 31,June 30, 2026, from 0.71% at December 31, 2025.

Reworded

Classified loans totaled $26.1$25.0 million at March 31,June 30, 2026, compared to $27.3 million at December 31, 2025. The coverage ratio of the ACL on loans to nonperforming loans was 177.7%199.2% at March 31,June 30, 2026, compared to 170.6% at December 31, 2025. The increase in the coverage ratio primarily reflects increasedthe provisiondecline forin nonperforming loans relative to the ACL on loans.

Reworded

Overall, asset quality trends reflectreflected improved delinquency and nonperforming loan metrics, continued growth in CRE, construction, multi-family,CRE, and residential loan segments,portfolios, ongoing elevated losses in certain consumer loan portfolios, and continued risk management and monitoring of nonperforming and substandard exposures.

Reworded

Liabilities. Total liabilities weredecreased $29.0 million to $2.86 billion at June 30, 2026, from $2.89 billion at both March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025. The loan-to-deposit ratio was approximately 102.9%108.6% at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to approximately 100.9% at December 31, 2025.

Reworded

Total deposits decreased $36.1$224.8 million to $2.64$2.45 billion at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, from $2.67 billion at December 31, 2025, reflecting decreases in allmost of the deposit categories other than escrow accounts.categories. Transactional accounts (noninterest-bearing checking, interest-bearing checking and escrow accounts) decreased $13.7$54.7 million to $980.0$938.8 million at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, from $993.6 million at December 31, 2025, primarily due to decreases of $12.4$38.5 million in interest-bearing checking, $17.4 million in noninterest-bearing checking, and $9.2an offsetting increase of $1.1 million in interest-bearing checking, partially offset by an $8.0 million increase in escrow accounts related to mortgages serviced, reflecting higher customer balances andassociated increased activity inwith mortgage servicing.servicing activities. Money market and savings accounts decreasedincreased $2.5$3.3 million to $547.1$553.0 million at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, from $549.7 million at December 31, 2025, primarily reflecting a decline$9.0 million increase in moneysavings marketaccount balances, partially offset by ana increase$5.8 million decrease in retailmoney andmarket businessaccount savings accounts.balances.

Reworded

CDs,Certificates of deposit (“CDs”), which include both retail and non-retail CDs, decreased $19.8$173.3 million to $1.11$957.1 billionmillion at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, from $1.13 billion at December 31, 2025. Retail CDs decreased $5.0$4.3 million to $916.7$917.4 million at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, from $921.7 million at December 31, 2025. Non-retail CDs, which include brokered CDs, online CDs and public funds CDs decreased $14.9$169.0 million to $193.8$39.7 million, compared to $208.7 million at December 31, 2025, primarily due to a decrease of $15.3$167.0 million in brokered CDs. Non-retail CDs represented 17.5%4.2% and 18.5% of total CDs at MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. The decrease in non-retail CDs alignsreflects the Company’s funding strategy of replacing certain brokered deposits with thelower-cost Company'sFHLB strategyand FRB borrowings, while continuing to manage liquidity and interest rate risk and liquidity by accessing larger and more diversified funding sources at competitive rates that were only slightly higher than local market rates, while reducing reliance on higher cost borrowings.risk.

Reworded

The Bank had uninsured deposits of approximately $704.2$719.5 million or 26.7%29.4% of total deposits, at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to approximately $718.1 million or 26.9% of total deposits at December 31, 2025. The uninsured amounts are estimates based on the methodologies and assumptions used for the Bank’s regulatory reporting requirements.

Reworded

Borrowings increased $38.0$195.2 million to $167.3$324.5 million at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, from $129.3 million at December 31, 2025. The increase reflects a shift toward FHLB and FRB borrowings, which offered more competitive rates on borrowings, compared tothan brokered deposits,deposits during the period, consistent with the Company's funding strategy. At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, borrowings were comprised of FHLB and FRB advances.

Reworded

Stockholders’ Equity. Total stockholders’ equity increased $6.2$11.3 million to $313.9$319.0 million at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, from $307.7 million at December 31, 2025. The increase primarily reflects net income of $7.8$15.8 million. Declines in the fair value of available-for-sale securities recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) were largely offset by improvements in the fair value of interest rate swap cash flow hedges, resulting in a net improvement of $83,000,$4.1 million, net of tax. Gains and losses in fair value reflect changes in market interest rates during the periods. The increase in shareholders’ equity was partially offset by cash dividends paid totaling $2.2$4.3 million, and share repurchases of $620,000.$4.3 million.

Reworded

Book value per common share was $42.42$43.57 at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $41.55 at December 31, 2025. The calculation of book value per share at MarchJune 31,30, 2026, was based on 7,398,5717,320,801 common shares, derived by subtracting the102,971 102,971of unvested restricted stock shares from the 7,501,5427,423,772 reported common shares outstanding as of that date. Similarly, the book value per share at December 31, 2025, was calculated based on 7,404,548 common shares, after deducting 102,971 of unvested restricted stock shares from the 7,507,519 reported common shares outstanding as of that date.

Reworded

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025

Reworded

General. Net income was $7.8$7.9 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $8.0$7.7 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The decreaseincrease was primarily due to a $937,000,$980,000, or 58.9%,19.0%, increase in total noninterest income and a $536,000 increase in net interest income, partially offset by a $620,000 increase in provision for credit losses, a $627,000,$602,000, or 43.5%,2.4%, increase in total noninterest expense and an $86,000 increase in provision for income taxes, and a $465,000, or 1.9%, increase in total noninterest expense, partially offset by a $1.6 million, or 5.0%, increase in net interest income, and a $275,000, or 5.4%, increase in total noninterest income.taxes.

Reworded

Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $1.6 million$536,000 to $32.5$32.6 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, from $31.0$32.1 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, primarily due to an increase in total interest income of $2.5 million,$959,000, partially offset by an increase in total interest expense of $982,000.$423,000. The $959,000 increase in total interest income was primarily due to an increase of $2.7$1.2 million in interest income on loans receivable, including fees, drivenresulting primarilyfrom bynet aloan five-basis point increase in the average yield earned on loans receivable as new loans were originated at higher rates and variable-rate loans repriced higher, and a higher average balance of loans outstanding.growth. The $423,000 increase in total interest expense was primarily the result ofreflected a $1.7 million$612,000 increase in deposit interest expense,expense reflectingon significantlyborrowings resulting from higher average borrowing balances in interest-bearing checking accounts, including brokered deposits, and a 108 basis point$423,000 increase in theinterest rate paidexpense on those accounts. Additionally, the repricing of the Company's subordinated notesnote following its repricing to a floatinghigher interest rate on February 15,in 2026, contributed $206,000 of incremental interest expense. These increases were partially offset by ana $879,000$612,000 decrease in borrowinginterest costs,expense ason the Company reduced average borrowings by $86.4 million in accordance with its funding and liquidity strategy.deposits.

Added

Net interest margin (“NIM”) (annualized) was unchanged at 4.30% for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the same period in the prior year. NIM remained relatively stable during the periods.

Removed

Net interest margin (“NIM”) (annualized) decreased one basis point to 4.31% for the three months ended March 31, 2026, from 4.32% for the same period the prior year. The change in NIM primarily reflects the repricing of the Company's subordinated notes to a floating rate on February 15, 2026, which resulted in an estimated two-basis point decline in NIM for the quarter, and higher funding costs associated with growth in interest-bearing checking balances, including brokered deposits. These effects were largely offset by a five-basis point improvement in average loan yields and a modest decline in CD rates.

Reworded

Interest Income. Total interest income for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, increased $2.5 million$959,000 to $49.3$49.7 million, from $46.8$48.7 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The increase was primarily due to a $2.7$1.2 million increase in interest income on loans receivable, including fees, as a result of higher average loan balancesbalances, andpartially offset by a five-basis point increase inlower average loan yields.yield. Offsetting this growth were decreases in interest income on investment securities and FHLBinterest-bearing stock,deposits at other financial institutions, collectively totaling $190,000,$266,000, primarily reflecting yieldlower compressionaverage on taxable investment securities from 4.34% to 3.99%balances and lower averageyields FHLBon stockinterest-bearing balances.deposits at other financial institutions.

Reworded

The following table compares average interest-earning asset balances, associated yields, and resulting changes in interest income for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025:

Reworded

Interest Expense. Total interest expense increased $982,000$423,000 to $16.8$17.0 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, from $15.8$16.6 million for the comparable quarter in 2025, primarily due to an increase of interest$612,000 expense on deposits of $1.7 million, partially offset by a decrease of $879,000 ofin interest expense on borrowings.borrowings Theresulting from higher depositaverage costs were the result of an increase in interest-bearing checkingborrowing balances, includingwhich brokeredwas deposits, combined with a 108-basis point increase in the rate paid on those accounts, partiallyfully offset by a $332,000 decrease in interest expense on CDsdeposits duefor the same amount, reflecting primarily a shift from brokered deposits to borrowings, and a $423,000 increase in interest expense on the subordinated note following its repricing to a 19-basishigher pointinterest declinerate in CD rates. Additionally, the repricing of the Company's subordinated notes to a floating rate on February 15, 2026, contributed $206,000 of incremental interest expense.2026.

Reworded

The average cost of total interest-bearing deposits decreased three-basis11-basis points to 2.97%2.92% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to 3.00%3.03% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, primarily reflecting lower rates paid on certificates of deposit,CDs, which more than offset higher rates on interest-bearing checking and savings and money market accounts. The average balance of total interest-bearing deposits increaseddecreased $243.6$13.5 million to $2.0$1.91 billion for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $1.77$1.92 billion for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, driven primarily by ana increasedecrease in CDs, partially offset by increases in interest-bearing checking balances,and includingsavings brokeredand deposits.money market accounts.

Reworded

The average cost of total interest-bearing liabilities similarly decreased fourone-basis basis pointspoint to 3.11%,3.12%, reflecting the benefit of the lower borrowingCD costscost, aspartially averageoffset borrowingsby declinedthe $86.4higher million.cost of the subordinated note following its repricing. The average cost of funds, which includes noninterest-bearing checking, increased onetwo- basis pointpoints to 2.39%,2.41%, from 2.39% for the three months ended June 30, 2025, primarily reflectingattributable to the repricing of the subordinated note to a lowerhigher proportioninterest of noninterest-bearing deposits in the overall funding mix.rate.

Reworded

The following table details average balances of interest-bearing liabilities, associated rates, and resulting change in interest expense for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025:

Reworded

Provision for Credit Losses. For the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the provision for credit losses was $2.5$2.6 million, consisting of a $2.6 million provision for credit losses on loans and aan $121,000$82,000 recoveryprovision ofon credit losses on unfunded loan commitments. This compares to a $1.6$2.0 million provision for credit losses for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.2025, which consisted of a $1.5$1.7 million provision for credit losses on loans, a $21,000$154,000 provision for credit losses on held‑to‑maturityheld-to-maturity securities, and a $66,000$151,000 provision for credit losses on unfunded loan commitments. The increase in the provision for credit losses on loans primarily reflects an increase in nonperforming loans and higher net charge‑offs.offs during the period.

Added

Net loan charge-offs totaled $3.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $1.2 million during the three months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was primarily attributable to a further charge-off on an existing commercial construction loan relationship that was previously partially charged off in 2024, as well as higher net charge-offs within the indirect home improvement portfolio. The additional charge-off reflects leasing uncertainty and updated appraised values for the underlying property, as well as continued pressure on commercial real estate values in the surrounding market. Management expects final resolution of the relationship during the second half of 2026. The increase in indirect home improvement loan net charge-offs primarily reflects elevated delinquency levels within portions of the portfolio.

Removed

Net loan charge-offs totaled $2.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $1.7 million during the three months ended March 31, 2025. The increase was primarily due to a $624,000 increase in indirect home improvement loan net charge-offs, partially offset by a $281,000 decrease in commercial business loan net charge-offs, with the remainder attributable to slightly higher net charge-offs in marine and consumer loans. The rise in indirect home improvement and consumer loan net charge-offs reflects continued credit stress in those portfolios amid a challenging economic environment that could result in a material increase in the ACL on loans and adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Reworded

Noninterest Income. Noninterest income increased $275,000$980,000 to $5.4$6.2 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, from $5.1$5.2 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The increase primarily reflects a $684,000$609,000 increase in gain on sale of loans,loans partially offset byand a $246,000$404,000 decreaseincrease in other noninterest income, and a $171,000 decrease in service charges and fee income.

Added

Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense increased $602,000 to $26.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $25.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The $602,000 increase was primarily attributable to a $1.5 million increase in salaries and benefits expense resulting from annual compensation adjustments implemented during the second quarter as part of the Company's annual compensation review process, as well as higher benefit costs. In addition, the Company recorded $417,000 in acquisition-related costs associated with the previously announced merger with Pacific West. These increases were partially offset by a $1.1 million reduction in operations expense, primarily due to an $800,000 decrease in the mortgage purchase reserve for estimated losses to mortgage loan repurchase obligations. The reduction reflects the seasoning of loans originated during the high-volume production years of 2020 and 2021, which has reduced the expected level of future repurchase-related losses.

Removed

Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense increased $465,000 to $25.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $25.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The $465,000 increase was primarily due to the following increases: $334,000 in loan costs, due to higher origination activity, $321,000 in salaries and benefits, primarily due to competitive wage adjustments; $295,000 in acquisition cost related to the previously announced merger with Pacific West Bancorp; and $159,000 in occupancy expense related to branch renovations. These increases were partially offset by a $451,000 decrease in data processing expenses attributable to executed contract negotiations with the Company's data processing vendors, and a $172,000 decrease in professional and board fees.

Reworded

The efficiency ratio, which is calculated by dividing noninterest expense by totalthe sum of net interest income and noninterest income, improved to 67.25%67.28% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to 69.39%68.40% for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, due to revenue growth outpacing noninterest expense.

Reworded

Provision for Income Taxes. For the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company recorded a provision for income taxes of $2.1 million, compared to $1.4$2.0 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The effective corporate income tax rates for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, were 20.9%21.1% and 15.2%,20.8%, respectively. The increase in both the provision and effective tax rate was primarily attributable to the absence of alternative energy tax credits under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which benefited the comparable quarter in the prior year.year period.

Added

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025

Added

General. Net income was $15.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $15.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was primarily due to a $2.1 million, or 3.3%, increase in net interest income and a $1.3 million, or 12.2%, increase in total noninterest income, partially offset by a $1.6 million, or 43.1%, increase in provision for credit losses, and a $1.1 million, or 2.1%, increase in total noninterest expense.

Added

Average Balances, Interest and Average Yields/Cost

Added

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated, information regarding average balances of assets and liabilities, as well as the total dollar amounts of interest income from average interest-earning assets and interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, resultant yields, interest rate spread, net interest margin (otherwise known as net yield on interest-earning assets), and the ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities. Also presented are the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets, rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities and the resultant spread for the periods presented. Average balances are daily average balances. The yields on tax-exempt municipal bonds have not been computed on a tax equivalent basis.

Added

Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $2.1 million to $65.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, from $63.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to an increase in total interest income of $3.5 million, partially offset by an increase in total interest expense of $1.4 million. The increase in total interest income was primarily due to a higher average balance of loans outstanding. The increase in total interest expense was primarily the result of a $1.0 million increase in deposit interest expense, reflecting significantly higher average balances in interest-bearing checking accounts, including brokered deposits, and a 95- basis point increase in the rate paid on those accounts. Additionally, the repricing of the Company's subordinated notes to a floating rate on February 15, 2026, contributed $629,000 of incremental interest expense as the applicable interest rate increased following the repricing date. These increases were partially offset by a $267,000 decrease in borrowing costs, as the Company reduced average borrowings by $5.9 million in accordance with its funding and liquidity strategy.

Showing the first 60 of 85 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

FSBW insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 3 filings (2 insiders, 2 trade dates, 3,576 shares, about $153.4K). Net open-market shares: -3,576 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$153.4K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2026-08-28Degner Terri L
Director
Open-market sale 975$43.25 $42.2K1,200 SEC
2026-08-25Degner Terri L
Director
Open-market sale 1,082$42.67 $46.2K0 SEC
2026-08-25Degner Terri L
Director
Open-market sale 612$42.82 $26.2K2,175 SEC
2026-08-25Mccormick Sean
Chief Credit Admin. Officer
Open-market sale 907$42.86 $38.9K4,913 SEC
2026-08-14Mansfield Michael J.
Director
Grant/award 1,200— —70,882 SEC
2026-08-14Jarman Victoria
CHR & WOW! Officer, EVP
Grant/award 2,957— —24,757 SEC
2026-08-14Mccormick Sean
Chief Credit Administration
Shares withheld for tax 263$43.48 $11.4K5,820 SEC
2026-08-14Mccormick Sean
Chief Credit Administration
Grant/award 2,483— —6,083 SEC
2026-08-14Crowl Ben
Chief Lending Officer/EVP
Grant/award 3,164— —19,953 SEC
2026-08-14Crowl Ben
Chief Lending Officer/EVP
Shares withheld for tax 592$43.48 $25.7K19,361 SEC
2026-08-14Nesbitt Robert A
Chief Credit Operations, EVP
Shares withheld for tax 283$43.48 $12.3K6,547 SEC
2026-08-14Nesbitt Robert A
Chief Credit Operations, EVP
Grant/award 2,483— —6,830 SEC
2026-08-14Mullet Matthew D.
President & CEO of the Bank
Shares withheld for tax 1,970$43.48 $85.7K112,416 SEC
2026-08-14Mullet Matthew D.
President & CEO of the Bank
Grant/award 8,046— —114,386 SEC
2026-08-14Burr Erin
CRO & CRA Officer, EVP
Grant/award 2,989— —33,555 SEC
2026-08-14Burr Erin
CRO & CRA Officer, EVP
Shares withheld for tax 649$43.48 $28.2K32,906 SEC
2026-08-14Whittington Phillip Dean
Chief Financial Officer
Grant/award 1,955— —7,034 SEC
2026-08-14Whittington Phillip Dean
Chief Financial Officer
Shares withheld for tax 403$43.48 $17.5K6,631 SEC
2026-08-14Degner Terri L
Director
Grant/award 1,200— —3,437 SEC
2026-08-14Degner Terri L
Director
Shares withheld for tax 650$43.48 $28.3K2,787 SEC
2026-08-14Cofer-Wildsmith Marina
Director
Grant/award 1,200— —7,190 SEC
2026-08-14Cofer-Wildsmith Marina
Director
Shares withheld for tax 188$43.48 $8.2K7,002 SEC
2026-08-14Andrews Pamela Marie
Director
Grant/award 1,200— —13,199 SEC
2026-08-14Adams Joseph C.
Director
Grant/award 1,200— —98,975 SEC
2026-08-14Adams Joseph C.
Director
Shares withheld for tax 2,699$43.48 $117.4K96,276 SEC
2026-08-14Zavaglia Joseph P.
Director
Shares withheld for tax 188$43.48 $8.2K7,468 SEC
2026-08-14Zavaglia Joseph P.
Director
Grant/award 1,200— —7,656 SEC
2026-08-14Nielsen Kelli
Chief Retail Banking, EVP
Grant/award 3,046— —19,069 SEC
2026-08-14Nielsen Kelli
Chief Retail Banking, EVP
Shares withheld for tax 785$43.48 $34.1K18,284 SEC
2026-08-14Allen Shana
Chief Information Office, EVP
Grant/award 3,164— —9,603 SEC
2026-08-14Allen Shana
Chief Information Office, EVP
Shares withheld for tax 561$43.48 $24.4K9,042 SEC
2026-08-14Leech Ted A.
Director, Chairman of the Board
Grant/award 1,200— —2,367 SEC
2026-08-06Jarman Victoria
CHR & WOW! Officer, EVP
Other 87$43.27 $3.8K1,734 SEC
2026-08-06Whittington Phillip Dean
Chief Financial Officer
Other 87$43.27 $3.8K676 SEC
2026-08-06Nesbitt Robert A
CCO Officer/EVP
Other 13$43.27 $563224 SEC
2026-08-06Mullet Matthew D.
Pres & CEO of 1st Security Ban
Other 208$43.27 $9.0K1,830 SEC
2026-08-06Jarman Victoria
CHR & WOW! Officer, EVP
Other 87$43.27 $3.8K1,737 SEC
2026-08-06Zavaglia Joseph P.
Director
Other 58$43.27 $2.5K785 SEC
2026-08-06Nielsen Kelli
Chief Retail Banking, EVP
Other 17$43.27 $750144 SEC
2026-08-06Crowl Ben
Chief Lending Officer, EVP
Other 17$43.27 $750163 SEC
2026-08-06Leech Ted A.
Director, Chairman of the Board
Other 202$43.27 $8.8K625 SEC
2026-08-06Burr Erin
CRO & CRA Officer, EVP
Other 208$43.27 $9.0K3,524 SEC
2026-08-06Whittington Phillip Dean
Chief Financial Officer
Other 87$43.27 $3.8K678 SEC
2026-08-06Allen Shana
Chief Information Officer, EVP
Other 35$43.27 $1.5K355 SEC
2026-08-06Adams Joseph C.
Director
Other 116$43.27 $5.0K2,296 SEC
2026-05-06Nesbitt Robert A
CCO Officer/EVP
Other 14$41.37 $579211 SEC
2026-05-06Costa Donn C
Chief Home Lending, EVP
Other 330$41.37 $13.7K5,089 SEC
2026-05-06Mullet Matthew D.
Pres & CEO of 1st Security Ban
Other 218$41.37 $9.0K1,622 SEC
2026-05-06Mansfield Michael J.
Director
Other 423$41.37 $17.5K5,023 SEC
2026-05-06Leech Ted A.
Director, Chairman of the Board
Other 212$41.37 $8.8K423 SEC
2026-05-06Cofer-Wildsmith Marina
Director
Other 393$41.37 $16.3K836 SEC
2026-05-06Jarman Victoria
CHR & WOW! Officer, EVP
Other 91$41.37 $3.8K1,650 SEC
2026-05-06Zavaglia Joseph P.
Director
Other 60$41.37 $2.5K727 SEC
2026-05-06Whittington Phillip Dean
Chief Financial Officer
Other 91$41.37 $3.8K591 SEC
2026-05-06Allen Shana
Chief Information Officer, EVP
Other 36$41.37 $1.5K320 SEC
2026-05-06Crowl Ben
Chief Lending Officer, EVP
Other 18$41.37 $745146 SEC
2026-05-06Adams Joseph C.
Director, Director/CEO-FS Bancorp, Inc.
Other 181$41.37 $7.5K2,180 SEC
2026-05-06Andrews Pamela Marie
Director
Other 423$41.37 $17.5K5,023 SEC
2026-05-06Nielsen Kelli
Chief Retail Banking, EVP
Other 18$41.37 $745127 SEC
2026-05-06Burr Erin
CRO & CRA Officer, EVP
Other 218$41.37 $9.0K3,316 SEC

Well-known investors holding FSBW (13F)

InvestorQuarterSharesReported value% of their 13FChange vs prior quarter
Renaissance Technologies COM2026-06-30113,513$4.9M0.01%Added 4%
Two Sigma Investments COM2026-06-3037,303$1.6M0.0%Added 3%
AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) COM2026-06-3018,951$822.5K0.0%Added 53%
Millennium Management (Israel Englander) COM2026-06-306,911$299.9K0.0%Reduced 28%
D. E. Shaw & Co. COM2026-06-306,873$298.3K0.0%New position
Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) COM2026-06-304,932$214.0K0.0%New position

13F reports are filed up to 45 days after quarter end and show long U.S. equity positions only; options positions are omitted here.

Coming soon: email alerts when FSBW files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.