GPCR 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Structure Therapeutics Inc. · Nasdaq · Pharmaceutical Preparations · CIK 1888886 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “International trade policies, including tariffs, sanctions and trade barriers may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.”
New heading “Disruptions to the operations of the FDA, the SEC, other U.S. governmental agencies or comparable foreign regulatory authorities caused by funding shortages, leadership changes, staffing cuts or other staffing shortages, along with uncertainty regarding the potential for new initiatives, laws, regulations, policies and guidance affecting our product candidates or other aspects of our business, could materially and adversely affect our business.”
New heading “We conduct certain research and development operations through our Australian wholly-owned subsidiaries. We have voluntarily refunded a research and development tax credit previously received under Australian regulations. If we lose our ability to operate in Australia, or if any of our subsidiaries are unable to receive the research and development tax credit allowed by Australian regulations, or are required to refund any research and development tax credit previously received or reserve for such credit in our financial statements, our business and results of operations could suffer.”
Removed heading “Investing in our securities, involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information contained in this Annual Report, including our consolidated financial statements and their related notes included elsewhere in this Annual”
Removed heading “Disruptions at the FDA and other government agencies caused by funding shortages or global health concerns could hinder their ability to hire, retain or deploy key leadership and other personnel, or otherwise prevent new or modified products from being developed, approved or commercialized in a timely manner or at all, which could negatively impact our business.”
Removed heading “We conduct certain research and development operations through our Australian wholly-owned subsidiaries. If we lose our ability to operate in Australia, or if any of our subsidiaries are unable to receive the research and development tax credit allowed by Australian regulations, or are required to refund any research and development tax credit previously received or reserve for such credit in our financial statements, our business and results of operations could suffer.”
Largest changes
“Additionally, the U.S. Department of Justice issued a rule entitled the Preventing Access to U.S. …”see in full comparison
“International trade policies, including tariffs, sanctions and trade barriers may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.”see in full comparison
“We operate in a global economy, which includes utilizing third-party suppliers in several countries outside the United States. There is inherent risk, based on the complex relationships among the United States and the countries in which we conduct our business, that political, diplomatic and national security factors can lead to global trade restrictions and changes in trade policies and export regulations that may adversely affect our business and operations. …”see in full comparison
“The complexity of announced or future tariffs may also increase the risk that we or our suppliers may be subject to civil or criminal enforcement actions in the United States or foreign jurisdictions related to compliance with trade regulations. Foreign governments may also adopt non-tariff measures, such as procurement preferences or informal disincentives to engage with, purchase from or invest in U.S. entities, which may limit our ability to compete internationally and attract non-U.S. investment, employees, customers and suppliers. …”see in full comparison
“We conduct certain research and development operations through our Australian wholly-owned subsidiaries. We have voluntarily refunded a research and development tax credit previously received under Australian regulations. If we lose our ability to operate in Australia, or if any of our subsidiaries are unable to receive the research and development tax credit allowed by Australian regulations, or are required to refund any research and development tax credit previously received or reserve for such credit in our financial statements, our business and results of operations could suffer.”see in full comparison
“We conduct certain research and development operations through our Australian wholly-owned subsidiaries. If we lose our ability to operate in Australia, or if any of our subsidiaries are unable to receive the research and development tax credit allowed by Australian regulations, or are required to refund any research and development tax credit previously received or reserve for such credit in our financial statements, our business and results of operations could suffer.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (93)
Investing in our securities, involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information contained in this Annual Report, including our consolidated financial statements and their related notes included elsewhere in this Annual
Investing in our securities, involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information contained in this Annual Report, including our consolidated financial statements and their related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report and Part II. Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” before making an investment decision. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition could suffer materially, the trading price of our ADSs could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial also may materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition.
Biopharmaceutical product development is a highly speculative undertaking and involves a substantial degree of risk. We are a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company with a limited operating history, which may make it difficult to evaluate the success of our business to date and assess our future viability. Since our inception in 2016, we have focused primarily on organizing and staffing our company, business planning, establishing our intellectual property portfolio, raising capital, developing our structure-based drug discovery platform, identifying and developing our product candidates, conducting preclinical studies and, more recently, clinical studies, and providing general and administrative support for these operations. Our approach to the discovery and development of product candidates based on our structure-based drug discovery platform is unproven, and we do not know whether we will be able to develop any product candidates that succeed in clinical development oror, if approved, commercially. Further, aleniglipron, our product candidate for obesity, overweight and related conditions, ACCG-2671, our oral small molecule amylin receptor agonist development candidate for the treatment of obesity, ANPA-0073,ANPA-0073 and LTSE-2578, our product candidate for selective or muscle-sparing weight loss, and LTSE-2578, our product candidates for IPF, and, are in early clinical development and our other product candidates and programs are in preclinical development or discovery stages. Accordingly, we have not yet demonstrated an ability to successfully obtain regulatory approvals, manufacture a commercial scale product or arrange for a third party to do so on our behalf, or conduct sales and marketing activities necessary for successful product commercialization. Consequently, any predictions made about our future success or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a history of successfully developing and commercializing biopharmaceutical products.
We have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue to date, and we continue to incur significant research and development and other expenses related to our ongoing operations. As a result, we are not profitable and have incurred significant losses since our inception and expect to continue to incur significant and increasing operating losses for at least the next several years. Our net losses were $141.2 million, $122.5 million and $89.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $329.1$470.3 million. Substantially all of our losses have resulted from expenses incurred in connection with our research and development programs and from general and administrative costs associated with our operations. All of our product candidates will require substantial additional development time and resources, including additional funding to conduct Phase 3 clinical studies of aleniglipron, before we would be able to apply for or receive marketing approvals and begin generating revenue from product sales. We expect to continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future, and we anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially as we continue our development of, seek marketing approval for and potentially commercialize any of our product candidates, recruit and maintain key personnel and seek to identify, assess, acquire, in-license or develop additional product candidates.
The development of biopharmaceutical product candidates is capital-intensive. We expect our expenses to increase substantially in connection with our ongoing and planned activities, particularly as we conduct our ongoing and planned preclinical studies and clinical studies of aleniglipron, ACCG-2671, ANPA-0073, LTSE-2578LTSE-2578, ACCG-3535 and any future product candidates we may develop. Our expenses will increase substantially if ouras product candidates successfully complete early clinical and other studies, and also could increase beyond expectations if the FDA or foreign authorities require us to perform clinical and other studies in addition to those that we currently anticipate. Because the outcome of any clinical trial or preclinical study is highly uncertain, we cannot reasonably estimate the actual amounts necessary to successfully complete the development and commercialization of our product candidates. In addition, we have and expect to continue to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company. Furthermore, if we obtain marketing approval for our product candidates, we expect to incur significant expenses related to manufacturing, marketing, sales and distribution. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funding in connection with our continuing operations. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our research and development programs or any future commercialization efforts.
Based on our current operating plan, we believe that our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, as of December 31, 2024,2025, will be sufficient to fund our operatingprojected expensesoperations and key clinical milestones through atthe leastend 2027,of including2028. allThis plannedincludes costs related to the ongoing aleniglipron studiesACCESS forOLE, PhaseACCESS 3II readinessextension butstudy, excludingthe supplementary studies, and Phase 3 registrational studies.program in chronic weight management, but excludes additional costs related to pre-commercialization activities including commercial manufacturing. We have based these estimates on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could use our capital resources sooner than we currently expect. Our operating plan may change as a result of many factors currently unknown to us, and we may need to seek additional funds sooner than planned, through equity offerings, debt financings or other capital sources, including potentially grants, collaborations, licenses and other similar arrangements. Even if we believe we have sufficient capital for our current or future operating plans, we may seek additional capital if market conditions are favorable or if we have specific strategic considerations.
Any additional capital raising efforts may divert our management from their day-to-day activities, which may adversely affect our ability to develop and, if approved, commercialize our current and any future product candidates. Additional funding may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. As a result of actual or anticipated changes in interest rates, economic inflation and tariffs, changes in monetary and fiscal policy, U.S. political developments and other sources of instability, the impact of thevarious Russia/Ukraineglobal conflict and Israel-Hamas war,conflicts, the global credit and financial markets have experienced extreme volatility and disruptions, including severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, declines in consumer confidence, declines in economic growth, inflation, bank failures, trade wars, increases in unemployment rates, and uncertainty about economic stability. If the equity and credit markets deteriorate, including as a result of future bank failures, it may make any necessary debt or equity financing more difficult to obtain in a timely manner or on favorable terms, more costly or more dilutive.
Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenue, we expect to finance our operations through equity offerings, debt financings or other capital sources, including potentially grants, collaborations, licenses or other similar arrangements. For example, (i) in October 2023, we issued and sold an aggregate of 21,617,295 ordinary shares and 2,401,920 newly designated non-voting ordinary shares; (ii) in the Private Placement. In June 2024, we issued and sold an aggregate of 10,427,017 ADSs; (iii) in August 2025, we entered into a sales agreement (the Follow-On“ATM Offering.Sales Agreement”) with Leerink Partners LLC and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., pursuant to which we may offer and sell our ADSs up to an aggregate offering price of $250.0 million, and during the three months ended September 30, 2025, we sold 3,040,000 ADSs under the ATM Sales Agreement (as of December 31, 2025, approximately $191.5 million remained available for sale under the ATM Sales Agreement); and (iv) in December 2025, we issued and sold an aggregate of 9,961,538 ADSs and, in lieu of ADSs, pre-funded warrants to purchase ordinary shares represented by 1,538,462 ADSs. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership interest of our shareholders will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect the rights of our ADS holders. Debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as limitations on our ability to incur additional debt, make capital expenditures or declare dividends. If we raise funds through collaborations or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may be required to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us.
We are early in our development efforts and only have fourfive product candidates,candidates — aleniglipron, ACCG-2671, ANPA-0073ANPA-0073, LTSE-2578 and LTSE-2578,ACCG-3535 — in early clinical development. All of our other development programs are in the preclinical or discovery stage. If we are unable to advance our product candidates in clinical development, obtain regulatory approval and ultimately commercialize our product candidates, or experience significant delays in doing so, our business will be materially harmed.
We are in the early stages of our development efforts and have five product candidates, aleniglipron, ACCG-2671, ANPA-0073, LTSE-2578 and ACCG-3535, in early clinical development.
We are in the early stages of our development efforts and have four product candidates, aleniglipron, ACCG-2671, ANPA-0073 and LTSE-2578, in early clinical development. In June 2024, we reported positive topline data from our Phase 2a obesity study, in which aleniglipron demonstrated a clinically meaningful and statistically significant placebo-adjusted mean decrease in weight of 6.2% at 12 weeks (p<0.0001, using least-squares means (“LSM”) and analyzed based on the primary efficacy estimand using a mixed model for repeated measures) and demonstrated generally favorable safety and tolerability results following repeated, daily dosing up to 120 mg. Furthermore, we explored a new tablet formulation of aleniglipron in a capsule to tablet PK study, which demonstrated a placebo-adjusted mean weight loss of up to 6.9% with the tablet formulation at 12 weeks (p<0.0001, using LSM and analyzed based on the primary efficacy estimand using a mixed model for repeated measures). In July 2024, we submitted an IND to the FDA to support the initiation of a Phase 2b study in chronic weight management and received FDA allowance in August 2024. In the fourth quarter of 2024, we initiated the Phase 2b ACCESS study, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-range finding study of aleniglipron in approximately 220 adult participants living with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2), or overweight (BMI ≥ 27 kg/m2) with at least one weight-related comorbidity. Participants start at 5 mg of aleniglipron (or placebo) with a 4-week titration schedule, reaching target doses of 45 mg, 90 mg and 120 mg. The primary endpoint is percent change in body weight from baseline to week 36. Secondary endpoints include safety and tolerability of the monthly titration scheme, as well as PK of aleniglipron. In the fourth quarter of 2024, we initiated a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-range finding Phase 2 study of aleniglipron, known as ACCESS II, in approximately 82 adult participants living with obesity or overweight with at least one weight-related comorbidity. The study is designed to evaluate two higher doses of aleniglipron. Participants start at 5 mg of aleniglipron (or placebo) and follow a 4-week titration schedule up to target doses of 120 mg, 180 mg and 240 mg. In February 2025, we completed enrollment in the ACCESS and ACCESS II studies, and we expect to report topline data from both studies in the fourth quarter of 2025.
In June 2024, we initiated a Phase 1 clinical trial of LTSE-2578. The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled first-in-human clinical trial is designed to investigate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple ascending doses of LTSE-2578 in approximately 64 healthy participants and expect to report initial data in 2025.
Our other product candidates are still in the preclinical or discovery stages. We will need to progress earlyour product candidates through ongoing and planned clinical trials and progress our other current and future development programs through preclinical studies and submit INDs to the FDA or appropriate regulatory documents to applicable foreign authorities prior to initiating their clinical development. Our ability to generate product revenues, which we do not expect will occur for many years, if ever, will depend heavily on the successful development and eventual commercialization of our product candidates. The success of our product candidates will depend on several factors, including the following:
Clinical drug development is expensive and can take many years to complete, and its outcome is inherently uncertain. Our clinical studies may not be conducted as planned or completed on schedule, if at all, and failure can occur at any time during the preclinical study or clinical trial process. For example, we depend on the availability of non-human primates (“NHPs”) to conduct certain preclinical studies that we are required to complete prior to submitting an IND and initiating clinical development. There is currently a global shortage of NHPs available for drug development. This has caused the cost of obtaining NHPs for our preclinical studies to increase dramatically and, if the shortage continues, could also result in delays to our development timelines. Despite promising preclinical or clinical results, any product candidate can unexpectedly fail at any stage of preclinical or clinical development. The historical failure rate for product candidates in our industry is high. Furthermore, the results from clinical studies or preclinical studies of a product candidate may not predict the results of later clinical studies of the product candidate, and interim results of a clinical trial are not necessarily indicative of final results. For example, the preliminary topline nature of aleniglipron results andresults, the length of the study and sample size,size may render these results not necessarily indicative of the results for our future clinical studies for aleniglipron and may not be comparable to other weight loss products or product candidates, including other oral selective GLP-1RAs. In addition, given the size of the Phase 2a obesity cohort, the primary efficacy endpoint of weight loss was calculated using LSM and analyzed based on the primary efficacy estimand using a mixed model for repeated measures. This means that we drew on all available data, including data from patients that did not follow-up at 12 weeks. The model estimates how patients with missing data would have responded based on patients who continued the study and had similar baseline characteristics (implicit imputation). Product candidates in later stages of clinical studies may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy characteristics despite having progressed through preclinical studies and initial clinical studies. In particular, while we have conducted, or are conducting certain preclinical studies of our product candidates, the predictive value of these studies with respect to future testing in humans is limited, particularly in indications where animal models are less developed.
Even if our clinical studies are completed, the results may not be sufficient to obtain marketing approval for our product candidates. In clinical studies that are based on preclinical studies and early clinical studies, it is not uncommon to observe unexpected results, and many product candidates fail in clinical development despite very promising early results. Moreover, preclinical and clinical data may be susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses. A number of companies in the biopharmaceutical industry have suffered significant setbacks in clinical development even after achieving promising results in earlier studies. In addition, in some cases, external experts or regulatory authorities disagreed with such companies’ views and interpretations of the data and results from earlier preclinical studies or clinical studies. As we investigate aleniglipron and ACCG-2671 for obesity, ANPA-0073overweight and related conditions, ACCG-2671 and ACCG-3535 for selectiveobesity and muscle-sparingoverweight, weight loss,ANPA-0073 and LTSE-2578LTSE-2578, our product candidate for IPF, we may encounter new and unforeseen difficulties. Similarly, any future product candidates we may develop may not be able to progress from preclinical to Phase 1 clinical development. For the foregoing reasons, we cannot be certain that our ongoing and planned clinical studies and preclinical studies will be successful. Any of the foregoing occurrences may harm our business, financial condition and prospects significantly.
Any difficulties or delays in the commencement or completion, or termination or suspension, of our ongoing and planned clinical studies could result in increased costs to us, delay or limit our ability to generate revenue and adversely affect our commercial prospects.
In order to obtain FDA approval to market our product candidates, we must demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our product candidates in humans to the satisfaction of the FDA. To meet these requirements, we will have to conduct adequate and well-controlled clinical studies. In addition, before we can initiate clinical studies for any product candidate, we must submit the results of preclinical studies to the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities along with other information, including information about product candidate chemistry, manufacturing and controls and our proposed clinical trial protocol, as part of an IND or similar regulatory submission, and we are also required to submit comparable applications to foreign regulatory authorities for clinical studies outside of the United States. In July 2024, we submitted an IND to the FDA to support initiation of a Phase 2b study of aleniglipron in chronic weight management and received FDA allowance in August 2024. In the fourth quarter of 2024, we initiated the Phase 2b ACCESS study. We dosed the first patient in the ACCESS II study in the fourth quarter of 2024. We may be required to obtain additional FDA approval prior to evaluating aleniglipron at higher doses of 180 mg and 240 mg under our ACCESS II study. Since we have not previously tested these higher doses, we cannot be certain whether they have a favorable safety or tolerability profile. If we are unable to obtain such additional FDA approval, we may not be able to conduct our ACCESS II study as planned.
Further, conducting clinical studies in foreign countries, as we may do for our product candidates, presents additional risks that may delay completion of our clinical studies. These risks include the failure of enrolled patients in foreign countries to adhere to clinical protocols as a result of differences in healthcare services or cultural customs, managing additional administrative burdens associated with foreign regulatory requirements, as well as political, currency exchange and other economic risks relevant to such foreign countries. Investigators and patients may not be able to comply with clinical trial protocols if quarantines impede patient movement or interrupt healthcare services. Similarly, our ability to recruit and retain patients and principal investigators and site staff may be reduced, which in turn could adversely impact our clinical trial operations. Additionally, we may experience interruption of key clinical trial activities, such as clinical trial site monitoring, due to limitations on travel, quarantines or social distancing protocols imposed or recommended by federal or state governments, employers and others in connection with public health concerns. We have faced and may continue to face delays in meeting our anticipated timelines for our ongoing and planned clinical studies. We experienced delays in our patient enrollment and our supply chain as a direct result of COVID-19 on our suppliers’ ability to timely manufacture and ship certain supplies such as reagents and other lab consumables and due to the data collection omission at a clinical site as discussed above. These delays have previously impacted and could in the future adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.
Furthermore, our efforts to build relationships with patient communities may not succeed, which could result in delays in patient enrollment in our clinical studies. If we encounter any delays in enrolling such additional participants, this may further delay our clinical trial. In addition, any negative results we may report in clinical studies of our product candidate may make it difficult or impossible to recruit and retain patients in other clinical studies of that same product candidate. Delays or failures in planned patient enrollment or retention may result in increased costs, program delays or both, which could have a harmful effect on our ability to develop our product candidates, or could render further development impossible. For example, the impact of public health epidemics may delay or prevent patients from enrolling or from receiving treatment in accordance with the protocol and the required timelines, which could delay our clinical studies, or prevent us or our partners from completing our clinical studies at all, and harm our ability to obtain approval for such product candidate. Further, if patients drop out of our clinical studies, miss scheduled doses or follow-up visits, or otherwise fail to follow clinical trial protocols, the integrity of data from our clinical studies may be compromised or not accepted by the FDA or applicable foreign authorities, which would represent a significant setback for the applicable program. In addition, we may rely on CROs and clinical trial sites to ensure proper and timely conduct of our current and future clinical studies and, while we have entered and intend to enter into agreements governing their services, we will be limited in our ability to compel their actual performance. Such delays or failures could adversely affect our business, operating results and prospects.
Moreover, if any of our product candidates are associated with undesirable side effects in clinical studies or have characteristics that are unexpected, we may elect to abandon their development or limit their development to more narrow uses or subpopulations in which the undesirable side effects or other characteristics are less prevalent, less severe or more acceptable from a risk-benefit perspective, which may limit the commercial value for the product candidate if approved. We may also be required to modify our trial plans based on findings in our ongoing clinical studies. In our completed Phase 1 SAD and Phase 1b MAD study of aleniglipron, the following adverse events occurred and were considered probably or possibly related to the study drug: nausea, headache, vomiting, dehydration, decreased appetite, dizziness, and diarrhea. In our completed Phase 2a study of aleniglipron, the following adverse events occurred and were considered probably or possibly related to the study drug: nausea, headache, vomiting, decreased appetite, dyspepsia, and diarrhea. In our completed Phase 1 SAD and MAD study of ANPA-0073, the following adverse events occurred and were considered probably or possibly related to the study drug: blood creatine phosphokinase increase, dizziness, electrocardiogram T wave inversion, diarrhea, headache, lethargy, nausea, vomiting, chills, palpitations, and sinus tachycardia. However, further analysis may reveal AEs inconsistent with the safety results observed. Many compounds that initially showed promise in early-stage testing have later been found to cause side effects that prevented further development of the compound. In addition, regulatory authorities may draw different conclusions or require additional testing to confirm these determinations.
We are early in our development efforts for our product candidates, and we will need to successfully complete pivotal clinical studies in order to seek FDA or applicable foreign authority approval to market aleniglipron, ACCG-2671, ANPA-0073, LTSE-2578LTSE-2578, ACCG-3535 and any future product candidates we may develop. Carrying out clinical studies and the submission of NDAs is complicated. We have not conducted any later stage or pivotal clinical studies, have limited experience as a company in preparing, submitting and prosecuting regulatory filings and have not previously submitted an NDA or other applicable foreign regulatory submission for any product candidate. We also plan to conduct a number of clinical studies for multiple product candidates in parallel over the next several years. This may be a difficult process to manage with our limited resources and may divert the attention of management. In addition, we are currently planning for later stage interactions with FDA, and other foreign regulatory agencies; howeverhowever, we cannot guarantee timely or shift alignment on our clinical trial designs, phasePhase 3 dose rationale and overall size of the data base needed for any future marketing applications. Consequently, we may be unable to successfully and efficiently execute and complete necessary clinical studies in a way that leads to regulatory submission and approval of any of our product candidates. We may require more time and incur greater costs than our competitors and may not succeed in obtaining marketing approvals of product candidates that we develop. Failure to commence or complete, or delays in, our planned clinical studies, could prevent us from or delay us in submitting NDAs for and commercializing our product candidates.
We have conducted, or may plan to conduct, our initial clinical studies for aleniglipron, ACCG-2671, ANPA-0073, LTSE-2578LTSE-2578, ACCG-3535 and our other product candidates outside of the United States. However, the FDA and other foreign equivalents may not accept data from such studies, in which case our development plans will be delayed, which could materially harm our business.
We believe that clinical data generated in Australia and China or other foreign countries will be accepted by the FDA and its foreign equivalents outside of Australia; however, there can be no assurance the FDA or applicable foreign authorities will accept data from any other clinical studies that we may conduct in Australia, China or other foreign countries. If the FDA or applicable foreign authorities do not accept any such data, we would likely be required to conduct additional Phase 1 clinical studies, which would be costly and time consuming, and delay aspects of our development plan, which could harm our business.
International trade policies, including tariffs, sanctions and trade barriers may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
We operate in a global economy, which includes utilizing third-party suppliers in several countries outside the United States. There is inherent risk, based on the complex relationships among the United States and the countries in which we conduct our business, that political, diplomatic and national security factors can lead to global trade restrictions and changes in trade policies and export regulations that may adversely affect our business and operations. The current international trade and regulatory environment is subject to significant ongoing uncertainty including related legal challenges. The U.S. government has recently announced substantial new tariffs affecting a wide range of products and jurisdictions and has indicated an intention to continue developing new trade policies, including with respect to the pharmaceutical industry. In response, certain foreign governments have announced or implemented retaliatory tariffs and other protectionist measures. These developments have created a dynamic and unpredictable trade landscape, which may adversely impact our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. The Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, has initiated an investigation to determine whether pharmaceutical ingredients, including finished drug product, manufactured outside the United States pose a national security risk and should be subject to additional tariffs.
We do not own or operate, and currently have no plans to establish, any manufacturing facilities. We currently rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third parties for the manufacture of our product candidates for clinical testing, as well as for manufacture of any products that we may commercialize, if approved. Currently, the active pharmaceutical ingredients (“APIs”) and drug product are manufactured in China. We also rely on specialized laboratory equipment, supplies, materials and precursor compounds, all or part of which we believe may be ultimately sourced from multiple countries outside the United States, to advance our research and development efforts.
Current or future tariffs will result in increased research and development expenses, including with respect to increased costs associated with APIs and drug product. In addition, such tariffs will increase our supply chain complexity and could also potentially disrupt our existing supply chain. Unlike consumer goods, pharmaceuticals face unique regulatory constraints that make rapid supply chain adjustments particularly difficult and costly. Trade restrictions affecting the import of materials necessary for clinical trials could result in delays to our development timelines. Increased development costs and extended development timelines could place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to companies operating in regions with more favorable trade relationships and could reduce investor confidence, negatively impacting our ability to secure additional financing on favorable terms or at all. In addition, as we advance toward commercialization in the future, tariffs and trade restrictions could hinder our ability to establish cost-effective production capabilities, negatively impacting our growth prospects.
The complexity of announced or future tariffs may also increase the risk that we or our suppliers may be subject to civil or criminal enforcement actions in the United States or foreign jurisdictions related to compliance with trade regulations. Foreign governments may also adopt non-tariff measures, such as procurement preferences or informal disincentives to engage with, purchase from or invest in U.S. entities, which may limit our ability to compete internationally and attract non-U.S. investment, employees, customers and suppliers. Foreign governments may also take other retaliatory actions against U.S. entities, such as decreased intellectual property protection, increased enforcement actions or delays in regulatory approvals, which may result in heightened international legal and operational risks. In addition, the United States and other governments have imposed and may continue to impose additional sanctions, such as trade restrictions or trade barriers, which could restrict us from doing business directly or indirectly in or with certain countries or parties and may impose additional costs and complexity to our business.
Trade disputes, tariffs, restrictions and resulting legal challenges and other political tensions between the United States and other countries may also exacerbate unfavorable macroeconomic conditions including inflationary pressures, foreign exchange volatility, financial market instability, and economic recessions or downturns. The ultimate impact of current or future tariffs and trade restrictions and resulting legal challenges remains uncertain and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and prospects. While we actively monitor these risks, any prolonged economic downturn, escalation in trade tensions, or deterioration in international perception of U.S.-based companies could materially and adversely affect our business, ability to access the capital markets or other financing sources, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. In addition, trade developments have and may continue to heighten the risks related to the other risk factors described elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Disruptions to the operations of the FDA, the SEC, other U.S. governmental agencies or comparable foreign regulatory authorities caused by funding shortages, leadership changes, staffing cuts or other staffing shortages, along with uncertainty regarding the potential for new initiatives, laws, regulations, policies and guidance affecting our product candidates or other aspects of our business, could materially and adversely affect our business.
Disruptions at the FDA and other government agencies caused by funding shortages or global health concerns could hinder their ability to hire, retain or deploy key leadership and other personnel, or otherwise prevent new or modified products from being developed, approved or commercialized in a timely manner or at all, which could negatively impact our business.
The ability of the FDA andor applicableother comparable foreign regulatory authorities to review and approve new products or take action with respect to other regulatory matters can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, leadership changes, the ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees, andthe statutory,availability regulatory,of personnel and policyother changes.resources, changes in statutes, regulations and policies that affect the FDA’s or comparable foreign regulatory authorities’ ability to perform routine functions, and other business disruptions. Average review times at the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities have fluctuated in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of the SEC and other government agencies on which our operations may rely, including those that fund research and development activitiesactivities, is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable.
Over the last several years, the U.S. government has shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA and the SEC, have had to furlough critical FDA, SEC and other government employees and stop critical activities. In addition, there have recently been terminations of large numbers of federal employees at various federal agencies, including the FDA. Changes and cuts in FDA staffing could result in delays in the FDA’s responsiveness or in its ability to review IND submissions or applications, issue regulations or guidance, or implement or enforce regulatory requirements in a timely fashion, or at all. A prolonged government shutdown and/or employee terminations or resignations could significantly impact the ability of the FDA or other federal agencies to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, future government shutdowns and/or employee terminations or resignations at the SEC could impact our ability to access the public markets and obtain necessary capital in order to properly capitalize and continue our operations.
There is substantial uncertainty as to whether and how the current administration will seek to modify or revise the requirements and policies of the FDA and other regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over our product candidates and any products for which we obtain approval. This uncertainty could present new challenges as we navigate development and approval of our product candidates. Some of these efforts have manifested to date in the form of personnel cuts and measures that could impact the FDA’s ability to hire and retain key personnel, which could result in delays or limitations on our ability to obtain guidance from the FDA on our product candidates in development and obtain the requisite regulatory approvals in the future. There is uncertainty as to whether we will be materially and negatively impacted by governmental orders, regulations, policies or guidance, or disruptions to the normal operations of government agencies.
Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time necessary for new drugs to be reviewed and/or approved by necessary government agencies, which would adversely affect our business. For example, over the last several years, the U.S. government shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, furloughed critical employees and ceased critical activities. More recently, such agencies, including the FDA, have conducted layoffs and may, from time to time, conduct additional layoffs. If a prolonged government shutdown or significant layoffs occur, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA and applicable foreign authorities to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, or if global health concerns prevent the FDA or applicable foreign authorities from conducting their regular inspections, reviews, or other regulatory activities, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA or applicable foreign authorities to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We do not own or operate manufacturing facilities and have no plans to build our own clinical or commercial scale manufacturing capabilities. We rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third parties for the manufacture of our product candidates and related raw materials for preclinical and clinical development, as well as for commercial manufacture if any of our product candidates receive marketing approval. This reliance increases the risk that we will not have sufficient quantities of our product candidates or products, if approved, or such quantities at an acceptable cost or quality, which could delay, prevent or impair our development or commercialization efforts. Our active pharmaceutical ingredientsAPIs and drug product for our product candidates are currently provided by a supplier, WuXi STA, a subsidiary of WuXi AppTec, and we expect to rely on this supplier for the foreseeable future. Contract manufacturing organizations may become subject to legislation, trade restrictions, sanctions, and other regulatory requirements by the U.S. government, which could restrict or even prohibit our ability to work with such entities, thereby potentially disrupting the supply of material to us. For example, theon HouseDecember of18, Representatives of2025, the priorNational CongressDefense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026 (the 118th Congress“NDAA”) passedwas signed into law, which includes the BIOSECURE Act,Act whichthat proposedprohibits prohibitingthe U.S. government from procuring biotechnology equipment or services from “biotechnology companies of concern,” and would prohibit U.S. government contracts, grants,loans and loansgrants to entitiesany entity that useuses biotechnology equipment andor services from certaina nameddesignated Chinese“biotechnology biotechcompany companies,of whichconcern.” currently“Biotechnology company of concern” is defined under the BIOSECURE Act as an entity that is subject to the administrative governance structure, direction, control, or operates on behalf of a foreign adversary, is involved in the manufacture, distribution, provision, or procurement of a biotechnology equipment or service, and poses a risk to national security based on engagement with, being supported by, or being affiliated with a foreign adversary’s military, internal security forces, or intelligence agencies and its research or multiomic data collection (e.g., collection of genomic information). “Biotechnology companies of concern” include WuXicompanies AppTecidentified on the U.S. Department of Defense’s “Chinese military companies operating in the United States” list (the “1260H List”) and WuXi Biologics and certain of their respective subsidiaries and affiliates, andalso authorizes the U.S. government to includeidentify additional Chineseentities for inclusion as “biotechnology companies of concern.” This version ofWith the BIOSECURE ActAct, includedwe may be restricted in our ability to work with certain Chinese biotechnology manufacturing companies to the extent we would contract with, or otherwise receive funding from, the U.S. government. In addition, if we, our suppliers, or our customers were to be designated as a grandfathering provision allowing “biotechnology equipmentcompany of concern,”, this could potentially cause harm to our business and servicesfinancial providedcondition. orIn producedaddition, by named biotechnology companies of concern under a contract or agreement entered into before the effective date until January 1, 2032. The BIOSECURE Act did not become law in the 118th Congress. It is unclear whether the current Congress (the 119th Congress) will introduce the BIOSECURE Actor similar legislation in this congressional session and, if so, how the scope, prohibitions, or designated biotechnology companies of concern may differ from the version of the BIOSECURE Act passed by the House in the prior 118th Congress. Anyany U.S. executive action, legislative action or potential sanctions with China could materially impact entities that work with Chinese biotechnology companies. U.S. executive agencies have the ability tomay designate entities and individuals on various governmental prohibited and restricted parties lists. Depending on the designation, potential consequences can range from a comprehensive prohibition on all transactions or dealings with designated parties, or a limited prohibition on certain types of activities, such as exports and financing activities, with designated parties. Such disruption could have adverse effects on the development of our product candidates. We have contracted with, or are in the process of pursuing contracts with, alternative suppliers or manufacturers outside of China for our active pharmaceutical ingredientsAPIs and drug product for our product candidates. While we believe that our current manufacturing plan will provide us with alternative sources for such supplies, there is a risk that, if supplies are interrupted, or the quality of ingredients provided by such alternative sources is not to our specification, it would cause delays in our supply chain and increase the cost of manufacturing our drugs, which could materially harm our business.
We and our CROs will be required to comply with the good laboratory practices (“GLPs”),practices, and GCPs, which are regulations and guidelines enforced by the FDA and applicable foreign authorities in the form of International Conference on Harmonization guidelines for any of our product candidates that are in preclinical and clinical development. The regulatory authorities enforce GCPs through periodic inspections of trial sponsors, principal investigators and clinical trial sites. Although we will rely on CROs to conduct GLP-compliantgood laboratory practices-compliant preclinical studies and GCP-compliant clinical studies, we remain responsible for ensuring that each of our GLPgood laboratory practices preclinical studies and clinical studies is conducted in accordance with its investigational plan and protocol and applicable laws and regulations, and our reliance on the CROs does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. If we or our CROs fail to comply with GCPs, the clinical data generated in our clinical studies may be deemed unreliable and the FDA or applicable foreign authorities may require us to perform additional clinical studies before approving our marketing applications. For example, in September 2023, we announced that topline data from the obesity cohort of our Phase 2a trial of aleniglipron would be delayed because of a data collection omission by a clinical site, where weight was not collected at the final (week 12) visit for 24 of the 40 enrolled participants. Accordingly, if our CROs fail to comply with these regulations or fail to recruit a sufficient number of participants or ensure the collection of requisite data by clinical sites, we may be required to enroll additional participants or repeat clinical studies, which would delay the marketing approval process.
Our existing discovery collaborations with Schrödinger, LLC (together with its affiliates, “Schrödinger”) are important to our business. If we are unable to maintain these collaborations, or if these collaborations are not successful, our business could be adversely affected.
In October 2020, Lhotse,Lhotse Bio, Inc. (“Lhotse”), our wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into a collaboration agreement (the “Lhotse-Schrödinger Agreement.Agreement”) with Schrödinger LLC. In November 2023, Aconcagua,Aconcagua Bio, Inc. (“Aconcagua”), our wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into a collaboration agreement (the Aconcagua-Schrödinger“Aconcagua- Agreement.Schrödinger Agreement”) with Schrödinger. Under both agreements, Schrödinger uses its technology platform to perform virtual screens of members of the target class of human integrins, and we and Schrödinger collaborate to facilitate prioritization of targets, perform target validation and analysis, identify leads and perform lead optimization. Schrödinger has granted us an exclusive license to certain intellectual property related to our product candidates discovered under both agreements. See the discussion in Part I. Item 1. “Business—Lhotse Collaboration Agreement with Schrödinger, LLC” and Part I. Item 1. “Business—Aconcagua Collaboration Agreement with Schrödinger, Inc.” of this Annual Report.Report for additional information.
Further, AI presents additional risks and challenges, especially as the use of these technologies becomes more important to our operations over time. Generative AI may be used improperly or inappropriately which could lead to the tainting of our proprietary information and render us unable to qualify for patent protection. Their use by people, including our vendors, employees, suppliers and contractors, with access to our proprietary and confidential information, including trade secrets, may continue to increase and may lead to the release of such information, which may impact our ability to realize the benefit of our intellectual property. Our use of generative AI platforms may lead to novel and urgent cybersecurity risks, which may adversely affect our operations and reputation, as well as the operations of any third-party collaborators. Emerging ethical issues surround the use of AI, and we may be subject to reputational and legal risk if our deployment or use of AI becomes controversial. Regulators could limit our, or any third-party collaborator’s ability to develop or implement AI-based technologies as part of measures taken against us or any third-party collaborators in particular or as a consequence of broader legislation, which could have an adverse effect on our or any third-party collaborators’ business, results of operations and financial conditions. Several jurisdictions around the globe, including Europe and certain U.S. states, have proposed, enacted, or are considering laws governing the development and use of AI/Machine Learning, such as the EU’s AI Act and the Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act. For example, the EU AI Act sets out a risk-based framework, subjecting certain AI technologies to numerous compliance obligations, including transparency, conformity and risk assessment, monitoring and human oversight requirements. Under the EU AI Act, non-compliant companies may be subject to administrative fines of up to 35 million Euros or 7% of a company’s total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is the higher. Certain of our activities subject us to the EU AI Act and depending on how the EU AI Act is implemented and interpreted, we may have to adapt our business practices, contractual arrangements, and services to comply with such obligations. We expect other jurisdictions will adopt similar laws. Uncertainty in the legal regulatory regime may require significant resources to modify and maintain business practices to comply with U.S. and non-U.S. laws, the nature of which cannot be determined at this time.
The FDA’s policies, and those of equivalent foreign regulatory agencies, may change and additional government regulations may be enacted that could cause changes to or delays in the drug review process, or suspend or restrict marketing approval of our product candidates. For example, the U.S. Supreme Court’s June 2024 decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo overturned the longstanding Chevron doctrine, under which courts were required to give deference to regulatory agencies’ reasonable interpretations of ambiguous federal statutes.statutes (the “Loper decision”). The Loper decision could result in additional legal challenges to regulations and decisions issued by federal agencies, including the FDA, on which we rely. Any such legal challenges, if successful, could have a material impact on our business. Additionally, the Loper decision may result in increased regulatory uncertainty, inconsistent judicial interpretations, and other impacts to the agency rulemaking process, any of which could adversely impact our business and operations. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may be subject to enforcement action and we may not achieve or sustain profitability, which would harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
A primary trend in the U.S. healthcare industry and elsewhere is cost containment. For example, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) imposes rebates on many Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D products to penalize price increases that outpace inflation on an annual basis. In addition, HHS has been empowered to negotiate the price to negotiate the price of certain single-source drugs that have been on the market for at least seven (7) years covered under Medicare as part of the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program. Each year up to twenty (20) products will be selected by HHS for the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program. Products subject to the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program are expected to experience a significant reduction in reimbursement from the Medicare program on a per unit basis. If coverage and adequate reimbursement are not available, or are available only to limited levels, we may not be able to successfully commercialize our current and any future product candidates that we develop, which could have an adverse effect on our operating results and our overall financial condition.
A primary trend in the U.S. healthcare industry and elsewhere is cost containment. Third-party payors have also attempted to control costs by limiting coverage and the amount of reimbursement for particular medications. We cannot be sure that coverage and reimbursement will be available for any drug that we commercialize and, if reimbursement is available, what the level of reimbursement will be. Inadequate coverage and reimbursement may impact the demand for, or the price of, any drug for which we obtain marketing approval. If coverage and adequate reimbursement are not available, or are available only to limited levels, we may not be able to successfully commercialize our current and any future product candidates that we develop, which could have an adverse effect on our operating results and our overall financial condition. Further, coverage policies and third-party payor reimbursement rates may change at any time. Therefore, even if favorable coverage and reimbursement status is attained for one or more products for which we receive marketing approval, less favorable coverage policies and reimbursement rates may be implemented in the future.
We are aware of GLP-1R small molecules in development by Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Qilu Regor Therapeutics, AstraZeneca/Eccogene, Terns Pharmaceuticals, Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine, Huadong, Sciwind Biosciences, Ascletis, Gilead, Kallyope, MindRank, vTv Therapeutics, Carmot Therapeutics (acquired by Roche Group in January 2024) and Kailera Therapeutics, formerly Hercules CM Newco (licensed HRS-7535, an oral small molecule GLP-1; HRS-9531 a GLP-1/GIP; and preclinical asset HRS-4729 from Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine). We have granted Genentech, Inc. and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd (collectively “GNE”) a non-exclusive license to and covenant that we will not assert certain of our patents with respect to the exploitation of CT-996, a GLP-1R small molecule being developed by GNE following its acquisition of Carmot Therapeutics. We will not be able to utilize these patent rights to prevent the commercialization of this competitive molecule if it is successfully developed but we will be eligible for royalties on its sale in patented countries. There are currently approved GLP-1R peptides for the treatment of diabetes and obesity marketed by Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Sanofi and Kailera Therapeutics, formerly Hercules CM Newco. We are also aware of other GLP-1R plus dual/tri incretin targeting peptides in development by Eli Lilly, Jiangsu Hansoh Pharmaceutical Group, Boehringer Ingelheim, Altimmune, Carmot Therapeutics, Sciwind Biosciences, Novo Nordisk, Viking Therapeutics, Amgen, Merck, Zealand Pharma, D&D Pharmatech, GMAX Biopharma, Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine, BrightGene, Innovent Biologics, PegBio, NeuroBo Pharmaceuticals, Hanmi Phamaceuticals,Pharmaceuticals, Progen Holdings, Pep2Tango, Metsera,Metsera (acquired by Pfizer in November 2025), QL Biopharma, Lexaria Bioscience, Sun Pharmaceutical, Gan & Lee, InnogenInnogen, Biomed Industries, Verdiva Bio and BiomedAscletis. Industries.Despite significant biopharmaceutical industry investment, no oral small molecule therapy targeting amylin has been approved for the treatment of diabetes or obesity. We are aware of amylin small molecules in preclinical development by: Eli Lilly, Eccogene, Nxera, Iktos/Cube Biotech strategic collaboration, Alveus Therapeutics and Ambrosia Biosciences. Additionally, we are aware of APJ receptor targeted product candidates in development for COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome by CohBar, Inc.; IPF, systemic sclerosis interstitial lung disease, and kidney nephrotic syndrome by Apie Therapeutics; and muscle atrophy by BioAge Labs, Inc. Both Amgen and Bristol Myers Squibb (“BMS”) have APJ receptor targeted product candidates for heart failure. Furthermore, we are aware of LPA1R targeted product candidates in development for IPF by BMS, Horizon Therapeutics (acquired by Amgen in October 2023) and DJS Antibodies; and myelin restoration and neuroinflammation by Contineum Therapeutics.
We conduct certain research and development operations through our Australian wholly-owned subsidiaries. If we lose our ability to operate in Australia, or if any of our subsidiaries are unable to receive the research and development tax credit allowed by Australian regulations, or are required to refund any research and development tax credit previously received or reserve for such credit in our financial statements, our business and results of operations could suffer.
If our operations are found to be in violation of any of these laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, imprisonment, exclusion from participation in government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, additional reporting requirements and oversight if we become subject to a corporate integrity agreement or similar agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance with these laws and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations.
Since its enactment, there have been judicial, congressional and executive branch challenges and amendments to certain aspects of the ACA. For example, on July 4, 2025, the annual reconciliation bill, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”) was signed into law which narrows access to ACA marketplace exchange enrollment and declines to extend the ACA enhanced advanced premium tax credits that expired at the end of 2025, which, among other provisions in the law, are anticipated to reduce the number of Americans with health insurance. The OBBBA is also expected to reduce Medicaid spending and enrollment by implementing work requirements for some beneficiaries, capping state-directed payments, reducing federal funding, and limiting provider taxes used to fund the program. In addition, regional healthcare authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical products and which suppliers will be included in their prescription drug and other healthcare programs. We expect that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future.
The current Trump administration is pursuing policies to reduce regulations and expenditures across government including at HHS, the FDA, CMS and related agencies. For example, the current administration has announced agreements with pharmaceutical companies that require the drug manufacturers to offer, through a direct to consumer platform, U.S. patients and Medicaid programs prescription drug Most-Favored Nation pricing equal to or lower than those paid in other developed nations, with additional mandates for direct-to-patient discounts and repatriation of foreign revenues. Other recent actions include, for example, (1) directing agencies to reduce workforce and cut programs; (2) directing HHS and other agencies to lower prescription drug costs through a variety of initiatives, including by improving upon the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program and establishing Most-Favored-Nation pricing for pharmaceutical products; (3) imposing tariffs of imported pharmaceutical products; and (4) as part of the Make America Healthy Again Commission’s Strategy Report released in September 2025, working across government agencies to increase enforcement on direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising. These actions and policies may significantly reduce U.S. drug prices, potentially impacting manufacturers’ global pricing strategies and profitability, while increasing their operational costs and compliance risks. In June 2024, the Loper decision greatly reduced judicial deference to regulatory agencies, which could increase successful legal challenges to federal regulations affecting our operations. Additionally, Congress may introduce and ultimately pass health care related legislation that could impact the drug approval process and make changes to the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program created under the IRA.
Since its enactment, there have been judicial, Congressional and executive branch challenges and amendments to certain aspects of the ACA. For example, on August 16, 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (“IRA”) was signed into law, which among other things, extends enhanced subsidies for individuals purchasing health insurance coverage in ACA marketplaces through plan year 2025. The IRA also eliminates the “donut hole” under the Medicare Part D program beginning in 2025 by significantly lowering the beneficiary maximum out-of-pocket cost and through a newly established manufacturer discount program. It is possible the ACA will be subject to judicial or Congressional challenges and amendments in the future.
Also, there has been heightened governmental scrutiny recently over the manner in which drug manufacturers set prices for their marketed products, which have resulted in several Congressional inquiries, presidential executive orders, and proposed and enacted federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to product pricing, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for drug products. For example, the IRA, among other things, (1) directs the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) to negotiate the price of certain high-expenditure, single-source drugs covered under Medicare that have been on the market for at least 7 years (the “Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program”) and (2) imposes rebates under Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D to penalize price increases that outpace inflation. These provisions began to effect progressively in fiscal year 2023. On August 15, 2024, HHS announced the agreed-upon reimbursement prices of the first ten drugs that were subject to price negotiations, although the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program is currently subject to legal challenges. HHS will select up to fifteen additional drugs covered under Part D for price negotiation in 2025. Each year thereafter more Part B and Part D products will become subject to the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program. Further, on December 7, 2023, an initiative to control the price of prescription drugs through the use of march-in rights under the Bayh-Dole Act was announced. On December 8, 2023, the National Institute of Standards and Technology published for comment a Draft Interagency Guidance Framework for Considering the Exercise of March-In Rights which for the first time includes the price of a product as one factor an agency can use when deciding to exercise march-in rights. While march-in rights have not previously been exercised, it is uncertain if that will continue under the new framework.
Individual states in the United States have also become increasingly active in passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. For example, on January 5, 2024, the FDA approved Florida’s Section 804 Importation Program (“SIP”) proposal to import certain drugs from Canada for specific state healthcare programs. It is unclear how this program will be implemented, including which drugs will be chosen, and whether it will be subject to legal challenges in the United States or Canada. Other states have also submitted SIP proposals that are pending review by the FDA. In addition, regional healthcare authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical products and which suppliers will be included in their prescription drug and other healthcare programs. We expect that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future.
We cannot predict what healthcare reform initiatives may be adopted in the future, particularly in light of the recent U.S. presidential and Congressional elections.future. We expect that these and other healthcare reform measures that may be adopted in the future, may result in more rigorous coverage criteria and additional downward pressure on the price that we receive for any approved drug. Any reduction in reimbursement from Medicare or other government programs may result in a similar reduction in payments from private payors. The implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms may prevent us from being able to generate revenue, attain profitability, or commercialize our drugs.
Threat actors also direct significant disruptions of, or cyber incidents at, our or our third-party vendors’ and/or business partners’ information technology systems that could adversely affect our business operations and/or result in the loss, misappropriation, and/or unauthorized access, use or disclosure of, or the prevention of access to, sensitive information, which could result in a variety of adverse effects, including financial, legal, regulatory, business and reputational harm to us. In addition, information technology system disruptions, whether from attacks on our technology environment or from computer viruses, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication and electrical failures, could result in a material disruption of our development programs and our business operations. For example, the loss of clinical trial data from completed or future clinical studies could result in delays in our marketing approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the data. Additionally, theft of our intellectual property or proprietary business information would require substantial expenditures to remedy. If we or our third-party collaborators, consultants, contractors, suppliers, vendors or service providers were to suffer an actual or likely attack or breach, for example, that involves the unauthorized access to or use or disclosure of personal or health information for which we are responsible may require us, we may have to notify consumers, partners, collaborators, government authorities, and the media, and may be subject to investigations, civil penalties, administrative and enforcement actions (including mandatory corrective action or requirements to verify the correctness of database contents), and consuming, distracting and expensive litigation, any of which could result in increased costs to us, and result in significant legal and financial exposure, or other harm to our business and reputation.
We and certain of our service providers arehave fromin timethe topast timeand may in the future be subject to cyberattacks and security incidents. For example, in September 2025 we became aware of a security incident that involved unauthorized access to a SharePoint folder, which contained a single file. Available evidence indicates that the file was not accessed or downloaded. It may be difficult and/or costly to detect, investigate, mitigate, contain, and remediate a security incident. Our efforts to do so may not be successful. Actions taken by us or the third parties with whom we work to detect, investigate, mitigate, contain, and remediate a security incident could result in outages, data losses, and disruptions of our business. Threat actors may also gain access to other networks and systems after a compromise of our networks and systems. While we have implemented security measures intended to protect our information technology systems and infrastructure, such measures may not successfully prevent service interruptions or security incidents.
We take steps designed to detect, mitigate, and remediate vulnerabilities in our information systems (such as our hardware and/or software, including that of third parties with whom we work). We have not and may not,not in the future, however, detect and remediate all such vulnerabilities including on a timely basis. Further, we have and may experience delays in developing and deploying remedial measures and patches designed to address identified vulnerabilities.
We conduct certain research and development operations through our Australian wholly-owned subsidiaries. We have voluntarily refunded a research and development tax credit previously received under Australian regulations. If we lose our ability to operate in Australia, or if any of our subsidiaries are unable to receive the research and development tax credit allowed by Australian regulations, or are required to refund any research and development tax credit previously received or reserve for such credit in our financial statements, our business and results of operations could suffer.
We and the third parties with whom we work are subject to stringent and evolving U.S. and foreign laws, regulations, rules, industry standards, contractual obligations, policies and other obligations related to data security and privacy. Our or the third parties with whom we work (including our suppliers) actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could lead to government enforcement actions, which could include civil, criminal or administrative penalties, litigation (including class claims) and arbitration demands, fines and penalties, disruptions of our business operations, reputational harm, adverse publicity, and other adverse business consequences, and could negatively affect our operating results and business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects, and other adverse business consequences and could negatively affect our operating results and business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
In the past few years, numerous U.S. states—including California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and Utah—have enacted comprehensive privacy laws that impose certain obligations on covered businesses, including providing specific disclosures in privacy notices and affording residents with certain rights concerning their personal data. As applicable, such rights may include the right to access, correct, or delete certain personal data, and to opt-out of certain data processing activities, such as targeted advertising, profiling, and automated decision-making. The exercise of these rights may impact our business and ability to provide our products and services.
Certain states also impose stricter requirements for processing certain personal data, including sensitive information, such as conducting data privacy impact assessments. These state laws allow for statutory fines for noncompliance. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 (“CPRA”),2020, (collectively, “CCPA”) applies to personal data of consumers, business representatives, and employees who are California residents, and requires businesses to provide specific disclosures in privacy notices and honor requests of such individuals to exercise certain privacy rights. The CCPA provides for fines of up to $7,500 per intentional violation and allows private litigants affected by certain data breaches to recover significant statutory damages. Although the CCPA exempts some data processed in the context of clinical studies, the CCPA increases compliance costs and potential liability with respect to other personal data we maintain about California residents. Similar laws are being considered in several other states, as well as at the federal and local levels, and we expect more states to pass similar laws in the future. While these states, like the CCPA, also exempt some data processed in the context of clinical studies, these developments further complicate compliance efforts, and increase legal risk and compliance costs for us, the third parties upon whom we rely.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations for 2025 as compared to 2024 are discussed below and should be read in conjunction with our audited Consolidated Financial Statements, including the notes thereto. For a discussion of our financial condition and results of operations for 2024 as compared to 2023, except as set forth below, please refer to Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which discussion is incorporated by reference herein.”
New heading “Other License Income”
New heading “Gains on Sale of Non-financial Assets”
New heading “Other License Income”
New heading “Gains on Sale of Non-financial Assets”
New heading “Sources of Funds”
New heading “Initial Public Offering”
New heading “Private Placement”
New heading “2024 Follow-On Offering”
New heading “At-the-Market Offering”
New heading “2025 Follow-On Offering”
Largest changes
Although we did not see a significant financial impact to our business operations as a result of recent geopolitical and macroeconomic developments, such as recent and potential future disruptions in access to bank deposits or lending commitments due to bank failures, tariffs, global pandemics, geopolitical tensions between thesee in full comparisonU.S.United States and China,the ongoing Russia/Ukraine conflictandthevariousIsrael-Hamasglobalwarconflicts for the year ended December 31,2024,2025, there may be potential impacts to our business in the future that are highly uncertain and difficult to predict, including our ability to raise additional funds, disruptions to the supply chain and the manufacture or shipment of drug substances and finished drug products for our product candidates for use in our research, preclinical studies and clinical studies, impediments to our clinical trial initiation and recruitment, errors or omissions at our clinical sites and the ability of patients to continue in clinical studies, delays in the FDA’s review and approvalprocesses,processes including as a result of recent layoffs, our ability to effectively operate across different geographies in which our offices are located,continuedany increases in interest rates and economic inflation, bank failures, the impact on the global economy due tothevariousRussia/Ukraineglobalconflict and Israel-Hamas war,conflicts, higher prices of supplies, tariffs, changes in monetary and fiscal policy, U.S. political developments and other sources of instability and changes in availability and cost of credit and our ability to access capital. The ultimate impact of these geopolitical and macroeconomic factors, as well as any lasting effects on the way we conduct our business, is highly uncertain and subject to continued change, and we recognize that they may continue to present unique challenges for us.
“Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations for 2025 as compared to 2024 are discussed below and should be read in conjunction with our audited Consolidated Financial Statements, including the notes thereto. For a discussion of our financial condition and results of operations for 2024 as compared to 2023, except as set forth below, please refer to Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which discussion is incorporated by reference herein.”see in full comparison
“We expect to continue to incur significant and increasing expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future, particularly if and as we continue to invest in our research and development activities and initiate additional clinical studies, expand our product pipeline, hire additional personnel and invest in and grow our business, maintain, expand and protect our intellectual property portfolio, and seek regulatory approvals for and commercialize any approved product candidates. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (48)
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations for 2025 as compared to 2024 are discussed below and should be read in conjunction with our audited Consolidated Financial Statements, including the notes thereto. For a discussion of our financial condition and results of operations for 2024 as compared to 2023, except as set forth below, please refer to Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which discussion is incorporated by reference herein.
Our most advanced product candidate to date is aleniglipron, also known as GSBR-1290, an oral small molecule selective glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor (“GLP-1R”) agonist currently in five ongoing clinical studies for the treatment of obesity, overweight and related conditions. We have two oral small molecule amylin receptor agonists: ACCG-2671 which is currently in Phase 1 clinical development and ACCG-3535, which we have selected as our second amylin development candidate. Our obesity pipeline also includes multiple preclinical discovery stage small molecules targeting glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon receptors. Importantly, these programs have the potential to be developed as monotherapy as well as in fixed dose combination with our backbone GLP-1 or amylin development candidates. These combination products enable us to potentially address diseases beyond obesity including type 2 diabetes mellitus, heart failure, sleep apnea, chronic kidney disease, osteoarthritis, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and potentially even addiction and Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease, areas where we are starting to see encouraging data with GLP-1Rs. Our product candidates, as oral small molecules, have the potential to be more accessible medicines than biologics and peptide therapies with potentially differentiated efficacy and safety and, from a manufacturing standpoint, more scalable to meet global demand.
We are a Cayman Islands exempted company incorporated with limited liability. We were initially formed as a Delaware limited liability company in 2016 under the name ShouTi Inc., and reorganized as a Cayman Islands exempted company in February 2019. Our primary activities to date have included organizing and staffing our company, business and scientific planning, raising capital, conducting research and development activities, entering into strategic and corporate structuring transactions, enabling manufacturing activities in support of our product candidate development efforts, and establishing our intellectual property portfolio, and providing general and administrative support for these activities. We do not have any product candidates approved for sale and have not generated any revenue from our products. Since our inception, we have incurred net operating losses and negative cash flows from operations. We had net losses of $141.2 million, $122.5 million and $89.6 million in the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $329.1$470.3 million. Historically, prior to our IPO, we have financed our operations primarily through the private placement of equity securities.
In February 2023, we completed our initial public offering (“IPO”) of our American depositary shares (“ADSs”), in which we issued and sold an aggregate of 12,351,000 ADSs (inclusive of 1,611,000 ADSs pursuant to the exercise by the underwriters of their option) at a price of $15.00 per ADS for net cash proceeds of approximately $166.7 million, net of underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering costs. Upon the closing of the IPO, all outstanding shares of redeemable convertible preferred shares automatically converted into 67,018,087 ordinary shares. Subsequent to the closing of the IPO, there were no shares of redeemable convertible preferred shares outstanding. In September 2023, we entered into a share purchase agreement with certain institutional investors (the “Purchasers”), pursuant to which we agreed to sell and issue to the Purchasers an aggregate of 21,617,295 ordinary shares and 2,401,920 newly designated non-voting ordinary shares at a purchase price of $12.49 per share (or the equivalent of $37.47 per ADS), the closing price of our ADS on the Nasdaq Global Market on September 28, 2023 (the “Private Placement”). We completed the Private Placement in October 2023 and received approximately $281.5 million in net proceeds after deducting placement agent fees and other private placement expenses. In June 2024, we issued and sold 10,427,017 ADSs, including the full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares, and received $512.7 million in net proceeds, after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses (the “Follow-On Offering”).
As of December 31, 2024,2025, we have cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of $883.5$1,446.2 million. Based on our current business plan, we estimate that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments will be sufficient to fund our projected operations and key clinical milestones through atthe leastend 2027,of including2028. allThis includes costs related to the ongoing aleniglipron studiesACCESS forOLE, PhaseACCESS 3II readinessextension butstudy, excludingthe supplementary studies, and Phase 3 registrational studies.program in chronic weight management, but excludes additional costs related to pre-commercialization activities including commercial manufacturing. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we may exhaust our available capital resources sooner than we expect.
We expect to continue to incur significant and increasing expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future, particularly if and as we continue to invest in our research and development activities and initiate additional clinical studies, expand our product pipeline, hire additional personnel and invest in and grow our business, maintain, expand and protect our intellectual property portfolio, and seek regulatory approvals for and commercialize any approved product candidates. In addition, we have incurred and expect to continue to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company, including significant legal, audit, accounting, regulatory, consulting, and tax-related services associated with being a public company, compliance with Nasdaq listing and SEC requirements, director and officer insurance premiums and investor relations costs that we did not incur as a private company. As a result, we will need substantial additional capital to develop our product candidates, including to fund Phase 3 clinical studies of aleniglipron, and fund operations for the foreseeable future. Moreover, we may in the future seek to acquire or invest in additional businesses, products, or technologies that we believe could complement or enhance our products, enhance our technical capabilities or otherwise offer growth opportunities, although we currently have no agreements or understandings with respect to any such acquisitions or investments. Until such time as we can generate significant revenue from our products, if ever, we expect to finance our operations through the public or private sale of equity, government or private party grants, debt financings or other capital sources, including potential collaborations with other companies or other strategic transactions. If we are unable to obtain additional funding, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate some or all of our research and development programs, product portfolio expansion or any commercialization efforts, which could adversely affect our business prospects, or we may be unable to continue operations. If we raise funds through strategic collaborations or other similar arrangements with third-parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our platform technology, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates or may have to grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us and/or may reduce the value of our ordinary shares. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with product development, we cannot predict the timing or amount of increased expenses or when or if we will be able to achieve or maintain profitability.
Although we did not see a significant financial impact to our business operations as a result of recent geopolitical and macroeconomic developments, such as recent and potential future disruptions in access to bank deposits or lending commitments due to bank failures, tariffs, global pandemics, geopolitical tensions between the U.S.United States and China, the ongoing Russia/Ukraine conflict and thevarious Israel-Hamasglobal warconflicts for the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, there may be potential impacts to our business in the future that are highly uncertain and difficult to predict, including our ability to raise additional funds, disruptions to the supply chain and the manufacture or shipment of drug substances and finished drug products for our product candidates for use in our research, preclinical studies and clinical studies, impediments to our clinical trial initiation and recruitment, errors or omissions at our clinical sites and the ability of patients to continue in clinical studies, delays in the FDA’s review and approval processes,processes including as a result of recent layoffs, our ability to effectively operate across different geographies in which our offices are located, continuedany increases in interest rates and economic inflation, bank failures, the impact on the global economy due to thevarious Russia/Ukraineglobal conflict and Israel-Hamas war,conflicts, higher prices of supplies, tariffs, changes in monetary and fiscal policy, U.S. political developments and other sources of instability and changes in availability and cost of credit and our ability to access capital. The ultimate impact of these geopolitical and macroeconomic factors, as well as any lasting effects on the way we conduct our business, is highly uncertain and subject to continued change, and we recognize that they may continue to present unique challenges for us.
On July 4, 2025, the annual reconciliation bill, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”) was signed into law, introducing significant changes to U.S. federal tax law. The new law repeals the requirement to capitalize domestic research and development (“R&D”) expenditures for federal income tax purposes for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024, and allows for the accelerated deduction of any remaining unamortized domestic R&D expenditures. Foreign R&D expenditures are still required to be capitalized and amortized ratably over 15 years. The law also permanently allows one hundred percent bonus depreciation for qualified business property, including machinery, equipment, and certain improvements to nonresidential real property.
We expect our general and administrative expenses will increase during the next several years as we increase our headcount and expand our infrastructure to support our operations, particularly as a public company. In addition, as a public company, we have incurred and will continue to incur significant legal, accounting, investor relations and other expenses to comply with the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act,Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the listing standards of Nasdaq, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and other applicable securities rules and regulations. Our general and administrative expenses may fluctuate from period to period as we continue to grow.
Other License Income
Other license income consists of income from a non-exclusive license of certain patents granted under the Genetech Agreement. For more detail on our other license income, refer to Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II. Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report.
Gains on Sale of Non-financial Assets
Gains on sale of non-financial assets consists of the gain on sale of certain patents under the Exelixis Agreement. For more detail on our gains on sale of non-financial assets, refer to Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II. Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report.
Interest and Other Income (Expense),Income, Net
Interest and other income (expense),income, net primarily consists of interest income earned on our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, including amortization and accretion of premiums and discounts on short-term investments, and foreign currency exchange gains and losses and interest expense for the amortization of debt issuance costs.losses.
Research and development expenses increased by $38.7$116.4 million, or 55%,107%, to $225.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to $108.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $70.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The increase in research and development expenses was primarily due to increases related to increasesclinical intrial personnel-relatedcosts, preclinical research and development expenses, employee expenses (primarily due to an increase in headcount, an increase in research and development expenses and consulting services to support the advancement of our GLP-1R franchise including alenigripron (GSBR-1290personnel) and ana increasemilestone inpayment theunder allocationour ofAconcagua-Schrödinger facilities costs.Agreement.
General and administrative expenses increased by $16.7$12.1 million, or 51%,25%, to $61.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to $49.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $32.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to increases in personnel-relatedemployee expenses and professional services as we expanded our infrastructure to drive and support the growth in our operations as a publicly-traded company.
Other License Income
Other license income was $100.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2025, consisting of a $100.0 million income from the license of certain patents that cover a class of oral GLP-1 receptor agonists that is different from aleniglipron under the Genentech Agreement. We did not have similar agreements during the year ended December 31, 2024. For more detail on our other license income, refer to Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II. Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report.
Gains on Sale of Non-financial Assets
Gains on sale of non-financial assets was $10.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2025, consisting of a $10.2 million gain on the sale of certain early-stage non-metabolic and non-obesity assets under the Exelixis Agreement. We did not have similar agreements during the year ended December 31, 2024. For more detail on our gains on sale of non-financial assets, refer to Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II. Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report.
Interest and Other Income (Expense),Income, Net
Interest and other income (expense),income, net, increaseddecreased by $22.6$0.1 million to an income of $35.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to an income of $36.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to an income of $13.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2023.2024. The increasedecrease in interest and other income (expense),income, net, was primarily due to a decrease in interest income from lower interest rates, partly offset by an increase in interest income from higher cash, cash equivalents and short-term investment balances.
Sources of Funds
Initial Public Offering
From our reorganization as a Cayman Islands exempted company in February 2019 through immediately prior to completion of our IPO, we funded our operations primarily with an aggregate of $198.0 million in gross cash proceeds from the sale of redeemable convertible preferred shares. In connection with the closing of our IPO in February 2023, we completed our IPOissued and receivedsold an aggregate of 12,351,000 American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”) (inclusive of 1,611,000 ADSs pursuant to the exercise by the underwriters of their option) at a price of $15.00 per ADS for net cash proceeds of approximately $166.7 million inmillion, net proceeds after deductingof underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering costs. In October 2023, we completed our Private Placement and received $281.5 million in net proceeds after deducting placement agent fees and other private placement expenses. In June 2024, we closed our Follow-On Offering and received $512.7 million in net proceeds after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses. As of December 31, 2024, we had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of $883.5 million and an accumulated deficit of $329.1 million.
Private Placement
In September 2023, we entered into a share purchase agreement with certain institutional investors (the “Purchasers”), pursuant to which we agreed to sell and issue to the Purchasers an aggregate of 21,617,295 ordinary shares and 2,401,920 newly designated non-voting ordinary shares at a purchase price of $12.49 per share (or the equivalent of $37.47 per ADS), the closing price of our ADS on the Nasdaq Global Market on September 28, 2023 (the “Private Placement”). We completed the Private Placement in October 2023 and received approximately $281.5 million in net proceeds after deducting placement agent fees and other private placement expenses.
2024 Follow-On Offering
In June 2024, we issued and sold 10,427,017 ADSs at a price of $52.50 per ADS, including the full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,360,045 additional ADSs, and received $512.7 million in net proceeds, after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses (the “2024 Follow-On Offering”).
At-the-Market Offering
In August 2025, we entered into a sales agreement (the “ATM Sales Agreement”) with Leerink Partners LLC and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. (the “ATM Sales Agents”), pursuant to which we may, from time to time, offer and sell our ADSs through the ATM Sales Agents in any manner deemed to be an “at-the-market” offering up to an aggregate offering price of $250.0 million (the “ATM Offering”). In September 2025, we sold 3,040,000 ADSs under the ATM Sales Agreement, for gross proceeds of approximately $58.5 million. The net proceeds after deducting sales commissions to the ATM Sales Agents were approximately $57.1 million, and, after further deducting offering expenses were approximately $55.8 million.
2025 Follow-On Offering
In December 2025, we issued and sold (i) 9,961,538 ADSs, including the issuance of 1,500,000 ADSs in connection with the full exercise of the underwriters’ option, and (ii) in lieu of ADSs to certain investors, pre-funded warrants to purchase ordinary shares represented by 1,538,462 ADSs (the “Pre-Funded Warrants”) at a price of $64.9999 per Pre-Funded Warrant, which represents the per ADS public offering price less the $0.0001 per share exercise price for each such Pre-Funded Warrant. We received $701.5 million in net proceeds, after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses (the “2025 Follow-On Offering”). As of December 31, 2025, we had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of $1,446.2 million and an accumulated deficit of $470.3 million.
Prior to our IPO, we financed our operations primarily through the private placement of equity securities and have received aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $198.0 million. Since our inception, we have incurred net operating losses and negative cash flows from operations. We had net losses of $141.2 million, $122.5 million and $89.6 million in the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $329.1$470.3 million. In February 2023, we completed our IPO for net proceeds of $166.7 million. In October 2023, we completed our Private Placement and received $281.5 million in net proceeds after deducting placement agent fees and other private placement expenses. In June 2024, we closed our Follow-On Offering and received $512.7 million in net proceeds after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses. Our primary activities to date have included organizing and staffing our company, business and scientific planning, raising capital, conducting research and development activities, entering into strategic and corporate structuring transactions, enabling manufacturing activities in support of our product candidate development efforts, establishing our intellectual property portfolio, and providing general and administrative support for these activities.
To date, we have not generated any revenue from our products. We do not expect to generate any significant product revenue until we successfully develop and obtain regulatory approval for and commercialize our product candidates, and we do not know when, or if, either will occur. We expect to continue to incur significant and increasing expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future, particularly if and as we continue to invest in our research and development activities and initiate additional clinical studies, expand our product pipeline, hire additional personnel and invest in and grow our business, maintain, expand and protect our intellectual property portfolio, and seek regulatory approvals for and commercialize any approved product candidates. In addition, we have incurred and expect to continue to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company, including significant legal, audit, accounting, regulatory, tax-related, director and officer insurance, investor relations and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. Moreover, we may in the future seek to acquire or invest in additional businesses, products, or technologies that we believe could complement or enhance our product,products, enhance our technical capabilities or otherwise offer growth opportunities, although we currently have no agreements or understandings with respect to any such acquisitions or investments. We are subject to the risks typically related to the development of new product candidates, and we may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other unknown factors that may adversely affect our business.
We will need substantial additional capital to develop our product candidatescandidates, including to fund Phase 3 clinical studies of aleniglipron, and fund operations for the foreseeable future. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:
Until such time as we can generate significant revenue from product sales, if ever, we expect to finance our operations through the public or private sale of equity, government or private party grants, debt financings or other capital sources, including potential collaborations with other companies or other strategic transactions.
During the year ended December 31, 2025, net cash used in operating activities was $222.2 million, consisting of a net loss of $141.2 million, an increase in net operating assets of $88.0 million, partially offset by non-cash charges of $7.0 million. The increase in net loss was primarily due to the increase in operating expenses as we invest in our research and development efforts. The increase in net operating assets was primarily due to an increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets and a decrease in operating lease liabilities, partially offset by an increase in accrued expenses and other current liabilities, an increase in accounts payable and a decrease in other non-current assets. Non-cash charges consisted primarily of share-based compensation and non-cash lease expense, partially offset by net gain from accretion of net investment discounts and gain on sale of non-financial assets.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, net cash used in operating activities was $79.5 million, consisting primarily of a net loss of $89.6 million, partially offset by non-cash charges of $3.2 million and a decrease in net operating assets of $7.0 million. The increase in net loss was primarily due to the increase in operating expenses as we invest in our research and development efforts and operate as a publicly-traded company. Non-cash charges consisted primarily of share-based compensation, partially offset by net gain from accretion of net investment discounts. The decrease in net operating assets was primarily due to an increase in accrued expenses and other current liabilities, partially offset by an increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets.
Cash Flows Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
During the year ended December 31, 2025, net cash provided by investing activities was $89.8 million, consisting primarily of net maturities of short-term investments of $83.2 million, and proceeds from sale of non-financial asset of $10.2 million.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, net cash used in investing activities was $268.3 million, consisting primarily of net purchases of short-term investments.
During the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, net cash provided by financing activities was $515.3$762.5 million, consisting primarily of proceeds from our 2025 Follow-On Offering of $514.6$702.7 million, net of underwriting discounts and commissions and from sales of our ADSs under the ATM Offering of $57.1 million, net of sales commissions.
During the year ended December 31, 2023,2024, net cash provided by financing activities was $451.5$515.3 million, consisting primarily of proceeds from our IPO2024 Follow-On Offering of $172.3$514.6 million, net of underwriting discounts and commissions, and gross proceeds from our Private Placement of $300.0 million, partially offset by payments of offering costs of $21.6 million.commissions.
Accrued Research and Development and Clinical Expenses
We have entered into various agreements with contract manufacturing organizations (“CMOs”) and CROs.contract research organizations (“CROs”). Our research and development and clinical accruals are estimateddetermined based on the level of services performed, progress of the studies, including the phase or completion of events, and contracted costs. Accruals for CROs and CMOs are recorded based on services received and efforts expended pursuant to agreements established with CROs, CMOs, and other outside service providers. We determine our costs through discussions with internal clinical stakeholders and outside service providers as to the progress or stage of completion of clinical studies or services and the contracted fee to be paid for such services. The estimateddetermined costs of research and development and clinical studies provided, but not yet invoiced, are included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. If the actual timing of the performance of services or the level of effort varies from the original estimates,amounts, we will adjust the accrual accordingly. Payments made to CMOs and CROs under these arrangements in advance of the performance of the related services are recorded as prepaid expenses and other current assets on the balance sheets until the services are rendered. To date, our estimated accruals have not differed materially from the actual costs.
We make judgements in determining the accrual balance in each reporting period. Payments made to CMOs and CROs under these arrangements in advance of the performance of the related services are recorded as prepaid expenses and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheets and subsequently recognized as research and development expense when the associated services have been performed. As actual costs become known, we adjust our liabilities and assets. Inputs used in our determination of costs discussed above may vary from actual, which will result in adjustments to research and development expense in future periods. To date, our accruals have not differed materially from the actual costs.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
Removed heading “We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting in the past and may identify additional material weaknesses in the future or fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, which may result in material misstatements of our consolidated financial statements or cause us to fail to meet our periodic reporting obligations.”
Largest changes
“We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting in the past and may identify additional material weaknesses in the future or fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, which may result in material misstatements of our consolidated financial statements or cause us to fail to meet our periodic reporting obligations.”see in full comparison
We do not own or operate manufacturing facilities and have no plans to build our own clinical or commercial scale manufacturing capabilities. We rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third parties for the manufacture of our product candidates and related raw materials for preclinical and clinical development, as well as for commercial manufacture if any of our product candidates receive marketing approval. This reliance increases the risk that we will not have sufficient quantities of our product candidates or products, if approved, or such quantities at an acceptable cost or quality, which could delay, prevent or impair our development or commercialization efforts. Our APIs and drug product for our product candidates are currently provided by a supplier, WuXi STA, a subsidiary of WuXi AppTec, and we expect to rely on this supplier for the foreseeable future. Contract manufacturing organizations may become subject to legislation, trade restrictions, sanctions, and other regulatory requirements by the U.S. government, which could restrict or even prohibit our ability to work with such entities, thereby potentially disrupting the supply of material to us. For example, on December 18, 2025, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026 (the “NDAA”) was signed into law, which includes the BIOSECURE Act that prohibits the U.S. government from procuring biotechnology equipment or services from “biotechnology companies of concern,” and would prohibit U.S. government contracts, loans and grants to any entity that uses biotechnology equipment or services from a designated “biotechnology company of concern.” The Office of Management and Budget will issue a list of “biotechnology companies of concern” no later than mid-December 2026. “Biotechnology company of concern” is defined under the BIOSECUREsee in full comparisonAct.Act“Biotechnology companies of concern”to include (i) certain companies identified on the U.S. Department of Defense’s “Chinese military companies operating in the United States” list (the “1260H List”), (ii) companies that the Office of Management andalsoBudgetauthorizes the U.S. government to identify additional entities for inclusiondesignates as a “biotechnologycompaniescompany of concern” based on certaincriteria. Suchcriteriainvolvesincludinganwhether the entitythatis subject to the administrative governance structure, direction, control, or operates on behalf of a foreign adversary, is involved in the manufacture, distribution, provision, or procurement of a biotechnology equipment or service, and poses a risk to U.S. national security based on engagement with, being supported by, or being affiliated with a foreign adversary’s military, internal security forces, or intelligence agencies and its multiomic data (genomic information) collection and provisionpractices.practices,Thereandis(iii)acertain“safesubsidiariesharbor”orprovisionparentprovidingorthatsuccessor entities of therestrictionsforegoing.doOnnotJuneapply8,to2026,equipmentanor services that were formerly but are no longer provided by a “biotechnology company of concern,” as well as a “grandfathering” provision providing that the prohibitions shall not apply for a five-year period to biotechnology equipment or services produced or provided under a contract or agreement entered into before the applicable effective date. With the BIOSECURE Act, we may be restricted in our ability to work with certain Chinese biotechnology manufacturing companiesupdate to theextent1260HweListwouldwascontractissuedwith,andorWuxiotherwiseAppTecreceivewasfunding from, the U.S. government. In addition, if we, our suppliers, or our customers wereadded tobe designated as a “biotechnology company of concern,” this could potentially cause harm to our business and financial condition. In addition, any U.S. executive action, legislative action or potential sanctions with China could materially impact entities that work with Chinese biotechnology companies. U.S. executive agencies may designate entities and individuals on various governmental prohibited and restricted parties lists. Depending on the designation, potential consequences can range from a comprehensive prohibition on all transactions or dealings with designated parties, or a limited prohibition on certain types of activities,suchas exports and financing activities, with designated parties. Such disruption could have adverse effects on the development of our product candidates. We have contracted with, or are in the process of pursuing contracts with, alternative suppliers or manufacturers outside of China for our APIs and drug product for our product candidates. While we believe that our current manufacturing plan will provide us with alternative sources for such supplies, there is a risk that, if supplies are interrupted, or the quality of ingredients provided by such alternative sources is not to our specification, it would cause delays in our supply chain and increase the cost of manufacturing our drugs, which could materially harm our business.list.
“There is a “safe harbor” provision in the BIOSECURE Act providing that the restrictions do not apply to equipment or services that were formerly but are no longer provided by a “biotechnology company of concern,” as well as a “grandfathering” provision providing that the prohibitions shall not apply for a five-year period to biotechnology equipment or services produced or provided under a contract or agreement entered into before the applicable effective date. …”see in full comparison
Competitors or other third parties may infringe or otherwise violate our patents, trademarks or other intellectual property. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to file infringement claims, which can be expensive and time consuming and divert the time and attention of our management and scientific personnel. Our pending patent applications cannot be enforced against third parties practicing the technologies claimed in such applications unless and until a patent issues from such applications. Any claims we assert against perceived infringers could provoke these parties to assert counterclaims against us alleging that we infringe their patents, in addition to counterclaims asserting that our patents are invalid or unenforceable, or both. In patent litigation in the United States, defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity and/or unenforceability are commonplace. Grounds for a validity challenge could be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory requirements, including lack of novelty, obviousness, non-enablement or insufficient written description. Grounds for an unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone connected with prosecution of the patent withheld relevant information from the USPTO or patent offices in foreign countries or made a misleading statement during prosecution. Third parties may also raise similar validity claims before the USPTO in post-grant proceedings such as ex parte reexaminations, IPR, or PGR, or oppositions or similar proceedings outside the United States, in parallel with litigation or even outside the context of litigation. For example, in July 2026, Kailera Therapeutics, Inc. initiated a proceeding before the European Patent Office challenging the validity of a European patent held by our wholly owned subsidiary, Gasherbrum Bio Inc., and filed an application in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California seeking discovery from us in support of that European proceeding. The timing and outcome of these proceedings are unpredictable. Although the European patent covers a class of oral GLP-1 receptor agonists that is different from aleniglipron and any other compound in clinical development by us, an adverse determination in any such proceedings may result in our patent claims being narrowed, invalidated, or held unenforceable, in whole or in part, which could limit our ability to stop others from using or commercializing similar technologies and products, or limit the duration of the patent protection of our technologies. The outcome following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability is unpredictable. There may be invalidating prior art, of which we and the patent examiner were unaware during prosecution. There may be double patenting among our own patents, which the patent examiner(s) fail to raise during prosecution. For the patents and patent applications that we have licensed, we may have limited or no right to participate in the defense of any licensed patents against challenge by a third party. If a defendant were to prevail on a legal assertion of invalidity or unenforceability, we would lose at least part, and perhaps all, of any future patent protection on our current or future product candidates. Such a loss of patent protection could harm our business. In any patent infringement proceeding, there is a risk that a court will decide that a patent of ours is invalid or unenforceable, in whole or in part, and that we do not have the right to stop the other party from using the invention at issue. There is also a risk that, even if the validity of such patents is upheld, the court will construe the patent’s claims narrowly or decide that we do not have the right to stop the other party from using the invention at issue on the grounds that our patent claims do not cover the invention, or decide that the other party’s use of our patented technologies falls under the safe harbor to patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. §271(e)(1). An adverse outcome in a litigation or other proceeding involving our patents could limit our ability to assert our patents against those parties or other competitors and may curtail or preclude our ability to exclude third parties from making and selling similar or competitive products. In addition, if the breadth or strength of protection provided by our patents and patent applications or those of our future licensors is threatened, it could dissuade other companies from collaborating with us to license, develop or commercialize current or future product candidates. Any of these occurrences could adversely affect our competitive business position, business prospects and financial condition. Similarly, if we assert trademark infringement claims, a court may determine that the marks we have asserted are invalid or unenforceable, or that the party against whom we have asserted trademark infringement has superior rights to the marks in question. In such case, we could ultimately be forced to cease use of such trademarks. In any intellectual property litigation, even if we are successful, any award of monetary damages or other remedy we receive may not be commercially valuable.see in full comparison
“In any patent infringement proceeding, there is a risk that a court will decide that a patent of ours is invalid or unenforceable, in whole or in part, and that we do not have the right to stop the other party from using the invention at issue. …”see in full comparison
We, and the third parties with whom we share our facilities, are subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing laboratory procedures and the handling, use, storage, treatment and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes. Each of our operations involve the use of hazardous and flammable materials, including chemicals and biological and radioactive materials. Each of our operations also produce hazardous waste products. We generally contract with third parties for the disposal of these materials and wastes. We cannot eliminate the risk of contamination or injury from these materials. We could be held liable for any resulting damages in the event of contamination or injury resulting from the use of hazardous materials by us or the third parties with whom we share our facilities, and any liability could exceed our resources. We also could incur significant costs associated with civil or criminal fines and penalties.see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (91)
Biopharmaceutical product development is a highly speculative undertaking and involves a substantial degree of risk. We are a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company with a limited operating history, which may make it difficult to evaluate the success of our business to date and assess our future viability. Since our inception in 2016, we have focused primarily on organizing and staffing our company, business planning, establishing our intellectual property portfolio, raising capital, developing our structure-based drug discovery platform, identifying and developing our product candidates, conducting preclinical studies and, more recently, clinical studies,trials, and providing general and administrative support for these operations. Our approach to the discovery and development of product candidates based on our structure-based drug discovery platform is unproven, and we do not know whether we will be able to develop any product candidates that succeed in clinical development or, if approved, commercially. Further, aleniglipron, our product candidate for obesity, overweight and related conditions, ACCG-2671 and ACCG-3535, our oral small molecule amylin receptor agonist development candidates for the treatment of obesity, LTSE-2578, our product candidate for IPF, are in early clinical development and our other product candidates and programs are in preclinical development or discovery stages. Accordingly, we have not yet demonstrated an ability to successfully obtain regulatory approvals, manufacture a commercial scale product or arrange for a third party to do so on our behalf, or conduct sales and marketing activities necessary for successful product commercialization. Consequently, any predictions made about our future success or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a history of successfully developing and commercializing biopharmaceutical products.
We have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue to date, and we continue to incur significant research and development and other expenses related to our ongoing operations. As a result, we are not profitable and have incurred significant losses since our inception and expect to continue to incur significant and increasing operating losses for at least the next several years. Our net losses were $76.0$182.1 million and $141.2 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and year ended December 31, 2025, respectively. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $546.3$652.4 million. Substantially all of our losses have resulted from expenses incurred in connection with our research and development programs and from general and administrative costs associated with our operations. All of our product candidates will require substantial additional development time and resources, including additional funding to conduct Phase 3 clinical studiestrials of aleniglipron, before we would be able to apply for or receive marketing approvals and begin generating revenue from product sales. We expect to continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future, and we anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially as we continue our development of, seek marketing approval for and potentially commercialize any of our product candidates, recruit and maintain key personnel and seek to identify, assess, acquire, in-license or develop additional product candidates.
The development of biopharmaceutical product candidates is capital-intensive. We expect our expenses to increase substantially in connection with our ongoing and planned activities, particularly as we conduct our ongoing and planned preclinical studies and clinical studiestrials of aleniglipron, ACCG-2671, LTSE-2578,ACCG-3535, ACCG-3535LTSE-2578 and any future product candidates we may develop. Our expenses will increase substantially as product candidates successfully complete clinical and other studies,trials, and also could increase beyond expectations if the FDA or foreign authorities require us to perform clinical and other studiestrials in addition to those that we currently anticipate. Because the outcome of any clinical trial or preclinical study is highly uncertain, we cannot reasonably estimate the actual amounts necessary to successfully complete the development and commercialization of our product candidates. In addition, we have and expect to continue to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company. Furthermore, if we obtain marketing approval for our product candidates, we expect to incur significant expenses related to manufacturing, marketing, sales and distribution. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funding in connection with our continuing operations. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our research and development programs or any future commercialization efforts.
Based on our current operating plan, we believe that our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, will be sufficient to fund our projected operations and key clinical milestones through the end of 2028. This includes costs related to the ongoing aleniglipron ACCESS OLE, ACCESS II extension study,trial, the supplementary studies,trials, and Phase 3 registrational program in chronic weight management, but excludes additional costs related to pre-commercialization activities including commercial manufacturing. We have based these estimates on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could use our capital resources sooner than we currently expect. Our operating plan may change as a result of many factors currently unknown to us, and we may need to seek additional funds sooner than planned, through equity offerings, debt financings or other capital sources, including potentially grants, collaborations, licenses and other similar arrangements. Even if we believe we have sufficient capital for our current or future operating plans, we may seek additional capital if market conditions are favorable or if we have specific strategic considerations.
Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenue, we expect to finance our operations through equity offerings, debt financings or other capital sources, including potentially grants, collaborations, licenses or other similar arrangements. For example, (i) in October 2023, we issued and sold an aggregate of 21,617,295 ordinary shares and 2,401,920 newly designated non-voting ordinary shares; (ii) in June 2024, we issued and sold an aggregate of 10,427,017 ADSs; (iii) in August 2025, we entered into a sales agreement (the “ATM Sales Agreement”) with Leerink Partners LLC and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., pursuant to which we may offer and sell our ADSs in at-the-market offerings, initially up to an aggregate offering price of $250.0 million, and in September 2025, we sold 3,040,000 ADSs under the ATM Sales Agreement (as of March 31, 2026, approximately $191.5 million remained available for sale under the ATM Sales Agreement); and in May 2026, we amended and restated the ATM Sales Agreement (the "Amended and Restated Sales Agreement") to remove the aggregate offering cap and filed a prospectus supplement registering an additional $150.0 million in ADSs available to be sold thereunder, for an aggregate offering price of up to $400.0 million (as of the date of this Quarterly Report, approximately $341.5 million remained available for sale); and (iv) in December 2025, we issued and sold an aggregate of 9,961,538 ADSs and, in lieu of ADSs, pre-funded warrants to purchase ordinary shares represented by 1,538,462 ADSs. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership interest of our shareholders will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect the rights of our ADS holders. Debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as limitations on our ability to incur additional debt, make capital expenditures or declare dividends. If we raise funds through collaborations or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may be required to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us.
The success of our business depends primarily upon our ability to identify novel product candidates based on our structure-based drug discovery platform and to successfully develop and commercialize those product candidates. While we have had favorable preclinical study and topline clinical trial results for certain of our development programs, we have not yet succeeded and may not succeed in demonstrating efficacy and safety for any product candidates in clinical studiestrials or in obtaining marketing approvals or in commercializing such product candidates. We also may be unsuccessful in identifying additional product candidates using our platform, and any of our product candidates may be shown to have harmful side effects or may have other characteristics that may necessitate additional clinical testing, or make the product candidates unmarketable or unlikely to receive marketing approval. In particular, because all of our product candidates have been derived from our structure-based drug discovery platform, any failure of one of our development programs could create a perception that our other programs are less likely to succeed or that our discovery platform is not viable. Similarly, adverse developments with respect to other companies that attempt to use a similar approach to our approach may adversely impact the actual or perceived value and potential of our discovery platform and resulting product candidates.
We are early in our development efforts and only have four product candidates in early clinical development — aleniglipron, ACCG-2671, LTSE-2578ACCG-3535 and ACCG-3535.LTSE-2578. All of our other development programs are in the preclinical or discovery stage. If we are unable to advance our product candidates in clinical development, obtain regulatory approval and ultimately commercialize our product candidates, or experience significant delays in doing so, our business will be materially harmed.
We are in the early stages of our development efforts and have four product candidates, aleniglipron, ACCG-2671, LTSE-2578ACCG-3535 and ACCG-3535,LTSE-2578, in early clinical development.
We have not yet succeeded and may not succeed in demonstrating efficacy and safety for any product candidates in clinical studiestrials or in obtaining marketing approval thereafter. Given our early stage of development, it will take several years before we can demonstrate the safety and efficacy of a product candidate sufficient to warrant approval for commercialization, if we can do so at all. If we are unable to develop, or obtain marketing approval for, or, if approved, successfully commercialize our product candidates, we may not be able to generate sufficient revenue to continue our business.
Clinical and preclinical drug development involves a lengthy and expensive process with uncertain timelines and outcomes. The results of prior clinical studiestrials and preclinical studies are not necessarily predictive of future results, and may not be favorable, or receive regulatory approval on a timely basis, if at all.
Clinical drug development is expensive and can take many years to complete, and its outcome is inherently uncertain. Our clinical studiestrials may not be conducted as planned or completed on schedule, if at all, and failure can occur at any time during the preclinical study or clinical trial process. For example, we depend on the availability of non-human primates (“NHPs”) to conduct certain preclinical studies that we are required to complete prior to submitting an IND and initiating clinical development. There is currently a global shortage of NHPs available for drug development. This has caused the cost of obtaining NHPs for our preclinical studies to increase dramatically and, if the shortage continues, could also result in delays to our development timelines. Despite promising preclinical or clinical results, any product candidate can unexpectedly fail at any stage of preclinical or clinical development. The historical failure rate for product candidates in our industry is high. Furthermore, the results from clinical studiestrials or preclinical studies of a product candidate may not predict the results of later clinical studiestrials of the product candidate, and interim results of a clinical trial are not necessarily indicative of final results. For example, the preliminary topline nature of aleniglipron results, the length of the studytrial and sample size may render these results not necessarily indicative of the results for our future clinical studiestrials for aleniglipron and may not be comparable to other weight loss products or product candidates, including other oral selective GLP-1RAs. In addition, given the size of the Phase 2a obesity cohort, the primary efficacy endpoint of weight loss was calculated using LSM and analyzed based on the primary efficacy estimand using a mixed model for repeated measures. This means that we drew on all available data, including data from patients that did not follow-up at 12 weeks. The model estimates how patients with missing data would have responded based on patients who continued the studytrial and had similar baseline characteristics (implicit imputation). Product candidates in later stages of clinical studiestrials may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy characteristics despite having progressed through preclinical studies and initial clinical studies.trials. In particular, while we have conducted, or are conducting certain preclinical studies of our product candidates, the predictive value of these studiestrials with respect to future testing in humans is limited, particularly in indications where animal models are less developed.
Even if our clinical studiestrials are completed, the results may not be sufficient to obtain marketing approval for our product candidates. In clinical studiestrials that are based on preclinical studies and early clinical studies,trials, it is not uncommon to observe unexpected results, and many product candidates fail in clinical development despite very promising early results. Moreover, preclinical and clinical data may be susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses. A number of companies in the biopharmaceutical industry have suffered significant setbacks in clinical development even after achieving promising results in earlier studies.trials. In addition, in some cases, external experts or regulatory authorities disagreed with such companies’ views and interpretations of the data and results from earlier preclinical studies or clinical studies.trials. As we investigate aleniglipron for obesity, overweight and related conditions, ACCG-2671 and ACCG-3535 for obesity and overweight, LTSE-2578, our product candidate for IPF, we may encounter new and unforeseen difficulties. Similarly, any future product candidates we may develop may not be able to progress from preclinical to Phase 1 clinical development. For the foregoing reasons, we cannot be certain that our ongoing and planned clinical studiestrials and preclinical studies will be successful. Any of the foregoing occurrences may harm our business, financial condition and prospects significantly.
Any difficulties or delays in the commencement or completion, or termination or suspension, of our ongoing and planned clinical studiestrials could result in increased costs to us, delay or limit our ability to generate revenue and adversely affect our commercial prospects.
In order to obtain FDA approval to market our product candidates, we must demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our product candidates in humans to the satisfaction of the FDA. To meet these requirements, we will have to conduct adequate and well-controlled clinical studies.trials. In addition, before we can initiate clinical studiestrials for any product candidate, we must submit the results of preclinical studies to the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities along with other information, including information about product candidate chemistry, manufacturing and controls and our proposed clinical trial protocol, as part of an IND or similar regulatory submission, and we are also required to submit comparable applications to foreign regulatory authorities for clinical studiestrials outside of the United States.
Clinical testing is expensive, time-consuming and subject to uncertainty. Conducting preclinical studies and clinical studiestrials represents a lengthy, time-consuming and expensive process. The length of time may vary substantially according to the type, complexity and novelty of the program, and often can be several years or more per program. Delays associated with programs for which we are directly conducting preclinical studies may cause us to incur additional operating expenses.
Clinical trials may not be conducted as planned or completed on schedule, if at all.
Clinical studies may not be conducted as planned or completed on schedule, if at all. For example, in September 2023, we reported that a data collection omission had occurred at a clinical site that impacted the obesity cohort (120 mg dose level) of the Phase 2a study for aleniglipron, where weight was not collected at the final (week 12) visit for 24 of the 40 enrolled participants, and as a result of this data collection omission, we were delayed and reported interim Phase 2a obesity cohort data in December 2023, and topline 12-week obesity data in June 2024.
We could also encounter delays if a clinical trial is suspended or terminated by us, by the IRBs of the institutions in which such studiestrials are being conducted, by a Data Safety Monitoring Board for such trial or by the FDA or applicable foreign authorities. Such authorities may impose such a suspension or termination due to a number of factors, including failure to conduct the clinical trial in accordance with regulatory requirements or our clinical protocols, inspection of the clinical trial operations or trial site by the FDA or applicable foreign authorities resulting in the imposition of a clinical hold, unforeseen safety issues or adverse side effects, failure to demonstrate a benefit from using a drug, changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions or lack of adequate funding to continue the clinical trial. In addition, changes in regulatory requirements and policies may occur, and we may need to amend clinical trial protocols to comply with these changes. Amendments may require us to resubmit our clinical trial protocols to IRBs for reexamination and approval, which may impact the costs, timing or successful completion of a clinical trial.
Further, conducting clinical studiestrials in foreign countries, as we may do for our product candidates, presents additional risks that may delay completion of our clinical studies.trials. These risks include the failure of enrolled patients in foreign countries to adhere to clinical protocols as a result of differences in healthcare services or cultural customs, managing additional administrative burdens associated with foreign regulatory requirements, as well as political, currency exchange and other economic risks relevant to such foreign countries. Investigators and patients may not be able to comply with clinical trial protocols if quarantines impede patient movement or interrupt healthcare services. Similarly, our ability to recruit and retain patients and principal investigators and site staff may be reduced, which in turn could adversely impact our clinical trial operations. Additionally, we may experience interruption of key clinical trial activities, such as clinical trial site monitoring, due to limitations on travel, quarantines or social distancing protocols imposed or recommended by federal or state governments, employers and others in connection with public health concerns. We have faced and may continue to face delays in meeting our anticipated timelines for our ongoing and planned clinical studies.trials. We experienced delays in our patient enrollment and our supply chain as a direct result of COVID-19 on our suppliers’ ability to timely manufacture and ship certain supplies such as reagents and other lab consumables and due to the data collection omission at a clinical site as discussed above. These delays have previously impacted and could in the future adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.
Any inability to successfully complete preclinical and clinical development could result in additional costs to us or impair our ability to generate revenue from future product sales and regulatory and commercialization milestones. In addition, if we make manufacturing or formulation changes to our product candidates, we may need to conduct additional testing to bridge our modified product candidate to earlier versions. For example, to facilitate potential commercial-scale manufacturing, we expect to transition from capsule formulations of our product candidates used for early clinical studiestrials to tablet formulations, including the addition of excipients, in later stage clinical studies.trials. While these formulation transitions are common for small molecule drug candidates, we cannot guarantee that we will not encounter delays or unexpected results in bridging studiestrials or implementing necessary changes to the manufacturing process. Clinical trial delays could also shorten any periods during which we may have the exclusive right to commercialize our product candidates, if approved, or allow our competitors to bring comparable products to market before we do, which could impair our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates and may harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Enrollment and retention of patients in clinical studiestrials is an expensive and time-consuming process and could be made more difficult or rendered impossible by multiple factors outside our control, which could adversely affect our business, operating results and prospects.
Patient enrollment is a significant factor impacting the duration of our clinical studies,trials, along with treatment duration and completion of required follow-up periods. Clinical studiestrials may be prolonged, or we may not be able to initiate or continue clinical studiestrials for our product candidates if we are unable to locate and enroll a sufficient number of eligible patients to participate as required by the FDA or applicable foreign authorities. For certain of our product candidates, the conditions which we may evaluate include rare diseases with limited patient pools from which to draw. In some cases, patient populations for rare diseases are located at specific academic sites focused on such indications, often with multiple competing clinical studies.trials. Potential patients for any planned clinical studiestrials may not be adequately diagnosed or identified with the diseases which we are targeting or may not meet the entry criteria for such studies.trials. We also may encounter difficulties in identifying and enrolling patients with a stage of disease appropriate for our planned clinical studiestrials and monitoring such patients adequately during and after treatment. As noted above, other pharmaceutical companies targeting these same diseases are recruiting clinical trial patients from these patient populations, which may make it more difficult to fully enroll our clinical studies.trials. In addition, the process of finding and diagnosing patients may prove costly.
The eligibility criteria of our clinical studies,trials, once established, may further limit the pool of available trial participants. If the actual number of patients with these diseases is smaller than we anticipate, we may encounter difficulties in enrolling patients in our clinical studies,trials, thereby delaying or preventing development and approval of our product candidates. Even once enrolled we may be unable to retain a sufficient number of patients to complete any of our studies.trials.
The timely completion of clinical studiestrials in accordance with their protocols depends, among other things, on our ability to enroll a sufficient number of patients who remain in the studytrial until its conclusion. We may experience difficulties in patient enrollment or retention in our clinical studiestrials for a variety of reasons. Patient enrollment and retention in clinical studiestrials depends on many factors, including:
Furthermore, our efforts to build relationships with patient communities may not succeed, which could result in delays in patient enrollment in our clinical studies.trials. If we encounter any delays in enrolling such additional participants, this may further delay our clinical trial. In addition, any negative results we may report in clinical studiestrials of our product candidate may make it difficult or impossible to recruit and retain patients in other clinical studiestrials of that same product candidate. Delays or failures in planned patient enrollment or retention may result in increased costs, program delays or both, which could have a harmful effect on our ability to develop our product candidates, or could render further development impossible. For example, the impact of public health epidemics may delay or prevent patients from enrolling or from receiving treatment in accordance with the protocol and the required timelines, which could delay our clinical studies,trials, or prevent us or our partners from completing our clinical studiestrials at all, and harm our ability to obtain approval for such product candidate. Further, if patients drop out of our clinical studies,trials, miss scheduled doses or follow-up visits, or otherwise fail to follow clinical trial protocols, the integrity of data from our clinical studiestrials may be compromised or not accepted by the FDA or applicable foreign authorities, which would represent a significant setback for the applicable program. In addition, we may rely on CROs and clinical trial sites to ensure proper and timely conduct of our current and future clinical studiestrials and, while we have entered and intend to enter into agreements governing their services, we will be limited in our ability to compel their actual performance. Such delays or failures could adversely affect our business, operating results and prospects.
During the conduct of clinical studies,trials, patients report changes in their health, including illnesses, injuries and discomforts, to their doctor. Often, it is not possible to determine whether or not the product candidate being studied caused these conditions. Regulatory authorities may draw different conclusions or require additional testing to confirm these determinations, if they occur. In addition, it is possible that as we test our product candidates in larger, longer and more extensive clinical studiestrials with a broader group of patients, or as use of these product candidates becomes more widespread if they receive marketing approval, illnesses, injuries, discomforts and other AEs that were observed in earlier studies,trials, as well as conditions that did not occur or went undetected in previous studies,trials, will be reported by participants. Many times, side effects are only detectable after investigational product candidates are tested in large-scale, Phase 3 studiestrials or, in some cases, after they are made available to patients on a commercial scale after approval. If additional clinical experience indicates that any of our current product candidates and any future product candidates has serious or life-threatening side effects or other side effects that outweigh the potential therapeutic benefit, the development of the product candidate may fail or be delayed, or, if the product candidate has received marketing approval, such approval may be revoked, which would harm our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition. In particular, because we are developing our product candidates for chronic indications, the FDA and applicable foreign authorities will likely require that our product candidates demonstrate a higher level of safety over a longer period of time than would be the case for product candidates intended for short-term use. Moreover, if we elect, or are required, to delay, suspend or terminate any clinical trial of our product candidates, the commercial prospects of our product candidates may be harmed and our ability to generate revenue through their sale may be delayed or eliminated. Any of these occurrences may harm our business, financial condition and prospects significantly.
Moreover, if any of our product candidates are associated with undesirable side effects in clinical studiestrials or have characteristics that are unexpected, we may elect to abandon their development or limit their development to more narrow uses or subpopulations in which the undesirable side effects or other characteristics are less prevalent, less severe or more acceptable from a risk-benefit perspective, which may limit the commercial value for the product candidate if approved. We may also be required to modify our trial plans based on findings in our ongoing clinical studies.trials. In our completed Phase 1 SAD and Phase 1b MAD studytrial of aleniglipron, the following adverse events occurred and were considered probably or possibly related to the studytrial drug: nausea, headache, vomiting, dehydration, decreased appetite, dizziness, and diarrhea. In our completed Phase 2a studytrial of aleniglipron, the following adverse events occurred and were considered probably or possibly related to the studytrial drug: nausea, headache, vomiting, decreased appetite, dyspepsia, and diarrhea. In our aleniglipron ACCESS II study,trial, the following adverse events occurred and were considered probably or possibly related to the studytrial drug: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, constipation and abdominal distention. However, further analysis may reveal AEs inconsistent with the safety results observed. Many compounds that initially showed promise in early-stage testing have later been found to cause side effects that prevented further development of the compound.
In addition, regulatory authorities may draw different conclusions or require additional testing to confirm these determinations. In addition, if any of our product candidates receive marketing approval, the FDA could require us to include a black box warning in our label or adopt a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (“REMS”), to ensure that the benefits outweigh its risks, which may include, among other things, a medication guide outlining the risks of the drug for distribution to patients and a communication plan to health care practitioners. For example, the FDA has required that the product labels of approved drugs targeting GLP-1R include a black box warning related to the risk of thyroid C-cell tumors based on rodent carcinogenicity studies.trials. While we have not yet conducted carcinogenicity studiestrials for aleniglipron, because it also targets GLP-1R, it is possible that absent compelling data to the contrary, the FDA and applicable foreign authorities will similarly require a black box warning for aleniglipron if it is approved for marketing. Furthermore, if we or others later identify undesirable side effects caused by our product candidates, several other potentially significant negative consequences could result, including:
As an organization, we have never conducted later-stage clinical studiestrials or submitted an NDA,NDA and may be unable to do so for any of our product candidates.
We are early in our development efforts for our product candidates, and we will need to successfully complete pivotal clinical studiestrials in order to seek FDA or applicable foreign authority approval to market aleniglipron, ACCG-2671, LTSE-2578,ACCG-3535, ACCG-3535LTSE-2578 and any future product candidates we may develop. Carrying out clinical studiestrials and the submission of NDAs is complicated. We have not conducted any later stage or pivotal clinical studies,trials, have limited experience as a company in preparing, submitting and prosecuting regulatory filings and have not previously submitted an NDA or other applicable foreign regulatory submission for any product candidate. We also plan to conduct a number of clinical studiestrials for multiple product candidates in parallel over the next several years. This may be a difficult process to manage with our limited resources and may divert the attention of management. In addition, we are currently planning for later stage interactions with FDA, and other foreign regulatory agencies; however, we cannot guarantee timely feedback or shift alignment on our clinical trial designs, Phase 3 dose rationale and overall size of the data base needed for any future marketing applications. Consequently, we may be unable to successfully and efficiently execute and complete necessary clinical studiestrials in a way that leads to regulatory submission and approval of any of our product candidates. We may require more time and incur greater costs than our competitors and may not succeed in obtaining marketing approvals of product candidates that we develop. Failure to commence or complete, or delays in, our planned clinical studies,trials, could prevent us from or delay us in submitting NDAs for and commercializing our product candidates.
The time required to reach approval by the FDA and applicable foreign authorities is unpredictable but typically takes many years following the commencement of clinical studiestrials and depends upon numerous factors, including the substantial discretion of the regulatory authorities. In addition, approval policies, regulations, or the type and amount of clinical data necessary to gain approval may change during the course of a product candidate’s clinical development and may vary among jurisdictions. We have not obtained marketing approval for any product candidate and it is possible that any product candidates we may seek to develop in the future will never obtain marketing approval. Neither we nor any future collaborator is permitted to market any of our product candidates in the United States until we receive FDA marketing approval of an NDA.
Prior to obtaining approval to commercialize a product candidate in the United States or abroad, we or our collaborators must demonstrate with substantial evidence from well-controlled clinical studies,trials, and to the satisfaction of the FDA or applicable foreign authorities, that such product candidates are safe and effective for their intended uses. The number of nonclinical studiestrials and clinical studiestrials that will be required for FDA approval varies depending on the product candidate, the disease or condition that the product candidate is designed to address, and the regulations applicable to any particular product candidate. Results from nonclinical studiestrials and clinical studiestrials can be interpreted in different ways. Even if we believe the nonclinical or clinical data for our product candidates are promising, such data may not be sufficient to support approval by the FDA and other regulatory authorities. The FDA and applicable foreign authorities may also require us to conduct additional preclinical studies or clinical studiestrials for our product candidates either prior to or post-approval, or could object to elements of our clinical development program.
We have conducted, or plan to conduct, our initial clinical studiestrials for aleniglipron, ACCG-2671, LTSE-2578,ACCG-3535, ACCG-3535LTSE-2578 and our other product candidates outside of the United States. However, the FDA and other foreign equivalents may not accept data from such studies,trials, in which case our development plans will be delayed, which could materially harm our business.
We have conducted our initial clinical studiestrials for aleniglipron in Australia, and may conduct our Phase 1 studiestrials for other drug candidates in Australia, China or other foreign countries. The acceptance of studytrial data from clinical studiestrials conducted outside the United States or another jurisdiction by the FDA or applicable foreign authority may be subject to certain conditions or may not be accepted at all. In cases where data from foreign clinical studiestrials are intended to serve as the sole basis for marketing approval in the United States, the FDA will generally not approve the application on the basis of foreign data alone unless (i) the data are applicable to the U.S. population and U.S. medical practice; (ii) the studiestrials were performed by clinical investigators of recognized competence and pursuant to good clinical practices (“GCP”) regulations; and (iii) the data may be considered valid without the need for an on-site inspection by the FDA, or if the FDA considers such inspection to be necessary, the FDA is able to validate the data through an on-site inspection or other appropriate means. In addition, even where the foreign studytrial data are not intended to serve as the sole basis for approval, the FDA will not accept the data as support for an application for marketing approval unless the studytrial is well-designed and well-conducted in accordance with GCP requirements and the FDA is able to validate the data from the studytrial through an onsite inspection if deemed necessary. Many foreign regulatory authorities have similar approval requirements. In addition, such foreign studiestrials would be subject to the applicable local laws of the foreign jurisdictions where the studiestrials are conducted. There can be no assurance that the FDA or any applicable foreign authority will accept data from studiestrials conducted outside of the United States or the applicable jurisdiction. If the FDA or any applicable foreign authority does not accept such data, it would result in the need for additional studies,trials, which could be costly and time-consuming, and which may result in current or future product candidates that we may develop not receiving approval for commercialization in the applicable jurisdiction.
We believe that clinical data generated in Australia and China or other foreign countries will be accepted by the FDA and its foreign equivalents; however, there can be no assurance the FDA or applicable foreign authorities will accept data from any other clinical studiestrials that we may conduct in Australia, China or other foreign countries. If the FDA or applicable foreign authorities do not accept any such data, we would likely be required to conduct additional Phase 1 clinical studies,trials, which would be costly and time consuming, and delay aspects of our development plan, which could harm our business.
Conducting clinical studiestrials outside the United States exposes us to additional risks, including risks associated with:
Preliminary, topline and interim data from our clinical studiestrials that we announce or publish from time to time may change as more patient data become available and are subject to audit and verification procedures that could result in material changes in the final data.
From time to time, we may publicly disclose interim, preliminary or topline data from our clinical studies,trials, which are based on a preliminary analysis of then-available data, and the results and related findings and conclusions are subject to change following a more comprehensive review of the data related to the particular study or trial. We also make assumptions, estimations, calculations and conclusions as part of our analyses of data, and we may not have received or had the opportunity to fully and carefully evaluate all data. As a result, the topline or preliminary results that we report may differ from future results of the same studies,trials, or different conclusions or considerations may qualify such results, once additional data have been received and fully evaluated. Topline and preliminary data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the topline or preliminary data we previously made public. As a result, topline and preliminary data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. From time to time, we may also disclose interim data from our clinical studies.trials. Interim data from clinical studiestrials that we may complete are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollment continues and more patient data become available. Adverse differences between topline, preliminary or interim data and final data could significantly harm our business prospects. For example, topline results and the length of the study and sample size may render the results of our prior aleniglipron studiestrials not necessarily indicative of the results for our future clinical studiestrials for aleniglipron and may not be comparable to other weight loss products or product candidates, including other oral selective GLP-1RAs. In addition, given the size of the Phase 2a obesity cohort, the primary efficacy endpoint of weight loss was calculated using LSM and analyzed based on the primary efficacy estimand using a mixed model for repeated measures. This means that we drew on all available data, including data from patients that did not follow-up at 12 weeks. The model estimates how patients with missing data would have responded based on patients who continued the studytrial and had similar baseline characteristics (implicit imputation). Due to the preliminary nature of these results and the length of the studytrial and sample size, these results are not necessarily indicative of the final results for our clinical studiestrials for aleniglipron. If the final data is materially different from the preliminary topline data reported, this could significantly harm our business prospects.
Obtaining and maintaining marketing approval of our product candidates in one jurisdiction does not guarantee that we will be able to obtain or maintain marketing approval in any other jurisdiction. For example, even if the FDA grants marketing approval of a product candidate, it does not mean that comparable regulatory authorities in foreign jurisdictions must also approve the manufacturing, marketing and promotion and reimbursement of the product candidate in those countries. However, a failure or delay in obtaining marketing approval in one jurisdiction may negatively impact the marketing approval process in others. Approval procedures vary among jurisdictions and can involve requirements and administrative review periods different from those in the United States, including additional preclinical studies or clinical studiestrials as clinical studiestrials conducted in one jurisdiction may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions. In many jurisdictions outside the United States, a product candidate must be approved for reimbursement before it can be approved for sale in that jurisdiction. In some cases, the price that we intend to charge for our products is also subject to approval.
Over the last several years, the U.S. government has shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA and the SEC, have had to furlough critical FDA, SEC and other government employees and stop critical activities. In addition, there have recently been terminations of large numbers of federal employees at various federal agencies, including the FDA. Changes and cuts in FDA staffing could result in delays in the FDA’s responsiveness or in its ability to review IND submissions or applications, issue regulations or guidance, or implement or enforce regulatory requirements in a timely fashion, or at all. A prolonged government shutdown and/or employee terminations or resignations could significantly impact the ability of the FDA or other federal agencies to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, future government shutdowns and/or employee terminations or resignations at the SEC could impact our ability to access the public markets and obtain necessary capital in order to properly capitalize and continue our operations.
We do not own or operate manufacturing facilities and have no plans to build our own clinical or commercial scale manufacturing capabilities. We rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third parties for the manufacture of our product candidates and related raw materials for preclinical and clinical development, as well as for commercial manufacture if any of our product candidates receive marketing approval. This reliance increases the risk that we will not have sufficient quantities of our product candidates or products, if approved, or such quantities at an acceptable cost or quality, which could delay, prevent or impair our development or commercialization efforts. Our APIs and drug product for our product candidates are currently provided by a supplier, WuXi STA, a subsidiary of WuXi AppTec, and we expect to rely on this supplier for the foreseeable future. Contract manufacturing organizations may become subject to legislation, trade restrictions, sanctions, and other regulatory requirements by the U.S. government, which could restrict or even prohibit our ability to work with such entities, thereby potentially disrupting the supply of material to us. For example, on December 18, 2025, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026 (the “NDAA”) was signed into law, which includes the BIOSECURE Act that prohibits the U.S. government from procuring biotechnology equipment or services from “biotechnology companies of concern,” and would prohibit U.S. government contracts, loans and grants to any entity that uses biotechnology equipment or services from a designated “biotechnology company of concern.” The Office of Management and Budget will issue a list of “biotechnology companies of concern” no later than mid-December 2026. “Biotechnology company of concern” is defined under the BIOSECURE Act.Act “Biotechnology companies of concern”to include (i) certain companies identified on the U.S. Department of Defense’s “Chinese military companies operating in the United States” list (the “1260H List”), (ii) companies that the Office of Management and alsoBudget authorizes the U.S. government to identify additional entities for inclusiondesignates as a “biotechnology companiescompany of concern” based on certain criteria. Such criteria involvesincluding anwhether the entity that is subject to the administrative governance structure, direction, control, or operates on behalf of a foreign adversary, is involved in the manufacture, distribution, provision, or procurement of a biotechnology equipment or service, and poses a risk to U.S. national security based on engagement with, being supported by, or being affiliated with a foreign adversary’s military, internal security forces, or intelligence agencies and its multiomic data (genomic information) collection and provision practices.practices, Thereand is(iii) acertain “safesubsidiaries harbor”or provisionparent providingor thatsuccessor entities of the restrictionsforegoing. doOn notJune apply8, to2026, equipmentan or services that were formerly but are no longer provided by a “biotechnology company of concern,” as well as a “grandfathering” provision providing that the prohibitions shall not apply for a five-year period to biotechnology equipment or services produced or provided under a contract or agreement entered into before the applicable effective date. With the BIOSECURE Act, we may be restricted in our ability to work with certain Chinese biotechnology manufacturing companiesupdate to the extent1260H weList wouldwas contractissued with,and orWuxi otherwiseAppTec receivewas funding from, the U.S. government. In addition, if we, our suppliers, or our customers wereadded to be designated as a “biotechnology company of concern,” this could potentially cause harm to our business and financial condition. In addition, any U.S. executive action, legislative action or potential sanctions with China could materially impact entities that work with Chinese biotechnology companies. U.S. executive agencies may designate entities and individuals on various governmental prohibited and restricted parties lists. Depending on the designation, potential consequences can range from a comprehensive prohibition on all transactions or dealings with designated parties, or a limited prohibition on certain types of activities, such as exports and financing activities, with designated parties. Such disruption could have adverse effects on the development of our product candidates. We have contracted with, or are in the process of pursuing contracts with, alternative suppliers or manufacturers outside of China for our APIs and drug product for our product candidates. While we believe that our current manufacturing plan will provide us with alternative sources for such supplies, there is a risk that, if supplies are interrupted, or the quality of ingredients provided by such alternative sources is not to our specification, it would cause delays in our supply chain and increase the cost of manufacturing our drugs, which could materially harm our business.list.
There is a “safe harbor” provision in the BIOSECURE Act providing that the restrictions do not apply to equipment or services that were formerly but are no longer provided by a “biotechnology company of concern,” as well as a “grandfathering” provision providing that the prohibitions shall not apply for a five-year period to biotechnology equipment or services produced or provided under a contract or agreement entered into before the applicable effective date. With the BIOSECURE Act, we may be restricted in our ability to work with certain Chinese biotechnology manufacturing companies to the extent we would contract with, or otherwise receive funding from, the U.S. government. In addition, if we, our suppliers, or our customers were to be designated as a “biotechnology company of concern,” this could potentially cause harm to our business and financial condition. In addition, any U.S. executive action, legislative action or potential sanctions with China could materially impact entities that work with Chinese biotechnology companies. U.S. executive agencies may designate entities and individuals on various governmental prohibited and restricted parties lists. Depending on the designation, potential consequences can range from a comprehensive prohibition on all transactions or dealings with designated parties, or a limited prohibition on certain types of activities, such as exports and financing activities, with designated parties. Such disruption could have adverse effects on the development of our product candidates. We have contracted with, or are in the process of pursuing contracts with, alternative suppliers or manufacturers outside of China for our APIs and drug product for our product candidates. While we believe that our current manufacturing plan will provide us with alternative sources for such supplies, there is a risk that, if supplies are interrupted, or the quality of ingredients provided by such alternative sources is not to our specification, it would cause delays in our supply chain and increase the cost of manufacturing our drugs, which could materially harm our business.
We rely on third parties to conduct, supervise and monitor our discovery research, preclinical studies and clinical studies.trials. We have experienced delays due to actions of third parties in the past and if in the future third parties do not satisfactorily carry out their contractual duties or fail to meet expected deadlines, our development programs may be delayed or subject to increased costs, each of which may have an adverse effect on our business and prospects.
We do not currently have the ability to independently conduct certain discovery research, preclinical studies and clinical studiestrials for our product candidates. We rely on CROs and clinical trial sites to ensure the proper and timely conduct of our preclinical studies and clinical studies,trials, and we expect to have limited influence over their actual performance. We rely upon CROs to monitor and manage data for our clinical programs, as well as the execution of future nonclinical studies.trials. We expect to control only certain aspects of our CROs’ activities. Nevertheless, we will be responsible for ensuring that each of our preclinical studies or clinical studiestrials are conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol, legal, regulatory and scientific standards and our reliance on the CROs does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities.
We and our CROs will be required to comply with the good laboratory practices, and GCPs, which are regulations and guidelines enforced by the FDA and applicable foreign authorities in the form of International Conference on Harmonization guidelines for any of our product candidates that are in preclinical and clinical development. The regulatory authorities enforce GCPs through periodic inspections of trial sponsors, principal investigators and clinical trial sites. Although we will rely on CROs to conduct good laboratory practices-compliant preclinical studies and GCP-compliant clinical studies,trials, we remain responsible for ensuring that each of our good laboratory practices preclinical studies and clinical studiestrials is conducted in accordance with its investigational plan and protocol and applicable laws and regulations, and our reliance on the CROs does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. If we or our CROs fail to comply with GCPs, the clinical data generated in our clinical studiestrials may be deemed unreliable and the FDA or applicable foreign authorities may require us to perform additional clinical studiestrials before approving our marketing applications. For example, in September 2023, we announced that topline data from the obesity cohort of our Phase 2a trial of aleniglipron would be delayed because of a data collection omission by a clinical site, where weight was not collected at the final (week 12) visit for 24 of the 40 enrolled participants. Accordingly, if our CROs fail to comply with these regulations or fail to recruit a sufficient number of participants or ensure the collection of requisite data by clinical sites, we may be required to enroll additional participants or repeat clinical studies,trials, which would delay the marketing approval process.
While we will have agreements governing their activities, our CROs will not be our employees, and we will not control whether or not they devote sufficient time and resources to our future clinical and nonclinical programs. These CROs may also have relationships with other commercial entities, including our competitors, for whom they may also be conducting clinical studies,trials, or other drug development activities which could harm our business. We face the risk of potential unauthorized disclosure or misappropriation of our intellectual property by CROs, which may reduce our trade secret protection and allow our potential competitors to access and exploit our proprietary technology. If our CROs do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or obligations, fail to meet expected deadlines, or if the quality or accuracy of the clinical data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our clinical protocols or regulatory requirements or for any other reasons, our clinical studiestrials may be extended, delayed or terminated, and we may not be able to obtain marketing approval for, or successfully commercialize any product candidate that we develop. As a result, our financial results and the commercial prospects for any product candidate that we develop would be harmed, our costs could increase, and our ability to generate revenue could be delayed.
In addition, principal investigators for our clinical studiestrials may serve as scientific advisors or consultants to us from time to time and receive compensation in connection with such services. Under certain circumstances, we may be required to report some of these relationships to the FDA or applicable foreign authorities. The FDA or applicable foreign authorities may conclude that a financial relationship between us and a principal investigator has created a conflict of interest or otherwise affected interpretation of the trial. The FDA or applicable foreign authorities may therefore question the integrity of the data generated at the applicable clinical trial site and the utility of the clinical trial itself may be jeopardized. This could result in a delay in approval, or rejection, of our marketing applications by the FDA or applicable foreign authorities and may ultimately lead to the denial of marketing approval of our current and future product candidates.
In addition to the protection afforded by patents, we seek to rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect proprietary know-how that is not patentable or that we elect not to patent, processes for which patents are difficult to enforce, and any other elements of our product candidates, technology and product discovery and development processes that involve proprietary know-how, information, or technology that is not covered by patents. Any disclosure, either intentional or unintentional, by our employees, the employees of third parties with whom we share our facilities or third-party consultants and vendors that we engage to perform research, clinical studiestrials or manufacturing activities, or misappropriation by third parties (such as through a cybersecurity breach) of our trade secrets or proprietary information could enable competitors to duplicate or surpass our technological achievements, thus eroding our competitive position in our market. Because we expect to rely on third parties in the development and manufacture of our product candidates, we must, at times, share trade secrets with them. Our reliance on third parties requires us to share our trade secrets, which increases the possibility that a competitor will discover them or that our trade secrets will be misappropriated or disclosed.
Even if we obtain any marketing approval for our current or any future product candidates, such approvals will be subject to ongoing regulatory requirements for manufacturing, labeling, packaging, storage, advertising, promotion, sampling, record-keeping and submission of safety and other post-market information. These requirements include submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and reports, registration, as well as on-going compliance with cGMPs and GCPs, for any clinical studiestrials that we may conduct post-approval. Any marketing approvals that we receive for our current or future product candidates may also be subject to a REMS, limitations on the approved indicated uses for which the drug may be marketed or to the conditions of approval, or contain requirements for potentially costly post-marketing testing, including Phase 4 studies,trials, and surveillance to monitor the quality, safety and efficacy of the drug.
A primary trend in the U.S. healthcare industry and elsewhere is cost containment. For example, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) imposes rebates on many Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D products to penalize price increases that outpace inflation on an annual basis.inflation. In addition, HHS has been empowered to negotiate the price of certain single-source drugs that have been on the market for at least seven (7) years covered under Medicare as part of the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program. Each year up to twenty (20) products will be selected by HHS for the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program. Products subject to the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program are expected to experience a significant reduction in reimbursement from the Medicare program on a per unit basis. If coverage and adequate reimbursement are not available, or are available only to limited levels, we may not be able to successfully commercialize our current and any future product candidates that we develop, which could have an adverse effect on our operating results and our overall financial condition.
We are aware of GLP-1R small molecules in development by Eli Lilly, Qilu Regor Therapeutics, AstraZeneca/Eccogene, Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine, Huadong, Sciwind Biosciences, Ascletis, Gilead, Kallyope, MindRank, vTv Therapeutics, Corxel, Carmot Therapeutics (acquired by Roche Group in January 2024) and Kailera Therapeutics, formerly Hercules CM Newco (licensed HRS-7535, an oral small molecule GLP-1; HRS-9531 a GLP-1/GIP; and preclinical asset HRS-4729 from Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine). We have granted Genentech, Inc. and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd (collectively “GNE”) a non-exclusive license to and covenant that we will not assert certain of our patents with respect to the exploitation of CT-996, a GLP-1R small molecule being developed by GNE following its acquisition of Carmot Therapeutics. We will not be able to utilize these patent rights to prevent the commercialization of this competitive molecule if it is successfully developed but we will be eligible for royalties on its sale in patented countries. There are currently approved GLP-1R peptidesagonists for the treatment of diabetes and obesity marketed by Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca and Sanofi. We are also aware of other GLP-1R plus dual/tri incretin targeting peptides in development by Eli Lilly, Jiangsu Hansoh Pharmaceutical Group, Boehringer Ingelheim, Altimmune, Carmot Therapeutics, Sciwind Biosciences, Novo Nordisk, Viking Therapeutics, Amgen, Merck, Zealand Pharma, D&D Pharmatech, GMAX Biopharma, Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine, BrightGene, Innovent Biologics, PegBio, MetaVia Therapeutics, Hanmi Pharmaceuticals, ProGen Co., Pep2Tango, Metsera (acquired by Pfizer in November 2025), QL Biopharma, Lexaria Bioscience, Sun Pharmaceutical, Gan & Lee, Innogen, Biomed Industries, Verdiva Bio and Ascletis. Despite significant biopharmaceutical industry investment, no oral small molecule therapy targeting amylin has been approved for the treatment of diabetes or obesity. We are aware of amylin small molecules in preclinical development by: Eli Lilly, Eccogene, Nxera, Iktos/Cube Biotech strategic collaboration, Alveus Therapeutics, Asceltis,Ascletis, LaeknaLaekna, Corxel and Ambrosia Biosciences. Additionally, we are aware of APJ receptor targeted product candidates in development for COVID 19 acute respiratory distress syndrome by CohBar, Inc.; IPF, systemic sclerosis interstitial lung disease, and kidney nephrotic syndrome by Apie Therapeutics; obesity by Laekna, Prospect Therapeutics, BioAge Labs; and muscle atrophy by BioAge Labs, Inc. Both Amgen and Bristol Myers Squibb (“BMS”) have APJ receptor targeted product candidates for heart failure. Furthermore, we are aware of LPA1R targeted product candidates in development for IPF by BMS, Horizon Therapeutics (acquired by Amgen in October 2023) and DJS Antibodies; and myelin restoration and neuroinflammation by Contineum Therapeutics.
Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries may result in even more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors. Smaller and other early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. These third parties compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific, management and commercial personnel, establishing clinical trial sites and subject registration for clinical studies,trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs. Any failure to compete effectively could harm our business, financial condition and operating results.
In addition, we and any third-party collaborators are facing increasing competition from companies utilizing AI and other computational approaches for drug discovery. Some of these competitors are involved in drug discovery themselves and/or with partners, and others develop software or as well as other tools utilizing AI which can be used, directly or indirectly, in drug discovery. To the extent these other AI approaches to drug discovery prove to be successful, or more successful, than our and any third-party collaborators’ approach, our business, financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected.
Our future growth may depend, in part, on our ability to develop and commercialize our product candidates in foreign markets. We are not permitted to market or promote any of our product candidates before we receive regulatory approval from applicable regulatory authorities in foreign markets, and we may never receive such regulatory approvals for any of our product candidates. To obtain separate regulatory approval in many other countries we must comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements regarding safety and efficacy and governing, among other things, clinical studies,trials, commercial sales, pricing and distribution of our product candidates. If we obtain regulatory approval of our product candidates and ultimately commercialize our products in foreign markets, we would be subject to additional risks and uncertainties, including:
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had 233281 full-time employees. As we advance our research and development programs, we may need to further increase the number of our employees and the scope of our operations, particularly in the areas of clinical development, discovery biology, chemistry, manufacturing, general and administrative matters related to being a public company, regulatory affairs and, if any of our product candidates receives marketing approval, sales, marketing and distribution. To manage any future growth, we must:
Among policy makers and payors in the United States and elsewhere, there is significant interest in promoting changes in healthcare systems with the stated goals of containing healthcare costs, improving quality and/or expanding access. In the United States, the pharmaceutical industry has been a particular focus of these efforts and has been significantly affected by major legislative initiatives. In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (collectively, the “ACA,ACA”) was passed, which substantially changed the way healthcare is financed by both the government and private insurers, and significantly impacts the U.S. pharmaceutical industry.
The current Trump administration is pursuing policies to reduce regulations and expenditures across government including at HHS, the FDA, CMS and related agencies. For example, the current administration has announced agreements with certain pharmaceutical companies that require the drug manufacturers to offer, through a direct-to-consumer platform,platform (TrumpRx), U.S. patients and Medicaid programs prescription drug Most-Favored Nation pricing equal to or lower than those paid in other developed nations, with additional mandates for direct-to-patient discounts and repatriation of foreign revenues. Other recent actions include, for example, (1) directing agencies to reduce workforce and cut programs; (2) directing HHS and other agencies to lower prescription drug costs through a variety of initiatives, including by improving upon the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program and establishing Most-Favored-Nation pricing for pharmaceutical products; (3) imposing tariffs on certain imported pharmaceutical products; and (4) as part of the Make America Healthy Again Commission’s Strategy Report released in September 2025, working across government agencies to increase enforcement on direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising. Additionally, the current administration recently called on Congress to enact “The Great Healthcare Plan,” to codify and expand Most-Favored-Nation pricing, lower government subsidies to private insurance companies, increase healthcare price transparency, expand pharmaceutical drugs available for over-the-counter purchase, and enact restrictions on pharmacy benefit manager payment methodologies, among other things. These actions and policies may significantly reduce U.S. drug prices, potentially impacting manufacturers’ global pricing strategies and profitability, while increasing their operational costs and compliance risks. In June 2024, the Loper decision greatly reduced judicial deference to regulatory agencies, which could increase successful legal challenges to federal regulations affecting our operations. Additionally, Congress may introduce and ultimately pass health care related legislation that could impact the drug approval process and make changes to the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program.
At the state level, legislatures have increasingly passed legislation and implemented regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. For example, on June 15, 2026, the FDA approved Colorado’s Section 804 Importation Program proposal to import certain drugs from Canada for specific state healthcare programs. It is unclear how this and Florida’s similar program, approved by the FDA in 2024, will be implemented and whether they will overcome potential legal, regulatory, or industry challenges in the United States and/or Canada.
We face an inherent risk of product liability exposure related to the testing of our current and any future product candidates in clinical studiestrials and may face an even greater risk if we commercialize any product candidate that we may develop. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against claims that any such product candidates caused injuries, we could incur substantial liabilities. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in:
We currently hold approximately $10.0$15.0 million in product liability insurance coverage in the aggregate. We may need to increase our insurance coverage as we expand our clinical studiestrials and if we successfully commercialize any product candidate. Insurance coverage is increasingly expensive. We may not be able to obtain or maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in an amount adequate to satisfy any liability that may arise. Although we will maintain such insurance, any claim that may be brought against us could result in a court judgment or settlement in an amount that is not covered, in whole or in part, by our insurance or that is in excess of the limits of our insurance coverage. Our insurance policies will also have various exclusions, and we may be subject to a product liability claim for which we have no coverage. We may have to pay any amounts awarded by a court or negotiated in a settlement that exceed our coverage limitations or that are not covered by our insurance, and we may not have, or be able to obtain, sufficient capital to pay such amounts.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”
New heading “Research and Development Expenses”
New heading “General and Administrative Expenses”
New heading “Interest and Other Income, Net”
Removed heading “2024 Follow-On Offering”
Largest changes
Although we did not see a significant financial impact to our business operations as a result of recent geopolitical and macroeconomic developments, such as recent and potential future disruptions in access to bank deposits or lending commitments due to bank failures, tariffs, global pandemics, geopolitical tensions between the United States and China, and various global conflicts for thesee in full comparisonthreesix months endedMarchJune31,30, 2026, there may be potential impacts to our business in the future that are highly uncertain and difficult to predict, including our ability to raise additional funds, disruptions to the supply chain and the manufacture or shipment of drug substances and finished drug products for our product candidates for use in our research, preclinical studies and clinicalstudies,trials, impediments to our clinical trial initiation and recruitment, errors or omissions at our clinical sites and the ability of patients to continue in clinicalstudies,trials, delays in the FDA’s review and approvalprocesses including as a result of recent layoffs,processes, our ability to effectively operate across different geographies in which our offices are located, any increases in interest rates and economic inflation, bank failures, the impact on the global economy due to various global conflicts, higher prices of supplies, tariffs, changes in monetary and fiscal policy, U.S. political developments and other sources of instability and changes in availability and cost of credit and our ability to access capital. The ultimate impact of these geopolitical and macroeconomic factors, as well as any lasting effects on the way we conduct our business, is highly uncertain and subject to continued change, and we recognize that they may continue to present unique challenges for us.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (54)
Our most advanced product candidate to date is aleniglipron, also known as GSBR-1290, an oral small molecule selective glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor (“GLP-1R”) agonist currently in five ongoing clinical studiestrials for the treatment of obesity, overweight and related conditions. We have two oral small molecule amylin receptor agonists: ACCG-2671, which is currently in Phase 1 clinical development, and ACCG-3535, which we have selected as our second amylin development candidate. Our obesity pipeline also includes multiple preclinical discovery stage small molecules targeting glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon receptors. Importantly, these programs have the potential to be developed as monotherapy as well as in fixed dose combination with our backbone GLP-1 or amylin development candidates. These combination products enable us to potentially address diseases beyond obesity including type 2 diabetes mellitus (“T2DM”), heart failure, sleep apnea, chronic kidney disease, osteoarthritis, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (“MASH”) and potentially even addiction and Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease, areas where we are starting to see encouraging data with GLP-1Rs. Our product candidates, as oral small molecules, have the potential to be more accessible medicines than biologics and peptide therapies with potentially differentiated efficacy and safety and, from a manufacturing standpoint, more scalable to meet global demand.
In the fourth quarter of 2024, we initiated the Phase 2b ACCESS study,trial, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-range finding studytrial of aleniglipron in approximately 220 adult participants living with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2), or overweight (BMI ≥ 27 kg/m2) with at least one weight-related comorbidity. Participants startstarted at 5 mg of aleniglipron (or placebo) with a 4-week titration schedule, reaching target doses of 45 mg, 90 mg and 120 mg. The primary endpoint iswas percent change in body weight from baseline to week 36. Secondary endpoints includeincluded safety and tolerability of the monthly titration scheme, as well as PK of aleniglipron. In the fourth quarter of 2024, we initiated a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-range finding Phase 2 studytrial of aleniglipron, known as ACCESS II, in approximately 82 adult participants living with obesity or overweight with at least one weight-related comorbidity. The studytrial iswas designed to evaluate two higher doses of aleniglipron. Participants startstarted at 5 mg of aleniglipron (or placebo) and follow a 4-week titration schedule up to target doses of 120 mg, 180 mg and 240 mg.
In February 2025, we completed enrollment in the ACCESS and ACCESS II studies,trials, and in December 2025, we reported topline data from the ACCESS clinical program including 36-week topline data from the core Phase 2b ACCESS study,trial, 36-week interim data from the exploratory ACCESS II study,trial, interim data from Phase 2 body composition studytrial and Phase 2b ACCESS open label extension (“OLE”) study.trial. In summary, the Phase 2b ACCESS studytrial demonstrated a placebo-adjusted mean weight loss of 11.3% with 120 mg dose at 36 weeks; the exploratory ACCESS II dose exploration studytrial demonstrated a placebo-adjusted mean weight loss of 15.3% at 240 mg at 36 weeks. The tolerability profile reflected the well-known gastrointestinal-related adverse events typical of the GLP-1 class, with a favorable overall discontinuation rate of 10.4%.
In March 2026, we reported topline data from the aleniglipron clinical program including 44-week topline data from the Phase 2 ACCESS II studytrial and interim data from the ongoing body composition studytrial and the ACCESS OLE study.trial. In summary, the Phase 2 ACCESS II studytrial demonstrated a placebo-adjusted mean weight loss of 16.3% (39 Ibs; p<0.0001) at the 180 mg dose and 16.0% (37 Ibs; p<0.0001) at the 240 mg dose at 44 weeks. In the ACCESS OLE study,trial, aleniglipron achieved continued weight loss from 36 weeks, up to 16.2% (40.5 Ibs) with 120 mg after a median follow-up of 20 weeks after the completion of the 36-week double blind treatment period. The ACCESS OLE studytrial is ongoing to evaluate the tolerability profile of the dosing regimen starting at the 2.5 mg dose for those previously on placebo and to collect up to 72 weeks of data exposure to aleniglipron, including 180 mg dose. We anticipate topline results from the ACCESS OLE studytrial in the third quarter of 2026. In addition, the body composition studytrial is ongoing to assess the effect of aleniglipron on body fat loss over a 44-week evaluation period, which includes a 28-week titration period and a starting dose of 2.5 mg and target dose of 180 mg of aleniglipron. The data will be used to inform the size of a sub studytrial into the Phase 3 program. We anticipate topline results from the body composition studytrial in the fourth quarter of 2026.
We believe that the dataData from the ACCESS clinical program supportssupported and informsinformed the advancement toof aleniglipron into Phase 3.3 development. The Company received positive end-of-Phase 2 correspondence from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) and clear guidance on the Phase 3 program. Accordingly, we are on track to initiate the Phase 3 program in the third quarter of 2026, with a starting titration dose of 2.5 mg with the intent to evaluate multiple doses.
In August 2026, we initiated the Phase 3 ACCOMPLISH program, which includes two clinical trials evaluating aleniglipron. ACCOMPLISH-1 will evaluate aleniglipron in adults living with obesity or overweight with a weight-related comorbidity and will enroll up to 3,600 patients. ACCOMPLISH-2 will evaluate aleniglipron in adults living with obesity or overweight and T2DM and will enroll up to 1,100 patients.
ACCOMPLISH-1 and ACCOMPLISH-2 are randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials designed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of three maintenance doses of aleniglipron. Participants in the clinicla trials will be randomized to one of four treatment arms to evaluate three doses (45 mg, 90 mg or 180 mg) or placebo. Participants will begin treatment at a 2.5 mg starting dose of aleniglipron or placebo with a 4-week titration schedule. Together, the ACCOMPLISH clinical trials are designed to support regulatory submissions for aleniglipron in chronic weight management.
In addition, we are conducting an ongoing 30-week studytrial to evaluate the potential to include patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (“T2DM”) with obesity/overweight and a starting dose of 2.5 mg and target dose of 180 mg of aleniglipron. We anticipate data from the T2DM studytrial in the fourth quarter of 2026.
We are also conducting an ongoing SWITCH studytrial to assess the transition or switching from an approved injectable GLP-1 receptor agonist to once-daily oral aleniglipron for weight loss maintenance. This studytrial assesses different aleniglipron starting doses and weight loss maintenance over 12 weeks. We anticipate data from the SWITCH studytrial in the fourth quarter of 2026.
We are advancing our amylin oral small molecule program and have initiated a Phase 1 clinical studytrial of our lead candidate, ACCG-2671 in December 2025. We expect to report initial Phase 1 Single Ascending Dose (“SAD”) studytrial results for ACCG-2671 and advancingadvance it into Phase 2 Multiple Ascending Dose (“MAD”) studytrial in the third quarter of 2026.
In November 2025, we selected a second DACRA development candidate, ACCG-3535. ACCG-3535 is a unique chemical structure from ACCG-2671. Preclinical ACCG-3535 data indicated high binding affinity to human amylin and calcitonin receptors and balanced potency in human amylin and calcitonin receptor functional assays. In addition, ACCG-3535 demonstrated robust food intake suppression and significant, dose-dependent body weight reduction as a monotherapy in diet-induced obese rats. Combination therapy with semaglutide (both concurrently and as a subsequent add-on to semaglutide) resulted in superior weight loss compared to semaglutide or ACCG-3535 monotherapy. We expect to initiate a Phase 1 studytrial for ACCG-3535 in the fourth quarter of 2026.
Beyond our GLP-1R and amylin receptor programs, we are developing next generation oral incretins for potential combination therapy with GLP-1R or amylin candidates. These include small molecule candidates targeting glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (“GIPR”) and GCG receptor (“GCGR”), each designed with customized properties to achieve additional benefit. We believe GLP/GIPR modulation has the potential to provide a differentiated treatment in obesity. In our GCG program, we have identified multiple GCGR agonist and dual GLP-1R/GCGR agonist hits for small molecule GCGR modulation. GCG is primarily expressed in the liver and therefore GCCRGCGR agonists could play an important role in liver-mediated diseases, specifically MASH.
We believe LTSE-2578 is a differentiated oral small molecule because it demonstrated potent in vitro and in vivo activity in preclinical IPF models and dose dependent inhibition of histamine release as the pharmacodynamic marker. We have completed IND-enabling studiestrials including 28-day GLP-toxicology studiestrials in dogs and rats. In July 2025, we completed a Phase 1 single and multiple ascending dose clinical studytrial of LTSE-2578, our oral small molecule antagonist that targets the LPA1R for the treatment of IPF. The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled first-in-human clinical studytrial investigated the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple ascending doses of LTSE-2578. In the study,trial, there werewas no evidence of any dose-dependent LTSE-2578-related adverse events, including clinical, laboratory and electrocardiogram recordings. No serious adverse events were observed. Having completed the Phase 1 study,trial, we are considering strategic alternatives for LTSE-2578 as a Phase 2 ready program in non-metabolic indications.
We outsource clinical drug manufacturing, storage, distribution and quality testing to third-party manufacturers. We believe this strategy allows us to maintain a more efficient infrastructure by eliminating the need for us to invest in our own manufacturing facilities, equipment and personnel while also enabling us to focus our expertise and resources on the design and development of our product candidates. We have established a manufacturing plan in the United States and continue to contract in parallel with additional suppliers in the United States and other regions outside of China to diversify the manufacturing of our active pharmaceutical ingredient and drug product. As our development programs progress and we build new process efficiencies, we expect to continually evaluate this strategy with the objective of satisfying demand for registration studiestrials and, if approved, the manufacture, sale and distribution of commercial products.
We are a Cayman Islands exempted company incorporated with limited liability. We were initially formed as a Delaware limited liability company in 2016 under the name ShouTi Inc., and reorganized as a Cayman Islands exempted company in February 2019. Our primary activities to date have included organizing and staffing our company, business and scientific planning, raising capital, conducting research and development activities, entering into strategic and corporate structuring transactions, enabling manufacturing activities in support of our product candidate development efforts, and establishing our intellectual property portfolio, and providing general and administrative support for these activities. We do not have any product candidates approved for sale and have not generated any revenue from our products. Since our inception, we have incurred net operating losses and negative cash flows from operations. We had net losses of $76.0$182.1 million and $46.8$108.5 million in the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $546.3$652.4 million.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we have cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of $1,458.5$1,342.7 million. We received $100.0 million in the first quarter of 2026 consisting of an upfront license fee for certain patents that cover a class of oral GLP-1 receptor agonists that is different from aleniglipron. Based on our current business plan, we estimate that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments will be sufficient to fund our projected operations and key clinical milestones through the end of 2028. This includes costs related to the ongoing aleniglipron ACCESS OLE, ACCESS II extension study,trial, the supplementary studies,trials, and Phase 3 registrational program in chronic weight management, but excludes additional costs related to pre-commercialization activities including commercial manufacturing. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we may exhaust our available capital resources sooner than we expect.
We expect to continue to incur significant and increasing expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future, particularly if and as we continue to invest in our research and development activities and initiate additional clinical studies,trials, expand our product pipeline, hire additional personnel and invest in and grow our business, maintain, expand and protect our intellectual property portfolio, and seek regulatory approvals for and commercialize any approved product candidates. In addition, we have incurred and expect to continue to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company, including significant legal, audit, accounting, regulatory, consulting, and tax-related services associated with being a public company, compliance with Nasdaq listing and SEC requirements, director and officer insurance premiums and investor relations costs that we did not incur as a private company. As a result, we will need substantial additional capital to develop our product candidates, including to fund Phase 3 clinical studiestrials of aleniglipron, and fund operations for the foreseeable future. Moreover, we may in the future seek to acquire or invest in additional businesses, products, or technologies that we believe could complement or enhance our products, enhance our technical capabilities or otherwise offer growth opportunities, although we currently have no agreements or understandings with respect to any such acquisitions or investments. Until such time as we can generate significant revenue from our products, if ever, we expect to finance our operations through the public or private sale of equity, government or private party grants, debt financings or other capital sources, including potential collaborations with other companies or other strategic transactions. If we are unable to obtain additional funding, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate some or all of our research and development programs, product portfolio expansion or any commercialization efforts, which could adversely affect our business prospects, or we may be unable to continue operations. If we raise funds through strategic collaborations or other similar arrangements with third-parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our platform technology, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates or may have to grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us and/or may reduce the value of our ordinary shares. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with product development, we cannot predict the timing or amount of increased expenses or when or if we will be able to achieve or maintain profitability.
Although we did not see a significant financial impact to our business operations as a result of recent geopolitical and macroeconomic developments, such as recent and potential future disruptions in access to bank deposits or lending commitments due to bank failures, tariffs, global pandemics, geopolitical tensions between the United States and China, and various global conflicts for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, there may be potential impacts to our business in the future that are highly uncertain and difficult to predict, including our ability to raise additional funds, disruptions to the supply chain and the manufacture or shipment of drug substances and finished drug products for our product candidates for use in our research, preclinical studies and clinical studies,trials, impediments to our clinical trial initiation and recruitment, errors or omissions at our clinical sites and the ability of patients to continue in clinical studies,trials, delays in the FDA’s review and approval processes including as a result of recent layoffs,processes, our ability to effectively operate across different geographies in which our offices are located, any increases in interest rates and economic inflation, bank failures, the impact on the global economy due to various global conflicts, higher prices of supplies, tariffs, changes in monetary and fiscal policy, U.S. political developments and other sources of instability and changes in availability and cost of credit and our ability to access capital. The ultimate impact of these geopolitical and macroeconomic factors, as well as any lasting effects on the way we conduct our business, is highly uncertain and subject to continued change, and we recognize that they may continue to present unique challenges for us.
Our research and development activities primarily consist of discovery, engineering and research associated with our product candidates under development, including preclinical studies and clinical studies.trials. Research and development expenses include personnel-related costs for our management, including salaries, bonuses, benefits and share-based compensation expenses, consulting services, clinical trial expenses, regulatory expenses, publications, and allocated overhead expenses, including rent, equipment, depreciation, information technology costs and utilities.
We expect our research and development expenses to continue to account for a significant portion of our operating expenses, and to increase substantially for the foreseeable future as we advance our product candidates into and through preclinical studies and clinical studies,trials, identify new product candidates and potentially pursue regulatory approval of our product candidates. We anticipate that we will make determinations as to which product candidates to pursue and how much funding to direct to each product candidate on an ongoing basis in response to the results of ongoing and future preclinical studies and clinical studies,trials, such as to conduct Phase 3 clinical studiestrials of aleniglipron.
Comparison of the Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025
Research and development expenses increased by $23.6$45.3 million, or 55%,83%, to $66.5$100.1 million during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $42.9$54.7 million during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The increase in research and development expenses was primarily due to increases related to clinical trial costs, preclinical research and development expenses and employee expenses (primarily due to an increase in personnel).
General and administrative expenses increased by $9.4$2.8 million, or 70%,18%, to $22.9$18.6 million during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $13.4$15.7 million during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to increases in employee expenses as we expanded our infrastructure to drive and support the growth in our operations as a publicly-traded company, and increases in professional services.
Interest and other income, net, increased by $4.0$3.8 million to an income of $13.6$12.7 million during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to an income of $9.6$8.9 million during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The increase in interest and other income, net, was primarily due to an increase in interest income from higher cash, cash equivalents and short-term investment balances.
Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025
The following table summarizes our consolidated results of operations for the periods indicated (in thousands):
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses increased by $69.0 million, or 71%, to $166.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $97.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase in research and development expenses was primarily due to increases related to clinical trial costs, preclinical research and development expenses and employee expenses (primarily due to an increase in personnel).
The following table summarizes our research and development expenses for the periods indicated (in thousands):
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased by $12.3 million, or 42%, to $41.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $29.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to increases in employee expenses as we expanded our infrastructure to drive and support the growth in our operations as a publicly-traded company, and increases in professional services.
Interest and Other Income, Net
Interest and other income, net, increased by $7.8 million to $26.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $18.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase in interest and other income, net, was primarily due to an increase in interest income from higher cash, cash equivalents and short-term investment balances.
2024 Follow-On Offering
In June 2024, we issued and sold 10,427,017 ADSs at a price of $52.50 per ADS, including the full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,360,045 additional ADSs, and received $512.7 million in net proceeds, after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses (the “2024 Follow-On Offering”).
In August 2025, we entered into a sales agreement (the “ATM Sales Agreement”) with Leerink Partners LLC and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. (the “ATM Sales Agents”), pursuant to which we may, from time to time, offer and sell our ADSs through the ATM Sales Agents in any manner deemed to be an “at-the-market” offeringoffering, initially up to an aggregate offering price of $250.0 million. In September 2025, we sold 3,040,000 ADSs under the ATM Sales Agreement, for gross proceeds of approximately $58.5 million. The net proceeds after deducting sales commissions to the ATM Sales Agents were approximately $57.1 million, and, after further deducting offering expenses were approximately $55.8 million. In May 2026, we amended and restated the ATM Sales Agreement (the “Amended and Restated Sales Agreement”) to remove the aggregate offering amount of ADSs we may offer and sell thereunder (the “ATM Shares”). In connection with the Amended and Restated Sales Agreement, in May 2026, we filed a prospectus supplement (the “Prospectus Supplement”) to the prospectus filed on August 6, 2025 (the “Prospectus”) with the SEC as part of theour Shelfautomatic Registrationshelf Statement.registration statement on Form S-3. We filed the Prospectus Supplement to increase the ATM Shares available to be sold pursuant to the terms of the Amended and Restated Sales Agreement by an additional $150.0 million, for an aggregate offering price of up to $400.0 million. As of the date of this Quarterly Report, approximately $341.5 million remained available for sale.
In December 2025, we issued and sold (i) 9,961,538 ADSs, including the issuance of 1,500,000 ADSs in connection with the full exercise of the underwriters’ option, and (ii) in lieu of ADSs to certain investors, pre-funded warrants to purchase ordinary shares represented by 1,538,462 ADSs (the “Pre-Funded Warrants”) at a price of $64.9999 per Pre-Funded Warrant, which represents the per ADS public offering price less the $0.0001 per share exercise price for each such Pre-Funded Warrant. We received $701.5 million in net proceeds, after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses (the “2025 Follow-On Offering”). As of March 31, 2026, we had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of $1,458.5 million and an accumulated deficit of $546.3 million.expenses.
As of June 30, 2026, we had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of $1,342.7 million and an accumulated deficit of $652.4 million.
Since our inception, we have incurred net operating losses and negative cash flows from operations. We had net losses of $76.0$182.1 million and $46.8$108.5 million in the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $546.3$652.4 million. Our primary activities to date have included organizing and staffing our company, business and scientific planning, raising capital, conducting research and development activities, entering into strategic and corporate structuring transactions, enabling manufacturing activities in support of our product candidate development efforts, establishing our intellectual property portfolio, and providing general and administrative support for these activities.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of $1,458.5$1,342.7 million. We received $100.0 million in the first quarter of 2026 consisting of an upfront license fee for certain patents that cover a class of oral GLP-1 receptor agonists that is different from aleniglipron. Based on our current business plan, we believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments will be sufficient to fund our projected operations for at least the next 12 months from the date of the issuance of our condensed consolidated financial statements. Further, based on our current business plan, we estimate that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments will be sufficient to fund our projected operations and key clinical milestones through the end of 2028. This includes costs related to the ongoing aleniglipron ACCESS OLE, ACCESS II extension trial, the supplementary trials, and Phase 3 registrational program in chronic weight management, but excludes additional costs related to pre-commercialization activities including commercial manufacturing. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we may exhaust our available capital resources sooner than we expect.
To date, we have not generated any revenue from our products. We do not expect to generate any significant product revenue until we successfully develop and obtain regulatory approval for and commercialize our product candidates, and we do not know when, or if, either will occur. We expect to continue to incur significant and increasing expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future, particularly if and as we continue to invest in our research and development activities and initiate additional clinical studies,trials, expand our product pipeline, hire additional personnel and invest in and grow our business, maintain, expand and protect our intellectual property portfolio, and seek regulatory approvals for and commercialize any approved product candidates. In addition, we have incurred and expect to continue to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company, including significant legal, audit, accounting, regulatory, tax-related, director and officer insurance, investor relations and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. Moreover, we may in the future seek to acquire or invest in additional businesses, products, or technologies that we believe could complement or enhance our products, enhance our technical capabilities or otherwise offer growth opportunities, although we currently have no agreements or understandings with respect to any such acquisitions or investments. We are subject to the risks typically related to the development of new product candidates, and we may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other unknown factors that may adversely affect our business.
We will need substantial additional capital to develop our product candidates, including to fund Phase 3 clinical studiestrials of aleniglipron, and fund operations for the foreseeable future. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:
Until such time as we can generate significant revenue from product sales, if ever, we expect to finance our operations through the public or private sale of equity, government or private party grants, debt financings or other capital sources, including potential collaborations with other companies or other strategic transactions.
Cash Flows Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities
During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, net cash providedused byin operating activities was $15.2$104.9 million, consisting of a net loss of $182.1 million, partially offset by a decrease in net operating assets of $81.6$57.1 million and non-cash charges of $9.6 million, partially offset by a net loss of $76.0$20.2 million. The decrease in net operating assets was primarily due to a decrease in other receivable, partially offset by an increase in prepaid expenses and other assetsnon-current and a decrease in accounts payable.assets. Non-cash charges consisted primarily of share-based compensation, partially offset by net gain from accretion of net investment discounts. The increase in net loss was primarily due to the increase in operating expenses as we invest in our research and development efforts.
During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, net cash used in operating activities was $52.2$106.8 million, consisting of a net loss of $46.8$108.5 million and an increase in net operating assets of $6.8$3.7 million, partially offset by non-cash charges of $1.4$5.4 million. The increase in net loss was primarily due to the increase in operating expenses as we invest in our research and development efforts and operate as a publicly-traded company. Non-cash charges consisted primarily of share-based compensation,compensation and non-cash lease expense, partially offset by net gain from accretion of net investment discounts. The increase in net operating assets was primarily due to an increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets, an increase in other non-current assets and a decrease in accruedoperating expenses and other currentlease liabilities, partially offset by an increase in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and an increase in accounts payable.
During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, net cash used in investing activities was $496.9$422.4 million, consisting primarily of net purchases of short-term investments.
During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, net cash provided by investing activities was $34.0$83.0 million, consisting primarily of net maturities of short-term investments.
Cash Flows (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, net cash used in financing activities was $1.7 million, consisting primarily of payment of taxes on restricted share units withheld for taxes of $2.6 million, partially offset by proceeds from exercise of share options of $0.9 million.
During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025,2026, net cash provided by financing activities was $0.8$0.3 million, consisting primarily of proceeds from exerciseissuance of ordinary shares under employee share optionsplans of $1.0$3.0 million, partially offset by payment of taxes on restricted share units withheld for taxes of $0.2$2.6 million.
During the six months ended June 30, 2025, net cash provided by financing activities was $1.3 million, consisting primarily of proceeds from issuance of ordinary shares under employee share plans of $1.5 million, partially offset by payment of taxes on restricted share units withheld for taxes of $0.2 million.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our contractual obligations consist of facilities lease payments totaling $6.4$6.9 million, with $2.9$3.0 million expected to be paid within the next 12 months. See “Operating Leases” in Note 5 to our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements in Part I. Item 1 “Financial Statements” in this Quarterly Report for additional information.
Our critical accounting policies and estimates are described in Part II. Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Policies” in our Annual Report. There were no material changes to these accounting policies during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
GPCR insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-21 | Coll Crespo Blas |
Conversion |
12,024 | — | — |
| 2026-09-18 | Coll Crespo Blas |
Shares withheld for tax |
10,626 | $11.67 | $124.0K |
| 2026-09-01 | Lin Xichen |
Option exercise |
17,817 | $0.34 | $6.1K |
| 2026-09-01 | Lin Xichen |
Conversion |
17,817 | — | — |
| 2026-08-18 | Lin Xichen |
Conversion |
11,817 | — | — |
| 2026-08-18 | Lin Xichen |
Option exercise |
11,817 | $0.34 | $4.0K |
| 2026-08-06 | Berrios John Joseph |
Grant/award | 140,766 | — | — |
| 2026-08-04 | Lin Xichen |
Option exercise |
11,817 | $0.34 | $4.0K |
| 2026-08-04 | Lin Xichen |
Conversion |
11,817 | — | — |
| 2026-07-14 | Lin Xichen |
Option exercise |
23,634 | $0.34 | $8.0K |
| 2026-07-14 | Lin Xichen |
Conversion |
23,634 | — | — |
| 2026-06-25 | Lin Xichen |
Option exercise |
23,634 | $0.34 | $8.0K |
| 2026-06-25 | Lin Xichen |
Conversion |
23,634 | — | — |
| 2026-04-15 | Lang Matthew |
Grant/award | 184,614 | — | — |
Well-known investors holding GPCR (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 204,156 | $11.0M | 0.01% | Added 13% |
| D. E. Shaw & Co. | 2026-06-30 | 115,300 | $6.2M | 0.0% | Reduced 44% |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 89,568 | $4.8M | 0.0% | Reduced 47% |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 55,800 | $2.7M | — | Sold out |