Companies › GRCE

GRCE 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

Grace Therapeutics, Inc. · Nasdaq · Pharmaceutical Preparations · CIK 1444192 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from Grace Therapeutics, Inc.'s public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

32 / 10risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
5new risk-factor headings
7Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-06-18 (period ending 2026-03-31) with 10-K filed 2025-06-23 (period ending 2025-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

32new paragraphs
10removed paragraphs
49reworded paragraphs
18,817 → 20,444words in section

New heading “We received a Complete Response Letter (CRL) from the FDA citing certain manufacturing deficiencies and other non-clinical issues, which may delay or prevent approval of GTx-104.”

New heading “We face risks related to the growth of artificial intelligence and data analytics.”

New heading “We may not be able to maximize value from our de-prioritized drug candidates, GTx-102 and GTx-101, through either out-licensing or sale.”

New heading “If our current CMO is unable to timely resolve the deficiencies identified by the FDA in the CRL related to GTx‑104, we may be required to engage an alternative manufacturer, which could result in significant delays, increased costs, or our inability to obtain regulatory approval or commercialize GTx‑104 at all.”

New heading “We rely on third parties to conduct our preclinical studies and clinical trials. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or meet expected deadlines, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize our drug candidates, and our business could be substantially harmed.”

Removed heading “We may not be able to maximize value from our de-prioritized drug candidates, GTx-102 and GTx-101, through either development, out-licensing or sale.”

Removed heading “If the FDA does not conclude that our drug candidates satisfy the requirements for the 505(b)(2) regulatory approval pathway, or if the requirements for approval of any of our drug candidates under Section 505(b)(2) are not as we expect, the approval pathway for our drug candidates will likely take significantly longer, cost significantly more and encounter significantly greater complications and risks than anticipated, and in any case may not be successful.”

Removed heading “We rely on third parties to conduct our pre-clinical studies and clinical trials. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or meet expected deadlines, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize our drug candidates, and our business could be substantially harmed.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: investigation, litigation, cybersecurity incident, artificial intelligence
“We have implemented security measures and continue to invest in cybersecurity, but such measures may not be sufficient to prevent all cybersecurity incidents. Cyber threats are evolving in frequency and sophistication, including using artificial intelligence (“AI”), and we may not be able to anticipate or adequately mitigate these risks. For example, threat actors may use AI tools to automate and enhance cybersecurity attacks against us. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: cyberattack, cybersecurity incident, ransomware

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

We rely on information technology systems and third-party service providers to support our business, including our research and development activities, clinical trials, regulatory submissions, manufacturing operations, and corporate functions. Despite the implementation of security measures, our internalinformation computertechnology systems, and those of third parties withon which we contractrely, are vulnerable to damage or interruption from cyber-attacks,events computerincluding viruses,cyber-attacks (including ransomware, malware attacks, unauthorized access,access attempts, and denial of service and other unintentional intrusions or malicious cyberattacks), social engineering (including phishing) or other fraudulent schemes, and other cybersecurity incidents, as well as natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication and electrical failures. These threats may arise from persons inside our organization, authorized persons with access to systems inside our organization or those with whom we do business, or unauthorized individuals. System failures, accidents or securitycybersecurity incidents impacting us or our contractors, consultants, vendors, or other business partners could cause interruptions in our operations and could result in a material disruption of our drug product development and clinical activities and business operations, in addition to possibly requiring substantial expenditures of resources to remedy.address. The loss of drug product development or clinical trial data could result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the data. To the extent that any disruption or security cybersecurity incident were to result in aunauthorized access to, loss or modification of, or damage to, our data or applications, or inappropriateunauthorized disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liability and our development programs, and the development of our product candidatescandidates, could be delayed, which could adversely affect our financial position, results of operations and business. A significant cybersecurity incident may also deter clinical trial participants from participating in any future trials. Furthermore, if our information technology systems, or those of third parties on which we rely, suffer severe damage, disruption or shutdown and our business continuity plans do not effectively resolve the issues in a timely manner, we could experience delays in reporting our financial results or miss reporting deadlines.
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: investigation, penalt

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

We are subject to numerous complex regulatory requirements and failure to comply with these regulations, or the cost of compliance with these regulations, may harm our business.business, or subject us to civil or criminal proceedings, investigations, or penalties and may limit our ability to commercialize our products.
see in full comparison
New text topics: fine, penalt
“The landscape of federal, state, local and foreign privacy laws regulating personal data is constantly evolving, and compliance with these laws requires a flexible privacy framework and substantial resources. Compliance efforts will likely be an increasing and substantial cost in the future and may impose limitations on our business activities. If we fail to comply with applicable requirements, we could be subject to a range of regulatory actions that could affect our ability to commercialize our products candidates. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: artificial intelligence
“We face risks related to the growth of artificial intelligence and data analytics.”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“If the FDA does not conclude that our drug candidates satisfy the requirements for the 505(b)(2) regulatory approval pathway, or if the requirements for approval of any of our drug candidates under Section 505(b)(2) are not as we expect, the approval pathway for our drug candidates will likely take significantly longer, cost significantly more and encounter significantly greater complications and risks than anticipated, and in any case may not be successful.”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (91)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 2 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Added

We received a Complete Response Letter (CRL) from the FDA citing certain manufacturing deficiencies and other non-clinical issues, which may delay or prevent approval of GTx-104.

Added

In April 2026, we received a CRL from the FDA in response to our NDA for GTx-104. The CRL referenced certain items related to the CMC and other non-clinical sections of the application, including items related to additional leachable data time points for commercial product, non-clinical product toxicology risk assessments, and cGMP deficiencies at our CMO. A Type A meeting with the FDA has been scheduled to potentially clarify the path forward and determine the appropriate next steps.

Added

We rely in large part on our CMO to remediate the identified deficiencies, including implementing corrective and preventive actions, and our ability to resolve these issues is subject to factors outside our control. Remediation may require facility upgrades, quality system enhancements, equipment requalification, and additional validation studies or testing, any of which could be costly and time-consuming. We also may be required to generate additional data to support manufacturing changes. If our CMO is unable to adequately or timely remediate the identified deficiencies, we may need to transfer manufacturing operations to an alternative facility, which would involve significant time, expense and regulatory risk. We also may be unable to identify or establish manufacturing at an adequate alternative facility. For additional information on these risks, please see the risk factors captioned “If our current CMO is unable to timely resolve the deficiencies identified by the FDA in its CRL for GTx‑104, we may be required to engage an alternative replacement manufacturer, which could result in significant delays, increased costs, or our inability to obtain regulatory approval or commercialize GTx‑104 at all.” and “We rely on third parties to manufacture commercial and clinical supplies of our drug candidates, and we intend to rely on third parties to manufacture commercial supplies of any approved drug products. The commercialization of any of our drug products could be stopped, delayed, or made less profitable if those third parties fail to provide us with sufficient quantities of active pharmaceutical ingredients, excipients, or drug products, or fail to do so at acceptable quality levels or prices or fail to maintain or achieve satisfactory regulatory compliance.”

Added

If we cannot sufficiently address the issues set forth in the CRL, we may not be able to resubmit the NDA, or resubmission may not result in approval. If we do resubmit the NDA, the FDA may conduct a re-inspection of the applicable CMO, and there can be no assurance that the facility will be found compliant or that additional deficiencies will not be identified. As a result, approval of GTx-104 may be significantly delayed, limited, or may not be obtained at all, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Reworded

From time to time, we may publicly announce the timing of certain events that we expect to occur, such as the anticipated timing of upcomingour newNDA drugresubmission applicationfor filing.GTx-104. These statements are forward-looking and are based on the best estimate of management at the time relating to the occurrence of the events. However, the actual timing of these events may differ from what has been publicly disclosed. The timing of events such as completion of a clinical trial, discovery of a new product candidate, filing or resubmission of an application to obtain regulatory approval, beginning of commercialization of products, completion of a strategic partnership, or announcement of additional clinical trials for a product candidate may ultimately vary from what is publicly disclosed. These variations in timing may occur as a result of different events, including the natureoutcome of CRL remediation efforts or the results obtained during a clinical trial or during a research phase, problems with a supplier or a distribution partner (such as the items identified in CRL we received in April 2026) or any other event having the effect of delaying the publicly announced timeline. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as otherwise required by law. Any variation in the timing of previously announced milestones could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results or the trading price of our common stock.

Added

Our business and future success are substantially dependent on our ability to successfully and timely develop, obtain regulatory approval for, and commercialize our lead product candidate, GTx-104. On April 23, 2026, we received a CRL from the FDA in response to our NDA for GTx‑104. The CRL will delay any potential approval of GTx‑104 unless and until we adequately address the deficiencies to the satisfaction of FDA, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so on a timely basis, or at all. Even if we resubmit the NDA, there can be no assurance that the FDA will determine our response adequately addresses the deficiencies identified in the CRL, will not identify additional deficiencies upon resubmission, or will approve the NDA.

Added

Any delay or setback in our NDA resubmission, any requirement to conduct additional work (including new studies or manufacturing activities), any adverse findings from an FDA inspection of our CMO, or any additional FDA requests following resubmission would extend the period before which we could potentially obtain approval for GTx-104, commercialize GTx‑104, and generate any product revenue. Failure to obtain approval of GTx-104 would adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects, including by limiting our ability to execute our strategy, potentially requiring us to scale back operations, and increasing our need for additional financing on terms that may be dilutive or otherwise unfavorable.

Reworded

Our business and future success are substantially dependent on our ability to successfully and timely develop, obtain regulatory approval for, and commercialize our lead product candidate, GTx-104. Any delay or setback in the development of GTx-104 could adversely affect our business. Our planned development, approval and commercialization of GTx-104 may fail to be completed in a timely manner or at all. As part of our strategic realignment plan, we determined to focus primarily on the development of GTx-104, which concentrates the level of our drug development risk on one drug candidate. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to obtain approval for GTx-104 or any other of our drug candidates from the FDA or any foreign regulatory authority or that we will obtain such approval in a timely manner.

Removed

We may not be able to maximize value from our de-prioritized drug candidates, GTx-102 and GTx-101, through either development, out-licensing or sale.

Removed

Our GTx-102 and GTx-101 drug candidates are at an earlier development stage than GTx-104 and will require additional time and resources to develop. As part of our strategic realignment plan, we determined to focus primarily on the development of GTx-104 and to de-prioritize the development of GTx-102 and GTx-101. While we will continue to seek ways to maximize the value of GTx-102 and GTx-101, including through subsequent development, out-licensing or sale, we may not be successful in doing so.

Reworded

We may not be able to maintain our operations and advance our research and development and if approved, commercialization of our GTx-104 lead drug candidate without additional funding.

Reworded

Our current assets, as of March 31, 2025,2026, are projected to support our current liabilities as at that date when combined with the projected level of our expenses through at least twelve months from the issuance date of the audited consolidated financial statements included with this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including expenses in connection with the potential resubmission of the NDA for GTx-104, pre-commercialworking planning, commercial team buildout,capital and productother launchgeneral ifcorporate GTx-104purposes. is approved. We expect that additionalAdditional capital will be required by us to support the commercial launch of GTx-104, if approved. To fully execute our business plan, we plan to raise the necessary capital primarily through additional securities offerings and multiple sources of non-dilutive capital, such as grants orgrants, loans and strategic alliances. Therefore, if we determine to continue development of GTx-102 and GTx-101, significant additional funding will be needed.

Added

We cannot be certain that additional funding will be available when needed on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to raise additional capital in sufficient amounts, when required or on acceptable terms, we also could be required to:

Added

seek out-licensing or commercialization partners to assist in the commercialization of GTx-104, if approved;

Added

delay, limit or reduce the commercialization of GTx-104, if approved; or significantly curtail our operations.

Reworded

We are highly dependent on the principal members of our executive team. While members of our executive team have significant industry experience, they have not been with the Company for long. Any of our executive officers could leave our employment at any time, as all of our employees are “at will” employees. Recruiting and retaining qualified employees for our business, including scientific and technical personnel, will also be critical to our success. There is currently a shortage of skilled executives and other personnel in our industry, which is likely to continue. As a result, competition for skilled personnel is intense and the turnover rate can be high. As we build our organization in accordance with our strategic realignment,organization, we may not be able to attract and retain personnel on terms that are favorable to us given the competition among numerous pharmaceutical companies for individuals with similar skill sets. In addition, failure to succeed in clinical studies or regulatory approvals may make it more challenging to recruit and retain qualified personnel. The inability to recruit key executives or the loss of the services of any executive or key employee might impede the progress of our development and commercialization objectives.

Added

withdrawal of clinical study participants;

Added

costs due to related litigation;

Added

distraction of management’s attention from our primary business;

Reworded

withdrawal of clinical study participants costs due to related litigation distraction of management’s attention from our primary business substantial monetary awards to patients or other claimants; and the inability to commercialize our product candidates.

Reworded

Our current product liability insurance coverage may not be sufficient to reimburse us for any expenses or losses we may suffer. Moreover, insurance coverage is becoming increasingly expensive, and, in the future, we may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in sufficient amounts to protect us against losses due to liability. AAny successful product liability claims or series of claims brought against us could cause our stock price to decline and, if judgments exceed our insurance coverage, could adversely affect our results of operations and business.

Reworded

We rely on information technology systems and third-party service providers to support our business, including our research and development activities, clinical trials, regulatory submissions, manufacturing operations, and corporate functions. Despite the implementation of security measures, our internalinformation computertechnology systems, and those of third parties withon which we contractrely, are vulnerable to damage or interruption from cyber-attacks,events computerincluding viruses,cyber-attacks (including ransomware, malware attacks, unauthorized access,access attempts, and denial of service and other unintentional intrusions or malicious cyberattacks), social engineering (including phishing) or other fraudulent schemes, and other cybersecurity incidents, as well as natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication and electrical failures. These threats may arise from persons inside our organization, authorized persons with access to systems inside our organization or those with whom we do business, or unauthorized individuals. System failures, accidents or securitycybersecurity incidents impacting us or our contractors, consultants, vendors, or other business partners could cause interruptions in our operations and could result in a material disruption of our drug product development and clinical activities and business operations, in addition to possibly requiring substantial expenditures of resources to remedy.address. The loss of drug product development or clinical trial data could result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the data. To the extent that any disruption or security cybersecurity incident were to result in aunauthorized access to, loss or modification of, or damage to, our data or applications, or inappropriateunauthorized disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liability and our development programs, and the development of our product candidatescandidates, could be delayed, which could adversely affect our financial position, results of operations and business. A significant cybersecurity incident may also deter clinical trial participants from participating in any future trials. Furthermore, if our information technology systems, or those of third parties on which we rely, suffer severe damage, disruption or shutdown and our business continuity plans do not effectively resolve the issues in a timely manner, we could experience delays in reporting our financial results or miss reporting deadlines.

Added

In addition, we depend on third parties, including CROs and CMOs, and other vendors, to conduct significant aspects of our operations. Any cybersecurity incident affecting these third parties could have similar adverse effects on us, and we may have limited ability to monitor or control their cybersecurity measures.

Added

We have implemented security measures and continue to invest in cybersecurity, but such measures may not be sufficient to prevent all cybersecurity incidents. Cyber threats are evolving in frequency and sophistication, including using artificial intelligence (“AI”), and we may not be able to anticipate or adequately mitigate these risks. For example, threat actors may use AI tools to automate and enhance cybersecurity attacks against us. We use software and platforms designed to detect such cybersecurity threats, including AI-based tools, but these threats could become more sophisticated and harder to detect and counteract, which may pose significant risks to our data security and systems. Any actual or perceived cybersecurity incident could also result in regulatory scrutiny or investigations, litigation, reputational harm, and significant costs. Additionally, while we have implemented security measures that we believe are appropriate and continue to enhance cybersecurity protections, a regulator could deem our security measures not to be appropriate given the lack of prescriptive measures in certain laws. Increased regulation of data collection, use and retention practices, including self-regulation and industry standards, changes in existing laws and regulations, enactment of new laws and regulations, increased enforcement activity, and changes in interpretation of laws, could increase our cost of compliance and operation, limit our ability to grow our business or otherwise harm our business.

Reworded

Disruptions at the FDA, the SEC and other government agencies caused by the U.S. presidential administration, funding shortages or global health concerns could hinder their ability to hire and retain key leadership and other personnel, prevent or delay new products and services from being developed, approved, or commercialized in a timely manner or otherwise prevent those agencies from performing normal business functions on which the operation of our business may rely, which could negatively impact our business.

Reworded

The ability of the FDA to review and approve new products or review other regulatory submissions can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, a reduction in the FDA’s workforce and its ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees, shifting policy priorities as a result of changes in the U.S. presidential administration and political appointees tasked to oversee the agency,priorities, and statutory, regulatory and policy changes. In addition, government funding of the FDA, SEC and other government agencies on which our operations may rely, including those that fund research and development activities, is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable.

Reworded

Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also increase the time to meet with and receive agency feedback, accept, review and/or approve our submissions, conduct inspections, issue regulatory guidance, or take other actions that facilitate the development, approval and marketing of regulated products, which would adversely affect our business. In addition, government proposals to reduce or eliminate budgetary deficits may include reduced allocations to the FDA and other related government agencies. For example, over the last several years, the U.S. government has shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA and the SEC, have had to furlough critical FDA, SEC and other government employees and stop critical activities. Further, the current U.S. presidential administration recently established the Department of Government Efficiency, which implemented a federal government hiring freeze and announced certain additional efforts to reduce federal government employee headcount and the size of the federal government. It is unclear how thesecertain executive actions or other potential actions by the current U.S. presidential administration or other parts of the federal government will impact the FDA or other regulatory authorities that oversee our business. These budgetary pressures may reduce the FDA’s ability to perform its responsibilities. If a significant reduction in the FDA’s workforce occurs, the FDA’s budget is significantly reduced or a prolonged government shutdown occurs, or if global health concerns prevent the FDA or other regulatory authorities from conducting business as usual or conducting inspections, reviews or other regulatory activities, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA to timely review and process our regulatory submissions or take other actions critical to the development or marketing of our product candidates, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Reworded

Unfavorable global economicgeopolitical conditionsevents and geopoliticaleconomic events,conditions, including asmilitary aconflicts result ofand trade tensions between the U.S. and its global trading partners, including China, could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations, including conduct of our clinical trials and our manufacturing activities.

Reworded

Our results of operations could be adversely affected by general conditions in the global economy and in the global financial markets. The financial markets and the global economy may also be adversely affected by the current or anticipated impact of military conflict, including the ongoing conflictconflicts in the Middle East and between Russia and Ukraine, terrorism or other political events, including as a result of trade tensions between the U.S. and its global trading partners, including China. Sanctions imposed by the U.S. and other countries in response to conflicts, including in Ukraine,conflicts may also adversely impact the financial markets and the global economy, and any economic countermeasures by the affected countries or others could exacerbate market and economic instability. We have conducted business outside of the U.S. in the past and may do so in the future. Clinical trials for our product candidates outside of the U.S. and unfavorable economic conditions resulting in the weakening of the U.S. dollar would make those clinical trials more costly to operate. Furthermore, a severe or prolonged economic downturn, higher inflation and interest rates, political disruption or other geopolitical events, including an expansion of thecurrent conflict between Russia and Ukraine or instigation of otherglobal military conflicts, could result in a variety of risks to our business, including weakened demand for our product candidates or any future product candidates, if authorized or approved, and our ability to raise additional capital when needed on acceptable terms, if at all.

Reworded

A weak or declining economy or political disruption, including any international trade disputes, or changes in laws or policies governing the terms of international trade, and in particular increased trade restrictions, tariffs or taxes on imports from countries where we manufacture products could strain our manufacturers or suppliers, possibly resulting in supply disruption or increased manufacturing and distribution costs. For example, in 2025, the U.S. has imposed or threatened tariffs on certain imports from Canada, Mexico and China. Historically, tariffs have led to increased trade and political tensions. In response to tariffs, other countries have implemented retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods. Political tensions as a result of trade policies and tariff uncertainty could reduce trade volume, investment, technological exchange and other economic activities between major international economies, resulting in a material adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets.

Added

Several U.S. states have proposed and passed consumer privacy laws. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act, includes certain transparency and other requirements to protect personal data and grants California consumers with certain rights regarding their personal data. In addition, California consumers have the right to bring a private right of action in connection with data security incidents involving certain elements of personal data. Additionally, other jurisdictions have enacted similar legislation and/or regulations. Health-specific consumer privacy laws have also passed in multiple states.

Reworded

WeAdditionally, we have conducted business outside the U.S. in the past and may do so in the future. These activities subject us to additional data protection authority oversight and require us to comply with stringent local and regional data privacy laws, including the EU’s General Data Protection Regulations (the "GDPR").GDPR. The GDPR has a wide range of compliance obligations relating to the processing and protection of personal data, including obligations to having a lawful basis for processing personal data (which may in certain situations require explicit consent of data subjects), providing detailed information about the processing activities, dealing with restrictions on sharing of personal data with third parties and the transferring of personal data out of the EU, having contractual arrangements in place where required (such as with clinical trial sites and vendors), reporting in certain instances personal data breaches to data protection authorities and/or affected individuals, appointing data protection officers, conducting data protection impact assessments, responding to privacy rights requests and keeping records of processing activities. Violations of the GDPR carry significant financial penalties for noncompliance (including possible fines of up to 4% of global annual turnover for the preceding financial year or €20 million, whichever is higher). The GDPR also confers a private right of action on data subjects and consumer associations to lodge complaints with data protection authorities, seek judicial remedies, and obtain compensation for damages resulting from violations of the GDPR.

Added

The landscape of federal, state, local and foreign privacy laws regulating personal data is constantly evolving, and compliance with these laws requires a flexible privacy framework and substantial resources. Compliance efforts will likely be an increasing and substantial cost in the future and may impose limitations on our business activities. If we fail to comply with applicable requirements, we could be subject to a range of regulatory actions that could affect our ability to commercialize our products candidates. We may also be subject to fines, penalties or private actions in the event of non-compliance with such laws. Any threatened or actual government enforcement action could also generate adverse publicity and could result in additional regulatory oversight. Moreover, despite our efforts, the possibility of security incidents occurring cannot be eliminated entirely and there can be no assurance that any measures we take will prevent such events that could adversely affect our business due, in part, to the ever-changing threat landscape. Additionally, we rely on third party vendors and service providers to support various aspects of our business operations. These third parties may pose risks related to data security, compliance, and contractual obligations. A failure by a third party to adequately protect our data could have adverse consequences for our business and reputation.

Added

We face risks related to the growth of artificial intelligence and data analytics.

Added

AI is being adopted rapidly by the biotechnology industry. Companies like ours have been using AI, machine learning, and data analytics tools in aspects of their operations, including target identification, clinical trial design, and regulatory and operational support. Should we continue to adopt these tools, they may not perform as intended and may produce inaccurate, incomplete, or biased outputs. Any such deficiencies could adversely affect our development decisions, clinical trial execution, regulatory submissions, or commercialization strategy, and could result in increased costs, delays, or failure to obtain or maintain regulatory approval for our product candidates.

Added

The regulatory framework governing the use of AI and automated tools in drug development is evolving and uncertain. Regulatory authorities, including the FDA, may impose new requirements or expectations regarding the validation, transparency, or use of such technologies, including in connection with NDAs. Any failure to comply with applicable requirements or to adequately document and validate our use of these tools could delay or adversely affect regulatory review or approval of our product candidates.

Added

In addition, our use of AI depends on third-party data, software, and infrastructure. We may be subject to risks relating to data quality, data access restrictions, intellectual property claims, and cybersecurity incidents. Any disruption, limitation, or compromise of these inputs could impair our ability to use such tools effectively and could adversely affect our business.

Added

Finally, our competitors may adopt AI technologies more effectively than we do, which could enhance their development efficiency and competitive position relative to ours.

Added

We may not be able to maximize value from our de-prioritized drug candidates, GTx-102 and GTx-101, through either out-licensing or sale.

Added

Our GTx-102 and GTx-101 drug candidates are at an earlier development stage than GTx-104 and will require additional time and resources to develop. As part of our strategic realignment plan, we determined to focus primarily on the development of GTx-104 and to de-prioritize the development of GTx-102 and GTx-101. While we will continue to seek ways to maximize the value of GTx-102 and GTx-101, through out-licensing or sale, we may not be successful in doing so.

Removed

Several U.S. states have proposed and passed consumer privacy laws. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act, includes certain transparency and other requirements to protect personal data and grants California consumers with certain rights regarding their personal data. In addition, California consumers have the right to bring a private right of action in connection with data security incidents involving certain elements of personal data. Additionally, other jurisdictions, such as Virginia, Colorado, Utah, and Connecticut, have enacted similar legislation and/or regulations. Health-specific consumer privacy laws were also passed in multiple states, including Washington and Nevada. These laws and regulations are constantly evolving and may impose limitations on our business activities.

Removed

If we fail to comply with applicable federal, state, local, or foreign regulatory requirements, we could be subject to a range of regulatory actions that could affect our ability to commercialize our products. Any threatened or actual government enforcement action could also generate adverse publicity and could result in additional regulatory oversight.

Removed

If the FDA does not conclude that our drug candidates satisfy the requirements for the 505(b)(2) regulatory approval pathway, or if the requirements for approval of any of our drug candidates under Section 505(b)(2) are not as we expect, the approval pathway for our drug candidates will likely take significantly longer, cost significantly more and encounter significantly greater complications and risks than anticipated, and in any case may not be successful.

Removed

We intend to seek FDA approval through the 505(b)(2) regulatory pathway for our lead drug candidate GTx-104. The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, also known as the Hatch-Waxman Act, added Section 505(b)(2) to the FDCA. Section 505(b)(2) permits the filing of an NDA where at least some of the information required for approval comes from studies that were not conducted by or for the applicant.

Removed

If the FDA does not allow us to pursue the 505(b)(2) regulatory pathway for GTx-104, we may need to conduct additional clinical trials, provide additional data and information and meet additional standards for regulatory approval. If this were to occur, the time and financial resources required to obtain FDA approval for our drug candidates would likely substantially increase. Moreover, an inability to pursue the 505(b)(2) regulatory pathway could result in new competitive products reaching the market faster than our drug candidates, which could materially adversely impact our competitive position and prospects. Even if we are allowed to pursue the 505(b)(2) regulatory pathway for a drug candidate, we cannot assure you that we will receive the requisite or timely approvals for commercialization of such drug candidate.

Removed

In addition, it is possible that our competitors may file citizens’ petitions with the FDA in an attempt to persuade the FDA that our drug candidates, or the clinical studies that support their approval, contain deficiencies. Such actions by our competitors could delay or even prevent the FDA from approving any NDA that we submit under Section 505(b)(2).

Reworded

Clinical testing, even when utilizing the 505(b)(2) pathway, is expensive and can take many years to complete, and its outcome is inherently uncertain. Failure can occur at any time during the clinical trial process, even with active ingredients that have previously been approved by the FDA as safe and effective. The results of pre-clinicalpreclinical studies and early clinical trials of our drug candidates may not be predictive of the results of later stage clinical trials. A number of companies in the biopharmaceutical industry have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials due to lack of efficacy or adverse safety profiles, notwithstanding promising results in earlier trials.

Reworded

Our drug candidates are in various stages of development. Clinical trial failures may occur at any stage and may result from a multitude of factors both within and outside our control, including flaws in formulation, adverse safety or efficacy profile and flaws in trial design, among others. If the trials result in negative or inconclusive results, we or our collaborators may decide, or regulators may require us, to discontinue trials of our drug candidates or conduct additional clinical trials or pre-clinicalpreclinical studies. In addition, data obtained from trials and studies are susceptible to varying interpretations, and regulators may not interpret our data as favorably as we do, which may delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. For these reasons, our future clinical trials may not be successful.

Reworded

delays in reaching agreement on acceptable terms with prospective contractCMOs, manufacturing organizations (“CMOs”), or contract research organizations (“CROs”),CROs, and clinical trial sites, or failure by such CMOs to complete the manufacturing of clinical trial materials or CROs to follow and carry out the clinical study protocol at each site in accordance with the terms of our agreements with them;

Reworded

delays in obtaining required institutional review board (“IRB”),IRB, approval at each site;

Reworded

If initiation or completion of our plannedany clinical trials is delayed for any of the above reasons or other reasons, our development costs may increase, ourthe regulatory approval process could be delayed and our ability to commercialize and commence sales of our drug candidates could be materially harmed, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Reworded

In addition, identifying and qualifying patients to participate in clinical trials of our drug candidates is critical to our success. The timing of our clinical trials depends on the speed at which we can recruit patients to participate in testing our drug candidates as well as completion of required follow-up periods. We may not be able to identify, recruit and enroll a sufficient number of patients, or those with required or desired characteristics or to complete our clinical trials in a timely manner. Patient enrollment isis, and completion of the trials are affected by a variety of factors, including:

Reworded

This lengthy approval process as well as the unpredictability of future clinical trial results may result in us failing to obtain regulatory approval to market our drug candidates, which would harm our business, results of operations and prospects significantly. For example, in April 2026, we received a CRL from the FDA in response to our NDA for GTx-104. The CRL referenced certain items related to the CMC and other non-clinical sections of the application, including items related to additional leachable data time points for commercial product, non-clinical product toxicology risk assessments, and cGMP deficiencies at our CMO. The development of our product candidates also may be delayed by other events beyond our control. For example, actions to limit federal agency budgets or personnel, may result in reductions to the FDA’s budget, employees, and operations, as well as changes to FDA regulatory programs, all of which may lead to slower response times and longer review periods, potentially affecting our ability to progress development of our product candidates, undergo regulatory inspections or obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates.

Reworded

No uniform policy for coverage and reimbursement for products exists among third-party payors in the United States. The Medicare and Medicaid programs increasingly are used as models in the United States for how private payors and other governmental payors develop their coverage and reimbursement policies for drugs and biologics. Some payors may require pre-approval of coverage for new or innovative devices or drug therapies before they reimburse healthcare providers who use such therapies. Coverage and reimbursement for products can differ significantly from payor to payor, and one payor’s decision to cover a product does not ensure that other payors will also provide similar coverage. It is difficult to predict at this time what payors will decide with respect to the coverage and reimbursement for our commercializedproducts, products.if approved and commercialized.

Reworded

our ability to set a price that we desire for our drug products, if any are approved our ability to generate revenues and achieve profitability;

Added

our ability to generate revenues and achieve profitability;

Reworded

In the United States and other jurisdictions, there have been, and we expect there will continue to be, a number of legislative and regulatory changes to the healthcare system that could impact the future results of our operations. In particular, there have been and continue to be a number of initiatives at the U.S. federal and state levels with the stated objective to reduce healthcare costs and improve the quality of healthcare. For example, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the “ACA”) substantially changed the way healthcare is financed by both governmental and private insurers. The ACAAffordable Care Act and its implementation continue to evolve as a result of legislative, administrative, and judicial developments. Further changes remain possible, which may potentially negatively affect pricing, coverage, or reimbursement for any products, if approved.

Reworded

In addition to the ACA,Affordable Care Act, U.S. governments continue to seek to adopt healthcare policies and reforms intended to curb healthcare costs, such as federal or state controls on payment for drugs (including under Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial health plans). For example, the Budget Control Act of 2011 resulted in aggregate reductions, or sequestration, of Medicare payments to providers. Under current legislation, after a brief pause and reduction to 1% due to COVID-19, sequestration is currently set at 2% through the first 7 months of 2032. In January 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 was signed into law, which, among other things, adjusted Medicare payments to several types of providers, including hospitals, imaging centers and cancer treatment centers, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years.

Reworded

MoreThe recently, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “IRA”) requires, among other things, the U.S. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (the “HHS”) to negotiate, with respect to Medicare units and subject to a specified cap, the price of a set number of certain high spend Medicare Part B and D drugs and biologicals per year, with prices taking effect starting in 2026. Failures to comply with requirements under the drug price negotiation program could subject us to an excise tax and/or a civil monetary penalty. The program excludes drugs with an orphan drug designation that are not approved for any indications unrelated to that designation. In addition, the IRA establishesestablished a Medicare Part B inflation rebate scheme, under which manufacturers will owe rebates to Medicare if, generally speaking, the average sales price of a Part B drug increases faster than the pace of inflation. The failure to timely pay an inflation rebate may result in a civil monetary penalty. The IRA and any other similar laws introduced in the future may result in additional reductions in Medicare and other healthcare funding, which could negatively affect our future revenues and results of operations.

Added

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed into law on July 4, 2025, is projected to decrease federal health care spending by approximately $1 trillion by reducing Medicaid spending and enrollment and making changes to federal Medicare spending.

Showing the first 60 of 91 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

6new paragraphs
8removed paragraphs
17reworded paragraphs
4,284 → 4,291words in section

New heading “General and administrative expenses”

Removed heading “Research and development expenses”

Removed heading “Restructuring Costs”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: restructuring
“Restructuring Costs”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: restructuring

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

General and administrative expenses were $8,672 for the year ended March 31, 2026, an increase of $1,504 from $7,168 for the year ended March 31, 2025, an increase of $484 from $6,684 for the year ended March 31, 2024.2025. The increase was primarily adriven resultby of$799 in non-recurring legal and due diligence costs incurred in connection with strategic initiatives evaluated during the period, as well as increased legal, tax, accountingprofessional fees and other professionalgeneral feesand administrative costs of $890 primarily related to pre-commercial theplanning Continuancefor and Domestication, increased salaries and benefits due to merit increases and hiring of a new employee,GTx-104, offset in part by a decrease in othersalaries and expensesbenefits dueof $251 primarily to adjustments for Canadian goods and services tax and a decrease in miscellaneous expenses as a result of restructuringdecreased inheadcount. Stock-based compensation of $580 for the prior year period.ended Stock-basedMarch compensation31, of2026, decreased by $66 compared to $514 for the year ended March 31, 2025, decreased by $201 compared to $715 for the year ended March 31, 2024.2025. The decreaseincrease was primarily due to fewermore stock option awards granted during the year ended March 31, 2025.2026.
see in full comparison
New text topics: fine
“Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended March 31, 2026 was $3,713, compared to $14,032 for the year ended March 31, 2025, a decrease of $10,319. The net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended March 31, 2026, was attributable to the $4,040 net proceeds received from the exercise of the 2023 Common Warrants offset by payment of stock issuance costs $327 from the 2023 Private Placement (defined below) which occurred in September 2023. …”
see in full comparison
New text
“General and administrative expenses”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“Research and development expenses”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: restructuring

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

The net loss of $7,793 or $0.47 loss per share for the year ended March 31, 2026, decreased by $1,775 from the net loss of $9,568 or $0.79 loss per share for the year ended March 31, 2025, decreased by $3,285 from the net loss of $12,853 or $1.35 loss per share for the year ended March 31, 2024.2025. The decrease in net loss was primarily due to a $5,946 difference$2,318 decrease in change in fair value of derivative warrant liabilities, a $1,485 $7,106 decrease in restructuring costs, and a $1,367 increase in income tax benefits, partially offset by a $4,828 increase in research and development expenses, net of government assistance,and a $484$1,499 decrease in income tax benefit, partially offset by a $1,504 increase in general and administrative expenses and a $200 decrease in interest and other income, net.expenses.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (31)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 10 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

This management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) is presented in order to provide the reader with an overview of the financial results and changes to our financial position as atof March 31, 20252026 and for the year then ended. This MD&A explains the material variations in our operations, financial position and cash flows for the years ended March 31, 20252026 and 2024.2025.

Reworded

In February 2025, we completed a private placement of Company securities with certain institutional and accredited investors. Net proceeds to the Company were $13,705. Refer to Note 8,7, Stockholders’ Equity - 2025 Private Placement, in the accompanying consolidated financial statements elsewhere in this document for additional information. We believe our existing cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to sustain planned operations through at least 12 months from the issuance date of thesethe consolidated financial statements included with this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Reworded

The net loss of $7,793 or $0.47 loss per share for the year ended March 31, 2026, decreased by $1,775 from the net loss of $9,568 or $0.79 loss per share for the year ended March 31, 2025, decreased by $3,285 from the net loss of $12,853 or $1.35 loss per share for the year ended March 31, 2024.2025. The decrease in net loss was primarily due to a $5,946 difference$2,318 decrease in change in fair value of derivative warrant liabilities, a $1,485 $7,106 decrease in restructuring costs, and a $1,367 increase in income tax benefits, partially offset by a $4,828 increase in research and development expenses, net of government assistance,and a $484$1,499 decrease in income tax benefit, partially offset by a $1,504 increase in general and administrative expenses and a $200 decrease in interest and other income, net.expenses.

Removed

Research and development expenses

Reworded

fees paid to external service providers such as contract research organizations ("CROs") and contract manufacturing organizations ("CMOs") related to clinical trials, including contractual obligations for clinical development, clinical sites, manufacturing and scale-up, and formulation of clinical drug supplies; and salaries and related expenses for research and development personnel, including expenses related to stock options.

Removed

fees paid to contract service providers related to drug discovery efforts including chemistry and biology services; and salaries and related expenses for research and development personnel, including expenses related to stock options.

Reworded

Our research and development during the yearyears ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 waswere focused primarily on our clinical development program for our GTx-104 drug candidate. Research and development expenses during the year ended March 31, 2024, were focused primarily on our clinical development programs GTx-104, GTx-102, and GTx-101 drug candidates.

Reworded

Total research and development expenses for the year ended March 31, 20252026 were $9,511,$2,405, compared to $4,683$9,511 for the year ended March 31, 2024.2025. This increasedecrease of $4,828$7,106 was primarily due to the increasedecrease in research activities for GTx-104 of $7,542 driven by the close-out of the GTx-104 pivotal Phase 3 safety clinical trial.trial during the first calendar quarter of 2026 offset by a $436 increase in external consulting and data management costs incurred in support of the NDA of GTx-104 which was submitted to the FDA in June 2025.

Added

Salaries and benefits of $1,249 for the year ended March 31, 2026 increased by $440 compared to $809 for the year ended March 31, 2025. The increase was primarily due to salary and bonus increases of $350 as well as increased benefits costs of $55.

Added

Stock-based compensation of $218 for the year ended March 31, 2026, increased by $2 compared to $216 for the year ended March 31, 2025.

Added

General and administrative expenses

Removed

There were no government grants and tax credits for the year ended March 31, 2025, compared to $55 for the year ended March 31, 2024. The changes within government grants and tax credits in the prior year were due to adjustments of provisions regarding realizability of credit receivables after assessments and correspondences from tax authorities.

Removed

Stock-based compensation of $216 for the year ended March 31, 2025, increased by $18 compared to $198 for the year ended March 31, 2024. The increase was primarily due to the issuance of new stock option awards during the year ended March 31, 2025.

Reworded

General and administrative expenses were $8,672 for the year ended March 31, 2026, an increase of $1,504 from $7,168 for the year ended March 31, 2025, an increase of $484 from $6,684 for the year ended March 31, 2024.2025. The increase was primarily adriven resultby of$799 in non-recurring legal and due diligence costs incurred in connection with strategic initiatives evaluated during the period, as well as increased legal, tax, accountingprofessional fees and other professionalgeneral feesand administrative costs of $890 primarily related to pre-commercial theplanning Continuancefor and Domestication, increased salaries and benefits due to merit increases and hiring of a new employee,GTx-104, offset in part by a decrease in othersalaries and expensesbenefits dueof $251 primarily to adjustments for Canadian goods and services tax and a decrease in miscellaneous expenses as a result of restructuringdecreased inheadcount. Stock-based compensation of $580 for the prior year period.ended Stock-basedMarch compensation31, of2026, decreased by $66 compared to $514 for the year ended March 31, 2025, decreased by $201 compared to $715 for the year ended March 31, 2024.2025. The decreaseincrease was primarily due to fewermore stock option awards granted during the year ended March 31, 2025.2026.

Removed

Restructuring Costs

Removed

On May 8, 2023, we announced our decision to terminate a substantial amount of our workforce as part of a plan intended to align our organizational and management cost structure to prioritize resources to GTx-104, thereby reducing losses to improve cash flow and extend available cash resources. We incurred $1,485 of related costs primarily consisting of employee severance costs. There were no restructuring costs for the year ended March 31, 2025.

Reworded

The decrease in the fair value of derivative warrant liabilities for the year ended March 31, 20252026 of $5,946$2,318 was mainly attributable to the decreasesettlement inof the warrant liability as the 2023 Common Warrants (defined below) expired on October 21, 2025, which was the 60th day after the date of the acceptance by the FDA of the NDA for our stockproduct price.candidate GTx-104.

Reworded

Interest and other income, net was $685 for the year ended March 31, 2026, compared to $711 for the year ended March 31, 2025, compared to $911 for the year ended March 31, 2024.2025. The $200$26 decrease in our interest and other income was due to withdrawals of short-term investments upon their maturity used to fund operations, and a decrease in interest rates.

Reworded

Income tax benefit was $3,199$1,700 for the year ended March 31, 2025, an increase of $1,3672026, compared to $1,832$3,199 for the year ended March 31, 2024,2025, duereflecting toa netdecrease lossesof recognized$1,499. byThe ourdecrease primarily subsidiary,resulted Gracefrom Therapeuticsupdated U.S.,drug Inc.,commercialization timelines, which arereduced the deemedprojected tofuture betax recoverable to usliability and can be taken asgenerated a corresponding income tax benefit overof time.the same amount.

Reworded

In February 2025, we completed a private placement of our securities with certain institutional and accredited investors. Net proceeds to us were $13,705. Refer to Note 8,7, Stockholders’ Equity - 2025 Private Placement in the accompanying consolidated financial statements elsewhere in this document for additional information. We believe our existing cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to sustain planned operations through at least 12 months from the issuance date of the consolidated financial statements included with this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Reworded

Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended March 31, 20252026 was $14,904,$8,869, compared compared to $12,333$14,904 for the year ended March 31, 2024,2025, ana increasedecrease of $2,571.$6,035. The The increasedecrease in net cash used in operating activities was primarily due to a $7,106 $4,828 increasedecrease in research and development activities fordue to the completion of our GTx-104 pivotal Phase 3 STRIVE-ON trial,trial in the first fiscal quarter of 2026, partially offset by a $484$1,504 increase in general and administrative expenses for legal, tax, accountingconsulting and other professional fees primarily related to the Continuance and Domestication, changes in prepaid expenses of $485, offset in part by a $1,485 decrease in restructuring costs, change in receivables of $516 and change in trade and other payables of $1,568.fees.

Reworded

Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended March 31, 2025, was from$0 due to our purchase of short-term investments of $15 and maturity of short-term investments of $15. NetThere cashwere used in no investing activities for the year ended March 31, 2024, was from the purchase of short-term investments of $6,554, proceeds from the sale of equipment of $111, offset by proceeds from short-term investments of $6,569 and proceeds from the sale of equipment of $22.2026.

Added

Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended March 31, 2026 was $3,713, compared to $14,032 for the year ended March 31, 2025, a decrease of $10,319. The net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended March 31, 2026, was attributable to the $4,040 net proceeds received from the exercise of the 2023 Common Warrants offset by payment of stock issuance costs $327 from the 2023 Private Placement (defined below) which occurred in September 2023. Net cash provided by financing activities of $14,032 for the year ended March 31, 2025, was primarily attributable to the $14,999 gross proceeds received from the 2025 Private Placement (defined below) which occurred in February 2025, offset by stock issuance costs of $967.

Removed

Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended March 31, 2025, was attributable to the $13,705 net proceeds received from the 2025 private placement. Net cash provided by financing activities of $7,359 for the year ended March 31, 2024, was primarily attributable to the $7,338 net proceeds received from the 2023 private placement.

Reworded

In February 2025, we agreed to offer and sell in a private placement (the “2025 Private Placement”) an aggregate of 3,252,132 shares of Common Stock, at a purchase price of $3.395 per share of Common Stock (the “2025 Private Placement Shares”), and pre-funded warrants to purchase up to 1,166,160 shares of Common Stock, at a purchase price equal to the purchase price per 2025 Private Placement Share less $0.0001 (the “2025 Pre-Funded Warrants”). Each 2025 Pre-Funded Warrant is exercisable for one share of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.0001 per share, is exercisable immediately and will expire once exercised in full. For each 2025 Private Placement Share and 2025 Pre-Funded Warrant issued, we agreed to issue to each purchaser an accompanying common warrant to purchase shares of Common Stock (or 2025 Pre-Funded Warrants in lieu thereof), exercisable for an aggregate of 4,418,292 shares of Common Stock (or 2025 Pre-Funded Warrants in lieu thereof) (the “2025 Common Warrants”). Each 2025 Common Warrant is exercisable for one share of Common Stock at an exercise price of $3.395 per share, is immediately exercisable and will expire on the earlier of (i) the 60th day after the date the FDA approves the NDA for GTx-104 and (ii) September 25, 2028. The 2025 Private Placement closed on February 11, 2025. The net proceeds to us from the 2025 Private Placement were $13,705, after deducting fees and expenses.

Reworded

In September 2023, we entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with certain institutional and accredited investors in connection with a private placement offering of our securities (the “2023 Private Placement”). Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, we sold 1,951,371 Common Shares, at a purchase price of $1.848 per Common Share and pre-funded warrants (the “2023 Pre-Funded Warrants”) to purchase up to 2,106,853 Common Shares at a purchase price equal to the purchase price per Common Share less $0.0001. Each 2023 Pre-Funded Warrant is exercisable for one Common Share at an exercise price of $0.0001 per Common Share, is immediately exercisable, and will expire once exercised in full. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, we also issued to such institutional and accredited investors common warrants (the “2023 Common Warrants”, and together with the 2023 Pre-Funded Warrants, the “Warrants”) to purchase Common Shares, exercisable for an aggregate of 2,536,391 Common Shares. Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, for each Common Share and each 2023 Pre-Funded Warrant issued in the 2023 Private Placement, an accompanying five-eighths (0.625) of a Common Warrant was issued to the purchaser thereof. Each whole Common Warrant iswas exercisable for one Common Share at an exercise price of $3.003 per Common Share, iswas immediately exercisable, and willwould expire on the earlier of (i) the 60th day after the date of the acceptance by the FDA of an NDA for our product candidate GTx-104 and (ii) five years from the date of issuance. The 2023 Private Placement closed on September 25, 2023. The net proceeds to us from the 2023 Private Placement were $7,338, after deducting fees and expenses. In October 2025, we received $4,040 in net proceeds from exercises of 1,345,464 2023 Common Warrants that were issued in the 2023 Private Placement. for 1,345,464 shares of Common Stock. The remaining 1,190,927 2023 Common Warrants issued in the 2023 Private Placement expired on October 21, 2025, in accordance with their terms as the 60th day after the FDA’s acceptance for review of our NDA for GTx-104 had passed.

Reworded

Research and developments expenditures are expensed as incurred. These costs consist of employees’ salaries and benefits related to research and development activities, contractors and consultants that conduct the Company’sour clinical trials, laboratory material and small equipment, clinical trial materials, stock-based compensation expense, and other non-clinical costs and regulatory fees. The Company accruesWe accrue research and development expenses based on work performed, which relies on estimates of total costs incurred based on patient enrollment and completion of patient studies, invoices received and contracted costs. Advance payments for goods and services that will be used in future research and development are recognized in prepaids or other assets and are expensed when the services are performed, or the goods are used.

Reworded

We expectbelieve our existing cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to havesustain sufficientplanned operations cashthrough resourcesat toleast satisfy our objectives into the third calendar quarter of 2026, which is 1312 months from the issuance date of the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere inwith this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We require additional capital to fund our daily operating needs beyond that time. We plan to raise additional capital prior to that time in order to maintain adequate liquidity. NegativeThe deficiencies identified in the CRL, negative results from studies, if any, and depressed prices of our common stock could impact our ability to raise additional financing. Raising additional equity capital is subject to market conditions not within our control. If we do not raise additional funds in this time period, we may not be able to realize our assets and discharge our liabilities in the normal course of business.

Added

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40) (“ASU 2024-03”), to improve the disclosures about a public business entity’s expenses and address requests from investors for more detailed information about the types of expenses (including purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, amortization and depletion) in commonly presented expense captions (such as cost of sales, SG&A and research and development).

Added

ASU 2024-03 applies to all public business entities and is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The requirements will be applied prospectively with the option for retrospective application. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect of adopting this new guidance on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

Removed

In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-07, “Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures” (“ASU 2023-07”). The ASU includes enhanced disclosure requirements, primarily related to significant segment expenses that are regularly provided to and used by the chief operating decision maker ("CODM"). The amendments are to be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. ASU 2023-07 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. Our adoption of the requirements of ASU 2023-07 at March 31, 2025 did not result in a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-08-13 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-02-12 (period ending 2025-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

0new paragraphs
0removed paragraphs
0reworded paragraphs
15 → 15words in section

The section in the latest 10-Q reads in full:

There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report.

No wording changes found in this section.

Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

36new paragraphs
60removed paragraphs
42reworded paragraphs
8,535 → 6,898words in section

New heading “2026 Private Placement”

New heading “Change in fair value of derivative warrant liabilities”

New heading “2026 Private Placement”

Removed heading “About Ataxia Telangiectasia”

Removed heading “Market Opportunity”

Removed heading “Pharmacokinetic Data”

Removed heading “About Postherpetic Neuralgia (PHN)”

Removed heading “Market Potential”

Removed heading “Research and development expenses, net of government assistance”

Removed heading “(expressed in thousands)”

Removed heading “Income tax benefit”

Removed heading “2023 Private Placement”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: fine
“PHN is neuropathic pain due to damage caused by the varicella zoster virus (“VZV”). Infection with VZV causes two distinct clinical conditions. Primary VZV infection causes varicella (i.e., chickenpox), a contagious rash illness that typically occurs among young children. Secondary VZV can reactivate clinically, decades after initial infection, to cause herpes zoster (“HZ”), otherwise known as shingles. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“Research and development expenses, net of government assistance”
see in full comparison
New text
“Change in fair value of derivative warrant liabilities”
see in full comparison
New text topics: investigation
“We have licensed the data from the multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial from Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy, where Dr. Zannolli et. al. studied the effect of oral liquid solution of betamethasone to reduce ataxia symptoms in patients with A-T. This oral liquid solution is not marketed in the United States and therefore is not available for clinical use. Currently, betamethasone is only available in the United States as an injectable or as a topical cream. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: investigation
“We have licensed the data from the multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial from Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy, where Dr. Zannolli et al. studied the effect of oral liquid solution of betamethasone to reduce ataxia symptoms in patients with A-T. This oral liquid solution is not marketed in the United States, and therefore is not available for clinical use. Currently, betamethasone is only available in the United States as an injectable or as a topical cream. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“About Postherpetic Neuralgia (PHN)”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (138)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 1 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsOperation

Reworded

This management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) is presented in order to provide the reader with an overview of the financial results and changes to our financial position as at DecemberJune 31,30, 20252026 and for the three and nine months then ended. This MD&A also explains the material variations in our operations, financial positions and cash flows for the three and nine months ended DecemberJune 31,30, 20252026 and 2024.2025.

Reworded

Market data, and certain industry data and forecasts included in this MD&A were obtained from internal Company surveys and market research conducted by third parties hired by us, publicly available information, reports of governmental agencies and industry publications, and independent third-party surveys. We have relied upon industry publications as our primary sources for third-party industry data and forecasts. Industry surveys, publications, and forecasts generally state that the information they contain has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but that the accuracy and completeness of that information are not guaranteed. We have not independently verified any of the data from third-party sources or the underlying economic assumptions they have made. Similarly, internal surveys, industry forecasts and market research, which we believe to be reliable based upon our management’s or contracted third parties’ knowledge of our industry, have not been independently verified. Our estimates involve risks and uncertainties, including assumptions that may prove not to be accurate, and these estimates and certain industry data are subject to change based on various factors, including those discussed in this quarterly report and in our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K,10-K for the year ended March 31, 2026, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on June 23,18, 20252026 (the “Annual Report”). This MD&A contains forward-looking information. You should review our Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements presented at the beginning of this quarterly report.

Reworded

This MD&A should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements for the three and nine months ended DecemberJune 31,30, 20252026 and 20242025 included elsewhere in this quarterly report. Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Reworded

We believe rare disorders represent an attractive area for drug development, and there remains an opportunity for us to utilize already approved drugs that have established safety profiles and clinical experience to potentially address significant unmet medical needs. A key advantage of pursuing therapies for rare disorders is the potential to receive orphan drug designation (“ODD”) from the FDA. Our three drug candidates have received ODD status and, provided certain conditions are met at new drug application approval, those candidates, if approved, will be entitled to orphan drug exclusivity (“ODE”), which blocks FDA from approving for seven years any other application for a product that is the same drug for the same orphan indication, except in limited circumstances, such as a showing of clinical superiority to the product with ODE. ODD status can also result in tax credits of up to 25% of clinical development costs conducted in the United States upon marketing approval and a waiver of the New Drug Application (“NDA”) fees, which we estimate can translate into savings of approximately $4.3 million for our lead drug candidate, GTx-104. Developing drugs for rare diseases can often allow for clinical trials that are more manageably scaled and may require a smaller, more targeted commercial infrastructure.

Added

GTx-104 is a clinical stage, novel, injectable formulation of nimodipine being developed for IV infusion in aSAH patients to address significant unmet medical needs. The unique nanoparticle technology of GTx-104 facilitates aqueous formulation of insoluble nimodipine for a standard peripheral IV infusion.

Added

In April 2026, the FDA issued a Complete Response Letter (“CRL”) in response to our NDA submission for GTx-104. The CRL referenced certain items in the CMC and non-clinical sections of the application, which we believe can be addressed in a resubmission of the NDA. The items cited by the FDA include the current good manufacturing practice (“cGMP”) compliance status of our contract manufacturer. This is a facility-level matter, and not a GTx-104 product-specific quality finding. The CRL also cited additional leachables data time points and excipient toxicology risk assessments. The CRL did not identify any clinical safety or efficacy deficiencies and did not request additional clinical data. We intend to address each of the CRL items in our planned resubmission, including completing the required non-clinical studies.

Added

Following a Type A meeting with the FDA regarding the CRL, we received the FDA’s official meeting minutes constituting the official record of the meeting. The plan described below reflect our planned approach to addressing the items cited in the CRL following the Type A meeting and our review of the official minutes.

Added

We have initiated a dual-source manufacturing strategy for GTx-104 to mitigate potential remediation issues from our current contract manufacturer and provide flexibility, while continuing to address the remaining CMC and nonclinical items identified in the CRL. As such, a technology transfer to a second, U.S.-based contract manufacturer is already underway. The timing of NDA resubmission will reflect the manufacturing pathway that reaches readiness first: either (i) the U.S.-based facility, which would require completion of a full CMC package supported by 12 months of stability data following the technology transfer; or (ii) our current contract manufacturer, if it successfully remediates its FDA compliance issues and is able to support the NDA sooner. Additional information regarding the CRL and the Company's regulatory activities is provided below.

Added

2026 Private Placement

Added

In August 2026, we entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “2026 Purchase Agreement”) with certain institutional and accredited investors in connection with a private placement of shares of our Common Stock (the “2026 Private Placement”). Pursuant to the 2026 Purchase Agreement, we offered and sold in the 2026 Private Placement an aggregate of 4,761,904 shares of Common Stock at a purchase price of $2.10 per share. The net proceeds to us from the 2026 Private Placement were approximately $9,100, after deducting fees and expenses.

Removed

On June 25, 2025, we announced the submission of a New Drug Application (“NDA”) to the FDA for GTx-104, a clinical-stage, novel, injectable formulation of nimodipine being developed for intravenous (“IV”) infusion to address significant unmet medical needs in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (“aSAH”) patients. On August 22, 2025 the FDA accepted our NDA for review and established April 23, 2026 as the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) target date for completing its review of our submission.

Removed

On September 18, 2025 we announced that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued a U.S. Patent No. 12,414,943, titled “Nimodipine Parenteral Administration”. The new method of use patent, published on September 16, 2025, covers the dosing regimen for IV administration of nimodipine used in the Phase 3 STRIVE-ON safety trial for GTx-104.

Removed

This new patent enhances our multi-layered intellectual property estate for GTx-104, which includes five patents on the composition of our formulation of nimodipine, providing patent protection to 2037. The new patent on the IV dosing regimen for GTx-104 strengthens our intellectual property position and extends protection to 2043.

Removed

In September 2025, results from our STRIVE-ON trial were presented at the 2025 Neurocritical Care Society annual meeting, held in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The Neurocritical Care Society is the only professional society representing multi-disciplinary teams of neurocritical care providers around the world whose mission is to improve outcomes for patients with life-threatening neurological illnesses. In an oral presentation titled Safety and Tolerability of GTx-104 (Nimodipine Injection for I.V. Infusion) Compared with Oral Nimodipine in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: a Prospective, Randomized Trial, Dr. H. Alex Choi (Professor of Neurosurgery and Neurology at UT Health Houston McGovern Medical School, member of the Grace Scientific Advisory Board) highlighted the trial results demonstrating the safety and tolerability of GTx-104 in the treatment of aSAH.

Removed

During our second fiscal quarter, we conducted market research analysis to update our assessment of the GTx-104 commercial opportunity and to guide our commercialization planning. We believe the results of this research confirm that GTx-104 is seen as valuable for its improved tolerability, potential cost savings, and simpler route of IV administration compared to the oral form of nimodipine.

Reworded

GTx-104 is a clinical stage, novel, injectable formulation of nimodipine being developed for IV infusion in aSAH patients to address significant unmet medical needs. The unique nanoparticle technology of GTx-104 facilitates aqueous formulation of insoluble nimodipine for a standard peripheral IV infusion. GTx-104 provides a convenient IV delivery of nimodipine in the Intensive Care Unit potentially eliminating the need for nasogastric tube administration in unconscious or dysphagic patients. IVIntravenous delivery of GTx-104 also has the potential to lower food effects, drug-to-drug interactions, and eliminate potential dosing errors. Further, GTx-104 has the potential to better manage hypotension in aSAH patients. GTx-104 has been administered in over 200 patients and healthy volunteers and was well tolerated with significantly lower inter- and intra-subject pharmacokinetic variability compared to nimodipine oral nimodipine.capsules.

Reworded

GTx-101 is a topical bio adhesive film-forming bupivacaine spray for Postherpetic Neuralgia (“PHN”), which can be persistent and often causes debilitating pain following infection by the shingles virus. Four single-dose Phase 1 studiestrials to evaluate the PK, safety, dose proportionality and tolerability of GTx-101 have been performed. In these trials, no serious adverse events were reported and GTx-101 was well tolerated. We believe that GTx-101 could be administered to patients with PHN to treat pain associated with the disease. In May 2023, we implemented a strategic realignment plan to enhance shareholder value that resulted in engaging a new management team, streamlining our research and development activities, and greatly reducing our workforce. Following the realignment, we are a smaller, more focused organization, based in the United States, and concentrated on the development of our lead product candidate GTx-104. Further development of GTx-102 and GTx-101 will occur at such a time when we are able to secure additional funding or enter strategic partnerships for license or sale with third parties.

Added

In May 2023, we implemented a strategic realignment plan that resulted in engaging a new management team, streamlining our research and development activities, and greatly reducing our workforce. Following the realignment, we are concentrating on the development of our lead product candidate GTx-104. In June 2026, we decided to not resume internal development funding for GTx-102 or GTx-101 under our current operating plan.

Removed

We have worldwide commercialization rights for all our pipeline drug candidates and plan to maximize the value of each of our drug candidates over time.

Reworded

About aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (aSAH) aSAH is bleeding over the surface of the brain in the subarachnoid space between the brain and the skull, which contains blood vessels that supply the brain. A primary cause of such bleeding is the rupture of an aneurysm in the brain. aSAH is characterized by high mortality (up to 25% early mortality) and significant potential of neurological decline (approximately 40%). The result is a relatively uncommon type of stroke that accounts for about 5% of all strokes and an estimated 42,500 U.S. hospital treated patients per year. Patients are typically hospitalized for two to four weeks following aSAH, with the most severe cases extending to a month or more. Due to the length of hospital stay and disproportionately high mortality and morbidity, aSAH has significant cost of care impact.

Added

In contrast to more common types of ischemic stroke in elderly individuals, aSAH often occurs at a relatively young age, with approximately half the affected patients younger than 60 years old. Approximately 10% to 15% of aSAH patients die before reaching the hospital, and those who survive the initial hours post hemorrhage are admitted or transferred to tertiary care centers with high risk of complications, including rebleeding and systemic manifestations affecting cardiovascular, pulmonary, and renal function.

Reworded

Unmet Needs with Nimodipine Oral NimodipineCapsules

Reworded

Nimodipine was granted FDA approval in 1988 and is the only approved drug that has been clinically shown to improve neurological outcomes in aSAH patients. It is only available in the United States as a generic oral capsule, generic oral liquid solution and as a branded oral liquid solution called NYMALIZE™, which is manufactured and sold by Arbor Pharmaceuticals (acquired in September 2021 by Azurity Pharmaceuticals), and as a generic oral liquid solution.. Nimodipine has poor water solubility and high permeability characteristics because of its high lipophilicity. Additionally, orally administered nimodipine has dose-limiting side-effects such as hypotension, poor absorption and low bioavailability resulting from high first-pass metabolism, and a narrow administration window as food effects lower bioavailability significantly. Due to these issues, blood levels of orally administered nimodipine can be highly variable, making it difficult to manage blood pressure in aSAH patients, often leading to frequent dose interruptions. Nimodipine capsules are also difficult to administer, particularly to unconscious patients or those with impaired ability to swallow, while the oral liquid solution has tolerability challenges due to solubility limitations of nimodipine.

Reworded

GTx-104 provides a convenient IV delivery of nimodipine in the Intensive Care Unit,Unit potentially eliminating the need for nasogastric tube administration in unconscious or dysphagic patients. Intravenous delivery of GTx-104 also has the potential to lower food effects, drug-to-drug interactions, and eliminate potential dosing errors. Further, GTx-104 has the potential to better manage hypotension in aSAH patients. GTx-104 has been administered in over 200 patients and healthy volunteers and was well tolerated with significantly lower inter- and intra-subject pharmacokinetic variability compared to nimodipine oral nimodipine.capsules.

Reworded

GTx-104 is designed to address significant unmet medical needs for patients with aSAH. We believe that ourthis novel nimodipine IV formulation may offer a potential value to physicians, hospitals, and their patients.

Reworded

The STRIVE-ON trial was a prospective, randomized open-label Phase 3 trial of GTx-104 compared with nimodipine oral nimodipinecapsules in patients hospitalized with aSAH. 50 patients were administered GTx-104 and 52 patients received nimodipine oral nimodipine.capsules. The primary endpoint was the number of patients with at least one episode of clinically significant hypotension reasonably considered to be caused by the drug, and additional endpoints included safety, clinical, and pharmacoeconomic outcomes. Each patient was evaluated for up to 90 days inclusive of the 21-day treatment period. There was a higher proportion of the most severe cases of aSAH (Hunt & Hess Grade V) with the worst prognosis in the GTx-104 arm (8%) compared to the nimodipine oral nimodipinecapsule arm (2%).

Reworded

On September 25, 2024, we announced the completion of enrollment in our Phase 3 STRIVE-ON trial for GTx-104. On February 10, 2025, we announced the trial met its primary endpoint and provided evidence of clinical benefit for GTx-104 compared to orallynimodipine administeredoral nimodipine.capsules. Patients receiving GTx-104 were observed to have a 19% reduction in at least one incidence of clinically significant hypotension compared to nimodipine oral nimodipinecapsules (28% versus 35%). Other measures also favored or were comparable to GTx-104, including:

Reworded

54% of patients who received GTx-104 had a relative dose intensity of 95% or higher of the prescribed dose compared to only 8% on nimodipine oral nimodipine.capsules .

Reworded

29% relative increase in the number of patients receiving GTx-104 compared to nimodipine oral nimodipinecapsules with favorable outcomes at 90 days follow up on the modified Rankin scale. Quality of life as measured by EQ-5D-3L also favored patients receiving GTx-104 versus nimodipine oral nimodipine.capsules .

Reworded

Fewer intensive care unit (ICU) readmissions, ICU days, and ventilator days for patients receiving GTx-104 versus nimodipine oral nimodipine.capsules .

Reworded

Adverse events were comparable between the two arms and no new safety issues were identified with patients receiving GTx-104. All deaths in both arms of the trial were due to severity of the patient’s underlying disease. There were eight deaths on the GTx-104 arm compared to four deaths on the nimodipine oral nimodipinecapsule arm. The survival status of one patient on the nimodipine oral nimodipinecapsule arm was unknown. No deaths were determined to be related to GTx-104 or nimodipine oral nimodipine.capsules.

Reworded

PharmacoeconomicFurthermore, pharmacoeconomic measures favored the use of GTx-104 for patients with aSAH.

Removed

On June 25, 2025, we announced the submission of our NDA to the FDA for GTx-104. On August 22, 2025, the FDA accepted our NDA for review and established April 23, 2026 as the PDUFA target date for completing its review of our submission.

Removed

In September 2025, results from our STRIVE-ON trial were presented by Dr. H. Alex Choi (Professor of Neurosurgery and Neurology at UT Health Houston McGovern Medical School, member of the Grace Scientific Advisory Board) at the 2025 Neurocritical Care annual meeting, held in Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Reworded

We believe these data validate the GTx-104 value proposition. If approved, GTx-104 has the potential to address significant challenges with nimodipine oral nimodipinecapsule administration and may transform the standard of care for patients with aSAH.

Reworded

In September 2021, we initiated our pharmacokinetic (“PK”) bridging trial to evaluate the relative bioavailability of GTx-104 compared to currently marketed nimodipine oral nimodipine capsules in approximately 50 healthy subjects. This PK trial established the 505(b)(2) regulatory pathway for GTx-104.

Reworded

Final results from this PK trial were reported in May 2022, and showed that the bioavailability of GTx-104 compared favorably with thenimodipine oral formulation of nimodipinecapsules in all subjects, and no serious adverse events were observed for GTx-104.

Reworded

In this trial, allAll endpoints indicated that statistically there was no difference in exposures between GTx-104 and nimodipine oral nimodipinecapsules over the defined time periods for both maximum exposure and total exposure. Plasma concentrations obtained following IV administration showed significantly less variability between subjects as compared to nimodipine oral administration of capsules because IV administration is not as sensitive to some of the physiological processes that affect oral administration, such as taking the drug with and without meals, variable gastrointestinal transit time, variable drug uptake from the gastrointestinal tract into the systemic circulation, and variable hepatic blood flow and hepatic first pass metabolism. Previous studies have shown these processes significantly affect the oral bioavailability of nimodipine, and therefore cause oral administration to be prone to larger inter- and intra-subject variability.

Reworded

The bioavailability of nimodipine oral nimodipine capsules observed was only approximately 7% compared to 100% for GTx-104. Consequently, about one-twelfth the amount of nimodipine is delivered with GTx-104 to achieve comparable PKs as with thenimodipine oral capsules. ThisThese data isare presented in the chart below.

Added

In June 2025, we submitted to the FDA an NDA for GTx-104 for the treatment of aSAH, which was accepted for review by the FDA in August 2025 with an April 23, 2026, Prescription Drug User Fee Act (“PDUFA”) target date for completing FDA’s review of our submission. The NDA included clinical results from our STRIVE-ON trial for GTx-104.

Added

As previously noted, in April 2026, the FDA issued a CRL in response to our NDA submission for GTx-104. The CRL referenced certain items in the CMC and non-clinical sections of the application, which we believe can be addressed in a resubmission of the NDA. The items cited by the FDA include the cGMP compliance status of our contract manufacturer. This is a facility-level matter, and not a GTx-104 product-specific quality finding. The CRL also cited additional leachables data time points and excipient toxicology risk assessments. The CRL did not identify any clinical safety or efficacy deficiencies and did not request additional clinical data. We intend to address each of the CRL items in our planned resubmission, including completing the required non-clinical studies.

Added

Following a Type A meeting with the FDA regarding the CRL, we received the FDA’s official meeting minutes constituting the official record of the meeting. The plan described below reflect our planned approach to addressing the items cited in the CRL following the Type A meeting and our review of the official minutes.

Added

We have initiated a dual-source manufacturing strategy for GTx-104 to mitigate potential remediation issues from our current contract manufacturer and provide flexibility, while continuing to address the remaining CMC and nonclinical items identified in the CRL. As such, a technology transfer to a second, U.S.-based contract manufacturer is already underway. The timing of NDA resubmission will reflect the manufacturing pathway that reaches readiness first: either (i) the U.S.-based facility, which would require completion of a full CMC package supported by 12 months of stability data following the technology transfer; or (ii) our current contract manufacturer, if it successfully remediates its FDA compliance issues and is able to support the NDA sooner.

Added

We intend to resubmit our NDA for GTx-104 for the treatment of aSAH once we have fully addressed the items cited in the CRL, and plan to report progress as key milestones are achieved. The timing of any FDA reinspection of the current contract manufacturer is determined by the FDA and is outside our control.

Added

GTx-102 is a novel, concentrated oral-mucosal spray of betamethasone intended to improve neurological symptoms of A-T, a rare genetic progressive autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder that affects children, for which there are currently no FDA-approved therapies. GTx-102 is a stable, concentrated oral spray formulation comprised of the gluco-corticosteroid betamethasone that, together with other excipients, can be sprayed conveniently over the tongue of the A-T patient and is rapidly absorbed.

Added

We have licensed the data from the multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial from Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy, where Dr. Zannolli et. al. studied the effect of oral liquid solution of betamethasone to reduce ataxia symptoms in patients with A-T. This oral liquid solution is not marketed in the United States and therefore is not available for clinical use. Currently, betamethasone is only available in the United States as an injectable or as a topical cream. This license gives us the right to reference the trial’s data in our NDA filing. On November 12, 2015, we submitted the data from the Zannolli trial to the FDA’s Division of Neurology at a pre-Investigational New Drug (“IND”) meeting and received guidance from the agency on the regulatory requirements to seek approval.

Added

GTx-102 update

Added

As previously disclosed, in May 2023 we made a strategic decision to defer clinical development of GTx-102 to prioritize resources toward GTx-104 and its advancement toward an NDA filing.

Added

In June 2026, following continued evaluation of strategic priorities and focus on GTx-104, we determined we will not resume internal development funding for GTx-102 under our current operating plan. Accordingly, we determined that the remaining carrying value of the GTx-102 IPR&D asset is no longer recoverable on an internal-development basis.

Added

As of March 31, 2026, the remaining capitalized carrying value of GTx-102 IPR&D was $9.2 million. We recognized an impairment charge for the full remaining capitalized carrying value in the first quarter of fiscal year 2027.

Added

Consistent with our stated position since 2023, we retain all intellectual property and patent rights associated with GTx-102 and continue to evaluate business development opportunities, including out-licensing, partnerships, or non-dilutive arrangements, that would enable advancement of the program without requiring our direct capital investment. GTx-102 may provide value through such a transaction. There can be no assurance that any such transaction will be completed on favorable terms or at all.

Added

GTx-101 is a non-narcotic, topical bio-adhesive film-forming bupivacaine spray designed to ease the symptoms of patients suffering with Postherapetic Neuralgia (PHN), which is neuropathic pain due to damage caused by the varicella zoster virus. GTx-101 is administered via a metered-dose of bupivacaine spray and forms a thin bio-adhesive topical film on the surface of the patient’s skin, which enables a touch-free, non-greasy application. It also comes in convenient, portable 30 ml plastic bottles. Unlike oral gabapentin and lidocaine patches which are used for the treatment of PHN, we believe that the biphasic delivery mechanism of GTx-101 has the potential for rapid onset of action and continuous pain relief for up to eight hours. No skin sensitivity was reported in a Phase 1 trial.

Added

GTx-101 update

Added

As previously disclosed, in May 2023 we made a strategic decision to defer clinical development of GTx-101 to prioritize resources toward GTx-104 and our advancement toward an NDA filing.

Added

In June 2026, following continued evaluation of strategic priorities and focus on GTx-104, we determined we will not resume internal development funding for GTx-101 under our current operating plan. Accordingly, we determined that the remaining carrying value of the GTx-101 IPR&D asset is no longer recoverable on an internal-development basis.

Added

As of March 31, 2026, the remaining capitalized carrying value of GTx-101 IPR&D was $4.3 million. We recognized an impairment charge for the full remaining capitalized carrying value in the first quarter of fiscal year 2027.

Added

Consistent with our stated position since 2023, we retain all intellectual property and patent rights associated with GTx-101 and continue to evaluate business development opportunities, including out-licensing, partnerships, or non-dilutive arrangements, that would enable advancement of the program without requiring our direct capital investment. GTx-101 may provide value through such a transaction. There can be no assurance that any such transaction will be completed on favorable terms or at all.

Removed

Feedback from the FDA informed our data and regulatory packages, and we submitted the NDA for GTx-104 on June 25, 2025. The FDA accepted our NDA for review on August 22, 2025, and established April 23, 2026 as its PDUFA target date.

Reworded

We have worldwide commercialization rights for all our pipeline drug candidates and plan to maximize the value of each of our drug candidates over time. Currently, we have prioritized the development of GTx-104 over that of GTx-102 and GTx-101. If we receive regulatory approval for GTx-104 in the U.S., we plan to commercialize GTx-104 with a highly experienced and targeted hospital-based sales force. We may seek commercial partnerships to fully exploit the market potential of GTx-104 in the U.S. and in territories outside the U.S. It is possible that we out-license or sell GTx-102 and/or GTx-101 for the U.S. and/or global markets.

Showing the first 60 of 138 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

GRCE insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 7 Form 4 filings (2 insiders, 9 trade dates, 225,354 shares, about $473.8K) and open-market sales in 0 filings. Net open-market shares: 225,354 (purchases minus sales); net value about $473.8K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2026-10-05Opaleye Management Inc.
10% owner
Open-market purchase 1,694$2.06 $3.5K2,858,657 SEC
2026-10-02Opaleye Management Inc.
10% owner
Open-market purchase 20,000$2.07 $41.4K2,856,963 SEC
2026-10-01Opaleye Management Inc.
10% owner
Open-market purchase 38,796$2.04 $79.0K2,836,963 SEC
2026-09-29Opaleye Management Inc.
10% owner
Open-market purchase 7,849$2.09 $16.4K2,798,167 SEC
2026-09-23Opaleye Management Inc.
10% owner
Open-market purchase 5,318$2.10 $11.2K2,790,318 SEC
2026-09-23Opaleye Management Inc.
10% owner
Open-market purchase 5,318$2.10 $11.2K2,855,318 SEC
2026-09-21Opaleye Management Inc.
10% owner
Open-market purchase 9,771$2.10 $20.5K2,785,000 SEC
2026-09-21Opaleye Management Inc.
10% owner
Open-market purchase 9,771$2.10 $20.5K2,850,000 SEC
2026-09-09Opaleye Management Inc.
10% owner
Open-market purchase 5,836$2.09 $12.2K2,775,229 SEC
2026-09-09Kohli Prashant
Director, Chief Executive Officer
Open-market purchase 100,000$2.14 $214.0K121,357 SEC
2026-09-08Opaleye Management Inc.
10% owner
Open-market purchase 9,393$2.10 $19.7K2,769,393 SEC
2026-08-14Opaleye Management Inc.
10% owner
Open-market purchase 11,608$2.09 $24.3K2,760,000 SEC

Well-known investors holding GRCE (13F)

InvestorQuarterSharesReported value% of their 13FChange vs prior quarter
Renaissance Technologies COM2026-06-30243,910$1.1M—Sold out
Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) COM2026-06-30349,740$793.9K0.0%Added 254%
Two Sigma Investments COM2026-06-3096,890$219.9K0.0%New position

13F reports are filed up to 45 days after quarter end and show long U.S. equity positions only; options positions are omitted here.

Coming soon: email alerts when GRCE files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.