GYRO 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Gyrodyne, LLC · Nasdaq · Opeators Of Nonresidential Buildings · CIK 1589061 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “We may be unable to renew expiring leases or re-lease vacant space on a timely basis or on attractive terms, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flow.”
New heading “Our investments are concentrated in a single industry, making us more vulnerable economically than if our investments were more diversified.”
New heading “We have entered into an agreement to sell a significant portion of our Flowerfield property, but the transaction is contingent on receiving subdivision and site plan approval, which may take years or may not be obtained at all. In the meantime, we expect to continue to incur operating losses and have limited cash runway.”
Largest changes
“We have entered into an agreement to sell a significant portion of our Flowerfield property, but the transaction is contingent on receiving subdivision and site plan approval, which may take years or may not be obtained at all. In the meantime, we expect to continue to incur operating losses and have limited cash runway.”see in full comparison
“We may be unable to renew expiring leases or re-lease vacant space on a timely basis or on attractive terms, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flow.”see in full comparison
“Our investments are concentrated in a single industry, making us more vulnerable economically than if our investments were more diversified.”see in full comparison
The 2023 Mortgage Loan is secured by a first mortgage in the amount of $1,500,000 on the interests of GSD Cortlandt in 1989 Crompond Road and 1987 Crompond Road in Cortlandt Manor, New York, and the interests of Buttonwood in 206 Buttonwood Avenue and certain vacant land off of Buttonwood Road in Cortlandt Manor, New York. The Company closed on a loan modification with the LLYR to extend the loan for an additional 24 months commencing January 1, 2026 at a revised interest rate of 15% which the Company may refinance with no early repayment penalty.see in full comparison
Challenging a government decision in an Article 78 proceeding can lead to delay in enforcement of the government action, whether or not the suit is successful, and the government sometimes agrees to delay implementation until legal challenges are resolved. Moreover, there can be no assurances that there will not be any additional efforts to challenge decisions made by the Town of Smithtown or any other governmental agency decision impacting our properties or our efforts to enhance the value of our properties through the commencement of other Article 78 proceedings or other forms of litigation. Although Article 78 proceedings take place on an expedited timeline and generally without discovery, we cannot provide any assurances as to the anticipated resolution of the Article 78see in full comparisonProceeding could take an additional six monthsProceeding, ormoreanyforfutureaArticledecision78 proceedings relating to our properties that may be commenced in the future, given the impact the pandemic has had on the courtsystem with additional time needed for an appeal, if one is filed.system. Consequently,the commencement ofthe Article 78 Proceeding and any future such proceedings could result inafurtherextensionextensions of the Company’s timeline for completing the process of securing entitlements, selling our properties and distributing netproceeds. Nevertheless, the Company remains confident that the process of negotiating purchase agreements, securing final subdivision approval and final unappealable site plan approval and consummating the sale of our properties will culminate by year-end 2026, although the Company believes that standard market contract terms would include resolution to the Article 78 proceeding as condition to closingproceeds and there can be no assurance that the Company and the Town of Smithtown will be successful in the defense of the Planning Board’s determinations against thePetition or that other factors beyond our control (i.e., potential contract contingencies including site plan approval (excluding the existing industrial buildings situated on two separate lots which can be sold together or separately upon the resolution of the Article 78 Proceeding and the conclusion of the subdivision, without any site plan approvals)) will necessitate an extension of the timeline.Petition.
“On October 16, 2025, the Company entered into a letter agreement (the “Star Agreement”) with Star Equity, pursuant to which Star Equity agreed to irrevocably withdraw its June 4, 2025 notice of intent to nominate two directors at the 2025 annual meeting. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (29)
On March 17, 2025, the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Suffolk County issued an order denying the appellants motion to stay enforcement of the order, pending hearing and determination of appeal. On March 21, 2025, the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Suffolk County issued an order denying the Petitioners motion to renew and reargue. On April 16, 2025 the Petitioners filed a notice of appeal seeking to appeal the March 17, 2025 order denying the appellants motion to stay enforcement of the order dismissing the Petition pending the appeal.
On April 28, 2025 the Petitioners perfected their appeal on the original Petition. The Petitioners’ memorandum of law largely repeats their earlier position and arguments, which the Supreme Court previously found to be an insufficient basis for overturning the Planning Board’s determinations. Gyrodyne filed its response to the Appeal on July 25, 2025 and the Town submitted its reply to the Appeal on July 28, 2025.
Challenging a government decision in an Article 78 proceeding can lead to delay in enforcement of the government action, whether or not the suit is successful, and the government sometimes agrees to delay implementation until legal challenges are resolved. Moreover, there can be no assurances that there will not be any additional efforts to challenge decisions made by the Town of Smithtown or any other governmental agency decision impacting our properties or our efforts to enhance the value of our properties through the commencement of other Article 78 proceedings or other forms of litigation. Although Article 78 proceedings take place on an expedited timeline and generally without discovery, we cannot provide any assurances as to the anticipated resolution of the Article 78 Proceeding could take an additional six monthsProceeding, or moreany forfuture aArticle decision78 proceedings relating to our properties that may be commenced in the future, given the impact the pandemic has had on the court system with additional time needed for an appeal, if one is filed.system. Consequently, the commencement of the Article 78 Proceeding and any future such proceedings could result in a further extensionextensions of the Company’s timeline for completing the process of securing entitlements, selling our properties and distributing net proceeds. Nevertheless, the Company remains confident that the process of negotiating purchase agreements, securing final subdivision approval and final unappealable site plan approval and consummating the sale of our properties will culminate by year-end 2026, although the Company believes that standard market contract terms would include resolution to the Article 78 proceeding as condition to closingproceeds and there can be no assurance that the Company and the Town of Smithtown will be successful in the defense of the Planning Board’s determinations against the Petition or that other factors beyond our control (i.e., potential contract contingencies including site plan approval (excluding the existing industrial buildings situated on two separate lots which can be sold together or separately upon the resolution of the Article 78 Proceeding and the conclusion of the subdivision, without any site plan approvals)) will necessitate an extension of the timeline.Petition.
Distributions to shareholders may be delayed or reduced as a result of sale agreement provisionsprovisions, including under our agreement with B2K, that allow purchasers to terminate agreements, that result in purchaser defaults or that make the purchase price contingent upon site plan approval.
Purchase and sale agreements thatfor wethe havesale enteredof into with respect toour properties wemay previouslycontain soldstandard containedmarket provisions that gavegive the purchaser the right to terminate the agreement, for any reason or no reason, prior to the expiration of an evaluation period, and receive a refund of earnest money deposits, and it can be anticipated that agreements for future property sales will have similar provisions.deposits. The consummation of property sales forunder whichsuch weagreements, willincluding enterour intopurchase and sale agreementsagreement inwith B2K (the future“B2K willAgreement”), are also be subject to satisfaction of standard closing conditions. Moreover,The weclosing anticipateunder thatthe B2K Agreement is, and closings under future purchase and sale agreements mayare alsoexpected beto be, contingent upon the purchaser obtaining (at its expense) final site plan approval for a designated number of units within a specified period of time, with the purchaser having a right to terminate the agreement or extend the approval period if it fails to secure such approval within such time period, and with the purchase price for the property being a function of agreed upon price per unit and the number of approved units. If any property sale contemplated by the B2K Agreement or future sale agreements does not close because a purchaser exercises its termination right or defaults, or because of a failure of a closing condition or for any other reason, we will need to locate a new buyer for the property, which we may be unable to do promptly or at a price or on terms that are as favorable as contained in the original sale agreement. Many of the costs incurred due to a sale that fails to close are sunk costs with no future value and we will also incur additional costs involved in negotiating a new sale agreement for such property. These additional costs are not included in our projections. In the event that we incur these additional costs or if the number of approved units under final site plan approval turns out to be below what we anticipate, distributions to our shareholders would be delayed or reduced.
The liquidation basis of accounting requires us to accrue all costs associated with implementing and completing our plan of liquidation. Total liability for estimated costs in excess of estimated receipts during liquidation, inclusive of the costs listed above plus costs associated with the sale of real estate, payments made under the retention bonus plan, litigation costs and liquidating costs, total $11,089,746.$17,334,618 inclusive of a closing credit to B2K for certain infrastructure costs of approximately $4 million. The total amount of land entitlement costs, transaction fees and all operating and administrative costs in the liquidation is not yet known and, therefore, we have used estimates of these costs in calculating the amounts of our projected distributions to our shareholders. To the extent that we have underestimated these costs in calculating our projections or we incur unforeseen additional costs, our actual distributions may be lower than our estimated net assets. In addition, if the claims of our creditors are greater than we have anticipated, or we decide to acquire one or more insurance policies covering unknown or contingent claims against us, our distributions may be delayed or reduced. Further, if a reserve fund is established, payment of distributions to our holders of common shares may be delayed or reduced.
In 2023, theThe Company wasreceived targeteda bynotice andated activistJune campaign4, pursuant2025 to whichfrom Star Equity Fund, LP (“Star Equity”), notifiedwhich claimed to own approximately 7.1% of our outstanding shares at the Companytime (theof “Nominationsubmission, Notice”)purporting to give notice of its intent to nominate a slate of two candidates for election as directors at the 20232025 annual meeting of shareholders (the “2023 Annual Meeting”), and then submitted a shareholder proposal to the Company pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Shareholder Proposal”).shareholders.
On October 16, 2025, the Company entered into a letter agreement (the “Star Agreement”) with Star Equity, pursuant to which Star Equity agreed to irrevocably withdraw its June 4, 2025 notice of intent to nominate two directors at the 2025 annual meeting. The Star Agreement also obligates Star Equity to vote all Gyrodyne shares it owns in accordance with the Board’s recommendations including on the election of directors prior to the Termination Date (as defined below), except that Star Equity will be permitted to vote (i) in its discretion on any proposal regarding certain extraordinary transactions, and (ii) in accordance with the recommendation of Institutional Shareholder Services to the extent the recommendation differs from the Board’s recommendation on any matter presented to the shareholders at a special meeting of shareholders following the 2025 annual meeting. Star Equity’s obligations continue until December 31, 2026, or December 31, 2027 if the Board re-nominates both Nader G.M. Salour and Jan H. Loeb for election at the Company’s 2026 annual meeting and both Messrs. Salour and Loeb agree to such re-nomination (the “Termination Date”).
The Star Agreement also prevents Star Equity until the Termination Date from, among other things, (i) nominating any person for election or submitting any shareholder proposal for consideration at any meeting of shareholders of the Company at which directors are to be elected, (ii) soliciting proxies or (iii) taking actions to change or influence the Board, management or the direction of certain Company matters. Until the Termination Date, the Company and Star Equity have also agreed not to disparage each other.
Under the Star Agreement, the Company agreed to nominate only one Board member at the 2025 annual meeting, Richard Smith, for election for an additional three-year term and to reduce the size of the board from five to four seats. If any of Jan H. Loeb, Nader G.M. Salour, Richard B. Smith or Ronald J. Macklin (each, a “Continuing Director”) resigns or ceases to be a director due to death or disability, then the Board and Star Equity will engage in good faith discussions to identify a mutually acceptable independent (as defined under Nasdaq listing rules) replacement director (the “Replacement Director”), and if they cannot agree the size of the Board will be reduced to three directors. In such event, if a remaining Continuing Director subsequently resigns or ceases to be a director due to death or disability, then the Board may not make an additional appointment until the Board and Star Equity identify a mutually acceptable Replacement Director.
The Company also agreed not to increase Board fees and to limit the aggregate fee paid to the Chairman of the Board to $65,000.
Star Equity also purported to deliver a notice of intent to nominate a slate of two candidates in 2023 (the “2023 Nomination Notice”), and then submitted a shareholder proposal to the Company pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Shareholder Proposal”). The Company later entered into a letter agreement with Star Equity, pursuant to which Star Equity agreed to irrevocably withdraw both the 2023 Nomination Notice and the Shareholder Proposal.
On September 5, 2023, the Company entered into a letter agreement (“Cooperation Agreement”) with Star Equity, pursuant to which Star Equity agreed to irrevocably withdraw both the Nomination Notice and the Shareholder Proposal. Through December 31, 2024,2025, the cumulative cost to the Company of responding to and resolving the foregoing shareholder activist campaign,campaigns, including changes to our incentive compensation arrangements, was approximately $950,000.$1,050,000.
The Company intends to seek to modify one or more of its existing loan facilities to strengthen its financial position through the end of 2028, the forecasted completion of the liquidation process. The Company’s goal with respect to any such modification is for its current cash and cash equivalent position post-loan modification to be adequate to fund our process of seeking entitlements and selling assets through such forecasted liquidation completion date. Management believes the Company will need additional capital to properly fund operations through the end of 2028 absent sufficient working capital raised through the combination of property sales or the modification of its existing credit facilities and or new credit facilities, or other alternative capital raising strategies. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be successful in securing any such loan modification/ and/or new credit facilities on terms that are satisfactory to the Company or on any terms at all or achieve a timely closing on the sale of a property to address its working capital needs. If such available cash and amounts received on the sale of assets are not adequate to provide for our obligations, liabilities, expenses and claims, distributions of cash and other assets to our shareholders would be eliminated. In the event our shareholders receive distributions from Gyrodyne and there are insufficient funds to pay any creditors who seek payment of claims against Gyrodyne, shareholders could be held liable for payments made to them and could be required to return all or a part of the distributions made to them.
The Company believes we are currently capitalized with adequate cash levels (after the Rights Offering which closed on March 7, 2024), including proceeds from our credit facilities, to operate our business and complete our strategic plan of positioning our remaining properties for sale at enhanced values and making distributions to our shareholders.
Although we assess our banking relationships as we believe necessary or appropriate, our access to funding sources and other credit arrangements in amounts adequate to finance or capitalize our business operations and strategic plans to position our properties and sell them for maximum value could be significantly impaired by factors that affect us, the financial institutions with which we have arrangements directly, or the financial services industry or economy in general. These factors could include, among others, events such as liquidity constraints or failures, the ability to perform obligations under various types of financial, credit or liquidity agreements or arrangements, disruptions or instability in the financial services industry or financial markets, or concerns or negative expectations about the prospects for companies in the financial services industry. These factors could involve financial institutions or financial services industry companies with which we have financial or business relationships,relationships but could also include factors involving financial markets or the financial services industry generally.
We may be unable to renew expiring leases or re-lease vacant space on a timely basis or on attractive terms, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flow.
The Company has approximately 52% of its annual leasing revenue up for renewal in 2026. Current tenants may not renew their leases upon the expiration of their terms and may attempt to terminate their leases prior to the expiration of their current terms. This risk has been increased by tenants working from home during and after the recent pandemic which has resulted in certain tenants re-evaluating the size and/or lay-out of their existing leased premises. If non-renewals or terminations occur, we may not be able to locate qualified replacement tenants and, as a result, we could lose a significant source of revenue while remaining responsible for the payment of our financial obligations. Moreover, the terms of a renewal or new lease, including the amount of rent, may be less favorable to us than the current lease terms, or we may be forced to provide tenant improvements at our expense or provide other concessions or additional services to maintain or attract tenants. Any of these factors could cause a decline in lease revenue or an increase in operating expenses, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Our investments are concentrated in a single industry, making us more vulnerable economically than if our investments were more diversified.
We are subject to risks inherent in concentrating investments in real estate. The risks resulting from a lack of diversification become even greater as a result of our historical business strategy to invest primarily in healthcare properties. A downturn in the real estate industry could materially adversely affect the value of our facilities. A downturn in the healthcare industry could negatively affect our tenants’ ability to make lease payments to us. Consequently, our ability to meet debt service obligations or make distributions to our shareholders is dependent on the real estate and healthcare industries.
On March 12, 2023, Signature Bank was closed by the New York State Department of Financial Services, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) as receiver. To protect depositors, the FDIC transferred all the deposits and substantially all of the assets of Signature Bank to Signature Bridge Bank, N.A., a full-service bank that will be operated by the FDIC as it markets the institution to potential bidders. On March 12, 2023, the Company had approximately $61,000 on deposit and approximately $97,000 in a real estate tax escrow account (escrow balance will not exceed approximately $109,000) at Signature Bank. Based upon the announcement on March 12, 2023, from the U.S. Department of the Treasury, the U.S. Federal Reserve and the FDIC that all depositors of Signature Bank would have access to all of their deposits and the fact that the amount on deposit is below the $250,000 cap on FDIC deposit insurance, the Company expects to have access to all of its cash on deposit at Signature Bank. On December 14, 2023, the FDIC transferred the 2021 Mortgage Loan to SIG CRE 2023 Venture LLC, which continues to be the holder of the Mortgage Loan. There are no undrawn amounts under the 2021 Mortgage Loan.
On December 27, 2023, the Company, through its subsidiaries GSD Cortlandt, LLC (“GSD Cortlandt”) and Buttonwood Acquisition, LLC (“Buttonwood”), secured a term mortgage loan (the “2023 Mortgage Loan”) in the principal amount of $1,500,000 with LLYR Resources, LLC.LLC (“LLYR”). The net proceeds of the 2023 Mortgage Loan will be used for general working capital. The 2023 Mortgage Loan is unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed by the Company. The term of the 2023 Mortgage Loan is two years. Until the maturity date, the 2023 Mortgage Loan bears interest at a floating interest rate of 1.5% per annum in excess of the Wall Street Prime Rate, with such interest payable monthly, which may be prepaid, in whole or in part, at any time, without payment of a prepayment fee.
The 2023 Mortgage Loan is secured by a first mortgage in the amount of $1,500,000 on the interests of GSD Cortlandt in 1989 Crompond Road and 1987 Crompond Road in Cortlandt Manor, New York, and the interests of Buttonwood in 206 Buttonwood Avenue and certain vacant land off of Buttonwood Road in Cortlandt Manor, New York. The Company closed on a loan modification with the LLYR to extend the loan for an additional 24 months commencing January 1, 2026 at a revised interest rate of 15% which the Company may refinance with no early repayment penalty.
On February 1, 2024, an agreement was signed with one vendor who had previously agreed to defer 50% of payment until the closing of the first property lot sale that is the subject of either the Flowerfield or Cortlandt Manor subdivision. The agreement called for a $200,000 payment on outstanding invoices, plus an interest payment on such invoices, interest to be accrued on the outstanding balance, agreement to pay all future invoices in full, and conversion of the remaining outstanding balance of $477,829 (balance after the $200,000 payment) to a loan payable within 15 days of the sale of one of the Company’s properties. The loan accrued interest at 0.75% per month through 2024 and willis accrueaccruing interest at 1.0% per month startingfrom January 2025.
The Company intends to seek to modify any of its existing loan facilities to strengthen its financial position through the end of 2026, the forecasted completion of the liquidation process. The Company’s goal with respect to any such modification is for its current cash and cash equivalent position post-loan modification to be adequate to fund our process of seeking entitlements and selling assets through the end of 2026, the forecasted date for the completion of the liquidation and subsequent dissolution. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be successful in securing any such loan modification on terms that are satisfactory to the Company or on any terms at all.
We have entered into an agreement to sell a significant portion of our Flowerfield property, but the transaction is contingent on receiving subdivision and site plan approval, which may take years or may not be obtained at all. In the meantime, we expect to continue to incur operating losses and have limited cash runway.
As part of our strategic plan to position our remaining real estate assets to maximize value, sell those assets at their highest achievable prices, distribute the net proceeds to shareholders and ultimately dissolve the Company, we have entered into an agreement to sell approximately 49 undeveloped acres of our Flowerfield property to B2K Smithtown LLC (“B2K”), an affiliate of B2K Development LLC. The closing of the sale is contingent upon receipt of all required governmental approvals, including final subdivision and site plan approvals. The process for securing these approvals is subject to a variety of risks outside our control, and may take years, if achieved at all.
In the interim, we expect to continue incurring operating losses. We currently have available cash resources sufficient to fund operations for approximately 18 months absent the sale of any other real estate assets which we are currently pursuing. The Company will entertain a wide range of options to meet its capital needs through the completion of the liquidation. These risks could materially and adversely affect the value of our shares and the timing and amount of any potential liquidation distribution.
The Company intends to seek to modify one or more of its existing loan facilities to strengthen its financial position through the end of 2028, the forecasted completion of the liquidation process. The Company’s goal with respect to any such modification is for its current cash and cash equivalent position post-loan modification to be adequate to fund our process of seeking entitlements and selling assets through such forecasted liquidation completion date. Management believes the Company will need additional capital to properly fund operations through the end of 2028 absent sufficient working capital raised through the combination of property sales or the modification of its existing credit facilities and or new credit facilities, or other alternative capital raising strategies. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be successful in securing any such loan modification/ and/or new credit facilities on terms that are satisfactory to the Company or on any terms at all or achieve a timely closing on the sale of a property to address its working capital needs.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
Largest changes
“Net assets as of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 would result in estimated liquidating distributions of $25,858,997 and $30,596,313, respectively, or approximately $11.76 and $13.91 per common share, respectively, based on 2,199,308 shares outstanding. …”see in full comparison
“On December 27, 2023, the Company, through its subsidiaries GSD Cortlandt, LLC (“GSD Cortlandt”) and Buttonwood Acquisition, LLC (“Buttonwood”), secured a term mortgage loan (the “2023 Mortgage Loan”) in the principal amount of $1,500,000 with LLYR Resources, LLC. The net proceeds of the 2023 Mortgage Loan will be used for general working capital. The 2023 Mortgage Loan is unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed by the Company. The term of the 2023 Mortgage Loan is two years. …”see in full comparison
“The following discussion is intended to provide shareholders with certain information regarding the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s business and management’s efforts to respond to those impacts. …”see in full comparison
We are affected by the fiscal and monetary policies of the United States Government and its agencies, including the policies of the Federal Reserve, which regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States. The combination of elevated interest rates and persistent inflation (or the perception that any of these events may continue) have contributed to continued weakness in commercial real estate markets, including in those real estate markets in which we operate. Changes in fiscal and monetary policies are beyond our control and are difficult to predict. Although the Federal Reserve decreased the federal funds rate multiple times insee in full comparison2024,2024 and three times in 2025, the rate continues to be elevated and there can be no assurance that the rate will continue to decrease or that it will not be increased in20252026 and beyond.While lower market rates and increased capital markets liquidity supports commercial real estate property transactions and values, regulatedRegulated lending institutions are adjusting their business models to increase capital requirements for direct loans to real estate and thus continue to be constrained in providing capital for commercial real estate properties. Changes in the federal funds rate as well as the other policies of the Federal Reserve affect interest rates, which have a significant impact on our financial condition.
“Net assets as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 would result in estimated liquidating distributions of $30,596,313 and $30,721,034, or approximately $13.91 and $19.51 per common share, respectively, based on 2,199,308 and 1,574,308 shares outstanding, respectively. …”see in full comparison
The Company intends to seek to modifysee in full comparisonanyone or more of its existing loan facilities to strengthen its financial position through the end of2026,2028, the forecasted completion of the liquidation process. The Company’s goal with respect to any such modification is for its current cash and cash equivalent position post-loan modification to be adequate to fund our process of seeking entitlements and selling assets through such forecasted liquidation completion date. Management believes the Company will need additional capital to properly fund operations through the end of2026,2028 absent sufficient working capital raised through theforecastedcombinationdateofforproperty sales or thecompletionmodification oftheitsliquidationexisting credit facilities andsubsequentordissolution.new credit facilities, or other alternative capital raising strategies. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be successful in securing any such loan modification/ and/or new credit facilities on terms that are satisfactory to the Company or on any terms atall.all or achieve a timely closing on the sale of a property to address its working capital needs. If such available cash and amounts received on the sale of assets are not adequate to provide for our obligations, liabilities, expenses and claims, distributions of cash and other assets to our shareholders would be eliminated. In the event our shareholders receive distributions from Gyrodyne and there are insufficient funds to pay any creditors who seek payment of claims against Gyrodyne, shareholders could be held liable for payments made to them and could be required to return all or a part of the distributions made to them.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (22)
The statements made in this Form 10-K and in other materials the Company has filed or may file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in each case that are not historical facts, contain “forward-looking information” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, both as amended, which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “projects,” “estimates,” “believes,” “seeks,” “could,” “should,” or “continue,” the negative thereof, and other variations or comparable terminology as well as statements regarding the evaluation of liquidation contingencies. These forward-looking statements are based on the current plans and expectations of management and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, risks and uncertainties generally relating to our efforts to enhance the values of our remaining properties and seek the orderly, strategic sale of such properties as soon as reasonably practicable, risks associated with the Article 78 Proceeding against the Company and any other litigation that may develop in connection with our efforts to enhance the value of and sell our properties, risks relating to our national marketing campaign led by JLL for the sale of our Flowerfield property,and Cortlandt Manor properties, risks associated with our purchase and sale agreement with B2K (and future purchase and sale agreements for our remaining properties that may be contingent on years-long regulatory contingencies) in light of our financial condition, community activism risk, proxy contests and other actions of activist shareholders, regulatory enforcement risk, risks inherent in the real estate markets of Suffolk and Westchester Counties in New York, the potential residual effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, lingering risks relating to the 2023 banking crisis and closure of two major banks (including one with whom we indirectly had a mortgage loan which the FDIC transferred in December 2023 to a new holder following the banks closure), ongoing inflation risk, ongoing interest rate uncertainty, recession uncertainty and supply chain constraints or disruptions and other risks detailed from time to time in the Company’s SEC reports. These and other matters the Company discuss in this Report, or in the documents it incorporates by reference into this Report, may cause actual results to differ from those the Company describes. The Company assumes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Our operating focus is on maximizing cashflows and market value of our operating properties while we are securing entitlements with the objective of increasing development flexibility with respect to our remaining properties and maximizing distributions to our shareholders as soon as reasonably practicable. As of December 31, 2025, our properties were 82% leased to 31 tenants. As of December 31, 2024, our properties were 82% leased to 32 tenants. As of December 31, 2023, our properties were 86% leased to 35 tenants. The reduction in occupancy is mainly attributable to one tenant who occupied two suites in Cortlandt Manor that as of December 31, 2024 vacated according to an early termination agreement.
Under the liquidation basis of accounting, all the Company’s assets have been stated at their estimated net realizable value, or liquidation value, (which represents the estimated amount of cash that Gyrodyne will collect on the disposal of assets (prior to any credits for contribution amounts which are reflected in the costs in excess of receipts) as it carries out the plan of liquidation), which is based on independent third-party appraisals, estimates and other indications of sales value. All liabilities of the Company, including those estimated costs associated with implementing the plan of liquidation, have been stated at their estimated settlement amounts. These amounts are presented in the accompanying statements of net assets. These estimates are periodically reviewed and adjusted as appropriate. There can be no assurance that these estimated values will be realized. Such amounts should not be taken as an indication of the timing or amount of future distributions or our actual dissolution. The valuation of assets at their net realizable value and liabilities at their anticipated settlement amount represent estimates, based on present facts and circumstances, of the net realizable value of the assets and the costs associated with carrying out the plan of liquidation. The actual values and costs associated with carrying out the plan of liquidation may differ from amounts reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements because of the plan’s inherent uncertainty. These differences may be material. In particular, the estimates of our costs will vary with the length of time necessary to complete the plan of liquidation, which is currently anticipated to be completed by December 31, 2026.2028.
As reported in footnote two, the Company is on a liquidation basis of accounting. The detailed information regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), President and CEO, is reported in Notefootnote 4 in detail supporting the estimated liquidation and operating costs net of estimated receipts. This information allows the CODM to manage and forecast any impact the operations have on the estimated real estate value and in the aggregate allows the CODM to calculate estimated distributions. The net assets as of December 31, 20242025 ($30,596,313$25,858,997) and December 31, 20232024 ($30,721,034$30,596,313) results in estimated distributions of approximately $13.91$11.76 and $19.51$13.91 per common share, respectively, based on 2,199,308 and 1,574,308 shares outstanding, respectively.outstanding.
Net assets as of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 would result in estimated liquidating distributions of $25,858,997 and $30,596,313, respectively, or approximately $11.76 and $13.91 per common share, respectively, based on 2,199,308 shares outstanding. The decrease of $4,737,316 in estimated liquidating distributions is mainly attributable to an increase in estimated liquidation and operating costs net of estimated receipts for the two year timeline extension of approximately $3,500,000 (to allow sufficient time for the B2K Agreement (dated July 30th, 2025 inclusive of its latest amendment dated January 6, 2026) to close), the closing credit to B2K for certain sewer treatment plant and onsite infrastructure costs of approximately $4,000,000, increase in retention bonuses and selling costs due to the increased value of real estate of approximately $479,000, prepayment penalty and loan extension/new loan fees of approximately $140,000 and additional land development fees of $190,000 (excluding the adjustment attributable to the timeline extension) partially offset by the increase in real estate value of approximately $3,600,000.
Net assets as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 would result in estimated liquidating distributions of $30,596,313 and $30,721,034, or approximately $13.91 and $19.51 per common share, respectively, based on 2,199,308 and 1,574,308 shares outstanding, respectively. The decrease of $124,721 in estimated liquidating distributions is mainly attributable to the decrease in real estate value of $3,392,000 and the increased costs associated with the one year time line extension ($1,912,000) offset by the cash raised in the rights offering (net proceeds of $4,418,380) which closed on March 7, 2024, savings in costs associated with the decrease in real estate value of $336,283 and other savings (approximately $425,000 of which approximately $350,000 is a result of a negotiated reduction in legal fees from the shareholder activist campaign). Approximately $3.39 per share of the $5.60 decrease in net assets per share is attributable to the issuance in the Rights Offering of 625,000 shares at $8 per share (reflecting a discount of $8.12 per share to the proforma net assets in liquidation as of December 31, 2023).
The Company estimates the net realizable value of its real estate assets by using income and market valuation techniques. The Company may estimate net realizable values using market information such as broker opinions of value, appraisals, and recent sales data for similar assets or discounted cash flow models, which primarily rely on Level 3 inputs, as defined under FASB ASC Topic No. 820, Fair Value Measurement. The Company also considers in its valuation estimates the receipt of any credible expressions of interest/letters from perspective buyers adjusted to reflect the Company’s best estimate of any contingent financial terms inclusivesuch ofas approvalapproved density and related site plans. The cash flow models include estimated cash inflows and outflows over a specified holding period. These cash flows may include contractual rental revenues, projected future rental revenues and expenses and forecasted capital improvements and lease commissions based upon market conditions determined through discussion with local real estate professionals and relevant Company experience with its current and previously owned properties. Capitalization rates and discount rates utilized in these models are estimated by management based upon rates that management believes to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for the respective properties based upon an analysis of factors such as property and tenant quality, geographical location, local supply and demand observations.observations and no sewage treatment plant. To the extent the Company underestimates or overestimates forecasted cash outflows (capital improvements, lease commissionscommissions, operating costs and operatingcredit costs) or overestimates or underestimates forecasted cash inflows (rental revenue rates), or other unfavorable or favorable variances of the aforementioned assumptions, the estimated net realizable value of its real estate assets could be overstated or understated.
The Company estimates that it will incur approximately $1.24$1.326 million (included in the consolidated statement of net assets as part of the estimated liquidation and operating costs net of receipts) in land entitlement costs from January 20252026 through the end of the liquidation period, currently estimated to conclude on or about December 31, 2026,2028, in an effort to obtain entitlements, including special permits. The Company believes the commitment of these resources will enable the Company to position the properties for sale with all entitlements necessary to maximize the aggregate Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor property values and resulting distributions. During the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, the Company incurred approximately $422,000$380,000 of land entitlement costs, consisting predominately of engineering fees, legal fees and real estate taxes. The Company believes the remaining balance of $1.24$1.326 million (inclusive of real estate taxes of $297,000$448,500 and regulatory fees of $409,000$408,000) will be incurred from January 20252026 through the end of the liquidation period. The Company does not intend to develop the properties but rather positioning the properties for increased development flexibility in the shortest period of time with the least amount of risk to the Company. The costs and time frame to achieve the entitlements could change due to a range of factors including a shift in the value of certain entitlements making it more profitable to pursue a different mix of entitlements and the dynamics of the real estate market. As a result, the Company has focused and will continue to focus its land entitlement efforts on achieving the highest and best use while considering the time and direct and indirect costs necessary to achieve such entitlements. During the process of pursuing such entitlements, the Company may entertain offers from potential buyers who may be willing to pay premiums for the properties that the Company finds more acceptable from a timing or value perspective than completing the entitlement processes itself. The value of the real estate reported in the statement of net assets as of December 31, 2024 includes some but not all of the potential value impact that may result from the land entitlement efforts. There can be no assurance that our value enhancement efforts will result in property value increases that exceed the costs we incur in such efforts, or even any increase at all.
(a) The remeasurement of assets and liabilities during 2025 includes approximately $4 million in a closing credit to B2K for certain infrastructure costs and approximately $3.5 million in costs relating to the timeline extension.
(a) The increase in net assets in liquidation during 2023 was the result of the change in the retention bonus plan, adoption of the restricted stock plan and an increase in real estate value offset by a one-year extension in the timeline and an increase in legal fees mainly attributable to shareholder activism.
We generally finance our operations through cash on hand. On March 7, 2024, the Company closed a rights offering resulting in approximately $4.4 million of net proceeds to the Company, thereby fortifying our cash position to ensureensuring we arecould operatingoperate throughfrom a position of strength through the duration of the liquidation estimated at the time of such offering to be the end of 2026 (but being extended to the end of 2028), to negotiate and enforce purchase agreements and defend our property rights in the Article 78 proceedingProceeding and in any other such proceeding that may arise. Furthermore, certain of the Company’s major vendors have informally agreed to defer payment on 50% of their fees until the first subdivided lot is sold. While these same vendors remain committed to deferring a large portion of their deferred fees (as disclosed in footnote 8), the extended timeline to the end of 2028 is resulting in economic pressure to provide for a yet to be determined partial payment, albeit expected to be less than half of the outstanding liability). Additionally, on December 6, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the Gyrodyne, LLC Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan for Employees and Directors (the “DCP”) effective as of January 1, 2020. The plan is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan maintained for officers and directors of the Company. Under the DCP, officers and directors may elect to defer a portion of their compensation to the DCP and receive interest on such deferred payments at a fixed rate of 5% (per annum). All DCP benefits will be paid in a single lump sum cash payment on December 15, 2031, as amended, unless a Plan of Liquidation is established for Gyrodyne before the distribution date in which case all benefits will be paid in a single lump sum cash payment after execution of an amendment to terminate the DCP (See Deferred Compensation Plan abovebelow).
On December 27, 2023, the Company, through its subsidiaries GSD Cortlandt, LLC (“GSD Cortlandt”) and Buttonwood Acquisition, LLC (“Buttonwood”), secured a term mortgage loan (the “2023 Mortgage Loan”) in the principal amount of $1,500,000 with LLYR Resources, LLC. The net proceeds of the 2023 Mortgage Loan will be used for general working capital. The 2023 Mortgage Loan is unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed by the Company. The term of the 2023 Mortgage Loan is two years. Until the maturity date, the 2023 Mortgage Loan bears interest at a floating interest rate of 1.5% per annum in excess of the Wall Street Prime Rate, with such interest payable monthly, which may be prepaid, in whole or in part, at any time, without payment of a prepayment fee.
The 2023 Mortgage Loan is secured by a first mortgage in the amount of $1,500,000 on the interests of GSD Cortlandt in 1989 Crompond Road and 1987 Crompond Road in Cortlandt Manor, New York, and the interests of Buttonwood in 206 Buttonwood Avenue and certain vacant land off of Buttonwood Road in Cortlandt Manor, New York.
The Company intends to seek to modify anyone or more of its existing loan facilities to strengthen its financial position through the end of 2026,2028, the forecasted completion of the liquidation process. The Company’s goal with respect to any such modification is for its current cash and cash equivalent position post-loan modification to be adequate to fund our process of seeking entitlements and selling assets through such forecasted liquidation completion date. Management believes the Company will need additional capital to properly fund operations through the end of 2026,2028 absent sufficient working capital raised through the forecastedcombination dateof forproperty sales or the completionmodification of theits liquidationexisting credit facilities and subsequentor dissolution.new credit facilities, or other alternative capital raising strategies. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be successful in securing any such loan modification/ and/or new credit facilities on terms that are satisfactory to the Company or on any terms at all.all or achieve a timely closing on the sale of a property to address its working capital needs. If such available cash and amounts received on the sale of assets are not adequate to provide for our obligations, liabilities, expenses and claims, distributions of cash and other assets to our shareholders would be eliminated. In the event our shareholders receive distributions from Gyrodyne and there are insufficient funds to pay any creditors who seek payment of claims against Gyrodyne, shareholders could be held liable for payments made to them and could be required to return all or a part of the distributions made to them.
Major elements of the Company’s cashflows for the year ended December 31, 2025 were as follows:
Major elements of the Company’s cashflows for the year ended December 31, 2023 were as follows:
Impact ofLingering Pandemic Effects and Macroeconomics:
The following discussion is intended to provide shareholders with certain information regarding the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s business and management’s efforts to respond to those impacts. Unless otherwise specified, the statistical and other information regarding the Company’s properties and tenants are estimates based on information currently available to the Company, may change, potentially significantly, going forward, and may not be indicative of the actual residual impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s business, operations, cash flows and financial condition for the year ended December 31, 2024 and future periods.
The COVID-19 pandemic has also adversely impacted, and may continue to impact adversely, the timeliness of local government in granting required approvals, as state and local staff charged with processing our subdivision applications all postponed activity due to work-from-home transitions. Accordingly, COVID-19 has caused, and may continue to cause, the completion of important stages in our efforts to secure entitlements to be delayed. The pandemic has also resulted in a significant shift toward commercial acceptance of remote working and telemedicine which may adversely impact our occupancy rate and average rate per square foot, although medical office has faced less of a challenge from work-from-home shifts.
We are affected by the fiscal and monetary policies of the United States Government and its agencies, including the policies of the Federal Reserve, which regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States. The combination of elevated interest rates and persistent inflation (or the perception that any of these events may continue) have contributed to continued weakness in commercial real estate markets, including in those real estate markets in which we operate. Changes in fiscal and monetary policies are beyond our control and are difficult to predict. Although the Federal Reserve decreased the federal funds rate multiple times in 2024,2024 and three times in 2025, the rate continues to be elevated and there can be no assurance that the rate will continue to decrease or that it will not be increased in 20252026 and beyond. While lower market rates and increased capital markets liquidity supports commercial real estate property transactions and values, regulatedRegulated lending institutions are adjusting their business models to increase capital requirements for direct loans to real estate and thus continue to be constrained in providing capital for commercial real estate properties. Changes in the federal funds rate as well as the other policies of the Federal Reserve affect interest rates, which have a significant impact on our financial condition.
The extent of the continuing impact of these public health and macroeconomic risks on the Company's operational and financial performance and ultimately its Net Asset Value, will depend on current and future developments, including the residual effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the extent to which persistently high interest rates continue to have an adverse impact on the real estate industry andor have a recessionary effect generally.
As a result of the foregoing developments, we are unable to determine what the ultimate impact of general economic conditions will be on our timeline for seeking entitlements and selling properties, and ultimately on the amount of proceeds and distributions from those sales.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
Not available: the section could not be located automatically in one of the filings (non-standard layout or incorporated by reference). See the original filing. Open the filing on SEC.gov.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
Largest changes
Tenant Default. During thesee in full comparisonthree-monthssix-months endedMarchJune31,30, 2026, one of the Company's three largest tenants, representing approximately 10% of rental income, a material portion of the Company’s rental revenue, fell into default under its lease. Management is working with the tenant to restore compliance and believes it is probable that the matter will be resolved without eviction. Management has considered this contingency in its estimates of liquidation and operating costs and believes the current estimates remain adequate. See Note 11 (Concentration of Credit Risk) to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the Company's tenant concentration risk in connection with this default.
“The remeasurement of $1,196,250 in assets and liabilities in liquidation is mainly attributable to employee-restructuring savings of approximately $620,000, a favorable variance in the actual expenses (versus the forecast) for the six-months ending June 30, 2026 of approximately $230,000, a reduction in the budget for land entitlement costs relating to the Cortlandt Manor property of approximately $187,000 and an increase in forecasted revenue due to new leases $140,000.”see in full comparison
Net assets as ofsee in full comparisonMarchJune31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 would result in estimated liquidating distributions of$25,924,002$27,055,247 and $25,858,997, respectively, or approximately$11.79$12.30 and $11.76 per common share, respectively, based on 2,199,308 shares outstanding. The increase of$65,005$1,196,250 in estimated liquidating distributions is mainly attributable to employee-restructuring savings of approximately $620,000, a favorable variance in the actual expenses (versus the forecast) for thequartersix-months endingMarchJune31,30,2026.2026 of approximately $230,000, a reduction in the budget for land entitlement costs relating to the Cortlandt Manor property of approximately $187,000 and an increase in forecasted revenue due to new leases $140,000.
“On April 26, 2022, the Incorporated Village of Head of the Harbor and certain other parties (collectively, the “Petitioners”) commenced a special proceeding under Article 78 of New York’s Civil Practice Law & Rules (the “Article 78 Proceeding”) against the Town of Smithtown and certain other parties, including Gyrodyne, seeking to annul the Planning Board’s determinations relating to the Flowerfield Subdivision Application. …”see in full comparison
We generally finance our operations through cash on hand. On March 7, 2024, the Company closed a rights offering resulting in approximately $4.4 million of net proceeds to the Company, thereby ensuring we could operate from a position of strength through the duration of the liquidation estimated at the time of such offering to be the end of 2026 (but being extended to the end of 2028), to negotiate and enforce purchase agreements and defend our property rights in the Article 78 Proceeding and in any other such proceeding that may arise. Furthermore, certain of the Company’s major vendors have informally agreed to defer payment on 50% of their fees until the first subdivided lot is sold. While these same vendors remain committed to deferring a large portion of their deferred fees (as disclosed in footnote 8), the extended timeline to the end of 2028 is resulting in economic pressure to provide for a yet to be determined partial payment, albeit expected to be less than half of the outstanding liability).see in full comparisonAdditionally,These vendor fee deferrals are informal, unwritten arrangements and are not legally binding contractual obligations. As a result, there can be no assurance that any vendor will continue to honor its deferral, and any vendor could demand accelerated or full payment of its deferred fees onDecemberdifferent6,terms2019,than we have assumed, which would increase demands on our limited working capital and could result in disputes over theCompany’sexistence,Boardamount,oforDirectors approved the Gyrodyne, LLC Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan for Employees and Directors (the “DCP”) effective as of January 1, 2020. The plan is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan maintained for officers and directorsterms of theCompany. Under the DCP, officers and directors may elect to defer a portion of their compensation to the DCP and receive interest on such deferred payments at a fixed rate of 5% (per annum). All DCP benefits will be paid in a single lump sum cash payment on December 15, 2031, unless a Plan of Liquidation is established for Gyrodyne before the distribution date in which case all benefits will be paid in a single lump sum cash payment after execution of an amendment to terminate the DCP (See Deferred Compensation Plan below).deferral.
On November 15, 2017, the Town of Smithtown Planning Board conducted a public hearing in which the Company presented its subdivision plan for the Flowerfield property. On April 11, 2018, the Planning Board determined that the subdivision plan may result in one or more significant environmental impacts which will require the preparation of an EIS. As a result, at the April 11, 2018 Planning Board meeting, the Planning Board issued a SEQRA Positive Declaration, which was rescinded and re-issued by Planning Board Resolution dated May 9, 2018 that included a draft scope and a request for public comments on the scope (i.e., a public scoping process). The then current Town Planning Board Chairman communicated that a Positive Declaration would require up to one year to complete the SEQRA process. The Town issued the Final Scope on July 7, 2018. On August 15, 2018, the Company submitted the Draft EIS to the Town of Smithtown Planning Department prior to the public hearing. The Company received comments on its EIS at the end of the third quarter of 2018 and submitted its response to the Town of Smithtown Planning Department on February 15, 2019. On May 24, 2019, the Company received additional comments on its EIS and submitted its responses to the Town on June 4, 2019. On July 3, 2019, the Company received additional comments on its EIS and submitted its response to the Town of Smithtown Planning Department on August 28, 2019. On September 24, 2019, the Company received additional comments on its EIS and submitted its response to the Town of Smithtown Planning Department on October 25, 2019. The Town of Smithtown Planning Board as Lead Agency under SEQRA adopted a resolution accepting the DEIS as complete for public review on December 11, 2019 and announced a public comment period that closed on January 24, 2020. Furthermore, the Town Planning Board held and closed the public hearing for the DEIS on January 8, 2020. Following the closing of the public comment period, the Company received a copy of the public comments in February 2020. The Company reviewed the public comments and responded by submitting a Final EIS (“FEIS”) on April 20, 2020. Following the receipt of additional comments on May 29 and June 9, 2020, the Company filed its FEIS on July 24, 2020. Following State DOT comments received July 31, 2020 and Town comments dated August 21, 2020, the Company filed a revised FEIS on September 16, 2020 and received new comments on October 16, 2020. The Company filed a revised FEIS on October 29, 2020. Upon addressing final Town comments received December 4, 2020, the Company filed its Final FEIS on December 9, 2020 reflecting an eight-lot subdivision. The FEIS was accepted by the Town Planning Board on March 10, 2021. Following a public comment period that closed on March 31, 2021, the Town of Smithtown forwarded the public comments and the FEIS to the Suffolk County Planning Commission. On May 5, 2021, the Suffolk County Planning Commission voted 5 to 4 to approve the application as a matter for local determination. Based on the fact that less than a majority of the 18 total members (10 members needed) voted to either approve or deny the application, the application is deemed approved as a matter for local determination. Thus, the Smithtown Planning Board may act and approve the matter with a simple majority vote. On September 20, 2021, the Town of Smithtown Conservation Board voted unanimously to recommend the Town of Smithtown Planning Board issue a SEQRA Negative Declaration, Determination of Non -Significance (an environmental Impact Statement is not necessary based on certain stated reasons and approve the Subdivision Application (eight lots inclusive of the lot for the proposed sewage treatment plant). On March 30, 2022, the Smithtown Planning Board voted four to zero with one abstention to adopt the Findings Statement by resolution, closing SEQR and held a public hearing for the approval of the Preliminary Subdivision at the same meeting. Approval of the Preliminary Subdivision was granted at that meeting.see in full comparisonTechnicalThe most recent responses to technical comments on the Final Subdivision Plans received from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services and Suffolk County Department of Public Worksonwere submitted in March10, 2025,2026, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Wetland Permit was issued on October 28, 2024, and New York State Department of Transportation plansare beingwere submitted for NYS 25A-Stony Brook Road in March 2025 (no prior design comments).andWepreparedanticipateforsubmittingresubmission to each agency for theira finalreview and approvals. On April 28, 2025 the Petitioners perfected their appeal on the original Petition. The Petitioners’ memorandumTown oflawSmithtownlargelysubdivisionrepeats their earlier position and arguments, which the Supreme Court previously found to be an insufficient basis for overturning the Planning Board’s determinations. Gyrodyne filed its response to the Appeal on July 25, 2025 and the Town submitted its reply to the Appeal on July 28, 2025. Final Subdivision approval is expectedapplication in the third quarter2026.of 2026 contingent on the owners of lot two’s approval. Once the Town of Smithtown application is filed we expect to receive and respond to comments prior to scheduling a hearing with possible final approval in the first quarter of 2027 (assuming comments are received and responded to promptly), all of which are subject to and contingent on the remaining regulatory process.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (36)
When we use the terms “Gyrodyne,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our,” we mean Gyrodyne, LLC and all entities owned or controlled by us, including non-consolidated entities. References to “common shares” in this report refer to Gyrodyne, LLC’s common shares representing limited liability company interests. References herein to our Quarterly Report are to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-monthssix-months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
The statements made in this Form 10-Q and in other materials the Company has filed or may file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in each case that are not historical facts, contain “forward-looking information” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, both as amended, which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “projects,” “estimates,” “believes,” “seeks,” “could,” “should,” or “continue,” the negative thereof, and other variations or comparable terminology as well as statements regarding the evaluation of liquidation contingencies. These forward-looking statements are based on the current plans and expectations of management and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, risks and uncertainties generally relating to our efforts to enhance the values of our remaining properties and seek the orderly, strategic sale of such properties as soon as reasonably practicable, relating to the Company’s efforts to secure additional capital to properly fund operations through the end of 2028 absent sufficient working capital raised through the combination of property sales or the modification of its existing credit facilities and or new credit facilities, risks associated with the Article 78 Proceeding against the Company and any other litigation that may develop in connection with our efforts to enhance the value of and sell our properties, risks relating to our national marketing campaign led by JLL for the sale of our Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor properties, risks associated with our purchase and sale agreement with B2K (and future purchase and sale agreements for our remaining properties that may be contingent on years-long regulatory contingencies) in light of our financial condition, risks relating to the recent termination of employment of our Chief Operating Officer and the Company's resulting reliance on a single full-time employee to complete the entitlement, marketing, sale and liquidation process, community activism risk, proxy contests and other actions of activist shareholders, regulatory enforcement risk, risks inherent in the real estate markets of Suffolk and Westchester Counties in New York, the potential residual effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, lingering risks relating to the 2023 banking crisis and closure of two major banks (including one with whom we indirectly had a mortgage loan which the FDIC transferred in December 2023 to a new holder following the banks closure), ongoing inflation risk, ongoing interest rate uncertainty, recession uncertainty and supply chain constraints or disruptions and other risks detailed from time to time in the Company’s SEC reports. These and other matters the Company discuss in this Report, or in the documents it incorporates by reference into this Report, may cause actual results to differ from those the Company describes. The Company assumes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Gyrodyne’s corporate strategy is to enhance the value of Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor by pursuing entitlement opportunities to provide purchasers increased development flexibility, and by enhancing the value of our leases. The Board and Management believe the aforementioned strategy will increase the aggregate value for such properties as a whole. The value of the real estate reported in the consolidated statement of net assets as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 includes some, but not all of the potential value impact that may result from such value enhancement efforts. There can be no assurance that our value enhancement efforts will result in property value increases that exceed the costs we incur in such efforts, or even any increase at all.
Gyrodyne’s strategy is to enhance the value of Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor by pursuing entitlement opportunities to provide purchasers with increased development flexibility, and by enhancing the value of our leases. The Company believes the aforementioned strategy will increase the aggregate value for such properties as a whole. The value of the real estate reported in the consolidated statement of net assets as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 includes some but not all of the potential value impact that may result from such value enhancement efforts. There can be no assurance that our value enhancement efforts will result in property value increases that exceed the costs we incur in such efforts, or even any increase at all. Our efforts to generate the highest values for Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor may involve, in limited circumstances, strategies to manage risk and or enhance the net value of Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor to maximize the returns for our shareholders.
On April 26, 2022, the Incorporated Village of Head of the Harbor and certain other parties (collectively, the “Petitioners”) commenced a special proceeding under Article 78 of New York’s Civil Practice Law & Rules (the “Article 78 Proceeding”) against the Town of Smithtown and certain other parties, including Gyrodyne, seeking to annul the Planning Board’s determinations relating to the Flowerfield Subdivision Application. Specifically, the petition commencing the Article 78 Proceeding (the “Petition”) seeks to annul the Planning Board’s (i) approval of a findings statement pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”), dated September 16, 2021, and adopted by the Planning Board on March 30, 2022, concerning the Flowerfield Subdivision Application, and (ii) preliminary approval on March 30, 2022 of the Flowerfield Subdivision Application. The arguments made in the Petition are substantially similar to those made by opponents of the Flowerfield Subdivision Application during the SEQRA and subdivision process. Gyrodyne and the Town of Smithtown are vigorously defending the Planning Board’s determinations against the Petition. In June 2022, Gyrodyne and the Town of Smithtown filed motions to dismiss the Petition. During the third quarter of 2023, the Article 78 Proceeding was re-assigned to a different judge for the second time. On February 6, 2024, the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Suffolk County issued an order (the “Order”), denying the Motions in part and granting them in part. Specifically, the Order (i) denied the Motions as to three individual Petitioners and the St. James-Head of the Harbor Neighborhood Preservation Coalition, Inc., (ii) granted the Motions as to the remaining twenty (20) individual Petitioners and the Village of Head of the Harbor, (iii) denied the branch of Gyrodyne’s motion alleging that Petitioners failed to state a claim. On October 11, 2024, the Supreme Court of the State of New York issued a ruling in favor of the Company dismissing the Petition in its entirety. On October 28, 2024, the Company received a notice of appeal filed by the petitioners in this proceeding seeking to appeal the court’s dismissal of the Petition, citing as grounds for appeal “whether the court erred in denying the petition and dismissed the Article 78 Proceeding, and any and all other issues which may arise upon further review of the record on appeal”.
On November 12, 2024, the petitioners filed a notice of motion to renew and reargue, seeking to have the court direct the respondents to undertake a supplemental environmental impact statement to address retaining of storm water at the property being developed in light of a recent storm, and to annul the resolution approving the preliminary site plan.
On March 17, 2025, the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Suffolk County issued an order denying the appellants motion to stay enforcement of the order, pending hearing and determination of appeal. On March 21, 2025, the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Suffolk County issued an order denying the Petitioners motion to renew and reargue. On April 16, 2025 the Petitioners filed a notice of appeal seeking to appeal the March 17, 2025 order denying the appellants motion to stay enforcement of the order dismissing the Petition pending the appeal.
On April 28, 2025 the Petitioners perfected their appeal on the original Petition (the “Appeal”). The Petitioners’ memorandum of law largely repeats their earlier position and arguments, which the Supreme Court previously found to be an insufficient basis for overturning the Planning Board’s determinations. Gyrodyne filed its response to the Appeal on July 25, 2025, and the Town submitted its reply to the Appeal on July 28, 2025.
Pleadings filed in the Article 78 Proceeding may be accessed through a link (and related instructions) to the New York State Unified Court System which appears on the Company’s website at https://www.gyrodyne.com.
Gyrodyne remains confident in its defense of the appeal, the motion to renew and reargue and the motion to appeal the denial of the Petitioners’ motion to stay enforcement of the order. Gyrodyne believes that both the Article 78 Proceeding (see Part II, Item 1, Legal Proceedings, for a description of its current procedural status) and the process of negotiating purchase agreements, securing final subdivision approval and final unappealable site plan approval and consummating the sale of our properties will extend into 2028, although there can be no assurance that Gyrodyne and the Town of Smithtown will be successful in the defense of the appeal and any other motions or that other factors beyond our control will not necessitate a further extension of the timeline.
Various other factors will continue to impact the timeline to achieve approvals, including the backlog of land use applications, zoning authority labor shortages and environmental concerns. Nevertheless, we will continue to market the properties and, although there can be no assurances, the Company believes subdivision approval will be received in the thirdfirst quarter of 20262027 for Flowerfield, and in 2027mid-2027 for Cortlandt Manor.
Assuming the process of seeking entitlements and selling assets is completed in 2028 and giving effect to the estimated cash flows from the operation of our existing properties, we expect that Gyrodyne will have a cash balance of approximately $25.9$27.06 million, prior to any future special distributions based on the estimate of net assets in liquidation presented in our Consolidated Statements of Net Assets. Such cash would equate to future distributions of $11.79$12.30 per share based on Gyrodyne having 2,199,308 common shares outstanding. These estimated distributions are based on values and outstanding share numbers effective as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and include some but not all of the potential value that may be derived from the entitlement efforts.
The Company intends to seek to modify one or more of its existing loan facilities to strengthen its financial position through the end of 2028, the forecasted completion of the liquidation process. The Company’s goal with respect to any such modification is for its current cash and cash equivalent position post-loan modification to be adequate to fund our process of seeking entitlements and selling assets through such forecasted liquidation completion date. Management believes the Company will need additional capital to properly fund operations through the end of 2028 absent sufficient working capital raised through the combination of property sales or the modification of its existing credit facilities and or new credit facilities, or other alternative capital raising strategies. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be successful in securing any such loan modification/ and/ormodification, new credit facilitiesfacility or alternative capital raising transaction on terms that are satisfactory to the Company or on any terms at all or achieve a timely closing on the sale of a property to address its working capital needs. If such available cash and amounts received on the sale of assets are not adequate to provide for our obligations, liabilities, expenses and claims, distributions of cash and other assets to our shareholders would be eliminated. In the event our shareholders receive distributions from Gyrodyne and there are insufficient funds to pay any creditors who seek payment of claims against Gyrodyne, shareholders could be held liable for payments made to them and could be required to return all or a part of the distributions made to them.
The Company is pursuing entitlements to increase the development flexibility of its Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor properties. During the three-monthssix-months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company incurred approximately $97,500$144,000 of land entitlement costs, consisting primarily of engineering costs, legal fees and real estate taxes to support the Company’s respective entitlement efforts. We estimate that the Company may incur approximately $1.2 million$995,000 in additional land entitlement costs through December 31, 2028 in pursuit of entitlements (approximately $313,000$121,000 in Cortlandt Manor and $916,000$874,000 in Flowerfield).
The entitlement costs for the three-monthssix-months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 associated with the ownership and development of this property were approximately $18,100.$23,200.
On November 15, 2017, the Town of Smithtown Planning Board conducted a public hearing in which the Company presented its subdivision plan for the Flowerfield property. On April 11, 2018, the Planning Board determined that the subdivision plan may result in one or more significant environmental impacts which will require the preparation of an EIS. As a result, at the April 11, 2018 Planning Board meeting, the Planning Board issued a SEQRA Positive Declaration, which was rescinded and re-issued by Planning Board Resolution dated May 9, 2018 that included a draft scope and a request for public comments on the scope (i.e., a public scoping process). The then current Town Planning Board Chairman communicated that a Positive Declaration would require up to one year to complete the SEQRA process. The Town issued the Final Scope on July 7, 2018. On August 15, 2018, the Company submitted the Draft EIS to the Town of Smithtown Planning Department prior to the public hearing. The Company received comments on its EIS at the end of the third quarter of 2018 and submitted its response to the Town of Smithtown Planning Department on February 15, 2019. On May 24, 2019, the Company received additional comments on its EIS and submitted its responses to the Town on June 4, 2019. On July 3, 2019, the Company received additional comments on its EIS and submitted its response to the Town of Smithtown Planning Department on August 28, 2019. On September 24, 2019, the Company received additional comments on its EIS and submitted its response to the Town of Smithtown Planning Department on October 25, 2019. The Town of Smithtown Planning Board as Lead Agency under SEQRA adopted a resolution accepting the DEIS as complete for public review on December 11, 2019 and announced a public comment period that closed on January 24, 2020. Furthermore, the Town Planning Board held and closed the public hearing for the DEIS on January 8, 2020. Following the closing of the public comment period, the Company received a copy of the public comments in February 2020. The Company reviewed the public comments and responded by submitting a Final EIS (“FEIS”) on April 20, 2020. Following the receipt of additional comments on May 29 and June 9, 2020, the Company filed its FEIS on July 24, 2020. Following State DOT comments received July 31, 2020 and Town comments dated August 21, 2020, the Company filed a revised FEIS on September 16, 2020 and received new comments on October 16, 2020. The Company filed a revised FEIS on October 29, 2020. Upon addressing final Town comments received December 4, 2020, the Company filed its Final FEIS on December 9, 2020 reflecting an eight-lot subdivision. The FEIS was accepted by the Town Planning Board on March 10, 2021. Following a public comment period that closed on March 31, 2021, the Town of Smithtown forwarded the public comments and the FEIS to the Suffolk County Planning Commission. On May 5, 2021, the Suffolk County Planning Commission voted 5 to 4 to approve the application as a matter for local determination. Based on the fact that less than a majority of the 18 total members (10 members needed) voted to either approve or deny the application, the application is deemed approved as a matter for local determination. Thus, the Smithtown Planning Board may act and approve the matter with a simple majority vote. On September 20, 2021, the Town of Smithtown Conservation Board voted unanimously to recommend the Town of Smithtown Planning Board issue a SEQRA Negative Declaration, Determination of Non -Significance (an environmental Impact Statement is not necessary based on certain stated reasons and approve the Subdivision Application (eight lots inclusive of the lot for the proposed sewage treatment plant). On March 30, 2022, the Smithtown Planning Board voted four to zero with one abstention to adopt the Findings Statement by resolution, closing SEQR and held a public hearing for the approval of the Preliminary Subdivision at the same meeting. Approval of the Preliminary Subdivision was granted at that meeting. TechnicalThe most recent responses to technical comments on the Final Subdivision Plans received from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services and Suffolk County Department of Public Works onwere submitted in March 10, 2025,2026, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Wetland Permit was issued on October 28, 2024, and New York State Department of Transportation plans are beingwere submitted for NYS 25A-Stony Brook Road in March 2025 (no prior design comments). andWe preparedanticipate forsubmitting resubmission to each agency for theira final review and approvals. On April 28, 2025 the Petitioners perfected their appeal on the original Petition. The Petitioners’ memorandumTown of lawSmithtown largelysubdivision repeats their earlier position and arguments, which the Supreme Court previously found to be an insufficient basis for overturning the Planning Board’s determinations. Gyrodyne filed its response to the Appeal on July 25, 2025 and the Town submitted its reply to the Appeal on July 28, 2025. Final Subdivision approval is expectedapplication in the third quarter 2026.of 2026 contingent on the owners of lot two’s approval. Once the Town of Smithtown application is filed we expect to receive and respond to comments prior to scheduling a hearing with possible final approval in the first quarter of 2027 (assuming comments are received and responded to promptly), all of which are subject to and contingent on the remaining regulatory process.
The entitlement costs for the three-monthssix-months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 associated with the ownership and development of this property consisting of architectural and engineering costs, legal expenses, economic analysis, soil management and surveys were approximately $79,400.$120,900.
While we cannot predict the outcome of the subdivision application, we undertook to subdivide the Flowerfield property in a manner that we believed will result in increased development flexibility in the shortest amount of time and limited risk (i.e., included in our subdivision application is the separation of the existing industrial buildings into two separate lots which upon resolution of the Article 78 Proceeding (See Article 78 Proceeding under Part II, Item 1, Legal Proceedings) and final subdivision approval will allow us to sell the two lots together or separately, without any site plan approval). There can be no assurance, however, that our value enhancement efforts will result in property value increases that exceed the costs we incur in such efforts, or even any increase at all. The pandemic has negatively impacted demand for office (including medical office) and hotel development “on spec”.
Transaction Summary for the Three-MonthsSix-Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026
The following summarizes our significant transactions and other activity during the three-monthssix-months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
Leasing Activity. During the three-monthssix-months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company executed one new lease and onefive renewalrenewals comprising approximately 2,30010,100 square feet, annual revenue of approximately $28,000$198,000 and total commitments of approximately $44,600.$134,500. There were three terminations comprising approximately 6,300 square feet and approximately $95,600 in annual revenue.
Tenant Default. During the three-monthssix-months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, one of the Company's three largest tenants, representing approximately 10% of rental income, a material portion of the Company’s rental revenue, fell into default under its lease. Management is working with the tenant to restore compliance and believes it is probable that the matter will be resolved without eviction. Management has considered this contingency in its estimates of liquidation and operating costs and believes the current estimates remain adequate. See Note 11 (Concentration of Credit Risk) to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the Company's tenant concentration risk in connection with this default.
As reported in footnote three, the Company is on a liquidation basis of accounting. The detailed information regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), President and CEO, is reported in footnote five in detail supporting the estimated liquidation and operating costs net of estimated receipts. This information allows the CODM to manage and forecast any impact the operations have on the estimated real estate value and in the aggregate allows the CODM to calculate estimated distributions. The net assets as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 ($25,924,002$27,055,247) and December 31, 2025 ($25,858,997) results in estimated distributions of approximately $11.79$12.30 and $11.76 per common share, respectively, based on 2,199,308 shares outstanding.
New accounting pronouncements - Management has evaluated the impact of newly issued accounting pronouncements, whether effective or not as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, and has concluded that they will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements since the Company reports on a liquidation basis.
Net assets as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 would result in estimated liquidating distributions of $25,924,002$27,055,247 and $25,858,997, respectively, or approximately $11.79$12.30 and $11.76 per common share, respectively, based on 2,199,308 shares outstanding. The increase of $65,005$1,196,250 in estimated liquidating distributions is mainly attributable to employee-restructuring savings of approximately $620,000, a favorable variance in the actual expenses (versus the forecast) for the quartersix-months ending MarchJune 31,30, 2026.2026 of approximately $230,000, a reduction in the budget for land entitlement costs relating to the Cortlandt Manor property of approximately $187,000 and an increase in forecasted revenue due to new leases $140,000.
The cash balance at the end of the liquidation period (currently estimated to be December 31, 2028, although the estimated completion of the liquidation period may change), excluding any interim distributions, is estimated based on the MarchJune 31,30, 2026 cash balance of $3.95$3.77 million plus adjustments for the following items which are estimated through December 31,2028:
The Company estimates that it will incur approximately $1.2 million$995,000 (included in the consolidated statement of net assets as part of the estimated liquidation and operating costs net of receipts) in land entitlement costs from AprilJuly 2026 through the end of the liquidation period, currently estimated to conclude on or about December 31, 2028, in an effort to obtain entitlements, including special permits. The Company believes the commitment of these resources will enable the Company to position the properties for sale with all entitlements necessary to maximize the aggregate Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor property values and resulting distributions. During the three-monthssix-months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company incurred approximately $97,500$144,000 of land entitlement costs, consisting predominately of engineering fees, legal fees and real estate taxes. The Company believes the remaining balance of $1.2 million$995,000 (inclusive of real estate taxes of $408,000$369,000 and regulatory fees of $407,000) will be incurred from AprilJuly 2026 through the end of the liquidation period. The Company does not intend to develop the properties but rather positioning the properties for increased development flexibility in the shortest period of time with the least amount of risk to the Company. The costs and time frame to achieve the entitlements could change due to a range of factors including a shift in the value of certain entitlements making it more profitable to pursue a different mix of entitlements and the dynamics of the real estate market. As a result, the Company has focused and will continue to focus its land entitlement efforts on achieving the highest and best use while considering the time and direct and indirect costs necessary to achieve such entitlements. During the process of pursuing such entitlements, the Company may entertain offers from potential buyers who may be willing to pay premiums for the properties that the Company finds more acceptable from a timing or value perspective than completing the entitlement processes itself. There can be no assurance that our value enhancement efforts will result in property value increases that exceed the costs we incur in such efforts, or even any increase at all.
Net assets as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 would result in estimated liquidating distributions of $25,924,002$27,055,247 and $25,858,997, or approximately $11.79$12.30 and $11.76 per common share, respectively, based on 2,199,308 shares outstanding based on estimates and other indications of sales value. This estimate of distributions includes projections of costs and expenses to be incurred during the period required to complete the plan of liquidation. There is inherent uncertainty with these projections, and they could change materially based on the timing of the sales, change in values of the Cortlandt Manor and/or Flowerfield properties (whether market driven or resulting from the land entitlement efforts) net of any bonuses, favorable or unfavorable changes in the land entitlement costs, the performance of the underlying assets, the market for commercial real estate properties generally and any changes in the underlying assumptions of the projected cash flows.
The following table summarizes the estimates to arrive at the Net Assets in Liquidation as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 (dollars are in millions).
Gyrodyne’s strategy is to enhance the value of Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor, by pursuing various entitlement opportunities, which the Gyrodyne Board believes will improve the potential of obtaining better aggregate values for such properties as a whole. The pursuit of the highest and best use of Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor may involve other strategies to manage risk and or enhance the net value of Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor to maximize the returns for our shareholders. Gyrodyne intends to dissolve after we complete the disposition of all of our real property assets, apply the proceeds of such dispositions first to settle any debts and claims, pending or otherwise, against Gyrodyne, and then pays distributions to holders of Gyrodyne common shares. Because the Company reports on the liquidation basis of accounting, it no longer presents a statement of operations, and accordingly this discussion addresses changes in net assets in liquidation in lieu of a traditional discussion of results of operations. Therefore, the Company includes in its financial statements the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the three-monthssix-months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 of which is discussed below:
The remeasurement of $1,196,250 in assets and liabilities in liquidation is mainly attributable to employee-restructuring savings of approximately $620,000, a favorable variance in the actual expenses (versus the forecast) for the six-months ending June 30, 2026 of approximately $230,000, a reduction in the budget for land entitlement costs relating to the Cortlandt Manor property of approximately $187,000 and an increase in forecasted revenue due to new leases $140,000.
We generally finance our operations through cash on hand. On March 7, 2024, the Company closed a rights offering resulting in approximately $4.4 million of net proceeds to the Company, thereby ensuring we could operate from a position of strength through the duration of the liquidation estimated at the time of such offering to be the end of 2026 (but being extended to the end of 2028), to negotiate and enforce purchase agreements and defend our property rights in the Article 78 Proceeding and in any other such proceeding that may arise. Furthermore, certain of the Company’s major vendors have informally agreed to defer payment on 50% of their fees until the first subdivided lot is sold. While these same vendors remain committed to deferring a large portion of their deferred fees (as disclosed in footnote 8), the extended timeline to the end of 2028 is resulting in economic pressure to provide for a yet to be determined partial payment, albeit expected to be less than half of the outstanding liability). Additionally,These vendor fee deferrals are informal, unwritten arrangements and are not legally binding contractual obligations. As a result, there can be no assurance that any vendor will continue to honor its deferral, and any vendor could demand accelerated or full payment of its deferred fees on Decemberdifferent 6,terms 2019,than we have assumed, which would increase demands on our limited working capital and could result in disputes over the Company’sexistence, Boardamount, ofor Directors approved the Gyrodyne, LLC Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan for Employees and Directors (the “DCP”) effective as of January 1, 2020. The plan is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan maintained for officers and directorsterms of the Company. Under the DCP, officers and directors may elect to defer a portion of their compensation to the DCP and receive interest on such deferred payments at a fixed rate of 5% (per annum). All DCP benefits will be paid in a single lump sum cash payment on December 15, 2031, unless a Plan of Liquidation is established for Gyrodyne before the distribution date in which case all benefits will be paid in a single lump sum cash payment after execution of an amendment to terminate the DCP (See Deferred Compensation Plan below).deferral.
Additionally, on December 6, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the Gyrodyne, LLC Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan for Employees and Directors (the “DCP”) effective as of January 1, 2020. The plan is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan maintained for officers and directors of the Company. Under the DCP, officers and directors may elect to defer a portion of their compensation to the DCP and receive interest on such deferred payments at a fixed rate of 5% (per annum). All DCP benefits will be paid in a single lump sum cash payment on December 15, 2031, unless a Plan of Liquidation is established for Gyrodyne before the distribution date in which case all benefits will be paid in a single lump sum cash payment after execution of an amendment to terminate the DCP (See Deferred Compensation Plan below).
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company had cash and cash equivalents totaling approximately $3.95$3.77 million. The cash will be partially used to fund our efforts to generate the highest values for the Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor properties while simultaneously pursuing the strategic sale of these properties. The pursuit of the highest values for Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor may involve other investments and or other strategies to manage risk and or enhance the net value of Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor to maximize the returns for our shareholders. The Company is estimating and reporting in the consolidated statements of net assets total gross cash proceeds from the sale of its assets of approximately $53.99 million. Based on the Company’s current cash balance and the above forecast, the Company estimates distributable cash stemming from the liquidation of the Company of approximately $25.92$27.06 million.
The Company intends to seek to modify one or more of its existing loan facilities to strengthen its financial position through the end of 2028, the forecasted completion of the liquidation process. The Company’s goal with respect to any such modification is for its current cash and cash equivalent position post-loan modification to be adequate to fund our process of seeking entitlements and selling assets through such forecasted liquidation completion date. Management believes the Company will need additional capital to properly fund operations through the end of 2028 absent sufficient working capital raised through the combination of property sales or the modification of its existing credit facilities and or new credit facilities, or other alternative capital raising strategies. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be successful in securing any such loan modification/ and/ormodification, new credit facilitiesfacility or alternative capital raising transaction on terms that are satisfactory to the Company or on any terms at all or achieve a timely closing on the sale of a property to address its working capital needs. If such available cash and amounts received on the sale of assets are not adequate to provide for our obligations, liabilities, expenses and claims, distributions of cash and other assets to our shareholders would be eliminated. In the event our shareholders receive distributions from Gyrodyne and there are insufficient funds to pay any creditors who seek payment of claims against Gyrodyne, shareholders could be held liable for payments made to them and could be required to return all or a part of the distributions made to them.
Major elements of the Company’s cashflows for the three-monthssix-months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 were as follows:
GYRO insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
No Form 4 stock transactions in this period.
Well-known investors holding GYRO (13F)
None of the 59 investors we track reported a position in their latest 13F.