Companies › HNNA

HNNA 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

Hennessy Advisors Inc. · Nasdaq · Investment Advice · CIK 1145255 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from Hennessy Advisors Inc.'s public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

4 / 0risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
1new risk-factor headings
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
5Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2025-12-03 (period ending 2025-09-30) with 10-K filed 2024-12-11 (period ending 2024-09-30).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

4new paragraphs
0removed paragraphs
8reworded paragraphs
7,293 → 7,846words in section

New heading “We may use artificial intelligence technologies in our business and operations, and challenges with effectively managing its use could harm our business and expose us to costly liability.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Reworded topics: investigation, litigation, penalt

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Finally, cybersecurity and data privacy are high priorities for many regulators,regulators worldwide, and many jurisdictions have enacted laws and regulations in these areas. EnactmentCompliance ofwith evolving privacy laws orand cybersecurity regulations have,has resulted, and may continue to,to resultresult, in additional costs of compliance or litigation.potential Inlitigation addition,exposure. whileWhile we strive to comply with the relevantapplicable laws and regulations, any failure to complydo so could result in regulatory investigationsinvestigations, andpenalties, penalties as well asor negative publicity, any of which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: tariff, russia, ukraine, israel

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

The securities markets are inherently volatile and may be affected by factors beyond our control, including global economic conditions, industry trends, interest and inflation rate fluctuations, political factors, the imposition of economic sanctions, trade policies and tariffs, public health crises, natural disasters, geopolitical instability and war, including the invasion by Russia into Ukraine and the conflict between Israel and Hamas, as well as actions taken by other countries in response to such conflicts, and other factors that are difficult to predict. Because our assets under management is largely concentrated in equity products, our results are particularly susceptible to downturns in the equity markets. We derive all of our operating revenues from investment advisory fees and shareholder service fees paid to us by the Hennessy Funds. These fees are calculated as a percentage of the average daily net asset value of the Hennessy Funds. Accordingly, our revenues increase or decrease as our average assets under management increases or decreases, which is affected by market appreciation or depreciation and purchases and redemptions of shares of the Hennessy Funds. Changing market conditions could also cause an impairment to the value of our management contract asset.
see in full comparison
New text topics: artificial intelligence
“We may use artificial intelligence technologies in our business and operations, and challenges with effectively managing its use could harm our business and expose us to costly liability.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: investigation, artificial intelligence
“We may incorporate the use of artificial intelligence technologies into our services and operational processes. There are significant risks involved in developing and deploying artificial intelligence technologies, and there can be no assurance that the use of artificial intelligence technologies will enhance our services or be beneficial to our business, including our efficiency or profitability. Data that artificial intelligence applications utilize are likely to contain a degree of inaccuracy and error, which could result in flawed algorithms. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: artificial intelligence, regulation
“There is also uncertainty in the legal and regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence technologies and any laws, regulations, or industry standards adopted in response to the emergence of artificial intelligence technologies may be burdensome, could entail significant costs, and may restrict or impede our ability to successfully deploy artificial intelligence technologies efficiently and effectively.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: artificial intelligence
“The use of artificial intelligence technologies by us and others may exacerbate or create new and unpredictable competitive, operational, legal, and regulatory risks to our business. There is substantial uncertainty about the extent to which artificial intelligence technologies will result in dramatic changes throughout the world, and we may not be able to anticipate, prevent, mitigate, or remediate all of the potential risks, challenges, or impacts of such changes. These changes could potentially disrupt, among other things, our business model and operational processes. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (12)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 1 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

The securities markets are inherently volatile and may be affected by factors beyond our control, including global economic conditions, industry trends, interest and inflation rate fluctuations, political factors, the imposition of economic sanctions, trade policies and tariffs, public health crises, natural disasters, geopolitical instability and war, including the invasion by Russia into Ukraine and the conflict between Israel and Hamas, as well as actions taken by other countries in response to such conflicts, and other factors that are difficult to predict. Because our assets under management is largely concentrated in equity products, our results are particularly susceptible to downturns in the equity markets. We derive all of our operating revenues from investment advisory fees and shareholder service fees paid to us by the Hennessy Funds. These fees are calculated as a percentage of the average daily net asset value of the Hennessy Funds. Accordingly, our revenues increase or decrease as our average assets under management increases or decreases, which is affected by market appreciation or depreciation and purchases and redemptions of shares of the Hennessy Funds. Changing market conditions could also cause an impairment to the value of our management contract asset.

Added

We may use artificial intelligence technologies in our business and operations, and challenges with effectively managing its use could harm our business and expose us to costly liability.

Added

The use of artificial intelligence technologies by us and others may exacerbate or create new and unpredictable competitive, operational, legal, and regulatory risks to our business. There is substantial uncertainty about the extent to which artificial intelligence technologies will result in dramatic changes throughout the world, and we may not be able to anticipate, prevent, mitigate, or remediate all of the potential risks, challenges, or impacts of such changes. These changes could potentially disrupt, among other things, our business model and operational processes. Some of our competitors may incorporate artificial intelligence into their services or operational processes more quickly or more successfully than us, or more effectively use artificial intelligence to drive internal efficiencies or enhance services. If we are unable to adequately advance our capabilities in these areas, or do so at a slower pace than others in our industry, we may be at a competitive disadvantage.

Added

We may incorporate the use of artificial intelligence technologies into our services and operational processes. There are significant risks involved in developing and deploying artificial intelligence technologies, and there can be no assurance that the use of artificial intelligence technologies will enhance our services or be beneficial to our business, including our efficiency or profitability. Data that artificial intelligence applications utilize are likely to contain a degree of inaccuracy and error, which could result in flawed algorithms. This could reduce the effectiveness of artificial intelligence technologies and adversely impact us and our operations to the extent we rely on the work product of such technology in our operations. There is also a risk that artificial intelligence tools or applications may be misused or misappropriated by our employees. For example, an employee may input confidential information, including material non-public information or personally identifiable information, into artificial intelligence technologies, resulting in such information becoming part of a dataset that is accessible by third-party artificial intelligence applications and users. Such actions could subject us to legal and regulatory investigations or actions. Further, we may not be able to control how third-party artificial intelligence technologies that we choose to use are developed or maintained, or how data we input is used or disclosed, even where we have sought contractual protections with respect to these matters. The misuse or misappropriation of our data could have an adverse impact on our reputation and could subject us to legal and regulatory investigations or actions. In addition, artificial intelligence technologies are continuously evolving, and we may incur costs to adopt and deploy artificial intelligence technologies that could become obsolete earlier than expected, and there can be no assurance that we will realize the desired or anticipated benefits from artificial intelligence technologies.

Added

There is also uncertainty in the legal and regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence technologies and any laws, regulations, or industry standards adopted in response to the emergence of artificial intelligence technologies may be burdensome, could entail significant costs, and may restrict or impede our ability to successfully deploy artificial intelligence technologies efficiently and effectively.

Reworded

For the past several years, approximately 75% of our assets under management has been concentrated in five or six of our funds. During fiscal year 2024,2025, our average assets under management was concentrated in the following five funds: (i) the Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (27%34% of average assets under management); (ii) the Hennessy Focus Fund (18%13% of average assets under management); (iii) the Hennessy GasCornerstone UtilityGrowth Fund (12% of average assets under management); (iv) the Hennessy JapanGas Utility Fund (10%11% of average assets under management); and (v) the Hennessy Cornerstone GrowthJapan Fund (9% of average assets under management). Consequently, our revenues followed a similar pattern of concentration: (a) the Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (26%33% of total revenue); (b) the Hennessy Focus Fund (21%16% of total revenue); (c) the Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (12% of total revenue); (d) the Hennessy Japan Fund (10% of total revenue); (d) the Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (9% of total revenue); and (e) the Hennessy CornerstoneGas ValueUtility Fund (8%7% of total revenue). As a result, our operating results are particularly dependent upon the performance of a small number of funds and our ability to maintain and grow assets under management in these funds. These funds have from time to time experienced significant redemptions and may do so again in the future. A significant increase in redemptions for any reason would reduce our assets under management and revenues.

Reworded

We utilize a unitary fee structure for the Hennessy Stance ESGSustainable ETF, and we bear the risk that the Fund’s operating expenses may increase and lead to a reduction in our revenues from the fund.

Reworded

The Hennessy Stance ESGSustainable ETF pays us a unitary fee under its investment advisory agreement with us. Under a unitary fee structure, we bear all operating expenses incurred in connection with providing services to the fund. The operating expenses covered by the unitary fee include third party data providers, transfer agency, custody, fund administration, legal, audit and other services. Additionally, for no compensation, we pay all other operating expenses of the fund, including sub-advisory fees, with the exception of the following: (i) the management fees paid to us; (ii) distribution fees and expenses paid by the fund under any distribution plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act; (iii) interest expenses; (iv) brokerage expenses, trading expenses, and other expenses (such as stamp taxes) in connection with the execution of portfolio transactions or in connection with creation or redemption transactions; (v) compensation paid to the independent trustees of the fund and fees paid to independent trustees’ counsel; (vi) tax expenses and governmental fees; and (vii) extraordinary expenses not incurred in the course of ordinary business (the “Excluded Fees”). The fund and its shareholders bear the costs of Excluded Fees. The unitary fee structure generally eliminates the possibility for any decrease in the total fund expense ratio during periods when assets under management increase, which could lead to increased profitability for us if we are able to achieve economies of scale. On the other hand, if the fund’s operating expenses increase (other than Excluded Fees), this will lead to a reduction in our profitability from the fund.

Reworded

Generally, if a sub‑advisor experiences a change of control but we do not, we could continue acting as an advisor to the applicable Hennessy Fund, but the shareholders of such Hennessy Fund would have to approve a new sub‑advisory agreement for the sub‑advisor. However, for the Hennessy Stance ESGSustainable ETF, we have the authority to appoint and replace unaffiliated sub‑advisors and to enter into and make material amendments to the related sub‑advisory agreements without shareholder approval. This is because we sought and received an exemptive order from the SEC in 2023 to operate under a manager of managers structure and subsequently obtained shareholder approval to implement such structure for the Hennessy Stance ESGSustainable ETF. Under the manager of managers structure, we have ultimate responsibility, subject to oversight of and approval by the Hennessy Funds’ Board of Trustees, for overseeing the Hennessy Funds’ unaffiliated sub-advisors and recommending their hiring, termination, or replacement. We have not yet received, and do not have an estimated timeline for receiving, shareholder approval to operate under a manager of managers structure for the Hennessy Mutual Funds that are sub‑advised.

Reworded

We dependrely on information technology,technology and anyinfrastructure. Any failures of orof, damage to, attack on or unauthorized access to our information technology systems or facilities, or those of third parties with whichwhom we doconduct business, including as a result of cyber ‑attacks, could resultsignificantly in significant limits onlimit our ability to conduct our operations andeffectively, activities,increase our costs, and cause reputational damage.

Reworded

If anymaterial ofinformation thesesecurity eventsincidents wereoccur toin occur,the future, we could suffer aexperience financial loss,losses, abusiness disruption of our business,disruptions, liability to the Hennessy Funds and their investors, regulatory intervention, or reputational damage, any of which could have abe material adverseand effectcould onmaterially adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. We also may be required to expend significant additional resources to modifystrengthen our protective measures or to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures. In addition, our cybersecurity insurance may not cover all losses and damages from such events and our ability to maintain or obtain sufficient insurance coverage in the future may be limited.

Reworded

Finally, cybersecurity and data privacy are high priorities for many regulators,regulators worldwide, and many jurisdictions have enacted laws and regulations in these areas. EnactmentCompliance ofwith evolving privacy laws orand cybersecurity regulations have,has resulted, and may continue to,to resultresult, in additional costs of compliance or litigation.potential Inlitigation addition,exposure. whileWhile we strive to comply with the relevantapplicable laws and regulations, any failure to complydo so could result in regulatory investigationsinvestigations, andpenalties, penalties as well asor negative publicity, any of which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

6new paragraphs
5removed paragraphs
21reworded paragraphs
4,609 → 4,370words in section

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: inflation, interest rate, labor
“Yields on long-term U.S. bonds decreased meaningfully during the one‑year period ended September 30, 2024, as the Federal Reserve has started to lower its benchmark interest rate. After the rate cut in September 2024, investors appear to have continued to price in further reductions in interest rates. According to Bloomberg, the market is currently pricing in nearly two more rate cuts by the end of the year and roughly six rate cuts by the end of 2025. Recent inflation data seems to have calmed the nerves of investors who feared that inflation would continue to be a headwind. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: inflation, interest rate
“U.S. equities had strong, positive performance for the one‑year period ended September 30, 2024, with the S&P 500® Index returning 36.35% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average returning 28.85% for the period (on a total return basis). Equity prices advanced in anticipation of the Federal Reserve lowering its benchmark interest rate, which ultimately happened in September. Further, the markets have appeared to continue pricing in the prospect of several more rate cuts over the next year as market participants have appeared to continue to view recent inflation data in a favorable light. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: inflation, interest rate
“U.S. equities had strong, positive performance for the one‑year period ended September 30, 2025, with the S&P 500® Index returning 17.60% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average returning 11.50% for the period (on a total return basis). Equity prices advanced in anticipation of the Federal Reserve lowering its benchmark interest rate in September. Further, the markets, according to Bloomberg, are pricing in roughly two rate cuts in 2025 and four rate cuts by the end of 2026. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: inflation, labor
“Yields on long-term U.S. bonds increased during the one‑year period ended September 30, 2025, as inflation continues to hover above the Federal Reserve’s target inflation rate of 2%. Despite this, investors appear to have started to increasingly focus on softer economic and employment data to support the belief that the Federal Reserve will continue to be more accommodative over the next year. The August employment report indicated that the unemployment rate climbed to 4.3%, which is near a four-year high. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: inflation, interest rate
“The Japanese equity market increased 21.6% (in U.S. dollar terms) for the one‑year period ended September 30, 2024, as measured by the Tokyo Stock Price Index (TOPIX). In our view, business sentiment in Japan remains strong, with the Bank of Japan stating that it expects large companies to increase capital spending by 10.6% in the current fiscal year through March 2025. Bank of Japan Governor Kazuo Ueda has said that the central bank will continue to raise interest rates as long as business conditions remain strong, which is expected to help keep inflation under control around 2.0%.”
see in full comparison
New text
“The Japanese equity market increased 17.73% (in U.S. dollar terms) for the one‑year period ended September 30, 2025, as measured by the Tokyo Stock Price Index (TOPIX). Strong performance has largely been the result of a weaker yen enhancing the competitiveness of Japan’s exports abroad. Foreign capital inflows, buoyed by an increased emphasis on shareholder friendly corporate governance efforts have helped as well. Reforms aimed at improving capital efficiency among corporations have raised investor expectations of increased public company returns.”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (32)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 9 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Added

U.S. equities had strong, positive performance for the one‑year period ended September 30, 2025, with the S&P 500® Index returning 17.60% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average returning 11.50% for the period (on a total return basis). Equity prices advanced in anticipation of the Federal Reserve lowering its benchmark interest rate in September. Further, the markets, according to Bloomberg, are pricing in roughly two rate cuts in 2025 and four rate cuts by the end of 2026. While inflation remains above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target, the market seems to be comfortable with underlying economic fundamentals. Based on expected third quarter earnings for companies in the S&P 500, the market is projecting, according to FactSet Earnings Insight, strong revenue growth and even stronger earnings growth for S&P 500 companies. The prospect of strong margins, driven by pricing power and expense controls, has likely provided relief to market participants that are concerned over the prospect of slowing economic growth.

Added

Yields on long-term U.S. bonds increased during the one‑year period ended September 30, 2025, as inflation continues to hover above the Federal Reserve’s target inflation rate of 2%. Despite this, investors appear to have started to increasingly focus on softer economic and employment data to support the belief that the Federal Reserve will continue to be more accommodative over the next year. The August employment report indicated that the unemployment rate climbed to 4.3%, which is near a four-year high. ADP Research estimated a loss of 32,000 private sector jobs last month and Carlyle Group’s “shadow” labor report shows similar weakness in employment trends. While expected real GDP growth for 2025 was recently revised up to 1.8%, according to Bloomberg, it is nonetheless well off the nearly 3% year-over-year growth seen in 2023 and 2024.

Added

The Japanese equity market increased 17.73% (in U.S. dollar terms) for the one‑year period ended September 30, 2025, as measured by the Tokyo Stock Price Index (TOPIX). Strong performance has largely been the result of a weaker yen enhancing the competitiveness of Japan’s exports abroad. Foreign capital inflows, buoyed by an increased emphasis on shareholder friendly corporate governance efforts have helped as well. Reforms aimed at improving capital efficiency among corporations have raised investor expectations of increased public company returns.

Removed

U.S. equities had strong, positive performance for the one‑year period ended September 30, 2024, with the S&P 500® Index returning 36.35% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average returning 28.85% for the period (on a total return basis). Equity prices advanced in anticipation of the Federal Reserve lowering its benchmark interest rate, which ultimately happened in September. Further, the markets have appeared to continue pricing in the prospect of several more rate cuts over the next year as market participants have appeared to continue to view recent inflation data in a favorable light. While lower short-term interest rates have propelled the market higher, a strong second quarter earnings season and the expectation of a reasonably robust third quarter earnings season seem to have given investors increased confidence that the economy is on firm footing. According to Bloomberg, consensus estimates call for the economy to grow 2.6% in 2024. While that rate is slightly behind last year’s growth rate of 2.9%, we believe it is nonetheless a stronger rate than many had predicted at the beginning of the year.

Removed

Yields on long-term U.S. bonds decreased meaningfully during the one‑year period ended September 30, 2024, as the Federal Reserve has started to lower its benchmark interest rate. After the rate cut in September 2024, investors appear to have continued to price in further reductions in interest rates. According to Bloomberg, the market is currently pricing in nearly two more rate cuts by the end of the year and roughly six rate cuts by the end of 2025. Recent inflation data seems to have calmed the nerves of investors who feared that inflation would continue to be a headwind. Inflation data released for September 2024 indicated that consumer prices increased 2.4% from a year earlier, compared to 2.5% in August 2024, according to the Labor Department. The 2.4% rate is the smallest annual increase since February 2021 and now only modestly above the Federal Reserve’s stated goal of 2.0% inflation. For the one‑year period ended September 30, 2024, 10-year U.S. Treasury Note yields fell from approximately 4.57% to 3.78%.

Removed

The Japanese equity market increased 21.6% (in U.S. dollar terms) for the one‑year period ended September 30, 2024, as measured by the Tokyo Stock Price Index (TOPIX). In our view, business sentiment in Japan remains strong, with the Bank of Japan stating that it expects large companies to increase capital spending by 10.6% in the current fiscal year through March 2025. Bank of Japan Governor Kazuo Ueda has said that the central bank will continue to raise interest rates as long as business conditions remain strong, which is expected to help keep inflation under control around 2.0%.

Reworded

Against this positive equity performance backdrop, all 17 Hennessy Funds posted positive returns for the one‑year periodand three-year periods ended September 30, 2024.2025. The longer‑term performance numbers remain strong, with 15 of the Hennessy Funds posting positive returns for the three-year period ended September 30, 2024. Finally, all 16 Hennessy Funds with at least 10 years of operating history postedposting positive returns for both the 5-year and 10‑year periods ended September 30, 2024.2025.

Reworded

Total assets under management as of the end of fiscal year 20242025 was $4.6$4.2 billion, ana increasedecrease of $1.6$0.40 billion, or 53.1%,8.6%, compared to the end of fiscal year 2023.2024. The increasedecrease in total assets was attributable to market appreciation, net inflowsoutflows offrom the Hennessy Funds, and thewas purchasepartly of assets related to the management of two mutual funds previously managedoffset by CCMmarket that were reorganized into the Hennessy Stance ESG ETF.appreciation.

Reworded

The principal asset on our balance sheet, the management contract asset, represents the capitalized costs incurred in connection with the purchase of assets related to the management of investment funds. As of the end of fiscal year 2024,2025, this asset had a net balance of $82.3$82.6 million, an increase of $1.0$0.3 million since the end of fiscal year 2023.2024. This increase is related to the purchasecosts ofassociated assets related towith the managementdefinitive ofagreement twosigned mutualwith fundsSTF previouslyManagement, managed by CCM that were reorganized into the Hennessy Stance ESG ETF. (See Note 5LP in ItemMarch 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”)2025.

Reworded

Our total assets under management as of the end of fiscal year 20242025 was $4.6$4.2 billion, ana increasedecrease of $1.6$0.40 billion, or 53.1%,8.6%, compared to the end of fiscal year 2023.2024. The primary sources of our revenues, liquidity, and cash flow are our investment advisory fees and shareholder service fees, which are based on, and generated by, our average assets under management. Our average assets under management for fiscal year 20242025 was $3.7$4.5 billion. As of the end of fiscal year 2024,2025, we had cash and cash equivalents of $63.9$72.4 million.

Removed

The increase in cash used in investing activities of $0.5 million was due to the purchase of assets related to the management of two mutual funds previously managed by CCM that were reorganized into the Hennessy Stance ESG STF.

Reworded

The increasedecrease in cash used in financinginvesting activities of $0.2$0.6 million was due to repurchasescosts related to the purchase of sharesthe underlyingCCM vested restricted stock units (“RSUs”) from employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations arisingFunds in connectionthe prior year being greater than costs associated with the vestingdefinitive ofagreement RSUssigned with STF Management, LP in the current period.year.

Added

The increase in cash used in financing activities of $0.1 million was due to repurchases of shares underlying RSUs from employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations arising in connection with the vesting of RSUs in the current period.

Reworded

Dividend Payments. We have consistently paid dividends each year since 2005. Our quarterly dividend rate per share remained constant during fiscal years 20242025 and 2023,2024, and our dividend payments totaled $4.3 million and $4.2 million in each such fiscal year.years 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Reworded

We collect investment advisory fees from each Hennessy Fund at differing annual rates. These annual rates range between 0.40% and 1.25% of average daily net assets. Average daily net assets of the Hennessy Funds for fiscal year 20242025 was $3.7$4.5 billion, which represents an increase of $0.7$0.8 billion, or 23.2%,21.6%, compared to fiscal year 2023.2024. The Hennessy Fund with the largest average daily net assets for fiscal year 20242025 was the Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund, with $981$1.5 million.billion. We collect an investment advisory fee from the Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund at an annual rate of 0.74% of average daily net assets. The Hennessy Fund with the second largest average daily net assets for fiscal year 20242025 was the Hennessy Focus Fund, with $645$573 million. We collect an investment advisory fee from the Hennessy Focus Fund at an annual rate of 0.90% of average daily net assets. However, we pay a sub‑advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.29% to the fund’s sub‑advisor, which reduces the net operating profit contribution of the fund to our financial operations.

Reworded

Total assets under management as of the end of fiscal year 20242025 was $4.6$4.2 billion, ana increasedecrease of $1.6$0.40 billion, or 53.1%,8.6%, compared to the end of fiscal year 2023.2024. The increasedecrease in total assets was attributable to market appreciation, net inflowsoutflows offrom the Hennessy Funds, andpartly the purchase of assets related to the management of two mutual funds previously managedoffset by CCMmarket that were reorganized into the Hennessy Stance ESG ETF.appreciation.

Reworded

The only Hennessy FundsFund with the three largest amounts of net inflows werewas as follows:

Reworded

Redemptions as a percentage of assets under management decreasedincreased from an average of 2.5% per month during fiscal year 2023 to an average of 2.3% per month during fiscal year 2024.2024 to an average of 3.6% per month during fiscal year 2025.

Reworded

Comparing fiscal year 20232024 to fiscal year 2024,2025, total operating expenses increased by 17.5%,7.8%, from $17.7$20.8 million to $20.8$22.4 million. As a percentage of total revenue, total operating expenses decreased 3.57.1 percentage points to 70.1%.63.0%. The increase in dollar value of operating expenses was primarily due to increases in compensation and benefits and generalfund distribution and administrativeother expenses.

Reworded

General and Administrative Expense: Comparing fiscal year 20232024 to fiscal year 2024,2025, general and administrative expense increaseddecreased by 18.3%2.8% from $5.5$6.5 million to $6.5$6.3 million. As a percentage of total revenue, general and administrative expense decreased 0.94.2 percentage points to 21.9%.17.7%. The dollar value increasedecrease in general and administrative expense was primarily due to increasesa decrease in sales and distribution expenses (not including fees paid to various financial institutions that offer the Hennessy Funds as potential investments to their clients, which are reflected in “Fund Distribution and Other Expense”), as well as professional services expenses,expense in the current period.

Added

Fund Distribution and Other Expense: Fund distribution and other expense consists primarily of financial institution fees incurred by us for distribution of the Hennessy Funds and also for the operations of the Hennessy Sustainable ETF. Fund distribution and other expense does not include sub‑advisory fees, which are shown separately.

Reworded

Fund Distribution and Other Expense: The distribution component of fund distribution and other expense consists of fees paid to various financial institutions that offer the Hennessy Funds as potential investments to their clients. When the Hennessy Funds are purchased through one of these financial institutions, the institution typically charges an asset‑based fee, which is recorded as a fund distribution expense on our statement of operations to the extent paid by us. The Hennessy Mutual Funds, withbut the exception ofnot the Hennessy Stance ESGSustainable ETF, may be purchased directly,directly and when purchased directly, we do not incur any such expense. These fees generally increase or decrease in line with the net assets of the Hennessy Funds held through these financial institutions, which are affected by inflows, outflows, and fund performance. In addition, some financial institutions charge a minimum fee if the average daily net assets of a Hennessy Fund held by such an institution are less than a threshold amount. In such cases, we pay the minimum fee.

Reworded

The other component of fund distribution and other expense consists of fees incurred by us for the operations of the Hennessy Stance ESGSustainable ETF. We receive a unitary investment advisory fee from the Hennessy Stance ESGSustainable ETF and then pay all of its operating expenses (with limited exceptions), including fund administration, fund accounting, transfer agency, custody, licensing, audit, and tax services.

Reworded

Comparing fiscal year 2023 2024 to fiscal year 2024, 2025, fund distribution and other expense increased by 68.3%, 25.9%, from $0.49 $0.8 million to $0.82 $1.0 million. As a percentage of total revenue, fund distribution and other expense increased 0.8 0.1 percentage points to 2.8%. 2.9%. The increase of fund distribution and other expense was due to increased average daily net assets of the Hennessy Mutual Funds, which in turn increases the fees we pay to financial institutions. Additionally, fund distribution and other expense increased due to the additional expenses relating to the Hennessy Stance ESG ETF resulting from the purchase of assets related to the management of the two mutual funds previously managed by CCM that were reorganized into the Hennessy Stance ESG ETF.

Reworded

Sub-Advisory Fees Expense: Comparing fiscal year 20232024 to fiscal year 2024,2025, sub‑advisory fees expense increaseddecreased by 10.9%,0.5%, from $3.8$4.2 million to $4.2$4.1 million. As a percentage of total revenue, sub‑advisory fees expense decreased 1.52.4 percentage points to 14.1%.11.7%. The dollar value increasedecrease in sub‑advisory fees expense was due to ana increasedecrease in average daily net assets of the sub‑advised Hennessy Funds, with an additional increase due to the expense associated with new sub‑advisory relationships relating to the Hennessy Stance ESG ETF that began in December 2022.Funds.

Reworded

Depreciation Expense: Comparing fiscal year 20232024 to fiscal year 2024,2025, depreciation expense increased by 6.1%18.9% from $0.23$0.2 million to $0.24$0.3 million due to additional fixed asset purchases.million. As a percentage of total revenue, depreciation expense decreasedremained 0.2the percentagesame pointsat 0.8% in both periods. The dollar value increase in depreciation expense was due to 0.8%.additional fixed asset purchases.

Reworded

Comparing fiscal year 20232024 to fiscal year 2024,2025, interest income increaseddecreased from $2.52$3.1 million to $3.11$2.8 million. The increasedecrease was due to increaseddecreased interest ratesrates, andpartly offset by increased principal balances.

Reworded

Comparing fiscal year 20232024 to fiscal year 2024,2025, interest expense increased by 0.8% from $2.26$2.28 million to $2.28$2.29 million. The increase in interest expense was due to the manner in which interest expense is calculated underin U.S.accordance GAAP.with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The issuance costs related to the 2026 Notes that have been capitalized are amortized over time and therefore increase the carrying amount of the 2026 Notes. As the carrying amount of the 2026 Notes increases, the interest expense on the 2026 Notes for financial statement purposes also increases.

Reworded

Comparing fiscal year 20232024 to fiscal year 2024,2025, income tax expense increased by 42.5%,40.4%, from $1.8$2.6 million to $2.6$3.7 million. The increase in income tax expense was due to higher net operating income in the current period, partially offset by a lower effective income tax rate in the current period. The lower effective tax rate in the current period is due to an increased tax benefit in the current period due to restricted stock vesting at a higher share price.

Reworded

The management contracts we have purchased are considered intangible assets with an indefinite life and we account for them in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 350: Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (“ASC 350”). Pursuant to ASC 350, an entity first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative impairment test. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. If an entity determines that it is more likely than not that an indefinite‑lived intangible asset is impaired, then it must conduct an impairment analysis. We were able to forego the annual impairmentquantitative analysis for fiscal year 20242025 as the more-likely-than-not threshold was not met as of the end of fiscal year 2024.2025.

Added

See Note 1(k) of the Notes to Financial Statements for a discussion of recently issued and adopted accounting standards.

Removed

There have been no other significant changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates during fiscal year 2024.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-08-05 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-05-06 (period ending 2026-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

We could not find a separate Risk Factors item in the latest 10-Q. Some companies leave it out of quarterly reports; see the annual 10-K risk factors and the original filing. Open the filing on SEC.gov.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

10new paragraphs
9removed paragraphs
30reworded paragraphs
4,571 → 4,563words in section

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: artificial intelligence, israel, middle east, labor
“On a total return basis, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 14.18% for the nine months ended June 30, 2026. During the most recent quarter, equity prices advanced despite heightened geopolitical risks, predominantly in the Middle East. Strong corporate earnings reports from the first quarter have reassured investors that the fundamental backdrop for equities is sound. While investors continue to closely monitor peace talks between the United States, Israel and Iran, the increased adoption of and interest in artificial intelligence has been a boon for the stock market. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: israel, inflation, interest rate
“On a total return basis, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 0.71% for the six months ended March 31, 2026. During the most recent quarter, equity prices declined as geopolitical fears coupled with prospective interest rate cuts have seemed to cause investors to reconsider the case for continued economic growth. A joint United States and Israeli military campaign against Iran has had the effect of both spiking oil prices and closing the Strait of Hormuz, a key oil and gas shipping channel. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: middle east, inflation, interest rate
“Long-term U.S. bond yields rose during the three months ended June 30, 2026. With the unrest in the Middle East and the uncertainty in the Strait of Hormuz, energy prices remain elevated, despite coming down in recent months. These disruptions have given rise to inflation concerns. According to data compiled by Bloomberg, Federal Funds futures no longer price in the chance for a rate cut in 2026. Rather, there is a reasonable chance, based on this data, that the Federal Reserve will raise its benchmark interest rate before the end of the year. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: middle east, inflation
“Long-term U.S. bond yields rose during the three months ended March 31, 2026. Higher oil and gas prices may portend a higher level of inflation, especially if a resolution with Iran is not reached soon. Before the conflict in the Middle East, inflation remained above the Federal Reserve’s 2% goal but was slowly making progress toward that goal. Projections compiled by Bloomberg estimate that the Consumer Price Index will advance by 3.1% in 2026, after increasing by 2.7% in 2025.”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: inflation

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

The Japanese equity market was up 4.69%17.24% in U.S. dollar terms over the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as measured by the Tokyo Stock Price Index. During the period, Japanese equities traded higher as aggressivethe corporateboom governancein reforms,artificial aintelligence weakand yensemiconductor boostingdemand exportercoupled profits,with aan returnaccommodative political agenda seemed to moderatehave inflation,given andhope renewedto foreigninvestors investmentfor drovesustained aneconomic increase in share values.growth.
see in full comparison
Removed text
“On October 20, 2021, we completed a public offering of the 2026 Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $40.25 million, which included the full exercise of the underwriters’ overallotment option. The 2026 Notes mature on December 31, 2026, and may now be redeemed in whole or in part at any time or from time to time at our option. The 2026 Notes bear interest at 4.875% per annum, payable on the last day of each calendar quarter and at maturity, beginning December 31, 2021. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (49)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 2 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Added

On a total return basis, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 14.18% for the nine months ended June 30, 2026. During the most recent quarter, equity prices advanced despite heightened geopolitical risks, predominantly in the Middle East. Strong corporate earnings reports from the first quarter have reassured investors that the fundamental backdrop for equities is sound. While investors continue to closely monitor peace talks between the United States, Israel and Iran, the increased adoption of and interest in artificial intelligence has been a boon for the stock market. Employment and wage growth also remain on firm footing. The Bureau of Labor Statistics, for June, reported that unemployment stands at 4.2% with year-over-year average hourly earnings increasing 3.5%. These reports run counter to skeptics pointing out that the adoption of artificial intelligence could wreak havoc on employment trends.

Added

Long-term U.S. bond yields rose during the three months ended June 30, 2026. With the unrest in the Middle East and the uncertainty in the Strait of Hormuz, energy prices remain elevated, despite coming down in recent months. These disruptions have given rise to inflation concerns. According to data compiled by Bloomberg, Federal Funds futures no longer price in the chance for a rate cut in 2026. Rather, there is a reasonable chance, based on this data, that the Federal Reserve will raise its benchmark interest rate before the end of the year. This contrasts sharply with data from early January that indicated the market was pricing in roughly two interest rate cuts by the end of 2026.

Removed

On a total return basis, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 0.71% for the six months ended March 31, 2026. During the most recent quarter, equity prices declined as geopolitical fears coupled with prospective interest rate cuts have seemed to cause investors to reconsider the case for continued economic growth. A joint United States and Israeli military campaign against Iran has had the effect of both spiking oil prices and closing the Strait of Hormuz, a key oil and gas shipping channel. The uncertainty around the potential length of the action and its implications for oil and gas prices has caused global unease. The immediate effect of these dynamics has been rising gasoline prices, the prospect of dampened consumer spending, and the possibility of increased inflation. While the bond market had been expecting two interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve in 2026, currently the bond market is not pricing in any rate cuts this year on account of an expectation of elevated rates of inflation returning, according to Bloomberg.

Removed

Long-term U.S. bond yields rose during the three months ended March 31, 2026. Higher oil and gas prices may portend a higher level of inflation, especially if a resolution with Iran is not reached soon. Before the conflict in the Middle East, inflation remained above the Federal Reserve’s 2% goal but was slowly making progress toward that goal. Projections compiled by Bloomberg estimate that the Consumer Price Index will advance by 3.1% in 2026, after increasing by 2.7% in 2025.

Reworded

The Japanese equity market was up 4.69%17.24% in U.S. dollar terms over the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as measured by the Tokyo Stock Price Index. During the period, Japanese equities traded higher as aggressivethe corporateboom governancein reforms,artificial aintelligence weakand yensemiconductor boostingdemand exportercoupled profits,with aan returnaccommodative political agenda seemed to moderatehave inflation,given andhope renewedto foreigninvestors investmentfor drovesustained aneconomic increase in share values.growth.

Reworded

For the one‑, three‑, five-, and ten yearten-year periods ending MarchJune 31,30, 2026, all 17 Hennessy Funds posted positive total returns (except that the Hennessy Sustainable ETF does not have ten years of performance history).

Reworded

Total assets under management as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, was $3.9$4.4 billion, aan decreaseincrease of $0.3$0.1 billion, or 7.8%,2.6%, compared to MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The decreaseincrease in total assets was attributable to market appreciation, substantially offset by net outflows from the Hennessy Funds, partly offset by market appreciation.Funds.

Reworded

The following table illustrates the quarter‑by‑quarter changes in our assets under management since the quarter ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025:

Reworded

As stated above, the fees we receive for providing investment advisory and shareholder services are based on average assets under management. The following table shows average assets under management for each quarter since the quarter ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025:

Reworded

The principal asset on our balance sheet, the management contract asset, represents the capitalized costs incurred in connection with the purchase of the assets related to the management of investment funds. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, this asset had a net balance of $82.3 million, compared to $82.6 million as of September 30, 2025. This decrease is related to a current period expense of previously capitalized costs as a result of the termination on January 1, 2026 of the definitive agreement signed with STF Management, LP in March 2025.

Added

Following the redemption of the 2026 Notes, as discussed in Note 8, the principal liability on our balance sheet is the net deferred tax liability of $17.4 million arising from the continued write-off of our management contracts asset for tax purposes, which creates a book-to-tax difference.

Removed

On October 20, 2021, we completed a public offering of the 2026 Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $40.25 million, which included the full exercise of the underwriters’ overallotment option. The 2026 Notes mature on December 31, 2026, and may now be redeemed in whole or in part at any time or from time to time at our option. The 2026 Notes bear interest at 4.875% per annum, payable on the last day of each calendar quarter and at maturity, beginning December 31, 2021. The 2026 Notes are direct unsecured obligations, rank equally in right of payment with any of our future unsecured unsubordinated indebtedness, senior to any of our future indebtedness that expressly provides that it is subordinate to the 2026 Notes, effectively subordinate to all of our future secured indebtedness, and structurally subordinate to all future indebtedness and other obligations of any future subsidiaries of ours.

Removed

The 2026 Notes are the principal liability on our balance sheet at $40.0 million, net of issuance costs. At December 31, 2025, the 2026 Notes were reclassified from long-term to current as the maturity date is within twelve months.

Reworded

We continually review our capital requirements to ensure that we have funding available to support our business model. Management anticipates that cash and other liquid assets on hand as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, will be sufficient to meet our capital requirements for one year from the issuance date of this report, as well as our longer-term capital requirements for periods beyond one year from the issuance date of this report. To the extent that liquid resources and cash provided by operations are not adequate to meet long-term capital requirements, management plans to raise additional capital by either, or both, seeking bank financing or accessing the capital markets. There can be no assurance that we will be able to raise additional capital.

Reworded

As discussed above, on October 20, 2021, we completed a public offering of our 2026 Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $40.25 million. The 2026 Notes mature on December 31, 2026, and may now bewere redeemed in whole oron inJune part30, at any time or from time to time at our option.2026.

Reworded

Our total assets under management as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, was $3.9$4.4 billion, aan decreaseincrease of $0.3$0.1 billion, or 7.8%,2.6%, compared to MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The primary sources of our revenue, liquidity, and cash flow are our investment advisory fees and shareholder service fees, which are based on and generated by our average assets under management. Our average assets under management for the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, was $4.2 billion, a decrease of $0.6$0.4 billion, or 12.9%,7.8%, compared to the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had cash and cash equivalents of $73.0$35.4 million.million and no debt.

Reworded

The decrease in cash used in investing activities of $0.1$0.3 million was due to decreasedcapitalized purchasescosts ofassociated propertywith anda equipmentformer asset purchase agreement in the currentprevious period.

Reworded

The increase in cash used in financing activities of $0.1$40.5 million was due to the increased dollar amountredemption of dividends paid as a result of an increased dividend rate and having more shares outstanding in the current2026 periodNotes thanon inJune the30, prior comparable period.2026.

Removed

Total revenue comprises investment advisory fees and shareholder service fees. Comparing the three months ended March 31, 2025, to the three months ended March 31, 2026, total revenue decreased by 12.3%, from $9.3 million to $8.1 million, investment advisory fees decreased by 12.6%, from $8.7 million to $7.6 million, and shareholder service fees decreased by 8.5%, from $0.60 million to $0.55 million. Comparing the six months ended March 31, 2025, to the six months ended March 31, 2026, total revenue decreased by 13.3%, from $19.0 million to $16.5 million, investment advisory fees decreased by 13.5%, from $17.7 million to $15.3 million, and shareholder service fees decreased by 11.1%, from $1.3 million to $1.1 million.

Reworded

Total revenue comprises investment advisory fees and shareholder service fees. Comparing the three months ended June 30, 2025, to the three months ended June 30, 2026, total revenue increased by 4.2%, from $8.1 million to $8.4 million, investment advisory fees increased by 4.2%, from $7.5 million to $7.8 million, and shareholder service fees increased by 3.1%, from $0.5 million to $0.6 million. In eachthe three-month period, the decreaseincrease in investment advisory fees was due mainly to decreasedincreased average daily net assets of the Hennessy Funds,Funds in the current period, and the decreaseincrease in shareholder service fees was due to aan decreaseincrease in the average daily net assets held in Investor Class shares of the Hennessy Mutual Funds.Funds in the current period. Assets held in Investor Class shares of the Hennessy Mutual Funds are subject to a shareholder service fee, whereas assets held in Institutional Class shares of the Hennessy Mutual Funds are not subject to a shareholder service fee.

Added

Comparing the nine months ended June 30, 2025, to the nine months ended June 30, 2026, total revenue decreased by 8.1%, from $27.0 million to $24.8 million, investment advisory fees decreased by 8.2%, from $25.2 million to $23.2 million, and shareholder service fees decreased by 6.8%, from $1.8 million to $1.7 million. In the nine-month period, the decrease in investment advisory fees was due mainly to decreased average daily net assets of the Hennessy Funds in the current period, and the decrease in shareholder service fees was due to a decrease in the average daily net assets held in Investor Class shares of the Hennessy Mutual Funds in the current period. Assets held in Investor Class shares of the Hennessy Mutual Funds are subject to a shareholder service fee, whereas assets held in Institutional Class shares of the Hennessy Mutual Funds are not subject to a shareholder service fee.

Reworded

We collect investment advisory fees from each of the Hennessy Funds at differing annual rates. These annual rates range between 0.40% and 1.25% of average daily net assets. Average daily net assets of the Hennessy Funds for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, was $4.2$4.3 billion, which represents aan decreaseincrease of $0.6$0.2 billion, or 12.2%,4.0%, compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, and average daily net assets of the Hennessy Funds for the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, was $4.2 billion, which represents a decrease of $0.6$0.4 billion, or 12.9%,7.8%, compared to the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The Hennessy Fund with the largest average daily net assets for the three and sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, was the Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund, with $1.2$1.3 billion forand both$1.2 periods.billion, respectively. We collect an investment advisory fee from the Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund at an annual rate of 0.74% of average daily net assets. The Hennessy Fund with the second largest average daily assets for the three andmonths sixended June 30, 2026, was the Hennessy Gas Utility Fund, with $0.5 billion. We collect an investment advisory fee from the Hennessy Gas Utility Fund at an annual rate of 0.40% of average daily net assets. The Hennessy Fund with the second largest average daily assets for the nine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026,2026 was the Hennessy Focus Fund, with $0.5 billion for both periods.billion. We collect an investment advisory fee from the Hennessy Focus Fund at an annual rate of 0.90% of average daily net assets. However, we pay a sub‑advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.29% to the fund’s sub-advisor, which reduces the net operating profit contribution of the fund to our financial operations.

Reworded

Total assets under management as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, was $3.9$4.4 billion, aan decreaseincrease of $0.3$0.1 billion, or 7.8%,2.6%, compared to MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The decreaseincrease in total assets was attributable to market appreciation, substantially offset by net outflows from the Hennessy Funds, partly offset by market appreciation.Funds.

Added

None of the Hennessy Funds had net inflows during the nine months ended June 30, 2026.

Reworded

Redemptions as a percentage of assets under management decreased from an average of 5.5%3.6% per month during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, to an average of 2.6%1.8% per month during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026. Redemptions as a percentage of assets under management decreased from an average of 4.0%3.9% per month during the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 to an average of 2.8%2.5% per month during the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.

Reworded

Comparing the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, total operating expenses decreasedincreased by 5.2% from $5.8$5.2 million to $5.5 million. As a percentage of total revenue, total operating expenses increased 5.10.7 percentage points to 67.9%.65.3%. The dollar value decreaseincrease in operating expenses was due to decreasesincreases in the compensation and benefits, general and administrative, fundsub-advisory distributionfees, and other, and sub-advisory feesdepreciation categories, partly offset by ana increasedecrease in depreciationfund distribution and other expense.

Reworded

Comparing the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, to the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, total operating expenses decreased by 4.0%1.1% from $11.7$16.9 million to $11.2$16.7 million. As a percentage of total revenue, total operating expenses increased 6.64.8 percentage points to 68.3%.67.3%. The dollar value decrease in operating expenses was due to decreases in the compensation and benefits, fund distribution and other, and sub-advisory fees categories, partly offset by increases in general and administrative and depreciation expense categories.

Removed

Compensation and Benefits Expense: Comparing the three months ended March 31, 2025, to the three months ended March 31, 2026, compensation and benefits expense decreased by 4.2%, from $2.7 million to $2.6 million. As a percentage of total revenue, compensation and benefits expense increased 2.7 percentage points to 31.5%.

Removed

Comparing the six months ended March 31, 2025, to the six months ended March 31, 2026, compensation and benefits expense decreased by 7.4%, from $5.4 million to $5.0 million. As a percentage of total revenue, compensation and benefits expense increased 1.9 percentage points to 30.6%.

Removed

In each period, the dollar value decrease in compensation and benefit expense was due to a decrease in incentive-based compensation in the current period.

Reworded

GeneralCompensation and AdministrativeBenefits Expense: Comparing the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, generalcompensation and administrativebenefits expense decreasedincreased by 9.0%,1.9%, from $1.8$2.5 million to $1.6$2.6 million. As a percentage of total revenue, generalcompensation and administrativebenefits expense increaseddecreased 0.60.7 percentage points to 20.1%.30.4%. The dollar value decreaseincrease in generalcompensation and administrativebenefits expense was primarilydue to an increase in salaries due to decreasedhigher salesheadcount, andpartially distributionoffset expenseby a decrease in incentive-based compensation, in the current period.

Reworded

Comparing the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, to the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, generalcompensation and administrativebenefits expense increaseddecreased by 2.9%,4.5%, from $3.5$7.9 million to $3.6$7.6 million. As a percentage of total revenue, generalcompensation and administrativebenefits expense increased 3.41.2 percentage points to 21.6%.30.6%. The increasedollar value decrease in generalcompensation and administrativebenefits expense was primarily due to thea termination on January 1, 2026, of the definitive agreement signed with STF Management, LPdecrease in Marchincentive-based 2025 and the related expense of previously capitalized costscompensation in the current period.

Added

General and Administrative Expense: Comparing the three months ended June 30, 2025, to the three months ended June 30, 2026, general and administrative expense increased by 10.3%, from $1.4 million to $1.6 million. As a percentage of total revenue, general and administrative expense increased 1.1 percentage points to 18.9%. The increase in general and administrative expense was primarily due to increased business development expense in the current period.

Added

Comparing the nine months ended June 30, 2025, to the nine months ended June 30, 2026, general and administrative expense increased by 5.1%, from $4.9 million to $5.1 million. As a percentage of total revenue, general and administrative expense increased 2.5 percentage points to 20.6%. The increase in general and administrative expense was primarily due to the termination on January 1, 2026, of the definitive agreement signed with STF Management, LP in March 2025 and the related expense of previously capitalized costs in the current period.

Reworded

Comparing the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, fund distribution and other expense decreased by 7.2%,3.6%, from $0.3 million to $0.2 million. As a percentage of total revenue, fund distribution and other expense increaseddecreased 0.2 percentage points to 2.9%.

Reworded

Comparing the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, to the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, fund distribution and other expense decreased by 12.8%,9.8%, from $0.52$0.77 million to $0.45$0.69 million. As a percentage of total revenue, fund distribution and other expense increasedremained 0.1the percentagesame points toat 2.8%.

Reworded

In eachboth period,periods, the dollar value decrease in fund distribution and other expense was primarily due to decreased averageoperating dailyexpenses netrelating assets acrossto the Hennessy FundsSustainable ETF in the current period, which in turn decreases the fees we pay to financial institutions.period.

Reworded

Sub-Advisory Fees Expense: Comparing the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, sub-advisory fees expense decreasedincreased by 2.7%,8.7%, from $1.03$0.94 million to $1.00$1.02 million. As a percentage of total revenue, sub-advisory fees expense increased 1.20.5 percentage points to 12.3%.12.2%. The increase in sub-advisory fees expense was due to increased average daily net assets of the sub‑advised Hennessy Funds in the current period.

Reworded

Comparing the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, to the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, sub-advisory fees expense decreasedremained bythe 5.4%,same fromat $2.2 million to $2.0$3.1 million. As a percentage of total revenue, sub-advisory fees expense increased 1.0 percentage points to 12.4%.

Removed

In each period, the dollar value decrease in sub-advisory fees expense was due to decreased average daily net assets of the sub‑advised Hennessy Funds in the current period.

Reworded

Depreciation Expense: Comparing the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, depreciation expense increased by 24.6%4.1% from $0.07 million to $0.09$0.08 million. As a percentage of total revenue, depreciation expense increasedremained 0.4the percentagesame pointsat to 1.1%.0.9%.

Reworded

Comparing the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, to the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, depreciation expense increased by 16.9%12.3% from $0.13$0.20 million to $0.15$0.23 million. As a percentage of total revenue, depreciation expense increased 0.20.1 percentage points to 0.9%.

Added

Interest income consists of interest earned on cash and cash equivalents.

Reworded

Interest income consists of interest earned on cash and cash equivalents. Comparing the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, interest income decreased from $0.7 million to $0.6 million. Comparing the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, to the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, interest income decreased from $1.4$2.1 million to $1.3$1.9 million. In each period, the decrease in interest income resulted from decreased interest rates in the current period.

Reworded

Comparing the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, interest expense increased from $0.57 million to $0.58$0.76 million. Comparing the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, to the sixnine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, interest expense increased from $1.14$1.72 million to $1.15$1.91 million. In each period, the increase in interest expense was primarily due to the manner in which interest expense is calculated under U.S. GAAP. The issuance costs related to the 2026 Notes that have been capitalized are amortized over time and therefore increase the carrying amount of the 2026 Notes. As the carrying amountredemption of the 2026 Notes increases,on June 30, 2026, and the interestrelated expense onof unamortized issuance costs in the 2026current Notes for financial statement purposes also increases.period.

Added

Comparing the three months ended June 30, 2025, to the three months ended June 30, 2026, income tax expense remained the same at $0.8 million.

Reworded

Comparing the threenine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, to the threenine months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, income tax expense decreased by 24.4%,23.3%, from $1.0$2.9 million to $0.7$2.3 million. Comparing the six months ended March 31, 2025, to the six months ended March 31, 2026, income tax expense decreased by 29.5%, from $2.1 million to $1.5 million. In each period, theThe decrease in income tax expense was due to decreased net operating income.income in the current period.

Reworded

Comparing the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, net income decreased by 26.1%,5.8%, from $2.6$2.1 million to $1.9$2.0 million. Comparing the six months ended March 31, 2025, to the six months ended March 31, 2026, net income decreased by 29.1%, from $5.4 million to $3.8 million. In each period, theThe decrease in net income was primarily due to decreasedthe revenueredemption of the 2026 Notes on June 30, 2026, and the related expense of unamortized issuance costs in the current period.

Added

Comparing the nine months ended June 30, 2025, to the nine months ended June 30, 2026, net income decreased by 22.5%, from $7.5 million to $5.8 million. The decrease in net income was primarily due to decreased revenue in the current period.

HNNA insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 5 filings (4 insiders, 5 trade dates, 18,171 shares, about $183.6K). Net open-market shares: -18,171 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$183.6K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2026-09-30Steadman Daniel B
Executive VP, Advisory Committee Member
Gift 2,000— —35,768 SEC
2026-09-29Newton Kiera
Director
Open-market sale 504$10.02 $5.1K20,598 SEC
2026-09-24Seavey Thomas L
Director
Open-market sale 1,875$10.15 $19.0K59,754 SEC
2026-09-24Steadman Daniel B
Executive VP, Advisory Committee Member
Open-market sale 5,000$10.26 $51.3K37,768 SEC
2026-09-18Hennessy Neil J
Director, CEO, 10% owner
Grant/award 19,700— —2,080,812 SEC
2026-09-18Hennessy Neil J
Director, CEO, 10% owner
Shares withheld for tax 9,520$10.38 $98.8K2,071,291 SEC
2026-09-18Nilsen Teresa M
Director, President, COO and Secretary
Grant/award 19,700— —170,522 SEC
2026-09-18Nilsen Teresa M
Director, President, COO and Secretary
Shares withheld for tax 9,520$10.38 $98.8K161,002 SEC
2026-09-18Steadman Daniel B
Executive VP, Advisory Committee Member
Shares withheld for tax 3,206$10.38 $33.3K42,768 SEC
2026-09-18Steadman Daniel B
Executive VP, Advisory Committee Member
Grant/award 9,400— —45,974 SEC
2026-09-18Fahy Kathryn
SVP and CFO
Grant/award 12,500— —73,189 SEC
2026-09-18Fahy Kathryn
SVP and CFO
Shares withheld for tax 4,258$10.38 $44.2K68,931 SEC
2026-09-18Hansel Henry
Director
Grant/award 5,600— —225,725 SEC
2026-09-18Hennessy Brian A
Director
Grant/award 5,600— —234,664 SEC
2026-09-18Pomilia Susan Weber
Director
Grant/award 5,600— —55,487 SEC
2026-09-18Seavey Thomas L
Director
Grant/award 5,600— —61,629 SEC
2026-09-18Knight Oriordan Lydia D
Director
Grant/award 5,600— —26,900 SEC
2026-09-18Newton Kiera
Director
Grant/award 5,600— —21,102 SEC
2026-09-18Libarle Daniel G
Advisory Committee Member
Grant/award 2,800— —66,610 SEC
2026-09-16Newton Kiera
Director
Open-market sale 199$10.35 $2.1K15,502 SEC
2026-09-14Newton Kiera
Director
Open-market sale 593$10.34 $6.1K15,701 SEC
2026-05-11Fahy Kathryn
SVP and CFO
Open-market sale 10,000$10.00 $100.0K60,689 SEC

Well-known investors holding HNNA (13F)

InvestorQuarterSharesReported value% of their 13FChange vs prior quarter
Renaissance Technologies COM2026-06-3097,688$991.5K0.0%Reduced 2%
Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) COM2026-06-3012,980$131.7K0.0%Added 19%

13F reports are filed up to 45 days after quarter end and show long U.S. equity positions only; options positions are omitted here.

Coming soon: email alerts when HNNA files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.