Companies › ICHR

ICHR 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

Ichor Holdings, Ltd. · Nasdaq · Semiconductors & Related Devices · CIK 1652535 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from Ichor Holdings, Ltd.'s public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

65 / 2risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
6new risk-factor headings
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
14Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-02-20 (period ending 2025-12-26) with 10-K filed 2025-02-21 (period ending 2024-12-27).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

65new paragraphs
2removed paragraphs
13reworded paragraphs
13,589 → 16,605words in section

New heading “Our customers' adoption of artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies for semiconductor manufacturing process optimization and equipment control may create new technical requirements, interoperability challenges, and competitive risks.”

New heading “Government subsidy programs for semiconductor manufacturing may create artificial and unsustainable demand patterns for capital equipment, and subsidy conditions may create competitive distortions or impose indirect obligations on us.”

New heading “We may be classified as a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”), which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences for U.S. holders.”

New heading “U.S. export control regulations apply to "deemed exports" of controlled technology to foreign nationals, and the complexity of re-export controls across our international operations may limit our ability to hire qualified personnel and may create compliance challenges.”

New heading “Evolving environmental, social and governance disclosure requirements and stakeholder expectations may increase our compliance costs, expose us to reputational and litigation risks, and affect our ability to attract customers, investors, and employees.”

New heading “Evolving artificial intelligence regulations may restrict our use of AI technologies, impose compliance costs, create liability risks, and affect our competitiveness.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: artificial intelligence, ai, regulation
“Evolving artificial intelligence regulations may restrict our use of AI technologies, impose compliance costs, create liability risks, and affect our competitiveness.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: fine, penalt, export control, regulation
“Our failure to comply with deemed export or re-export control regulations could result in loss of export privileges, significant fines and penalties, reputational damage, and criminal liability for responsible individuals, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: export control, regulation
“U.S. export control regulations apply to "deemed exports" of controlled technology to foreign nationals, and the complexity of re-export controls across our international operations may limit our ability to hire qualified personnel and may create compliance challenges.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: fine, penalt, ai, regulation
“Violations of AI regulations could result in significant fines and penalties, prohibition on AI system deployment, requirements to withdraw products from the market, reputational damage, and potential criminal liability for responsible individuals. AI-related regulatory enforcement or compliance failures could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: litigation
“Evolving environmental, social and governance disclosure requirements and stakeholder expectations may increase our compliance costs, expose us to reputational and litigation risks, and affect our ability to attract customers, investors, and employees.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: export control, china, regulation
“This represents a structural, long-term threat to our revenue rather than merely a cyclical or regulatory compliance issue. Chinese government-backed initiatives to achieve semiconductor self-sufficiency, including substantial state subsidies for domestic equipment manufacturers and semiconductor device manufacturers, may erode our market position in China over a multi-year period even if current export control regulations are not further tightened. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (80)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 2 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

•We may be subject to interruptionsinterruptions, failures, or failurescybersecurity breaches in our information technology systems.

Added

•We may be classified as a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”), which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences for U.S. holders.

Reworded

•WeIf previouslywe identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, and the failurefail to maintain an effective system of internal controls and proceduresprocedures, it may cause investors to lose confidence in our financial reporting.

Removed

•If one or more of our counterparty financial institutions default on their obligations to us or fail, we may incur significant losses.

Removed

•There can be no assurance that we will not be a passive foreign investment company for any taxable year.

Reworded

Our business, financial condition and results of operations depend significantly on expenditures by manufacturers in the semiconductor capital equipment industry. In turn, the semiconductor capital equipment industry depends upon the current and anticipated market demand for semiconductor devices. The semiconductor device industry is subject to cyclical and volatile fluctuations in supply and demand and in the past has experienced significant downturns, including in the fourth quarter of 2022, which often occur in connection with declines in general economic conditions, and which have resulted in significant volatility in the semiconductor capital equipment industry and resulted in weakened customer demand. The semiconductor device industry has also experienced recurring periods of over-supply of products that have had a severe negative effect on the demand for capital equipment used to manufacture such products. Even as the industry recovers from periods of downturns, inventory digestion at our customers and the relative spending levels within our primary served markets, in particular lower spending levels for deposition and etch equipment, may result in decreased demand from our customers, such as in 2023 and early 2024. Our revenue exposure to specific end markets and technology nodes may amplify cyclicality, and downturns with respect to the demand for certain of our products may disproportionately impact our results even when other products are experiencing growth. We anticipate that we will continue to experience significant fluctuations in customer orders for our products and services as a result of such fluctuations and cycles, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Reworded

In addition, we must be able to appropriately align our cost structure with prevailing market conditions, effectively manage our supply chain and motivate and retain employees, particularly during periods of decreasing demand for our products. We may be forced to reduce our prices during periods of decreasing demand. During the fourththird quarter of 2022,2025, we initiated laborthe costConsolidation reductionRestructuring initiativesPlan to better align our resourcesfootprint with the decreased demand environment, which continued through the second quarter of 2024.environment. While we operate under a low fixed cost model, we may not be able to proportionally reduce all of our costs if we are required to reduce our prices. The cyclical and volatile nature of the semiconductor device industry and the absence of long-term fixed or minimum volume contracts make any effort to project a material reduction in future sales volume difficult. If we overbuild inventory in a period of decreased demand, or we expand our operations and workforce too rapidly, or procure excessive resources in anticipation of increased demand for our products, and that demand does not materialize at the pace at which we expect, or declines, our operating results may be adversely affected as a result of underutilization of capacity, charges related to excess or obsolete inventory, asset impairment or inventory write-downs, increased operating expenses or reduced margins. For example, in the fourth quarter of 2024, gross margin was impacted by costs related to our efforts to ramp headcount and other resources to address expected incremental demand in early 2025, which were unable to be fully absorbed during the quarter. Further, any future capacity expansion by us or our competitors could also lead to overcapacity and oversaturation in our target markets, which could lead to price erosion that could adversely impact our operating results.

Reworded

Continuing uncertainty regarding the global economy and geopolitical instability continues to pose challenges to our business. Geopolitical instability, including the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the conflict in the Middle East, actual and potential shifts in U.S. (including as a result of the 2024 U.S. presidential and congressional elections) and foreign trade, economic and other policies, and rising trade tensions between the U.S. and China, as well as other global events, have significantly increased macroeconomic uncertainty at a global level. The current macroeconomic environment is characterized by high inflation, supply chain challenges, shortages of skilled labor and higher labor costs, high interest rates, foreign currency exchange volatility, volatility in the global capital markets, and uncertainty in debt markets, which exacerbates negative trends in business and consumer spending and causes certain of our customers to push out, cancel or refrain from placing orders for products or services, which may reduce sales, reduce our backlog, increase our inventory and materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. While inflation has slowed from its peak in 2022 and the U.S. Federal Reserve decreased the federal funds rate in 2024,2024 and 2025, the rate continues to be elevated and there can be no assurances that the rate will continue to decrease or that it will not be increased in 20252026 or beyond. Further, difficulties in obtaining capital, uncertain market conditions or reduced profitability may also cause some customers to scale back operations, exit businesses, merge with other manufacturers, or file for bankruptcy protection and potentially cease operations, leading to customers’ reduced research and development funding or capital expenditures and, in turn, lower orders from our customers or additional slow moving or obsolete inventory or bad debt expense for us. These conditions may also similarly affect our key suppliers, which could impair their ability to deliver parts and result in delays for our products or require us to procure products from higher-cost suppliers, or if no additional suppliers exist, to reconfigure the design and manufacture of our products, and we may be unable to fulfill some customer orders. Any of these conditions or events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Reworded

We may be subject to interruptionsinterruptions, failures, or failurescybersecurity breaches in our information technology systems.

Added

We may be the target of attempted cyber-attacks, computer viruses, malicious code, phishing attacks, denial of service attacks and other information security threats. In addition, artificial intelligence technologies are increasingly being used by malicious actors to identify vulnerabilities, automate reconnaissance, generate sophisticated phishing and social engineering attacks, develop polymorphic malware that evades traditional detection methods, and implement coordinated cyber-attacks at scale and speed that exceed human-directed attacks. As AI capabilities continue to advance, the sophistication, scale, and frequency of AI-enhanced cyber-attacks are expected to increase significantly, potentially outpacing our ability to defend against such threats using conventional cybersecurity measures. Our cybersecurity defenses may require substantial ongoing investment in AI-powered security tools, threat intelligence, and skilled security personnel to address the evolving AI threat landscape.

Reworded

We may be the target of attempted cyber-attacks, computer viruses, malicious code, phishing attacks, denial of service attacks and other information security threats. In addition, to the extent artificial intelligence capabilities improve and are increasingly adopted, they may be used to identify vulnerabilities and to implement increasingly sophisticated cyber-attacks. To date, cyber-attacks have not had a material impact on our financial condition, results or business; however, our efforts to maintain the security and integrity of our information technology systems may not be effective and security breaches or disruptions could result in material financial or other losses in the future, especially if we are not able to predict the probability and the severity of these attacks. Our risk and exposure to these matters remains heightened because of, among other things, the evolving nature of these threats, the current global economic and political environment, our prominent size and scale, the outsourcing of some of our business operations to foreign jurisdictions, the ongoing shortage of qualified cyber-security professionals, and the interconnectivity and interdependence of third parties to our systems. The occurrence of a cyber-attack, breach, unauthorized access, misuse, computer virus or other malicious code or other cyber-security event could jeopardize or result in the unauthorized disclosure, gathering, monitoring, misuse, corruption, loss or destruction of confidential and other information that belongs to us, our customers, our counterparties, third-party service providers or borrowers that is processed and stored in, and transmitted through, our computer systems and networks. The occurrence of such an event could also result in damage to our software, computers or systems, or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in our, our customers’, our counterparties’ or third parties’ operations. This could result in significant losses, loss of customers and business opportunities, reputational damage, litigation, regulatory fines, penalties or intervention, reimbursement or other compensatory costs, or otherwise materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. While we have purchased cyber-security insurance, there can be no assurance that the coverage will be sufficient to cover all financial losses. Moreover, as cyber-security events increase in frequency and magnitude, we may be unable to obtain cyber-security insurance in amounts and on terms we view as appropriate for our operations.

Added

Our customers' adoption of artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies for semiconductor manufacturing process optimization and equipment control may create new technical requirements, interoperability challenges, and competitive risks.

Added

Semiconductor equipment manufacturers and semiconductor device manufacturers are increasingly adopting artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies for process optimization, predictive maintenance, equipment control, yield enhancement, and fab automation. These AI/ML capabilities may become standard customer requirements for capital equipment and subsystems, requiring real-time data integration, edge computing capabilities, sophisticated sensors and instrumentation, and software interfaces that enable AI-driven process control and optimization.

Added

If we are unable to develop and integrate AI/ML capabilities into our gas and chemical delivery subsystems at the pace required by our OEM customers and their end customers, we may be at a competitive disadvantage relative to suppliers who offer AI-enabled products. Developing AI/ML capabilities may require significant investments in software engineering, data science, sensor technologies, and computing infrastructure, and we may lack the internal expertise or resources to develop such capabilities as rapidly as the market demands. We may also face technical challenges in integrating AI/ML capabilities with our existing product architectures, or in ensuring interoperability with our OEM customers' AI platforms and industry-standard protocols.

Added

Additionally, AI-enabled equipment and subsystems may create new data privacy, data security, and intellectual property issues, as process data, recipes, and performance information may be collected, transmitted, and analyzed by AI systems, potentially creating risks of data breaches, unauthorized access to confidential information, or disputes over ownership of AI-generated insights. Customer requirements for AI capabilities may also increase product complexity, development costs, and time-to-market for new products, and may require ongoing software updates, maintenance, and support that create new service obligations and cost structures.

Added

Our failure to keep pace with customer AI adoption could result in loss of market share, reduced pricing power, or exclusion from next-generation equipment platforms, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Reworded

Our business will suffer if we are unable to attract, employ and retain highly skilled personnel as our future success depends in part on the continued service of our key executive officers, as well as our research, engineering, sales and manufacturing personnel, most of whom are not subject to employment or non-competition agreements. Competition for qualified personnel in the technology industry is particularly intense, and we operate in geographic locations in which labor markets are competitive. Our management team has significant industry experience, substantial institutional knowledge of our business and operations and deep customer relationships, and therefore would be difficult to replace. In addition, our business is dependent to a significant degree on the expertise and relationships which only a limited number of engineers possess. Many of these engineers often work at our customers’ sites and serve as an extension of our customers’ product design teams. The loss of any of our key executive officers or key engineers and other personnel, including our engineers working at our customers’ sites, or the failure to attract additional personnel as needed, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and could lead to higher labor costs, the use of less-qualified personnel and the loss of customers. We initiated labor cost reduction initiatives in the fourthsecond quarter of 2022,2025, continuing through the secondfourth quarter of 2024,2025, which may adversely affect us as a result of decreased employee morale, the loss of institutional knowledge held by departing employees and the allocation of resources to reorganize and reassign job roles and responsibilities. Furthermore, we do not maintain key person life insurance with respect to any of our employees. In addition, if any of our key executive officers or other key employees were to join a competitor or form a competing company, we could lose customers, suppliers, know-how and key personnel.

Reworded

As of December 27,26, 2024,2025, we had approximately 1,8201,891 full time employees and 560557 contract or /temporary workersemployees worldwide. None of our employees are unionized, but in various countries, local law requires our participation in works councils. While we have not experienced any material work stoppages at any of our facilities, any stoppage or slowdown could cause material interruptions in manufacturing, and we cannot ensure that alternate qualified personnel would be available on a timely basis, or at all. As a result, labor disruptions at any of our facilities could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Added

Government subsidy programs for semiconductor manufacturing may create artificial and unsustainable demand patterns for capital equipment, and subsidy conditions may create competitive distortions or impose indirect obligations on us.

Added

Governments in the United States, European Union, Japan, South Korea, China, and other countries have enacted substantial subsidy and incentive programs to encourage domestic semiconductor manufacturing capacity. These programs, including the U.S. CHIPS and Science Act, the EU Chips Act, and similar initiatives, provide grants, tax incentives, loan guarantees, and other financial support to semiconductor manufacturers who build or expand fabrication facilities in specific jurisdictions.

Added

Government subsidy programs may create demand volatility and distortions in the semiconductor capital equipment market:

Added

•Subsidized fabrication facility construction may create a near-term surge in capital equipment demand as multiple subsidized projects proceed simultaneously, followed by a sharp decline in demand once subsidy-driven projects are completed, creating boom-bust cycles that are more severe than normal industry cyclicality;

Added

•Subsidized facilities may not be economically sustainable without ongoing government support, and may operate at low utilization rates or may be curtailed if subsidies are reduced or eliminated, resulting in lower ongoing demand for spare parts, upgrades, or capacity expansions;

Added

•Government subsidy priorities may favor certain types of semiconductor manufacturing (e.g., mature node manufacturing for automotive or industrial applications versus leading-edge logic manufacturing), creating uneven demand across equipment categories and potentially reducing demand for equipment types where we have strong positions;

Added

•Subsidized competitors in foreign markets may gain market share due to government support, while we may not have access to equivalent subsidies, creating competitive disadvantages; and

Added

•Political changes or budget constraints may result in subsidy programs being reduced, delayed, or eliminated, causing sudden changes in expected demand.

Added

Additionally, semiconductor manufacturers who receive government subsidies may be subject to various conditions and restrictions that could indirectly affect us:

Added

•"Buy national" or domestic content requirements that encourage or require subsidized manufacturers to source equipment and subsystems from domestic suppliers, potentially disadvantaging us if we do not have manufacturing presence in the subsidy jurisdiction or if our products do not meet domestic content thresholds;

Added

•Restrictions on subsidized manufacturers' ability to expand manufacturing capacity in certain countries, which may limit end-market demand for equipment in regions where we have sales or manufacturing presence;

Added

•Labor, environmental, or social requirements imposed on subsidy recipients that may flow down through the supply chain to us as indirect requirements or customer expectations; and

Added

•Transparency and reporting requirements that may require subsidized customers to disclose information about their supply chains, potentially affecting our confidential commercial information or competitive position.

Added

We have limited visibility into how government subsidy programs will ultimately affect equipment demand patterns, customer behavior, or competitive dynamics. Our inability to accurately forecast subsidy-driven demand could result in capacity mismatches, inventory imbalances, or missed market opportunities. Subsidy-driven market distortions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Added

We may be classified as a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”), which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences for U.S. holders.

Added

Based on the current and anticipated valuation of our assets and the composition of our income and assets, we do not expect to be considered a PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes for the foreseeable future. However, we must make a separate determination for each taxable year as to whether we are a PFIC after the close of each taxable year and we cannot assure you that we will not be a PFIC for our 2025 taxable year or any future taxable year. Under current law, a non-U.S. corporation will be considered a PFIC for any taxable year if either (1) at least 75% of its gross income is passive income or (2) at least 50% of the value of its assets, generally based on an average of the quarterly values of the assets during a taxable year, is attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income. PFIC status depends on the composition of our assets and income and the value of our assets, including, among others, a pro rata portion of the income and assets of each subsidiary in which we own, directly or indirectly, at least 25% by value of the subsidiary's equity interests, from time to time. Because we currently hold and expect to continue to hold a substantial amount of cash or cash equivalents, and because the calculation of the value of our assets may be based in part on the value of our ordinary shares, which may fluctuate considerably given that market prices of technology companies historically often have been volatile, we may be a PFIC for any taxable year. If we were treated as a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. holder held ordinary shares, certain adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences could apply for such U.S. holder.

Reworded

As a result of recent trade policy changes in the U.S., there may be greater restrictions and economic disincentives on international trade and a resulting impact on our operations, sales and financial condition. For example, the Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS") has issued multiple rules in the last several years (the "BIS Rules"), most recently on December 2, 2024, that restrict the export of advanced computing and semiconductor manufacturing items when provided for use in certain semiconductor manufacturing activities in China, which have impacted and may continue to impact our sales and operations. We have had some delays in export activity as we analyze available emergency authorizations and assess the new licensing requirements for our business. While we have applied and received licenses from the BIS for our products, we recognize that the BIS could revise or expand the BIS Rules in response to public comments and the BIS may issue guidance clarifying the scope of the BIS Rules. Such revisions, expansions or guidance could change the impact of the BIS Rules on our business and require us to apply for additional licenses. If the BIS denies our license applications or there are delays in issuing licenses, we may have to cease or delay exports, which would cause a reduction in revenue. Furthermore, to the extent any of our customers or counterparties are designated on the Entity List or Unverified List maintained by the BIS, to which BIS may continue to add customers, we could suffer additional disruptions to sales and operations.

Added

This represents a structural, long-term threat to our revenue rather than merely a cyclical or regulatory compliance issue. Chinese government-backed initiatives to achieve semiconductor self-sufficiency, including substantial state subsidies for domestic equipment manufacturers and semiconductor device manufacturers, may erode our market position in China over a multi-year period even if current export control regulations are not further tightened. We may experience permanent loss of market share in China as Chinese customers increasingly source equipment and subsystems from domestic suppliers, and we may be unable to offset such losses with growth in other geographic markets due to limited semiconductor manufacturing capacity outside of Asia.

Added

U.S. export control regulations apply to "deemed exports" of controlled technology to foreign nationals, and the complexity of re-export controls across our international operations may limit our ability to hire qualified personnel and may create compliance challenges.

Added

U.S. export control regulations apply not only to the physical export of products and technology from the United States, but also to "deemed exports," which occur when controlled technology or source code is released to a foreign national within the United States. A foreign national is any person who is not a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident. Deemed export rules mean that providing access to controlled technical data, software, or technology to foreign national employees, contractors, or visitors in the United States may require an export license, depending on the person's nationality and the classification of the technology.

Added

Our business depends on our ability to hire and retain highly skilled engineers, many of whom may be foreign nationals, including individuals from China, Taiwan, and other countries that are subject to heightened export control scrutiny. Deemed export restrictions may limit our ability to:

Added

•Recruit and hire qualified engineering talent, particularly in competitive labor markets where foreign nationals represent a significant portion of available candidates;

Added

•Assign foreign national employees to work on projects involving controlled technologies, potentially creating inefficiencies in resource allocation and project staffing;

Added

•Provide foreign national employees with access to technical information, training, or collaborative work environments necessary for effective performance of their duties;

Added

•Utilize foreign national employees in customer-facing roles where exposure to customer proprietary information or controlled technologies may occur; and

Added

•Compete for talent against companies that are not subject to deemed export restrictions or that have more permissive licensing arrangements.

Added

Compliance with deemed export regulations requires careful tracking of employee nationalities, technology classifications, and license authorizations, and violations can result in significant civil and criminal penalties. We may be required to implement costly administrative controls, facility access restrictions, and information barriers to ensure deemed export compliance, and such measures may negatively impact operational efficiency, employee morale, and our culture of collaboration and innovation.

Added

In addition, our international operations create re-export control complexity. Products, software, and technology that are manufactured, developed, or stored outside the United States but that incorporate U.S.-origin controlled content or that are produced using U.S.-origin technology may be subject to U.S. re-export controls. This means that transfers of items or technology among our foreign subsidiaries, from our foreign subsidiaries to customers or suppliers, or within the operations of our foreign subsidiaries may require U.S. export licenses or may be subject to U.S. export restrictions, even though such transfers do not physically touch the United States.

Added

Tracking U.S.-origin controlled content across complex, multi-jurisdictional supply chains and manufacturing operations is administratively burdensome and creates risk of inadvertent violations. Re-export control requirements may limit our flexibility to optimize our global supply chain, to transfer manufacturing or engineering resources among facilities, or to respond quickly to customer requirements. Foreign governments may also object to the application of U.S. export controls to activities occurring outside U.S. territory, potentially creating conflicting legal obligations.

Added

Our failure to comply with deemed export or re-export control regulations could result in loss of export privileges, significant fines and penalties, reputational damage, and criminal liability for responsible individuals, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Reworded

We are subject to a variety of federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment or addressing climate change. These environmental laws and regulations include those relating to the use, storage, handling, discharge, emission, disposal and reporting of toxic, volatile or otherwise hazardous materials (such as regulations imposed on the use or sale of polyfluoroalkyl substances ("PFAS") or PFAS-containing products) used in our manufacturing processes. These materials may have been or could be released into the environment at properties currently or previously owned or operated by us, at other locations during the transport of materials or at properties to which we send substances for treatment or disposal. In addition, we may not be aware of all environmental laws or regulations that could subject us to liability in the U.S. or internationally. If we were to violate or become liable under environmental laws and regulations or become non-compliant with permits required at some of our facilities, we could be held financially responsible and incur substantial costs, including cleanup costs, fines and civil or criminal sanctions, third-party property damage or personal injury claims. We could also be required to alter or discontinue our product design, manufacturing and operations in certain jurisdictions and incur substantial expense in order to comply. In addition, our operations may be interrupted or restricted by the phase-out or ban of certain substances, materials or processes, which may impact the sourcing, supply and pricing of materials used in manufacturing our products.

Added

Evolving environmental, social and governance disclosure requirements and stakeholder expectations may increase our compliance costs, expose us to reputational and litigation risks, and affect our ability to attract customers, investors, and employees.

Added

We are subject to increasing requirements and expectations regarding environmental, social, and governance ("ESG") matters from regulators, investors, customers, employees, and other stakeholders. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") has proposed rules that would require public companies to provide detailed disclosures regarding climate-related risks, greenhouse gas emissions (including Scope 1, Scope 2, and in some cases Scope 3 emissions), climate-related financial impacts, and oversight and governance of climate-related risks. Although the SEC's proposed climate disclosure rules have faced legal and regulatory challenges and their final form and timing remain uncertain, we may ultimately be required to comply with such rules or with similar disclosure requirements adopted by the SEC or other regulators.

Added

In addition, international ESG disclosure frameworks are creating compliance obligations for companies operating globally. The European Union's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive ("CSRD") requires detailed sustainability reporting covering environmental, social, employee, human rights, anti-corruption, and diversity matters, with requirements that extend to non-EU companies with significant EU operations or revenue. Other jurisdictions, including the United Kingdom, Singapore, and various other countries where we operate or sell products, have adopted or are considering mandatory ESG disclosure regimes. These various frameworks are not fully harmonized, creating complexity and potential inconsistency in reporting obligations across jurisdictions.

Added

Compliance with evolving ESG disclosure requirements may require us to:

Added

•Implement new systems, processes, and internal controls to measure, track, and report ESG metrics, including greenhouse gas emissions across our operations and supply chain;

Added

•Engage third-party consultants, auditors, or verification services to validate ESG data and disclosures;

Added

•Dedicate significant management time and attention to ESG strategy, governance, and reporting;

Added

•Make costly changes to operations, supply chain, or business practices to improve ESG performance or to meet stakeholder expectations;

Added

•Disclose information that we have historically treated as confidential or that may be competitively sensitive; and

Added

•Subject our ESG disclosures to the same liability standards as financial disclosures, creating potential for securities litigation or regulatory enforcement if disclosures are deemed inaccurate or misleading.

Added

Beyond regulatory compliance, our customers, particularly large OEMs and semiconductor manufacturers, are increasingly requiring their suppliers to meet specific ESG criteria as a condition of doing business. Customer requirements may include carbon neutrality commitments, renewable energy usage targets, supply chain transparency and due diligence regarding conflict minerals and human rights, diversity and inclusion metrics, and adherence to specific ESG standards or certifications. Our failure to meet customer ESG requirements could result in disqualification from bids, loss of business, or reduced competitiveness, particularly as ESG performance becomes a more prominent factor in OEM supplier selection processes.

Showing the first 60 of 80 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

17new paragraphs
10removed paragraphs
17reworded paragraphs
4,512 → 4,803words in section

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: fine, tariff, export control, china
“While we continue to benefit from the broader growth and cyclical recovery in the semiconductor equipment industry, our operations and financial results remain subject to significant risks and uncertainties within the global trade and regulatory landscape. Specifically, the global trade environment remains complex. The outcome of ongoing negotiations between the United States and other countries regarding "reciprocal tariffs" and national security-based trade measures remains uncertain and could materially affect our material costs, product pricing, and overall demand. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: tariff, export control, sanction, china
“Industry overcapacity and a number of macroeconomic factors may contribute to a reduced spending environment, which combined with increased export controls for advanced semiconductor-related goods and services shipped to China and delayed business investment in electronic memory capacity may have varying levels of unfavorable consequences to our business. We are continually monitoring the global trade environment and any changes in tariffs, trade agreements, restrictions or sanctions that may impact us, our manufacturing facilities, or our customers. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: impairment, restructuring
“The semiconductor capital equipment industry is inherently cyclical. Overall semiconductor equipment spending in 2025 increased compared to 2024 levels, characterized by healthy demand in our primary markets of etch and deposition. During fiscal year 2025, our revenue grew 11.6% to $947.7 million, driven by sustained demand from our primary customers, including Lam Research and Applied Materials. To better align our global operations with evolving customer demand and drive operational efficiencies, we initiated a geographic footprint rationalization and restructuring plan in 2025. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: impairment, restructuring
“(1)Represents the costs associated with our Consolidation Restructuring Plan. Included in this amount for the twelve months ended December 26, 2025 are: (i) inventory impairment costs of $19.8 million; (ii) fixed asset charges of $3.1 million; (iii) severance costs associated with affected employees of $1.7 million; (iv) other direct and incremental restructuring related costs of $1.2 million; and (v) operating lease ROU asset impairment charges of $0.9 million.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: impairment, restructuring
“(1)Represents the costs associated with our Consolidation Restructuring Plan. Included in this amount for 2025 are: (i) inventory impairment costs of $19.8 million; (ii) fixed asset charges of $3.1 million; (iii) severance costs associated with affected employees of $1.7 million; (iv) other direct and incremental restructuring related costs of $1.2 million; and (v) operating lease ROU asset impairment charges of $0.9 million.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: impairment, restructuring
“(1)Represents the costs associated with our Consolidation Restructuring Plan. Included in this amount for the twelve months ended December 26, 2025 are: (i) inventory impairment costs of $19.8 million; and (ii) severance costs associated with affected employees of $0.9 million.”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (44)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 7 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

We are a leader in the design, engineering, and manufacturing of critical fluid delivery subsystems and components primarily for semiconductor capital equipment.equipment, as well as other industries such as defense/aerospace and medical. Our primary product offerings include gas and chemical delivery systems and subsystems, collectively known as fluid delivery systems and subsystems, which are key elements of the process tools used in the manufacturing of semiconductor devices. Our gas delivery subsystems deliver, monitor,monitor and control precise quantities of the specialized gases used in semiconductor manufacturing processes such as etch and deposition. Our chemical delivery systems and subsystems precisely blend and dispense the reactive liquid chemistries used in semiconductor manufacturing processes such as chemical-mechanical planarization, electroplating, and cleaning. We also provide precision-machined components, weldments, electron beam (“e‑beam”) and laser-weldedlaser welded components, precision vacuum and hydrogen brazing and surface treatment technologies, and other proprietary products for the commercial space, aerospace, defense, medical device, and general-industrial industries. This vertically integrated portion of our business is primarily focused on metal and plastic parts that are used in gas and chemical systems, respectively.products.

Reworded

Fluid delivery subsystems ensure accurate measurement and uniform delivery of specialty gases and chemicals at critical steps in the semiconductor manufacturing processes. Any malfunction or material degradation in fluid delivery reduces yields and increases the likelihood of manufacturing defects in these processes. Most original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) outsource all or a portion of the design, engineering, and manufacturing of their gas delivery subsystems to a few specialized suppliers, including us. Additionally, many OEMs are outsourcing the design, engineering, and manufacturing of their chemical delivery subsystems due to the increased fluid expertise required to manufacture these subsystems. Outsourcing these subsystems allows OEMs to leverage their suppliers’ highly specialized engineering, design, and production skills while focusing their internal resources on their own value-added processes. Outsourcing enables OEMs to reduce their costs and development time, as well as provide growth opportunities for specialized subsystems suppliers like us.

Reworded

We have a global footprint with production facilities in California, Minnesota, Oregon, Texas, Singapore, Malaysia, the United Kingdom, Korea, and Mexico.

Added

The semiconductor capital equipment industry is inherently cyclical. Overall semiconductor equipment spending in 2025 increased compared to 2024 levels, characterized by healthy demand in our primary markets of etch and deposition. During fiscal year 2025, our revenue grew 11.6% to $947.7 million, driven by sustained demand from our primary customers, including Lam Research and Applied Materials. To better align our global operations with evolving customer demand and drive operational efficiencies, we initiated a geographic footprint rationalization and restructuring plan in 2025. As part of this realignment, we began transitioning certain manufacturing activities and relocating machining assets to our expanded high-volume facilities, while concurrently consolidating our footprint through the closure of our facilities in Scotland and Korea. During fiscal year 2025, we incurred restructuring, exit, severance, and related asset impairment charges of approximately $35 million in connection with these activities.

Added

While we continue to benefit from the broader growth and cyclical recovery in the semiconductor equipment industry, our operations and financial results remain subject to significant risks and uncertainties within the global trade and regulatory landscape. Specifically, the global trade environment remains complex. The outcome of ongoing negotiations between the United States and other countries regarding "reciprocal tariffs" and national security-based trade measures remains uncertain and could materially affect our material costs, product pricing, and overall demand. To date, although we have experienced modest increases in the costs of certain materials, tariffs have not had a material adverse impact on our overall demand or cost structure. Additionally, our operations in Mexico currently benefit from exemptions under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement; however, we cannot provide any assurance that these exclusions and exemptions will remain in place indefinitely, particularly as the USMCA undergoes its scheduled joint review in July 2026. Any new, expanded, or reciprocal tariffs could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations in the future. The U.S. government also continues to expand and refine export controls and similar regulations aimed at restricting access to advanced semiconductor technology, particularly in China. These controls, which require specific export licenses for many of our customers' products, create ongoing market uncertainty, could reduce demand for our equipment, and may disrupt our global supply chain.

Removed

The semiconductor industry is cyclical in nature and is impacted by macroeconomic factors in the markets and industries in which we operate. Such factors include market trends, supply chain shortages, availability of skilled labor, geopolitical tension and retaliatory trade policies, and other factors. The industry entered a cyclical downturn in the fourth quarter of 2022 for the primary semiconductor equipment markets we serve, resulting in weakened customer demand. Although the total market for semiconductor capital equipment has experienced year-over-year stability and growth, inventory digestion at our customers and the relative spending levels within the markets we primarily serve, in particular lower spending levels for deposition and etch equipment, has resulted in continued lower demand from our customers over the past two years relative to the total semiconductor capital equipment market, despite incremental growth in demand. To help mitigate these impacts and to better align our resources and cost structure with current and expected future levels of business, we initiated labor cost reduction initiatives starting in the fourth quarter of 2022, which continued through the second quarter of 2024.

Removed

Industry overcapacity and a number of macroeconomic factors may contribute to a reduced spending environment, which combined with increased export controls for advanced semiconductor-related goods and services shipped to China and delayed business investment in electronic memory capacity may have varying levels of unfavorable consequences to our business. We are continually monitoring the global trade environment and any changes in tariffs, trade agreements, restrictions or sanctions that may impact us, our manufacturing facilities, or our customers. President Trump has issued executive orders directing the U.S. to impose new tariffs on imports from China, temporarily stayed an order imposing new tariffs on Canada and Mexico, issued the imposition of tariffs on imported steel and aluminum products, and may impose additional tariffs on these or other nations. Given our manufacturing presence in Mexico, we are currently evaluating the potential impact of potential tariffs on Mexican imports on our business.

Reworded

While challenging macroeconomic and geopolitical conditions havemay impacted and will continue to impact our business and customerspersist in the near and intermediate term, we believeremain confident in our belief that the long-term demand for semiconductors, semiconductor capital equipment, and our products will returncontinue to growth,grow, fueleddriven by thean long-term growingincreasing need for moreexpanded semiconductor productive capacity and enhancedadvanced manufacturing process technologies.

Reworded

The functional currency of our international operations is the U.S. dollar. Transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency generate foreign exchange gains and losses that are included in other expense (income),expense, net on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Substantially all of our sales contracts, and most of our agreements with third-party suppliers, provide for pricing and payment in U.S. dollars. Accordingly, these transactions are not subject to material exchange rate fluctuations.

Reworded

Income tax expense consists primarily of taxes on our taxable income related to our domestic and foreign operations, offset by the benefit of our tax holiday in Singapore, which expires in 2026. In 2024,2025, the tax benefit resulting from our Singapore tax holiday, compared to the Singapore statutory tax rate, was approximately $7.1$3.4 million. During 2024,2025, we maintained a valuation allowance against our U.S. state and federal deferred tax assets; therefore, we are not recording income tax benefits related to our U.S. GAAP losses. Income tax is also impacted by certain withholding taxes, Pillar 2 top-up taxes, stock option and restricted share unit (“RSU”) activity, and credit generation.

Reworded

The decrease in gross margin from 20232024 to 20242025 was primarily due to increased restructuring, country exit, and reduction-in-force related costs; increased supplies and tooling, employee, and occupancy costs; and unfavorable sales mix and increased factory labor and overhead costs,mix, partially offset by lower severance costs associated with our global reduction-in-force programs (+20bps) and lower excess and obsolete inventory expense (+10bps).expense.

Added

Research and development expenses remained approximately unchanged from 2024 to 2025.

Removed

The increase in research and development expenses from 2023 to 2024 was primarily due to increased material and service costs from our new product development programs of $1.9 million and increased employee-related expenses of $0.8 million, inclusive of share-based compensation expense.

Added

The increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses from 2024 to 2025 was primarily due to increased non-recurring restructuring, country exit, and reduction-in-force related costs of $9.4 million, increased employee-related costs of $2.8 million, increased legal and professional consulting costs of $1.3 million, increased outside service provider costs of $1.0 million, increased costs associated with software and IT services of $0.8 million, and increased share-based compensation of $1.7 million, partially offset by reduced transaction-related costs associated with our acquisitions pipeline of $0.8 million.

Removed

Selling, general, and administrative expense remained approximately unchanged from 2023 to 2024.

Reworded

The decrease in interest expense, net from 20232024 to 20242025 was primarily due to decreases in the weighted average amounts borrowed,borrowed partiallyand offset by an increasedecreases in our weighted average borrowing rate. The reduction in our weighted average borrowings outstanding was primarily due to paying off our revolving credit facility in the first quarter of 2024. The increasedecrease in our weighted average borrowing rate was due to higherlower applicable margin as a result of higher leverage ratios in 2024 (+29bps) and higher Bloomberg Short-Term Bank Yield ("BSBY") andaverage Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") rates (-93bps), the variable component of our borrowing rate, and lower applicable margin (-22bps), the fixed component of our borrowing rate, as a result of alower higheraverage short-termleverage borrowingratios interestin rate macroeconomic environment (+22bps).2025.

Reworded

The change in other expense, net from 20232024 to 20242025 was primarily due to currencydebt exchangeissuance rateand fluctuationsmodification duringcosts the year relatedconnected to our local currency payables ofamending our foreigncredit operations.agreement.

Reworded

The decreaseincrease in income tax expense from 20232024 to 20242025 was primarily due to recordingthe aimpact valuationof allowanceOrganization againstfor Economic Co-operation and Development ("OECD") Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules ("Pillar Two") on our U.S.Singapore federal and state deferred tax assets in the second quarter of 2023,operations, resulting in an $11.1 million charge to incomeincreased tax expense.accrual of $2.0 million. Because we have a valuation allowance recorded against our U.S. state and federal deferred income taxes, we did not record tax benefits from our U.S. taxable losses during 2024.2025.

Reworded

Management uses certain non-GAAP metrics to evaluate our operating and financial results. We believe the presentation of non-GAAP results is useful to investors for analyzing business trends and comparing performance to prior periods, along with enhancing investors’ ability to view our results from management’s perspective. All non-GAAP adjustments are presented on a gross basis. Non-GAAP gross profit, operating income, and net income (loss) are defined as: gross profit, operating income (loss), or net income (loss), respectively, excluding (1) amortization of intangible assets, share-based compensation expense, and discrete or infrequent charges and gains that are outside of normal business operations, including transaction-related costs, contract and legal settlement gains and losses, facility shutdown costs, inventory impairment charges, and severance costs associated with reduction-in-force programs, to the extent they are present in gross profit, operating income (loss), and net income (loss), respectively; and (2) with respect to non-GAAP net income (loss), the tax impacts associated with these non-GAAP adjustments, as well as non-recurring discrete tax items, including deferred tax asset valuation allowance charges. All non-GAAP adjustments are presented on a gross basis; the related income tax effects, including current and deferred income tax expense, are included in the adjustment line under the heading "Tax adjustments related to non-GAAP adjustments". Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share ("EPS") is defined as non-GAAP net income divided by weighted average diluted ordinary shares outstanding during the period. Non-GAAP gross margin and non-GAAP operating margin are defined as non-GAAP gross profit and non-GAAP operating income, respectively, divided by net sales.

Added

(1)Represents the costs associated with our Consolidation Restructuring Plan. Included in this amount for the twelve months ended December 26, 2025 are: (i) inventory impairment costs of $19.8 million; and (ii) severance costs associated with affected employees of $0.9 million.

Added

(2)Represents costs associated with the exit from our Scotland and Korea operations. Included in this amount for the twelve months ended December 26, 2025 are: (i) inventory write-off charges of $1.7 million; and (ii) severance costs associated with affected employees of $1.1 million.

Removed

(1)Represents severance costs associated with our global reduction-in-force programs.

Removed

The following table presents our unaudited non‑GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin and a reconciliation from operating income (loss), the most comparable GAAP measure, for the periods indicated:

Removed

(1)Represents transaction-related costs incurred in connection with our acquisitions pipeline.

Reworded

(23)Represents severance costs associated with our global reduction-in-force programs,programs and,(other forthan 2024,severance costs associated with the amountexit includesfrom $0.5our million of costs incurred in connection with exitingScotland and consolidatingKorea oneoperations, ofas ourdescribed U.S.-based manufacturing facilities.above).

Added

The following table presents our unaudited non‑GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin and a reconciliation from operating loss, the most comparable GAAP measure, for the periods indicated:

Added

(1)Represents the costs associated with our Consolidation Restructuring Plan. Included in this amount for the twelve months ended December 26, 2025 are: (i) inventory impairment costs of $19.8 million; (ii) fixed asset charges of $3.1 million; (iii) severance costs associated with affected employees of $1.7 million; (iv) other direct and incremental restructuring related costs of $1.2 million; and (v) operating lease ROU asset impairment charges of $0.9 million.

Added

(2)Represents costs associated with the exit from our Scotland and Korea operations. Included in this amount for the twelve months ended December 26, 2025 are: (i) severance costs associated with affected employees of $1.8 million; (ii) inventory write-off charges of $1.7 million; (iii) operating lease ROU asset impairment charges of $1.3 million; (iv) other direct and incremental facility exit-related costs of $1.3 million; and (v) accelerated depreciation charges of $0.6 million.

Added

(3)Represents severance costs associated with our global reduction-in-force programs (other than severance costs associated with the exit from our Scotland and Korea operations, as described above).

Added

(4)Represents transaction-related costs incurred in connection with our acquisitions pipeline.

Added

(1)Represents the costs associated with our Consolidation Restructuring Plan. Included in this amount for 2025 are: (i) inventory impairment costs of $19.8 million; (ii) fixed asset charges of $3.1 million; (iii) severance costs associated with affected employees of $1.7 million; (iv) other direct and incremental restructuring related costs of $1.2 million; and (v) operating lease ROU asset impairment charges of $0.9 million.

Added

(2)Represents costs associated with the exit from our Scotland and Korea operations. Included in this amount for the twelve months ended December 26, 2025 are: (i) severance costs associated with affected employees of $1.8 million; (ii) inventory write-off charges of $1.7 million; (iii) operating lease ROU asset impairment charges of $1.3 million; (iv) other direct and incremental facility exit-related costs of $1.3 million; and (v) accelerated depreciation charges of $0.6 million.

Removed

(1)Represents transaction-related costs incurred in connection with our acquisition pipeline.

Reworded

(23)Represents severance costs associated with our global reduction-in-force programs.programs Additionally,(other forthan 2024,severance costs associated with the amountexit includesfrom $0.5our million of costs incurred in connection with exitingScotland and consolidatingKorea oneoperations, ofas ourdescribed U.S.-based manufacturing facilities.above).

Added

(4)Represents transaction-related costs incurred in connection with our acquisitions pipeline.

Added

(5)In September 2025, we entered into an amended and restated credit agreement, which includes a group of financial institutions as direct lenders underlying the agreement. Under the debt modification literature codified in ASC 470, a portion of the refinance was treated as an extinguishment. Accordingly, $0.2 million of existing capitalized deferred issuance costs were written off as a loss on extinguishment of debt and $0.5 million of third-party and lender fees were expensed as incurred.

Added

(6)Adjusts GAAP income tax expense for the impact of our non-GAAP adjustments, which are presented on a gross basis.

Added

(7)During the first quarter of 2025, we recorded a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets of our Korea operations.

Removed

(3)Adjusts U.S. GAAP income tax expense for the impact of our non-GAAP adjustments, which are presented on a gross basis. During the second quarter of 2023, we recorded a valuation allowance against our U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets on a GAAP basis. In the first quarter of 2024, we determined that the valuation allowance should be recognized against our U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets on a non-GAAP basis as we were not in a three-year cumulative U.S. income position on a non-GAAP basis. Accordingly, from the first quarter of 2024 and forward, tax expense on a GAAP and non-GAAP basis reflects a valuation allowance against our U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets. Refer to footnote 6 below.

Removed

(4)During the second quarter of 2023, we recorded a valuation allowance of $11.1 million against our U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets. The valuation allowance was recorded based on an assessment of available positive and negative evidence, including an estimate of being in a three-year cumulative loss position in the U.S. by the end of 2023, projections of future taxable income, and other quantitative and qualitative information.

Reworded

We ended 20242025 with cash and cash equivalents of $108.7$98.3 million, ana increasedecrease of $28.7$10.4 million from 2023,2024, which was primarily due to netcapital proceedsexpenditures of $136.7$36.2 million from our issuance of 3.8 million ordinary shares in March 2024 in connection with an underwritten public offering and net payments on our credit facilities of $4.4 million, partially offset by cash provided by operating activities of $27.9 million, partially offset by net payments on credit facilities of $120.6 million and capital expenditures of $17.6$29.9 million.

Reworded

Our cash provided by operating activities of $27.9$29.9 million during 20242025 consisted of net non-cash charges of $46.0$73.7 million, which consisted primarily of depreciation and amortization of $30.7$33.5 millionmillion, inventory impairment of $19.8 million, and share-based compensation expense of $15.6$16.7 million, and a decrease in our net operating assets and liabilities of $2.7$9.0 million, partially offset by a net loss of $20.8$52.8 million.

Reworded

The decrease in our net operating assets and liabilities of $2.7$9.0 million during 20242025 was primarily due to ana increase in accounts payable of $29.1 million, partially offset by an increasedecrease in accounts receivable of $19.9$16.1 million and a decrease in prepaid assets of $7.9 million, partially offset by a decrease in accrued and other liabilities of $4.6$7.1 million,million and ana increasedecrease in inventoriesaccounts payable of $4.2$6.4 million.

Reworded

Cash providedused byin financing activities during 20242025 consisted of net proceeds of $136.7 million from our issues of 3.8 million ordinary shares in March 2024 in connection with an underwritten public offering and net proceeds from share-based compensation activity of $2.4 million, partially offset by net payments on our credit facilities of $120.6$4.4 million. The increasedecrease in cash provided by financing activities from 20232024 to 20242025 was primarily due to net proceeds from our issuance of shares,shares partiallyin offsetthe byprior increased net payments on our credit facilities.year.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-08-04 (period ending 2026-06-26) with 10-Q filed 2026-05-05 (period ending 2026-03-27).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

0new paragraphs
0removed paragraphs
0reworded paragraphs
95 → 95words in section

The section in the latest 10-Q reads in full:

This quarterly report should be read in conjunction with the risk factors included in our 2025 Annual Report on Form 10‑K. These risk factors do not identify all risks that we face – our operations could also be affected by factors that are not presently known to us or that we currently consider to be immaterial to our operations. Due to risks and uncertainties, known and unknown, our past financial results may not be a reliable indicator of future performance and historical trends should not be used to anticipate results or trends in future periods.

No wording changes found in this section.

Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

9new paragraphs
6removed paragraphs
18reworded paragraphs
3,542 → 4,219words in section

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Reworded topics: impairment

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

(2)Represents costs associated with the exit from our Scotland and Korea operations. Included in this amount for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 and for2026, the firstsecond quarter of 2025, the six months ended June 26, 2026, and the six months ended June 27, 2025 are: (i) other direct and incremental facility exit-related costs of $0.1 millionmillion, $0.6 million, $0.2 million, and $0.6 million, respectively; (ii) ROU asset impairment costs of $0.0 million, $1.3 million, $0.0 million, and $1.3 million, respectively; (iii) fixed asset charges of $0.0 million, $0.6 million, $0.0 million, and $0.6 million, respectively; and (iv) severance costs associated with affected employees of $0.6$0.0 million, $0.2 million, $0.0 million, and $0.8 million, respectively.
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: impairment

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

(2)Represents costs associated with the exit from our Scotland and Korea operations. Included in this amount for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 and for2026, the firstsecond quarter of 2025, the six months ended June 26, 2026, and the six months ended June 27, 2025 are: (i) other direct and incremental facility exit-related costs of $0.1 millionmillion, $0.6 million, $0.2 million, and $0.6 million, respectively; (ii) ROU asset impairment costs of $0.0 million, $1.3 million, $0.0 million, and $1.3 million, respectively; (iii) fixed asset charges of $0.0 million, $0.6 million, $0.0 million, and $0.6 million, respectively; and (iv) severance costs associated with affected employees of $0.6$0.0 million, $0.2 million, $0.0 million, and $0.8 million, respectively.
see in full comparison
New text topics: restructuring
“The increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses from the six months ended June 27, 2025 to the six months ended June 26, 2026 was primarily due to increased employee-related expenses of $1.7 million and incremental restructuring and facility exit costs of $0.8 million, partially offset by decreased fixed facility costs of $0.9 million, decreased severance costs of $0.6 million, and decreased outside service provider costs of $0.2 million.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: restructuring
“The increase in gross margin from the six months ended June 27, 2025 to the six months ended June 26, 2026 was primarily due to decreased employee expenses incurred relative revenue growth (+130 bps), severance and restructuring charges in 2025 that did not repeat in 2026 (+60 bps), and increased factory overhead cost leverage from higher volumes (+40bps), partially offset by an unfavorable sales mix (-50 bps).”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: impairment

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

(1)Represents the costs associated with our Consolidation Restructuring Plan. Included in this amount for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 and the six months ended June 26, 2026 are: (i) fixed asset charges of $1.3 million and $1.4 million respectively; (ii) ROU asset impairment costs of $0.9 million and $0.9 million, respectively; and (iii) other direct and incremental restructuring related costs of $0.4$0.5 million and fixed$0.9 assetmillion charges of $0.1 million.respectively.
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: impairment

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

(1)Represents the costs associated with our Consolidation Restructuring Plan. Included in this amount for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 and the six months ended June 26, 2026 are: (i) fixed asset charges of $1.3 million and $1.4 million respectively; (ii) ROU asset impairment costs of $0.9 million and $0.9 million, respectively; and (iii) other direct and incremental restructuring related costs of $0.4$0.5 million and fixed$0.9 assetmillion charges of $0.1 million.respectively.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (33)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

The semiconductor capital equipment industry is inherently cyclical. Overall semiconductorSemiconductor equipment spending in 2025 increased compared to 2024 levels, and this momentum has continued intoto thestrengthen first quarter ofin 2026, characterized by robust demand in our primary markets of etch and deposition. During the threesecond monthsquarter ended March 27,of 2026, our net sales increased to $256.1$294.8 million, compared to $244.5$240.3 million for the same period in the prior year.year Thisand increase$256.1 reflectsmillion sustainedfor the first quarter of 2026, reflecting higher customer demand fromin oursupport primaryof customersexpanded semiconductor manufacturing capacity and servedadvanced markets.process technologies.

Added

During the second quarter of 2026, we completed an at-the-market public offering under which we issued approximately 2.5 million ordinary shares at an average price of $80.70 per share and received net proceeds of $195.4 million. We ended the quarter with cash and cash equivalents of $256.5 million.

Reworded

To better align our global operations with evolving customer demand and drive operational efficiencies, we initiated a geographic footprint rationalization and restructuring plan in 2025. As part of this realignment, in 2025 we began transitioning certain manufacturing activities and relocating machining assets to our expanded high-volume facilities,facilities. whichWe continuedsubstantially intocompleted this plan during the firstsecond quarter of 2026.

Reworded

While macroeconomic, geopolitical, and regulatory challengesrisks maycontinue persistto in the near and intermediate term,evolve, we remain confident in our belief that long‑termlong-term demand for semiconductors, semiconductor capital equipment, and our products will continue to grow, driven by increasing requirements for expanded semiconductor manufacturing capacity and advanced process technologies.

Reworded

The increase in net sales from the firstthree quarterand ofsix months ended June 27, 2025 to the firstthree quarterand ofsix months ended June 26, 2026 was primarily due to increased customer demand stemming from increased levels of spending within the semiconductor capital equipment industry in support of expanded semiconductor manufacturing capacity and advanced process technologies.

Reworded

The increase in gross margin from the firstsecond quarter of 2025 to the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was primarily due to decreased employee expenses incurred relative to revenue growth (+130 bps), severance and restructuring charges of $1.1 million in the firstsecond quarter of 2025 that did not repeat in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 (+80 bps), and increased factory utilization.overhead cost leverage from higher volumes (+50bps).

Added

The increase in gross margin from the six months ended June 27, 2025 to the six months ended June 26, 2026 was primarily due to decreased employee expenses incurred relative revenue growth (+130 bps), severance and restructuring charges in 2025 that did not repeat in 2026 (+60 bps), and increased factory overhead cost leverage from higher volumes (+40bps), partially offset by an unfavorable sales mix (-50 bps).

Reworded

The decreaseincrease in research and development expenses from the firstsecond quarter of 2025 to the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was primarily due to athe decreaseincreased inconsumption employee-relatedof expenses,R&D partiallysupplies offsetof by$2.0 an increase in material and service costs from our new product development programs.million.

Added

The increase in research and development expenses from the six months ended June 27, 2025 to the six months ended June 26, 2026 was primarily due to increased consumption of R&D supplies of $2.1 million and increased share based compensation of $0.5 million, partially offset by decreased employee costs of $0.7 million.

Reworded

The increasedecrease in selling, general, and administrative expenses from the firstsecond quarter of 2025 to the firstsecond quarter of 2026 was primarily due to decreased fixed facility costs of $0.7 million, partially offset by increased employee-related expenses of $1.3$0.4 million and incremental restructuring and facility exit costs of $0.7 million, partially offset by decreased facility costs of $0.5 million, decreased severance costs of $0.4 million, and decreased outside service provider costs of $0.3$0.2 million.

Added

The increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses from the six months ended June 27, 2025 to the six months ended June 26, 2026 was primarily due to increased employee-related expenses of $1.7 million and incremental restructuring and facility exit costs of $0.8 million, partially offset by decreased fixed facility costs of $0.9 million, decreased severance costs of $0.6 million, and decreased outside service provider costs of $0.2 million.

Added

The decrease in amortization expense from the three and six months ended June 27, 2025 to the three and six months ended June 26, 2026 was primarily due to certain intangible assets becoming fully amortized during the second quarter of 2026.

Removed

Amortization expense remained substantially unchanged from the first quarter of 2025 to the first quarter of 2026.

Reworded

Interest expense, net, remained substantially unchanged from the firstthree quarterand ofsix months ended June 27, 2025 to the firstthree quarterand ofsix months ended June 26, 2026 due to a decrease in interest expense, from a decrease in our weighted average borrowings outstanding and a decrease in our weighted average borrowing rate, partially offset by lowera decrease in interest income.income from a lower average daily cash balance.

Reworded

The reduction in our weighted average borrowings outstanding is due to the payment of our scheduled principal payments. The decrease in our weighted average borrowing rate was due to lower Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") rates, the variable component of our borrowing rate (-74-79 bpsand -77 bps, respectively), partially offset by higher applicable margin, the fixed component of our borrowing rate, under our third quarter 2025 credit agreement (+4563 bpsand +54 bps, respectively).

Reworded

The changeincrease in other expense, net from the firstthree quarterand ofsix months ended June 27, 2025 to the firstthree quarterand ofsix months ended June 26, 2026 was primarily due to currency exchange rate fluctuations during the quarterrespective periods related to ourthe local currency payables of our foreign operations.

Reworded

The increase in income tax expense from the firstthree quarterand ofsix months ended June 27, 2025 to the firstthree quarterand ofsix months ended June 26, 2026 was primarily due to the forecasted mix of earnings in domestic and international jurisdictions, taxes on foreign income that differs from the U.S. tax rate, the ending of the Singapore tax holiday at the end of Q1the first quarter of 2026, and the impact of a valuation allowance against U.S. deferred tax assets, respectively.assets.

Reworded

Management uses certain non-GAAP metrics to evaluate our operating and financial results. We believe the presentation of non-GAAP results is useful to investors for analyzing business trends and comparing performance to prior periods, along with enhancing investors’ ability to view our results from management’s perspective. All non-GAAP adjustments are presented on a gross basis. Non-GAAP gross profit, operating income, and net income (loss) are defined as: gross profit, operating income (loss), or net income (loss), respectively, excluding (1) amortization of intangible assets, share-based compensation expense, and discrete or infrequent charges and gains that are outside of normal business operations, including transaction-related costs, contract and legal settlement gains and losses, facility shutdown costs, inventory impairment charges, and severance costs associated with reduction-in-force programs, to the extent they are present in gross profit, operating income (loss), and net income (loss), respectively; and (2) with respect to non-GAAP net income (loss), the tax impacts associated with these non-GAAP adjustments, as well as non-recurring discrete tax items, including deferred tax asset valuation allowance charges. All non-GAAP adjustments are presented on a gross basis; the related income tax effects, including current and deferred income tax expense, are included in the adjustment line under the heading "Tax adjustments related to non-GAAP adjustments". Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share ("EPS") is defined as non-GAAP net income divided by weighted average diluted ordinary shares outstanding during the period. Non-GAAP gross margin and non-GAAP operating margin are defined as non-GAAP gross profit and non-GAAP operating income, respectively, divided by net sales. Beginning in the second quarter of 2026, we revised the definition of non-GAAP financial measures to no longer exclude inventory impairment charges. Prior period non-GAAP financial measures have been recast to conform to the current definition.

Reworded

(1)Represents costs associated with the exit from our Scotland and Korea operations. Included in this amount for the firstsecond quarter of 2025 isand for the six months ended June 27, 2025 are severance costs associated with affected employees of $0.3$0.1 million.million and $0.4 million, respectively.

Reworded

(1)Represents the costs associated with our Consolidation Restructuring Plan. Included in this amount for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 and the six months ended June 26, 2026 are: (i) fixed asset charges of $1.3 million and $1.4 million respectively; (ii) ROU asset impairment costs of $0.9 million and $0.9 million, respectively; and (iii) other direct and incremental restructuring related costs of $0.4$0.5 million and fixed$0.9 assetmillion charges of $0.1 million.respectively.

Reworded

(2)Represents costs associated with the exit from our Scotland and Korea operations. Included in this amount for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 and for2026, the firstsecond quarter of 2025, the six months ended June 26, 2026, and the six months ended June 27, 2025 are: (i) other direct and incremental facility exit-related costs of $0.1 millionmillion, $0.6 million, $0.2 million, and $0.6 million, respectively; (ii) ROU asset impairment costs of $0.0 million, $1.3 million, $0.0 million, and $1.3 million, respectively; (iii) fixed asset charges of $0.0 million, $0.6 million, $0.0 million, and $0.6 million, respectively; and (iv) severance costs associated with affected employees of $0.6$0.0 million, $0.2 million, $0.0 million, and $0.8 million, respectively.

Reworded

(1)Represents the costs associated with our Consolidation Restructuring Plan. Included in this amount for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 and the six months ended June 26, 2026 are: (i) fixed asset charges of $1.3 million and $1.4 million respectively; (ii) ROU asset impairment costs of $0.9 million and $0.9 million, respectively; and (iii) other direct and incremental restructuring related costs of $0.4$0.5 million and fixed$0.9 assetmillion charges of $0.1 million.respectively.

Reworded

(2)Represents costs associated with the exit from our Scotland and Korea operations. Included in this amount for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 and for2026, the firstsecond quarter of 2025, the six months ended June 26, 2026, and the six months ended June 27, 2025 are: (i) other direct and incremental facility exit-related costs of $0.1 millionmillion, $0.6 million, $0.2 million, and $0.6 million, respectively; (ii) ROU asset impairment costs of $0.0 million, $1.3 million, $0.0 million, and $1.3 million, respectively; (iii) fixed asset charges of $0.0 million, $0.6 million, $0.0 million, and $0.6 million, respectively; and (iv) severance costs associated with affected employees of $0.6$0.0 million, $0.2 million, $0.0 million, and $0.8 million, respectively.

Added

(4)Represents the income tax effect of the adjustments used to reconcile GAAP net income (loss) to non-GAAP net income. The tax effect is calculated by determining a non-GAAP annual effective tax rate in accordance with ASC 740-270, based primarily on forecasted annual non-GAAP pre-tax income or loss by jurisdiction and the applicable statutory tax rates in those jurisdictions (including the impact of applicable tax holidays and valuation allowances which may limit or eliminate the tax effect of certain adjustments), applying that rate to non-GAAP year-to-date consolidated pre-tax income or loss, and adjusting for discrete tax items. For the three months ended June 26, 2026 and June 27, 2025, and the six months ended June 26, 2026 and June 27, 2025, on a GAAP and non-GAAP basis the United States maintains a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets and is the primary jurisdiction impacted by the non-GAAP adjustments. The tax effect of the non-GAAP adjustments is primarily driven by the forecasted mix of earnings in domestic and international jurisdictions.

Removed

(4)Adjusts GAAP income tax expense for the impact of our non-GAAP adjustments, which are presented on a gross basis.

Reworded

We ended the firstsecond quarter of 2026 with cash and cash equivalents of $89.1$256.5 million, aan decreaseincrease of $9.2$158.2 million from the prior year ended December 26, 2025. The decrease of $9.2 million for the first quarter of 2026increase was primarily due to capitalnet expendituresproceeds of $7.1$195.4 million andfrom our issuance of 2.5 million ordinary shares in June 2026 in connection with our ATM Program, partially offset by cash used in operating activities of $2.9$18.8 million and capital expenditures of $14.8 million.

Added

Cash provided by (used in) operating activities during the six months ended June 26, 2026 and June 27, 2025 was $(18.8) million and $11.5 million, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to unfavorable changes in operating assets and liabilities of $42.9 million, partially offset by increased net income of $12.5 million. The changes in working capital and earnings primarily reflect increased production and sales activity in response to robust customer demand.

Added

Cash used in investing activities during the six months ended June 26, 2026 and June 27, 2025 was $(14.8) million and $(25.8) million, respectively, and consists of capital expenditures for both periods. The decrease in cash used in investing activities from 2025 to 2026 was primarily due to reduced capital expenditures in Malaysia and Mexico, as planned capacity expansions approach completion.

Added

Cash provided by (used in) financing activities during the six months ended June 26, 2026 and June 27, 2025 was $191.8 million and $(2.1) million, respectively. The increase was primarily due to net proceeds of $195.4 million from our issuance of 2.5 million ordinary shares in June 2026 in connection with our ATM Program, partially offset by a decrease in net proceeds from share-based compensation activity of $2.1 million.

Removed

Our cash used in operating activities of $2.9 million for the first quarter of 2026 consisted of an increase in our net operating assets and liabilities of $12.7 million and a net loss of $2.5 million, partially offset by non-cash charges of $12.2 million, consisting primarily of depreciation and amortization of $7.7 million and share-based compensation expense of $3.8 million.

Removed

The increase in our net operating assets and liabilities of $12.7 million during the first quarter of 2026 was primarily due to an increase in accounts receivable of $22.6 million and an increase in inventory of $20.5 million, partially offset by an increase in accounts payable of $27.4 million, and a decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets of $2.9 million. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities from the three months ended March 28, 2025 to the three months ended March 27, 2026 was primarily due to unfavorable changes in working capital of $23.7 million and a decrease in net non-cash charges of $0.3 million, partially offset by a decrease in net loss of $2.1 million.

Removed

Cash used in investing activities during the three months ended March 27, 2026 and March 28, 2025 consisted of capital expenditures.

Removed

Cash provided by financing activities during the three months ended March 27, 2026 consisted of net proceeds from share-based compensation activity of $2.3 million, partially offset by net payments on our credit facilities of $1.6 million. The increase in cash provided by financing activities from the three months ended March 28, 2025 to the three months ended March 27, 2026 was primarily due to an increase in the net proceeds from share-based compensation activity of $0.4 million.

ICHR insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 14 filings (7 insiders, 13 trade dates, 126,187 shares, about $8.3M; 10 of these filings say the sales were made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan). Net open-market shares: -126,187 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$8.3M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2026-10-02Swyt Greg
Chief Financial Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
689$65.01 $44.8K47,143 SEC
2026-10-02Ragsdale Bruce
Chief Operating Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
2,149$65.47 $140.7K88,595 SEC
2026-10-01Ragsdale Bruce
Chief Operating Officer
Shares withheld for tax
10b5-1 plan
1,580$62.48 $98.7K90,744 SEC
2026-09-15Mackenzie Iain
Director
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
2,600$51.59 $134.1K102,427 SEC
2026-09-15Mackenzie Iain
Director
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
17,400$50.52 $879.0K105,027 SEC
2026-09-08Swyt Greg
Chief Financial Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
2,068$58.02 $120.0K47,832 SEC
2026-09-01Swyt Greg
Chief Financial Officer
Shares withheld for tax 1,081$51.76 $56.0K49,900 SEC
2026-09-01Ragsdale Bruce
Chief Operating Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
200$53.05 $10.6K92,324 SEC
2026-09-01Ragsdale Bruce
Chief Operating Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
6,456$51.74 $334.0K96,455 SEC
2026-09-01Ragsdale Bruce
Chief Operating Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
3,931$52.19 $205.2K92,524 SEC
2026-08-19Barros Philip Ryan Sr.
Director, Chief Executive Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
814$61.39 $50.0K162,062 SEC
2026-08-19Barros Philip Ryan Sr.
Director, Chief Executive Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
500$62.67 $31.3K161,562 SEC
2026-08-18Mackenzie Iain
Director
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
5,183$65.19 $337.9K127,177 SEC
2026-08-18Mackenzie Iain
Director
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
400$68.14 $27.3K122,427 SEC
2026-08-18Mackenzie Iain
Director
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
1,200$66.81 $80.2K122,827 SEC
2026-08-18Mackenzie Iain
Director
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
3,150$65.99 $207.9K124,027 SEC
2026-08-18Ragsdale Bruce
Chief Operating Officer
Shares withheld for tax 670$66.08 $44.3K102,911 SEC
2026-08-18Swyt Greg
Chief Financial Officer
Shares withheld for tax 503$66.08 $33.2K50,981 SEC
2026-08-18Barros Philip Ryan Sr.
Director, Chief Executive Officer
Shares withheld for tax
10b5-1 plan
881$66.08 $58.2K162,876 SEC
2026-08-15Ragsdale Bruce
Chief Operating Officer
Shares withheld for tax 580$71.05 $41.2K103,581 SEC
2026-08-15Swyt Greg
Chief Financial Officer
Shares withheld for tax 732$71.05 $52.0K51,484 SEC
2026-08-15Barros Philip Ryan Sr.
Director, Chief Executive Officer
Shares withheld for tax
10b5-1 plan
610$71.05 $43.3K163,757 SEC
2026-08-14Ragsdale Bruce
Chief Operating Officer
Shares withheld for tax 676$71.05 $48.0K104,161 SEC
2026-08-14Swyt Greg
Chief Financial Officer
Shares withheld for tax 854$71.05 $60.7K52,216 SEC
2026-08-14Barros Philip Ryan Sr.
Director, Chief Executive Officer
Shares withheld for tax
10b5-1 plan
711$71.05 $50.5K164,367 SEC
2026-07-01Ragsdale Bruce
Chief Operating Officer
Shares withheld for tax 1,580$111.77 $176.6K104,837 SEC
2026-06-08Swyt Greg
Chief Financial Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
6,820$66.81 $455.6K53,070 SEC
2026-06-04Barros Philip Ryan Sr.
Director, Chief Executive Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
13,705$70.19 $962.0K165,078 SEC
2026-06-04Barros Philip Ryan Sr.
Director, Chief Executive Officer
Option exercise
10b5-1 plan
1,403$21.76 $30.5K178,783 SEC
2026-06-02Black Laura A.
Director
Open-market sale 20,000$75.02 $1.5M20,462 SEC
2026-06-01Swyt Greg
Chief Financial Officer
Shares withheld for tax 1,081$70.01 $75.7K59,890 SEC
2026-05-28Swyt Greg
Chief Financial Officer
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
19,662$70.42 $1.4M60,971 SEC
2026-05-24Barros Philip Ryan Sr.
Director, Chief Executive Officer
Shares withheld for tax 1,078$68.96 $74.3K177,380 SEC
2026-05-19Titinger Jorge
Director
Open-market sale 4,000$64.21 $256.8K12,318 SEC
2026-05-18Barros Philip Ryan Sr.
Director, Chief Executive Officer
Shares withheld for tax 881— —178,458 SEC
2026-05-18Ragsdale Bruce
Chief Operating Officer
Shares withheld for tax 623— —105,711 SEC
2026-05-18Swyt Greg
Chief Financial Officer
Shares withheld for tax 503— —80,633 SEC
2026-05-15Swyt Greg
Chief Financial Officer
Shares withheld for tax 732$73.27 $53.6K73,452 SEC
2026-05-15Barros Philip Ryan Sr.
Director, Chief Executive Officer
Shares withheld for tax 610$73.27 $44.7K150,483 SEC
2026-05-15Ragsdale Bruce
Chief Operating Officer
Shares withheld for tax 539$73.27 $39.5K94,255 SEC
2026-05-14Wasserman Yuval
Director
Grant/award 2,349— —24,798 SEC
2026-05-14Titinger Jorge
Director
Grant/award 2,349— —16,318 SEC
2026-05-14Mackenzie Iain
Director
Grant/award 2,349— —132,360 SEC
2026-05-14Kispert John H
Director
Grant/award 2,349— —42,908 SEC
2026-05-14Black Laura A.
Director
Grant/award 2,349— —40,462 SEC
2026-05-14Arienzo Wendy
Director
Grant/award 2,349— —25,285 SEC
2026-05-14Ragsdale Bruce
Chief Operating Officer
Grant/award 12,079— —106,334 SEC
2026-05-14Swyt Greg
Chief Financial Officer
Grant/award 7,684— —81,136 SEC
2026-05-14Barros Philip Ryan Sr.
Director, Chief Executive Officer
Grant/award 28,856— —179,339 SEC
2026-05-14Swyt Greg
Chief Financial Officer
Shares withheld for tax 3,414$74.51 $254.4K74,184 SEC
2026-05-14Barros Philip Ryan Sr.
Director, Chief Executive Officer
Shares withheld for tax 2,843$74.51 $211.8K151,093 SEC
2026-05-14Ragsdale Bruce
Chief Operating Officer
Shares withheld for tax 1,958$74.51 $145.9K94,794 SEC
2026-05-13Haugen Marc
Director
Open-market sale 5,337$75.63 $403.6K10,825 SEC
2026-05-08Haugen Marc
Director
Open-market sale 6,000$71.96 $431.8K20,085 SEC
2026-05-08Haugen Marc
Director
Open-market sale 3,923$72.35 $283.8K16,162 SEC

Well-known investors holding ICHR (13F)

InvestorQuarterSharesReported value% of their 13FChange vs prior quarter
D. E. Shaw & Co. SHS2026-06-30652,188$73.2M0.05%Reduced 57%
Millennium Management (Israel Englander) SHS2026-06-30367,403$41.3M0.03%Reduced 56%
Renaissance Technologies SHS2026-06-30296,400$33.3M0.05%Added 1776%
AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) SHS2026-06-30180,364$20.3M0.01%Added 112%
Two Sigma Investments SHS2026-06-30110,850$12.4M0.01%Reduced 68%
Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) SHS2026-06-3037,275$4.2M0.01%Reduced 59%
Gotham Asset Management (Joel Greenblatt) SHS2026-06-3018,923$2.1M0.0%Reduced 39%
Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) SHS2026-06-3016,907$1.9M0.0%Reduced 92%

13F reports are filed up to 45 days after quarter end and show long U.S. equity positions only; options positions are omitted here.

Coming soon: email alerts when ICHR files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.