IDT 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Idt Corp. · NYSE · Telephone Communications (No Radiotelephone) · CIK 1005731 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “An increasingly significant component of our growth strategy involves the adoption, integration, and effective utilization of AI technologies across our products, services, and internal operations, which introduces significant and evolving risks.”
New heading “Retailer churn could offset new terminal sales and slow or reverse the growth of the NRS network.”
New heading “NRS depends on its payment facilitator, its sponsor bank and the payment card networks, and changes in their rules, pricing or willingness to support NRS’ merchants could materially harm NRS’ business.”
New heading “NRS relies on third-party sales channels to acquire a substantial portion of its new customers.”
New heading “NRS’ expansion into new retail verticals and new geographic markets may require significant investment and may not succeed.”
New heading “We may not realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions, including our acquisition of a controlling interest in OnCore Digital.”
New heading “Changes in U.S. immigration policy and enforcement could reduce the size of our target market and adversely affect Boss Money.”
New heading “We may be required to record impairment charges against goodwill and other intangible assets.”
New heading “We may reduce, suspend, or discontinue our dividend or our share repurchase program.”
New heading “Intellectual Property, Tax, Regulatory, and Litigation Risks”
New heading “We engage in transactions with entities affiliated with our Chairman, and we may be permitted to rely on governance accommodations available to controlled companies.”
Largest changes
“We are also subject to an expanding and sometimes inconsistent set of laws, regulations and contractual requirements governing cybersecurity and the reporting of security incidents, including U.S. …”see in full comparison
“Additionally, laws and regulations focused on the development and use of AI are proliferating globally and continue to evolve (for example, comprehensive AI frameworks in the EU and emerging federal and state guidance in the United States). Compliance may require significant documentation, transparency and record-keeping, risk assessments, model governance, content provenance or watermarking, impact assessments, vendor oversight, and restrictions on certain use cases. Noncompliance could result in investigations, fines, injunctions, remediation obligations, or other sanctions. …”see in full comparison
The inability to operate or use our networks and systems or those of our suppliers, vendors, and other service providers because of cyberattacks, even for a limited period of time, may result in significant expenses to us and/or a loss of revenue and market share. The costs associated with a major cyberattack on us could include expensive incentives offered to existing customers and business partners to retain their business, increased expenditures on cybersecurity measures and the use of alternate resources, lost revenues from business interruption, and litigation. Further, certain of our businesses, such as those offering cloud services to business customers, could be negatively affected if our ability to protect our own networks and systems is called into question because of a cyberattack. In addition, a compromise of security or a theft or other compromise of valuable information, such as financial data and sensitive or private personal information, could result in lawsuits and government claims, investigations, or proceedings. The costs of responding to a significant cybersecurity incident could also include forensic investigation, legal, notification, credit monitoring and public relations expenses, regulatory fines and penalties, and the cost of remediating vulnerabilities and restoring systems, which may not be covered, or fully covered, by insurance. Any of these occurrences could damage our reputation, adversely impact customer and investor confidence and result in a material adverse effect on our results of operation or financial condition.see in full comparison
“The use of AI also raises ethical, reputational, and legal concerns. AI-based or AI-enhanced systems can generate or amplify content that is inaccurate, misleading, biased, discriminatory, harmful, or otherwise controversial, or be misused by third parties. If our AI tools produce, or are perceived to produce, such outputs, or if we fail to implement adequate human oversight, testing, and safeguards (including data governance, evaluation, and post-deployment monitoring), our brand and competitive standing could be harmed and we could face complaints, investigations, or litigation. …”see in full comparison
“We may be required to record impairment charges against goodwill and other intangible assets.”see in full comparison
“We rely on third parties for a significant portion of our technology environment, including cloud infrastructure providers, software-as-a-service applications, collaboration and identity platforms, commercial and open-source software, managed service providers, payment processors and the security products and services we use to protect our systems. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (74)
RISK
FACTORS
An increasingly significant component of our growth strategy involves the adoption, integration, and effective utilization of AI technologies across our products, services, and internal operations, which introduces significant and evolving risks.
We currently incorporate AI into certain existing and planned products, as well as our internal operations. For example, some of our marketing, customer service and anti-fraud efforts are currently enhanced by AI. Further, our internal technology development efforts are leveraging AI in expanding ways, and other internal operational functions use AI to improve effectiveness and efficiency. Achieving consistent, secure, and compliant AI adoption across departments—including Product & Engineering, Marketing, Trust & Safety, Customer Support, Finance, and Legal/Compliance—requires ongoing investment in training, governance, and change management. Failure by any function to adopt or appropriately use these tools or failure to monitor and control the results of the adoption of the tools could reduce profitability, productivity, impair product quality, or cause compliance or security issues.
AI technologies are complex, resource-intensive, and rapidly evolving. Market demand and acceptance of AI-driven customer-facing offerings, such as net2phone AI Agent and net2phone Coach AI, remain uncertain, and our product development efforts may not achieve widespread adoption or may be outpaced by competitors. Competitors with greater financial, technical, data, or distribution resources may gain an advantage in attracting and retaining AI talent and in acquiring training data and compute capacity, which could impair our ability to maintain competitive AI capabilities. If our AI solutions, or those of others in our industry, draw controversy due to their perceived or actual societal impact—such as generating biased, harmful, or misleading content—we may experience brand or reputational harm, competitive harm, or legal liability, which could slow user adoption of our products.
The use of AI also raises ethical, reputational, and legal concerns. AI-based or AI-enhanced systems can generate or amplify content that is inaccurate, misleading, biased, discriminatory, harmful, or otherwise controversial, or be misused by third parties. If our AI tools produce, or are perceived to produce, such outputs, or if we fail to implement adequate human oversight, testing, and safeguards (including data governance, evaluation, and post-deployment monitoring), our brand and competitive standing could be harmed and we could face complaints, investigations, or litigation. Potential litigation or government regulation related to AI may increase the burden and cost of research and development, further subjecting us to reputational harm, competitive harm, or legal liability. Failure to address perceived or actual technical, legal, compliance, privacy, security, or ethical issues could undermine public confidence in AI, slowing customer adoption of our AI-driven products and services.
Laws and regulations focused on the development, use, and provision of AI technologies and other digital products and services are proliferating in many jurisdictions around the world. Staying compliant with evolving laws, regulations, and industry standards pertaining to AI may impose significant operational costs and constrain our ability to develop, deploy, or employ AI technologies profitably or at all. Failing to adapt appropriately to this evolving regulatory environment could result in legal liability, regulatory actions, monetary penalties and damage to our brand and reputation.
Operationally, AI models depend on the quality, provenance, and security of data and on reliable third-party infrastructure. Inadequate, outdated, biased, or compromised datasets can produce flawed outputs and “model drift.” Our reliance on third-party models, APIs, datasets, and cloud providers exposes us to outages, cost volatility, performance degradation, or changes in licensing or acceptable-use terms, which could disrupt our operations if these services become unavailable or are no longer offered on commercially reasonable terms.
Integrating AI introduces new cybersecurity risks, including prompt injection, data exfiltration, model poisoning, insecure or over-privileged AI agents and integrations that are granted access to our systems and data, and supply-chain vulnerabilities in third-party models and AI tooling, as well as the risk that employees inadvertently input confidential or personal data into external systems. Threat actors are also using AI to increase the speed, scale and sophistication of attacks against us and our customers, as described further under "Cyberattacks impacting our networks or systems could have an adverse effect on our business" below.
Intellectual property ownership surrounding AI technologies has not been fully addressed by U.S. or foreign courts or federal, state or foreign laws, nor by international legal frameworks. Our ongoing development and use of generative AI tools may result in copyright infringement claims, disputes over ownership and licensing, and potential patent infringement claims, among other things. These legal challenges could be costly to defend against, leading to substantial financial obligations and reputational damage. The evolving regulatory environment and uncertain legal precedents in this field further increase our exposure to litigation risks, which could materially affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Additionally, laws and regulations focused on the development and use of AI are proliferating globally and continue to evolve (for example, comprehensive AI frameworks in the EU and emerging federal and state guidance in the United States). Compliance may require significant documentation, transparency and record-keeping, risk assessments, model governance, content provenance or watermarking, impact assessments, vendor oversight, and restrictions on certain use cases. Noncompliance could result in investigations, fines, injunctions, remediation obligations, or other sanctions. Cross-border data transfer rules, sanctions, and export controls may affect access to datasets, models, or compute resources in some jurisdictions.
Further, our use of generative AI in aspects of our platforms may present risks and challenges that could increase as AI solutions become more prevalent. AI algorithms may be flawed. Datasets may be insufficient or contain biased information. These deficiencies and other failures of AI systems could have negative impacts on our users’ experience and subject us to competitive harm, regulatory action, legal liability, and brand or reputational harm. Contractual indemnities from vendors may be unavailable or insufficient. We may also face claims related to privacy (including the processing of personal or biometric information), publicity rights, deceptive practices, or content moderation failures. Defending such claims can be costly and time-consuming, could require changes to our products or processes, and could harm our reputation and financial results.
Finally, AI-related development and inference can increase energy consumption and costs, and investor or regulatory focus on sustainability may impose additional constraints. If we fail to implement robust AI governance, align employee practices with our policies, maintain sufficient human oversight, and continuously evaluate and improve our systems, the risks described above could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and reputation.
Cyberattacks,
including the use of malware, ransomware, computer viruses, denial of servicesservice attacks, credential harvesting, phishing and other social engineeringengineering, business email and
collaboration-platform compromise, impersonation of our personnel, brands or systems (including through the use of AI-generated voice, video or text, or “deepfakes”), exploitation of software vulnerabilities and misconfigurations, and other means for obtaining unauthorized access to or disrupting the operation of our networks and systems and those of our suppliers,
vendors and other service providers, could have an adverse effect on our business. Cyberattacks may cause equipment failures, loss of
information (including sensitive personal information of customers or employees or valuable technical and marketing information), or
disruptions to our or our customers’ operations. Furthermore, ransomware could potentially deny the use of our systems until a
ransom is paid. Threat actors also increasingly target our customers, retailers, agents and business partners by impersonating us, our personnel or our systems, including through third-party messaging and collaboration platforms and spoofed websites, in order to induce fraudulent payments, harvest credentials or divert funds. Such schemes can harm our customers and partners, generate customer claims and chargebacks, and damage our reputation and brands even where our own networks and systems have not been compromised, and our ability to detect and disrupt them often depends on the cooperation of third-party platform providers, financial institutions and law enforcement. Cyberattacks against companies, including us, have increased in frequency, scope, and potential harm in recent years.
The increasing availability of generative AI tools has lowered the cost and increased the scale, speed and credibility of social engineering and fraud campaigns, and threat actors, including organized criminal groups and state-sponsored or state-affiliated actors, are increasingly well-resourced and persistent. They may occur alone or in conjunction with physical attacks, especially where disruption of service is an objective of the attacker.
The development and maintenance of systems to prevent such attacks is costly and requires ongoing monitoring and updating to address
their increasing prevalence and sophistication. While, to date, we have not been subject to cyberattacks that, individually or in the
aggregate, have been material to our operations or financial condition, the preventive actions we take to reduce the risks associated
with cyberattacks, including protection of our systems and networks, may be insufficient to repel or mitigate the effects of a cyberattack
in the future.
We rely on third parties for a significant portion of our technology environment, including cloud infrastructure providers, software-as-a-service applications, collaboration and identity platforms, commercial and open-source software, managed service providers, payment processors and the security products and services we use to protect our systems. A cyberattack on, vulnerability in, misconfiguration of, or outage affecting any of these providers—including compromises of software supply chains or of the security tools on which we depend—could affect our operations, expose our or our customers’ information, or impair our ability to detect and respond to threats, even where our own networks and systems are not directly targeted. We have limited visibility into and control over the security practices of our providers, and the concentration of our infrastructure, productivity and security tooling among a small number of large providers increases the potential impact of an incident affecting any one of them. In addition, our cloud and software environments are complex and continually changing, and errors by our personnel or our providers in configuring or securing them could result in the unauthorized exposure of data. Our third-party risk management processes may not identify or prevent all such risks.
The inability to operate or use our networks and systems or those of our suppliers, vendors, and other service providers because of cyberattacks, even for a limited period of time, may result in significant expenses to us and/or a loss of revenue and market share. The costs associated with a major cyberattack on us could include expensive incentives offered to existing customers and business partners to retain their business, increased expenditures on cybersecurity measures and the use of alternate resources, lost revenues from business interruption, and litigation. Further, certain of our businesses, such as those offering cloud services to business customers, could be negatively affected if our ability to protect our own networks and systems is called into question because of a cyberattack. In addition, a compromise of security or a theft or other compromise of valuable information, such as financial data and sensitive or private personal information, could result in lawsuits and government claims, investigations, or proceedings. The costs of responding to a significant cybersecurity incident could also include forensic investigation, legal, notification, credit monitoring and public relations expenses, regulatory fines and penalties, and the cost of remediating vulnerabilities and restoring systems, which may not be covered, or fully covered, by insurance. Any of these occurrences could damage our reputation, adversely impact customer and investor confidence and result in a material adverse effect on our results of operation or financial condition.
We are also subject to an expanding and sometimes inconsistent set of laws, regulations and contractual requirements governing cybersecurity and the reporting of security incidents, including U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rules requiring disclosure of material cybersecurity incidents within four business days of a determination of materiality and annual disclosure regarding cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance; Federal Communications Commission rules requiring notification of breaches of customer proprietary network information and other customer data applicable to certain of our telecommunications and interconnected VoIP services; state data breach notification laws; requirements applicable to our money transmission and other payment services and to our handling of payment card data; and requirements in the other jurisdictions in which we operate. Assessing the materiality of an incident and satisfying these overlapping obligations on short timeframes, often while an investigation is ongoing and the facts are incomplete, is challenging and could divert management attention and resources. A failure or delay in making a required disclosure or notification, or a disclosure that is later determined to have been inaccurate or incomplete, could result in regulatory enforcement, litigation, fines and penalties and reputational harm. Public disclosure of an incident may also provide information useful to threat actors and may itself adversely affect customer and investor confidence, regardless of the ultimate impact of the incident.
Certain
of our businesses, particularly BossBOSS Money’Money, BossBOSS Revolution and IDT Digital Payments, rely in large part on immigrant communities
in the United States and elsewhere. Migration of immigrants and their spending patterns are affected by (among other factors) overall
economic conditions, the availability of job opportunities, changes in immigration laws and their enforcement, including the potential
for large scale deportations, restrictions on immigration and travel, and political or other events (such as civil unrest, war, terrorism,
natural disasters, or public health emergencies or epidemics) that would make it more difficult for workers to migrate or work outside
of the their countries of origin. Changes to these factors could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results
of operations, and cash flows.
To
be successful, we need to continue to have available, for our and our customers’ use, a high capacity, reliable and secure network.
We face the risk, as does any company, of a security breach, whether through cyberattack, malware, computer viruses, sabotage, or other
significant disruption of our IT infrastructure. As such, there is a risk of a security breach or disruption of the systems we operate,
including possible unauthorized access to our and our customers’ proprietary or classified information. We are also subject to
breaches of our respective networks resulting in unauthorized utilization of our services or products, which subject us to the costs
of providing those products or services, which are likely not recoverable. The secure maintenance and transmission of our and our customers’
information is a critical element of our operations. Our information technology and other systems that maintain and transmit customer
information, or those of service providers or business partners, may be compromised by a malicious third-party penetration of our network
security, or that of a third-party service provider or business partner, or impacted by advertentdeliberate or inadvertent actions or inactions
by our employees,employees or contractors, or those of a third-party service provider or business partner. As a result, our or our customers’ information
may be lost, disclosed, accessed, or taken without our or our customers’ consent, or our product and service may be used without
payment.
We
have developers, product development personnel, other employeesemployees, consultants and senior management in different countries, and some business activities
may be concentrated in one or more geographic areas. As a result, our ability to design, develop or sell products and services may be
affected by:
We
have attempted to control our operating expenses by operating in foreign countries such as Poland, Belarus, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Georgia,
Dominican Republic and Israel and we may in the future expand our reliance on offshore labor to other countries. Our employees in Poland,
Belarus, Georgia and Israel primarily help develop, test, and maintain certain of our technology. Our labor sourcesources in Guatemala, Costa
Rica and the Dominican Republic primarily perform certain call center, administrative, operational and customer acquisition functions.
We also have significant operations in Brazil, Uruguay, and Argentina as a result of net2phone’s growth.
Our technology and development (“T&D”) may be adversely affected by ongoing developments in Belarus and Ukraine.
Further,
our BelarussianBelarusian T&D personnel could be impacted by retaliatory actions taken by third parties related to actual or perceived Belarussian
Belarusian actions in support of the invasion, including cyberattacks.
Our primary exposure to movements in foreign currency exchange rates relates to non–U.S. dollar–denominated revenues and operating expenses. The strengthening of foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar may increase our costs denominated in those currencies, thus adversely affecting our earnings. The weakening of foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar adversely affects the U.S. dollar value of our foreign currency–denominated revenues and earnings and could lead us to raise international pricing, potentially reducing demand for our products and services. In some circumstances, for competitive or other reasons, we may decide not to raise international pricing to offset the U.S. dollar’s strengthening, which would adversely affect the U.S. dollar value of our foreign currency–denominated revenue and earnings.
Changes
to rates by our suppliers and increasing regulatory charges, tariffs or excise taxes may require us to raise prices, which could adversely
affect our financial resultresults and business.
Our
upstream carriers, suppliers and vendors may increase their prices thus directly impacting our direct cost of revenues, which would affect
our earnings. Future changes in tariffs by regulatory agencies or application of tariff requirements to currently un-tariffed products
or services could affect the price and sales of our products for a certain set of customers. Changes in our underlying direct costs of
revenues may cause us to increase the rates we charge our customers, which could make us less competitive and impact our sales and retention
of existing customers. On July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act imposed a one percent excise tax on certain remittance transfers
thattransfers, willwhich taketook effect for transfers made after December 31, 2025. The imposition of these or similar excise taxes could adversely affect
our business and financial condition.
NRS
competes in the POS market that is characterized by vigorous competition, changing technology, evolving industry standards, changing
customer needs, and frequent introductions of new products and services. We expect competition to intensify in the future as existing
and new competitors introduce new services or enhance existing services. NRS competes against many companies to attract customers, and
some of these companies have greater financial resources and substantially larger bases of customers than NRS does, which may provide
them with significant competitive advantages. These companies may devote greater resources to the development, promotion, and sale of
products and services, may achieve economies of scale due to the size of their customer bases,bases and they could and may more effectively introduce their
own innovative products and services that adversely impactsimpact NRS’ growth. If some or all of NRS’ competitors focus additional
resources on NRS’ target markets, NRS’ growth may slow, or we may lose customers due to the competition.
NRS may also face pricing pressures from competitors, which may result in the need for NRS to alter the pricing that it offers and could reduce our profitability. Responding to competition may also require NRS to increase its investment in product development, sales and marketing, or to increase the compensation it pays to its distributors and sales agents, any of which could reduce our margins.
NRS’ strategy includes increasing its revenues from brand advertising. Brands may not do business with NRS or may reduce the amounts they are willing to spend to advertise if NRS does not deliver ads, and other commercial content and marketing programs in an effective manner, or if they do not believe that their investment in advertising with NRS will generate a competitive return relative to other alternatives. NRS’ ability to increase the number of brands that use its brand advertising, and ultimately to generate advertising and marketing services revenues, depends on several factors, many of which are outside of our control. If NRS fails to increase advertising on its platform, our business could be adversely affected. NRS’ advertising revenue also depends on the effective rates, or CPMs, that it realizes for its inventory. CPMs across the digital advertising industry declined during fiscal 2026, in part because leading streaming services launched ad-supported tiers that substantially expanded the supply of digital advertising inventory, and NRS’ Advertising & Data revenue declined in fiscal 2026 as compared with fiscal 2025 as a result of those rate declines and the loss of a demand partner that ceased operations. NRS sells a substantial portion of its inventory through programmatic platforms and a limited number of demand partners, and the loss of, or a reduction in spending by, any of them could materially reduce NRS’ advertising revenue. In addition, our plans to improve NRS’ advertising results depend in part on our ability to combine our first-party transaction data with our advertising inventory and on our successful integration of OnCore Digital, and we may not realize the benefits we expect on the timetable we expect or at all.
NRS’ success will depend, in part, on its ability to develop new technologies and to adapt to technological changes and evolving industry standards. New services and technologies may be superior to, impair, or render obsolete the POS products and services that NRS currently offers or the technologies NRS currently uses to provide them. Incorporating new technologies into NRS’ POS products and services may require substantial expenditures and take considerable time, and NRS may not be successful in realizing a return on these development efforts in a timely manner or at all. NRS’ ability to develop new products and services may be inhibited by industry-wide standards, existing and future laws and regulations, resistance to change from its customers, or third parties’ intellectual property rights. If NRS is unable to provide enhancements and new features for its products and services or to develop new products and services that achieve market acceptance or that keep pace with rapid technological developments and evolving industry standards, our business would be materially and adversely affected. NRS’ recent product initiatives include premium software tiers, direct integrations with online ordering and delivery platforms, digital couponing and product data scan programs, and offerings designed for adjacent retail verticals. These initiatives require investment, including hiring in advance of commercial launch, and may not achieve the adoption, revenue or returns we expect.
Retailer churn could offset new terminal sales and slow or reverse the growth of the NRS network.
NRS’ revenue is substantially recurring and depends on the number of active terminals and payment processing accounts in its network. NRS’ retailers are small, independently owned businesses, most of which operate a single store, and they are susceptible to closure, ownership change and business disruption Churn among NRS retailers arises from a number of factors, including seasonal closures among retailers whose businesses are concentrated in the summer months or in the year-end holiday season; store closures, including closures in certain localized markets that we believe have been affected by increased immigration enforcement activity; competitive displacement; compliance reviews conducted by the payment card networks or NRS’ payment facilitator that disrupt processing for individual merchants; and technical issues affecting equipment and its interaction with third-party service providers. Churn may increase for these or other reasons, including as a result of adverse economic conditions affecting the consumers our retailers serve. If churn increases, or if NRS is unable to sustain or increase its rate of new terminal sales, the growth of the NRS network and of NRS’ recurring revenue would slow or could reverse, and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
NRS depends on its payment facilitator, its sponsor bank and the payment card networks, and changes in their rules, pricing or willingness to support NRS’ merchants could materially harm NRS’ business.
NRS operates primarily as an ISO and does not itself hold the sponsorship and settlement relationships required to process payment card transactions. NRS therefore depends on its payment facilitator, its sponsor bank and the payment card networks, and NRS and its retailers must comply with payment network operating rules and with applicable data security standards, including the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard.
The payment networks and NRS’ payment facilitator may change their rules, fees, interchange or assessment structures; may conduct compliance reviews that disrupt or terminate processing for individual merchants, as occurred with respect to certain NRS merchants during fiscal 2026; or may decline to continue supporting NRS’ merchant portfolio or particular categories of merchants that NRS serves, including merchants in higher-risk categories. NRS also acts as an intermediary in respect of chargebacks and merchant fraud losses and may incur losses that it is unable to recover from retailers. Any of these developments could increase NRS’ costs, reduce its Merchant Services revenue and margins, cause retailer attrition, or, if NRS were required to replace its payment facilitator or sponsor bank, materially disrupt NRS’ operations.
NRS relies on third-party sales channels to acquire a substantial portion of its new customers.
A significant and varying proportion of NRS’ new terminal and NRS Pay sales originates with wholesale distributors, exclusive and non-exclusive sales agents, and other resellers. These channel partners are generally not obligated to promote NRS’ offerings, may promote competing offerings, and receive commissions and residual payments that exceed the cost to NRS of originating a comparable sale in-house. An increase in the proportion of sales sourced through these channels, as occurred in certain periods of fiscal 2026, increases NRS’ selling expense and reduces the profitability of the associated revenue. The loss of one or more significant distributors or agents, a deterioration in NRS’ relationships with them, or a decision by them to favor competing offerings could reduce NRS’ new sales, increase churn, and materially and adversely affect our results of operations.
NRS’ expansion into new retail verticals and new geographic markets may require significant investment and may not succeed.
NRS’ growth strategy contemplates the gradual extension of its platform into adjacent independent retail verticals and, over time, into markets outside of the United States and Canada. Entering new verticals may require new hardware formats, new software functionality, new distribution relationships and different pricing, and retailers in those verticals may already use competing POS systems or may be served more effectively by specialized providers. International expansion would expose NRS to additional risks, including local payment infrastructure, licensing and regulatory requirements, differing data protection regimes, currency and repatriation risk, local competition, and the need to establish local sales, service and support capabilities. These initiatives require management attention and capital, may divert resources from NRS’ core markets, and may not generate the returns we expect.
We may not realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions, including our acquisition of a controlling interest in OnCore Digital.
During fiscal 2026, we acquired an 80% controlling interest in OnCore Digital, a digital media brokerage whose ad technology, demand relationships and publisher network we intend to integrate with the NRS screen network and NRS’ first-party transaction data in order to improve the monetization of NRS’ advertising inventory. Acquisitions of this type present risks, including the diversion of management attention; difficulties in integrating technology, personnel, processes and commercial relationships; the retention of key employees, demand partners and publishers; the assumption of unknown or contingent liabilities; the presence of minority interests and earn-out arrangements that may not fully align incentives; and the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets if the acquired business does not perform as expected. We may not realize the revenue, margin or strategic benefits we expect from OnCore Digital or from any future acquisition.
Changes in U.S. immigration policy and enforcement could reduce the size of our target market and adversely affect Boss Money.
A substantial majority of the customers of Boss Money, our international money transfer business, and of certain of our other consumer offerings, are first- and second-generation immigrants to the United States who send funds to family members and others in their countries of origin. The size of our addressable market, and demand for our services, is therefore closely tied to the number of foreign-born individuals residing and working in the United States and their ability to earn and transmit income.
Beginning in 2025, the U.S. federal government has significantly increased immigration enforcement activity, including removals of individuals who have resided in the United States for extended periods, and has reduced or suspended a number of lawful immigration pathways. These actions have included the termination of Temporary Protected Status designations covering nationals of numerous countries, including several of the countries to which our customers send money; the suspension or curtailment of refugee, humanitarian parole and other admissions programs; restrictions on visa processing for nationals of a large number of countries; and a marked decline in new entries at the southern border.
To the extent these or similar measures continue or expand, the population of individuals in the United States who send money abroad could contract, individuals who lose work authorization could experience reduced income and remit less, and customers who fear enforcement action may reduce their use of formal, in-person or identity-verified channels. Any of these outcomes could reduce our transaction volumes, revenues and profitability.
Immigration policy is subject to executive action, legislation and ongoing litigation, and we cannot predict the timing, scope or duration of future changes. A sustained reduction in the immigrant population of the United States, or in the ability of that population to work and send money abroad, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
net2phone
depends on several third-party providers to provide service to maintain its operations. net2phone does not have control over these providers,
and some of these providers are also its competitors. net2phone may be subject to interruptions or delays in their service and its reputation
and business may be harmed. The failure of any of these third party service providers to properly maintain services may result in negative
consequences to net2phone, including but not limited to: (i) a loss of customers, (ii) adverse impact on its reputation, (iii) negative
publicity, (iv) negative impact on its ability to acquire customers, (v) negative impact on its revenue and profitability, (vi) potential
law suitslawsuits for not reaching emergency E-911 services, and (vii) potential law suitslawsuits for loss of business and loss of reputation.
E-911
and other emergency service providers. net2phone maintains an agreement with an E-911 provider to assist it in routing and terminating
emergency calls directly to an emergency service dispatcher at the public-safety answering point, or PSAP, in the customer’s registered
location. net2phone also contractcontracts with a provider for the national call center that operates 24 hours a day, seven days a week to receive
certain emergency calls and with several companies that maintain PSAP databases for the purpose of deploying and operating E-911 services.
The dispatcher will have automatic access to the customer’s telephone number and registered location information. If a customer
moves their service to a new location, the customer’s registered location information must be updated and verified by the customer.
Until that takes place, the customer will have to verbally advise the emergency dispatcher of his or her actual location at the time
of an E-911 call. This can lead to delays in the delivery of emergency services. Interruptions in service from these vendors could also
cause failures in net2phone’s customers’ access to E-911 services and expose it to liability.
net2phone
primarily sells Polycom, Yealink and Grandstream-branded desktop devices, although,although it supports other third-party devices as well. These
desktop devices are being manufactured by vendors in China. Recent supply-chain challenges in China and global ramifications of supply-chain
difficulties, the U.S. trade war with China, including trade protection measures such as tariffs, and the effects of any new wave of
COVID-19 infections or another pandemic may cause disruptions in obtaining its desktop devices. This may increase pricing, slow delivery
times or may force net2phone to find other third-party manufacturers for its branded desktop devices.
Selling
to larger enterprise customers also contains inherent risks and uncertainties. The loss of a key customer or the failure of some to renew
or to continue to recommend net2phone’s products may have a material negative impact on its results. net2phone has a limited history
of selling its services to larger businesses and may experience challenges in configuring and providing ongoing support for the products
it sells to large customers. Larger customers’ networks are often more complex than those of smaller customers, and the configuration
of services for these customers usually requires customer assistance. There is no guarantee that the customer will make available to
net2phone the necessary personnel and other resources for a successful configuration of services. Lack of assistance from the customers
or lack of local resources may prevent net2phone from properly configuring its services for these customers, which can in turn adversely
impact the quality of services that it delivers over its customers’ networks, and/or may result in delays in the implementation
of its services and impact the quality and ability to continue to provide the services. This could also create a public perception that
net2phone is unable to deliver high qualityhigh-quality service to its customers, which could harm its reputation. In addition to the foregoing,
larger customers tend to require higher levels of customer service and individual attention, which may increase net2phone’s costs
for implementing and delivering services.
Most
of our telecommunications’telecommunications traffic is terminated through third-party providers. To support our minutes of use demand and geographic
footprint, we may need to obtain additional termination capacity or destinations. We may not be able to obtain sufficient termination
capacity from high-quality carriers to particular destinations or may have to pay significant amounts to obtain such capacity. This could
result in our not being able to support our minutes of use demands or in higher cost-per-minute to particular destinations, which could
adversely affect our revenues and profits.
Risk
Risks Related to Our Financial Condition
At
July 31, 2025,2026, we had cash, cash equivalents, debt securities, and current equity investments of $260.4$271.9 million.million (excluding restricted cash and cash equivalents). Debt securities and
equity investments carry a degree of risk, as there can be no assurance that we can redeem them at any time and that our investment managers
will be able to accurately predict the course of price movements and, in general, the securities markets have in recent years been characterized
by great volatility and unpredictability. As a result of these different market risks, our holdings of cash, cash equivalents, debt securities,
and equity investments could be materially and adversely affected.
We may be required to record impairment charges against goodwill and other intangible assets.
As a result of acquisitions completed within our NRS, BOSS Money, and net2phone businesses, our consolidated balance sheet includes goodwill and other intangible assets. We test goodwill for impairment at least annually, and we test goodwill and other long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. A sustained decline in the operating performance or projected cash flows of a reporting unit, an increase in discount rates, a sustained decline in the trading price of our Class B common stock, or adverse changes in the markets in which these businesses operate could result in a non-cash impairment charge. Any such charge could be material and would reduce our reported results of operations in the period in which it is recorded.
We may reduce, suspend, or discontinue our dividend or our share repurchase program.
In March 2024, our Board of Directors initiated a quarterly cash dividend on our Class A and Class B common stock, and it has increased that dividend twice since then, most recently in May 2026. We also maintain a share repurchase program. Our Board of Directors is under no obligation to declare dividends or to repurchase shares, and any determination to do so will depend on our results of operations, cash requirements, financial condition, capital allocation priorities, and other factors that our Board of Directors considers relevant. A reduction, suspension, or discontinuation of our dividend or of repurchases under our repurchase program, including in order to allocate capital to acquisitions or to organic investment in our growth businesses, could adversely affect the trading price of our Class B common stock.
Intellectual Property, Tax, Regulatory, and Litigation Risks
Intellectual
Property,Changes Tax, Regulatory, and Litigation Risks Changes
in national policy, governmental actions related to tariffs or international trade agreements, as well as shifts in social, political,
regulatory, and economic conditions or laws and policies governing foreign trade, manufacturing, development, and investment in the regions
where we operate, can significantly impact our business. Such changes could lead to negative sentiments towards us, potentially depressing
economic activity or restricting access to suppliers or customers and thereby have a material adverse effect on our business, results
of operations and outlook.
We
may incur costs in complying with, or face exposure from the failure to comply with, laws, regulationregulations or initiatives regarding greenhouse
gas emissions or reporting of our direct and indirect emissions.
Several
states have either passed (California) or are drafting (e.g.e.g., Washington, New York, Illinois, and Minnesota) what is being referred to
as “sustainability legislation.” This class of legislation generally requires companies generating certain levels inof annual
revenue (either globally or in the relevant state) and who have a presence in the relevant state to report data on the impact of the
company on the environment, including as to direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions or other factors believed to impact climate.
Each company that meets the requirements will be required to report the data to a state regulator and may also be required to post the
data online. Significant monetary penalties may apply to companies that fail to report in a timely manner. We believe that we will be
required to report under the California legislation, and may also be subject to other states’ legislation, if passed. We are currently
evaluating the resources necessary to comply with the law. While, barring unforeseen circumstances, we anticipate meeting the requirements
in a timely manner, there can be no assurance that we will do so.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
Largest changes
“For our annual goodwill impairment test as of May 1, 2024, we performed quantitative assessments of our Retail Communications and net2phone reporting units and qualitative assessments for our Fintech and IDT Digital Payments reporting units. Our assessments did not indicate any goodwill impairment as of May 1, 2024. For the quantitative assessments, we calculated the fair value of the reporting unit using a discounted cash flow method as a form of the income approach. The discounted cash flow method is based on the present value of projected cash flows and a terminal value. …”see in full comparison
Other Operatingsee in full comparisonExpense,Income (Expense), net.InCorporate other operating income increased in fiscal 2026 compared to fiscal 2025,weprimarilyrecordeddueantoaggregatea decrease in expenseof $4.0 millionrelated to the settlement oflitigation, oflitigationwhichassociated$1.6withmillionthewasStraightincludedPathinCommunicationsCorporateInc. class action (see Note 23—Commitments and$2.4 million was included in the NRS segment.Contingencies).
“As discussed in Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 to Part II of this Annual Report, we (as well as other defendants) were named in a class action on behalf of the stockholders of our former subsidiary Straight Path. We incurred legal fees of $0.5 million and $7.2 million in fiscal 2025 and fiscal 2024, respectively, related to this action. Also, we recorded offsetting gains from insurance claims for this matter of nil and $2.9 million in fiscal 2025 and fiscal 2024, respectively. …”see in full comparison
“The valuation allowance on our deferred income tax assets was $11.6 million and $14.9 million at July 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. In fiscal 2026, we decreased the valuation allowance by $3.3 million, due to profitability in the United Kingdom as well as restructuring of foreign operations. In fiscal 2025, we decreased the valuation allowance by $3.4 million, due to profitability in the United Kingdom, offset by $4.7 million of additions in other jurisdictions.”see in full comparison
“Other Operating Expense. In fiscal 2025, we recorded an aggregate expense of $4.0 million related to the settlement of litigation, of which $2.4 million was included in the NRS segment and $1.6 million was included in Corporate. In fiscal 2024, NRS recorded expense of $0.2 million for the cost of capitalized internal use software and certain other assets that were no longer in use.”see in full comparison
Year Ended July 31, 2026 compared to Year Ended July 31, 2025see in full comparisoncompared to Year Ended July 31, 2024 The following table sets forth certain items in our statements of income as a percentage of our total revenues:
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (101)
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements that contain the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends” and similar words and phrases. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results projected in any forward-looking statement. In addition to the factors specifically noted in the forward-looking statements, other important factors, risks and uncertainties that could result in those differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed under Item 1A to Part I “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report. The forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this Annual Report, and we assume no obligation to update the forward-looking statements, or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Investors should consult all of the information set forth in this report and the other information set forth from time to time in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including our periodic and current reports on Forms 10-Q and 8-K.
Our financial statements and accompanying notes are
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or U.S. GAAP. The preparation of
financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue,
and expenses as well as the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Critical accounting estimates are estimates made in accordance
with U.S. GAAP that involve a significant level of estimation uncertainty and have had, or are reasonably likely to have, a material
impact on our financial condition or results of operations. Our critical accounting estimates include those related to goodwill impairment
testing, valuation of long-lived assets, allowance for credit losses, and income taxes, sales taxes, and regulatory agency fees.taxes. See
Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 to Part II of this Annual Report for a complete discussion of our significant
accounting policies.
For our annual goodwill impairment testtests as of May
1, 2026 and 2025, we performed qualitative assessments for all of our reporting units that indicated that it was more likely than not that the
fair values of our reporting units exceeded their respective carrying values and, therefore, did not result in anany impairment.impairments.
For our annual goodwill impairment test as of May
1, 2024, we performed quantitative assessments of our Retail Communications and net2phone reporting units and qualitative assessments
for our Fintech and IDT Digital Payments reporting units. Our assessments did not indicate any goodwill impairment as of May 1, 2024.
For the quantitative assessments, we calculated the fair value of the reporting unit using a discounted cash flow method as a form of
the income approach. The discounted cash flow method is based on the present value of projected cash flows and a terminal value. The
terminal value represents the expected normalized future cash flows of the reporting unit beyond the projection period. We used a discount
rate based on the weighted-average cost of capital of comparable companies by Global Industry Classification Standard code that represented
our estimate of the expected return a marketplace participant would have required.
Our allowance for credit losses was $9.1$6.9 million
and $6.4$9.1 million at July 31, 20252026 and 2024,2025, respectively,respectively. The decrease was partially due to anthe increasewrite-off inof creditaged lossesnet2phone trade accounts receivable and the related to ads and data.allowance. The allowance as a percentage of gross trade accounts receivable increased
decreased to 10.2% at July 31, 2026 from 17.5% at July 31, 2025 from 13.1% at July 31, 2024 because, at July 31, 20252026 compared to July 31, 2024,2025, gross trade accounts receivable
increased 7.0%30.3% and the allowance increaseddecreased 43.2%.23.7%. The most significant increase in the trade accounts receivable balance at July 31,
2025 2026 compared to July 31, 20242025 was in NRS.NRS, due to trade accounts receivable generated by the post-acquisition operations of NRS OnCore, the entity through which the Company operates the business acquired from Oncore Digital (see Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements).
ForWe ourmaintain an allowance for credit losses on our trade accounts receivable,
we record an expensereceivable based on a forward-looking current expected credit loss model("CECL") tomodel. maintainIn ourestimating allowance forexpected credit losses.losses, Wewe consider
the probability of recoverability of accounts receivable based on pasthistorical write-off experience, consideringnet of recoveries, current collection trendstrends, the aging of accounts receivable, and general
economic factors, including bankruptcy rates. WeAllowances alsogenerally consider future economic trends to estimate expected credit losses over the lifetime
of the asset. Credit risks are assessed based on historical write-offs, net of recoveries,increase as wellreceivables asage, anand analysis of the agedspecific accounts
receivable balances with allowances generally increasing as the receivable ages. Accounts receivable may be fully reserved for when specific
known collection issues are known to exist, such as pending bankruptcies. Account balances are written off against the allowance when itrecovery is
determined to be unlikely. We have elected the practical expedient under ASU 2025-05 for our current trade accounts receivable. Under this expedient, rather than developing separate forecasts of future economic conditions, we assume in estimating expected credit losses that current conditions as of the receivablebalance sheet date will not bechange recovered.over the assets' remaining lives.
Our allowance for credit losses estimate is subject
to change due to new developments, changes in assumptions or changes in our strategy. We continually assess the likelihood of potential
amounts or ranges of recoverability and adjust our allowance accordingly; however, actual collections and write-offs of trade accounts
receivables receivable may materially differ from our estimates.
Income Taxes,Taxes and Sales Taxes, and Regulatory Agency
FeesTaxes
Our current and deferred income taxes and associated
valuation allowance,allowance and accruals for sales taxes, and telecom regulatory agency fee accruals, are impacted by events and transactions arising
in the normal course of business as well as in connection with special and non-routine items. Assessment of the appropriate amount of
income taxes,taxes and sales taxes, and regulatory agency feestaxes is dependent on several factors, including estimates of the timing and realization
of deferred income tax assets, judgments about the potential results of audits and applicability of regulatory agency rules and regulations,
as well as judgments and assumptions about changes in income tax, sales tax, and regulatory agency laws, rules, or regulations.
The valuation allowance on our deferred income tax assets was $11.6 million and $14.9 million at July 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. In fiscal 2026, we decreased the valuation allowance by $3.3 million, due to profitability in the United Kingdom as well as restructuring of foreign operations. In fiscal 2025, we decreased the valuation allowance by $3.4 million, due to profitability in the United Kingdom, offset by $4.7 million of additions in other jurisdictions.
The valuation allowance on our deferred income tax
assets was $14.9 million and $13.6 million at July 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. In fiscal 2025, we decreased the valuation allowance
by $3.4 million, due to profitability in the United Kingdom, offset by $4.7 million of additions in other jurisdictions. In fiscal 2024, we increased the valuation allowance by $3.0 million, which
included the establishment of a valuation allowance of $3.5 million for deferred income tax assets that were not more likely than not
going to be utilized prior to expiration, net of a decrease of $0.2 million due to the utilization or disposal of previously valued deferred
income tax assets and a release of $0.3 million for profitability in the United Kingdom.
Our 2017 FCC Form 499-A, which reported our calendar
year 2016 revenue, was audited by the USAC. The USAC’s final decision imposed a $2.9 million charge on us for the Federal Telecommunications
Relay Service, or TRS, Fund. We have appealed the USAC’s final decision to the FCC and we do not intend to remit payment for the
TRS Fund fees unless and until a negative decision on our appeal has been issued. We have made certain changes to our filing policies
and procedures for years that remain potentially under audit. At July 31, 2025 and 2024, our accrued expenses included $21.1 million
and $25.9 million, respectively, for FCC-related regulatory fees for the year covered by the audit, as well as prior and subsequent years.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDSTANDARDS NOT YET
ADOPTED
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06 –2025-06, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use
Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software, which simplifies the capitalization guidance
by removing all references to software development project stagesstages, so thatmaking the guidance is neutral to different software development methods.
methodologies, including Agile and other iterative approaches. The amendments in this ASU are effective for us for annual reporting periods beginning afterAugust December1, 15,2028 2027,(fiscal andyear interim reporting periods
within those annual reporting periods,2029), with early adoption permitted. The amendments in this update permit anAn entity tomay apply the new
guidanceamendments usingprospectively, retrospectively, or on a prospective,modified retrospective orbasis. modifiedBased transitionon approach.our Wepreliminary areassessment, currentlywe indo thenot processexpect ofadoption evaluatingto thehave effects
ofa thismaterial pronouncementeffect on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2024, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board, or FASB,FASB issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, No.ASU 2024-03, Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income-Expense
Income–Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40), to improve the disclosures about an entity’s expenses includingby requiring more detailed
information about the types of expenses inunderlying commonly presented expenseincome statement captions. AtThe amendments will require us to disclose, in tabular format at each interim and annual reporting period, entities
will disclose in tabular format disaggregatingdisaggregated information about prescribed expense categories underlying relevant income statement captions,
as well as the total amount of selling expense and a qualitative description of the composition of itsamounts sellingnot expense.separately Wedisclosed. will adopt theThe amendments
in thisare ASUeffective for our fiscal year beginning on August 1, 2027.2027 We(fiscal year 2028) and for interim periods beginning August 1, 2028 (fiscal year 2029), with early adoption permitted. The amendments may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively to any or all prior periods presented, and we are currently evaluating the impacttiming thatof thisadoption ASUand willthe transition method. We do not expect adoption to have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations, but expect that adoption will result in additional disclosures in the notes to our consolidated
financial statements.
FromDuring andfiscal after August 1, 2024,2026, we reclassified certain
customer fundsprepaid forexpenses pendingto moneytrade transfersaccounts receivable. Specifically, in our consolidated financial statements. In the consolidated balance sheet at July 31, 2024,
$8.92025, $2.1 million previously includedreported inwithin “Settlement"Prepaid liabilities”expenses" was reclassified to “Customer"Trade fundsaccounts deposits,”
andreceivable." inIn the consolidated statements of cash flows infor the fiscal 2024years ended July 31, 2025 and fiscal 2023,2024, cash provided by “Trade(used accountsin) payable,operating accrued
activities of $0.5 million and $(1.0) million, respectively, previously reported within "Prepaid expenses, settlement liabilities, other current liabilities,assets, and other liabilities” of $1.6 million and $2.0 million, respectively,
was reclassified to cash used in “Customer funds deposits”. These amountsassets" were reclassified to conform"Trade toaccounts the current year’s
presentation.receivable."
During fiscal 2026, we also reclassified settlement assets and disbursement prefunding in the consolidated statements of cash flows, which had previously been included within "Settlement assets, disbursement prefunding, prepaid expenses, other current assets, and other assets." In the consolidated statements of cash flows for the fiscal years ended July 31, 2025 and 2024, cash (used in) provided by operating activities of ($13.9) million and $8.2 million respectively, previously reported within "Settlement assets, disbursement prefunding, prepaid expenses, other current assets, and other assets" were reclassified to be presented as a separate line item, "Settlement assets and disbursement prefunding."
Our results of operations discussion may include the following performance metrics:
NRS usesutilizes threetwo keyperformance metrics to measure the size of its
customer base, including two that are non-GAAP measuresbase: active POS terminals and payment processing accounts. Active POS terminals are the number of POS terminals that have completed
at least one transaction in the calendar month. ItThey excludesexclude POS terminals that have not been fully installed by the end of the month.
Payment processing accounts are accounts that can generate revenue. ItThey excludesexclude accounts that have been approved but not activated. In addition to the foregoing, NRS uses
recurring revenue as a performance metric, which consist of NRS’ revenue in accordance with U.S. GAAP, excluding its revenue from POS terminal sales.
In addition to the foregoing, NRS uses recurring revenue and monthly average recurring revenue per terminal as performance metrics. NRS recurring revenue is NRS’ revenue in accordance with U.S. GAAP, excluding its revenue from POS terminal sales. Monthly average recurring revenue per terminal is recurring revenue divided by the average number of active POS terminals in the relevant period, divided further by the number of months in the relevant period. Trends and comparisons between periods for these metrics are used in the analysis of revenue, direct cost of revenue, and gross profit.
BOSS Money uses several performance metrics including transactions, average revenue per transaction, and send volume, to evaluate customer usage and revenue productivity. Transactions represent the number of remittance transfers processed during the period, average revenue per transaction is calculated by dividing BOSS Money revenue by the number of transactions, and send volume represents the aggregate amount of principal remitted by customers. Trends and comparisons between periods for these metrics are used in the analysis of revenue, direct cost of revenue, and gross profit.
net2phone’s cloudUNITE communications(UCaaS) and uContact (CCaaS) offerings
are priced on a per-seat basis, with customers paying based on the number of users in their organization. net2phone AI Agent and Coach (an AI-based contact center performance optimization tool) offerings are priced according to fixed bundles of interaction credits. net2phone’s subscription
revenue is its revenue in accordance with U.S. GAAP including its AI Agent bundled offerings but excluding sales of its equipment revenue and revenue generated by a legacy SIP trunkingTrunking offering
in Brazil. Trends and comparisons between periods for these metrics are used in the analysis of revenue, direct cost of revenue, and gross profit.
The trends and comparisons between periods for the
number of active POS terminals, payment processing accounts, seats served, recurring revenue, and subscription revenue are used in the
analysis of NRS’ or net2phone’s revenues and direct cost of revenues and are strong indications of the top-line growth and
performance of the business.
Minutes of use is a nonfinancial metric that measures
aggregate customer usage during a reporting period. Minutes of use is an important factor in BOSS Revolution’s and IDT Global’s
revenue recognition since satisfaction of our performance obligation occurs when the customer uses our service. Minutes of use trends
and comparisons between periods are used in the analysis of revenues andrevenues, direct cost of revenues.revenues, and gross profits.
Year Ended July 31, 2026 compared to Year Ended July 31, 2025 compared to Year Ended
July 31, 2024 The following table sets forth certain items in our
statements of income as a percentage of our total revenues:
The following table sets forth certain items in our statements of income as a percentage of our total revenues:
National Retail SolutionsNRS Segment
NRS, which represented 12.3%, 10.5%, 8.6%, and 6.2%8.6% of our
total revenues in fiscal 2026, fiscal 2025, and fiscal 2024, and fiscal 2023, respectively, is an operator ofoperates a nationwide POS network providingin the United States and Canada that provides independent
retailers with POS equipment, store management software, electronic payment processing, and other ancillary merchant services. NRS’
POS platform also provides marketers with digitalretail out-of-homemedia advertising and transaction data.
nm—not meaningful
Revenues. Revenues increased in fiscal 2026 compared to fiscal 2025 driven primarily by continued growth in recurring revenue, reflecting the expansion of NRS’ retailer network, increased penetration of payment processing services, improved payment processing economics, retail customers' increasing use of credit/debit cards rather than cash at NRS locations, and increased software revenue per terminal as retailers increasingly adopted premium software as a service (SaaS) features and functionalities. Net additions of POS terminals and NRS Pay accounts moderated compared to fiscal 2025, though both continued to grow at double-digit rates. Growth in recurring revenue was increasingly driven by higher revenue per terminal.
Revenues.
Revenues increased in fiscal 2025 compared to fiscal 2024 driven primarily by revenue growth from NRS’ merchant services, as well
as the expansion of NRS’ POS network.
Direct
Cost of Revenues. Direct cost of revenues increased in fiscal 20252026 compared to fiscal 20242025 driven primarily dueby to the increases
in thehigher direct costs associated with the increased scope of NRS’ merchant servicesoperations and advertising,increased partiallysales, offsetincluding byincreased acosts decreaserelated into thePOS directterminal sales and merchant services. Direct costs of NRS’
POSrevenues terminalincreased sales.at a slower rate than revenue, contributing to an increase in gross margin.
Selling,
General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expense increased in fiscal 20252026 compared to fiscal 20242025 primarily
due todriven by increases in salespersonnel-related commissions, bad debt expense, employee compensation,costs and marketingother expense.operating Theexpenses increasesupporting inNRS’ badcontinued debt expense
was related to a large programmatic advertising partner.growth. As a percentage of NRS’ revenue, NRS’ selling, general and administrative
expense was 60.3%, 60.6%, 60.7%, and 61.0%60.7% in fiscal 2026, fiscal 2025, and fiscal 2024, and fiscal 2023, respectively.
Technology
and Development. Technology and development expense increased in fiscal 20252026 compared to fiscal 20242025 primarily duedriven by general ongoing business investments to
increases develop premium software services provided through the NRS platform, to develop offerings for new markets, and in employeeother compensationdevelopment and depreciationoperations andsupporting amortizationour expense,business partially offset by a decrease in consulting expense.platforms.
Other
Operating Expense. In fiscal 2025, we recorded an aggregate expense of $4.0 million related to the settlement of litigation,
of which $2.4 million was included in the NRS segment and $1.6 million was included in Corporate. In fiscal 2024, NRS recorded expense
of $0.2 million for the cost of capitalized internal use software and certain other assets that were no longer in use.
Fintech, which represented 13.6%, 12.6%, 10.0%, and 7.0%
10.0% of our total revenues in fiscal 2025,2026, fiscal 2024,2025, and fiscal 2023,2024, respectively, is comprised of: (i) BOSS Money, a provider of international
money remittance and related value/payment transfer services; (ii) IDT Financial Services Limited, or IDT Financial Services, a Gibraltar-based bank; (iii) IDT Services Limited (“IDTS”), a Malta-based electronic money institution; and (iiiv) other, significantly smaller, financial services businesses, including
a variable interest entity (“VIE”), that processes disbursement payments, which we refer to as the Disbursement Payments VIE, (iii) IDT Financial Services Limited, or IDT Financial
Services, a Gibraltar-based bank and (iv) IDT Services Limited (“IDTS”), a Malta-based electronic money institution.VIE.
nm—not meaningful
Revenues. Revenues increased in fiscal 2026 compared to fiscal 2025 driven by higher digital transaction volumes initiated on the BOSS Money and BOSS Revolution Calling apps in addition to higher foreign currency exchange revenues to select regions, mainly Guatemala and Mexico. BOSS Money continued to benefit from cross-marketing to BOSS Revolution and IDT Digital Payments retail customers.
Direct Cost of Revenues. Direct cost of revenues increased in fiscal 2026 compared to fiscal 2025 primarily due to increases in BOSS Money’s direct cost of revenues, consistent with the growth in BOSS Money revenue. As transaction volumes increase, associated payout and processing fees also increase, partially offset by us reducing the transaction fee that we pay to our money transfer payors. Direct cost of revenues increased at a slower rate than revenue, reflecting continued growth in the higher-margin digital channel relative to the retail channel, contributing to an increase in gross margin.
Revenues.
Revenues increased in fiscal 2025 compared to fiscal 2024 primarily because of increased transaction volume at BOSS Money, which included
increases in both its digital and retail channel transactions.
Direct
Cost of Revenues. Direct cost of revenues increased in fiscal 2025 compared to fiscal 2024 primarily due to an increase in
BOSS Money’s direct cost of revenues, which reflected the increase in BOSS Money’s revenue.
Selling,
General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expense increased in fiscal 20252026 compared to fiscal 20242025 primarily
due to increases inhigher debit and credit card processing charges, employee compensation, bank fees, and marketing expenses. The increase
in card processing charges was the result of increased credit and debit card transactions through our BOSS Money appchargebacks, and other operating costs associated with growth in BOSS Money’s digital
channels. transaction activity. As a percentage of Fintech’s revenue, Fintech’s selling, general and administrative expense was 44.3%, 42.8%, 49.4%,and and
54.5%49.4% in fiscal 2026, fiscal 2025, and fiscal 2024, and fiscal 2023, respectively.
Technology
and Development. Technology and development expense decreasedincreased in fiscal 20252026 compared to fiscal 20242025 primarily due to
a decreaseincreases in employee compensationcompensation, expense,including non-cash compensation, and other development-related costs, partially offset by increases inlower depreciation and amortization expense, software license
and maintenance expense, and cloud services expense.
Other
Operating Gain, net. In fiscal 2024, we determined that the requirements for contingent consideration payments related
to the Leaf Global Fintech Corporation, or Leaf, acquisition would not be met. We recognized a gain of $1.8 million on the write-off
of these contingent consideration payment obligations. In addition, in fiscal 2024, we completed a portion of the integration of the
Leaf Wallet platform into the BOSS Money app, including replacing the Leaf tradename with BOSS Money. The Leaf tradename balance of $0.1
million was written off in fiscal 2024.
The net2phone segment, which represented 7.4%, 7.1%, 6.8%,
and 5.8%6.8% of our total revenues in fiscal 2025,2026, fiscal 2024,2025, and fiscal 2023,2024, respectively, is comprised of net2phone’s integrated
cloud communications and contactworkflow centersolutions services.including UCaaS, CCaaS, net2phone AI Agent and Coach solutions.
nm—not meaningful
Revenues. net2phone’s revenues increased in fiscal 2026 compared to fiscal 2025 primarily due to increased UCaaS and CCaaS services revenue, primarily reflecting an increase in seats served during the respective periods. The increase was augmented by the impact of the increase in relatively higher revenue per seat CCaaS seats served, by the positive foreign currency impact of strengthening local currencies versus the U.S. dollar in certain Latin American markets, and by the introduction of agentic AI offerings in fiscal 2026.
Revenues.
net2phone’s revenues increased in fiscal 2025 compared to fiscal 2024 due to the growth in subscription revenue, most significantly
in the U.S. market, and from its contact center services’ revenue, which reflected the increase in seats served at July 31, 2025
compared to July 31, 2024.
Direct
Cost of Revenues. Direct cost of revenues increased in fiscal 20252026 compared to fiscal 20242025 primarily due to the increasecosts in
revenues,incurred withserving the largestexpanded increasenumber inof seats served. Direct costs increased at a slower rate than revenue, reflecting the U.S.relatively market. net2phone’s revenuerapid growth exceeded the increase in direct cost of revenues.higher-margin CCaaS seats compared to UCaaS.
Selling,
General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expense slightly decreasedincreased in fiscal 20252026 compared to fiscal
2024 2025 primarily due to decreasesincreases in marketing, bad debt,compensation and consultingsales expenses,commissions, partiallyas offsetwell byas increases in sales commissions and
depreciationmarketing and amortizationconsulting expenses. As a percentage of net2phone’s revenues, net2phone’s selling, general and administrative
expense decreased to 59.6%58.2% from 63.9%59.6% and 68.7%63.9% in fiscal 2026, fiscal 2025, and fiscal 2024, and fiscal 2023, respectively.
Technology
and Development. Technology and development expense increased in fiscal 20252026 compared to fiscal 20242025 primarily due to increases
in employee compensation, software license and maintenance, cloud services, and depreciation and amortization expenses.
Other
Operating (Expense) Gain, net. In fiscal 2025 and fiscal 2023, we recorded expense of $0.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively,
for telephone equipment used in operations that was taken out of service. In fiscal 2024, we determined that the requirement for a contingent
consideration payment related to an acquisition in a prior period would not be met. We recognized a gain of $0.1 million on the write-off
of this contingent consideration payment obligation.
The Traditional Communications segment, which represented
66.7%, 69.8%, 74.6%, and 81.0%74.6% of our total revenues in fiscal 2025,2026, fiscal 2024,2025, and fiscal 2023,2024, respectively, includes: (i) IDT Digital Payments,
which enables customers to transfer airtime and bundles of airtime, messaging, and data to international and domestic mobile accounts;
(ii) IDT Global, a wholesale provider of international voice and SMS termination and outsourced traffic management solutions to telecoms worldwide; and (iii) BOSS Revolution, an international long-distance calling service marketed primarily to immigrant communities in the United States
and Canada; and (iii) IDT Global, a wholesale provider of international voice and SMS termination and outsourced traffic management
solutions to telecoms worldwide.Canada. Traditional Communications also includes other small businesses and offerings including early-stage
business initiatives and mature businesses in harvest mode.
Traditional Communications’ most significant
revenue streams are from IDT Digital Payments, BOSS Revolution, and IDT Global. IDT Digital Payments and BOSS Revolution are sold directly
to consumers and through the BOSS Money and BOSS Revolution apps as well as through distributors and retailers. We receive payments for BOSS Revolution and IDT Digital Payments prior to providing
the services. We recognize the revenue when services are provided to the customer. Traditional Communications’ revenues tend to
be somewhat seasonal, with the second fiscal quarter (which contains Christmas and New Year’s Day) and the fourth fiscal quarter
(which contains Mother’s Day and Father’s Day) typically showing higher minute volumes. IDT Global's revenue is generally recognized as minutes are terminated and for SMS when messages are transmitted, in accordance with wholesale carrier agreements. Customers are typically invoiced in arrears and settle balances on a periodic basis following the completion of services.
Revenues. Revenues for the Traditional Communications segment increased in fiscal 2026 compared to fiscal 2025 primarily due to higher revenues from IDT Global and IDT Digital Payments, which more than offset the decline in BOSS Revolution revenues. IDT Global revenues increased primarily due to higher international long-distance traffic volumes and improved product mix, while IDT Digital Payments revenues increased due to higher transaction volumes and continued growth in digital payment channels. The decline in BOSS Revolution revenues reflected industry-wide trends, including the proliferation of unlimited calling plans and free over-the-top voice and messaging services, which have reduced demand for prepaid international calling plans.
Direct Cost of Revenues. Direct cost of revenues increased in fiscal 2026 compared to fiscal 2025 reflecting higher minutes of use for IDT Global and associated network and carrier costs, as well as higher direct cost of revenues associated with IDT Digital Payments reflecting increased transaction volumes, partially offset by lower minutes of use and associated network and settlement costs in BOSS Revolution, and the ongoing rotation within IDT Digital Payments from its lower margin retail channel to higher margin digital consumer offerings.
Revenues.
Revenues from IDT Digital Payments increased in fiscal 2025 compared to fiscal 2024 primarily due to increases in revenues from the direct-to-consumer
and enterprise and wholesale channels, partially offset by a decrease in revenues from the retail channel.
Revenues and minutes of use from BOSS Revolution
decreased in fiscal 2025 compared to fiscal 2024. BOSS Revolution continues to be impacted by persistent, market-wide trends, including
the proliferation of unlimited calling plans offered by wireless carriers and mobile virtual network operators, and the increasing penetration
of free and paid over-the-top voice, video conferencing, and messaging services.
Revenues from IDT Global increased in fiscal 2025
compared to fiscal 2024, although IDT Global’s minutes of use decreased in fiscal 2025 compared to fiscal 2024. IDT Global mitigated
the impacts of the ongoing industry-wide declines in paid-minute voice through a traffic mix shift to higher margin routes and new service
offerings. However, we expect IDT Global to continue to be adversely impacted by this industry-wide trend, and minutes of use and revenues
will likely continue to decline from quarter-to-quarter, as we seek to maximize economics rather than necessarily sustain minutes of
use or revenues.
Direct
Cost of Revenues. Direct cost of revenues decreased in fiscal 2025 compared to fiscal 2024 primarily due to the decreases
in BOSS Revolution’s minutes of use and direct cost of revenues.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
No wording changes found in this section.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
Largest changes
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expense increased in the three andsee in full comparisonsixnine months endedJanuaryApril31,30, 2026 from the comparative prior-year periods. Thesemodestincreases primarily reflected higher debit and credit card processing charges, chargebacks, and other operating costs associated with growth in BOSS Money’sapp anddigital transaction activity. As a percentage of Fintech’s revenue, Fintech’s selling, general and administrative expenseremainedincreasedflattoat44.8%44.2%fromfor41.5%bothin the three months endedJanuary 31,April 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and decreased to41.6%42.7% from43.8%43.0% in thesixnine months endedJanuaryApril31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.The decrease reflects, in part, the efficiencies derived from BOSS Money’s ongoing integration of AI and machine learning in its workflows to enhance customer service and to prevent potential chargebacks, among other priorities.
net2phone’s UNITE (UCaaS), and uContact (CCaaSsee in full comparison) and Coach (a contact center performance optimization tool) offerings are priced on a per-seat basis, with customers paying based on the number of users in their organization. net2phone AIisAgent and Coach (an AI-based contact center performance optimization tool) offerings are priced according to fixed bundles of interactioncredits, a usage-based criterion.credits. net2phone’s subscription revenue is its revenue in accordance with U.S. GAAP including its AI Agent bundle offering but excluding its equipment revenue and revenue generated by a legacy SIP trunking offering in Brazil. Trends and comparisons between periods for these metrics are used in the analysis of revenue, direct cost of revenue, and gross profit.
The net2phone segment, which represented 7.7% and 7.3% of our total revenues in the three months ended April 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and 7.5% and 7.1% of our total revenues in thesee in full comparisonthreenine months endedJanuaryApril31, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and 7.4% and 7.0% of our total revenues in the six months ended January 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, is comprised of net2phone’s communications and workflow solutions including its UCaaS,CCaas,CCaaS, net2phoneAI,AI Agent and Coach solutions.
Three andsee in full comparisonSixNine Months EndedJanuaryApril31,30, 2026 Compared to Three andSixNine Months EndedJanuaryApril31,30, 2025
“On April 16, 2026, NRS entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “Agreement”) to acquire certain assets and assume certain liabilities of Oncore Digital, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (“the Acquired Business”). The acquired business is a digital media brokerage operation engaged in digital advertising and monetization. The acquisition closed on May 1, 2026. In connection with the transaction, the Acquired Business was contributed to a newly formed entity (“NRS OnCore”), in which the sellers retained a 20% noncontrolling interest and NRS obtained an 80% controlling interest. …”see in full comparison
“The increases reflect expense recognized in connection with DSUs granted to executive officers and employees under the Company's long-term incentive programs. The fiscal 2026 three-year DSU grant was made on September 18, 2025, however, as provided for in the incentive compensation program, the relevant vesting dates are of February 17, 2026, February 16, 2027, and February 15, 2028. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (57)
The
following information should be read in conjunction with the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and the associated
notes thereto of this Quarterly Report, and the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and our Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K asfor the fiscal year ended July 31, 2025 (the “2025 Form 10-K”) filed with the U.S.United States Securities and Exchange Commission (or SEC).
As
of JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026, we owned 94.0% of the outstanding shares of our subsidiary, net2phone 2.0, Inc., or net2phone 2.0, which owns and
operates the net2phone segment, and 82.3% of the outstanding shares of National Retail Solutions, Inc. or NRS. On a fully diluted basis assuming
all the vesting criteria related to various rights granted have been met, we would own 90.0%89.9% of the equity of net2phone 2.0 and 80.2%
of the equity of NRS.
Our results of operations discussion may include the following performance metrics:
NRS
uses fourutilizes keytwo performance metrics to measure the size of its customer base, including two that are non-GAAP measuresbase: active POS terminals and payment
processing accounts. Active POS terminals are the number of POS terminals that have completed at least one transaction in the calendar
month. It excludes POS terminals that have not been fully installed by the end of the month. Payment processing accounts are accounts
that can generate revenue. It excludes accounts that have been approved but not activated. In addition to the foregoing, NRS uses recurring
revenue as a performance metric, which consist of NRS’ revenue in accordance with U.S. GAAP, excluding its revenue from POS terminal
sales and monthly average recurring revenue per terminal.
In addition to the foregoing, NRS uses recurring revenue and monthly average recurring revenue per terminal as performance metrics. NRS recurring revenue is NRS’ revenue in accordance with U.S. GAAP, excluding its revenue from POS terminal sales. Monthly average recurring revenue per terminal is recurring revenue divided by the average number of active POS terminals in the relevant period, divided further by the number of months in the relevant period. Trends and comparisons between periods for these metrics are used in the analysis of revenue, direct cost of revenue, and gross profit.
BOSS Money uses several performance metrics including transactions, average revenue per transaction, and send volume, to evaluate customer usage and revenue productivity. Transactions represent the number of remittance transfers processed during the period, average revenue per transaction is calculated by dividing BOSS Money revenue by the number of transactions, and send volume represents the aggregate amount of principal remitted by customers. Trends and comparisons between periods for these metrics are used in the analysis of revenue, direct cost of revenue, and gross profit.
net2phone’s
UNITE (UCaaS), and uContact (CCaaS) and Coach (a contact center performance optimization tool) offerings are priced on a per-seat basis,
with customers paying based on the number of users in their organization. net2phone AI isAgent and Coach (an AI-based contact center performance optimization tool) offerings are priced according to fixed bundles of interaction credits, a
usage-based criterion.credits. net2phone’s subscription revenue is its revenue in accordance with U.S. GAAP including its AI Agent bundle offering but excluding its equipment
revenue and revenue generated by a legacy SIP trunking offering in Brazil. Trends and comparisons between periods for these metrics are used in the analysis of revenue, direct cost of revenue, and gross profit.
The
trends and comparisons between periods for the number of active POS terminals, payment processing accounts, seats served, recurring revenue,
and subscription revenue are used in the analysis of NRS’ or net2phone’s revenues and direct cost of revenues and are strong
indications of the top-line growth and performance of the business.
Minutes
of use is a nonfinancial metric that measures aggregate customer usage during a reporting period. Minutes of use is an important factor
in BOSS Revolution’s and IDT Global’s revenue recognition since satisfaction of our performance obligation occurs when the
customer uses our service. Minutes of use trends and comparisons between periods are used in the analysis of revenues andrevenues, direct cost
of revenues.revenues, and gross profits.
Three
and SixNine Months Ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 Compared to Three and SixNine Months Ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2025
National
Retail SolutionsNRS Segment
NRS,
which represented 12.3%12.0% and 10.9%10.3% of our total revenues in the three months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and 11.9%
and 10.3% of our total revenues in the sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, operates a POS network in the U.S.United States and Canada that provides independent retailers with POS equipment, store management software, electronic payment processing,
and other ancillary merchant services. NRS’ POS platform also provides marketers with digitalretail out-of-homemedia advertising and transaction
data.
Revenues.
Revenues increased in the three and sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 from the comparative prior-year periods. These increases were driven
primarily by continued growth in recurring revenue, reflecting the expansion of NRS’ retailer network, increased
penetration of payment processing services, improved payment processing economics, retail customers' increasing use of credit/debit cards rather than cash, and increased software revenue per terminal as retailers increasingly adopted premium software
as a service (SaaS) features and functionalities.
Direct
Cost of Revenues. Direct cost of revenues increased in the three and sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 from the comparative
prior-year periods. These increases wereperiods, driven primarily by higher direct costs associated with the increased scope of NRS’ operations and increased sales, including
increased costs related to POS terminal sales and merchant services.
Selling,
General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expense increased in the three and sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,
30, 2026 from the comparative prior-year periods. These increases were primarily driven by increases in personnel-related costs and other operating
expenses supporting NRS’ continued growth. As a percentage of NRS’ revenue, NRS’ selling, general and administrative
expense increaseddecreased to 59.7%61.5% from 57.6%64.2% in the three months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 and 2025, and decreased to 59.4%60.1% from 60.0%61.4% in the six
nine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively Technology
and Development. Technology and development expense increased in the three and sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 from the comparative
prior-year periods. These increases were primarily driven by general ongoing business investments to develop premium software services provided
through the NRS platform, and in other development and operations supporting our business platforms.
Fintech,
which represented 12.8%14.3% and 12.1%12.8% of our total revenues in the three months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and 13.0%
13.4% and 12.1%12.3% of our total revenues in the sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, is comprised of: (i) BOSS Money, a provider
of international money remittance and related value/payment transfer services; (ii) IDT Financial Services Limited, or IDT Financial Services, a Gibraltar-based bank; (iii) IDT Services Limited (“IDTS”), a Malta-based electronic money institution; and (iiiv) other, significantly smaller, financial services
businesses, including a variable interest entity (“VIE”), that processes disbursement payments, which we refer to as the
Disbursement Payments VIE, (iii) IDT Financial Services Limited, or IDT Financial Services, a Gibraltar-based bank and (iv) IDT Services
Limited (“IDTS”), a Malta-based electronic money institution.VIE.
Revenues.
Revenues from BOSS Money increased in the three and sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 from the comparative prior-year periods. These increases were primarily driven by higher digital transaction volumes initiated on the BOSS Money and BOSS Revolution
Calling apps.apps in addition to higher foreign currency exchange revenues to select regions, mainly Guatemala and Mexico. BOSS Money continued to benefit from cross-marketing to BOSS Revolution and IDT Digital Payments retail customers.
Direct
Cost of Revenues. Direct cost of revenues increased in the three and sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 from the comparative prior-year
periods primarily due to increases in BOSS Money’s direct cost of revenues, consistent with the growth in Boss Money revenue. As transaction volumes increase associated payout and processing fees also increase.increase, partially offset by us reducing the transaction fee that we pay to our money transfer payors.
Selling,
General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expense increased in the three and sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,
30, 2026 from the comparative prior-year periods. These modest increases primarily reflected higher debit and credit card processing charges,
chargebacks, and other operating costs associated with growth in BOSS Money’s app and digital transaction activity. As a percentage of Fintech’s
revenue, Fintech’s selling, general and administrative expense remainedincreased flatto at44.8% 44.2%from for41.5% bothin the three months ended January
31,April 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and decreased to 41.6%42.7% from 43.8%43.0% in the sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The decrease
reflects, in part, the efficiencies derived from BOSS Money’s ongoing integration of AI and machine learning in its workflows to
enhance customer service and to prevent potential chargebacks, among other priorities.
Technology
and Development. Technology and development expense increased in the three and sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 from
the comparative prior-year periods. These modest increases primarily reflected higher depreciation and amortization expense, partially offset
by lower employee compensation and development-related costs.
The
net2phone segment, which represented 7.7% and 7.3% of our total revenues in the three months ended April 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and 7.5% and 7.1% of our total revenues in the threenine months ended JanuaryApril 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively,
and 7.4% and 7.0% of our total revenues in the six months ended January 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, is comprised of net2phone’s
communications and workflow solutions including its UCaaS, CCaas,CCaaS, net2phone AI,AI Agent and Coach solutions.
Revenues.
net2phone’s revenues increased in the three and sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 from the comparative prior-year periods
primarily due to sales in itsincreased UCaaS and CCaasCCaaS services revenue, reflecting an increase in seats served during the respective periods
andperiods. gainsThe fromincrease was augmented by the impact of the increase in relatively higher revenue per seat CCaaS seats served, as well as by the positive foreign exchange.currency impact of strengthening local currencies versus the U.S. dollar in certain Latin American markets.
Direct
Cost of Revenues. Direct cost of revenues increased in the three and sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 from the comparative prior-year
periods primarily due to higherthe revenues,costs net2phone’sincurred continuedserving focusthe onexpanded mid-sizednumber businesses,of multi-channelseats strategies,served. andDirect localized
offeringscosts supportedincreased revenueslightly more slowly than revenue, as a result of the relatively rapid growth that exceeded the increase in direct cost of revenues.CCaaS seats compared to UCaaS.
Selling,
General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expense increased in the three and sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,
30, 2026 from the comparative prior-year periods. These increases were primarily driven by higher sales commissions and depreciation and amortization,
partially offset by decreases in marketing, consulting and bad debt expenses. As a percentage of net2phone’s revenues, net2phone’s
selling, general and administrative expense decreased to 59.1%58.0% from 60.3%59.1% in the three months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively,
and to 58.4% from 60.5%60.1% in the sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Technology
and Development. Technology and development expense increased modestly in the three and sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 from the comparative
prior-year periods. While certain costs, including developing net2phone's AI offerings, employee compensation, software licenses and maintenance, cloud services, and depreciation
and amortization increased, these were largely offset by disciplined cost management and the timing of project-related expenditures,
resulting in overall modest increased expenses for the period.
The
Traditional Communications segment, which represented 67.4%66.0% and 69.9%69.6% of our total revenues in the three months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026
and 2025, respectively, and 67.7%67.1% and 70.6%70.3% of our total revenues in the sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, includes:
(i) IDT Digital Payments, which enables customers to transfer airtime and bundles of airtime, messaging, and data to international and
domestic mobile accounts; (ii) BOSS Revolution, an international long-distance calling service marketed primarily to immigrant communities
in the United States and Canada; and (iii) IDT Global, a wholesale provider of international voice and SMS termination and outsourced
traffic management solutions to telecoms worldwide.worldwide; and (iii) BOSS Revolution, an international long-distance calling service marketed primarily to immigrant communities in the United States and Canada.. Traditional Communications also includes other small businesses and offerings including
early-stage business initiatives and mature businesses in harvest mode.
Traditional
Communications’ largest businesses by revenue are IDT Digital Payments, IDT Global, and BOSS Revolution. IDT
Digital Payments and BOSS Revolution are sold directly to consumers and through the BOSS Money and BOSS Revolution apps as well as
through distributors and retailers. We receive payments for BOSS Revolution and IDT Digital Payments prior to providing the
services. We recognize the revenue when services are provided to the customer. Traditional Communications’ revenues tend to be
somewhat seasonal, with the second fiscal quarter (which contains Christmas and New Year’s Day) and the fourth fiscal quarter
(which contains Mother’s Day and Father’s Day) typically showing higher minute volumes. IDT Global's revenue is generally recognized as minutes are terminated and for SMS when messages are transmitted, in accordance with wholesale carrier agreements. Customers are typically invoiced in arrears and settle balances on a periodic basis following the completion of services.
Revenues. Revenues for the Traditional Communications segment decreased in the three months ended April 30, 2026 and increased in the three
and sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 from the comparative prior-year periods. TheseThe increasesdecrease werein revenues for the three-month period was driven primarily by higherdeclines in BOSS Revolution and Other revenues, which more than offset increased revenues
from IDT Digital Payments and IDT Global. IDT Global revenues increased primarily due to higher international long-distance traffic volumes
and improved product mix. The increases in IDT Digital Payments revenues reflected higher transaction volumes and continued growth in
digital payment channels. These increases were partially offset by a decline in BOSS Revolution revenues,revenues reflectingreflected industry-wide trends,
including the proliferation of unlimited calling plans and free over-the-top voice and messaging services, which have reduced demand for
prepaid international calling plans. RevenuesThe fromdecrease in Other offeringsrevenues remainedreflected flatlower demand across certain legacy offerings. The increases in IDT Digital Payments revenues reflected higher transaction volumes and decreasedcontinued slightlygrowth forin thedigital threepayment channels. IDT Global revenues increased primarily due to higher international long-distance traffic volumes to certain locations carried by IDT Global and sixSMS monthswholesale ended
January 31, 2026 from the comparative prior-year periods, respectively.growth.
The increase in revenues for the nine-month period was driven primarily by higher revenues from IDT Digital Payments and IDT Global, which more than offset declines in BOSS Revolution and Other revenues. IDT Digital Payments revenues increased due to higher transaction volumes and continued growth in digital payment channels, while IDT Global revenues increased primarily due to higher international long-distance traffic volumes and improved product mix. The decline in BOSS Revolution revenues reflected industry-wide trends, including the proliferation of unlimited calling plans and free over-the-top voice and messaging services, which have reduced demand for prepaid international calling plans. The decrease in Other revenues reflected lower demand across certain legacy offerings.
Direct Cost
of Revenues. Direct cost of revenues increased in the three and sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 from the comparative
prior-year periods, reflecting higher minutes of use for IDT Global and associated network and carrier costs offset by lower minutes
of use and associated network and settlement costs in BOSS Revolution.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general
and administrative expense increaseddecreased in the three months ended and remained flat for the sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 from the comparative
prior-year periods. The modestdecreases increasereflect reflectsdecreases relatively stablein sales commissions and debit and credit processing charges, partially
offset by minor fluctuations in bad debt expense. As a percentage of Traditional Communications’ revenue, Traditional Communications’
selling, general and administrative expense increaseddecreased to 9.4%8.6% from 9.2%9.8% in the three months
ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and decreased to 9.0%8.9% from 9.1%9.3% in the sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Technology and
Development. Technology and development expense increased in the three and sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 from the comparative
prior-year periods. Modest increases in certain operating costs were partially offset by decreases in employee compensation, cloud services, and
depreciation and amortization expense, resulting in overall modest increases for the periods.
Corporate
General
and Administrative. Corporate general and
administrative expense decreasedincreased in the three and sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 from the comparative prior-year periods.
These modest decreasesincreases primarily reflect employee-related costs and decreased overhead expenses during the periods. As a
percentage of our consolidated revenues, CorporateAs a percentage of consolidated revenue, corporate general and administrative expense was 0.9% and 1.0%0.9% in the three months ended
January 31,April 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and 0.9%1.0% and 1.0%0.9% in the sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Stock-Based
Compensation Expense. Total stock-based compensation expense included in consolidated selling, general and administrative
expense and technology and development expense was $4.3$2.4 million and $0.9 million in the three months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 and $6.4
2025, respectively, and $8.8 million and $1.8$2.7 million in the sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. These increases primarily reflect the
expense recognized during the period related to DSUs granted to executive officers and employees under the Company’s long-term
incentive programs. As of JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026, there was $9.6$7.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested
DSUs, which is being recognized on a graded vesting basis over the requisite service periods that end in February 2028.
The increases reflect expense recognized in connection with DSUs granted to executive officers and employees under the Company's long-term incentive programs. The fiscal 2026 three-year DSU grant was made on September 18, 2025, however, as provided for in the incentive compensation program, the relevant vesting dates are of February 17, 2026, February 16, 2027, and February 15, 2028. Accordingly the vesting periods for determining the amortization of the related charges were shorter than twelve and twenty-four months, resulting in an accelerated charge during the first quarters following the grant date. In addition, the grant-date fair value of the DSUs was higher than previous year as it was determined using a base stock price of $50.90 per share, reflecting the price of the Company's Class B common stock as of the date of internal discussions related to the grant (February 2025), rather than the closing market price of $67.91 per share on the actual grant date of September 18, 2025, resulting in greater value being place on the grants for accounting purposes.
Other
Income (Expense),Income, net. Other income (expense),income, net consists of the following:
We
have an investment in shares of convertible preferred stock of MarketSpark Inc., a communications company (“MarketSpark”).
As of both JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 and 2025, our ownership was 33.4% of MarketSpark’s outstanding shares on an as converted basis. We
account for this investment using the equity method since we can exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies
of MarketSpark but do not have a controlling interest. We determined that on the dates of the acquisitions of MarketSpark’s shares,
there were differences between our investment in MarketSpark and our proportional interest in the equity of MarketSpark of an aggregate
of $8.2 million, which represented the share of MarketSpark’s customer list on the dates of the acquisitions attributed to our
interest in MarketSpark. These basis differences are being amortized over the 6-year estimated life of the customer list. “Equity
in the net loss of investee” includes the amortization of equity method basis difference.
Provision
for Income Taxes. The change in income tax expense in the three and sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 compared to the comparable
prior-year periods was primarily due to differences in the amount of taxable income earned in the various taxing jurisdictions.
Net
Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests. The change in the net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in the
three and sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 compared to the comparable prior-year periods was primarily due to changes in net income
attributable to the noncontrolling interests in NRS and theour Disbursement Payments VIE.
As
of the date of this Quarterly Report, we believe that our cash flow from operations and the balance of cash, cash equivalents, debt securities,
and current equity investments that we held on JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 will be sufficient to meet our currently anticipated working capital
and capital expenditure requirements during the twelve-month period ending JanuaryApril 31,30, 2027.
At
January 31,April 30, 2026, we had cash, cash equivalents, debt securities, and current equity investments of $246.2$251.4 million (excluding restricted
cash and cash equivalents) and working capital (current assets in excess of current liabilities) of $264.4$284.7 million.
The
following table includes our anticipated material cash requirements from contractual obligations and other commitments at JanuaryApril 31,
30, 2026:
Our
cash flow from operations varies significantly from quarter to quarter and from year to year, depending on our operating results and
the timing of operating cash receipts and payments, generally trade accounts receivable andreceivable, trade accounts payable.payable During the six months
ended January 31, 2026, net cash provided by operating activities was $28.2 million, compared to $20.3 million for the prior-year period,
which includesand the impact of settlement assets andassets, disbursements prefunding and customer fund deposits.
Settlement
assets and disbursements prefunding increased $42.0$7.8 million and $8.3$59.0 million, respectively, during the sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,
30, 2026, compared to the prior-year period. The increase in settlement assets reflects
a higher level of funds due from customers for pending money-remittances at BOSS Money. The increase in disbursements prefunding reflects,
for the most part, higher levels of funds pre-paid to disbursement partners to fulfill expected customer remittance obligations at BOSS
Money, and, to a smaller extent, higher levels of pre-payments made to providers of goods and services to fulfill expected customer purchases
of goods and services obligations at IDT Digital Payments.
Towards
the end of each week, IDT needs to prefundprefunds BOSS Money disbursement partners for remittances expected during the upcoming weekend. As
a result, Friday is typically the day of the week on which IDT’s cash balance is at its lowest level, after prefunding disbursements
for the upcoming weekend. Conversely, Wednesday is typically the day of the week on which IDT’s cash balance is at its highest
level, after IDT collects cash from digital processors and retailers for all of the remittances originated during the preceding weekend
but before the new weekly cycle of prefunding disbursements for the upcoming weekend begins again. This weekly cycle constitutes a significant
working capital use of the Company’s cash, and, as such, the day of the week on which the quarter ends can have significant impact
on the cash balance reported at the balance sheet date.
Customer fund deposits decreasedincreased $9.6$12.1 million during the sixnine months ended
January 31,April 30, 2026 reflecting balances held on behalf of customers across our prepaid, digital payments, and disbursements programs. These
balances are supported by restricted cash and cash equivalents held by IDT Financial Services and our Disbursement Payments VIE and fluctuate
based on transaction volume and program activity On
June 21, 2018, the United States Supreme Court rendered a decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., holding that a state may require
a remote seller with no physical presence in the state to collect and remit sales tax on goods and services provided to purchasers in
the state, overturning certain existing court precedent. It is possible that one or more jurisdictions may assert that we have liability
for periods for which we have not collected sales, use or other similar taxes, and if such an assertion or assertions were successful
it could materially and adversely affect our business, financial position, and operating results. One or more jurisdictions may change
their laws or policies to apply their sales, use or other similar taxes to our operations, and if such changes were made it could materially
and adversely affect our business, financial position, and operating results.
As
discussed in Note 16 to the Condensed2025 ConsolidatedForm Financial Statements included in Item 1 to Part I of this Quarterly Report,10-K, we and
other parties were named in a putative class action and derivative complaint related to Straight Path Communications Inc. filed in the
Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware. The Court dismissed all claims against us, and found that, contrary to the plaintiffs’
allegations, the class suffered no damages. The plaintiffs filed an appeal to which we answered. Oral argument was held on October 22,
2025, and on December 3, 2025, the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the favorable decision of the Court of Chancery that dismissed all
claims against us and found that Plaintiff and the class suffered no damages.
During the sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026, we deployed $12.0$17.1 million
for capital expenditures. We currently anticipate that total capital expenditures in the twelve-month period ending JanuaryApril 31,30, 2027 will
be $22$23.0 million to $23$24.0 million. We expect to fund our capital expenditures with our net cash provided by operating activities and cash,
cash equivalents, debt securities, and current equity investments on hand.
In February 2025, we entered into a loan agreement with MarketSpark for
a revolving credit facility. The aggregate principal amount available under the facility is $2.0 million. The loans incur interest at
12% 12.0% per annum payable semiannually and are due and payable in February 2027. In February 2025, the Company loaned MarketSpark $0.5 million
under the revolving credit facility. In May 2025, June 2025 and July 2025, the Company loaned MarketSpark an additional $0.4aggregate amount of $1.4 million for an aggregate of $1.9 million
under the revolving credit facility.
During the sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026, purchases of debt securities
and equity investments were $25.8$43.0 million and proceeds from maturities and sales of debt securities and redemptions of equity investments
were $17.3$34.6 million.
On April 16, 2026, NRS entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “Agreement”) to acquire certain assets and assume certain liabilities of Oncore Digital, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (“the Acquired Business”). The acquired business is a digital media brokerage operation engaged in digital advertising and monetization. The acquisition closed on May 1, 2026. In connection with the transaction, the Acquired Business was contributed to a newly formed entity (“NRS OnCore”), in which the sellers retained a 20% noncontrolling interest and NRS obtained an 80% controlling interest. As a result, NRS consolidates NRS OnCore under the voting interest model. The aggregate preliminary purchase consideration, which is subject to finalization, is currently estimated to be approximately $4.8 million, consisting of $3.3 million in cash and shares of IDT Class B common stock with an aggregate value of $1.5 million, subject to customary post-closing adjustments, as well as contingent earnouts upon certain milestones being achieved. The acquisition will integrate OnCore's ad tech, demand, and publisher network with NRS' screen network and first-party transaction data to form a more uniform offering.
In
the sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026, we paid aggregate cash dividends of $0.12$0.19 per share on our Class A and Class B common stock for an aggregate
amount of $3.0$4.8 million. In the sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2025, we paid aggregate cash dividends of $0.10$0.16 per share on our Class A
and Class B common stock for an aggregate cash dividends of $2.5$4.0 million.
On
March 9,May 29, 2026, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend on our Class A and Class B common stock of $0.07 per share payable on
or about MarchJune 31,18, 2026 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on MarchJune 19,9, 2026.
IDT
Telecom, Inc. (“IDT Telecom”), aour subsidiary of us,subsidiary, maintains a $25.0 million revolving credit facility with TD Bank, N.A.
maturing which was scheduled to mature on May 16, 2026. Effective May 12, 2026, the Company obtained an extension of the maturity date to July 15, 2026, and is currently in the process of renewing the facility. The revolving credit facility is secured by primarilysubstantially all of IDT Telecom’s assets and bears interest
at the secured overnight financing rate (“SOFR”) plus a margin of 125-175 basis points, depending on leverage. At January
31,April 30, 2026 and July 31, 2025, there were no amounts outstanding under this facility. During the sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 and 2025,
IDT Telecom borrowed and repaid $16.0$21.4 million and $24.5$24.6 million, respectively.
We
have an existing stock repurchase program authorized by our Board of Directors for the repurchase of shares of our Class B common stock.
In January 2016, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 8.0 million shares in the aggregate. In the sixnine months ended
January 31,April 30, 2026, we repurchased 307,533391,186 shares of our Class B common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $15.0$19.0 million. In the six
nine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2025, we repurchased 217,052221,823 shares of our Class B common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $9.9$10.1 million.
At JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026, 3.93.8 million shares remained available for repurchase under the stock repurchase program.
In
the sixnine months ended JanuaryApril 31,30, 2026 and 2025, the Company withheld nil10,852 shares and 32,022157,180 shares, valued at nil$0.5 million and $1.5
$7.7 million, respectively, of the Company’s Class B common stock from employees to satisfy the employees’ tax withholding obligations
in connection with the vesting of deferred stock units (“DSUs”) and the lapsing of restrictions on restricted stock. The
value of the shares is based on the fair market value as of the close of business on the trading day immediately prior to the vesting
date. These shares are not repurchased under the Company’s share repurchase program.
IDT insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 12 filings (7 insiders, 10 trade dates, 71,253 shares, about $4.0M). Net open-market shares: -71,253 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$4.0M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | Cosentino Eric F. |
Open-market sale | 500 | $78.55 | $39.3K |
| 2026-10-01 | Shea Nadine |
Open-market sale | 400 | $78.03 | $31.2K |
| 2026-10-01 | Silberman Mitch |
Open-market sale | 3,375 | $79.37 | $267.9K |
| 2026-08-31 | Jonas Howard S |
Gift | 1,165 | — | — |
| 2026-07-17 | Mason Joyce J |
Open-market sale | 3,488 | $62.56 | $218.2K |
| 2026-07-17 | Mason Joyce J |
Open-market sale | 505 | $62.58 | $31.6K |
| 2026-07-16 | Ash Menachem |
Open-market sale | 3,653 | $63.17 | $230.8K |
| 2026-07-15 | Ash Menachem |
Open-market sale | 4,397 | $63.02 | $277.1K |
| 2026-06-30 | Cosentino Eric F. |
Open-market sale | 500 | $57.78 | $28.9K |
| 2026-06-26 | Fischer Marcelo |
Open-market sale | 23,323 | $56.98 | $1.3M |
| 2026-06-23 | Jonas Howard S |
Gift | 2,217 | — | — |
| 2026-06-11 | Katsof Irwin |
Open-market sale | 2,408 | $55.03 | $132.5K |
| 2026-06-09 | Conkling William |
Grant/award | 673 | $55.75 | $37.5K |
| 2026-06-08 | Shea Nadine |
Open-market sale | 500 | $55.32 | $27.7K |
| 2026-05-07 | Mason Joyce J |
Gift | 722 | — | — |
| 2026-05-07 | Mason Joyce J |
Gift | 722 | — | — |
| 2026-05-07 | Mason Joyce J |
Gift | 722 | — | — |
| 2026-05-07 | Jonas Howard S |
Gift | 7,942 | — | — |
| 2026-05-05 | Jonas Howard S |
Gift | 1,175 | — | — |
| 2026-04-16 | Jonas Howard S |
Gift | 600 | — | — |
| 2026-04-16 | Mason Joyce J |
Open-market sale | 2,297 | $50.94 | $117.0K |
| 2026-04-16 | Mason Joyce J |
Open-market sale | 907 | $50.94 | $46.2K |
| 2026-04-14 | Ash Menachem |
Open-market sale | 20,000 | $51.00 | $1.0M |
| 2026-04-14 | Fischer Marcelo |
Open-market sale | 5,000 | $50.50 | $252.5K |
| 2026-01-28 | Jonas Howard S |
Gift | 2,214 | — | — |
Well-known investors holding IDT (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 879,008 | $51.1M | 0.07% | Reduced 7% |
| D. E. Shaw & Co. | 2026-06-30 | 295,788 | $17.2M | 0.01% | Added 24% |
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 186,236 | $10.8M | 0.0% | Added 103% |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 167,669 | $9.8M | 0.01% | Reduced 25% |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 159,819 | $9.3M | 0.01% | Reduced 11% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 96,634 | $5.6M | 0.0% | Reduced 17% |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 71,130 | $4.1M | 0.01% | Reduced 35% |
| Gotham Asset Management (Joel Greenblatt) | 2026-06-30 | 7,449 | $433.2K | 0.0% | Reduced 68% |