III 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Information Services Group Inc. · Nasdaq · Services-Management Consulting Services · CIK 1371489 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “The development, deployment, and use of artificial intelligence technologies, including generative AI, involve significant legal, regulatory, operational, ethical and commercial risks, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and reputation.”
New heading “Changes to trade policy, including new or increased tariffs and changing import/export regulations, may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.”
New heading “We are exposed to risks related to artificial intelligence.”
New heading “We may experience employment-related claims, commercial indemnification claims and other legal proceedings that could materially harm our business.”
Largest changes
“The regulatory framework governing AI is rapidly evolving and varies significantly across jurisdictions in which we operate. New or amended laws, regulations, standards or guidance may impose additional obligations on the development, use, auditing or documentation of AI systems, restrict certain uses of AI, require enhanced disclosures, or create new liabilities. Compliance with such frameworks may require substantial investment in governance, controls, reporting processes and oversight mechanisms. …”see in full comparison
“Changes to trade policy, including new or increased tariffs and changing import/export regulations, may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.”see in full comparison
“The development, deployment, and use of artificial intelligence technologies, including generative AI, involve significant legal, regulatory, operational, ethical and commercial risks, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and reputation.”see in full comparison
“Changes in U.S. or international laws and policies governing foreign trade could materially and adversely affect our business. The U.S. has instituted certain changes, and has proposed additional changes, in trade policies that include the negotiation or termination of trade agreements, the imposition of higher tariffs on imports into the U.S. and other government regulations affecting trade between the U.S. and other countries where we conduct our business. The new tariffs and other changes in U.S. …”see in full comparison
“AI systems may generate outputs that are inaccurate, biased, incomplete, unpredictable or otherwise unintended. Such outcomes could result in operational failures, adverse client impacts, misinformed decision-making, or reputational harm. Any failure by us—or by third parties whose tools or data we use—to appropriately design, test, validate, monitor or govern AI systems could expose us to contractual claims, indemnification demands, regulatory enforcement, litigation, financial penalties or other liabilities.”see in full comparison
Various statutes and rules regulate conduct in areas such assee in full comparisonprivacyprivacy, data protection, anddata protectioncybersecurity that may affect our collection, use, storage, and transfer of information both abroad and in the United States. Compliance with these laws and self-regulatory codes may require us to make certain investments or may dictate that we not offer certain types of services or only offer such services after making necessary modifications. Moreover, these laws and regulations impose operational requirements, including disclosures to consumers about personal data practices, opt-out and consent choices and required contractual terms with certain third parties, and obligations to provide notice to individuals, third parties, and/or regulators in the event of certain cybersecurity incidents involving personal data. Failure to comply with these laws and self-regulatory codes may result in, among other things, civil and criminal liability, negative publicity, restrictions on further use ofdatadata, fines, and/or liability under contractual warranties.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (34)
Since our inception, we have expanded through acquisitions.acquisitions, including our most recent acquisition of Martino & Partners s.r.l. (“Martino & Partners”), a strategic advisory firm serving public and private sector clients in Italy, on September 1, 2025. In the future, we plan to pursue additional acquisitions and investments as opportunities arise. We may not be able to successfully integrate businesses that we acquire in the future without substantial expense, delays or other operational or financial problems. In addition, we may not be able to identify, acquire or profitably manage additional businesses. If we pursue acquisition or investment opportunities, these potential risks could disrupt our ongoing business, result in the loss of key customers or personnel, increase expenses and otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We have conducted dispositions in the pastpast, most recently disposing of our automation business in 2024, and may again in the future. Disposition involve risks and uncertainties, such as our ability to sell such businesses for a satisfactory price and terms and in a timely manner, or at all, potential disruptions to other parts of our organization and distraction of management, the reallocation of internal resources that would otherwise be devoted to completing strategic acquisitions, potential losses of key employees or customers, exposure to unanticipated liabilities, any ongoing obligations to support the business following any such disposition, and other adverse financial impacts. The realization of any of these risks could adversely affect our business.
Artificial Intelligence (“AI”)intelligence presents new risks and challenges that may affect our business. We have made, and expect to continue to make, investments to integrate AI and machine learning technology into our services. Given the nature of AI technology, we face significant competition from other companies and an evolving regulatory landscape. Our AI efforts may not be successful, and our competitors may incorporate AI into their products more successfully than us, which could impair our ability to compete effectively and adversely affect our financial results. The rapid evolution of AI combined with the uncertain and often inconsistent regulatory landscape may require significant additional resources and costs and could in some cases limit our ability to implement AI capabilities in our solutions or potentially result in the implementation failing to produce the desired outcome. Despite our implementation of programs designed to support responsible AI use and development, we may not successfully address all issues that may arise. For example, privacy concerns, user consent, supply chain security, transparency and the accuracy, completeness and suitability of data sets are all potential issues that could adversely affect our business, reputation or financial results.
The development, deployment, and use of artificial intelligence technologies, including generative AI, involve significant legal, regulatory, operational, ethical and commercial risks, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and reputation.
We are increasing our use of AI across our service delivery, advisory offerings and internal operations. AI technologies are at an early stage of development and present uncertainties regarding reliability, accuracy, explainability, data governance and long-term economic viability. Although we are dedicating resources to AI-related investments, training and partnerships, we may be unable to develop, procure, implement, or maintain AI tools and capabilities in a manner that meets client requirements, complies with applicable laws or produces anticipated operational or financial benefits.
AI systems may generate outputs that are inaccurate, biased, incomplete, unpredictable or otherwise unintended. Such outcomes could result in operational failures, adverse client impacts, misinformed decision-making, or reputational harm. Any failure by us—or by third parties whose tools or data we use—to appropriately design, test, validate, monitor or govern AI systems could expose us to contractual claims, indemnification demands, regulatory enforcement, litigation, financial penalties or other liabilities.
The regulatory framework governing AI is rapidly evolving and varies significantly across jurisdictions in which we operate. New or amended laws, regulations, standards or guidance may impose additional obligations on the development, use, auditing or documentation of AI systems, restrict certain uses of AI, require enhanced disclosures, or create new liabilities. Compliance with such frameworks may require substantial investment in governance, controls, reporting processes and oversight mechanisms. Failure to comply—whether actual or perceived—may result in investigations, fines, operational restrictions, adverse publicity or loss of client trust.
Our competitive position may be adversely affected by rapid technological change and heightened competition related to AI. Competitors, including global consultancies, technology vendors, hyperscalers and emerging AI-native firms, may introduce capabilities that exceed or supplant our own. Clients may accelerate internal development of AI capabilities that reduce demand for our services. AI and automation may also diminish the need for certain services currently provided by our personnel, and we may not be able to adjust our delivery model, pricing, staffing, training or organizational structure in a timely or cost-effective manner.
In addition, our AI capabilities depend on access to third-party infrastructure, data sets, cloud environments, software, models and specialized hardware. Supply constraints, increased pricing, licensing limitations, service interruptions, security vulnerabilities and/or incidents, or changes in contractual terms could materially impair our ability to develop, deliver or support AI-related services. Uncertainties regarding ownership, licensing or permissible use of training data, model outputs or other intellectual property may expose us to disputes, forced modifications, operational delays or damages.
Any of the foregoing factors—individually or collectively—could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and reputation.
● global economic and political conditions and related risks, including acts of terrorism, war, such as the war in Ukraine and the conflict in the Middle East, pandemics, inflation, slowing growth, rising interest rates and recession; and
Clients’ failure or inability to pay for our services, whether on a timely basis or at all, could materially, adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
As further described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Summary of Significant Account Policies – Accounts Receivable, Contract Assets and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts,” the Company has been engaged in litigation with certain clients who have either failed to make payments as per the contracted payment schedule or have disputed account receivable balances for services rendered. While we maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of clients to pay fees or for disputes that affect our ability to fully collect billed accounts receivable, our actual experience may vary from these estimates, and there is no guarantee that such allowance will ultimately be sufficient. We may be required to record additional allowances or write offs in future periods, which, in turn, could adversely impact our financial condition and results of operation.
Moreover, while the Company continues to aggressively pursue legal action and/or collection against clients who dispute charges or fail to make payments, there is no guarantee that the Company’s legal actions will be successful, that actual collections from clients will reflect the Company’s estimate of amounts owed, and/or that the Company will be able to recoup legal fees expended on such actions.
Our 25 largest clients accounted for approximately 30% and 33% of revenue in 2024both 2025 and 2023, respectively.2024. If one or more of our large clients terminate, significantly reduce their engagement or fail to remain a viable business, then our revenues could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, sizable receivable balances could be jeopardized if large clients fail to remain a going concern.
Approximately 34% of our revenues for 2025 and 36% of our revenues for 2024 and 39% of our revenue for 2023 were derived from sales outside of the Americas. Our operating results are subject to the risks inherent in international business activities, including:
● crime, strikes, riots, civil disturbances, pandemics, terrorist attacks and wars, such as the war in Ukraine and the conflict in the Middle Eastwars;
Changes to trade policy, including new or increased tariffs and changing import/export regulations, may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Changes in U.S. or international laws and policies governing foreign trade could materially and adversely affect our business. The U.S. has instituted certain changes, and has proposed additional changes, in trade policies that include the negotiation or termination of trade agreements, the imposition of higher tariffs on imports into the U.S. and other government regulations affecting trade between the U.S. and other countries where we conduct our business. The new tariffs and other changes in U.S. trade policy have triggered retaliatory actions by affected countries, and foreign governments have instituted, or are considering imposing, trade sanctions on U.S. goods.
The imposition of tariffs and other trade restrictions, as well as the escalation of trade disputes and any downturns in the global economy resulting therefrom, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The extent and duration of the tariffs and other trade restrictions and the resulting impact on general economic conditions and on our business are uncertain and depend on various factors, such as negotiations between the U.S. and affected countries, the responses of other countries or regions, exemptions or exclusions that may be granted, the availability and cost of alternative sources of supply and demand for our services in affected markets.
Data protection and emerging cybersecurity laws and self-regulatory codes may restrict our activities and increase our costs.
Various statutes and rules regulate conduct in areas such as privacyprivacy, data protection, and data protectioncybersecurity that may affect our collection, use, storage, and transfer of information both abroad and in the United States. Compliance with these laws and self-regulatory codes may require us to make certain investments or may dictate that we not offer certain types of services or only offer such services after making necessary modifications. Moreover, these laws and regulations impose operational requirements, including disclosures to consumers about personal data practices, opt-out and consent choices and required contractual terms with certain third parties, and obligations to provide notice to individuals, third parties, and/or regulators in the event of certain cybersecurity incidents involving personal data. Failure to comply with these laws and self-regulatory codes may result in, among other things, civil and criminal liability, negative publicity, restrictions on further use of datadata, fines, and/or liability under contractual warranties.
As a global company, ISG must comply with various international and domestic data privacy regulations such as (i) the EU and UK General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which has extra-territorial scope and substantial fines for breaches (up to 4% of global annual revenue or €20 million, whichever is greater), (ii) the California Consumer Privacy Act, which, unlike data privacy provisions enacted by other US states, covers individuals acting in a commercial or employment context not just as consumers, and (iii) the Australian Privacy Act, among others. In addition, India’s Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology notified the newDigital IndiaPersonal Data Protection Rules 2025 (the “Rules”) November 13, 2025, operationalizing the Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 (“DPDPDPDPA”) draftenacted rulesby arethe outParliament of India in August 2023. Companies operating in India must meet the DPDPA’s core compliance obligations, which includes reporting data breaches within seventy-two hours, appointing consent managers and data protection officers, and implementing systems for consultation,express whichuser closed in February 2025. The DPDP is anticipated to come into forcepermission, within twoa years.phased twelve-to-eighteen-month timeline. Like the GDPR, the DPDPDPDPA has extra-territorial reach. The DPDPDPDPA shares many provisions with existing privacy laws, and ISG therefore anticipates that its existing processes already broadly align with the new law. However, like the GDPR, failure to comply with the DPDPDPDPA may lead to substantial fines. ISG is also continuing to monitor the development of and public guidelines regarding the EU’s ePrivacy Regulation and published guidelines to determine whether further action asis required.
A significant portion of our business is conducted over the internet, and we rely on the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential, sensitive, proprietary and other types of information relating to our business operations and confidential and sensitive information about our clients and employees in our computer systems and networks, and in those of our third-party vendors. Individuals, groupsgroups, state-sponsored organization, and state-sponsoredactors organizationsutilizing AI may take steps that pose threats to our operations, our computer systems, our employees, and our clients. The cybersecurity risks we face range from cyberattacks common to most industries, such as the development and deployment of malicious software to gain access to our networks and attempt to steal confidential information, launch distributed denial of service attacks or attempts at other coordinated disruptions, to more advanced threats that target us because of our prominence in the global research and advisory field. Ransomware risk has increased significantly in recent years and presents a significant risk of financial extortion and loss of data. Our operating model allows employees to continue to work remotely or on a hybrid basis, which magnifies the importance of the integrity of our remote access security measures.
We also face risks related to our use of third-party supplierssuppliers, ifwith whom we may share data and operational systems. If such suppliers are affected by a cybersecurity threat or incident, whichit could result in not only a reduction in or loss of their ability to service us (which could be a significant component of our services to clients), but also the exposure of ISG or client data or a potential backdoor into ISG’s systems and network.
We are exposed to risks related to artificial intelligence.
We recognize that our use of AI introduces risks related to data protection, cybersecurity, model integrity, confidentiality and operational reliability. In particular, our use of AI technologies may expose us to errors, data quality issues, security vulnerabilities, or other harms, especially as these technologies can behave unpredictably, fail, or produce inaccurate or biased outputs. Failures in oversight, system design, or data quality could result in various harms to us or our clients, including, but not limited to, operational disruptions, security or privacy incidents, and/or reputational challenges. Because AI systems can be complex and difficult to fully evaluate or audit, we may be unable to detect errors or vulnerabilities in a timely manner. If we are unable to effectively implement, monitor, and manage these technologies, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected.
In light of these risks, we have established governance processes intended to support the responsible evaluation, approval, deployment and monitoring of AI tools used in our internal operations and in client delivery. These processes include review mechanisms for higher-risk AI use cases, defined roles and responsibilities for management oversight, and coordination among our information security, legal, compliance and risk management functions.
Our Board of Directors, through its designee, the Information Security Committee (“ISC”), receives periodic updates from management regarding emerging AI-related risks, regulatory developments, and the potential impact of AI on our operations, technology environment and risk profile. Management is responsible for implementing controls, policies, training and monitoring procedures relevant to AI technologies, including restrictions on the use of unapproved or public AI tools that may create confidentiality, cybersecurity or compliance risks.
As AI technologies and associated global and domestic laws and regulations continue to evolve, we may be required to, among other things: enhance our governance frameworks, controls, documentation and reporting practices, increase our compliance costs; and/or limit our use of certain technologies. There can be no assurance that our processes will be sufficient to prevent or mitigate all AI-related risks, and failures or limitations in these processes could have a material adverse effect on our operations, reputation or regulatory posture. Moreover, any failure to comply with emerging AI regulatory frameworks could result in enforcement actions, fines, or other adverse consequences.
The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) provides a framework for companies to assess and improve their internal control systems. Auditing Standard No. 5 provides the professional standards and related performance guidance for auditors to attest to, and report on, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting under Section 404. Management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting requires management to make subjective judgments and,and some of the judgments will be in areas that may be open to interpretation. Therefore, our management’s report on our internal control over financial reporting may be difficult to prepare, and our auditors may not agree with our management’s assessment.
We may experience employment-related claims, commercial indemnification claims and other legal proceedings that could materially harm our business.
We currently are, and may again in the future be, subject to employment-related claims in certain of the jurisdictions in which we operate, including claims of wage and hour violations. We incur a risk of liability for claims relating to employment-related matters, contractual obligations, government inquiries and other claims. Some or all of these claims may give rise to litigation or settlements, which may cause us to incur costs or have other material adverse impacts on our financial statements. Additionally, new employment and labor laws and regulations may be proposed or adopted in the jurisdictions in which we operate that may increase the potential exposure of employers to employment-related claims and litigation.
Certain clients have negotiated broad indemnification provisions regarding the services we provide. In addition, we may have liability to our clients for the action or inaction of our consultants that may cause harm to our clients or third parties. In some cases, we must indemnify our clients for certain acts of our consultants or arising from our consultants’ presence on the client’s job site. We may also incur fines, penalties, and losses that are not covered by insurance or negative publicity with respect to these matters.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
Largest changes
Total operating expenses decreased bysee in full comparison$34.6$14.9 million, or approximately13%,6%, in2024.2025. The decrease in operating expenses was primarily dueprimarilyto lowercontract labor of $13.7 million, compensation expenses of $10.5 million,automation license feesof $5.7 million, contingent consideration adjustmentexpense of$2.5$8.0 million, restructuring costs of $2.6 million, acquisition and disposition-related costs of $2.4 million,non-cashcompensation expense of $2.7 million, expense reversal associated with an amount that was no longer due to a sub-contractor of $1.9 million, computer expense of $0.3 million, bad debt expense of $0.2 million, and stock-based compensation of$1.1 million, professional fees of $0.7 million and travel and entertainment expenses of $0.6$0.2 million. These costs were partially offset by the prior year’s contingent consideration adjustment of $1.5 million, higheracquisition-legal reserves of $1.9 million, travel anddisposition-relatedentertainmentcostexpense of$2.7$1.2millionmillion, andbadprofessionaldebt expensefees of $0.6 million.
“AI is also playing a role in modernizing our approach to sourcing advisory, through our groundbreaking ISG Tango sourcing platform. With ISG Tango, we have digitized elements of our market-leading sourcing transactions business to better serve clients and improve transaction speed and efficiency. The platform draws on our unmatched data assets, intellectual property and proprietary tools, powered by AI to automate contracting and provide real-time predictive insights that streamline the transaction process and accelerate time to agreement.”see in full comparison
“In another move to expand our capabilities, we acquired the AI Maturity Index in January this year. This AI readiness benchmarking and intelligence platform allows organizations to identify gaps in their workforce readiness and use a data-driven approach to achieve rapid improvement. This offering is already generating strong interest and opening up new client discussions about our broad range of AI-related capabilities.”see in full comparison
“Enterprise AI consulting and research, not surprisingly, played a significant part in our growth, and now represents about 30 percent of our firmwide revenue, up from 10 percent last year. We have served more than 350 clients with AI advisory and research services this year, focusing on strategy, sourcing, data transformation and agentic AI. That’s up more than 200 percent from the prior year.”see in full comparison
“Our ISG Research business delivered double-digit growth, led by our ISG Provider Lens® provider evaluation research and ISG Events. Client interest in AI-related content continues to rise, evidenced by our five sold-out AI Impact Summit events held across the globe in 2025. In addition, our third annual State of Enterprise AI Adoption study quickly became our most downloaded report ever.”see in full comparison
“Born out of our first-mover research on the state of the AI services market in 2023, Enterprise AI is really an extension of our existing capabilities, leveraging our market influence and permission as the world’s leading sourcing and governance advisor to help clients navigate the complexities and implications of adopting this game-changing technology at scale.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (35)
Information Services Group, Inc. (Nasdaq: III) is a global Artificial AI-centered technology research and advisory firm. A trusted partner to more than 900 clients, including 75 of the world’s top 100 enterprises, ISG is a long-time leader in technology and business services sourcing that is now at the forefront of leveraging AI to help organizations achieve operational excellence and faster growth. The firm, founded in 2006, is known for its proprietary market data,data and research, in-depth knowledge and governance of provider ecosystems, and the expertise of its 1,3001,500 professionals worldwide working together to help clients maximize the value of their technology investments. For more information, visit www.isg-one.com. The content on our website is available for informational purposes only. It should not be relied upon for investment purposes, nor is it incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10 K or any other filings.
Inflation rates and the adverse effect of interest rates havecontinued beento be volatile in the past year. Inflation has not had a material effect on our business operations, financial performance and results of operations, other than its impact on the general economy. Changes to interest rates has impacted our business operations, financial performance and results of operations, as our interest expense has decreased from $6.2 million in 2023 to $5.8 million in 2024.2024 to $4.1 million in 2025. The Company continuously monitors these changes and evaluates any effect. If our costs, in particular personnel-related costs, were to become subject to significant inflationary pressures, we may not be able to fully offset such higher costs through price increases in future periods. Our inability or failure to realize these offsets could adversely affect our business operations, financial performance and results of operations.
2025 was a year of accelerating growth for ISG. Fueled by continuing client interest in our AI-powered transformation services, an improved business mix and our disciplined operating approach.
Our 2025 results were achieved in the face of macroeconomic headwinds that resulted in longer decision cycles and cautious spending. Leading the way was our Americas business, which had its strongest revenue growth since 2021, up 11 percent, excluding 2024 results from our divested automation unit. We also saw solid improvement in our EMEA region in the second half, capped by 28 percent growth in the fourth quarter as the region began to recover from earlier macro challenges.
Enterprise AI consulting and research, not surprisingly, played a significant part in our growth, and now represents about 30 percent of our firmwide revenue, up from 10 percent last year. We have served more than 350 clients with AI advisory and research services this year, focusing on strategy, sourcing, data transformation and agentic AI. That’s up more than 200 percent from the prior year.
Our recurring revenue, meanwhile, continues to be a strength, with growth driven by our Research and Governance units. Recurring revenues, highly valued for their predictability, represented 46 percent of our firmwide total in 2025.
Our ISG Research business delivered double-digit growth, led by our ISG Provider Lens® provider evaluation research and ISG Events. Client interest in AI-related content continues to rise, evidenced by our five sold-out AI Impact Summit events held across the globe in 2025. In addition, our third annual State of Enterprise AI Adoption study quickly became our most downloaded report ever.
Software continues to be a significant spend category for enterprises, with global spending expected to double to more than $1.4 trillion by end of 2030, with AI as a catalyst. In 2025, our Software unit achieved double-digit growth, reflecting strong enterprise demand for insights and support in this area.
Our ISG Platforms, infused with the power of AI, also performed well, especially our ISG GovernX® supplier governance and risk management platform. Leveraging GovernX, our Governance unit served more than 80 clients in 2025, growing both revenue and capabilities. Soon to be launched is a new AI governance solution that will help clients manage AI risk.
ISG Tango™, our AI-powered, future-proof sourcing solution, has quickly become our most successful platform product to date. We are now managing more than $25 billion of total contract value through the platform, as we continue to transition our sourcing work to Tango. In addition to modernizing and ensuring our entire sourcing process is more efficient, ISG Tango also gives us the platform capabilities we need to expand into the underserved mid-market (enterprises with $10 billion of revenue or less). With the power of Tango and our dedicated approach, we have been very successful in penetrating this market, adding more than 50 new clients in 2025.
Our Enterprise Change and Training as a Service (TaaS) business had a strong year, landing some of our largest multi-year accounts in 2025. Importantly, the number of our broader advisory engagements that included OCM increased by 20 percent this year, as change management becomes more integral to our solutioning.
In addition to our organic growth initiatives, we expanded our business in Europe this year by acquiring Martino & Partners, a highly regarded strategic advisory firm that serves primarily public sector clients in Italy. This acquisition expands our addressable market in Italy, where we see an emerging growth opportunity.
In another move to expand our capabilities, we acquired the AI Maturity Index in January this year. This AI readiness benchmarking and intelligence platform allows organizations to identify gaps in their workforce readiness and use a data-driven approach to achieve rapid improvement. This offering is already generating strong interest and opening up new client discussions about our broad range of AI-related capabilities.
2024 was a challenging year for our industry and our firm. Enterprises were cautious in the face of challenging global economic and geopolitical conditions, pulling back on discretionary technology spending. This impacted the entire technology services industry. But the clouds of client caution are beginning to lift, and we are starting to see signs client spending is on the rise, beginning in the U.S., in the early months of 2025.
In particular, we are seeing a resurgence in cloud transformations, as clients push even more infrastructure and applications to the cloud. The cloud offers both operating efficiencies and the scalability needed to power large language models and AI-driven applications.
ISG has been investing in AI for more than two years now. In that time, we’ve been making AI investments in our people, platforms and products, to better serve our clients and help them harness the power of AI to achieve operational excellence and faster growth.
In February 2025, we announced a strategic repositioning of our firm, reflecting the expanding role ISG has been playing in helping our clients adopt AI at scale. We are now positioned as a “global AI-centered technology research and advisory firm.”
AI is at the heart of everything we do—from the technology strategies we develop and the partners we recommend to our clients, to the impact of AI on the future of work. We have truly become an AI-centered firm.
During 2024, our two biggest innovations were the launch of our Enterprise AI Advisory business in January and the introduction of our AI-enabled sourcing platform, ISG Tango™, in March.
Born out of our first-mover research on the state of the AI services market in 2023, Enterprise AI is really an extension of our existing capabilities, leveraging our market influence and permission as the world’s leading sourcing and governance advisor to help clients navigate the complexities and implications of adopting this game-changing technology at scale.
ISG has worked with more than 100 clients this past year to set AI strategy, create AI-ready infrastructure and data, build AI provider ecosystems, and establish AI governance frameworks. Our ISG Research business, meanwhile, has produced detailed AI market surveys and analysis covering both the service and software provider ecosystems.
AI is also playing a role in modernizing our approach to sourcing advisory, through our groundbreaking ISG Tango sourcing platform. With ISG Tango, we have digitized elements of our market-leading sourcing transactions business to better serve clients and improve transaction speed and efficiency. The platform draws on our unmatched data assets, intellectual property and proprietary tools, powered by AI to automate contracting and provide real-time predictive insights that streamline the transaction process and accelerate time to agreement.
In 2024, we were awarded a second U.S. patent for our proprietary AI-powered contracting technology, and we have a third patent pending for a next-level solution. These patented capabilities are offered as part of our GovernX vendor compliance and risk management platform.
To sharpen our focus on our core strengths, in early October we sold our automation unit to UST for more than $20 million in cash, a move that significantly improved our balance sheet. We decided to sell the business because its growing reliance on software license sales for robotic process automation was at odds with our position as an independent, third-party advisory firm.
With our stronger cash position, we reduced our debt by $7 million in the fourth quarter, and by $20 million, or 25 percent, for the year. We also paid dividends of $9.4 million and repurchased $7.7 million of ISG shares during the year.
On an operating basis, ISG delivered revenues of $248 million, down 15 percent, due to a sluggish first half of the year. We saw an uptick in client demand in the back half of the year.
Our more predictable recurring revenue streams, meanwhile, continue to grow as a percentage of our total revenues. For the full year, recurring revenues were $118 million dollars, or 48 percent of firm revenues.
Our recurring revenues were powered by growth in our ISG Research business, with its expanded portfolio of software and technology research; in our ISG GovernX® vendor compliance and risk management business, as we added new capabilities and clients, and in our U.S. Public Sector business, as more state and local government entities turn to us to support their technology modernization initiatives through long-term contracts.
Adjusted EBITDA, though down from the prior year on lower revenues, also began to rebound in the fourth quarter, up 11 percent, with our adjusted EBITDA margin up 200 basis points. This was due to our disciplined operating approach, our higher utilization in the fourth quarter – up more than 700 basis points year over year – and our improved business mix.
RevenuesTotal revenues for the year ended December 31, 2025 decreased by $43.5$2.9 million or approximately 15%1% in 2024.2025, with revenues decreasing in Europe and Asia Pacific but increasing in the Americas. The decrease inincrease revenue in the Americas was primarily attributabledue to aan decreaseincrease in ourthe Advisory,Consulting, Network & Software Advisory Services (“NaSa”)Research, and AutomationGovernX service lines, partially offset by ana increasedecrease due to the prior year’s sale of the Automation service line and lower revenue in Researchthe Network & Software (“NaSa”) service line. The decrease in revenue in Europe was primarily attributable to athe decreaseprior inyear’s oursale Advisoryof andthe Automation service lines.line and lower revenues in the NaSa and GovernX service lines, partially offset by an increase in the Consulting service line. The revenue decrease in revenue in Asia Pacific was primarily attributable to a decrease in ourthe AdvisoryConsulting, NaSa and GovernX service line. The sale of Automation service line also attributed to the decrease in revenue in the Americas and Europe.lines. The translation of foreign currency revenues into U.S. dollars hadpositively aimpacted positive impactperformance in Europe and Asia Pacific compared to the prior year by $0.7$2.3 million.
Total operating expenses decreased by $34.6$14.9 million, or approximately 13%,6%, in 2024.2025. The decrease in operating expenses was primarily due primarily to lower contract labor of $13.7 million, compensation expenses of $10.5 million,automation license fees of $5.7 million, contingent consideration adjustmentexpense of $2.5$8.0 million, restructuring costs of $2.6 million, acquisition and disposition-related costs of $2.4 million, non-cashcompensation expense of $2.7 million, expense reversal associated with an amount that was no longer due to a sub-contractor of $1.9 million, computer expense of $0.3 million, bad debt expense of $0.2 million, and stock-based compensation of $1.1 million, professional fees of $0.7 million and travel and entertainment expenses of $0.6$0.2 million. These costs were partially offset by the prior year’s contingent consideration adjustment of $1.5 million, higher acquisition-legal reserves of $1.9 million, travel and disposition-relatedentertainment costexpense of $2.7$1.2 millionmillion, and badprofessional debt expensefees of $0.6 million.
Depreciation and amortization expenses amounted to $4.5 million in 2025 and $5.9 million in 2024 and $6.3 million in 2023,2024, respectively. The decrease of $0.4$1.4 million was primarily due to the sale of the automation business inon October 1, 2024. Our fixed assets consist of furniture, fixtures, equipment (mainly personal computers) and leasehold improvements. Depreciation expenses are generally computed by applying the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of assets. We also capitalize some costs associated with the purchase and development of internal-use software, system conversions and website development costs. These costs are amortized over the estimated useful life of the software or system.
The total decreaseincrease of $5.3$2.7 million was primarily attributable to the reduction of gain on the sale of business of $4.5$3.8 million that is related to the prior year sale of the automationAutomation business.business, and lower interest income and partially offset by lower interest expense attributable to a lower debt balance and lower interest rates.
We use non-GAAP financial measures to supplement the financial information presented on a GAAP basis. We provide adjusted EBITDA (defined as net income, plus interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, foreign currency transaction gains/losses, non-cash stock compensation, interest accretion associated with contingent consideration, taxloss indemnityon receivables,assets accountsdisposal, receivableschange reserve,in contingent consideration, acquisition and disposition-related costs, gain/loss on sale of business and severance, integration and other expense), adjusted net income (defined as net income, plus amortization of intangible assets, non-cash stock compensation, foreign currency transaction gains/losses, interest accretion associated with contingent consideration, acquisition and disposition-related costs, accountsloss receivableon reserves,assets write-offdisposal, ofchange deferredin financingcontingent costconsideration, and severance, integration,integration and other expense, gain/loss sales of business and other expense on a tax-adjusted basis) and adjusted net income per diluted share, excluding the net of tax effect of the items set forth in the table below. These are non-GAAP measures that the Company believes provide useful information to both management and investors by excluding certain expenses and financial implications of foreign currency translations that management believes are not indicative of ISG’s core operations. These non-GAAP measures are used by the Company to evaluate the Company’s business strategies and management’s performance and exclude non-cash and certain other special charges that some investors may believe obscure the user’s overall understanding of the Company’s current financial performance and the Company’s prospects for the future. We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information to investors because they improve the comparability of the financial results between periods and provide for greater transparency of key measures used to evaluate the Company’s performance.
The Company’s financial statements include outstanding borrowings of $59.2 million asat both of December 31, 20242025 and $79.2 million as of December 31, 2023,2024, which are carried at amortized cost. The fair value of debt is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the Company’s outstanding borrowings was approximately $59.6$59.5 million and $79.8$59.6 million as of December 31, 20242025 and December 31, 2023,2024, respectively. The fair values of debt have been estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on the Company’s incremental borrowing rate for similar borrowing arrangements. The incremental borrowing rate used to discount future cash flows was 6.4%5.3% and 6.9%6.4% for December 31, 20242025 and December 31, 2023,2024, respectively. The Company also considered recent transactions of peer group companies for similar instruments with comparable terms and maturities as well as an analysis of current market conditions and interest rates. In 2024,2025, the Company borrowed $28.0$15.0 million and subsequentsubsequently repaid $48.0$15.0 million of its revolving credit facility. The Company is currently in compliance with its financial covenants.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes, you should carefully consider the risks discussed in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. If any of these risks occur or continue to occur, our business, financial condition and/or operating results could be materially adversely affected. We also note that the risk factors described in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 are not the only risks facing our Company, and such additional risks or uncertainties that we currently deem to be immaterial or are unknown to us could negatively impact our business, operations and/or financial results.
No wording changes found in this section.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2026 AND JUNE 30, 2025”
New heading “Other Income (Expense), Net”
New heading “Income Tax Expense”
Removed heading “Operating Expenses”
Largest changes
“We amortize our intangible assets (e.g., client relationships and databases) over their estimated useful lives. Goodwill related to acquisitions is not amortized but is subject to annual impairment testing and interim impairment tests, if triggering events are identified.”see in full comparison
Total operating expensessee in full comparisonwereincreasedrelatively$2.7consistentmillion, or approximately 5%, for thefirstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to thefirstsecond quarter of 2025. The increase in operating expenses was primarilydrivenattributablebyto highercontractbadlabordebt expense of$0.9$4.3million,milliontravel(refer to Note 5 – Revenue – “Accounts Receivable andentertainmentContract Assets” for further details), higher compensation expense of$0.3$1.4 million, andcomputerhigher stock-based compensation expense of $0.2 million. These increases were partially offset by lowercompensationcontractor labor expense of$0.8$3.0 million,stock-based compensation expenseof$0.7whichmillion,$4.3andmillion is discussed in Note 5, lower professional fees of $0.1 million and lower restructuring costs of $0.1 million.
“RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2026 AND JUNE 30, 2025”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (33)
Our results are impacted principally by our full-time consultants’ utilization rate, the number of business days in each quarter and the number of our revenue-generating professionals who are available to work. Our utilization rate can be negatively affected by increased hiring because there is generally a transition period for new professionals that resultresults in a temporary drop in our utilization rate. Our utilization rate can also be affected by seasonal variations in the demand for our services from our clients. The number of business workdays is also affected by the number of vacation days taken by our consultants and holidays in each quarter. We typically have fewer business workdays available in the fourth quarter of the year, which can impact revenues during that period. Time-and-expense engagements do not provide us with a high degree of predictability as to performance in future periods. Unexpected changes in the demand for our services can result in significant variations in utilization and revenues and present a challenge to optimal hiring and staffing. The volume of work performed for any particular client can vary widely from period to period.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCHJUNE 31,30, 2026 AND MARCHJUNE 31,30, 2025
Revenues
Revenues increased $1.6$3.9 million, or approximately 3%,6%, in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to the firstsecond quarter of 2025. The increase in revenues in the Americas was primarily due to the increase in the Research, GovernX and Consulting service lines, partially offset by a decrease in Network & Software (“NaSa”) service line. The increase in revenues in Europe was primarily due to increases in the Consulting and Network & Software (“NaSa”) service lines. The decrease in revenues in the Americas was primarily due to the decline in theConsulting, NaSa and the ConsultingGovernX service lines, partially offset by ana increasedecrease in GovernX andthe Research service lines.line. The decrease in revenues in Asia Pacific was attributable to a decrease in the Consulting and Research service lines.line. The translation of foreign currency revenues into U.S. dollars positively impacted performance compared to the prior year by $1.8$0.7 million.
Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses wereincreased relatively$2.7 consistentmillion, or approximately 5%, for the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to the firstsecond quarter of 2025. The increase in operating expenses was primarily drivenattributable byto higher contractbad labordebt expense of $0.9$4.3 million,million travel(refer to Note 5 – Revenue – “Accounts Receivable and entertainmentContract Assets” for further details), higher compensation expense of $0.3$1.4 million, and computerhigher stock-based compensation expense of $0.2 million. These increases were partially offset by lower compensationcontractor labor expense of $0.8$3.0 million, stock-based compensation expense of $0.7which million,$4.3 andmillion is discussed in Note 5, lower professional fees of $0.1 million and lower restructuring costs of $0.1 million.
Compensation costs consist of a mix of fixed and variable salaries, annual bonuses, benefits and profit-sharing plan contributions. A portion of compensation expenses for certain billable employees areis allocated between direct costs and selling, general and administrative costs based on relative time spent between billable and non-billable activities. Bonus compensation is determined based on achievement against Company financial targets and is accrued monthly throughout the year based on management’s estimates of target achievement. Statutory and elective profit-sharing plans are offered to employees as appropriate. Direct costs also include employee taxes, health insurance, workers’ compensation and disability insurance.
Depreciation and amortization expenses were $1.0$1.1 million and $1.1$1.2 million for the firstsecond quarters of 2026 and 2025, respectively. Our fixed assets consist of furniture, fixtures, equipment (mainly personal computers) and leasehold improvements. Depreciation expense is generally computed by applying the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of assets. We also capitalize certain costs associated with the purchase and development of internal-use software, system conversions and website development costs. These costs are amortized over the estimated useful life of the software or system.
The total decrease in other expenses of $0.3$0.5 million, or approximately 30%44%, in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 compared to the firstsecond quarter of 2025, was primarily due to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and lower interest expense attributable to lower interest rates, and fluctuations in foreign exchange rates.
Our quarterly effective tax rate varies from period to period based on the mix of our earnings among the various state and foreign tax jurisdictions in which our business is conducted and the level of non-deductible expenses projected to be incurred during the current fiscal year. Our effective tax rate for the quarter ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was 37.2%37.1% compared to 37.9%38.7% for the quarter ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The difference for the quarter ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was primarily due to the impact of an increase in pre-tax earnings.earnings as well as the mix of earnings as discussed above. The Company also wrote off a receivable in Europe which was recognized as a discrete event in the quarter. The Company’s effective tax rate for the quarter ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was higher than the statutory rate primarily due to non-deductible expenses and the impact of earnings in foreign jurisdictions. There were no significant changes in uncertain tax position reserves during the quarter ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2026 AND JUNE 30, 2025
The following table presents a breakdown of our revenue by geographic area:
Revenues increased $5.5 million, or approximately 5%, for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase in the Americas was primarily attributable to an increase in the Research and GovernX service lines, partially offset by a decrease in the Consulting and the NaSa service lines. The increase in revenue in Europe was primarily attributable to an increase in Consulting and NaSa service lines. The revenue decrease in Asia Pacific was primarily attributable to a decrease in our Research, Consulting, and GovernX service lines. The translation of foreign currency revenues into U.S. dollars positively impacted performance in Europe and Asia Pacific compared to the prior year by $2.5 million.
The following table presents a breakdown of our operating expenses by category:
Total operating expenses increased $2.7 million, or approximately 2%, for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase in operating expenses was primarily attributable to higher bad debt expense of $4.3 million (refer to Note 5 – Revenue – “Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets” for further details), compensation expense of $0.6 million, travel and entertainment expenses of $0.4 million, and computer expenses of $0.3 million. These increases were partially offset by lower contractor labor expense of $2.1 million, of which $4.3 million is discussed in Note 5, lower stock-based compensation expense of $0.5 million and lower deal cost of $0.1 million.
Compensation costs consist of a mix of fixed and variable salaries, annual bonuses, benefits and profit-sharing plan contributions. A portion of compensation expenses for certain billable employees is allocated between direct costs and selling, general and administrative costs based on relative time spent between billable and non-billable activities. Bonus compensation is determined based on achievement against Company financial targets and is accrued monthly throughout the year based on management’s estimates of target achievement. Statutory and elective profit-sharing plans are offered to employees as appropriate. Direct costs also include employee taxes, health insurance, workers’ compensation and disability insurance.
Sales and marketing costs consist principally of compensation expenses related to business development, proposal preparation and delivery and negotiation of new client contracts. Costs also include travel expenses relating to the pursuit of sales opportunities, expenses for hosting periodic client conferences, public relations activities, participation in industry conferences, industry relations, website maintenance and business intelligence activities. The Company maintains a dedicated global marketing function responsible for developing and managing sales campaigns, brand promotion, the ISG Index and assembling proposals.
We maintain a comprehensive program for training and professional development. Related expenses include product training, updates on new service offerings or methodologies and development of project management skills. Also included in training and professional development are expenses associated with the development, enhancement and maintenance of our proprietary methodologies and tools and the systems that support them.
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist principally of executive management compensation, allocations of billable employee compensation related to general management activities, IT infrastructure and costs for finance, accounting, information technology and human resource functions. General and administrative costs also reflect continued investment associated with implementing and operating client and employee management systems. Because our billable personnel operate primarily on client premises or work remotely, all occupancy expenses are recorded as general and administrative.
Depreciation and amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and June 30, 2025 was $2.1 million and $2.3 million, respectively. Our fixed assets consist of furniture, fixtures, equipment (mainly personal computers) and leasehold improvements. Depreciation expense is generally computed by applying the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of assets. We also capitalize certain costs associated with the purchase and development of internal-use software, system conversions and website development costs. These costs are amortized over the estimated useful life of the software or system.
We amortize our intangible assets (e.g., client relationships and databases) over their estimated useful lives. Goodwill related to acquisitions is not amortized but is subject to annual impairment testing and interim impairment tests, if triggering events are identified.
Other Income (Expense), Net
The following table presents a breakdown of other income (expense), net:
The total decrease in other expenses of $0.8 million, or approximately 38%, for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025, was primarily the result of fluctuations in foreign currency and lower interest expense attributable to lower interest rates.
Income Tax Expense
Our six months effective tax rate varies from period to period based on the mix of our earnings among the various state and foreign tax jurisdictions in which our business is conducted and the level of non-deductible expenses projected to be incurred during the current fiscal year. Our effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was 37.1% compared to 38.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The difference for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was primarily due to the impact of an increase in pre-tax earnings as well as the mix of earnings discussed above. The Company also wrote off a receivable in Europe which was recognized as a discrete event in the quarter. The Company’s effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was higher than the statutory rate primarily due to non-deductible expenses and the impact of earnings in foreign jurisdictions. There were no significant changes in uncertain tax position reserves or valuation allowances during the six months ended June 30, 2026.
We use non-GAAP financial measures to supplement the financial information presented on a GAAP basis. We provide adjusted EBITDA (defined as net income plus interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, foreign currency transaction gains/losses, non-cash stock compensation, interest accretion associated with contingent consideration, acquisition and disposition-related costs, gain/loss on assetsasset disposaldisposal, and severance, integration and other expense), adjusted net income (defined as net income plus amortization of intangible assets, non-cash stock compensation, foreign currency transaction gains/losses, interest accretion associated with contingent consideration, acquisition and disposition-related costs, gain/loss on assetsasset disposaldisposal, and severance, integration and other expense, on a tax-adjusted basis) and adjusted net income per diluted share, excluding the net tax effect of the items set forth in the table below. These are non-GAAP measures that the Company believes provide useful information to both management and investors by excluding certain expenses and financial implications of foreign currency translations that management believes are not indicative of ISG’s core operations. These non-GAAP measures are used by the Company to evaluate the Company’s business strategies and management’s performance. However, they are not measurements of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to measures of performance derived in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures exclude non-cash and certain other special charges that some investors believe may obscure the user’s overall understanding of the Company’s current financial performance and the Company’s prospects for the future. We believe that these non-GAAP measures provide useful information to investors because they improve the comparability of the financial results between periods and provide for greater transparency of key measures used to evaluate the Company’s performance. Non-GAAP financial measures should be considered as a supplement to, and not as a substitute for, or superior to, the respective financial results presented in accordance with GAAP.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, our cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash totaled $22.8$23.8 million compared to $28.8 million as of December 31, 2025, a net decrease of $6.0$5.0 million, which was primarily attributable to the following:
The Company’s financial statements include outstanding borrowings of $59.2 million at both MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, which are carried at amortized cost. The fair value of debt is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the Company’s outstanding borrowings was approximately $59.5 million at both MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively.2025. The fair values of debt have been estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on the Company’s incremental borrowing rate for similar borrowing arrangements. The incremental borrowing rate used to discount future cash flows was 5.3% at both MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively.2025. The Company also considered recent transactions of peer group companies for similar instruments with comparable terms and maturities as well as an analysis of current market conditions and interest rates. During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company borrowed $20.0 million and subsequently repaid $20.0 million of the outstanding balance on its revolving credit.credit facility. The Company is currently in compliance with its financial covenants.
On March 3, 2026, the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) approved a first-quarter dividend of $0.045 per share, which was paid on March 26, 2026, to shareholders of record as of March 20, 2026 .
On May 5, 2026, the Board approved a second-quarter dividend of $0.045 per share, payablepaid on June 26, 2026, to shareholders of record as of June 5, 2026.
On August 4, 2026, the Board approved a third-quarter dividend of $0.045 per share, payable September 25, 2026, to shareholders of record as of September 4, 2026.
See Note 3—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.
III insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-01 | Sherrick Michael A. |
Shares withheld for tax | 66,996 | $5.06 | $339.0K |
| 2026-08-18 | Kucinski Thomas S. |
Shares withheld for tax | 4,197 | $4.93 | $20.7K |
| 2026-08-18 | Kucinski Thomas S. |
Option exercise | 7,764 | — | — |
| 2026-08-18 | Lavieri Todd D. |
Shares withheld for tax | 11,481 | $4.93 | $56.6K |
| 2026-08-18 | Lavieri Todd D. |
Option exercise | 25,880 | — | — |
| 2026-08-18 | Sherrick Michael A. |
Shares withheld for tax | 10,754 | $4.93 | $53.0K |
| 2026-08-18 | Sherrick Michael A. |
Option exercise | 18,116 | — | — |
| 2026-06-01 | Sherrick Michael A. |
Shares withheld for tax | 20,426 | $4.51 | $92.1K |
| 2026-06-01 | Lavieri Todd D. |
Shares withheld for tax | 35,575 | $4.51 | $160.4K |
| 2026-06-01 | Kucinski Thomas S. |
Shares withheld for tax | 12,419 | $4.51 | $56.0K |
| 2026-06-01 | Connors Michael P |
Shares withheld for tax | 56,651 | $4.51 | $255.5K |
Well-known investors holding III (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 1,863,237 | $7.7M | 0.01% | Reduced 1% |
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 388,980 | $1.6M | 0.0% | Added 28% |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 146,282 | $601.2K | 0.0% | Reduced 33% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 74,311 | $305.4K | 0.0% | Added 294% |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 47,411 | $182.1K | — | Sold out |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 39,077 | $150.1K | — | Sold out |