IMO 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Imperial Oil Ltd. · NYSE · Petroleum Refining · CIK 49938 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Reliance upon third-party suppliers, service providers and ExxonMobil global capability centres”
New heading “Operating costs and inflation”
Largest changes
“Government actions intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions include adoption of carbon emissions pricing, cap and trade regimes, carbon taxes, emissions limits, increased mileage and other efficiency standards, low carbon fuels standards, mandates for sales of electrical vehicles, restrictions on sales of gasoline-only vehicles, mandates for disclosure of plans to reduce emissions or reduce the use or production of certain products, mandates for use of specific fuels or technologies, and other incentives or mandates designed to support certain technologies for transitioning to …”see in full comparison
see in full comparisonInternational accords and underlying regional and national regulations covering climate change and greenhouse gas emissions continue to evolve with uncertain timing and outcome, making it difficult to predict their business impact. Such laws and policies could make Imperial’s products more expensive and less competitive, reduce or delay available business opportunities, reduce demand for hydrocarbons, and shift hydrocarbon demand toward lower greenhouse gas emission energy sources. Current and pending greenhouse gas regulations or policies may also increase compliance costs (such as complying with increased or mandatory disclosure or due diligence requirements and government mandated energy transition plans), increase abatement costs including taxes and levies, increase abandonment and reclamation obligations and impact decommissioning timelines, lengthen project evaluation and implementation times, impact reserves evaluations and affect operations. Increased costs may not be recoverable in the market place, could negatively affect the company's returns and could reduce the global competitiveness of the company’s crude oil, natural gas and refined products.Governments may also impose restrictions on production of, or emissions from, oil and gas and electricity to the extent they view such measures as a viable approach for pursuing national and global energy and climate policies. For example, following the publication of a regulatory framework in December 2023, in November20242024, the Government of Canada released proposed regulations that will impose a cap on greenhouse gas emissions from upstream oil and gas activities by 2030, and in December 2024 the Government of Canada released final Clean Electricity Regulations that will require reductions in the carbon intensity of electricity provided to the grid between 2035 and 2050. Although the Government of Canada and Government of Alberta entered into a Memorandum of Understanding in November 2025, under which the Government of Canada committed to not implement the oil and gas emissions cap and to suspend the Clean Electricity Regulations in Alberta pending a new carbon pricing agreement with Alberta to be negotiated in 2026, many details remain to be determined and uncertainty about the future of these policies remains. Concern over the risks of climate change may lead governments to make laws applicable to the energy industry progressively more stringent over time. Politicalandactors,othernon-governmentalactorsorganizations,(and their agents) arealsoincreasingly seekingseek to collectively advance climate change objectives indirectly, such as by seeking to reduce the availability or increase the cost of financing and investment in the oil and gas sector. These actions include delaying or blocking needed infrastructure, utilizing shareholder governance mechanisms against companies or their shareholders or financial institutions in an effort to deter investments in oil and gas activities, and taking other actions intended to promote changes in business strategy for oil and gas companies.
The company may also be adversely affected by the outcome ofsee in full comparisonlitigationlitigation, including class actions orarbitrationarbitrations,resultingandfrombyitsgovernmentoperations,investigationsincludingorbut not limited to proceedingsenforcement, in respect of greenhouse gasemissions andemissions, the promotion of the company’s products, orby government enforcement proceedings allegingalleged non-compliance with applicable laws or regulations. Such proceedings are subject to uncertainty and success is not guaranteed, and the company may incur significant expenses and devote significant resources in defending such proceedings.
Commodity prices and margins also vary depending on a number of factors affecting supply. For example, increased supply from the development of new or previously inaccessible oil and gas supply sources and technologies to enhance recovery from existing sources tends to reduce commodity prices to the extent such supply increases are not offset by commensurate growth in demand. Similarly, increases in industry refining or petrochemical manufacturing capacity relative to demand tend to reduce margins on affected products. Crude oil, gas and petrochemical supply levels can also be affected by factors that reduce available supplies, such as the level of and adherence by participating countries or others to production quotas established by OPEC or "OPEC+" and other agreements among sovereigns; government policies that restrict (or may have a consequence of restricting) oil and gas production or exports, or increase associated production, reporting or compliance costs, including actions intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions as described under “Climate change, energy transition and greenhouse gas restrictions” in this Item 1A, and previous Government of Alberta curtailment regulations; collective actions by non-governmental organizations and financial institutions to withhold funding or support from oil and gas producers; the occurrence of wars or hostile actions, including disruption of land or sea transportation routes; natural disasters; trade tariffs, sanctions or broader breakdowns in global trade; disruptions in competitors’ operations; and unexpected pipeline or rail constraints that may disrupt and have in the past disrupted supplies. For example, Russia's military action in Ukraine impacted global crude oil and gas supply levels and prices, and contributed to a volatile commoditysee in full comparisonenvironment;environment. There also may be new or emerging factors that could increase global oil, gas, andthepetrochemicalpotentialsupplyforlevelstrade tariffs byin theUnitedshortStatesoronlongCanadianterm,goodssuch as government policies andpotential retaliatoryactionsbyintendedCanadianto boost orprovincialexpandgovernmentsdevelopmentcouldofimpactdomesticmarketorpricesforeign oil anddemandgas reserves or accelerate the pace of production reaching the market, including access to previously unavailable, sanctioned, or protected oil and gas resources or the availability or opening of new shipping routes. Dynamic and unpredictable world events may lead to new oil and gas opportunities becoming available or current opportunities becoming less available or unavailable, and such events may adversely affect the company’s business and results to the extent that the company is unable to compete effectively for,andorexportisvolumesexcludedof,from,Canadiansuchgoods.opportunities or any new or existing investments result in reduced returns. Technological change can also alter the relative costs for competitors to find, produce, and refine oil and gas and to manufacture petrochemicals.
“Disruptions to or realignment or breaking of current or historical trade alliances or agreements or global trade and supply chain networks, changes in international trade patterns or shipping routes, or a broader breakdown in global trade, pose risks. During 2025, the United States announced a variety of trade-related actions, including the imposition of tariffs on imports from Canada and other countries. In response, Canada announced its own retaliatory tariffs. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (34)
The oil, gas, fuels and petrochemical businesses are fundamentally commodity businesses. This means the company’s operations and earnings may be significantly affected by changes in oil, natural gas and petrochemical prices, and by changes in margins on refined products and petrochemicals. Crude oil, natural gas, petrochemical and petroleum product prices and margins depend on local, regional, and global events or conditions that affect supply and demand for the relevant commodity or product. Commodity prices have been volatile, and the company expects that volatility to continue during the lifespan of its major assets. Any material decline in crude oil prices could have a material adverse effect on the company’s Upstream operations, results, financial position, proved reserves and the amount spent to develop reserves. On the other hand, a material increase in crude oil prices could have a material adverse effect on the company's Downstream margins, depending on the market conditions for refined products. The company's pursuit of lower-emission business opportunities including carbon capture and storage, hydrogen, lower-emission fuels, and lithium also depends on the growth and development of markets for those products and services, including implementation of supportive and stable government policies and developments in technology to enable those products and services to be provided on a cost-effective basis at commercial scale. See "Climate change, energy transition and greenhouse gas restrictions" in this Item 1A. The company may also be impacted by changes in other commodities the company utilizes, such as prices and availability of feedstocks for lower-emission fuels including renewable diesel.
The demand for energy and petrochemicals is generally linked closely with broad-based economic activities and levels of prosperity. The occurrence of economic downturns, recessions or other periods of low or negative economic growth will typically have a direct adverse impact on the company’s results. Other factors that affect general economic conditions, such as changes in population growth rates,rates or living standards, government regulation or austerity programs, national or regional trade tariffs, trade sanctions or trade controls, international monetary and currency exchange rate fluctuations, decoupling of economies, disruptions in trade alliancesto or realignment or breaking of current or historical military alliances, or a broader breakdown in global trade, security or public health issues and responses, extended government shutdowns, the inability to access debt markets due to rating, banking, or legal constraints, liquidity crises, market bubbles and corrections, de-dollarization in global trade or the growth or use of alternative common currencies, and other events or conditions that impair the functioning of financial markets and institutions, also pose risks to the company, including risks to the safety of the company’s financial assets and to the ability of the company’s partners, suppliers and customers to fulfill their commitments to the company.
Disruptions to or realignment or breaking of current or historical trade alliances or agreements or global trade and supply chain networks, changes in international trade patterns or shipping routes, or a broader breakdown in global trade, pose risks. During 2025, the United States announced a variety of trade-related actions, including the imposition of tariffs on imports from Canada and other countries. In response, Canada announced its own retaliatory tariffs. The United States and Canada have continued to discuss a potential end to or reduction in such tariffs, but the full impact and duration of such tariffs is uncertain. Furthermore, there remains a possibility of further escalation in the trade dispute, and there is uncertainty regarding the future status of existing international trade agreements to which Canada is a party, including the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. Although the impact of such actions on Imperial and its partners, suppliers and customers is uncertain, such actions could depress economic activity, reduce demand for the company’s products, limit or disrupt supply chains, increase costs, reduce market prices and export volumes of the company’s products, or otherwise have a material adverse effect on the company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Factors that may affect the demand for crude oil, gas, fuels and petrochemicals, and therefore could impact the company’s results, include technological improvements in energy efficiency; seasonal weather patterns, which affect the demand for the company's products, including lower demand for gasoline, impacting Downstream results in the winterpatterns; increased competitiveness of, or government policy support for, alternative energy sources or potential substitutes for the company's products; new product quality regulations; technological changes or consumer preferences that alter fuel choices, such as technological advances in energy storage or other critical areas that make wind, solar, nuclear or other alternatives more competitive for power generation; government actions to increase strategic reserves to enhance energy security; increased demand for artificial intelligence, including the construction and expansion of artificial intelligence data centers; changes in customer or consumer preferences for the company’s products, including consumer demand for alternative fuel or electric transportation or alternatives to plastic products; broad-based changes in personal income levels, interest rates and inflation; and security or public health issues and responses such as epidemics and pandemics. See also "Climate change, energy transition and greenhouse gas restrictions" in this Item 1A below.
Commodity prices and margins also vary depending on a number of factors affecting supply. For example, increased supply from the development of new or previously inaccessible oil and gas supply sources and technologies to enhance recovery from existing sources tends to reduce commodity prices to the extent such supply increases are not offset by commensurate growth in demand. Similarly, increases in industry refining or petrochemical manufacturing capacity relative to demand tend to reduce margins on affected products. Crude oil, gas and petrochemical supply levels can also be affected by factors that reduce available supplies, such as the level of and adherence by participating countries or others to production quotas established by OPEC or "OPEC+" and other agreements among sovereigns; government policies that restrict (or may have a consequence of restricting) oil and gas production or exports, or increase associated production, reporting or compliance costs, including actions intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions as described under “Climate change, energy transition and greenhouse gas restrictions” in this Item 1A, and previous Government of Alberta curtailment regulations; collective actions by non-governmental organizations and financial institutions to withhold funding or support from oil and gas producers; the occurrence of wars or hostile actions, including disruption of land or sea transportation routes; natural disasters; trade tariffs, sanctions or broader breakdowns in global trade; disruptions in competitors’ operations; and unexpected pipeline or rail constraints that may disrupt and have in the past disrupted supplies. For example, Russia's military action in Ukraine impacted global crude oil and gas supply levels and prices, and contributed to a volatile commodity environment;environment. There also may be new or emerging factors that could increase global oil, gas, and thepetrochemical potentialsupply forlevels trade tariffs byin the Unitedshort Statesor onlong Canadianterm, goodssuch as government policies and potential retaliatory actions byintended Canadianto boost or provincialexpand governmentsdevelopment couldof impactdomestic marketor pricesforeign oil and demandgas reserves or accelerate the pace of production reaching the market, including access to previously unavailable, sanctioned, or protected oil and gas resources or the availability or opening of new shipping routes. Dynamic and unpredictable world events may lead to new oil and gas opportunities becoming available or current opportunities becoming less available or unavailable, and such events may adversely affect the company’s business and results to the extent that the company is unable to compete effectively for, andor exportis volumesexcluded of,from, Canadiansuch goods.opportunities or any new or existing investments result in reduced returns. Technological change can also alter the relative costs for competitors to find, produce, and refine oil and gas and to manufacture petrochemicals.
The market price for western Canadian heavy crude oil is typically lower than light and medium grades of oil, principally due to the higher transportation and refining costs. Western Canadian crude oil may also be subject to limits on transportation capacity to markets. Future crude price differentials between western Canadian crude oil relative to prices in the U.S. Gulf Coast are uncertain and changes in the heavy or light crude oil differentials could have a material adverse effect on the company’s business. InFor example, the United States government has indicated it may reduce trade sanctions on Venezuela and take certain steps intended to increase the volume of crude oil produced in Venezuela, and either of these actions could adversely impact western Canadian crude oil price differentials compared to the U.S. Gulf Coast and therefore the company’s business. Additionally, in the past, increased differentials have led the Government of Alberta to enact temporary mandatory production curtailment regulations that imposed production limits on large producers in Alberta, such as Imperial.Imperial; Althoughalthough the regulatory authority to impose curtailments was repealed at the end of 2021, the use of similar curtailment regulations in the future could have an adverse effect on the company’s business. A significant portion of the company’s production is bitumen, which is blended with diluent for transportation and marketability of heavy crude oil. Increases to diluent prices, relative to heavy crude oil prices, could also have an adverse effect on the company’s business.
Market factors may also result in losses from commodity derivatives and other instruments used to hedge price exposures or for commodity and treasury trading purposes.activities. Imperial’s future business results, including cash flows and financing needs, may also be affected by the occurrence, severity, pace and rate of recovery of future public health epidemics or pandemics, the responsive actions taken by governments and others, and the resulting effects on regional and global markets and economies. If the company’s mitigation and response efforts prove insufficient, then large outbreaks of epidemics, pandemics or other health crises at operating sites, particularly in remote locations and where work camps are utilized, could materially impact the company’s personnel and its operations, reducing productivity and increasing costs.
Imperial’s results can be adversely impacted by political, legal or regulatory developments affecting operations and markets. Changes in government policy or regulations, changes in law or interpretation of settled law, challenges to legislative jurisdiction between different levels of government, third-party opposition to company or infrastructure projects, and duration of regulatory reviews could impact the company’s existing operations and planned projects. This includes actions by governments, policy makers, regulators or other actors to delay or deny necessary licences and permits,permits; pause, reduce or retract government incentives for emissions reductions,reductions; disrupt or impact reliability as a result of policy decisions on types and pricing of energy available; or restrict the availability of oil and gas leasesleases, investment opportunities or the operation of third-party infrastructure thaton which the company relies on,relies, such as pipelines to transport the company’s upstreamUpstream production to market or that supply feedstock to the company’s refineries. Additionally, changes in environmental regulations, assessment processes or other laws (including but not limited to in respect of climate change and greenhouse gas emissions and company communications relating thereto), regulatory interpretations that exclude or disfavour the company's products under government policies or programs intended to support new or developing markets or technologies or that are otherwise not technology-neutral, and increasing and expanding consultation with stakeholders and Indigenous communities, may increase the cost of compliance or reduce or delay available business opportunities and adversely impact the company’s results.
Other government and political factors that could adversely affect the company’s financial results include increases or changes in taxes or government royalty rates (including retroactive claims or punitive taxes on oil, gas and petrochemical operations) and changes in trade policies and agreements (including those potential tariffs and retaliatory actions discussed above in this Item 1A under “OtherEconomic supply-related factorsconditions”). Changes in taxation policy, such as the Government of Canada's tax on repurchases of equity that became effective from January 1, 2024,policy could impact the company’s financial results and ability to return surplus cash to shareholders. Further, the adoption of regulations mandating efficiency standards, emission standardsstandards, procurement standards, or the use of alternative fuels or uncompetitive fuel components, could affect the company’s operations. Many governments are providing tax advantages and other subsidies to support alternative energy sources or are mandating the use of specific fuels or technologies. Governments are also introducing bans on certain technologies that could impact demand for products, such as the Government of Canada’s regulations to gradually reduce the proportion of permitted sales of new internal combustion engine cars and light trucks from 2026-2034 and ban such sales beginning in 2035. Governments and others are also promoting research into new technologies to reduce the cost and increase the scalability of alternative energy sources, and the success of these initiatives may decrease demand for the company’s products. Actions by policy makers, regulators or others may require changes in the company’s business or strategy that could result in reduced returns.
The implementation of, and compliance with, policies and regulations related to air, water and land, such as Alberta’s Lower Athabasca Regional Plan and Wetland Policy applicable to the company’s oil sands assets, could restrict development in current and future areas of operation. Of note, there are currently a number of court actions against the government by Indigenous groups regarding the assessment of cumulative impacts and infringement on exercise of treaty rights. These cases may inform future government decisions and policies regarding land use planning and resource development, and could impact the requirements or willingness to grant regulatory licenses or approvals. The company also depends on water obtained under licences for withdrawal, storage, reuse and discharge in both its Upstream and Downstream businesses, including future projects and expansions. Water use may be limited by regulatory requirements, seasonal fluctuations, regional drought, competing demands, environmental sensitivities, increasingly stringent water management standards, and changes to conditions or availability of licences, which may restrict and adversely affect the company’s operations. Additionally, a number of air quality regulations and frameworks are being developed or have been implemented at the federal and provincial levels, including sulphur dioxide limits for refineries in Ontario, and volatile organic compounds (VOC) and benzene controls required for petroleum liquid storage tanks and loading operations at refining and terminal locations, and could impact existing and planned operations and projects through increased capital and operating expenses including retrofits to existing equipment, and could adversely impact the company’s operations and financial results.
The costs of complying with environmental legislation in the future could have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial condition or results of operations. The company anticipates that changes in environmental legislation may require, among other things, reductions in emissions from its operations to the air and water and may result in increased capital expenditures. Changes in environmental legislation (including, but not limited to, application of regulations related to air, water, land, biodiversity and waste, such as mine tailings and the production or use of new or recycled plastics, as well as laws and regulations affecting production of the company's products, trading, carbon capture and storage, hydrogen, lower-emission fuels or lithium) or changes in advertising, insurance or other laws that penalize the company for past or current production of legal and/or permitted products and operations may increase the cost of operation or compliance or reduce or delay available business opportunities. Future changes in environmental legislation and the enforcement of regulations could occur and result in stricter standards and enforcement, larger fines, penalties and liability, and increased capital expenditures and operating costs, which could have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial condition or results of operations.
There are operational risks inherent in oil and gas exploration and production activities, as well as the potential to incur substantial financial liabilities, if the company does not manage those risks effectively. Environmental hazards and risks, including severe weather, drought, forest fires and geological events, may impact the company’s operational performance. For example, the company's oil sands operations werehave in the past been particularly affected by extreme cold or wet weather in 2022 and wildfires in 2016.wildfires. The ability to insure risks is limited by the capacity of the applicable insurance markets, which may not be sufficient to cover the likely cost of a major adverse operating event. Accordingly, the company’s primary focus is on prevention, including through its rigorous operations integrity management system. The company’s future results will depend on the continued effectiveness of these efforts. See also “"Safety, business controls and environmental risk management”" under “"Operational and other factors”" in this Item 1A below.
Driven by concern over the risks of climate change, the provinces and the Government of Canada have adopted or have revised regulatory frameworks to report on or reduce greenhouse gas emissions including emissions from the production and use of oil and gas and their products, as well as increase the use of or support for different emission-reduction technologies. These actions are being taken both independently by national and regional governments and within the framework of United Nations Conference of the Parties’ summits under which Canada has endorsed objectives to reduce the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) over the coming decades, with an ambition ultimately to achieve "net zero". Net zero means that emissions of greenhouse gases from human activities would be balanced by actions that remove such gases from the atmosphere. Expectations for transition of the world’s energy system to lower-emission sources, and ultimately net zero, derive from hypothetical scenarios that reflect many assumptions about the future (including supportive policy and technology advancements) and reflect substantial uncertainties. The company’s actions with respect to the energy transition carry risks that the transition, including underlying technologies, government policies, and markets as discussed in more detail below, will not be available or develop at the pace or in the manner estimated by current net-zero scenarios. The success of Imperial's strategy for the energy transition will also depend on its ability to recognize key signposts of changes in the global energy system on a timely basis, and the corresponding ability to direct investment to the technologies and businesses, at the appropriate stage of development, to best capitalize on the company's competitive strengths. Imperial’sThe company’s results may be impacted if the implementation pace and uncertainty of policy reduces the global competitiveness of the Canadian oil and gas industry and the company’s crude oil and refined products. Political government changes may create further policy uncertainty resulting in greater investment uncertainty and industry competitiveness concerns.
Government actions intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions include adoption of carbon emissions pricing, cap and trade regimes, carbon taxes, emissions limits, increased mileage and other efficiency standards, low carbon fuels standards, mandates for sales of electrical vehicles, restrictions on sales of gasoline-only vehicles, mandates for disclosure of plans to reduce emissions or reduce the use or production of certain products, mandates for use of specific fuels or technologies, and other incentives or mandates designed to support certain technologies for transitioning to lower-emission energy sources. International accords and underlying regional and national regulations covering climate change and greenhouse gas emissions continue to evolve with uncertain timing and outcome, making it difficult to predict their business impact. Such laws and policies could make the company's products more expensive or less competitive, reduce or delay available business opportunities, reduce demand for hydrocarbons, and shift hydrocarbon demand toward lower greenhouse gas emission energy sources. Current, pending and potential greenhouse gas regulations or policies may also increase compliance costs (such as complying with increased or mandatory disclosure or due diligence requirements and government mandated energy transition plans), increase abatement costs including taxes and levies, increase abandonment and reclamation obligations and impact decommissioning timelines, lengthen project evaluation and implementation times, impact reserves evaluations and affect operations. Increased costs may not be recoverable in the marketplace, could negatively affect the company's returns and could reduce the global competitiveness of the company’s crude oil, natural gas and refined products.
GovernmentIn actions2024, intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions include adoption of carbon emissions pricing, cap and trade regimes, carbon taxes, emissions limits, increased mileage and other efficiency standards, low carbon fuels standards, mandates for sales of electrical vehicles, restrictions on sales of gasoline-only vehicles, and other incentives or mandates designed to support certain technologies for transitioning to lower-emission energy sources. Thethe Government of Canada has updated its nationally determined contribution (NDC) under the Paris Agreement on climate change, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions economy-wide by 45 to 50 percent below 2005 levels by 2035, a substantial increase in ambition beyond its original and most recentprior NDC. To implement these goals, the Government of Canada uses a number of policy tools including the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act (GGPPA), which sets a federal backstop carbon price Canada-wide through a carbon levy applied to fossil fuels ($50 per tonne CO2 equivalent emissions starting in 2022 and increasing by $15 per tonne annually to $170 per tonne in 2030), and an output-based pricing system for large industrial emitters. Under the GGPPA, provinces are required to either adopt the GGPPA, or obtain equivalency by adopting a price-based system (with a minimum of the federal carbon pricing) or a cap and trade system. Further, in 2021 the Government of Canada enacted legislation to formalize Canada’s target to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050 and establish interim emissions reductions targets at five year intervals. Under the Canadian Net-Zero Emissions Accountability Act, the Government of Canada is required to develop an emissions reduction plan for 2030 consistent with achieving net-zero emissions by 2050, and additional sector specific regulations may be developed to achieve this target. Under a November 2025 Memorandum of Understanding between the Government of Canada and the Government of Alberta, Canada and Alberta both confirmed they remain committed to achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.
The Government of Alberta obtained federal equivalency for its Technology Innovation and Emissions Reduction Regulation (TIER) that came into effect in 2020 and applies to facilities with CO2 emissions in excess of 100,000 tonnes per year. TIER is designed to reduce emissions by putting a price on nominallya 10nominal percentpercentage of a facility’s emissionsemissions, which percentage increases annually in 2020. This percentage of priced emissions increased nominally to 11 percent in 2021 and 12 percent in 2022,accordance with theTIER (for oil sands mining and upgrading facilitiesfacilities, increasingthe percentage has increased from 20% for 2020 to 1726% percentfor in 2021, 18 percent in 20222026, and 20is percentto incontinue 2023. These percentagesto increase to 38% by 22030 percentunder percurrent yearregulations). In a November 2025 Memorandum of Understanding, the Government of Canada and the Government of Alberta committed to work collaboratively to design and commit to globally competitive, long-term carbon effective prices, carbon levy recycling protocols, and sector-specific stringency factors for 2024Alberta to 2028 (inclusive), followed by an increase of 4 percentemitters in 2029 and 2030 for the oil sandsand sector.gas and electricity sectors through Alberta’s TIER system, which will ramp up to a minimum effective credit price of $130 per tonne, although the date for introduction of the effective price and the rate of price increases over time remain to be determined. In December 2025, the Government of Alberta introduced a compliance pathway under TIER allowing facilities to earn compliance credits though investments in approved emissions-reduction projects in Alberta. Further, the Alberta Oil Sands Emissions Limit Act sets a limit of 100 megatonnes of CO2 per year of emissions in the oil sands sector, but oil sands emissions remain below the limit and it is not yet possible to predict the impact of this act on the company’s future oil sands operations in Alberta. With respect to other provinces, Ontario obtained federal equivalency for its Emissions Performance System, which put a price on 8 percent of a facility’s emissions in 2022. The price increased by 2.4 percent in 2023 and 1.5 percent in 2024, and will increase by 1.5 percent per year thereafter. British Columbia has carbon pricing in place for all industrial emissions, with pricing that matches the federal carbon pricing schedule since 2022. Increases in carbon pricing could adversely impact the company’s operations and financial results unless the company can adapt its operations through technological innovation and investment in a cost-effective manner or meet compliance through offset credits or other mechanisms.
There are also various renewable and low carbon fuel standards being developed or already applicable to the company’s products. In 2022, the Government of Canada finalized the Clean Fuel Regulations, which require the reduction in carbon intensity of liquid transportation fuels supplied in Canada starting in July 2023. The regulations require fuel suppliers to reduce the carbon intensity of gasoline and diesel by reducing the GHG emissions within the fossil fuel life cycle, blending in low carbon intensity renewables or fuel switching away from fossil fuels. Similarly, British Columbia introduced a Low Carbon Fuel Standard in 2013, which increased to a 10 percent carbon intensity reduction requirement in 2020. Beginning in 2023, the British Columbia government has further increased the carbon intensity reductions to a total of 30 percent by 2030 (compared to the 2010 baseline). Compliance can be achieved by either blending renewable fuels with low carbon intensity or by purchasing credits. In 2025, both Ontario and British Columbia introduced domestic (Canadian) renewable fuel content requirements into their provincial fuel regulations.
International accords and underlying regional and national regulations covering climate change and greenhouse gas emissions continue to evolve with uncertain timing and outcome, making it difficult to predict their business impact. Such laws and policies could make Imperial’s products more expensive and less competitive, reduce or delay available business opportunities, reduce demand for hydrocarbons, and shift hydrocarbon demand toward lower greenhouse gas emission energy sources. Current and pending greenhouse gas regulations or policies may also increase compliance costs (such as complying with increased or mandatory disclosure or due diligence requirements and government mandated energy transition plans), increase abatement costs including taxes and levies, increase abandonment and reclamation obligations and impact decommissioning timelines, lengthen project evaluation and implementation times, impact reserves evaluations and affect operations. Increased costs may not be recoverable in the market place, could negatively affect the company's returns and could reduce the global competitiveness of the company’s crude oil, natural gas and refined products. Governments may also impose restrictions on production of, or emissions from, oil and gas and electricity to the extent they view such measures as a viable approach for pursuing national and global energy and climate policies. For example, following the publication of a regulatory framework in December 2023, in November 20242024, the Government of Canada released proposed regulations that will impose a cap on greenhouse gas emissions from upstream oil and gas activities by 2030, and in December 2024 the Government of Canada released final Clean Electricity Regulations that will require reductions in the carbon intensity of electricity provided to the grid between 2035 and 2050. Although the Government of Canada and Government of Alberta entered into a Memorandum of Understanding in November 2025, under which the Government of Canada committed to not implement the oil and gas emissions cap and to suspend the Clean Electricity Regulations in Alberta pending a new carbon pricing agreement with Alberta to be negotiated in 2026, many details remain to be determined and uncertainty about the future of these policies remains. Concern over the risks of climate change may lead governments to make laws applicable to the energy industry progressively more stringent over time. Political andactors, othernon-governmental actorsorganizations, (and their agents) are also increasingly seekingseek to collectively advance climate change objectives indirectly, such as by seeking to reduce the availability or increase the cost of financing and investment in the oil and gas sector. These actions include delaying or blocking needed infrastructure, utilizing shareholder governance mechanisms against companies or their shareholders or financial institutions in an effort to deter investments in oil and gas activities, and taking other actions intended to promote changes in business strategy for oil and gas companies.
Achieving societal ambitions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and ultimately achieve net-zero emissions will require new technologies and added infrastructure to reduce the cost and increase the scalability of alternativesolutions energyto sources.reduce emissions. The company is continuing research and collaboration efforts to advance the development and deployment of carbon capture and storage, hydrogen, lower-emission fuels and lithium. The company’s future results and ability to succeed through the energy transition while helping meet Canada's emission-reduction goals and meet its own emission reduction goals will depend in part on the success of these research and collaboration efforts. It will also rely on the company’s ability to adapt and apply the strengths of its current business model to providing the energy products of the future in a cost-competitive manner.
The scale of the world’s energy system means that, in addition to developments in technology discussed above, anymeeting successfulsociety’s needs for energy transitionand reducing emissions will require appropriate support from governments and private participants throughout the global economy. Ultimately, market solutions with sound business fundamentals are necessary to incentivize and sustain wide-spread solutions that drive emissions reductions. The company’s ability to develop and deploy carbon capture and storage, hydrogen, lower-emission fuels, lithium, and other new energy technologies at commercial scale will depend in part on the continued development of stable and supportive government policies and markets. Failure or delay of these policies or markets to materialize or be maintained, or the development of these policies or markets in a manner that differs from the company’s expectations, could adversely impact or delay these investments. Policy and other actions that result in restricting the availability of hydrocarbon products without a commensurate reduction in demand may have unpredictable adverse effects, including increased commodity price volatility; periods of significantly higher commodity prices and resulting inflationary pressures; and local or regional energy shortages. Such effects, in turn, may depress economic growth or lead to rapid or conflicting shifts in policy by different actors, with resulting adverse effects on the company’s business.
Reliance upon third-party suppliers, service providers and ExxonMobil global capability centres
The company also enters into contractual relationships with suppliers, partners and other counterparties to procure and sell goods and services, including with counterparties located outside of Canada. Furthermore, the company has agreements with affiliates of ExxonMobil to provide services to the company and to share common business and operational support services to allow the companies to consolidate duplicate work and systems and benefit from global best practices and expertise, and in 2025 the company announced restructuring plans to centralize additional corporate and technical activities in ExxonMobil global business and technology centres, leveraging its relationship with ExxonMobil to realize substantial efficiency and effectiveness benefits from scale, integration and technology. The company’s operations, market position and financial condition may be adversely impacted if these counterparties fail to fulfil their obligations. For counterparties located outside of Canada, the risk of such failure may be enhanced and the company’s ability to mitigate against such failure may be reduced as a result of a lack of physical proximity, foreign government actions or other geopolitical factors.
Litigation
The company may also be adversely affected by the outcome of litigationlitigation, including class actions or arbitrationarbitrations, resultingand fromby itsgovernment operations,investigations includingor but not limited to proceedingsenforcement, in respect of greenhouse gas emissions andemissions, the promotion of the company’s products, or by government enforcement proceedings allegingalleged non-compliance with applicable laws or regulations. Such proceedings are subject to uncertainty and success is not guaranteed, and the company may incur significant expenses and devote significant resources in defending such proceedings.
Operating costs and inflation
Current and future increases in operating costs such as energy, transportation and materials, including through shipping, supply chain disruptions and inflationary cost pressures, could adversely affect the company’s financial results if it is unable to control or offset these costs. In addition to direct potential impacts on the company's costs and revenues, market factors such as rates of inflation may indirectly impact results to the extent such factors reduce general rates of economic growth and therefore energy demand, as discussed under "Supply and demand". Further, althoughAs inflationary pressures declinedgenerally stabilized in Canada and other countries during 2024,2025, moderate inflation levels have persisted andmany governments generallywere maintainedable elevatedto lower interest rates which may further impactover the companyperiod. through the availability of financing, cost of debt, and exchange rate fluctuations. In addition, potentialPotential tariffs and retaliatory actions discussed above in this Item 1A under “Other"Economic supply-related factors”conditions" could have furtherreintroduce inflationary impacts.effects and may adversely impact the company through availability of financing, cost of debt, and exchange rate fluctuations. Additional information regarding the potential future impact of market factors on the company's businesses is included or incorporated by reference under "Item 7A Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk" in this report.
The nature of the company’s Upstream, Downstream and Chemical businesses depend on complex, long-term, and capital intensive projects that require a high degree of project management expertise to maximize efficiency. This includes development, engineering, construction, commissioning and ongoing operational activities and expertise. The company’s results are affected by its ability to develop and operate projects and facilities as planned, and by events or conditions that affect the advancement, operation, cost or results of such projects or facilities. These risks include the company’s ability to obtain the necessary environmental and other regulatory approvals; changes in regulations; the ability to negotiate successfully with joint venturers, partners, governments, suppliers, customers and others; the ability to protect and enforce the company’s contractual and legal rights (including with joint venture partners); the ability to model and optimize reservoir performance and production reliability; changes in resources and operating costs including the availability and cost of materials, equipment and qualified personnel; the ability to qualify for certain incentives available under supportive government policies for emerging markets and technologies; the impact of general economic, business and market conditions; and the company’s ability to prevent, to the extent possible, and respond effectively to unforeseen technical difficulties that could delay project start-up or cause unscheduled downtime.
The company’s research and development organizations must be able to adapt to a changing market, regulatory and policy environment, including developing or deploying technologies to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions intensity. To remain competitive, the company must also continuously adapt and capture the benefits of new technologiesand emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence, including growing the company’s capabilities to utilize digital data technologies (including but not limited to artificial intelligence technologies) to gain new business insights and support business decisions and operations.
In 2023, theThe company’s Kearl site completedhas converted all of its multiyear program to convert its 81 haul trucks to autonomous operation. The autonomous system is composed of perception systems, sensors and mechanical components on each truck, which feed information to a number of onboard computer systems. These onboard computer systems send real time information over a wireless network to a central server and database that displays real time information to central control room operators who manage the overall fleet’s operation. Computer automation systems are used to both maneuver the individual trucks and in an overarching truck assignment application which manages truck routing patterns. The use of the autonomous system helps the company to capture productivity improvements while also reducing costs and further enhancing operational safety. Failure of the autonomous system to operate as intended could result in material adverse impacts to production at the Kearl site and the company’s financial results, physical harm to people or the environment, damage or destruction of company assets, and negative reputational consequences. The company applies risk management, internal controls and controls management systems in respect of these risks relating to autonomous haul trucks, as described in “Safety, business controls and environmental risk management” in this Item 1A below. See also “Cybersecurity” and “Reputation” in this Item 1A below.
Safety, business controls and environmental risk management
The scope and nature of the company’s operations present a variety of significant hazards and risks, including operational hazards and risks such as explosions, fires, pipeline ruptures and crude oiloil, chemical or produced water spills. Imperial’s operations are also subject to the additional hazards of pollution, releases of toxic gas and environmental hazards and risks, including severe weather (such as extreme cold or wet weather events that have previously impacted the company's oil sands operations in early 2022), drought, forest fires and geological events. The company’s results depend on management’sand ability to minimizeachieve its business objectives depend on effectively identifying, assessing, and mitigating these inherent risks, tomaintaining effectivelyrobust controloperational business activitiesintegrity, and to minimizereducing the potential for human error. TheTo manage these risks, the company applies rigorous management systems, including aan combined program of effectiveintegrated operations integrity management,management system framework, structured processes for equipment inspection, surveillance, maintenance and replacement, and ongoing upgrades,enhancements keyto equipmentcritical replacements, and comprehensive inspection and surveillance.safeguards. The company also maintains a disciplined framework of internal controls and applies a controls management system for monitoring compliance with this framework. The company’s upstreamUpstream and downstreamDownstream operations may experience loss of production, slowdowns or shutdowns and increased costs due to the failure of interdependent systems, and substantial liabilities and other adverse impacts could result if the company’s management systems and controls do not function as intended.
The company’s operations have been and in the future may be disrupted by severe weather events, natural disasters, human error, cyberattacks, and similar events. The company's facilities are designed, engineered, constructed, and operated to withstand a variety of extreme climatic and other conditions, with safety factors built in to cover a number of uncertainties, including those associated with permafrost stability, temperature extremes, extreme rainfall events, earthquakes and other events. The company's consideration of changing weather conditions and inclusion of safety factors in design coverscover the engineering uncertainties that climate change and other events may potentially introduce. Imperial’s ability to mitigate the adverse impacts of these events depends in part upon the effectiveness of its robust facility engineering, rigorous disasteremergency preparedness and response, and business continuity planning.
The company has limited ability to influence third parties, including the company's partners, suppliers, service providers (including providers of cloud-based services for the company's data or applications) and customers, to implement strong cybersecurity controls, and the company is exposed to potential harm from cybersecurity events that may affect their operations. During 2024, the company responded to several cyber-attacks on suppliers and joint venture partners, none of which caused a material impact to Imperial. The company’s response included giving technical assistance, loaning equipment, and taking additional defensive measures.
Imperial’s reputation is an important corporate asset. Factors that could have an impact on the company’s reputation include an operating incident or significant cybersecurity disruption; changes in consumer views concerning the company’s products; changes in consumer media preferences from traditional mainstream media to decentralized and personalized media; a perception by the public that the company is not being fully transparent in the sharing of information regarding its operations that is or may be relevant to community decision-making; actions taken by the company's business partners; a perception by investors or others that insufficient progress is being made with respect to the company’s ambition in the energy transition, or that pursuit of this ambition may result in allocation of capital to investments with reduced returns; divergent and evolving policy, legal and regulatory developments, societal views and investor pressures regarding the energy transition; and other adverse events such as those described in this Item 1A. Negative impacts on Imperial’s reputation could, in turn, make it more difficult for the company to compete successfully for new opportunities, obtain necessary regulatory approvals, obtain financing, and attract talent, or they could reduce customer or consumer demand for the company’s branded products. Imperial’s reputation may also be harmed by events which negatively affect the image of the industry as a whole, including public and investor perception of Alberta oil sands in relation to greenhouse gas emissions, Indigenous rights and environmental impact.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “2025 Net income (loss) factor analysis”
New heading “2025 Net income (loss) factor analysis”
New heading “2025 Net income (loss) factor analysis”
Removed heading “2023 Net income (loss) factor analysis”
Removed heading “2023 Net income (loss) factor analysis”
Removed heading “2023 Net income (loss) factor analysis”
Largest changes
“Net income in 2025 was $3,268 million, or $6.48 per share on a diluted basis, compared to $4,790 million, or $9.03 per share in 2024. …”see in full comparison
“The general rate of inflation in Canada and across many other major countries peaked in 2022, rising from already elevated levels in 2021, due to additional impacts on energy and other commodities from the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Inflation has trended down since 2023 as a result of aggressive monetary tightening by major central banks and slowing global economic growth. In Canada, inflation has declined towards the Bank of Canada's target. The company closely monitors market trends and works to mitigate both operating and capital cost impacts in all price environments.”see in full comparison
“Current year results include identified items1 of a $306 million after-tax ($406 million before-tax) non-cash impairment charge of the Calgary Imperial Campus and a $249 million after-tax ($330 million before-tax) restructuring charge; results also reflect higher incentive compensation as a result of the higher share price.”see in full comparison
“During 2025, the price of crude oil decreased relative to 2024, as increased OPEC+ output, record U.S. production, and global economic growth deceleration created a significant supply‑demand imbalance, while brief geopolitical price spikes faded quickly and failed to counter the broader downward pressure. In addition, the Canadian WTI/WCS spread narrowed as expanded TMX export capacity improved market access, while steady U.S. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (72)
The Outlook uses projections and scenarios from reputable third parties such as the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Included in the range of these scenarios are: the IPCC likelyLikely belowBelow 2°C scenarios and three scenarios from the IEA; IEA Stated Policies Scenario (STEPS; 2025 World Energy Outlook (WEO)), which reflects a sector-by-sector assessment of current policy in place orand those announced by governments; IEA Announced Pledges Scenario (APS; 2024 WEO), which reflects aspirational government targets met on time and in full; and IEA Net Zero Emissions by 2050 Scenario (NZE; 2025 WEO), which the IEA describes as extremelyhighly ambitious and challenging, acknowledging that society is not currently on the IEA NZE pathway. No single transition pathway can be reasonably predicted, given the wide range of uncertainties. Key unknowns include yet-to-be-developed or changes in developed government policies, market conditions, and advances in technology that may influence the cost, pace, and potential availability of certain pathways. Scenarios that employ a full complement of technology options are likely to provide the most economically efficient pathways.
By 2050, the world’s population is projected to be around 9.7 billion people, or nearly 2 billion more than in 2023.2024. Coincident with this population increase, the Outlook projects worldwide economic growth to average approximately 2.5 percent per year, with economic output nearly doubling by 2050 compared to 2023.2024. As economies and populations grow, and as living standards improve for billions of people, the need for energy is expected to continue to rise. Even with significant efficiency gains, global energy demand is projected to rise by almostover 1510 percent from 20232024 to 2050. This increase in energy demand is expected to be driven by developing countries (i.e., those that are not member nations of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)). By contrast, energy use in developed nations is expected to decline by more than 10 percent as efficiency improves.
Under the Outlook, global electricity demand is expected to increase more than 7570 percent from 20232024 to 2050, with developing countries likely to account for approximately 80 percent of the increase. Consistent with this projection, power generation is expected to remain the largest and fastest growing major segment of global primary energy demand, supported by a wide variety of energy sources. The share of coal-fired generation is expected to decline substantially to approximately 15 percent of the world’s electricity in 2050, versus approximately 35 percent in 2023,2024, in part due to policies to improve air quality as well as reduce greenhouse gas emissions to address risks related to climate change. From 20232024 to 2050, the amount of electricity supplied using natural gas, nuclear power, and renewables is expected to more than double, accounting for the entire growth in electricity supplies and offsetting the reduction of coal. Electricity from wind and solar is expected to increase morenearly than 450400 percent, helping total renewables (including other sources, e.g., hydropower) to account for approximately 90 percent of the increase in electricity supplies through 2050. Total renewables are expected to reach over 50 percent of global electricity supplies by 2050. Natural gas and nuclear are expected to be about 20 percent and 10 percent, respectively, of global electricity supplies by 2050. Supplies of electricity by energy type will reflect significant differences across regions reflecting a wide range of factors, including the cost and availability of various energy supplies and policy developments.
Energy for transportation - including cars, trucks, ships, trains, and airplanes - is expected to increase by aboutnearly 25 percent from 20232024 to 2050. Transportation energy demand is expected to account for aboutover 6050 percent of the growth in liquid fuels demand worldwide over this period. Light-duty vehicle demand for liquid fuels is projected to peakhave bypeaked aroundthis 2025,decade, and then decline to levels seen in the early-2000searly-2010s by 2050, as the impact of better fuel economy and significant growth in electric cars, led by China, Europe, and the United States, work to offset growth in the worldwide car fleet of approximately 6560 percent. By 2050, light-duty vehicles are expected to account for around 20 percent of global liquid fuels demand. During the same time period, nearly all the world’s commercial transportation fleets are expected to continue to run on liquid fuels, including biofuels, which are expected to be widely available and offer practical advantages in providing a large quantity of energy in small volumes.
Liquid fuels provide the largest share of global energy supplies today reflecting broad-based availability, affordability, ease of transportation, and fitness as a practical solution to meet a wide variety of needs. By 2050, global demand for liquid fuels is projected to grow to approximatelynearly 110115 million oil-equivalent barrels per day, an increase of about 10 percent from 2023.2024. The non-OECD share of global liquid fuels demand is expected to increase to nearlyabout 70 percent by 2050, as liquid fuels demand in the OECD is expected to decline by more than 25 percent. Much of the global liquid fuels demand today is met by crude production from conventional sources; these supplies will remain important, and significant development activity is expected to offset much of the natural declines from these fields. At the same time, a variety of supply sources - including tight oil, deepwater, oil sands, natural gas liquids, and biofuels - are expected to grow to help meet rising demand. Timely investments will remain critical to meeting global needs with reliable and affordable supplies.
Natural gas is a lower-emission, versatile and practical fuel for a wide variety of applications. Global natural gas demand is expected to rise more thannearly 20 percent from 20232024 to 2050, with approximately 7570 percent of that increase coming from the Asia Pacific region. Significant growth in supplies of unconventional gas - the natural gas found in shale and other tight rock formations - will help meet these needs. In total, aboutover 3540 percent of the growth in natural gas supplies is expected to come from unconventional sources. At the same time, conventionally-produced natural gas is likely to remain the cornerstone of global supply, meeting around two-thirds of worldwide demand in 2050. Liquefied natural gas (LNG) trade will expand significantly, meeting about 7075 percent of the increase in global demand growth, with much of this supply expected to help meet rising demand in the Asia Pacific.Pacific region.
The world’s energy mix is highly diverse and will remain so through 2050. Oil is expected to continue as the largest source of energy with its share remaining close to 30 percent in 2050. Coal and natural gas are the next largest sources of energy today, with the share of natural gas growing to more than 25 percent by 2050, while the share of coal falls to about half that of natural gas. Nuclear power is projected to grow, as many nations are likely to expand nuclear capacity to address rising electricity needs as well as energy security and environmental issues. Total renewable energy is expected to exceed 20 percent of global energy by 2050, with other renewables (e.g., biomass, hydropower, geothermal) contributing a combined share of more than 10 percent. Total energy supplied from wind and solar is expected to increase rapidly, growing overnearly 400350 percent from 20232024 to 2050, when they are projected to be nearlygreater 12than 10 percent of the world energy mix.
Decarbonization of industrial activities will require a suite of nascent or future lower-carbon technologies andsupported by stable supporting policies. Lower-emission fuels, hydrogen-based fuels, and carbon capture and storage are three key lower-carbon solutions needed to support a lower-emission future, in addition to wind and solar. Along with electrification, lower-emission fuels are expected to play an important role in decarbonization of the transportation sector, particularly in hard-to-decarbonize areas, such as aviation. Low-carbon hydrogen will be a key enabler replacing traditional furnace fuel to decarbonize the industrial sector. Hydrogen and hydrogen-based fuels like ammonia are also expected to make inroads into commercial transportation as technology improves to lower its cost and policy develops to support the needed infrastructure development. Carbon capture and storage on its own, or in combination with hydrogen production, is among the few proven technologies that could enable CO2 emission reductions from high-emitting and hard-to-decarbonize sectors such as power generation and heavy industries, including manufacturing, refining, and petrochemicals.
The Outlook shows oil production declines at a rate of about 15 percent per year. At that rate, in the absence of continued investment, by 2030 oil supplies would fall from 100 million barrels per day to less than 30 million barrels, more than 70 million barrels per day short of what is needed to meet demand. Limiting investment to only existing fields would slow the decline to about 4 percent, however, this would still be well below the oil demand in the IEA APS and average of IPCC Likely Below 2°C scenarios.
During 2025, the price of crude oil decreased relative to 2024, as increased OPEC+ output, record U.S. production, and global economic growth deceleration created a significant supply‑demand imbalance, while brief geopolitical price spikes faded quickly and failed to counter the broader downward pressure. In addition, the Canadian WTI/WCS spread narrowed as expanded TMX export capacity improved market access, while steady U.S. refinery demand and reduced western Canadian inventories in the second quarter, driven by turnarounds and wildfire‑related supply impacts, further tightened the differential. Industry refining margins improved in 2025, influenced by geopolitical factors and supply disruptions. The company closely monitors market trends and works to mitigate both operating and capital cost impacts in all price environments.
During 2025, the United States announced a variety of trade-related actions, including the imposition of tariffs on imports from Canada and several other countries. In response, Canada announced its own retaliatory tariffs. Despite the current uncertainty as to what effects these actions will ultimately have on Imperial, its suppliers and its customers, the company does not anticipate any material near-term financial impacts.
During 2024, the price of crude oil remained relatively consistent with the 2023 full-year average, as markets remained balanced. In addition, the Canadian WTI/WCS spread narrowed versus the 2023 full-year average. Refining margins declined in 2024 from 2023 levels as increased supply from industry capacity additions outpaced global demand.
The general rate of inflation in Canada and across many other major countries peaked in 2022, rising from already elevated levels in 2021, due to additional impacts on energy and other commodities from the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Inflation has trended down since 2023 as a result of aggressive monetary tightening by major central banks and slowing global economic growth. In Canada, inflation has declined towards the Bank of Canada's target. The company closely monitors market trends and works to mitigate both operating and capital cost impacts in all price environments.
(a) Contractual obligations associated with the Norman Wells end of field life acceleration.
Net income in 2025 was $3,268 million, or $6.48 per share on a diluted basis, compared to $4,790 million, or $9.03 per share in 2024. Current year results include identified items1 of: $320 million after-tax ($421 million before-tax) related to the Norman Wells end of field life acceleration; a $306 million after-tax ($406 million before-tax) non-cash impairment charge of the Calgary Imperial Campus; a $249 million after-tax ($330 million before-tax) restructuring charge; and a one-time $156 million after-tax ($206 million before-tax) charge associated with the optimization of materials and supplies inventory.
Net income in 2023 was $4,889 million, or $8.49 per share on a diluted basis, compared to $7,340 million, or$11.44 per share in 2022.
Upstream
The company has a significant oil and gas resource base and a large inventory of potential projects. The company’s current investment strategy is to invest for value and select volume growth, with focus on optimization within existing assets, cost reduction opportunities and productivity enhancements that aim to deliver robust returns at a wide range of prices. The company also continues to evaluate opportunities to support long-term growth. Although actual volumes willtypically vary from year to year, the focus is on value-add, long-term growth opportunities within the context of the factors described in "Item 1A. Risk factors". The company continually evaluates opportunities, including the pace of development for the Aspen project.
At Kearl, gross production was about 281,000280,000 barrels per day (200,000199,000 barrels Imperial’s share), which is ana increasedecrease of about 11,0001,000 barrels per day (9,0001,000 barrels Imperial's share) compared to 2023, as a result of improved mine fleet productivity and optimized turnaround.2024.
At Cold Lake, annual production averaged 148,000 barrels per day, which is an increase of about 13,000 barrels per day compared to 2023, primarily driven by Grand Rapids.
At Syncrude,Cold Lake, annual production averaged 75,000151,000 barrels per day, which is aan decreaseincrease of about 1,0003,000 barrels per day compared to 2023.2024.
At Syncrude, annual production averaged 79,000 barrels per day, which is an increase of about 4,000 barrels per day compared to 2024.
2025 Net income (loss) factor analysis
Price – Average bitumen realizations decreased by $7.52 per barrel, primarily driven by lower marker prices partially offset by narrowing WTI/WCS spread and favourable diluent. Synthetic crude oil realizations decreased by $12.92 per barrel, primarily driven by lower WTI.
Volume – Inventory impacts partially offset by higher production.
Royalty – Lower royalties were primarily driven by lower commodity prices.
Other – Primarily due to favourable foreign exchange impacts of about $190 million.
Identified items1 – $320 million after-tax ($421 million before-tax) related to the Norman Wells end of field life acceleration and a separate one-time $100 million after-tax ($131 million before-tax) charge associated with the Upstream portion of the optimization of materials and supplies inventory.
2023 Net income (loss) factor analysis
Price – Lower bitumen realizations were primarily driven by lower marker prices. Average bitumen realizations decreased by $17.25 per barrel, generally in line with WCS, and synthetic crude oil realizations decreased by $19.89 per barrel, generally in line with WTI.
Volume – Lower volumes were primarily driven by steam cycle timing at Cold Lake, and the absence of XTO Energy Canada production, partially offset by improved reliability, plant capacity utilization, and mine equipment productivity at Kearl.
Royalty – Lower royalties were primarily driven by weakened commodity prices.
Identified Items1 – Prior year results included favourable identified items1 related to the company's gain on the sale of interests in XTO Energy Canada.
Other – Includes favourable foreign exchange impacts of about $380 million, and lower operating expenses of about $380 million, primarily due to lower energy prices.
Crude oil and natural gas liquids (NGL) - production and sales (a)
Higher bitumen production was mainly attributable to Kearl, and primarily driven by improved reliability, plant capacity utilization, and mine equipment productivity.
The company owns and operates three refineries in Canada with aggregate distillation capacity of 434,000 barrels per day. Refining margins are largely driven by differences in commodity prices and are a function of the difference between what a refinery pays for its raw materials (primarily crude oil) and the market prices for the range of products produced (primarily gasoline, heating oil, diesel oil, jet fuel, fuel oil and asphalt). Crude oil and many products are widely traded with published prices, including those quoted on the New York Mercantile Exchange. Prices for these commodities are determined by the global and regional marketplaces and are influenced by many factors, including global and regional supply/demand balances, inventory levels, industry refinery operations, import/export balances, currency fluctuations, seasonal demand, weather and politicalgeopolitical considerations. While industry refining margins significantly impact earnings, strong operational performance, product mix optimization, and disciplined cost control are also critical to the company's strong financial performance. The company's integration across the value chain, from refining to marketing, enhances overall value across the fuels business.
Refining margins declinedstrengthened in 20242025 fromdriven 2023by strong distillate demand and relatively low inventory levels asdue to global supply from industry capacity additions outpaced global demand growth.disruptions. The company continues to closely monitor industry and global economic conditions.
In January 2023, the company fully funded the Strathcona renewable diesel project, the largest such facility in Canada, located at Strathcona refinery. The facility will useuses hydrogen, locally sourced and grown feedstocks and the company's proprietary catalyst to produce renewable diesel. Facility construction commenced in 2023 and thewas projectcompleted isand expectedcommissioned with first on-spec renewable diesel produced in July 2025 bringing lower-emission fuels to start up in the middle of 2025.market.
2025 Net income (loss) factor analysis
Margins – Higher margins primarily reflect improved market conditions.
Other – Primarily due to higher operating expenses of about $140 million driven by higher energy costs, additional maintenance in the company's eastern manufacturing hub of about $70 million, and unfavourable wholesale volume impacts of about $60 million, partially offset by lower turnaround impacts of about $100 million.
2023 Net income (loss) factor analysis
Margins – Lower margins primarily reflect weaker market conditions.
Other – Higher turnaround impacts of about $340 million, associated with the planned turnaround activities at the Strathcona and Sarnia refineries, partially offset by favourable foreign exchange impacts of about $210 million, improved volumes of about $50 million, and lower operating expenses of about $50 million, primarily due to lower energy prices.
Lower refinery throughput in 2023 reflected the impact of planned turnaround activities at Strathcona and Sarnia refineries.
In 2024,2025, the Chemicals business had strong operating performanceperformance, building on the improvements achieved following 2023the plannedcompletion of maintenance activities.activities in prior years.
2025 Net income (loss) factor analysis
Margins – Lower margins primarily reflect weaker industry polyethylene margins.
2023 Net income (loss) factor analysis
Current year results include identified items1 of a $306 million after-tax ($406 million before-tax) non-cash impairment charge of the Calgary Imperial Campus and a $249 million after-tax ($330 million before-tax) restructuring charge; results also reflect higher incentive compensation as a result of the higher share price.
Funding of registered retirement plans complies with federal and provincial pension regulations, and the company makes contributions to the plans based on an independent actuarial valuation completed at least once every three years depending on funding status. The most recent valuation of the company’s registered retirement plans was completed as at December 31, 2022. A valuation of the company's registered retirement plans as at December 31, 2025 is expected to be completed in 2026. The company contributed $150$148 million to the registered retirement plans in 2024.2025. Future funding requirements are not expected to affect the company’s existing capital investment plans or its ability to pursue new investment opportunities.
Cash flows from operating activities primarily reflect favourable working capital impacts.
Cash flows from operating activities primarily reflect unfavourable working capital impacts, including an income tax catch-up payment of $2.1 billion, as well as lower Upstream realizations and Downstream margins.
Cash flows used in investing activities primarily reflect the absence of proceeds from the sale of interests in XTO Energy Canada, and higher additions to property, plant and equipment.
At the end of 2025, total debt outstanding was $3,997 million, compared with $4,011 million at the end of 2024.
During the fourth quarter of 2025, the company extended the maturity dates of its two existing $250 million committed lines of credit to November 2026 and November 2027, respectively.
At the end of 2023, total debt outstanding was $4,132 million, compared with $4,155 million at the end of 2022.
During the fourth quarter of 2023, the company extended the maturity dates of its two existing $250 million committed lines of credit to November 2024 and November 2025, respectively.
On June 23, 2025, the company announced by news release that it had received final approval from the Toronto Stock Exchange for a new normal course issuer bid to continue its then-existing share purchase program. The program enabled the company to purchase up to a maximum of 25,452,248 common shares during the period June 29, 2025 to June 28, 2026. The program completed on December 17, 2025 as a result of the company purchasing the maximum allowable number of shares under the program.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
We could not find a separate Risk Factors item in the latest 10-Q. Some companies leave it out of quarterly reports; see the annual 10-K risk factors and the original filing. Open the filing on SEC.gov.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Six months 2026 vs. six months 2025”
New heading “Marker prices and average realizations”
New heading “Refinery utilization and petroleum product sales”
New heading “Liquidity and capital resources”
Removed heading “Net income (loss) factor analysis”
Removed heading “Net income (loss) factor analysis”
Removed heading “Net income (loss) factor analysis”
Removed heading “Corporate and other”
Largest changes
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (52)
During the firstsecond quarter of 2026, the price of crude oil increased relative to the fourthfirst quarter of 2025,2026, while the Canadian WTI/WCS spread widened.widened slightly. Geopolitical events in the Middle East and increasing supply uncertainty continued to drive volatility in crude oil prices and heavy crude differentials. Industry refining margins improved in the firstsecond quarter of 2026, impacted by industryglobal product supply outages.disruptions.
DuringStarting in 2025, the United States implemented and adjusted a variety of trade-related measures, including tariffs on certain imports from Canada and several other countries. In response, Canada announced its own retaliatory tariffs. Based on Imperial's assessment of these actions and their effects to date, the company does not expect them to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
FirstSecond quarter 2026 vs. firstsecond quarter 2025
Upstream
Net income (loss) factor analysis
Price – Average bitumen realizations decreasedincreased by $7.10$29.97 per barrel, primarily driven by higher marker prices, partially offset by a weaker WTI/WCS spread.spread and higher diluent costs. Synthetic crude oil realizations decreasedincreased by $2.66$53.25 per barrel, primarily driven by ahigher weakermarker prices and an improved Synthetic/WTI spread.
Volume – Lower volumes were primarily driven by lower production at Kearl and Syncrude.
Royalty – Higher royalties were primarily driven by higher commodity prices.
Volume – Inventory impacts partially offset by higher production.
Other – Primarily due to unfavourable foreign exchange impacts of about $100 million.
(a)In the firstsecond quarter of 2026, Syncrude gross production included about 80 thousand barrels per day of bitumen and other products (2025 - 24 thousand barrels per day) that were exported to the operator's facilities using an existing interconnect pipeline.
Lower production at Kearl was driven by the absence of exceptional high-quality ore grade versus the second quarter of 2025.
Lower production at Syncrude was driven by unplannedextreme coker downtime,rainfall, partially offset by improvedlower mineunplanned reliability.downtime.
Margins – Higher margins primarily reflect improved market conditions.
Other – Primarily due to turnaround impacts of about $190 million partially offset by favourable product mix effects of about $140 million.
Downstream
Net income (loss) factor analysis
Other – Primarily due to product mix effects.
Lower refinery throughput and capacity utilization were primarily due to unplannedplanned downtimeturnaround and a disruption of synthetic crude feedstock caused by Syncrude's coker outage.impacts.
Lower petroleum product sales were primarilyaligned duewith lower throughput related to lowerplanned volumesturnaround inwork at the supplyStrathcona channel.refinery.
Imperial has updated its refinery throughput and refinery utilization guidance ranges for 2026 from 395,000 - 405,000 barrels per day and 91% - 93% utilization to 370,000 - 380,000 barrels per day and 85% - 88% utilization, to reflect unplanned downtime, and a short-term rail logistic challenge at Strathcona which is targeted to be resolved by year end.
Margins – Higher margins primarily reflect improved industry polyethylene margins.
Net income (loss) factor analysis
Corporate and other
Current yearquarter results reflect higherlower incentive compensation as a result of the higher share price.compensation.
Cash flows from operating activities primarily reflect lowerhigher earnings and unfavourable working capital impacts.earnings.
Cash flows used in investing activities primarily reflect higher additions to property, plantplant, and equipment.equipment offset by proceeds from the sale of surplus property in Montreal.
(a)The company did not purchase any shares in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 and 2025.
On June 23, 2026, the company announced by news release that it had received final approval from the Toronto Stock Exchange for a new normal course issuer bid and will continue its existing share purchase program. Shareholders may obtain a copy of the Notice of Intention to Make a Normal Course Issuer Bid approved by the TSX without charge by contacting the company. The program enables the company to purchase up to a maximum of 24,179,635 common shares during the period June 29, 2026 to June 28, 2027. This maximum includes shares purchased under the normal course issuer bid from ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation. As in the past, ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation has advised the company that it intends to participate to maintain its ownership percentage at approximately 69.6 percent. The program will end should the company purchase the maximum allowable number of shares or otherwise on June 28, 2027. Imperial plans to accelerate its share purchases under the normal course issuer bid program, and anticipates repurchasing all remaining allowable shares prior to year end. Purchase plans may be modified at any time without prior notice.
Six months 2026 vs. six months 2025
Price – Average bitumen realizations increased by $11.41 per barrel, primarily driven by higher marker prices, partially offset by a weaker WTI/WCS spread and higher diluent costs. Synthetic crude oil realizations increased by $25.72 per barrel, primarily driven by higher marker prices and an improved Synthetic/WTI spread.
Volume – Lower volumes were primarily driven by lower production at Kearl and Syncrude.
Royalty – Higher royalties were primarily driven by higher commodity prices.
Other – Primarily due to unfavourable foreign exchange impacts of about $100 million and higher operating costs of about $100 million, primarily related to Syncrude.
Marker prices and average realizations
Production
(a)In 2026, Syncrude gross production included about 4 thousand barrels per day of bitumen and other products (2025 - 3 thousand barrels per day) that were exported to the operator's facilities using an existing interconnect pipeline.
Margins – Higher margins primarily reflect improved market conditions.
Other – Primarily due to favourable product mix effects of about $230 million partially offset by turnaround impacts of about $190 million.
Refinery utilization and petroleum product sales
Lower refinery throughput and capacity utilization were primarily due to planned turnaround impacts.
Lower petroleum product sales were aligned with lower throughput related to planned turnaround work at the Strathcona refinery.
Imperial has updated its refinery throughput and refinery utilization guidance ranges for 2026 from 395,000 - 405,000 barrels per day and 91% - 93% utilization to 370,000 - 380,000 barrels per day and 85% - 88% utilization, to reflect unplanned downtime, and a short-term rail logistic challenge at Strathcona which is targeted to be resolved by year end.
Chemicals
Margins – Higher margins primarily reflect improved industry polyethylene margins.
Liquidity and capital resources
Cash flows from operating activities primarily reflect higher earnings partially offset by unfavourable working capital impacts.
Cash flows used in investing activities primarily reflect additions to property, plant, and equipment partially offset by proceeds from the sale of surplus property in Montreal.
Cash flows used in financing activities primarily reflect:
Statements of future events or conditions in this report, including projections, targets, expectations, estimates, and business plans are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as believe, anticipate, intend, propose, plan, goal, seek, project, predict, target, estimate, expect, strategy, outlook, schedule, future, continue, likely, may, should, will and similar references to future periods. Forward-looking statements in this release include, but are not limited to, references to the renewalcompany’s ofpurchases under the company’s normal course issuer bid and plans to accelerate completion prior to year end; the continued evaluation of the company’s share purchase program in the context of overall capital activities; the company’s updated Downstream refinery throughput and capacity utilization guidance for 2026; company performance in the second half of the year; the target date to resolve short-term rail logistic challenges at Strathcona by year end; the use of derivative instruments and effectiveness of risk mitigation; the company’s workforce transformation and restructuring plans to centralize activities in global business and technology centres, including timing and impacts; and the impact on the company of trade-related actions.
Forward-looking statements are based on the company's current expectations, estimates, projections and assumptions at the time the statements are made. Actual future financial and operating results, including expectations and assumptions concerning for the renewal of the company’s normal course issuer bid, approval of the Toronto Stock Exchange and participation of the company’s majority shareholder; future energy demand, supply and mix; production rates, growth and mix across various assets; for shareholder returns, assumptions such as cash flow forecasts, financing sources and capital structure, participation of the company’s majority shareholder in the normal course issuer bid, and the results of periodic and ongoing evaluation of alternate uses of capital; project plans, timing, costs, technical evaluations and capacities and the company’s ability to effectively execute on these plans and operate its assets; availability and performance of third-party service providers, including ExxonMobil global capability centres and other service providers located outside of Canada; Strathcona rail logistics challenges; maintenance and turnaround activity and cost; capital and environmental expenditures; the ability to offset any ongoing or renewed inflationary pressures; applicable laws and government policies, including with respect to climate change, greenhouse gas emissions reductions and low carbon fuels; cash generation, financing sources and capital structure, such as dividends and shareholder returns, including the timing and amounts of share repurchases; and commodity prices, foreign exchange rates and general market conditions, could differ materially depending on a number of factors.
These factors include global, regional or local changes in supply and demand for oil, natural gas, petroleum and petrochemical products, feedstocks and other market factors, economic conditions and seasonal fluctuations and resulting demand, price, differential and margin impacts, including Canadian and foreign government action with respect to supply levels, prices, trade tariffs, trade sanctions or trade controls, disruptions, realignment or breaking of trade alliances or agreements or a broader breakdown in global trade, and disruptions in military alliances or wars; political or regulatory events, including changes in law or government policy, applicable royalty rates, and tax laws; third-party opposition to company and service provider operations, projects and infrastructure; failure, delay, reduction, revocation or uncertainty regarding supportive policy and market development for the adoption of emerging lower emission energy technologies and other technologies that support emissions reductions; the receipt, in a timely manner, of regulatory and third-party approvals, including for new technologies relating to the company’s lower emissions business activities; competition from alternative energy sources, other emission reduction technologies, and established competitors in such markets; availability and allocation of capital; project management and schedules and timely completion of projects; unanticipated technical or operational disruptions or difficulties; availability and performance of third-party service providers, including ExxonMobil global capability centres and other servicesservice providers located outside of Canada; environmental risks inherent in oil and gas exploration and production activities; environmental regulation, including climate change and greenhouse gas regulation and changes to such regulation; effectiveness of company risk management programs and emergency response preparedness; operational hazards and risks; cybersecurity incidents including incidents caused by actors employing emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence; currency exchange rates; general economic conditions, including continued or renewed inflation and the occurrence and duration of economic recessions or downturns; and other factors discussed in "Item 1A risk factors" and "Item 7 management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations" of Imperial’s most recent annual report on Form 10-K.
IMO insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
No Form 4 stock transactions in this period.
Well-known investors holding IMO (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Eagle Investment Management | 2026-06-30 | 13,590,697 | $1.5B | 2.54% | Reduced 3% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 409,538 | $45.9M | 0.03% | Added 80% |
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 283,586 | $31.8M | 0.01% | Added 6% |
| D. E. Shaw & Co. | 2026-06-30 | 205,498 | $23.1M | 0.01% | Added 31% |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 133,200 | $17.4M | — | Sold out |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 144,259 | $16.2M | 0.01% | Added 441% |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 69,595 | $7.8M | 0.01% | Added 3766% |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 55,800 | $6.3M | 0.0% | Added 40% |