KELYA 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Kelly Services Inc. (also KELYB) · Nasdaq · Services-Help Supply Services · CIK 55135 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “The proliferation of artificial intelligence-enhanced application materials and fraudulent candidates, including those potentially sponsored by hostile actors, creates operational challenges and exposes us to legal, reputational, and security risks.”
Largest changes
“If we inadvertently place individuals engaged in such schemes, or such individuals are placed by suppliers in our MSPs, we could face severe consequences including violations of international sanctions laws and export control regulations, criminal and civil liability, customer loss, government investigations, substantial fines and penalties, reputational damage, and difficulty obtaining or maintaining government contracts.”see in full comparison
“We face exposure to other significant expenses that could materially impact our financial performance, including cybersecurity incident response and remediation costs, regulatory compliance expenses, litigation and settlement costs, costs associated with employee or candidate misconduct, technology infrastructure investments required to maintain competitive service delivery, and expenses related to bad debt or client payment defaults. …”see in full comparison
“In addition to our ERP initiative, we are pursuing opportunities to integrate artificial intelligence into our business operations, including in the recruiting, applicant tracking, screening, assessment, workforce analytics, and talent management domains. While these AI tools are intended to improve efficiency and services quality, they depend on data quality, algorithmic accuracy, and ongoing maintenance and refinement. …”see in full comparison
“The proliferation of artificial intelligence-enhanced application materials and fraudulent candidates, including those potentially sponsored by hostile actors, creates operational challenges and exposes us to legal, reputational, and security risks.”see in full comparison
“Our success depends, in part, on the value associated with our brands. Because we assign employees to work under the direction and supervision of our customer at work locations not under Kelly’s control, we are at risk of our employees engaging in unauthorized or illegal conduct that could harm our reputation. Our Education segment is particularly susceptible to this exposure because it places employees in schools and educational institutions where they work directly with vulnerable populations, including minors. …”see in full comparison
“We also face emerging threats from individuals sponsored or directed by hostile nation-states or criminal organizations. These actors may use stolen identities, deepfake technology for video interviews, AI-generated documentation, and other advanced techniques to secure placement in customer organizations with the intent to steal intellectual property, commit fraud, conduct corporate espionage, facilitate cyberattacks, or generate revenue for sanctioned regimes or criminal enterprises. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (50)
Historically, the general level of economic activity and employment in the United States and the other countries in which we operate has significantly affected the demand for staffing services. In periods of economic growth, employers often add temporary employees before hiring full-time employees. However, when economic activity declines, many employers reduce their use of temporary employees before laying off full-time employees. Customer responses to real or perceived economic conditions, including perceptions related to market conditions, labor supplysupply, international trade policy, and inflation, could negatively impact customer behavior. Historically, significant changes in economic activity have disproportionately impacted staffing industry volumes. We may not fully benefit from times of increased economic activity should we experience shortages in the supply of workers. We may also experience more competitive pricing pressure and slower customer payments during periods of economic decline. A substantial portion of our revenues and earnings are generated by our business operations in the United States. Any significant economic downturn in the United States or certain other countries in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
•the effects of our dual-class common stock (including the concentration of voting power in our Class B shares);
In addition, the stock market in general,general and the Nasdaq Global Market in particular, often experiences significant price and volume fluctuations that frequently are unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of listed companies. These broad market and industry factors may seriously harm the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. A securities class action suit against us arising out of stock volatility or other investor claims, could result in substantial costs, potential liabilities and the diversion of our management’s attention and resources. Further, our operating results may be below the expectations of securities analysts or investors. In such event, the price of our common stock may decline.
Technological advances, including advances in automation and artificial intelligence, may significantly disrupt the labor market and weaken demand for human capital.
Our success is directly dependent on our customers’ demand for talent. As technology continues to evolve, an increasing number of tasks currently performed by people may be replaced by automation, robotics, machine learning, artificial intelligence,intelligence (“AI”), and other technology advances outside of our control. These changes could result in a decreased demand for human labor. This trend poses a risk to the staffing industry, particularly in lower-skill job categories and to creative, administrative, customer support,support and clerical roles vulnerable to advances in artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence is beginning to perform tasks previously handled by knowledge workers, including data entry, basic coding, document review, financial analysis, customer service, and administrative support. As these technologies become more sophisticated and widely adopted, demand for certain categories of professional and technical staff we provide may decline. While technology may create demand for new types of roles that increase the demand for our services, there is no guarantee that growth in emerging job categories will fully offset potential declines in overall staffing demand. If we are unsuccessful in responding to this potential shift in customer demand due to advancing technology, it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
The temporary employment industry is heavily regulated in many of the countries in which we operate. Changes in laws or government regulations may result in prohibition or restriction of certain types of services we can offer, increased delivery and operating complexity costs, or the imposition of new or additional pay, benefit, licensing or tax requirements that could reduce our revenues and earnings. In particular, we are subject to state unemployment taxes in the U.S., which typically increase during periods of increased levels of unemployment. Increased government regulation of the workplace, such as enhanced wage or labor protections, laws or regulations restricting the use of artificial intelligence in the employment lifecycle, or expansion of employee privacy rights, could adversely impact our business. Changes in the immigration policy in the United States could adversely impact our ability to recruit or retain non-citizen workers, including individuals employed by us on work visas, primarily H-1B, or eligible to work under temporary protected status, deferred enforcement decisions, or similar work authorizations. We also receive benefits, such as the work opportunity income tax credit in the U.S., that regularly expire and may not be reinstated. There can be no assurance that we will be able to increase the fees charged to our customers in a timely manner and in a sufficient amount to fully cover increased costs as a result of any changes in laws or government regulations. Any future changes in laws or government regulations, or interpretations or enforcement thereof, including additional laws and regulations enacted at a state or local level may make it more difficult or expensive for us to provide services and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, as state and local jurisdictions expand their regulation of the workplace, we may be unable to adequately monitor or timely respond to changes in state and local regulations, which could result in significant fines and penalties, criminal sanctions against us, our officers or our employees, prohibitions on the conduct of our business, damage to our reputation,reputation and other adverse consequences.
Unexpected changes in claim trends on our workers’ compensation, unemployment, disability anddisability, medical benefit plansplans, and other expenses may negatively impact our financial condition.
We self-insure, or otherwise bear financial responsibility for, a significant portion of expected losses under our workers’ compensation program, disability and medical benefits claims. Unexpected changes in claim trends, including the severity and frequency of claims, actuarial estimates and medical cost inflation, could result in costs that are significantly different than initially reported. If future claims-related liabilities increase due to unforeseen circumstances, or if we must make unfavorable adjustments to accruals for prior accident years, our costs could increase significantly. In addition, unemployment insurance costs are dependent on benefit claims experience from employees which may vary from current levels and result in increased costs. There can be no assurance that we will be able to increase the fees charged to our customers in a timely manner and in a sufficient amount to cover increased costs as a result of any changes in claims-related liabilities.
We face exposure to other significant expenses that could materially impact our financial performance, including cybersecurity incident response and remediation costs, regulatory compliance expenses, litigation and settlement costs, costs associated with employee or candidate misconduct, technology infrastructure investments required to maintain competitive service delivery, and expenses related to bad debt or client payment defaults. Additionally, we may incur unexpected costs related to regulatory changes, business integration or restructuring activities, or workforce retention initiatives in tight labor markets. Any of these expense categories could increase materially and unexpectedly.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to increase the fees charged to our customers in a timely manner and in a sufficient amount to cover increased costs as a result of any changes in claims-related liabilities or other unexpected expenses. As customers monitor their third-party relationships for financial risk, such adverse financial changes could result in current customer loss or inability to acquire new customers due to perceived negative financial performance.
We are subject to multiple federal, state, local,local and foreign taxes in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Our tax expense could be materially impacted by changes in tax laws in these jurisdictions, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities or changes in the mix of income by country. The overall size of our workforce and visibility of our industry may make it more likely we become a target of government investigations,investigations and we are regularly subject to audit by tax authorities. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of audits and any related litigation could be materially different from our historical tax provisions and accruals. The results of an audit or litigation could materially harm our business.
We serve many large corporate customers through high volume service agreements. While we intend to maintain or increase our revenues and earnings from our major corporate customers, we are exposed to risks arising from the possible loss of major customer accounts. A change in labor strategy or labor disruptions, including work stoppages or the deterioration of the financial condition or business prospects of these customers could reduce their need for our services and result in a significant decrease in the revenues and earnings we derive from these customers. Such change could occur due to economic, social, climate, or political factors outside of our customers' control. Inability to meet customer demands in response to these factors could result in the decline in use of our service or outright loss of customers. Our customers are also exposed to third-party risk through their use of vendors and suppliers which, in the event of a third-party incident at a customer, could result in a deterioration in their financial condition. Continuing merger and acquisition activity involving our large corporate customers could put existing business at risk or impose additional pricing pressures. Since receipts from customers generally lag payroll to temporary employees, the bankruptcy of a major customer could have a material adverse impact on our ability to meet our working capital requirements. The expansion of payment terms may extend our working capital requirements and reduce available capital for investment. Additionally, most of our customer contracts can be terminated by the customer on short notice without penalty. This creates uncertainty with respect to the revenues and earnings we may recognize with respect to our customer contracts.contracts and the loss of a large customer could have a material impact on revenue.
Our business with the federal government and government contractors presents additional risk considerations. We must comply with laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration and performance of federal government contracts. Failure to meet these obligations could result in civil penalties, fines, suspension of payments, reputational damage, disqualification from doing business with government agencies and other sanctions or adverse consequences. Government procurement practices may change in ways that impose additional costs or risks upon us or pose a competitive disadvantage. Our employees may be unable to obtain or retain the security clearances necessary to conduct business under certain contracts, or we could lose, or be unable to secure or retain, a necessary facility clearance. In the event of a security incident by us or our personnel, we may not be able to conduct future business for certain federal government clients. In addition, government agencies may temporarily or permanently lose funding for awarded contracts, reduce spending, or deprioritize future spending on contracts on which we participate, or there could be delays in the start-up of projects already awarded and funded. This creates uncertainty with respect to the revenues and earnings we may recognize with respect to our government contracts.
Our success depends, in part, on the value associated with our brands. Because we assign employees to work under the direction and supervision of our customer at work locations not under Kelly’s control, we are at risk of our employees engaging in unauthorized or illegal conduct that could harm our reputation. Our Education segment is particularly susceptible to this exposure because it places employees in schools and educational institutions where they work directly with vulnerable populations, including minors. These placements create heightened reputational and legal exposure related to potential misconduct involving students. Even a single incident of inappropriate contact, boundary violations, or prohibited interactions between our employees and students could result in significant harm to our brand, loss of client relationships, regulatory scrutiny, and legal liability. The nature of educational environments—where trust, safety, and duty of care are paramount—means that any allegation of misconduct, regardless of its ultimate validity, can damage our reputation within the education sector and more broadly. We implement screening, background checks, and training protocols that surpass regulatory compliance requirements, but we cannot entirely eliminate the risk that individuals we place may engage in conduct that violates professional boundaries or legal standards governing interactions with minors. The impact of such incidents could include contract terminations, difficulty securing new Education clients, litigation costs, regulatory penalties, and lasting damage to the Kelly brand.
Our success depends, in part, on the value associated with our brands. Because we assign employees to work under the direction and supervision of our customer at work locations not under Kelly’s control, we are at risk of our employees engaging in unauthorized conduct that could harm our reputation. Our Education segment is particularly susceptible to this exposure. Our brand reputation could also be damaged by the actions of unrelated third parties with diverse or unclear motives. Political activists, social media posts, or traditional news media could reference the Kelly brand as part of a broader communication unrelated to our business, which could result in backlash against our business practices. In addition, undesirable actions by our competitors could adversely impact the reputation of the staffing industry as a whole, negatively impacting our brand. As we increasingly use artificial intelligence in our services, incidents of bias, hallucination, or error by artificial intelligence we use, or ethical objections to our use of artificial intelligence, could negatively impact our brand. Any incident, act or omission that damages Kelly’s reputation could cause the loss of current and future customers, additional regulatory scrutiny and liability to third parties, which could negatively impact profitability.
As we increasingly offer services outside the realm of traditional staffing, including outcome-based services, business process outsourcing, vendor and supplier management,management and services intended to connect independent talent to independent work, we are exposed to additional risks which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our business strategy focuses on driving profitable growth in key specialty areas, including through business process outsourcing arrangements, where we provide operational management of our customers’ non-core functions or departments. We also plan to expand the outcome-based services we provide, which increases our risk associated with product delivery. For outcome-based services, customers may impose specific requirements that limit our flexibility and control over service delivery and can increase operational complexity, introduce compliance and security risks, and which could have a material adverse effect on our business. This could expose us to certain risks unique to that business, including civil liability, product liability, or product recalls. As the nature of work changes, we deliver services that connect independent talent to independent work with our customers which could expose the Company to risks of misclassifying workers, which could result in regulatory audits and penalties. Although we have internal vetting processes intended to control such risks, there is no assurance that these processes will be effective or that we will be able to identify these potential risks in a timely manner. Our specialties also include professional services where errors or omissions by employees or independent contractors can result in substantial injury or damages. We attempt to mitigate and transfer such risks through contractual arrangements with our customers and suppliers; however, these services may give rise to liability claims and litigation. While we maintain insurance in types and amounts we believe are appropriate for the contemplated risks, there is no assurance that such insurance coverage will remain available on reasonable terms or be sufficient in amount or scope.
We rely on third parties to support critical functions within our operations, including portions of our technology infrastructure, vendor management, customer relationship management, applicant tracking systems and in-country staffing services. If we are unable to contract with third parties having the specialized skills needed to support our growth strategies or integrate their products and services with our business, or if they fail to meet our performance requirements, the results of operations could be adversely impacted. We also rely on supplier partnerships to deliver certain services to customers. If our suppliers fail to meet our standards and expectations, or are unfavorably regarded by our customers, our ability to discontinue the relationship may be limited, which could result in reputational damage, customer loss,loss and adversely affect our results of operations. The failure or inability to adequately perform on the part of one or more of these critical vendors, suppliers, or partners could cause significant disruptions and increased costs. Moreover, these third parties are often subject to international laws and regulations regarding their conduct, including compliance with anti-bribery, anti-corruption, human trafficking, forced or child labor, trade sanctions, sustainability,sustainability and other compliance obligations ("“Global Compliance Obligations"”). While we maintain processes to monitor these third-parties for compliance to these standards, failure of these third-parties to adhere to Global Compliance Obligations could result in significant fines and penalties, criminal sanctions against us, our officers or our employees, prohibitions on the conduct of our business, customer loss, and damage to our reputation.
Our information technology strategy focuses on improvements to our technology stack across the company, including synergies in our applicant onboarding and tracking systems, order management system, financial processes, and enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system. While we have launched a multi-year strategic initiative to integrate all of our businesses into a single ERP system, full implementation of a unified ERP system is a complex, multi-year undertaking, and we face significant risks associated with completing the remaining phases of this initiative. The implementation of our enterprise-wide ERP system may experience delays, cost overruns, or technical challenges that prevent timely completion. We may encounter difficulties integrating our diverse business units into a single ERP. The complexity of harmonizing workflows, data migration, user adoption, and system customization could result in business disruptions, operational inefficiencies, or data integrity issues during the transition period. Even if successfully implemented, the new ERP system may not deliver the anticipated benefits, including improved productivity, cost savings, enhanced data visibility, or improved customer service capabilities. Although we carefully plan for intelligent integration of our acquisitions with our legacy businesses, there is no assurance that we will adequately resolve the issues presented by operating multiple disparate systems, or that we will successfully integrate technology across the Company.
In addition to our ERP initiative, we are pursuing opportunities to integrate artificial intelligence into our business operations, including in the recruiting, applicant tracking, screening, assessment, workforce analytics, and talent management domains. While these AI tools are intended to improve efficiency and services quality, they depend on data quality, algorithmic accuracy, and ongoing maintenance and refinement. Additionally, the rapid evolution of AI technology may require substantial and ongoing investment to remain competitive, and our competitors or new market entrants may deploy superior AI capabilities that erode our market position. If we are unable to successfully implement AI tools that meet customer expectations, fail to identify and adapt to changing talent or customer market demands related to AI, or face regulatory restrictions on AI use in employment contexts, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Some of the initiatives are dependent on the products and services of third-party vendors. If our vendors are unable to provide these services, or fail to meet our standards and expectations, we could experience business interruptions or data loss which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Any delays in completing, or an inability to successfully complete, these technology initiatives, or an inability to achieve the anticipated efficiencies, could adversely affect our operations, liquidity and financial condition.
Our information technology strategy focuses on improvements to our technology stack across the company, including synergies in our applicant onboarding and tracking systems, order management system, and improvements to financial processes. We do not currently use a single enterprise resource planning ("ERP") system, which limits our ability to react to evolving technology and customer expectations and increases the amount of investment and effort necessary to provide global service integration to our customers. Although we carefully plan for intelligent integration of our acquisitions with our legacy businesses, there is no assurance that we will adequately resolve the issues presented by lack of a single ERP, or that we will successfully integrate technology across the Company. Although the technology strategy is intended to increase productivity and operating efficiencies, these initiatives may not yield their intended results. Any delays in completing, or an inability to successfully complete, these technology initiatives, or an inability to achieve the anticipated efficiencies, could adversely affect our operations, liquidity and financial condition. Some of the initiatives are dependent on the products and services of third-party vendors. If our vendors are unable to provide these services, or fail to meet our standards and expectations, we could experience business interruptions or data loss which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our international operations subject us to potential liability under anti-bribery, anti-corruption, anti-trafficking, supply chain, trade protection,protection and other laws and regulations.
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws and regulations ("“Anti-Corruption Laws"”) prohibit corrupt payments by our employees, vendors, or agents. Other international laws and compacts hold companies liable for human rights violations that occur within their supply chain,chain and impose obligations on companies to prohibit human trafficking, forced labor,labor and child labor ("“Human Rights and Supply Chain Laws"”). While we devote substantial resources to our global compliance programs and have implemented policies, training,training and internal controls designed to reduce the risk of corrupt payments and ensure compliance with human rights standards, our employees, directors, officers, vendors, or agents may violate our policies. Our failure to comply with Anti-Corruption Laws or Human Rights and Supply Chain Laws could result in significant fines and penalties, criminal sanctions against us, our directors, officers, employees, agents, or our vendors, prohibitions on the conduct of our business,business and damage to our reputation. Operations outside the United States may be affected by changes in trade protection laws, policies and measures,measures and other regulatory requirements affecting trade and investment. As a result, we may be subject to legal liability and reputational damage.
Events such as natural disasters, severe weather, terrorist attacks, war, pandemics,pandemics and other catastrophic events could decrease demand for our services in impacted areas.
We are subject to substantial pressure to meet external stakeholder’s sustainability and ESG requirements.
Influential investors, regulators, customers, and advocacy groups have increasingly focused on evaluating environmental,the social, and governance ("ESG")sustainability commitments of companies in which they invest. While we have made public sustainability commitments, our customers often require us to comply with their ESG requirements as part of their own practices. These enhanced expectations from our customers around ESGsustainability practices can increase operating costs and require incremental resources to satisfy. Our inability to meet customer ESG or sustainability requirements could also result in the possible loss of major customer accounts. Although we maintain a sustainability program that we believe currently matches or exceeds our customer demands, there can be no guarantee that our program will be able to adequately meet future regulatory or customer requirements or that we will meet our established commitments.
As we aim to expand the number of clients utilizing our higher margin specialty solutions in support of our growth strategy, we are highly reliant on individuals who possess specialized knowledge and skills to lead related specialty solutions and operations. Social, political and financial conditions can negatively impact the availability of qualified personnel. Competition for individuals with proven specialized knowledge and skills is intense,intense and demand for these individuals is expected to remain strong in the foreseeable future. Our success is dependent on our ability to attract, develop and retain these employees.
We depend on our and our suppliers' ability to attract qualified personnel who possess the skills and experience necessary to meet the workforce demands of our customers. We must continually evaluate our base of available qualified personnel and suppliers to keep pace with changing customer needs. Competition for individuals with established professional skills is fierce,fierce and demand for these individuals is anticipated to remain robust for the foreseeable future. Rapid evolution of technology may widen the skills gap, where the demand for expertise outpaces the availability of suitably skilled professionals. The shifts in workforce demographics, including new generations entering the labor market with different expectations around flexibility, career development, and work-life balance, may make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified talent. Low unemployment, periods of reduced job movement or hiring activity, as well as social, political and financial conditions can negatively impact the amount of qualified personnel available to meet the talent requirements of our customers. There can be no assurance that qualified personnel will continue to be available in sufficient numbers and on terms of employment acceptable to us and our customers.
The proliferation of artificial intelligence-enhanced application materials and fraudulent candidates, including those potentially sponsored by hostile actors, creates operational challenges and exposes us to legal, reputational, and security risks.
The widespread availability of artificial intelligence tools has altered the candidate recruitment and screening landscape, creating operational challenges for our business. AI technologies enable candidates to rapidly generate resumes, cover letters, skills assessment responses, and interview answers that may misrepresent their actual qualifications, experience, and capabilities. The growing use of AI by candidates has made it increasingly difficult and costly to identify qualified candidates and assess true competencies.
Candidates may use AI to optimize their resumes for applicant tracking systems, fabricate work histories, exaggerate technical skills, or perform well in initial screenings despite lacking the actual abilities required for the positions. If we place candidates whose qualifications have been misrepresented through AI assistance, and those individuals fail to perform adequately or cause harm to our clients' operations, we may face damage to client relationships, customer loss, and harm to our reputation.
We also face emerging threats from individuals sponsored or directed by hostile nation-states or criminal organizations. These actors may use stolen identities, deepfake technology for video interviews, AI-generated documentation, and other advanced techniques to secure placement in customer organizations with the intent to steal intellectual property, commit fraud, conduct corporate espionage, facilitate cyberattacks, or generate revenue for sanctioned regimes or criminal enterprises. Government agencies have specifically warned about organized schemes involving nationals from foreign countries seeking remote employment at U.S. and international companies while concealing their true identities and locations.
If we inadvertently place individuals engaged in such schemes, or such individuals are placed by suppliers in our MSPs, we could face severe consequences including violations of international sanctions laws and export control regulations, criminal and civil liability, customer loss, government investigations, substantial fines and penalties, reputational damage, and difficulty obtaining or maintaining government contracts.
While we continue to invest in training, enhanced screening procedures, verification technologies, background checks, and fraud detection capabilities, the sophistication of AI tools and the resources available to criminal enterprises and nation-state actors may exceed our detection capabilities. The rapidly evolving nature of these threats means our countermeasures may not keep pace with emerging tactics. These challenges could materially increase our operating costs, reduce our screening effectiveness, expose us to significant legal and financial liability, and damage our competitive position and brand value.
Many business processes critical to our continued operation are hosted in outsourced facilities in America, Europe and Asia, hosted at our corporate headquarters or, increasingly, occur in cloud-based computer environments. We rely on key cloud and Software as a Service (“SaaS”) providers to support critical business processes. These critical processes include, but are not limited to, payroll, customer reporting,reporting and order management. Although we have taken steps to protect such instances by establishing data backup and disaster recovery capabilities, thea losssecurity incident, outage, or inabilityoperational failure affecting these providers, or a misconfiguration or integration issue involving our environments, impair our ability to accessserve ofcustomers thisand datacandidates, or cloud environment couldand create a substantial risk of business interruption which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In the normal course of business we control, process, or have access to personal data regarding candidates and persons employed or engaged by us, our customers, certain customer employees,employees and managed suppliers. Information concerning these individuals may also reside in systems controlled by third parties for purposes such as employee benefits, assignment information,information and payroll administration. The legal and regulatory environment concerning data privacy is becoming more complex and challenging,challenging and the potential consequences of non-compliance have become more severe. The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation, the California Consumer Privacy Act, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ("“HIPAA"”), and similar laws impose additional compliance requirements related to the collection, use, processing, transfer, disclosure, security,security and retention of personal or protected health information ("“PHI"”), which can increase operating costs and resources to accomplish. The further expansion of privacy laws,laws and litigation for violations of those laws, including at a state-level in the United States, could make it more difficult or expensive for us to provide services and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Any failure to abide by these regulations or to protect such personal information or PHI from inappropriate access or disclosure, whether through social engineering or by accident or other cause, could have severe consequences including fines, litigation, regulatory sanctions, reputational damage,damage and loss of customers or employees. Although we have a privacy compliance program designed to preserve the privacy and rights of the individuals whose personal data we control or process, as well as personal data that we entrust to third parties, there can be no assurance that our program will meet all current and future regulatory requirements, anticipate all potential methods of unauthorized access, or prevent all inappropriate disclosures. Our insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover all such costs or consequences,consequences and there can be no assurance that any insurance that we now maintain will remain available under acceptable terms.
We rely upon multiple information technology systems and networks, some of which are web-based or managed by third parties or open source, to process, transmit,transmit and store electronic information and to manage or support a variety of critical business processes and activities. Our networks and applications are increasingly accessed from locations and by devices not within our physical control,control and the specifics of our technology systems and networks may vary by geographic region. In the course of ordinary business, we may store or process proprietary or confidential information concerning our business and financial performance and current, past or prospective employees, customers, vendors and managed suppliers. The secure and consistent operation of these systems, networks and processes is critical to our business operations. Moreover, our workers may be exposed to, or have access to, similar information in the course of their customer assignments. We routinely experience cyberattacks, which may include the use or attempted use of malware, ransomware, computer viruses, phishing, social engineering schemes and other means of attempted disruption or unauthorized access. Advanced social engineering and impersonation techniques by criminal organizations and nation-state adversaries for the purposes of espionage, data theft, or system disruption have sought to exploit information technology job opportunities at many companies. Although we have not experienced a material attack of this nature, because our services involve providing talent solutions for theseinformation technology roles, we are at increased risk for this advanced type of attack, whether directly or through a supplier in our MSP services.
Additionally, the rapid pace of change in information security and cyber security threats could result in a heightened threat level for us or companies in our industry without notice. The potential risk increases as we expand and publicize new services. In addition to cyberattacks, our systems and services are vulnerable to damage or disruption from technology or software failures, errors by our employees or our vendors, power outages, natural disasters, extreme weather, conflicts, or other unforeseen events, which could disrupt our business operations. Our relationships with third parties, including suppliers we manage, customers,customers and vendors, create potential avenues for malicious actors to initiate a supply chain attack. Even in instances where we are not a target of a malicious actor, we could be exposed to risk due to our relationships and business processes with these third parties.
The actions we take to reduce the risk of impairments to our operations or systems and breaches of confidential or proprietary data may not be sufficient to prevent or repel future cyber events or other impairments of our networks or information technologies, especially as cyberattacks become more sophisticated with advances in artificial intelligence. An event involving the destruction, modification, accidental or unauthorized release, or theft of sensitive information from systems related to our business, or an attack that results in damage to or unavailability of our key technology systems or those of critical vendors (e.g., ransomware), could result in damage to our reputation, fines, regulatory sanctions or interventions, contractual or financial liabilities, additional compliance and remediation costs, loss of employees or customers, loss of payment card network privileges, operational disruptions and other forms of costs, losses or reimbursements, any of which could materially adversely affect our operations or financial condition. Our cyber security and business continuity plans,plans and those of our third parties with whom we do business, may not be effective in anticipating, preventing and effectively responding to all potential cyber risk exposures. Cyberattacks, even if unsuccessful, may damage or disrupt our systems and services or require us to take actions to protect our systems that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover all such costs or consequences,consequences and there can be no assurance that any insurance that we now maintain will remain available under acceptable terms.
The Terence E. Adderley Revocable Trust K ("Trust K"), which became irrevocable upon the death of Terence E. Adderley on October 9, 2018, is our controlling stockholder. In accordance with the provisions of Trust K, William U. Parfet, David M. Hempstead and Andrew H. Curoe were appointed as successor trustees of the trust. Mr. Parfet is the brother of Donald R. Parfet, a member of the board of directors of the Company. The trustees, acting by majority vote, have sole investment and voting power over the shares of our Class B common stock held by Trust K, which represent approximately 95.3% of the outstanding Class B shares. The voting rights of our Class B common stock are perpetual, and our Class B common stock is not subject to transfer restrictions or mandatory conversion obligations under our certificate of incorporation or bylaws.
We have a controlling stockholder that beneficially owns 92.2% of our outstanding Class B shares. Our Class B common stock is the only class of our common stock entitled to voting rights. The trusteesvoting rights of Trustour KClass B common stock are thereforeperpetual and our Class B common stock is not subject to transfer restrictions or mandatory conversion obligations under our certificate of incorporation or bylaws. Our controlling shareholder therefore, is able to exercise voting control with respect to all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election or removal from office of all members of the Company’s board of directors.
We are not subject to certain of the listing standards that normally apply to companies whose shares are quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select Market.
Our Class A and Class B common stock are quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. Under the listing standards of the Nasdaq Global Select Market, we are deemed to be a “controlled company” due to Trustour Kcontrolling shareholder having voting power with respect to more than fifty percent of our outstanding voting stock. A controlled company is not required to have a majority of its board of directors comprised of independent directors. Director nominees are not required to be selected or recommended for the board’s selection by a majority of independent directors or a nominations committee comprised solely of independent directors, nor do the Nasdaq Global Select Market listing standards require a controlled company to certify the adoption of a formal written charter or board resolution, as applicable, addressing the nominations process. A controlled company is also exempt from the Nasdaq Global Select Market’s requirements regarding the determination of officer compensation by a majority of independent directors or a compensation committee comprised solely of independent directors. A controlled company is required to have an audit committee composed of at least three directors who are independent as defined under the rules of both the SEC and the Nasdaq Global Select Market. The Nasdaq Global Select Market further requires that all members of the audit committee have the ability to read and understand fundamental financial statements and that at least one member of the audit committee possess financial sophistication. The independent directors must also meet at least twice a year in meetings at which only they are present.
As a “controlled company” under Nasdaq Global Select Market listing standards, we have elected to rely on the controlled company exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements. As a result, we are not required to (i) have director nominees selected or recommended to our board of directors by independent directors (either through a committee composed entirely of independent directors or by a majority of the independent directors on our board of directors) or (ii) have a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors. Accordingly, the protections that these requirements are intended to provide may not be available to our stockholders, and our controlling stockholder may be able to exert significant influence over matters such as director nominations and executive compensation. In the future, we may elect to rely on additional controlled company exemptions (including exemptions relating to board and committee independence), to the extent we continue to qualify as a controlled company.
Under our certificate of incorporation, the holders of shares of our Class A common stock are not entitled to voting rights, except as otherwise required by Delaware law. Furthermore, pursuant to a Letter Agreement dated January 30, 2026, between the Company and Hunt Equity Opportunities, LLC (“Hunt”), for a period of three years following the closing of Hunt’s purchase of Class B common stock, certain “controlling stockholder transactions” (including “going private transactions”) must be approved by the holders of Class A common stock and Class B common stock voting together as a single class. In these specific and limited circumstances, each holder of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote per share, excluding any stockholders that have a material interest in the transaction or a material relationship with Hunt. As a result, Class A common stockholders do not otherwise have the right to vote for the election of directors or in connection with most other matters submitted for the vote of our stockholders, including most mergers and certain other business combination transactions involving the Company. See Subsequent Events footnote in the notes to our consolidated financial statements for additional details.
We currently comply with the listing standards of the Nasdaq Global Market that do not apply to controlled companies. Our compliance is voluntary, however, and there can be no assurance that we will continue to comply with these standards in the future.
At our 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we expect to seek stockholder approval of an amendment to our certificate of incorporation that would (i) permit stockholder action by written consent, (ii) allow the Chairman of our Board to call special meetings of stockholders, (iii) allow a majority of the holders of our Class B common stock to call special meetings of stockholders, and (iv) permit stockholders to fill vacancies or newly created directorships. If approved, these changes would reduce certain impediments to stockholder action contained in our current organizational documents and could, depending on the circumstances, either facilitate or deter third-party acquisition efforts.
Under our certificate of incorporation, the holders of shares of our Class A common stock are not entitled to voting rights, except as otherwise required by Delaware law. As a result, Class A common stockholders do not have the right to vote for the election of directors or in connection with most other matters submitted for the vote of our stockholders, including mergers and certain other business combination transactions involving the Company.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
Largest changes
“OCG reported profit in 2023, compared to a loss in 2022. The change was primarily due to the impact of the 2022 $41.0 million charge related to the impairment of goodwill of RocketPower, the impact of a $2.0 million ROU asset impairment charge in the second quarter of 2023, the impact of restructuring charges and the impact of lower revenue and gross profit.”see in full comparison
“We completed our annual impairment test for all reporting units with goodwill in the fourth quarter of 2025. Pursuant to the segment changes in first quarter of 2025, the goodwill reporting units were reassessed (see the Segment Disclosures footnote in the notes to our consolidated financial statements). As of year-end 2025, the Company determined that there are three reporting units with assigned goodwill. The three reporting units tested in the fourth quarter of 2025 were SET, Education and RPO. …”see in full comparison
“Our quantitative analyses used significant assumptions, including: expected future revenue growth rates, profit margins and discount rate. Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we have made are reasonable and appropriate, different assumptions and estimates could materially impact our reported financial results. Different assumptions of the anticipated future results and growth from our business could result in an impairment charge, which would decrease operating income and result in lower asset values on our consolidated balance sheet. …”see in full comparison
“During the second half of 2022, customers within the high-tech industry vertical, in which RocketPower specializes, reduced or eliminated their full-time hiring, reducing demand for RocketPower’s services, and on-going economic uncertainty had more broadly impacted the growth in demand for RPO in the near-term. These changes in market conditions therefore caused triggering events requiring interim impairment tests for both long-lived assets and goodwill as of the third and fourth quarters of 2022. …”see in full comparison
“We completed our annual impairment test for all reporting units with goodwill in the fourth quarter for the fiscal year ended 2022. We performed a step one quantitative test for the Softworld and PTS reporting units. As a result of the quantitative assessment, we determined that the estimated fair value of the Softworld and PTS reporting units was more than its carrying value. …”see in full comparison
“As a measure of sensitivity for the fair value for Softworld reporting unit, while holding all other assumptions constant, an increase in the discount rate of 75 basis points or a decrease of 75 basis points in the revenue growth rate assumptions for each forecasted period used to determine the fair value of the reporting unit would result in additional goodwill impairment of approximately $9.9 million and $8.8 million, respectively. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (128)
In 2025, Kelly continued to advance its multi-year transformation, building on the decisive actions taken in 2023 and 2024 to streamline the portfolio, sharpen strategic focus, and expand into higher-margin, higher-growth specialties. We remained focused on capturing a greater share of growth, converting a higher proportion of revenue into bottom-line performance, and positioning Kelly to benefit from an eventual recovery in the staffing environment.
Kelly entered 2025 with a simplified operating model concentrated on North American staffing, business process outsourcing (“BPO”) and specialty solutions and global Managed Service Provider (“MSP”) and recruitment process outsourcing (“RPO”) offerings, following the 2024 sale of its European staffing operations and the Ayers Group and acquisition of Motion Recruitment Partners (“MRP”) and Children’s Therapy Center (“CTC”). These portfolio actions reflected a deliberate shift toward businesses with more attractive growth profiles, scalable platforms, and improved EBITDA margin potential.
We continued to execute our refreshed go-to-market strategy, designed to deliver the full suite of Kelly solutions to large enterprise customers and capture a greater share of wallet while maintaining high service levels for customers of all sizes. This strategy was supported by ongoing commitment to delivering greater effectiveness and data-driven sales processes and initiatives.
Critical to positioning Kelly for future growth was the hiring of Chris Layden as President and Chief Executive Officer in September 2025. Layden succeeded Peter Quigley, who announced his intention to retire in February 2025. Layden brings dynamic industry leadership and extensive experience leading organizations through periods of significant change, while delivering growth and strengthening competitive positioning. Layden’s hiring underscores Kelly’s commitment to enhancing its operational capabilities and service delivery while transforming its technology processes and platforms.
During 2025, Kelly faced a dynamic macroeconomic environment characterized by sluggish labor market demand and policy shifts which had significant impacts on the industry, including Kelly. In the face of these headwinds, Kelly demonstrated measurable progress in cost discipline and selective market strength. At the same time, we accelerated structural and demand-driven cost optimization initiatives, including technology modernization, acquisition integration and process efficiencies to enhance execution and agility while positioning Kelly to capture market share and improve profitability when staffing market conditions stabilize.
Structural cost actions, operating model simplification, acquisition integration and portfolio reshaping are expected to support continued improvement in Kelly’s growth prospects and financial profile as we move through 2026 and beyond.
While the challenging staffing market dynamics that developed in 2023 continued into 2024, we have remained focused on capturing a greater share of growth where it exists and converting a greater share of our revenue to bottom-line growth by continuing to enhance efficiency and focus across the Company.
We continue to build on the goals of our transformation activities and the aggressive actions we took in 2023 to improve Kelly’s profitability and accelerate growth over the long term. Our business unit and enterprise function teams, together with the Transformation Management Office, continue to make progress on multiple initiatives to drive organizational efficiency and effectiveness.
We are also committed to finding new avenues of growth. This includes a refreshed go-to-market strategy with a comprehensive approach to delivering the full suite of Kelly solutions to our large enterprise customers that is intended to capture a greater share of wallet as we move through 2025. We also remain committed to delivering the highest quality of service to all customers regardless of spend or size. In our P&I segment, for example, we have enhanced our local delivery model and rolled out our Kelly Now mobile application across the U.S. to meet the needs of both our clients and our talent.
We completed the sale of our European staffing operations on January 2, 2024 and on June 12, 2024 announced the sale of the Ayers Group, a division of our OCG segment. We move forward with a streamlined operating model focused on North American staffing and solutions and global Managed Service Provider ("MSP") and recruitment process outsourcing ("RPO") solutions.
To further expand our higher-margin, higher-growth specialties, we acquired Motion Recruitment Partners, LLC ("MRP") on May 31, 2024. The acquisition of MRP enhanced the scale and capabilities of Kelly’s staffing and consulting solutions across technology, telecommunications, and government specialties in North America, and RPO solutions globally. In addition, we remained focused on expanding the higher-margin therapy practice in our Education segment, evidenced by the November 2024 acquisition of Children’s Therapy Center ("CTC").
Together these changes represent structural shifts in Kelly’s operations and deliver meaningful improvement to the Company’s growth prospects and EBITDA margin profile, which we expect to continue as we move forward in 2025 and beyond.
Reported percentage changes are computed based on millions. Prior year percent changes were computed based on actual amounts in thousands. Prior year percent changes have been recast to conform to the new presentation which is calculated based on millions. All dollar amounts are presented in millions except for per share data.
Reported percentage changes were computed based on actual amounts in thousands of dollars.
EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) and EBITDA margin (EBITDA divided by revenue from services) are measures used for understanding the Company's ability to generate cash flow and for judging overall operating performance. EBITDA measures are non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) measures and are used to supplement measures in accordance with GAAP. Our non-GAAP measures may be calculated differently from those provided by other companies, limiting their usefulness for comparison purposes. Non-GAAP measures should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.
In the segment level discussions that follow the total company discussion, the comparative results for 20232024 and 20222023 have been recast to conform to the new structurestructure. inOur operating segments, which also represent our Mexicoreportable operationssegments, wereare transferredbased on the organizational structure for which financial results are regularly evaluated by our chief operating decision-maker (“CODM”, our CEO) to ourdetermine Professionalresource & Industrial ("P&I") segment following the sale of our EMEA staffing operationsallocation and toassess reflect our updated corporate allocation method.performance.
We combined our former P&I and OCG segments into the ETM segment in the first quarter of 2025, responding to a shift in customer demand toward integrated workforce solutions and enabling a more streamlined and efficient go-to-market approach. We also realigned certain customers from the SET segment to the ETM segment to support this integrated strategy. Also in the first quarter of 2025, we moved MRP's Sevenstep business from the SET segment to the ETM segment as part of the broader integration of MRP. The 2024 and 2023 ETM and SET segment information has been recast to conform to the new structure.
Our three reportable segments: (1) Enterprise Talent Management, (2) Science, Engineering & Technology and (3) Education, reflect the specialty services we provide to customers and represent how the business is organized internally.
Revenue from services decreased 10.4%,1.9% whichyear-over-year primarilywith reflectsdecreases in the JanuaryETM 2,and 2024SET sale of our EMEA staffing operations,segments, partially offset by an increase relatedin tothe Education segment and by the acquisition of MRP in May 2024. Excluding the impact from the sale and the acquisition, revenue from services increaseddecreased 0.5%. This increase reflects revenue increases in the Education and Outsourcing & Consulting ("OCG") segments, partially offset by declines in the P&I and Science, Engineering & Technology ("SET") segments.6.2%. Compared to 2023last year and excluding the impact from the sale and acquisition, revenue from staffing services increaseddecreased 1.7%6.0% and revenue from outcome-based services decreased 3.2%.9.4% Infrom addition,the revenueprior year. Revenue from talent solutions increased 3.0%1.1% and permanent placement revenue decreased 24.2%20.9% from the prior year, excluding the impact from the sale and the acquisition.
Gross profit decreased 8.2%3.4% largelyon drivenlower byrevenue the sale of our EMEA staffing operations,volume, partially offset by an increase related to the acquisition of MRP. Excluding the impact from the sale and the acquisition, gross profit decreased 4.7%.9.7%. The gross profit rate increaseddecreased 0.530 basis points to 20.4%20.1% and was favorably impacted by the sale of our EMEA staffing operations and the acquisition of MRP. Excluding the impact from the sale and the acquisition, the gross profit rate declined 11070 basis points. The decrease is due primarily to changes in business mixmix, higher employee-related costs and a decrease inlower permanent placement revenue. Permanent placement revenue has higher gross profit due to very low direct costs of services and thus has a disproportionate impact on gross profit rates. The gross profit rate decreased in allthe ETM and SET segments excludingand had a slight increase in the saleEducation and the acquisition.segment.
Total selling, general and administrative ("“SG&A"”) expenses decreasedincreased 12.4%,0.9%, includingprimarily thedue sale of our EMEA staffing operations andto the acquisition of MRP. Excluding thesethe impacts,impact of the acquisition, SG&A expenses decreased 8.6%.4.8%. Included in SG&A expenses in 2025 were $27.8 million of integration and realignment costs related to initiatives to integrate MRP and other prior acquisitions, consolidating operating segments and further aligning processes and technology. Also included in SG&A was $2.7 million of executive transition charges and $0.8 million of transaction costs. Included in SG&A expenses in 2024 and 2023 were $6.1 million and $38.6 million of restructuring and transformation charges, respectively. Actions taken in both periods were a continuation of the actions that were announced in the second quarter of 2023 as part of the comprehensive transformation initiative. In addition, restructuring actions taken in the first quarter of 2023 reflected management undertaking actions to further our cost management efforts in response to the demand levels and reflected a repositioning of our P&I staffing business to better capitalize on opportunities in local markets. SG&A expenses in 2024 also include $17.9 million of transaction-relatedtransaction costs arising from the sale of our EMEA staffing operations and acquisition of MRP, $10.0 million of integration costs related to initiatives to integrate MRP and aligning Company processes and technology, $6.1 million of restructuring and transformation costs and $2.3 million of executive transition charges. Excluding the impact of the sale and acquisition, as well as transaction, integration, restructuring and executive transition charges—and excluding depreciation and amortization—SG&A expenses decreased 8.5%4.7% primarily due to momentum on structural workforceand reductionsdemand-driven asexpense partoptimization of our transformation initiatives, as well as proactive resource managementinitiatives and lower variable, performance-based incentive compensation expenses in response to lower revenue volume. Depreciation and amortization represents the total company depreciation and amortization of intangibles, including the amortization of hosted software.
The gain on sale of EMEA staffing operations relates to the completion of the sale in January 2024 in which we recognized a gain of $1.6 million in 2024. The $5.4 million gain on sale of assets in 2024 represents the sale of the Company's Ayers Group in the second quarter of 2024.
ImpairmentThe goodwill impairment charge in 2025 was primarily driven by reduced demand, integration of assetsMRP and Softworld acquisitions and the realignment of reporting units in 2024 represents the impairmentSET of certain right-of-use ("ROU") assets related to our leased headquarters facility.segment. The goodwill impairment charge in 2024 relatesrelated to our Softworld reporting unit which delivers technology staffing and workforce services and is included in the SET segment. Changes in internal projections of financial performance due to continued challenging market conditions resulted in a lower estimated fair value for the reporting unit and an impairment charge of $102.0 million and $72.8 million.million Impairmentfor 2025 and 2024, respectively. The impairment of assets in 20232024 represents the impairment of certain right-of-use (“ROU”) assets related to anour unoccupiedleased officeheadquarters space lease exited in the second quarter.facility.
Loss from operations in 20242025 totaled $15.1$69.8 million, compared to earningsa loss from operations of $24.3$15.1 million in 2023.2024. The decrease is primarily related to the goodwill impairment charge,charges, higherincreased assetcosts impairmentfor chargesintegration, realignment and restructuring activities, the impact of lower revenue comparedand togross theprofits priorand year, partially offset by the impact of lowerhigher SG&A as compared to the prior year, the gain on sale of Ayers Group and the gain on sale of our EMEA staffing operations.year.
Income tax expense was $175.3 million in 2025 compared to an income tax benefit of $21.3 million in 2024. The 2025 expense was impacted by $197.6 million of federal and state valuation allowances established against U.S. general business credit carryforwards and other deferred tax assets, and a $6.2 million impact from a non-tax deductible goodwill impairment charge. This was offset by an $18.4 million benefit from the impairment of tax-deductible goodwill. In 2024, the benefit was driven by an $18.4 million tax benefit from the impairment of tax-deductible goodwill.
Income tax benefit was $21.3 million in 2024 compared to an income tax benefit of $11.5 million in 2023. 2024 benefited from lower pretax earnings, which included an $18.5 million tax benefit from the impairment of tax-deductible goodwill. 2023 benefited from recording a $15.0 million benefit on outside basis difference in held for sale assets, offset by a net $4.4 million charge for valuation allowance changes.
Our tax benefit or expense is affected by recurring items, such as the amount of pretax income and its mix by jurisdiction, U.S. work opportunity credits and the change in cash surrender value of non-taxable investments in life insurance policies. It is also affected by discrete items that may occur in any given period but are not consistent from period to period, such as tax law changes or changes in judgment regarding the realizability of deferred tax assets.
The net loss for 2024 was $0.6 million, compared to net earnings of $36.4 million in 2023.
ETM revenue includes the impact from the acquisition of Sevenstep, the MRP talent solutions business. Revenue excluding the acquisition decreased 9.1%. Revenue from staffing services decreased 11.7%, resulting from lower demand primarily at certain large customers and revenue from outcome-based services decreased 12.1%, primarily due to the ramping down of a large contact-center customer that has fully ended as of the third quarter of 2025, which was offset by an increase of 1.1% in talent solutions, excluding the acquisition.
The decrease in P&I revenue from services was due primarily to a 5.6% decline in staffing services resulting from lower hours volume, partially offset by higher bill rates. Revenue from outcome-based services decreased 1.4% due to lower demand for our call-center solutions, partially offset by higher revenue from other specialties.
The increase in SET revenue from services was primarily driven by the acquisition of MRP instaffing Mayand 2024.outcome-based solutions businesses. Excluding the acquisition, revenue from services decreased 4.5%,9.3%, primarily duedriven by lower staffing services demand related to declinesU.S. infederal hoursgovernment volume in our staffing specialties, partially offset by higher bill rates.contractors. Excluding the acquisition, revenuesrevenue fromin our outcome-based services decreased 5.5%. Permanent placement fees decreased, reflecting continued lower market demand.
The increase in Education revenue from services was driven by the impact of higher fill rates and higher bill rates on stable demand for our services as compared to a year ago, partially offset by the impact of weather-related school closures early in the year.
The decrease in ETM revenue from services was due primarily to a 3.9% decline in staffing services resulting from lower demand, partially offset by higher bill rates. Revenue from outcome-based services decreased 0.9% due to lower demand for our call-center solutions, partially offset by higher revenue from other specialties.
The increase in SET revenue from services was driven by the acquisition of MRP in May 2024. Excluding the acquisition, revenue from services decreased 6.6%, primarily due to lower demand in our staffing specialties, partially offset by higher bill rates. Excluding the acquisition, revenues from outcome-based services decreased 6.3%.
The increase in OCG revenue from services was driven by increased demand in payroll process outsourcing ("PPO"), partially offset by declines in RPO and MSP.
International reflects the sale of our EMEA staffing operations in January 2024 and the transfer of our Mexico operations to our P&IETM segment. The P&I segment information for 2023 has been recast to conform to the new structure.
The decrease in P&I revenue from services was due primarily to a 17.5% decline in staffing services resulting from lower hours volume, partially offset by higher bill rates. Revenue from outcome-based services increased 13.6% due to the expansion of existing customers.
The decrease in SET revenue from services was driven by a decline in staffing services resulting from declines in hours volume in our staffing specialties, partially offset by higher bill rates. Revenues from outcome-based services increased 3.7% and permanent placement fees were down 40.2%.
The increase in Education revenue from services includes the impact of the acquisition of PTS in May 2022. Excluding the acquisition, revenue increased 29.8% reflecting an increased fill rate and an increased demand for our services from existing customers and from net new customer wins.
The decrease in OCG revenue from services includes the revenue from the acquisition of RocketPower in March 2022. Excluding the acquisition, revenue decreased 3.4% due primarily to lower RPO and MSP revenue.
The decrease in International revenue from services was primarily the result of the sale of our Russian operations in July 2022 and lower volume in several geographies, partially offset by favorable foreign currency fluctuations.
Gross profit for the P&I segment decreased on lower revenue volume. In comparison to the prior year, the gross profit rate decreased 20 basis points primarily due to declines in permanent placement revenue and business mix which were partially offset by lower employee-related costs.
SET gross profit increased resulting from the acquisition of MRP, partially offset by the decrease in revenue volume in other components of the segment. The gross profit rate increased 120 basis points due to the acquisition of MRP which generates higher gross profit rates. This impact was partially offset by a 40 basis point decrease in the gross profit rate in other components of SET reflecting business mix and lower permanent placement fees, partially offset by lower employee-related costs.
Gross profit for the Education segment increased on higher revenue volume. The gross profit rate decreased 90 basis points due primarily to customer mix, lower permanent placement fees and higher employee-related costs.
OCG gross profit decreased with a decrease in the gross profit rate. The gross profit rate decreased 480 basis points primarily due to a change in business mix within this segment as a result of strong growth in PPO. The unfavorable business mix was primarily driven by declines in revenue in RPO and MSP, which generate higher margins and improving PPO revenue which generates lower margins.
International reflects the sale of our EMEA staffing operations in January 2024 and the transfer of our Mexico operations to our P&I segment. The P&I segment information for 2023 has been recast to conform to the new structure.
Gross profit for the P&IETM segment decreased on lower revenue volumevolume. combinedFactors with a decrease in the gross profit rate. In comparison to the prior year,impacting the gross profit rate decreased 30 basis points. This decrease reflects lower permanent placement income andincluded higher employee-related costs,costs partiallyand offsetchanges in business mix, which reduced the gross profit rate by favorable70 businessbasis mix.points.
SET gross profit increased primarily due to the acquisition of MRP. The change in the SET gross profit rate was driven by a 50 basis point decrease reflecting the impact of changes in business mix and higher employee-related costs and a 50 basis point decrease as a result of lower permanent placement revenue, partially offset by a 70 basis point increase due to the MRP acquisition, which generates higher gross profit rates.
SET grossGross profit decreasedfor the Education segment increased on lowerhigher revenue volume. The gross profit rate decreasedincreased 7010 basis points due to lower permanentemployee-related placement revenues,costs, partially offset by favorablechanges in business mix.
Gross profit for the EducationETM segment increaseddecreased on higherlower revenue volume. TheIn comparison to the prior year, the gross profit rate decreased 5070 basis points primarily due primarilyto tochanges in business mix and lower permanent placement fees and unfavorable customer mix,revenue, partially offset by lower employee-related costs.
SET gross profit increased resulting from the acquisition of MRP, partially offset by the decrease in revenue volume in other components of the segment. The gross profit rate increased 80 basis points due to the acquisition of MRP, which generates higher gross profit rates. This impact was partially offset by a 60 basis point decrease in the gross profit rate in other components of SET reflecting changes in business mix and lower permanent placement revenue, partially offset by lower employee-related costs.
OCG grossGross profit decreasedfor the Education segment increased on lowerhigher revenue volume, combined with a decrease in the gross profit rate.volume. The gross profit rate decreased 3090 basis points due primarily drivento by declineschanges in business mix, lower permanent placement revenue in RPO and MSP, which generate higher margins.employee-related costs.
International reflects the sale of our EMEA staffing operations in January 2024 and the transfer of our Mexico operations to our ETM segment.
International gross profit decreased primarily as a result of the sale of our Russian operations in July 2022 and the servicing of certain customer programs by OCG in 2023. Partially offsetting these impacts was improving gross profit primarily driven by higher revenue volume in Portugal and Germany as well as favorable foreign currency fluctuations.
The decrease in total SG&A expenses excluding depreciation and amortization in P&I includes the impact of restructuring and transformation charges. Excluding restructuring and transformation charges of $0.3 million in 2024 and $6.7 million in 2023, the decrease is 10.9%. The decrease excluding restructuring and transformation charges is primarily due to lower direct salaries as a result of cost management in response to lower revenue volume compared to the prior year, as well as the impact of transformation-related actions. Other segment expenses declined primarily due to lower shared service costs for IT, finance, human resources and legal support and lower facilities and equipment-related costs.
The increasedecrease in totalETM SG&A expenses excluding depreciation and amortization in SET is due to the MRP acquisition. Excluding the impact from the acquisition, expenses decreased 9.8% from the prior yearwas primarily due to lower shared servicesalary-related costs whichand areperformance-based includedincentive incompensation otheras segmenta expensesresult of operating efficiencies and lowerexpense directmanagement salariesactions reflecting thein response to lower revenue volume compared to the prior year, aspartially welloffset asby the impactaddition of transformation-relatedthe actions.Sevenstep business and integration and realignment charges. Excluding the acquisition, expenses decreased 4.5% from the prior year.
The increase in SET SG&A expenses excluding depreciation and amortization was primarily related to higher employee-related costs due to the acquisition of MRP. Excluding the acquisition, expenses decreased 6.5% from the prior year due to lower shared service costs which are included in other segment expenses and lower direct salaries reflecting expense management actions in response to lower revenue volume compared to the prior year, partially offset by an increase in integration and realignment charges in 2025 as compared to prior year restructuring and transformation costs.
The increase in Education SG&A expenses excluding depreciation and amortization primarily related to increased costs to support year-over-year revenue growth.
The decrease in Corporate expenses was primarily driven by lower employee-related costs and transaction costs, partially offset by an increase in integration and realignment charges in 2025 as compared to prior year.
The decrease in total SG&A expenses excluding depreciation and amortization in ETM includes the impact of restructuring and transformation charges and the impact from the addition of the Sevenstep business. Excluding the impact of these items, expenses decreased by 10.5% primarily due to lower direct salaries as a result of cost management in response to lower revenue volume compared to the prior year, as well as the impact of transformation-related actions. Other segment expenses declined primarily due to lower shared service costs for IT, finance, human resources and legal support and lower facilities and equipment-related costs.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
We could not find a separate Risk Factors item in the latest 10-Q. Some companies leave it out of quarterly reports; see the annual 10-K risk factors and the original filing. Open the filing on SEC.gov.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Operating Results By Segment (continued)”
New heading “Operating Results By Segment (continued)”
Largest changes
“With trends stabilizing across the enterprise, we continued to execute strategic initiatives designed to drive organic growth and margin expansion. These include the formation of a Growth Office which has collaborated across the enterprise to lay the foundation for an integrated commercial operating framework. This framework unifies our go-to-market strategy, bringing our full suite of solutions to customers and increasing share of wallet and revenue growth. …”see in full comparison
“The 3.4% decrease in Corporate expenses was primarily driven by lower integration, realignment, and restructuring charges, partially offset by investment in the Growth Office and other corporate initiatives in the first six months of 2026 as compared to the prior year.”see in full comparison
“In ETM, staffing revenue excluding the discrete impacts returned to positive year-over-year growth driven by broad-based demand across customers and verticals, Business Process Outsourcing excluding contact center solutions also pivoted to growth in the quarter and Talent Solutions delivered another quarter of revenue growth as new customer wins came online and demand continued to increase. In SET, trends in each specialty vertical improved compared to the first quarter, with the Telecom specialty delivering another quarter of year-over-year growth. …”see in full comparison
“Total SG&A expenses decreased 8.7%, primarily due to expense management actions to reduce volume-related costs and reflects the benefits of the ongoing structural actions including integration and realignment efforts. SG&A expenses in the first six months of 2026 include $7.6 million of integration and realignment costs related to continuation of ongoing initiatives, $1.8 million of executive transition charges and $0.8 million of transaction costs primarily related to costs incurred in connection with our controlling shareholder change in the first quarter of 2026. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (55)
In the second quarter, we delivered sequential improvement in each business across Kelly. The discrete impact of demand reductions among three large ETM customers and the U.S. federal government, which we initially disclosed in the second quarter of 2025, is lessening but remains visible in our results. Trends among these customers who continue to do business with Kelly remained stable on a sequential basis.
In ETM, staffing revenue excluding the discrete impacts returned to positive year-over-year growth driven by broad-based demand across customers and verticals, Business Process Outsourcing excluding contact center solutions also pivoted to growth in the quarter and Talent Solutions delivered another quarter of revenue growth as new customer wins came online and demand continued to increase. In SET, trends in each specialty vertical improved compared to the first quarter, with the Telecom specialty delivering another quarter of year-over-year growth. In Education, results improved modestly on a sequential basis while we continued to experience pressure from prior year delayed contract decisions and enrollment declines. In each business, we continued to align resources with demand and maintained a disciplined approach to expense management overall as part of our ongoing focus on efficiency.
In the first quarter, we achieved results that were in line with our expectations, reflecting our ongoing focus on stabilizing the business. In ETM, revenue trends improved sequentially from the fourth quarter, driven by growth in Talent Solutions across the MSP, RPO, and PPO offerings. In SET, we delivered another quarter of year-over-year growth in our Telecom specialty, and Science & Clinical improved sequentially. In Education, we continued to experience pressure from delayed contract decisions, enrollment declines, and elevated weather-related school closures.
Our results continue to reflect reduced volumes in parts of our portfolio driven by lower demand among certain large customers and a more measured approach to hiring among employers in some sectors, primarily in response to the dynamic macroeconomic environment. The impact of demand reductions among three large customers, which we disclosed in the second quarter of 2025, remains visible in the results of ETM. Staffing volumes in SET associated with the U.S. federal government, which were materially reduced beginning in the first quarter of 2025 as a result of government efficiency actions, were stable. Throughout the first quarter, we continued to align resources with demand to address these dynamics and maintained a disciplined approach to expense management overall as part of our ongoing focus on efficiency.
With trends stabilizing across the enterprise, we continued to execute strategic initiatives designed to drive organic growth and margin expansion. These include the formation of a Growth Office which has collaborated across the enterprise to lay the foundation for an integrated commercial operating framework. This framework unifies our go-to-market strategy, bringing our full suite of solutions to customers and increasing share of wallet and revenue growth. We remained on track with our technology modernization initiative in the quarter, facilitating a smooth transition following the cutover of our acquisitions in SET from their legacy technology stack to the modernized platform we acquired through our acquisition of MRP. The learnings from the initial cutover are being applied to subsequent phases to ensure we fully realize the growth and efficiency benefits of the new technology stack.
Our ability to stabilizedeliver sequential improvement across the businessenterprise while driving progress on our strategic initiatives in the firstsecond quarter reflects our enhanced focus on execution and operational discipline. As demand trends improve, ourOur progress will position us to capitalize,capitalize on improving demand trends, and driving profitable growth and long-term value creation.
Days sales outstanding (“DSO”) represents the number of days that sales remain unpaid for the period being reported. DSO is calculated by dividing average net sales per day (based on a rolling three-month period) into trade accounts receivable, net of allowances at period end. AlthoughWhere secondary supplier revenues are recorded on a net basis (net of secondary supplier expense), secondary supplier revenue is included in the daily sales calculation in order to properly reflect the gross revenue amounts billed to the customer.
Revenue from services in the firstsecond quarter decreased 10.7%5.8% year-over-year with decreases in the ETM, SET, and Education segments. Compared to the firstsecond quarter of 2025, the decrease is primarily due to declines in revenue from staffing services andof outcome-based9.5%, servicespartially decreasedoffset 12.9%by andincreases 9.7%,in respectively. Revenuerevenue from talent solutions increasedof 3.0% and permanent placement revenue decreased 5.2%6.3% from the prior year.
Gross profit decreased 17.0%6.0% year-over-year, primarily driven by lower revenue volume. The gross profit rate decreased 1.4%10 basis points (“bps”) to 18.9%,20.4%, primarily due to higherchanges in business mix, partially offset by lower employee-related costscosts. The gross profit rate decreased in the beginningSET partand ofEducation segments and increased in the year.ETM segment.
Total SG&A expenses decreased 11.7%5.5% year-over-year, primarily due to expense management actions to reduce volume-related costscosts, and reflects the benefits of the ongoing structural actions including integration and realignment efforts. SG&A expenses in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 include $4.7$2.9 million of integration and realignment costs related to continuation of ongoing initiatives,initiatives $1.5and $0.3 million of executive transition charges and $0.8 million of transaction costs primarily related to costs incurred in connection with our controlling shareholder change in the first quarter of 2026.charges. Included in SG&A expenses in the firstsecond quarter of 2025 were $10.7$6.0 million of integration and realignment costs related to initiatives to integrate MRP and align our processesprocesses, and $0.3$0.2 million of executive transition chargescharges, and $0.3$0.1 million of transaction-related costs arising from the sale of our EMEA staffing operations. Excluding integration and realignment, transaction, executive transition charges, and depreciation and amortization, SG&A expenses decreased 9.5%4.0% from the prior year.
The gain on sale of EMEA staffing operations relates to the January 2024 sale. In the second quarter of 2025, we recognized a gain of $4.0 million upon the settlement of working capital and other adjustments.
Income tax expense was $3.0 million for the second quarter of 2026 compared to income tax expense of $0.9 million for the second quarter of 2025, driven by changes in pretax income and the benefit of work opportunity tax credits in the second quarter of 2025.
Revenue from services June year-to-date 2026 decreased 8.3% year-over-year with decreases in the ETM, SET, and Education segments. Compared to the June year-to-date 2025, the decrease is primarily due to declines in revenue from staffing services and outcome-based services of 11.2% and 5.0%, respectively, partially offset by growth in revenue from talent solutions of 4.7%.
Gross profit decreased 11.6%, largely driven by lower revenue volume. The gross profit rate decreased 80 bps to 19.6%, primarily due to higher employee-related costs in the beginning part of the year.
Total SG&A expenses decreased 8.7%, primarily due to expense management actions to reduce volume-related costs and reflects the benefits of the ongoing structural actions including integration and realignment efforts. SG&A expenses in the first six months of 2026 include $7.6 million of integration and realignment costs related to continuation of ongoing initiatives, $1.8 million of executive transition charges and $0.8 million of transaction costs primarily related to costs incurred in connection with our controlling shareholder change in the first quarter of 2026. Included in SG&A expenses in the first six months of 2025 were $16.7 million of integration costs related to initiatives to integrate MRP and align our processes, $0.5 million of executive transition charges and $0.4 million of transaction costs related to the sale of our EMEA staffing operations.
The gain on sale of EMEA staffing operations relates to the January 2024 sale. In the first six months of 2025, we recognized a gain of $4.0 million upon the settlement of working capital and other adjustments.
Income tax benefitexpense was $0.8$2.2 million for the first quartersix months of 2026 compared to income tax expense of $1.8$2.7 million for the first quartersix months of 2025, with the change primarily driven by changes in pretax income and the benefit of work opportunity tax credits in the first quartersix months of 2025.
The decrease in Education revenue from services of 4.8%4.4% was driven primarily by the impact of delayed contract decisions, weather-related school closures and a reduction in demand in key markets due to declines in student enrollment.
The decrease in ETM revenue from services of 9.6% was primarily driven by a decrease of 13.5% in staffing services resulting from lower hours volume primarily at certain large customers and a decrease of 14.8% from outcome-based services primarily due to the relationship exit of a large contact-center customer that ended as of the third quarter of 2025. Permanent placement fees decreased 32.7%, reflecting lower market demand. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of 4.7% in talent solutions driven by new customer wins and volume increases.
The decrease in SET revenue from services of 8.9% was primarily driven by declines in hours volume in our staffing specialties, largely from changes in demand related to U.S. federal government contractors and IT services, partially offset by an increase in permanent placement fees.
The decrease in Education revenue from services of 4.6% was driven primarily by the impact of prior year delayed contract decisions, weather-related school closures and a reduction in demand in key markets due to declines in student enrollment.
Gross profit for ETM decreased on lower revenue volume. The gross profit rate decreased by 1.7% primarily due to higher employee-related costs and lower permanent placement fees, partially offset by favorable changes in business mix.
The SET gross profit decreased on lower revenue volume. The gross profit rate decreased by 0.6% primarily due to higher employee-related costs, partially offset by higher permanent placement fees.
Gross profit for the Education segment decreased on lower revenue volume. The gross profit rate decreased by 1.7%, primarily due to higher employee-related costs as well as reductions due to changes in business mix and lower permanent placement fees.
Gross profit for ETM decreased on lower revenue volume. The gross profit rate increased by 50 bps primarily due to lower employee-related costs, partially offset by lower permanent placement fees.
The SET gross profit decreased on lower revenue volume. The gross profit rate decreased by 40 bps primarily due to changes in business mix, partially offset by lower employee-related costs and higher permanent placement fees.
Gross profit for the Education segment decreased on lower revenue volume. The gross profit rate decreased by 50 bps, primarily due to higher employee-related costs and lower permanent placement fees.
Gross profit for the ETM segment decreased on lower revenue volume. The gross profit rate decreased by 50 bps primarily due to higher employee-related costs.
The SET gross profit decreased on lower revenue volume. The gross profit rate decreased by 50 bps primarily due to changes in business mix and higher employee-related costs, partially offset by higher permanent placement fees.
Gross profit for the Education segment decreased on lower revenue volume. The gross profit rate decreased by 120 bps primarily due to higher employee-related costs and lower permanent placement fees.
Operating Results By Segment (continued)
The 14.0% decrease in ETM SG&A expenses excluding depreciation and amortization was primarily due to lower salary-related costs, lower performance-based incentive compensation, and lower shared service costs as a result of operating efficiencies and expense management actions in response to lower revenue volume compared to the prior year.
The 16.6%4.4% decrease in SETETM SG&A expenses excluding depreciation and amortization was primarily due to lower salary-related costs and performance-based incentive compensation as a result of operating efficiencies and expense management actions in response to lower revenue volume compared to the prior year.
The 0.7%7.8% decrease in EducationSET SG&A expenses excluding depreciation and amortization was primarily relateddue to lower performance-basedsalary-related incentivecosts compensation.as a result of operating efficiencies and expense management actions in response to lower revenue volume compared to the prior year.
The 0.8% decrease in Education SG&A expenses excluding depreciation and amortization primarily related to lower performance-based incentive compensation.
The 3.1%11.3% increasedecrease in Corporate expenses was primarily driven by investment in the Growth Office and other corporate initiatives and increases in our nonqualified compensation plan expense, partially offset by lower integration, realignment, and restructuring charges and performance-based incentive compensation in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 as compared to the prior year.
The 9.4% decrease in ETM SG&A expenses excluding depreciation and amortization was primarily due to lower salary-related costs and lower shared service costs as a result of operating efficiencies and expense management actions in response to lower revenue volume compared to the prior year.
The 12.4% decrease in SET SG&A expenses excluding depreciation and amortization was primarily due to lower salary-related costs and performance-based incentive compensation as a result of operating efficiencies and expense management actions in response to lower revenue volume compared to the prior year.
The 0.8% decrease in Education SG&A expenses excluding depreciation and amortization primarily related to lower performance-based incentive compensation.
The 3.4% decrease in Corporate expenses was primarily driven by lower integration, realignment, and restructuring charges, partially offset by investment in the Growth Office and other corporate initiatives in the first six months of 2026 as compared to the prior year.
Operating Results By Segment (continued)
ETM reportedbusiness aunit lossprofit of $1.3 millionincreased compared to profit of $6.3 million in the prior year.year due to lower SG&A expenses. SET and Education reportedbusiness unit profit of $12.0 million and $12.3 million, respectively, which decreased compared to the prior year. Declines in business unit profit (loss) areyear primarily due to lower revenue and gross profit, partially offset by lower SG&A expenses.
ETM, SET, and Education business unit profit decreased compared to the prior year primarily due to lower revenue and gross profit, partially offset by lower SG&A expenses.
Historically, we have financed our operations through cash generated by operating activities and access to credit markets. Our working capital requirements are primarily generated from temporary employee payroll, which is generally paid weekly, and customer accounts receivable, which is generally outstanding for longer periods. Since receipts from customers lag payroll to temporary employees, working capital requirements increase substantially in periods of growth. Conversely, when economic activity slows, working capital requirements may substantially decrease. This may result in an increase in our operating cash flows; however, any such increase would not be sustainable in the event that an economic downturn continued for an extended period. We also experience material seasonal fluctuations in working capital in our Education segment due to schools being mostly out of session during the summer.
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash totaled $29.5$28.0 million at the end of the firstsecond quarter of 2026 and $37.7 million at year-end 2025. As further described below, we generated $23.8 million of cash from operating activities, generated $0.2 million of cash from investing activities and used $25.4$31.2 million of cash for operating activities, used $1.2 million of cash for investing activities and generated $24.2 million of cash from financing activities.
In the first threesix months of 2026, we usedgenerated $25.4$23.8 million of net cash forfrom operating activities, as compared to generating $23.9$119.3 million in the first threesix months of 2025,2025. The decrease was primarily due to increasedhigher working capital requirements as compared to the same period of the prior year.
Trade accounts receivable totaled $1.2 billion at the end of the firstsecond quarter of 2026. Global DSO was 64 days for the first quarter of 2026 and 61 days at both second quarter-end 2026 and year-end 2025.
Our working capital position (total current assets less total current liabilities) was $480.2$429.9 million at the end of the firstsecond quarter of 2026, ana increasedecrease of $33.7$16.6 million from year-end 2025. The current ratio (total current assets divided by total current liabilities) was 1.61.5 at the end of the firstsecond quarter of 2026 and 1.5 at year-end 2025.
In the first threesix months of 2026, we usedgenerated $1.2$0.2 million of cash forfrom investing activities, as compared to generating $3.2$24.7 million in the first threesix months of 2025. Cash usedgenerated inby investing activities in the first threesix months of 2026 is primarily driven by $1.1$2.7 million of proceeds from company-owned life insurance, partially offset by $2.6 million of capital expenditures. Included in the cash generated forby investing activities in the first threesix months of 2025 is $21.8 million of proceeds from the sale of our EMEA staffing operations, $6.4 million of cash from the sale of the PersolKelly investment,investment and $1.6 million of proceeds from company-owned life insurance, partially offset by $2.5$4.5 million of cash used for capital expenditures.
We generatedused $24.2$31.2 million of cash fromfor financing activities in the first threesix months of 2026, as compared to using $39.5$172.7 million in the first threesix months of 2025. The change in cash generatedused from financing activities was primarily driven by lower net proceedsrepayments of $28.6$23.8 million on our credit facilities in 2026 compared to net repayments of $34.8$165.1 million on our credit facilities in 2025. Dividends paid per common share were $0.075 in each of the first two quarters of 2026 and 2025.
Debt-to-total capital (total debt reported in the consolidated balance sheet divided by total debt plus stockholders’ equity) is a common ratio to measure the relative capital structure and leverage of the Company. Our ratio of debt-to-total capital was 11.9%7.4% at the end of the firstsecond quarter of 2026 and 9.4% at year-end 2025.
As of firstsecond quarter-end 2026, we had $150.0 million of available capacity on our $150.0 million revolving credit facility and $76.9$129.3 million of available capacity on our $250.0 million securitization facility. The revolving credit facility carried no long-term borrowings on the floating or term benchmark lines of credit. The securitization facility carried $130.5$78.1 million of long-term borrowings and $42.6 million of standby letters of credit related to workers’ compensation. The credit facilities also include anprovisions accordionthat featurewould toallow increasefor expansion of our combined borrowing capacity by $250.0 million.
Together, the revolving credit and securitization facilities provide us with committed funding capacity that may be used for general corporate purposes subject to financial covenants and restrictions. We believe our cash flow from operations, the availability of liquidity under our credit facilities, including the accordionexpansion featureprovisions which allows us to increase our borrowing capacity and our ability to access capital from financial markets will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash requirements, while maintaining sufficient liquidity for normal operating purposes. As of firstsecond quarter-end 2026, we met the debt covenants related to our revolving credit facility and securitization facility.
As of firstsecond quarter-end of 2026, we had additional unsecured, uncommitted short-term local credit facilities totaling $3.1 million, under which we had no borrowings. Details of our debt facilities are contained in the Debt footnote in the notes to our consolidated financial statements.
Actual events and results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements due to a number of factors. The principal risk factors that could cause our actual performance and future events and actions to differ materially from such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, (i) changing market and economic conditions, (ii) disruption in the labor market and weakened demand for human capital resulting from technological advances, competitive pressures and pricing, loss of large corporate customers and government contractor requirements, (iii) the impact of laws and regulations (including federal, state and international tax laws), (iv) unexpected changes in claim trends on workers’ compensation, unemployment, disability and medical benefit plans, (v) litigation and other legal liabilities (including tax liabilities) in excess of our estimates, (vi) our ability to achieve our business's anticipated growth strategies, (vii) our future business development, results of operations and financial condition, (viii) damage to our brands, (ix) dependence on third parties for the execution of critical functions, (x) conducting business in foreign countries, including foreign currency fluctuations, (xi) availability of temporary workers with appropriate skills required by customers, (xii) cyberattacks or other breaches of network or information technology security, and (xiii) other risks, uncertainties and factors discussed in this report and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including those discussed under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of the Company’sour Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2025. Actual results may differ materially from any forward-looking statements contained herein, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law.
KELYA insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 1 filing (1 insider, 1 trade date, 29,999 shares, about $293.4K). Net open-market shares: -29,999 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$293.4K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-15 | Layden Christopher D. |
Shares withheld for tax | 15,998 | $16.45 | $263.2K |
| 2026-07-15 | Zuhlke Nicholas |
Shares withheld for tax | 1,025 | $14.33 | $14.7K |
| 2026-05-14 | Williams Vanessa Peterson |
Open-market sale | 29,999 | $9.78 | $293.4K |
| 2026-05-07 | Hunt James K |
Grant/award | 15,463 | $9.70 | $150.0K |
| 2026-05-07 | Mccrory Ryan B. |
Grant/award | 15,463 | $9.70 | $150.0K |
| 2026-04-15 | Leege Joel |
Grant/award | 13,426 | $9.32 | $125.1K |
| 2026-04-15 | Leege Joel |
Grant/award | 21,459 | $9.32 | $200.0K |
Well-known investors holding KELYA (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 1,029,514 | $12.6M | 0.0% | Reduced 1% |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 431,850 | $5.3M | 0.0% | Reduced 21% |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 120,108 | $1.5M | 0.0% | Added 6% |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 91,798 | $1.1M | 0.0% | New position |
| D. E. Shaw & Co. | 2026-06-30 | 82,947 | $1.0M | 0.0% | Reduced 32% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 20,909 | $256.8K | 0.0% | Reduced 65% |