KROS 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Keros Therapeutics, Inc. · Nasdaq · Pharmaceutical Preparations · CIK 1664710 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Our corporate restructuring announced in May 2025 may not result in anticipated savings, could result in total costs and expenses that are greater than expected and could disrupt our business.”
New heading “Our capital allocation strategy may not be effective at enhancing stockholder value, or providing other benefits we expect.”
New heading “We are a “smaller reporting company” and, as a result of the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to smaller reporting companies, our common stock may be less attractive to investors.”
Removed heading “Our executive officers, directors, and stockholders and their affiliates who beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock have the ability to exercise significant influence over our company, which will limit your ability to influence corporate matters and could delay or prevent a change in corporate control.”
Largest changes
see in full comparisonTheIfcostsweto(orrespondatothird party with whom we work) experience a security incidentand/or are perceived tomitigatehaveanyexperienced a securityvulnerabilitiesincident,thatwe maybeexperienceidentifiedadverse consequences. Additionally, our sensitive information could besignificant,leaked, disclosed, or revealed as a result of or in connection with oureffortsemployee’s, personnel’s, or vendor’s use of generative artificial intelligence, or AI, technologies, resulting in adverse consequences. In each case, these consequences may include: government enforcement actions (for example, investigations, fines, penalties, audits, and inspections); additional reporting requirements and/or oversight; restrictions on processing sensitive information (including personal data); litigation (including class action claims); indemnification obligations; negative publicity; reputational harm; monetary fund diversions; diversion of management attention; interruptions in our operations (including availability of data); financial loss; and other similar harms. Security incidents and attendant consequences may prevent or cause individuals toaddressstoptheseconductingproblemsbusinessmaywithnotusbeorsuccessful,negatively impact our ability to grow andtheseoperateproblemsour business. For example, the loss of preclinical or clinical data could result inunexpecteddelaysinterruptions,indelays,ourcessationregulatoryofapprovalservice, negative publicity,efforts andothersignificantlyharmincrease our costs toourrecoverbusinessorandreproduceourthecompetitive position.data. Any security incident affecting us, our current and future CROs, collaborators, contractors, consultants or other partners or our industry, whether real or perceived, could harm our reputation, erode confidence in the effectiveness of our security measures and lead to regulatory scrutiny. Likewise, we use third parties for the manufacture of our product candidates and to conduct clinical trials, and similar events relating to their computer systems could also have a material adverse effect on our business. To the extent that any disruption or security incident were to result in a loss of, or damage to, our data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could face governmental reporting obligations, fines, incur liability and the further development and commercialization of our product candidates could be delayed.
“Additionally, the U.S. Department of Justice issued a rule entitled the Preventing Access to U.S. Sensitive Personal Data and Government-Related Data by Countries of Concern or Covered Persons, which places additional restriction on certain data transactions involving countries of concern (e.g., China, Russia, Iran) and covered persons (i.e., individuals and entities who are designated as such by the U.S. …”see in full comparison
“If we (or a third party with whom we work) experience a security incident or are perceived to have experienced a security incident, we may experience adverse consequences. Additionally, our sensitive information could be leaked, disclosed, or revealed as a result of or in connection with our employee’s, personnel’s, or vendor’s use of generative AI technologies, resulting in adverse consequences. …”see in full comparison
“Our employees and personnel use generative AI technologies to perform their work, and the disclosure and use of personal information in AI technologies is subject to various privacy laws and other privacy obligations. Governments have passed and are likely to pass additional laws regulating AI. Our use of this technology could result in additional compliance costs, regulatory investigations and actions and lawsuits. If we are unable to use AI, it could make our business less efficient and result in competitive disadvantages.”see in full comparison
“On May 29, 2025, we announced the implementation of a corporate restructuring, including a reduction in force of approximately 45% of our then-current employee base across all functions, or the 2025 Restructuring. We substantially completed the 2025 Restructuring at the end of July 2025. As a result of the 2025 Restructuring, we estimated that we will realize average annualized cost savings of approximately $17 million. However, these estimates are subject to several assumptions, and actual results may differ. …”see in full comparison
“In addition, on December 11, 2025, the European Commission, the Parliament and the European Council reached a political agreement on a comprehensive overhaul of EU pharmaceutical legislation, or the Pharma Package. The reform has been under negotiation since the European Commission submitted its proposal in April 2023. This package - comprised of a new directive and regulation to replace existing legislation – aims to modernize the EU framework. The political agreement is currently subject to formal approval by the European Parliament and Council. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (110)
•All of our product candidates are in preclinical or clinical development stages. Clinical trials are difficult to design and implement, and they involve a lengthy and expensive process with uncertain outcomes. We may experience delays in completing, or ultimately be unable to complete, the development and commercialization of ciboterceptrinvatercept (KER-012KER-065), KER-065, elritercept (KER-050) or any future product candidates.
We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company with a limited operating history. Since our inception in 2015, we have invested most of our resources in developing our product candidates, building our intellectual property portfolio, developing our supply chain, conducting business planning, raising capital and providing general and administrative support for these operations. Consequently, we have no meaningful operations upon which to evaluate our business and predictions about our future success or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a longer operating history or a history of successfully developing and commercializing drug products. Investment in biopharmaceutical product development is highly speculative because it entails substantial upfront capital expenditures and significant risk that any potential product candidate will fail to demonstrate adequate effect or an acceptable safety profile, gain regulatory approval and become commercially viable. We have not yet demonstrated the ability to progress any product candidate through late-stage clinical trials, we have no products approved for commercial sale and we have not generated any revenue from product sales to date. While we were profitable in the year ended December 31, 2025, this was driven by the one-time upfront payment from our license agreement with Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., or Takeda. We continue to incur significant research and development and other expenses related to our ongoing operations. As a result, we are not profitable and have incurred losses in eachall periodfiscal sinceyears ourprior inception.to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. For the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, we reported a net income of $87.0 million and a net loss of $187.4 million and $153.0 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $568.8$481.8 million. We expect to continue to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future, and we expect these losses to increase as we continue our research and development of, and seek regulatory approvals for, our lead product candidate, cibotercept, our second product candidate, KER-065,rinvatercept, our most advanced product candidate, elritercept, and any future product candidates we may develop.
▪progress and complete our ongoing Phase 2 clinical trial of cibotercept in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, or PAH;
▪progress and complete our ongoing Phase 1 clinical trial of KER-065 in healthy volunteers;
▪commence a Phase 32 clinical trial of elriterceptrinvatercept in patients with lower-riskDuchenne myelodysplasticmuscular syndrome,dystrophy, or MDSDMD;
▪commence a Phase 2 clinical trial of rinvatercept in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or ALS;
To become and remain profitable, we, our collaborators and any potential future collaborators must develop and eventually commercialize products with significant market potential. This will require us to be successful in a range of challenging activities, including completing preclinical studies and clinical trials, obtaining marketing approval for product candidates, manufacturing, marketing and selling products for which we may obtain marketing approval and satisfying any post-marketing requirements. We, our collaborators and any potential future collaborators may never succeed in any or all of these activities and, even if we do, we may never generate revenue that is significant or large enough to achieve profitability. Revenue we generate from our collaborations with Takeda,Takeda and Hansoh (Shanghai) Healthech Co., Ltd., or Hansoh, and any future collaboration arrangements may not be sufficient to sustain our operations. If we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Our failure to become and remain profitable would decrease the value of our company and could impair our ability to raise capital, maintain our research and development efforts, expand our business or continue our operations. A decline in the value of our company also could cause you to lose all or part of your investment.
To date, we have funded our operations primarily through private placements of our equity securities, upfront and expense reimbursement payments received from our collaborators, from our initial public offering, or IPO, in April 2020, from our public offerings of common stock in November 2020 and January 2024, and from our “at the market offering,” in connection with our Sales Agreement with Leerink Partners LLC, or Leerink, as agent, pursuant to which we may offer and sell, from time to time, shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $350.0 million through Leerink, or the ATM Offering. We expect our expenses to increase in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we progress and completecommence our two Phase 2 clinical trialtrials of ciboterceptrinvatercept, one in patients with PAHDMD and our Phase 1 clinical trial of KER-065one in healthypatients volunteers,with ALS, and continue to research, develop and initiate clinical trials of any other future product candidates. In addition, if we obtain regulatory approval for any of our product candidates, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to product manufacturing, marketing, sales and distribution. Furthermore, we expect to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funding in connection with our continuing operations. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our product development programs or any future commercialization efforts.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had $559.9$287.4 million in cash and cash equivalents. Based on our current operating assumptions, we expect that our existing cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2024, together with the $200.0 million upfront payment pursuant to the license agreement with Takeda, or the Takeda Agreement, which we received in February 2025,2025 will enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements into 2029.the first half of 2028. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could use our capital resources sooner than we currently expect. Our future capital requirements for cibotercept, KER-065,rinvatercept, elritercept or our other preclinical programs will depend on many factors, including:
▪the timing and amount of milestone and royalty payments we are required to make or are eligible to receive under our license agreements with each of The General Hospital CorporationCorporation, Takeda and Hansoh (Shanghai) Healthtech Co., Ltd., or Hansoh;
▪the cost of manufacturing cibotercept, KER-065, elriterceptrinvatercept and future product candidates for clinical trials in preparation for marketing approval applications and in preparation for commercialization;
We do not have any committed external source of funds or other support for our development efforts and we cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Further, in the event that the license agreement we entered into with Takeda, or the Takeda AgreementAgreement, is terminated, we may not receive any additional fees or milestone payments under that agreement. Absent the funding support obtained under the Takeda Agreement, our further development of elritercept would require significant additional capital from us, or the establishment of alternative collaborations with third parties, which may not be possible. Until we can generate sufficient product or royalty revenue to finance our cash requirements, which we may never do, we expect to finance our future cash needs through a combination of public or private equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, strategic alliances, licensing arrangements and other marketing or distribution arrangements.
We cannot guarantee that future financing will be available in sufficient amounts or on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. Moreover, the terms of any financing may adversely affect the holdings or the rights of holders of our common stock and the issuance of additional securities, whether equity or debt, by us, or the possibility of such issuance, may cause the market price of our common stock to decline. The sale of additional common stock or securities convertible or exchangeable into common stock would dilute all of our existing stockholders and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights as a holder of our common stock. The incurrence of indebtedness could result in increased fixed payment obligations and we may be required to agree to certain restrictive covenants, such as limitations on our ability to incur additional debt or declare dividends, limitations on our ability to acquire, sell or license intellectual property rights and other operating restrictions that could adversely impact our ability to conduct our business. If we raise additional capital through marketing and distribution arrangements or other collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish certain valuable rights to our product candidates, technologies, future revenue streams or research programs or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. We also could be required to seek collaborators for cibotercept, KER-065, elriterceptrinvatercept or any future product candidate at an earlier stage than otherwise would be desirable or relinquish our rights to product candidates or technologies that we otherwise would seek to develop or commercialize ourselves. Further, any additional fundraising efforts may divert our management from its day-to-day activities, which may adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize our product candidates.
Before obtaining marketing approval from regulatory authorities for the sale of our product candidates, we must conduct extensive clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the product candidates in humans. We are early in our product candidate development efforts, as cibotercept, KER-065rinvatercept and elritercept are still in clinical trials. If anyeither of elritercept, ciboterceptrinvatercept or KER-065elritercept encounters safety or efficacy problems, development delays or regulatory issues or other problems, our development plans and business would be significantly harmed. For example, in January 2025, we announced the early termination of our Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating cibotercept in patients with PAH, which we refer to as the TROPOS trial, based on an ongoing safety review due to the unanticipated observation of pericardial effusion adverse events in the trial. Following completion of the TROPOS trial, we plan to evaluate the appropriate development strategy for cibotercept, including in PAH and other potential indications.
Our ability to generate product revenues, which we do not expect will occur for several years, if ever, will depend heavily on the successful development and eventual commercialization of cibotercept, KER-065,rinvatercept, elritercept and any future product candidates we develop, which may never occur. Cibotercept, KER-065,Rinvatercept, elritercept and any future product candidates we develop will require additional preclinical and clinical development, management of clinical, preclinical and manufacturing activities, marketing approval in the United States and other jurisdictions for specific indications for use, demonstrating effectiveness to pricing and reimbursement authorities, obtaining sufficient manufacturing supply for both clinical development and commercial production, building of a commercial organization and substantial investment and significant marketing efforts before we generate any revenues from product sales. The success of our current and future product candidates will depend on several factors, including the following:
If we are not successful with respect to one or more of these factors in a timely manner or at all, we could experience significant delays or an inability to successfully commercialize cibotercept, KER-065,rinvatercept, elritercept or any future product candidates we develop, which would materially harm our business. If we do not receive marketing approvals for our current and future product candidates, we may not be able to continue our operations.
All of our product candidates are in preclinical or clinical development stages. Clinical trials are difficult to design and implement, and they involve a lengthy and expensive process with uncertain outcomes. We may experience delays in completing, or ultimately be unable to complete, the development and commercialization of cibotercept, KER-065,rinvatercept, elritercept or any future product candidates.
Clinical testing is expensive and can take many years to complete, and its outcome is inherently uncertain. Failure can occur at any time during the clinical trial process and our future clinical trial results may not be successful. We cannot guarantee that any of our ongoing and planned clinical trials will be conducted as planned or completed on schedule, if at all. Moreover, even if these trials are initiated or conducted on a timely basis, issues may arise that could result in the suspension or termination of such clinical trials. For example, in January 2025, we announced the early termination of our TROPOSPhase 2 clinical trial evaluating cibotercept in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, or PAH, which we refer to as the TROPOS trial, based on an ongoing safety review due to the unanticipated observation of pericardial effusion adverse events in the trial.
To date, we have not completed any pivotal clinical trials required for the approval of any of our product candidates. Although we have completed our Phase 1 clinical trial of elriterceptrinvatercept and our Phase 1 clinical trial of cibotercept,elritercept, both in healthy volunteers, we may experience delays in our ongoing clinical trials or preclinical studies and we do not know whether planned clinical trials will begin on time, need to be redesigned, enroll patients on time, have sufficient drug supply for our product candidates on a timely basis or be completed on schedule, if at all. A failure of one or more clinical trials can occur at any stage of testing, and our ongoing and future clinical trials may not be successful. We also may experience numerous unforeseen events during our clinical trials that could delay or prevent our ability to receive marketing approval or commercialize cibotercept, KER-065,rinvatercept, elritercept or any future product candidates, including:
▪business interruptions resulting from geopolitical actions, including war, such as the current Russia-Ukraine war and the war in Israel,the Middle East, and terrorism or the perception that such hostilities may be imminent, another outbreak of a contagious disease, or natural disasters including earthquakes, typhoons, floods and fires.
To obtain the requisite regulatory approvals to market and sell any of our product candidates, including cibotercept, KER-065,rinvatercept, elritercept and any other future product candidates, we must demonstrate through extensive preclinical studies and clinical trials that our investigational drug products are safe and effective for use in each targeted indication, and in the case of our product candidates regulated as biological products, such as cibotercept, KER-065rinvatercept and elritercept, that the product candidate is safe, pure and potent for use in its targeted indication. Clinical testing is expensive and can take many years to complete, and its outcome is inherently uncertain. Failure can occur at any time during the clinical development process. Most product candidates that begin clinical trials are never approved by regulatory authorities for commercialization. We may be unable to establish clinical endpoints that applicable regulatory authorities would consider clinically meaningful, and a clinical trial can fail at any stage of testing. Further, the process of obtaining regulatory approval is expensive, often takes many years following the commencement of clinical trials and can vary substantially based upon the type, complexity and novelty of the product candidates involved, as well as the target indications, patient population and regulatory agency. Prior to obtaining approval to commercialize cibotercept, KER-065,rinvatercept, elritercept and any future product candidates in the United States or abroad, we, our collaborators or our potential future collaborators must demonstrate with substantial evidence from adequate and well-controlled clinical trials, and to the satisfaction of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, that such product candidates are safe and effective for their intended uses.
Clinical trials that we conduct may not demonstrate the efficacy and safety necessary to obtain regulatory approval to market our product candidates. In some instances, there can be significant variability in safety or efficacy results between different clinical trials of the same product candidate due to numerous factors, including changes in trial procedures set forth in protocols, differences in the size and type of the patient populations, changes in and adherence to the clinical trial protocols and the rate of dropout among clinical trial participants. If the results of our ongoing or future clinical trials are inconclusive with respect to the efficacy of our product candidates, if we do not meet the clinical endpoints with statistical and clinically meaningful significance, or if there are safety concerns associated with our product candidates, we may be delayed in obtaining marketing approval, if at all. Additionally, any safety concerns observed in any one of our clinical trials in our targeted indications could limit the prospects for regulatory approval of our product candidates in those and other indications. For example, in January 2025, we announced the early termination of our TROPOS trial evaluating cibotercept in patients with PAH, based on an ongoing safety review due to the unanticipated observation of pericardial effusion adverse events in the trial. Consequently, we determined to deprioritize cibotercept, and pause all material, internal development activities associated with this asset.
Even if the trials are successfully completed, clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses, and we cannot guarantee that the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities will interpret the results as we do, and more trials could be required before we submit our product candidates for approval. We cannot guarantee that the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities will view our product candidates as having efficacy even if positive results are observed in clinical trials. Moreover, results acceptable to support approval in one jurisdiction may be deemed inadequate by another regulatory authority to support regulatory approval in that other jurisdiction. To the extent that the results of the trials are not satisfactory to the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities for support of a marketing application, approval of cibotercept, KER-065,rinvatercept, elritercept and any future product candidates may be significantly delayed, or we may be required to expend significant additional resources, which may not be available to us, to conduct additional trials in support of potential approval of our product candidates. Even if regulatory approval is secured for a product candidate, the terms of such approval may limit the scope and use of the specific product candidate, which may also limit its commercial potential.
Open-label clinical trials are also subject to various limitations that may exaggerate any therapeutic effect as patients in open-label clinical trials are aware when they are receiving treatment. Open-label clinical trials may be subject to a “patient bias” where patients perceive their symptoms to have improved merely due to their awareness of receiving an experimental treatment. Moreover, patients selected for early-stage clinical trials often include the most severe sufferers and their symptoms may have been bound to improve notwithstanding the new treatment. In addition, open-label clinical trials may be subject to an “investigator bias” where those assessing and reviewing the physiological outcomes of the clinical trials are aware of which patients have received treatment and may interpret the information of the treated group more favorably given this knowledge. Given that two open-label Phase 2 clinical trials are ongoing for elritercept, one in patients with lower-risk MDS and one in patients with myelofibrosis, the results from these clinical trials may not be predictive of future clinical trial results with these or other product candidates for which we include an open-label clinical trial, when studied in a controlled environment with a placebo or active control.
Undesirable side effects that may be caused by our product candidates could cause us or regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials and could result in a more restrictive label or the delay or denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. ForWhile example, in December 2024, we announced that we voluntarily halted dosing in the 3.0 mg/kgrinvatercept and 4.5elritercept mg/kghave treatmentgenerally armsbeen well tolerated in our TROPOSpreclinical trialstudies evaluatingand ciboterceptclinical intrials patientsto withdate, PAHthe basedresults onfrom afuture preclinical studies and clinical trials, including our other product candidates, may identify additional safety reviewconcerns dueor toother theundesirable unanticipated observationproperties of pericardialour effusionproduct adverse events at those dose levels.candidates.
Subsequently, we announced in January 2025 that we voluntarily halted all dosing in the TROPOS trial, including the 1.5 mg/kg and placebo treatment arms, based on the ongoing safety review due to new observations of pericardial effusion adverse events. While KER-065 and elritercept have generally been well tolerated in our preclinical studies and clinical trials to date, the results from future preclinical studies and clinical trials, including of cibotercept and our other product candidates, may identify additional safety concerns or other undesirable properties of our product candidates.
The results of our ongoing Phase 2 clinical trials of elritercept, our ongoing Phase 1 clinical trial of KER-065rinvatercept and future clinical trials of these and other product candidates, including cibotercept,candidates may show that our product candidates cause undesirable or unacceptable side effects or even death. In such an event, our trials could be suspended or terminated and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities could order us to cease further development of or deny approval of our product candidates for any or all targeted indications. The drug-related side effects could affect patient recruitment or the ability of enrolled patients to complete the trial or result in potential product liability claims. Any of these occurrences may harm our business, financial condition and results of operations significantly.
Moreover, if our product candidates are associated with undesirable side effects in preclinical studies or clinical trials or have characteristics that are unexpected, we may elect to abandon their development or limit their development to more narrow uses or subpopulations in which the undesirable side effects or other characteristics are less prevalent, less severe or more acceptable from a risk-benefit perspective, which may limit the commercial expectations for the product candidate, if approved. For example, following completion of the TROPOS trial, we plan to evaluate the appropriate development strategy for cibotercept, including in PAH and other potential indications..
Identifying and qualifying patients to participate in clinical trials of our product candidates is critical to our success. The timely completion of our clinical trials in accordance with their protocols depends, among other things, on our ability to recruit a sufficient number of eligible patients to participate and remain in the trial until its conclusion. Patients may be unwilling to participate in our clinical trials because of negative publicity from adverse events related to novel therapeutic approaches, competitive clinical trials for similar patient populations, the existence of current treatments or for other reasons, including public health crises. For example, the unanticipated observation of pericardial effusion adverse events in our TROPOS trial evaluating cibotercept in patients with PAH may impact our ability to enroll patients in any future clinical trials of cibotercept. Any delays related to patient enrollment or difficulties related to patient retention could result in increased costs, delays in advancing our product candidates, delays in testing the effectiveness of our product candidates or termination of the clinical trials altogether. We may not be able to identify, recruit and enroll a sufficient number of patients, or those with the required or desired characteristics, to complete our clinical trials in a timely manner. Patient enrollment and trial completion is affected by many factors, including the:
From time to time, we may publish interim, topline or preliminary data from our clinical trials. Preliminary and interim data from our clinical trials may change as more participant data become available. For example, in JuneDecember 2021,2024, we announced preliminary efficacy results from CohortsParts 1 and 2 of our Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating elritercept for the treatment of anemia and thrombocytopenia in patients with lower-risk MDS, which only included a small subset of the patients expected to be enrolled in the trial. We also announced additional preliminary efficacy results from Parts 1 and 2 of that trial most recently in December 2024.MDS. Preliminary or interim data from our clinical trials are not necessarily predictive of final results. Preliminary and interim data are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as enrollment continues, more trial data become available and we issue our final clinical trial report. Interim, topline and preliminary data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the preliminary data we previously published. As a result, preliminary, topline and interim data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. Material adverse changes in the final data compared to the interim data could significantly harm our business prospects.
Before we can commence clinical trials for any product candidate, we must complete extensive preclinical studies that support any future Investigational New Drug, or IND, applications in the United States, or similar applications in other jurisdictions. All of our completed clinical trials have, to date, been conducted outside of the United States. However, we submitted and cleared an IND with the FDA for our Phase 2 clinical trial for elritercept in patients with MDS in October 2022, submitted and cleared an IND with the FDA for our Phase 2 clinical trial for cibotercept in patients with PAH in July 20232022 and submitted and cleared an IND with the FDA for our Phase 2 clinical trial for elritercept in patients with myelofibrosis in February 2025. Conducting preclinical testing is a lengthy, time-consuming and expensive process and delays associated with product candidates for which we are directly conducting preclinical testing and studies may cause us to incur additional operating expenses. While we are initially conducting a Phase 2 clinical trial for elriterceptrinvatercept in patients with myelofibrosis and a Phase 1 clinical trial for KER-065 in healthy volunteersDMD outside of the United States, we cannot be certain of the timely completion or outcome of our preclinical testing and studies for our other product candidates and cannot predict if the FDA will accept our proposed clinical programs or if the outcome of our preclinical testing and foreign clinical trials will ultimately support the further development of our other product candidates. As a result, we cannot be sure that we will be able to submit INDs or similar applications for our preclinical programs on the timelines we expect, if at all, and we cannot be sure that submission of INDs or similar applications will result in the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities allowing clinical trials to begin.
The policies of the FDA and of comparable foreign regulatory authorities may change and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of our product candidates. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad. As an example, the regulatory landscape related to clinical trials in the EU has evolved. The EU Clinical Trials Regulation, or CTR, which was adopted in April 2014 and repeals the EU Clinical Trials Directive, or CTD, became applicable on January 31, 2022. The CTR permits trial sponsors to make a single submission to both the competent authority and an ethics committee in each EU Member State, leading to a single decision for each EU Member State. The assessment procedure for the authorization of clinical trials has been harmonized as well, including a joint assessment of some elements of the application by all EU Member States in which the trial is to be conducted, and a separate assessment by each EU Member State with respect to specific requirements related to its own territory, including ethics rules. Each EU Member State’s decision is communicated to the sponsor through a centralized EU portal, the Clinical Trial Information System, or CTIS. In addition, the CTR establishes a general principle according to which information contained in CTIS shall be made publicly accessible unless confidentiality is justified on grounds of protecting personal data, or commercially confidential information, necessary to protect confidential communications between EU Member States in relation torequires the preparation of an assessment report, or necessary to ensure effective supervision of the conduct of a clinical trial by EU Member States. This confidentiality exception may be overruled if there is an overriding public interest in disclosure. In addition, the EMA has limited the amount of data and documents that will be made public. The publication of certain data and documents in relation to the conduct of a clinical trialtrial, which will take place in accordance with specific timelines. The timelines are established by the European Medicines Agency, or the EMA, and are determined based on the documents and the categorization of the clinical trial. The CTR provides a three-year transition period. The extent to which ongoing clinical trials will be governed by the CTR varies. The CTR foresawprovided a three-year transition period that ended on January 31, 2025. Since this date, all new or ongoing trials are subject to the provisions of the CTR. Our compliance with the CTR requirements and that of our third-party service providers, such as CROs, may impact our developments plans.
The UK regulatory framework in relation to clinical trials is governed by the Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004, as amended, which is derived from the CTD, as implemented into UK national law through secondary legislation. Following a public consultation that began in 2022, the United Kingdom government has enacted new legislation to overhaul the clinical trials regulatory framework. In April 2025, the UK adopted an amendment to the Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004 intended to support a more streamlined and flexible regulation of clinical trials, remove unnecessary administrative burdens on trial sponsors, and protect the interests of trial participants. It also intends to bring the UK regulatory framework for clinical trials into closer alignment with the CTR. The amendment will become applicable on April 28, 2026 following a one-year transition period. While these changes introduce efficiencies and align with some principles of the CTR, divergence between the United Kingdom and EU regulatory systems remains. Any significant divergence could affect the cost and complexity of conducting clinical trials in the United Kingdom and may impact the acceptability of United Kingdom-based trial data for seeking marketing authorizations in the EU, and vice versa.
In addition, on December 11, 2025, the European Commission, the Parliament and the European Council reached a political agreement on a comprehensive overhaul of EU pharmaceutical legislation, or the Pharma Package. The reform has been under negotiation since the European Commission submitted its proposal in April 2023. This package - comprised of a new directive and regulation to replace existing legislation – aims to modernize the EU framework. The political agreement is currently subject to formal approval by the European Parliament and Council. If approved in the form proposed, the Pharma Package will, among other changes, reduce the baseline market protection period by one year, with limited opportunities for extensions, capped at a maximum of 11 years; reshape the incentives regime for orphan medicinal products, by introducing “breakthrough” orphan medicinal products – those addressing diseases with no available medicinal treatment – which will benefit from 11 years of market exclusivity; and expand the Bolar exemption to permit generic and biosimilar manufacturers to conduct preparatory activities for regulatory submissions, including pricing and reimbursement, and participate in procurement tenders while patent protection remains in force. A decrease in market exclusivity opportunities for our product candidates in the EU, combined with the expanded Bolar exemption, could open them to generic or biosimilar competition earlier than under the current regime, potentially impacting reimbursement status and the commercial prospects of our product candidates.
In addition, on April 26, 2023, the European Commission adopted a proposal for a new Directive and Regulation to revise the existing pharmaceutical legislation and on April 10, 2024, the Parliament adopted its related position. The proposed revisions remain to be agreed and adopted by the European Council. Moreover, on December 1, 2024, a new European Commission took office. The proposal could, therefore, still be subject to revisions. If adopted in the form proposed, the European Commission proposals to revise the existing EU laws governing authorization of medicinal products may result in a number of changes to the regulatory framework governing medicinal products, including a decrease in data and market exclusivity for our product candidates in the EU.
If approved, our investigational products regulated as biologics, including cibotercept, KER-065rinvatercept and elritercept, may face competition from biosimilars approved through an abbreviated regulatory pathway.
We are developing ciboterceptrinvatercept for the treatment of PAHDMD and for the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, KER-065 for the treatment of neuromuscular diseases,ALS, and elritercept for the treatment of cytopenias, including anemia and thrombocytopenia, in patients with MDS and myelofibrosis, eachboth of which we anticipate will be regulated as a biological product. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, or collectively the ACA, includes a subtitle called the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009, or BPCIA, which created an abbreviated approval pathway for biological products that are biosimilar to or interchangeable with an FDA-licensed reference biological product. Under the BPCIA, an application for a biosimilar product may not be submitted to the FDA until four years following the date that the reference product was first licensed by the FDA. In addition, the approval of a biosimilar product may not be made effective by the FDA until 12 years from the date on which the reference product was first licensed. During this 12-year period of exclusivity, another company may still market a competing version of the reference product if the FDA approves a BLA for the competing product containing the sponsor’s own preclinical data and data from adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to demonstrate the safety, purity, and potency of the other company’s product. The law is complex and is still being interpreted and implemented by the FDA. As a result, its ultimate impact, implementation, and meaning are subject to uncertainty.
Because we have limited resources and access to capital to fund our operations, we must decide which product candidates to pursue and the amount of resources to allocate to each. For example, in August 2025, we announced the deprioritization of cibotercept, including our decision to discontinue all material, internal development activities related to this asset. This decision came after the termination of the development of cibotercept in PAH following the analysis of all available safety and efficacy data from the TROPOS Phase 2 clinical trial in patients with PAH. Additionally, in November 2023, we announced the deprioritization of our small molecule product candidate, KER-047, a potent and selective inhibitor of activin receptor-like kinase-2, a TGF-ß superfamily receptor, including our decision to pause all development activities associated with this asset. Our decisions concerning the allocation of research, collaboration, management and financial resources toward particular proprietary molecules in our library, product candidates or therapeutic areas may not lead to the development of viable commercial products and may divert resources away from better opportunities. Similarly, our decisions to delay, terminate or collaborate with third parties in respect of certain product development programs may also prove not to be optimal and could cause us to miss valuable opportunities. If we make incorrect determinations regarding the market potential of our product candidates or misread trends in the biopharmaceutical industry, in particular for cibotercept, KER-065rinvatercept and elritercept, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
As part of our business strategy, we may seek orphan drug designation for any product candidates we develop, which meets the related applicable criteria, and we may be unsuccessful. For example, in August 2025, we announced that the FDA granted orphan drug designation for rinvatercept for the treatment of DMD. Regulatory authorities in some jurisdictions, including the United States, may designate drugs for relatively small patient populations as orphan drugs. Under the Orphan Drug Act in the United States, the FDA may designate a drug as an orphan drug if it is a drug intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally defined as a patient population of fewer than 200,000 individuals annually in the United States, or a patient population greater than 200,000 in the United States where there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing the drug will be recovered from sales in the United States. In the United States, orphan drug designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as opportunities for grant funding towards certain clinical trial costs, tax advantages and user-fee waivers.
If we are successful in obtaining marketing approval from applicable regulatory authorities for cibotercept, KER-065,rinvatercept, elritercept or any other product candidate, our ability to generate revenues from any such products will depend on our success in:
We compete in the segments of the biotechnology, pharmaceutical and other related industries that develop and market therapies in our target indications. There are many other companies, including large biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, that have commercialized and/or are developing therapies for the same therapeutic areas that our product candidates target. For example, in March 2024, Merck & Co. Inc., or Merck, received FDA approval of its product, sotatercept (WINREVAIR), for the treatment of adults with PAH. In August 2024, Merck announced that the European Commission approved sotatercept for the treatment of adults with PAH. All of the other currently-approved therapies for PAH are vasodilators, which are medications that dilate blood vessels. Gossamer Bio, Inc. is developing seralutinib for the treatment of PAH.
Currently, patients with DMD are treated with corticosteroids to manage the inflammatory component of the disease. EMFLAZA (deflazacort) is an FDA-approved corticosteroid marketed by PTC Therapeutics, Inc. and Agamree (vamorolone) is an FDA-approved corticosteroid marketed by Catalyst Pharmaceuticals in the United States. In addition, there are four FDA-approved exon skipping drugs: EXONDYS 51 (eteplirsen), VYONDYS 53 (golodirsen), and AMONDYS 45 (casimersen), which are phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomers, or PMOs, approved for the treatment of patients with DMD who are amenable to exon 51, exon 53 and exon 45 skipping, respectively, and are marketed by Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., or Sarepta, and VILTEPSO (vitolarsen), a PMO approved for the treatment of patients with DMD who are amenable to exon 53 skipping, which is marketed by Nippon Shinyaku Co. Ltd. Additionally, in June 2023, Sarepta announced that the FDA accelerated approval of its product, ELEVIDYS, an adeno-associated virus based gene therapy for the treatment of ambulatory pediatric patients aged 4 through 5 years with DMD with a confirmed mutation in the DMD gene. In June 2024, the FDA granted ELEVIDYS full approval for the treatment of ambulatory individuals aged four years and older, and accelerated approval for the treatment of non-ambulatory individuals aged four years and older. In July 2025, Sarepta announced its decision to voluntarily and temporarily pause all shipments of ELEVIDYS for patients with DMD in the United States. Subsequently, in July 2025, Sarepta announced that the FDA notified Sarepta that it may lift its voluntary pause on shipments of ELEVIDYS for ambulatory patients with DMD, and Sarepta resumed shipping to such patients immediately.
In addition, several companies are developing gene therapies to treat DMD, including Pfizer Inc., Audentes Therapeutics,REGENXBIO Inc. and Solid Biosciences Inc. Gene editingRNA-targeted treatments that are in clinical and preclinical development are also being pursued by Vertexseveral Pharmaceuticals,companies, including Avidity Biosciences, Inc., Wave Life Sciences Ltd., Dyne Therapeutics, Inc. and Sarepta. Additionally,Edgewise SantheraTherapeutics, Pharmaceuticals, in collaboration with ReveraGen Biopharma, Inc,Inc. is developing sevasemten, a steroidmyosin therapyATPase inhibitor, for DMD,both DMD and ItalfarmacoBecker muscular dystrophy. Satellos Bioscience Inc. is developing aSAT-3277, histonean deacetylaseAAK1 (HDAC) inhibitorinhibitor, for the treatment of DMD.
There are three therapies approved by FDA to treat ALS and its symptoms: riluzole, an anti-glutamatergic agent; edaravone, a free-radical scavenger; and tofersen, an antisense oligonucleotide treatment of SOD1-ALS. One additional therapeutic, sodium phenylbutyrate and taurursodiol, was approved under an accelerated pathway by the FDA but subsequently withdrawn from the market following negative results from a confirmatory Phase 3 trial. To the best of our knowledge, there are no other companies developing product candidates to treat ALS by targeting skeletal muscle. However, several companies are developing product candidates to treat ALS through other mechanisms, including Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Novartis AG and Genervon Biopharmaceuticals LLC.
Kyntra Bio Inc. (formerly FibroGen Inc.) and Astellas Pharma Inc. are developing product candidates for the treatment of anemia, and Merck & Co. Inc., or Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Disc Medicine are developing product candidates targeting diseases associated with MDS and myelofibrosis, including chronic anemia. Additionally, in April 2020, Merck and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company received FDA approval of its product, Reblozyl, for the treatment of anemia failing an erythropoiesis stimulating agent and requiring two or more red blood cell units over eight weeks in adult patients with very low- to intermediate-risk MDS with ring sideroblasts or with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis. In June 2020, Merck further announced that the European Commission approved Reblozyl for the treatment of transfusion-dependent anemia in adult patients with MDS or beta thalassemia and in September 2020, Merck announced that Health Canada approved Reblozyl for the treatment of adult patients with red blood cell transfusion-dependent anemia associated with beta thalassemia. In August 2023, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company announced that the FDA approved Reblozyl for the treatment of anemia without previous erythropoiesis stimulating agent use (ESA-naïve) in adult patients with very low- to intermediate-risk MDS who may require regular red blood cell transfusions. In April 2024, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company further announced that the European Commission expanded approval of Reblozyl to include treatment of adult patients with and without ring sideroblasts with transfusion-dependent anemia due to lower-risk MDS. In June 2024, Geron Corporation announced that the FDA approved imetelstat (RYTELO) for the treatment of adult patients with low- to intermediate-1 risk MDS with transfusion-dependent anemia requiring four or more red blood cell units over eight weeks who have not responded to or have lost response to or are ineligible for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.
Since its enactment, there have been judicial, Congressional and executive branch challenges and amendments to certain aspects of the ACA. For example, on August 16, 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, or the IRA, was signed into law, which among other things, extends enhanced subsidies for individuals purchasing health insurance coverage in ACA marketplaces through plan year 2025. The IRA also eliminates the “donut hole” under the Medicare Part D program beginning in 2025 by significantly lowering the beneficiary maximum out-of-pocket cost and through a newly established manufacturer discount program. It is unclear how any additional healthcare reform measures of the second Trump administration will impact the ACA and our business.
Since its enactment, there have been judicial, Congressional and executive branch challenges and amendments to certain aspects of the ACA. For example, on July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, or the OBBBA, was signed into law, which narrowed access to ACA marketplace exchange enrollment and declined to extend the ACA enhanced advanced premium tax credits that expired at the end of 2025, which, among other provisions in the law, are anticipated to reduce the number of Americans with health insurance. The OBBBA also is expected to reduce Medicaid spending and enrollment by implementing work requirements for some beneficiaries, capping state-directed payments, reducing federal funding, and limiting provider taxes used to fund the program. Congress is considering proposed legislation intended to further reduce healthcare costs with alternatives to replace the expired ACA subsidies. Other legislative changes have also been proposed and adopted in the United States since the ACA was enacted. InFor example, in August 2011, the Budget Control Act of 2011, among other things, led to aggregate reductions of Medicare payments to providers of 2% per fiscal year. These reductions went into effect in April 2013 and, due to subsequent legislative amendments to the statute, including the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023, will remain in effect until 2032, unless additional action is taken by Congress. Additionally, on March 11, 2021, the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 was signed into law, which eliminated the statutory Medicaid drug rebate cap, previously set at 100% of a drug’s average manufacturer price, for single source and innovator multiple source drugs, effective January 1, 2024. These new laws or any other similar laws introduced in the future may result in additional reductions in Medicare and other health care funding, which could negatively affect our customers and accordingly, our financial operations.
The current administration is pursuing policies to reduce regulations and expenditures across government agencies including at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, the FDA, the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, and related agencies. These actions, presently directed by executive orders or memoranda from the Office of Management and Budget, may propose policy changes that create additional uncertainty for our business. For example, the current administration has announced agreements with several pharmaceutical companies that require the drug manufacturers to offer, through a direct-to-consumer platform, U.S. patients and Medicaid programs prescription drug Most-Favored Nation pricing equal to or lower than those paid in other developed nations, with additional mandates for direct-to-patient discounts and repatriation of foreign revenues. Other recent actions, for example, include (1) directing agencies to reduce agency workforce and cut programs; (2) directing HHS and other agencies to lower prescription drug costs through a variety of initiatives, including by improving upon the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program and establishing Most-Favored-Nation pricing for pharmaceutical products; (3) imposing tariffs on imported pharmaceutical products; and (4) as part of the Make America Healthy Again Commission’s Strategy Report released in September 2025, working across government agencies to increase enforcement on direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising. Additionally, the current administration recently called on Congress to enact "The Great Healthcare Plan," to codify and expand Most-Favored Nation pricing, lower government subsidies to private insurance companies, increase healthcare price transparency, expand pharmaceutical drugs available for over-the-counter purchase, and enact restrictions on pharmacy benefit manager payment methodologies, among other things. These actions and policies may significantly reduce U.S. drug prices, potentially impacting manufacturers’ global pricing strategies and profitability, while increasing their operational costs and compliance risks. In June 2024, Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the U.S. Supreme Court greatly reduced judicial deference to regulatory agencies, which could increase successful legal challenges to federal regulations affecting our operations. Congress may introduce and ultimately pass health care related legislation that could impact the drug approval process and make changes to the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program.
Moreover, payment methodologies may be subject to changes in healthcare legislation and regulatory initiatives. For example, CMS may develop new payment and delivery models, such as bundled payment models. In addition, recently there has been heightened governmental scrutiny over the manner in which manufacturers set prices for their marketed products, which has resulted in several U.S. presidential executive orders, Congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted federal legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to drug pricing, reduce the cost of prescription drugs under Medicare and review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs. For example, the IRA, among other things, (1) directs the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, to negotiate the price of certain high-expenditure single-source drugs that have been on the market for at least 7 years and biologics that have been on the market for at least 7 years covered under Medicare (the “Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program”) and (2) imposes rebates under Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D to penalize price increases that outpace inflation. The IRA permits HHS to implement many of these provisions through guidance, as opposed to regulation, for the initial years. HHS has and will continue to issue and update guidance as these programs are implemented. These provisions take effect progressively starting in fiscal year 2023. On August 15, 2024, HHS announced the agreed-upon reimbursement price of the first ten drugs that were subject to price negotiations, although the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program is currently subject to legal challenges. On January 17, 2025, HHS selected fifteen additional products covered under Part D for price negotiation in 2025. Each year thereafter more Part B and Part D products will become subject to the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program. Further, on December 7, 2023, an initiative to control the price of prescription drugs through the use of march-in rights under the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, or the Bayh-Dole Act was announced. On December 8, 2023, the National Institute of Standards and Technology published for comment a Draft Interagency Guidance Framework for Considering the Exercise of March-In Rights which for the first time includes the price of a product as one factor an agency can use when deciding to exercise march-in rights. While march-in rights have not previously been exercised, it is uncertain if that will continue under the new framework. We expect that additional U.S. federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that the U.S. federal government will pay for healthcare products and services, which could result in reduced demand for our product candidates or additional pricing pressures.
Moreover, in order to obtain reimbursement for our products in some European countries, including some EU Member States, we may be required to compile additional data comparing the cost-effectiveness of our products to other available therapies. The Health Technology Assessment, or HTA, of medicinal products is becoming an increasingly common part of the pricing and reimbursement procedures in some EU Member States, including those representing the larger markets. The HTA process is the procedure to assess therapeutic, economic and societal impact of a given medicinal product in the national healthcare systems of the individual country. The outcome of an HTA will often influence the pricing and reimbursement status granted to these medicinal products by the competent authorities of individual EU Member States. The extent to which pricing and reimbursement decisions are influenced by the HTA of the specific medicinal product currently varies between EU Member States. InOn DecemberJanuary 2021,12, 2025 Regulation No 2021/2282 on HTA, amending Directive 2011/24/EU, was adopted in the EU. This Regulation, whichHTA entered into force in January 2022 and began to apply on January 12, 2025application through a phased implementation,implementation. The Regulation is intended to boost cooperation among EU Member States in assessing health technologies, including new medicinal products, and providingestablishes thea basisframework for cooperation at EU level forEU-level joint clinical assessments in these areas.assessments. The regulation will permitpermits EU Member States to use common HTA tools, methodologies, and procedures across the EU to identify promising technologies early, and continuing voluntary cooperation in other areas. Individual EU Member States will continue to be responsible for assessing non-clinical (e.g., economic, social, ethical) aspects of health technologies, and making decisions on pricing and reimbursement. If we are unable to maintain favorable pricing and reimbursement status in EU Member States for product candidates that we may successfully develop and for which we may obtain regulatory approval, any anticipated revenue from and growth prospects for those products in the EU could be negatively affected.
Disruptions at the FDA, other agencies or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may also slow the time necessary for new drugs to be reviewed and/or approved, which would adversely affect our business. For example, in 2023, the U.S. government was on the verge of a shutdown and has previously shut down several times, including in October 2025, and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA and the SEC, have had to furlough critical employees and stop critical activities during such previous shutdowns. If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, or if global health concerns prevent the FDA or other regulatory authorities from conducting their regular inspections, reviews, or other regulatory activities, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, future government shutdowns or delays could impact our ability to access the public markets and obtain necessary capital in order to properly capitalize and continue our operations.
There is significant uncertainty related to third-party payor coverage and reimbursement of newly approved products. In the United States, for example, principal decisions about reimbursement for new products are typically made by the CMS. The CMS decidesdecide whether and to what extent a new product will be covered and reimbursed under Medicare, and private third-party payors often follow CMS’s decisions regarding coverage and reimbursement to a substantial degree. However, one third-party payor’s determination to provide coverage for a product candidate does not assure that other payors will also provide coverage for the product candidate. As a result, the coverage determination process is often time-consuming and costly. This process will require us to provide scientific and clinical support for the use of our products, if approved, to each third-party payor separately, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be applied consistently or obtained in the first instance.
Further, HHS imposes rebates on many Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D products to penalize price increases that outpace inflation on an annual basis. HHS has also been empowered to negotiate the price of certain single-source drugs that have been on the market for at least seven years covered under Medicare as part of the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program. Each year up to 20 products will be selected by HHS for the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program. Products subject to the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program are expected to experience a significant reduction in reimbursement from the Medicare program on a per unit basis.
▪our right to sublicense patentpatents and other rights to third parties under collaborative development relationships;
Our commercial success depends in part on our ability to develop, manufacture, market and sell our product candidates and use our proprietary technologies without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties. There is a substantial amount of litigation involving patents and other intellectual property rights in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, as well as administrative proceedings for challenging patents, including interference, derivation, inter partes review, post grant review, and reexamination proceedings before the USPTO or oppositions and other comparable proceedings in foreign jurisdictions. We may be exposed to, or threatened with, future litigation by third parties having patent or other intellectual property rights alleging that our product candidates and/or proprietary technologies infringe their intellectual property rights. Numerous U.S. and foreign issued patents and pending patent applications, which are owned by third parties, exist in the fields in which we are developing our product candidates. There may be third-party patents or patent applications with claims to materials, formulations, methods of manufacture or methods for treatment related to our product candidates and programs. As the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries expand and more patents are issued, the risk increases that our product candidates may give rise to claims of infringement of the patent rights of others. Moreover, it is not always clear to industry participants, including us, which patents cover various types of drugs, products or their methods of use or manufacture. Thus, because of the large number of patents issued and patent applications filed in our fields, there may be a risk that third parties may allege they have patent rights encompassing our product candidates, technologies or methods. We are aware of issued patents, in the United States and abroad, relating to methods of treating patients with PAH and methods of treating Duchenne muscular dystrophy.DMD. If any such patent were to be asserted against us, we believe that we have defenses against any such action, including that these patents would not be infringed by our product candidates and/or that these patents are not valid. However, if these patents were asserted against us and our defenses to such an action were unsuccessful, unless we obtain a license to these patents, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, we could be liable for damages and precluded from commercializing cibotercept or KER-065, as applicable,rinvatercept in certain indications, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.
Third parties may assert that we are employing their proprietary technology without authorization. Generally, conducting clinical trials and other development activities in the United States is protected under the Safe Harbor exemption as set forth in 35 U.S.C. § 271. If and when cibotercept, KER-065,rinvatercept, elritercept, or another one of our product candidates is approved by the FDA, that certain third party may then seek to enforce its patent by filing a patent infringement lawsuit against us. While we do not believe that any claims of such patent that could otherwise materially adversely affect commercialization of our product candidates, if approved, are valid and enforceable, we may be incorrect in this belief, or we may not be able to prove it in a litigation. In this regard, patents issued in the United States by law enjoy a presumption of validity that can be rebutted only with evidence that is “clear and convincing,” a heightened standard of proof. There may be third-party patents of which we are currently unaware with claims to materials, formulations, methods of manufacture or methods for treatment related to the use or manufacture of our product candidates. Because patent applications can take many years to issue, there may be currently pending patent applications which may later result in issued patents that our product candidates may infringe. In addition, third parties may obtain patents in the future and claim that use of our technologies infringes upon these patents. If any third-party patents were held by a court of competent jurisdiction to cover the manufacturing process of our product candidates, constructs or molecules used in or formed during the manufacturing process, or any final product itself, the holders of any such patents may be able to block our ability to commercialize the product candidate unless we obtained a license under the applicable patents, or until such patents expire or they are finally determined to be held invalid or unenforceable. Similarly, if any third-party patent were held by a court of competent jurisdiction to cover aspects of our formulations, processes for manufacture or methods of use, the holders of any such patent may be able to block our ability to develop and commercialize the product candidate unless we obtained a license or until such patent expires or is finally determined to be held invalid or unenforceable. In either case, such a license may not be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all. If we are unable to obtain a necessary license to a third-party patent on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, our ability to commercialize our product candidates may be impaired or delayed, which could in turn significantly harm our business. Even if we obtain a license, it may be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors access to the same technologies licensed to us. In addition, if the breadth or strength of protection provided by our patents and patent applications is threatened, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to license, develop or commercialize current or future product candidates.
Lastly, we may need to indemnify our customers and distributors against claims relating to the infringement of intellectual property rights of third parties related to our product candidates, including cibotercept, KER-065rinvatercept and elritercept. Third parties may assert infringement claims against our customers or distributors. These claims may require us to initiate or defend protracted and costly litigation on behalf of our customers or distributors, regardless of the merits of these claims. If any of these claims succeed, we may be forced to pay damages on behalf of our customers, suppliers or distributors, or may be required to obtain licenses for the product candidates or services they use. If we cannot obtain all necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms, our customers may be forced to stop using our products, if approved, or services.
We do not currently have the infrastructure or capability internally to manufacture our product candidates for use in the conduct of our preclinical studies and clinical trials or for commercial supply, if our products are approved. We rely on, and expect to continue to rely on, contract manufacturing organizations, or CMOs. Any replacement of our CMOs could require significant effort and expertise because there may be a limited number of qualified CMOs. This could be particularly problematic where we rely on a single-source supplier, as is currently the case for the manufacture of each of cibotercept, KER-065rinvatercept and elritercept.
We are highly dependent on our key personnel, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief MedicalScientific Officer. If we are not successful in attracting, motivating and retaining highly qualified personnel, we may not be able to successfully implement our business strategy.
Our ability to compete in the highly competitive biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries depends upon our ability to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified managerial, scientific and medical personnel. We are highly dependent on our management and particularly on the services of our scientific personnel including Jasbir Seehra, Ph.D., our Chief Executive Officer, Christopherand Rovaldi,Lorena Lerner, Ph.D., our Chief Operating Officer, and Yung H. Chyung, our Chief MedicalScientific Officer. We believe that their drug discovery and development experience and overall biopharmaceutical company management experience would be difficult to replace. Any of our executive officers could leave our employment at any time, as all of our employees are “at-will” employees. The loss of the services of our key personnel and any of our other executive officers, key employees, and scientific and medical advisors, and our inability to find suitable replacements, could result in delays in our research and development objectives and harm our business.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “October 2025 Share Repurchases”
New heading “November 2025 Issuer Tender Offer”
New heading “Operating Leases”
Largest changes
While recent trends towards rising inflation have eased, prices continue to rise, which may also materially affect our business and corresponding financial position and cash flows. Inflationary factors, such as increases in the cost of materials and supplies relating to our preclinical studies, clinical trials, interest rates and overhead costs may adversely affect our operating results. Rising interest rates and implementation of tariffs also present a recent challenge impacting the U.S. economy and could make it more difficult for us to obtain traditional financing on acceptable terms, if at all, in the future. Additionally, the general consensus among economists suggests that we should expect a higher recession risk to continue over the nextsee in full comparisonyear,year due in part to ongoing tariff and trade uncertainties, which, together with the foregoing, could result in further economic uncertainty and volatility in the capital markets in the near term, and could negatively affect our operations. Furthermore, such economic conditions have produced downward pressure on share prices. Although we do not believe thatinflation orinflation, higher interest rates or tariffs have had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations to date, we may experience increases in the near future (especially if inflation rates rise more quickly) on our operating costs, including our labor costs and research and development costs, due to supply chain constraints, consequences associated with public health crises and global geopolitical tensions, such as the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine and the war inIsrael,the Middle East, worsening global macroeconomic conditions, including as a result of bank failures, and employee availability and wage increases, which may result in additional stress on our working capital resources.
“On September 7, 2021, we entered into an indenture of lease, or the 1050 Waltham Lease, with Revolution Labs Owner, LLC, or the Landlord, pursuant to which we are leasing approximately 35,662 square feet of office, laboratory and vivarium space located at 1050 Waltham Street, Lexington, Massachusetts, or the Premises, for our new principal executive office. In December 2022, we received access to 31,991 square feet of office and laboratory space, or the Phase A Premises, which is considered a distinct lease component. …”see in full comparison
We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing novel therapeutics to treat a wide range of patients with disorders that are linked to dysfunctional signaling of the transforming growth factor-beta, or TGF-ß, family of proteins. We are a leader in understanding the role of the TGF-ß family of proteins, which are master regulators of the growth, repair and maintenance of a number of tissues, includingsee in full comparisonblood, bone,skeletal muscle,adiposebone, adipose, heart tissue andheart tissue.blood. By leveraging this understanding, we have discovered and are developing protein therapeutics that have the potential to provide meaningful and potentially disease-modifying benefit to patients.OneOurof ourlead productcandidates,candidate,ciboterceptrinvatercept (KER-012KER-065), is being developed for the treatment ofpulmonaryDuchennearterialmuscularhypertension, or PAH,dystrophy and for the treatment ofcardiovascularamyotrophicdisorders.lateralOur second product candidate, KER-065, is being developed for the treatment of neuromuscular diseases.sclerosis. Our most advanced product candidate, elritercept (KER-050), is being developed for the treatment of low blood cell counts, or cytopenias, including anemia and thrombocytopenia, in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, or MDS, and in patients with myelofibrosis. In December 2024, we entered into an exclusive license agreement with Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., or Takeda, which became effective on January 16, 2025, to further develop, manufacture and commercialize elritercept worldwide outside of mainland China, Hong Kong and Macau.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (59)
We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing novel therapeutics to treat a wide range of patients with disorders that are linked to dysfunctional signaling of the transforming growth factor-beta, or TGF-ß, family of proteins. We are a leader in understanding the role of the TGF-ß family of proteins, which are master regulators of the growth, repair and maintenance of a number of tissues, including blood, bone, skeletal muscle, adiposebone, adipose, heart tissue and heart tissue.blood. By leveraging this understanding, we have discovered and are developing protein therapeutics that have the potential to provide meaningful and potentially disease-modifying benefit to patients. OneOur of ourlead product candidates,candidate, ciboterceptrinvatercept (KER-012KER-065), is being developed for the treatment of pulmonaryDuchenne arterialmuscular hypertension, or PAH,dystrophy and for the treatment of cardiovascularamyotrophic disorders.lateral Our second product candidate, KER-065, is being developed for the treatment of neuromuscular diseases.sclerosis. Our most advanced product candidate, elritercept (KER-050), is being developed for the treatment of low blood cell counts, or cytopenias, including anemia and thrombocytopenia, in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, or MDS, and in patients with myelofibrosis. In December 2024, we entered into an exclusive license agreement with Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., or Takeda, which became effective on January 16, 2025, to further develop, manufacture and commercialize elritercept worldwide outside of mainland China, Hong Kong and Macau.
In December 2022, we filed a prospectus supplement to our registration statement on Form S-3ASR with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, for the issuance and sale, if any, of up to$250.0to $250.0 million of shares of our common stock pursuant to a sales agreement with Leerink Partners LLC, or Leerink, as sales agent, which we refer to as the ATM Sales Agreement, under which we may offer and sell, from time to time, shares of our common stock, or the ATM Shares, through Leerink, which we refer to as the ATM Offering. In May 2024, we filed a new registration statement on Form S-3ASR, which we refer to as the New Shelf Registration Statement, to replace the prior shelf registration statement that was set to expire, including a base prospectus, which became effective immediately upon filing, under which we could issue an unspecified amount of shares of our common stock, preferred stock, debt securities and warrants. In June 2024, we filed a prospectus supplement to the New Shelf Registration Statement for the issuance and sale, if any, of up to an additional $350.0 million of shares of our common stock under the ATM Sales Agreement. As of the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, we no longer qualified as a well-known seasoned issuer and therefore were not eligible to use the New Shelf Registration Statement as an automatic shelf registration statement, and no shares were sold during the year ended December 31, 2025.
Under the ATM Sales Agreement, Leerink may sell the ATM Shares by methods deemed to be an “at the market offering” as defined in Rule 415(a)(4) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We may sell the ATM Shares in amounts and at times to be determined by us from time to time subject to the terms and conditions of the ATM Sales Agreement, but we have no obligation to sell any of the ATM Shares in the ATM Offering. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we have sold a total of 4,290,096 shares of our common stock pursuant to the ATM Offering for aggregate net proceeds of approximately $228.6 million after deducting sales agent commissions and estimated offering expenses. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we may not offer and sell ATM shares at an aggregate offering price of up to the remaining $117.7 million available under theany ATM Offering.shares.
October 2025 Share Repurchases
On October 15, 2025, we entered into the Repurchase Agreements with the ADAR1 Parties and the Pontifax Parties. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Repurchase Agreements, the ADAR1 Parties and the Pontifax Parties sold all of the shares of our common stock beneficially owned by them, being an aggregate of 10,176,595 shares of common stock, to us at a per share purchase price of $17.75 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $180.6 million. In addition, concurrently with the execution of the Pontifax Repurchase Agreement, each of Tomer Kariv and Ran Nussbaum resigned from our board of directors and all committees thereof.
Pursuant to the Repurchase Agreements, each of the ADAR1 Parties and the Pontifax Parties agreed to customary standstill restrictions and voting commitments, which will remain in effect until immediately following the final certification of the voting results for our 2028 annual stockholder meeting. We and each of the ADAR1 Parties and the Pontifax Parties also agreed to customary mutual non-disparagement obligations to remain in effect during the same period.
November 2025 Issuer Tender Offer
On October 20, 2025, we announced that our board of directors authorized the Tender Offer, which we launched on October 20, 2025 and completed on November 21, 2025 On November 20, 2025, we disclosed that a total of 17,712,262 shares of our common stock were validly tendered and not validly withdrawn. In accordance with the terms and conditions of the Tender Offer, we accepted for purchase a total of 10,950,165 Tender Offer Shares at a purchase price of $17.75 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $194.4 million. As a result of the Tender Offer, we had 19,543,706 shares of common stock outstanding immediately following the closing of the Tender Offer.
WeSince our inception, we have incurred recurring operating losses sinceeach inceptionfiscal inyear 2015.through December 31, 2024. Our ability to generate product revenue sufficient to achieve profitability will depend on the successful development and commercialization of one or more of our product candidates. Our net lossincome, which was $187.4primarily million,driven $153.0by million,revenue andrelated $104.7to the Takeda Agreement, was $87.0 million for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2024,2025 2023,compared andto 2022,a respectively.net loss of $187.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $568.8$481.8 million. We expect to continue to generate operating losses and negative operating cash flows for the foreseeable future in connection with our ongoing activities.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had cash and cash equivalents of $559.9$287.4 million. Based on our current operating assumptions, we expect that our existing cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2024, together with the $200 million upfront payment pursuant to the license agreement with Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., or Takeda, which we received in February 2025,2025 will enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements into 2029.the first half of 2028. See “—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
While recent trends towards rising inflation have eased, prices continue to rise, which may also materially affect our business and corresponding financial position and cash flows. Inflationary factors, such as increases in the cost of materials and supplies relating to our preclinical studies, clinical trials, interest rates and overhead costs may adversely affect our operating results. Rising interest rates and implementation of tariffs also present a recent challenge impacting the U.S. economy and could make it more difficult for us to obtain traditional financing on acceptable terms, if at all, in the future. Additionally, the general consensus among economists suggests that we should expect a higher recession risk to continue over the next year,year due in part to ongoing tariff and trade uncertainties, which, together with the foregoing, could result in further economic uncertainty and volatility in the capital markets in the near term, and could negatively affect our operations. Furthermore, such economic conditions have produced downward pressure on share prices. Although we do not believe that inflation orinflation, higher interest rates or tariffs have had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations to date, we may experience increases in the near future (especially if inflation rates rise more quickly) on our operating costs, including our labor costs and research and development costs, due to supply chain constraints, consequences associated with public health crises and global geopolitical tensions, such as the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine and the war in Israel,the Middle East, worsening global macroeconomic conditions, including as a result of bank failures, and employee availability and wage increases, which may result in additional stress on our working capital resources.
Pursuant to the terms of the Hansoh Agreement, we received a net $18.0 million upfront payment in January 2022. We recognized $3.0 million as revenue and $0.3 million in withholding tax upon the achievement of a development milestone related to the Hansoh Agreement on our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2024, and a receivable, net of withholding tax, on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2024. In addition to the upfront payment and development milestones achieved to date, we are entitled to receive up to an aggregate of (i) $23.5 million upon the achievement of specified development milestones and (ii) $144.0 million upon the achievement of specified net sales thresholds for all licensed products in the Hansoh Territory. If a licensed product is approved for marketing in the Hansoh Territory, we will be entitled to receive royalty payments based on a tiered percentage of annual net sales in each region within the Hansoh Territory, with such percentage ranging from the low double digit to high teens, subject to specified potential royalty reductions. WeNo recognizedmilestones $3.0were millionachieved as revenue and $0.3 million in withholding tax upon the achievement of a development milestone related to the Hansoh Agreement on our consolidated statement of operations forduring the year ended December 31, 2024, and a receivable, net of withholding tax, on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2024.2025.
Effective in June 2023, in connection with the Hansoh Agreement, we entered into a manufacturing technology transfer agreement, or the Tech Transfer Agreement, with Hansoh. The Tech Transfer Agreement governs the transfer to Hansoh of all documents and information required to complete the manufacturing technology transfer. Under the Tech Transfer Agreement, Hansoh is obligated to make certain payments to us, at the rates set forth in the Tech Transfer Agreement, as manufacturing technology transfer services are provided over the term of the Tech Transfer Agreement. We recognized $96.1$0.1 thousandmillion and $150.8$0.1 thousandmillion of service and other revenue for the years ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively.
Effective in February 2024, in connection with the Hansoh Agreement, we entered into a clinical product supply agreement with Hansoh, or the Supply Agreement. We recognized $421.1$0.1 thousandmillion and $0.4 million of other revenue for the yearyears ended December 31, 2024.2025 and 2024, respectively.
Pursuant to the terms of the Takeda Agreement, we received a $200.0 million upfront payment in February 2025. In July 2025, we announced that the first patient was dosed in the Phase 3 RENEW clinical trial of elritercept, which triggered a $10.0 million milestone payment to us under the Takeda Agreement. We received the $10.0 million payment for the achievement of this development milestone in August 2025. In addition to the upfront payment and milestone payment, we are entitled to receive up to an aggregate of (i) $370.0$80.0 million upon the achievement of specified development andmilestones, (ii) $280.0 million upon the achievement of specified commercial milestones and (iiiii) $740.0 million upon the achievement of specified sales milestones. If a licensed product is approved for marketing in the Takeda Territory, we will be entitled to receive royalty payments based on tiered increments of annual net sales in the Takeda Territory, with such percentage ranging from the low double-digits to high teens, subject to specified potential royalty reductions.
Other Income (Expense),Expense, Net
Other income (expense),expense, net primarily consists of unrealized and realized gains and losses on foreign currency.currency and other taxes and fees.
The tax provision recorded for the year ended December 31, 20242025 resulted from withholdingincome tax related to taxable income generated from the HansohTakeda Agreement. We havecontinue notto recordedmaintain anya incomefull valuation allowance against our net deferred tax benefitsassets fordue the losses incurred as it is more likely than not that these benefits will not be realized based onto our history of losses and expected future losses.
Comparison for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023,2025 and 20222024
The following table summarizes our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023,2025 and 20222024 (in thousands):
We recognized $205.4 million of license revenue related to the upfront payment and achievement of a development milestone under the Takeda Agreement and $38.5 million of service and other revenue related to the transition services agreement with Takeda, or the TSA, for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to zero for the year ended December 31, 2024. In connection with the Hansoh Agreement, we recognized $0.2 million of service and other revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to $3.0 million of license revenue and $0.5 million of service and other revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024 consisted of service and other revenue substantially related to the Tech Transfer Agreement and Supply Agreement and license revenue related to the Hansoh Agreement. Our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2023 consisted of service and other revenue related to the Tech Transfer Agreement. We did not recognize any revenue for the year ended December 31, 2022.
The following table summarizes our research and development expenses for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023,2025 and 20222024 (in thousands):
Research and development expenses were $173.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $135.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase of $38.4 million was primarily due to an increase in program-related costs, including (i) an $8.8 million increase of cibotercept-related expenses, which was driven by a $7.1 million increase in clinical spend associated with our Phase 2 clinical trial and a $1.7 million increase in manufacturing costs; (ii) a $10.1 million increase in KER-065-related expenses, primarily driven by a net increase of $5.8 million in manufacturing and preclinical activities and an increase of $4.3 million in clinical spend associated with our ongoing Phase 1 clinical trial; (iii) a net increase of $3.1 million of elritercept-related expenses, primarily driven by a $9.7 million increase in clinical spend associated with our ongoing Phase 2 clinical trials, one in patients with MDS and one in patients with myelofibrosis, and the advancement of a Phase 3 clinical trial in patients with MDS, partially offset by a decrease of $6.6 million in manufacturing and preclinical activities; (iv) a $12.5 million increase in personnel costs, including an increase of $4.2 million of additional stock-based compensation costs, driven by the increase in headcount to support the advancement of our pipeline; (v) a $1.8 million increase in professional fees; and (v) a $2.4 million increase in facilities and supplies and other expenses due to the continued growth of our organization. These increases were partially offset by a $0.4 million decrease in preclinical pipeline and development activities.
Research and development expenses were $135.3$129.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023,2025, compared to $87.3$173.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022.2024. The increasedecrease of $48.0$44.0 million was primarily due to ana increasedecrease in program-related costs, including (i) ana $8.5$9.0 million increasedecrease of cibotercept-relatedrinvatercept-related expenses, which was driven by a $6.8net million increase in activities to support the clinical advancementdecrease of the program and a $1.7$7.8 million increase in manufacturing costs and preclinical activities and a $1.2 million decrease in clinical spend associated with our completed Phase 1 clinical trial; (ii) a net increasedecrease of $16.8$6.3 million ofin elritercept-related expenses, primarily driven by (a) a $5.5decrease of $8.4 million increase in clinical andspend preclinicalassociated program activities due to the progression ofwith our twoongoing Phase 2 clinical trials of elritercept,trials, one in patients with MDS and one in patients with myelofibrosis, and the initial expenses associated with our planned advancement of elritercept into athe Phase 3 RENEW clinical trialtrial, inas patientsclinical withactivities MDStransitioned andto (b)Takeda during 2025, partially offset by an increase of $11.3$2.1 million in manufacturing activities; (iii) a $3.2$17.2 million increasedecrease of cibotercept-related expenses, primarily driven by a $9.5 million decrease in clinical spend associated with our terminated Phase 2 clinical trial and a net decrease of $7.7 million in manufacturing and preclinical activities; (iv) a $5.2 million decrease in preclinical pipeline and development activities; and (ivv) a $15.7$8.3 million increasedecrease in personnel costs, including ana increasedecrease of $5.9$5.0 million of additional stock-based compensation costs, driven by thea reduction in headcount. These decreases were partially offset by (a) a $1.4 million increase in headcountprofessional to support the advancement of our pipeline;fees and (vb) a $4.4net increase of $0.6 million increase in facilities and supplies and other expenses due to the continued growth of our organization. These increases were partially offset by a $0.5 million decrease in professional fees.expenses.
We are no longer separately disclosing KER-047-related expenses in 2024 due to our decision to deprioritize the KER-047 program in 2023, and have updated prior period research and development expense tables to include KER-047-related expenses in preclinical expenses in order to provide a meaningful comparison of the year-over-year expenses. We expect research and development expenses to fluctuate from quarter to quarter depending on the timing of clinical trial activities, clinical manufacturing and other development activities.
General and administrative expenses were $40.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $34.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase of $5.9 million was primarily due to (i) a $3.6 million increase in personnel expenses, which includes an increase of $1.9 million of additional stock-based compensation costs, to support our organizational growth and achievement of our corporate goals; (ii) a net $0.6 million increase in facilities, supplies and other expenses due to growth of our organization; and (iii) a $2.3 million increase in professional fees. These increases were partially offset by a $0.6 million decrease in director and officer insurance premiums.
General and administrative expenses were $34.8$46.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023,2025, compared to $27.5$40.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2022.2024. The increase of $7.3$6.1 million was primarily due to (i) a $6.0$5.9 million increase in personnelprofessional expenses, which includes an increase of $4.2 million of additional stock-based compensation costs, to support our organizational growthfees and achievement of our corporate goals; (ii) a $1.5net $0.9 million increase in facilities, supplies and other office expenses due to growth of our organization; and (iii) a $0.7 million increase in professional fees.expenses. These increases were partially offset by (a) a $0.9$0.6 million decrease in personnel expenses, which includes a decrease of $1.2 million of stock-based compensation costs, partially offset by a net increase of $0.5 million in salaries and bonus, severance, benefits and other payroll costs and (b) a $0.1 million decrease in director and officer insurance premiums.
Total Other Income (Expense),Income, Net
Total other income (expense), net was $23.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $16.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase of $6.8 million is primarily related to an increase of $8.7 million of dividend income, partially offset by (i) a decrease of $1.2 million in R&D Incentive income in Australia; and (ii) an increase of $0.7 million in other expense, net.
Total other income (expense),income, net was $16.9$24.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023,2025, compared to $10.1$23.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2022.2024. The increase of $6.8$0.5 million iswas primarily related to (i) an increase of $11.1$1.4 million of dividend income,income and (ii) a decrease of $0.4 million in other expense, net, partially offset by a decrease of $4.7$1.2 million in R&D Incentive income in Australia.
Income tax provision was $4.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to zero for the years ended December 31, 2023, and 2022, respectively.2024. The increase of $0.3$4.6 million in income tax provision is attributed to withholding taxes related to the taxable income generated in 2024 from the HansohTakeda Agreement.
Since our inception, we have incurred significant operating losses.losses each fiscal year through December 31, 2024. Our net lossesincome, werewhich $187.4was million,primarily $153.0driven million,by andthe $104.7one-time upfront fee related to the Takeda Agreement, was $87.0 million for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2024,2025, 2023,compared andto 2022,a respectively.net loss of $187.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. As of December 31, 20242025 and December 31, 2023,2024, we had an accumulated deficit of $568.8$481.8 million and $381.4$568.8 million, respectively. To date, we have devoted the majority of our efforts into business planning, research and development of our product candidates, including conducting clinical trials and preclinical studies, raising capital and recruiting management and technical staff to support these operations. Our primary uses of cash are to fund operating expenses, primarily research and development expenditures. We expect ourto expensescontinue to increaseincur substantiallysubstantial expenses in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we advance the preclinical activitiesstudies and clinical trials of our product candidates. Furthermore, we expect to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company, including significant legal, accounting, investor relations, director and officer insurance premiums and other expenses. In addition, if we obtain marketing approval for any of our product candidates, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to establishing sales, marketing, distribution and other commercial infrastructure to commercialize such products.
We currently do not have any products approved for sale. We do not expect to generate any revenue from product sales unless and until we successfully complete development and obtain regulatory approval for one or more of our product candidates, which we expect will take a number of years. Since our inception, we have funded our operations primarily through equity financings and throughfinancings, research collaborations or licensing of intellectual property.
In December 2022, we filed a prospectus supplement to a registration statement on Form S-3ASR, including a base prospectus and sales agreement prospectus, or the Prior Shelf Registration Statement, for the issuance and sale of up to $250.0 million of shares of our common stock. On May 3, 2024, we filed a new registration statement on Form S-3ASR, or the New Shelf Registration Statement, to replace the Prior Shelf Registration Statement that was set to expire, which became automatically effective upon filing, and which permits us to offer, from time to time, an unspecified amount of common stock, preferred stock, debt securities and warrants, including through an “at the market” program with Leerink, as sales agent, or the ATM Program. As of andthe duringfiling of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, we no longer qualified as a well-known seasoned issuer and therefore were not eligible to use the New Shelf Registration Statement as an automatic shelf registration statement. As of December 31, 2025, we have sold a total of 4,290,096 shares of our common stock pursuant to the ATM Program for aggregate net proceeds of approximately $228.6 million after deducting sales agent commissions and estimated offering expenses.Program. As of December 31, 2024,2025, we were not eligible to offer and sell,sell from time to time,any shares of our common stock for an aggregate offering amount of up to the remaining $117.7 million available under the ATM Program.Program Weand anticipatedid thatnot sell any shares during the filingyear ofended thisDecember Annual31, Report on Form 10-K will render us unable to use our currently effective New Shelf Registration Statement as we expect that, on the date of filing of this report, we will no longer meet the criteria of a well-known seasoned issuer. Accordingly, we will need to file a post-effective amendment to the New Shelf Registration Statement to convert it to a non-automatic shelf registration statement that we are eligible to use, or to file a new shelf registration statement on Form S-3. Such post-effective amendment or shelf registration statement on Form S-3 is subject to review by the SEC and must be declared effective by the SEC, which could delay our ability to raise debt or equity capital under the registration statement and may adversely affect our ability to access financing and the capital markets in a timely fashion.2025.
In October 2025, we entered into the Repurchase Agreements, pursuant to which the ADAR1 Parties and the Pontifax Parties sold all of the shares of our common stock beneficially owned by them, being an aggregate of 10,176,595 shares of common stock, to us at a per share purchase price of $17.75 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $180.6 million.
In November 2025, we completed our Tender Offer and accepted for purchase a total of 10,950,165 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $17.75 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $194.4 million.
As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had cash and cash equivalents of $559.9$287.4 million. Based on our current operating assumptions, we believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, together with the $200.0 million upfront payment pursuant to the license agreement with Takeda, or the Takeda Agreement, which we received in February 2025,equivalents will be sufficient to fund our projected liquidity requirements into 2029.the first half of 2028. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could use our capital resources sooner than we currently expect. Due to the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with the development of our product candidates and programs, and because the extent to which we may enter into collaborations with third parties for development of our product candidates is unknown, we are unable to estimate the timing and amounts of increased capital outlays and operating expenses associated with completing the research and development of our product candidates. Our future funding requirements, both near and long-term, will depend on many factors, including:
▪the timing and amount of milestone and royalty payments we are required to make or are eligible to receive under our license agreements with each of The General Hospital CorporationCorporation, Hansoh and HansohTakeda;
▪the cost of manufacturing cibotercept, KER-065, elriterceptrinvatercept and future product candidates for clinical trials in preparation for marketing approval and in preparation for commercialization;
In addition, implementation of tariffs, public health crises, bank failures, geopolitical tensions and resulting global slowdown of economic activity continue to rapidly evolve and have already resulted in a significant disruption of global financial markets. If the disruption persists and deepens, we could experience an inability to access additional capital when and if needed. If we are unable to obtain funding, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate some or all of our research and development programs and clinical development efforts, which would adversely affect our business prospects, or we may be unable to continue operations. We do not have any committed external source of funds or other support for our development efforts and we cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Until we can generate sufficient product or royalty revenue to finance our cash requirements, which we may never do, we expect to finance our future cash needs through a combination of public or private equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, strategic alliances, licensing arrangements and other marketing or distribution arrangements. Adequate additional funding may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. Any failure to raise capital as and when needed could have a negative impact on our financial condition and on our ability to pursue our business plans and strategies.
Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities was $160.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, which was driven by a net loss of $187.4 million and $11.4 million net cash used by operating assets and liabilities, partially offset by non-cash charges including $34.9 million of stock-based compensation expense, $1.8 million in lease expenses and $1.2 million in depreciation. The $11.4 million of cash used by operating assets and liabilities was primarily comprised of (i) a $10.2 million increase in prepaid expenses and other assets due to timing of expense recognition for our research and development costs; (ii) a $2.6 million increase in accounts receivable; and (iii) a $1.3 million change in operating lease liabilities. which was partially offset by a $2.7 million increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses to support the advancement of our programs.
Net cash used in operating activities was $124.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, which was driven by a net loss of $153.0 million and $2.7 million net cash used by operating assets and liabilities and non-cash charges, partially offset by non-cash charges including $28.8 million of stock-based compensation expense, $1.6 million in lease expenses and $0.8 million in depreciation. The $2.7 million of cash used in operating assets and liabilities was primarily comprised of (i) a $9.8 million increase in prepaid expenses and other assets due to timing of expense recognition for our research and development costs and (ii) a $0.1 million increase in accounts receivable, which was partially offset by (a) a $6.9 million increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses to support the advancement of our programs and (b) a $0.4 million change in operating lease liabilities.
Net cash usedprovided inby operating activities was $70.1$107.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022,2025, which was driven by (i) a net lossincome of $104.7 million, partially offset by a $14.3$87.0 million increase in net cash provided by operating assets and liabilities and(ii) non-cash charges, $18.7including $28.7 million of stock-based compensation expense, $0.9$2.4 million in lease expenses and $0.7$1.5 million in depreciation.depreciation, partially offset by $12.1 million net cash used by operating assets and liabilities. The $14.3$12.1 million of cash used inby operating assets and liabilities was primarily comprised of (i) ana $18.0$13.1 million decrease in accounts receivable and (ii) a $4.9 million increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses toprimarily supportdriven by the advancementtransition of ouractivities programs,to whichTakeda wasand reduction in other clinical spend; (ii) a $2.3 million increase in current income tax receivable; (iii) a $0.8 million increase in accounts receivable; and (iv) a $2.0 million change in operating lease liabilities; partially offset by (a) a $4.9$6.1 million increasedecrease in prepaid expenses and other assets due to timing of expense recognition for our research and development costs and (b) a $3.7 million change in our operating lease liabilities.costs.
Net cash used in operating activities was $160.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, which was driven by a net loss of $187.4 million and $11.4 million net cash used by operating assets and liabilities, partially offset by non-cash charges, including $34.9 million of stock-based compensation expense, $1.8 million in lease expenses and $1.2 million in depreciation. The $11.4 million of cash used by operating assets and liabilities was primarily comprised of (i) a $10.2 million increase in prepaid expenses and other assets due to timing of expense recognition for our research and development costs; (ii) a $2.6 million increase in accounts receivable; and (iii) a $1.3 million change in operating lease liabilities, which was partially offset by a $2.7 million increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses to support the advancement of our programs.
Net cash used in investing activities was $1.9$1.6 million, $2.5 million,million and $1.2$1.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023,2025 and 2022,2024, respectively. The cash used in investing activities in each period was due to purchases of property and equipment.
Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities was $378.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, which was primarily related to $375.0 million used to repurchase shares of common stock via the ADAR1 Repurchase Agreement, the Pontifax Repurchase Agreement and the Tender Offer and $3.9 million in cash paid for direct expenses associated with the Repurchase Agreements and the Tender Offer, which was partially offset by (i) proceeds from short-swing profit settlement of $0.1 million, (ii) proceeds of $0.1 million related to issuance of common stock under the employee stock purchase plan; and (iii) proceeds of $0.2 million related to exercises of options to purchase common stock.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $179.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, which was primarily related to (i) net proceeds of $175.7 million received from sales of our common stock under the ATM Program, after deducting sales agent commissions and offering expenses; and (ii) proceeds of $3.2 million related to exercises of options to purchase common stock.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $120.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, which was primarily related to (i) net proceeds of $119.5 million received from sales of our common stock under the ATM Sales Agreement, after deducting sales agent commissions and before deducting offering expenses; and (ii) proceeds of $0.8 million related to exercises of options to purchase common stock.
In October 2025, we announced that we plan to distribute 25% of any net cash proceeds we receive on or before December 31, 2028 from the Takeda Agreement to our stockholders.
Operating Leases
Our lease commitments reflect payments due for our lease and sublease agreements for office and laboratory space in Lexington, Massachusetts that expire in 2031 and 2029, respectively. As of December 31, 2025, our contractual commitments for our leases were $22.0 million, which will be paid over the term of such leases. For additional information on our leases and timing of future payments, please read Note 13, Leases, to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2024 and the effects such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods (in thousands):
On September 7, 2021, we entered into an indenture of lease, or the 1050 Waltham Lease, with Revolution Labs Owner, LLC, or the Landlord, pursuant to which we are leasing approximately 35,662 square feet of office, laboratory and vivarium space located at 1050 Waltham Street, Lexington, Massachusetts, or the Premises, for our new principal executive office. In December 2022, we received access to 31,991 square feet of office and laboratory space, or the Phase A Premises, which is considered a distinct lease component. In January 2023, we entered into a first amendment to the 1050 Waltham Lease, or the Lease Amendment. Under the terms of the Lease Amendment, we agreed to the phased delivery of the Premises to us by the Landlord, with the Phase A Premises delivered first, and the additional approximately 3,671 rentable square feet of vivarium space, or the Phase B Premises, delivered at a later date, and established the rent commencement dates for the Phase A Premises and the Phase B Premises accordingly. In March 2023, we received access to the Phase B Premises. Rent commenced in November 2023 for the Premises. The 1050 Waltham Lease is expected to expire on November 30, 2031. In July 2024, we entered into a sublease, or the Sublease Agreement, with Accent Therapeutics, Inc., pursuant to which we sublet approximately 20,000 square feet of office and laboratory space located at 1050 Waltham Street, Lexington, Massachusetts, expanding our existing headquarters. The Sublease Agreement expires on September 30, 2029.
If the contract contains a single performance obligation, the entire transaction price is allocated to the single performance obligation. Contracts that contain multiple performance obligations require an allocation of the transaction price to each performance obligation on a relative stand-alone selling price basis. We must develop assumptions that require judgment to determine the stand-alone selling price for each performance obligation identified in the contract. We utilize key assumptions to determine the stand-alone selling price, which may include other comparable transactions, pricing considered in negotiating the transaction and the estimated costs.
The consideration allocated to each performance obligation is recognized as revenue when control is transferred for the related goods or services. If the license to our intellectual property is determined to be distinct from the other performance obligations identified in the arrangement, we recognize revenue from consideration allocated to the license when the license is transferred to the customer and the customer can use and benefit from the license. For performance obligations which consist of licenses and other promises, we utilize judgment to assess the nature of the combined performance obligation to determine whether the combined performance obligation is satisfied over time or at a point in time and, if over time, the appropriate method of measuring progress. We evaluate the measure of progress each reporting period and, if necessary, adjust the measure of performance and related revenue recognition.
We account for all stock-based compensation awards granted to employees and non-employees as stock-based compensation expense at fair value. Our stock-based awards include stock options and performance-basedrestricted stock options.unit, or RSU, awards. The measurement date for awards is the date of grant. For stockstock-based optionsawards that vest based on service conditions, stock-based compensation costs are recognized as expense over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period, on a straight-line basis. For stock options and RSUs with performance conditions, stock-based compensation costs are recognized as expense using the accelerated attribution method when it is probable that the performance condition will be achieved. Our Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires the input of subjective assumptions, including the expected volatility of the price of our common stock. We lack company-specific historical and implied volatility information. Therefore, we estimate our expected stock volatility based on the historical volatility of a group of publicly traded set of peer companiescompanies, andweighted expect to continue to do so until such time as we have adequate historical data regarding the volatility ofwith our own tradedhistorical volatility for the period during which our stock price.has been publicly traded. These estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. If factors change and these assumptions either increase or decrease, our stock-based compensation expense could materially differ in the future. Stock-based compensation expense is classified in the accompanying statements of operations based on the function to which the related services are provided. We recognize stock-based compensation expense for the portion of awards that have vested. Forfeitures are recorded as they occur. The fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
Removed heading “Our corporate restructuring announced in May 2025 may not result in anticipated savings, could result in total costs and expenses that are greater than expected and could disrupt our business.”
Largest changes
“On May 29, 2025, we announced the implementation of a corporate restructuring, including a reduction in force of approximately 45% of our then-current employee base across all functions, or the 2025 Restructuring. We substantially completed the 2025 Restructuring at the end of July 2025. As a result of the 2025 Restructuring, we estimated that we realize average annualized cost savings of approximately $17 million. However, these estimates are subject to several assumptions, and actual results may differ. …”see in full comparison
“Our corporate restructuring announced in May 2025 may not result in anticipated savings, could result in total costs and expenses that are greater than expected and could disrupt our business.”see in full comparison
In addition, on December 11, 2025, the European Commission, the European Parliament and the European Council reached a political agreement on a comprehensive overhaul of EU pharmaceutical legislation, or the Pharma Package. The reform has been under negotiation since the European Commission submitted its proposal in April 2023. This packagesee in full comparison-– comprised of a new directive and regulation to replace existing legislation – aims to modernize the EU framework. The political agreement is currently subject to formal approval by the European Parliament and Council. Ifapprovedadopted substantially intheitsformproposedproposed,form, the Pharma Packagewill,could, among other changes, reduce the baseline market protection period by one year,with limited opportunities for extensions, capped at a maximum of 11 years;reshape the incentives regime for orphan medicinalproducts,products (including byintroducingreducing“breakthrough”the baseline orphanmedicinalmarketproductsexclusivity–fromthosetenaddressingtodiseasesnine years and replacing the current indication-based system withnoaavailableproduct-basedmedicinalapproachtreatment –under which subsequent orphan indications for the same active substance will no longer benefit from11separateyearsperiods of market exclusivity;), and expand the Bolar exemption to permit generic and biosimilar manufacturers to conduct preparatory activities for regulatory submissions, including pricing and reimbursement, and participate in procurement tenders while patent protection remains in force.AUnderdecreasetheinagreed transitional provisions, marketing authorizations already granted, and marketing authorization applications submitted before the new regulation becomes applicable, will generally continue to be governed by current protection rules; however, any marketing authorization application we submit after that date, any subsequent application for an additional orphan indication, and the expanded Bolar exemption (for which no transitional protection applies) could reduce the period of market exclusivityopportunitiesavailableforto our product candidates in theEU,EUcombinedandwithacceleratethe expanded Bolar exemption, could open themexposure to generic or biosimilarcompetition earlier than under the current regime,competition, potentially materially impactingreimbursement status andthe commercial prospects of our product candidates. The new framework is expected to enter into force in 2026/2027 and to be subject to transitional arrangements, with full application not anticipated before 2028.
“Established pharmaceutical companies may also invest heavily to accelerate discovery and development of novel therapeutics or to in-license novel therapeutics that could make the product candidates that we develop obsolete. Mergers and acquisitions in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries may result in even more resources being concentrated in our competitors. Competition may increase further as a result of advances in the commercial applicability of technologies and greater availability of capital for investment in these industries. …”see in full comparison
The biopharmaceutical industry is characterized by intense competition and rapid innovation. Our competitors may be able to develop other compounds or drugs that are able to achieve similar or better results. Our potential competitors include major multinational pharmaceutical companies, established biotechnology companies, specialty pharmaceutical companies and universities and other research institutions. Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial, technical and other resources, such as larger research and development staff and experienced marketing and manufacturing organizations and well-established sales forces. Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly as they develop novel approaches to treating disease indications that our product candidates are also focused on treating.see in full comparisonEstablished pharmaceutical companies may also invest heavily to accelerate discovery and development of novel therapeutics or to in-license novel therapeutics that could make the product candidates that we develop obsolete. Mergers and acquisitions in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries may result in even more resources being concentrated in our competitors. Competition may increase further as a result of advances in the commercial applicability of technologies and greater availability of capital for investment in these industries. Our competitors, either alone or with collaborative partners, may succeed in developing, acquiring or licensing on an exclusive basis drug or biologic products that are more effective, safer, more easily commercialized or less costly than our product candidates or may develop proprietary technologies or secure patent protection that we may need for the development of our technologies and products. We believe the key competitive factors that will affect the development and commercial success of our product candidates are efficacy, safety, tolerability, reliability, convenience of use, price and reimbursement.
Additionally, some of the clinical trials we conduct may include open-label trials conducted at a limited number of clinical sites on a limited number of patients. For example,see in full comparisonourthe ongoing Phase 2 clinical trials of elritercept, one in patients with lower-risk MDS and one in patients with myelofibrosis,areandopen-labelourtrials. Our plannedongoing Phase 2 clinical trial of rinvatercept in patients withDMDDMD,is also expected to be anare open-labeltrial.trials. An “open-label” clinical trial is one where both the patient and investigator know whether the patient is receiving the investigational product candidate or either an existing approved product or placebo. Most typically, open-label clinical trials test only the investigational product candidate and sometimes may do so at different dose levels. For example, in our ongoing Phase 2 clinical trial for rinvatercept in patients with DMD, rinvatercept is being administered at a starting dose of 0.5 mg/kg, and, based on individual titration rules, the dose may be escalated in 0.5 mg/kg increments after two doses, up to a maximum dose of 2.0 mg/kg.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (31)
We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company with a limited operating history. Since our inception in 2015, we have invested most of our resources in developing our product candidates, building our intellectual property portfolio, developing our supply chain, conducting business planning, raising capital and providing general and administrative support for these operations. Consequently, we have no meaningful operations upon which to evaluate our business and predictions about our future success or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a longer operating history or a history of successfully developing and commercializing drug products. Investment in biopharmaceutical product development is highly speculative because it entails substantial upfront capital expenditures and significant risk that any potential product candidate will fail to demonstrate adequate effect or an acceptable safety profile, gain regulatory approval and become commercially viable. We have not yet demonstrated the ability to progress any product candidate through late-stage clinical trials, we have no products approved for commercial sale and we have not generated any revenue from product sales to date. While we were profitable in the year ended December 31, 2025, this was primarily driven by the one-time upfront payment from our license agreement with Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., or Takeda. We continue to incur significant research and development and other expenses related to our ongoing operations. As a result, we have incurred losses in all fiscal years prior to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. For the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we reported a net loss of $23.7$28.7 million and as$52.4 million, respectively. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $505.5$534.2 million. We expect to continue to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future, and we expect these losses to increase as we continue our research and development of, and seek regulatory approvals for, our lead product candidate, rinvatercept, our most advanced product candidate, elritercept, and any future product candidates we may develop.
■commenceprogress our Phase 2 clinical trial of rinvatercept in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, or DMD;
■continue the research and development of our other clinical- and preclinical-stage product candidates and discovery-stage programs;
■commence a Phase 3 clinical trial of elritercept in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome, or MDS;
To date, we have funded our operations primarily through private placements of our equity securities, upfront, milestone and expense reimbursement payments received from our collaborators, from our initial public offering, or IPO, in April 2020, from our public offerings of common stock in November 2020 and January 2024, and from our “at-the-market offering,” in connection with our Sales Agreement with Leerink Partners LLC, or Leerink, as agent, pursuant to which we may offer and sell, from time to time, shares of our common stock through Leerink, or the ATM Offering. We expect our expenses to increase in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we commenceprogress our two Phase 2 clinical trialstrial of rinvatercept, onerinvatercept in patients with DMD and onecommence our Phase 2 clinical trial of rinvatercept in patients with ALS, and continue to research, develop and initiate clinical trials of any other future product candidates. In addition, if we obtain regulatory approval for any of our product candidates, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to product manufacturing, marketing, sales and distribution. Furthermore, we expect to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funding in connection with our continuing operations. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our product development programs or any future commercialization efforts.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had $281.5$257.6 million in cash and cash equivalents. Based on our current operating assumptions, we expect that our existing cash and cash equivalents as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 will enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements into the first half of 2028. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could use our capital resources sooner than we currently expect. Our future capital requirements for rinvatercept, elritercept or our other preclinical programs will depend on many factors, including:
Additionally, some of the clinical trials we conduct may include open-label trials conducted at a limited number of clinical sites on a limited number of patients. For example, ourthe ongoing Phase 2 clinical trials of elritercept, one in patients with lower-risk MDS and one in patients with myelofibrosis, areand open-labelour trials. Our plannedongoing Phase 2 clinical trial of rinvatercept in patients with DMDDMD, is also expected to be anare open-label trial.trials. An “open-label” clinical trial is one where both the patient and investigator know whether the patient is receiving the investigational product candidate or either an existing approved product or placebo. Most typically, open-label clinical trials test only the investigational product candidate and sometimes may do so at different dose levels. For example, in our ongoing Phase 2 clinical trial for rinvatercept in patients with DMD, rinvatercept is being administered at a starting dose of 0.5 mg/kg, and, based on individual titration rules, the dose may be escalated in 0.5 mg/kg increments after two doses, up to a maximum dose of 2.0 mg/kg.
Most typically, open-label clinical trials test only the investigational product candidate and sometimes may do so at different dose levels. For example, in our ongoing Phase 2 clinical trial for elritercept in patients with lower-risk MDS, the dose levels for Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of Part 1 of the trial were 0.75 mg/kg, 1.5 mg/kg, 2.5 mg/kg, 3.75 mg/kg and 5.0 mg/kg, respectively.
Open-label clinical trials are also subject to various limitations that may exaggerate any therapeutic effect as patients in open-label clinical trials are aware when they are receiving treatment. Open-label clinical trials may be subject to a “patient bias” where patients perceive their symptoms to have improved merely due to their awareness of receiving an experimental treatment. In addition, open-label clinical trials may be subject to an “investigator bias” where those assessing and reviewing the physiological outcomes of the clinical trials are aware of which patients have received treatment and may interpret the information of the treated group more favorably given this knowledge. Given that two open-label Phase 2 clinical trials are ongoing for elritercept, one in patients with lower-risk MDS and one in patients with myelofibrosis, and one open-label Phase 2 clinical trial is plannedongoing for rinvatercept,rinvatercept in patients with DMD, the results from these clinical trialstrial may not be predictive of future clinical trial results with these or other product candidates for which we include an open-label clinical trial, when studied in a controlled environment with a placebo or active control.
The policies of the FDA and of comparable foreign regulatory authorities may change and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of our product candidates. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad. As an example, the regulatory landscape related to clinical trials in the EU has evolved. The EU Clinical Trials Regulation,Regulation (EU) No 536/2014, or CTR, which was adopted in April 2014 and repealsrepealed the EU Clinical Trials Directive, or CTD, became applicable on January 31, 2022. The CTR permits trial sponsors to make a single submission to both the competent authority and an ethics committee in each EU Member State, leading to a single decision for each EU Member State. The assessment procedure for the authorization of clinical trials has been harmonized as well, including a joint assessment of some elements of the application by all EU Member States in which the trial is to be conducted, and a separate assessment by each EU Member State with respect to specific requirements related to its own territory, including ethics rules. Each EU Member State’s decision is communicated to the sponsor through a centralized EU portal, the Clinical Trial Information System, or CTIS. In addition, the CTR requires the publication of certain data and documents in relation to the conduct of a clinical trial, which will take place in accordance with specific timelines. The timelines are established by the European Medicines Agency, or the EMA, and are determined based on the documents and the categorization of the clinical trial. The CTR provided a three-year transition period that ended on January 31, 2025. Since this date, all new or ongoing trials are subject to the provisions of the CTR. Our compliance with the CTR requirements and that of our third-party service providers, such as CROs, may impact our developmentsdevelopment plans.
The UK regulatory framework in relation to clinical trials is governed by the Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004, as amended, which is derived from the CTD, as implemented into UK national law through secondary legislation. Following a public consultation that began in 2022, theThe United Kingdom government has enacted new legislation to overhaul the clinical trials regulatory framework. In April 2025, the UK adopted an amendment to the Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) (Amendment) Regulations 20042025, intended to support a more streamlined and flexible regulation of clinical trials, remove unnecessary administrative burdens on trial sponsors, and protect the interests of trial participants. It also intends to bring the UK regulatory framework for clinical trials into closer alignment with the CTR. The amendment will becomebecame applicable on April 28, 2026 following a one-year transition period. While these changes introduce efficienciesefficiencies, the new requirements may impose additional compliance burdens on us and alignour withCROs someconducting principlestrials ofin the CTR,United Kingdom and could result in increased costs or delays in trial initiation or conduct. Any significant divergence between the United Kingdom and EU regulatory systems remains. Any significant divergence could affect the cost and complexity of conducting clinical trials in the United Kingdom and may impact the acceptability of United Kingdom-based trial data for seeking marketing authorizations in the EU, and vice versa.
In addition, on December 11, 2025, the European Commission, the European Parliament and the European Council reached a political agreement on a comprehensive overhaul of EU pharmaceutical legislation, or the Pharma Package. The reform has been under negotiation since the European Commission submitted its proposal in April 2023. This package -– comprised of a new directive and regulation to replace existing legislation – aims to modernize the EU framework. The political agreement is currently subject to formal approval by the European Parliament and Council. If approvedadopted substantially in theits formproposed proposed,form, the Pharma Package will,could, among other changes, reduce the baseline market protection period by one year, with limited opportunities for extensions, capped at a maximum of 11 years; reshape the incentives regime for orphan medicinal products,products (including by introducingreducing “breakthrough”the baseline orphan medicinalmarket productsexclusivity –from thoseten addressingto diseasesnine years and replacing the current indication-based system with noa availableproduct-based medicinalapproach treatment –under which subsequent orphan indications for the same active substance will no longer benefit from 11separate yearsperiods of market exclusivity;), and expand the Bolar exemption to permit generic and biosimilar manufacturers to conduct preparatory activities for regulatory submissions, including pricing and reimbursement, and participate in procurement tenders while patent protection remains in force. AUnder decreasethe inagreed transitional provisions, marketing authorizations already granted, and marketing authorization applications submitted before the new regulation becomes applicable, will generally continue to be governed by current protection rules; however, any marketing authorization application we submit after that date, any subsequent application for an additional orphan indication, and the expanded Bolar exemption (for which no transitional protection applies) could reduce the period of market exclusivity opportunitiesavailable forto our product candidates in the EU,EU combinedand withaccelerate the expanded Bolar exemption, could open themexposure to generic or biosimilar competition earlier than under the current regime,competition, potentially materially impacting reimbursement status and the commercial prospects of our product candidates. The new framework is expected to enter into force in 2026/2027 and to be subject to transitional arrangements, with full application not anticipated before 2028.
The biopharmaceutical industry is characterized by intense competition and rapid innovation. Our competitors may be able to develop other compounds or drugs that are able to achieve similar or better results. Our potential competitors include major multinational pharmaceutical companies, established biotechnology companies, specialty pharmaceutical companies and universities and other research institutions. Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial, technical and other resources, such as larger research and development staff and experienced marketing and manufacturing organizations and well-established sales forces. Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly as they develop novel approaches to treating disease indications that our product candidates are also focused on treating. Established pharmaceutical companies may also invest heavily to accelerate discovery and development of novel therapeutics or to in-license novel therapeutics that could make the product candidates that we develop obsolete. Mergers and acquisitions in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries may result in even more resources being concentrated in our competitors. Competition may increase further as a result of advances in the commercial applicability of technologies and greater availability of capital for investment in these industries. Our competitors, either alone or with collaborative partners, may succeed in developing, acquiring or licensing on an exclusive basis drug or biologic products that are more effective, safer, more easily commercialized or less costly than our product candidates or may develop proprietary technologies or secure patent protection that we may need for the development of our technologies and products. We believe the key competitive factors that will affect the development and commercial success of our product candidates are efficacy, safety, tolerability, reliability, convenience of use, price and reimbursement.
Established pharmaceutical companies may also invest heavily to accelerate discovery and development of novel therapeutics or to in-license novel therapeutics that could make the product candidates that we develop obsolete. Mergers and acquisitions in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries may result in even more resources being concentrated in our competitors. Competition may increase further as a result of advances in the commercial applicability of technologies and greater availability of capital for investment in these industries. Our competitors, either alone or with collaborative partners, may succeed in developing, acquiring or licensing on an exclusive basis drug or biologic products that are more effective, safer, more easily commercialized or less costly than our product candidates or may develop proprietary technologies or secure patent protection that we may need for the development of our technologies and products. We believe the key competitive factors that will affect the development and commercial success of our product candidates are efficacy, safety, tolerability, reliability, convenience of use, price and reimbursement.
In addition, several companies are developing gene therapies to treat DMD, including REGENXBIO Inc. and Solid Biosciences Inc. RNA-targeted treatments that are in clinical and preclinical development are also being pursued by several companies, including Avidity Biosciences, Inc., Wave Life Sciences Ltd., Dyne Therapeutics, Inc. and Sarepta. Edgewise Therapeutics, Inc. (which was acquired by Servier in July 2026) is developing sevasemten, a myosin ATPase inhibitor, for both DMD and Becker muscular dystrophy. Satellos Bioscience Inc. is developing SAT-3277, an AAK1 inhibitor, for the treatment of DMD. Capricor Therapeutics, Inc. is developing Deramiocel, a cell therapy, for the treatment of DMD.
There are three therapies approved by FDA to treat ALS and its symptoms: riluzole, an anti-glutamatergic agent; edaravone, a free-radical scavenger; and tofersen, an antisense oligonucleotide treatment of SOD1-ALS. One additional therapeutic, sodium phenylbutyrate and taurursodiol, was approved under an accelerated pathway by the FDA but subsequently withdrawn from the market following negative results from a confirmatory Phase 3 trial. To the best of our knowledge, there are no other companies developing product candidates to treat ALS by targeting skeletal muscle. However, several companies are developing product candidates to treat ALS through other mechanisms, including Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Novartis AG and Genervon Biopharmaceuticals LLC.
There are three therapies approved by FDA to treat ALS and its symptoms: riluzole, an anti-glutamatergic agent; edaravone, a free-radical scavenger; and tofersen, an antisense oligonucleotide treatment of SOD1-ALS. One additional therapeutic, sodium phenylbutyrate and taurursodiol, was approved under an accelerated pathway by the FDA but subsequently withdrawn from the market following negative results from a confirmatory Phase 3 trial. To the best of our knowledge, there are no other companies developing product candidates to treat ALS by targeting skeletal muscle. However, several companies are developing product candidates to treat ALS through other mechanisms, including Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Novartis AG and Genervon Biopharmaceuticals LLC. Kyntra Bio Inc. (formerly FibroGen Inc.) and Astellas Pharma Inc. are developing product candidates for the treatment of anemia, and Merck & Co. Inc., or Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Disc Medicine are developing product candidates targeting diseases associated with MDS and myelofibrosis, including chronic anemia. Additionally, in April 2020, Merck and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company received FDA approval of its product, Reblozyl, for the treatment of anemia failing an erythropoiesis stimulating agent and requiring two or more red blood cell units over eight weeks in adult patients with very low- to intermediate-risk MDS with ring sideroblasts or with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis. In June 2020, Merck further announced that the European Commission approved Reblozyl for the treatment of transfusion-dependent anemia in adult patients with MDS or beta thalassemia and in September 2020, Merck announced that Health Canada approved Reblozyl for the treatment of adult patients with red blood cell transfusion-dependent anemia associated with beta thalassemia. In August 2023, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company announced that the FDA approved Reblozyl for the treatment of anemia without previous erythropoiesis stimulating agent use (ESA-naïve) in adult patients with very low- to intermediate-risk MDS who may require regular red blood cell transfusions. In April 2024, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company further announced that the European Commission expanded approval of Reblozyl to include treatment of adult patients with and without ring sideroblasts with transfusion-dependent anemia due to lower-risk MDS. In June 2024, Geron Corporation announced that the FDA approved imetelstat (RYTELO) for the treatment of adult patients with low- to intermediate-1 risk MDS with transfusion-dependent anemia requiring four or more red blood cell units over eight weeks who have not responded to or have lost response to or are ineligible for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.
We have never commercialized a product candidate for any indication. Even if our product candidates are approved by the appropriate regulatory authorities for marketing and sale, they may not gain acceptance among physicians, patients, third-party payors and others in the medical community. If any product candidates for which we obtain regulatory approval doesdo not gain an adequate level of market acceptance, we could be prevented from or significantly delayed in achieving profitability. Market acceptance of our product candidates by the medical community, patients and third-party payors will depend on a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control. For example, physicians are often reluctant to switch their patients and patients may be reluctant to switch from existing therapies even when new and potentially more effective or safer treatments enter the market.
Individual states in the United States have also increasingly passed legislation and implemented regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. For example, on June 15, 2026, the FDA approved Colorado’s Section 804 Importation Program proposal to import certain drugs from Canada for specific state healthcare programs. It is unclear how this and Florida’s similar program, approved by the FDA in 2024, will be implemented and whether they will overcome potential legal, regulatory, or industry challenges in the United States and/or Canada. Legally mandated price controls on payment amounts by third-party payors or other restrictions could harm our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. In addition, regional healthcare authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical products and which suppliers will be included in their prescription drug and other healthcare programs. This could reduce the ultimate demand for our product candidates or put pressure on our product pricing.
Moreover, in order to obtain reimbursement for our products in some European countries, including some EU Member States, we may be required to compile additional data comparing the cost-effectiveness of our products to other available therapies. The Health Technology Assessment, or HTA, of medicinal products is becoming an increasingly common part of the pricing and reimbursement procedures in some EU Member States, including those representing the larger markets. The HTA process is the procedure to assess therapeutic, economic and societal impact of a given medicinal product in the national healthcare systems of the individual country. The outcome of an HTA will often influence the pricing and reimbursement status granted to these medicinal products by the competent authorities of individual EU Member States. The extent to which pricing and reimbursement decisions are influenced by the HTA of the specific medicinal product currently varies between EU Member States. On January 12, 20252025, Regulation No(EU) 2021/2282 on HTA entered into application through a phased implementation. The HTA Regulation initially applies to new active substances for oncology products and advanced therapy medicinal products, and will expand to orphan medicinal products in January 2028 and to all centrally authorized medicinal products by 2030. The Regulation is intended to boost cooperation among EU Member States in assessing health technologies, including new medicinal products, and establishes a framework for EU-level joint clinical assessments. The regulation permits EU Member States to use common HTA tools, methodologies, and procedures across the EU to identify promising technologies early, and continuing voluntary cooperation in other areas. Individual EU Member States will continue to be responsible for assessing non-clinical (e.g., economic, social, ethical) aspects of health technologies, and making decisions on pricing and reimbursement. As the HTA Regulation applies to orphan medicinal products from 2028, joint clinical assessments conducted at the EU level may result in adverse or delayed outcomes that negatively affect our ability to obtain or maintain favorable reimbursement status across EU Member States. If we are unable to maintain favorable pricing and reimbursement status in EU Member States for product candidates that we may successfully develop and for which we may obtain regulatory approval, any anticipated revenue from and growth prospects for those products in the EU could be negatively affected.
■the scope of rights granted under the license agreement and other interpretation-related issues; whether and the extent to which our technology and processes infringe on intellectual property of the licensor that is not subject to the licensing agreement;
■whether and the extent to which our technology and processes infringe on intellectual property of the licensor that is not subject to the licensing agreement;
As is common in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, we employ individuals who were previously employed at universities or other biopharmaceutical or pharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors.
As is common in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, we employ individuals who were previously employed at universities or other biopharmaceutical or pharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. Although no claims against us are currently pending, and although we try to ensure that our employees and consultants do not use the proprietary information or know-how of others in their work for us, we may be subject to claims that we or our employees, consultants or independent contractors have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed intellectual property, including trade secrets or other proprietary information, of a former employer or other third parties. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation or other legal proceedings relating to intellectual property claims may cause us to incur significant expenses, and could distract our technical and management personnel from their normal responsibilities. In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments, and, if securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our common stock. This type of litigation or proceeding could substantially increase our operating losses and reduce our resources available for development activities. We may not have sufficient financial or other resources to adequately conduct such litigation or proceedings. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because of their substantially greater financial resources. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other intellectual property related proceedings could adversely affect our ability to compete in the marketplace.
A partPart of our strategy is to strategically evaluate and, as deemed appropriate, enter into additional strategic collaborations in the future when strategically attractive, including potentially with major biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies. We have limited capabilities for product development and do not yet have any capability for commercialization. Accordingly, we may enter into collaborations with other companies to provide us with important technologies and funding for our programs and technology. Other than our respective collaborations with Takeda and Hansoh for elritercept, we have no active collaborations for any of our product candidates. Our collaborations with Takeda and Hansoh and any future collaboration arrangements may not ultimately be successful, which could have a negative impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and growth prospects. We do not maintain significant rights or control of future development and commercialization activities under our collaboration with Takeda. This could lead to potential disputes in the future over the terms of the collaboration and the respective rights of the parties, and these risks and uncertainties could be present with respect to our potential future collaborations as well.
Recruiting and retaining qualified employees, consultants and advisors for our business, including scientific and technical personnel, also will be critical to our success. Competition for skilled personnel is intense and the turnover rate can be high.
Recruiting and retaining qualified employees, consultants and advisors for our business, including scientific and technical personnel, also will be critical to our success. Competition for skilled personnel is intense and the turnover rate can be high. We may not be able to attract and retain personnel on acceptable terms given the competition among numerous pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and academic institutions for skilled individuals. In addition, failure to succeed in preclinical studies, clinical trials or applications for marketing approval may make it more challenging to recruit and retain qualified personnel. The inability to recruit, or the loss of services of certain executives, key employees, consultants or advisors, may impede the progress of our research, development and commercialization objectives and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Our corporate restructuring announced in May 2025 may not result in anticipated savings, could result in total costs and expenses that are greater than expected and could disrupt our business.
On May 29, 2025, we announced the implementation of a corporate restructuring, including a reduction in force of approximately 45% of our then-current employee base across all functions, or the 2025 Restructuring. We substantially completed the 2025 Restructuring at the end of July 2025. As a result of the 2025 Restructuring, we estimated that we realize average annualized cost savings of approximately $17 million. However, these estimates are subject to several assumptions, and actual results may differ. We may not realize, in full or in part, the anticipated benefits and savings from this plan due to unforeseen difficulties, delays or unexpected costs. If we are unable to realize the expected cost savings from the announced plan, our operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected. The workforce reduction may be disruptive to our operations and could yield unanticipated consequences, such as attrition beyond planned staff reductions, increased difficulties in our day-to-day operations and reduced employee morale, as well as result in weaknesses in our infrastructure and operations, and may increase the risk that we become unable to comply with legal and regulatory requirements. Our workforce reductions could also harm our ability to attract and retain qualified management, scientific, clinical and/or manufacturing personnel. Any failure to attract or retain qualified personnel could prevent us from successfully developing rinvatercept or from supporting our ongoing collaborations.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had 8792 full-time employees, including 6570 employees engaged in research and development and 22 employees engaged in management or general and administrative activities. As our clinical development and commercialization plans and strategies develop, we expect we will need additional managerial, operational, sales, marketing, financial, legal and other personnel. Future growth would impose significant added responsibilities on members of management, including:
Outside the United States, an increasing number of laws, regulations, and industry standards govern data privacy and security. For example, the EU's General Data Protection Regulation, or EU GDPR, the United Kingdom’s GDPR, or UK GDPR (collectively referred to as the GDPR), Brazil’s General Data Protection Law (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais) (Law No. 13,709/2018), Turkey’s Personal Data Protection Law, South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Act, Taiwan’s Personal Data Protection Act, Peru’s Personal Data Protection Law, South Africa’s Protection of Personal Information Act, and China’s Personal Information Protection Law impose strict requirements for processing personal data. For example, under the GDPR, companies may face temporary or definitive bans on data processing and other corrective actions; fines of up to €20 million under the EU GDPR, 17.5 million pounds sterling under the UK GDPR, or in each case, 4% of annual global revenue, whichever is greater; or private litigation related to processing of personal data brought by classes of data subjects or consumer protection organizations authorized at law to represent their interests.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Comparison for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”
New heading “Research and Development Expenses”
New heading “General and Administrative Expenses”
New heading “Total Other Income, Net”
New heading “Income Tax (Provision) Benefit”
Largest changes
“Research and development expenses were $38.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $92.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (45)
Our lead product candidate, rinvatercept (KER-065), is designed to bind to and inhibit TGF-ß ligands, including myostatin (GDF8) and activin A, which are negative regulators of muscle and bone mass and strength. Through inhibition of these TGF-ß ligands, we believe that rinvatercept has the potential to increase skeletal muscle regeneration, increase muscle size and strength, reduce body fat, reduce fibrosis of the skeletal muscle and increase bone strength. We are developing rinvatercept for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, or DMD, and for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or ALS. Glucocorticoids, the standard of care in DMD, can have significant side effects when used long-term, including catabolism of muscle, increased fat and accelerated bone loss. In March 2025, we announced initial topline results from the Phase 1 clinical trial of rinvatercept in healthy adult male volunteers. We expecthave to initiateinitiated a Phase 2 clinical trial of rinvatercept in patients with DMD in the third quarter of 2026,DMD, and expect to announce initial data from this trial in the first half of 2027. We also plan to engage regulators on the design of a Phase 2 clinical trial of rinvatercept in patients with ALS in the second half of 2026.
Our most advanced product candidate, elritercept (KER-050), is an engineered ligand trap comprised of a modified ligand-binding domain of the TGF-ß receptor known as activin receptor type IIA, or ActRIIA, that is fused to the portion of the human antibody known as the Fc domain. Elritercept is being developed for the treatment of low blood cell counts, or cytopenias, including anemia and thrombocytopenia, in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, or MDS, and in patients with myelofibrosis. In December 2024, we entered into an exclusive license agreement with Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., or Takeda, to further develop, manufacture and commercialize elritercept worldwide outside of mainland China, Hong Kong and Macau, which became effective on January 16, 2025. Elritercept is designed to increase red blood cell and platelet production by inhibiting the signaling of a subset of the TGF-ß family of proteins to promote hematopoiesis. We believe elritercept has the potential to provide benefit to patients suffering from red blood cell and platelet differentiation and maturation defects occurring across the spectrum from early through terminal stages of hematopoiesis, and consequently may be effective for many patients that have limited treatment options or are refractory to available therapies. In July 2025, we announced that the first patient was dosed in the placebo-controlled Phase 3 RENEW clinical trial in patients with very low-, low-, or intermediate-risk MDS, which we refer to as lower-risk MDS. The dosing of the first patient triggered a $10 million milestone payment to us under the license agreement with Takeda. In July 2026, we announced that the first patient was dosed in the open-label, randomized Phase 3 ELRiSE MDS clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of elritercept versus epoetin alfa for the treatment of anemia due to very low, low, or intermediate risk MDS. The dosing of the first patient triggered a $20 million milestone payment payable to us under the license agreement with Takeda. We expect to distribute 25% of the net cash proceeds from this milestone payment to our stockholders following receipt of the payment.
Since our inception in 2015, we have devoted the majority of our efforts intoto business planning, research and development of our product candidates, including by conducting clinical trials and preclinical studies, raising capital and recruiting management and technical staff to support these operations. To date, we have not generated any revenue from product sales as none of our product candidates have been approved for commercialization. We have historically financed our operations primarily through the sale of convertible preferred stock, common stock and cash received from licensing agreements.
In December 2022, we filed a prospectus supplement to our registration statement on Form S-3ASR with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, for the issuance and sale, if any, of up to $250.0 million of shares of our common stock pursuant to a sales agreement with Leerink Partners LLC, or Leerink, as sales agent, which we refer to as the ATM Sales Agreement, under which we may offer and sell, from time to time, shares of our common stock, or the ATM Shares, through Leerink, which we refer to as the ATM Offering. In May 2024, we filed a new registration statement on Form S-3ASR, which we refer to as the New Shelf Registration Statement, to replace the prior shelf registration statement that was set to expire, including a base prospectus, which became effective immediately upon filing, under which we could issue an unspecified amount of shares of our common stock, preferred stock, debt securities and warrants. In June 2024, we filed a prospectus supplement to the New Shelf Registration Statement for the issuance and sale, if any, of up to an additional $350.0 million of shares of our common stock under the ATM Sales Agreement. As of the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, we no longer qualified as a well-known seasoned issuer and therefore were not eligible to use the New Shelf Registration Statement as an automatic shelf registration statement, and no shares were sold during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
Under the ATM Sales Agreement, Leerink may sell the ATM Shares by methods deemed to be an “at-the-market offering” as defined in Rule 415(a)(4) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We may sell the ATM Shares in amounts and at times to be determined by us from time to time subject to the terms and conditions of the ATM Sales Agreement, but we have no obligation to sell any of the ATM Shares in the ATM Offering. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we have sold a total of 4,290,096 shares of our common stock pursuant to the ATM Offering for aggregate net proceeds of approximately $228.6 million after deducting sales agent commissions and estimated offering expenses. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we may not offer and sell any ATM shares.
We have incurred recurring operating losses each fiscal year through December 31, 2024. Our net income for the year ended December 31, 2025 was primarily driven by revenue related to the Takeda Agreement. Our ability to generate product revenue sufficient to achieve profitability will depend on the successful development and commercialization of one or more of our product candidates. Our net loss was $23.7$28.7 million and $52.4 million for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $505.5$534.2 million. We expect to continue to generate operating losses and negative operating cash flows for the foreseeable future in connection with our ongoing activities. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had cash and cash equivalents of $281.5$257.6 million.
Pursuant to the terms of the Hansoh Agreement, we received a net $18.0 million upfront payment in January 2022. In addition to the upfront payment and development milestones achieved to date, we are entitled to receive up to an aggregate of (i) $23.5 million upon the achievement of specified development milestones and (ii) $144.0 million upon the achievement of specified net sales thresholds for all licensed products in the Hansoh Territory. If a licensed product is approved for marketing in the Hansoh Territory, we will be entitled to receive royalty payments based on a tiered percentage of annual net sales in each region within the Hansoh Territory, with such percentage ranging from the low double digit to high teens, subject to specified potential royalty reductions. We did not recognize any revenue related to milestones for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 or 2025.
Effective in June 2023, in connection with the Hansoh Agreement, we entered into a manufacturing technology transfer agreement, or the Tech Transfer Agreement, with Hansoh. The Tech Transfer Agreement governs the transfer to Hansoh of all documents and information required to complete the manufacturing technology transfer. Under the Tech Transfer Agreement, Hansoh is obligated to make certain payments to us, at the rates set forth in the Tech Transfer Agreement, as manufacturing technology transfer services are provided over the term of the Tech Transfer Agreement. We did not recognize any revenue during the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 20262026. We recognized zero and recognized $0.1 million of service and other revenue forduring the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.2025, respectively.
Effective in February 2024, in connection with the Hansoh Agreement, we entered into a clinical product supply agreement with Hansoh, or the Supply Agreement. We recognized zero and $0.3 million of service and other revenue during the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 20262026, comparedrespectively. toWe zerodid not recognize any revenue during the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.
Other expense, net primarily consists of unrealized and realized gains and losses on foreign currency.currency and other taxes and fees.
Income Tax (Provision) Benefit
The tax (provision) benefit has historically resulted from income tax related to taxable income generated from the Takeda Agreement. We have not recorded any income tax benefits for the losses incurred to date as it is more likely than not that these benefits will not be realized based on our history of losses and expected future losses.
Comparison for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025
The following table summarizes our results of operations for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
We recognizeddid $0.4not recognize any revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $18.2 million of service and other revenue and none for license revenue for the three months ended MarchJune 31, 2026, compared to $15.9 million of service and other revenue and $195.4 million of license revenue for the three months ended March 31,30, 2025. The decrease in total revenue of $210.9$18.2 million was primarily due to recognition of licenseservice and other revenue under the Takeda Agreement during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.
The following table summarizes our research and development expenses for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
Research and development expenses were $16.1$22.3 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $48.7$43.5 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The decrease of $32.6$21.2 million was primarily due to (i) a decrease of $18.9$15.6 million of elritercept-related expenses, primarily driven by a decrease of $10.0$11.1 million in clinical spend and a decrease of $8.9$4.5 million in manufacturing activities as activities transitioned to Takeda during 2025; (ii) a decrease of $6.2$3.8 million of cibotercept-related expenses, primarily driven by a decrease of $4.1$2.2 million in clinical spend associated with our terminated Phase 2 clinical trial and a decrease of $2.2$1.6 million in manufacturing and preclinical activities; (iii) a decrease of $7.9$7.7 million related to personnel expenses, including a decrease of $3.0$2.5 million of stock-based compensation costs, driven by a reduction in headcount; and (iv) a net decrease of $0.9 million in facilities, supplies, professional fees and other expenses. These decreases were partially offset by (a) an increase of $1.1$2.7 million of rinvatercept-related expenses, primarily driven by a netan increase of $1.5$1.6 million in clinical spend associated with our planned Phase 2 clinical trials, onetrial in patients with DMD and oneour planned Phase 2 clinical trial in patients with ALS,ALS partiallyand offsetan by a net decreaseincrease of $0.4$1.1 million in manufacturing and preclinical activities; and (b) an increase of $0.3$4.1 million in preclinical pipeline and development activities. We expect research and development expenses to fluctuate from quarter to quarter depending on the timing of clinical trial activities, clinical manufacturing and other development activities.
General and administrative expenses were $10.1$8.6 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $10.5$14.5 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The decrease of approximately $0.4$5.9 million was primarily due to (i) a net decrease of $0.3$4.3 million in professional fees, insurance, facilities, supplies and other expenses; and (ii) a decrease of $1.6 million in personnel expenses, which includes a decrease of $0.6 million in salaries and bonus, benefits and other payroll costs, partially offset by an increase of $0.3$0.7 million of stock-based compensation costs.
Total other income, net was $2.2 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $6.5$6.9 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The decrease of $4.3$4.7 million was driven by a decrease of $4.5$4.8 million in dividend income, partially offset by a decrease of $0.2 million in other expense, net.
Income Tax (Provision) Benefit
Income tax provision was zero for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $10.0an income tax benefit of $2.2 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The income tax provisionbenefit in 2025 iswas attributedattributable to taxable income generated from the Takeda Agreement.
Comparison for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025
The following table summarizes our results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
Revenue
We recognized $0.4 million of service and other revenue and zero for license revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $34.1 million of service and other revenue and $195.4 million of license revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease in total revenue of $229.0 million was primarily due to recognition of license revenue under the Takeda Agreement during the six months ended June 30, 2025.
Research and Development Expenses
The following table summarizes our research and development expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
Research and development expenses were $38.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $92.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease of $53.8 million was primarily due to (i) a decrease of $34.5 million of elritercept-related expenses, primarily driven by a decrease of $21.1 million in clinical spend and a decrease of $13.4 million in manufacturing activities as activities transitioned to Takeda during 2025; (ii) a decrease of $10.0 million of cibotercept-related expenses, primarily driven by a decrease of $6.3 million in clinical spend associated with our terminated Phase 2 clinical trial and a decrease of $3.7 million in manufacturing and preclinical activities; (iii) a decrease of $15.6 million related to personnel expenses, including a decrease of $5.5 million of stock-based compensation costs, driven by a reduction in headcount; and (iv) a net decrease of $1.8 million in facilities, supplies, professional fees and other expenses. These decreases were partially offset by (a) an increase of $3.8 million of rinvatercept-related expenses, primarily driven by an increase of $3.1 million in clinical spend associated with our Phase 2 clinical trial in patients with DMD and our planned Phase 2 clinical trial in patients with ALS, and a net increase of $0.7 million in manufacturing and preclinical activities; and (b) an increase of $4.4 million in preclinical pipeline and development activities. We expect research and development expenses to fluctuate from quarter to quarter depending on the timing of clinical trial activities, clinical manufacturing and other development activities.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses were $18.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $25.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease of approximately $6.2 million was primarily due to a (i) net decrease of $4.3 million in professional fees, insurance, facilities, supplies and other expenses; and (ii) a decrease of $1.9 million in personnel expenses, which includes a decrease of $0.4 million of stock-based compensation costs.
Total Other Income, Net
Total other income, net was $4.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $13.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease of $9.0 million was driven by a decrease of $9.3 million in dividend income, partially offset by a decrease of $0.3 million in other expense, net.
Income Tax (Provision) Benefit
Income tax provision was zero for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $7.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The income tax provision in 2025 was attributable to taxable income generated from the Takeda Agreement.
Since our inception, we have incurred significant operating losses each fiscal year through December 31, 2024. Our net loss was $23.7$52.4 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 compared to net income of $148.5$117.8 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, which was primarily driven by the one-time upfront fee related to the Takeda Agreement. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $505.5$534.2 million and $481.8 million, respectively. To date, we have devoted the majority of our efforts intoto business planning, research and development of our product candidates, including by conducting clinical trials and preclinical studies, raising capital and recruiting management and technical staff to support these operations. Our primary uses of cash are to fund operating expenses, which are primarily research and development expenditures. We expect to continue to incur substantial expenses in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we advance the preclinical studies and clinical trials of our product candidates. Furthermore, we expect to incur costs associated with operating as a public company, including significant legal, accounting, investor relations, director and officer insurance premiums and other expenses. In addition, if we obtain marketing approval for any of our product candidates, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to establishing sales, marketing, distribution and other commercial infrastructure to commercialize such products.
In December 2022, we filed a prospectus supplement to a registration statement on Form S-3ASR, including a base prospectus and sales agreement prospectus, or the Prior Shelf Registration Statement, for the issuance and sale of up to $250.0 million of shares of our common stock. On May 3, 2024, we filed a new registration statement on Form S-3ASR, or the New Shelf Registration Statement, to replace the Prior Shelf Registration Statement that was set to expire, which became automatically effective upon filing, and which permitted us to offer, from time to time, an unspecified amount of common stock, preferred stock, debt securities and warrants, including through an “at the market” program with Leerink, as sales agent, or the ATM Program. As of the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, we were no longer qualified as a well-known seasoned issuer and therefore were not eligible to use the New Shelf Registration Statement as an automatic shelf registration statement. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we have sold a total of 4,290,096 shares of our common stock pursuant to the ATM Program. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we were not eligible to offer and sell any shares of our common stock under the ATM Program and did not sell any shares during the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had cash and cash equivalents of $281.5$257.6 million. Based on our current operating assumptions, we believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to fund our projected liquidity requirements into the first half of 2028. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could use our capital resources sooner than we currently expect. Due to the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with the development of our product candidates and programs, and because the extent to which we may enter into collaborations with third parties for development of our product candidates is unknown, we are unable to estimate the timing and amounts of increased capital outlays and operating expenses associated with completing the research and development of our product candidates. Our future funding requirements, both near and long-term, will depend on many factors, including:
The following table summarizes our cash flows for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
Net cash used in operating activities was $3.5$24.0 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, which was driven by a net loss of $23.7$52.4 million and partially offset by (i) $12.9$14.8 million in net cash provided by operating assets and liabilities; and (ii) non-cash charges including $6.2$11.6 million of stock-based compensation expense, $0.6$1.3 million in lease expenses and $0.4$0.8 million in depreciation. The $12.9$14.8 million of net cash provided by operating assets and liabilities was comprised of (i) a $15.7$15.2 million decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets due to timing of expense recognition for our research and development costs; and (ii) a $3.2$3.6 million decrease in accounts receivable related to the Takeda Agreement, which was partially offset by (a) a $5.3$2.8 million decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses; and (b) a $0.6$1.2 million change in operating lease liabilities.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $161.2$131.5 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, which was driven by a (i) net income of $148.5$117.8 million; (ii) $2.9 million in net cash provided by operating assets and liabilities; and (iiiii) non-cash charges including $8.9$17.4 million of stock-based compensation expense, $0.6$1.2 million in lease expenses and $0.3$0.7 million in depreciation.depreciation; partially offset by $5.5 million in net cash used in operating assets and liabilities. The $2.9$5.5 million of net cash providedused byin operating assets and liabilities was comprised of (i) a $4.5$13.1 million decreaseincrease in accounts receivable related to the Takeda Agreement; (ii) a $0.6 million increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets due to timing of expense recognition for our research and development costs; (ii) a $3.3 million increase in deferred revenue; (iii) a $10.0 million increase in current tax liability; and (iv) a $1.6 million decrease in other long-term assets, which was partially offset by (a) a $14.5 million increase in accounts receivable related to the Takeda Agreement; (b) a $1.6$0.3 million decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses to support the advancement of our programs; and (civ) a $0.4$0.9 million change in operating lease liabilities.liabilities, which was partially offset by; (a) a $0.9 million increase in deferred revenue; (b) a $6.3 million increase in current tax liability; and (c) a $2.1 million decrease in other long-term assets.
Net cash used in investing activities was nominal for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and $0.6$0.2 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The cash used in investing activities in both periods was due to purchases of property and equipment.
Net cash used in financing activities was $2.3$5.6 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, which was primarily related to $2.3$5.7 million in cash paid for direct expenses associated with the Repurchase Agreements and the Tender Offer.Offer, partially offset by exercises of options to purchase common stock.
Net cash provided by financing activities was nominal for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025 and was related to exercises of options to purchase common stock.
We enter into agreements in the normal course of business with contract manufacturing organizations for process development, raw material purchases and manufacturing services. These contracts typically do not contain minimum purchase commitments and are generally cancellable by us upon written notice. Payments due upon cancellation consist of payments for services provided or expenses incurred, including noncancellable obligations of our service providers, up to the date of cancellation and, in the case of certain arrangements with contract manufacturing organizations, may include noncancellable fees. Under such agreements, the exact amounts owed by us in the event of termination will be based on the timing of the termination and the exact terms of the agreement. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we have committed up to approximately $6.5$7.0 million under these agreements which are expected to be paid through 2029.2028.
Refer to Note 2 in the accompanying notes to our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements. In the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, there were no newly applicable recently issued accounting pronouncements.
KROS insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 5 Form 4 filings (1 insider, 5 trade dates, 5,000 shares, about $53.4K) and open-market sales in 8 filings (7 insiders, 3 trade dates, 18,253 shares, about $191.1K; 5 of these filings say the sales were made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan). Net open-market shares: -13,253 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$137.8K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-18 | Tanini Annita |
Open-market sale | 1,224 | $10.29 | $12.6K |
| 2026-08-18 | Lerner Lorena Raquel |
Open-market sale | 3,568 | $10.29 | $36.7K |
| 2026-08-18 | Cho Esther |
Open-market sale | 4,485 | $10.29 | $46.2K |
| 2026-08-18 | Newton Charles W. |
Open-market sale |
551 | $10.30 | $5.7K |
| 2026-08-17 | Bienaime Jean Jacques |
Open-market purchase |
1,000 | $10.27 | $10.3K |
| 2026-07-15 | Bienaime Jean Jacques |
Open-market purchase |
1,000 | $10.61 | $10.6K |
| 2026-07-01 | Prener Anne |
Grant/award | 13,786 | — | — |
| 2026-06-15 | Bienaime Jean Jacques |
Open-market purchase |
1,000 | $10.19 | $10.2K |
| 2026-06-11 | Newton Charles W. |
Open-market sale |
550 | $10.04 | $5.5K |
| 2026-06-04 | Farzan Nima |
Open-market sale |
2,625 | $10.73 | $28.2K |
| 2026-06-04 | Knowles Julius |
Open-market sale |
2,625 | $10.73 | $28.2K |
| 2026-06-04 | Seth Alpna |
Open-market sale |
2,625 | $10.72 | $28.1K |
| 2026-06-03 | Seth Alpna |
Grant/award | 7,142 | — | — |
| 2026-06-03 | Knowles Julius |
Grant/award | 7,142 | — | — |
| 2026-06-03 | Gray Mary Ann |
Grant/award | 7,142 | — | — |
| 2026-06-03 | Farzan Nima |
Grant/award | 7,142 | — | — |
| 2026-06-03 | Bienaime Jean Jacques |
Grant/award | 7,142 | — | — |
| 2026-05-15 | Bienaime Jean Jacques |
Open-market purchase |
1,000 | $10.58 | $10.6K |
| 2026-04-15 | Bienaime Jean Jacques |
Open-market purchase |
1,000 | $11.70 | $11.7K |
Well-known investors holding KROS (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 967,859 | $10.4M | 0.0% | Added 138% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 396,098 | $4.2M | 0.0% | Reduced 3% |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 359,086 | $3.8M | 0.01% | Reduced 21% |
| D. E. Shaw & Co. | 2026-06-30 | 267,460 | $2.9M | 0.0% | Reduced 48% |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 246,649 | $2.6M | 0.0% | Reduced 32% |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 184,822 | $2.0M | 0.0% | Added 73% |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 10,393 | $111.2K | 0.0% | Reduced 90% |