KSS 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
KOHLS Corp · NYSE · Retail-Department Stores · CIK 885639 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Geopolitical instability, hostilities, and public health events could adversely affect consumer behavior and our operations.”
New heading “Changes in global trade policies and the imposition of tariffs could increase our costs and disrupt our supply chain.”
New heading “We are subject to income and other taxes in the United States and various local jurisdictions, and changes in tax laws or the interpretation of existing laws could increase our tax liabilities and impact our financial results.”
New heading “Evolving regulations related to ESG, climate change, and sustainability could increase our costs and impose operational restrictions.”
New heading “Our marketing and loyalty programs may be ineffective at building personalized connections with customers.”
Removed heading “Tax, trade, and climate and other ESG-related policies and regulations could change or be implemented and adversely affect our business and results of operations.”
Removed heading “Our marketing may be ineffective.”
Largest changes
see in full comparisonWe have historically relied on the public debt markets to raise capital to partially fund our operations and growth. We have also historically maintained lines of credit with financial institutions. In January 2023, we upsized and replaced our unsecured credit facility with a $1.5 billion senior secured, asset based revolving credit facility. Changes in the credit and capital markets, including market disruptions, limited liquidity, and interest rate fluctuations may increase the cost of financing or restrict our access to these potential sources of future liquidity. Our continued access to these liquidity sources on favorable terms depends on multiple factors, including our operating performance and debt ratings.During 2024, S&P downgraded our senior unsecured credit rating from BB to BB- and Moody's downgraded our rating from Ba3 to B1. These downgrades have caused our cost of borrowing toincrease,increase.andDuring 2025, Moody's further downgraded our senior unsecured credit rating from B1 to B3; however, further downgrades by Moody's do not trigger incremental interest rate increases on our existing debt. Further downgrades by S&P would cause our cost of borrowing to further increase. Declines in our credit ratings may also adversely affect our ability to access the debt markets and the terms and our cost of funds for new debt issuances. In addition, multiple further downgrades in our corporate credit rating could trigger less favorable terms under certain commercial arrangements, which could negatively impact our profitability and increase our costs. If our credit ratings were to be further downgraded, or general market conditions were to ascribe higher risk to our credit rating levels, our industry, or our Company, our access to capital and the cost of debt financing may be negatively impacted. Additionally, if unfavorable capital market conditions exist if and when we were to seek additional financing, we may not be able to raise sufficient capital on favorable terms and on a timely basis (if at all). The terms of current and future debt agreements could restrict our business operations or cause future financing to be unavailable due to our covenant restrictions then in effect.Also, if we are unable to comply with the covenants under our revolving credit facility, the lenders under that agreement will have the right to terminate their commitments thereunder and declare the outstanding loans thereunder to be immediately due and payable. A default under our revolving credit facility could trigger a cross-default, acceleration, or other consequences under other indebtedness or financial instruments to which we are a party. If our access to capital were to become significantly constrained or our cost of capital were to increase significantly our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be adversely affected.
“Uncertainty with respect to tax and trade policies, tariffs, and government regulations affecting trade between the United States and other countries has recently increased. The majority of goods we source are manufactured outside of the United States, primarily in Asia. Major developments in tax policy or trade relations, such as the imposition of tariffs on imported products, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and liquidity. …”see in full comparison
“Changes in global trade policies and the imposition of tariffs could increase our costs and disrupt our supply chain.”see in full comparison
“Tax, trade, and climate and other ESG-related policies and regulations could change or be implemented and adversely affect our business and results of operations.”see in full comparison
“Evolving regulations related to ESG, climate change, and sustainability could increase our costs and impose operational restrictions.”see in full comparison
“We have historically relied on the public debt markets and lines of credit with financial institutions to raise capital and to partially fund our operations, growth, seasonal working capital needs, and strategic initiatives. In January 2023, we upsized and replaced our unsecured credit facility with a $1.5 billion senior secured, asset based revolving credit facility. Changes in the credit and capital markets, including market disruptions, limited liquidity, and interest rate fluctuations may increase the cost of financing or restrict our access to these potential sources of future liquidity. …”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (52)
This Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” made within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as "believes," "anticipates," "plans," "may," "intends," "will," "should," "expects," and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include thecertain statements under management'sManagement's discussionDiscussion and analysis, financialAnalysis and capitalFinancial outlookand Capital Allocation Outlook and may include comments about our future sales or financial performance and our plans, performance and other objectives, expectations or intentions, such as statements regarding our liquidity, debt service requirements, planned capital expenditures, future store initiatives, and adequacy of capital resources and reserves.reserves, and the impact of macroeconomic events, including inflation, consumer behavior, and changes in global trade policies, such as tariffs, and our response to such events. Forward-looking statements are based on management’s then current views and assumptions and, as a result, are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. As such, forward-looking statements are qualified by those risk factors described below. Forward-looking statements relate to the date made, and we undertake no obligation to update them. References to past events are provided by way of example only and are not intended to be a complete listing or a representation as to whether or not such factors have occurred in the past or their likelihood of occurring in the future.
Our sales, revenues, gross margin, expenses, and operating results could be negatively impacted by a number of factors including, but not limited toto, those described below. Many of these risk factors are outside of our control. If we are not successful in managing these risks, they could have a negative impact on our sales, revenues, gross margin, expenses, and/or operating results.
GeneralOur business is highly sensitive to general economic conditions, consumer spending levels, and/or other conditionsexternal conditions, which could decline.
Our business is sensitive to the growth of the U.S. economy and the strength of the U.S. consumer. Consumer spending habits, including spendingdemand for the merchandise that we sell, are affected by manyvarious factors beyond our control, including prevailing economic conditions, inflation and measures taken to control inflation,it, consumer responses to recessionary concerns, levels of employment, salaries and wage rates, prevailing interest rates, housing costs, energy and fuel costs, income tax rates and policies, consumer confidence, consumer perception of economic conditions, and the consumer’s disposable income, credit availability, and debt levels. TheOur core moderate-income consumer, which is our core customer,customer is especially sensitive to these factors. When the cost of basic necessities, such as food, fuel, and healthcare, increases, these customers often reduce their discretionary spending, which may negatively impact our results of operations. A slowdown in the U.S. economy oreconomy, an uncertain economic outlookoutlook, or a decline in consumer confidence could adversely affect consumer spending habits.habits Asand result in lower traffic to our physical stores and digital platforms, increased markdowns, reduced sale conversion rates, and an adverse effect on our results of operations. Because all of our physical stores are located in the United States, we are especially susceptible to deteriorations in the U.S. economy.economy compared to more geographically diversified competitors.
Geopolitical instability, hostilities, and public health events could adversely affect consumer behavior and our operations.
Consumer confidence and purchasing power are influenced by the domestic and international political environment. The outbreak or escalation of war, or the occurrence of terrorist acts or other hostilities in or affecting the United States or our global supply chain partners, could lead to decreased consumer spending or widespread operational disruptions. Future pandemics or other public health crises could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Such events can result in government-mandated closures, limited operating hours, labor shortages, and severe disruptions to the retail industry and global logistics network. We cannot predict the occurrence, duration, or severity of any future public health events or the effectiveness of our mitigation strategies in response to such major disruptions.
Changes in global trade policies and the imposition of tariffs could increase our costs and disrupt our supply chain.
The majority of goods we source are manufactured outside of the United States, primarily in Asia. Consequently, our business is subject to risks associated with foreign trade, including changes in trade policy. Recent or potential impositions of new or increased tariffs on imported products, or the removal of de minimis thresholds for direct-to-consumer imports, could increase our merchandise costs and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and liquidity. On February 20, 2026, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling striking down certain tariffs previously imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ("IEEPA"). While this ruling may lead to potential refunds, the availability, timing, and amount of such refunds remain uncertain and subject to further legal and administrative developments. Following this decision, the U.S. presidential administration announced the invocation of alternative authorities to impose new tariffs on imports from various countries. If we are unable to diversify our sourcing, divert production or sourcing away from specific countries to avoid tariffs, or successfully implement pricing actions to offset these costs, our gross margins, costs of merchandise sold, results of operations, and competitive position could be adversely affected. Furthermore, retaliatory trade measures by other countries could increase the costs of our operations or limit our access to critical raw materials or merchandise.
We are subject to income and other taxes in the United States and various local jurisdictions, and changes in tax laws or the interpretation of existing laws could increase our tax liabilities and impact our financial results.
We are subject to income and other taxes in the United States and various local jurisdictions. Our effective tax rate and profitability could be adversely affected by several factors, including changes in tax laws; the interpretation of existing laws; or the results of audits or reviews by taxing authorities. We are subject to regular reviews and ongoing audits by federal, state, and local tax authorities. While we believe our tax positions and estimates are reasonable, the ultimate resolution of tax matters is often uncertain. A determination by a taxing authority that is inconsistent with our reporting positions, or a significant change in the geographic mix of our domestic operations that triggers higher state tax nexus or apportionment, could materially increase our effective tax rate. Any significant increase in our overall tax liability would reduce our net earnings and could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Evolving regulations related to ESG, climate change, and sustainability could increase our costs and impose operational restrictions.
Increased governmental focus on climate change and other ESG matters has led to complex and conflicting regulatory requirements, such as increasing state-level regulations related to the use of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in merchandise, extended producer responsibility legislation related to packaging and waste, and climate risk and greenhouse gas reporting mandates (such as those in California, which is currently partially enjoined, and the SEC climate-related disclosure rule, which is currently under federal stay) require investment in data collection and compliance infrastructure. Failure to meet these standards, or the differing expectations of our stakeholders, may directly or indirectly have a significant impact on the costs of our operations, including energy, resources used to produce our products, and compliance costs; result in sales restrictions in certain jurisdictions or regulatory fines; lead to reputational damage; and result in increased scrutiny that could heighten all of the ESG-related risks to which we are subject. Additionally, many of our suppliers may be subject to similar regulations and expectations, which may exacerbate existing risks or create new ones, including risks that may not be known to us. Any of these developments may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Consumer confidence is also affected by the domestic and international political environment. The outbreak or escalation of war, or the occurrence of terrorist acts or other hostilities in or affecting the United States, could lead to a decrease in spending by consumers.
Future pandemics could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. The impact of, and actions taken in response to COVID-19, had a significant impact on the retail industry generally and our business. Future pandemics could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Tax, trade, and climate and other ESG-related policies and regulations could change or be implemented and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Uncertainty with respect to tax and trade policies, tariffs, and government regulations affecting trade between the United States and other countries has recently increased. The majority of goods we source are manufactured outside of the United States, primarily in Asia. Major developments in tax policy or trade relations, such as the imposition of tariffs on imported products, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and liquidity. Furthermore, increased governmental focus on climate change and other ESG matters may result in complex regulatory requirements that may directly or indirectly have a significant impact on the costs of our operations, including energy, resources used to produce our products and compliance costs, which may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. While increased levels of regulation, disclosure-related and otherwise, with respect to ESG matters remain in flux under the new presidential administration, increased regulation, generally or in specific jurisdictions such as California, and increased and differing governmental and stakeholder expectations will likely lead to increased costs as well as scrutiny that could heighten all of the ESG-related risks to which we are subject. Additionally, many of our suppliers may be subject to similar regulations and expectations, which may exacerbate existing risks or create new ones, including risks that may not be known to us. Any of these developments may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Weather conditionsconditions, natural disasters, and naturalthe disasterspotential impacts of climate change could adversely affect consumer shopping patterns and disrupt our operations.
As our business includes apparel, footwear, accessories, beauty, and home products, our business is subject to risks associated with weather conditions and natural disasters, which can occur with little warning. Severe weather—including unusually heavy snow, ice, or rainstorms, and natural disasters such as earthquakes, wildfires, floods, or hurricanes—has previously resulted, and could in the future result, in physical damage to or the closure of our stores, distribution centers, or other facilities. Such events can diminish consumer demand; disrupt our supply chain, making it difficult or impossible to timely deliver seasonally appropriate merchandise; threaten the safety of our workforce and customers; and cause other operational disruptions—all of which could adversely impact our operating results.
Our business is apparel, footwear, accessories, beauty, and home products. Both our business and our supply chain are subject to weather conditions. As a result, our operating results may be adversely affected by severe or unexpected weather conditions (including those that may be caused by climate change). Frequent or unusually heavy snow, ice, or rain storms; natural disasters such as earthquakes, tornadoes, floods, fires, and hurricanes; or extended periods of unseasonable temperatures or droughts could adversely affect our supply chain or our performance by affecting consumer shopping patterns and diminishing demand for seasonal merchandise. In addition, these events could cause physical damage to our properties or impact our supply chain, making it difficult or impossible to timely deliver seasonally appropriate merchandise. Climate change may impact the frequency and/or intensity of such events, as well as contribute to various chronic changes in the physical environment. Although we maintain crisis management and disaster response plans and may take various actions to mitigate our business risks associated with such events and climate change, our mitigation strategies may be inadequate to address such a major disruption event.
Further,Furthermore, unseasonable weather conditions, including unusually warm weather in the fall or winter months or abnormally wet or cold weather in the spring or summer months, whether due to climate change or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results, as such conditions may reduce demand for seasonal merchandise and create inventory imbalances. This inconsistency between consumer spending may be inconsistent withand our typical inventory purchasing cycle.cycle may necessitate higher markdowns to clear seasonal products, which adversely affects our gross margins and profitability.
Climate change also presents widespread transition risks and long-term physical risks that are difficult to predict, including increased energy costs, greenhouse gas regulation, and threats to the habitability of specific geographic regions where we operate. Climate change may impact the frequency and/or intensity of major disruption events, as well as contribute to various changes in the physical environment. Although we maintain crisis management and disaster response plans and may take various actions to mitigate our business risks associated with such events and climate change, our mitigation strategies may be inadequate to address such a major disruption event or environmental shifts caused by climate change.
We may be unable to successfully execute anour omnichannel strategy.
Customer expectations regarding how they purchase and receive products are continuously evolving. Customers are increasingly using technology and mobile devices to rapidly compare products, check prices, and make purchases. Once products are purchased, customers are seeking alternate options for delivery of those products. To stay competitive, we must continually anticipate and adapt to these changes in consumer behavior.
Customer expectations regarding how they purchase and receive products are continuously evolving, with increasing use of technology and mobile devices to rapidly compare products, check prices, make purchases, and seek alternate delivery options. To stay competitive, we must continually anticipate and adapt to these changes in consumer behavior. The success of our omnichannel strategy depends on deliveringthe seamless integration of our physical and digital channels to deliver a seamlessfrictionless shopping experience -experience, both in-store and online. This requires maintaining uninterrupted availability of our website and supporting applications, adequate and accurate inventory levels,levels across our stores and digital platforms, timely fulfillment of customer orders, and accurate shipping of undamaged products, and integrating these efforts across our physical locations.products. Our physical stores play a crucial role in attracting customers, driving traffic to digital channels, and supporting fulfillment, returns, and other omnichannel functions. Any inability to maintain or increase store traffic or to improve sales conversion rates across both physical and digital channels could adversely affect our results of operations.
Our ability to compete with other retailers and to meet our customers' expectations may suffer if we are unable to provide relevant customer-facing technology,technology and a compelling in-storeomnichannel experience,value proposition. As consumer behavior shifts toward a value-seeking mindset, our ability to differentiate our value proposition through personalization and positiveloyalty omnichannelremains experiences.critical. AsOur we continueefforts to refine our omnichannel value strategy, our effortsstrategy may negatively impact the loyalty of certain customers and our efforts to mitigate this impact may not be successful. Additionally, declining store traffic or shifting sales from physical stores to digital platforms could lead to store closures, restructuring and other costs, and adverse effects on our financial performance.
We may be unable to offer merchandise that resonates with existing customers and attracts new customers as well aswhile successfully managemanaging our inventory levels.
Our business is dependent on our ability to anticipate fluctuations in consumer demand for a wide variety of merchandise. Failure to accurately predict constantly changing consumer tastes, preferences, spending patterns, and other lifestyle decisions, or to successfully execute our inventory allocation strategy, could result in inventory distortions that are often characterized by simultaneous lack of available stock in high-demand categories and excess inventory in others, which could create inventory imbalances and adversely affect our performance, operating results, and long-term relationships with our customers. Additionally, these distortions can lead to lost sales, additional markdowns, damaged brand reputation, and increased costs for storage and transportation.
Negative publicity surrounding us, our activities, or the products we offer, including consumer perception of our response to political and social issues, and campaigns by political activists promoting certain causes, could adversely impact our brand image and may decrease demand for our products, thereby adversely affecting our business, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
As with most retailers, we also experience inventory shrinkage due to theft or damage, and we have observed an increase in external theft incidents and organized retail crime. Higher rates of inventory shrinkage or increased security or other costs to combat inventory shrinkage could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Our efforts to contain or reduce inventory shrinkage may not be successful, and certain theft-deterrence measures could negatively impact the guest shopping experience, potentially reducing store traffic and conversion.
Our business is dependent on our ability to anticipate fluctuations in consumer demand for a wide variety of merchandise. Failure to accurately predict constantly changing consumer tastes, preferences, spending patterns, and other lifestyle decisions could create inventory imbalances and adversely affect our performance and long-term relationships with our customers. Additionally, failure to accurately predict changing consumer tastes may result in excess inventory, which could result in additional markdowns and adversely affect our operating results. Negative publicity surrounding us, our activities, or the products we offer, including consumer perception of our response to political and social issues, and campaigns by political activists promoting certain causes, could adversely impact our brand image and may decrease demand for our products, thereby adversely affecting our business, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. As with most retailers, we also experience inventory shrinkage due to theft or damage. Higher rates of inventory shrinkage or increased security or other costs to combat inventory shrinkage could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition, and our efforts to contain or reduce inventory shrinkage may not be successful.
Our marketing and loyalty programs may be ineffective at building personalized connections with customers.
Our marketing may be ineffective.
We believe that differentiating Kohl's in the marketplace is critical to our success. We design our marketing and loyalty programs to increase awarenessbrand of our brands and toawareness, build personalized connections with new and existing customers.customers, and drive traffic and conversion. We believe these programs will strengthen customer loyalty, increase the number and frequency of customers that shop our stores and website, and increase our sales. If our marketing and loyalty programs are not successful or efficient, we may fail to strengthen customer loyalty or increase shopping frequency, which could adversely affect our sales and operating results could be adversely affected.results.
The Kohl's brand and many of our private brands are powerful sales and marketing tools that depend on positive consumer and stakeholder perceptions. We devote significant resources to develop, promote, and protect private brands that generate national recognition. In some cases, the private brands or the marketing of such brands are tied to or affiliated with well-known individuals. We also associate the Kohl’s brand with third-party national brands that we sell in our store and through our partnerships with companies in pursuit of strategic initiatives. Damage to the reputation or brand image, whether or not justified, of the Kohl’s brand, our private brands, or any affiliated individuals or companies with which we have partnered can arise from various factors, including: (a) operational and product issues, such as product failures, quality issues, safety concerns, perceived deficiencies in our pricing or return policies, or litigation resulting from our business operations; (b) supply chain and social practices, including concerns regarding human rights and working conditions associated with our own operations or our vendors’ operations and perceptions of our inclusion and belonging efforts; (c) ESG and public policy perceptions, including our position, or lack of position, on environmental, social, and geopolitical or similar matters, the impact of, and perception associated with, executing and/or realizing our ESG efforts, whether positive or negative, perceptions of our management of ESG risks and opportunities, and our failure, or perceived failure, to meet evolving investor and other stakeholder expectations; and (d) various other forms of adverse publicity, especially in social media outlets.
We believe the Kohl's brand name and many of our private brand names are powerful sales and marketing tools. We devote significant resources to develop, promote, and protect private brands that generate national recognition. In some cases, the private brands or the marketing of such brands are tied to or affiliated with well-known individuals. We also associate the Kohl’s brand with third-party national brands that we sell in our store and through our partnerships with companies in pursuit of strategic initiatives. Further, we focus onOur ESG asprofile is a component of our strategy, and we have and may at times continue to engage in voluntary initiatives (such as voluntary disclosures, certifications, or goals, among others) to improve the ESG profile of our company and/or products. ForHowever, example, we publish an annual report to share information with our stakeholders, including partners, shareholders, customers, and associates, regarding our ESG progress. Thesethese disclosures reflect our goals and otherassumptions expectations and assumptions, whichthat are necessarilyinherently uncertain and which may not be realized. SuchThese initiatives may be costly, evenfail ifto realized,achieve mayintended not have the desired effect, and actionsresults, or lead to litigation or regulatory or stakeholder scrutiny. Furthermore, statements that we may take based on expectations,current assumptions,assumptions or third-party informationdata thatmay wesubsequently currently believeprove to be reasonable may subsequently be determined to be erroneousinaccurate or be subject to misinterpretation. AtStakeholder the same time, investor and other stakeholder expectations, and voluntaryexpectations and regulatory ESG disclosure standards andon policies,ESG continue to evolve and are not uniform. We may be subject to investor or regulator engagementuniform, and/or litigation on our ESG initiatives and disclosures, even if such initiatives are currently voluntary. We also note that there are divergent views regarding ESG principles in the U.S., and in particular, in U.S. state-level regulation and enforcement efforts andparticularly among certain activist stakeholders.stakeholders and state-level regulators. To the extent ESG matters negatively impact our brand and reputation, they may also impede our ability to compete as effectively to attract and retain employeesassociates or customers, which may adversely impact our operations, business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and prospects.
Furthermore, the use of online media by us, our influencer network, and our consumers and other stakeholders has increased the risk that our reputation and brand could be damaged, as the dissemination of information via online and social media is immediate and damage could arise quickly without affording us an opportunity for redress or correction. This risk is exacerbated by the rise of generative artificial intelligence and deepfake technologies, which can be used to create fictitious media content, spread misinformation, or impersonate company leadership. It may be difficult to address such negative publicity or sensationalism across media channels regardless of its accuracy, potentially causing immediate and significant harm to customer, associate, and stakeholder perceptions of our reputation and brands. This type of reputational damage may result in deterioration in our relationships with stakeholders and/or a reduction in sales, operating results, and shareholder value.
Damage to the reputations (whether or not justified) of the Kohl’s brand, our private brand names, or any affiliated individuals or companies with which we have partnered, could arise from product failures; concerns about human rights, working conditions, and other labor rights and conditions associated with our own operations or where merchandise is produced; perceptions of our inclusion and belonging efforts; perceptions regarding our position or lack of position on ESG, public policy, geopolitical and similar matters; perceptions of our pricing and return policies; litigation; vendor violations of our Terms of Engagement; perceptions of the national vendors and/or other third parties with which we partner; failure, or perceived failure, to realize our ESG goals on a timely basis or at all; the impact of, and perception associated with, executing and/or realizing our ESG and other social efforts, whether positive or negative; perceptions of our management of ESG risks and opportunities; our performance on various ESG ratings; failure to meet evolving investor and other stakeholder expectations with respect to ESG matters; or various other forms of adverse publicity, especially in social media outlets. The use of online media by us, our influencer network, and our consumers and other stakeholders has increased the risk that our reputation and brand could be damaged, as the dissemination of information via online media is immediate and damage could arise quickly without affording us an opportunity for redress or correction. This type of reputational damage may result in deterioration in our relationships with stakeholders and/or a reduction in sales, operating results, and shareholder value.
Our credit card operations facilitate merchandise sales and generate additional revenue from fees related to extending credit. The profitability of our credit card program is sensitive to the economic health of our core moderate-income customer. The private label and co-branded Kohl's credit card accounts are owned by an unrelated third-party, but we share in the net risk-adjusted revenue of the portfolio, which is defined as the sum of finance charges, late fees, and other revenue less write-offs of uncollectible accounts. Changes in funding costs related to interest rate fluctuations are shared similar to the revenue when interest rates exceed defined amounts. ThoughAlthough management currently believes that increases in funding costs will be largely offset by increases in finance charge revenue, increases in funding costscosts, including significant or rapid interest rate fluctuations, could adversely impact the profitability of our credit card operations. Additionally,Further ondeterioration Marchin 5,macroeconomic 2024,conditions, theincluding Consumerpersistent Financialinflation Protectionor Bureaurising ("CFPB")unemployment, releasedcould aincrease finalcredit rulelosses and write-offs, reducing the safenet harborrevenue dollarwe amountreceive forfrom our credit card lateprogram. feesAdditionally, consumer preference is shifting toward alternative payment methods, including “buy now, pay later” and eliminatingother thedigital automaticpayment annualmethods. inflationA adjustmentshift toaway suchfrom safeour harborbranded dollarcredit amount.products Thecould rulereduce iscustomer subject to legal challenge,loyalty and the Unitedhigher-margin Statestransactions Districtoften Courtassociated forwith the Northern Districtuse of Texas granted a preliminary injunction, staying implementation of the rule, on May 10, 2024. As of February 1, 2025, this injunction remains in effect. The ultimate outcome of this legal challenge, along with the rule’s effectiveness and implementation under the new presidential administration, remains uncertain. If implemented, this rule could adversely impact Kohl’sour credit card revenues, particularly if Kohl's steps to mitigate the impact of such rule are not successful.card.
The regulatory framework governing our private label and co-branded Kohl’s credit card program remains subject to regulatory scrutiny, and our results are sensitive to legislative or executive actions that impact credit card services. Although the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) rule limiting credit card late fees was vacated, new or re-proposed rules, including potential federal limits on credit card interest rates, could adversely affect our program’s profitability. Furthermore, new consumer protection laws or changing interpretations of existing laws may restrict our ability to extend credit to core customer segments or require us to reconfigure our credit offerings. Such developments could not only reduce program revenue but also increase the costs of our compliance and operational practices and impact our loyalty program, adversely affecting our results of operations.
Our performance is dependent on attracting and retaining a large number of quality associates, including our senior management team and other key associates, and successfully executing organizational changes, such as leadership transitions. Leadership transitions can be disruptive and may result in the loss of key personnel, changes in business direction, or difficulties in maintaining operational focus and consistency. While we have succession plans for our senior management team, they may not be adequate to replace members of our senior management, including our Chief Executive Officer, or may not be successfully executed.
The efficient operation of our business is dependent on our information systems. In particular, we rely on our information systems to effectively manage sales, distribution, and merchandise planning and allocation functions. We also generate sales through the operations of our Kohls.com website.website and the Kohl’s app. We frequently make investments that will help maintain and update our existing information systems. We also depend on third parties as it relates to our information systems. Although we and our third-party vendors seek to maintain our respective systems and address the risk of compromise of integrity, security, and consistent operation of these systems, such efforts are not always successful, and we or our third-party vendors could experience interruptions, delays, or cessation of service. The potential problems and interruptions associated with implementing technology initiatives, the failure of our information systems to perform as designed, or the failure to successfully partner with our third-party service providers, such as our cloud platform providers, could disrupt our operations, harm our sales and profitability, impair data security, and be time-consuming, costly and/or resource intensive to remedy. Additionally, certain of our business operations rely on proprietary legacy platforms that may be difficult to support, modernize, or rebuild if catastrophic issues occur. Dependence on such systems could lead to prolonged business disruptions or security vulnerabilities, which could adversely affect our results of operations and increase costs.
As part of our normal course of business, we collect, retain, process, and transmit sensitive and confidential customer, associate, and company information. We also engage third-party vendors that provide technology, systems, and services to facilitate our collection, retention, processing, and transmission of this information. We face risk that our facilities and systems and those of our third-party vendors are vulnerable to cybersecurity threats, security breaches, system failures, acts of vandalism, fraud, misappropriation, malware, ransomware, and other malicious or harmful code, misplaced or lost data, programming and/or human errors, insider threats, or other similar events. The ever-evolving and increasingly sophisticated methods of cyber-attack may be difficult or impossible to anticipate and/or detect. Our ability to monitor our vendors and service providers’ data security is limited, and, in any event, third parties may be able to circumvent those security measures, resulting in the unauthorized access to, misuse, acquisition, disclosure, loss, alteration, or destruction of our and our customers’ and associates’ data, including confidential, sensitive, and other information about individuals. Any data security incident involving the breach, misappropriation, loss, or other unauthorized disclosure of sensitive and/or confidential information, whether by us or our vendors, the failure or unavailability of technology systems, or ineffectiveness of business continuity or disaster recovery plans in the event of the foregoing events could disrupt our operations, damage our reputation and customers' willingness to shop in our stores or on our website,website or app, violate applicable laws, regulations, orders and agreements, and subject us to additional costs and liabilities which could be material. While we maintain insurance coverage designed to address certain aspects of cyber risks, such insurance coverage may be insufficient to cover all losses or all types of claims that may arise. In addition, the regulatory environment related to data privacy and cybersecurity is constantly changing, with new and increasingly demanding requirements applicable to our business. Maintaining our compliance with those requirements, including recently enacted statestate-specific consumer privacy laws, may increase our compliance costs, require changes to our business practices, limit our ability to use and collect data, impact our customers’ shopping experience, reduce our business efficiency, and subject us to additional regulatory scrutinyscrutiny, orfines, data breach litigation.litigation, or reputational damage.
Our information technology projects may not yield their intended results.results, and our use of artificial intelligence and machine learning technology presents evolving operational and legal risks.
We regularly have internal information technology projects in process. Although the technology is intended to increase productivity and operating efficiencies, these projects may not yield their intended results or may deliver an adverse user or customer experience. We may incur significant costs in connection with the implementation, ongoing use, or discontinuation of technology projects, or fail to successfully implement these technology initiatives, or achieve the anticipated efficiencies from such projects, any of which could adversely affect our operations, liquidity, and financial condition. In addition, we may not be able to adapt or adapt quickly enough to technological change, including that brought about by the use of artificial intelligence. If our competitors are more successful in adapting to such changes or otherwise incorporating such changes into their business or operations, this could have a material adverse impact on our business and results of operations.
We continue to incorporate artificial intelligence, including generative AI and machine learning technology, into our business operations and customer experiences. Challenges with properly managing the use of AI and machine learning technology could result in reputational harm, competitive disadvantage, and legal liability. The legal, regulatory, and ethical landscape around the use of AI is rapidly evolving, and our ability to timely adopt and adapt to this emerging technology in an effective and ethical manner may impact our reputation and competitiveness. The use of AI could produce results that are false, biased, or inconsistent with our values and strategies. Further, the use of generative AI tools may compromise confidential or sensitive information, jeopardize our intellectual property, or subject us to claims of intellectual property infringement, all of which could damage our reputation. Implementing AI responsibly requires significant resources to minimize unintended harmful impacts, and there can be no assurance that AI initiatives will yield intended productivity gains or beneficial results. If our AI initiatives do not yield the anticipated productivity gains or intended results, our reputation, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected. In addition, we may not be able to adapt or adapt quickly enough to technological change, including that brought about by the use of artificial intelligence. If our competitors are more successful in adapting to such changes or otherwise incorporating such changes into their business or operations, this could have a material adverse impact on our business and results of operations.
A third-party purchasing agent sources approximately 10% of the merchandise we sell. The remaining merchandise is sourced from a wide variety of domestic and international vendors. Our ability to find qualified vendors and access to brands or products in a timely and efficient manner is a significant challenge,challenge. whichOur merchandise is typicallysourced evenfrom morea difficultwide forvariety of domestic and international vendors. Substantially all goods sourced outside the United States, substantially all of whichU.S. are shipped by ocean to ports in the United States.States, making us vulnerable to port strikes, port congestion and delays, transport capacity constraints, and rising freight costs. Political or financial instability, trade restrictions, tariffs, currency exchange rates, transport capacity and costs, pandemic outbreaks, military conflicts, work stoppages, port strikes, port congestion and delays, information technology challenges, and other factors relating to foreign trade are beyond our control and have impacted or could continue to adversely impact our performance and cause us to pay more to obtain inventory or result in having the wrong inventory at the wrong time. In addition, certain laws and regulations impose import restrictions for goods, which may induce greater supply chain compliance costs and may result in delays to us or adversely impact our inventory. Where we are the importer of record, we may be subject to additional regulatory and other requirements, resulting in additional costs to us.
We may be unable to raise additional capital or maintain bank credit on favorable terms, which could adversely affectconstrain our businessoperational flexibility and financialincrease condition.our cost of doing business.
We have historically relied on the public debt markets and lines of credit with financial institutions to raise capital and to partially fund our operations, growth, seasonal working capital needs, and strategic initiatives. In January 2023, we upsized and replaced our unsecured credit facility with a $1.5 billion senior secured, asset based revolving credit facility. Changes in the credit and capital markets, including market disruptions, limited liquidity, and interest rate fluctuations may increase the cost of financing or restrict our access to these potential sources of future liquidity. Our continued access to these liquidity sources on favorable terms depends on multiple factors, including our operating performance and credit ratings.
We have historically relied on the public debt markets to raise capital to partially fund our operations and growth. We have also historically maintained lines of credit with financial institutions. In January 2023, we upsized and replaced our unsecured credit facility with a $1.5 billion senior secured, asset based revolving credit facility. Changes in the credit and capital markets, including market disruptions, limited liquidity, and interest rate fluctuations may increase the cost of financing or restrict our access to these potential sources of future liquidity. Our continued access to these liquidity sources on favorable terms depends on multiple factors, including our operating performance and debt ratings. During 2024, S&P downgraded our senior unsecured credit rating from BB to BB- and Moody's downgraded our rating from Ba3 to B1. These downgrades have caused our cost of borrowing to increase,increase. andDuring 2025, Moody's further downgraded our senior unsecured credit rating from B1 to B3; however, further downgrades by Moody's do not trigger incremental interest rate increases on our existing debt. Further downgrades by S&P would cause our cost of borrowing to further increase. Declines in our credit ratings may also adversely affect our ability to access the debt markets and the terms and our cost of funds for new debt issuances. In addition, multiple further downgrades in our corporate credit rating could trigger less favorable terms under certain commercial arrangements, which could negatively impact our profitability and increase our costs. If our credit ratings were to be further downgraded, or general market conditions were to ascribe higher risk to our credit rating levels, our industry, or our Company, our access to capital and the cost of debt financing may be negatively impacted. Additionally, if unfavorable capital market conditions exist if and when we were to seek additional financing, we may not be able to raise sufficient capital on favorable terms and on a timely basis (if at all). The terms of current and future debt agreements could restrict our business operations or cause future financing to be unavailable due to our covenant restrictions then in effect. Also, if we are unable to comply with the covenants under our revolving credit facility, the lenders under that agreement will have the right to terminate their commitments thereunder and declare the outstanding loans thereunder to be immediately due and payable. A default under our revolving credit facility could trigger a cross-default, acceleration, or other consequences under other indebtedness or financial instruments to which we are a party. If our access to capital were to become significantly constrained or our cost of capital were to increase significantly our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be adversely affected.
Our existing debt agreements, particularly our revolving credit facility, contain restrictive covenants. Any failure to comply with these covenants could result in an event of default, allowing lenders to terminate their commitments thereunder and declare the outstanding loans thereunder to be immediately due and payable. A default under our revolving credit facility could trigger a cross-default, acceleration, or other consequences under other indebtedness or financial instruments to which we are a party. If our access to capital were to become significantly constrained or our cost of capital were to increase significantly, our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be adversely affected.
Our capital allocation couldstrategy may be inefficientinefficient, may not yield the anticipated returns, or ineffective.may not effectively support our long-term growth.
Our goal is to invest capital toin maximizea ourmanner overallthat maximizes long-term returns.returns and shareholder value. This includes prioritizing spending on inventory, capital projects and expenses,expenses; managing debt levels,levels; and periodically returning value to our shareholders through dividends and, longer term, share repurchases. To a large degree, capital efficiency reflects how well we manage our other key risks. The actions taken to address other specific risks may affect how well we manage the more general risk of capital efficiency. If we do not properly allocate our capital to maximize returns, or if our investments do not deliver the expected returns within anticipated timeframes, we may fail to produce optimal financial results,results. andAdditionally, wea maymisallocation experienceof resources toward defensive measures could limit our ability to fund future growth-oriented projects, resulting in a reduction in our competitive position and shareholder value.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Inflation, Global Economic Conditions, and Trade Policies”
Largest changes
“As a result of the downgrades, the interest rate on our 3.375% notes due May 2031 will increase an additional 50 basis points in May 2025 due to the coupon adjustment provision within the note. Our credit rating was also downgraded in 2023 and 2022. This resulted in the interest rates on our 3.375% notes due May 2031 and 9.50% notes due May 2025 increasing 100 basis points in 2023 and 25 basis points in 2022. …”see in full comparison
“In the fourth quarter of 2024, S&P downgraded our senior unsecured credit rating from BB to BB- and Moody’s downgraded our rating from Ba3 to B1. As a result of the downgrades, the interest rate on our 3.375% notes due May 2031 increased an additional 50 basis points in the second quarter of 2025 due to the coupon adjustment provision within the notes. During the second quarter of 2025, Moody's downgraded our senior unsecured credit rating from B1 to B3; however, further downgrades by Moody's do not trigger incremental interest rate increases. …”see in full comparison
“We expect that our operations will continue to be influenced by general economic conditions, including food, fuel and energy prices, higher unemployment, wage inflation, and costs to source our merchandise, including tariffs. During 2025, the U.S. government utilized the IEEPA to impose additional tariffs on a broad range of imports, including certain consumer goods. While these actions did not have a material impact on our 2025 results, the global trade environment remains fluid. On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling in Learning Resources, Inc. v. …”see in full comparison
“Inflation, Global Economic Conditions, and Trade Policies”see in full comparison
Duringsee in full comparison2024,2025, Moody's downgraded our corporate credit rating from Ba3 to B2 and revised their outlook to stable, and S&P downgraded oursenior unsecuredcorporate credit rating fromBBBB- toBB-, Moody's downgraded our rating from Ba3 to B1, and Fitch downgraded our rating from BBB- to BB. Fitch revised their outlook to stable while S&P and Moody's reaffirmed their outlook at negative.B+.
“We expect that our operations will continue to be influenced by general economic conditions, including food, fuel, and energy prices, higher unemployment, wage inflation, and costs to source our merchandise, including tariffs. There can be no assurances that such factors will not impact our business in the future.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (75)
Kohl's is a leading omnichannel retailer operating 1,1751,153 stores and a website (www.Kohls.com) as of FebruaryJanuary 1,31, 2025.2026. Our Kohl's stores and website sell moderately-priced privateproprietary and national brand apparel, footwear, accessories, beauty, and home products. Our Kohl's stores generally carry a consistent merchandise assortment with some differences attributable to local preferences,preferences and store size, and Sephora shops.size. Our website includes merchandise which is available in our stores, as well as merchandise that is available only online.
Net sales decreased 7.2%,4.0%, to $15.4$14.8 billion.billion, 2023with netcomparable sales includeddown approximately $164 million from the 53rd week.3.1%.
Comparable sales, which compares the 52-week period ending February 1, 2025 versus the 52-week period ended January 27, 2024, decreased 6.5%.
Selling, general & administration ("SG&A") expenses decreased 3.7%,4.1% year-over-year, to $5.3$5.1 billion. As a percentage of total revenue, SG&A expenses were 32.7%,32.8%, an increase of 1185 basis points year-over-year.
Gain on legal settlement was $129 million from a credit card interchange fee lawsuit settlement.
Operating income was $433$624 million compared to $717$433 million in the prior year. As a percentage of total revenue, operating income was 2.7%,4.0%, aan decreaseincrease of 143135 basis points year-over-year.
On an adjusted non-GAAP basis, our adjusted operating income was $510 million compared to $509 million in the prior year.(a) As a percentage of total revenue, adjusted operating income was 3.3% compared to 3.1% in the prior year.(a) Net income was $109$272 million, or $0.98$2.38 per diluted share. This compares to net income of $317$109 million, or $2.85$0.98 per diluted share in the prior year.
On an adjusted non-GAAP basis, our adjusted net income was $186 million, or $1.62 per adjusted diluted share.(a) This compares to adjusted non-GAAP net income of $167 million, or $1.50 per adjusted diluted share.share in the prior year.(a) Operating cashCash flow provided by operating activities was $1.4 billion compared to $648 million.million in the prior year.
Long-termCurrent portion of long-term debt was reduced by $113$353 million through the voluntary redemptionrepayment of the remaining 9.50%4.25% notes due MayJuly 15,2025 2025.at maturity.
There were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility compared to $290 million in the prior year.
Long term debt increased $262 million through issuance of $360 million of 10.000% senior secured notes due 2030, partially offset by open market repurchases of $87 million of our outstanding long term debt.
Non-GAAP financial measures. Please see the “GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliation” for a reconciliation of netadjusted operating income to operating income, adjusted net income to net income, and adjusted diluted earnings per share to adjusted diluted earnings per share.
Kohl's remains committed to driving long-term shareholder value by providing our customers with great product, great value, and a great experience. To achieve this, we will offer a curatedcurated, more balanced assortment,assortment that fulfills needs across all customers, reestablish Kohl’s to beas a leader in value and quality, and enhance our omnichannel platform to deliver a frictionless experience to customers.customers across our omnichannel platforms.
Net sales: A decrease of (5%) to a decrease of (7%)
Net sales and Comparable sales: A decrease of (4%2%) to a decrease of (6%)flat
OperatingAdjusted operating margin: In the range of 2.2%2.8% to 2.6%3.4% (b)
DilutedAdjusted diluted EPS: In the range of $0.10$1.00 to $0.60$1.60 (b)
Capital Expenditures: In the range of $400 to $425 million
Capital Expenditures: Approximately $350 million to $400 million Dividend: On MarchFebruary 11,25, 2025,2026, Kohl’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend on the Company’s common stock of $0.125 per share. The dividend is payable April 2,1, 20252026 to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 21,18, 2025.2026.
(b)
Non-GAAP financial measures. The Company provides adjusted operating margin and adjusted diluted earnings per share on a non-GAAP basis and does not provide a reconciliation of the Company’s forward looking guidance to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures because of the inherent difficulty in forecasting and quantifying certain amounts that are necessary for such reconciliations.
53rd Week
The retail calendar for fiscal January 2023 included a fifth week, resulting in a 14-week fiscal fourth quarter and a 53-week year. Our comparable sales in 2024 exclude the impact of the 53rd week in 2023 and compare the 52 weeks ended February 1, 2025 and January 27, 2024.
Digital sales decreasedwere 9%approximately flat in 2024.2025 year-over-year. Digital penetration represented 29% of net sales in 2025 and 28% of net sales in 2024 and 29% of net sales in 2023.2024. We measure the change in digital sales by including all sales initiated online or through mobile applications, including omnichannel transactions which are fulfilled through our stores. We measure digital penetration as digital sales over net sales. These amounts do not take into consideration fulfillment node ornode, digital returns processed in stores.stores, and coupon behaviors.
Net sales decreased $1.2$610 billion,million, or (7.2%4.0%), to $15.4$14.8 billion for 2024.2025.
The decrease was driven by an approximately 3%4% decrease in average transaction value as well as a decrease of approximately 4% in transaction volume.
Sales decreased across all lines of business, except for Accessories.Accessories, Accessorieswhich increased approximately 9%2% during 2024 driven by Sephora sales increasing over 25%. Sephora sales exceeded $1.8 billion in 2024.2025.
Other revenue decreased $84 million in 2025 due to lower credit revenue, which was driven by certain credit card expenses shifting against other revenue from SG&A as we moved part of our account servicing to the third party that owns the accounts and lower sales to our Kohl's credit card customer.
Other revenue decreased $54 million in 2024 due to lower credit revenue, driven by a decrease in net sales, lower revolving credit balances, and an increase in loss rates.
As it relates to our credit business and recent regulatory developments, on March 5, 2024, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) released a final rule reducing the safe harbor dollar amount for credit card late fees and eliminating the automatic annual inflation adjustment to such safe harbor dollar amount. The rule is subject to legal challenge, and the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas granted a preliminary injunction, staying implementation of the rule, on May 10, 2024. As of February 1, 2025, this injunction remains in effect. The ultimate outcome of this legal challenge, along with the rule’s effectiveness and implementation under the new presidential administration, remains uncertain. If implemented, this rule could adversely impact Kohl’s credit card revenues; however, we are actively pursuing various mitigation strategies should the rule become effective.
Gross margin is calculated as net sales less cost of merchandise sold. Gross margin in 20242025 was 37.2%37.5% of net sales, an increase of 5034 basis points to last year. The increase inwas grossdriven marginby strong inventory management, merchandise mix, and moderating shrink levels. Strong inventory management was driven by lowerfewer freightclearance costs and strong inventory managementmarkdowns, as our inventory decreased 7% to last year, and receipts for the year were down 5% to last year as we continue to benefit from operating with greater flexibility. This was partially offset by elevated shrink levels.8%.
The decrease in SG&A expenses was driven by lower store payroll, marketing, and distribution costs, as well as a shift of certain corporate credit card expenses to other revenue due to moving part of our account servicing to the third party that owns the accounts, partially offset by an increase in other corporate expenses. Without the shift of certain corporate credit expenses, SG&A expenses would have decreased 2.8% to last year in 2025.
The decrease in SG&A expenses was driven by strong cost discipline across the organization. In addition, as sales declined, expenses were further reduced across stores and distribution centers. Distribution costs, which exclude payroll related to online originated orders that were shipped from our stores, were $378 million for 2024 compared to $406 million for 2023.
DepreciationThe decrease in depreciation and amortization decreased in 2024,2025 was primarily driven by reducedlower capital spending in technology. This was partially offset by increased store investments, including Sephora shopsspend and queuingclosed lines.locations.
In 2025, we recognized $15 million in Impairments, store closing, and other costs. Included in this amount was $11 million of non-cash charges related to asset impairments, $10 million of severance, and $6 million of other costs primarily related to the closure of our Monroe, Ohio E-commerce Fulfillment Center. We also reversed $12 million of other exit costs initially recognized in the fourth quarter of 2024, related to the closure of our San Bernardino, California E-commerce Fulfillment Center and 27 underperforming stores due to favorable landlord negotiations.
WeIn 2024, we recognized $76 million in Impairments, store closing, and other costs related to the closure of our San Bernardino E-commerce Fulfillment Center and 27 underperforming stores in 2024.stores. Included in this amount was $43 million of fixed asset impairments, $11 million of lease Right of Use (“ROU”) asset impairments, $14 million of severance, and $26 million in other costs relating to the closure of these locations. The $26 million in other costs includes $32 million of costs offset by $6 million in cash proceeds related to lease termination agreements. Offsetting these costs were $18 million in non-cash lease gains, where upon the remeasurement, the reduction recorded to the lease liability was greater than the remaining value of the related ROU asset.
In 2025, Kohl’s entered into a settlement agreement to resolve a credit card interchange fee lawsuit in which we were a plaintiff. We recorded a gain, net of legal fees, and received cash of $129 million.
Net interest expense decreased in 2025 due to reductions in lease payments for stores closed earlier this year, a lower average outstanding balance on the revolving credit facility, a gain on extinguishment of debt related to the open market repurchases of long term debt completed in the fourth quarter of 2025, and a loss on extinguishment of debt in 2024 that was not repeated in 2025. The reductions were partially offset by interest on our newly issued 2030 notes.
Net interest expense decreased in 2024 compared to 2023 due to reduced outstanding unsecured senior debt and a lower average outstanding balance on the revolving credit facility throughout the year. Decreases in interest expense were partially offset by a $5 million loss on extinguishment of debt recognized in connection with a voluntary redemption of the remaining $113 million of outstanding 9.50% notes due May 15, 2025 completed in June 2024.
The effective tax rate for 2025 increased compared to 2024, primarily due to higher income before income taxes. The increase in 2025 resulted in a lower proportionate favorable impact from uncertain tax positions and federal tax credits when compared to the prior year.
The effective tax rate for 2024 was lower than the effective tax rate for 2023 because of the impact of favorable results from uncertain tax positions and federal tax credits relative to consolidated book net income.
In addition to reporting our financial results in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for fiscal 2024,, this Annual Report on Form 10-K contains certain non-GAAP financial results, including adjusted operating income, adjusted net incomeincome, and adjusted diluted earnings per share. These adjusted results exclude the gains, impairments, and other costs associated with the closing of 27 underperforming stores andstores, our San Bernardino, California and Monroe, Ohio E-commerce Fulfillment Center,Centers and settlement of a credit card interchange fee lawsuit, as we believe such costs and chargesitems are not representative of our normal business activity. We believe these non-GAAP measures are useful, as they are more representative of our core business, enhance comparability across reporting periods and to industry peers, and align with the measures used by management to evaluate the Company’s performance. The adjusted, non-GAAP results are provided and should be evaluated in addition to, and not as an alternative for, our results reported in accordance with GAAP. Shown belowin the following table is a reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure referenced throughout this report to the most comparable GAAP measure. No adjustments were made to our results for fiscal yearsyear 2023 and 2022 and therefore these results are not included in the table below. NetOperating income was $717 million and net income was $317 million, or $2.85 per diluted share, in 2023, and a net loss of $19 million, or ($0.15) per diluted share, in 2022.2023.
Inflation, Global Economic Conditions, and Trade Policies
We expect that our operations will continue to be influenced by general economic conditions, including food, fuel and energy prices, higher unemployment, wage inflation, and costs to source our merchandise, including tariffs. During 2025, the U.S. government utilized the IEEPA to impose additional tariffs on a broad range of imports, including certain consumer goods. While these actions did not have a material impact on our 2025 results, the global trade environment remains fluid. On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump striking down certain tariffs previously imposed under IEEPA. While this ruling may lead to potential refunds for duties paid during 2025, the availability, timing, and amount of such refunds remain uncertain and subject to further legal and administrative developments. Following this decision, the U.S. administration announced the invocation of alternative authorities, including Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, to impose new tariffs on imports. These further actions may increase merchandise costs, affect merchandise availability, and impact our operational results. We have taken proactive measures to reduce our exposure to tariffs by leveraging our diverse factory network to move production, adjusting orders based on pricing elasticity analyses, and working closely with our supplier and vendor base to proactively manage any impacts, with the goal of continuing to drive value to our customers. There can be no assurances that such factors will not impact our business in the future.
Inflation
We expect that our operations will continue to be influenced by general economic conditions, including food, fuel, and energy prices, higher unemployment, wage inflation, and costs to source our merchandise, including tariffs. There can be no assurances that such factors will not impact our business in the future.
Our capital allocation strategy is to invest to maximize our overall long-term return and maintain a strong balance sheet. We follow a disciplined approach to capital allocation based on the following priorities: first we invest in our business to drive long-term profitable growth; second we pay a quarterly dividend; third we will completecapitalize on opportunities to further reduce our debt reductionand transactions,overall leverage, when appropriate; and fourth, when appropriate, we return excess cash to shareholders through our share repurchase program.
We will continue to invest in the business, as we plan to invest approximately $400$350 to $425$400 million in 2025,2026 whichtowards includesour thestrategic investments to complete the roll out of Sephora, expansion of impulse queuing lines, omnichannel enhancements, and two new store openings.priorities. On MarchFebruary 11,25, 2025,2026, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.125 per share. The dividend will be paid on April 2,1, 20252026 to all shareholders of record at the close of business on March 21,18, 2025.2026. AlthoughIn the second quarter of 2025, we remainissued committed$360 to returning capital to shareholders, this reductionmillion in theaggregate quarterlyprincipal dividend allows for greater balance sheet flexibility. In June 2024, we completed a voluntary redemptionamount of the10.000% remainingsenior $113 million of outstanding 9.50%secured notes due May2030; 15,in 2025.addition $353 million in aggregate principal amount of our 4.25% notes matured and were repaid. In the fourth quarter of 2025, we reduced our outstanding debt by $87 million in aggregate principal through repurchases of various notes on the open market. We did not complete any share repurchases during fiscal 2024.2025.
Our period-end cash and cash equivalents balance decreasedincreased to $674 million from $134 million from $183 million in 2023.2024. Our cash and cash equivalents balance includes short-term investments of $9$555 million and $15$9 million as of January 31, 2026, and February 1, 2025, and February 3, 2024, respectively. Our investment policy is designed to preserve principal and liquidity of our short-term investments. This policy allows investments in large money market funds or in highly rated direct short-term instruments. We also place dollar limits on our investments in individual funds or instruments.
Non-GAAP financial measure. Please see the “Adjusted Free Cash Flow (Non-GAAP measure)” for a reconciliation of adjusted free cash flow to net cash provided by operating activities to adjusted free cash flow.activities.
Operating activities generated cash of $1.4 billion in 2025 compared to $648 million in 2024 compared to $1.2 billion in 2023.2024. Operating cash flow decreasedincreased due to a lowerhigher net incomeincome, partially driven by a $129 million gain recognized with respect to settlement of a credit card interchange fee lawsuit and inventory increasingdecreasing 2%7% to last year as we invested into private brand inventory. Receipts decreased 5% in 2024 compared to aan decreaseincrease of 9%2% in 2023 due to the private brand investment.2024.
Net cash used in investing activities decreased $95$134 million to $467$333 million in 2024.2025. The decrease was primarily driven by lower capital spend during the year on the expansion of our E-commerce Fulfillment center in Etna, Ohio, which was completed in 2025, and fewer Sephora shop openings and other investments, consistent with our reduced capital expenditure plans for fiscal 2025. Additionally in 2025, we received $54 million in proceeds from sale of property and equipment primarily due to the sale of corporate and other properties, compared to $6 million in proceeds in 2024.
At the end of 2024,2025, we had a Sephora at Kohl's shop-in-shop ("Sephora shop") presence in over 1,0001,100 of our stores, including 861855 full size 2,500 square foot Sephora shops and 190294 small format Sephora shops. We also hadsubstantially 350completed locationsthe withrollout of impulse queuing lines,lines launchedacross 200our Babiesstore "R" Us shops,fleet and had sixtwo new store openings, including one relocation.openings. In 2025,2026, we anticipate capital expenditures of approximately $400$350 to $425$400 million,million whichas includes the investments to complete the roll out of Sephora, expansion of impulse queuing lines, omnichannel enhancements, and two new store openings. We willwe continue to invest in our business, including enhancing our omnichannel capabilities.
During 2024,2025, Moody's downgraded our corporate credit rating from Ba3 to B2 and revised their outlook to stable, and S&P downgraded our senior unsecuredcorporate credit rating from BBBB- to BB-, Moody's downgraded our rating from Ba3 to B1, and Fitch downgraded our rating from BBB- to BB. Fitch revised their outlook to stable while S&P and Moody's reaffirmed their outlook at negative.B+.
As of FebruaryJanuary 1,31, 2025,2026, our corporate credit ratings and outlook were as follows:
In the fourth quarter of 2024, S&P downgraded our senior unsecured credit rating from BB to BB- and Moody’s downgraded our rating from Ba3 to B1. As a result of the downgrades, the interest rate on our 3.375% notes due May 2031 increased an additional 50 basis points in the second quarter of 2025 due to the coupon adjustment provision within the notes. During the second quarter of 2025, Moody's downgraded our senior unsecured credit rating from B1 to B3; however, further downgrades by Moody's do not trigger incremental interest rate increases. In total, the interest rate on the notes due May 2031 have increased 175 basis points since their issuance due to the coupon adjustment provision within the notes.
As a result of the downgrades, the interest rate on our 3.375% notes due May 2031 will increase an additional 50 basis points in May 2025 due to the coupon adjustment provision within the note. Our credit rating was also downgraded in 2023 and 2022. This resulted in the interest rates on our 3.375% notes due May 2031 and 9.50% notes due May 2025 increasing 100 basis points in 2023 and 25 basis points in 2022. In total, the interest rates on the notes due May 2031 have increased 175 basis points since their issuance, of which 50 basis points becomes effective in May 2025, and the rates on the notes due May 2025 increased 125 basis points from their issuance to their redemption in June 2024. Each of the credit rating agencies reviews its rating periodically and there is no guarantee our current credit ratings will remain the same.
In 2024,2025, we had net$290 borrowingsmillion of $198net millionrepayments on our $1.5 billion credit facility compared to net borrowings of $7$198 million in 2023.2024. BorrowingsThere were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility, recorded as short-term debt, hadas $290of millionJanuary outstanding31, as2026. As of February 1, 2025, andthere hadwas $92$290 million asoutstanding ofunder Februarythe 3,revolving 2024.credit facility.
In the second quarter of 2024,2025, we completedissued a$360 voluntarymillion redemptionaggregate principal amount of 10.000% senior secured notes due 2030 and received proceeds of $357 million, net of the remainingdebt $113discount. millionAlso, during the second quarter of outstanding2025, 9.50% notes due May 15, 2025. In February 2023, $164$353 million in aggregate principal amount of our 3.25%4.25% notes matured and was repaid, and in December 2023, $111 million in aggregate principal amount of our 4.75% notes matured and waswere repaid.
In the fourth quarter of 2025, we reduced our outstanding debt by $87 million aggregate principal through repurchases of various notes on the open market.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
New heading “Evolving regulations related to ESG, climate change, and sustainability could increase our costs and impose operational restrictions.”
Largest changes
“Evolving regulations related to ESG, climate change, and sustainability could increase our costs and impose operational restrictions.”see in full comparison
“Increased governmental focus on climate change and other ESG matters has led to complex and conflicting regulatory requirements, such as increasing state-level regulations related to the use of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in merchandise, extended producer responsibility legislation related to packaging and waste, and climate risk and greenhouse gas reporting mandates across federal and state jurisdictions (which remain subject to evolving administrative actions, legal challenges, judicial stays, and potential rescissions or modifications) that require investment in data collection and …”see in full comparison
The majority of goods we source are manufactured outside of the United States, primarily in Asia. Consequently, our business is subject to risks associated with foreign trade, including changes in trade policy. Recent or potential impositions of new or increased tariffs on imported products, or the removal of de minimis thresholds for direct-to-consumer imports, could increase our merchandise costs and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and liquidity.see in full comparisonOn February 20, 2026,Following the United States Supreme Courtissueddecisiona ruling striking down certaininvalidating tariffs previously imposed under theIEEPA.IEEPA,While this ruling haswe initiatedarefund claims and have received tariff refunds. Remaining or future refundprocess,claimsthecontinueavailability,to be subject to uncertainty, including with respect to administrative processing, legal entitlement, timing, andamountultimateof such refunds remain uncertain and subject to further legal and administrative developments.receipt. Followingthisthe Supreme Court decision, the U.S. presidential administrationinvokedtook actions to impose tariffs on imports from various countries under alternative authorities, including Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974,toalongsideimposepotentialnewactionstariffsunderonotherimportstradefrom various countries.authorities. These and other trade and tariff-related actions may be subject to legal challenge, judicial reviews, stays, or appeals, which could result in further volatility in our merchandise costs and supplychain.chain, erode or offset benefits from prior tariff recoveries, cause supply chain delays, or necessitate sourcing realignments. If we are unable to diversify our sourcing, divert production or sourcing away from specific countries to avoid tariffs, or otherwise successfully mitigate the impact of these trade policies, our gross margins, the comparability of our operating results, costs of merchandise sold, results of operations, and competitive position could be adversely affected. Furthermore, retaliatory trade measures by other countries could increase the costs of our operations or limit our access to critical raw materials or merchandise.
Changes in global tradesee in full comparisonpoliciespolicies, tariff imposition, andthetariffimposition of tariffsrecoveries could increase ourcostscosts, distort gross margin comparability, and disrupt our supply chain.
There have been no significant changes in the Risk Factors described in our 2025 Form 10-K,see in full comparisonexceptother than as set out in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 2, 2026, in Item 1A of Part II and as follows:
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, careful consideration should be taken of the risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2026, and in Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the first quarter of 2026 ended May 2, 2026. These risk factors could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and liquidity. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also have a material adverse effect on our business operations.see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (6)
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, careful consideration should be taken of the risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2026, and in Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the first quarter of 2026 ended May 2, 2026. These risk factors could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and liquidity. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also have a material adverse effect on our business operations.
There have been no significant changes in the Risk Factors described in our 2025 Form 10-K, exceptother than as set out in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 2, 2026, in Item 1A of Part II and as follows:
Changes in global trade policiespolicies, tariff imposition, and thetariff imposition of tariffsrecoveries could increase our costscosts, distort gross margin comparability, and disrupt our supply chain.
The majority of goods we source are manufactured outside of the United States, primarily in Asia. Consequently, our business is subject to risks associated with foreign trade, including changes in trade policy. Recent or potential impositions of new or increased tariffs on imported products, or the removal of de minimis thresholds for direct-to-consumer imports, could increase our merchandise costs and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and liquidity. On February 20, 2026,Following the United States Supreme Court issueddecision a ruling striking down certaininvalidating tariffs previously imposed under the IEEPA.IEEPA, While this ruling haswe initiated arefund claims and have received tariff refunds. Remaining or future refund process,claims thecontinue availability,to be subject to uncertainty, including with respect to administrative processing, legal entitlement, timing, and amountultimate of such refunds remain uncertain and subject to further legal and administrative developments.receipt. Following thisthe Supreme Court decision, the U.S. presidential administration invokedtook actions to impose tariffs on imports from various countries under alternative authorities, including Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, toalongside imposepotential newactions tariffsunder onother importstrade from various countries.authorities. These and other trade and tariff-related actions may be subject to legal challenge, judicial reviews, stays, or appeals, which could result in further volatility in our merchandise costs and supply chain.chain, erode or offset benefits from prior tariff recoveries, cause supply chain delays, or necessitate sourcing realignments. If we are unable to diversify our sourcing, divert production or sourcing away from specific countries to avoid tariffs, or otherwise successfully mitigate the impact of these trade policies, our gross margins, the comparability of our operating results, costs of merchandise sold, results of operations, and competitive position could be adversely affected. Furthermore, retaliatory trade measures by other countries could increase the costs of our operations or limit our access to critical raw materials or merchandise.
Evolving regulations related to ESG, climate change, and sustainability could increase our costs and impose operational restrictions.
Increased governmental focus on climate change and other ESG matters has led to complex and conflicting regulatory requirements, such as increasing state-level regulations related to the use of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in merchandise, extended producer responsibility legislation related to packaging and waste, and climate risk and greenhouse gas reporting mandates across federal and state jurisdictions (which remain subject to evolving administrative actions, legal challenges, judicial stays, and potential rescissions or modifications) that require investment in data collection and compliance infrastructure. Failure to meet these standards, or the differing expectations of our stakeholders, may directly or indirectly have a significant impact on the costs of our operations, including energy, resources used to produce our products, and compliance costs; result in sales restrictions in certain jurisdictions or regulatory fines; lead to reputational damage; and result in increased scrutiny that could heighten all of the ESG-related risks to which we are subject. Additionally, many of our suppliers may be subject to similar regulations and expectations, which may exacerbate existing risks or create new ones, including risks that may not be known to us. Any of these developments may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliation”
Largest changes
“In addition to reporting our financial results in accordance with U.S. GAAP, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain non-GAAP financial results, including adjusted operating income, adjusted net income, and adjusted diluted earnings per share for the prior year. …”see in full comparison
We expect that our operations will continue to be influenced by general economic conditions, including food, fuel and energy prices,see in full comparisonhigherunemploymentunemployment,levels, wage inflation, and costs to source our merchandise, including tariffs. During 2025, the U.S. government utilized the IEEPA to impose additional tariffs on a broad range of imports, including certain consumer goods.While these actions did not have a material impact on our 2025 and year-to-date 2026 results, the global trade environment remains fluid.On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump striking down certain tariffs previously imposed under IEEPA.While this ruling may lead to potential refunds for duties paid during 2025 and the first quarter of 2026, the availability, timing, and amount of such refunds remain uncertain and subject to further legal and administrative developments.Following this decision, the U.S. administration invoked Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 to impose new tariffs on imports, effective February 24, 2026.These Section 122 tariffs are currently subject to legal challenge; in May 2026,Although the U.S. Court of International Trade issued a ruling finding the Section 122 tariffsunlawful,unlawfulalthoughinthisMayruling2026,isdutycurrentlycollectionsstayedcontinuedpendingunderappeal.a judicial stay until the 150-day statutory window expired on July 24, 2026. The administration subsequently transitioned to replacement trade actions, implementing new tariffs under authorities such as Section 301. We continue to pay applicable duties under thesedutiesauthorities, while monitoring the legal developments.FurtherThe global trade environment remains fluid and further tariff-related actions may increase merchandise costs, affect merchandise availability, and impact our operational results.
“In the second quarter of 2025, we recognized $11 million of Impairments, store closing, and other costs. Included in this amount was $11 million of non-cash charges related to asset impairments, $7 million of severance, and $4 million of other costs primarily related to the closure of our Monroe, Ohio E-commerce Fulfillment Center. We also reversed $11 million of other exit costs initially recognized in the fourth quarter of 2024, related to the closure of our San Bernardino, California E-commerce Fulfillment Center and 27 underperforming stores due to favorable landlord negotiations.”see in full comparison
Gross margin is calculated as net sales less cost of merchandise sold. For thesee in full comparisonfirstsecond quarter of 2026, gross margin was39.9%43.0% of netsales,sales and 41.5% of net sales year to date 2026, an increase of4305 and 162 basis points to lastyear.year, respectively. The increase wascauseddriven bymerchandisetariffmix with increased proprietary brand penetration,refunds, partially offset byelevatedrepaymentsshippingtocostsvendorsdrivenandbyinvestments to drive value for ourdigital sales increase of 4% year over year.customers.
“Also in the second quarter of 2025, Kohl’s entered into a settlement agreement to resolve a credit card interchange fee lawsuit in which we were a plaintiff. We recorded a gain, net of legal fees, and received cash of $129 million.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (51)
For purposes of the following discussion, unless noted, all references to "the quarter” and “the second quarter” are for the three fiscal months (13 weeks) ended August 1, 2026 or August 2, 2025. References to "year to date" and "first half" are for the six fiscal months (26 weeks) ended August 1, 2026 or August 2, 2025. References to "first quarter”" are for the three fiscal months (13 weeks) ended May 2, 2026 or May 3, 2025.
This Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as "believes," "anticipates," "plans," "may," "intends," "will," "should," "expects," and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include certain statements under Management's Discussion and Analysis and may include comments about our future sales or financial performance and our plans, performance and other objectives, expectations or intentions, such as statements regarding our liquidity, debt service requirements, planned capital expenditures, future store initiatives, adequacy of capital resources and reserves, and the impact of macroeconomic events, including inflation, consumer behavior, and changes in global trade policies, such as tariffs, and our response to such events. Forward-looking statements are based on management’s then-current views and assumptions and, as a result, are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Any such forward-looking statements are qualified by the important risk factors, described in Part I Item 1A of our 2025 Form 10-K and10-K, in Part II Item 1A of thisour Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q,10-Q for the first and second quarters of 2026, or disclosed from time to time in our filings with the SEC, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements relate to the date initially made, and we undertake no obligation to update them. Certain amounts set forth below may not foot or crossfoot due to rounding.
Kohl's is a leading omnichannel retailer operating 1,151 stores and a website (www.Kohls.com) as of MayAugust 2,1, 2026. Our Kohl's stores and website sell moderately-priced proprietary and national brand apparel, footwear, accessories, beauty, and home products. Our Kohl's stores generally carry a consistent merchandise assortment with some differences attributable to local preferences and store size. Our website includes merchandise which is available in our stores, as well as merchandise that is available only online.
Key financial results for the firstsecond quarter include:
Selling, general, and administrative ("SG&A") expenses decreased 1.6%,0.9%, to $1.1$1.2 billion. As a percentage of total revenue, SG&A expenses were 36.2%,33.8%, anconsistent increasewith ofthe 15prior basis points year-over-year.year.
Operating income was $261 million compared to $279 million in the prior year. As a percentage of total revenue, operating income was 7.4%, a decrease of 45 basis points year-over-year. In the prior year, adjusted non-GAAP operating income was $161 million and 4.6% of total revenue.(a) Net income was $151 million, or $1.28 per diluted share. This compares to net income of $153 million, or $1.35 per diluted share in the prior year. In the prior year, adjusted non-GAAP net income was $64 million, or $0.56 per adjusted diluted share.(a) Inventory was $2.9 billion, a decrease of 3% year-over-year.
Operating income was $46 million compared to $60 million in the prior year. As a percentage of total revenue, operating income was 1.4%, a decrease of 41 basis points year-over-year.
Net loss was $14 million, or ($0.13) per diluted share. This compares to net loss of $15 million, or ($0.13) per diluted share in the prior year.
Inventory was $2.9 billion, a decrease of 8% year-over-year.
Operating cash flow was a$552 usemillion ofcompared $74to million.$598 million in the prior year.
Tariff refunds of approximately $150 million were received in the quarter of which approximately $100 million was recognized within gross margin.
(a)
Non-GAAP financial measures. Please see the “GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliation” for a reconciliation of adjusted operating income to operating income, adjusted net income to net income, and adjusted diluted earnings per share to diluted earnings per share.
Borrowings under revolving credit facility were $0, a decrease of $545 million year-over-year.
Kohl's remains committed to driving long-term shareholder value by providing our customers with great product, great value, and a great experience. We have three key initiatives to achieve this: we offer a curated,curated and more balanced assortment that fulfills needs acrossof all customers, we are reestablishing Kohl’s as a leader in value and quality, and we are delivering a frictionless shopping experience to customers across our omnichannel platforms.
Net sales decreased 1.7%0.9% in the firstsecond quarter of 2026 comparedand 1.2% year to thedate first quarter of 2025.2026.
The decrease in the firstsecond quarter was driven by an equal decrease in average transaction value and in transaction volume. The decrease year to date was driven by a 2% decrease in transaction volume of approximately 4%, offset by an increase in average transaction value of approximately 2%.1%.
In the firstsecond quarter,quarter Women's,and year to date 2026, Home, Accessories, and Children's net sales performed better than the total companyCompany average. Year to date 2026, Women's net sales also performed better than the total Company average.
Comparable sales decreased 1.1%.0.9% in the second quarter of 2026 and 1.0% year to date 2026. Comparable sales is a measure that highlights the performance of our stores and digital channel by measuring the change in sales for a period over the comparable, prior-year period of equivalent length. Comparable sales includes all store and digital sales, except sales from stores open less than twelve months, stores that have been closed, and stores that have been relocated where square footage has changed by more than 10%.
Digital sales increased 4.0%2.8% in the second quarter of 2026 and digital3.4% year to date 2026. Digital penetration represented 26%27% of net sales in the second quarter of 2026 and 26% year to date 2026, compared to 24%26% in the firstsecond quarter of 2025 and 25% year to date 2025. We measure the change in digital sales by including all sales initiated online or through mobile applications, including omnichannel transactions which are fulfilled through our stores. We measure digital penetration as digital sales over net sales. These amounts do not take into consideration fulfillment node, digital returns processed in stores, and coupon behaviors.
Other revenue includes revenue from credit card operations, third-party advertising on our website, unused gift cards and merchandise return cards (breakage), commissions from our third-party digital marketplace, and other non-merchandise revenue.
Other revenue decreased $15$2 million in the second quarter of 2026 and $17 million year to date 2026, due to lower revenue from our credit card operations. This was driven by lower late fees and finance charges partially offset by lower write-off activity.
Gross margin is calculated as net sales less cost of merchandise sold. For the firstsecond quarter of 2026, gross margin was 39.9%43.0% of net sales,sales and 41.5% of net sales year to date 2026, an increase of 4305 and 162 basis points to last year.year, respectively. The increase was causeddriven by merchandisetariff mix with increased proprietary brand penetration,refunds, partially offset by elevatedrepayments shippingto costsvendors drivenand byinvestments to drive value for our digital sales increase of 4% year over year.customers.
During the second quarter, SG&A expenses decreased $19$11 million, or 1.6%,0.9%, to $1.1$1.2 billion. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A was flat to last year. Year to date 2026, SG&A expenses decreased $30 million, or 1.3%, to $2.3 billion. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A deleveraged by 156 basis points. The decreasedecreases infor SG&Aboth expensesperiods waswere driven by lowerexpense savings across stores, corporate, and credit, which are included in corporate and other costs, primarily from reduced credit expenses.costs.
The decreases in depreciation and amortization in the second quarter and year to date 2026 were driven by lower capital spend.
In the second quarter of 2025, we recognized $11 million of Impairments, store closing, and other costs. Included in this amount was $11 million of non-cash charges related to asset impairments, $7 million of severance, and $4 million of other costs primarily related to the closure of our Monroe, Ohio E-commerce Fulfillment Center. We also reversed $11 million of other exit costs initially recognized in the fourth quarter of 2024, related to the closure of our San Bernardino, California E-commerce Fulfillment Center and 27 underperforming stores due to favorable landlord negotiations.
Also in the second quarter of 2025, Kohl’s entered into a settlement agreement to resolve a credit card interchange fee lawsuit in which we were a plaintiff. We recorded a gain, net of legal fees, and received cash of $129 million.
Depreciation and amortization was $174 million, relatively flat to the first quarter of 2025.
Net interest expense decreased in the first half of 2026 due to a gaingains on extinguishment of debt related to the open market repurchases of long term debt completedrecognized in thenet firstinterest quarter of 2026expense and no outstanding balance on the revolving credit facility. The reductions were partially offset by interestgains on ourextinguishment 2030of notes,debt issuedresulted infrom open market purchases of long term debt, totaling $6 million for the second quarter ofand 2025.$15 million year to date.
The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2026 was 23.3% compared to 23.8% for the second quarter of 2025. Year to date, the tax rate was 24.1% and 25.0% for 2026 and 2025, respectively.
GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliation
In addition to reporting our financial results in accordance with U.S. GAAP, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain non-GAAP financial results, including adjusted operating income, adjusted net income, and adjusted diluted earnings per share for the prior year. These adjusted results exclude the gains, impairments, other costs, and reversals associated with the closing of 27 underperforming stores, our San Bernardino, California and Monroe, Ohio E-commerce Fulfillment Centers and settlement of a credit card interchange fee lawsuit, as we believe such items are not representative of our normal business activity. We believe these non-GAAP measures are useful, as they are more representative of our core business, enhance comparability across reporting periods and to industry peers, and align with the measures used by management to evaluate the Company’s performance. The adjusted, non-GAAP results are provided and should be evaluated in addition to, and not as an alternative for, our results reported in accordance with GAAP. Shown in the following table is a reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure referenced throughout this report to the most comparable GAAP measure. No adjustments were made to our results for the first half of fiscal 2026 and therefore these results are not included in the following table. Operating income was $261 million and $307 million in the second quarter and first half of 2026. Net income was $151 million, or $1.28 per diluted share, and $137 million, or $1.18 per diluted share, in the second quarter and first half of 2026.
In both periods, the effective tax rate results in a net benefit for income taxes on a pre-tax loss. The impact of the 2026 and 2025 net unfavorable tax items, when compared to a pre-tax loss, results in decreasing the tax rate from the statutory rate.
We expect that our operations will continue to be influenced by general economic conditions, including food, fuel and energy prices, higherunemployment unemployment,levels, wage inflation, and costs to source our merchandise, including tariffs. During 2025, the U.S. government utilized the IEEPA to impose additional tariffs on a broad range of imports, including certain consumer goods. While these actions did not have a material impact on our 2025 and year-to-date 2026 results, the global trade environment remains fluid. On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump striking down certain tariffs previously imposed under IEEPA. While this ruling may lead to potential refunds for duties paid during 2025 and the first quarter of 2026, the availability, timing, and amount of such refunds remain uncertain and subject to further legal and administrative developments. Following this decision, the U.S. administration invoked Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 to impose new tariffs on imports, effective February 24, 2026. These Section 122 tariffs are currently subject to legal challenge; in May 2026,Although the U.S. Court of International Trade issued a ruling finding the Section 122 tariffs unlawful,unlawful althoughin thisMay ruling2026, isduty currentlycollections stayedcontinued pendingunder appeal.a judicial stay until the 150-day statutory window expired on July 24, 2026. The administration subsequently transitioned to replacement trade actions, implementing new tariffs under authorities such as Section 301. We continue to pay applicable duties under these dutiesauthorities, while monitoring the legal developments. FurtherThe global trade environment remains fluid and further tariff-related actions may increase merchandise costs, affect merchandise availability, and impact our operational results.
The Company paid approximately $190 million in IEEPA tariffs betweenduring Februaryfiscal 2025 and February 2026. We submitted claims seeking approximately $140$185 million in refunds of previously paid IEEPA tariffs as part of the Phase 1 and Phase 2 CAPE tariff refunds. WeAs of August 1, 2026, the Company has received approximately $150 million in refund payments. The Company’s remaining IEEPA refund claims continue to monitorbe developmentsaccounted for as gain contingencies. Uncertainty remains regarding subsequentthe administrativetiming, phasesamount forand ourultimate remainingreceipt entries.of any further refunds.
We will continue to invest in the business, as we plan to invest approximately $350 to $400 million in capital expenditures in 2026 towards our strategic priorities. On MayAugust 20,18, 2026, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.125 per share. The dividend will be paid on JuneSeptember 24,23, 20262026, to all shareholders of record at the close of business on JuneSeptember 10,9, 2026. During the firstsecond quarter of 2026, we reduced our outstanding debt by $50$63 million aggregate principal through repurchases of various notes on the open market. WeYear to date, we have reduced our outstanding debt by $113 million through repurchases. Under our existing $3 billion board authorization, we are notresuming currently planning anyour share repurchases.repurchase program with plans to buy back approximately $100 million in stock in 2026.
Our period-end Cashcash and cash equivalents balance increased to $429$821 million from $153$174 million in the firstsecond quarter of 2025. Our Cash and cash equivalents balance includes short-term investments of $273$682 million and $7$17 million as of MayAugust 2,1, 20262026, and MayAugust 3,2, 2025, respectively. Our investment policy is designed to preserve principal and liquidity of our short-term investments. This policy allows investments in large money market funds or in highly rated direct short-term instruments. We also place dollar limits on our investments in individual funds or instruments.
Operating activities usedprovided $74$478 million of cash in the first quarterhalf of 2026 compared to $92$506 million in the first quarterhalf of 2025. The decrease in cash usedprovided inby operating activities is dueprimarily todriven theby timing of payments and inventory receipts year over year.payments.
Investing activities used $84$153 million in the first quarterhalf of 2026 compared to $108$179 million in the first quarterhalf of 2025. The decrease in cash used in investing activities was primarily driven by our reduced capital expenditure plans for fiscal 2026.
During the firstsecond quarter of 2026, Moody'sS&P revisedupgraded their outlook to positive.stable.
As of MayAugust 2,1, 2026, our corporate credit ratings and outlook were as follows:
Financing activities used $87 million of cash in the first quarter of 2026 and generated $219 million of cash in the first quarter of 2025.
CashFinancing dividendactivities paymentsused were $14$178 million ($0.125of per share)cash in both the first quarterhalf of 2026 andcompared to $287 million of cash in the first quarterhalf of 2025.
Cash dividend payments were $28 million ($0.25 per share) in both the first half of 2026 and the first half of 2025.
In the first quarterhalf of 2026, we had no net activity on our $1.5 billion credit facility, compared to net borrowingsrepayments of $255$215 million in the first quarterhalf of 2025. Borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility, recorded as short-term debt, were $0 as of MayAugust 2,1, 2026, and $545$75 million as of MayAugust 3,2, 2025.
Also in the first quarterhalf of 2026, we reduced our outstanding debt by $50$113 million aggregate principal through repurchases of various notes on the open market.
In the second quarter of 2025, we issued $360 million aggregate principal amount of 10.000% senior secured notes due 2030 and received proceeds of $357 million, net of the debt discount. Also in the second quarter of 2025, $353 million in aggregate principal amount of our 4.25% notes matured and were repaid.
There was no cash used for treasury stock purchases in the first quarterhalf of 2026 or 2025. Share repurchases are discretionary in nature. The timing and amount of repurchases are based upon available cash balances, our stock price, and other factors. AsUnder our existing $3 billion board authorization, we continueare resuming our share repurchase program with plans to solidifybuy ourback balanceapproximately sheet$100 and improve our business results we will look at resuming share repurchasesmillion in thestock future.in 2026.
The increases in our working capital and current ratio are driven by decreased borrowings under the revolving credit facility, the repayment of $353 million of our 4.25% notes that matured following the first quarter of 2025, and an increase in cash and cash equivalents.
Our senior secured, asset based revolving credit facility contains customary events of default and financial, affirmative and negative covenants, including but not limited to, a springing financial covenant relating to our fixed charge coverage ratio and restrictions on indebtedness, liens, investments, asset dispositions, and restricted payments. As of MayAugust 2,1, 2026, we were in compliance with all covenants.
We have not provided any financial guarantees arising from arrangements with unconsolidated entities or persons as of MayAugust 2,1, 2026.
KSS insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 4 filings (3 insiders, 3 trade dates, 38,346 shares, about $764.5K; 4 of these filings say the sales were made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan). Net open-market shares: -38,346 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$764.5K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-24 | Dee Steven E. |
Shares withheld for tax | 15 | $18.27 | $274 |
| 2026-09-24 | Dee Steven E. |
Grant/award | 47 | — | — |
| 2026-09-23 | Villagomez Adolfo |
Grant/award | 99 | — | — |
| 2026-09-23 | Prising Jonas |
Grant/award | 103 | — | — |
| 2026-09-23 | Mitchell Robbin |
Grant/award | 185 | — | — |
| 2026-09-23 | Mitchell Robbin |
Grant/award | 88 | — | — |
| 2026-09-23 | Floyd H. Charles |
Grant/award | 88 | — | — |
| 2026-09-23 | Floyd H. Charles |
Grant/award | 137 | — | — |
| 2026-09-23 | Cosset Yael |
Grant/award | 58 | — | — |
| 2026-09-23 | Cosset Yael |
Grant/award | 100 | — | — |
| 2026-09-23 | Chaudhary Niren |
Grant/award | 55 | — | — |
| 2026-09-23 | Arlin Wendy C. |
Grant/award | 237 | — | — |
| 2026-09-23 | Arlin Wendy C. |
Grant/award | 186 | — | — |
| 2026-09-15 | Dee Steven E. |
Grant/award | 139 | — | — |
| 2026-09-15 | Dee Steven E. |
Shares withheld for tax | 2,038 | $17.17 | $35.0K |
| 2026-08-14 | Chaudhary Niren |
Grant/award | 7,548 | — | — |
| 2026-08-14 | Villagomez Adolfo |
Grant/award | 1,562 | — | — |
| 2026-08-14 | Arlin Wendy C. |
Grant/award | 8,850 | — | — |
| 2026-08-03 | Raymond Christie |
Open-market sale |
15,000 | $20.00 | $300.0K |
| 2026-08-03 | Kent Jennifer J. |
Open-market sale |
22,942 | $20.00 | $458.8K |
| 2026-07-16 | Steinmetz Mari |
Open-market sale |
53 | $17.17 | $910 |
| 2026-07-15 | Steinmetz Mari |
Grant/award |
107 | — | — |
| 2026-07-15 | Steinmetz Mari |
Shares withheld for tax |
189 | $16.43 | $3.1K |
| 2026-06-24 | Raymond Christie |
Grant/award | 84 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | Raymond Christie |
Shares withheld for tax | 40 | $17.53 | $701 |
| 2026-06-24 | Villagomez Adolfo |
Grant/award | 78 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | Schlifske John E. |
Grant/award | 187 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | Prising Jonas |
Grant/award | 92 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | Mitchell Robbin |
Grant/award | 165 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | Mitchell Robbin |
Grant/award | 78 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | Floyd H. Charles |
Grant/award | 123 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | Floyd H. Charles |
Grant/award | 78 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | Cosset Yael |
Grant/award | 51 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | Cosset Yael |
Grant/award | 89 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | Arlin Wendy C. |
Grant/award | 108 | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | Arlin Wendy C. |
Grant/award | 212 | — | — |
| 2026-06-15 | Raymond Christie |
Grant/award | 2,240 | — | — |
| 2026-06-15 | Raymond Christie |
Shares withheld for tax | 6,007 | $18.06 | $108.5K |
| 2026-05-20 | Villagomez Adolfo |
Grant/award | 11,876 | — | — |
| 2026-05-20 | Schlifske John E. |
Grant/award | 28,256 | — | — |
| 2026-05-20 | Prising Jonas |
Grant/award | 13,923 | — | — |
| 2026-05-20 | Mitchell Robbin |
Grant/award | 11,876 | — | — |
| 2026-05-20 | Floyd H. Charles |
Grant/award | 11,876 | — | — |
| 2026-05-20 | Cosset Yael |
Grant/award | 13,514 | — | — |
| 2026-05-20 | Arlin Wendy C. |
Grant/award | 16,380 | — | — |
| 2026-05-16 | Bender Michael J |
Grant/award | 17,080 | — | — |
| 2026-05-16 | Bender Michael J |
Shares withheld for tax | 210,811 | $11.77 | $2.5M |
| 2026-04-15 | Steinmetz Mari |
Open-market sale |
351 | $13.51 | $4.7K |
| 2026-04-14 | Steinmetz Mari |
Grant/award |
513 | — | — |
| 2026-04-14 | Steinmetz Mari |
Shares withheld for tax |
1,246 | $13.46 | $16.8K |
Well-known investors holding KSS (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 2,146,020 | $38.0M | 0.02% | Added 461% |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 1,765,243 | $22.8M | — | Sold out |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 906,647 | $16.1M | 0.01% | Reduced 5% |
| Gotham Asset Management (Joel Greenblatt) | 2026-06-30 | 817,068 | $14.5M | 0.03% | Reduced 24% |
| Bridgewater Associates | 2026-06-30 | 347,967 | $6.2M | 0.03% | Added 210% |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 228,910 | $4.1M | 0.0% | Reduced 82% |
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 150,285 | $2.6M | 0.0% | Reduced 42% |
| D. E. Shaw & Co. | 2026-06-30 | 124,198 | $2.2M | 0.0% | New position |