Companies › LEU

LEU 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

Centrus Energy Corp. · NYSE · Mining & Quarrying Of Nonmetallic Minerals (No Fuels) · CIK 1065059 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from Centrus Energy Corp.'s public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

20 / 11risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
2new risk-factor headings
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
1Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-02-11 (period ending 2025-12-31) with 10-K filed 2025-02-07 (period ending 2024-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

20new paragraphs
11removed paragraphs
40reworded paragraphs
13,393 → 14,247words in section

New heading “Tariffs and other changes in international trade policy could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.”

New heading “We may not be able to successfully implement our planned expansion projects in Piketon, Ohio and Oak Ridge, Tennessee, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.”

Removed heading “A small number of Class A stockholders, who also have significant holdings of the Company’s 8.25% Notes, may be motivated by interests that are not aligned with the Company’s other Class A stockholders.”

Removed heading “Changes to, or termination of, any agreements with the U.S. government, or deterioration in our relationship with the U.S. government, could adversely affect results of operations.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: tariff, sanction, russia, ukraine
“On September 8, 2025, the U.S. officially removed import tariffs on uranium as part of a broader executive order aimed at strengthening domestic supply chains and supporting strategic industries. However, there is draft legislation in the U.S. Congress designed to impose potentially significant tariffs on Russian goods. These developments are ongoing and are subject to change, including the imposition of additional tariffs and retaliatory measures by these and other countries. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: tariff
“Tariffs and other changes in international trade policy could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: investigation, china, russia
“Additionally, on April 17, 2025, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) released a notice issuing the results of its investigation into China’s dominance in the maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding sectors pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. The USTR imposed new service fees on Chinese-built vessels entering U.S. ports above certain capacity. Our shipper of Russian LEU from Russia to the U.S. uses ships manufactured in China which happen to be exempt from the new fees under this notice. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: tariff, sanction, russia

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Additional sanctionssanctions, tariffs or other measures could be imposed by the U.S. or foreign governments (including the Russian government) in the future. For example, there is draft legislation in the U.S. Congress designed to impose potentially significant tariffs on Russian goods and/or sanctions on Rosatom whichthat would effectively prohibit (again, subject to government-issued waivers) transactions with TENEX, a subsidiary of Rosatom. Since the enactment of the Import Ban Act, TENEX continued to implement the TENEX Supply Contract while we pursue waivers from the DOE. With the issuance of the Russian Decree, TENEX began to seek the necessary export licenses and has received three licenses to date. However, we do not know what actions TENEX might take in response to new sanctions or government actions, including the Russian Decree, but if it refused, or was unable or prohibited to make future deliveries, such refusal or its inability would likely affect our ability to meet our delivery obligations to our customers and would have a material adverse effect on the Company and its financial condition.
see in full comparison
New text topics: inflation, labor, competition
“In addition, expanded operations will require us to recruit, train, and retain additional employees with specialized skills. Competition for qualified personnel remains intense, and we may experience difficulties in hiring or retaining the workforce needed to support our growth. Wage inflation, labor shortages, or higher-than-expected training costs could increase our operating expenses and reduce the efficiency of new or expanded facilities.”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: fine, regulation
“•our operations are regulated by the U.S. government, including the NRC and the DOE as well as the States of Ohio and Tennessee. Recent U.S. government administrations have relied on executive orders in lieu of federal legislation to implement regulatory policy and objectives, which could exacerbate regulatory unpredictability. Further, recent U.S. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (71)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 2 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

•financial losses we incur in connection with (i) the impact of government sanctions and tariffs imposed in response to the invasion of Ukraine and/or (ii) disputes with our counterparties arising from such sanctions or mitigation efforts.

Added

•our inability to successfully perform our U.S. government contracts, including any task orders we may be awarded;

Added

•our ability to successfully implement our planned expansion projects in Piketon, Ohio and Oak Ridge, Tennessee;

Removed

•lack of assurance that we will be awarded any task orders under any of our IDIQ contracts and, if awarded, the nature, timing and amount of the task orders that may be issued under an award is uncertain; and

Added

•tariffs and other changes in internal trade policy;

Added

•significant competition from foreign governments, and limitations on our ability to compete in foreign markets;

Added

•our dependence on our largest customers and suppliers; and

Added

•lack of assurance that we will be awarded additional task orders under any of our IDIQ contracts and, if awarded, the nature, timing and amount of the task orders that may be issued under an award is uncertain.

Reworded

•significant long-term liabilitiesliabilities, including our 0% Convertible Notes and our 2.25% Convertible Notes;

Reworded

•a small number of holders of our Class A Common Stock may exert significant influence over the direction of the Company; and

Removed

•a small number of Class A stockholders, who also have significant holdings of the Company’s 8.25% Notes, may be motivated by interests that are not aligned with the Company’s other Class A stockholders; and

Added

•our operations being out of compliance with applicable regulations, including those issued by the U.S. government, including the NRC and the DOE, and the States of Ohio and Tennessee;

Added

•uncertainty arising from U.S. government administration reliance on executive orders in lieu of federal legislation to implement regulatory policy and objectives;

Removed

•our operations are regulated by the U.S. government, including the NRC and the DOE as well as the States of Ohio and Tennessee. Recent U.S. government administrations have relied on executive orders in lieu of federal legislation to implement regulatory policy and objectives, which could exacerbate regulatory unpredictability. Further, recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions have the potential to redefine the power of federal agencies to interpret and apply federal regulations, which could impact various regulatory rules affecting our business in ways that could affect our business, prospects and operations, and our financial performance positively or negatively;

Reworded

•liability related to our operations involve the use, transportation and disposal of toxic, hazardous and/or radioactive materialsmaterials, and could result inincluding liability that may arise without regard to fault or negligence; and

Added

•our certificate of incorporation gives us certain rights with respect to equity securities held (beneficially or of record) by foreign persons.

Removed

•our certificate of incorporation gives us certain rights with respect to equity securities held (beneficially or of record) by foreign persons. If levels of foreign ownership set forth in our certificate of incorporation are exceeded, we have the right, among other things, to redeem or exchange common stock held by foreign persons, and in certain cases, the applicable redemption price or exchange value may be equal to the lower of fair market value or a foreign person’s purchase price.

Reworded

The current war in Ukraine and related international or U.S. sanctionssanctions, tariffs and restrictions on tradetrade, and the Russian response thereto, could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Reworded

The current war in Ukraine has led the United States, Russia, and other countries to impose sanctions and other measures that restrict international trade. The situation is continuously changing. The Import Ban Act was enacted on May 13, 2024. This law bans imports of LEU from Russia into the U.S. beginning August 11, 2024, subject to issuance of waivers by the DOE. The DOE has granted the Company waivers allowing it to import LEU from Russia for deliveries already committed by the Company to its U.S. customers in years 2024 and 2025 and allowing the importation of LEU from Russia for processing and reexport to our foreign customers scheduled in 2025. We filed a third waiver in December 2024 to import LEU from Russia in 2026 and 2027.customers. There is no certainty that DOE will grant ourfurther waiverwaivers request andand, if granted, whether itsuch waiver would be granted in a timeframe that would meet our customers’ needs in 2026 or 2027.needs. Although the prospect that additional restrictions would be imposed remains uncertain, imports of Russian LEU continue to be permitted into the United States pursuant to the DOE waivers, subject to the RSA and a law adopted to implement the RSA. However, the U.S. ban on imports of Russian LEU, without the grant of additional timely waivers, would have a negative material impact on our business.

Reworded

On November 14, 20242024, the government of the Russian Federation passed the Russian Decree, effective through December 31, 2025,2025 (and later extended until December 31, 2027), that rescinded TENEX’s general license to export LEU to the United States or to entities registered in the United States. Accordingly, TENEX is required to obtain a specific export license from the Russian authorities in order for it to make shipments to Centrus through 2025.2027. CentrusFor haseach beenof informedour thatorders to date, TENEX has received three specific licenses to date which allow TENEX to export LEU to the U.S. for our pending orders. Centrus will use the majority of this LEU to satisfy pending orders to a single customer on a delayed basis in reliance on our contractual rights. TENEX has informed Centrus of its plan to seek additional export licenses to meet its delivery obligations under the TENEX Supply Contract for our other pending and future orders. Centrus has been informed that there is no certainty whether additional licenses will be issued by the Russian authorities andand, if issued, whether they will be issued in a timely manner or rescinded prior to the shipment taking place.

Reworded

Further, sanctionssanctions, tariffs or restrictions by the United States, Russia, or other countries on goods and services needed to make imports may directly or indirectly impact performance of the TENEX Supply Contract and our ability to transport, import, take delivery of or make payments or deliveries related to the LEU we purchase. For example, as a result of restrictions imposed by Canada on the ability of Canadian persons and entities to provide ocean transportation services to Russia, a permit is required for our shipper, a Canadian company, to transport the LEU that we procure under the TENEX Supply Contract to the United States. A Canadian permit issued to our shipper was extended to March 2027, but for so long as the sanctions remain in place, the shipper will require further extensions beyond the current validity of the permit for continued shipments of LEU imports. Furthermore, because sanctions also limit the types of non-nuclear cargo that the ocean carrier can ship to and from Russia, its overall business in Russia has been curtailed, so this reduced the number of ships it uses for transportation to and from Russia, making it more difficult for us to make timely deliveries of LEU. The adverse impact of this reduced schedule could also lead the carrier to withdraw its ships entirely from routes to or from Russia, leaving us without a carrier to transport the LEU we procure from TENEX.

Reworded

Additional sanctionssanctions, tariffs or other measures could be imposed by the U.S. or foreign governments (including the Russian government) in the future. For example, there is draft legislation in the U.S. Congress designed to impose potentially significant tariffs on Russian goods and/or sanctions on Rosatom whichthat would effectively prohibit (again, subject to government-issued waivers) transactions with TENEX, a subsidiary of Rosatom. Since the enactment of the Import Ban Act, TENEX continued to implement the TENEX Supply Contract while we pursue waivers from the DOE. With the issuance of the Russian Decree, TENEX began to seek the necessary export licenses and has received three licenses to date. However, we do not know what actions TENEX might take in response to new sanctions or government actions, including the Russian Decree, but if it refused, or was unable or prohibited to make future deliveries, such refusal or its inability would likely affect our ability to meet our delivery obligations to our customers and would have a material adverse effect on the Company and its financial condition.

Reworded

If additional measures are taken to limit the import of Russian LEU or to prohibit or limit dealings with Russian entities, including, but not limited to, TENEX or Rosatom, the Company would seek a license, waiver, or other approval from the government imposing such measures so that the Company could continue to fulfill its purchase and sales obligations using LEU delivered under the TENEX Supply Contract. There is no assurance that such a license, waiver, or approval, if sought, would be granted, or if granted, granted in a timely fashion. If a license, waiver, or approval was not granted, the Company would need to look to alternative sources of LEU to replace the LEU that it could not procure from TENEX. The Company has contracts and prospects for alternative sources that it expects toit could use to mitigate a portion of the near-term impacts. However, our alternative sources are not sufficient, or may not be available, to replace all or any of the Russian LEU the Company would be permitted to import under the RSA, and to the extent additional supply cannot be obtained, or must be obtained at a higher cost, it will have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, and competitive position.

Reworded

Accordingly, the situation at this time is evolving and, therefore, there is no assurance that future developments would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s procurement, payment, delivery, or sale of LEU, or business viability.

Reworded

•pandemics, armed conflicts (including between Russia and Ukraine, between Israel and Hamas, and between the warUnited inStates Ukraineand Venezuela), government actions and other events that disrupt supply chains, production, transportation, payments and importation of nuclear materials or other critical supplies or services;

Reworded

In the event that a health crisis prevents our employees or our contractors from working in-person at our site or,or our suppliers are unable to provide goods and services on the schedule we anticipated, the impacts on our schedule and costs could be material.

Reworded

Nearly all of the SWU and LEU that we use to fill existing contracts with customers is sourced from outside the United States, including from Russia under the TENEX Supply Contract. The Russian Decree issued by the Russian Federal thatFederation prohibits the export of LEU from Russia to the United States unless TENEX is able to secure a specific license for each shipment. Our ability to place this SWU and LEU into existing and future contracts with customers is subject to trade restrictions, sanctions, and other limitations imposed by the United States, other governments, and our customers. For example, our imports from Russia are subject to the Import Ban Act (and any waivers issued under the Import Ban Act) and U.S. quotas, while TENEX’s exports are subject to the licensing requirements of the Russian Decree. Given the quotas, restrictions, and customer limitations that limit our ability to sell SWU and LEU purchased under the TENEX Supply Agreement both in the United States and globally, there is no guarantee that we can make sufficient sales to meet our minimum purchase obligation under the TENEX Supply Agreement. (For further information refer to Part I, Item 1 - Business - Competition and Foreign Trade).

Reworded

We may be unable to sell all of the LEU we are required to purchase under supply agreements for prices that cover our costs. In addition, our potential customers may satisfy their fuel needs for the yearsquantities for which we have not obtained an import waiver through other suppliers. Either of these events could adversely affect profitability and the viability of our business.

Reworded

We may not achieve the anticipated benefits from our supply agreements. The prices we are charged under some supply agreements are determined by formulas that may not be aligned with the prevailing market prices at the time we enter into contracts with customers. As a result, the sales prices in our contracts may not cover our purchase costs, or those purchase costs may limit our ability to secure profitable sales. If we don’t receive a waiver from DOE in a timely manner to import additional material in 2026 or 2027, our potential customers for such additional material may satisfy their fuel needs for 2026 or 2027 from other suppliers before we can secure a waiver, if we are able to secure a waiver at all. Therefore, we may be unable to sell our unsold Russian material even if we receive a waiver to import such material in 2026 or 2027.

Added

Tariffs and other changes in international trade policy could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Added

There have recently been significant changes to international trade policies and tariffs affecting imports and exports. The U.S. has implemented a range of new tariffs and increases to existing tariffs, and, in response to the tariffs announced by the U.S., other countries have imposed new or increased tariffs on certain exports from the United States. There is currently significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the United States and other countries with respect to trade policies, government regulations and tariffs. We cannot predict whether, and to what extent, current tariffs will continue, or trade policies will change in the future.

Added

Additionally, on April 17, 2025, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) released a notice issuing the results of its investigation into China’s dominance in the maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding sectors pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. The USTR imposed new service fees on Chinese-built vessels entering U.S. ports above certain capacity. Our shipper of Russian LEU from Russia to the U.S. uses ships manufactured in China which happen to be exempt from the new fees under this notice. However, these fees would be significant if they were to be imposed on our shipper.

Added

On September 8, 2025, the U.S. officially removed import tariffs on uranium as part of a broader executive order aimed at strengthening domestic supply chains and supporting strategic industries. However, there is draft legislation in the U.S. Congress designed to impose potentially significant tariffs on Russian goods. These developments are ongoing and are subject to change, including the imposition of additional tariffs and retaliatory measures by these and other countries. Depending on their extent, scope and duration, these tariffs and retaliatory measures may result in increased costs for any equipment and other goods we require to operate and develop our projects in accordance with our current plans. At the same time, it is possible that these tariffs and other measures may benefit certain aspects of our business, including by increasing demand for uranium produced in the U.S. Although discussions continue regarding potential economic arrangements between certain countries, there remains significant uncertainty over the scope, impact and duration of any tariffs and retaliatory measures, and they may, among other things, adversely impact general economic conditions, including the market and demand for uranium and our business financial condition and results of operations. For further discussion of these risks and uncertainties, refer to Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors - The current war in Ukraine and related international or U.S. sanctions, tariffs, and restrictions on trade, and the Russian response thereto, could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Added

We may not be able to successfully implement our planned expansion projects in Piketon, Ohio and Oak Ridge, Tennessee, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Added

As described in further detail in Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, we are pursuing several expansion initiatives, including the expansion of the manufacturing capacity at our facility in Oak Ridge, Tennessee and a major expansion of our uranium capacity in Piketon, Ohio. ACO was awarded a $900.0 million task order from the DOE to expand its uranium enrichment facility in Piketon, Ohio, which is subject to negotiation of a definitive agreement. These projects are complex, costly, and subject to significant uncertainties. Delays, cost overruns, or operational disruptions could materially impact our ability to achieve the anticipated benefits of these initiatives. Our ability to complete expansion projects on time and within budget depends on a variety of factors, many of which are outside our control. These include challenges related to DOE funding, permitting, zoning, environmental reviews, supply chain constraints, and the availability and performance of contractors, subcontractors, and construction materials. Adverse weather, labor disputes, supply chain disruptions or delays, changing market conditions, unexpected engineering issues, or changes in regulatory requirements could further delay or disrupt construction activities.

Added

In addition, expanded operations will require us to recruit, train, and retain additional employees with specialized skills. Competition for qualified personnel remains intense, and we may experience difficulties in hiring or retaining the workforce needed to support our growth. Wage inflation, labor shortages, or higher-than-expected training costs could increase our operating expenses and reduce the efficiency of new or expanded facilities.

Added

If we are unable to complete expansion projects as planned, or within budget, or if the projects fail to deliver the expected operational or financial benefits, our growth strategy and future operations could be impaired. Any significant delays, increased costs, or operational inefficiencies could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Reworded

There is no assurance that we will be awarded anyadditional task orders under any of our IDIQ contracts and, if awarded, the nature, timing and amount of the task orders that may be issued under an award is uncertain.

Reworded

The DOE continues to pursue the availability of HALEU for the ARDP and for the advanced reactor market and the availability of domestically enriched uranium in a quantity that would be sufficient to address a supply disruption and gaps in domestic production and enrichment and issued separate RFPs for the deconversion of HALEU, the production of HALEU and domestic production of LEU. The DOE awarded ACO the HALEU Production Contract, the HALEU Deconversion Contract and the LEU Production Contract. These IDIQ contracts were awarded to multiple successful bidders, after which the awardees will compete for individual task orders. The ultimate dollar amount under each contract and the potential scale of the expansion supported will depend upon the scope of task orders that DOE may subsequently issue under each of the contracts for which we will compete. AlthoughOn weJanuary believe5, 2026, the DOE announced that weACO was awarded a $900.0 million task order to expand its uranium enrichment facility in Piketon, Ohio, to include commercial-scale production of HALEU under the HALEU Production Contract. The task order is subject to negotiation of a definitive agreement and there are wellno positioned,guarantees thereabout whether or when funding by the DOE for such expansion would be awarded. On the same date, ACO was notified that another bidder, and not ACO, was awarded a $900.0 million task order in response to a request for proposals under the LEU Production Contract. There is no assurance that we will be awarded any additional task orders under any of our contracts and, if awarded, the nature, timing and amount of the task orders that may be issued under an award is uncertain.

Reworded

Our ability to operate the HALEU enrichmentdemonstration facilitycascade wepursuant areto deployingour contract with the Department of Energy under the HALEU Operation Contract after theits completion of the contract is dependent on our ability to secure additional contracts and funding from the U.S. government or other funding sources.

Reworded

On November 30, 2022, after a competitive selection award, we signed a contract with the DOE to complete and operate the enrichment plant we commenced building in 2019. The terms of the HALEU Operation Contract hadincluded a base contract value of approximately $150.0 million in two phases through 2024. Phase 1 included an approximately $30.0 million cost-share contribution from Centrus matched by approximately $30.0 million from the DOE to finish construction, bring the cascade online, and demonstrate production of 20 kilograms of 19.75% enriched HALEU UF6 by December 31, 2023. On October 11, 2023, the Company announced that it began enrichment operations in Piketon, Ohio. On November 7, 2023, the Company announced that it made its first delivery of HALEU to the DOE, completing Phase 1 by successfully demonstrating its HALEU production process.

Added

We substantially completed Phase 2 in June 2025 by contractually delivering 900 kilograms of HALEU UF6 to the DOE. On June 17, 2025, the DOE issued an amendment to the HALEU Operation Contract that split the first three-year option period into a first option period of one year (“Option 1a”) and a second option period of two years (“Option 1b”). Additionally, the amendment acknowledges that the estimated cost associated with Option 1b is insufficient to support full performance due to known cost increases since award of the HALEU Operation Contract and indicates that the Company will need to submit a revised cost proposal for review and negotiation prior to DOE’s consideration of Option 1b. In conjunction with the amendment, the DOE exercised Option 1a and extended the period of performance to June 30, 2026.

Removed

In Phase 2, we expect to continue operating for a full year at an annual production rate of 900 kilograms of HALEU, but there is no assurance that we will produce 900 kilograms by June 2025.

Reworded

OurCentrus goal isplans to continue production and modularly scale up the facility by matching production capacity with demand as demand for HALEU grows in the commercial and/or government sectors. However, our right to continue to operate the facility16 centrifuge demonstration cascade after completion of Option 1a of Phase 23 of the HALEU Operation Contract depends on theDOE awardexercising Option 1b of onePhase 3 or moreentering follow-oninto optionsanother bycontractual arrangement with the U.S. government,government asto wellfacilitate ascontinued operation of the cascade, and continued funding for operation from the U.S. government or other sources. There is no assurance that we will be awarded such options or that such funding will be available. Further, it is uncertain whether or when demand to support the scale up of the facility will materialize. If we do not secure the necessary contracts and funding and if sufficient demand does not emerge, we may not be able to continue or expand operations at that facility and may not be able to support providing HALEU fuel for the advanced reactors under development.

Added

On January 5, 2026, the DOE announced that ACO was selected for an award of a $900.0 million task order to expand its uranium enrichment facility in Piketon, Ohio, to include commercial-scale production of HALEU and associated LEU cascades used to feed HALEU production. The potential award is subject to negotiation.

Reworded

Regarding the existing operating HALEU cascade, there is no assurance that DOE will award Centrus additional options or that the U.S. government will enter into other contracts or that additional funding will be available. Further, it is uncertain whether or when demand to support the scale up of the facility will materialize. If we do not secure additional options or contracts and funding and if sufficient demand does not emerge, we may not be able to continue operating the demonstration cascade and may not be able to support providing HALEU fuel for the advanced reactors under development If we are required to delease the facility where we are deploying the HALEU cascade under the HALEU Operation Contract and return it, along with the centrifuges and supporting equipment, to the DOE at the expiration of ourthe contract,HALEU Operation Contract, this would likely result in the termination of our NRC operating license and us laying off some or all of our Piketon workforce. On the other hand, if we are able to continue operating the facility, we would incur additional costs and liabilities associated with the facility.

Reworded

If the Company’s operation of the Piketon facility werewas terminated, there can be no assurance that we could regain use of the Piketon facility or obtain a new NRC license in the future at the Piketon site or an alternative site, in which event we would be unable to begin commercial production of HALEU. We may also incur additional costs related to reducing our workforce or closing the Piketon facility. Failure to secure U.S. government or other funding to support the continued operation of the Piketon facility, and retain our NRC license, could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition along with our plans for future growth.

Reworded

We continue to have significant long-term liabilities, including the indebtedness under our 0% Convertible Notes and 2.25% Convertible Notes, which mature in NovemberAugust 20302032 and ourNovember 8.25%2030, Notes, which mature in February 2027.respectively.

Reworded

•reducing our cash resources for payments on our 2.25% Convertible Notes and our 8.25% Notes, thereby limiting our ability to fund our operations, capital expenditures, and future business opportunities; and

Added

•requiring us to repurchase all outstanding 2.25% Convertible Notes and 0% Convertible Notes at 100% of their outstanding principal amount (plus any accrued and unpaid interest thereon) upon the occurrence of a fundamental change (as defined in the indentures governing such notes). If certain fundamental changes referred to as make-whole fundamental changes occur, the conversion rate for such notes may be increased.

Removed

•placing certain restrictions on the ability of our subsidiary, Enrichment Corp., to transfer cash and other assets to us, which could constrain our ability to pay dividends on our Common Stock or to fund our commitments or the commitments of our other subsidiaries, pursuant to the indenture governing our 8.25% Notes, subject to certain exceptions; and

Removed

•restricting our ability to engage in certain mergers or acquisitions pursuant to the indenture governing our 8.25% Notes which also require us to offer to repurchase all such outstanding notes at 101% of their outstanding principal amount in the event of certain change of control events.

Reworded

The terms of the indentureindentures governing our 8.25%0% Convertible Notes and 2.25% Convertible Notes do not restrict Centrus or any of its subsidiaries from incurring substantial additional indebtedness in the future. If we incur substantial additional indebtedness, however, the foregoing risks would intensify.

Reworded

Additional information concerning the 8.25%0% Convertible Notes and 2.25% Convertible Notes, including the terms and conditions, are described in Note 8, Debt, of the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV of this Annual Report.

Reworded

The conditional conversion feature of our 0% Convertible Notes and 2.25% Convertible Notes, if triggered, may adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

Reworded

We completed an offering of $805.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 0% Convertible Notes due 2032 in August 2025. We also completed an offering of $402.5 million in aggregate principal amount of 2.25% Convertible Notes due 2030 in November 2024. In the event the conditional conversion feature of our 0% Convertible Notes or 2.25% Convertible Notes isare triggered, holders of the 2.25% Convertible Notesnotes will be entitled to convert them at any time during specified periods at their option. If one or more holders elect to convert their 2.25% Convertible Notes,notes, we would be required to settle a portion or all of our conversion obligation through the payment of cash, which could adversely affect our liquidity. In addition, even if holders do not elect to convert their 2.25% Convertible Notes,notes, we would be required under applicable accounting rules to reclassify all or a portion of the outstanding principal of the 2.25% Convertible Notesnotes as a current rather than long-term liability, which would result in a material reduction of our net working capital.

Reworded

Conversion of our 0% Convertible Notes and 2.25% Convertible Notes may dilute the ownership interest of our stockholders or may otherwise depress the price of our common stock.

Reworded

The conversion of some or all of our 0% Convertible Notes or 2.25% Convertible Notes may dilute the ownership interests of our stockholders. Upon conversion of the notes, we will pay cash up to the aggregate principal amount of the 2.25% Convertible Notesnotes to be converted, and cash, shares of our common stock or a combination of cash and shares of our commonCommon stock,Stock, at the Company's election, in respect of the remainder. If we elect to settle our conversion obligation in a combination of cash and shares of our common stock, any sales in the public market of our common stock issuable upon such conversion could adversely affect prevailing market prices of our common stock. In addition, the existence of the 2.25% Convertible Notesnotes may encourage short selling by market participants that engage in hedging or arbitrage activity, and anticipated conversion of the 2.25% Convertible Notesnotes into shares of our common stock could depress the price of our commonCommon stock.Stock.

Reworded

Certain provisions in the indentureindentures governing the 0% Convertible Notes and 2.25% Convertible Notes may delay or prevent an otherwise beneficial takeover attempt of us.

Reworded

Certain provisions in the indentureindentures governing the 0% Convertible Notes and the 2.25% Convertible Notes may make it more difficult or expensive for a third party to acquire us. For example, the indentureindentures governing the 0% Convertible Notes and the 2.25% Convertible Notes requiresrequire us to repurchase the notes for cash upon the occurrence of a fundamental change (as defined in the indentureindentures governing the 0% Convertible Notes and the 2.25% Convertible Notes) and, in certain circumstances, to increase the conversion rate for a holder who converts their 0% Convertible Notes or 2.25% Convertible Notes in connection with a make-whole fundamental change (as defined in the indenturerespective governing the 2.25% Convertible Notesindentures). A takeover of us may trigger the requirement that we repurchase the 0% Convertible Notes or 2.25% Convertible Notes and/or increase the conversion rate, which could make it more costly for a potential acquirer to engage in such takeover. Such additional costs may have the effect of delaying or preventing a takeover of us that would otherwise be beneficial to investors.

Showing the first 60 of 71 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

40new paragraphs
22removed paragraphs
66reworded paragraphs
15,433 → 16,938words in section

New heading “Equity-Related Compensation”

New heading “Interest Expense”

New heading “Extinguishment of Long-Term Debt”

New heading “Expansion of Uranium Enrichment Capacity in Piketon, Ohio”

New heading “0% Convertible Notes”

New heading “2.25% Convertible Notes”

New heading “2025 Shelf Registration”

Removed heading “Amortization of Intangible Assets”

Removed heading “Net Income per Share”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: investigation, sanction, china, russia
“In addition to limitations targeted specifically at imports of LEU, the expanding sanctions imposed by the United States and foreign governments on the mechanisms used to make payments to Russia and to obtain services, including transportation and other services, have increased the risk that implementation of the TENEX Supply Contract may be disrupted in the future. For example, effective January 10, 2025, the U.S. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: tariff, sanction, russia, ukraine

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Published spot price indicators for SWU reached historic highs in April 2009 at $163 per SWU. In the years following the 2011 Fukushima accident in Japan, spot prices declined more than 75%, bottoming out in August 2018 at $34 per SWU. This was followed by a period of price increases, which reached $155$195 per SWU by December 31, 2023.2024. In 2024,2025, spot prices continued to increase, reaching $195$200 per SWU by December 31, 2024,2025, which surpasses the previous historic high. This represents an increase of 26%3% since the beginning of the year and 474%488% over the 2018 historic low. This surge in the SWU spot price beginning in 2022 has been driven by primarily by uncertainty created as a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, coupled with growing interest in nuclear power as a source of secure and carbon-free energy. The contemplation of the imposition of tariffs on LEU, if ultimately imposed, may put additional upward pressure on the price of SWU. For further details, refer to Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors - The current war in Ukraine and related international or U.S. sanctions, tariffs and restrictions on trade, and the Russian response thereto, could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: tariff, sanction, russia

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

The war in Ukraine has escalated tensions between Russia and the international community, and particularly the United States.community. As a result, the United States and other countries have imposed, including through the U.S.’s enactment of the Import Ban Act discussed below, and may continue imposing, additional sanctionssanctions, tariffs, and export controls against certain Russian products, services, organizations and/or individuals.individuals, and Russia passed the Russian Decree as discussed below. Such additional restrictionsrestrictions, and any Russian response thereto, could affect our ability to purchase, take delivery of, transport, or re-sell Russian uranium enrichment, engage in transactions with TENEX, or implement the TENEX Supply Contract, which would have a negative material impact on our business. Further, sanctionstariffs or restrictionssanctions by the United States, Russia or other countries may impact our ability and the cost to transport, export, import, take delivery, or make payments related to the LEU we purchase and may require us to increase purchases from non-Russian sources to the extent available. For example, due to restrictions imposed by Canada on the ability of Canadian persons and entities to provide ocean transportation services to Russia, a permit is required for our shipper, a Canadian company, to transport the LEU that we procure under the TENEX Supply Contract to the United States. A Canadian permit issued to our shipper was extended to March 2027, but for so long as the sanctions remain in place, the shipper will require further extensions beyond the current validityexpiration of the permit for continued shipments of LEU imports. In addition, on June 24, 2024, members of the EU agreed to issue a 14th sanctions package, primarily targeting the export of Russian liquid natural gas and other services. The sanctions package includes restrictions on the transportation of empty containers to Russia. Since we supply empty cylinders under the TENEX Supply Contract that are filled and returned to us, this new sanctions package may impact the transportation of LEU from Russia to the extent such export activity has a nexus to an EU member state (e.g., through a ship’s flag, nationalities of crew members, etc.). This new sanctions package does not impact our near term deliveries. We are working with our shipper to determine the extent of the impact of the new sanctions on the transportation of LEU from Russia which may ultimately require our shipper to obtain special authorizations for the shipment of empty containers to Russia if a nexus with an EU member state exists. The U.S. and Canadian governments have indicated that the EU agrees that these sanctions should not apply to these containers and are working with the EU to clarify.
see in full comparison
New text topics: investigation, tariff
“On April 15, 2025, the President of the United States signed Executive Order 14272 initiating a U.S. Department of Commerce investigation under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, to determine whether imports of processed critical minerals, including uranium, and their derivative products threaten to impair national security. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: sanction, russia, ukraine

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

There is draft legislation in the U.S. Congress designed to impose sanctions on Rosatom which would effectively prohibit (again, subject to government-issued waivers) transactions with TENEX, a subsidiary of Rosatom. Since the enactment of the Import Ban Act and through the issuance of the Russian Decree, TENEX has continued to implement the TENEX Supply Contract while we pursue waivers from the DOE, and since the issuance of the Russian Decree TENEX has sought the necessary export licenses.DOE. However, we do not know what future actions, including in response to the Russian Decree, TENEX might take. If TENEX refuses to make future deliveries or otherwise suspends deliveries for an extended period under the TENEX Supply Contract, our delivery obligations to our customers would be negatively impacted, includingwhich would have a material adverse effect on the Company. Refer to Part 1, Item 1-, Business and Item 1A -, Risk Factors, - Operational Risks and - War in Ukraine Risks, for further discussion.
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: tariff, sanction, russia

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

For further discussion of these risks and uncertainties, refer to Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors - The current war in Ukraine and related international sanctionsor U.S. sanctions, tariffs and restrictions on tradetrade, and the Russian response thereto, could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (128)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 17 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Centrus operates two business segments: (a) LEU, which supplies various components of nuclear fuel to commercial customers from our global network of suppliers, and (b) Technical Solutions, which provides advanced uranium enrichment for the nuclear industry and the U.S. government and advanced manufacturing and other technical services to government and private sector customers and advanced uranium enrichment for the nuclear industry and the U.S. government.customers.

Reworded

Published spot price indicators for SWU reached historic highs in April 2009 at $163 per SWU. In the years following the 2011 Fukushima accident in Japan, spot prices declined more than 75%, bottoming out in August 2018 at $34 per SWU. This was followed by a period of price increases, which reached $155$195 per SWU by December 31, 2023.2024. In 2024,2025, spot prices continued to increase, reaching $195$200 per SWU by December 31, 2024,2025, which surpasses the previous historic high. This represents an increase of 26%3% since the beginning of the year and 474%488% over the 2018 historic low. This surge in the SWU spot price beginning in 2022 has been driven by primarily by uncertainty created as a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, coupled with growing interest in nuclear power as a source of secure and carbon-free energy. The contemplation of the imposition of tariffs on LEU, if ultimately imposed, may put additional upward pressure on the price of SWU. For further details, refer to Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors - The current war in Ukraine and related international or U.S. sanctions, tariffs and restrictions on trade, and the Russian response thereto, could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Reworded

When Russian supply is included, the uranium enrichment segment of the global nuclear fuel market is oversupplied, but without Russian supply, the global market for uranium enrichment would be undersupplied. Further, it is not clear that there are sufficient inventories of enriched uranium in the United States to compensate for a loss of Russian supply, absent new capacity that will take a number of years to deploy. A report issued by the International Atomic Energy Agency in 2023 reported that while U.S. utilities may have enough inventory to cover one reload of their reactors, “truly strategic physical stockpiles are almost non-existent.”2 Changes in the supply-demand balance and in the competitive landscape arising from the war in Ukraine may affect pricing trends, change customer spending patterns, and create uncertainty in the uranium market. At the same time, uncertainty remains about future demand for nuclear power generation. To address such changes and uncertainty, we continue to evaluate opportunities to grow our business organically or through acquisitions and other strategic transactions.

Added

Changes in the supply-demand balance and in the competitive landscape arising from the war in Ukraine or the imposition of tariffs may affect pricing trends, change customer spending patterns, and create uncertainty in the uranium market. At the same time, uncertainty remains about future demand for nuclear power generation. To address such changes and uncertainty, we continue to evaluate opportunities to grow our business organically or through acquisitions and other strategic transactions.

Removed

2 International Atomic Energy Agency, “Global Inventories of Secondary Uranium Supplies” (IAEA-TECDOC-2030), p. 54 (2023).

Reworded

UnderThe Company’s work on HALEU began under the HALEU Demonstration Contract, Centrusexecuted was engaged bywith the DOE in 2019, to construct a cascade of 16 AC100M centrifuges in Piketon, Ohio,Ohio to demonstrate HALEU production. The DOE has funded the HALEU Demonstration Contract up to $173.0 million with a period of performance that ended November 30, 2022. Closeout activities on the HALEU Demonstration Contract are ongoing. The DOE elected to change the scope of the HALEU Demonstration Contract and moved the operational portion of the demonstration to a new, competitively-awarded contract that would provide for operations beyond the term of the existing HALEU Demonstration Contract.

Reworded

On November 10, 2022, the Company wasDOE awarded the HALEU Operation Contract andto workthe beganCompany Decemberwith 1, 2022. Thea base contract value wasof approximately $150.0 million in two phases through 2024. Phase 1 included an approximately $30.0 million cost-share contribution from Centrus matched by approximately $30.0 million from the DOE to complete construction of the cascade, begin operations and produce the initial 20 kilograms of HALEU UF6 by no later than December 31, 2023. On October 11, 2023, the Company announced that it began enrichment operations in Piketon, Ohio.UF6. On November 7, 2023, the Company announced that it made its first contractual delivery of HALEU to the DOE, completing Phase 1 by successfully demonstrating its HALEU production process. During November 2023, the Company transitioned to Phase 2 of the HALEU Operation Contract.

Reworded

During November 2023, the Company transitioned to Phase 2 of the HALEU Operation ContractContract, includeswhich continued operations and maintenance, andincluded production for a full year at an annual production rate of 900 kilograms of HALEU UF6.UF6 for one production year, as well as continued operations and maintenance of the cascade. Phase 2 included an initial contract value of approximately $90.0 million and compensation on a cost-plus-incentive-fee-basis. The DOE will ownowns the HALEU produced from the demonstration cascade and Centrus will be compensated on a cost-plus-incentive-fee basis, with an initial Phase 2 contract value of approximately $90.0 million, subject to Congressional appropriations. DOE has increased the Phase 2 contract value and related funding to $129.0 million.cascade. The HALEU Operation Contract also gives DOE the ability to exercise three optional periods to contract for up to nine additional years of production from the cascade beyond the base contract; those options are at the DOE’s sole discretion and subject to the availability of Congressional appropriations. Concurrently, pursuantPursuant to an amendment to ourthe Company’s lease for the Piketon facility, the DOE assumed all D&D liabilities arising out of the HALEU Operation Contract.

Reworded

Under the HALEU Operation Contract, DOE is contractually requiredobligated to provide the 5B Cylinders necessary to collect the output of the cascade, but ongoing supply chain challenges had created difficulties for DOE in securing enough 5B Cylinders for the entire Phase 2 production year under Phase 2. To support the DOE in mitigating the risk of further delays in delivery of 5B Cylinders, the Company received technical direction and a contract modification from the DOE to procure compliant 5B Cylinders and components while the contractual obligation to furnish compliant 5B Cylinders under the HALEU Operation Contract continues to rest with the DOE.year. During the time periods when 5B Cylinders were insufficient, the Company was not able to continue operations of the cascade, but did not produce HALEU as it did not have cylinders5B Cylinders to store the enriched uranium. Due to these delays, Centrus was unable to achieve contractual delivery of the 900 kilograms of HALEU UF6 by November 2024, which was the date set for the end of Phase 2 by November 2024.performance. On November 5, 2024, the HALEU Operation Contract was modified to extend the Phase 2 period of performance to June 30, 2025.2025, Centruswhich began to receive deliveries of additional 5B Cylinders in October 2024 and currently expects to have adequate cylinders to complete Phase 2. In accordance with the HALEU Operation Contract,allowed the Company hasto submitted several change requests for work being performed on infrastructure, facility repairs,produce and 5Bcontractually Cylinders. The additional work is being performed underdeliver the DOE’sPhase technical2 direction.production Astarget of February 7, 2025, Centrus has delivered approximately 545900 kilograms of HALEU UF6 to DOE. ForThe DOE further detailsextended referthe Phase 2 period of performance through January 31, 2026, to Itemallow 1the -Company Businessto -complete Technicaloutstanding Solutionschange -orders. GovernmentAs Contracting.of December 31, 2025, the total Phase 2 contract value and funded value is $170.1 million. The fee for the Phase 2 period of performance that was extended beyond November 30, 2024 was not definitized and is subject to negotiation.

Added

On June 17, 2025, the DOE amended the HALEU Operation Contract to divide the first three-year option period into a first option period of one year (“Option 1a”) and a second option period of two years (“Option 1b”). The amendment established a target cost and fee for Option 1a of approximately $99.3 million and $8.7 million, respectively, and a target cost and fee for Option 1b of $163.5 million and $15.2 million, respectively. The DOE exercised Option 1a and extended the period of performance to June 30, 2026. As of December 31, 2025, Option 1a is funded for the contract value of $108.2 million. Additionally, the amendment acknowledged that the estimated cost associated with Option 1b is insufficient to support full performance due to known cost increases since the award of the HALEU Operation Contract and indicated that the Company will need to submit a revised cost proposal for review and negotiation prior to DOE’s consideration of Option 1b.

Added

Under the HALEU Operation Contract, the Company has submitted several change order requests for work being performed on infrastructure, facility repairs, and 5B Cylinders. The additional work is being performed under the DOE contracting officer’s approval or contract modifications. On September 28, 2023, the DOE modified the HALEU Operation Contract to incorporate additional scope for infrastructure and facility repairs, and costs associated with 5B Cylinder refurbishment, for an estimated additional contract value of $5.8 million, without a cost-share provision. As of December 31, 2025, DOE was obligated for costs up to the contract value of $8.8 million for the additional scope work. The DOE modified the HALEU Operation Contract and increased funding in January 2026 and is now obligated for costs up to the current contract value of $9.7 million. For further details refer to Part I, Item 1, Business - Technical Solutions - Government Contracting.

Added

The DOE continues to pursue the availability of HALEU for the ARDP and for the advanced reactor market and the availability of domestically enriched uranium in a quantity that would be sufficient to address a supply disruption and gaps in domestic production and enrichment. Congress appropriated a total of approximately $3.4 billion to the DOE to jumpstart U.S. nuclear fuel production, including both LEU and HALEU enrichment. Based on this funding, the DOE issued a series of three RFPs covering HALEU production, HALEU deconversion, and LEU production. In late 2024, the DOE made initial selections under each of the RFPs. Centrus was among the awardees for all three RFPs under IDIQ structures (the HALEU Deconversion Contract, HALEU Production Contract, and the LEU Production Contract.

Added

Each of these IDIQ awards carries a $2.0 million contract minimum for each awardee and is subject to an overall contract ceiling covering all awardees. Under the IDIQ awards, the DOE can issue task orders to the awardees and then allocate available funding to those task orders. The ultimate value of the awards to Centrus, and the scale of the expansion supported, will depend upon the scope of task orders that DOE may subsequently issue to Centrus under the contracts for which the Company intends to compete. There is no assurance that we will be awarded any additional task orders under any of our contracts and, if awarded, the nature, timing and amount of the task orders that may be issued under any award.

Added

On November 6, 2024, DOE issued requests for task order proposals under each of the HALEU Production Contract and the HALEU Deconversion Contract for respective optimization studies to support DOE in establishing the commercial production of HALEU and commercial deconversion of HALEU. On January 9, 2025, we submitted our proposals in response to these requests for task order proposals. On August 14, 2025, DOE, without making any awards under the first task order proposal request, issued a second request for task order proposals under the HALEU Production Contract. The second request provided $900.0 million to support the deployment of commercial HALEU enrichment capacity. On January 5, 2026, the DOE announced that ACO was selected for award of a $900.0 million task order to expand its uranium enrichment facility in Piketon, Ohio, to include commercial-scale production of HALEU. The award also includes options, at the DOE’s discretion, for up to $170.0 million to produce and deliver HALEU to the DOE. The task order is subject to negotiation of a definitive agreement and there are no guarantees about whether or when funding by the DOE for such expansion would be awarded or whether we will successfully perform any awarded contract.

Added

On March 30, 2025, the Company submitted its proposal in response to a request for task order proposals from the DOE for a report and additional deliverables under the LEU Production Contract. On April 11, 2025, the Company was awarded a time and materials task order with a total award ceiling of approximately $0.5 million.

Removed

The DOE continues to pursue the availability of HALEU for the ARDP and for the advanced reactor market and the availability of domestically enriched uranium in a quantity that would be sufficient to address a supply disruption and gaps in domestic production and enrichment and issued separate RFPs for the deconversion of HALEU, the production of HALEU and domestic production of LEU. The DOE awarded multiple IDIQ contracts to the successful bidders, after which the awardees will compete for individual task orders. The total aggregate funding to be awarded under the contracts is $3.4 billion with a minimum of $2.0 million for each contract which is partly funded through the IRA. Executive Order 14154, issued on January 20, 2025, directed executive agencies of the U.S. federal government to pause the distribution of federal funding, including funding appropriated under the IRA, pending a review of programs for issuing grants, loans, contracts, or any other financial disbursements. The timing of the pause and subsequent review, as well as the outcome of such review, remain uncertain.

Removed

On October 4, 2024, DOE selected ACO and five other awardees under the November 28, 2023 solicitation aimed at HALEU deconversion, a subsequent step in the HALEU production process. The contract has a minimum value of $2.0 million and a maximum value of $0.8 billion for all awardees. On October 16, 2024, DOE selected ACO and three other awardees under the January 9, 2024 competitive solicitation aimed at expanding domestic commercial production of HALEU, which is needed to fuel many of the next-generation nuclear reactor designs currently under development. The contract has a minimum value of $2.0 million and a maximum value of $2.7 billion for all awardees. On December 10, 2024, DOE selected ACO and five other awardees under the June 27, 2024 solicitation aimed at expanding domestic commercial production of LEU. The award has a minimum contract value of $2.0 million and a maximum value of $3.4 billion over a ten-year period. The ultimate dollar amount under each contract and the potential scale of the expansion supported will depend upon the scope of task orders that DOE may subsequently issue under the contracts for which we will compete. Although we believe that we are well positioned, there is no assurance that we will be awarded any task orders under any of these contracts and, if awarded, the nature, timing and amount of the task orders that may be issued under an award is uncertain. The aggregate total appropriated funding for all awardees is $3.4 billion.

Removed

On November 6, 2024, DOE issued requests for task order proposals under the HALEU Deconversion Contract and the HALEU Enrichment Contracts. DOE contemplates issuing the task orders on a time-and-material basis with a two year period of performance for the purpose of describing the technical approach and price in a optimization study to support DOE in establishing the commercial production of HALEU and commercial deconversion of HALEU, respectively. On January 9, 2025, we submitted our proposals in response to these requests for task order proposals.

Reworded

Meanwhile, onOn November 20, 2024, the Company announced the resumption of centrifuge manufacturing activities and the expansion of its manufacturing capacity at ourits facility in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. TheAdditionally, the Company is investing an additional $60.0 million over an 18 month period to laylays the groundwork to support a potential large-scale expansion of uranium enrichment in Piketon, Ohio. This was followed with an announcement on January 23, 2026 that the Company plans to invest more than $560.0 million over the next several years to transition the facility to a high-rate manufacturing plant and support the production of thousands of advanced centrifuges in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The first new centrifuges produced in Oak Ridge are expected to come online in Ohio in 2029.

Added

On September 25, 2025, Centrus announced plans for a major expansion of its uranium capacity in Piketon, Ohio, including plans for large-scale production of both LEU and HALEU to meet commercial and government requirements. In December 2025, the Company initiated design work on a 150,000 square foot training, operations and maintenance Facility in Piketon, Ohio – a critical piece of site infrastructure necessary to support the company's plans for a major expansion of its uranium enrichment capacity in Piketon. The project involves a significant renovation and rehabilitation of an existing, largely vacant building on the site of the American Centrifuge Plant, with construction activities set to begin early 2026. The facility is expected to include a mix of office space, training facilities, and maintenance bays to support plant operations. Also in December 2025, the Company began domestic centrifuge manufacturing to support commercial LEU enrichment activities at its Piketon, Ohio, facility. This strategic move enables the Company to capitalize on its many first-mover advantages in U.S.-owned domestic uranium enrichment, and marks one of the most consequential transformations in the Company's and the United States' uranium enrichment history. Centrus plans to leverage its multi-billion-dollar uranium enrichment expansion to meet its growing backlog of $2.3 billion in contingent LEU sales to U.S. and international customer contracts, and targets future commercial-scale production of HALEU, as well. There is no assurance that we will successfully complete our announced expansion of our uranium capacity in Piketon, Ohio, or execute plans for large-scale production of both LEU and HALEU to meet commercial and government requirements. For further details, see Part 1, Item 1, Business - Low Enriched Uranium – LEU Backlog and Technical Solutions - Technical Solutions Backlog.

Added

On February 9, 2026, ACO entered into an engineering, procurement and construction contract with Fluor Federal Services, Inc. (“Fluor”), a third-party contractor, for the commercial expansion and deployment of LEU and HALEU production capability at the American Centrifuge Plant (ACP) in Piketon, Ohio. The contract provides for compensation on a time and materials basis at agreed labor rates and extends until the completion of performance.

Added

Under the contract, Fluor’s services will include design, engineering, procurement, construction and construction management, and related services to support full commercial HALEU and LEU operations. Fluor will be paid a reimbursable amount for all costs incurred in connection with the relevant work (such as labor, equipment, materials, and other direct costs), plus other agreed upon margins. ACO will fund the services by establishing a zero-balance and escrow general disbursement account that will be administered in accordance with agreed-upon procedures. ACO will authorize funds incrementally in accordance with stage gates and Fluor’s performance is limited by the authorized funding. The Company has not incurred any costs under the contract and has not deposited any funds into the escrow account. The total price paid to the Contractor will depend on the scope of the services authorized by the ACO, in accordance with the terms of the contract.

Added

The contract may be terminated or suspended by ACO or Fluor for cause, or by ACO for convenience, in which case Fluor is entitled to compensation for services and any applicable fee provided through termination. In the event of cancellation by ACO for reasons other than default, Fluor is also entitled to a cancellation fee in the initial amount of $24.0 million on the contract effective date, subsequently decreasing by $2.0 million per month until reaching $0.

Reworded

The Qualifying Advanced Energy Project Credit (“§48C”) was established by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and renewed and expanded under the IRA. The §48C program aims to strengthen U.S. industrial competitiveness and clean energy supply chains. On October 18, 2024, the Company submitted an application for a clean energy manufacturing and recycling project associated with re-equipping our manufacturing property at our manufacturing facility in Oak Ridge. This will recreate a viable enrichment supply chain and allow ACO to manufacture centrifuge parts to be used in centrifuge machines to enrich uranium. Our application requested an allocation of $62.4 million based on a qualified investment in eligible property of $208.0 million made by Centrus. On January 10, 2025, the Company was informed that the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS has”) granted our request for a $62.4 million credit allocation for this facility. Centrus now has two years from that date to provide evidence that the requirements of the credit have been met thus certifying our credit allocation. Upon certification of our credit allocation, we then have two years from that date to notify the DOE that the qualified investment in eligible property is placed in service to receive the credit allocation. It is uncertain how Executive Order 14154 will impact the IRS determination regarding our application request. For further details refer to Part II, Item 7, Liquidity and Capital Resources.Resources in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Removed

On December 20, 2024, the Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration (“NNSA”) announced that it had released a Request for Information (“RFI”) for industry input on an AC100 Deployment Demonstration to address the need for a new domestic uranium enrichment capability. This AC100 deployment demonstration will provide a limited early production capability, demonstrate one of the available centrifuge technologies, and reduce risk to meeting the NNSA defense mission requirements. The deployment demonstration will provide NNSA with data required to determine which technology or technologies may be deployed for the full range of NNSA defense mission requirements. This effort is consistent with NNSA’s approach to meet its defense mission requirements by incrementally deploying centrifuge technologies, with candidates including the AC100 centrifuge and the Domestic Uranium Enrichment Centrifuge Experiment (“DUECE”) centrifuge being developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (“ORNL”). NNSA’s incremental approach enables the phase-in of low-enriched uranium (LEU) production capacity as soon as possible to ensure timely delivery of LEU for defense mission requirements. The Company intends to respond to the RFI.

Reworded

On November 7, 2024, the Company issued, in a Rule 144A offering,issued 2.25% Convertible Notes with an aggregate principal amount of $402.5 million, due November 1, 2030, unless earlier repurchased, redeemed or converted. On August 18, 2025, the Company issued 0% Convertible Notes with an aggregate principal amount of $805.0 million, due August 15, 2032, unless earlier repurchased, redeemed or converted. The proceeds from both the 2.25% Convertible Notes and the 0% Convertible Notes will be used for general working capital and corporate purposes, which may include investment in technology development or deployment, repayment or repurchase of outstanding debt, capital expenditures, potential acquisitions and other business opportunities and purposes. There are no required principal payments prior to the maturity of the 2.25% Convertible Notes. The 2.25% Convertible Notes bear interest at an annual rate of 2.25%, payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and November 11, of each year, beginning on May 1, 2025. TheThere Companyare incurredno approximatelyrequired $13.8principal millionpayments inprior issuance costs forto the issuancematurity of the 0% Convertible Notes or the 2.25% Convertible Notes. For further details refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources.

Added

Pursuant to a notice of redemption issued on February 24, 2025, on March 26, 2025, the Company redeemed all 8.25% Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the $74.3 million aggregate principal amount, together with any accrued and unpaid interest. The Company recorded a gain of $11.8 million related to the extinguishment of the long-term debt.

Added

On June 30, September 30, and December 31, 2025, the Company provided notice to holders of the 2.25% Convertible Notes that the notes became convertible at the option of the holders beginning on the first day of the respective subsequent quarter, and ending at the close of business on the last day of said quarter. The notes are convertible at a conversion rate of 10.2564 shares of Class A Common Stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes, which is equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $97.50 per share of Class A Common Stock. The 2.25% Convertible Notes became convertible because the last reported sale price of shares of the Class A Common Stock, for at least 20 trading days during the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on, and including, the last trading day of each of the three calendar quarters, was greater than 130% of the conversion price in effect on each applicable trading day.

Added

For further details on our notes refer to Part II, Item 7, Liquidity and Capital Resources.

Reworded

While the monthly price indicators have increased for several years, the uranium enrichment segment of the nuclear fuel market remains oversupplied and faces uncertainty about future demand for nuclear power generation. However, without Russian supply, the global market would be undersupplied for uranium enrichment. ChangesRecent data from the International Trade Commission shows a significant increase in the importation of enriched uranium into the U.S. from China beginning in 2023. If this trend continues, it will likely result in significant changes in the competitive landscape that will affect pricing trends, changeaffect customer spending patterns, create uncertainty and createlikely uncertainty.have a negative impact on our business. To address these changes, we have taken steps to adjust our cost structure; we may seek further adjustments to our cost structure and operations and evaluate opportunities to grow our business organically or through acquisitions and other strategic transactions.

Reworded

The global nuclear industry outlook has begunbegan to improve after many years of decline and stagnation. The development of advanced small and large-scale reactors, the innovation of advanced fuel types, and the commitment of nations to begin deploying nuclear power or to increase the share of nuclear power in their nations has created optimism in the market. Part of the momentum has resulted from efforts to lower greenhouse gas emissions to combat climate change and improve health and safety.

Reworded

According to the WNA, as of January 2025,2026, there were approximately 6570 reactors under construction worldwide, approximately one-half of which are in China. The United States, with over 90 operating reactors, remains the world’s largest market for nuclear fuel. The nuclear industry in the United States, Japan, and Europe faces headwinds as well as opportunities. In the United States, the industry has been under pressure from the expansion of subsidized renewable energy as well as relatively low-cost natural gas resources in recent years,years. although natural gas prices in the U.S. electricity sector tripled between 2020 and 2022 according to data from the EIA. NineEight U.S. reactors have prematurely shut down in the past ten years and others could shut down in the next few years. At the same time, construction was completed and commercial operations began in the second quarter of 2024 on one large reactor and two formerly shutdown reactors have plans to restart. In 2023, the DOE released a report outlining a pathway to deployment of approximately 200 gigawatts of additional capacity by 2050 which would triple the nuclear energy capacity in the United States.

Reworded

The IEA projects that global nuclear energy generation will grow substantially in the next three decades. In the IEA’s 20242025 World Energy Outlook, nuclear generation is forecasted to grow by 18%38% by 20302035 and 47%62% by 2040 under the “Stated Policies” scenario. In the “Net Zero Emissions by 2050” scenario, nuclear generation would grow by 41%70% by 20302035 and more than double by 2040.

Reworded

In October 2020, the DOC reached an agreement with the Russian Federation on an extension of the RSA, a trade agreement which allows for Russian-origin nuclear fuel to be exported to the United States in limited quantities. The two parties agreed to extend the agreement through 2040 and to set aside a significant portion of the annual quota for Centrus’ shipments to the United States through 2028 to execute our long-term TENEX Supply Contract with TENEX. This outcome allows for sufficient quota for Centrus to continue serving its utility customers and support its investments in building new capacity. Use of this quota is subject to compliance with limitations under the RSA. These limitations include a requirement that we return natural uranium to TENEX for the LEU we receive under the TENEX Supply Contract at approximately the same time that we deliver the LEU to our customers. Our ability to meet this requirement depends on the capacity or willingness of the facilities where natural uranium is supplied to us by customers, to allow us to deliver this natural uranium to TENEX. In 2023, weWe were notified by one facility that it will no longer receive natural uranium for TENEX. As a result, we will need to rely to a greater extent on deliveries at other processors or explore other options in order to comply with the RSA’s natural uranium delivery requirement.

Removed

On July 13, 2023, the Company and TerraPower, LLC (“TerraPower”) entered into a memorandum of understanding (“MOU”) to expand their collaboration aimed at establishing commercial-scale, domestic production capabilities for HALEU to fuel the NatriumTM reactor that TerraPower is building in Wyoming. Under this MOU, the Company and TerraPower will explore collaboration to ensure the Natrium demonstration reactor has access to HALEU at the milestones necessary to meet the project's 2030 operation date. Subject to a definitive agreement to be negotiated, Centrus would work toward scaling up production capacity with additional centrifuge cascades to meet TerraPower's fuel requirements.

Removed

On August 28, 2023, the Company and Oklo Inc. (“Oklo”) announced a new MOU to support the deployment of Oklo’s advanced fission powerhouses and advanced nuclear fuel production in Southern Ohio subject to a definitive agreement to be negotiated. Oklo and Centrus plan to enter into a broad range of collaboration programs supporting the development and operation of Oklo’s Aurora powerhouses, including supply of HALEU produced by Centrus at the Piketon, Ohio facility. Centrus also intends to buy clean, reliable, and affordable energy from Oklo’s planned Ohio plants to power its HALEU production facility.

Reworded

The war in Ukraine has escalated tensions between Russia and the international community, and particularly the United States.community. As a result, the United States and other countries have imposed, including through the U.S.’s enactment of the Import Ban Act discussed below, and may continue imposing, additional sanctionssanctions, tariffs, and export controls against certain Russian products, services, organizations and/or individuals.individuals, and Russia passed the Russian Decree as discussed below. Such additional restrictionsrestrictions, and any Russian response thereto, could affect our ability to purchase, take delivery of, transport, or re-sell Russian uranium enrichment, engage in transactions with TENEX, or implement the TENEX Supply Contract, which would have a negative material impact on our business. Further, sanctionstariffs or restrictionssanctions by the United States, Russia or other countries may impact our ability and the cost to transport, export, import, take delivery, or make payments related to the LEU we purchase and may require us to increase purchases from non-Russian sources to the extent available. For example, due to restrictions imposed by Canada on the ability of Canadian persons and entities to provide ocean transportation services to Russia, a permit is required for our shipper, a Canadian company, to transport the LEU that we procure under the TENEX Supply Contract to the United States. A Canadian permit issued to our shipper was extended to March 2027, but for so long as the sanctions remain in place, the shipper will require further extensions beyond the current validityexpiration of the permit for continued shipments of LEU imports. In addition, on June 24, 2024, members of the EU agreed to issue a 14th sanctions package, primarily targeting the export of Russian liquid natural gas and other services. The sanctions package includes restrictions on the transportation of empty containers to Russia. Since we supply empty cylinders under the TENEX Supply Contract that are filled and returned to us, this new sanctions package may impact the transportation of LEU from Russia to the extent such export activity has a nexus to an EU member state (e.g., through a ship’s flag, nationalities of crew members, etc.). This new sanctions package does not impact our near term deliveries. We are working with our shipper to determine the extent of the impact of the new sanctions on the transportation of LEU from Russia which may ultimately require our shipper to obtain special authorizations for the shipment of empty containers to Russia if a nexus with an EU member state exists. The U.S. and Canadian governments have indicated that the EU agrees that these sanctions should not apply to these containers and are working with the EU to clarify.

Reworded

In response to the war in Ukraine, on May 13, 2024, the Import Ban Act was enacted. This new law bans imports of LEU from Russia into the U.S. beginning August 11, 2024, subject to issuance of waivers by the DOE. In accordance with the instructions published by the DOE on May 24, 2024, the Company filed its first waiver request application on May 27, 2024, to permit the importation of LEU already committed for delivery to its U.S. customers in 2024 through 2027. On July 18, 2024, the DOE issued the Company a waiver allowing it to import LEU from Russia for deliveries already committed by the Company to its U.S. customers in years 2024 and 2025. For the years 2026 and 2027, the DOE deferred its decision to an unspecified date closer in time to the deliveries. On August 4, 2025, the DOE issued the Company a waiver allowing it to import LEU from Russia for deliveries already committed by the Company to its U.S. customers in years 2026 and 2027. On June 7, 2024, the Company filed a second waiver request application to allow for importation of LEU from Russia for processing and reexportcommitted to the Company's foreign customers.customers for processing and reexport. On October 31, 2024, the DOE issued its determination waiving the prohibition of the importation of such material committed to our foreign customers scheduled in 2025.customers. On December 11, 2024, the Company filed a third waiver request application to allow for importation of LEU from Russia in 2026 and 2027 for use in future sales to our U.S. customers. The U.S. ban on imports of Russian LEU, without the grant of additional timely waivers, would have a negative material impact on our business and financial condition.business. Through 2027, well over one-half of the LEU that we expect to deliver to customers wasis expected to be sourced under the TENEX Supply Contract. While we have other sources of supply that may be available,supply, they are not sufficient to replace the TENEX supply or may not be available in 2025.supply. It is uncertain whether any waiver would be granted in response to our pending or any potential future applications and, if granted, whether any waiver would be granted in a timely manner for us to benefit from it.

Reworded

On November 14, 2024 the government of the Russian Federation passed the Russian Decree, effective through December 31, 2025,2027, that rescinded TENEX’s general license to export LEU to the United States or to entities registered in the United States. Accordingly, TENEX is required to obtain a specific export license from the Russian authorities in order for it to make shipments to Centrus through 2025.2027. CentrusExcept hasfor beenisolated informed thatdelays, TENEX has received three specific licenses to datesatisfy which allow TENEXshipments to exportCentrus LEU toin the U.S.regular for our pending orders. Centrus will use the majoritycourse of thisbusiness. LEU to satisfy pending orders to a single customer on a delayed basis in reliance on our contractual rights. TENEX has informed Centrus of its plan to seek additional export licenses to meet its delivery obligations under the TENEX Supply Contract for our other pending and future orders.However, Centrus has been informed that there is no certainty whether additional licenses will be issued by the Russian authorities and if issued, whether they will be issued in a timely manner and not rescinded prior to the shipment taking place. Refer to Part 1, Item 1- Business and Item 1A - Risk Factors, Operational Risks and - War in Ukraine Risks, for further discussion.

Reworded

There is draft legislation in the U.S. Congress designed to impose sanctions on Rosatom which would effectively prohibit (again, subject to government-issued waivers) transactions with TENEX, a subsidiary of Rosatom. Since the enactment of the Import Ban Act and through the issuance of the Russian Decree, TENEX has continued to implement the TENEX Supply Contract while we pursue waivers from the DOE, and since the issuance of the Russian Decree TENEX has sought the necessary export licenses.DOE. However, we do not know what future actions, including in response to the Russian Decree, TENEX might take. If TENEX refuses to make future deliveries or otherwise suspends deliveries for an extended period under the TENEX Supply Contract, our delivery obligations to our customers would be negatively impacted, includingwhich would have a material adverse effect on the Company. Refer to Part 1, Item 1-, Business and Item 1A -, Risk Factors, - Operational Risks and - War in Ukraine Risks, for further discussion.

Added

On April 15, 2025, the President of the United States signed Executive Order 14272 initiating a U.S. Department of Commerce investigation under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, to determine whether imports of processed critical minerals, including uranium, and their derivative products threaten to impair national security. Following the investigation, on January 14, 2026, the President issued Proclamation 11001, which directed the Secretary of Commerce and the United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) to pursue negotiations with trading partners over the next 180 days to ensure the United States maintains adequate supplies of critical minerals while mitigating supply-chain vulnerabilities affecting processed critical minerals and their derivative products. Proclamation 11001 indicated that, depending on the status or outcome of those negotiations, alternative remedies may be considered in the future, including the imposition of an additional sectoral tariff. The imposition of new or increased tariffs on these products or other trade restrictions from our international suppliers could significantly increase our costs and have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

Added

In addition to limitations targeted specifically at imports of LEU, the expanding sanctions imposed by the United States and foreign governments on the mechanisms used to make payments to Russia and to obtain services, including transportation and other services, have increased the risk that implementation of the TENEX Supply Contract may be disrupted in the future. For example, effective January 10, 2025, the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, made a determination pursuant to section l(a)(i) of Executive Order 14024, to apply certain sanctions to any person determined, pursuant to that section, to operate or have operated in “the energy sector of the Russian Federation economy.” TENEX’s financial institutions have had challenges in accepting payments denominated in U.S. dollars and the Company and TENEX have agreed to delay certain payments under the TENEX Supply Contract as the parties review payment processing options. Additionally, on April 17, 2025, the Office of the USTR released a notice issuing the results of its investigation into China’s dominance in the maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding sectors pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. The USTR imposed new service fees on Chinese-built vessels entering U.S. ports above certain capacity. Our shipper of Russian LEU from Russia to the U.S. uses ships manufactured in China which happen to be exempt from the new fees under this notice. However, these fees would be significant if they were to be imposed on our shipper. If the USTR changes its position and does not exempt the type of vessel our shipper uses, then the additional fees imposed on our shipper for docking at U.S. ports would be cost prohibitive, would have a significant impact on our ability to transport Russian LEU and would also have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations. If the U.S. government were to prohibit companies and individuals from engaging in transactions with Rosatom and its subsidiaries, including TENEX, the Company and its suppliers could not implement the TENEX Supply Contract absent a license or other authorization from the sanctioning government.

Removed

In addition to limitations targeted specifically at imports of LEU, the expanding sanctions imposed by the United States and foreign governments on the mechanisms used to make payments to Russia and to obtain services, including transportation and other services, have increased the risk that implementation of the TENEX Supply Contract may be disrupted in the future. If the U.S. government were to prohibit companies and individuals from engaging in transactions with Rosatom and its subsidiaries, including TENEX, the Company and its suppliers could not implement the TENEX Supply Contract absent a license or other authorization from the sanctioning government.

Reworded

Given all the foregoing, we continue to monitor the situation closely and assess the potential impact of any new sanctions or restrictions on the Company or potential tariffs on products it imports or purchases from foreign suppliers and possible mitigation thereof.

Reworded

For further discussion of these risks and uncertainties, refer to Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors - The current war in Ukraine and related international sanctionsor U.S. sanctions, tariffs and restrictions on tradetrade, and the Russian response thereto, could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Reworded

Our revenues, operating results, and cash flows can fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year. Our LEU segment backlog consists primarily of long-term, fixed commitment contracts and contingent sales commitments, and we have visibility on a significant portion of our revenue for 2025-2027,2026 - 2030, although our revenue is subject to material adverse impacts from the Import Ban Act and the Russian Decree.

Reworded

•Our ability to obtain additional waivers to allow us to import LEU from Russia sofor thatfuture we may continue supplying LEUsales to our U.S. customers, given the enactment of the Import Ban Act in May 2024;

Reworded

•The ability of TENEX to obtain, or timely obtain, and the willingness of TENEX to continue to request, additional licenses to export LEU from Russia so that we may continue supplying LEU to our customers, given the enactment and extension of the Russian Decree in November 2024;

Reworded

•Recently enacted tariffs and sanctions and the potential for additional tariffs, sanctions and other measures that restrict with whom we may transact or affect the importation, sales or purchases of SWU or uranium or goods or services required for the sale, purchase, transportation or delivery of such SWU or uranium;

Reworded

•Our ability to be awarded any additional task orders under any of the HALEU Production Contract, LEU ProductionDeconversion Contract or HALEU DeconversionProduction Contract;

Reworded

•Insufficient or untimely U.S. government funding and government appropriations to support our IDIQ contracts with the U.S. federal governmentgovernment, including the HALEU Operation Contract and HALEU Production Contract;

Reworded

The Company’s backlog across both segments iswas $3.7$3.8 billion and $2.0$3.7 billion as of December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively, and extends to 2040. The backlog is recognized as revenue in future periods as work is performed or deliveries of SWU and uranium are made.

Reworded

Our backlog in the LEU segment extends to 2040. As of December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, our backlog iswas approximately $2.8$2.9 billion and $1.0$2.8 billion, respectively. The backlog is the estimated aggregate dollar amount of revenue for future SWU and uranium deliveries primarily under medium and long-term contracts with fixed commitments. Of the $2.8$2.9 billion, approximately $2.0$2.3 billion represents contingent LEU sales contracts and commitments, with $0.8$2.1 billion of the total under definitive agreements and $1.2$0.2 billion of the total subject to entering into definitive agreements, in support of potential construction of LEU production capacity at the Piketon, Ohio facility. On February 4, 2025, we signed an agreement with Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power (“KHNP”) definitizing $0.8 billion of the $1.2 billion of contingent commitments, that were subject to contract definitization, as of December 31, 2024. The contingent LEU sales contracts and commitments also depend on our ability to secure substantial public and private investment necessary to build new enrichment capacity. The LEU segment backlog also includes approximately $0.2$0.1 billion of deferred revenue and advances from customers as of December 31, 2024,2025, whereby customers have made advance payments to be applied against future deliveries. No orders in our backlog are considered at risk related to customer operations. However, these medium and long-term contracts are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including existing import laws and restrictions, such as the RSA, which limits imports of Russian uranium products into the United States and applies to our sales using material procured under the TENEX Supply Contract, as well as the potential for additional sanctions and other restrictions affecting the Company or its suppliers, in response to the evolving situation regarding the war in Ukraine.

Reworded

Our backlog in the Technical Solutions segment extends to 2034. As of both December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, our backlog iswas approximately $0.9 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively.billion. Our backlog includes both funded amounts (services for which funding has been both authorized and appropriated by the customer), unfunded amounts (services for which funding has not been appropriated), and unexercised options in our contracts. If any of our contracts were to be terminated or options not being exercised, our remaining backlog would be reduced by the expected value of the cancelled contracts or forgone options.

Reworded

Our financial performance over time can be affected significantly by changes in prices for SWU and natural uranium hexafluoride. Market prices for SWU and uranium hexafluoride significantly declined from 2011 until mid-2018, when they began to trend upward. More recently, market uncertainty in the wake of the Russianwar invasion ofin Ukraine has driven SWU and uranium hexafluoride prices sharply higher. Since our backlog includes contracts awarded to us in previous years, the average SWU price billed to customers typically lags published price indicators by several years. Revenue in our LEU business varies based upon the timing of customer contracts. The pricing of deliveries varies depending upon the market conditions at the time the contract was signed and may not reflect current market prices.

Reworded

* Source: Nuclear Market Review, a TradeTech publication, www.uranium.info Our contracts with customers are denominated primarily in U.S. dollars, and, although revenue has not been materially affected by changes in the foreign exchange rate of the U.S. dollar, we may have a competitive price advantage or disadvantage obtaining new contracts in a competitive bidding process depending upon the weakness or strength of the U.S. dollar. Under a customer contract that commencedwith deliveries infrom 2023,2023 to 2025, prices are payable in a combination of U.S. dollars and euros. Costs of our primary competitors are denominated in other currencies. Our contracts with suppliers are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars. We have a SWU supply agreement, that commenced in 2023, with prices payable in a combination of U.S. dollars and euros.euros but with a contract-defined exchange rate.

Reworded

Components of retirement benefit expense/income other than service cost are presented in our Consolidated Statements of Operations as Nonoperating Components of Net Periodic Benefit Income.Loss (Income). These components consist primarily of the return on plan assets, offset by interest cost as the discounted present value of benefit obligations nears payment. Results also reflect claims experience, changes in mortality and healthcare claim assumptions and changes in market interest rates. Service cost is recognized in Cost of Sales (for the LEU segment) and Selling, General and Administrative expense.expenses.

Reworded

Nonoperating Components of Net Periodic Benefit Loss (Income) netted to loss of $6.8 million, income of $14.7 million, $23.2 million, and $6.6income of $23.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, 2024, 2023, and 2022,2023, including a net actuarial loss of $2.9 million, gain of $17.9 millionmillion, for the year ended December 31, 2024, net actuarialand gain of $24.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023,2025, 2024, and net2023, actuarialrespectively. loss of $7.8 million forFor the year ended December 31, 2022.2025, the net actuarial loss reflected unfavorable investment returns relative to the expected return assumption and a decrease in interest rates from approximately 5.7% to 5.6%. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the net actuarial gain reflected an annuitization in May 2024, favorable investment returns relative to the expected return assumption and an increase in interest rates from approximately 5.2% to 5.65%,5.7%, partially offset by unfavorable investment returns relative to the expected return assumption. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the net actuarial gainloss reflected favorable investment returns relative to the expected return assumption, partially offset by a decrease in interest rates from approximately 5.5% to 5.2%. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the net actuarial loss reflected unfavorable investment returns relative to the expected return assumption, partially offset by an increase in interest rates from approximately 2.8% to 5.5%, favorable investment returns relative to the expected return assumption, and healthcare claims assumption, partially offset by changes in mortality, healthcare costs trend assumptions, and claims experience.

Reworded

In 2022,2023, 20232024, and 2024,2025, Centrus evaluated both positive and negative evidence that was objectively verifiable to determine the amount of the federal valuation allowance that was required on Centrus’ federal deferred tax assets. Based on an analysis of the positive and negative evidence, it was determined that no change to the federal valuation allowance was necessary in 2022. In 2023, Centrus had visibility on a significant portion of revenue in the LEU segment for 2024 through 2026, primarily from its long-term sales contracts. Centrus determined that the positive evidence of increased forecasted future income in the LEU segment based on existing sales backlog and supply contracts along with commodity market forward pricing indicators, supported the release of a portion of the federal valuation allowance. However, because of the lack of objectively verifiable information in later years, it was determined that forecasted future income was not sufficient to realize all the deferred tax assets. Therefore, Centrus recorded a partial release of its federal valuation allowance. In the third and fourth quarters of 2023, respectively, Centrus released $7.7 million and $11.7 million of the valuation allowance against its federal net deferred tax assets. In 2024, Centrus had visibility on a significant portion of revenue in the LEU segment for 2025 through 2027, primarily from its long-term sales contracts. Additionally, Centrus’ interest income forecast increased based upon increased liquidity. Centrus determined that the positive evidence of increased forecasted future income in the LEU segment based on existing sales backlog and supply contracts along with commodity market forward pricing indicators, and interest outlook supported the release of a portion of the federal valuation allowance. However, because of the lack of objectively verifiable information in later years, it was determined that forecasted future income was not sufficient to realize all the deferred tax assets. In the fourth quarter of 2024, Centrus released $16.6 million of the valuation allowance against its federal net deferred tax assets. In the third quarter of 2025, Centrus had visibility on a significant portion of revenue in the LEU segment for 2025 through 2030, primarily from its long-term sales contracts. Additionally, Centrus’ investment income forecast increased based upon increased liquidity. Centrus determined that the positive evidence of increased future investment income supported the release of the federal valuation allowance. However, because of the lack of objectively verifiable information in later years, it was determined that forecasted future income was not sufficient to realize all the deferred tax assets. Therefore, in the third quarter of 2025, Centrus released $10.2 million of the valuation allowance against its federal net deferred tax assets.

Reworded

Revenue from the LEU segment was $349.9$346.2 million and $269.0$349.9 million for the year ended December 31, 20242025 and 2023,2024, respectively, ana increasedecrease of $80.9$3.7 million (or 30%1%). Uranium revenue increaseddecreased $42.3$55.6 million (or 70%54%) while SWU revenue increased $51.9 million (or 21%) as a result of a 50% increase in the average price of uranium sold and a 13%23% increase in the volume of uranium sold. SWU revenue increased $38.6 million (or 19%) as a result of a 24% increase in the average price of SWU sold, partially offset by a 4%1% decrease in the volumeaverage price of SWU sold.

Showing the first 60 of 128 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-08-06 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-05-06 (period ending 2026-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

4new paragraphs
4removed paragraphs
2reworded paragraphs
416 → 603words in section

New heading “We may require additional capital to support the growth of our business, and this capital might not be available on acceptable terms, if at all, and future sales of our common stock, including under our ATM program, or the incurrence of additional debt could dilute our stockholders.”

Removed heading “We are integrating AI technologies into our operations, including through strategic partnerships, which may present business, compliance, regulatory and reputational risks.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: litigation, cyberattack, ai
“In addition, AI technologies could be improperly utilized by our employees or by personnel of our business partners, potentially leading to the unauthorized use or disclosure of confidential, proprietary or classified information or unintended, unexpected, or otherwise unforeseen adverse consequences, which could harm our reputation and expose us to significant legal, regulatory and contractual liability. AI also presents a new attack surface that cyber threat actors may exploit to scale and automate targeted cyberattacks. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: ai
“We are integrating AI technologies into our operations, including through strategic partnerships, which may present business, compliance, regulatory and reputational risks.”
see in full comparison
New text
“We may require additional capital to support the growth of our business, and this capital might not be available on acceptable terms, if at all, and future sales of our common stock, including under our ATM program, or the incurrence of additional debt could dilute our stockholders.”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: breach
“We and our business partners are increasingly incorporating AI-driven software tools across various aspects of the Company's operations and business functions, including to streamline workflows and optimize key business processes. While we believe the adoption of AI-driven technologies will enhance our operational efficiency and competitive positioning, these technologies involve significant risks and uncertainties that may not yield corresponding benefits, and may exacerbate other risks. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: ai
“If we fail to successfully integrate AI into our business processes or fail to keep pace with rapidly evolving AI technological developments, we may face competitive disadvantages or experience disruptions to our operations or other unintended, unexpected, or otherwise unforeseen adverse consequences. Any of the foregoing risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.”
see in full comparison
New text
“If we incur additional debt, including additional convertible debt, the debt holders would have rights senior to holders of our Class A Common Stock to make claims on our assets, and the terms of any debt could restrict our operations, including our ability to pay dividends on our common stock. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (10)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes to the Risk Factors described in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.2025 and in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2026.

Reworded

GeneralFinancial Risk FactorsRisks

Added

We may require additional capital to support the growth of our business, and this capital might not be available on acceptable terms, if at all, and future sales of our common stock, including under our ATM program, or the incurrence of additional debt could dilute our stockholders.

Added

We intend to continue to make investments to support the growth of our business, including through the expansion of our uranium enrichment and manufacturing capabilities in Piketon, Ohio and Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and through acquisitions, joint ventures, or other strategic transactions. We cannot be certain when or if our operations will generate sufficient cash to fully fund our ongoing operations or the growth of our business. To achieve our growth plans and pursue future opportunities, we may need to raise additional funds through the issuance of equity securities or through the incurrence of additional debt. Additional capital may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to obtain adequate additional capital on terms satisfactory to us, our ability to support our business growth and respond to business opportunities and challenges could be significantly impaired and our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Added

We maintain a sales agreement with our sales agents under which we may offer and sell shares of our Class A Common Stock from time to time in “at the market” offerings, up to an aggregate offering price of $1.0 billion. Shares sold under our ATM program are issued pursuant to our automatic shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-291305), which we filed with the SEC on November 6, 2025 and which became effective on November 6, 2025, and pursuant to which we may offer and sell securities, including common stock, preferred stock, and debt securities, from time to time, and we retain broad discretion over how we use any proceeds. Any shares we sell under our ATM program or any future equity offering will dilute the ownership interests of our existing stockholders. Sales of a substantial number of shares, or the market’s expectation that we will make such sales, could also cause the market price of our Class A Common Stock to decline.

Added

If we incur additional debt, including additional convertible debt, the debt holders would have rights senior to holders of our Class A Common Stock to make claims on our assets, and the terms of any debt could restrict our operations, including our ability to pay dividends on our common stock. Furthermore, if we issue additional equity, including pursuant to our shelf registration statement on Form S-3 or in connection with acquisitions or other strategic transactions, our stockholders will experience dilution, and the new securities could have rights, preferences, or privileges senior to those of our Class A Common Stock. Because our decision to raise capital and the means under which we determine to raise such capital in the future will depend on numerous considerations, including factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing, or nature of any future issuances of debt or equity securities. As a result, our stockholders bear the risk of future issuances of debt or equity securities reducing the value of our common stock and diluting their interests.

Removed

We are integrating AI technologies into our operations, including through strategic partnerships, which may present business, compliance, regulatory and reputational risks.

Removed

We and our business partners are increasingly incorporating AI-driven software tools across various aspects of the Company's operations and business functions, including to streamline workflows and optimize key business processes. While we believe the adoption of AI-driven technologies will enhance our operational efficiency and competitive positioning, these technologies involve significant risks and uncertainties that may not yield corresponding benefits, and may exacerbate other risks. Flaws, biases, errors, misconfigurations or malfunctions in AI-driven systems could result in operational disruptions or could result in unintended, unexpected, or otherwise unforeseen adverse consequences, including data loss, corruption or the generation of outputs that appear correct but are inaccurate or misleading. Such failures could include potential breaches of contracts, security protocols, unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or classified information and noncompliance with applicable governmental and defense-related or third party requirements.

Removed

In addition, AI technologies could be improperly utilized by our employees or by personnel of our business partners, potentially leading to the unauthorized use or disclosure of confidential, proprietary or classified information or unintended, unexpected, or otherwise unforeseen adverse consequences, which could harm our reputation and expose us to significant legal, regulatory and contractual liability. AI also presents a new attack surface that cyber threat actors may exploit to scale and automate targeted cyberattacks. The regulatory environment governing AI technologies remains uncertain and developments in regulatory frameworks may adversely affect our ability to use AI technologies, subject us to enhanced governmental or regulatory scrutiny, litigation or enforcement actions or require us to make significant changes to our operations. Our reliance on business partners also subjects us to risks associated with each partner’s ability to comply with applicable legal and regulatory requirements and maintain the security and integrity of its systems.

Removed

If we fail to successfully integrate AI into our business processes or fail to keep pace with rapidly evolving AI technological developments, we may face competitive disadvantages or experience disruptions to our operations or other unintended, unexpected, or otherwise unforeseen adverse consequences. Any of the foregoing risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

40new paragraphs
10removed paragraphs
56reworded paragraphs
12,507 → 14,873words in section

New heading “Gross Profit (Loss)”

New heading “Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”

New heading “Selling, General, and Administrative”

New heading “Income Tax Expense”

New heading “Net Income and Comprehensive Income”

New heading “Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”

New heading “Advanced Technology Costs”

New heading “Selling, General, and Administrative”

New heading “Investment Income”

New heading “Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared with Three Months Ended June 30, 2025”

New heading “Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”

New heading “Rights Agreement”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: china, russia
“While the monthly price indicators have increased for several years, the uranium enrichment segment of the nuclear fuel market remains oversupplied and faces uncertainty about future demand for nuclear power generation. However, without Russian supply, the global market would be undersupplied for uranium enrichment. Recent data from the International Trade Commission shows a significant increase in the importation of enriched uranium into the U.S. from China beginning in 2023. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: liquidity, supply chain

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

We are also actively considering and expect to consider potential strategic transactions from time to time, which at any given time may be in various stages of discussion, diligence, or negotiation. These could involve, without limitation, acquisitions and/or dispositions of businesses or assets, joint ventures or investments in businesses, products or technologies, or changes to our capital structure. These strategic transactions may include vertical integration initiatives, such as the potential acquisition of one or more suppliers within our supply chain. In connection with any such transaction, we wouldmay seek to satisfy theseour liquidity needs through a combination of working capital, cash generated from operations, or additional debt or equity financing.financing, although there can be no assurances that any such additional financing will be available on a timely basis, on terms acceptable to us, or at all.
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: russia, ukraine
“The war in Ukraine, along with the Import Ban Act and the Russian Decree, have contributed to a significant increase in market prices for enrichment and prompted calls for public and private investment in new, domestic uranium enrichment capacity not only for HALEU production, but also for LEU production to support the existing fleet of reactors. As a result, coupled with the Company’s contract awards for HALEU and LEU production, Centrus is exploring the opportunity to deploy LEU enrichment alongside HALEU enrichment to meet a range of commercial and U.S. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: russia, ukraine
“The war in Ukraine, along with the Import Ban Act and the Russian Decree, have prompted calls for public and private investment in new, domestic uranium enrichment capacity not only for HALEU production, but also for LEU production to support the existing fleet of reactors. As a result, coupled with the Company’s contract awards for HALEU and LEU production, Centrus is exploring the opportunity to deploy LEU enrichment alongside HALEU enrichment to meet a range of commercial and U.S. government requirements, which would bring cost synergies while increasing revenue opportunities. …”
see in full comparison
New text
“Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared with Three Months Ended June 30, 2025”
see in full comparison
New text
“Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (106)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Published spot price indicators for SWU reached previous historic highs in April 2009 at $163 per SWU. In the years following the 2011 Fukushima accident in Japan, spot prices declinedfell moreto thana 75%,low bottoming out in August 2018 atof $34 per SWU.SWU by August 2018. This was followed by a period of price increases, reaching $200 per SWU by December 31, 2025, which surpassed the previous historic high.2025. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, spot prices remained steady at $200 per SWU. This represents anThe increase of 488% over the 2018 historic low. This surge in the SWU spot price beginning in 2022 has been driven primarily by uncertainty created as a result of the war in Ukraine,Ukraine coupled with growing interest in nuclear power as a source of reliable carbon-free energy. The contemplation of the imposition of tariffs on LEU, if ultimately imposed,LEU may put additional upward pressure on the price of SWU.

Reworded

When Russian supply is included, the uranium enrichment segment of the global nuclear fuel market is oversupplied. But without Russian supply, the global market for uranium enrichment would be undersupplied. Further, it is not clear that there are sufficient inventories of enriched uranium in the United States to compensate for a loss of Russian supply, absent new capacity that will take a number of years to deploy. Data from the International Trade Commission shows a significant increase in the importation of enriched uranium into the U.S. from China in 2023. If this continues, it will likely result in significant changes in the competitive landscape that will affect pricing trends, affect customer spending patterns, create uncertainty and will likely have a negative impact on our business. To address these changes, we have taken steps to adjust our cost structure; we may seek further adjustments to our cost structure and operations and evaluate opportunities to grow our business organically or through acquisitions and other strategic transactions.

Added

The war in Ukraine, along with the Import Ban Act and the Russian Decree, have prompted calls for public and private investment in new, domestic uranium enrichment capacity not only for HALEU production, but also for LEU production to support the existing fleet of reactors. As a result, coupled with the Company’s contract awards for HALEU and LEU production, Centrus is exploring the opportunity to deploy LEU enrichment alongside HALEU enrichment to meet a range of commercial and U.S. government requirements, which would bring cost synergies while increasing revenue opportunities. Our ability to deploy LEU and/or HALEU enrichment, and the timing, sequencing, and scale of those capabilities, is subject to the availability of funding and/or offtake commitments.

Reworded

Our Technical Solutions segment is focused on uranium enrichment for the nuclear industry and the U.S. government and advanced manufacturing, engineering and other technical services to government and private sector customers. Under a contract with the DOE, our Technical Solutions segment ishas been operating uranium enrichment capacity for HALEU production, and other capabilities necessary for production of advanced nuclear fuel to meet the evolving needs of the global nuclear industry and the U.S. government. We are also leveraging our unique technical expertise, operational experience, and specialized facilities to expand and diversify our business beyond uranium enrichment, offering new services to existing and new customers in complementary markets.

Reworded

In November 2023, the Company announced that it made its first contractual delivery of HALEU to the DOE, completing Phase 1 of the HALEU Operation Contract. As a result of delays in obtaining 5B Cylinders DOE is contractually obligated to provide under the HALEU Operation Contract, Phase 2 of the HALEU Operation Contract was extended through June 2025, when Centrus contractually delivered the Phase 2 production target of 900 kilograms of HALEU to DOE, completing Phase 2.2, and then was extended further through January 31, 2026 to allow the Company to complete outstanding change orders. The fee for the Phase 2 period of performance that was extended beyond November 30, 2024 was not definitized and is subject to negotiation.

Reworded

On June 17, 2025, the DOE amended the HALEU Operation Contract to divide the first three-year option period into a first option period of one year (“Option 1a”) and a second option period of two years (“Option 1b”). The amendment established a target cost and fee for Option 1a of approximately $99.3 million and $8.7 million, respectively, and a target cost and fee for Option 1b of $163.5 million and $15.2 million, respectively. In conjunction with the amendment, the DOE exercised Option 1a — launching Phase 3 of the contract effective June 30, 2025, with a period of performance through June 30, 2026. AsProduction of March 31, 2026,under Option 1a iswas fundedcompleted forin the contract value of $108.2 million. The current fiscal year 2027 DOE budget proposal does not include funding for the operation of this cascade.mid-June.

Added

On June 30, 2026, DOE issued an amendment to the HALEU Operation Contract to extend the period of performance to September 30, 2026 and to divide the upcoming two-year option period (formerly Option 1b) into a first option period of three months (still referred to as “Option 1b”) and a second option period of 21 months (“Option 1c”). Option 1b now requires 3 months of cascade maintenance and HALEU storage, with no HALEU production, for a fixed price of $15.0 million. Option 1c encompasses the remaining 21 months of HALEU production that were part of the former Option 1b. In conjunction with the amendment, the DOE exercised Option 1b. As of June 30, 2026, Option 1a is funded for the contract value of $108.2 million. The current DOE Budget proposed for fiscal year 2027 does not include funding for the operation of this cascade. Separately, DOE has communicated that it does not currently intend to exercise further options under the HALEU Operation Contract. As announced on July 1, 2026, the Company is working with DOE on agreements to enable the Company to privately operate the cascade on a commercial basis.

Reworded

The Company does not have a contractual obligation to perform work in excess of the funding provided by the DOE. If the DOE does not commit to additional costs above the existing funding, the Company may incur material additional costs or losses in future periods that could have an adverse impact on its financial condition and liquidity. The DOE owns any HALEU produced fromunder the demonstrationHALEU cascade.Operation Contract. Pursuant to an amendment to the Company’s lease for the Piketon facility, the DOE assumed all D&D liabilities arising out of the HALEU Operation Contract.

Added

The Energy Act of 2020 (“The Energy Act”) required the DOE to establish a program to support the availability of HALEU for civilian domestic research, development, demonstration, and commercial use. The Energy Act also reauthorized DOE nuclear energy research, development, demonstration, and commercial application activities, including advanced fuel, research and development for advanced reactors, used fuel technologies, and integration of nuclear energy systems for both existing plants and advanced nuclear concepts. It also authorized the funding of an ARDP which was launched by the DOE in May 2020. Nine of the ten advanced reactor designs initially selected by the DOE for its ARDP will require HALEU. Various agencies of the U.S. government, including the U.S. Department of Defense, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, and the DOE are building small modular reactors and microreactors, which demonstrates the focus on both the development of microreactors and HALEU. We believe our investments in advanced enrichment technology and our progress in demonstrating HALEU production will position the Company to meet the needs of government and commercial customers in the future as they deploy advanced reactors and next generation fuels and also offers potential cost synergies for a return to LEU production. Further, the Company is taking steps to pursue, including through the exploration of strategic partnerships, technologies that are complementary to HALEU production and critical to the HALEU ecosystem, including deconversion and fuel fabrication.

Removed

On January 5, 2026, the DOE announced one LEU and two HALEU task order awards to three companies for $900 million each, including one $900 million task order to Centrus subsidiary, ACO, under the HALEU Production Contract. Centrus was not selected for a task order award under the LEU Production Contract. Centrus remains eligible to compete for any future LEU or HALEU task orders from the DOE should additional funding become available, but additional government funding has not been requested or announced.

Reworded

TheIn June 2026, the DOE has not yet issued anytwo RFPRFTOPs under the HALEU Deconversion Contract.Contract, each for a maximum fixed price of $80.0 million. Centrus planshas tosubmitted competebids for anyboth future task ordersRFTOPs under this contract.

Added

On January 5, 2026, the DOE announced one LEU and two HALEU task order awards to three companies for $900.0 million each, including one $900.0 million task order to Centrus subsidiary, ACO, under the HALEU Production Contract. Centrus was not selected for a task order award under the LEU Production Contract. Centrus remains eligible to compete for any future LEU or HALEU task orders from the DOE should additional funding become available, but additional government funding has not been requested or announced.

Reworded

TheOn $900July million1, 2026, ACO signed a contract with the DOE governing ACO’s performance of the task order award to ACO under the HALEU Production ContractContract. The task order contract calls for the Company to expand its uranium enrichment facility in Piketon, Ohio, to include commercial-scale production of HALEU. The awardcontract also includes options, exercisable at the DOE’s discretion, for up to an additional $170.0 million to produce and deliver HALEU to the DOE. The task order is subject to negotiation of a definitive agreement and thereThere are no guarantees about whether or when funding by the DOE for such expansion would be awarded or whether we will successfully perform any awarded contract.

Added

In the time leading up to the July 1, 2026 task order contract, the Company announced, in November 2024, an anticipated $60 million investment over an 18-month period to expand the capacity of its centrifuge manufacturing facility in Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

Removed

In November 2024, the Company announced an anticipated $60 million investment over an 18-month period to expand the capacity of its centrifuge manufacturing facility in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. In January 2025, the Company announced plans to invest more than $560 million over several years to transition its Oak Ridge centrifuge manufacturing plant to high-rate manufacturing and support the production of thousands of advanced centrifuges. Centrifuge manufacturing began in Oak Ridge in December 2025, with the first new centrifuges expected to come online in Ohio in 2029.

Reworded

In September,September 2025, the Company announced plans for a major expansion of its uranium enrichment capacity in Piketon, Ohio, including plans for large-scale production of both LEU and HALEU to meet commercial and government requirements.

Reworded

In December 2025, the Company initiated design work on a 150,000 square foot training, operations and maintenance facility in Piketon, Ohio – a critical piece of site infrastructure necessary to support the Company's plans for a major expansion of its uranium enrichment capacity in Piketon. The project involves a significant renovation and rehabilitation of an existing, largely vacant building on the site of the American Centrifuge PlantACP in Piketon, Ohio. Construction activities began in early 2026. The facility is expected to include a mix of office space, training facilities, and maintenance bays to support plant operations.

Reworded

Also in December 2025, the Company began domesticcommercial centrifuge manufacturingproduction from its Oak Ridge, Tennessee facility to support commercial LEU enrichment activities at its Piketon, Ohio,Ohio facility.facility, with the first new centrifuges expected to come online in Ohio in 2029. In January 2026, the Company announced plans to invest more than $560 million over several years to transition its Oak Ridge centrifuge manufacturing plant to high-rate manufacturing and support the production of thousands of advanced centrifuges. This enables the Company to capitalize on its many first-mover advantages in U.S.-owned domestic uranium enrichment, and marks one of the most consequential transformations in the Company's and the United States' uranium enrichment history. Centrus plans to leverage its pending multi-billion-dollar uranium enrichment expansion to meet its growinggrowing, partially-contingent backlog of $2.4$3.7 billion in contingentLEU LEUand HALEU sales tounder contracts with U.S. and international customer contracts,customers, along with commercial-scale HALEU production. There is no assurance that the Company will successfully complete the announced expansion of its uranium enrichment capacity in Piketon, Ohio, or execute plans for large-scale production of both LEU and HALEU to meet commercial and government requirements.

Removed

The Company was selected for the $900 million task award from DOE on January 5, 2026. Later that month, the Company announced plans to invest more than $560 million over several years to transition its Oak Ridge centrifuge manufacturing plant to high-rate manufacturing and support the production of thousands of advanced centrifuges. Centrifuge manufacturing began in Oak Ridge in December 2025, with the first new centrifuges expected to come online in Ohio in 2029.

Reworded

In February 2026, ACO entered into an engineering,EPC procurement and construction contractContract with Fluor Federal Services, Inc. (“Fluor”), a third-party contractor, for the commercial expansion and deployment of LEU and HALEU production capability at the American Centrifuge PlantACP in Piketon, Ohio. The contract provides for compensation on a time and materials basis at agreed labor rates and extends until the completion of performance.

Reworded

In April 2026, Centrus entered into a contract with Geiger Brothers, Inc. (“Geiger Brothers”) as the construction contractor for the expansion of our uranium enrichment capacity in Piketon, Ohio. Fluor is serving as the project’s EPC contractor, while Geiger Brothers will conduct the on-the-ground construction work in Ohio. For further discussion, refer to Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies, of the Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Reworded

In March 2026, Centrus announced that the Company is exploring a joint venture with Oklo Inc. (“Oklo”) focused on deconversion services for HALEU – which currently doesdo not exist commercially. Activities under this contemplated joint venture would occur at Centrus’ site in Piketon, Ohio, to be co-located with Centrus’ enrichment operations and adjacent to Oklo’s planned 1.2 GW power campus.

Added

In June 2026, Centrus and Oklo signed a letter of intent in which Centrus agreed to supply enough domestic HALEU to power, for multiple years, up to five of Oklo’s reactors of the type identified by the trade name Aurora Powerhouse, subject to negotiation of definitive agreements. If a definitive agreement is entered into, Centrus would supply HALEU from its ACP in Pike County, Ohio to support Oklo’s planned 1.2 GW power campus in the region, with deliveries to Oklo scheduled to begin in 2029.

Reworded

For calendar quarters in which the Convertible Notes became convertible at the option of the holders, the Company provided notice to the holders of the Convertible Notes that the notes became convertible beginning on the first day of the respective subsequent quarter, and ending at the close of business on the last day of said quarter. As of AprilJuly 30,31, 2026, noone noteholder converted $2,000 worth of 2.25% Convertible Notes, which will settle in the third quarter of 2026. No other notes were converted during those periods.

Removed

The war in Ukraine, along with the Import Ban Act and the Russian Decree, have contributed to a significant increase in market prices for enrichment and prompted calls for public and private investment in new, domestic uranium enrichment capacity not only for HALEU production, but also for LEU production to support the existing fleet of reactors. As a result, coupled with the Company’s contract awards for HALEU and LEU production, Centrus is exploring the opportunity to deploy LEU enrichment alongside HALEU enrichment to meet a range of commercial and U.S. government requirements, which would bring cost synergies while increasing revenue opportunities. Our ability to deploy LEU and/or HALEU enrichment, and the timing, sequencing, and scale of those capabilities, is subject to the availability of funding and/or offtake commitments.

Removed

The Energy Act of 2020 (“The Energy Act”) required the DOE to establish a program to support the availability of HALEU for civilian domestic research, development, demonstration, and commercial use. The Energy Act also reauthorized DOE nuclear energy research, development, demonstration, and commercial application activities, including advanced fuel, research and development for advanced reactors, used fuel technologies, and integration of nuclear energy systems for both existing plants and advanced nuclear concepts. It also authorized the funding of an ARDP which was launched by the DOE in May 2020. There are a number of advanced reactors under development that would use HALEU. Nine of the ten advanced reactor designs initially selected by the DOE for its ARDP will require HALEU. Various agencies of the U.S. government, including the U.S. Department of Defense, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, and the DOE are building small modular reactors and microreactors, which demonstrates the focus on both the development of microreactors and HALEU. We believe our investments in advanced enrichment technology and our progress in demonstrating HALEU production will position the Company to meet the needs of government and commercial customers in the future as they deploy advanced reactors and next generation fuels and also offers potential cost synergies for a return to LEU production. Further, the Company is taking steps to pursue, including through the exploration of strategic partnerships, technologies that are complementary to HALEU production and critical to the HALEU ecosystem, including deconversion and fuel fabrication.

Removed

While the monthly price indicators have increased for several years, the uranium enrichment segment of the nuclear fuel market remains oversupplied and faces uncertainty about future demand for nuclear power generation. However, without Russian supply, the global market would be undersupplied for uranium enrichment. Recent data from the International Trade Commission shows a significant increase in the importation of enriched uranium into the U.S. from China beginning in 2023. If this trend continues, it will likely result in significant changes in the competitive landscape that will affect pricing trends, affect customer spending patterns, create uncertainty and will likely have a negative impact on our business. To address these changes, we have taken steps to adjust our cost structure; we may seek further adjustments to our cost structure and operations and evaluate opportunities to grow our business organically or through acquisitions and other strategic transactions.

Reworded

We are also actively considering and expect to consider potential strategic transactions from time to time, which could involve, without limitation, acquisitions and/or dispositions of businesses or assets, joint ventures or investments in businesses, products or technologies or changes to our capital structure. These strategic transactions may include vertical integration initiatives, such as the potential acquisition of one or more suppliers within our supply chain. In connection with any such transaction, we may seek additional debt or equity financing, contribute or dispose of assets, assume additional indebtedness, or partner with other parties to consummate a transaction. To provide flexibility in funding our strategic objectives, we may opportunistically raise capital through large follow-on offerings of our common stock, warrants, or a combination thereof, which could result in substantial dilution to our current investors. For further discussion, refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Reworded

According to the WNA, as of MarchJune 2026, there were 78approximately 80 reactors under construction worldwide, approximately one-half of which are in China. The United States, with 94 operating reactors, remains the world’s largest market for nuclear fuel. The nuclear industry in the United States, Japan, and Europe faces headwinds as well as opportunities. In the United States, the industry has been under pressure from the expansion of subsidized renewable energy as well as relatively low-cost natural gas resources in recent years. Eight U.S. reactors have prematurely shut down in the past ten years, and others could shut down in the next few years. At the same time, construction was completed, and commercial operations began in the second quarter of 2024 on one large reactor and two formerly shutdown reactors have plans to restart.

Reworded

In addition to limitations targeted specifically at imports of LEU, the expanding sanctions imposed by the United States and foreign governments on the mechanisms used to make payments to Russia and to obtain services, including transportation and other services, have increased the risk that implementation of the TENEX Supply Contract may be disrupted in the future. For example, effective January 10, 2025, the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, made a determination pursuant to section l(a)(i) of Executive Order 14024, to apply certain sanctions to any person determined, pursuant to that section, to operate or have operated in “the energy sector of the Russian Federation economy.” TENEX’s financial institutions have had challenges in accepting payments denominated in U.S. dollars and the Company and TENEX had for a period of time agreed to delay certain payments under the TENEX Supply Contract as the parties reviewed payment processing options. Additionally, on April 17, 2025, the Office of the USTR released a notice issuing the results of its investigation into China’s dominance in the maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding sectors pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. The USTR imposed new service fees on Chinese-built vessels entering U.S. ports above certain capacity. Our shipper of Russian LEU from Russia to the U.S. uses ships manufactured in China which happen to be exempt from the new fees under this notice. However, these fees would be significant if they were to be imposed on our shipper. If the USTR changes its position and does not exempt the type of vessel our shipper uses, then the additional fees imposed on our shipper for docking at U.S. ports would be cost prohibitive, would have a significant impact on our ability to transport Russian LEU and would also have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations. If the U.S. government were to prohibit companies and individuals from engaging in transactions with Rosatom and its subsidiaries, including TENEX, the Company and its suppliers could not implement the TENEX Supply Contract absent a license or other authorization from the sanctioning government. Further, the United States government is presently considering draft legislation that, if adopted in its current form, could lead to the imposition of significant duties on goods being imported from Russia. While the draft legislation excludes uranium from the scope of such duties, application of such duties to the ancillary goods that are necessarily transported together with uranium could impact the cost or availability of uranium shipping services.

Reworded

For further discussion of these risks and uncertainties, refer to Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 and under Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, and under Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Reworded

For further discussion of these risks and uncertainties, refer to Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20252025, under Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, and under Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Reworded

The Company’s backlog is $3.9$4.5 billion and $3.8 billion as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively, and extends to 2040. The backlog is recognized as revenue in future periods as work is performed or deliveries of SWU and uranium are made.

Reworded

Our backlog in the LEU segment extends to 2040. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, our backlog was approximately $3.1$3.7 billion and $2.9 billion, respectively. The backlog is the estimated aggregate dollar amount of revenue for future SWU and uranium deliveries primarily under medium and long-term contracts with fixed commitments. Of the $3.1$3.7 billion, approximately $2.4$3.0 billion represents contingent LEU and HALEU sales contracts and commitments, all$2.4 billion of which are under definitive agreements, in support of potential construction of LEU and HALEU production capacity at the Piketon, Ohio facility. The contingent sales commitments depend on our abilitytend to secure substantial public and private investment necessaryrelate to buildachievement newof enrichmentoperational capacity.milestones. The LEU segment backlog also includes approximately $0.1 billion of deferred revenue and advances from customers as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, whereby customers have made advance payments to be applied against future deliveries. No orders in our backlog are considered at risk related to customer operations. However, these medium and long-term contracts are subject to other significant risks and uncertainties, including existing trade laws and restrictions such as the RSA, Import Ban Act, and the Russian Decree, as well as the potential for additional sanctions and other restrictions affecting the Company or its suppliers, in response to the evolving situation regarding the war in Ukraine.

Reworded

Our backlog in the Technical Solutions segment extends to 2034. As of bothJune March 31,30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, our backlog was approximately $0.8 billion and $0.9 billion, respectively. Our backlog includes both funded amounts (services for which funding has been both authorized and appropriated by the customer), unfunded amounts (services for which funding has not been appropriated), and unexercised options in our contracts. If any of our contracts were to be terminated or options not being exercised, our remaining backlog would be reduced by the expected value of the cancelled contracts or forgone options. The current DOE budget proposed for fiscal year 2027 does not include further funding for the operation of the HALEU cascade under the HALEU Operation Contract, which represents $0.8 billion of the Technical Solutions backlog as of June 30, 2026. Separately, DOE has communicated that it does not currently intend to exercise further options under the HALEU Operation Contract.

Removed

Revenue

Reworded

Revenue from our LEU segment accounted for approximately 58%87% and 78% of our total revenue for the three and six months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026. The majority of our customers are domestic and international utilities that operate nuclear power plants, with international sales constituting approximately 44%50% of revenue from our LEU segment since 2024. Our agreements with electric utilities are primarily medium and long-term fixed-commitment contracts under which our customers are obligated to purchase a specified quantity of the SWU component of LEU from us. Contracts where we sell both the SWU and natural uranium hexafluoride components of LEU to utilities or where we sell natural uranium hexafluoride or uranium concentrates to utilities and other nuclear fuel related companies are generally shorter-term, fixed-commitment contracts. Individual customer orders for the SWU component of LEU fulfilled in the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 averaged approximately $13.7$11.7 million per order. As a result, a relatively small shift in the timing of customer orders for LEU may cause significant variability in our operating results period over period.

Reworded

Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 Compared with Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025

Removed

Revenue

Reworded

Revenue from the LEU segment was $44.6$153.4 million and $51.3$125.7 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, aan decreaseincrease of $6.7$27.7 million (or 13%22%). The Company had uranium revenue of $53.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026. SWU revenue decreased for the three months ended June 30, 2026 by $9.7$25.7 million as a result of a 47%23% decrease in the volume of SWU sold, partially offset by a 52%3% increase in the average price of SWU sold. The Company had uranium revenue of $3.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026.

Reworded

Revenue from the Technical Solutions segment was $32.1$22.7 million and $21.8$28.8 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, ana increasedecrease of $10.3$6.1 million (or 47%21%). The increasedecrease in revenue iswas primarily attributable to a $9.8$5.9 million increasedecrease in revenue generated by the HALEU Operation Contract, while the remaining change iswas related to other contracts. Revenue from the HALEU Operation Contract is recorded on a cost-plus-incentive-fee basis and includes a target fee for Phases 2 and 3 of the contract.

Removed

Cost of sales for the LEU segment was $16.7 million and $20.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively, a decrease of $3.4 million (or 17%). SWU costs decreased as a result of a 47% decrease in the volume of SWU sold, partially offset by a 45% increase in the average unit cost of SWU sold. Uranium costs increased primarily as a result of an increase in the volume of uranium sold.

Reworded

Cost of sales for the Technical SolutionsLEU segment was $28.5$101.8 million and $20.1$75.0 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, an increase of $8.4$26.8 million (or 42%36%). TheUranium increasecosts isincreased primarily attributableas toa result of an $8.2 million increase in the volume of uranium sold. SWU costs incurreddecreased underas a result of a 23% decrease in the HALEUvolume Operationof Contract,SWU whilesold, partially offset by a 13% increase in the remainingaverage changeunit iscost attributableof toSWU other contracts.sold.

Added

Cost of sales for the Technical Solutions segment was $24.4 million and $25.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, a decrease of $1.2 million (or 5%). The decrease was primarily attributable to a $1.9 million decrease in costs incurred under the HALEU Operation Contract, while the remaining change was attributable to other contracts.

Added

Gross Profit (Loss)

Added

Gross profit for the LEU segment was $51.6 million and $50.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, an increase of $0.9 million (or 2%). LEU customers generally have multi-year contracts that carry annual purchase commitments, not quarterly commitments. The gross profit in our LEU business varies based upon the timing of those contracts. The pricing applied to deliveries varies depending upon the market conditions at the time the contract was signed. The increase for the three months ended June 30, 2026 was primarily due to the change in the composition of contracts quarter over quarter.

Added

Gross profit (loss) for the Technical Solutions segment was a loss of $1.7 million and profit of $3.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, a decrease of $4.9 million (or 153%). The decrease was primarily attributable to the factors discussed above in relation to the HALEU Operation Contract.

Added

Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2025

Added

Revenue from the LEU segment was $198.0 million and $177.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, an increase of $21.0 million (or 12%). Uranium revenue increased by $56.4 million. SWU revenue decreased by $35.4 million as a result of a 31% decrease in the volume of SWU sold, partially offset by a 16% increase in the average price of SWU sold.

Added

Revenue from the Technical Solutions segment was $54.8 million and $50.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, an increase of $4.2 million (or 8%). The increase in revenue was primarily attributable to a $3.9 million increase in revenue generated by the HALEU Operation Contract, while the remaining change was related to other contracts. Revenue from the HALEU Operation Contract is recorded on a cost-plus-incentive-fee basis and includes a target fee for Phases 2 and 3 of the contract.

Added

Cost of Sales

Added

Cost of sales for the LEU segment was $118.5 million and $95.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, an increase of $23.4 million (or 25%). Uranium costs increased for the six months ended June 30, 2026. SWU costs decreased as a result of a 31% decrease in the volume of SWU sold, partially offset by a 23% increase in the average unit cost of SWU sold.

Added

Cost of sales for the Technical Solutions segment was $52.9 million and $45.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, an increase of $7.2 million (or 16%). The increase was primarily attributable to a $6.3 million increase in costs incurred under the HALEU Operation Contract, while the remaining change was attributable to other contracts.

Reworded

Gross profit for the LEU segment was $27.9$79.5 million and $31.2$81.9 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, a decrease of $3.3$2.4 million (or 11%3%). LEU customers generally have multi-year contracts that carry annual purchase commitments, not quarterly commitments. The gross profit in our LEU business varies based upon the timing of those contracts. The pricing applied to deliveries varies depending upon the market conditions at the time the contract was signed. The decrease for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 was primarily due to the composition of contracts indelivered during the current quarter, compared to the prior quarter.period.

Reworded

Gross profit for the Technical Solutions segment was $3.6$1.9 million and $1.7$4.9 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, ana increasedecrease of $1.9$3.0 million (or 112%61%). The increasedecrease was primarily attributable toan the factors discussed above. Because of the delayincrease in completingcosts Phaseincurred 2 ofunder the HALEU Operation Contract, DOE extended the Phase 2 period of performance through January 31, 2026. Costs incurred subsequent to November 2024 have not yet been subject to a fee as this portion of Phase 2 remains undefinitized and is subject to negotiation.Contract.

Reworded

Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 Compared with Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025

Reworded

Advanced technology costs were $18.9$10.8 million and $3.0$3.3 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, an increase of $15.9$7.5 million (or 530%227%). Advanced technology costs consist of American Centrifuge work and related expenses that are outside of our customer contracts in the Technical Solutions segment, including bid and proposal activities and work to improve our enrichment capability. The increase iswas primarily due to costs associated with our previously announced expansion projects at Oak Ridge and Piketon.

Added

Selling, General, and Administrative

Added

Selling, general, and administrative costs were $26.2 million and $13.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, an increase of $12.8 million (or 96%). The increase was primarily as a result of a non-cash stock compensation charge of $17.2 million due to the reclassification of certain Board RSU grants from equity to liability.

Reworded

Investment income was $17.0$16.3 million and $7.3$8.0 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, an increase of $9.7$8.3 million (or 133%104%). The Company’s investment income represents interest earned on operating cash, which is primarily held in money market accounts. The increase was due primarily to a higher cash balance driven by the proceeds from the issuance of the 0% Convertible Notes in August 2025 and proceeds from the issuance of Class A Common Stock under our ATM program in the second and fourth quarters of 2025.2025 and second quarter of 2026.

Showing the first 60 of 106 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

LEU insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 1 filing (1 insider, 1 trade date, 306 shares, about $62.3K). Net open-market shares: -306 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$62.3K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2026-08-11Tinelli Todd M
SVP, CFO & Treasurer
Grant/award 456— —456 SEC
2026-08-11Tinelli Todd M
SVP, CFO & Treasurer
Shares withheld for tax 206$189.19 $39.0K250 SEC
2026-06-26Williams Mikel H
Director
Shares withheld for tax 302— —52,234 SEC
2026-06-26Jonas Tina W
Director
Shares withheld for tax 293— —15,480 SEC
2026-06-26Madia William J
Director
Shares withheld for tax 345— —57,443 SEC
2026-06-26Donald Kirkland H
Director
Shares withheld for tax 295— —8,693 SEC
2026-06-26Rothrock Ray A.
Director
Shares withheld for tax 235— —2,680 SEC
2026-06-18Williams Mikel H
Director
Grant/award 757— —52,536 SEC
2026-06-18Rothrock Ray A.
Director
Grant/award 757— —2,915 SEC
2026-06-18Madia William J
Director
Grant/award 757— —57,788 SEC
2026-06-18Jonas Tina W
Director
Grant/award 757— —15,773 SEC
2026-06-18Donald Kirkland H
Director
Grant/award 757— —8,988 SEC
2026-05-11Tinelli Todd M
SVP, CFO & Treasurer
Open-market sale 306$203.55 $62.3K0 SEC
2026-04-21Brown Patrick Sidney
SVP, FIELD OPERATIONS
Grant/award 1,596— —2,841 SEC
2026-04-21Brown Patrick Sidney
SVP, FIELD OPERATIONS
Shares withheld for tax 389$191.55 $74.5K2,452 SEC

Well-known investors holding LEU (13F)

InvestorQuarterSharesReported value% of their 13FChange vs prior quarter
Millennium Management (Israel Englander) NOTE 2.250%11/02026-06-300$54.6M0.04%No change
Renaissance Technologies CL A2026-06-30280,482$47.1M0.06%Added 75%
Two Sigma Investments CL A2026-06-30235,301$39.5M0.03%Added 75%
Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) CL A2026-06-3052,524$8.8M0.01%Reduced 33%
D. E. Shaw & Co. CL A2026-06-3037,357$6.3M0.0%Reduced 86%
Bridgewater Associates CL A2026-06-3020,702$3.5M0.01%Added 12%
Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) CL A2026-06-3017,302$3.0M—Sold out
AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) CL A2026-06-306,747$1.1M0.0%Added 71%
Gotham Asset Management (Joel Greenblatt) CL A2026-06-305,387$904.3K0.0%Reduced 80%

13F reports are filed up to 45 days after quarter end and show long U.S. equity positions only; options positions are omitted here.

Coming soon: email alerts when LEU files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.