LINC 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Lincoln Educational Services Corp. · Nasdaq · Services-Educational Services · CIK 1286613 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “Among the requirements that we must satisfy is demonstrating to the DOE that we meet its criteria for financial responsibility and administrative capability, and, if we are unable to demonstrate such responsibility and capability, we could lose access to Title IV Program funding which would have a significant impact on our business and results of operations.”
New heading “As our industry is subject to significant federal and state regulations, changes in the executive branch of our federal government as a result of the outcome of elections or other events could result in further legislation, appropriations, executive orders, regulations and enforcement actions that could materially or adversely affect our business.”
New heading “While none of our institutions are currently provisionally certified, the DOE could provisionally certify one or more of our institutions in the future, which would make them more vulnerable to unfavorable DOE action and place additional regulatory burdens on their operations.”
Removed heading “If we fail to demonstrate “administrative capability” to the DOE, our business could suffer.”
Removed heading “The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Sweet v. Cardona, No. 3:19-cv-3674 (N.D. Cal.)) has approved a class action settlement that could result in the granting of all borrower defense applications submitted to the DOE concerning our institutions and, potentially, could lead to the DOE seeking recoupment from us of all loan amounts in the granted applications.”
Removed heading “If we or our eligible institutions do not meet the financial responsibility standards prescribed by the DOE, we may be required to post letters of credit or our eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs could be terminated or limited, which could significantly reduce our student population and revenues.”
Removed heading “All of our institutions are provisionally certified by the DOE, which may make them more vulnerable to unfavorable DOE action and place additional regulatory burdens on its operations.”
Removed heading “Changes in the executive branch of our federal government as a result of the outcome of elections or other events could result in further legislation, appropriations, executive orders, regulations and enforcement actions that could materially or adversely affect our business.”
Largest changes
“Because we operate in a highly regulated industry, we are subject to compliance reviews and claims of noncompliance and lawsuits by government agencies and third parties. We may be subject to further reviews related to, among other things, issues of noncompliance identified in recent audits and reviews related to our institutions’ compliance with Title IV Program requirements or related to liabilities for the discharge of loans to certain students who attended campuses of our institutions that are now closed. See Part I, Item 1. …”see in full comparison
“Because we operate in a highly regulated industry, we are subject to compliance reviews and claims of noncompliance and lawsuits by government agencies and third parties. We may be subject to further reviews related to, among other things, issues of noncompliance identified in recent audits and reviews related to our institutions’ compliance with Title IV Program requirements or related to liabilities for the discharge of loans to certain students who attended campuses of our institutions that are now closed. See Part I, Item 1. …”see in full comparison
“The DOE’s regulations prohibit an institution that participates in the Title IV Programs from engaging in substantial misrepresentation of the nature of its educational programs, financial charges, graduate employability or its relationship with the DOE. The DOE published final regulations on November 1, 2022 that, among other things, expanded the categories of conduct deemed to be a misrepresentation or substantial omission of fact and that also established new prohibitions on certain types of recruiting tactics and conduct that the DOE deems to be aggressive or deceptive. …”see in full comparison
The DOE’s Borrower Defense to Repayment regulations establish processes for borrowers to receive from the DOE a discharge of the obligation to repay certain Title IV Program loans based on certain acts or omissions by the institution or a coveredsee in full comparisonparty.party for which a loan was obtained. The regulations also establish processes for the DOE to seek recovery from the institution of the amount of discharged loans. The regulations regarding Borrower Defense to Repayment and regarding closed school loan discharges are extensive and generally make it easier for borrowers to obtain discharges of student loans and for the DOE to assess liabilities and other sanctions on institutions based on the loan discharges. The implementation and enforcement of these Borrower Defense to Repayment and closed school loan discharge regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Borrower Defense to Repayment Regulations” and “Business – Regulatory Environment – Closed School Loan Discharges.” As a result of class action litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Sweet v. Cardona, No. 3:19-cv-3674 (N.D. Cal.)) which has been settled, the DOE estimated that approximately 196,000 student loan borrowers who attended one of the schools identified in the litigation (including our institutions) would receive automatic loan discharges and that approximately 250,000 additional student loan borrowers who submitted borrower defense applications after the litigation commenced (which may include our institutions) would receive decisions within 36 months or else receive automatic student loan discharges. It is not possible at this time to predict whether the settlement will continue to be upheld, what additional actions the DOE might take as the settlement continues to be upheld, or whether the DOE or other agencies might take actions against the Company's institutions. It is possible that all claims by our students might be forgiven either affirmatively by the DOE or automatically under the settlement agreement. Such actions could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. We believe that the DOE already may have discharged some or all of the pending applications. See Part I, Item I. “Business – Regulatory Environment – Borrower Defense to Repayment Regulations.”
“The DOE’s regulations prohibit an institution that participates in the Title IV Programs from engaging in substantial misrepresentation of the nature of its educational programs, financial charges, graduate employability or its relationship with the DOE, which is broadly defined, and provide for prohibitions on certain types of recruiting tactics and conduct that the DOE deems to be aggressive or deceptive. See Part I, Item 1. …”see in full comparison
“The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Sweet v. Cardona, No. 3:19-cv-3674 (N.D. Cal.)) has approved a class action settlement that could result in the granting of all borrower defense applications submitted to the DOE concerning our institutions and, potentially, could lead to the DOE seeking recoupment from us of all loan amounts in the granted applications.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (93)
Investing in our Common Stock involves a high degree of risk. The risk factors described below and other information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K10-K, including our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes, are among the numerous risks faced by our Company and should be carefully considered before deciding to invest
in, sell or retain shares of our Common Stock. These are factors that, individually or in the aggregate, could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected and historical results and the risks and uncertainties described below are
not the only ones we face. Investors should understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all such risks and, as such, should not consider the following to be a complete discussion of all potential risks and uncertainties that may
affect the Company. Investors should consider carefully theAdditional risks andthat uncertaintiesmay describednot belowbe inpresently additionknown to otherus informationor containedthat inwe thisdo Annualnot Reportcurrently ondeem Formmaterial 10-K,may includingalso come to materially harm our Consolidated Financial Statementsbusiness and relatedoperations. notes.See “Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
OurThe for-profit
postsecondary education industry in which we operate is highly regulated by the
federal government and the state governments in which institutions operate as
well as by accrediting agencies and our
failure to comply with the resulting extensive regulatorylegal requirements applicable to
the our participation in Title IV Programs and our school operationsindustry could result in financial penalties, restrictions on our
operations and loss of external financial aid funding,funding and/or eligibility to
participate in Title IV Programs which could affect our revenues and impose
significant operating restrictions upon us.
OurThe highly
regulated industry isin highlywhich regulatedwe byoperate federalrequires andcompliance statewith governmentalextensive agencieslegal
requirements andthat by accrediting commissions. The various regulatory agencies applicable to our businessare periodically revise their requirementsrevised and modify
their interpretations of existingwhich requirementsare
continuously andevolving. restrictions.As Wesuch, we cannot predict with certainty how any of these regulatory requirements
will be applied or whether each of our schools will be able to comply with such revised requirementsthem in the
future. Given the complex nature of the regulationsrequirements and the fact that they are
subject to interpretation, it is reasonablepossible to conclude that in the conduct of our business, we may inadvertently violate such regulations.law. In
particular, the HEA and
DOE regulations specify extensive criteria and numerous standards
requirements that an institution must satisfy toin establishorder to participate in the Title
IV Programs. For a description of these federal, state,state and accrediting agency
criteria, see Part I, Item
1. “Business - Regulatory Environment.”
If we are found to have not satisfied the HEA or the DOE's requirements for Title IV Programs funding, one or more of our institutions, including its additional locations, could be limited in its access to, or
lose, Title IV Program funding, which could adversely affect our revenue, as we received approximately 82% of our revenue (calculated based on cash receipts) from Title IV Programs during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, and have a
significant impact on our business and results of operations. If we or any of our schools fail to comply with applicable federal, state,state or accrediting agency requirements, our regulators could take a variety of adverse actions against us, and
our schools could be subject to, among other things, (a) the loss of, or placement of material restrictions or conditions on (i) state licensure or accreditation, (ii) eligibility to participate in and receive funds under the Title IV Programs
Program funding or other federal or state financial assistance programs, or (iii) capacity to grant degrees, diplomas and certificates or (b) the imposition of liabilities or monetary penalties, or a requirement to provide a letter of credit or other financial
protection, any of which could have a material adverse effect on academic or operational initiatives, revenues or financial condition, and impose significant operating restrictions upon us. Any of these actions could have a significant impact on our business. If we are found not to have satisfied the HEA’s or the DOE’s requirements for Title IV Program funding, one or more of our institutions, including its additional locations, could be limited in its access to, or lose, Title IV Program funding, which could adversely affect our revenue. As we received approximately 85% of our revenue (calculated based on cash receipts) from Title IV Programs during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, loss of Title IV Program funding eligibility could adversely affect our revenue which would have a significant impact on our business and results of operations. See Part I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory
Environment – Compliance with Regulatory Standards and Effect of Regulatory Violations” and “Business – Regulatory Environment – Other Financial Assistance Programs.”
Among the requirements that we must satisfy is demonstrating to the DOE that we meet its criteria for financial responsibility and administrative capability, and, if we are unable to demonstrate such responsibility and capability, we could lose access to Title IV Program funding which would have a significant impact on our business and results of operations.
If we fail to demonstrate “administrative capability” to the DOE, our business could suffer.
DOE regulations specify extensive criteria that an institution must satisfy to establish that it has the requisite “financial responsibility and administrative capability” to participate in Title IV Programs, and the DOE recently published new regulations that expand the
number and scope of these criteria. For a description of these criteria, see Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Administrative Capability.”
IfOur we are found notinability to have satisfiedsatisfy the DOE’s “administrative capability” requirements,
criteria or to have otherwise failedfail to comply with one or more DOE requirements, one or
more of our institutions and its additional locations could be limited in
its
access to, or lose, Title IV Program funding. This could adversely affect our revenue, asAs we received approximately 82% 85%
of our revenue (calculated based on cash receipts) from Title IV Programs
during inthe 2024,fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. Loss of Title IV Program
funding could adversely affect our revenue, which would have a significant
impact impact
on our business and results of operations. The DOE has placed all of our institutions in provisional certification status based on findings in recent audits of the institutions’ Title IV compliance
that the DOE alleges identified deficiencies in regulations related to DOE regulations regarding an institutions’ level of administrative capability. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory
Environment – Regulation of Federal Student
Financial Aid Programs.”
As our industry is subject to significant federal and state regulations, changes in the executive branch of our federal government as a result of the outcome of elections or other events could result in further legislation, appropriations, executive orders, regulations and enforcement actions that could materially or adversely affect our business.
The composition of federal and state executive offices, executive agencies and legislatures that are subject to change based on the results of elections, appointments and other events may adversely impact our industry through constant changes in the regulatory environment resulting from the disparate views towards the for-profit education industry. See Part I. Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Scrutiny of the For-Profit Postsecondary Education Sector.” Any laws or other actions that are adopted that limit our or our students’ participation in Title IV Programs or in programs to provide funds for active duty service members and veterans or the amount of student financial aid for which our students are eligible, or any decreases in enrollment related to the regulatory activity concerning this sector, could have a material adverse effect on our academic or operational initiatives, cash flows, results of operations or financial condition.
Congress, the President and the DOE may make changes to the DOE or the laws and regulations applicable to, or reduce funding for, Title IV Programs, or may reduce or disrupt the funding for Title IV Programs or cause a federal government shutdown, which could reduce our student population, revenues and/or profit margin.
Congress periodically revises the HEA and other laws governing Title IV Programs and annually determines the funding level for each Title IV Program. We cannot predict what, if any, legislative or other actions will be taken or proposed by Congress in connection with the reauthorization of the HEA or other such activities of Congress. Congress also reviews and determines federal appropriations for Title IV Programs on an annual basis and can make changes in the laws affecting Title IV Programs in the annual appropriations bills and in other laws it enacts in the interim periods between HEA reauthorizations. Whether or not Congress will pass final legislation that comprehensively reauthorizes and amends the HEA or other laws affecting U.S. federal student aid and, if so, when, is currently not known. Moreover, if Congress fails to pass appropriations or other funding bills on a timely basis, it could result in a government shutdown until new appropriations or funding are approved and enacted. See Part I, Item 1. “Regulatory Environment – Congressional and Presidential Action.” Although agencies like the DOE have taken steps during past government shutdowns to maintain essential operations and reduce impact on affected parties, a future government shutdown could result in adverse impacts on us, our schools, and our students such as, for example, if the shutdown disrupts our ability to draw down Title IV Program federal student aid or other federal aid for our students, disrupts the operations of federal student aid processors, contact centers and websites, or delays our ability to obtain DOE approval of changes at one or more of our institutions or to obtain other needed services from the DOE. Because a significant percentage of our revenues is derived from Title IV Programs, any action by Congress, the President, or the DOE that significantly reduces or disrupts funding for Title IV Programs or that limits the ability of our schools, programs, or students to receive funding through such programs, that disrupts the operations of such programs, or that imposes new restrictions upon our business or operations could reduce our student enrollment and our revenues, increase our administrative costs, require us to arrange for alternative sources of financial aid for our students, and require us to modify our practices in order to fully comply with Title IV Program requirements.
Also, Congress, or the President, can take action to downsize or eliminate the DOE or transfer some or all of the DOE’s authority or responsibilities to another agency. See “Regulatory Environment – Congressional and Presidential Action.” We cannot predict whether, when, and to what extent the DOE may be downsized, eliminated or replaced and whether Congressional action and/or judicial action in response to lawsuits could impede efforts by the President and DOE to make such changes. However, recent and future changes at the DOE could result in delays and disruptions to Title IV Program funding at our schools or to other actions by the DOE related to our participation in Title IV Programs such as, but not limited to, granting approvals for school acquisitions, adding new programs to existing schools, or adding new school locations.
The DOE continues to engage in a process to establish new regulations that have increased, and may continue to increase, the number and scope of regulatory requirements applicable to our schools. See Part I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – Negotiated Rulemaking.” We cannot predict the scope, timing or likelihood of future actions and changes by Congress, the President or the DOE with respect to the operations and existence of the DOE or the laws and regulations applicable to and the funding for Title IV Programs. Moreover, we cannot predict the duration of any future government shutdowns or whether they could lead to disruptions in Title IV Programs or other federal student aid programs that could adversely impact us, our schools, and our students. If we cannot comply with the provisions of the HEA and the regulations of the DOE, as they may be revised, or with the terms of an executive order or other executive action, or if the cost of such compliance is excessive, or if funding is materially reduced, or if funding is materially reduced or disrupted by changes to Title IV Programs, our revenues or profit margin could be materially adversely affected.
Congress periodically revises the HEA and other laws governing Title IV Programs and annually determines the funding level for each Title IV Program. We cannot predict what, if any, legislative or other actions will be taken or proposed by
Congress in connection with the reauthorization of the HEA or other such activities of Congress, although Congress recently made a change to the 90/10 Rule that will make it harder for schools like ours that are subject to the rule to comply with
the rule. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Congressional Action.” Similarly, the President could issue executive orders or take other actions and the DOE could establish new regulations, that could make it more difficult
for our schools to operate and comply with applicable regulations. Moreover, Congress, or the President, could take action to downsize or eliminate the DOE or transfer some or all of the DOE’s authority or responsibilities to another agency or
to the States. Because a significant percentage of our revenues is derived from the Title IV Programs, any action by Congress, the President, or the DOE that significantly reduces funding for Title IV Programs or that limits the ability of our
schools, programs, or students to receive funding through such programs, that disrupts the operations of such programs, or that imposes new restrictions upon our business or operations could reduce our student enrollment and our revenues,
increase our administrative costs, require us to arrange for alternative sources of financial aid for our students, and require us to modify our practices in order to fully comply. In addition, current requirements for Title IV Program
participation may change or the present Title IV Programs could be replaced by other programs with materially different eligibility requirements. The potential for changes to the DOE or the Title IV Programs that may be adverse to us and other
for-profit schools like ours may increase as a result of changes in political leadership. The DOE continues to engage in a process to establish new regulations that have increased, and will continue to increase, the number and scope of
regulatory requirements applicable to our schools. See Part I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – Negotiated Rulemaking.” We cannot predict the scope, timing or likelihood of future actions and changes by Congress, the President or
the DOE with respect to the operations or existence of the DOE or the laws and regulations applicable to and the funding for the Title IV Programs. If we cannot comply with the provisions of the HEA and the regulations of the DOE, as they may be
revised, or with the terms of an executive order or other executive action, or if the cost of such compliance is excessive, or if funding is materially reduced, or if funding is materially reduced or disrupted by changes to Title IV Programs, our
revenues or profit margin could be materially adversely affected.
The DOE’s
Borrower Defense to Repayment regulations establish processes for borrowers to
receive from the DOE a discharge of the obligation to repay certain Title IV
Program loans based on certain acts or omissions by the institution or a
covered party.party for which a loan was obtained. The regulations also establish
processes for the DOE to seek recovery from the institution of the amount of
discharged loans. The regulations regarding Borrower Defense to Repayment and
regarding closed school loan discharges are
extensive and generally make it
easier for borrowers to obtain discharges of student loans and for the DOE to
assess liabilities and other sanctions on institutions based on the loan
discharges. The implementation and enforcement of these
Borrower Defense to
Repayment and closed school loan discharge regulations could have a material
adverse effect on our business and results of operations. See Part I, Item 1.
“Business - Regulatory Environment – Borrower Defense to Repayment
Regulations”
and “Business – Regulatory Environment – Closed School Loan Discharges.” As a
result of class action litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of California (Sweet v. Cardona, No. 3:19-cv-3674 (N.D. Cal.)) which
has been settled, the DOE estimated that approximately 196,000 student loan
borrowers who attended one of the schools identified in the litigation
(including our institutions) would receive automatic loan discharges and that
approximately 250,000 additional student loan borrowers who submitted borrower
defense applications after the litigation commenced (which may include our
institutions) would receive decisions within 36 months or else receive
automatic student loan discharges. It is not possible at this time to predict
whether the settlement will continue to be upheld, what additional actions the
DOE might take as the settlement continues to be upheld, or whether the DOE or
other agencies might take actions against the Company's institutions. It is
possible that all claims by our students might be forgiven either affirmatively
by the DOE or automatically under the settlement agreement. Such actions could
have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. We
believe that the DOE already may have discharged some or all of the pending
applications. See Part I, Item I. “Business – Regulatory Environment – Borrower
Defense to Repayment Regulations.”
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Sweet v. Cardona, No. 3:19-cv-3674 (N.D. Cal.)) has approved a class action settlement that could result in the granting of all borrower defense applications submitted to the DOE concerning our institutions and,
potentially, could lead to the DOE seeking recoupment from us of all loan amounts in the granted applications.
On June 22, 2022, the DOE and the plaintiff student loan borrowers in a class action against the DOE initiated on June 25, 2019 in the U.S. District
Court for the Northern District of California (Sweet v. Cardona, No. 3:19-cv-3674 (N.D. Cal.)) announced a proposed settlement agreement to resolve claims
that the DOE had failed to timely decide Borrower Defense to Repayment applications submitted to the DOE. The proposed settlement included three categories of relief for student loan borrowers. First, the DOE would agree to discharge loans and
refund prior loan payments to class members with loan debt associated with an institution on the list included in the settlement (which includes Lincoln institutions). The class action plaintiffs and the DOE stated that the DOE had determined
that attendance at one of the listed institutions justifies presumptive relief allegedly based on strong indicia regarding substantial misconduct by the institutions, whether credibly alleged or in some instances proven, and the purportedly high
rate of class members with applications related to the listed schools. Second, the proposed settlement included new procedures for the DOE to resolve pending borrower defense claims associated with other schools not on the list. Third, for any
student loan borrower who submitted a borrower defense application after June 22, 2022 and before the final approval of the settlement, the proposed settlement would require the DOE to review the applications under the DOE’s 2016 regulatory
standards and issue decisions within 36 months, or else the applications would be discharged in full. On November 16, 2022, the federal district court approved the settlement as proposed and the DOE began implementing the settlement relief while
Lincoln and other parties appealed the settlement’s final approval to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. On November 5, 2024, the Ninth Circuit upheld the settlement on appeal. One or more schools are expected to continue to
appeal the final approval of the settlement, but Lincoln does not intend to continue participating in the appeal. As a result of this final approval, the DOE has estimated that approximately 196,000 student loan borrowers who attended one of the
listed schools (including Lincoln institutions) will receive automatic student loan discharges; that another approximately 100,000 student loan borrowers who attended other schools not on the list would receive decisions under new procedures; and
that approximately 250,000 student loan borrowers who submitted borrower defense applications between June 22, 2022 and November 16, 2022 would receive decisions under the DOE’s 2016 regulatory standards within 36 months or else receive automatic
student loan discharges.
It is not possible at this time to predict whether the settlement will continue to be upheld on appeal, what additional actions the DOE might take as
the settlement continues to be upheld on appeal, or whether the DOE or other agencies might take actions against Lincoln institutions. Such actions could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. We believe the
DOE already may have discharged some or all of the pending applications. See Part I, Item I. “Business – Regulatory Environment – Borrower Defense to Repayment Regulations.”
TheOur failure to comply with the DOE’s Gainfulgainful Employmentemployment and accountability regulations could haveresult ain significantadditional impactdisclosure on our businessrequirements and resultspossible loss of operations.Title IV Program eligibility.
On October 10, 2023, theThe DOE
published final gainful employment and financial value transparency regulations, regulations
which had a general effective date of July 1, 2024 and which establishestablished rules for annually
evaluating each of our educational
programs based on the calculation of debt-to-earnings rates (an annual
debt-to-earnings rateratio that compares the median annual earnings and a median
discretionary debt-to-earningsearnings rateof graduates who received federal financial aid to the
median annual payment on loan debt borrowed for the program) and an earnings
premium measuretest that compares the median annual earnings of graduates from a
program that received federal financial aid to an “earnings threshold” based on
a antypical evaluationhigh ofschool mediangraduate annual
earningsin their state (or in some cases nationally) and
within a certain age range in the labor force under complex regulatory formulas
outlined in the regulations. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory
Environment – Gainful Employment.Employment and Accountability Metrics.” Earlier this
year, proposed regulations were published intended to implement the
accountability metric imposed by the OBBB Act, which conditions Direct Loan
eligibility on whether program completers earn more than working adults with
only a high school diploma or GED. The proposed regulations would amend the
gainful employment and financial value transparency regulations. If one or more
of our educational programs were to yield debt-to-earnings ratesratios or an
earnings premium measure that do not comply with regulatory benchmarks for two
of three consecutive years, we would lose Title IV Program eligibility for each
of the impacted educational programs. The regulations will also require us to
provide warnings
to current and prospective students for programs in danger of
losing of Title IV Program eligibility (which could deter prospective students
from enrolling and current students from continuing their respective programs).
and Theto regulationsprovide alsoto include
provisionsthe for providingDOE certifications and reporting data and to theprovide DOEto
students and providingcertain required student disclosures related to gainful employment.
The implementation of the gainful employment and new accountability metric regulations may substantially increase our administrative burdens and could impact our program offerings, student enrollment, and retention as it could result in the loss of our students’ access to Title IV Program funds for the affected programs, which would have a significant impact on the rate at which students enroll in our programs and on our business and results of operations.
The regulations include gainful employment rates and measures that will be based in part on data that is not readily accessible to us and other institutions, which make it difficult for us to predict with certainty how our educational programs
will perform under the new gainful employment benchmarks and the extent to which certain programs could become ineligible for Title IV participation. The DOE released performance data at the time it published the proposed regulations that
calculates rates for each school’s program while acknowledging that the methodology used to produce the calculations differs from the methodology in the proposed regulations due to limitations in data availability. Because we do not have access
to all of the data that will ultimately be used under the regulations to evaluate our programs and the DOE has not made this data available, we cannot predict whether, or the extent to which, our programs could fail to comply with the new gainful
employment benchmarks. Moreover, we do not have control over some of the factors that could impact the rates and measures for our programs which will limit our ability to eliminate or mitigate the impact of the regulations on us and our
educational programs. The DOE announced at the time it released the final gainful employment regulations that the first official outcome rates will be published in early 2025 and that programs that fail the same gainful employment metric in the
first two years the rates are issued will become ineligible in 2026 The implementation of new gainful employment regulations could require us to eliminate or modify certain educational programs, could result in the loss of our students’ access to Title IV Program funds for the affected programs, and could have
a significant impact on the rate at which students enroll in our programs and on our business and results of operations.
The DOE hasperiodically changedamends its regulations,
regulations and mayissues makenew other changes in the future,regulations in a manner which could require us to
incur additional costs in connection with our administration of Title IV
Programs, affect our
ability to remain eligible to participate in Title IV
Programs, impose restrictions on our participation in Title IV Programs, affect
the rate at which students enroll in our programs, or otherwise have a
significant impact on our business and
results of operations.
The DOE periodically issues new
regulations and guidance that can have an adverse effect on our institutions.guidance. We cannot predict the timing and content of any new
regulations or guidance that the DOE may seek to impose or whether and to what
extent the DOE may issue new regulations and guidance that could adversely
impact for-profit postsecondary schools including our institutions. The DOE
recently published new regulations on a variety of topicstopics. withIt aalso generalrecently effective date of July 1, 2024 and
other regulations with a general effective date of July 1, 2026 and could engageengaged in additionaltwo negotiated
rulemaking processes that resulted in a consensus among the futurerulemaking
committees thaton couldproposed result in new regulations that could adversely impact institutions including our institutions.regulations. See Part
I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory
Environment – Negotiated Rulemaking.”
We cannot predict how the DOE would will
interpret and enforce current or future regulations or how these regulations, or any regulations that, may arise out of a negotiated rulemaking process or any other regulations that DOE may promulgate, may
impact our schools’ participation in Title IV Programs; however, failure to
comply with current or future regulations could have a material adverse effect
on our schools’ business and results of operations, and the broad sweep of the
recent rules and the rules that the
DOE is currently developing may, in the
future, require our schools to submit a letter of credit based on expanded standards
of financial responsibility.
If we or our eligible institutions do not meet the financial responsibility standards prescribed by the DOE, we may be required to post letters of credit or our eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs could
be terminated or limited, which could significantly reduce our student population and revenues.
To participate in Title IV Programs, an eligible institution must satisfy specific measures of financial responsibility prescribed by the DOE or post a letter of credit in favor of the DOE and possibly accept other conditions on its
participation in Title IV Programs. The DOE published new regulations that established expanded standards of financial responsibility, which could result in a requirement that we submit to the DOE a substantial letter of credit or other form of
financial protection in an amount determined by the DOE, and be subject to other conditions and requirements, based on any one of an extensive list of triggering circumstances. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Financial
Responsibility Standards.” Any obligation to post one or more letters of credit would increase our costs of regulatory compliance. Our inability to obtain a required letter of credit or limitations on, or termination or revocation of, our
participation in Title IV Programs could limit our students’ access to various government-sponsored student financial aid programs, which could significantly reduce our student population and revenues.
ProgrammaticProgram accreditation is the process through which specific programs are reviewed and approved by industry- and program-specific accrediting entities. Although programmaticprogram accreditation is not generally necessary for Title IV Program
eligibility, such accreditation may be required to allow students to sit for certain licensure exams or to work in a particular profession or career or to meet other requirements. Failure to obtain or maintain such programmaticprogram accreditation may
lead to a decline in enrollments in such programs.
OurUnder the DOE’s 90/10 Rule, our
institutions would lose their eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs
if the percentage of their revenues derived from those programs exceeds 90%,
which could reduce our student population and revenues.
An institution that derives more than 90% of its total revenue from Title IV Programs and other “federal funds that are disbursed or delivered to or on behalf of a student to be used attend the institution” (its “90/10 Rule percentage”) for two consecutive fiscal years becomes immediately ineligible to participate in Title IV Programs and may not reapply for eligibility until the end of at least two fiscal years. An institution with such revenues that exceed 90% of total revenue for a single fiscal year will be placed in provisional certification status and may be subject to other enforcement measures. If an institution violated the 90/10 Rule and became ineligible to participate in Title IV Programs but continued to disburse Title IV Program funds, the DOE would require the institution to repay all Title IV Program funds received by the institution after the effective date of the loss of eligibility. A loss of eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs for any of our institutions would have a significant impact on the rate at which our students enroll in our programs and on our business and results of operations. The 90/10 Rule previously considered whether an institution derived more than 90% of its total revenue only from Title IV Programs rather than in combination with certain other federal funding. Under the current 90/10 Rule, our institutions are now required to limit the combined amount of Title IV Program funds and applicable “federal funds” revenue (as defined by the DOE) in a fiscal year to no more than 90% in a fiscal year as calculated under the rule. Consequently, the current 90/10 Rule has increased and may continue to increase the 90/10 Rule calculations at our institutions.
A proprietary institution that derives more than 90% of its total revenue from Title IV Programs for two consecutive fiscal years becomes immediately ineligible to participate in Title IV Programs and may not reapply for eligibility until the
end of at least two fiscal years. An institution with revenues exceeding 90% for a single fiscal year will be placed in provisional certification status and may be subject to other enforcement measures.
In March 2021, the ARPA amended the 90/10 Rule by treating other “federal funds that are disbursed or delivered to or on behalf of a student to be used to attend such institution” in the same way as Title IV funds are currently treated in the
90/10 Rule calculation. See Part I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – 90/10 Rule.” The ARPA states that the amendments to the 90/10 Rule apply to institutional fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2023 and are subject to the
HEA’s negotiated rulemaking process. The DOE published new final 90/10 Rule regulations on October 28, 2022 with a general effective date of July 1, 2023. The 90/10 Rule regulations could have a materiallymaterial adverse effect on us and other schools
like ours. See Part I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – 90/10 Rule” and “Business – Regulatory Environment – Negotiated Rulemaking.”. We cannot be certain that the changes we make to our operations in the future to address the new
90/10 Rule regulations will succeed in maintaining our institutions’ 90/10 Rule percentages below required levels or that the changes will not materially impact our business operations, revenues, and operating costs. It also is possible that Congress or the DOE could amend the 90/10 Rule in the future to lower the 90% threshold, change the calculation methodology, or make other changes to the 90/10 Rule that could make it more difficult for our institutions to comply
with the 90/10 Rule. If any of our institutions loses eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs, that loss would also adversely affect our students’ access to various government-sponsored student financial aid programs, and would have a
significant impact on the rate at which our students enroll in our programs and on our business and results of operations.
Our
institutions would lose their eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs
if their former students defaulteddefault on repayment of their federal student loans in excess of
specified levels, which could reduce our student
population and revenues.
An institution may lose its eligibility to participate in some or all Title IV Programs if the rates at which the institution's current and former students default on their federal student loans exceed specified percentages. We expect borrower defaults to increase substantially during periods after the expiration of a temporary suspension of repayment obligations and interest accruals on federal student loans during the COVID-19 pandemic, which we expect will result in higher cohort default rates in the future particularly if borrowers do not successfully resume timely repayment of their federal student loans. We cannot predict how high our cohort default rates will increase in the future as a result of the expiration of the temporary suspension or whether our efforts to assist students and prevent student defaults will be successful. See Part I, Item
1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Student Loan Defaults.” If former students defaulteddefault on repayment of their federal student loans in excess of specified levels, our institutions would lose eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs,
Programs. This would also adversely affect our students’ access to various government-sponsored student financial aid programs,programs andwhich would have a significant impact on the rate at which our students enroll in our programs and on our business and results of
operations.
An institution participating in Title IV Programs must correctly calculate the amount of unearned Title IV Program funds that have been credited to students who withdraw from their educational programs before completing them and must return
those unearned funds in a timely manner, generally within 45 days of such student’s withdrawal. If the unearned funds are not properly calculated and timely returned, we may have to post a letter of credit in favor of the DOE or may be otherwise
sanctioned by the DOE, which could increase our cost of regulatory compliance and adversely affect our results of operations. Based upon the findings of an annual Title IV Program compliance audit of our Columbia and Iselin institutions, we are
required to maintain a letter of credit in the amount of $600,020 to the DOE. More recently, on January 3, 2025, the DOE issued amendments to the regulations on the requirements for institutions to return unearned Title IV funds to students who
withdraw from their educational programs before completing them. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Return of Title IV Program Funds.”
The DOE’s regulations prohibit an institution that participates in the Title IV Programs from engaging in substantial misrepresentation of the nature of its educational programs, financial charges, graduate employability or its relationship
with the DOE. The DOE published final regulations on November 1, 2022 that, among other things, expanded the categories of conduct deemed to be a misrepresentation or substantial omission of fact and that also
established new prohibitions on certain types of recruiting tactics and conduct that the DOE deems to be aggressive or deceptive. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Substantial Misrepresentation.” If the DOE
determines that one of our institutions has engaged in substantial misrepresentation or other prohibited conduct, the DOE may impose sanctions or other conditions upon the institution including, but not limited to, initiating an action to fine
the institution or limit, suspend, or terminate its eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs and may seek to discharge students’ loans and impose liabilities upon the institution. The regulations also could result in further scrutiny of
marketing and recruiting practices by institutions like our schools and could increase the chances of the DOE finding practices to be noncompliant and imposing sanctions based on the alleged noncompliance.
All of our institutions are provisionally certified by the DOE, which may make them more vulnerable to unfavorable DOE action and place additional regulatory burdens on its operations.
All of our institutions are provisionally certified by the DOE. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Regulation of Federal Student Financial Aid Programs.” The DOE typically places an institution in provisional
certification status following a change in ownership resulting in a change of control, and may provisionally certify an institution for other reasons including, but not limited to, failure to comply with certain standards of administrative
capability or financial responsibility. During the time when an institution is provisionally certified, it may be subject to adverse action with fewer due process rights than those afforded to other institutions. In addition, an institution that
is provisionally certified must apply for and receive approval from the DOE for certain substantive changes including, but not limited to, the establishment of an additional location, an increase in the level of academic offerings or the addition
of new programs. The DOE published final regulations with a general effective date of July 1, 2024 that, among other issues, establish rules to authorize additional conditions and restrictions on provisionally certified institutions and expand
existing regulations regarding administrative capability and financial responsibility. See Part I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – Regulation of Federal Student Financial Aid Programs.” Any adverse action by the DOE or increased
regulatory burdens as a result of the provisional certification status of one of our institutions could have a material adverse effect on enrollments and our revenues, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
Because we operate in a highly regulated industry, we are subject to compliance reviews and claims of noncompliance and lawsuits by government agencies and third parties. We may be subject to further reviews related to, among other things,
issues of noncompliance identified in recent audits and reviews related to our institutions’ compliance with Title IV Program requirements or related to liabilities for the discharge of loans to certain students who attended campuses of our
institutions that are now closed. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Compliance with Regulatory Standards and Effect of Regulatory Violations.” If the results of these reviews or proceedings are unfavorable to us, or if we
are unable to defend successfully against third-party lawsuits or claims, we may be required to pay money damages or be subject to fines, limitations on the operations of our business, loss of federal and state funding, injunctions or other
penalties. Even if we adequately address issues raised by an agency review or successfully defend a third-party lawsuit or claim, we may have to divert significant financial and management resources from our ongoing business operations to address
issues raised by those reviews or defend those lawsuits or claims. Certain of our institutions are subject to ongoing reviews and proceedings. See Part I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – Accreditation,” “Regulatory Environment –
Other Financial Assistance Programs,” “Regulatory Environment – Borrower Defense to Repayment,” “Regulatory Environment - Compliance with Regulatory Standards and Effect of Regulatory Violations,” and “Regulatory Environment - Scrutiny of the For-Profit Postsecondary Education Sector.”
In addition, any actions by Congress or by states that significantly reduce funding for Title IV Programs or other student financial assistance programs, or the ability of our students to participate in these programs, or establish different or more stringent requirements for our schools to participate in those programs, could have a significant impact on our student population, results of operations and cash flows.
An institution participating in Title IV Programs must correctly calculate the amount of unearned Title IV Program funds that have been credited to students who withdraw from their educational programs before completing them and must return those unearned funds in a timely manner, generally within 45 days of such student’s withdrawal. If the unearned funds are not properly calculated and timely returned, we may have to post a letter of credit in favor of the DOE or may be otherwise sanctioned by the DOE, which could increase our cost of regulatory compliance and adversely affect our results of operations. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Return of Title IV Program Funds.”
The DOE’s regulations prohibit an institution that participates in the Title IV Programs from engaging in substantial misrepresentation of the nature of its educational programs, financial charges, graduate employability or its relationship with the DOE, which is broadly defined, and provide for prohibitions on certain types of recruiting tactics and conduct that the DOE deems to be aggressive or deceptive. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Substantial Misrepresentation.” If the DOE determines that one of our institutions has engaged in substantial misrepresentation or other prohibited conduct, the DOE may impose sanctions or other conditions upon the institution including, but not limited to, initiating an action to fine the institution or limit, suspend, or terminate its eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs and may seek to discharge students’ loans and impose liabilities upon the institution. The regulations also could result in further scrutiny of marketing and recruiting practices by institutions like our schools and could increase the chances of the DOE finding practices to be noncompliant and imposing sanctions based on the alleged noncompliance.
While none of our institutions are currently provisionally certified, the DOE could provisionally certify one or more of our institutions in the future, which would make them more vulnerable to unfavorable DOE action and place additional regulatory burdens on their operations.
The DOE typically places an institution on provisional certification status following a change in ownership resulting in a change of control, and may provisionally certify an institution for other reasons including, but not limited to, failure to comply with certain standards of administrative capability or financial responsibility. During the time when an institution is provisionally certified, it may be subject to adverse action with fewer due process rights than those afforded to other institutions. In addition, an institution that is provisionally certified must apply for and receive approval from the DOE for certain substantive changes including, but not limited to, the establishment of an additional location, an increase in the level of academic offerings or the addition of new programs. Our institutions were provisionally certified by the DOE in the past, but the DOE does not provisionally certify our institutions in their current program participation agreements. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Regulation of Federal Student Financial Aid Programs.” The DOE’s current regulations establish rules that, among other things, authorize additional conditions and restrictions on provisionally certified institutions and expand existing regulations regarding administrative capability and financial responsibility. See Part I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – Regulation of Federal Student Financial Aid Programs.” Any adverse action by the DOE or increased regulatory burdens as a result of the DOE placing one or more of our institutions on provisional certification status in the future could have a material adverse effect on enrollments and our revenues, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
Because we operate in a highly regulated industry, we are subject to compliance reviews and claims of noncompliance and lawsuits by government agencies and third parties. We may be subject to further reviews related to, among other things, issues of noncompliance identified in recent audits and reviews related to our institutions’ compliance with Title IV Program requirements or related to liabilities for the discharge of loans to certain students who attended campuses of our institutions that are now closed. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Compliance with Regulatory Standards and Effect of Regulatory Violations.” If the results of these reviews or proceedings are unfavorable to us, or if we are unable to defend successfully against third-party lawsuits or claims, we may be required to pay money damages or be subject to fines, limitations on the operations of our business, loss of federal and state funding, injunctions or other penalties. Even if we adequately address issues raised by an agency review or successfully defend a third-party lawsuit or claim, we may have to divert significant financial and management resources from our ongoing business operations to address issues raised by those reviews or defend those lawsuits or claims. Certain of our institutions are subject to ongoing reviews and proceedings. See Part I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – Accreditation,” “Regulatory Environment – Other Financial Assistance Programs,” “Regulatory Environment – Borrower Defense to Repayment,” “Regulatory Environment - Compliance with Regulatory Standards and Effect of Regulatory Violations,” and “Regulatory Environment – Consumer Protection Laws and Scrutiny of the For-Profit Post-secondary Education Sector.”
Changes in the executive branch of our federal government as a result of the outcome of elections or other events could result in further legislation, appropriations, executive orders, regulations and enforcement
actions that could materially or adversely affect our business.
Our industry is subject to an intensive ongoing federal and state regulatory environment that affects our industry. The composition of federal and state executive offices, executive agencies and legislatures that are subject to change based on
the results of elections, appointments and other events, may adversely impact our industry through constant changes in that regulatory environment resulting from the disparate views towards the for-profit education industry. See Part I, Item 1.
“Business – Regulatory Environment – Scrutiny of the For-Profit Postsecondary Education Sector.” Any laws or other actions that are adopted that limit our or our students’ participation in Title IV Programs or in programs to provide funds for
active duty service members and veterans or the amount of student financial aid for which our students are eligible, or any decreases in enrollment related to the congressional activity concerning this sector, could have a material adverse effect
on our academic or operational initiatives, cash flows, results of operations, or financial condition.
Adverse publicity arising from scrutiny of us or other for-profit postsecondarypost-secondary schools may negatively affect us or our schools.
In recent years, Congress, the DOE, state legislatures, accrediting agencies, the CFPB, the FTC, state agencies and attorneys general and the media have scrutinized the for-profit postsecondarypost-secondary education sector. See Part I,
Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – Consumer Protection Laws and Scrutiny of the For-Profit PostsecondaryPost-Secondary Education Sector.” Adverse publicity regarding any past, pending, or future investigations, claims, settlements, and/or actions against us or other
for-profit postsecondarypost-secondary schools could negatively affect our reputation, student enrollment levels, revenue, profit, and/or the market price of our Common Stock. Unresolved investigations, claims, and actions, or adverse resolutions or
settlements thereof, could also result in additional inquiries, administrative actions or lawsuits, increased scrutiny, the loss or withholding of accreditation, state licensure, or eligibility to participate in the Title IV Programs or other
financial assistance programs, and/or the imposition of other sanctions by federal, state, or accrediting agencies which, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flows and result in the imposition of significant restrictions on us and our ability to operate.
Our strategic
plans for future expansion are based, in part, on our ability to open new
schools as additional locations of our existing institutions, to add new
educational programs at our existing schools, and take
into account the
applicable approval requirements of the DOE and our other regulatory agencies
for adding new locations and educational programs. See Part I, Item 1.
“Business - Regulatory Environment - Opening Additional Schools and Adding
Educational Programs”. Our institutions are provisionally certified and required to obtain prior DOE approval of new locations and of new educational programs. If an institution
erroneously determines
that thata new location or an educational program is eligible for purposes of Title
IV Programs, the institution would likely be liable for repayment of Title IV
Program funds provided to students in that educational program. The failure to
obtain applicable approvals from the DOE and other applicable regulators
without delay or material condition in connection with the addition of a new
location or educational program could have a significant impact on our business
and results of
operations.
Public health pandemics, epidemics or outbreaks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, and the resulting containment measures to be taken in response to such events have caused and may in the future cause economic and financial disruptions globally.
The extent to which any rapidly spreading contagious illness may impact our business and operations will depend on a variety of factors beyond our control, including the actions of governments, businesses and other enterprises in response
thereto, the effectiveness of those actions, and vaccine availability, distribution and adoption, all of which cannot be predicted with any level of certainty. We believe that the spread of such illnesses could adversely impact our business and
operations, including as a result of workforce limitations and travel restrictions and related government actions. If a significant percentage of our workforce is unable to work, including because of illness or travel or government restrictions
in connection with pandemics or disease outbreaks, our operations and enrollment may be negatively impacted. Finally, state and federal regulators, including the DOE, are augmenting existing regulatory processes, waiving others, and overseeing
various emergency relief and aid programs. It is highly uncertain how long such regulatory accommodations will continue, or how long and in what amount emergency relief and aid funds will continue to be available. We also cannot predict the types
of conditions that may be attached to participation in emergency relief and aid programs, and whether and to what extent compliance with such conditions will be monitored and enforced. If further outbreaks occur and students elect to take a
leave of absence, withdraw, or do not make up the required in person labs on a timely basis, our future revenues could be impacted.
The postsecondarypost-secondary education market is highly competitive. We compete for students and faculty with traditional public and private two-year and four-year colleges and universities and other proprietary schools, many of
which have greater financial resources than we do. Some traditional public and private colleges and universities, as well as other private career-oriented schools, offer programs that may be perceived by students to be similar to ours. Most
public institutions are able to charge lower tuition than our schools, due in part to government subsidies and other financial resources not available to for-profit schools. Some of our competitors also have substantially greater financial and
other resources than we have which may, among other things, allow our competitors to secure strategic relationships with some or all of the companies with which we have existing relationships or develop other high profile strategic relationships,
or devote more resources to expanding their programs and their school network, or provide greater financing alternatives to their students, all of which could affect the success of our marketing programs. In addition, some of our competitors have
a larger network of schools and campuses than we do, enabling them to recruit students more effectively from a wider geographic area. This strong competition could adversely affect our business.
We may be required to reduce tuition or increase spending in response to competition in order to retain or attract students or pursue new market opportunities. As a result, our market share, revenues and operating
margin may be decreased. We cannot be surecertain thatof weour will be ableability to compete successfully against current or future competitors or that the competitive pressures we face will not adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
Our financial performance depends in part on our abilityeffectiveness toat continue to developdeveloping awareness and acceptance of our programs among high school graduates and working adults looking to return to school.
The awareness of our programs among high school graduates and working adults looking to return to school is critical to the continued acceptance and growth of our programs. OurIneffectiveness inabilityat todeveloping continue to developsuch awareness
of our programs could reduce our enrollments and impair our ability to increase our revenues or maintain profitability. The following are some of the factors that could prevent us from successfully marketing our programs:
student dissatisfaction with our programs and services;
diminished access to high school student populations;
our failure to maintain or expand our brand or other factors related to our marketing or advertising practices; and our inability to maintain relationships with employers in the automotive, diesel, skilled trades and IT services industries.
Our students and
their families have benefitted from historic lows on student loan interest
rates in prior years. Much of the financing that our students receive is tied
to floating interest rates. Recently,More recently, student loan
interest rates have
been higher, making borrowing for education more expensive. Increases in
interest rates result in a corresponding increase in the cost to our existing
and prospective students of financing their education, which could result
in a
reduction in the number of students attending our schools and could adversely
affect our results of operations and revenues. Higher interest rates could also
contribute to higher default rates with respect to our students' repayment of
their their
educational loans. Higher default rates may in turn adversely impact our
eligibility for Title IV Program participation or the willingness of private
lenders to make private loan programs available to students who attend our
schools, which could
result in a reduction in our student population.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS”
New heading “The following generally discusses 2025 and 2024 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2025 and 2024. Discussion of historical items and year-to-year comparisons between 2024 and 2023 that are not included in this discussion can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.”
New heading “Business Strategy”
New heading “Recent and Planned Campus Openings”
New heading “Year Ended December 31, 2025, Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2024”
Removed heading “Property Sale Agreement - Nashville, Tennessee Campus”
Removed heading “Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022”
Removed heading “Consolidated Results of Operations”
Removed heading “Year Ended December 31, 2024 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2023”
Removed heading “Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022”
Removed heading “Corporate and Other”
Largest changes
“Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets. Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets was zero and $4.2 million for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The impairment in the prior year was driven by the sale the Nashville, Tennessee property on June 8, 2023. The result of the sale created a change in the trajectory of the fair value of the Nashville, Tennessee operations, and as such, the Company recorded a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of $3.8 million relating to goodwill and an additional $0.4 million impairment relating to long-lived assets.”see in full comparison
“Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets. Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets was $4.2 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 driven by the sale the Nashville, Tennessee property on June 8, 2023. The result of the sale created a change in the trajectory of the fair value of the Nashville, Tennessee operations, and as such, the Company recorded a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of $3.8 million relating to goodwill and an additional $0.4 million impairment relating to long-lived assets.”see in full comparison
“For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, as a result of the Company’s annual test of goodwill and long-lived assets, it was determined that there was sufficient evidence to conclude that a $1.0 million impairment existed. The impairment was the result of an assessment of the current market value, as compared to the current carrying value of the assets. Approximately $0.6 million of the Company’s ROU asset was impaired in addition to $0.4 million of long-lived assets.”see in full comparison
“On June 8, 2023, the Company consummated the sale of its Nashville, Tennessee property (see Part II. Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplemental Data” - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 8 Real Estate Transactions”). The result of the sale created a change in the trajectory of the fair value of the Nashville, Tennessee operations and as such, the Company recorded a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of $3.8 million relating to goodwill.”see in full comparison
“The following generally discusses 2025 and 2024 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2025 and 2024. Discussion of historical items and year-to-year comparisons between 2024 and 2023 that are not included in this discussion can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.”see in full comparison
“During the year ended December 31, 2022, there were no impairments related to goodwill.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (136)
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following generally discusses 2025 and 2024 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2025 and 2024. Discussion of historical items and year-to-year comparisons between 2024 and 2023 that are not included in this discussion can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Business Activities— Lincoln Educational Services Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, the
“Company”, “we”, “our”, and “us”, as applicable) provide diversified career-oriented postsecondary education to recent high school graduates and working adults. The Company, which currently operates 2122 campuses in 12 states, has entered
into leases for two new campuses: one in Houston, Texas, with programs expected to begin in the second half of 2025, and one in Hicksville, New York, with programs expected to begin by the end of 2026.2026, Lincolnand Educationalone Services
Corporationin Rowlett, Texas, a northern suburb of Dallas, where the lease commenced in the fourth quarter of 2025, and programs are expected to begin in the first quarter of 2027. The Company offers programs in skilled tradestrades, (whichautomotive, includehealth Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (“HVAC”), welding and computerized numerical control and electrical and electronic systems technology, among other programs),
automotive technology, healthcare services (which include nursing, dental assistant and medical assistant, among other programs) and hospitality servicessciences and information technology (which include culinary and aesthetics and information
technology programs).technology. The schools operate under the brands Lincoln Technical Institute, Lincoln College of Technology and Nashville Auto Diesel College.
Most of the Company’s campuses serve major metropolitan markets and each typically offers courses in multiple areas of study. Five of theour campuses are destination schools, which attract students from across the United States and, in some
cases, from abroad. The Company’s other campuses primarily attract students from their local communities and surrounding areas. All of theour campuses are nationally accredited and are eligible to participate in federal financial aid programs
administered by the U.S. Department of Education (the “DOE”) and applicable state education agencies and accrediting commissions which allow students to apply for and access federal student loans as well as other forms of financial aid. The
Company was incorporated in New Jersey in 2003 as the successor-in-interest to various acquired schools including Lincoln Technical Institute, Inc. which opened its first campus in Newark, New Jersey in 1946.
The Company’s business is organized into two reportable business segments: Campus Operations and Transitional. The Company manages its business, evaluates performance and allocates resources based on twothese reportable business segments, Campus Operations and Transitional:segments.
Campus Operations - The Campus Operations segment includes campuses that are continuing in operation and contribute to the Company’s core operations and performance. All of theour campuses
continuing in operation are classified in this segment. The majorityAll of theour campuses offer programs across various areas of study.
Transitional – TheHistorically, the Company classified certain campuses as part
of a Transitional segment referswhen tosuch campuses that
arewere marked for closureclosure, andheld are currently being taught-out, in addition to campuses that are held-for-salefor
sale, or sold.taught out. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had no campuses
classified as Transitional. As of December 31, 2024, the net assets for the
Summerlin, Las Vegas campus were classified as held for sale, with operating
results classified within the Transitional segment. The sale of the Summerlin
campus was consummated effective January 1, 2025. In addition, the Company closed the Somerville, Massachusetts campus in the prior year. It was fully taught-out as of
December 31, 2023. This campus is classified in the Transitional segment in the prior year’s statement of operations.
We believe that we provide our students with the highest qualityhigh-quality career-oriented training available for our areas of study in our markets thereby serving students, local employers and their communities. The
skills gap continues to expand as talent retires faster than new employees are hired and as the need for education and training increases in all careers with the accelerating pace of technological change.
The majority of
students enrolled at our schools rely on funds received under various
government-sponsored student financial aid programs to pay a substantial
portion of their tuition and other
education-related expenses. The largest of
these programs are Title IV Programs which represented approximately 82%, 81%,85% and 74%82% of our revenue on a cash basis during fiscal years 2025 and 2024, respectively, while the remainder iswas primarily derived from state grants
and cash payments
made by students during fiscal years 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively.students. The HEA requires institutions to use the
cash basis of accounting when determining its compliance with the 90/10 Rule. See
Part I, Item 1. “Business -
Regulatory Environment.”
our internal extension of credit is provided to students only after all other funding resources have been exhausted; thus, by the time this funding is available, students have completed approximately two-thirds of their curriculum and are more likely to graduate and, as a consequence, more likely to pay outstanding tuition amounts;
funding for students who interrupt their education is typically covered by Title IV Program funds as long as they have been properly packaged for financial aid.
Educational services and facilities. Major components of educational services and facilities expenses include faculty compensation and benefits, expenses of books and tools, facility rent, maintenance, utilities, depreciation and amortization of property and equipment used in the provision of education services and other costs directly associated with teaching our programs excluding student services which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
Selling, general and administrative. Selling, general and administrative expenses include compensation and benefits of employees who are not directly associated with the provision of educational services (such as executive management and school management, finance and central accounting, legal, human resources and business development), marketing and student enrollment expenses (including compensation and benefits of personnel employed in sales and marketing and student admissions), costs to develop curriculum, costs of professional services, bad debt expense, rent for our corporate headquarters, depreciation and amortization of property and equipment that is not used in the provision of educational services and other costs that are incidental to our operations. Selling, general and administrative expenses also includes the cost of all student services including financial aid and career services. All marketing and student enrollment expenses are recognized in the period incurred.
On November 11, 2024, the Company entered into an agreement with DVMD LLS (IntelliTec College) for the sale of the Summerlin, Las Vegas (“Euphoria”) campus. As a result of the intended sale, the Company recorded the carrying amount of the net assets totaling $1.2 million as held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The net assets related to the Summerlin, Las Vegas campus consisted of $2.1 million in assets and $0.9 million in liabilities. The sale of the Summerlin campus was consummated effective January 1, 2025.
On September 28,
2023, the Company purchased a 90,000 square foot property located at 311
Veterans Highway, Levittown, Pennsylvania for approximately $10.2 million and
subsequently on January 30, 2024 entered
into a sale-leaseback transaction for
the same property. As of December 31, 2023, this property was classified as held-for-sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. During the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, the Company
invested has invested
approximately $11.7$13.6 million in capital investments.
Property Sale Agreement - Nashville, Tennessee Campus
On September 24, 2021, Nashville Acquisition, L.L.C., a subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Contract for the Purchase of Real Estate (the “Nashville Contract”) to sell the nearly
16-acre property located at 524 Gallatin Avenue, Nashville, Tennessee 37206, at which the Company operates its Nashville campus, to SLC Development, LLC, a subsidiary of Southern Land Company (“SLC”).
On June 8, 2023, the Company closed on the sale of its Nashville, Tennessee property to East Nashville Owner, LLC, an affiliate of SLC, for approximately $33.8 million pursuant to the Nashville Contract. The
net proceeds from the Nashville sale, net of closing costs, are available for working capital, acquisitions, other strategic initiatives, and general corporate purposes. In connection with the sale, the parties entered into a lease agreement
allowing Lincoln to continue to occupy the campus and operate it on a rent-free basis for a period of 15 months plus options to extend the lease for up to three consecutive 30-day terms at $150,000 per extension term. The carrying value of
the campus is approximately $4.5 million and the estimated fair value of the rent for the 15-month rent-free period was approximately $2.3 million at the consummation of the lease. As of December 31, 2024, the total rent free period has been
fully expensed.
Our discussions of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America,America or GAAP.("GAAP"). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions, including those
related to revenue recognition, bad debts, goodwill and impairment of long-lived assets and income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The critical accounting policies discussed herein are not intended to be a
comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP and does not result in significant management judgment in the application of such
principles. We believe that the following accounting policies are most critical to us in that they represent the primary areas where financial information is subject to the application of management's estimates, assumptions and judgment in
the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Revenue recognition. Substantially all of our revenues are considered to be revenues from contracts with students. We determine standalone selling price based on the price at which the distinct services or goods are sold separately. The related accounts receivable balances are recorded in our balance sheets as student accounts receivable. We do not have significant revenue recognized from performance obligations that were satisfied in prior periods, and we do not have any transaction price allocated to unsatisfied performance obligations other than in our unearned tuition. We record revenue for students who withdraw from our schools only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur. In addition, to reduce the amount of outstanding accounts receivable balances due from our students, the Company employs a continuous collection effort. Unearned tuition represents contract liabilities primarily related to our tuition revenue. We have elected not to provide disclosure about transaction prices allocated to unsatisfied performance obligations if original contract durations are less than one-year, or if we have the right to consideration from a student in an amount that corresponds directly with the value provided to the student for performance obligations completed to date in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, Revenue from Contract with Customers. We have assessed the costs incurred to obtain a contract with a student and determined them to be immaterial.
Allowance for Credit Losses. OnWe Januarydefine 1,student 2023,receivables theas Companya adoptedportfolio Accountingsegment Standardsunder Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. As a result of the adoption, the Company has revised the way in which it calculates reserves on outstanding student
accounts receivable balances. Details considered by management in the estimate include the following:
Our bad debt expense as a percentage of revenues for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2024, 2023,2025, and 20222024 was 12.9%, 11.0%,11.2% and 10.0%,12.9%, respectively. A 1% increase in our bad debt expense as a percentage of
revenues for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2024, 2023,2025, and 20222024, would have resulted in an increase in bad debt expense of $5.2 million and $4.4 million, $3.8 million, and $3.5 million, respectively.
Goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of
purchase price over the fair value of tangible net assets and identifiable
intangible assets of the businesses
acquired. LincolnThe Company tests goodwill for
impairment annually, in the fourth quarter of each year, unless there are
events or changes in circumstances that indicate an impairment may have
occurred. Impairment may result from deterioration in
performance, adverse
market conditions, adverse changes in laws or regulations, the restriction of
activities associated with the acquired business, and/or a variety of other
circumstances. If we determine that impairment has occurred, we
record a
write-down of the carrying value and charge the impairment as an operating
expense in the period the determination is made.
When we perform our annual goodwill impairment assessment we have the option to perform a qualitative assessment based on a number of factors impacting our reporting units (Step 0).units. When a qualitative assessment is performed, a number of
factors are evaluated to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Our qualitative assessment is subjective. It includes a review
of macroeconomic and industry factors, review of financial and non-financial performance measures, including projected student starts and assessment of adverse events that may negatively impact a reporting units carrying value. Adverse
events would include, but are not limited to, difficulty in accessing capital, a greater competitive environment, decline in market-dependent multiples or metrics, regulatory or political developments, change in key personnel, strategy, or
customers, or litigation. If we conclude based on our qualitative review that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value, we proceed with a quantitative impairment test.
When we perform our quantitative impairment test we believe that the most critical assumptions and estimates in determining the estimated fair value of our reporting units include, but are not limited to, future tuition revenues, operating costs, working capital changes, capital expenditures and a discount rate. The assumptions used in determining our expected future cash flows consider various factors such as historical operating trends particularly in student enrollment and pricing and long-term operating strategies and initiatives.
For the yearyears ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, there were no impairments related to goodwill.
On June 8, 2023, the Company consummated the sale of its Nashville, Tennessee property (see Part II. Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplemental Data” - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 8 Real
Estate Transactions”). The result of the sale created a change in the trajectory of the fair value of the Nashville, Tennessee operations and as such, the Company recorded a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of $3.8 million relating to
goodwill.
During the year ended December 31, 2022, there were no impairments related to goodwill.
For the yearyears ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, there were no impairments related to long-lived assets.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, as a result of the Nashville sale discussed above, the Company also recorded a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of $0.4 million relating to long-lived assets.
On December 31, 2022, as a result of impairment testing, it was determined that there was a long-lived asset impairment of $1.0 million. The impairment was the result of an assessment of the current market value,
as compared to the carrying value of the assets.
We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2024, 2023,2025, and 2022,2024, we did not record any interest and penalties expense associated with
uncertain tax positions, as we do not have any uncertain tax positions.
Business Strategy
Key elements of our business strategy include:
Expand Geographically. We plan to open new campuses and enter new markets using existing resources or acquisitions. We opened a new campus in Houston, Texas in August 2025, and have signed leases for new campuses in Hicksville, New York, where programs are expected to begin by the end of 2026, and Rowlett, Texas, which is expected to open in the first quarter of 2027.
● Replicate Programs and Expand Existing Areas of Study. We are expanding our program portfolio by introducing in-demand offerings at existing campuses and replicating proven in-demand offerings across locations.
● Increase Operating Efficiency. We aim to improve margins and scalability by centralizing operations, standardizing curricula, and leveraging technology such as artificial intelligence to streamline campus functions.
● Maximize Utilization of Existing Facilities. We focus on increasing facility usage through enrollment growth, new programs, and industry partnerships.
● Expand Teaching Platform. We are transitioning to a hybrid teaching platform, Lincoln 10.0, the implementation of which has been substantially completed and is expected to be finalized by the end of 2026 for all planned programs except for Licensed Practical Nursing which will happen in 2027, to offer greater flexibility, efficiency, and value to students.
Recent and Planned Campus Openings
Revenue. Revenue increased $62.0 million,$78.2, or 16.4%17.8% to $440.1$518.2 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20242025 from $378.1$440.1 million in the prior year.
Revenue growth was drivenprimarily bydue severalto factorsa including an 11.5%15.2% increase in average student population, driven in part by beginning the year with 7.1%, or 882 more students than in the prior year and student start growth up 15.2% over the
prior year. Included in the increase over the prior year was $9.6 million of revenue generated from the recently opened East Point, Georgia campus.population.
Educational services and facilities expense. Our educationalEducational services and facilities expense increased $19.5$23.6 million, or 12.0%13.0% to $181.8$205.4 million for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 20242025 from $162.3$181.8 million in the prior year. The increase over the prior year includes approximately $4.3 million in preopening costs for the new Houston, Texas campus, which is expected to begin classes in the
second half of 2025, costsreduction related to the relocationTransitional ofsegment, eachwhich ofincurred theexpenses Nashville,only Tennesseein prior year. On a comparable basis, educational services and Levittown,facilities Pennsylvaniaexpense campuses,increased whichby are$27.9 expected to open in the first half of 2025 and the second half of 2025, respectively, and investments to
implement and expand new programs at existing campuses. Additional costs of $4.8 million are included in the current year as a result of the new East Point, Georgia campus that opened during the first quarter of 2024.million.
The primary driver of the increase was higher costs associated with supporting a larger student population. The remaining increase was attributable to higher depreciation expense, largely resulting from capital investments to support our growth initiatives.
Instructional expenses and books and tools expense increased $8.8 million, primarily resulting from costs associated with an increased student population.
Facilities and Depreciation expense increased approximately $4.0 million, primarily driven by additional assets placed in service resulting from increased investments in capital expenditures in the current year.
Partially offsetting these costs was a $2.4 million decrease in expense related to campuses included in the Transitional segment.
Educational services and facilities expense, asAs a percentage of revenue, instructional expenses decreased to 41.3%19.0% from 42.9%20.6% for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20242025, and 2023,2024, respectively. TheSimilarly, decreaseeducational services and facilities expense as a percentage of revenue declined to 39.6% from 41.3% in the prior year wascomparable most
notableperiod. inThose theimprovements instructionaldemonstrate expenses,continued whichmargin demonstratesexpansion anas increasewe inscale operational efficiencies year-over-year.operations.
Selling, general and administrative expense. Our selling, general and administrative expense increased $34.7 million, or 16.6% to $243.8 million for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, from $209.1 million in the prior year. The increase over the prior year includes approximately $0.6 million in preopening costs for the new Houston, Texas campus, which is expected to begin classes in the
second half of 2025, costs related to the relocation of each of the Nashville, Tennessee and Levittown, Pennsylvania campuses, which are expected to open in the first half of 2025 and the second half of 2025, respectively, and investments to
implement and expand new programs at existing campuses. Additional costs of $5.4 million are included in the current year as a result of the new East Point, Georgia campus that opened during the first quarter of 2024.
Administrative costs increased $20.5 million, driven primarily by additional salaries expense due to increased personnel combined with merit
increases and an increase in the provision for credit losses largely driven by revenue growth. Partially offsetting these costs were decreases in stock compensation expense, as a result of expense recorded related to the number of awards
expected to vest at December 31, 2023.
Marketing investments increased $2.7 million, while the cost per start over the prior year remained relatively flat demonstrating continued effectiveness per marketing dollars spent. Additional investments in
marketing year-over-year have helped contribute to the 15.2% start growth.
Sales and student services increased $7.1 million, primarily driven by increased personnel to continue to help drive student start growth and program expansions.
Partially offsetting these costs was a $1.7 million decrease in expense related to campuses included in the Transitional segment.
Selling, general and administrative expense, as a percentage of revenue, increased slightly to 55.4% from 55.3% for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
Loss on sale of assets. Loss on sale of assets was $2.1 million compared to a gain on sale of assets of $30.9 million for the fiscal years ended December
31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The current year loss was primarily driven by the sale of the Summerlin, Las Vegas campus, while the gain in the prior year resulted from the sale of the Company’s Nashville, Tennessee property during the
second quarter of 2023. Net proceeds from the sale were approximately $33.3 million.
Gain on insurance proceeds. Gain on insurance proceeds for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $2.8 million relating to hail damage at one of our
campuses.
Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets. Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets was zero and $4.2
million for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The impairment in the prior year was driven by the sale the Nashville, Tennessee property on June 8, 2023. The result of the sale created a change in the
trajectory of the fair value of the Nashville, Tennessee operations, and as such, the Company recorded a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of $3.8 million relating to goodwill and an additional $0.4 million impairment relating to long-lived
assets.
Net interest expense / income. Net interest expense was $0.5 million compared to net interest income of $2.3 million for the fiscal years ended December
31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Interest expense in the current year was primarily driven by the addition of two additional finance leases.
Income taxes. Our income tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $4.8 million, or 32.8% of pre-tax income compared to $9.6 million, or 27.1% of pre-tax net income
in the prior year. The increase in the effective tax rate was mainly due to lower pre-tax income, reduced discrete tax item benefit and tax return reconciliation from estimate to actuals.
Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022
Consolidated Results of Operations
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A of our Form 10-K and those contained in our previously filed Form 10-Qs, which could affect our business, financial condition, or operating results. The risks we describe in our periodic reports are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, or operating results. During the quarter ended June 30, 2026, the Company did not become aware of any specific new and additional risk factors that were not previously disclosed.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (1)
In addition to the other information set forth in this Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A of our Form 10-K and those contained in our previously filed Form 10-Qs, which could affect our business, financial condition, or operating results. The risks we describe in our periodic reports are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, or
operating results. ForDuring the quarter ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company is
did not become aware of any specific new and additional risk factors that were
not previously disclosed.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “* 2025 figures include 2,764 student starts on July 1, 2025, to align with comparable student start activity in the current year during the last week of June 2026, returning to our typical start schedule.”
New heading “Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2025”
New heading “Consolidated Results of Operations”
New heading “* 2025 figures include 2,764 student starts on July 1, 2025, to align with comparable student start activity in the current year during the last week of June 2026, returning to our typical start schedule.”
New heading “Corporate and Other”
New heading “Melrose Park Property Acquisition”
Removed heading “Borrower Defense to Repayment Regulations”
Largest changes
“The regulations outlining the new accountability framework, known as the Student Tuition and Transparency System (“STATS”) and Earnings Accountability rule, address several other topics including, for example, the complex rules for the earnings calculations and premiums, data and calculation appeals, warning and disclosure requirements for programs that fail the earnings test and that are at risk of losing eligibility, sanctions for programs that fail the earnings tests, informational reporting requirements, requirements for DOE to publicly disclose certain institutional data, requirements …”see in full comparison
“We cannot predict how our educational programs will perform under the new metrics, but our failure to comply with the new regulations, including the failure of some of our educational programs to comply with the earnings tests, and the potential loss of Direct Loan and potentially all Title IV eligibility for impacted programs, could have a significant impact on our business and results of operations. …”see in full comparison
“The AHEAD Committee reached a consensus on two sets of proposed regulations on December 12, 2025, and January 9, 2026, respectively. The first set of proposed regulations implements the new Workforce Pell program authorized by the OBBB Act. …”see in full comparison
“We cannot predict the timing and scope of any regulations or guidance the DOE might issue on these or other topics, but new regulations or guidance on these or other topics could increase the possibility that our schools could be subject to additional reporting requirements, additional oversight by DOE and accrediting agencies, and potential liabilities and sanctions such as letter of credit requirements, and potential loss of Title IV eligibility if our efforts to modify our operations to comply with any new requirements are unsuccessful which could have a significant impact on our business …”see in full comparison
“* 2025 figures include 2,764 student starts on July 1, 2025, to align with comparable student start activity in the current year during the last week of June 2026, returning to our typical start schedule.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (67)
This discussion may contain forward-looking statements,statements that are based on management's current expectations, estimates and projections about our business and operations. Our actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated and expressed in such forward-looking statementsstatements, of operations thatwhich are subject to certain risks and uncertainties posed by many factors and events that could cause our actual business, prospects, and results of operations to differ materially from those that may be anticipated by such forward-looking statements. Such statements may be identified by the use of words such as “expect,” “estimate,” “assume,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “forecast,” “outlook,” “plan,” “project,” or similar words and include, without limitation, statements relating to future enrollment, revenues, revenues per student, earnings growth, operating expenses, capital expenditures, and the effect of pandemics and its ultimate effect on the Company’s business and results. These statements are based on the Company’s current expectations and are subject to a number of assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Additional factors that could cause or contribute to differences between our actual results and those anticipated include, but are not limited to, those described in the “Risk Factors” section of our Form 10-K and in our other filings with the SEC. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to revise any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances that may subsequently arise. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this Form 10-Q and in our other reports filed with the SEC that advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business.
The Company’s business is organized into two reportable business segments: Campus Operations; and Transitional. The Campus Operations segment includes campuses that are continuing in operation and contribute to the Company’s core operations and performance. The Transitional segment refers to campuses that have been marked for closure and are being taught out. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026 no campuses were classified in the Transitional segment.
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “CompanyCompany,”, “wewe,”, “ourour,”, and “usus,”, as applicable) provide diversified career-oriented postsecondary education to recent high school graduates and working adults. The Company, which currently operates 22 campuses in 12 states, recently entered into leases for twothree new campuses: one in Hicksville, New York, with programs expected to begin by the end of 2026, and2026; one in Rowlett, Texas, a northern suburb of Dallas, where the lease commenced in the fourth quarter of 2025, andwith programs are expected to begin in the first quarter of 2027; and one in Suitland, Maryland, located in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area with programs expected to begin in the fourth quarter of 2027. The Company offers programs in skilled trades, automotive, health sciences and information technology. The schools operate under the brands Lincoln Technical Institute, Lincoln College of TechnologyTechnology, and Nashville Auto Diesel College.
Most of the Company’s campuses serve major metropolitan markets and each typically offers courses in multiple areas of study. Five of our campuses are destination schools, which attract students from across the United States and, in some cases, from abroad. The Company’s other campuses primarily attract students from their local communities and surrounding areas. All of our campuses are nationally accredited and are eligible to participate in federal financial aid programs administered by the U.S. Department of Education (the "DOE”) and applicable state education agencies and accrediting commissionscommissions, which allow students to apply for and access federal student loans as well as other forms of financial aid. The Company was incorporated in New Jersey in 2003,2003 as the successor-in-interest to various acquired schools including Lincoln Technical Institute, Inc.Inc., which opened its first campus in Newark, New Jersey in 1946.
Expand Geographically. We plan to open new campuses and enter new markets using existing resources or acquisitions. We opened a new campus in Houston, Texas in August 2025, and have signed leases for new campuses in Hicksville, New York, where programs are expected to begin by the end of 2026, and2026; Rowlett, Texas, which is expected to open in the first quarter of 2027, and Suitland, Maryland, with programs expected to begin in the fourth quarter of 2027. We continue to evaluate opportunities to expand our footprint in markets that support our long-term growth objectives.
Expand Teaching Platform. We are transitioning to a hybrid teaching platform, Lincoln 10.0, the implementation of which has been substantially completed and is expected to be finalized by the end of 2026 for all planned programs, except for our Licensed Practical Nurse program which should be completed by the end of 2027. This platform is designed to provide greater flexibility, efficiency, and value to students, while supporting a more scalable and standardized academic delivery model.
Results of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026
Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 Compared to Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025
Revenue. Revenue increased $26.5$26.1 million, or 22.5%22.4% to $144.0$142.6 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, from $117.5$116.5 million in the prior year comparable period. Revenue growth was primarily due to a 18.2%14.5% increase in average student population driven by 19.5% start growth,population, with the remainder attributable to tuition increases.
* 2025 figures include 2,764 student starts on July 1, 2025, to align with comparable student start activity in the current year during the last week of June 2026, returning to our typical start schedule.
Educational services and facilities expense. Educational services and facilities expense increased by $11.0$12.8 million, or 23.2%,27.4%, to $58.4$59.6 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $47.4$46.8 million for the sameprior periodyear incomparable 2025.period. This includes a $2.9 million increase in costs related to our new campuses in Houston, Hicksville, and Rowlett.
The increase was
primarily driven by costs associated with a larger student population.population as well as higher books and tools expense primarily due to the timing of program starts. The
remaining increase was attributable to $3.9$3.1 million in higher depreciation
expense, including $0.8 million related to new campuses, largely resulting from
capital investments to support our growth initiatives.
Selling, general and administrative expense. Selling, general and administrative expense increased by $12.2 million, or 18.3% to $79.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $66.9 million for the same period in 2025. This includes a $1.9 million increase in costs related to our new campuses in Houston, Hicksville, and Rowlett.
Selling,
generalEducational services and administrativefacilities expenses continued to declineexpense as a percentage of
revenue increased to 55.0%41.8% forfrom 40.2% in the threeprior monthsyear endedcomparable March 31, 2026, compared to 56.9%
for the same period in 2025.period.
Selling, general and administrative expense. Selling, general and administrative expense increased $12.6 million, or 18.8% to $79.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $67.1 million in the prior year comparable period. This includes a $2.1 million increase in costs related to our new campuses in Houston, Hicksville, and Rowlett.
The increase was primarily driven by a larger student population, higher sales and marketing expense, and an increased provision for credit losses.
Administrative expenses increased $5.1 million, or 17.7%, primarily driven by costs associated with enrollment growth, due to increased student population, and growth initiatives.
Student services expense increased $1.1 million or 17.9%, driven by continued investments in staffing and support infrastructure to serve a growing student base.
Sales and marketing expense increased by $4.2$5.9 million, or 21.3%,31.1%, including $1.2 million related to our new campuses, resultingdue fromto plannedhigher investmentsstudent andacquisition the timing of the marketing activities.costs.
Selling, general and administrative expenses continued to decline as a percentage of revenue, at 55.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to 57.6% for the same period in 2025.
Provision for credit losses. While the provision increased inby absolute$2.9 terms,million, it declinedwas slightly lower as a percentage of revenue fromat 10.1%11.2% compared to 9.5%11.3% year-over-yearin reflectingthe continuingprior efficiencies from our financial aid processes and stronger collections.year.
Net interest expense. Net interest expense was $0.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, relatively consistent with the prior year comparable period.
Income taxes. Income tax provision was $1.2$0.3 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, representing an effective tax rate of 22.2%13.9% of pre-tax income, compared to $0.9 millionan income tax provision of $0.5 million and an effective tax rate of 31.2%25.1% infor the prior year comparable period. The lower effective tax rate in the current period was primarily due to a discrete tax benefit related to restricted stock vesting.
This category includes unallocated expenses incurred on behalf of the entire Company. Corporate and other expenses were $21.3$18.2 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, compared to $18.3$16.4 million in the prior year comparable period. The increase was primarily driven by higher salaries and benefits due to workforce expansion to support a larger student population and tothe executeexecution of our growth initiatives.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2025
Consolidated Results of Operations
Revenue. Revenue increased $52.5 million, or 22.4% to $286.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, from $234.0 million in the prior year comparable period. Revenue growth was primarily due to a 16.3% increase in average student population, with the remainder attributable to tuition increases.
* 2025 figures include 2,764 student starts on July 1, 2025, to align with comparable student start activity in the current year during the last week of June 2026, returning to our typical start schedule.
Educational services and facilities expense. Educational services and facilities expense increased by $23.8 million, or 25.3%, to $118.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $94.2 million for the prior year comparable period. This includes a $5.7 million increase in costs related to our new campuses in Houston, Hicksville, and Rowlett.
The primary driver of the increase was attributable to higher costs associated with supporting a larger student population. The remaining increase was attributable to higher depreciation expense, largely resulting from capital investments to support our growth initiatives.
Educational services and facilities expense as a percentage of revenue increased to 41.2% from 40.3% in the prior year comparable period.
Selling, general and administrative expense. Selling, general and administrative expense increased $24.8 million, or 18.5%, to $158.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $134.0 million for the prior year comparable period. This includes a $4.0 million increase in costs related to our new campuses in Houston, Hicksville, and Rowlett.
Selling, general and administrative expenses continued to decline as a percentage of revenue to 55.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to 57.3% for the same period in 2025.
Sales and marketing expense increased by $10.1 million, or 26.1%, including $2.4 million related to our new campuses, due to higher student acquisition costs.
Provision for credit losses. While the provision increased in absolute terms, it declined as a percentage of revenue from 10.7% to 10.4% year-over-year reflecting continuing efficiencies from our financial aid processes and stronger collections.
Net interest expense. Net interest expense was $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to net interest expense of $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025, primarily driven by higher interest expense on borrowings.
Income taxes. Income tax provision was $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, representing an effective tax rate of 19.8% of pre-tax income, compared to an income tax provision of $1.4 million and an effective tax rate of 28.6% in the prior year comparable period.
We evaluate performance based on operating results. Adjustments to reconcile segment results with consolidated results are included in the caption “Corporate,” which primarily includes unallocated corporate activity.
Corporate and Other
This category includes unallocated expenses incurred on behalf of the entire Company. Corporate and other expenses were $39.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $34.7 million in the prior year comparable period. The increase was primarily driven by higher salaries and benefits to support a larger student population and the execution of our growth initiatives.
Our primary capital requirements are for maintenance and expansion of our facilities and the development of new programs. Our principal source of liquidity has been cash provided by operating activities. The following chart summarizes the principal elements of our cash flow for each of the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, and 2025:
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026,
the Company had $16.7$44.2 million in cash and cash equivalents, compared to
$28.7 $16.7 million in cash and cash equivalents as of MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The change in
cash position from the prior year comparable period was primarily driven by
higher net cash provided by operating activities, along with increased capitalnet expendituresborrowings dueunder tothe campusCompany's expansion,financing arrangements, partially offset by
higher cashcontinued inflowscapital fromexpenditures operatingrelated activities.to campus expansion.
Operating cash flow resultsis generated primarily from cash received from our students, offset by changes in working capital demands. Working capital can vary at any point in time based on several factors including seasonality, timing of cash receipts and payments and vendor payment terms.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $4.6 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026,2026 was $26.7 million, compared to net cash used in operating activities of $8.4$8.1 million in the prior year comparable period. The increase in cash position wasperiod, primarily driven by favorable changes in working capitalcapital, depreciation and amortization, and the provision for credit losses, as well as higher net income.
Net cash used in investing activities was $14.6$29.1 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026,2026 compared to $19.6$45.8 million in the prior year comparable periodperiod, primarily drivenrelated by higherto capital expenditures associated with growth initiatives.
Capital
expenditures for the threesix months ended June 30, 2026 were $14.6$29.1 million compared to $19.9$46.3 million
in the prior year comparable period. The decrease resulted from a shift in
the timing of planned
capital expenditures which includes the buildout for the new Houston, Texas
Rowlett, Texas and Hicksville, New York campuses. In addition, we continue to
invest to expand programs at existing campuses whichthat demonstrate high market
demand and successful student outcomes. We expect to fund future capital
expenditures with cash generated from operating activities andactivities, cash on hand.hand, and utilization of the credit facility.
Net cash usedprovided in
by financing activities for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026,2026 was $1.8
$18.1 million, compared to $2.6$11.3 million in the prior year comparable period. The decrease in cash used wasperiod, primarily due to higher
an increase in net borrowings in the current period, partially offset by higher cash outflows
related to net share settlementsettlements offor equity-based compensation.
The Company maintains a revolving credit facility to support working capital and general corporate purposes. In April 2026, the Company entered into an amended and restated credit agreement, which increased total borrowing capacity from $60.0 million to $125.0 million and extended the maturity of the Facilitycredit facility from March 7, 2028 to April 11, 2031.
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company had $5.0$26.0 million outstanding under the Facility,credit which has now been repaid in connection with the replacement of the Facility with the Amended and Restated Facility.facility. For additional information regarding the terms of the Company’s credit facility, see Note 7, Long-Term Debt.
Melrose Park Property Acquisition
On July 7, 2026, the Company completed the acquisition of our Melrose Park, Illinois campus building, funded primarily through a mortgage loan, converting the location from a leased to an owned facility. See Note 13, Subsequent Events, to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion. We do not expect this transaction to have a material impact on our future results of operations.
Current portion of Long-Term Debt, Long-Term Debt and Lease Commitments. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company had $5.0$26.0 million in debt outstanding under the Facility.revolving Wecredit leasefacility. The Company leases offices, educational facilities and various items of equipment for varying periods through the year 2045 at basic annual rental rates (excluding taxes, insurance, and other expenses under certain leases).
As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company had outstanding loan principal commitments to our active students of $59.2$62.1 million. These are institutional loans, and no cash is advanced to students. The full loan amount is not guaranteed unless the student completes the program. The institutional loans are considered commitments because the students are required to fund their education using these funds and they are not reported on our financial statements.
In 2025, the DOE announced its intention to establish two negotiated rulemaking committees.committees: Thethe Reimagining and Improving Student Education (RISE) Committee wouldand considerthe Access through Demand-driven Workforce Pell (AHEAD) Committee. The RISE Committee considered changes to the federal student loan programs and the Accountability in Higher EducationEducation, and Accessthe through Demand-driven Workforce Pell (AHEAD) Committee would considerconsidered changes to institutional and programmatic accountability, the Pell Grant Program, and other changes to the Title IV Programs. This rulemaking iswas necessary to implement recent statutory changes to the Title IV and HEA programs included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act ("OBBB Act") as well as to propose other changes. See 10-K “Regulatory Environment – Negotiated Rulemaking” and “Regulatory Environment – Gainful Employment and Accountability.”
The proposed RISE regulations were subject to a public notice and comment period, which ended March 2, 2026, and the DOE published the final version of the regulations on May 1, 2026, with a general effective date of July 1, 2026. Among other topics, the new regulations place a $20,000 annual limit and a $65,000 aggregate limit on PLUS loans that parents may borrow for undergraduate programs and impose a requirement to prorate loans to students attending on a less than full-time basis. We are evaluating these and other new limits and cannot currently predict the extent to which these new limits may impact our schools, programs, enrollments, and revenues, but the reduction in availability of funding could impact the ability of some of our prospective students to enroll and finance their education without access to loans in excess of the new loan limits.
The AHEAD Committee reached a consensus on two sets of proposed regulations on December 12, 2025, and January 9, 2026, respectively. The first set of proposed regulations implements the new Workforce Pell program authorized by the OBBB Act. See 10-K at “Regulatory Environment – Negotiated Rulemaking.” Under these regulations, short-term workforce programs (as defined in the regulations) will be eligible to disburse Pell Grants if they meet various requirements such as applicable program length requirements, certain limitations on outsourcing instruction to ineligible providers, and obtaining requisite DOE and state approval in the state in which the institution is located.
The second set of proposed regulations would establish new uniform accountability requirements applicable to all educational programs across all education sectors. See 10-K at “Regulatory Environment – Negotiated Rulemaking” and “Regulatory Environment – Gainful Employment and Accountability.” The DOE published the regulations in final form on July 1, 2026. The regulations eliminate the “debt-to-earnings” measures under the gainful employment regulations. Instead, the regulations establish and describe an earnings premium framework for undergraduate certificate and degree programs that would compare graduate earnings to those of holders of high school diplomas and for graduate programs that would compare graduate earnings to those of bachelor’s degree holders. Under the framework described in the regulations, an educational program would lose access to the Direct Loan program if it fails to achieve a positive earnings premium for two out of three consecutive years.
The regulations outlining the new accountability framework, known as the Student Tuition and Transparency System (“STATS”) and Earnings Accountability rule, address several other topics including, for example, the complex rules for the earnings calculations and premiums, data and calculation appeals, warning and disclosure requirements for programs that fail the earnings test and that are at risk of losing eligibility, sanctions for programs that fail the earnings tests, informational reporting requirements, requirements for DOE to publicly disclose certain institutional data, requirements for institutions to certify program compliance, and provisional certification requirements for institutions with failing programs exceeding new administrative capability thresholds. The regulations have a general effective date of July 1, 2027, with some portions taking effect on August 31, 2026. The first earnings test calculations are expected to occur in early 2027, and July 1, 2028, is expected to be the first date on which a program could fail the earnings test for two consecutive years.
We cannot predict how our educational programs will perform under the new metrics, but our failure to comply with the new regulations, including the failure of some of our educational programs to comply with the earnings tests, and the potential loss of Direct Loan and potentially all Title IV eligibility for impacted programs, could have a significant impact on our business and results of operations. We cannot predict whether the DOE could publish amended regulations in the future under current or future leadership that make the accountability regulations stricter or seek to reinstitute the old gainful employment requirements. We also cannot predict the outcome or impact of any litigation that might seek to challenge the legality and enforceability of the final regulations.
The proposed RISE regulations were subject to a public notice and comment period, which ended March 2, 2026. The DOE is expected to publish a final version of the regulations with an anticipated effective date of July 1, 2026. The AHEAD Committee reached a consensus on two sets of proposed regulations on December 12, 2025, and January 9, 2026, respectively. The first set of proposed regulations would implement the new Workforce Pell program authorized by the OBBB Act. See 10-K at “Regulatory Environment – Negotiated Rulemaking.” These proposed regulations were published in a notice of proposed rulemaking on March 6, 2026, and subject to a public notice and comment period, which ended April 8, 2026. The second set of proposed regulations would establish new uniform accountability requirements applicable to all educational programs across all education sectors. See 10-K at “Regulatory Environment – Negotiated Rulemaking” and “Regulatory Environment – Gainful Employment and Accountability.” The DOE published these proposed regulations in a notice of proposed rulemaking on April 20, 2026, with a comment period ending on May 20, 2026. The regulations are expected to be published in final form and take effect by July 1, 2026, but we cannot predict the ultimate timing, content, or impact of the final regulations.
LINC insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 10 filings (6 insiders, 12 trade dates, 302,415 shares, about $14.9M). Net open-market shares: -302,415 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$14.9M.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-15 | Luster Alexandra M |
Open-market sale | 18,007 | $44.64 | $803.8K |
| 2026-06-12 | Juniper Investment Company, Llc |
Open-market sale | 37,000 | $46.88 | $1.7M |
| 2026-06-11 | Juniper Investment Company, Llc |
Open-market sale | 11,812 | $47.87 | $565.4K |
| 2026-06-10 | Carney Kevin M |
Open-market sale | 3,000 | $48.00 | $144.0K |
| 2026-06-08 | Carney Kevin M |
Other | 3,216 | — | — |
| 2026-06-08 | Carney Kevin M |
Other | 3,216 | — | — |
| 2026-06-05 | Luster Alexandra M |
Open-market sale | 1,993 | $50.11 | $99.9K |
| 2026-06-04 | Juniper Investment Company, Llc |
Open-market sale | 25,208 | $51.13 | $1.3M |
| 2026-06-03 | Juniper Investment Company, Llc |
Open-market sale | 81,504 | $50.10 | $4.1M |
| 2026-06-03 | Pryor Felecia J. |
Open-market sale | 2,000 | $49.70 | $99.4K |
| 2026-05-22 | Burke James J Jr |
Open-market sale | 15,807 | $48.36 | $764.4K |
| 2026-05-18 | Burke James J Jr |
Open-market sale | 16,000 | $49.54 | $792.6K |
| 2026-05-15 | Juniper Investment Company, Llc |
Open-market sale | 1,985 | $50.11 | $99.5K |
| 2026-05-14 | Burke James J Jr |
Open-market sale | 193 | $51.76 | $10.0K |
| 2026-05-14 | Juniper Investment Company, Llc |
Open-market sale | 47,836 | $51.16 | $2.4M |
| 2026-05-12 | Meyers Brian K |
Open-market sale | 40,070 | $49.98 | $2.0M |
| 2026-05-07 | Bartholdson John A. |
Grant/award | 3,515 | $44.10 | $155.0K |
| 2026-05-07 | Carney Kevin M |
Grant/award | 2,495 | $44.10 | $110.0K |
| 2026-05-07 | Plater Michael A |
Grant/award | 2,495 | $44.10 | $110.0K |
| 2026-05-07 | Pryor Felecia J. |
Grant/award | 2,495 | $44.10 | $110.0K |
| 2026-05-07 | Cabral Anna Escobedo |
Grant/award | 2,495 | $44.10 | $110.0K |
| 2026-05-07 | Newhart Marta |
Grant/award | 2,495 | $44.10 | $110.0K |
| 2026-05-07 | Rose Carlton |
Grant/award | 2,495 | $44.10 | $110.0K |
| 2026-05-07 | Young Sylvia Jean |
Grant/award | 2,495 | $44.10 | $110.0K |
| 2026-05-07 | Burke James J Jr |
Grant/award | 2,495 | $44.10 | $110.0K |
Well-known investors holding LINC (13F)
None of the 59 investors we track reported a position in their latest 13F.