Companies › LRHC

LRHC 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

La Rosa Holdings Corp. · Nasdaq · Real Estate Agents & Managers (For Others) · CIK 1879403 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

45 / 8risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
14new risk-factor headings
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-06-04 (period ending 2025-12-31) with 10-K filed 2025-04-15 (period ending 2024-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

45new paragraphs
8removed paragraphs
20reworded paragraphs
14,762 → 18,710words in section

New heading “A significant adoption by consumers of alternatives to full-service agents or loan originators could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects and results of operations.”

New heading “Failing to develop and maintain a positive relationship with our franchisees, agents and loan originators could compromise our ability to maintain or expand or franchisee network.”

New heading “Our franchise model can be subject to particular litigation risks.”

New heading “Risks Related to Cryptocurrencies and Digital Assets”

New heading “The continuing development and acceptance of digital assets and distributed ledger technology are subject to a variety of risks.”

New heading “Digital assets represent a new and rapidly evolving industry, and the market price of our Common Stock may in the future be impacted by the acceptance of stablecoins and other digital assets.”

New heading “Due to a lack of familiarity and some negative publicity associated with digital asset trading platforms, existing and potential customers, counterparties and regulators may lose confidence in digital asset trading platforms.”

New heading “The foreign and U.S. tax treatment of transactions in digital assets is unclear.”

New heading “Blockchain networks, digital assets and the digital asset trading platforms on which these assets are traded are dependent on internet and other blockchain infrastructure, which are susceptible to system failures, security risks and rapid technological change.”

New heading “If we hold digital assets through custodial arrangements or otherwise rely on private keys in the future, the loss, theft, destruction, or compromise of such private keys could result in the loss of digital assets and other adverse consequences.”

New heading “Certain shares previously issued and sold under our Third Amended and Restated La Rosa Holdings Corp. 2022 Agent Incentive Plan may have been sold in violation of federal and state securities laws and may be subject to rescission rights and other penalties, requiring us to repurchase shares sold thereunder.”

New heading “Risks Relating to the Restatement of the Prior Financial Statements”

New heading “We have concluded that certain of our previously issued financial statements should not be relied upon and have restated them, which was time-consuming, expensive and could expose us to additional risks that could have a negative effect on us.”

New heading “The restatement of the Prior Financial Statements may lead to future stockholder litigation.”

Removed heading “We may not realize the expected benefits of our recent acquisitions because of integration difficulties and other challenges.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: material weakness, restatement, impairment, goodwill
“Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we include a report from management on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Based on evaluation of our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer as of December 31, 2025, our management has identified material weaknesses primarily related to deficiencies in our overall control environment including limited accounting resources, inadequate segregation of duties, and the absence of formalized policies and procedures. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: restatement, litigation
“The restatement of the Prior Financial Statements may lead to future stockholder litigation.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: material weakness, restatement
“As discussed in the Explanatory Note of this Comprehensive Form 10-K and in Note 2, “Restatement of Previously Issued Consolidated Financial Statements” under Item 8 of this Comprehensive Form 10-K, we have concluded that the Prior Financial Statements should not be relied upon. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: restatement, litigation, lawsuit
“Lawsuits may be commenced against the Company and its officers and directors based in part or whole on allegations related to the restatement of the Prior Financial Statements. As with any substantial litigation, the Company expects to devote significant time, attention and resources to the defense of the litigation, which may have a material adverse effect on the Company even if the litigation is resolved in a manner favorable to the Company, and cannot predict when or how the litigation will be resolved or estimate what the potential loss or range of loss would be, if any.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: bankruptcy, breach, regulation
“Since the inception of the cryptoeconomy, numerous digital asset trading platforms have been sued, investigated, or shut down due to fraud, manipulative practices, business failure, and security breaches. In many of these instances, customers of these platforms were not compensated or made whole for their losses. Larger platforms are more appealing targets for hackers and malware, and may also be more likely to be targets of regulatory enforcement actions. For example, in 2022 and 2023, each of Celsius Networks, Voyager Digital, Three Arrows Capital, FTX and Genesis declared bankruptcy. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: restatement
“Risks Relating to the Restatement of the Prior Financial Statements”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (73)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 2 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Our independent auditors have included an explanatory paragraph in their audit report, included in this Annual Report onComprehensive Form 10-K, regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. This going concern risk may materially limit our ability to raise additional funds through the issuance of new debt or equity or may adversely affect the terms upon which such capital may be available. The inability to obtain sufficient financing on acceptable terms could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, and business prospects.

Reworded

We began operations in 2021. As a result of our limited operating history, we have limited financial data that can be used to evaluate our current business, and such data may not be indicative of future performance. We have encountered, and expect to continue to encounter, risks and difficulties frequently experienced by growing companies, including challenges in financial forecasting accuracy, hiring of experienced personnel, hiring of technology employees, determining appropriate investments, developing new products and features, assessing legal and regulatory risks, among others. Any evaluation of our business and prospects should be considered in light of our limited operating history, and the risks and uncertainties inherent in investing in early-stage companies. In addition, recent settlements of litigation based on alleged violations of federal and state antitrust laws may have an adverse impact on our potential growth. See “Risk Factors - Adverse outcomes in litigation and regulatory actions against the NAR, other real estate brokerage companies and agents in our industry could adversely impact our financial results,” below.

Reworded

Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as trade names, are recorded at fair value at the time of acquisition and are not amortized, but are reviewed for impairment at least annually or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. In evaluating the potential for impairment of goodwill and trade names, we make assumptions regarding future operating performance, business trends and market and economic conditions. Such analyses further require us to make certain assumptions about our sales, operating margins, growth rates and discount rates. There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors and in applying these factors to the assessment of goodwill and trade name recoverability. Goodwill reviews are prepared using estimates of the fair value of reporting units based on the estimated present value of future discounted cash flows. We could be required to evaluate the recoverability of goodwill or trade names prior to the annual assessment if we experience disruptions to the business, unexpected significant declines in operating results, a divestiture of a significant component of our business or market capitalization declines. For the year ended December 31, 2024,2025, we conducted such a review and recorded an impairment of $787,438.$6,911,770 related to goodwill and intangible assets.

Removed

We may not realize the expected benefits of our recent acquisitions because of integration difficulties and other challenges.

Removed

The success of our recent acquisitions will depend, in part, on our ability to realize the anticipated revenue, cost-savings, tax, collaboration and other synergies from integrating our two recent acquisitions with our existing business. The integration process may be complex, costly, and time-consuming. The difficulties of integrating the operations could include, among others:

Removed

We may not accomplish the integration smoothly, successfully, or within the anticipated costs or time frame. The diversion of the attention of management from our current operations to the integration effort and any difficulties encountered in combining operations could prevent us from realizing the full benefits anticipated to result from the share exchanges and could adversely affect our business. In addition, the integration efforts could divert the focus and resources of the management of the Company from other strategic opportunities and operational matters during the integration process.

Reworded

If we do not raise sufficient capital to fund our ongoing development activities, it is likely that we will be unable to carry out our business plans. We may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms acceptable, or at all. Even if we obtain financing for near termnear-term operations, we may require additional capital beyond the near term. If we are unable to raise capital when needed, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected, and we could be forced to reduce or discontinue our operations.

Reworded

The residential real estate market tends to be cyclical and typically is affected by changes in general economic conditions which are beyond our control. These conditions include short-term and long-term interest rates, inflation, fluctuations in debt and equity capital markets, levels of unemployment, consumer confidence and the general condition of the U.S. and the global economy. The residential real estate market also depends upon the strength of financial institutions, which are sensitive to changes in the general macroeconomic environment. Lack of available credit or lack of confidence in the financial sector could impact the residential real estate market, which in turn could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Due to the cyclicality of the real estate market, we cannot predict whether the prior several year period of sustained growth will continue, whether mortgage rates which have climbed over 2022-20242022-2025 will remain at relatively higher levels than in years past and whether home prices will stabilize. The U.S. has experienced housing “bubbles” in the past which have burst, resulting in significant price declines, mortgage defaults and home foreclosures by lenders, the last one occurring in the early 2000’s.2000s.

Reworded

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (“BLS”) reported that the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), a broad-based measure of goods and services costs, rose 0.40.3 percent in February 20242026 seasonally adjusted, and rose 2.82.4 percent over the last 12 months,months ending January 2026, not seasonally adjusted.adjusted.1 This increase was wellabove above the Federal Reserve System’s (the “Fed”) targeted inflation rate of 2.0%, The 20242025 federal funds interest rate in late December decreased to 4.33a range of 3.50 to 3.75 primarily due to moderatingstubborn inflation and signs of a weakening labor market.market.2 TheInflation Federal Open Market Committee decidedcontinues to lower the key overnight borrowing rate by 50 basis points, marking the first rate cut since the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, inflation was coming under controldecline after a period of rising prices, which contributed to the decision. The Fed aimedaims to provide financial relief to borrowers and continue to cool down an overheated economy. Fed funds rates impact interest rates on government bonds that have a correlated effect on mortgage interest rates, which, as of March 20,26, 2025,2026, the average rate for a 30-year fixed rate mortgage was 6.676.38 according to Freddie Mac, the federally chartered home mortgage loan securitizer.securitizer.3 Mortgage interest rates have continued to have a depressingan effect on the sale of existing homes, that include single-family homes, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops, with a year over year decrease of 1.2%1.4% in February 2024 2026 to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.264.09 million.million.4 The slowdown of home sales transactions resulted from many would-be buyers being priced out of homeownership while many homeowners with mortgage rates below 4.0% feeling stuck in place, since selling would mean taking on a mortgage with a significantly higher interest rate. This has had an adverse effect on our agents’ ability to close sales and thus on our results of operations in the year ended December 31, 2024.2025. Thus, we expect these trends to continue to adversely affect our revenues in 2025.2026. Any further increase in the Fed funds rate could push the U.S. economy into a recession which is likely to have a further negative effect on our operations, income and financial condition.

Reworded

The combination of high mortgage rates, continuing high home prices and limited inventory slowed the housing market substantially in 2024. 2025. Tight inventory was reflected by the risesustained in thehigh national median existing home sale price in February 20252026 of 3.8%$398,000, toa $398,400slight increase of 0.3% from a year earlier ($384,500).earlier. Homes usually go under contract a month or two before they close, so the February data is based on purchase decisions made in December 20242025 and January 2025.2026. The average rate for a 30-year fixed mortgage was 6.67%6.38% as of March 20,26, 2025,2026, down from 7.22%6.65% during the most recent 52 week52-week period, according to Freddie Mac. This combination of higher mortgage rates and higher sales prices has kept many sellers, who would have to relinquish a mortgage at 4.0% or less, from selling, and has pushed many prospective buyers, especially first-time home buyers, out of the market. Total housing inventory at the end of February 20242026 was 1.241.29 million units, up 5.1%3.1% from January and up 17.0%7.9% from one year ago (1.061.24 million). There was an unsold inventory supply of 3.5-months3.8-months at the current sales pace, equal2.4% tohigher than January 20242026 but only up from 3.00.1 monthsmonth infrom February 2024. 2025. Management expects the housing-market slowdown to persist throughout 2025 because home-buying affordability is near its lowest level in decades. Any decline in home sales directly affects the productivity and income of our agents who are paid only upon the closing of their clients’ home purchase or sale. A prolonged depression in home sales will force the least successful agents out of the industry and a decrease in the number of earning agents will have a negative impact on our financial performance and results of operations.

Added

A significant adoption by consumers of alternatives to full-service agents or loan originators could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects and results of operations.

Added

A significant increase in consumer use of technology that eliminates or minimizes the role of the real estate agent could have a materially adverse effect on our business, prospects and results of operations. These options include cloud-based competitors such as direct-buyer companies that purchase directly from the seller, and online discounters who reduce the role of the agent in order to offer sellers a low commission or a flat fee while giving rebates to buyers. How consumers want to buy or sell houses will determine if these models reduce or replace the long-standing preference for full-service agents. In addition, advances in AI and related technology may accelerate the development of tools that diminish the perceived value of full-service real estate agents.

Added

Failing to develop and maintain a positive relationship with our franchisees, agents and loan originators could compromise our ability to maintain or expand or franchisee network.

Added

Although we believe our relationships with our franchisees and their agents are strong, the nature of such relationships can give rise to conflict. For example, franchisees, or agents may become dissatisfied with the fees and dues owed to us, particularly in a period of economic downturn and uncertainty or in the event that we increase fees and dues. Affiliates may also disagree with certain network-wide policies and procedures, including policies dictating brand standards or affecting their marketing efforts. They may also be disappointed with other aspects of our value proposition including our marketing initiatives, technology offerings, or educational content. If we experience any conflicts with our franchisees on a large scale, our franchisees may decide not to renew their franchise agreements upon expiration or seek to disaffiliate with us, which could result in litigation. These events may, in turn, materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

Added

An organized franchisee association could also pose risks to our ability to set the terms of our franchise agreements and our pricing.

Added

Our franchise model can be subject to particular litigation risks.

Added

Litigation against a franchisee or its affiliated agents or loan originators, whether in the ordinary course of business or otherwise, may also include claims against us for liability by virtue of the franchise relationship. Franchisees may fail to obtain insurance that is required pursuant to the terms of our franchise agreements, naming the Company as an additional insured on such claims. Claims against us (including vicarious liability claims) could result in substantial costs, divert our management resources and could cause adverse publicity, which may materially and adversely affect us and our brand, regardless of whether such allegations are valid or whether we are liable.

Added

In addition to claims over individual or isolated franchisee actions, third parties could attempt to hold us responsible for actions of our franchisees and their agents or loan originators in the aggregate. Our franchised business model is unlike a traditional, integrated corporation where company-owned outlets provide goods or services to consumers and the corporation has direct responsibility for operations at those outlets. Our franchised business model is also unlike many franchisors in other industries—such as the restaurant and hospitality industries—where franchisors may dictate many operational details of the franchisees’ businesses and the delivery of goods and services to consumers and thereby have some of the liability for those or other aspects of the franchisees’ operations. Because we franchise in professional service fields where licensure is required—real estate and mortgage brokerage—we do not dictate or control the day-to-day operations, or the advice provided by our franchisees or their affiliated agents or loan originators. Nonetheless, third parties may try to hold us liable for actions of our franchisees and their agents or loan originators, even when we have no involvement with those actions and they are beyond our control and, we believe, should not result in liability to us. As a franchisor, unlike an integrated corporation, we obtain only a small portion of the revenue of our franchisees, and as a result our capital is limited in comparison with the size of our entire franchise networks. Therefore, if third parties were successful in asserting liability for practices of our franchise network in its entirety, and in holding us vicariously responsible for that liability, the resulting damages could exceed our available capital, could materially affect our earnings, or even render us insolvent.

Reworded

Adverse U.S. and global market, economic and political conditions, including the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia, recent events conflicts in the Middle East and other events or circumstances beyond our control could have a material adverse effect on us.

Reworded

Another economic or financial crisis or rapid decline of the consumer economy, significant concerns over energy costs, geopolitical issues, including the ongoing conflict armed conflicts between Ukraine and Russia, recentUnited eventsStates and Iran, as well as in Israel and the MiddleGaza East,Strip, the availability and cost of credit, the U.S. mortgage market, or a declining real estate market in the U.S. can contribute to increased volatility, diminished expectations for the economy and the markets, and high levels of structural unemployment by historical standards.

Reworded

If we re-commence activitiesWe abroad, we will beare subject to risks of operating in foreign countries.

Reworded

WeIn 2025, have also recentlywe commenced an expansion of our business in Europe, starting with engaging an area developer inand Spain. Previously, we hadestablishing a franchisee locatedsubsidiary in Spain. Peru that closed in 2022, but we may franchise other international locations in the future. When we re-commence activities abroad, ourOur international operations will beare subject to risks that are different from those of our U.S. operations that could result in losses against which we are not insured and therefore negatively affect our profitability. Those international risks include:

Reworded

We depend substantially on our Founder ,Founder, Joseph La Rosa, and our Chief Operating Officer, Deana La Rosa, and the loss of any our senior management or other key employees or the inability to hire additional qualified personnel could adversely affect our operations, our brand and our financial performance.

Reworded

Our future success is largely dependent on the efforts and abilities of our Founder, Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer, President Officer and Chairman, President, Joseph La Rosa, our Chief Operating Officer, Deana La Rosa, our senior management and other key employees. The loss of the services of Mr. La Rosa, Mrs. La Rosa and other senior management would have a significant detrimental effect on the Company as its brand is tied to their name, image and personality. We do not maintain key employee life insurance policies on Mr. La Rosa or our other senior management and therefore their loss could make it more difficult to successfully operate our business and achieve our business goals. As a result, we may not be able to cover the financial loss we may incur in losing the services of any of these individuals.

Reworded

Based on our Common Stock outstanding as of DecemberJune 31,3, 2024,2026, Mr. La Rosa beneficially owned approximately 28%0.19% of our outstanding Common Stock and all 2,0001,800 shares of our Series X Preferred Stock that provides for 10,000 votes per share when voting with the Common Stock, representing 62%91.81% of the total voting power of our capital stock. Thus, Mr. La Rosa, our President andPresident, Chief Executive Officer, and Interim Chief Financial Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company (“Board” or “Board of Directors”), and majority stockholder, controls all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election and removal of directors and any merger or other significant corporate transactions. transactions. The interests of Mr. La Rosa may not coincide with the interests of other stockholders.

Reworded

Mr. Joseph La Rosa has voting control with respect to director elections and all other matters. Subject to any fiduciary duties owed to other stockholders under Nevada law, Mr. La Rosa controls all matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election and removal of directors and any proposed merger, acquisition, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. In addition, due to his significant ownership stake and his service as our Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, Director and Interim Chief Financial Officer, Mr. La Rosa controls the management of our business and affairs. Mr. La Rosa may have interests that are different than yours and may support proposals and actions with which you may disagree. This concentration of ownership could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control, or impeding a merger or consolidation, takeover or other business combination that could be favorable to our other stockholders and adversely affecting the market price of our Common Stock.

Reworded

Because Mr. La Rosa controls, as of AprilJune 15,3, 2025,2026, 50.5%91.81% of the total voting power of our capital stock, we are considered a “controlled company” for the purposes of the listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market. A controlled company is not required to have a majority of independent directors or form an independent compensation or nominating and corporate governance committee. Nevertheless, we have a majority of independent directors who will serve on our Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. However, although we have no current plans to do so, for as long as we remain a controlled company, we could take advantage of such exemptions in the future.

Reworded

We regard our “LR La Rosa Realty” service mark and the “LR” logo that we own, as having significant value and as being important factors in the marketing of our brand. We believe that this and other intellectual property are valuable assets that are critical to our success. We rely on a combination of protections provided by contracts, as well as copyright, trademark, trade secret and other laws, to protect our intellectual property from infringement, misappropriation, or dilution. We have registered certain trademarks and service marks and have other trademark and service mark registration applications pending in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions. However, not all trademarks or service marks that we currently use have been registered in all of the countries in which we may do business in the future, and they may never be registered in all of those countries. Although we monitor trademark portfolios internally and impose an obligation on franchisees to notify us upon learning of potential infringement, there can be no assurance that we will be able to adequately maintain, enforce and protect our trademarks or other intellectual property rights.

Reworded

As an example, in the matter of Burnett v. National Association of Realtors (U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri), a federal jury found thatthe the NAR and certain other remaining brokerage defendants liable for $1.8 billion in damages on claims that these companies conspired to artificially inflate brokerage commissions, which is in violation of federal antitrust law (the “Burnett Ruling”). The verdict was appealed on October 31, 2023. Additionally, certain other brokerage defendants settled with the plaintiffs, including both monetary and non-monetary settlement terms. That same day, the NAR, EXP World Holdings, Inc., Compass, Inc., Redfin Corporation, Weichert Realtors, United Real Estate, Howard Hann Real Estate Services, and Douglas Elliman, Inc.Inc., The Keyes Company, Illustrated Properties, LLC, Baird & Warner, Inc., Real Estate One, Inc., and others were named as defendants in Gibson v. National Association of Realtors (U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri), alleging a similar fact pattern and antitrust violations. On or about March 15, 2024, NAR agreed to settle the Burnett Ruling, along with a sister litigation, by agreeing to pay $418 million over approximately four years, and changing certain of its rules surrounding agent commissions (the “Burnett Settlement”).commissions. On November 26, 2024, the BurnettNAR Settlement receivedwas itsgranted over objections, The final approval.approval Onorder Marchis 22,currently 2024,being realappealed. estateIf brokeragethe companyNAR CompassSettlement Inc.is announcedsustained thaton appeal, it will payis $57.5 million as part of a proposed settlementexpected to resolve claims lawsuitsagainst overthe real estate commissionsNAR and agreedcertain companies related to changethis its business practices to ensure clients can more easily understand how brokers and agents are compensated for their services.matter.

Added

On March 22, 2024, real estate brokerage company Compass Inc. (“Compass”) announced that it will pay $57.5 million as part of a proposed settlement to resolve lawsuits over real estate commissions and agreed to change its business practices to ensure clients can more easily understand how brokers and agents are compensated for their services. Compass’s motion for final approval of the settlement agreement was granted on October 31, 2024 and the settlement agreement is now effective. The final approval ruling was appealed by certain class members that objected to the settlement and is now pending before the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. In the same litigation, the court granted final approval of multiple additional settlements, including (i) an $8.62 million settlement on June 25, 2025 involving The Keyes Company Illustrated Properties, LLC, Baird & Warner, Inc. Real Estate One, Inc. and other defendants, and (ii) a $42 million settlement on February 5, 2026 involving William Raveis Real Estate Inc., Hanna Holdings Inc., Windermere Real Estate Services Company Inc., Exit Realty Corp. International, Exit Realty Corp. USA, and William L. Lyon & Associates Inc.

Added

Risks Related to Cryptocurrencies and Digital Assets

Added

The continuing development and acceptance of digital assets and distributed ledger technology are subject to a variety of risks.

Added

Cryptocurrencies, such as stablecoins, and the other types of digital assets in which we began investing and trading in 2026 involve a new and rapidly evolving industry of which blockchain technology is a prominent, but not unique, part. The growth of the digital asset industry in general, and distributed ledger technology that supports digital assets, is subject to a high degree of uncertainty. The factors affecting the further development of the digital asset industry, as well as distributed ledger technology, include:

Added

Many digital asset networks, including Bitcoin and Ethereum, operate on open-source protocols maintained by groups of core developers. The open-source structure of these network protocols means that certain core developers and other contributors may not be compensated, either directly or indirectly, for their contributions in maintaining and developing the network protocol. A failure to properly monitor and upgrade network protocol could damage digital asset networks. As these network protocols are not sold and their use does not generate revenues for development teams, core developers may not be directly compensated for maintaining and updating the network protocols. Consequently, developers may lack a financial incentive to maintain or develop the network, and the core developers may lack the resources to adequately address emerging issues with the networks. There can be no guarantee that developer support will continue or be sufficient in the future. To the extent that material issues arise with certain digital asset network protocols and the core developers and open-source contributors are unable or unwilling to address the issues adequately or in a timely manner, such digital asset networks, and any corresponding digital assets held may be adversely affected.

Added

Digital assets represent a new and rapidly evolving industry, and the market price of our Common Stock may in the future be impacted by the acceptance of stablecoins and other digital assets.

Added

Digital assets built on blockchain technology were only introduced in 2008 and remain in the early stages of development. The Bitcoin network was first launched in 2009 and bitcoins were the first cryptographic digital assets created to gain global adoption and critical mass. Cryptographic and algorithmic protocols governing the issuance of digital assets represent a new and rapidly evolving industry that is subject to a variety of factors that are difficult to evaluate. If we continue investing significant funds in stablecoins and other digital assets, our results of operations and the market price of our Common Stock may be closely correlated with the acceptance and perception of such digital assets. As a result, the realization of one or more of the following risks could materially adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock:

Added

Digital assets are a new asset class and represent a technological innovation and they are subject to a high degree of uncertainty. The adoption of digital assets will require growth in usage and in the blockchain technology generally for various applications. Adoption of digital assets will also require greater regulatory clarity. A lack of expansion in use of digital assets and blockchain technologies would adversely affect our financial performance. In addition, there is no assurance that digital assets generally will maintain their value over the long term. The value of digital assets is subject to risks related to our use. If growth in the use of digital assets generally occurs in the near or medium term, there is no assurance that such use will continue to grow over the long term. A contraction in use of digital assets may result in increased volatility or a reduction in digital asset prices, which would materially and adversely affect our investment and trading strategies, the value of our assets and the value of any investment in us.

Added

Due to a lack of familiarity and some negative publicity associated with digital asset trading platforms, existing and potential customers, counterparties and regulators may lose confidence in digital asset trading platforms.

Added

Since the inception of the cryptoeconomy, numerous digital asset trading platforms have been sued, investigated, or shut down due to fraud, manipulative practices, business failure, and security breaches. In many of these instances, customers of these platforms were not compensated or made whole for their losses. Larger platforms are more appealing targets for hackers and malware, and may also be more likely to be targets of regulatory enforcement actions. For example, in 2022 and 2023, each of Celsius Networks, Voyager Digital, Three Arrows Capital, FTX and Genesis declared bankruptcy. In particular, in November 2022, FTX-which was at the time one of the world’s largest and most popular digital asset trading platforms-became insolvent, and it was revealed that the platform had been misusing customer assets. These events resulted in a loss of confidence in the broader cryptoeconomy, adverse reputational impact to digital asset platforms, increased negative publicity surrounding crypto more broadly, heightened scrutiny by regulators and lawmakers and a call for increased regulation of digital assets and digital asset platforms.

Added

In addition, there have been reports that a significant amount of trading volume on digital asset trading platforms is fabricated and false in nature. Such reports may indicate that the market for digital asset trading platform activities is significantly smaller than otherwise understood.

Added

Negative perception, a lack of stability and standardized regulation in the cryptoeconomy, and the closure or temporary shutdown of digital asset trading platforms due to fraud, business failure, hackers or malware, or government mandated regulation, and associated losses suffered by customers may reduce confidence in the cryptoeconomy and result in greater volatility of the prices of assets, including significant depreciation in value. If we continue investing significant funds into digital assets, any of these events could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and our business.

Added

The foreign and U.S. tax treatment of transactions in digital assets is unclear.

Added

Due to the new and evolving nature of digital assets and the absence of comprehensive guidance with respect to digital assets, many significant aspects of the foreign and U.S. federal income tax treatment of digital assets are uncertain. Our operations and dealings in or in connection with digital assets, as well as transactions in digital assets generally, could be subject to adverse tax consequences in the United States, including as a result of development of the legal regimes surrounding digital assets, and our operating results, as well as the price of digital assets, could be adversely affected thereby.

Added

Many significant aspects of the U.S. federal income tax treatment of digital assets (including with respect to the amount, timing and character of income recognition) are uncertain. In 2014, the IRS released Notice 2014-21, discussing certain aspects of “virtual currency” for U.S. federal income tax purposes and, in particular, stating that such virtual currency (i) is “property,” (ii) is not “currency” for purposes of the rules relating to foreign currency gain or loss, and (iii) may be held as a capital asset. From time to time, the IRS has released other notices and rulings relating to the tax treatment of virtual currency or digital assets reflecting the IRS’s position on certain issues. The IRS has not addressed many other significant aspects of the U.S. federal income tax treatment of digital assets and related transactions.

Added

There continues to be uncertainty with respect to the timing, character and amount of income inclusions for various digital asset transactions including, but not limited to, lending and borrowing digital assets, staking, and other digital asset products that we offer. Although we believe our treatment of digital asset transactions for federal income tax purposes is consistent with current public positions of the IRS and/or existing U.S. federal income tax principles, because of the rapidly evolving nature of digital asset innovations and the increasing variety and complexity of digital asset transactions and products, it is possible the IRS and various U.S. states may disagree with our treatment of certain digital asset offerings for U.S. tax purposes, which could adversely affect the vitality of our business. We do not intend to request a ruling from the IRS on these issues, and we will take positions on these and other U.S. federal income tax issues relating to digital assets that we believe to be reasonable.

Added

There can be no assurance that the IRS, U.S. state revenue agencies, or other foreign tax authorities will not alter their respective positions with respect to digital assets in the future or that a court would uphold the treatment set forth in existing positions. It also is unclear what additional tax authority positions, regulations, or legislation may be issued in the future on the treatment of existing digital asset transactions and future digital asset innovations under U.S. federal, U.S. state, or foreign tax law. Any such developments could result in adverse tax consequences for holders of digital assets and could have an adverse effect on the value of digital assets and the broader digital assets markets. Future technological and operational developments that may arise with respect to digital assets may increase the uncertainty with respect to the treatment of digital assets for U.S. and foreign tax purposes. The uncertainty regarding tax treatment of digital asset transactions could impact our business, both domestically and abroad.

Added

Blockchain networks, digital assets and the digital asset trading platforms on which these assets are traded are dependent on internet and other blockchain infrastructure, which are susceptible to system failures, security risks and rapid technological change.

Added

The success of cryptocurrency-based blockchain and other digital asset platforms will depend on the continued development of a stable public infrastructure, with the necessary speed, data capacity and security, and the timely development of complementary products such as high-speed modems for providing reliable internet access and services. Digital assets have experienced, and are expected to continue to experience, significant growth in the number of users and amount of content. Blockchains will continue to be increasingly interconnected with other blockchains and real-world applications. As services and applications continue to be built on top of blockchains, they will place increased reliance on third-party infrastructure providers, including in connection with cross-chain bridges and messaging, liquidity providers, wallets, data feeds and oracles. Reliance on any of these third-parties introduces additional risks and points of failure. There is no assurance that the relevant digital asset infrastructure will continue to be able to support the demands placed on it by this continued growth or that the performance or reliability of the technology will not be adversely affected by this continued growth. There is also no assurance that the infrastructure or complementary products or services necessary to make digital assets a viable product for their intended use will be developed in a timely manner, or that such development will not result in the requirement of incurring substantial costs to adapt to changing technologies. The failure of these technologies or platforms or their development could materially and adversely affect our investment and trading strategies, the value of our assets and the value of any investment in us. Any number of anticipated or unforeseen technical changes, software upgrades, soft or hard forks, cybersecurity incidents or other changes to the underlying blockchain network may occur from time to time, causing incompatibility, technical issues, disruptions or security weaknesses to our systems. If our third-party providers are unable to identify, troubleshoot and resolve any such issues successfully, they may no longer be able to support certain cryptocurrencies or blockchain networks, our assets may be frozen or lost, the security of our hot or cold wallets may be compromised and their systems and technical infrastructure may be affected, all of which could adversely impact the success of our business, financial condition and results of operations. Cryptocurrencies are created, issued, transmitted, and stored according to protocols run by computers in the cryptocurrency network. It is possible these protocols have undiscovered flaws or could be subject to network scale attacks which could result in losses to us.

Added

If we hold digital assets through custodial arrangements or otherwise rely on private keys in the future, the loss, theft, destruction, or compromise of such private keys could result in the loss of digital assets and other adverse consequences.

Added

Access to and transfer of digital assets generally requires the use of private cryptographic keys associated with a digital asset wallet. If we hold digital assets directly or through one or more custodians in the future, the security and availability of those private keys would be critical to our ability to access, transfer, and safeguard our digital assets. If private keys are lost, destroyed, stolen, compromised, or otherwise become inaccessible, and any backup or recovery mechanisms are unavailable or ineffective, the associated digital assets may become permanently inaccessible or may be misappropriated by unauthorized parties.

Added

In connection with any future digital asset activities, we may rely on third-party custodians, wallet providers, or other service providers to store, safeguard, or administer digital assets. Such service providers may experience cybersecurity incidents, hacking events, insider misconduct, operational failures, technological malfunctions, data loss, or other disruptions that could impair their ability to safeguard or provide access to digital assets. In addition, digital asset wallets, blockchain networks, smart contracts, and related technologies may be vulnerable to security breaches, software defects, coding errors, phishing attacks, private key compromises, or other malicious activities.

Added

If any private keys associated with digital assets owned by us or held on our behalf are compromised, or if any custodian or service provider is unable to access or recover such private keys, we could lose access to some or all of our digital assets. Any such event could result in financial losses, litigation, regulatory investigations or enforcement actions, reputational harm, increased compliance costs, operational disruptions, and other adverse effects on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Added

Furthermore, to the extent we expand our digital asset activities in the future to include customer-facing products or services, any loss of or inability to access digital assets could adversely affect our customers, expose us to contractual or legal liabilities, and damage our reputation and relationships with customers, counterparties, and regulators.

Added

On June 3, 2026, the closing price of our Common Stock was $1.21. Pursuant to Nasdaq Rule 5810(c)(3)(A)(iii), if the closing price of our Common Stock is $0.10 or less for 10 consecutive trading days, we will be issued a Staff Delisting Determination by Nasdaq. If we receive a Staff Delisting Determination Letter resulting from our Common Stock trading at or below $0.10 for 10 consecutive trading days, we will have 7 calendar days to request a hearing before a Nasdaq hearings panel to review the Staff Delisting Determination, which will determine the delisting of our Common Stock by Nasdaq. A hearing would then take place within 45 days of the hearing request to determine whether or not our Common Stock would be delisted. If, in the future, we receive a Staff Delisting Determination there can be no assurance that we would be successful in preventing a determination by the Nasdaq hearing panel that our stock will be delisted.

Removed

On October 10, 2024, we received a letter from Nasdaq notifying us that we were no longer in compliance with the $1.00 minimum bid price requirement for continued listing on Nasdaq under the Bid Price Rule. Pursuant to Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), the Company was provided an initial period of 180 calendar days, or until April 8, 2025, to regain compliance with the Bid Price Rule. On April 9, 2025, Nasdaq notified the Company that Nasdaq’s Staff has determined that the Company is eligible for an additional 180 calendar day period, or until October 6, 2025, to regain compliance. If we fail to regain compliance with the Bid Price Rule until October 6, 2025, or if we fail to continue to meet all applicable continued listing requirements for Nasdaq in the future, Nasdaq could delist our securities. Although Nasdaq has granted us additional 180 calendar days, to regain compliance with the Bid Price Rule, there can be no assurance that we will regain such compliance, or that we will maintain compliance with all applicable continued listing requirement for Nasdaq in the future, and Nasdaq could make a determination to delist our Common Stock.

Added

Additionally, in January 2026, Nasdaq proposed a rule change that would require companies listed on the Nasdaq Global and Capital Markets to maintain a minimum market value of listed securities (“MVLS”) of at least $5 million. If adopted, this requirement would represent an additional continued listing standard applicable to our Common Stock. Under the proposed rule, if a company’s MVLS falls below $5 million for 30 consecutive business days, Nasdaq would immediately suspend trading and delist the company’s securities, with no compliance or cure period. Unlike some other Nasdaq listing deficiencies, the proposed rule would not provide an opportunity to regain compliance prior to suspension, and a hearing request would not stay the suspension of trading. As of the date of this report, the Company’s MVLS is below $5 million. In addition, the market value of our Common Stock may fluctuate significantly due to a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control, including market conditions, investor sentiment toward small-cap companies, our operating performance, and general economic conditions. As a result, we may be unable to maintain the required MVLS threshold at all times. If this proposed rule is approved and adopted, any sustained decline in our MVLS below $5 million could result in the immediate suspension and delisting of our Common Stock from Nasdaq.

Removed

Furthermore, on April 7, 2025, the closing price of our Common Stock was $0.17. Pursuant to Nasdaq Rule 5810(c)(3)(A)(iii), if the closing price of our Common Stock is $0.10 or less for 10 consecutive trading days, we will be issued a Staff Delisting Determination by Nasdaq. If we receive a Staff Delisting Determination Letter resulting from our Common Stock trading at or below $0.10 for 10 consecutive trading days, we will have 7 calendar days to request a hearing before a Nasdaq hearings panel to review the Staff Delisting Determination, which will determine the delisting of our Common Stock by Nasdaq. A hearing would then take place within 45 days of the hearing request to determine whether or not our Common Stock would be delisted. If, in the future, we receive a Staff Delisting Determination there can be no assurance that we would be successful in preventing a determination by the Nasdaq hearing panel that our stock will be delisted.

Reworded

If, for example, the market for real estate relatedestate-related stocks or the stock market in general experiences loss of investor confidence, the trading price of our Common Stock could decline for reasons unrelated to our business, financial condition or operating results. The trading price of our shares might also decline in reaction to events that affect other companies in our industry, even if these events do not directly affect us. Each of these factors, among others, could harm the value of our Common Stock.

Added

Certain shares previously issued and sold under our Third Amended and Restated La Rosa Holdings Corp. 2022 Agent Incentive Plan may have been sold in violation of federal and state securities laws and may be subject to rescission rights and other penalties, requiring us to repurchase shares sold thereunder.

Added

During the period from December 31, 2024 to September 30, 2025, the Company mistakenly issued an aggregate 31 shares (as adjusted for the reverse stock split effected on July 7, 2025, January 26, 2026 and April 20, 2026) of restricted common stock to its contractors pursuant to Third Amended and Restated La Rosa Holdings Corp. 2022 Agent Incentive Plan (a part of the La Rosa Holdings Corp. 2022 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended), as free trading shares (the “Sales”). At the time of issuance of such securities, the Company mistakenly relied on the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-275118) filed by the Company with the SEC and declared effective upon such filing on October 20, 2023, while the shares issued in such Sales were not registered pursuant to such registration statement.

Showing the first 60 of 73 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

29new paragraphs
28removed paragraphs
25reworded paragraphs
6,814 → 6,211words in section

New heading “The discussion in this section has been impacted by the restatement described in the Explanatory Note at the beginning of this Comprehensive Form 10-K and in Note 2 and Note 3 of the consolidated financial statements of this Comprehensive Form 10-K. Certain of the financial and other information provided in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of our Financial Condition and Results of Operations has been updated to reflect the restatement adjustments.”

New heading “Real Estate Brokerage Services (Commercial)”

New heading “Title Settlement and Insurance”

New heading “Real Estate Brokerage Services (Commercial)”

New heading “Title Settlement and Insurance”

Removed heading “Material Cash Requirements from Known Contractual and Other Obligations”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: litigation, lawsuit, class action, antitrust
“While the Company was not named as a defendant in any of the recent class action lawsuits alleging antitrust violations, it is possible that it could be a litigant at some point in the future. Several of these lawsuits have been settled (see “Risk Factors - Adverse outcomes in litigation and regulatory actions against the NAR, other real estate brokerage companies and agents in our industry could adversely impact our financial results). These settlements can result in changes in the way real estate brokers are compensated for their services. …”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: litigation, lawsuit, class action, antitrust

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

The majority of our revenue is derived from fees and dues based on the number of agents working under the La Rosa Realty brand. Due to the low fixed cost structure of both our Company and franchise models, the addition of new sales agents generally requires little incremental investment in capital or infrastructure. Accordingly, the number of commission producing sales agents in our Company and our franchisees is the most important factor affecting our results of operations and the addition of new agents can favorably impact our revenue and our earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”). Historically, the number of agents in the residential real estate industry has been highly correlated with overall home sale transaction activity. We believe that the number of agents and those that produce commissions in our network is the primary statistic that drives our revenue. Another major factor is the cyclicality of the real estate industry that has peaks and valleys depending on macroeconomic conditions that we cannot control. And finally, our revenues fluctuate based on the changes in the aggregate fee revenue per sales agent as a significant portion of our revenue is tied to various fees that are ultimately tied to the number of agents, including annual dues, continuing franchise fees, and certain transaction or service-based fees. Our revenue per agent also increases in other ways including when transaction sides and transaction sizes increase since a portion of our revenue comes from fees tied to the number and size of real estate transactions closed by our agents. While the Company was not named as a defendant in any of the recent class action lawsuits alleging antitrust violations, it is possible that it could be a litigant at some point in the future. Several of these lawsuits have been settled (see “Risk Factors - Adverse outcomes in litigation and regulatory actions against the NAR, other real estate brokerage companies and agents in our industry could adversely impact our financial results). These settlements will result in changes in the way real estate brokers are compensated for their services. Most notably, home sellers will no longer be required to pay buyer agent commissions which will result in lower buyer agent compensation. We cannot predict the full breadth of the outcome of these lawsuits but believe that they will result in a significant adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations for the foreseeable future.
see in full comparison
New text topics: restatement
“The discussion in this section has been impacted by the restatement described in the Explanatory Note at the beginning of this Comprehensive Form 10-K and in Note 2 and Note 3 of the consolidated financial statements of this Comprehensive Form 10-K. Certain of the financial and other information provided in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of our Financial Condition and Results of Operations has been updated to reflect the restatement adjustments.”
see in full comparison
Reworded topics: litigation, lawsuit, antitrust

Paragraph as it now reads, with added and removed wording marked:

Recent developments in the real estate industry have seen increased scrutiny and legal challenges related to the structure of real estate agent commissions. Legal actions and regulatory inquiries have been initiated to examine the fairness, transparency, and potential anticompetitive practices associated with the traditional commission model. Courts and regulatory bodies may be increasingly focused on ensuring transparency in commission structures, potentially leading to reforms that impact the earnings and business models of real estate professionals. Changes in legislation or legal precedents could impact the standard practices of commission-sharing between listing agents and buyer’s agents and and may adversely affect our business model and revenues. On October 31, 2023, a federal jury in Missouri found that NAR and certain companies conspired to artificially inflate brokerage commissions, which violates federal antitrust law. The judgment was appealed on October 31, 2023, while these and other plaintiffs have filed similar lawsuits against a number of other large real estate brokerage companies. We have not, as of the date hereof, been named as a defendant in any antitrust litigation. On or about March 15, 2024, NAR agreed to settle these lawsuits, by agreeing to pay $418 million over approximately four years, and changing certain of its rules surrounding agent commissions. This settlement resolves claims against NAR and nearly every NAR member; all state, territorial and local REALTOR® associations; all association-owned MLSs; and all brokerages with an NAR member as principal whose residential transaction volume in 2022 was $2 billion or below and is subject to court approval. Due to this litigation, there will be rule changes for the NAR. In the settlement, effective mid-July 2024, NAR has agreed to put in place a new rule prohibiting offers of compensation on the MLS, as well as adopt new rules requiring written agreements between buyers and buyers’ agents. However, the direct and indirect effects, if any, of the judgment upon the real estate industry are not yet entirely clear.
see in full comparison
New text topics: litigation, antitrust
“On October 31, 2023, in the matter of Burnett v. National Association of Realtors (U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri), a federal jury found the NAR and certain other remaining brokerage defendants liable for $1.8 billion in damages on claims that these companies conspired to artificially inflate brokerage commissions, which is in violation of federal antitrust law (the “Burnett Ruling”). The verdict was appealed on October 31, 2023. Additionally, certain other brokerage defendants settled with the plaintiffs, including both monetary and non-monetary settlement terms. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: litigation, lawsuit
“On March 22, 2024, real estate brokerage company Compass Inc. (“Compass”) announced that it will pay $57.5 million as part of a proposed settlement to resolve lawsuits over real estate commissions and agreed to change its business practices to ensure clients can more easily understand how brokers and agents are compensated for their services. Compass’s motion for final approval of the settlement agreement was granted on October 31, 2024 and the settlement agreement is now effective. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (82)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 5 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Prospective investors should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our financial statements statements and the related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this annual report. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this annual report, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for for our business, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.Statements and Industry Data.” This discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.

Added

The discussion in this section has been impacted by the restatement described in the Explanatory Note at the beginning of this Comprehensive Form 10-K and in Note 2 and Note 3 of the consolidated financial statements of this Comprehensive Form 10-K. Certain of the financial and other information provided in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of our Financial Condition and Results of Operations has been updated to reflect the restatement adjustments.

Reworded

On October 12, 2023, we consummated our IPO.initial Followingpublic ouroffering IPO, during (the fiscal“IPO”). yearSince ended December 31, 2023,then, we acquired majority ownership of the following franchisees of the Company: Nona Legacy Powered By La Rosa Realty, Inc. (formerly, La Rosa Realty Lake Nona Inc.), Horeb Kissimmee Kissimmee Realty, LLC, La Rosa Realty Premier, LLC, La Rosa Realty Orlando, LLC, and 100% ownership of the following franchisees of the Company: La Rosa CW Properties, LLC and La Rosa Realty North Florida LLC. In December 2023, we also formed our majority owned subsidiary La Rosa Realty Texas LLC. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, we acquired majority ownership of the following franchisees and affiliates of the Company: La Rosa Realty Georgia LLC, La Rosa Realty California, La Rosa Realty Lakeland LLC DBA La Rosa Realty Prestige, and La Rosa Realty Success LLC,LLC and 100% ownership of the following franchisees of the Company: La Rosa Realty Orlando, LLC, La Rosa Realty Premier, LLC, La Rosa CW Properties, LLC, La Rosa Realty North Florida LLC, La Rosa Realty Winter Garden LLC, BF Prime LLC, FPG Title Group, LLC (formerly, Nona Title Agency LLC,LLC), La Rosa Realty Lakeland LLC (DBA La Rosa Realty Prestige), La Rosa Realty Beaches LLC, and Baxpi Holdings.Holdings Additionally,LLC. In December 2023, we acquiredalso theformed remainingour non-controllingmajority interestowned portions of Nona Legacy Powered By La Rosa Realty, Inc. (formerly,subsidiary La Rosa Realty LakeTexas NonaLLC. Inc.)In December 2024, we opened our first office and wholly owned subsidiary in North Carolina, La Rosa Realty NC LLC. In January 2025, we formed LR Luxury, LLC, engaged mostly in the residential real estate brokerage business. In April 2025, we formed LR Agent Advance, LLC, offering a commission advancement program exclusively for La Rosa agents. In 2025, we also formed LR Realty Premier, LLC,Spain, makingS.L., themour both 100%wholly owned entities.subsidiary in Spain.

Added

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, in an effort to simplify our corporate structure, we dissolved Baxpi Holdings LLC, which was non-operational, La Rosa Realty NC LLC, which was not profitable, and La Rosa Realty Success LLC, agents of which were moved to La Rosa CW Properties LLC. In February 2026, we also sold our majority interests in Horeb Kissimmee Realty, LLC to the minority member of that entity.

Removed

In December 2024, the Company opened its first office and wholly owned subsidiary in North Carolina, La Rosa Realty NC LLC.

Reworded

Our financial results are primarily driven by the total number of sales agents in our Company, the number of sales agents closing residential real estate transactions, the number of sales agents utilizing our coaching services, the number of agents who work with our franchisees, and the number of properties under management. We grew our agent count by six18 percent from 2,4342,581 atas of December 31, 20232024 to 2,5813,050 atas of December 31, 2024.2025.

Reworded

The majority of our revenue is derived from a stable set of fees paid by our brokers, franchisees, and consumers. We have multiple revenue streams, with the majority of our revenue derived from commissions paid by consumers who transact business with our and our franchisees’ agents, royalties paid by our franchisees, dues and technology fees paid by our sales agents, our franchisees, and our franchisees’ agents. Our major revenue streams come from such sources as: (i) residential real estate brokerage revenue, (ii) revenue from our property management services, (iii) franchise royalty fees, (iv) fees from the sale or renewal of franchises and other franchise revenue, (v) coaching, training and assistance fees, (vi) brokerage revenue generated transactionally on commercial real estate, (vii) fees generated from title services revenue and insurance and (viii) fees from our events and forums.

Reworded

The majority of our revenue is derived from fees and dues based on the number of agents working under the La Rosa Realty brand. Due to the low fixed cost structure of both our Company and franchise models, the addition of new sales agents generally requires little incremental investment in capital or infrastructure. Accordingly, the number of commission producing sales agents in our Company and our franchisees is the most important factor affecting our results of operations and the addition of new agents can favorably impact our revenue and our earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”). Historically, the number of agents in the residential real estate industry has been highly correlated with overall home sale transaction activity. We believe that the number of agents and those that produce commissions in our network is the primary statistic that drives our revenue. Another major factor is the cyclicality of the real estate industry that has peaks and valleys depending on macroeconomic conditions that we cannot control. And finally, our revenues fluctuate based on the changes in the aggregate fee revenue per sales agent as a significant portion of our revenue is tied to various fees that are ultimately tied to the number of agents, including annual dues, continuing franchise fees, and certain transaction or service-based fees. Our revenue per agent also increases in other ways including when transaction sides and transaction sizes increase since a portion of our revenue comes from fees tied to the number and size of real estate transactions closed by our agents. While the Company was not named as a defendant in any of the recent class action lawsuits alleging antitrust violations, it is possible that it could be a litigant at some point in the future. Several of these lawsuits have been settled (see “Risk Factors - Adverse outcomes in litigation and regulatory actions against the NAR, other real estate brokerage companies and agents in our industry could adversely impact our financial results). These settlements will result in changes in the way real estate brokers are compensated for their services. Most notably, home sellers will no longer be required to pay buyer agent commissions which will result in lower buyer agent compensation. We cannot predict the full breadth of the outcome of these lawsuits but believe that they will result in a significant adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations for the foreseeable future.

Added

While the Company was not named as a defendant in any of the recent class action lawsuits alleging antitrust violations, it is possible that it could be a litigant at some point in the future. Several of these lawsuits have been settled (see “Risk Factors - Adverse outcomes in litigation and regulatory actions against the NAR, other real estate brokerage companies and agents in our industry could adversely impact our financial results). These settlements can result in changes in the way real estate brokers are compensated for their services. Most notably, home sellers will no longer be required to pay buyer agent commissions which will result in lower buyer agent compensation. We cannot predict the full breadth of the outcome of these lawsuits but believe that they will result in a significant adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations for the foreseeable future.

Reworded

The benchmark 30-year fixed conforming mortgage rate rose to a peak of about 8% during the second half of 2023, according to Freddie Mac data. That interest rate then retreated to between 6.08% and 7.22% during 2024 and between 6.15% to 7.04% during 2025. Consequently, housing demand remained soft, prices are rising, consumer sentiment has weakened, and home sales are declining. The U.S. Federal Reserve continues continues to take action intended to address inflation. The Federal Reserve Board maintained the federal funds rate at 533 basis points from August of 2023 through mid-September 2024, when it was reduced to 483 basis points. In February 2025,2026, the federal funds rate was 433 364 basis points. The fluctuations impact interest rates, which significantly contribute to mortgage rate adjustments. During the second half of 2022, the benchmark 30 year fixed conforming mortgage rate rose above 6% for the first time since 2008, according to Freddie Mac data, and reached a peak of about 8% during the second half of 2023. That interest rate sat in between 6.62% and 6.85% during 2024. Consequently, housing demand remained soft, prices are rising, consumer sentiment has weakened, and home sales are declining. In February 2025,2026, the the existing home sales market decreased 1.2% compared to February 20242025 according to the NAR. This decline had an adverse impact on consumer demand for our services, as consumers weighed the financial implications of selling or purchasing a home. Continuing poor housing market conditions would adversely affect our operating performance and results of operations.

Reworded

Recent developments in the real estate industry have seen increased scrutiny and legal challenges related to the structure of real estate agent commissions. Legal actions and regulatory inquiries have been initiated to examine the fairness, transparency, and potential anticompetitive practices associated with the traditional commission model. Courts and regulatory bodies may be increasingly focused on ensuring transparency in commission structures, potentially leading to reforms that impact the earnings and business models of real estate professionals. Changes in legislation or legal precedents could impact the standard practices of commission-sharing between listing agents and buyer’s agents and and may adversely affect our business model and revenues. On October 31, 2023, a federal jury in Missouri found that NAR and certain companies conspired to artificially inflate brokerage commissions, which violates federal antitrust law. The judgment was appealed on October 31, 2023, while these and other plaintiffs have filed similar lawsuits against a number of other large real estate brokerage companies. We have not, as of the date hereof, been named as a defendant in any antitrust litigation. On or about March 15, 2024, NAR agreed to settle these lawsuits, by agreeing to pay $418 million over approximately four years, and changing certain of its rules surrounding agent commissions. This settlement resolves claims against NAR and nearly every NAR member; all state, territorial and local REALTOR® associations; all association-owned MLSs; and all brokerages with an NAR member as principal whose residential transaction volume in 2022 was $2 billion or below and is subject to court approval. Due to this litigation, there will be rule changes for the NAR. In the settlement, effective mid-July 2024, NAR has agreed to put in place a new rule prohibiting offers of compensation on the MLS, as well as adopt new rules requiring written agreements between buyers and buyers’ agents. However, the direct and indirect effects, if any, of the judgment upon the real estate industry are not yet entirely clear.

Added

On October 31, 2023, in the matter of Burnett v. National Association of Realtors (U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri), a federal jury found the NAR and certain other remaining brokerage defendants liable for $1.8 billion in damages on claims that these companies conspired to artificially inflate brokerage commissions, which is in violation of federal antitrust law (the “Burnett Ruling”). The verdict was appealed on October 31, 2023. Additionally, certain other brokerage defendants settled with the plaintiffs, including both monetary and non-monetary settlement terms. That same day, the NAR, EXP World Holdings, Inc., Compass, Inc., Redfin Corporation, Weichert Realtors, United Real Estate, Howard Hann Real Estate Services, Douglas Elliman, Inc., The Keyes Company, Illustrated Properties, LLC, Baird & Warner, Inc., Real Estate One, Inc., and others were named as defendants in Gibson v. National Association of Realtors (U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri), alleging a similar fact pattern and antitrust violations. On or about March 15, 2024, NAR agreed to settle the Burnett Ruling, along with a sister litigation, by agreeing to pay $418 million over approximately four years, and changing certain of its rules surrounding agent commissions. On November 26, 2024, the NAR Settlement was granted over objections, The final approval order is currently being appealed. If the NAR Settlement is sustained on appeal, it is expected to resolve claims against the NAR and certain companies related to this matter. The terms of the NAR Settlement provide that NAR has agreed to put in place a new rule prohibiting offers of compensation on the MLS, as well as adopt new rules requiring written agreements between buyers and buyers’ agents.

Added

On March 22, 2024, real estate brokerage company Compass Inc. (“Compass”) announced that it will pay $57.5 million as part of a proposed settlement to resolve lawsuits over real estate commissions and agreed to change its business practices to ensure clients can more easily understand how brokers and agents are compensated for their services. Compass’s motion for final approval of the settlement agreement was granted on October 31, 2024 and the settlement agreement is now effective. The final approval ruling was appealed by certain class members that objected to the settlement and is now pending before the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. In the same litigation, the court granted final approval of multiple additional settlements, including (i) an $8.62 million settlement on June 25, 2025 involving The Keyes Company, Illustrated Properties, LLC, Baird & Warner, Inc., Real Estate One, Inc., and other defendants, and (ii) a $42 million settlement on February 5, 2026 involving William Raveis Real Estate Inc., Hanna Holdings Inc., Windermere Real Estate Services Company Inc., Exit Realty Corp. International, Exit Realty Corp. USA, and William L. Lyon & Associates Inc.

Added

These settlements may result in changes in the way real estate brokers are compensated for their services. Most notably, home sellers may no longer be required to pay buyer agent commissions which would result in lower buyer agent compensation. We cannot predict the full breadth of the outcome of these lawsuits but believe that they may result in a significant adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations for the foreseeable future.

Reworded

There could also be furtherThe changes in real estate industry practices. All of this has prompted discussion of changes to rules established by local or state real estate boards or multiple listing services. All of this may require changes to many brokers’ business models, including changes in agent and broker compensation. For example, we will likely have to develop mechanisms and a plan that enable buyers and sellers to negotiate commissions. The Company will continue to monitor ongoing and similar antitrust litigation against our competitors. However, the litigation and its ramifications could cause unforeseen turmoil in our industry, the impacts of which could have a negative effect on us as an industry participant.

Reworded

See Note 1, “Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the Notes to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Comprehensive Form 10-K.

Reworded

Residential real estate services revenue increased $36.574$9.5 million, or 179%,17%, in the year ended December 31, 20242025 against the comparable prior year period. The increase was drivenprimarily byrelated $9.789to $9.8 million of revenue fromdue the seven acquisitions completed during fiscal year 2024, in addition the increase was due to a full year of income from the sixseven acquiredacquisitions companiescompleted in 2023 of $27.166 million. Also, we received a full fiscal year of revenue from the increased transaction fee, monthly agent fee, and annual fee effective September 1, 2023.2024.

Reworded

Franchising services services revenue decreased $554$199 thousand, or 63%,61%, in the year ended December 31, 20242025 against the comparable prior year period. The decrease is primarily attributable to the six franchise acquisitions completed in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2023 and the six franchise acquisitions during fiscal year 2024, which no longer contribute to franchising royalty fees. These fees would have totaled $658 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2024. Our remaining franchisees saw a slight increase in revenue due to market conditions in our residential services stabilizing in 2024, which partially offset the decline in franchising royalty fee revenue. Franchising royalties would be expected to decline as the acquisition of additional franchises continues.

Reworded

Coaching services revenue declined slightly by $60$125 thousandthousand, duringor 22%, in the year ended December 31, 20242025 against the comparable prior year period. This is attributable to structural changes to increasea recruitmentshift andin NARfocus relatedby matters.management in the agent plans to focus on agent count growth that does not require coaching. This was done in anticipation of boosting transaction volume.

Reworded

Property management revenue increased $1.435$47 million,thousand, or 15%,13%, in the year ended December 31, 20242025 against the comparable prior year period primarily due to increases in theapplication numberfees ofdespite a reduction in total properties under management from 600 in 2023 to 650 in 2024 along with the full year benefit in 2024 of a management fee price increase effective September 1, 2023 from $44 to $55 in 2024 per agent property.managed.

Added

Real Estate Brokerage Services (Commercial)

Added

Residential real estate services revenue increased $366 thousand, or 112%, in the year ended December 31, 2025 against the comparable prior year period. The increase was driven mostly organically due to a change in the segments management.

Added

Title Settlement and Insurance

Added

Revenues increased $215 thousand, or 259%, in the year ended December 31, 2025 against the comparable prior year period. The increase is due to reporting full year of revenue for the first time since this segment was acquired in August of 2024.

Reworded

CostsThe percentage of gross margin remained the same year over year. Gross margin related to residential real estate brokerage services increased $924 $3.654 million,thousand, or 217%,17%, in the year ended December 31, 20242025 against the comparable prior year period. The increase was driven in part by $8,945an increase in revenue of $9.5 million ofand a related cost of revenue increase of $8.6 million primarily from the seven acquisitions completed during fiscal year 2024. In addition we saw a full year impact from the six acquisitions from the 4th Quarter of 2023. The gross profit increased $3.654 million, or 216.7%, from 2023 to 2024 primarily attributable to the fee increases enacted in September of 2023 and gross profit from acquisitions. Due to these factors ourTherefore, gross margin increasedremained torelatively 9.4%constant compared to our 2023 gross margin of 8.2%.year-over-year.

Added

The percentage of gross margin declined by 114.1%. Gross margin related to franchising services declined by $52 thousand. The decline is attributable to the acquisitions of the seven acquisitions in 2024 related to franchises. As a result, this decreased the franchising revenues and costs though not necessarily proportionally due to changes in aspects of cost of sales.

Removed

The Company uses external software that supports the Company’s franchises, which is directly used to manage real estate transactions that generates revenue. The software is classified as a cost of revenue, and the Company expects to continue to use the software for a significant portion of 2025, with internally developed options coming online in the latter half of 2025. The decrease in cost of franchising revenue is due to the six acquisitions from 2023 and six from 2024, which no longer contribute to the cost of franchising revenue, as well as a reduction of price per usage of the software costs based on our review of usage of the software in 2023. The gross profit decreased $570 thousand, or 138.7%, from 2023 to 2024 primarily attributable to the reduction in the cost of revenue.

Added

The percentage of gross margin declined by 5.8%. Gross margin related to coaching services declined by $82 thousand, primarily due to a change in operations which do not require the coaching services for certain plans, to expediate onboarding, therefore this resulted in the overall reduction of coaching revenues and cost of sales throughout 2025 as compared to 2024.

Removed

Costs related to coaching services decreased $20 thousand, or 6.1%, in the year ended December 31, 2024 against the comparable prior year period. Costs related to coaching services moved proportionally with the change in related revenue. Gross profit decreased by $40 thousand, or 13.5%, due to new initiatives to drive recruiting which impacted coaching programs.

Reworded

CostsThe percentage of gross margin declined by 77.5%. Gross margin related to property management services increaseddeclined $1.424by million,$23 or 15.2%, inthousand the year ended December 31, 20242025 against the comparable prior year period. The increase in property management costs were primarilyis related to fixed costs of sales that did not change while the increasenumber inof properties under management.management The gross margin is consistent from 2023 to 2024.declined.

Added

Real Estate Brokerage Services (Commercial)

Added

The percentage of gross margin declined year over year. Gross margin related to commercial real estate brokerage services increased $33 thousand, or 37%, in the year ended December 31, 2025, against the comparable prior year period. The change was driven in part by an increase in revenue of $366 thousand and a related cost of revenue increase of $333 thousand primarily from organic growth.

Added

Title Settlement and Insurance

Added

The percentage of gross margin increased by 259%. Gross margin related to title settlement and insurance increased by $215 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2025 against the comparable prior year period due to a full year of activity as this segment was acquired in August of 2024.

Removed

NM: Not Meaningful

Reworded

Payroll and benefits increased $1.9 $1.7 million or 78%,40%, in the year ended December 31, 20242025 against the comparable prior year period primarily due to benefits offered and headcount increases and certain one-time bonuses paid to changesour in the executive management team, bonus, payroll taxes and acquisitions from the 4th quarter of 2023 and during 2024. In addition, headcount increases to facilitate growth and replace 3rd party costs.executives.

Added

Rent and occupancy increased $472 thousand or 44% in the year ended December 31, 2025 against the comparable prior year period due to the seven acquisitions in 2024.

Removed

Rent and occupancy increased as the Company leases its corporate office and other offices from various entities. With $669 thousand of the total increase of $724 thousand related to the acquisitions from the fourth quarter of 2023 and companies acquired in 2024.

Reworded

Professional fees increased $1.334 $1.6 million, or 513%,103%, in the year ended December 31, 20242025 against the comparable prior year period. Primarily thisThis increase iswas primarily relateddue to $666,390 ofprofessional and legal costfees incurred related to acquisitions,financing litigationtransactions andentered SECinto reporting. Secondarily, an increase of $523,191 in fees related to the company and other professional accounting services related to audits and acquisitions.2025.

Added

Office and technology costs increased by $242 thousand, or 66%, in the year ended December 31, 2025 against the comparable prior year period. This is primarily due to one-time costs related to upgrading our accounting and internally developed customer resource applications.

Removed

Office and technology costs decreased by $56 thousand due to the Company’s efforts to curtail expenses and improve productivity and efficiency. In particular, the Company streamlined its software applications, which reduced technology costs after subscription periods ended.

Reworded

Insurance, training and other costs increaseddecreased $54 thousand, or 9%, in 2024the primarilyyear ended December 31, 2025 against the comparable prior year period. This is due to our new directorsfavorable contracts and officersusing (D&O)alternative policiesless thatcostly provideproviders liabilityfor coverage.trainings.

Added

Public company costs decreased $470 thousand in the year ended December 31, 2025 against the comparable prior year period. This is due to a reduction in cost related to investor relations and cost related to acquisition activity.

Added

Additionally, as part of total operating cost the Company recognized in December 31, 2025 and 2024, there were impairments of intangible and goodwill for $6,911,134 and $787,438, respectively, due to triggering conditions.

Removed

Public company cost increased due to fees paid to the Board of Directors of $231 thousand, investor relation and related of $357 thousand.

Removed

Additionally, as part of total operating cost the Company recognized impairment of goodwill for $787 thousand due to triggering conditions as described in Note 4 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets, triggering events were noted on October 1, 2024 with the most significant event share price performance. We further evaluated triggering events through December 31, 2024 and determined no further impairment was necessary.

Added

We incurred stock-based compensation of $5.0 million in 2025 based mostly upon restricted stock units granted to consultants ($1.8), agents and employees ($0.5 million) and option grants and restricted Common Stock awards to our CEO pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement and 2022 Plan ($2.7 million).

Reworded

We incurred stock-based compensation of $4.7 million in 2024 based upon restricted stock units granted to agents and employees,employees ($1.0$0.8 million), consultants who provided various services to the company ($1.4 million), and an option grant to our CEO pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement ($2.3$2.1 million). During 2023, we incurred stock-based compensation of $5.1 million in 2023 based upon restricted stock units granted to agents and employees, most of which was part of the IPO ($1.998 million), consultants who provided various services to the company ($1.286 million), option awards to non-management directors ($421 thousand), and an option grant to our CEOCOO pursuant to the terms of hisher employment agreement ($1.395 million$400,000).

Added

Other expense, net for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $10.1 million compared to other expense, net of $3.2 million for the comparable prior year. The 2025 expense was mostly due to $15.4 million in expenses related to our convertible debt and associated warrants, partially off-set by a $4.0 million gain on the extinguishment of debt and a $0.9 million change in the fair value of derivative liabilities.

Removed

Other expense, net for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $3.15 million compared to other expense, net of $0.7 million for the comparable prior year. The 2024 expense was mostly due to a $1.47 million change in the fair value of derivative liabilities, $0.7 million loss on extinguishment of debt and $0.4 million for the amortization of discount on debt instruments. The 2023 expense was due to costs related to the amortization of financing fees on convertible debt instruments with embedded equity elements issued in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022 along with interest expense associated with the existing debt issuances in 2022, partially offset by a decrease in the revaluation of the derivative liabilities and the IRS employee retention credit received for prior tax years, net of legal costs to obtain the credit.

Added

On February 4, 2025, the Company and an institutional investor entered into the securities purchase agreement, pursuant to which the Company issued to the 2025 Investor: (i) the Initial Note in the original principal amount of $5,500,000 maturing on February 4, 2027; and (ii) sixteen (16) Incremental Warrants, each to purchase additional Notes in an original principal amount up to $2,500,000 at an exercise price of $2,256,250, in substantially the same form as the Initial Note. The purchase price paid by the 2025 Investor under the agreement for the Initial Note and Incremental Warrants was $4,963,750, of which $910,250, $496,191 and $148,724 were used to assume or extinguish other debt for net proceeds of $3,408,585. Remaining funds from the offering were used by the Company to pay-off certain indebtedness of the Company, pay certain outstanding fees and expenses (including expenses of the offering, and fees payable to the placement agent and advisors), acquisitions and general corporate purposes. Of the proceeds from the offering, $354,450 was paid to satisfy, in full, the remaining balance of the standard merchant cash advance agreements with Cedar Advance, LLC, $340,421 was paid to satisfy, in full, the remaining balance of the standard merchant cash advance agreement with Arin Funding, LLC and $910,250 was paid to satisfy, in full, the remaining balance of the senior secured promissory notes with an accredited investor. On June 18, 2025, the Company and 2025 Investor entered into the Exchange Agreement, pursuant to which (among other things) the 2025 Investor surrendered and exchanged all of its Incremental Warrants in exchange for 6,000 shares of the Series B Preferred Stock. The 2025 Investor fully converted the Initial Note, and the Company issued the 2025 Investor 8,215 in 2025 and 750 shares in the first quarter of 2026 for an aggregate of 8,965 shares of Common Stock upon such conversion. See Note 8 – Borrowings to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further disclosure.

Added

In addition to the debt pay downs during the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company eliminated all warrants tied to the investor senior secured promissory notes outstanding as of December 31,2024. Two of the three warrants were exercised on a cashless basis, with the third warrant being bought back by the Company in the amount of $379,083, fully eliminating these unfavorable ratchet warrants.

Removed

In February 2024, we entered into securities purchase agreement with an accredited investor for the issuance of a 13% senior secured promissory note with a principal amount of $1,052,632 and a purchase price of $1,000,000 after an original issue discount of $52,632. The note was convertible into shares of our Common Stock at the option of the lender. In addition, on April 1, 2024, we entered into securities purchase agreement with the same accredited investor for the issuance of a 13% senior secured promissory note with a principal amount of $1,316,000 and a purchase price of $1,250,200 after an original issue discount of $65,800. The note was convertible into shares of our Common Stock at the option of the lender. The two promissory notes began amortizing five months after the date of each loan, with full maturity occurring twelve months after the date of each loan.

Removed

In May 2024, we entered into a standard merchant cash advance agreement with Cedar Advance LLC (“Cedar”) where we sold in the aggregate $761,250 in future receipts of the Company for $500,000. Until the purchase price has been repaid, the Company agreed to pay Cedar $23,000 per week.

Removed

In July 2024, we received $444,600 in net proceeds, excluding debt issuance costs of approximately $25,000, through our private sale of a 13% OID senior secured promissory note in the principal amount of $468,000 for a purchase price of $444,600 to the same accredited investor in our February 2024 and April 2024 private placements.

Removed

In August 2024, we received $725,000 in net proceeds, excluding equity issuance costs of approximately $25,000, by issuing 761,689 shares of Common stock and a pre-funded warrant to purchase 509,498 shares of Common stock pursuant to a securities purchase agreement with an institutional accredited investor, Brown Stone Capital Ltd., at a price equal to $0.59 per share.

Removed

In September 2024, we entered into a promissory note for the principal amount of $200,000. The promissory note bore interest at 12.5% per annum. The note is payable in three monthly installments of $75,000, beginning on November 1, 2024, with subsequent payments due on December 1, 2024, and January 1, 2025.

Removed

In October 2024, we entered into a standard merchant cash advance agreement with Arin Funding LLC (“Arin”) where we sold in the aggregate $588,000 in future receipts of the Company for $420,000. Until the purchase price has been repaid, the Company agreed to pay Arin $15,474 per week.

Removed

In October 2024, we entered into a standard merchant cash advance agreement with Cedar where we sold in the aggregate $616,250 in future receipts of the Company for $403,750. Until the purchase price has been repaid, the Company agreed to pay Cedar $15,400 per week. A portion of the funds provided were used to pay off the remaining balance of $301,250 of the May 2024 cash advance agreement.

Reworded

InDuring the Novemberyear 2024,ended weDecember entered into31, an2025, ATMthe AgreementCompany withreceived A.G.P./Allianceproceeds Global Partners, as sales agent, relating tofrom the sale of Common Stock. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we issued an aggregate of 222,0003,871 shares of Common Stock pursuant to suchits sales agreement with AGP (“ATM Agreement for net proceeds”) of $169,236. We$7,496,361. The Company paid the sales agent compensation with respect to sale of such shares in the amount of $5,728.$105,885.

Showing the first 60 of 82 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-08-21 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-07-31 (period ending 2026-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

10new paragraphs
3removed paragraphs
4reworded paragraphs
1,441 → 1,681words in section

New heading “We are subject to risks related to concentration of significant portion of our assets in digital form, stablecoin exposure as well as risks associated with the custodian's operational performance, security controls, financial condition, and ability to safeguard and facilitate access to our assets.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: delist, liquidity
“In July 2026, the SEC approved Nasdaq's rule requiring companies listed on the Nasdaq Global Market and Nasdaq Capital Market to maintain a minimum market value of listed securities (“MVLS”) of at least $5 million. Under this rule, if a company's MVLS remains below $5 million for 30 consecutive business days, Nasdaq may immediately suspend trading in and commence delisting of the company's securities. Unlike some other Nasdaq listing deficiencies, this rule does not provide an opportunity to regain compliance prior to suspension, and a hearing request does not stay the suspension of trading. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: delist, liquidity
“As of the date of this report, our MVLS is below $5 million. Accordingly, if the stay is lifted, the rule becomes effective, and we are unable to satisfy the MVLS requirement, our securities would become subject to suspension and delisting from Nasdaq. Such a suspension or delisting could materially reduce the liquidity and market price of our Common Stock, impair our ability to raise capital, reduce analyst coverage, and adversely affect our business and the value of an investment in our securities.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: cybersecurity incident, liquidity
“Any disruption affecting frxUSD, including a loss of confidence by market participants, reduced liquidity, redemption limitations, operational failures, cybersecurity incidents, governance disputes, regulatory actions, reserve-related concerns, or other adverse developments, could result in a decline in the value or marketability of our digital assets. If frxUSD were to experience a significant de-pegging event or become subject to restrictions on transfer or redemption, we could incur losses and our ability to access liquidity could be materially adversely affected.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: delist
“Additionally, on July 22, 2026, the SEC approved a new Nasdaq continued listing requirement applicable to companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market that would require listed companies to maintain a minimum MVLS of at least $5.0 million. Under the approved rule, if a company's MVLS remains below $5.0 million for 30 consecutive business days, Nasdaq will issue a Staff Delisting Determination and immediately suspend trading in the company's securities and commence delisting proceedings. …”
see in full comparison
New text
“We are subject to risks related to concentration of significant portion of our assets in digital form, stablecoin exposure as well as risks associated with the custodian's operational performance, security controls, financial condition, and ability to safeguard and facilitate access to our assets.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: liquidity
“As of June 30, 2026, a substantial portion of our assets consisted of restricted digital assets held pursuant to our financing arrangements. Our digital asset holdings are highly concentrated in frxUSD, a stablecoin whose value, liquidity, and utility depend on the continued operation, financial condition, governance, and market acceptance of the issuer and related protocol. Although frxUSD is designed to maintain a stable value, there can be no assurance that it will remain fully redeemable, maintain its intended peg, or continue to be widely accepted in the marketplace.”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (17)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

On JulyAugust 13,20, 2026, the closing price of our Common Stock was $1.01.$0.5636 . Pursuant to Nasdaq Rule 5810(c)(3)(A)(iii), if the closing price of our Common Stock is $0.10 or less for 10 consecutive trading days, we will be issued a Staff Delisting Determination by Nasdaq. If we receive a Staff Delisting Determination Letter resulting from our Common Stock trading at or below $0.10 for 10 consecutive trading days, we will have 7 calendar days to request a hearing before a Nasdaq hearings panel to review the Staff Delisting Determination, which will determine the delisting of our Common Stock by Nasdaq. A hearing would then take place within 45 days of the hearing request to determine whether or not our Common Stock would be delisted. If, in the future, we receive a Staff Delisting Determination there can be no assurance that we would be successful in preventing a determination by the Nasdaq hearing panel that our stock will be delisted.

Removed

On April 16, 2026, the Company received a notice (the “10-K Notice”) from the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Department (the “Staff”) that the Company is not in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5250(c)(1) as a result of its failure to timely file its Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Comprehensive Form 10-K”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 (the “Initial Delinquent Filing”) with the SEC. The Staff informed the Company that, under Nasdaq rules, the Company has 60 calendar days, or until June 15, 2026 to submit a plan to regain compliance, and if the Staff accepts such plan, they can grant an exception of up to 180 calendar days from the Initial Delinquent Filing’s due date (or until October 12, 2026) to regain compliance. On May 21, 2026, the Company also received a notice (the “10-Q Notice,” and together with the 10-K Notice, the “Notices”) from the Staff indicating that the Company is not in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5250(c)(1) due to its failure to timely file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2026, and noting that the Company also remains delinquent in filing its Initial Delinquent Filing. The 10-Q Notice further states that, in accordance with Nasdaq rules and as previously communicated in the 10-K Notice, the Company has until June 15, 2026 to submit a plan (the “Filing Plan”) to regain compliance, and if the Staff accepts such plan, any exception granted will be limited to a maximum of 180 calendar days from the due date of the Initial Delinquent Filing, or until October 12, 2026, to regain compliance.

Removed

On June 4, 2026, the Company filed Comprehensive Form 10-K with the SEC. On June 10, 2026, the Company received a letter from the Staff indicating that based on the June 4, 2026 filing of the Form 10-K, the Staff has determined that the Company complies with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5250(c)(1) with regard to the Form 10-K filing. However, since it has not received the Company’s Form 10-Q, the Company remains noncompliant Nasdaq Listing Rule 5250(c)(1). On June 11, 2026, the Company submitted to Nasdaq the Filing Plan addressing how the Company intends to regain compliance with Nasdaq’s listing rules with respect to the delinquent reports, and Nasdaq has the discretion to grant the Company up to 180 calendar days from the due date of the Form 10-K, or October 12, 2026, to regain compliance.

Reworded

On June 10, 2026, the Companywe received a letter from the Staff indicating that, because the Company’sour stockholders’ equity as reported in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 was $(1,848,252), thewe Company isare no longer in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(1), which requires companies listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market to maintain a minimum of $2,500,000 in stockholders’ equity for continued listing. Nasdaq’s letter provides the Company with 45 calendar days, or untilOn July 27, 2026, we submitted to submitNasdaq a plan to regainof compliance (“SEaddressing Plan,”how andwe together with the Filing Plan, the “Plans”). The Company is currently evaluating its available optionsintend to resolve the deficiency and regain compliance with the Nasdaq minimumListing stockholders’Rule equity5550(b)(1). requirement.If the plan is accepted, we can be granted up to 180 calendar days from the date of the letter (or until December 7, 2026) to evidence compliance.

Added

On August 21, 2026, the Company received a notice from the Staff that the Company was not in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5250(c)(1) as a result of its failure to timely file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2026 with the SEC. The Staff informed the Company that, under Nasdaq rules, the Company has 60 calendar days, or until October 20, 2026, to submit a plan to regain compliance, and if the Staff accepts such plan, it may grant an exception of up to 180 calendar days from the filing due date, or until February 16, 2027, to regain compliance.

Reworded

There can be no assurance that the Companywe will be able to regain or maintain compliance with all applicable continued listing requirements or that its PlansNasdaq will be acceptedaccept byour theplan Nasdaq.of compliance.

Added

Additionally, on July 22, 2026, the SEC approved a new Nasdaq continued listing requirement applicable to companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market that would require listed companies to maintain a minimum MVLS of at least $5.0 million. Under the approved rule, if a company's MVLS remains below $5.0 million for 30 consecutive business days, Nasdaq will issue a Staff Delisting Determination and immediately suspend trading in the company's securities and commence delisting proceedings. Unlike many other Nasdaq continued listing standards, the rule does not provide a compliance or cure period before a delisting determination is issued. Although a company may appeal a delisting determination, the appeal generally does not stay the suspension of trading, and the company's securities would generally trade on an over-the-counter market during the appeals process. In addition, any exception that may be granted by a Nasdaq Hearings Panel is very limited. However, on July 29, 2026, the SEC notified Nasdaq that it had received notices of intention to petition for review of the approval order and, pursuant to Rule 431(e) of the SEC's Rules of Practice, the effectiveness of the approval order was automatically stayed pending further review by the SEC. As a result, the ultimate implementation, timing and scope of the MVLS requirement remain uncertain.

Added

As of the date of this report, our MVLS is below $5 million. Accordingly, if the stay is lifted, the rule becomes effective, and we are unable to satisfy the MVLS requirement, our securities would become subject to suspension and delisting from Nasdaq. Such a suspension or delisting could materially reduce the liquidity and market price of our Common Stock, impair our ability to raise capital, reduce analyst coverage, and adversely affect our business and the value of an investment in our securities.

Added

We are subject to risks related to concentration of significant portion of our assets in digital form, stablecoin exposure as well as risks associated with the custodian's operational performance, security controls, financial condition, and ability to safeguard and facilitate access to our assets.

Added

A significant portion of our assets consists of digital assets, primarily frxUSD, which are subject to unique risks that could adversely affect our financial condition, liquidity, and results of operations.

Added

As of June 30, 2026, a substantial portion of our assets consisted of restricted digital assets held pursuant to our financing arrangements. Our digital asset holdings are highly concentrated in frxUSD, a stablecoin whose value, liquidity, and utility depend on the continued operation, financial condition, governance, and market acceptance of the issuer and related protocol. Although frxUSD is designed to maintain a stable value, there can be no assurance that it will remain fully redeemable, maintain its intended peg, or continue to be widely accepted in the marketplace.

Added

Any disruption affecting frxUSD, including a loss of confidence by market participants, reduced liquidity, redemption limitations, operational failures, cybersecurity incidents, governance disputes, regulatory actions, reserve-related concerns, or other adverse developments, could result in a decline in the value or marketability of our digital assets. If frxUSD were to experience a significant de-pegging event or become subject to restrictions on transfer or redemption, we could incur losses and our ability to access liquidity could be materially adversely affected.

Added

In addition, our digital assets are held with a single third-party custodian and are subject to contractual restrictions under our financing arrangements. As a result, we are exposed to risks associated with the custodian's operational performance, security controls, financial condition, and ability to safeguard and facilitate access to our assets. Any failure, interruption, insolvency, cyberattack, fraud, or other adverse event affecting the custodian could impair our ability to access, transfer, liquidate, or realize value from these assets in a timely manner, or at all.

Added

The regulatory environment applicable to stablecoins and other digital assets remains uncertain and continues to evolve. Future legislative, regulatory, enforcement, accounting, tax, or other governmental actions could adversely affect the issuance, custody, transferability, liquidity, valuation, or use of frxUSD and other digital assets. Any such developments could reduce the value of our digital assets, limit our ability to utilize them in our operations or financing arrangements, and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Added

Because our digital asset holdings represent a significant concentration of assets, any adverse development affecting frxUSD, the related protocol, the custodian, or the broader digital asset market could have a disproportionate impact on our liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations.

Removed

In July 2026, the SEC approved Nasdaq's rule requiring companies listed on the Nasdaq Global Market and Nasdaq Capital Market to maintain a minimum market value of listed securities (“MVLS”) of at least $5 million. Under this rule, if a company's MVLS remains below $5 million for 30 consecutive business days, Nasdaq may immediately suspend trading in and commence delisting of the company's securities. Unlike some other Nasdaq listing deficiencies, this rule does not provide an opportunity to regain compliance prior to suspension, and a hearing request does not stay the suspension of trading. As of the date of this report, our MVLS is below $5 million. In addition, the market value of our Common Stock may fluctuate significantly due to factors beyond our control, including market conditions, investor sentiment toward small-cap companies, our operating performance, and general economic conditions. If our MVLS remains below the required threshold for the applicable period, our Common Stock could be immediately suspended from trading and delisted from Nasdaq. Such a suspension or delisting could materially reduce the liquidity and market price of our Common Stock, impair our ability to raise capital, reduce analyst coverage, and adversely affect our business and the value of an investment in our securities.

Reworded

Except as disclosed above in this Section “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” there have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 filed with the SEC on June 4, 2026 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2026 filed with the SEC on July 31, 2026.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

30new paragraphs
33removed paragraphs
32reworded paragraphs
9,431 → 7,473words in section

New heading “Cancelled Transactions”

New heading “Three Months Ending June 30”

New heading “Six Months Ending June 30”

New heading “Three Months Ending June 30”

New heading “Six Months Ending June 30”

New heading “Three Months Ending June 30”

New heading “Six Months Ending June 30”

Removed heading “Departure and Appointment of the Board Members”

Removed heading “Convertible Note Facility, Redemption Agreement, and Series X Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation”

Removed heading “Investments in Digital Assets”

Removed heading “January 2026 Reverse Stock Split”

Removed heading “Disposition of LR Kissimmee”

Removed heading “Acquisition of Remaining Interest in Lakeland”

Removed heading “Amendments to Officers Employment Agreements”

Removed heading “Land Purchase Agreement”

Removed heading “Series C Preferred Stock Financing”

Removed heading “Potential Acquisition of Consensus Core Technologies, Inc”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

Removed text topics: default, covenant, interest rate
“On January 8, 2026, the Company consummated the initial closing (the “Initial Closing”) under the Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which it issued the Investors a senior secured convertible note in the principal amount of $11,000,000 (the “Initial Note”), together with a previously issued Token Right, for an aggregate purchase price of $9,900,000. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: going concern, liquidity
“The Company entered into the Purchase Agreement and transactions contemplated thereby to secure immediate and committed access to capital at a time when alternative financing sources were either unavailable or significantly more dilutive and restrictive. The facility was intended to provide critical liquidity to support ongoing operations, address going concern considerations, and preserve enterprise value. In addition, the Company sought to strengthen its balance sheet and position itself to deploy capital into strategic initiatives, including investments in stablecoins, A.I. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: fine, ai
“On March 24, 2026, the Company and Investors entered into an Amendment to the Purchase Agreement to provide that the net proceeds to the Company from any further equity line of credit, equity purchase facility, or at-the-market offering shall be allocated as follows: …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: covenant, competition
“Under the COO Amendment, Mrs. La Rosa agreed to a reduction in her base salary from $250,000 to $100,000 per annum, in consideration of which the Company agreed to revise certain restrictive covenants of the COO Employment Agreement so that Mrs. La Rosa’s non-competition restrictions were effective only during the term of her employment with the Company, and the period of non-solicitation restriction was reduced from twenty-four (24) to twelve (12) post-employment. These changes became effective on March 15, 2026.”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: ai, regulation
“As described above, on January 8, 2026, we consummated the Initial Closing pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. We agreed to use majority of net proceeds from the closings under the Purchase Agreement and any equity line of credit, equity purchase facility or at-the-market offering to acquire cryptocurrency in the form that the Investors and Company have mutually agreed to in writing as a digital asset for the Company’s balance sheet. We have further agreed with the Investors that we will acquire stablecoins as these digital assets. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“Convertible Note Facility, Redemption Agreement, and Series X Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (95)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Our real estate brokerage offices, both corporate and franchised, are staffed with 2,9792,807 licensed real estate brokers and sales associates as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026.

Removed

Departure and Appointment of the Board Members

Removed

On February 5, 2026, Michael La Rosa resigned from the Board, and upon recommendation of the Nominating Committee, on February 10, 2026, the Board appointed Mr. Jaime Cosculluela as a member of the Board.

Removed

Convertible Note Facility, Redemption Agreement, and Series X Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation

Removed

On November 12, 2025, the Company and the certain institutional investors (“Investors”) entered into the Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to, among other things, issue and sell, and the Investors agreed to purchase, in multiple closings, a new series of senior secured convertible notes of the Company in an aggregate original principal amount of up to $250,000,000, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain closing conditions. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, on November 12, 2025, the Company issued a Token Right (the “Token Right”) to certain Investors, pursuant to which upon exercise of the Token Right and for no further consideration the holder will be entitled to receive an aggregate number of Right Tokens (as defined therein) equal to the sum of (i) fifty percent (50%) of any and all Tokens (as defined in the Token Right) purchased by the Company using the net proceeds of each closing of the Purchase Agreement and (ii) twenty-five percent (25%) of any and all Tokens purchased by the Company using the net proceeds of any Other Financing (as defined therein).

Removed

In connection with the Purchase Agreement, on November 12, 2025, the Company and Mr. La Rosa entered into a redemption agreement (“Redemption Agreement”), pursuant to which, on the initial closing date of the Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to redeem and immediately cancel and return to the status of “blank check” preferred stock of the Company, certain number of Mr. La Rosa’s shares of Series X Super Voting Preferred Stock (“Series X Preferred Stock”) such that, immediately after such redemption, he will own shares of Series X Preferred Stock representing not less than 80% of the total voting power of the Company for a redemption price of $2,000,000 payable upon such redemption, and $500,000 contingently payable upon the satisfaction of certain conditions. Mr. La Rosa’s remaining shares of Series X Preferred Stock will be redeemable by the Company at a subsequent time determined by the Board or otherwise as set forth in the Redemption Agreement for no additional consideration. These redemptions of the Series X Preferred Stock were conditioned upon stockholders’ approval and effectiveness of the Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation (the “Series X Certificate of Amendment”) to provide that the shares of the Series X Preferred Stock may be redeemed from time to time and at any time in whole or in part upon such terms and conditions as may be approved by the Board and agreed to by the holder(s) thereof. Upon effectiveness of respective stockholders’ approval on December 25, 2025, such Series X Certificate of Amendment was effective as of December 26, 2025.

Removed

On January 8, 2026, the Company consummated the initial closing (the “Initial Closing”) under the Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which it issued the Investors a senior secured convertible note in the principal amount of $11,000,000 (the “Initial Note”), together with a previously issued Token Right, for an aggregate purchase price of $9,900,000. The Initial Note is convertible into shares of Common Stock, at an initial conversion price equal to $8.347, subject to adjustment as provided in the Initial Note, provided that in no event may the conversion price be less than the floor price of $7.78, which will be lowered pursuant to the terms of the Initial Note for the Initial Note and all other notes (together, the “Notes”) upon the effectiveness of the stockholders’ approval of such reduction (the “Floor Price”). The Initial Note bears interest at a rate of ten percent (10%) per annum that is payable monthly in arrears commencing on February 1, 2026, matures twenty-four (24) months from the date of issuance and contains customary covenants and events of default (upon which the interest rate will increase to a rate of nineteen percent (19%) per annum) as described in the Initial Note.

Removed

In connection with the Initial Closing on January 8, 2026, as contemplated under the Purchase Agreement: (i) the Company and each of its subsidiaries (each, a “Grantor”), and a collateral agent (the “Collateral Agent”) for the benefit of the holders of Obligations (as defined in the Security Agreement), entered into a Security and Pledge Agreement (the “Security Agreement”) with respect to the Notes, pursuant to which each Grantor granted the Collateral Agent, for the benefit of the Secured Parties (as defined in the Security Agreement), a security interest in such Grantor’s right, title and interest in and to all or substantially all of its properties and assets, or in which or to which such Grantor has any rights, whether then owned or thereafter acquired by such Grantor, wherever located, and whether now or hereafter existing or arising (collectively, the “Collateral”); (ii) each subsidiary of the Company also entered into a guarantee agreement (the “Subsidiary Guaranty”) whereby each Subsidiary of the Company guaranteed to the Investors the prompt and full payment and performance of the obligations of the Company and each Subsidiary under the Purchase Agreement and other Transaction Documents; and (iii) the Company and the Collateral Agent entered into an Intellectual Property Security Agreement (“Intellectual Property Security Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company granted to the Collateral Agent a lien and security interest in certain intellectual property of the Company. As a condition to the Initial Closing as provided in the Securities Purchase Agreement on January 5, 2026, the Company and the Collateral Agent also entered into that certain Account Control Agreement.

Removed

The Company received $9,635,000 in net proceeds from the Initial Closing, that were used as follows: (i) $7,000,000 of net proceeds to acquire Note Purchased Crypto (as defined in the Notes) as a digital asset for the Company’s balance sheet, (ii) $2,000,000 of the net proceeds to redeem a portion of the outstanding shares of the Series X Preferred Stock pursuant to the Redemption Agreement, (iii) $500,000 of the net proceeds to be kept in a controlled account to fund the redemption of remaining shares of the Series X Preferred Stock in accordance with the terms of the Redemption Agreement, and (iv) any remaining proceeds, for general corporate purposes, working capital, acquisitions and other strategic transactions. Curvature Securities LLC served as placement agent in connection with the offering.

Removed

On the Initial Closing, pursuant to the terms of the Redemption Agreement, the Company redeemed 200 shares of the Series X Preferred Stock held by Mr. Joseph La Rosa, and the Company and Mr. La Rosa agreed that the Company will pay Mr. La Rosa a portion of the Fixed Redemption Price (as defined in the Redemption Agreement) equal to $1,700,000 immediately after the Initial Closing and the remaining $300,000 of the Fixed Redemption Price will be paid to Mr. La Rosa at a later date to be agreed by the Company and Mr. La Rosa.

Removed

On March 24, 2026, the Company and Investors entered into an Amendment to the Purchase Agreement to provide that the net proceeds to the Company from any further equity line of credit, equity purchase facility, or at-the-market offering shall be allocated as follows: (i) until such time as the Company has paid to its placement agent and financial advisor (together, the “Advisors”) an aggregate of $751,221 in deferred fees, (1) 20% to pay any outstanding deferred fees due to the Advisors, (2) 40% to acquire Note Purchased Crypto (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) as a digital asset for the Company’s balance sheet, and (3) the remaining 40% for general corporate purposes, working capital, acquisitions and other strategic transactions (including, but not limited to, developing next-generation data center infrastructure for AI computing), and (ii) thereafter (1) 50% of the net proceeds shall be used to acquire Note Purchased Crypto as a digital asset for the Company’s balance sheet and (2) the remaining 50% of the net proceeds shall be used for general corporate purposes, working capital, acquisitions and other strategic transactions (including, but not limited to, developing next-generation data center infrastructure for AI computing), including payment of an additional $77,000 in deferred fees to the Advisors due and payable not earlier than December 31, 2026.

Removed

In addition, on March 24, 2026, the Company and Investors entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Token Right (the “Token Right Amendment”), under which the Investor will be entitled to receive upon an aggregate number of Right Tokens equal to the sum of (i) fifty percent (50%) of any and all Tokens purchased by the Company on and after the Issuance Date using the net proceeds of each closing under the Purchase Agreement and (ii) fifty- six and one quarter percent (56.25%) of any and all Tokens purchased by the Company on and after the Issuance Date using the net proceeds of any Other Financing (as defined in the Token Right).

Removed

The Company entered into the Purchase Agreement and transactions contemplated thereby to secure immediate and committed access to capital at a time when alternative financing sources were either unavailable or significantly more dilutive and restrictive. The facility was intended to provide critical liquidity to support ongoing operations, address going concern considerations, and preserve enterprise value. In addition, the Company sought to strengthen its balance sheet and position itself to deploy capital into strategic initiatives, including investments in stablecoins, A.I. infrastructure, and data center opportunities, which management believes have the potential to enhance long-term shareholder value. Unlike traditional financing, the structure allows the Company to draw capital incrementally, providing flexibility to align funding with operational needs and market conditions. While the transaction includes costs such as potential dilution and derivative liabilities, management determined that these were justified given the significant risk to the business if capital was not secured. The transaction was negotiated at arm’s length and, in management’s view, represents a reasonable and necessary financing solution under the circumstances.

Removed

Investments in Digital Assets

Removed

As described above, on January 8, 2026, we consummated the Initial Closing pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. We agreed to use majority of net proceeds from the closings under the Purchase Agreement and any equity line of credit, equity purchase facility or at-the-market offering to acquire cryptocurrency in the form that the Investors and Company have mutually agreed to in writing as a digital asset for the Company’s balance sheet. We have further agreed with the Investors that we will acquire stablecoins as these digital assets. Since January 1, 2026, we used net $6.7 million from the Initial Closing and $3.6 million from our equity line of credit to acquire stablecoins. As of May 31, 2026, we held $10.3 million primarily in the following types of digital assets: FRXUSD and USDC. Our current strategy is to hold stablecoins to preserve the value of the initial investment. During which time we will perform counterparty due diligence potentially using our digital assets for our strategic efforts towards expansion into AI data centers ecosystem. There can be no assurance as to the timing, size, form, or success of this initiative, and it involves significant risks, evolving regulation, financing dilution, and custody or cybersecurity concerns.

Removed

January 2026 Reverse Stock Split

Removed

On November 10, 2025, the Company’s stockholders holding a majority of the voting power of the Company by a written consent approved the amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended, to effect one or more reverse stock splits of the Company’s Common Stock in each case at a ratio in the range of 1-for-5 to 1-for-100, with such ratio to be determined by the Board (“Stockholders Approval”). Such resolution became effective on December 25, 2025, or twenty (20) days after the Company filed with the SEC and mailed to its stockholders respective Information Statement on Schedule 14C on or approximately December 4, 2025. Following such stockholders’ approval, the Company effected a 1-for-10 reverse stock split of the Common Stock, issued and outstanding, effective as of 12:01 a.m. (New York time) on January 26, 2026 (“January 2026 Reverse Stock Split”). As a result of the January 2026 Reverse Stock Split, every ten (10) shares of issued and outstanding Common Stock were automatically combined into one (1) issued and outstanding share of Common Stock.

Removed

Disposition of LR Kissimmee

Removed

On February 4, 2026, the Company sold its 51% membership interest (the “Interest”) in Horeb Kissimmee Realty LLC, a Florida limited liability company (“LR Kissimmee”) to LR Kissimmee’s pre-Transaction 49% owner (the “Buyer”) pursuant to a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the “Sale Agreement”) by and among the Company, the Buyer and LR Kissimmee. Under the Sale Agreement, the Company will receive from the Buyer aggregate cash consideration for the Interest of $500,000, payable in twelve (12) equal monthly installments of $41,667, commencing February 28, 2026. In addition, the Buyer agreed to pay the Company $61,200, representing the Company’s pro rata share of an outstanding loan previously made by LR Kissimmee to the Buyer, payable in four (4) equal quarterly installments of $15,300 commencing on the same date. As a result of the transaction, the Company has fully withdrawn as a member of LR Kissimmee and has no continuing ownership interest therein. In connection with the Transaction, the Company also entered into a Trademark & Brand Licensing Agreement (the “Licensing Agreement”) with LR Kissimmee, pursuant to which the Company granted to LR Kissimmee a non-exclusive, non-transferable license to use certain trademarks and branding of the Company in connection with LR Kissimmee’s real estate brokerage business. The Licensing Agreement provides for a flat monthly licensing fee payable to the Company of $4,500 and has an initial term of one (1) year.

Removed

Acquisition of Remaining Interest in Lakeland

Removed

On February 11, 2026, the Company acquired from the selling member (the “Seller”) all of his 49% membership interest in La Rosa Realty Lakeland LLC, a Florida limited liability company (“Lakeland”), pursuant to a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement and a Settlement Agreement by and among the Company, Joseph La Rosa, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, the Seller, and Lakeland, for aggregate cash consideration of $350,000 (the “Purchase Price”), consisting of (i) an initial payment of $150,000 payable within ten (10) days following the closing, and (ii) installment payments totaling $200,000, payable in twelve (12) equal monthly installments of $16,667 commencing on March 1, 2026. As a result of the transaction, Lakeland became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. As part of the transaction, on February 11, 2026, the Company and the Seller also entered into a Pledge Agreement, pursuant to which, as a security for the unpaid portion of the Purchase Price, the Company granted the Seller a perfected, first-priority security interest in a non-voting 28% economic membership interest in Lakeland.

Removed

Amendments to Officers Employment Agreements

Removed

On February 19, 2026, with the approval of its Board, the Company entered into (i) an Amendment (the “CEO Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated November 12, 2025, with Joseph La Rosa, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”), and (ii) an Amendment (the “COO Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement, dated January 31, 2024 (the “COO Employment Agreement”), with Deana La Rosa, the Company’s Chief Operating Officer (“COO”).

Removed

Under the CEO Amendment, Mr. La Rosa agreed to a reduction in his base salary from $500,000 to $200,000 per annum, in consideration of which the Company agreed to revise certain provisions of the Confidential Information and Invention Assignment Agreement dated April 12, 2022 (the “CIA Agreement”), between Mr. La Rosa and the Company so that Mr. La Rosa’s non-competition restrictions were effective only during the term of his employment with the Company. In addition, the period of non-solicitation restrictions under the CIA Agreement was reduced from twenty-four (24) to twelve (12) months post-employment. These changes became effective on March 15, 2026.

Removed

Under the COO Amendment, Mrs. La Rosa agreed to a reduction in her base salary from $250,000 to $100,000 per annum, in consideration of which the Company agreed to revise certain restrictive covenants of the COO Employment Agreement so that Mrs. La Rosa’s non-competition restrictions were effective only during the term of her employment with the Company, and the period of non-solicitation restriction was reduced from twenty-four (24) to twelve (12) post-employment. These changes became effective on March 15, 2026.

Removed

Land Purchase Agreement

Removed

In February 2026, the Company entered into a contract to acquire a strategically located parcel of land in Osceola County, one of the fastest-growing regions in Central Florida. Upon completion, this acquisition is expected to represent a key milestone in the Company’s expansion strategy and support the development of a Tier III Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) data center designed to address increasing demand for high-performance computing infrastructure. The planned facility is expected to span up to 10,000 square feet and support an estimated IT load of approximately 1,500 kW, positioning it to serve enterprise, cloud, and AI-driven workloads.

Removed

Series C Preferred Stock Financing

Removed

On March 4, 2026, the Company and an institutional investor (the “Investor”) entered into a securities purchase agreement pursuant to which the Company issued the Investor 100 shares of the Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“Series C Preferred Stock”), for a purchase price of $1,000 per share. On the same date, the Company filed respective Certificate of Designation of Rights and Preferences of the Series C Preferred Stock with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada.

Removed

Potential Acquisition of Consensus Core Technologies, Inc

Removed

In March 2026, the Company entered into a non-binding letter of intent to acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding equity interests of Consensus Core Technologies, Inc. (“Consensus”), along with certain of its affiliates and subsidiaries. Consensus is a provider of critical infrastructure solutions for AI and high-performance computing. The proposed acquisition is intended to position the Company at the forefront of the AI infrastructure ecosystem and provide a scalable platform to capitalize on the growing demand for AI compute capacity. The consummation of this transaction is subject to, and contingent upon, the execution of a definitive agreement and other related transaction documents by the parties, corporate approval and customary closing conditions. There can be no assurances that such transaction will be consummated.

Reworded

On April 16, 2026, the Company received a notice (the “10-K Notice”) from the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Department (the “Staff”) that the Company is not in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5250(c)(1) as a result of its failure to timely file its Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Comprehensive Form 10-K”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 (the “Initial Delinquent Filing”) with the SEC. The Staff informed the Company that, under Nasdaq rules, the Company has 60 calendar days, or until June 15, 2026, to submit a plan to regain compliance, and if the Staff accepts such plan, they can grant an exception of up to 180 calendar days from the Initial Delinquent Filing’s due date (or until October 12, 2026) to regain compliance.

Removed

The Notices have no immediate effect on the listing or trading of the Common Stock, which will continue to trade on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “LRHC.”

Reworded

On June 4, 2026, the Company filed Comprehensiveits Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 with the SEC. On June 10, 2026, the Company received a letter from the Staff indicating that based on the June 4, 2026 filing of the Form 10-K, the Staff has determined that the Company complies with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5250(c)(1) with regard to the Form 10-K filing. However,On sinceJuly it31, has2026, notthe Company filed its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2026 with the SEC. On August 4, 2026, the Company received a letter from the Company’sStaff indicating that based on the July 31, 2026 filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Staff has determined that the Company remainscomplies noncompliantwith Nasdaq Listing Rule 5250(c)(1). On June 11, 2026, the Company submitted to Nasdaq a plan of compliance (the “Plan”) addressing how the Company intends to regain compliance with Nasdaq’s listing rules with respect to the delinquent reports, and Nasdaqthis hasmatter theis discretionnow to grant the Company up to 180 calendar days from the due date of the Form 10-K, or October 12, 2026, to regain compliance.closed.

Added

On August 21, 2026, the Company received a notice from the Staff that the Company was not in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5250(c)(1) as a result of its failure to timely file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2026 with the SEC. The Staff informed the Company that, under Nasdaq rules, the Company has 60 calendar days, or until October 20, 2026, to submit a plan to regain compliance, and if the Staff accepts such plan, it may grant an exception of up to 180 calendar days from the filing due date, or until February 16, 2027, to regain compliance.

Added

Cancelled Transactions

Added

In February 2026, the Company entered into a contract to acquire a parcel of land in Osceola County, Central Florida, which was cancelled by the parties on May 15, 2026 upon mutual agreement.

Added

In March 2026, the Company entered into a non-binding letter of intent to acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding equity interests of Consensus Core Technologies, Inc. (“Consensus”), along with certain of its affiliates and subsidiaries. In August 2026 the Company decided to discontinue pursuing the transaction with Consensus.

Reworded

Series E Preferred Stock FinancingFinancings

Added

On July 9, 2026, the Company filed respective Certificate of Designation of Rights and Preferences of the Series E Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“Series E Preferred Stock”), with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada.

Reworded

On July 10, 2026, the Company and the Investor entered into a securities purchase agreement pursuant to which the Company issued the Investor 250 shares of the Company’s Series E Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“Series E Preferred Stock”), for a purchase price of $1,000 per share. On July 9, 2026, the Company filed respective Certificate of Designation of Rights and Preferences of the Series E Preferred Stock with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada.

Added

On July 31, 2026, the Company and the Investor entered into a securities purchase agreement pursuant to which the Company issued the Investor 150 shares of the Series E Preferred Stock, for a purchase price of $1,000 per share.

Added

On August 18, 2026, the Company and the Investor entered into a securities purchase agreement pursuant to which the Company issued the Investor 210 shares of the Series E Preferred Stock, for a purchase price of $1,000 per share.

Reworded

Our financial results are primarily driven by the total number of sales agents in our Company, the number of sales agents closing residential real estate transactions, the number of sales agents utilizing our coaching services, the number of agents who work with our franchisees, and the number of properties under management. We increased ourOur agent count bydecreased 7.66.5 %, from 2,7693,001 at MarchJune 31,30, 2025 to 2,9792,807 at MarchJune 31,30, 2026.

Reworded

The majority of our revenue is derived from fees and dues based on the number of agents working under the La Rosa Realty brand. Due to the low fixed cost structure of both our Company and franchise models, the addition of new sales agents generally requires little incremental investment in capital or infrastructure. Accordingly, the number of commission producing sales agents in our Company and our franchisees is the most important factor affecting our results of operations and the addition of new agents can favorably impact our revenue and our earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”). Historically, the number of agents in the residential real estate industry has been highly correlated with overall home sale transaction activity. We believe that the number of agents and those that produce commissions in our network is the primary statistic that drives our revenue. Another major factor is the cyclicality of the real estate industry that has peaks and valleys depending on macroeconomic conditions that we cannot control. And finally, our revenues fluctuate based on the changes in the aggregate fee revenue per sales agent as a significant portion of our revenue is tied to various fees that are ultimately tied to the number of agents, including annual dues, continuing franchise fees, and certain transaction or service-based fees. Our revenue per agent also increases in other ways including when transaction sides and transaction sizes increase since a portion of our revenue comes from fees tied to the number and size of real estate transactions closed by our agents. While the Company was not named as a defendant in any of the recent class action lawsuits alleging antitrust violations, it is possible that it could be a litigant at some point in the future. Several of these lawsuits have been settled (see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 filed with the SEC on June 4, 2026) “Risk Factors – Adverse outcomes in litigation and regulatory actions against the NAR, other real estate brokerage companies and agents in our industry could adversely impact our financial results). These settlements will result in changes in the way real estate brokers are compensated for their services. Most notably, home sellers will no longer be required to pay buyer agent commissions which will result in lower buyer agent compensation. We cannot predict the full breadth of the outcome of these lawsuits but believe that they will result in a significant adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations for the foreseeable future.

Reworded

The benchmark 30-year fixed conforming mortgage rate rose to a peak of about 8% during the second half of 2023, according to Freddie Mac data. That interest rate then retreated to between 6.08% and 7.22% during 2024 and between 6.15% to 7.04% during 2025. Consequently, housing demand remained soft, prices are rising, consumer sentiment has weakened, and home sales are declining. The U.S. Federal Reserve continues to take action intended to address inflation. The Federal Reserve Board maintained the federal funds rate at 533 basis points from August of 2023 through mid-September 2024, when it was reduced to 483 basis points. In MayJune 2026, the federal funds rate was 363 basis points. The fluctuations impact interest rates, which significantly contribute to mortgage rate adjustments. In May 2026, the existing home sales market rose 3.2% compared to both April 2026 and May 2025, reaching a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 4.17 million units, according to the NAR. This increase had a positive impact on consumer demand for our services, as consumers weighed the financial implications of selling or purchasing a home. Continuing improved housing market conditions would positively affect our operating performance and results of operations.

Added

In June 2026, the existing home sales market declined 2.4% from May and increased 2.8% from the prior year reaching a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 4.09 million units, and a record median price of $440,600, according to the NAR. The fluctuations in monthly home sales activity are driven by mild fluctuations in mortgage rates. This indicates that home buyers are sensitive to affordability conditions. Job gains will continue to provide support for the housing market. The $440.6 thousand median home price is an all-time high. Affordability is better than a year ago because wage growth is outpacing home price growth, However, progress on long-term housing affordability could be hampered if inventory growth continues to stall. Without consistent gains in inventory, home prices can accelerate. It is critical to introduce more supply to the market to widen the opportunity for homeownership.

Reworded

The recently adopted SEC cybersecurity disclosure rules for public companies require disclosure regarding cybersecurity risk management (including the corporate board’s role in overseeing cybersecurity risks, management’s role and expertise in assessing and managing cybersecurity risks, and processes for assessing, identifying and managing cybersecurity risks) in annual reports. These new cybersecurity disclosure rules also require the disclosure of material cybersecurity incidents in a Form 8-K, generally within four days of determining an incident is material. We have included respective disclosures in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 filed with the Commission on June 4 ,4, 2026.

Added

Three Months Ending June 30

Reworded

Residential real estate services sales revenue decreased by approximately $1.2$5.1 million, or 9%,26%, in the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 as compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The decrease was driven primarily by the sale of its interest in LR Kissimmee.

Reworded

Franchising services revenue decreased by approximately $4$9.6 thousand, or 9%,31%, in the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 as compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The decrease is attributable tothe reductionending inof franchisingcertain activities.franchise agreements.

Reworded

Coaching services revenue decreased by approximately $73$122.4 thousand, or 77%,100%, in the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 as compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, primarily due to a strategic shift from Coaching services to aid in onboarding of new Agents.

Reworded

Property management revenue increaseddecreased by approximately $3$6.8 thousand, or 3%,7%, in the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 as compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, overallas thisa isresult consistentof witha decrease in the priornumber yearof revenues.properties under management.

Reworded

Real estate brokerage services (commercial) revenue increased by approximately $216$17.3 thousand, or 379%,9%, in the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 as compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, as a result of new leadership in the department and the condensing lead time it generally takes to generate a commercial real estate transaction.

Reworded

Title settlement and insurance revenue increaseddecreased by approximately $22$4.9 thousand, or 28%,6%, in the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 as compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025, primarily due to company advertisingloss of thiskey servicemanagement toduring itsthe agents.second quarter of 2026.

Added

Six Months Ending June 30

Added

Residential real estate services sales revenue decreased by approximately $6.3 million, or 18%, in the six months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease was driven primarily by the sale of its interest in LR Kissimmee.

Added

Franchising services revenue decreased by approximately $13.3 thousand, or 19%, in the six months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease is attributable to reduction in franchising activities.

Added

Coaching services revenue decreased by approximately $195.0 thousand, or 90%, in the six months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to a strategic shift from Coaching services to aid in onboarding of new Agents.

Added

Property management revenue decreased by approximately $4.1 thousand, or 2%, in the six months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025, as a result of less properties under management.

Showing the first 60 of 95 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

LRHC insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 0 filings. Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

No Form 4 stock transactions in this period.

Well-known investors holding LRHC (13F)

InvestorQuarterSharesReported value% of their 13FChange vs prior quarter
Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) COM NEW2026-06-3010,832$12.6K0.0%New position

13F reports are filed up to 45 days after quarter end and show long U.S. equity positions only; options positions are omitted here.

Coming soon: email alerts when LRHC files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.