Companies › LTBR

LTBR 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading

LIGHTBRIDGE Corp · Nasdaq · Industrial Inorganic Chemicals · CIK 1084554 · All filings on SEC.gov

Everything below is quoted or computed from LIGHTBRIDGE Corp's public SEC filings. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Automated comparisons can contain errors; confirm with the original filing.

At a glance

18 / 12risk-factor paragraphs added / removed in latest 10-K
4new risk-factor headings
0Form 4 filings reporting open-market purchases (last 180 days)
6Form 4 filings reporting open-market sales (last 180 days)

Jump to: Annual report (10-K) · Quarterly report (10-Q) · Insider transactions · 13F holders

What changed in the latest 10-K

Comparing 10-K filed 2026-02-26 (period ending 2025-12-31) with 10-K filed 2025-03-03 (period ending 2024-12-31).

Risk Factors (10-K Item 1A)

18new paragraphs
12removed paragraphs
22reworded paragraphs
9,678 → 9,961words in section

New heading “Declining Political Support or Reductions in Government Funding for Nuclear Energy Could Materially Adversely Affect Our Business.”

New heading “Dependence on the Future Availability of Cost-Competitive Metallic HALEU and Commercial-Scale Fuel Fabrication Infrastructure”

New heading “We have limited experience deploying and operating a dedicated nuclear fuel fabrication facility, and our lack of operational experience with a LEFF could materially and adversely affect our business.”

New heading “AI and generative AI applications present risks and challenges that can impact our business.”

Removed heading “We are dependent upon significant U.S. government funding and/or in-kind contributions and political support for nuclear power in order to complete our fuel development efforts and commercialize our nuclear fuel technology.”

Removed heading “Applicable Russian intellectual property law may not protect some of our intellectual property, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.”

Removed heading “The Company currently has a limited number of authorized common shares available for future issuance.”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: cybersecurity incident, breach, generative ai, ai
“While we integrate AI and generative AI (collectively, AI) into our day-to-day operations and research and development efforts to enhance efficiency and effectiveness, rapid advancements in AI technologies pose a risk, including that the algorithms may be flawed, misused or otherwise function in an unexpected manner; data sets may be insufficient, of poor quality, or contain biased information; and inappropriate or controversial data practices by data scientists, engineers, and end-users could impair results. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: generative ai, ai
“AI and generative AI applications present risks and challenges that can impact our business.”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: sanction, russia, ukraine
“Intellectual property rights have been evolving in Russia, and are trending towards international norms, but are still developing. We have worked closely with employees in Russia and other Russian contractors and entities to develop some of our material intellectual property. Some of our earlier intellectual property rights originate from our patent filings in Russia. Our worldwide rights in some of this intellectual property, therefore, may be affected by Russian intellectual property laws, including laws adopted in response to international sanctions against Russia or otherwise. …”
see in full comparison
New text topics: sanction, russia, ukraine
“We have in the past worked closely with employees in Russia and other Russian contractors and entities to develop some of our material intellectual property. Some of our earlier intellectual property rights originate from our patent filings in Russia. Our worldwide rights in some of this intellectual property, therefore, may be affected by Russian intellectual property laws, including laws adopted in response to international sanctions against Russia or otherwise. …”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: russia
“Applicable Russian intellectual property law may not protect some of our intellectual property, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.”
see in full comparison
New text topics: penalt, regulation
“In addition, operating a nuclear fuel fabrication facility requires adherence to rigorous nuclear quality assurance standards, environmental, health, and safety regulations, security requirements, and nuclear material accountability protocols. Any failure to establish or maintain appropriate operational controls could result in regulatory enforcement actions, license modifications, civil penalties, operational shutdowns, reputational harm, or increased oversight. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (52)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

Our business faces significant risks. You should carefully consider all the information set forth in this annual report and in our other filings with the SEC, including the following risk factors which we face, and which are faced by our industry. Our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected by any of these risks. In that event, the trading price of our common stock would likely decline, and you might lose all or part of your investment. This reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our results could materially differ from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, as a result of certain factors including the risks described below and elsewhere in this reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K and our other SEC filings. See also “Forward-Looking Statements” above.

Reworded

Risks Related to Our Business and to the Commercialization of Lightbridge Fuel™

Added

We will need to raise significant additional capital in the future to continue our operations and fund our research and development activities required to advance the development and commercialization of our nuclear fuel. Depending on a variety of factors, we may be unable to raise sufficient capital on acceptable terms, or at all, which could materially harm our business or result in significant dilution to our stockholders beyond what we currently expect.

Reworded

As of December 31, 2024,2025, we had approximately $40.0$201.9 million in cash and cash equivalents.equivalents and an accumulated deficit of approximately $183.8 million. We have experiencedincurred substantial and recurring losses from operations,operations whichand hasexpect created an accumulated deficit of $164.2 million as of December 31, 2024. We willto continue to incur significant losses becausefor the foreseeable future as we areremain in the early development stagestages of commercializingdeveloping our nuclear fuel.

Added

Although we raised approximately $182.0 million of gross proceeds during 2025 through our ATM equity programs, our existing capital resources will be insufficient to fund our operations, research and development activities, and commercialization efforts to become cash-flow positive. Our future capital requirements may be higher than currently anticipated due to factors such as increased research and development costs, unanticipated technical challenges, regulatory requirements, or delays in achieving development milestones.

Added

We expect to seek additional funding through a combination of public or private equity offerings, strategic alliances, government grants, debt financings, or other financing arrangements. However, such financing may not be available to us when needed, on acceptable terms, or at all. Our ability to raise additional capital may depend on numerous factors, including market conditions, investor perception of our progress, regulatory developments, and broader economic conditions.

Added

If we are unable to obtain sufficient additional capital when required, we may be forced to delay, reduce, or cease our operations, including substantially reducing or suspending our research and development activities, which would materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. In such circumstances, investors may lose all or a substantial portion of their investment in our common stock.

Removed

We will need to raise significant additional capital (up to several hundred million dollars in total over the next 10-15 years) in order to continue our R&D activities and fund our operations through the commercialization of our nuclear fuel. R&D costs may exceed our budget estimates, leading to financial strain and suspending our R&D activities. Our current plan is to maximize external funding from third-party sources, including potentially the DOE, to support the remaining development, testing and demonstration activities relating to our metallic nuclear fuel technology.

Removed

When we elect to raise additional funds or additional funds are required, we may raise such funds from time to time through public or private equity offerings, debt financings or other financing alternatives. Additional equity or debt financing, or other alternative sources of capital may not be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all. If we are unable to meet our future financial obligations, we could be forced to delay, reduce, or cease our operations, including substantially decrease or suspend our R&D activities, or otherwise impede our ongoing business efforts, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition, and long-term prospects, and, investors may lose their entire investment in the Company. In addition, if we are unable to demonstrate meaningful progress to further the development of our fuel products, it may be difficult for us to raise additional capital on terms acceptable to us or at all.

Reworded

When we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, including using our at-the-market (ATM) facility, our stockholders will in some circumstances experience dilution.dilution, Salesand sales of substantial amounts of our common stock may causecontribute to a decline in the trading price of our common stock to decline in the future.stock. New investors may have rights superior to existing securityholders. Debt financing, if available, would result in substantial fixed payment obligations and may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures, or declaring dividends. Any debt financing or additional equity that we raise may contain terms, such as liquidation and other preferences, which are not favorable to us or our stockholders. If we are unable to raise additional capital in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable to us, we may not be able to fully develop our nuclear fuel designs, our future operations will be limited, and our ability to generate revenues and achieve or sustain future profitability will be substantially harmed. In particular, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of or terminate one or more of our research projects, sell rights to our nuclear fuel technology or license the rights to such technologies on terms that are less favorable to us than might otherwise be available.

Removed

We are dependent upon significant U.S. government funding and/or in-kind contributions and political support for nuclear power in order to complete our fuel development efforts and commercialize our nuclear fuel technology.

Removed

Our projected fuel development timeline is dependent upon receiving significant funding and/or in-kind contributions from the U.S. government to not only support our ongoing R&D efforts, but to also provide confidence to our investors and reduce the need to raise funds through the issuance of additional dilutive equity securities. Government funding of R&D is subject to the political process, which is inherently unpredictable and highly competitive. The funding of government programs is dependent on budgetary limitations, congressional appropriations, and administrative allotment of funds, all of which are uncertain and may be affected by changes in U.S. government policies resulting from various political developments. If political support for the prioritization of the development of nuclear energy decreases, including due to policy changes by current or future administrations and changing congressional funding priorities, it may affect our ability to secure government funding which would adversely affect our business, fuel development timeline, financial condition, and results of operations.

Reworded

The amount of time and funding needed to bring our nuclear fuel to market and generate revenue may greatly exceed our projections.

Reworded

The development of our nuclear fuel will take a significant amount of time and funding, and any shortfall in R&D funding levels or a delay in achieving fuel development milestones, or uncertainty in regulatory licensing timelines could result in significant delays and cost overruns. We cannot at this stage accurately predict the amount of funding or the time required to successfully develop, manufacture and sell our nuclear fuel in the future. However, our bestcurrent estimate at this time is that our metallic fuel development program is expected to take 15-20approximately 10-15 years and cost several hundred million U.S. dollars before we can secure our initial commercial order for a batch reload. The actual cost and time required to commercialize our fuel technology may vary significantly depending on, among other things, the results of our research and product development efforts; the cost of developing or licensing our nuclear fuel; changes in the focus and direction of our research and product development programs; access to test reactor loops and/or other test facilities; competitive and technological advances; the cost of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing claims with respect to patents; the regulatory approval process; fuel manufacturing process; availability of metallic high assay low enriched uranium, and marketing and other costs associated with commercialization of these technologies. Because of this uncertainty, even if financing is available to us, we may need significantly more capital than anticipated, which may not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all, and the expected revenues and other expected benefits from our nuclear fuel technology may be delayed or never realized.

Added

Declining Political Support or Reductions in Government Funding for Nuclear Energy Could Materially Adversely Affect Our Business.

Added

Our business strategy depends on sustained political support for nuclear energy and advanced reactor technologies. While recent policy actions have been favorable, political priorities can shift rapidly with changes in administration, congressional leadership, or broader public sentiment. A reduction in bipartisan support for nuclear innovation could materially affect the regulatory environment, slow or complicate licensing pathways, limit access to government programs, or reduce the willingness of federal agencies to engage in long‑term partnerships. Although we do not rely exclusively on U.S. government funding, any such changes could materially impact our business. Many of the programs that support the development, testing, and commercialization of advanced nuclear technologies are subject to annual appropriations and policy direction from elected officials. Even if such programs remain authorized, diminished political backing could result in reduced funding levels, delays in grant or contract awards, or changes in program priorities that no longer align with our technology. Any of these outcomes could adversely impact our development timelines, increase our capital requirements, or limit our ability to advance our fuel technology.

Added

In order for our metallic fuel to succeed, we will need to be able to produce our nuclear fuel at a price that is economically viable. We have received estimates that metallization of our nuclear fuel could be achieved at a commercial scale for approximately $5,000 to $10,000 per kilogram of heavy metal using known metallization/de-conversion technologies. To bring the cost of metallization/de-conversion further down, we estimate that it would require a new government-funded research and development program that could take 15-20 years or longer and cost several billion dollars. In October 2024, DOE launched a HALEU program whereby DOE is funding production of 250 metric tons of HALEU in both oxide and metallic forms in the United States over the next 10 years to facilitate establishment of a U.S. supply chain for HALEU. There can be no assurance that we will be able to produce our nuclear fuel at a price that is economically feasible or that future research efforts will lower the cost of production. If we are unable to produce our nuclear fuel at a price that is economically viable, the market for our nuclear fuel may never develop and our current business model will fail.

Added

Dependence on the Future Availability of Cost-Competitive Metallic HALEU and Commercial-Scale Fuel Fabrication Infrastructure

Added

A key factor affecting the long-term commercial viability of our metallic nuclear fuel is the ability to produce fuel at a cost that is economically competitive for reactor operators. Although our current fuel development activities are not dependent on commercial availability of HALEU or commercial metallization/de-conversion capabilities, the future commercialization of Lightbridge Fuel™ will ultimately require a reliable supply of HALEU in metallic form and the development of commercial-scale metallization and fabrication infrastructure. At present, no commercial supplier in the United States provides HALEU in metallic form at the enrichment levels and quantities needed for commercial deployment of our nuclear fuel, and existing metallization/de-conversion processes remain limited to government-supported research settings. While these constraints are not expected to impact our near-term R&D activities or our ability to execute the current phases of our fuel development program, they represent known long-term industry uncertainties. If future metallization/de-conversion costs prove to be higher than expected, or if government-supported technology development does not lead to commercially viable cost levels, our fuel may not achieve the economic competitiveness necessary for broad market adoption. These supply chain limitations may influence the timing, production costs, and capital requirements associated with eventual commercialization of Lightbridge Fuel™, including the need for additional government programs, strategic partnerships, or capital investment to establish the supporting fuel cycle infrastructure.

Added

We will evaluate the potential costs associated with future industrial-scale fabrication of our fuel and the impact of those costs on our commercialization strategy, partnerships, and long-term capital requirements. However, our evaluation of such costs is subject to significant uncertainty because no commercial-scale metallization/de-conversion capability exists today in the United States for the type of fuel we intend to produce.

Added

We have limited experience deploying and operating a dedicated nuclear fuel fabrication facility, and our lack of operational experience with a LEFF could materially and adversely affect our business.

Added

We have not previously constructed, licensed, or operated a pilot-scale and/or commercial-scale nuclear fuel fabrication facility. The proposed LEFF would represent a new and highly specialized manufacturing capability involving complex metallurgical processes, nuclear material handling, criticality safety controls, quality assurance systems, and compliance with extensive regulatory requirements. Our management team has limited direct experience designing, constructing, commissioning, and operating a dedicated nuclear fuel fabrication facility of the type contemplated for the LEFF.

Added

The deployment of the LEFF would require significant capital investment, specialized technical expertise, qualified personnel, supply chain coordination, regulatory approvals from the NRC, various local permits, and access to sufficient quantities of HALEU. The process of developing operational capabilities at the LEFF could involve substantial engineering challenges, process development risks, construction delays, cost overruns, equipment procurement challenges, equipment performance issues, and regulatory licensing uncertainties. If we are unable to effectively manage these complexities, we may experience significant delays, increased capital expenditures, safety or compliance issues, or an inability to achieve targeted production volumes or quality standards.

Added

In addition, operating a nuclear fuel fabrication facility requires adherence to rigorous nuclear quality assurance standards, environmental, health, and safety regulations, security requirements, and nuclear material accountability protocols. Any failure to establish or maintain appropriate operational controls could result in regulatory enforcement actions, license modifications, civil penalties, operational shutdowns, reputational harm, or increased oversight. Recruiting and retaining personnel with the requisite nuclear fabrication, metallurgical, and regulatory compliance expertise may also prove difficult or costly.

Added

If we are unable to successfully design, license, construct, commission, and operate the LEFF on a timely and cost-effective basis, our ability to manufacture lead test rods and/or lead test assemblies, scale production to commercial quantities, and generate future revenues from fuel sales could be materially and adversely affected. Any such difficulties could significantly delay our commercialization timeline, require additional capital raising, dilute existing stockholders, or adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Reworded

Our fuel designs are still in the research and development stage and further research, development, and demonstration will be required in test facilities. We had intended to conduct further testing of our fuel designs at the Halden research reactor located in Halden, Norway. However, the Halden research reactor, which became operational in 1958, was shut down in June 2018 and will not reopen. The Company has identified alternative options to generate the irradiation data we need to support regulatory licensing of our LTA operation in a commercial reactor,facilities, such as the ATR at INL, but pursuing such alternatives to the Halden research reactor may significantly delay further testing of our fuel designs.INL. We may not be able to contractually secure another reactor in which to test our fuel designs. As a result, commercialization of our nuclear fuel technology may be significantly delayed, perhaps indefinitely, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Removed

In order for our metallic fuel to succeed, we will need to be able to produce our nuclear fuel at a price that is economically viable. We have received estimates that production of our nuclear fuel could be achieved at a commercial scale for approximately $5,000 to $10,000 per kilogram using known metallization/de-conversion technologies. To bring the cost of metallization/de-conversion further down, we estimate that it would require a new government-funded research and development program that could take 15-20 years or longer and cost several billion dollars. In October 2024, DOE launched a HALEU program whereby DOE is funding production of 250 metric tons of HALEU in both oxide and metallic forms in the United States over the next 10 years to facilitate establishment of a U.S. supply chain for HALEU. There can be no assurance that we will be able to produce our nuclear fuel at a price that is economically feasible or that future research efforts will lower the cost of production. If we are unable to produce our nuclear fuel at a price that is economically viable, the market for our nuclear fuel may never develop and our current business model will fail.

Reworded

Successful execution of our business model is dependent upon public support for nuclear power in the United States and other countries. Nuclear power faces strong opposition from certain competitive energy sources, individuals, and organizations. The accident that occurred at the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan beginning on March 11, 2011 increased public opposition to nuclear power in some countries, resulting in a slowdown in or, in some cases, a complete halt to new construction of nuclear power plants, early shut down of existing power plants, or dampening of the favorable regulatory climate needed to introduce new nuclear technologies. As a result of the Fukushima accident, some countries that were considering launching new domestic nuclear power programs have delayed or cancelled preparatory activities they were planning to undertake as part of such programs. Furthermore, nuclear fuel fabrication and the use of new nuclear fuels in reactors must be licensed by the NRC and equivalent governmental authorities around the world. In many countries, the licensing process includes public hearings inand allows for an extensive administrative process, which opponentsmay of the use of nuclear power might be able to causedelay the issuance of requirednecessary licenses to be delayed or denied.licenses. Upon commercialization, a reduction or elimination of customer contracts or future customer contracts resulting from lower public support, less raw materials, lower demand, increased regulation, and increased costs could adversely affect our business model and future prospects.

Reworded

In addition, the U.S. federal and state government andpolicies have created deployment uncertainty for nuclear power. While many statesprior have adopted a variety of government subsidies and utilityfederal incentives toprioritizing allow renewable energy sources, such as biofuels, wind,wind and solar energy,energy deployment have largely expired, many state incentive programs remain in place. U.S. federal government policy has shifted to compete with conventional sources of energy that have historically been less expensive, such asencourage fossil fuels and nuclear power. WeHowever, maythe face additional indirect competition from providers of renewable energy sources, particularly in wind and solar energy, if government subsidies and utility incentivestimelines for thosedeployment, sourcesincluding ofthe energytime to license projects, remain oran increaseobstacle orfor ifnuclear suchpower. sources of energy are mandated. Additionally, the availability of subsidies and other incentives from utilities or government agencies to install alternative renewable energy sourcesThis may negatively impact our project licensing and our potential customers’ desire to purchase our products and services, or may be utilized by our existing or new competitors to develop a competing business model or products or services that may be potentially more attractive to customers than ours, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

Reworded

Other companies may develop new nuclear fuel designs for use in the same types of reactors that we target. These nuclear fuel designs include, but are not limited to, the ATFs currently being developed and tested by several U.S. and international nuclear fuel suppliers (some with the support of the DOE). Such competitor ATF designs could undermine our nuclear fuel’s economic value proposition if they extend the operating cycle length beyond 18 months. Recently, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approved an increase in the burnup limit for a different manufacturer’s ATFs design, which could eventually allow that design to achieve a cycle length beyond 18 months.

Reworded

Our nuclear fuel designs may infringe, or be claimed to infringe, patents or patent applications under which we do not hold licenses or other rights. Third-parties may own or control these patents and patent applications in the United States and elsewhere. Third-parties could bring claims against us that would cause us to incur substantial expenses and, if successfully asserted against us, could cause us to pay substantial damages. If a patent infringement suit were brought against us, we could be forced to stop or delay commercialization of our fuel design or a component thereof that is the subject of the suit. As a result of patent infringement claims, or in order to avoid potential claims, we may choose or be required to seek a license from the third-party and be required to pay license fees, royalties, or both. These licenses may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Even if we were able to obtain a license, the rights may be nonexclusive, which could result in our competitors gaining access to the same intellectual property. Ultimately, we could be forced to cease some aspectaspects of our business operations if, as a result of actual or threatened patent infringement claims, we are unable to enter into licenses on acceptable terms. This could significantly and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition to infringement claims against us, we may become a party to other types of patent litigation and other proceedings, including interference proceedings declared by the United States Patent and Trademark Office regarding intellectual property rights with respect to our nuclear fuel designs. The cost to us of any patent litigation or other proceeding, even if resolved in our favor, could be substantial. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because of their greater financial resources. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete in the marketplace. Patent litigation and other proceedings may also absorb significant management time.

Reworded

We retain highly confidential information in our systems and databasesthose onof third-party network providers. Although we maintain security features in our systems designed to protect proprietary information and prevent data loss and other cybersecurity incidents,,incidents, such measures cannot provide absolute security and our operations may be susceptible to incidents affectingincluding ourwithout third-party networks, includinglimitation from circumvention of security systems, denial of service attacks orattacks, ransomware, hacking, computer viruses or malware, technical malfunction, employee error or noncompliance, malfeasance, physical breaches, or system disruptions. Evolving technologies, such as the use of artificial intelligence, also pose newevolving threats to cybersecurity. We outsource certain functions, including IT functions, and these relationships allow forinvolve the storage and processing of our information, as well as customer, counterparty, and employee information. While we engage in actions to reduce our exposure resulting from outsourcing, ongoingwe threatsremain maysusceptible resultto in unauthorized access, loss, exposure or destruction of data, or otherthird-party cybersecurity incidents, with increased costs and other consequences, including those described below. The third-parties with which we outsource certain of our IT functions utilize a variety of systems and cybersecurity capabilities, and such third-parties may not be successful in preventing a cybersecurity incident that exploits a weakness in their cybersecurity systems.incidents. In some cases, we may not be aware of cybersecurity incidents immediately as we rely on such third-parties to inform us of a cybersecurity incident that could affect our information contained in their systems.

Reworded

Cybersecurity incidents may jeopardize the security, trade secrets, other confidential data, or otherfurther information storedprocessed in and transmitted throughby our systems or the systems of third parties. In addition, cybersecurity incidents may cause extended disruptions to operations and thus could impact our ability to develop products and conduct research and development. The techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable, or degrade service, or sabotage systems, change frequently, may bego difficult to detectundetected for aextended long time,periods, and often are not recognized until after data has been taken or significant systems are compromised. Certain efforts may be nation-state sponsored and supported by significant financial and technological resources and therefore may be even more difficult to detect. We, or the third-parties with whom we contract, may not anticipate these evolving techniques or implement adequate preventive measures. We currently expend and may be required to further expend significant additional capital and other resources to protect against or respond to cybersecurity incidents. Our insurance coverage may be inadequate to compensate us for any related losses we incur and, in some cases, our insurance coverage may not cover the cybersecurity incident at all.

Reworded

These issues are likely to become more difficult as we expand our operations. Any breachcybersecurity of our security measures,incident or even a perceived breachcybersecurity of our security measures,incident could cause us to: lose potential customers, investors, government contracts and governmental approvals; suffer material harm to our business, financial condition, operating results, and reputation; or be subject to regulatory actions, litigation, sanctions, or other statutory penalties.

Added

AI and generative AI applications present risks and challenges that can impact our business.

Added

While we integrate AI and generative AI (collectively, AI) into our day-to-day operations and research and development efforts to enhance efficiency and effectiveness, rapid advancements in AI technologies pose a risk, including that the algorithms may be flawed, misused or otherwise function in an unexpected manner; data sets may be insufficient, of poor quality, or contain biased information; and inappropriate or controversial data practices by data scientists, engineers, and end-users could impair results. Issues in the use of AI, combined with an uncertain regulatory environment, may result in reputational harm, liability, or other adverse consequences to our business operations to the extent we rely on the use of AI. In addition to our own use of AI, our vendors may integrate AI into their products that we use without adequate notice to us. Vendors may not be able to comply with existing or rapidly evolving regulatory or industry standards for privacy and data protection, potentially exposing us to cybersecurity risk. If we, our vendors or third-party partners experience an actual or perceived breach or privacy or cybersecurity incident because of our, a vendor, or a third-party partner’s use of AI, it could lead to the loss of valuable intellectual property and confidential information. Such cybersecurity incidents could also harm our reputation and public perception of our security measures. Moreover, malicious actors worldwide increasingly employ sophisticated AI techniques to illegally obtain and misuse personal information, confidential data, and intellectual property. Any of these scenarios could result in reputational damage, loss of valuable assets, and adverse impacts on our business.

Reworded

Our failure to refine or advance our fuel technologies could cause our nuclear fuel to become uncompetitive or obsolete, which could prevent us from achieving market share and sales. We may need to invest significant financial resources in research and product development to keep pace with technological advances in the industry and to compete in the future;future, and we may be unable to secure such financing. A variety of competing alternative technologies may be in development by other companies that could result in lower manufacturing costs and/or higher fuel performance than those expected for our fuel products. Our development efforts may be rendered obsolete by the technological advances of others, and other technologies may prove more advantageous for commercialization.

Added

We have in the past worked closely with employees in Russia and other Russian contractors and entities to develop some of our material intellectual property. Some of our earlier intellectual property rights originate from our patent filings in Russia. Our worldwide rights in some of this intellectual property, therefore, may be affected by Russian intellectual property laws, including laws adopted in response to international sanctions against Russia or otherwise. In particular, in response to the sanctions imposed by OFAC as a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Russian government issued a decree in March 2022 stating that patent holders associated with foreign states that commit “unfriendly actions against Russian legal entities and individuals” will be entitled to no renumeration from the unsanctioned use of such patent holders’ intellectual property. If the application of Russian laws to some of our intellectual property rights proves inadequate, or if the rights of foreign holders of intellectual property in Russia adversely change as a result of hostilities between Russia and other countries or otherwise, we may not be able to fully avail ourselves of all of our intellectual property, and our business model may be impeded.

Removed

Applicable Russian intellectual property law may not protect some of our intellectual property, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Removed

Intellectual property rights have been evolving in Russia, and are trending towards international norms, but are still developing. We have worked closely with employees in Russia and other Russian contractors and entities to develop some of our material intellectual property. Some of our earlier intellectual property rights originate from our patent filings in Russia. Our worldwide rights in some of this intellectual property, therefore, may be affected by Russian intellectual property laws, including laws adopted in response to international sanctions against Russia or otherwise. In particular, in response to the sanctions imposed by OFAC as a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Russian government issued a decree in March 2022 stating that patent holders associated with foreign states that commit “unfriendly actions against Russian legal entities and individuals” will be entitled to no renumeration from the unsanctioned use of such patent holders’ intellectual property. If the application of Russian laws to some of our intellectual property rights proves inadequate, or if the rights of foreign holders of intellectual property in Russia adversely change as a result of hostilities between Russia and other countries or otherwise, we may not be able to fully avail ourselves of all of our intellectual property, and our business model may be impeded.

Removed

The laws of certain foreign jurisdictions do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States, and many companies have encountered significant challenges in protecting and defending such rights in such foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of certain countries, particularly developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents and other intellectual property protection, which could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents. Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial cost and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business.

Reworded

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal controls are designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). However, internal controls have inherent limitations and may not prevent or detect misstatements, errors, or fraud.

Reworded

AsManagement reportedhas onconcluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2025. See Item 9A. Controls and Procedures in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for theadditional yearinformation. ended December 31, 2023,However, we previously identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting and may identify additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, which may result in material misstatementsmisstatement of our financial statements or cause us to fail to meet our periodic reporting obligations. Specifically, management identified a material weakness related to the design of our controls over logical access and segregation of duties, at the application control level, in certain information technology environments. The Company’s management, under the oversight of the Audit Committee, took measures and remediated these deficiencies.

Removed

Management, including our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and our Chief Financial Officer (CFO), assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024 and concluded that we remediated the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting from the prior year.

Removed

See Item 9A. Controls and Procedures in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information about the material weakness.

Reworded

The issuance of additional stock in connection with financings, acquisitions, investments, our stock incentive plans or otherwise will in some circumstances dilute all otherour stockholders.

Reworded

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes the Company to issue up to 25,000,000100,000,000 shares of common stock and up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock with such rights and preferences as may be determined by our board of directors. Subject to compliance with applicable rules and regulations, we may seek to expand the number of authorized common shares, and issue shares of common stock or securities convertible into our common stock from time to time in connection with a financing, acquisition, investment, our stock incentive plans or otherwise. The sale and issuance of shares of common stock under our ATM facility has resulted in dilution to our existing stockholders. Any suchadditional issuanceissuances could result in substantial additional dilution to our existing stockholders and cause the trading price of our common stock to decline.

Removed

The Company currently has a limited number of authorized common shares available for future issuance.

Removed

As of February 27, 2025, we had 3.1 million authorized but unissued common stock shares, excluding an additional 1.1 million shares reserved under the 2020 omnibus incentive equity plan. The board of directors has approved an increase in the Company’s authorized common stock from 25,000,000 shares to 100,000,000 shares and this issue will be voted on by the Company’s stockholders at the next stockholders annual meeting, which is expected to occur in June 2025. If the increase in the authorized number of shares is not approved by the Company’s stockholders, the Company may not have the ability to raise capital funds that may be necessary to further develop its core business, to finance working capital requirements, to have shares available for use in connection with its stock option plans, and to pursue other corporate purposes that may be identified by the board of directors.

Reworded

The market price of our common stock has fluctuated and may continue to fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control, including:

Reworded

The stock market may experience extreme volatility that is often unrelated to the performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may cause our stock price to fall regardless of the Company’s performance.performance or related factors that are specific to the Company.

Reworded

Our ability to fully utilize our existing net operating losses (NOLs) generated after the tax year 2017 will be limited and the use of our NOLs generated prior to the 2018 tax year are severely limited, due to ownership changes in prior years as defined under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. An “ownership change” is generally defined as a greater than 50% change in equity ownership by value over a rolling three-year period. Future NOLs generated will be limited if (i) we undergo an “ownership change” as described under Section 382, (ii) we do not reach profitability or are only marginally profitable, or (iii) there are changes in U.S. government laws and regulations. We did not perform a complete Section 382 study to determine the limitation on prior year NOLs, due to the long timeline for developing our nuclear fuel to commercialization to generate taxable income. Further, based on the results of our phase I Section 382 study in 2022, it’s likely our NOLs generated prior to the 2018 tax year will expire unused given the 20-year carry forwardcarryforward period for these NOLs. Future ownership changes, some of which may be beyond our control, as well as differences and fluctuations in the value of our equity securities may adversely affect our ability to utilize our current and future NOLs and could reduce our flexibility to raise capital in future equity financings or other transactions, or we may decide to pursue transactions even if they would result in an ownership change and impair our ability to use our NOLs. We also may decide to pursue transactions even if they would result in an ownership change and impair our ability to use our NOLs. In addition, any changes to tax rules and regulations or the interpretation of tax rules and regulations could negatively impact our ability to recognize any potential benefits from our NOLs or net unrealized built-in losses.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-K Item 7)

48new paragraphs
64removed paragraphs
20reworded paragraphs
6,194 → 4,714words in section

New heading “Commercialization Outlook and Key Drivers of Timing”

New heading “Known Long-Term Industry Constraints and Uncertainties”

New heading “Overview – Funding Requirements”

New heading “Long-Term Liquidity and Capital Requirements”

New heading “Sources of Liquidity”

New heading “ATM Equity Offering Program”

New heading “Liquidity Outlook and Risks”

New heading “Contractual and Other Obligations”

Removed heading “Future Steps Toward Our Fuel Development and Timeline For The Commercialization of Our Nuclear Fuel Assemblies”

Removed heading “Liquidity Outlook”

Removed heading “Operating Leases”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: liquidity
“Long-Term Liquidity and Capital Requirements”
see in full comparison
New text topics: liquidity
“Liquidity Outlook and Risks”
see in full comparison
New text topics: liquidity
“Sources of Liquidity”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: liquidity
“Liquidity Outlook”
see in full comparison
Removed text topics: default
“With historical approaches, the development and qualification of a nuclear fuel system can take 20-30 years as the approach has been driven largely by a cycle of physical testing and design changes based on the results of those physical tests. Computer modeling and simulation has increasingly been used in support of fuel qualification efforts, but the cyclical approach continues to be the default methodology.”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“Future Steps Toward Our Fuel Development and Timeline For The Commercialization of Our Nuclear Fuel Assemblies”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (132)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs, 4 paragraphs where only numbers/dates changed, and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, or MD&A, is intended to help the reader understand Lightbridge Corporation, our operations, and our present business environment. MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes thereto, which are contained in Part II. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this report.Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Removed

This MD&A consists of the following sections:

Removed

When used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the terms “Lightbridge”, the “Company”, “we”, “our”, and “us” refer to Lightbridge Corporation together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries Lightbridge International Holding LLC and Thorium Power Inc. Lightbridge’s principal executive offices are located at 11710 Plaza America Drive, Suite 2000, Reston, Virginia, 20190, USA.

Reworded

At Lightbridge, we are developing next generation nuclear fuel for water-cooled reactors that could significantly improve the economics and safety of existing and new nuclear power plants, large and small,plants and enhance proliferation resistance of spent nuclear fuel while supplying clean energy to the electric grid or to “behind the meter” customers for electric power, including data centers. We believe thatour themetallic world’sfuel energycould offer significant economic and climatesafety needsbenefits canover only be met iftraditional nuclear power’sfuel, shareprimarily because of the energy-generatingsuperior mixheat growstransfer substantiallyproperties inand the comingresulting decades.lower Weoperating temperature of our all-metal fuel. Data centers will need massive, constant power that we believe Lightbridge can benefit from a growing nuclear power industry,can provide. Advances in reactor technology, combined with growing corporate and thatgovernmental oursupport for clean energy, can position nuclear fuelpower canas helpa enablecornerstone thatof growthfuture energy strategies for data-intensive industries, which may be willing to happen.pay a premium for reliable, clean, and sustainable baseload electricity.

Added

We believe our metallic fuel can be used in different types of water-cooled commercial power reactors, such as PWRs, BWRs, VVERs, CANDUs, water-cooled SMRs, and water-cooled research reactors. We have obtained patent validation in key countries that we believe would have a commercial market for our fuel and will continue to seek patent validation in countries that either currently operate or are expected to build and operate a large number of nuclear power reactors compatible with our fuel technology.

Removed

We believe our metallic fuel will offer significant economic and safety benefits over traditional nuclear fuel, primarily because of the superior heat transfer properties and the resulting lower operating temperature of all-metal fuel.

Removed

Technology industry companies believe that nuclear energy can offer a strategic, sustainable, and reliable solution for powering data centers. Advances in reactor technology, combined with growing corporate and governmental support for clean energy, can position nuclear power as a cornerstone of future energy strategies for data-intensive industries. We believe that by integrating nuclear power, the data center sector can achieve operational efficiency, energy security, and sustainability. We believe uses of our fuel could include providing additional power via power uprates of existing reactors, which may be willing to pay a premium for reliable, clean, and sustainable baseload electricity. Oil and gas producing companies are investing in low-emission energy technologies to reduce fossil fuel emissions from oil and gas production. Advances in nuclear reactor and fuel technology can position nuclear power as a key energy source for this purpose.

Removed

Emerging nuclear technologies include small modular reactors (SMRs), which are now in the development and licensing phases. We expect that Lightbridge Fuel™ can provide water-cooled SMRs with the same benefits our technology brings to large reactors, with such benefits being even more meaningful to the economic case for deployment of SMRs, including potential load following capability when included on a virtually zero-carbon electric grid with renewable energy sources. We expect Lightbridge Fuel™ to enable power uprates in SMRs.

Removed

We have built a significant portfolio of patents, and we anticipate testing our nuclear fuel through third-party vendors and others, including the United States Department of Energy’s (DOE) national laboratories. Currently, we are performing the majority of our R&D activities within and in collaboration with the DOE’s national laboratories.

Added

Memorandum of Understanding with Oklo, Inc.

Added

In January 2025, we signed a MOU with Oklo to: (1) conduct a preliminary evaluation of feasibility of co-locating a Lightbridge Commercial-scale Fuel Fabrication Facility at Oklo’s proposed commercial fuel fabrication facility; (2) explore opportunities for collaboration on reprocessing and recycling of spent uranium zirconium fuel; and (3) explore any other areas of collaboration that may be of mutual interest. We believe there may be some potential synergies in co-locating our expandable fuel facility at Oklo’s proposed site. We also believe that recycling and reprocessing spent uranium-zirconium fuel may represent another area of potential synergies.

Added

Master Services Agreement with Amentum Technology Inc.

Added

In December 2025, the Company entered into a MSA with Amentum relating to the performance of activities by Amentum in support of the co-location feasibility study under the MOU with Oklo, as well as other activities as the Company and Amentum may agree from time to time. In January 2026, we entered into a statement of work under our MSA with Amentum pursuant to which we expect to incur approximately $0.4 million in costs during 2026 related to the Oklo co-location feasibility study.

Added

Memorandum of Understanding and Collaborative Agreement for Cladding Alloy Compositions In November 2025, Lightbridge entered into an MOU and a separate Collaboration Agreement with a U.S. manufacturer specializing in advanced specialty metals to support the research and development of cladding alloy compositions for potential use as cladding materials for Lightbridge Fuel™. Under the MOU, the parties agreed to pursue a phased technical evaluation program beginning with alloy development, melting, processing, and characterization activities (Phase 1). The Collaboration Agreement governs the conduct of Phase 1 research and provides a framework for developing future project plans. Lightbridge expects to incur approximately $0.3 million in Phase 1 costs in 2026, which will be expensed as incurred and included in research and development expenses.

Reworded

InAs Decembernoted 2022,under LightbridgePart I. Item 1. Business, we entered into agreements with Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC (BEA), the DOE’s operating contractor for Idaho National Laboratory (INL), to support the development of Lightbridge Fuel™. The framework agreements use an innovative structure that consistsconsist of an “umbrella” Strategic Partnership Project Agreement (SPPA) and an “umbrella” Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA),CRADA, each with BEA, with an initial duration of seven years.BEA.

Added

During 2025, previous task statements under both the SPPA and CRADA were modified to increase potential amounts payable to BEA. The duration of the umbrella SPPA was also extended from 7 to 12 years, and the performance period of the umbrella CRADA was extended from September 27, 2029 to September 27, 2032. In the fourth quarter of 2025, the Company and BEA entered into several new project task statements under the SPPA for BEA to provide technical consultation on drafting a fuel qualification plan, post-irradiation examination of fuel specimens, and code development for safety analysis and fuel performance modeling.

Removed

We anticipate that the initial phase of work under the two agreements that has been released will culminate in casting and extrusion of unclad fuel material samples using enriched uranium supplied by the DOE that will subsequently be inserted for irradiation testing in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at INL. The initial phase of work aims to generate irradiation performance data for Lightbridge’s delta-phase uranium-zirconium alloy relating to various thermophysical properties. The data will support fuel performance modeling and regulatory licensing efforts for commercial deployment of Lightbridge Fuel™. We use a rolling wave planning approach for project management purposes on the released scopes of work. It is an iterative planning technique in which the work to be accomplished in the near term is planned in detail, while work further in the future is planned at a higher level. As such, periodic revisions to the scope and/or cost estimates are anticipated.

Removed

The Company anticipates entering into additional modifications to the Project Task Statements (PTS) under the SPPA and/or CRADA with INL to expand the scope of work, including performing additional extrusions, updating the experiment design for irradiation testing of coupon samples in the ATR, as well as other potential activities. We are discussing these additional scopes and timing of work with INL to be performed under the two “umbrella” agreements with BEA; which we anticipate will increase our R&D expenses for the SPPA and/or CRADA. In late 2024, we worked with INL to re-baseline the project scope, schedule, and cost estimate at completion. As a result, the expected cost estimate at completion was increased by approximately $2.0 million. The successful execution of this project is subject to risks, including potential delays, cost overruns, regulatory challenges, and changes in funding availability, and if the project scope does increase, then the project will be successfully executed or completed. Regardless of whether further project modifications occur, INL has indicated to the Company that due to resource and manufacturing equipment constraints, INL may not be able to meet the Company’s preferred project timeline, and that the total project cost will exceed the current budget.

Removed

We anticipate that subsequent phases of work under the two umbrella agreements that have not yet been released may include post-irradiation examination of the irradiated fuel material coupons, loop irradiation testing in the ATR, and post-irradiation examination of one or more uranium-zirconium fuel rodlets, as well as transient experiments in the Transient Reactor Test Facility at INL.

Removed

On March 26, 2024, the Company and BEA entered into Modification No. 2 PTS under the SPPA, dated December 9, 2022, as amended on May 23, 2023, by and between the Company and BEA. Pursuant to the terms of Modification No. 2, the potential amounts payable by the Company to reimburse BEA for its expenses and employee time were increased by approximately $0.6 million, bringing the total estimated cost for the work to be performed under the “umbrella” SPPA to $1.7 million.

Removed

On October 24, 2024, the Company and BEA entered into Modification No. 3 PTS under the SPPA, dated December 9, 2022, as amended on May 23, 2023 and March 26, 2024, by and between the Company and BEA. Pursuant to the terms of Modification No. 3, the potential amounts payable by the Company to reimburse BEA for its expenses and employee time were increased by approximately $0.3 million, bringing the total estimated cost for the work to be performed under the “umbrella” SPPA to approximately $2.0 million.

Removed

On January 16, 2025 the Company and BEA entered into Modification No. 3 PTS under the CRADA, dated September 27, 2022, as amended on May 22, 2023, May30, 2023, by and between the Company and BEA. Pursuant to the terms of Modification No. 3, the potential amounts payable by the Company to reimburse BEA for its expenses and employee time were increased from $2.6 million by approximately $1.6 million, bringing the total estimated cost for the work to be performed under the “umbrella” CRADA to $4.2 million. This modification also required that a $0.6 million advance payment be made, which was paid on January 16, 2025.

Reworded

After Modificationaccounting No.for 3,all to the PTS under the CRADAmodifications and thenew anticipatedproject Modificationtask No. 4 to the PTS under the SPPA, totalstatements, cash payments from the Company to BEA under both AgreementsCRADA and SPPA are estimated at approximately $6.5$19.5 million (excluding project contingencies) on a cost reimbursable basis over the performance periodsperiods. underDuring the2025, initialwe releases.expensed $2.9 million of costs reimbursable to BEA, resulting in cumulative expenses of $5.4 million recorded to date and $14.1 million remaining in future cost reimbursements, if and when incurred by BEA.

Added

The successful execution of this project is subject to risks, including potential delays, cost overruns, regulatory challenges, and changes in funding availability, and if the project scope does increase, then the project will be successfully executed or completed. Regardless of whether further project modifications occur, INL has indicated to the Company that due to resource and manufacturing equipment constraints, INL may not be able to meet the Company’s preferred project timeline, and that the total project cost will exceed the current budget.

Added

Purchase of High-Performance Computer for Fuel Modeling

Added

During the fourth quarter of 2025, the Company completed the purchase of a HPC. The HPC is specifically configured for advanced nuclear modeling and requires specialized software and environmental conditions and provides a significant expansion of computational capability necessary for us to continue developing and simulating the viability of our nuclear fuel technology. To support the HPC, the Company also entered into agreements with additional vendors to provide co-location services, hardware/software management services, and additional nuclear simulation software. Costs for the HPC and related services and software are expensed as incurred and included in research and development expenses. Such items totaled approximately $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2025.

Removed

Romania Feasibility Study of Lightbridge Fuel™ for use in CANDU reactors On October 16, 2023, we engaged Institutul de Cercetări Nucleare Pitești, a subsidiary of Regia Autonoma Tehnologii pentru Energia Nucleara (RATEN ICN) in Romania to perform an engineering study to assess the compatibility and suitability of Lightbridge Fuel™ for use in CANDU reactors. This assessment covers key areas including mechanical design, neutronics analysis, and thermal and thermal-hydraulic evaluations. The findings from this engineering study will play an important role in guiding future economic evaluations and navigating potential regulatory licensing-related issues for potential use of Lightbridge Fuel™ in CANDU reactors. On July 2, 2024, we issued a change order adding a new task to the remaining scope of this engineering study. Following the change order, the Company paid a total fee of approximately $0.2 million for this engineering study, which was completed in 2024. We anticipate performing additional studies with RATEN ICN.

Removed

Nuclear Energy University Program Awards

Removed

Texas A&M University (TAMU), NuScale Power, and Structural Integrity Associates are working on a 3-year study of our nuclear fuel, led by TAMU. The TAMU study is expected to be completed in 2026. In mid-2023, TAMU was awarded $1.0 million by the DOE’s Nuclear Energy University Program (NEUP) R&D Awards to conduct this study. The project entails a characterization of the performance of the Lightbridge Fuel™ Helical Cruciform advanced fuel design, which will generate sets of experimental data on friction factor, flow, and heat transfer behavior under NuScale’s SMR simulated normal and off-normal conditions.

Removed

We previously announced the ongoing NEUP project with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). The study led by MIT and funded by DOE relates to evaluation of accident tolerant fuels (ATFs) in various SMRs. The project aims to simulate the fuel and safety performance of Lightbridge Fuel™ for the NuScale SMR and provide scoping analysis to improve the safety and economics of water-cooled SMRs. In October 2024, MIT presented a technical paper with preliminary safety evaluation results at the TopFuel 2024 Conference in Grenoble, France. According to MIT, the results have shown promising safety and performance benefits for Lightbridge Fuel™. Compared to conventional fuel, Lightbridge Fuel™ demonstrated improved thermal-hydraulic margins, lower operating temperatures, and greater potential for power uprates, which contributes to enhancing reactor economics.

Removed

We do not have any performance obligations with the collaboration teams working on the above-mentioned projects and will not receive any revenue or record any economic benefits from these awards.

Removed

Future Steps Toward Our Fuel Development and Timeline For The Commercialization of Our Nuclear Fuel Assemblies

Removed

We anticipate fuel development milestones for Lightbridge Fuel™ over the next 2-3 years will consist of the following:

Removed

The long-term milestones towards development and commercialization of nuclear fuel assemblies include, among other things, irradiating nuclear material samples and prototype fuel rods with enriched uranium in test reactors, conducting post-irradiation examination of irradiated material samples and/or prototype fuel rods, performing thermal-hydraulic experiments, performing seismic and other out-of-reactor experiments, performing advanced computer modeling and simulations to support fuel qualification, designing a lead test assembly (LTA), entering into a lead test rod/assembly agreement(s) with a host reactor(s), demonstrating the production process of lead test rods and/or lead test assemblies at a pilot-scale fuel fabrication facility and demonstrating the operation of lead test rods and/or lead test assemblies in commercial reactors.

Removed

The above future steps describe our current proposed approach to deploying Lightbridge Fuel™ in CANDU and/or U.S. PWR reactors.

Removed

There are inherent uncertainties in the cost and outcomes of the many steps needed for successful deployment of our fuel in commercial nuclear reactors, which makes it difficult to accurately predict the timing of the commercialization of our nuclear fuel technology. However, based on our best estimate and assuming adequate R&D funding levels, we expect to begin demonstration of lead test rods and/or possibly LTAs with our metallic fuel in commercial reactors in the 2030s and begin receiving purchase orders for initial fuel reload batches from utilities 15-20 years from now, with deployment of our nuclear fuel in the first reload batch in a commercial reactor taking place approximately two years thereafter. We are exploring ways of shortening this timeframe that may include securing access to expanded irradiation test loop capacity in existing or new research reactor facilities. Lightbridge aims to engage early with relevant nuclear regulators to inform our future R&D activities.

Reworded

FuelSoftware Code Development StrategyAgreements

Added

In October 2025, we entered into an Agreement for Safety Analysis Codes and Services for Lightbridge Fuel Designs with NAS, a provider of nuclear engineering analysis software. Under the agreement, NAS will perform code-development, benchmarking, and modeling services to support the creation of Lightbridge’s proprietary fuel-safety analysis methods and the adaptation of industry-standard computer codes for the Lightbridge Fuel™ helical-cruciform metallic U-Zr design. The estimated completion window is between October 2026 through January 2027. The total contract value is approximately $0.8 million, with milestone-based payments. The resulting software and analysis models will be owned by Lightbridge and are expected to strengthen Lightbridge’s internal capability to perform reactor safety analyses in support of future regulatory submissions and commercial fuel demonstrations.

Added

In December 2025, we also entered into an agreement with Studsvik Scandpower, a provider of nuclear fuel management software, to develop a transport methodology based on their existing software that will model the Lightbridge Fuel™ concept variant. We would need to separately purchase a license to this updated software after it has been developed to meet Lightbridge’s specifications. The total contract value for development of the code is approximately $0.3 million, payable upon the completion of work, expected in mid-2026.

Added

Costs for software code development are expensed as incurred and included in research and development expenses. However, work on these arrangements is in the preliminary stages or has not yet begun, and no expenses were incurred during the year ended December 31, 2025.

Added

Critical Heat Flux Test Program

Added

In February 2026, we entered into an initial engineering contract and statement of work with an organization providing specialized experimental services to assess the thermal and hydraulic (TH) performance of Lightbridge Fuel™ for use in water-cooled reactors. The experimental program will be carried out in phases and include: the design and fabrication of an electrically heated fuel simulator and its acceptance testing, nine-rod PWR critical heat flux tests, with an option for the Company to also choose to conduct nine-rod BWR critical power tests, a full scale TH test program to support the U.S. licensing of Lightbridge Fuel™ in commercial PWRs, and an option for the Company to also choose to conduct a full scale TH thermal test program to support the U.S. licensing of Lightbridge Fuel™ in commercial BWRs. Phase 1 work includes prototype fuel simulator design, fabrication, and acceptance testing and is estimated to take one year to complete and cost approximately $0.5 million.

Added

Romania Feasibility Study of Lightbridge Fuel™ for use in CANDU reactors As noted under Part I. Item 1. Business, we engaged RATEN ICN in Romania to perform an engineering study to assess the compatibility and suitability of Lightbridge Fuel™ for use in CANDU reactors. The findings from this engineering study will play an important role in guiding future economic evaluations and navigating potential regulatory licensing-related issues for potential use of Lightbridge Fuel™ in CANDU reactors. In August 2025, we entered into the 2025 RATEN ICN Agreement to evaluate conducting irradiation test(s) for several Lightbridge Fuel™ rodlets. The 2025 RATEN ICN Agreement provides for two phases: in Phase 1, RATEN ICN was to conduct scoping studies to develop preliminary experiment designs, evaluate infrastructure and equipment needs, and obtain cost and schedule estimates for potential new driver fuel, and in Phase 2, if the results of Phase 1 were acceptable to Lightbridge, RATEN ICN would implement refurbishments, procure equipment and driver fuel as needed, finalize experiment design, fabricate and operate the test assembly, and complete post-irradiation examination. Lightbridge would be responsible for supplying experimental fuel rodlets for use in the irradiation tests. The Phase 1 work was completed as of December 31, 2025. The Company is currently evaluating the results of the Phase 1 work. No decision has been made about the Phase 2 scope as of the date hereof.

Added

Commercialization Outlook and Key Drivers of Timing

Added

The long-term milestones towards development and commercialization of nuclear fuel assemblies include, among other things, irradiating nuclear material samples and prototype fuel rods with enriched uranium in test reactors, conducting post-irradiation examination of irradiated material samples and/or prototype fuel rods, performing thermal-hydraulic experiments, performing seismic and other out-of-reactor experiments, performing advanced computer modeling and simulations to support fuel qualification, designing an LTA, entering into a lead test rod/assembly agreement(s) with a host reactor(s), demonstrating the production process of our fuel including lead test rods and/or lead test assemblies at a planned LEFF and demonstrating the operation of lead test rods and/or lead test assemblies in commercial reactors.

Added

There are inherent uncertainties in the cost and outcomes of the many steps needed for successful deployment of our fuel in commercial nuclear reactors, which makes it difficult to accurately predict the timing of the commercialization of our nuclear fuel technology. Our ultimate commercial model remains under evaluation and may evolve as our fuel development progresses, regulatory pathways are clarified, and commercial partnerships are established. However, based on our best estimate and assuming adequate R&D funding levels, we expect to begin demonstration of lead test rods and/or possibly LTAs with our metallic fuel in commercial reactors in the mid-2030s and begin receiving purchase orders for initial fuel reload batches from utilities 15 years from now, with deployment of our nuclear fuel in the first reload batch in a commercial reactor taking place approximately two years thereafter. See Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors—”Risks Related to Our Business and to the Commercialization of Lightbridge Fuel™” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Added

We are exploring ways of shortening this timeframe that may include securing access to expanded irradiation test loop capacity in existing or new research reactor facilities and engaging early with nuclear regulators to inform them of our future R&D and licensing activities. There can be no assurance that our efforts will result in an accelerated commercialization timeline.

Added

Known Long-Term Industry Constraints and Uncertainties

Added

While our current research and development activities are not dependent on the commercial availability of HALEU in metallic form, the future commercialization of Lightbridge Fuel™ will require the establishment of a commercial-scale supply and fabrication capabilities. These matters and others are discussed further under Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors—”Risks Related to Our Business and to the Commercialization of Lightbridge Fuel™—Dependence on the Future Availability of Cost-Competitive Metallic HALEU and Commercial-Scale Fuel Fabrication Infrastructure” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Removed

We believe our metallic fuel can be used in different types of water-cooled commercial power reactors, such as pressurized water reactors (PWRs), boiling-water reactors (BWRs), Russian-designed water-cooled, water-moderated energetic reactors (VVERs), CANDUs, water-cooled SMRs, and water-cooled research reactors.

Removed

We have obtained patent validation in key countries that we believe would have a commercial market for our fuel and will continue to seek patent validation in countries that either currently operate or are expected to build and operate a large number of nuclear power reactors compatible with our fuel technology.

Removed

Below is a brief description of each key fuel development step leading up to a lead test assembly (LTA) operation in a commercial reactor.

Removed

Fuel Fabrication

Removed

In the short to medium term, we expect the development of the fabrication processes for Lightbridge Fuel™ to be performed utilizing existing facilities and equipment within the DOE national laboratory complex and other facilities. Discussions are currently ongoing with the INL to perform process development activities and establish the capability to manufacture development quantities of fuel rods for irradiation testing.

Removed

Fabrication of LTAs will require a dedicated pilot-scale fuel fabrication facility. We estimate the major scopes of work to establish a manufacturing capability for LTR/LTA could take several years to complete and require tens of millions of dollars in capital expenditures. Expanding that pilot-scale fuel fabrication facility to batch reload quantities would require a substantial additional capital investment in the manufacturing facility and equipment (in the order of hundreds of millions of dollars). These estimates assume sufficient funding availability and that the project receives prioritization by the DOE and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to facilitate access to the required quantities of the HALEU material and timely regulatory licensing of such a facility.

Removed

Nuclear Material/Coupon Sample Irradiation Test

Removed

Lightbridge’s irradiation testing program includes coupon irradiation of material samples of its uranium-zirconium fuel alloy which will allow characterization of the underlying thermophysical behavior of the fuel alloy. This project is currently underway with INL, and we expect insertion of fuel material coupons in the ATR in 2026 and completion of irradiation testing to full burnup and post-irradiation examination of the fuel material coupons in approximately several years thereafter. The data obtained from this program will be a fundamental component of Lightbridge’s accelerated fuel qualification approach described below as it will be used to inform and develop the physics-based models and simulations of the fuel rod behaviors.

Removed

Loop Irradiation Testing

Removed

The purpose of the loop irradiation testing of Lightbridge’s metallic fuel rods is to demonstrate the performance and behavior of the fuel rods under prototypic commercial reactor operating conditions typical of PWRs at a power level and burnup accumulation higher than the fuel would experience in normal operation in a commercial power plant. This will provide a physical demonstration of the capabilities of the fuel rods to ensure reactor safety. Such testing is expected to provide information of sufficient detail to validate the performance of individual fuel rods such that their behavior in normal operating conditions of a NRC-regulated nuclear power plant would be sufficiently well understood to request a license amendment from the NRC for operation of a LTA.

Removed

We plan on such a loop irradiation test to be performed in the ATR at INL. The ATR currently has limited irradiation loop test facilities; however, the planned installation of the new so-called “I-loops” in the coming years will increase the loop irradiation capacity of ATR for performing tests on Lightbridge Fuel™ in the desired test conditions.

Showing the first 60 of 132 changed paragraphs. The complete comparison will be part of Pro (coming soon). Meanwhile you can read the full text in the original filing.

What changed in the latest 10-Q

Comparing 10-Q filed 2026-08-06 (period ending 2026-06-30) with 10-Q filed 2026-04-30 (period ending 2026-03-31).

Risk Factors (10-Q Part II, Item 1A)

0new paragraphs
0removed paragraphs
0reworded paragraphs
30 → 30words in section

The section in the latest 10-Q reads in full:

There have been no material changes to our risk factors from the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.

No wording changes found in this section.

Full comparison: every changed paragraph (0)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) (10-Q Part I, Item 2)

23new paragraphs
9removed paragraphs
28reworded paragraphs
3,534 → 4,277words in section

New heading “Development of a Pilot-Scale Facility and Future Lightbridge Expandable Fuel Facility”

New heading “Condensed Consolidated Results of Operations - Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”

Removed heading “Development of a Lightbridge Expandable Fuel Facility”

Removed heading “Operating Expenses”

Largest changes (selected automatically by length and topic keywords; quoted verbatim, no commentary)

New text topics: artificial intelligence, labor
“The Company believes long-term industry trends continue to support investment in advanced nuclear technologies. Growing demand for reliable electricity, including demand associated with artificial intelligence computing, hyperscale data centers, electrification, advanced manufacturing, and energy security initiatives, has significantly increased interest in expanding nuclear generation and improving the performance of existing reactors. …”
see in full comparison
New text
“Condensed Consolidated Results of Operations - Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025”
see in full comparison
New text
“Development of a Pilot-Scale Facility and Future Lightbridge Expandable Fuel Facility”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“Development of a Lightbridge Expandable Fuel Facility”
see in full comparison
Removed text
“Operating Expenses”
see in full comparison
New text topics: labor
“In connection with these efforts, the Company may decide, from time to time, to apply to programs available through various governmental agencies that offer funding, regulatory flexibility, or other support related to the advancement of its nuclear fuel technology. Such programs may require significant capital investment and could materially increase research and development activities, capital expenditures, manufacturing capabilities and staffing over the next several years. For example, the Company recently submitted an application to the U.S. …”
see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (60)

Green = added, red = removed. Unchanged paragraphs and tables are not shown. Read the complete text in the original filing.

Reworded

At Lightbridge, we are developing nextadvanced generationmetallic nuclear fuel for existing and new water-cooled reactors thatdesigned could significantlyto improve the economics and safety of existing and new nuclear power plants and enhance proliferation resistance of spent nuclear fuel while supplying clean energy to the electric grid or to “behind the meter” customers for electric power, including data centers. We believe our metallic fuel could offer significant economic and safety benefits over traditional nuclear fuel, primarily because of the superior heat transfer properties and the resulting lower operating temperature of our all-metal fuel. Data centers will need massive, constant power that we believe nuclear power can provide. Advances in reactor technology, combined with growing corporate and governmental support for clean energy, can position nuclear power as a cornerstone of future energy strategies for data-intensive industries, which may be willing to pay a premium for reliable, clean, and sustainable baseload electricity.

Reworded

We believe our metallic fuel can be used in different types of water-cooled commercial power reactors, such as pressurized water reactors, boiling-water reactors, Russian-designed water-coolerwater-cooled commercial power reactors, Canada Deuterium Uranium heavy water reactors, water-cooled small modular reactors, and water-cooled research reactors. We have obtained patent validation in key countries that we believe would have a commercial market for our fuel and will continue to seek patent validation in countries that either currently operate or are expected to build and operate a large number of nuclear power reactors compatible with our fuel technology.

Added

The Company believes long-term industry trends continue to support investment in advanced nuclear technologies. Growing demand for reliable electricity, including demand associated with artificial intelligence computing, hyperscale data centers, electrification, advanced manufacturing, and energy security initiatives, has significantly increased interest in expanding nuclear generation and improving the performance of existing reactors. Advances in reactor technology, combined with growing corporate and governmental support for nuclear energy, can position nuclear power as a cornerstone of future energy strategies for data-intensive industries, which recent evidence suggests may be willing to pay a premium for reliable, clean, and sustainable baseload electricity. The Company believes these trends may increase the long-term market opportunities for advanced nuclear fuel technologies designed to improve reactor economics, increase power output, and enhance operational flexibility. Accordingly, the Company's current research, engineering, manufacturing planning, and strategic collaborations are focused on advancing the technical and commercial readiness of Lightbridge Fuel™ to address these long-term market opportunities.

Added

The long-term milestones marking progress towards development and commercialization of nuclear fuel assemblies include, among other matters, irradiating nuclear material samples and prototype fuel rods with enriched uranium in test reactors, conducting post-irradiation examination of irradiated material samples and/or prototype fuel rods, performing thermal-hydraulic experiments, performing seismic and other out-of-reactor experiments, performing advanced computer modeling and simulations to support fuel qualification, designing a lead test assembly (LTA), entering into one or more lead test rod/assembly agreements with host reactors, demonstrating the production process of the fuel including lead test rods and/or LTAs, and demonstrating the operation of lead test rods and/or LTAs in commercial reactors.

Added

There are inherent uncertainties in the cost and outcomes of the many steps needed for successful deployment of Lightbridge Fuel™ in commercial nuclear reactors, which makes it difficult to accurately predict the timing of the commercialization of our nuclear fuel technology. Our ultimate commercial model remains under evaluation and may evolve as our fuel development progresses, regulatory pathways are further clarified, and commercial partnerships are further established. See Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors—“Risks Related to Our Business and to the Commercialization of Lightbridge Fuel™” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.

Added

Development of a Pilot-Scale Facility and Future Lightbridge Expandable Fuel Facility

Added

The Company is evaluating a potential site location and developing a conceptual design for a Lightbridge Expandable Fuel Facility (LEFF) to support the possible future fabrication of Lightbridge Fuel™ for use in commercial reactors. The Company also continually evaluates a variety of strategic opportunities that could accelerate the commercialization of its advanced nuclear fuel technology, including the potential establishment of a pilot-scale fuel fabrication capability to support the future manufacture of LTAs.

Added

In connection with these efforts, the Company may decide, from time to time, to apply to programs available through various governmental agencies that offer funding, regulatory flexibility, or other support related to the advancement of its nuclear fuel technology. Such programs may require significant capital investment and could materially increase research and development activities, capital expenditures, manufacturing capabilities and staffing over the next several years. For example, the Company recently submitted an application to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) seeking authorization and collaboration through the agency’s Nuclear Energy Launch Pad program relating to such a pilot-scale fuel fabrication capability. The requested authorization, if obtained and ultimately pursued by the Company, could enable earlier fabrication and testing of LTAs and accelerate the Company's commercialization timeline.

Added

The construction of a pilot-scale facility could commence as early as 2027, subject to various factors, including those described below. This initiative would represent a significant potential expansion of the Company’s operations beyond its current R&D activities. While the scope, timing, and cost of constructing such a facility cannot be reasonably estimated at this time, the Company expects that the capital required to design, license, and construct any pilot-scale facility or LEFF would be substantial. The timing, amount, and sources of any related financing activities will depend on a number of factors, including the progress of the Company’s development programs, regulatory considerations, market conditions, and the availability of strategic partnerships or other funding sources. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain such financing on acceptable terms, or at all, nor can there be any assurance that the Company will pursue the construction of the fabrication facility.

Added

Reconstitution of the Nuclear Utility Fuel Advisory Board

Added

In June 2026, the Company launched a reconstituted Nuclear Utility Fuel Advisory Board, which is intended to provide the Company with input directly from utility industry representatives regarding fuel development priorities, licensing considerations, deployment strategies, operational requirements, and commercialization planning.

Added

The advisory board serves in an advisory capacity only and does not constitute a commitment by any participant to purchase, license, deploy, or otherwise utilize the Company's fuel technology.

Reworded

Updates to Idaho National Laboratory Agreements

Reworded

In 2022, wethe Company entered into agreements with Batelle Energy Alliance, LLC (BEA), the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) operating contractor for Idaho National Laboratory (INL), to support the development of Lightbridge Fuel™. The framework agreements consist of an “umbrella” Strategic Partnership Project Agreement (SPPA) and an “umbrella” Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA), each with BEA. The initialCompany phasecontinues ofto perform work aimsunder toits generateSPPA irradiationand performanceCRADA datawith BEA, as previously described in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for Lightbridge’sthe delta-phaseyear uranium-zirconiumended alloyDecember relating31, to various thermophysical properties.2025. The dataCompany willperiodically supportupdates fuelproject performancescopes, modelingschedules and regulatorycost licensingestimates efforts for commercial deployment of Lightbridge Fuel™. We useusing a rolling wave planning approach for project management purposes on the released scopes of work. It is an iterative planning technique in which the work to be accomplished in the near term is planned in detail, while work further in the future is planned at a higher level. As such, periodic revisions to the scope and/or cost estimates are anticipated.

Reworded

Other Updates to the SPPA and CRADA

Reworded

In MarchJune 2026, wethe Company entered into Modification No. 45 to CRADA Project Task Statement (PTS) No. 1No.1 with BEA to extend the performance period end date through September 2032 and increase advanced funding by $0.3 million, with no increase to the total estimated reimbursable cost.cost by approximately $1.1 million, bringing the total estimated cost for the work to be performed under CRADA PTS No.1 to $5.4 million.

Reworded

In April 2026, the Company entered into SPPA PTS No. 6 to support the development of coextruded fuel rod components for future irradiation testing. This program builds on prior INL fabrication work and is intended to further refine manufacturing processes and materials necessary to produce fuel rods and rodlets in their final cross-sectional configurations. Initial process development activities will be conducted using depleted uranium, with the expectation that, upon successful demonstration, these processes may be applied to enriched uranium to produce fuel rod segments for irradiation experiments at test reactors, including the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at INL.. The program is expected to help bridge the transition from earlier-stage fabrication development and initial coupon fuel material samples currently undergoing irradiation testing in the ATR to the production of irradiation rod segment test specimens. The scope of work includes enhancements to fabrication processes and equipment, development and testing of key materials (including central displacer alloys and cladding behavior), and validation of coextrusion techniques for both cylindrical and multi-lobe fuel designs. The program also includes preparation of fuel rod segment specimens, including those with controlled defects, to support non-destructive evaluation calibration and irradiation testing. The total estimated cost of SPPA PTS No.6 is approximately $4.6 million over an expected performance period of 36 months. Costs are incurred on a reimbursable basis, with advance and monthly funding provided by the Company. The Company is not obligated to continue work beyond the estimated cost without additional authorization. Actual expenditures may differ from this amount based on the scope and timing of work performed through the issuance of additional PTSs to BEA. This effort represents a key step in the Company’s ongoing fuel qualification strategy, supporting the advancement from process development toward irradiation testing and future commercialization activities.

Added

In March 2026, the Company entered into Modification No. 4 to CRADA PTS No. 1 with BEA to extend the performance period end date through September 2032 and increase advanced funding by $0.3 million, with no increase to the total estimated reimbursable cost.

Reworded

As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company expects to pay an aggregate $19.5$25.2 million to BEA under the CRADA and the SPPA on a cost reimbursable basis over the performance periods. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, $6.0a cumulative total of $7.1 million has been cumulatively expensed and the aggregate funding commitment remaining under these agreements is $13.5 million. In April 2026, the Company entered into SPPA PTS No. 6 with BEA, with an estimated total cost of approximately $4.6$18.1 million. These obligations are generally cancellable with 30-60 days’ notice and, therefore, are not considered firm commitments, and are not expensed until incurred. Actual expenditures may differ from this amount based on the scope and timing of work performed through the issuance of additional PTSs to BEA.

Removed

Development of a Lightbridge Expandable Fuel Facility

Removed

The Company is evaluating a potential site location and working on a conceptual design for a Lightbridge Expandable Fuel Facility (LEFF) to support the possible future fabrication of Lightbridge Fuel™ for use in commercial reactors. The construction of such a facility might commence as early as late 2027, subject to various factors, including those described below. This initiative would represent a significant potential expansion of the Company’s operations beyond its current R&D activities. While the scope, timing, and cost of constructing such a facility cannot be reasonably estimated at this time, the Company expects that the capital required to design, license, and construct the LEFF would be substantial. The timing, amount, and sources of any related financing activities will depend on a number of factors, including the progress of the Company’s development programs, regulatory considerations, market conditions, and the availability of strategic partnerships or other funding sources. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain such financing on acceptable terms, or at all, nor can there be any assurance that the Company will pursue the construction of the fabrication facility.

Removed

Memorandum of Understanding with Oklo, Inc.

Removed

In January 2025, we entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Oklo, Inc. (Oklo), a developer of advanced micro-reactors designed to provide clean, reliable, and affordable energy. The MOU contemplates potential areas of collaboration, including: (i) a preliminary evaluation of the feasibility of co-locating a Lightbridge commercial-scale fuel fabrication facility with Oklo’s proposed commercial fuel fabrication facility; (ii) exploring opportunities for collaboration on the reprocessing and recycling of spent uranium-zirconium fuel; and (iii) evaluating other potential areas of mutual interest. In April 2026, the term of the MOU was extended through December 31, 2026.

Removed

During our preliminary evaluation of co-location at Oklo’s proposed Idaho Falls site, we identified regulatory considerations associated with the application of different licensing frameworks, including oversight by the DOE for Oklo’s proposed activities and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission for our commercial fuel fabrication facility. Based on these considerations, co-location at this site with Oklo under separate licensing frameworks is not currently being pursued. We are currently evaluating potential sites for a standalone Lightbridge fuel fabrication facility.

Removed

We also continue to contemplate co-locating a Lightbridge fuel fabrication facility with an Oklo facility at a site where a coordinated licensing approach may be implemented, and we continue to assess the potential collaboration opportunities with Oklo in areas such as recycling and reprocessing of spent uranium-zirconium fuel; however, no definitive agreements have been reached, and there can be no assurance that any such collaboration will be realized.

Reworded

In December 2025, the Company entered into a Master Services Agreement (MSA) with Amentum Technology Inc. (Amentum) relating to the performance of activities by Amentum in support of the co-location feasibility study under the MOU with Oklo described above, as well as othervarious activities as the Company and Amentum may agree from time to time. TheIn June 2026, the Company isentered in the process of finalizinginto a new task order with Amentum to conduct afeasibility and site selection studystudies and performdevelop a conceptual design for a standalone LEFFLEFF, with completion of deliverables expected in 2026.early 2027. The Company expects to incur approximately $2.4 million of R&D expenses under this task order.

Removed

The long-term milestones towards development and commercialization of nuclear fuel assemblies include, among other things, irradiating nuclear material samples and prototype fuel rods with enriched uranium in test reactors, conducting post-irradiation examination of irradiated material samples and/or prototype fuel rods, performing thermal-hydraulic experiments, performing seismic and other out-of-reactor experiments, performing advanced computer modeling and simulations to support fuel qualification, designing a lead test assembly, entering into one or more lead test rod/assembly agreements with host reactors, demonstrating the production process of our fuel including lead test rods and/or lead test assemblies at a planned LEFF and demonstrating the operation of lead test rods and/or lead test assemblies in commercial reactors.

Removed

There are inherent uncertainties in the cost and outcomes of the many steps needed for successful deployment of our fuel in commercial nuclear reactors, which makes it difficult to accurately predict the timing of the commercialization of our nuclear fuel technology. Our ultimate commercial model remains under evaluation and may evolve as our fuel development progresses, regulatory pathways are clarified, and commercial partnerships are established. See Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors—“Risks Related to Our Business and to the Commercialization of Lightbridge Fuel™” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.

Reworded

For a discussion of the accounting judgments and estimates that we have identified as critical in the preparation of our financial statements, please see Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—“Critical Accounting Estimates” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. There have been no significant changes in our critical accounting policies and estimates during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.

Added

During the first half of 2026, the Company continued accelerating the development of Lightbridge Fuel™. Operating expenses increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 primarily as a result of the Company's continued investment in engineering, fuel development, manufacturing readiness activities, project development, and organizational infrastructure supporting the long-term development of Lightbridge Fuel™. The Company generated increased interest income from its significantly higher cash balances invested primarily in U.S. Treasury securities.

Reworded

Condensed Consolidated Results of Operations - Three Months Ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025

Removed

Operating Expenses

Reworded

G&A expenses increased by $0.8$1.2 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The increase was primarily due to a:

Reworded

Total stock-based compensation included in G&A expenses was $1.8$1.0 million and $1.1$0.5 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and March 31, 2025, respectively. The amount for the three months ended June 30, 2026 includes the reversal of $0.5 million of previously recognized stock-based compensation related to a performance milestone under our Tranche-based PSAs that is no longer deemed probable of achievement.

Reworded

The following table presents our total R&D expenses for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 (in millions):

Reworded

R&D expenses increased by $1.6$2.4 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. The increase was primarily due to a:

Reworded

Total stock-based compensation included in R&D expenses was $0.7$0.4 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The amount for the three months ended June 30, 2026 includes the reversal of $0.2 million of previously recognized stock-based compensation related to a performance milestone under our Tranche-based PSAs that is no longer deemed probable of achievement.

Reworded

We expect to significantly increase our R&D spend as we evaluate a potential site location and work on a conceptual design for any pilot-scale facility or the LEFF and as we continue to hire additional engineers in the near future to focus on fuel fabrication development, irradiation testing programs, and our collaboration with the DOE at INL.

Reworded

There was an increase in interest income of $0.9$1.3 million due to higher cash balances, which resulted in an increase in interest income earned from the purchase of treasury bills and from our bank savings account for the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, as compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.

Added

Condensed Consolidated Results of Operations - Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025

Added

The following table presents our operating results and the change in amounts for the periods indicated (in millions):

Added

General and Administrative

Added

G&A expenses increased by $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was due to:

Added

Total stock-based compensation included in G&A expenses was $2.8 million and $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The amount for the six months ended June 30, 2026 includes the reversal of $0.5 million of previously recognized stock-based compensation related to a performance milestone under our Tranche-based PSAs that is no longer deemed probable of achievement. The amount for the six months ended June 30, 2025 includes $0.5 million of stock-based compensation expense related to accelerated vesting of RSAs in connection with a separation agreement with a former employee.

Added

Research and Development

Added

The following table presents our total R&D expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (in millions):

Added

R&D expenses increased by $4.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was due to:

Added

Total stock-based compensation included in R&D expenses was $1.1 million and $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The amount for the six months ended June 30, 2026 includes the reversal of $0.2 million of previously recognized stock-based compensation related to a performance milestone under our Tranche-based PSAs that is no longer deemed probable of achievement.

Added

Interest Income

Added

There was an increase in interest income of $2.2 million due to higher cash balances, which resulted in an increase in interest income earned from the purchase of treasury bills and from our bank savings account for the six months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025.

Reworded

We assess our liquidity based on our ability to fund the cash requirements of our R&D activities, G&A expenses, contractual obligations, and other operating needs. Based on our current level ofprojected operating expenses and our available cash resources, we believe we have sufficient liquidity to fund our operations and meet our anticipated cash requirements for at least the next 12 months from the date of this filing. Our longer-term liquidity will depend on our ability to obtain additional financing, as our existing capital resources are not sufficient to fund our long-term operations, R&D activities, and commercialization efforts. Planned expenditures are expected to include the continued expansion of engineering and technical personnel for research and development activities, manufacturing readiness initiatives, project development activities including establishing a pilot-scale facility, testing and qualification programs, regulatory support activities, and other commercialization-related initiatives. The Company also expects to continue investing in the organizational infrastructure necessary to support these activities as it transitions from a primarily research-focused organization toward manufacturing readiness activities.

Reworded

At MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we had cash and cash equivalents of $215.7$237.5 million, as compared to $201.9 million at December 31, 2025, an increase of $13.8$35.6 million. We raised net proceeds of $18.6$44.4 million from the sale of approximately 1.43.8 million shares of common stock during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026. Our net cash used in operating activities for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, was $4.8$8.3 million. We do not anticipate any material incoming cash flows from operations for the foreseeable future, and we expect to continue funding our business primarily through our ATM program or other equity offerings.

Reworded

Due to the uncertainties inherent in our R&D programs and the broader industry environment, we are unable to reliably estimate our total cash requirements over the full R&D period or beyond the next 12 months. We expect our expenditures to increase over time as we advance the development and potential commercialization of our Lightbridge Fuel™. We expect that significant additional capital will be required over an extended period to advance Lightbridge Fuel™ through development and toward commercial deployment. The amount and timing of future funding needs will depend on technical progress, regulatory requirements, design and construction costs of any pilot-scale facility and the LEFF, partnering arrangements, and the availability of government support. At this stage, we cannot reliably estimate the total funding required to reach commercial deployment. We currently intend to fund these activities through a mix of equity financing, strategic partnerships, and potential government grants or awards, but there can be no assurance that these additional sources of capital will be made available on terms acceptable to us, or at all.

Reworded

Our current primary source of liquidity is potential proceeds from our ATM equity offerings. During the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, we sold approximately 1.43.8 million shares of our common stock under our sales agreement with Jefferies LLC, receiving net proceeds (less sales commissions and expenses) of $18.6$44.4 million.

Reworded

We have a $350 million shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-291837). As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, approximately $122.9$96.1 million of our common stock remained available for issuance and sale under the Company’s $150 million at-the-market offering program pursuant to the related prospectus supplement, as amended.supplement.

Reworded

As noted previously, we have entered into PTSs with BEA, the operating contractor of INL, in collaboration with the DOE, which statements set forth the initial scopes of work and funding commitments under the SPPA and CRADA umbrella agreements. Performance of work under these agreements may be terminated at any time by either party, without any liability, after the effective date of termination, upon 30 days’ written notice under the SPPA and 60 days’ written notice under the CRADA. In the event of termination, the Company shall be responsible for BEA’s costs (including the closeout costs), through the effective date of termination, but in no event shall the Company’s cost responsibility exceed the total estimated cost stated in each PTS and any subsequent modification to the PTS. As of MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the aggregate funding commitment remaining from the Company to BEA, if and when incurred, would not exceed $13.5$18.1 million. In April 2026, the Company entered into SPPA PTS No. 6 with BEA, with an estimated total cost of approximately $4.6 million.

Reworded

The following table provides detailed information about our net cash flows for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and 2025 (in millions):

Reworded

Cash used in operating activities increased by $1.5$2.7 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 as compared to the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. This increase was primarily due to increased cash expenditures on R&D and G&A expenses, partially offset by higher interest income, reflecting increased average cash balances following equity financings. The changes in working capital induring the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, which2026 included ana $1.3 million increase in prepaid expenses and other assets ofand $1.4a million,$1.2 were partially offset by anmillion increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilitiesliabilities, resulting in a net working capital change of $0.4$(0.1) million. The changes in working capital during the six months ended June 30, 2025 included a $0.2 million increase in prepaid expenses and other assets and a $0.8 million increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, resulting in a net working capital change of $0.6 million.

Reworded

Cash provided by financing activities decreased by $1.6$19.6 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 as compared to the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025. This decrease was primarily due to a $1.6$18.7 million decrease in net proceeds received from the issuance of common stock under our ATM program andprogram, a $0.2$0.6 million decrease in net proceeds from the exercise of stock options, partially offset byand a $0.2$0.3 million decreaseincrease in the payment of withholding taxes related to the net share settlement of equity awards.

Reworded

Net cash provided by our ATM program was $18.6$44.4 million from the sale of approximately 1.43.8 million shares of common stock for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 and $20.2$63.1 million from the sale of approximately 2.66.2 million shares of common stock for the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025.

LTBR insider buying and selling (Form 4)

Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 0 Form 4 filings and open-market sales in 6 filings (3 insiders, 5 trade dates, 20,208 shares, about $178.9K; 5 of these filings say the sales were made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan). Net open-market shares: -20,208 (purchases minus sales); net value about -$178.9K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.

Trade dateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueOwned afterFiling
2026-10-01Goodman Sherri
Director
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
1,116$6.29 $7.0K69,130 SEC
2026-09-01Chakraborty Sweta
Director
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
717$7.43 $5.3K57,132 SEC
2026-08-28Mushakov Andrey
EVP & Chief Operating Officer
Shares withheld for tax 6,817$7.55 $51.5K457,668 SEC
2026-08-28Grae Seth
Director, President and CEO
Shares withheld for tax 10,930$7.55 $82.5K872,084 SEC
2026-08-28Holcombe Scott Randall
SVP & Chief Technology Officer
Shares withheld for tax 103$7.55 $7789,153 SEC
2026-08-28Holcombe Scott Randall
SVP & Chief Technology Officer
Shares withheld for tax 3,730$7.55 $28.2K312,717 SEC
2026-08-28Goldman Larry
CFO
Shares withheld for tax 7,139$7.55 $53.9K377,688 SEC
2026-08-11Tobin Mark Robert
Director
Open-market sale 15,000$8.99 $134.8K66,669 SEC
2026-08-06Magraw Daniel B
Director
Grant/award 10,000— —54,686 SEC
2026-08-06Tobin Mark Robert
Director
Grant/award 10,000— —81,669 SEC
2026-08-06Goodman Sherri
Director
Grant/award 10,000— —70,246 SEC
2026-08-06Funches Jesse L.
Director
Grant/award 10,000— —84,022 SEC
2026-08-06Chakraborty Sweta
Director
Grant/award 10,000— —57,849 SEC
2026-08-06Mushakov Andrey
EVP & Chief Operating Officer
Grant/award 84,000— —464,485 SEC
2026-08-06Grae Seth
Director, President and CEO
Grant/award 105,000— —883,014 SEC
2026-08-06Goldman Larry
CFO
Grant/award 65,000— —384,827 SEC
2026-08-06Holcombe Scott Randall
SVP & Chief Technology Officer
Grant/award 65,000— —316,447 SEC
2026-08-06Holcombe Scott Randall
SVP & Chief Technology Officer
Grant/award 4,000— —9,256 SEC
2026-07-01Chakraborty Sweta
Director
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
1,143$9.29 $10.6K47,849 SEC
2026-07-01Goodman Sherri
Director
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
1,116$9.29 $10.4K60,246 SEC
2026-06-22Goodman Sherri
Director
Open-market sale
10b5-1 plan
1,116$9.58 $10.7K61,362 SEC
2026-04-03Goldman Larry
CFO
Shares withheld for tax 9,013$11.09 $100.0K319,827 SEC
2026-04-03Mushakov Andrey
EVP, Nuclear Operations
Shares withheld for tax 8,597$11.09 $95.3K380,485 SEC
2026-04-03Grae Seth
Director, President and CEO
Shares withheld for tax 13,256$11.09 $147.0K778,014 SEC

Well-known investors holding LTBR (13F)

InvestorQuarterSharesReported value% of their 13FChange vs prior quarter
Millennium Management (Israel Englander) COM2026-06-30698,893$6.1M0.0%Added 197%
Renaissance Technologies COM2026-06-30338,400$3.0M0.0%Reduced 48%
D. E. Shaw & Co. COM2026-06-30166,514$1.5M0.0%Added 200%
AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) COM2026-06-3057,045$501.4K0.0%Added 239%
Two Sigma Investments COM2026-06-3026,451$232.5K0.0%Reduced 81%
Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) COM2026-06-3025,153$221.1K0.0%Reduced 70%

13F reports are filed up to 45 days after quarter end and show long U.S. equity positions only; options positions are omitted here.

Coming soon: email alerts when LTBR files, watchlists and downloadable comparisons.