LUCD 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Lucid Diagnostics Inc. · Nasdaq · Surgical & Medical Instruments & Apparatus · CIK 1799011 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
Removed heading “FDA has proposed a policy under which it would phase out its general enforcement discretion approach for LDTs so that IVDs manufactured at a laboratory would generally fall under the same enforcement approach as other IVDs. While we are confident that the proposed policy will not have a material impact on our business, there can be no assurance that will be the case.”
Largest changes
“We perform the EsoGuard test in our own CLIA-certified commercial clinical laboratory, and like all clinical laboratories which perform non-research laboratory testing on human samples in the U.S., it is regulated by CMS through CLIA and associated federal regulations set forth in 42 CFR § 493, as well as through other federal and state laws and regulations. Federal CLIA requirements and laws of certain states impose certification requirements for clinical laboratories, establish standards for quality assurance and quality control, among other things. …”see in full comparison
“We have currently hold the certificates, licenses, and accreditations required to perform our clinical laboratory testing. Clinical laboratories are subject to periodic inspection by federal and state regulators and accrediting bodies, and may be subject to sanctions for noncompliance. and to sanctions for failing to comply with applicable requirements. …”see in full comparison
“FDA has proposed a policy under which it would phase out its general enforcement discretion approach for LDTs so that IVDs manufactured at a laboratory would generally fall under the same enforcement approach as other IVDs. While we are confident that the proposed policy will not have a material impact on our business, there can be no assurance that will be the case.”see in full comparison
PAVmed currently has approximatelysee in full comparison$6.6$15.0 millionconvertibleof debt outstanding, which matures inDecemberFebruary2025, and has from time to time been in default of the financial covenants thereunder, although PAVmed has received a waiver of those financial covenants through December 31, 2025.2029. While the holder of such indebtedness has agreed in the past to waive anysuchnon-compliancenon-compliance,with the terms of other debt it has held, there can be no assurance that it will do so in the future. If the debtholder elects to accelerate PAVmed’s indebtedness rather than waiving any such non-compliance, it is likely PAVmed will not have sufficient cash on hand to pay the amounts due on an acceleration, in which case it may be required to satisfy its obligations through the transfer of its shares of common stock of the Company to such debtholder.
“On May 6, 2024, the FDA issued a final rule aimed at helping to ensure the safety and effectiveness of LDTs. The rule amends the FDA’s regulations to make explicit that IVDs are devices under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) including when the manufacturer of the IVD is a laboratory. …”see in full comparison
“The FDA also intends to exercise enforcement discretion and generally not enforce some or all applicable requirements for certain categories of IVDs manufactured by a laboratory. The categories of enforcement discretion that are applicable to EsoGuard are summarized in the table below.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (43)
In
our December 31, 20242025 consolidated financial statements, we have concluded and stated our recurring losses from operations, recurring
cash flows used in operations and the requirement we raise additional capital in order to fund our ongoing operations beyond March 2026
2027 raise substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. Additionally, our independent registered public accounting
firm’s report on our consolidated financial statements includes an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about our ability
to continue as a going concern. Our plans to address this going concern risk include pursuing further financings in addition to the recently
completed offering of our Registered Direct Offering (in which we realized net proceeds of approximately $14.5 million) and pursuing
additional offerings of debt and/or equity securities. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from our inability to consummate such offerings or our ability to continue as a going concern. Moreover, there is no assurance
if we consummate additional offerings, we will raise sufficient proceeds in such offerings to pay our financial obligations as they become
due. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
In 2024, we issued shares of Series B Preferred Stock and Series B-1 Preferred Stock. In March 2026, the Company issued 29,270,685 shares of common stock to the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock, upon the conversion thereof (inclusive of the annual dividend payable thereon). As a result of the application of the beneficial ownership limitations in the Series B Certificate of Designations, 13,294,267 shares of common stock otherwise issuable upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock are held in abeyance until such time that they can be issued without exceeding any such limitations. We also anticipate that on or about May 6, 2026, the Company shall issue 16,823,762 shares of common stock to the holders of the Series B-1 Preferred Stock, upon the conversion thereof (inclusive of the annual dividend payable thereon, but subject to any applicable beneficial ownership limitations).
In 2024, we issued shares of
Series B Preferred Stock and Series B-1 Preferred Stock that, in accordance with the terms thereof, as of March 20, 2025 could be
converted into, in the aggregate, up to 62,332,498 shares of our common stock (which amount includes all future dividends that may
be potentially payable in shares of our common stock).
In August 2024, we entered into
an a ninth amendment to the management services agreementMSA with PAVmed (the “MSA”),PAVmed, pursuant to which PAVmed may elect to receive
payment of the monthly fee under the management services agreement in cash or in shares of our common stock valued at a price based on
the current market price, subject to a floor price and a maximum number of shares. Under the amendment, the monthly fee due from the
Company to PAVmed was increased from $0.83 million to $1.05 million.million In(the accordanceparties withalso entered in a tenth amendment to the MSA andin December 2025, to provide for a one-time increase in the PBERA,monthly fee by an additional $1.2 million, to cover certain one-time employee-related expenses paid by PAVmed on January 26, 2024, PAVmed
elected to receive payment of $4.675 million of fees and reimbursements accrued under the MSA and the PBERA through the issuance of 3,331,771
sharesbehalf of the Company’s common stock.Company). To the extent PAVmed elects for us to satisfy our obligations under the MSA and PBERA in
shares of our common stock in the future, the interest of other shareholders of the Company would be diluted. Currently, under the terms
of its outstanding convertible debt, PAVmed is required to elect to receive such payments in cash.
Furthermore, we have issued and
expect to continue to issue equity awards, including stock options, under our 2018 Long-Term Incentive Equity Plan (the “Lucid
Diagnostics Inc. 2018 Equity Plan”) and our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Lucid Diagnostics Inc. ESPP”). In addition,
inMay March2025, 2022,the weCompany entered into a committedControlled equityEquity facilityOffering with an affiliate of Cantor. Under the terms of the facility, Cantor has committed
to purchase up to $50 million in shares of our common shares stock from time to time at the our requestAgreement (althoughATM) thisbetween facilityus terminates
onand AugustMaxim 1,Group 2025, which is the first of the month following the 36-month anniversary of the effective date of the registration statement
for the same). In November 2022, we also entered into an “at-the-market offering”LLC for up to $6.5$25.0 million of our common stock
that may be offered and sold underfrom time to time (replacing a Controlledsimilar Equity Offering Agreement between us and Cantor (although effective as of March 4, 2025,
the Company terminated the prospectus supplement for this offering and as a result,facility the Company willhad notpreviously makemaintained anywith sales of common stock
in this offering unless and until a new prospectus or prospectus supplement is filedCantor). Also in November 2022, we entered into the PBERA
with PAVmed, pursuant to which PAVmed will continue to pay certain payroll and benefit-related expenses on our behalf and we will reimburse
PAVmed, in cash or, subject to approval by each of our boards of directors, in shares of our common stock valued at a price based on
the current market price, subject to a floor price and a maximum number of shares.
Our future capital
requirements depend on many factors, including our research, development, and sales and marketing activities. We intend to continue
to make investments to support our business growth. Because we have not generated significant revenue or cash flow to date, and
despite our recently having raised net proceeds of approximately $14.5 million in connection with our consummation in February 2025
of a registered direct offering, and $18.3 million in connection with the issuance in November 2024 of the 2024 Convertible Notes,
we may require additional funds to:
Under our existing management
services agreement and payroll and benefit expense reimbursement agreement with PAVmed, PAVmed may determine the form and timing of our
satisfaction of our obligations under such agreements. To the extent PAVmed elects for this obligation to be paid in cash (which it is
currently required to do under the terms of its convertible debt),cash, that would increase our need to raise additional capital. In this
regard, because of the challenges PAVmed has faced in terms of raising capital itself, PAVmed has become highly dependent on us to fund
its operations, primarily through electingelected for the payment in cash by us of our obligations under our management services agreement with
PAVmed. PAVmed as means for funding its operations.
Additional, still unproven, technologies
with the potential to compete with EsoGuard and EsoCheck in the future, include breath tests and oral tests which may be capable of identifying
the presence of BE. For example, there is early data to suggest that an “electric nose” device which measures volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) developed by The eNose Company, based in the Netherlands, may be able to identify patients with BE. Preliminary published
data from Columbia University School of Medicine found that differences in the oral bacterial microbiome, obtained with a simple saliva
sample or oral swab, may correlate with the presence of BE.
Our products may never achieve market acceptance.acceptance, despite our investment of significant time and resources to drive adoption.
Drive adoption of our products requires use to devote significant time and resources, and to make substantial capital investments, with no assurance of a positive outcome. This risk is exacerbated, given the lengthy sales cycle to convince a physician, payor or health system to use our products, which can take up to 12-18 months, or longer. As a result, it may take years to our investment in our commercial activities, if at all.
Long-term adoption of our products
as well as payment and coverage for them may depend on their recommendation in clinical practice guidelines. These include professional
society guidelines published by gastroenterology specialty societies, such as the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG),ACG, the American
Gastroenterological Association (AGA),AGA, and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy ("ASGE"), internal medicine and family practice
societies such as the American College of Physicians ("ACP") and American Academy of Family Physicians ("AAFP"), and oncology societies such
as the American Cancer Society ("ACS"). These also include federal agencies and federally funded affiliates such as the U.S. Preventative
Services Task Force (“USPSTF”) and the Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality (“AHRQ”). The recommendations
in these clinical practice guidelines may shape payors’ coverage decisions.
The USPSTF, a panel of primary
care physicians and epidemiologists and other national experts funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ AHRQ,
makes influential recommendations on clinical preventative services. We may seek a USPSTF recommendation in the future. The process of
USPSTF recommendation development is lengthy, requires high quality supporting evidence for a positive recommendation, and the outcome
of any USPSTF process is uncertain.
Initially,For the foreseeable future, we will not directly
manufacture our products and will rely on third parties to do so for us. If our manufacturing and distribution agreements are not satisfactory,
we may not be able to develop or commercialize products as planned. In addition, we may not be able to contract with third parties to
manufacture our products in an economical manner. Furthermore, third-party manufacturers may not adequately perform their obligations,
may delay clinical development or submission of products for regulatory approval or otherwise may impair our competitive position. We
may not be able to enter into or maintain relationships with manufacturers that comply with good manufacturing practices. If a product
manufacturer fails to comply with good manufacturing practices, we could experience significant time delays or we may be unable to commercialize
or continue to market the products. Changes in our manufacturers could require costly new product testing and facility compliance inspections.
In the United States, failure to comply with good manufacturing practices or other applicable legal requirements can lead to federal
seizure of violative products, injunctive actions brought by the federal government, and potential criminal and civil liability on the
part of a company and its officers and employees. Because of these and other factors, we may not be able to replace our manufacturing
capacity quickly or efficiently in the event that our manufacturers are unable to manufacture our products at one or more of their facilities.
As a result, the sales and marketing of our products could be delayed or we could be forced to develop our own manufacturing capacity,
which could require substantial additional funds and personnel and compliance with extensive regulations.
The manufacturing processes for our products have not yet been tested at large-scale commercial levels, and it may not be possible to manufacture or process these materials in a cost-effective manner.
Our ability to successfully carry
out our business plan is dependent upon the efforts of our key personnel. We cannot assure you that any of our key personnel will remain
with us for the immediate or foreseeable future. The unexpected loss of the services of our key personnel could have a detrimental effect
on us. We may also be unable to attract and retain additional key personnel in the future. We are limited in shares available for issuance
under our long-term incentive plan,evenplan, even taking into account the shareholder-approved annual increases, which could limit our ability
to attract and retain key personnel. An inability to attract and retain key personnel may impact our ability to continue and grow our
operations.
Despite our initiative to establish a robust cash-pay program, long-term successful commercialization of our EsoGuard test and EsoCheck device, and of any other product or service we develop, license or acquire depends, in large part, on the availability of adequate reimbursement from private or governmental third-party payors.
EsoGuard’s PLA code 0114U
has been granted “gapfill” determination through the CMS CLFS process, allowing us to engage directly with Medicare Administrative
Contractor (“MAC”) Palmetto GBA, whose Molecular Diagnostics Program (“MolDx”) performs technical assessment
of molecular diagnostic tests on behalf of itself and other MACs. Although CMS granted EsoGuard final Medicare payment determination
of $1,938.01, effective January 1, 2021, we have not received a final Medicare local coverage determination from MolDx. Most recently,
in May 2023, a final Local Coverage Determination (“LCD”) L39256, entitled “Molecular Testing for Detection of Upper
Gastrointestinal Metaplasia, Dysplasia, and Neoplasia” became effective on the CMS website by MAC Palmetto GBA. (A substantially
identical LCD was published by Noridian Healthcare Solutions, the MAC whose geographic jurisdiction covers our CLIA laboratory in Lake
Forest, CA.) The LCD outlines criteria for future coverage that MolDX expects upper gastrointestinal precancer and cancer molecular diagnostic
tests to meet. These criteria include active GERD with at least two risk factors, as well as evidence of analytic validity, clinical
validity, and clinical utility. Although the LCD indicated that it found that no currently existing test has fulfilled all these criteria,
it indicated that it will “monitor the evidence and may revise this determination based on the pertinent literature and society
recommendations.” In November 2024, we announced that we submitted to MolDx our complete clinical evidence package in support of
a request for reconsideration of the non-coverage language in the LCD to secure Medicare coverage for EsoGuard. However, there can be
no assurance that MolDx will determine that we meet the criteria for coverage as specified in the LCD. If we are not granted coverage,
or if a determination is substantially delayed, that could have a material adverse effect on our ability to commercialize EsoGuard.
In November 2024, we announced that we submitted to MolDx our complete clinical evidence package in support of a request for reconsideration of the non-coverage language in the LCD to secure Medicare coverage for EsoGuard. As part of the LCD reconsideration process, MolDx-participating Medicare Administrative Contractors convened a CAC Meeting regarding the LCD on September 4, 2025. At the meeting, eleven experts, including physicians across multiple specialties (GI, primary care, pathology), major society guideline co-authors (ACG, AGA) and industry leaders (American Foregut Society, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy), participated in this extensive discussion of the unmet clinical need with respect to early detection of esophageal precancer and the strength of the EsoGuard clinical validity and clinical utility data. However, there can be no assurance that MolDx will determine that we meet the criteria for coverage as specified in the LCD. If we are not granted coverage, or if a determination is substantially delayed, that could have a material adverse effect on our ability to commercialize EsoGuard.
FDA has proposed a policy under which it would
phase out its general enforcement discretion approach for LDTs so that IVDs manufactured at a laboratory would generally fall under the
same enforcement approach as other IVDs. While we are confident that the proposed policy will not have a material impact on our business,
there can be no assurance that will be the case.
On May 6, 2024, the FDA issued
a final rule aimed at helping to ensure the safety and effectiveness of LDTs. The rule amends the FDA’s regulations to make explicit
that IVDs are devices under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) including when the manufacturer of the IVD is a laboratory.
Along with this amendment, the FDA is finalizing a policy under which the FDA will provide greater oversight of IVDs offered as LDTs
through a phaseout of its general enforcement discretion approach for LDTs over the course of four years, as well as targeted enforcement
discretion policies for certain categories of IVDs manufactured by laboratories.
The phaseout policy contains
the following five stages:
The FDA also intends to exercise
enforcement discretion and generally not enforce some or all applicable requirements for certain categories of IVDs manufactured by a
laboratory. The categories of enforcement discretion that are applicable to EsoGuard are summarized in the table below.
As EsoGuard was marketed
prior to rule publication and is also NYS CLEP approved, hence, enforcement discretion is applicable for compliance with Stages 4
and 5. We will be implementing compliance with MDR requirements, correction and removal reporting requirements, and quality system
(QS) requirements regarding complaint files by March 31, 2025, well before the deadline of May 6, 2025. Gap analysis has been
completed and we are expecting our compliance activities to be completed for Stages 2 and 3 before the FDA’s expected timeframes in 2026 and 2027, respectively. We are confident that the proposed
final rule will not have a commercial impact as the Company already has a robust QS management platform for medical devices and
EsoGuard will be able to easily transition to the platform to fulfill the QS requirements, as required by the FDA. However, there
can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully transition the platform to fulfill the QS requirements, as required by FDA,
and our failure to do so could have a material impact on our ability to commercialize EsoGuard and on our business as a whole.
We have currently hold the certificates, licenses, and accreditations required to perform our clinical laboratory testing. Clinical laboratories are subject to periodic inspection by federal and state regulators and accrediting bodies, and may be subject to sanctions for noncompliance. and to sanctions for failing to comply with applicable requirements. Sanctions available under CLIA and applicable certain state laws include suspending, limiting, or revoking certificates or licenses; prohibiting a laboratory from running tests; requiring a laboratory to implement a corrective action plan; and imposing civil monetary penalties; and, in certain cases, exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs. Failure to comply with any applicable requirements of CLIA or state laboratory requirements could result in enforcement action, interruption of our laboratory operations, and increased cost. It also could adversely affect the commercialization of our products and service or future regulatory determinations by CMS or other governmental authorities, or otherwise negatively impact our business.
We perform the EsoGuard test
in our own CLIA-certified commercial clinical laboratory, and like all clinical laboratories which perform non-research laboratory testing
on human samples in the U.S., it is regulated by CMS through CLIA and associated federal regulations set forth in 42 CFR § 493,
as well as through other federal and state laws and regulations. Federal CLIA requirements and laws of certain states impose certification
requirements for clinical laboratories, establish standards for quality assurance and quality control, among other things. Some state
laws restrict laboratory marketing activities, which may adversely affect our ability to market our laboratory services. Clinical laboratories
are subject to inspection by regulators, and to sanctions for failing to comply with applicable requirements. Sanctions available under
CLIA include prohibiting a laboratory from running tests, requiring a laboratory to implement a corrective plan, and imposing civil monetary
penalties. If we fail to maintain CLIA-certification or otherwise meet the applicable requirements of federal or state law, that failure
could adversely limit or prevent its ability to perform our EsoGuard test, or any other diagnostic tests which we may develop, license
or acquire, affect any payor consideration of such tests, prevent their clearance or approval entirely, and/or interrupt the commercial
sale and/or marketing of any such tests, cause us to incur significant expense to remedy this failure and otherwise negatively impact
our business.
In addition, we and our cleared
or approved products will be subject to extensive and ongoing regulatory requirements by FDA and other regulatory authorities with regard
to the labeling, packaging, adverse event reporting, storage, advertising, promotion and recordkeeping for our products. We and our contract
manufacturers also will be required to comply with current good manufacturing practice (“cGMP”) regulations regarding the
manufacture of our products, which include requirements related to quality control and quality assurance as well as the corresponding
maintenance of records and documentation. Further, regulatory authorities must approve these manufacturing facilities before they can
be used to manufacture medical devices, and these facilities are subject to continual review and periodic inspections by FDA and other
regulatory authorities for compliance with cGMP regulations. Operations at these facilities could be interrupted or halted if FDA or
other governmental agency deems the findings of such inspections unsatisfactory.
If FDA determines that our labeling,
advertising, promotional materials, or user training materials, or representations made by our personnel, include the promotion of an
off-label use for the device, or that we have made false or misleading or inadequately substantiated promotional claims, or claims that
could potentially change the regulatory status of the product, the agency could take the position that these materials have misbranded
our devices and request that we modify our labeling, advertising, or user training or promotional materials and/or subject us to regulatory
or legal enforcement actions, including the issuance of an Untitled Letter or a Warning Letter, injunction, seizure, recall, adverse
publicity, civil penalties, criminal penalties, or other adverse actions. It is also possible that other federal, state, or foreign enforcement
authorities might take action if they consider our labeling, advertising, promotional, or user training materials to constitute promotion
of an unapproved use, which could result in significant fines, penalties, or other adverse actions under other statutory authorities,
such as laws prohibiting false claims for reimbursement. In that event, we would be subject to extensive fines and penalties and our
reputation could be damaged and adoption of the products would be impaired. Although we intend to refrain from statements that could
be considered off-label promotion of our products, FDA or another regulatory agency could disagree and conclude that we have engaged
in off-label promotion. In addition, any such off-label use of our products may increase the risk of injury to patients, and, in turn,
the risk of product liability claims, and such claims are expensive to defend and could divert our management’s attention and result
in substantial damage awards against us.
Many aspects of our business, beyond the specific elements described above, are subject to complex, intertwined, costly and/or burdensome federal and state health care laws and regulations which may open to interpretation and be subject to varying levels of discretionary enforcement. If we fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we could face substantial penalties and our business, operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Even though we do not and do
not expect to control referrals of healthcare services or bill directly to Medicare, Medicaid or other third-party payors, certain federal
and state healthcare laws and regulationsregulations, including those pertaining to fraud and abuse and patients’ rightsrights, are and will be applicable to our
business. We could be subject to healthcare fraud and abuse and patient privacy regulation by both the federal government and the states
in which we conduct our business. The regulations that may affect our ability to operate include, without limitation:
Billing for diagnostic and laboratory services is a complex process. Laboratories bill many different payors including patients, private insurance companies, Medicare, Medicaid, concierge medicine practices and employer groups, all of which have different billing requirements. We are continuing to work with third-party payors to cover and reimburse EsoGuard tests. If we are unsuccessful, we may not receive payment for EsoGuard tests we perform for patients on a timely basis, if at all, and we may not be able to provide services for patients with certain healthcare plans. We may face lawsuits by government or commercial payors if they believe they have overpaid us for our EsoGuard test services. Commercial payors may also audit our claims submitted to them, which audits could be costly and time-consuming, and may result in our having to return to payors any amounts they determined should not have been reimbursed. We may face write-offs of doubtful accounts, disputes with payors and patients, and long collection cycles. We may face patient dissatisfaction, complaints or lawsuits, including to the extent EsoGuard tests are not fully covered by insurers and patients become responsible for all or part of the price of the test. As a result, patient compliance in fulfilling prescriptions for EsoGuard could be adversely affected. To the extent patients express dissatisfaction with our billing practices to their physicians, those physicians may be less likely to prescribe EsoGuard for other patients, and our business would be adversely affected. Likewise, any such dissatisfaction expressed by the businesses or organization with whom we partner for our testing events could result in reputational harm within the communities in which we operate.
Further, changes in regulatory
requirements and guidance may occur, both in the United States and in foreign countries, and we may need to amend clinical study protocols
to reflect these changes. Amendments may require us to resubmit our clinical study protocols to an IRB for reexamination, which may impact
the costs, timing or successful completion of a clinical study. In light of widely publicized events concerning the safety risk of certain
drug and medical device products, regulatory authorities, members of Congress, the Governmental Accounting Office, medical professionals
and the general public have all raised concerns about potential safety issues. These events have resulted in the recall and withdrawal
of medical device products, revisions to product labeling that further limit use of products and establishment of risk management programs
that may, for instance, restrict distribution of certain products or require safety surveillance or patient education. The increased
attention to safety issues may result in a more cautious approach by FDA or other regulatory authorities to clinical studies and the
medical device approval process. Adverse event data from clinical studies may receive greater scrutiny with respect to product safety,
which may make FDA or other regulatory authorities more likely to terminate or suspend clinical studies before completion, or require
longer or additional clinical studies that may result in substantial additional expense and a delay or failure in obtaining approval
or approval for a more limited indication than originally sought.
PAVmed owns approximately 46%
27.5% as of December 31, 20242025 and 35%27.1% as of March 20,23, 20252026 of our issued common stock (with such percentage inclusive of shares
of our common stock underlying granted but unvested restricted stock awards), but excluding the voting power of any convertible securities.
Presently, Although presently PAVmed controls less than 50% of the combined voting power of our common stock and our convertible securities andsecurities, for
as long as PAVmed is our largest shareholder, PAVmed will have significant influence in the election of all the members of our board
of directors. In addition, as long as PAVmed continues to control more of our voting securities than any of our other shareholders, PAVmed
will also have significant influence over any other action that requires shareholder approval. If PAVmed does not provide any requisite
consent allowing us to take any such action when requested, we may not be able to engage in the related activities if we do not get the
required consent from our other shareholders and, as a result, our business and our operating results may be harmed.
As a result of the exercise by the holder of PAVmed’s convertible debt and preferred stock of its rights under the agreements
governing thosethat instruments,instrument, such holder could acquire voting control of the Company.
PAVmed currently has approximately
$6.6 $15.0 million convertibleof debt outstanding, which matures in DecemberFebruary 2025, and has from time to time been in default of the financial covenants thereunder, although PAVmed has received a waiver of those financial covenants through December 31, 2025.2029. While the holder of such indebtedness
has agreed in the past to waive any suchnon-compliance non-compliance,with the terms of other debt it has held, there can be no assurance that it will do so in the future. If the debtholder elects to accelerate
PAVmed’s indebtedness rather than waiving any such non-compliance, it is likely PAVmed will not have sufficient cash on hand to
pay the amounts due on an acceleration, in which case it may be required to satisfy its obligations through the transfer of its shares
of common stock of the Company to such debtholder.
Under the terms of PAVmed’s
convertible debt, so long as any shares of PAVmed’s Series C Preferred Stock remain outstanding, the holder of such debt will be
entitled to exchange all, or any portion, of the remaining debt (including any interest that would accrue thereon through the maturity
date thereof) into shares of our common stock, at an exchange price per share of our common stock equal to $0.85 per share, subject to
certain beneficial ownership limitations. Neither we nor PAVmed have any control over if or when the holder will exercise this right.
In
addition, under the terms of PAVmed’s Series C Preferred Stock, the holder may elect to convert such shares of preferred stock
into common stock of PAVmed at a fixed conversion price $1.068 per share of PAVmed common stock (or, under certain circumstance, at a
lower conversion price). If the holder of the Series C Preferred Stock converted such equity interest in full into shares of PAVmed common
stock at the fixed conversion price, such holder would likely acquire control of PAVmed (and accordingly, its interest in us).
In any such event, the applicable
holder in turn would be entitled to exercise the voting control with respect to any shares of our common stock that it acquires from,
or controls through, PAVmed and may do so in a manner that could vary significantly from that of PAVmed.
We cannot assure you that
such services are not available at lower cost from third parties. Any payments made to PAVmed will reduce our cash flow and profits. Currently,In under our MSA,2025, the annual fees payablepaid to PAVmed areunder $12.6the MSA were $13.8 million.
Our common stock is listed
on the Nasdaq Capital Market. We are required to meet certain financial and liquidity criteria to maintain the listing of our common
stock on Nasdaq (and we while we are currently in compliance with such requirements, from time to time we have failed otto comply with
the Nasdaq’s minimum bid price requirement). If we violate the Nasdaq continued listing requirements or fail to meet any of Nasdaq’s continued listing
standards, our common stock may be delisted. In addition, while we have no present intention to do so, our Board of Directors may
determine that the cost of maintaining our listing on a national securities exchange outweighs the benefits of such listing.
We
are obligated to pay dividends in shares of our common stock to the holders of shares of our Series BB-1 Preferred Stock and Series B-1
Preferred Stock, which stock dividendsdividend will dilute our existing shareholders.
Each
holder of our Series B Preferred Stock and Series B-1 Preferred Stock is entitled to receive, on the one-year and two-year anniversaries
anniversary of the issuance thereof, a dividend payable in shares of our common stock equal to 20% of the number of shares of common stock issuable
upon conversion of the shares of preferred stock it then holds. Such stock dividendsdividend would be accelerated upon a mandatory conversion
of our preferred stock in connection with certain change of control transactions. Such dividendsdividend will dilute the holdings of our existing
stockholders.
As a public company, we will
incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we would not incur as a private company. We will be subject to the reporting
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the other rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
or “SEC,” and the rules and regulations of Nasdaq. The expenses that will be required in order to adequately prepare for
being a public company will be material, and compliance with the various reporting and other requirements applicable to public companies
will require considerable time and attention of management. For example, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the rules of the SEC and national
securities exchanges have imposed various requirements on public companies, including requiring establishment and maintenance of effective
disclosure and financial controls. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance
initiatives. These rules and regulations will continue to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities
more time-consuming and costly, and could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified personnel to serve on our
Board of Directors, our board committees, or as executive officers.
We are an “emerging growth
company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, or the JOBS Act, which was enacted in April 2012. For as long
as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we may take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable
to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation
requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive
compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote
on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We could be an emerging
growth company for up to five years, although circumstances could cause us to lose that status earlier. We will remain an emerging growth
company until the earlier of (1) the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the completion of our initial public
offering, offering (i.e., December 31, 2026), (2) the last day of the fiscal year in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.07 billion, (3) the date on
which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates
exceeds $700.0 million as of the prior June 30th, and (4) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible
debt securities during the prior three-year period. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because
we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading
market for our common stock and our stock price may suffer or be more volatile.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Department of Veteran Affairs”
New heading “Real-World Experience Data”
New heading “Board Appointment”
New heading “Russell 2000® and 3000® Indexes”
New heading “Hoag Comprehensive Esophageal Precancer Testing Program Using EsoGuard”
New heading “The year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to year ended December 31, 2024”
New heading “The year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to year ended December 31, 2024 - continued”
New heading “March 2025 Registered Direct Offering”
New heading “April 2025 Confidentially Marketed Public Offering”
New heading “Recent Accounting Standards”
Removed heading “CWRU NIH Grant Related to EsoGuard and EsoCheck”
Removed heading “Appointment of Dennis Matheis to Board of Directors”
Removed heading “Lucid IP Matters”
Removed heading “Intercompany Agreements with PAVmed”
Removed heading “Appointment of Dennis Matheis to Board of Directors”
Removed heading “Registered Direct Offering”
Removed heading “Debt Refinancing”
Removed heading “The year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to year ended December 31, 2023 - continued”
Removed heading “Loss on Issue and Offering Costs - Senior Secured Convertible Note”
Removed heading “Private Placement - Securities Purchase Agreement”
Removed heading “Registered Direct Offering”
Removed heading “Committed Equity Facility and ATM Facility”
Largest changes
“The year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to year ended December 31, 2023 - continued”see in full comparison
“The year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to year ended December 31, 2024 - continued”see in full comparison
“The year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to year ended December 31, 2024”see in full comparison
“Hoag Comprehensive Esophageal Precancer Testing Program Using EsoGuard”see in full comparison
“Loss on Issue and Offering Costs - Senior Secured Convertible Note”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (95)
WeLucid areDiagnostics is a commercial-stage,commercial-stage cancer
prevention medical diagnostics technology companycompany. Lucid is focused on the millions of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (“GERD”), also known as chronic heartburn, who are at risk of developing esophageal precancer
and cancer, specifically highly lethal esophageal adenocarcinoma (“EAC”).
We believe that our flagship
product, the EsoGuard Esophageal DNA Test, performed on samples collected with the EsoCheck Esophageal Cell Collection Device, constitutes
the first and only commercially available diagnostic test capable of serving as a widespread testing tool forwith the early detectiongoal of esophageal
precancer,preventing includingEAC Barrett’sdeaths, Esophagusthrough (“BE”), in at-risk patients. Earlyearly detection of esophageal precancer allows
patients to undergo appropriate monitoring and treatment, as indicated by clinical practice guidelines, in anat-risk effortGERD to prevent progression
to esophageal cancer.patients.
EsoGuard is a bisulfite-converted targeted next-generation sequencing ("NGS") DNA assay performed on surface esophageal cells collected with the FDA 510(k)-cleared EsoCheck device. It quantifies methylation at 31 sites on two genes, Vimentin ("VIM") and Cyclin A1 ("CCNA1"). Analytical validation tests of EsoGuard demonstrated approximately 97% analytical sensitivity, 95% analytical specificity, 98% analytical accuracy, and 100% inter-assay and intra-assay precision. Performance characteristics of the EsoGuard test have been evaluated in two case-control studies and two prospective, single-arm cohort studies. Both cohort studies were designed as “screening” studies, enrolling patients from the intended-use population. In these screening settings, EsoGuard demonstrated a positive predictive value ("PPV") of 30–33% and a negative predictive value ("NPV") of 99% for the detection of Barrett’s esophagus (“BE”) and EAC.
EsoGuard
is a bisulfite-converted targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) DNA assay performed on surface esophageal cells collected with EsoCheck.
It quantifies methylation at 31 sites on two genes, Vimentin (VIM) and Cyclin A1 (CCNA1). The assay has been evaluated in multiple studies,
demonstrating sensitivity of ~90% for detecting disease along the full esophageal precancer to cancer spectrum, with a negative predictive
value (NPV) of ~99%. Sensitivity and NPV remain very high even for detecting early precancer, which is unprecedented for a molecular
diagnostic test.
EsoCheck is an FDA 510(k) cleared and
CE Mark clearedcertified noninvasive swallowable balloon capsule catheter device capabledesigned for in-office targeted sampling of sampling surface esophageal cells in a less than five-minute
two minute long office procedure. It consists of a vitamin pill-sizedsized rigidsemi-rigid plastic capsule tethered to a thin silicone catheter from which a soft inflatable silicone
balloon with textured ridges emerges to gently swab surface esophageal cells. When vacuum suction is applied, the balloon and sampled
cells are pulled into the capsule, protecting them from contamination and dilution by cells outside of the targeted region during device
withdrawal. We believe this proprietary Collect+Protect™ technology makes EsoCheck the only noninvasive esophageal cell collection
device capable of such anatomically targeted and protected sampling.
EsoGuard and EsoCheck are based
on patented technology licensed by Lucid from Case Western Reserve University (“CWRU”). EsoGuard and EsoCheck have been developed
to provide an accurate, non-invasive, patient-friendly testtesting for the early detection of EAC and BE, including dysplastic BE and related
precursors pre-cursors to EAC in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (“GERD”), commonly known as chronic heartburn, acid reflux,
or just reflux.GERD.
In November 2024, we submitted
to MolDx our complete clinical evidence package in support of a request for reconsideration of the non-coverage language in the LCDLCD, to
secure Medicare coverage for EsoGuard. The EsoGuard clinical evidence package included six new peer-reviewed publications: three clinical
validation studies (two in the intended use population, one case control), two clinical utility studies, and one analytical validation
study. The current LCD provides clear coverage criteria consistent with the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG)ACG, guidelines for
esophageal precancer testing. The package was submitted as part of a request for reconsideration of the non-coverage language in the
LCD to secure Medicare coverage for EsoGuard.
As part of the LCD reconsideration process, MolDx-participating Medicare Administrative Contractors convened a CAC, Meeting regarding the LCD on September 4, 2025. At the meeting, eleven experts, including physicians across multiple specialties (GI, primary care, pathology), major society guideline co-authors (ACG, AGA) and industry leaders (American Foregut Society, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy), participated in this extensive discussion of the unmet clinical need with respect to early detection of esophageal precancer and the strength of the EsoGuard clinical validity and clinical utility data.
Department of Veteran Affairs
On January 21, 2026, the Company announced that it has been awarded a contract by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs for its EsoGuard® Esophageal DNA Test, expanding access to esophageal precancer testing across the nation's largest integrated healthcare system, which serves more than nine million enrolled veterans annually.
In
March 2025, we announced that a recent update to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in
Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) focused on Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers (Version 1.2025) has added a new section on
BE screening. The NCCN Guidelines® now reference professional society guidelines on BE screening, including the most recent ACG clinical
guideline discussed above, which recommends non-endoscopic biomarker testing, such as EsoGuard performed on samples collected with EsoCheck,
as an acceptable alternative to invasive upper endoscopy to detect esophageal precancer.
On
March 18, 2025, the Company announced that its ENVET-BE clinical utility study has been accepted for publication in Gastroenterology
& Hepatology—the fifth peer-reviewed publication of clinical utility data for Lucid’s EsoGuard® Esophageal DNA Test, and
the second to present findings from a real-world screening population. The manuscript, entitled “Enhancing the Diagnostic Yield
of EGD for Diagnosis of Barrett’s Esophagus Through Methylated DNA Biomarker Triage,” demonstrates that confirmatory upper endoscopy
(EGD) performed in EsoGuard-positive patients had a substantially higher diagnostic yield for detecting esophageal precancer (Barrett’s
Esophagus or BE) than the expected yield of screening EGD alone in at-risk patients. The ENVET-BE study reviewed real-world data from
a cohort of 199 EsoGuard-positive patients who completed confirmatory EGD. The overall positive diagnostic yield for BE was 2.4-fold
higher than the expected yield of screening EGD alone, based on disease prevalence within an at-risk population. The yield was nearly
three-fold higher in patients meeting American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) screening criteria.
On November 7, 2024, the Company
announced that its manuscript for its multi-center ESOGUARD BE-1 study has been accepted for publication in The American Journal of Gastroenterology,
the official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG). This is the fourth publication presenting clinical validation
data for the Company’s EsoGuard® Esophageal DNA Test, and the second to demonstrate its performance in an intended-use screening
population. Consistent with previous studies, EsoGuard showed high sensitivity and negative predictive value in detecting esophageal precancer
(Barrett’s Esophagus or BE). The prospective, multi-center study presented data from a cohort of patients who met ACG guideline criteria
for esophageal precancer screening and underwent non-endoscopic EsoGuard testing followed by traditional upper endoscopy. EsoGuard sensitivity
and negative predictive value for detecting BE were approximately 88% and 99%, respectively. Specificity and positive predictive value
were approximately 81% and 30%, respectively. No serious adverse events were reported.
Real-World Experience Data
In December 2025, the Company announced results from an 18-month real-world experience evaluating the EsoGuard and EsoCheck in approximately 12,000 patients. The analysis demonstrated high technical success rates, rapid procedure times, and appropriate physician utilization in routine clinical practice, consistent with previously reported clinical studies. The data are currently under peer review for publication.
Board Appointment
Effective September 22, 2025, the board of directors of the Company appointed John R. Palumbo as a Class B director of the Company. Mr. Palumbo was designated for appointment by certain of the holders of 2024 Convertible Notes.
In September 2025, a case series published in Gastroenterology & Hepatology highlighted four real-world cases in which EsoGuard facilitated the timely detection of either high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or intramucosal carcinoma (IMC; T1a esophageal adenocarcinoma). In all four cases, the patients had no prior history of EGD, including one individual who had previously declined multiple EGD referrals. Following positive in-office EsoGuard results, each patient proceeded with endoscopic evaluation, which led to successful identification and eradication of disease in all cases. This case series underscores both the clinical utility of EsoGuard in detecting early-stage neoplasia and the ease with which the test can be integrated into standard office workflows to enhance screening uptake and early disease detection.
Russell 2000® and 3000® Indexes
On June 27, 2025, the Company was added to the Russell 2000® Index and the Russell 3000® Index, following the 2025 annual reconstitution by FTSE Russell.
Hoag Comprehensive Esophageal Precancer Testing Program Using EsoGuard
On June 18, 2025, the Company announced that Hoag, a nationally recognized regional healthcare delivery network, launched a comprehensive, integrated esophageal precancer testing program using the Company’s EsoGuard® Esophageal DNA Test. The Company will partner with Hoag to offer EsoGuard testing across its digestive health, primary care, and concierge medicine programs.
In March 2025, we announced that a recent update to the NCCN Guidelines® focused on Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers (Version 1.2025) has added a new section on BE screening. The NCCN Guidelines® now reference professional society guidelines on BE screening, including the most recent ACG clinical guideline discussed above, which recommends non-endoscopic biomarker testing, such as EsoGuard performed on samples collected with EsoCheck, as an acceptable alternative to invasive upper endoscopy to detect esophageal precancer.
On March 13, 2025, the Company announced
that Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield, an independent licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, has issued a positive coverage
policy for non-invasive screening of esophageal precancer and cancer in New York state. The new policypolicy, willwhich coverbecame effective as of May 26, 2025, covers EsoGuard in patients
who meet established criteria for esophageal precancer testing consistent with professional society guidelines.
CWRU NIH Grant Related to EsoGuard and EsoCheck
On February 27, 2025, the Company
announced that principal investigators from Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) and University Hospitals (UH), were awarded an $8 million
National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01 grant to conduct a five-year clinical study designed to evaluate esophageal precancer detection
using EsoCheck and EsoGuard among at-risk individuals without symptoms of chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The study, “A
Clinical Trial of Cancer Prevention by Biomarker Based Detections of Barrett’s Esophagus and Its Progression,” aims to evaluate
the effectiveness of EsoCheck and EsoGuard in detecting esophageal precancer (Barrett’s Esophagus or BE) to prevent esophageal cancer
(EAC) within a non-GERD at-risk population. To accomplish this aim, 800 patients without GERD symptoms who meet the American Gastroenterological
Association’s (AGA) risk criteria for screening will be recruited across five participating research centers: University Hospitals, University
of Colorado, Johns Hopkins University, University of North Carolina, and Cleveland Clinic.
IP Matters
On October 15, 2024, the Company
announced that it received a Notice of Allowance from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for a patent application covering
its proprietary method of using methylation of the cyclin-A1 (CCNA1) gene to help detect esophageal precancer and cancer, a key component
of its EsoGuard® Esophageal DNA Test.
EsoGuard utilizes next-generation
sequencing (NGS) to assess DNA methylation at 31 sites on two genes, vimentin (VIM) and cyclin-A1 (CCNA1). Such methylation has been shown
to be strongly associated with conditions along the spectrum from early esophageal precancer (non-dysplastic Barrett’s Esophagus or BE),
to late precancer (dysplastic BE), to cancer (esophageal adenocarcinoma). Although VIM methylation had been previously associated with
gastrointestinal neoplasias, the association of CCNA1 methylation with esophageal neoplasia is novel and appears to be more specific.
Appointment of Dennis Matheis to Board of Directors
On May 6, 2024, the board of directors
of the Company appointed Dennis Matheis as a Class C director of the Company (and he was subsequently re-elected to the board, together
with the incumbent Class C directors of the Company, at the Company’s annual shareholders meeting held on July 23, 2024).
Lucid IP Matters
On October 15, 2024, the Company
announced that it received a Notice of Allowance from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for a patent application
covering its proprietary method of using methylation of the cyclin-A1 (CCNA1) gene to help detect esophageal precancer and cancer, a
key component of its EsoGuard® Esophageal DNA Test.
EsoGuard utilizes next-generation
sequencing (NGS) to assess DNA methylation at 31 sites on two genes, vimentin (VIM) and cyclin-A1 (CCNA1). Such methylation has been
shown to be strongly associated with conditions along the spectrum from early esophageal precancer (non-dysplastic Barrett’s Esophagus
or BE), to late precancer (dysplastic BE), to cancer (esophageal adenocarcinoma). Although VIM methylation had been previously associated
with gastrointestinal neoplasias, the association of CCNA1 methylation with esophageal neoplasia is novel and appears to be more specific.
Intercompany Agreements with PAVmed
On August 6, 2024, PAVmed and the
Company entered into a ninth amendment to the management services agreement between PAVmed and Lucid (“MSA”) to increase the
monthly fee thereunder from $0.83 million per month to $1.05 million per month, effective as of July 1, 2024. In addition, under the terms
of PAVmed’s convertible debt, PAVmed is required to elect that these payments be made in cash.
Appointment of Dennis Matheis to Board of
Directors
On May 6, 2024, the board of directors
of the Company appointed Dennis Matheis as a Class C director of the Company (and Mr. Matheis was subsequently re-elected to the board,
together with the incumbent Class C directors of the Company, at the Company’s annual shareholders meeting held on July 23, 2024).
Registered Direct Offering
On March 5, 2025, the Company closed
on the sale of 13,939,331 shares of its common stock at a price of $1.10 per share (the “Offering”).
On September 11, 2025, the Company closed on the September 2025 Offering. The net proceeds of the September 2025 Offering,
after deducting the estimated placement agent’s fees and other expenses of the$1.8 Offering,million, was approximately $14.5$27.0 million. The Company
intends to use the net proceeds from the September 2025 Offering for working capital and other general corporate purposes.
Suspension of ATM Facility
On May 30, 2025, the Company entered into an ATM for up to $25.0 million of its common stock that may be offered and sold under a Controlled Equity Offering Agreement between the Company and Maxim Group LLC.
In November 2022, the Company
entered into a Controlled Equity Offering℠ Sales Agreement (the “Sales Agreement”) with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.
(“Cantor”). Pursuant to the Sales Agreement, from time to time, the Company may offer and sell shares of its common stock
to or through Cantor, acting as sales agent or principal. Sales of the Company’s common stock by Cantor, if any, under the Sales
Agreement may be made by any method permitted by law and deemed to be an “at the market offering” as defined in Rule 415(a)(4)
promulgated under the Securities Act (the “ATM Offering”). The Company filed a prospectus supplement dated December 6, 2022
(the “ATM Prospectus Supplement”), for the offer and sale of shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering price
of up to $6,500,000 in the ATM Offering.
Effective as of March 4, 2025, the Company terminated
the ATM Prospectus Supplement. The Company will not make any sales of common stock in the ATM Offering unless and until a new prospectus
or prospectus supplement is filed.
Other than the termination of the Prospectus Supplement,
the Sales Agreement remains in full force and effect.
Debt Refinancing
On November 22, 2024, the Company
closed on the sale of $21.975 million in principal amount of 12.0% Senior Secured Convertible Notes due 2029 (collectively, the “2024
Convertible Notes”), in a private placement, to certain accredited investors (the “2024 Note Investors”). The sale
of the 2024 Convertible Notes was completed pursuant to the terms of that certain Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of November
12, 2024 (the “2024 SPA”), between the Company and the 2024 Note Investors. The Company realized gross proceeds of $21.975
million and, after giving effect to the repayment in full of the March 2023 Senior Convertible Note, net proceeds of $18.3 million from
the sale of the 2024 Convertible Notes.
The Company used a portion of
the proceeds from the sale of the 2024 Convertible Notes to redeem the March 2023 Senior Convertible Note, by paying the contractual
redemption price of approximately $3.6 million.
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of professional fees for accounting, tax, audit and legal services (including those fees incurred as a result of our being a public company), consulting fees, employees costs involved in third-party payor reimbursement, expenses associated with obtaining and maintaining patents within our intellectual property portfolio, and certain employee costs, along with the portion of the MSA Fee allocated to general and administrative expenses.
The year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to year ended December 31, 2024
In the year ended December 31, 2025, revenue was $4.7 million as compared to $4.3 million for the corresponding period in the prior year. The $0.4 million increase principally relates to the increase in the consideration received for the performance of the EsoGuard Esophageal DNA tests.
In the year ended December 31, 2025, the cost of revenue was approximately $6.7 million as compared to $7.1 million for the corresponding period in the prior year. The $0.4 million decrease was principally related to:
In the year ended December 31, 2025, sales and marketing costs were approximately $17.7 million as compared to $16.5 million for the corresponding period in the prior year. The net increase of $1.2 million was principally related to:
In the year ended December 31, 2025, general and administrative costs were approximately $23.9 million as compared to $20.2 million for the corresponding period in the prior year. The net increase of $3.7 million was principally related to:
The year ended December 31, 20242025 as
compared to year ended December 31, 20232024 - continued
In the year ended December 31,
2024, revenue was $4.3 million as compared to $2.4 million for the corresponding period in the prior year. The $1.9 million increase
principally relates to the revenue for our EsoGuard Esophageal DNA Test performed in our CLIA laboratory for the period and the consideration
received for the performance of the EsoGuard Esophageal DNA Test.
In the year ended December 31,
2024, the cost of revenue was approximately $7.1 million as compared to $6.0 million for the corresponding period in the prior year.
The $1.1 million increase was principally related to:
In the year ended December 31,
2024, sales and marketing costs were approximately $16.5 million as compared to $16.4 million for the corresponding period in the prior
year. The net increase of $0.1 million was principally related to:
In the year ended December 31,
2024, general and administrative costs were approximately $20.2 million as compared to $19.3 million for the corresponding period in
the prior year. The net increase of $0.9 million was principally related to:
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
We could not find a separate Risk Factors item in the latest 10-Q. Some companies leave it out of quarterly reports; see the annual 10-K risk factors and the original filing. Open the filing on SEC.gov.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Laboratory Benefit Manager Coverage Policy”
New heading “The six months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025”
New heading “Sales and marketing expenses”
New heading “General and administrative expenses”
New heading “Research and development expenses”
New heading “Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets”
New heading “Other Income and Expense”
New heading “Change in fair value of convertible debt”
Removed heading “Real-World Experience Data”
Removed heading “Cost of revenue”
Removed heading “Cost of revenue”
Largest changes
“On May 13, 2026, the Company and a majority-in-interest of the holders of the 2024 Convertible Notes entered into a waiver agreement, pursuant to which they agreed that the holders would not declare that an event of default has occurred due to the Company's failure to obtain a positive Medicare decision with respect to its EsoGuard product by May 22, 2026. Such waiver covers the period through August 22, 2026. See Note 10, Debt, for more information.”see in full comparison
“The six months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (45)
In November 2024, we submitted to MolDx our complete clinical evidence package in support of a request for reconsideration of the non-coverage language in the local coverage determination, or (“LCD,LCD”) to secure Medicare coverage for EsoGuard. The EsoGuard clinical evidence package included six new peer-reviewed publications: three clinical validation studies (two in the intended use population, one case control), two clinical utility studies, and one analytical validation study. The current LCD provides clear coverage criteria consistent with the American College of Gastroenterology, or (“ACG,ACG”) guidelines for esophageal precancer testing. The package was submitted as part of a request for reconsideration of the non-coverage language in the LCD to secure Medicare coverage for EsoGuard.
As part of the LCD reconsideration process, MolDx-participating Medicare Administrative Contractors convened a Contractor Advisory Committee, or (“CAC,CAC”) Meeting regarding the LCD on September 4, 2025. At the meeting, eleven experts, including physicians across multiple specialties (GI, primary care, pathology), major society guideline co-authors (ACG,American AGACollege (asof definedGastroenterology, below)American Gastroenterological Association) and industry leaders (American Foregut Society, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy), participated in this extensive discussion of the unmet clinical need with respect to early detection of esophageal precancer and the strength of the EsoGuard clinical validity and clinical utility data.
Laboratory Benefit Manager Coverage Policy
In July 2026, the Company secured its first positive coverage policy from a laboratory benefit manager that establishes genetic and molecular testing coverage policies for adoption by its client health plans. The policy considers EsoGuard medically necessary for patients who meet American College of Gastroenterology screening criteria.
Subsequent to March 31, 2026, onOn April 24, 2026, the Company closed on the sale of 18,000,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $1.00 per share in a registered direct offering. The net proceeds of the offering, after deducting approximately $1.2 million of the underwriting discount and other estimated expenses, was approximately $16.8 million.
Real-World Experience Data
In December 2025, the Company announced results from an 18-month real-world experience evaluating EsoGuard and EsoCheck in approximately 12,000 patients. The analysis demonstrated high technical success rates, rapid procedure times, and appropriate physician utilization in routine clinical practice, consistent with previously reported clinical studies. The data are currently under peer review for publication.
On May 30, 2025, the Company entered into an “at-the-market offering” (“ATM”) for up to $25.0 million of its common stock that may be offered and sold under a Controlled Equity Offering Agreement between the Company and Maxim Group LLC. In the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company sold 4,161,747 shares through theirthe ATM equity facility for net proceeds of approximately $5.3 million, after payment of 3% commissions,commissions or approximately $0.2 million.
Revenue
Cost of revenue
Results of Operations - continued
Other income and expense, net, consists principally of changes in fair value of our convertible notenotes and losses on extinguishment of debt upon repayment of such convertible note.notes.
All dollar amounts in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are presented as dollars in millions, except for share and per share amounts.
Results of Operations - continued
The three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026 as compared to the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2025
Revenue
In the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, revenue was approximately $1.3$1.5 million as compared to $0.8$1.2 million for the corresponding period in the prior year. The $0.5$0.3 million increase principally relates to the increase in consideration received for the performance of the EsoGuard tests.
Cost of revenue
In the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the cost of revenue was relatively level at approximately $1.6$1.4 million,million as compared to $1.5 million for the corresponding period in the prior year. The $0.1 million decrease principally relates to a decrease in compensation costs.
In the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, sales and marketing costs were approximately $5.0$5.8 million as compared to $4.1$4.0 million for the corresponding period in the prior year. The net increase of $0.9$1.8 million was principally related to:
In the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, general and administrative costs were approximately $5.4$5.8 million as compared to $6.2$5.6 million for the corresponding period in the prior year. The net decreaseincrease of $0.8$0.2 million was principally related to:
In the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, research and development costs were approximately $1.2 million, compared to $1.4$1.3 million for the corresponding period in the prior year. The net decrease of $0.2$0.1 million was principally related to a decrease in development costs, particularly in clinical trial activities and outside professional and consulting fees.:
In the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the amortization of acquired intangible assets remained relatively level at approximately $0.1 million, as compared to the corresponding period in the prior year.
In the three months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026,2026 and 2025, the sequential increasechange in the fair value of our convertible notes of approximately $1.8$1.0 million and $6.9 million, respectively, is reflected as other expenseincome in the Statement of Operations,Operations (see Note 10, Debt, to our accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements). The 2024convertible Convertible Notesnotes were initially measured at the issue-date estimated fair value and are subsequently remeasured at estimated fair value as of each reporting period end date.
The six months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025
In the six months ended June 30, 2026, revenue was approximately $2.7 million as compared to $2.0 million for the corresponding period in the prior year. The $0.7 million increase principally relates to the increase in consideration received for the performance of the EsoGuard tests.
In the six months ended June 30, 2026, the cost of revenue was relatively level at approximately $3.1 million, as compared to the corresponding period in the prior year.
Sales and marketing expenses
In the six months ended June 30, 2026, sales and marketing costs were approximately $10.8 million as compared to $8.1 million for the corresponding period in the prior year. The net increase of $2.7 million was principally related to
General and administrative expenses
In the six months ended June 30, 2026, general and administrative costs were approximately $11.2 million as compared to $11.8 million for the corresponding period in the prior year. The net decrease of $0.6 million was principally related to:
Research and development expenses
In the six months ended June 30, 2026, research and development costs were approximately $2.4 million compared to $2.7 million for the corresponding period in the prior year. The net decrease of $0.3 million was principally related to:
Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets
In the six months ended June 30, 2026, the amortization of acquired intangible assets remained relatively level at approximately $0.2 million, as compared to the corresponding period in the prior year.
Other Income and Expense
Change in fair value of convertible debt
In the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, the change in the fair value of our convertible notes of approximately $0.8 million and $7.6 million, respectively, is reflected as other expense in the Statement of Operations (see Note 10, Debt, to our accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements). The convertible notes were initially measured at the issue-date estimated fair value and are subsequently remeasured at estimated fair value as of each reporting period end date.
Results of Operations - continued
We are subject to all of the risks and uncertainties typically faced by medical device and diagnostic companies that devote substantially all of their efforts to the commercialization of their initial products and services. We experienced a net loss of approximately $13.9$25.6 million and used approximately $12.1$23.4 million of cash in operations during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026. Financing activities provided $5.5$22.3 million of cash during the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026. We ended the quarter with cash on-hand of $27.9$33.4 million as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026. We expect to continue to experience recurring losses and negative cash flow from operations, and will continue to fund our operations with debt and/or equity financing transactions, which in accordance with management’s plans may include conversions of our existing debt to equity and refinancing our existing debt obligations to extend the maturity date. The Company’sOur ability to continue operations 12 months beyond the issuance of the accompanying financial statements will depend upon generating substantial revenue that is conditioned on obtaining positive third-party reimbursement coverage for itsour EsoGuard Esophageal DNA Test from both government and private health insurance providers, and increasing revenue through contracting directly with self-insured employers, and upon raising additional capital through various potential sources including equity and/or debt financings or refinancing existing debt obligations. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are issued.
On April 24, 2026, the Company closed on the sale of 18,000,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $1.00 per share (the “Offering”).share. The net proceeds of the offering, after deducting approximately $1.2 million of the underwriting discount and other estimated expenses, was approximately $16.8 million.
On May 30, 2025, the Company entered into an “at-the-market offering” (“ATM”) for up to $25.0 million of its common stock that may be offered and sold under a Controlled Equity Offering Agreement between the Company and Maxim Group LLC. In the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026, the Company sold 4,161,747 shares through its at-the-market equity facility for net proceeds of approximately $5.3 million, after payment of 3% commissionscommissions, ofor approximately $0.2 million.
On November 22, 2024, the Company closed on the sale of $21.975 million in principal amount of 2024 Convertible Notes.Notes, as defined in Note 10, Debt, to our accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. Each 2024 Convertible Note has a 12.0% annual stated interest rate, a contractual maturity date of five years from the date of issuance, and a contractual conversion price of $1.00 per share of the Company’s common stock (subject to adjustment in certain circumstances). Under the 2024 Convertible Notes, the Company is subject to certain customary affirmative and negative covenants, including certain financial covenants. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of MarchJune 31,30, 2026. See Note 10, Debt, for more information.
On May 13, 2026, the Company and a majority-in-interest of the holders of the 2024 Convertible Notes entered into a waiver agreement, pursuant to which they agreed that the holders would not declare that an event of default has occurred due to the Company's failure to obtain a positive Medicare decision with respect to its EsoGuard product by May 22, 2026. Such waiver covers the period through August 22, 2026. See Note 10, Debt, for more information.
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reporting in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgements. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, we base our estimates on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be appropriate under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Our critical accounting estimates are as disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 as filed with the SEC on March 25, 2026. There have been no material changes to our critical accounting estimates in the threesix months ended MarchJune 31,30, 2026.
LUCD insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 1 Form 4 filing (1 insider, 1 trade date, 245,000 shares, about $245.0K) and open-market sales in 0 filings. Net open-market shares: 245,000 (purchases minus sales); net value about $245.0K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-20 | Matheis Dennis |
Open-market purchase | 245,000 | $1.00 | $245.0K |
Well-known investors holding LUCD (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 723,200 | $773.8K | 0.0% | Added 208% |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 71,300 | $76.3K | 0.0% | Reduced 86% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 36,362 | $38.9K | 0.0% | New position |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 11,320 | $13.0K | — | Sold out |