MBLY 10-K & 10-Q changes, risk factors and insider trading
Mobileye Global Inc. · Nasdaq · Services-Prepackaged Software · CIK 1910139 · All filings on SEC.gov
At a glance
What changed in the latest 10-K
Risk Factors
New heading “If we determine that our goodwill has become impaired, we may incur impairment charges, which would negatively impact our operating results.”
Removed heading “Our historical financial information may not be representative of our results as an independent public company.”
Largest changes
“If we determine that our goodwill has become impaired, we may incur impairment charges, which would negatively impact our operating results.”see in full comparison
“Costs to comply with Data Protection Laws and implement appropriate privacy and data protection measures are significant, and may require us to change our business practices and compliance manners. Any noncompliance could adversely affect our ability to collect, analyze, and store data, expose us to significant monetary penalties, damage to our reputation, result in suspension of online services or sites in certain countries, and even result in criminal sanctions. …”see in full comparison
Data privacy is subject to frequently changing rules and regulations, which sometimes conflict among the various jurisdictions and countries in which we provide services. We are subject to a variety of local, state, national and international laws, directives, and regulations that apply to the collection, use, retention, protection, security, disclosure, transfer, and other processing of personal data in the different jurisdictions in which we operate (“Data Protection Laws”). Any failure by us or our vendors or other business partners to comply with our public privacy notice or with U.S. federal, state, local, Israeli, Chinese, EU, or other foreign or international Data Protection Laws could result in regulatory or litigation-related actions against us, legal liability, fines, damages, ongoing audit requirements, and other significant costs. Global privacy legislation, enforcement, and policy activity in this area are rapidly expanding and creating a complex regulatory compliance environment. Because many Data Protection Laws are new or subject to recent revisions or updates, there is often little clarity as to their interpretation or best practices for compliance, as well as a lack of precedent for the scope of enforcement.see in full comparisonCostsIn addition, as the EU AI Act phased application may classify certain AI systems used in the context of autonomous driving, mobility, and large-scale monitoring of public spaces as high-risk AI systems, the AI Act may trigger additional obligations related tocomplydatawithgovernance,Datatransparency,ProtectionhumanLawsoversight, risk management, andimplementpost-marketappropriate privacy and data protection measures are significant, and may require us to change our business practices and compliance manners. Any noncompliance could adversely affect our ability to collect, analyze, and store data, expose us to significant monetary penalties, damage to our reputation, result in suspension of online services or sites in certain countries, and even result in criminal sanctions. Even our inadvertent failure to comply with Data Protection Laws could result in audits, regulatory inquiries, or proceedings against us by governmental entities or other third parties. Any inability to adequately address data privacy or data protection, or other information security-related concerns, including in each case in respect of our use of AI technologies, even if unfounded, to successfully negotiate privacy, data protection, or information security-related contractual terms with customers, or to comply and demonstrate compliance with Data Protection Laws, could result in additional cost and liability to us, harm our reputation and brand, and could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.monitoring.
“We perform an annual impairment assessment of goodwill at the reporting unit level in the fourth quarter of each year, or more frequently if indicators of potential impairment exist. The analysis may include both qualitative and quantitative factors to assess the likelihood of impairment. …”see in full comparison
“Changes in global tariff policies, import/export controls, or related trade restrictions could increase our costs or disrupt the supply of components used in our products. Our reliance on a global semiconductor and electronics supply chain means that new or expanded tariffs, retaliatory measures, or shifts in trade policy may lead to higher procurement expenses, longer lead times, or the need to qualify alternative suppliers. These factors could adversely affect our production schedules, margins, and our customers’ demand for products incorporating our technology.”see in full comparison
Trade disputes and protectionist measures, or continued uncertainty about such matters, could result in declining consumer confidence and slowing economic growth or recession, and could cause our customers to reduce, cancel, or alter the timing of their purchases with us.see in full comparisonSustainedSuch changes in global tariff policies, import/export controls or related trade restrictions could increase our costs or disrupt the supply of components used in our solutions or in our customers’ products. Our reliance on a global semiconductor and electronics supply chain means that new or expanded tariffs, retaliatory measures or shits in trade policy may lead to higher procurement expenses, longer lead times or the need to qualify alternative suppliers. These factors could adversely affect our production schedules, margins and our customers’ demand for products incorporating our technology. Additionally, sustained geopolitical tensions could lead to long-term changes in global trade and technology supply chains, and decoupling of global trade networks, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (70)
Our business, results of operations, and financial condition depend on our ability to complete development of our existing ADAS and autonomous driving programs and to develop and introduce new and enhanced solutions that incorporate and integrate the latest technological advancements in sensing and perception technologies, software and hardware, and camera, radar, lidar, mapping, and AI technologies to satisfy evolving customer, regulatory, and safety rating requirements. For example, we will need to complete the development and achieve cost efficient production at scale of new generations of our EyeQ™ SoCs and our software-defined imaging radar, and, in the case of AMaaS,sourceAMaaS, source lidar cost effectively, all of which are important components of our planned approach to address the AMaaS and consumer AV markets. This report may contain descriptions of our current expectations regarding the years by which we expect to obtain engineering samples, commence production, or release our anticipated future solutions. These time periods are subject to significant uncertainty. We may encounter significant unexpected technical and production challenges, or delays in completing the development of these and other solutions and ramping production in a cost-efficient manner particularly as our products become increasingly complex. The development of these and other new and enhanced solutions requires us to invest resources in research and development and also requires that we:
To compete successfully, we must maintain successful research and development efforts,efforts (including the design and development of next-generation EyeQ™ SoCs), develop and commercialize new solutions, and improve our existing solutions, all ahead of competitors. We are focusing our research and development efforts across several key emerging technologies, including computer vision, Compound AI and other AI technologies, the development of next-generation EyeQ™ SoCs, software-defined imaging radar, the True Redundancy™ sensor fusion architecture, the REM™ mapping technology and our RSS model, and our Mobileye Surround ADAS™, Mobileye SuperVision™, Mobileye Chauffeur™ and Mobileye Drive™ systems. Further, with the acquisition of Mentee Robotics, we will also focus our research and development efforts on the development of humanoid robotics, including AI technologies in connection therewith. These are ambitious initiatives, and we cannot guarantee that all of these efforts will deliver the benefits we anticipate or be homologated as expected. We must make research and development investments based on our views of the most promising approaches to address future customer needs in rapidly evolving markets, and we cannot be certain that we will target outour research and development investments appropriately,appropriately or correctly anticipate the manner in which these markets will evolve. To the extent our research and development efforts do not produce timely improvements in utility, accuracy, safety, cost and operational efficiency,efficiency (for example, our ability to deploy Mobileye Drive™ in vehicles without safety drivers in accordance with our expected schedule), our competitive position will be harmed. We do not expect all of our research and development investments to be successful. Some of our efforts to develop and market new solutions may fail, and the solutions we invest in and develop may be rejected by regulators or may not be well received by customers, who may adopt competing technologies. We make significant investments in research and development, and our investments at times may not contribute to our future operating results for several years, if at all, and such contributions at times may not meet our expectations or even cover the costs of such investments, which would adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
The ADAS and autonomous driving industries as well as the emergent humanoid robotics industry, are highly competitive, and we expect they will become even more competitive in the future. Our future success will depend on, among other things, our ability to continue developing superior advanced technology to remain competitive with our existing and any new competitors. Competition is based on, among other things, cost efficiency, reliability, the ability to develop and deploy increasingly complex technologies that provide for vehicle, passenger, and pedestrian safety in compliance with existing and future regulations, the ability to gather or access large validation datasets in order to train the required software and to continuously harvest new data in real-time, the ability to cost-effectively deploy hardware, the ability to integrate technologies and hardware with overall vehicle design and production, adoption by OEMs, and the ability to develop and maintain strategic relationships with other participants in the automotive industry.
A significant and growing number of established and new technology companies and automobile manufacturers have entered, or are reported to have plans to enter, the market for ADAS and autonomous driving solutions.solutions as well as the market for humanoid robotics. For example, certain of our competitors have announced that they are operating or developing autonomous robotaxis.robotaxis and/or humanoid robots. Some of our competitors have significantly greater or better-established resources than we do to devote to the design, development, manufacturing, distribution, promotion, sale, and support of their products. Automakers who seek to develop their own in-house solutions may also become indirect competitors. Some OEMs that have incorporated our solutions in the past have decided, and some OEMs that currently incorporate our solutions may decide to design in-house solutions to replace our solutions that they currently implement. For example, Tesla had previously incorporated our ADAS solutions in their vehicles but transitioned to their own in-house ADAS solutions in 2017. Further, in the third quarter of 2024, Zeekr announced their decision to utilize their in-house system instead of SuperVision™ for at least a major portion of production for their 001 model going forward. Mercedes-Benz is also employing its own in-house solutions, with others such as NIO, Volvo Cars, and Xpeng Motors also pursuing in-house solutions for portions of the ADAS software stack. In addition, our Tier 1 customers may be developing or may in the future develop competing solutions.
In the autonomous driving market, including AMaaS and consumer AV, we face competition from technology companies, internal development teams from the automakers themselves, sometimes in combination with investments in early-stage autonomous vehicle technology companies, Tier 1 automotive suppliers, and robotaxi providers. AMaaS competitors include Cruise, Tesla, Motional, Waymo, NVIDIA, Yandex and Zoox in the United States and Europe and Auto X, Baidu, Deeproute.ai, Didi Chuxing, Momenta, Pony.ai and WeRide in China. Consumer AV competitors include Sony, and Tesla, who are developing self-driving vehicles for consumers. Further, we face competition regarding the development of our Next Generation EyeQ™ chips from emerging chip manufacturers in markets such as China and our OEMs entering into the chip manufacturing space.
Competition in the humanoid and Physical AI robotics market is intense and rapidly evolving, with a growing number of well-capitalized companies developing general-purpose bipedal robots and related autonomy stacks for industrial and warehouse use. Mobileye and Mentee face competition from other humanoid robotics developers such as Tesla, Figure AI, Sanctuary AI, PAL Robotics, Agility Robotics and Boston Dynamics (of which HKMC holds an 80% beneficial ownership interest), as well as additional emerging players (including a number of Chinese robotics companies) seeking to commercialize similar capabilities.
Moovit competes against urban mobility applications and MaaS solutions, which provide transportation services and navigation data to consumers. Moovit’s free and subscription-based application competition includes Alphabet, Apple, Citymapper and Transit. Moovit’s application also competes with local urban and inter-city ticketing service providers that provide purchase and ticketing of public transit and mobilityservicesmobility services on their own platform. See “Item 1.Business — Our Competition.”
In 2021 and 2022, the semiconductor industry experienced widespread shortages of substrates and other components and available foundry manufacturing capacity. These factors, combined with the long lead times associated with wafer production, contributed to a shortage of semiconductors. During 2021 and 2022, STMicroelectronics, our sole supplier of EyeQ™ SoCs, was not able to meet our demand for EyeQ™ SoCs, causing a significant reduction in our inventory level, and we entered 2022 with significantly lower inventories of our EyeQ™ SoCs as a result of the limited supply during 2021. Starting in late 2022 and early 2023, such supply chain disruptions, raw material shortages and manufacturing limitations abated and during 2023, we successfully increased levels of EyeQ™ SoC inventory on hand, mitigating the potential for future supply constraints to cause a shortfall. However, in the event of a reoccurrence of supply chain constraints, and subject to the duration and severity thereof, we may be required to operate with minimal or no inventory of EyeQ™ SoCs or ECUs (including for Mobileye SuperVision™, Mobileye Chauffeur™, and Mobileye Drive™) on hand. As a result, we are substantially reliant on timely shipments of EyeQ™ SoCs from STMicroelectronics (or other suppliers) and ECUs from Quanta Computer (or other suppliers) to fulfill customer orders and if such a shortfall of chips or ECUs were to occur, we may be unable to offset future supply constraints through the use of inventory on hand. Since our EyeQ™ SoC is the core of our ADAS and autonomous driving solutions, continued, acute shortages in the supply of sufficient EyeQ™ SoCs to meet our production needs would impair our ability to meet our customers’ requirements in a timely manner, and would affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition potentially in an adverse manner.
We currently purchase all of our EyeQ™ SoCs from STMicroelectronics. Because of the complex proprietary nature of our EyeQ™ SoCs, any transition from STMicroelectronics to a new supplier or, if there were a disaster at any of STMicroelectronics’ facilities involved in manufacturing our EyeQ™ SoCs, bringing new facilities online, would take a significant period of time to complete and would likely result in our having insufficient inventory and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. In addition, our contractual relationship with STMicroelectronics does not provide us with long-term pricing or quantity guarantees, and both we and STMicroelectronics are free to terminate the arrangement at any time. Further, we are vulnerable to the risk that STMicroelectronics may be unable to meet demand for our EyeQ™ SoCs or cease operations altogether. Moreover, certain critical manufacturing steps for EyeQ™ SoCs, including wafer fabrication and advanced packaging, are performed by a limited number of suppliers, including Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (“TSMC”).TSMC. Any interruptions or delays in these manufacturing steps due to capacity constraints, equipment failures or geopolitical issues could significantly affect STMicroelectronics’s ability to manufacture and deliver EyeQ™ SoCs on time, impacting our operations and customer relationships. STMicroelectronics depends on TSMC as its subcontractor to manufacture our EyeQ™ SoCs, particularly our EyeQ™5 and EyeQ™ 6 SoCs, and as a result, we are also vulnerable to the risk that TSMC may be unable to meet demand or cease operations altogether. In addition, we may be affected by supply constraints and increased costs involving STMicroelectronics and TSMC resulting from any reoccurrence of the global semiconductor shortage. See “— We have previously experienced constraints in the supply of our EyeQ™ SoCs as the result of the global semiconductor shortage during 2021 and 2022, and future shortages in the supply of our EyeQ™ SoCs or other critical parts would adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.”
A large number of direct and indirect suppliers and vendors provide materials, equipment, and services that are used in the production of our solutions and other aspects of our business. Where possible, we seek to have several sources of supply, and to ensure our suppliers and vendors have multiple sources of supply as well. However, for certain materials, equipment, and services, we, and/or our suppliers and vendors, rely on a single or a limited number of direct and indirect suppliers and vendors, or upon direct and indirect suppliers and vendors in a single location, for example STMicroelectronics and TSMC. In addition, direct and indirect supplier and vendor consolidation, financial health or business failures can impact the nature, quality, availability, and pricing of the products and services available to us. For example, we currently depend on Amazon Web Services for cloud services in connection with our REM™ mapping system, Roadbook™, and AMaaS solutions including the Moovit platform, and a failure of such cloud services would result in interruptions to our services. In addition, the semiconductor industry has previously experienced widespread shortages of substrates. See “— We have previously experienced constraints in the supply of our EyeQ™ SoCs as the result of the global semiconductor shortage during 2021 and 2022, and future shortages in the supply of our EyeQ™ SoCs or other critical parts would adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition” and “— We depend on STMicroelectronics to manufacture our EyeQ™ SoCs.” Further, in 2025 and in 2026 the global AI industry has generated increased demand for semiconductor components across multiple industries, including components necessary for the production of our solutions, such as EyeQ™ SoCs and ECUs for Mobileye SuperVision™, Mobileye Chauffeur™ and Mobileye Drive™. This new demand has resulted in and may continue to result in shortages of components necessary for our solutions, substantial increases in prices for such components and suppliers requiring us to increase lead times and purchase greater quantities of such components in advance in order to secure sufficient supply. Such shortages of components, as well as the increases in pricing, order requirements and lead times, has and may continue to impact our ability to supply solutions to our customers in order to meet demand as well as impact OEMs’ ability to purchase our solutions.
Significant changes in the markets in which we purchase materials, components, and supplies for the production of our solutions may adversely affect our profitability. Our contractual relationship with STMicroelectronics, our sole supplier of EyeQ™ SoCs, and with other suppliers does not provide us with long-term pricing or quantity guarantees. As a result of the global semiconductor shortage in 2021 and 2022 as well as inflationary pressures, we have experienced and may experience in the future increases in the cost of our EyeQ™ SoCs. For example, the AI industry has generated significant demand for components necessary for the production of our solutions and has resulted in shortages, excess lead times and increases in the prices of components. See “— We face additional supply chain risks and risks of interruption of requisite services, including, as a result of our reliance on a single supplier or limited suppliers and vendors, for certain components, equipment, and services.” We have adjusted, and continue to seek to adjust, the prices charged to our customers to offset these cost increases, but anticipate that, despite such price increases, our percentage gross margin may decrease, at least in the short term, as a result of these cost increases. Competitive and market pressures limit our ability to recover increases in costs through increases in prices we charge to our customers, and, even where we are able to achieve price increases that would offset such increased costs, in some cases there may be a delay before we are able to do so. The inability to pass on price increases to our customers when raw material or component prices increase rapidly or are significantly higher than historic levels would adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Our software and hardware, including our EyeQ™ SoCsSoCs, AI technologies and AIMentee technologies,Robotics’s humanoid robot systems, are complex and, from time to time, have had, and could have or could be alleged to have, defects in design or manufacturing, inadequate, inaccurate, biased or otherwise flawed data or algorithms used to train certain AI technologies, security vulnerabilities or other errors, failures, or other issues of not functioning in accordance with their specifications or as expected. Some errors or defects in our solutions have been, and could be, initially undetected and only discovered after they have been tested, commercialized, and deployed by customers. Alleged or actual defects in any of our solutions could result in adverse publicity for us, warranty claims, litigation against us, legal expenses and damages, our customers never being able to commercialize technology incorporating our solutions, negative publicity for our customers, and other consequences. Errors, defects, or security vulnerabilities could result in serious injury to or death of the end users of vehicles incorporating our solutions, or those in the surrounding area, including as a result of traffic accidents and collisions. If that is the case, we would incur significant additional development costs and product recall, repair, or replacement costs.
In addition, humanoid robotics is an emerging industry and the types of legal claims brought against us, if any, may be complex and unprecedented. We may be required to incur significant costs and resources related to any litigation related to the use of humanoid robot systems as we continue the development and deployment of technologies.
We invest significant effort and money seeking OEM selection of our ADAS and autonomous driving solutions, and there can be no assurance that these efforts will result in the selection of our solutions for use in production models. If we fail to achieve a design win after incurring substantial expenditures in these efforts, our future business, results of operations, and financial condition would be adversely affected.
In connection with our design wins, we typically receive preliminary estimates from OEMs of their anticipated production volumes for the models relating to those design wins. Those estimates may be revised significantly by the OEMs, potentially multiple times, and may not be representative of future production volumes associated with those design wins, which could be significantly higher or lower than estimated. For example, several automakers decreased their initial 2023 vehicle production projections, and we had to adjust our forecasts accordingly. Furthermore, long development cycles or vehicle model cancellations or postponements would adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. In addition, in prior periods, including during the global semi-conductor shortage in 2021 and 2022, certain Tier 1 customers increased their orders for components and parts, including our solutions, to counteract the impact of supply chain shortages for auto parts, and we expect following the abatement of such shortages, these Tier 1 customers in turn will utilize such accrued inventory on hand before placing new orders to meet the demand of OEMs in current or future periods. As a result, some demand for our solutions and the corresponding revenue from these customers were shifted to earlier time periods than otherwise would have occurred absent a general supply chain shortage and inflationary environment during prior periods. For example, as a result of our standard planning process for 2024, we became aware in late 2023 that our Tier 1 customers accrued significant excess inventory during 2021 and 2022 in a desire to avoid parts shortages, and in 2023 as a result of lower-than-expected production at certain OEMs. We estimate that our customers used the vast majority of this excess, accrued inventory in 2024 in accordance with our expectations, but there is no guarantee that orders will remain normalized or that our customers won’t build up excess inventory in the future. In addition, the AI industry has generated significant demand for components necessary for the production of our solutions. Such component shortages and resulting price increases may cause our Tier 1 customers and OEM customers to increase their orders for our solutions to counteract any impact such component shortages may have on our ability to meet demand. As a result, some demand for our solutions and the corresponding revenue from these customers may be shifted to earlier time periods than otherwise would have occurred absent such shortages. See “— We face additional supply chain risks and risks of interruption of requisite services, including, as a result of our reliance on a single supplier or limited suppliers and vendors, for certain components, equipment, and services.”
The success of our AMaaS and robotaxi solutions will depend on their effective deployment and operation by third parties.parties, and may be adversely affected by regulatory developments, safety incidents, negative media coverage or public perception.
TheOur AMaaS and robotaxi strategy is primarily focused on enabling third parties, such as vehicle manufacturers, fleet operators, transportation network companies and other mobility service providers to deploy and operate autonomous vehicles using our technology, including Mobileye Drive™. As a result, the success of our AMaaS directed solutions will depend significantly on the ability and willingness of these third parties to integrate our customerstechnology into their vehicles and partners,platforms, suchmake assubstantial transportation network companies, effectively deployingupfront and operatingongoing investments, obtain and maintain regulatory approvals, deploy and operate fleets safely and reliably, and achieve sufficient utilization and consumer acceptance. Many of these factors are outside of our solutioncontrol, and any failure, delay or change in strategy by our partners could limit the future,scale, timing or commercial viability of robotaxi deployments and theiradversely failure to do so may result from factors outsideaffect our control.business, results of operations and financial condition. We are collaborating with various business-to-business and business-to-consumer channels for the purpose of deploying Mobileye Drive™. As part of our business-to-business go-to-market strategy, we expect to sell and integrate Mobileye Drive™ to a range of shuttle network operators and vehicle OEMs that intend to operate consumer-facing AMaaS, transportation on demand, and delivery services. Additionally, as part of our business-to-customer go-to-market strategy, we expect to deploy Mobileye Drive™-enabled AMaaS offerings by integrating them with our self-driving vehicles in partnership with transportation network companies. Such third parties may also terminate our partnerships with them. Any failures by third parties to effectively deploy and operate our AMaaS solutions, or the termination of our relationships with any such third parties, would adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Our reliance on third-party partners for robotaxi deployments exposes us to risks associated with complex and evolving commercial relationships, including disagreements regarding deployment schedules, operational responsibilities, economics, branding, data access and use, liability allocation, and the allocation of costs associated with vehicle hardware, software updates, maintenance and fleet operations. Our partners may also face their own operational, financial or strategic challenges, may decide to delay, reduce or discontinue their autonomous mobility programs, may pursue competing technologies or in-house solutions, or may exit certain markets or geographies, any of which could adversely affect demand for our technology and our ability to achieve anticipated benefits from our AMaaS and robotaxi initiatives.
Robotaxi services represent a particularly demanding application of autonomous driving technology and are subject to heightened technological, safety, regulatory and operational risks compared to driver-assistance or consumer autonomous driving applications. Autonomous vehicles intended for driverless commercial operation must function reliably across diverse and complex real-world conditions, including dense urban environments, variable weather, unpredictable behavior by other road users and rare or novel edge cases. Any real or perceived failure of vehicles incorporating our technology to operate safely could result in accidents, injuries or fatalities, increased regulatory scrutiny, litigation, reputational harm, reduced consumer acceptance and reluctance by partners or regulators to approve or expand robotaxi deployments.
In addition, the success of our robotaxi platform and future autonomous mobility products may be significantly influenced by media coverage, public commentary and public perception regarding autonomous driving technologies generally, and robotaxi services in particular. Media coverage of accidents, system failures, regulatory actions or other events involving autonomous vehicles, whether or not such events involve our technology or accurately reflect its performance, may disproportionately influence public opinion, regulatory attitudes and the willingness of consumers, fleet operators and transportation network companies and other mobility service providers to adopt or expand robotaxi services. Negative or inaccurate media coverage, heightened scrutiny by regulators or policymakers, or shifts in public sentiment regarding the safety or reliability of autonomous vehicles could adversely affect demand for our products, delay commercialization efforts and impair the long-term adoption of our autonomous mobility solutions.
Robotaxi services are also subject to evolving, fragmented and jurisdiction-specific regulatory regimes governing autonomous vehicle testing and deployment, commercial transportation services, data privacy, cybersecurity, insurance and ongoing reporting obligations. Regulatory requirements may change over time, differ materially across jurisdictions and impose conditions that limit operational flexibility, increase costs or delay or prevent large-scale deployment. There can be no assurance that the regulatory approvals required for the widespread commercialization of robotaxi services will be obtained on a timely basis, on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.
The success of our Cloud-Enhanced ADAS™,ADASTM, Mobileye Surround ADAS™, Mobileye SuperVision™, Mobileye Chauffeur™ and Mobileye Drive™ systems requires significant amounts of fresh mapping data from series production vehicles around the world in order to develop RoadBook™. We currently have agreements in place that provide OEMs with economic benefits or technological advantages to provide us with data arriving from OEM series production vehicles, but there is no guarantee that we can keep such agreements in place or that OEMs will continue to cooperate with us. If we are not able to obtain mapping data for RoadBook™, our Cloud-Enhanced ADAS™, Mobileye Surround ADAS™, Mobileye SuperVision™, Mobileye Chauffeur™ and Mobileye Drive™ systems will not perform as expected, which would adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
We are highly dependent on Professor Shashua, our President and Chief Executive Officer. While Professor Shashua is highly active in our management and allocates a significant amount of time to our company, he does not devote his full time and attention to our company. For example, Professor Shashua is also the Chairman and co-founder of AI21 Labs, which works to use AI to understand and create natural language, the Co-Chairman and co-founder of OrCam, which harnesses computer vision and AI to assist the visually and hearing impaired, the Founder of One Zero Digital Bank, an entirely digital independent bank being developed in Israel, the Chairman and co-founder of Mentee Robotics, which aimsMobileye toacquired buildon humanoidFebruary robots,3, 2026, a co-founder, CEO and director of AA-I Technologies, which is developing AI super intelligence for scientific and research applications, and the Sachs Chair in Computer Science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, where he teaches and supervises graduate students. Professor Shashua may also become involved in additional ventures from time to time. The loss of Professor Shashua, or a significant diminution in his contribution to us, would adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Hiring and retaining qualified executives, developers, engineers, technical staff, and sales representatives are critical to our business. The competition for highly skilled employees in our industry is increasingly intense. Competitors for technical talent increasingly seek to hire our employees. Changes in the interpretation and application of employment-related laws to our workforce practices may also result in increased operating costs and less flexibility in how we meet our changing workforce needs. To help attract, retain, and motivate qualified employees, we have previously used and intend to continue to use employee incentives such as share-based awards. Our employee hiring and retention also depend on our ability to build and maintain a diverse and inclusive workplace culture and be viewed as an employer of choice. If our share-based or other compensation programs and workplace culture cease to be viewed as competitive, our ability to attract, retain, and motivate employees would be weakened, which would harm our results of operations. Equity compensation has been, and will continue to be, an important part of our future compensation strategy and a significant component of our future expenses, which we expect to increase over time. Moreover, sustained declines in our stock price can reduce the retention value of our share-based awards. Further, with our acquisition of the Mentee business in the first quarter of 2026, we gained approximately 87 new employees, including employees important to the ongoing integration of the business and technologies. We may have to spend additional resources to successfully integrate and retain such employees. If we do not effectively hire, onboard, retain, and motivate key employees, then our business, results of operations, and financial condition would be adversely affected.
Changes in our management team can also disrupt our business. Our management and senior leadership team has significant industry experience, and their knowledge and relationships would be difficult to replace. Further, Professor Amnon Shashua, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Professor Shai Shalev-Shwartz, our Chief Technology Officer, are both prominent in the computer science, AI and technology communities, especially in Israel. Their service at Mobileye is an important contribution to our ability to attract, retain and motivate key talent. Leadership changes may occur from time to time, and we cannot predict whether significant resignations will occur or whether we will be able to recruit qualified personnel. In addition, the relationships and reputation that members of our management and key leadership have established and maintain with our Tier 1 customers and OEMs contribute to our ability to maintain strong relationships with key partners and to identify new business opportunities.
We face integration risks and costs associated with companies, assets, employees, products, and technologies that we have or that we may acquire.acquire, including in respect of our acquisition of Mentee Robotics Ltd.
We have in the past and, if we are presented with appropriate opportunities, we may in the future acquire or make investments in complementary companies, assets, employees, products, and technologies. We face risks, uncertainties, and disruptions associated with the integration process of any such acquisitions or investments, including difficulties in the integration of the operations of an acquired company, integration of acquired technology with our solutions, diversion of our management’s attention from other business concerns, the potential loss of key employees or customers of the acquired business, and our inability to achieve the strategic goals of such acquisitions and investments. Any failure to successfully integrate other companies, assets, employees, products, or technologies that we have or may acquire will adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Furthermore, we may have to incur debt or issue equity securities to pay for any future acquisitions or investments, the issuance of which could be dilutive to our existing stockholder.stockholders.
On February 3, 2026, we acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding stock of Mentee Robotics Ltd., a privately held Israeli company focused on humanoid robotics, in exchange for a purchase price consisting of cash and shares of Class A common stock. We face risks, uncertainties and potential disruptions with the integration of Mentee Robotics and its personnel, technology and operations. We may not realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition, and our operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected. Humanoid robotics represents a nascent and rapidly evolving market characterized by significant technological complexity, long development timelines, potentially high capital requirements, uncertain customer demand, and evolving regulatory and safety frameworks. The commercialization of humanoid robotics remains subject to significant uncertainties, including regulatory approval across jurisdictions, public acceptance, safety performance, scalability and economic viability.
We are affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates, including those in connection with recentprior inflationary trends in the United States.
We are exposed to adverse as well as beneficial movements in currency exchange rates. Our functional currency is the U.S. dollar, and we incur financial expenses in connection with fluctuations in value due to foreign exchange differences between our monetary assets and liabilities denominated in New Israeli Shekels and, to a much lesser extent, the Euro, the Chinese Yuan and the Japanese Yen. Although most of our sales occur in U.S. dollars, and our financial results are reported in U.S. dollars, the payroll and other operating expenses that are denominated in New Israeli Shekels are well above half of these expenses. An increase in the value of the dollar will increase the real cost to our customers of our solutions in those markets outside the U.S. where we sell in dollars,dollars. andA adecrease weakenedin the value of the dollar will increase the costdollar value of operating expenses suchdenominated in New Israeli Shekels, including for example the majority of our payroll expenses, as payroll,well utilities,as tax,some marketingof expenses,our utilities and capital expenditures. In 2024, the Company initiated a foreign currency cash flow hedging program, designed to hedge the Company’s foreign exchange rate risk resulting from its ILS payroll expenses, but there is no guarantee that volatility in exchange rates will not adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our historical financial information may not be representative of our results as an independent public company.
The historical financial information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may not necessarily reflect our results of operations, financial position, and cash flows in the future or what they would have been had we been a separate, stand-alone company during the years presented. Our historical financial data presented in this report includes costs of our business, which may not, however, reflect the expenses we would have incurred as a stand-alone company for the years presented. Actual costs that may have been incurred if we had operated as a stand-alone company would depend on a number of factors, including the chosen organizational structure, the outsourcing of certain functions, and other strategic decisions. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our historical financial statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this report.
We collect and maintain information in digital form that is necessary to conduct our business, and we rely on information technology systems and networks (“IT systems”) to process, transmit, and store electronic information, and to manage or support our business and consumer facing activities. Our operations routinely involve receiving, storing, processing, and transmitting confidential or sensitive information pertaining to our business, customers, suppliers, employees, and other sensitive matters, including trade secrets, other proprietary business information, and personal information. Although we have established physical, logical, electronic, and organizational measures designed to safeguard and secure our systems to prevent a data breach or compromise, and to prevent damage to or downtime of our systems, and although we rely on commercially available systems, software, tools, and monitoring to provide security for our IT systems and the processing, transmission, and storage of digital information, we cannot guarantee that such measures will be adequate to detect, prevent, or mitigate cyber incidents. The implementation, maintenance, segregation, and improvement of these measures requires significant management time, support, and cost. Moreover, there are inherent risks associated with developing, improving, expanding, and updating current systems, including the disruption of our data management, procurement, production execution, finance, supply chain, and sales and service processes. These risks may affect our ability to manage our data and inventory, procure parts or supplies, or produce, sell, deliver, and service our solutions, adequately protect our intellectual property, or achieve and maintain compliance with, or realize available benefits under, applicable laws, regulations, and contracts.
WeAs third party and supply chain cybersecurity risks have become a heightened focus, we cannot be sure that the IT systems upon which we rely, including those of our third-party vendors or suppliers, will be effectively implemented, maintained, or expanded as planned. While cyberattacks against our third-party vendors or suppliers have not materially adversely affected us to date, future cyberattacks on such third parties may cause significant disruptions and materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Additionally, any contractual protections with such third parties, including our right to indemnification, if any at all, may be limited or insufficient to prevent a negative impact on our business from such cyberattacks. Despite the implementation of preventative and detective security controls, our and such third parties’ IT systems are vulnerable to damage, shutdown, or interruption from a variety of sources, including telecommunications or network failures or interruptions, system malfunction, natural disasters, cyber-crime, terrorism, and war. Additionally, our IT systems and products may be vulnerable to malicious acts by hackers, including through the use of AI and automation, which may increase the speed and effectiveness of attacks, and through the use of computer viruses, malware (including ransomware), phishing attacks, or denial of service attacks.
We have experienced data breaches, cyberattacks, attempts to breach our systems, and other similar incidents, none of which have resulted in a material adverse impact to our business or operations, but there can be no guarantee we will not experience an incident that would have such an impact. Such incidents, whether or not successful, could result in our incurring significant costs related to, for example, rebuilding internal systems, writing down inventory value, implementing additional threat protection measures, providing modifications to our solutions, defending against litigation, responding to regulatory inquiries or actions, paying damages, providing customers with incentives to maintain the business relationship, or taking other remedial steps with respect to third parties, as well as reputational harm. Recent regulatory developments enhance cybersecurity disclosure and incident reporting requirements, and may increase the likelihood that cybersecurity incidents result in regulatory inquiries, reporting obligations, or enforcement actions. In addition, cybersecurity threats are constantly evolving, including through the use of AI, thereby increasing the difficulty of successfully defending against them or implementing adequate preventative measures. As a result of and following the COVID-19 pandemic, remote work and remote access to our network and systems have increased significantly, which also increases our cybersecurity attack surface. There has also been an increase in cyberattack volume, frequency, and sophistication driven by the global enablement of remote workforces. We seek to detect and investigate unauthorized attempts and attacks against our network and solutions and to prevent their recurrence where practicable through changes to our internal processes and tools and changes or updates to our solutions. However, despite the implementation of preventative and detective security controls, we, and the third parties upon which we rely, remain potentially vulnerable to additional known or unknown cybersecurity threats. In some instances, we, our suppliers, our customers, and end users, can be unaware of an incident or its magnitude and effects. Even when a security breach is detected, the full extent of the breach may not be determined, and even if determined, a full investigation may require time and resources. Any actual or perceived security incident could result in, among other things, unfavorable publicity, governmental or regulatory inquiry and oversight, difficulty in marketing our services, allegations by our customers that we have not performed our contractual obligations, litigation by affected parties, including our customers, and possible financial obligations for damages related to the theft or misuse of such information or inventory, any of which would adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Malicious cybersecurity attacks against our in-vehicle systems that relate to automotive safety and related data, such as the data described in the preceding sentence, could potentially lead to bodily injury or death of end users, passengers, and others. Any unauthorized access to or control of vehicles incorporating our solutions or their systems could adversely impact the safety of those vehicles or outside such vehicles, or result in legal or regulatory claims or proceedings, liability, or regulatory penalties. Moreover, currentexisting as well as newfuture law,laws suchand as the data law in Massachusettsregulations that permitsrequire or permit third-party access to vehicle data and related systems, such as the Massachusetts data access law and proposed federal “right to repair” legislation, including the U.S. Repair Act, could expose our vehicle systems and vehicles incorporating our systems to third-party access without appropriate security measures in place, leading to new safety and security risks, and reducing trust and confidence in our solutions. In addition, regardless of their accuracy, reports of unauthorized access to our solutions, their systems, or data, as well as other factors that may result in the perception that our solutions, their systems, or data are capable of being hacked, could harm our reputation, and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Data privacy is subject to frequently changing rules and regulations, which sometimes conflict among the various jurisdictions and countries in which we provide services. We are subject to a variety of local, state, national and international laws, directives, and regulations that apply to the collection, use, retention, protection, security, disclosure, transfer, and other processing of personal data in the different jurisdictions in which we operate (“Data Protection Laws”). Any failure by us or our vendors or other business partners to comply with our public privacy notice or with U.S. federal, state, local, Israeli, Chinese, EU, or other foreign or international Data Protection Laws could result in regulatory or litigation-related actions against us, legal liability, fines, damages, ongoing audit requirements, and other significant costs. Global privacy legislation, enforcement, and policy activity in this area are rapidly expanding and creating a complex regulatory compliance environment. Because many Data Protection Laws are new or subject to recent revisions or updates, there is often little clarity as to their interpretation or best practices for compliance, as well as a lack of precedent for the scope of enforcement. CostsIn addition, as the EU AI Act phased application may classify certain AI systems used in the context of autonomous driving, mobility, and large-scale monitoring of public spaces as high-risk AI systems, the AI Act may trigger additional obligations related to complydata withgovernance, Datatransparency, Protectionhuman Lawsoversight, risk management, and implementpost-market appropriate privacy and data protection measures are significant, and may require us to change our business practices and compliance manners. Any noncompliance could adversely affect our ability to collect, analyze, and store data, expose us to significant monetary penalties, damage to our reputation, result in suspension of online services or sites in certain countries, and even result in criminal sanctions. Even our inadvertent failure to comply with Data Protection Laws could result in audits, regulatory inquiries, or proceedings against us by governmental entities or other third parties. Any inability to adequately address data privacy or data protection, or other information security-related concerns, including in each case in respect of our use of AI technologies, even if unfounded, to successfully negotiate privacy, data protection, or information security-related contractual terms with customers, or to comply and demonstrate compliance with Data Protection Laws, could result in additional cost and liability to us, harm our reputation and brand, and could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.monitoring.
Costs to comply with Data Protection Laws and implement appropriate privacy and data protection measures are significant, and may require us to change our business practices and compliance manners. Any noncompliance could adversely affect our ability to collect, analyze, and store data, expose us to significant monetary penalties, damage to our reputation, result in suspension of online services or sites in certain countries, and even result in criminal sanctions. Even our inadvertent failure to comply with Data Protection Laws could result in audits, regulatory inquiries, or proceedings against us by governmental entities or other third parties. Any inability to adequately address data privacy or data protection, or other information security-related concerns, including in each case in respect of our use of AI technologies (which are subject to increasing regulatory scrutiny and, in certain jurisdictions, new compliance frameworks applicable to high-risk or large-scale AI deployments), even if unfounded, to successfully negotiate privacy, data protection, or information security-related contractual terms with customers, or to comply and demonstrate compliance with Data Protection Laws, could result in additional cost and liability to us, harm our reputation and brand, and could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Despite our efforts, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy, reverse engineer, disclose, obtain, or use our technologies or systems. Our competitors may also be able to independently develop similar products or services that are competitive to ours or design around our issued patents. If third parties obtain patent protection with respect to such technologies, they may assert that our technology infringes, misappropriates or otherwise violates their patents and seek to charge us a licensing fee or otherwise preclude or make costlier the use of our technology. Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce or defend our intellectual property rights, to prevent unauthorized parties from copying or reverse engineering our solutions, to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others or to block the importation of infringing products into the United States or other countries. We have been, and in the future may be, a party to claims and litigation as a result of alleged infringement, misappropriation or other violation by third parties of our intellectual property. Even when we sue other parties for such infringement, that suit may have adverse consequences for our business. Any such suit is likely to be time-consuming and expensive to resolve and may divert our management’s time and attention from our business, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition, and legal fees related to such litigation will increase our operating expenses and may reduce our net income.income (loss). Any claims we assert against perceived infringers could provoke these parties to assert counterclaims against us, alleging that we infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate their intellectual property or alleging that our intellectual property is invalid or unenforceable. Furthermore, any litigation initiated by us could result in a court or governmental agency invalidating or rendering unenforceable our patents or other intellectual property rights upon which the suit is based, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
While we take steps to monitor the use of open-source software in our solutions, processes and technology and try to ensure that no open-source software is used in such a way as to require us to disclose the source code to the related product, processes, or technology when we do not wish to do so, such use could inadvertently occur. Additionally, if a third-party software provider has incorporated certain types of open sourceopen-source software into software we license from such third party for our solutions, processes, or technology, we could, under certain circumstances, be required to disclose the source code to our solutions, processes, or technology. This could harm our intellectual property position and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Regulations governing the automotive industry impose stringent compliance and reporting requirements in response to product recalls and safety issues in the automotive industry, including a duty to report, subject to strict timing requirements, safety defects with, or reports of injuries relating to, our solutions and requirements that a manufacturer recall and repair vehicles that contain safety defects or fail to comply with applicable safety standards. If we do not rapidly address any safety concerns or defects involving our solutions, our business, results of operations,operations and financial condition would be adversely affected.
Likewise, national security and foreign policy concerns may prompt governments to impose trade or other restrictions, which could make it more difficult to sell our solutions in, or restrict our access to, certain markets. In this regard, our business activities are subject to various trade and economic sanctions laws and regulations, including, without limitation, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control’s sanctions programs and the Export Administration Regulations issued by the U.S. Department of Commerce. These rules may prohibit or restrict our ability to, directly or indirectly, conduct activities or dealings in or with certain countries or involving certain persons, or otherwise affect our business. New measures imposed by the United States, the European Union, or others could restrict certain of our operations and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition, including for example the controls announced by BIS in January 2025 on advanced computing chips and certain closed AI model weights.condition. Although we take steps to comply with applicable laws and regulations, our failure to successfully comply with applicable sanctions or export control rules may expose us to negative legal and business consequences, including civil or criminal penalties and government investigations.
Additionally, tensions between the United States and China have led to increased tariffs and trade restrictions, including tariffs applicable to some of our solutions, and have affected customer ordering patterns. In addition to imposing economic sanctions on certain Chinese individuals and entities, the United States has imposed restrictions on the export of U.S.-regulated products and technology to certain Chinese technology companies. For example, the United States has enacted, and subsequently updated, controls on certain transactions involving items for semiconductor manufacturing end uses and advanced computing integrated circuits destined for China. Most recently, BIS adopted final rules in January 2025 prohibiting certain transactions involving the sale or import of connected vehicles integrating specific hardware or software with a sufficient nexus to China or Russia. Conversely,In response to expanding U.S. export controls, the People’s Republic of China has increasingly adopted retaliatory and defensive trade measures. These measures have included export controls on critical rare-earth materials and related to certain advanced semiconductors. In addition, the People’s Republic of China has implemented a series of industrial policies and other measures, including its “Made15th inFive-Year ChinaPlan 2025(2026-2030)” and “Artificial Intelligence Plus (AI+) Initiative” policy, to incentivize the development and growth of key industries domestically, such as robotics, aerospace and semiconductors, and to reduce reliance on foreign technology. These policies have also extended to ADAS and autonomous vehicle technologies, which has led to Chinese OEMs and other businesses choosing solutions from our Chinese competitors rather than our products, despite any competitive advantage our products may have in respect of price and/or performance. Although we do not believe that these recent controls and industrial policies and other retaliatory measures will materially impede our ability to conduct our business, there can be no assurance that these or future restrictions would not materially adversely affect our financial performance. We derive significant revenue from China. In 20242025 and 2023,2024, we derived approximately 26%23% and 31%26% respectively, of our revenue from shipments of products to China. It is difficult to predict what further trade-related actions governments may take, which may include trade restrictions and additional or increased tariffs and export controls imposed on short notice, and we may be unable to quickly and effectively react to or mitigate such actions.
Changes in global tariff policies, import/export controls, or related trade restrictions could increase our costs or disrupt the supply of components used in our products. Our reliance on a global semiconductor and electronics supply chain means that new or expanded tariffs, retaliatory measures, or shifts in trade policy may lead to higher procurement expenses, longer lead times, or the need to qualify alternative suppliers. These factors could adversely affect our production schedules, margins, and our customers’ demand for products incorporating our technology.
Trade disputes and protectionist measures, or continued uncertainty about such matters, could result in declining consumer confidence and slowing economic growth or recession, and could cause our customers to reduce, cancel, or alter the timing of their purchases with us. SustainedSuch changes in global tariff policies, import/export controls or related trade restrictions could increase our costs or disrupt the supply of components used in our solutions or in our customers’ products. Our reliance on a global semiconductor and electronics supply chain means that new or expanded tariffs, retaliatory measures or shits in trade policy may lead to higher procurement expenses, longer lead times or the need to qualify alternative suppliers. These factors could adversely affect our production schedules, margins and our customers’ demand for products incorporating our technology. Additionally, sustained geopolitical tensions could lead to long-term changes in global trade and technology supply chains, and decoupling of global trade networks, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
The current conflict between Ukraine and Russia has caused uncertainty about economic and political stability, increasing volatility in the credit and financial markets and disrupting the global economy. The United States, the European Union, and several other countries have imposed far-reaching sanctions and export control restrictions on Russian entities and individuals, including for example recent additional sanctions imposed by the European Union under Article 12g of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014. These measures could constrain our ability to work with Russian companies or individuals in connection with the development of our solutions in the future. These sanctions and export controls may also contribute to higher oil and gas prices and inflation, which could reduce demand in the global automotive sector and therefore reduce demand for our solutions. There is also a risk that Russia, as a retaliatory action to sanctions, may launch cyberattacks against the United States, the European Union, or other countries or their infrastructures and businesses. Additional consequences of the conflict may include diminished liquidity and credit availability, declines in consumer confidence, declines in economic growth, and various shortages and supply chain disruptions. While we do not currently directly rely on goods or services sourced in Russia or Ukraine and thus have not experienced any direct disruptions, we may experience indirect disruptions in our supply chain. Any of the foregoing factors, including developments or effects that we cannot yet predict, may adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Although we are incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware, our headquarters and research and development center are located in the State of Israel, and as of December 28,27, 2024,2025, substantially all of our equipment and tangible long-lived assets were located in Israel. Many of our employees, including certain members of our management, operate from our offices that are located in Jerusalem, Israel. In addition, a number of our officers and directors are residents of Israel. Accordingly, political, economic, and military conditions in Israel and the surrounding region may directly affect our business and operations. In recent years, Israel has been engaged in sporadic armed conflicts with Hamas, an Islamist terrorist group that controls the Gaza Strip, with Hezbollah, an Islamist terrorist group that controls large portions of southern Lebanon, and with Iranian-backed military forces in Syria. In addition, Iran has threatened to attack Israel and may be developing nuclear weapons. On October 7, 2023, Hamas launched a series of attacks on civilian and military targets in Southern Israel and Central Israel, to which the Israel Defense Forces have responded. In addition, both Hezbollah and the Houthi movement have attacked military and civilian targets in Israel, to which Israel has responded, including through increased air and ground operations in Lebanon. In addition, the Houthi movement has attacked international shipping lanes in the Red Sea.Sea, to which both Israel and the United States responded. Further, on April 13, 2024 and October 1, 2024, Iran launched a series of drone and missile strikes against Israel, to which Israel hasresponded. responded.Most recently, on June 13, 2025 Israel launched a preemptive attack on Iran to which Iran responded with ballistic missile and drone attacks. On June 23, 2025, Israel and Iran agreed to a ceasefire, although there is no assurance that the ceasefire will continue. On October 9, 2025, Israel, Hamas, the United States and other countries in the region agreed to a framework for a ceasefire in Gaza between Israel and Hamas. How long and how severe the current conflictconflicts in Gaza, Northern Israel, LebanonLebanon, Iran or the broader region becomeslast and become is unknown at this time and any continued clash among Israel, Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran or other countries or militant groups in the region may escalate in the future into a greater regional conflict. To date our operations have not been materially affected, although as of JanuaryFebruary 31,3, 20252026 approximately 3.7%3.3% of our employees have been called to reserve duty in the Israel Defense Forces. However, any hostilities involving Israel, regional geopolitical instability or the interruption or curtailment of trade or diplomatic relations between Israel and its trading partners as a result thereof could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Some of our employees in Israel are obligated to perform annual reserve duty in the Israeli military for several days, and in some cases more, of annual military reserve duty each year until they reach the age of 40 (or older, for reservists who are military officers or who have certain occupations) and are subject to being called for additional active duty under emergency circumstances. In response to increased tension and hostilities, there have been occasional call-ups of military reservists, and it is possible that there will be additional call-ups in the future. For example, as a result of Israel’sthe current war against Hamasconflicts in the Gaza StripStrip, Northern Israel, Lebanon, Iran and tensionsthe withbroader Hezbollah in northern Israel,region, as of JanuaryFebruary 31,3, 20252026 approximately 3.7%3.3% of our employees have been called to reserve duty in the Israel Defense Forces. To date, our operations have not been materially affected. See “— Conditions in Israel affect our operations and may limit our ability to produce and sell our solutions.” We cannot predict the full impact of these conditions on us in the future, particularly if emergency circumstances or an escalation in the political situation occurs. If many of our employees are called for active duty, our operations in Israel and our business may not be able to function at full capacity, and our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be adversely affected.
The dual class structure of our common stock has the effect of concentrating voting control with Intel, and Intel will beneficially ownowns shares of our Class A and Class B common stock, representing a majority of the shares of our common stock and approximately 98.6%97.3% of the voting power of our outstanding common stock as of December 28,27, 2024.2025. This will limit or preclude your ability to influence corporate matters.
Our Class B common stock has ten votes per share, and our Class A common stock has one vote per share. Because of the 10-to-1 voting ratio between our Class B common stock and our Class A common stock, Intel, which is the beneficial holder of 711,500,00050,000,000 shares of Class A common stock and 597,768,015 shares of Class B common stock, beneficially owns approximately 98.6%97.3% of the voting power of our outstanding common stock as of December 28,27, 2024.2025. Due to the issuance of shares of Class A common stock in connection with the acquisition of Mentee Robotics, Intel beneficially owns approximately 77.0% of our outstanding common stock and 96.9% of the voting power of our outstanding common stock as of February 3, 2026. Because Intel beneficially holds significantly more than a majority of the combined voting power of our common stock, it is able to control all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval.
●Certain of our directors may have conflicts of interest. Each of Patrick Bombach, ChristineNaga Pambianchi,Chandrasekaran, and SafDavid Yeboah-AmankwahZinsner serves both ason our directorBoard of Directors and in a senior management role at Intel. In addition, Frank D. Yeary serves both as our director and as Interim Executive Chair and a director of Intel. Such directors owe fiduciary duties to our company pursuant to Delaware law, but these relationships could create, or appear to create, conflicts of interest when these persons are faced with decisions with potentially different implications for Intel and us.
●Developing business relationships with Intel’s competitors. We maymay, from time to timetime, partner with, purchase from, and sell to a number of companies that compete with Intel. These companies may be less willing or unwilling to develop and maintain relationships with us, and may favor our competitors or may view us as competitors, because of our relationship with Intel.
●Limited license from Intel for certain technology related to radar. Intel has granted us a limited license for sensitive core technology relating to radar pursuant to a Technology and Services Agreement. The license is limited to the development of a specific type of radar for specific applications. Any radar products which do not comply with this definition will require a separate license from Intel, at Intel’s discretion. Intellectual property developed under the agreement, either solely or jointly with Intel, regarding the radar technology, except for certain rights to specifically identified radar technology which is developed solely by us following the Mobileye IPO, will be assigned by us to Intel. As a resultresult, we will not own most new radar intellectual property, even if it is developed solely by us. If we are unable to continue to use or license sensitive core technology related to radar from Intel, we may not be able to secure alternatives in a timely manner, or at all, and our ability to remain competitive would be harmed, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Business — If we are unable to develop and introduce new solutions and improve existing solutions in a cost-effective and timely manner, then our competitive position would be negatively impacted and our business, results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected” and “Risk Factors — Risks Related to our Intellectual Property Rights — We depend on licenses for certain technologies from third parties, some of which require us to pay royalties, and our inability to use such technologies in the future would harm our ability to remain competitive.”
We are licensed to sell the radar products only for ADAS and AV solutions for automobiles and to certain types of customers (Tier 1s, OEMs, MaaS). The Technology and Services Agreement has a term of two years,years and will automatically renew for one-year renewal periods, unless the agreement is terminated for a party’s material breach, a party’s bankruptcy or insolvency, or advance notice of nonrenewal is given, however, termination of the agreement does not affect certain licenses granted to us by Intel in respect of the radar product. In addition, the agreement includes limitations on our ability (except after review and approval by Intel) to file a patent application based on or using the radar intellectual property licensed to us under the agreement, or information in Intel’s radar patents during the term of the agreement and for five years after the completion of the development of the last Mobileye sensor product.
Although we entered into the Amended and Restated Tax Sharing Agreement with Intel under which our tax liabilities effectively will be determined based upon, subject to certain assumptions, our and/or our subsidiaries’ assets and activities, we nonetheless could be held liable for the tax liabilities of other members of any consolidated, combined or unitary tax group of Intel and/or its subsidiaries.subsidiaries for periods prior to July 12, 2025.
We havewere historically been included in Intel’s consolidated group (the “Consolidated Group”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes, as well as in certain consolidated, combined, or unitary groups that include Intel and/or certain of its subsidiaries for state and local income tax purposes (each, a “Combined Group”). We entered into the Tax Sharing Agreement with Intel inIn connection with the Mobileye IPO.IPO, we entered into a tax sharing agreement with Intel, which was amended and restated on August 14, 2024 (the “Amended and Restated Tax Sharing Agreement”). Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Tax Sharing Agreement, we generally arewere required to make payments to Intel such that, with respect to tax returns for any taxable period in which we or any of our subsidiaries arewere included in the Consolidated Group or any Combined Group, the amount of taxes to be paid by us willwould be determined by computing the excess (if any) of any taxes due on any such return over the amount that would otherwise be due if such return were recomputed by excluding us and/or our included subsidiaries.
As a result of changes in Intel’s ownership of our outstanding common stock due to the Secondary Offering, Share Repurchase and Conversion (each as defined in the MD&A), we were deconsolidated from Intel’s U.S. domestic consolidated income tax return effective July 11, 2025 (the “Tax Deconsolidation”). As a result of the Tax Deconsolidation, starting on July 12, 2025, the computation of cash payable between the Company and Intel, under the Amended and Restated Tax Sharing Agreement, is no longer applicable with respect to U.S. federal and applicable state income taxes. However, other obligations of the parties under the Amended and Restated Tax Sharing Agreement remain in effect. We havewere previously been included in the Consolidated Group for theperiods mostprior recentto annualJuly period12, 2025 and expectthereafter tono longer will be included in the Consolidated Group going forward. Each member of a consolidated group during any part of a consolidated return year is jointly and severally liable for tax on the consolidated return of such year and for any subsequently determined deficiency thereon. Similarly, in some jurisdictions, each member of a consolidated, combined or unitary group for state, local, or foreign income tax purposes is jointly and severally liable for the state, local, or foreign income tax liability of each other member of the consolidated, combined or unitary group. Accordingly, for any period in which we are included in the Consolidated Group or any Combined Group, we could be liable in the event that any income tax liability was incurred, but not discharged, by any other member of any such group.
As a result of the Tax Deconsolidation, we are now solely responsible for the preparation, filing and payment of our U.S. federal and applicable state income taxes on a standalone basis. This transition may increase the complexity of our tax compliance and reporting obligations and require additional internal controls, systems, personnel and external advisory support.
Under current U.S. federal income tax law, in order to consummate a tax-free spin-off of our stock, Intel would need to have beneficial ownership of our stock representing at least 80% of the total voting power and 80% of each class of non-voting capital stock. Nevertheless, if Intel were to decide to pursue a possible spin-off, we have agreed to cooperate with Intel and to take any and all actions reasonably requested by Intel in connection with such a transaction. Our rights, responsibilities and obligations with respect to any possible spin-off are set forth in the Master Transaction Agreement and Amended and Restated Tax Sharing Agreement. For example, in the event Intel completes a spin-off, we have agreed not to take certain actions, such as certain asset sales or contributions, mergers, stock issuances, or stock sales within the two years following the spin-off without first obtaining the opinion of tax counsel or an IRS ruling to the effect that such actions will not result in the spin-off failing to qualify as a tax-free spin-off. Additionally, under our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, until the first date on which Intel ceases to beneficially own 20% or more of the outstanding shares of our common stock, the prior affirmative vote or written consent of Intel, as the holder of the Class B common stock, is required in order to authorize us to issue any stock or other equity securities except to our subsidiaries or pursuant to our employee benefit plans limited to a share reserve of 5% of the outstanding number of shares of our common stock on the immediately preceding December 31. Intel’s intention to retain its ability to effectuate a tax-free spin-off of our stock may cause Intel to decide not to consent to such issuances. See “— Certain corporate actions by us would require the prior consent of Intel, and there can be no guarantee that Intel will consent to such matters, even if they are in our best interests.” These requirements could prevent us from pursuing opportunities to raise capital, effectuate acquisitions, or provide equity incentives to our employees, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
The ongoing compliance requirements of being a public company may strain our resources and divert management’s attention.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Secondary Offering, Share Repurchase, Option and Conversion”
New heading “Acquisition of Mentee Robotics”
New heading “Comparison of the years ended December 27, 2025 and December 28, 2024”
New heading “Cost of Revenue”
New heading “Goodwill Impairment”
New heading “Financial Income (expense), net”
New heading “2024 Goodwill Impairment Test”
New heading “2025 Goodwill Impairment Test”
Removed heading “Comparison of the years ended December 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022”
Removed heading “Interest Income (Expenses) with related party, net and Other Financial Income (expense), net”
Largest changes
“Trade policies, sanctions and import and export controls. Trade policies, sanctions and import and export controls. Trade policies and international disputes at times result in increased tariffs, trade barriers and other restrictions, which can increase our manufacturing costs, make our solutions less competitive, reduce demand for our solutions, limit our ability to sell to certain customers, limit our ability to procure raw components or raw materials or impede or slow the movement of our goods across borders. …”see in full comparison
“During 2025, the United States implemented a series of broad-based and sector-specific tariffs affecting passenger vehicles, automotive components and other industrial inputs, as well as country-specific tariff regimes and reciprocal trade measures. These actions were accompanied by ongoing bilateral and multilateral negotiations, interim trade agreements, pauses, delays and retaliatory measures by certain countries, resulting in significant uncertainty regarding the scope, timing and duration of applicable tariffs and export controls. …”see in full comparison
“The Share Purchase Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants of the Company, Mobileye Vision Technologies Ltd. and Mentee Robotics, certain of which (except for the representations and warranties of the Company) shall survive the closing of the Acquisition. The shareholders of Mentee Robotics have agreed to indemnify the Company and Mobileye Vision Technologies Ltd. for certain breaches of representations, warranties and covenants.”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (126)
Our financial data for periods ending or as of dates prior to the completion of the Mobileye IPO have been derived from the consolidated financial statements and accounting records of Intel using the historical results of operations and the historical basis of assets and liabilities. The financial data herein includes costs of our business, which may not, however, reflect the expenses we would have incurred as a stand-alone company for the periods presented. Following the completion of the Mobileye IPO, the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
As of December 28,27, 2024,2025, our solutions had been installed in approximately 12001,400 vehicle models (including local country, year, and other vehicle model variations), and our SoCs had been deployed in overmore 200than 230 million vehicles. We are actively working with more than 50 OEMs worldwide on the implementation of our ADAS solutions. For the year ended December 28,27, 2024,2025, we shipped approximately 29.035.7 million of our systems, of which the substantial majority were EyeQ™ SoCs. This represents an increase from the approximately 29.0 million of our systems that we shipped in 2024 and a decrease from the approximately 37.4 million of our systems that we shipped in 2023 and approximately 33.7 million of our systems that we shipped in 2022, primarily due to a significant drawdown of excess inventory at our Tier 1 customers and a reduction in volumes shipped to China in 2024.2023.
We were founded in Israel in 1999. Our co-founder, Professor Amnon Shashua, is our President and Chief Executive Officer. In 2014, we completed an initial public offering as a foreign private issuer and traded under the symbol “MBLY” on the New York Stock Exchange. Intel acquired Mobileye for $15.3 billion in 2017, after which we became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intel. We completed the Reorganization and Mobileye IPO in October 2022.
Secondary Offering, Share Repurchase, Option and Conversion
On July 9, 2025, the Company announced the pricing of a public secondary offering of 50,000,000 shares of Class A common stock (which shares were received upon the conversion of 50,000,000 shares of Class B common stock into Class A common stock) by Intel at a public offering price of $16.50 per share (the “Secondary Offering”), with Intel granting the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 7,500,000 shares of Class A common stock (the “Option”). The Secondary Offering closed on July 11, 2025.
In connection with and conditional upon the closing of the Secondary Offering, on July 11, 2025 the Company purchased from Intel 6,231,985 shares of Class A common stock (which shares were received upon the conversion of 6,231,985 shares of Class B common stock into Class A common stock) at a price of $16.04625 share, which is equal to the per share purchase price paid by the underwriters in the Secondary Offering pursuant to a share repurchase agreement with Intel (the “Share Repurchase”). The aggregate consideration paid by the Company for the Share Repurchase was $100 million. Upon closing of the Share Repurchase, the Company cancelled and retired the 6,231,985 shares of Class A common stock acquired pursuant to the Share Repurchase.
Following the closing of the Share Repurchase, the underwriters exercised the Option (which shares were received upon the conversion of 7,500,000 shares of Class B common stock into Class A common stock), which closed on July 11, 2025. The Company did not sell any shares of Class A common stock in the Secondary Offering or in respect of the exercise of the Option, and did not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares offered by Intel in each instance.
In addition to and conditional upon the closing of the Secondary Offering, Intel voluntarily converted pursuant to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation an additional 50,000,000 shares of Class B common stock to Class A common stock (the “Conversion”). The shares issued to Intel pursuant to the Conversion were issued pursuant to an exemption from registration pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933. The Company received no proceeds from issuance of shares in the Conversion.
The Company paid the costs associated with the registration of shares in connection with the Secondary Offering and the Option, other than underwriting discounts, fees and commissions.
Upon completion of the Secondary Offering, Share Repurchase, Option and Conversion, Intel continues to directly or indirectly hold all of the Class B common stock of Mobileye as well as 50,000,000 shares of Class A common stock, which as of December 27, 2025, together represent approximately 79.5% of our outstanding common stock and 97.3% of the voting power of our common stock. Due to the issuance of shares of Class A common stock in connection with the Acquisition (as defined below), Intel beneficially owns approximately 77.0% of our outstanding common stock and 96.9% of the voting power of our outstanding common stock as of February 3, 2026.
Acquisition of Mentee Robotics
On February 3, 2026, the Company and Mobileye Vision Technologies Ltd. (a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of the Company) acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding stock of Mentee Robotics Ltd. (“Mentee Robotics” and such transaction, the “Acquisition”), pursuant to a share purchase agreement dated as of January 5, 2026, by and among the Company, Mobileye Vision Technologies Ltd., Mentee Robotics, the shareholders of Mentee Robotics, and Shareholder Representative Services LLC, as the exclusive representative of the Mentee Robotics shareholders.
The Acquisition was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”), acting on the recommendation of a strategic transaction committee consisting of four disinterested directors (two of whom are independent). The Audit Committee of the Board also approved the Acquisition pursuant to the Company’s Related Persons Transaction Policy. Intel, as the sole beneficial holder of the Company’s issued and outstanding Class B common stock, also approved the Acquisition pursuant to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. Prof. Amnon Shashua recused himself from the Board’s consideration and approval of the Acquisition. Prof. Shashua, President and CEO of the Company, is the Chairman, Co-Founder and a significant shareholder of Mentee Robotics, and Prof. Shai Shalev-Shwartz, Chief Technology Officer of the Company, is Co-Founder and a significant shareholder of Mentee Robotics (Prof. Shalev-Shwartz, together with Prof. Shashua and Prof. Lior Wolf, the Chief Executive Officer and a Co-Founder of Mentee Robotics, the “Mentee Founders”). In addition, Prof. Shashua’s son and son-in-law, are both employees of Mentee Robotics and each held vested and unvested options issued pursuant to Mentee Robotics’ employee incentive plan and therefore received some consideration pursuant to the terms of the Share Purchase Agreement.
The Share Purchase Agreement provided for an aggregate purchase price of $900 million, which consisted of (i) approximately $612 million in cash (subject to certain adjustments,) and (ii) 26,279,824 shares of Class A common stock of the Company. The entirety of such Class A common stock was allocated to the Mentee Founders (the “Aggregate Stock Consideration”). 10% of the Aggregate Stock Consideration is subject to a six-month lock-up period pursuant to a Lock-Up Agreement. The remaining 90% of the Aggregate Stock Consideration was deposited with a deferred consideration trustee and will be released in equal portions twenty-four and forty-eight months after the closing date on February 3, 2026, subject to continued employment, or under certain circumstances affiliation, with the Company and its subsidiaries. Prof. Shashua received 37.83% of the total consideration, valued at approximately $341 million, to be paid evenly in cash and the Company’s Class A Stock, and Prof. Shalev-Shwartz received 13.07% of the total consideration, valued at approximately $118 million, to be paid evenly in cash and the Company’s Class A common stock.
At the closing, $95 million of the purchase price was deposited with an escrow agent (provided that with respect to Mentee Founders, 50% of their pro rata portion of the escrow was deposited in the form of Class A common stock) to secure the post-closing purchase price adjustments and certain indemnification obligations of the shareholders of Mentee Robotics.
Pursuant to the Share Purchase Agreement, (i) all vested options to acquire shares of Mentee Robotics (each option, a “Mentee Option”) and 20% of unvested Mentee Options were cancelled and converted into the right to receive a portion of the cash consideration based on the intrinsic value of such Mentee Options at the purchase price and (ii) all remaining unvested Mentee Options were cancelled and converted into the right to receive a number of unvested RSUs of the Company calculated based on the volume weighted average of the closing sale prices for the Company’s Class A common stock over the thirty (30) Trading Days ending immediately prior to February 3, 2026 and with a value equal to the intrinsic value of such Mentee Options at the purchase price.
The Share Purchase Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants of the Company, Mobileye Vision Technologies Ltd. and Mentee Robotics, certain of which (except for the representations and warranties of the Company) shall survive the closing of the Acquisition. The shareholders of Mentee Robotics have agreed to indemnify the Company and Mobileye Vision Technologies Ltd. for certain breaches of representations, warranties and covenants.
We currently derive substantially all of our revenue from our commercially deployed ADAS solutions, including our Premium ADAS solutions. InWe are now approaching the future,start of production of an advanced set of solutions, including Mobileye Surround ADAS™, Mobileye SuperVision™, Mobileye Chauffeur™ and Mobileye Drive™. These solutions are propelled by our nextEyeQ™6 generationSOC ofand subsequent EyeQ™ SoCs, includinggenerations, our EyeQ™6next-generation SoC,software our Compound AI system architecture, including True Redundancy™, our surround computer vision Mobileye SuperVision™ solution,solutions, and our software-defined imaging radars,radars. weWe believeexpect thatthese wesolutions willwill, beover positionedtime, meaningfully contribute to deliverchanges anin autonomousour drivingmix solutionof thatrevenue canand enableresult thein massbroader adoption of AV.premium ADAS and AV products by our customers.
We partner with STMicroelectronics, a leading supplier and innovator of semiconductor devices for automotive applications, in manufacturing, design, and research and development. We have co-developed six generations of our automotive grade SoC, EyeQ™, with STMicroelectronics including EyeQ™5 and EyeQ™6. We have also established relationships with several suppliers, such as Quanta Computer, to develop and assemble our ECUs, including the design for our Mobileye SuperVision™, which includes our EyeQ™5 and EyeQ™6 SoCs manufactured by STMicroelectronics. As part of an effort to establish redundancy and better control of our supply chain, we have sought additional qualified suppliers, and we have recently entered into an agreement with TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd.) pursuant to which it will manufacture components of our imaging radar and some of our future generations of our EyeQ™ product, and potentially other future products.
Our close partnership with Intel exists on multiple fronts. As a result of our relationship with Intel, we have access to unique and differentiating technologies. For example, we may license certain technologies from Intel that support the design and development of our software-defined imaging radar, including Intel’s mmWave technologies. Additionally, we intend to explore a collaboration with Intel on a technology platform to integrate our EyeQ™ SoC with Intel’s market leading central compute capability, with plans to utilize Intel Foundry Services’ advanced packaging capabilities. This potential platform is intended to enable functions essential to safety, entertainment, and cloud connectivity. Intel’s strength in government affairs and policy development around the world will continue to be of significant value to us as we collaborate with regulators who are preparing frameworks to enable commercial deployment of AVs.
Global demand for automotive vehicles. Our business performance is related to global automotive sales and automotive vehicle production by our OEM customers. Economic conditions in North America, Europe and Asia can have a large impact on the production volume of new vehicles, and, accordingly, have an impact on our revenue. Our OEM customers’ production can vary from period to period due to global demand, market conditions and competitive conditions, geopolitical issues including trade restrictions and tariffs, as well as other factors. For example, towards the end of the first half of 2024, global automotive production forecasts weakened, which disproportionately impacted our core customers, primarily due to their continued market share losses in China. We cannot be certain of the severity and length of the continued volatility in the global automotive market, including macro factors impacting our sales to OEMs in China, and the extent of the adverse effect that such volatility could have on our results of operations, financial condition and business in the long term. While automotive production has now recovered to approximately 2019 levels, current uncertain economic conditions and inflation may contribute to a reduction in consumer demand. In addition to economic conditions, in prior periods, including during the supply chain crisis and semi-conductor shortage of 2021 and 2022, certain Tier 1 customers increased their orders for components and parts, including our solutions, to counteract the impact of supply chain shortages for auto parts. As a result, some demand for our solutions and the corresponding revenue from these customers were shifted to earlier time periods than otherwise would have occurred absent a general supply chain shortage and inflationary environment. As a result of our standard planning process for 2024, including discussions with our Tier 1 customers, we became aware in late 2023 of significant excess inventory at our customers. This as well as lower than expected production at certain OEMs during 2023 led to the decision by our Tier 1 customers to prioritize in the first quarter of 2024 the utilization of excess inventory on hand before using new shipments to meet the demand of OEMs. We estimate our customers used the vast majority of this excess customer inventory in 2024 in accordance with our expectations, but there is no guarantee that orders will remain normalized or that our customers won’t build up excess inventory in the future. Further, recent increased demand for semi-conductor and other components has resulted in component shortages, price increases and longer order lead times, which may increase the pricing of our solutions and/or our ability to meet our customers’ demand. Certain Tier 1 customers may increase their orders for our solutions to counteract these component shortages and any resulting price increases or other impacts, causing some demand for our solutions and the corresponding revenue to be shifted to earlier time period than otherwise would have occurred. ADAS volumes have grown faster in recent years than the overall automotive market as ADAS penetration rates have increased, and we believe that we will continue to benefit from that trend. Our revenue of $1,654$1,894 million for the year ended December 28,27, 20242025 was downup 20%15% year-over-year, primarily due to the aforementioned utilizationnormalization of excess inventory by our Tier 1 customers that was previously used to satisfy demand during the first half of 2024 and a reduction in volumes shipped to China OEMs in 2024. Continued or future constraints on global automotive production resulting from the effects of economic uncertainty, both global and in specific markets in which we operate, may be a limiting factor on our ability to increase revenue. We expect to continue to capitalize on our strong and collaborative relationships with OEMs and Tier 1s to expand our presence in key markets and capture the long-term growth opportunities in those markets.
Acquisition and integration of new technologies and expansion into adjacent markets. Our results of operations may be affected by our ability to successfully integrate acquired businesses and technologies and to effectively allocate resources to new areas of development. On February 3, 2026, we acquired Mentee Robotics, a privately held Israeli company focused on humanoid robotics, which we expect to operate as an independent subsidiary in the short to medium term. The integration of Mentee Robotics’ personnel, technology and operations may require significant management attention, capital investment and operating expenses, and we may not realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition on the expected timeline or at all. Humanoid robotics is a nascent and rapidly evolving area characterized by significant technical complexity, long development timelines, potentially high capital requirements, uncertain customer demand and evolving regulatory and safety frameworks. Our investment in this area may result in increased research and development and operating expenses and may divert resources from our core ADAS and autonomous driving initiatives. In addition, the timing and extent of commercialization of humanoid robotics solutions remains uncertain with respect to scalability, economic viability and regulatory approval. As a result, our expansion into adjacent markets, including through the acquisition of Mentee Robotics, may adversely affect our results of operations, margins and cash flows, particularly in the near to medium term.
Trade policies, sanctions and import and export controls. Trade policies, sanctions and import and export controls. Trade policies and international disputes at times result in increased tariffs, trade barriers and other restrictions, which can increase our manufacturing costs, make our solutions less competitive, reduce demand for our solutions, limit our ability to sell to certain customers, limit our ability to procure raw components or raw materials or impede or slow the movement of our goods across borders. In addition, tariffs could lead to higher prices for finished automobiles, which would reduce demand for automobiles and thus the market for our products.
During 2025, the United States implemented a series of broad-based and sector-specific tariffs affecting passenger vehicles, automotive components and other industrial inputs, as well as country-specific tariff regimes and reciprocal trade measures. These actions were accompanied by ongoing bilateral and multilateral negotiations, interim trade agreements, pauses, delays and retaliatory measures by certain countries, resulting in significant uncertainty regarding the scope, timing and duration of applicable tariffs and export controls. In addition, sector-specific measures announced during 2025, including tariffs on certain raw materials, and export controls affecting the semiconductor supply chain, have increased complexity and risk across global automotive and technology markets.
As of the date of this report, there remains a high degree of uncertainty surrounding U.S. trade policy, how it will be implemented, how other countries will react, and how it will ultimately impact our industry and business. For example, our customers may have shifted or will shift orders for components and parts, including our solutions, adjust sourcing strategies or modify productions schedules, which could shift demand for our solutions and corresponding revenue between periods. While we continually evaluate changes in U.S. trade policy and global reactions thereto, as well as our ability to mitigate their impact, these developments may negatively impact our customers, our results of operations and our business.
Design wins with new and existing customers. Global OEMs are continuously looking for innovative ways to improve the customer appeal and safety of their vehicles. Additional program design wins for production programs are important to our future revenue growth. However, the revenue generated by each design win and the time necessary to achieve a design win can vary significantly. To achieve program design wins, we must maintain our technological leadership and continue to deliver differentiated solutions versus our competition, including in-house technologies developed by our customers, through investment in research and development. Together with Tier 1 automotive suppliers, we work closely with OEMs to understand their solution requirements and have built close long-term relationships with them extending across multiple generations of EyeQ™ products, though there is no guarantee that our customers will purchase our solutions in any certain quantity or at any certain price even after we achieve design wins. For example, in the third quarter of 2024 Zeekr announced their decision to utilize their in-house system instead of SuperVision™ for at least a major portion of product for their 001 model going forward.
Investment in technology leadership and product development. We believe our ability to continue to develop and design highly advanced and cost-efficient ADAS and AV solutions will position us to extend our technology leadership and encourage greater adoption of our solutions by enabling greater levels of autonomy. We also believe that our roadmap for future generations of EyeQ™ SoCs and advanced systems will ultimately power autonomous driving solutions. The EyeQ™ family design further enables scalable ECU architectures, from supporting a variety of ADAS solution architectures to hosting the full workload of autonomous driving, while meeting stringent cost and power efficiency requirements. We expect that our development of software-defined imaging radar will provide a significant cost advantage by eliminating the need for multiple high-cost lidars around the vehicle and require only a single front-facing lidar, significantly lowering the overall cost of the required sensors compared to solutions that use lidar centric or lidar-only systems.
Consumer adoption of our ADAS and autonomous driving solutions. Our financial performance is in part driven by public awareness and demand for ADAS solutions. Over time we expect autonomous driving solutions to contribute meaningfully to our revenue growth. As a result, consumers’ demand for, and willingness to adopt, ADAS and autonomous driving technologiestechnologies, including robotaxi services, will significantly impact our financial performance. We believe that our leadership position in ADAS positions us to continue to set the standard for advanced autonomous solutions and will help us benefit from increasing consumer confidence in and demand for autonomous technology over time.
The cost of input materials and manufacturing costs are significant factors affecting our gross margin. Material costs are affected by a variety of factors, including the availability of sufficient supply to meet market demand. For example, in late 2021, semiconductor fabrication costs increased as a result of a global supply shortage that began in 2020. We experienced increases in input costs in 2022 and 2023 as a result of supply chain shortages, including the global semiconductor shortage, and inflationary pressures. While we were largely successful in increasing our ASPs to reflect these cost increases, we experienced a reduction in percentage gross margin as a result of these cost increases. More recently, the AI industry has generated increased demand for components necessary for the production of our solutions, including EyeQ™ SoCs and ECUs for our SuperVision™, Mobileye Chauffeur™ and Mobileye Drive™ solutions. This new demand has resulted in and may continue to result in shortages of components necessary for our solutions and substantial increases in prices for such components. Our gross margin has been and may continue to be affected by our ability to offset these and any future cost increases through realizing pricing increases on our solutions and achieving decreases in other production costs. We work closely with STMicroelectronics, Quanta Computer and other suppliers on a continuous basis to manage material costs, increase yields and improve manufacturing, assembly, and test costs.
Supply and manufacturing capacity. Our solutions are dependent on the global semiconductor supply chain. The continued and timely supply of input materials, the availability of manufacturing capacity, and packaging and testing services at reasonable prices impact our ability to meet customer demand. Supply chain disruptions, shortages of raw material, such as wafers and substrates, and manufacturing limitations could limit our ability to meet customer demand and result in delayed, reduced, or canceled orders. During 2021 and 2022, the semiconductor industry experienced widespread shortages of substrates and other components and available foundry manufacturing capacity. We entered 2022 with significantly lower inventories of our EyeQ™ SoCs on our balance sheet as a result of the limited supply during 2021. Further, STMicroelectronics, our sole supplier of EyeQ™ SoCs, was not able to meet our demand for EyeQ™ SoCs during 2022, causing a further significant reduction in our company-owned inventory level. Starting in late 2022 and early 2023, such supply chain disruptions, raw material shortages and manufacturing limitations abated and during 2023, we successfully increased levels of EyeQ™ SoC inventory on hand, mitigating the potential for future supply constraints to cause a shortfall of chips. However, in the event of a reoccurrence of supply chain constraints, and subject to the duration and severity thereof, we may be required to operate with minimal or no inventory of EyeQ™ SoCs or SuperVision™ ECUs on hand. As a result, we are substantially reliant on timely shipments of EyeQ™ SoCs from STMicroelectronics and ECUs from Quanta Computer (or other suppliers) and may in the future become reliant on additional suppliers such as TSMC, to fulfill customer orders and if such a shortfall of chips or ECUs were to occur, we may be unable to offset future supply constraints through the use of inventory on hand. Further, in 2025 and in 2026 the AI industry has generated increased demand for components necessary for the production of our solutions, including EyeQ™ SoCs and ECUs for our SuperVision™, Mobileye Chauffeur™ and Mobileye Drive™ solutions. This new demand has resulted in and may continue to result in shortages of components necessary for our solutions, substantial increases in prices for such components and suppliers requiring us to increase lead times and purchase greater quantities of such components in advance in order to ensure we secure sufficient supply. Such shortages of components, as well as the increases in pricing, order requirements and lead times, has and may continue to impact our ability to supply solutions to our customers in order to meet demand as well as impact OEMs’ ability to purchase our solutions. Our reliance on single or limited suppliers and vendors for certain components, equipment, and services and the aforementioned shortages of substrates and other components have led to increased supply chain risks and continue to stress our ability to meet the supply demands of our customers. To mitigate these supply chain constraints, management continues to monitor inventory levels on an ongoing basis. Although we cannot fully predict the length and the severity of the impact these pressures will have on a long-term basis, we do not anticipate that our current supply chain constraints would materially adversely affect our results of operations, capital resources, sales, profits, and liquidity on a long-term basis.
Public company expenses. As a recently public company, we have implemented and will continue to implement additional procedures and processes for the purpose of addressing the standards and requirements applicable to public companies. In particular, we expect our accounting, legal and personnel-related expenses to increase as we continue to establish more comprehensive compliance and governance functions and hire additional personnel to support such functions, maintain and review internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and prepare and distribute periodic reports in accordance with SEC rules. Our financial statements will reflect the impact of these expenses. We also expect the costs of our insurance, including directors’ and officers’ insurance and insurance coverage for AV activity, to increase as a result of higher premiums.
Equity compensation expenses. In addition, in connection with the Mobileye IPO, we established an equity incentive plan for purposes of granting share-based compensation awards to certain members of our senior management, to our non-employee directors and to employees, to incentivize their performance and align their interests with ours. Historically, grants of share-based compensation to our employees were made pursuant to Intel’s employee equity incentive plans, and such historical grants will continue to be based on their original vesting schedules. Equity compensation has been, and will continue to be, an important part of our future compensation strategy and a significant component of our future expenses, which we expect to increase over time.
We expect our general and administrative expenses to moderately increase in absolute dollars but to decrease as a percentage of total revenue as our business grows. The expected increase is mainly associated with the costs related to being a public company, including the need to hire more personnel to support compliance with SEC rules and regulations and the applicable provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as increased premiums for directors’ and officers’ insurance and the increased use of share-based compensation for general and administrative personnel.
Interest Income (Expense) with related party, net and Other Financial Income (Expense), net
On April 21, 2022, we and Intel entered into a loan agreement whereby we issued a promissory note to Intel in an aggregate principal amount of $3.5 billion (the “Dividend Note”). The Dividend Note accrues interest at a rate equal to 1.26% per annum. In November 2022, we used approximately $0.9 billion out of the net proceeds of the Mobileye IPO to repay a portion of the indebtedness under the Dividend Note and Intel contributed to Mobileye the remaining portion of the Dividend Note (plus related accrued interest) such that no amounts under the Dividend Note remain owed by us to Intel.
In the years ended December 28, 2024 and December 30, 2023, we had no interest income (expense) with related party since the outstanding balance of both the Dividend Note and a loan to Intel were zero as of December 31, 2022. In the year ended December 31, 2022, we incurred a net interest expense with related party of $(6) million which mainly relates to accrued interest on the Dividend Note to Intel.
Other financialFinancial income (expense), net, consists primarily of income related to investments in money market funds, as well as income from short term deposits, fair value revaluation of equity investments and fluctuations in value due to foreign exchange differences between our monetary assets and liabilities denominated in New Israeli Shekels and to a much lesser extent, the Euro, the Chinese Yuan, the Japanese Yen, and other currencies.
Benefit (provision) for income taxes consists primarily of income taxes related to the United States, Israel and other foreign jurisdictions in which we conduct business. We also have incurred deferred tax liabilities with respect to tax amortization of certain acquired intangible assets. We are eligible for certain tax benefits in Israel under the Investment Law, at a reduced tax rate, subject to specified terms. In addition, in 2021, the OECD announced an Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting including Pillar Two Model Rules defining the global minimum tax in 2021,tax, which calls for the taxation of large multinational corporations at a minimum rate of 15%. Subsequently, multiple sets of administrative guidance have been issued. Many non-US tax jurisdictions have either recently enacted legislation to adopt certain components of the Pillar Two Model Rules beginning in 2024 (including the European Union Member States), with the adoption of additional components in later years, or announced their plans to enact legislation in future years. In Israel, the regulations of Pillar Two Model Rules will become effective for tax years beginning after January 1, 2026. The Pillar Two Model Rules did not have a material effect on our income tax provision for the 2025 fiscal year. We are continuing to evaluate the impacts of enacted legislation and pending legislation to enact Pillar Two Model Rules in the non-US tax jurisdictions in which we operate. The Company is a constituent entity of its Parent for Pillar Two Model Rules purposes.
In July 2025, the United States enacted tax reform through the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”). Included in this legislation are provisions that allow for the immediate expensing of research and development costs conducted in the United States, immediate expensing of certain capital expenditures, and other changes to the U.S. taxation of profits derived from foreign operations. The Company is monitoring developments related to the implementation of the OBBBA and any additional guidance issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, the Internal Revenue Service, or other standard-setting bodies that may affect the Company’s accounting for income taxes. Based on information available at the end of the reporting period and management’s assessment of that information, the OBBBA does not have and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
During the years presented in our consolidated financial statements, certain components of our business operations were included in the consolidated U.S. tax return filed by Intel. We also file certain foreign income tax returns on a separate basis, distinct from Intel. TheFollowing the Secondary Offering, which resulted in the Tax Deconsolidation (see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements), the Company is no longer included in Intel’s U.S. federal consolidated income tax return and will be filing its own U.S. federal income tax returns for periods beginning July 12, 2025 onwards. Since prior to the Tax Deconsolidation, the Company’s income tax provision included in our consolidated financial statements has beenwas calculated using the separate return methodmethod, as if wethe Company had filed ourits own taxU.S. returns. We present tax loss and tax credit carry-forward amounts that have not been utilized by Intel only to the extent such tax attributes can be claimed as a benefit consistent with our separate tax return method approach. The use of the separate return method may result in differences between ourfederal income tax provisionreturns, comparedthe toTax Intel’sDeconsolidation consolidatedevent incomedoes not have a material impact on the Company’s tax provision.provision for the year ended December 27, 2025.
Realization of deferred tax assets is based on our judgment and various factors including reversal of deferred tax liabilities, the ability to generate future taxable income in jurisdictions where such assets have arisen, and potential tax planning strategies. The valuation allowance for the years presented in our consolidated financial statements primarily relates to U.S. branch deferred tax assets not currently expected to be realized given that we have sustained recent losses based on the separate return method.losses.
Certain net operating losses and tax credit carry-forward tax attributes generated by the Company thatand reflected in these consolidated financial statements have been utilized as part of Intel’s consolidated income tax return filings,filings but have not been utilized byin the Companyperiods underprior to the separateTax returnDeconsolidation. methodThe approach,Company’s post Tax Deconsolidation net operating loss carryforwards have been reflected in thethese consolidated financial statements becauseand the Company will recognize a benefit basedfor onthese thenet separateoperating return methodlosses when determined to be realizable.
Comparison of the years ended December 27, 2025 and December 28, 2024
In 2025, revenue was $1,894 million, up $240 million, or 15%, compared to 2024. This increase in revenue was primarily due to an increase of $308 million, or 22%, in EyeQ™ SoC revenue attributable mainly to a 23% increase in volume, resulting mainly from the normalization of excess inventory by our Tier 1 customers that was previously used to satisfy demand during the first half of 2024. This was slightly offset by a decrease in SuperVision™ related revenue. Average System Price, calculated as the sum of revenue related to EyeQ™ and SuperVision™ systems divided by the number of systems delivered, decreased by 6% mainly due to lower percentage of SuperVision™ related revenue as compared to 2024.
Cost of Revenue
In 2025, our cost of revenue increased by $77 million, or 8%, compared to 2024. This increase was primarily due to an increase of $81 million in manufacturing costs relating primarily to the increase in sales of our EyeQ™ SoC which was partially offset by the decrease in sales of SuperVision™ systems.
In 2025, our gross profit increased by $163 million, or 22%, compared to 2024. This increase was primarily due to the increase in revenue from sales of EyeQ™ systems, which was slightly offset by the decrease in sales of SuperVision™ systems.
Our gross margin increased from 45% during 2024, to 48% during 2025. This increase was primarily due to the lower impact of amortization of intangible assets as a percentage of revenue as well as an increase in the percentage of revenue attributable to EyeQ™ SoCs.
Research and development expenses, net, in 2025, increased by $68 million, or 6%, compared to 2024. This increase was primarily due to an increase in payroll and related expenses, resulting from an increase in average research and development headcount of 147 employees and the costs related to the reduction in workforce implemented during the fourth quarter of 2025. This was partially offset by a decrease in direct expenses including professional services mostly related to the wind-down of the Lidar R&D Unit that took place in 2024, in addition to lower share-based compensation.
Sales and marketing expenses, in 2025, decreased by $5 million, or 4%, compared to 2024, mainly due to a decrease in payroll and related expenses due to the winding down of the Aftermarket Solutions Unit that took place in 2024, in addition to a decrease in amortization of intangible assets.
General and administrative expenses in 2025 increased by $10 million, or 14%, compared to 2024. This increase was mainly due to an increase in legal and corporate expenses in addition to an increase in share-based compensation expenses.
Goodwill Impairment
Goodwill impairment expenses were zero in 2025 and $2,695 million in 2024. During the third quarter of 2024, the Company performed an interim quantitative goodwill impairment analysis for the “Mobileye” reporting unit, resulting in a non-cash impairment loss. For further details, see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report.
Financial Income (expense), net
Financial income (expense) net in 2025, was $63 million compared to $62 million in 2024. This increase was mainly due to an increase in interest earned on short term bank deposits, partially offset by a decrease in interest earned on investments in money market funds and an increase in exchange rate differences expenses.
In 2025, the provision for income tax was $(15) million, compared to a benefit for income tax of $73 million in 2024. This change is mainly due to the deferred tax effects of $82 million attributed to goodwill impairment of the Mobileye reporting unit which was recognized in the prior year period.
Our gross margin decreased from 50% during 2023, to 45% during 2024. This decrease was mainly due to a higher impact of amortization of intangible assets as a percentage of revenues, as well as the impact of higher EyeQ-relatedEyeQ™-related costs per unit due to mix effects.
Interest Income (expense) with Related Party, net and Other Financial Income (expenseExpense), net
Interest income (expense) with related party, net was zero in both 2024 and 2023.
Other financialFinancial income (expense), net in 2024, was $62 million compared to $49 million in 2023. This increase was mainly due to an increase in interest earned on short term bank deposits, a decrease in exchange rate differences expense and income from fair value revaluation of equity investments executed during 2024.
What changed in the latest 10-Q
Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors as disclosed in our 2025 Form 10-K. The risks described in the section entitled “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our 2025 Form 10-K could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations, and the trading price of our Class A common stock could decline. These risk factors do not identify all risks that we face. Our operations could also be affected by factors that are not presently known to us or that we currently consider to be immaterial to our operations. Due to risks and uncertainties, known and unknown, our past financial results may not be a reliable indicator of future performance and historical trends should not be used to anticipate results or trends in future periods. Refer also to the other information set forth elsewhere herein, including the sections entitled “Forward-Looking Statements”, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, and our Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements and related Notes thereto.
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (1)
There have been no material changes to the risk factors as disclosed in our 2025 Form 10-K. The risks described in the section entitled “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our 2025 Form 10-K could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations, and the trading price of our Class A common stock could decline. These risk factors do not identify all risks that we face. Our operations could also be affected by factors that are not presently known to us or that we currently consider to be immaterial to our operations. Due to risks and uncertainties, known and unknown, our past financial results may not be a reliable indicator of future performance and historical trends should not be used to anticipate results or trends in future periods. Refer also to the other information set forth elsewhere herein, including the sections entitled “Forward-Looking Statements”, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,Operations”, and our Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements and related Notes thereto.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
New heading “Research and Development Incentives”
Removed heading “Acquisition of Mentee Robotics”
Largest changes
“In the three months ended June 27, 2026 provision for income tax was $4 million, compared to $6 million in the three months ended June 28, 2025. The decrease of $2 million in tax provision was primarily due to the reduction in deferred tax liability resulting from the goodwill impairment to the Mobileye reporting unit which was recorded in the first quarter of 2026, partially offset by a lower loss before income taxes in foreign jurisdictions. …”see in full comparison
“●changes in regulation and trade policy, including increased tariffs, in regions in which we operate, including the U.S., Europe and China;”see in full comparison
“Benefit for income tax in the three months ended March 28, 2026, was $64 million compared to a provision for income tax of $(3) million in the three months ended March 29, 2025. This $67 million change is mainly due to the deferred tax effect of goodwill impairment to the Mobileye reporting unit.”see in full comparison
“Our Operating Loss increased from $191 million in the six months ended June 28, 2025 to $3,926 million in the six months ended June 27, 2026, mainly due to a goodwill impairment loss recognized in the first quarter of 2026.”see in full comparison
“Our Operating Loss increased by $3,779 million in the three months ended March 28, 2026 compared to the three months ended March 29, 2025, mainly due to the goodwill impairment loss recognized this quarter.”see in full comparison
“●sustained low levels of our share price and market capitalization as well as other factors may require further testing of our Mobileye reporting unit, which may result in an impairment of goodwill;”see in full comparison
Full comparison: every changed paragraph (87)
As of MarchJune 28,27, 2026, our solutions had been installed in approximately 1,400 vehicle models (including local country, year, and other vehicle model variations), and our System-on-Chips (“SoCs”) had been deployed in more than 248258 million vehicles. We are actively working with more than 50 Original Equipment Manufacturers (“OEMs”) worldwide on the implementation of our ADAS solutions. In the threesix months ended MarchJune 28,27, 2026, we shipped approximately 10.820.9 million of our systems, the substantial majority of which were EyeQTM SoCs. This represents an increase from the approximately 8.518.1 million of our systems that we shipped in the first threesix months ofended June 28, 2025.
On October 7, 2023, Hamas launched a series of attacks on civilian and military targets in Southern Israel and Central Israel, to which the Israel Defense Forces responded. In addition, Iran, Hezbollah and the Houthi movement attacked military and civilian targets in Israel, to which Israel responded, including through increased air and/or ground operations in Lebanon, Syria, Yemen and Iran. Following years of conflict in the region, on October 9, 2025, Israel, Hamas, the United States and other countries in the region agreed to a framework for a ceasefire in Gaza between Israel and Hamas. On February 28, 2026, the United States and Israel launched joint combat operations in Iran to which Iran and Hezbollah responded with ballistic missile and drone attacks on Israel as well as other countries and U.S. military bases in the region. On April 8, 2026,Although the United States and Iran agreedhave announced ceasefire and de-escalation arrangements from time to time, including a two-weekmemorandum ceasefire.of understanding entered into on June 17, 2026 that contemplates the termination of military operations on multiple fronts, hostilities have resumed and may continue or escalate. How long and how severe the current conflicts in Gaza, Northern Israel, Lebanon, Iran or the broader region last and become is unknown at this time and any continued clash among Israel, Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran or other countries or militant groups in the region may escalate in the future into a greater regional conflict. To date, our operations have not been materially affected, although as of AprilJuly 15, 2026 approximately 7.0%2.4% of our employees have been called to reserve duty in the Israel Defense Forces. However, since these are events beyond our control, their continuation or cessation may affect our expectations. We continue to monitor political and military developments closely and examine the consequences for our operations and assets.
Acquisition of Mentee Robotics
On February 3, 2026, the Company and Mobileye Vision Technologies Ltd. (a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of the Company) acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding stock of Mentee Robotics (such transaction, the “Acquisition”), pursuant to a share purchase agreement dated as of January 5, 2026, by and among the Company, Mobileye Vision Technologies Ltd., Mentee Robotics, the shareholders of Mentee Robotics, and Shareholder Representative Services LLC, as the exclusive representative of the Mentee Robotics shareholders. The Share Purchase Agreement provided for an aggregate purchase price of $900 million, which consisted of (i) approximately $612 million in cash (subject to certain adjustments,) and (ii) 26,279,824 shares of Class A common stock of the Company. The entirety of such Class A common stock was allocated to the founders of Mentee Robotics, which include Prof. Shashua, our President and CEO, and Prof. Shai Shalev-Shwartz, our Chief Technology Officer.
We currently derive substantially all of our revenue from our commercially deployed ADAS solutions, including our Premium ADAS solutions. We are now approaching the start of production of an advanced set of solutions, including Mobileye Surround ADAS™,ADASTM, Mobileye SuperVision™,SuperVisionTM, Mobileye Chauffeur™ChauffeurTM and Mobileye Drive™.DriveTM. These solutions are propelled by our EyeQTM6 SoC and subsequent EyeQTM generations, our next-generation software solutions, and our software-defined imaging radars. We expect these solutions will, over time, meaningfully contribute to changes in our mix of revenue and result in broader adoption of premium ADAS and AV products by our customers.
We partner with STMicroelectronics, a leading supplier and innovator of semiconductor devices for automotive applications, in manufacturing, design, and research and development. We have co-developed six generations of our automotive grade SoC, EyeQTM, with STMicroelectronics, including EyeQTM5 and EyeQTM6. We have also established relationships with several suppliers, such as Quanta Computer, to develop and assemble our ECUs, including the design for our Mobileye SuperVision™,SuperVisionTM, which includes our EyeQTM5 SoCs manufactured by STMicroelectronics. As part of an effort to establish redundancy and better control of our supply chain, we have sought additional qualified suppliers, and we have recently entered into an agreement with TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd.) pursuant to which it will manufacture components of our imaging radar and some of our future generations of our EyeQ™EyeQTM product, and potentially other future products.
Global demand for automotive vehicles. Our business performance is related to global automotive sales and automotive vehicle production by our OEM customers. Economic conditions in North America, Europe and Asia can have a large impact on the production volume of new vehicles, and, accordingly, have an impact on our revenue. Our OEM customers’ production can vary from period to period due to global demand, market conditions and competitive conditions, geopolitical issues including trade restrictions and tariffs, as well as other factors. For example, towards the end of the first half of 2024, global automotive production forecasts weakened, which disproportionately impacted our core customers, primarily due to their continued market share losses in China. We cannot be certain of the severity and length of the continued volatility in the global automotive market, including macro factors impacting our sales to OEMs in China, and the extent of the adverse effect that such volatility could have on our results of operations, financial condition and business in the long term. While automotive production has now recovered to approximately 2019 levels, current uncertain economic conditions and inflation may contribute to a reduction in consumer demand. In addition to economic conditions, in prior periods we have experienced variability in customer ordering patterns and demand timing driven by supply chain disruptions, inventory management practices and changes in OEM production expectations, including customers accelerating orders during periods of constrained supply and subsequently utilizing accumulated inventory before placing new orders. While these dynamics have largely normalized, similar fluctuations in customer ordering behavior, production estimates or inventory levels may recur in future periods and could result in variability in the timing of our revenue recognition. Additionally, recent increased demand for semi-conductor and other components has resulted in component shortages, price increases and longer order lead times, which may increase the pricing of our solutions and/or our ability to meet our customers’ demand. Certain Tier 1 customers may increase their orders for our solutions to counteract these component shortages and any resulting price increases or other impacts, causing some demand for our solutions and the corresponding revenue to be shifted to earlier time period than otherwise would have occurred. ADAS volumes have grown faster in recent years than the overall automotive market as ADAS penetration rates have increased, and we believe that we will continue to benefit from that trend. Our revenue of $558$1,066 million in the threesix months ended MarchJune 28,27, 2026 was up 27%13% year-over-year. Continued or future constraints on global automotive production resulting from the effects of economic uncertainty, both global and in specific markets in which we operate, may be a limiting factor on our ability to increase revenue. We expect to continue to capitalize on our strong and collaborative relationships with OEMs and Tier 1s to expand our presence in key markets and capture the long-term growth opportunities in those markets.
Acquisition and integration of new technologies and expansion into adjacent markets. Our results of operations may be affected by our ability to successfully integrate acquired businesses and technologies and to effectively allocate resources to new areas of development. On February 3, 2026, we acquired Mentee Robotics, a privately held Israeli company focused on humanoid robotics. The integration of Mentee Robotics’ personnel, technology and operations may require significant management attention, capital investment and operating expenses, and we may not realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition on the expected timeline or at all. Humanoid robotics is a nascent and rapidly evolving area characterized by significant technical complexity, long development timelines, potentially high capital requirements, uncertain customer demand and evolving regulatory and safety frameworks. Our investment in this area may result in increased research and development and operating expenses and may divert resources from our core ADAS and autonomous driving initiatives. In addition, the timing and extent of commercialization of humanoid robotics solutions remains uncertain with respect to scalability, economic viability and regulatory approval. In June 2026, we announced plans to establish a vertically integrated robotaxi business that would expand our role beyond supplying autonomous-driving technology to owning and operating an autonomous ride-hailing service. This expansion is in its initial stages, and may require significant management attention, Company resources, capital investment and operating expenses, as well as involve certain uncertainties. As a result, our expansion into adjacent markets,markets and new business models, including through the acquisition of Mentee Robotics,Robotics and our planned vertically integrated robotaxi business, may adversely affect our results of operations, margins and cash flows, particularly in the near to medium term.
Trade policies, sanctions and import and export controls. Trade policies and international disputes at times result in increased tariffs, trade barriers and other restrictions, which can increase our manufacturing costs, make our solutions less competitive, reduce demand for our solutions, limit our ability to sell to certain customers, limit our ability to procure raw components or raw materials or impede or slow the movement of our goods across borders. In addition, tariffs could lead to higher prices for finished automobiles, which would reduce demand for automobiles and thus the market for our products. During 2025, the United States implemented a series of broad-based and sector-specific tariffs affecting passenger vehicles, automotive components and other industrial inputs, as well as country-specific tariff regimes and reciprocal trade measures. These actions were accompanied by ongoing bilateral and multilateral negotiations, interim trade agreements, pauses, delays and retaliatory measures by certain countries, resulting in significant uncertainty regarding the scope, timing and duration of applicable tariffs and export controls. In addition, sector-specific measures announced during 2025, including tariffs on certain raw materials, and export controls affecting the semiconductor supply chain,chain and evolving AI-related export control developments, have increased complexity and risk across global automotive and technology markets. As of the date of this report, there remains a high degree of uncertainty surrounding U.S. trade policy, how it will be implemented, how other countries will react, and how it will ultimately impact our industry and business. For example, our customers may have shifted or will shift orders for components and parts, including our solutions, adjust sourcing strategies or modify productions schedules, which could shift demand for our solutions and corresponding revenue between periods. While we continually evaluate changes in U.S. trade policy and global reactions thereto, as well as our ability to mitigate their impact, these developments may negatively impact our customers, our results of operations and our business. For additional information, see “Item IA - Risk Factors - We are subject to risk related to trade policies, sanctions, and import and export controls” in our 2025 Form 10-K.
Supply and manufacturing capacity. Our solutions are dependent on the global semiconductor supply chain. The continued and timely supply of input materials, the availability of manufacturing capacity, and packaging and testing services at reasonable prices impact our ability to meet customer demand. Supply chain disruptions, shortages of raw material, such as wafers and substrates, and manufacturing limitations could limit our ability to meet customer demand and result in delayed, reduced, or canceled orders. In prior periods, we experienced supply chain disruptions, raw material shortages and manufacturing capacity constraints that reduced the availability of key components, including EyeQ™ SoCs, and resulted in lower inventory levels and limitations on our ability to meet customer demand. As supply conditions improved, we increased inventory levels to help mitigate potential future constraints. However, if similar disruptions were to recur, depending on their duration and severity, we may again be required to operate with reduced inventory levels, which could limit our ability to meet customer demand. As a result, we are substantially reliant on timely shipments of EyeQTM SoCs from STMicroelectronics and ECUs from Quanta Computer (or other suppliers) and may in the future become reliant on additional suppliers such as TSMC, to fulfill customer orders and if such a shortfall of chips or ECUs were to occur, we may be unable to offset future supply constraints through the use of inventory on hand. Further, in 2025 and in 2026 the AI industry has generated increased demand for components necessary for the production of our solutions, including EyeQ™ SoCs and ECUs for our SuperVision™, Mobileye Chauffeur™ and Mobileye Drive™ solutions. This new demand has resulted in and may continue to result in incrasedincreased competition for and shortages of components necessary for our solutions, substantial increases in prices for such components and suppliers requiring us to increase lead times and purchase greater quantities of such components in advance in order to ensure we secure sufficient supply. Such shortages of components, as well as the increases in pricing, order requirements and lead times, has and may continue to impact our ability to supply solutions to our customers in order to meet demand as well as impact OEMs’ ability to purchase our solutions. Our reliance on single or limited suppliers and vendors for certain components, equipment, and services and the aforementioned shortages of substrates and other components have led to increased supply chain risks and continue to stress our ability to meet the supply demands of our customers. To mitigate these supply chain constraints, management continues to monitor inventory levels on an ongoing basis. Although we cannot fully predict the length and the severity of the impact these pressures will have on a long-term basis, we do not currently anticipate that our current supply chain constraints would materially adversely affect our results of operations, capital resources, sales, profits, and liquidity on a long-term basis.
Equity compensation expenses. In connection with the Mobileye IPO, we established an equity incentive plan for purposes of granting share-based compensation awards to certain members of our senior management, to our non-employee directors and to employees, to incentivize their performance and align their interests with ours. Historically, grants of share-based compensation to our employees were made pursuant to Intel’s employee equity incentive plans, and such historical grants will continue to be based on their original vesting schedules. Equity compensation has been, and will continue to be, an important part of our future compensation strategy and a significant component of our future expenses, which we expect to increase over time.
EyeQTM SoC sales represented approximately 92%90% and 94%92% of our revenue for the three months ended MarchJune 28,27, 2026 and MarchJune 29,28, 2025, respectively, and 91% and 93% of our revenue in the six months ended June 27, 2026 and June 28, 2025, respectively. Sales of our SuperVision™ product represented over half of the reminderremainder of our revenue for the three and six months ended MarchJune 28,27, 20262026, and less than half of the remainder of our revenue for the three and six months ended MarchJune 29,28, 2025. Revenue from the sale of our EyeQTM products and SuperVision™ products is recognized at the time of product shipment from our facilities, as determined by the agreed-upon shipping terms. Our sales to any single Tier 1 automotive supplier typically cover more than one OEM and more than one production program from any OEM.
Cost of revenue consists primarily of expenses associated with the manufacturing cost of our EyeQTM SoCs and our SuperVision™ product, and amortization of acquired intangible assets, identified as developed technology.technology and developed IP. Additional costs are royalty fees for the intellectual property that is included in the EyeQTM SoC, personnel-related expenses, logistics and insurance costs and allocated overhead costs. As we develop and sell full systems that include hardware beyond EyeQTM SoCs, we expect that our gross margin will decrease over time because of the greater hardware content included in our solutions. However, as a result of a higher expected selling price for such systems, we expect our gross profit per unit will increase on a dollar basis in future periods.
Research and development expenses primarily consist of expenses associated with personnel related expenses, facilities, equipment and supplies for research and development activities, materials, parts and other prototype development, cloud computing services, consulting and other professional services, amortization of acquired intangible asset related to developed IP, quality assurance within the development programs, and allocated overhead costs.
On March 29, 2026, the Israeli Knesset enacted the “Law for the Encouragement and Incentivization of Research and Development, 2026” (the “R&D Law”). The R&D Law introduces a refundable tax credit regime which applies to qualifying research and developments expenditures incurred in tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2026. The R&D Law provides eligible companies with an incentive calculated as a percentage of qualifying research and development expenditures incurred in Israel. Subject to applicable statutory requirements and other conditions, the incentive may be offset against Israeli income taxes or Israeli qualified domestic minimum top-up taxes (“QDMTT”). Alternatively, an unused grant may be received in cash after the prescribed carryforward period, or an eligible company may make an irrevocable election to receive the incentive as a cash grant rather than a credit. Such incentives are recognized as a reduction of research and development expenses once there is reasonable assurance that the Company complies with required conditions and the incentive will be received.
Goodwill impairment expenses consist of a non-cash impairment loss recognized for the goodwill of the “Mobileye” reporting unit in the threesix months ended MarchJune 28,27, 2026, as a result of the impairment analysis the Company performed during the first quarter of 2026.
Benefit (provision) for income taxes consists primarily of income taxes related to the United States, Israel and other foreign jurisdictions in which we conduct business. We also have incurred deferred tax liabilities with respect to tax amortization of certain acquired intangible assets. We are eligible for certain tax benefits in Israel under the Investment Law, at a reduced tax rate, subject to specified terms.
Benefit (provision) for income taxes consists primarily of income taxes related to the United States, Israel and other foreign jurisdictions in which we conduct business. We also have incurred deferred tax liabilities with respect to tax amortization of certain acquired intangible assets. We are eligible for certain tax benefits in Israel under the Investment Law, at a reduced tax rate, subject to specified terms. In addition, in 2021, the OECD announced an Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting including Pillar Two Model Rules defining the global minimum tax, which calls for the taxation of large multinational corporations at a minimum rate of 15%. Subsequently, multiple sets of administrative guidance have been issued. Many non-USnon-U.S. tax jurisdictions have either recently enacted legislation to adopt certain components of the Pillar Two Model Rules beginning in 2024 (including the European Union Member States), with the adoption of additional components in later years, or announced their plans to enact legislation in future years. In Israel, the regulations ofimplementing the Pillar Two Model Rules became effective for tax years beginning after January 1, 2026. The Pillar Two Model Rules doesare not expected to have a material effect on our income tax provision for the 2026 fiscal year.year 2026. We are continuing to evaluate the impacts of enacted legislation and pending legislation to enact Pillar Two Model Rules in the non-USnon-U.S. tax jurisdictions in which we operate. The Company is a constituent entity of its Parent for Pillar Two Model Rules purposes.
On March 29, 2026, the Israeli Knesset approved the R&D Law. The R&D Law introduces a refundable tax credit regime calculated as a percentage of qualifying research and development expenditures incurred in Israel, beginning on or after January 1, 2026, and is intended to align with the OECD Pillar Two framework. Subject to applicable statutory requirements and other conditions, eligible companies may offset the incentive against Israeli income taxes or QDMTT. Alternatively, an unused grant may be received in cash after the prescribed carryforward period, or an eligible company may make an irrevocable election to receive the incentive as a cash grant rather than a credit. Such incentives are recognized as a reduction to research and development expenses once there is reasonable assurance the conditions will be met and the benefit will be received.
On March 29, 2026, the Israeli Knesset approved the Law for the Encouragement and Promotion of Research and Development, 2026 (the “Incentive Law”). The Incentive Law introduces a framework of incentives for research and development activities, to be provided either as a tax credit or as a cash grant in lieu thereof, and is intended to align with the OECD Pillar Two framework. As of the date of approval of these financial statements, the Company is assessing the potential impact of the Incentive Law on its operations, including its effect on the Company’s results of operations and eligibility for incentives.
(1) Includes amortization of acquired intangible assets, as follows:
(2) Includes share-based compensation expense, as follows:
(3) Includes the R&D Law incentive grant related to ordinary income from sold RSUs which reflects the actual sale of shares of common stock issued upon conversion of restricted stock units and is recognized as a reduction to research and development expenses:
Comparison of the Threethree Monthsand six months ended MarchJune 28,27, 2026 and MarchJune 29,28, 2025
In the three months ended June 27, 2026, revenue increased by $2 million compared to the three months ended June 28, 2025. This increase in revenue was primarily due to an increase of $15 million in SuperVisionTM mostly attributable to an 81% increase in volume resulting from higher customer demand, partially offset by a decrease of $10 million in EyeQTM SoC revenue, mostly attributable to higher sales to Chinese OEMs with lower Average System Price. Average System Price, calculated as the sum of revenue related to EyeQTM and SuperVisionTM systems divided by the number of systems delivered, decreased by approximately 2%, primarily due to the higher portion of EyeQTM sales to Chinese OEMs, partially offset by a higher percentage of SuperVisionTM related revenue as compared to the second quarter of 2025.
In the threesix months ended MarchJune 28,27, 2026, revenue increased by $120$122 million, or 27%,13%, compared to the threesix months ended MarchJune 29,28, 2025,2025. mainlyThis increase was primarily due to an increase of $100$90 million, or 24%,10%, in EyeQTM SoC revenue,and primarily$34 million or 181% in SuperVisionTM revenue attributable mainly to a 28%15% and 164% increase in volumevolumes attributablerespectively, toresulting mainly from higher EyeQcustomer demand,demand. asAverage wellSystem asPrice decreased by 1%, mainly due to the normalizationhigher portion of safetyEyeQTM stocksales levelsto atChinese ourOEMs, Tierpartially 1offset customers,by a higher percentage of SuperVisionTM related revenue as acompared result of a certain draw down which took place into the fourthsix quartermonths ofended June 28, 2025.
In the three months ended MarchJune 28,27, 2026, our cost of revenue increased by $52$19 million, or 23%,7% compared to the three months ended MarchJune 29,28, 2025,2025. due to anThe increase ofis $52attributed million into manufacturing costs, mainly resulting from the increase in sales of EyeQTMSuperVisionTM systems,systems inas additionwell toas anhigher increasecost inresulting salesfrom different generation mix of SuperVisionTMEyeQTM systems.SoC.
In the six months ended June 27, 2026, our cost of revenue increased by $71 million, or 15%, compared to the six months ended June 28, 2025. The increase is attributed to manufacturing costs, mainly resulting from the increase in sales of EyeQTM SoC and SuperVisionTM systems.
In the three months ended MarchJune 28,27, 2026, our gross profit increaseddecreased by $68$17 million, or 33%,7% compared to the three months ended MarchJune 29,28, 2025. ThisThe increasedecrease was mainlyprimarily drivendue byto thea modest reduction in EyeQTM ASP, as well as an increase in salesamortization of EyeQTMintangible systems.assets associated with the acquisition of Mentee Robotics, which was slightly offset by an increase in SuperVisionTM revenue.
In the six months ended June 27, 2026, our gross profit increased by $51 million, or 11%, compared to the six months ended June 28, 2025. The increase was primarily due to the increase in EyeQTM and SuperVisionTM revenue, slightly offset by an increase in amortization of intangible assets associated with the acquisition of Mentee Robotics.
In the three months ended June 27, 2026, our gross margin decreased to 46% compared to 50% in the three months ended June 28, 2025. This decrease was due to a modest reduction in EyeQTM ASP, mainly attributable to higher volume sold to Chinese OEMs, which carry lower ASP, in addition to a higher portion of SuperVisionTM revenue with lower margin given the greater hardware content included. In the six months ended June 27, 2026, our gross margin decreased to 48% compared to 49% in the six months ended June 28, 2025. This decrease was primarily due to a modest reduction in EyeQTM ASP, mainly attributed to higher volume sold to Chinese OEMs, which carry lower ASP.
Our gross margin increased from 47% for the three months ended March 29, 2025, to 49% for the three months ended March 28, 2026. This increase was primarily due to the lower impact of amortization of intangible assets as a percentage of revenue, partially offset by a higher EyeQ-related cost per unit given the different mix of EyeQ products sold.
Research and development expenses, net, in the three months ended MarchJune 28,27, 2026, increaseddecreased by $48$75 million, or 17%,27%, compared to the three months ended MarchJune 29,28, 2025. This increasedecrease was primarily due to ana increase$110 inmillion R&D Law incentive grant recognized this quarter for the entire first half of 2026, which was partially offset by higher payroll and related expenses, resulting from an increase in salary expenses andmainly unfavorabledue fluctuationto the effect of exchange rate fluctuations of the U.S. Dollar against the New Israeli ShekelsShekel, againstas U.Swell dollars.as Inhigher addition, stock basedshare-based compensation expense increased, mainly given the additional equity awards granted as part of the acquisition of Mentee Robotics.expenses.
Research and development expenses, net, in the six months ended June 27, 2026 decreased by $27 million, or 5%, compared to the six months ended June 28, 2025. This decrease was mainly due to a $110 million R&D Law incentive grant recognized this quarter for the entire first half of 2026, partially offset by an increase in payroll and related expenses mainly due to the effect of exchange rate fluctuations of the U.S. Dollar against the New Israeli Shekel, in addition to an increase in average research and development headcount, higher share-based compensation expenses, higher cloud compute expenses and higher occupancy expenses including depreciation.
Sales and marketing expenses in the three months ended MarchJune 28,27, 2026, decreasedincreased by $2 million,million or 6%,8% compared to the three months ended MarchJune 29,28, 2025, mainly givendue lowerto higher marketing expenses.
Sales and marketing expenses in the six months ended June 27, 2026, remained flat compared to the six months ended June 28, 2025.
General and administrative expenses in the three months ended MarchJune 28,27, 2026,2026 increased by $13$12 million,million or 72%,63% compared to the three months ended MarchJune 29,28, 2025.2025 This increase was primarily relateddue to transactionhigher costsshare-based compensation expenses associated primarily with the acquisition of Mentee Robotics, as well as to higher stock based compensation, resulting mainly from the acquisition of Mentee Robotics.
General and administrative expenses in the six months ended June 27, 2026 increased by $25 million or 68%, compared to the six months ended June 28, 2025. This increase was due to transaction costs and share-based compensation expenses associated primarily with the acquisition of Mentee Robotics.
Goodwill impairment expenses were zero and $3,788 million in the three and six months ended MarchJune 28,27, 20262026, respectively, and zero in the three and six months ended MarchJune 29,28, 2025. During the first quarter of 2026, the Company performed an interim quantitative goodwill impairment analysis for the “Mobileye” reporting unit, resulting in a non-cash impairment loss. For further details, refer to Note 12 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report.
Financial income, net, in the three months ended MarchJune 28,27, 2026,2026 wasremained $14 millionflat compared to $18 million in the three months ended MarchJune 29,28, 2025. This decrease was2025, mainly dueas toa result of a decrease in interest income earned on investment in money market funds due to cash used for the acquisition of Mentee Robotics andin aFebruary decrease2026, derivedwhich fromwas offset by the impact of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates,rates. Financial income, net, in the six months ended June 27, 2026 decreased by $4 million, or 13%, compared to the six months ended June 28, 2025, due to a decrease in interest income, which was partially offset by anthe increaseimpact of fluctuations in interestforeign earnedexchange on short term bank deposits.rates.
In the three months ended June 27, 2026 provision for income tax was $4 million, compared to $6 million in the three months ended June 28, 2025. The decrease of $2 million in tax provision was primarily due to the reduction in deferred tax liability resulting from the goodwill impairment to the Mobileye reporting unit which was recorded in the first quarter of 2026, partially offset by a lower loss before income taxes in foreign jurisdictions. In the six months ended June 27, 2026, benefit for income tax was $60 million, compared to a provision for income tax of $9 million in the six months ended June 28, 2025, mainly due to the deferred tax effect of $67 million attributed to goodwill impairment to the Mobileye reporting unit which was recorded in the first quarter of 2026.
Benefit for income tax in the three months ended March 28, 2026, was $64 million compared to a provision for income tax of $(3) million in the three months ended March 29, 2025. This $67 million change is mainly due to the deferred tax effect of goodwill impairment to the Mobileye reporting unit.
Our primary uses of funds have been for funding increases in headcount in our research and development departments,departments; investments attributable to new product development, as well as for funding our capital expenditures, anddevelopment; the recent acquisition of Mentee Robotics, a humanoid robotics company.company; the repurchase program authorized by our Board of Directors in April 2026 to repurchase up to $250 million of Mobileye’s outstanding Class A common stock (the “Repurchase Program”), as well as for funding our capital expenditures. Our capital expenditures for purchase of property and equipment have related mainly to data storage and other computer related equipment, expenditure related to research and development projects including data farming and cloud computecompute, and to leasehold improvements, and were $30$51 million and $14$28 million for the threesix months ended MarchJune 28,27, 2026 and MarchJune 29,28, 2025, respectively. Cash paid for the acquisition of Mentee Robotics, net of cash acquired, was $591 million.
For the threesix months ended MarchJune 28,27, 2026 compared to the threesix months ended MarchJune 29,28, 2025, the $34$112 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities was mainly due to a higher increase in trade accounts receivable and a lower decrease in inventory compared to priorthe yearsix period,months ended June 28, 2025, due to the increase in sales and the relatively low accounts receivable balance as of the end of 2025. This was partially offset by ana higher increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and related party payable compared to a decrease in prior year period.
Net cash used in investing activities in the threesix months ended MarchJune 28,27, 2026 and theJune three months ended March 29,28, 2025 was $699$719 million and $25$39 million, respectively. The threesix months ended MarchJune 28,27, 2026 include $591 million net cash paid for the acquisition of Mentee Robotics. In both periods net cash used in investing activities includeincluded capital expenditures and debt investments.
Net cash used in financing activities in the six months ended June 27, 2026 was $24 million consisting of repurchases of common stock. Net cash used in financing activities in the six months ended June 28, 2025 was zero.
Net cash provided by financing activities in the three months ended March 28, 2026 and the three months ended March 29, 2025 was $0 million and $3 million, respectively, consisting of share-based compensation recharge with Intel.
Israeli labor laws and agreements require severance payments upon dismissal of an employee or upon termination of employment in other circumstances. The severance pay liability with respect to Israeli employees is calculated pursuant to the Israeli Severance Pay Law based on the most recent salary of the employees multiplied by the number of years of employment as of the balance sheet date.
Our liability for all of our Israeli employees is covered by monthly deposits with severance pay funds. The value of the deposited funds is based on the cash surrender value of these policies and includes profits (or loss) accumulated through the balance sheet date. The deposited funds may be withdrawn only upon the fulfillment of the obligations pursuant to the Israeli Severance Pay Law or labor agreements.
Severance pay liability increased from $78 million as of December 27, 2025, to $83 million as of June 27, 2026, mainly due to the impact of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates.
Severance pay liability was $78 million as of March 28, 2026 and December 27, 2025.
We have lease agreements for vehicles and offices. We lease office space in various locations in Israel and around the world including USA, Germany and China. All leases are operating leases with fixed payment terms where some of the leases include annual increases to lease payments based on an index or a rate. Lease liabilities,liabilities as of June 27, 2026, representing the present value of future lease payments, have increasedremained fromflat $62compared million as ofto December 27, 20252025, due to $63 million as of March 28, 2026, reflecting mainly new lease contracts, partiallycontracts offset by the progress in lease payments for existing arrangements.
We have several bank guarantees aggregating approximately $22$24 million as of MarchJune 28,27, 2026 (denominated in New Israeli Shekels) mainly in connection with lease agreements and import of vehicles.
Our management uses Adjusted Gross Profit (Loss) and Margin, Adjusted Operating Income (Loss) and Margin and Adjusted Net Income (Loss), collectively, as key measures in operating our business. We use such non-GAAP financial measures to make strategic decisions, establish business plans and forecasts, identify trends affecting our business, and evaluate performance. For example, we use these non-GAAP financial measures to assess our pricing and sourcing strategy, in the preparation of our annual operating budget, and as a measure of our operating performance. We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures, when taken collectively, may be helpful to investors because they allow for greater transparency into what measures our management (and Intel’s management) uses in operating our business and measuring our performance, and enable comparison of financial trends and results between periods where items may vary independent of business performance. The non-GAAP financial measures are presented for supplemental informational purposes only, should not be considered a substitute for financial information presented in accordance with GAAP, and may be different from similarly titled non-GAAP measures used by other companies. A reconciliation is provided below for each non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable financial measure presented in accordance with GAAP. Investors are encouraged to review the related GAAP financial measures and the reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures, as well as our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.
Our non-GAAP financial measures reflect adjustments for amortization charges forof our acquisition-related intangible assets, share-based compensation expenses, R&D Law incentive grant related to ordinary income from sold RSUs, acquisition-related expenses, impairment of goodwill and the related income tax effects where applicable. We exclude amortization charges for our acquisition-related intangible assets for purposes of calculating certain non-GAAP measures, although revenue is generated, in part, by these intangible assets, to eliminate the impact of these non-cash charges that are inconsistent in size and are significantly impacted by the timing and valuation of our acquisitions. We believe that the exclusion of share-based compensation expense is appropriate because it eliminates the impact of non-cash expenses for equity-based compensation costs that are based upon valuation methodologies and assumptions that vary over time, and the amount of the expense can vary significantly between companies due to factors that are unrelated to their core operating performance and that can be outside of their control. Although we exclude share-based compensation expenses from our non-GAAP measures, equity compensation has been, and will continue to be, an important part of our future compensation strategy and a significant component of our future expenses, and may increase in future periods. We believe that the exclusion of goodwill impairment is appropriate because it does not reflect our core operating performance, and excluding such non-cash impairment loss facilitates a useful evaluation of our performance and comparisons to past operating results. acquisition-relatedWe believe that the exclusion of the R&D Law incentive grant related to ordinary income from sold RSUs is consistent with our treatment of share-based compensation expenses in our non-GAAP measures, as it relates to incentives associated with equity-based compensation that are excluded from our non-GAAP results. Acquisition-related expenses include professional fees and other costs incurred in connection with business combinations. We believe exclusion of acquisition-related expenses is appropriate because they are transaction-specific costs and not reflective of our ongoing operating results.
We define Adjusted Gross Profit as gross profit presented in accordance with GAAP, excluding amortization of acquisition related intangibles and share-based compensation expense.expenses. Adjusted Gross Margin is calculated as Adjusted Gross Profit divided by total revenue.
Our Adjusted Gross Margin decreased from 69% in both the three and six months ended June 28, 2025 to 66% in both the three and six months ended June 27, 2026. This decrease was primarily due to a modest reduction in EyeQTM ASP, mainly attributable to higher volume sold to Chinese OEMs, which carry lower ASP, and a higher portion of SuperVisionTM revenue with lower margin given the greater hardware content included.
Our Adjusted Gross Margin decreased from 69% for the three months ended March 29, 2025 to 66% for the three months ended March 28, 2026. This was mainly due to a higher EyeQ™-related cost per unit given the different mix of EyeQ™ products sold. The decrease was also related to higher percentage of revenue attributable to SupervisionTM.
We define Adjusted Operating Income (Loss) as operating income (loss) presented in accordance with GAAP, adjusted to exclude amortization of acquisition related intangibles andintangibles, share-based compensation expenses, the R&D Law incentive grant related to ordinary income from sold RSUs acquisition-related expenses and impairment of goodwill. Operating Margin is calculated as operating income (loss) divided by total revenue, and Adjusted Operating Margin is calculated as Adjusted Operating Income (Loss) divided by total revenue.
Our Operating Loss increased by $3,779 million in the three months ended March 28, 2026 compared to the three months ended March 29, 2025, mainly due to the goodwill impairment loss recognized this quarter.
MBLY insider buying and selling (Form 4)
Since 2026-04-11, insiders reported open-market purchases in 2 Form 4 filings (2 insiders, 2 trade dates, 24,201 shares, about $198.8K) and open-market sales in 0 filings. Net open-market shares: 24,201 (purchases minus sales); net value about $198.8K.Totals add up every open-market (code P and S) line in those filings, using the prices reported in the filings. Awards, option exercises, tax withholding and gifts are listed below but not counted.
| Trade date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-10 | Ohayon Yaacov |
Grant/award | 116,550 | — | — |
| 2026-08-06 | Yeboah-Amankwah Safroadu |
Open-market purchase | 11,841 | $8.46 | $100.2K |
| 2026-07-30 | Yeary Frank D |
Open-market purchase | 12,360 | $7.98 | $98.6K |
| 2026-07-10 | Nehushtan Nimrod |
Grant/award | 199,680 | — | — |
| 2026-07-10 | Shalev-Shwartz Shai |
Grant/award | 1,064,962 | — | — |
| 2026-07-10 | Shemesh Rojansky Moran |
Grant/award | 212,992 | — | — |
| 2026-07-10 | Ouriel Boaz |
Grant/award | 266,240 | — | — |
| 2026-07-10 | Shashua Amnon |
Grant/award | 1,618,743 | — | — |
Well-known investors holding MBLY (13F)
| Investor | Quarter | Shares | Reported value | % of their 13F | Change vs prior quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-06-30 | 10,216,964 | $98.9M | 0.07% | Added 3% |
| Point72 Asset Management (Steve Cohen) | 2026-06-30 | 4,889,226 | $47.3M | 0.07% | Added 69% |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-06-30 | 3,560,446 | $34.5M | 0.05% | Added 4% |
| PRIMECAP Management | 2026-06-30 | 3,417,080 | $33.1M | 0.02% | Added 7% |
| Baillie Gifford | 2026-06-30 | 4,140,398 | $28.4M | — | Sold out |
| Millennium Management (Israel Englander) | 2026-06-30 | 2,105,325 | $20.4M | 0.01% | Reduced 4% |
| AQR Capital Management (Cliff Asness) | 2026-06-30 | 1,053,653 | $10.2M | 0.0% | Added 429% |
| Citadel Advisors (Ken Griffin) | 2026-06-30 | 954,266 | $9.2M | 0.01% | Reduced 41% |
| ARK Investment Management (Cathie Wood) | 2026-06-30 | 281,104 | $2.7M | 0.02% | Added 39% |
| D. E. Shaw & Co. | 2026-06-30 | 255,241 | $2.5M | 0.0% | Reduced 43% |